Rabbis are usually, typically heterosexually married men Such accusations don’t work there.
Same for Protestant and orthodox pastors – who also do not have tons of solid gold chalices and stuff to melt down.

Heterosexually married men NEVER pull their unit out for another male. NEVER!

Not true. The first thing Constantine emperor did was Stalin like kill off 300,000 political, religious enemies. It was Rome and Greece that were tolerant, never Christianity. Catholicism was essentially the same as woke or communism for the next thousand years killing a hundred times more people than communism ever did with its fictitious Jewish ideology.. It was the Germanics who changed things with their genetic disposition to free thought via protestantism that was essentially questioning. This led to the abolition of slavery, capitalism, nation and empire building, modern democracy and liberalism. The same liberalism that poisons their blood and destroys civilisation.

Arabs are Semites, Persians are not.

Anonymous{963] wrote:

I can’t help but feel a tickle of amusement when the Sophists pull out their own “intellectual rigor” and always play the same semantic shell game – “well it’s not actually doctrine, but…”

Long delay in responding but better late than never:
Above Anonymous{963] creates a straw-man which he couldn’t defend from anything I wrote in post #420—–the post to which he responded.

My post #420 was a reply to Hulkamania’s (Post #38) which was mostly a vague rant about Papism none of which he did or even could justify from Catholic Dogmas concerning the Papacy. In fact Hulkamania would have had difficulty justifying his vague claims through an honest historic review of the history of the Popes—good and bad. Hulkamania’s vitriol against the Papacy was akin to the un-reasoned and largely ad hominem rants made by the apostate priest Martin Luther. Luther’s written works are so filled with unsupported vulgarity that his supporting protestant theologians/historians never quote for fear of discrediting him.

In my reply to Hulkamia I make quite clear that Catholic Universalism espoused by Origen is NOT part of Catholic Dogma or any Church teaching binding on its members. I’m afraid there is no “but” in there.

Anonymous[963]

Good to see you saying that the Pope, (indeed the Antichrist, where all the sin of the world emanates from – especially modernism realized as the merging and exaltation of pagan ideals (!) into Catholic doctrine to become secular humanism, Social Teaching, and globalism – teaching pagans. . . .

Of course I say nothing of the sort. Who is the sophist now?

Then Anonymous[963] dove head-long into a rant which had absolutely nothing to do with the discussion begun by Hulkamania (post #38) or my reply to him (post #420). Nonetheless I’ll make a few points in reply to it:

1. All the Vatican II Constitutions promulgated by anti-pope Paul VI in 1970 were declared by the Vatican authorities to be pastoral and not dogmatic. Technically this is correct however anti-pope Paul VI and all the anti-popes after him treated these constitutions as the new guiding “dogmas” of the Vatican II Church. Most (if not all) of the Vatican II Constitutions contain heresies inconsistent with actual Catholic Dogmas propounded in the previous 1900 years of Catholic history.

2. As a note of interest the heretical Vatican II Constitutions were in large part designed by anti-pope Paul VI (and his loyalists) to move “Catholic” doctrine closer to Protestantism and Judaism—both in its beliefs and its worship.

3. Two of Luther’s principle, largely invented “dogmas” were that
a. every man was his own authority in the interpretation of Scripture and
b. that once a man professed belief in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior his/her salvation was guaranteed no matter how vile their behaviors were before and subsequent to that profession.

Luther himself discovered that after he let the genies of (a) and (b) out of bag that conditions in Europe at the time turned to disaster—-30 years of war. Luther hoped to depose the Catholic Church’s authority and replace it with himself. Sadly once Luther proposed (a) his authority with regard to Scripture was shucked by many of his followers.

4. Lutheranism and Calvanism splintered into 100s or 1000s of different protestant sects each claiming to know the correct interpretation of Scripture. Hence Anonyymous[963]’s interpretation of Scripture is just one among many that has No greater validity—–according to protestantism.

5. Luther’s invention of protestant Justificationism was a direct result of his own rampant sinfulness. He found himself unable to turn from sin and needed a way to avoid Hell. Lutherian Justification was his personal invention which taught that any profession of faith in Jesus Christ shielded the professor from Hell no matter what subsequent evil acts were committed. Luther saw the disaster in Germany and Europe that resulted from this. The Protestant doctrine of Justification is closer to that of Talmudic Judaism and Islam than to anything Christ taught in the New Testament. That is, very little causes their adherents to enter Hell. Freed as the Protestant, Jew, and Muslim is from the prospect of Hell for doing evil may be the proximate cause of much Evil in the world.

6. As the Vatican II Church attempted to move closer to the evils of protestantism in the Vatican II Constitutions in 1970 so did it also in its 1999 agreement about the validity of Lutherian Justification.

The FBI has being making a public clown-show of itself since 9/11, then they went overdrive on showing their disrepute Sandy Hoax onward..

“The cook did it” eh Dr. Jones.

better for you to read where it says:

God chooses the seemingly foolish, weak, and despised things of the world—and people—to shame the wise, powerful, and esteemed, so that no one can boast in their own strength but only in God.

Learn a song Jones, learn a song both you and Chris Hedges in fact:

Video Link

good luck

Powerful lens on history, race, and overlooked voices.

“Do you know how many thousands of performances Michael Jackson did in front of caucasian audiences?”

Probably less than one.

Can we persuade Pope Leo to call a Council to delete most of the Old Testament from the Christian bible?

This is fascinating. I had no idea they were two such culturally distinct groups. I was aware they were anti-Catholic Judaizers who reject universal salvation of the new covenant and believe heretically that God has chosen a few “elect” for salvation.

Tacitus was none other than Poggio Bracciolini who was not only an avid manuscript hunter; he was also a skilled calligrapher with trained scribes at his disposal, capable of imitating the script and style of ancient documents with remarkable precision. Someone with Bracciolini’s expertise would have been well positioned to forge texts that could easily pass as authentic relics of antiquity. In fact, the pseudo-Tacitus might very well be Bracciolini himself.

If the new Pope looks like a White, thinks like a White and acts like a White he’s a White. If he looks like a White, thinks like a nigger and acts like a Jew he’s a woke White who wishes he’d been born a nigger, Jew, or transvestite.

Although it’s a great statement and a very true one about Jewish architecture, that quote is NOT from the MOMA catalogue from the 1988 show. MOMA and Deconstructivist architecture are both Jewish creations, so the museum would not out itself and the other by disparaging the latter with such a statement.

The quote you cite in fact comes from art critic Roger Kimball, who was commenting in 1990 about the 1988 MOMA catalogue. The 1988 MOMA catalogue actually wrote THIS about Deconstructivist architecture:

“Deconstructivist architecture disturbs figures from within…It is as if some kind of parasite has infected the form and distorted it from inside…The alien is an outgrowth of the very form it violates.”

It is almost as telling as the Kimball quote, as it somewhat covertly describes the Derrida virus. But, as Nikos Salingaros writes, MOMA via the catalogue “denies any connection between the architectural style and Derrida’s philosophy.” (See Nikos Salingaros, “Anti-architecture and Deconstruction: The Triumph of Nihilism”(2010).)

I can’t help but feel a tickle of amusement when the Sophists pull out their own “intellectual rigor” and always play the same semantic shell game – “well it’s not actually doctrine, but…”

Good to see you saying that the Pope, (indeed the Antichrist, where all the sin of the world emanates from – especially modernism realized as the merging and exaltation of pagan ideals (!) into Catholic doctrine to become secular humanism, Social Teaching, and globalism – teaching pagans, not Christ and the cross, but just “to be a nice guy cause you can’t be in the boys club while we build another Babel”) has no authority when you say that something like “Luemn Gentium 16” is not actually a Romanist teaching (of course, it outright contradicts John 14:6) even though decreed by the Vicar of Christ himself (I’m sure you know what vicar means in Latin). Even this one issue alone, as much as the Sophists try to skirt around it, as they are wont to do, especially when it comes to the cross, completely undermines the authority of the Pope, which is in fact none, so it’s great to hear it so directly from such a staunch defend of the Catholic faith. The whole Catholic faith rest on the infallibility of the Pope, but schismatics, such as yourself, a heretic in their eyes on par with the Reformers!, who question his authority completely undermine him.

Hopefully, this short comment will push you, God willing, towards closer meditation and study of God’s Word, above that of the rules of men, so that you may be found fully in Christ and in His Word – but lest we forget what Christ said when quoting the Prophet Isaiah:

“These people honor me with their lips,
but their hearts are far from me.
They worship me in vain;
their teachings are merely human rules.”

Hulkamania wrote:

Papism is not universalist. True universalism is the recognition of all particularities in their interconnectedness, not the elimination of all particularities and distinctions through relentless abstraction.

By definition, the Catholic Church is a universal church: one church, containing multitudes (even different, separate rites, such as the Byzantine rite), but unified under the pope. Catholic Universalism (mentioned by E. Michael Jones in his opening paragraph) on the other hand almost always refers to the doctrine introduced by Origen: that everyone is saved. Universalism is a sentimentalist position, not a dogma of the Catholic Church and is nowhere taught in Scripture. It was never taught to the faithful (at least not prior to 1970). So Hulkamania ‘s opening paragraph is a wrong turn into oblivion,

Hulkamania’s 2nd, 3rd and first part of his 4th paragraphs are philosophical nonsense unless he could actually connect it to Catholic Dogmatic teachings which he doesn’t——a sharper turn into oblivion.

Hulkamania then wrote:

That is why papists say, with all honestly, that they worship the same god as Muslims or Jews: because they all worship the same conceptual understanding of god. This is also known as the “god of the philosophers.”

Of course Hulkamania couldn’t produce Catholic doctrine justifying this if his life depended on it. However, after the Vatican II Council the new Vatican II Church did make the heretical claim that salvation can be had via other faiths.

Hulkamania continues:

For example, if you look at the famous “five proofs” for god from Thomas Aquinas, none of these “proofs” are proofs for the Christian God. They are “proofs” for this general and conceptual “god of the philosophers,” so they apply equally well to the god of Muslims, the god of pagan philosophers, the “first mover,” or even to Satan.

More grasping at straws. Aquinas’s five proofs are philosophical musings and not part of Catholic Dogma/Doctrine. That is, they are certainly interesting but irrelevant to the Catholic faith. Furthermore for us Christians (which includes Aquinas) the Muslim god and the god of the Talmud bear no resemblance to the Holy Trinity; that is, they do not exist. How is it that we should be concerned about entities that are considered a priori non existent? Likewise for the god of philosophers who doubtfully has none of the characteristics of the Holy Trinity.

Hulkamania finally wrote:

This explains why the papist cult is so overtly Satanic. Satan is the king of abstraction. The elimination of distinctions is the core of Satanism. This is because with enough abstraction, anything can become equal and the same as anything else. In this way, Satan can be equal to and the same as God.

Argument by bald assertion is practically useless.

You are one of the few who have correctly figured out E. Michael Jones.

I would agree that Jones in his opening paragraph uses the word “universalism” in the theological sense. While “catholic” is a synonym for “universal,” “universalism” in the theological sense was condemned by the Catholic Church. Why is it that Jones, the “Catholic Intellectual of this Century,” seems unaware of that fact?

After falling away from membership in the Catholic Church in his youth Jones returned after it had fully transmogrified into the Vatican II Church (1970). The Vatican II “popes” enforcement and application of the new Vatican II Constitutions became ambivalent to the Four Last Things (Death, Judgment, Heaven and Hell). That is, the Vatican II church began teaching that membership in the Vatican II church was not the only faith leading to salvation. The Vatican II church also formally accepted Lutherian Justification which teaches that every person who professes faith in Christ is saved regardless of their behavior. Lutherian Justification is a form of theological universalism.

Luther’s attack on the Catholic Papacy was largely ad hominem with little substance. Luther (an apostate Catholic priest) denigrated the authority of the Papacy and taught his followers that every man and women of reasonable intelligence were their own biblical authority. Unfortunately Luther himself saw the detrimental results of his invented doctrine: many of his growing number of followers were keeping their own council on the meaning of Scripture leading to harmful behavior. Luther saw himself as the super authority and attempted to rein his followers in but to no avail—-Luther taught that each of them was their own authority.

Luther also wrote that his invented doctrine of “Justification” lead to equally bad behaviors throughout Europe. Yet Luther had encouraged such bad behavior. He had encouraged the members of his Lutherian faith to sin early and often because their salvation was guaranteed. Luther plunged Europe into 30 years of war and destruction. Lutherian historians have admitted as much about all this

Thousands of Protestant sects—who today still praise Luther—have nonetheless placed their head councils in place of the Papacy. Instead of one, universal, Christian leader professing and teaching what Jesus and His Apostles taught we have thousands of Protestant leaders teaching their sect members some different doctrines.

Jesus stated clearly and unequivocally that, upon this rock I will build My Church.” Of course Jesus was referring to Peter. And the Catholic Church has had an unbroken succession of Popes leading directly from Peter. Jesus chose Peter as his successor on Earth—-the Vicar of Christ. This title is founded on the words of the Divine Shepherd to St. Peter: “Feed my lambs… Feed my sheep” (John, xxi, 16, 17), by which He constituted the Prince of the Apostles guardian of His entire flock in His own place, thus making him His Vicar and fulfilling the promise made in Matt. xvi, 18, 19. Luther and future Protestant theologians have no good reply. Luther saw the detrimental effects of making everyone a “pope.” Yet he admitted at the time that he believed himself to be the uber authority, but he had already let the genie out of the bottle. And today the head of each Protestant sect has effectively set themselves up as plenary “pope” of their own sect.

Here’s an easy way to see EMJ is not entirely in good intellectual faith: He has claimed Americans, having lost their original ethnic roots, have organized into new ethnic identities along religious, not racial, lines: namely: Protestants, Catholics, and Jews.

As proof, he quotes the Triple Melting Pot theory paper, which is based on marriage rate data. Marriage rate data is excellent to assess how ethnic groups are forming. There’s a hitch: that study does not cover Latinos or Blacks, at all.

Here’s grok’s description:
https://x.com/i/grok/share/mkjSMBeY89gW2NRAS4z8D410q
“The Triple Melting Pot theory, introduced by Ruby Jo Reeves Kennedy in the 1940s and later expanded by sociologists like Will Herberg and Milton Gordon, posited that intermarriage patterns in the United States among European immigrant groups were coalescing around three primary religious lines: Protestant, Catholic, and Jewish. This framework suggested that ethnic boundaries within these religious groups were eroding over generations, leading to a “tripartite” structure of assimilation. Your question asks whether extending this study to include present-day marriage data, incorporating both white and black populations, would still show a similar tripartite outcome.
Historical Context of the Triple Melting Pot
Kennedy’s original study, based on data from New Haven, Connecticut, observed that ethnic intermarriage rates among European Americans (e.g., Irish, Italian, German) were increasing within religious categories but not across them. For instance, Irish Catholics were more likely to marry Italian Catholics than Protestant Germans. The theory didn’t explicitly include race, focusing primarily on white ethnic groups, as black Americans and other racial minorities were largely excluded from the analysis due to segregation and social barriers at the time.”

He knows this, and still he keeps quoting the same study.

He’s a very seasoned intellectual, so he knows what he’s doing. What is he doing? It seems he’s trying to make the world conform to racial blindness by gaslighting everyone into believing it already is.

He has also suggested mass Filipino migration to Japan, as replacements. That is, he seems to be fine with Catholic masses reshaping non-Catholic peoples.

His seems to be a program of universal Catholicism at any cost. Erasing a local culture may not even tally as a cost for him, since he has claimed ethnic identity is religion+language+that’s it.

He reminds me very strongly of Colonel Nicholson, Alec Guinness’s character in “Bridge on the River Kwai,” diligently and obliviously working for his enemies, towards their satanic, pressure-cooked, one government world.

He’s whiter than Nick Fuentes, am I right??

Its good to see E Michael Jones fighting back against the exploitation of his faith.

But the larping Jew wins.

Jones’s instincts are right to fight back. He just doesn’t have the rhetorical ability.

E. Michael Jones is a Vatican II church member and as such follows the “doctrines” and heresies emanating from the Vatican II Constitutions. The heresies of the Vatican II Constitutions are an over-riding break with the previous 1900 years of Church history and doctrine. So the Vatican II Church has broken with Apostolicity and is therefore neither Catholic nor Universal. Provost is a product of the Vatican II Constitutions that brought us the disastrous Bergoglio papacy; a pope which Provost has praised and not disputed. About all this Jones is utterly silent.

Among other things E. Michael Jones is principally focused in his intellectual career on the effects of human events on Culture. To the man with only a hammer everything looks like a nail. So the title of Jones’s piece, its opening paragraph, its connecting paragraphs and his concluding paragraph are almost wholly about Provost’s cultural makeup and NOT whether he has taught or will teach what Jesus and his Apostles after Him taught. Nevertheless Jones feels confident to conclude about Provost that

Logos trumped ethnos, if by that we mean race, as it always does in the universal church.

I have no doubt that Provost will faithfully continue with Bergoglio’s legacy of following the heresies contained in the Vatican II Constitutions. If this were not the case he would never have been elevated to Cardinal. Finally it is the Vatican II Church which came to agreement with Protestants over the correctness of Lutherian Justification—a doctrine made up from whole cloth by Luther not Logos. And so the conclusion to be drawn is that the Vatican II heresies trump Logos and race.

I have made not said anyting else but that humans are of one race. The human species if you like. It atters twissl whetherone uses humans as one race of humans the species.

But you are reinforcing my point — humans despitre their skin color or biological traits ae one common species among many. Context: on this site when people speak of races they generally mean a catehorical dist

You seem to be making a disagreement where none exists.

The disagreement is on the point in which jews were designated as unique or specifically chosen by God as a blessing to be a light of God. It is not at the Exodus. It’s the Abrahamic covenant.

—————-

Now I am unclear why you insist on dragging me into a discussion about Mr Cayce. Who the Jews are is very specific and it does not start at the exodus. Scripture also references that a Jew is a jew of the heart. Meaning one can be a jew by following the the scipture and believing the same. As adoption bu choice.

I won’t engage in any discussion about Me Cayce and host beliefs about the soul or Christ.

—————-

There is nothing in scripture that suppirts that skin color or biology bars one from becoming a jew or a christian.

“The spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh weak.”
“To set the mind on the flesh is death, but to set the mind on the Spirit is life and peace.”

EliteCommInc,

“Race: human beings”

Human beings are not the definition of race.
A human being is a species.
Race is a category of that species.

Race cannot be a human construct because it exists without any notion of being conceived.

Just as a tree is not a human construct.
The tree exists whether any human conceives of it or not.

I brought Edgar Cayce into the discussion because he had a lot to say about the different races.

From Cayce’s point of view it’s about human bodies being avatars for the soul to experience the material world.

Cayce: “You don’t have a soul. You are a soul. You have a human body as a temporary shell for the soul.”

Cayce’s story of creation, short version:
All souls created at the same time.
“LET THERE BE LIGHT” God creating man (souls).
Somebody (not clear who) comes up with a new way of living. The material world.
[Drunvalo Melchizedek claims it was Lucifer.]

God tells man not to project his consciousness into the material world.
Man disobeys God and goes into the material world through “thought projection”. This is the original sin. The “Fall of Man”.

Man gets trapped in the material world and in the “cycle of karma”. The material bodies devolve to a point that the consciousness of man forgets who he is. Where he came from. And any notion of God. (The Caveman)
One soul “Emilius”, who apparently led the fall, at some point, in cooperation with God creates new bodies for the soul of man to incarnate into.
“LET US MAKE THEM IN OUR OWN IMAGE”. God and Amelius creating the new Adamic bodies. 5 Adams at the same time for 5 separate root races.
Each representing one of the 5 senses.
Whites – seeing
Asians – hearing
Blacks – instant gratification of desires

Different experiences, different challenges, for souls depending on their development.
One might say the incarnation into a black body is the most difficult to master. The goal being to embrace the “Christ Consciousness” ( thinking like God) and avoid sin.

Amelius the soul, after 33 incarnations finally achieves the Christ Consciousness in the human body “Yeshua” that we call Jesus.

Cayce was asked if races should mix?
He said, “No, they would revert back by the 4th or 10th generation anyway.
(No clue what that means.)
But the implication is that the races are separate for a reason that helps the souls move forward towards the Christ Consciousness.

In the Edgar Cayce story of Jesus, the same soul that occupied the human body Jesus also occupied the human body or bodies “Adam”. And Joseph in the story of saving Egypt from famine was Amelius.
Melchizedek also Amelius. Came into being without parents because they were writing some important things down and getting it wrong.

And Amelius was the one in Egypt that planned and built the pyramids.

All culminating in the crucification and resurrection.
Cayce said God could not save man from the spirit world. It had to be accomplished from within the material world.
Sort of implying that God intervened by going into the material world through the soul “Amelius” to save us.

Cayce also said that Amelius (Jesus) has the intentention to leave no soul behind.

The Cayce material, over 14,000 readings is probably among the most important information Man has. And it is hidden in plain sight by ignoring it.

So the obvious question, is it important to keep the races separate and pure blood?
Based on the Cayce readings the answer is yes. But not clear as to why.

If we loose the pure bloods, can we return? Or will mankind forever more, be a mixed race world of mutts.

I believe that is exactly what the Jews currently are. A mixed race, group of “Heinz 57’s” that have interbred for generations.
In animal husbandry that technique produces mixed results.
Some really spectacular offspring from inbreeding but more often, widespread physical and mental pathologies.

EdgarCayce.org

In this lecture (link below ) from 1919 Rudolph Steiner claims that mankind has passed the point where race or tribes are necessary.

https://rsarchive.org/Lectures/AhrDec_index.html

I would add this caveat about Nationality —- that is a legal status and every country has rules about who they woud classify as citizens, despie how they conduct themselves as would be citizens. Being born in a country is not be definion a grant of citizenship.

When I say “the matter” I am speaking abou Jews/Henrews a choesen people to carry ouy out a mission. Thet’s the covenant with Abraham. T”the chosen people” occurs. here are debates about the exodus, partingof the red sea, I won’t get into those. But the exodus is not the point at which the jew/Hebrews were established.

No comment on Cayce’s claims or flouride in water.

Race: human beings

Adapations of race: height, hair color, skin color, mass, etc.

Etnicity/Nationality: variatios all created by the minds of humans based on any number of factors

But skin color, like hair, and hieght does not determine either ethnicity or nationality they are all assigned buy humans.

—————-

If a thousand black africans have babies and raise them in according to the various african customs ort nationality and ethos — then one could say that that said children are black and African. But if te sam 1000 couples raise their children in Greece, according to Greek customs and national etghos they will be Grecians.

And even this, someone born of Scottish lineage but raised in the US, say, South Carolina upon moving to Scotland is not Scottish, despite the biologcal link. Onecan adjust etnicity, ethos, nationality, but skin colod minus some biological interference —

is what t is and whether ypu are Chinese and white, chinese and green, English and blue, Emglish and brown . . . one may not alway be chinese, english but one willaways be said color regardless of the other factors.

Elite CommInc

“I think the matter starts with Abramic Covenant, not the Exodus.”

Well, it certainly doesn’t match the official story. But I wasn’t there so I don’t know.

There is a book, “Tutankhamun: The Exodus Conspiracy” Andrew Collins and Chris Ogilvie-Herald.

The authors tell the story of Howard Carter who discovered king Tut’s tomb.
Carter threatened to reveal the truth about the papyrus found in the tomb.

This was a critical time for the Jews.
Behind the scenes much was happening to secure Palestine for a return of the Jews.

The rumor is that the story in the papyrus is different from the Bible.
In the papyrus, the Hebrew were kicked out of Egypt for the same old reasons.

The story in the Ringing Cedars series claimed it was all staged by the Egyptian priests. They came up with a plan to control the world by brainwashing a group of the “unclean” and then spreading them around the world. The story involved the priests having possession of esoteric information that enabled them to live very long lives.
It has one thing in common with the Bible.
It’s hard if not impossible to verify.

Bye the way Edgar Cayce was asked how to extend life and maintain a youthful body. He said keep the pineal gland active through prayer and meditation.
About 20 years ago it was revealed through autopsies that flouride collects in the pineal gland and calcifies it. Rendering the pineal gland inactive.
It’s been added to the water for decades. Coincidence?

Your comment about race depends on the definition.
One thing is for sure. If 1000 black African couples have babies, they will all be black Africans.
Same for whites, Arabs, Asians, etc..
Not scientific? Actually in my opinion better than “scientific”.

What’s more likely? We evolved from a lightening strike in a primordial mud puddle. Or these human bodies were designed to be far superior to the caveman bodies and we are slowly devolving again?

Dat Pope ass nigga, dat coon ass, he ain’t be whyte.

Ereybody can see.

Jesus condemned Jew U$ury in his first recorded public sermon, so the Jew U$urers immediately tried to kill him, and three years later they got the Romans to do it for (((them))).

Luke 4:16-30,

vatican.va/jubilee_2000/magazine/documents/ju_mag_01031997_p-22_en.html

search “remission of debts” and “led him to the cross”, check my recent comment history here at Unz.com.

Look at the history of Congressional districts in the North East and Midwest. The GOP was very influential even dominant in the area up until then. At the time, GOP was synononomous with Protestant communities which were the majority in the area and even remain so in many parts of the region.

But starting in the 1960s, especially by 1965, one can literally see the wholesale slaughter of the GOP in those districts in the North East and Midwest.

Almost all were replaced by Papists, especially Democrat Papists.

This occurred in the 1960s because the Yankee elite which dominated the GOP back then, went publicly and politically along with the Papist policies, especially those enunciated by JFK. They did this because the Yankee Elite was neck deep as an accomplice to the Judeo-Papist criminal combine erected during the 1920s. For every Al Capone, Meyer Lansky, or Kennedy bootlegging liquor and narcotics there was a Yankee facilitating the logistics, especially the judicial protection and financing. The Papists called in their chits regarding the 1960s Prog policies they pushed in return for not exposing this history and allowing the Yankees to reserve some for their Capital Wealth and Academic Body to themselves.

But by abandoning their previous Yankee ethnic-sectarian stances, and advancing the Papists Civil Rights, Immigration, and progressive social values of the Kennedy era, these Yankee Protestant Republicans lost all legitimacy with their own base. This occurred at the same time just as the Papist electorate was increasing in the area. The result was the break up of the GOP esrablishment and the elimination of the Yankees from much of the power structure in North East in the 1960s-1970s and their reduction in power in the corporate capitalist class.

Today, White shitlibs/progs are predominantly of Papist not Yankee Puritan origin. One will notice their attacks are almost exclusively from the rol down. It is rarely against the remaining upper class Yankees. Nonetheless, this also created an opening as the ill effects of these liberal-left policies soon became evident to much of the majority both Protestant and Papist. The reaction were movements like the so called White Nationalist movement, which had an opportunity to show those shitlib policies were damaging not just to all Whites, but especially the Anglo-Protestants.

In keeping with their numerical majority and core beliefs of the general White American population, most WN numbers were Protestants. Yet, it was the Yankee Puritans as an ethno-sectarian class that many of the WN leadership first went after. They did this because they were Papist and it served their political ethno-sectarian interests to seize control of a movement which then and up to this day is majority Protestant.

However, the incessant anti-Puritan WASPism of the movement started turning off to many of its Anglo-Protestant followers, so the Papist leadership switched to pushing Anti-Semitism. Today, the ethno-sectarian consciousness of the Anglo-Protestants, especially those in the South jmjas increased to such an extent that the Papists are in overdrive covering up their past lead in destroying White America by doubling down on “Duh, Jews.”

The fact is we could get rid of Jews, but not much will change. The reason, is because Jews are not just miniscule in number and smaller in overall wealth control compared to the Papists, but because most of the problems we have stem from the core belief system of the Papists. They not only pushed Civil Rights as a means of breaking up the Protestant ascendancy based as it as on segregation and free association, but also as a means of seizing its real estate. Vast areas of the North’s niddle and upper class, and in even working class neigjborhoods were excluded from Papist ownership. Breaking this up, not only opened them up to non-Whites, but especially to non-Protestants, most particularly Papists.

The Southern protestants shared the same predilection to exploit labor as the Northern Yankees, prior to the civil war the black slave population was growing faster than the free white population. The post-war accord between the Southern aristocracy and Yankee elite was mended by their mutual interests in exploiting poor whites. The Hart-Cellar Act was passed due to the mutual protestant interest to keep wages low in tandem with the jewish interest to deracinate the population, an example of the parasitic synthesis of Yankee/Southern protestantism and judaism.

By the way, JFK was merely acting within the framework taught to him by the WASP establishment. Whatever grievance you have with his policy should instead take root in the education given to him by the protestant yankee culture and not Catholicism. Even with this handicap he summoned enough courage to stand up for American interests against jewish interests, enough to get him assassinated in fact. Along with Forrestal and Traficant, he was an example of American Catholic fortitude in face of jewish subversion. What protestant politician has shown the same amount of courage?

False. Each item blamed on duh Jews was pushed thru by Papists, followed by a close second of Big Business Yankee Rockefeller types, and then a distant third place of Jews. One can review the owner records of media at the time and compare their coverage to see who had the most push.

Take the example of immigration:

Immigration Act of 1965 was pushed thru by Papists, followed by a close second of Big Business Yankee Rockefeller types, and then a distant third place of Jews. One can review the owner records of media at the time and compare their coverage to see who had the most push.

At the time, the media was dominated by Prods, Papists, Jews, and many were small independent owner operators. They were mostly kept in business by advertising, which was totally controlled by the Rockefeller syndicate. Overall, it was the Papists and Prods who had the most push. This is reflective in the Congressional voting records. All of the Papists, most of the Yankees, and a couple of Jews are who passed it. Southerners, some WASP Republicans, and slight majority of WASP Westerners opposed it.

Still, it was a Papist inspiration from the get go, and the culmination of ((Joseph Kennedy))’s lobbying which he had done for the previous three decades. At the time, Jews barely controlled any corporate boardroom outside of Hollywood, some media outlets, and a couple of investment firms during the years. In contrast Papists and Yankees dominated the corporate boardrooms.

Lastly, in the decades before Americans took back control of their government in the early 20th century, it was Papists and Robber Baron Prods like the Rockefellers who kept squishing attempts to control immigrarion between 1875-1925. Papist crime syndicates like that which controlled Tammany Hall in NYC, ensured only compromised Protestants could get elected in vast areas of the country during that era. So, even before Jews came here, brought by Papists and Tsarists btw, it was the Papists who were pushing for it. But to be honest, before them, it was greedy, little, crop eared, scumbag, Yankee labor contractors who brought the Papists from Ireland and Germany.

All of this happened long before “Duh, Jews.” You want to get rid of “Duh, Jews,” it will move the needle, but not by that much. At this point the country is awash with Papists insanity to such a level, I doubt we can escape it short of some 30 years Civil War like Germany experienced during the Wars of Religion. Blame it on the Yankees for bringing us to this point. Pointing at Duh, Jews, is just a cope.

Overall, if we got rid of the Papists, that is what would cause the most massive change. If you doubt that, take a look at those maps which show the results if only certain demographic groups voted. If only Papists voted, the results were only slightly better than if only Jews voted. But if only Protestants voted it would be one single rightwing series of governments from sea to shining sea. You put in Jews and Protestants only a couple of states like Massachusetts becomes slightly purple. But you add Papists and Protestants only, and the country looks hardly different than it does now. It’s the Papists who are the problem!

I’m saying it is the underlying logic and values of WASP culture that justify all of the abhorrent crimes committed against ordinary Americans. Why shouldn’t rich WASPs marry into jewish families while allowing unlimited third-world immigration to drive down wages. If the rich can live in isolated bubbles of wealth and leisure then why not let the public space be overrun by a horde of undesirables as long as you get yours. That is what Trump is doing, allowing in unlimited H1-Bs and illegals to drive down wages while taking advice from his homosexual jewish son-in-law, the father of his jewish grandchildren. Trump is the predatory WASP taken to its logical conclusion, a pseudo-jew willing to sell out his country and heritage in order to enjoy limitless vice provided by jews.

Using the moral framework of the WASPs, is it even possible to chastise such behavior? Please, before arguing with me at least provide an intellectual argument using a WASP moral framework to admonish such behavior. Is it even possible to move forward with a WASP mentality and not become a pseudo-jew like Trump?

I won’t speak to Mr Cayce’s faith and practice. Nor will I speak to his talents/abilities/claims as a psychic.

But based in what we know of human biology, there’s only one race of humans. There may be variations, adapatations, etc. But skin color does not make one human and another a nonhuman or something else.

I think that is where I stand on the issue. However, I found your comments interesting and certainly thought provoking. Where I came in on the issue of beimng a jew is where I remain. Though I acknowledge that humans are decesendants from another human being. As I understand the scripture. God is for all. That he tasked a particular group to embody his essence, existance and desired relationship with humans does not in any way diminish other humans, nor bar them from knowing him.

I think we agree.

—————-

My hope is that the current Pope will reiterate that while God is supreme. Laws regarding immigration are bound by two factors. Do they violate or bar one from obeying the qwill of God. A universal christianity does not dismiss national laws that do not bar the work of God and no christian in the US can make a claim that immigration laws bar them from being kind to strangers.
I hope will admonish the churches for abusing the sanctuary role of faith as a means to violate national laws.

Nothing and no one is barred from going to Mexico if they desire to share God’s word. And it is fact, abuse of more, a complete misunderstanding of the “Good Samaritan” story to use it to break laws that do not bar faith and practice. Being a christian or a jew or a muslim does not in effect, entitle aiding and abetting rthose who enter the country illegally. The good samaritan is not about the foreigner. It’s a tale about how one’s own people failed to render support to one of their own. Which is exactly how one treats citizens by entitling illegal immigrants status denied to the citizens in need.

It will be interesting to see how he tackles that matter.

Not to get into this WASP vs Catholic Jewy debate but whether you like or not it was the so called WASPS who did in FACT lay down the groundwork for building America that cannot be disputed. It wasn’t the negro, it wasn’t the Catholics (they would come later) and it damn sure wasn’t the kike or anyone else. The Catholics who arrived later were often Poles, Irish, Italian, etc., and let’s be real here, these groups brought some less than desirable traits with them like organized crime. Of course none of these groups came with the purposeful agenda of destroying this nation other than the Jew. Troll on, Saul.

To quote the eminent WASP academic Samuel P. Huntington, settlers are the ones who set the standard and form the national identity while all later immigrant groups merely assimilate into said construct. The WASP founders and leaders of America always shared a predatory character whether it was the founders exploiting the national debt to bleed the newly established republic’s citizenry dry, driving down wages using black slaves and european immigration, the Ford foundation bringing in jewish marxists to atomize the citizenry into easily exploitable economic units, exporting American industry to China to enrich jewish Wall Street who pays their protestant lackeys, and finally the HIAS under Mayorkas unleashing the migrant flood into a hollowed out USA.

Why do you keep on whining, isn’t this the inevitable conclusion of your values and first principles? All of the undesirables who inhabit America’s once great cities be they uppity ni**ers, obese blue-haired dykes, tatted-up “La Raza” thugs, and of course the jewish rentier class who acts as a parasite upon everyone all follow the WASP’s footsteps. Protestant culture sanctions and deifies the right to act on your passions and personal beliefs right? So the protestant leadership thought all of this horror was acceptable as long as they got rich and got to enjoy the high life, so what if their descendants would become sterile homosexuals who worship fur babies in lieu of children.

In your typically whiny screed you admit that your Catholic brother has six children, that’s six more white children than you have produced by your own criteria right? You are of the same cloth as the horde of undesirables I have alluded to earlier. You people are ignorant, selfish, prideful, weak, lazy, and all while simultaneously demanding of immense virtue to affect the change in society that you yourself cannot contribute to.

My brother is Catholic and so is his Italian wife. All 6 kids are Catholic as well. I have tried Catholicism but it just wasn’t my cup of tea. Too rigid, formal, etc., no feeling or emotion whereas when I tried some Pentecostal or Church Of God In Christ ( Pentecostal) churches they were a bit much. I haven’t been to ANY church in about 20 years because of ALL churches ignoring poor Whites while going out of their way to help non whites thousands of miles away and of course the over the top retarded worshipping Jews who absolutely loathe Christ and Christianity. AND both Protestant and Catholic Churches are also open to flooding our borders with non white rapeugees.

Celibacy is an unnatural condition for adult humans so it is expected that a certain percentage of celibates will violate their oaths. I have personally known two Catholic priests who had affairs with women in their parish, one of whom left the priesthood and married the woman, only to divorce her and return to the Church, again as a priest. Overcoming my hypersensitivity to the feelings of others, I told him the Church must be pretty desperate for priests. He agreed, but accused me of being a “male slut.”

Probably less than half of one % of adult males are sexually attracted to pre-pubertal children, but since this is so repulsive, every public disclosure is a bombshell. There are quite a few Catholics in my family, mostly Italians, and I have no animosity toward the Church. Still, humor must be taken from any source.

The Grand Chamberlain to the Whore’s Throne in Rome, was an Irish American and was rumored as a potential pick along with Cardinal Burke. Indeed, Irish American Papists dominate the Whore’s Church here in America. But, they never get any true respect from her church due to long, long, long old school Guido Greaseball shiite. Nontheless, an American (sort of) was picked Pope. But as a mixed race part Black, he won’t be leading any Papist led White Nationalist movement.

You see, the Whore prefers Italian Papists, not Irish Papists, and the Italians, being good pimps, like their Whores. They don’t want to share. I mean its like what happened to the few non-Italian Popes we had recently. Both were almost assassinated and one was actually removed from the Whore’s throne forcefully. And woah to the Italian that becomes friends with non-Italians. Its like the same problem Henry Hill and James Burke had with their Sicilian friend Tommy Desimone in the Mob. So Pope Leo XIV should be careful he doesn’t get too cozy with the non-Italians.
https://youtu.be/bJhHxzvO6TE?si=O7P96A6Bnx8tQ7MB
Video Link

I am afraid you will have to supprt this notion. It never mentions race. It does say, not marry unbelievers. Interesting to note that in belief Jews are opactice the same.

Oddly enough, both christianity and jusaism address some nuances of that dynamic.

as far as your comments regading your national and ethnic categories. I am afraid that history reeks havoc on your position. Not only is there no prohibition in scriptre regarding national or ethnic diffrences to marriage — Eurpeans actually encouraged such unions for various reasons:

peaceful coexistence, financial relations, alliances . . .etc., apparently even love. Scripture does not bar any such unions.

“In book 6, chapter 6, out of nowhere comes a story on the origin of the Jews.
An Egyptian priest rounds up the dregs of society, marches them around in the wilderness for 2 generations and convinced them they are God’s chosen people. The people who come out of the wilderness have a totally different identity from those that went in, 2 generations earlier.

“I think the matter starts with Abramic Covenant, not the Exodus.

IF this Pope has any Nigra blood it is a drop IF that AND (((Wikipedia))) says this guy was born and raised in the Chicago area so who came up with this Creole shit? IF anything this Pope is a crypto Jew.

Unfortunately, there is some truth to that one. Not Catholic but I don’t want to fall for the divide and conquer. Pedophiles in all religions but it seems the Catholics are pretty near the top.

No idea, but the agreement (and reason for the agreement) was until the Russian Army had left the bases they had there, to prevent any type of accident ending in war, so even if there currently is, they’ve still complied with the agreement

I’m not disagreeing with your point per se, but you can’t put aside what was said when Putin has been claiming it time and time again as his casus belli.

NATO was never going to invade Russia and was bordering on irrelevant until this war happened. If he genuinely believes NATO is an existential threat to Russia (I don’t believe for one second he believes it) then congratulations, he now has the entire Baltic peninsula now in it

FolkeneMine,

“Vedic”?

Are you aware of “The Ringing Cedars” series of books?

Eight books totalling 2400 pages by Russian author Vladimir Megre.
Megre claims, that on a 1996 trip up the Taiga River in Siberia, he met a beautiful woman named Anastasia.
She gives him a different history of Russia that involves the Vedic people of Russia before Christianity.

In book 6, chapter 6, out of nowhere comes a story on the origin of the Jews.

An Egyptian priest rounds up the dregs of society, marches them around in the wilderness for 2 generations and convinced them they are God’s chosen people. The people who come out of the wilderness have a totally different identity from those that went in, 2 generations earlier.

The premise is that Anastasia is trying to influence the future of Russia, after the collapse of communism.
Anastasia advises Russians to reject the lifestyle of the west, namely consumerism. And turn back to the Vedic culture of the past. Not to reject technology but to live a more balanced life with nature. And particularly rejecting modern processed foods.

After reading the entire series I came to believe it was subtly attempting to undermine Christianity.
But my God what a story.

The Canadian translator, upon translating book 6 to English, said it was hard to believe a human wrote the material.

In my opinion it’s better to get ahold of a set of the first printing to avoid changes in the story.
They are easy to find on eBay.

https://www.ringingcedarsofrussia.org/Main/English/index.php

Christianity can be summed up in a few sentences.

“Love God with all your heart and soul. Love your neighbor as yourself.”

Or as Jesus said, “Love each other as I have loved you.”

Everything else in the Bible from beginning to end is trying to explain that

Forgiveness is the key.
Christianity is really centered around forgiveness. It’s a very powerful force.
It typically benefits the one doing the forgiving more than the forgiven.

It’s not possible to maintain LOVE without forgiveness because everyone will eventually “trespass against you”.

So what part of Christianity, the religion of “Love and Forgiveness”, do you reject?

EliteComminc

“..what constitutes a Jew.”
The question of the ages.
Is it a race? Is it a culture?
Is it defined by the mother’s mitochondria?
Is it a simply a system of belief,
a mistake?

What is a human body? A temporary shell for the soul? If so then you don’t have a soul. You are a soul. You HAVE a human body.

The noted psychic and lifelong Christian Sunday school teacher Edgar Cayce, said there were five root races, that he called the Adamic races. They came after the caveman era.
Superb human bodies compared to what came before.
No silly evolution myth.
As Madam Blavatsky said about the theory of evolution, “It’s just the opposite. The human bodies started out perfect and are devolving downward.”

Cayce said the human body is the most brilliant creation in the material world.

And maybe it’s true, 65 trillion cells all working together like a symphony orchestra when healthy. And each cell a universe unto itself.

Five root races that correspond with the 5 senses of the human body.
And necessary for soul development.
In other words, God didn’t screw up and evolving monkeys have nothing to do with it.

Bye the way Edgar Cayce said that “Israel” – Is-Ra-El, refers to all of us. The collective souls of man, created by God. The Jews seem to have that slight detail wrong.
A very important question, “What is a Jew”? Because the diaspora including the citizens of Israel (nation) have become such a powerful force that it is essentially, a weapon.

EdgarCayce.org

In a 1919 lecture given in Switzerland by Rudolph Steiner the subject of tribe and race is briefly addressed. Steiner at that early time claimed that the division of the races would become unnecessary as the collective souls, mankind, evolved.

Steiner also perfectly describes the future that we live in today with advanced technology potentially used to trap the soul of man in the material world.
Translated from 19th century German and includes esoteric spiritual concepts so can be difficult to keep up with:

https://rsarchive.org/Lectures/AhrDec_index.html

Not at all. I am keenly aware that the reality of skin color is not the system we live in. The system we operate in has elevated skin color to a place so unreal as to boggle the mind. It has boggled our entire socety perhaps societies is a better understanding.

The heirarchy of skin color plagues the US and starts before the founders, uet the fpounders who knew better wholly adopted and practiced the myth of whiteness by definition better. Despite the contradictory evidence. As a conservative, its hard to really challenge the liberal mind bending reality so out of real world experience because the founders did likewise.

Here’s the compounded error. Blacks are slaves and therefor not people, but we can certainly count them as a nober of votes. Huh? Forget about how te rfest of the world had slaves, and some whites and native americans were slaves to, and the first slave owner was black. All of these obfiscations all to hide and at the same embrace the notion of white superiority. And clearly yellows and brown are eiter supportive or eager to chomp on the bit that they are really the superior ones. In the US browns and yellows don’t really have to identify skin tone, they get to ebrace so e cultural perspective and skip the color coding altogether. Expedience to get and keep a leg up.
Farmers across the midwest are screaming foul subsidies were cut and yet these same farmers had a hostile respo0nse when black farmers sought the same subsidies.

Hispanics and whites embrace Ceasar Chavez, the great spokes man farm laborer. No. Che only fought on behalf of browns from Mexico. The blacks who migrated west from slavery having been descendents of agriculture for hundreds of years were cut out of that support. Mexicans here illegally love to jump on the white bandwagon, which is why much to my surprise in 1993/94 I read in surveys that hispanics always note white on job applications. They know who gets teh easy in or easier in — deserved or not – sight unseen. The mid 90’s was my coservative wake up call. The sloganeering simply did not match the data.

Sure there are blacks who are no good, bad people, etc. None of that changes our socialization around skin color. And most of it has been bad form. Damaging not only to others, but to ourselves as a nation. The US needs every citizens prepped and ready. And its a mistake to somehow discount 13% of the population because of black skin. Black males put on the trousers and black women obsess about their shoes and whites of both sexes.
——-

as for the Pope rfegardless of skin color there are certain rhings the Catholic faith and practice cannot endorse despite the color differences. As for me, Laugh, consider me a jew if you like — but Jews can no more endorse same relational conduct anymore than the Pope at least according to the Pentatuch- tghe ultimate definer of what constitutes a Jew.

While the Jew is picking your pocket the Catholic priest
is bending you over.

You are totally …
in the head.

This is very, very illuminating. And just further proof as well for me of the importance of seeing women/men as a dynamic between sacred feminine/masculine. The Germans Tacitus wrote of were inspiring in their monogamous devotions.

100%

There are a lot of nonsensical comments pervading social media that Christianity is responsible for the wonders and conveniences and beauty – of the “modern” world – of the last some 500 years. No. It’s EUROPEAN Christianity. Which is to say, it’s not Christianity at all. I’d think it’s worth arguing Europeans succeeded in spite of Christianity – not because of it. I could wish any of these Christians of the rabid or gentler type alike would bother investigating the Vedas, “pagan” European thoughts, or even just the simpler bits of European history such as the Magna Carta, or the virtues of strict monogamy among Germanic peoples.

All that said, White unity – and I will support all of my Christian White family, until they begin to advocate Universalism – which seems to me to be blatantly anti-Nature, per Arthur Keith:

“He who feels generous towards his enemy, and more especially if he feels forgiveness towards him, has in reality abandoned the code of enmity and so has given up his place in the turmoil of evolutionary competition. Hence the benign feeling of perfect peace that descends on him.”

You juden are truly insane.

This makes no sense.

You have yet to meet the burden. Deminstrate that whites are a Unique entty by skin alone. That’s the case you are making that skin toan biology matters.

And while I certainly need to check my tech in m commentimng. I am unclear where the logic failure occurs. I understand that there are social benefits from a Pope being claimed as black. It’s always good to get that color monkey off one’s back, as if it that easy. But when I look at the pope he is white.

I reject that nonsensical standard of gthe one drop rule adopted by blacks and whites — it make no sense and has no real value in iteself.

I am not confused in the least. Sure, there is a European culture comprised of multiple cultures. But it is a mistake in my view, to make any claims that being born white automatically gives rise to that culture.

A white kid in Montana is not going speak french merely because his parents were french. Whites in the US are related to most of Europe. However, Louisiana french gulf speak is going to a foreign language to a French person — a white Cagian is not anymore French than a white Strasbergian.

The Pope is white because he looks white. Whether white or black, most influence for US citizens is European. Period. White skin has nothing to do with it — save this. We in gthe west have made whiteness a moral, educational and religious factor for the purpose of self value and value to that hegemony. But if speak to a brown skinned woman born and raised in Scotland, Chances are she is going to sound and think like other Scotts.

There are brown and black Italians, to suggest that their dark skin somehow disenfranchises them is a mistake. Are whiteness, browness, good better best understanding is one of anufacture, not one of genetics.

—————

White skin in Europe is not one choice, but happenstance. And I going to challenge your suggestion that you mention it only to categpry.

I mentioned “White” only in the context of the “White, Christian European Civilization”
as a distinct entity which was the object of Talmudic malevolence for a thousand years.
By taking “White” out of context you are confusing yourself, but not me.

Immerse yourself in instructional materials in disputation and logic and get back to me
in a year or two. I trust that this is condescending enough to dispatch you elsewhere.

Laugh.

Uhhhhh . . . as you like.

Jewish pilpul.

Oyyyyy and Good Gooly Miss Molly and Holy Moses . . .

I am not making any admissions to any faith and practice as they are not relevant to this discussion. I simply stated if it aids you in believing I am a this or a that — that is ok by me. It does not mean that I am a this or a that. Your press on yhis issue is a sideshow to obscure the failure to admit

1. color is not bound to any conduct be definition

2. And the discussion is irrelvant

3. Unless you can demonstrate the relevance — it is not a weight I carry.

I am not hiding anything I am simply taking a position, one I have taken many times.

———————-

You are getting what is relevant at the moment — skin color, faith and practice are not.

Laughing

I appreciate the reminder to proof read.

Now to clarify:

Jews are nt any such thing merely because they are jews.

I generally, don’t pay much attentionto the Talmud when it comes to understanding what is meant being a jew fundamnetaly. The Talmudic expositions are attempts to address what is meant by certain old testament scripture.

If you want to reference a Talmudic exposition that ddresses skin color, I will certainly look at it.

Now again, if you want to reference a Talmudic passage that explicates whitesness or references white skin to morality, God or some othet attribute, I will certainly look at it.

But the Torah notr the OT in uts entirety does make skin color binding to being anything, That I am aware of.

Re: the spelling? Those aren’t errors. Those a Kabballah spells.

Race is EVERYTHING. Your stupid, stupefying, idiotic “religion” is the most degraded version of Judaism. The Abrahamic horrors are CANCER.

Jones you BLITHERING IDIOT – Shiloh Hendrix is ANYTHING but “White trash”. She’s a lovely young WHITE MOTHER, who defended herself and her child from robbery and harassment from a bulb-head Somalian NIGGER, who LIED. She’s also valiant and BRAVE and has done more in defense of the White Race THAN YOU AND YOUR CATHOKIKES EVER HAVE. (With the possible exception of Vlad Tepes).

Hendrix just released a shot video bringing her supporters up to date. She’s a LOVELY young woman and I regard her as an absolute credit to the White Race. I am so proud of her, her family, and everyone who supports her, you absolute pustulant TOAD.

The only “White trash” that exists are back-stabbing, feckless, treacherous ideologues like YOU, who care infinitely more about your STUPID, self-defeating “beliefs” than they do about REAL PEOPLE.

Something like Hogwarts with all the magical, mysterious stuff. Ghosts and other spirits both holy and unholy. (whatever that means). Heavenly reward, eternal life, but only after you croak.

A really bangup insurance policy. And all you need do is believe and be dunked. A genuine bargain.

“Exsurgat, Deus, et dissipentur inimici ejus et fugiant qui oderunt eum a facie ejus.” — Ps.67

I generally, don’t pay much attentionto the Talmud when it comes to understanding what is meant being a jew fundamnetaly

So now you are admitting to being a jew?

Since you “generally don’t pay much attention” meaning that you do pay some attention to it.

Why hide in the shadows, in tunnels and sewers?

Come forth into the light so we may see you.

To give IQ tests in Haiti you would first need to train Special Forces
in psychometric testing, Haitian French dialect and send them off
with a heavy bag of bribe money. But, persuading Elon Musk that
we might discover a goldmine of software architects might be tough.

In the interest of coherence and clarity, may I suggest a little attention
to sentence structure and the addition of spell check?

You don’t need to see yourself as a victim to ask the following:

1) Is whiteness a valid construct?
2) If so, is it threatened?
3) If so, is it worth protecting?
4) If so, what measures need to be taken to protect it?
5) Is it worth persuading other people that these measures need to be taken?

If a person sees the above as generally true, he need not hate and seek to harm all non-white groups. I think therefore that Kevin Barrett’s original comment presented something of a false dilemma.

Is the Pope Black? (colored)

Video Link

Dr. Jones, you mock the idea of IQ differences between races and you even laughed recently on your show when telling the story of a “white nationalist” who said Haitians have an average IQ of 75. You were in disbelief of the idea of giving IQ tests to Haitians and wondered what language were the tests given in.

Don’t you realize that you’re making the white nationalist’s argument if you can’t even imagine IQ tests administered in Haiti? Doesn’t that speak volumes? By laughing at the idea of giving an IQ test in Haiti, you made the white nationalist’s point!

(places a mirror in front of RUF) Who is projecting their Animus as well as pretending to be better informed than is actually the case?

Giulio Andreotti Prime Minister of Italy over seven governments was infamous for the number of his critics who died unnatural deaths, especially from being poisoned. It’s also possible that the Mafia committed most of their homicides in the US though I’m sure I could dredge up some statistics of their activities in Italy which would no doubt include their contributing to the unnatural death rate in Italy fairly recently. There may be many reasons Italy reports a low homicide rate: the obvious being they don’t publish the true statistics for fear of scaring away tourists. It could also be one unusually slow year for murders like during COVID lockdowns. Either way there’s an indisputable modern record of homicidal acts committed by Italians. Take your buffoonery elsewhere.

News are nt any such thing merely vecause they are jews.

I generally, don’t pay much attentionto the Talmud when it comes to understanding what is meant being a jew fundamnetaly. The Talmudic expositions are attemots to add4ss what is meant by certain old testament scriture.

If you want to refernce a Talmudic exposition that ddresses skin color, I will certainly look at it.

Mi hael Jackson whether by condition of some maner of treatment went from light brown to whote.

But that debate does not address whether skin color and ethnicity or culture are colond. They are not.

M Phillips,
Addendum:

J..D. Unwin and Why Sexual Morality May be Far More Important than You Ever Thought

https://www.kirkdurston.com/blog/unwin

……………………………………………………………….

“Sex and Culture” by J.D. Unwin (1934)

“According to Unwin, after a nation becomes prosperous it becomes increasingly liberal with regard to sexual morality and as a result loses it cohesion, its impetus and its purpose. The process, says the author, is irreversible:
“The whole of human history does not contain a single instance of a group becoming civilized unless it has been absolutely monogamous, nor is there any example of a group retaining its culture after it has adopted less rigorous customs.”

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/15707651-sex-and-culture

Anon 114
Homosexuality!
It all revolves around homosexuality.

It’s not possible to normalize homosexuality and maintain a society

J D Unwin studied 87 societies and wrote a 600 page book.
“Sex and Culture”

The more conservative the society is on sex the higher it will develop.

Normalizing deviant sex results in total collapse by the 3rd generation, with no exceptions.

J.D. Unwin and Why Sexual Morality May be Far More Important than You Ever Thought
https://www.kirkdurston.com/blog/unwin

Bella Dodd sounded the alarm 70 years ago. 20,000 communists joined the Catholic Church to sabotage it from within.
https://www.winterwatch.net/2024/05/bella-dodd-warned-of-diabolical-pederast-conspiracy-against-catholic-church/

Michael S. Rose documents the homosexual takeover of the church in his 2002 book, “Good Bye, Good Men:…”.
Two seminaries taken over by homosexual priests churning out dozens of more homosexual priests yearly.

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/424624.Goodbye_Good_Men

“The author documents this culture within the seminaries – one referred to as the “Pink Palace”, with gay priests and seminarians going to gay bars in the evening, inviting “friends” to stay over night, in some appalling cases underage boys. It was truly sickening to read. What is the tie between this gay subculture in the seminaries during this time and the priest sexual abuse scandal? Was it 100% the cause, …?

“He will be born of the gulf and unmeasured city,
Born of obscure and dark family:
He who the revered power of the great King
Will want to destroy through Rouen and Evreux.”

Nostradamus, Prophecies, V 84

At least 89 (5+84) cardinals needed to vote for Prevost in order for him to have become a pope.

He will be born of the gulf and unmeasured city – both of Chicago and New Orleans could be read as such
Born of obscure and dark family – it is now rather clear that his family was “dark”
He who the revered power of the great King – Augustians take their name from St. Augustine who took it from Augustus, the first Roman emperor aka “the great King”
Will want to destroy through Rouen and Evreux. – not sure what it is meant here ….\\

BTW, Leo was the favourite disciple of St. Francis….

Could anyone tells us where in the New Testament it is written that there should be a “pope”?

Was a pope ever mentioned in Jesus teachings?

Papacy is the continuity of the Roman emperors, the Catholic church based its structures on Rome ‘s organization throughout the provinces.

A pope is an emperor without an empire.

He has the influence we want to let him have.

This one, being what he is has zero influence.

Priss Factor,

“Who cares? Catholicism is a pedophile crytptohomo cult.”

Homosexuality is always destructive both to the individual and to the society.
https://www.kirkdurston.com/blog/unwin

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/15707651-sex-and-culture

Bella Dodd quit communism and said 20,000 communists had joined the church to destroy it from within.
This was in the 1930’s.

“Bella Dodd Warned of Diabolical Pederast Conspiracy Against Catholic Church”
May 27, 2024 Russ Winter

https://www.winterwatch.net/2024/05/bella-dodd-warned-of-diabolical-pederast-conspiracy-against-catholic-church/

In the book “Goodbye Good Men:…”
the author documents that homosexuals infiltrated the church and took over 2 seminaries churning out dozens of homosexual priests a year.

Goodbye, Good Men: How Liberals Brought Corruption into the Catholic Church
Michael S. Rose
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/424624.Goodbye_Good_Men

Dat Pope ass nigga ain’t white.

Oh! Pick me! Pick me! I know the answer everyone…

Logos! Logos is the answer!

What do I win?

Refer to the Talmud to understand the Jewish antipathy to White, Christian
European Civilization. The Jew parasite hates the host which sustained it.

I guess Michael Jackson was White then.

Wrong, being European descended is White.

And Jews are only partly and only some of them European descended.

Verdict= Not White

Oyyyyy . . .

Curious describe whte behaviorand white belief unique to all other humans of a differen shade.

Laugh.

Tracing ethnic geritage via DNA is not an indication about wthat thei skin color is.

Ethnitiy or cultire is not by definion skin color. The pope is a white.

Genesis 49:17

Hmm, the snake 🐍

A great deal of Italian mob activity was Jew pretending to be Italian.

Clearly the new “pope” Prevost is just another globalist stooge put in place by the same mafia who installed Bergoglio in power during the coup that ousted Benedict 16.

Since then, the papacy has endorsed pedophilia, wokism, lgbtism, it has also fully embraced the globalist cult of immigration-invasion open borders (but only in white countries), the ‘great reset’ and agenda 2030 (the 17 ‘sustainable goals to enslave humanity) and of course both Bergoglio and Prevost called Catholics to get injected with the covid deathvax.

Any Christian who still believe in this papacy is, well, how to put it nicely, very naive at best.

As many are now saying, it is not because a cartel of rotten cardinals have illegal chosen their new puppet pope, that Catholics have to accept him. Catholics should be the ones voting for the pope.

I propose Cardinal Vigano as Pope and demand the abdication of the fake pope Prevost.

Faith is fantasy, race is reality.

Detroit is full of Christian blacks. So is St. Louis and Baltimore.

Blacks are still black in their behavior.

While I don’t necessarily agree fully with you on this point on race, someone I respect was closer to your line of thinking. The greatest American Catholic writer ever, Thomas Merton. The Dalai Lama said Merton was his image of a “perfect Christian.”

But Merton was most certainly murdered, and at least one CIA agent admitted they killed him. This is an incredible interview by Hugh Turley.

Video Link

Kevin…you know need to have Hugh Turley on your show to discuss the assassination of Thomas Merton. He published the death photos 10 months ago for the first time. No better time to revisit this topic.

https://covertactionmagazine.com/2024/07/08/photographs-expose-thomas-merton-murder-cover-up/

A bowl of ravioli is hateful? It is written that
“a rat sees everything as poison.”