It would be interesting if our Unz would write about anti-Communist fake info, produced with support of the CIA and others. It seems that many anti-Communist narratives were debunked recently.
 

"Russia and China could not vote against the US proposal, as it was endorsed by Ramallah and by literally all Islamic and Middle East nations. If the Palestinians and its Arab friends support the proposal, Russians and Chinese could not do more than abstain."

Lame excuse. They could do whatever they wanted, especially knowing, as the whole world knows, that "Ramallah"-- the traitorous bunch acting as Israel's police on the West Bank-- does NOT represent the Palestinians any more than the whorish Arab states slaves of USrael do.
"Arab friends"? Who? Saudi Arabia, the emirates, Egypt? Please, spare us the BS.

So, your excuse is that since nobody has done anything to stop genocide, China and Russia have no obligation to condemn its finalising?

You didn't answer the question of why Putin sat inside Syria for 10 years and allowed Israel to bomb indiscriminately. One Oreshnik missile onto the knesset might have solved all our problems permanently. Recently there was a gala wedding in Jerusalem between the children of the chief Rabbi of Russia and the chief Rabbi of Ukraine, both of them Chabad. They are partying while Christians are slaughtering each other back home. Putin is known to be very close to this movement. Also supposedly he knew the truth about the 9/11 attacks. He calls America an empire of lies. All he had to do was expose the truth but he never did. He sucked up to George W Bush and ingratiated himself and tried to hitch a ride on the global war on terrorism bandwagon.

I used to watch Putin a lot on YouTube. Before the Ukraine invasion. I was very impressed with his intelligence and eloquence. I thought he was a great leader. Smart dignified polite and decisive. But in the subsequent years I have been massively disappointed. I would like to believe your perspective but I no longer can.

Western Europe too.
Still (relatively) powerful states UK, France, Germany.
UK and France in particular are permanent members of UNSC.

Putin is NOT a supporter of Israel. But he has to consider that the Jews rule America.
 

New forensic technology that matches tongue licks with people shows Putin was licking Bibi's ass 1" to left and 1" higher than the orange idiot.

Replies: @Bama

Putin is definitely wary of Israel.

Anon is not as insane as the retard who wrote this:

This is indeed regretful, for Putin and Trump have in common real enemies, namely the leaders of Britain, France, Germany, the European Union and the ultra-liberal stateless intelligentsia
 

Replies: @A123, @Mike_from_Russia, @Michael Korn, @Eduardo

I never said they still lived in Russia, just that these are a few of the Jewish oligarchs involved with Putin. These Jews can live anywhere in the world & control their various frontmen (Putin/Trump/Zelensky/Xi etc) There are numerous other ones surrounding/controlling Putin too, not mentioned in that article : e.g. Yuri Kovalchuk (Putin's 'personal banker'), Gennady Timchenko, Arkady & Boris Rotenberg, Igor Sechin, Oleg Deripaska. I'm sure there's many more.

Replies: @littlereddot, @Michael Korn

Wrong - Russia has the second highest rate of jewish billionaires globally(excluding Israel) and 60% of Russian billionaires are jewish.

Replies: @bike-anarkist

Israel is a well-known laundromat for corrupt and criminal money. Somewhere it was mentioned that they charge 20% for this.

The fact remains that Putin is a supporter of the illegal criminal state of Israel. Why? Supposedly because many Israelis came from Russia. But Russian Israelis are Israelis First and Russians Last,
just like American Jews are Israelis First and Americans Last.

Replies: @Passing by, @israel shamir

The mentioned Jewish billionaires are all gone from Russia. They do not rule anything.
 

International Jewry is not going to be foaming at the mouth, pulling out all stops, and pushing attacks on Russia up to the point of risking nuclear annihilation if Putin and Russia were even compliant with their agenda, let alone totally controlled by them. After 10/7 there were questions raised about why so many Mossad assets were in Ukraine helping Ukrainian SBU and AFU rather than in Israel prior to the Hamas large-scale attack.

I don’t know, maybe Hasbara has had some success with this inanity on some white nationalist 4chan boards, but I don’t see this totally retarded Zionist propaganda gaining much traction here at UR.

The mentioned Jewish billionaires are all gone from Russia. They do not rule anything.

You and others here idealize Russia based on your imagination of what you want it to be and not what it is.

Putin put his Jewish chef turned oligarch billionaire are in charge of the main front after Russia was kicked out of Kiev.

The president of the European Jewish Congress is a Russian billionaire.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viatcheslav_Kantor

My Estonian friend recently told me “Russia is most Christian country in the world”, and I wholeheartedly agreed with him. Russia is Christian, the plentiful churches were rebuild and beautified.

Russia is 70% Christian which puts it well below nearby countries like Poland, Romania and Ukraine. That number is expected to the drop as the Russian Orthodox have a birth rate at an all time low. The Russian government recently in fact stopped releasing fertility statistics.

Romania is incredibly 99% Christian so your friend would be wrong on multiple levels. Russia is not the most Christian nation in Europe or even Eastern Europe. Not even close and they in fact have Europe's largest populations of atheists, Muslims and Ashkenazi Jews.

There are no Winter Holidays, Russia has its Christmas, as once upon a time you had. The Russian President Mr Putin frequently attends Church services.

Putin attends services for the cameras.

He also brings in Muslims which of course isn't shown on Russian State TV (They don't allow free media).

Moscow looks like the Middle East during Muslim holidays:
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/04lUO5FXHug

Most people would guess that to be Cario if given the choice.

But their importance and closeness to Putin is a thing of past. Independent Russia is definitely a Christian Land.

Putin is on record describing Russia as a multi-religious and multi-racial empire. He is also on record describing race mixing as good for Russia and that both Muslim and Jewish values are good for the country.

So by his words he would disagree with your characterization. I can look up those quotes from him if you would like. I can also pull the video of him kissing a Koran.

The essence of Israel Shamir's admonition that Christ is the essential defense against the Jews lies not in being interpreted as merely the superficial practice of religion, as most will understand it. On that level it is vulnerable to Jewish (and others) infiltration and corruption.

The real truth and power in Shamir's upholding of Christ as the key defense lies at a deeper mythic level. Understood mythically, opening to Christ is a mental opening to the Inner Self or divine essence which is the real source within us. In their hostility to this deeper mythic Christ the Jews finds themselves trapped in the real prison which binds them - that is rigid mental egoism. So Shamir is right, albeit at a very deep level.

What he is postulating IMO is best understood mythically. This long 5,000 year Patriarchal time cycle, which is now ending, has delivered us into a world wherein the mental ego has risen to overlay, bury and displace our opening to our own inner divine selves. It has been buried culturally for a long time.

Hegel made a big thing of this. So the evolutionary imperative of our time is to nourish humanity's re-awakening to its own innate divine nature. The West's mythic code for this is to awaken to the Christ Self within.

This process obliges a dialectical struggle between patriarchal egoism and the awakening Self (Christ) Essentially we are living inside a mass dialectical movement wherein the rising Inner Self moves to displace the hegemony of patriarchal egoism.

The role of the Jew is essential here. He is ideal for this given his robotic inability to do anything other than always double down. His role is to provoke and to provoke and in so doing to reveal himself. To fanatically push the control drive of reactive egoism and in so doing force this deep inner mythic dialectic up out of the buried and invisible unknown and to the surface of consciousness.

This process inevitably forces us to move beyond out own egoism and open to deeper spiritual resources within ourselves. Therein we may just discover for ourselves the mythic truth hidden inside Shamir's admonition that Christ is the solution.

His formula is mythic code. Our choice is simply at what level of consciousness we choose to understand it.

Replies: @JWalters, @Anonymous, @Obbledy, @Alanchik, @Spinny Name

You got it. Jesus, the One who labeled the Christ-rejecting Jews as "children of the devil" akin to liars and murderers just like their father, who are also of the Synagogue of Satan. Who can legitimately argue with that except for Christ-rejecters who would murder Him all over again, whether Jew or gentile (i.e. Shabbos Goys)?

Even unbelievers have no defense against the flat-out righteousness of Christ's teachings in the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.

Even though they pretend He didn't exist, they cannot deny that His Teachings are just and reasonable, and promote Life instead of destroying life.

Yet the unbelievers apparently hate the idea of promoting Life, and want to be God themselves, based on their selfishness and lack of humility, even though they too receive many daily blessings from God which they don't even consider or acknowledge.

Of course, the unbelievers are often reacting to all the hypocrisy from so-called "Christians", 98% of whom either don't read or know or do much of what Jesus teaches. That's not the Word's fault, it's theirs... but still doesn't give the unbelievers an excuse to not read the Word themselves.

The only problem with this theory is that Christianity is the vehicle by which Jewish thought was spread across the globe, at an incalculable cost in human misery, Christianity’s fundamental premise is Judaism’s, the existence of a unitary creator deity that interacts with humans in a specific pattern. No other religion advanced this notion in ancient times; the others in the Greco-Roman world being polytheistic and tolerant of other people’s gods. No other deities had opinions and regulations about your most intimate personal behaviors and attitudes, let alone your thoughts. They required the occasional sacrifice, and they kept the sun rising and the rains falling in exchange, or so it was believed. None threatened eternal postmortem punishment for transgressions, while favorable status in the Underworld was secured by valor in combat, not by, say, keeping it in your toga.

Replies: @David Parker, @Poupon Marx, @Madbadger

Yeah, that fact that Christianity and its civilization and culture is the obsessive focus of Jewish hatred is what Colombo would call a “clue” that the one standing in the way of the Jews is Jesus Christ.

“And while religious Judaism has a decidedly negative view towards all non-Jews, Christianity in particular is regarded as a total abomination, which must be wiped from the face of the earth… the Christian Bible represents purest evil, and if circumstances permit, burning Bibles is a very praiseworthy act. Pious Jews are also enjoined to always spit three times at any cross or church they encounter, and direct a curse at all Christian cemeteries. Indeed, many deeply religious Jews utter a prayer each and every day for the immediate extermination of all Christians.”

From Ron Unz, American Pravda, “Oddities of the Jewish Religion: The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism” ( July 16, 2018).

https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-oddities-of-the-jewish-religion/
 

“…religious Jews apparently pray to Satan almost as readily as they pray to God, and depending upon the various rabbinical schools, the particular rituals and sacrifices they practice may be aimed at enlisting the support of the one or the other…

…lives of religious Jews were often dominated by all sorts of highly superstitious practices, including magical charms, potions, spells, incantations, hexes, curses, and sacred talismans, with rabbis often having an important secondary role as sorcerers, and this even remains entirely true today among the enormously influential rabbis of Israel and the New York City area.”

From Unz, Ibid.
 

“Give me control of a nation's money, and I care not who rules it.” — Meyer Rothschild

“Taking him to a high mountain, the devil showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their splendor. ‘I will give you all these,' he said, ‘if you fall at my feet and worship me'.” (Luke 4:8-10).

“The final battle for Christianity will be over the money problem, and until that is solved there can be no universal application of Christianity.” — Honore de Balzac

Replies: @mulga mumblebrain, @Kingsmeg

Christ is the main defence against the Jews and their shabbos goyim.
 

It Is Christian Zionists Who Will Be Left Behind by Chuck Baldwin

The message "It Is Christian Zionists Who Will Be Left Behind" was delivered by Pastor Chuck Baldwin during a service at Liberty Fellowship on October 19, 2025. The sermon emphasizes the belief that Christian Zionists will be the ones left behind in the end times, as they are seen as those who do not align with the biblical mandate for Israel. The message is part of a broader discussion on the theological and political implications of Christian Zionism, particularly in the context of contemporary political and religious movements
 

Leading archaeologist says Old Testament stories are fiction
ABRAHAM, Jacob, Moses, King David, and King Solomon never existed, a 15-year study of archaeological evidence has concluded. The study - by Professor Thomas Thompson, one of the world's foremost authorities on biblical archaeology - says that the first 10 books of the Old Testament are almost certainly fiction, written between 500 and 1,500 years after the events they purport to describe. ... there is a complete absence of archaeological and historical evidence for many events portrayed in the Bible. The inevitable conclusion, he argues, is that the Israelite exile in Egypt, the Exodus and the Israelite conquest of the Promised Land never took place.
 

https://johnkaminski.info/pages/the_next_chapter/three_sides_of_the_same_coin.html

Three sides of the same coin - ‘What you are not told is that ‘The Lord’ is actually 'the Jews’15th February 2010

World Changer - Counter Bias: The only thing about your below comments is that Judiasm and Christianity are JOINED AT THE HIP SEAMLESSLY ALL THE WAY UP TO THE TOPS OF THEIR HEADS in an inoperable Siamese twin condition. The only way you can destroy Jews and Judiasm is to destroy Christianity. You cannot put the cart before the horse.

The Christian cannot divest himself of the influence of the Jew without throwing out the dogma of the Bible. If you rally around Christianity you circle the wagons around the Jew.
 

Christ is the main defence against the Jews and their shabbos goyim.
 

Agreed. But it's a Jesus and Christianity of the New Testament, repudiating the entirety of mainline Protestantism and establishment Catholicism, which is a lonely and hard path. Laurent Guyenot has written of this neo-Marcionism, as have others.

Reject the Old Testament, the Psalms, and all references to Zion and Israel to start the journey. Focus on the Holy Spirit aspect of the Trinity, and don't be afraid if Apollo, Homer and Henry Ford pop up in your meditations. ❇️✝️❇️

Israel Shamir,

The other day I pulled up the movie MASH from 1970. Back in the day when I was a teenager of course I was exposed to MASH the TV series but hadn't seen the actual movie.

https://www.originalfilmart.com/cdn/shop/products/mash_1970_original_film_art_2000x.jpg

I had to stop watching when I noticed Altman, the director (not Jewish btw), set up a 'last supper' scene with the degenerates of MASH. The assault on Christianity in the West is really off the chart and it is not a new phenomena.

Note that I am perfectly OK with targeting hypocrisy and hypocrites (e.g. Frank Burns the bible carrying adulterer) but mocking and denigrating the Last Supper (as it happened recently in France's olympic ceremony) is something else altogether. Something happened to the West between Voltaire and Altman and that something is not Judaism.

https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/literature/images/5/5c/VoltaireStatueFerney-Voltaire.jpg

Also, your characterizing Jewish controlled societies as uniquely having certain features does not ring true. IRI, for example, is not run by Jews but it exhibits the same set of attributes you exclusively assign to Jewish run entities. Clanish, nepocratic, huge wealth disparity between the regime flunkies and the rest of the population, etc.

In any event, you Mr. Shamir, are writing from Russia which is under the control of the CHABAD LUBAVICH CULT. The recent phenomena of someone in control flipping a switch and signaling that "it is OK now to criticize Jews and Israel" in US was informative. Overnight we have legions of establishment figures (yes, Tucker is as establishment as it gets) dumping on Israel.

Why?

Because the State of Israel (sic) is governmed by Zionists and Chabad is contra-Zionist. Their version of Jewish supremacy is different than Left/Atheist Zionists who created that entity.

*As for the Noahide laws*, these are pushed first and foremost by CHABAD in USA. Again, you are living in a Chabad controlled goy nation. What sort of game are you playing?

Education and Sharing Day in the United States, established by a joint Congressional resolution in 1978, honors the legacy of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the Lubavitcher Rebbe, and his dedication to education and the promotion of the Seven Noahide Laws. The day, observed annually on the Gregorian date corresponding to the Rebbe’s Hebrew birthday, the 11th of Nissan, is marked by a presidential proclamation that emphasizes the importance of moral and ethical values in education. Congress has consistently recognized the Rebbe’s contributions, with proclamations from every U.S. president since Jimmy Carter, highlighting the role of education in fostering character, justice, and societal well-being. The day serves as a national call to focus on the foundational values of civilization, rooted in the Noahide Laws, and to inspire future generations through meaningful learning.
 

Putin's Russia and Chabad

The Symbiotic Relationship with the Kremlin

Starting in 1999, soon after Putin became prime minister, he enlisted oligarchs Roman Abramovich and Lev Leviev—both major patrons of Chabad—to establish the Federation of Jewish Communities of Russia (FJCR) under Chabad’s leadership. This move was part of a broader political strategy to undermine the existing Jewish leadership, particularly the Russian Jewish Congress, which had criticized Putin’s actions in Chechnya.

The Kremlin withdrew recognition from the previous chief rabbi, Adolf Shayevich, and instead endorsed Berel Lazar, creating a state-aligned Jewish leadership. In return, Chabad maintained political neutrality and avoided criticism of the government, aligning with its long-standing principle of working with regimes as long as Jews are not targeted.

Rabbi Berel Lazar, an American-born, Italy-raised Chabad emissary, has served as Russia’s chief rabbi since 2000 and is a frequent presence at Putin’s side during public events. He sits on Russia’s Public Chamber, a government advisory body, and has praised Putin as a “friend of the Jews,” calling Russia “one of the safest places for Jews in Europe.”

Lazar’s loyalty has been reciprocated with state funding for Chabad projects, including the $50 million Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center in Moscow, which opened in 2012. Putin himself donated a month of his salary to the project, and the FSB (KGB’s successor) contributed archival materials, underscoring the depth of state support.

Today, Chabad oversees the vast majority of Jewish religious life in Russia. According to Rabbi Alexander Boroda, head of the FJCR, 80% of synagogues in Russia are led by Chabad rabbis. The movement has restored dozens of synagogues, built community centers, and run educational and cultural programs.

Chabad’s evangelical approach—meeting Jews at their level of observance—has helped reconnect secular and unaffiliated Jews with their heritage. However, this dominance has come at the expense of other Jewish movements, such as Reform and Conservative Judaism, which have minimal presence in Russia.

 

Replies: @JunkyardDog, @israel shamir

Of course. The only thing that Jews HATE and fear deeply is historic Apostolic Christianity. They have no fear of Protestantism because they know that Judaizing is central to Protestantism, espcially to English-speaking Protestantism.

Nor do Jews fear Novus Ordo/Vatican II Catholicism, because it is the Church self-Protestantized not by doctrines but by pastoralism. In order to try tone fringy to the Modern world which is the fruit of Anglo-Saxon Protestant imperial power.

It is ether Christ and Christendom or else Chaos owned and controlled by Jews.

Great article, and awesome post!

[Jesus] Christ is the main defence against the Jews and their shabbos goyim.
 

Replies: @anonymous

Bullshit! What has Jeeeeezus ever done to stem the tide of White genocide? Name one instance where the christ critter intervened on behalf of White people to rid them of their oppressors. Your "savior" hasn't saved anything but jews; whilst making tens-of-millions of idiot whites his castrated sheep!

Replies: @rockatansky

Why people can’t acknowledge that Hitler attacked the USSR just out of blue?
 

It's preposterous.

Russia was ruled for many years by pro-US liberals, and every thing damaging to Russia was unsealed and presented.
 

and everything damaging to the Russian Czars was presented.

During this long orgy of self-destruction, no evidence of any sort proving that Josef Stalin planned an attack on Germany was found. None!
 

Exactly. None.

And yet there are still people who're defending Putin's decision to invade !

Stalin and the USSR leadership were quite fond of Nazi Germany at the time.
 

If Herr Hitler wouldn’t accept British instigations for real thing, if he wouldn’t attack Russia, he would live and die in peaceful old age. But alas, he rushed to Moscow and to his peril.
 

It seems that the present German chancellor is about to make the same mistake. And yes, he also claims that Putin will attack if he would not. So the old mistake is likely to be repeated.
 

An irony that I hope isn't lost on Vlad Putin.

Replies: @John Johnson

You write: "Why people can’t acknowledge that Hitler attacked the USSR just out of blue? Russia was ruled for many years by pro-US liberals, and every thing damaging to Russia was unsealed and presented. During this long orgy of self-destruction, no evidence of any sort proving that Josef Stalin planned an attack on Germany was found. None!"

My response: I will summarize some of the reasons why we know Stalin was preparing to attack Germany and all of Europe:

1. Stalin was moving approximately 24,000 tanks to his western front. Why did Stalin need so many tanks on his western front?

2. The Red Army lost 20,500 tanks between June and November 1941, amounting to 80% of its armored strength. (Source: McMeekin, Sean, Stalin’s War: A New History of World War II, New York: Basic Books, 2021, p. 381).

3. The Soviet Union built an entire family of BT tanks—the BT-2, BT-5, BT-7, BT-7A, and BT-7M. BT stands for bystrokhodnyi (high-speed) tank. At the beginning of World War II, the Red Army had 6,456 BT tanks, as many as all other operational tanks in the rest of the world. The BT tank’s most important characteristic–its speed–was achieved through the use of its wheels. The wheels of the BT tank made it impossible to use the BT tank successfully off the roads, or on the bad roads of the Soviet Union. In the battles fought on Soviet territory, thousands of BT tanks were abandoned. Historians say that Stalin’s BT tanks were not ready for war. This statement is not true. The BT tank was ready for an offensive war on German territory, but not in a defensive war fought on its own territory. (Source: Suvorov, Viktor, The Chief Culprit: Stalin’s Grand Design to Start World War II, Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2008, pp. 52-53).

4. The Soviet Union also built an outstanding family of amphibious tanks: the T-37A, T-38, and T-40. By June 22, 1941, the Soviet Union had over 4,000 amphibious tanks in its arsenal. The Soviet amphibious tanks in 1941 became unnecessary and played no role in the war. But the question remains: Why were the amphibious tanks developed and built? Why did Stalin need 4,000 amphibious tanks which could not be used in a defensive war? The obvious answer is that Stalin planned to use the amphibious tanks in a massive military invasion of Europe. (Source: Ibid., pp. 55-57).

5. Airborne assault troops were also part of Stalin’s plans. According to the official Communist Party newspaper, Pravda, on August 18, 1940, the Soviet Union had more than 1 million trained parachutists at the beginning of the war. Airborne assault troops can only be used during offensive operations and only in conjunction with regular troops advancing against the enemy.

6. The Red Army needed an air armada of transport planes and gliders to deliver hundreds of thousands of paratroopers. Soviet factories started the mass production of cargo gliders beginning in the spring of 1941. On April 23, 1941, Stalin and Molotov signed an order to accelerate the production of an 11-seat glider with a deadline of May 15, 1941, and of a 20-seat glider with a deadline of July 1, 1941. The gliders that were produced in the spring of 1941 had to be used by the latest in the early fall of 1941. Gliders had light and fragile bodies and wings and could not be parked outdoors. Keeping a huge cargo glider outdoors during fall winds and rains would harm it beyond repair. Since all available hangars were already full with previously produced gliders, the mass production of gliders in the spring of 1941 meant that they had to be used either in the summer of 1941 or early fall at the latest. (Source: Ibid., p. 76).

7. Cargo warplanes are used to deliver assault forces with parachutists to the enemy’s rear. Soviet war-transport aviation used the American Douglas DC-3, which was considered to be the best cargo plane in the world at the start of World War II, as its primary cargo plane. In 1938, the U.S. government sold to Stalin the production license and the necessary amount of the most complex equipment for the DC-3’s production. The Soviet Union also bought 20 DC-3s from the United States before the war. In 1939, the Soviet Union produced six identical DC-3 aircraft; in 1940, it produced 51 DC-3 aircraft; and in 1941, it produced 237 DC-3 aircraft. During the entire war 2,419 DC-3s or equivalent planes were produced in Soviet factories. (Source: Ibid., p. 77).

8. The Soviet gliders and transport planes would be easy prey for enemy fighters if the Soviet Union did not secure complete air superiority. The Red Army had to begin the war with a massive air attack and invasion against the enemy’s air bases. Tens of thousands of paratroopers could then be dropped to seize and control key bases and strategic sites. Any other scenario was not viable. Instead, it was Hitler who carried out a preemptive strike, and Stalin’s strategy to strike the first blow was aborted. The Soviet Union’s carefully designed plan to mount a massive air offensive followed by an assault of airborne troops had to be abandoned in the desperate rush to fight a defensive war. (Source: Ibid., pp. 77-78).

9. In the years 1937-1941, the Soviet Army grew five-fold, from 1.1 million to 5.5 million. This huge increase in the size of the Soviet Army was accomplished primarily by ratification of the universal military draft in the Soviet Union on Sept. 1, 1939. Several age groups were drafted into the Red Army at the same time; in essence, all of the young men in the country. The duration of army service for the majority of the draftees was two years, so the Soviet Union had to enter a major war within two years. If war did not start by then, all of the young people would have to go home on Sept. 1, 1941, and then there would be almost nobody left to draft. Stalin knew when he established the draft that in two years, in the summer of 1941, the Soviet Union must enter into a major war.

10. Stalin’s more than 200 submarines and the rest of his navy were ineffective at the start of the war because it was an attack fleet. Stalin’s navy was built for aggressive war and could not be used effectively in a defensive war.

11. The Ammunition Commissariat was created as a separate ministry to take care exclusively of the production of ammunition. This ministry had to determine where to locate all of the new factories that would be producing shells, gunpowder, cartridges, missiles, and other weapons. If Stalin had planned to conduct a defensive war, the new ammunition factories would have been built either behind the Volga River or even farther inland in the Ural Mountains. But no defensive options were ever discussed. Since Stalin planned to conduct an offensive operation into a war-devastated and weakened Europe, all of the new ammunition factories were built near the western border regions of the Soviet Union.

12. During the course of the Bessarabia campaign, the Soviet Union captured 141 locomotives, 1,866 covered train cars, 325 half-covered train cars, 45 platforms, 19 cisterns, 31 passenger cars, and two luggage cars. But this was not enough for Stalin. At the Soviet-Romanian talks in July 1940, Soviet representatives demanded that Romania return all captured mobile railroad units. On July 31, 1940, Romania agreed to transfer 175 locomotives and 4,375 cars to the Soviet Union by Aug. 25, 1940. None of these trains would have been needed in a defensive war. Stalin could only use these trains seized in Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina in an offensive war designed to take over all of Europe. (Source: Ibid., pp. 156-157).

13. On May 5, 1941, Stalin made it clear to his generals that the Soviet Union would be the aggressor in a war with Germany. At a banquet a Soviet general toasted Stalin’s peaceful foreign policy. Stalin intervened:

“Allow me to make a correction. A peaceful foreign policy secured peace in our country. A peaceful foreign policy is a good thing. For a while, we drew a line of defenses until we rearmed our army [and] supplied it with modern means of combat. Now, when our army has been rebuilt, our technology modernized, [now that we are] strong [enough] for combat, now we must shift from defense to offense. In conducting the defense of our country, we are compelled to act in an aggressive manner. From defense we have to shift to a military policy of offense. It is indispensable that we reform our training, our propaganda, our press to a mindset of offense. The Red Army is a modern army, and the modern army is an army of offense.”

The general who made the toast to Stalin’s peaceful foreign policy was discharged a few days after the banquet. (Source: Ibid., p. 205).

14. The Soviet Union was sending a massive amount of troops to the western border. This massive troop movement could not have been defensive. Troops preparing for defense dig themselves into the ground, close off roads, establish barbwire barriers, dig anti-tank trenches, and prepare covers behind the barricades. The Red Army did none of these things. Instead, the additional Soviet divisions began to hide in the border forests just like the German troops preparing for invasion. (Source: Ibid., pp. 207-217).

15. Suvorov also mentions that Soviet soldiers and officers were issued Russian-German and Russian-Romanian phrase books as part of their preparations for an invasion of Europe. Thousands of Soviet troops did not think to get rid of this compromising evidence when they were captured in the German invasion of the Soviet Union. The Russian-German phrase books were composed very simply: a question in Russian, followed by the same question in German written in Russian letters, then in German in Latin letters. If the Soviet soldier did not know how to pronounce the needed German phrase, he could point to the corresponding lines in the book and the Germans could read the lines themselves.

The phrases indicated that the Soviets were planning to conduct an offensive war in Europe. For example, some phrases asked: “Where is the burghermeister? Is there an observation point on the steeple?” There were no burghermeisters or steeples in the Soviet Union. These questions are relevant only if the Soviet soldiers were in Germany. Here are other examples: “Where is the fuel? Where is the garage? Where are the stores? Where is the water? Gather and bring here [so many] horses [farm animals], we will pay!” These questions and phrases would not be relevant on Soviet soil. The following phrases are also revealing: “You do not need to be afraid. The Red Army will come soon!” These phrases are not relevant for a war conducted on Soviet soil. (Source: Ibid., pp. 257-258).

16. Within less than a year, the Soviet Union destroyed a Japanese army in Mongolia, took over the eastern part of Poland by military force, conducted an extremely difficult and successful invasion of Finland, forced the Baltic nations of Estonia, Lithuania, and Latvia to join the Soviet Union against their will, and took possession of Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina from Romania. These Soviet military conquests and ultimatums expanded the Soviet Union’s territory by 426,000 square kilometers, approximately equal to the surface area of the German Reich in 1919. (Source: Hoffmann, Joachim, Stalin’s War of Extermination, 1941-1945: Planning, Realization, and Documentation, Capshaw, AL: Theses & Dissertations Press, 2001, p. 31).

17. After the division of Poland by the Soviet Union and Germany, Soviet troops could have created a powerful barrier on the new Soviet-German border. In 1939 conditions for defense along the Soviet-German border were highly favorable: forests, rivers, swamps, few roads, and lots of time. However, instead of making the area impassable, it was quickly made more penetrable. The Red Army tore down previously existing fortifications and buried them under mounds of ground. The Soviet Union also stopped producing anti-tank and anti-aircraft cannon. The Soviet Union had huge land mine production that could have been used for defense, but after the new borders with Germany were established this production was curbed.

18. The Red Army also dismantled the security pale created earlier on the old western borders, and failed to create a new security pale on the Polish territory annexed to the Soviet Union.

19. The Soviet Union also constructed new railroads and railroad bridges in the western border regions. Almost all railroad troops were concentrated in the western border regions. The railroad troops worked intensively to modernize old railroads and build new ones right up to the border. Simultaneously with the construction of railroads, automobile roads were built in the western regions. The Red Army was building railroads and roads from east to west, which is usually done when preparing for advance, for a quick transfer of reserves, and for further supplying the troops after they crossed the borders. All of this work was designed for offense and hurt the Soviet Union in a defensive war. When Germany attacked the Soviet Union, German troops used the roads, bridges, supplies, rails, and sectional bridges constructed by the Soviets in the western regions to aid their advance into Soviet territory.

20. From 1926 to 1937, the Soviet Union constructed 13 fortified regions along its western borders known unofficially as “the Stalin Line.” There were many differences between the Soviet Stalin Line and the French Maginot Line. Unlike the French Maginot Line, the Stalin Line was built in secrecy and not publicized. The Stalin Line was much deeper and was built not only to stop infantry, but mostly to stop tanks. The Soviets also used huge quantities of steel and granite boulders in addition to concrete. The Stalin Line was built from the Baltic Sea in the north to the Black Sea in the south and could not be bypassed. Finally, unlike the Maginot Line, the Stalin Line was not built at the very border, but further into Soviet territory.

The 13 fortified regions on the Stalin Line were built for defense and came at a tremendous cost in effort and money. Each fortified region was also a military formation that could independently conduct military operations during a long period of time and in isolated conditions. In 1938 it was decided to strengthen all 13 regions by building heavy artillery installations within them. The Soviet Union also started construction of eight more fortified regions. Then, when the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact created a common border between Germany and the Soviet Union, Stalin ordered further construction of the fortified regions to stop. The existing fortified regions were disarmed, and everything connected with defense was dismantled and destroyed.

20. The construction of a new line of fortified regions began during the summer of 1940 on the new Soviet-German border. These new regions were unofficially referred to as the Molotov Line, but they were never finished. The defense buildup on the new borders proceeded very slowly, while the destruction of the Stalin Line was surprisingly fast. When Germany attacked the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941, the Molotov Line was not yet built. Soviet generals and marshals after Stalin’s death expressed their anger. They asked: How could Stalin liquidate and disarm the fortified regions on the old borders without building the necessary defenses on the new western borders? The answer is that Stalin was not planning to fight on his territory; Stalin was planning an offensive war against all of Europe.

21. The records of a conference of the Soviet High Command held in Moscow from Dec. 23, 1940, through the evening of Dec. 31, 1940, also indicate that the Soviet Union was planning a massive offensive against Europe. This extremely secret meeting was attended by 274 of the highest-ranking leaders of the Red Army. Most of the speakers discussed the importance of the new tactics of sudden surprise attack. Defense at the primary locations of attack was not foreseen, even theoretically. The Soviet military leaders made it clear at the conference that they had no established contemporary defense theory. Soviet military leaders also did not work on questions of defense after the conference. The goal of the Red Army was to conduct grandiose sudden offensive operations that overwhelmed the enemy on its own territory.

22. During the German invasion of the Soviet Union in June 1941, Yakov Iosifovich Dzhugashvili, the son of Stalin, was taken prisoner by the Germans. Stalin’s son was searched and questioned. A letter dated June 11, 1941, was found in his pockets from another officer stating: “I am at the training camps. I would like to be home by fall, but the planned walk to Berlin might hinder this.” German intelligence officers asked Yakov Dzhugashvili to clarify the statement about the “planned walk to Berlin.” Stalin’s son read the letter and quietly muttered: “Damn it!” Obviously, the letter indicates that Soviet forces were planning to invade Germany later that year.

23. German intelligence officers also asked Stalin’s son why the Soviet artillery, which had the best cannon and howitzers in the world, fired so poorly. Stalin’s son truthfully answered: “The maps let the Red Army down, because the war, contrary to expectations, unfolded to the east of the state border.” The Soviet maps were of territories in which the Red Army planned to advance, and were useless for defending the country. Storages of topographic maps located unreasonably close to the border were either destroyed by the advancing German army or by the retreating Soviet forces. In 1941, the Red Army fought without maps, and the Soviet artillery could not fire accurately without maps.

24. Every Soviet commander, starting with regiment level and higher, had in his safe a so-called “Red Packet,” which contained the plans for war. When Germany invaded, the commanders opened their “Red Packets,” but they did not find in them anything useful for defense. The Red Army had neither prepared for defense nor conducted any training in defensive operations. The defensive operations of the Red Army in the summer of 1941 were pure improvisation.

25. Further evidence that the Soviet Union was planning to attack Germany is provided by Andrei Vlasov, a Soviet general who had been captured by the Germans. During a conversation in 1942 with SS Gen. Richard Hildebrandt, Vlasov was asked if and when Stalin had intended to attack Germany. Hildebrandt later stated: “Vlasov responded by saying that the attack was planned for August-September 1941. The Russians had been preparing the attack since the beginning of the year, which took quite a while because of the poor Russian railroad network. Hitler had sized up the situation entirely correctly, and had struck directly into the Russian buildup. This, said Vlasov, is the reason for the tremendous initial German successes.”

26. The Molotov-Ribbentrop pact began to unravel when Soviet Foreign Minister Molotov arrived in Berlin on November 12, 1940. Molotov presented to Hitler a long list of ridiculous territorial claims on behalf of the Soviet Union. Molotov demanded strongholds in Yugoslavia, in the Adriatic Sea, in Greece, in the Bosporus and Dardanelles, in the Persian Gulf; he demanded that countries south of the Baku-Batumi line, in the direction of the Persian Gulf, be given over to Soviet control, including eastern Turkey, northern Iran, and Iraq.

27. Hitler had been preparing for an invasion of Great Britain when Stalin demanded new territories in Europe–territories on which Germany’s economy and armed forces heavily depended. After Molotov’s departure, Hitler gathered his most trusted subordinates and clearly let them understand that he planned to invade the Soviet Union. (Source: Bassil Henry Liddel Hart, The second World War, Moscow: Voyenizdat, p. 145).

28. Suvorov states in “The Chief Culprit” that both German and Soviet forces were positioned for attack on June 22, 1941. The position of the divisions of the Red Army and the German army on the border mirrored each other. The airfields of both armies were moved all the way up to the border. From the defensive point of view, this kind of deployment of troops and airfields by both armies was stupid and suicidal. Whichever army attacked first would be able to easily encircle the troops of the other army. Hitler attacked first to enable German troops to trap and encircle the best units of the Red Army.

29. Hitler states toward the end of his speech on June 22, 1941 that he was invading the Soviet Union to prevent an attack on not only Germany, but all of Europe.

30. Gen. Heinz Guderian expressed his opinion after the war: “…The Russians would have won the war even without the help of their Western allies and would have occupied the whole of Europe. No power on earth could have stopped them.” (Source: Guderian, Heinz, Panzer Leader, New York: E. P. Dutton & Co., Inc., 1952, p. 283).

31) The Dnepr military flotilla was created in the early 1930s to prevent the establishment and crossing of temporary bridges across the river. The flotilla included 120 warships and motorboats, as well as its own air force with shoreline and air defense batteries. The Dnepr flotilla could securely close off the roads to the industrial regions in the south of Ukraine and to the Black Sea bases of the Soviet Navy. A German attack could be stopped on the Dnepr line, or at least held up for several months. However, when Hitler attacked France, Stalin ordered the removal of mines from the Dnepr river bridges and disbanded the military flotilla. The Dnepr flotilla could only be used in a defensive war on Soviet territory, and Stalin did not believe he needed it. (Source: Suvorov, Viktor, The Chief Culprit: Stalin’s Grand Design to Start World War II, Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2008, pp. 190-191).

Stalin divided the defensive Dnepr flotilla into two flotillas: the Danube flotilla and the Pinsk flotilla. The Danube flotilla would be useless in a defensive war. In an offensive war, however, the Danube flotilla could be deadly for Germany. It only had to sail 300 or 400 kilometers up the river to the strategically important bridge at Chernavoda, where it could disrupt the petroleum supply from Ploieşti to the port of Constanza. The entire German war machine could be stopped simply because German tanks, planes, and warships would be out of fuel. However, when Germany attacked the Soviet Union, the Danube flotilla found itself cut off from Soviet troops without the possibility of retreat. Most of its ships had to be sunk, while gigantic supplies were either destroyed or left behind. (Source: Ibid., pp. 191-192).

The Pinsk flotilla would also be difficult to use for defense. The Pinsk flotilla had 66 river warships and cutters, a squadron of airplanes, a company of marines, and other units. In the defensive war of 1941, the Soviets had to blow up and abandon all of the ships of the Pinsk flotilla. However, in a war of aggression, the Pinsk flotilla could have used the newly constructed canal from Pinsk to Kobrin, which would then allow its ships to reach the Vistula basin and head further west to the German rivers. In 1945, a Soviet admiral reached Berlin with his flotilla. (Source: Ibid., pp. 193-194).

32) The actions of the Red Army during the first days of the war speak best about Soviet intentions to conduct an offensive war. Up until June 30, 1941, Gen. Zhukov insisted on advance and demanded that commanders of Soviet forces aimed at Romania and Hungary exclusively attack. Zhukov stopped the attack only when he and his colleagues concluded that his armies could no longer advance. On June 22, 1941, several other Soviet commanders also followed prewar plans without awaiting orders from Moscow, and attacked the following regions: the Rava-Russkaya region, Tilzit in Eastern Prussia, and the Polish city of Suvalki. (Source: Ibid., p. 255).

33) The actions of the Soviet fleet during the first days of the war also show with sufficient clarity its plans for offense. On June 22, 1941, the submarines of the Baltic fleet sailed toward the shores of Germany with the objective of sinking all enemy ships and vessels according to the rules of unrestricted warfare. No exceptions were made, not even for medical vessels sailing under the Red Cross flag. Soviet submarines from the Black Sea fleet immediately sailed into the sea toward the shores of Romania, Bulgaria, and Turkey. On June 25 and 26, 1941, the Black Sea fleet’s cruisers carried out an intensive artillery raid in the vicinity of the Romanian port of Constanta. At the same time, the Danube military flotilla began an assault in the Danube river delta. The garrison of the Soviet naval base Hanko also conducted intensive assault operations during the beginning of the war, taking over 19 Finnish islands in the course of several days. (Source: Ibid., pp. 253-255).

34) The Soviet air force also acted in an aggressive manner at the start of the war. On June 25, 1941, despite losses suffered during the first days of the war, Soviet air forces bombed all known air fields of the southern part of Finland. On June 23, 1941, acting according to plans, the Soviet long-range bomber air force carried out a massive attack against military targets in Koenigsberg and Danzig. Soviet long-range bombers also began to bomb the Ploieşti oil fields in Romania on June 26, 1941. After a few days of raids, the amount of oil Germany obtained in Romania was reduced almost in half. If Hitler had not attacked first, the Soviet air force would have been much more dangerous, and could have totally paralyzed the entire German war effort through its strikes against the oil-producing regions. (Source: Ibid., p. 254).

35) If Stalin was preparing for a defensive war, he should have ordered his plane designers to create the best fighters in the world, capable of defending the skies over the Soviet Union. But fighters did not interest Stalin. Stalin ordered his fighter designer to drop all his work on the creation of a fighter and start developing a light bomber, named the Ivanov originally, and later the Su-2 in honor of its creator, P. O. Sukhoi.

36) The ideal combat plane Stalin developed was a light bomber designed to operate free of enemy resistance. Record-breaking characteristics were not required; Stalin demanded only simplicity, durability, and firepower. Stalin planned to create a plane that could be produced in numbers exceeding all warplanes of all types of all countries in the world. Literally, Stalin planned to build as many light bombers as there were small but mobile horsemen in the hordes of Genghis Kahn.

Germany carried out a preemptive strike on Soviet air bases when it invaded the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941. Hitler’s preemptive strike did not permit the Su-2 to do the work it was primarily designed to do. The Su-2 was ineffective and not needed in a defensive war. Production of 100,000 to 150,000 Su-2 planes had been planned for conditions in which the Red Army would deliver the first attack, and nobody would hinder production of the plane. Hitler’s invasion ruined Stalin’s plan. Production of the Su-2 was stopped, but the Soviet Union produced tens of thousands of planes later in the war that were much more complex in terms of production than the Su-2. (Source: Ibid., pp. 64-65).

37) The Soviet air force exceeded that of Germany both in plane quantity and plane quality at the start of the war. Suvorov asks: Why then in the first stage of the war did the Soviet air force lose air superiority from day one? The answer is that the majority of Soviet pilots, including fighter pilots, were not taught dogfighting. Soviet aviation was designed to conduct one grandiose, sudden, aggressive operation to crush the enemy’s air force on the ground in one raid and obtain air superiority. Hitler’s preemptive strike prevented Soviet aviation from accomplishing its planned aggressive operations of unheard-of dimensions. (Source: Ibid., pp. 69-72).

38) In the summer of 1940, Stalin brought Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania into the Soviet Union, and concentrated his forces in that region on the border of Eastern Prussia. The occupation of these Baltic countries by the Red Army made sense only if there were plans for an aggressive war against Germany. The Red Army transferred its air bases to the very front edge of the German border. From the air bases in Lithuania the Soviet air force could support the advance of Soviet troops to Berlin. The Soviet navy also transferred primary forces and reserves to naval bases established in Tallinn, Riga, and Liepāja. Since it was a short distance from Liepāja to the routes taken by German vessels carrying ore, nickel, and wood to Germany, a strike from this area could be sudden and devastating. (Source: Ibid., pp. 150-152).

39) On June 13, 1941, TASS broadcast that “Germany was following the conditions of the Soviet-German pact as flawlessly as the Soviet Union,” and that rumors of an impending German attack on the USSR “were clumsily fabricated propaganda by the enemies of Germany and the USSR, interested in broadening and prolonging the war.” The TASS announcement also stated, “Rumors that the USSR is preparing for war against Germany are false and provocative.…” However, the reality is that Soviet troops were already traveling to the western border. June 13, 1941, marked the beginning of the biggest organized movement of troops, arms, ammunition, and other military supplies in history.

For example, the First Strategic Echelon of the Red Army had 170 tank, motorized, cavalry, and rifle divisions. Fifty-six of them were already located right on the border and could not move any farther ahead. All of the remaining 114 divisions began to move toward the border in the wake of the reassuring TASS announcement on June 13, 1941.
Suvorov writes: “I have interviewed hundreds of people from that generation, and they all had forebodings of war. Where did they come from? They could not have known about Hitler’s preparations. They must have seen the preparations of the Red Army and understood that war was unavoidable…Between June 12 and June 15, all the western military districts were issued an order to move all deeply located divisions closer to the state borders.” (Source: Ibid., pp. 207-217).

40) Suvorov shows a picture of a Soviet 8-inch Howitzer B-4. He writes: “Each projectile weighed 220 pounds. These guns were used primarily for an offensive war in order to break hardened enemy defenses or during an assault on cities. By the summer of 1941 the Red Army had concentrated hundreds of them on the German border, each with a supply of 600 rounds of ammunition. In a defensive war, they proved to be of little use, until 1944 when the Red Army crossed into Germany for the final offensive during the war.”

41). In another picture, Suvorov writes: “The Red Army was trained to cross rivers, a key element in an offensive war. In a defensive war, a retreating army uses its own bridges and then destroys them.”

42). Suvorov writes in other pictures: “T-34 tanks, abandoned by the Red Army in the summer of 1941, fought under the German flag for the rest of the war…Even the best German Panzer divisions were using Soviet T-34 tanks.”

43). German soldiers soon found out the extent of the Soviet preparedness when they invaded the Soviet Union. A prime example is German pilot Hans-Ulrich Rudel, who flew a Ju-87 and completed 2,430 battle missions. He wrote shortly after the German invasion of the Soviet Union:

"While flying over these numerous airbases and fortifications, we all had the same thought in our heads--how lucky we were to have struck first. It seemed that the Soviets were feverishly readying the groundwork for an attack on us. And which other Western country could Russia have attacked? If the Russians had completed their preparations, there would have been almost no hope of stopping them..." (Source: Ibid., p. 252).

44). Marshal of the Soviet Union I. K. Bagramian said: “When I was studying the operational plans, I was struck by the following fact—our frontier army had neither a deployment nor a border-protection plan.” Bagramian said that during the training exercises only offensive tactics were worked on, and on the maps the war took place on German territory. (Source Ibid., p. 199).

Replies: @Rurik, @notanonymoushere, @Colin Wright, @Bankotsu, @Patrick McNally

Always this fanciful invention! Why people can’t acknowledge that Hitler attacked the USSR just out of blue?
 

Replies: @Dimitrie

Of course, you will. That's because you're a retard and a Zionist shill.

I’ll say even now, the Orange man is better than Biden, and better than Mrs Clinton.
 

With intermediaries over Qatar, it was probably an offer hard to refuse. And then they growed. The benefit for "Israel" is huge, with secular and religious fractions. A sure deviation from a two state solution resulting. With the collective west supporting the terrorist branding.

So they say. 'By way of deception thou shalt do war' (Mossad motto). It makes Hamas appear 'legit' in eyes of muslims/world.

Because murder is their religion.

People smuggle weapons into top security jails, too.
 

My question is not whether you personally know the details of how exactly Hamas smuggled the weapons. My question is whether it is imaginable that Hamas could have possibly done it in Gaza without Israel's knowledge and cooperation. I consider the probability of that to be extremely unlikely. Like one in a million chance. I think it cannot be done no matter what you try, and I think any reasonable person would come to the same conclusion after some consideration.

Replies: @Anonymous534, @John Johnson, @muh muh

Yes, this was a Hamas deal but they saw the handwriting of their future on the wall. Yes, they finally had enough and knew the consequences knowing the Jews.

By all means, their action led to more suffering than even the Palestinians expected but yes it showed even the dense West true Jewish ruthlessness.

Congratulations on a very good article and for reminding us of what led up to the events of 10/7, especially the cruel gunning down of peaceful protestors.

Nevertheless, I think here must have been collusion between the two parties, given how easy it was for HAMAS to penetrate the fence and overwhelm the Israelis on the other side. You correctly point out that much of the official reports, like the alleged crimes against women, babies, etc. are fake but then much else could be fake too.

Still I think the article is good as it stands, based on what is mostly the officially accepted portrayal of events, rather than on speculation about things we can't prove for sure.

Replies: @threadhopper

Can you explain the logistics of how Hamas smuggles weapons and ammunition to "the prison of Gaza", "over the barbed wire and mine fields" without Israel's full knowledge or assistance?

And if it is done with Israel's full knowledge and assistance, what agency could Hamas possibly have if it were funded, supplied and armed by Israel?

"Hamas leader's daughter treated at Tel Aviv hospital

A daughter of Gazan Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh was treated this month at a Tel Aviv hospital, according to reports."

https://www.worldjewishcongress.org/en/news/hamas-leader-s-daughter-treated-at-tel-aviv-hospital

20 Oct 2014. Bizarre.

"Israeli Hospital Treated Hamas Leader’s Relative as Terrorist Group Launched Thousands of Rockets: Report"

https://www.algemeiner.com/2021/05/27/israeli-hospital-treated-hamas-leaders-relative-as-the-terrorist-group-launched-thousands-of-rockets-report/

Bizarre again. That's from 2021.

"Top leaders of Hamas and others in their circle have benefitted in a real way from Israeli medical expertise. Yahya Sinwar, who is currently the Hamas leader in Gaza, but in 2008 was an Israeli prisoner, had a brain tumor removed by Israeli doctors at an Israeli hospital, saving his life.

Over a period of seven years, the daughter of Ismail Haniyeh (a senior Hamas leader), his mother-in-law and one-year-old granddaughter all received medical care at hospitals in Tel Aviv. His niece was treated for cancer at Ichilov Hospital. In 2014, the sister of Hamas leader Moussa abu Marzouk was also treated in Israel for cancer."

https://www.bnaibrith.org/oped-the-vile-treachery-of-hamas-leaders/

So, Israel, a genocidal terrorist entity, an entity that has shown itself to be so evil that it's comical, provided medical help to Hamas leadership? And Israel also financed Hamas? And despite Gaza being an open air concentration camp with the most well-guarded border on the planet Hamas was able to smuggle weapons and ammunition into Gaza under Israel's nose and in quantities sufficient to sustain a two-year fight against Israel?

I'm not sure how much agency does Hamas really have. It seems more like an Israeli proxy to me. A proxy created by Israel so that Israel would have a justification to do what's it's currently doing in Gaza.

Replies: @israel shamir, @Commentator Mike

I was going to make a similar comment, so since I have a little to add, still will.

Although it's largely been ignored since late 2023, the Gaza breakout squads did quite well against their military targets, in particular executing some quite senior officers.

The role of the Hannibal doctrine in the 1,200+
death toll was immense. People from at least three kibbutzes reported being attacked by Israeli tanks and possibly artillery. Photographic evidence of this was also on display: the kind of damage that would not be possible with the small arms that the Gaza breakout squads were carrying.

The most spectacular photographic evidence on that point was from car-park alley (or graveyard with cars) near the Nova rave. Dozens of cars clearly hit by heavy weapons from attack helicopters. I doubt that the Gaza breakout squads were anywhere near the cars; they were just occupied by jewish ravers trying to get out of there.

Of course, with state secrets and narrative control, a precise breakdown of the 1,200+ deaths is not possible (although I suspect that a dedicated and honest researcher in Israel would be able to do something like it).

My estimates from information at the time: at least half, and up to two-thirds or more of the 1,200+ were victims of an out-of-control application of the Hannibal doctrine.

Of the remainder (killed by the breakout squads), at least many score and possibly in the low hundreds were IOF personnel executed in the successful raids on IOF bases.

Replies: @Kingsmeg

Only problem is, Hamas is an Israeli creation, serving their interests.

https://www.analystnews.org/posts/how-israel-helped-prop-up-hamas-for-decades

Replies: @israel shamir, @Avery

At the very least it was allowed to happen. They pierced the concentration camp fence in nineteen places, yet it was the most secure such barrier ever erected. Even stray cats were picked up, and no doubt exterminated by one of the remotely controlled robotic mini-guns that policed the border, if they came too close.
Moreover, the Judenreich had been warned by numerous others that a break-out was coming. It gave the excuse for Satan-yahoo to invoke the Amalek Doctrine, and for the slaughter to begin. It's a 'New Purim', set to become another Judaic 'holiday' celebrating genocide.

Replies: @notanonymousHere, @skrik

Thank you for your thoughtful reply.

And thank you for this powerful article, which may give some Jews pause, and perchance a moment to reflect on their own values.

Peace, and God bless.

Mr Shmear,

Nice try but your argument does not wash. First of all Christians and Communists have perpetrated many atrocities. Since we’re talking about the Middle Ages why don’t you remind us of how the Crusaders slaughtered Jewish communities across Europe on their way to the Holy Land. And when they got to Jerusalem they killed so many Jews and Muslims that it was claimed that their horses were up to their bridles in blood.

You’re making the same mistake Vanunu made when he ran to London with his incriminating photographs of Dimona thinking that the Brits, themselves in possession of nuclear weapons, would somehow magically intervene to turn the Middle East into a nuclear free zone. Vanunu was an idiot thinking that the Brits and the Americans were somehow more moral in this regard than the Israelis. I would venture to say you are making the same mistake. Just consider how your idol Putin has abandoned every ally in the Middle East that he promised to support. He had the Russian military sitting inside Syria for 10 years allowing the Israelis to bomb indiscriminately.

Give it up my friend. There’s no goy you can rely on, apart from Christian Zionos busy Making Israel Great Again. Check out US ambassador and Christian Zionist fanatic Mike Huckabee at 6:50 applying a verse in Luke about Jews recognizing Jesus as the Messiah to today's Antichrist State of Israel. Considering that your friend Putin is a lying sack of shyte, you're better off hitching your wagon to the Christian Zionists. At least their lies are beneficial to the Jews:
https://youtu.be/MUtyl0mk-3o

Replies: @israel shamir, @Skeptikal

With all due respect, Mr Shmear, you did not stop being a Jew when you were baptized. Our friend Hitler saw Jews as a race and that does not end with baptism. Many of the Jews Hitler persecuted had converted to Catholicism or Lutheranism. My own experience since I was baptized 25 years ago is always to be seen as a Jew no matter what kind of church I attend. And no matter how much I repudiated Christian Zionism I was always identified as a Jew. The experience of Jews in Spain and later in Germany invalidates your claim that you cease to be a Jew when you are baptized. That is such a ridiculous and stupid claim that it’s hard to believe any serious thinker could make it. 25 years after my baptism I’ve learned a very hard lesson. Much as I wanted to stop being identified as a Jew and to become part of a single homogenized One New Man in Christ, I now see that was a foolish and delusional aspiration. We will always be seen as Jews by the world. And we have a choice of being a proud Jew or a self-hating schmuck Jew.

Replies: @Commentator Mike, @israel shamir, @IreneAthena, @Michael Korn, @mulga mumblebrain, @Craig Nelsen, @Passing by, @Commentator Mike

Suggest you and others listen to this interview that CNN scored with the current Hamas leader. He shows no remorse over the loss of tens of thousands of Gazan lives either. So why should anyone else?

'Do you accept any responsibility?': CNN presses Hamas leader on suffering in Gaza
In a wide-ranging interview, CNN’s Jeremy Diamond presses senior Hamas leader, Ghazi Hamad, on his responsibility for Palestinians suffering in Gaza and the state of the remaining hostages in the enclave.
05:52 • Source: CNN
25 Sep 2025
https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/25/world/video/ghazi-hamad-palestinians-hostages-gaza-diamond-dnt-digvid
 

Replies: @mulga mumblebrain, @Thomas Faber, @Prudentia, @Bama, @ThreeCranes

The American Pravda series has been invaluable. It seems to me it's now time for our culture to seriously look at the final Talmud domino - the Holocaust Conspiracy.
American Pravda: Holocaust Denial
https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/

Drawn from this excellent piece is: Benjamin Satanyahu is the best fried Hamas could ever have

God bless Israel Shamir and Ron Unz. I believe that Shamir is religiously now Russian Orthodox. I pray that Ron Unz joins him in either that historic Apostolic Church or else more generally in booming Traditional Latin Mass Catholic.

Christ and Christendom are the only path away from this horror show.

A year ago I posted a comment on my opinion on the blood libel: https://www.unz.com/article/germany-destroyed/?showcomments#comment-6690894
When a Jewish degenerate tells lies to Gentiles, they want to hear, and they applaud this bullshit, that leads me to the most apparent conclusion: They are all Shabbos Goyim.

Regretably, but very predictably, in Arsetralia the genocide has evoked hysterical support from elements of the Federal Opposition, and the Murdoch MSM cancer, from its flag-shit the 'Israelian' down to the abominable depths of 'SkyNews'. Central, of course, is the Judaic race hatred that sees Jewish lives as 'infinitely precious' and 'goy' lives as WORTHLESS. For Judaic insert 'Western' and for 'goy' insert 'the global niggers' and you have the Great Clash of Civilizations Race War, here at last.

Agree.

I very simple logical axiom---"If A = B and C= B, then A = C"--- now reveals all "blood libel" types of accusations to be, actually, confessions.

Love your books man, but that’s not really what this article is about.

That isn't the half of it. You will note that, like most everyone else, this author participates in memory-holing the most consequential figure -- big gay Obama. During his two (plus one) terms he set most everyone at each other's throats, but the Jews had pride of place in that he began to do so immediately after taking power.

Remember, until Strange and Sinister Obama, polling of American and Israeli Jews on the POTUS was roughly correlated. With Obama, Israeli Jews feared and loathed him with good reason. The Obama gang made it clear to American Jews, who occupy a central place in the Democrat Party and government, that they would be driven out unless they were loyal to Obama.

All subtlety was lifted with JCPOA when the New York Times published a front page article. including photos of Jews in Congress that Obama deemed disloyal.

These fissures only grew as ever more resources were committed to Color Revolution in Israel. Give the devils their due, they came rather close to imposing the Israeli version of Obama's our democracy, with a leftist supreme court acting as its Guardian Council akin to Iran's with its not so supreme leader.

Agree, the article is shallow and full of mis-characterisations.

“neoconservatives”– “neocons.” Their original roots can be traced back to the 1970s, when Democrats led by US Senator Henry “Scoop” Jackson parted paths with the anti-war New Left Democrats
 

Max Shachtman was the most prominent of them, and Leo Strauss is in his direct ideological lineage.

'Screw this rubbish, we'll have more influence as Cold Warriors.' was the basic line of thinking.

NO, a million times a million NO!!!!!!!!! The problem that stands today is the same problem that stood two thousand year ago no understanding of what an analogy to the literal is. Or how God uses the history of the past to explain future events. A prime example of this is chapter 37 of Ezekiel about the Valley of Dry Bones. It is one of the most egregious errors of Biblical Exegesis that this portion of scripture relates to the founding of Israel in 1948. Nothing could be further from the truth and how can we know this? Easy!!!

Therefore prophesy and say to them: ‘This is what the Sovereign Lord says: My people, I am going to open your graves and bring you up from them; I will bring you back to the land of Israel. 13 Then you, my people, will know that I am the Lord, when I open your graves and bring you up from them. 14 I will put my Spirit in you and you will live, and I will settle you in your own land. Then you will know that I the Lord have spoken, and I have done it, declares the Lord.’”

What starts off as a picture or analogy ends with the literal resurrection of the dead and if one knows their history guess what? Right here it is talking prophesying about Christ Jesus and then guess what? Pentecost!!!! Further to this we have this in two parts with the final in gathering of Israel to occur when the last resurrection takes place and Christ sets up His mil lineal kingdom in His city JERUSALEM!!! Chjiliasm which was condemned by the Idiotic Church Fathers is in fact totally and completely true!!!!!

And if this doesn't bring up the most egregious error of them all the prophecy of Gog and Magog of Ezekiel 38 and 39 which has got nothing to do with either Russia or Germany but because of WW1 And WW2 and the rise of communism and fascism we find ourselves in the quagmire.

Look people that the Book of Revelation mentions Gog and Magog only means that we were given the final interpretation and guess wyhat that battle happens after the 1000 year, chiliasm, of Christs kingdom on earth!!! And get this it has nothing whatsoever to do with the Jewish people nothing!!!! they are destroyed for little more than treason which is what Gog and Magog were traitors! how do we know that? simple Satan is released from his prison meaning it is some kind of test for that generation of humankind.

The OT is of paramount importance to the religion of Christianity how could it not be? But wow did we ever get the interpretation all wrong thank you Orthodox!!!!!! If they got chiliasm right two thousand years ago the Christian Zionists of today wouldn't have had a leg to stand on!!!!!

Church Fathers! We are two thousand years removed from them with seminaries and colleges galore and helps thousands of helps and we still can't get anything right? And when someo0ne comes along who sees the errors he gets what the silent treatment and laughed at. God needs to clean house of all of the fakes and as i once heard from a Pastor the pulpit isn't a career choice its a calling!! University educated? More like educated know nothings! Jesus please help us and judge your Church! Remove all the fools please!!!!!!!!!!!

For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God? 1 Peter 4:17

Jews like material world
 

jews (authentic jews of the Zionist agenda) are ultimately about delivering the Antichrist via Satanism. They're spiritually corrupt and evil, just as are their Islamofascist brethren.

If the jews were merely all about a Globalist New World Order and financial hegemony, they could have continued to maneuver within the West and managed the cattle from there, and would never have set up the blatantly Judeofascist state of Israel, which is now showing its true colors; they would have continued to do their worst from within Marxism.

"Christian" Marxist jews are very much a junior partner in ZOG. Maybe knowingly, maybe unknowingly, but they're part and parcel. They're basically the flip side of "Christian" Zionist jews.

You think a "materialist" jew like Blackrock's Larry Fink needs a PR headache like Isra-hell? You think a jew billionaire like Peter Thiel needs it? But they haven't waivered in their Zionism, even as Isra-hell goes more and more off the rails, and deliberately continues to poke humanity in the eye, and deliberately continues to alienate wogs all over the world.

This is because they've sworn their fidelity to Satanism, and will pursue it until the end.

Only Jesus Christ broke the kikes, and he broke the wogs, too. Christendom nearly broke them both on the way to reforming the world.

This is why they set up Marxism -- to steal Christendom's humanitarian, carrot and stick thunder and initiate their agenda of Bolshevik mass murder. This is why for many decades since the second world war they've pursued Marxist-Zionism, gradually acclimating the world to Satanism.
https://rense.com/general87/century.htm

But they've already played the Marxist card, which is why it can't be played again.
https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html

David Berkowitz Son of Hope:

https://www.ariseandshine.org/
https://www.ariseandshine.org/updates
https://www.ariseandshine.org/where-is-david-berkowitz-former-son-of-sam-now.html
https://www.ariseandshine.org/contact.html
[email protected]
https://www.ariseandshine.org/uploads/4/9/9/2/49921295/editor/img-7800.jpg

 

Catholics also have the ten commandments and they are not Talmudic as they are for Jews

The Catholic liturgical scholar , Don Prosper Gueranger, in “The liturgical year” rightly points out that Pentecost was a Jewish Pentecost as all of the initial Catholics were Jews

In Acts of The Apostles, there is not only the famous speech of the first Pope, Peter, on Pentecost where he twice publicly accuses the Jews of killing Christ, there are example after example of Pope and Apostles (succeeded by Bishops) going to temple and synagogues, and even homes, to preach Christ and conversion

Sadly, modern popes and bishops no longer actualise the great commission but that is a mortal sin on them for as the New Testament teaches “Woe to me if I do not preach the Gospel.”

"the Jewry after Second century AD has very little in common with Judaism before Christ. They took its name, but little else."

No kidding. The Deuteronomy was penned when?

Replies: @Dimitrie

From the "squared circle society"--a TIE. Donald was great friends with Hulk Hogan and GWB liked pro wrestling and on September 10, 2001 in the Big Apple Monday action....The Undertaker and Diesel defeated the Towers of Doom. Next day--BBC announced Building 7 falling 45 minutes ahead of the Fire Chief stating "We decided to pull it" ( Building 7) and news hit Miami where GWB was reading My Pet Goat to a kindergarten class and back in the Big Apple- Marvin Bush was in charge of Security at the World Trade Center.... Therefore a TIE !!! DT and GWB---that Count 1 2 3 !!!

Is Trump in your view less intelligent than Bush Jr?
 

Moreover, the 47th had (and still has) the chance to back off even a bit and give diplomacy a chance, but he, for some reason, seems uninterested in diplomacy and what comes with it to the detriment of the many, including his fans. Therefore, I think we, the people, owe Dubya an apology, and a big one for staying out of that war.

" They [the Jews]appeared on the historical scene as the response to success of Christianity. I can compare response of Jews with Counter- Reformation."

You have it upside down, Mr Shamir. Why? Surely you are not THAT ignorant of history.
Christianity "appeared on the historical scene" as the response/revolt against judaism in all its basic amoral tenets. So maybe you think Judaism existed waiting for Jews to "appear on the historical scene and adopt it? And Christianity arose in revolt against a tribal ideology that had no followers yet???!!

Replies: @israel shamir, @Dimitrie

Thank you for the reply.

Indeed, the internet has opened my eyes to the fact that organized Jewry (though obviously not a great many "ordinary" Jews) combats the Cross - and the White race.

Just to be clear, not suggesting the latter two are synonymous.

Thank you Mr Shamir for this article.

You have shown that Jews hate Christianity and Jesus. But why do they hate? What is the source of this hatred? Maybe this can be topic of your next article. What are the political, religious and philosophical doctrines and arguments for hating Christianity and Jesus?

Replies: @israel shamir

Not since Vatican II council. As far as my own experience tells, each time I am interested in some interesting exotic spirituality, I am told by most Jews why I don't go back to my native religion (under their control). In Israel they are very welcoming to American Zio-Christians as well as to orders such as Mother Teresa's. What they cannot stand is Christianity of local origin or of integrist chapels that still stick to antisemitics.

Thank you ישראל for writing this courageous article. A couple of quibbles:

The modern Jewish apologists, hesitantly adopted by the church, preferred to put the blame on the Romans. But the medieval Jew did not wish to pass the buck. He tried to prove that Jesus had to be killed, and he was proud of killing Him. The Jews hated and despised Christ and Christians.
 

Also 16-17, 64, 73-74 here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CGD6LJZrRca_1GTuNDtMfRcJZ95GYZUq/view?usp=drivesdk

Prof. Dan added that there is little place to doubt that the Jewish enemies of Jesus caused his execution. Even today, Jews in Israel refer to Jesus by the demeaning word ‘Yeshu’ (instead of ‘Yeshua’) meaning ‘perish his name’. In a similar pun, the Gospel is called ‘Avon Gilaion’, the booklet of Sin. These are the endearing feelings towards Christ of the friends of Christian Zionists.
 

The name of Christ glorifies the golden edifice of Haram al-Sharif.
 

From my study of the Quran, while it does admire the Virgin Mary and accepts the Virgin Birth of Jesus, it omits all of Jesus's mature teachings as an adult, his miracles of healing and raising people from the dead, as well as the Crucifixion and Resurrection, which St Paul says are the foundation of Christianity. Instead the Quran entertains us with trivial tales of prankster miracles done by the child Jesus during the family's exile in Egypt, as reported in some of the Gnostic gospels. In other words the Quran's Jesus is irrelevant to the salvation of the world:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1t3z7n-v9Z3c1dXcMsy_wSbRRPdHAiWEg/view?usp=drivesdk

Finally you say that Islam accepts the Immaculate Conception. I don't think this is true. The Immaculate Conception refers to the birth of the Virgin Mary who Catholics believe was born without the stain of Original Sin from Adam and Eve. The birth of Jesus is called the Virgin Birth not the Immaculate Conception. That is what the Quran affirms but not Immaculate Conception of Mary herself. The Quran does not believe any human could be sinless, and certainly not Muhammad himself!

I hope ardent Christian Zionist Unz commenter A123 opines here. It will be good to see the two of you in dialogue. I have designated him Abraham123 founder of the one two and three monotheistic religions. My Hope is that he will find elements of good in Islam commensurate with his praise and love for antichrist Jews and Judaism.

Finally I would challenge you to explain why the Catholic Church that reigned supreme over Medieval Europe chose to tolerate the presence of anti-Christian Jews there? Similarly you might delve into the great puzzle of why Pope Pius XII, the world war II Pope, reversed the anti-Zionist stance of his predecessors Popes Pius X and Benedict XV and embraced the Zionist cause, as well as Jewish interests in general, as explained in this book by Catholic law professor Ronald Rychlak:
https://home.olemiss.edu/~rrychlak/

Hoping you enjoy this inspirational Orthodox Christian chant:
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLo7j_tYDFySLLPjwguv6smLyEOirMR8zH
 

Replies: @israel shamir, @anarchyst

smartest little observation right here

Thank you Mr. Shamir, for that information, but it seems to contradict other information.

We all know ((Wiki)) isn't valid for controversial subjects, but it says Russia has "legislation in place criminalising Holocaust denial".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_Holocaust_denial

were these laws

https://forward.com/fast-forward/197664/holocaust-deniers-in-russia-now-face-five-years-in/

https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-criminalizes-nazi-denial/25373990.html

officially repealed?

watch, (if you can) this execrable exercise in rancid hypocrisy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCQ66RS3gQc

Everything bad that happened during WWII was *all* Germany's fault. Russia and the Bolsheviks/Soviets were a pure and innocent as angels, and even more so, because they even forgave Germany for being sooo evil.

It's pure Jewish, 'Holocaust' narrative, spewed with sanctimonious venom, as if Russia and the Soviets were pure as the driven snow.

check her out as seven minutes, 'they categorized people based on ethnicity, and who was allowed to live, or be slaves, or killed immediately'.

Now try to square that with what Russia did during Operation Keelhaul, or at Katyn, (or the Holodomor, for God's sake!), or a thousand other outrages against decency or human rights, and you would think that woman is insane.

But the true irony, is at 4:10, when she say "Today from official Berlin, we hear calls for the destruction of our statehood"

does she have the slightest idea of the irony of that?

The Jews who controlled Russia, and from Moscow menaced and threatened the entire region, (forcing Germany to respond to that threat),

Are now in Berlin, and menacing Russia, and forcing Russia to respond to that threat.

But to underscore the nefarious power of 'the Jew', in both cases, Germany is be blamed for it all,
when the Jews controlled Russia in the 1920s and 30s, and now today, when the Jews control Germany.

Russia, of course is absolutely innocent, and the Jews are absolutely innocent.

This is the kind of rank hypocrisy that is driving the war in Ukraine, and driving Sweden and Finland into ((NATO)), because Russia will go to nuclear war, before they'll ever admit to any guilt on their part for WWII.

And I find that disgusting.

Sorry to get to ranting and frothing, Mr. Shamir, but I seem to do that from time to time.

Perhaps you can question the holy six million, and soap and lampshades in Russia, but you're not allowed to point out the things I just did here in this comment.

Replies: @Commentator Mike

Al Arabiya is the voice of the Saudi Royal Government, which tries to straddle between the
US and Israel on one hand, but without completely alienating the "Arab Street" and inciting a
revolt against the Arab Monarchs. This is a precarious strategy, ultimately doomed,
but it's all you can do while riding two wild horses at the same time.
All the best to you, Mr. Shamir!

Russian Rullet with hand grenades. Gagaga

Late Mr Prigozhin was a very loyal to Putin man.

Who fought Russian forces in what looked like an insurrection where he changed his mind.

Not something you can reverse.

Even prone to conspiracy Russians do not think Putin ordered to kill this brave soldier.

So you believe Putin's story that he died in a tragic accident involving vodka and hand grenades?

If you are going to take a run at the king then you need to kill him.

That is the only lesson.

Prigozhin most likely had a death wish. There are some really weird stories about him. A very sick and twisted person but was probably the only honest general that Putin had.

Russia supplied Iran with air defence and with missile technology.
 

An Iranian official has made unprecedented allegations against Russia, accusing it of providing information to Israel on air defense sites.

Mohammad Sadr, a member of Iran’s Expediency Discernment Council, reportedly said in press statements on Sunday evening that “Russia provided Israel with information about Iran’s air defense sites.”
He added that “this war proved the strategic alliance with Moscow is worthless,” referring to the 12-day conflict between Iran and Israel last June.
 

Replies: @israel shamir, @gT

Before I can respond you will have to explain what you mean by occupying power.

And No. Russia is not permitting the country's in the region to go their own way, unless they are members of NATO.

Even the nets pilot system suggests that they act independently. But that is of course blatantly false. The impression is one of independence, but in reality unless aid states serve Russian security expectations they are no independent. Now I want to make sure that I acknowledge influence as part of any equation. The US has invaded the any the previous countries she aided in their bid for independence simply because they chose become closer with China. Russia on the other hand has threatened and engaged in military coercion to ensure that states abide by Russian demands.

As South Korea moves to reunite with N. Korea,. despite opposing said action that would end a democratic state --- the US is not going to threaten S. Korea with war. Independence is Mexico dancing with Chinese Communists and the Current Russian state with very little comment even from the US.

Independence is Mexican troops seizing US troops by force on the US side of the border and the president and Congress with no response -- because they assume it was all just a mistake instead of a test.

That is what independence looks like. You won't see anything of the kind coming out the Eastern lock -- Russia's sphere of influence.

The United States is not an "occupying power in Germany and Japan". The military occupation of Germany and Japan was stipulated in the surrender agreement, and ended in 1952. I have a lot more to say on this subject if you insist on batting it around.