You can subscribe to this list here.
| 1999 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(32) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 |
Jan
(452) |
Feb
(435) |
Mar
(117) |
Apr
(265) |
May
(161) |
Jun
(276) |
Jul
(409) |
Aug
(522) |
Sep
(139) |
Oct
(306) |
Nov
(406) |
Dec
(217) |
| 2001 |
Jan
(237) |
Feb
(194) |
Mar
(266) |
Apr
(298) |
May
(266) |
Jun
(195) |
Jul
(427) |
Aug
(660) |
Sep
(808) |
Oct
(465) |
Nov
(260) |
Dec
(226) |
| 2002 |
Jan
(255) |
Feb
(322) |
Mar
(440) |
Apr
(327) |
May
(271) |
Jun
(263) |
Jul
(122) |
Aug
(346) |
Sep
(172) |
Oct
(282) |
Nov
(184) |
Dec
(166) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(325) |
Feb
(431) |
Mar
(431) |
Apr
(238) |
May
(320) |
Jun
(331) |
Jul
(289) |
Aug
(277) |
Sep
(223) |
Oct
(273) |
Nov
(218) |
Dec
(223) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(203) |
Feb
(321) |
Mar
(316) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(44) |
Jun
(149) |
Jul
(83) |
Aug
(216) |
Sep
(188) |
Oct
(136) |
Nov
(73) |
Dec
(117) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(101) |
Feb
(208) |
Mar
(153) |
Apr
(81) |
May
(85) |
Jun
(87) |
Jul
(100) |
Aug
(145) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(123) |
Nov
(73) |
Dec
(105) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(211) |
Feb
(134) |
Mar
(299) |
Apr
(223) |
May
(292) |
Jun
(426) |
Jul
(477) |
Aug
(415) |
Sep
(501) |
Oct
(460) |
Nov
(427) |
Dec
(302) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(467) |
Feb
(423) |
Mar
(356) |
Apr
(241) |
May
(357) |
Jun
(342) |
Jul
(373) |
Aug
(421) |
Sep
(491) |
Oct
(266) |
Nov
(236) |
Dec
(310) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(228) |
Feb
(344) |
Mar
(466) |
Apr
(410) |
May
(437) |
Jun
(303) |
Jul
(255) |
Aug
(451) |
Sep
(520) |
Oct
(379) |
Nov
(430) |
Dec
(261) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(352) |
Feb
(394) |
Mar
(279) |
Apr
(534) |
May
(245) |
Jun
(392) |
Jul
(510) |
Aug
(392) |
Sep
(237) |
Oct
(332) |
Nov
(302) |
Dec
(590) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(723) |
Feb
(650) |
Mar
(530) |
Apr
(307) |
May
(300) |
Jun
(450) |
Jul
(196) |
Aug
(233) |
Sep
(270) |
Oct
(288) |
Nov
(284) |
Dec
(331) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(336) |
Feb
(277) |
Mar
(133) |
Apr
(102) |
May
(50) |
Jun
(234) |
Jul
(174) |
Aug
(274) |
Sep
(355) |
Oct
(273) |
Nov
(895) |
Dec
(749) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(744) |
Feb
(498) |
Mar
(767) |
Apr
(412) |
May
(513) |
Jun
(596) |
Jul
(372) |
Aug
(515) |
Sep
(373) |
Oct
(246) |
Nov
(210) |
Dec
(232) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(162) |
Feb
(226) |
Mar
(209) |
Apr
(162) |
May
(84) |
Jun
(153) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(142) |
Sep
(151) |
Oct
(220) |
Nov
(176) |
Dec
(131) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(61) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(93) |
Apr
(274) |
May
(83) |
Jun
(46) |
Jul
(149) |
Aug
(61) |
Sep
(49) |
Oct
(93) |
Nov
(100) |
Dec
(164) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(93) |
Feb
(130) |
Mar
(44) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(85) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(47) |
Aug
(131) |
Sep
(117) |
Oct
(115) |
Nov
(73) |
Dec
(84) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(106) |
Feb
(88) |
Mar
(116) |
Apr
(160) |
May
(121) |
Jun
(74) |
Jul
(126) |
Aug
(141) |
Sep
(101) |
Oct
(38) |
Nov
(32) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(33) |
Feb
(60) |
Mar
(112) |
Apr
(33) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(115) |
Jul
(24) |
Aug
|
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(147) |
Nov
(166) |
Dec
(118) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(53) |
Feb
(51) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(14) |
Jul
(18) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(27) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(21) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(45) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(32) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
(41) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(60) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
(26) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(67) |
Jun
(42) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(73) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(14) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(20) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
| 2022 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(25) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(27) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
|
| 2023 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(11) |
Apr
|
May
(13) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(50) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2024 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(35) |
Jun
|
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(33) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(12) |
| 2025 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(24) |
|
2
(10) |
3
(7) |
4
(16) |
5
(17) |
6
(6) |
7
(8) |
8
(2) |
|
9
(1) |
10
(6) |
11
(10) |
12
(10) |
13
(4) |
14
(10) |
15
(12) |
|
16
(2) |
17
(10) |
18
(24) |
19
(21) |
20
(21) |
21
(31) |
22
(13) |
|
23
(9) |
24
(20) |
25
(11) |
26
(24) |
27
(36) |
28
(66) |
|
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-02-28 23:01:02
|
Bugs item #691891, was opened at 2003-02-23 17:32 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=691891&group_id=588 Category: plugins Group: minor bug >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Conor MacNeill (conormac) Assigned to: Slava Pestov (spestov) Summary: Console error pattern for Ant missing "-" Initial Comment: Ant task names may contain hyphens. This needs to be added to the console plugin's error pattern. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=691891&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-02-28 23:00:00
|
Bugs item #692588, was opened at 2003-02-24 18:20 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=692588&group_id=588 Category: plugins Group: minor bug >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Slava Pestov (spestov) Summary: Commando: Ant option assuming any XML to be the build file Initial Comment: The logic for the Commando "Ant" command will use the build.xml file in the project directory, unless the file in the active buffer happens to be an XML file. In this case, it will assume this XML file to be the Ant build file. I'm using JEdit frequently for XML files and for Docbook, so hitting the Ant command is resulting in it ignoring my build.xml file and trying to run "report.xml" or whatever is in my current buffer instead. Build.XML is a very standard name for the Ant build file, so much so that if you have another-named XML file in the buffer, chances are it's not the Ant build file--just another XML document instead. It may be better to make the file guessing logic stricter: always choose the build.xml file in the project directory, unless the file in the active buffer is also called build.xml (say, if I've opened one from another directory), in which case go with that build.xml version instead. Thanks, Glen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=692588&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-02-28 19:45:06
|
Bugs item #528821, was opened at 2002-03-11 21:26 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=528821&group_id=588 Category: plugin manager Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Slava Pestov (spestov) Summary: Fix loading/unloading of plugins Initial Comment: Please fix the unnoying need to restart jEdit when we load or unload plugins. The way that it can be done takes advantage of heirarchical classloaders. Basically, you have a parent classloader that takes care of all the core classes. For EACH plugin jar, you load it in its own classloader with the parent being the core classloader. Something along the lines of this: m_coreManager = this.class.getClassLoader(); m_classloaderMap = new HashMap(); // for new jars added to the system m_classloaderMap.put( pathToPlugin, new UrlClassLoader( pathToPlugin ) ); // to remove a plugin m_classloaderMap.remove( pathToPlugin ); // to update a plugin m_classloaderMap.put( pathToPlugin, new UrlClassLoader( pathToPlugin ) ); // to load a class for the plugin ClassLoader loader = (ClassLoader) m_classloaderMap.get( pathToPlugin ); Plugin pi = (Plugin) loader.loadClass( Plugin.START_CLASS ) .newInstance(); Of course, when you no longer need it, you have the plugin clean up after itself and remove the entry in the classloaderMap. We use this approach in Apache Cocoon to load dynamically generated classes at runtime. We re- compile the code any time the source is altered. We have seen this work quite well in the server arena. You should be able to use it in jEdit. BTW: URL for Apache Cocoon is http://xml.apache.org/cocoon ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Dale Anson (daleanson) Date: 2003-02-28 11:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=187628 Would this approach make it possible for plugins to have different versions of the same library jar file? That is, could plugin A rely on version 1.0 of blah.jar and plugin B rely on version 1.3 of blah.jar and both jars could be loaded at the same time? If so, this would go a long way toward eliminating the odd dependencies that one plugin may have on another (there may be no real dependency except for a library file) and would allow a plugin to better control its library files. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=528821&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-02-28 17:22:46
|
Bugs item #672047, was opened at 2003-01-21 16:05 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=672047&group_id=588 Category: plugins Group: normal bug Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Derek Groothuis (dgroo) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: DotComplete plugin - NPE on quit... Initial Comment: I am getting a NullPointerException on certain occasions when I try to quit (using File->Quit). It appears to be related to closing Plugins windows, but the actual error has occured with respect to several plugins, so I'm guessing it might be in the API itself. The exception I've been getting is: [debug] SessionManager: session saved: SOAP [error] AWT-EventQueue-0: java.lang.NullPointerException [error] AWT-EventQueue-0: at dotcomplete.popup.BasePopup.dispose(Unknown Source) [error] AWT-EventQueue-0: at dotcomplete.popup.SuicidalMsgPopup.dispose(Unknown Source) [error] AWT-EventQueue-0: at java.awt.Window$1$DisposeAction.run(Window.java:534) [error] AWT-EventQueue-0: at java.awt.Window.dispose(Window.java:552) [error] AWT-EventQueue-0: at org.gjt.sp.jedit.View.close(Unknown Source) [error] AWT-EventQueue-0: at org.gjt.sp.jedit.jEdit.exit(Unknown Source) [error] AWT-EventQueue-0: at org.gjt.sp.jedit.jEdit.closeView(Unknown Source) [error] AWT-EventQueue-0: at org.gjt.sp.jedit.jEdit.closeView(Unknown Source) [error] AWT-EventQueue-0: at org.gjt.sp.jedit.View$WindowHandler.windowClosing(Unknown Source) [error] AWT-EventQueue-0: at java.awt.AWTEventMulticaster.windowClosing(AWTEventMulticaster.java:287) [error] AWT-EventQueue-0: at java.awt.Window.processWindowEvent(Window.java:1102) [error] AWT-EventQueue-0: at javax.swing.JFrame.processWindowEvent(JFrame.java:266) [error] AWT-EventQueue-0: at java.awt.Window.processEvent(Window.java:1061) [error] AWT-EventQueue-0: at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Component.java:3598) [error] AWT-EventQueue-0: at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:1623) [error] AWT-EventQueue-0: at java.awt.Window.dispatchEventImpl(Window.java:1585) [error] AWT-EventQueue-0: at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:3439) [error] AWT-EventQueue-0: at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:450) [error] AWT-EventQueue-0: at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:197) [error] AWT-EventQueue-0: at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:150) [error] AWT-EventQueue-0: at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:144) [error] AWT-EventQueue-0: at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:136) [error] AWT-EventQueue-0: at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:99) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Derek Groothuis (dgroo) Date: 2003-01-22 11:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566189 Slava - looks like you're right. I'll let the developer know. The other bug (weird files opening) does appear to be related to something else, though... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Slava Pestov (spestov) Date: 2003-01-21 16:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=2280 If you look at the traceback, it mentions the DotComplete plugin. Try removing this plugin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Derek Groothuis (dgroo) Date: 2003-01-21 16:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566189 Sorry - using 4.1pre8 on Windows XP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=672047&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-02-28 17:22:25
|
Bugs item #424234, was opened at 2001-05-15 10:42 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=424234&group_id=588 Category: plugins Group: normal bug >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: pressing Esc with codeaid pop open Initial Comment: when a codeaid popup is open, pressing escape generates this error: [debug] MemberPopup$KeyHandler: keyPressed source: [org.gjt.sp.jedit.textarea.JEditTextArea [,2,26,998x718,layout=org.gjt.sp.jedit.textarea.JEditTe xtArea$ScrollLayout,alignmentX=null,alignmentY=null,bor der=org.gjt.sp.jedit.textarea.JEditTextArea$TextAreaBor der@58f1fa,flags=16,maximumSize=,minimumSize=,preferred Size=]] [error] BeanShell: bsh.EvalError: Error in method invocation: Method removeSelection(int) not found in class'org.gjt.sp.jedit.textarea.JEditTextArea' : textArea .removeSelection ( textArea .getCaretPosition ( ) ) [error] BeanShell: at bsh.BSHMethodInvocation.eval (BSHMethodInvocation.java:31) [error] BeanShell: at bsh.BSHPrimaryExpression.eval (BSHPrimaryExpression.java:48) [error] BeanShell: at bsh.BSHBlock.eval (BSHBlock.java:29) [error] BeanShell: at bsh.BshMethod.invokeDeclaredMethod(BshMethod.java:101) [error] BeanShell: at bsh.BshMethod.invokeDeclaredMethod(BshMethod.java:47) [error] BeanShell: at org.gjt.sp.jedit.BeanShell.invokeMethod (BeanShell.java:314) [error] BeanShell: at org.gjt.sp.jedit.BeanShellAction.invoke (BeanShellAction.java:56) [error] BeanShell: at org.gjt.sp.jedit.gui.InputHandler.invokeAction (InputHandler.java:175) [error] BeanShell: at org.gjt.sp.jedit.gui.DefaultInputHandler.keyPressed (DefaultInputHandler.java:193) [error] BeanShell: at org.gjt.sp.jedit.View.processKeyEvent(View.java:647) [error] BeanShell: at java.awt.Component.processEvent(Unknown Source) [error] BeanShell: at java.awt.Container.processEvent(Unknown Source) [error] BeanShell: at java.awt.Window.processEvent (Unknown Source) [error] BeanShell: at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Unknown Source) [error] BeanShell: at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Unknown Source) [error] BeanShell: at java.awt.Window.dispatchEventImpl(Unknown Source) [error] BeanShell: at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Unknown Source) [error] BeanShell: at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(Unknown Source) [error] BeanShell: at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForHierarchy (Unknown Source) [error] BeanShell: at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy (Unknown Source) [error] BeanShell: at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(Unknown Source) [error] BeanShell: at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(Unknown Source) jdk1.3.1, win2k, jEdit 3.2pre1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Slava Pestov (spestov) Date: 2003-02-28 12:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=2280 out of date. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=424234&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-02-28 17:21:49
|
Bugs item #695021, was opened at 2003-02-28 07:41 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=695021&group_id=588 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Crashes when saving under Blackdown JVM Initial Comment: Intermittent failure on Jedit 4.1pre11 when saving files using the Blackdown JDK under Suse LInux. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Slava Pestov (spestov) Date: 2003-02-28 12:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=2280 More details please. What plugins are installed? Where are you saving the file? What settings are set in the Loading & Saving pane? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2003-02-28 11:38 Message: Logged In: NO Also happens under IBM JDK 1.4 and SUN JDK 1.4 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=695021&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-02-28 17:21:04
|
Bugs item #538261, was opened at 2002-04-02 06:28 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=538261&group_id=588 Category: editor core Group: minor bug >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Toolbar icons aren't always repainted Initial Comment: OS: Windows 2000 jdk: 1.4.0 [seen in jEdit 4.0 pre7- pre9] Sometimes toolbar icons aren't repainted when they should. Only the background color shows where the icons should be. When moving your mouse pointer above an invisible icon it reappears. The same problem exists also for the icons in the buffer selector and the file system browser. [seen in jEdit 4.0 pre7] The X in the docking tabs have the same problem and these won't reappear when moving the mouse pointer above them, but you need to click them to make them reappear. This "disappearing icons" problem was very much more frequent in pre7 than in pre8 and pre9, but it still exists. The problems seems to appear more frequently when bringing jEdit to the front from behind another window after using many other programs for a while. Also suspending and resuming windows can make the problem appear. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Slava Pestov (spestov) Date: 2003-02-28 12:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=2280 Java bug. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jeffrey Burns (jfburns) Date: 2002-10-15 13:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=461047 If your using alot of plugins, you may need a heap larger than the default 32 MB. This used to happen to me when JIndex loaded the documentation index. I just loaded it now: the memory status bar indicates 25 MB of a 35 MB heap now in use. Linux users can modify JAVA_HEAP_SIZE in the startup script. I believe that the jedit launcher for Windows has a spinner to set the heap size, but I may be wrong. If not, look for the -mx32m command line option and change 32 to something larger. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-10-15 11:13 Message: Logged In: NO I have seen the same problem in other Java apps on JRE 1.4.x. So I am starting to think its a Java bug. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-04-12 10:07 Message: Logged In: NO Now it happened in jEdit 4.0 final, too. I've also seen it happen to icons in the File System Browser. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-04-02 10:11 Message: Logged In: NO i've seen it also in pre7 and pre8. just got pre9, so i can't confirm. i'm also on Win2k, jdk1.4. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-04-02 09:43 Message: Logged In: NO > [seen in jEdit 4.0pre7] > The X in the docking tabs have the same problem > and these won't reappear when moving the mouse > pointer above them, but you need to click them > to make them reappear. Now it happened in 4.0pre9, too. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=538261&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-02-28 17:20:55
|
Bugs item #410138, was opened at 2001-03-20 15:05 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=410138&group_id=588 Category: editor core Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Assigned to: Slava Pestov (spestov) Summary: Meta keys wrong with Dvorak keyboard on Initial Comment: I am using jEdit on a Mac with Dvorak keyboard layout. All the meta keys are in the Qwerty location, not the Dvorak location. For example M+c becomes command-j because Querty c is Dvorak j. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-11-20 10:24 Message: Logged In: NO This is not a JEdit problem, it is Mac OS X's JVM that ignores the non-qwerty keyboard layout and it affects all Java programs on Mac OS X. It's best to just wait for Apple to fix it (I'm going to report it there if it is not already in their bug database) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gina Wilson (ginaw) Date: 2001-08-07 14:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=291834 Other than manually changing the key combinations I was wondering if there were any other solutions to this problem ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=410138&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-02-28 17:20:54
|
Bugs item #523596, was opened at 2002-02-27 16:19 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=523596&group_id=588 Category: plugins Group: normal bug Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Assigned to: Slava Pestov (spestov) Summary: Focus moves to Console after recompile Initial Comment: The focus moves from the text area to the Console after a successfule recompile made after an unsuccessful compile. This is extremely annoying. (Tested with jEdit 4.0pre6, JCompiler 1.5.0 and Console 3.1.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=523596&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-02-28 17:20:54
|
Bugs item #528821, was opened at 2002-03-12 00:26 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=528821&group_id=588 Category: plugin manager Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Assigned to: Slava Pestov (spestov) Summary: Fix loading/unloading of plugins Initial Comment: Please fix the unnoying need to restart jEdit when we load or unload plugins. The way that it can be done takes advantage of heirarchical classloaders. Basically, you have a parent classloader that takes care of all the core classes. For EACH plugin jar, you load it in its own classloader with the parent being the core classloader. Something along the lines of this: m_coreManager = this.class.getClassLoader(); m_classloaderMap = new HashMap(); // for new jars added to the system m_classloaderMap.put( pathToPlugin, new UrlClassLoader( pathToPlugin ) ); // to remove a plugin m_classloaderMap.remove( pathToPlugin ); // to update a plugin m_classloaderMap.put( pathToPlugin, new UrlClassLoader( pathToPlugin ) ); // to load a class for the plugin ClassLoader loader = (ClassLoader) m_classloaderMap.get( pathToPlugin ); Plugin pi = (Plugin) loader.loadClass( Plugin.START_CLASS ) .newInstance(); Of course, when you no longer need it, you have the plugin clean up after itself and remove the entry in the classloaderMap. We use this approach in Apache Cocoon to load dynamically generated classes at runtime. We re- compile the code any time the source is altered. We have seen this work quite well in the server arena. You should be able to use it in jEdit. BTW: URL for Apache Cocoon is http://xml.apache.org/cocoon ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=528821&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-02-28 17:20:54
|
Bugs item #534643, was opened at 2002-03-25 07:00 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=534643&group_id=588 Category: text area and syntax packages Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Assigned to: Slava Pestov (spestov) Summary: Page up/dow keys don't go with word wrap Initial Comment: Hello there, when using word wrap the page, the page up and page down keys make far too large jumps. I suppose this is because the calculation of how many lines to jump is done for real text lines (those with a number) and not for multiple lines one (numbered) line splits into when using word wrap. I use jEdit 4.0 pre 7 (just downloading pre 8 :-) with the Sun JDK 1.4.0 Bye Tobias ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Slava Pestov (spestov) Date: 2002-12-30 22:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=2280 4.1 improves this somewhat -- Scroll up/down page go with soft wrap. Page up/down will be fixed in 4.2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=534643&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-02-28 17:20:53
|
Bugs item #540024, was opened at 2002-04-05 17:34 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=540024&group_id=588 Category: editor core Group: normal bug Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Assigned to: Slava Pestov (spestov) >Summary: Undo fails to reset "modified" status Initial Comment: The following sequence involving "undo" causes jEdit to fail to reset the document's status to "unmodified" when it should: 1. Make a small modification to an unmodified file (e.g. insert a space). 2. Undo the change. 3. Redo. 4. Undo again. This sequence should reset the document to "unmodified", but it doesn't. I'm running version 4.0pre9 under Linux Mandrake 8.1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=540024&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-02-28 17:20:52
|
Bugs item #550467, was opened at 2002-04-29 22:04 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=550467&group_id=588 Category: None Group: minor bug Status: Open Resolution: Invalid Priority: 1 Submitted By: Pierre Grimaud (ignatzmouse) >Assigned to: Slava Pestov (spestov) Summary: Vertical text not properly displayed Initial Comment: Under SunOS 5.8 JDK1.3.1, the vertical text associated with the left or right docked windows is not properly displayed. It works fine under Win32 (Win2000, jdk1.4). For example, I docked "Ant Farm" and "JBrowse" in left. The two buttons does not display the name properly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pierre Grimaud (ignatzmouse) Date: 2002-10-01 14:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=530082 Ok, then let's describe a way of reproducing that. I am using WinAxe 6.1 on Windows NT 4.0, and I selected "Courier 12 plain" as the font for "Button, Menu and Label". Then after restarting jEdit, the vertical text is screwed. Also, if I check the properties again, the font displays "monospaced 12 plain" and not "courier 12 plain" anymore.... I'm running jEdit 4.1pre4 but it had the same problem with the version 4.0.3. I'm using jdk1.3 on a solaris box (SunOS 5.8 Generic_108528-13 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-60) [message] Log: When reporting bugs, please include the following information: [message] Log: java.version=1.3.0 [message] Log: java.vm.version=1.3.0 [message] Log: java.runtime.version=1.3.0 [message] Log: java.vendor=Sun Microsystems Inc. [message] Log: java.compiler=null [message] Log: os.name=SunOS [message] Log: os.version=5.8 [message] Log: os.arch=sparc [message] Log: user.home=/net/home/pierre [message] Log: java.home=/auto/usrlocal/jdk1.3/jre [message] Log: java.class.path=/net/home/pierre/bin/jedit41/jedit.jar:/net/home/pierre/lib/IgnatzPackage.jar:/net/home/pierre/metreo/weblogic/wlserver6.1/lib/weblogic.jar:/usr/local/j2sdkee1.3.1/lib/j2ee.jar:/net/home/pierre/jeditClasses:/vobs/m2/tp/struts.jar ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Slava Pestov (spestov) Date: 2002-06-05 21:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=2280 Even if it is a Swing bug I'm sure a workaround can be found. I'm re-opening the bug. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pierre Grimaud (ignatzmouse) Date: 2002-06-05 17:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=530082 It seems that some fonts does not display properly vertical text under X-Window. I don't know who handles the vertical display but I assumed that it is Swing so that's why I closed the bug. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pierre Grimaud (ignatzmouse) Date: 2002-06-05 17:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=530082 It seems that some fonts does not display properly vertical text under X-Window. I don't know who handles the vertical display but I assumed that it is Swing so that's why I closed the bug. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=550467&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-02-28 17:20:52
|
Bugs item #550820, was opened at 2002-04-30 18:37 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=550820&group_id=588 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Assigned to: Slava Pestov (spestov) Summary: Display Problem on Mac OS X Dual Monitor Initial Comment: When jEdit window is moved to the secondary monitor it doesn't work entirely properly. When resized it sets it height and width to the height and width of the screen (correct thing to do) and then sets the top of the menu bar several pixels down (wrong thing to do) seemingly to accomodate the finder menu that should be displayed at the top. Of course, since this is the second monitor there is not a finder menu at the top of the screen. Also, the window is too tal as a result (the window height does not compensate for the top being set lower). Trying to move the menu bar into the region it seems to believe is occupied by the finder menu causes the window to stutter and jump back down to the lower position. Since the window is too tall for the screen the lower right hand corner is unavailable (thus the window can't be resized to fit the screen). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-04-30 20:45 Message: Logged In: NO That is a known bug in Apple's Java implementation. Not much jEdit can do about this. Gerd ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=550820&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-02-28 17:19:27
|
Bugs item #568715, was opened at 2002-06-13 18:02 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=568715&group_id=588 Category: plugins Group: normal bug Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Assigned to: Slava Pestov (spestov) Summary: FTP plugin and VMS Initial Comment: FTP plug in does not work when trying to access VMS machines. On initial login, the FTP plugin tries to issue a "cd ./". This is Unix file path terminology, which is not legal under VMS. Specific error displayed is: Cannot list directory. ftp.FtpException:550 %RMS-F-SYN, file specification error: [./] Log file output is: [debug] FtpClient: sending command: PWD [debug] FtpClient: received response: 257 "DISK$USER4:[xxx.xxx]" [debug] ConnectionManager$Connection: Connection to boise5:21 locked [debug] ConnectionManager$Connection: Connection to boise5:21 released [debug] ConnectionManager$Connection: Connection to boise5:21 locked [debug] FtpClient: sending command: TYPE A N [debug] FtpClient: received response: 200 TYPE command okay. [debug] FtpClient: sending command: CWD / [debug] FtpClient: received response: 550 %RMS-F-SYN, file specification syntax error: [./] [debug] ConnectionManager$Connection: Connection to boise5:21 released [debug] DockableWindowManager$Entry: Adding log-viewer with position bottom [debug] ConnectionManager: Closing connection to boise5:21 [debug] FtpClient: sending command: QUIT [debug] FtpClient: received response: 221 Service closing connection. Does the "cd ./" really have to be there. Don't you automatically get placed in the users home directory upon ftp login? If the "cd ./" has to be there for some hosts, can it be made optional? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=568715&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-02-28 17:19:27
|
Bugs item #555755, was opened at 2002-05-14 00:59 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=555755&group_id=588 Category: editor core Group: normal bug Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Fan Ho Yin (beebebebebe) >Assigned to: Slava Pestov (spestov) Summary: No confirmation for deleted file on exit Initial Comment: The "File Deleted on Disk" dialog does not show up when exiting jEdit. Sometimes it does appear but gives no chance to re-save the deleted file. To reproduce this behaviour: 1) open two files 2) delete the file opened in the non-active buffer 3) close jEdit if changes have been made on the active buffer the "File Deleted on Disk" dialog will show up after the "Unsaved Changes" dialog, but it exits straight away after clicked "OK". On the other hand if no change has been made on the active buffer the "File Deleted on Disk" dialog wouldn't show up at all. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=555755&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-02-28 17:19:27
|
Bugs item #567346, was opened at 2002-06-11 06:38 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=567346&group_id=588 Category: plugins Group: normal bug Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Assigned to: Slava Pestov (spestov) Summary: FTP plugin does not lock read-only files Initial Comment: When jEdit is used for editing files in a remote host with the FTP plugin, read-only files are not locked and can be overwritten. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=567346&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-02-28 17:19:27
|
Bugs item #598505, was opened at 2002-08-21 19:13 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=598505&group_id=588 Category: editor core Group: normal bug Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Lars Hoss (woeye) >Assigned to: Slava Pestov (spestov) Summary: MacOS X + german keyboard layout prob Initial Comment: The EditAction "next-char" is assigned to Alt + L. The same keystoke is assigned to the "@" character on the Mac keyboard using german keyboard layout as well. Therefore this keystroke produces the "@" character followed by a jump to the next character. I could circumvent the problem by removing the line next-char.shortcut2=A+l from the file jedit_keys.props. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=598505&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-02-28 17:19:26
|
Bugs item #601948, was opened at 2002-08-29 11:51 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=601948&group_id=588 Category: macros Group: None Status: Open Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Assigned to: Slava Pestov (spestov) Summary: Macro Recording drops HTML code Initial Comment: When creating a "code snippet" macro under Mac OSX the macro seems to drop HTML code that I have typed while recording the macro. For example, I hit MACROS > RECORD MACRO then type something like <h3>Title</h3> then STOP RECORDING MACRO ... when I save the Macro, assign a keyboard shortcut (which by the way, I have to RESTART JEdit for the new macro to display in the shortcuts list) and then run the macro, it displays the text: <Title> as it has cut out the HTML ... If I go in, edit the macro by hand and save it again, it works fine. This may not be a bug, it may be that Macros weren't meant for this, but if they weren't, it would be a nice feature. jm...@ga... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Slava Pestov (spestov) Date: 2002-11-21 14:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=2280 Actually the main problem (broken recording of <, >, &, with XML plugin installed) still stands; it will be fixed in a future XML plugin release. I am re-opening the bug. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Gellene (jgellene) Date: 2002-11-21 10:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=117073 There has been no response to my query for some time, and the main problem seems to be solved using the Macros>Rescan Macros feature, so I am closing this report. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Gellene (jgellene) Date: 2002-10-07 22:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=117073 The Macros>Rescan Macros command will refresh the macros menu after recording a new macro. I cannot not replicate the error in the macro itself. Could you post the BeanShell code of the recorded example macro? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=601948&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-02-28 17:19:25
|
Bugs item #601965, was opened at 2002-08-29 12:33 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=601965&group_id=588 Category: editor core Group: severe bug Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jason Rosenberg (jbrosenberg) >Assigned to: Slava Pestov (spestov) >Summary: Softwrap -> jerky scrolling w/long lines Initial Comment: This is a serious problem....We are creating an XML text-editing use of the jEdit + XML plugin, where we need to markup individual paragraphs, that have no interspersed line returns..... So, each paragraph is a long line (not super long, mind you)....Anyway, the scrolling is very jerky when soft-wrap is enabled....Very difficult to navigate a document. I don't know if this is supposed to be fixed in 4.1 or not, it doesn't appear to be improved the 4.1pre4 version. I have been working with 4.0.3. In looking at the source code, it appears that it recalculates the virtual line number each time the text area is scrolled, instead of keeping a pre- formatted virtual copy of the document in memory. Not sure how complicated it would be to fix, but it quite clearly is necessary. I am new to jEdit development, but don't mind tackling this, if I could have some insight as to the potential issues... Not sure if this bug is related to bug #223174. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=601965&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-02-28 17:18:27
|
Bugs item #639930, was opened at 2002-11-18 02:30 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=639930&group_id=588 Category: search and replace Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Oliver Kitzing (oliverkitzing) >Assigned to: Slava Pestov (spestov) >Summary: JEdit doesn't find "ß" character Initial Comment: JEdit 4.1pre5 on WinXP. Type Außerdem (yes, that's german ;-) ) in a new file and try to search it. JEdit won't find it ! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=639930&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-02-28 17:18:27
|
Bugs item #667042, was opened at 2003-01-13 03:22 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=667042&group_id=588 Category: editor core Group: minor bug Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Lars Naber (nobettername) >Assigned to: Slava Pestov (spestov) Summary: File look-up case-sensitive Initial Comment: Hi, since 4.1pre the "look-up" of a file in the file-manager is case-sensitive. Example: I want to open a file, but there are two files: ABC.txt test1.txt When I type "ab", the first file is not chosen. I have to type "AB". I really don't know if it's a bug or not, but 4.0.3 didn't have this problem. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Lars Naber (nobettername) Date: 2003-01-30 09:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=686953 I'm very sorry. The stuff I wrote before is big rubbish and makes trouble when you type a filename to save. The original problem is still unsolved in 4.1pre9. Again sorry. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Lars Naber (nobettername) Date: 2003-01-27 04:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=686953 I changed in the file VFSFileChooserDialog.java lines 440-442 the ignorecase to "true": view.getTree().doTypeSelect(filenameField.getText(), true); It seems to work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Lars Naber (nobettername) Date: 2003-01-27 02:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=686953 Thanks for use answer. I'll try to be more precise now. I've done some tests. The oldest pre-version on my harddisk is 4.1pre5. It has the problem. It's still there in 4.1pre8. I attached some images. Perhaps they will help? jeditfo1.png (4.1pre8): I typed "bi" ("my normal way"), Bilbo.txt is not selected jeditfo2.png (4.1pre8): I typed "BI", Bilbo.txt is not selected jeditfo3.png (4.1pre8): I typed "Bi", Bilbo.txt is selected jeditfo4.png (4.0.3): Typed "bi"... Cursor is placed on Bilbo.txt [message] Log: java.version=1.4.0_01 [message] Log: java.vm.version=1.4.0_01-b03 [message] Log: java.runtime.version=1.4.0_01-b03 [message] Log: java.vendor=Sun Microsystems Inc. [message] Log: java.compiler=null [message] Log: os.name=Windows 95 Hope it helps... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Carmine Lucarelli (carmine) Date: 2003-01-24 14:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=189246 What number "pre" version are you using? I can't reproduce this bug with 4.1pre8. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=667042&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-02-28 17:18:27
|
Bugs item #615394, was opened at 2002-09-27 03:02 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=615394&group_id=588 Category: text area and syntax packages Group: severe bug Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Assigned to: Slava Pestov (spestov) >Summary: AT_LINE_START should apply to </END> Initial Comment: AT_LINE_START should apply to </END> or there sould be an option that it does for edit modes. This is important for perl, cause =pod IT SHOULDN't STOP at this =cut BUT THE NEXT ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=615394&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-02-28 17:18:27
|
Bugs item #641279, was opened at 2002-11-20 10:41 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=641279&group_id=588 Category: editor core Group: normal bug Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Peter Lyons (plyons) >Assigned to: Slava Pestov (spestov) Summary: Complete Word popup list ignores keyboar Initial Comment: When the Complete Word feature pops up a list of possible completions, you must dismiss this list with the mouse. You should be able to use the arrow keys to highlight entries and ENTER to insert one and dismiss the popup. ESC should dismiss the popup without inserting text. This bug severely reduces the usefulness of Complete Word. You should also be able to continue typing and narrow the list down. As an additional suggestion, I would suggest that Complete Word work more like Mac OS X's Project Builder when there is more than 1 possible completion - cycle through them with each additional hit of the keyboard command (C-b). Project Builder does this without a popup, but keeping the popup would be OK as well. JEdit 4.1 pre2 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.1-b21) Debian GNU/Linux 2.4.19 kernel ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Peter Lyons (plyons) Date: 2002-12-28 00:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=653202 Just FYI I just downloaded JEdit 4.1pre7 and this bug is still there. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=641279&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-02-28 17:18:27
|
Bugs item #648286, was opened at 2002-12-04 04:27 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=648286&group_id=588 Category: editor core Group: None Status: Open Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Rushby (woodsplitter) >Assigned to: Slava Pestov (spestov) Summary: integrated wheel mouse scrolling faulty Initial Comment: In 4.1_pre6, the integrated wheel mouse scrolling ignores system settings with regard to scrolling ('N lines at a time' vs. 'one screen at a time'). This would be no big deal if jEdit provided an option to change the scrolling behavior, but no such option is available, AFAIK. The WheelMouse plugin for jEdit 4.0.3 and earlier behaved correctly; perhaps it would be a good reference point for a bugfix? I'm using Win2000SP3 and Java 1.4.1_01. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David Rushby (woodsplitter) Date: 2002-12-25 22:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=414645 Thanks for addressing this, Slava. However, I just tried 4.1_pre7 on WinNT4/SP6a with Java 1.4.1_01, and this bug is still evident. It's not a mouse driver problem or a WinNT4 deficiency, either; native apps such as IE 6 behave properly, as do cross-platform apps such as Mozilla and jEdit 4.0.3+WheelMouse plugin. My work machine runs Windows 2000/SP3; I could try 4.1_pre7 on it and report the status of this bug on Win2000, if you'd like. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Slava Pestov (spestov) Date: 2002-12-25 16:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=2280 fixed in 4.1pre7. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=648286&group_id=588 |