> He reported that some officials believed certain documents Pollard gave Israel were of practical importance to the USSR

That misinformation originates from Ames.

https://aish.com/48899682/

—–
The CIA put Aldrich Ames in charge of investigating Pollard for a damage assessment. Ames began fabricating a secret file that cast blame on Israel for selling to the KGB the data it had received from Pollard. Then Ames leaked to the press allegations that the information Pollard fed Israel included the secret codes for American agents working in the Soviet Union, thus endangering their lives…

Ames’s web of allegations against Pollard assumed that Pollard, a GS-12 security analyst, had access to such top-secret CIA data as the “huge national security agency compendium of frequencies” and the codes of American spies working in the Soviet Union. All intelligence experts knew that Pollard was too low level an analyst to have had any access to such data. As Codevilla pointed out: “Jonathan Pollard could not have provided codes, because he did not have any access to codes. GS-12 analysts don’t.” [7]

Former Justice Department attorney John Loftus explained: “In order to hide his own espionage for the Russians, Ames successfully pointed the finger of suspicion at Pollard for the spate of serious leaks that crippled U.S. networks inside the Soviet Union.” [8]

Loftus went on to say: “Several investigations from CIA and NIS [Naval Investigative Service] have made sheepish admission that Pollard was the victim of hysterical over-reaction.” Loftus quoted Naval Intelligence sources as admitting that “90 percent of the things we accused [Pollard] of stealing, he didn’t even have access to.” [9]
—–

Although Ames was caught in 1994, Hanssen wasn’t caught until 2001. That will have continued to influence articles produced in the 1990s, even after Ames had been caught.

In reality, nothing pertinent to the USSR came from Pollard.

Hersh never claimed that Pollard delivered materials directly to the USSR. His argument was more subtle:

• He reported that some officials believed certain documents Pollard gave Israel were of practical importance to the USSR, meaning that if the Soviets somehow obtained them (directly or via Israel), they would gain a strategic advantage.
• Hersh’s article focused on the potential utility of Pollard’s materials to Soviet intelligence, not on actual delivery.
• The later arrests of Ames and Hanssen showed that most verified Soviet gains came from them, but this does not contradict the claims made by some officials about the intrinsic value of Pollard’s documents.

So, Hersh’s statement remains factually correct in terms of the documents’ content, even if actual Soviet espionage losses were dominated by Ames and Hanssen.

> According to some officials…

This was written for January 10, 1999. Robert Hanssen was only caught on February 20, 2001. The “some officials” that are involved here will have not only included Hanssen personally, but people who had been duped by the false leads planted by both Hanssen and Aldrich Ames (who had been caught earlier in 1994). In reality, nothing pertinent to the USSR came from Pollard. It came from Ames and Hanssen and was blamed on Pollard as a diversion. That has all become clear since Hanssen was arrested in 2001.

Jonathan Pollard gave information to Israeli contacts about Arabs, but he knew absolutely nothing about CIA contacts in the USSR.

This is misdirection. You haven’t addressed the crux of what Hersh and others have alleged:

According to some officials… a significant percentage of Pollard’s documents, including some that described the techniques the American Navy used to track Soviet submarines around the world, was of practical importance only to the Soviet Union

According to ChatGPT:

Former Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger emphasized in court that Pollard’s disclosures caused “immense” damage, and others in the intelligence community argued that the submarine-tracking information was particularly dangerous, since it could compromise America’s ability to monitor Soviet naval movements.

While Pollard and his supporters insisted he only spied for Israel, critics maintained that some of what he handed over ended up in Soviet hands, either through intelligence trade or leaks.

Do you even know what these cases were about? One doesn’t have to support Pollard spying for Israel (which he was guilty of) in order to grasp that Pollard was not the one who gave the Soviet KGB data that allowed them to round up CIA spies. That was done by Ames and Hanssen, and the historical record of the future will support this fact.

The reality remains that it was Aldrich Ames and Robert Hanssen who informed Soviet intelligence in 1980s about CIA contacts. Jonathan Pollard gave information to Israeli contacts about Arabs, but he knew absolutely nothing about CIA contacts in the USSR. When Hersh was writing a piece in the late 1990s, Ames had been caught in 1994, but Hanssen would not be caught until 2001. As a result, the story which was fed to Hersh through CIA contacts still reflected the distortions of the original Soviet propaganda which aimed to deflect attention from Ames and Hanssen.

Gosh, Patsy-this ‘aish’ sure seems kosher. A sort of imitation Chabad, designed to spread ‘…timeless Jewish wisdom”..’, around the world. Colour me CON-vinced.

It was Ames and Hanssen who gave it to the KGB and then circulated a rumor to incriminate Pollard.

Earth to McShmooley, it’s 2025. You’re late by three years in your efforts to make gaslighting word of the year, lol.

“gaslighting” was named Merriam-Webster’s Word of the Year for 2022.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/arts/gaslighting-is-merriam-websters-2022-word-of-the-year#:~:text=Merriam-Webster%20has%20chosen%20%22gaslighting%22%20as%20its,word%20of%20the%20year%20for%202022.

> the officials that shared their views with Hersh were also probably unaware

Or else simply covering their own past mistakes. The fact that Aldrich Ames and Robert Hanssen were the ones who gave the USSR intelligence which enabled them to capture people whom the CIA had been using for its network:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/aldrich-ames-captured-spies-punishments-1.7100439

—–
“The reason that Ames is going to die in prison is that his betrayal led directly to the deaths of the dozen or so Soviet and Soviet bloc recruited foreign agents that had worked for the United States going back to the 1960s,” said journalist Tim Weiner, co-author of Betrayal: The Story of Aldrich Ames, an American Spy…

In February 2001, Robert Hanssen, a 25-year FBI veteran, was arrested and charged with espionage. He died in prison last year at age 79, while serving a life sentence.

In exchange for a mix of diamonds and cash, Hanssen gave up valuable American secrets to Moscow — including names of people working for the U.S., some of whom Ames had separately disclosed.
—–

It was Aldrich Ames who was put in charge of Pollard’s case after the arrest on November 22, 1985, and it was Ames who fabricated the charges of Pollard having allegedly sent information which dealt with US agents in the USSR. Although Pollard legally charged with this, the assumption became widespread and only started to fall apart Ames had been caught. Ames made the claim that somehow Pollard had access to top-secret CIA data which involved codes of US spies in the USSR. Pollard never possessed such data, but Ames and Hanssen did. It was Ames and Hanssen who gave it to the KGB and then circulated a rumor to incriminate Pollard.

Hersh simply didn’t take into account the newer information about Aldrich Ames and Robert Hanssen and therefore continued with the presumption that an Israeli agent had somehow given something from Pollard to the Soviets.

Oh, I see. So, the officials that shared their views with Hersh were also probably unaware of this so-called “newer information,” right?

Excerpt from New Yorker intro to Hersh’s article, The Traitor:

A number of officials strongly suspect that the Israelis repackaged much of Pollard’s material and provided it to the Soviet Union in exchange for continued Soviet permission for Jews to emigrate to Israel. Other officials go further, and say there was reason to believe that secret information was exchanged for Jews working in highly sensitive positions in the Soviet Union. A significant percentage of Pollard’s documents, including some that described the techniques the American Navy used to track Soviet submarines around the world, was of practical importance only to the Soviet Union

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1999/01/18/the-traitor

Hersh simply didn’t take into account the newer information about Aldrich Ames and Robert Hanssen and therefore continued with the presumption that an Israeli agent had somehow given something from Pollard to the Soviets.

https://web.archive.org/web/20141103074645/http://www.cbsnews.com/news/a-not-so-secret-tunnel/

—–
Arrested last month, Hanssen has been accused of spying for Moscow since 1985. He has been accused of giving the Soviets – and later the Russians – secrets that included names of double agents, as well as U.S. electronic surveillance methods.
—–

In reality, Pollard never had access to the type of information which was relevant for capturing those CIA spies who were caught because of Ames and Hanssen.

https://aish.com/48900367/

—–
Sy had his leg pulled on Pollard by his CIA sources, as a result of which Sy published a story in the New Yorker in January 1999 claiming that these radio guides were just about the crown jewels of U.S. intelligence. The truth is that certain portions of the guide had already been sold to the Soviets by the Walker spy ring, according to courtroom testimony, which also revealed that the Soviets thought so little of the guides’ value that they did not even bother to ask their top spies, Ames and Hanssen, to steal the remainder of the set. Moreover, as previously noted, the government’s own damage assessment report originally concluded that the loss of the guides was a minor matter.
—–

To those who are sympathetic to attempts to mitigate the damage done by Pollard, I encourage them to read this response from ChatGPT:

Great question — this is where much of the mythos around Jonathan Pollard takes off beyond the courtroom record. Seymour Hersh’s 1999 New Yorker article (“The Traitor”) is the single most influential account tying Pollard’s espionage to Moscow, and it explains why, even decades later, people talk about Pollard in the context of U.S.–Soviet intelligence battles. Let me break this down in depth.
⸻
1. Hersh’s central claim

Hersh argued that Israeli intelligence services, particularly the Lakam (Bureau of Scientific Relations) that ran Pollard, did not keep all of Pollard’s haul to themselves. Instead, some of the most valuable U.S. intelligence—especially concerning Soviet military systems—was allegedly bartered to Moscow.

The alleged purpose:
• To secure Soviet Jewish emigration concessions (Israel wanted more Soviet Jews allowed to leave for Israel).
• To gain other strategic or diplomatic benefits from Moscow during a tense Cold War period.
⸻
2. Basis of Hersh’s reporting

Hersh cited multiple unnamed U.S. intelligence officials, including people who had direct access to damage assessments. According to these sources:
• Content matched Soviet interests: Pollard’s take included details on U.S. collection against Soviet submarines, air defenses, and nuclear capabilities—gold for Moscow’s military planners.
• Trade suspicion: U.S. analysts concluded it was unlikely Israel alone needed all of the material Pollard stole, but the Soviets certainly did. This fueled suspicions of a quid pro quo.
• Israeli-Soviet backchannels: By the late 1980s, Israel and the USSR were exploring ways to thaw relations, especially over Jewish emigration. Some U.S. officials believed Pollard’s material was a bargaining chip…

In short: Hersh’s 1999 article argued that Israel repackaged Pollard’s Soviet-focused intelligence for Moscow, turning a spy-for-an-ally case into a Cold War betrayal of the highest order. While this account has never been officially confirmed and remains contested, it provided a compelling narrative framework for why so many U.S. officials described Pollard’s crime as uniquely catastrophic.

Regarding JFK, the jig is up.

Take a look at the document highlighted below and ask yourself, why in the appendix is Shin Bet annotated?

Since the justification for the coup d’tat was treason from an Angelton mole in the Kremlin, ask yourself what’s the odds the mole was a fake Semite and connected to Ben Gurion?

https://ia800501.us.archive.org/26/items/operation-zipper/OperationZipper_text.pdf

It was Aldrich Ames, not Jonathan Pollard, who was behind the leaks to the Soviets. Pollard spied for Israel and that warrants punishment in itself. But the claim that Pollard had somehow given intelligence to the Soviets was a fake cover story pushed by Ames in order to shield himself.

https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20250424-how-aldrich-ames-became-the-uss-most-damaging-double-agent

—–
It was through Ames’s leaking of secret intelligence information that the KGB would identify virtually all of the CIA’s spies in the Soviet Union, effectively shutting down its US covert operations there. “I’m not aware of any other spy or mole in the US that has caused such a loss of human life in terms of human assets,” said Wiser. The sudden disappearance of so many CIA assets did raise alarms and trigger the search for the mole within the Agency in 1986, but Ames would continue to slip under the radar for the best part of a decade.
—–

https://aish.com/48900367/

—–
Pollard wasn’t the serial killer. The Jew didn’t do it. It was one of their own WASPs — Aldrich Ames, a drunken senior CIA official who sold the names of America’s agents to the Russians for cash. Pollard was framed for Ames’s crime, while Ames kept on drinking and spying for the Soviets for several more years. In fact, Israeli intelligence later suspected that Ames played a direct role in framing Pollard. But no one in America then knew the truth.
—–

Has there been any analysis of these findings in relation to the Israelis turning over to the Soviets the U.S. “SigInt Bible” they netted from Jonathan Pollard, in exchange for liberalizing Russian to Israel emigration?

And is there an overview of Jewish Russian dissidents’ actions furthering the anti-Palestinian “democide”, or some other term than genocide or ethnic cleansing to more accurately describe the Israelis’ mass death drive?

University of Hawaii “Democide” web page:
https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/

“Kill then all, utterly and completely.”

This is why a plan is urgently needed to defeat ZOG, and in the absence of anyone else developing and executing it, we need to.

It’s your free speech right to say that on social media, Luigi. Those Israelis are going DOWN! Their style is no match for your social media free speech!

I look forward to reading your planifesto.

It’s your free speech right to say that on social media

Actually, in our current ZOG occupation, the website owner could censor my speech in violation of both my rights and the Marsh vs Alabama 1946 supreme court’s ruling.

With the flick of a switch, this all disappears. So much for free speech today.

This is why a plan is urgently needed to defeat ZOG, and in the absence of anyone else developing and executing it, we need to.

But, you do you, your cowardice follows you. Your anonymity is your delusion alone.

No, you’re demonstrating that you have no experience being part of a team, much less leading one, that accomplished anything of significance.

It’s your free speech right to say that on social media. The pain, Will Robinson! The pain!

and remember I’m just blue-skying

No, you’re demonstrating that you have no experience being part of a team, much less leading one, that accomplished anything of significance.

ZOG is a global scourge. Many nations are used, the rich willingly complicit.

Freemasonry, the secret satanic pyramid scheme society, is its engine.

Talking about it won’t defeat them. It hasn’t for centuries. Insanity is defined as doing the same thing expecting different results.

We can, and must, develop a plan to defeat ZOG here and now, transparently and legally, to be shared and implemented through social media with free speech. Easily.

ZOG laughs at those too cowardly to do what is required to defeat it.

Good for you! With this kind of brainpower this time and working together through social media and free speech those Israeli bastards are going down!

After that, and remember I’m just blue-skying here but I’m thinking bring social media and free speech to bear on World Hunger for the next project. Should be a piece of cake.

ZOG is a global scourge. Many nations are used, the rich willingly complicit.

Freemasonry, the secret satanic pyramid scheme society, is its engine.

Talking about it won’t defeat them. It hasn’t for centuries. Insanity is defined as doing the same thing expecting different results.

We can, and must, develop a plan to defeat ZOG here and now, transparently and legally, to be shared and implemented through social media with free speech. Easily.

ZOG laughs at those too cowardly to do what is required to defeat it.

‘In 1986, then-U.S. Sen. Joe Biden said, “[Supporting Israel] is the best $3 billion investment we make. Were there not an Israel, the United States of America would have to invent an Israel to protect her interests in the region.” ‘?
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/joe-biden-1986-israel/

Yes technically he’s correct on that sentence. I just say “I could care less” habitually. But he’s still acting as a troll. And thankfully I’ve directed him to information that will educate him. He seems like a smart fellow.

It’s a comments section of a website. Best to focus on the arguments and information.

Apparently Free Speech has its limits.

You mean, people break the law when they get away with it.

One task in the plan to defeat ZOG is to ensure with law that social media czars don’t violate our constitutional rights.

The US Supreme Court has already ruled on this principle in Marsh vs Alabama 1946.

The scenario was a privately owned company town that wanted to censor free speech in its town square.

“ The more an owner, for his advantage, opens up his property for use by the public in general, the more do his rights become circumscribed by the statutory and constitutional rights of those who use it.”

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/326/501

I’m not on here calling people idiots and other names unprovoked.

That was the old dispensation. In the New Order Young Master Chalmers is as vitriolic as it gets, and as always see that bell? The binkie is just a ding-ding away. Take it easy Speed Racer.

For someone who doesn’t care you seem to have taken a quick tour of the literature. Good for you! With this kind of teamwork those Israeli bastards are going down!

Whatever. I’ve long since quit trying to keep track of the commenters’ various factions. But eah is right about “could care less” vs. “couldn’t care less.” Think about it.

LBJ’s devotion to Israel was firmly in place long before he succumbed to the Krim bawd. As a young man, he was intimately involved in smuggling arms to the Jewish terrorists carving out the state of Israel.

I don’t think that it’s “all of the JFK files”, but rather, the files from the Church Committee. It does not include all of the CIA files because they held back, Recall that the liaison for the CIA was the very person they denied had been CIA.

The point being, your vote counts less because you are so late to the party. There’s far too much of that hereabouts.

The assassination was boring? Suck it up, Chalmers.

Is it still a Zionist coup if LBJ was in on it?

Is it still a Zionist coup if Mafiosi were involved?

Is it still a Zionist coup if CIA were involved?

See the whole board. It sounds like you don’t understand confluence of interests.

“Zionist coup” is a clever phrased used by that Golovin guy. It’s hyperbole but I think it makes the point.

And yes, I think the plot had to involve LBJ. He greenlighted it and had to ensure the coverup went smoothly. Israel used people in its spheres of influence to carry out the assassination, including the CIA (primarily the Mossad mole Angleton), Lansky Syndicate, French Corisan mob/French OAS etc.

Seems to have been planned in part through elements in Permindex (subsidiary of a money laundering bank created by Tibor Rosenbaum, one of Mossad’s most important figures).

And if I’m wrong, who cares? To date, there’s no theory that’s coherent other than this one.

I’m not on here calling people idiots and other names unprovoked.

Read Roger Mattson’s full book and Grant F. Smith.

Seymour Hersh was wrong.

For the record this EAH fellow appears to be a big time troll. Reminds me of that Josh Johnson commenter. They just swarm like hornets around a commenter who makes a point on Israel’s involvement in JFK assassination/nuclear theft, 911 etc.

Nitpicking grammar and minutia etc.

Trolls are best ignored, but when they flood up Comments section with idiotic statements and obfuscation on topics as significant as the Israeli nuclear issue, Angleton, and the JFK Assassination, its best to point them out.

You’ve tried to diminish the strong evidence of Israel’s theft of America’s nuclear material on multiple and you previously attempted to diminish a significant JFK Assassination document on Israel’s nuclear weapons and their Jericho missiles development that I pointed out. DOCUMENT 104-10302-10028 in the 2025 JFK Release: https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2025/0318/104-10302-10028.pdf

There are 3 specific mentions of Israel that were redacted before March 2025, one of which I pasted here: https://www.unz.com/runz/how-israel-killed-the-kennedys/?showcomments#comment-7250004

What information have you pulled from the JFK documents that’s worth discussing?

Read Final Judgment and come back like a gentleman: https://www.unz.com/book/michael_collins_piper__final-judgment/

With regard to Seymour Hersh’s exoneration of Shapiro, Grant F. Smith and Roger Mattson showed that Hersh was entirely wrong on that. Michael Collins Piper also acknowledged Hersh was wrong on that.

But it is telling – you mention that Israel orchestrated the JFK and RFK assassinations and stole HEU from the United States (which they did) and the hornets swarm.

Guyenot and Unz have pinned the tail on the donkey with the assassination, in my opinion. Piper provides the the foundation, so I hope you read it as soon as possible.

Quote:

“The point being, I could have cared less about the assassination.”

If you “could” have cared less, why didn’t you?

Just wondering…

>The point being, I could have cared less about the assassination.

The correct expression is could not have cared less.

Think about it.

For anyone interested, the key paragraphs from the article about HEU ‘leased’ to NUMEC and found after audits to be unaccounted for, are below the more tag.

Building a ‘weapon’, e.g. a missile, to deliver a nuclear warhead is not the same as designing the nuclear warhead, or producing the explosive nuclear material for the warhead — the design of US nuclear warheads is done by government labs, e.g. Los Alamos and Livermore (in the past, both were administered for the government by the University of California, I’m not sure if that is still the case today) — the explosive nuclear material for the warheads also comes from government facilities.

It appears Zalman Shapiro, the founder of NUMEC, was involved in constructing reactor cores, including fuel assemblies, for US nuclear submarines when he worked at Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory, a government facility — this may explain the need for NUMEC to have access to HEU, i.e. if NUMEC produced fuel cores for naval reactors — but I am still not sure if NUMEC had the capability, or the legal authority, to enrich uranium itself — I’ve only seen that HEU was ‘leased’ to NUMEC by the AEC, a government agency — the HEU ‘leased’ to NUMEC by the AEC probably came from Oak Ridge, another government lab where uranium was enriched by gaseous diffusion.

Private companies do design nuclear reactors, but a normal reactor, e.g. a commercial reactor for producing electricity, does not use HEU as fuel — the NRC closely regulates the fuel cycle for commercial nuclear reactors, since spent fuel contains dangerous radionuclides, and is a potential source of plutonium, a fissile material.

Actually, regarding the JFK assassination, for the benefit of idiots people like you, I’ll state my position on that as clearly as I can:

I don’t know if Israel was involved in the assassination of JFK or not — maybe they were, maybe they weren’t — personally, I do not regard any of the (alleged) evidence for that, e.g. as presented here by Unz in his writing, as convincing — I also have not read any more substantial works on the subject, e.g. Final Judgment by Piper (but I assume Unz has presented the most salient parts of that book).

This should have been obvious from what I said before — apparently it wasn’t.

A general comment about JFK: it’s a lot easier to discredit the Warren Report and its conclusion, than to identify exactly who was behind it, if not Oswald — all speculation about that relies heavily on circumstantial evidence, and again for me personally, a lot of that speculation goes too far, to the point some of the conclusions are just not supported well enough by the (largely circumstantial) evidence.

And I have no idea what you mean here by ‘also’ — I don’t know if HEU was transferred to Israel via NUMEC or not — maybe it was, maybe it wasn’t — I said this was ‘somewhat controversial’ because you can find credible people who advance one or the other position (e.g. Seymour Hersh doesn’t believe HEU from NUMEC went to Israel, neither did Glenn Seaborg, chairman of the AEC) — I have not reviewed all of the evidence, so I make no conclusion — if you follow the link I gave to the ‘definitive’ article, you’ll see it references dozens of reports and documents, but the author says ‘important unknowns remain’ — when/if I have time, I will review some of those reports and documents, as well as read other summary articles, to see what conclusions the bulk of the evidence supports.

The point being, I could have cared less about the assassination.

The point being, your vote counts less because you are so late to the party. There’s far too much of that hereabouts.

The assassination was boring? Suck it up, Chalmers.

Is it still a Zionist coup if LBJ was in on it?

Is it still a Zionist coup if Mafiosi were involved?

Is it still a Zionist coup if CIA were involved?

See the whole board. It sounds like you don’t understand confluence of interests.

Another poster’s “If I decided to look into JFK assassination a few years ago, I would have just read Bill O’Reilly’s book and called it a day” is equally troublingly amusing. That’s the one book not to bother reading.

The point being, I could have cared less about the assassination. Oswald-lone-shooter is basically the main point of the O’Reilly book. Even if “the CIA”, organized crime, or some other domestic element orchestrated the assassination, its just a self-inflicted wound (America on America crime). The assassination would still be boring if that were the case. The CIA underwent reforms in the 1970s, Angleton was fired, organized crime basically deteriorated. The MIC is something we could reform internally.

The only real eye-opener of a theory, and the one with the most significant implications, is the Israeli theory outlined in Final Judgment. It basically suggests that the JFK Assassination was a Zionist coup, which it was, precipitated by the Israeli nuclear weapons issue.

Mr. Unz! For the love of God Montresor! A little leeway here?

why would a private company be allowed to produce weapons grade U235?

See? Again there’s that problem with your thinker. Who do you think builds our weapons, the Tooth Fairy?

I believe you also don’t think Israel was involved the assassination of JFK at all, if I remember correctly.

>where does plutonium come from?

Normally from processing spent nuclear reactor fuel — but you don’t need highly enriched uranium (HEU) to fuel a reactor — also, a breeder reactor can generate plutonium from U238 using only lightly enriched uranium as reactor fuel — spent fuel processing to recover plutonium is a fairly sophisticated process.

Stealing U235 to make a bomb is conceivable if the need for the bomb was deemed acute, i.e. it would have taken significantly longer for Israel to either enrich uranium to weapons grade themselves, to generate plutonium via the fuel cycle of a conventional reactor, or construct a breeder reactor to generate plutonium from U238 (both of the latter options require fairly sophisticated processing).

It’s difficult to find exact info on NUMEC (Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation) — what was its business? — HEU for a bomb, known as weapons grade (typically 85% U235), is a strictly controlled material — why would a private company be allowed to produce weapons grade U235?

I’ve seen reports the US government stopped producing HEU in 1964 — but HEU, typically weapons grade and above, is used by the US Navy in its nuclear propulsion reactors — who produces the fuel for the navy’s reactors?

The NUMEC Affair: Did Highly Enriched Uranium from the U.S. Aid Israel’s Nuclear Weapons Program?

The above article is generally considered a definitive account — it says NUMEC was ‘founded to invent new and improved methods of processing nuclear fuel’, it ‘began manufacturing fuel for nuclear reactors in 1959’, and it ‘processed many tons of uranium in its lifetime, reaching a peak annual throughput of more than 700 metric tons in 1973’ — only lightly enriched uranium is needed as fuel for a normal reactor — what kind of ‘processing’ of Uranium did it do?.

The article also says the AEC ‘leased’ HEU to NUMEC — why? — what did NUMEC do with it? — what was the grade of the ‘leased’ HEU, how enriched was it? — does the ‘leasing’ mean NUMEC did not produce, or was not allowed to produce, HEU?

The claim HEU from NUMEC went to Israel is still controversial.

Agreed. FYI —my replies to you and others are very rare because Unz has limited my ability to post to 3 post per day. And I cannot click the Agree/Disagree/ETC button –it does not work under my restricted account. I appreciate your comments and support. I am sad that I will not be able to go to war with certain individuals up here on Unz this coming 9/11 Anniversary —Apparently Free Speech has its limits.

So Israel really didn’t have to steal uranium.

You have a problem with your thinker. Tell me, misfit Padewan, where does plutonium come from?

Another poster’s “If I decided to look into JFK assassination a few years ago, I would have just read Bill O’Reilly’s book and called it a day” is equally troublingly amusing. That’s the one book not to bother reading.

So Israel really didn’t have to steal uranium.

If some stupid goy left it on the back of a truck, why not take it???

You’re forgetting the subject matter here and THEIR mentality. Don’t use your own motivational template when examining the motive of the joooooos.

1) more for them and less for the goyim is “good for the joooos”

2) you don’t truly ‘dominate’ (parasite) a host culture until you can steal from will from it

3) there may have been some personal profit involved here

4) what’s better than one kind of nuclear option? Two kinds!

I mean honestly, Israel is probably taking a lot more than we ever hear about. Not just nuclear stuff either.

The scene of the crime was the Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation, or NUMEC, a uranium processing facility in Apollo, Pennsylvania owned by a Zionist financier named David Lowenthal. In 1965, Zalman Shapiro, a fellow Zionist hired by Lowenthal to run the plant, illegally diverted hundreds of kilograms of nuclear fissile material to Israel.

It takes 35 to 55 lbs of highly enriched U235 (containing at least 80% U235) to make a gun-type A bomb depending on the explosive power needed. If Israel stole 200+ kilograms from the Apollo, PA factory and assuming that the U-235 was very highly enriched and not requiring further enrichment by banks of centrifuges then Israel could have made at the most about 12 bombs.

Israel reportedly has at least 200 A bombs of all types. Most of Israel’s bombs are of the plutonium type. This plutonium comes from their Dimona reactor. It was (((John Von Neumann))) who developed the crucial mathematical framework and the explosive lens design for the implosion type mechanism used to detonate plutonium bombs.

So Israel really didn’t have to steal uranium.

It’s also best to review the Photo Section of Final Judgment when looking to refresh your memory on some of the specifics: https://www.unz.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Final_Judgment_Photo-Section.pdf

And I like the Walter Cronkite story Piper tells; yes it appears Walter Cronkite, the most famous TV newsman in American history, endorsed the general theory in Final Judgment:

“Earlier, on Aug. 31, 1996, Ray Kalainikas, a reader of Final Judgment, encountered famed CBS broadcaster Walter Cronkite at the farmer’s market in West Tisbury on Martha’s Vineyard. Kalainikas outlined the thesis of Final Judgment to Cronkite, who listened intently. Then, looking out to sea, Cronkite remarked succinctly: I can’t think of any group with the exception of Israeli intelligence that would have been able to keep the JFK assassination conspiracy under wraps for so long.”

Could be true…I certainly would never have thought the Piper hypothesis was possible even 3-4 years ago. If I decided to look into JFK assassination a few years ago, I would have just read Bill O’Reilly’s book and called it a day.

Plus, I think Piper’s book has spread like wildfire in the last few years, in part due to your highlighting it and also making it available for free on your site. I’m not sure I know of anyone with reach comparable to yours who has highlighted it or endorsed FJ, until very recently…e.g. in March 2025, Roger Stone says he read it, but I’m skeptical of him in general.

Up until maybe 1-2 years ago, I think Final Judgment was only available for $200+ on Amazon (other than this site). So I guess its very possible even mainstream JFK researchers would have been unaware of it. Final Judgment is now in paperback on Amazon for a reasonable price, which I think is very recent (not certain).

I had never heard of Piper or The Spotlight until I came across your articles on JFK. I was reading the Weekly Standard up until it went defunct in 2018; people’s opinions can change quite dramatically as they discover new information, as mine did.

Here is a decent video from Ken McCarthy…had never heard of this guy before a few days ago when someone reposted his book on JFK/RFK’s war against Zionism, but Ken McCarthy names James Angleton as the central person most responsible for the assassination of JFK. Not a big shocker, but interesting coming from McCarthy.

Video Link

Mr. Unz might be interested in Mark Elsis’s work:

https://earthnewspaper.com/mark-r-elsis/israel-assassinated-president-john-f-kennedy-by-mark-r-elsis/

Probably dozens of JFK Assassination authors, and probably a couple of hundred researchers, post and congregate at the JFK Education Forum, linked below. John Newman doesn’t post much there but friends and collaborators of his (Alan Dale) do, DiEugenio posts there, Larry Hancock posts there, Bill Kelly who runs a JFK blog posts there, there’s maybe a couple of dozen other names I could note that either have books or blogs to their name. Quite a few of them write for the same site Bleu does.

The forum thread there on Piper’s FINAL JUDGMENT was started in 2006, and it ran for ten years, covering 32 pages of posts. Piper himself posted on it while he was alive. The opening pages were heavily dismissive, calling Piper an anti-semite. On the final page, someone is having a look at Angleton again. A few of the posters there are still regulars and I have seen them increasingly discuss Israel in their postings over the last year or two.

I would describe Piper and his book as being quite well known among those authors, but I suspect only through its negative reputation, and it was only when some brave souls decided to do the unthinkable and read it, and research some of its findings, that the light bulb started to go on.

https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/6056-michael-collins-piper-final-judgement/

Very interesting. Obviously if that person is genuine, its a good thing. But I might be wary of someone like that coming out of nowhere. Piper talked about how he got lured by people pretending to be his friend and who would want to talk to him about “Final Judgement”. He said most of the time he suspected it was a setup and sometimes he verified it was. People trying to get him to “mellow out” on the assassination. I think one time he said a person came to him asking about maybe buying the rights to his book or suggesting a movie etc and it turned out to be something nefarious.

I would think that since Final Judgment was published, probably 90% of JFK researchers have heard of it, and among those who wrote more than 1 book, it was probably 100% had heard of FJ.

Although, it was probably your own work that made the person you are talking about become interested in these ideas. And people change their minds, so it could be a very good thing of course.

To stick with the facts, Sidney Gottlieb spent some of his undergraduate years in the Young People’s Socialist League which was the official youth branch of the Socialist Party of America. Gottlieb was never a part of the Communist Party. Those are the facts.

Yes, really. Why would I lie to you, Rob? If you think about it, you answered your own question (about currency) in your initial response to my reply to the article. Remember? Go back and have a look. I have an idea what you’re getting at, but things are not always “cut and dried”; much easier said than done. An observation: you’re all over the place in this particular, rather lengthy comment section. I don’t know, but maybe you should rest awhile, take a breather, harness your stream of consciousness.

Thank you for the correction regarding his religion, but in turn i will correct you regarding his race, which was only half Irish (from his mother’s side).

> Clinton’s AIPAC handlers shut down the Venona decoding.

False.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venona_project

—–
The Venona project was a United States counterintelligence program initiated during World War II by the United States Army’s Signal Intelligence Service and later absorbed by the National Security Agency (NSA), that ran from February 1, 1943, until October 1, 1980.
—–

Clinton took office in 1993.

Those are called ” $64000 Questions”.

Really? Why?

Is it because you don’t have the required currency?

“Jewish” as biological is problematic. One needs but consider that there are Chinese Jews, Kush (Black) Jews & Scandinavian Jews. The Khazars, Turkmen converts, were not of Levant origin, but spread & interbred with the ethnicities of Europa. While they claim Jewishness from the maternal line, Biblically it was patriarchal. There used to be some patriarchal list which is said to have been destroyed in like 150 AD. It seems, in a way, they are more ideological cultish. Rather like the Thugees who inbred in their closed societies. Moreover, per the Ringworm children, the Ashkenazi vastly discriminate vs. the Sephardic & the Kush. They are a conundrum. This Prof.’s report is enlightening.

Rabbi, Prof. of Hebrew Says Moses, Abraham Not “Jews” Which Started in the Persian Era Talmud, i.e. the Pharisees Doctrine, not Original Ancient Worship. Breeding w/pagans noted too.
https://odysee.com/@LeelooDallas:d/Rabbi-Admits-Judaism-Is-Not-In-The-Bible-Nor-Was-Moses-A-Jew-The-Sons-Of-Israel-Are-Not-Jewish:7

Israel did not kill the Kennedy’s. Jews did. Israel does not do anything. Jews do all kinds of horrible things. Israel is not controlling Western politicians jews are.

Its time to stop allowing jews to hide behind their Zionist and Israel smokescreens.

Communism is the Jewish Utopia, check it out. Try not denying reality of the CIA being overtaken by such.

Those are called ” $64000 Questions”.

The first creep that I saw declaring pictures of and reports concerning children slaughtered in Gaza by the Zionazis to be a ‘blood libel’, was the ultra-odious Howard Jacobson, in the fecking ‘Guardian (of Israel)’.

It will be a great day when Americans stop “turning the other cheek”.

What “Americans” will have the courage to do that?

What will it take for that to happen?

I agree. We need and have a right to know what’s being done to us and by whom. It will be a great day when Americans stop “turning the other cheek”.

William Colby was not a WASP, but an Irish Catholic who was more than likely murdered by the Mossad. His“drowning” while canoeing is BS.

“ Colby was for his entire life a staunch Catholic.[4] He was often referred to as “the warrior–priest.” The Catholic Church played a “central role” in his family’s life, with Colby’s two daughters receiving their First Communion at St. Peter’s Basilica.[5]”. Wikipedia

Perhaps more pertinent, Gottlieb was never a Communist in any capacity.

Listen to this cock sucker;

Netanyahu calls for censorship:

“Israel is accused of starving children, pretty much the way that in the Middle Ages Jews were accused of killing Christian children for their blood.”

We “have to do something about the algorithms at the social networks,” he says.

LBJ on 12/2/1963:

Katherine Graham: Hello Mr. President.

LBJ: Hello My Sweetheart how’re you?

Katherine Graham: Well I’m fine are you.

LBJ: You know the only one thing I dislike about this job is that I’m married and I can’t ever get to see you. I just hear that sweet voice that’s always on the telephone. And I’d like to break outta here and be like one of these young animals down on my ranch and jump the fence!

Katherine Graham: Hahahahaha.

ALL JEW$ WORLDWIDE will have to be held responsible for the ongoing marginalization and murder of Palestinians.
There is no other way. Pressure must be put on the “good” jews as well.
Question for the “good” jews…
Where were you when the Nakba and continuing dispossession and outright murder and starvation of the Palestinians over many decades was and is taking place?
…(crickets)…
The only reason (some) jews are finally speaking out, protesting the present genocides going on is out of purely self-interest, not because they have any empathy for the Palestinians (and the rest of us).
They see “the handwriting on the wall” and are being recognized as being demonic beings by just about all decent people worldwide.
Expulsion from country 110 (occupied Palestine) is on the horizon.
You see, jews are amoral to a fault, especially when it comes to us gentiles.
I can count truly “good” jews on one hand…Norman Finkelstein, Ron Unz, John Mearsheimer and Gilad Atzmon (who himself repudiated and abandoned the whole jewish system). I have great respect for jews who speak out, but there aren’t enough “good” jews to make a difference. Change will have to come from without.
It is jewish mental illness that is a major problem in the world today.
Jews are taught from birth that they are “victims” who are hated for “just being jews (yeah, right)” while at the same time are supremacists whose duty is to “improve the world” (tikkun olam) making the world a better place, but only for jews.
I have analyzed judaism at length and have come to the conclusion that such a vile, demonic system has no place in the modern world.
Every jewish “holy day” is a celebration of conquest, genocide, and total destruction of the jews’ enemies. We are seeing that jewish “celebration” (genocide) taking place in Gaza and the West Bank as we speak.
Know israel (and jews) no peace…
No israel (and jews) know peace…
Jews worldwide (yes, this includes the very few “good” jews) are going to have to be held responsible for the genocides and government takeovers (coups) in the world.
Shunning is but one non-violent method that we can all utilize to let them know where we stand. Refusal to do business with them is but another method that can be used.
Both methods are effective.

Roger Stone is another. He said in late 2024 that all Israel-critical members of the MAGA movement should be purged… But I just don’t trust the guy.

“I’m hardcore Zionist, so is president Trump.” – Roger Stone

I can’t understand much of this.
Need a transcript.

The Pierre Neuville revelations are the smoking gun/new testimony that Piper broke in his book. Precisely zero of the “JFK Conspiracy Establishment” writers have ever mentioned Neuville’s name, so far as I can tell.

They also never seem to talk about Gary Wean or John Tower’s story, who really help put lots of puzzle pieces together.

Morley and his crowd never seem willing to get to the bottom of these things. They are content to continue making big money keeping the mystery alive, in my humble opinion.

Or they enjoy the prestige that comes with “slow-walking” or the truth. Jefferson Morley and James DiEugenio and Oliver Stone know that the minute they implicate Israel, their movie contracts, mainstream book deals, and their liason work with Congress will likely be over.

Roger Stone is another. He said in late 2024 that all Israel-critical members of the MAGA movement should be purged. Then a few months later in March 2025 he says “hey, I decided to read Final Judgment!” But he’s been totally mute on the issue since then. Then again, I do understand that these people, including Roger Stone, are under a microscope. But I just don’t trust the guy.

When Richard Nixon called LBJ an “animal”, I think he was correct. Here’s a bit of proof. I guess this type of talk was normal back then. Funny nonetheless:

Video Link

The same dynamic is at play now. Your greedy and nihilistic Christian libertarianism is what empowered King Bibi to win in November.

America’s womanly fear of Communism empowered her conquest. Same as always.

The cows over at ZeroHedge are being milked with the same technology.

become aware their lives are at risk. Suddenly they wake up.

Those of us here have gathered in this community because we have woken up. We know the wave is coming.

We have a responsibility to act upon the knowledge we possess just like you’re hoping the rest of the world will when they also “wake up”.

We can develop a plan to defeat ZOG here on this town square, transparently and legally, which can be shared and acted upon wherever town squares like this enjoy free speech..

But nobody here wants to act on this knowledge. They’re only interested in talking about it hoping that someone else will act. That’s not how saving yourself and others works.

Say you’ll participate in developing a plan to defeat ZOG here and now.

Apparently the Germans in Berlin are more courageous and enlightened than we here in the USA.

When the worst terrorist organization on Earth, called “Israel,” murders helpless women and children, rapes them, sodomizes and kills unarmed Palestinian men, starves and burns babies alive in front of their parents, and incarcerates thousands of innocent Palestinians without charges – when this organization continues to blackmail other nations (using the “antisemitism” trick) in order to be armed and financed by US-led Western regimes, you know something is wrong in the world and humanity is at a crossroads.

I also posted this information here on 8/3:

https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-jeffrey-epstein-the-franklin-scandal-pedophilia-and-political-blackmail/#comment-7246002

Speaking of the JFK Assassination, you should read my comment about a newly un-redacted document that I first identified and posted here on this site, see my comment: https://www.unz.com/runz/marked-for-death-by-a-reckless-america/?showcomments#comment-7250002

Laurent Guyenot reposted a brief post on his Substack “Radbod’s Lament” about these documents: https://substack.com/home/post/p-170064899

There is not a single mention of this new information from Jefferson Morley or his crew.

I reviewed these documents with a retired engineer who worked on naval missile launchers, and he agreed this document from 11/20/1963 references the Israeli Jericho missiles. In other words, 2 days before Kennedy was killed, McCone’s intelligence gathering operation against Israeli’s nuclear activities determined that Israel has ordered missiles from France that could only be for carrying a nuclear warhead. We know in retrospect that that is exactly what those missiles were for.

We never knew that JFK had gotten wind of these nuclear warhead missiles this early…I’m 90% sure that most of our standard sources say that the first official US awareness of these missiles was in the late 1960s, not Nov 1963.

There’s some extremely interesting and new information in these JFK docs if you look hard enough.

It is painful to watch. 🙁

Re “I forget, What happened to Colby? Oh yeah right, he went on that impulsive dinnertime canoe jaunt and had a freak accident, a waterspout whirled it around and sucked him up to spy heaven with Frank Olsen and John O’Neill ( https://richardgage911.substack.com/p/who-killed-john-oneil )”

And don’t forget what happened to Mary Pinchot Meyer, and Angleton’s weird, illegal, obviously spookish actions to break into her apartment hours after her death to get ahold of her diary and disappear it. Angelton was in the apartment when Meyer’s (I think) sister and brother-in-law arrived there. CREEEEEPY!!!

He probably had set spies on JFK and Meyer.

Angleton definitely had a role in JFK’s death and he was acting with the Zionists.

All of them nauseating creeeeeeps.

Yours is not a popular attitude, but it is the only truly viable one, unfortunately. Like you, I have no illusions of mounting the barricades and storming the temples of power or whatever other daydreams occupy the minds of some of our more quixotic commentators.

However, I truly believe it would make no ultimate difference whether the essential and longstanding baseness of our government were finally to be revealed in toto. Remember the Panama Papers? Remember the Pentagon Papers? Remember when Wikileaks revealed that the US was pervasively surveilling its allies, right up to their heads of state? And these are but a few headlines once thought to be earth-shattering.

Nevertheless, I do not believe the dissemination of this kind of information to be totally in vain. At the very least, I find it edifying in a way. A certain satisfaction can be had from understanding the nature of a cancer killing one from within.

It is clear pentagon did 911

Read book by kevin ryan

Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects

And

Cory hughes a warning from history

Clinton was reckless to stick his cock in that mouth.

newly elected people to whatever level of government are treated to an all inclusive trip to occupied Palestine where they are wined, dined and videoed with an underage male or female prostitute. From then on they are owned by the zionists.

Baby Trudeau squared his shoulders and went to occupied Palestine ostensibly to sort those buggers out, he came back a cowed little boy and never ever uttered a word against the zionist occupiers.

Losers , every last one of them! Most dead and buried and soon to be forgotten. For those who have a poetic turn of mind read Ozymandias by Percy Shelley.

I met a traveller from an antique land
Who said: Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desert. Near them, on the sand,
Half sunk, a shattered visage lies, whose frown,
And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command,
Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
The hand that mocked them and the heart that fed:
And on the pedestal these words appear:
“My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings:
Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!
No thing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare
The lone and level sands stretch far away.

These megalomaniacal psychopaths are not satisfied with the Earth; they consider themselves the “masters of the universe” [sic], while simultaneously prohibiting any claims that they rule the world.

https://twitter.com/Kahlissee/status/1917952657085305000
https://twitter.com/MaxBlumenthal/status/1916717323194339487