“More telling is de Benoist’s rejection of naturalistic science-based belief systems advocated over the past 150 years by some of our best minds: Monism, German PhD zoologist Ernst Haeckel (1834–1919); Beyondism, British-born PhD psychologist Raymond Cattell (1905–1998); Cosmotheism, American PhD physicist William Pierce (1933–2002).
Ernst Haeckel pushed illustrations of fake fetal development. He was a fraud pushing the fake notion of “evolution” with it’s self-creating universe and elements magically coming to life. Hardly a scientist let alone a “zoologist.”
Science suggests that our earliest ancestors were right the first time, when the venerated the earth, the moon, the sun, for these are indeed the forces that created life and sustain it every second of every day. The problem is of course that they are not conscious entities fixated on the activities of one of the many millions of species that exist here. Christianity is clearly a paganized variant of Judaism, with a very charismatic failed nationalist taking on the characteristics of Apollo – divine son, healer, good shepherd – as his legend evolved in the eastern Roman empire. But Christianity fails as an ethical system. Doing or not doing certain things in order to earn a reward or to escape a punishment is not ethics, but mere self-interest.
I am reminded of Lou Reed’s song “Busload of Faith,” in which he makes the rather Zen point that everything that you put your faith in, whether your friends or your god or your family, will let you down, but faith itself never does. Perhaps it’s one way of bypassing a wiring defect in our brains, as it makes no sense whatever on the face of it.
All Pompeiians with genome-wide data consistently derive their ancestry largely from recent immigrants from the eastern Mediterranean, as has also been seen in contemporaneous ancient genomes from the city of Rome, underscoring the cosmopolitanism of the Roman Empire in this period.
Replies: @Vergissmeinnicht
This suggests that the Roman Empire in both its shorter-lived western part and the longer-lasting eastern centered on Anatolia had a diverse but similar population plausibly drawn, to a substantial extent, from Anatolian pre-Imperial sources. In an irony of history, although the Roman Republic prevailed in its existential military struggle against the Anatolians rallied by Mithridates VI of Pontus during the first century BCE, the final incorporation of Anatolia into the Roman Empire and the increased connectivity that ensued may have set the stage for the very same Anatolians to become the demographic engine of Imperial Rome itself. This recreated, in historical time, the mythical journey of Aeneas and his Trojan exiles from Anatolia to the shores of Italy.
It is like doing DNA analyses on Pharaohs and falling into the trap you’ve unravelled the population genetics of Ancient Egypt.
(Hint: The have-nots were not mummified.)
I have said it before, I’ll repeat it:
I don’t know how blond and blue-eyed was Ancient Rome and Ancient Greece,¹ but…
…To this day, the élites of Italy and Greece are more blond and blue-eyed than the average population.
(Not saying the “average Italian/Greek” didn’t change his make-up within all these centuries: we’ve all heard of the Moors in Italy and the Ottomans in Greece – left an imprint.)
1. Græco-Roman Emperors & politicians, writers & poets, philosophers & mathematicians, Generals & heroes etc. are not representative.
Is this some kind of low IQ American ghost story version of our traditions? You aren't European and are probably partially black, so it is no wonder you are confused, but you do understand reincarnation is real and not a ghost story, yes?
A reoccurring theme within the first and second orders was the resurrection of heroes, palingenesis, and heroic rebirth. Leaders such as King Arthur and Emperor Barbarossa are not dead, but only dormant or sleeping and will awake in a time of crisis to save their people. There were also tales of ghost armies, fallen warriors who rise to fight again. The Reconstruction Klan was imaged as Confederate war dead summoned to save the South.
The Roman elite was Nordic but not the general population.
All Pompeiians with genome-wide data consistently derive their ancestry largely from recent immigrants from the eastern Mediterranean, as has also been seen in contemporaneous ancient genomes from the city of Rome, underscoring the cosmopolitanism of the Roman Empire in this period.
A rich, sensuous offer of life after death, as in the Asian reincarnation religions, is the absolute essential, otherwise any offered religious construct will fall flat. Time for everyone to reject all Abrahamism, and take the happier, no-worries, no-ugly-stuff-required, reincarnation pill ... where there is always hope and always another chance to get back on the road to paradise.
you do understand reincarnation is real and not a ghost story, yes?
10 min video of Bhagavad-Gita story, much nicer and quite horror-free relative to bible/quran
Never was there a time when I did not exist, nor you, nor all these kings; nor in the future shall any of us cease to be
- Krishna to warrior Arjuna, in the Bhagavad-Gita
Doubtful your goofy AI image of big boob blonde has anything to do with reincarnation. Is your karmic merit really that high?
One comes across these low-level but popular notions of reincarnation frequently, however the idea must be understood apart from trendy Theosophical material, but rather within established myth (from which it flows). In any case it has nothing to do with ‘you or me‘ coming back to life. That is, a fully intact ego, ready to pick up where it left off, prior to the dirt nap.
Within the article’s context, and associated with the New Right, we find the names of Rene Guenon and especially Julius Evola. Both have explained the concept from its mythic roots. In fine, what you now ‘are’, that is, all your cumulative experiences comprising a personality, good and bad, are conditioned. And as such, are ephemeral.
Thus, if you are born again it will be in all new social/cultural/economic/family circumstances. And what you will likely become is not going to have any relationship to what you are, today. The exception to this would be something something like Nietzsche’s Eternal Return doctrine.
Also, there is the idea in myth that not everyone returns, but only the ‘elect’.
In any case, within myth, if a soul does make it back, all memory is gone. Compare the cross-cultural Greek myth of the River Lethe with it’s Chinese analog, the goddess Mengpo, overseer of the 10th court of Diyu in the realm of the dead.
So I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but unless one has been really really good in this go-around, and is able to work an angle with Mengpo or Persephone, they probably won’t be able to scam a hot AI cartoon girl in the next.
Alexander Dugin’s The Fourth Political Theory is also mentioned, however Dugin’s support for the fratricidal Russo-Ukrainian War may have lessened his prestige and influence.
Among whom has it ‘lessened’. Can’t be Nouvelle Droite, because earlier you state in your review that the New Right wants to enact a more pro-Russian stance. So it is not exactly clear who it is you think ‘might’ regard Dugin negatively, vis a vis Russia’s war against NATO.
In any case, the only people I’ve read that are generally critical (that is, not over specifics) of Dugin are those more aligned with the ‘status quo’, represented politically and economically by the EU/NATO bloc. And of course the US, which actually sanctioned him, making his books more difficult to purchase. I believe that has been lifted, though.
Is this some kind of low IQ American ghost story version of our traditions? You aren't European and are probably partially black, so it is no wonder you are confused, but you do understand reincarnation is real and not a ghost story, yes?
A reoccurring theme within the first and second orders was the resurrection of heroes, palingenesis, and heroic rebirth. Leaders such as King Arthur and Emperor Barbarossa are not dead, but only dormant or sleeping and will awake in a time of crisis to save their people. There were also tales of ghost armies, fallen warriors who rise to fight again. The Reconstruction Klan was imaged as Confederate war dead summoned to save the South.
The key to replacing Abrahamic religions indeed lies in what you say:
you do understand reincarnation is real and not a ghost story, yes?
A rich, sensuous offer of life after death, as in the Asian reincarnation religions, is the absolute essential, otherwise any offered religious construct will fall flat. Time for everyone to reject all Abrahamism, and take the happier, no-worries, no-ugly-stuff-required, reincarnation pill … where there is always hope and always another chance to get back on the road to paradise.
In practice this means heavy borrowing from the existing Asian traditions of Hinduism, Buddhism and Daoism, the richest of all these sources being ancient India. (Ignore the dysfunctions of modern Indian society – the result of a thousand years of colonial occupations by Islam and then Christians/Westerners – they don’t nullify the ancient truths.)
Never was there a time when I did not exist, nor you, nor all these kings; nor in the future shall any of us cease to be
– Krishna to warrior Arjuna, in the Bhagavad-Gita
10 min video of Bhagavad-Gita story, much nicer and quite horror-free relative to bible/quran
No one can be true in any way to the ancient European, pre-Judeo-Christian belief systems without being a racialist. Very few seem to understand this. For example César Tort and Varg Vikernes do, but from what I read not Benoist.
All ancient European societies were fair-haired and eyed, and only the immigration of mudbloods has so altered the demographics of places like Italy, where every one of the original Roman patrician families tended to have light hair and eyes; where those who do not read Latin or Greek think they were dark and looked like modern Sicilians. The European phenotype is the Nordic race, that’s it, and the less one resembles it the less racially European they are.
Though Benoist is excellent in understanding the importance of the ancient philosophies and how Christianity was a Jewish weapon of war used to destroy the Roman Empire and its European values and traditions, he fails to understand those philosophies in these important ways. One of the primary purposes of the ancient cults was as fertility cults. And one only has to read the Norse-Gaelic Rigsmál to understand what the intentions of these were: the dark-skinned man was the first made and named Þræll (Thrall), and the creation of the lighter-skinned Karl led to a superior breed still; yet it is the fairest of them all who was the Jarl and born to rule.
A reoccurring theme within the first and second orders was the resurrection of heroes, palingenesis, and heroic rebirth. Leaders such as King Arthur and Emperor Barbarossa are not dead, but only dormant or sleeping and will awake in a time of crisis to save their people. There were also tales of ghost armies, fallen warriors who rise to fight again. The Reconstruction Klan was imaged as Confederate war dead summoned to save the South.
Is this some kind of low IQ American ghost story version of our traditions? You aren’t European and are probably partially black, so it is no wonder you are confused, but you do understand reincarnation is real and not a ghost story, yes?
Whether or not you want to consider it in terms of the racial soul’s memory in a secular or pantheistic way does not matter too much, although how children would pass the tests to prove their being of an ancestor remains a problem for these people, who as far as I know are ignorant of this Neanderthal tradition’s survival in Asian cults (e.g within Buddhism) where such past-life tests are ongoing today.
“Arthur” simply means bear—read what Marie Cachet has to write about the Neanderthal bear cult and rites of rebirth, and what she has said of the Egyptian Book of the Dead (Egyptians were another blonde-haired and blue-eyed people at least in the ruling class, as the mummies show; overwhelmed by Africans)—and it’s not a stupid American ghost story about half-whites coming to save your southern blacks or whatever you seem to think, but a story of reincarnation because the same king can live and be reborn forever.
In fact this idea should not even be surprising given modern scientific developments, most of which the average person has not kept up to date on whatsoever; if consciousness is fundamental as they point toward it being, as also the new Idealists argue, or as various scientists like Donald Hoffman are trying to prove, then henotheism is correct and there is only one consciousness; hence it is unsurprising to find it walks-in-shapes via metempsychosis.
A rich, sensuous offer of life after death, as in the Asian reincarnation religions, is the absolute essential, otherwise any offered religious construct will fall flat. Time for everyone to reject all Abrahamism, and take the happier, no-worries, no-ugly-stuff-required, reincarnation pill ... where there is always hope and always another chance to get back on the road to paradise.
you do understand reincarnation is real and not a ghost story, yes?
10 min video of Bhagavad-Gita story, much nicer and quite horror-free relative to bible/quran
Never was there a time when I did not exist, nor you, nor all these kings; nor in the future shall any of us cease to be
- Krishna to warrior Arjuna, in the Bhagavad-Gita
All Pompeiians with genome-wide data consistently derive their ancestry largely from recent immigrants from the eastern Mediterranean, as has also been seen in contemporaneous ancient genomes from the city of Rome, underscoring the cosmopolitanism of the Roman Empire in this period.
Replies: @Vergissmeinnicht
This suggests that the Roman Empire in both its shorter-lived western part and the longer-lasting eastern centered on Anatolia had a diverse but similar population plausibly drawn, to a substantial extent, from Anatolian pre-Imperial sources. In an irony of history, although the Roman Republic prevailed in its existential military struggle against the Anatolians rallied by Mithridates VI of Pontus during the first century BCE, the final incorporation of Anatolia into the Roman Empire and the increased connectivity that ensued may have set the stage for the very same Anatolians to become the demographic engine of Imperial Rome itself. This recreated, in historical time, the mythical journey of Aeneas and his Trojan exiles from Anatolia to the shores of Italy.
de Benoist’s conversion to anti-racism…accepts the right of Afro-Asian migrants already settled in Europe to…have a presence in the public space
Lol
Don’t know much about these various pseudo-intellectual weirdos/crypto-commies like de Benoist or Dugin they push on us, but when you see a photo of de Benoist then you’ll understand why it promotes or believes in ‘anti-racism’.. 5 will get you 50 its a Jew pretending to be a ‘white man’.
I have much better lyrics to offer,
i don’t know eustace (not), i think my lyrics beautifully capture the (in)glorious history of our fascist reich, take this line here:
we just reused, our iraq lies,
and r2p as reasons why,
gaddafi then got saddamize,
we came, we saw, and then he died.
how could it possibly be put more beautifully than this? painting such a complete picture, with such an efficiency of words, i can practically hear the witch cackling in the back ground, while poor old col. gaddafi got the saddam treatment. this is kind of like a haiku, blended seamlessly with a rousing national socialist march, and they said it couldn’t be done!
now as to your effort, let me just suggest that “settlers” be changed to occupiers, invaders, squatters, etc., as settlers is a euphemism, used by the msm to avoid calling a spade a spade.
I have much better lyrics to offer, lyrics that could actually be used in pro-Palestinian rallies throughout the Anglosphere:
🌿 Our AK’s warm, retreating through the rubble,
Our only food, desire to free our land.
We’ll soon return, for Occupiers trouble:
Merkavas burn when Gazans take a stand.
🌿 What need for fear when we must face starvation?
And where to run, the desert or the sea?
The Settlers’ claim that we are not a nation
Receives disdain from nations that are free.
i don't know eustace (not), i think my lyrics beautifully capture the (in)glorious history of our fascist reich, take this line here:
I have much better lyrics to offer,
how could it possibly be put more beautifully than this? painting such a complete picture, with such an efficiency of words, i can practically hear the witch cackling in the back ground, while poor old col. gaddafi got the saddam treatment. this is kind of like a haiku, blended seamlessly with a rousing national socialist march, and they said it couldn't be done!
we just reused, our iraq lies,
and r2p as reasons why,
gaddafi then got saddamize,
we came, we saw, and then he died.
Quite a rousing song. Beats rap and related noise any day.
this is inspiring, it makes me want to write an anthem for my country, the zioneocon empire, i’ll glorify the early days and pay homage to the founders and visionaries, that have so transformed our nation.
george bush lied and millions died,
but this rebuilt, our sense of pride.
aligned us with, our pnac tribe,
we pulled the wool, over your eyes.
we also pulled wtc7,
to finish off our 9/11.
obama lied, and millions died,
and he received, the nobel prize.
we just reused, our iraq lies,
and r2p as reasons why,
gaddafi then got saddamize,
we came, we saw, and then he died.
trump lied…..
Remember that after his imprisonment, Hitler was intent on acquiring power legally — so he devoted his time to growing and organizing the NSDAP — he demanded a certain discipline from party members and organizations affiliated with the party, including the Sturmabteilung.
I don’t know about the particular history of the SA in Berlin, but in this passage the author conveys the impression (whether intentionally or not) that SA members fought for the sake of fighting — but I don’t think this was generally true — he later says the SA ‘marched through the streets with the aim of impressing curious sympathizers’, adding ‘as well as provoking political adversaries’ — recall in the Trump campaign of 2016, it did not take much ‘provoking’ for antifa and people of that ilk to instigate violence by attacking Trump rallies and Trump supporters.
It was the same for the NSDAP back in Weimar Germany — in an earlier comment, I noted how even German language Wikipedia admits the SA was formed as a defensive organization — initially their job was to defend NSDAP rallies and political events from frequent violent attacks by the Left — there was no mass media, so Hitler relied on rallies and speeches to appeal to voters, and he wanted these events to be safe in order to attract more people, including the middle class (Bürgertum), women, families, etc.
excellent, enlightening essay.
HW may have been fortunate in his 1930 martydom at the hands of communist gunsels. Had he survived awhile longer and risen further in the Sturmabteilung hierarchy, he might have been among the hundreds of SA leaders and followers killed by Hitler/Himmler/Heydrich during the blood purge of the Nazi Left, a.k.a Night of the Long Knives, 30 June – 2 July 1934, @
Fun fact:
Horst Wessel Lied played at 2x speed turns into iconic Soviet song. I discovered it while watching Soviet Military Parade on TV in mid-80’s while stationed in Germany.
Soviet Air Force Song – “Авиамарш” (“March of Aviators”)
Horst Wessel Lied
I’m going to assume you’re not a Christian, and probably an atheist.
Likely that atheism is heightened by genetic devolution. Its loud proponents tend to be mildly intelligent, but not very much so. Its usually brought about by a lack of a sense for proper limits (wanting to have sex with goats and sheep, forex), or a lack of imagination (if I were God, I would not do things this way), well, dude, you’re not a superintelligence so to put it plainly, you’re not tall enough for this ride, or a lack of a proper father (more emotional issues). No, its not generally a result of deep logic, as deep logic quickly leads one to the inevitable necessity of God.
Therefore, since God exists, and the best information strongly leans toward God being Jesus Christ, we must, if we are at all intelligent, consider His opinion. Keep in mind that He is the Judge of the Dead and the Living. And He loves children.
Use your brain, for crying out loud.
Well, parents (!) of such children are depressed and burdened. See:"The quality of life of parents of children with down syndrome in a tertiary care hospital"
Has the author ever met a person with Down Syndrome?
The fool hath said in his heart, there is no God.
I think this means ‘spiritually retarded’ rather like colorblindness or Down’s Syndrome. Since you’re retarded, we should save ourselves the burden of you on our society, and just send Dr. Kevorkian around for a visit, eh?
Sounds stupid, eh? Now imagine how you sound.
Well, parents (!) of such children are depressed and burdened. See:"The quality of life of parents of children with down syndrome in a tertiary care hospital"
Has the author ever met a person with Down Syndrome?
Slippery eugenics slope.
First, they came for the watermelon babies, and I did not speak up…
Then, they came for the retards…..etc.
Well, parents (!) of such children are depressed and burdened. See:"The quality of life of parents of children with down syndrome in a tertiary care hospital"
Has the author ever met a person with Down Syndrome?
Take your midwit edgelord faggotry back to reddit.
What is happening in the West is a deliberate eradication of everything before, all the those who claimed to have suffered under the old system have clubbed together to destroy the society of men.
Freaks, Feminists the crazy the criminal have joined forces as well as anti-christian forces who provide the funds…all hate the Western male created society, they are piling insult after insult, they will continue the attacks until men are wiped out or neutered and kept as house pets.
These degenerates believe that lies are ok to achieve their goal, they believe thieving elections are all good and well to achieve their goal of eradicating men.
But what about children? That’s why the project had to wait until fertility treatment made the male replaceable, male children will be feminized, hence the sexual degenerate teachings at schools, if this doesn’t work then these boys will be euthanized.
It has been identified that men are a danger to earths future so they have to be pacified or removed.
Men…you have been marked for termination!
There is no God.
.
.
.
Has the author ever met a person with Down Syndrome?
Well, parents (!) of such children are depressed and burdened. See:
“The quality of life of parents of children with down syndrome in a tertiary care hospital”
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2049080122011888
“Quality of life of parents with Down syndrome children”
https://doaj.org/article/9d420d74ac1d450c9a78bfb6ac9f9157
“Parental Stress, Familial Burden and Quality of Life in Parents of Children with Down Syndrome”
https://iprpk.com/ojs/index.php/jpap/article/view/151
Is it the duty of civilization to provide safety-padded living spaces for retards? Is it really reasonable to expect a decent couple to provide for an objectively worthless retard who has a 0% chance of achieving autonomy at any point in their life? What about the other kids? Is it fair to the siblings of a retard to expect their lives to revolve around the drooling, farting animal their family was cursed with? Do you actually know how much of a drain on humanity retards are? There are millions upon millions of niggers with approximately retard-level intelligence in USA, who themselves inflict a net-negative effect on civilization. We should be encouraging contraception among these groups and, God willing, abortion of fetuses that can be accurately identified neurologically deformed or retarded.
There has been no cultural evolution and never will be. See our brief summary of Innocent III’s incisive book on real people in undisguised self-assertion, proving that there has been no essential change culturally in the last 1,000 years:
https://www.academia.edu/37832738/Innocent_III_On_the_Human_Condition_Precis_by_RS_
Fine-tuning the hurtling mass of human willfulness through biological means is an absurd hope, just as hopeless as the cultural reforms proposed by geniuses past and present, a typical case being seen in Nobel laureate V.S. Naipaul (1932-2018), who gave it a go in high literary form (fiction and nonfiction) across the world for almost half a century:
Indeed, the Kingdom of God is not and cannot be in or of this world, as definitively taught by Jehoshua himself, according to our illustrated review of a classic study, by a German-American, of what actually happened in Nazareth 2,000 years ago:
https://www.academia.edu/50785276/Critical_Analysis_of_Hartmanns_Life_of_Jehoshua
Note that to view the articles, simply SCROLL DOWN; no sign-in is necessary. Thanks.
As for “Christian Zionism,” it was and is based on a phony English annotation-translation of scripture called the Scofield Bible, long ago exposed as a fraud, devised by the Tribe’s cleverest scribes to entrap saps like Speaker Johnson into believing that Christian salvation somehow depends on the triumph of the Tribe in Palestine. How convenient!
I understand that God sustains life through Christ and nothing spiritual or material cannot live without Him for it is written Hebrews 1:3
“Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;”
No technology can give man eternal life. but they will try for in the book of Daniel it is written
Daniel 2:43
“And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay.”
Trans-humanism is such a concept , but will fail and will bring a lot of suffering to human race.
Jesus said John 18:36
“Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.”
Yes, thanks. Since I posted that comment I did some research and looked at how Christians might approach the issue. At some point there seems to be an agreement that medical technology which extends or prolongs life too much crosses a threshold and becomes “tampering with God’s creation”, which is considered bad. But where to draw that line seems to be subjective unfortunately.
I particularly noticed that a desire for eternal life on earth, using technology, was considered dangerous or threatening. I was curious why that was, but then I realized this particular Christian was arguing from the standpoint of spreading faith in Jesus Christ as the savior and the way to eternal life. So basically, if people believe they can gain immortality in the flesh through the works of man, then they won’t believe they have to turn to God for eternal salvation.
Therefore too much medical technology would probably negatively impact Christianity in terms of growth and sustainment of true believers, and to some degree I’m sure it already has. I can appreciate the logic of wanting to monopolize the way to eternal life. But even if the same number of people, or even more, get baptized and go to church regularly, how many of them today actually believe they will live eternally while their friends or family members who haven’t accepted Jesus are going suffer eternally in hell, or just remain dead in their graves forever? My feeling is maybe some portion really believes that, but certainly not all.
There is an effort , you can call it experimentation performed on mankind to change us into something other than we were created to be. I see an effort to make us just a flesh without any spiritual understanding, just people with animal instincts. The worst thing about it is those traitors of its own kind who are selling their souls for unjust mammon. These days people are proud to be fornicators, blasphemers, homosexuals, satanists and on. The only hope is in Christ The Son of God.
I see life as a gift from our Creator , so someone who shortens life is interfering in eternal plan of God, for it is written Genesis 1:28
“And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply,
Now we live in the unnatural state where death reins,
Hebrews 9:27
“And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:”
so we have appointed time of death and it might not work for the better outcome for us.
I’ve noticed that many religious people imply that using technology to save life is not playing God, only choosing to end a life is playing God. Can you explain the logic behind that? Because the logical conclusion of that way of thinking is that we could extend our lives indefinitely using technology, and we’re still not “playing God”.
“Pre-natal screenings can detect congenital defects, yet in some US states it is illegal to abort a Down syndrome pregnancy.”
Has the author ever met a person with Down Syndrome? They are some of the kindest, most loving people one could ever hope to meet.
Is the author really so confident, as to presume to play God, and end such a life?
Well, parents (!) of such children are depressed and burdened. See:"The quality of life of parents of children with down syndrome in a tertiary care hospital"
Has the author ever met a person with Down Syndrome?
A testament to the fact that government isn’t benevolent. It cannot be due to its use of violence to ensure conformance. Although important to document anti-white aggression, organizations like the NA are analogous to trying fell a giant sequoia with a hedgeclipper. Not gonna happen. The entire edifice of government needs to be dismantled into smaller & smaller entities until it’s practically impotent. When there’s 8 billion Sovereigns, people will group together however they decide, then your white enclave can be had.
The poor guy sounds like a real unsung hero. Unbelievable how Whites, especially males, are villified.
I estimate Dugin might be running one of the cheaper information operations on planet earth right now. It ain’t like he flies to Paris and London and New York to be hosted by the jet set. Really doubt he is splurging on high fashion pussy.
Dugin is interested in the Q Anon movement “which couched its criticism of liberalism, Democrats and the globalists in the form of conspiracy theories.”
Now this is complete rubbish.
Is there anybody but A. Dugin who could write a politics pamphlet and go into nominalism? It makes more sense than Beelzebub’s Tales to his Grandson. That might be about the only thing it makes more sense than.
there remain congruent interests between Russian and the West.
Yes, Russia could be easily integrated in the West, if we wanted. In fact, this seems to be what P. wanted. But our establishment needed an enemy and for some groups, Russia was the ideal enemy. As I said, Russia could be a part of the West, the population is not very large, specially if you consider the large territory, the language is a Slavic language like in East Europe, the main religion is a Christian religion, there are historical connections. People who come from there integrate here easily after some time. Russia has all kinds of ressources that we could need. Russia extended historically Europe until the Pacific Ocean, across the whole north part of Asia. Without Russia Asia would beginn in the Ural or even nearer us. Because of that we should have an interest in having good relations with the country and shouldn’t have any interest in weakening them.
But what is happening is exactly the opposite of that. The reason for this development is because our foreign policy, which we should call our Russia politicy, is dominated by militarists for whom only military supremacy counts. They talk about white supremacism, but they themselves practice military supremacy. That’s their approach. Russian attempts to change that failed, it doesn’t matter whether they came from Gorbatchov, Yeltzin or Putin. Minsk was their last attempt.
I think it’s a mistake to see the war in the Ukraine as motivated by ideological questions. The real question that separates Russia and the West is a political question: we use wars as a political accomplishment. The war begun because P had no way to solve peacefully the question of Dombass. We decided that to get the Ukraine we should get the whole Ukraine, including the Dombass and the Krim. That’s what the war is about.
He sounds moderately interesting:
But.
And it’s a Big But.
Who is paying for him? Who is bankrolling him? And don’t tell me colleges. They don’t bankroll nobody but administrators. Until I know who the moneyman is, I reserve judgment.
Now this is complete rubbish.Is there anybody but A. Dugin who could write a politics pamphlet and go into nominalism? It makes more sense than Beelzebub's Tales to his Grandson. That might be about the only thing it makes more sense than.
Dugin is interested in the Q Anon movement “which couched its criticism of liberalism, Democrats and the globalists in the form of conspiracy theories.”
No need to read any particular book by Dugin— he has said everything and nothing in his long career as a long-winded ideologist.
Dugin has never realized that his geopolitics (mostly lifted from Mackinder) are actually third-hand, since Mackinder cribbed from a real genius (Hegel, d. 1831) without acknowledgement (at the time he flourished the murderous Brits were anti-German, unlike two centuries earlier).
Dugin’s writings since the immolation of his daughter in 2022 at the hands of ukrainian terrorists have mostly been a variegated expression of political hysteria. His one focused thought was early this year (at Geopolitika.Ru), if we recall correctly, when he advocated return to Czardom.
Why would Dugin want hereditary monarchy in Russia? To end the constant struggle for power that parliamentary democracy represents and cannot escape! Dugin would have reached this pinnacle of political insight had he actually read Hegel with diligence.
As for the current NATO proxy-war against Russia, please see the following historical analysis:
https://www.academia.edu/76372363/To_Sevastopol_With_Love
Note that to read the article, simply SCROLL DOWN; no sign-in is necessary. Thanks.
Russia = ZOG
Ukraine = ZOG
NATO = ZOG
All on the same Jew -Talmud team setting up white gentiles to be slaughtered in their staged Orwellian war. ..now you know.
you sell vvp well short, by comparing his world view to this cartoon character, who thinks trump isn’t a globalist. idiots like this just feed the nafo trolls, that claim putin wants to resurrect lenin from the dead and reassemble the cccp. the only thing dugin gets right is the title, guess you can’t judge a book by it’s cover.
Why america FAILED by Morris Berman
You just made my day. Good work by the pigs this time. Do that ten million more times — when legally justified and allowed only, I.e. To violent criminals using non-defensive potentially-deadly force — and we’ll be on our way back to a safe, civilized society.
There are apparently many thousands of encounters in the USA every year where this would be legally and morally justified.
Majoring in more-objective fields like STEM is a good idea for those qualified for and well-suited to those fields. That’s not most people or most white people in the USA.
Here’s another idea: help your kids or grandkids leave the USA.
If this video does not convince you that we need more women in high places as leaders to make the hard, rational, and concrete decisons, then I fear nothing will. “A wise Latina would be better, still”.
Heartwarming!
From Steve Sailer’s blog on this website.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/skeptic-research-center/
It’ll lead to this, or maybe they’ll work in unison:
Consciousness #1.
Don’t become police officers in blue areas.
Why risk your life to protect blue city scum from blacks when they chant BLM and accuse you of ‘racism’?
The one reason that makes jews so successful is that they formulate and enact laws (civil-rights for some) that deny us whites the right to look after our own self-interest while they flout these same laws that are imposed on the rest of us. THAT, my friends is a reason for their”success”.
A good example of jewish flouting of “civil-rights” laws is the jewish community of Kiryas Joel, New York, among others. If you are not jewish, you cannot buy property there, nor can you send your non-jewish children to the (jews-only) “public” schools.
Not only that, but most of the jews who occupy Kiryas Joel and other “jews only” communities also take advantage of “social services” and “welfare” programs out of proportion to their numbers. Almost every jew is running some kind of “scam” on the American “social welfare system”.
You see, “multiculturalism and diversity for thee, but not for me” is the jewish mantra and is the primary way that they destroy cultures and civilizations. Their lack of morality figures heavily into their success. Jews think nothing of screwing over a “goy”; it is just “normal business” for them…
Jews are the only group that lacks a moral component. Jews are very amoral, think nothing of screwing a “goy” out of money, possessions, or even reputation or life. You see, the jewish talmud elevates the jew above all others, “goyim” being “livestock with souls, created only to serve the jew”.
This amorality is a critical component in jewish life and is partially responsible for jewish successes. When one does not possess a moral compass that defines and separates “right from wrong” THAT in itself gives the jew greater latitude to “get what he wants” as there are “no limits” on what a jew may do to gain the advantage in just about any situation. The lack of a moral component within jewish life is a major reason for jewish supremacy in civilized societies.
It’s not “smarts” or “IQ” that gives jews an advantage over gentile whites, but is their rabid insistence on cultural and social cohesiveness, unbridled insularity and nepotism (but only for themselves) that gives them an “advantage”.
This same cultural and social cohesiveness that is prized so highly by jewish interests is denied to gentile whites. Jews, to a man will fight to deny this same cultural and social cohesiveness to gentile whites that they themselves enjoy as it is a major part of the jewish purpose–the destruction of gentile white culture, which IS superior to any jewish cultural or social society. If jews did not possess this power, they would most likely be rag merchants, liquor merchants, or furniture merchants–nothing more.
As I have previously stated, jewish success is based on cultural and social cohesiveness and insularity–NOT “smarts” or “IQ”. Once enough jews get into a position of power in the work world or education systems, they will hire and promote their own, even bypassing more qualified gentile white candidates.
Jews have latched on to cultural cohesiveness and nepotism, as it serves their purpose exceedingly well.
At the same time, jews pushed the concept of racial “equality”, (but only for gentile whites), backing it up with “civil-rights” and “equal accommodation” laws which are enforced by governments–but only against whites. These “civil-rights” laws are used as a “battering ram” against gentile whites to diffuse and fragment any semblance of gentile white solidarity and cohesiveness that may arise. Those of us whites who came of age during the so-called “civil-rights” era had a saying” “Behind every negro, there is a jew”, as most of the civil-rights “handlers” were New York-based leftist communist jews.
A great reckoning dealing with the jews is coming. As gentile whites become more marginalized, the accusation of being tagged as “racist” or a “holocaust denier” is rapidly losing its “sting”.
Increasingly, jews are more wary of being “called out” and recognized as “jews”. One can call a jew a shyster, shylock, bankster, criminal or ne-er-do-well, and it will roll off his back like water off a duck, BUT call a jew a “jew”, and he will recoil in horror, having been “found out”.
This will continue until Whites make it stop.
It’s probably more likely civic nationalism failing in Russia than the US
Anyone who denies the U.S is a socialist shit-hole, needs to be euthanased.Replies: @Michael Korn
Anyone who says that the USA is ‘socialist’ needs immediate psychological intervention.
To TV and GH:
https://www.unz.com/runz/vaxxing-deaths-or-covid-deaths/#comment-5742579
https://www.unz.com/runz/vaxxing-deaths-or-covid-deaths/#comment-5742708Regarding your best bud Putin, I used to be a huge Putin fan. I’ve enjoyed watching videos of him conducting four hour unscripted national press conferences and am very impressed with his intelligence and articulate nature. However, I keep thinking of the video I saw of him about ten years ago where he was asked about 9/11 Truth. He laughed it off and said that it would be impossible to orchestrate a conspiracy of such vast numbers of actors and participants.
Now I take your point that Putin and other foreign leaders do not have to promote 9/11 Truth. That is our responsibility as Americans (one we have failed at utterly). However I’ve seen evidence that Putin goes out of his way to validate the official DC 9/11 narrative, and that is unforgivable in my book. I conclude that Putin is controlled opposition, the bad guy in a batman movie, but working for the same producer and director. Putin seeks a seat at the NWO table like all the European sellouts. That’s it. He offers no hope for any of us because he is a selfish egotist just like all the others.
Anyone who says that the USA is ‘socialist’ needs immediate psychological intervention.
Anyone who denies the U.S is a socialist shit-hole, needs to be euthanased.
To TV and GH:
https://www.unz.com/runz/vaxxing-deaths-or-covid-deaths/#comment-5742579
https://www.unz.com/runz/vaxxing-deaths-or-covid-deaths/#comment-5742708Regarding your best bud Putin, I used to be a huge Putin fan. I’ve enjoyed watching videos of him conducting four hour unscripted national press conferences and am very impressed with his intelligence and articulate nature. However, I keep thinking of the video I saw of him about ten years ago where he was asked about 9/11 Truth. He laughed it off and said that it would be impossible to orchestrate a conspiracy of such vast numbers of actors and participants.Now I take your point that Putin and other foreign leaders do not have to promote 9/11 Truth. That is our responsibility as Americans (one we have failed at utterly). However I’ve seen evidence that Putin goes out of his way to validate the official DC 9/11 narrative, and that is unforgivable in my book. I conclude that Putin is controlled opposition, the bad guy in a batman movie, but working for the same producer and director. Putin seeks a seat at the NWO table like all the European sellouts. That’s it. He offers no hope for any of us because he is a selfish egotist just like all the others.
Or as a former Austfailian Government Minister observed, ‘Two Wongs don’t make a White’. ‘Jocularly’, of course.
The solution is simple enough. If you have your heart set on getting a degree majoring in Sociology of Psychology or other humanities discipline, the government (ie: the Taxpayer) should not offer a student loan to subsidise your education.
Bottom Line: I like to read history but, in the event that I decide to make a career out of it, it should be done on my own dime.
I also believe there is much to be gained from REAL economics (ie: as taught by the Austrian Economic School of thought, as utilised by the likes of Dr Ron Paul and the preeminent financial forecaster in the world Peter Schiff).
Austrian Economics has been almost invariably right in predicting recessions in advance and explaining WHY said recessions came about in the first place (courtesy of the Austrian Business Cycle Theory) - as opposed to the Keynesian nonsense that is taught in most Economics faculties in the western world.
That said, we have FAR TOO MANY GRADUATES being produced in these humanities/liberal arts disciplines and this is ENABLED by Government funding of their education through student loans - which will never be paid back by most of these graduates as they have no marketable skills upon graduation.
Anyone who says that the USA is ‘socialist’ needs immediate psychological intervention. Just sayin’.
Anyone who denies the U.S is a socialist shit-hole, needs to be euthanased.Replies: @Michael Korn
Anyone who says that the USA is ‘socialist’ needs immediate psychological intervention.
The solution is simple enough. If you have your heart set on getting a degree majoring in Sociology of Psychology or other humanities discipline, the government (ie: the Taxpayer) should not offer a student loan to subsidise your education.
Bottom Line: I like to read history but, in the event that I decide to make a career out of it, it should be done on my own dime.
I also believe there is much to be gained from REAL economics (ie: as taught by the Austrian Economic School of thought, as utilised by the likes of Dr Ron Paul and the preeminent financial forecaster in the world Peter Schiff).
Austrian Economics has been almost invariably right in predicting recessions in advance and explaining WHY said recessions came about in the first place (courtesy of the Austrian Business Cycle Theory) - as opposed to the Keynesian nonsense that is taught in most Economics faculties in the western world.
That said, we have FAR TOO MANY GRADUATES being produced in these humanities/liberal arts disciplines and this is ENABLED by Government funding of their education through student loans - which will never be paid back by most of these graduates as they have no marketable skills upon graduation.
No one is denying that there a place for the humanities, social sciences, liberal arts degrees etc, but what Roatan Bill is getting at {I believe] is that a FAR TOO LARGE proportion of society’s resources is being wasted on educating college graduates in these disciplines, only to see the vast majority of them end up as waitresses or driving taxi cabs.
RoatanBill might like to say sometihng like this himself, but he isn’t. He is making the claim that the social sciences are not scientific, roughly meaning that they do not produce powerful, useful new knowledge, which they clearly do.
That aside, ofc you are right, there are too many idiots at colleges and too many scoundrels making a living from them being there.
Much spanse to consider in article. Don’t think I agree on premise of Trump as a person who has always been something of an insider, though the review of increased chaos by mass immigration, and the same time those behind it attempting to disguiste the impact is important point.
So are points on globalism. Can still remember Ross Perot pointing at problem of nafta, letting corporations do mass producing overseas, and job loss here. Beside other things people don’t realize most wood is sent to china to be processed, then sent back. Can’t see anything good about that.
Since then many other changes also, almost forty percent of food is grown somewhere else now and imported, compared to before over ninety percent consumed here was grown here. Combined with the changes of mass immigration, doesn’t make sense. By any measure it seems power by and in globalism can only be gross. Thanks for the book review.
We should recognize the word citizen and other labels were concocted by the same cons behind supposed ‘govmt’ ‘state’ and monotheism religions around twelve hundred years ago. The word citizen contains dumb down fonetics/phonetics, ‘sit a zen’. The article title infers dying citizen, which is slave-level people, as not doing as much as before, but there have always been people who don’t want the schemes at all, and in terms of result of schemes, dying citizens is a constant, not something that’s changing. To be a ‘citizen’ is to choose slavery and means attack on or dying of some ‘citizens’ every minute such scheme exists, by claimed authority or dictators robbing or otherwise injuring or murdering people who don’t ‘obey’. It is not a matter of how many affected at any one time but that some or many people are affected all of the time in such scheme. It does not matter that ‘only’ some’ are attacked every day, or at intervals mass murdered.
The scheme of some claiming themselves ‘over’ others in paper dictator schemes and destruction result is proven by robbery such as ‘tax’, and much death over the last twelve hundred years, in daily assaults by supposed govt state or police or ‘courts’ attacking good type people who may tend toward freedom, whether falsely accused, or by false ‘lawsuits, or in ‘divorce, or ‘probate as scheming judges and lawyers rob and dictate over a dead family member’s property, or, by larger democide or genocide by the paper dictators.
The further proof of ongoing consequence in paper dictator schemes is by comparing to hundreds of thousands of years we existed in anarchism and voluntary tribes without much problem.
The problem isn’t ‘tribalism of them, its femy subservience of others to the schemes, and lazy failure to do own tribalism and shove back. Also failure to spot infiltrators among us who exist to route tribalism in others, remember half the cons are female. In short, ‘going along’ in ignorance is proven serious consequences. At this point of their world takeover there may be no choice, as people continued to sit. Though situation sick, rather not leave dead end so would note more people seem to recognize, though don’t know what to do because no one taught them to fight. To that would just say sharing info and focus where we live is base. ‘Moving’ is lazy and –works for them. If you dont have a predator drone its irrelevant where you ‘move’, same on supposed succession. To be alive requires real effort, not weakly clawing at false escape which the smiling vipers count on.
.
Happy New Year to you also Levtraro.
Your commentary over a long period has always been worthwhile reading and we all appreciate it.
This is today 2023-01-01 in Russia Today:
https://www.rt.com/news/569087-2022-cold-war-us/
Timur Fomenko is reading the comment section of TUR and then publishing my views in the media (just joking).
Excerpts:
“Seeing the rise of these countries [China and Russia], which had through America’s own approval integrated themselves within the global economy and prospered, but not adopted the American values as anticipated, the US veered back towards great power competition and began to provoke geopolitical conflict with a view to reasserting control over its wayward allies.”
“These actions by America have changed the world. While the average Westerner, deceived by the mainstream media discourse, blames Putin, the reality is the US is the one that has actively dismantled the post-Cold War 1991 international order precisely because it believes it now comes at the expense of American power. Part of this is the effort to actively ‘roll back’ globalization. By creating geopolitical conflict, the US strives to reassert its military influence whilst forcing its allies to decouple from the targeted enemy country, even if that comes at a great expense to that ally’s [Germany and the EU] economy.”
My emphasis, in the 2nd par.
My difference with Fomenko is that he a bit naïvely thinks the USA went forward with globalization to spread American values and westernize the world, including China and Russia, whereas I am more cynical, more realist, and thus I think the USA went forward with globalization to betray its working class and its middle class by getting cheap labour to enrich USA elites beyond the limits imposed by their own society.
Happy new year to Ron Unz and all the intelligent and independent commenters of this webzine. To the paid trolls, shills, and boring midwits posting links to MSM inanities, carry on, what else can you do poor chaps?
The “cultural differences” between the various strands of the White Race pale in comparison to the cultural differences between whites and the other main racial streams of humanity.
When Europeans only talked to other Europeans, the differences between, say, a Slav, Portuguese, German, and Englishman might have seemed deep and intractable. However, if you took one White man from each European country and dropped them into a Zimbabwean prison, all of the Whites would be forgetting their extensive “cultural differences” and finding their biological common ground REALLY quickly.
When Tayvontis and his ilk attack people randomly on the street, you can rest assured that they don’t particularly care whether someone is Canadian, American, German or English, or give a flying f whether the country was historically Catholic or not.
Victor Davis Hanson will make a princely sum on this book and it probably won’t move the needle much. He can’t seem to admit that Jews comprise the braintrust of the radical left and Democrat party and that it is fundamentally anti-white. Meanwhile, there is ever shrinking daylight between the radical left and what’s left of the homo loving conservative movement or conservatism, inc. to the point that increasing numbers of Republican leaning voters and specifically white Americans who vote Republican rightfully feel they have no representation.
Conservatives think they can browbeat the radical left into becoming semi-sane using facts and reason but this has proved to be a fool’s errand because those who vote Democrat have been radicalized (by Jewish owned media outlets) to the point where dialogue isn’t possible anymore. The radical demographic changes have only compounded matters.
I understand why you reacted in the manner that you did. You don’t understand our criminal justice system. There are courses for you to take. Just ask and I can provide some resources for you.
During WWII, the entire consumer economy was put on hold. ie:
Are you stupid, Focker? Or just unfamiliar with the concept of wages for work? Someone fed and roofed the families of those workers. Yes, you are indeed stupid.
.
Bottom Line: Those workers that were involved in the manufacture of weapons of death were paid wages that they could buy VERY LITTLE with. Basic needs like meat, butter, milk, petrol etc were RATIONED.
And, seeing as they could not buy much with their wages, many workers used their surplus to buy War Bonds.
At the conclusion of their extended work shifts in the armaments factories, these workers went back to their run down rat infested homes/apartments that they were living in during the Great Depression - the only difference being that these same homes during WWII were now 10 years older and shabbier than they were in the 1930's, due to wear and tear.
So Mr Ignorant Fool ‘Anonymous’, I suggest you learn some of the basics of economics – because you are totally clueless at this point.
Someone like you, who lives in the most fragile of glass houses, should not be throwing stones.
According to your account, you stupid fucking idiot, workers were paid wages, had food to eat (ever heard of Victory Gardens, ass?) and had surplus wages to invest. And I’m the one who doesn’t know economics?
Auto workers, farmers, etc. remained employed you stupid waste of sperm.
The solution is simple enough. If you have your heart set on getting a degree majoring in Sociology of Psychology or other humanities discipline, the government (ie: the Taxpayer) should not offer a student loan to subsidise your education.
Bottom Line: I like to read history but, in the event that I decide to make a career out of it, it should be done on my own dime.
I also believe there is much to be gained from REAL economics (ie: as taught by the Austrian Economic School of thought, as utilised by the likes of Dr Ron Paul and the preeminent financial forecaster in the world Peter Schiff).
Austrian Economics has been almost invariably right in predicting recessions in advance and explaining WHY said recessions came about in the first place (courtesy of the Austrian Business Cycle Theory) - as opposed to the Keynesian nonsense that is taught in most Economics faculties in the western world.
That said, we have FAR TOO MANY GRADUATES being produced in these humanities/liberal arts disciplines and this is ENABLED by Government funding of their education through student loans - which will never be paid back by most of these graduates as they have no marketable skills upon graduation.
I think you’re being too generous. The humanities and social sciences are not minimally beneficial as your prose suggests, but are actually detrimental to the society. Every idiotic development comes out of the class of people that are either sociopaths, regardless of education, or the purposely miseducated from the humanities and social sciences.
The lawyers you mentioned – are they STEM? Of course not. They are parasites on the society. Look at the damage economists have done by championing such ludicrous ideas as fiat currency, MMT, UBI, deficit spending, etc. These people do real damage to the society. We can handle the snake oil peddlers calling themselves clinical psychologists, sociologists, etc that largely run their scam on the terminally stupid, but there are certain parts of the humanities and social sciences that are very dangerous.
The English, History, Music and other variations of the basket weaving degrees are just a waste of time and money and do little harm to the society except, as you say, produce people that end up on the dole or at least at the bottom of the ladder due to poor life choices. If one looks at the STEM disciplines, none of them are designed to produce problem individuals even though some end up working on nuclear weapons, genocidal vaccines and other projects organized by the frauds in the political class, most of them from the humanities and social sciences.
As long as a Hudson or Peterson manages to get the attention and adulation those characters do, the society is not safe from their mental poison. There are just too many easily influenced shallow thinkers that believe their schtick and then help drift the entire society toward what we have now.
The humanities and social sciences need to become as relevant as phrenology, alchemy and astrology. I’d suggest a maximum of a bachelor degree for these nonsense “professions” to wean the society off their scam and help the weak of mind choose a different life direction that might actually be beneficial to them and the society as a whole. Further, I’d make every higher education institution guarantee a job to their graduates for 5 years after graduation, functioning as a job placement service, or be forced to refund 5X the tuition they received to help compensate the people they obviously cheated. This would rapidly collapse the humanities and social sciences.
Dead wrong about that as you are about everything else.
In an emergency situation, no one needs any of the bullshit artists with political science, economics, sociology, etc degrees.
Your limited capacity to grasp reality and the elements of good living?Replies: @RoatanBill
why am I not a voter, why do I detest the govt and their allied weapons carriers, why do I champion the very things most people shrink from, namely anarchism and atheism?
What flavor of bullshitology degree do you hold?
I see your assertion lacks any information that might even hint at it being accurate. If you’re such a smart guy, explain your position and show how an economist, for example, is needed when the fiat currency heads toward zero value as is happening in real time at present. Or possibly what good a philosopher is when the pumps stop working for lack of electrical power at the sewage treatment plant or water treatment facility.
Why not tell us how a History or English major is going to help out when transportation stops because the fuel pumps don’t work and there’s no actual money to purchase it. Can you show how a political science type can help move food to the cities?
All you humanities and social science types are a grift on society. Your areas of supposed expertise are a giant fraud that will be exposed when the SHTF. If I were you, I’d pretend to be a ditch digger in the not too distant future to avoid being tarred and feathered by the people your class of frauds has duped.
Would you fuck off already, troll.
Agree. Even the Taiwanese TSMC, once installed in Arizona: how safe is their billion USD investment in helping to roll back globalization and re-industrialize the USA if and when China takes control of Taiwan? Is it wise for TSMC to invest billions USD in the USA given geopolitical realities?
Other analysts are observing this process of trying to roll back globalization. Today there is this in SouthFront:
But like I said, it’s already too late, the free world (those not forced to follow the USA) has already grown too much economically at the expense of the American-elite-engineered American decline. So even if the USA manages to re-industrialize, this will have to be done at the expense of its attachments (the EU, NK, Japan and Taiwan) while the free world will remain economically powerful and geopolitically independent, thus making USA geopolitical project fail.
Another informative example of how American elites fucked up big time with globalization is the Russian economy. The thousands of sanctions erected since 2014 did not succeed in bringing down the Russian economy and terminate their independence. All those sanctions achieved was a mere reduction of Russian GDP growth, but Russians remained strong, resilient and independent, as it became evident this year. The Russians accomplished this thanks to globalization and very importantly thanks to China’s economic growth under globalization.
But the worst blunder of American elites was to let China grow under WTO rules. It made the American rich richer but it doomed USA geopolitical project, not to mention all the shrinking of American middle-class and subsequent enlargement of the income gap, family indebtness and suffering.
In an emergency situation, no one needs any of the bullshit artists with political science, economics, sociology, etc degrees.
Dead wrong about that as you are about everything else.
why am I not a voter, why do I detest the govt and their allied weapons carriers, why do I champion the very things most people shrink from, namely anarchism and atheism?
Your limited capacity to grasp reality and the elements of good living?
Well, that explains most of it.
And why solve ANY problem if it’s pulling in that much lucre?
OK, Never mind.
The humanities don't make any claims as to the scientific method, you copper-bottomed dunce.As to the social sciences, you make this claim with some regularity on this site. But repetition will never make you right.As I have pointed out to you before, for better or worse the world is organized and run by people who are trained in and understand the social sciences. Every day, you, Mr Bill, wake up, brush your teeth and then spend the rest of the day following the formulas for living and thinking that have laid out for you by the social scientists of politics and marketing, psychology, philosophy, sociology, anthropology, and linguistics. That this now applies to all of us may have been the greatest social revolution of the 20th century.And I can show that even you do not believe what you are claiming. For example, I am absolutely certain that you have very strong and probably fixed ideas on economics - a social science.I am also certain that you depend on and apply every day a variety of modern principles of human psychology. I know for a fact that you, Mr Bill, believe that you understand many aspects of human behavior and intelligence to a level that you are sure that you can accurately predict it and that every single day of your life you apply these intuitions and you are sure that they are based on your own observations and experience and so are very well founded indeed!I am sure that when you are to be found in crowds or interact in social groups you behave exactly as the social science profiles predict you will act. I am sure that they have your supermarket buying behavior identified to a nicety. I am sure that your internet usage tells the professionals almost as much about you as you might think you know yourself. So contrary to your own claims, your own daily actions prove that you do not in fact disdain the social sciences and that you do believe that it is possible through observation and theory testing to assemble the type of knowledge that is created through research in the various areas of the social sciences.Know thyself, knucklehead.Replies: @RoatanBill, @Truth Vigilante
From my engineering perspective, the humanities and social sciences are completely bereft of any scientific method.
No one is denying that there a place for the humanities, social sciences, liberal arts degrees etc, but what Roatan Bill is getting at {I believe] is that a FAR TOO LARGE proportion of society’s resources is being wasted on educating college graduates in these disciplines, only to see the vast majority of them end up as waitresses or driving taxi cabs.
I recall reading an article in the late 1980’s exploring why Japan was fast becoming the economic and manufacturing powerhouse on the planet while America’s fortunes were stagnating in relative terms.
They found that, on a per capita basis, Japan had something like 10-12 times more engineers, while the U.S had eighteen (18) times more lawyers.
You see, the U.S was (and still is), a litigious society whereby ‘frivolous’ GDP was generated by suing one another – although this practice does nothing to improve our material well being or health outcomes.
Today China is the manufacturing dynamo on the planet and (no prizes for guessing this), it produces far more STEM graduates than the U.S on a per capita basis.
Meanwhile, the U.S churns outs more useless Sociologists and such – a major reason why the U.S is crumbling and has become a Socialist Shit-hole.
Bottom Line: I like to read history but, in the event that I decide to make a career out of it, it should be done on my own dime.
I also believe there is much to be gained from REAL economics (ie: as taught by the Austrian Economic School of thought, as utilised by the likes of Dr Ron Paul and the preeminent financial forecaster in the world Peter Schiff).
Austrian Economics has been almost invariably right in predicting recessions in advance and explaining WHY said recessions came about in the first place (courtesy of the Austrian Business Cycle Theory) – as opposed to the Keynesian nonsense that is taught in most Economics faculties in the western world.That said, we have FAR TOO MANY GRADUATES being produced in these humanities/liberal arts disciplines and this is ENABLED by Government funding of their education through student loans – which will never be paid back by most of these graduates as they have no marketable skills upon graduation.
The solution is simple enough. If you have your heart set on getting a degree majoring in Sociology of Psychology or other humanities discipline, the government (ie: the Taxpayer) should not offer a student loan to subsidise your education.
You should pay for it yourself. This would ensure far fewer of this ‘parasitic* class’ of university graduates.
(*I call them ‘parasitic’ because a disproportionate number of them will end up on welfare and thus become a burden on society).
RoatanBill might like to say sometihng like this himself, but he isn't. He is making the claim that the social sciences are not scientific, roughly meaning that they do not produce powerful, useful new knowledge, which they clearly do.That aside, ofc you are right, there are too many idiots at colleges and too many scoundrels making a living from them being there.
No one is denying that there a place for the humanities, social sciences, liberal arts degrees etc, but what Roatan Bill is getting at {I believe] is that a FAR TOO LARGE proportion of society’s resources is being wasted on educating college graduates in these disciplines, only to see the vast majority of them end up as waitresses or driving taxi cabs.
And guess what.
Politics is downstream from culture.
And ‘race’ is downstream from psychology.
Lucky old Russia. The former Russian Chief Rabbi, now safely ensconced in Occupied Palestine, has ordered Russian Jews to leave Russia. No doubt the new flagrantly fascist and racist Zionazi regime is more to his liking.
Long on Wong. Wong is not wrong.
That's nowhere near true. Being a lying fuckwad waste of sperm is no way to go through life.
India’s great Nalanda University, a University that had survived most of two millennia
Are you stupid, Focker? Or just unfamiliar with the concept of wages for work? Someone fed and roofed the families of those workers. Yes, you are indeed stupid.Replies: @Truth Vigilante
Yes GDP went up – after all, you can generate a hell of a lot GDP by making some B29’s or building a single USS Missouri Battleship.
But none of the above feeds your family or puts a roof over your head.
Are you stupid, Focker? Or just unfamiliar with the concept of wages for work? Someone fed and roofed the families of those workers. Yes, you are indeed stupid.
During WWII, the entire consumer economy was put on hold. ie:
1) No private automobiles were being manufactured
2) No houses were being built
3) A huge assortment of consumer items were prevented by law from being produced (as the materials used in their production were diverted to the war effort).
Bottom Line: Those workers that were involved in the manufacture of weapons of death were paid wages that they could buy VERY LITTLE with. Basic needs like meat, butter, milk, petrol etc were RATIONED.
And, seeing as they could not buy much with their wages, many workers used their surplus to buy War Bonds.
At the conclusion of their extended work shifts in the armaments factories, these workers went back to their run down rat infested homes/apartments that they were living in during the Great Depression – the only difference being that these same homes during WWII were now 10 years older and shabbier than they were in the 1930’s, due to wear and tear..
So Mr Ignorant Fool ‘Anonymous’, I suggest you learn some of the basics of economics – because you are totally clueless at this point.
Someone like you, who lives in the most fragile of glass houses, should not be throwing stones.
According to your account, you stupid fucking idiot, workers were paid wages, had food to eat (ever heard of Victory Gardens, ass?) and had surplus wages to invest. And I'm the one who doesn't know economics?
So Mr Ignorant Fool ‘Anonymous’, I suggest you learn some of the basics of economics – because you are totally clueless at this point.
Someone like you, who lives in the most fragile of glass houses, should not be throwing stones.
As a studied economist – it not for nothing that Micro economics is the only participle discipline that produces results. Like cost per unit etc. The macro economics is straight out forgery,
And guess what.
Politics is downstream from culture.
Culture is downstream from race.
Then why does the white race have so many different cultures?
A fact that has so far made unity among them almost impossible.
That’s not to say there wasn’t any continuity. Of course there was. Enough to make a civilization and nations within that civilization. But continuity without unity makes that civlization susceptible to infiltration and subversion. Which, unfortunately, is how things have turned out. In short, the parasite chose its host well.
The problem can be solved. In part by turning that continuity into unity. And that can be accomplished through a negative principle, ie; by giving up the myth that the only way to unite is through a political ideology, or Christianity. Whites are never going to think the same. Besides SAMETHINK is the desire of the weak-minded.
For now, whites only need to unite in the same way they’re being attacked – as whites. After all, for all of their differences, it’s the one thing they actually do have in common. The only thing they need to say in unison is No! to being attacked, and Yes! to life.
Their life. It might not be much. But it’s a start. And you have to start somewhere.
Nice fantasy. After all of that, the Jews will have an honest, face to face dialogue with the American people, acknowledge their “privilege”, and voluntarily cede a large chunk of their power and influence to the historic Heritage American body politic.
I’m rooting for total collapse. How and why the toothless, uninspiring CivNat We’re A Nation Of Immigrants bloviations of the “VDH”‘s and their ilk still has an audience is puzzling but even the dimmest bulbs will eventually see that America is irredeemable, and not going back to even Bush II year levels of social cohesion and affluence, much less Eisenhower levels.
Fresno State – even less prestigious than Long Beach State (origin of MacDonald everybody’s favorite retiree at Unz).
Some states in India were gentler and juster than others at certain times, but they were always the exception. Most of the Indo-Gangetic plain has from time immemorial been characterized by institutionalized barbarity and the use of religion and philosophy to justify any kind of oppression. Contrary to what you assert, Islam, even though it burned universities (before its own universities were burned by the Moguls and the Rajputs), did not change the rules of the game nor the general character of the population. Actually the Taliban phenomenon is something that existed long before Islam was ever contrived as a religion, and rather issued from the region of Bactria to the rest of the Islamic world it made far more tyrannical (nearly all writers of Hadiths were of the Northern subcontinent) : the reason for that barbarity is clearly genetic no matter the religion it expresses through. The Hindu world if we are to trust all sacred texts and the very historical texts they left is characterized by an absolute absence of political hope and also of political courage on the part of the whole intellectual elite : no matter they are Brahmanic or anti-Brahmanic the only virtues they develop and praise are similar to those extolled by the Talmud. Feeling the duty to leave a better world to one’s descendants is utterly taboo for all religions of Indian origin or that acclimate in India for too long. Buddhism has always proved to be even worse than Hinduism as for the political results, as you can see now in Sri Lanka. Both Hindu India and Buddhist India were first and foremost characterized by mass surveillance police states that inspired the Soviet one. All Hindu gurus that dare express a political point of view nowadays hope for a world dictatorship capable of reestablishing the caste system of yore, but this time with the instrument of mass electronic surveillance.
Firstly, I would not hatch a plan with nitwits unaware they are carrying TRACKING DEVICES. MEDIA LAB @ U of TORONTO was extremely PRONTO on HELPING their OH so slow neighbors to the south in wranglin’ up dem dare vermits! Sounds all FIVE EYES like, plus the proud Boys is a CANADIAN outfit originally:)
“‘Get money’ is the…….empty motto.”
The only societies in which “Get Money” is not a motto are static societies. In other words societies in which you “know your place.” In which life is not an adventure. Barring the accident of winning the lucky sperm lottery your life is set at birth. No escape. Of course America is HATED by all the resentful bystanders like you.
People have tried, trust me. VDARE goes on year after year having no effect whatever and Peter B just keeps on as if anyone notices. He's getting on in years. It's either very sad or his retirement hobby.Replies: @Liza
Somebody, give Peter Brimelow a call.
Oh, I dunno; he must be having some effect: a rich person donated enough money for him to buy a castle (to serve as a venue for conferences).
An interviewer asked Peter, and he replied, as follows:
Lydia mentioned on a podcast that two donors “put up the money for me to buy this historic stone castle.” Who were those donors?
DO YOU REALLY THINK I’M GOING TO TELL YOU? However, you may be interested to know that the major donor was Jewish.
https://vdare.com/articles/washington-post-s-ellie-silverman-is-coming-for-vdare-com-and-christmas
Can “true citizenship”/MAGA/civic nationalism provide any utility for the cause of White America?
Healthy communities… at the local level… civically engaged… respect for localism and regionalism… culture and indigenous customs… true citizenship… nationalism.
These are some of the key ideas that should probably be upheld. Everything is downstream from this.
The racial profile of a regional community cannot be ignored because what is local entails family, friendship, kinship and culture, and these things tend to have a genetic sketch, but no nation was ever constructed or maintained with “racial advocacy” as its principal founding value.
Westerners of a conservative leaning overemphasize the wrong thing, and the fetish fixation on race crowds out everything else that is essential and important, like home and hearth, and loyalty and decency.
Race is downstream from community. Protect the latter and preserve the former. (The converse is also true; but if you try to protect race at the expense of community, you’ll save neither)
If globalism hurt America, then globalism accomplished what America’s globalist elites intended: Pollute its cultural core, weaken its identity, undermine cohesiveness, and scatter America.
There are elites in America who perceive nationalism as a threat, borders as an inconvenience, and patriotism as ugly bigotry. Among many of them, Marxism seems to be their thing.
Economic class Marxism was tried and failed, so it seems they’ve moved onto something new but the same, cultural Marxism: a dialectical view of oppression of one dominant group, gender, race over another. Marxists discovered that oppression and the historical arc weren’t just economic phenomenons, but everywhere.
Globalism, neoconservatism, neoliberalism, economic Marxism, cultural Marxism… it’s all the same in important ways. They all have contempt for regional culture, the local, the indigenous, the traditional, the family, the home and hearth, and the nation-state.
Hanson is also a neocon, anti-Russia, pro-Zionist, and writes against “antisemitism”. I’m not sure there are many useful answers you’ll get from him.
Capitalism is innately reactionary and destructive. ‘Liberal’ capitalism does not exist, save for the moneyed elites. For the rest it is ‘conservatism’ red in tooth and dental implants.
In several major and minor ways.
But how are the elites trying to roll back globalism?
I don’t see the Chinese manufacturing coming back to the US so much as moving to other countries in Asia.
The humanities don't make any claims as to the scientific method, you copper-bottomed dunce.As to the social sciences, you make this claim with some regularity on this site. But repetition will never make you right.As I have pointed out to you before, for better or worse the world is organized and run by people who are trained in and understand the social sciences. Every day, you, Mr Bill, wake up, brush your teeth and then spend the rest of the day following the formulas for living and thinking that have laid out for you by the social scientists of politics and marketing, psychology, philosophy, sociology, anthropology, and linguistics. That this now applies to all of us may have been the greatest social revolution of the 20th century.And I can show that even you do not believe what you are claiming. For example, I am absolutely certain that you have very strong and probably fixed ideas on economics - a social science.I am also certain that you depend on and apply every day a variety of modern principles of human psychology. I know for a fact that you, Mr Bill, believe that you understand many aspects of human behavior and intelligence to a level that you are sure that you can accurately predict it and that every single day of your life you apply these intuitions and you are sure that they are based on your own observations and experience and so are very well founded indeed!I am sure that when you are to be found in crowds or interact in social groups you behave exactly as the social science profiles predict you will act. I am sure that they have your supermarket buying behavior identified to a nicety. I am sure that your internet usage tells the professionals almost as much about you as you might think you know yourself. So contrary to your own claims, your own daily actions prove that you do not in fact disdain the social sciences and that you do believe that it is possible through observation and theory testing to assemble the type of knowledge that is created through research in the various areas of the social sciences.Know thyself, knucklehead.Replies: @RoatanBill, @Truth Vigilante
From my engineering perspective, the humanities and social sciences are completely bereft of any scientific method.
The humanities don’t make any claims as to the scientific method, you copper-bottomed dunce.
I never claimed they did. I claim that they do not. If you had some reading comprehension you would know that. The name calling is a sure sign that your argument is correct, at least in your warped mind.
What you describe is the snooping that goes on in the world which most people are against as an invasion of their privacy. That you present this as some good is telling. I know propaganda works on the weak of will and mind, but I’m not in either category.
That I have certain habits that others also have proves absolutely nothing. If I was as predictable and as regimented via psychological conditioning as you claim, then why did I move out of the shithole US, why am I not a voter, why do I detest the govt and their allied weapons carriers, why do I champion the very things most people shrink from, namely anarchism and atheism?
It would appear your psychological conditioning didn’t work all that well on me and that’s because my engineering training taught me to think critically and for myself.
One final observation : I wrote the above without ever having to resort to the ad hominem. Did you ever expect that to be possible?
Well which is it ? Do you want an economy like China OR a socialist economy ? (They're mutually exclusive).
America’s only hope is to copy China and have a socialist, planned economy. An economy that considers the needs of the working class, and not the “wants” of the inheritor class; i.e. a return to the New Deal under FDR.
As for the 'return to FDR's New Deal', obviously you've been reading the Zio published history books and misinformation from the small hats that socialism is the cure.
Big Government is ALWAYS and EVERYWHERE the problem - and has always been throughout history.
The ONLY way to reduce government is to DEFUND it and leave that money in the hands of the citizenry that will spend their money more prudently.
You have much to learn my friend about what generates real wealth and a more equitable distribution of that wealth.
Bottom Line: FDR was a DISASTER for America. He not only impoverished countless millions of Americans but, warmonger that he was, he got the U.S involved in a world war that served the agenda of his Jewish masters.
What no one understands about World War II and the Great Depression, is that the post war Boom was not supposed to happen along the lines of your ‘war spending’ argument, that with the end of hostilities the Depression would continue.
The issue is that post war economic Boom was fueled by the fact that the raw materials economy, particularly agriculture, was being paid Parity Prices for full production. Remember FDR tried to raise Ag prices by destroying production, which was rendered unconstitutional under US v. Butler.
The war required full production and Parity Prices were determined relative to the free market period of 1910-14 when Agriculture earnings were on par with manufacturing and service sectors.
With Parity at full production, earned income was created that was spent into the economy, and where the Raw Materials National Council under Carl H. Wilken understood from the economic record that every dollar earned in Agriculture multiplied itself by a factor of seven when national income was recorded.
When one takes away Parity, earnings go down, and thus less earned income is created to run the economy, which then prompts borrowing at interest.
Parity was eventually stopped, though it is still the law, when in 1952 Congress bowed to General Motors who wanted to sell cars on credit and Parity economics, aka people’s capitalism, was destroyed to service the money lenders.
You can blame lots of so called ‘capitalist’ for the socialist shit hole….because all of these idiots do not understand basic economics, that begins with paying the farmer their due! All else is stealing.
VD Hanson never saw a US war of aggression he didn’t support or a Confederate memorial he didn’t want demolished.
When the SHTF, the societies of the world will be looking towards the people with real demonstrable skills to pull their chestnuts out of the fire. Engineers and the trades will be called upon to solve real world problems brought about by the policies from the folks in the humanities and social sciences that are so detached from reality that they created the problems we see today.
In an emergency situation, no one needs any of the bullshit artists with political science, economics, sociology, etc degrees. They will need practical people to do practical things to keep lots of folks from dying. It’s going to be the practical people that are going to save your sorry ass even though we know you’re worthless and we should just let you die off.
Dead wrong about that as you are about everything else.
In an emergency situation, no one needs any of the bullshit artists with political science, economics, sociology, etc degrees.
Your limited capacity to grasp reality and the elements of good living?Replies: @RoatanBill
why am I not a voter, why do I detest the govt and their allied weapons carriers, why do I champion the very things most people shrink from, namely anarchism and atheism?
From my engineering perspective, the humanities and social sciences are completely bereft of any scientific method.
The humanities don’t make any claims as to the scientific method, you copper-bottomed dunce.
As to the social sciences, you make this claim with some regularity on this site. But repetition will never make you right.
As I have pointed out to you before, for better or worse the world is organized and run by people who are trained in and understand the social sciences. Every day, you, Mr Bill, wake up, brush your teeth and then spend the rest of the day following the formulas for living and thinking that have laid out for you by the social scientists of politics and marketing, psychology, philosophy, sociology, anthropology, and linguistics. That this now applies to all of us may have been the greatest social revolution of the 20th century.
And I can show that even you do not believe what you are claiming.
For example, I am absolutely certain that you have very strong and probably fixed ideas on economics – a social science.
I am also certain that you depend on and apply every day a variety of modern principles of human psychology.
I know for a fact that you, Mr Bill, believe that you understand many aspects of human behavior and intelligence to a level that you are sure that you can accurately predict it and that every single day of your life you apply these intuitions and you are sure that they are based on your own observations and experience and so are very well founded indeed!
I am sure that when you are to be found in crowds or interact in social groups you behave exactly as the social science profiles predict you will act. I am sure that they have your supermarket buying behavior identified to a nicety. I am sure that your internet usage tells the professionals almost as much about you as you might think you know yourself.
So contrary to your own claims, your own daily actions prove that you do not in fact disdain the social sciences and that you do believe that it is possible through observation and theory testing to assemble the type of knowledge that is created through research in the various areas of the social sciences.
Know thyself, knucklehead.
The solution is simple enough. If you have your heart set on getting a degree majoring in Sociology of Psychology or other humanities discipline, the government (ie: the Taxpayer) should not offer a student loan to subsidise your education.
Bottom Line: I like to read history but, in the event that I decide to make a career out of it, it should be done on my own dime.
I also believe there is much to be gained from REAL economics (ie: as taught by the Austrian Economic School of thought, as utilised by the likes of Dr Ron Paul and the preeminent financial forecaster in the world Peter Schiff).
Austrian Economics has been almost invariably right in predicting recessions in advance and explaining WHY said recessions came about in the first place (courtesy of the Austrian Business Cycle Theory) - as opposed to the Keynesian nonsense that is taught in most Economics faculties in the western world.
That said, we have FAR TOO MANY GRADUATES being produced in these humanities/liberal arts disciplines and this is ENABLED by Government funding of their education through student loans - which will never be paid back by most of these graduates as they have no marketable skills upon graduation.
Jews take over humanities and social sciences, use them to dominate and then destroy society.
Cement-headed “engineer” deduces the answer: eliminate humanities and social sciences.
Jew replies:
“In the United States at this time Liberalism is not only the dominant but even the sole intellectual tradition. For it is the plain fact that nowadays there are no conservative or reactionary ideas in general circulation. This does not mean, of course, that there is no impulse to conservatism or to reaction. Such impulses are certainly very strong, perhaps even stronger than most of us know. But the conservative impulse and the reactionary impulse do not, with some isolated and some ecclesiastical exceptions, express themselves in ideas but only in action or in irritable mental gestures which seek to resemble ideas.” — Lionel Trilling, The Liberal Imagination (1950)
Conservatism: the only political perspective that went from barbarism to barbarism, without passing through civilization or decadence.
Is it your point that you don’t like youtube ads? Just download before you watch. Internet Download Manager is a great product for the purpose.
“Civic nationalism” or as iSteve calls it, “citizenism”, is pointless, a dead end. Try to do “civic nationalism” in Uganda, Libya or Mexico and see how it works. There are no “proposition nations”, and muh Constitution is just a piece of paper. Everything comes down from a common ethnicity/culture/religion. Countries are tribes. Sure, the U.S. and other Western countries will trudge along for a while, but the writing’s on the wall. No multicultural countries last for long (well, not functional ones, anyway).
America was a Constitutional Republic.
Only a moral and responsible people can have that.
The Synagogue of Satan and its erstwhile pets are nowhere near that definition.
Scoundrels like “conservatives ” also lack morality.
They worship the almighty dollar.
It’s all about race. Nation, culture and laws.
The phenotypes follow the genotypes.
Irregardless of the hubris of the Bagel Boyz, they gravitate towards the third world because they belong there.
The Synagogue of Satan has never invented or built anything on its own.
Parasites prefer each other and hate their hosts.
Whites have been too kind to their enemies.
The Holy Roman Empire is rising.
Laugh now, the foundation is already laid.
White supremacy is Western Civilization.
The enemy speaks in reverse, as they are.
The future is space stations, moon bases and Mars colonies.
Those that do not fit that paradigm must perish.
The Corporation always gets what it wants.
We make the rules.
India’s great Nalanda University, a University that had survived most of two millennia
That’s nowhere near true. Being a lying fuckwad waste of sperm is no way to go through life.
Anecdote: a few years ago I was on the Washington DC subway when a nigger entered the car and started shouting “This is my motherfucking car!” over and over. I buzzed the nigger driver and explained the situation and asked him to call the police. He asked “What race is he?” and I said “What do you think?” then the nigger driver hung up and people around me accused me of being racist. Now I know the right answer would have been “He’s white” or “I can’t tell” or better yet “He’s got a gun”. Jesus fuck, some niggers go out of their way to make themselves difficult to like.
Yes GDP went up – after all, you can generate a hell of a lot GDP by making some B29’s or building a single USS Missouri Battleship.
But none of the above feeds your family or puts a roof over your head.
Are you stupid, Focker? Or just unfamiliar with the concept of wages for work? Someone fed and roofed the families of those workers. Yes, you are indeed stupid.
During WWII, the entire consumer economy was put on hold. ie:
Are you stupid, Focker? Or just unfamiliar with the concept of wages for work? Someone fed and roofed the families of those workers. Yes, you are indeed stupid.
.
Bottom Line: Those workers that were involved in the manufacture of weapons of death were paid wages that they could buy VERY LITTLE with. Basic needs like meat, butter, milk, petrol etc were RATIONED.
And, seeing as they could not buy much with their wages, many workers used their surplus to buy War Bonds.
At the conclusion of their extended work shifts in the armaments factories, these workers went back to their run down rat infested homes/apartments that they were living in during the Great Depression - the only difference being that these same homes during WWII were now 10 years older and shabbier than they were in the 1930's, due to wear and tear.
Well done.
Clinton and Bush should be tried for treason and publicly hung. Obama should be as well for flame throwing the racial Molotov Cocktail that spawned BLM.
Setting aside their war mongering and murderous hearts- what should the punishment be for a man and his repellent wife who tanked one of the greatest economies in world history – Bill Clinton and NAFTA.
Most of the economy now is moon dust, fairy dust…what real products does America create anymore?
“After 22 months and 40 million dollars no Russian collusion with members of the Trump campaign was found.“
The author of this piece is not accurate.
William Barr concluded that Mueller:
1. did not have enough proof of obstruction to convict.
2. did not find enough proof of conspiracy to convict, but does not offer judgement on the proof of obstruction he found.
PROOF is defined as any evidence that tends to make your position on a matter in a dispute more likely. INDICTMENTS require a certain amount of PROOF on whether a defendant is guilty or innocent. The level of PROOF required for a prosecutor to get an INDICTMENT of a defendant–the amount of evidence on the question whether a suspect is guilty that a prosecutor must have to move a case into the criminal justice system–is set at the level of PROBABLE CAUSE.
When a prosecutor says “I do not have enough proof to bring an indictment”, it means there is “insufficient proof” on a matter of dispute–the suspect’s guilt–to reach the “probable cause” standard of proof required for indictment. Trump’s defenders say there is “no evidence/no proof” of collusion. Except there was PROOF. Mueller has tons of it in his report after nearly two years of investigating. Mueller MET the PROBABLE CAUSE standard.
The issue is that Mueller needed to have PROOF at a much higher level than PROBABLE CAUSE to secure a conviction. To secure a CONVICTION means a prosecutor must have PROOF that is BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT–a term meaning a decision by a judge or jury that a given defendant is in fact guilty.
Under the ethical guidelines governing Mueller’s work, he is not supposed to seek an INDICTMENT of a defendant unless and until he believed he had enough PROOF to secure a CONVICTION as well. He had enough PROOF at the PROBABLE CAUSE level to get an INDICTMENT–it is detailed in his report–but he believes a jury will not CONVICT the defendant because there is not PROOF BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT.
There are two standards here–the media is mixing up the terms really badly.
Mueller could proceed with the case–he could INDICT the defendant since there is enough PROOF, but he chose not to because he cannot CONVICT him. Why? The standard for BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT is that the PROOF must be at a 90% level to secure a CONVICTION. Mueller in his report provided the percentages of his PROOF. PROBABLE CAUSE is 25% of PROOF that someone committed a crime, while BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT is 90%.
You need to distinguish EVIDENCE and PROOF. In short, PROOF is a *type* of EVIDENCE. When Trump defenders say “no EVIDENCE” what they actually mean is “no PROOF”—though they are ridiculously misstating their case in both instances. Mueller had PROOF of conspiracy enough to INDICT (at the level of PROBABLE CAUSE). But he did not have the PROOF that was BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT (necessary for a CONVICTION). Remember, Mueller was conducting a narrow scope of the overall collusion question (which there are almost two dozen ongoing investigations on this and other matters)–whether Trump was engaged in a “conspiracy” with two Russian entities, the IRA or the GRU.
Since one can collude through obstruction of justice, and because Mueller did say he found PROOF of that crime, we know he found PROOF of COLLUSION…just not enough to secure a CONVICTION. Moreover, Congress does NOT require PROOF that is BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT to deem someone a national security threat. That is up to each member of Congress