The Zionist goal is to replace the local police with a national one accountable only to the elite.

Exactly. Their #Jews@EVERYbottlENECK technique necessitates that (((they))) minimize the number of control/choke points so their tribe can cover them all.

As commented yesterday on Eric Striker’s typical insightful article

https://www.unz.com/estriker/trove-of-leaked-fbi-fusion-center-and-dhs-documents-provide-insight-into-antifa-charlottesville-political-bias-and-the-erosion-of-civil-liberties/

Local police are doing good work:

Law enforcement is fully aware of who provokes the fighting and rioting at riots: the left. The documents from fusion centers across the country (intelligence provided by local police departments) repeatedly report this.

But

Both the FBI and to a lesser extent the Department of Homeland Security are far more concerned with political ideology and creating propaganda than upholding the law.

So the bottom line is:

The most disturbing aspect of all this is how groups like the Anti-Defamation League appear to have more sway over the FBI’s investigative priorities than intelligence provided to them by local fusion centers.

It appears that in defense of their power, our elites are willing to do away with all liberal pretenses and take on “emergency orders” that ultimately punishes peaceful dissent while allowing real criminals to go free.

The negroes having been sold by their own race into the Jew dominated Atlantic slave trade have a long history with the Jews. Having imitated white culture with role models such was B.T. Washington and G.W. Carver they had a promising future in America. Now that so many of them have bought into victim and discrimination mentality started by Zionist Jew banker Jacob Schiff that progress for many has been halted and instead they have become proxy warriors for the Kikes. This process was supercharged with the Jew run civil rights scam to get more government control and install the hate laws, antisemite laws and general anti white culture of today reinforced by the recent artery, Bronna Taylor and fake Floyd gov. psyops. The Zionist goal is to replace the local police with a national one accountable only to the elite.

The racial division is just one area of Zioinist Jew activity. They have instigated the world wars and now drive the phony “War On Terror” as a cover for the Yinnon Plan for Greater Israel and the continued destruction of the Middle East. We are now experiencing a medical fraud that been planned for years and has had several precursors including the fake AIDS epidemic. Great cover for another round of theft by the Jews Central bank for their Wall St. buddies as in the 08 bailouts for the super rich.

Last of all most of our government has been infiltrated by this criminal conspiracy. The Presidency has been controlled since the syphilitic puppet actor Wilson over 100 years ago and now most of the Governors pander to the Kazar thugs in Israel. Not one Senator will vote against aIPAC and very few House members.

It is a sad commentary that our once unique bastion of individual liberty, this Republic of Sovereign States has degenerated into a European style socialist regime on the way to becoming a failed 3rd world country. A “democracy” run by the Zionist Jews.

…Obama’s real father Frank M. Davis…

Knowledge of this truthful fact now significant in US history is, sadly, a rare credential.

Everything else you say here is profoundly accurate to the point the black man should recognize it’s time he throw off the exploitative Jew manipulators of his people.

Hoax crimes amongst blacks are as common as hate hoax crimes amongst Jews. In recent memory Al Sharpton’s hoax with Tawana Brawley all the way to the jogger/burglar in Georgia. The Jews create hoaxes to garner sympathy and leverage. The Blacks learned from them to do the same.

There are two major issues that have never been realistically discussed due to a journalistic “softness and affinity” for communism.

One, is the “re-education programs” (actually prison sentences) for those who supported the South or who worked for Americans. Despite claims to the contrary, most “re-education camp” prison sentences were as long as twenty years, not the six-months that the communists claimed.

Another (and more shameful) situation is the treatment of gravesites and cemeteries for those who fought for the South. To this day, the communist government prohibits the upkeep or even recognition of those who fought honorably for the South.

Relatives of those who are interred in these cemeteries are prohibited from honoring their dead relatives per communist government edict.

Just recently, here in the United States there was a ceremony for an elite ARVN unit whose members perished.

Under communist Vietnamese government edicts they cannot be interred in their ancestral homeland just because of communist intransigence. They have been interred in a public memorial in “little Saigon” in California.

Yes, there were a lot of bad decisions made and committed with the Vietnam war, but one can hope, that because of our sacrifices, communism could not be imposed with the same zeal that it was imposed on the North.

“Vietnam war changed all that when the government blamed the media for losing the war.”

Since we are off the reservation of the article – something that has nothing to do with my or my comments. The very second the first official anyone blamed the US for the war in Vietnam . . . truth, already on the defense took a serious hit.

The evidence says the communist started the war and lost the war but there are very few journalists who are willing to debunk the myths about that conflict and the role of the US in it.

And when the North Vietnamese commenced to slaughtering their fellows in their “give peace a chance” moment — those same journalists, instructors, politicians, protesters were stunningly silent. I agree that era is very important to who and what the country is today —- but on that issue truth of a mountain unable to be seen for the fog of liberal nonsense.

Peace loving North Vietnamese — good grief

Walter Cronkite was a scumbag communist who HATED the USA.

His declaration that “the (Vietnam) war was lost” was an outright LIE.

After the TET offensive in 1968, the communists had to rely on North Vietnamese regulars, as the Viet Cong had been wiped out.

In fact, the North was ready to “deal” in 1968 until cronkite and the American “mainstream media” “snatched defeat from the jaws of victory”.

The mainstream media has been run by the CIA since the mid 1950s. “Stories” are carefuly “planted” to acheive the desired result…

It used to be pretty good in the U.S. as far as trust in the media when Walter Cronkite would tell you something. Vietnam war changed all that when the government blamed the media for losing the war.

correction:

And as I recall this article was not about either. The misdirection if that is what you mean by

“stay on the subject”

the veer off the reservation of the issue doesn’t have a dog’s hair or breath to do with me.

“You are using your jewish trait of “misdirection”.
I mention the talmud and you mention the torah.

Stay on subject, pal…

WE are on to you…”

Oy veh and I have no idea what the whippers snappers are you on about. Laugh.

One cannot discuss the talmud with referencing the Torah and the old testament.

And as I recall this article was not about either. The misdirection if that what you mean by off the reservation of the issues doesn’t have a dog’s hair or breath to do with me.

You are using your jewish trait of “misdirection”.
I mention the talmud and you mention the torah.

Stay on subject, pal…

WE are on to you…

“The Ten Commandments proscribe certain behavior, but the rest of mosaic law relies on a vindictive, vengeful “god” to exact “punishment” on “his people”. That my work fine for jews, as they have their evil “talmud” to rely on, but “for the rest of us, it won’t wash.”

Laugh.

I am not going to go further astray by a discussion on the merits of the torah and its relationship to christian ethos or belief. And I am going to avoid the jew bashing consequence of the same by diving into a debate about the validity of the talmud.

Suffice it to say that the links between christian faith and the torah are very well grounded. Whether and how one chooses to wrestle with the torah, the talmud or the Qu’ran in relation to self and or christianity is matter for — self. I generally tend to lean on scripture in as proper a context as possible.

——————————

The issues in the US are by and large the consequence of the US leadership and its citizens. Our poor choices cannot be blamed on Israel, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Russia, China . . . and while there are grounds to take issue with other countries — the current state of US domestic and foreign policy is the consequence of US decision making.

An excellent summation.

The Ten Commandments proscribe certain behavior, but the rest of mosaic law relies on a vindictive, vengeful “god” to exact “punishment” on “his people”. That my work fine for jews, as they have their evil “talmud” to rely on, but “for the rest of us, it won’t wash.

“I am a Christian, and I have never wound up at religious cross purposes with any of the Jews I have as friends or co-workers. We share the Old Testament, 10 Commandments, and Judeo-Christian values.”

Wrong. Christians come under the New Covenant!

The Old Testament is only included in the collection of “books” called “The Bible” to substantiate or lay the groundwork for the coming of John The Baptizer and Jesus the Prophet , who some call Christ.

Your personal bias gets in the way of any ability of being objective, i.e. your posts here are entirely subjective – so there is no reason for any contributors to this site to take you seriously.

“I am a Christian, and I have never wound up at religious cross purposes with any of the Jews I have as friends or co-workers. We share the Old Testament, 10 Commandments, and Judeo-Christian values.”

This has nothing to do with what I stated. This conversation is about whether Jews see Jesus as some kindof hometown boy done good as you press. I think there may be Jews who think as much. However, by and large a Jew who has not coverted must by definition reject the risen christ. Otherwise they would acknowledge him as something more than just a local boy makes good. They are still waiting for the messiah – which by definition means that anyone claiming to be the messiah must be in error by way of: heretic, or off his proverbial rocker.

The believer on Christ shares a common heritage with the Jews by way of the historical , ethical and spiritual lineage – but that is also the case made by Muslims who embrace a ood del of the old and new testament —-

However, neither faith embraces the Christ and any claims that Christ has to human salvation, decendent from and with God — as in I am that I am as Christ does in the Gospel of John when he says

“Before Abraham was — I am” a comment that sends the jews over the edge because Jesus equated himself in manner as God — and the jews were not having it.

——————–

Now to relations with Muslims and Jews – I likewise have had some great relations with both. And that is as it should be in my view. I think it;s great ta people of varying degrees of faith and practice have common sharing. And as long as jews or Muslims aren’t attempting to destroy my life they may believe as they will.

I don’t have much if response to your tend to overgeneralize people to fit tour conclusion. But your reference to Allah as Satan must be juxtaposed to Christ’s accusation regarding jewish leadership as children of Satan. I think you will find that if you forgo your assumptions and incendiary language you will find that there is common ground for relations with Muslims as well —

In my iew you are substituting a political affinity or lack thereof for something spiritual. They are not the same thing.

————————————–

““I am a Christian, and I have never wound up at religious cross purposes with any of the Jews I have as friends or co-workers.”

Then maybe you’re not aware of what it is christians and jews embrace — because spiritually there are definitive cross purposes.

You are a curious fellow. I am sure there may be Jews who think as you do.

I am a Christian, and I have never wound up at religious cross purposes with any of the Jews I have as friends or co-workers. We share the Old Testament, 10 Commandments, and Judeo-Christian values.

Ultimately, we have the same God even though the form of worship varies.

I think you need to spend more time speaking with them on their iews regarding christ.

— Jihad requires all Muslims to kill Christians in the name of Satan/Allah.
— Taqiyya requires all Muslims to lie to Christians about their murder of Christians for Allah/Satan.

I am not sure I see any upside to talking with proven liars under Satanic orders to kill my children and defile God. The only way it could be value-added is convincing Muslims to abandon their devotion to Allah/Satan and the Anti-Christ Muhammad. However, given the inherent violent Blood Lust of Jihadi Islam, it is rather too risky.

PEACE 😷

“ But how the hell did he miss this?! ”

The filmmaker never says the defense team missed this. Legal tactics is an mysterious world. I don’t presume to understand it.

Having said that, the filmmaker noted that the prosecution dumped this evidence on the defense team at the last minute and I believe the judge denied an extension.

“Jews think of Jesus as the local boy who has done well. Not to be worshipped as Son of God, but they bear no animus towards Jesus.”

You are a curious fellow. I am sure there may be Jews who think as you do. But if one leans of scripture, the jewish opposition, especially among the leadership was not an open secret — it was open opposition. they took some care because Jess was popular, but make no mistake they sought to curb him or do away with him. And in the end, — the Jewish population abandoned him.

That in no manner is cause to engage in war against the Jews, afterall the gentiles gave them what they wanted. But there;s no reason to sugar coat the or contradict the record.

As for your comments about muslims, I think you need to spend more time speaking with them on their iews regarding christ. You are on extremes not reflected in reality as held by most Muslims, in my view.

Not how I eel, or how I think, bu as noted in the record.
https://www.soundvision.com/article/10-points-christians-should-know-about-muslims-and-jesus

i stand here I came in

Non-converted Jews think Christ was a heretic: a liar, a usurper, a con man, misguided and or out of his mind and they reject him in full as much — in fact to remain a faithful faith and practicing Jew — by definition one has to reject the Christ

Jews think of Jesus as the local boy who has done well. Not to be worshipped as Son of God, but they bear no animus towards Jesus.

Muslims routinely spread Taqiyya lies about Jewish attitudes toward Jesus in order to manufacture conflict between infidel enemies.

Muslims think that the Christ was not the Christ either, but rather a enlightened prophet, who testimony and wisdom he shared freely, he … he was a kindred spirit of Mohammed as brother prophet

Ludicrous.

The purpose of the Anti-Christ Muhammad’s time on Earth was to oppose Christ in all things and defile the memory of Jesus. Muhammad’s Jihad called for the murder, rape, and/or forced conversion of all those who followed Son of God.

The Demon Issa mentioned in the Satanic Verses of the Quran has nothing to do with Jesus, the Son of God. Again, Taqiyya requires this intentional mis-translation by the Blood Cultist Followers of Allah/Satan.

PEACE 😷

Laughing.

I guess closing the door and or changing the subject is a good way to run from losing arguments.

———————————-

In the matter of Christ — by whom all men must be saved. Based on what available scripture we have — despite my respect for people of some faith — neither Jews nor Muslims can make any unique claim o Christ as a spiritual embrace.

Short versions;

Non-converted Jews think Christ was a heretic: a liar, a usurper, a con man, misguided and or out of his mind and they reject him in full as much — in fact to remain a faithful faith and practicing Jew — by definition one has to reject the Christ

Muslims think that the Christ was not the Christ either, but rather a enlightened prophet, who testimony and wisdom he shared freely, he might have been the son of God, but he was not the Son of God descended directly from the father, nor did he rise from the grave, but that he was a kindred spirit of Mohammed as brother prophet and all of this resurrection stuff was a cooked up story by his followers and claims of savior are heretical

Oddly enough both Jews and Muslims both think the resurrection a cooked up tale by his followers and is a lie. Trying to decipher whether Muslims or Jews is better follower of Jesus is like tying to decide whether one should poke themselves in the right eye or the left. Whichever causes offence — and both cause offense,

for the followers of Christ neither Jews or Muslims hold superior position. And the Apostles, followers of Christ all jews prior to salvation make that case — it is entirely incorrect to iew the care for jews that a christian may experience is a substitute for a higher rung 0n the ladder of christian faith.

Notice that this delusion ignores any human agency. Do people not have free will to make up their own minds as to the actions they take? Of course they do!

This is correct. However, it is disconnected from everything else you say.

Judas, follower of Allah/Satan, had free will. He chose poorly.
_____

There are a couple of special cases:

— Jesus, the Son of God
— Muhammad, the Son of Allah/Satan

Clearly, Jesus had free will and chose to sacrifice for God and Man. Muhammad had free will and chose to rape 9 year old Aisha as a Testament to Evil.

You can see how they are both spiritual beacons of their father’s doctrines.

PEACE 😷

Hi Pop, you may like to read my reply below.

Your Lord Satan, enemy of Jews and Christians, directed the execution the Son of God

Notice that this delusion ignores any human agency. Do people not have free will to make up their own minds as to the actions they take? Of course they do!

The fact of the matter is, incited by the religious authorities of His day (the Pharisees and Sadducees), Jewish people chanted:

‘Let the blood of this man be on our children, and on our children’s children!’
‘Let the blood of this man be on our children, and on our children’s children!’
‘Let the blood of this man be on our children, and on our children’s children!’

This of course explains why:
1. they’ve been persecuted down through the ages – being expelled from 109 regions and countries; and
2. the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE – and we know that you full well know the symbolism of that!

And what makes you think that Jesus the Prophet, who some call Christ, is the only prophet killed by the Jews?

And why do you think that the Book of Revelation (considered to be written by John the Evangelist) refers to the “Synagogue of Satan” and the six-pointed star as the “star of Remphan” referring to the`god’ Saturn?

You can blaspheme all you like, but know in your heart that expressing a personal bias is not expressing the facts of the matter.

It’s not Muslims who say Christ is boiling in excrement.

This is exclusively a Muslim statement. Servants of the Anti-Christ Muhammad lie for Satan in an attempt to distract Infidels. The practice is known as Taqiyya. (1)

Of course as Satanist, you already knew this. You were just hoping that as a Christian, I would not.

You are no Christian if you put the lives of Christ killers over all others

I do not put the lives of the followers of the Satan/Allah, the killers of Christ, over all others.

Your Lord Satan, enemy of Jews and Christians, directed the execution the Son of God.

It wasn’t Muslims who demanded the murder of Christ

The Cult of Satan may not have been known as “Muslim” until hundreds of years later when the Anti-Christ Muhammad walked the Earth.

However, there is one certain TRUTH.

As followers of the Cult of Satan/Allah today’s Muslim followers of the Anti-Christ Muhammad bear 100% of the responsibility and blame for that crime against the Son of God. No amount of Taqiyya deception can shift the burden of that Ultimate Evil to any other faith.

No Muslim will ever enter Heaven without Contrition and Absolution. I would help you if I could, but your soul was permanently damaged by your Inshallah submission to Satan and the Anti-Christ. All I can do is offer you forgiveness and pity.
_______

Pop Shia Warner, I PITY YOU 😢
_______

(1) http://muslimfact.com/bm/terror-in-the-name-of-islam/islam-permits-lying-to-deceive-unbelievers-and-bri.shtml

It’s not Muslims who say Christ is boiling in excrement. It wasn’t Muslims who demanded the murder of Christ and took every opportunity they could to make sure He died. You are no Christian if you put the lives of Christ killers over all others

Correction:

For the record, i am not a hate crime advocate. either one violated someone’s rights by way some act against them or one did not

If George Zimmerman had been named Jorge Gonzalez we would have never heard of the shooting.

For the record, i am not a hate rime advocate. either you violated someone’s rights by way some act against or you did not

As for your venture to make the matter about me . . . Oy veh. Shocking and surprisingly not.

In response,

You ability to make over generalized assertions and then declaring anyone who doesn’t do as you think they ought is a this or that in case “racist’ is funny. Unlike the general public. I tend to the actual meaning of the term. The treatment of others in violation of the /the constitution based on artifacts of no real meaning/superficial. Just because someone uses an epithet does not by that alone make one a racist. Laughing , I have done neither and you are on about this application -strange, wrong but interesting.

Now should you have evidence that I have in any manner engaged in violating another’s right based on skin color — you are welcome to introduce the same.

I have entertained your nonsensical personal assail. Which has nothing to do with the issue at hand.

A. “Correct. Loitering is an abnormal behavior but not a criminal one.’

Nothing abnormal about it — billions do it every day — most of us do it more than once — just people hanging out. And as I make clear not by itself suspicious or crime and there’s no evidence that the young man was so engaged. And I make no suggestion that it is.

B. “Also true. However does Trayvon express fear:
— Reflexive / Adrenaline Flight — No. He did not disengage.
— Reflexive / Adrenaline Fight — No. He did not turn and engage.”

Well, that’s interesting you grant the point. By do so, you acknowledge that your assessment about what constitutes a fear response was incorrect. That is an admission based on fact — So clearly acting in self defense was perfectly reasonable. Now you want to say that the manner of self defense he chose indicates he was not afraid . . . laugh. It’s not hard. That young man was afraid of the creepy guy stalking him. He makes attempts to avoid him. According to Mr Zimmerman (though nothing supports it) he says that the young man is running and that run is away from him. Now there is no evidence that the young man ever entrapped Mr. Zimmerman by deliberate intent or tat Mr Zimmerman was trapped at all. But if it was deliberate — that would still be an act of self defence. Your pretzel has in fact ensnared you. what is really funny is the military skill you give the teenager. That is really really rich and interesting. But again, that only reinforces the obvious, the young man was scared of the creepy adult and unable to avoid him, made the choice to ‘engage’ as you call it. The fact that he used stealth in self defence does not diminish the young man’s fear or his act of self defense. Both are obvious and both reasonable.

C. You have no idea if that young man’s ct of self defense would have ended M. Zimmerman’s life.

D. Obfuscate: render obscure, unclear, or unintelligible. I make no such attempt.

1. But let’s be clear my response on the matter is to your unsupported accusation about me. You introduce as a comment about my person. I never introduce the matter of color in this exchange and for this discussion it has no relevance for me to do so. I keep my comments strictly to behavior.

2. Now the term cracker is not really racist. It’s a term referring to a red neck . it is derived from whites working in the hot son and getting sunburned on the backs of their necks. So when the reference is made it simply means a white person. No aggressive action takes place in conjunction with the term – so there’s no real ca for a hate crime. But it is juxtaposed against a very peculiar reference, the n-word. And here your press for a hate crime falls apart. That term as i understand it has various meanings – depending on the context, one of them is a derrogatory reference to another who is bothersome, causing trouble, harrassing, hassling . . . it about a condition in this case it indicates that the young man’s anxiety has increased. Because while whites may use the term in reference to blacks, black would not use the term in reference to a meaning of white, it has a meaning of the condition hassled, harassed, threatened . . .creepy, etc. Mr. Zimmerman is black an the young man doesn’t think he’s black as indicated by the term

“cracker”

no that reference is an indication of stress. What I find odd is that none of this with respect to how people communicate, especially how males might respond to each other is fairly obvious. That young man make every effort to withdraw, that pursuit continues, exacerbating the tension, increasing the fear, the anxiety, the creepiness. As a buffer/response against or to the same the young man engages in self defense.

D. No that young man that teenager commits an act of self defense — which you already admit is one possible response to fear and reasonable. A hate crime is an act predicated on one’s animus. There is not an iota of evidence that the young an in question was motivated in that manner. He does not initiate ant aggressive or even assertive behavior based on the gentleman in question skin color. Those references are purely conditional and identification – that’s it. Now the game is played that any reference to the superficial during an altercation constitutes a hate crime – wrong.

Motivated by: https://definitions.uslegal.com/h/hate-crime/

Based on your own line of analysis had the color been an issue, the young man would have attacked immediately on the site of the “creepy guy” because he was white. It never happens as a motivator. So your assessment once again by the actual meaning of terms — is incorrect. Like obfuscate — I never even tip my toe in that water, there’s no need and no evidence.

correction:

You utterly misunderstand the context of that exchange. she is teasing him — she is making an attempt to decrease his tension by making a joke — those darn teenagers ever making light. The young man responds, that it is not really funny . . . or it may be funny but at that moment he is is clearly uncomfortable.

“Don’t tease me like that.”

loitering is not inherently anything — it means hanging about it also means hanging about doing nothing — in other words — not committing a crime.

Correct. Loitering is an abnormal behaviour but not a criminal one.

There is no definitive response to fear. People respond to threat in any number of ways an one simply does not know …
“fight or flight” a natural response in humans and animals alike.

Also true. However does Trayvon express fear:
— Reflexive / Adrenaline Flight — No. He did not disengage.
— Reflexive / Adrenaline Fight — No. He did not turn and engage.

We know from the record that there were several “non-adrenaline” minutes between Zimmerman losing visual contact and Trayvon’s attack.

The behaviour was not fearful. Just the opposite — Trayvon’s behaviour was pre-meditated, rational, planned, military style tactics. If Zimmerman had not been armed, he would be dead.
_____

You keep trying to obfuscate the race issue, but again fail on the facts.

Trayvon called Zimmerman “Cracker”, an openly racist term, before he calmly planned his offense. All rational non-racists understand that Trayvon committed a hate crime against Zimmerman because of his lighter skin tone.

Only racists, such as yourself, believe that Trayvon is innocent.

As you have a closed mind. I choose this point to disengage. I cannot get past your irrational skin color based hate. I can only give you one parting piece of advice:

Be Less Racist. You Will be Happier in the Long Run.

PEACE 😷

“I became suspicious of the mainstream narrative when I saw video footage of the gated community. It was clear anyone on foot could easily elude anyone in a vehicle. Trayvon had plenty of time to return to the safety of his home. Of course, you probably subscribe to the theory put forth by Rachel Jeantel, the phony witness, that Zimmerman was a gay rapist and Trayvon did not return home to protect his family. Giggle. Snort.”

You utterly misunderstand the context of that exchange. she is easing him — she is making an attempt to decrease his tension by making a joke — those darn teenagers ever making light. The young man responds, that it is really funny . . . or it may be funny but at that moment he is is clearly uncomfortable.
“Don’t tease me like that.”

I am not sure that your admonition about who is up to speed or not can overcome your seeming lack of comprehending the context of that exchange.

It doesn’t matter an ants hill whether Mr. Zimmerman has chose a life of engaging in same sex behavior or not. The issue is that he is stalking a teenager despite every known precautionary standard of the watch and the immediate advice of law enforcement personnel. He is not in the vehicle. And everything indicates that the young man in question was threatened . . . Mr. Zimmerman’s reckless choices exacerbated a simple kid walking and talking on the phone on his way home.

“We don’t know if Trayvon used the word “creepy” or not. The woman who testified to speaking on the cell phone with Trayvon was not the woman who actually spoke with Trayvon. That’s the major revelation of the documentary. Get up to speed. If the true “Brittany Diamond Eugene” is questioned, we may find out Trayvon’s quick temper may have earned him a permanent time out. Giggle. Snort”

No. The exact phrase he uses is

“creepy *@#$ cracker” (body part) or “cracka” even the use of the “n word” is description of his state of mind.

He obviously feeling threatened.

Her subsequent insecurities don’t change —

You might want to actually listen to her testimony. It is devastating. And corroborates the assessment —

it matters not a twiddle what his disposition is about anyone — all indications are — he is avoiding conflict.

And the prosecution’s behavior — verifies – in my view — just how devastating that conversation is.

“However, loitering is inherently suspicious. Which is why Trayvon was being legally observed.”

A. As has been noted, suspicious is in the mind of the beholder and while I I certainly challenge anyone’s assumption that loitering, if that is in fact what he was doing is nit suspicious, nor it is a crime nor the point. The real issue is how one responds to that suspicion held in the mind. So again,

1. no evidence he was loitering
2. nothing about his behavior was criminal —
3. nothing about his behavior was criminally suspicious
4. we have no idea what he was doing
5. we do know
a. he was walking
b. he was on the phone
c. at the time he was seen his conduct was neither suspicious nor criminal
6. that his conduct at was to avoid the “creepy guy” following him

False loitering is not inherently anything — it means hanging about it also means hanging about doing nothing — in other words — not committing a crime. He was visiting with – staying his father — that location was his residence. He was legally walking where he resided.

Nice try . . . good grief. Its no wonder so many innocent people land in altercations — when doing nothing is suspicions behavior and doing nothing at night apparently is cause stalking. Your suspicion does not a crime make.

B. “Creepy” is not a crime. But the definition of the term he references in the phone call — fact as noted — it goes to his state of mind. And that word in every way indicates that he felt at threat — by the guy following him which is why the term is a synonym for “threatening.” Not by his appearance but by his behavior — stalking and that stalking against advise and protocol. No. Mr. Zimmerman’s behavior was not stupid it was reckless and made so by his provocative behavior.

c. “The facts disprove this assertion. He clearly was not scared. If Trayvon had been scared, he would have gone to his safe home or otherwise disengaged.”

I hate to break the news to you — but a soothsayer you are not. There is no definitive response to fear. People respond to threat in any number of ways an one simply does not know. Members in service who may have to deal with threats spend months, and years preparing how to respond to threatening situations hat they by choice of their service may encounter. Responding to said threat environments is always introduced as “fight or flight” a natural response in humans and animals alike.

Here’s a short course for you:
https://www.britannica.com/science/fight-or-flight-response —

and if the above source is too hard
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fight-or-flight_response

There’s no evidence of any ambush. There’s an unsupported narrative regarding an ambush. But suppose that narrative is correct, that is the fight response to threat and it is reasonable in light of being stalked. Before the stalker surprises me, I while surprise it. The hunter becomes the hunted so to speak — that’s called self defense. And it is entirely reasonable.

(And why my walks have been crucial to my own recovery in that regard — note to self.)

Oy Veh and Oy!

Frankly, I have no idea hat you are talking about. Skin color is simply not in play in this discussion. It simply does not matter a lick if what the skin tones are here. It’s the behavior in play. I generally avoid people – regardless of their skin tones. But when I did not, I trained people of multiple shades, ethnic backgrounds (nationalities), and genders etc. I am unaware of any complaint or suggestion that anything other than performance matter to me. Here I am tending to the performances (the behaviors) of those involved. In this discussion have not referenced anything but behaviors. If that young man was Loretta Lynn, my comments would be no different. If that young man was Her General Herman Goring, my responses would be the same.

As to what the response is in a state of fear — your assessment is not only wrong, it is by the record – flat out incorrect and it is incorrect in every way.

D. “There are no minds available for you to convince.”

I think you mean there are no minds

— Laugh.

so sayeth the preacher: Beware of those coming crying peace peace when there is no peace or peace peace when they have war in mind. I have to say, your personal attacks betray any suggestion that I should expect peace from you. “Calling me a “racist’ of all things — laugh.

Peace not on a bet

We don’t know if Trayvon used the word “creepy” or not. The woman who testified to speaking on the cell phone with Trayvon was not the woman who actually spoke with Trayvon. That’s the major revelation of the documentary. Get up to speed. If the true “Brittany Diamond Eugene” is questioned, we may find out Trayvon’s quick temper may have earned him a permanent time out. Giggle. Snort.

I became suspicious of the mainstream narrative when I saw video footage of the gated community. It was clear anyone on foot could easily elude anyone in a vehicle. Trayvon had plenty of time to return to the safety of his home. Of course, you probably subscribe to the theory put forth by Rachel Jeantel, the phony witness, that Zimmerman was a gay rapist and Trayvon did not return home to protect his family. Giggle. Snort.

Loitering is not a crime by itself, I have no ides what the statute is in Florida or that particular jurisdiction

However, loitering is inherently suspicious. Which is why Trayvon was being legally observed.

I hate to break it to you, but any tough guy who uses the word “creepy” in the context of that environment is at the very least nervous — scared.

The facts disprove this assertion. He clearly was not scared. If Trayvon had been scared, he would have gone to his safe home or otherwise disengaged.

Trayvon, was angered by the creep who stood in the way of his smash-&-grab car robbery scheme. So, Trayvon laid an ambush to get rid of the ‘offensive creep’.
____

Being ‘creepy’ is not a crime. It certainly does not warrant death.

Regardless of what one feels about Zimmerman’s lack of wisdom, the truth remains obvious. Trayvon began the fight to the death when he launched a surprise attack. Zimmerman, in justified fear for his life, did the right thing.
____

You can, of course, continue to bloviate if you want to. However, you will not change any minds.

— One must be racist to accept that Trayvon is innocent.
— 100% of racists already believe Trayvon is innocent.

There are no minds available for you to convince.

PEACE 😷

“Zimmerman calls the police at 7:09 PM. At least 20 minutes of Trayvon’s actions are unaccounted for. What was Trayvon doing? At the very least he was loitering and thus suspicious.’

The same thing anyone might have been doing. And by and large not a crime and none of our or my business. By what is on the record he is chatting on the phone with, a young lady no less . . .

Ohhh shock of hock teens on a phone when they should be doing their homework, shock of shock teen meandering about wasting time, shock of shock teen boys and teen girls on the phone talking all things vital to them, but of no real meaning or purpose to adults . . .

and the shocker of all shockers . . .

teens about and no one has a clue what they are doing — not even them.

Loitering is not a crime by itself, I have no ides what the statute is in Florida or that particular jurisdiction —

News flash . . . What are teens doing . . . even inquiring parents don’t know

But that you assume he was loitering based on . . . . wait for it . . .

your lack of knowledge if what he was doing is an interesting bit of evidence. I am not even sure if you are resident of a location that one can loiter. Laugh.

Suspicion is not the issue. Mr. Zimmerman could have been suspicious all the live long day — how he responded based on the same is the issue. He responded to those suspicions as a “creepy guy” following a teenager. In other words he was:

creepy or scary, eerie, ominuos, sinister, scary, unpleasant, awful, hair raising, macabre
nightmarish . . . . disturbing, unsettling, wierd, forbidding, frightening, horrible, terrifying . . .

https://www.powerthesaurus.org/creepy

I hate to break it to you, but any tough guy who uses the word “creepy” in the context of that environment is at the very least nervous — scared. To think that teen boys however tougher can’t be unnerved by the behavior of adults is a very interesting perspective. When I walk at night I get creeped out on occasion by my surroundings, alerted at strange noises . . . imagine being trailed at night . . . by an unknown person of unknown motive(s) an your alone.

good grief

a failure to respond further is not intended as disrespect – I just have to attend to some matters . . .

it has been or is interesting and regrettable

Trayvon purchased his snacks at 6:24 PM. According to Google Maps, it takes 19 minutes to walk from the store where the purchase was made to Trayvon’s home. Zimmerman calls the police at 7:09 PM. At least 20 minutes of Trayvon’s actions are unaccounted for. What was Trayvon doing? At the very least he was loitering and thus suspicious.

Here’s the difference between Trayvon Martin and the current executive. His parents aren’t rich enough to move him from school to school, get special counseling and be well connected.

“There is no rational, legal, or moral basis for Trayvon’s drug induced ambush, first strike, and attempted murder of Zimmerman.”

First, there was only a trace amount of THC, so any suggestion that this incident is the result of being drug induced is buffered and more importantly, that trace amount is irrelevant.

Second, sure male bravado about who they can and how much they enjoy getting the better of the other guy — snore and snore . . . laughing. But also irrelevant. Suppose a person likes fighting. He was not fighting that night. It was not the phone call that instigated or warranted the stalking behavior of Mr. Zimmerman. There is nothing violent about that young man’s behavior, despite the attempt describe the behavior as suspicious — those descriptions just don’t make the grade. Mr. Zimmerman has no idea about his background and nothing that young man does warrants the targeting. Furthermore — blaming the victim because in the mind of Mr. Zimmerman he was wandering a bout the neighborhood” something he could not know since he had no idea where he lived. Which is moot point because in avoiding the “creepy guy” — that is no longer an issue. The avoidance is.

Rational and legal defending oneself against a “creepy guy” who has been following you in dimly lit complex at night.

I have one simple response for your narrative, look up the definition for stalking statues in Florida.

by the time Mr. Zimmerman calls the police he had already been following him, for no apparent reasons except for what his mind could conjure up. It was his behavior that caused a the young man to engage in evasive behavior . . . which only fed Mr. Zimmerman’s already warped sense of suspicious, such that despite the police dispatcher advisory he continued to follow — stalk the young man.

Now I have no issues with his suspicious, fine. But his acting on them in the manner he did initiated all the events that followed. If anyone was looking for a confrontation it was Mister Zimmerman. had he simply stopped after that call, I think there would be room to consider some other aspects. But that choice was pivotal and telling.

Laughing. He could have crawled on his hands and knees — in response to a “creepy guy” following him. That’s rich. That young man’s response was absolutely understandable based on the events. He couldn’t escape him when he was “running” Mr. Zimmerman’s words. is worst descriptions don’t make the suspicious meter based on some “creepy guy” following him. Furthermore, Mr. Zimmerman is not stationary, he is following during that conversation. The “thug” as opposed to going on the offensive, moves in the opposite direction. Another reasonable and sane response to a “creepy guy” following you around at night in an apartment complex.

I have no idea how long it takes to reconfigure one’s mind from a would be ‘creepy guy’ following you around. Four all we know that young man could have been hiding hoping not be seen by the creepy guy, not for a fight but to avoid one — but when surprise there’s the “creepy guy” he goes on the offensive — totally reasonable. Which is exactly why the advisory from the dispatcher and neighborhood watch protocols actually discourage anything that escalates an encounter.

I have walked. spoken and chewed gum while on the phone at the same time. He’s manner may sound calm to you, but his description is just grasping at straws to justify the call. Which is fine, but then he makes that choice to continue following him. This behavior is stalking, and it is unnecessary and provocative. An a look at the national Neighborhood Watch references to suspicious behavior — Trayvon Martin doesn’t even fit that bill.

Look I am not pulling rabbits out your empty hat — it is what is on the record. There’s one person not in any manner violating the law or even custom and there’s another person breaking custom ad the law who is the adult trained to do just the opposite of what he does.

In the evening alone — its reasonable to avoid someone you don;t know, who does not engage in any communication with you, but follows you around —- to engage in self defense, against a “creepy guy” following you around a dimly lit complex —- very reasonable course of action.

“Do you really believe that Trayvon had the right to ambush and kill Zimmerman for ‘observing him from a distance’?”

Laughing and absolutely!

So you are willing to be ambushed and die if someone finds your ‘presence at a distance’ objectionable? Really? I have a hard time believing that.
____

Trayvon did something reasonable. He broke contact with the potential threat. Anyone with legitimate intentions and sound mind would use the opportunity to disengage with the danger. However, Trayvon had illegitimate intentions and unsound, probably chemically impacted mind. (1)

There are a series of compelling articles on the web that describe Martin’s alleged abuse of a powerful, home-made PCP-like drug called “Lean” (also known as “Skittles”). Its reported side-effects can include breaks with reality, extreme paranoia and fits of violence.

He did something even stupider than Zimmerman. Trayvon intentionally laid an ambush, will the intent to to assault and the potential to kill.
_____

There is absolutely no idea that Trayvon Martin is setting a trap — he really just wants to talk to his girlfriend and (get home). at some in time they run into each other again and this time, Mr. Martin decides to act in self defense

Wrong on the facts.

If Travyon had gone home rather than a lengthy excursion through the neighborhood, he would have made it home. He did not want to talk to his girlfriend and (get home).

Which girlfriend are you talking about. The one the phone? Or, the totally different person at the trial? The inconsistencies in the prosecution story were abysmal, but I don’t want to get off point.

They did not accidentally run into each other again and this time, Mr. Martin decides to act in self defense. In an act of offense, Trayvon addled by a PCP-analogue initiated combat. An immoral assault on what he believes was an unarmed, defseless, pudgy foe.

In his own words, Trayvon revelled in causing pain and injury to others: (2)

The Judge in the Zimmerman trial just ruled that the jury will not get to see numerous text messages on Trayvon Martin’s phone regarding his prowess at fighting, including texts as to how to punch someone in the nose and make them bleed.

His pudgy, but not defenseless foe had a pistol.
____

If you want to say that Zimmerman was unwise or even stupid. Fair enough…

However unwise or stupid… There is no rational, legal, or moral basis for Trayvon’s drug induced ambush, first strike, and attempted murder of Zimmerman.
____

The real criminals are Trayvon’s parents. Instead of raising a child to be an adult, they allowed a child to become an violent animal. Alas, there is no law that covers their misdeeds. They will have to answer to a higher power.

PEACE 😷
_______

(1) https://directorblue.blogspot.com/2013/07/trayvon-martin-burglary-tools-and-pcp.html

(2) https://legalinsurrection.com/2013/07/breaking-jury-will-not-get-to-see-trayvon-fighting-texts/

Mr. English and his lawyer are playing the same game as the store owners in the Michael Brown case played when they came out and said that they weren’t the ones who called the police on young Mr. Brown. Both are simply trying to avoid the wrath and insanity of the ultra left wing mob and media out for blood in both cases, the facts be damned.

Jesus Christ, quit lying through your teeth. George Zimmerman in no way engaged in any form of stalking of the full of himself punk Trayvon Martin. What he did do is what happens every single day in this country. Every Single Fucking Day, multiple times. Someone in a community calls police because of a suspicious person. There is nothing wrong or illegal about that, nor should there ever be.

Listen to the phone call of Zimmerman talking to the police and try any way possible to call that stalking. I absolutely dare you to. Zimmerman is talking to the police for over 4 minutes in an absolutely calm and perfectly legal manner, in which time the thug Trayvon could have crawled on his hands and knees back to where he was staying.

What happened is what the evidence at trial clearly showed. Trayvon came back to put a ghetto beatdown on someone for ‘disrespecting’ him, but unfortunately for him he got a little more than what he bargained for, and what he absolutely deserved.

uhhh . . . I have already addressed this . . .

And Mr. Zimmerman did not heed that advice. There is absolutely no evidence that that Mr. Zimmerman was aware that the person he was stalking was a criminal. Nothing suggests he was a a party to any break-ins. The fact there were break is not cause enough to stalk this particular young man.

————

No kidding he went forward and the young man in his own defense responded to someone he did not know after creating an aura of hostility by following him. He could and should have immediately identified himself as a neighborhood watch member and was checking out the neighborhood —

One doesn’t need to engage in anything threatening to accomplish that and still maintain a safe distance.

the minute you grant this,

“Where Zimmerman did make an error is — After he lost visual contact, he went forward. Without support, the correct tactic would have been to withdraw to a location with good visibility.”

you admit that he created a situation in which the person he did know had every reason to feel threatened enough to respond in his defense. All of Mr. Zimmerman’s actions that night were predicated on unsupported suspicions in his own mind. I hate to say this but if I am being followed by a grown man — I am going to avoid him and I am going tell my girlfriend some “creepy is following me.”

Mr. Zimmerman’s, says, “there’s something wrong with this guy.” Something wrong like what — generic nonsense. A young man is carrying some goodies he bought at the local art and chit chatting with his girlfriend.

I don’t think we really who did what first, but clearly the person most afraid or under threat and reasonable so is the young man being followed by some guy in dimly apartment complex, whom he openly and admitted by both is attempting to avoid. The young man very early on indicates by way of eye contact that he has his eye on this stalker, whom he doesn’t know has no idea what he wants or why, but is intent on avoiding. There is absolutely no idea that Trayvon Martin is setting a trap — he really just wants to talk to his girlfriend and (get home). at some in time they run into each other again and this time, Mr. Martin decides to act in self defense.

Now for one minute let;s play with your setting trap notion. He is being stalked, he makes a plan to evade or give himself an advantage — self defense in both scenarios. None of which would be an issue if:

1. Mr. Zimmerman was in some identifying clothing
2. Mr. Zimmerman had stayed in his vehicle and waited for police
3. Mr. Zimmerman had heeded the advice of the dispatcher
4. Mr Zimmeran contacted the watch on duty that night and requested assistance or left the matter
5. Mr. Zimmerman could have minded his business that night as he was not on call for duty and contacted either the police or the watch or both and gone home.

instead a grown man made the choice to follow a kid around at night never once indicting that he was part of the watch. He could have called it out . . . yada yada yada. he could have gone in and gotten a flashlight . . . anything to distinguish himself from a “creepy stalker”.

————–

Oy veh . . .

“Do you really believe that Trayvon had the right to ambush and kill Zimmerman for ‘observing him from a distance’?”

Laughing and absolutely!

Stalkers don’t get in your face right, they check you out. And I bet twenty to one that the size, if it as you say is correct, would have caused the young man to be even more confused and somewhat intimidated — as his size alone might have been considered warning for anyone seeking to bother him — so the fact that some creepy guy was following him only heightens the tension and the hostility kicking in the self defense mechanism.

This is not really that complicated.

—————————————-

I am at the moment forced to exercise when I do at night or in dimly lit spaces. But when i walk, tun cross cars, garages, etc. that are open. In the old days, i might have walked and checked to see if someone was hurt or possibly knocked on a door to let them know — their door was open. If I see a woman walking without a light, might have spokes encouragement to do so, offer my light — but these days, and I am sure that in the time of the death of this young man — I tend to my business and unless I see or hear an overt act —-

Because my approach to anyone’s home or person at night could very easily be misinterpreted. I avoid walking behind people at night and exercise caution if I have to pass someone — because they could reasonable have a fear of an unknown — and if I were tun when they turn, speed up when they speed up, stop when they stop or continue approaching — then ll bets are off what is going through their minds.

The person in which the evidence indicates a reasonable expectation of fear is the young man. He is the one avoiding contact. Afterall, if he was just a thug looking for a fight, Mr. Zimmerman presented plenty of opportunities and the evidence is pretty clear he sought to avoid any confrontation wit the creepy guy following him until a situation arose in which he felt he could not.

Calling foul after one has created the hostile environment simply has no veracity.

You make a good point here. Of course, at the other end of the spectrum you have influential media types (including Nora O’Donnell of CBS News) announcing “New video ‘suggests’ young Black man on English property may have only been trying to get a drink of water”. They then show a snippet of video that shows no such thing. It’s the lawyer for the pathetic, grovelling Mr. English who ‘suggests’ this possibility.

In the Florida incident, I will correct one reference — the dispatcher did not give a direct order, but a guidance to avoid any confrontation. Mr. Zimmerman irgored the suggestion.

The clerks on the 911 phone line can gives advice but not orders. They are not sworn law enforcement officers. For the most part, they are working from a script that may or may not fit the situation.

Nothing not one thing in the phone call by Mr. Zimmerman indicates any reason to suspect criminal activity, despite Mr. Zimmerman’s attempt to provide cause for his own actions.

There had been multiple break ins at the housing sub division and the police arrived too late each time. There was a very logical reason to be concerned about strangers in the area.

If Trayvon had gone directly to the store and directly home, there would have been no engagement. Aimlessly wandering in a residential area while not illegal is certainly abnormal. Appearing to examine parked cars, possibly for exposed valuables, is inherently suspicious.

Mr. Zimmerman never makes an attempt to identify who is or why he is following the young man and there is every reason for the young man minding his own business to be suspicious of an unknown person following around.

Maintaining physical separation eliminates the risk of an unintended physical confrontation. Not approaching within speaking distance is the correct procedure.

Where Zimmerman did make an error is — After he lost visual contact, he went forward. Without support, the correct tactic would have been to withdraw to a location with good visibility.

The facts are not in doubt:

— Trayvon intentionally laid a trap for Zimmerman.
— Trayvon closed to combat range and attacked first.
— Trayvon was attempting to kill Zimmerman by pounding his head against a concrete slab.
— Zimmerman used the minimum force needed to save his own life when he shot the the strength trained football player and aspiring MMA combatant that was on top of him.

Do you really believe that Trayvon had the right to ambush and kill Zimmerman for ‘observing him from a distance’?
____

The sad part about this is that Trayvon had been caught with B&E tools and stolen property. If he had been arrested, or at least detained, it would have saved his life. Instead he was back on the street via a “Civil Release”.

PEACE 😷

In the Florida incident, I will correct one reference — the dispatcher did not give a direct order, but a guidance to avoid any confrontation. Mr. Zimmerman irgored the suggestion.

Clearly as indicated via the phone conversation between the young man and his girlfriend, he believes he is being followed, staked and he attempting to avoid the man stalking him. He doesn’t know who the man is. He has no clue what he wants or why he is following him.

Nothing not one thing in the phone call by Mr. Zimmerman indicates any reason to suspect criminal activity, despite Mr. Zimmerman’s attempt to provide cause for his own actions. He is looking around, he looks creepy, he has his hands in waisteband — (an attempt to suggest a weapon?), a series of “break ins” — unrelated in any manner to the young man in question. he is looking at me . . . nothing in his comments suggest criminal intent or suspicious behavior. Interestingly enough, Mr. Zimmerman identifies the young man as a teenager. The photo taken and distributed of Trayvon Martin was taken is months before the incident.

Mr. Zimmerman never makes an attempt to identify who is or why he is following the young man and there is every reason for the young man minding his own business to be suspicious of an unknown person following around.

Here is the stalking laws in Florida.

https://www.lawserver.com/law/state/florida/statutes/florida_statutes_784-048

I know that as a conservative in the minds of many of you, I am supposed to hop on board any killing of any black man anywhere and every time regardless of the issues and events involved. But in these cases, the evidence demonstrably is against the initiators. Their actions caused the sequence of events.
——————

But by all means and with haste let’s import those hispanics to replace Us citizens.

“The video shows the unarmed arbery attacked the armed white guys.!!! That makes no sense but that’s what the vid shows.”

It simply does not matter whether that young man was a genius or doorknob, nothing warranted staling him, chasing him, pursuing him in any manner. In so doing the men who initiated the contact exceeded their authority and caused the chain of events. The video shows a young man acting in self defense from men who were in pursuit of him to arrest him — he was entitled to defend himself from that assault.

The initial report makes that case quite clear, as as no felonious conduct was witnessed and none support an attempt or intent to such conduct — their actions and their actions alone are responsible for the events of that day — even the video is a hoax training film or some other such gambit. Suspicion simply is not enough to curtail another’s freedom and reasonable suspicion isn’t even close in the Georgia incident.

The video in context of the incident —

“From what I can gather from the video Mr. Arbery seems to looking for the proper space in that house; which he and his family are going to purchase after the renos are complete, so he can set up his genetic research lab.”

It simply does not matter whether that young man was a genius or doorknob, nothing warranted staling him, chasing him, pursuing him in any manner. In so doing the men who initiated the contact exceeded their authority and caused the chain of events. The video shows a young man acting in self defense from men who were in pursuit of him to arrest him — he was entitled to defend himself from that assault.

The initial report makes that case quite clear, as as no felonious conduct was witnessed and none support an attempt or intent to such conduct — their actions and their actions alone are responsible for the events of that day — even the video is a hoax training film or some other such gambit. Context matters. Suspicion simply is not enough to curtail another’s freedom.

Some of yo are very funny. By and large when this incident occurred, Mr. Zimmerman was an NRA hero then as cooler heads prevailed and more was revealed about the nature of the man’s judgment and same rationale perspective — most of the same whites who claim hero are running as fast as they can in any way possible.

Hard to admit that you simply had a knee-jerk reaction to support your assumptions that a young man visiting his father was essentially staked and despite attempts to evade his stalker to no avail decided to confront the same and was shot because the stalker was losing the confrontation.

an incident that was entirely initiated by Mr. Zimmerman — who ignored instructions from an authored authority to do nothing further until the police arrived. it appears tat even common sense is a hopscotch tool to agendas.

You can tell this was written by a jew due to the special focus on Soros being an antisemite. Not “antiwhite master” or “antichristian master,” noooo we must hate Soros for his alleged hatred of jews.

Is it not amazing how Muslims, like Pop Shia Warner, are wrong 100% of the time?

As a Christian , I oppose The IslamSoros and his desire to exterminate all Christian infidels. One of the main tactics of Muslims, including The IslamoSoros, is using lies to pit infidels (Christians and Jews) against each other.

You should return to your Shia masters in Iran for retraining. Your inability to distinguish Christians from Jews is a serious failure. Your painfully obvious, incompetent Taqiyya lies are even worse.

PEACE 😷

You can tell this was written by a jew due to the special focus on Soros being an antisemite. Not “antiwhite master” or “antichristian master,” noooo we must hate Soros for his alleged hatred of jews.
This is how zionists always do it: claim someone hates jews first and foremost, then include “and whites and Christians” if the jew hook didn’t work

George Zimmerman was just too inexperienced at this point in life to realize that his apartment complex was already not worth fighting for. Because the management had already begun the process of welcoming large numbers of the Trayvon types no matter how many thugs he might have shot. Stop by this same complex now and you’ll see it’s likely full of loitereing blacks.

They were so desirous of a White being the shooter, they invented the term “white hispanic” which no one most likely ever heard before – I know I hadn’t.

And for the sole reason that it would make Zimmermann seem “more evil,” rather like the way Hollywood makes villains “more evil” by giving them blond hair and blue eyes.

The truly surreal aspect of is that there’s nothing white-looking about Zimmermann at all, and not even the most desperate latino “whitewasher” (ie someone who presents a misleading picture of the whiteness of his ethnic group) would attempt to claim Zimmermann as an example of a white hispanic. It simply didn’t matter to the MSM frauds.

#JEWS@everyBOTTLENECK :

While the US could live better without international Jews, Jews could not survive without their host countries. They are notorious throughout history of eschewing productive and manual work. They are middlemen and hucksters. That means non-productive in terms of creating real wealth and value. They like to run toll booths in general.

Look at the shtetyls in Eastern Europe which were a major hub of world Jewry. Without being able to fleece goy, thy devolve to poverty.

#JEWS@everyBOTTLENECK :

Our (((friends))) and their fellow travelers, place themselves at the controlling choke points of civilization, as part of their evolutionary crime-family method.

God Incarnate Jesus has told (((them))) “You are the children of your father the devil…” (John 8:44):

The major failure of Talmudic Judaism is that the doctrine itself is predatory, which allows the worst impulses of man to be set free. It is ok to murder, steal from, and host the goyim. Why there is even a pre-crime prayer to sanction future thefts, murder, and mayhem.

#TheInescapableBinomial:CHRISTorChaos :

Chaos and divide-and-conquer techniques are part of the evolutionary method. Our (((friends))) evolutionary methods have been honed over thousands of years.

#SelfDefenseNECESSITATES:DestroyShabbatGoy:

I have demonstrated (see my comment history) the exact money mechanics that are needed to segregate and expel Jews (and Muslims(*)) to their homelands. It would be easy to do, save the paid-off and co-opted Congress.

Good fences make good neighbors.

*Globo Homo includes some branches of Islam, mostly Sunni Wahabists, funded by recycled petrodollars to become “good mercenaries.” International Finance Zion (ZOG) makes its easy money by moving its “finance capital” around the world, looking for cheap labor.

Huntley Haverstock – that was a great article, well-written! Thank you.

“The main problem with “The Trayvon Hoax” is that Gilbert is something of a right-wing crackpot, as Loury and McWhorter readily acknowledged. … ”

He certainly sounds like that here.
This guy is a lawyer? If this were a summary to the jury, they jury members would just be scratching their heads.
His argument is totally confused.
Only those who already are predisposed to believe him will be able to follow this mess.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YfvO-hzFRCY
Video Link

At this point we have to ask if any of this was real. Actors, cut-outs and no one died. Easier that way when the purpose is to present the spectacle.

Ohhhh good grief . . . .

Mr. Zimmerman should have made his presence known and clear. He should have approached young M. Martin and said,

“Hey I m a neighborhood watchman, I just wanted to make sure you weren’t here to seal something or maybe can help you. Instead operating on his unfounded suspicions engaged in following some guy around in the night – who did not who was or what he was doing and eventually confronted him.

These scenarios are not that complex.

The biggest observable difference between the two possible fathers is in the ears and lips. Barack Obama’s bear no resemblance to his stated father (see lower lips and flat ears versus ears that stand out). His ears are close to Frank Davis.

If you follow what ACTUALLY happened (I know that’s hard to do since you have to actually look at what happened and not what you pretend happened), the “so-called jogger” rather than running away, a choice that was available to him, attacked the man demanding to TALK to him and was taking his shotgun away. His life wasn’t taken for a petty crime as you full well know, but it doesn’t fit your lying narrative. Let’s not let facts get in the way of a useful story, no matter how farfetched or untrue. It will sell. His life was taken in self defense, which of course white men don’t have a right to when a black man is involved, right? One more get whitey twist on a phony get the ni#$@r story. I would say you should be ashamed of yourself but I doubt there is any shame left in you. So sad.

Yet pointing that out makes one an anti-Semite. It’s evil whites who have an irrational dislike of Jews.

But Obama is built like a skinny, not like a Bantu.

Look, while I’m agnostic on the question (I see no reason to believe one claim or the other), what you say is rather unconvincing — full body fotos of Frank Marshall Davis are difficult to find — but in a 1940s foto, he appears to be barely bigger, in height and body size, than his white wife –> link — remember, back then the average height of an American woman was doubtless under 5’4″ — also, obviously he did appear to have a predilection for white women, and Obama’s mother seemed to be sexually promiscuous and uninhibited about having sex with black men; perhaps political sympathies played a role there (I don’t know).

Like I said, the only way to resolve it is via DNA tests.

The video shows the unarmed arbery attacked the armed white guys.!!! That makes no sense but that’s what the vid shows.

I take it that you’ve never been to the movies. An unarmed person disarming an armed one is the easiest thing in the world. Works every time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FisnsAkj_5A
Video Link

“””From what I can gather from the video Mr. Arbery seems to looking for the proper space in that house; which he and his family are going to purchase after the renos are complete, so he can set up his genetic research lab. Its so obvious. How can anyone not see that. The killing of Mr. Arbery is horrible and we may never know how great his contribution to mankind would have been. We will never know if he could have found a vaccine/cure for Covid-20 or even Covid -21. Perhaps he would have been on the first flight to Mars. These are things we will never know.”””

Yes – the fake news press has gone wild portraying ahmaud as a saint. Wikipedia says he has a conviction for both a theft and for a gun crime.!!! He was a thug and i doubt he could even read.

The video shows the unarmed arbery attacked the armed white guys.!!! That makes no sense but that’s what the vid shows.

the Conservative Treehouse … is an alright site but neocon as HELL.

It would be better to describe the site as Christian Populist.

Treehouse is an active opponent of Globalist Neocon military adventurism, such as putting U.S. Boots on the ground in Ukraine and/or Iran.
_____

Their recent series on ‘at home’ vs. ‘away from home’ food supply chain issues in the face of the WUHAN-19 pandemic is excellent.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/03/26/phase-four-supply-chain-prioritizes-proteins-return-manufactured-processed-grain-products-still-lag/

There are plenty of calories available for purchase.

The shelf gaps are created primarily by a lack of retail/grocery packaging. For example, the restaurant/industrial milk supply chain uses 2.5 gallon (or larger) bags not labelled for individual sale. And, there is minimal excess capacity to manufacture 1 gallon (or smaller) retail containers.

PEACE 😷

Most of this was firmly established by Sundance over at the Conservative Treehouse years ago during the case. It is an alright site but neocon as HELL. The female who runs the site is some nutjob Christian Fundamentalist and I suspect Sundance is a ” neutral” smart Jew like Mr. Unz. is. I got thrown off the site after the female was ranting “Death to all people who oppose Christ” and alot of similar bs. And I replied “Well , what do you think of Jews then?” Needless to say that doesn’t go over in neocon land , might as well be Breitbart. But Sundance , he is OK, and he does good honest research about notable cases, such as the Trayvon Marin/George Zimmerman incident. His research was worthy of a Pultizer and not some BS Pulitzer, like “All the President’s Men” .

If you go wayyyy back on Treehouse , you can read all the interesting detail about old “Trayvon”incident and the whole scene , better than any book about it, But this new book does add a couple small details not already known. Mostly just to prove Lawyer Crump is more a charlatan and a lair. Crump needed to be disbarred then, moreso now. Typical BGI

Hey, you tired old fart. I am perfectly capable of understanding all of the things you mention but I doubt that you are capable of proving that any of it is applicable to this situation. If so, why don’t you give it a try instead of resorting to pointless insults? I could be on Facebook if I wanted that bullshit.

And the media spin is running wide open. Throttle is locked and seat belts fastened. We have an electrician now.

Ahmaud Arbery remembered as ‘humble guy’ with plans to become an electrician

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/ahmaud-arbery-remembered-as-humble-guy-with-plans-to-become-an-electrician/ar-BB14auZo?li=AAggFp4#image=BB14auZo_1|2

But Obama is built like a skinny, not like a Bantu. For that reason alone I would go with Sr. as the father. But thanks for the links.

Perhaps he would have been on the first flight to Mars.

Missed out there, but he may still be on the second flight to Comet Hale-Bopp. Only G-d can say.

A dog that goes after chickens must be put down. Once a dog tastes blood, it cannot be “redeemed” and must be “put down”.
Maybe the same treatment would be appropriate for our black “transgressors”.

“Expendable” implies that they were actually useful at one time.

A used condom or empty wine bottle are expendable now, but were previously of value.

These people–not so much.

“His crime was going out for a box of Skittles”.

Maybe that’s why he got shot, Cucky Wuck–Skittles come in bags.

Peddle your European/Canadian cuckery BS elsewhere.

I’m out of agree points but you hit the nail on the head. That is one reason they have been kicked out of 109 countries multiple times. The son of the Chief Rabbi of Rome has even written how in medieval times they caught and sacrificed gentile children for the Jews feast of Purim. That is the main reason they were thrown out of England.

Right – Not familiar with this latest nigger incident, but everyone knows you don’t go through other peoples buildings and property especially at night unless you have business there. Got exactly what he deserved. Most important the owners were able to defend their property. Property ownership and our right to defend it is the no. 1 target for the Jews.

Trespassing and looking for construction tools you can pawn is a perfectly valid jogging technique.

You can’t see what went on in front of the pickup truck.

From what I can gather from the video Mr. Arbery seems to looking for the proper space in that house; which he and his family are going to purchase after the renos are complete, so he can set up his genetic research lab. Its so obvious. How can anyone not see that. The killing of Mr. Arbery is horrible and we may never know how great his contribution to mankind would have been. We will never know if he could have found a vaccine/cure for Covid-20 or even Covid -21. Perhaps he would have been on the first flight to Mars. These are things we will never know.

*****Arbery was blocked by Travis and Gregory McMichael with their guns drawn and ready to open fire or at least Travis’s was. They trapped and cornered Arbery thus provoking a fight response in him. He had to fear for his life and he impulsively and instinctually defended himself. Sure, an argument can be made that his strategy for defending himself was rather foolish, but then again, when you are in fear for your life, you don’t always make the most intelligent choices if you have any options at all and Arbery didn’t have many options****

Arbery wasn’t cornered.!!! And he had options. Like going the other way. But he chose to attack two armed men while he himself was unarmed.. It’s the two white men who had no choice but to fight back.

***The single most offensive part of the fakery was the “picture” of Travyon that was 8-10 years out of date. Trayvon was a strength trained football player with substantial physical capabilities. Not a 70-pound elementary school student.***

what makes you think the pic was of a young trayvon.? It could have been any 10 year old black kid.

…why are the Jews speaking French in an ad on Chinese TV?

That’s not the ad(dunno what it is), the ad is at the link at the bottom of the comment.

It’s competition at some level but not like between two freestanding cultures. Not anything like the US vs Russia or China. Jews would be nothing without the host countries they live in. Israel is too new and dependent on the US for me to say they are a bona fide country.

While the US could live better without international Jews, Jews could not survive without their host countries. They are notorious throughout history of eschewing productive and manual work. They are middlemen and hucksters. That means non-productive in terms of creating real wealth and value. They like to run toll booths in general.

Look at the shtetyls in Eastern Europe which were a major hub of world Jewry. Without being able to fleece goy, thy devolve to poverty.

So it has aspects of parasitism mixed in with competition. It’s a weird relationship.

Still, they are threatened by white culture while they covet what white culture produces. Usurpers.

Your people shoot each other over 8-ball jackets and Air-Jordan sneakers. Your people open fire if “dissed”. Your people commit crimes at 13x your percent of the population. Your people often scope out White neighborhoods looking to rob, mug or rape the innocent.

White people shoot to defend their families, neighborhoods and themselves. Since your people are loyal to no one, you wouldn’t understand that. “Racist” means White and you guys have used it so much, it no longer works.

I generally eschew the crass term “sheboon” in favor of the more genteel “chimpess” but in this case…

You don’t know what “in lieu of” means, do you?

Western Culture with rule of law and white nations in general are the Jews biggest enemy. The Warburg financed Kelergi Plan will fix that problem. When all the western countries are like African shit holes with an economy like Zimbabwe the ADL and aIPAC will feel secure.

Long list of shabbos goys hewing the wood and fetching the water for the chosen ones. The Protocols said the Jews would put puppets to lead all the nations. What can be said for a nation that has fought 2 world wars to advance the Zionist cause and has always put Greater Israel as top priority over everything including the lives of our young serving in the Israeli foreign legion (U.S. military).

“Whites” didn’t bring them.

jews did.

And jews control them.

jews give them money and agency to fuck white people.

Blacks are not the problem.

jews are the problem.

‘This is black justice in the raw. Whites were stupid to bring this savage race to the West.’

It’s all in how you handle them. Dogs would pose similar problems if we attempted to treat them as we treat blacks.

As it is, we treat dogs in accord with what they are, and they’re perfectly agreeable and even useful.

Do the same with blacks, and you’ll find them as congenial as Labrador Retrievers.

We don’t hate blacks for who they are; we hate them for so egregiously failing to meet the expectations we impose on them. You could say we hate them for who they aren’t.

Agree on all points.

Many Muslims also want to do the right thing and try to act morally. But, if you examine Muslim religion, you will soon find out it is full of deception mechanisms, similar to Talmud. Muslims are a loaded gun. Why bother with them in your population, when they can go off at anytime?

Any short term benefit to inviting these tribes/cultures into American society (if there even is one) is completely negated by the eventual explosion of the ticking time bomb. It’s inevitable as history shows. There is no sane reason to have these groups in the U.S. from the standpoint it traditional American society. That leaves more nefarious motivations. Deracination is a prime one.

Leave it to the lying Jew Spew Media to decriminalize ALL Black crime and criminalize all White responses to black crime.
A hateful people, full of malice and lies.
Begone Jew.
Go to Israel where we can keep an eye on all of you.
Take your black pets with you.