Oh yeah, who wouldn't want to move to Russia where denying the 'Hoaxlocaust' gets you 5 years in some prison, where an annual international 'Anti-Fascist Conference' is held & where some Jew named Boris Spiegel is the chairman of a government agency called 'World Without Nazism'. Get me my plane ticket.Replies: @Protogonus, @Currdog73
If I were not old as I am, I would immediately move to Russia.
How does this dip shit manage to be the first commenter on every thread on TUR?
And what about Serbia? Did Serbia not have the right to defend its border? Apparently not. For 72 days, NATO countries led by the US bombed Serbia’s civilians to enforce the so-called independence of Kosovo …
Thank you mentioning this! Here’s some extra info.
Re occupied Serbia’s Province of Kosovo
Of course, the term “Kosovo War” they use is a NATO/MSM propaganda term – to hide illegal and criminal war against the entire country (Orthodox Christian Serbia) by mass murdering NATO (aka Joint Criminal Enterprise) involving Bill Clinton (aka Butcher of the Balkans), Wesley Clark (7 Muslim countries in 5 years) and poor Madeline Albright, with the plan to steal Serbia’s Province of Kosovo, as that is a cradle of Orthodox Christianity, with 1,600 churches and monasteries. Primitive Muslim Shqiptars aka Albanians aka Kosovars, so far have destroyed/desecrated around 200 of them.
Again, the term “Kosovo War” is actually MSM/NATO bait-and-switch trap, which they invented to slowly move away from the proper term, as I mentioned, war on the Orthodox Christian Serbia, which was illegal and criminal as not approved by UN!
Here’s even USA describing Albanians as terrorists and separatists [1][2][3] and biggest drug dealers in Europe [4][5]. Of course, until they became ‘freedom fighters’ (TM).
Land theft is their main business with full support from NATO, not because they have any right to it, but because you are their useful murderers, butchers, and thieves, and NATO uses territories they steal for their military bases – like Camp Bondsteel!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
More than 200 Serbian Orthodox Christian Churches destroyed/vandalized [6] and 90,000 Serbian Orthodox Christian graves vandalized [7] in Occupied Kosovo, by these savages, i.e. primitive Muslim Shqiptars aka Albanians!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[1] H.R.2203 – 114th Congress (2015-2016): To remove the Kosovo Liberation Army from treatment as a terrorist organization, and for other purposes. | Congress.gov | Library of Congress:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/2203
[2] Dec 2022 | Kosovo’s separatist leaders pose with Greater Albania map
—
[3] Greater Albania Map – Wikimedia Commons:
—
[4] The Rise and Rise of Britain’s Albanian Coke Dealers | Vice
https://www.vice.com/en/2017/08/21/the-rise-and-rise-of-britains-albanian-coke-dealers/
[5] Albanian gangsters running UK cocaine market but one ‘protected’ city won’t let them in – Mirror Online
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/albanian-gangsters-running-uk-cocaine-28952848
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[6] Google Image Search: Desecrated Serbian Orthodox Christian Churches in Occupied Kosovo
https://www.google.com/search?q=(desecrated+OR+destroyed+OR+burned)+serbian+churches+kosovo+-racak&tbm=isch
[7] Google Image Search: Desecrated Serbian Orthodox Christian Cemeteries in Occupied Kosovo
https://www.google.com/search?q=desecrated+serbian+cemetery+kosovo+-racak&tbm=isch
[8] 2004 Destruction of Serbian Orthodox Church (Church of St. Elijah, Podujevo)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_St._Elijah,_Podujevo
[9] Since 1999, numerous Serbian Orthodox cemeteries in Kosovo have been extensively and severely vandalized.
https://twitter.com/SRBinHolySee/status/1766743380606734518
—
—
—
[10] Destruction of Serbian cultural heritage in Kosovo and Metohija – YouTube
Muslim Shqiptars aka Albanians in Occupied Kosovo | YouTube (<3 min video)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[11] The Empire Bombed Serbia to Seize Kosovo in 1999 – YouTube
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1000+ Anon001 Comments Archive @ The Unz Review | TUR
https://www.unz.com/comments/all/?commenterfilter=anon001
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If I were not as old as I am, I would immediately move to Russia.
Why? Is it because Putin knew and met Epstein! [1] Yes, you read that right!
[1] Wikileaks Group’s Leaked Emails Reveal Putin’s Personal Relationship With Jeffrey Epstein | Rurik Skywalker / Rolo Slavskiy Substack | Nov-2025
https://slavlandchronicles.substack.com/p/wikileaks-groups-leaked-emails-reveal
Excerpt from [1]: The trove of emails, exchanged at the height of the Syrian civil war between 2013 and 2016, reveal Epstein’s successful efforts to secure a private meeting between Barak and Russian President Vladimir Putin to discuss a Russian-brokered end to the conflict, including winning Russian support for a negotiated removal of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
Excerpt from [1]: Epstein once bragged to a journalist that he “often flew to Moscow to see Vladimir Putin,” and enjoyed close ties with Russian business and political elites. The American financier specialized in moving money across borders, and his expertise would be useful in stemming capital flight from Russia amid Putin’s crackdown on “foreign agents.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1000+ Anon001 Comments Archive @ The Unz Review | TUR
https://www.unz.com/comments/all/?commenterfilter=anon001
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So England exists because of the collapse of the British Empire. Yours is the next Nobel Prize.
Oh yeah, who wouldn't want to move to Russia where denying the 'Hoaxlocaust' gets you 5 years in some prison, where an annual international 'Anti-Fascist Conference' is held & where some Jew named Boris Spiegel is the chairman of a government agency called 'World Without Nazism'. Get me my plane ticket.Replies: @Protogonus, @Currdog73
If I were not old as I am, I would immediately move to Russia.
Apparently it is true that in May 2014, President Putin signed a law, known as the “Law Against the Rehabilitation of Nazism,” which introduced Article 354.1 into the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. This law among other things criminalizes the public (including online) denial of the perjured “facts” established by the infamous Kangaroo-court called the Nuremberg Trial.
We note for Unz.Com readers that a bowderlized Nuremberg Trial transcript was published in Russian and English (not in German) and is available in most big-college libraries. Perusal of it will easily convince readers that the trial judges were biased and arbitrary in their conduct of the proceedings, which was staged purely to justify execution of German leadership and ideologists.
Meanwhile, no one condemned Gen. Eisenhower’s purposeful and quite deadly mistreatment of captured German POWs leading to the death about a million of them. No one condemned Stalin’s seizure of one-third of Germany (1946-47) and forcible expulsion of its civilian population on foot in mid-winter, leading to huge losses. The net result was that Poland (and Soviet Russia) moved westward, setting conditions for future war.
Overall, on the good side, I think Mr. Knudsen was/is well-intended when writing this essay and makes sound observations.
On the bad side, as unfortunately quite usual among the alternative media (AM) it seems these days (best/most often demonstrated by Judge Nap`s shows and guests), he makes just as many extremely unsound ones and his assembled “facts” (and thereby his following interpretations) are sadly riddled with purely factually grave falsehoods, which he could (and should) have easily corrected by double checking the numbers and graphs he presents, yet for some reason, he did not.
As examples:
No 1- “(a)Ukraine is an artificial state that has never existed before. (b)It is a state defined by a specific territory with random borders – without regard for the population living there. Such state formations have always caused problems.(c) Eastern and southern Ukraine are predominantly Russian-populated, while the north-west is predominantly Ukrainian. Over half of the population speaks Russian.”
– This is a very dishonest mis-representation of the actual historic facts:
(a)- Ironically the history of the country/state of Ukraine is actually far older than that of Russia. :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Ukraine
(b)- Unfortunately Ukraine`s sad fate since the 13th century has been a constant invasion by its neighbors:
13th century: by Mongols
14-16th century: Poland/Lithuania (+ Mongols in Crimea)
17-18th century: Poland/Russia
18-20th century: Russia
https://erian.substack.com/p/the-ukraine-war-good-versus-bad-guys
map
To blame this on Ukraine as having “random borders” is a truly interesting interpretation, I guess Ireland and Palestine are also highly guilty of that crime then?
Russia in/since 1686 had not only illegally annexed and then consciously colonized under Catherine the Great the areas that are now in dispute (Donbas region) with Russian settlers, but also violently suppressed the Ukrainian language and culture on the entire regions of Ukraine under its influence for centuries, though the population`s large majority was and remained ethnic Ukrainian in those areas:
(c)- This claim and the graphic map are very distorted, in fact before the current confrontation, of the 12 regions listed as exclusively “Russian” (pink) in Knudsen`s map, only 3 (Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk) had a Russian majority population, in 9 the Russians were the minority:
https://geosupportsystem.se/2014/05/03/ukrainian-population-map/
Demographical Map of Ukraine Population
byu/TheBerkay inMapPorn
No 2- “After that, the Russian and Russian-speaking population were rapidly deprived of their basic civil rights – what we otherwise understand as European values. Yes, this is actually part of international law, just as the protection of minorities – possibly by force of arms – is a duty!..”
– Interestingly, this deprivation of civic rights ironically was exactly what the Russian government had done to the Ukrainians in their own country for centuries, yet apparently this international law and rights to protection only go in one way for Mr Knudsen?
No 3- “A full-scale war was waged against the Russian population in Donbas – in eight years, 14,000 Ukrainian civilians were murdered until Russia said stop and intervened”
– Sadly this is a perfect example of the total lack of real investigatory efforts by Knudsen. Astonishingly, he never even bothered to read the official UN report that this alleged (and as it turns out – totally false) number is based upon:
a- Of the 14 000 killed actually ONLY 3400 WERE CIVILIANS AND THESE ARE CIVILIANS FROM BOTH SIDES! ( THE REST ARE DIVIDED BETWEEN KILLED ON THE UKRAINIAN AND RUSSIAN-SEPARATIST SIDE)
b- 90% OF THESE CASUALTIES OCCURRED DURING THE INITIAL WAR-FIGHTING OF 2014/15, ONLY 25 CIVILIANS PER YEAR (!), from both sides again, DIED PER AVERAGE FOR THE LAST 3 YEARS PRE 2022 RUSSIAN INVASION.
“Total conflict-related casualties in Ukraine in 2014-20217
OHCHR estimates the total number of conflict-related casualties in Ukraine from 14 April 2014 to 31 December
2021 to be 51,000–54,0008: 14,200-14,400 killed (at least 3,404 civilians, estimated 4,400 Ukrainian forces, and
estimated 6,500 members of armed groups”
Sorry to say, but such grave mistakes are inexcusable when publishing about such an important topic and only solidify the sad impression that Mr Knudsen only exchanges our days` mainstream childish black-white anti-Russia worldview with an equally child-like black white view only vice versa, missing the nuanced true target by just about equal length and making his essay as a whole thereby just as useless effecting a real solution to the deep-seated conflicted between the 2 opposing sides.
Knudsen understandibly as a Dane has never even remotely experienced -and thus can ridicule fears of- the historic “dark” side of Russian Politics and Self-image, though ironically quite a number of Danish volunteers during WW2 voluntarily (Viking Division) joined the German Forces in their fight against the looming Russian invasion of all of Europe.
But this also reveals him to be merely an armchair commentator, maybe he should have bothered to talk to at least some of the Millions of people all the way from Germany, Poland, Romania, Hungary, the Baltic states who have actually experienced daily for generations -and some of those for centuries- what he arrogantly and casually dismisses as “From the Soviet era, we know how much endless trouble one has with Europeans”.
While, as no one probably disputes, some claims of the threats of Russia invading Western Europe today are overblown and misused by our corrupt leaders, the true and most unfortunate and dangerous aspect of Russia and its leaders in my experience is that they for some reason seem utterly incapable of honest historical self-criticism, in fact have as their most defining national ideology/ “founding myth” created and established a child-cartoon-(in)version of their role in WW2 (celebrated each year as National Day) that one can only look at in astonishment over such hypocrisy and dishonesty.
And fittingly their most prominent leaders like Lavrov, Medvedev and Putin can hardly ever give one single interview without starting to babble about “Evil Nazis” everywhere and other countries threatening “Poor Victim Mother Russia” and never have even remotely admitted to their own country`s long history of abuse of others and dominant criminal role in WW2 and the post -war era, instead fascinatingly Putin has introduced a law making mentioning the latter criminal by law in Russia and has re-erected over 100 (!) memorials glorifying Stalin throughout his country in the recent years:
https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2025/05/21/stalin-is-making-a-comeback-in-russia-heres-why-a89155
And people with such a dishonest self-image unfortunately cannot be trusted, given that this usually shows in behavior sooner or later, as the invasion of Ukraine (fittingly under the slogan of “De-nazification”) sadly exemplifies.
And/but with all this said and to be fair, this is of course not to say that the US and some western countries are/were also to blame for the war in 2022 breaking out and not stopping and that the Russian Separatist in the Eastern Ukraine regions have legitimate concerns that should/must be listened to to find a sustainable solution, as well as NATO`s expansion too far.
As usual, both sides of the conflict have valid concerns, neither is blame- nor right-less.
And both must be presented fairly to get the whole picture, which, sorry to say, is why I found Mr Knudsen`s article highly problematic, though as mentioned, he seems undoubtedly well intended and does make valid points as well.
The Turkish exist as a state because the British Empire crushed the Ottoman Empire.
…Covid is what brought this home to me….
Yep.
On the positive side, there could be a ray of hope.
Our avatars here have almost diametrically opposite views on almost everything in this online pub….., and, yet, in THIS particular case, apparently, we have the same.
Maybe what’s coming will start to unite people in some sort of organized pushback. Maybe……
…It doesn’t matter. ….
Well….perhaps you could recall the times of hoax. How different regimes worked on their populations. How people behaved on local level. There WERE differences. So, it will matter. Not much, but it will.
The quality and quantity of stick and carrot. The former in particular.
My heart is revolted by the idea. But I am afraid that they are all in it together. All the elites on all the sides. All in it together. Like in 1984. Covid is what brought this home to me. A hoax that every elite in the world supported with armed force. Pick a side. It doesn’t matter.
This question alludes to the overlooked central economic fact of the remarkably peaceful dissolution of the USSR and the Warsaw Pact:
Can anyone give a single reasonable reason why Russia would want to occupy Western Europe?
The Banderites or whoever’s in charge in Kiev are the handmaidens of the neocons, that is, of the Jews. We can distinguish Jewish from American interests inasmuch as back in 2014 the Israeli press ran articles about the Ashkenazi reconquest and repopulation of the Ukraine as their ancestral homeland. When they were called on this by Rick Wiles of Trunews after Russia’s SMO began, the Israelis claimed those articles, whose goal was publicly confirmed by Zelensky himself, were meant as satire. Zelensky, to my knowledge, has never retracted or been called upon to retract his statement that the purpose of the war with Russia was the creation of Big Israel.
Recall that the Israeli press called the Jews running Biden a “minyan,” facetiously suggesting there were sufficient numbers of Jews to conduct the affairs of the United States for the benefit of the Jews. E. Michael Jones, referring to the 457 or so Jews actually running that administration, quipped that the Biden administration was a stalking horse for the Jews. These are the people whose policies Trump is advancing after promising to end the war on his first day in office, and after implying to the Knesset that, like Jewish gangster Miriam Adelson, his first loyalty is to Israel—as if anyone needs him to publicly tell us this.
A since-disappeared article in Foreign Affairs years ago by Jewish authors gloated over Israel’s having been negotiating with China behind the US’ back for years without the US having a clue. As I recall, it vaguely hinted that Israel was using its espionage against the US as bargaining chips with the Chinese for what Chinese espionage had been unsuccessful stealing on its own. The article ended with Palmerston’s quip that nations have no permanent allies, only permanent interests, and that soon enough Israel would be throwing the US under the bus when it was finished using it to create Greater Israel.
I’d guess there’s a lot of anticipation over Trump Gaza as the site of seaside villas for rich Jews fleeing the US and Europe now that Russia has re-absorbed Crimea and will soon retake Odessa. No wonder the neocons and their flunkies running Europe feel the need to defeat Russia since there isn’t nearly enough waterfront property in Trump Gaza.
“60 years later the Turks slaughtered the forces of the British Empire at Gallipoli.”
Hardly a slaughter if you lose 56 thousand dead soldiers to the British Empire’s 56 thousand.
Interesting story. I partly agree with the author, but Russia’s next invasion will be Finland, not Moldova. Russia has always seen Finland as its backyard and will commit a fatal mistake if it invades Finland because the Finns are not like the Poles or Ukrainians. Finns will fight and possibly decapitate Russia as we know it. Putin and his Jewish oligarchs know this very fact.
Can anyone give a single reasonable reason why Russia would want to occupy Western Europe?
This question alludes to the overlooked central economic fact of the remarkably peaceful dissolution of the USSR and the Warsaw Pact:
Russia represented the core economic strength of both (in a manner analogous to the role of Germany in the EU), and belatedly recognized that they were much better off attending to their own internal problems instead of subsidizing other countries.
Why in the world would any rational person in Russia support the massive financial drain it would be on the finances of their country to prop up a de-industrializing insane asylum like the EU, a polity that is regularly on the brink of outbreaks of inter-ethnic violence if not outright civil war? The EU “elites” want a military buildup now not because of Russia, but because they intend to use whatever violence they require to retain power over their own enraged citizenry.
The October 1917 Bolshevik Revolution was a catastrophic foreign-funded regime-change operation. Central to the Bolshevik Revolution and the foreign financial and political support that made it possible was an utterly irrational hatred toward Russia.
Protestant Britain and Catholic France allied with the Muslim Ottomans in the Crimean War and 60 years later the Turks slaughtered the forces of the British Empire at Gallipoli. Notice how every English-language account of Rasputin portrays him as the devil incarnate? Rasputin–whatever else he may have been–was a prophet about the catastrophic consequences of Russian involvement in WWI, and the British likely had him murdered because of his prescient opposition to Russian involvement in that senseless bloodbath. No Russian involvement in WWI would have saved countless BRITISH and EUROPEAN lives in WWI as well as saving countless Russian lives, and would have likely prevented the Bolshevik Revolution, the rise of Hitler, and WWII. Things all came a cropper for British scheming anyway, as the Bolshevik Revolution led to the Brest-Litovsk Treaty and even more BRITISH and EUROPEAN lives lost on the Western Front.
Not to be outdone, Protestant Germany arranged transit of the sealed train carrying Lenin through Sweden and Finland to St. Petersburg, and 40 years later the Red Army hoisted their banner over the ruins of the Reichstag. The butcher’s bill for Germany as a result of WWII: millions of the flower of Germany’s youth dead; German sovereignty lost forever; and now the very survival of the Germans as a people is in doubt. Again, all resulting from an utterly irrational hatred toward Russia.
Finally, the Banderite dictatorship that temporarily rules in Kiev seethes with hatred toward Russia. Yet, mirabile dictu, they adamantly cling to the fiction that their so-called “Ukraine” should inherit artificial, ahistorical borders that were conferred on it by–you guessed it–the very Bolsheviks that wrecked such misery on the Russian people and the entire world. But let’s not kid ourselves. The Banderites are mere button men for the ghoulish grave-digging gangsters who are delighted by the killing of Slavs in general, and Russians in particular. President Putin supported the rehabilitation of White Russian military and intellectual leaders like Anton Denikin, Vladimir Kappel, and Ivan Ilyin–historical revisionism that some quarters are never going to forgive. The rest, as they say, is history.
If I were not old as I am, I would immediately move to Russia.
Oh yeah, who wouldn’t want to move to Russia where denying the ‘Hoaxlocaust’ gets you 5 years in some prison, where an annual international ‘Anti-Fascist Conference’ is held & where some Jew named Boris Spiegel is the chairman of a government agency called ‘World Without Nazism’. Get me my plane ticket.
The Jew’s plan seems to be working in the Nordic countries. I visited Stockholm Sweden last year and saw tons of white women pushing baby carriages with black babies them, fathered by men from Africa. Denmark and Norway appear determined to do the same.
The future Swedish people will look like this at this rate:
True, but blame the people letting them in.
OR fuckers can just admit that the only reason they move to white nations because they hate their own people.
It is irrelevant what their reason is. The issue is government policy allowing them in. Why is there any immigration while there is unemployment?
To split hairs, I suggest that it is entirely possible to be against all non-white immigration and not deport a black Muslim or black Christian. You cannot blame the immigrant for applying to come to the country, but you can blame the government responsible for the policy that allows them into the country. Deportation was/is designed to rid the country of those who are not following the laws of the country. Citizenship oaths have requirements. If those oaths are broken, then any immigrant breaking the oath should be deported, irrespective of religion or race. If they haven't broken the citizenship oath and are "good citizens" they shouldn't be deported, as they have done nothing wrong.Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @NoBodyImportant, @Wokechoke
You’re either against all non-white immigration, or your not, religion should not be anything to consider. Deport a black Christian just as you’d deport a black Muslim.
Blacks are a battering ram.
The problem is that in some sense, native Europeans don’t really exist anymore, or at least are irrelevant. Jews have been living in Europe in dominant and influential positions for over a thousand years. People automatically associate German-sounding last names with Jewishness. European history is Jewish history. I mean if that is not replacement and erasure, what is? The European elite IS Jewish. Replacement isn’t something that is happening, it has already happened.
To split hairs, I suggest that it is entirely possible to be against all non-white immigration and not deport a black Muslim or black Christian. You cannot blame the immigrant for applying to come to the country, but you can blame the government responsible for the policy that allows them into the country. Deportation was/is designed to rid the country of those who are not following the laws of the country. Citizenship oaths have requirements. If those oaths are broken, then any immigrant breaking the oath should be deported, irrespective of religion or race. If they haven't broken the citizenship oath and are "good citizens" they shouldn't be deported, as they have done nothing wrong.Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @NoBodyImportant, @Wokechoke
You’re either against all non-white immigration, or your not, religion should not be anything to consider. Deport a black Christian just as you’d deport a black Muslim.
OR fuckers can just admit that the only reason they move to white nations because they hate their own people. I want nothing to do with white countries anymore, They are too cucked and weak for me to be around. If I want to live around blacks or Muslims I’d just go to one of their countries. Not a white country where the fuckers are invading to make it look like the places they all came from.
It is irrelevant what their reason is. The issue is government policy allowing them in. Why is there any immigration while there is unemployment?
OR fuckers can just admit that the only reason they move to white nations because they hate their own people.
To split hairs, I suggest that it is entirely possible to be against all non-white immigration and not deport a black Muslim or black Christian. You cannot blame the immigrant for applying to come to the country, but you can blame the government responsible for the policy that allows them into the country. Deportation was/is designed to rid the country of those who are not following the laws of the country. Citizenship oaths have requirements. If those oaths are broken, then any immigrant breaking the oath should be deported, irrespective of religion or race. If they haven't broken the citizenship oath and are "good citizens" they shouldn't be deported, as they have done nothing wrong.Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @NoBodyImportant, @Wokechoke
You’re either against all non-white immigration, or your not, religion should not be anything to consider. Deport a black Christian just as you’d deport a black Muslim.
You’re an idiot.
Next.
You’re either against all non-white immigration, or your not, religion should not be anything to consider. Deport a black Christian just as you’d deport a black Muslim.
To split hairs, I suggest that it is entirely possible to be against all non-white immigration and not deport a black Muslim or black Christian. You cannot blame the immigrant for applying to come to the country, but you can blame the government responsible for the policy that allows them into the country. Deportation was/is designed to rid the country of those who are not following the laws of the country. Citizenship oaths have requirements. If those oaths are broken, then any immigrant breaking the oath should be deported, irrespective of religion or race. If they haven’t broken the citizenship oath and are “good citizens” they shouldn’t be deported, as they have done nothing wrong.
Wilders is a Jewish name and Geert Wilders is a Jew or half-Jew masquerading as a Gentile. He’s anti-Muslim and pro-Jewish because he’s controlled opposition. Dutch Jews don’t vote for him because they want to distance themselves from him so as to hide his Jewish background. If almost none of them, vote for him, it will seal his fate to the Dutch public that he is a big bad Gentile whom only the far-right racists would vote for. In reality, he’s pulling the anti-immigration vote in a harmless direction and dissipating it, ending up not achieving anything constructive. You’re either against all non-white immigration, or your not, religion should not be anything to consider. Deport a black Christian just as you’d deport a black Muslim.
To split hairs, I suggest that it is entirely possible to be against all non-white immigration and not deport a black Muslim or black Christian. You cannot blame the immigrant for applying to come to the country, but you can blame the government responsible for the policy that allows them into the country. Deportation was/is designed to rid the country of those who are not following the laws of the country. Citizenship oaths have requirements. If those oaths are broken, then any immigrant breaking the oath should be deported, irrespective of religion or race. If they haven't broken the citizenship oath and are "good citizens" they shouldn't be deported, as they have done nothing wrong.Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @NoBodyImportant, @Wokechoke
You’re either against all non-white immigration, or your not, religion should not be anything to consider. Deport a black Christian just as you’d deport a black Muslim.
I see Alma Barebum…or is it Alma Ad-hoc…Hamhock…Hemlock…I don’t know?
Anyhow Alma Barebum has being threatening China now…I was always told let people think your an idiot…that keeps them guessing…don’t open your mouth and confirm their suspicions. Alma Barebum never learnt that.
https://archive.is/DiyEC#The%20Problem%20with%20Profound%20Inabilities
How many times I have heard the blithely unreflective remark of: Those people aren’t a problem, I really like them. That’s gratifying to them, I’m sure. But they don’t like you. And that’s the issue more relevant to your family’s welfare. Many simply do not conceive of the diverse spheres of consciousness beyond their own cloistered universalism. They presume, despite howling evidence to the contrary, a reciprocity of affection, morality, and values between themselves and those competing tribes who most certainly don’t consider them BFFs.
Why no public outrage that the Spectre bitch can say she’s going to kill Europe?
And anyone who disagrees is antisemite? Do I got that right?
Topsy-turvy world we got.
Immigration is, and always has been, an economic issue in the sense that it is used by “capital” to create excess labour, which suppresses wages and working conditions. At the same time, the immigrants, being “new markets”, “compete” for shelter, food, and other commodities, creating “demand” which increases the cost of both. Often ignored is the net cost to government and the outflow of capital through remittances, which removes money from the economy.
The “multiculturalism” model has always been used to create dissent internally in order to divert attention away from how (((those))) really in control, are dumbing down and beggaring the population. The few “success stories” allowed every year and the cult status of “personalities” are other diversions.
Wilders and his ilk (the AmRen people here) will never learn that saying nice things about Jews will avail you nothing if you oppose any part of the Jewish anti-gentile program. If you do, you are the new Hitler.