You can subscribe to this list here.
| 1999 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(32) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 |
Jan
(452) |
Feb
(435) |
Mar
(117) |
Apr
(265) |
May
(161) |
Jun
(276) |
Jul
(409) |
Aug
(522) |
Sep
(139) |
Oct
(306) |
Nov
(406) |
Dec
(217) |
| 2001 |
Jan
(237) |
Feb
(194) |
Mar
(266) |
Apr
(298) |
May
(266) |
Jun
(195) |
Jul
(427) |
Aug
(660) |
Sep
(808) |
Oct
(465) |
Nov
(260) |
Dec
(226) |
| 2002 |
Jan
(255) |
Feb
(322) |
Mar
(440) |
Apr
(327) |
May
(271) |
Jun
(263) |
Jul
(122) |
Aug
(346) |
Sep
(172) |
Oct
(282) |
Nov
(184) |
Dec
(166) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(325) |
Feb
(431) |
Mar
(431) |
Apr
(238) |
May
(320) |
Jun
(331) |
Jul
(289) |
Aug
(277) |
Sep
(223) |
Oct
(273) |
Nov
(218) |
Dec
(223) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(203) |
Feb
(321) |
Mar
(316) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(44) |
Jun
(149) |
Jul
(83) |
Aug
(216) |
Sep
(188) |
Oct
(136) |
Nov
(73) |
Dec
(117) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(101) |
Feb
(208) |
Mar
(153) |
Apr
(81) |
May
(85) |
Jun
(87) |
Jul
(100) |
Aug
(145) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(123) |
Nov
(73) |
Dec
(105) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(211) |
Feb
(134) |
Mar
(299) |
Apr
(223) |
May
(292) |
Jun
(426) |
Jul
(477) |
Aug
(415) |
Sep
(501) |
Oct
(460) |
Nov
(427) |
Dec
(302) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(467) |
Feb
(423) |
Mar
(356) |
Apr
(241) |
May
(357) |
Jun
(342) |
Jul
(373) |
Aug
(421) |
Sep
(491) |
Oct
(266) |
Nov
(236) |
Dec
(310) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(228) |
Feb
(344) |
Mar
(466) |
Apr
(410) |
May
(437) |
Jun
(303) |
Jul
(255) |
Aug
(451) |
Sep
(520) |
Oct
(379) |
Nov
(430) |
Dec
(261) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(352) |
Feb
(394) |
Mar
(279) |
Apr
(534) |
May
(245) |
Jun
(392) |
Jul
(510) |
Aug
(392) |
Sep
(237) |
Oct
(332) |
Nov
(302) |
Dec
(590) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(723) |
Feb
(650) |
Mar
(530) |
Apr
(307) |
May
(300) |
Jun
(450) |
Jul
(196) |
Aug
(233) |
Sep
(270) |
Oct
(288) |
Nov
(284) |
Dec
(331) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(336) |
Feb
(277) |
Mar
(133) |
Apr
(102) |
May
(50) |
Jun
(234) |
Jul
(174) |
Aug
(274) |
Sep
(355) |
Oct
(273) |
Nov
(895) |
Dec
(749) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(744) |
Feb
(498) |
Mar
(767) |
Apr
(412) |
May
(513) |
Jun
(596) |
Jul
(372) |
Aug
(515) |
Sep
(373) |
Oct
(246) |
Nov
(210) |
Dec
(232) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(162) |
Feb
(226) |
Mar
(209) |
Apr
(162) |
May
(84) |
Jun
(153) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(142) |
Sep
(151) |
Oct
(220) |
Nov
(176) |
Dec
(131) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(61) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(93) |
Apr
(274) |
May
(83) |
Jun
(46) |
Jul
(149) |
Aug
(61) |
Sep
(49) |
Oct
(93) |
Nov
(100) |
Dec
(164) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(93) |
Feb
(130) |
Mar
(44) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(85) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(47) |
Aug
(131) |
Sep
(117) |
Oct
(115) |
Nov
(73) |
Dec
(84) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(106) |
Feb
(88) |
Mar
(116) |
Apr
(160) |
May
(121) |
Jun
(74) |
Jul
(126) |
Aug
(141) |
Sep
(101) |
Oct
(38) |
Nov
(32) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(33) |
Feb
(60) |
Mar
(112) |
Apr
(33) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(115) |
Jul
(24) |
Aug
|
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(147) |
Nov
(166) |
Dec
(118) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(53) |
Feb
(51) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(14) |
Jul
(18) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(27) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(21) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(45) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(32) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
(41) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(60) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
(26) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(67) |
Jun
(42) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(73) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(14) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(20) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
| 2022 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(25) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(27) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
|
| 2023 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(11) |
Apr
|
May
(13) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(50) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2024 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(35) |
Jun
|
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(33) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(12) |
| 2025 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1
(3) |
2
(1) |
3
(9) |
4
(14) |
5
(8) |
6
(2) |
|
7
(6) |
8
(12) |
9
(5) |
10
(7) |
11
(15) |
12
(11) |
13
(9) |
|
14
(4) |
15
(11) |
16
(3) |
17
(46) |
18
(19) |
19
(20) |
20
(2) |
|
21
(12) |
22
(33) |
23
(30) |
24
(59) |
25
(44) |
26
(13) |
27
(8) |
|
28
(6) |
29
(14) |
30
(35) |
31
(6) |
|
|
|
|
From: Alan E. <ala...@gm...> - 2007-01-31 17:21:29
|
Much better! Now i can run python interactive help() inside jedit's console, and also gdb. Thanks again! --alan On 1/30/07, va...@us... <va...@us...> wrote: > Revision: 8820 > http://svn.sourceforge.net/jedit/?rev=8820&view=rev > Author: vanza > Date: 2007-01-30 22:21:39 -0800 (Tue, 30 Jan 2007) > > Log Message: > ----------- > now yes, a proper fix to the jerkiness problem in Console's output that doesn't break applications that sometimes don't write full lines (e.g., a prompt in an interactive app). To try out the improvement, run "gdb" and type "help" and see it scroll. Or run ant on a project that prints a lot of stuff. > > Modified Paths: > -------------- > plugins/Console/trunk/console/StreamThread.java > > Modified: plugins/Console/trunk/console/StreamThread.java > =================================================================== > --- plugins/Console/trunk/console/StreamThread.java 2007-01-30 21:51:05 UTC (rev 8819) > +++ plugins/Console/trunk/console/StreamThread.java 2007-01-31 06:21:39 UTC (rev 8820) > @@ -90,29 +90,35 @@ > try > { > StringBuilder lb = new StringBuilder(); > - do > + char[] input = new char[1024]; > + int written = 0; > + while (!aborted) > { > - int dat = isr.read(); > - if(dat == -1 || aborted) break; > + int read = isr.read(input, 0, input.length); > + if (read == -1 || aborted) break; > + for (int i = 0; i < read; i++) > + { > + char c = input[i]; > + if (oldchar != '\r' || c != '\n') > + { > + lb.append(c); > + } > + if((c == '\n' && oldchar != '\r') || c == '\r') > + { > > - char c = (char)dat; > - > - if((c == '\n' && oldchar != '\r') || c == '\r') > + process(lb, output, written); > + written = 0; > + } > + oldchar = c; > + } > + if (lb.length() > 0) > { > - String _line = lb.toString(); > - copt.processLine(_line); > - int length = _line.length(); > - output.setAttrs(length, ConsolePane.colorAttributes(copt.getColor())); > - lb = new StringBuilder(); > + process(lb, output, written); > + written = lb.length(); > } > > - if(c != '\r') > - { > - if(c != '\n') lb.append(c); > - output.writeAttrs(null, "" + c); > - } > - oldchar = c; > - } while (!aborted); > + } > + > } > catch (Exception e) > { > @@ -151,5 +157,40 @@ > aborted = true; > interrupt(); > } // }}} > + > + // {{{ process() method > + private void process(StringBuilder buf, Output output, int written) > + { > + assert (buf != null && buf.length() > 0) : "buffer is empty"; > + String _line = buf.toString(); > + int length = _line.length(); > + int end = length; > + > + // we need to write the line break to the output, but we > + // can't pass it to the "processLine()" method or the > + // regexps won't recognize anything. > + if (_line.charAt(length -1) == '\n' || _line.charAt(length -1) == '\r') > + { > + end--; > + } > + > + if (end == length) > + { > + copt.processLine(_line); > + } > + else > + { > + copt.processLine(_line.substring(0, end)); > + } > + > + output.writeAttrs(null, _line.substring(written)); > + output.setAttrs(end, ConsolePane.colorAttributes(copt.getColor())); > + if (end != length) > + { > + // empty the buffer if we've read a line. > + buf.setLength(0); > + } > + } //}}} > + > } // }}} > > > > This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development platform, the world's largest Open Source development site. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > jEdit-CVS mailing list > jEd...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jedit-cvs > |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-31 16:47:14
|
Patches item #1649033, was opened at 2007-02-01 01:47 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300588&aid=1649033&group_id=588 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Kazutoshi Satoda (k_satoda) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Correct the focus after choosing the directory to search Initial Comment: After choosing the directory to search via [Choose...] button in [Search And Replace] dialog, the view is focused and [Search And Replace] dialog becomes inactive. I can't find the way to set focus back using keyboard. So I'm forced to use the mouse. Keyboard shortcut for action 'find' brings [Search And Replace] dialog up. But then, all settings are reset. This patch will solve the above problem. I would like to work with less use of the mouse, don't you? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300588&aid=1649033&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-31 15:05:58
|
Bugs item #1648955, was opened at 2007-01-31 16:05 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=1648955&group_id=588 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: search and replace Group: severe bug Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: mathias_tx (mathias_tx) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Freeze with big regex Initial Comment: Hi, I searched for the following regex in a file. ---sart regex---- ( {3}|LU6)( |CVT|PCT).{3}(I|C).{6}.{6}.{11}(A|B|C)(A|D).{11}(A|B|C).{12}I.{3}(P|T)\d{15},\d{3}\d{6},\d{8}000001,000000.{1}.{16}EUR\d{4}(0[1-9]|1[0-2])(0[1-9]|[1-2][0-9]|3[0-1]).{6}\d{4}(0[1-9]|1[0-2])(0[1-9]|[1-2][0-9]|3[0-1]).{8}( {8}|\d{2},\d{5}).{10}.{8}.{6}.{11}.{1}.{11}.{1}.{2}.{4}.{35}.{11}.{1}.{10}( |E|C)(T|P).{10}(C|E)(F|C| )(E|C|N| ).{1}.{16}.{2}.{14}.{8}( {15}|\d{6},\d{8})(E|C|N| )( {13}|\d{6},\d{6})( {8}|\d{2},\d{5})( {8}|\d{4}(0[1-9]|1[0-2])(0[1-9]|[1-2][0-9]|3[0-1]))( {8}|\d{4}(0[1-9]|1[0-2])(0[1-9]|[1-2][0-9]|3[0-1])).{61} ---end regex--- jEdit takes 100% CPU forever, I have to kill it. jEdit 4.3pre9, jdk 1.5.0_11, windows XP. regards, Mathias ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=1648955&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-31 10:28:53
|
Plugin Bugs item #1590239, was opened at 2006-11-03 23:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by murkles You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=565475&aid=1590239&group_id=588 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Private: No Submitted By: Alan Ezust (ezust) Assigned to: Mark Wickens (murkles) Summary: JDiff: Window Scrolling is screwed up by softwrapped lines. Initial Comment: After fixing the TextArea vs JEditTextArea related compiler errors in JDiff, I noticed that the right hand side seems to be one screen further down than the left side, and so I can't really see what it is comparing side-by-side anymore. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Wickens (murkles) Date: 2007-01-31 10:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=248701 Originator: NO Yes, you are right, sorry, this is still a problem... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alan Ezust (ezust) Date: 2006-12-14 04:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=935841 Originator: YES true. i released jdiff plugin 1.5.1, which contains a small bugfix for working with jedit 4.3pre8. but it still exhibits the behavior (accumulation of off-by-1 errors for wrapped lines when the two panes aren't exactly the same width, and you have soft wrap). Are you saying you don't see this behavior with 1.5.1? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Wickens (murkles) Date: 2006-11-15 08:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=248701 Originator: NO Looks like someone's beaten me to it - see http://plugins.jedit.org/plugins/?JDiffPlugin http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/jedit-plugins/JDiffPlugin-1.5.1.zip ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Wickens (murkles) Date: 2006-11-15 07:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=248701 Originator: NO I'll have a look at this... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alan Ezust (ezust) Date: 2006-11-08 06:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=935841 Any volunteers to look at this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alan Ezust (ezust) Date: 2006-11-03 23:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=935841 This bug seems to be related to soft-wrap - either side has wrapped lines, the line count seems to be off. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=565475&aid=1590239&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-31 06:29:29
|
Bugs item #1648497, was opened at 2007-01-31 07:29 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=1648497&group_id=588 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: editor core Group: normal bug Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Peter Allin (peterallin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Failing screen updated on high editor window Initial Comment: I'm using jEdit in a dual monitor setup. Sometimes I rotate one of the monitors in order to use jEdit in a high window. When I maximise the window I get some problems with the update of the display. For example the red floppy disk icon, that indicates a dirty buffer, isn't drawn when I change something in the buffer. If I click on the buffer name that part of the screen is updated and the icon appears. There's also some problems with the screen update in the textarea itself. If I un-minimize the window the problem goes away. If I resize it the problem comes back when I make the window too high. I don't know the exact number of pixels, but when the window height takes about 90% of the screen height the problem appears. If I split the window into two views (ie. presses C+2) the problems doesn't occur. My setup: - Windows XP - jEdit 4.2final - Java: Sun JVM 1.5.0_09-b03 - 2 1280*1024 monitors, one of which is rotated (the problem is on the rotated one) - Graphics hardware is an NVIDIA Quadro FX3450/4000 SDI (the screen rotation is handled by the NVRotate feature of the driver for this card) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=1648497&group_id=588 |
|
From: <car...@lo...> - 2007-01-31 00:45:50
|
Hello all. Can't seem to commit to SVN (first time trying). Do I need to be= = added to some access control list=3F If so, I need access to = plugins/ShortcutSaver, plugins/MacroManager and I'd like to create a new = plugin as well.<br><br>user name: carmine<br><br>Thanks,<br>Carmine<br><br> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- This email is confidential.=20 If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by return email and delete this message =66rom your mail box without reading or copying it or=20 any attachments. While Lombard Canada Ltd. runs=20 anti-virus software on all servers and all PCs, it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. Lombard Canada Ltd. advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-30 23:46:37
|
Bugs item #1013608, was opened at 2004-08-22 02:41 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rschwenn You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=1013608&group_id=588 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: dbareis (dbareis) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Highlight Current Line - Doesn't always Initial Comment: Hi, I'm using 4.2 PRE 14. If I use the find dialog to search for something the matching line is not highlighted making it at times very hard to locate where the match is (small strings etc). If I then exit the dialog the line is STILL unhighlighted. If I then press any key (such as right arrow) the line becomes highlighted. Bye, Dennis ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Robert Schwenn (rschwenn) Date: 2007-01-31 00:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1486645 Originator: NO Windows XP SP2 SUN JRE 1.5.0_10-b03 jEdit 4.3pre9 As of 4.3preX, when there is a single selection inbetween one line, the line is highlithed. In all other cases of selections the line that contains the caret is not highlighted - but the number of this line in the gutter is highlighted. May be it was be nice to see the line with the caret highlited in every case. But is this a bug? -> Setting status to pending. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: dbareis (dbareis) Date: 2004-08-25 09:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=253196 OK, fair enough, but 2 points: 1. Why? I'd always like to know where I am. The highlighting would start and stop where the mark is. The highlighing could go into the line number info I have on the left. I'd be happy if only the line column (whatever its called!) were highlighted. 2. At least during find I'd expect the highlighting to occur. The whole point of highlighting is that it is too hard to workout where the current position is otherwise. Between the highlight and the excelent ruler functionality I normaly don't have an issue. If I was searching for long strings again it would be relatively easy to spot, try looking for a semicolon or other small string. Bye, dennis ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Slava Pestov (spestov) Date: 2004-08-24 20:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=2280 Line highlight is not shown if there is a selection. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=1013608&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-30 23:15:50
|
Bugs item #979086, was opened at 2004-06-24 18:46 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rschwenn You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=979086&group_id=588 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: installer Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Brant Gurganus (brantgurga) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: installation is allowed with blank path Initial Comment: jEdit 4.2pre14 installation is allowed despite a blank path. This results in installation to the root of my drive without explicitly telling jEdit's installer to put jEdit there. Procedure: 1. Start installer. 2. On the installation location page, make the path field blank. 3. Click Next. Expected Results: Continuance should be disallowed until the path enterred is valid and present. Actual Results: The wizard allows me to continue. Further Details: If the wizard is completed, jEdit gets installed to my drive's root. This was discovered while creating the Omit Path test in the TestMatrix on the wiki: http://community.jedit.org/cgi-bin/TWiki/view/Main/TestMatrix. OS: Windows 2000 JVM: Sun's Java2 Runtime Environment 1.4.2_04 The place where this can most likely be fixed is in SwingInstall.java or InstallThread.java. I would recommend using an InputVerifier on the JTextField. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Robert Schwenn (rschwenn) Date: 2007-01-31 00:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1486645 Originator: NO Windows XP SP2 SUN JRE 1.5.0_10-b03 jEdit 4.3pre9 This bug occurs only in the java based installer. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=979086&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-30 23:09:53
|
Bugs item #917669, was opened at 2004-03-16 23:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rschwenn You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=917669&group_id=588 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: installer Group: normal bug >Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: "Program files" seems to be hardcoded Initial Comment: When installing jEdit under Windows 2000 SP 4/JRE 1.4.2, the jEdit installs itself in c:\program files\jedit... directory, although in german version of W2K for example, the path for program files is "c:\programme" by default. I think that somewhere in installer this value is hard- coded and now dynamically retrieved from Windows-API. ----- Esad Hajdarevic esa...@25... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Robert Schwenn (rschwenn) Date: 2007-01-31 00:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1486645 Originator: NO Sorry, forgot to test the java based installer. This one has the bug yet (4.3pre9). On NT based systems the installer could try to get and expand the environment variable %ProgramFiles% instead of reading the registry. Windows XP SP2 SUN JRE 1.5.0_10-b03 jEdit 4.3pre9 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Robert Schwenn (rschwenn) Date: 2007-01-30 23:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1486645 Originator: NO Windows XP SP2 SUN JRE 1.5.0_10-b03 The windows intaller both for jedit 4.2 final and 4.3 pre9 let the user choose a directory. The default target is the correct expanded folder %ProgramFiles%\jEdit\ (tested with german version: "c:\programme\jEdit"). Althougt the system is not the same like that where the bug was seen, I think it's fixed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=917669&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-30 22:56:55
|
Bugs item #976590, was opened at 2004-06-21 10:43 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rschwenn You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=976590&group_id=588 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: search and replace Group: minor bug Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Radu GRIGORE (radugrigore) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: selection changed by replace operation Initial Comment: If a selection overflows the end of file (which is possible with a "vertical" selection, i.e. pressing CTRL while dragging mouse) and you do a replace operation in that selection the result is that after correct replacements are done the selection is moved to another position. This can be annoying when you need to do multiple replacements in the same area because you need to be careful not to select the last line. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Robert Schwenn (rschwenn) Date: 2007-01-30 23:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1486645 Originator: NO jEdit 4.3pre9 SUN JRE 1.5.0_10-b03 WinXP SP2 In general the selection seems to change (after replace in selection), if beginning or end of a rectangular selection is placed in part behind the end of a line and the caret is also placed there. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=976590&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-30 22:36:02
|
Bugs item #950961, was opened at 2004-05-09 23:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rschwenn You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=950961&group_id=588 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: editor core Group: minor bug Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 6 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Folding: handling newlines at the start of closed folds Initial Comment: Here is the example text folded using explicit folding: 1| //{{{ 2| Folding 3| Test 4| Case 5| //}}} 6| Other text which folds to: 1| //{{{ [4 lines] 6| Other text By placing the caret after the last brace and pressing return we get the following result: 1| //{{{ 2| New text entered 7| Other text In the editor the fold is now showen as unfolded, but the text within the fold is not displayed. To display the contents of the fold you have to close the fold and open it again which then would display the expected text: 1| //{{{ 2| New text entered 3| Folding 4| Test 5| Case 6| //}}} 7| Other text This error appears to exist with any folding plugin, not just explicit folding. Secondly, with explict folding only, placing the caret between the braces that make up the start of the fold whilst folded and pressing return causes the fold to be 'lost'. As in the space taken up by the fold is still indicated by jEdit but the fold is no longer displayed: 1| //{{ 2| ^{ 7| Other text There are three ways to get the fold back. 1) Delete the new line and whitespace entered. This returns the fold in a closed position 2) Add new braces to complete the fold marker. This adds the fold in an open position but without the origenal text displayed. Closing and reopening the fold corrects this, the same as the first bug. 3) Reopen the file KeeperOfTheSoul <ex...@dy...> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Robert Schwenn (rschwenn) Date: 2007-01-30 23:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1486645 Originator: NO jEdit 4.3pre9: still occurs Because "{{{" is the beginning of the fold, I find it's ok to create a new line under "{{{" when hitting ENTER there. But to avoid confusion the fold should be expanded automatically in this case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brad Mace (bemace) Date: 2006-03-22 16:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=370261 This still occurs in 4.3pre3. I'd expect hitting 'enter' at the end of a collapsed fold line would create a new line after the fold, rather than inside the fold. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=950961&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-30 22:17:09
|
Bugs item #917669, was opened at 2004-03-16 23:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rschwenn You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=917669&group_id=588 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: installer Group: normal bug >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: "Program files" seems to be hardcoded Initial Comment: When installing jEdit under Windows 2000 SP 4/JRE 1.4.2, the jEdit installs itself in c:\program files\jedit... directory, although in german version of W2K for example, the path for program files is "c:\programme" by default. I think that somewhere in installer this value is hard- coded and now dynamically retrieved from Windows-API. ----- Esad Hajdarevic esa...@25... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Robert Schwenn (rschwenn) Date: 2007-01-30 23:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1486645 Originator: NO Windows XP SP2 SUN JRE 1.5.0_10-b03 The windows intaller both for jedit 4.2 final and 4.3 pre9 let the user choose a directory. The default target is the correct expanded folder %ProgramFiles%\jEdit\ (tested with german version: "c:\programme\jEdit"). Althougt the system is not the same like that where the bug was seen, I think it's fixed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=917669&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-30 22:02:54
|
Plugin Central Submission item #1646041, was opened at 2007-01-27 18:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sune_simonsen You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=625093&aid=1646041&group_id=588 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Sune Simonsen (sune_simonsen) Assigned to: Jeffrey Hoyt (jchoyt) Summary: SuperAbbrevs 0.25 Initial Comment: {{{ SuperAbbrevs 0.23 Source: Source code is in CVS|SVN with the tag plugins/SuperAbbrevs/tags/version0.25 Announcement: This is the third release of SuperAbbrevs. This is a small release, I fixed some bugs and added primitive import/export of abbreviations based on a patch from Eric Berry. Requires Java 1.4.2 Requires jEdit 04.02.99.00 Short Description: This plug-in enables you to tab-expand an abbreviation with variables in it.After the abbreviation is expanded, you can use the tab-key to jump betweenthe variables. If you change the content of a variable in the abbreviation,all the variables with the same name will change accordingly. This concept is previously know from Eclipse and TextMate. Long Description: <p> This plug-in enables you to <i>tab</i>-expand an abbreviation with variables in it. After the abbreviation is expanded, you can use the <i>tab</i>-key to jump between the variables. If you change the content of a variable in the abbreviation, all the variables with the same name will change accordingly. It is also possible to make variables that changes their content depending on the content of another variable. The user can define his own abbreviation for each mode supported by jEdit in the SuperAbbrevs option-pane. </p> <p> This concept is previously know from <a href="http://www.eclipse.org/">Eclipse</a> and <a href="http://www.macromates.com/">TextMate</a>. </p> }}} ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Sune Simonsen (sune_simonsen) Date: 2007-01-30 23:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1316416 Originator: YES Hi jchoyt I'm sorry you were actually right, there was a dependency on java 1.5. I removed this dependency so the plugin should now build with java 1.4. I also removed the compile time dependency on ctags-exuberant for the dist target. Lastly I made it very easy to compile the plugin, just change the path in the property file for your platform and run the setup target for your platform: ant setup-mac ant setup-linux ant setup-windows Then run the dist target. Hope this helps ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sune Simonsen (sune_simonsen) Date: 2007-01-30 07:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1316416 Originator: YES That just things you need to compile the plugin, not runtime dependencies. As is the plugin should compile an Java 1.4.0 jar file and I will fix the build.xml file to not depend on the ctags executalbe for the dist target. I asked the mailing list what jEdit dependency a plugin should have if it both compatible with jEdit 4.3pre and jEdit 4.2, but I never got an ansver. Hope this clears some things up. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jeffrey Hoyt (jchoyt) Date: 2007-01-30 03:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=396194 Originator: NO Please fix submission and change state back to "open". Neither the properties file, nor your submission, mention a dependency on ctags-exuberant, and you have a java requirement of 1.4, when the build.xml file states you need Java 5 and fails without the ctags-exuberant executable. In the wake of recent emails, please also verify the jEdit version you want this built to is 4.2final. Thanks, Jeff ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sune Simonsen (sune_simonsen) Date: 2007-01-27 18:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1316416 Originator: YES Ups {{{SuperAbbrevs 0.23 should have been {{{SuperAbbrevs 0.25 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=625093&aid=1646041&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-30 21:41:49
|
Bugs item #737187, was opened at 2003-05-13 19:26 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rschwenn You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=737187&group_id=588 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: text area and syntax packages Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: method name not highlighted allways Initial Comment: If there is a space or more between the method name and the opened brace the method name doesn't appear highlighted. The same by method call. jEdit version: 4.1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Robert Schwenn (rschwenn) Date: 2007-01-30 22:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1486645 Originator: NO Now (jEdit 4.3pre9) the MARK_PREVIOUS tag seems to match text consisting of more than one character. With the attached mode file method names with one (or zero) spacees between method name and opening brace will be highlighted. I'm not sure about the amount and kind (tabs?) of allowed whitespace. This should be not hard to justify (see lines 80-86). Would a java freak check this? File Added: java.xml ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mirco Bova (starglider) Date: 2003-09-10 13:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=419912 The problem is in the mode xml. for languages like C or JAVA the FUNCTION keywords are defined using a MARK_PREVIOUS tag which does allow only of single characters matching. A new property for the MARK_PREVIOUS tag like IGNORE_LEADING_WHITESPACES could eliminate the problem ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=737187&group_id=588 |
|
From: Jeffrey H. <jc...@gm...> - 2007-01-30 21:02:35
|
Please talk to the current owner of the JakartaCommons plugin to see if it
makes sense. Also, who else is using tar and activation? Oh, and you DID
check the licenses, right? For a while Sun wouldn't let you redistribute
activation.jar.....
If it does make sense to modify JakartaCommons, you can leave it in CVS if
you want. The move to SVN is optional.
Jeff
On 1/30/07, car...@lo... <car...@lo...>
wrote:
>
>
>
> Okay. So I need to add activation.jar and tar.jar to JakartaCommons.
>
> That means I should release a new JakartaCommons version (moving it to svn
> in the process) and have my plugin depend on the latest version of that
> plugin?
>
> It's a bit more work, but makes sense.
>
> Thanks,
> Carmine
>
>
> "Jeffrey Hoyt" <jc...@gm...> wrote on 01/30/2007 01:18:55 PM:
>
> > It's generally easier for the packagers to put the jar files in a
> > lib directory and check them into CVS/SVN. If you feel there's a
> > compelling reason to not do this, let us know. A couple guidelines:
> >
> > 1) make sure you aren't duplicating a library another plugin is also
> > adding - they can stomp in each other that way, and the library
> > should be added to an existing package (such as Jakarta Commons or
> > Common Controls) or create a new one.
> >
> > 2) make sure if you need the library packaged with your plugin that
> > the dist target in your build file copies them to ${install.dir} -
> > that's where the packaging scripts grab them from.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Jeff
>
> > On 1/30/07, car...@lo... <car...@lo...
> > > wrote:
> >
> > When there are libraries I need to release along with a plugin, should I
> > upload the files, attaching them to the plugin tracker item?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Carmine
> >
> >
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > This email is confidential.
> > If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
> > the sender by return email and delete this message
> > from your mail box without reading or copying it or
> > any attachments. While Lombard Canada Ltd. runs
> > anti-virus software on all servers and all PCs, it
> > cannot be held responsible for any infected files that
> > you may receive. Lombard Canada Ltd. advises all
> > recipients to virus scan any file attachments.
> >
>
> ==============================================================================
>
> >
> >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> >
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > --
> > -----------------------------------------------
> > jEdit Developers' List
> > jEd...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jedit-devel
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> > safety deserve neither.
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> --
> -----------------------------------------------
> jEdit Developers' List
> jEd...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jedit-devel
>
--
They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither.
|
|
From: <car...@lo...> - 2007-01-30 19:30:57
|
Okay. So I need to add activation.jar and tar.jar to JakartaCommons.
That means I should release a new JakartaCommons version (moving it to svn
in the process) and have my plugin depend on the latest version of that
plugin?
It's a bit more work, but makes sense.
Thanks,
Carmine
"Jeffrey Hoyt" <jc...@gm...> wrote on 01/30/2007 01:18:55 PM:
> It's generally easier for the packagers to put the jar files in a
> lib directory and check them into CVS/SVN. If you feel there's a
> compelling reason to not do this, let us know. A couple guidelines:
>
> 1) make sure you aren't duplicating a library another plugin is also
> adding - they can stomp in each other that way, and the library
> should be added to an existing package (such as Jakarta Commons or
> Common Controls) or create a new one.
>
> 2) make sure if you need the library packaged with your plugin that
> the dist target in your build file copies them to ${install.dir} -
> that's where the packaging scripts grab them from.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jeff
> On 1/30/07, car...@lo... <car...@lo...
> > wrote:
>
> When there are libraries I need to release along with a plugin, should I
> upload the files, attaching them to the plugin tracker item?
>
> Thanks,
> Carmine
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This email is confidential.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
> the sender by return email and delete this message
> from your mail box without reading or copying it or
> any attachments. While Lombard Canada Ltd. runs
> anti-virus software on all servers and all PCs, it
> cannot be held responsible for any infected files that
> you may receive. Lombard Canada Ltd. advises all
> recipients to virus scan any file attachments.
>
==============================================================================
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> --
> -----------------------------------------------
> jEdit Developers' List
> jEd...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jedit-devel
>
>
>
> --
> They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> safety deserve neither.
|
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-30 19:10:21
|
Plugin Central Submission item #1646939, was opened at 2007-01-29 11:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hertzhaft You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=625093&aid=1646939&group_id=588 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Martin Raspe (hertzhaft) Assigned to: Jeffrey Hoyt (jchoyt) Summary: PerlSideKick 0.6 Initial Comment: PerlSideKick 0.6 Requirements: * jdk 1.5 * jEdit 4.3pre3 * SideKick plugin 0.5 * ErrorList plugin 1.3.1 Announcement: release 0.6 Source: https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/jedit/plugins/PerlSideKick Short Description: A sidekick parser for Perl. Long Description: This sidekick plugin parses Perl source and analyzes it, using regular expressions (an excentric programming style will probably confuse the plugin). For each package a tree branch is built. It shows package name, "used" and "required" modules and sub names. Mind that the branches do not reflect the order of subs in the source code, but are sorted by package and sub names. Additionally all POD headlines are listed in their natural order. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Martin Raspe (hertzhaft) Date: 2007-01-30 20:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1037294 Originator: YES Sorry, I wasn't aware of the macro. Here is the info {{{ PerlSideKick 0.6 Source: Source code is in SVN with the tag https://jedit.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/jedit/plugins/PerlSideKick/tags/release-0_6 Announcement: Version 0.6 Bug fixes and better adaptation to newer versions of SideKick Requires Java 1.5 Requires jEdit 04.03.03.00 Required plugins: sidekick.SideKickPlugin 0.5 errorlist.ErrorListPlugin 1.3.1 Short Description: A simple perl parser for use with the SideKick plugin. Long Description: <html> <p> This sidekick plugin parses Perl source and analyzes it, using regular expressions (an excentric programming style will probably confuse the plugin). For each package a tree branch is built. It shows package name, "used" and "required" modules and sub names. Mind that the branches do not reflect the order of subs in the source code, but are sorted by package and sub names. Additionally all POD headlines are listed in their natural order. </p> </html> }}} ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jeffrey Hoyt (jchoyt) Date: 2007-01-30 03:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=396194 Originator: NO Please fix submission and change status back to "Open". 1) Please tag the version and let me know what it is. 2) Please provide a bit more announcement than "release 0.6"\ 3) Since you aren't using the "Create Plugin Announcement" macro, please double check your stated requirements are reflected in the .props file. Thanks, Jeff ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=625093&aid=1646939&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-30 19:09:50
|
Feature Requests item #1645528, was opened at 2007-01-26 10:48 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by ezust You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350588&aid=1645528&group_id=588 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: core Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Alan Ezust (ezust) Assigned to: Alan Ezust (ezust) Summary: Perspective saver: option to ignore remote VFS files Initial Comment: If I have files open from the sql: vfs, or even the sftp:// vfs, it would be nice if the perspective saver could ignore those files but remember all my local files. I'd like a checkbox that lets me switch this behavior (restoring sftp:// and sql:// files in perspective) off. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alan Ezust (ezust) Date: 2007-01-30 11:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=935841 Originator: YES Fixed in 8810. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350588&aid=1645528&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-30 19:09:23
|
Feature Requests item #1646151, was opened at 2007-01-27 13:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ezust You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350588&aid=1646151&group_id=588 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: plugins Group: None >Status: Deleted >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Sergey V. Udaltsov (svu) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: XML Plugin: RELAX NG support Initial Comment: It would be nice to have support for relax ng document definition: 1. Highlighting the syntax (both RNG and RNC) 2. Validating XML documents againtst specified RELAX NG definition ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Alan Ezust (ezust) Date: 2007-01-30 11:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=935841 Originator: NO Dupe of 1465879. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sergey V. Udaltsov (svu) Date: 2007-01-27 13:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=681 Originator: YES Autocompletion in XML documents would be nice to have as well, of course ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350588&aid=1646151&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-30 19:07:54
|
Feature Requests item #1645528, was opened at 2007-01-26 10:48 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ezust You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350588&aid=1645528&group_id=588 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: core Group: None Status: Open >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Alan Ezust (ezust) >Assigned to: Alan Ezust (ezust) Summary: Perspective saver: option to ignore remote VFS files Initial Comment: If I have files open from the sql: vfs, or even the sftp:// vfs, it would be nice if the perspective saver could ignore those files but remember all my local files. I'd like a checkbox that lets me switch this behavior (restoring sftp:// and sql:// files in perspective) off. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Alan Ezust (ezust) Date: 2007-01-30 11:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=935841 Originator: YES Fixed in 8810. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350588&aid=1645528&group_id=588 |
|
From: Jeffrey H. <jc...@gm...> - 2007-01-30 18:19:10
|
It's generally easier for the packagers to put the jar files in a lib
directory and check them into CVS/SVN. If you feel there's a compelling
reason to not do this, let us know. A couple guidelines:
1) make sure you aren't duplicating a library another plugin is also adding
- they can stomp in each other that way, and the library should be added to
an existing package (such as Jakarta Commons or Common Controls) or create a
new one.
2) make sure if you need the library packaged with your plugin that the dist
target in your build file copies them to ${install.dir} - that's where the
packaging scripts grab them from.
Regards,
Jeff
On 1/30/07, car...@lo... <car...@lo...>
wrote:
>
>
> When there are libraries I need to release along with a plugin, should I
> upload the files, attaching them to the plugin tracker item?
>
> Thanks,
> Carmine
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This email is confidential.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
> the sender by return email and delete this message
> from your mail box without reading or copying it or
> any attachments. While Lombard Canada Ltd. runs
> anti-virus software on all servers and all PCs, it
> cannot be held responsible for any infected files that
> you may receive. Lombard Canada Ltd. advises all
> recipients to virus scan any file attachments.
>
> ==============================================================================
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> --
> -----------------------------------------------
> jEdit Developers' List
> jEd...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jedit-devel
>
--
They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither.
|
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-30 17:40:12
|
Bugs item #1623660, was opened at 2006-12-28 06:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ezust You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=1623660&group_id=588 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Pending >Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Brian Williams (mixolyde) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Menus appear on wrong monitor in dual monitor setup Initial Comment: I'm using an IBM thinkpad with a dual monitor setup in WinXP. My desk monitor is a standard LCD, which is on the left side of the laptop monitor. The LCD is at 1280, and the laptop at 1024. When the jEdit window is in the left screen, the secondary, and i click on the menu buttons, the menus appear on the right screen all the way to the left. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Alan Ezust (ezust) Date: 2007-01-30 09:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=935841 Originator: NO If you are talking about the context menu that you get when you right-click in the jedit text area, this does not happen in 4.3pre9. If you are talking about pulldown menus from the View, that also works for me. Closing this since there is not enough information. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alan Ezust (ezust) Date: 2006-12-28 08:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=935841 Originator: NO What do you mean by "menus" in that context? pulldown menus from the menu bar, or right-click context menu from the text area, or what? Please describe the steps you used to reproduce. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=1623660&group_id=588 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-30 17:37:23
|
Patches item #1647934, was opened at 2007-01-30 06:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ezust You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300588&aid=1647934&group_id=588 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Jakub Roztocil (oswaldcz) >Assigned to: Alan Ezust (ezust) Summary: XML Plugin - two new actions Initial Comment: This patch adds two new actions to the XML Plugin: 1. "Select Element or Code Block" - this is analogy of the existing "Go to Matching Tag or Bracket" action. 2. "Selection Between Tags" Both actions can be invoked repeatedly, then selects parent of selected element resp. text between parent's tags. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Alan Ezust (ezust) Date: 2007-01-30 09:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=935841 Originator: NO committed to rev# 8804. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jakub Roztocil (oswaldcz) Date: 2007-01-30 06:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1504176 Originator: YES I forgot to attach the file... File Added: XML-plugin-revision-8799.patch ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300588&aid=1647934&group_id=588 |
|
From: <car...@lo...> - 2007-01-30 17:33:16
|
When there are libraries I need to release along with a plugin, should I upload the files, attaching them to the plugin tracker item? Thanks, Carmine ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by return email and delete this message from your mail box without reading or copying it or any attachments. While Lombard Canada Ltd. runs anti-virus software on all servers and all PCs, it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. Lombard Canada Ltd. advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ============================================================================== |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-01-30 17:08:35
|
Bugs item #1260023, was opened at 2005-08-15 09:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ezust You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=1260023&group_id=588 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Wendy Smoak (wsmoak) >Assigned to: Kazutoshi Satoda (k_satoda) Summary: HyperSearch Results does not lose focus on enter Initial Comment: With the HyperSearch Results floating, pressing enter on a particular line does not give focus to the main JEdit window. You have to hit alt-tab to get back. This is in contrast to left-clicking a line in the Results, which does scroll the buffer to that line and give focus to the main JEdit window. 4.3pre2 on Windows XP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Alan Ezust (ezust) Date: 2007-01-30 09:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=935841 Originator: NO committed to svn rev 8803. Thanks, Kazutoshi!! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kazutoshi Satoda (k_satoda) Date: 2007-01-30 06:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1483238 Originator: NO There is a patch which will fix this problem. https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1646058&group_id=588&atid=300588 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=1260023&group_id=588 |