Doesn't appear she had any previous felony convictions.
She was no felon.
https://www.birdsall-law.com/legal-implications-of-interfering-with-immigration-enforcementReplies: @Same old same old, @Ron Unz
1. Obstruction of Justice: Under federal law, obstructing an officer in the performance of their official duties is a serious offense. This includes actions such as physically blocking ICE agents, providing false information, or using intimidation to prevent an arrest. Depending on the circumstances, individuals could face misdemeanor or felony charges, leading to fines and potential jail time.
However, what she was doing (blocking ICE vehicles/officers with her car when they are trying to detain someone) appears to be a crime:
I really haven’t followed the details of the case, but is that correct? Wasn’t she “a legal observer,” intending to provide advice to protestors who might be arrested? From the videos, it’s not clear to me that she was actually blocking anything where she was parked.
Hmm…
The one you highlight appears to show that the car hit the ICE agent, which seems rather implausible since he afterwards showed not the slightest sign of any physical injury. But because of the positioning of the camera, what actually happened is far from clear.
Wait, we need a second opinion! Please forward those CT scans to our resident armchair biomechanical/accident reconstruction expert to examine… from his armchair!
ICE agent who shot Renee Good suffered internal bleeding, officials say
By Nicole Sganga, Jennifer Jacobs
Updated on: January 14, 2026
The Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent who fatally shot Renee Good last week in Minneapolis, Jonathan Ross, suffered internal bleeding to the torso following the incident, according to two U.S. officials briefed on his medical condition…
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ice-officer-who-shot-renee-good-internal-injuries-sources-say/
Replies: @Antiwar7, @Truth Vigilante, @Ron Unz
https://static01.nyt.com/images/2016/01/14/us/15harvard-web1/15harvard-web1-superJumbo.jpg
The Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent who fatally shot Renee Good last week in Minneapolis, Jonathan Ross, suffered internal bleeding to the torso following the incident, according to two U.S. officials briefed on his medical condition
When “anonymous government officials” say something about Iraqi WMDs or ICE agent injuries, I’m skeptical.
Like I’ve saying all along, although there’s one blurry video taken from one side that seems to show the SUV striking the ICE agent, there were several other videos I saw taken from the other side that seemed to show it missing him. People should watch all the different videos together and make up their own minds.
However, it’s absolutely undeniable that the ICE agent was casually walking around afterwards, showing not the slightest sign of any pain or injury. If he’d actually been hit by the SUV hard enough to cause internal bleeding, that seems extremely unlikely to me.
If those claims—mostly by “anonymous government officials”—were true, why not release the medical records, CT scans, and X-rays? Is there anything deeply confidential about a CT scan or an X-ray?
The Trump officials like Kristi Noem all immediately declared the victim “a domestic terrorist.” I strongly suspect that the claims about internal bleeding and injuries are about as realistic and accurate accurate.
You are right. Poland is far funnier than the USSR.
Don’t you worry little red troll, the only shortcoming of his description of the USSR is that people might think it was somewhat funny. It wasn’t. Everything else is spot on.
Q: How do you know you’re flying over Poland?
A: Toilet paper hanging on the clotheslines.
Is that what the poorly educated chinese (the ones who don’t know what momentum is 🙂 ) do these days? Project their own experiences onto a country they never saw? 🙂 That’s actually a coping mechanism. Not a good one, but whatever works for your tired little brain, my little red chink 🙂
At some point the whole system became a joke. But I promise you it wasn’t funny even then, and at first there weren’t even any jokes.
Great article Ron with great links to follow up.
We are truly living in dystopian nightmare heading towards a Soviet style gulag.
Trumps comments about being controlled by his own morality only are truly shocking and show the depth of his ignorance about the limits of presidential power. He has become comparable to Caligula as you mentioned in a previous article.
The power of ICE and its position as storm troopers/pretorian guard of the regime is truly frightening.
Agent struck by a 5000 pound SUV, and he is still standing, not flung to the ground, and is somehow and steady and composed enough to shoot 3 rounds into the woman?
Even with the release of the video showing the agent being struck by the suv,
Not sure I understand you.
even with the video showing her staring directly at the agent she hit,
And these people are eligible to vote and sit on juries. No wonder everything just keeps getting worse in this country.In this I agree with you.
You, sir, are an example of what I was writing. The video is available, showing him get struck by the suv, and you still argue he wasn’t hit. Your mind can’t accept reality. Nothing can be done for you. Good luck in your future endeavors.
Even with the release of the video showing the agent being struck by the suv,
Agent struck by a 5000 pound SUV, and he is still standing, not flung to the ground, and is somehow and steady and composed enough to shoot 3 rounds into the woman?
even with the video showing her staring directly at the agent she hit,
Not sure I understand you.
Was she staring at the agent with the bullets in her?
Or did she stare at the agent before she allegedly hit him?
And these people are eligible to vote and sit on juries. No wonder everything just keeps getting worse in this country.
In this I agree with you.
Only my definition of “these people” is the opposite of yours.
New Republic of Formosa.
Sorry to burst your bubble. Republic of China is hard written into their constitution.
Don’t you worry little red troll, the only shortcoming of his description of the USSR is that people might think it was somewhat funny. It wasn’t. Everything else is spot on.
You are right. Poland is far funnier than the USSR.
~64
Q: How do you know you’re flying over Poland?
A: Toilet paper hanging on the clotheslines.
Is that what the poorly educated chinese (the ones who don't know what momentum is :) ) do these days? Project their own experiences onto a country they never saw? :) That's actually a coping mechanism. Not a good one, but whatever works for your tired little brain, my little red chink :)
Q: How do you know you’re flying over Poland?
A: Toilet paper hanging on the clotheslines.
These little chinese red trolls are getting more and more dumb by the minute.
If he did, the momentum from a 5000 pound SUV would have sent him flying.
FYI, momentum is mass times velocity. Go back to school.
LOL, obviously you don’t understand English as well as you think you do.
The word momentum has been in use far longer than it has been used in the modern scientific sense.
Your are like an idiot saying “a cuttlefish is not a fish. A fish has scales and rayed-fins”
This idiot can only understand the word “fish” from the modern scientific definition. He doesn’t realise that for centuries prior, the word fish meant “an animal that lives in the water”. That is why you have shellfish, starfish, jellyfish etc.
Your schooling has obviously not been completed yet, dumb Polack.
Gdańsk
Danzig has a much better ring to it.
The Germans were there long before the Poles.
Over 500 comments and the people who thought the agent shot her from the side, through the driver’s side window still believe that. Even with the release of the video showing the agent being struck by the suv, even with the video showing her staring directly at the agent she hit, even with photos available showing the bullet hole in the front windshield. It’s crazy. And these people are eligible to vote and sit on juries. No wonder everything just keeps getting worse in this country. Crazy.
Agent struck by a 5000 pound SUV, and he is still standing, not flung to the ground, and is somehow and steady and composed enough to shoot 3 rounds into the woman?
Even with the release of the video showing the agent being struck by the suv,
Not sure I understand you.
even with the video showing her staring directly at the agent she hit,
And these people are eligible to vote and sit on juries. No wonder everything just keeps getting worse in this country.In this I agree with you.
I'll admit I'd never remotely considered that possibility. I'm not "conspiratorial" enough to necessarily accept it, but it's an interesting idea nonetheless.
Anglin is right about ICE. Its real target is the white male pro constitutional, pro 1st and pro second and pro fifth amendment libertarian US citizen population. I’ll explain.
First, the murder of Ms. Good was a planned mafia style hit. Check my link below from 2014...
The idiot libs calling this guy stupid and untrained don’t recognize his skill as a mafia style ice assassin.
They also think he was ‘angry’ at being taunted by the victim’s ‘wife’. Not at all, he was happy he had even more cover for his cold blooded crime...
The response by Krisi Noem and Trump was obviously scripted IN ADVANCE; They were ready immediately with the marketing style framing. They’ve probably tested this framing with focus groups already.
Immediately the hired influencers mentioned above, Fuentes, Walsh, Pool and more provide MAGA with the proper response. And the dummy MAGA whites eat it up, just like they followed Fuentes on Jan 6 while he kept his pansy ass safe, because they are dummies and easily manipulated via their low self esteem as dummy whites who can’t deal with women as non subservient and while wanting to be the boss they are too dumb or lazy to get the diploma or training to qualify for being the boss. lumpen proletariat they used to call them, right?
Meanwhile the Jewish controlled state apparatus has created the situation and the precedent. Strategy of Tension. It’s in the handbook. The dummy whites led by paid influencers will cheer on the increase of state repression giving it legitimacy. The intelligent constitutional whites will at some point resist as they become the target. Suddenly the script will flip and an incident will provide the excuse to go after the most effective group of resistors, the constitutional whites who are not dummies, who work, own businesses, have skills and education BUT do not accept a complete Jewish/Zionist/Banker takeover of their country. Then the culling of white men will begin in earnest, just like it has in Ukraine.
‘…she was a liberal lesbian “poet”…’
So grateful for your literary criticism here.
>”They Have It. We Want It. We Take It.”
What about illegal immigrants in this context?
It’s obviously not a perfect analogy, but vis-a-vis ‘not having, wanting, and taking’, it’s not totally inapt either — as a class (think class action lawsuit), don’t illegal immigrants see something they ‘don’t have’, but ‘want’, namely residence in the US, the benefits of living in the US (among white people, incidentally), or maybe the right to live in the US, and then don’t they ‘take’ what they ‘want’? — don’t they arrogate the right to live in the US?
In the short bio you post (with a very outdated foto), it says you ran for governor ‘on a conservative, pro-immigrant platform’, and ‘campaigned as a leading opponent of Prop. 187′, which you dishonestly describe as an ‘anti-immigration initiative’ (Prop 187 was about providing state services to illegal immigrants; California voters could not affect federal immigration law).
At the least it seems you were willing to tolerate ‘not having, wanting, and taking’ by illegal immigrants — perhaps you saw nothing wrong with it at all.
Prop 187 may have been an ‘anti-immigration initiative’ to some, but its specific intent was to ‘deny access to social services, non-emergency health services, and public education’ to illegal immigrants, which was not unreasonable (denying public education clashed with the 1982 Supreme Court decision in Plyer v. Doe).
So while not necessarily defending anything Trump is doing, regarding ‘not having, wanting, and taking’, this looks like hypocrisy on your part Unz — have your views about that changed?
Thanks once more returned.
I feel like Dante as he and Virgil spiral downward on their tour if the Inferno. I feel increasingly disconnected from the public Clown Show that calls itself “American politics”. I see Trump, held down by demons as molten gold is poured down his throat.
I shrink back in horror: “O, woeful sight! What can be the extent of this man’s crimes?” Virgil: “Posing as a champion of the people, he attained the highest office only to become the vassal of a foreign prince, all in return for gold.”
He deserves to be thrown out of office. Of course, the Democrats will then resume their project of destroying the country, all with the usual “good intentions” of the clueless reformer.
“ You live in an alternate reality.”
In the world of AI, we have to accept that we all live in an alternate reality. The comments of littlereddot cast a real shadow of doubt over the authenticity of the video.
If the video is real, then all we can say is that she got what she deserved.
Unfortunately, this is not the first time that we see American security forces act in an unhinged way. In contrast, I remember the German policemen pointing his gun at the Iraqi who charged his car into the Christmas market last year. The restraint of the German policeman was outstanding, yelling on the man to leave his car for more than one minute without shooting. That I consider to be a security agent acting with restraint.
^I think that's probably the truest thing that's been said in this entire thread of comments and in the larger national media discussion.
Yeah, I don’t think I’ve seen a single take on this that didn’t align with the person’s preexisting views on ICE, mine included.
It's a generally rare thing, and a case-by-case thing. I assume Renee Good's estate will have the right to sue ICE here, and they will probably win a few million bucks.
If you don’t want to risk your life, then don’t fuck with the police. Don’t insert yourself in a law enforcement situation
^Another good point.
I’m more concerned about having no immigration enforcement than I am about the remote possibility that it could be turned against Americans.
Trump ran 3 times on solving this immigration issue and its the only reason he ever became President.
Well …. NO …. in fact. That was a peripheral issue for many voters.
While campaigning in 2016, Donald Chump said:
1) That he’d appoint a Special Prosecutor immediately upon becoming Prez, to investigate Hillary.
2) That he’d look into 9/11 and tell is ‘who really did it’ (and release the entirety of the JFK files).
3) That he’d sit down with Putin and try to negotiate with him, to deescalate the tensions.
4) That he’d stop with the ‘stupid wars’
5) That he’d build a wall on the southern border and get the Mexicans to pay for it.
And … much more.
Well then Mr Garrulous, how did all that work out?
The Orange baboon did not keep a single promise.
Meanwhile, if I was eligible to vote in U.S elections and was inclined to vote, my NUMBER ONE reason for voting for Donald Chump would be for his pledge to REINVESTIGATE 9/11.
Because, as Christopher Bollyn says:
SOLVING 9/11 ENDS THE WARS.
Did you comprehend that Greg Garrulous?
Solving 9/11 entails:
If the “Europeans” were in any way shape or form European they´d grok the
keeheefjews are bombing them, at the behest of the Great Satan, and stomp
them out instead of offering Greenland (and Iceland; and …).
Your video is over two hours long.
So rather than watch all of it and risk brain impairment from hearing the tired old ZOG talking points repeated for the umpteenth time, I just skimmed through it.
And, as is customary for the more sophisticated propaganda, whilst it draws on actual facts in its explanations, it then extrapolates the wrong conclusions – by making assumptions that fit in with the ‘demonisation of Hitler and the NSDAP’ agenda.
Poupy, seriously, you are in desperate need of some tough love.
I can’t help but laugh when you hand out advice to me and others, telling us to be more ‘open minded’ and not set in our ways.
That really cracks me up when I hear that coming from you.
You see, and I know a ton of the UR readership will agree, there is no one whose views are MORE SET IN STONE than yours.
I’ve suggested (for your benefit), that you read all of John Wear’s world class book ‘Germany’s War’.
I even graciously provided the link* for you in previous UR threads that you were engaged in.
(*For the benefit of UR readers who want to learn TRUE WWII history, authored by a colossus of integrity, click on the link below):
https://www.unz.com/book/john_wear__germanys-war/
But did you read it? Did you attempt to read one of the chapters?
(I suspect you haven’t looked at a single page).
And you likely won’t attempt to, because it will eviscerate your cartoonish/ZOG inspired depiction of how WWII transpired and shatter your illusions.
Yes, John Wear’s book (accompanied by countless hundreds – if not 1000’s – of citations and footnotes which comprehensively back up his claims), will turn your world upside down.
I suspect that you’re too afraid to risk the likelihood that you’ll be forced to leave your cocooned little world of Mass Formation Psychosis, the one that reinforces your present flawed belief system on historical matters.
Unlike you, I go out of my way in attempting to falsify my preconceptions on various issues, be that on 9/11, the murders of JFK/RFK/JFK Jr, the Covid Psyop, the alleged Anthropogenic Global Warming or whatever.
And along the way I’ve had to amend, and at times discard completely, those beliefs I had that no longer withstood scrutiny.
And I FEEL BETTER for having done that – because by doing so I inch closer to the truth.
You on the other hand, do NOT seek out the truth.
What you do seek out is CONFIRMATION BIAS. You only seek out those questionable (often ZOG funded/affiliated) sources that confirm what you were told as a kid.
ie: that those dastardly Germans invaded ‘us peaceful Greeks’ (you did mention this was your ethnic background as I recall).
And thus you will never entertain the possibility that the Germans (when viewed as a collective), were anything other than evil.
And that they, and they ALONE, are entirely responsible for the commencement of WWII.
Summary: No Nation, No Regime, is ever entirely bad or entirely good.
You will find countless examples of evil deeds to demonise whatever nation/regime that you choose to put under the microscope. There’s always dirt we can dig out about them.
But, using any honest metric you choose to apply, you will soon determine that:The crimes of the Anglo-Zionist empire alone (during WWII and in the immediate post war years), were perhaps an ORDER OF MAGNITUDE MORE HEINOUS, both in qualitative and quantitative terms, than anything the Germans did during WWII.
If we were to then add the crimes of the Judeo-Bolshevik Soviet empire with Stalin at the helm (ie: initiatives the latter undertook that were directly responsible for the loss of millions of Soviet citizens and millions more of Soviet POW’s – through his Scorched Earth Policies and other heavy handedness), then the disparity blows out further still.
And one last thing that you (and others in this webzine) refuse to accept:
There is NO QUESTION that Hitler and the Third Reich came the closest of all to bringing about the demise of ZOG.
Unfortunately he was unsuccessful.
Because the ZOG miscreants manipulated the Allied nations and the Judeo-Bolshevik Soviet Union into sacrificing their blood and treasure by siding with them.
If you or your forebears are advocating against Hitler and NSDAP Germany, then ipso facto you are ALIGNING WITH ZOG.
It’s that simple. No need to complicate matters.
The stupid Serbs sided with ZOG in two World Wars.
The gullible Poles sided with ZOG by accepting the assurances of FDR and ZOG controlled Gross Britain.
You stupid Greeks likewise made the worst possible choice.
ZOG emerged victorious from WWII. The rest of us lost – although to varying degrees.
What is happening to the U.S today, in western Europe, Australia where I live and elsewhere, is a direct consequence of siding with EVIL in both WWI & II.
That is the reality.
Yes, but on the other hand, there were much more jokes in those days. The whole Poland was a joke (at least for a Western tourist) with those tiny cars and money exchangers catching you already on the airport.
Do you really expect me to feel bad about some dumb roastie getting domed for physically putting herself in between federal law enforcement and the deportation of Somalian career criminals?Replies: @nokangaroos
A few days ago, a far deadlier ICE incident involving the death of a native-born American citizen reached the national headlines.
Large numbers of ICE agents had been deployed to Minneapolis, arousing strong opposition from local liberal activists, one of them being a blond 37-year-old mother of three.
For many generations, white, middle-class Americans have been raised lacking any serious fear of the police. That was certainly the case with the victim as she sat in her parked SUV on the suburban streets of her own city, serving as a legal observer responsible for providing advice to any demonstrators who might be arrested. Some video clips show her treating the nearby ICE troopers with lighthearted scorn, casually ridiculing their activities, which surely must have enraged those militarized federal officers clad in tactical gear.
The rough sequence of events is clear. She was approached by several of those masked, armed ICE agents who tried to pull her out of her vehicle, so she apparently became alarmed and decided to drive away. This in turn seems to have alarmed one of those ICE agents, who shot her three times in the head, killing her. A few moments earlier, her last words to that ICE officer had been “I ain’t mad at you, dude,” while after firing the fatal shots he can be heard to say “Fucking bitch.”
The pass-for-white psycho dyke obstructing justice is a metaphor:
The sense of impunity they cannot lose will be the downfall of all Americans.
If he got hit by the front of the car, would he still be standing steady enough to fire 3 shots accurately and in quick succession?Have you ever seen a person struck by a car first hand? I have. The person was 3 feet away from me. The impact flung her onto the windshield, hit her head on the windshield, then rolled off the car. Then lying on the street, she foamed at the mouth for 10 minutes before the ambulance arrived. She died later in hospital.The ICE agent was certainly not struck by the car. If he did, the momentum from a 5000 pound SUV would have sent him flying. After he got to his feet again, it would have taken him yet more seconds to compose himself enough to shoot off a close 3 shot grouping on the windshield.Have you ever fired a rifle after physical activity, or urgent physical activity such as this? For example firing the rifle after one runs down 200 metres at the shooting range? One has to force himself to stay steady, compose himself and control his breath so that his breathing doesn't cause his rounds to fly all over the place.If the ICE agent had really been struck by the car, he would not have fired his shots so soon, and his shots would have been far more erratic than that.Replies: @Rich, @wojtek
How did he get hit by the front of the car and fire through the windshield?
If he did, the momentum from a 5000 pound SUV would have sent him flying.
These little chinese red trolls are getting more and more dumb by the minute.
FYI, momentum is mass times velocity. Go back to school.
LOL, obviously you don't understand English as well as you think you do.
FYI, momentum is mass times velocity. Go back to school.
Hmm…
The one you highlight appears to show that the car hit the ICE agent, which seems rather implausible since he afterwards showed not the slightest sign of any physical injury. But because of the positioning of the camera, what actually happened is far from clear.
Wait, we need a second opinion! Please forward those CT scans to our resident armchair biomechanical/accident reconstruction expert to examine… from his armchair!
ICE agent who shot Renee Good suffered internal bleeding, officials say
By Nicole Sganga, Jennifer Jacobs
Updated on: January 14, 2026
The Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent who fatally shot Renee Good last week in Minneapolis, Jonathan Ross, suffered internal bleeding to the torso following the incident, according to two U.S. officials briefed on his medical condition…
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ice-officer-who-shot-renee-good-internal-injuries-sources-say/
Replies: @Antiwar7, @Truth Vigilante, @Ron Unz
https://static01.nyt.com/images/2016/01/14/us/15harvard-web1/15harvard-web1-superJumbo.jpg
ICE agent who shot Renee Good suffered internal bleeding, officials say
What ‘officials’ said that?
Oh, you mean the same officials in the U.S Health bureaucracy that said the Covid vaxxes were ‘safe and effective’?
Or was it the same bunch of officials that said, in the aftermath of the 9/11 False Flag, that WTC7’s demise was due to ‘office fires’?
(Even though it was not impacted by a plane).
The reality is that Building 7 had experienced negligible damage due to falling debris from WTC 1 & 2. It had the most minor of fires on floors 12 and 13 (which extinguished on their own after a short duration),.
Yet it collapsed in what was clearly a textbook perfect example of controlled demolition on the day of 9/11?
Donald Chump’s Gubmint and conscience-free goons will conjure up whatever falsehood was necessary to cover for this cold-blooded murder.
Soon enough they’ll say this ICE agent is afflicted with PTSD, that he also got bone spurs and toe nail nail fungus from the incident, and that he’s suffering terribly.
(esp. from the taunts he endures when wearing Open Toe sandals in public).
And soon thereafter they’ll set up a GoFundMe platform to raise money for the poor dear.
Nony-mouse, you’re a dupe if you believe what any U.S Gubmint administration (esp. Donald Chump’s clearly unhinged administration and its various agencies), are telling you about ANYTHING.
IMHO, this comment makes Mr. Unz's article and analysis irrelevant.
Is Trump really different from his predecessors? Did George W. respect any laws, including the UN Charter? Bush was worse than Trump. Bush is a mass murderer. The war on terror and the criminal invasion of Iraq were history’s most barbaric crimes. Before Bush, there was Bill Clinton, who was a monstrous criminal. The deliberate murder of over 600,000 Iraqi children under the age of five years was Clinton’s trademark of mass murder. Clinton bombed Iraq almost weekly for eight years. His Secretary of State, the Jew Madeleine Albright, called it a “price worth it.” Every American president repeated the same mantra: “America is exceptional” and needs no law. If there is any justice, every American president should be in prison for committing heinous war crimes. Trump is no different.
Agree! Well said. It takes time and efforts to produce a “product”, any product.
In a sense, the MFOB is proclaiming itself to be a “god”: the creature publicly claims to reign over the whole world (gods aren’t limited by geography); it exercises the power of life and death over many people; it can and does reward people with whom it finds favor while its enemies experience its wrath; it can apparently do whatever it wants, limited only by its own moral compunction (of which it has none); it seeks and (according to itself) deserves constant “worship”; it “creates” (or at least wants its name on everything), and it demands unquestioning faith from its disciples, etc.
A few days ago, a far deadlier ICE incident involving the death of a native-born American citizen reached the national headlines.
Large numbers of ICE agents had been deployed to Minneapolis, arousing strong opposition from local liberal activists, one of them being a blond 37-year-old mother of three.
For many generations, white, middle-class Americans have been raised lacking any serious fear of the police. That was certainly the case with the victim as she sat in her parked SUV on the suburban streets of her own city, serving as a legal observer responsible for providing advice to any demonstrators who might be arrested. Some video clips show her treating the nearby ICE troopers with lighthearted scorn, casually ridiculing their activities, which surely must have enraged those militarized federal officers clad in tactical gear.
The rough sequence of events is clear. She was approached by several of those masked, armed ICE agents who tried to pull her out of her vehicle, so she apparently became alarmed and decided to drive away. This in turn seems to have alarmed one of those ICE agents, who shot her three times in the head, killing her. A few moments earlier, her last words to that ICE officer had been “I ain’t mad at you, dude,” while after firing the fatal shots he can be heard to say “Fucking bitch.”
Do you really expect me to feel bad about some dumb roastie getting domed for physically putting herself in between federal law enforcement and the deportation of Somalian career criminals?
LOL.A friend of mine was convicted of assault on a police officer some years back. Do you know what she did? She was stopped by a police woman for a minor violation like not wearing a seat belt. After being handed a written citation, my friend crushed the citation and threw it out the window, while muttering something like "You guys have nothing better to do. Go catch some speeding car or some robbers, but instead you catch an old lady for not wearing a seatbelt". Maybe the balled up citation touched the police woman. But she in court she testified that the ball of paper hit her and caused her injury.It is clear that the only thing damaged in the encounter was the policewoman's ego for not being shown sufficient deference.My friend was lucky she was stopped by ICE agents. She would have been shot for sure.Replies: @Same old same old
Look, the video shows him being struck by the car.
I have had my own encounters with the badged thugs roaming our streets. I suppose it is beyond the typical maggot that most people don’t want to live in a country where they have to kiss the asses of public servants or risk being shot in the face.
Why were we supposed to be better than China or the USSR again?
David Irving has done so much good, he’s exhibited so much courage and sacrificed so much in pursuit of the truth (in other words he’s built up such a colossal reservoir of good deeds), that I’d pretty much forgive him no matter what he said.
I’d also factor in that he’s an old man who isn’t capable of much resistance in his present condition*.
(* I read recently that his health had turned for the worse and I fear he may not be with us for too much longer).
As for Jesse Ventura, I was aware of one or two things he’s done in recent times that left me shaking my head and thinking to myself:
‘They’ve gotten to him and that he’s succumbed to (((their))) threats/intimidation’.
But I wasn’t aware of those things you mentioned about him. Thanks for updating me.
Stop kidding around. The US satellites give real time intel on Russian air defenses for major targets so the drones can avoid these or spoof them. US satellites are much better at this than European ones.
You are speculating on what is provided by US satellites. Such capabilities are not known to the public.
What we do know is that:
1. Russian oil refinery locations are public information
2. The Russians are on video trying to defend the refineries with small arms fire
I can provide the video if you would like. The Russians are on video multiple times where they fill the air with small arms fire. That is much less advanced than the German flak cannons of WW2 as they were firing based on complex calculations.
If the Russians are shooting AK-47s at slow moving Ukrainian drones then there is no reason to assume that some US technology is required to attack the refineries.
I’m not being silly. Like other Russian sympathizers you are in denial of where Russia is at in the war. They do not have enough S-400s to defend all of their refineries. Ukraine continues to launch sorties using a combination of Migs and Western missiles. Funny a certain alt-right blogger at Unz told us that the Russia has total air superiority.
I guess not.
Having our Congress make a fuss over this entirely US-created Ukraine disaster would be enormously helpful by moving the needle of public opinion. That is why we say, “Write your Congressman!”.
Well the UN voted 143-5 that Russia is at fault and that 5 includes Russia, Belarus and North Korea.
Congress passed military aid under Biden and most of it has been sent. Ending the remaining aid would not end the war. Europe can fund Ukraine for two more years.
Oh yeah we heard about his morality.
THE EPSTEIN FILES
Do you mean the Republic of China?
Taiwan
Thats not a bad idea.
Yes, I think we should do this
You’re worrying way too much about Germanistan – I think you’re the only one 🙂
Focus on giving back Taiwan to the Japanese.
New Republic of Formosa.
Judging from the poor propaganda, I am starting to wonder if Chinese communism is as efficient as the Soviet one was. I’m curious if the new Japanese prime minister will test it. She seems to have balls.
Sorry to burst your bubble. Republic of China is hard written into their constitution.
New Republic of Formosa.
If you ask an Indian what Pakistan is really like, you will not get an accurate picture.
Soviet Union
Don’t you worry little red troll, the only shortcoming of his description of the USSR is that people might think it was somewhat funny. It wasn’t. Everything else is spot on.
You are right. Poland is far funnier than the USSR.
Don’t you worry little red troll, the only shortcoming of his description of the USSR is that people might think it was somewhat funny. It wasn’t. Everything else is spot on.
Look, the video shows him being struck by the car.
LOL.
A friend of mine was convicted of assault on a police officer some years back. Do you know what she did?
She was stopped by a police woman for a minor violation like not wearing a seat belt. After being handed a written citation, my friend crushed the citation and threw it out the window, while muttering something like “You guys have nothing better to do. Go catch some speeding car or some robbers, but instead you catch an old lady for not wearing a seatbelt”. Maybe the balled up citation touched the police woman. But she in court she testified that the ball of paper hit her and caused her injury.
It is clear that the only thing damaged in the encounter was the policewoman’s ego for not being shown sufficient deference.
My friend was lucky she was stopped by ICE agents. She would have been shot for sure.
The Last Jewish Gangster – Patrick Bet-David 2021
Myron Sugerman Discusses Jack Ruby’s Jewish Mafia Days, the JFK Assassination, and the Jewish Mafia’s Support of Israel
He fully confirms that Jack Ruby was a Jewish mobster, and he mentions Tibor Rosenbaum as well.
Myron Sugerman is like a walking advertisement for Michael Collins Piper’s book.
^I think that's probably the truest thing that's been said in this entire thread of comments and in the larger national media discussion.
Yeah, I don’t think I’ve seen a single take on this that didn’t align with the person’s preexisting views on ICE, mine included.
It's a generally rare thing, and a case-by-case thing. I assume Renee Good's estate will have the right to sue ICE here, and they will probably win a few million bucks.
If you don’t want to risk your life, then don’t fuck with the police. Don’t insert yourself in a law enforcement situation
^Another good point.
I’m more concerned about having no immigration enforcement than I am about the remote possibility that it could be turned against Americans.
I think Trump is a disaster, but there’s no evidence that this incident is anything other than ICE performing its legal duties —> ICE meets obstructionists/organized provocateurs —> Provocateurs go overboard. —> rogue ICE agent apparently goes overboard in response, resulting in tragedy.
That’s a grossly reductionist view of the matter.
See the following post upthread:
https://www.unz.com/runz/the-trump-doctrine-they-have-it-we-want-it-we-take-it/#comment-7457891
That federal rule change has enabled ICE to engage in conduct that would otherwise be described as flagrantly unconstitutional. As such, I find any effort to depict the conduct of ICE as ‘just performing its legal duties’ to be misleading, at best.
To be clear, I don’t encourage obstruction, yet Team Trump hasn’t done itself any favors by expanding police powers as they have, transforming erstwhile legally protected conduct into an arrestable offense. In so doing, they engender support for their opposition while seriously damaging their own.
Doesn't appear she had any previous felony convictions.
She was no felon.
https://www.birdsall-law.com/legal-implications-of-interfering-with-immigration-enforcementReplies: @Same old same old, @Ron Unz
1. Obstruction of Justice: Under federal law, obstructing an officer in the performance of their official duties is a serious offense. This includes actions such as physically blocking ICE agents, providing false information, or using intimidation to prevent an arrest. Depending on the circumstances, individuals could face misdemeanor or felony charges, leading to fines and potential jail time.
Being in a road an illegal federal militia wants to drive down is not a crime worthy of summary execution, you disgusting kike maggot.
I meant this as a rhetorical question, I was agreeing with you that it's a silly thing to ask.
Why didn’t the officer jump out of the way?
I don’t even think it matters much whether she meant to hit him or whether she did hit him. What matters is she forced him to make a split second decision by ramming an SUV in his face.
Weren’t you same ziokikes shouting “don’t stand in traffic” a few years ago? Fuck off, Hasbaras.
Soviet Union
If you ask an Indian what Pakistan is really like, you will not get an accurate picture.
If you ask an North Korean what South Korea is really like, you will not get an accurate picture.
If you ask an American what the USSR was really like, you will not get an accurate picture.
Trumpstein just announced his personal morality to be superior to any moral code in existence.
He is a tyrant, and has just bragged about it.
What person of that stature has your Orange Boogeyman targeted for disposal?
Seriously?
At issue here is the question of whether or not the monstrous fat orange bastard’s “outrageous and lawless things” can be deemed more “extreme” than the “outrageous and lawless things” done by his predecessors, and the contest isn’t even close: the fat orange bastard (i.e. trump) takes the prize. Obama was a piker compared to the MFOB.
First of all the scope of the “outrageous and lawless things” that Ron was referring to clearly involves much more than just assassinating any particular person. But being that you asked the question: “What person of that stature has your Orange Boogeyman targeted for disposal?”
Here’s an answer: The MFOB assassinated General Soleimani et al; was likely involved in an attempt to assassinate President Putin with drones; kidnapped Venezuelan President Maduro; and was no doubt an accomplice in the murders of top Iranian government personnel by the jews.
In the bigger picture, the MFOB presided over the covid-19 scam and the covid “vaccine” bioattack which has caused or contributed to the deaths of millions; the MFOB repudiated the JCPOA agreement with Iran; the MFOB moved the u.s. embassy to Jerusalem; the MFOB successfully saved the effort to overthrow the Syrian government; the MFOB single-handedly trashed the framework of nuclear arms control and started an arm race that the u.s. can’t possibly win; the MFOB singlehandedly started a trade war which is destroying the economy and the value of the dollar; the MFOB has made enemies out of allies and neighbors and killed the tourist industry; the MFOB is engaged in an obvious effort to turn the u.s. into a police state; and as I type this the MFOB seems to be continuing to bring the u.s. closer to a catastrophic WW3 with Russia, China and Iran than ever before. Let’s face it, the satanic MFOB is not only destroying the constitution, the rule of law and the dollar, but the creature’s continuing provocations are openly flirting with nuclear war and planetary extinction.
There is simply no comparison. The fat orange bastard by its words, deeds and relentless pursuit of a hopeless and very dangerous agenda is clearly the most unhinged, most morally bankrupt and therefore most dangerous “president” in u.s. history.
If you would provide some references from law journals, case law and such.
It is settled law that a sworn law enforcement officer can shoot at a suspect fleeing in a vehicle.
Agent deliberately moved in front of the vehicle to block it: completely reckless.
Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles. Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle
Suspected felons only.
UNDER TRADITIONAL RULE, FATAL SHOOTINGS BY POLICE OFFICERS OF SUSPECTED FELONS WHO ARE FLEEING FROM ARREST GENERALLY HAVE BEEN HELD PRIVILEGED AND THUS NOT SUBJECT TO LEGAL SANCTION
He could have easily stepped out of the way instead of opening fire.
The legality of the ICE agent’s use of force in this case will likely turn on three specific facts: whether the agent made a reckless tactical decision by stepping in front of the vehicle, whether Ms. Good’s actions were reasonably perceived as presenting an imminent threat of death or great bodily harm to the agent or others, and whether the agent could have reasonably resolved any threat presented by the vehicle’s forward movement by stepping out of the way instead of shooting.
(by Seth W. Stoughton is a Professor of Law at the University of South Carolina Joseph F. Rice School of Law, where he serves as the Faculty Director of the Excellence in Policing & Public Safety Program.)
You have read my posts for some time, as I have yours.
Both she and her lesbian lover
She was no felon.
Doesn’t appear she had any previous felony convictions.
However, what she was doing (blocking ICE vehicles/officers with her car when they are trying to detain someone) appears to be a crime:
1. Obstruction of Justice: Under federal law, obstructing an officer in the performance of their official duties is a serious offense. This includes actions such as physically blocking ICE agents, providing false information, or using intimidation to prevent an arrest. Depending on the circumstances, individuals could face misdemeanor or felony charges, leading to fines and potential jail time.
https://www.birdsall-law.com/legal-implications-of-interfering-with-immigration-enforcement
I really haven't followed the details of the case, but is that correct? Wasn't she "a legal observer," intending to provide advice to protestors who might be arrested? From the videos, it's not clear to me that she was actually blocking anything where she was parked.
However, what she was doing (blocking ICE vehicles/officers with her car when they are trying to detain someone) appears to be a crime:
Thank you so much for proving my point as a stylist of the Kamala Harris School of Communication disciple.
You don’t need to thank me. Yes, you certainly could be described as a “stylist of the Kamala Harris School of Communication disciple” or something like that, but you didn’t need me to expose this notable characteristic of yours, knucklehead, as your irrelevant, childishly incoherent verbal vomit clearly speaks for itself.
You are in need of a realistic appraisal of your banality and disjointed thoughts.
Perhaps, but both the “realistic” qualification and your embarrassing, relatively far more disjointed “thoughts” would obviously make such an endeavor completely out of reach and irrelevant to you chump.
Of course I see you as a mediocre thinker but also a product of modern public schools, and developmental immaturity.
Well you’re supposed to be looking at your monitor, not your mirror, as you type your infantile drivel, you silly retard.
Are you paying mom for occupying her house in your adulthood?
I don’t see how the question is at all relevant to this “discussion” but being that you’ve broached the subject, I’ll say that right now I’m paying a rather high rent to a unrelated landlord. Unfortunately, not all of us have the ability to live rent free inside our own rectums the way you do, chumpy.
Yeah, I don't think I've seen a single take on this that didn't align with the person's preexisting views on ICE, mine included. My view in these situations is always pretty much the same though. If you don't want to risk your life, then don't fuck with the police. Don't insert yourself in a law enforcement situation, don't resist arrest, and don't endanger officers with deadly weapons. Usually it's a black thug, but I don't have any more sympathy because it's a white woman. An SUV is an SUV, whether it's driven by LeBron James or Taylor Swift. That's interesting about those groups. Regardless of how involved they are, there are definitely many powerful people that are trying to totally neuter ICE. I think the question of whether to give ICE more powers in response is a difficult one. If those people succeed in obstructing ICE, it could encourage further waves of migrants and eliminate the incentive to self-deport for the ones already here. On the other side, there's Anglin's scenario that ICE could start rounding up American citizens for criticizing Israel. I tend to think Anglin's scenario is pretty unlikely. I recall that Anglin also predicted that Trump would use Charlie Kirk's death as a sort of Reichstag Fire to crack down on free speech. Never happened. That doesn't mean this one won't, but I've always tended to see Trump and his administration as far too incompetent to pull something like that off. Regardless, I don't see why he couldn't just use the FBI to arrest critics of Israel.Certainly, the best option would be to target the employers of illegals and institute e-verify. For whatever reason though, that's never happened. So ICE is what we've got, and I'm more concerned about having no immigration enforcement than I am about the remote possibility that it could be turned against Americans.Replies: @Greg Garros
Lots of accusations of the Right having Pavlovian reactions to the killing (perhaps they do in some cases), but the biggest Pavlovian dogs in this whole ICE affair are the Left-wing groups, who’ve reacted this way since 2016.
Yeah, I don’t think I’ve seen a single take on this that didn’t align with the person’s preexisting views on ICE, mine included.
^I think that’s probably the truest thing that’s been said in this entire thread of comments and in the larger national media discussion.
It seems like everyone is using this particular ICE killing as a proxy for a larger discussion about ICE’s right to exist and perform its basic function of detaining “illegal aliens” (foreigners here unlawfully), and whether we should have a border etc. It’s devolving back to the 2017-18 “kids in cages!” level of discussion. It’s George Floyd 2.0.
I think Trump is a disaster, but there’s no evidence that this incident is anything other than ICE performing its legal duties —> ICE meets obstructionists/organized provocateurs —> Provocateurs go overboard. —> rogue ICE agent apparently goes overboard in response, resulting in tragedy.
These tragedies happen with local, state, and sometimes federal law enforcement on occasion, especially when people do what you describe:
If you don’t want to risk your life, then don’t fuck with the police. Don’t insert yourself in a law enforcement situation
It’s a generally rare thing, and a case-by-case thing. I assume Renee Good’s estate will have the right to sue ICE here, and they will probably win a few million bucks.
I haven’t heard one person say that the detainments those ICE officers were trying to carry out were illegal or outside the scope of ICE’s duties.
Also – Oversight and control of ICE was transferred to the Dept of Homeland Security (DHS) in 2003 (after 9/11). If this incident is going to trigger a larger discussion about whether ICE should exist, some discussion of its origin is warranted, but I’m seeing none of that.
I’m more concerned about having no immigration enforcement than I am about the remote possibility that it could be turned against Americans.
^Another good point.
Trump ran 3 times on solving this immigration issue and its the only reason he ever became President. Arguably the only federal agency that deserved to have its budget increased is ICE. An increase is ICE agents and an increase in immigration judges to deal with the cases is a commensurate response to the size of the immigration problem that exists.
But of course, like everything, the Israel-loyalists tend to hijack these programs for their own purposes, so I’m willing to criticize ICE when it targets foreigners for wrong-think, like those college students and op-ed writers who were abducted for criticizing Israel. That’s a separate issue. But these people harassing ICE couldn’t make that distinction if you beat them over the head with it.
That's a grossly reductionist view of the matter.See the following post upthread:https://www.unz.com/runz/the-trump-doctrine-they-have-it-we-want-it-we-take-it/#comment-7457891That federal rule change has enabled ICE to engage in conduct that would otherwise be described as flagrantly unconstitutional. As such, I find any effort to depict the conduct of ICE as 'just performing its legal duties' to be misleading, at best.To be clear, I don't encourage obstruction, yet Team Trump hasn't done itself any favors by expanding police powers as they have, transforming erstwhile legally protected conduct into an arrestable offense. In so doing, they engender support for their opposition while seriously damaging their own.
I think Trump is a disaster, but there’s no evidence that this incident is anything other than ICE performing its legal duties —> ICE meets obstructionists/organized provocateurs —> Provocateurs go overboard. —> rogue ICE agent apparently goes overboard in response, resulting in tragedy.
Well .... NO .... in fact. That was a peripheral issue for many voters.
Trump ran 3 times on solving this immigration issue and its the only reason he ever became President.
Did you comprehend that Greg Garrulous?
SOLVING 9/11 ENDS THE WARS.
So Greg Garrulous, you have your priorities all wrong.
Bottom Line: Once the perpetrators of the 9/11 False Flag are out of the way (ie: the core structure of ZOG), we NO LONGER NEED TO WORRY about the immigration issue, chronic inflation (caused by the ZOG owned Federal Reserve), the need for having and funding over 900 bases in 130 countries, the funding for the bloated MISSS - Military Industrial Security Surveillance State - or pretty much anything else.
It was this cartel of Talmudic financiers that controlled the entirety of the western financial and political systems, THEY were behind all of America's (and the world's) ailments.
With ZOG cleansed from the system, THE WHOLE WORLD RETURNS TO NORMAL.
Thank you again.
IMO, we need to transcend the political dichotomy to see matters clearly. Blood and soil abide only insofar as the will to preserve them exist. Ideology is the decisive factor determining whether that will persists or not. As such, ideology makes all the difference, not blood and soil alone. Fickle as our species may be, it remains incumbent upon us to labor for preservation of that ideology most beneficial to our survival and well being.
As it stands, our nation is divided roughly in half on the matter of deportation, yet in recent months, there has been a precipitous decline in support for the methods now implemented by ICE. There’s even noteworthy dissent on the right. In the short term, it looks as if the bad optics of it are likely to cost Team Trump in the coming midterms.
So it’s improbable that the current push for mass deportation, with all of its attendant unconstitutionality, will result in much more than a slight decrease in illegal immigration while inflaming racial and political tensions domestically. However successful, it certainly will do nothing to forestall the inevitable demographic change brought about by remaining people of color, as white birth rates are nowhere near replacement level and there’s very little indication this is going to improve in the near future.
As such, the notion of dispensing with constitutional law in order to salvage a semblance of it in generations to come appears to be little more than a far-flung flight of fancy. If you believe that law is a product of racial ingenuity, well… you just won’t have the requisite numbers to revive it.
I realize this won’t convince those who believe constitutional law depends on white folk to survive, but abiding by it is certainly a more effective means of persuading people it’s worth preserving than encouraging the jackboot thuggery of Team Trump on a promise you can never keep.
If you agree with Pierre’s assessment of the situation, this shouldn’t be too hard to apprehend.
I'm laughing so hard I can barely type.I drank quite a lot of beer till about the age of forty—I'm not sure that I've even had a sip of the stuff since then, however—and Coors was my favorite domestic brew. I recall how astonished I was to learn in the late seventies that "good" people eschewed the company's beers and ales on principle. I had enough courage to defy the accepted wisdom, however, and continued drinking the stuff at my local watering hole. On the other hand, I was never able to muster the resolution needed to kill the leftists who told me I shouldn't be drinking Coors.I guess I just didn't have what it takes to qualify for employment as an armed, armored, and masked ICE enforcer.Replies: @Poupon Marx
… different perspectives on one Adolph Coors Hitler.
Thanks, Pierre. Any humor we can garner in this age we like in are precious, indeed. You have, over the years, provided me with many chuckles and chortles, inveighing against self-deception, inflated cognitive deficits in the commentariat.
Hopefully, we have in some cases, been successful in spurring spurious mind to return to the sources of knowledge and formulate better and more complete thoughts.
I did find that Mexicans were quite generous at sharing their food, which was delicious, remember these are old skoo Mexicans not cholos. Nigra ain’t giving you shit.
LOL And yeah, unlike Nigras, Mexicans are generous with their delicious food. It’s like my white buddy said, “They use the cheapest cut of meat and it’s always delicious.”
The illegals (with false papers) I worked with in a salmon cannery in Alaska were cool to work with and it was was good for my Spanish working and talking side by side all day. They invited me to join them down in Washington state to pick apples but I got lucky and got myself a job as a deckhand on a purse seiner for the Ketchikan fall-fishing salmon season.
As for that Captain America, American-flag bandana, my little brother used to wear one too. That was back in the late 70’s. Until you mentioned it, I had forgotten about it. LOL.
However, this introduces a key paradox: as soon as external involvement becomes apparent (through the involvement of the diaspora, propaganda, or political statements by Western officials), the protests lose legitimacy in the eyes of Iranians. That’s because they are seen not as an internal social process but as a tool of external pressure. In the context of prolonged sanctions and so-called “hybrid pressure,” this perception only intensifies.As a result, protests in Iran are caught in a bind: without external support, they fail to instigate significant political change, yet with too much outside backing, they risk losing their domestic appeal. This largely explains why the recent waves of protests, despite drawing international attention, have had only limited political impact.This is practically an endorsement of the riots, with no explanation of the mechanisms of covert action. There IS NOT explicit mention in this article of US and Israeli involvement. There's no mention of Trump's threats, no mention of US war preparations. One could almost argue that Russian coverage is MORE PRO-ZIONIST more PRO-TRUMP than American coverage!https://www.rt.com/news/630957-disorder-instead-of-protest-iran/Replies: @JPS, @Poupon Marx
You’re obviously a poor chess player, and poker player. Transparent, and I don’t mean deep in thought or clear thinking. While you are confined to riding a donkey, Putin and Xi are streaking across the sky in stealth mode at hypersonic speed.
Please retire to study and serious thought before writing in a public forum.
I don’t think we need to read anyone’s mind to see that the shooting was justified.
“We”? Speak for yourself.
Well look what's talking. You wouldn't know what a "mind" was, goofball, if your boyfriend shoved it up your ample jew ass.
I believe you will never improve yourself or your mind, which is a colloquial term for the Psyche and Ego, tempered by Archetypes, further than retro-actively searching in the dirt for supporting events to bolster your preening and virtue signaling.
First, big words don't work for you, you silly retard. Second, I stated an opinion based on common sense reasoning applied to what I believe are relevant, generally accepted facts. If you don't agree with my conclusion, then rather than waste time and bandwidth here with yet another of your trademark irrelevant, childishly incoherent word salads, maybe you could try to refute what I said e.g. by getting your care giver or some other sympathetic adult to help you compose something meaningful.
This is the same methodology which plagues scientific research and experimental conclusions. Known as Reverse Engineering, a conclusion is selected and “evidence” is created or warped to justify the outcome.
Actually no it wasn't, but coming from from a consummate moron such as yourself, your disapproval is a great endorsement.
Your comment is of low quality, non-sequiturs, and logical fallacies.
Sorry knucklehead, but I only consider accepting advice from other sentient beings, which obviously leaves you out.Replies: @Poupon Marx
Please redouble your events at greater knowledge inflow and introspective criticism of your low level reasoning ability.
Thank you so much for proving my point as a stylist of the Kamala Harris School of Communication disciple. You are in need of a realistic appraisal of your banality and disjointed thoughts.
Of course I see you as a mediocre thinker but also a product of modern public schools, and developmental immaturity. Are you paying mom for occupying her house in your adulthood?
You don't need to thank me. Yes, you certainly could be described as a "stylist of the Kamala Harris School of Communication disciple" or something like that, but you didn't need me to expose this notable characteristic of yours, knucklehead, as your irrelevant, childishly incoherent verbal vomit clearly speaks for itself.
Thank you so much for proving my point as a stylist of the Kamala Harris School of Communication disciple.
Perhaps, but both the "realistic" qualification and your embarrassing, relatively far more disjointed "thoughts" would obviously make such an endeavor completely out of reach and irrelevant to you chump.
You are in need of a realistic appraisal of your banality and disjointed thoughts.
Well you're supposed to be looking at your monitor, not your mirror, as you type your infantile drivel, you silly retard.
Of course I see you as a mediocre thinker but also a product of modern public schools, and developmental immaturity.
I don't see how the question is at all relevant to this "discussion" but being that you've broached the subject, I'll say that right now I'm paying a rather high rent to a unrelated landlord. Unfortunately, not all of us have the ability to live rent free inside our own rectums the way you do, chumpy.
Are you paying mom for occupying her house in your adulthood?
the time he takes to unhoster his gun, could have been used to move out of the way. The car is barely moving at that point.
He’s hit by the car. That’s it.
No, what I said is he might have tried to position himself in front of the car to block her from leaving, and/or, as a pretext to shoot if she tried to flee the scene. I don't know what he was actually thinking. It's all speculation. All I know is what I can see in the videos.But I also think she was a nutjob, full to the brim with woke sewage, and I'm not losing sleep over her loss.Replies: @Rurik
You actually think he tried to get hit by the car to justify firing his weapon? Really?
But I also think she was a nutjob, full to the brim with woke sewage, and I’m not losing sleep over her loss.
I should have added that she was also (stupidly) trying to obstruct government agents from conducting a legal and official, (and much needed) operation. So some people might call that ‘play stupid, games..’
According to NATO's own reports, effectiveness of the NATO attack on Serbia in 1999 was 5% due to all kinds of tricks Serbs pulled including fakes and decoys. Wesley Clark was furious when he got there and realized that the Serbian Army withdrew almost intact.
The Kosovo war was 1999, Serbs had too many decoys...
“According to NATO’s own reports, effectiveness of the NATO attack on Serbia in 1999 was 5% due to all kinds of tricks Serbs pulled including fakes and decoys. Wesley Clark was furious when he got there and realized that the Serbian Army withdrew almost intact.”
Not to take any side on the political/ethnic/moral aspect of this war, we were very impressed and happy that Serbs managed to keep most of their army by these tricks, so when I later heard that it will not work next time, it was a bit of a disappointment (though expected). But that’s what they said (and I believe it), they fixed this issue meaning that today NATO has enough missiles/bombs to destroy all fakes, decoys and real systems, and they locate the real ones much better. So, that worked only once, have to think about something else. We did something similar in the WWII when Soviets tried to bomb Helsinki. We turned all lights off and put bonfires to some fields, so these night bombers (they mostly came in the night) did not find Helsinki (I mean, it was really small to be a capital) and dropped the bombs to the bonfires. But this also worked only once, today Russians would not miss Helsinki. Lessons of wars do not age well.
[facepalm]There is no legal or moral basis for treating the opinion of a mind-reader as grounds for mitigating or reducing a well-founded charge of willful murder.Replies: @Lawrence Erickson
I think what most likely happened is that she got an adrenaline rush after the butchdyke said “drive, baby, drive” …
Lol, I’m not asking my opinion to be submitted in a court of law. It’s just an opinion on what she was thinking. I don’t think we need to read anyone’s mind to see that the shooting was justified.
… different perspectives on one Adolph Coors Hitler.
I’m laughing so hard I can barely type.
I drank quite a lot of beer till about the age of forty—I’m not sure that I’ve even had a sip of the stuff since then, however—and Coors was my favorite domestic brew. I recall how astonished I was to learn in the late seventies that “good” people eschewed the company’s beers and ales on principle. I had enough courage to defy the accepted wisdom, however, and continued drinking the stuff at my local watering hole. On the other hand, I was never able to muster the resolution needed to kill the leftists who told me I shouldn’t be drinking Coors.
I guess I just didn’t have what it takes to qualify for employment as an armed, armored, and masked ICE enforcer.
I meant this as a rhetorical question, I was agreeing with you that it's a silly thing to ask.
Why didn’t the officer jump out of the way?
I think what most likely happened is that she got an adrenaline rush after the butchdyke said “drive, baby, drive” …
[facepalm]
There is no legal or moral basis for treating the opinion of a mind-reader as grounds for mitigating or reducing a well-founded charge of willful murder.
However, this introduces a key paradox: as soon as external involvement becomes apparent (through the involvement of the diaspora, propaganda, or political statements by Western officials), the protests lose legitimacy in the eyes of Iranians. That’s because they are seen not as an internal social process but as a tool of external pressure. In the context of prolonged sanctions and so-called “hybrid pressure,” this perception only intensifies.As a result, protests in Iran are caught in a bind: without external support, they fail to instigate significant political change, yet with too much outside backing, they risk losing their domestic appeal. This largely explains why the recent waves of protests, despite drawing international attention, have had only limited political impact.This is practically an endorsement of the riots, with no explanation of the mechanisms of covert action. There IS NOT explicit mention in this article of US and Israeli involvement. There's no mention of Trump's threats, no mention of US war preparations. One could almost argue that Russian coverage is MORE PRO-ZIONIST more PRO-TRUMP than American coverage!https://www.rt.com/news/630957-disorder-instead-of-protest-iran/Replies: @JPS, @Poupon Marx
I’d go further than that. I’d assert that it’s obvious that when KUSHNER and Whatkike spent 5 HOURS with Putin it had nothing to do with Ukraine or coming to an agreement with UKRAINE. They went there to explain the Iran plans. Note the utterly supine position of Russia in the press with respect to the attempt overthrow Iran.
Russian war-coverage channels seem to no longer cover anything relating to the Middle East – not because that is the point of view of the creators, because those are conditions for their funding and their sources of information.
I believe you will never improve yourself or your mind, which is a colloquial term for the Psyche and Ego, tempered by Archetypes, further than retro-actively searching in the dirt for supporting events to bolster your preening and virtue signaling.
Well look what’s talking. You wouldn’t know what a “mind” was, goofball, if your boyfriend shoved it up your ample jew ass.
This is the same methodology which plagues scientific research and experimental conclusions. Known as Reverse Engineering, a conclusion is selected and “evidence” is created or warped to justify the outcome.
First, big words don’t work for you, you silly retard. Second, I stated an opinion based on common sense reasoning applied to what I believe are relevant, generally accepted facts. If you don’t agree with my conclusion, then rather than waste time and bandwidth here with yet another of your trademark irrelevant, childishly incoherent word salads, maybe you could try to refute what I said e.g. by getting your care giver or some other sympathetic adult to help you compose something meaningful.
Your comment is of low quality, non-sequiturs, and logical fallacies.
Actually no it wasn’t, but coming from from a consummate moron such as yourself, your disapproval is a great endorsement.
Please redouble your events at greater knowledge inflow and introspective criticism of your low level reasoning ability.
Sorry knucklehead, but I only consider accepting advice from other sentient beings, which obviously leaves you out.
No slavery was a provision of settlement …
Well, it seems that it wasn’t. The sole antislavery provision specified that any children born to slave parents in Tejas would be considered free at birth. The parents themselves remained slaves.
https://komonews.com/news/nation-world/far-left-groups-are-behind-the-funding-of-anti-ice-protests-in-minnesota-report-new-york-post-renee-good-immigration-dchttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indivisible_movementThe group is run by Leah Greenberg (age 38) and Ezra Levin (age 39). So it appears I was correct when I said the following:
One of the groups allegedly funding the protests is called Indivisible Twin Cities, which is a branch of the anti-Trump group called the Indivisible Project based in Washington, D.C.This group was also reportedly behind the “No Kings” protests that happened around the U.S. last year that reportedly received millions of dollars from Soros’ Open Society Foundations between 2018 and 2023.
Soros appears to have stopped funding the group in 2023. And I doubt the Chabad Lubavitchers who run the Trump White House will allow these protests to gain ground until after Iran is destroyed. So, for now, these anti-ICE protests will fail.Replies: @Lawrence Erickson
Therefore, I suspect the organizers and financial benefactors of these anti-ICE protests are probably Gentiles. Maybe some younger Jews just getting their feet wet. Until masked Antifa-type agents show up with metal rods and Molotov cocktails, and the black rioting and looting starts, it’s clear the Jewish big wigs haven’t put the big dollars into these protests yet.
Lots of accusations of the Right having Pavlovian reactions to the killing (perhaps they do in some cases), but the biggest Pavlovian dogs in this whole ICE affair are the Left-wing groups, who’ve reacted this way since 2016.
Yeah, I don’t think I’ve seen a single take on this that didn’t align with the person’s preexisting views on ICE, mine included. My view in these situations is always pretty much the same though. If you don’t want to risk your life, then don’t fuck with the police. Don’t insert yourself in a law enforcement situation, don’t resist arrest, and don’t endanger officers with deadly weapons. Usually it’s a black thug, but I don’t have any more sympathy because it’s a white woman. An SUV is an SUV, whether it’s driven by LeBron James or Taylor Swift.
That’s interesting about those groups. Regardless of how involved they are, there are definitely many powerful people that are trying to totally neuter ICE. I think the question of whether to give ICE more powers in response is a difficult one. If those people succeed in obstructing ICE, it could encourage further waves of migrants and eliminate the incentive to self-deport for the ones already here. On the other side, there’s Anglin’s scenario that ICE could start rounding up American citizens for criticizing Israel. I tend to think Anglin’s scenario is pretty unlikely. I recall that Anglin also predicted that Trump would use Charlie Kirk’s death as a sort of Reichstag Fire to crack down on free speech. Never happened. That doesn’t mean this one won’t, but I’ve always tended to see Trump and his administration as far too incompetent to pull something like that off. Regardless, I don’t see why he couldn’t just use the FBI to arrest critics of Israel.
Certainly, the best option would be to target the employers of illegals and institute e-verify. For whatever reason though, that’s never happened. So ICE is what we’ve got, and I’m more concerned about having no immigration enforcement than I am about the remote possibility that it could be turned against Americans.
^I think that's probably the truest thing that's been said in this entire thread of comments and in the larger national media discussion.
Yeah, I don’t think I’ve seen a single take on this that didn’t align with the person’s preexisting views on ICE, mine included.
It's a generally rare thing, and a case-by-case thing. I assume Renee Good's estate will have the right to sue ICE here, and they will probably win a few million bucks.
If you don’t want to risk your life, then don’t fuck with the police. Don’t insert yourself in a law enforcement situation
^Another good point.
I’m more concerned about having no immigration enforcement than I am about the remote possibility that it could be turned against Americans.
The Kosovo war was 1999, Serbs had too many decoys…
According to NATO’s own reports, effectiveness of the NATO attack on Serbia in 1999 was 5% due to all kinds of tricks Serbs pulled including fakes and decoys. Wesley Clark was furious when he got there and realized that the Serbian Army withdrew almost intact.
Of course, civilians and civilian infrastructure cannot be protected and that is what NATO (aka Joint Criminal Enterprise aka North Atlantic Terrorist Organization) targets to “win”.
[1] Serbian Army decoys photo #1
[1] Serbian Army decoys photo #2
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
P.S. Many fall for the propaganda and use the term ‘Kosovo War’, which was concocted by the West/MSM to a) hide the fact that a sovereign country, Serbia, was illegally attacked and not only its Kosovo Province, and b) to create an impression that Province of Serbia called Kosovo was somehow something separate, which legally is not so even today, although they are still working hard on that. In a similar manner, Albanian separatists/terrorists are now calling themselves Kosovars in order to hide the fact that they killed and expelled close to all non-Albanians upon “liberation” i.e. occupation of Serbia’s Holy Land called Kosovo by NATO.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1000+ Anon001 Comments Archive @ The Unz Review | TUR
https://www.unz.com/comments/all/?commenterfilter=anon001
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Poupy, I can't understand how, on the one hand you acknowledge the existence of the Zionist International Deep State Oligarchs (aka ZOG), and the degree of death and depravity they cause, and yet, for some unfathomable reason, you can't see that Malignant International Jewry manoeuvred/intimidated/bribed western politicians and other heads of state to create the circumstances that would INEVITABLY lead to WWII* - with the express intention of destroying NSDAP Germany.
I will post a video as reference to why Adolph HAD to promote war.
Most discussions of WWII have degenerated to mere narratives and memes. They also are repetitive, low on verifiable evidence, and “out of the box search and consideration”. That requires individual relentless curiosity.
On my own, I often wondered how Hitler financed so much of a military, social, and public works without concomitant trade increases. I had commented on this using discovered sources, earlier this year, I believe. [Much of your opinions and comments were countered by me and others in previous posts. That’s why I encourage you to read my comments regularly]
Please read the following intrepid report that transgresses cliches, and trite tread worn material.
I've suggested (for your benefit), that you read all of John Wear's world class book 'Germany's War'.
You see, and I know a ton of the UR readership will agree, there is no one whose views are MORE SET IN STONE than yours.
And one last thing that you (and others in this webzine) refuse to accept:
Summary: No Nation, No Regime, is ever entirely bad or entirely good.
You will find countless examples of evil deeds to demonise whatever nation/regime that you choose to put under the microscope. There's always dirt we can dig out about them.
But, using any honest metric you choose to apply, you will soon determine that:
The crimes of the Anglo-Zionist empire alone (during WWII and in the immediate post war years), were perhaps an ORDER OF MAGNITUDE MORE HEINOUS, both in qualitative and quantitative terms, than anything the Germans did during WWII.
If we were to then add the crimes of the Judeo-Bolshevik Soviet empire with Stalin at the helm (ie: initiatives the latter undertook that were directly responsible for the loss of millions of Soviet citizens and millions more of Soviet POW's - through his Scorched Earth Policies and other heavy handedness), then the disparity blows out further still.
Ludicrous. Perhaps you haven't' discovered you are a Shabbos Goy yet.
It isn’t confined to South Front either. Every Russian source I regularly go to seems to line up with the Jewish narratives.
Since the riots are apparently mostly subdued, (it’s been a few days now), RT makes an article about it on January 14. Pravda made a report on the 12th. It was impossible to find mention of the riots and US preparations for war against Iran on the Russian propaganda outlets I look for information on. After many years, the pattern is unmistakable.
However, this introduces a key paradox: as soon as external involvement becomes apparent (through the involvement of the diaspora, propaganda, or political statements by Western officials), the protests lose legitimacy in the eyes of Iranians. That’s because they are seen not as an internal social process but as a tool of external pressure. In the context of prolonged sanctions and so-called “hybrid pressure,” this perception only intensifies.
As a result, protests in Iran are caught in a bind: without external support, they fail to instigate significant political change, yet with too much outside backing, they risk losing their domestic appeal. This largely explains why the recent waves of protests, despite drawing international attention, have had only limited political impact.
This is practically an endorsement of the riots, with no explanation of the mechanisms of covert action. There IS NOT explicit mention in this article of US and Israeli involvement. There’s no mention of Trump’s threats, no mention of US war preparations. One could almost argue that Russian coverage is MORE PRO-ZIONIST more PRO-TRUMP than American coverage!
https://www.rt.com/news/630957-disorder-instead-of-protest-iran/
He’s hit by the car. That’s it.
the time he takes to unhoster his gun, could have been used to move out of the way. The car is barely moving at that point.
You actually think he tried to get hit by the car to justify firing his weapon? Really?
No, what I said is he might have tried to position himself in front of the car to block her from leaving, and/or, as a pretext to shoot if she tried to flee the scene.
I don’t know what he was actually thinking. It’s all speculation. All I know is what I can see in the videos.
But I also think she was a nutjob, full to the brim with woke sewage, and I’m not losing sleep over her loss.
I should have added that she was also (stupidly) trying to obstruct government agents from conducting a legal and official, (and much needed) operation. So some people might call that 'play stupid, games..'
But I also think she was a nutjob, full to the brim with woke sewage, and I’m not losing sleep over her loss.
Hmm…
The one you highlight appears to show that the car hit the ICE agent, which seems rather implausible since he afterwards showed not the slightest sign of any physical injury. But because of the positioning of the camera, what actually happened is far from clear.
Wait, we need a second opinion! Please forward those CT scans to our resident armchair biomechanical/accident reconstruction expert to examine… from his armchair!
ICE agent who shot Renee Good suffered internal bleeding, officials say
By Nicole Sganga, Jennifer Jacobs
Updated on: January 14, 2026
The Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent who fatally shot Renee Good last week in Minneapolis, Jonathan Ross, suffered internal bleeding to the torso following the incident, according to two U.S. officials briefed on his medical condition…
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ice-officer-who-shot-renee-good-internal-injuries-sources-say/
Replies: @Antiwar7, @Truth Vigilante, @Ron Unz
https://static01.nyt.com/images/2016/01/14/us/15harvard-web1/15harvard-web1-superJumbo.jpg
So anonymous comments are proof. Appropriate for an anonymous commenter.
you're right about the skittles and the knee-jerk sympathies of the ((media))
If you can’t see the agent getting hit in the video, there’s just nothing else to argue about. You live in an alternate reality.
He’s hit by the car. That’s it. Whether he’s on the left, right or in the middle. First, all the lefties said he wasn’t hit. Now that video evidence shows he was hit, it was “only” by the front corner of the car?. This would be funny if it wasn’t so sad. You actually think he tried to get hit by the car to justify firing his weapon? Really?
I’m well acquainted with people who’ve been mistreated by law enforcement. I don’t just jump on the bandwagon. But this is open and shut.
I meant this as a rhetorical question, I was agreeing with you that it's a silly thing to ask.
Why didn’t the officer jump out of the way?
It is suspected that the group funding ‘ICE Watch’ (the group that Renee Good worked with) and these anti-ICE protests is a national group called Indivisible. The group was formed in 2016 to obstruct and resist Trump at every turn. They were a major funder and organizer of the George Floyd riots.
Lots of accusations of the Right having Pavlovian reactions to the killing (perhaps they do in some cases), but the biggest Pavlovian dogs in this whole ICE affair are the Left-wing groups, who’ve reacted this way since 2016. This “Indivisible” group, including its Twin Cities offshoot, is perhaps the most classic case of this.
One of the groups allegedly funding the protests is called Indivisible Twin Cities, which is a branch of the anti-Trump group called the Indivisible Project based in Washington, D.C.
This group was also reportedly behind the “No Kings” protests that happened around the U.S. last year that reportedly received millions of dollars from Soros’ Open Society Foundations between 2018 and 2023.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indivisible_movement
The group is run by Leah Greenberg (age 38) and Ezra Levin (age 39). So it appears I was correct when I said the following:
Therefore, I suspect the organizers and financial benefactors of these anti-ICE protests are probably Gentiles. Maybe some younger Jews just getting their feet wet. Until masked Antifa-type agents show up with metal rods and Molotov cocktails, and the black rioting and looting starts, it’s clear the Jewish big wigs haven’t put the big dollars into these protests yet.
Soros appears to have stopped funding the group in 2023. And I doubt the Chabad Lubavitchers who run the Trump White House will allow these protests to gain ground until after Iran is destroyed. So, for now, these anti-ICE protests will fail.
Yeah, I don't think I've seen a single take on this that didn't align with the person's preexisting views on ICE, mine included. My view in these situations is always pretty much the same though. If you don't want to risk your life, then don't fuck with the police. Don't insert yourself in a law enforcement situation, don't resist arrest, and don't endanger officers with deadly weapons. Usually it's a black thug, but I don't have any more sympathy because it's a white woman. An SUV is an SUV, whether it's driven by LeBron James or Taylor Swift. That's interesting about those groups. Regardless of how involved they are, there are definitely many powerful people that are trying to totally neuter ICE. I think the question of whether to give ICE more powers in response is a difficult one. If those people succeed in obstructing ICE, it could encourage further waves of migrants and eliminate the incentive to self-deport for the ones already here. On the other side, there's Anglin's scenario that ICE could start rounding up American citizens for criticizing Israel. I tend to think Anglin's scenario is pretty unlikely. I recall that Anglin also predicted that Trump would use Charlie Kirk's death as a sort of Reichstag Fire to crack down on free speech. Never happened. That doesn't mean this one won't, but I've always tended to see Trump and his administration as far too incompetent to pull something like that off. Regardless, I don't see why he couldn't just use the FBI to arrest critics of Israel.Certainly, the best option would be to target the employers of illegals and institute e-verify. For whatever reason though, that's never happened. So ICE is what we've got, and I'm more concerned about having no immigration enforcement than I am about the remote possibility that it could be turned against Americans.Replies: @Greg Garros
Lots of accusations of the Right having Pavlovian reactions to the killing (perhaps they do in some cases), but the biggest Pavlovian dogs in this whole ICE affair are the Left-wing groups, who’ve reacted this way since 2016.
If you can’t see the agent getting hit in the video, there’s just nothing else to argue about. You live in an alternate reality.
you’re right about the skittles and the knee-jerk sympathies of the ((media))
and yes, I can see where he was struck by the vehicle, but I’ll give you my take on that, fwiw.
He could see that the other agent was ordering the provocateur out of her vehicle. He understood, as we all do, that in situations like that, there is the possibility that the person may try to gun the gas, and flee the scene, and so I think he positioned himself at the front of her SUV, to block her from leaving, but he did so in such a way that he could both, shoot her, if she tried to leave, but also in such a way as to allow himself to move out of the way, if she continued to drive away.
Because he was at the corner of her vehicle, and not directly in front of it, when she gunned the gas, I don’t think he was in imminent danger, I suspect his position was deliberate and calculated to give him a pretext for deadly force, while also allowing him to avoid serious injury to himself.
That, fwiw, it how it all looks to me.
If so, I suppose the shooting was not justified, if I’m right about what happened. But then I have no way of knowing if that’s what he was doing, or what was going through his mind.
But this issue is far, far wider than just that person’s death.
This country is at war. We saw that with the BLM rioters, burning and looting and murdering, to the indifference of our nation’s highest law enforcement, and support of the media, (‘mostly peaceful protests, blah, blah).
In a way, this shooting is like Kyle Rittenhouse, with the people who were supporting Kyle, being the people who now support the ICE agent, because these are the ‘law and order’ people, who don’t approve of burning and looting, just as now they don’t approve of a lawless, open border.
Vs. those who supported the BLM rioters, and now support the ICE protesters, because this country is ‘racist’, blah, blah.. and so the BLM rioters were the good guys, and the ICE protesters are the good guys, and when they block vehicles, they’re doing good. But if an ICE agent blocks a vehicle, he’s bad.
There are very few people who are utterly objective about what happened. It’s all relative, and all depends on their respective perspectives, and sympathies.
The unprecedented mass resignation of six federal prosecutors in MI…
Make that MN not MI.
One last try, comment #452 Punch Brother Punch has a video posted that shows the suv hit the agent. If that doesn’t convince you, nothing will.
I believe you will never improve yourself or your mind, which is a colloquial term for the Psyche and Ego, tempered by Archetypes, further than retro-actively searching in the dirt for supporting events to bolster your preening and virtue signaling.
This is the same methodology which plagues scientific research and experimental conclusions. Known as Reverse Engineering, a conclusion is selected and “evidence” is created or warped to justify the outcome.
Your comment is of low quality, non-sequiturs, and logical fallacies. Please redouble your events at greater knowledge inflow and introspective criticism of your low level reasoning ability.
Well look what's talking. You wouldn't know what a "mind" was, goofball, if your boyfriend shoved it up your ample jew ass.
I believe you will never improve yourself or your mind, which is a colloquial term for the Psyche and Ego, tempered by Archetypes, further than retro-actively searching in the dirt for supporting events to bolster your preening and virtue signaling.
First, big words don't work for you, you silly retard. Second, I stated an opinion based on common sense reasoning applied to what I believe are relevant, generally accepted facts. If you don't agree with my conclusion, then rather than waste time and bandwidth here with yet another of your trademark irrelevant, childishly incoherent word salads, maybe you could try to refute what I said e.g. by getting your care giver or some other sympathetic adult to help you compose something meaningful.
This is the same methodology which plagues scientific research and experimental conclusions. Known as Reverse Engineering, a conclusion is selected and “evidence” is created or warped to justify the outcome.
Actually no it wasn't, but coming from from a consummate moron such as yourself, your disapproval is a great endorsement.
Your comment is of low quality, non-sequiturs, and logical fallacies.
Sorry knucklehead, but I only consider accepting advice from other sentient beings, which obviously leaves you out.Replies: @Poupon Marx
Please redouble your events at greater knowledge inflow and introspective criticism of your low level reasoning ability.
Well, I think there are something like 5-6 different videos, all taken from different angles.
There are no “battling videos”. There are several different angles showing the agent in front of the vehicle being struck. It’s disingenuous to claim the proof in front of everyone’s eyes isn’t real. The agent is clearly struck, the hole in the windshield is from the front. Why is there even an argument about this?
The one you highlight appears to show that the car hit the ICE agent, which seems rather implausible since he afterwards showed not the slightest sign of any physical injury. But because of the positioning of the camera, what actually happened is far from clear.
Hmm…
ICE agent who shot Renee Good suffered internal bleeding, officials say
By Nicole Sganga, Jennifer Jacobs
Updated on: January 14, 2026The Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent who fatally shot Renee Good last week in Minneapolis, Jonathan Ross, suffered internal bleeding to the torso following the incident, according to two U.S. officials briefed on his medical condition…
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ice-officer-who-shot-renee-good-internal-injuries-sources-say/
Wait, we need a second opinion! Please forward those CT scans to our resident armchair biomechanical/accident reconstruction expert to examine… from his armchair!
What 'officials' said that?
ICE agent who shot Renee Good suffered internal bleeding, officials say
And soon thereafter they'll set up a GoFundMe platform to raise money for the poor dear.
Donald Chump's Gubmint and conscience-free goons will conjure up whatever falsehood was necessary to cover for this cold-blooded murder.
Soon enough they'll say this ICE agent is afflicted with PTSD, that he also got bone spurs and toe nail nail fungus from the incident, and that he's suffering terribly.
(esp. from the taunts he endures when wearing Open Toe sandals in public).
When "anonymous government officials" say something about Iraqi WMDs or ICE agent injuries, I'm skeptical.
The Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent who fatally shot Renee Good last week in Minneapolis, Jonathan Ross, suffered internal bleeding to the torso following the incident, according to two U.S. officials briefed on his medical condition
I meant this as a rhetorical question, I was agreeing with you that it's a silly thing to ask.
Why didn’t the officer jump out of the way?
I see perceive your comment as level headed and your disposition as one open to impartial facts [are there any other?] and new information. So many people have now engraved their interpretation in stone and nonmalleable metal.
The study of Buddhism and the Tao, provides space to expand and jump the fence of rigid belief and the necessity of buttresses of opinion tied to one’s self-image and Psyche. Only what is, stripped of personal baggage and bias, affiliations, is really relevant. This applies to many other phenomena, as well. Truth, with a capital T is what it is, not what you mutate or percieve it. It takes personal courage to go outside of your cocoon.
Poupy, I can't understand how, on the one hand you acknowledge the existence of the Zionist International Deep State Oligarchs (aka ZOG), and the degree of death and depravity they cause, and yet, for some unfathomable reason, you can't see that Malignant International Jewry manoeuvred/intimidated/bribed western politicians and other heads of state to create the circumstances that would INEVITABLY lead to WWII* - with the express intention of destroying NSDAP Germany.
I will post a video as reference to why Adolph HAD to promote war.
Thank you for the compliments, but we continue to disagree on WWII and your, in my opinion, foggy lens, limited information, immutable infatuation, and dearth of contrary updates and different perspectives on one Adolph Coors Hitleer.
Some of your positions and opinions I agree with, but I notice you display ideological and rigidity one certain issues that speak not well of an open mind. Most people of this nature and suasion are statically inclined due to personality quirks and structural weaknesses. IOW, their particular constellation of related beliefs is a crutch and main beam or post of their personality, Ego, Psyche, and many time of Persona.
There is almost a desperation of connotation, a plea it seems, in your sales pitch to see Adolph Coors as a noble figure, to be admired, and worshipped.
Please see my two extended reply comments under Ron Unz. Best to click on my moniker, sometimes twice, to bring up a list of my recent comments. My opinion is based on Alex Kainer’s presentation, which is derived from three books cited, his reputation, and the sum total of my apprehension of sources pertaining to one pot bellied corporal with severe mental health issues.
Please see also my interpretation and presentation of an evaluation of Heetleer by Carl Gustav Jung prior to WWII. I trust your educational and self-tuition background and cover can handle the concepts and contracts therein.
I'm laughing so hard I can barely type.I drank quite a lot of beer till about the age of forty—I'm not sure that I've even had a sip of the stuff since then, however—and Coors was my favorite domestic brew. I recall how astonished I was to learn in the late seventies that "good" people eschewed the company's beers and ales on principle. I had enough courage to defy the accepted wisdom, however, and continued drinking the stuff at my local watering hole. On the other hand, I was never able to muster the resolution needed to kill the leftists who told me I shouldn't be drinking Coors.I guess I just didn't have what it takes to qualify for employment as an armed, armored, and masked ICE enforcer.Replies: @Poupon Marx
… different perspectives on one Adolph Coors Hitler.
What I see are multiple videos of ICE agents detaining even American citizens without a warrant, often injuring them or forcibly dragging them from vehicles after shattering their car windows.
The anti-ICE escalators are not at all interested in your sweet hypothetical “de-escalation”. You can’t even see that?
And I thank you.
America now, in my “guesstimation”, will be seen by Historians of the Future to be in a similar situation as it was in the 1850s: very evenly divided, increasingly passionately divided, increasingly self-righteously divided by A Big Issue.
🛑 Red Man: With automation and AI on the horizon, with the nation in $38 trillion debt, with China and perhaps India gathering steam as rising industrial powers, with a large indigenous parasite class demanding federal largesse, is it good for 👉Americans👈 to be opening their borders to a possibly unlimited number of aliens of unknown skill levels and criminal backgrounds who will be competing, with a DEI wind at their backs, against our grandchildren for college admissions and jobs?
🌐 Blue Man: We imagine there’s no country (I wonder if you can?), nothing to kill or die for: a Brotherhood of Man. We imagine all the people sharing all the Earth. Greedy White Europeans stole this continent by force; by what right, then, can they call it “theirs”? Oh, my Christian heart! How it aches for the poor of the Third World! What right have right-wing racist 👉 Americans 👈 to keep this land unto themselves?
Both sides are pushing harder and harder. Some on the right are gritting their teeth, accepting that we must indeed embrace “fascism” if that’s what it takes to prevail in this life-or-death struggle for their families, their culture, and their future. They would prefer to keep their decaying Republic and its fading and tattered Constitution if possible, but willing to discard them with regret if necessary. Regimes and ideologies come and go; Blut und Boden abide. The Americans may have to overthrow the fascist regime of their own creation in a century two. But it will still be a recognizable America. If the left wins, their America shall be forever lost.
The left is following the playbook of the One-Worldists. They lack cultural roots; they lack historical knowledge. They complain that Trump is “shredding the Constitution” although they’ve never actually read it and perhaps could not read it if their college professor asked them to. They are “full of passionate intensity”, in Yeats’ phrase.
Of course the anti-ICE activists are spoiling for a fight. Of course they seek confrontation, and even escalation of confrontation. They are sure that they’re “the Good Guys”, and, most delightfully of all, are “making history”. They are breaking the King’s law and having fun (the fun of self-righteousness) doing it. They missed their parents’ Sixties, but this is even better!
Blue is Blue, and Red is Red, and never the twain shall meet /
But glare across the battle lines on Minnesota street. /
“Happy the land”, a wise man said, “that has no history”. /
We’ve just begun to count the dead in The Land of Brave and Free.
What I see are multiple videos of ICE agents detaining even American citizens without a warrant, often injuring them or forcibly dragging them from vehicles after shattering their car windows.
The anti-ICE escalators are not at all interested in your sweet hypothetical “de-escalation”. You can’t even see that?
Which leaves me wondering how you reconcile this agreement with your evident encouragement of ICE’s overreach,
(with Eustace’s permission.. and not presuming to speak for him..)
because there’s two things going on.
ICE is doing the job Trump was elected to do, and is their raison d’être, to remove illegal invaders from our nation.
and then there’s other thing, the looming abuses when ICE is used to go after ‘anti-semites.
Most thoughtful and decent people support the former.
It’s kind of like the widely popular Salvadoran president Nayib Bukele’s prison CECOT, for the worst gang criminals. It has transformed El Salvador from the most violent shithole, to a safe country with safe streets.
From Wiki
Gangs enforced their influence and made money through murder, extortion, drug trafficking, and operating businesses.[1]: 6 [3] Gangs also influenced national politics by preventing political candidates from campaigning in certain neighborhoods under their control,[3] and gang leaders have stated that they could determine the outcomes of elections.[4] Due to gang violence, El Salvador had one of the highest homicide rates in the world,[5]: 2 peaking at a rate of 103 homicides per 100,000 people in 2015.[1]: 2
swindling, influencing politics, violence.. sounds like Minnesota to me.
But yes, there is a fear that CECOT-type powers could be abused.
So it’s a devil’s trade-off. The American people want law and order, and asking politely for the illegal invaders to kindly return home, even giving them thousands of dollars to do so, doesn’t work. Like asking MS-13 gang members to be nice and obey the laws. So more stringent methods are necessary.
Is there a significant fear that these powers will one day be used to round up ‘anti-semites?
Of course there is. But the Obama and Biden regimes didn’t leave the decent people of America any choice when they orchestrated an invasion of this country.
Whenever there’s a war, TPTB seize more power to ‘win’ the war. It could be that this invasion/war was all cooked up by ZOG, specifically to give ZOG these powers. But if so, that is the fault of those who invited in the millions upon millions of unwelcome invaders, not the people trying to restore law and order.
When ZOG decides it’s time to use ICE for another Ruby Ridge-type assault on anti-semites, perhaps that’s when the Second Amendment will come in handy.
Impoverishing Americans so that they’ll work in slaughterhouses, meat packing, farms, home healthcare, cleaning restaurants, etc. is a crazy idea.
These Americans are already “impoverished,” but they can sit on their ass and receive endless welfare (Shhh! don’t let the blacks, Mexicans and Muslims know about this). Cut the welfare, especially the free food, to make it where in order to eat you have to work, and, after a few missed meals, the deadbeats will be lining up around the block to work those crummy jobs you listed.
And if all those new service jobs can’t survive without the use of cheap third-world labor – jobs such as delivering food – then let those new jobs fall by the wayside. We got along before those jobs came along and we’ll get along without them.
Doing odd jobs in my life especially in my younger years I often had to work with Mexicans. Now these senors and senoritas would be in their 50’s and 60’s now.To be honest I never had a problem with THESE amigos and amigoettes, what would be old skoo Mexicans now. The Mexican and I worked the pit shoveling leaves, branches, and mud that dropped off a line carrying tree ripened oranges at a juice plant in Polk County, Florida. Walk up the tractor trailers and hose them down. I loved it, kept me active and the Mexican was a funny dude. Always had a pint or two of J&B scotch hidden to help us have a few laughs. Watch going down that slippery trailer with the hose, however. Anyhow the Mexican told me he was getting on a bus in Chicago, and he mistook a Native for an Hispanic and talked to her in Spanish,he said she cussed him out. lol. I don’t think Native Americans have any love for Mexicans even though they are distant relatives. I often wore an American flag bandana and the beaners called me Capitan, I guess after Captain America. I did find that Mexicans were quite generous at sharing their food, which was delicious, remember these are old skoo Mexicans not cholos.Nigra ain’t giving you shit.
LOL And yeah, unlike Nigras, Mexicans are generous with their delicious food. It's like my white buddy said, "They use the cheapest cut of meat and it's always delicious."The illegals (with false papers) I worked with in a salmon cannery in Alaska were cool to work with and it was was good for my Spanish working and talking side by side all day. They invited me to join them down in Washington state to pick apples but I got lucky and got myself a job as a deckhand on a purse seiner for the Ketchikan fall-fishing salmon season.As for that Captain America, American-flag bandana, my little brother used to wear one too. That was back in the late 70's. Until you mentioned it, I had forgotten about it. LOL.
I did find that Mexicans were quite generous at sharing their food, which was delicious, remember these are old skoo Mexicans not cholos. Nigra ain't giving you shit.
> William Joyce Thompson, a copper magnate and member of Red Cross Mission to Russia as a person who funneled upto a million dollars of his own money to Socialist Revolutionary (SR) groups post February revolution.
Nothing odd about that. Note that this is after the toppling of the Czarist monarchy. This is not an issue of Thompson somehow supporting the overthrow of Nicholas II. This is a matter of Thompson wishing to support a popular government which had come into power and which Thompson hoped to keep in the war against Germany. Kerensky should have insisted on suing for an immediate peace, even if it meant that someone like Thompson would have refused any aid. The war was unpopular and Lenin realized that.
> Kennan observes that while American liberals supported extreme left of Russia even previous to 1917, curiously no support was forthcoming to the liberal Cadet party.
Kennan says no such thing, and it’s a ridiculous claim.
First of all, what were American liberals supporting before 1917?
—–
Western Jewish leaders favored a liberal rather than an extreme or revolutionary movement among Russian Jews. They more readily supported the League for the Attainment of Full Right for the Jewish People of Russia than they did the Bund. The League was founded in March 1905 without socialist participation. In matters of general Russian politics the League, like the Western leaders, favored the Cadets–the Russian Constitutional Democratic Party. On October 17/30, 1905, the tsar promised the introduction of a constitutional regime through a State Duma. While the socialists, believing in the possibility of overthrowing the tsar through a revolution, boycotted the elections, twelve Jews, all of them associated with the League, were elected to the first Duma. On July 21, 1906, the first Duma was dissolved. After having existed two years the League disintegrated and three distinct groups came into being: 1) The Jewish People’s Group, closely connected with the Cadets and headed by M. Vinaver and H. Sliosberg; 2) The People’s Party, headed by the historian Simon Dubnow; 3) The Zionists. Again, the Western Jewish leaders supported the moderate Jewish People’s Group and the Cadets in general matters of Russian politics.
—–
— Zosa Szajkowski, “Paul Nathan, Lucien Wolf, Jacob H. Schiff and the Jewish Revolutionary Movements in Eastern Europe 1903-1917,” Jewish Social Studies, Volume 29, Number 1, p. 11.
After the February Revolution had occurred, Schiff willingly gave money to Kerensky’s government. But Schiff had not been supporting any kind of socialist parties before then.
Second, what does Kennan actually say about support for the Constitutional Democrats in 1917? You apparently are drawing from a brief comment at the beginning of the book:
—–
Constitutional Democrats seem to have enjoyed little sympathy or support in the United States, except in a few business and charitable circles.
—–
— Kennan, Russia Leaves the War, p. 13.
Obviously, “few business … circles” included some important people like Schiff. At best, this is a very misleading statement by Kennan. It was true, however, that anyone who observed the elections to the Duma as they took place in Russia in 1905-6, would have realized that the Constitutional Democrats did not have support among the Russian people that could compete against socialists.
—–
On October 30, the emperor, as advised by Witte, issued the October Manifesto. That brief document … made the empire of the Romanovs a constitutional monarchy… After a free election, the First Duma convened on May 10, 1906. Contrary to its sanguine expectations, the government had suffered a decisive electoral defeat…
The cause of the Left in the First Duma had been injured by the fact that both the Socialist Revolutionaries and the Social Democrats had largely boycotted the election to the Duma…
In contrast to the first election, the government exerted all possible pressure to obtain favorable results in the election to the Second Duma… But the results again disappointed the emperor and his associates. Although … the Duma opposition, including mainly the Cadets and the Left, might have declined from 69 to 68 per cent of the total number of deputies, it became more extreme… The entire Left membership in the Duma rose from 124 to 216 deputies.
—–
— Nicholas Riasanovsky, A History of Russia, Fourth Edition, pp. 409-11, Oxford University Press, 1984.
Every time elections in which all parties participated were held, the results showed that Social Revolutionaries and Social Democrats had far greater support than Constitutional Democrats, despite the support of Jacob Schiff for the latter. It’s hardly the fault of “American liberals” if this was sometimes noted. But as far as attempts by wealthy outside interests to support any party within Russia, that went to the Constitutional Democrats and related liberal parties. There was no such outside funding of socialists. If Kennan gave a different impression, then he is simply wrong.
But even Kennan allows for more than just that short statement on p. 13 would imply.
—–
Charles R, Crane … a wealthy businessman … was well acquainted with … Paul Milyukov … of the Constitutional Democratic party… Milyukov, whom Crane knew well, was one of those conservative figures who appeared at Kaledin’s headquarters in the weeks following the Revolution… it would not be unreasonable to suppose that Crane, too, urged governmental support to the Kaledin-Alekseyev movement, closely connected as it was with Milyukov and the Kadet party.
—–
— Kennan, ibid, pp. 176-7.
It is surprising if Crane in December 1917 was being low-key about support for Milyukov, since the Constitutional Democrats had only won 4.7% of the vote in the November elections which had just been held. The Social Revolutionaries, by contrast, won 40.4% in the Russian areas and 7.7% in the Ukrainian regions. The overall tallies can be found in Richard Pipes, The Russian Revolution, p. 542. There was nothing odd about Thompson attempting to align with the SRs and Kerensky as a more valid political option than the CDs.
It isn’t confined to South Front either. Every Russian source I regularly go to seems to line up with the Jewish narratives.
Ludicrous. Perhaps you haven’t’ discovered you are a Shabbos Goy yet.
However, this introduces a key paradox: as soon as external involvement becomes apparent (through the involvement of the diaspora, propaganda, or political statements by Western officials), the protests lose legitimacy in the eyes of Iranians. That’s because they are seen not as an internal social process but as a tool of external pressure. In the context of prolonged sanctions and so-called “hybrid pressure,” this perception only intensifies.As a result, protests in Iran are caught in a bind: without external support, they fail to instigate significant political change, yet with too much outside backing, they risk losing their domestic appeal. This largely explains why the recent waves of protests, despite drawing international attention, have had only limited political impact.This is practically an endorsement of the riots, with no explanation of the mechanisms of covert action. There IS NOT explicit mention in this article of US and Israeli involvement. There's no mention of Trump's threats, no mention of US war preparations. One could almost argue that Russian coverage is MORE PRO-ZIONIST more PRO-TRUMP than American coverage!https://www.rt.com/news/630957-disorder-instead-of-protest-iran/Replies: @JPS, @Poupon Marx
The unprecedented mass resignation of six federal prosecutors in MI would seem to be pretty solid circumstantial evidence that the MFOB’s DOJ is acting in bad faith in the aftermath of the shooting of Renee Good.
If there was any merit to the claim that Ross was actually struck by the SUV driven by Good, intentionally or not, the MFOB’s DOJ henchmen likely wouldn’t be doing things like refusing to cooperate with MI authorities, demanding an investigation into the background of Becca Good, apparently so as to dig up any “dirt” on her that might be useful in portraying the victim in a bad light, i.e. as someone who would assault an ICE agent, etc.
https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/federal-prosecutors-minnesota-resign-joe-thompson/
Make that MN not MI.
The unprecedented mass resignation of six federal prosecutors in MI...
You know Rurik, every man has a breaking point - beyond which he'll crack.
But it’s blatant now, that he [Jesse Ventura] is a shameless whore looking to cash in once again, by betraying the people of Minnesota, and the country.
Replies: @Rurik
Summary: That was PURE GOLD. I never tire of watching that.
I urge all UR readers to make time to watch all 11 mins of it.There will ALWAYS be a place in my heart for Jesse Ventura - the Ventura of bygone years.
Hey TruthV,
I’m aware of all you say about David Irving. I used to visit his website often, back when he had that roguish looking guy, and spoke so often about the ‘traditional enemies of free speech. I followed the trial, where Stephan Spielberg and other wealthy Jews poured millions into it, to effect the outcome, (which they did). I remember how in contempt and mockery, he refereed to the judge as “Mein Fuhrer”. That was classic.
On a side note, I also used to visit the site of another guy back in the day; John ‘the Birdman’ Bryant, [RIP]
https://www.big-lies.org/jews/bryant-case-against-jews-mensa.html
And way back when, he and David Irving had a tiff. It was minor, I merely bring it up because it was part of what I was reading back then, and it gives me a chance to cite Bryant, who was a Mesa guy, and also a brave soul, two things that rarely go together.
I don’t blame these people, like Irving or Ventura, (and God knows how many thousands of others), when they temper their language, to protect their families. I also saw when Jessie was speaking the truth on Fox, when that ninny got all huffy. I too had great admiration for Ventura back then. I didn’t like when he took the ten million shekels, to stop speaking the truth, but at least he admitted what he did, so at least there was that.
But now, TruthV, now he is going full-blown ZOG in his campaign to reenter the halls of ZOG power. There is a simmering war going on between ZOG and the Old School, anti-war, anti-intervention, and conservative values America – like no more ZOG wars. Kind of a continuation of the war between Pat Buchanan vs. the neocons, (David Frum, et al) who now also have all the forces of woke on their side.
The battle lines on that war were Jan 6th, a short time ago, when ZOG was claiming all those protesters were all treasonous insurrectionists, attempting a violent overthrow of our Republic.
Today, the battle line is immigration, and ‘Is every single person on the planet, a de-facto American citizen’. Or, at least, all the non-white ones, (white Australians or Germans or the Irish, would not be allowed to just walk in and demand gibs), but according to Ventura, every illegal immigrant in the U.S., is automatically an American citizen, entitled to Constitutional protections. This is not only stupid, it’s treason. When you give an invading army, (not a few people, but tens of millions), material comfort and support.
He knows what he’s doing, TruthV. He’s aligning with ZOG, in it’s war with the last gasps of conservative America, whose values are the Constitution, (just as Ron Paul has heroically defended), in order to bolster Ventura’s own, personal ambitions. And that makes me sick, because like you, I used to admire the guy.
If David Irving came out and said he was wrong all along about WWII, and that it was the Germans who were evil, who started it all, because they were full of hate for all others, and also, that in Gaza, the victims, the Israels, are only trying to defend themselves’ from Arab terrorists’..
..would you still have respect for David Irving?
Because that’s how I see Ventura’s antics now. It’s shameless pandering to ZOG-left, with disgusting lies about Jan 6th, and illegal invaders. He’s throwing gasoline on the immigration issue, for his own ambitions.
The reason we all used to like him, is because he was independent, and hated both the Republicans and the Democrats. He used to be his own man, and now he’s morphed into a Liz Cheney clone, in a blatant attempt at returning to ZOG’s good graces, and person power.
Y
Tldr
Ron as you havevrepsztedly pointed out in exhilarating detail our republics been dead for 80 ish years id argue since lincoln
Im again disappointed in trump but shame on me for thinking again political solutions might be possible
But assuming trump has an autonomous bone in his body how the fuck can you fault him for recognizing we have for decades lived in the law is what power says it is land
I mean at least for once in that 80 years its being exercised by the controlled right because we all know since that damned lincoln the other rule has been only the left decides
“Heartfelt appeal to the authorities: PLEASE, continue to keep Richard Hanania and John Podhoretz well away from the elementary school children.”
-Buckley Carlson
https://twitter.com/buckleycarlson/status/2011454016614760550
A Soviet Joke:
“What’s the difference between capitalism and socialism?”
Answer: “In capitalism, man exploits man. In socialism, it’s the other way around.”
Long ago I heard that this joke was very popular under a similar guise:
Instead of “man exploits man” it was “dog eats dog“.
I have spent many years following the Unz Review and many other sites and I think I have been able to operate beyond appearances. Furthermore in the realm of politics we do not necessarily have many years to make intelligent choices and decisions.Replies: @Felpudinho
It takes many years of study, practice to be able to understand and operate beyond appearances.
Look at this short video of his response to a question by a Russian reporter about Trump and Netanyahu’s designs against Iran. If this does not persuade you that Putin is a paper tiger and completely disloyal to his own allies then I would just have to say you are totally blind:
I watched that short video and it proved nothing more that Putin was intelligent enough not to answer a journalist’s hypothetical question that, if answered, would only help the USA/Israel in their decision making.
“If Trump and/or Israel murders Iranian leader “X” what will you do?” is a question all prudent politicians would never answer. It’s far better to keep them guessing, except on the big issues such as nuclear war. In regards to that Putin made it crystal clear, during the outset of their SMO in Ukraine, that all decisions have already been made if America/NATO attacks Russia and their pre-planned responses will be automatic; they won’t have to waste a second pondering what is best to do.
I did see the video from different angles posted in X. The ICE officer was not within the line of the car.
The facts on the ground should be well debated in a court of law once all evidences are exposed.
“Do you still believe Chauvin was leaning on Floyd’s neck?”
From a video that I watched, it looked like Chauvin was totally innocent of all charges against him. The video recorded all the standoff with Floyd, maybe from the helmet camera of one of the policemen involved. But the media had already pronounced Chauvin guilty and the court procedure did not base itself on real evidence. Chauvin’s trial was political.
“ you’re seeing this shooting through ideological lenses.”
I regret to inform you that I do not subscribe to any political ideology. Having lived long enough to see how authorities behave in so many different countries, I found myself with maturity drawn to the side of anarchy. Still I believe in the right of everyone to a fair trial even though the judiciary is by and large corrupt in America.
Read the case of Martin Armstrong with the New York courts and it should be an eye opener.
First of all, there were no "demographic consequences" under Stalin. Stalin murdered tens of millions of people, but Russians had tens of millions of children at the same time, so the population actually grew slightly. What made Stalin's murders bad wasn't the "demographic consequences." It was the murders!
Putin and the Russian leaders have argued that the 1990s were probably the worst period for Russians in centuries, even worse that the Stalin era of the 1930s, and given the demographic consequences of that former decade they might have a point.
Sure, sure, sure, we're always on the "verge" of collapse and yet somehow never do. Let me know when the collapse actually happens. And by "collapse", I don't mean the stock market going down 50%. The stock market repeatedly goes down 50%, then up 500%, then down 50%, then up 500%. That's not "collapse."
A few months ago, Holland seized control of Nexperia, a Chinese company, and the angry Chinese cut off the supply of its chip-products. As a result, most of the Western auto manufacturers were on the verge of having to shutdown until the Chinese relented.
No, I'm arguing that Russia has no good options. It sucks to be weak in a world ruled by force.
So you’re arguing that Russia should basically surrender to America. But the Neocons who were the ones behind the war have publicly declared that they want to break Russia up into a number of smaller, very weak states, and they also clearly want Russia to return to the 1990s, when the country was totally looted and pillaged by the Jewish Oligarchs.
I think we're at an impasse. We may actually be fairly close in our assessments of Russia's strengths and weaknesses. But we're nowhere near close in our opinions about America's strengths and weaknesses. And we likely never will be because it's hard to be objective about our own country.Replies: @Eugene Kusmiak
But if the only other option you offer is that Russia surrender and probably be destroyed, I can’t see why they wouldn’t do so [fight NATO].
I should not have downplayed the economic difficulties that Russia had in the 1990s as much as I did in my comment. After living their whole lives under the system of “They pretend to pay us and we pretend to work”, I’m sure the post-Soviet economy came as a shock to most people. Private employers didn’t pretend to pay people who pretended to work. This must have seemed like a betrayal of the whole “social contract”, especially to the elderly who couldn’t adapt to the new ways.
And I’m sure the gulag jailers still miss the good old days.
Old Soviet jokes:
“How do you double the efficiency of a Soviet factory?”
Answer: “Close it.”
“Is it true that our workers are the most productive in the world?”
Answer: “Yes. But what they produce is mostly shortages.”
“What happens if socialism comes to the Sahara?”
Answer: “A sand shortage.”
“Why do Soviet cars have heated rear windows?”
Answer: “To keep your hands warm while you push.”
“Is it true that socialism will triumph when every worker has a car?”
Answer: “Yes, but the car will be a police car, and it will be following him.”
“Is it true that Rabinovich won a car in the lottery?”
Answer: “Yes, but it was not a car, it was a bicycle. And he didn’t win it, he stole it.”
“Is it true that the Soviet Union has the best medical care in the world?”
Answer: “Yes, but unfortunately the patients are not as good.”
“What’s the difference between capitalism and socialism?”
Answer: “In capitalism, man exploits man. In socialism, it’s the other way around.”
Long ago I heard that this joke was very popular under a similar guise:
“What’s the difference between capitalism and socialism?”
Answer: “In capitalism, man exploits man. In socialism, it’s the other way around.”
If you ask an Indian what Pakistan is really like, you will not get an accurate picture.
Soviet Union
Yes, only Whitey stole from Native Americans not Mexico. lol. Whitey stole the land that Mexico stole from the Injuns. Seeing wetbacks claiming to be “Natives” is hilarious.
I’ll tell that to my two half-Mexican cousins (sisters) the next time they say, “We didn’t cross the border, the border crossed us!”
Those two are friggin’ idiots, cute little maxims like the border-crossing saying is about all they got out of a tens-of-thousands of dollar “education” in Chicano & Woman’s Studies at UC Davis. Needless to say, they’re in their 50’s and still relying on their dear ol’ mom & dad for $$.
Well, I think there are something like 5-6 different videos, all taken from different angles.
There are no “battling videos”. There are several different angles showing the agent in front of the vehicle being struck. It’s disingenuous to claim the proof in front of everyone’s eyes isn’t real. The agent is clearly struck, the hole in the windshield is from the front. Why is there even an argument about this?
You don’t know me, I’m sure you don’t notice my comments on here, but I’m not a “trumpista”. Trump is too left of center for me, but he is better than every democrat politician in the country. As for the videos, yes, they are different angles. Are you arguing that the video of the agent being hit by the vehicle is a fake? That all the agents that have said he was hit and put it in their reports are lying? I don’t understand it. There’s a video showing him get hit. How is there any argument about this? I don’t get it.
From the video, it looks as if he did and still got clipped or brushed by the left side of the car. He obviously could have been knocked over and run over by her left front wheel - and more.
Why didn’t the officer jump out of the way?
Why didn’t the officer jump out of the way?
I meant this as a rhetorical question, I was agreeing with you that it’s a silly thing to ask.
I don’t even think it matters much whether she meant to hit him or whether she did hit him. What matters is she forced him to make a split second decision by ramming an SUV in his face.
I think what most likely happened is that she got an adrenaline rush after the butchdyke said “drive, baby, drive” and then pictured herself as some Marvel hero, bursting through the horde of faceless bad guys, probably with the musical score flourishing in the background. Too bad, she should have stayed home and watched Netflix instead.
https://komonews.com/news/nation-world/far-left-groups-are-behind-the-funding-of-anti-ice-protests-in-minnesota-report-new-york-post-renee-good-immigration-dchttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indivisible_movementThe group is run by Leah Greenberg (age 38) and Ezra Levin (age 39). So it appears I was correct when I said the following:
One of the groups allegedly funding the protests is called Indivisible Twin Cities, which is a branch of the anti-Trump group called the Indivisible Project based in Washington, D.C.This group was also reportedly behind the “No Kings” protests that happened around the U.S. last year that reportedly received millions of dollars from Soros’ Open Society Foundations between 2018 and 2023.
Soros appears to have stopped funding the group in 2023. And I doubt the Chabad Lubavitchers who run the Trump White House will allow these protests to gain ground until after Iran is destroyed. So, for now, these anti-ICE protests will fail.Replies: @Lawrence Erickson
Therefore, I suspect the organizers and financial benefactors of these anti-ICE protests are probably Gentiles. Maybe some younger Jews just getting their feet wet. Until masked Antifa-type agents show up with metal rods and Molotov cocktails, and the black rioting and looting starts, it’s clear the Jewish big wigs haven’t put the big dollars into these protests yet.
[facepalm]There is no legal or moral basis for treating the opinion of a mind-reader as grounds for mitigating or reducing a well-founded charge of willful murder.Replies: @Lawrence Erickson
I think what most likely happened is that she got an adrenaline rush after the butchdyke said “drive, baby, drive” …
Weren't you same ziokikes shouting "don't stand in traffic" a few years ago? Fuck off, Hasbaras.
I don’t even think it matters much whether she meant to hit him or whether she did hit him. What matters is she forced him to make a split second decision by ramming an SUV in his face.
There are no “battling videos”. There are several different angles showing the agent in front of the vehicle being struck. It’s disingenuous to claim the proof in front of everyone’s eyes isn’t real. The agent is clearly struck, the hole in the windshield is from the front. Why is there even an argument about this?
Well, I think there are something like 5-6 different videos, all taken from different angles.
The one you highlight appears to show that the car hit the ICE agent, which seems rather implausible since he afterwards showed not the slightest sign of any physical injury. But because of the positioning of the camera, what actually happened is far from clear.
Meanwhile, all the other videos taken from different angles seem to show that the car never touched him.
Naturally, you and all the ignorant Trumpists promote the one apparently misleading video and ignore all the others.
Like I said, I haven’t been paying much attention to those details or analyzing the various videos. I’m not all that interested in the topic.
But for those who are, I’d just recommended that they watch some of the different videos and make up their own minds. I think they where included included in those much longer YouTube and Twitter videos that I’d embedded in my article.
Hmm…
The one you highlight appears to show that the car hit the ICE agent, which seems rather implausible since he afterwards showed not the slightest sign of any physical injury. But because of the positioning of the camera, what actually happened is far from clear.
Wait, we need a second opinion! Please forward those CT scans to our resident armchair biomechanical/accident reconstruction expert to examine… from his armchair!
ICE agent who shot Renee Good suffered internal bleeding, officials say
By Nicole Sganga, Jennifer Jacobs
Updated on: January 14, 2026
The Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent who fatally shot Renee Good last week in Minneapolis, Jonathan Ross, suffered internal bleeding to the torso following the incident, according to two U.S. officials briefed on his medical condition…
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ice-officer-who-shot-renee-good-internal-injuries-sources-say/
Replies: @Antiwar7, @Truth Vigilante, @Ron Unz
https://static01.nyt.com/images/2016/01/14/us/15harvard-web1/15harvard-web1-superJumbo.jpg
I looked it up: US national debt was $3.2 trillion in 1990 before Bush the Elder did a war on Iraq rather than negotiate Iraq out of Kuwait. Current US debt is $39.1 trillion. What’s happened in those years: wars. I count it as a war when the US bombs a counry.
That debt is a bigger problem than immigration, if immigration is a problem at all. Farming would grind to a halt without illegal immigrants. Same for other industries. Impoverishing Americans so that they’ll work in slaughterhouses, meat packing, farms, home healthcare, cleaning restaurants, etc. is a crazy idea.
These Americans are already "impoverished," but they can sit on their ass and receive endless welfare (Shhh! don't let the blacks, Mexicans and Muslims know about this). Cut the welfare, especially the free food, to make it where in order to eat you have to work, and, after a few missed meals, the deadbeats will be lining up around the block to work those crummy jobs you listed. And if all those new service jobs can't survive without the use of cheap third-world labor - jobs such as delivering food - then let those new jobs fall by the wayside. We got along before those jobs came along and we'll get along without them.
Impoverishing Americans so that they’ll work in slaughterhouses, meat packing, farms, home healthcare, cleaning restaurants, etc. is a crazy idea.
I agree with the response of JPS and I think you are way overthinking things and grasping for rationalizations to excuse the behavior of a man you clearly deeply admire. I don’t know why you are being so hostile. I’ve written that Putin is a genius. He has many fine qualities. However you are unwilling to admit the obvious which is that he is deeply deferential to Jewish power. And your example about the oligarchs is completely irrelevant. He did not oppose them because they were Jewish but because they lacked sufficient Russian nationalism and were doing things to harm the Russian economy and society. This in fact seems to be the difference between someone like Putin and someone like you who wants to immediately castigate Jews in sweeping generalization while Putin is able to appreciate them as a group while opposing the policies of some of them individually.
Look at this short video of his response to a question by a Russian reporter about Trump and Netanyahu’s designs against Iran. If this does not persuade you that Putin is a paper tiger and completely disloyal to his own allies then I would just have to say you are totally blind:
https://youtube.com/shorts/R_OERDK2KkM
Incidentally many people claim that the real Putin was killed and we are seeing a substitute imposter. I think you will admit that there seems to be a world of difference between the Putin in the video you posted confronting the oligarchs and this (((Putin))) who is a pussycat a paper tiger and a dishonest wimp. Even allowing for aging I don’t think the two men look at all similar:
It takes many years of study, practice to be able to understand and operate beyond appearances.
I have spent many years following the Unz Review and many other sites and I think I have been able to operate beyond appearances. Furthermore in the realm of politics we do not necessarily have many years to make intelligent choices and decisions.
I watched that short video and it proved nothing more that Putin was intelligent enough not to answer a journalist's hypothetical question that, if answered, would only help the USA/Israel in their decision making. "If Trump and/or Israel murders Iranian leader "X" what will you do?" is a question all prudent politicians would never answer. It's far better to keep them guessing, except on the big issues such as nuclear war. In regards to that Putin made it crystal clear, during the outset of their SMO in Ukraine, that all decisions have already been made if America/NATO attacks Russia and their pre-planned responses will be automatic; they won't have to waste a second pondering what is best to do.
Look at this short video of his response to a question by a Russian reporter about Trump and Netanyahu’s designs against Iran. If this does not persuade you that Putin is a paper tiger and completely disloyal to his own allies then I would just have to say you are totally blind:
The car was moving forward for no more than a second before it struck him. He had no time to determine its speed, and a 4,500 lb. hunk of metal does not have to be going very fast to seriously injure or kill someone.
She wasn’t going fast enough that he’d be afraid.
He was filming her with his phone. ICE agents are instructed to document their interactions as much as possible and he was moving to her side to get her on camera.Replies: @OldRelic
No one who defends the ICE guy has an explanation for why he went to the driver side window
Gee, that’s a great explanation – He moved to the driver side window and shot her twice more in the head because he was filming. Huh?
Every shot has to be justified. That’s common sense. Its not like in the movies.
I believe this video will go a long way in clearing up the matter.
Here’s a video clip of Nick Fuentes giving his unsympathetic two-cents worth on Renée Good’s demise:
If he got hit by the front of the car, would he still be standing steady enough to fire 3 shots accurately and in quick succession?Have you ever seen a person struck by a car first hand? I have. The person was 3 feet away from me. The impact flung her onto the windshield, hit her head on the windshield, then rolled off the car. Then lying on the street, she foamed at the mouth for 10 minutes before the ambulance arrived. She died later in hospital.The ICE agent was certainly not struck by the car. If he did, the momentum from a 5000 pound SUV would have sent him flying. After he got to his feet again, it would have taken him yet more seconds to compose himself enough to shoot off a close 3 shot grouping on the windshield.Have you ever fired a rifle after physical activity, or urgent physical activity such as this? For example firing the rifle after one runs down 200 metres at the shooting range? One has to force himself to stay steady, compose himself and control his breath so that his breathing doesn't cause his rounds to fly all over the place.If the ICE agent had really been struck by the car, he would not have fired his shots so soon, and his shots would have been far more erratic than that.Replies: @Rich, @wojtek
How did he get hit by the front of the car and fire through the windshield?
Look, the video shows him being struck by the car. If that’s not enough for you guys, nothing is. You just want, or need, to believe that this woman was killed in cold blood. I’m sure you were all-in on hands up, knee on neck, out getting skittles, too. If you can’t see the agent getting hit in the video, there’s just nothing else to argue about. You live in an alternate reality.
you're right about the skittles and the knee-jerk sympathies of the ((media))
If you can’t see the agent getting hit in the video, there’s just nothing else to argue about. You live in an alternate reality.
LOL.A friend of mine was convicted of assault on a police officer some years back. Do you know what she did? She was stopped by a police woman for a minor violation like not wearing a seat belt. After being handed a written citation, my friend crushed the citation and threw it out the window, while muttering something like "You guys have nothing better to do. Go catch some speeding car or some robbers, but instead you catch an old lady for not wearing a seatbelt". Maybe the balled up citation touched the police woman. But she in court she testified that the ball of paper hit her and caused her injury.It is clear that the only thing damaged in the encounter was the policewoman's ego for not being shown sufficient deference.My friend was lucky she was stopped by ICE agents. She would have been shot for sure.Replies: @Same old same old
Look, the video shows him being struck by the car.
I'll admit I haven't really paid much to these "battling videos" on the Internet but looking at the one you posted, I'm pretty sure it's totally misleading.
I don’t know if anyone has posted this here yet, but the video in this tweet, which looks like it was taken from one of the nearby yards, clearly shows the vehicle striking the officer, quite hard.
There are no “battling videos”. There are several different angles showing the agent in front of the vehicle being struck. It’s disingenuous to claim the proof in front of everyone’s eyes isn’t real. The agent is clearly struck, the hole in the windshield is from the front. Why is there even an argument about this?
Napolitano, and most of his guests, have gone completely off the rails in the quest for more clicks. They’ve been wrong on every prediction they make and are now outright lying about facts they don’t like. But that seems to be the norm now, as can be seen in the comments here where video showing the agent being struck is dismissed because it doesn’t fit the narrative. Hands up, knee on neck, skittles land.
Well, I think there are something like 5-6 different videos, all taken from different angles.
There are no “battling videos”. There are several different angles showing the agent in front of the vehicle being struck. It’s disingenuous to claim the proof in front of everyone’s eyes isn’t real. The agent is clearly struck, the hole in the windshield is from the front. Why is there even an argument about this?
How about this? After Greenland, Trump could go for Iceland.
https://www.rt.com/news/630935-trump-grenland-iceland-krapivnik/
I will post a video as reference to why Adolph HAD to promote war.
Poupy, I can’t understand how, on the one hand you acknowledge the existence of the Zionist International Deep State Oligarchs (aka ZOG), and the degree of death and depravity they cause, and yet, for some unfathomable reason, you can’t see that Malignant International Jewry manoeuvred/intimidated/bribed western politicians and other heads of state to create the circumstances that would INEVITABLY lead to WWII* – with the express intention of destroying NSDAP Germany.
(*In fact this is just as true in relation to the circumstances relating to the outbreak of WWI).
Adolf Hitler had the FORESIGHT to see what was being done to Germany many years before becoming Chancellor. In accordance with that knowledge, he armed his nation in advance as a means of countering what he knew was coming.
Absent all the Jewish chicanery, there WOULD HAVE BEEN NO OUTBREAK OF WWII (at least not between Germany and the western powers).
But, seeing as Stalin sought the conquest of western Europe and the expansion of the Soviet Empire, war with the Jewish Bolshevik evil empire could not be avoided.
So Hitler did what was necessary to secure the safety and future prosperity of the Deutsches Volk as best he could.
Got it now Poupy? Do you understand the correlation between Cause and Effect?
Malignant International Jewry’s number one priority, as early as the late 19th/early 20th century, was the elimination and subjugation of a rival hegemon to the Anglo-Zionist empire.
Germany was that up and coming Industrial Colossus that, left unchecked, could become the preeminent economic power on the planet.
(Hitler saw what was being done to his nation during WWI, and it was doubly reinforced by the continuation of the post Armistice blockade of food supplies that resulted in countless hundreds of thousands of fellow Germans starving for nothing).
If that wasn’t proof enough, we have the unjust and crushing provisions/reparations imposed by the Treaty of Versailles.
ALL OF THIS made it evident that the Talmudic misfits wanted to pummel Germany into the turf once and for all.
In other words, all of the above came FIRST, and Hitler’s efforts to ensure the security of his nation (through a military build up), came SECOND.
Poupy, on some issues you’re very well informed indeed.
But as far as WWII is concerned, you’ve been thoroughly duped by the Jewish propaganda.
You’ve swallowed the near entirety of their B.S by watching the ZOG controlled History Channel and endless reruns of Swindlers List.
You are BADLY in need of an education on WWII – because right now you are clueless.
You would do well do re-read all of the articles on this conflict and on the Holohoax posted by Ron Unz over the years. That will get you up to speed.
And last, but certainly most, you need to read all of John Wear’s brilliant book ‘Germany’s War’.
(Which you can read in this webzine for free – due to Mr Unz’s magnanimity in paying John Wear for the rights to publish his book here):
https://www.unz.com/book/john_wear__germanys-war/