You will be surprised what is happening in California. Can you believe they are producing so much solar power that electricity price is negative. Yep, you read it right.
Why would I be surprised by something that demonstrates exactly what I said in my comment?
To shrink my comment to bullets:
— solar is inherently distributed so the best use is distributed
— solar can save a dollar or two of fossil fuel costs in a traditional fossil powered grid when the sun is out and shining
— but since the sun does not shine continuously–and energy demand often peaks in the evening–solar is really limited without a better storage mechanism.
Your negative electrical price is not a signal that solar is kicking ass and taking names, rather it is a signal that
A) yeah solar works but
B) solar is a failure as a grid energy source right now because we can not store the juice it cranks out
A negative price is not an indication that an investment is a winner. Rather it indicates that California/Californians have put in place a whole lot of solar capacity that will never pay off–that investors or consumers or taxpayers will take a bath on.
O/T. If you have a particular suggestion for DOGE to look into, a House email has been established. (See above). I had a suggestion, was wondering what to do with it, and that’s how I found-out that there is actually a place. In case you are curious, my suggestion involved reducing the $8 billion a year that is spent by repeatedly, automatically, changing the duty station and thus moving the military families around from place to place. In addition to the monetary aspect, “military brat” is a euphemism for child abuse, according to blog posts by spouses of the career-military dads.Replies: @Jack D, @Jonathan Mason, @Mark G.
[email protected]
Good idea. Military spending is obviously the biggest target for cuts in the federal budget, although we should not forget that another way to balance the budget is to increase taxes.
The military is actually a massive jobs program that also provides education, healthcare, and foreign vacations for the poor. I would recommend a 50% cut for the army. With the Navy and Air Force we still have enough power to obliterate every Nation on Earth.
The remaining 50% of the army should be relocated to the Mexican and Canadian borders and the leftover bases used as camps to “concentrate” illegal immigrants prior to deportation, and also as euthanasia camps for Medicare recipients who refused to leave the country.
Another area that needs to be looked at, although a lot of it is in the budget of the states, is the prison system. Expensive and far too many people in it, and no forced labor to make them pay their way. Prison meals to be reduced to beans and rice and water one time daily. All federal prisons can be relocated to the state of Greenland.
Foreign aid could be eliminated altogether and the US could reduce the size of its embassies in most places, or eliminate them all together.
Banning the import of foreign-made cars could revive the motor industry in Detroit.
Medicare expenses could be massively reduced by introducing euthanasia at 70. However those who are already over that age could be grandfathered or grandmothered in. Exemption would be given to over 65s who voluntarily leave the United States and unenroll from Medicare.
Social Security disability could be abolished in the same way.
The VA can be abolished. If former military personnel cannot take care of themselves–euthanasia.
A total ban on foreign vacations would massively reduce the number of federal officers working in passport control. A 100% tariff on airfares for people visiting the USA would get rid of most foreign tourists and reduce the need for federal traffic police and lousy breakfasts.
Cutting the number of Supreme Court judges to one would save a pretty penny. Or possibly the whole job could be done better by AI.
All National Parks should be auctioned off. Also all Native American reservations should be privatized.
All interstate highways should be tolled at 50 cents per mile. $1 per mile for foreign tourists. $2 per mile for immigrants or H1A Visa holders.
Remaining deficits in the federal budget could be covered by a one time “clean air you breathe” tax, which would be prorated according to how much you weigh. Corporations would count as 1 lb.
The first Andy Hardy picture was released in 1937. The actor who portrayed the character originally on Broadway was born in 1910, and would have been a teen from 1923-30. No doubt depression, war, and conscription applied brakes to it for a couple of decades, but the phenomenon was ere in the Jazz Age.
The whole idea of “teenager” as a separate category of human is relatively new and a product of postwar prosperity.
Blame the marketers, Steve's old business. As late as the 1980s, there were only two or three "generations", the younger, the older, and maybe grandpa's. Those in the younger knew they'd be the older in time. Now arbitrary age cohorts have labels slaped on them from the outside, and it's been all headache ever since.
Of course people who sold stuff (records and so on) LOVED the idea that there was a whole new category of consumer with leisure time and cash to buy stuff.
Someone-- if it wasn't Michael Medved or David Horowitz, it was somebody like them-- pointed out a difference between Jewish families and middle Amercan, WASPy ones like my stepfather's. Their kids would move away in a phase of early adulthood to "find themselves" or whatever, Northern California being a classic destination. (That's where my stepbrother went.)
...post WII prosperity has never ended in the US and kids still remain rebellious or “rebellious” (a lot of it is faux).
The Jews were also disturbed, but more patient, sending their offspring regular checks to keep them afloat.
See Sam Kashnerls When I Was Cool. Kashner’s parents were absolutely wonderful.
No, America has always been about people regardless of race, ethnicity, and religion coming here and forging their path. It’s who we are.
1790: Congress passes naturalization law limiting citizenship to ‘free white men.’
1882: Congress passes law completely outlawing immigration from China (which remains law until ca. 1946).
1924: Congress passes law favoring immigration from Northwest Europe (which remains law until 1965).
So for the first 177 years of our history we were emphatically not about immigration “regardless of race, ethnicity, and religion.”
And I’ll go even further: even many or most of the changes of the last 60 years that have led to our current large-scale immigration were sold to the people as lies. Example: the 1965 immigration bill wasn’t supposed to upset the ethnic balance of the country. Example: the 1986 amnesty was only supposed to apply to ca. one million people, and was supposed to secure the border. Example: the “Temporary Protected Status” program was supposed to be, well, temporary.
The United States rose to superpower status based almost entirely on the immigration of white Christians and Jews. We probably could have tolerated a fair amount of Asian immigration, as well, if the Burlingame Treaty hadn’t allowed it in unlimited amounts, which resulted in a systemic shock demanding it be ended.
Ahem. There are those of us who would hold the Jews wound up contributing more to our downfall than our rise.
'...The United States rose to superpower status based almost entirely on the immigration of white Christians and Jews. '
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iuo3J8L9b8
Not a single Russkie N1 moon rocket made it to space by Nov 23, 1972, way over two years past Apollo 11.
Hello, Uncle Joe. I know you’re not the Soviet Uncle Joe, but since you mentioned the Russkies – they did pretty well for a while, but their Communist “some decent guns, but we’re out of butter” economy was not up to the task, guess.
I disagree with your and others’ point about the big push for science & math in the schools after the Sputnik “Russian moon” scare. It’s the timeline that doesn’t make sense. We’re talking about an effort in the schools, as worthless as it likely was, starting in, what 1958 at the earliest? That’d mean those kids that were immersed in it for aa few years at least wouldn’t graduate college until the mid-60s. Older, experienced engineers through the ’60s wouldn’t have even taken part. Our space program was successfully in progress before any of these students were working in it.
Then, there were the late 1940s and the whole 1950s. I’m talking X-1 with (the recently-passed) Chuck Yeager breaking the sound barrier in ’47, then the X-15 with Scott not many years later going 6M or something! New interceptor/fighters were being put out yearly – the whole Century-series was impressive. There was a whole lotta engineering going on then too, well before the incipient space program. Where were the beat-Sputnik kids of the 1950s, and where were the H-1B kids?
You, of all people—the Jews—ought to be thankful. Your ancestors received this opportunity, and you proceed to piss on their graves with your indignation and ingratitude.
I confess, I have never understood the appeal of this ‘Ellis Island schmaltz’ school of immigration advocacy. Let us stipulate for purposes of this discussion that there are no substantial differences, regarding potential, opportunity, human capital, society etc., between immigration in the Ellis Island, postwar, and present eras. What do you imagine follows from that? If I think I, or my ancestors, were fortunate to get in and should be thankful for American generosity, does it follow that I should repay this generosity by stabbing Americans in the back lest I be accused of hypocrisy? I think that true gratitude would consist of advocating for the best interests of Americans, accusations of hypocrisy be damned. In any case, the extreme, ‘Catcher in the Rye’, despising of hypocrisy as the ultimate sin is a childish Leftist obsession. It is an outgrowth of the “To thine own self be true” self-idolatry that entrances adolescents/Leftists – but I repeat myself. The venerable Duc de La Rochefoucauld in maxim 218 had a much better take; “L’hypocrisie est un hommage que le vice rend à la vertu..” = “Hypocrisy is the homage vice pays to virtue.”
America was developed and became strong by a wide range of immigrants, whether it be from England, Germany, China, or Kenya, whether it be the “historic” wave or the “old” wave or the “new” wave.
Corvinus the Birther! Verily it is the End Times!
how BD destroys the communitarian folk music scene that had survived since the 1930s
I haven’t seen the movie, but if that is accurate, no great loss. That scene was as artificial as any other. The career of Phil Ochs made that grimly obvious.
Ya gotta love the Fermi-Einstein argument. That is not who Musk and Vivek are arguing to bring in, and that is not who is going to come.
The New Fermi Paradox: Where are they (the foreign 0.1 percentile in IQ)?
Ya gotta love the Fermi-Einstein argument. That is not who Musk and Vivek are arguing to bring in, and that is not who is going to come.
So Musk’s filter is in effect a financial filter. Bringing in an immigrant is the same analysis as a corporation uses when it decides to hire one more employee – will this person contribute more than we have to give them? If it is a net positive, we should “hire” them.
This is a much simpler analysis for a business – you just have to figure out how much salary you are paying that employee this year and how much more revenue he will bring in. Even then, you might have to do a deeper analysis – maybe you have to rent more office space so that employee has a desk so you have to add that to his salary, etc.
But for an immigrant, you have to consider many more factors, unto the 7th generation. It’s pretty common among 3rd world immigrants that dad is a pretty hard working guy. But then he has kids and the kids are negatively influenced by American culture and instead of being hard workers are juvenile delinquents. And dad maybe brings over his wife and her parents and his parents, none of whom are working. If you are Wal-Mart (or Tesla) and you hire dad, he is a net positive because you don’t have to pay for all of the others, but as a nation we do.
Then there are all the intangible factors of shifting a nation’s culture. Immigration is like putting salt in your soup. A little is good and a lot is too much.
Elon Musk is a South African refugee to the United States (along with Peter Thiel, David Sacks and David Friedberg). This is in large part because Musk’s Afrikaner and British ancestors decided that, instead of repelling the Bantu invasion that came down into SA from the north, that they’d instead employ the Bantus as cheap labor.
Today, the white South Africans who settled and built the country are just 7% of its population. They were the ones who built the country and made it habitable. They brought the irrigation and agricultural technologies to its deserts thereby supporting the creation of cities and large populations in a land which was previously only capable of providing for a sparse population of pastoralist Hottentots.
A first cut at political wisdom--or at least parsing all the media and academic dreck from America--is to ignore everything American Jews say. If they say "the sky is blue", time to get out your spectrometer. They do not have your interests, your nation's interests at heart.
I’ll note that Elon’s friends like David Sacks would never advocate an ethnicity/race/religion blind immigration policy for Israel, even though they are happy to advocate one for the United States. Maybe Elon should ask himself why all of his Jewish friends – the Jewish milieu from which he presumably absorbs so many of his opinions – supports Israel’s policy of discriminating against non-Jews in its immigration policies – a policy which is explicitly designed to maintain a ~80% Jewish supermajority. Maybe he should just ask his Jewish friends “what’s with the double standard?”
Notably, Israel, despite employing an immigration/naturalization policy which automatically excludes from consideration all non-Jews (99.8% of the world’s population) has a very vibrant tech community. ...
Maybe it's greed and myopia at it's core with an ideology (today called 'Multi-Culturalism') constructed around it?
The greed and myopia of the Western Anglo capitalist class knows, apparently, no bounds … Maybe that’s too cynical though. Is it really “greed” – or is it ideological? What is it?
America’s traditional integration was nothing like “immigration” today, but rather simply the conquest of the American landmass from primitive hunter-gatherers by NW Europeans.
The “dirty little secret” of America’s immigration is that its only real benefit was to bring in more white people to dilute the 1619 mistake, and push up the white share.
That’s pretty much it. I’d say the Germans were a slight upgrade to the Anglos in farming and mechanical ability. Most groups–like my Irish ancestors–not. Just bodies. But these distinctions were minor. The main thing was white bodies. As long as these immigrants were both capable of and happy to integrate–to absorb traditional Anglo-American norms, throw in with, marry and be un-hyphenated Americans–and be loyal to their fellow Americans, it worked ok.
Then we–mistakenly–allowed in those do not share Western norms, hold themselves apart, are integration hostile, bitch and whine about Americans and refuse to throw in and be loyal. Waving in random foreigners is just insane. A recipe for an unpleasant quibbling, querulous empire–an imperial marketplace–not a nation. Which, of course, is what the people doing it want.
is the Jack D-ish supposition that if it weren't for immigrants, the US would be a black nation.
America’s immigration is that its only real benefit was to bring in more white people to dilute the 1619 mistake, and push up the white share
Is 97/98th percentile on the LSAT unusual in your book? Smart father. Smart mother. Admission to prep academy attended by 75% of ENTIRE state’s National Merit Scholars year he graduated and the school that had the largest representation in the Stanford freshman class Obama’s year and one of the highest freshman placements throughout the Ivy League. Selected to be Harvard Law School Editor.
The only unusual sign of intelligence is he has a smart brother.
I don’t know why it is so important to some people that Obama be stupid. There are a lot of stupid ADOS blacks but Obama is not an ADOS black and he is not stupid.
Wokeness was a form of hysteria that finally went too far, like the Jacobins in the French Revolution, followed by a rejection of it. You saw more moderate liberals like Tulsi Gabbard, Glenn Greenwald, Elon Musk, RFK Jr., Alex Berenson and Joe Rogan go over to the other side. After the election, the Democrats said they needed their own Joe Rogan and Rogan pointed out they already had him and lost him.
Trump will reduce immigration and curb the worst excesses of DEI. Where he will fail is in reducing inflation and balancing the budget. The economic situation is getting worse but is not quite bad enough the voters will accept big cuts in government spending. Trump has said he will not cut Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and the Defense budget. If you add interest payments, which are not going down, that is seventy percent of the federal budget off limits to cuts.
Voters will think they can keep kicking the can down the road a while longer when it comes to making the needed reforms. The situation will continue to deteriorate until things get so bad voters will put in someone like Milei in Argentina. Milei has reduced inflation and balanced the budget in his country. It is too early, though, to see if he will have a long term success there.
You got it, Mark. It could be Ron Paul as President right now - same thing. It's too late and, this is baked into the numbers, as Peak Stupidity explained (just getting started) in Will the DOGE save our economy? . (Pretty much the same budget explanation you gave.)
Where he will fail is in reducing inflation and balancing the budget.
Does reducing immigration means lowering the White-Christian share-of-population by 0.5-points per year instead of 1.0-points per year?
Trump will reduce immigration and curb the worst excesses of DEI.
Achmed, it’s nice to see you back here commenting again. You and a couple other of the better commenters here, PhysicistDave and res, all seemed to have left around the same time.
Unfortunately, in the case of PhysicistDave he may no longer be with us. He had said he suffered a stroke right after getting the Covid vaccine. That may have been followed later by another stroke. It’s sad to think that PD may have been one of the victims of the inadequately tested and unsafe Covid vaccines.
It looks that way to you because you did not drink the Kool Aid. If you buy into the Narrative that put Zimmerman on trial to begin with, then Precious was a strong, beautiful Black woman. She was in effect the grieving widow and of course you would want to put her on to gain the sympathy of the jury. She was the last person on earth to talk with St. Trayvon. Please Precious, convey to us the thoughts of the Immaculate Child as he was being pursue by the white Devil Zimmerman.
This may sound utterly ridiculous to you but you do not live in (that) Clown World.
We keep having these trials – Bernie Goetz, Zimmerman, Chauvin, Penny over and over. Each time the Narrative gets tested – 400 years of white men oppressing and murdering Proud Black Men without any consequences. Black men who were jus’ mindin’ their business and dindu nuffin. Let us finally have Justice!
Depending on the mood of the time, sometimes the thin tissue of lies that is Narrative does not withstand any scrutiny at all and sometimes it stands strong in spite of its thinness because the public WANTS to believe at that moment. And the true Believers cling on to the bitter end. Because it’s not about the Truth, it’s about upholding the Narrative.
Zim was the first one, when there was still a chance of a reasonable outcome from a reasonable jury. Maybe Penny is the bookend to the era of insanity.
We keep having these trials – Bernie Goetz, Zimmerman, Chauvin, Penny over and over.
“A man without religion is a free man.” Such almost-charming “village atheist” naivete! If the “man without religion” is addicted to cigarettes/alcohol/weed/meth/coke/, porn/sex, pizza, TV, video games, [insert vice of one’s choice here], he’s not the “free man” he thinks he is. One can be even more enslaved by one’s ideas and opinions.
Wise rulers have always seen religion as necessary for the preservation of social order. John Adams said: “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” If Americans abandon morality because they have forsaken its basis in religion, they will need a Caudillo to drag all the woman-burners to the guillotine.
Yet more: religious faith can greatly expand one’s personal freedom as well. It’s unfortunate that there were no religious Sikhs in that subway car when that poor woman burned to death. The Sikhs say: “Do not give fear. Do not take fear.” Since they feel certain of Eternal Life, they do not fear death. That’s why they have always made the best soldiers in the Indian Army.
You most likely don’t know any truly religious people; I don’t blame you because there are so vanishingly few left. If you like to read books, you may read about some of the religious sages of the past. Confucius was freer than you will ever be. Meister Eckhart was freer than you will ever be.
Buddha said, “The raft is not the shore”, so a truly free man, who has “graduated” from his religious faith and practice, can let all the external trappings of official “Religion” drop like a worn-out rag. Master Dogen Zenji famously said, “I have returned from China with empty hands; not a trace of Buddhism remains.”
“None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.” – Goethe
LOL. The lawyer telling us that it's the health care system that sucks up $$$ and doesn't do shit.
No one really knows why Latinos live so long but they do, despite the fact that they spend like 10 cents on their health care system (which it turns out doesn’t really do shit in the US, just wastes trillions of $ – you can get some cutting edge cancer treatment that cost $1M and it increases the mean survival by 6 months.
“If we’re to chuck either the docs or the lawyers … easy call.”
I used to think this too but after the way “our” healthcare system has performed in the past few decades, especially during the COVID abomination, I am no longer so sure. Healthcare in this country has become every bit as parasitic as the legal system.
I’ll disagree with EM on this issue. We should not be importing a professional-managerial class, but training one domestically.
You should have stopped there Art.
But this
IMO, annual issuance of settler’s visas should be somewhere between 250,000 and 400,000 people .
is frankly nuts. You’ve got all sorts of reasonable immigration procedures–if we needed people.
But the most obviously thing in the world is the US does not need any more foreign people. We had something like 160 million people when I was born in the 50s, and we are now more than twice that. (Probably 340m+ after the “Biden” Administration’s open border.)
Huge swathes of America are just “gone”. Growing up in the Midwest, I thought I might find California–the dramatic geography, the weather, the science+technology, the modernity–a great place to live. Now it’s full of Mexicans and Asians and houses there–especially in “neighborhoods with good schools”–cost a packet and the government is a thinly disguised protection-racket, “want California weather/scenery … it will cost you”.
Housing in coastal metros is essentially unaffordable to ordinary American young people starting out on their own. And this has crept inland to inland metros that have anything going for them. Decent jobs are scarce. The un-and semi-skilled labor market is flooded with Hispanic immigrants. And the AI and robotics revolutions are rushing down the tracks.
Sure if we’ve got some grad student who looks like a real stud in battery technology or robotics or thorium cycle, ok, we can offer them the chance to stay, provided overall good genes/health, and a “good fit”–not white or Christian hostile, willing to integrate and fully throw in with us, be an American and nothing else. Maybe we could profitably pick up 10 or 20 thousand of such demonstrated high-quality people a year. But that’s it. There is no way–none–that Americans benefit by importing hundreds of thousands of foreigners.
But let’s give the kids an ‘effing break and stop this insane deluge. Let’s leave America for American kids.
I’ll disagree with EM on this issue. We should not be importing a professional-managerial class, but training one domestically. You want immigrants who have basic skills (they are proficient in English), obey the law, work for a living, and are willing and able to learn to navigate the social matrix in which they have placed themselves without calling in lawyers.
==
IMO, annual issuance of settler’s visas should be somewhere between 250,000 and 400,000 people . Aspirants are in a queue ordered according to the date you passed all the qualifying screens.
==
In order to get a spot in the queue, you should have to pass a cursory background check, a physical, and a proficiency test in English (written and oral). You get married, you and your wife have a common spot in the queue halfway between the date you were married and the date you entered the queue. You have children, your common spot in the queue is adjusted rearward with each child.
==
If one of the children reaches age 21 while you’re waiting, he’s assigned a spot of his own in the queue just behind the common spot and will be henceforth assessed separately.
==
You arrive at the head of the queue, an assessment of your family’s conduct and characteristics is undertaken (looking for criminal activity by any family member or for medical problems in family members not previously examined) and a delay is imposed if anything salient is discovered, knocking the lot of you back in the queue a number of places. Again, any children you have over 21 are assessed separately from the rest of the family.
==
If you’re not knocked back, everyone in the family over the age of 14 has to pass the English proficiency test if they have not done so in the last four years. You’re parked at the gate until this task is completed.
==
Single adults from problem countries are not offered spots in the queue. Married couples with children can win a spot and older and established married couples (both over 40, married at least seven years) can win a spot. If you’ve been cleaved off because you’ve reached 21, you have to get married and have children before you can enter, and your spot in the queue is adjusted rearward with your marriage and each child. About 25 countries would be classified as ‘problem countries’.
==
It’s important that the matrix of reception be properly ordered.
==
(1) Access to common provision for immigrants should be a function of their work credit – i.e. the number of quarters of f/t employment they’ve logged in the country or that their husband, father, or mother has logged on their behalf.
==
(2) There should be public sector positions, occupational licenses, and security clearances which are closed to immigrants; not the whole lot, but important segments.
==
(3) Bar for petty misdemeanors, aliens should be placed in preventive detention if accused of a crime; if their case is not processed or they’re acquitted or their eventual sentence is less than time served, they can be indemnified.
==
(4) Aliens are not offered parole. They serve a clipped sentence and then are deported upon release and their right of domicile is suspended for a term of years. They can return if they’ve been abroad for that term and can pass a background check, &c. The terms should be long – 60 years for a mid-grade felony, 15 to 20 years for a low-grade felony, 5 years for a high misdemeanor, 2 years for a petty misdemeanor, four months for a submisdemeanor violation.
==
(5) To be eligible for naturalization, you should have spent the majority of your natural life in the United States as a palpable resident living within the law. The median lapse of time between entry and eligibility would be in excess of twenty years.
==
(6) Recruitment and promotion in public sector positions should be regulated by examinations. Ditto private natural monopolies. Collective bargaining agreements should be debarred from allocating benefits by ascribed traits. Certain activities in workplaces which map to common crimes (e.g. extortion or harassment) should be deemed tortious. Otherwise, catch-as-catch can in the labor market.
==
(7) As a rule, the custom of producers should not be dictated by law. Exceptions: public agencies, government corporations, natural monopolies, providers of medical services, and (in certain contingencies) providers of services for travelers. Otherwise, freedom of contract and association prevail.
==
Temporary residents should be limited to accredited employees of foreign governments (and their dependents); authentic refugees (and their dependents), of which there are few; and students, teachers, and their dependents. The stock of temporary residents should be limited to about 0.5% of the total population and the extant stock should regulate the ration of educational visas distributed each year. (Schools wishing to recruit students or faculty from abroad should have to purchase visas in multiple price auctions).
==
The civic status of someone born in the U.S. should be that of his mother unless he is of legitimate birth and his father has a preferred status, in which case the father’s status is controlling. Only a citizen can beget a citizen.
You should have stopped there Art.
I’ll disagree with EM on this issue. We should not be importing a professional-managerial class, but training one domestically.
is frankly nuts. You've got all sorts of reasonable immigration procedures--if we needed people.
IMO, annual issuance of settler’s visas should be somewhere between 250,000 and 400,000 people .
No one is forcing whites to live in the most expensive big NE cities (or the suburbs thereof). Philly is 100 miles from NY but houses in (reasonably) safe suburbs are maybe 1/2 of what they are in the NY suburbs. If you go to W. Virginia, it’s yet half again and W. Virginia is all white people. Maybe they are not the best sort of white people but they are definitely white.
No one really knows why Latinos live so long but they do, despite the fact that they spend like 10 cents on their health care system (which it turns out doesn’t really do shit in the US, just wastes trillions of $ – you can get some cutting edge cancer treatment that cost $1M and it increases the mean survival by 6 months. BFD. Maybe it is hybrid (Indo-European) vigor. Maybe they have a better diet with fewer highly processed foods. Maybe they exercise more because they don’t have cars and do manual labor.
LOL. The lawyer telling us that it's the health care system that sucks up $$$ and doesn't do shit.
No one really knows why Latinos live so long but they do, despite the fact that they spend like 10 cents on their health care system (which it turns out doesn’t really do shit in the US, just wastes trillions of $ – you can get some cutting edge cancer treatment that cost $1M and it increases the mean survival by 6 months.
Very true.
But the Confucian-influenced societies of Northeast Asia somehow do not get bogged down in endless legal wrangling, as here. Law itself can’t be the whole answer.
I’m awaiting “Johnny Somali’s” day in court. It should be glorious.
which is sort of like having your only encounter with English literature be with Ernie Bushmiller and Ogden Nash.
🤣
Obama’s father had the fifth highest IQ equivalent score for his age cohort in Kenya.
What is really amazing is that despite that, he behaved like complete a stereotypical African male – sowing his seed widely and taking no interest in his children (naturally Barry idolized him and hated his white grandma who actually raised him), becoming a dissolute drunk, etc. Somehow his blackness was a more important clue to his behavior than his sky high IQ.
Barry OTOH takes after his Puritan ancestors – he’s a one woman man, moderate in his habits, etc. A weakness for tobacco is perhaps his only failing, aside from hating white people.
I'll take the other side of that bet. Weakness for the likes of people some call Big Mike... skips a generation.
Barry OTOH takes after his Puritan ancestors – he’s a one woman man...
I don’t know that he hates White people any more than any other half-Black male who prefers to live at Martha’s Vineyard and whose White mom abandoned him. He may or may not have fully appreciated all his grandparents did to make up for the assumed psychic injury his mom inflicted. White people have been some of his biggest fans his whole life and he may simply have grown accustomed to the role of helping some of them expiate their sense of guilt which is perhaps his greatest skill set.Replies: @Jack D
A weakness for tobacco is perhaps his only failing, aside from hating white people.
I think he got that from his wife. Barry would have been perfectly happy existing as a near honkey and settling down to an upper-middle class life in Chicago.Replies: @Art Deco
... aside from hating white people.
Luigi is emblematic of the Ivy League graduate of the current year. I'm not suggesting that most of them are violent; they obviously are not; they're not nearly that interesting! I am asserting that the admissions process selects for the "High-IQ Midwit." It's much like forming a basketball team with freakishly tall midgets or a philosophy department based on readers of Matthew Yglesias. They are smart yet not deep. They imagine "innovation" as a new band-aid on cancer. They will come up with new epicycles on epicycles, while not fundamentally questioning anything. They possess moral fervor only about the most bourgeois dilemmas imaginable: Inequality in the health-insurance industry is a perfect example. Competent managers of the current regime? Maybe ... maybe they're not even that anymore. They seem to be losing their justification, not to mention their faith in themselves.
Richard B. Spencer contrasts Luigi the shooter vs. Brian Thompson the CEO:
To be fair, as a violent, ideologically driven terrorist, Luigi had some potential here and there. But he ultimately sounds like a HuffPo columnist from 2009. He’s a cringe midwit and idolizing him is cringe.On the scale of dangerous, politically impactful psychopaths, he’s above Thomas Crooks (low bar) but well below Osama bin Laden, Ted Kaczynski, or Vladimir Lenin.
Sources: One, two, three.Richard B. Spencer has also analyzed the manifesto and declared it highly wanting. It is a "Midwit Manifesto," he jokes, adding that "Luigi deserves the chair on the basis of his manifesto alone." And: "Not gonna lie, boldly declaring that you are a lone wolf suggests that you are part of a conspiracy."(All quotes from Richard B. Spencer; no comment so far from former navy secretary Richard V. Spencer, but you never know.)Replies: @Jonathan Mason, @Mike Tre, @Art Deco, @Nicholas Stix, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms, @epebble
Brian Thompson: > fun to be around, if a bit of a douche
> genetic line secured through children
> did his best as a pawn in a corrupt system for which he is not responsible and which there is no political will to reform. Luigi Mangione: > grown man who listens to Taylor Swift
> “manifesto” doesn’t reach op-ed length
> can’t differentiate between correlation and causation
> a little *too* Italian…
> thinks his normie opinions are edgy or unusual
> praises Catholic Church for appealing to plebs
> aspires to read *Infinite Jest*
> constantly whines about back pain
> becomes a gym bro for the six-pack but is a terrible athlete
> believes in “AGI”
> rich parents got rich by owning a chain of rest homes, not doing something cool
> class suck-up who became valedictorian though extra-credit points
> shoots a defenseless man in the back
> gets arrested at a McDonalds
> becomes violent over a middle-class ideal of universal health insurance
Talking of manifestos, the girl who killed two yesterday in Madison, WI has also left a manifesto. It, while being filled with outbursts of a troubled child from a broken family, has a strong resonance that it represents what may be happening in a lot of troubled and broken families. This may be a fentanyl crisis bursting out from the barrel of a gun.
Birth Information:
Samantha Rupnow was born on November 7, 2009.
She had just turned age-15 some weeks earlier, but had a "boyfriend." Just not a boyfriend in the way you might think:
Gender Clarification:
She was born female and was not transgender, a point her boyfriend emphasized.
The manifesto shows she was radicalized to believe in the Evil White-Male Eternal Enemy idea. A branch of the Wokeness tree. Quote, from the meat of the manifesto:
The shooter’s boyfriend, who had known her for two years through a long-distance relationship, provided the following details:They met on social media and had never met in person.
(What is a "moid"? What is a "foid"?)The pernicious doctrines of radical-feminism grabbed the poor girl, in a satanic-seeming embrace. An easy victim, given that she was already mentally unstable, deeply unhappy, and had experienced what is called "suicidal ideation." There have always been people like this, sadly. The blame, when one of them does something that cannot be undone, can often be divvied up to many parties' failures. Seldom in the past did any of these girls murder people like this, though. I interpret the manifesto to mean she was a believer in the doctrines of Holy Wokeness that she'd known her entire life (the stranger-by-the-year 2010s and these rather-shabby early-2020s of ours). Teen girls are almost necessarily often-emotional, fragile, at risk in certain ways, but also tend to be True Believers. She really did believe in Wokeness' anti-male doctrines and perhaps would not have murdered two people had she never been exposed to those ideas.(The male teacher she may have tried to kill being absent that day, it is said she ended up killing a White-female substitute teacher in addition to a White child.)Replies: @Mr. Anon
women are the only hope for this wretched world. But even women have been brainwashed by moids for too long theyve internalized the patriarchy and turned on each other, always begging for for male approval and validation. Its disgusting. I realize the truth men are iredeemable. radfem hitler was is fucking vindicated now. They cant be reformed or redeemed. Theyre a f**king scourge upon the earth. The only solution is to total exterminate them and every foid who worships these f**king parasites. Every single male must be wiped out, from babies to the elderly. Only then can women be free to create a new world. ill be a pioneer, ill be the first to take the first step.
At the climax of the recent US campaign, when the prestige media were accusing Trump of incipient senility to deflect from their obvious complicity in hiding Biden’s obvious senescence, Trump off-handedly did three hours of unscripted live broadcast with Joe Rogan. Biden’s supposedly spritely and joyful ‘brat’ successor, Kamala, turned down a similar invite unless it could be limited to 30 minutes of scripted talking points … at her own premises.
Besides Putin’s annual live four hour public Q&A, I was impressed earlier this year at his spontaneous opening 40-minute disquisition on Russian history in his interview with Tucker. By contrast, on the same day, my pResident held an emergency press conference to deny that he was a senile retard (which of course left him looking like even more of a senile retard). This was because the Special Prosecutor looking into one of his minor crimes deemed the pResident too much of a senile retard to prosecute even though he was obviously guilty.
Sometimes the contrasts are too striking to ignore, no matter how much they gaslight.
Another Great Moment in Political PR history (to me) was when I was visiting Britain as youngster. I was aware they had a divisive Prime Minister named Margaret Thatcher, but I had no other information or opinion about her (pre-Internet and all that). I was at a shop where they had BBC Radio on. Apparently, the UK PM periodically goes on Radio and anyone in the UK can call in to speak to the PM and the PM responds on air live. Well of course the BBC management all hated Thatcher, so they screened the calls for the most hostile and vicious—but also clever and articulate—callers to pass on to Maggie. I had naively supposed the British were polite, so I was shocked when caller after caller ruthlessly harangued the PM in intemperate and often personal terms live on air. But I had underestimated the Iron Lady. One by one, she calmly and convincingly eviscerated each attack, leaving the substance a heap of ruins and the attacker impotently seething.
I was stunned. The worst attacks the country could muster against a totally unscripted and unassisted PM, and yet she defeated every one of them in single combat. It was like she played verbal King of the Hill against fifty million people and won. Without breaking a sweat.
“The Prime Minister of Britain is truly a Great Woman,” I thought.
Which I’m sure was the opposite outcome the BBC intended.
I think a lot of countries have versions of this -- although the USA certainly doesn't. Hugo Chavez of Venezuela hosted his own tv-show weekly, while president, and not some just-for-show fluff thing but 5 to 8 hours of programming straight-through, every Sunday for the thirteen years of his presidency (1999-2012). People would call in and he would banter with them and do his usual routine.See: "Aló Presidente."Hugo Chavez was popular among poor, multiracial Venezuelans for some of the same reasons Trump became popular among whatever to call the stable Trump Base. Chavez propped up his popularity using some of the same methods Trump has used.Replies: @Almost Missouri
Apparently, the UK PM periodically goes on Radio and anyone in the UK can call in to speak to the PM and the PM responds on air live
Britain isn’t a basket case.
Fundamentally, skiing is a very artificial activity for some one who doesn’t live in a mountainous or alpine area
It works in Singapore, Belgium etc.
Malaysia, less well. Lebanon, not at all.
Maybe so but it is probably one of the best higher education system in the world, so every other country is in an even worse position.
The higher education system is becoming a major problem for this country and is in desperate need of reform.
“But perhaps the US high education system should be made to mimic that of Germany”
I think Germany funnels more people into technical training or apprentice programs. It would probably be an improvement on what we do, which is sending off half of graduating high school seniors to four year colleges. That has led to a surplus of college graduates and a watering down of the college curriculum since many students can’t handle a traditional college education. It has also led to leftist indoctrination of large numbers of young people.
I went to night school while working and got a two year degree in accounting. That was enough to get a low level accounting job and a middle class income. I also ended up with no debt. So many young people now have a heavy debt burden they can’t pay off because their degree did not lead to a decent paying job. The school I went to had a three hundred page catalog with dozens of two year degree programs that would probably lead to something better at less cost.
Replies: @Ministry Of Tongues, @George Taylor
How is it that race realists and racialist are become partisans of the Equal Protection Clause? Colleges and universities should be allowed to admit whoever they want for whatever reason they want. That is so obvious as to be self-evident.
If I was Alan Garber I would establish and declare, with all the pugnacity I could summon, that who gets into Harvard is nothing but a matter of my predilection.
Why does anyone around here care about the Ivy League maintaining every inch of elitism anyway? Rather ridiculous when you think about it if you ask me.
See Almost Missouri’s answer. “Elitism” is one of those vague magic words that places the Ivy League above the law.
Not to be naive. All societies require a mechanism to select their ruling classes, who will then apply the law. We had one once, and it worked sort of OK, but it’s been hacked. See the other article about civil rights law.
Having attachment to three Scandinavian women, two of which inherited my DNA, I can attest to the idea that anti-white white women is basically a WASP/Five Eyes phenomenon: Oceania, Canada, UK, USA.
Against your weighty sample size of 3, we have the country of Sweden which has managed to transform itself into the rape capital of Europe in a period of a few years through sheer demented ‘altruism’.
BEFORE her popularity soared on social media denying that hate crimes play an insignificant role in our society.
Oy, that double negative gets you every time. Sad!
Kind of a sad effort, really. Obviously Gillibrand thought this would get some political traction – otherwise why do it – but what it shows is that the Dems are so bereft of concrete ideas to counter the changes coming next month the best they could do was a for-show stunt that has so little foundation in actionable reality that it hasn’t occurred to any ERA supporter over the last 40 years.
Also interesting is that the ERA explicitly addressed equal treatment based on sex. In light of the current cultural moment where the left tries to extend rights on the basis of gender identity, obviously the only way this amendment would further that is if it was subsequently decided through an act of Congress or perhaps some court that declaring that gender identity = sex for purposes of the law. Which ironically would be using the ERA to empower men.
So no, woke hasn’t gone anywhere and won’t for awhile. I do see some evidence that a portion of the left is pretty sick of performative stuff like this, since it’s burned up a ton of political energy and capital over the years at the expense of more concrete economic goals.
Bannon: I’m also for big restrictions on legal immigration. Every college and engineering school is flooded with foreign students taking American jobs. American jobs should be for Americans.
President Trump and I disagree on this. He said every college and community college… pic.twitter.com/1tWLSz5W3m
— Grace Chong, MBI (@gc22gc) December 18, 2024
The awful anti-white liberal white women are not going away. They will be around for years to come. Keep an eye out for them in public life and in your private life. There is nothing they love more than to destroy a white heterosexual man’s life.
You’re going full Corvinus. Never go full Corvinus.
This writer marshals some strong arguments against your view:
The Big Shining Lie: We’re Better Off Now–No, We’re Poorer, Much Poorer
It that version before or after they edited out Beria?
Part of my point (and Bardon’s) is that some “intellectual” activities are more boring than others (either in the results or the execution thereof), especially to an observer. E.g., is top-level chess in its current evolution ‘creative’ or just a memory/endurance diagnostic to see which opponent first fails to plug in the correct established tactics? Chess is a test of human calculators. Beep boop. 🤖Replies: @Ministry Of Tongues, @epebble
It depends on your definition of “intellectual”. What is this “specialized ability” that you are speaking of if not an intellectual talent?
That’s why Magnus Carlsen gave up classical chess in favor of blitz and bullet.
Fischer saw this coming decades ago – that’s why he invented Fischer Random.
“Ukraine has every liberty to chart their own course.”
Fine, then why didn’t the West side with the “freedom fighters” from Donbass, ethnic Russians trying to break free from the Kiev illegal banderite regime, like they did with Albanians in Kosovo and Muslims in Bosnia? If you had any idea what you were talking about, you’d know that Kiev came down on hard on ethnic Russians, not only in the East but also in Odessa and Mariupol, and that when Russia intervened, there had been a civil war going on since 2014, the year the CIA and the State department coup’ed Janukovich with the help of their Ukrainian neo-nazi stooges.
“You have an active imagination.”
And you are totally detached from reality. So the second Irak war didn’t happen? Or the 2014 Euromaidan coup in Kiev? Doesn’t the Wold Bank and IMF blackmail countries into doing their bidding or else no international loans? Welcome to the real world!
“Well, I suppose the US. just carried on with Europe’s tradition of imperialism.”
In a way, yes. America turned into a puppet for the globalist Anglo-American Establishment ( vid. Carroll Quigley). A tool for global imperialism, sucking America and its ordinary citizens dry. Left unchecked, globalists ( or internationalists, like David Rockefeller Jr. prided himself to be called) will leave America as bankrupt as their prior victim, the UK. Now all that’s left of Britain is The City, that is banking, and the rest is turning fast into a sprawling ghetto prison where impoverished natives have to fight with third world hordes for scraps over the ruins of their former great country.
Replies: @J.Ross, @Buzz Mohawk
Krystal and Saagar discuss Romania cancelling their election over alleged online misinformation.
Yes. It’s “Russia, Russia, Russia” all over again.
The amount of pull, twist and manipulation “our” US has in Romania is beyond what you know.
My late father-in-law taught me some things. A retired army colonel there, he was involved in the nuts and bolts of how that country ran, both under Ceaușescu and after. When he was still alive, he cried to me whenever “my” America forced something on “his” government.
Basically, countries like Romania are entirely controlled by “our” empire. The sad thing is, they went from being controlled by the Soviet Union to being controlled by the neocon US/West. Fact. He witnessed it, and I watched it with him.
What bothers me now is that that country, and some people I know and love there, are being placed on the front lines in an American proxy war against Russia.
BTW, our real estate sale there finally happened today, and the money was transferred to us. I can’t tell you how much work we had to do to get this shit to happen. Whatever, it is a timely, precautionary exit of assets from a very questionable place at this time.
Then again, the public also picked the person who told them that Mexico would pay for their big shiny border wall. As for me, I'm not that gullible, and I prefer, at this point, more of a wait-and-see attitude. You, on the other hand, as always, like to cherry-pick what suits your argument and conspicuously ignore the rest and then claim you somehow got it right. Don't pretend you're fooling anyone who isn't the same kind of idiot. As for COVID, the most relevant (though certainly not the only) thing your pock-marked memory centers can't seem to retain is that you talked tough about COVID, and then wound up in the hospital suffering from it because you didn't have the sense to take basic safety precautions. I.e., like many other tough-talking trustin'-my-immune-system COVIDiot, you crumbled like a cowardly little girl and wound up in the ER (mainly because you were too much of a cowardly little girl when it came to needles). So if you think Bhattacharya or anyone else is on your side of the COVID debate -- except perhaps for the guy who was a heroin addict for 15 years and claims a worm ate a portion of his brain -- then think again. Maybe you too need to check if a parasite ate your brain away. If it hasn't, then what could possibly convince you that you have any standing to dictate to anyone about how to deal with COVID, or Ukraine, or anything else at this point? It was noontime GMT when you wrote that comment. Isn't there a government job you're supposed to be pretending you're doing instead of taking time out to dispense lunacy on internet forums? The government jot the rest of us are paying for? Next time, spend a little more effort on that, instead of trying to twist history to suit your stupid Facebook health memes.Replies: @Mark G.
I will give one tip away that the president has mentioned, he will say to that murderous former KGB colonel, that thug who runs the Russian federation, you will negotiate now or the aid we have given to Ukraine thus far will look like peanuts.
Vaccines normally are tested five to ten years before being approved. It was not particularly irrational to avoid getting an inadequately tested vaccine using a novel technology never tried before with unknown potential long term negative effects.
For those who did not want to risk the vaccine, some doctors attempted to develop and implement early home treatments using expired patent drugs like HCQ or Ivermectin, nutritional supplements, and cheap patented steroid drugs that could be used if someone got sick. These home treatments never became widely available because the government threatened doctors trying to use them with the loss of their licenses. This was done to maximize profits for big pharma by leaving mass vaccinations and three thousand Remdesivir as the only way to deal with the disease.
I was let out of the hospital after a few days after a doctor said I did not look particularly sick. A couple weeks later my personal doctor said he was surprised my x-rays showed no lung damage, unusual for someone who had been hospitalized. It is quite likely I could have gotten well quickly with an early home treatment. No such treatment was ever made available.
I believe I have pointed out all this to you multiple times with it always going in one ear and out the other without it ever sinking into that little parrot brain of yours. Following your stupid and thuggish behavior during the epidemic of supporting yanking the licenses of doctors trying to provide an alternative to the vaccines and blaming the victims who became sick because they could not avail themselves of the treatments they wanted, you then went on to support an idiotic war pitting the Ukraine against a much bigger country it could not beat. Now that the Ukrainians are losing, I am laughing at you. You are a really funny guy, HA.
See? The guy the country picked claims to have made that approval happen in record time, and now you want to complain about it? Take the L and shut up.And Ivermectin (as worthless as it proved to be) was never made illegal. People came here claiming how you could buy it in large quantities. And they said you could get HCQ, too, which unlike Ivermectin, is not just mostly worthless, but can actually mess with your heart, which is why even the nurses and doctors who were at one point hoarding it (or so it was claimed) eventually stopped pretending it was worth anything. Did you get either of them? No, of course not. That would require some self-motivation, and initiative and spine. Instead, you're trying to blame your failure for taking charge of your own health -- like you claim we should be allowed to do -- and saying it's the government's job to do all that for you. Or some other convoluted and hypocritical mish-mash that I would expect only from someone so dumb that he pretends to be a prophet of the dangers of government waste WHILE AT THE SAME TIME GOOFING OFF ON A GOVERNMENT JOB. Again, you think anyone who isn't a loon like you will somehow ignore this? Amazing.Replies: @Mark G.
Trump: “‘The Pandemic no longer controls our lives. The Vaccines that saved us from COVID are now being used to help beat Cancer – Turning setback into comeback!’ YOU’RE WELCOME, JOE, NINE MONTH APPROVAL TIME VS. 12 YEARS THAT IT WOULD HAVE TAKEN YOU!”
Jackassery. I'd hope folks here are capable of something called "thought".
It’s not capitalism when law requires its purchase and there is no practical way to reconcile grievances with a provider. In that sense, I would say the insurance companies represent a form of anarchy more so than Thompson’s killer. In this case Mangione is more of a vigilante.
Medical “insurance” isn’t pure “insurance” at all. Insurance is supposed to protect you from unknown large catastrophic risk – your car is totaled in a collision. Your car insurance doesn’t pay if you need new windshield wipers.
The reason it exists in the US in the 1st place goes back to the wage freeze of WWII. Massive war spending would have unleashed a Biden like inflationary surge so the government froze wages and prices instead. Employers were not allowed to lure workers by offering them pay raises. But fringe benefits were not capped so large employers starting offering things like health insurance on top of the frozen wages. In those days, there was not much that medicine could do for you and health insurance was a minor cost anyway.
Health insurance has a “catastrophic” element to it, but most of the money that flows thru the system (with a lot of friction as the health ins. cos skim a lot of the $ on the way) is for routine care for which you should be paying out of pocket. Your annual health checkup is not an unknown large catastrophic risk, it is an expected expense like new tires for your car.
“Obamacare” should have encouraged the issuance of true catastrophic health insurance that would cover you if, heaven forbid, you were stricken by some costly illness but instead it did the opposite and mandated coverage of every conceivable condition, ensuring that the premiums would be very high. Imagine how much your car insurance would cost if it included coverage for all repairs and maintenance and car owners had no incentive to skimp because any costs would be covered by insurance?
The people in Europe who began calling themselves "Antifa," a label eventually exported the USA by the 2010s, are today's nominal anarchists.How often do we see "Antifa" committing acts in line with the old vision of Propaganda der Tat ("propaganda of the deed")? The anarchists of the late-19th and early-2oth century were ready and willing to use anti-state terrorism. The best analogue in our time and in our frame-of-reference would be Islamist terrorism. But Postmodern Antifa in Europe and the USA are, usually, nothing like this. As has been pointed out many times, these groups more usually are shock-troops of the Establishment. Sometimes they can become violent and a general nuisance. But they are always more interested in doing kind of role-playing games.The Stone Toss comic-artist, soon after he emerged in 2017-18, has gotten a lot of mileage out of the contradictions and watered-down absurdities of today's anarchists and anarchism-adjacent leftists, a fertile field for satire: https://stonetoss.com/comic/opposites-attract/https://stonetoss.com/comic/counter-revolutionary/https://stonetoss.com/comic/perestroika/https://stonetoss.com/comic/broken-window-fiduciary/https://stonetoss.com/comic/branded/https://stonetoss.com/comic/suck-the-system/https://stonetoss.com/comic/pruning/https://stonetoss.com/comic/working-clash/https://stonetoss.com/comic/the-shirking-class/https://stonetoss.com/comic/projection/https://stonetoss.com/comic/tax-the-kitsch/https://stonetoss.com/comic/turbulence/https://stonetoss.com/comic/reporting-for-duty/https://stonetoss.com/comic/peace-of-junk/Replies: @Mike Tre, @Curle
Those who would have been staunch Anarchists in the past today, after offering up a screed against The Man, whip out their cell phones and start floating
” The people in Europe who began calling themselves “Antifa,” a label eventually exported the USA by the 2010s, are today’s nominal anarchists.
How often do we see “Antifa” committing acts in line with the old vision of Propaganda der Tat (“propaganda of the deed”)? The anarchists of the late-19th and early-2oth century were ready and willing to use anti-state terrorism.”
Today’s antifa are not anarchists. They are enforcers of current state tyranny. There is nothing “anti-state” about their terrorism.
The original antifa of National Socialist Germany were promoters of communism/Bolshevism. They were typical communist revolutionaries, seeking to install a different form of government, not eliminate government.
It is futile to attempt a discussion with you.
And yet so many commenters still do. I don’t know why. Corvirus’ whole purpose here is to “nuh uh” and annoy. Steve once called him/her/it an “ankle biter”, which seemed accurate enough. Stop feeding him and maybe he’ll go away.
Essentially all of our insane race/DEI stuff that is happening today is a product of the failure of the central premise of the civil rights era: if we eliminated de jure discrimination and gave blacks preferences across a broad spectrum for awhile then they would naturally catch up to whites.
Obviously this didn’t happen despite tens of trillions in wealth transfers, explicitly pro-black discrimination, overhyping of black achievements and contributions, and turning a blind eye as their culture deteriorated into an appalling mess that everyone secretly is revolted by.
Much of the social policy pursued by the left (and some by the right) are based on the idea that man and society can be perfected through the application of enlightened political choices and programming. Additionally, the modern left looks at the upliftment of blacks as the single most important social endeavor of American history. The former cannot accomplish the latter and it’s driven them to increasingly bizarre and totalitarian efforts in pursuit of the impossible. As I mentioned, I think there is a minor but not insignificant share of the left that is beginning to realize this and most are hoping there is some kind of softer version of civil rights-oriented policy they could still push to satisfy their consciences and have a marginally positive effect.
Along with this, I think the more perceptive political strategists on the left recognize it’s now a political loser that will not claw back the working class defections to the GOP that have grown for three straight presidential elections. This is a difficult situation for them because they are dependent on 90+ support from blacks to win national elections and this group is accustomed to being catered to, but the rest of the country increasingly doesn’t care about.
That some elites actually believed such a ridiculous idea was brought home in Justice O'Connor's opinion in, IIRC, Grutter v. Bollinger, from the early 2000s, where she opined that in 25 years or so, racial preferences would no longer be necessary. LOL.Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Jim Don Bob
"Essentially all of our insane race/DEI stuff that is happening today is a product of the failure of the central premise of the civil rights era: if we eliminated de jure discrimination and gave blacks preferences across a broad spectrum for awhile then they would naturally catch up to whites."
Yeah, rebadging literal al Qaeda jihadis as diversity-friendly "moderate terrorists" has to be the most amusing aspect of this.https://twitter.com/kunley_drukpa/status/1865414098021675103https://twitter.com/uxhaterr/status/1865610984829636732"John Rawls Islamism" FTW!Replies: @Ministry Of Tongues
is now officially governed literally by the people who, according to the official story, attacked us on IX/XI.
That photo and reading list are embarrassingly phony. Who believes this stuff?
I only wish the guy was photographed while reading Noticing.
and even a Chinese community.
And then there is history:
One of the many contemptible aspects of the Garland/Biden Department of Justice has been the normalization of punishing whistleblowers. I don’t know if this apples to Agent Shapley; I am most familiar with the case of Eithan Haim, a surgical resident who worked at Texas Children’s Hospital. Haim became aware that TCH continued to perform transgender interventions on minors once it became illegal in Texas. And that TCH’s leadership was lying when they announced that they had desisted from these practices.
In leaking the information to Chris Rufo, it appears that Haim was scrupulous about maintaining patient confidentiality and following HIPAA. That was irrelevant to the DOJ, who has been engaging in a jihad to ruin the gender heretic’s life in every way they can.
From this past summer, the US Attorney’s press release. And a defense of Haim at the National Review.
Haim continues to discuss his experiences on Twitter, which unsurprisingly now include motions to gag him. Public awareness of DOJ/FBI lawfare could diminish trust in these institutions.
And how come we haven't heard about the trial of the "Hang Mike Pence" guys and whoever it was who built the gallows? Do you know who built the gallows? Have you heard their names? Why have they seemingly been allowed to fade into obscurity while Grandmas who took an unauthorized day-trip inside the Capitol are being thrown in jail?I'm not making excuses for anybody on J6. They rioted. Maybe they figured, after months on end of rioting and civil disorder the previous summer: Hey! White people can riot too.But I don't invest the Capitol with this mystical significance that all those "Our Democracy" stooges on MSNBC do. It's silly. So is your outrage.Replies: @deep anonymous, @Moshe Def
And you’re wrong. “Hang Mike Pence” signs, the gallows, the constant violent rhetoric which was obviously not merely symbolic given the brutal attacks on the police and guards they carried out, etc.
>They rioted.
It was much more of an IRL shitpost. Especially, in comparison to months of the “mostly peaceful protests”. Why do you even acquiesce and validate the use of that term?
Biden should have pardoned the January 6 protestors as a ‘gesture of reconciliation.” They’ve actually been rotting in jail.
They should have taken advantage of the educational opportunities available in jail to improve themselves. They would also be able to get a free psychiatric examination.
Thanks. I try, and I continue to discover musical artists that I did not know about. We all have our tastes.
One of my philosophy professors in college liked to say, with regard to relativism, “Everything is a matter of taste, but some tastes are better than others.”
He had worked as a carpenter building apartments in San Francisco before he earned his Ph.D. in philosophy.
On Christmas Day this year, my godson will give a performance on the organ in the same church in Transylvania where I became his godfather at his christening that I attended 14 years ago. We have pictures of me holding him there in the church in his little, white, christening outfit.
He cried when the priest put the water on him.
The organ he will play is so old that the bellows were powered mechanically by men in the days before electricity.
He is gifted, like my wife. He loves music and music theory. We have had detailed conversations about this. He speaks English fluently, which he learned entirely on his own, via the internet, by communicating with other young people around the world. He is 14 years old, and his parents are always amazed when he converses with me, very adroitly, in my native language.
He will play the organ in that old church in his hometown in Transylvania on Christmas Day.
Tears are welling up in my eyes now…
Did it have a red cover?
Why, pray tell, would you doubt it? The number of Ashkenazi Jews with no American ancestors from the pre emancipation period dwarfs those who have such ancestry by an order of magnitude.
“Eh, my earliest ancestor in the USA is a paternal great grandfather who arrived in 1890, well after the end of slavery.”
I doubt it.
As is often the case with you, it's difficult to tell if your evasiveness is bad faith or confusion. In case you've forgotten, the matter at bar is your claim that my "virtue signalling" and "air of superiority" are evidence of my descent from slavers, Whether my ancestors were deemed undesirables and/or invaders is entirely irrelevant.
But even if this was true, you and your ancestors were deemed invaders and undesirables.
I'm not sure I grasp your point here. Are you trying to say that Jews have more moral shortcomings than honest folk such as yourself? Thus, having experienced these from the inside, so to speak, they know more about them? Something else? In any case this too is entirely irrelevant to the matter at hand, i.e. your claim that my moral shortcomings ("air of superiority" as well as "virtue signalling) are a tell tale sign of my descent from slave dealers. As some fellow named 'Corvinus' said in the next thread regarding Steve's review of Wicked https://www.unz.com/isteve/my-review-of-wicked/#comment-6885306 "Ad hominem is not a replacement for a cogent segment."Replies: @Curle
Well, you’re Jewish. I admit you know far more about moral shortcomings than I do.
Why, pray tell, would you doubt it?
You’re lucky he didn’t respond “citation required.” And if you respond that your grandmother told you he’d again insist on a citation.
You can’t criticize the left if you also do what you’re criticizing the left for.
The Jan 6 rioters can rot in jail and be thankful they weren’t mowed down en masse. And yes yes yes yes yes yes yes I say the same thing about antifa and BLM too, but the Jan 6ers are WORSE, because antifa and BLM never humiliated our nation before the entire world by rioting at our CAPITOL, never tried to take Congress hostage, kill the Vice President, and overturn an election by thuggery.
Re-posted from Peak Stupidity:
https://peakstupidity.com/index.php?post=3143
——–
The rise, fall, and re-rise of “pardons” and relation thereof to the de-Westernization of U.S. political life
The closest analogy to the 11-year blanket ‘pardon’ for “all crimes, known and unknown, charged and uncharged” would be the medieval system under which the emperor could declare, arbitrarily, whether a given person would be ensured life and liberty or deprived of life or liberty.
See the concept of the “imperial ban.” It was a form of what we now know as the U.S. system’s presidential pardon, except in the reverse: the governor’s or president’s pardon cancels a convicted man’s conviction. The “imperial ban” cancels an otherwise-“unconvicted” man’s natural right to life and liberty (in later-standard thinking; see wording of the Declaration of Independence). Placed under the “imperial ban,” a man was a public enemy who was to be killed.
This kind of arbitrary authority exercised by the established powers of Europe undermined their legitimacy. It was great fuel to all the endless swirl of movements back to the Reformation or even to the Renaissance. I’ve noticed non-Europeans are okay with arbitrary authority, but Westerners never are. We demand things make sense.
You’ll find lots of people praising the Chinese and others here towards the mid-21st century, but the Chinese permit their awful government exercising a cruel form of repression and running a system that would be stomach-churningly distasteful to any Western stomach. Corrupt-bargain “pardons” (and non-prosecutions) and illegitimate convictions: people are okay with them, though some might find it in them to complain here and there. The two-thousand-some political prisoners now crammed into a special built prison in Hong Kong (following the hostile crackdown by the PRC after the 2019 anti-China protests), a typical PRC-Chinese isn’t outraged; we, Westerners, are outraged on their behalf more than their nominal fellow-countrymen are.
Pardons are a harkening back to a system that is best left behind in medieval times, or with PRC-China and its satellites or imitators (if any). The tacit recognition of this was that the “pardon” power was so seldom used for so long, except for cases here and there for kind of symbolic purposes.
Who was the first president to start to really strain the “pardon” power? I think it may have been Bill Clinton with his series of pardons for campaign donors late in his second term. There is even a Wiki page “Bill Clinton pardon controversy.” The biggest of all was the oligarch Marc David Reich (1934-2013), alias “Marc Rich,” a man tied extensively to Israel who fled U.S. justice for many crimes. He was pardoned in full by Clinton on the morning of January 20, 2001, along with other lesser characters of similar type, nepotistic favors done for donors and the like.
By the time the first orange-haired president blumpfed his way onto the scene, the major controversy in 2001 over Bill Clinton’s pardon of the Israel billionaire “Marc Rich” ca. 15 years earlier, would’ve seemed child’s play. In other words, at some point in the 2000s or 2010s a line was crossed by which this kind of pardon was conceivable and no longer would elicit the kind of shock that Bill Clinton’s wave of corrupt D-insider pardons elicited in 2001. Trump had little compunction about nepotistic pardons: there were many Trump “Marc Rich’s” in 2017-2021. Biden’s pardon of his ne’er-do-well crack-addict son is a blatant case but not one of an abrupt break in precedent.
A de-Westernizing system with the power of “pardons” in place may be a dangerous thing. Yes, it is only part of the story alongside selective prosecution and other things including legalized-systematized anti-white and anti-male laws and preferences (“this employer gives special consideration to all women, people of color, certified LGBTQ community members including pre-op Transgender individuals”). But the “pardon” power if used in this way, including as used by Trump, can undermine the legitimacy of institutions in a way we, Western people, traditionally would have treated as taboo.
A system with lots of corrupt pardons or corrupt prosecutions ends up looking like so many backward Mid-East type countries, or the more backward of the ex-communist-bloc countries. That is clearly the way things have gone: the USA a wealthy society but no longer a firmly-rooted Western-normed society.
Totally disagree. Pardons are part of the checks and balances system. They rpovide an opportunity for the Executive to cancel the actions of the Judiciary or Legislature. Along with the ban on statutory law that targets individuals, they are part of the Constitution's attempt to prevent the political machine from trampling over individuals.
Pardons are a harkening back to a system that is best left behind in medieval times, o
He doesn’t need political cover to end the abuse of the J6 protesters. He should just do it and in announcing it provide a meticulous inventory of just how okupiers and Antifa had been handled in blue jurisdictions over the ten years previous. Give us the names of the judges and prosecutors.
Trump certainly doesn't "need" political cover to pardon those dummies who protested on January 6 and who are currently languishing unfairly in jail. Nevertheless, political cover is still useful for Trump in this case. In fact, according to the Guardian, Trump has already used Hunter Biden's pardon as political cover for his stated plans to pardon some, but not all, of the January 6 protesters.Coincidentally, Biden is using Trump's disgusting pardon of Trump's father-in-law Charles Kushner as political cover for Biden pardoning his son Hunter. And Kushner's pardon provides plenty of political cover, since, according to Wikipedia, Kushner "was convicted of illegal campaign contributions, tax evasion, and witness tampering after hiring a prostitute to seduce his brother-in-law, arranging to record a sexual encounter between the two, and sending the tape to his sister." What guy.If it wasn't so sick, it would be funny that guys like Charles Kushner and Hunter Biden are integral parts of America's first families.Replies: @kaganovitch
"He doesn’t need political cover to end the abuse of the J6 protesters."
It’s perfectly in keeping with everything else that’s happened during this scumbag’s tenure in the White House. Most administrations are characterized by a total indifference to the will of the people — that goes without saying — but Biden’s presidency has been distinguished by its calculated antagonism. Literally every move he’s made during the past four years was designed to piss off the public, and this is a final, sneering “fuck you” to the American people from the most egregiously awful president in our history.
It all makes sense because he was never elected, merely installed with fake votes while everybody but the J6ers just sat and took it.
this is a final, sneering “fuck you” to the American people from the most egregiously awful president in our history.
How short your memory is. Biden can't be that when there's still LBJ, FDR, and Lincoln, to name a few.
...a final, sneering “fuck you” to the American people from the most egregiously awful president in our history.
Speaking of “the family’s corruption”, could it be that one of the reasons why customers pay usurious interest rates on credit cards may be found in the person of Joe Biden? Ever since he was elected senator from Delaware in 1972, he has been living off the largesse showered upon him and his family by the credit card companies/banks who run his home state.
i’m lovin’ it ®. Biden just robbed the MSM/Democrats of auto-generated 'outrage' content if/when Trump pardons everyone on our side. Also, sanctimonious appeals to “rule of law” are now even more hilarious than ever.Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
What Do You Think of Biden's Pardon for Hunter?
Fun “rule of law” compilation 🙂 :
SUPERCUT!
Corporate media: Obviously Biden would never pardon Hunter pic.twitter.com/gJRhASCAUs
— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) December 2, 2024
Everything about these pompous twits is barfable -- their body language, their unctuous voices, their drag-queen make-up, their clumsy acting, their shameless lying, everything!Oh yeah, they're also war criminals.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1863537344038740264
Corvy loves to point out shortcomings in others (mostly imaginary ones) but we never learn about Corvy himself.
What Corvy has been hiding is that his family is literally synonymous with racism. He is from the Crow family – the JIM Crow family to be specific.
This is Attorney Bradley Edwards.
He represented 70 trafficking victims of Jeffrey Epstein starting in 2009 & was instrumental in bringing him down.
He dedicated a decade of his life to the Epstein trafficking case.
This is what he said when asked about Trump's involvement… pic.twitter.com/asAUx1dFgO
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) January 2, 2024
Scientific American Ignored Years of Editor Laura Helmuth’s Appalling Conduct, Then Scalped Her After I Circulated Her Own Tweets
Support for Helmuth’s hatred and bigotry further exposes science writers’ political bias, meager reporting skills, and distaste for the American public.
Paul D. Thacker
Nov 18, 2024
Replies: @Art Deco
"An Unscientific American" discusses the resignation of Laura Helmuth from her position as editor-in-chief at Scientific American. The author, Michael Shermer, argues that her departure exemplifies the risks of blending facts with ideology in scientific communication.
Helmuth faced backlash after posting controversial remarks on social media regarding political views, which led to public criticism and her eventual resignation. Shermer reflects on how the magazine's editorial direction has shifted towards progressive ideology, suggesting this has compromised its scientific integrity. He notes that had Helmuth made disparaging comments about liberal viewpoints, her outcome would likely have been more severe.
The article critiques Scientific American for endorsing positions on gender and race that Shermer sees as ideologically driven rather than based on scientific evidence. He expresses concern that such ideological capture within scientific publications can distort facts and undermine credibility.
Scientific American was a respectable and challenging publication in 1985. During the succeeding 12 years, it was turned into something more akin to New Scientist or Omni. I recall an article by a retired physicist lamenting this published about 25 years ago. He said when he began his career he’d been told that if he discovered something truly important, (1) submit it to Physical Review Letters or a like rapid publication journal in order to claim priority, (2) submit a detailed paper to the apposite section of Physical Review, and (3) submit it to Scientific American so that a scientifically literate non-specialist audience can read it. It was not an academic journal, but it was adjacent to that. I haven’t looked at it in nearly 20 years; I’m assuming it has gotten worse, like everything else.
The Conversation was not a melodrama.
Some people now say this country will not break up because of how powerful the federal government has become. That centralization of power, though, makes it more likely for the country to eventually break up.
This is a very good point.
Very you. A belt and suspenders guy, only with no pants.Replies: @Corvinus, @Mike Tre, @Ministry Of Tongues
It bears worth repeating
A belt and suspenders guy, only with no pants.
I’m stealing that.
In a major city near me the Gay chorus or some such homosexual singing group is making this year’s subject matter a tribute to Dolly Parton. I think they are claiming she’s a gay icon now, whatever that means. She’s been married since the ‘60s to a man and conservative Christians claim her as well (which makes more sense). This is a girl who gained popularity singing country songs about the heartsickness girls feel when boys treated them badly. And when I checked out a Shakespeare book at the library years ago the fey fellow at the counter asked me if I realized Shakespeare was gay. This stuff’s getting old.Replies: @Ministry Of Tongues
Then the hostile takeover by homosexuals started,
the fey fellow at the counter asked me if I realized Shakespeare was gay. This stuff’s getting old.
It was Auden who started that rumor. In reality, Shakespeare is everyone and everything.
Even though Wicked has been a money machine for 21 years, I didn’t recognize any of the melodies. Back in Broadway’s 1950s golden age, hit musicals’ catchiest numbers were quickly hustled onto the radio, so that by the time a typical audience member got around to seeing the show a year into its run, he’d been hearing songs from it for months; hence, he was inclined to leave the theater humming some of the better-known tunes. But the last song I can recall making it past rock radio’s anti-Broadway barrier was Stephen Sondheim’s “Send In the Clowns” a half century ago. So now it’s quite feasible for somebody like me who doesn’t go out of my way to sample new show tunes to be utterly oblivious to the Wicked soundtrack even after two decades.
Whilst living in what Taki likes to call The Big Bagel, the only notice I took of the Tony Awards (TM) was once a year when big posters appeared in the subway stations flogging the nominees. I recall that I never heard of the “big” “blockbuster” nominees, nor ever heard any music from them.
It seems day to day (night to night?) Broadway is some kind of niche hobby, which occasionally births a Wicked or Cats or whatever that then has to run for decades to keep the rest of NY theater afloat.
Back in the day, you used to get exposed to such stuff on the Ed Sullivan Show and other venues, and big tunes would be on the radio. “If I Were a Rich Man,” “They Call the Wind Maria,” etc. Even in college perfectly normal guys would play the Cabaret soundtrack before or after the Doobie Brothers or Pink Floyd.
As a side note, I also noted that the nominees all seemed to open around the same time, right before the awards, as if some Commission had looked them over in tryouts, decided who the winners would be, and so the whole things was, well, “staged.”
Might it not be the subject matter of the plays and the fact that many became movies? After all, an Italian guy getting the hots for a Puerto Rican girl who looks like Natalie Wood makes a lot more sense as entertainment than does a witch or a bunch of cats. Same goes for the other soundtracks my parents had on vinyl: Man of La Mancha, South Pacific, King and I, etc.Replies: @Jack D
Even in college perfectly normal guys would play the Cabaret soundtrack
If you can’t beat the Houthis, you can’t beat Russia. What more is there to discuss?
“With two large oceans on each side of us and by far the largest military on the planet, there is little threat of a foreign invasion.”
And yet, in spite of all that, there it is , right here — the largest foreign invasion in all human history, happening right now, to this very country: conceived, sponsored, funded and abetted by its own ostensible “government”; and we’re not supposed to resist it in any way, or even talk about it.
Whoopee. An EU thinktank and some Neocon proff don’t like Mearsheimer.
I like him better already.
I’m not impressed by your “experts”.
This is the first attempt at guilting White women into voting left next election. How many people are there who are still feeling guilty about slavery? I think that boat has sailed, but they can try. It was weird to me how hard the left went pro-abortion this time around here in NY. Every ad was some broad bragging about her abortion and how proud she was to have had it. Turned off every woman I know. Even a gal that’s had an abortion doesn’t have good feelings about it. Many feel guilt for the rest of their lives. Guilt about something they actually did, not guilt about what some filthy rich widow in Louisiana did 170 years ago.
Your governor was on TV at one point saying that voting for Trump meant you were "anti-abortion," among other things. I thought, "Everybody's anti-abortion, you fucking freak. No one on this earth is thinking 'yay abortion,' even the pro-choice people."Replies: @bomag, @kaganovitch, @Reg Cæsar
It was weird to me how hard the left went pro-abortion this time around here in NY. Every ad was some broad bragging about her abortion and how proud she was to have had it. Turned off every woman I know. Even a gal that’s had an abortion doesn’t have good feelings about it.
So, rather than any quotes from Steve suggesting "You’ve always expressed disdain at best for Pat Buchanan." and "Every time you’ve deigned to glorify Pat with the star power of your criticism it’s always been to denigrate him as a low IQ anti-semite whose love for people and nation is nothing more than a thinly veiled Nazi heart..." you've moved the goalposts to "How much of an influence can Buchanan have been on Steve", a matter that was not under discussion. At this point I'm starting to wonder if your music videos aren't fakes tooReplies: @Pat Hannagan
How much of an influence can Buchanan have been on Steve given that Sailer is still promoting the gas chamber wooden door theory of WWII?
Kaganovitch, mate.
It’s not incumbent upon me to demonstrate in a form of writ the step by step accounting of my general understanding of the last 30 years of everything Sailer ever said about Buchanan; not only in essay format but also in the deep dives of commentary sections which your fevered antennae of agitated exception has taken exception!
(note the ancient style grammar which you all so clearly yearn as the true indication of a truth speaker. One who was told of, in tales of yore, where men wrote sonnets in pencil by firelight, as their (Irish) wolfhound sat (stood) duty bound beside his master while some marsh tart banged weeping and yelping at the window on a long cold Friday night.)
I have clearly demonstrated that Sailer has hitherto expressed disdain for the subject of his all too lately reappraisal of a man who stood opposed to every aspect of everything that Sailer not only ever said, but was the epitome of all the goyish nazi thinktank intellectuals that Sailer ever drew his Rubicon; the very basis of the history that Sailer holds to HIS HEART (dramatic effect there. Pixies softly, softly, LOUDER, that spawned the grunge era).
If you’d read Sailer, like I have, for 30 years or more, every bit of Sailer from the front end to the backend to the down into the drain end (into comments is what I’m saying) then you’d know that Sailer has always opposed Buchanan, when all is done and said, on simple racial terms.
Why is this so hard for you to comprehend?
Trump is as compromised, if not more, by Epstein than any one.
==
Thanks for the fantasy. We all benefit.
Engaged in? As in the widows of the former Masters of the Plantation obtained slaves by operation of law and their names appear on the bill of sale in a direct or trust capacity even if some plantation manager handled the transaction? Even if the answer isn’t this you should assume it is something like this. Every single time the outrage machine regarding slavery in the American colonies is built upon a tortured or selective telling of the history.Replies: @Jack D
Between 1856 and 1861, white women engaged in nearly a third of the sales and purchases of enslaved people in New Orleans
Yup, that is the 1st thing I thought of. In the 19th century, women did not often engage in business but if their husbands passed away they really had no choice. Some of these women (the Widow Clicquot in France, for example) became very successful but they didn’t enter business until they were forced to do so by the untimely death of their husbands.
Note the clever trickery of phrasing – “white women engaged in nearly a third of the sales and purchases of enslaved people in New Orleans”. What % of this 1/3 was sales and what % was purchases? I’ll bet you 90% of it was widows SELLING their slaves as they liquidated their late husband’s estates. I’ll also bet you that the author knew the exact % and intentionally muddled the truth by mixing sales and purchases together.
Nah, I've seen documenteree everdence of what the widows were about.
I’ll bet you 90% of it was widows SELLING their slaves as they liquidated their late husband’s estates
That television series, Lovecraft Country, illustrates your point.
An Amos Tutuola film directed by Fellini would have been great, though.
No, it isn't. There is a world of difference between "We want stories about us" and "All stories must be about us."Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
It is that simple.
“There is a world of difference between “We want stories about us” and “All stories must be about us.””
A good point; but really, if you want to get down to it, it’s actually more like, “All of *your* stories must now be about *us*.”
I don’t know if Steve agrees with this, but it would be interesting to see him put his film-critic hat on and do an overview of the latest fad: the Jordan Peele-led “Black! horror movie” craze. My feeling is, none of these movies work as horror, or even *can* work (especially not “Get Out”), because culturally blacks have no horror tradition to build out from, and specifically no tradition of the Gothic or of the uncanny (hell, it’s *all* uncanny — see Amos Tutuole); and no interesting science fiction either, because no actual science in the first place. The subtext of all these movies is –you guess it– slabery, once again, as if that’s really something to be afraid of in this day and age, but what else they got?; and maybe those dopey black-specific superstitions, like being weirdly unusually afraid of snakes (is that even true, or do they just fake it because it’s an identity-reinforcement thing?).
Horror, like comedy, works because it warps the straight line. The problem is that blacks believe so many ridiculously stupid, patently false things, that for them, there is no straight line to begin with.
So LSD was synthesized earlier than hitherto thought?
OT — Some bits from Simplicius — the Bryansk strike was a waste of dwindling ATACMS and did no damage, which makes it just like the occasional and ineffective “deep strikes” Ukrainian bandits were already doing with drones — Russian missile strikes vastly outnumber these gestures and are rolling up irreplaceable infrastucture — winter is coming —
Though Putin had to make some escalatory show [the updated nuclear policy], it’s more realistic to expect Russia not to react in any overt way until Trump’s term settles in. Putin is aware that an outgoing senile despot who doesn’t care if the world burns behind him may seek to start WWIII, and that Zelensky may see his final two months’ chance to provoke Russia into overreacting. As such, it’s best for Russia to do nothing, and continue grinding the offensives which are destroying Ukrainian lines everywhere.
—
A couple months back, you may recall World Bank announced that as per their calculations, Russia had finally surpassed both Germany and Japan in GDP PPP. However, the official IMF and CIA figures still scoffed at this, with Russia trailing both countries on their counts. This allowed the popular narrative to be maintained that the World Bank figures were some kind of inaccurate fluke or anomaly.
Well, the IMF has just done their latest report and has officially concluded that Russia has blown past both Germany and Japan as of 2024, and is now the number four economy in the world. And not only that, but the IMF has Russia in the lead by an even larger margin than World Bank. On top of which, the CIA also updated their numbers and likewise reflects Russia at the number four position.
The neocons have failed in Iraq, they failed in Afghanistan, they ran away without a fight from the Houthis, they allowed October 7th to happen, they have utterly destroyed the Ukraine as was predicted, they have failed to steal Donbas mineral wealth, they have failed to weaken Russia, they have made Russia stronger by every measure, they have failed in Iran, they have damaged American prestige, they have not built up American war manufacturing as they promised they would, they failed to plan properly for any of these wars, and they have managed to damage our critical allies like Germany. There have never been bigger failures in the history of warfare than the neocons. For how much longer will we allow the neocons to fail?
“My proposal would also prevent African migrants from coming, unless they have demonstrable Italian ancestry.”
You don’t understand how this works. Let’s just say, for fun, that your sci-fi proposal is enacted. In that case, all African migrants simply claim Italian ancestry on arrival, they are merely coming to Italy to rejoin their families of old; they are assigned a court date and a formal procedure to investigate the validity of the claim. And then they either just never show up for the hearing and are free to roam about Italy causing mayhem forever, or else each individual investigation drags on for years, lining the pockets of unemployable “social historians” and so forth, and the Africans are still free to rape and plunder Italy as they please.
Oh, and once this grift becomes known as a can’t-lose play, the African invasion increases ninefold.
As some wag once noted, The appeals process will always continue until the immigrant wins.
My proposal would also prevent African migrants from coming, unless they have demonstrable Italian ancestry. Obviously.
Nah your comment was just taking a whiny shot at core (GermanoCelt) Americans and parroting a current leftist trope of “over tourism”. Basically to play up problems caused by “tourists”–white people–and downplay/ignore the real problems caused by immigrants–non-white people.
Of course, tourists can be annoying as hell. (I try to behave and not be an “ugly American”, but I’ve failed a time or two.) And the rising world prosperity has meant more and more “tourists” out and about with most of them going to a lot of the same places crowded the “hot spots”–the monuments, markets, museums, plazas and piazzas, cathedrals, restaurants, sidewalks, trails … (You don’t have to go to Italy or Barcelona. AnotherBrother and I were moving AnotherDaughter’s car in 2021 and drove through Yellowstone–we were not alone. Or try Yosemite on any nice summer day. LOL.)
But tourists … go back home. You can easily regulate their numbers with visas, permits, hotel taxes, admission fees, etc. etc. The reason they’re around at all is lots of people make money off of them. Tourists provide “free money” a city/region/nation doesn’t have to come up with by trading something people actually want–wheat, maize, lumber, oil, gas, steel, autos, airplanes, electronics, ships, software …
Immigrants in contrast, do not go home. The problems they bring are permanent. They leave their genes behind to keep those issues and conflicts going forever.
It is that simple.
No, it isn’t. There is a world of difference between “We want stories about us” and “All stories must be about us.”
Without having seen Gladiator II yet, I’d respond that casting Denzel is fine:
Disagree. Ok it’s not as offensive air dropping blacks into Victorian costume drama. Still stupid and annoying.
Someone who looks like Denzel–at least as he did 30 years ago–would be an oddity as gladiator, a “circus freak” for entertainment. But as someone wealthy and playing power politics in Rome–non-existent, ahistorical–and hence annoying.
And the producers seem blind to the reality that the rest of the world has not been fully pickled (yet) and does not share America’s “must have blacks!” Stockholm syndrome style brain disorder.
As a kid, I thought the West, the world was very fortunate to have America as the big winner of the War and the superpower of the post-War world. But since the coup, we’ve become just a big sewer pipe flushing garbage culture, abject stupidity (“race does not exist”, “racism!”, “diversity!”, “you go girl”, homos, trans …) and absolutely toxic minoritarian ideology out to the rest of the world.
The further a nation is from the English language and American culture, the better its chances. If
you want your nation to survive, itself, cut yourself off from the big sewer pipe spewing our ridiculous, toxic shit your way.
Are you saying do not come? Too bad, I’m gonna come.
Do not reply to my comments again. Please don’t.
Interesting how you’re supposed to accept any and all Catholic immigrants because uh… Jesus, but SWoM doesn’t have accept your discussion.
But then modern life–which actually liberates us from the daily struggle for survival–just seems to let out the inner loon in a whole bunch of folks.
Nature used to cull the loons by default. We’ve interrupted that process for better or worse.
That reminds me of an essential question I have been preocupied with lately--- what makes a Mick a Mick? This is what came out.To begin with, I don't think we could do better than start with art; and the most characterisitic art of the Irish is of course the poem. Though he won the world's greatest prize for The Lake Isle of Innisfree, and though The Second Coming is his most quoted, the best loved poem by Yeats is Easter 1916. It is imbued with many ideas and we can understand a lot about Irish people by drawing them out.The first stanza of the poem is about the Irish Patriots Yeats did not at first respect, and ends with a perfectly poetic estimate of them:
Pat Buchanan may fulminate as well as any of the Pats at iSteve. But, unlike them, he is neither inebriated nor a Mick.
-Reg Caesar
In other words, the opinion of serious people, such as W.B. Yeats, was that the Irish Patriots were not. They were maybe even just fools. Even their talk of strategy, that too amounted to no more than a preface on the way to the pub. As it was, Yeats himself was on his way to "the club," where making fun of the Patriots he had just stopped to talk to in the street was usual fare. That, too, though, is what fools do.Detraction is a sin that has seemed ingrained in the Irish. The joke is that if there are three Irishmen in a room, two of them will be in the corner talking about the other. It is hard to get yourself taken seriously if the others are always badmouthing you, and it is hard to take anyone else seriously if everyone else has something to say about them. What does it take to overcome such a culture and be a leader of men? Enter the unsung hero of Irish history, John McBride.Rather all but unsung, because Yeats does name him in his litany, after remembering him in these words:
...having thought that they and I but lived where motley is worn.
John McBride had married Maud Gonne, the star of the Abbey Theater; she was Yeats' muse, his imagination's preocupation, and his symbol of Ireland itself. She was his dream, in not just one or two ways, and he proposed marriage to her more than once, by some accounts many times. But Maud Gonne's father was a General, and John McBride had been a soldier, and had earned himself a reputation for valor in battle, fighting the English manfully at the side of the Boers. He was a war hero, and Maud Gonne married him in 1903. The marriage did not endure, because McBride was abusive. That much of the story seems sure--- and it would not have merited a memorial from a nobel laureate. But the tale of how McBride wound up at the Rising is a bit of fool's gold, we might say. We are to picture McBride haggard and probably hung over the morning of the Rising, walking down the streeet in Dublin when he happens to come upon McDonough and the rest of them, on thier way to cross the line with the English.
This other I had dreamed
a drunken, vainglorious lout;
He had done most bitter wrong
to some who are near my heart.
Yet I number him in the song.
He too has resigned his part
in this casual comedy;
He too has been changed in his turn,
transformed utterly.
The story got passed down through the survivors and it is what gave Yeats the ground to call the Rising "this casual comedy." It gets even better. Standing before the firing squad that was about to make him a martyr, McBride was asked if he would like a blindfold. He declined the offer and said instead
Where are you boyos going with those guns?
We are on our way to start our war with the British Empire.
Are you now?
We are---and might you like to come along with us?
When Yeats heard that line he quipped that McBride should more honestly have said he had been staring down pint pots all his life, hence the words of the poem "This other I had dreamed a drunken, vainglorious lout."So much for the notion that the leaders of the Rising became heroes by becoming martyrs. Yeats may well have been thinking of his own heart when he said
I have been staring down English rifles all my life.
Yet they did become heroes in the eyes of the Irish people, and Yeats memorialized his rival as worthy of honor. How did this happen? It seems to have been the fruit of reflection. Easter 1916 became the sequal to September 1913, where Yeats had delcared "romantic Ireland is dead and gone." Looking back, Yeats said that poem seemed "outdated." But it's a good thing he wrote it. To see how far you have come you must remember where you were; September 1913 had been that landmark. The occasion it marks was a trifling debate about the public display of some art. Now there was much destruction and many martyrs. In light of the Rising, September 1913's refrain reads rather like the weight of Good Friday; it is a great poem, and thank God Yeats wrote it:
Too long a sacrifice can make a stone of the heart.
The practical fact of the matter is that it takes a little while for news to spread and word to go around. Once it did, one thing was clear: the men who pulled off the Rising, these were no fools---they were leaders. When they had come to that respect, there was newfound sympathy to be had for the POWs, their circumstance now a news item to be made for talk; now it was their turn to go about the world like wind; and the martyrs themselves had earned their place in that company of storied brave. No one much remembers the hero of September 1913, however. He was John O'Leary. Michael Brendan Daughtery views the debate about the Rising as between Patrick Pearse and Edmund Burke. But it is probably more appropriate to imagine what John O'Leary would have said to Patrick Pearse. He had told Yeats, "There are things a man must not do to save a nation." We may guess that O'Leary would have told Pearse, "There are things a man must not do to manipulate his countrymen." Whose heart Pearse knew so well.The Irish heart, Patrick Pearse thought, was of such depth that it could redeem the greatest loss--- if only the heroes are brave enough. It was an insight he might have drawn from contemplating how life was about to imitate art: how much more would life imitate life that looked like art?Pearse was raised on the art of the Abbey Theatre, the heroic depictions from Ancient Ireland of Cuchulain. In that way, the poet created the warrior that realized the poet's dream. Then to complete the circle, the poet memorialized the warrior in his finest poem. And then, well then the poet seems to have forgot who he was. Before he died, Yeats was claiming to have the heart of a fanatic.
Yet they were of a different kind,
The names that stilled your childish play,
They have gone about the world like wind,
But little time had they to pray
For whom the hangman’s rope was spun,
And what, God help us, could they save?
But it was not always so. Yeats was relatively tepid about these things most his life; he was cautious when it came to violence. The point is that that changed, in some sense.Patrick Pearse though, he never changed. "We hate the English!" He said that because his countrymen largely did not, not deeply. There was enough freedom to make peace worth keeping. As things turned out, what Pearse did was a success; he succeeded in shifting the paradigm by declaring a Republic the way he did. But again, we see what he did there. And we should keep the moral compass that points to the truth and can state it plain: that he should not have done that. Not that way. He probably went to hell for it.To think of John McBride instead of Patrick Pearse as the true symbol of Ireland, that might be useful. (It is certainly different than thinking of Maud Gonne as the symbol of Ireland.) For McBride ended his life on a sober note and became all that barroom talk. Being a fool and getting drunk, detraction and alcholism--- these are things that lead to violence. But you might say that they are things that can be overcome by a fighting spirit.Do not get it wrong right here though---that Irish fighting spirit belongs to poets. They might be warriors but the point is that they are not actors; they know their lines because they are thier lines, and they deliver them on time. "I have been staring down English rifles all my life." Another line of McBride's, bequethed in what little time he had left, was the one piece of advice that Michael Collins really needed to hear: "Don't get stuck in buildings again." The Big Fellow's strategy became about deploying assassins. Yes, it is useful in many ways to think of John McBride as the personification of Ireland. But his biographer has not showed up yet. That seems odd, his story is one made for the movies. One story though that did get made into a movie in a sense was the one that snuck into the documentary called One Million Dubliners, about Glasnevin cemetery. The poem inspired by it is called Michael Collins' Heart:
Out of Ireland have we come
Great hatred, little room,
maimed us at the start.
I carry from my mother's womb
a fanatic heart
At the college at Douay, they rendered the voice of the psalmist, from the sixty third psalm, in this way:
There is a road
that leads the garden full:
And there is a lily of the valley.
Clear is the water
that flows from the Boyne:
And my Heart is fairer than any.
Others did it a different way. The one we have states the beauty of God's design, instead of the depth of the enemy's machination. That way, we may say, right here, suffices and more.Replies: @Nicholas Stix, @Gapeseed, @kaganovitch, @Ministry Of Tongues
Man shall come to a deep heart: and God shall be exalted.
she was Yeats’ muse, his imagination’s preocupation, and his symbol of Ireland itself. She was his dream, in not just one or two ways, and he proposed marriage to her more than once, by some accounts many times.
On the other hand, Pound seduced Iseult in a couple of weeks.
Britain has very strong libel laws, and we have the 1st Amendment.
Excellent quick summary Art.
I’d rank ’em 3,4,2,1–Kamala, Biden record, mail ballots, fraud policing.
What’s regrettable is how high the floor is for Democratic candidates. As recently as 15 years ago, the floor was around 40% of the electorate. Now it is north of 45%.
Exactly. The drum I’ve been beating.
We just had an administration that openly ran a “y’all come on up” open border–an open attack upon the American people and “our posterity’s” future, flat out treason. I’m super happy Trump won, because if the voters did not rebuke that there would basically be no hope left beyond depressing civil war type scenarios.
But c’mon. Kamala–vapid and cackling and simply installed–was a terrible candidate and she won … 48% of the vote!
(It’s down to 50.2-48.1 now and there are–by my back of the envelope–a couple million ballots left in California and another 1.5m scattered around between NY, IL, NJ, WA, OR. Kamala will probably win another 2m and Trump 1.5 and the final will tick down to something like 50-48.3)
A “replacement player” normal seeming (heterosexual, married with children) white male Democrat would probably be worth the 1% swing necessary to beat Trump. It took an appalling candidate to lose to him. And that appalling candidate got 48% after the administration’s open border treason. Think about that.
"Moving away from men might be a needed defence mechanism for women. It is powerful in the message that it sends: that women don’t have a duty to show compassion to men who deny them basic respect. P.S. - I've got a book out, please buy it."‘No man will touch me until I have my rights back’
I tend to assume this movement will collapse due to the age-old problem of fraternising with the enemy.As illustrated in this fantasy piece, also from the Graun:https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2024/nov/08/trad-wife-happy-marriage-friends-advice-column
McKenna, who is 24 and lives in a rural, conservative state, recently got back on dating apps after a year of finding herself. She had two first dates planned for this weekend, but after Donald Trump won the election, she cancelled both.“It’s heartbreaking to know that in this country you only matter if you’re a straight white man,” she said. “It’s just devastating that we’re at this point. So I will not let another man touch me until I have my rights back.”
“I met my husband when I was 25. I dropped out of university, got involved with drugs and drinking too much, and my self-esteem was at rock bottom.One night I ended up at a party with people I didn’t know and someone slipped something in my drink and I lost all memory until the next morning when I woke up on the sofa in a strange man’s apartment. He had rescued me and taken me to his place. I didn’t leave his flat for three months, except to be taken out to dinner and sent off to a gym to get back in shape.We got married a few months later and are still very happily married 15 years later. In terms of looks, he is a 10. In terms of intelligence, a 10, in terms of being a nice guy, an 11.He has a job that pays well and we have a really nice lifestyle. I haven’t worked since I met him and I like that. He cooks, cleans and books our holidays. He even sends me off somewhere warm in January because I get depressed in the winter.I get teased constantly by my friends for being a totally kept woman.”As someone said elsewhere - "the catch is that it was this guy who drugged her".Replies: @Curle, @Jack D, @Reg Cæsar
Doesn’t this fall in the category of “cutting off your nose to spite your face?”
I suspect these vows (to the extent that these women were having sex in the 1st place, which is not very much) will have around the same shelf life as New Year’s Resolutions – say 2 or 3 weeks and they will be forgotten.
However, some Leftist women are shaving their heads (another example of “cutting off your nose to spite your face”) and it’s gonna take them more than a couple of weeks for their hair to grow back.
I suspect that on a statistical basis the # of women who are actually doing this is nothing. There are just a handful of loudmouths that get flagged by the media. It’s like how 5 “famous” Puerto Rican musicians who were Kamala supporters to begin with came out and denounced Trump because a comedian at his rally told a joke about Puerto Rico and this was supposed to swing the election but in reality Trump won in heavily Puerto Rican districts in Florida. What you see in the media has about as much resemblance to reality as pro wrestling does. You have to understand it all as a type of entertainment.
OT — Anonymous claimed:
[Bitcoin wannabe Ethereum] is almost past 3500.
Why is this political?
Because once ETH surpasses 3,500, 1.5 billion dollars worth of Jane Street shorts positions will begin liquidation. Zerohedge has been documenting the Jane Street funds manipulation of ETH prices for over a year straight, if their short position gets liquidated the entire hedge fund will go under sending ETH to the moon (due to forced covering) while simultaneously sinking the rest of the stock market ( they are heavily over-leveraged and will be forced to sell stock to cover) this is a legitimate happening the likes of Sam Bankmanfried and the failure of FTXmeep meep https://t.co/qC1czO2RKq
— zerohedge (@zerohedge) November 11, 2024