You can subscribe to this list here.
| 1999 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(32) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 |
Jan
(452) |
Feb
(435) |
Mar
(117) |
Apr
(265) |
May
(161) |
Jun
(276) |
Jul
(409) |
Aug
(522) |
Sep
(139) |
Oct
(306) |
Nov
(406) |
Dec
(217) |
| 2001 |
Jan
(237) |
Feb
(194) |
Mar
(266) |
Apr
(298) |
May
(266) |
Jun
(195) |
Jul
(427) |
Aug
(660) |
Sep
(808) |
Oct
(465) |
Nov
(260) |
Dec
(226) |
| 2002 |
Jan
(255) |
Feb
(322) |
Mar
(440) |
Apr
(327) |
May
(271) |
Jun
(263) |
Jul
(122) |
Aug
(346) |
Sep
(172) |
Oct
(282) |
Nov
(184) |
Dec
(166) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(325) |
Feb
(431) |
Mar
(431) |
Apr
(238) |
May
(320) |
Jun
(331) |
Jul
(289) |
Aug
(277) |
Sep
(223) |
Oct
(273) |
Nov
(218) |
Dec
(223) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(203) |
Feb
(321) |
Mar
(316) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(44) |
Jun
(149) |
Jul
(83) |
Aug
(216) |
Sep
(188) |
Oct
(136) |
Nov
(73) |
Dec
(117) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(101) |
Feb
(208) |
Mar
(153) |
Apr
(81) |
May
(85) |
Jun
(87) |
Jul
(100) |
Aug
(145) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(123) |
Nov
(73) |
Dec
(105) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(211) |
Feb
(134) |
Mar
(299) |
Apr
(223) |
May
(292) |
Jun
(426) |
Jul
(477) |
Aug
(415) |
Sep
(501) |
Oct
(460) |
Nov
(427) |
Dec
(302) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(467) |
Feb
(423) |
Mar
(356) |
Apr
(241) |
May
(357) |
Jun
(342) |
Jul
(373) |
Aug
(421) |
Sep
(491) |
Oct
(266) |
Nov
(236) |
Dec
(310) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(228) |
Feb
(344) |
Mar
(466) |
Apr
(410) |
May
(437) |
Jun
(303) |
Jul
(255) |
Aug
(451) |
Sep
(520) |
Oct
(379) |
Nov
(430) |
Dec
(261) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(352) |
Feb
(394) |
Mar
(279) |
Apr
(534) |
May
(245) |
Jun
(392) |
Jul
(510) |
Aug
(392) |
Sep
(237) |
Oct
(332) |
Nov
(302) |
Dec
(590) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(723) |
Feb
(650) |
Mar
(530) |
Apr
(307) |
May
(300) |
Jun
(450) |
Jul
(196) |
Aug
(233) |
Sep
(270) |
Oct
(288) |
Nov
(284) |
Dec
(331) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(336) |
Feb
(277) |
Mar
(133) |
Apr
(102) |
May
(50) |
Jun
(234) |
Jul
(174) |
Aug
(274) |
Sep
(355) |
Oct
(273) |
Nov
(895) |
Dec
(749) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(744) |
Feb
(498) |
Mar
(767) |
Apr
(412) |
May
(513) |
Jun
(596) |
Jul
(372) |
Aug
(515) |
Sep
(373) |
Oct
(246) |
Nov
(210) |
Dec
(232) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(162) |
Feb
(226) |
Mar
(209) |
Apr
(162) |
May
(84) |
Jun
(153) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(142) |
Sep
(151) |
Oct
(220) |
Nov
(176) |
Dec
(131) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(61) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(93) |
Apr
(274) |
May
(83) |
Jun
(46) |
Jul
(149) |
Aug
(61) |
Sep
(49) |
Oct
(93) |
Nov
(100) |
Dec
(164) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(93) |
Feb
(130) |
Mar
(44) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(85) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(47) |
Aug
(131) |
Sep
(117) |
Oct
(115) |
Nov
(73) |
Dec
(84) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(106) |
Feb
(88) |
Mar
(116) |
Apr
(160) |
May
(121) |
Jun
(74) |
Jul
(126) |
Aug
(141) |
Sep
(101) |
Oct
(38) |
Nov
(32) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(33) |
Feb
(60) |
Mar
(112) |
Apr
(33) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(115) |
Jul
(24) |
Aug
|
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(147) |
Nov
(166) |
Dec
(118) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(53) |
Feb
(51) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(14) |
Jul
(18) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(27) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(21) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(45) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(32) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
(41) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(60) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
(26) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(67) |
Jun
(42) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(73) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(14) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(20) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
| 2022 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(25) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(27) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
|
| 2023 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(11) |
Apr
|
May
(13) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(50) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2024 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(35) |
Jun
|
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(33) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(12) |
| 2025 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(7) |
|
2
(8) |
3
(5) |
4
(5) |
5
(15) |
6
(8) |
7
(4) |
8
(5) |
|
9
(1) |
10
(5) |
11
(7) |
12
(8) |
13
(6) |
14
(7) |
15
(9) |
|
16
(3) |
17
(18) |
18
(15) |
19
(23) |
20
(20) |
21
(8) |
22
(5) |
|
23
(28) |
24
(17) |
25
(5) |
26
(7) |
27
(7) |
28
(2) |
29
(1) |
|
30
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From: mike d. <md...@je...> - 2002-06-30 20:10:27
|
begin Bill Siggelkow quotation: > I was trying to create a JPreferences folder under the plugins folder > in the jEdit CVS repository but it seems I do not have write access. > Is there something I need to do to enable this? Or can only certain > jEdit members do this? You have write access, but SourceForge's CVS server needs a little kick each time a new developer is added. Specifically, you need to SSH in to the CVS server using a normal SSH client to create your home directory. It will log you off immediately, but CVS should work after that. For the whole story, read the documentation: https://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=768&group_id=1 -md |
|
From: Bill S. <bil...@be...> - 2002-06-30 13:18:29
|
I was trying to create a JPreferences folder under the plugins folder in the jEdit CVS repository but it seems I do not have write access. Is there something I need to do to enable this? Or can only certain jEdit members do this? Sorry for such a newbie question but this is my first foray in the exciting land of open source development :-) Bill Siggelkow 770.457.8854 bil...@be... |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-06-30 02:10:03
|
Bugs item #575557, was opened at 2002-06-29 19:10 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=575557&group_id=588 Category: editor core Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: command line options do not work on NT Initial Comment: The command line options like -background do not seem to work on my setup. NT4 SP6 Jedit 4. When I follow the directions and pass the windows lancher -background for example Jedit does not run in "background mode" (or in ram, but runs normally. In addition it will open a new file called background. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=575557&group_id=588 |
|
From: Ray R. R. I. <ru...@ze...> - 2002-06-30 00:28:14
|
It is a very sexy Look and Feel. So far I've been switching between Kunststoff and Metouia, can't decide which I enjoy the most. I'd definitely use Alloy had it been free. There seems to be only two licenses, Single Developer and Company License. Single Developer seems to lend itself to projects like the Look and Feel plugin, but 200 bucks? Wouldn't know if its worth it. Its ashame money isn't growing on trees in this economy like it was in 1999, someone would probably purchase it. Perhaps some of us could shoot off an email asking them to create maybe a 3rd license type for Open Source developers. My question is this though, how are they restricting redistribution of it, Java is an easy language to take apart and reuse components, what's stopping someone from getting a product that has the Alloy L&F in it, unjaring it and the license file it requires, and repackaging it? On Saturday 29 June 2002 06:37 pm, Mark Derricutt wrote: > Hi guys, just came accross this L&F, very nice looking, pity it's > commercial :( Would look nice in JEdit. > > http://www.incors.com/lookandfeel/index.php3 > > -- \m/ -- > "...if I seem super human I have been misunderstood." (c) Dream Theater > ma...@ta... - ICQ: 1934853 JID: ta...@my... > |
|
From: Mark D. <ma...@ta...> - 2002-06-29 22:37:35
|
Hi guys, just came accross this L&F, very nice looking, pity it's commercial :( Would look nice in JEdit. http://www.incors.com/lookandfeel/index.php3 -- \m/ -- "...if I seem super human I have been misunderstood." (c) Dream Theater ma...@ta... - ICQ: 1934853 JID: ta...@my... |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-06-28 01:49:32
|
Bugs item #574838, was opened at 2002-06-27 15:10 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=574838&group_id=588 Category: plugins Group: normal bug Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Derek Groothuis (dgroo) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Error List doesn't clear w/mult. views Initial Comment: Another multiple view issue - this one's actually been around for a while but I kept forgetting to report it. When compiling (at least in Java), and using the Error List, if you have multiple views and are compiling , it sometimes starts to get confused and keeps old errors. Essentially, errors from older compilations hang around, and the only way to clear them is to exit jEdit and restart it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-06-27 18:49 Message: Logged In: NO It might be nice to have a Clear All Error command, that could be triggered on demand. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=574838&group_id=588 |
|
From: Bentley, T. <TIM...@ca...> - 2002-06-28 01:32:36
|
Danny - Good to hear from the plug-in's author :-) > On my machine everything runs nice. Indeed there are > some limitations that bother me: If I had a dollar for every time a programmer has said to me 'it runs fine on my machine'.... ;-) Nobody else has been able to get it to work, as far as I know. I got a bit further than most by looking at the source code, and I _think_ some of the transformations were working at the parsed-tree level, but the write-back wasn't. I started delving further by re-compiling Recoder in debug mode and tracing some of the execution. However, part-way through it occurred to me that it might be quicker to start from the other end, which led me to look closely at Recoder, and then at Transmogrify and JRefactory, and..... to cut a long story short I've embarked on writing a plug-in to wrap JRefactory. It won't be exactly the same kind of thing as your plug-in, as JRefactory provides a specific set of transformations and features rather than an engine for producing your own transforms. I'm happy to help with testing, etc. if you want to get your Refactor plug-in working usefully and fix up the interface, etc. To start with, as far as I can tell I've set everything up correctly. I've tried different output directories - including the same as the input directory - nothing seems to work. If you can point out where I'm going wrong, I'd be very happy :-) It might be better to continue the discussion off-list, and report back to the list on any overall progress, rather than clog it up - feel free to email me directly! Regards, Tim Bentley |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-06-27 22:10:53
|
Bugs item #574838, was opened at 2002-06-27 22:10 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=574838&group_id=588 Category: plugins Group: normal bug Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Derek Groothuis (dgroo) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Error List doesn't clear w/mult. views Initial Comment: Another multiple view issue - this one's actually been around for a while but I kept forgetting to report it. When compiling (at least in Java), and using the Error List, if you have multiple views and are compiling , it sometimes starts to get confused and keeps old errors. Essentially, errors from older compilations hang around, and the only way to clear them is to exit jEdit and restart it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=574838&group_id=588 |
|
From: Todd P. <to...@da...> - 2002-06-27 19:55:26
|
> My understanding of the problem is that when changing the > docking state a new instance of IRCWindow is created instead > of getting back the previous one.This wasn't the case with > the old docking API. > > So my question is what must I do to fix this behaviour. > Currently the IRC design doesn't allow multiple instance > running together (in fact there lots of static stuff). I > intended to fix this later (if I > can) but I wonder if my current problem is due to some > limitation (bug ?) of the jEdit docking API, or due to my > misunderstanding of this API (and I must admit my poor java > knowledge). Why don't you just make whatever object you are using to do the IRC connection a Singleton. Then, whenever a new window is created the same connection can be re-used. This should be fairly simple to achieve if you have a clear separation between the UI and the back end stuff. Todd |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-06-27 16:25:11
|
Bugs item #574655, was opened at 2002-06-27 16:25 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=574655&group_id=588 Category: plugins Group: minor bug Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Derek Groothuis (dgroo) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: jDiff won't split window... Initial Comment: jDiff blows up when it tries to split the window. However, you can manually split the window and then it will diff fine. I assume this is an API update issue with jDiff. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=574655&group_id=588 |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-06-27 14:48:15
|
Bugs item #574611, was opened at 2002-06-27 07:48 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=574611&group_id=588 Category: editor core Group: severe bug Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: jEdit 4.1pre2 - "startup" method missing Initial Comment: I've been using a bsh script in the "startup" directory to define a method used by several macros. In 4.1pre2, macros get a "command not found" error when accessing the script's method. According to the activity log, that startup bsh script is executed, but somehow the method is not accessible to macros. This has worked fine in past jEdit versions. Running under Windows 2000, Java 1.4.0_01. (BTW, I couldn't get jEdit to work at all under Java 1.4.1 beta on Win 2000.) Bob Alexander bal...@rs... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=574611&group_id=588 |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-06-27 13:07:25
|
Bugs item #571333, was opened at 2002-06-19 23:21 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=571333&group_id=588 Category: text area and syntax packages Group: severe bug Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: tilde, acute not working Initial Comment: I'm working on Linux/X11, with dead keys enabled, using jdk1.4, german keyboard. It's not possible to enter tilde (~) and acute (^) characters in jedit. This would be accomplished by pressing AltGr +, then Space for the tilde, and ^, then space for the acute. It is however possible to enter combined characters like ã or ô with those same combinations. It seems to me like a bug in Java 1.4, and I have found fitting bugs in the java bugparade. Maybe it is possible to incorporate workarounds into JEdit in the meantime, until those things are fixed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: August Mayer (jakuai) Date: 2002-06-27 15:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=569552 Not fixed in Java 1.4.1 beta; now it's not even possible to enter any dead key chars anymore. Users are already quite angry about this JDK bug, since it has been closed again and again for several time... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Slava Pestov (spestov) Date: 2002-06-23 05:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=2280 Allegedly fixed in Java 1.4.1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=571333&group_id=588 |
|
From: Danny D. <dan...@ya...> - 2002-06-27 11:49:55
|
Hi all, I've been busy with my final thesis and then I've been out for some time. When I have returned I read about people complaining about JavaRefactor. What's wrong? On my machine everything runs nice. Indeed there are some limitations that bother me: 1. First you have to set up the input and output directory. Once you do it you don't have to bother except you want to change the settings. 2. Sources must be compilable!!!! 3. There is no such an option like synchronize: that is once you started the refactoring every change you do by typing in sources will not be seen by JavaRefactor. Just restart JEdit. 4. Extract Method works fine. Just select the text, then fill in dialog information: the name of the method were the selected text belongs (this should be avoided if somebody tells me how to get such information from JEdit), the name of the new method. Click , click!!!! 5. REcoder does not keep any information regarding white spaces. So that formatting might be different than the original one. No problem with so many beautifiers!! Glad to help and Glad to be criticized, danny dig __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com |
|
From: lio-sand <lio...@if...> - 2002-06-27 08:35:11
|
Hello,
while porting IRC plugin to the new docking API (yes I know it was
introduced with 4.0 but time is an intransigeant master) I encountered the
following problem.
If you start jEdit, then connect to irc with the IRC plugin docked all is ok
untill you want to undock it and make it floating. Then the connection is
broken, but your nick is still on the channel forbidding you to reconnect
you with the same nick. Finally if you quit jEdit, all instances are the
correctly removed (due to the plugin stop() method).
Here is the code I put into the dockable.xml file:
<DOCKABLES>
<DOCKABLE NAME="irc">
new de.iqcomputing.jedit.irc.IRCWindow();
</DOCKABLE>
</DOCKABLES>
My understanding of the problem is that when changing the docking state a
new instance of IRCWindow is created instead of getting back the previous
one.This wasn't the case with the old docking API.
So my question is what must I do to fix this behaviour.
Currently the IRC design doesn't allow multiple instance running together
(in fact there lots of static stuff). I intended to fix this later (if I
can) but I wonder if my current problem is due to some limitation (bug ?) of
the jEdit docking API, or due to my misunderstanding of this API (and I must
admit my poor java knowledge).
Nevertheless, all ideas and help will be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Lionel.
______________________________________________________________________________
ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet !
vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP...
http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif
|
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-06-26 22:13:01
|
Bugs item #574318, was opened at 2002-06-26 14:55 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=574318&group_id=588 Category: editor core Group: minor bug Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Derek Groothuis (dgroo) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Flaky Behavior with multiple views... Initial Comment: jEdit (in both 4.0/4.1) sometimes seems to exhibit flaky behavior when working in multiple views (which I usually am doing). Some examples: 1) Sometimes (and it is seemingly completely intermittent) if I have two views looking at the same file, and I edit one while the other is looking at another location, the second (non-active) view will jump to where I am editing. It's fairly annoying (especially since the whole point is usually to be looking at something higher up in the file). I've been noticing it mostly while working on a couple of Perl scripts rather than .java files, but it seems unlikely that it's related to that (unless it's somehow syntax highlighting related). 2) Some plugins seem to have difficulty figuring out which view they are looking at. Often docked plugins will both look at the same view, or if I select a file in the docked plugin in one view, it will open in the other view, that sort of thing. (I would guess this is a problem with the individual plugins, though - CodeBrowser comes to mind as an example). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2002-06-26 15:13 Message: Logged In: NO The latest CodeBrowser version (on the community site since a few days) fixes most of those problems, at least as far as CodeBrowser is concerned. Gerd ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=574318&group_id=588 |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-06-26 21:55:39
|
Bugs item #574318, was opened at 2002-06-26 21:55 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=574318&group_id=588 Category: editor core Group: minor bug Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Derek Groothuis (dgroo) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Flaky Behavior with multiple views... Initial Comment: jEdit (in both 4.0/4.1) sometimes seems to exhibit flaky behavior when working in multiple views (which I usually am doing). Some examples: 1) Sometimes (and it is seemingly completely intermittent) if I have two views looking at the same file, and I edit one while the other is looking at another location, the second (non-active) view will jump to where I am editing. It's fairly annoying (especially since the whole point is usually to be looking at something higher up in the file). I've been noticing it mostly while working on a couple of Perl scripts rather than .java files, but it seems unlikely that it's related to that (unless it's somehow syntax highlighting related). 2) Some plugins seem to have difficulty figuring out which view they are looking at. Often docked plugins will both look at the same view, or if I select a file in the docked plugin in one view, it will open in the other view, that sort of thing. (I would guess this is a problem with the individual plugins, though - CodeBrowser comes to mind as an example). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=574318&group_id=588 |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-06-26 20:23:12
|
Bugs item #574250, was opened at 2002-06-26 15:12 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=574250&group_id=588 Category: editor core Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Four Minutes to Launch JEdit in W2K Initial Comment: JEdit takes more than four minutes to launch, and more than two minutes to shut down. This was true of the 4.2 version with JRE 1.3 as well as the latest versions of JEdit and JRE as of June 26, 2002. Windows 2000 is the OS. I wonder if it is because some of the directories in the Recent Directories list do not exist any more. I was using JEdit to edit files on a remote server which no longer exists ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: James C Schneider (talljcs) Date: 2002-06-26 15:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=569188 In case you would like to contact the person who submitted this bug report, my email address is jc...@ma.... Jim Schneider ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=574250&group_id=588 |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-06-26 20:12:44
|
Bugs item #574250, was opened at 2002-06-26 13:12 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=574250&group_id=588 Category: editor core Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Four Minutes to Launch JEdit in W2K Initial Comment: JEdit takes more than four minutes to launch, and more than two minutes to shut down. This was true of the 4.2 version with JRE 1.3 as well as the latest versions of JEdit and JRE as of June 26, 2002. Windows 2000 is the OS. I wonder if it is because some of the directories in the Recent Directories list do not exist any more. I was using JEdit to edit files on a remote server which no longer exists ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=574250&group_id=588 |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-06-26 17:42:12
|
Bugs item #574189, was opened at 2002-06-26 10:42 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=574189&group_id=588 Category: text area and syntax packages Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Word wrap with Traditional Chinese Initial Comment: Pls notice that most Chinese Characters can be wrapped without spaces between them. Exceptions are puncuation marks listed below (copied from Word) These are not to be placed at the end of line: !),.:;?]}¢·‥ ‧′╴、。〉》」』】〕〞 ︰︱︳︴︶︸︺︼︾﹀﹂﹄﹏﹐﹑﹒﹔﹕﹖﹗﹚﹜﹞!),.:;?|}、 And these are not to be placed at the beginning of line: ([{£¥‵〈《「『【〔〝︵︷︹︻︽︿﹁﹃﹙﹛﹝({ All other Chinese characters can be wrapped freely ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=574189&group_id=588 |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-06-26 07:54:24
|
Bugs item #573145, was opened at 2002-06-24 16:39 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=573145&group_id=588 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kim Sönksen (kimsey) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: jEdit4.1pre2 - FileOpen Dialog does not work Initial Comment: Linux, sun jdk 1.4.0: after submitting a selection a (or more) File(s) in the File-Open Dialog via the open button nothing happens ... Filesystem-Browser and double-Click are still working. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kim Sönksen (kimsey) Date: 2002-06-26 09:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=336222 The same bug occured on a windows 2K System. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=573145&group_id=588 |
|
From: Bill S. <bil...@be...> - 2002-06-26 04:43:51
|
The JPreferences plugin can be downloaded from the following URL: http://personal.atl.bellsouth.net/~debsigg/JPreferences.jar This plug-in can be used for managing JDK 1.4 Preferences. It displays a panel with a tree on the left and the preference key-value pairs in a table on the right. I followed the guidelines in the jEdit help for constructing a plug-in. Currently the plug-in does not do any interaction with the buffer; however, it does use the VFS dialog for import/export of preferences from/to an XML file. The plug-in also includes help documentation that should be available from the jEdit help. I would appreciate any feedback on this plug-in. Bill Siggelkow 770.457.8854 bil...@be... |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-06-25 20:30:36
|
Bugs item #573804, was opened at 2002-06-25 13:30 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=573804&group_id=588 Category: text area and syntax packages Group: normal bug Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: PHP loses text highlighting when search Initial Comment: Whenever I load a PHP file that is over around 100 lines or so, if I do a search that takes me a few pages down into the code all of the syntax hightlighting is lost. This also happens if I scroll with the scrollbar at a fast rate. The only way I've found to semi get around this is to go to the top of the file and hold the page down key until I've reached the bottom of the page. Then it seems to not lose the highlighting as much. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=573804&group_id=588 |
|
From: Doug <umm...@ya...> - 2002-06-25 13:43:27
|
i'd personally rather have them separate. i might use one without the other. --- "Bentley, Tim" <TIM...@ca...> wrote: > Dirk - > > Thanks for the response. I'll give things a go and > see how it pans out. > I've checked out the JavaStyle code - looks good. I > was originally thinking > of a separate plugin, but I can see how a single one > wrapping both the > Pretty Printer and (some of) the other JRefactory > functions might be a more > attractive option. > > Not sure what the time frame will be (I have lots of > 'real work' to keep me > busy!) but I'll keep you informed of progress :-) > > > Regards, > > > Tim > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dirk Moebius [mailto:dmo...@gm...] > > Sent: Monday, 24 June 2002 6:32 PM > > To: jed...@li... > > Subject: Re: [ jEdit-devel ] Further refactoring > questions > > > > Hi Tim, integrating the refactoring capabilities > of JRefactory into > > JavaStyle is a good idea. I always wanted to do it > but never > > got the time. I'd love > > to see someone do it. > > > > You have my permission to extend/modify/rewrite > the JavaStyle > > plugin to > > integrate it. Just check in your changes, and I'll > have a > > look over it before you > > release a new version. > > > > Dirk. > > > > -- > > GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. > > http://www.gmx.net > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Sponsored by: > > ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ > > -- > > ----------------------------------------------- > > jEdit Developers' List > > jEd...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jedit-devel > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > Sponsored by: > ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ > -- > ----------------------------------------------- > jEdit Developers' List > jEd...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jedit-devel __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-06-25 13:39:42
|
Bugs item #573632, was opened at 2002-06-25 13:39 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=573632&group_id=588 Category: search and replace Group: normal bug Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Liam Friel (lfriel) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Search dialoginvisible Initial Comment: Configuration: Laptop + docking station, NT4.0 When docked, laptop used 1600x1200 screen resolution. Run jEdit and have Search window positioned to right of screen (ie >1024 pixels from left). Shut down jEdit. Remove laptop from docking station. Boot laptop undocked. When undocked, laptop uses 1024 x 768 resolution. Start jEdit. Attempt to open Search & Replace dialog. jEdit attempts to display this dialog at previously stored position. It is invisible on laptop LCD, and there is no apparent way to make it visible again. jEdit should check that it's proposed display co- ordinates are valid for the active screen, and if not move the (dialog or whatever) to a sensible location before display. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100588&aid=573632&group_id=588 |
|
From: Bentley, T. <TIM...@ca...> - 2002-06-25 03:33:29
|
Dirk - Thanks for the response. I'll give things a go and see how it pans out. I've checked out the JavaStyle code - looks good. I was originally thinking of a separate plugin, but I can see how a single one wrapping both the Pretty Printer and (some of) the other JRefactory functions might be a more attractive option. Not sure what the time frame will be (I have lots of 'real work' to keep me busy!) but I'll keep you informed of progress :-) Regards, Tim > -----Original Message----- > From: Dirk Moebius [mailto:dmo...@gm...] > Sent: Monday, 24 June 2002 6:32 PM > To: jed...@li... > Subject: Re: [ jEdit-devel ] Further refactoring questions > > Hi Tim, integrating the refactoring capabilities of JRefactory into > JavaStyle is a good idea. I always wanted to do it but never > got the time. I'd love > to see someone do it. > > You have my permission to extend/modify/rewrite the JavaStyle > plugin to > integrate it. Just check in your changes, and I'll have a > look over it before you > release a new version. > > Dirk. > > -- > GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. > http://www.gmx.net > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > Sponsored by: > ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ > -- > ----------------------------------------------- > jEdit Developers' List > jEd...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jedit-devel > |