[go: up one dir, main page]

The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Alastair Crooke Ambrose Kane Anatoly Karlin Andrew Anglin Andrew Joyce Audacious Epigone C.J. Hopkins E. Michael Jones Eric Margolis Eric Striker Fred Reed Gilad Atzmon Gregory Hood Guillaume Durocher Hua Bin Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir ISteve Community James Kirkpatrick James Thompson Jared Taylor John Derbyshire Jonathan Cook Jung-Freud Karlin Community Kevin Barrett Kevin MacDonald Larry Romanoff Laurent Guyénot Linh Dinh Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Patrick Lawrence Paul Craig Roberts Paul Kersey Pepe Escobar Peter Frost Philip Giraldi Razib Khan Ron Unz Steve Sailer The Saker Tobias Langdon A. Graham A. J. Smuskiewicz A Southerner Academic Research Group UK Staff Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Agha Hussain Ahmad Al Khaled Ahmet Öncü Al X Griz Alain De Benoist Alan Macleod Albemarle Man Alex Graham Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alexander Jacob Alexander Wolfheze Alfred De Zayas Alfred McCoy Alison Weir Allan Wall Allegra Harpootlian Amalric De Droevig Amr Abozeid Amy Goodman Anand Gopal Anastasia Katz Andre Damon Andre Vltchek Andreas Canetti Andrei Martyanov Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andrew Hamilton Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Napolitano Andrew S. Fischer Andy Kroll Angie Saxon Ann Jones Anna Tolstoyevskaya Anne Wilson Smith Anonymous Anonymous American Anonymous Attorney Anonymous Occidental Anthony Boehm Anthony Bryan Anthony DiMaggio Tony Hall Antiwar Staff Antonius Aquinas Antony C. Black Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor AudaciousEpigone Augustin Goland Austen Layard Ava Muhammad Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Bailey Schwab Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Kissin Barry Lando Barton Cockey Beau Albrecht Belle Chesler Ben Fountain Ben Freeman Ben Sullivan Benjamin Villaroel Bernard M. Smith Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Blake Archer Williams Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Book Boyd D. Cathey Brad Griffin Bradley Moore Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brett Wilkins Brian Dew Brian McGlinchey Brian R. Wright Britannicus Brittany Smith Brooke C.D. Corax C.J. Miller Caitlin Johnstone Cara Marianna Carl Boggs Carl Horowitz Carolyn Yeager Cat McGuire Catherine Crump César Keller César Tort Chalmers Johnson Chanda Chisala Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlie O'Neill Charlottesville Survivor Chase Madar ChatGPT Chauke Stephan Filho Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Chris Woltermann Christian Appy Christophe Dolbeau Christopher DeGroot Christopher Donovan Christopher Harvin Christopher Ketcham Chuck Spinney Civus Non Nequissimus CODOH Editors Coleen Rowley Colin Liddell Cooper Sterling Courtney Alabama Craig Murray Cynthia Chung D.F. Mulder Dahr Jamail Dakota Witness Dan E. Phillips Dan Roodt Dan Sanchez Daniel Barge Daniel McAdams Daniel Moscardi Daniel Vinyard Danny Sjursen Dave Chambers Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Boyajian David Bromwich David Chibo David Chu David Gordon David Haggith David Irving David L. McNaron David Lorimer David M. Zsutty David Martin David North David Skrbina David Stockman David Vine David Walsh David William Pear David Yorkshire Dean Baker Declan Hayes Dennis Dale Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Diego Ramos Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Dmitriy Kalyagin Don Wassall Donald Thoresen Alan Sabrosky Dr. Ejaz Akram Dr. Ridgely Abdul Mu’min Muhammad Dries Van Langenhove E. Frederick Stevens E. Geist Eamonn Fingleton Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Edward Curtin Edward Dutton Egbert Dijkstra Egor Kholmogorov Ehud Shapiro Ekaterina Blinova Elias Akleh Ellen Brown Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Emil Kirkegaard Emilio García Gómez Emma Goldman Enzo Porter Eric Draitser Eric Paulson Eric Peters Eric Rasmusen Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Gant Eugene Girin Eugene Kusmiak Eve Mykytyn F. Douglas Stephenson F. Roger Devlin Fadi Abu Shammalah Fantine Gardinier Federale Fenster Fergus Hodgson Finian Cunningham The First Millennium Revisionist Fordham T. Smith Former Agent Forum Francis Goumain Frank Key Frank Tipler Franklin Lamb Franklin Stahl Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner G.M. Davis Gabriel Black Ganainm Gary Corseri Gary Heavin Gary North Gary Younge Gavin Newsom Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Galloway George Koo George Mackenzie George Szamuely Georgia Hayduke Georgianne Nienaber Gerhard Grasruck Gilbert Cavanaugh Gilbert Doctorow Giles Corey Glen K. Allen Glenn Greenwald A. Beaujean Agnostic Alex B. Amnestic Arcane Asher Bb Bbartlog Ben G Birch Barlow Canton ChairmanK Chrisg Coffee Mug Darth Quixote David David B David Boxenhorn DavidB Diana Dkane DMI Dobeln Duende Dylan Ericlien Fly Gcochran Godless Grady Herrick Jake & Kara Jason Collins Jason Malloy Jason s Jeet Jemima Joel John Emerson John Quiggin JP Kele Kjmtchl Mark Martin Matoko Kusanagi Matt Matt McIntosh Michael Vassar Miko Ml Ole P-ter Piccolino Rosko Schizmatic Scorpius Suman TangoMan The Theresa Thorfinn Thrasymachus Wintz Godfree Roberts Gonzalo Lira Graham Seibert Grant M. Dahl Greg Garros Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Greg Klein Gregg Stanley Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Conte Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Gunnar Alfredsson Gustavo Arellano H.G. Reza Hank Johnson Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Hans Vogel Harri Honkanen Heiner Rindermann Helen Buyniski Henry Cockburn Hewitt E. Moore Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Howe Abbot-Hiss Hubert Collins Hugh Kennedy Hugh McInnish Hugh Moriarty Hugh Perry Hugo Dionísio Hunter DeRensis Hunter Wallace Huntley Haverstock Ian Fantom Ian Proud Ichabod Thornton Igor Shafarevich Ira Chernus Irmin Vinson Ivan Kesić J. Alfred Powell J.B. Clark J.D. Gore J. Ricardo Martins Jacek Szela Jack Antonio Jack Dalton Jack Kerwick Jack Krak Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen Jake Bowyer James Bovard James Carroll James Carson Harrington James Chang James Dunphy James Durso James Edwards James Fulford James Gillespie James Hanna James J. O'Meara James K. Galbraith James Karlsson James Lawrence James Petras James W. Smith Jane Lazarre Jane Weir Janice Kortkamp Janko Vukic Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Cannon Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jayant Bhandari JayMan Jean Bricmont Jean Marois Jean Ranc Jef Costello Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey D. Sachs Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jeremy Kuzmarov Jesse Mossman JHR Writers Jim Daniel Jim Fetzer Jim Goad Jim Kavanagh Jim Mamer Jim Smith JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Atwill Joe Dackman Joe Lauria Joel Davis Joel S. Hirschhorn Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Gorman John Harrison Sims John Helmer John Hill John Huss John J. Mearsheimer John Jackson John Kiriakou John Macdonald John Morgan John Patterson John Leonard John Pilger John Q. Publius John Rand John Reid John Ryan John Scales Avery John Siman John Stauber John T. Kelly John Taylor John Titus John Tremain John V. Walsh John Wear John Williams Jon Else Jon Entine Jonas E. Alexis Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Revusky Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Sawyer Jonathan Schell Jordan Henderson Jordan Steiner Jorge Besada Jose Alberto Nino Joseph Correro Joseph Kay Joseph Kishore Joseph Sobran Josephus Tiberius Josh Neal Joshua Scheer Jeshurun Tsarfat Juan Cole Judith Coburn Julian Bradford Julian Macfarlane K.J. Noh Kacey Gunther Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Karl Haemers Karl Nemmersdorf Karl Thorburn Kees Van Der Pijl Keith Woods Kelley Vlahos Kenn Gividen Kenneth A. Carlson Kenneth Vinther Kerry Bolton Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin DeAnna Kevin Folta Kevin Michael Grace Kevin Rothrock Kevin Sullivan Kevin Zeese Kit Klarenberg Kshama Sawant Lance Welton Larry C. Johnson Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Lawrence Erickson Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Leonard C. Goodman Leonard R. Jaffee Liam Cosgrove Lidia Misnik Lilith Powell Linda Preston Lipton Matthews Liv Heide Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett Louis Farrakhan Lydia Brimelow M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maciej Pieczyński Mahmoud Khalil Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marc Sills Marco De Wit Marcus Alethia Marcus Apostate Marcus Cicero Marcus Devonshire Marcus Schultze Marcy Winograd Margaret Flowers Margot Metroland Marian Evans Mark Allen Mark Bratchikov-Pogrebisskiy Mark Crispin Miller Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Gullick Mark H. Gaffney Mark Lu Mark O'Brien Mark Perry Mark Weber Marshall Yeats Martin Jay Martin K. O'Toole Martin Lichtmesz Martin Webster Martin Witkerk Mary Phagan-Kean Matt Cockerill Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Battaglioli Matthew Caldwell Matthew Ehret Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max Jones Max North Max Parry Max West Maya Schenwar Merlin Miller Metallicman Michael A. Roberts Michael Averko Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Hoffman Michael Masterson Michael Quinn Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Michael Walker Michelle Ellner Michelle Malkin Miko Peled Mnar Muhawesh Moon Landing Skeptic Morgan Jones Morris V. De Camp Mr. Anti-Humbug Muhammed Abu Murray Polner N. Joseph Potts Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Nathan Cofnas Nathan Doyle Ned Stark Neil Kumar Nelson Rosit Neville Hodgkinson Niall McCrae Nicholas R. Jeelvy Nicholas Stix Nick Griffin Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Nicolás Palacios Navarro Nils Van Der Vegte Noam Chomsky NOI Research Group Nomi Prins Norman Finkelstein Norman Solomon OldMicrobiologist Oliver Boyd-Barrett Oliver Williams Oscar Grau P.J. Collins Pádraic O'Bannon Patrice Greanville Patrick Armstrong Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Patrick Martin Patrick McDermott Patrick Whittle Paul Bennett Paul Cochrane Paul De Rooij Paul Edwards Paul Engler Paul Gottfried Paul Larudee Paul Mitchell Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Paul Souvestre Paul Tripp Pedro De Alvarado Peter Baggins Ph.D. Peter Bradley Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Haenseler Peter Lee Peter Van Buren Philip Kraske Philip Weiss Pierre M. Sprey Pierre Simon Povl H. Riis-Knudsen Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Qasem Soleimani R, Weiler Rachel Marsden Raches Radhika Desai Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ralph Raico Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Ramzy Baroud Randy Shields Raul Diego Ray McGovern Raymond Wolters Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Reginald De Chantillon Rémi Tremblay Rev. Matthew Littlefield Ricardo Duchesne Richard Cook Richard Falk Richard Faussette Richard Foley Richard Galustian Richard Houck Richard Hugus Richard Knight Richard Krushnic Richard McCulloch Richard Parker Richard Silverstein Richard Solomon Rick Shenkman Rick Sterling Rita Rozhkova Rob Crease Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Debrus Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Fisk Robert Hampton Robert Henderson Robert Inlakesh Robert LaFlamme Robert Lindsay Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Stark Robert Stevens Robert Trivers Robert Wallace Robert Weissberg Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Rolo Slavskiy Romana Rubeo Romanized Visigoth Ron Paul Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Rose Pinochet RT Staff Ruuben Kaalep Ryan Andrews Ryan Dawson Sabri Öncü Salim Mansur Sam Dickson Sam Francis Sam Husseini Samuel Sequeira Sayed Hasan Scot Olmstead Scott Howard Scott Locklin Scott Ritter Seaghan Breathnach Servando Gonzalez Sharmine Narwani Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Sidney James Sietze Bosman Sigurd Kristensen Sinclair Jenkins Southfront Editor Spencer Davenport Spencer J. Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen F. Cohen Stephen J. Rossi Stephen J. Sniegoski Stephen Paul Foster Sterling Anderson Steve Fraser Steve Keen Steve Penfield Steven Farron Steven Starr Steven Yates Subhankar Banerjee Susan Southard Sybil Fares Sydney Schanberg Talia Mullin Tanya Golash-Boza Taxi Taylor McClain Taylor Young Ted O'Keefe Ted Rall The Crew The Zman Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas A. Fudge Thomas Anderson Thomas Hales Thomas Dalton Thomas Ertl Thomas Frank Thomas Hales Thomas Jackson Thomas O. Meehan Thomas Steuben Thomas Zaja Thorsten J. Pattberg Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Timothy Vorgenss Timur Fomenko Tingba Muhammad Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Engelhardt Tom Mysiewicz Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Torin Murphy Tracy Rosenberg Travis LeBlanc Trevor Lynch Vernon Thorpe Virginia Dare Vito Klein Vladimir Brovkin Vladimir Putin Vladislav Krasnov Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walt King Walter E. Block Warren Balogh Washington Watcher Washington Watcher II Wayne Allensworth Wei Ling Chua Wesley Muhammad White Man Faculty Whitney Webb Wilhelm Kriessmann Wilhem Ivorsson Will Jones Will Offensicht William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Wyatt Peterson Wyatt Reed Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen Yaroslav Podvolotskiy Yvonne Lorenzo Zhores Medvedev
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2020 Election Academia American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Black Crime Black Lives Matter Blacks Britain Censorship China China/America Conspiracy Theories Covid Culture/Society Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Gaza Genocide Hamas History Holocaust Ideology Immigration IQ Iran Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Joe Biden NATO Nazi Germany Neocons Open Thread Political Correctness Race/Ethnicity Russia Science Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 汪精衛 100% Jussie-free Content 1984 2008 Election 2012 Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2022 Election 2024 Election 23andMe 9/11 Abortion Abraham Lincoln Academy Awards Achievement Gap ACLU Acting White Adam Schiff Addiction ADL Admin Administration Admixture Adolf Hitler Advertising AfD Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Age Age Of Malthusian Industrialism Agriculture AI AIPAC Air Force Aircraft Carriers Airlines Airports Al Jazeera Al Qaeda Alain Soral Alan Clemmons Alan Dershowitz Albania Albert Einstein Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Alejandro Mayorkas Alex Jones Alexander Dugin Alexander Vindman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Alexei Navalny Algeria Ali Dawabsheh Alison Nathan Alt Right Altruism Amazon Amazon.com America America First American Civil War American Dream American History American Indians American Israel Public Affairs Committee American Jews American Left American Nations American Presidents American Prisons American Renaissance Amerindians Amish Amnesty Amnesty International Amos Hochstein Amy Klobuchar Anarchism Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Greece Ancient Rome Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Bacevich Andrew Yang Anglo-America Anglo-imperialism Anglo-Saxons Anglos Anglosphere Angola Animal IQ Animals Ann Coulter Anne Frank Anthony Blinken Anthony Fauci Anthrax Anthropology Anti-Defamation League Anti-Gentilism Anti-Vaccination Anti-Vaxx Anti-white Animus Antifa Antifeminism Antiquity Antiracism Antisemitism Antisemitism Awareness Act Antisocial Behavior Antizionism Antony Blinken Apartheid Apartheid Israel Apollo's Ascent Appalachia Apple Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaeogenetics Archaeology Architecture Arctic Arctic Sea Ice Melting Argentina Ariel Sharon Armageddon War Armenia Armenian Genocide Army Arnold Schwarzenegger Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Lichte Artificial Intelligence Arts/Letters Aryan Invasion Theory Aryans Aryeh Lightstone Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians Assassination Assassinations Assimilation Atheism Atlanta AUMF Auschwitz Austin Metcalf Australia Australian Aboriginals Automation Avril Haines Ayn Rand Azerbaijan Azov Brigade Babes And Hunks Baby Gap Balfour Declaration Balkans Balochistan Baltics Baltimore Riots Banjamin Netanyahu Banking Industry Banking System Banks #BanTheADL Barack Obama Baseball Statistics Bashar Al-Assad Basketball BBC BDS BDS Movement Beauty Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Belarus Belgium Belgrade Embassy Bombing Ben Cardin Ben Rhodes Ben Shapiro Ben Stiller Benny Gantz Bernard Henri-Levy Bernie Sanders Betar US Betsy DeVos Betty McCollum Bezalel Smotrich Bezalel Yoel Smotrich Biden BigPost Bilateral Relations Bilingual Education Bill Clinton Bill De Blasio Bill Gates Bill Kristol Bill Maher Bill Of Rights Billionaires Billy Graham Bioethics Biology Bioweapons Birmingham Birth Rate Bitcoin Black Community Black History Month Black Muslims Black People Black Slavery BlackLivesMatter Blackmail Blake Masters Blank Slatism BLM Blog Blogging Blogosphere Blond Hair Blood Libel Blue Eyes Boasian Anthropology Boeing Boers Bolshevik Revolution Bolshevik Russia Bolshevism Books Boomers Border Wall Boris Johnson Bosnia Boycott Divest And Sanction Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Bret Stephens Bretton Woods Brexit Brezhnev Bri Brian Mast BRICs British Empire British Labour Party British Politics Buddhism Build The Wall Bulldog Bush Business BYD Byzantine Caitlin Johnstone California Californication Camp Of The Saints Canada Canary Mission Cancer Candace Owens Capitalism Carlos Slim Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Cars Carthaginians Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Cats Caucasus CBS News CCP CDC Ceasefire Census Central Asia Central Intelligence Agency Chabad Chanda Chisala Chaos And Order Charles De Gaulle Charles Kushner Charles Lindbergh Charles Manson Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charlie Hebdo Charlie Kirk Charlottesville ChatGPT Checheniest Chechen Of Them All Chechens Chechnya Chetty Chicago Chicagoization Chicken Hut Child Abuse Children Chile China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese IQ Chinese Language Christian Zionism Christian Zionists Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Christopher Wray Chuck Schumer CIA Cinema Citizenship Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil Rights Movement Civil War Civilization Clannishness Clash Of Civilizations Class Classical Antiquity Classical History Classical Music Clayton County Climate Change Clint Eastwood Clintons Coal Coalition Of The Fringes Coen Brothers Cognitive Elitism Cognitive Science Cold Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard College Admission College Football Colombia Colonialism Color Revolution Columbia University Columbus Comic Books Communism Computers Confederacy Confederate Flag Confucianism Congress Conquistador-American Conservatism Conservative Movement Conservatives Conspiracy Theory Constantinople Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumerism Controversial Book Convergence Core Article Corona Corporatism Corruption COTW Counterpunch Country Music Cousin Marriage Cover Story COVID-19 Craig Murray Creationism Crime Crimea Crimean War Crispr Critical Race Theory Cruise Missiles Crusades Crying Among The Farmland Crypto Cryptocurrency Ctrl-Left Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckery Cuckservative CUFI Cuisine Cultural Marxism Cultural Revolution Culture Culture War Czech Republic DACA Daily Data Dump Dallas Shooting Damnatio Memoriae Dan Bilzarian Danny Danon Daren Acemoglu Darwinism Darya Dugina Data Data Analysis Dave Chappelle David Bazelon David Brog David Cole David Duke David Friedman David Frum David Irving David Lynch David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Of The West Deborah Lipstadt Debt Debt Jubilee Decadence Deep State DeepSeek Deficits Degeneracy Democracy Democratic Party Demograhics Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denmark Dennis Ross Department Of Education Department Of Homeland Security Deplatforming Deportation Abyss Deportations Derek Chauvin Detroit Development Dick Cheney Diet Digital Yuan Dinesh D'Souza Discrimination Disease Disinformation Disney Disparate Impact Disraeli Dissent Dissidence Diversity Diversity Before Diversity Diversity Pokemon Points Dmitry Medvedev DNA Dogs Dollar Domestic Surveillance Domestic Terrorism Doomsday Clock Dostoevsky Doug Emhoff Doug Feith Dresden Drone War Drones Drug Cartels Drug Laws Drugs Duterte Dysgenic Dystopia E. Michael Jones E. O. Wilson East Asia East Asian Exception East Asians East Turkestan Easter Eastern Europe Ebrahim Raisi Economic Development Economic History Economic Sanctions Economy Edmund Burke Foundation Education Edward Snowden Effective Altruism Effortpost Efraim Zurofff Egor Kholmogorov Egypt El Salvador Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2020 Election Fraud Elections Electric Cars Eli Rosenbaum Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elise Stefanik Elites Elizabeth Holmes Elizabeth Warren Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emmanuel Macron Emmett Till Employment Energy England Enoch Powell Entertainment Environment Environmentalism Epidemiology Equality Erdogan Eretz Israel Eric Zemmour Ernest Hemingway Espionage Espionage Act Estonia Ethics Ethics And Morals Ethiopia Ethnic Cleansing Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity Ethnocentricty EU Eugene Debs Eugenics Eurabia Eurasia Euro Europe European Genetics European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Genetics Evolutionary Psychology Existential Risks Eye Color Face Shape Facebook Faces Fake News False Flag Attack Family Fantasy FARA Farmers Fascism Fast Food FBI FDA FDD Federal Reserve FEMA Feminism Ferguson Ferguson Shooting Fermi Paradox Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates FIFA Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Finland Finn Baiting First Amendment First World War FISA Fitness Flash Mobs Flight From White Floyd Riots 2020 Fluctuarius Argenteus Flynn Effect Food Football For Fun Forecasts Foreign Agents Registration Act Foreign Aid Foreign Policy Fox News France Francesca Albanese Frank Salter Frankfurt School Franklin D. Roosevelt Franz Boas Fraud Fred Kagan Free Market Free Speech Free Trade Freedom Of Speech Freedom Freemasons French French Revolution Friedrich Karl Berger Friends Of The Israel Defense Forces Frivolty Frontlash Furkan Dogan Future Futurism G20 Gambling Game Game Of Thrones Gavin McInnes Gavin Newsom Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza Flotilla GDP Gen Z Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Equality Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Genealogy General Intelligence General Motors Generation Z Generational Gap Genes Genetic Diversity Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genomics Gentrification Geography Geopolitics George Bush George Floyd George Galloway George Patton George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush Georgia Germans Germany Ghislaine Maxwell Gilad Atzmon Gina Peddy Giorgia Meloni Gladwell Glenn Greenwald Global Warming Globalism Globalization Globo-Homo God Gold Golf Gonzalo Lira Google Government Government Debt Government Spending Government Surveillance Government Waste Grant Smith Graphs Great Bifurcation Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Powers Great Replacement Greece Greeks Greenland Greg Cochran Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Greta Thunberg Grooming Group Selection GSS Guardian Guest Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns GWAS Gypsies H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Haiti Hajnal Line Halloween HammerHate Hannibal Procedure Happening Happiness Harvard Harvard University Harvey Weinstein Hassan Nasrallah Hate Crimes Fraud Hoax Hate Hoaxes Hate Speech Hbd Hbd Chick Health Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Hegira Height Hell Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Heredity Heritability Heritage Foundation Hezbollah High Speed Rail Hillary Clinton Hindu Caste System Hindus Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanics Historical Genetics History Of Science Hitler HIV/AIDS Hoax Holland Hollywood Holocaust Denial Holocaust Deniers Homelessness Homicide Homicide Rate Hominin Homomania Homosexuality Hong Kong Houellebecq Housing Houthis Howard Kohr Huawei Huddled Masses Huey Newton Hugo Chavez Human Achievement Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Evolutionary Genetics Human Evolutionary Genomics Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Rights Human Rights Watch Humor Hungary Hunt For The Great White Defendant Hunter Biden Hypersonic I.F. Stone I.Q. I.Q. Genomics #IBelieveInHavenMonahan ICC Icj Ideas Identity Ideology And Worldview IDF Idiocracy Igbo Ilan Pappe Ilhan Omar Illegal Immigration Ilyushin IMF Impeachment Imperialism Inbreeding Income Income Tax India Indian Indian IQ Indians Individualism Indo-Europeans Indonesia Inequality Inflation Intelligence Intelligence Agencies International International Comparisons International Court Of Justice International Criminal Court International Relations Internet Interracial Marriage Interracism Intersectionality Intifada Intra-Racism Intraracism Invade Invite In Hock Invade The World Invite The World Iosef Stalin Iosif Stalin Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish Is Love Colorblind Isaac Herzog ISIS Islam Islamic Jihad Islamic State Islamism Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Bonds Israel Defense Force Israel Defense Forces Israel Separation Wall Israeli Occupation IT Italy Itamar Ben-Gvir It's Okay To Be White Ivanka Ivy League J Street Jack Welch Jacky Rosen Jair Bolsonaro Jake Sullivan Jake Tapper Jamal Khashoggi James Angleton James B. Watson James Clapper James Comey James Forrestal James Jeffrey James Mattis James Watson James Zogby Janet Yellen Janice Yellen Japan Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Greenblatt JASTA Javier Milei JCPOA JD Vance Jeb Bush Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Goldberg Jeffrey Sachs Jen Psaki Jennifer Rubin Jens Stoltenberg Jeremy Corbyn Jerry Seinfeld Jerusalem Jerusalem Post Jesus Jesus Christ Jewish Genetics Jewish History Jewish Intellectuals Jewish Power Jewish Power Party Jewish Supremacism JFK Assassination JFK Jr. Jihadis Jill Stein Jimmy Carter Jingoism JINSA Joe Lieberman Joe Rogan John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John F. Kennedy John Hagee John Kirby John Kiriakou John McCain John McLaughlin John Mearsheimer John Paul Joker Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Greenblatt Jonathan Pollard Jordan Peterson Joseph Goebbels Joseph McCarthy Josh Gottheimer Josh Paul Journalism Judaism Judea Judge George Daniels Judicial System Judith Miller Julian Assange Jussie Smollett Justice Justin Trudeau Kaboom Kahanists Kaiser Wilhelm Kamala Harris Kamala On Her Knees Kanye West Karabakh War 2020 Karen Kwiatkowski Karine Jean-Pierre Karmelo Anthony Kash Patel Kashmir Katy Perry Kay Bailey Hutchison Kazakhstan Keir Starmer Kenneth Marcus Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Williamson Khazars Kids Kim Jong Un Kinship Kkk KKKrazy Glue Of The Coalition Of The Fringes Knesset Kompromat Korea Korean War Kosovo Kristi Noem Ku Klux Klan Kubrick Kurds Kushner Foundation Kyle Rittenhouse Kyrie Irving Language Laos Larry Ellison Larry C. Johnson Late Obama Age Collapse Latin America Latinos Laura Loomer Law Lawfare LDNR Lead Poisoning Leahy Amendments Leahy Law Lebanon Lee Kuan Yew Lenin Leo Frank Leo Strauss Let's Talk About My Hair LGBT LGBTI Liberal Opposition Liberal Whites Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libya Lindsey Graham Linguistics Literacy Literature Lithuania Litvinenko Living Standards Liz Cheney Liz Truss Lloyd Austin long-range-missile-defense Longevity Looting Lord Of The Rings Lorde Los Angeles Loudoun County Louis Farrakhan Love And Marriage Low-fat Lukashenko Lula Lynchings Lyndon B Johnson Lyndon Johnson Madeleine Albright Mafia MAGA Magda Goebbels Magnitsky Act Mahmoud Abbas Malaysia Malaysian Airlines MH17 Manufacturing Mao Zedong Maoism Map Marco Rubio Maria Butina Maria Corina Machado Marijuana Marine Le Pen Marjorie Taylor Greene Mark Levin Mark Milley Mark Steyn Mark Warner Market Economy Martin Luther King Martin Scorsese Marvel Marx Marxism Masculinity Mass Immigration Mass Shootings Mate Choice Mathematics Matt Gaetz Max Blumenthal Max Boot Max Weber Maxine Waters Mayans McCain McCain/POW McDonald's Meat Media Media Bias Medicine Medieval Christianity Medieval Russia Mediterranean Diet Medvedev Megan McCain Meghan Markle Mein Obama Mel Gibson Men With Gold Chains Meng Wanzhou Mental Health Mental Illness Meritocracy Merkel Merkel Youth Merkel's Boner Merrick Garland Mexico MH 17 MI-6 Michael Bloomberg Michael Collins PIper Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lind Michael McFaul Michael Moore Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michelle Goldberg Michelle Ma Belle Michelle Obama Microaggressions Middle Ages Middle East Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Johnson Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mike Waltz Mikhael Gorbachev Miles Mathis Militarized Police Military Military Analysis Military Budget Military History Military Spending Military Technology Millennials Milner Group Minimum Wage Minneapolis Minorities Minsk Accords Miriam Adelson Miscegenation Miscellaneous Misdreavus Mishima Missile Defense Mitch McConnell Mitt Romney Mixed-Race MK-Ultra Mohammed Bin Salman Monarchy Mondoweiss Money Mongolia Mongols Monkeypox Monopoly Monotheism Monroe Doctrine Moon Landing Hoax Moon Landings Morality Mormonism Mormons Mortality Mortgage Moscow Mossad Movies Muhammad Multiculturalism Multipolarity Music Muslim Ban Muslims Mussolini NAEP Naftali Bennett Nakba Nancy Pelos Nancy Pelosi Narendra Modi NASA Natanz Nation Of Hate Nation Of Islam National Assessment Of Educational Progress National Debt National Endowment For Democracy National Review National Security Strategy National Socialism National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans Natural Gas Nature Vs. Nurture Navalny Affair Navy Standards Nazis Nazism Neandertals Neanderthals Nehru Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Neoreaction Nesta Webster Netherlands Never Again Education Act New Cold War New Dark Age New Deal New Silk Road New Tes New Testament New World Order New York New York City New York Times New Zealand New Zealand Shooting NFL Nicholas II Nicholas Wade Nick Eberstadt Nick Fuentes Nicolas Maduro Nietzsche Niger Nigeria Nike Nikki Haley NIMBY Nina Jankowicz Noam Chomsky Nobel Peace Prize Nobel Prize Nord Stream Nord Stream Pipelines Nordics Norman Braman Norman Finkelstein North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway Novorossiya NSA NSO Group Nuclear Energy Nuclear Power Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Nuremberg Nutrition Nvidia NYPD Obama Obama Presidency Obamacare Obesity Obituary Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Wall Street October Surprise OFAC Oil Oil Industry OJ Simpson Olav Scholz Old Testament Oliver Stone Olympics Open Borders OpenThread Opinion Poll Opioids Orban Organized Crime Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Orwell Osama Bin Laden OTFI Ottoman Empire Our Soldiers Speak Out Of Africa Model Paganism Pakistan Pakistani Palantir Palestine Palestinians Palin Pam Bondi Panhandling Papacy Paper Review Parasite Burden Parenting Parenting Paris Attacks Partly Inbred Extended Family Pat Buchanan Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Craig Roberts Paul Findley Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Paypal Peak Oil Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Pentagon Personal Genomics Personality Pete Buttgieg Pete Hegseth Peter Frost Peter Thiel Petro Poroshenko Phil Rushton Philadelphia Philippines Philosophy Phoenicians Phyllis Randall Physiognomy Piers Morgan Pigmentation Pigs Piracy PISA Pizzagate POC Ascendancy Podcast Poetry Poland Police Police State Polio Political Correctness Makes You Stupid Political Dissolution Political Economy Politicians Politics Polling Pollution Polygamy Polygyny Pope Francis Population Population Genetics Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Porn Pornography Portland Portugal Portuguese Post-Apocalypse Postindustrialism Poverty Power Pramila Jayapal PRC Prediction Prescription Drugs President Joe Biden Presidential Race '08 Presidential Race '12 Presidential Race '16 Presidential Race '20 Prince Andrew Prince Harry Princeton University Priti Patel Privatization Progressives Propaganda Prostitution protest Protestantism Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion Proud Boys Psychology Psychometrics Psychopathy Public Health Public Schools Puerto Rico Puritans Putin Putin Derangement Syndrome QAnon Qasem Soleimani Qassem Soleimani Qatar Quantitative Genetics Quiet Skies R2P Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race/IQ Race-Ism Race Riots Rachel Corrie Racial Purism Racial Reality Racialism Racism Rafah Raj Shah Rand Paul Randy Fine Rape Rare Earths Rashida Tlaib Rasputin Rationality Ray McGovern Raymond Chandler Razib Khan Real Estate RealWorld Recep Tayyip Erdogan Reconstruction Red Sea Refugee Crisis Religion Religion And Philosophy Rentier Reparations Reprint Republican Party Republicans Review Revisionism Rex Tillerson RFK Assassination Ricci Richard Dawkins Richard Goldberg Richard Grenell Richard Haas Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Rightwing Cinema Riots R/k Theory RMAX Robert A. Heinlein Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Ford Robert Kagan Robert Kraft Robert Maxwell Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Reich Robots Rock Music Roe Vs. Wade Roger Waters Rolling Stone Roman Empire Romania Romans Romanticism Rome Ron DeSantis Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rotherham Rothschilds Roy Cohn RT International Rudy Giuliani Rush Limbaugh Russiagate Russian Demography Russian Elections 2018 Russian History Russian Media Russian Military Russian Nationalism Russian Occupation Government Russian Orthodox Church Russian Reaction Russians Russophobes Russophobia Rwanda Ryan Dawson Sabrina Rubin Erdely Sacha Baron Cohen Sacklers Sadism Sailer Strategy Sailer's First Law Of Female Journalism Saint Peter Tear Down This Gate! Saint-Petersburg Salman Rushie Salt Sam Altman Sam Bankman-Fried Sam Francis Samantha Power Samson Option San Bernadino Massacre Sandy Hook Sapir-Whorf SAT Satan Satanic Age Satanism Saudi Arabia Scandal Schizophrenia Science Fiction Scooter Libby Scotland Scott Bessent Scott Ritter Scrabble Secession Self Determination Self Indulgence Semites Serbia Sergei Lavrov Sergei Skripal Sergey Glazyev Seth Rich Sex Sex Differences Sexism Sexual Harassment Sexual Selection Sexuality Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shakespeare Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shireen Abu Akleh Shmuley Boteach Shoah Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shulamit Aloni Shurat HaDin Sigal Mandelker Sigar Pearl Mandelker Sigmund Freud Silicon Valley Singapore Sinotriumph Six Day War Sixties SJWs Skin Color Slavery Slavery Reparations Slavs Smart Fraction Social Justice Warriors Social Media Social Science Socialism Society Sociobiology Sociology Sodium Solzhenitsyn Somalia Sotomayor South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea Southeast Asia Soviet History Soviet Union Sovok Space Space Exploration Space Program Spain Spanish Spanish River High School SPLC Sport Sports Srebrenica Stabby Somali Staffan Stage Stalinism Standardized Tests Star Trek Star Wars Starvation Comparisons State Department Statistics Statue Of Liberty Steny Hoyer Stephen Cohen Stephen Jay Gould Stereotypes Steroids Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steve Witkoff Steven Pinker Steven Witkoff Strait Of Hormuz Strategic Ambiguity Stuart Levey Stuart Seldowitz Student Debt Stuff White People Like Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subhas Chandra Bose Subprime Mortgage Crisis Suburb Suella Braverman Sugar Suicide Superintelligence Supreme Court Surveillance Susan Glasser Svidomy Sweden Switzerland Symington Amendment Syria Syrian Civil War Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Take Action Taliban Talmud Tariff Tariffs Tatars Taxation Taxes Technical Considerations Technology Ted Cruz Telegram Television Terrorism Terrorists Terry McAuliffe Tesla Testing Testosterone Tests Texas THAAD Thailand The AK The American Conservative The Bell Curve The Bible The Black Autumn The Cathedral The Confederacy The Constitution The Eight Banditos The Family The Free World The Great Awokening The Guardian The Left The Middle East The New York Times The South The States The Zeroth Amendment To The Constitution Theranos Theresa May Third World Thomas Jefferson Thomas Massie Thomas Moorer Thought Crimes Tiananmen Massacre Tibet Tiger Mom TikTok TIMSS Tom Cotton Tom Massie Tom Wolfe Tony Blair Tony Blinken Tony Kleinfeld Too Many White People Torture Trade Trans Fat Trans Fats Transgender Transgenderism Transhumanism Translation Translations Transportation Travel Trayvon Martin Treason Trolling True Redneck Stereotypes Trump Trump Derangement Syndrome Trump Peace Plan Trust Trust Culture Tsarist Russia Tucker Carlson Tulsa Tulsi Gabbard Turkey Turks TWA 800 Twins Twitter Ucla UFOs UK Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unbearable Whiteness Unemployment United Kingdom United Nations United Nations General Assembly United Nations Security Council United States Universal Basic Income UNRWA Urbanization Ursula Von Der Leyen Uruguay US Blacks US Capitol Storming 2021 US Civil War II US Congress US Constitution US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 US State Department USA USAID USS Liberty USSR Uyghurs Uzbekistan Vaccination Vaccines Valdimir Putin Valerie Plame Vdare Venezuela Victor Davis Hanson Victoria Nuland Victorian England Video Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Viktor Orban Viktor Yanukovych Violence Vioxx Virginia Vitamin D Vivek Ramaswamy Vladimir Zelensky Volodymyr Zelensky Vote Fraud Voting Rights Voting Rights Act Vulcan Society Waffen SS Wall Street Walmart Wang Ching Wei Wang Jingwei War War Crimes War Guilt War In Donbass War On Christmas War On Terror War Powers War Powers Act Warhammer Washington DC WASPs Watergate Wealth Wealth Inequality Web Traffic Weight WEIRDO Welfare Wendy Sherman West Bank Western Decline Western European Marriage Pattern Western Hypocrisy Western Media Western Religion Western Revival Westerns White America White Americans White Death White Flight White Guilt White Helmets White Liberals White Man's Burden White Nationalism White Nationalists White People White Privilege White Race White Racialism White Slavery White Supremacy Whiterpeople Whites Whoopi Goldberg Wikileaks Wikipedia Wildfires William Browder William F. Buckley William Kristol William Latson William McGonagle William McRaven Wilmot Robertson WINEP Winston Churchill Woke Capital Women Woodrow Wilson Workers Working Class World Bank World Economic Forum World Health Organization World Population World War G World War H World War Hair World War I World War III World War R World War T WTF WVS WWII Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yahya Sinwar Yair Lapid Yemen Yevgeny Prigozhin Yoav Gallant Yogi Berra's Restaurant Yoram Hazony YouTube Yugoslavia Yuval Noah Harari Zbigniew Brzezinski Zimbabwe Zionism Zionists Zohran Mamdani Zvika Fogel
Nothing found
All Commenters • My
Comments
• Followed
Commenters
 All / By Ron Unz
    Back when I was a young child, I used to enjoy watching my Saturday morning cartoons, and they were often quite amusing. More decades have passed than I'd like to consider and my memories are garbled, but I recall that those cartoons occasionally featured a character called something like Ugh the Cave-Man. Ugh was always...
  • @Greg Garros
    @Avery


    She was no felon.
     
    Doesn't appear she had any previous felony convictions.

    However, what she was doing (blocking ICE vehicles/officers with her car when they are trying to detain someone) appears to be a crime:

    1. Obstruction of Justice: Under federal law, obstructing an officer in the performance of their official duties is a serious offense. This includes actions such as physically blocking ICE agents, providing false information, or using intimidation to prevent an arrest. Depending on the circumstances, individuals could face misdemeanor or felony charges, leading to fines and potential jail time.
     
    https://www.birdsall-law.com/legal-implications-of-interfering-with-immigration-enforcement

    Replies: @Same old same old, @Ron Unz

    However, what she was doing (blocking ICE vehicles/officers with her car when they are trying to detain someone) appears to be a crime:

    I really haven’t followed the details of the case, but is that correct? Wasn’t she “a legal observer,” intending to provide advice to protestors who might be arrested? From the videos, it’s not clear to me that she was actually blocking anything where she was parked.

  • @Anonymous
    @Ron Unz


    The one you highlight appears to show that the car hit the ICE agent, which seems rather implausible since he afterwards showed not the slightest sign of any physical injury. But because of the positioning of the camera, what actually happened is far from clear.
     
    Hmm…

    ICE agent who shot Renee Good suffered internal bleeding, officials say

    By Nicole Sganga, Jennifer Jacobs
    Updated on: January 14, 2026

    The Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent who fatally shot Renee Good last week in Minneapolis, Jonathan Ross, suffered internal bleeding to the torso following the incident, according to two U.S. officials briefed on his medical condition…

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ice-officer-who-shot-renee-good-internal-injuries-sources-say/

     

    Wait, we need a second opinion! Please forward those CT scans to our resident armchair biomechanical/accident reconstruction expert to examine… from his armchair!


    https://static01.nyt.com/images/2016/01/14/us/15harvard-web1/15harvard-web1-superJumbo.jpg

     

    Replies: @Antiwar7, @Truth Vigilante, @Ron Unz

    The Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent who fatally shot Renee Good last week in Minneapolis, Jonathan Ross, suffered internal bleeding to the torso following the incident, according to two U.S. officials briefed on his medical condition

    When “anonymous government officials” say something about Iraqi WMDs or ICE agent injuries, I’m skeptical.

    Like I’ve saying all along, although there’s one blurry video taken from one side that seems to show the SUV striking the ICE agent, there were several other videos I saw taken from the other side that seemed to show it missing him. People should watch all the different videos together and make up their own minds.

    However, it’s absolutely undeniable that the ICE agent was casually walking around afterwards, showing not the slightest sign of any pain or injury. If he’d actually been hit by the SUV hard enough to cause internal bleeding, that seems extremely unlikely to me.

    If those claims—mostly by “anonymous government officials”—were true, why not release the medical records, CT scans, and X-rays? Is there anything deeply confidential about a CT scan or an X-ray?

    The Trump officials like Kristi Noem all immediately declared the victim “a domestic terrorist.” I strongly suspect that the claims about internal bleeding and injuries are about as realistic and accurate accurate.

  • One of the most flawlessly executed special forces operations of the last half-century took place in 1979 when Soviet commandos stormed Afghanistan's heavily defended presidential palace, killing Hafizullah Amin and several of his top aides. This allowed Moscow to install a replacement government much more congenial to its interests, though the result was the long...
  • @littlereddot
    @wojtek


    Don’t you worry little red troll, the only shortcoming of his description of the USSR is that people might think it was somewhat funny. It wasn’t. Everything else is spot on.
     
    You are right. Poland is far funnier than the USSR.

    ~64
    Q: How do you know you're flying over Poland?
    A: Toilet paper hanging on the clotheslines.

    Replies: @wojtek

    Q: How do you know you’re flying over Poland?
    A: Toilet paper hanging on the clotheslines.

    Is that what the poorly educated chinese (the ones who don’t know what momentum is 🙂 ) do these days? Project their own experiences onto a country they never saw? 🙂 That’s actually a coping mechanism. Not a good one, but whatever works for your tired little brain, my little red chink 🙂

  • @j2
    @wojtek

    Yes, but on the other hand, there were much more jokes in those days. The whole Poland was a joke (at least for a Western tourist) with those tiny cars and money exchangers catching you already on the airport.

    Replies: @wojtek

    At some point the whole system became a joke. But I promise you it wasn’t funny even then, and at first there weren’t even any jokes.

  • Back when I was a young child, I used to enjoy watching my Saturday morning cartoons, and they were often quite amusing. More decades have passed than I'd like to consider and my memories are garbled, but I recall that those cartoons occasionally featured a character called something like Ugh the Cave-Man. Ugh was always...
  • Great article Ron with great links to follow up.

    We are truly living in dystopian nightmare heading towards a Soviet style gulag.

    Trumps comments about being controlled by his own morality only are truly shocking and show the depth of his ignorance about the limits of presidential power. He has become comparable to Caligula as you mentioned in a previous article.

    The power of ICE and its position as storm troopers/pretorian guard of the regime is truly frightening.

  • @littlereddot
    @Rich


    Even with the release of the video showing the agent being struck by the suv,
     
    Agent struck by a 5000 pound SUV, and he is still standing, not flung to the ground, and is somehow and steady and composed enough to shoot 3 rounds into the woman?

    even with the video showing her staring directly at the agent she hit,
     
    Not sure I understand you.
    Was she staring at the agent with the bullets in her?
    Or did she stare at the agent before she allegedly hit him?

    And these people are eligible to vote and sit on juries. No wonder everything just keeps getting worse in this country.
     

    In this I agree with you.
    Only my definition of "these people" is the opposite of yours.

    Replies: @Rich

    You, sir, are an example of what I was writing. The video is available, showing him get struck by the suv, and you still argue he wasn’t hit. Your mind can’t accept reality. Nothing can be done for you. Good luck in your future endeavors.

  • @Rich
    Over 500 comments and the people who thought the agent shot her from the side, through the driver's side window still believe that. Even with the release of the video showing the agent being struck by the suv, even with the video showing her staring directly at the agent she hit, even with photos available showing the bullet hole in the front windshield. It's crazy. And these people are eligible to vote and sit on juries. No wonder everything just keeps getting worse in this country. Crazy.

    Replies: @littlereddot

    Even with the release of the video showing the agent being struck by the suv,

    Agent struck by a 5000 pound SUV, and he is still standing, not flung to the ground, and is somehow and steady and composed enough to shoot 3 rounds into the woman?

    even with the video showing her staring directly at the agent she hit,

    Not sure I understand you.
    Was she staring at the agent with the bullets in her?
    Or did she stare at the agent before she allegedly hit him?

    And these people are eligible to vote and sit on juries. No wonder everything just keeps getting worse in this country.

    In this I agree with you.
    Only my definition of “these people” is the opposite of yours.

    • Replies: @Rich
    @littlereddot

    You, sir, are an example of what I was writing. The video is available, showing him get struck by the suv, and you still argue he wasn't hit. Your mind can't accept reality. Nothing can be done for you. Good luck in your future endeavors.

  • Back when I was in college, more years ago than I'd like to consider, one of my majors was Classical History, and I did quite a lot of original research in that field. Then after I graduated and began my doctoral studies in Theoretical Physics, I took a little time to write up some of...
  • @wojtek
    @littlereddot

    You're worrying way too much about Germanistan - I think you're the only one :)

    Focus on giving back Taiwan to the Japanese.
    New Republic of Formosa.

    Judging from the poor propaganda, I am starting to wonder if Chinese communism is as efficient as the Soviet one was. I'm curious if the new Japanese prime minister will test it. She seems to have balls.

    Replies: @littlereddot

    New Republic of Formosa.

    Sorry to burst your bubble. Republic of China is hard written into their constitution.

  • One of the most flawlessly executed special forces operations of the last half-century took place in 1979 when Soviet commandos stormed Afghanistan's heavily defended presidential palace, killing Hafizullah Amin and several of his top aides. This allowed Moscow to install a replacement government much more congenial to its interests, though the result was the long...
  • @wojtek
    @littlereddot

    Don't you worry little red troll, the only shortcoming of his description of the USSR is that people might think it was somewhat funny. It wasn't. Everything else is spot on.

    Replies: @j2, @littlereddot

    Don’t you worry little red troll, the only shortcoming of his description of the USSR is that people might think it was somewhat funny. It wasn’t. Everything else is spot on.

    You are right. Poland is far funnier than the USSR.

    ~64
    Q: How do you know you’re flying over Poland?
    A: Toilet paper hanging on the clotheslines.

    • Replies: @wojtek
    @littlereddot


    Q: How do you know you’re flying over Poland?
    A: Toilet paper hanging on the clotheslines.
     
    Is that what the poorly educated chinese (the ones who don't know what momentum is :) ) do these days? Project their own experiences onto a country they never saw? :) That's actually a coping mechanism. Not a good one, but whatever works for your tired little brain, my little red chink :)
  • Back when I was a young child, I used to enjoy watching my Saturday morning cartoons, and they were often quite amusing. More decades have passed than I'd like to consider and my memories are garbled, but I recall that those cartoons occasionally featured a character called something like Ugh the Cave-Man. Ugh was always...
  • @wojtek
    @littlereddot


    If he did, the momentum from a 5000 pound SUV would have sent him flying.
     
    These little chinese red trolls are getting more and more dumb by the minute.

    FYI, momentum is mass times velocity. Go back to school.

    Replies: @littlereddot

    FYI, momentum is mass times velocity. Go back to school.

    LOL, obviously you don’t understand English as well as you think you do.

    The word momentum has been in use far longer than it has been used in the modern scientific sense.

    Your are like an idiot saying “a cuttlefish is not a fish. A fish has scales and rayed-fins”

    This idiot can only understand the word “fish” from the modern scientific definition. He doesn’t realise that for centuries prior, the word fish meant “an animal that lives in the water”. That is why you have shellfish, starfish, jellyfish etc.

    Your schooling has obviously not been completed yet, dumb Polack.

  • @wojtek
    @Leif

    Let me try to provide you with a simple analogy: imagine a gangster steals something from you, and then when the courts many many years later eventually rule in your favor and award you some partial compensation, the gangster comes back and "offers" to "allow" you to keep part of that compensation, but demands some of it. Do you really call this a concession on behalf of the gangster?

    You see, this is a simple question of language and values. It has nothing to do with history of any kind. And if you can't get those right then you have no business discussing complicated geopolitics.

    As for some misinformed imagination that Poland had anything to do with Gdańsk, you should check your history - Gdańsk was under the mandate of the League of Nations and it was Britain and France which controlled its fate, with a Swiss commissar in place in 1939. Poland was allowed to keep a guard platoon, protecting its small storage facility there - they never set foot beyond that facility.

    As for believing in German promises and a "mutual defense-alliance", Poland actually had in place a valid non-aggression pact with Germany. We know how that one worked out. Or how the promises made to Czechs were kept. So please - if you want to be seriously treated - get real.
    Only a moron would believe hitler's promises.

    Still, for a long time there's been a debate going on in Poland, that perhaps we should have sold our Christian souls to the devil and should have joined the nazis and be treated like Czechs were. Instead of like we were treated by the sick german genocidal maniacs.

    My personal opinion varies. But at the end of the day I usually do like my moral superiority over the likes of you, resulting from the hecatombe we suffered, which your little nazi rotted brain (vide calling Holocaust a Polish invention) is obviously incapable of comprehending.

    PS. FYI, Rudolf's poor attempts were "destroyed" by the Sehn Institute and he has not been able to recover since.

    Replies: @littlereddot

    Gdańsk

    Danzig has a much better ring to it.

    The Germans were there long before the Poles.

  • Over 500 comments and the people who thought the agent shot her from the side, through the driver’s side window still believe that. Even with the release of the video showing the agent being struck by the suv, even with the video showing her staring directly at the agent she hit, even with photos available showing the bullet hole in the front windshield. It’s crazy. And these people are eligible to vote and sit on juries. No wonder everything just keeps getting worse in this country. Crazy.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
    @Rich


    Even with the release of the video showing the agent being struck by the suv,
     
    Agent struck by a 5000 pound SUV, and he is still standing, not flung to the ground, and is somehow and steady and composed enough to shoot 3 rounds into the woman?

    even with the video showing her staring directly at the agent she hit,
     
    Not sure I understand you.
    Was she staring at the agent with the bullets in her?
    Or did she stare at the agent before she allegedly hit him?

    And these people are eligible to vote and sit on juries. No wonder everything just keeps getting worse in this country.
     

    In this I agree with you.
    Only my definition of "these people" is the opposite of yours.

    Replies: @Rich

  • @Ron Unz
    @WingsofaDove


    Anglin is right about ICE. Its real target is the white male pro constitutional, pro 1st and pro second and pro fifth amendment libertarian US citizen population. I’ll explain.

    First, the murder of Ms. Good was a planned mafia style hit. Check my link below from 2014...

    The idiot libs calling this guy stupid and untrained don’t recognize his skill as a mafia style ice assassin.

    They also think he was ‘angry’ at being taunted by the victim’s ‘wife’. Not at all, he was happy he had even more cover for his cold blooded crime...

    The response by Krisi Noem and Trump was obviously scripted IN ADVANCE; They were ready immediately with the marketing style framing. They’ve probably tested this framing with focus groups already.

    Immediately the hired influencers mentioned above, Fuentes, Walsh, Pool and more provide MAGA with the proper response. And the dummy MAGA whites eat it up, just like they followed Fuentes on Jan 6 while he kept his pansy ass safe, because they are dummies and easily manipulated via their low self esteem as dummy whites who can’t deal with women as non subservient and while wanting to be the boss they are too dumb or lazy to get the diploma or training to qualify for being the boss. lumpen proletariat they used to call them, right?

    Meanwhile the Jewish controlled state apparatus has created the situation and the precedent. Strategy of Tension. It’s in the handbook. The dummy whites led by paid influencers will cheer on the increase of state repression giving it legitimacy. The intelligent constitutional whites will at some point resist as they become the target. Suddenly the script will flip and an incident will provide the excuse to go after the most effective group of resistors, the constitutional whites who are not dummies, who work, own businesses, have skills and education BUT do not accept a complete Jewish/Zionist/Banker takeover of their country. Then the culling of white men will begin in earnest, just like it has in Ukraine.
     
    I'll admit I'd never remotely considered that possibility. I'm not "conspiratorial" enough to necessarily accept it, but it's an interesting idea nonetheless.

    If ICE can get away with shooting three times in the head an inoffensive blond 37-year-old mother of three, ICE can get away with absolutely anything. So that would set a very powerful precedent.

    Meanwhile, the fact that she was a liberal lesbian "poet" triggers all of the dim-witted Pavlovian right-wingers to loudly endorse the shooting and demand that the ICE officer escape any punishment.

    So that particular victim was absolutely perfect for this sort of ruthless strategy.

    I still think it's much more likely that everything was pure coincidence, but it's still an interesting theory regardless.

    Replies: @WingsofaDove, @Rrrrrqqq1, @Greg Garros, @notanonymoushere, @Felpudinho, @Eustace Tilley (not)

    ‘…she was a liberal lesbian “poet”…’

    So grateful for your literary criticism here.

  • >”They Have It. We Want It. We Take It.”

    What about illegal immigrants in this context?

    It’s obviously not a perfect analogy, but vis-a-vis ‘not having, wanting, and taking’, it’s not totally inapt either — as a class (think class action lawsuit), don’t illegal immigrants see something they ‘don’t have’, but ‘want’, namely residence in the US, the benefits of living in the US (among white people, incidentally), or maybe the right to live in the US, and then don’t they ‘take’ what they ‘want’? — don’t they arrogate the right to live in the US?

    In the short bio you post (with a very outdated foto), it says you ran for governor ‘on a conservative, pro-immigrant platform’, and ‘campaigned as a leading opponent of Prop. 187′, which you dishonestly describe as an ‘anti-immigration initiative’ (Prop 187 was about providing state services to illegal immigrants; California voters could not affect federal immigration law).

    At the least it seems you were willing to tolerate ‘not having, wanting, and taking’ by illegal immigrants — perhaps you saw nothing wrong with it at all.

    Prop 187 may have been an ‘anti-immigration initiative’ to some, but its specific intent was to ‘deny access to social services, non-emergency health services, and public education’ to illegal immigrants, which was not unreasonable (denying public education clashed with the 1982 Supreme Court decision in Plyer v. Doe).

    So while not necessarily defending anything Trump is doing, regarding ‘not having, wanting, and taking’, this looks like hypocrisy on your part Unz — have your views about that changed?

  • @muh muh
    @Eustace Tilley (not)

    Thank you again.

    IMO, we need to transcend the political dichotomy to see matters clearly. Blood and soil abide only insofar as the will to preserve them exist. Ideology is the decisive factor determining whether that will persists or not. As such, ideology makes all the difference, not blood and soil alone. Fickle as our species may be, it remains incumbent upon us to labor for preservation of that ideology most beneficial to our survival and well being.

    As it stands, our nation is divided roughly in half on the matter of deportation, yet in recent months, there has been a precipitous decline in support for the methods now implemented by ICE. There's even noteworthy dissent on the right. In the short term, it looks as if the bad optics of it are likely to cost Team Trump in the coming midterms.

    So it's improbable that the current push for mass deportation, with all of its attendant unconstitutionality, will result in much more than a slight decrease in illegal immigration while inflaming racial and political tensions domestically. However successful, it certainly will do nothing to forestall the inevitable demographic change brought about by remaining people of color, as white birth rates are nowhere near replacement level and there's very little indication this is going to improve in the near future.

    As such, the notion of dispensing with constitutional law in order to salvage a semblance of it in generations to come appears to be little more than a far-flung flight of fancy. If you believe that law is a product of racial ingenuity, well... you just won't have the requisite numbers to revive it.

    I realize this won't convince those who believe constitutional law depends on white folk to survive, but abiding by it is certainly a more effective means of persuading people it's worth preserving than encouraging the jackboot thuggery of Team Trump on a promise you can never keep.

    If you agree with Pierre's assessment of the situation, this shouldn't be too hard to apprehend.

    Replies: @Eustace Tilley (not)

    Thanks once more returned.

    I feel like Dante as he and Virgil spiral downward on their tour if the Inferno. I feel increasingly disconnected from the public Clown Show that calls itself “American politics”. I see Trump, held down by demons as molten gold is poured down his throat.

    I shrink back in horror: “O, woeful sight! What can be the extent of this man’s crimes?” Virgil: “Posing as a champion of the people, he attained the highest office only to become the vassal of a foreign prince, all in return for gold.”

    He deserves to be thrown out of office. Of course, the Democrats will then resume their project of destroying the country, all with the usual “good intentions” of the clueless reformer.

  • @Rich
    @littlereddot

    Look, the video shows him being struck by the car. If that's not enough for you guys, nothing is. You just want, or need, to believe that this woman was killed in cold blood. I'm sure you were all-in on hands up, knee on neck, out getting skittles, too. If you can't see the agent getting hit in the video, there's just nothing else to argue about. You live in an alternate reality.

    Replies: @Rurik, @littlereddot, @Joe Levantine

    “ You live in an alternate reality.”

    In the world of AI, we have to accept that we all live in an alternate reality. The comments of littlereddot cast a real shadow of doubt over the authenticity of the video.

    If the video is real, then all we can say is that she got what she deserved.

    Unfortunately, this is not the first time that we see American security forces act in an unhinged way. In contrast, I remember the German policemen pointing his gun at the Iraqi who charged his car into the Christmas market last year. The restraint of the German policeman was outstanding, yelling on the man to leave his car for more than one minute without shooting. That I consider to be a security agent acting with restraint.

  • @Greg Garros
    @Lawrence Erickson


    Yeah, I don’t think I’ve seen a single take on this that didn’t align with the person’s preexisting views on ICE, mine included.
     
    ^I think that's probably the truest thing that's been said in this entire thread of comments and in the larger national media discussion.

    It seems like everyone is using this particular ICE killing as a proxy for a larger discussion about ICE's right to exist and perform its basic function of detaining "illegal aliens" (foreigners here unlawfully), and whether we should have a border etc. It's devolving back to the 2017-18 "kids in cages!" level of discussion. It's George Floyd 2.0.

    I think Trump is a disaster, but there's no evidence that this incident is anything other than ICE performing its legal duties ---> ICE meets obstructionists/organized provocateurs ---> Provocateurs go overboard. ---> rogue ICE agent apparently goes overboard in response, resulting in tragedy.

    These tragedies happen with local, state, and sometimes federal law enforcement on occasion, especially when people do what you describe:

    If you don’t want to risk your life, then don’t fuck with the police. Don’t insert yourself in a law enforcement situation
     
    It's a generally rare thing, and a case-by-case thing. I assume Renee Good's estate will have the right to sue ICE here, and they will probably win a few million bucks.

    I haven't heard one person say that the detainments those ICE officers were trying to carry out were illegal or outside the scope of ICE's duties.


    Also - Oversight and control of ICE was transferred to the Dept of Homeland Security (DHS) in 2003 (after 9/11). If this incident is going to trigger a larger discussion about whether ICE should exist, some discussion of its origin is warranted, but I'm seeing none of that.

    I’m more concerned about having no immigration enforcement than I am about the remote possibility that it could be turned against Americans.
     
    ^Another good point.

    Trump ran 3 times on solving this immigration issue and its the only reason he ever became President. Arguably the only federal agency that deserved to have its budget increased is ICE. An increase is ICE agents and an increase in immigration judges to deal with the cases is a commensurate response to the size of the immigration problem that exists.

    But of course, like everything, the Israel-loyalists tend to hijack these programs for their own purposes, so I'm willing to criticize ICE when it targets foreigners for wrong-think, like those college students and op-ed writers who were abducted for criticizing Israel. That's a separate issue. But these people harassing ICE couldn't make that distinction if you beat them over the head with it.

    Replies: @muh muh, @Truth Vigilante

    Trump ran 3 times on solving this immigration issue and its the only reason he ever became President.

    Well …. NO …. in fact. That was a peripheral issue for many voters.
    While campaigning in 2016, Donald Chump said:

    1) That he’d appoint a Special Prosecutor immediately upon becoming Prez, to investigate Hillary.

    2) That he’d look into 9/11 and tell is ‘who really did it’ (and release the entirety of the JFK files).

    3) That he’d sit down with Putin and try to negotiate with him, to deescalate the tensions.

    4) That he’d stop with the ‘stupid wars’

    5) That he’d build a wall on the southern border and get the Mexicans to pay for it.
    And … much more.

    Well then Mr Garrulous, how did all that work out?
    The Orange baboon did not keep a single promise.

    Meanwhile, if I was eligible to vote in U.S elections and was inclined to vote, my NUMBER ONE reason for voting for Donald Chump would be for his pledge to REINVESTIGATE 9/11.
    Because, as Christopher Bollyn says:

    SOLVING 9/11 ENDS THE WARS.

    Did you comprehend that Greg Garrulous?
    Solving 9/11 entails:

    [MORE]

    i) Releasing all the evidence that clearly demonstrates ZOG involvement.
    (ie: the Apartheid Israeli state’s Mossad and all the domestic traitors in the U.S Gubmint/Military/Intel agencies that aided and abetted the orchestration of this False Flag).

    ii) Thereafter, these Talmudic misfits are to be rounded up, prosecuted, incarcerated and then hung, drawn and quartered.
    (Not necessarily in that order – since the trial can always be conducted posthumously).

    Bottom Line: Once the perpetrators of the 9/11 False Flag are out of the way (ie: the core structure of ZOG), we NO LONGER NEED TO WORRY about the immigration issue, chronic inflation (caused by the ZOG owned Federal Reserve), the need for having and funding over 900 bases in 130 countries, the funding for the bloated MISSS – Military Industrial Security Surveillance State – or pretty much anything else.

    It was this cartel of Talmudic financiers that controlled the entirety of the western financial and political systems, THEY were behind all of America’s (and the world’s) ailments.
    With ZOG cleansed from the system, THE WHOLE WORLD RETURNS TO NORMAL.

    So Greg Garrulous, you have your priorities all wrong.
    When shape shifting reptilians rule over you, one must CUT OFF THE HEAD OF THE SNAKE.
    Doing anything else is just applying a band-aid to a severed Carotid artery.
    (That’s the artery Charlie Kirk bled to death from – the artery severed by the Jewish miscreants).

  • One of the most flawlessly executed special forces operations of the last half-century took place in 1979 when Soviet commandos stormed Afghanistan's heavily defended presidential palace, killing Hafizullah Amin and several of his top aides. This allowed Moscow to install a replacement government much more congenial to its interests, though the result was the long...
  • @John Johnson
    @QCIC

    Stop kidding around. The US satellites give real time intel on Russian air defenses for major targets so the drones can avoid these or spoof them. US satellites are much better at this than European ones.

    You are speculating on what is provided by US satellites. Such capabilities are not known to the public.

    What we do know is that:
    1. Russian oil refinery locations are public information
    2. The Russians are on video trying to defend the refineries with small arms fire

    I can provide the video if you would like. The Russians are on video multiple times where they fill the air with small arms fire. That is much less advanced than the German flak cannons of WW2 as they were firing based on complex calculations.

    If the Russians are shooting AK-47s at slow moving Ukrainian drones then there is no reason to assume that some US technology is required to attack the refineries.

    I'm not being silly. Like other Russian sympathizers you are in denial of where Russia is at in the war. They do not have enough S-400s to defend all of their refineries. Ukraine continues to launch sorties using a combination of Migs and Western missiles. Funny a certain alt-right blogger at Unz told us that the Russia has total air superiority.

    I guess not.

    Having our Congress make a fuss over this entirely US-created Ukraine disaster would be enormously helpful by moving the needle of public opinion. That is why we say, “Write your Congressman!”.

    Well the UN voted 143-5 that Russia is at fault and that 5 includes Russia, Belarus and North Korea.

    Congress passed military aid under Biden and most of it has been sent. Ending the remaining aid would not end the war. Europe can fund Ukraine for two more years.

    Replies: @nokangaroos

    If the “Europeans” were in any way shape or form European they´d grok the
    keeheefjews are bombing them, at the behest of the Great Satan, and stomp
    them out instead of offering Greenland (and Iceland; and …).

  • Back when I was a young child, I used to enjoy watching my Saturday morning cartoons, and they were often quite amusing. More decades have passed than I'd like to consider and my memories are garbled, but I recall that those cartoons occasionally featured a character called something like Ugh the Cave-Man. Ugh was always...
  • @Poupon Marx
    @Truth Vigilante

    Most discussions of WWII have degenerated to mere narratives and memes. They also are repetitive, low on verifiable evidence, and "out of the box search and consideration". That requires individual relentless curiosity.

    On my own, I often wondered how Hitler financed so much of a military, social, and public works without concomitant trade increases. I had commented on this using discovered sources, earlier this year, I believe. [Much of your opinions and comments were countered by me and others in previous posts. That's why I encourage you to read my comments regularly]

    Please read the following intrepid report that transgresses cliches, and trite tread worn material.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPyoySkefLs&t=2230s

    Replies: @Truth Vigilante

    Your video is over two hours long.
    So rather than watch all of it and risk brain impairment from hearing the tired old ZOG talking points repeated for the umpteenth time, I just skimmed through it.

    And, as is customary for the more sophisticated propaganda, whilst it draws on actual facts in its explanations, it then extrapolates the wrong conclusions – by making assumptions that fit in with the ‘demonisation of Hitler and the NSDAP’ agenda.

    Poupy, seriously, you are in desperate need of some tough love.
    I can’t help but laugh when you hand out advice to me and others, telling us to be more ‘open minded’ and not set in our ways.
    That really cracks me up when I hear that coming from you.

    You see, and I know a ton of the UR readership will agree, there is no one whose views are MORE SET IN STONE than yours.

    I’ve suggested (for your benefit), that you read all of John Wear’s world class book ‘Germany’s War’.
    I even graciously provided the link* for you in previous UR threads that you were engaged in.

    (*For the benefit of UR readers who want to learn TRUE WWII history, authored by a colossus of integrity, click on the link below):
    https://www.unz.com/book/john_wear__germanys-war/

    But did you read it? Did you attempt to read one of the chapters?
    (I suspect you haven’t looked at a single page).
    And you likely won’t attempt to, because it will eviscerate your cartoonish/ZOG inspired depiction of how WWII transpired and shatter your illusions.

    Yes, John Wear’s book (accompanied by countless hundreds – if not 1000’s – of citations and footnotes which comprehensively back up his claims), will turn your world upside down.
    I suspect that you’re too afraid to risk the likelihood that you’ll be forced to leave your cocooned little world of Mass Formation Psychosis, the one that reinforces your present flawed belief system on historical matters.

    Unlike you, I go out of my way in attempting to falsify my preconceptions on various issues, be that on 9/11, the murders of JFK/RFK/JFK Jr, the Covid Psyop, the alleged Anthropogenic Global Warming or whatever.

    And along the way I’ve had to amend, and at times discard completely, those beliefs I had that no longer withstood scrutiny.
    And I FEEL BETTER for having done that – because by doing so I inch closer to the truth.

    You on the other hand, do NOT seek out the truth.
    What you do seek out is CONFIRMATION BIAS. You only seek out those questionable (often ZOG funded/affiliated) sources that confirm what you were told as a kid.

    ie: that those dastardly Germans invaded ‘us peaceful Greeks’ (you did mention this was your ethnic background as I recall).
    And thus you will never entertain the possibility that the Germans (when viewed as a collective), were anything other than evil.
    And that they, and they ALONE, are entirely responsible for the commencement of WWII.

    Summary: No Nation, No Regime, is ever entirely bad or entirely good.
    You will find countless examples of evil deeds to demonise whatever nation/regime that you choose to put under the microscope. There’s always dirt we can dig out about them.
    But, using any honest metric you choose to apply, you will soon determine that:

    The crimes of the Anglo-Zionist empire alone (during WWII and in the immediate post war years), were perhaps an ORDER OF MAGNITUDE MORE HEINOUS, both in qualitative and quantitative terms, than anything the Germans did during WWII.

    If we were to then add the crimes of the Judeo-Bolshevik Soviet empire with Stalin at the helm (ie: initiatives the latter undertook that were directly responsible for the loss of millions of Soviet citizens and millions more of Soviet POW’s – through his Scorched Earth Policies and other heavy handedness), then the disparity blows out further still.

    And one last thing that you (and others in this webzine) refuse to accept:

    There is NO QUESTION that Hitler and the Third Reich came the closest of all to bringing about the demise of ZOG.
    Unfortunately he was unsuccessful.
    Because the ZOG miscreants manipulated the Allied nations and the Judeo-Bolshevik Soviet Union into sacrificing their blood and treasure by siding with them.

    If you or your forebears are advocating against Hitler and NSDAP Germany, then ipso facto you are ALIGNING WITH ZOG.
    It’s that simple. No need to complicate matters.

    The stupid Serbs sided with ZOG in two World Wars.
    The gullible Poles sided with ZOG by accepting the assurances of FDR and ZOG controlled Gross Britain.
    You stupid Greeks likewise made the worst possible choice.

    ZOG emerged victorious from WWII. The rest of us lost – although to varying degrees.
    What is happening to the U.S today, in western Europe, Australia where I live and elsewhere, is a direct consequence of siding with EVIL in both WWI & II.
    That is the reality.

    • Agree: Monte Cristo
  • One of the most flawlessly executed special forces operations of the last half-century took place in 1979 when Soviet commandos stormed Afghanistan's heavily defended presidential palace, killing Hafizullah Amin and several of his top aides. This allowed Moscow to install a replacement government much more congenial to its interests, though the result was the long...
  • @wojtek
    @littlereddot

    Don't you worry little red troll, the only shortcoming of his description of the USSR is that people might think it was somewhat funny. It wasn't. Everything else is spot on.

    Replies: @j2, @littlereddot

    Yes, but on the other hand, there were much more jokes in those days. The whole Poland was a joke (at least for a Western tourist) with those tiny cars and money exchangers catching you already on the airport.

    • Replies: @wojtek
    @j2

    At some point the whole system became a joke. But I promise you it wasn't funny even then, and at first there weren't even any jokes.

  • Back when I was a young child, I used to enjoy watching my Saturday morning cartoons, and they were often quite amusing. More decades have passed than I'd like to consider and my memories are garbled, but I recall that those cartoons occasionally featured a character called something like Ugh the Cave-Man. Ugh was always...
  • @Anonymous

    A few days ago, a far deadlier ICE incident involving the death of a native-born American citizen reached the national headlines.

    Large numbers of ICE agents had been deployed to Minneapolis, arousing strong opposition from local liberal activists, one of them being a blond 37-year-old mother of three.

    For many generations, white, middle-class Americans have been raised lacking any serious fear of the police. That was certainly the case with the victim as she sat in her parked SUV on the suburban streets of her own city, serving as a legal observer responsible for providing advice to any demonstrators who might be arrested. Some video clips show her treating the nearby ICE troopers with lighthearted scorn, casually ridiculing their activities, which surely must have enraged those militarized federal officers clad in tactical gear.

    The rough sequence of events is clear. She was approached by several of those masked, armed ICE agents who tried to pull her out of her vehicle, so she apparently became alarmed and decided to drive away. This in turn seems to have alarmed one of those ICE agents, who shot her three times in the head, killing her. A few moments earlier, her last words to that ICE officer had been “I ain’t mad at you, dude,” while after firing the fatal shots he can be heard to say “Fucking bitch.”
     
    Do you really expect me to feel bad about some dumb roastie getting domed for physically putting herself in between federal law enforcement and the deportation of Somalian career criminals?

    Replies: @nokangaroos

    The pass-for-white psycho dyke obstructing justice is a metaphor:
    The sense of impunity they cannot lose will be the downfall of all Americans.

  • @littlereddot
    @Rich


    How did he get hit by the front of the car and fire through the windshield?
     
    If he got hit by the front of the car, would he still be standing steady enough to fire 3 shots accurately and in quick succession?

    Have you ever seen a person struck by a car first hand? I have. The person was 3 feet away from me. The impact flung her onto the windshield, hit her head on the windshield, then rolled off the car. Then lying on the street, she foamed at the mouth for 10 minutes before the ambulance arrived. She died later in hospital.

    The ICE agent was certainly not struck by the car. If he did, the momentum from a 5000 pound SUV would have sent him flying. After he got to his feet again, it would have taken him yet more seconds to compose himself enough to shoot off a close 3 shot grouping on the windshield.

    Have you ever fired a rifle after physical activity, or urgent physical activity such as this? For example firing the rifle after one runs down 200 metres at the shooting range? One has to force himself to stay steady, compose himself and control his breath so that his breathing doesn't cause his rounds to fly all over the place.

    If the ICE agent had really been struck by the car, he would not have fired his shots so soon, and his shots would have been far more erratic than that.

    Replies: @Rich, @wojtek

    If he did, the momentum from a 5000 pound SUV would have sent him flying.

    These little chinese red trolls are getting more and more dumb by the minute.

    FYI, momentum is mass times velocity. Go back to school.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
    @wojtek



    FYI, momentum is mass times velocity. Go back to school.
     
    LOL, obviously you don't understand English as well as you think you do.

    The word momentum has been in use far longer than it has been used in the modern scientific sense.

    Your are like an idiot saying "a cuttlefish is not a fish. A fish has scales and rayed-fins"

    This idiot can only understand the word "fish" from the modern scientific definition. He doesn't realise that for centuries prior, the word fish meant "an animal that lives in the water". That is why you have shellfish, starfish, jellyfish etc.

    Your schooling has obviously not been completed yet, dumb Polack.
  • @Anonymous
    @Ron Unz


    The one you highlight appears to show that the car hit the ICE agent, which seems rather implausible since he afterwards showed not the slightest sign of any physical injury. But because of the positioning of the camera, what actually happened is far from clear.
     
    Hmm…

    ICE agent who shot Renee Good suffered internal bleeding, officials say

    By Nicole Sganga, Jennifer Jacobs
    Updated on: January 14, 2026

    The Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent who fatally shot Renee Good last week in Minneapolis, Jonathan Ross, suffered internal bleeding to the torso following the incident, according to two U.S. officials briefed on his medical condition…

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ice-officer-who-shot-renee-good-internal-injuries-sources-say/

     

    Wait, we need a second opinion! Please forward those CT scans to our resident armchair biomechanical/accident reconstruction expert to examine… from his armchair!


    https://static01.nyt.com/images/2016/01/14/us/15harvard-web1/15harvard-web1-superJumbo.jpg

     

    Replies: @Antiwar7, @Truth Vigilante, @Ron Unz

    ICE agent who shot Renee Good suffered internal bleeding, officials say

    What ‘officials’ said that?
    Oh, you mean the same officials in the U.S Health bureaucracy that said the Covid vaxxes were ‘safe and effective’?
    Or was it the same bunch of officials that said, in the aftermath of the 9/11 False Flag, that WTC7’s demise was due to ‘office fires’?
    (Even though it was not impacted by a plane).

    The reality is that Building 7 had experienced negligible damage due to falling debris from WTC 1 & 2. It had the most minor of fires on floors 12 and 13 (which extinguished on their own after a short duration),.
    Yet it collapsed in what was clearly a textbook perfect example of controlled demolition on the day of 9/11?

    Donald Chump’s Gubmint and conscience-free goons will conjure up whatever falsehood was necessary to cover for this cold-blooded murder.
    Soon enough they’ll say this ICE agent is afflicted with PTSD, that he also got bone spurs and toe nail nail fungus from the incident, and that he’s suffering terribly.
    (esp. from the taunts he endures when wearing Open Toe sandals in public).

    And soon thereafter they’ll set up a GoFundMe platform to raise money for the poor dear.

    Nony-mouse, you’re a dupe if you believe what any U.S Gubmint administration (esp. Donald Chump’s clearly unhinged administration and its various agencies), are telling you about ANYTHING.

  • @pc
    @ghali


    Is Trump really different from his predecessors? Did George W. respect any laws, including the UN Charter? Bush was worse than Trump. Bush is a mass murderer. The war on terror and the criminal invasion of Iraq were history’s most barbaric crimes. Before Bush, there was Bill Clinton, who was a monstrous criminal. The deliberate murder of over 600,000 Iraqi children under the age of five years was Clinton’s trademark of mass murder. Clinton bombed Iraq almost weekly for eight years. His Secretary of State, the Jew Madeleine Albright, called it a “price worth it.” Every American president repeated the same mantra: “America is exceptional” and needs no law. If there is any justice, every American president should be in prison for committing heinous war crimes. Trump is no different.

     

    IMHO, this comment makes Mr. Unz's article and analysis irrelevant.

    As for the incident involving the lesbian woman and the ICE butcher, it is symptomatic of the malaise afflicting the degenerate American society. A society running completely foul of God's laws and commandments. A society steeped in decadence and in a materialistic abyss. History is replete with events describing God's destruction of such societies.

    Trump, Bush, Clinton, Roosevelt etc. do not arise in a vacuum; they are *products* of the American society. The society at large cannot absolve itself of the conduct of its leadership.

    As for the small minority of righteous Americans who abhor the ways of the majority and the leadership reflective of that majority, they have two choices: if the situation is hopeless, they distance themselves from this society and leave; or, if they think they can make a difference and bring the rest of America to its senses, then they fight awaiting one of two outcomes: martyrdom or victory.

    Peace

    Replies: @ghali

    Agree! Well said. It takes time and efforts to produce a “product”, any product.

  • @Joe Webb
    Trumpstein just announced his personal morality to be superior to any moral code in existence.

    He is a tyrant, and has just bragged about it.

    Replies: @Trinity, @Harold Smith

    In a sense, the MFOB is proclaiming itself to be a “god”: the creature publicly claims to reign over the whole world (gods aren’t limited by geography); it exercises the power of life and death over many people; it can and does reward people with whom it finds favor while its enemies experience its wrath; it can apparently do whatever it wants, limited only by its own moral compunction (of which it has none); it seeks and (according to itself) deserves constant “worship”; it “creates” (or at least wants its name on everything), and it demands unquestioning faith from its disciples, etc.

  • Anonymous[941] • Disclaimer says:

    A few days ago, a far deadlier ICE incident involving the death of a native-born American citizen reached the national headlines.

    Large numbers of ICE agents had been deployed to Minneapolis, arousing strong opposition from local liberal activists, one of them being a blond 37-year-old mother of three.

    For many generations, white, middle-class Americans have been raised lacking any serious fear of the police. That was certainly the case with the victim as she sat in her parked SUV on the suburban streets of her own city, serving as a legal observer responsible for providing advice to any demonstrators who might be arrested. Some video clips show her treating the nearby ICE troopers with lighthearted scorn, casually ridiculing their activities, which surely must have enraged those militarized federal officers clad in tactical gear.

    The rough sequence of events is clear. She was approached by several of those masked, armed ICE agents who tried to pull her out of her vehicle, so she apparently became alarmed and decided to drive away. This in turn seems to have alarmed one of those ICE agents, who shot her three times in the head, killing her. A few moments earlier, her last words to that ICE officer had been “I ain’t mad at you, dude,” while after firing the fatal shots he can be heard to say “Fucking bitch.”

    Do you really expect me to feel bad about some dumb roastie getting domed for physically putting herself in between federal law enforcement and the deportation of Somalian career criminals?

    • Replies: @nokangaroos
    @Anonymous

    The pass-for-white psycho dyke obstructing justice is a metaphor:
    The sense of impunity they cannot lose will be the downfall of all Americans.

  • @littlereddot
    @Rich


    Look, the video shows him being struck by the car.
     
    LOL.

    A friend of mine was convicted of assault on a police officer some years back. Do you know what she did?

    She was stopped by a police woman for a minor violation like not wearing a seat belt. After being handed a written citation, my friend crushed the citation and threw it out the window, while muttering something like "You guys have nothing better to do. Go catch some speeding car or some robbers, but instead you catch an old lady for not wearing a seatbelt". Maybe the balled up citation touched the police woman. But she in court she testified that the ball of paper hit her and caused her injury.

    It is clear that the only thing damaged in the encounter was the policewoman's ego for not being shown sufficient deference.

    My friend was lucky she was stopped by ICE agents. She would have been shot for sure.

    Replies: @Same old same old

    I have had my own encounters with the badged thugs roaming our streets. I suppose it is beyond the typical maggot that most people don’t want to live in a country where they have to kiss the asses of public servants or risk being shot in the face.

    Why were we supposed to be better than China or the USSR again?

    • Agree: littlereddot
  • @Rurik
    @Truth Vigilante

    Hey TruthV,

    I'm aware of all you say about David Irving. I used to visit his website often, back when he had that roguish looking guy, and spoke so often about the 'traditional enemies of free speech. I followed the trial, where Stephan Spielberg and other wealthy Jews poured millions into it, to effect the outcome, (which they did). I remember how in contempt and mockery, he refereed to the judge as "Mein Fuhrer". That was classic.

    On a side note, I also used to visit the site of another guy back in the day; John 'the Birdman' Bryant, [RIP]

    https://www.big-lies.org/jews/bryant-case-against-jews-mensa.html

    And way back when, he and David Irving had a tiff. It was minor, I merely bring it up because it was part of what I was reading back then, and it gives me a chance to cite Bryant, who was a Mesa guy, and also a brave soul, two things that rarely go together.

    I don't blame these people, like Irving or Ventura, (and God knows how many thousands of others), when they temper their language, to protect their families. I also saw when Jessie was speaking the truth on Fox, when that ninny got all huffy. I too had great admiration for Ventura back then. I didn't like when he took the ten million shekels, to stop speaking the truth, but at least he admitted what he did, so at least there was that.

    But now, TruthV, now he is going full-blown ZOG in his campaign to reenter the halls of ZOG power. There is a simmering war going on between ZOG and the Old School, anti-war, anti-intervention, and conservative values America - like no more ZOG wars. Kind of a continuation of the war between Pat Buchanan vs. the neocons, (David Frum, et al) who now also have all the forces of woke on their side.

    The battle lines on that war were Jan 6th, a short time ago, when ZOG was claiming all those protesters were all treasonous insurrectionists, attempting a violent overthrow of our Republic.

    Today, the battle line is immigration, and 'Is every single person on the planet, a de-facto American citizen'. Or, at least, all the non-white ones, (white Australians or Germans or the Irish, would not be allowed to just walk in and demand gibs), but according to Ventura, every illegal immigrant in the U.S., is automatically an American citizen, entitled to Constitutional protections. This is not only stupid, it's treason. When you give an invading army, (not a few people, but tens of millions), material comfort and support.

    He knows what he's doing, TruthV. He's aligning with ZOG, in it's war with the last gasps of conservative America, whose values are the Constitution, (just as Ron Paul has heroically defended), in order to bolster Ventura's own, personal ambitions. And that makes me sick, because like you, I used to admire the guy.

    If David Irving came out and said he was wrong all along about WWII, and that it was the Germans who were evil, who started it all, because they were full of hate for all others, and also, that in Gaza, the victims, the Israels, are only trying to defend themselves' from Arab terrorists'..

    ..would you still have respect for David Irving?

    Because that's how I see Ventura's antics now. It's shameless pandering to ZOG-left, with disgusting lies about Jan 6th, and illegal invaders. He's throwing gasoline on the immigration issue, for his own ambitions.

    The reason we all used to like him, is because he was independent, and hated both the Republicans and the Democrats. He used to be his own man, and now he's morphed into a Liz Cheney clone, in a blatant attempt at returning to ZOG's good graces, and person power.

    Replies: @Truth Vigilante

    David Irving has done so much good, he’s exhibited so much courage and sacrificed so much in pursuit of the truth (in other words he’s built up such a colossal reservoir of good deeds), that I’d pretty much forgive him no matter what he said.
    I’d also factor in that he’s an old man who isn’t capable of much resistance in his present condition*.

    (* I read recently that his health had turned for the worse and I fear he may not be with us for too much longer).

    As for Jesse Ventura, I was aware of one or two things he’s done in recent times that left me shaking my head and thinking to myself:
    ‘They’ve gotten to him and that he’s succumbed to (((their))) threats/intimidation’.
    But I wasn’t aware of those things you mentioned about him. Thanks for updating me.

  • One of the most flawlessly executed special forces operations of the last half-century took place in 1979 when Soviet commandos stormed Afghanistan's heavily defended presidential palace, killing Hafizullah Amin and several of his top aides. This allowed Moscow to install a replacement government much more congenial to its interests, though the result was the long...
  • @QCIC
    @John Johnson

    Stop kidding around. The US satellites give real time intel on Russian air defenses for major targets so the drones can avoid these or spoof them. US satellites are much better at this than European ones.

    Having our Congress make a fuss over this entirely US-created Ukraine disaster would be enormously helpful by moving the needle of public opinion. That is why we say, "Write your Congressman!". It sometimes helps, but not always. Maybe if someone really wants to die in a fire you can't talk them out of it, but it is still worth trying. Especially if they are trying to take your family and friends with them.

    Replies: @Been_there_done_that, @John Johnson

    Stop kidding around. The US satellites give real time intel on Russian air defenses for major targets so the drones can avoid these or spoof them. US satellites are much better at this than European ones.

    You are speculating on what is provided by US satellites. Such capabilities are not known to the public.

    What we do know is that:
    1. Russian oil refinery locations are public information
    2. The Russians are on video trying to defend the refineries with small arms fire

    I can provide the video if you would like. The Russians are on video multiple times where they fill the air with small arms fire. That is much less advanced than the German flak cannons of WW2 as they were firing based on complex calculations.

    If the Russians are shooting AK-47s at slow moving Ukrainian drones then there is no reason to assume that some US technology is required to attack the refineries.

    I’m not being silly. Like other Russian sympathizers you are in denial of where Russia is at in the war. They do not have enough S-400s to defend all of their refineries. Ukraine continues to launch sorties using a combination of Migs and Western missiles. Funny a certain alt-right blogger at Unz told us that the Russia has total air superiority.

    I guess not.

    Having our Congress make a fuss over this entirely US-created Ukraine disaster would be enormously helpful by moving the needle of public opinion. That is why we say, “Write your Congressman!”.

    Well the UN voted 143-5 that Russia is at fault and that 5 includes Russia, Belarus and North Korea.

    Congress passed military aid under Biden and most of it has been sent. Ending the remaining aid would not end the war. Europe can fund Ukraine for two more years.

    • Replies: @nokangaroos
    @John Johnson

    If the "Europeans" were in any way shape or form European they´d grok the
    keeheefjews are bombing them, at the behest of the Great Satan, and stomp
    them out instead of offering Greenland (and Iceland; and ...).

  • Back when I was a young child, I used to enjoy watching my Saturday morning cartoons, and they were often quite amusing. More decades have passed than I'd like to consider and my memories are garbled, but I recall that those cartoons occasionally featured a character called something like Ugh the Cave-Man. Ugh was always...
  • @Joe Webb
    Trumpstein just announced his personal morality to be superior to any moral code in existence.

    He is a tyrant, and has just bragged about it.

    Replies: @Trinity, @Harold Smith

    Oh yeah we heard about his morality.

    THE EPSTEIN FILES

  • Back when I was in college, more years ago than I'd like to consider, one of my majors was Classical History, and I did quite a lot of original research in that field. Then after I graduated and began my doctoral studies in Theoretical Physics, I took a little time to write up some of...
  • @littlereddot
    @wojtek


    Taiwan
     
    Do you mean the Republic of China?

    Yes, I think we should do this
     
    Thats not a bad idea.

    China would lose 0.4% of its territory
    Poland would lose 30% of its territory when it gives back the German territories of Pomerania, Silesia, East Prussia etc etc.

    Yeah, lets do it.

    Replies: @wojtek

    You’re worrying way too much about Germanistan – I think you’re the only one 🙂

    Focus on giving back Taiwan to the Japanese.
    New Republic of Formosa.

    Judging from the poor propaganda, I am starting to wonder if Chinese communism is as efficient as the Soviet one was. I’m curious if the new Japanese prime minister will test it. She seems to have balls.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
    @wojtek


    New Republic of Formosa.
     
    Sorry to burst your bubble. Republic of China is hard written into their constitution.

    https://newbloommag.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Taiwan_ROC_Passport-1.jpg
  • One of the most flawlessly executed special forces operations of the last half-century took place in 1979 when Soviet commandos stormed Afghanistan's heavily defended presidential palace, killing Hafizullah Amin and several of his top aides. This allowed Moscow to install a replacement government much more congenial to its interests, though the result was the long...
  • @littlereddot
    @Eugene Kusmiak


    Soviet Union
     
    If you ask an Indian what Pakistan is really like, you will not get an accurate picture.

    If you ask an North Korean what South Korea is really like, you will not get an accurate picture.

    If you ask an American what the USSR was really like, you will not get an accurate picture.

    Replies: @wojtek

    Don’t you worry little red troll, the only shortcoming of his description of the USSR is that people might think it was somewhat funny. It wasn’t. Everything else is spot on.

    • Replies: @j2
    @wojtek

    Yes, but on the other hand, there were much more jokes in those days. The whole Poland was a joke (at least for a Western tourist) with those tiny cars and money exchangers catching you already on the airport.

    Replies: @wojtek

    , @littlereddot
    @wojtek


    Don’t you worry little red troll, the only shortcoming of his description of the USSR is that people might think it was somewhat funny. It wasn’t. Everything else is spot on.
     
    You are right. Poland is far funnier than the USSR.

    ~64
    Q: How do you know you're flying over Poland?
    A: Toilet paper hanging on the clotheslines.

    Replies: @wojtek

  • Back when I was a young child, I used to enjoy watching my Saturday morning cartoons, and they were often quite amusing. More decades have passed than I'd like to consider and my memories are garbled, but I recall that those cartoons occasionally featured a character called something like Ugh the Cave-Man. Ugh was always...
  • @Rich
    @littlereddot

    Look, the video shows him being struck by the car. If that's not enough for you guys, nothing is. You just want, or need, to believe that this woman was killed in cold blood. I'm sure you were all-in on hands up, knee on neck, out getting skittles, too. If you can't see the agent getting hit in the video, there's just nothing else to argue about. You live in an alternate reality.

    Replies: @Rurik, @littlereddot, @Joe Levantine

    Look, the video shows him being struck by the car.

    LOL.

    A friend of mine was convicted of assault on a police officer some years back. Do you know what she did?

    She was stopped by a police woman for a minor violation like not wearing a seat belt. After being handed a written citation, my friend crushed the citation and threw it out the window, while muttering something like “You guys have nothing better to do. Go catch some speeding car or some robbers, but instead you catch an old lady for not wearing a seatbelt”. Maybe the balled up citation touched the police woman. But she in court she testified that the ball of paper hit her and caused her injury.

    It is clear that the only thing damaged in the encounter was the policewoman’s ego for not being shown sufficient deference.

    My friend was lucky she was stopped by ICE agents. She would have been shot for sure.

    • Disagree: Rich
    • Thanks: muh muh, Same old same old
    • Replies: @Same old same old
    @littlereddot

    I have had my own encounters with the badged thugs roaming our streets. I suppose it is beyond the typical maggot that most people don't want to live in a country where they have to kiss the asses of public servants or risk being shot in the face.

    Why were we supposed to be better than China or the USSR again?

  • Was Israel involved in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy? (Is there any hard evidence or is it mostly conjecture?). And if Israel was involved, then what was the alleged motive? Ron Unz---Although there exists no smoking gun proof implicating Israel and its Mossad in the JFK Assassination, there is an enormous mass of...
  • The Last Jewish Gangster – Patrick Bet-David 2021

    Myron Sugerman Discusses Jack Ruby’s Jewish Mafia Days, the JFK Assassination, and the Jewish Mafia’s Support of Israel

    Video Link

    He fully confirms that Jack Ruby was a Jewish mobster, and he mentions Tibor Rosenbaum as well.

    Myron Sugerman is like a walking advertisement for Michael Collins Piper’s book.

  • Back when I was a young child, I used to enjoy watching my Saturday morning cartoons, and they were often quite amusing. More decades have passed than I'd like to consider and my memories are garbled, but I recall that those cartoons occasionally featured a character called something like Ugh the Cave-Man. Ugh was always...
  • @Greg Garros
    @Lawrence Erickson


    Yeah, I don’t think I’ve seen a single take on this that didn’t align with the person’s preexisting views on ICE, mine included.
     
    ^I think that's probably the truest thing that's been said in this entire thread of comments and in the larger national media discussion.

    It seems like everyone is using this particular ICE killing as a proxy for a larger discussion about ICE's right to exist and perform its basic function of detaining "illegal aliens" (foreigners here unlawfully), and whether we should have a border etc. It's devolving back to the 2017-18 "kids in cages!" level of discussion. It's George Floyd 2.0.

    I think Trump is a disaster, but there's no evidence that this incident is anything other than ICE performing its legal duties ---> ICE meets obstructionists/organized provocateurs ---> Provocateurs go overboard. ---> rogue ICE agent apparently goes overboard in response, resulting in tragedy.

    These tragedies happen with local, state, and sometimes federal law enforcement on occasion, especially when people do what you describe:

    If you don’t want to risk your life, then don’t fuck with the police. Don’t insert yourself in a law enforcement situation
     
    It's a generally rare thing, and a case-by-case thing. I assume Renee Good's estate will have the right to sue ICE here, and they will probably win a few million bucks.

    I haven't heard one person say that the detainments those ICE officers were trying to carry out were illegal or outside the scope of ICE's duties.


    Also - Oversight and control of ICE was transferred to the Dept of Homeland Security (DHS) in 2003 (after 9/11). If this incident is going to trigger a larger discussion about whether ICE should exist, some discussion of its origin is warranted, but I'm seeing none of that.

    I’m more concerned about having no immigration enforcement than I am about the remote possibility that it could be turned against Americans.
     
    ^Another good point.

    Trump ran 3 times on solving this immigration issue and its the only reason he ever became President. Arguably the only federal agency that deserved to have its budget increased is ICE. An increase is ICE agents and an increase in immigration judges to deal with the cases is a commensurate response to the size of the immigration problem that exists.

    But of course, like everything, the Israel-loyalists tend to hijack these programs for their own purposes, so I'm willing to criticize ICE when it targets foreigners for wrong-think, like those college students and op-ed writers who were abducted for criticizing Israel. That's a separate issue. But these people harassing ICE couldn't make that distinction if you beat them over the head with it.

    Replies: @muh muh, @Truth Vigilante

    I think Trump is a disaster, but there’s no evidence that this incident is anything other than ICE performing its legal duties —> ICE meets obstructionists/organized provocateurs —> Provocateurs go overboard. —> rogue ICE agent apparently goes overboard in response, resulting in tragedy.

    That’s a grossly reductionist view of the matter.

    See the following post upthread:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/the-trump-doctrine-they-have-it-we-want-it-we-take-it/#comment-7457891

    That federal rule change has enabled ICE to engage in conduct that would otherwise be described as flagrantly unconstitutional. As such, I find any effort to depict the conduct of ICE as ‘just performing its legal duties’ to be misleading, at best.

    To be clear, I don’t encourage obstruction, yet Team Trump hasn’t done itself any favors by expanding police powers as they have, transforming erstwhile legally protected conduct into an arrestable offense. In so doing, they engender support for their opposition while seriously damaging their own.

  • @Greg Garros
    @Avery


    She was no felon.
     
    Doesn't appear she had any previous felony convictions.

    However, what she was doing (blocking ICE vehicles/officers with her car when they are trying to detain someone) appears to be a crime:

    1. Obstruction of Justice: Under federal law, obstructing an officer in the performance of their official duties is a serious offense. This includes actions such as physically blocking ICE agents, providing false information, or using intimidation to prevent an arrest. Depending on the circumstances, individuals could face misdemeanor or felony charges, leading to fines and potential jail time.
     
    https://www.birdsall-law.com/legal-implications-of-interfering-with-immigration-enforcement

    Replies: @Same old same old, @Ron Unz

    Being in a road an illegal federal militia wants to drive down is not a crime worthy of summary execution, you disgusting kike maggot.

    • Agree: Harold Smith
  • @Lawrence Erickson
    @Poupon Marx


    Why didn’t the officer jump out of the way?
     
    I meant this as a rhetorical question, I was agreeing with you that it's a silly thing to ask.

    I don't even think it matters much whether she meant to hit him or whether she did hit him. What matters is she forced him to make a split second decision by ramming an SUV in his face.

    I think what most likely happened is that she got an adrenaline rush after the butchdyke said "drive, baby, drive" and then pictured herself as some Marvel hero, bursting through the horde of faceless bad guys, probably with the musical score flourishing in the background. Too bad, she should have stayed home and watched Netflix instead.

    Replies: @Poupon Marx, @Greg Garros, @Pierre de Craon, @Same old same old

    I don’t even think it matters much whether she meant to hit him or whether she did hit him. What matters is she forced him to make a split second decision by ramming an SUV in his face.

    Weren’t you same ziokikes shouting “don’t stand in traffic” a few years ago? Fuck off, Hasbaras.

  • One of the most flawlessly executed special forces operations of the last half-century took place in 1979 when Soviet commandos stormed Afghanistan's heavily defended presidential palace, killing Hafizullah Amin and several of his top aides. This allowed Moscow to install a replacement government much more congenial to its interests, though the result was the long...
  • @Eugene Kusmiak
    @Eugene Kusmiak

    I should not have downplayed the economic difficulties that Russia had in the 1990s as much as I did in my comment. After living their whole lives under the system of “They pretend to pay us and we pretend to work”, I'm sure the post-Soviet economy came as a shock to most people. Private employers didn't pretend to pay people who pretended to work. This must have seemed like a betrayal of the whole "social contract", especially to the elderly who couldn't adapt to the new ways.

    And I'm sure the gulag jailers still miss the good old days.

    Old Soviet jokes:

    “How do you double the efficiency of a Soviet factory?”
    Answer: “Close it.”

    “Is it true that our workers are the most productive in the world?”
    Answer: “Yes. But what they produce is mostly shortages.”

    “What happens if socialism comes to the Sahara?”
    Answer: “A sand shortage.”

    “Why do Soviet cars have heated rear windows?”
    Answer: “To keep your hands warm while you push.”

    “Is it true that socialism will triumph when every worker has a car?”
    Answer: “Yes, but the car will be a police car, and it will be following him.”

    “Is it true that Rabinovich won a car in the lottery?”
    Answer: “Yes, but it was not a car, it was a bicycle. And he didn’t win it, he stole it.”

    “Is it true that the Soviet Union has the best medical care in the world?”
    Answer: “Yes, but unfortunately the patients are not as good.”

    “What’s the difference between capitalism and socialism?”
    Answer: “In capitalism, man exploits man. In socialism, it’s the other way around.”

    Replies: @Been_there_done_that, @littlereddot

    Soviet Union

    If you ask an Indian what Pakistan is really like, you will not get an accurate picture.

    If you ask an North Korean what South Korea is really like, you will not get an accurate picture.

    If you ask an American what the USSR was really like, you will not get an accurate picture.

    • Replies: @wojtek
    @littlereddot

    Don't you worry little red troll, the only shortcoming of his description of the USSR is that people might think it was somewhat funny. It wasn't. Everything else is spot on.

    Replies: @j2, @littlereddot

  • Back when I was a young child, I used to enjoy watching my Saturday morning cartoons, and they were often quite amusing. More decades have passed than I'd like to consider and my memories are garbled, but I recall that those cartoons occasionally featured a character called something like Ugh the Cave-Man. Ugh was always...
  • Trumpstein just announced his personal morality to be superior to any moral code in existence.

    He is a tyrant, and has just bragged about it.

    • Agree: Same old same old
    • Replies: @Trinity
    @Joe Webb

    Oh yeah we heard about his morality.


    THE EPSTEIN FILES

    , @Harold Smith
    @Joe Webb

    In a sense, the MFOB is proclaiming itself to be a "god": the creature publicly claims to reign over the whole world (gods aren't limited by geography); it exercises the power of life and death over many people; it can and does reward people with whom it finds favor while its enemies experience its wrath; it can apparently do whatever it wants, limited only by its own moral compunction (of which it has none); it seeks and (according to itself) deserves constant "worship"; it "creates" (or at least wants its name on everything), and it demands unquestioning faith from its disciples, etc.

  • Back when I was in college, more years ago than I'd like to consider, one of my majors was Classical History, and I did quite a lot of original research in that field. Then after I graduated and began my doctoral studies in Theoretical Physics, I took a little time to write up some of...
  • @Rich23
    @Harold Smith

    Please, no thank you.

    You gotta do better than barking in the wrong neighborhood.

    Obama took out the Chair, House Appropriations as in the guy who wrote the checks for the entire military industrial complex who also was a man principled enough to take a public stand against The War Crime called Haditha AND was in line to be the next Speaker of The House rather than his playmate Nancy Pelosi before Lockheed, QTC Inc, Obama and some rotten military surgeons had their way with Murtha’s bowel at Bethesda.
    Was Anthony Principi involved in that decision too?

    What person of that stature has your Orange Boogeyman targeted for disposal?

    Replies: @Harold Smith

    What person of that stature has your Orange Boogeyman targeted for disposal?

    Seriously?

    At issue here is the question of whether or not the monstrous fat orange bastard’s “outrageous and lawless things” can be deemed more “extreme” than the “outrageous and lawless things” done by his predecessors, and the contest isn’t even close: the fat orange bastard (i.e. trump) takes the prize. Obama was a piker compared to the MFOB.

    First of all the scope of the “outrageous and lawless things” that Ron was referring to clearly involves much more than just assassinating any particular person. But being that you asked the question: “What person of that stature has your Orange Boogeyman targeted for disposal?”
    Here’s an answer: The MFOB assassinated General Soleimani et al; was likely involved in an attempt to assassinate President Putin with drones; kidnapped Venezuelan President Maduro; and was no doubt an accomplice in the murders of top Iranian government personnel by the jews.

    In the bigger picture, the MFOB presided over the covid-19 scam and the covid “vaccine” bioattack which has caused or contributed to the deaths of millions; the MFOB repudiated the JCPOA agreement with Iran; the MFOB moved the u.s. embassy to Jerusalem; the MFOB successfully saved the effort to overthrow the Syrian government; the MFOB single-handedly trashed the framework of nuclear arms control and started an arm race that the u.s. can’t possibly win; the MFOB singlehandedly started a trade war which is destroying the economy and the value of the dollar; the MFOB has made enemies out of allies and neighbors and killed the tourist industry; the MFOB is engaged in an obvious effort to turn the u.s. into a police state; and as I type this the MFOB seems to be continuing to bring the u.s. closer to a catastrophic WW3 with Russia, China and Iran than ever before. Let’s face it, the satanic MFOB is not only destroying the constitution, the rule of law and the dollar, but the creature’s continuing provocations are openly flirting with nuclear war and planetary extinction.

    There is simply no comparison. The fat orange bastard by its words, deeds and relentless pursuit of a hopeless and very dangerous agenda is clearly the most unhinged, most morally bankrupt and therefore most dangerous “president” in u.s. history.

    • Agree: Truth Vigilante
  • Back when I was a young child, I used to enjoy watching my Saturday morning cartoons, and they were often quite amusing. More decades have passed than I'd like to consider and my memories are garbled, but I recall that those cartoons occasionally featured a character called something like Ugh the Cave-Man. Ugh was always...
  • @Avery
    @Rich


    It is settled law that a sworn law enforcement officer can shoot at a suspect fleeing in a vehicle.
     
    If you would provide some references from law journals, case law and such.
    You -- and you alone -- making that assertion doesn't cut it.
    Even if you were an attorney.

    Here are some references that contradict your assertion:

    1) https://www.justice.gov/jm/1-16000-department-justice-policy-use-force#1-16.200


    Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles. Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle
     
    Agent deliberately moved in front of the vehicle to block it: completely reckless.

    2) https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/shooting-fleeing-felon-state-law

    UNDER TRADITIONAL RULE, FATAL SHOOTINGS BY POLICE OFFICERS OF SUSPECTED FELONS WHO ARE FLEEING FROM ARREST GENERALLY HAVE BEEN HELD PRIVILEGED AND THUS NOT SUBJECT TO LEGAL SANCTION
     
    Suspected felons only.
    She was no felon.

    3) https://verdict.justia.com/2026/01/09/the-legality-of-deadly-force-three-critical-questions-about-the-ice-shooting-in-minneapolis

    The legality of the ICE agent’s use of force in this case will likely turn on three specific facts: whether the agent made a reckless tactical decision by stepping in front of the vehicle, whether Ms. Good’s actions were reasonably perceived as presenting an imminent threat of death or great bodily harm to the agent or others, and whether the agent could have reasonably resolved any threat presented by the vehicle’s forward movement by stepping out of the way instead of shooting.

    (by Seth W. Stoughton is a Professor of Law at the University of South Carolina Joseph F. Rice School of Law, where he serves as the Faculty Director of the Excellence in Policing & Public Safety Program.)
     
    He could have easily stepped out of the way instead of opening fire.

    Both she and her lesbian lover
     
    You have read my posts for some time, as I have yours.
    You know quite well what my foundational beliefs are on such matters.
    But we are discussing the ICE agent's actions that led to killing a human being.
    Not the victim's lifestyle.

    We are not like "them", but unchecked power will eventually get to people like you and I.

    "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely" Lord Acton

    Replies: @Rich, @Punch Brother Punch, @Punch Brother Punch, @Greg Garros

    She was no felon.

    Doesn’t appear she had any previous felony convictions.

    However, what she was doing (blocking ICE vehicles/officers with her car when they are trying to detain someone) appears to be a crime:

    1. Obstruction of Justice: Under federal law, obstructing an officer in the performance of their official duties is a serious offense. This includes actions such as physically blocking ICE agents, providing false information, or using intimidation to prevent an arrest. Depending on the circumstances, individuals could face misdemeanor or felony charges, leading to fines and potential jail time.

    https://www.birdsall-law.com/legal-implications-of-interfering-with-immigration-enforcement

    • Replies: @Same old same old
    @Greg Garros

    Being in a road an illegal federal militia wants to drive down is not a crime worthy of summary execution, you disgusting kike maggot.

    , @Ron Unz
    @Greg Garros


    However, what she was doing (blocking ICE vehicles/officers with her car when they are trying to detain someone) appears to be a crime:
     
    I really haven't followed the details of the case, but is that correct? Wasn't she "a legal observer," intending to provide advice to protestors who might be arrested? From the videos, it's not clear to me that she was actually blocking anything where she was parked.
  • @Poupon Marx
    @Harold Smith

    Thank you so much for proving my point as a stylist of the Kamala Harris School of Communication disciple. You are in need of a realistic appraisal of your banality and disjointed thoughts.

    Of course I see you as a mediocre thinker but also a product of modern public schools, and developmental immaturity. Are you paying mom for occupying her house in your adulthood?

    Replies: @Harold Smith

    Thank you so much for proving my point as a stylist of the Kamala Harris School of Communication disciple.

    You don’t need to thank me. Yes, you certainly could be described as a “stylist of the Kamala Harris School of Communication disciple” or something like that, but you didn’t need me to expose this notable characteristic of yours, knucklehead, as your irrelevant, childishly incoherent verbal vomit clearly speaks for itself.

    You are in need of a realistic appraisal of your banality and disjointed thoughts.

    Perhaps, but both the “realistic” qualification and your embarrassing, relatively far more disjointed “thoughts” would obviously make such an endeavor completely out of reach and irrelevant to you chump.

    Of course I see you as a mediocre thinker but also a product of modern public schools, and developmental immaturity.

    Well you’re supposed to be looking at your monitor, not your mirror, as you type your infantile drivel, you silly retard.

    Are you paying mom for occupying her house in your adulthood?

    I don’t see how the question is at all relevant to this “discussion” but being that you’ve broached the subject, I’ll say that right now I’m paying a rather high rent to a unrelated landlord. Unfortunately, not all of us have the ability to live rent free inside our own rectums the way you do, chumpy.

    • LOL: Poupon Marx
  • @Lawrence Erickson
    @Greg Garros


    Lots of accusations of the Right having Pavlovian reactions to the killing (perhaps they do in some cases), but the biggest Pavlovian dogs in this whole ICE affair are the Left-wing groups, who’ve reacted this way since 2016.
     
    Yeah, I don't think I've seen a single take on this that didn't align with the person's preexisting views on ICE, mine included. My view in these situations is always pretty much the same though. If you don't want to risk your life, then don't fuck with the police. Don't insert yourself in a law enforcement situation, don't resist arrest, and don't endanger officers with deadly weapons. Usually it's a black thug, but I don't have any more sympathy because it's a white woman. An SUV is an SUV, whether it's driven by LeBron James or Taylor Swift.

    That's interesting about those groups. Regardless of how involved they are, there are definitely many powerful people that are trying to totally neuter ICE. I think the question of whether to give ICE more powers in response is a difficult one. If those people succeed in obstructing ICE, it could encourage further waves of migrants and eliminate the incentive to self-deport for the ones already here. On the other side, there's Anglin's scenario that ICE could start rounding up American citizens for criticizing Israel. I tend to think Anglin's scenario is pretty unlikely. I recall that Anglin also predicted that Trump would use Charlie Kirk's death as a sort of Reichstag Fire to crack down on free speech. Never happened. That doesn't mean this one won't, but I've always tended to see Trump and his administration as far too incompetent to pull something like that off. Regardless, I don't see why he couldn't just use the FBI to arrest critics of Israel.

    Certainly, the best option would be to target the employers of illegals and institute e-verify. For whatever reason though, that's never happened. So ICE is what we've got, and I'm more concerned about having no immigration enforcement than I am about the remote possibility that it could be turned against Americans.

    Replies: @Greg Garros

    Yeah, I don’t think I’ve seen a single take on this that didn’t align with the person’s preexisting views on ICE, mine included.

    ^I think that’s probably the truest thing that’s been said in this entire thread of comments and in the larger national media discussion.

    It seems like everyone is using this particular ICE killing as a proxy for a larger discussion about ICE’s right to exist and perform its basic function of detaining “illegal aliens” (foreigners here unlawfully), and whether we should have a border etc. It’s devolving back to the 2017-18 “kids in cages!” level of discussion. It’s George Floyd 2.0.

    I think Trump is a disaster, but there’s no evidence that this incident is anything other than ICE performing its legal duties —> ICE meets obstructionists/organized provocateurs —> Provocateurs go overboard. —> rogue ICE agent apparently goes overboard in response, resulting in tragedy.

    These tragedies happen with local, state, and sometimes federal law enforcement on occasion, especially when people do what you describe:

    If you don’t want to risk your life, then don’t fuck with the police. Don’t insert yourself in a law enforcement situation

    It’s a generally rare thing, and a case-by-case thing. I assume Renee Good’s estate will have the right to sue ICE here, and they will probably win a few million bucks.

    I haven’t heard one person say that the detainments those ICE officers were trying to carry out were illegal or outside the scope of ICE’s duties.

    Also – Oversight and control of ICE was transferred to the Dept of Homeland Security (DHS) in 2003 (after 9/11). If this incident is going to trigger a larger discussion about whether ICE should exist, some discussion of its origin is warranted, but I’m seeing none of that.

    I’m more concerned about having no immigration enforcement than I am about the remote possibility that it could be turned against Americans.

    ^Another good point.

    Trump ran 3 times on solving this immigration issue and its the only reason he ever became President. Arguably the only federal agency that deserved to have its budget increased is ICE. An increase is ICE agents and an increase in immigration judges to deal with the cases is a commensurate response to the size of the immigration problem that exists.

    But of course, like everything, the Israel-loyalists tend to hijack these programs for their own purposes, so I’m willing to criticize ICE when it targets foreigners for wrong-think, like those college students and op-ed writers who were abducted for criticizing Israel. That’s a separate issue. But these people harassing ICE couldn’t make that distinction if you beat them over the head with it.

    • Replies: @muh muh
    @Greg Garros


    I think Trump is a disaster, but there’s no evidence that this incident is anything other than ICE performing its legal duties —> ICE meets obstructionists/organized provocateurs —> Provocateurs go overboard. —> rogue ICE agent apparently goes overboard in response, resulting in tragedy.
     
    That's a grossly reductionist view of the matter.

    See the following post upthread:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/the-trump-doctrine-they-have-it-we-want-it-we-take-it/#comment-7457891

    That federal rule change has enabled ICE to engage in conduct that would otherwise be described as flagrantly unconstitutional. As such, I find any effort to depict the conduct of ICE as 'just performing its legal duties' to be misleading, at best.

    To be clear, I don't encourage obstruction, yet Team Trump hasn't done itself any favors by expanding police powers as they have, transforming erstwhile legally protected conduct into an arrestable offense. In so doing, they engender support for their opposition while seriously damaging their own.

    , @Truth Vigilante
    @Greg Garros


    Trump ran 3 times on solving this immigration issue and its the only reason he ever became President.
     
    Well .... NO .... in fact. That was a peripheral issue for many voters.
    While campaigning in 2016, Donald Chump said:

    1) That he'd appoint a Special Prosecutor immediately upon becoming Prez, to investigate Hillary.

    2) That he'd look into 9/11 and tell is 'who really did it' (and release the entirety of the JFK files).

    3) That he'd sit down with Putin and try to negotiate with him, to deescalate the tensions.

    4) That he'd stop with the 'stupid wars'

    5) That he'd build a wall on the southern border and get the Mexicans to pay for it.
    And ... much more.

    Well then Mr Garrulous, how did all that work out?
    The Orange baboon did not keep a single promise.

    Meanwhile, if I was eligible to vote in U.S elections and was inclined to vote, my NUMBER ONE reason for voting for Donald Chump would be for his pledge to REINVESTIGATE 9/11.
    Because, as Christopher Bollyn says:

    SOLVING 9/11 ENDS THE WARS.
     
    Did you comprehend that Greg Garrulous?
    Solving 9/11 entails:

    i) Releasing all the evidence that clearly demonstrates ZOG involvement.
    (ie: the Apartheid Israeli state's Mossad and all the domestic traitors in the U.S Gubmint/Military/Intel agencies that aided and abetted the orchestration of this False Flag).

    ii) Thereafter, these Talmudic misfits are to be rounded up, prosecuted, incarcerated and then hung, drawn and quartered.
    (Not necessarily in that order - since the trial can always be conducted posthumously).

    Bottom Line: Once the perpetrators of the 9/11 False Flag are out of the way (ie: the core structure of ZOG), we NO LONGER NEED TO WORRY about the immigration issue, chronic inflation (caused by the ZOG owned Federal Reserve), the need for having and funding over 900 bases in 130 countries, the funding for the bloated MISSS - Military Industrial Security Surveillance State - or pretty much anything else.

    It was this cartel of Talmudic financiers that controlled the entirety of the western financial and political systems, THEY were behind all of America's (and the world's) ailments.
    With ZOG cleansed from the system, THE WHOLE WORLD RETURNS TO NORMAL.
     
    So Greg Garrulous, you have your priorities all wrong.
    When shape shifting reptilians rule over you, one must CUT OFF THE HEAD OF THE SNAKE.
    Doing anything else is just applying a band-aid to a severed Carotid artery.
    (That's the artery Charlie Kirk bled to death from - the artery severed by the Jewish miscreants).
  • @Eustace Tilley (not)
    @muh muh

    And I thank you.

    America now, in my "guesstimation", will be seen by Historians of the Future to be in a similar situation as it was in the 1850s: very evenly divided, increasingly passionately divided, increasingly self-righteously divided by A Big Issue.

    🛑 Red Man: With automation and AI on the horizon, with the nation in $38 trillion debt, with China and perhaps India gathering steam as rising industrial powers, with a large indigenous parasite class demanding federal largesse, is it good for 👉Americans👈 to be opening their borders to a possibly unlimited number of aliens of unknown skill levels and criminal backgrounds who will be competing, with a DEI wind at their backs, against our grandchildren for college admissions and jobs?

    🌐 Blue Man: We imagine there's no country (I wonder if you can?), nothing to kill or die for: a Brotherhood of Man. We imagine all the people sharing all the Earth. Greedy White Europeans stole this continent by force; by what right, then, can they call it "theirs"? Oh, my Christian heart! How it aches for the poor of the Third World! What right have right-wing racist 👉 Americans 👈 to keep this land unto themselves?

    Both sides are pushing harder and harder. Some on the right are gritting their teeth, accepting that we must indeed embrace "fascism" if that's what it takes to prevail in this life-or-death struggle for their families, their culture, and their future. They would prefer to keep their decaying Republic and its fading and tattered Constitution if possible, but willing to discard them with regret if necessary. Regimes and ideologies come and go; Blut und Boden abide. The Americans may have to overthrow the fascist regime of their own creation in a century two. But it will still be a recognizable America. If the left wins, their America shall be forever lost.

    The left is following the playbook of the One-Worldists. They lack cultural roots; they lack historical knowledge. They complain that Trump is "shredding the Constitution" although they've never actually read it and perhaps could not read it if their college professor asked them to. They are "full of passionate intensity", in Yeats' phrase.

    Of course the anti-ICE activists are spoiling for a fight. Of course they seek confrontation, and even escalation of confrontation. They are sure that they're "the Good Guys", and, most delightfully of all, are "making history". They are breaking the King's law and having fun (the fun of self-righteousness) doing it. They missed their parents' Sixties, but this is even better!

    Blue is Blue, and Red is Red, and never the twain shall meet /
    But glare across the battle lines on Minnesota street. /
    "Happy the land", a wise man said, "that has no history". /
    We've just begun to count the dead in The Land of Brave and Free.

    Replies: @muh muh

    Thank you again.

    IMO, we need to transcend the political dichotomy to see matters clearly. Blood and soil abide only insofar as the will to preserve them exist. Ideology is the decisive factor determining whether that will persists or not. As such, ideology makes all the difference, not blood and soil alone. Fickle as our species may be, it remains incumbent upon us to labor for preservation of that ideology most beneficial to our survival and well being.

    As it stands, our nation is divided roughly in half on the matter of deportation, yet in recent months, there has been a precipitous decline in support for the methods now implemented by ICE. There’s even noteworthy dissent on the right. In the short term, it looks as if the bad optics of it are likely to cost Team Trump in the coming midterms.

    So it’s improbable that the current push for mass deportation, with all of its attendant unconstitutionality, will result in much more than a slight decrease in illegal immigration while inflaming racial and political tensions domestically. However successful, it certainly will do nothing to forestall the inevitable demographic change brought about by remaining people of color, as white birth rates are nowhere near replacement level and there’s very little indication this is going to improve in the near future.

    As such, the notion of dispensing with constitutional law in order to salvage a semblance of it in generations to come appears to be little more than a far-flung flight of fancy. If you believe that law is a product of racial ingenuity, well… you just won’t have the requisite numbers to revive it.

    I realize this won’t convince those who believe constitutional law depends on white folk to survive, but abiding by it is certainly a more effective means of persuading people it’s worth preserving than encouraging the jackboot thuggery of Team Trump on a promise you can never keep.

    If you agree with Pierre’s assessment of the situation, this shouldn’t be too hard to apprehend.

    • Replies: @Eustace Tilley (not)
    @muh muh

    Thanks once more returned.

    I feel like Dante as he and Virgil spiral downward on their tour if the Inferno. I feel increasingly disconnected from the public Clown Show that calls itself "American politics". I see Trump, held down by demons as molten gold is poured down his throat.

    I shrink back in horror: "O, woeful sight! What can be the extent of this man's crimes?" Virgil: "Posing as a champion of the people, he attained the highest office only to become the vassal of a foreign prince, all in return for gold."

    He deserves to be thrown out of office. Of course, the Democrats will then resume their project of destroying the country, all with the usual "good intentions" of the clueless reformer.

  • @Pierre de Craon
    @Poupon Marx


    … different perspectives on one Adolph Coors Hitler.
     
    I'm laughing so hard I can barely type.

    I drank quite a lot of beer till about the age of forty—I'm not sure that I've even had a sip of the stuff since then, however—and Coors was my favorite domestic brew. I recall how astonished I was to learn in the late seventies that "good" people eschewed the company's beers and ales on principle. I had enough courage to defy the accepted wisdom, however, and continued drinking the stuff at my local watering hole. On the other hand, I was never able to muster the resolution needed to kill the leftists who told me I shouldn't be drinking Coors.

    I guess I just didn't have what it takes to qualify for employment as an armed, armored, and masked ICE enforcer.

    Replies: @Poupon Marx

    Thanks, Pierre. Any humor we can garner in this age we like in are precious, indeed. You have, over the years, provided me with many chuckles and chortles, inveighing against self-deception, inflated cognitive deficits in the commentariat.

    Hopefully, we have in some cases, been successful in spurring spurious mind to return to the sources of knowledge and formulate better and more complete thoughts.

  • @Trinity
    Doing odd jobs in my life especially in my younger years I often had to work with Mexicans. Now these senors and senoritas would be in their 50’s and 60’s now.To be honest I never had a problem with THESE amigos and amigoettes, what would be old skoo Mexicans now. The Mexican and I worked the pit shoveling leaves, branches, and mud that dropped off a line carrying tree ripened oranges at a juice plant in Polk County, Florida. Walk up the tractor trailers and hose them down. I loved it, kept me active and the Mexican was a funny dude. Always had a pint or two of J&B scotch hidden to help us have a few laughs. Watch going down that slippery trailer with the hose, however. Anyhow the Mexican told me he was getting on a bus in Chicago, and he mistook a Native for an Hispanic and talked to her in Spanish,he said she cussed him out. lol. I don’t think Native Americans have any love for Mexicans even though they are distant relatives. I often wore an American flag bandana and the beaners called me Capitan, I guess after Captain America. I did find that Mexicans were quite generous at sharing their food, which was delicious, remember these are old skoo Mexicans not cholos.Nigra ain’t giving you shit.

    Replies: @Felpudinho

    I did find that Mexicans were quite generous at sharing their food, which was delicious, remember these are old skoo Mexicans not cholos. Nigra ain’t giving you shit.

    LOL And yeah, unlike Nigras, Mexicans are generous with their delicious food. It’s like my white buddy said, “They use the cheapest cut of meat and it’s always delicious.”

    The illegals (with false papers) I worked with in a salmon cannery in Alaska were cool to work with and it was was good for my Spanish working and talking side by side all day. They invited me to join them down in Washington state to pick apples but I got lucky and got myself a job as a deckhand on a purse seiner for the Ketchikan fall-fishing salmon season.

    As for that Captain America, American-flag bandana, my little brother used to wear one too. That was back in the late 70’s. Until you mentioned it, I had forgotten about it. LOL.

  • @JPS
    @Poupon Marx

    Since the riots are apparently mostly subdued, (it's been a few days now), RT makes an article about it on January 14. Pravda made a report on the 12th. It was impossible to find mention of the riots and US preparations for war against Iran on the Russian propaganda outlets I look for information on. After many years, the pattern is unmistakable.

    However, this introduces a key paradox: as soon as external involvement becomes apparent (through the involvement of the diaspora, propaganda, or political statements by Western officials), the protests lose legitimacy in the eyes of Iranians. That’s because they are seen not as an internal social process but as a tool of external pressure. In the context of prolonged sanctions and so-called “hybrid pressure,” this perception only intensifies.

    As a result, protests in Iran are caught in a bind: without external support, they fail to instigate significant political change, yet with too much outside backing, they risk losing their domestic appeal. This largely explains why the recent waves of protests, despite drawing international attention, have had only limited political impact.
     

    This is practically an endorsement of the riots, with no explanation of the mechanisms of covert action. There IS NOT explicit mention in this article of US and Israeli involvement. There's no mention of Trump's threats, no mention of US war preparations. One could almost argue that Russian coverage is MORE PRO-ZIONIST more PRO-TRUMP than American coverage!

    https://www.rt.com/news/630957-disorder-instead-of-protest-iran/

    Replies: @JPS, @Poupon Marx

    You’re obviously a poor chess player, and poker player. Transparent, and I don’t mean deep in thought or clear thinking. While you are confined to riding a donkey, Putin and Xi are streaking across the sky in stealth mode at hypersonic speed.

    Please retire to study and serious thought before writing in a public forum.

  • I don’t think we need to read anyone’s mind to see that the shooting was justified.

    “We”? Speak for yourself.

  • @Harold Smith
    @Poupon Marx


    I believe you will never improve yourself or your mind, which is a colloquial term for the Psyche and Ego, tempered by Archetypes, further than retro-actively searching in the dirt for supporting events to bolster your preening and virtue signaling.

     

    Well look what's talking. You wouldn't know what a "mind" was, goofball, if your boyfriend shoved it up your ample jew ass.

    This is the same methodology which plagues scientific research and experimental conclusions. Known as Reverse Engineering, a conclusion is selected and “evidence” is created or warped to justify the outcome.
     
    First, big words don't work for you, you silly retard. Second, I stated an opinion based on common sense reasoning applied to what I believe are relevant, generally accepted facts. If you don't agree with my conclusion, then rather than waste time and bandwidth here with yet another of your trademark irrelevant, childishly incoherent word salads, maybe you could try to refute what I said e.g. by getting your care giver or some other sympathetic adult to help you compose something meaningful.

    Your comment is of low quality, non-sequiturs, and logical fallacies.
     
    Actually no it wasn't, but coming from from a consummate moron such as yourself, your disapproval is a great endorsement.

    Please redouble your events at greater knowledge inflow and introspective criticism of your low level reasoning ability.

     

    Sorry knucklehead, but I only consider accepting advice from other sentient beings, which obviously leaves you out.

    Replies: @Poupon Marx

    Thank you so much for proving my point as a stylist of the Kamala Harris School of Communication disciple. You are in need of a realistic appraisal of your banality and disjointed thoughts.

    Of course I see you as a mediocre thinker but also a product of modern public schools, and developmental immaturity. Are you paying mom for occupying her house in your adulthood?

    • Replies: @Harold Smith
    @Poupon Marx


    Thank you so much for proving my point as a stylist of the Kamala Harris School of Communication disciple.
     
    You don't need to thank me. Yes, you certainly could be described as a "stylist of the Kamala Harris School of Communication disciple" or something like that, but you didn't need me to expose this notable characteristic of yours, knucklehead, as your irrelevant, childishly incoherent verbal vomit clearly speaks for itself.

    You are in need of a realistic appraisal of your banality and disjointed thoughts.
     
    Perhaps, but both the "realistic" qualification and your embarrassing, relatively far more disjointed "thoughts" would obviously make such an endeavor completely out of reach and irrelevant to you chump.

    Of course I see you as a mediocre thinker but also a product of modern public schools, and developmental immaturity.
     
    Well you're supposed to be looking at your monitor, not your mirror, as you type your infantile drivel, you silly retard.

    Are you paying mom for occupying her house in your adulthood?
     
    I don't see how the question is at all relevant to this "discussion" but being that you've broached the subject, I'll say that right now I'm paying a rather high rent to a unrelated landlord. Unfortunately, not all of us have the ability to live rent free inside our own rectums the way you do, chumpy.
  • @Rurik

    He’s hit by the car. That’s it.
     
    the time he takes to unhoster his gun, could have been used to move out of the way. The car is barely moving at that point.

    You actually think he tried to get hit by the car to justify firing his weapon? Really?
     
    No, what I said is he might have tried to position himself in front of the car to block her from leaving, and/or, as a pretext to shoot if she tried to flee the scene.

    I don't know what he was actually thinking. It's all speculation. All I know is what I can see in the videos.

    But I also think she was a nutjob, full to the brim with woke sewage, and I'm not losing sleep over her loss.

    Replies: @Rurik

    But I also think she was a nutjob, full to the brim with woke sewage, and I’m not losing sleep over her loss.

    I should have added that she was also (stupidly) trying to obstruct government agents from conducting a legal and official, (and much needed) operation. So some people might call that ‘play stupid, games..’

  • One of the most flawlessly executed special forces operations of the last half-century took place in 1979 when Soviet commandos stormed Afghanistan's heavily defended presidential palace, killing Hafizullah Amin and several of his top aides. This allowed Moscow to install a replacement government much more congenial to its interests, though the result was the long...
  • @Anon001
    @j2


    The Kosovo war was 1999, Serbs had too many decoys...
     
    According to NATO's own reports, effectiveness of the NATO attack on Serbia in 1999 was 5% due to all kinds of tricks Serbs pulled including fakes and decoys. Wesley Clark was furious when he got there and realized that the Serbian Army withdrew almost intact.

    Of course, civilians and civilian infrastructure cannot be protected and that is what NATO (aka Joint Criminal Enterprise aka North Atlantic Terrorist Organization) targets to "win".

    [1] Serbian Army decoys photo #1

    https://jadovno.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/ivanov-pilot.jpg_620x0.jpg

    [1] Serbian Army decoys photo #2

    https://www.rts.rs/upload/storyBoxImageData/2018/01/26/23974586/maketa%201.jpg

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    P.S. Many fall for the propaganda and use the term 'Kosovo War', which was concocted by the West/MSM to a) hide the fact that a sovereign country, Serbia, was illegally attacked and not only its Kosovo Province, and b) to create an impression that Province of Serbia called Kosovo was somehow something separate, which legally is not so even today, although they are still working hard on that. In a similar manner, Albanian separatists/terrorists are now calling themselves Kosovars in order to hide the fact that they killed and expelled close to all non-Albanians upon "liberation" i.e. occupation of Serbia's Holy Land called Kosovo by NATO.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    1000+ Anon001 Comments Archive @ The Unz Review | TUR
    https://www.unz.com/comments/all/?commenterfilter=anon001
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Replies: @j2

    “According to NATO’s own reports, effectiveness of the NATO attack on Serbia in 1999 was 5% due to all kinds of tricks Serbs pulled including fakes and decoys. Wesley Clark was furious when he got there and realized that the Serbian Army withdrew almost intact.”

    Not to take any side on the political/ethnic/moral aspect of this war, we were very impressed and happy that Serbs managed to keep most of their army by these tricks, so when I later heard that it will not work next time, it was a bit of a disappointment (though expected). But that’s what they said (and I believe it), they fixed this issue meaning that today NATO has enough missiles/bombs to destroy all fakes, decoys and real systems, and they locate the real ones much better. So, that worked only once, have to think about something else. We did something similar in the WWII when Soviets tried to bomb Helsinki. We turned all lights off and put bonfires to some fields, so these night bombers (they mostly came in the night) did not find Helsinki (I mean, it was really small to be a capital) and dropped the bombs to the bonfires. But this also worked only once, today Russians would not miss Helsinki. Lessons of wars do not age well.

  • Back when I was a young child, I used to enjoy watching my Saturday morning cartoons, and they were often quite amusing. More decades have passed than I'd like to consider and my memories are garbled, but I recall that those cartoons occasionally featured a character called something like Ugh the Cave-Man. Ugh was always...
  • @Pierre de Craon
    @Lawrence Erickson


    I think what most likely happened is that she got an adrenaline rush after the butchdyke said “drive, baby, drive” …
     
    [facepalm]

    There is no legal or moral basis for treating the opinion of a mind-reader as grounds for mitigating or reducing a well-founded charge of willful murder.

    Replies: @Lawrence Erickson

    Lol, I’m not asking my opinion to be submitted in a court of law. It’s just an opinion on what she was thinking. I don’t think we need to read anyone’s mind to see that the shooting was justified.

  • Cry more. America ueber alles.

  • @Poupon Marx
    @Truth Vigilante

    Thank you for the compliments, but we continue to disagree on WWII and your, in my opinion, foggy lens, limited information, immutable infatuation, and dearth of contrary updates and different perspectives on one Adolph Coors Hitleer.

    Some of your positions and opinions I agree with, but I notice you display ideological and rigidity one certain issues that speak not well of an open mind. Most people of this nature and suasion are statically inclined due to personality quirks and structural weaknesses. IOW, their particular constellation of related beliefs is a crutch and main beam or post of their personality, Ego, Psyche, and many time of Persona.

    There is almost a desperation of connotation, a plea it seems, in your sales pitch to see Adolph Coors as a noble figure, to be admired, and worshipped.

    Please see my two extended reply comments under Ron Unz. Best to click on my moniker, sometimes twice, to bring up a list of my recent comments. My opinion is based on Alex Kainer's presentation, which is derived from three books cited, his reputation, and the sum total of my apprehension of sources pertaining to one pot bellied corporal with severe mental health issues.

    Please see also my interpretation and presentation of an evaluation of Heetleer by Carl Gustav Jung prior to WWII. I trust your educational and self-tuition background and cover can handle the concepts and contracts therein.

    Replies: @Pierre de Craon

    … different perspectives on one Adolph Coors Hitler.

    I’m laughing so hard I can barely type.

    I drank quite a lot of beer till about the age of forty—I’m not sure that I’ve even had a sip of the stuff since then, however—and Coors was my favorite domestic brew. I recall how astonished I was to learn in the late seventies that “good” people eschewed the company’s beers and ales on principle. I had enough courage to defy the accepted wisdom, however, and continued drinking the stuff at my local watering hole. On the other hand, I was never able to muster the resolution needed to kill the leftists who told me I shouldn’t be drinking Coors.

    I guess I just didn’t have what it takes to qualify for employment as an armed, armored, and masked ICE enforcer.

    • Replies: @Poupon Marx
    @Pierre de Craon

    Thanks, Pierre. Any humor we can garner in this age we like in are precious, indeed. You have, over the years, provided me with many chuckles and chortles, inveighing against self-deception, inflated cognitive deficits in the commentariat.

    Hopefully, we have in some cases, been successful in spurring spurious mind to return to the sources of knowledge and formulate better and more complete thoughts.

  • @Lawrence Erickson
    @Poupon Marx


    Why didn’t the officer jump out of the way?
     
    I meant this as a rhetorical question, I was agreeing with you that it's a silly thing to ask.

    I don't even think it matters much whether she meant to hit him or whether she did hit him. What matters is she forced him to make a split second decision by ramming an SUV in his face.

    I think what most likely happened is that she got an adrenaline rush after the butchdyke said "drive, baby, drive" and then pictured herself as some Marvel hero, bursting through the horde of faceless bad guys, probably with the musical score flourishing in the background. Too bad, she should have stayed home and watched Netflix instead.

    Replies: @Poupon Marx, @Greg Garros, @Pierre de Craon, @Same old same old

    I think what most likely happened is that she got an adrenaline rush after the butchdyke said “drive, baby, drive” …

    [facepalm]

    There is no legal or moral basis for treating the opinion of a mind-reader as grounds for mitigating or reducing a well-founded charge of willful murder.

    • Agree: Same old same old
    • Replies: @Lawrence Erickson
    @Pierre de Craon

    Lol, I'm not asking my opinion to be submitted in a court of law. It's just an opinion on what she was thinking. I don't think we need to read anyone's mind to see that the shooting was justified.

  • @JPS
    @Poupon Marx

    Since the riots are apparently mostly subdued, (it's been a few days now), RT makes an article about it on January 14. Pravda made a report on the 12th. It was impossible to find mention of the riots and US preparations for war against Iran on the Russian propaganda outlets I look for information on. After many years, the pattern is unmistakable.

    However, this introduces a key paradox: as soon as external involvement becomes apparent (through the involvement of the diaspora, propaganda, or political statements by Western officials), the protests lose legitimacy in the eyes of Iranians. That’s because they are seen not as an internal social process but as a tool of external pressure. In the context of prolonged sanctions and so-called “hybrid pressure,” this perception only intensifies.

    As a result, protests in Iran are caught in a bind: without external support, they fail to instigate significant political change, yet with too much outside backing, they risk losing their domestic appeal. This largely explains why the recent waves of protests, despite drawing international attention, have had only limited political impact.
     

    This is practically an endorsement of the riots, with no explanation of the mechanisms of covert action. There IS NOT explicit mention in this article of US and Israeli involvement. There's no mention of Trump's threats, no mention of US war preparations. One could almost argue that Russian coverage is MORE PRO-ZIONIST more PRO-TRUMP than American coverage!

    https://www.rt.com/news/630957-disorder-instead-of-protest-iran/

    Replies: @JPS, @Poupon Marx

    I’d go further than that. I’d assert that it’s obvious that when KUSHNER and Whatkike spent 5 HOURS with Putin it had nothing to do with Ukraine or coming to an agreement with UKRAINE. They went there to explain the Iran plans. Note the utterly supine position of Russia in the press with respect to the attempt overthrow Iran.

    Russian war-coverage channels seem to no longer cover anything relating to the Middle East – not because that is the point of view of the creators, because those are conditions for their funding and their sources of information.

  • @Poupon Marx
    @Harold Smith

    I believe you will never improve yourself or your mind, which is a colloquial term for the Psyche and Ego, tempered by Archetypes, further than retro-actively searching in the dirt for supporting events to bolster your preening and virtue signaling.

    This is the same methodology which plagues scientific research and experimental conclusions. Known as Reverse Engineering, a conclusion is selected and "evidence" is created or warped to justify the outcome.

    Your comment is of low quality, non-sequiturs, and logical fallacies. Please redouble your events at greater knowledge inflow and introspective criticism of your low level reasoning ability.

    Replies: @Harold Smith

    I believe you will never improve yourself or your mind, which is a colloquial term for the Psyche and Ego, tempered by Archetypes, further than retro-actively searching in the dirt for supporting events to bolster your preening and virtue signaling.

    Well look what’s talking. You wouldn’t know what a “mind” was, goofball, if your boyfriend shoved it up your ample jew ass.

    This is the same methodology which plagues scientific research and experimental conclusions. Known as Reverse Engineering, a conclusion is selected and “evidence” is created or warped to justify the outcome.

    First, big words don’t work for you, you silly retard. Second, I stated an opinion based on common sense reasoning applied to what I believe are relevant, generally accepted facts. If you don’t agree with my conclusion, then rather than waste time and bandwidth here with yet another of your trademark irrelevant, childishly incoherent word salads, maybe you could try to refute what I said e.g. by getting your care giver or some other sympathetic adult to help you compose something meaningful.

    Your comment is of low quality, non-sequiturs, and logical fallacies.

    Actually no it wasn’t, but coming from from a consummate moron such as yourself, your disapproval is a great endorsement.

    Please redouble your events at greater knowledge inflow and introspective criticism of your low level reasoning ability.

    Sorry knucklehead, but I only consider accepting advice from other sentient beings, which obviously leaves you out.

    • Replies: @Poupon Marx
    @Harold Smith

    Thank you so much for proving my point as a stylist of the Kamala Harris School of Communication disciple. You are in need of a realistic appraisal of your banality and disjointed thoughts.

    Of course I see you as a mediocre thinker but also a product of modern public schools, and developmental immaturity. Are you paying mom for occupying her house in your adulthood?

    Replies: @Harold Smith

  • @EliteCommInc.
    @Pierre de Craon

    No slavery was a provision of settlement as was

    learning the language
    obeying the laws of Mexico
    they were to become mexican citizens


    and Mexico failed to enforce the law: inconvenient perhaps, but that failure led to their loss of the region, all because Mexicans down under did not want to occupy their territories. The opted to use foreigners to maintain the land and fight off native americans --- heavy price to pay. And now Mexico in a second low level war is fighting to get it back --

    Replies: @Pierre de Craon

    No slavery was a provision of settlement …

    Well, it seems that it wasn’t. The sole antislavery provision specified that any children born to slave parents in Tejas would be considered free at birth. The parents themselves remained slaves.

  • @Greg Garros
    @Lawrence Erickson

    It is suspected that the group funding 'ICE Watch' (the group that Renee Good worked with) and these anti-ICE protests is a national group called Indivisible. The group was formed in 2016 to obstruct and resist Trump at every turn. They were a major funder and organizer of the George Floyd riots.

    Lots of accusations of the Right having Pavlovian reactions to the killing (perhaps they do in some cases), but the biggest Pavlovian dogs in this whole ICE affair are the Left-wing groups, who've reacted this way since 2016. This "Indivisible" group, including its Twin Cities offshoot, is perhaps the most classic case of this.


    One of the groups allegedly funding the protests is called Indivisible Twin Cities, which is a branch of the anti-Trump group called the Indivisible Project based in Washington, D.C.

    This group was also reportedly behind the “No Kings” protests that happened around the U.S. last year that reportedly received millions of dollars from Soros’ Open Society Foundations between 2018 and 2023.
     

    https://komonews.com/news/nation-world/far-left-groups-are-behind-the-funding-of-anti-ice-protests-in-minnesota-report-new-york-post-renee-good-immigration-dc

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indivisible_movement

    The group is run by Leah Greenberg (age 38) and Ezra Levin (age 39). So it appears I was correct when I said the following:


    Therefore, I suspect the organizers and financial benefactors of these anti-ICE protests are probably Gentiles. Maybe some younger Jews just getting their feet wet. Until masked Antifa-type agents show up with metal rods and Molotov cocktails, and the black rioting and looting starts, it’s clear the Jewish big wigs haven’t put the big dollars into these protests yet.
     
    Soros appears to have stopped funding the group in 2023. And I doubt the Chabad Lubavitchers who run the Trump White House will allow these protests to gain ground until after Iran is destroyed. So, for now, these anti-ICE protests will fail.

    Replies: @Lawrence Erickson

    Lots of accusations of the Right having Pavlovian reactions to the killing (perhaps they do in some cases), but the biggest Pavlovian dogs in this whole ICE affair are the Left-wing groups, who’ve reacted this way since 2016.

    Yeah, I don’t think I’ve seen a single take on this that didn’t align with the person’s preexisting views on ICE, mine included. My view in these situations is always pretty much the same though. If you don’t want to risk your life, then don’t fuck with the police. Don’t insert yourself in a law enforcement situation, don’t resist arrest, and don’t endanger officers with deadly weapons. Usually it’s a black thug, but I don’t have any more sympathy because it’s a white woman. An SUV is an SUV, whether it’s driven by LeBron James or Taylor Swift.

    That’s interesting about those groups. Regardless of how involved they are, there are definitely many powerful people that are trying to totally neuter ICE. I think the question of whether to give ICE more powers in response is a difficult one. If those people succeed in obstructing ICE, it could encourage further waves of migrants and eliminate the incentive to self-deport for the ones already here. On the other side, there’s Anglin’s scenario that ICE could start rounding up American citizens for criticizing Israel. I tend to think Anglin’s scenario is pretty unlikely. I recall that Anglin also predicted that Trump would use Charlie Kirk’s death as a sort of Reichstag Fire to crack down on free speech. Never happened. That doesn’t mean this one won’t, but I’ve always tended to see Trump and his administration as far too incompetent to pull something like that off. Regardless, I don’t see why he couldn’t just use the FBI to arrest critics of Israel.

    Certainly, the best option would be to target the employers of illegals and institute e-verify. For whatever reason though, that’s never happened. So ICE is what we’ve got, and I’m more concerned about having no immigration enforcement than I am about the remote possibility that it could be turned against Americans.

    • Agree: Greg Garros
    • Replies: @Greg Garros
    @Lawrence Erickson


    Yeah, I don’t think I’ve seen a single take on this that didn’t align with the person’s preexisting views on ICE, mine included.
     
    ^I think that's probably the truest thing that's been said in this entire thread of comments and in the larger national media discussion.

    It seems like everyone is using this particular ICE killing as a proxy for a larger discussion about ICE's right to exist and perform its basic function of detaining "illegal aliens" (foreigners here unlawfully), and whether we should have a border etc. It's devolving back to the 2017-18 "kids in cages!" level of discussion. It's George Floyd 2.0.

    I think Trump is a disaster, but there's no evidence that this incident is anything other than ICE performing its legal duties ---> ICE meets obstructionists/organized provocateurs ---> Provocateurs go overboard. ---> rogue ICE agent apparently goes overboard in response, resulting in tragedy.

    These tragedies happen with local, state, and sometimes federal law enforcement on occasion, especially when people do what you describe:

    If you don’t want to risk your life, then don’t fuck with the police. Don’t insert yourself in a law enforcement situation
     
    It's a generally rare thing, and a case-by-case thing. I assume Renee Good's estate will have the right to sue ICE here, and they will probably win a few million bucks.

    I haven't heard one person say that the detainments those ICE officers were trying to carry out were illegal or outside the scope of ICE's duties.


    Also - Oversight and control of ICE was transferred to the Dept of Homeland Security (DHS) in 2003 (after 9/11). If this incident is going to trigger a larger discussion about whether ICE should exist, some discussion of its origin is warranted, but I'm seeing none of that.

    I’m more concerned about having no immigration enforcement than I am about the remote possibility that it could be turned against Americans.
     
    ^Another good point.

    Trump ran 3 times on solving this immigration issue and its the only reason he ever became President. Arguably the only federal agency that deserved to have its budget increased is ICE. An increase is ICE agents and an increase in immigration judges to deal with the cases is a commensurate response to the size of the immigration problem that exists.

    But of course, like everything, the Israel-loyalists tend to hijack these programs for their own purposes, so I'm willing to criticize ICE when it targets foreigners for wrong-think, like those college students and op-ed writers who were abducted for criticizing Israel. That's a separate issue. But these people harassing ICE couldn't make that distinction if you beat them over the head with it.

    Replies: @muh muh, @Truth Vigilante

  • One of the most flawlessly executed special forces operations of the last half-century took place in 1979 when Soviet commandos stormed Afghanistan's heavily defended presidential palace, killing Hafizullah Amin and several of his top aides. This allowed Moscow to install a replacement government much more congenial to its interests, though the result was the long...
  • @j2
    @Commentator Mike

    "What you write about is in theory. More than a 1,000 NATO planes managed to hit only a few of Serbia’s even older anti-aircraft systems which were able to knock out at least one of those “invisible” planes. I doubt they’d do better against Russia’s newer weapons. "

    The Kosovo war was 1999, Serbs had too many decoys. I was in a military conference some 20 years ago where some NATO people told that this problem is solved, they already could destroy all decoys and real systems. But who knows. What we know from the Ukraine war is that Russia does not have air superiority in Ukraine and cannot protect its area with air defense, and that neither can Ukraine defend its area, and that both sides use drones and missiles, not so much planes. At some earlier stage of this war Russia threatened to use a nuke in Ukraine. NATO response to it was that they will not use nukes if Russia nukes Ukraine, but they will destroy Russian army that is in Ukraine, to threaten like this means that NATO expected that Russia considers the threat as credible. So, was it credible or not? What was Russian's response?

    Replies: @Commentator Mike, @Anon001

    The Kosovo war was 1999, Serbs had too many decoys…

    According to NATO’s own reports, effectiveness of the NATO attack on Serbia in 1999 was 5% due to all kinds of tricks Serbs pulled including fakes and decoys. Wesley Clark was furious when he got there and realized that the Serbian Army withdrew almost intact.

    Of course, civilians and civilian infrastructure cannot be protected and that is what NATO (aka Joint Criminal Enterprise aka North Atlantic Terrorist Organization) targets to “win”.

    [1] Serbian Army decoys photo #1

    [1] Serbian Army decoys photo #2

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    P.S. Many fall for the propaganda and use the term ‘Kosovo War’, which was concocted by the West/MSM to a) hide the fact that a sovereign country, Serbia, was illegally attacked and not only its Kosovo Province, and b) to create an impression that Province of Serbia called Kosovo was somehow something separate, which legally is not so even today, although they are still working hard on that. In a similar manner, Albanian separatists/terrorists are now calling themselves Kosovars in order to hide the fact that they killed and expelled close to all non-Albanians upon “liberation” i.e. occupation of Serbia’s Holy Land called Kosovo by NATO.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    1000+ Anon001 Comments Archive @ The Unz Review | TUR
    https://www.unz.com/comments/all/?commenterfilter=anon001
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    • Replies: @j2
    @Anon001

    "According to NATO’s own reports, effectiveness of the NATO attack on Serbia in 1999 was 5% due to all kinds of tricks Serbs pulled including fakes and decoys. Wesley Clark was furious when he got there and realized that the Serbian Army withdrew almost intact."

    Not to take any side on the political/ethnic/moral aspect of this war, we were very impressed and happy that Serbs managed to keep most of their army by these tricks, so when I later heard that it will not work next time, it was a bit of a disappointment (though expected). But that's what they said (and I believe it), they fixed this issue meaning that today NATO has enough missiles/bombs to destroy all fakes, decoys and real systems, and they locate the real ones much better. So, that worked only once, have to think about something else. We did something similar in the WWII when Soviets tried to bomb Helsinki. We turned all lights off and put bonfires to some fields, so these night bombers (they mostly came in the night) did not find Helsinki (I mean, it was really small to be a capital) and dropped the bombs to the bonfires. But this also worked only once, today Russians would not miss Helsinki. Lessons of wars do not age well.

  • Back when I was a young child, I used to enjoy watching my Saturday morning cartoons, and they were often quite amusing. More decades have passed than I'd like to consider and my memories are garbled, but I recall that those cartoons occasionally featured a character called something like Ugh the Cave-Man. Ugh was always...
  • @Truth Vigilante
    @Poupon Marx


    I will post a video as reference to why Adolph HAD to promote war.
     
    Poupy, I can't understand how, on the one hand you acknowledge the existence of the Zionist International Deep State Oligarchs (aka ZOG), and the degree of death and depravity they cause, and yet, for some unfathomable reason, you can't see that Malignant International Jewry manoeuvred/intimidated/bribed western politicians and other heads of state to create the circumstances that would INEVITABLY lead to WWII* - with the express intention of destroying NSDAP Germany.

    (*In fact this is just as true in relation to the circumstances relating to the outbreak of WWI).

    Adolf Hitler had the FORESIGHT to see what was being done to Germany many years before becoming Chancellor. In accordance with that knowledge, he armed his nation in advance as a means of countering what he knew was coming.
    Absent all the Jewish chicanery, there WOULD HAVE BEEN NO OUTBREAK OF WWII (at least not between Germany and the western powers).

    But, seeing as Stalin sought the conquest of western Europe and the expansion of the Soviet Empire, war with the Jewish Bolshevik evil empire could not be avoided.
    So Hitler did what was necessary to secure the safety and future prosperity of the Deutsches Volk as best he could.

    Got it now Poupy? Do you understand the correlation between Cause and Effect?

    Malignant International Jewry's number one priority, as early as the late 19th/early 20th century, was the elimination and subjugation of a rival hegemon to the Anglo-Zionist empire.
    Germany was that up and coming Industrial Colossus that, left unchecked, could become the preeminent economic power on the planet.

    (Hitler saw what was being done to his nation during WWI, and it was doubly reinforced by the continuation of the post Armistice blockade of food supplies that resulted in countless hundreds of thousands of fellow Germans starving for nothing).

    If that wasn't proof enough, we have the unjust and crushing provisions/reparations imposed by the Treaty of Versailles.
    ALL OF THIS made it evident that the Talmudic misfits wanted to pummel Germany into the turf once and for all.

    In other words, all of the above came FIRST, and Hitler's efforts to ensure the security of his nation (through a military build up), came SECOND.

    Poupy, on some issues you're very well informed indeed.
    But as far as WWII is concerned, you've been thoroughly duped by the Jewish propaganda.
    You've swallowed the near entirety of their B.S by watching the ZOG controlled History Channel and endless reruns of Swindlers List.

    You are BADLY in need of an education on WWII - because right now you are clueless.
    You would do well do re-read all of the articles on this conflict and on the Holohoax posted by Ron Unz over the years. That will get you up to speed.

    And last, but certainly most, you need to read all of John Wear's brilliant book 'Germany's War'.
    (Which you can read in this webzine for free - due to Mr Unz's magnanimity in paying John Wear for the rights to publish his book here):
    https://www.unz.com/book/john_wear__germanys-war/

    Replies: @Poupon Marx, @Poupon Marx

    Most discussions of WWII have degenerated to mere narratives and memes. They also are repetitive, low on verifiable evidence, and “out of the box search and consideration”. That requires individual relentless curiosity.

    On my own, I often wondered how Hitler financed so much of a military, social, and public works without concomitant trade increases. I had commented on this using discovered sources, earlier this year, I believe. [Much of your opinions and comments were countered by me and others in previous posts. That’s why I encourage you to read my comments regularly]

    Please read the following intrepid report that transgresses cliches, and trite tread worn material.


    Video Link

    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
    @Poupon Marx

    Your video is over two hours long.
    So rather than watch all of it and risk brain impairment from hearing the tired old ZOG talking points repeated for the umpteenth time, I just skimmed through it.

    And, as is customary for the more sophisticated propaganda, whilst it draws on actual facts in its explanations, it then extrapolates the wrong conclusions - by making assumptions that fit in with the 'demonisation of Hitler and the NSDAP' agenda.

    Poupy, seriously, you are in desperate need of some tough love.
    I can't help but laugh when you hand out advice to me and others, telling us to be more 'open minded' and not set in our ways.
    That really cracks me up when I hear that coming from you.


    You see, and I know a ton of the UR readership will agree, there is no one whose views are MORE SET IN STONE than yours.
     
    I've suggested (for your benefit), that you read all of John Wear's world class book 'Germany's War'.
    I even graciously provided the link* for you in previous UR threads that you were engaged in.

    (*For the benefit of UR readers who want to learn TRUE WWII history, authored by a colossus of integrity, click on the link below):
    https://www.unz.com/book/john_wear__germanys-war/

    But did you read it? Did you attempt to read one of the chapters?
    (I suspect you haven't looked at a single page).
    And you likely won't attempt to, because it will eviscerate your cartoonish/ZOG inspired depiction of how WWII transpired and shatter your illusions.

    Yes, John Wear's book (accompanied by countless hundreds - if not 1000's - of citations and footnotes which comprehensively back up his claims), will turn your world upside down.
    I suspect that you're too afraid to risk the likelihood that you'll be forced to leave your cocooned little world of Mass Formation Psychosis, the one that reinforces your present flawed belief system on historical matters.

    Unlike you, I go out of my way in attempting to falsify my preconceptions on various issues, be that on 9/11, the murders of JFK/RFK/JFK Jr, the Covid Psyop, the alleged Anthropogenic Global Warming or whatever.

    And along the way I've had to amend, and at times discard completely, those beliefs I had that no longer withstood scrutiny.
    And I FEEL BETTER for having done that - because by doing so I inch closer to the truth.

    You on the other hand, do NOT seek out the truth.
    What you do seek out is CONFIRMATION BIAS. You only seek out those questionable (often ZOG funded/affiliated) sources that confirm what you were told as a kid.

    ie: that those dastardly Germans invaded 'us peaceful Greeks' (you did mention this was your ethnic background as I recall).
    And thus you will never entertain the possibility that the Germans (when viewed as a collective), were anything other than evil.
    And that they, and they ALONE, are entirely responsible for the commencement of WWII.

    Summary: No Nation, No Regime, is ever entirely bad or entirely good.
    You will find countless examples of evil deeds to demonise whatever nation/regime that you choose to put under the microscope. There's always dirt we can dig out about them.
    But, using any honest metric you choose to apply, you will soon determine that:

    The crimes of the Anglo-Zionist empire alone (during WWII and in the immediate post war years), were perhaps an ORDER OF MAGNITUDE MORE HEINOUS, both in qualitative and quantitative terms, than anything the Germans did during WWII.

    If we were to then add the crimes of the Judeo-Bolshevik Soviet empire with Stalin at the helm (ie: initiatives the latter undertook that were directly responsible for the loss of millions of Soviet citizens and millions more of Soviet POW's - through his Scorched Earth Policies and other heavy handedness), then the disparity blows out further still.
     
    And one last thing that you (and others in this webzine) refuse to accept:

    There is NO QUESTION that Hitler and the Third Reich came the closest of all to bringing about the demise of ZOG.
    Unfortunately he was unsuccessful.
    Because the ZOG miscreants manipulated the Allied nations and the Judeo-Bolshevik Soviet Union into sacrificing their blood and treasure by siding with them.

    If you or your forebears are advocating against Hitler and NSDAP Germany, then ipso facto you are ALIGNING WITH ZOG.
    It's that simple. No need to complicate matters.

    The stupid Serbs sided with ZOG in two World Wars.
    The gullible Poles sided with ZOG by accepting the assurances of FDR and ZOG controlled Gross Britain.
    You stupid Greeks likewise made the worst possible choice.

    ZOG emerged victorious from WWII. The rest of us lost - although to varying degrees.
    What is happening to the U.S today, in western Europe, Australia where I live and elsewhere, is a direct consequence of siding with EVIL in both WWI & II.
    That is the reality.
  • @Poupon Marx
    @JPS


    It isn’t confined to South Front either. Every Russian source I regularly go to seems to line up with the Jewish narratives.
     
    Ludicrous. Perhaps you haven't' discovered you are a Shabbos Goy yet.

    https://www.rt.com

    https://english.pravda.ru

    https://en.iz.ru

    https://english.pravda.ru/world/165384-palestinian_cause/

    Replies: @JPS

    Since the riots are apparently mostly subdued, (it’s been a few days now), RT makes an article about it on January 14. Pravda made a report on the 12th. It was impossible to find mention of the riots and US preparations for war against Iran on the Russian propaganda outlets I look for information on. After many years, the pattern is unmistakable.

    However, this introduces a key paradox: as soon as external involvement becomes apparent (through the involvement of the diaspora, propaganda, or political statements by Western officials), the protests lose legitimacy in the eyes of Iranians. That’s because they are seen not as an internal social process but as a tool of external pressure. In the context of prolonged sanctions and so-called “hybrid pressure,” this perception only intensifies.

    As a result, protests in Iran are caught in a bind: without external support, they fail to instigate significant political change, yet with too much outside backing, they risk losing their domestic appeal. This largely explains why the recent waves of protests, despite drawing international attention, have had only limited political impact.

    This is practically an endorsement of the riots, with no explanation of the mechanisms of covert action. There IS NOT explicit mention in this article of US and Israeli involvement. There’s no mention of Trump’s threats, no mention of US war preparations. One could almost argue that Russian coverage is MORE PRO-ZIONIST more PRO-TRUMP than American coverage!

    https://www.rt.com/news/630957-disorder-instead-of-protest-iran/

    • Replies: @JPS
    @JPS

    I'd go further than that. I'd assert that it's obvious that when KUSHNER and Whatkike spent 5 HOURS with Putin it had nothing to do with Ukraine or coming to an agreement with UKRAINE. They went there to explain the Iran plans. Note the utterly supine position of Russia in the press with respect to the attempt overthrow Iran.

    Russian war-coverage channels seem to no longer cover anything relating to the Middle East - not because that is the point of view of the creators, because those are conditions for their funding and their sources of information.

    , @Poupon Marx
    @JPS

    You're obviously a poor chess player, and poker player. Transparent, and I don't mean deep in thought or clear thinking. While you are confined to riding a donkey, Putin and Xi are streaking across the sky in stealth mode at hypersonic speed.

    Please retire to study and serious thought before writing in a public forum.

  • He’s hit by the car. That’s it.

    the time he takes to unhoster his gun, could have been used to move out of the way. The car is barely moving at that point.

    You actually think he tried to get hit by the car to justify firing his weapon? Really?

    No, what I said is he might have tried to position himself in front of the car to block her from leaving, and/or, as a pretext to shoot if she tried to flee the scene.

    I don’t know what he was actually thinking. It’s all speculation. All I know is what I can see in the videos.

    But I also think she was a nutjob, full to the brim with woke sewage, and I’m not losing sleep over her loss.

    • Replies: @Rurik
    @Rurik


    But I also think she was a nutjob, full to the brim with woke sewage, and I’m not losing sleep over her loss.
     
    I should have added that she was also (stupidly) trying to obstruct government agents from conducting a legal and official, (and much needed) operation. So some people might call that 'play stupid, games..'
  • @Anonymous
    @Ron Unz


    The one you highlight appears to show that the car hit the ICE agent, which seems rather implausible since he afterwards showed not the slightest sign of any physical injury. But because of the positioning of the camera, what actually happened is far from clear.
     
    Hmm…

    ICE agent who shot Renee Good suffered internal bleeding, officials say

    By Nicole Sganga, Jennifer Jacobs
    Updated on: January 14, 2026

    The Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent who fatally shot Renee Good last week in Minneapolis, Jonathan Ross, suffered internal bleeding to the torso following the incident, according to two U.S. officials briefed on his medical condition…

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ice-officer-who-shot-renee-good-internal-injuries-sources-say/

     

    Wait, we need a second opinion! Please forward those CT scans to our resident armchair biomechanical/accident reconstruction expert to examine… from his armchair!


    https://static01.nyt.com/images/2016/01/14/us/15harvard-web1/15harvard-web1-superJumbo.jpg

     

    Replies: @Antiwar7, @Truth Vigilante, @Ron Unz

    So anonymous comments are proof. Appropriate for an anonymous commenter.

  • @Rurik
    @Rich


    If you can’t see the agent getting hit in the video, there’s just nothing else to argue about. You live in an alternate reality.
     
    you're right about the skittles and the knee-jerk sympathies of the ((media))

    and yes, I can see where he was struck by the vehicle, but I'll give you my take on that, fwiw.

    He could see that the other agent was ordering the provocateur out of her vehicle. He understood, as we all do, that in situations like that, there is the possibility that the person may try to gun the gas, and flee the scene, and so I think he positioned himself at the front of her SUV, to block her from leaving, but he did so in such a way that he could both, shoot her, if she tried to leave, but also in such a way as to allow himself to move out of the way, if she continued to drive away.

    Because he was at the corner of her vehicle, and not directly in front of it, when she gunned the gas, I don't think he was in imminent danger, I suspect his position was deliberate and calculated to give him a pretext for deadly force, while also allowing him to avoid serious injury to himself.

    That, fwiw, it how it all looks to me.

    If so, I suppose the shooting was not justified, if I'm right about what happened. But then I have no way of knowing if that's what he was doing, or what was going through his mind.

    But this issue is far, far wider than just that person's death.

    This country is at war. We saw that with the BLM rioters, burning and looting and murdering, to the indifference of our nation's highest law enforcement, and support of the media, ('mostly peaceful protests, blah, blah).

    In a way, this shooting is like Kyle Rittenhouse, with the people who were supporting Kyle, being the people who now support the ICE agent, because these are the 'law and order' people, who don't approve of burning and looting, just as now they don't approve of a lawless, open border.

    Vs. those who supported the BLM rioters, and now support the ICE protesters, because this country is 'racist', blah, blah.. and so the BLM rioters were the good guys, and the ICE protesters are the good guys, and when they block vehicles, they're doing good. But if an ICE agent blocks a vehicle, he's bad.

    There are very few people who are utterly objective about what happened. It's all relative, and all depends on their respective perspectives, and sympathies.

    Replies: @Rich

    He’s hit by the car. That’s it. Whether he’s on the left, right or in the middle. First, all the lefties said he wasn’t hit. Now that video evidence shows he was hit, it was “only” by the front corner of the car?. This would be funny if it wasn’t so sad. You actually think he tried to get hit by the car to justify firing his weapon? Really?

    I’m well acquainted with people who’ve been mistreated by law enforcement. I don’t just jump on the bandwagon. But this is open and shut.

  • @Lawrence Erickson
    @Poupon Marx


    Why didn’t the officer jump out of the way?
     
    I meant this as a rhetorical question, I was agreeing with you that it's a silly thing to ask.

    I don't even think it matters much whether she meant to hit him or whether she did hit him. What matters is she forced him to make a split second decision by ramming an SUV in his face.

    I think what most likely happened is that she got an adrenaline rush after the butchdyke said "drive, baby, drive" and then pictured herself as some Marvel hero, bursting through the horde of faceless bad guys, probably with the musical score flourishing in the background. Too bad, she should have stayed home and watched Netflix instead.

    Replies: @Poupon Marx, @Greg Garros, @Pierre de Craon, @Same old same old

    It is suspected that the group funding ‘ICE Watch’ (the group that Renee Good worked with) and these anti-ICE protests is a national group called Indivisible. The group was formed in 2016 to obstruct and resist Trump at every turn. They were a major funder and organizer of the George Floyd riots.

    Lots of accusations of the Right having Pavlovian reactions to the killing (perhaps they do in some cases), but the biggest Pavlovian dogs in this whole ICE affair are the Left-wing groups, who’ve reacted this way since 2016. This “Indivisible” group, including its Twin Cities offshoot, is perhaps the most classic case of this.

    One of the groups allegedly funding the protests is called Indivisible Twin Cities, which is a branch of the anti-Trump group called the Indivisible Project based in Washington, D.C.

    This group was also reportedly behind the “No Kings” protests that happened around the U.S. last year that reportedly received millions of dollars from Soros’ Open Society Foundations between 2018 and 2023.

    https://komonews.com/news/nation-world/far-left-groups-are-behind-the-funding-of-anti-ice-protests-in-minnesota-report-new-york-post-renee-good-immigration-dc

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indivisible_movement

    The group is run by Leah Greenberg (age 38) and Ezra Levin (age 39). So it appears I was correct when I said the following:

    Therefore, I suspect the organizers and financial benefactors of these anti-ICE protests are probably Gentiles. Maybe some younger Jews just getting their feet wet. Until masked Antifa-type agents show up with metal rods and Molotov cocktails, and the black rioting and looting starts, it’s clear the Jewish big wigs haven’t put the big dollars into these protests yet.

    Soros appears to have stopped funding the group in 2023. And I doubt the Chabad Lubavitchers who run the Trump White House will allow these protests to gain ground until after Iran is destroyed. So, for now, these anti-ICE protests will fail.

    • Replies: @Lawrence Erickson
    @Greg Garros


    Lots of accusations of the Right having Pavlovian reactions to the killing (perhaps they do in some cases), but the biggest Pavlovian dogs in this whole ICE affair are the Left-wing groups, who’ve reacted this way since 2016.
     
    Yeah, I don't think I've seen a single take on this that didn't align with the person's preexisting views on ICE, mine included. My view in these situations is always pretty much the same though. If you don't want to risk your life, then don't fuck with the police. Don't insert yourself in a law enforcement situation, don't resist arrest, and don't endanger officers with deadly weapons. Usually it's a black thug, but I don't have any more sympathy because it's a white woman. An SUV is an SUV, whether it's driven by LeBron James or Taylor Swift.

    That's interesting about those groups. Regardless of how involved they are, there are definitely many powerful people that are trying to totally neuter ICE. I think the question of whether to give ICE more powers in response is a difficult one. If those people succeed in obstructing ICE, it could encourage further waves of migrants and eliminate the incentive to self-deport for the ones already here. On the other side, there's Anglin's scenario that ICE could start rounding up American citizens for criticizing Israel. I tend to think Anglin's scenario is pretty unlikely. I recall that Anglin also predicted that Trump would use Charlie Kirk's death as a sort of Reichstag Fire to crack down on free speech. Never happened. That doesn't mean this one won't, but I've always tended to see Trump and his administration as far too incompetent to pull something like that off. Regardless, I don't see why he couldn't just use the FBI to arrest critics of Israel.

    Certainly, the best option would be to target the employers of illegals and institute e-verify. For whatever reason though, that's never happened. So ICE is what we've got, and I'm more concerned about having no immigration enforcement than I am about the remote possibility that it could be turned against Americans.

    Replies: @Greg Garros

  • @Rich
    @littlereddot

    Look, the video shows him being struck by the car. If that's not enough for you guys, nothing is. You just want, or need, to believe that this woman was killed in cold blood. I'm sure you were all-in on hands up, knee on neck, out getting skittles, too. If you can't see the agent getting hit in the video, there's just nothing else to argue about. You live in an alternate reality.

    Replies: @Rurik, @littlereddot, @Joe Levantine

    If you can’t see the agent getting hit in the video, there’s just nothing else to argue about. You live in an alternate reality.

    you’re right about the skittles and the knee-jerk sympathies of the ((media))

    and yes, I can see where he was struck by the vehicle, but I’ll give you my take on that, fwiw.

    He could see that the other agent was ordering the provocateur out of her vehicle. He understood, as we all do, that in situations like that, there is the possibility that the person may try to gun the gas, and flee the scene, and so I think he positioned himself at the front of her SUV, to block her from leaving, but he did so in such a way that he could both, shoot her, if she tried to leave, but also in such a way as to allow himself to move out of the way, if she continued to drive away.

    Because he was at the corner of her vehicle, and not directly in front of it, when she gunned the gas, I don’t think he was in imminent danger, I suspect his position was deliberate and calculated to give him a pretext for deadly force, while also allowing him to avoid serious injury to himself.

    That, fwiw, it how it all looks to me.

    If so, I suppose the shooting was not justified, if I’m right about what happened. But then I have no way of knowing if that’s what he was doing, or what was going through his mind.

    But this issue is far, far wider than just that person’s death.

    This country is at war. We saw that with the BLM rioters, burning and looting and murdering, to the indifference of our nation’s highest law enforcement, and support of the media, (‘mostly peaceful protests, blah, blah).

    In a way, this shooting is like Kyle Rittenhouse, with the people who were supporting Kyle, being the people who now support the ICE agent, because these are the ‘law and order’ people, who don’t approve of burning and looting, just as now they don’t approve of a lawless, open border.

    Vs. those who supported the BLM rioters, and now support the ICE protesters, because this country is ‘racist’, blah, blah.. and so the BLM rioters were the good guys, and the ICE protesters are the good guys, and when they block vehicles, they’re doing good. But if an ICE agent blocks a vehicle, he’s bad.

    There are very few people who are utterly objective about what happened. It’s all relative, and all depends on their respective perspectives, and sympathies.

    • Thanks: Joe Levantine
    • Replies: @Rich
    @Rurik

    He's hit by the car. That's it. Whether he's on the left, right or in the middle. First, all the lefties said he wasn't hit. Now that video evidence shows he was hit, it was "only" by the front corner of the car?. This would be funny if it wasn't so sad. You actually think he tried to get hit by the car to justify firing his weapon? Really?

    I'm well acquainted with people who've been mistreated by law enforcement. I don't just jump on the bandwagon. But this is open and shut.

  • @Harold Smith
    The unprecedented mass resignation of six federal prosecutors in MI would seem to be pretty solid circumstantial evidence that the MFOB's DOJ is acting in bad faith in the aftermath of the shooting of Renee Good.

    If there was any merit to the claim that Ross was actually struck by the SUV driven by Good, intentionally or not, the MFOB's DOJ henchmen likely wouldn't be doing things like refusing to cooperate with MI authorities, demanding an investigation into the background of Becca Good, apparently so as to dig up any "dirt" on her that might be useful in portraying the victim in a bad light, i.e. as someone who would assault an ICE agent, etc.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/federal-prosecutors-minnesota-resign-joe-thompson/

    Replies: @Poupon Marx, @Harold Smith

    The unprecedented mass resignation of six federal prosecutors in MI…

    Make that MN not MI.

  • @Joe Levantine
    @Rich

    I did see the video from different angles posted in X. The ICE officer was not within the line of the car.

    The facts on the ground should be well debated in a court of law once all evidences are exposed.

    “Do you still believe Chauvin was leaning on Floyd’s neck?”

    From a video that I watched, it looked like Chauvin was totally innocent of all charges against him. The video recorded all the standoff with Floyd, maybe from the helmet camera of one of the policemen involved. But the media had already pronounced Chauvin guilty and the court procedure did not base itself on real evidence. Chauvin’s trial was political.

    “ you’re seeing this shooting through ideological lenses.”

    I regret to inform you that I do not subscribe to any political ideology. Having lived long enough to see how authorities behave in so many different countries, I found myself with maturity drawn to the side of anarchy. Still I believe in the right of everyone to a fair trial even though the judiciary is by and large corrupt in America.

    Read the case of Martin Armstrong with the New York courts and it should be an eye opener.

    Replies: @Rich

    One last try, comment #452 Punch Brother Punch has a video posted that shows the suv hit the agent. If that doesn’t convince you, nothing will.

  • @Harold Smith
    The unprecedented mass resignation of six federal prosecutors in MI would seem to be pretty solid circumstantial evidence that the MFOB's DOJ is acting in bad faith in the aftermath of the shooting of Renee Good.

    If there was any merit to the claim that Ross was actually struck by the SUV driven by Good, intentionally or not, the MFOB's DOJ henchmen likely wouldn't be doing things like refusing to cooperate with MI authorities, demanding an investigation into the background of Becca Good, apparently so as to dig up any "dirt" on her that might be useful in portraying the victim in a bad light, i.e. as someone who would assault an ICE agent, etc.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/federal-prosecutors-minnesota-resign-joe-thompson/

    Replies: @Poupon Marx, @Harold Smith

    I believe you will never improve yourself or your mind, which is a colloquial term for the Psyche and Ego, tempered by Archetypes, further than retro-actively searching in the dirt for supporting events to bolster your preening and virtue signaling.

    This is the same methodology which plagues scientific research and experimental conclusions. Known as Reverse Engineering, a conclusion is selected and “evidence” is created or warped to justify the outcome.

    Your comment is of low quality, non-sequiturs, and logical fallacies. Please redouble your events at greater knowledge inflow and introspective criticism of your low level reasoning ability.

    • Replies: @Harold Smith
    @Poupon Marx


    I believe you will never improve yourself or your mind, which is a colloquial term for the Psyche and Ego, tempered by Archetypes, further than retro-actively searching in the dirt for supporting events to bolster your preening and virtue signaling.

     

    Well look what's talking. You wouldn't know what a "mind" was, goofball, if your boyfriend shoved it up your ample jew ass.

    This is the same methodology which plagues scientific research and experimental conclusions. Known as Reverse Engineering, a conclusion is selected and “evidence” is created or warped to justify the outcome.
     
    First, big words don't work for you, you silly retard. Second, I stated an opinion based on common sense reasoning applied to what I believe are relevant, generally accepted facts. If you don't agree with my conclusion, then rather than waste time and bandwidth here with yet another of your trademark irrelevant, childishly incoherent word salads, maybe you could try to refute what I said e.g. by getting your care giver or some other sympathetic adult to help you compose something meaningful.

    Your comment is of low quality, non-sequiturs, and logical fallacies.
     
    Actually no it wasn't, but coming from from a consummate moron such as yourself, your disapproval is a great endorsement.

    Please redouble your events at greater knowledge inflow and introspective criticism of your low level reasoning ability.

     

    Sorry knucklehead, but I only consider accepting advice from other sentient beings, which obviously leaves you out.

    Replies: @Poupon Marx

  • Anonymous[219] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ron Unz
    @Rich


    There are no “battling videos”. There are several different angles showing the agent in front of the vehicle being struck. It’s disingenuous to claim the proof in front of everyone’s eyes isn’t real. The agent is clearly struck, the hole in the windshield is from the front. Why is there even an argument about this?
     
    Well, I think there are something like 5-6 different videos, all taken from different angles.

    The one you highlight appears to show that the car hit the ICE agent, which seems rather implausible since he afterwards showed not the slightest sign of any physical injury. But because of the positioning of the camera, what actually happened is far from clear.

    Meanwhile, all the other videos taken from different angles seem to show that the car never touched him.

    Naturally, you and all the ignorant Trumpists promote the one apparently misleading video and ignore all the others.

    Like I said, I haven't been paying much attention to those details or analyzing the various videos. I'm not all that interested in the topic.

    But for those who are, I'd just recommended that they watch some of the different videos and make up their own minds. I think they where included included in those much longer YouTube and Twitter videos that I'd embedded in my article.

    Replies: @Rich, @Anonymous

    The one you highlight appears to show that the car hit the ICE agent, which seems rather implausible since he afterwards showed not the slightest sign of any physical injury. But because of the positioning of the camera, what actually happened is far from clear.

    Hmm…

    ICE agent who shot Renee Good suffered internal bleeding, officials say

    By Nicole Sganga, Jennifer Jacobs
    Updated on: January 14, 2026

    The Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent who fatally shot Renee Good last week in Minneapolis, Jonathan Ross, suffered internal bleeding to the torso following the incident, according to two U.S. officials briefed on his medical condition…

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ice-officer-who-shot-renee-good-internal-injuries-sources-say/

    Wait, we need a second opinion! Please forward those CT scans to our resident armchair biomechanical/accident reconstruction expert to examine… from his armchair!

    [MORE]

    • Replies: @Antiwar7
    @Anonymous

    So anonymous comments are proof. Appropriate for an anonymous commenter.

    , @Truth Vigilante
    @Anonymous


    ICE agent who shot Renee Good suffered internal bleeding, officials say
     
    What 'officials' said that?
    Oh, you mean the same officials in the U.S Health bureaucracy that said the Covid vaxxes were 'safe and effective'?
    Or was it the same bunch of officials that said, in the aftermath of the 9/11 False Flag, that WTC7's demise was due to 'office fires'?
    (Even though it was not impacted by a plane).

    The reality is that Building 7 had experienced negligible damage due to falling debris from WTC 1 & 2. It had the most minor of fires on floors 12 and 13 (which extinguished on their own after a short duration),.
    Yet it collapsed in what was clearly a textbook perfect example of controlled demolition on the day of 9/11?

    Donald Chump's Gubmint and conscience-free goons will conjure up whatever falsehood was necessary to cover for this cold-blooded murder.
    Soon enough they'll say this ICE agent is afflicted with PTSD, that he also got bone spurs and toe nail nail fungus from the incident, and that he's suffering terribly.
    (esp. from the taunts he endures when wearing Open Toe sandals in public).
     
    And soon thereafter they'll set up a GoFundMe platform to raise money for the poor dear.

    Nony-mouse, you're a dupe if you believe what any U.S Gubmint administration (esp. Donald Chump's clearly unhinged administration and its various agencies), are telling you about ANYTHING.
    , @Ron Unz
    @Anonymous


    The Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent who fatally shot Renee Good last week in Minneapolis, Jonathan Ross, suffered internal bleeding to the torso following the incident, according to two U.S. officials briefed on his medical condition
     
    When "anonymous government officials" say something about Iraqi WMDs or ICE agent injuries, I'm skeptical.

    Like I've saying all along, although there's one blurry video taken from one side that seems to show the SUV striking the ICE agent, there were several other videos I saw taken from the other side that seemed to show it missing him. People should watch all the different videos together and make up their own minds.

    However, it's absolutely undeniable that the ICE agent was casually walking around afterwards, showing not the slightest sign of any pain or injury. If he'd actually been hit by the SUV hard enough to cause internal bleeding, that seems extremely unlikely to me.

    If those claims---mostly by "anonymous government officials"---were true, why not release the medical records, CT scans, and X-rays? Is there anything deeply confidential about a CT scan or an X-ray?

    The Trump officials like Kristi Noem all immediately declared the victim "a domestic terrorist." I strongly suspect that the claims about internal bleeding and injuries are about as realistic and accurate accurate.
  • @Lawrence Erickson
    @Poupon Marx


    Why didn’t the officer jump out of the way?
     
    I meant this as a rhetorical question, I was agreeing with you that it's a silly thing to ask.

    I don't even think it matters much whether she meant to hit him or whether she did hit him. What matters is she forced him to make a split second decision by ramming an SUV in his face.

    I think what most likely happened is that she got an adrenaline rush after the butchdyke said "drive, baby, drive" and then pictured herself as some Marvel hero, bursting through the horde of faceless bad guys, probably with the musical score flourishing in the background. Too bad, she should have stayed home and watched Netflix instead.

    Replies: @Poupon Marx, @Greg Garros, @Pierre de Craon, @Same old same old

    I see perceive your comment as level headed and your disposition as one open to impartial facts [are there any other?] and new information. So many people have now engraved their interpretation in stone and nonmalleable metal.

    The study of Buddhism and the Tao, provides space to expand and jump the fence of rigid belief and the necessity of buttresses of opinion tied to one’s self-image and Psyche. Only what is, stripped of personal baggage and bias, affiliations, is really relevant. This applies to many other phenomena, as well. Truth, with a capital T is what it is, not what you mutate or percieve it. It takes personal courage to go outside of your cocoon.

  • @Truth Vigilante
    @Poupon Marx


    I will post a video as reference to why Adolph HAD to promote war.
     
    Poupy, I can't understand how, on the one hand you acknowledge the existence of the Zionist International Deep State Oligarchs (aka ZOG), and the degree of death and depravity they cause, and yet, for some unfathomable reason, you can't see that Malignant International Jewry manoeuvred/intimidated/bribed western politicians and other heads of state to create the circumstances that would INEVITABLY lead to WWII* - with the express intention of destroying NSDAP Germany.

    (*In fact this is just as true in relation to the circumstances relating to the outbreak of WWI).

    Adolf Hitler had the FORESIGHT to see what was being done to Germany many years before becoming Chancellor. In accordance with that knowledge, he armed his nation in advance as a means of countering what he knew was coming.
    Absent all the Jewish chicanery, there WOULD HAVE BEEN NO OUTBREAK OF WWII (at least not between Germany and the western powers).

    But, seeing as Stalin sought the conquest of western Europe and the expansion of the Soviet Empire, war with the Jewish Bolshevik evil empire could not be avoided.
    So Hitler did what was necessary to secure the safety and future prosperity of the Deutsches Volk as best he could.

    Got it now Poupy? Do you understand the correlation between Cause and Effect?

    Malignant International Jewry's number one priority, as early as the late 19th/early 20th century, was the elimination and subjugation of a rival hegemon to the Anglo-Zionist empire.
    Germany was that up and coming Industrial Colossus that, left unchecked, could become the preeminent economic power on the planet.

    (Hitler saw what was being done to his nation during WWI, and it was doubly reinforced by the continuation of the post Armistice blockade of food supplies that resulted in countless hundreds of thousands of fellow Germans starving for nothing).

    If that wasn't proof enough, we have the unjust and crushing provisions/reparations imposed by the Treaty of Versailles.
    ALL OF THIS made it evident that the Talmudic misfits wanted to pummel Germany into the turf once and for all.

    In other words, all of the above came FIRST, and Hitler's efforts to ensure the security of his nation (through a military build up), came SECOND.

    Poupy, on some issues you're very well informed indeed.
    But as far as WWII is concerned, you've been thoroughly duped by the Jewish propaganda.
    You've swallowed the near entirety of their B.S by watching the ZOG controlled History Channel and endless reruns of Swindlers List.

    You are BADLY in need of an education on WWII - because right now you are clueless.
    You would do well do re-read all of the articles on this conflict and on the Holohoax posted by Ron Unz over the years. That will get you up to speed.

    And last, but certainly most, you need to read all of John Wear's brilliant book 'Germany's War'.
    (Which you can read in this webzine for free - due to Mr Unz's magnanimity in paying John Wear for the rights to publish his book here):
    https://www.unz.com/book/john_wear__germanys-war/

    Replies: @Poupon Marx, @Poupon Marx

    Thank you for the compliments, but we continue to disagree on WWII and your, in my opinion, foggy lens, limited information, immutable infatuation, and dearth of contrary updates and different perspectives on one Adolph Coors Hitleer.

    Some of your positions and opinions I agree with, but I notice you display ideological and rigidity one certain issues that speak not well of an open mind. Most people of this nature and suasion are statically inclined due to personality quirks and structural weaknesses. IOW, their particular constellation of related beliefs is a crutch and main beam or post of their personality, Ego, Psyche, and many time of Persona.

    There is almost a desperation of connotation, a plea it seems, in your sales pitch to see Adolph Coors as a noble figure, to be admired, and worshipped.

    Please see my two extended reply comments under Ron Unz. Best to click on my moniker, sometimes twice, to bring up a list of my recent comments. My opinion is based on Alex Kainer’s presentation, which is derived from three books cited, his reputation, and the sum total of my apprehension of sources pertaining to one pot bellied corporal with severe mental health issues.

    Please see also my interpretation and presentation of an evaluation of Heetleer by Carl Gustav Jung prior to WWII. I trust your educational and self-tuition background and cover can handle the concepts and contracts therein.

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
    @Poupon Marx


    … different perspectives on one Adolph Coors Hitler.
     
    I'm laughing so hard I can barely type.

    I drank quite a lot of beer till about the age of forty—I'm not sure that I've even had a sip of the stuff since then, however—and Coors was my favorite domestic brew. I recall how astonished I was to learn in the late seventies that "good" people eschewed the company's beers and ales on principle. I had enough courage to defy the accepted wisdom, however, and continued drinking the stuff at my local watering hole. On the other hand, I was never able to muster the resolution needed to kill the leftists who told me I shouldn't be drinking Coors.

    I guess I just didn't have what it takes to qualify for employment as an armed, armored, and masked ICE enforcer.

    Replies: @Poupon Marx

  • @muh muh
    @Eustace Tilley (not)


    The anti-ICE escalators are not at all interested in your sweet hypothetical “de-escalation”. You can’t even see that?
     
    What I see are multiple videos of ICE agents detaining even American citizens without a warrant, often injuring them or forcibly dragging them from vehicles after shattering their car windows.

    A few posts upthread, I provided evidence of a significant federal rule change that is likely the cause of these abuses that are inflaming public sentiment against ICE and exacerbating an already volatile situation on the ground. Seems nobody paid attention to that.

    Now, you appear to apprehend how this federal overreach bears the potential to boomerang on the right once the left ascends to power. That's evident in your agreement with Pierre here:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/the-trump-doctrine-they-have-it-we-want-it-we-take-it/#comment-7457449

    Which leaves me wondering how you reconcile this agreement with your evident encouragement of ICE's overreach, as demonstrated by your agreement with the manifest provocations of 'Felpudinho'. Your explanation would be appreciated.

    Thanks.

    Replies: @Rurik, @Eustace Tilley (not)

    And I thank you.

    America now, in my “guesstimation”, will be seen by Historians of the Future to be in a similar situation as it was in the 1850s: very evenly divided, increasingly passionately divided, increasingly self-righteously divided by A Big Issue.

    🛑 Red Man: With automation and AI on the horizon, with the nation in $38 trillion debt, with China and perhaps India gathering steam as rising industrial powers, with a large indigenous parasite class demanding federal largesse, is it good for 👉Americans👈 to be opening their borders to a possibly unlimited number of aliens of unknown skill levels and criminal backgrounds who will be competing, with a DEI wind at their backs, against our grandchildren for college admissions and jobs?

    🌐 Blue Man: We imagine there’s no country (I wonder if you can?), nothing to kill or die for: a Brotherhood of Man. We imagine all the people sharing all the Earth. Greedy White Europeans stole this continent by force; by what right, then, can they call it “theirs”? Oh, my Christian heart! How it aches for the poor of the Third World! What right have right-wing racist 👉 Americans 👈 to keep this land unto themselves?

    Both sides are pushing harder and harder. Some on the right are gritting their teeth, accepting that we must indeed embrace “fascism” if that’s what it takes to prevail in this life-or-death struggle for their families, their culture, and their future. They would prefer to keep their decaying Republic and its fading and tattered Constitution if possible, but willing to discard them with regret if necessary. Regimes and ideologies come and go; Blut und Boden abide. The Americans may have to overthrow the fascist regime of their own creation in a century two. But it will still be a recognizable America. If the left wins, their America shall be forever lost.

    The left is following the playbook of the One-Worldists. They lack cultural roots; they lack historical knowledge. They complain that Trump is “shredding the Constitution” although they’ve never actually read it and perhaps could not read it if their college professor asked them to. They are “full of passionate intensity”, in Yeats’ phrase.

    Of course the anti-ICE activists are spoiling for a fight. Of course they seek confrontation, and even escalation of confrontation. They are sure that they’re “the Good Guys”, and, most delightfully of all, are “making history”. They are breaking the King’s law and having fun (the fun of self-righteousness) doing it. They missed their parents’ Sixties, but this is even better!

    Blue is Blue, and Red is Red, and never the twain shall meet /
    But glare across the battle lines on Minnesota street. /
    “Happy the land”, a wise man said, “that has no history”. /
    We’ve just begun to count the dead in The Land of Brave and Free.

    • Replies: @muh muh
    @Eustace Tilley (not)

    Thank you again.

    IMO, we need to transcend the political dichotomy to see matters clearly. Blood and soil abide only insofar as the will to preserve them exist. Ideology is the decisive factor determining whether that will persists or not. As such, ideology makes all the difference, not blood and soil alone. Fickle as our species may be, it remains incumbent upon us to labor for preservation of that ideology most beneficial to our survival and well being.

    As it stands, our nation is divided roughly in half on the matter of deportation, yet in recent months, there has been a precipitous decline in support for the methods now implemented by ICE. There's even noteworthy dissent on the right. In the short term, it looks as if the bad optics of it are likely to cost Team Trump in the coming midterms.

    So it's improbable that the current push for mass deportation, with all of its attendant unconstitutionality, will result in much more than a slight decrease in illegal immigration while inflaming racial and political tensions domestically. However successful, it certainly will do nothing to forestall the inevitable demographic change brought about by remaining people of color, as white birth rates are nowhere near replacement level and there's very little indication this is going to improve in the near future.

    As such, the notion of dispensing with constitutional law in order to salvage a semblance of it in generations to come appears to be little more than a far-flung flight of fancy. If you believe that law is a product of racial ingenuity, well... you just won't have the requisite numbers to revive it.

    I realize this won't convince those who believe constitutional law depends on white folk to survive, but abiding by it is certainly a more effective means of persuading people it's worth preserving than encouraging the jackboot thuggery of Team Trump on a promise you can never keep.

    If you agree with Pierre's assessment of the situation, this shouldn't be too hard to apprehend.

    Replies: @Eustace Tilley (not)

  • @muh muh
    @Eustace Tilley (not)


    The anti-ICE escalators are not at all interested in your sweet hypothetical “de-escalation”. You can’t even see that?
     
    What I see are multiple videos of ICE agents detaining even American citizens without a warrant, often injuring them or forcibly dragging them from vehicles after shattering their car windows.

    A few posts upthread, I provided evidence of a significant federal rule change that is likely the cause of these abuses that are inflaming public sentiment against ICE and exacerbating an already volatile situation on the ground. Seems nobody paid attention to that.

    Now, you appear to apprehend how this federal overreach bears the potential to boomerang on the right once the left ascends to power. That's evident in your agreement with Pierre here:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/the-trump-doctrine-they-have-it-we-want-it-we-take-it/#comment-7457449

    Which leaves me wondering how you reconcile this agreement with your evident encouragement of ICE's overreach, as demonstrated by your agreement with the manifest provocations of 'Felpudinho'. Your explanation would be appreciated.

    Thanks.

    Replies: @Rurik, @Eustace Tilley (not)

    Which leaves me wondering how you reconcile this agreement with your evident encouragement of ICE’s overreach,

    (with Eustace’s permission.. and not presuming to speak for him..)

    because there’s two things going on.

    ICE is doing the job Trump was elected to do, and is their raison d’être, to remove illegal invaders from our nation.

    and then there’s other thing, the looming abuses when ICE is used to go after ‘anti-semites.

    Most thoughtful and decent people support the former.

    It’s kind of like the widely popular Salvadoran president Nayib Bukele’s prison CECOT, for the worst gang criminals. It has transformed El Salvador from the most violent shithole, to a safe country with safe streets.

    From Wiki

    Gangs enforced their influence and made money through murder, extortion, drug trafficking, and operating businesses.[1]: 6 [3] Gangs also influenced national politics by preventing political candidates from campaigning in certain neighborhoods under their control,[3] and gang leaders have stated that they could determine the outcomes of elections.[4] Due to gang violence, El Salvador had one of the highest homicide rates in the world,[5]: 2  peaking at a rate of 103 homicides per 100,000 people in 2015.[1]: 2 

    swindling, influencing politics, violence.. sounds like Minnesota to me.

    But yes, there is a fear that CECOT-type powers could be abused.

    So it’s a devil’s trade-off. The American people want law and order, and asking politely for the illegal invaders to kindly return home, even giving them thousands of dollars to do so, doesn’t work. Like asking MS-13 gang members to be nice and obey the laws. So more stringent methods are necessary.

    Is there a significant fear that these powers will one day be used to round up ‘anti-semites?
    Of course there is. But the Obama and Biden regimes didn’t leave the decent people of America any choice when they orchestrated an invasion of this country.

    Whenever there’s a war, TPTB seize more power to ‘win’ the war. It could be that this invasion/war was all cooked up by ZOG, specifically to give ZOG these powers. But if so, that is the fault of those who invited in the millions upon millions of unwelcome invaders, not the people trying to restore law and order.

    When ZOG decides it’s time to use ICE for another Ruby Ridge-type assault on anti-semites, perhaps that’s when the Second Amendment will come in handy.

  • @OldRelic
    @EliteCommInc.

    I looked it up: US national debt was $3.2 trillion in 1990 before Bush the Elder did a war on Iraq rather than negotiate Iraq out of Kuwait. Current US debt is $39.1 trillion. What's happened in those years: wars. I count it as a war when the US bombs a counry.

    That debt is a bigger problem than immigration, if immigration is a problem at all. Farming would grind to a halt without illegal immigrants. Same for other industries. Impoverishing Americans so that they'll work in slaughterhouses, meat packing, farms, home healthcare, cleaning restaurants, etc. is a crazy idea.

    Replies: @Felpudinho

    Impoverishing Americans so that they’ll work in slaughterhouses, meat packing, farms, home healthcare, cleaning restaurants, etc. is a crazy idea.

    These Americans are already “impoverished,” but they can sit on their ass and receive endless welfare (Shhh! don’t let the blacks, Mexicans and Muslims know about this). Cut the welfare, especially the free food, to make it where in order to eat you have to work, and, after a few missed meals, the deadbeats will be lining up around the block to work those crummy jobs you listed.

    And if all those new service jobs can’t survive without the use of cheap third-world labor – jobs such as delivering food – then let those new jobs fall by the wayside. We got along before those jobs came along and we’ll get along without them.

  • Doing odd jobs in my life especially in my younger years I often had to work with Mexicans. Now these senors and senoritas would be in their 50’s and 60’s now.To be honest I never had a problem with THESE amigos and amigoettes, what would be old skoo Mexicans now. The Mexican and I worked the pit shoveling leaves, branches, and mud that dropped off a line carrying tree ripened oranges at a juice plant in Polk County, Florida. Walk up the tractor trailers and hose them down. I loved it, kept me active and the Mexican was a funny dude. Always had a pint or two of J&B scotch hidden to help us have a few laughs. Watch going down that slippery trailer with the hose, however. Anyhow the Mexican told me he was getting on a bus in Chicago, and he mistook a Native for an Hispanic and talked to her in Spanish,he said she cussed him out. lol. I don’t think Native Americans have any love for Mexicans even though they are distant relatives. I often wore an American flag bandana and the beaners called me Capitan, I guess after Captain America. I did find that Mexicans were quite generous at sharing their food, which was delicious, remember these are old skoo Mexicans not cholos.Nigra ain’t giving you shit.

    • Replies: @Felpudinho
    @Trinity


    I did find that Mexicans were quite generous at sharing their food, which was delicious, remember these are old skoo Mexicans not cholos. Nigra ain't giving you shit.
     
    LOL And yeah, unlike Nigras, Mexicans are generous with their delicious food. It's like my white buddy said, "They use the cheapest cut of meat and it's always delicious."

    The illegals (with false papers) I worked with in a salmon cannery in Alaska were cool to work with and it was was good for my Spanish working and talking side by side all day. They invited me to join them down in Washington state to pick apples but I got lucky and got myself a job as a deckhand on a purse seiner for the Ketchikan fall-fishing salmon season.

    As for that Captain America, American-flag bandana, my little brother used to wear one too. That was back in the late 70's. Until you mentioned it, I had forgotten about it. LOL.

  • Earlier this month I'd published an article laying out the surprisingly strong case that a tumultuous love affair with a beautiful young actress had been a central cause of World War II, the greatest military conflict in all of human history. The War of Goebbels’ Czech Mistress Ron Unz • The Unz Review • December...
  • @Mactoul
    @Patrick McNally

    George Kennan in Russia Leaves the War names William Joyce Thompson, a copper magnate and member of Red Cross Mission to Russia as a person who funneled upto a million dollars of his own money to Socialist Revolutionary (SR) groups post February revolution.
    Of course, he had to leave post-haste when Bolsheviks came to power.

    Kennan observes that while American liberals supported extreme left of Russia even previous to 1917, curiously no support was forthcoming to the liberal Cadet party.

    Replies: @Patrick McNally

    > William Joyce Thompson, a copper magnate and member of Red Cross Mission to Russia as a person who funneled upto a million dollars of his own money to Socialist Revolutionary (SR) groups post February revolution.

    Nothing odd about that. Note that this is after the toppling of the Czarist monarchy. This is not an issue of Thompson somehow supporting the overthrow of Nicholas II. This is a matter of Thompson wishing to support a popular government which had come into power and which Thompson hoped to keep in the war against Germany. Kerensky should have insisted on suing for an immediate peace, even if it meant that someone like Thompson would have refused any aid. The war was unpopular and Lenin realized that.

    > Kennan observes that while American liberals supported extreme left of Russia even previous to 1917, curiously no support was forthcoming to the liberal Cadet party.

    Kennan says no such thing, and it’s a ridiculous claim.

    First of all, what were American liberals supporting before 1917?

    —–
    Western Jewish leaders favored a liberal rather than an extreme or revolutionary movement among Russian Jews. They more readily supported the League for the Attainment of Full Right for the Jewish People of Russia than they did the Bund. The League was founded in March 1905 without socialist participation. In matters of general Russian politics the League, like the Western leaders, favored the Cadets–the Russian Constitutional Democratic Party. On October 17/30, 1905, the tsar promised the introduction of a constitutional regime through a State Duma. While the socialists, believing in the possibility of overthrowing the tsar through a revolution, boycotted the elections, twelve Jews, all of them associated with the League, were elected to the first Duma. On July 21, 1906, the first Duma was dissolved. After having existed two years the League disintegrated and three distinct groups came into being: 1) The Jewish People’s Group, closely connected with the Cadets and headed by M. Vinaver and H. Sliosberg; 2) The People’s Party, headed by the historian Simon Dubnow; 3) The Zionists. Again, the Western Jewish leaders supported the moderate Jewish People’s Group and the Cadets in general matters of Russian politics.
    —–
    — Zosa Szajkowski, “Paul Nathan, Lucien Wolf, Jacob H. Schiff and the Jewish Revolutionary Movements in Eastern Europe 1903-1917,” Jewish Social Studies, Volume 29, Number 1, p. 11.

    After the February Revolution had occurred, Schiff willingly gave money to Kerensky’s government. But Schiff had not been supporting any kind of socialist parties before then.

    Second, what does Kennan actually say about support for the Constitutional Democrats in 1917? You apparently are drawing from a brief comment at the beginning of the book:

    —–
    Constitutional Democrats seem to have enjoyed little sympathy or support in the United States, except in a few business and charitable circles.
    —–
    — Kennan, Russia Leaves the War, p. 13.

    Obviously, “few business … circles” included some important people like Schiff. At best, this is a very misleading statement by Kennan. It was true, however, that anyone who observed the elections to the Duma as they took place in Russia in 1905-6, would have realized that the Constitutional Democrats did not have support among the Russian people that could compete against socialists.

    —–
    On October 30, the emperor, as advised by Witte, issued the October Manifesto. That brief document … made the empire of the Romanovs a constitutional monarchy… After a free election, the First Duma convened on May 10, 1906. Contrary to its sanguine expectations, the government had suffered a decisive electoral defeat…

    The cause of the Left in the First Duma had been injured by the fact that both the Socialist Revolutionaries and the Social Democrats had largely boycotted the election to the Duma…

    In contrast to the first election, the government exerted all possible pressure to obtain favorable results in the election to the Second Duma… But the results again disappointed the emperor and his associates. Although … the Duma opposition, including mainly the Cadets and the Left, might have declined from 69 to 68 per cent of the total number of deputies, it became more extreme… The entire Left membership in the Duma rose from 124 to 216 deputies.
    —–
    — Nicholas Riasanovsky, A History of Russia, Fourth Edition, pp. 409-11, Oxford University Press, 1984.

    Every time elections in which all parties participated were held, the results showed that Social Revolutionaries and Social Democrats had far greater support than Constitutional Democrats, despite the support of Jacob Schiff for the latter. It’s hardly the fault of “American liberals” if this was sometimes noted. But as far as attempts by wealthy outside interests to support any party within Russia, that went to the Constitutional Democrats and related liberal parties. There was no such outside funding of socialists. If Kennan gave a different impression, then he is simply wrong.

    But even Kennan allows for more than just that short statement on p. 13 would imply.

    —–
    Charles R, Crane … a wealthy businessman … was well acquainted with … Paul Milyukov … of the Constitutional Democratic party… Milyukov, whom Crane knew well, was one of those conservative figures who appeared at Kaledin’s headquarters in the weeks following the Revolution… it would not be unreasonable to suppose that Crane, too, urged governmental support to the Kaledin-Alekseyev movement, closely connected as it was with Milyukov and the Kadet party.
    —–
    — Kennan, ibid, pp. 176-7.

    It is surprising if Crane in December 1917 was being low-key about support for Milyukov, since the Constitutional Democrats had only won 4.7% of the vote in the November elections which had just been held. The Social Revolutionaries, by contrast, won 40.4% in the Russian areas and 7.7% in the Ukrainian regions. The overall tallies can be found in Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution, p. 542. There was nothing odd about Thompson attempting to align with the SRs and Kerensky as a more valid political option than the CDs.

  • Back when I was a young child, I used to enjoy watching my Saturday morning cartoons, and they were often quite amusing. More decades have passed than I'd like to consider and my memories are garbled, but I recall that those cartoons occasionally featured a character called something like Ugh the Cave-Man. Ugh was always...
  • @JPS
    @Poupon Marx

    It's only necessary to follow Russian propaganda (like southfront.press) to understand that Putin is exceedingly deferential to Zionist narratives.

    There were no articles about the riots in Iran and the obvious preparations for US attacks until very recently.

    Then they posted pictures ostensibly showing large numbers of dead people in body bags.

    There's not a hint of criticism of Trump, there's no discussion of the pro-government rallies in Iran.

    https://southfront.press/trump-inflames-violence-in-iran-with-call-for-protestors-to-take-over-government-institutions/

    This is pure propaganda for the Zionist Jews, without even a fig-leaf of sympathy for their erstwhile "ally" or "partner."

    It isn't confined to South Front either. Every Russian source I regularly go to seems to line up with the Jewish narratives.

    Just as every fake "right-winger" in the US basically echoes the propagandistic accounts of events in Iran (as Iranian sites are blocked, I can only reach them using Tor). Finally, after several days, Hal Turner, the informant/agent-provocateur imprisoned by the Obama administration for going too far, made a little disclaimer about opposing "regime change" - this is the same character who says he proposed to assassinate President Ahmedinejad with poison on a trip to an Iranian revisionist conference.

    If somebody (like Nick Fuentes) consistently echoes the propagandistic narrative of "what happened" - then there is absolutely no reason to trust them about anything else.

    Replies: @Poupon Marx

    It isn’t confined to South Front either. Every Russian source I regularly go to seems to line up with the Jewish narratives.

    Ludicrous. Perhaps you haven’t’ discovered you are a Shabbos Goy yet.

    https://www.rt.com

    https://english.pravda.ru

    https://en.iz.ru

    https://english.pravda.ru/world/165384-palestinian_cause/

    • Replies: @JPS
    @Poupon Marx

    Since the riots are apparently mostly subdued, (it's been a few days now), RT makes an article about it on January 14. Pravda made a report on the 12th. It was impossible to find mention of the riots and US preparations for war against Iran on the Russian propaganda outlets I look for information on. After many years, the pattern is unmistakable.

    However, this introduces a key paradox: as soon as external involvement becomes apparent (through the involvement of the diaspora, propaganda, or political statements by Western officials), the protests lose legitimacy in the eyes of Iranians. That’s because they are seen not as an internal social process but as a tool of external pressure. In the context of prolonged sanctions and so-called “hybrid pressure,” this perception only intensifies.

    As a result, protests in Iran are caught in a bind: without external support, they fail to instigate significant political change, yet with too much outside backing, they risk losing their domestic appeal. This largely explains why the recent waves of protests, despite drawing international attention, have had only limited political impact.
     

    This is practically an endorsement of the riots, with no explanation of the mechanisms of covert action. There IS NOT explicit mention in this article of US and Israeli involvement. There's no mention of Trump's threats, no mention of US war preparations. One could almost argue that Russian coverage is MORE PRO-ZIONIST more PRO-TRUMP than American coverage!

    https://www.rt.com/news/630957-disorder-instead-of-protest-iran/

    Replies: @JPS, @Poupon Marx

  • The unprecedented mass resignation of six federal prosecutors in MI would seem to be pretty solid circumstantial evidence that the MFOB’s DOJ is acting in bad faith in the aftermath of the shooting of Renee Good.

    If there was any merit to the claim that Ross was actually struck by the SUV driven by Good, intentionally or not, the MFOB’s DOJ henchmen likely wouldn’t be doing things like refusing to cooperate with MI authorities, demanding an investigation into the background of Becca Good, apparently so as to dig up any “dirt” on her that might be useful in portraying the victim in a bad light, i.e. as someone who would assault an ICE agent, etc.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/federal-prosecutors-minnesota-resign-joe-thompson/

    • Replies: @Poupon Marx
    @Harold Smith

    I believe you will never improve yourself or your mind, which is a colloquial term for the Psyche and Ego, tempered by Archetypes, further than retro-actively searching in the dirt for supporting events to bolster your preening and virtue signaling.

    This is the same methodology which plagues scientific research and experimental conclusions. Known as Reverse Engineering, a conclusion is selected and "evidence" is created or warped to justify the outcome.

    Your comment is of low quality, non-sequiturs, and logical fallacies. Please redouble your events at greater knowledge inflow and introspective criticism of your low level reasoning ability.

    Replies: @Harold Smith

    , @Harold Smith
    @Harold Smith


    The unprecedented mass resignation of six federal prosecutors in MI...
     
    Make that MN not MI.
  • @Truth Vigilante
    @Rurik


    But it’s blatant now, that he [Jesse Ventura] is a shameless whore looking to cash in once again, by betraying the people of Minnesota, and the country.
     
    You know Rurik, every man has a breaking point - beyond which he'll crack.
    I don't know what went on behind closed doors to make Ventura venture over to the Dark Side.

    I do know that the greatest WWII historian that ever lived [David Irving], now says that millions of yids were killed by the Germans in gas chambers and shot during WWII - in stark contrast to what he was saying before.

    But Rurik, are you aware of the decades of harassment Irving was subjected to by Malignant International Jewry, how they bankrupted him, culminating in the suicide of Irving's daughter Josephine?

    Are you aware of how wealthy Irving once was?
    Hint: He lived in and owned a house - not an apartment - in the London suburb of Mayfair**.
    (**Mayfair is the most expensive property in the British version of the Monopoly board game).

    Are you aware that he has four remaining daughters - one of which lives (0r at least was living), in Melbourne Australia (who he is unable to visit/see his grandchildren)?
    Because the ZOG controlled Australian Gubmint will not grant him an entry visa* - a ruling that has been in force since the early 1990's).

    (*In the same way that they won't grant an entry visa to Candace Owens or David Icke - because the Jews decreed it thus).
    I know what I do about Irving and his Australian resident daughter because Irving told me so himself.

    So I IGNORE what Irving has been saying in recent years.
    For me he will ALWAYS be a colossus of truth and integrity.
    And the same goes for Jesse Ventura, as far as I'm concerned.

    Yes, rather than subject his family to harassment and physical violence, Ventura may have acted preemptively and taken the Jewish blood money.
    (I wouldn't attach too much to Ventura's swearing-in ceremony and his being escorted by what appeared to be Orthodox Jews. Just like Hitler soon after becoming Chancellor, he did what he did and promised all manner of things - incl. loans from Jewish financiers - so that he could get Germany back on its feet).

    Just like JFK did during his campaigning for the 1960 Presidential election.
    The former made all manner of pledges to the Jews - no doubt acting on instructions from his wily father Joe who knew this was the only way of ascending to high office.
    But JFK had no intention of honouring any of those promises.
    In a similar vein, Jesse Ventura 'went along to get along' during his campaigning for Governor.

    Bear this in mind Rurik: Ventura is not a solitary entity in this world. No man is an island.He's married.
    And he likely shared with his wife the facts relating to the threats he was getting from ZOG.

    (Indeed his wife may have experienced that harassment first hand, as subtle hints from the ZOG playbook are dished out. eg: family dog poisoned, pigs head left on the front porch with a message to 'stick to the script' attached).
    Had he been single and without children, he may well have been willing to risk life and limb to stand by his principles.

    But his wife may well have pressured him into standing down and into taking the Jewish blood money. Can you honestly say you, if put in Ventura's position, would've ignored the pleas from your wife/partner?

    As far as I'm concerned, Jesse Ventura WAS the real deal.
    What he said about 9/11 and other matters came from the heart.
    I will NEVER forget this performance of his on Fox and Friends (refer to the video below), and how he shredded the foot soldier of ZOG called Brian Kilmeade and made him run off the set sulking:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KB8dIOXg1mQ


    Summary: That was PURE GOLD. I never tire of watching that.
    I urge all UR readers to make time to watch all 11 mins of it.

    There will ALWAYS be a place in my heart for Jesse Ventura - the Ventura of bygone years.
     

    Replies: @Rurik

    Hey TruthV,

    I’m aware of all you say about David Irving. I used to visit his website often, back when he had that roguish looking guy, and spoke so often about the ‘traditional enemies of free speech. I followed the trial, where Stephan Spielberg and other wealthy Jews poured millions into it, to effect the outcome, (which they did). I remember how in contempt and mockery, he refereed to the judge as “Mein Fuhrer”. That was classic.

    On a side note, I also used to visit the site of another guy back in the day; John ‘the Birdman’ Bryant, [RIP]

    https://www.big-lies.org/jews/bryant-case-against-jews-mensa.html

    And way back when, he and David Irving had a tiff. It was minor, I merely bring it up because it was part of what I was reading back then, and it gives me a chance to cite Bryant, who was a Mesa guy, and also a brave soul, two things that rarely go together.

    I don’t blame these people, like Irving or Ventura, (and God knows how many thousands of others), when they temper their language, to protect their families. I also saw when Jessie was speaking the truth on Fox, when that ninny got all huffy. I too had great admiration for Ventura back then. I didn’t like when he took the ten million shekels, to stop speaking the truth, but at least he admitted what he did, so at least there was that.

    But now, TruthV, now he is going full-blown ZOG in his campaign to reenter the halls of ZOG power. There is a simmering war going on between ZOG and the Old School, anti-war, anti-intervention, and conservative values America – like no more ZOG wars. Kind of a continuation of the war between Pat Buchanan vs. the neocons, (David Frum, et al) who now also have all the forces of woke on their side.

    The battle lines on that war were Jan 6th, a short time ago, when ZOG was claiming all those protesters were all treasonous insurrectionists, attempting a violent overthrow of our Republic.

    Today, the battle line is immigration, and ‘Is every single person on the planet, a de-facto American citizen’. Or, at least, all the non-white ones, (white Australians or Germans or the Irish, would not be allowed to just walk in and demand gibs), but according to Ventura, every illegal immigrant in the U.S., is automatically an American citizen, entitled to Constitutional protections. This is not only stupid, it’s treason. When you give an invading army, (not a few people, but tens of millions), material comfort and support.

    He knows what he’s doing, TruthV. He’s aligning with ZOG, in it’s war with the last gasps of conservative America, whose values are the Constitution, (just as Ron Paul has heroically defended), in order to bolster Ventura’s own, personal ambitions. And that makes me sick, because like you, I used to admire the guy.

    If David Irving came out and said he was wrong all along about WWII, and that it was the Germans who were evil, who started it all, because they were full of hate for all others, and also, that in Gaza, the victims, the Israels, are only trying to defend themselves’ from Arab terrorists’..

    ..would you still have respect for David Irving?

    Because that’s how I see Ventura’s antics now. It’s shameless pandering to ZOG-left, with disgusting lies about Jan 6th, and illegal invaders. He’s throwing gasoline on the immigration issue, for his own ambitions.

    The reason we all used to like him, is because he was independent, and hated both the Republicans and the Democrats. He used to be his own man, and now he’s morphed into a Liz Cheney clone, in a blatant attempt at returning to ZOG’s good graces, and person power.

    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
    @Rurik

    David Irving has done so much good, he's exhibited so much courage and sacrificed so much in pursuit of the truth (in other words he's built up such a colossal reservoir of good deeds), that I'd pretty much forgive him no matter what he said.
    I'd also factor in that he's an old man who isn't capable of much resistance in his present condition*.

    (* I read recently that his health had turned for the worse and I fear he may not be with us for too much longer).

    As for Jesse Ventura, I was aware of one or two things he's done in recent times that left me shaking my head and thinking to myself:
    'They've gotten to him and that he's succumbed to (((their))) threats/intimidation'.
    But I wasn't aware of those things you mentioned about him. Thanks for updating me.

  • Last week I'd published an article noting the considerable similarities between the reign of the notorious Roman Emperor Caligula and the second term of our own President Donald Trump. According to the ancient sources, Caligula had best been known for proclaiming himself a living god and for declaring that he would appoint his horse to...
  • Y
    Tldr
    Ron as you havevrepsztedly pointed out in exhilarating detail our republics been dead for 80 ish years id argue since lincoln
    Im again disappointed in trump but shame on me for thinking again political solutions might be possible
    But assuming trump has an autonomous bone in his body how the fuck can you fault him for recognizing we have for decades lived in the law is what power says it is land
    I mean at least for once in that 80 years its being exercised by the controlled right because we all know since that damned lincoln the other rule has been only the left decides

  • Back when I was a young child, I used to enjoy watching my Saturday morning cartoons, and they were often quite amusing. More decades have passed than I'd like to consider and my memories are garbled, but I recall that those cartoons occasionally featured a character called something like Ugh the Cave-Man. Ugh was always...
  • “Heartfelt appeal to the authorities: PLEASE, continue to keep Richard Hanania and John Podhoretz well away from the elementary school children.”

    -Buckley Carlson

    https://twitter.com/buckleycarlson/status/2011454016614760550

  • One of the most flawlessly executed special forces operations of the last half-century took place in 1979 when Soviet commandos stormed Afghanistan's heavily defended presidential palace, killing Hafizullah Amin and several of his top aides. This allowed Moscow to install a replacement government much more congenial to its interests, though the result was the long...
  • @Eugene Kusmiak
    @Eugene Kusmiak

    I should not have downplayed the economic difficulties that Russia had in the 1990s as much as I did in my comment. After living their whole lives under the system of “They pretend to pay us and we pretend to work”, I'm sure the post-Soviet economy came as a shock to most people. Private employers didn't pretend to pay people who pretended to work. This must have seemed like a betrayal of the whole "social contract", especially to the elderly who couldn't adapt to the new ways.

    And I'm sure the gulag jailers still miss the good old days.

    Old Soviet jokes:

    “How do you double the efficiency of a Soviet factory?”
    Answer: “Close it.”

    “Is it true that our workers are the most productive in the world?”
    Answer: “Yes. But what they produce is mostly shortages.”

    “What happens if socialism comes to the Sahara?”
    Answer: “A sand shortage.”

    “Why do Soviet cars have heated rear windows?”
    Answer: “To keep your hands warm while you push.”

    “Is it true that socialism will triumph when every worker has a car?”
    Answer: “Yes, but the car will be a police car, and it will be following him.”

    “Is it true that Rabinovich won a car in the lottery?”
    Answer: “Yes, but it was not a car, it was a bicycle. And he didn’t win it, he stole it.”

    “Is it true that the Soviet Union has the best medical care in the world?”
    Answer: “Yes, but unfortunately the patients are not as good.”

    “What’s the difference between capitalism and socialism?”
    Answer: “In capitalism, man exploits man. In socialism, it’s the other way around.”

    Replies: @Been_there_done_that, @littlereddot

    A Soviet Joke:

    “What’s the difference between capitalism and socialism?”
    Answer: “In capitalism, man exploits man. In socialism, it’s the other way around.”

    Long ago I heard that this joke was very popular under a similar guise:

    Instead of “man exploits man” it was “dog eats dog“.

  • Back when I was a young child, I used to enjoy watching my Saturday morning cartoons, and they were often quite amusing. More decades have passed than I'd like to consider and my memories are garbled, but I recall that those cartoons occasionally featured a character called something like Ugh the Cave-Man. Ugh was always...
  • @Michael Korn
    @Poupon Marx

    I agree with the response of JPS and I think you are way overthinking things and grasping for rationalizations to excuse the behavior of a man you clearly deeply admire. I don't know why you are being so hostile. I've written that Putin is a genius. He has many fine qualities. However you are unwilling to admit the obvious which is that he is deeply deferential to Jewish power. And your example about the oligarchs is completely irrelevant. He did not oppose them because they were Jewish but because they lacked sufficient Russian nationalism and were doing things to harm the Russian economy and society. This in fact seems to be the difference between someone like Putin and someone like you who wants to immediately castigate Jews in sweeping generalization while Putin is able to appreciate them as a group while opposing the policies of some of them individually.

    Look at this short video of his response to a question by a Russian reporter about Trump and Netanyahu's designs against Iran. If this does not persuade you that Putin is a paper tiger and completely disloyal to his own allies then I would just have to say you are totally blind:
    https://youtube.com/shorts/R_OERDK2KkM

    Incidentally many people claim that the real Putin was killed and we are seeing a substitute imposter. I think you will admit that there seems to be a world of difference between the Putin in the video you posted confronting the oligarchs and this (((Putin))) who is a pussycat a paper tiger and a dishonest wimp. Even allowing for aging I don't think the two men look at all similar:
    https://youtu.be/3GsDLrUieJg


    It takes many years of study, practice to be able to understand and operate beyond appearances.
     
    I have spent many years following the Unz Review and many other sites and I think I have been able to operate beyond appearances. Furthermore in the realm of politics we do not necessarily have many years to make intelligent choices and decisions.

    Replies: @Felpudinho

    Look at this short video of his response to a question by a Russian reporter about Trump and Netanyahu’s designs against Iran. If this does not persuade you that Putin is a paper tiger and completely disloyal to his own allies then I would just have to say you are totally blind:

    I watched that short video and it proved nothing more that Putin was intelligent enough not to answer a journalist’s hypothetical question that, if answered, would only help the USA/Israel in their decision making.

    “If Trump and/or Israel murders Iranian leader “X” what will you do?” is a question all prudent politicians would never answer. It’s far better to keep them guessing, except on the big issues such as nuclear war. In regards to that Putin made it crystal clear, during the outset of their SMO in Ukraine, that all decisions have already been made if America/NATO attacks Russia and their pre-planned responses will be automatic; they won’t have to waste a second pondering what is best to do.

    • Agree: Poupon Marx
  • @Rich
    @Joe Levantine

    If you watch the video posted at #345 by Poupon Marx you'll see that the ICE agent was in front of the car, was struck by the car and shot through the windshield. If that's not enough for you to give the benefit of the doubt to the officer, you're seeing this shooting through ideological lenses. Do you still believe Chauvin was leaning on Floyd's neck? Or Trayvon was a future rocket scientist out getting skittles?

    Replies: @Joe Levantine

    I did see the video from different angles posted in X. The ICE officer was not within the line of the car.

    The facts on the ground should be well debated in a court of law once all evidences are exposed.

    “Do you still believe Chauvin was leaning on Floyd’s neck?”

    From a video that I watched, it looked like Chauvin was totally innocent of all charges against him. The video recorded all the standoff with Floyd, maybe from the helmet camera of one of the policemen involved. But the media had already pronounced Chauvin guilty and the court procedure did not base itself on real evidence. Chauvin’s trial was political.

    “ you’re seeing this shooting through ideological lenses.”

    I regret to inform you that I do not subscribe to any political ideology. Having lived long enough to see how authorities behave in so many different countries, I found myself with maturity drawn to the side of anarchy. Still I believe in the right of everyone to a fair trial even though the judiciary is by and large corrupt in America.

    Read the case of Martin Armstrong with the New York courts and it should be an eye opener.

    • Replies: @Rich
    @Joe Levantine

    One last try, comment #452 Punch Brother Punch has a video posted that shows the suv hit the agent. If that doesn't convince you, nothing will.

  • One of the most flawlessly executed special forces operations of the last half-century took place in 1979 when Soviet commandos stormed Afghanistan's heavily defended presidential palace, killing Hafizullah Amin and several of his top aides. This allowed Moscow to install a replacement government much more congenial to its interests, though the result was the long...
  • @Eugene Kusmiak
    @Ron Unz


    Putin and the Russian leaders have argued that the 1990s were probably the worst period for Russians in centuries, even worse that the Stalin era of the 1930s, and given the demographic consequences of that former decade they might have a point.

     

    First of all, there were no "demographic consequences" under Stalin. Stalin murdered tens of millions of people, but Russians had tens of millions of children at the same time, so the population actually grew slightly. What made Stalin's murders bad wasn't the "demographic consequences." It was the murders!

    Russia's population went down more under Yeltsin than under Stalin, but that doesn't make Yeltsin "worse" than Stalin, unless you want to say that since Russia's population went down more under Putin than under Yeltsin, that makes Putin "worse" than Yeltsin.

    Soviet Russians were too poor to afford birth control. Post-Soviet Russians are rich enough to afford birth control. That's why there have been bad "demographic consequences" since 1990. But declining population because people decided not to have kids after Yeltsin is not "worse" than declining population because the state murdered tens of millions of people under Stalin. It is really beyond parody that you are echoing Putin's claim that post-Soviet low birth rates are "worse" than Soviet mass murders.

    Which would you rather have happen to you:

    1. Under Stalin: you are lined up in front of an open trench and shot in the head.
    2. Under Yeltsin: you are able to buy birth control and decide to do so.

    That's the difference between the "demographic consequences" of Stalin and the "demographic consequences" of Yeltsin. The fact that Putin says the latter are "worse" than the former really says a lot about Putin and Putin apologists.

    Also, if we're going to compare the "demographic consequences" of Stalin and Yeltsin, let's also compare the "demographic consequences" of Yeltsin and Putin:

    Year Population President

    1990 147,969,551 Yeltsin from 1991 to 1999
    2000 146,404,906 Putin after 1999
    2010 142,849,472 Putin
    2020 144,104,100 Putin
    2025 143,549,097 Putin

    Boris Yeltsin ruled Russia from 1991 to 1999 when the population fell by 1 million. Vladimir Putin ruled Russia from 1999 to 2026 when the population fell by 3 million. So, technically, the "demographic consequences" were worse under Putin than under Yeltsin, although I wouldn't blame either leader for this. But, unlike Putin, I do blame Stalin for the murders.

    Again, the worst thing about mass murder is not the "demographic consequences." The worst thing is the murdering!

    A few months ago, Holland seized control of Nexperia, a Chinese company, and the angry Chinese cut off the supply of its chip-products. As a result, most of the Western auto manufacturers were on the verge of having to shutdown until the Chinese relented.

     

    Sure, sure, sure, we're always on the "verge" of collapse and yet somehow never do. Let me know when the collapse actually happens. And by "collapse", I don't mean the stock market going down 50%. The stock market repeatedly goes down 50%, then up 500%, then down 50%, then up 500%. That's not "collapse."

    So you’re arguing that Russia should basically surrender to America. But the Neocons who were the ones behind the war have publicly declared that they want to break Russia up into a number of smaller, very weak states, and they also clearly want Russia to return to the 1990s, when the country was totally looted and pillaged by the Jewish Oligarchs.

     

    No, I'm arguing that Russia has no good options. It sucks to be weak in a world ruled by force.

    But if the only other option you offer is that Russia surrender and probably be destroyed, I can’t see why they wouldn’t do so [fight NATO].

     

    I think we're at an impasse. We may actually be fairly close in our assessments of Russia's strengths and weaknesses. But we're nowhere near close in our opinions about America's strengths and weaknesses. And we likely never will be because it's hard to be objective about our own country.

    Replies: @Eugene Kusmiak

    I should not have downplayed the economic difficulties that Russia had in the 1990s as much as I did in my comment. After living their whole lives under the system of “They pretend to pay us and we pretend to work”, I’m sure the post-Soviet economy came as a shock to most people. Private employers didn’t pretend to pay people who pretended to work. This must have seemed like a betrayal of the whole “social contract”, especially to the elderly who couldn’t adapt to the new ways.

    And I’m sure the gulag jailers still miss the good old days.

    Old Soviet jokes:

    “How do you double the efficiency of a Soviet factory?”
    Answer: “Close it.”

    “Is it true that our workers are the most productive in the world?”
    Answer: “Yes. But what they produce is mostly shortages.”

    “What happens if socialism comes to the Sahara?”
    Answer: “A sand shortage.”

    “Why do Soviet cars have heated rear windows?”
    Answer: “To keep your hands warm while you push.”

    “Is it true that socialism will triumph when every worker has a car?”
    Answer: “Yes, but the car will be a police car, and it will be following him.”

    “Is it true that Rabinovich won a car in the lottery?”
    Answer: “Yes, but it was not a car, it was a bicycle. And he didn’t win it, he stole it.”

    “Is it true that the Soviet Union has the best medical care in the world?”
    Answer: “Yes, but unfortunately the patients are not as good.”

    “What’s the difference between capitalism and socialism?”
    Answer: “In capitalism, man exploits man. In socialism, it’s the other way around.”

    • Replies: @Been_there_done_that
    @Eugene Kusmiak

    A Soviet Joke:


    “What’s the difference between capitalism and socialism?”
    Answer: “In capitalism, man exploits man. In socialism, it’s the other way around.”

     
    Long ago I heard that this joke was very popular under a similar guise:

    Instead of "man exploits man" it was "dog eats dog".
    , @littlereddot
    @Eugene Kusmiak


    Soviet Union
     
    If you ask an Indian what Pakistan is really like, you will not get an accurate picture.

    If you ask an North Korean what South Korea is really like, you will not get an accurate picture.

    If you ask an American what the USSR was really like, you will not get an accurate picture.

    Replies: @wojtek

  • Back when I was a young child, I used to enjoy watching my Saturday morning cartoons, and they were often quite amusing. More decades have passed than I'd like to consider and my memories are garbled, but I recall that those cartoons occasionally featured a character called something like Ugh the Cave-Man. Ugh was always...
  • @Trinity
    Yes, only Whitey stole from Native Americans not Mexico. lol. Whitey stole the land that Mexico stole from the Injuns. Seeing wetbacks claiming to be “Natives” is hilarious. And lest we forget the Southwest was sparsely populated. The largest cities in 1848 were all eastern, NYC, Baltimore,New Orleans, Philadelphia, and Boston. San Francisco had a population of about 1,000 people in 1848 when the Mexican-American War ended. Indians were screwed by Paleface and Jose as well, but no question who BUILT America. Exactly what did Mexico do with that land they stole?

    Interestingly when Whitey went to Texas, the Mexicans welcomed him, Whitey wasn’t keen on speaking Spanish, most weren’t keen on Catholicism, you can say Whitey took advantage of the situation. Human nature. Now the Beaners feel they don’t have to learn English and not just the Mexican either.

    Replies: @NobodyImportant, @Pierre de Craon, @EliteCommInc., @Felpudinho

    Yes, only Whitey stole from Native Americans not Mexico. lol. Whitey stole the land that Mexico stole from the Injuns. Seeing wetbacks claiming to be “Natives” is hilarious.

    I’ll tell that to my two half-Mexican cousins (sisters) the next time they say, “We didn’t cross the border, the border crossed us!”

    Those two are friggin’ idiots, cute little maxims like the border-crossing saying is about all they got out of a tens-of-thousands of dollar “education” in Chicano & Woman’s Studies at UC Davis. Needless to say, they’re in their 50’s and still relying on their dear ol’ mom & dad for $$.

  • @Ron Unz
    @Rich


    There are no “battling videos”. There are several different angles showing the agent in front of the vehicle being struck. It’s disingenuous to claim the proof in front of everyone’s eyes isn’t real. The agent is clearly struck, the hole in the windshield is from the front. Why is there even an argument about this?
     
    Well, I think there are something like 5-6 different videos, all taken from different angles.

    The one you highlight appears to show that the car hit the ICE agent, which seems rather implausible since he afterwards showed not the slightest sign of any physical injury. But because of the positioning of the camera, what actually happened is far from clear.

    Meanwhile, all the other videos taken from different angles seem to show that the car never touched him.

    Naturally, you and all the ignorant Trumpists promote the one apparently misleading video and ignore all the others.

    Like I said, I haven't been paying much attention to those details or analyzing the various videos. I'm not all that interested in the topic.

    But for those who are, I'd just recommended that they watch some of the different videos and make up their own minds. I think they where included included in those much longer YouTube and Twitter videos that I'd embedded in my article.

    Replies: @Rich, @Anonymous

    You don’t know me, I’m sure you don’t notice my comments on here, but I’m not a “trumpista”. Trump is too left of center for me, but he is better than every democrat politician in the country. As for the videos, yes, they are different angles. Are you arguing that the video of the agent being hit by the vehicle is a fake? That all the agents that have said he was hit and put it in their reports are lying? I don’t understand it. There’s a video showing him get hit. How is there any argument about this? I don’t get it.

  • @Poupon Marx
    @Lawrence Erickson


    Why didn’t the officer jump out of the way?
     
    From the video, it looks as if he did and still got clipped or brushed by the left side of the car. He obviously could have been knocked over and run over by her left front wheel - and more.

    The officer had received an injury previously from an ICE protester that dragged him along the street when his arm got caught in an auto window. For that he received 30 stitches in his lower leg.

    I have never condoned illegal immigration. Both my grandparents came from poverty stricken, backwards Greece - desolate and broken after independence from the Ottoman Empire, after over 3 centuries. They arrived with nothing, not even sure if they could or would be accepted for entrance. They went through the entire process and screening, which was quite vigorous in the early 20th century; through Ellis Island.

    Every Illegal alien is guilty of a crime, as it is illegal to enter the country unauthorized.
    Then they displace American citizens for jobs. And of course they are tools of the International Jew and Cabal that aims to replace native citizens of European extraction with normative average IQ of 100, with those of lower mean. This is for easier manipulation and control, and the greater ease of creating a wage and work slave population for sadistic and material wealth enhancement. The dimmer bulbs of the "White" Race suppress this knowledge and substitute Black athlete worship.

    ICE, doing the dirty work of prying the leeches and other parasites off the fading illumination of the Founding and European stock, gets the "Hate Speech", epithets, cursing, condemnation of the very population that the illegal alien removal invader displace and channel their ethnic pathologies toward. Ironic, No?

    You want the sewage cleaned up from your front yard from an overflow, but you despise and disparage the cleaners, the guys who have to wade out in the shit and get themselves dirty.
    So, who is truly "despicable" and "deplorable", the ICE "Nazis", or the whims and willalambs and weak-minded pishposh pretenders.
    This is a classic case of disconnection, from the problem from its causes and its curers and those of practicing prophylaxis.

    Replies: @Lawrence Erickson

    Why didn’t the officer jump out of the way?

    I meant this as a rhetorical question, I was agreeing with you that it’s a silly thing to ask.

    I don’t even think it matters much whether she meant to hit him or whether she did hit him. What matters is she forced him to make a split second decision by ramming an SUV in his face.

    I think what most likely happened is that she got an adrenaline rush after the butchdyke said “drive, baby, drive” and then pictured herself as some Marvel hero, bursting through the horde of faceless bad guys, probably with the musical score flourishing in the background. Too bad, she should have stayed home and watched Netflix instead.

    • Replies: @Poupon Marx
    @Lawrence Erickson

    I see perceive your comment as level headed and your disposition as one open to impartial facts [are there any other?] and new information. So many people have now engraved their interpretation in stone and nonmalleable metal.

    The study of Buddhism and the Tao, provides space to expand and jump the fence of rigid belief and the necessity of buttresses of opinion tied to one's self-image and Psyche. Only what is, stripped of personal baggage and bias, affiliations, is really relevant. This applies to many other phenomena, as well. Truth, with a capital T is what it is, not what you mutate or percieve it. It takes personal courage to go outside of your cocoon.

    , @Greg Garros
    @Lawrence Erickson

    It is suspected that the group funding 'ICE Watch' (the group that Renee Good worked with) and these anti-ICE protests is a national group called Indivisible. The group was formed in 2016 to obstruct and resist Trump at every turn. They were a major funder and organizer of the George Floyd riots.

    Lots of accusations of the Right having Pavlovian reactions to the killing (perhaps they do in some cases), but the biggest Pavlovian dogs in this whole ICE affair are the Left-wing groups, who've reacted this way since 2016. This "Indivisible" group, including its Twin Cities offshoot, is perhaps the most classic case of this.


    One of the groups allegedly funding the protests is called Indivisible Twin Cities, which is a branch of the anti-Trump group called the Indivisible Project based in Washington, D.C.

    This group was also reportedly behind the “No Kings” protests that happened around the U.S. last year that reportedly received millions of dollars from Soros’ Open Society Foundations between 2018 and 2023.
     

    https://komonews.com/news/nation-world/far-left-groups-are-behind-the-funding-of-anti-ice-protests-in-minnesota-report-new-york-post-renee-good-immigration-dc

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indivisible_movement

    The group is run by Leah Greenberg (age 38) and Ezra Levin (age 39). So it appears I was correct when I said the following:


    Therefore, I suspect the organizers and financial benefactors of these anti-ICE protests are probably Gentiles. Maybe some younger Jews just getting their feet wet. Until masked Antifa-type agents show up with metal rods and Molotov cocktails, and the black rioting and looting starts, it’s clear the Jewish big wigs haven’t put the big dollars into these protests yet.
     
    Soros appears to have stopped funding the group in 2023. And I doubt the Chabad Lubavitchers who run the Trump White House will allow these protests to gain ground until after Iran is destroyed. So, for now, these anti-ICE protests will fail.

    Replies: @Lawrence Erickson

    , @Pierre de Craon
    @Lawrence Erickson


    I think what most likely happened is that she got an adrenaline rush after the butchdyke said “drive, baby, drive” …
     
    [facepalm]

    There is no legal or moral basis for treating the opinion of a mind-reader as grounds for mitigating or reducing a well-founded charge of willful murder.

    Replies: @Lawrence Erickson

    , @Same old same old
    @Lawrence Erickson


    I don’t even think it matters much whether she meant to hit him or whether she did hit him. What matters is she forced him to make a split second decision by ramming an SUV in his face.
     
    Weren't you same ziokikes shouting "don't stand in traffic" a few years ago? Fuck off, Hasbaras.
  • @Rich
    @Ron Unz

    There are no "battling videos". There are several different angles showing the agent in front of the vehicle being struck. It's disingenuous to claim the proof in front of everyone's eyes isn't real. The agent is clearly struck, the hole in the windshield is from the front. Why is there even an argument about this?

    Napolitano, and most of his guests, have gone completely off the rails in the quest for more clicks. They've been wrong on every prediction they make and are now outright lying about facts they don't like. But that seems to be the norm now, as can be seen in the comments here where video showing the agent being struck is dismissed because it doesn't fit the narrative. Hands up, knee on neck, skittles land.

    Replies: @Ron Unz

    There are no “battling videos”. There are several different angles showing the agent in front of the vehicle being struck. It’s disingenuous to claim the proof in front of everyone’s eyes isn’t real. The agent is clearly struck, the hole in the windshield is from the front. Why is there even an argument about this?

    Well, I think there are something like 5-6 different videos, all taken from different angles.

    The one you highlight appears to show that the car hit the ICE agent, which seems rather implausible since he afterwards showed not the slightest sign of any physical injury. But because of the positioning of the camera, what actually happened is far from clear.

    Meanwhile, all the other videos taken from different angles seem to show that the car never touched him.

    Naturally, you and all the ignorant Trumpists promote the one apparently misleading video and ignore all the others.

    Like I said, I haven’t been paying much attention to those details or analyzing the various videos. I’m not all that interested in the topic.

    But for those who are, I’d just recommended that they watch some of the different videos and make up their own minds. I think they where included included in those much longer YouTube and Twitter videos that I’d embedded in my article.

    • Agree: Harold Smith, OldRelic
    • Replies: @Rich
    @Ron Unz

    You don't know me, I'm sure you don't notice my comments on here, but I'm not a "trumpista". Trump is too left of center for me, but he is better than every democrat politician in the country. As for the videos, yes, they are different angles. Are you arguing that the video of the agent being hit by the vehicle is a fake? That all the agents that have said he was hit and put it in their reports are lying? I don't understand it. There's a video showing him get hit. How is there any argument about this? I don't get it.

    , @Anonymous
    @Ron Unz


    The one you highlight appears to show that the car hit the ICE agent, which seems rather implausible since he afterwards showed not the slightest sign of any physical injury. But because of the positioning of the camera, what actually happened is far from clear.
     
    Hmm…

    ICE agent who shot Renee Good suffered internal bleeding, officials say

    By Nicole Sganga, Jennifer Jacobs
    Updated on: January 14, 2026

    The Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent who fatally shot Renee Good last week in Minneapolis, Jonathan Ross, suffered internal bleeding to the torso following the incident, according to two U.S. officials briefed on his medical condition…

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ice-officer-who-shot-renee-good-internal-injuries-sources-say/

     

    Wait, we need a second opinion! Please forward those CT scans to our resident armchair biomechanical/accident reconstruction expert to examine… from his armchair!


    https://static01.nyt.com/images/2016/01/14/us/15harvard-web1/15harvard-web1-superJumbo.jpg

     

    Replies: @Antiwar7, @Truth Vigilante, @Ron Unz

  • @EliteCommInc.
    @Brás Cubas

    Illegal immigration is an iminent threat. There is a low level war going on with Mexico. Bt that war requires more than street force. It requires a thoughtful reconfiguration of the system that employs illegal immigrants and what it would mean to change that.

    But if you don't think there is a war going on, then in my view, yu don't understand the depth of the problem. I was watching some beer commercial in Ca and along with commercial the Mexican flag --- it was bizarre to say the least. Some advertising exec and artist opted to pander to the huge illehgl immigrant population for a buck with a spit in the eye to US citizens.


    Pres Trump and DHS are not fooling me for one second, if they aren;t taking on the core issues. And those issues are economic.

    Replies: @OldRelic

    I looked it up: US national debt was $3.2 trillion in 1990 before Bush the Elder did a war on Iraq rather than negotiate Iraq out of Kuwait. Current US debt is $39.1 trillion. What’s happened in those years: wars. I count it as a war when the US bombs a counry.

    That debt is a bigger problem than immigration, if immigration is a problem at all. Farming would grind to a halt without illegal immigrants. Same for other industries. Impoverishing Americans so that they’ll work in slaughterhouses, meat packing, farms, home healthcare, cleaning restaurants, etc. is a crazy idea.

    • Replies: @Felpudinho
    @OldRelic


    Impoverishing Americans so that they’ll work in slaughterhouses, meat packing, farms, home healthcare, cleaning restaurants, etc. is a crazy idea.
     
    These Americans are already "impoverished," but they can sit on their ass and receive endless welfare (Shhh! don't let the blacks, Mexicans and Muslims know about this). Cut the welfare, especially the free food, to make it where in order to eat you have to work, and, after a few missed meals, the deadbeats will be lining up around the block to work those crummy jobs you listed.

    And if all those new service jobs can't survive without the use of cheap third-world labor - jobs such as delivering food - then let those new jobs fall by the wayside. We got along before those jobs came along and we'll get along without them.

  • @Poupon Marx
    @Michael Korn

    These are very selective references, minor details, and idiosyncratically interpreted by you, underlined by unsupported assumptions and presumptions. Not very convincing.

    His relations with Jews are better evaluated as either plus or minus, debit or credit. What has been the effect of his - in your eyes - Judeophilia on the Russian Republic? Any harm or detriment? Staying close and "friendly" is a way to monitor and perceive changes, wouldn't you say?

    What you seem to be missing is the subtlety and sublime nature of Putin. To you, outward signs, overt actions, and the observable are sufficient and whole to draw conclusions and judgments. At one time 2 dimensional paintings on caves where thought to be the final expression of reality and "how things really are". I submit your missive makes that same error.

    The World of Appearances conceals more than it manifests. There are a lot more things going on here, which are concealed and are not synchronous. Apparitions at times equal appearances, and reveal Reality.

    You know it don't come easy:

    https://music.youtube.com/search?q=it+don%27t+come+easy

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnuNDwmcQW4&t=773s

    It takes many years of study, practice to be able to understand and operate beyond appearances

    Check my other comments, specifically Putin with his meeting with the mostly Jewish oligarchs

    Replies: @JPS, @Michael Korn

    I agree with the response of JPS and I think you are way overthinking things and grasping for rationalizations to excuse the behavior of a man you clearly deeply admire. I don’t know why you are being so hostile. I’ve written that Putin is a genius. He has many fine qualities. However you are unwilling to admit the obvious which is that he is deeply deferential to Jewish power. And your example about the oligarchs is completely irrelevant. He did not oppose them because they were Jewish but because they lacked sufficient Russian nationalism and were doing things to harm the Russian economy and society. This in fact seems to be the difference between someone like Putin and someone like you who wants to immediately castigate Jews in sweeping generalization while Putin is able to appreciate them as a group while opposing the policies of some of them individually.

    Look at this short video of his response to a question by a Russian reporter about Trump and Netanyahu’s designs against Iran. If this does not persuade you that Putin is a paper tiger and completely disloyal to his own allies then I would just have to say you are totally blind:
    https://youtube.com/shorts/R_OERDK2KkM

    Incidentally many people claim that the real Putin was killed and we are seeing a substitute imposter. I think you will admit that there seems to be a world of difference between the Putin in the video you posted confronting the oligarchs and this (((Putin))) who is a pussycat a paper tiger and a dishonest wimp. Even allowing for aging I don’t think the two men look at all similar:

    Video Link

    It takes many years of study, practice to be able to understand and operate beyond appearances.

    I have spent many years following the Unz Review and many other sites and I think I have been able to operate beyond appearances. Furthermore in the realm of politics we do not necessarily have many years to make intelligent choices and decisions.

    • Replies: @Felpudinho
    @Michael Korn


    Look at this short video of his response to a question by a Russian reporter about Trump and Netanyahu’s designs against Iran. If this does not persuade you that Putin is a paper tiger and completely disloyal to his own allies then I would just have to say you are totally blind:
     
    I watched that short video and it proved nothing more that Putin was intelligent enough not to answer a journalist's hypothetical question that, if answered, would only help the USA/Israel in their decision making.

    "If Trump and/or Israel murders Iranian leader "X" what will you do?" is a question all prudent politicians would never answer. It's far better to keep them guessing, except on the big issues such as nuclear war. In regards to that Putin made it crystal clear, during the outset of their SMO in Ukraine, that all decisions have already been made if America/NATO attacks Russia and their pre-planned responses will be automatic; they won't have to waste a second pondering what is best to do.

  • @Punch Brother Punch
    @OldRelic


    She wasn’t going fast enough that he’d be afraid.
     
    The car was moving forward for no more than a second before it struck him. He had no time to determine its speed, and a 4,500 lb. hunk of metal does not have to be going very fast to seriously injure or kill someone.

    No one who defends the ICE guy has an explanation for why he went to the driver side window
     
    He was filming her with his phone. ICE agents are instructed to document their interactions as much as possible and he was moving to her side to get her on camera.

    Replies: @OldRelic

    Gee, that’s a great explanation – He moved to the driver side window and shot her twice more in the head because he was filming. Huh?

    Every shot has to be justified. That’s common sense. Its not like in the movies.

  • @Poupon Marx
    @Avery

    I believe this video will go a long way in clearing up the matter. This woman had already broken the law by inserting herself in a legally sanctioned operation, and then compounding it by blocking the road causing an impediment.

    She then either panics or angrily accelerates rapidly, in a highly charged emotional state, strikes a glancing blow to the official, who discharged his weapon, as he was trained to do. From his point of view, his perception, and split second cognitive evaluation, he is to be given the benefit of the doubt that this woman was using her vehicle in an attempted homicide, against him.

    Arm chair analysis, Monday morning quarterbacking, and emotional preening for virtue signaling is unsightly and repugnant.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y04ndAPynMk

    Replies: @Lawrence Erickson, @Felpudinho

    I believe this video will go a long way in clearing up the matter.

    Here’s a video clip of Nick Fuentes giving his unsympathetic two-cents worth on Renée Good’s demise:

    https://theworldwatch.com/videos/1609599/nick-fuentes-shuts-down-everybody-who-is-sympathetic-to-renee-good/

  • @littlereddot
    @Rich


    How did he get hit by the front of the car and fire through the windshield?
     
    If he got hit by the front of the car, would he still be standing steady enough to fire 3 shots accurately and in quick succession?

    Have you ever seen a person struck by a car first hand? I have. The person was 3 feet away from me. The impact flung her onto the windshield, hit her head on the windshield, then rolled off the car. Then lying on the street, she foamed at the mouth for 10 minutes before the ambulance arrived. She died later in hospital.

    The ICE agent was certainly not struck by the car. If he did, the momentum from a 5000 pound SUV would have sent him flying. After he got to his feet again, it would have taken him yet more seconds to compose himself enough to shoot off a close 3 shot grouping on the windshield.

    Have you ever fired a rifle after physical activity, or urgent physical activity such as this? For example firing the rifle after one runs down 200 metres at the shooting range? One has to force himself to stay steady, compose himself and control his breath so that his breathing doesn't cause his rounds to fly all over the place.

    If the ICE agent had really been struck by the car, he would not have fired his shots so soon, and his shots would have been far more erratic than that.

    Replies: @Rich, @wojtek

    Look, the video shows him being struck by the car. If that’s not enough for you guys, nothing is. You just want, or need, to believe that this woman was killed in cold blood. I’m sure you were all-in on hands up, knee on neck, out getting skittles, too. If you can’t see the agent getting hit in the video, there’s just nothing else to argue about. You live in an alternate reality.

    • Replies: @Rurik
    @Rich


    If you can’t see the agent getting hit in the video, there’s just nothing else to argue about. You live in an alternate reality.
     
    you're right about the skittles and the knee-jerk sympathies of the ((media))

    and yes, I can see where he was struck by the vehicle, but I'll give you my take on that, fwiw.

    He could see that the other agent was ordering the provocateur out of her vehicle. He understood, as we all do, that in situations like that, there is the possibility that the person may try to gun the gas, and flee the scene, and so I think he positioned himself at the front of her SUV, to block her from leaving, but he did so in such a way that he could both, shoot her, if she tried to leave, but also in such a way as to allow himself to move out of the way, if she continued to drive away.

    Because he was at the corner of her vehicle, and not directly in front of it, when she gunned the gas, I don't think he was in imminent danger, I suspect his position was deliberate and calculated to give him a pretext for deadly force, while also allowing him to avoid serious injury to himself.

    That, fwiw, it how it all looks to me.

    If so, I suppose the shooting was not justified, if I'm right about what happened. But then I have no way of knowing if that's what he was doing, or what was going through his mind.

    But this issue is far, far wider than just that person's death.

    This country is at war. We saw that with the BLM rioters, burning and looting and murdering, to the indifference of our nation's highest law enforcement, and support of the media, ('mostly peaceful protests, blah, blah).

    In a way, this shooting is like Kyle Rittenhouse, with the people who were supporting Kyle, being the people who now support the ICE agent, because these are the 'law and order' people, who don't approve of burning and looting, just as now they don't approve of a lawless, open border.

    Vs. those who supported the BLM rioters, and now support the ICE protesters, because this country is 'racist', blah, blah.. and so the BLM rioters were the good guys, and the ICE protesters are the good guys, and when they block vehicles, they're doing good. But if an ICE agent blocks a vehicle, he's bad.

    There are very few people who are utterly objective about what happened. It's all relative, and all depends on their respective perspectives, and sympathies.

    Replies: @Rich

    , @littlereddot
    @Rich


    Look, the video shows him being struck by the car.
     
    LOL.

    A friend of mine was convicted of assault on a police officer some years back. Do you know what she did?

    She was stopped by a police woman for a minor violation like not wearing a seat belt. After being handed a written citation, my friend crushed the citation and threw it out the window, while muttering something like "You guys have nothing better to do. Go catch some speeding car or some robbers, but instead you catch an old lady for not wearing a seatbelt". Maybe the balled up citation touched the police woman. But she in court she testified that the ball of paper hit her and caused her injury.

    It is clear that the only thing damaged in the encounter was the policewoman's ego for not being shown sufficient deference.

    My friend was lucky she was stopped by ICE agents. She would have been shot for sure.

    Replies: @Same old same old

    , @Joe Levantine
    @Rich

    “ You live in an alternate reality.”

    In the world of AI, we have to accept that we all live in an alternate reality. The comments of littlereddot cast a real shadow of doubt over the authenticity of the video.

    If the video is real, then all we can say is that she got what she deserved.

    Unfortunately, this is not the first time that we see American security forces act in an unhinged way. In contrast, I remember the German policemen pointing his gun at the Iraqi who charged his car into the Christmas market last year. The restraint of the German policeman was outstanding, yelling on the man to leave his car for more than one minute without shooting. That I consider to be a security agent acting with restraint.

  • @Ron Unz
    @Punch Brother Punch


    I don’t know if anyone has posted this here yet, but the video in this tweet, which looks like it was taken from one of the nearby yards, clearly shows the vehicle striking the officer, quite hard.
     
    I'll admit I haven't really paid much to these "battling videos" on the Internet but looking at the one you posted, I'm pretty sure it's totally misleading.

    One of the shows I watched---it might have been the Napolitano interview with Greenwald that I embedded in my article above---actually featured exactly that video clip, saying that it certainly seemed to show that the ICE officer had been struck.

    But then they showed another video clip taken from a different angle, and it showed that the car never touched the ICE agent. They probably went over 5 or 6 different video clips, and the NYT compilation did as well, and all of the material seemed to solidly confirm that (A) the ICE agent was never touched and (B) that the woman was definitely trying to avoid him as she started to drive off.

    If you haven't already done so, you really should watch a couple of those videos I'd embedded since they went over all this stuff in a great deal of detail.

    But like I said, I haven't been paying much attention to this controversy, so if you watch those videos, you might come to different conclusions.

    Replies: @Rich

    There are no “battling videos”. There are several different angles showing the agent in front of the vehicle being struck. It’s disingenuous to claim the proof in front of everyone’s eyes isn’t real. The agent is clearly struck, the hole in the windshield is from the front. Why is there even an argument about this?

    Napolitano, and most of his guests, have gone completely off the rails in the quest for more clicks. They’ve been wrong on every prediction they make and are now outright lying about facts they don’t like. But that seems to be the norm now, as can be seen in the comments here where video showing the agent being struck is dismissed because it doesn’t fit the narrative. Hands up, knee on neck, skittles land.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
    @Rich


    There are no “battling videos”. There are several different angles showing the agent in front of the vehicle being struck. It’s disingenuous to claim the proof in front of everyone’s eyes isn’t real. The agent is clearly struck, the hole in the windshield is from the front. Why is there even an argument about this?
     
    Well, I think there are something like 5-6 different videos, all taken from different angles.

    The one you highlight appears to show that the car hit the ICE agent, which seems rather implausible since he afterwards showed not the slightest sign of any physical injury. But because of the positioning of the camera, what actually happened is far from clear.

    Meanwhile, all the other videos taken from different angles seem to show that the car never touched him.

    Naturally, you and all the ignorant Trumpists promote the one apparently misleading video and ignore all the others.

    Like I said, I haven't been paying much attention to those details or analyzing the various videos. I'm not all that interested in the topic.

    But for those who are, I'd just recommended that they watch some of the different videos and make up their own minds. I think they where included included in those much longer YouTube and Twitter videos that I'd embedded in my article.

    Replies: @Rich, @Anonymous

  • @Poupon Marx
    @Leif

    See my comments as taken from a video by Alex Krainer, on reply to Ron Unz. The role of Britain's league and assurances to Germany were instrumental in the Mentally Disordered Former Corporal's manic kinetic dispositions at conquest.

    The larger question is what national interest could Britain have had in promoting, clandestinely, German military strength??? The best answer is that the secret support for Germany's romp and stomp through Central Europe was part of a bigger plan, a plan that was largely driven by the {{{Hidden Hand}}} that reconciles the evidence and actions and motives. To the {{{Clandestine Force In The Shadow}}} the larger, meta-plan of various pieces was coming together. Britain further weakened and made easier to dominate, Hitler destroying the Continent. And finally, no matter which way the War went, the establishment and funding for Israel to be realized.

    The vast amount of new wealth made by ZIDSO, Zionist International Deep State Oligarchs, just as in WW I and the Napoleonic Wars was truly immense. Who finances these wars???
    And bonus points!!: Everyone is made weaker, assets are sold at fire sale prices, and reconstruction is undertaken by Guess Who Owns The Relevant Assets and Has The Financing??

    Western Whites are truly pathetic, brain [long term memory and contradiction resolution] damaged. There was a movie about a girl, played by Drew Barrymore, who lost her memory every night, and woke the next day knowing nothing.

    When Buddha said, "Everything is impermanence", he was referring to the Outer World, the Collective Consciousness, not the Inner Consciousness. The Inner Consciousness, aware or unaware, is constant. The World is created and comes out of the Inner Conscious.

    I will post a video as reference to why Adolph HAD to promote war.

    Replies: @Truth Vigilante

    I will post a video as reference to why Adolph HAD to promote war.

    Poupy, I can’t understand how, on the one hand you acknowledge the existence of the Zionist International Deep State Oligarchs (aka ZOG), and the degree of death and depravity they cause, and yet, for some unfathomable reason, you can’t see that Malignant International Jewry manoeuvred/intimidated/bribed western politicians and other heads of state to create the circumstances that would INEVITABLY lead to WWII* – with the express intention of destroying NSDAP Germany.

    (*In fact this is just as true in relation to the circumstances relating to the outbreak of WWI).

    Adolf Hitler had the FORESIGHT to see what was being done to Germany many years before becoming Chancellor. In accordance with that knowledge, he armed his nation in advance as a means of countering what he knew was coming.
    Absent all the Jewish chicanery, there WOULD HAVE BEEN NO OUTBREAK OF WWII (at least not between Germany and the western powers).

    But, seeing as Stalin sought the conquest of western Europe and the expansion of the Soviet Empire, war with the Jewish Bolshevik evil empire could not be avoided.
    So Hitler did what was necessary to secure the safety and future prosperity of the Deutsches Volk as best he could.

    Got it now Poupy? Do you understand the correlation between Cause and Effect?

    Malignant International Jewry’s number one priority, as early as the late 19th/early 20th century, was the elimination and subjugation of a rival hegemon to the Anglo-Zionist empire.
    Germany was that up and coming Industrial Colossus that, left unchecked, could become the preeminent economic power on the planet.

    (Hitler saw what was being done to his nation during WWI, and it was doubly reinforced by the continuation of the post Armistice blockade of food supplies that resulted in countless hundreds of thousands of fellow Germans starving for nothing).

    If that wasn’t proof enough, we have the unjust and crushing provisions/reparations imposed by the Treaty of Versailles.
    ALL OF THIS made it evident that the Talmudic misfits wanted to pummel Germany into the turf once and for all.

    In other words, all of the above came FIRST, and Hitler’s efforts to ensure the security of his nation (through a military build up), came SECOND.

    Poupy, on some issues you’re very well informed indeed.
    But as far as WWII is concerned, you’ve been thoroughly duped by the Jewish propaganda.
    You’ve swallowed the near entirety of their B.S by watching the ZOG controlled History Channel and endless reruns of Swindlers List.

    You are BADLY in need of an education on WWII – because right now you are clueless.
    You would do well do re-read all of the articles on this conflict and on the Holohoax posted by Ron Unz over the years. That will get you up to speed.

    And last, but certainly most, you need to read all of John Wear’s brilliant book ‘Germany’s War’.
    (Which you can read in this webzine for free – due to Mr Unz’s magnanimity in paying John Wear for the rights to publish his book here):
    https://www.unz.com/book/john_wear__germanys-war/

    • Thanks: Rurik
    • Replies: @Poupon Marx
    @Truth Vigilante

    Thank you for the compliments, but we continue to disagree on WWII and your, in my opinion, foggy lens, limited information, immutable infatuation, and dearth of contrary updates and different perspectives on one Adolph Coors Hitleer.

    Some of your positions and opinions I agree with, but I notice you display ideological and rigidity one certain issues that speak not well of an open mind. Most people of this nature and suasion are statically inclined due to personality quirks and structural weaknesses. IOW, their particular constellation of related beliefs is a crutch and main beam or post of their personality, Ego, Psyche, and many time of Persona.

    There is almost a desperation of connotation, a plea it seems, in your sales pitch to see Adolph Coors as a noble figure, to be admired, and worshipped.

    Please see my two extended reply comments under Ron Unz. Best to click on my moniker, sometimes twice, to bring up a list of my recent comments. My opinion is based on Alex Kainer's presentation, which is derived from three books cited, his reputation, and the sum total of my apprehension of sources pertaining to one pot bellied corporal with severe mental health issues.

    Please see also my interpretation and presentation of an evaluation of Heetleer by Carl Gustav Jung prior to WWII. I trust your educational and self-tuition background and cover can handle the concepts and contracts therein.

    Replies: @Pierre de Craon

    , @Poupon Marx
    @Truth Vigilante

    Most discussions of WWII have degenerated to mere narratives and memes. They also are repetitive, low on verifiable evidence, and "out of the box search and consideration". That requires individual relentless curiosity.

    On my own, I often wondered how Hitler financed so much of a military, social, and public works without concomitant trade increases. I had commented on this using discovered sources, earlier this year, I believe. [Much of your opinions and comments were countered by me and others in previous posts. That's why I encourage you to read my comments regularly]

    Please read the following intrepid report that transgresses cliches, and trite tread worn material.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPyoySkefLs&t=2230s

    Replies: @Truth Vigilante