jedit-devel Mailing List for jEdit

Bugs item #2996066, was opened at 2010-05-03 14:29
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by donrhummy
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=2996066&group_id=588

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: normal bug
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: don Rhummy (donrhummy)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Application does not remember "maximized" setting

Initial Comment:
If I maximize jEdit and then close the application, when I restart it, it does not remember that I'd maximized it before.

Using: OpenSUSE 11.2
jedit: 4.3.1

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: don Rhummy (donrhummy)
Date: 2010-08-31 19:23

Message:
Sorry it took so long, I never got an email notification of your reply.
Here it is:


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<!DOCTYPE PERSPECTIVE SYSTEM "perspective.dtd">
<PERSPECTIVE>
<BUFFER AUTORELOAD="TRUE"
AUTORELOAD_DIALOG="TRUE">/home/dev/sizer.html</BUFFER>
<BUFFER AUTORELOAD="TRUE"
AUTORELOAD_DIALOG="TRUE">/home/dev/scripts/animation.js</BUFFER>
<VIEW PLAIN="FALSE"><PANES>
buffer "/home/dev/sizer.html" buff "/home/dev/scripts/animation.js" buff
"editpane" bufferset
</PANES>
<GEOMETRY X="0" Y="0" WIDTH="1426" HEIGHT="900" EXT_STATE="6" />
</VIEW>
</PERSPECTIVE>


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: don Rhummy (donrhummy)
Date: 2010-07-29 22:19

Message:
1440x900 is my screen size. But even when I have it set to 1418x872 (so the
height's also less to account for the title bar) it still doesnn't remember
to maximize on startup.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Shlomy Reinstein (shlomy)
Date: 2010-07-29 21:48

Message:
The 'EXT_STATE' shows that jEdit remembers the maximized state (6).
What is your screen resolution? jEdit ignores the EXT_STATE on startup if
it thinks that the width and height of the window (1418x900 in your
configuration) would put the window partially off-screen.
Thinking of this now, when the windows is maximized, these values probably
indicate the properties of the window before it was maximized - so it
doesn't make sense to ignore the EXT_STATE in this case. I just want to
verify with you that this is the case here.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: don Rhummy (donrhummy)
Date: 2010-07-29 18:31

Message:
Sorry, I just noticed your reply. Yes after PANES, it has:
<GEOMETRY X="0" Y="0" WIDTH="1418" HEIGHT="900" EXT_STATE="6" />

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Shlomy Reinstein (shlomy)
Date: 2010-06-06 15:26

Message:
Can you attach your perspective.xml file (in the jedit settings
directory)?
I should contain something like <GEOMETRY X="..." Y="..."
WIDTH="...HEIGHT="..." EXT_STATE="6" />

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=2996066&group_id=588

Bugs item #3056960, was opened at 2010-08-31 14:35
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by kog13
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=3056960&group_id=588

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: editor core
Group: normal bug
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Damien (kog13)
Assigned to: Matthieu Casanova (kpouer)
Summary: First view brought to front on close all

Initial Comment:
When working with two views, if C+e C+w (Close All) is executed in the second view, then the buffers are closed and the first view is brought back to the front.

On a side note, this also closes all buffers among all views even when the BufferSet scope is not set to global, but I don't know if that qualifies as a bug or not.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=3056960&group_id=588

Plugin Central Submission item #3056906, was opened at 2010-08-31 13:17
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kog13
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=625093&aid=3056906&group_id=588

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Alan Ezust (ezust)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: GitPlugin 0.1

Initial Comment:
{{{ GitPlugin 0.1
    Source: Source code is in SVN under plugins/GitPlugin/tags/0.1
    Announcement: Initial Release
    Requires Java 1.6
    Requires jEdit 04.03.99.00
    Required plugins: 
        projectviewer.ProjectPlugin 3.0.1
        CommonControlsPlugin 1.2
    
    Short Description: Offers a file filter importer for ProjectViewer
    
    Long Description: <html><body>
<p> Provides a git file importer filter for ProjectViewer. 
Future location of other git-related features. </p>
</body></html>
 }}}

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Damien (kog13)
Date: 2010-08-31 13:25

Message:
I've looked a little bit into creating a git plugin, but I haven't found a
decent, well-documented java-based git library. JGit was the closest I
came, but it's not quite complete and has some confusing documentation.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=625093&aid=3056906&group_id=588

Plugin Central Submission item #3056906, was opened at 2010-08-31 11:17
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by ezust
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=625093&aid=3056906&group_id=588

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Alan Ezust (ezust)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: GitPlugin 0.1

Initial Comment:
{{{ GitPlugin 0.1
    Source: Source code is in SVN under plugins/GitPlugin/tags/0.1
    Announcement: Initial Release
    Requires Java 1.6
    Requires jEdit 04.03.99.00
    Required plugins: 
        projectviewer.ProjectPlugin 3.0.1
        CommonControlsPlugin 1.2
    
    Short Description: Offers a file filter importer for ProjectViewer
    
    Long Description: <html><body>
<p> Provides a git file importer filter for ProjectViewer. 
Future location of other git-related features. </p>
</body></html>
 }}}

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=625093&aid=3056906&group_id=588

Hi, it is strange, I use jEdit on Windows 7 since more than 1 year, on
Java 6 too.
What url did you use to download your installer ?

Matthieu

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:42 PM, LawTech <La...@wl...> wrote:
> We have just upgraded a user of JEdit to Windows 7.  So far, we have not
> gotten an install to work.
>
>
>
> The Java version installed is 6.
>
> Suggestions on installing jEdit?  By the way, at the downloads page, either
> using the Java installer or Windows installer comes up with a weird guest
> log in page instead of the install.
>
>
>
> Thanks for any assistance you are able to provide.
>
>
>
>
>
> Dori Hamilton
>
> Technology Support Specialist
>
>
>
> Washington and Lee University
>
> School of Law
>
> 314 Lewis Hall
>
> Lexington,  VA 24450
>
> (540) 458-8021
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
>
> Show off your parallel programming skills.
> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
> --
> -----------------------------------------------
> jEdit Developers' List
> jEd...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jedit-devel
>
>

We have just upgraded a user of JEdit to Windows 7.  So far, we have not gotten an install to work.

The Java version installed is 6.
Suggestions on installing jEdit?  By the way, at the downloads page, either using the Java installer or Windows installer comes up with a weird guest log in page instead of the install.

Thanks for any assistance you are able to provide.


Dori Hamilton
Technology Support Specialist

Washington and Lee University
School of Law
314 Lewis Hall
Lexington,  VA 24450
(540) 458-8021

Feature Requests item #3043117, was opened at 2010-08-11 16:54
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpouer
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350588&aid=3043117&group_id=588

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: core
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: search the contrary of an expression

Initial Comment:
Hi

it would be very usefull to have the possibility to find the contrary of the (maybe regular) expression that we are looking for, like "egrep -v" does

Philippe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Matthieu Casanova (kpouer)
Date: 2010-08-31 16:59

Message:
I understand. I don't know if it is exactly what you need but there is a
macro in the "text" submenu :
LineFilter that does something similar to grep

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Date: 2010-08-31 16:31

Message:
my english (and informatic skills :O) are not excellent, so what I'de like
to find in Jedit is the same result as "grep -v" does on a file

put my buffer in the file thefile.txt
1/ on unix do : grep on thefile.txt
Jedit do that as well (2 lines out)

2/ on unix do : grep -v on thefile.txt
Jedit does not support such option, on unix I get one line

do you understand my poor english now ?


Philippe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Date: 2010-08-31 16:31

Message:
my english (and informatic skills :O) are not excellent, so what I'de like
to find in Jedit is the same result as "grep -v" does on a file

put my buffer in the file thefile.txt
1/ on unix do : grep on thefile.txt
Jedit do that as well (2 lines out)

2/ on unix do : grep -v on thefile.txt
Jedit does not support such option, on unix I get one line

do you understand my poor english now ?


Philippe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Matthieu Casanova (kpouer)
Date: 2010-08-31 13:16

Message:
In fact not it doesn't find
allez les Girondins de Bordeaux !
la meilleure equipe du monde !

it finds that those two lines contains "on"
The search is not line by line and a searched string can contains several
lines.
In fact what you want is a revert grep isn't it ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Date: 2010-08-31 12:21

Message:
Hi

here is my buffer :

allez les Girondins de Bordeaux !
la meilleure equipe du monde !
et de l'univers !


when I make an hypersearch with "on", it finds :

allez les Girondins de Bordeaux !
la meilleure equipe du monde !


I want to make an inverted hypersearch with "on" which would give :

et de l'univers !

I hope it's more clear now...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rowan Collins (imsop)
Date: 2010-08-22 01:03

Message:
I'm not clear what the feature being requested here would do exactly. In a
utility like "egrep", you are searching line by line, showing only those
lines that match a condition, so the option to show lines which *do not*
match the condition makes sense.

But if you do a standard search in an editor, you are searching for any
matching string within the file, and highlighting / jumping to that string.
In that case, what would an inverted search highlight or jump to? (Given
the text "hello kitty, good kitty", what would a search for [not matching
"kitty"] do? highlight "hello " and ", good "?)

Do you specifically want a feature to find *lines* not containing a
specified search term? Or perhaps *files* not containing it? Do you have a
particular use case in mind?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350588&aid=3043117&group_id=588

Feature Requests item #3043117, was opened at 2010-08-11 16:54
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by poleta333
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350588&aid=3043117&group_id=588

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: core
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: search the contrary of an expression

Initial Comment:
Hi

it would be very usefull to have the possibility to find the contrary of the (maybe regular) expression that we are looking for, like "egrep -v" does

Philippe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Date: 2010-08-31 17:16

Message:
I've checked for that plugin but I haven't found it (the most recent one
was RFCReader)... nevertheless, I don't think that this plugin would allow
to add a checkbox in the search window...

(I'm really sorry to consume your time, but I'm really keen on Jedit !)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Matthieu Casanova (kpouer)
Date: 2010-08-31 17:11

Message:
for that you can use the new plugin MenuEditor that was released yesterday,
it allows you to customize all the menus in jEdit.
So if it is solved can I close this tracker ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Date: 2010-08-31 17:03

Message:
great !

that seems to do the job !

many thanks !

(maybe it would be a good thing to integrate this macro in the find
screen...)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Matthieu Casanova (kpouer)
Date: 2010-08-31 16:59

Message:
I understand. I don't know if it is exactly what you need but there is a
macro in the "text" submenu :
LineFilter that does something similar to grep

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Date: 2010-08-31 16:31

Message:
my english (and informatic skills :O) are not excellent, so what I'de like
to find in Jedit is the same result as "grep -v" does on a file

put my buffer in the file thefile.txt
1/ on unix do : grep on thefile.txt
Jedit do that as well (2 lines out)

2/ on unix do : grep -v on thefile.txt
Jedit does not support such option, on unix I get one line

do you understand my poor english now ?


Philippe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Date: 2010-08-31 16:31

Message:
my english (and informatic skills :O) are not excellent, so what I'de like
to find in Jedit is the same result as "grep -v" does on a file

put my buffer in the file thefile.txt
1/ on unix do : grep on thefile.txt
Jedit do that as well (2 lines out)

2/ on unix do : grep -v on thefile.txt
Jedit does not support such option, on unix I get one line

do you understand my poor english now ?


Philippe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Matthieu Casanova (kpouer)
Date: 2010-08-31 13:16

Message:
In fact not it doesn't find
allez les Girondins de Bordeaux !
la meilleure equipe du monde !

it finds that those two lines contains "on"
The search is not line by line and a searched string can contains several
lines.
In fact what you want is a revert grep isn't it ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Date: 2010-08-31 12:21

Message:
Hi

here is my buffer :

allez les Girondins de Bordeaux !
la meilleure equipe du monde !
et de l'univers !


when I make an hypersearch with "on", it finds :

allez les Girondins de Bordeaux !
la meilleure equipe du monde !


I want to make an inverted hypersearch with "on" which would give :

et de l'univers !

I hope it's more clear now...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rowan Collins (imsop)
Date: 2010-08-22 01:03

Message:
I'm not clear what the feature being requested here would do exactly. In a
utility like "egrep", you are searching line by line, showing only those
lines that match a condition, so the option to show lines which *do not*
match the condition makes sense.

But if you do a standard search in an editor, you are searching for any
matching string within the file, and highlighting / jumping to that string.
In that case, what would an inverted search highlight or jump to? (Given
the text "hello kitty, good kitty", what would a search for [not matching
"kitty"] do? highlight "hello " and ", good "?)

Do you specifically want a feature to find *lines* not containing a
specified search term? Or perhaps *files* not containing it? Do you have a
particular use case in mind?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350588&aid=3043117&group_id=588

Feature Requests item #3043117, was opened at 2010-08-11 16:54
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpouer
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350588&aid=3043117&group_id=588

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: core
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: search the contrary of an expression

Initial Comment:
Hi

it would be very usefull to have the possibility to find the contrary of the (maybe regular) expression that we are looking for, like "egrep -v" does

Philippe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Matthieu Casanova (kpouer)
Date: 2010-08-31 17:11

Message:
for that you can use the new plugin MenuEditor that was released yesterday,
it allows you to customize all the menus in jEdit.
So if it is solved can I close this tracker ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Date: 2010-08-31 17:03

Message:
great !

that seems to do the job !

many thanks !

(maybe it would be a good thing to integrate this macro in the find
screen...)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Matthieu Casanova (kpouer)
Date: 2010-08-31 16:59

Message:
I understand. I don't know if it is exactly what you need but there is a
macro in the "text" submenu :
LineFilter that does something similar to grep

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Date: 2010-08-31 16:31

Message:
my english (and informatic skills :O) are not excellent, so what I'de like
to find in Jedit is the same result as "grep -v" does on a file

put my buffer in the file thefile.txt
1/ on unix do : grep on thefile.txt
Jedit do that as well (2 lines out)

2/ on unix do : grep -v on thefile.txt
Jedit does not support such option, on unix I get one line

do you understand my poor english now ?


Philippe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Date: 2010-08-31 16:31

Message:
my english (and informatic skills :O) are not excellent, so what I'de like
to find in Jedit is the same result as "grep -v" does on a file

put my buffer in the file thefile.txt
1/ on unix do : grep on thefile.txt
Jedit do that as well (2 lines out)

2/ on unix do : grep -v on thefile.txt
Jedit does not support such option, on unix I get one line

do you understand my poor english now ?


Philippe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Matthieu Casanova (kpouer)
Date: 2010-08-31 13:16

Message:
In fact not it doesn't find
allez les Girondins de Bordeaux !
la meilleure equipe du monde !

it finds that those two lines contains "on"
The search is not line by line and a searched string can contains several
lines.
In fact what you want is a revert grep isn't it ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Date: 2010-08-31 12:21

Message:
Hi

here is my buffer :

allez les Girondins de Bordeaux !
la meilleure equipe du monde !
et de l'univers !


when I make an hypersearch with "on", it finds :

allez les Girondins de Bordeaux !
la meilleure equipe du monde !


I want to make an inverted hypersearch with "on" which would give :

et de l'univers !

I hope it's more clear now...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rowan Collins (imsop)
Date: 2010-08-22 01:03

Message:
I'm not clear what the feature being requested here would do exactly. In a
utility like "egrep", you are searching line by line, showing only those
lines that match a condition, so the option to show lines which *do not*
match the condition makes sense.

But if you do a standard search in an editor, you are searching for any
matching string within the file, and highlighting / jumping to that string.
In that case, what would an inverted search highlight or jump to? (Given
the text "hello kitty, good kitty", what would a search for [not matching
"kitty"] do? highlight "hello " and ", good "?)

Do you specifically want a feature to find *lines* not containing a
specified search term? Or perhaps *files* not containing it? Do you have a
particular use case in mind?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350588&aid=3043117&group_id=588

Feature Requests item #3043117, was opened at 2010-08-11 16:54
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by poleta333
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350588&aid=3043117&group_id=588

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: core
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: search the contrary of an expression

Initial Comment:
Hi

it would be very usefull to have the possibility to find the contrary of the (maybe regular) expression that we are looking for, like "egrep -v" does

Philippe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Date: 2010-08-31 17:03

Message:
great !

that seems to do the job !

many thanks !

(maybe it would be a good thing to integrate this macro in the find
screen...)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Matthieu Casanova (kpouer)
Date: 2010-08-31 16:59

Message:
I understand. I don't know if it is exactly what you need but there is a
macro in the "text" submenu :
LineFilter that does something similar to grep

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Date: 2010-08-31 16:31

Message:
my english (and informatic skills :O) are not excellent, so what I'de like
to find in Jedit is the same result as "grep -v" does on a file

put my buffer in the file thefile.txt
1/ on unix do : grep on thefile.txt
Jedit do that as well (2 lines out)

2/ on unix do : grep -v on thefile.txt
Jedit does not support such option, on unix I get one line

do you understand my poor english now ?


Philippe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Date: 2010-08-31 16:31

Message:
my english (and informatic skills :O) are not excellent, so what I'de like
to find in Jedit is the same result as "grep -v" does on a file

put my buffer in the file thefile.txt
1/ on unix do : grep on thefile.txt
Jedit do that as well (2 lines out)

2/ on unix do : grep -v on thefile.txt
Jedit does not support such option, on unix I get one line

do you understand my poor english now ?


Philippe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Matthieu Casanova (kpouer)
Date: 2010-08-31 13:16

Message:
In fact not it doesn't find
allez les Girondins de Bordeaux !
la meilleure equipe du monde !

it finds that those two lines contains "on"
The search is not line by line and a searched string can contains several
lines.
In fact what you want is a revert grep isn't it ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Date: 2010-08-31 12:21

Message:
Hi

here is my buffer :

allez les Girondins de Bordeaux !
la meilleure equipe du monde !
et de l'univers !


when I make an hypersearch with "on", it finds :

allez les Girondins de Bordeaux !
la meilleure equipe du monde !


I want to make an inverted hypersearch with "on" which would give :

et de l'univers !

I hope it's more clear now...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rowan Collins (imsop)
Date: 2010-08-22 01:03

Message:
I'm not clear what the feature being requested here would do exactly. In a
utility like "egrep", you are searching line by line, showing only those
lines that match a condition, so the option to show lines which *do not*
match the condition makes sense.

But if you do a standard search in an editor, you are searching for any
matching string within the file, and highlighting / jumping to that string.
In that case, what would an inverted search highlight or jump to? (Given
the text "hello kitty, good kitty", what would a search for [not matching
"kitty"] do? highlight "hello " and ", good "?)

Do you specifically want a feature to find *lines* not containing a
specified search term? Or perhaps *files* not containing it? Do you have a
particular use case in mind?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350588&aid=3043117&group_id=588

Feature Requests item #3043117, was opened at 2010-08-11 16:54
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by poleta333
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350588&aid=3043117&group_id=588

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: core
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: search the contrary of an expression

Initial Comment:
Hi

it would be very usefull to have the possibility to find the contrary of the (maybe regular) expression that we are looking for, like "egrep -v" does

Philippe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Date: 2010-08-31 16:31

Message:
my english (and informatic skills :O) are not excellent, so what I'de like
to find in Jedit is the same result as "grep -v" does on a file

put my buffer in the file thefile.txt
1/ on unix do : grep on thefile.txt
Jedit do that as well (2 lines out)

2/ on unix do : grep -v on thefile.txt
Jedit does not support such option, on unix I get one line

do you understand my poor english now ?


Philippe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Date: 2010-08-31 16:31

Message:
my english (and informatic skills :O) are not excellent, so what I'de like
to find in Jedit is the same result as "grep -v" does on a file

put my buffer in the file thefile.txt
1/ on unix do : grep on thefile.txt
Jedit do that as well (2 lines out)

2/ on unix do : grep -v on thefile.txt
Jedit does not support such option, on unix I get one line

do you understand my poor english now ?


Philippe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Matthieu Casanova (kpouer)
Date: 2010-08-31 13:16

Message:
In fact not it doesn't find
allez les Girondins de Bordeaux !
la meilleure equipe du monde !

it finds that those two lines contains "on"
The search is not line by line and a searched string can contains several
lines.
In fact what you want is a revert grep isn't it ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Date: 2010-08-31 12:21

Message:
Hi

here is my buffer :

allez les Girondins de Bordeaux !
la meilleure equipe du monde !
et de l'univers !


when I make an hypersearch with "on", it finds :

allez les Girondins de Bordeaux !
la meilleure equipe du monde !


I want to make an inverted hypersearch with "on" which would give :

et de l'univers !

I hope it's more clear now...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rowan Collins (imsop)
Date: 2010-08-22 01:03

Message:
I'm not clear what the feature being requested here would do exactly. In a
utility like "egrep", you are searching line by line, showing only those
lines that match a condition, so the option to show lines which *do not*
match the condition makes sense.

But if you do a standard search in an editor, you are searching for any
matching string within the file, and highlighting / jumping to that string.
In that case, what would an inverted search highlight or jump to? (Given
the text "hello kitty, good kitty", what would a search for [not matching
"kitty"] do? highlight "hello " and ", good "?)

Do you specifically want a feature to find *lines* not containing a
specified search term? Or perhaps *files* not containing it? Do you have a
particular use case in mind?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350588&aid=3043117&group_id=588

Feature Requests item #3043117, was opened at 2010-08-11 16:54
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by poleta333
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350588&aid=3043117&group_id=588

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: core
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: search the contrary of an expression

Initial Comment:
Hi

it would be very usefull to have the possibility to find the contrary of the (maybe regular) expression that we are looking for, like "egrep -v" does

Philippe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Date: 2010-08-31 16:31

Message:
my english (and informatic skills :O) are not excellent, so what I'de like
to find in Jedit is the same result as "grep -v" does on a file

put my buffer in the file thefile.txt
1/ on unix do : grep on thefile.txt
Jedit do that as well (2 lines out)

2/ on unix do : grep -v on thefile.txt
Jedit does not support such option, on unix I get one line

do you understand my poor english now ?


Philippe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Matthieu Casanova (kpouer)
Date: 2010-08-31 13:16

Message:
In fact not it doesn't find
allez les Girondins de Bordeaux !
la meilleure equipe du monde !

it finds that those two lines contains "on"
The search is not line by line and a searched string can contains several
lines.
In fact what you want is a revert grep isn't it ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Date: 2010-08-31 12:21

Message:
Hi

here is my buffer :

allez les Girondins de Bordeaux !
la meilleure equipe du monde !
et de l'univers !


when I make an hypersearch with "on", it finds :

allez les Girondins de Bordeaux !
la meilleure equipe du monde !


I want to make an inverted hypersearch with "on" which would give :

et de l'univers !

I hope it's more clear now...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rowan Collins (imsop)
Date: 2010-08-22 01:03

Message:
I'm not clear what the feature being requested here would do exactly. In a
utility like "egrep", you are searching line by line, showing only those
lines that match a condition, so the option to show lines which *do not*
match the condition makes sense.

But if you do a standard search in an editor, you are searching for any
matching string within the file, and highlighting / jumping to that string.
In that case, what would an inverted search highlight or jump to? (Given
the text "hello kitty, good kitty", what would a search for [not matching
"kitty"] do? highlight "hello " and ", good "?)

Do you specifically want a feature to find *lines* not containing a
specified search term? Or perhaps *files* not containing it? Do you have a
particular use case in mind?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350588&aid=3043117&group_id=588

Feature Requests item #3043117, was opened at 2010-08-11 16:54
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpouer
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350588&aid=3043117&group_id=588

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: core
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: search the contrary of an expression

Initial Comment:
Hi

it would be very usefull to have the possibility to find the contrary of the (maybe regular) expression that we are looking for, like "egrep -v" does

Philippe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Matthieu Casanova (kpouer)
Date: 2010-08-31 13:16

Message:
In fact not it doesn't find
allez les Girondins de Bordeaux !
la meilleure equipe du monde !

it finds that those two lines contains "on"
The search is not line by line and a searched string can contains several
lines.
In fact what you want is a revert grep isn't it ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Date: 2010-08-31 12:21

Message:
Hi

here is my buffer :

allez les Girondins de Bordeaux !
la meilleure equipe du monde !
et de l'univers !


when I make an hypersearch with "on", it finds :

allez les Girondins de Bordeaux !
la meilleure equipe du monde !


I want to make an inverted hypersearch with "on" which would give :

et de l'univers !

I hope it's more clear now...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rowan Collins (imsop)
Date: 2010-08-22 01:03

Message:
I'm not clear what the feature being requested here would do exactly. In a
utility like "egrep", you are searching line by line, showing only those
lines that match a condition, so the option to show lines which *do not*
match the condition makes sense.

But if you do a standard search in an editor, you are searching for any
matching string within the file, and highlighting / jumping to that string.
In that case, what would an inverted search highlight or jump to? (Given
the text "hello kitty, good kitty", what would a search for [not matching
"kitty"] do? highlight "hello " and ", good "?)

Do you specifically want a feature to find *lines* not containing a
specified search term? Or perhaps *files* not containing it? Do you have a
particular use case in mind?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350588&aid=3043117&group_id=588

Feature Requests item #3043117, was opened at 2010-08-11 16:54
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by poleta333
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350588&aid=3043117&group_id=588

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: core
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: search the contrary of an expression

Initial Comment:
Hi

it would be very usefull to have the possibility to find the contrary of the (maybe regular) expression that we are looking for, like "egrep -v" does

Philippe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: poleta333 (poleta333)
Date: 2010-08-31 12:21

Message:
Hi

here is my buffer :

allez les Girondins de Bordeaux !
la meilleure equipe du monde !
et de l'univers !


when I make an hypersearch with "on", it finds :

allez les Girondins de Bordeaux !
la meilleure equipe du monde !


I want to make an inverted hypersearch with "on" which would give :

et de l'univers !

I hope it's more clear now...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rowan Collins (imsop)
Date: 2010-08-22 01:03

Message:
I'm not clear what the feature being requested here would do exactly. In a
utility like "egrep", you are searching line by line, showing only those
lines that match a condition, so the option to show lines which *do not*
match the condition makes sense.

But if you do a standard search in an editor, you are searching for any
matching string within the file, and highlighting / jumping to that string.
In that case, what would an inverted search highlight or jump to? (Given
the text "hello kitty, good kitty", what would a search for [not matching
"kitty"] do? highlight "hello " and ", good "?)

Do you specifically want a feature to find *lines* not containing a
specified search term? Or perhaps *files* not containing it? Do you have a
particular use case in mind?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350588&aid=3043117&group_id=588

Patches item #3031412, was opened at 2010-07-19 05:29
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpouer
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300588&aid=3031412&group_id=588

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: texteditor
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: https://www.google.com/accounts ()
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Visual Basic mode

Initial Comment:
Visual Basic mode

A improved version of vbscript.xml
- More Keywords
- Support digits of any kind (int, float, hex, oct, scientific and variations)
- Support date notation
- Functions enabled
- Auto identation for conditional and loop structures

The catalog entry is inside visualbasic.xml file as a comment

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Matthieu Casanova (kpouer)
Date: 2010-08-31 10:44

Message:
committed in rev 18455

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300588&aid=3031412&group_id=588

Plugin Central Submission item #3052255, was opened at 2010-08-24 14:52
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpouer
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=625093&aid=3052255&group_id=588

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Matthieu Casanova (kpouer)
Assigned to: Townsfolk (elberry)
Summary: MibSideKick 1.2.1

Initial Comment:
{{{ MibSideKick 1.2.1
    Source: https://jedit.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/jedit/plugins/MibSideKick/tags/MibSideKick-1.2.1
    Announcement: Fixed NPE when import paths doesn't exist
        Fixed mib tree construction not being done in AWT Thread resulting in some exceptions when using Substance Look & Feel
    Requires Java 1.5
    Requires jEdit 04.03.99.00
    Required plugins: 
        sidekick.SideKickPlugin 0.7.5
        errorlist.ErrorListPlugin 1.7
    
    Short Description: MibSideKick is a mib parser
    
    Long Description: <html>
<p>Parse the mib and shows you parse errors<br/>
This plugin uses the mibble parser (http://www.mibble.org/) 
</p>
</html>
 }}}

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Matthieu Casanova (kpouer)
Date: 2010-08-31 09:52

Message:
ok so it was an unused import, I removed it and overwrote the tag

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Matthieu Casanova (kpouer)
Date: 2010-08-31 09:35

Message:
oh right, it is new I will remove that dependency

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Townsfolk (elberry)
Date: 2010-08-27 02:21

Message:
Ok. I fixed the build so that the documentation and dependencies work, but
I'm getting a compilation error now:
[quote]
 [jp.javac] Compiling 3 source files to
/Users/eberry/development/projects/jedit/plugins/sandbox/MibSideKick-1.2.1/MibSideKick/build/classes
 [jp.javac]
/Users/eberry/development/projects/jedit/plugins/sandbox/MibSideKick-1.2.1/MibSideKick/src/gatchan/jedit/mibsidekick/MibSidekickParser.java:32:
cannot find symbol
 [jp.javac] symbol  : class ThreadUtilities
 [jp.javac] location: package org.gjt.sp.util
 [jp.javac] import org.gjt.sp.util.ThreadUtilities;
 [jp.javac]                       ^
 [jp.javac] Note:
/Users/eberry/development/projects/jedit/plugins/sandbox/MibSideKick-1.2.1/MibSideKick/src/gatchan/jedit/mibsidekick/MibSidekickParser.java
uses unchecked or unsafe operations.
 [jp.javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.
 [jp.javac] 1 error
[/quote]

Are the new ThreadUtilities in jEdit 4?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Townsfolk (elberry)
Date: 2010-08-27 00:54

Message:
I'm getting an error while building. Looks like it's failing during the
docs building.

It says:
build-support/plugin-build.xml:456: exec returned: 6

Any ideas?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=625093&aid=3052255&group_id=588

Plugin Central Submission item #3052255, was opened at 2010-08-24 14:52
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by kpouer
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=625093&aid=3052255&group_id=588

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Matthieu Casanova (kpouer)
Assigned to: Townsfolk (elberry)
Summary: MibSideKick 1.2.1

Initial Comment:
{{{ MibSideKick 1.2.1
    Source: https://jedit.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/jedit/plugins/MibSideKick/tags/MibSideKick-1.2.1
    Announcement: Fixed NPE when import paths doesn't exist
        Fixed mib tree construction not being done in AWT Thread resulting in some exceptions when using Substance Look & Feel
    Requires Java 1.5
    Requires jEdit 04.03.99.00
    Required plugins: 
        sidekick.SideKickPlugin 0.7.5
        errorlist.ErrorListPlugin 1.7
    
    Short Description: MibSideKick is a mib parser
    
    Long Description: <html>
<p>Parse the mib and shows you parse errors<br/>
This plugin uses the mibble parser (http://www.mibble.org/) 
</p>
</html>
 }}}

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Matthieu Casanova (kpouer)
Date: 2010-08-31 09:35

Message:
oh right, it is new I will remove that dependency

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Townsfolk (elberry)
Date: 2010-08-27 02:21

Message:
Ok. I fixed the build so that the documentation and dependencies work, but
I'm getting a compilation error now:
[quote]
 [jp.javac] Compiling 3 source files to
/Users/eberry/development/projects/jedit/plugins/sandbox/MibSideKick-1.2.1/MibSideKick/build/classes
 [jp.javac]
/Users/eberry/development/projects/jedit/plugins/sandbox/MibSideKick-1.2.1/MibSideKick/src/gatchan/jedit/mibsidekick/MibSidekickParser.java:32:
cannot find symbol
 [jp.javac] symbol  : class ThreadUtilities
 [jp.javac] location: package org.gjt.sp.util
 [jp.javac] import org.gjt.sp.util.ThreadUtilities;
 [jp.javac]                       ^
 [jp.javac] Note:
/Users/eberry/development/projects/jedit/plugins/sandbox/MibSideKick-1.2.1/MibSideKick/src/gatchan/jedit/mibsidekick/MibSidekickParser.java
uses unchecked or unsafe operations.
 [jp.javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.
 [jp.javac] 1 error
[/quote]

Are the new ThreadUtilities in jEdit 4?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Townsfolk (elberry)
Date: 2010-08-27 00:54

Message:
I'm getting an error while building. Looks like it's failing during the
docs building.

It says:
build-support/plugin-build.xml:456: exec returned: 6

Any ideas?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=625093&aid=3052255&group_id=588

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Alan Ezust <ala...@gm...> wrote:
> In my attempt to refactor, I made it a bit simpler. There were some
> unused variables and arguments in your original design.
> I also used ProcessBuilder instead of the old getRuntime().exec(),
> which allows for merging of stdout and stderr.
> Which is also what I did, to reduce the number of threads I needed to create.
>
> But do you think this Command class belongs in CommonControls.io?

My code uses the CommonControls worker thread pool; so you don't have
to create any threads manually. That could probably be changed to use
Matthieu's new code in jEdit, if 4.3 compatibility is not an issue.
But separating stdout and stderr is useful.

In the implementation I started working on, the Visitor interface
allows one to easily merge them, but you'd still get two threads (one
for stdout, one for stderr). I don't remember why I did not use
ProcessBuilder, but I'm pretty sure there was a reason for it in the
P4 plugin code.

And yeah, common.io should be a good place for code like this.

> It seems to perform well, but I didn't bother with VFS code, since I
> still don't really understand how to use that API effectively.
> So it assumes everything is on the local file system.

Don't really know what you mean by VFS in the context of running a
child process.

-- 
Marcelo Vanzin
mmv...@gm...
"Life's too short to drink cheap beer."

In my attempt to refactor, I made it a bit simpler. There were some
unused variables and arguments in your original design.
I also used ProcessBuilder instead of the old getRuntime().exec(),
which allows for merging of stdout and stderr.
Which is also what I did, to reduce the number of threads I needed to create.

It seems to perform well, but I didn't bother with VFS code, since I
still don't really understand how to use that API effectively.
So it assumes everything is on the local file system.

But do you think this Command class belongs in CommonControls.io?


On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Marcelo Vanzin
<va...@us...> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Alan Ezust <ala...@gm...> wrote:
>> Anyway, I made a first attempt at GitPlugin.
>> The process.waitFor() seems to cause a deadlock in jEdit right now, and
>> I'm not exactly sure why. I will have to debug it further. But once
>> that is working, I can use that as a model for writing the Bzr entries
>> filter too...
>
> For these command line-based SCMs it might be useful to refactor
> P4Plugin's "Perforce" class into something more generic. It's
> basically a wrapper around a subprocess. I started doing it some time
> ago but as usual turned my attention to something else before I
> finished...
>
> --
> Marcelo Vanzin
> mmv...@gm...
> "Life's too short to drink cheap beer."
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program
> Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of netbook users
> worldwide. Take advantage of special opportunities to increase revenue and
> speed time-to-market. Join now, and jumpstart your future.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-atom-d2d
> --
> -----------------------------------------------
> jEdit Developers' List
> jEd...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jedit-devel
>

Plugin Feature Requests item #2780155, was opened at 2009-04-23 23:19
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by ezust
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=997936&aid=2780155&group_id=588

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Alan Ezust (ezust)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
>Summary: HG (mercurial) input file filter for PV

Initial Comment:
it would be nice if PV had an  HG and GIT input file filters, like it has for CVS/SVN.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Alan Ezust (ezust)
Date: 2010-01-11 14:46

Message:
I'm embarrassed that I have not done this yet, and once I have time for it
I will re-assign to myself.
In the meantime, if someone else wants to work on it, I don't want them to
think that I am.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Alan Ezust (ezust)
Date: 2009-04-28 13:09

Message:
Thanks, scarlac. Now it's tracked, I'll assign it to myself and get to this
sometime next weekend.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Seph Soliman (scarlac)
Date: 2009-04-24 02:24

Message:
Hey

I talked to you, Alan about this ealier, and I can contribute with a
modified version of HGKit's Java Mercurial implementation. I've isolated
the nescessary class to be DirState and modified the source so it will work
outside the HGKit codebase. For anyone who want to have a stab at it:

http://www.mijav.dk/download/DirState.java.zip

Example:
satir:dirstate seph$ java DirState
/Users/seph/jobs/basecamp-time-widget/.hg/dirstate
src/js/stopwatch.js
src/images/bg-back.png
src/css/widget.css
src/widget.html
src/js/utils.js
Makefile
material/play.svg
material/Icon.svg
src/images/ajax-loader-back.gif
src/images/watch.png
(...)

>From HG-kit:
http://hgkit.berlios.de/

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=997936&aid=2780155&group_id=588

Plugin Feature Requests item #3053139, was opened at 2010-08-25 11:24
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ezust
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=997936&aid=3053139&group_id=588

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Alan Ezust (ezust)
>Assigned to: Alan Ezust (ezust)
Summary: Git ls-files import filter for ProjectViewer

Initial Comment:
subject says it all

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Alan Ezust (ezust)
Date: 2010-08-30 13:49

Message:
Committed rev# 18448 to GitPlugin in svn.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Marcelo Vanzin (vanza)
Date: 2010-08-25 22:00

Message:
This kind of thing does not belong in PV, but in a git plugin that
interfaces with PV just like P4Plugin and SvnPlugin do. Since I have no
immediate plans to work on such a plugin, there's no point in assigning
this to me.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=997936&aid=3053139&group_id=588

Plugin Central Submission item #3055580, was opened at 2010-08-29 13:17
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by elberry
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=625093&aid=3055580&group_id=588

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Shlomy Reinstein (shlomy)
Assigned to: Townsfolk (elberry)
Summary: MenuEditor 0.4

Initial Comment:
{{{ MenuEditor 0.4
    Source: Source code is in SVN with the tag release-0-4
    Announcement: This version of MenuEditor allows editing of the menu bar itself (e.g. adding new menus). The built-in menus cannot be removed, as they are required for normal operation, but they can be reordered.
        Also updated the dependency on JDiffPlugin, to include some new bug fixes.
    Requires Java 1.6
    Requires jEdit 04.03.99.00
    Required plugins: 
        jdiff.JDiffPlugin 3.1.1
    
    Short Description: Allow editing of jEdit menus
    
    Long Description: The Menu Editor Plugin
Written by Shlomy Reinstein, August 2010.

The Menu Editor plugin allows you to rearrange the jEdit menu
(File/Edit/Search...), shown at the top of each view. You can rearrange the
items in each menu, remove items from a menu, or add items to a menu.

In addition, the plugin allows you to rearrange the menu bar itself - reorder
the menus, add new menus or remove existing menus.
 }}}

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Townsfolk (elberry)
Date: 2010-08-30 11:05

Message:
Released to Plugin Central.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=625093&aid=3055580&group_id=588

Plugin Central Submission item #3055583, was opened at 2010-08-29 13:21
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by elberry
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=625093&aid=3055583&group_id=588

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Shlomy Reinstein (shlomy)
Assigned to: Townsfolk (elberry)
Summary: JDiffPlugin 3.1.1

Initial Comment:
{{{ JDiffPlugin 3.1.1
    Source: Source code is in SVN with the tag jdiffplugin-3_1_1
    Announcement: This is a bug fix release of JDiffPlugin. All bug fixes are in the Patch implementation in the plugin.
    Requires Java 1.5
    Requires jEdit 04.03.15.00
    Required plugins: 
        CommonControlsPlugin 0.9.5
    
    Short Description: JDiffPlugin is a visual diff and merge utility for jEdit.
    
    Long Description: JDiffPlugin is a visual diff utility for jEdit.
 }}}

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Townsfolk (elberry)
Date: 2010-08-30 10:54

Message:
Released to Plugin Central.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Townsfolk (elberry)
Date: 2010-08-30 10:06

Message:
Also, Shlomy, the plugin's change history is pretty detailed. You might
want to update the history with your most recent changes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Townsfolk (elberry)
Date: 2010-08-30 10:03

Message:
Cool beans. Is it ok if I bump the required jEdit version to at least 4.3
final?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dale Anson (daleanson)
Date: 2010-08-29 21:39

Message:
I still haven't had time to check, but I've seen enough of Shlomy's work to
be confident it's good. Also, I'm not the owner of this plugin, I've just
been maintaining it for a while.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Shlomy Reinstein (shlomy)
Date: 2010-08-29 21:22

Message:
These are strictly bug fixes to the Patch implementation in the plugin. It
doesn't work without them.
I made two bunches of fixes. I asked Dale after the first one, but he was
busy on a trip and couldn't check them, he asked me to commit them myself.
I never saw how the Patch implementation can be used by JDiffPlugin
itself. If there is some UI for it, you can check it before my changes and
after, and see if I broke something - I think I only fixed things that
didn't work before.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Townsfolk (elberry)
Date: 2010-08-29 18:25

Message:
Shlomy should you run these changes by Dale first?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=625093&aid=3055583&group_id=588

Plugin Central Submission item #3055583, was opened at 2010-08-29 13:21
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by elberry
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=625093&aid=3055583&group_id=588

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Pending
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Shlomy Reinstein (shlomy)
Assigned to: Townsfolk (elberry)
Summary: JDiffPlugin 3.1.1

Initial Comment:
{{{ JDiffPlugin 3.1.1
    Source: Source code is in SVN with the tag jdiffplugin-3_1_1
    Announcement: This is a bug fix release of JDiffPlugin. All bug fixes are in the Patch implementation in the plugin.
    Requires Java 1.5
    Requires jEdit 04.03.15.00
    Required plugins: 
        CommonControlsPlugin 0.9.5
    
    Short Description: JDiffPlugin is a visual diff and merge utility for jEdit.
    
    Long Description: JDiffPlugin is a visual diff utility for jEdit.
 }}}

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Townsfolk (elberry)
Date: 2010-08-30 10:06

Message:
Also, Shlomy, the plugin's change history is pretty detailed. You might
want to update the history with your most recent changes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Townsfolk (elberry)
Date: 2010-08-30 10:03

Message:
Cool beans. Is it ok if I bump the required jEdit version to at least 4.3
final?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dale Anson (daleanson)
Date: 2010-08-29 21:39

Message:
I still haven't had time to check, but I've seen enough of Shlomy's work to
be confident it's good. Also, I'm not the owner of this plugin, I've just
been maintaining it for a while.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Shlomy Reinstein (shlomy)
Date: 2010-08-29 21:22

Message:
These are strictly bug fixes to the Patch implementation in the plugin. It
doesn't work without them.
I made two bunches of fixes. I asked Dale after the first one, but he was
busy on a trip and couldn't check them, he asked me to commit them myself.
I never saw how the Patch implementation can be used by JDiffPlugin
itself. If there is some UI for it, you can check it before my changes and
after, and see if I broke something - I think I only fixed things that
didn't work before.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Townsfolk (elberry)
Date: 2010-08-29 18:25

Message:
Shlomy should you run these changes by Dale first?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=625093&aid=3055583&group_id=588

Plugin Central Submission item #3055583, was opened at 2010-08-29 13:21
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by elberry
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=625093&aid=3055583&group_id=588

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Pending
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Shlomy Reinstein (shlomy)
Assigned to: Townsfolk (elberry)
Summary: JDiffPlugin 3.1.1

Initial Comment:
{{{ JDiffPlugin 3.1.1
    Source: Source code is in SVN with the tag jdiffplugin-3_1_1
    Announcement: This is a bug fix release of JDiffPlugin. All bug fixes are in the Patch implementation in the plugin.
    Requires Java 1.5
    Requires jEdit 04.03.15.00
    Required plugins: 
        CommonControlsPlugin 0.9.5
    
    Short Description: JDiffPlugin is a visual diff and merge utility for jEdit.
    
    Long Description: JDiffPlugin is a visual diff utility for jEdit.
 }}}

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Townsfolk (elberry)
Date: 2010-08-30 10:03

Message:
Cool beans. Is it ok if I bump the required jEdit version to at least 4.3
final?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dale Anson (daleanson)
Date: 2010-08-29 21:39

Message:
I still haven't had time to check, but I've seen enough of Shlomy's work to
be confident it's good. Also, I'm not the owner of this plugin, I've just
been maintaining it for a while.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Shlomy Reinstein (shlomy)
Date: 2010-08-29 21:22

Message:
These are strictly bug fixes to the Patch implementation in the plugin. It
doesn't work without them.
I made two bunches of fixes. I asked Dale after the first one, but he was
busy on a trip and couldn't check them, he asked me to commit them myself.
I never saw how the Patch implementation can be used by JDiffPlugin
itself. If there is some UI for it, you can check it before my changes and
after, and see if I broke something - I think I only fixed things that
didn't work before.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Townsfolk (elberry)
Date: 2010-08-29 18:25

Message:
Shlomy should you run these changes by Dale first?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=625093&aid=3055583&group_id=588