Jacques Baud is not the only political prisoner in the EUSSR.

Reiner Fuellmich, international lawyer,, jailed since 2023 folowing a kangaroo trial by corrupt judges working for German secret services.
https://gregreese.substack.com/p/leaked-dossier-shows-german-government
Arno Van Kassel, another lawyer, jailed without due process in the Netherlands like Fuellmich. falsely accused of being a ‘terrorist’, the new attribute created by the ‘authorities’ to silence critics and protests as we have seen with Palestine Action in the UK (if you think the UK left the EUSSR, look more closely).

Switzerland is the last free country in Western Europe, that is not under the yoke of the criminals in Brussels But this year the tyrants come back again at the Swiss with alleged ‘treaties’ between the totalitarian bloc and the Helvetian nation.

the goal of the EU, as usual, is to destroy any sovereignty left in all the nations it tries to supersedes.

The problem for the rotten politicians in Bern and the vermin in Brussels is that the Swiss constitution allows Swiss citizens to refuse any law or treaty they disagree with. The Swiss are also famously independent and always rejected the demands of the Brussels mafia.

The biggest party in Switzerland, is already campaigning against any disguised adhesion from Switzerland to the EU tyranny, but they and Swiss people will have to fight against the corrupt politicians in Bern, the corrupt media and a fraction of the population that is as idiotic as it is ignorant who believe that the EU is what their propaganda says it is.

Let’s hope Swiss people are smarter than their neighbors.

Why would you censor or cancel. Asshole.

Above there is a link to sign a petition to end the draconian seizure of his personal funds and denial of all human living rights to Jacques Baud
Another Baud petition, with many more signatures, also easy to sign, is on this page in English here
https://free-baud.org/en/
To repeat the link above to the specific EU petition – don’t be shy of the German words, interface is also in English
https://www.openpetition.eu/petition/online/sofortige-aufhebung-der-sanktionen-gegen-jacques-baud

Another resident of Brussels beleaguered by the EU, is USA-Poland dual citizen and former DOJ employee Leszek Sachs, who won twice in Brussels courts against an EU-Belgian mafia tied to Von der Leyen, this mafia proven in court to be extorting cash bribes for EU health care system access … Belgian police files document a threat to murder this American by an EU-serving Brussels prosecutor, if he doesn’t evacuate from Europe
https://twitter.com/TribunusBru/status/1997022941826199552

Why is this Churchill hagiographer even appearing in UR?

Ron Unz, please tell.

Crowley’s a JTRIG keyboard commando, recipient of the Savile Cross for bumboy services. He’s the critical component of Britain’s army of 38 special forces pedos in Q-Tip hats who faint in the heat or when eight year old boys go by.

The bitches did punish him. The EU left Ritter’s punishment to the US banks. USAA debanked him.

Just another Putintard propagandist, similar to Scott Ritter, supporting the invasion of Ukraine by eurasian Chabad agent Putin & Russia’s liquidation of millions of white Ukrainians. 10 to 1 they’re all crypto-commies. Also notice these various weirdos are all ‘ex military’ or ‘ex intelligence agents’ now playing some phony ‘geopolitical analyst’ role for the altnewstards.

Of course-it’s complex, but the primary reversible factor is greenhouse gas accumulation in the atmosphere. In ANY CASE, it’s too late already, as you’ll soon see.

there’s a lot more to it

Perhaps. Actually, it’s a BIG PERHAPS.

Proof; Q: What is the fastest growing factor?

A: CO2, as the Keeling CO2-curve shows [look to the vast scale of the fossil-carbon industry, shiploads and shiploads in queues from over the horizon]; more = IF we were to reverse the slope of that curve THEN the world would have to stop mining fossil carbon as good as completely. Sadly that will most likely never happen because the rich-beyond-avarice fossil carbon miners just can’t get enough AND we have true idiots running around screeching “Drill, baby, drill!” rgds

Yes I’m aware of all that but there are other factors. Like clearing of forests, the growth of which could absorb CO2. Clearing forests changes the albedo and radiation balance. Changes in land use patterns, increasing artificial radiation due to communications devices, growing urban archipelagoes, etc. there’s a lot more to it.

They take a ‘cursory’ look you denialist poltroon, because the prime role of the Sun in all planetary phenomena, is well established. However, I hate to tell you, you intellectually and morally challenged pygmy, that the Sun is NOT the only factor. Greenhouse gases are vital to keeping the planet habitable for our species. And now they are going to, (as they have done on four major occasions and in some more moderate events), send the global thermostat and planetary climate into chaos, and the mass extinction that results will almost certainly destroy humanity. You are a poisonous (profanity deleted) who arrogantly and laughably thinks himself clever-the Dunning-Krugerite.

You are, perhaps, reticent to acknowledge the truth, that the greatest and most rapid forcing of greenhouse gases in planetary history is about to devastate Life on Earth. The loss of humanity, all it has achieved and all it might have achieved, is more disturbing by far than the prospect of meeting aliens or learning that God is really dead.

More dumbfuckery. Greenhouse gases are the prime cause of the climate destabilisation because the Sun has been pretty constant in radiation over the last few centuries, the Milankovich Cycles are proceeding as expected etc. There are, however, a number of positive feedbacks occurring, exacerbating the warming and destabilisation.
Water vapour, the strongest but most sort-lived greenhouse gas in the atmosphere, is increasing by 7-8% for every one degree Celsius increase. The planetary albedo is the lowest ever measured, probably due to the loss of reflective sea ice and montane glaciers, and reductions in particulate smogs. Global methane levels are rapidly rising, in an ‘end glaciation event’, without a preceding glaciation, probably from warmer, wetter, tropical wet-lands and fugitive emissions from hundreds of thousands of ‘fracking’ wells. Nitrous oxide and novel greenhouse gases are also rising rapidly, aircraft con-trails reflect solar radiation by day, but trap heat in the Earth system by night, and permafrost is melting, leaking CO2 and methane either directly or by digestion of organic material released, by micro-organisms. And it’s way too late to avert a ‘wet hot-house’ mass extinction event, almost certainly including humanity.

True, true. We are going through a warming period, at least in my lifetime, and CO2 and other such IR absorbing gases do cause heating, but there are too many other factors at play to be able to blame this climate change exclusively on the increase of IR absorbing gases. Then there are natural sources of these gases, which in a heating world would be increased. I suppose eliminating anthropogenic sources would be a worthwhile experiment to see if doing so can reverse the global warming.

I’m kind of undecided on the anthropogenic global warming/climate change

I won’t attempt to persuade anybody, but just one search result:

[search input] define: co2-greenhouse effect wiki
AI Overview
The CO2-greenhouse effect refers to the phenomenon where carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere traps heat from the Earth’s surface, leading to a warming effect. This trapping of heat is part of the broader greenhouse effect, which is essential for maintaining a habitable temperature on Earth, but increased CO2 levels can amplify this effect, contributing to climate change ..

and one photo report:

[article text]
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/article/2024/aug/06/it-made-me-cry-photos-taken-15-years-apart-show-melting-swiss-glaciers

[article image]
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/article/2024/aug/06/it-made-me-cry-photos-taken-15-years-apart-show-melting-swiss-glaciers#img-1

There’s lots more evidence; ocean-warming and coral-bleaching, say. rgds

I’m kind of undecided on the anthropogenic global warming/climate change. I certainly think anthropogenic activity can affect climate but to what extent, like to runaway greenhouse effect, I don’t know. So many other anthropogenic factors also contribute, like deforestation, desertification, change in land use patterns, growing urban heat archipalogoes. I don’t even know what having large surfaces covered with solar panels would do to the radiation balance.

Errata:

“Green Agenda” Well, that Western

=

“Green Agenda” That Western

That was easy:

=

Well, that was easy:

what happened to Anglin .., he was extremely pro China, but I suppose had a different viewpoint on global warming

That was easy:

China Has Total Ability to Thwart the Idiotic “Green Agenda” Well, that Western Anti-China Lunatic Are Pushing
Andrew Anglin • August 3, 2023 • 1,600 Words • 190 Comments
I think we all need to take a moment and reflect on the fact that there is a 100% overlap between anti-China fanatics and believers in the global warming hoax who want to use deadly poisonous chemicals to build useless doom machines (and genocide birds and whales). The most hilarious thing about this whole conflict..

You ‘believers’ in the anti-AGW-cult need to prove how the Keeling CO2-curve and observed weather ‘anomalies’ – unprecedented floods for some, droughts for others, massive ice-melting, say – are unrelated. rgds

PS Not so BTW, I am neither Anti-China, a fanatic nor a Lunatic – just an honest observer = not oily/fossil-carbon $-corrupt.

Well, it, Mulga is passionate, something lacking among intellectual debaters.

Wonder what happened to Anglin. He seems to have evaporated. Like Mulga, he was extremely pro China, but I suppose had a different viewpoint on global warming.

So you aren’t sure if it’s a she or a he. So let’s call it, it.

It does, it uses profanity as you realized yourself, gratuitous insults, permanent derogatory terms like ‘deniers’ (which is the tried technique used by climate cultists to “debate” when their fallacious theories are exposed for the scam they are) and propaganda or (delusions maybe if this anonymous character really believes the tons of bullshit it spreads about climate on this site).

“What would TUR be without Mulga? ”

The exact same… The only person missed on TUR is Andrew Anglin, who contrary to the climate cultists, ‘greens’ and brain-dead morons who parrot the establishment propaganda, was funny.

A bit of culture for skrik, mulga and other cult members:

100+ Papers – Sun Drives Climate
https://notrickszone.com/100-papers-sun-drives-climate/

Proven by thousands of temperature datasets, the earth’s climate fluctuated cyclically in the past, and there’s an overwhelming body of evidence showing a close correlation with solar activity and other powerful natural factors. If the IPCC had truly examined past temperature developments and compared them to solar data, they’d have seen there is something remarkable there.

Yet in the IPCC AR5, Working Group 1 takes only a cursory look at solar activity and its possible impacts on climate in IPCC AR5 before simply dismissing the sun altogether. The Earth’s sole supplier of energy, the sun, and all its dynamism, in fact gets only a couple of pages in a 2200-page report, about 0.1%. That alone is a monumental scandal.

What follows is a list of papers I found in just a few hours that the IPCC should have taken a much closer look at instead of just dismissing. The list of course is not complete.

At least Mulga doesn’t use profanity

Oops, she does. She just unleashed some in a recent comment.

At least Mulga doesn’t use profanity. I like her (they) long lists of insults as they make me laugh. What would TUR be without Mulga? Maybe Ron finds her (they) funny too. I can just imagine Mulga beating into a pulp some climate denialist on the street with a placard “CO2 kills”.

Seasons are so … dated. They’re not what they used to be.

how they have been fooled by the climate preachers

Haw.

Posit: That many anon[###] commenters form an anti-AGW/pro-CO2-cult, whose prime-prayer is “Burn ever more fossil-carbon!” I earlier grouped @anon[328], @anon[382] & @anon[463], now add @anon[215], who together seem to form a single anti-AGW sock-puppet entity – a proof = its remarkably consistent themes, methodology & multiple [unsubstantiable?] citations. Since it/they will likely never be convinced/remedied, I plan no further reply to the [identifiable by modus operandi] anon[###] anti-AGW-cult. Ditto for that remarkably similar by presentation anti-Ashkenazi-origin=khazar cult.

Lastly; denier:

a person who denies something

It works both ways:

The anti-AGW/pro-CO2-cult denies soaring-CO2 is bad.

The AGW/anti-CO2 pragmatics deny excess-CO2 can be good. bye

PS Just as in religion, the anti-AGW-cult believes their credo in the absence of substantiable fact; the real-world evidence is that as CO2 goes up, so the weather goes from bad to worse – unprecedented floods for some, droughts for others, massive ice-melting, say.

PPS Q: What drives the anti-AGW-cult? A: Ever more $s for the ultra-fat-cat fossil-carbon industry.

Climate Anxiety–or Climate Realism?
https://www.masterresource.org/climate-anxiety/climate-anxiety-or-climate-realism/

“Climate hypochondriacs deserve to be treated with compassion, much like anyone who suffers from mental illness. They shouldn’t, however, expect everyone else to enable their neuroses.” – Allysia Finley, Wall Street Journal

The futile, wasteful climate crusade has created collateral damage for the cause of the Progressive Left. Their political weapon against ordinary living in a free society has run afoul of ordinary folk, consumer and taxpayer all. And with the government lucre running low or out, and the political forces aligned against them, there is fear, even panic, that their cause is hopeless and unconvincing. “Open for work,” hundreds of climate activists have circled around their names on the business site, LinkedIn.

When the climate movement was at its peak in mid-2022, the faithful knew they were winning political battles but losing the war against carbon dioxide (CO2).…

: “The abuse of TUR by anonymous commenters should be ended. ”

LoL… Is skrik your real name?

I guess not. So you are anonymous too.

Yes yours and abuses should be ended. We agree on this point at least.

The problem is that your alarmist climate theories have been debunked thousand times and serve only the establishment you seem to cherish: bankers, corporations, totalitarian governments, fake NGO’s, globalist syndicates, etc…

All working together for global control.

Your colleague is one really deranged neurotic case and has apparently difficulties to tolerate anything but his own ideologies and maintain a comment without language abuses. This is typical from leftist, particularly the ‘green’ type (green outside, deep red inside).

This is where you get on a lot of people nerves, the systematic insulting terms you use to address others.

Like calling people “deniers”, a very derogatory term which, and it’s funny on TUR, of course relates to ‘Holocaust denier’.

https://saltbushclub.com/2020/02/16/petitions-from-climate-realists

“The term “climate denier” continues to be used by those promoting catastrophic global warming from the trivial emissions of anthropogenic carbon dioxide. It is a derogatory term, first coined by the journalist Ellen Goodman.

The terms “climate denier” and “global warming denier” are deeply offensive. They equate disagreement about science with Holocaust denial, which is obviously the reason “denial” rather than “disagreement” is used. It is nasty and insulting, and no decent scientist, journalist, or anyone else for that matter, should ever use those expressions.

There will always be (and should be) disagreement about various issues in science among scientists but should Einstein have been called a “physics denier” because he rejected the widely held luminiferous ether hypothesis? Should Copernicus have been called an “astronomy denier”?”

For both of you and those who are interested in facts, real science instead of unproven or manipulated climate claims, here are thousands of peer reviewed studies:

1350+ Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skeptic Arguments Against ACC/AGW Alarmism
http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html

100+ Papers – Sun Drives Climate
https://notrickszone.com/100-papers-sun-drives-climate

But since, most climate cultists have deep psychological issues, let’s focus on this:

Psychoanalysis on Climate ‘Denial’? (stranger and stranger)
https://www.masterresource.org/climate-pessimism-mentality/psychoanalysis-climate-denial/

“CO2 is not the threat but the friend, as are fossil fuels that make an unsafe world safe and pleasant for billions of people despite the forces of Statism and … elitist climate policy.”

“Climate alarmists live in a self-righteous bubble where humankind is the scoundrel. Nature is optimal and fragile; anthropogenic change cannot be good, even toward greening, warming, and moistening. Think about that nonpolluting trace gas, carbon dioxide (CO2).

To the “Church of Climate”, there cannot be any debate against the narrative of alarm–or pushback against forced energy transformation. The opposition is evil against the common good, defined so vaguely as to preclude real human betterment. So psychological explanations emerge.”

I won’t waste my time too much on that, most people now understand how they have been fooled by the climate preachers, how their freedom are slashed and how their taxes are used for upward wealth transfer.

“Climate change is when your money goes from your pocket to the government pocket. ”

However, comments and commentators that focus on topics unrelated to the article in question ..

Fact check; from @Peter Haenseler

There are many reasons for this: misguided education policies, a lack of cheap energy from Russia, insane green policies, wrong decisions by large companies, a lack of competence among political leaders

[my bolding] @mulga mumblebrain

How are ‘green policies’ designed to avert a ‘wet hot-house’ mass extinction caused by climate destabilisation, ‘insane’?

That was the start of attacks at both mulga and skrik, who both responded properly.

@anon[382]’s “off-topic” claim is false. I suspect that @anon[328], @anon[382] & @anon[463] {perhaps others} form a single anti-AGW sock-puppet entity. The abuse of TUR by anonymous commenters should be ended.

Instead of adressing the problem: two “commentators” (rather insiders or paid trolls) who, in complete impunity violate all (the few) commenting rules on TUR, including constant insulting and personal attacks, actually monopolizing the actual debate, you challenge the fact that tries to participate in the debate.

Why?

What is the point of allowing comments if only chosen commentators have the right to participate?
What is the goal to suppress all opninions save one?
What is the point then of TUR if only one opinion is allowed then?

The fact is, there is no climate emergency. Humans have a negligeable impact on climate if any, they certainly have one on pollution, but the Sun is the main engine for climate change. And blaming Co2 for ‘global warming’ is absurd junk science at best and really insulting anyone’s intelligence.

To back it up with facts:

https://environmentalprogress.org/big-news/2020/6/29/on-behalf-of-environmentalists-i-apologize-for-the-climate-scare

The issue has always been population control
http://www.globalresearch.ca/misanthropic-bankers-behind-cop26-green-new-deal/5760272

Net Zero Watch warns of growing grid instability
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2025/04/29/net-zero-watch-warns-of-growing-grid-instability

….My comments were censored because I logically suspect both these two commentators as being:

1/ the same person or two accomplices working in tandem to push a political or ideological agenda
2/ Possible paid propagandists
3/ focusing on topics unrelated to the article in question
4/ who substantially indulge in profanities or personal attacks
5/ cluttering up threads with repetitious or completely non-substantive remarks

The narrative they try to impose by repetition of the same mantra….

Be that as it may, why, exactly, are you….ahm….discussing?debating?…with them?
You, obviously, won’t/can’t change their minds. They won’t/can’t change yours. So, why?

To inform other people?
If “other people” haven’t made up their minds so far they won’t, ever, about the thing. Don’t care, can’t think about anything complicated, whatever.

You think you are influencing TPTBs, somehow? Really?!
There IS a narrative and the intent behind it, of course. But that you, me, anyone not among those power players can influence anything onto them is…..naive?

Just curious.

It is quite amazing to see that none of the personal attacks, insults, ad-hominem attacks of , are ever censored, while the UR Masthead is quite clear on this point:

https://www.unz.com/masthead/
“However, comments and commentators that focus on topics unrelated to the article in question (…) who substantially indulge in profanities or personal attacks (…) ,. Individuals should also avoid cluttering up threads with repetitious or completely non-substantive remarks”

The comments by , represent something like 60 to 70% of all comments on this article which has nothing to do with climate.

My comments were censored because I logically suspect both these two commentators as being:

1/ the same person or two accomplices working in tandem to push a political or ideological agenda
2/ Possible paid propagandists
3/ focusing on topics unrelated to the article in question
4/ who substantially indulge in profanities or personal attacks
5/ cluttering up threads with repetitious or completely non-substantive remarks

The narrative they try to impose by repetition of the same mantra: the man made climate change hoax.

Which has been debunked again and again countless times by real science and honest scientists.

I add here some new articles proving this point:

Spain and Portugal Achieve “Net Zero”… Accidently
https://rclutz.com/2025/04/30/spain-and-portugal-achieve-net-zero-accidently

New details are emerging why a large-scale blackout occurred in Spain, which lasted more than 10 hours and hit millions of Spaniards. The statements of the operator of the country’s energy system differ from the original version of EADaily, but point to the same reason — green energy, which failed in a crisis situation.

Nobel Prize winner Dr. John F. Clauser signs the Clintel World Climate Declaration
https://clintel.org

Clauser has publicly distanced himself from climate alarmism and this year he also joined the Board of Directors of the CO­2 Coalition. In the announcement by the CO2 Coalition, Clauser was quoted in the following way:

“The popular narrative about climate change reflects a dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world’s economy and the well-being of billions of people. Misguided climate science has metastasized into massive shock-journalistic pseudoscience. In turn, the pseudoscience has become a scapegoat for a wide variety of other unrelated ills. It has been promoted and extended by similarly misguided business marketing agents, politicians, journalists, government agencies, and environmentalists. In my opinion, there is no real climate crisis. There is, however, a very real problem with providing a decent standard of living to the world’s large population and an associated energy crisis. The latter is being unnecessarily exacerbated by what, in my opinion, is incorrect climate science.”

UN Climate Summit Shackling the Planet to ‘Save’ It
https://thenewamerican.com/print/un-agenda-2030-a-recipe-for-global-socialism

Updates On The Collapse Of The Climate Scam
https://www.manhattancontrarian.com

But I suppose my comment will be “trashed”, not because I violate any rules but because it doesn’t fit the narrative some are trying to push.

Anthropogenic climate destabilisation is one of the greatest causes, and will be the greatest soon (if it is not already)of environmental degradation. Through temperature and humidity changes, affecting plant and animal communities, through oceanic heat-waves, acidification and de-oxygenation afflicting the seas, through the spread of pests and diseases, through floods, deluges, cyclonic storms, mega-fires, droughts and other phenomena, all rapidly worsening, through te loss of sea and montane ice and the melting of permafrost etc ad infinitum. Are you an ignorant idiot or deliberate disinformer, or both? The mock ‘concern’ for the environment is nauseating, too.

Drivel. Ever heard of ‘erosion’, bozo. Clear-fell a temperate forest, or have a mega-fire rage there, or pine beetles kill all the conifers, and various ‘die-backs’ kill the oaks, the ashes, the elms, the horse chestnuts etc and the next time it rains, heavily of course thanks to the derangement of the hydrological cycles, the soil washes away. Erosion ain’t your friend.

The pushback here is far too similar to the pushback from the CoronaPrankists, that rely on unscientific slogans, outright disinformation to gaslight others and finish off with childish ad hominems and disparagements

[my bolding]

Errr, what “CoronaPrankists” would they be, please?

1. Nutters who claimed SARS-CoV-2 did not exist? [Haw!]

2. Relatives of citizens who died [= were killed] by insane medical procedures or being denied know effective out-of-patent medicines?

3. Citizens who resented tyrannical orders of ‘lock-ins’, ‘lock-downs’ or ‘masks everywhere’?

4. Citizens who objected to tyrannical orders to ‘take this untested experimental mRNA’ rubbish or else?

Kindly give reputable substantiation of that whole quote or be accused of blowing smoke [from you know where].

I love it when hypothesis is declared as the truth.
Smells great in the morning.

The pushback here is far too similar to the pushback from the CoronaPrankists, that rely on unscientific slogans, outright disinformation to gaslight others and finish off with childish ad hominems and disparagements.

How much Amazon land gets cleared every year, and is accelerating?
The removal of tropical soil, which is what happens after land clearing is catastrophic, as the soil only lasts as long as the forest canopy lasts. In temperate forests clearcutting last a similar effect, but because there are season changes soil re-creation can occur because for half the year organic matter can collect, other than being fully consumed within a few days like in the tropics.

Ecology is your friend, too.

God, I love BRAINWASHED hard Right cretins. How much of those 140 million years were humans present in? 800,000 years, ie c o.6%. Humans evolved in a stable atmosphere of c. 280 ppm. As ever, the moron asserts that ONLY CO2 levels affect plant health. In fact, plants prefer stable temperatures, and a balanced hydrological regime ie no long, deep or sudden droughts and no increased floods, deluges, hail-storms and cyclonic storms. And no new pests or diseases. If they do occur, unless the changes are slow and steady, plants have no hope of adapting, or evolving, and go extinct.
In the real world that is precisely what is happening. 82% of all tropical coral reefs are currently bleaching, a phenomenon UNKNOWN until the 1970s. If only they could get more magical CO2!
Your 1-9 is a litany of utter bulldust. Some seem complete inventions. In the real world, climate destabilisation is bringing more extreme weather events, such as megafires and unprecedented floods, and the spread of pests like pine beetles etc which decimate plants, biospheres and plant communities. The Amazon was in deep drought last year, for the fifth time in the last ten years, and is gradually turning to savanna. Is that your idea of ‘health’?

10. Is crashing our once comfortable climate back towards the Carboniferous Age, proof arriving via new world records in flooding events and extreme glacier retreat = melting ice, montane and polar.

Then humanity released fossil CO2 from the Carboniferous Age, and CO2 concentrations rose from 280 ppm two hundred years ago to the current 420-430 ppm, the highest level and most rapid rise for millions of years

Yes + sadly, threatening terminally. There’s a side-discussion over at MoA about the Spain/Portugal power-outage; here’s a comment:

The anti-solar and anti-wind energy folks are a lot like the buggy whip people who made arguments against automobiles and the internal-combustion energy. Anti-innovation at heart, and protective of incumbent technologies. Also, in the case of solar and wind energy, many of them just hate it because they still carry a whiff of “hippie-dippy” Jimmy Carter and other silly utopianism from the 1970s. In other words, they still hate solar because of John Denver.
Posted by: Spectator | Apr 28 2025 22:42 utc | 122

Haw. Another post suggested poorly integrated renewables as a possible cause. But IMHO a fatal flaw in electricity generating/distribution is [destructive rip-off + wickedly anti-democratic] privatisations. As you probably know, Austfailia was neoliberalised starting from the wrong side of the aisle by the ‘Sydney spiv in a suit,’ then went bipartisan = even more wickedly anti-democratic. Execution would not be going too far, and ‘medicine for profit’ is a guarantee of ‘profit before/even instead of health’ – GRRR!

To debunk your climate alarmist propaganda, I will give one fact, one every single day. Starting by proving that what you write about Co2 is not only false but totally illogical.

FACT#1

140-MILLION-YEAR TREND OF DANGEROUSLY DECREASING CO2

For the last 140 million years, CO2 levels fell precipitously & steadily to within about 30 ppm of
the 150 ppm “line of death” below which plants can’t survive.

Both the relatively short-term data from ice cores and much longer-term data going back 140 million years (Berner 2001) show an alarming downward trend toward CO2 starvation.

SEE GRAPH. – https://co2coalition.org/facts

CO2 BENEFITS:

Today’s low CO2 concentration is starving trees and plants of the food they need toachieve their full growth potential via photosynthesis. Additional benefits of increasedCO2:

ADDITIONAL BENEFITS OF INCREASED CO2:

1. Increased photosynthesis (“CO2 fertilization”).
2. Plants grow faster, and with less stress and less water.
3. Forests are growing faster.
4. Stimulates growth of beneficial bacteria in both soil and water.
5. More plant growth, means less erosion of topsoil.
6. Bigger crop yields, and more and bigger flowers.
7. Fosters glomalin, a beneficial protein created by root fungi.
8. Less water loss, less irrigation, and more soil moisture.
9. Increase in natural repellents to fight insect predators.

An anonymous omega moron quoting two utterly discredited disinformation sites, and it thinks itself clever. The Dunning-Krugerite in all its horror.

The tons of BS you try to drown your non-audience with, is impressive.

There are more comments and insults from the mulga (paid) clown than article on this page.

And like his colleague krik, citing ‘Wikipedia’, the rigged ‘encyclopedia’ whose owner is a YGL from the WEF, just shows how ignorant you both are.

mulga mumblebrain :

A ‘climate’ would be expert.
A China would be ‘expert’
A world economy would be ‘expert’
An energy would be ‘expert’
A Middle East would be ‘expert’
etc…

But reading your many heinous \comments, what remains is that you are only an insult expert.

You must be really frustrated pal…

Try to see a specialist, to release methane (I know you work hard to save the planet so you hold it),

or to have sex,

it might help.

A film for you, to relax , “brain”:

Video Link

And few sites to have a good one, while learning:

https://wattsupwiththat.com
thegreatclimatecon.com

Yes, Dopey, but water vapour has a sort residence time in the atmosphere, before precipitating out. CO2 remains for many decades. And a one degree Celsius increase in global average temperatures adds 7-8% of water vapour to the atmosphere, thereby worsening the warming. And deranging the hydrological cycle. Go back to chasing cars, old thing-you’re way out of your depth.

Dear cretin-as I said, past CO2 levels are IRRELEVANT to our, H. sapiens, predicament today. In those long ago days, the creatures extant had evolved, over many millennia, to survive in those conditions of ‘immense’ CO2 levels. The Sun, is the main factor in Earth’s climate, but it is NOT the only one.
Our species has evolved in a period of rather stable climatic conditions, albeit with glaciations and interglacials. Those changes forced the migration away from ice-sheets of our ancestors and other hominids, but the changes were over millennia, so we adapted and evolved, and the tropics, the centre of early hominid evolution, were less affected.
Today is quite different. The changes are occurring over decades and centuries, too fast to evolve, and too fast for many to adapt. At a ‘wet-bulb’ temperature (temperature plus humidity) of 30 Celsius, humans die of hyperthermia, if they cannot artificially cool. In your dream world of five or six Celsius increase in global average temperatures, most of the low latitudes will become uninhabitable.
But that’s just the entree’. Our food crops have been bred to thrive in settled climates, with guaranteed water, tolerable temperatures, absence of drought and flood, hail and storms, and all that will be upset by climate destabilisation. Enter mass starvation, as pests and diseases spread, too.
And the killer is the ‘wet hot-house’ mass extinction, as occurred at the End Permian. Then, after massive volcanic ‘flood’ eruptions in what is now Siberia, raised CO2 levels very high, the global temperatures soared, the oceans acidified and de-oxygenised, and 90% of animals went extinct in the so-called ‘Great Dying’. Those changes occurred ten to one hundred times slower than today. THAT is your desideratum, apparently.

Any Rightist omnicidist who thinks that climate science and models do NOT include the Milankovich Cycles, is either extraordinarily STUPID, or lying-or both.

This anonymous cretin and all its lying, misrepresenting, fossil-fuel serving ilk are the deadliest enemies of Life on Earth, ever. Imbecility, pig ignorance, personal psychopathy and brainwashing are NO excuses.

The natural contribution to atmospheric CO2 is a flux, that waxes and wanes according to the seasons and vegetation changes such as leaf fall, and leaf and bud burst, and photosynthesis. For millennia it was balanced, and atmospheric CO2 levels remained stable. Then humanity released fossil CO2 from the Carboniferous Age, and CO2 concentrations rose from 280 ppm two hundred years ago to the current 420-430 ppm, the highest level and most rapid rise for millions of years. This ‘argument’ is a favourite of the DUMBEST DENIALIST CRETINS.

Your:

NATURES CONTRIBUTION TO THE 400PPM IS 97%. (OR 388PPM).
MANKIND’S CONTRIBUTION IS JUST 3% OR 12PPM

[kindly do not SHOUT!] contradicts my [via Wiki]:

The concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere reached 427 ppm (0.0427%) on a molar basis in 2024, representing 3341 gigatonnes of CO2.[1] This is an increase of 50% since the start of the Industrial Revolution, up from 280 ppm during the 10,000 years prior to the mid-18th century.[2][3][4] The increase is due to human activity

Readers may assess the ‘truth-value’ of each quote. Now I’ve put anon[328] on my Commenters to Ignore list. bye

I am really surprised to see that even on TUR, we have few climate extremists who push the propaganda and charlatan pseudo-‘science’ of the mainstream media, sold-out scientists and corrupt politicians.

There is of course no climate emergency, Co2 is a minor greenhouse gas, it is not responsible for rising temperatures or changes in climate, and human beings have a negligible effect on climate, if any.
Climate variations exist, have always existed and will always exist.

What is dangerous however is the extremism sold by corporations, politicians and globalist organizations that is leading to the actual destruction of our planet, fauna and flora and of the human population.

Geoengineering being one the main attack against the planet and our environment but considering also that Co2 levels are dangerously low compared to former period of times in Earth history. There is a ceiling below which Co2 level should never fall as it will mean death for many plants, starting by those we draw our food systems from.

Unfortunately, while many climate alarmists are sincere and believe the lies they have been bombarded with since decades (since birth for the youngest ones), many manipulators use fear and mass psychosis to grab resources, make profits and get more power by using this agenda.

I wish people would realize that the climate agenda is used mainly for that and those who pretend to want our good or the good of the planet are the same usual tyrants who just want more power and money.

&

Friends, as you so kindly asked for information about the ‘man-made climate change’ hoax, I feel
obliged to provide some food for though:

No need to thank me, always a pleasure to share facts with people who are keen to learn.

Enjoy!

Excerpt:

The “mulga/skrik circlejerk” doesn’t give a fig.

Definitely he is stuck up his ass.

Actually it is happening 24/7.
No mention of DEW.

Like I say, get rid of 24/7 Climate Geo-Engineering and let’s study what happens.

Doomscroll less, smile more. Life ain’t so bad.

I thought the Sun was dim enough already in England. But I digress. Did they change the graph, or just present it in a way which made it look flatter? But I digress, again. What I think is going on is that they want us to pray to Ra.

I thought the Sun was dim enough already in England. But I digress. Did they change the graph, or just present it in a way which made it look flatter. But I digress, again. What I think is going on is that they want us to pray to Ra.

It’ll be you problem and you’ll be theirs. I consider it a good division of labor

The idea behind geo-engineering is to raise the planet’s albedo, and thereby reflect more solar radiance, thus energy, into outer space. I’m not going too fast for you, am I Brains? ALAS! Global albedo has fallen to its lowest ever recorded, mostly due to success in East Asia in reducing particulate smogs, and from the loss of reflective ice in the Arctic, Antarctic and montane glaciers. Looks like it ain’t working.

Carlson is a buffoon. Being generous. I suppose you are one of the morons who think that there is only ONE ‘hockey-stick’ of temperature change, boogey-man Mann’s. In fact there are SCORES from other groups, with newer information, particularly paleo-climate proxies like ice-cores, coral-cores, pollen deposits, tree rings etc, etc, and utilised by advanced computer power. And the latest shows temperatures VERY stable for the last five to ten thousand years, then leaping upwards, exponentially, in the last two hundred.
The Medieval ‘Warm’ Period was localised and NOT global, idiot.Ditto the ‘Little Ice Age’, affected, as cool periods are, by a number of large volcanic eruptions.
The crap about CO2 levels and plants is embarrassingly cretinous. Plants do NOT live by CO2 alone. They need equable temperatures, water, and, preferably, climate stability. Too much rapid change, as now, in the climate, and they go extinct. Carlson, as ever, has it arse-up, but he’s performing for his dinner, for an audience of hard Right dullards, like YOU.
There were SEVEN investigations into ‘Climategate’-ALL found it to be BS and exonerated the scientists. You’re onto something re. CoViD 19-no-one can be wrong all the time. And, NO, there is NO ‘pattern’ there. In fact the real pattern is revealed by the way in which the powers that be have IGNORED the true catastrophe of anthropogenic climate destabilisation in order to protect the biggest industry on Earth-fossil fuels. Add that, you nonentity, and you see the real pattern.

Climate Geo-Engineering continues 24/7 and has been since the Vietnam War

The biggest mistake AGW-denialists make is failing to look out their windows. AGW currently manifests as ‘bad weather’ such as extreme flooding or extreme glacier retreat.

Q: Why would any entity deliberately cause such effects? Not so BTW, alleged Geo-Engineering via contrails is truly conspiracy-madness = total BS. rgds

PS My post containing

So AGW-denialists cripple their own [erroneous] case. Seems like losers to me

– is not ad-hom [= Latin, literally ‘to the person’]; it is an opinion based on an observation.

PPS I’ll stick to AGW [anthropogenic global warming] as the bogeyman, since planetary weather is actually a system of heat transport from the tropics towards the poles, increasing CO2 and possibly worse, vastly increasing methane act to trap more heat into the atmosphere, revving up the weather, proof = [looping] extreme rain events causing flooding or extreme glacier retreat = ice melting.

& al

As per chance, an article posted today explains what, why and how the climate charlatans are doing to scare the naive, neurotic, brainwashed and easily manipulated:

Randall Carlson explains the hockey stick trick used to incite fear about global warming
https://expose-news.com/2025/04/24/the-hockey-stick-trick-used-to-incite-fear

Look also at ‘climategate’

““The impact that we are having on the environment … is quite minimal … they’re using the impact of humans on the climate as, now, a political issue more than it is a scientific issue,” he said on the Koncrete podcast in 2021.

“Carbon dioxide (CO2) is necessary for photosynthesis. Below 180 parts per million (“ppm”), there is too little carbon dioxide in the atmosphere for plants to survive. The first plants that will die off are “the stuff we eat,” Carlson said. Currently, atmospheric CO2 is 406 ppm. “If we look at the last 10 or 12,000 years, our baseline is now the lowest carbon dioxide has been in 600 million years,” Carlson said.”

He then explained that, to exaggerate global warming, scientists removed data to create the “hockey stick” temperature graph.”

The Medieval Warm Period, also known as the Medieval Climate Anomaly or Medieval Climate Optimum, refers to a phase of warmer climate conditions that occurred roughly between 950 and 1300 AD, primarily in the North Atlantic region and much of northern and western Europe. It was characterised by warmer and drier conditions globally, with temperatures reaching levels of about 1-2oC warmer than they are now.

AND OF COURSE THEY DIDN’T USE MODERN TECHNOLOGIES THAT PRODUCE CO2…

“Because the Medieval Warming Period didn’t fit their narrative, they erased the Medieval Warming Period, Carlson said. “By the time the 1996 [IPCC] report came out, the whole graph of climate change temperature change from a thousand years ago to now was basically flattened … They got rid of the Medieval Warming Period and the Little Ice Age and … they flattened [the graph] out.”

HOW CONVENIENT…

Carbon dioxide (CO2) is necessary for photosynthesis. Below 180 parts per million (“ppm”), there is too little carbon dioxide in the atmosphere for plants to survive. The first plants that will die off are “the stuff we eat,” Carlson said. Currently, atmospheric CO2 is 406 ppm. “If we look at the last 10 or 12,000 years, our baseline is now the lowest carbon dioxide has been in 600 million years,” Carlson said.

THE FDA ALSO RECENTLY ALLOWED self-amplifying mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (90 percent adverse event rate)

AND THE UK WHICH IS SPRAYING THE SKIES WITH TOXIC MATERIALS SINCE A LONG TIME IS NOW ADMITTING IT WILL SOON SPRAY THE POPULATION WITH SULFUR DIOXIDE AS A ‘GEOENGINEERING METHOD OF ‘DIMMING THE SUN’ (as if they had too much sun there).

Experiments to dim the Sun will be approved within weeks
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/04/22/experiments-to-dim-the-sun-get-green-light/

ANY PATTERN THERE?

And so you ad hominem.

You write just like a Zionist.
Reverse projection.

As long as Climate Geo-Engineering continues 24/7 and has been since the Vietnam War, then I can agree on “Anthopogenic Climate Change” because that is all it is: Anthopogenic Climate Geo-Engineering.

Think I’m full of shit, then let’s eliminate Climate Geo-Engineering.

Decided that I wasn’t changing minds, so took things the punny way. You’re gonna think what you want anyway. Try to have a nice day, it’s beautiful here I’m going outside.

Q:

Many, no doubt, have spawned, yet they work, fanatically, to murder them and all our children. How does one explain that?

A: Money, here specifically $US.

5. In Saudi Arabia, where the oil resources constitute a stupendous source of strategic power, and one of the greatest material prizes in world history, a concession covering this oil is nominally in American control

[my bolding]
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1945v08/d20

Not ‘just’ Saudi Arabia, wherever there is oil and the US can ‘get control’ they grab for it, current latest in Syria, say. Stupendous = extremely impressive = more than enough $US to employ an army of propagandists, who would be assured of being well compensated for any AGW-caused inconvenience [but of course not, if the propagandists put themselves into danger by living in known flood-danger like the lower-levels of Lismore, say].

Backing up a bit, oil was pursued in Iran, say [1/6th to be retained by Iran; recall Austfalia sends 83% of mining revenue o/s] by England/Churchill after their navy converted from coal to oil before WW1, was the ‘impetus’ for the Gallipoli/Anzac imbroglio/disaster [for which Churchill was ‘admonished’] then perfidious Albion/Balfour ‘assisted’ ((their)) path to Nakba#1. rgds

The FACT, you Evil swine, is that these disasters are REAL, no matter how many lies scum like you peddle. You quote vile swill, that you are too evil and stupid to realise is crap, while all the planet’s life-sustaining systems are in collapse or nearing it.
The real enemy is NOT humanity, but malignant scum like you, and the capitalists who profit from destroying life. The type of vermin who put profit before the lives of all our children. Imagine being SO moronic as to equate the flat Earth of centuries past (when many already knew the Earth was a sphere) with climate science TODAY, centuries later.

The denialists are the lowest form of ‘human’ vermin our disreputable species ever produced. Many, no doubt, have spawned, yet they work, fanatically, to murder them and all our children. How does one explain that?

Ignorant or liar? Not mutually exclusive

= AGW-denialists, having no valid argument, go into ad hominem fallacy = “Ignore the facts, strike at the opponent!” So AGW-denialists cripple their own [erroneous] case. Seems like losers to me.

& all the other climate alarmist cult members (I really don’t have time to answer each one of you, it’s a waste of energy and time since you are part of a cult).

Few centuries ago, people like you thought that earth was flat because the establishment of the time told them so.

Read these facts and come back when you have digested with your pathetic denier insults when you have informed yourself.

Look carefully at the graphs which annihilate the claims of your brainmasters:

https://co2coalition.org/facts
naturalclimatechange.org
nzcpr.com/human-induced-climate-change-fraud-of-the-21st-century
http://WWW.CLINTEL.ORG

For your historical culture:

The globalists have been scheming to use environmentalism as an excuse for power centralization since at least 1972, when the Club Of Rome published a treatise titled ‘The Limits To Growth’.

Twenty years later they would publish a book titled ‘The First Global Revolution.’ In that document they specifically recommend using ‘global warming’ as a vehicle:

“In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill”.
The real enemy then is humanity itself.”

Ignorant or liar? Not mutually exclusive, probably both, lol.

What I most ‘admire’ about you fanatic denialist omnicidists is your ineducability. It does not matter, you cretin, what CO2 levels were before human civilization arose. It matters what they were in the last million, and particularly the last two hundred and fifty years. That is when the effect of those gases on human existence is important.
Then the cretin’s favourite imbecility-CO2 is plant food. So it is, up to a certain level, and the rapidity of changes is vital, too. When it increases ten to a hundred or more times faster than in the past, it drives species that have evolved in the lower concentrations, extinct. What’s more, Brains, plants need water, relatively stable temperatures and hydrological equilibrium ie no great deluges and floods or droughts, to prosper too. And those are precisely what your beloved CO2 is disrupting by driving RAPID climate destabilisation.
But, after the moronic, pig ignorant, brainwashing, comes the clincher. You are far more interested in the ‘economy’ ie your own GREED, than the future of Life on Earth. Just another greedy, hate-crazed, moronic, Rightist pos. You’re already in Hell, you MONSTER.

Good work, skrik! It won’t make a difference to the denialist psychopaths, but the fight is worth fighting. ‘There is nothing more dangerous than ignorance in action’. Goethe’s fateful words.

Either you are an ignorant or a liar

Back at you & your AGW-denialist mates. Such language discourages rational discourse.

The main problem here is the ‘western’ economic model = “more, more!” Unless profits are ever-rising, stock-prices are likely fall, and that’s not good for “investors” [better typified as speculators], now including most retirement plans.

Powering the “more, more” is burning ever more fossil carbon, as the ‘best’ [= cheapest, I like to say least-expensive] current option. Here, note that the stupid Greens in Germany killed off their nukular power = least CO2-emitting power production [excepting CO2-neutral renewables].

So the “more, more” is reflected by the Keeling CO2-curve [upward, ever upward, the wild horses held their sway] – but whoops! Our once pleasant climate is now hitting a weather-wall, proof = more often and more powerful flooding, say. As the weather/flooding gets worse our once comfortable life styles are also headed for down the gurgler, quite possibly terminal.

Unfortunately, the ‘business as usual’ profit-motive is supported by the AGW-denialists [countervailing opposition abused as climate scammers, say] so sadly, looks like there’s no turning back so it’s going to be all over now, baby blue – and possibly sooner than anybody might like.

Either you are an ignorant or a liar. There were many periods in earth history when Co2 was way higher than today and most periods, human didn’t even exist, and the vegetation was lush!

Why don’t you show the curve from millions of years ago and now?

BECAUSE IT WOULD DESTROY YOUR BS NARRATIVE.

Co2 is an essential gas for plants and micro-organisms. Have you missed primary school?

The anthropogenic climate scare is a complete scam. Co2 is a minor greenhouse gas and the main reason they target Co2, besides trying to tax us to death, is because Western economies are based on it.

By slashing “CO2 emissions” they destroy what is left of our economies. While filling their pockets.

If you are ignorant, inform yourself. If you are art of the climate scammers, go to hell.

Thank you for the video. As far as I can see in the video, Godfrey Bloom (curiously a gentile, apparently, despite the surname) just does not like the way the banking system works.

I do not know quite what to say about this. Mr. Bloom does not have to like the way the banking system works if he does not want to, but his critique (as expressed in the video) amounts to that central bankers should not be allowed to do their jobs, because—well, because of no particular reason other than that Mr. Bloom does not wish them to do their jobs. Such a critique is not very persuasive to me.

or if in the future they allow the Chinese to run the joint,

Very unlikely IMHO. Its not in the Chinese DNA.

There is a reason that every dynasty rebuilds the walls. Their empire building days ended about 1000AD. Since then they have been essentially inwardly focused.

India had the potential to be a great power, but only if the British had continued its management,

You are right. I think the Indian mind is basically hardwired to work function within a vertical hierarchy. The lower status individual will fawn and and appear to eagerly do the bidding of their superior. But beware, one has to watch them like a hawk. Indians will also skive every chance they get.

My sister does some IT work where she does projects that upgrade systems used by banks etc. One day she asked one of her subcontractors, “there are lots of Filipinos who can do this work, why do you hire all these Indians?” And the reply was “With Filipinos, when you give them a target, and they achieve it, they will push back if you try to increase the target. With Indians, it is different, they will keep taking on more and more work without complaint”.

I think the trick is to learn how to harness the Indian mind/psyche/personality.

India had the potential to be a great power, but only if the British had continued
its management, or if in the future they allow the Chinese to run the joint, and
they dangle a hangman’s noose in every politician’s face.

In a country where corruption and chiseling are high culture, seek outside help
or follow the Judeo- American custom and legalize corruption, including a bonus,
incentives, a fat retirement package and end-of-life pedophilia cruises.

1.

The five most abundant greenhouse gases in Earth’s atmosphere, listed in decreasing order of average global mole fraction, are:[5][6] water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, ozone .. Water vapor causes about half of the greenhouse effect, acting in response to other gases as a climate change feedback

2.

Water vapor is the most important greenhouse gas overall, being responsible for 41–67% of the greenhouse effect,[32][33] but its global concentrations are not directly affected by human activity

[my bolding]

3. Q: Which greenhouse gas is a) mostly attributed to human activity and b) the fastest growing?

A: See the Keeling CO2-curve, say. We know what’s going on; the fat-cat fossil-carbon miners are enriching themselves far beyond avarice, while our once pleasant climate is being driven off a cliff and into the gurgler.

4.

Carbon dioxide levels are now higher than they have been for three million years.[17] If current emission rates continue then global warming will surpass 2.0 °C (3.6 °F) sometime between 2040 and 2070. This is a level which the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) says is “dangerous”

As the odious orange-freak says “KMA”, so too the equally odious @Theophrastus. AGW- as other CO2-as-cause denialists do not bring anything useful to the ‘debate;’ the denialists are literally in denial, serve no useful function and are thus effectively ‘oxygen thieves’. rgds

Yeah and everything is unfortunate, possibly.

I found several websites which are a bit more active and open to debate on the real subjects (which is not the death of Bergoglio the freemasonic Jesuit).

But it is important to know who will be the next puppet they install as “pope” or if Brigitte Macron has one or two testicles…

What about the ongoing genocide in Palestine perpetrated by the Jewnited States, Jewrmany, the Jewnited Rotshcild Kingdom and their israeli handlers?

Oops, censored for non kosher comments!

What a pile of platitudes…

Why would a nuclear power like Russia even take a break on targeting Ukies energy infrastructures while Ukraine keeps attacking Russian ones?

They strangely behave like Hezbollah and Lebanon, letting themselves be bombed and occupied BECAUSE they want to ‘respect’ the BS ‘ceasefire’ pushed on them by the US…

This is the position of the weak, of the loser, not the winner.

And why after 3 years and a half has Russia not liberated all the regions that voted to join them?

And why would any country ask the US permission to have a nuclear program?

Why would Russia help the US to make sure Iran doesn’t develop too much nuclear facilities?

All that don’t make sense, meaning we are sold fantasies while they play their little theater. The joke is on us as usual.

And added to what Putin did last November to Syria, it tells us however who is really in charge from DC to Moscow.

I agree with the title:

everything is possible

Just to refine this discussion, it is a “given” when speaking of ethnic groups,
that there are exceptions which prove the rule. I worked for one Indian
family who went out of their way to be fair and generous. They had moved
from India to Kenya when both were under the British Raj, and after Kenya
became independent in 1963 they went to the U.K. and later to the U.S.

I am not sure you have followed the issue.

Maybe you are correct,

I’m busying living my own life and running my own business,

Whatever had it coming to zog puppet government, or those pathetic peasants who cheered for Zelyn in Ukraine is, a non-issue to me, not even in top 50 of my grocery list

I’ve heard it’s a sabotage job done by Ukies with Brit. intelligence and some Nato assists, that’s as far as I know

I said you might want to rethink your methane habit 🤣,
not anything about environmental degradation.

It’s only anecdotal, but a friend of the family has a car business, and has a nightmare with Indians coming into the showroom, trying to haggle over prices, taking hours to try to wear him down to get something for nothing. It came to the point where he dreads them coming in, because they are the brown Jews of the subcontinent, the opposite of fair dealing. But to ask them to leave is “racist”.

Now the People of the Scam (the Jews), are bringing Indians en masse into the West to be their new cheap and servile managerial class, to replace the troublesome whites, which means that the West can look forward to Indian scams and shoddy work. The advanced society built by whitey out of a sense of the common good will fall apart… IS falling apart, as peoples unable to steward an advanced society – Jews, Indians, Africans etc, loot what they can and let the whole fall into the dirt.

Disgusted to see that Trump is still touting that Indian scam-artist Vivek Ramaswammy for political office, just as fellow scammer Elon Musk, now politically protected, is allowed to continue on with his illegal schemes. At some point the scam:genuine ratio becomes untenable and civilisation falls off a cliff. We’re almost there now. Also pretty disgusted to see that Jeffrey Sachs is touting this ‘India is a superpower’ nonsense. Yes, if sewage-polluted streams, counterfeit qualifications, phone scams and violent gang rape is a superpower, India is right up there. Anyway, the Chinese guy on this site who painted us a vision of Chinese Skynet wiping out the Indians made me laugh, but I also wouldn’t blame the Chinese if they programmed their Skynet robots and drones to scan for European and (((European))) physiognomy in a bid to wipe us out. The (cough) “white man” has become a threat to advanced civilisation everywhere, with his venality, servility to Jews and women, and his disturbing propensity to stuff things up his arsehole, if not his “neo-vagina”. I’m embarrassed as to what the West has become. Maybe death-by-Chinese-drone-swarm is what we deserve for this cuckoldry and ancestor treachery.

Yup,most Indians.

also

Your bias is showing through your observations. Environmental degradation is the most pressing problem. CO2 is a scapegoat. Warming isn’t something to be feared. Education is chock-full of propaganda.

Rule one is, get all the money up front and if any changes to the original job are
made, get that money before starting, also.

Totally agree.

When I was still working, we could apply the standard staged payment contract for clients of any country. That is, we do a certain amount of work, then bill the client for work done.

However with clients from India and the subcontinent, we could not use the standard terms. Either full upfront payment must be made first, or the staged payment must be heavily front loaded. You can safely assume that the payment for the last stage would never arrive.

White liberals in the West are the least racist and ethnocentric people to be found.
Racism has its ugly side, but an ethnocentric preference for one’s own people and
culture preserves our heritage and prevents dissolution and chaos. We can be for
“us” without being overtly against others.

100% agree with that.

Here you go. Here’s what sophomoric wikipedia itself says about Tyndall’s work:

He concluded that water vapour is the strongest absorber of radiant heat in the atmosphere and is the principal gas controlling air temperature. Absorption by the other gases is not negligible but relatively small.

KMA.

You wrote; “What do you expect them to do? Telling the truth and got JFK-ed?”

I am not sure you have followed the issue. The Ukrainian commando has been fully identified. After the bombing, the commando repaired in a Polish port, but in spite of the German requests, the Poles did not release the existing video recordings of the commando. The German prosecutors protested, but the German Government did not. So Germany has accepted that a Ukrainian-Polish commando destroyed the North Stream, a terrorist act of war on a vital infrastructure.