[go: up one dir, main page]

The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Alastair Crooke Ambrose Kane Anatoly Karlin Andrew Anglin Andrew Joyce Audacious Epigone C.J. Hopkins E. Michael Jones Eric Margolis Eric Striker Fred Reed Gilad Atzmon Gregory Hood Guillaume Durocher Hua Bin Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir ISteve Community James Kirkpatrick James Thompson Jared Taylor John Derbyshire Jonathan Cook Jung-Freud Karlin Community Kevin Barrett Kevin MacDonald Larry Romanoff Laurent Guyénot Linh Dinh Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Patrick Lawrence Paul Craig Roberts Paul Kersey Pepe Escobar Peter Frost Philip Giraldi Razib Khan Ron Unz Steve Sailer The Saker Tobias Langdon A. Graham A. J. Smuskiewicz A Southerner Academic Research Group UK Staff Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Agha Hussain Ahmad Al Khaled Ahmet Öncü Al X Griz Alain De Benoist Alan Macleod Albemarle Man Alex Graham Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alexander Jacob Alexander Wolfheze Alfred De Zayas Alfred McCoy Alison Weir Allan Wall Allegra Harpootlian Amalric De Droevig Amr Abozeid Amy Goodman Anand Gopal Anastasia Katz Andre Damon Andre Vltchek Andreas Canetti Andrei Martyanov Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andrew Hamilton Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Napolitano Andrew S. Fischer Andy Kroll Angie Saxon Ann Jones Anna Tolstoyevskaya Anne Wilson Smith Anonymous Anonymous American Anonymous Attorney Anonymous Occidental Anthony Boehm Anthony Bryan Anthony DiMaggio Tony Hall Antiwar Staff Antonius Aquinas Antony C. Black Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor AudaciousEpigone Augustin Goland Austen Layard Ava Muhammad Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Bailey Schwab Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Kissin Barry Lando Barton Cockey Beau Albrecht Belle Chesler Ben Fountain Ben Freeman Ben Sullivan Benjamin Villaroel Bernard M. Smith Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Blake Archer Williams Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Book Boyd D. Cathey Brad Griffin Bradley Moore Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brett Wilkins Brian Dew Brian McGlinchey Brian R. Wright Britannicus Brittany Smith Brooke C.D. Corax C.J. Miller Caitlin Johnstone Cara Marianna Carl Boggs Carl Horowitz Carolyn Yeager Cat McGuire Catherine Crump César Keller César Tort Chalmers Johnson Chanda Chisala Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlie O'Neill Charlottesville Survivor Chase Madar ChatGPT Chauke Stephan Filho Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Chris Woltermann Christian Appy Christophe Dolbeau Christopher DeGroot Christopher Donovan Christopher Harvin Christopher Ketcham Chuck Spinney Civus Non Nequissimus CODOH Editors Coleen Rowley Colin Liddell Cooper Sterling Courtney Alabama Craig Murray Cynthia Chung D.F. Mulder Dahr Jamail Dakota Witness Dan E. Phillips Dan Roodt Dan Sanchez Daniel Barge Daniel McAdams Daniel Moscardi Daniel Vinyard Danny Sjursen Dave Chambers Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Boyajian David Bromwich David Chibo David Chu David Gordon David Haggith David Irving David L. McNaron David Lorimer David M. Zsutty David Martin David North David Skrbina David Stockman David Vine David Walsh David William Pear David Yorkshire Dean Baker Declan Hayes Dennis Dale Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Diego Ramos Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Dmitriy Kalyagin Don Wassall Donald Thoresen Alan Sabrosky Dr. Ejaz Akram Dr. Ridgely Abdul Mu’min Muhammad Dries Van Langenhove E. Frederick Stevens E. Geist Eamonn Fingleton Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Edward Curtin Edward Dutton Egbert Dijkstra Egor Kholmogorov Ehud Shapiro Ekaterina Blinova Elias Akleh Ellen Brown Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Emil Kirkegaard Emilio García Gómez Emma Goldman Enzo Porter Eric Draitser Eric Paulson Eric Peters Eric Rasmusen Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Gant Eugene Girin Eugene Kusmiak Eve Mykytyn F. Douglas Stephenson F. Roger Devlin Fadi Abu Shammalah Fantine Gardinier Federale Fenster Fergus Hodgson Finian Cunningham The First Millennium Revisionist Fordham T. Smith Former Agent Forum Francis Goumain Frank Key Frank Tipler Franklin Lamb Franklin Stahl Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner G.M. Davis Gabriel Black Ganainm Gary Corseri Gary Heavin Gary North Gary Younge Gavin Newsom Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Galloway George Koo George Mackenzie George Szamuely Georgia Hayduke Georgianne Nienaber Gerhard Grasruck Gilbert Cavanaugh Gilbert Doctorow Giles Corey Glen K. Allen Glenn Greenwald A. Beaujean Agnostic Alex B. Amnestic Arcane Asher Bb Bbartlog Ben G Birch Barlow Canton ChairmanK Chrisg Coffee Mug Darth Quixote David David B David Boxenhorn DavidB Diana Dkane DMI Dobeln Duende Dylan Ericlien Fly Gcochran Godless Grady Herrick Jake & Kara Jason Collins Jason Malloy Jason s Jeet Jemima Joel John Emerson John Quiggin JP Kele Kjmtchl Mark Martin Matoko Kusanagi Matt Matt McIntosh Michael Vassar Miko Ml Ole P-ter Piccolino Rosko Schizmatic Scorpius Suman TangoMan The Theresa Thorfinn Thrasymachus Wintz Godfree Roberts Gonzalo Lira Graham Seibert Grant M. Dahl Greg Garros Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Greg Klein Gregg Stanley Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Conte Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Gunnar Alfredsson Gustavo Arellano H.G. Reza Hank Johnson Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Hans Vogel Harri Honkanen Heiner Rindermann Helen Buyniski Henry Cockburn Hewitt E. Moore Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Howe Abbot-Hiss Hubert Collins Hugh Kennedy Hugh McInnish Hugh Moriarty Hugh Perry Hugo Dionísio Hunter DeRensis Hunter Wallace Huntley Haverstock Ian Fantom Ian Proud Ichabod Thornton Igor Shafarevich Ira Chernus Irmin Vinson Ivan Kesić J. Alfred Powell J.B. Clark J.D. Gore J. Ricardo Martins Jacek Szela Jack Antonio Jack Dalton Jack Kerwick Jack Krak Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen Jake Bowyer James Bovard James Carroll James Carson Harrington James Chang James Dunphy James Durso James Edwards James Fulford James Gillespie James Hanna James J. O'Meara James K. Galbraith James Karlsson James Lawrence James Petras James W. Smith Jane Lazarre Jane Weir Janice Kortkamp Janko Vukic Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Cannon Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jayant Bhandari JayMan Jean Bricmont Jean Marois Jean Ranc Jef Costello Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey D. Sachs Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jeremy Kuzmarov Jesse Mossman JHR Writers Jim Daniel Jim Fetzer Jim Goad Jim Kavanagh Jim Mamer Jim Smith JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Atwill Joe Dackman Joe Lauria Joel Davis Joel S. Hirschhorn Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Gorman John Harrison Sims John Helmer John Hill John Huss John J. Mearsheimer John Jackson John Kiriakou John Macdonald John Morgan John Patterson John Leonard John Pilger John Q. Publius John Rand John Reid John Ryan John Scales Avery John Siman John Stauber John T. Kelly John Taylor John Titus John Tremain John V. Walsh John Wear John Williams Jon Else Jon Entine Jonas E. Alexis Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Revusky Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Sawyer Jonathan Schell Jordan Henderson Jordan Steiner Jorge Besada Jose Alberto Nino Joseph Correro Joseph Kay Joseph Kishore Joseph Sobran Josephus Tiberius Josh Neal Joshua Scheer Jeshurun Tsarfat Juan Cole Judith Coburn Julian Bradford Julian Macfarlane K.J. Noh Kacey Gunther Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Karl Haemers Karl Nemmersdorf Karl Thorburn Kees Van Der Pijl Keith Woods Kelley Vlahos Kenn Gividen Kenneth A. Carlson Kenneth Vinther Kerry Bolton Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin DeAnna Kevin Folta Kevin Michael Grace Kevin Rothrock Kevin Sullivan Kevin Zeese Kit Klarenberg Kshama Sawant Lance Welton Larry C. Johnson Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Lawrence Erickson Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Leonard C. Goodman Leonard R. Jaffee Liam Cosgrove Lidia Misnik Lilith Powell Linda Preston Lipton Matthews Liv Heide Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett Louis Farrakhan Lydia Brimelow M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maciej Pieczyński Mahmoud Khalil Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marc Sills Marco De Wit Marcus Alethia Marcus Apostate Marcus Cicero Marcus Devonshire Marcus Schultze Marcy Winograd Margaret Flowers Margot Metroland Marian Evans Mark Allen Mark Bratchikov-Pogrebisskiy Mark Crispin Miller Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Gullick Mark H. Gaffney Mark Lu Mark O'Brien Mark Perry Mark Weber Marshall Yeats Martin Jay Martin K. O'Toole Martin Lichtmesz Martin Webster Martin Witkerk Mary Phagan-Kean Matt Cockerill Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Battaglioli Matthew Caldwell Matthew Ehret Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max Jones Max North Max Parry Max West Maya Schenwar Merlin Miller Metallicman Michael A. Roberts Michael Averko Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Hoffman Michael Masterson Michael Quinn Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Michael Walker Michelle Ellner Michelle Malkin Miko Peled Mnar Muhawesh Moon Landing Skeptic Morgan Jones Morris V. De Camp Mr. Anti-Humbug Muhammed Abu Murray Polner N. Joseph Potts Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Nathan Cofnas Nathan Doyle Ned Stark Neil Kumar Nelson Rosit Neville Hodgkinson Niall McCrae Nicholas R. Jeelvy Nicholas Stix Nick Griffin Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Nicolás Palacios Navarro Nils Van Der Vegte Noam Chomsky NOI Research Group Nomi Prins Norman Finkelstein Norman Solomon OldMicrobiologist Oliver Boyd-Barrett Oliver Williams Oscar Grau P.J. Collins Pádraic O'Bannon Patrice Greanville Patrick Armstrong Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Patrick Martin Patrick McDermott Patrick Whittle Paul Bennett Paul Cochrane Paul De Rooij Paul Edwards Paul Engler Paul Gottfried Paul Larudee Paul Mitchell Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Paul Souvestre Paul Tripp Pedro De Alvarado Peter Baggins Ph.D. Peter Bradley Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Haenseler Peter Lee Peter Van Buren Philip Kraske Philip Weiss Pierre M. Sprey Pierre Simon Povl H. Riis-Knudsen Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Qasem Soleimani R, Weiler Rachel Marsden Raches Radhika Desai Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ralph Raico Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Ramzy Baroud Randy Shields Raul Diego Ray McGovern Raymond Wolters Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Reginald De Chantillon Rémi Tremblay Rev. Matthew Littlefield Ricardo Duchesne Richard Cook Richard Falk Richard Faussette Richard Foley Richard Galustian Richard Houck Richard Hugus Richard Knight Richard Krushnic Richard McCulloch Richard Parker Richard Silverstein Richard Solomon Rick Shenkman Rick Sterling Rita Rozhkova Rob Crease Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Debrus Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Fisk Robert Hampton Robert Henderson Robert Inlakesh Robert LaFlamme Robert Lindsay Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Stark Robert Stevens Robert Trivers Robert Wallace Robert Weissberg Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Rolo Slavskiy Romana Rubeo Romanized Visigoth Ron Paul Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Rose Pinochet RT Staff Ruuben Kaalep Ryan Andrews Ryan Dawson Sabri Öncü Salim Mansur Sam Dickson Sam Francis Sam Husseini Samuel Sequeira Sayed Hasan Scot Olmstead Scott Howard Scott Locklin Scott Ritter Seaghan Breathnach Servando Gonzalez Sharmine Narwani Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Sidney James Sietze Bosman Sigurd Kristensen Sinclair Jenkins Southfront Editor Spencer Davenport Spencer J. Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen F. Cohen Stephen J. Rossi Stephen J. Sniegoski Stephen Paul Foster Sterling Anderson Steve Fraser Steve Keen Steve Penfield Steven Farron Steven Starr Steven Yates Subhankar Banerjee Susan Southard Sybil Fares Sydney Schanberg Talia Mullin Tanya Golash-Boza Taxi Taylor McClain Taylor Young Ted O'Keefe Ted Rall The Crew The Zman Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas A. Fudge Thomas Anderson Thomas Hales Thomas Dalton Thomas Ertl Thomas Frank Thomas Hales Thomas Jackson Thomas O. Meehan Thomas Steuben Thomas Zaja Thorsten J. Pattberg Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Timothy Vorgenss Timur Fomenko Tingba Muhammad Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Engelhardt Tom Mysiewicz Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Torin Murphy Tracy Rosenberg Travis LeBlanc Trevor Lynch Vernon Thorpe Virginia Dare Vito Klein Vladimir Brovkin Vladimir Putin Vladislav Krasnov Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walt King Walter E. Block Warren Balogh Washington Watcher Washington Watcher II Wayne Allensworth Wei Ling Chua Wesley Muhammad White Man Faculty Whitney Webb Wilhelm Kriessmann Wilhem Ivorsson Will Jones Will Offensicht William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Wyatt Peterson Wyatt Reed Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen Yaroslav Podvolotskiy Yvonne Lorenzo Zhores Medvedev
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2020 Election Academia American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Black Crime Black Lives Matter Blacks Britain Censorship China China/America Conspiracy Theories Covid Culture/Society Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Gaza Genocide Hamas History Holocaust Ideology Immigration IQ Iran Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Joe Biden NATO Nazi Germany Neocons Open Thread Political Correctness Race/Ethnicity Russia Science Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 汪精衛 100% Jussie-free Content 1984 2008 Election 2012 Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2022 Election 2024 Election 23andMe 9/11 Abortion Abraham Lincoln Academy Awards Achievement Gap ACLU Acting White Adam Schiff Addiction ADL Admin Administration Admixture Adolf Hitler Advertising AfD Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Age Age Of Malthusian Industrialism Agriculture AI AIPAC Air Force Aircraft Carriers Airlines Airports Al Jazeera Al Qaeda Alain Soral Alan Clemmons Alan Dershowitz Albania Albert Einstein Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Alejandro Mayorkas Alex Jones Alexander Dugin Alexander Vindman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Alexei Navalny Algeria Ali Dawabsheh Alison Nathan Alt Right Altruism Amazon Amazon.com America America First American Civil War American Dream American History American Indians American Israel Public Affairs Committee American Jews American Left American Nations American Presidents American Prisons American Renaissance Amerindians Amish Amnesty Amnesty International Amos Hochstein Amy Klobuchar Anarchism Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Greece Ancient Rome Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Bacevich Andrew Yang Anglo-America Anglo-imperialism Anglo-Saxons Anglos Anglosphere Angola Animal IQ Animals Ann Coulter Anne Frank Anthony Blinken Anthony Fauci Anthrax Anthropology Anti-Defamation League Anti-Gentilism Anti-Vaccination Anti-Vaxx Anti-white Animus Antifa Antifeminism Antiquity Antiracism Antisemitism Antisemitism Awareness Act Antisocial Behavior Antizionism Antony Blinken Apartheid Apartheid Israel Apollo's Ascent Appalachia Apple Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaeogenetics Archaeology Architecture Arctic Arctic Sea Ice Melting Argentina Ariel Sharon Armageddon War Armenia Armenian Genocide Army Arnold Schwarzenegger Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Lichte Artificial Intelligence Arts/Letters Aryan Invasion Theory Aryans Aryeh Lightstone Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians Assassination Assassinations Assimilation Atheism Atlanta AUMF Auschwitz Austin Metcalf Australia Australian Aboriginals Automation Avril Haines Ayn Rand Azerbaijan Azov Brigade Babes And Hunks Baby Gap Balfour Declaration Balkans Balochistan Baltics Baltimore Riots Banjamin Netanyahu Banking Industry Banking System Banks #BanTheADL Barack Obama Baseball Statistics Bashar Al-Assad Basketball BBC BDS BDS Movement Beauty Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Belarus Belgium Belgrade Embassy Bombing Ben Cardin Ben Rhodes Ben Shapiro Ben Stiller Benny Gantz Bernard Henri-Levy Bernie Sanders Betar US Betsy DeVos Betty McCollum Bezalel Smotrich Bezalel Yoel Smotrich Biden BigPost Bilateral Relations Bilingual Education Bill Clinton Bill De Blasio Bill Gates Bill Kristol Bill Maher Bill Of Rights Billionaires Billy Graham Bioethics Biology Bioweapons Birmingham Birth Rate Bitcoin Black Community Black History Month Black Muslims Black People Black Slavery BlackLivesMatter Blackmail Blake Masters Blank Slatism BLM Blog Blogging Blogosphere Blond Hair Blood Libel Blue Eyes Boasian Anthropology Boeing Boers Bolshevik Revolution Bolshevik Russia Bolshevism Books Boomers Border Wall Boris Johnson Bosnia Boycott Divest And Sanction Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Bret Stephens Bretton Woods Brexit Brezhnev Bri Brian Mast BRICs British Empire British Labour Party British Politics Buddhism Build The Wall Bulldog Bush Business BYD Byzantine Caitlin Johnstone California Californication Camp Of The Saints Canada Canary Mission Cancer Candace Owens Capitalism Carlos Slim Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Cars Carthaginians Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Cats Caucasus CBS News CCP CDC Ceasefire Census Central Asia Central Intelligence Agency Chabad Chanda Chisala Chaos And Order Charles De Gaulle Charles Kushner Charles Lindbergh Charles Manson Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charlie Hebdo Charlie Kirk Charlottesville ChatGPT Checheniest Chechen Of Them All Chechens Chechnya Chetty Chicago Chicagoization Chicken Hut Child Abuse Children Chile China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese IQ Chinese Language Christian Zionism Christian Zionists Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Christopher Wray Chuck Schumer CIA Cinema Citizenship Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil Rights Movement Civil War Civilization Clannishness Clash Of Civilizations Class Classical Antiquity Classical History Classical Music Clayton County Climate Change Clint Eastwood Clintons Coal Coalition Of The Fringes Coen Brothers Cognitive Elitism Cognitive Science Cold Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard College Admission College Football Colombia Colonialism Color Revolution Columbia University Columbus Comic Books Communism Computers Confederacy Confederate Flag Confucianism Congress Conquistador-American Conservatism Conservative Movement Conservatives Conspiracy Theory Constantinople Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumerism Controversial Book Convergence Core Article Corona Corporatism Corruption COTW Counterpunch Country Music Cousin Marriage Cover Story COVID-19 Craig Murray Creationism Crime Crimea Crimean War Crispr Critical Race Theory Cruise Missiles Crusades Crying Among The Farmland Crypto Cryptocurrency Ctrl-Left Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckery Cuckservative CUFI Cuisine Cultural Marxism Cultural Revolution Culture Culture War Czech Republic DACA Daily Data Dump Dallas Shooting Damnatio Memoriae Dan Bilzarian Danny Danon Daren Acemoglu Darwinism Darya Dugina Data Data Analysis Dave Chappelle David Bazelon David Brog David Cole David Duke David Friedman David Frum David Irving David Lynch David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Of The West Deborah Lipstadt Debt Debt Jubilee Decadence Deep State DeepSeek Deficits Degeneracy Democracy Democratic Party Demograhics Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denmark Dennis Ross Department Of Education Department Of Homeland Security Deplatforming Deportation Abyss Deportations Derek Chauvin Detroit Development Dick Cheney Diet Digital Yuan Dinesh D'Souza Discrimination Disease Disinformation Disney Disparate Impact Disraeli Dissent Dissidence Diversity Diversity Before Diversity Diversity Pokemon Points Dmitry Medvedev DNA Dogs Dollar Domestic Surveillance Domestic Terrorism Doomsday Clock Dostoevsky Doug Emhoff Doug Feith Dresden Drone War Drones Drug Cartels Drug Laws Drugs Duterte Dysgenic Dystopia E. Michael Jones E. O. Wilson East Asia East Asian Exception East Asians East Turkestan Easter Eastern Europe Ebrahim Raisi Economic Development Economic History Economic Sanctions Economy Edmund Burke Foundation Education Edward Snowden Effective Altruism Effortpost Efraim Zurofff Egor Kholmogorov Egypt El Salvador Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2020 Election Fraud Elections Electric Cars Eli Rosenbaum Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elise Stefanik Elites Elizabeth Holmes Elizabeth Warren Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emmanuel Macron Emmett Till Employment Energy England Enoch Powell Entertainment Environment Environmentalism Epidemiology Equality Erdogan Eretz Israel Eric Zemmour Ernest Hemingway Espionage Espionage Act Estonia Ethics Ethics And Morals Ethiopia Ethnic Cleansing Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity Ethnocentricty EU Eugene Debs Eugenics Eurabia Eurasia Euro Europe European Genetics European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Genetics Evolutionary Psychology Existential Risks Eye Color Face Shape Facebook Faces Fake News False Flag Attack Family Fantasy FARA Farmers Fascism Fast Food FBI FDA FDD Federal Reserve FEMA Feminism Ferguson Ferguson Shooting Fermi Paradox Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates FIFA Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Finland Finn Baiting First Amendment First World War FISA Fitness Flash Mobs Flight From White Floyd Riots 2020 Fluctuarius Argenteus Flynn Effect Food Football For Fun Forecasts Foreign Agents Registration Act Foreign Aid Foreign Policy Fox News France Francesca Albanese Frank Salter Frankfurt School Franklin D. Roosevelt Franz Boas Fraud Fred Kagan Free Market Free Speech Free Trade Freedom Of Speech Freedom Freemasons French French Revolution Friedrich Karl Berger Friends Of The Israel Defense Forces Frivolty Frontlash Furkan Dogan Future Futurism G20 Gambling Game Game Of Thrones Gavin McInnes Gavin Newsom Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza Flotilla GDP Gen Z Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Equality Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Genealogy General Intelligence General Motors Generation Z Generational Gap Genes Genetic Diversity Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genomics Gentrification Geography Geopolitics George Bush George Floyd George Galloway George Patton George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush Georgia Germans Germany Ghislaine Maxwell Gilad Atzmon Gina Peddy Giorgia Meloni Gladwell Glenn Greenwald Global Warming Globalism Globalization Globo-Homo God Gold Golf Gonzalo Lira Google Government Government Debt Government Spending Government Surveillance Government Waste Grant Smith Graphs Great Bifurcation Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Powers Great Replacement Greece Greeks Greenland Greg Cochran Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Greta Thunberg Grooming Group Selection GSS Guardian Guest Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns GWAS Gypsies H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Haiti Hajnal Line Halloween HammerHate Hannibal Procedure Happening Happiness Harvard Harvard University Harvey Weinstein Hassan Nasrallah Hate Crimes Fraud Hoax Hate Hoaxes Hate Speech Hbd Hbd Chick Health Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Hegira Height Hell Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Heredity Heritability Heritage Foundation Hezbollah High Speed Rail Hillary Clinton Hindu Caste System Hindus Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanics Historical Genetics History Of Science Hitler HIV/AIDS Hoax Holland Hollywood Holocaust Denial Holocaust Deniers Homelessness Homicide Homicide Rate Hominin Homomania Homosexuality Hong Kong Houellebecq Housing Houthis Howard Kohr Huawei Huddled Masses Huey Newton Hugo Chavez Human Achievement Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Evolutionary Genetics Human Evolutionary Genomics Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Rights Human Rights Watch Humor Hungary Hunt For The Great White Defendant Hunter Biden Hypersonic I.F. Stone I.Q. I.Q. Genomics #IBelieveInHavenMonahan ICC Icj Ideas Identity Ideology And Worldview IDF Idiocracy Igbo Ilan Pappe Ilhan Omar Illegal Immigration Ilyushin IMF Impeachment Imperialism Inbreeding Income Income Tax India Indian Indian IQ Indians Individualism Indo-Europeans Indonesia Inequality Inflation Intelligence Intelligence Agencies International International Comparisons International Court Of Justice International Criminal Court International Relations Internet Interracial Marriage Interracism Intersectionality Intifada Intra-Racism Intraracism Invade Invite In Hock Invade The World Invite The World Iosef Stalin Iosif Stalin Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish Is Love Colorblind Isaac Herzog ISIS Islam Islamic Jihad Islamic State Islamism Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Bonds Israel Defense Force Israel Defense Forces Israel Separation Wall Israeli Occupation IT Italy Itamar Ben-Gvir It's Okay To Be White Ivanka Ivy League J Street Jack Welch Jacky Rosen Jair Bolsonaro Jake Sullivan Jake Tapper Jamal Khashoggi James Angleton James B. Watson James Clapper James Comey James Forrestal James Jeffrey James Mattis James Watson James Zogby Janet Yellen Janice Yellen Japan Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Greenblatt JASTA Javier Milei JCPOA JD Vance Jeb Bush Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Goldberg Jeffrey Sachs Jen Psaki Jennifer Rubin Jens Stoltenberg Jeremy Corbyn Jerry Seinfeld Jerusalem Jerusalem Post Jesus Jesus Christ Jewish Genetics Jewish History Jewish Intellectuals Jewish Power Jewish Power Party Jewish Supremacism JFK Assassination JFK Jr. Jihadis Jill Stein Jimmy Carter Jingoism JINSA Joe Lieberman Joe Rogan John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John F. Kennedy John Hagee John Kirby John Kiriakou John McCain John McLaughlin John Mearsheimer John Paul Joker Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Greenblatt Jonathan Pollard Jordan Peterson Joseph Goebbels Joseph McCarthy Josh Gottheimer Josh Paul Journalism Judaism Judea Judge George Daniels Judicial System Judith Miller Julian Assange Jussie Smollett Justice Justin Trudeau Kaboom Kahanists Kaiser Wilhelm Kamala Harris Kamala On Her Knees Kanye West Karabakh War 2020 Karen Kwiatkowski Karine Jean-Pierre Karmelo Anthony Kash Patel Kashmir Katy Perry Kay Bailey Hutchison Kazakhstan Keir Starmer Kenneth Marcus Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Williamson Khazars Kids Kim Jong Un Kinship Kkk KKKrazy Glue Of The Coalition Of The Fringes Knesset Kompromat Korea Korean War Kosovo Kristi Noem Ku Klux Klan Kubrick Kurds Kushner Foundation Kyle Rittenhouse Kyrie Irving Language Laos Larry Ellison Larry C. Johnson Late Obama Age Collapse Latin America Latinos Laura Loomer Law Lawfare LDNR Lead Poisoning Leahy Amendments Leahy Law Lebanon Lee Kuan Yew Lenin Leo Frank Leo Strauss Let's Talk About My Hair LGBT LGBTI Liberal Opposition Liberal Whites Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libya Lindsey Graham Linguistics Literacy Literature Lithuania Litvinenko Living Standards Liz Cheney Liz Truss Lloyd Austin long-range-missile-defense Longevity Looting Lord Of The Rings Lorde Los Angeles Loudoun County Louis Farrakhan Love And Marriage Low-fat Lukashenko Lula Lynchings Lyndon B Johnson Lyndon Johnson Madeleine Albright Mafia MAGA Magda Goebbels Magnitsky Act Mahmoud Abbas Malaysia Malaysian Airlines MH17 Manufacturing Mao Zedong Maoism Map Marco Rubio Maria Butina Maria Corina Machado Marijuana Marine Le Pen Marjorie Taylor Greene Mark Levin Mark Milley Mark Steyn Mark Warner Market Economy Martin Luther King Martin Scorsese Marvel Marx Marxism Masculinity Mass Immigration Mass Shootings Mate Choice Mathematics Matt Gaetz Max Blumenthal Max Boot Max Weber Maxine Waters Mayans McCain McCain/POW McDonald's Meat Media Media Bias Medicine Medieval Christianity Medieval Russia Mediterranean Diet Medvedev Megan McCain Meghan Markle Mein Obama Mel Gibson Men With Gold Chains Meng Wanzhou Mental Health Mental Illness Meritocracy Merkel Merkel Youth Merkel's Boner Merrick Garland Mexico MH 17 MI-6 Michael Bloomberg Michael Collins PIper Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lind Michael McFaul Michael Moore Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michelle Goldberg Michelle Ma Belle Michelle Obama Microaggressions Middle Ages Middle East Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Johnson Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mike Waltz Mikhael Gorbachev Miles Mathis Militarized Police Military Military Analysis Military Budget Military History Military Spending Military Technology Millennials Milner Group Minimum Wage Minneapolis Minorities Minsk Accords Miriam Adelson Miscegenation Miscellaneous Misdreavus Mishima Missile Defense Mitch McConnell Mitt Romney Mixed-Race MK-Ultra Mohammed Bin Salman Monarchy Mondoweiss Money Mongolia Mongols Monkeypox Monopoly Monotheism Monroe Doctrine Moon Landing Hoax Moon Landings Morality Mormonism Mormons Mortality Mortgage Moscow Mossad Movies Muhammad Multiculturalism Multipolarity Music Muslim Ban Muslims Mussolini NAEP Naftali Bennett Nakba Nancy Pelos Nancy Pelosi Narendra Modi NASA Natanz Nation Of Hate Nation Of Islam National Assessment Of Educational Progress National Debt National Endowment For Democracy National Review National Security Strategy National Socialism National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans Natural Gas Nature Vs. Nurture Navalny Affair Navy Standards Nazis Nazism Neandertals Neanderthals Nehru Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Neoreaction Nesta Webster Netherlands Never Again Education Act New Cold War New Dark Age New Deal New Silk Road New Tes New Testament New World Order New York New York City New York Times New Zealand New Zealand Shooting NFL Nicholas II Nicholas Wade Nick Eberstadt Nick Fuentes Nicolas Maduro Nietzsche Niger Nigeria Nike Nikki Haley NIMBY Nina Jankowicz Noam Chomsky Nobel Peace Prize Nobel Prize Nord Stream Nord Stream Pipelines Nordics Norman Braman Norman Finkelstein North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway Novorossiya NSA NSO Group Nuclear Energy Nuclear Power Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Nuremberg Nutrition Nvidia NYPD Obama Obama Presidency Obamacare Obesity Obituary Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Wall Street October Surprise OFAC Oil Oil Industry OJ Simpson Olav Scholz Old Testament Oliver Stone Olympics Open Borders OpenThread Opinion Poll Opioids Orban Organized Crime Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Orwell Osama Bin Laden OTFI Ottoman Empire Our Soldiers Speak Out Of Africa Model Paganism Pakistan Pakistani Palantir Palestine Palestinians Palin Pam Bondi Panhandling Papacy Paper Review Parasite Burden Parenting Parenting Paris Attacks Partly Inbred Extended Family Pat Buchanan Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Craig Roberts Paul Findley Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Paypal Peak Oil Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Pentagon Personal Genomics Personality Pete Buttgieg Pete Hegseth Peter Frost Peter Thiel Petro Poroshenko Phil Rushton Philadelphia Philippines Philosophy Phoenicians Phyllis Randall Physiognomy Piers Morgan Pigmentation Pigs Piracy PISA Pizzagate POC Ascendancy Podcast Poetry Poland Police Police State Polio Political Correctness Makes You Stupid Political Dissolution Political Economy Politicians Politics Polling Pollution Polygamy Polygyny Pope Francis Population Population Genetics Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Porn Pornography Portland Portugal Portuguese Post-Apocalypse Postindustrialism Poverty Power Pramila Jayapal PRC Prediction Prescription Drugs President Joe Biden Presidential Race '08 Presidential Race '12 Presidential Race '16 Presidential Race '20 Prince Andrew Prince Harry Princeton University Priti Patel Privatization Progressives Propaganda Prostitution protest Protestantism Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion Proud Boys Psychology Psychometrics Psychopathy Public Health Public Schools Puerto Rico Puritans Putin Putin Derangement Syndrome QAnon Qasem Soleimani Qassem Soleimani Qatar Quantitative Genetics Quiet Skies R2P Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race/IQ Race-Ism Race Riots Rachel Corrie Racial Purism Racial Reality Racialism Racism Rafah Raj Shah Rand Paul Randy Fine Rape Rare Earths Rashida Tlaib Rasputin Rationality Ray McGovern Raymond Chandler Razib Khan Real Estate RealWorld Recep Tayyip Erdogan Reconstruction Red Sea Refugee Crisis Religion Religion And Philosophy Rentier Reparations Reprint Republican Party Republicans Review Revisionism Rex Tillerson RFK Assassination Ricci Richard Dawkins Richard Goldberg Richard Grenell Richard Haas Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Rightwing Cinema Riots R/k Theory RMAX Robert A. Heinlein Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Ford Robert Kagan Robert Kraft Robert Maxwell Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Reich Robots Rock Music Roe Vs. Wade Roger Waters Rolling Stone Roman Empire Romania Romans Romanticism Rome Ron DeSantis Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rotherham Rothschilds Roy Cohn RT International Rudy Giuliani Rush Limbaugh Russiagate Russian Demography Russian Elections 2018 Russian History Russian Media Russian Military Russian Nationalism Russian Occupation Government Russian Orthodox Church Russian Reaction Russians Russophobes Russophobia Rwanda Ryan Dawson Sabrina Rubin Erdely Sacha Baron Cohen Sacklers Sadism Sailer Strategy Sailer's First Law Of Female Journalism Saint Peter Tear Down This Gate! Saint-Petersburg Salman Rushie Salt Sam Altman Sam Bankman-Fried Sam Francis Samantha Power Samson Option San Bernadino Massacre Sandy Hook Sapir-Whorf SAT Satan Satanic Age Satanism Saudi Arabia Scandal Schizophrenia Science Fiction Scooter Libby Scotland Scott Bessent Scott Ritter Scrabble Secession Self Determination Self Indulgence Semites Serbia Sergei Lavrov Sergei Skripal Sergey Glazyev Seth Rich Sex Sex Differences Sexism Sexual Harassment Sexual Selection Sexuality Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shakespeare Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shireen Abu Akleh Shmuley Boteach Shoah Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shulamit Aloni Shurat HaDin Sigal Mandelker Sigar Pearl Mandelker Sigmund Freud Silicon Valley Singapore Sinotriumph Six Day War Sixties SJWs Skin Color Slavery Slavery Reparations Slavs Smart Fraction Social Justice Warriors Social Media Social Science Socialism Society Sociobiology Sociology Sodium Solzhenitsyn Somalia Sotomayor South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea Southeast Asia Soviet History Soviet Union Sovok Space Space Exploration Space Program Spain Spanish Spanish River High School SPLC Sport Sports Srebrenica Stabby Somali Staffan Stage Stalinism Standardized Tests Star Trek Star Wars Starvation Comparisons State Department Statistics Statue Of Liberty Steny Hoyer Stephen Cohen Stephen Jay Gould Stereotypes Steroids Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steve Witkoff Steven Pinker Steven Witkoff Strait Of Hormuz Strategic Ambiguity Stuart Levey Stuart Seldowitz Student Debt Stuff White People Like Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subhas Chandra Bose Subprime Mortgage Crisis Suburb Suella Braverman Sugar Suicide Superintelligence Supreme Court Surveillance Susan Glasser Svidomy Sweden Switzerland Symington Amendment Syria Syrian Civil War Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Take Action Taliban Talmud Tariff Tariffs Tatars Taxation Taxes Technical Considerations Technology Ted Cruz Telegram Television Terrorism Terrorists Terry McAuliffe Tesla Testing Testosterone Tests Texas THAAD Thailand The AK The American Conservative The Bell Curve The Bible The Black Autumn The Cathedral The Confederacy The Constitution The Eight Banditos The Family The Free World The Great Awokening The Guardian The Left The Middle East The New York Times The South The States The Zeroth Amendment To The Constitution Theranos Theresa May Third World Thomas Jefferson Thomas Massie Thomas Moorer Thought Crimes Tiananmen Massacre Tibet Tiger Mom TikTok TIMSS Tom Cotton Tom Massie Tom Wolfe Tony Blair Tony Blinken Tony Kleinfeld Too Many White People Torture Trade Trans Fat Trans Fats Transgender Transgenderism Transhumanism Translation Translations Transportation Travel Trayvon Martin Treason Trolling True Redneck Stereotypes Trump Trump Derangement Syndrome Trump Peace Plan Trust Trust Culture Tsarist Russia Tucker Carlson Tulsa Tulsi Gabbard Turkey Turks TWA 800 Twins Twitter Ucla UFOs UK Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unbearable Whiteness Unemployment United Kingdom United Nations United Nations General Assembly United Nations Security Council United States Universal Basic Income UNRWA Urbanization Ursula Von Der Leyen Uruguay US Blacks US Capitol Storming 2021 US Civil War II US Congress US Constitution US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 US State Department USA USAID USS Liberty USSR Uyghurs Uzbekistan Vaccination Vaccines Valdimir Putin Valerie Plame Vdare Venezuela Victor Davis Hanson Victoria Nuland Victorian England Video Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Viktor Orban Viktor Yanukovych Violence Vioxx Virginia Vitamin D Vivek Ramaswamy Vladimir Zelensky Volodymyr Zelensky Vote Fraud Voting Rights Voting Rights Act Vulcan Society Waffen SS Wall Street Walmart Wang Ching Wei Wang Jingwei War War Crimes War Guilt War In Donbass War On Christmas War On Terror War Powers War Powers Act Warhammer Washington DC WASPs Watergate Wealth Wealth Inequality Web Traffic Weight WEIRDO Welfare Wendy Sherman West Bank Western Decline Western European Marriage Pattern Western Hypocrisy Western Media Western Religion Western Revival Westerns White America White Americans White Death White Flight White Guilt White Helmets White Liberals White Man's Burden White Nationalism White Nationalists White People White Privilege White Race White Racialism White Slavery White Supremacy Whiterpeople Whites Whoopi Goldberg Wikileaks Wikipedia Wildfires William Browder William F. Buckley William Kristol William Latson William McGonagle William McRaven Wilmot Robertson WINEP Winston Churchill Woke Capital Women Woodrow Wilson Workers Working Class World Bank World Economic Forum World Health Organization World Population World War G World War H World War Hair World War I World War III World War R World War T WTF WVS WWII Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yahya Sinwar Yair Lapid Yemen Yevgeny Prigozhin Yoav Gallant Yogi Berra's Restaurant Yoram Hazony YouTube Yugoslavia Yuval Noah Harari Zbigniew Brzezinski Zimbabwe Zionism Zionists Zohran Mamdani Zvika Fogel
Nothing found
Filter?
Dmon
Comments
• My
Comments
1,477 Comments • 132,100 Words •  RSS
(Commenters may request that their archives be hidden by contacting the appropriate blogger)
All Comments
 All Comments
    Here’s a new Open Thread for everyone. For those interested, here are my more recent articles: The War of Goebbels’ Czech Mistress Ron Unz • The Unz Review • December 8, 2025 • 6,700 Words Donald Trump as Our President Caligula Ron Unz • The Unz Review • December 15, 2025 • 8,300 Words Donald...
  • @epebble
    @Buzz Mohawk

    Probably going to happen in at least a fraction of the cases. First, they marry for insurance, then love sprouts, then you get a baby. The modern idea of 'love' before marriage is a mostly 20th Century thing. For 99.9% of our existence, it was 'insurance' of some sort first, then love and babies.

    Replies: @Almost Missouri

    For 99.9% of our existence, it was ‘insurance’ of some sort first, then love and babies.

    That’s true. But it’s also true that for the same 99.9% of our existence the marital contract was a fairly normal sort of contract with privileges for observing it and penalties for breaking it. In the present 0.1% of existence, the marital contract is a perverse anti-contract with penalties for observing it and privileges for breaking it.

    [MORE]

    The consequences are as inevitable as they were foreseeable.

    Hekuva job, feminists.

    • Agree: Achmed E. Newman, Dmon
    • Thanks: kaganovitch
    • Replies: @epebble
    @Almost Missouri

    penalties for observing it and privileges for breaking it

    Though that is a problem, there are solutions being invented. Most locales have 'Domestic Partnership' or 'Civil Union' type institutions where some of those penalties can be lessened, if not removed entirely and privileges kept (or enhanced). Muslims have an entirely contract-based marriage (nikah) that seems to serve them. Even in Western societies, there have been alternate systems like 'Morganatic marriage' to reduce some penalties. Again, Islam has a form that is even more suitable to many of the short-term marriages prevalent today; they call it 'traveler marriage'.

    Replies: @Almost Missouri

  • @YetAnotherAnon
    Another immigration triumph. Trust the plan !

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/11/onlyfans-influencers-us-o-1-visa

    Content creators and influencers in the US are now increasingly dominating requests for O-1 work visas. Astoundingly, the number of O-1 visas granted each year increased by 50% between 2014 and 2024, as noted by recent reporting in the Financial Times.

    These visas allow non-immigrants to work temporarily in the US. The O-1 category includes the O-1A, which is designated for individuals with extraordinary ability in the sciences, education, business or athletics and the O-1B, reserved for those with “extraordinary ability or achievement”.

    The O-1B visa, once reserved for Hollywood titans and superstar musicians, has evolved over the years.

    “We started doing [O-1 visa applications] for kids who are e-sport players and influencers and the OnlyFans crew,” said Michael Wildes, an immigration attorney and managing partner of Wildes & Weinberg. “It’s the new, sexy medium for people to be a part of.”

    The rise in content creators applying for visas given out on the basis of “extraordinary ability” has garnered a variety of reactions. Dominic Michael Tripi, a political analyst and writer, posted on X that the trend was indicative of “end-stage empire conditions. It’s sad.” Legal professionals like Wildes, however, argue that the creator economy is the next frontier of American exceptionalism.

    “Influencers are filling a large gap in the retail and commercial interests of the world,” he said. “They’re moving content and purchases like no other. Immigration has to keep up with this.”

    Ain also takes issue with the criticism of influencers applying for O-1 visas, as well as the notion that influencing is not a legitimate profession.

    “I don’t think [people] realize how much work actually goes into it,” she said. “You might not agree with the way the money is being made, or what people are watching, but people are still watching and paying for it.”

    She continued: “Maybe 50 years ago, this isn’t what people imagined the American dream would look like. But this is what the American dream is now.”
     

    Replies: @Dmon

    I guess I’m behind the times, but why do you actually have to be present in the US to show your titties on Only Fans?

    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    @Dmon

    You don't, and if you come from {insert craphole here} you could be relatively rich in your own country on the Yankee dollar. OTOH, if you're a pretty girl AND can get to the States on your visa, you might find a wealthy guy and just forget how you earned your living. Or you might find another Epstein figure. Or you might get your throat cut on public transport like that poor Ukrainian girl.

  • @Hypnotoad666
    @Jenner Ickham Errican


    You’re not ‘grokking’ the point of stopping a dangerous perp. It isn’t just to save himself, it’s to save others as well. (Ya know: serve and protect.) She proved herself to be extremely reckless to the point of endangering someone’s life, from that instant she is categorized as armed and dangerous (and unwilling to be arrested).

     

    Stop already with this bullshit cope that she was
    a homicidal maniac on the loose with a weapon of mass destruction (her Honda Pilot). Any honest person with eyes can see that she was just an annoying leftist middle aged white chick. (That's like 25% of the population in case you hadn't noticed).

    You sound EXACTLY like the people who claimed Ashlee Babbit was properly killed because she might have theoretically tried to hang Mike Pence or that Randy Weaver's wife needed to be shot because she could have put her baby down and gone for a gun later.

    ‘Legal procedure’ concerns aside, isn’t it better she’s dead? Why are you simping for a dangerous traitor?
     
    That's the heart of the problem right there. You identify with a cop who you believe had a legal OPPORTUNITY to kill someone you don't like, even if he obviously didn't have to.

    So you are simping for armed government force with an "opportunity" to kill. The problem is that there are plenty of government agents out there who are inclined to think that YOU might be better off dead. And they can easily invent convenient rationales for why you might be a potential menace to society who ought to be neutralized.

    At the current time, we are all better off having objectively reasonable restraints on the government's power to kill us. And it's important that these should apply to everyone. This is especially true as our society seems to be going "full Israeli" lately. We might think we will get to play the Jew in that system with the whip hand, but we might instead end up as the Palestinians. Who, Whom? Etc.

    Replies: @Dmon, @Almost Missouri, @epebble, @Jenner Ickham Errican

    The problem is that there are plenty of government agents out there who are inclined to think that YOU might be better off dead. And they can easily invent convenient rationales for why you might be a potential menace to society who ought to be neutralized.

    Toad, I agree with you in the universe where everyone plays by the same rules. Unfortunately, that universe and this universe parted timelines long ago. In this universe, they already had the rationale, blew away Ashley, and gave the killer a medal and a promotion. Ditto Randy Weaver’s wife, and so on. They will already do the same to you as soon as they get an Opportunity, irrespective of whatever “objectively reasonable restraints” anyone here works out. Those restraints won’t apply to them when they don’t want them to. They will only apply to you, and then only as a prelude to your reframing as the next JamesFieldsTravisMcMichaelDerekChauvin, who also thought they were exercising “objectively reasonable restraint”.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    @Almost Missouri

    “In this universe, they already had the rationale, blew away Ashley”

    Isn’t the lesson here for a law abiding person NOT to ignore rarely law enforcement warnings to leave the premises of a federal building, not to be part of a violent mob that was bashing the doors into a restricted area, and to not endanger themself by climbing into a window where there are police officers saying to stop and retreat?

  • Odd. I could have sworn that the Great Replacement was a racist conspiracy theory with no supporting evidence!

    https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jan/10/trump-immigration-whiteness

    Why the white America Trump dreams of is just a fantasy
    Eduardo Porter

    Here’s one reason Donald Trump seems perennially in a bad mood: he has probably figured out that the America he fantasizes about is out of his reach.

    However many immigrants he manages to deport or prevent from entering the country, the white paradise he is promising his Maga base, free of Somalis, Mexican “rapists” and generally people from “shithole countries” – closer in hue to the America where he was born – is not his to offer.

    Trump is not the first politician to try to protect their conviction about the whiteness of America’s racial stock from “foreign” contamination. The national-origin immigration quotas in the Johnson-Reed Act of 1924 were quite successful at doing this. In 1960, 75% of immigrants to the US came from Europe.

    But the levee broke. The Hart-Celler Act of 1965 replaced national-origin with family ties. These days only about 10% of immigrants hail from Europe. More than half come from Latin America. When Trump was four, white people accounted for nine in 10 Americans (the census did not ask about Hispanic ethnicity). By 2024, the non-Hispanic white share had slid to 57.5%.

    Nothing Trump does to stop immigration can change this trajectory. Because the non-Hispanic white population will keep on shrinking regardless, the Census Bureau projects that it will lose 3.6 million people over the next five years, almost 11 million in the decade after that and more than 14 million in the subsequent one.

    • Thanks: Dmon
  • Despite Sterilization Efforts, Racist Claims Persist Amid Long-Standing Tensions

    A sauna in China has faced criticism from locals for allowing Indian visitors, sparking a controversy. The sauna’s sales reportedly plummeted by about 90% after it became known that Indian visitors had been there.

    According to Chinese local social media on the 24th, three Indian men working at foreign companies in China recently uploaded a video of their visit to a high-end sauna in Harbin, China. The men praised the sauna’s luxurious bathing facilities and relaxation areas in the video, showing themselves using various services. They also expressed surprise that beverages, fruits, and ice cream were provided for free.

    While their video became a major topic of discussion in China, the sauna’s sales actually plummeted. This was because Chinese people began protesting, claiming that Indians have poor hygiene and that the sauna they visited should not be used.

    The sauna operator stated that they had replaced the bathwater and sterilized the tubs and showers according to established regulations after the Indian visitors, but to no avail. According to the sauna operator, the Indian guests quietly washed themselves and left during their visit, demonstrating mature civic consciousness by folding and leaving the towels they had used. Despite this, the sauna’s sales reportedly plummeted by 90% within a week.

    Chinese netizens poured out racist responses, such as “Indians might have urinated or defecated in the bath” and “Indians usually bathe in rivers mixed with filth.”

    https://archive.is/DScJZ

    • Thanks: Achmed E. Newman, MEH 0910
    • LOL: Dmon
    • Replies: @Old Prude
    @J.Ross

    Once again demonstrating why the future belongs to China.

    In America one can’t drive by a motel without shuddering. It’s better to rent a Sprinter Van than risk the filth from an Indian run establishment.

    , @YetAnotherAnon
    @J.Ross

    “Indians usually bathe in rivers mixed with filth.”

    In Varanasi (Benares as was, the holy city on the Ganges) people swim in and across the river. They must have impressive immune systems - one of our party dipped her foot in up to above the ankle and it went bright red. It's slightly concerning to see bed sheets drying along the banks - were they 'washed' in the river?

    (Nonetheless we enjoyed our stay, wonderfully chaotic place. Crossing the road is quite an adventure.)

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

  • @Corvinus
    @Dmon

    “That is the crux of the problem. The Michael Byrds and the Lon Horiuchis and the Janet Renos go scot free”

    Lou’s first shot met the standard of 'objective reasonableness' the Constitution requires for the legal use of deadly force. Damn our legal system!

    “while the Derek Chauvin’s get stabbed in prison “

    Well, the lesson is for cops to not put a knee on a perp’s back for 9 minutes which contributed to a death.

    “J6 trespassers get locked up.”

    Well, the lesson for people is not to illegal enter a building and refuse to leave despite law enforcement commands or damage federal property.

    Replies: @kaganovitch, @Dmon

    “Lou’s first shot met the standard of ‘objective reasonableness’ the Constitution requires for the legal use of deadly force. Damn our legal system!”

    And Lon’s second shot killed a woman who was threatening agents by brandishing an illegally modified 10 month old baby.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruby_Ridge_standoff#:~:text=During%20a%20surveillance%20operation%2C%20officer,son%2C%20Samuel%2C%20who%20was%20armed.

    The RRTF report to the DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) of June 1994 stated unequivocally in conclusion (in its executive summary) that the rules that allowed the second shot to have been made did not satisfy constitutional standards for legal use of deadly force.[90]

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    @Dmon

    “And Lon’s second shot killed a woman who was threatening agents by brandishing an illegally modified 10 month old baby.”

    Yes, that’s tragic. But then the lesson learned here is not to be around people who shoot at federal agents.

  • @Old Prude
    @OilcanFloyd

    It doesn’t bother me a bit that this fool lady was shot. It isn’t helpful, however to have the DHS lady with the awesome hair, put on an oversized cowboy hat and blather about “domestic terrorism”. Same for JD Vance.

    It would be more effective, to say “Listen, folks, these guys are working to protect you. If you get in their way, or fool around with them, you are liable to get shot when things get out of hand. This guy was just doing the work the American public needs done.”

    Replies: @Almost Missouri, @Mike Tre

    It would be more effective, to say “Listen, folks, these guys are working to protect you. If you get in their way, or fool around with them, you are liable to get shot when things get out of hand. This guy was just doing the work the American public needs done.”

    It’s a little worse than that. Renee was actively making “things get out hand”. She was deliberately interfering in and obstructing a law enforcement operation, endangering the lives of officers. To add insult to injury, she and her “partner” were sarcastically mocking the officers they were obstructing, demonstrating their (false) sense of legal invulnerability, a sense fostered by cynical liars all the way up the Democrat hierarchy. Now she’s misfortunately, but sort of inevitably, dead.

    “Domestic terrorism” may be an exaggeration by earlier definitions, but now that Democrats have normalized new definitions of “domestic terrorism”, including black-letter First Amendment-protected petitioning for redress of grievances, they can wear their own redefining around their own slack necks.

    • Thanks: MEH 0910
  • @Hypnotoad666
    @Jenner Ickham Errican


    You’re not ‘grokking’ the point of stopping a dangerous perp. It isn’t just to save himself, it’s to save others as well. (Ya know: serve and protect.) She proved herself to be extremely reckless to the point of endangering someone’s life, from that instant she is categorized as armed and dangerous (and unwilling to be arrested).

     

    Stop already with this bullshit cope that she was
    a homicidal maniac on the loose with a weapon of mass destruction (her Honda Pilot). Any honest person with eyes can see that she was just an annoying leftist middle aged white chick. (That's like 25% of the population in case you hadn't noticed).

    You sound EXACTLY like the people who claimed Ashlee Babbit was properly killed because she might have theoretically tried to hang Mike Pence or that Randy Weaver's wife needed to be shot because she could have put her baby down and gone for a gun later.

    ‘Legal procedure’ concerns aside, isn’t it better she’s dead? Why are you simping for a dangerous traitor?
     
    That's the heart of the problem right there. You identify with a cop who you believe had a legal OPPORTUNITY to kill someone you don't like, even if he obviously didn't have to.

    So you are simping for armed government force with an "opportunity" to kill. The problem is that there are plenty of government agents out there who are inclined to think that YOU might be better off dead. And they can easily invent convenient rationales for why you might be a potential menace to society who ought to be neutralized.

    At the current time, we are all better off having objectively reasonable restraints on the government's power to kill us. And it's important that these should apply to everyone. This is especially true as our society seems to be going "full Israeli" lately. We might think we will get to play the Jew in that system with the whip hand, but we might instead end up as the Palestinians. Who, Whom? Etc.

    Replies: @Dmon, @Almost Missouri, @epebble, @Jenner Ickham Errican

    “At the current time, we are all better off having objectively reasonable restraints on the government’s power to kill us. And it’s important that these should apply to everyone.”

    That is the crux of the problem. The Michael Byrds and the Lon Horiuchis and the Janet Renos go scot free, while the Derek Chauvin’s get stabbed in prison and J6 trespassers get locked up. If the restraints on government force applied to everyone, there probably wouldn’t be a controversy in this case. But that ship left port a while ago.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    @Dmon

    “That is the crux of the problem. The Michael Byrds and the Lon Horiuchis and the Janet Renos go scot free”

    Lou’s first shot met the standard of 'objective reasonableness' the Constitution requires for the legal use of deadly force. Damn our legal system!

    “while the Derek Chauvin’s get stabbed in prison “

    Well, the lesson is for cops to not put a knee on a perp’s back for 9 minutes which contributed to a death.

    “J6 trespassers get locked up.”

    Well, the lesson for people is not to illegal enter a building and refuse to leave despite law enforcement commands or damage federal property.

    Replies: @kaganovitch, @Dmon

  • @Pericles
    @Pericles

    Their anti-ICE anarchist pals were not dissuaded.



    The frenzied crowd flooded the outside of the Hilton Canopy Hotel — and some parts of the interior — blowing whistles and banging on drums while chanting “f–k ICE” and waving various signs calling for the federal agency to “GET THE F–K OUT OF MN,” according to social media videos and the Daily Mail.

    “They need to get the hell out of our city,” a pink-haired demonstrator, 27, told the outlet.

    “I don’t know for sure they are here but we will do whatever it takes to keep Minneapolis safe.”

     

    https://nypost.com/2026/01/10/us-news/minneapolis-protesters-surround-hilton-canopy-hotel-believed-holding-federal-agents-after-renee-nicole-good-ice-shooting/

    Safe indeed, as we have seen over the years. Minneapolis is run by crooks and crazies, for the benefit of crooks and crazies.

    Replies: @Dmon

    “Safe indeed, as we have seen over the years. Minneapolis is run by crooks and crazies, for the benefit of crooks and crazies.”

    Indeed. Based on precedent, it’s hard to see what Waltz/Frey/etc. are getting so jacked up about.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Justine_Damond#
    On the night of the shooting,

    Damond called 9-1-1 at 11:27 p.m. and again at 11:35 p.m.[21] She reported that she thought she heard a woman either having sex or being raped.[22] Dispatchers categorized the call as “unknown trouble: female screaming”—a relatively low priority. Officers Noor and Harrity responded to the low-crime neighborhood of Fulton, in southwestern Minneapolis, drove their police Ford Explorer with lights off through the alley[23] and found no suspects or signs of the suspected rape that had prompted Damond’s calls.[24]

    As the officers prepared to leave, Noor “entered ‘Code Four’ into the cruiser’s computer, meaning the scene was safe”.[23] Harrity would later indicate “that he was startled by a loud sound near the squad” and, just then, Damond approached the police car’s driver-side window.[25] Harrity drew his weapon, but pointed it downward and did not fire.[26] Noor, however, fired once through the open window, fatally striking an unarmed and barefoot Damond in the abdomen.

    For unprovoked shooting of an unarmed woman, Noor was convicted of 2nd degree manslaughter, and his sentence was eventually reduced to 38 months in prison.

    • Agree: Almost Missouri
    • Replies: @Hypnotoad666
    @Dmon


    For unprovoked shooting of an unarmed woman, Noor was convicted of 2nd degree manslaughter, and his sentence was eventually reduced to 38 months in prison.
     
    Thanks for the update on that old case. The Wikipedia write up is very unsatisfying in at least one regard: Noor seems to have never offered any explanation of what happened, why he shot a woman for no conceivable reason, or what entered his head at any point. He refused to speak to investigators and presumably refused to testify as well.

    There doesn't seem to be a speck of evidence that could support any objective or subjective reason for his pulling the trigger.

    But the MN Appellate Court apparently decided that a jury isn't permitted to infer a "depraved state of mind" from an apparently purposeless killing. Seems like a loophole to me -- that a jury can't assume a bad state of mind when the defendant refuses to provide any explanation or evidence of his thinking whatsoever. But I guess that's supposed to uphold the right against self-incrimination, or something.

    Maybe it was some kind of Somali mind glitch that they have. Anyway, the original police report summarizes the situation in perfect passive Cop-speak:


    it is unknown to BCA agents what exactly happened, but the female became deceased in the alley."
     

    Replies: @James B. Shearer

  • @James B. Shearer
    @Nicholas Stix

    "N.S.: No. The mass murder at Sandy Hook was 13 years ago. I watched the CT state police press conference (it was one trooper speaking) on the tv news at the time, and about one week later, I saw H. Wayne Carver II’s press conference on TV. I wrote about both press conferences at the time, but I never had links. So, you just call me any names you please to, pussy."

    So why should we believe the initial report and not the later reports?

    Replies: @deep anonymous, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Nicholas Stix

    “So why should we believe the initial report and not the later reports?”

    Time was, the initial report on an incident was preliminary, and then reporters would set about getting more information and correcting it. However, in recent years, at least since 9/11, I have increasingly noticed that the initial report is the best you’ll get, after which the authorities and the msm get together and get their lies straight, or simply “forget” the matter.

    I emphasized 9/11, because on that day, there was one report that a fake pilot in uniform was caught trying to board a fifth airliner, and that the clean-up crew on a fifth airliner (don’t recall if it was the same airliner in both cases) found box-cutters stuffed between or within passengers’ seats.

    Had those reports been false, the media would later have issued corrections, saying that they had received false rumors that did not check out. But they didn’t say that. They said nothing.

    In recent years, I have written on several crimes in NYC, in which murder victims who were initially reported on, “disappeared” from later reports, without any explanation. (In other cases, e.g., Kea Fiedler and Jaclyn Almquist, I caught the cops lying through their teeth to begin with. With Fiedler, the nycpd pulled a stunt it had pulled with murdered actress-moviemaker, Adrienne Shelly. Shelly was strangled in her office by an illegal alien; the cops asserted that she’d committed suicide. Shelly’s family raised holy h-e-c-k, and got her death re-investigated. However, Kea Fiedler (October 19, 2015) was a German grad student at the New School. Although her classmates and profs were outraged, her family was unable to get her murder re-opened. 19 or 20 days after Melanie Liverpool-Turner murdered Fiedler, she murdered Connie Watton. Same m.o., and again the killer immediately confessed. This time, the nycpd thought maybe it ought to do its job. Liverpool-Turner was convicted of Connie Watton’s murder, sentenced to 20 years inside, and the panic-stricken murderer hanged herself in her prison cell. No nycpd detectives who had covered up the murder of Kea Fiedler ever re-classified the crime, or are known to have done the right thing.)

    In one case on February 12, 2024 in the Bronx, the nycpd’s “white shirts” called a press conference on the street below the elevated station where two (venezuelan?) gangs had reportedly shot and killed two passengers, an hour later (5 p.m.), but refused to answer reporters’ questions. The first reported vic was a teenaged girl, 15, whom a gangster had shot in the face. A report later that afternoon told of a mexican illegal, Obed Beltrán-Sánchez, a 35-year-old man from Tehuacan, who was also shot and killed on the same train, only now the dead girl was “disappeared.”

    That way, the nycpd holds 2-for-1 sales on murders.

    • Agree: Dmon
    • Thanks: Almost Missouri, Mike Tre
    • Replies: @Nicholas Stix
    @Nicholas Stix

    "Liverpool-Turner was convicted of Connie Watton’s murder, sentenced to 20 years inside, and the panic-stricken murderer hanged herself in her prison cell."

    Correction: and the guilt-stricken murderer hanged herself in her prison cell.

    , @James B. Shearer
    @Nicholas Stix

    "Time was, the initial report on an incident was preliminary, and then reporters would set about getting more information and correcting it. However, in recent years, at least since 9/11, I have increasingly noticed that the initial report is the best you’ll get, after which the authorities and the msm get together and get their lies straight, or simply “forget” the matter."

    Some version of the initial New York Times story (dated 12/14/2012) about Sandy Hook can be found here . It states in part:

    "Law enforcement officials said the weapons used by the gunman were a Sig Sauer and a Glock, both handguns. The police also found a Bushmaster .223 M4 carbine."

    However there is also an appended correction:

    "A correction was made on Dec. 17, 2012: A correction posted with an earlier version of this article was published in error. As the initial article correctly noted, the gunman in the Connecticut shooting used a rifle to carry out the shootings inside the Sandy Hook Elementary School; he did not use two handguns. (He did use a handgun to kill himself.)"

    So why shouldn't I believe the correction?

  • @MEH 0910
    David French reacting to the first video, before the ICE agent's cellphone video was released:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/10/opinion/trump-donroe-doctrine-ice-minneap
    https://archive.is/w3Nuw

    French:
    [...]
    And so you put all of that stuff together and then you add on top of that a poor woman is barely dead and already the administration’s calling her a domestic terrorist. Anyone can look at that video — and I think a fair viewing of the video — the worst thing you can say about her is that she panicked and responded in the wrong way in response to a very confusing situation. That is the worst thing you can say. There’s zero evidence that there is domestic terrorism here.

    The worst thing that you could say, I don’t think, is even necessarily accurate, either. It looked like she was trying to wave agents past to allow them to pass her and then back up and go down the road herself. Someone comes and grabs her door inexplicably; she’s turning away. It’s very, very fast. It’s very, very quick. But it is not one of those situations where you could say, “Oh, I can totally, clearly, plainly see how this person was defying the police.”

    It looked to me like a very confusing situation that just escalated so quickly, so dramatically, in such a deadly way that this is exactly what so many of us have been worrying about.
     

    Replies: @Nicholas Stix, @Dmon, @MEH 0910

    “It looked to me like a very confusing situation that just escalated so quickly, so dramatically, in such a deadly way that this is exactly what so many of us have been worrying about.”

    They’re always so worried about people’s health.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/news/politico-reporter-launches-thinly-veiled-threat-at-youtuber-who-exposed-somali-daycare-fraud/ar-AA1TiEKR

    Politico senior legal affairs reporter Josh Gerstein claimed in a Monday post on X that citizen journalists investigating Somali scammers could be shot under “stand your ground” laws, which some commenters viewed as a threat.

    Gerstein, though he later denied the threat, hinted that violent confrontations could be imminent as other journalists

    These guys are like the mob selling “protection” to some Little Italy merchant – “Nice place ya got here. Be a shame if sumptin was ta happen to it”.

    • Replies: @A123
    @Dmon



    Politico senior legal affairs reporter Josh Gerstein claimed in a Monday post on X that citizen journalists investigating Somali scammers could be shot under “stand your ground” laws, which some commenters viewed as a threat.

    Gerstein, though he later denied the threat, hinted that violent confrontations could be imminent as other journalists
     
    These guys are like the mob selling “protection” to some Little Italy merchant – “Nice place ya got here. Be a shame if sumptin was ta happen to it”.
     
    The threat is even more obvious when you know that Minnesota has no “stand your ground” laws.

    It was an open call to violence against independent reporters. Was the mainstream media protecting -- Their sinecure? Their IslamoGloboHomo values? Or, both?

    PEACE 😇

  • @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Sam Malone

    400 words of vague complaints (“vicious arrogance”), but is there anything policy-wise from Trump that you object to? Or are you just going on emotion?

    Replies: @Dmon

    What you said exactly. I have trouble thinking of anything unconstitutional or unprecedented that Trump has done, other than simply enforce the written law of the United States. He’ll do something, some district court judge issues a restraining order, and Trump abides by it. It goes up through the courts, as it is supposed to, and he abides by the final decision. Sam Malone considers LBJ and Barack Obama to be more worthy of being entrusted with power than Trump. Well, LBJ faked the Gulf of Tonkin incident to gin up an intervention in Vietnam, and Obama ordered his DOJ to stage a coup against a duly elected president. Hell – at a considerably lower level of resistance than what Trump is encountering, Eisenhower had already sent the 101st Airborne to invade Arkansas (and he didn’t even have a written law backing him up).

    • Agree: Almost Missouri
    • Replies: @Corpse Tooth
    @Dmon

    The Venezuela Affair reeks of corporate gangster. But I admire the Hemisphere consolidation. The Imperial system might be the least of the bad options. Either way keep the neoliberal neocons away from power. With Trump unfortunately the neos have his ear.

    Replies: @J.Ross

  • @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Dmon


    But from a legal standpoint, if you ever want to shoot somebody who’s in a car, stand directly in front of them. If they do not stop, it is one of the few instances where you can claim an unmitigated right to self defense.
     
    Only if you’re not illegally detaining/blocking them.

    Replies: @Dmon

    I’m not sure about that. James Fields is serving a life sentence for murder even though he was being illegally detained.

    • Agree: YetAnotherAnon
    • Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Dmon


    I’m not sure about that. James Fields is serving a life sentence for murder even though he was being illegally detained.
     
    In some states it’s legal to plow through a crowd illegally blocking the road, in others it’s not. What was the law in VA at the time?

    Replies: @J.Ross

  • @Hypnotoad666
    @Corvinus


    Yep, it was excessive force.
     
    I am going to agree with Corvinis on this. I thought Ashlee Babbit was murdered in cold blood and I argued vehemently about it with all kinds of idiots, including never Trump RINOs and lots of "FAFO" retards. I thought Derrick Chauvin was absolutely framed and wrongly convicted and that anyone who claimed differently after watching the full body cam footage is either a liar or an anti-white or anti-cop bigot.

    Going way back, I even thought the Rodney King cops were properly exonerated after learning the context of the pullover, King's non-compliance, and the training/policy involved (i.e. they were supposed to beat a non-compliant arrestee on his thighs and buttocks to get him to lay down for handcuffing and arrest).

    I knew I was right on those cases because I saw what I saw and I believe my eyes. Same thing here. This was a BAD SHOOT by any remotely objective standard. I am actually really surprised and disappointed by all the RW commentators circling the wagons just because they like ICE and don't like lesbian libtards. But facts matter.

    That ICE agent was not going to be "run over." He could have easily stepped out of the way even if the car might have bumped into him as it was turning. And it would have been going about 4 mph and probably would've just gently pushed him out of the way at worst.

    Shooting the driver through the windshield was the least effective thing he could possibly have done to protect himself anyway. And putting a couple bonus rounds into the side of her head from near point blank range long after he was "safe" doesn't help his case either.

    Maybe this guy's actions can be mitigated legally or morally or the ground that he "just panicked" or had some "subjective" but unreasonable belief he was acting in self defense.

    From viewing his behavior and demeanor, however, I am personally more inclined to believe he was trigger happy and glad to have an apparent excuse to kill. (Like I said, he reminds me of that asshole Lt. Byrd who still needs to be prosecuted for murder before any ICE agent). Of course, it really didn't help that the libtards were obnoxiouly taunting the ICE guys.

    Anyway, this may be an unpopular opinion here, but I call it like I see it.

    Finally, as a separate but related issue, I am not a fan of this theater of having masked military in tactical gear confronting normies in the suburbs of Minnesota. You could deport infinity illegals by just cross referencing the fake SSNs from I-9s, welfare applications, bank records, and other docs. But that would be too easy.

    I suspect Trump wants to play both sides by rabble rousing his low-IQ base while simultaneously leaving his donors' cheap labor force in place.

    Replies: @epebble, @Sam Malone, @Corpse Tooth, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Pericles, @Sam Hildebrand, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Corvinus, @Dmon

    “Shooting the driver through the windshield was the least effective thing he could possibly have done to protect himself anyway.”

    Maybe from a protection standpoint – who knows. But from a legal standpoint, if you ever want to shoot somebody who’s in a car, stand directly in front of them. If they do not stop, it is one of the few instances where you can claim an unmitigated right to self defense.

    • Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Dmon


    But from a legal standpoint, if you ever want to shoot somebody who’s in a car, stand directly in front of them. If they do not stop, it is one of the few instances where you can claim an unmitigated right to self defense.
     
    Only if you’re not illegally detaining/blocking them.

    Replies: @Dmon

  • @MEH 0910
    @Almost Missouri

    https://nypost.com/2026/01/08/us-news/renee-nicole-good-was-minneapolis-ice-watch-warrior-who-trained-to-resist-feds-before-shooting/
    https://archive.is/hSID4


    Renee Nicole Good was Minneapolis ‘ICE Watch’ ‘warrior’ who trained to resist feds before shooting

    MINNEAPOLIS — Renee Nicole Good, the mom who was killed by a federal agent after veering her car toward him, was an anti-ICE “warrior” and was part of a group of activists who worked to “document and resist” the federal immigration crackdown in Minnesota, The Post can reveal.

    Good, who moved to the city last year, linked up with the anti-ICE activists through her 6-year-old son’s woke charter school, which boasts that it puts “social justice first” and “involving kids in political and social activism,” multiple local sources said.
     

    “She was a warrior. She died doing what was right,” a mother named Leesa, whose child attends the same school, told The Post at a growing vigil where Good was killed Wednesday.

    Good and her wife Rebecca, 40, who were raising the child together and sent the boy to Southside Family Charter School, a K-5 academy opened in 1972 which has from its inception been “unabashedly dedicated to social justice education,” according to co-founder Susie Oppenheim.

    It was through her involvement in the school community that Good became involved in “ICE Watch” — a loose coalition of activists dedicated to disrupting ICE raids in the sanctuary city.

    “From my understanding, she was involved in social justice … we are a tight-knit community and a lot of parents are [activists],” former Southside gym teacher Rashad Rich, who resigned from the school last month, told The Post.

    He said current event topics like the killing of George Floyd were regular parts of the curriculum, and that last month students took a field trip where they learned about “aboriginal issues” — a reference to the indigneous people of far-away Australia.

    Similar coalitions have cropped up all over the country — with activists using phone apps, whistles and car horns to warn neighborhoods when ICE shows up. ICE Watch activists can also turn confrontational — with numerous instances of activists ramming agents with their cars in the past.

    “[Renee Good] was trained against these ICE agents — what to do, what not to do, it’s a very thorough training,” Leesa said.

    “To listen to commands, to know your rights, to whistle when you see an ICE agent,” she added.

    “I know she was doing the right thing. I watched the video plenty of times but I also know in my heart the woman she was, she was doing everything right.”

    ICE agents have faced an unprecedented spike in car attacks, surging by some 3,200% over the last year, shocking data released by the Department of Homeland Security revealed to The Post.
    [...]
    The Goods had no love lost for President Trump themselves, leaving their Kansas City, Missouri neighborhood to Canada after the 2024 election with plans to leave the country for good.

    They lived in the Great White North for a few months before settling in Minneapolis, a former neighbor toldKMBC.

    Rebecca, who was confronting ICE agents outside of the SUV at the time of the shooting, was filmed sobbing “it’s my fault” after the shots rang out and she realized Renee had been struck.

    “I made her come down here’ it’s my fault,” she said, her face covered in blood after rushing to her partner’s aid.

    “They shot her in the head. I have a 6-year-old in school,” she said.
     

    Replies: @Almost Missouri, @Dmon

    I initially read that as “ICE Witch”. Which is probably more accurate.

  • @Corpse Tooth
    @J.Ross

    Devil in the details on that one (BlackRock). Van Allen Belts btw are strips of leather designed for the large waisted. Nothing to do with radiation unless you include that one episode of Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea.

    Replies: @Dmon

    The Van Allen Belt is in the middle – his waist looks pretty normal. The Von Braun Belt is not visible, as he has his suit coat buttoned.

    • LOL: Almost Missouri
  • @Almost Missouri
    @kaganovitch

    We had this back on Threads 14 & 15.

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/isteve-open-thread-14/#comment-7386045

    Not complaining, just mentioning. More coverage of the UCSD farce is good.

    I second Buzz's comment that a lot of material here could be repackaged as a “Laugh or Cry; You Decide!” product. And as our most esteemed Cousin of Briscoe colleague, you may be the most qualified to market it.

    I don't know who Justin Skycak is, but he is—and most of the people covering this are—missing most of the story. They write as if the primary and secondary schools just somehow forgot to teach math to a bunch of their kids. And then the college(s) forgot to check if their students could do math before admitting them.

    That's not what happened at all. And presenting the story that way makes no sense anyhow.

    What actually happened is the leaders, up to the highest level of government, conspired to replace the existing population (who usually can do math, with or without expensive training), with a new lower-IQ, darker-skinned population (who often cannot do math even with expensive training). The leaders warped, distorted, and corrupted every institution in the path of their maniacal and so far mostly successful quest, and now they are seeing 'unforeseen' consequences, like technical college students who can't do fractions, while the young men who could do fractions languish in the family garret, or die on the streets of fentanyl.

    But on the bright side, their DEI targets were hit!

    Replies: @Dmon, @kaganovitch, @vinteuil

    Might as well have the tune to go with the lyrics.

    • Thanks: Almost Missouri
  • @YetAnotherAnon
    @Mr. Anon

    "dissident right has a “false flag” problem. They tend to subscribe to every conspiracy theory, no matter how crackpot"

    I also hang out at Moon Of Alabama for Ukraine commentary and news links, and there are a huge number of idiots and monomaniacs. I do wonder if some of them aren't deliberately posting to discredit the site or make the comments not worth ploughing through. There's one guy who thinks every bad thing in the world is down to "the English", even though the English are rapidly becoming a minority in all their cities, and another who tells us that everyone from Putin to Hitler (and all the Nazi elite) is or was Jewish.

    Replies: @Dmon, @Achmed E. Newman

    The entire US political and mainstream media establishment was unanimous for 5 years that the Wuhan Institute of Virology had absolutely nothing to do with covid-19, and you guys are worried that the dissident right has a problem with conspiracy theories?

  • @kaganovitch
    @Dmon

    Are you a member of SAG?

    Replies: @Buzz Mohawk, @Dmon

    I could be if I lay off the little blue pills.

    • LOL: Almost Missouri
  • @kaganovitch
    For the general delectation of our commentariat/community: Read it and laugh or weep as you are inclined ( Either choice is supportable, I think )


    https://twitter.com/lizcollin/status/2007940190220808349

    Replies: @Dmon, @Almost Missouri

    1. What’s the age limit?
    2. Will they pay for my plane fare there?

    • Replies: @kaganovitch
    @Dmon

    Are you a member of SAG?

    Replies: @Buzz Mohawk, @Dmon

  • @Bill Jones
    This really is the end to any pretense that the US is a Constitutional Republic.
    There will of course be some of the MAGA moron's who like this Caligula but who will not do well under the next one.

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman, @epebble, @Dmon, @Brutusale

    “This really is the end to any pretense that the US is a Constitutional Republic.”

    If the criterion is “arbitrary military interventions in foreign countries for the purpose of overthrowing the government, unaccompanied by an official declaration of war “, we blew past that milestone well over a century ago.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_Government_of_Santo_Domingo
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_Wars
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuel_Noriega
    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/clinton-on-qaddafi-we-came-we-saw-he-died/

    Heck – here’s a list starting in 1953 in Iran.
    https://www.newsweek.com/full-list-dictators-us-ousted-throughout-history-11304537

    And of course there are a number of other criteria we could use to establish the same point. I could argue that we haven’t been a constitutional republic since the civil war.

    • Thanks: Almost Missouri
    • Replies: @epebble
    @Dmon

    1953 Iranian coup d'état has been the most expensive of all as we have maintained mutual hatred with Iran for more than half a century involving us in many Middle-Eastern wars fomented by Iran. The most recent Iraq war that marked the beginning of U.S. decline is a descendent of the Frankenstein monster unleashed by the 1953 coup.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat

  • @Sam Hildebrand

    but that can’t be the real reason that the U.S. took Maduro out.
     
    The trade war with China is the real reason with China manipulating its currency by purchasing Venezuelan oil and Brazilian soybeans with yuans instead of dollars.

    Double hit to China, have to go back to buying oil with its dollar reserve (increasing yuan value to usd) and losing a cheap supply of sanctioned oil (good luck with all those Chinese heavy crude refineries).

    Trump’s tariffs on Chinese imports brought down Maduro.

    Replies: @Dmon

    There’s another potential benefit as well. Most US refineries are optimized for heavy crude. Heavy crude is particularly good for producing diesel, which has a significant impact on inflation – transportation, agriculture, mining all run on diesel. Trump is currently attempting to kick the inflation can down the road. The US doesn’t have many moves left with respect to the inflation or crash conundrum, but holding down the cost of diesel fuel is one of them. If installing a friendly puppet in Venezuela gets US oil companies to go back in (with a US military guarantee that they won’t have their assets stolen again), that can actually have a noticeable impact on the cost of goods in the US.

    • Thanks: Achmed E. Newman
  • Anybody been following the Great Somali Daycare Scam story coming out of Minneapolis? And soon, no doubt, to be coming out of Columbus, Lewiston, and Seattle too.

    I’ve been following this since it first came up, when it was called the biggest scam ever perpetrated against the American people. I doubt that’s the case. My guess is that Somalis are just following a script, and that most immigrant and minority ethnic groups are running major scams. Some groups have the government do the robbing for them, while others are acting on their own. The result is the same. But I doubt that the Somali crooks are the worst. Other groups are shielded, and their criminality denied, ignored, or folded into generic white crimes.

    It goes without saying that Jewish crimes for Israel are far larger and much more destructive than anything that a few Somalis have done to the morons in Maine and Minnesota. Madoff alone was probably worse. I also doubt that the Somalis have caused more harm than the Latin cartels and whatever scams have been running in those immigrant communities for many decades. I can only imagine what the Hindus are up to.

    Somalis aren’t unique. Everyone is coming to the West trying to steal a piece of the pie or pick over the carcass, and our rulers have opened the doors and offered excuses and encouragement.

    • Agree: Dmon, YetAnotherAnon
    • Replies: @vinteuil
    @OilcanFloyd


    It goes without saying that Jewish crimes for Israel are far larger and much more destructive than anything that a few Somalis have done to the morons in Maine and Minnesota.
     
    Eh, it's an arguable position.

    But I defy you to name a single Somali who has ever contributed anything whatsover to the good of America & Americans.

    They need to go.

    On the other hand, I could spend all day naming Jews who have contributed greatly to the good of America & Americans - starting with RKU himself.

    Replies: @OilcanFloyd

  • Here's a new Open Thread for everyone. For those interested, here are my more recent articles: American Pravda: Twelve Unknown Books and Their Suppressed Racial Truths Ron Unz • The Unz Review • November 17, 2025 • 17,600 Words Fact-Checking the Remarkable Revelations of Three Dozen Unknown Books Ron Unz • The Unz Review •...
  • @Buzz Mohawk
    @Dmon

    I have always wanted to cook a turducken.

    Someday I will. I used to think they were impossible, just mythological, but now I know I can someday cook one.

    Thanks!

    Merry Christmas, BTW!

    Replies: @Dmon

    And Merry Christmas to you and yours. As Buffalo Joe used to say, stay safe.

    • LOL: kaganovitch
    • Replies: @Buzz Mohawk
    @Dmon

    Love it. I think that's Far Side. Love it. Thanks, and Merry Christmas!

  • @kaganovitch
    @Jenner Ickham Errican


    When presented, will the crab legs be sticking out of the goose body for maximum gourmand horror LOL?
     
    As Buzz suggested the Goose is for Christmas Eve, the crab legs maybe for Christmas day, it's unlikely that he is contemplating Goosenstein.

    Replies: @Dmon, @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Buzz is kind of close to Canada though.

    https://www.echelonfoods.com/collections/turduckens

    “Our full turduckens are boneless, skinless duck and chicken breasts layered between Italian or chicken apple sausage stuffing into a whole turkey (which is also deboned except for the wings and drumsticks).

    Our Bacon Wrapped Turducken Roasts are a slight variation of our full bird for when you want all the flavour, but absolutely no bones. Duck and chicken breasts are wrapped up with Italian sausage stuffing into de-boned turkey thigh meat. All of this is wrapped in bacon. The result is a totally boneless turducken feast.”

    • Replies: @Buzz Mohawk
    @Dmon

    I have always wanted to cook a turducken.

    Someday I will. I used to think they were impossible, just mythological, but now I know I can someday cook one.

    Thanks!

    Merry Christmas, BTW!

    Replies: @Dmon

    , @kaganovitch
    @Dmon


    Buzz is kind of close to Canada though.
     
    Dmonyhan's theory of the Canadian Border, as it were! As it happens, turducken is very much an American invention generally credited to the late Paul Prudhomme (with some caviling as to priority) but definitely American.

    Replies: @Buzz Mohawk

  • @Curle
    @Dmon

    I saw your post. Looked up the story and sent it to the son of a friend who works in the bldg adjacent to where the attack occurred. Neither the son or the friend had heard of the attack. Both live in Seattle where it isn’t in the ‘news’.

    Replies: @Dmon

    If you google the perps name (Fale Pea), google ignores it and gives you results for Fake Pee. No joke. If you use his middle name in the search, it gives you results, but there’s nothing about it in any standard MSM source.

    BTW – there are a hell of a lot of synthetic urine (fake pee) products out there. Can’t people just lay off the weed for a couple of days before the drug test?

  • @kaganovitch
    @Dmon


    Yes, Fale Pea looks exactly like what you were expecting.
     
    A Haven Monahan lookalike, eh?

    Replies: @Dmon

    When “Law and Order” does the episode on this one, he will be portrayed by an AI-generated Dolph Lundgren. The victim will be played by the 5’2″ black chick from the live-action version of “The Little Mermaid”, except instead of being blinded, she will kick his ass.

    • LOL: kaganovitch
  • Gotta go to the UK to find any news about this.
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15403767/Seatte-woman-attacked-wooden-plank-Jeanette-Marken-Fale-Pea.html

    An elderly woman was savagely attacked in broad daylight by a man wielding a wooden board with nails in it.
    Jeanette Marken, 75, was left permanently blinded in her right eye after being hit in the face with the makeshift weapon in Seattle, allegedly at the hands of repeat offender Fale Vaigalepa Pea, 42.

    Yes, Fale Pea looks exactly like what you were expecting.

    • Replies: @kaganovitch
    @Dmon


    Yes, Fale Pea looks exactly like what you were expecting.
     
    A Haven Monahan lookalike, eh?

    Replies: @Dmon

    , @YetAnotherAnon
    @Dmon

    Than name is Pacific Islands or even Maori. Apparently a Samoan.

    From here

    https://www.reddit.com/r/SeattleWA/comments/1pjdczm/my_75_year_old_mom_was_attacked_while_waiting_to/

    , @Curle
    @Dmon

    I saw your post. Looked up the story and sent it to the son of a friend who works in the bldg adjacent to where the attack occurred. Neither the son or the friend had heard of the attack. Both live in Seattle where it isn’t in the ‘news’.

    Replies: @Dmon

  • Bad news on the front of White guys bringing punitive lawsuits for suffering damages through DEI. It appeared to be an open and shut case for Klein.

    https://www.thecollegefix.com/judge-rules-against-ucla-prof-suspended-after-refusing-lenient-grading-for-black-students/

    A judge has issued a tentative decision against a professor who sued UCLA after he was suspended in the wake of the George Floyd-Black Lives Matter riots after refusing a request to grade black students leniently.
    Superior Court Judge H. Jay Ford’s recent ruling against UCLA accounting lecturer Gordon Klein sides with UCLA on all three causes of action: breach of contract, false light, and negligent interference with prospective earnings.
    Klein’s legal team has filed an appeal, and Judge Ford is scheduled to consider that request, or enter a decision finalizing his tentative ruling, at a hearing scheduled for Jan. 9.

    Judge Ford is originally a Jerry Brown appointee in 2013, and was automatically re-elected (due to no opposition) in 2020 to the Santa Monica Superior Court District. There are alot of those types still out there.

  • @J.Ross
    @Mike Tre

    Judge's "Tales from the Tour Bus," which is probably the funniest and best thing he ever did, originated from a tortured comparison intended to make gangster rappers look relatively good (Johnny Paycheck, an almost unknown country artist who shot a guy as part of an argument).

    Replies: @Mike Tre, @Dmon

    “Johnny Paycheck, an almost unknown country artist”

    Au contraire. Who hasn’t heard this?

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @Dmon

    It was news to me.

  • @Achmed E. Newman
    @Mr. Anon

    Thanks for those details, Mr. Anon. One of which was obvious to me is that it doesn't affect current H1B visa holders. Could he tack on a YUGE change-of-status fee? I don't know, but he's got people that are trying to gum up the PRP works.

    However, it seems you're trying to find stuff to show, what exactly, that he's not up on all the details? Sure, more could be done, but this was a good step, one that NO other guy that could possibly hold that office would do.


    No qualified U.S. worker is available for the position,
     
    This business, including very tailored ads, is one that's been around at least 30 years. I personally have been excluded from a job with this method. (They already had a guy, but the description was right up my alley. I just happened to have met the guy later on - a Chinese import.)

    Worse than that is that (just saw a ZH article and NO commenter caught it) H1B visa "cap" business. Supposedly there's a cap with a 65,000 YEARLY limit plus 20,000 more with grad degrees. It's a joke - then there is a lottery - akin to a high-tech Charlestown Enslaved Market - in which as many as 3/4 million lottery I.D.s are allowed. It's generally been 1/4 to 1/3 million yearly.

    Yes, I know about this pretty specifically, Mr. Anon. I won't naysay about it, because it's still a big step in the right direction. There have been more.

    BTW, I agree with your other comment. Trump could do more to rally Americans by relating all the info about these scams. However, he's not a details guy - that's the problem.

    Replies: @Dmon

    At risk of sounding like a total geek, I am going to make a baseball analogy (this is, after all, sort of an iSteve legacy comment thread). In the late 1970’s, the NY Mets were an absolutely terrible team, coming in last or near last on a regular basis (they had traded Tom Seaver, their Miracle Mets days were well behind them, and the mid-’80s powerhouse was nowhere in sight yet – if Germ Theory were still here, he would back me up on this). Far and away, the Mets best player was their center fielder, a fellow named Lee Mazzilli. Mazzilli had been touted as a superstar when he first came up. But Shea Stadium was a terrible hitters park, which depressed his power stats, and maybe he didn’t quite throw as well as you’d like your center fielder to. But still, he was a good, all-star quality player, hit .280-.300, medium range power, and he was still very young, in his early 20’s so plenty of time to develop. The rest of the team was godawful, with sub-replacement level players sprinkled all over the field. As often happens in sports and in life, the best player, being the most visible, gets an inordinate share of the blame for the team’s shortcomings. Babe Ruth probably couldn’t have dragged those Mets to a pennant, and Mazzilli was sure as hell no Babe Ruth, so the fans and the team management turned on him. They started shifting him around to other positions, he had an off year with the bat, and they traded him. Much to their surprise, even without him, the team still kept coming in last, because the other 7 guys on the field all still stunk.

    I look at Trump as sort of a Lee Mazzilli. He’s not George Washington, he can’t single-handedly save the country, even though he might talk like he can. But if you consider him as part of “our” team (whatever you call it – White, historic American, conservative, whatever), he is nowhere near the biggest problem we have. The political landscape is like the late ’70s Mets – everywhere you look, there are people who are absolutely terrible. Trump is one of the few who’s doing anything at all that’s favorable. The current situation has been building for about 150 years, and nobody (let alone Trump) is going to unwind it all overnight (or possibly ever, barring total collapse). In fact, his most lasting achievement is possibly going to be just shining light on everything and revealing the other side for the lying, cheating sacks of sh!t that they are.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    @Dmon

    No, that's not geeky at all, Dmon. I have a soft spot for baseball, and that was a good way to make your point about Trump anyway. I agree with all, and as for this:


    In fact, his most lasting achievement is possibly going to be just shining light on everything and revealing the other side for the lying, cheating sacks of sh!t that they are.
     
    Peter Brimelow and maybe other VDare writers called Trump "a Wrecking Ball" last time around. I think he's better than that now. He's shining the light everywhere. It's great!

    Take your pick, Collective Soul or Newsboys:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_m0bI82Rz_k

    .

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=givCI1M9Rh0

    Replies: @Corvinus, @Jenner Ickham Errican

  • @Jim Don Bob
    Here is Jeremy Carl's rejoinder to Jacob Savage's recent discovery that white guys like him are at the bottom of the totem pole. JS is about 40 years too late, but, hey, who cares about all the cops and firemen who got passed over for promotion ny lower scoring POCs? Or Army guys who didn't get promoted so Colin Powell could be JCS chairman? What's important is that JS can't get a job in Hollywood, yet he is still on the libtard band wagon.

    https://jeremycarl.substack.com/p/why-the-lost-generation-is-a-lost

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman, @Dmon

    Savage is a (((fellow white))) guy. He’s upset that jews are now counted as White. He didn’t give a crap about White guys getting stomped on until DEI came for the jobs that jews owned. Now he’s just trying to round up some chumps to fight for him. Once Hollywood is a jewish sinecure again, screw the soldiers and the firemen and the truck drivers and the civil engineers.

    https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/the-vanishing

    The erasure of Jews from American life
    BY JACOB SAVAGE
    Suddenly, everywhere you look, the Jews are disappearing.

    You feel it like a slow moving pressure system, an anxiety of exclusion and downward mobility. Maybe you first noticed it at your workplace. Or maybe it hit when you or your children applied to college or graduate school. It could have been something as simple as opening up the Netflix splash page. It’s gauche to count but you can’t help yourself: In academia, Hollywood, Washington, even in New York City—anywhere American Jews once made their mark—our influence is in steep decline.

  • @Jim Don Bob
    @Dmon

    Here is an article about how the Dutch ended up with EUV lithography from the excellent Construction Physics Substack:

    https://www.construction-physics.com/p/how-asml-got-euv

    Replies: @Dmon, @YetAnotherAnon, @YetAnotherAnon

    Thanks – very interesting article.

  • @Brutusale
    @Currdog73


    Granted the meskins eat beef parts that us white boys normally don’t...
     
    Well, not that most people know about.

    You worked in the meatpacking industry, right? Like me, you know how the sausage is made.

    "USDA Sausage Operations
    Meat and Poultry Components Used in Sausage Preparation Sausage is usually made with fresh or frozen meat or poultry. Some sausage product’s standard of identity allows the use of meat byproducts, poultry byproducts, mechanically separated species or kind, and cured meat products, such bacon and cured trimmings. Let’s review some definitions for meat and poultry components that may appear in the standard of identity for a sausage. Meat is muscle tissue from any cattle, sheep, swine, goat, or equine animal that is skeletal or that is found in the tongue, diaphragm, heart, or esophagus, with or without the accompanying and overlaying fat. It includes portions of bone, skin, sinew (tendon), nerve, and blood vessels normally accompanying the muscle tissue that are not separated from the muscle in the dressing procedure (9 CFR 301.2). It does not include the muscle found in the lips, snouts, or ears. For cooked sausage products, the definition of meat differs slightly from the definition of meat given in §301.2 of the regulations. For example, tongues, hearts, and weasands are not considered meat but are meat byproducts. Meat byproducts may be used in the preparation of some sausage products. They must be listed in the ingredient statement of sausage. This term means any part derived from cattle, sheep, swine, goats, or equine animals, other than meat, that can be used as human food (9 CFR 301.2). For hotdogs/franks/wieners, etc. listed in 9 CFR 319.180(g), meat byproducts include: pork stomachs and snouts; beef, veal, lamb, or goat tripe; beef, veal, lamb, goat, or pork hearts, tongues, fat, lips, weasands, and spleens; and partially defatted pork fatty tissue (PDPFT), or partially defatted beef fatty tissue (PDBFT). While there are many more types of byproducts, these are specifically permitted in the §319.180 regulated products. Other byproducts, such as organ meats (livers, kidneys, etc.), glands (e.g., lymph glands), skin, and fat may be used in sausages (other than §319.180 products) when byproducts are permitted. Poultry Meat is deboned chicken or turkey meat, or both, without skin or added fat (kidneys and sex glands have been removed) (9 CFR 319.180(g)). Further Processing and Labeling Inspection Course 6 Sausage Operations 3/9/2020 Poultry includes edible parts such as skin and fat when not in excess of their natural proportions, including chicken meat (9 CFR 381.118(b)). Poultry byproducts includes skin, fat, and giblets (gizzard, heart, and liver) (9 CFR 381.1). Mechanically Separated (Species, MSS or Kind of Poultry, MSKP) Product is a finely comminuted product resulting from the mechanical separation and removal of most of the bone and other tissue from attached skeletal muscle of livestock or poultry carcasses and parts of carcasses. These products must meet the requirement of 9 CFR 319.5 or 381.173."

    Left off the list are pizzles, which were ON the list at all three meat packers I did business with.

    Don't even get me started on "mechanically separated"!

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Dmon, @Almost Missouri, @Currdog73, @Pericles, @EdwardM

    • Replies: @A123
    @Dmon

    Here is some humor for the season.

     
    https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjZmzNs1-DV_pAk_TzmPBqLj9CzSfBvDl8zUJRZlulIy9PQlHe9ogrp6yhgHaZZa8OArIbXr0ualI-jLrWaPvo9X46PUvfKLk8LUAVItUCCtCDNjSe_bPuKWoscrxTDKcNWtiDLtsL6OW6zDfYpRc72LfCrpJxWmt9JvfULk-xP4XCcy_Tu48eLaQu6I20j/s640/90miles0c3c3f870f68be1084eb287cedeed3ce_e29dde02_640.jpg
     

    🎄 MERRY CHRISTMAS 🎄

    Replies: @J.Ross, @songbird

  • @YetAnotherAnon
    @Jim Don Bob

    "China will not be able to do that without the EUV machines from ASML."

    How long do you think it'll take them to build their own? Even if in the meantime ASML have advanced even further?

    In any event they'll also need ultra pure silicon, a Japanese speciality. The smaller the chip, the more pure the silicon needed.

    https://waferpro.com/silicon-wafer-material-from-sand-to-semiconductors/


    The largest wafer manufacturers play a crucial role in the semiconductor supply chain - delivering billions of wafers per year to chipmakers globally. The leaders include:

    WaferPro - Leading silicon wafer material supplier in the US. Operates plants in US and Japan.
    Shin-Etsu - Japanese firm and the #1 supplier with around 30% global silicon wafer market share. Key locations include Japan, Taiwan, UK and USA.
    SUMCO - Also Japanese. Possesses 19% market share. Has factories in Japan, USA and Singapore.
    GlobalWafers - GlobalWafers is based in Taiwan, with about 18% market share. Manufactures in Taiwan, China, Japan, Korea, Malaysia and USA.
    SK siltron - South Korean company with 8% market share. Operates plants in Korea, USA and China.
    Sino-American Silicon (SAS) - Another big Taiwan player, with around 7% market share. Manufactures wafers in Taiwan and China.
     

    Replies: @Dmon

    “China will not be able to do that without the EUV machines from ASML.”

    How long do you think it’ll take them to build their own? Even if in the meantime ASML have advanced even further?

    Might be a little harder than it looks. If it was amenable to their usual approaches of espionage and patent infringement, they’d have one by now.

    https://asiatimes.com/2025/10/china-reportedly-caught-reverse-engineering-asmls-duv-lithography/

    A Chinese firm reportedly has sought technical support from ASML, the world’s largest chipmaking equipment supplier, after it failed to reassemble a deep-ultraviolet (DUV) lithography machine following an internal teardown for alleged reverse engineering.

    “An ASML DUV machine that China has used to make their chips recently broke down. They called the Dutch company for help repairing it,” Brandon Weichert, a senior national security editor at The National Interest, says in a X post. “ASML sent some techs. They discovered that the Chinese broke the machine when they disassembled it and tried to put it back together.”

    “The reason Chinese technicians took apart their older ASML DUV system is simple. They are trying to find a way around US sanctions on the newest machines,” Weichert says. “By taking apart the older model and attempting to rebuild it, they hope to learn how to produce their own advanced versions. But it seems they still can’t figure it out.”

    • Agree: Jim Don Bob
    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @Dmon

    The Dutch really are shockingly smart. Their early history is figuring out how to live in unlivable places (the town on stilts), and their modern history is doing absolute cutting edge high tech stuff like cracking an iPhone or making unmakable parts, and they're disproportionately important to agriculture despite being a tiny country. And they're generally very good looking.

    Replies: @Almost Missouri, @Curle

    , @Jim Don Bob
    @Dmon

    Here is an article about how the Dutch ended up with EUV lithography from the excellent Construction Physics Substack:

    https://www.construction-physics.com/p/how-asml-got-euv

    Replies: @Dmon, @YetAnotherAnon, @YetAnotherAnon

  • @Buzz Mohawk
    @Dmon

    The very fact that "our" only choice was, cough, Donald Fucking Trump is all I need to know to continue not taking life seriously.

    Of all the people in my beautiful, wide, America, Donald Fucking Trump became my choice. What a fucking joke.

    And I voted for him.

    Think.

    Think about how absurd that is.

    Why, oh why, Dear God, can't we here in this "Greatest Nation on Earth" have some other choice? Some other "leader" (cough, caugh, spit, vomit!) who actually isn't a fucking freak, is not a God damned clown? Please. Why was Donny our only choice among a clown show of clowns who all cowtowed to the same bullshit?

    All I can conclude is that We Do Not Have A Choice!

    It's obvious.

    Now, you can continue on bantering about management this and politics that. It's all bull-fucking-shit.

    BTW, I notice a great and wonderful trend in the blogosphere of referring to all shit as "fedslop." Yes. All the garbage fed to all of us is "fedslop." Just as I first described mass-produced, fast, convenience food as slop. It's all fucking slop.


    https://thecounter.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/animal-feed-farmers-diet-covid-19-coronavirus-may-2020.jpg
    Pigs ("citizens") eating slop

    Oh, but I'm obsessed with food. Fuck you.

    Replies: @Dmon, @epebble

    “Oh, but I’m obsessed with food. Fuck you.”

    What were we talking about again?

    • Replies: @Buzz Mohawk
    @Dmon

    LOL. I'm not sure, but the "fuck you" was not aimed at you, but at someone else here who implied that I was obsessed with food. Someone I also actually admire and enjoy reading! So, it's all good! My comment was intended for the general readership, as all of mine are, simply because they are all open for all readership.

    Blah, blah, blah.

    And so it goes...

    Hey, we just bought a Christmas Goose! Yep, we picked up today a 12 pound, frozen goose at Whole Foods. Organic and all that shit! My wife wants to cook it for our Christmas dinner.

    I actually had to detour around in the woods after another shopping trip and drive over in another direction to another town to get the goose. Beautiful drive though.

    Replies: @J.Ross

  • @Mark G.
    @Dmon

    "Pat was probably the last chance for historic America."

    The Republican party came to a fork in the road in the nineties and made a wrong choice on which path to take. I was unhappy when I voted for Pat Buchanan and he lost in the 1992 Republican primaries but became more optimistic with the 1994 Republican takeover of Congress. It's leader, Newt Gingrich, turned out to be a technophile who recommended people read books by liberals like Alvin Toffler.

    These Gingrich technophiles combined together with hawkish neocons eager for foreign wars and supply siders who wanted to cut taxes but not spending and ended up giving us the Bush, McCain and Romney Republican party. They and the Democrats seemed to be increasingly the same. Ron Paul and more recently Donald Trump voters largely wanted a anti-establishment populist Republican party instead.

    Steve Sailer largely endorsed Buchananism in his earlier years by complaining about the Republican party adopting "invade the world, invite the world, in hock to the world" as its policy. Steve was also willing to acknowledge racial differences when it came to average IQ or proclivity towards crime, a commonly accepted belief among earlier Republicans. Steve in his old age, though, has moved towards modern day establishment Republican beliefs. I preferred the old Steve.

    Replies: @Dmon, @Almost Missouri

    came to a fork in the road in the nineties and made a wrong choice on which path to take.

    It wasn’t just the Republican party, or even primarily the Republican party, it was the whole country, and the Democrats contributed at least as much.

    In the 1990s the Cold War ended, the Warsaw Pact and then the Soviet Union collapsed. NATO/the West/America, as the sole global shot-caller, had an epic, once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to reforge the global order to contend with the imminent rise of the once-and-future superpower: China.

    The obvious and easy move, which was practically begging to happen, was to put aside the old animosities, welcome the former Soviet states into the Western fold, and unite all the implicitly white countries into a new coalition of freedom and prosperity. The high-trust, high-culture, liberal-democratic polities of the West would preside over abundant land, cheap energy, world-defining science and technology, and the material increase and bourgeois culture that everyone envies. This would have been the best Western configuration when it had to face the Chinese giant’s configuration of huge population, high human capital, and low labor costs under effective central control: a billion centrally-organized Han versus a coalition of half billion whites with the world’s preeminent land, energy, and resource portfolio.

    Instead, the US sponsored oligarchs’ minions wildly looting Russia under the guise of helping transition it to market economy, a double-betrayal. The US and NATO followed this up by reneging on the assurances of NATO quiescence in exchange for Russian military retrenchment further to the East, and sharpened NATO into an anti-Russia conspiracy, now making actual kinetic war on the Russian homeland itself.

    Needless to say, this has broken the potential white alliance and driven the second most powerful member into the arms of the Chinese rival, giving the China pole the edge over the Western pole. Just an epic, unforgiveable blunder.

    This mostly happened under the Democrat Clinton regime, with the most dramatic act in the recent Biden regime. The Repub GWB admin was a bit of a thaw by comparison.

    The deindustrialization of the US and the technology transfer to China—and the attendant effects on the American industrial class—were likewise Clinton-era spawn.

    • Thanks: Mark G.
    • Replies: @Hypnotoad666
    @Almost Missouri


    The obvious and easy move, which was practically begging to happen, was to put aside the old animosities, welcome the former Soviet states into the Western fold
     
    100% accurate. But our traitorous Neocon Brain Trust had a better idea. Why not do a "reverse Nixon" by forcing Russia to join forces with China in an anti-American alliance that also includes basically the whole non-Western half of the world? How could that go wrong?

    But hey, why align with the world's largest country with the largest land army, largest store of natural resources, and largest nuclear arsenal when we can just do the bidding of a shitty little country in the Middle East. For whatever reason, every suicidal action by the U.S. Foreign Policy Blob somehow has the fingerprints of that shitty little country and its domestic proxies all over it.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Mr. Anon

    , @vinteuil
    @Almost Missouri

    Great summary.

    Things looked so hopeful, when the wall came down. But then, instead of peace & reconciliation with the long suffering Russian people, we got a bunch of evil foreign creeps like Zbigniew Brzezinski, pushing their ancestral resentments at the expense of the American people, running our foreign policy.

  • @Achmed E. Newman
    @Dmon

    Hello, Dmon. Ross Perot was a smarter and calmer Donald Trump. There's more to his story though. I thought he was a flake when he dropped out of the election campaign in the Summer of '92 due to "something something, messing with his daughter's wedding". I didn't know any better then, but later I realized there were probably a whole lot of Deep State threats involved in Perot's actions that summer. I regret - not like my one vote would have mattered - that I didn't vote for him when he came back into the campaign. I voted "L", of course.

    3rd parties do have a hard time, mainly because things aren't as factional geographically as in '24 (one of the OTHER '24's) when a downright Communist, Robert LaFollette, won his State of Wisconsin against the 2 very decent men, yes, the D John W. Davis and the R Silent Cal - see A more intelligent and civil '24 Presidential election. Ross Perot won 19% of the popular vote in 1992 but got no electoral votes. That was the most 3rd-party votes received since Teddy Roosevelt in 1912.

    Replies: @Corvinus, @Dmon

    “Ross Perot was a smarter and calmer Donald Trump.”

    America was a smarter, calmer country in 1992. That must have been a busy summer for the professional dirty tricksters. I imagine the old-line Bush deep staters were desperately trying to get Perot out of the race, whereas the up-and-coming Bill Ayers style ones and the Arkansas Mafia were trying to keep him in (knowing he would probably siphon off mostly Bush votes). Perot won alot of popular votes, but in my lifetime, far and away the most successful 3rd party candidate (as far as electoral votes), as well as the most faithful to the Constitution was George Wallace in ’68. Naturally, he got lots of bad press, and eventually (like all enemies of the left who don’t succumb to the character assassination) got shot.

    The Perot/Trump comparison always reminds me of a conversation a co-worker and I had many years ago. One of our buddies had been promoted to management, and was flailing badly (alienating people through being indecisive, failing to protect his workers from unreasonable management whims, etc.etc). He was a nice guy, and before becoming a manager, everybody liked him. What we concluded was that to be successful in any sort of management or executive position, you had to have the capacity to be an asshole when necessary – you will always encounter situations where one side or another is dissatisfied with your decision, and you have to be willing to piss people off. Our buddy simply had no asshole side to his personality. When an asshole acts like an asshole, people say, “What a strong leader”. When a nice guy acts like an asshole, people say, “What an asshole”.* Trump is a natural asshole.

    *This dictum does not apply to Colitis. He is neither a nice guy or a strong leader – just an asshole.

    • Replies: @Buzz Mohawk
    @Dmon

    The very fact that "our" only choice was, cough, Donald Fucking Trump is all I need to know to continue not taking life seriously.

    Of all the people in my beautiful, wide, America, Donald Fucking Trump became my choice. What a fucking joke.

    And I voted for him.

    Think.

    Think about how absurd that is.

    Why, oh why, Dear God, can't we here in this "Greatest Nation on Earth" have some other choice? Some other "leader" (cough, caugh, spit, vomit!) who actually isn't a fucking freak, is not a God damned clown? Please. Why was Donny our only choice among a clown show of clowns who all cowtowed to the same bullshit?

    All I can conclude is that We Do Not Have A Choice!

    It's obvious.

    Now, you can continue on bantering about management this and politics that. It's all bull-fucking-shit.

    BTW, I notice a great and wonderful trend in the blogosphere of referring to all shit as "fedslop." Yes. All the garbage fed to all of us is "fedslop." Just as I first described mass-produced, fast, convenience food as slop. It's all fucking slop.


    https://thecounter.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/animal-feed-farmers-diet-covid-19-coronavirus-may-2020.jpg
    Pigs ("citizens") eating slop

    Oh, but I'm obsessed with food. Fuck you.

    Replies: @Dmon, @epebble

    , @Achmed E. Newman
    @Dmon

    In 1968, George Wallace won 5 States, giving him ~8 1/2% of the Electoral Votes, and he won 13 1/2% of the Popular Vote. The South wasn't solid for him, but he won the Deep South, Louisiana east through Georgia, plus Arkansas.

    The country was more geographically diverse then. 20 years earlier, Strom Thurmond, of his Dixiecrat/State's Rights Party won only 2 1/2% of the Popular Vote but got 39 EVs, about 7.5% of them. He got neither Arkansas nor Georgia (as Wallace won), but he got S. Carolina because he was from there and then one elector from Tennessee.

    I want to write a post on this... then again, I want to write on a lot of stuff..

  • @Mark G.
    @Dmon

    "Pat was probably the last chance for historic America."

    The Republican party came to a fork in the road in the nineties and made a wrong choice on which path to take. I was unhappy when I voted for Pat Buchanan and he lost in the 1992 Republican primaries but became more optimistic with the 1994 Republican takeover of Congress. It's leader, Newt Gingrich, turned out to be a technophile who recommended people read books by liberals like Alvin Toffler.

    These Gingrich technophiles combined together with hawkish neocons eager for foreign wars and supply siders who wanted to cut taxes but not spending and ended up giving us the Bush, McCain and Romney Republican party. They and the Democrats seemed to be increasingly the same. Ron Paul and more recently Donald Trump voters largely wanted a anti-establishment populist Republican party instead.

    Steve Sailer largely endorsed Buchananism in his earlier years by complaining about the Republican party adopting "invade the world, invite the world, in hock to the world" as its policy. Steve was also willing to acknowledge racial differences when it came to average IQ or proclivity towards crime, a commonly accepted belief among earlier Republicans. Steve in his old age, though, has moved towards modern day establishment Republican beliefs. I preferred the old Steve.

    Replies: @Dmon, @Almost Missouri

    I was for Pat in ’92. Failing that, I preferred Perot, who I believe would have been much better than either of the other choices. The uniparty used the same tactics against Perot that they later used against Trump – trying to squelch what he said, and going straight to defamation, character assassination and dirty tricks. It worked with Perot, because he was not the narcissistic sonofabitch that Trump is, so he tried to explain himself (which is always the wrong thing to do), plus 3rd parties don’t really stand a chance in the American system.
    Gingrich always talked a good game, but the Contract With America congress that came in in ’94 almost immediately turned around and approved a big-time pork barrel budget. The Neo-Cons were always obviously jewish opportunists whose goal was to get US foreign policy focused entirely on the aggrandizement of Israel and figured the Republican party, with it’s preponderant Evangelical faction was the most likely avenue. Around about 1996, I read “Lost Rights” by James Bovard, which documented what had been apparent for a while – that America was continuously receding from being a free country. I didn’t get too excited about the 2000 election contretemps, because as near as I could tell, both guys were going to do about the same thing. After 9-11 (or more likely, before 9-11), both parties abdicated completely to the deep state. With two exceptions, modern US politics is essentially looting the silverware from the Titanic, with the only differences between parties being how the loot is distributed. One exception was Obama – he was of course a tool of the deep state crime syndicate, but he also derived personal satisfaction from destroying the country. The other exception is Trump. He certainly is not lacking for faults, but he is the only president in a long time who has any regard for the America he grew up in.
    BTW – speaking of talking a good game, the whole modern paradigm of offshoring manufacturing jobs, importing foreigners for service jobs, and financing the welfare state through debt started with Reagan. Maybe he just had no choice – they stuck the ultimate deepstater George H.W. in there to keep an eye on him, and took ruthless advantage of his impending senility.

    • LOL: Corvinus
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    @Dmon

    Hello, Dmon. Ross Perot was a smarter and calmer Donald Trump. There's more to his story though. I thought he was a flake when he dropped out of the election campaign in the Summer of '92 due to "something something, messing with his daughter's wedding". I didn't know any better then, but later I realized there were probably a whole lot of Deep State threats involved in Perot's actions that summer. I regret - not like my one vote would have mattered - that I didn't vote for him when he came back into the campaign. I voted "L", of course.

    3rd parties do have a hard time, mainly because things aren't as factional geographically as in '24 (one of the OTHER '24's) when a downright Communist, Robert LaFollette, won his State of Wisconsin against the 2 very decent men, yes, the D John W. Davis and the R Silent Cal - see A more intelligent and civil '24 Presidential election. Ross Perot won 19% of the popular vote in 1992 but got no electoral votes. That was the most 3rd-party votes received since Teddy Roosevelt in 1912.

    Replies: @Corvinus, @Dmon

  • @Mark G.
    @Jim Don Bob

    "his Ali G schtick was funny for about 5 minutes"

    When he interviewed Pat Buchanan, Pat almost immediately realized it was a put on and played along with the joke. Both Cohen and Buchanan said later they enjoyed themselves and thought it was all pretty funny.

    Pat was polite and charming at a personal level. While he was often critical of Israel, he was not personally hateful towards Jews. Ron Paul was much like this too. The MAGA movement had as its predecessors Buchanan's pitchfork brigade and Paul's tea party movement.

    Donald Trump can be polite and charming but also sometimes is quite nasty and vicious, as shown by his attacks on Thomas Massie and Marjorie Taylor Greene. The best current day representative of the anti-establishment populist movement started by Buchanan and Paul would probably be Tucker Carlson rather than Trump.

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman, @Curle, @OilcanFloyd, @Mr. Anon, @Dmon

    Pat was probably the last chance for historic America, but prophets are seldom honored in their own time and country.

    • Thanks: Sam Hildebrand, Mark G.
    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @Dmon

    "Pat was probably the last chance for historic America."

    The Republican party came to a fork in the road in the nineties and made a wrong choice on which path to take. I was unhappy when I voted for Pat Buchanan and he lost in the 1992 Republican primaries but became more optimistic with the 1994 Republican takeover of Congress. It's leader, Newt Gingrich, turned out to be a technophile who recommended people read books by liberals like Alvin Toffler.

    These Gingrich technophiles combined together with hawkish neocons eager for foreign wars and supply siders who wanted to cut taxes but not spending and ended up giving us the Bush, McCain and Romney Republican party. They and the Democrats seemed to be increasingly the same. Ron Paul and more recently Donald Trump voters largely wanted a anti-establishment populist Republican party instead.

    Steve Sailer largely endorsed Buchananism in his earlier years by complaining about the Republican party adopting "invade the world, invite the world, in hock to the world" as its policy. Steve was also willing to acknowledge racial differences when it came to average IQ or proclivity towards crime, a commonly accepted belief among earlier Republicans. Steve in his old age, though, has moved towards modern day establishment Republican beliefs. I preferred the old Steve.

    Replies: @Dmon, @Almost Missouri

  • @YetAnotherAnon
    @Dmon

    Don't forget the fake parts being fitted !

    https://archive.ph/OpVFs


    This spring, engineers at TAP Air Portugal’s maintenance subsidiary huddled around an aircraft engine that had come in for repair. The exposed CFM56 turbine looked like just another routine job for a shop that handles more than 100 engines a year. Only this time, there was cause for alarm.

    Workers noticed that a replacement part, a damper to reduce vibration, showed signs of wear, when the accompanying paperwork identified the component as fresh from the production line. On June 21, TAP pointed out the discrepancy to Safran SA, the French aerospace company that makes CFM engines together with General Electric Co.

    Safran quickly determined that the paperwork had been forged. The signature wasn’t that of a company employee, and the reference and purchase order numbers on the part also didn’t add up.

    To date, Safran and GE have uncovered more than 90 other certificates that had similarly been falsified, all linked to the same parts distributor in London: AOG Technics Ltd., a little-known outfit started eight years ago by a young entrepreneur named Jose Alejandro Zamora Yrala.
     

    https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/international/2025/12/02/849473.htm

    The director of a company at the center of a probe into the sale of counterfeit plane parts pleaded guilty to a charge of fraudulent trading.

    AOG Technics Ltd.’s director, Jose Alejandro Zamora Yrala, appeared at Southwark Crown Court on Monday wearing a blue suit and tie, speaking only to confirm his name and enter his plea. He was charged by the Serious Fraud Office earlier this year.

    A sentencing hearing has been scheduled for February 23 2026. The fraudulent trading charge carries a maximum sentence of 10 years imprisonment.
     

    Interestingly the Companies House website declares Venezuelan Jose Alejandro Zamora Yrala to be "British".

    https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09444470/officers

    When you allow millions of people from low-trust societies into a high-trust society, you end up having to create (fifty years on, after a lot of fraud) low trust institutions. Now, company officers have to hand over passport details or similar i-d, starting pretty much now.

    Fake parts can kill.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partnair_Flight_394

    Replies: @Dmon, @kaganovitch

    When guys like Vox Day refer to everything being fake and gay, they’re probably closer to the truth than they know.

  • @Buzz Mohawk
    @Achmed E. Newman


    Both you and Buzz make commercial aviation sound more worrisome than is should be...
     
    Well I didn't mean to do that.

    If anyone loves airplanes it's me. I'm just periodically amazed at how impressive the parameters of jet airliners are, and I don't think the general dumb public appreciates what is achieved day in and day out.

    Day in and day out. Failures and disasters are extremely rare.

    And when I say "soda can," I am just describing an aluminum cylinder when I bet the general public again doesn't even know how an airliner's fuselage is built. Hell, I find soda cans amazing too.

    And jet turbines. One classmate from my hometown worked on blade design for GE. (In college, same place where I went, he double majored in engineering and fine art. Unusual but somehow appropriate.) The rotational speeds and temperatures are astounding, day in and day out without cracking, melting or flying apart.

    The equipment is great, but the thing is, as you all know, that we might start feeling a little less confident that there won't be human error. When it happens, as it did at Tenerife on the ground, well, you know, it can be kind of bad, and the chances of screw ups are getting higher for all the reasons we here know. And we also see evidence that human error might be coming into play with regard to aircraft design and/or construction (or business practices) as well. (Boeing.)

    Honestly, though, I love flying, and I don't worry about it. I'm more likely to get hit head-on by some pot smoker or phone addict on the road.

    Replies: @Dmon

    “I’m more likely to get hit head-on by some pot smoker or phone addict on the road.”

    Or maybe not. An amusing episode from the coming AIpocalypse:

    https://www.fox4news.com/news/waymo-standoff-san-francisco-goes-viral

    A trio of driverless Waymo cars involved in what’s being described as a “standoff” created a scene in San Francisco.

    Waymo officials said that while making a multi-point turn on a dead-end street, two driverless cars made “minor contact at low speed.”

    A third Waymo, traveling downhill, is unable to get through.
    Then a man comes out of his garage, dubbing the white cars stuck in the middle of the street as a “Waymo standoff.”
    “I’m just trying to get out of here,” the man said

    • Replies: @Mike Tre
    @Dmon

    "A trio of driverless Waymo cars involved in what’s being described as a “standoff” created a scene in San Francisco.

    Waymo officials said that while making a multi-point turn on a dead-end street, two driverless cars made “minor contact at low speed.”"

    There are way mo of these things than anyone wants or needs.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

    , @Buzz Mohawk
    @Dmon

    Indeed. Thank you!

    Honestly, I don't think either the powers that be, or the science fiction nerds that are now a part of the powers that be, have the wisdom to see how careless they really are being.

    I am left to agree with Achmed E. Newman that some of those people are truly evil, or at least that they have bad intentions.

    Not necessarily evil, the science fiction nerds, and I will include Elon Musk in that set, strike me as guys who grew up reading some of the same fiction my friends and I did. The difference is that they lack the common sense to discern what is human and what is abstract.

    In other words, they are stupid. High IQ and stupid, like fast sprinters who can't climb mountains and can't find their way around topo maps of said mountains. Fast but stupid. Real fucking nerds who love science fiction, a genre that most of us left behind after adolescence.

    Witness Elon Musk, for example: he wants to colonize Mars, but he has not addressed the fact that Mars has a gravity of 0.379 g, which means it is about 38% of Earth's gravity. That means that anybody who lives for a long time on Mars, or especially anybody born and reared on Mars, will find it very difficult to ever vist Earth. Martian children will be too weak to ever stand up on Earth without assistance, and God knows how their heart-lung systems will be! They will be condemned to be permanently Martian -- if that is even biologically possible for humans.

    Musk doesn't know, but his entire science fiction rocket fantasy is based on that not being an issue.

    Similarly, he doesn't address all the weaknesses and problems with electric cars as any kind of substantial substitute for our tranportation needs. He has a science fiction fantasy about vast solar facilities. He never suggests a nuclear solution, and he never, ever addresses the charging problem and the massive problem of manufacturing tons of toxic batteries, not to mention the ton of extra mass required in every vehicle.

    And so on...

  • @Mike Tre
    @Achmed E. Newman

    If you want to talk about air fare then you need to examine the union contracts of commercial airline pilots. They are outrageous. My best friend from hs is a captain for United, so I hear first hand.


    United has ~ 14,000 pilots, getting paid something like $250 - $500 per flight hour. They are guaranteed 70 flight hours per month, regardless of whether they fly or not. During Kovid, they got pull pay to sit at home. Often times, they bid for "standby," which allows them to sit at home with full pay for up to a month. They only work if they get called. Do the math. That's just the pilots; we're not even talking about the rest of the unionized workforce airlines employ. So when you wonder why your free meal and your complimentary bag of peanuts are gone, but you have to pay to check a bag, well this gives you some idea.

    And this is all for what amounts to a government run, luxury industry.

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman, @Dmon

    Don’t worry. However much they’re overpaying the crews, they’re making it up on maintenance.

    https://simpleflying.com/us-airlines-central-america-maintenance-retrofits/

    Why US Airlines Send Their Aircraft To Central America For Maintenance & Retrofits
    A new trend has emerged in the 21st century of outsourcing maintenance work to foreign countries.
    This new tactic allows the airline to save significant money on labor costs and perform the work during downtime.

    The union also gave examples of how these foreign companies operate to a lower standard, such as:

    Lack of drug and alcohol testing for employees.
    A lack of security and background checks for individuals working on aircraft.
    The absence of unannounced facility inspections by the FAA.
    Relaxed requirements for certification qualifications.

    • LOL: J.Ross
    • Replies: @Mike Tre
    @Dmon

    LOL wonderful!!!

    , @YetAnotherAnon
    @Dmon

    Don't forget the fake parts being fitted !

    https://archive.ph/OpVFs


    This spring, engineers at TAP Air Portugal’s maintenance subsidiary huddled around an aircraft engine that had come in for repair. The exposed CFM56 turbine looked like just another routine job for a shop that handles more than 100 engines a year. Only this time, there was cause for alarm.

    Workers noticed that a replacement part, a damper to reduce vibration, showed signs of wear, when the accompanying paperwork identified the component as fresh from the production line. On June 21, TAP pointed out the discrepancy to Safran SA, the French aerospace company that makes CFM engines together with General Electric Co.

    Safran quickly determined that the paperwork had been forged. The signature wasn’t that of a company employee, and the reference and purchase order numbers on the part also didn’t add up.

    To date, Safran and GE have uncovered more than 90 other certificates that had similarly been falsified, all linked to the same parts distributor in London: AOG Technics Ltd., a little-known outfit started eight years ago by a young entrepreneur named Jose Alejandro Zamora Yrala.
     

    https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/international/2025/12/02/849473.htm

    The director of a company at the center of a probe into the sale of counterfeit plane parts pleaded guilty to a charge of fraudulent trading.

    AOG Technics Ltd.’s director, Jose Alejandro Zamora Yrala, appeared at Southwark Crown Court on Monday wearing a blue suit and tie, speaking only to confirm his name and enter his plea. He was charged by the Serious Fraud Office earlier this year.

    A sentencing hearing has been scheduled for February 23 2026. The fraudulent trading charge carries a maximum sentence of 10 years imprisonment.
     

    Interestingly the Companies House website declares Venezuelan Jose Alejandro Zamora Yrala to be "British".

    https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09444470/officers

    When you allow millions of people from low-trust societies into a high-trust society, you end up having to create (fifty years on, after a lot of fraud) low trust institutions. Now, company officers have to hand over passport details or similar i-d, starting pretty much now.

    Fake parts can kill.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partnair_Flight_394

    Replies: @Dmon, @kaganovitch

  • Here’s a new Open Thread for everyone. For those interested, here are my most recent articles: American Pravda: A Dozen Unknown Books and the World War II History They Reveal Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 27, 2025 • 17,600 Words American Pravda: Six Unknown Books Against a Century of Falsehoods Ron Unz...
  • @Mike Tre
    @Dmon

    Great observations and I appreciate the reply. And sadly, Rodney, even at 75, did enough blow to outrun my big Irish ass!

    Replies: @Dmon

    I have it on good authority that the refs were in the bag for Rodney.

    • Agree: Mike Tre
  • Here's a new Open Thread for everyone. For those interested, here are my more recent articles: American Pravda: Twelve Unknown Books and Their Suppressed Racial Truths Ron Unz • The Unz Review • November 17, 2025 • 17,600 Words Fact-Checking the Remarkable Revelations of Three Dozen Unknown Books Ron Unz • The Unz Review •...
  • @kaganovitch
    @Dmon


    or other hidden gems where they might offer these traditional offal tacos
     
    "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means,"

    Replies: @Dmon

    Hey – just be glad that was a cow’s eyeball you found in your taco.

    https://letterboxd.com/film/el-pozolero/
    “Man with a talent for making the bodies disappear finds a niche in a drug cartel.”

    Yes, it was ripped from the headlines.

    https://www.vice.com/en/article/one-man-dissolved-dozens-of-bodies-and-dumped-them-in-this-mass-grave-in-mexico/#:~:text=Leer%20en%20Espa%C3%B1ol.,and%20being%20convicted%20of%20crimes.

    Eight years have passed since the day Mexican authorities detained a man named Santiago Meza López. At that time, President Felipe Calderón’s administration began referring to Meza as El Pozolero (“The Stewmaker”), a reference to the fact that he was believed to have dissolved some 300 people in caustic soda.

  • @James B. Shearer
    @Mark G.

    "We may be in a pre-revolutionary period here. You always have had rent seeking behavior in this country where the wealthy used political influence to get government policies enacted that further enriched them but it has become much worse over the last forty years, with increasing inequality of wealth as the result."

    What government policy changes made in the last 40 years are you blaming here? Lower taxes on investment income? Obamacare? Lower tariffs? Deregulation? Energy efficiency standards? DEI propaganda?

    Do realize that increasing inequality of wealth is what you expect in a stable libertarian society as talented and responsible families earn more money and save more of what they earn there by increasing their wealth faster than the wealth of families that are less talented and responsible? Do you want to raise taxes on successful people to prevent them from accumulating wealth?

    Replies: @Mark G., @William Badwhite, @Brutusale, @Alden

    What government policy changes made in the last 40 years are you blaming here?

    The cumulative effect of leaving the immigration spigot open. In each of the past 40 (more like 60) years, a policy choice of continuing to wave in hordes of foreigners was made.

    There are now more than 100mm people here that would not be here if different policy choices were made. These people compete mostly at the working and in some cases middle class level for jobs. They drive on freeways and interstates that were not designed for 350mm people. They want access to universities which they and their kin did nothing to build. They expect social security and other retirement benefits. Many live in arid regions and consume scarce water.

    Whenever immigration is debated we hear endlessly how they wanted better lives for them and their offspring. We never hear what the people who were already here were supposed get out of it. Well now we see – their country has been made worse on purpose.

    Do realize that increasing inequality of wealth is what you expect in a stable libertarian society

    There is nothing “stable” about continuing to add foreigners – many of which are totally unassimilable such as the Somali garbage – to a country that is mostly full. The frontier closed over 120 years ago. We fought and won our part of WW2 with a population less than half of today’s (about 140mm as of 1945). The last thing we needed then and the last thing we need now is MORE FOREIGNERS.

    • Thanks: deep anonymous
    • Replies: @James B. Shearer
    @William Badwhite

    "The cumulative effect of leaving the immigration spigot open. In each of the past 40 (more like 60) years, a policy choice of continuing to wave in hordes of foreigners was made."

    I would agree that this has been bad. However as you note the policy change was made 60 years ago with the Hart-Celler Act of 1965. As I understood it Mark G was complaining about policy changes made in the last 40 years. Mark G would rather not talk about immigration because he can't blame it on the Federal Reserve.

    "There is nothing “stable” about continuing to add foreigners – many of which are totally unassimilable such as the Somali garbage – to a country that is mostly full. ..."

    Even if you got rid of immigration you would expect wealth inequality to be increasing because the effects of higher savings rates are cumulative. Immigration that increases diversity also increases inequality of course.

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman

  • @Old Prude
    @Currdog73

    C-rat scrambled eggs were un-eatable. I would never touch the spiced beef after a SF buddy told me he found a cow’s eyeball in his. He might have been making it up, but I didn’t want to take the chance.

    Let’s not even discuss C-rat “coffee”.

    Replies: @Dmon

    I would never touch the spiced beef after a SF buddy told me he found a cow’s eyeball in his. He might have been making it up, but I didn’t want to take the chance.

    Now you guys are just being xenophobic. People in California will pay good money for cow’s eyeballs.

    AI Overview
    “While specific San Diego taco stands serving literal “eyeball tacos” (tacos de ojos) aren’t prominently advertised, you’ll find them at authentic Tijuana-style spots known for cabeza (beef head meat), like Tacos El Gordo (often mentioned for excellent traditional options) or other hidden gems where they might offer these traditional offal tacos alongside other cuts like cheek, tongue, and tripe. Check places focusing on Tacos de Cabeza or Tacos de Surtido (assorted meats) in areas like Barrio Logan or near the border, as these traditional items are common in authentic Mexican cuisine but less so at mainstream spots.
    Where to Look for Tacos de Cabeza (which might include eyes):
    Tacos El Gordo: Famous for authentic Tijuana style, they’re a solid bet for traditional cabeza, though eyes aren’t guaranteed; it’s worth asking.”

    Apparently, they’ve metastasized to Nevada.
    https://tacoselgordobc.com/

    • Replies: @kaganovitch
    @Dmon


    or other hidden gems where they might offer these traditional offal tacos
     
    "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means,"

    Replies: @Dmon

    , @Currdog73
    @Dmon

    Granted the meskins eat beef parts that us white boys normally don't but we're talking about what Uncle Sam gives you in c-rats that maybe are questionable as to origin.

    Replies: @Brutusale

    , @YetAnotherAnon
    @Dmon

    I remember having to dissect a cow's eyeball in biology class. We all had one to work on, presumably from a slaughterhouse. I was 13 or 14.

    Funny but I don't remember being repulsed, though I've always been squeamish faced with blood. I was in a pub where someone got stabbed, checked on him (not great), went back inside to call an ambulance and passed out immediately after making the call. It all ended well, though - the girl I was with shoved a brandy under my nose when I came round.

    Replies: @Mike Tre, @Currdog73

  • @MEH 0910
    https://www.stevesailer.net/p/is-the-nyt-becoming-realist-on-immigration

    Is the NYT Becoming Realist on Immigration?
    Yet another Times article sounds like what I was writing for VDARE 25 years ago.
    Steve Sailer
    Dec 08, 2025 ∙ Paid
     
    https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/07/us/politics/biden-immigration-trump.html
    https://archive.is/bHjBj

    How Biden Ignored Warnings and Lost Americans’ Faith in Immigration
    The Democratic president and his top advisers rejected recommendations that could have eased the border crisis that helped return Donald Trump to the White House.
    By Christopher Flavelle
    Dec. 7, 2025
     

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman

    Joe Biden and his inner circle were basically Replacement Level Democratic politicians: they weren’t very bright, but they also weren’t as crazy as many Democrats during the Great Awokening. That they badly flubbed immigration policy suggests that in 2021 virtually every elite Democrat, other than the handful of lower-ranking specialists who actually understood the realities of immigration, would have made similar mistakes for similar ideological/emotional reasons.

    Flubbed, my scrawny White ass! Steve Sailer knows better. He’s not that dumb, and not only that, he was involved with VDare for 2 decades – did he not read anybody else’s articles?

    It is NOT flubbing to make an app to let strange foreigners from all over the world make asylum claims on it from south of the border, Panama, China, Haiti, wherever, such that they are let into and around the country (through the TSA line onto airline flights) with a piece of paper that says they are to appear at a hearing in a year.

    No, Joe Biden wasn’t very bright. (Still isn’t) However, Mr. Sailer has himself believing that there are NO brighter people behind the scenes, that might for some reason want to flood the Western countries and destroy the White Middle Class. No, he’d be SHOCKED, SHOCKED. Round up the usual

    Flubbed… get the fuck outta here!

    • Thanks: deep anonymous
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    @Achmed E. Newman

    “that Latinos get more racist about immigration”

    Some do. In fact, all groups have members who feel that way. This political cartoon from the 1890s (Looking Backward) is tried and true to this day.

    https://www.posterazzi.com/immigration-cartoon-1893-nlooking-backward-american-cartoon-1893-on-european-immigrants-rapid-assimilation-dislike-of-new-poor-arrivals-poster-print-by-granger-collection-item-vargrc0117692/?srsltid=AfmBOopttd-vV5qKIElWtp-UKHgF_wOj-t3AUUusIIjLY6pCTnYMjUYx

    “and demand the opening of the borders to overwhelm white voters demographically”

    Not necessarily.

    “After all, most Hispanic ethnic activists that Biden insiders know are racist anti-whites”

    There is that slogan again—“anti-white”. You would think someone as verbose as yourself would relish the opportunity to clearly define the term and offer specific examples, rather than run away from this request time after time. Maybe you can get your errand boy Hail to take a crack at it. For instance, would John Derbyshire and JD Vance, by virtue of marrying outside of their race, be guilty of “race treason”? Asking for a friend…

    “ordinary Latino voters, who tend to find whiteness not hateful, but aspirational.”

    Says who?

    “I absolutely agree our elites should be abolished.”

    So how would you propose a realistic plan to accomplish this goal? Otherwise, saying something like this without a course of action is like punching at waterfalls.

    Replies: @deep anonymous

    , @deep anonymous
    @Achmed E. Newman

    Sailer apparently is desperate to appear respectable and therefore non-threatening to the System.

    Replies: @Buzz Mohawk, @Achmed E. Newman

  • IT companies advertise for jobs – US citizens need not apply:

    ‘No US Citizens’: Meet the IT Firms Discriminating Against Americans

    https://freebeacon.com/america/no-us-citizens-meet-the-it-firms-discriminating-against-americans/

    How is this even legal? Answer: It isn’t.

    H1-B visas exist because our “elites” despise us and want to replace us. They should be abolished.

    • Agree: deep anonymous, J.Ross, Dmon
    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @Mr. Anon

    "our elites despise us"

    We may be in a pre-revolutionary period here. You always have had rent seeking behavior in this country where the wealthy used political influence to get government policies enacted that further enriched them but it has become much worse over the last forty years, with increasing inequality of wealth as the result.

    You see things like medical spending going from six percent of GDP in 1960 to almost triple that now, military spending doubling in constant dollar terms since the fifties, Federal Reserve policies designed to produce wealth for a minority while leading to prices rising faster than wages for the majority, factories being off shored to countries with lower wages, immigrants being brought in on H-1B visas by corporations to replace natives while other immigrants are brought in to provide votes for politicians who promise them welfare benefits.

    Anyone who is honest and who was alive in the eighties will tell you this is not really the same country it was then. There have been big demographic changes, big cultural changes and a lowering in the quality of our elected officials resulting in much more corruption at the highest levels. The nineties seemed to be a turning point as the two major parties moved closer together to form a Washington Uniparty controlled by the elites.

    Replies: @Torna atrás, @James B. Shearer, @Hypnotoad666

    , @Achmed E. Newman
    @Mr. Anon


    H1-B visas exist because our “elites” despise us and want to replace us. They should be abolished.
     
    I absolutely agree our elites should be abolished. Thank you for saying what we all think.

    Replies: @Mr. Anon

  • Here’s a new Open Thread for everyone. For those interested, here are my most recent articles: American Pravda: A Dozen Unknown Books and the World War II History They Reveal Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 27, 2025 • 17,600 Words American Pravda: Six Unknown Books Against a Century of Falsehoods Ron Unz...
  • @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Dmon

    Some of the commentary is unintentionally hilarious.


    Tyler Austin Harper: I wrote about “The Will Stancil Show,” arguably the first online series created with the help of AI. Its animation is solid, a few of the jokes are funny, and it has piled up millions of views on Twitter. The show is also—quite literally—Nazi propaganda. And may be the future.

    As its title implies, the show satirizes Will Stancil, the Twitter-famous liberal pundit. This year’s season premiere of The Simpsons had 1.1 million viewers. Just over a week later, the first episode of The Will Stancil Show debuted, accumulating 1.7 million views on Twitter.

    The Will Stancil Show is a watershed event: it proves that political extremists—its creator, Emily Youcis, identifies as a national socialist—can now use AI to make cheap, decent quality narrative entertainment without going through gatekeepers like cable networks or Netflix.
     
    https://thezvi.substack.com/p/ai-145-youve-got-soul

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Dmon

    OK – I had been thinking that younger guys were totally screwed, but guys my age had a chance of kicking off before AI really got out of hand. After reading some of that substack, I’m revising my estimate. We’re all already totally screwed.

    I did like how Chinese tiger moms are using AI to nag their kids during the brief periods when the moms themselves are unavailable to do it. I suppose this would be one of those instances where AI really is enhancing human capability.

    • Replies: @epebble
    @Dmon

    We’re all already totally screwed.

    Just watched a story on CBS 60 minutes program about 13- and 14-year-olds committing suicide because of something called character.ai. I work in technology but can't comprehend what drives today's normal young children from healthy families to this. On Friday, I heard a radio report on young adults in romantic relationship with AI personas. It is a Brave New World Indeed.

    https://www.amazon.com/Brave-New-World-Aldous-Huxley/dp/0060850523

    Replies: @J.Ross

  • @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Dmon


    Inside the Creation of Tilly Norwood, the AI Actress Freaking Out Hollywood
     
    Wall Street Journal

    https://archive.is/lS336#selection-2157.0-2157.75

    Replies: @Dmon

    My money says that the technological advances of AI, just like the technological advances that enabled every other aspect of the modern Internet (digital communication, semiconductor memory, fast graphics) will be driven by the same applications that have been driving the whole Information Age so far : games and porn.

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Dmon

    Some of the commentary is unintentionally hilarious.


    Tyler Austin Harper: I wrote about “The Will Stancil Show,” arguably the first online series created with the help of AI. Its animation is solid, a few of the jokes are funny, and it has piled up millions of views on Twitter. The show is also—quite literally—Nazi propaganda. And may be the future.

    As its title implies, the show satirizes Will Stancil, the Twitter-famous liberal pundit. This year’s season premiere of The Simpsons had 1.1 million viewers. Just over a week later, the first episode of The Will Stancil Show debuted, accumulating 1.7 million views on Twitter.

    The Will Stancil Show is a watershed event: it proves that political extremists—its creator, Emily Youcis, identifies as a national socialist—can now use AI to make cheap, decent quality narrative entertainment without going through gatekeepers like cable networks or Netflix.
     
    https://thezvi.substack.com/p/ai-145-youve-got-soul

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Dmon

  • @deep anonymous
    @Dmon

    Excellent comment. I share your pessimistic outlook. "Our" malevolent rulers are creating the Ultimate Panopticon. They're still working on creating a System that will not require any drones.

    Replies: @Dmon

    You got a LOL from Colitis – good work.

    Of course, we might just be unduly pessimistic about the future. Even as we speak, brilliant young tech-savvy innovators are developing the killer apps for AI that will allow the USA to maintain it’s technological superiority and economic leadership.

    https://www.oann.com/newsroom/fbi-new-kidnapping-scam-employs-ai-altered-images-to-pressure-victims-into-paying-criminals/

    The FBI issued a public service announcement (PSA) warning about a new variation of “virtual kidnapping” scams where criminals use artificial intelligence (AI) to alter publicly available photos, often from social media, as fake “proof-of-life” evidence to extort ransoms from victims.

    In these schemes, scammers contact victims via text, claim to have abducted a loved one, demand immediate payment, often in cryptocurrency or gift cards, and send manipulated images or videos showing the supposed hostage in distress — sometimes with features like “timed messaging.”

    I would note that I do not consider this all that much more criminal than say, Open AI’s business model.

    • LOL: kaganovitch
    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Dmon


    Inside the Creation of Tilly Norwood, the AI Actress Freaking Out Hollywood
     
    Wall Street Journal

    https://archive.is/lS336#selection-2157.0-2157.75

    Replies: @Dmon

  • @epebble
    Nothing that dramatic at all. We can see our future by looking at U.K. (and add a little Europe, a dash of Japan). You learn a lot by watching, as our beloved Yogi (Berra) used to say. As interesting as the money problems are, it is "women voting with their wombs" issue that is less noticed.

    Replies: @Dmon

    If you’re replying to my comment above, yes I agree – the UK is our most likely model. A (relatively) slow slide into insignificance, penury and anarcho-tyranny. At any given moment, nobody will really notice any abrupt collapse, but future historians will clearly see the deterioration.

  • @Mike Tre
    @Dmon

    "I didn’t really mean to get into it that deep."

    Neither did I.

    "then you need to take into account that they’re buying about half as many gallons now as they did then" ..per mile. A lot has changed was my point. You can't just cherry pick one metric if you want to examine total cost to the household. Half as many gallons. driving x times more miles (by design) and paying x times more taxes on it.

    "God, are you young guys fu#ked. " I'm 50. No offense because I like your contributions here, but don't act surprised when you get grief for reinforcing boomer stereotypes. It's the dissidents within your generation who should be storming the gates of Blackrock and the ADL. The lectures from you guys don't really stand up when you're all perfectly content to die in your beds.

    Replies: @Dmon

    “then you need to take into account that they’re buying about half as many gallons now as they did then” ..per mile. A lot has changed was my point. You can’t just cherry pick one metric if you want to examine total cost to the household. Half as many gallons. driving x times more miles (by design) and paying

    Yeah, after a little more thought, I agree.

    [MORE]

    I knew you were around 50 – I’ve seen the clues like Gulf War deployments and trying to beat the snot out of Rodney Dangerfield. “Young guys” referred to everybody who probably won’t be dead within the next 10-15 years or so. I guess the comment about you young guys being fu#cked came off like typical boomer “why couldn’t you young punks be born into a super rich country with no competition and have a fuck-up proof life like we did?” rant, but that wasn’t the intent at all. What I was trying to get at is that the future, in no small part due to so-called AI, is going to be (I think) a hostile place for anybody trying to live like a historic American with some degree of freedom and dignity. As AI spreads it’s tentacles everywhere, the line between true and false becomes almost impossible to distinguish – they flood the information spectrum with propaganda and bullshit, and LLMs feed on that and reinforce it and at some point all the people who know the difference are dead.

    With Biden, using total media domination, they were able to get away with a John Gill scenario (boomer Star Trek reference). In the future, they won’t even need that. You won’t even be able to tell who’s real, let alone where they’re at. The covid lockdowns were sort of a trial run. Some local official would issue an edict, and I would want to take a tire iron to his head, but you couldn’t find the bastards. Future government is going to be like that all the time – it’s not like you’ll be able to go to the town meeting and convince your fellow citizens to support your cause. The “town meeting” is virtual, if it even took place at all. Some anonymous agency tells you that your tires left too much rubber on the road so you owe a 2 grand latex recycling fee and that’s that. Storming Blackrock is pointless – you’re not going to find Larry Fink and stick his head on a pike. Once in a while, with extreme effort, a Luigi gets lucky, but usually all the guys like Fink and Zuckerberg are in their bunkers on their private islands, and you can’t predict when and where they’re going to pop up.

    I will say that I think LLM type AI is basically worthless as far as increasing human potential and improving life through technology. And all that data storage that’s being built up is going to go to surveillance. There is a non-negligible chance (in my opinion – ymmv) that the future is going to be government housing, and they will monitor the content of your shit and dock you UBI credits if you have been consuming products not authorized under your state diet plan (unless you’re black, in which case, have at it). I think the most likely ways around it are 1.)fight them with their own weapons, like Anonymous, which requires a skill set boomers are sadly lacking or 2.)hope the whole system collapses, which is possible but not really a pleasant prospect either. I guess we could try becoming ungovernable like blacks, but when enough people do that, that’s option 2 above.

    Anyway, I really wasn’t trying to lecture you at all – just expressing my native pessimism. Most people aren’t gate stormers – that’s why the threepers are the threepers, not the eightypers. And I’ll add this, During the covid era, the absolute most brainwashed and docile guys I encountered were the millennials- the guys in their early thirties, who voted for Obama in their first presidential election. The Gen X guys were generally based, the remaining boomers kind of split (don’t forget – boomers may have been hippies, but they also fought the Vietnam War), but the Gen Y guys were almost completely hopeless. And they’re going to be around a lot longer than me.

    Well, sorry for blowing so much wind. You are a great commenter here, and I value your opinion, so just trying to make myself a little clearer. Carry on.

    • Thanks: Mike Tre
    • Replies: @deep anonymous
    @Dmon

    Excellent comment. I share your pessimistic outlook. "Our" malevolent rulers are creating the Ultimate Panopticon. They're still working on creating a System that will not require any drones.

    Replies: @Dmon

    , @Mike Tre
    @Dmon

    Great observations and I appreciate the reply. And sadly, Rodney, even at 75, did enough blow to outrun my big Irish ass!

    Replies: @Dmon

  • @Currdog73
    @deep anonymous

    Just one of those things that stick, my dad's pet peeve was saying a car had a motor, like "what motor does it have?". Engines are mechanical motors are electrical. Funny how you remember those things, my brother and I still laugh about it, kinda of like hold the flashlight, "can you see yeah well I can't see a damn thing move the light."

    Replies: @Dmon, @Mr. Anon

    My older brother, who worked as a mechanic in his younger days, always said “motor mounts”. He gave me alot of crap about inadequate flashlight handling and other stuff, but since he was a)helping me get my beater shitheap running and b)alot bigger than me and of a somewhat ornery disposition, I usually let it slide.

    • Replies: @deep anonymous
    @Dmon

    Many years ago I worked in the automotive parts business. Always called them "motor mounts." But otherwise always called it an "engine," using "motor" for an electrical motor like you (or somebody) said previously in this thread.

    Replies: @Currdog73

  • @deep anonymous
    @Dmon

    They made a special meter called a dwell meter to adjust the point gap indirectly but way more precisely. That is what that window was for. Loved it too.

    My girlfriend had a 1966 Buick Special station wagon her Dad had given her. Had a 300 cu. in. V-8. Awesome car.

    I can't remember for certain, but that 1962 you had might have had aluminum heads. Saved weight but presented problems if not properly maintained--frequent oil changes and above all else, never run one too hot, the heads would warp.

    Replies: @Currdog73, @Dmon

    I liked those old Chrysler Slant-6s – cheap to maintain, easy to work on, but even with all that cast iron you had to be careful. I think all inline-6 engines were prone to blown head gaskets – there was just too much temperature difference between the front and the back. That being said, I had a 71 Dart with a torqueflite automatic, got it in ’76 or so, kept driving it to work until about ’93. Engine and transmission still going great guns, but it was getting impossible to find spare parts. I’d need a starter, I’d have to call some junkyard in Nebraska that specialized in Dodges. I got tired of crawling around wrecking yards and sold it to a Dodge fan. My wife insisted on a new car, which was the first new car I ever owned. A few years later, I sold my tach/dwell meter and timing light at a garage sale, cause the cars didn’t have anything you could touch anymore.

    The greatest thing about the ’71 Dart was it predated the Emissions Era. Starting around ’74, Dodge and everybody else had to start doing all this Rube Goldberg emissions control. They didn’t have computers then, so the mid-’70s cars were just these nightmare rats nests of vacuum lines. You could get them to start cold, or you could get them to idle smoothly when warm, but you couldn’t do both. My mom had a ’74 Ford that was constantly stalling. She would call my brother or me to try to fix it, but we never could figure out what the hell the problem was. Luckily, it was parked on the street on a Saturday morning, and a couple of guys coming back from a night I wish I’d been at apparently saw two parked cars, flipped a coin and aimed for the real one instead of the imaginary one. I never did get the chance to thank them. They were in a pickup truck, so if one of them was you Currdog, thanks.

  • @Currdog73
    @Dmon

    The Buick skylark came with an aluminum 215 v8 with a 4bbl thanks Google so maybe the special had a non standard engine, it happens. And those aluminum heads do warp and are a major pain.

    Replies: @Dmon, @epebble, @Mike Tre

    Yeah, it was aluminum. I was pretty careful about back flushing the coolant system, putting on new hoses/thermostat/etc. I only ran it up to 90 on rare occasions, such as when I was driving somewhere on a road on a day that ended in the letter “y”.

  • @Mike Tre
    @Dmon

    "Also, I think you need to account for the fact that on average, 2025 gas vehicles get about twice the mpg of 1965 vehicles, so you’re using about half as much gas now for the same distance. "

    That's fine, but then we need to account for every possible variable, such as the cost of refining, applied taxes, transportation, subsidies, accessible resources, etc, etc.

    Politicians have pretty much admitted that increased fuel taxation is largely to offset the loss of tax revenue due to more fuel efficient vehicles. But it is still a cost.

    Replies: @Dmon

    I didn’t really mean to get into it that deep. All I was getting at was that Grok chose to use “cost per gallon as a fraction of average family income” as one of the comparison parameters between the ’60s and today. If you’re going to use that to determine how much of a family’s income is spent on gas, then you need to take into account that they’re buying about half as many gallons now as they did then (on average – the whole SUV exemption regime sort of blows “average fleet mpg” to hell).

    Really, the whole Grok excerpt was sort of meaningless and confusing as to what it was trying to prove (even without contradicting itself from one paragraph to the next). I for one welcome our new AI overlords and look forward with anticipation to the day when humans are completely eliminated from all technical, managerial and government systems. God, are you young guys fu#ked.

    • Replies: @Mike Tre
    @Dmon

    "I didn’t really mean to get into it that deep."

    Neither did I.

    "then you need to take into account that they’re buying about half as many gallons now as they did then" ..per mile. A lot has changed was my point. You can't just cherry pick one metric if you want to examine total cost to the household. Half as many gallons. driving x times more miles (by design) and paying x times more taxes on it.

    "God, are you young guys fu#ked. " I'm 50. No offense because I like your contributions here, but don't act surprised when you get grief for reinforcing boomer stereotypes. It's the dissidents within your generation who should be storming the gates of Blackrock and the ADL. The lectures from you guys don't really stand up when you're all perfectly content to die in your beds.

    Replies: @Dmon

  • @Almost Missouri
    @Buzz Mohawk


    he had flown fighter planes for the RAAF during WWII. He got shot down once.
     
    Pacific theater? If that's where he was shot down, he was fortunate to be alive since many pilots simply disappeared into the ocean's vastness.

    Also, why do we let the Royal Navy dock in southern California? It's not near any British holdings.

    Replies: @Currdog73, @Dmon, @Buzz Mohawk

    Also, why do we let the Royal Navy dock in southern California?

    To make it a little easier for the Chinese to spy on them?
    https://news.usni.org/2025/08/21/u-s-navy-sailor-faces-life-in-prison-for-selling-secrets-to-china

  • @Currdog73
    @Dmon

    Yeah but can your "fuel efficient" jap crap be as much fun to drive as a 65 Plymouth Belvedere with a 440 and 4 speed?

    Replies: @Dmon

    Actually, the funnest car I ever owned was a ’62 Buick Special, which I picked from my neighbor after his 85 yr old dad tried to park it on the front porch a couple of times. Buick meant it to be a compact V-6, but that one year they made a pony V-8 (maybe a 215 or something like that) with a Rochester 4-barrel carb. The car was kind of a beater from his misadventures with off-roading, and it took a while to go from 0-60. But when those secondary barrels kicked in, it went from 60 to 90 in about a quarter second, shaking like a mother. I never had to change the oil, because it went through so much, I just kept pouring in that green sludge (Ray Lube?) they used to sell at Thrifty Drugs for 19 cents a quart or something like that. The other thing I liked about it was that little window they used to put on the distributor cap, so you could adjust the dwell angle with the engine running. It’s been a long time since I owned a car on which you could adjust anything at all – modern cars, I’m not sure I could even adjust the radio channel (if it even has one).

    • Thanks: Almost Missouri
    • Replies: @Currdog73
    @Dmon

    Since we were car guys and my dad the "shade tree mechanic" was always trading cars, he had a 61 Buick LsSabre 2dr hardtop with a 445 wildcat (just what they called it, it was a 429 nail head if you're a car guy). When I was in college and my truck was broke I drove it, damn thing would cruise at 120.

    Replies: @Corpse Tooth

    , @deep anonymous
    @Dmon

    They made a special meter called a dwell meter to adjust the point gap indirectly but way more precisely. That is what that window was for. Loved it too.

    My girlfriend had a 1966 Buick Special station wagon her Dad had given her. Had a 300 cu. in. V-8. Awesome car.

    I can't remember for certain, but that 1962 you had might have had aluminum heads. Saved weight but presented problems if not properly maintained--frequent oil changes and above all else, never run one too hot, the heads would warp.

    Replies: @Currdog73, @Dmon

    , @Currdog73
    @Dmon

    The Buick skylark came with an aluminum 215 v8 with a 4bbl thanks Google so maybe the special had a non standard engine, it happens. And those aluminum heads do warp and are a major pain.

    Replies: @Dmon, @epebble, @Mike Tre

    , @epebble
    @Dmon

    I’m not sure I could even adjust the radio channel

    I can say for certain that is the case with 2008 Chevrolet Uplander minivan.

    https://da8h1v3w8q6n5.cloudfront.net/ok06/images/A25224/A25224_118048.jpg

  • @Mike Tre
    @Achmed E. Newman

    "Exactly why should it be $2/G, Mike? The price of everything shows us the loss of buying power of the US $.... ... Would you say that gasoline was WAY too expensive in 1964? It was something like 20-25 cents. Going by those silver dimes, with 0.073 tr-oz of silver in each, you can buy more gas by a factor of 2 1/2 now as compared to in 1964."

    Not really, energy costs cannot be compared to other commodities directly. Second, the petrolium fuel gouging that began during Iraq II and especially 2003 - 2005 was a mostly manufactured event, and not related to normal inflation/market forces.

    Per Grok:


    To compare affordability directly:

    1960s:
    Cost per gallon as fraction of annual income: $0.31 / $5,600 ≈ 0.0000554 (or 0.00554%).
    Gallons affordable per dollar of income: 1 / $0.31 ≈ 3.23 gallons per dollar.

    2025:
    Cost per gallon as fraction of annual income: $3.10 / $62,192 ≈ 0.0000498 (or 0.00498%).
    Gallons affordable per dollar of income: 1 / $3.10 ≈ 0.323 gallons per dollar.


    Comparison:

    In the 1960s, $1 bought ~3.23 gallons of gas.
    In 2025, $1 buys ~0.323 gallons of gas.
    This is a ~90% drop in gallons per dollar, meaning gasoline is more expensive now per dollar earned—it takes about 10 times more income dollars to buy the same gallon today compared to the 1960s.

    Alternatively, the relative burden (gas price as % of income) is ~11% higher today (0.00554% vs. 0.00498% of annual income per gallon).
     

    Replies: @Dmon, @Achmed E. Newman

    Alternatively, the relative burden (gas price as % of income) is ~11% higher today (0.00554% vs. 0.00498% of annual income per gallon).

    Doesn’t Grok have that backwards? The fraction of of annual income per gallon is lower today (0.00498%) than in the 1960s (0.00554%).

    Also, I think you need to account for the fact that on average, 2025 gas vehicles get about twice the mpg of 1965 vehicles, so you’re using about half as much gas now for the same distance.

    • Replies: @Currdog73
    @Dmon

    Yeah but can your "fuel efficient" jap crap be as much fun to drive as a 65 Plymouth Belvedere with a 440 and 4 speed?

    Replies: @Dmon

    , @Mike Tre
    @Dmon

    "Also, I think you need to account for the fact that on average, 2025 gas vehicles get about twice the mpg of 1965 vehicles, so you’re using about half as much gas now for the same distance. "

    That's fine, but then we need to account for every possible variable, such as the cost of refining, applied taxes, transportation, subsidies, accessible resources, etc, etc.

    Politicians have pretty much admitted that increased fuel taxation is largely to offset the loss of tax revenue due to more fuel efficient vehicles. But it is still a cost.

    Replies: @Dmon

  • @res
    @deep anonymous

    Interesting. Thanks. This seems to be the crux.


    The composition of household spending transformed completely. In 2024, food-at-home is no longer 33% of household spending. For most families, it’s 5 to 7 percent.

    Housing now consumes 35 to 45 percent. Healthcare takes 15 to 25 percent. Childcare, for families with young children, can eat 20 to 40 percent.

    If you keep Orshansky’s logic—if you maintain her principle that poverty could be defined by the inverse of food’s budget share—but update the food share to reflect today’s reality, the multiplier is no longer three.

    It becomes sixteen.

    Which means if you measured income inadequacy today the way Orshansky measured it in 1963, the threshold for a family of four wouldn’t be $31,200.

    It would be somewhere between $130,000 and $150,000.
     
    I think focusing on food at home is a problem given how much more people eat out now (which makes me wonder where eating out is counted since I don't see it in the categories he quotes). This suggests his multiplier is off, but I think the basic idea is sound.

    Then there is this:

    Our entire safety net is designed to catch people at the very bottom, but it sets a trap for anyone trying to climb out. As income rises from $40,000 to $100,000, benefits disappear faster than wages increase.

    I call this The Valley of Death.
     
    Can anyone with a subscription summarize the tone of the comments?

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Almost Missouri, @Sam Hildebrand

    The MSN article is really a WaPo article, which is really just an abbreviation of a Substack post:
    https://www.yesigiveafig.com/p/part-1-my-life-is-a-lie
    by portfolio-manager-with-a-bad-conscience Michael W. Green.

    The MSN/WaPo summary focused on the matter of the Federal Poverty Line being 3× the 1963 minimum food cost adjusted for inflation, which obviously depends a lot on how well the inflation adjustment has been going. Green himself seems to get confused about this in the part you quote, apparently believing that today’s Poverty Line is calculated from today’s food prices rather than from the arbitrary marker × the inflation adjustment.

    While I agree with Mr. Green and the ShadowStats guy that “hedonics” is BS and the inflation calculation has been nerfed, the real problem Green ‘discovers’ is the “Valley of Death” where lowest incomes are government-subsidized while medium incomes are system-penalized, meaning that below upper-middle class, you’re probably better off just checking out of the formal economy and soaking up as much welfare as possible.

    But he’s hardly the first one to make this observation.

    For instance here was ZeroHedge fifteen years ago:

    http://www.zerohedge.com/article/entitlement-america-head-household-making-minimum-wage-has-more-disposable-income-family-mak

    It’s in the ZH archives now, so I’ll reproduce it below the MORE tag, but it’s also at internet archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20110108053618/http://www.zerohedge.com/article/entitlement-america-head-household-making-minimum-wage-has-more-disposable-income-family-mak

    [MORE]

    In Entitlement America, The Head Of A Household Of Four Making Minimum Wage Has More Disposable Income Than A Family Making $60,000 A Year

    By Tyler Durden
    Created 11/21/2010 – 23:18

    http://www.zerohedge.com/users/tyler-durden
    Submitted by Tyler Durden on 11/21/2010 23:18 -0500

    Tonight’s stunning financial piece de resistance comes from Wyatt Emerich of The Cleveland Current. In what is sure to inspire some serious ire among all those who once believed Ronald Reagan that it was the USSR that was the “Evil Empire”, Emmerich analyzes disposable income and economic benefits among several key income classes and comes to the stunning (and verifiable) conclusion that “a one-parent family of three making $14,500 a year (minimum wage) has more disposable income than a family making $60,000 a year.” And that excludes benefits from Supplemental Security Income disability checks. America is now a country which punishes those middle-class people who not only try to work hard, but avoid scamming the system. Not surprisingly, it is not only the richest and most audacious thieves that prosper – it is also the penny scammers at the very bottom of the economic ladder that rip off the middle class each and every day, courtesy of the world’s most generous entitlement system. Perhaps if Reagan were alive today, he would wish to modify the object of his once legendary remark.
    From Emmerich:

    You can do as well working one week a month at minimum wage as you can working $60,000-a-year, full-time, high-stress job.
    My chart tells the story. It is pretty much self-explanatory.

    Stunning? Just do it yourself.

    Almost all welfare programs have Web sites where you can call up “benefits calculators.” Just plug in your income and family size and, presto, your benefits are automatically calculated.
    The chart is quite revealing. A one-parent family of three making $14,500 a year (minimu wage) has more disposable income than a amily making $60,000 a year.

    And if that wasn’t enough, here is one that will blow your mind:
    If the family provider works only one week a month at minimum wage, he or she makes 92 percent as much as a provider grossing $60,000 a year.
    Ever wonder why Obama was so focused on health reform? It is so those who have no interest or ability in working, make as much as representatives of America’s once exalted, and now merely endangered, middle class.

    First of all, working one week a month, saves big-time on child care. But the real big-ticket item is Medicaid, which has minimal deductibles and copays. By working only one week a month at a minimum wage job, a provider is able to get total medical coverage for next to nothing.
    Compare this to the family provider making $60,000 a year. A typical Mississippi family coverage would cost around $12,000, adding deductibles and copays adds an additional $4,500 or so to the bill. That’s a huge hit.

    There is a reason why a full time worker may not be too excited to learn there is little to show for doing the “right thing.”

    The full-time $60,000-a-year job is going to be much more demanding than woring one week a month at minimu wage. Presumably, the low-income parent will have more energy to attend to the various stresses of managing a household.

    It gets even scarier if one assumes a little dishonesty is thrown in the equation.

    If the one-week-a-month worker maintains an unreported cash-only job on the side, the deal gets better than a regular $60,000-a-year job. In this scenario, you maintain a reportable, payroll deductible, low-income job for federal tax purposes. This allows you to easily establish your qualification for all these welfare programs. Then your black-market job gives you additional cash without interfering with your benefits. Some economists estimate there is one trillion in unreported income each year in the United States.
    This really got me thinking. Just how much money could I get if I set out to deliberately scam the system? I soon realized that getting a low-paying minimum wage job would set the stage for far more welfare benefits than you could earn in a real job, if you were weilling to cheat. Even if you dodn’t cheat, you could do almost as well working one week a month at minimum wage than busting a gut at a $60,000-a-year job.

    Now where it gets plainly out of control is if one throws in Supplemental Security Income.

    SSI pays $8,088 per year for each “disabled” family member. A person can be deemed “disabled” if thy are totally lacking in the cultural and educational skills needed to be employable in the workforce.
    If you add $24,262 a year for three disability checks, the lowest paid welfare family would now have far more take-home income than the $60,000-a-year family.

    Best of all: being on welfare does not judge you if you are stupid enough not to take drugs all day, every day to make some sense out of this Mephistophelian tragicomedy known as living in the USA:

    Most private workplaces require drug testing, but there is no drug testing to get welfare checks.

    Alas, on America’s way to to communist welfare, it has long since surpassed such bastions of capitalism as China:

    The welfare system in communist China is far stringier. Those people have to work to eat.

    We have been writing for over a year, how the very top of America’s social order steals from the middle class each and every day. Now we finally know that the very bottom of the entitlement food chain also makes out like a bandit compared to that idiot American who actually works and pays their taxes. One can only also hope that in addition to seeing their disposable income be eaten away by a kleptocratic entitlement state, that the disappearing middle class is also selling off its weaponry. Because if it isn’t, and if it finally decides it has had enough, the outcome will not be surprising at all: it will be the same old that has occurred in virtually every revolution in the history of the world to date.
    h/t Nolsgrad

    • Thanks: deep anonymous, res, Dmon
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    @Almost Missouri

    Yes, indeed, Mr. Missouri, many such cases. Seriously, way before ZeroHedge was a gleam in Tyler Durden's eye, this type of talk about the lack of incentive to get out of the arms of the Welfare State goes back to Ronald Reagan. That was back in the era when there were actual Food Stamps, very visible to other, tax-paying rather than -eating people in the check-out line at the grocery.

    In the closer to here-and-now, I remember a number for single mothers that was something like $40,000, maybe even $60,000, in decade ago dollars that was the crossing point for a salary that would get her the same goods and services as she could get from Daddy Government among all the different programs she'd be eligible for. That was not one of the 2 articles you linked us to, but same idea.

  • @Currdog73
    @Dmon

    I on the other hand have been to Stockton (over the hills and through the valleys) and it's way east and north of San Francisco.

    Replies: @Dmon

    It’s the All-California City. They get the rainy foggy San Francisco winters, the hotter than the bowels of Hell central valley summers, and the Oakland crime rate all year round. Topped off with the delightful ambience of the millions of tons of bulk fertilizer that goes to China through the port there.

  • @YetAnotherAnon

    "At least four people have been killed in a mass shooting at a child's birthday party in California. Ten others were injured in the shooting at a restaurant on Saturday evening, in the state's northern city of Stockton. Local police say the victims include both adults and children. The conditions of the injured have not been confirmed. A suspect is still on the loose and police say they believe the shooting may have been "targeted".

    The San Joaquin County Sheriff's Office said the shooting happened shortly before 18:00 local time (02:00 GMT on Sunday), and is appealing to anyone with "information, video footage, or who may have witnessed any part of the incident" to come forward. Spokeswoman Heather Brent described the incident as "unfathomable", adding: "This is a very active and ongoing investigation, and information remains limited. Early indications suggest this may be a targeted incident, and investigators are exploring all possibilities.""
     
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg81p61dnmo

    I may be stereotyping, but I can't help thinking the incident might be fathomable.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Almost Missouri, @Dmon, @Mike Tre

    The unfathomable part is when the mayor says “Stockton is better than this”. She may be the mayor, but I don’t think she’s ever been to Stockton.

    • Replies: @Currdog73
    @Dmon

    I on the other hand have been to Stockton (over the hills and through the valleys) and it's way east and north of San Francisco.

    Replies: @Dmon

  • @Almost Missouri
    @deep anonymous


    the 2008 financial crisis crystallized the hopeless corruption that is the financialized US System.
     
    About the same time as the US Financial Crisis, a food company in China was discovered to have dishonestly listed the ingredients in its product. Some people were sickened but no one died.

    The Chinese government sent 26 of the company's executive staff to prison for this and two were sentenced to death.

    For dishonestly listing ingredients.

    How many prosecutions were there in the US for financial firms dishonestly listing their ingredients?

    Replies: @Corvinus, @Dmon, @James B. Shearer

    For dishonestly listing ingredients, or for getting caught and blowing the country’s cover?

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    @Dmon

    Thanks for the Captain Peugeot clip, Dmon, and you are quite right on the real story. Chinese governments are always on anti-corruption campaigns and such. It's corruption all the way down and all the way up.

    , @kaganovitch
    @Dmon


    For dishonestly listing ingredients, or for getting caught and blowing the country’s cover?
     
    Old Yaakov Smirnoff joke : A Soviet citizen who called the Foreign Minister an idiot was sentenced to 15 years in Siberia. One year for insulting a Soviet official and 14 years for revealing a state secret.

    Replies: @James B. Shearer

  • @James B. Shearer
    @Almost Missouri

    "In which category would you place psychiatrists?"

    I expect there is a range. I expect some psychiatrists have a pretty good understanding of the state of psychiatric knowledge and mostly know what they are talking about. Others less so although as licensed medical doctors one would hope for some minimal level of competence.

    I don't have a problem with psychiatrists giving their professional opinion about something in court as long as it includes appropriate caveats. So if something is a borderline case or a close call they should say so. Of course there is a general problem with expert witnesses in that the opposing lawyers will try to select experts who are inclined to favor their side. Whether because of sincere but eccentric views within the profession or because they are getting paid.

    Replies: @Almost Missouri

    In which category would you place psychiatrists?

    I expect there is a range.

    Which part of the range exceeds the ~0% success rate that characterizes the field of psychology?

    • Agree: Dmon
    • Replies: @James B. Shearer
    @Almost Missouri

    "Which part of the range exceeds the ~0% success rate that characterizes the field of psychology?"

    I expect most psychiatrists can do an adequate job of diagnosing the most common serious mental disorders. Better than I could anyway. The fact that they have for the most part no good treatments is unfortunate but doesn't mean they know nothing.

  • @epebble
    @Dmon

    I am not arguing that Wabtec's locomotives are a good replacement for Diesel Electrics right now. But traction battery technology is barely a couple of decades old, while diesel electrics have been around for 70 years. China is doing tremendous R & D on new battery technology as they are going completely electrical for road transport. If battery efficiency increases by a factor of 2 or 4, suddenly, the economics will change. Nobody thought of battery cars till lithium battery showed up.

    About substations: All overhead line based electric traction use traction transformers (the picture is from London's tube) that have substations to step down 110KV to 25KV AC for modern locos and (rectifiers for) 1500 VDC for older lines. 110KV is not something special. It is the standard intermediate transmission line voltage. Long distance (grid) ties use 400KV or 750KV DC. Outside of U.S., much of rail traffic is electric traction based.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Dmon

    OK, you don’t need a substation for 110kV, if you have the London Subway or an Overhead Electric Railroad handy.

    This one’s about beat to death, but one more time:

    Wabtec is a little stingy with details, so here’s the specs for the Chinese knockoff equivalent:
    https://dekonpower.com/pantograph-charging-station-china-manufacture/

    You will notice that the input power form is 400V AC, just like all heavy industrial power in the US (US is 480VAC). Wabtec does the same thing for their chargers. At some point, the charger requires utilities voltage – you cannot hook the lithium battery charger up to 25kV, 110kV or anything higher than 480V. Wabtec shows a spec on their panto charger called “rated voltage”, which is almost certainly the maximum input voltage the charger can accept. The number shown is 750vdc. If you full-wave rectify 480V 3 phase, you will get nominally about 650V. If the line is at it’s maximum level (15% higher), then you’re right at 750V. So if you are charging at 4.1MW, your service must accomodate 4.1MW/480V=8540A.

    OK, I’m done.

    https://dekonpower.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/e5beaee4bfa1e59bbee78987_20220516134417.png

    • Thanks: Currdog73
  • @epebble
    @Dmon

    Stationary pantographs like

    https://www.wabteccorp.com/sites/default/files/styles/scale_width_527/public/2020-08/Wabtec-Transit-Bus-Power-Collection-ChargingPANTO-480x480-4.jpg.webp

    get their power from a traction transformer like

    https://resources.news.e.abb.com/images/2019/11/28/0/73283f5a6540839fc1257c3c004721d1_ef72246d-6ab0-4332-9830-1b0713b2babf_ABB_Traction_transformers_power_London_infrastructure_projects.jpg

    Which are usually powered by 110KV lines.

    Replies: @Currdog73, @Dmon

    What Currdog said, plus the following:
    -Yes, if your stationary pantograph is at the city’s central electric bus station, you have access to very high voltage AC, at considerable expense. Elsewhere, not so much. Unless you want to invest in your own substation.
    -The Wabtec pantograph charger (or any other electrical equipment) cannot take 110KV input, so those transformers have a big step down ratio in order to get to utilities level power. You moved the copper from the power lines to the transformer.
    -Those transformers are filled with a liquid dielectric which is some of the nastiest stuff on earth. Years ago, I worked with guys who made high voltage transformers. They all had this Parkinson’s-like twitch and they were showing Alzheimer’s -like symptoms in their 40’s. For that matter, lithium mining is a pretty nasty operation too.
    -Using Currdog’s example, it’s about a 700 mile train trip from Albuquerque to LA. With one Wabtec locomotive, you have to stop every 120 miles to charge for 2 hours. The Diesel can go nonstop. You need 6 battery powered locomotives to compete with one Diesel. What’s the point?

    • Agree: deep anonymous
    • Thanks: Almost Missouri
    • Replies: @epebble
    @Dmon

    I am not arguing that Wabtec's locomotives are a good replacement for Diesel Electrics right now. But traction battery technology is barely a couple of decades old, while diesel electrics have been around for 70 years. China is doing tremendous R & D on new battery technology as they are going completely electrical for road transport. If battery efficiency increases by a factor of 2 or 4, suddenly, the economics will change. Nobody thought of battery cars till lithium battery showed up.

    About substations: All overhead line based electric traction use traction transformers (the picture is from London's tube) that have substations to step down 110KV to 25KV AC for modern locos and (rectifiers for) 1500 VDC for older lines. 110KV is not something special. It is the standard intermediate transmission line voltage. Long distance (grid) ties use 400KV or 750KV DC. Outside of U.S., much of rail traffic is electric traction based.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Dmon

  • @Almost Missouri
    @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality


    So Black thugs are setting White people on fire in NYC.
     
    I think it was a Guatemalan thug in NYC.

    This black thug was in Chicago.

    The black stabber thug was NC.

    All on trains though.

    All victims unaccompanied women, BTW.

    All suspects had prior criminal history. All had been released to resume predation by commie judges. Probably all were schizophrenic and so benefitted from the Left's campaign to normalize mental illness.

    It is surprising that so many schizos now carry a personal gasoline supply though.

    Replies: @OilcanFloyd, @Mike Tre, @Curle, @deep anonymous

    “Probably all were schizophrenic and so benefitted from the Left’s campaign to normalize mental illness.”

    Knowing what we know – can we even place negroes into the same framework of what we call “mental illness” as whites? I mean, what makes a white person schizophrenic may not be applicable to a negro at all.

    So I’m not sure we can call this behavior by negroes schizophrenic – we don’t cite schizophrenia when a pit bull mauls a child. We just recognize a life form that while often amicable, can violently lash out at any moment. There’s even a pattern: Pit bulls typically attack small children, and negroes attack women. So both attackers, consciously or not, pick a safe target that it can easily overpower.

    • Agree: J.Ross, Dmon, Currdog73
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    @Mike Tre

    “Knowing what we know – can we even place negroes into the same framework of what we call “mental illness” as whites? I mean, what makes a white person schizophrenic may not be applicable to a negro at all.”

    This is ignorance, stupidity, and ass hattery at its finest. Congrats on your trifecta.

    , @Almost Missouri
    @Mike Tre

    The question could be expanded to whether we even know when whites are schizophrenic or not. Psychologists claim they can draw bright lines between who is schizophrenic and who is not, but they don't have a very good scientific track record on much else except IQ, so I don't know whether to take them seriously or not.

    Accepting psychology's claims at face value, blacks have something like triple the schizophrenia rate of whites, so once again, the underlying problem may be less "mental illness" than just the reality of race itself.


    we don’t cite schizophrenia when a pit bull mauls a child.
     

    Ink Blot @inkblotistan

    "Animals walk around in a state of permanent religious intoxication"
    —Bronze Age Pervert

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gk-MDDaXQAELUsS?format=jpg&name=900x900
     
    https://twitter.com/inkblotistan/status/1895887954419335429

    Replies: @Mike Tre, @Curle, @James B. Shearer

  • @epebble
    @Dmon

    if you decide to recharge in an hour, that’s 4.1MW you need off 480V mains (standard industrial power), or about 8500 Amps

    Wabtec's locomotives get their current via pantographs that operate at 1500 -25 000 V​ and are rated 2400 A. Even at the lowest voltage, 7MWh battery can be charged in about 2 hours. 4.1 MWh needs a bit more than an hour.

    Replies: @Dmon

    So where do the pantograph-style chargers get their power? If you are talking about replacing diesels at an existing facility, that power is coming right from whatever AC is available at that facility. Heavy industry in the US typically has 480V AC, some areas might have 600V AC.

    The 25,000V pantographs are what sit on top of electric trains and ride along high voltage lines. They have nothing to do with charging batteries. Wabtec and everybody else who charges lithium batteries takes AC from the grid, and with a bunch of electronics converts it into a higher voltage DC (in Wabtecs case for the battery powered trains, to 1500V). The pantograph is just the interface to what is being charged. Given that utilities are finicky about power factor (AC-DC converters for battery charging have unacceptable power factors unless you correct it, which requires active circuitry), and lithium based batteries are finicky about how you charge them (unless you’re trying to burn down your rail yard), this may be around a 95% efficient process. At 4.1MW of charging power for 2 hours, you are losing 400kW-h of energy, which is enough to power your house for a couple of weeks. Anyway, unless you decide to include a dedicated substation along with your battery-powered train, you are stuck with whatever AC you’ve got, and you’re going to need some big copper cables to supply the input power to your battery chargers.

    Although I guess they could take some of the diesel locomotives they’re replacing and convert them to diesel generators to power the battery chargers to charge the locomotive batteries.

    • Replies: @Almost Missouri
    @Dmon

    25,000V pantographs must be getting relatively low amperage from the overhead electrical lines. I guess high-volt low-amp juice travels better over distance? Sorta like electric fences.

    Replies: @res

    , @epebble
    @Dmon

    Stationary pantographs like

    https://www.wabteccorp.com/sites/default/files/styles/scale_width_527/public/2020-08/Wabtec-Transit-Bus-Power-Collection-ChargingPANTO-480x480-4.jpg.webp

    get their power from a traction transformer like

    https://resources.news.e.abb.com/images/2019/11/28/0/73283f5a6540839fc1257c3c004721d1_ef72246d-6ab0-4332-9830-1b0713b2babf_ABB_Traction_transformers_power_London_infrastructure_projects.jpg

    Which are usually powered by 110KV lines.

    Replies: @Currdog73, @Dmon

  • @Almost Missouri
    @epebble

    Yeah, diesel trains have electric motors in the transmission, but the source power is still diesel.

    Given that the best batteries have only 1/10th the energy density of diesel, it's hard to see the business case for battery-driven freight trains, unless the electricity is very cheap and the distances are very short.

    Replies: @Dmon

    Correct. Wabtech battery-powered locomotives are targeted for certain specific applications, particularly short switcher routes and short routes with a significant downhill grade (the regenerative braking is used to charge the batteries). The fundamental problem with heavy haul routes is this:
    Wabtech has a 7MW-h battery. Heavy haul locomotives typically operate at about 4500hp, which is about 3.375MW. All things being equal, you’ve got about 2 hours before you have to recharge your battery. Whereas a typical Diesel locomotive goes about 24 hrs on a full tank.

    The Railway Age article linked gives some examples. As of the article publication (Jan. 2025), there were no Wabtech systems operating in line haul applications without either Diesel locomotives in conjunction or the addition of a battery tender (basically, a freight car packed to the gills with extra batteries) to the train. From the article:

    CRRC’s Dalian plant in China produced a six-axle, 1,000 mm (narrow) gauge battery locomotive for Thailand. Following testing, Thailand’s Energy Absolute Public Company Limited (EA) built its own locomotive similar to the Chinese one, calling it the MINE. After a full battery charge, the 4,100-kWH locomotive can operate 200 km (125 miles) while pulling a 1,000-ton passenger train at a speed of 100 kph (62 mph).

    If a 1,000-ton passenger train needs to travel 300 km (186 miles) or more, a battery tender must be attached to it, or the locomotive must be recharged along the route. Such charging requires 60 minutes, but a technology developed in Thailand can be used to replace a discharged battery with a fully pre-charged battery. According to Thai experts, such a replacement can be done in 10 minutes.

    So they can go 125 miles at 62 mph, or about 2 hours, consistent with the amount of available energy storage in the battery. It doesn’t say how the Thai’s replace a battery in 10 minutes – my guess is they just pull the locomotive with the spent battery off on a siding, and hitch a fresh one up to the train. BTW – if you decide to recharge in an hour, that’s 4.1MW you need off 480V mains (standard industrial power), or about 8500 Amps, which is roughly 200 houses running their central AC full blast. If you hear of an application where they are using this approach, buy up as many Rio Tinto shares as you can.

    https://www.wabteccorp.com/FLXdrive-Battery-Electric-Locomotive?inline
    https://www.railwayage.com/mechanical/locomotives/battery-locomotives-debate-continues/

    • Thanks: Almost Missouri, Currdog73
    • Replies: @Currdog73
    @Dmon

    My dad retired from the AT&SF RY (for all you non railroad types that's the Atchison Topeka and the Santa Fe Railroad) and for 6 years worked for a small independent railroad that also repaired and painted railcars. I worked there 4 summers in high school and college so I know a bit about EMD electro motive diesel locomotives I just didn't want to jump in the discussion. So thanks again for helping to educate the folks here about trains.

    Replies: @Joe Stalin

    , @epebble
    @Dmon

    if you decide to recharge in an hour, that’s 4.1MW you need off 480V mains (standard industrial power), or about 8500 Amps

    Wabtec's locomotives get their current via pantographs that operate at 1500 -25 000 V​ and are rated 2400 A. Even at the lowest voltage, 7MWh battery can be charged in about 2 hours. 4.1 MWh needs a bit more than an hour.

    Replies: @Dmon

  • I find this kind of thing fascinating. Robert Trivers, a white, very liberal evolutionary biologist who was a member of the Black Panther Party(!) writes an email to Jeffrey Epstein in which it is obvious Trivers knows race is real and that it matters. He writes to Epstein about his time in Jamica:

    on the downside, Jamaica is increasingly dangerous, murder rate climbing once again, about 6th highest in
    and i encounter a lot of racism, especially from young thugs—not so much hostility as disrespect—they regard me as an easy target—that old white man nah know nothing, we can rob him or do as we please
    yesterday morning at 7am very hostile encounter at an ATM machine, no overt attempt to rob me or i would have shot him dead, just cursing me and my mother out because he had to wait an extra minute or two while i did my transaction—all my Jamaican male friends agree that he would not have acted that way toward a dark-skinned man
    makes me reluctant so spend so much time here or to continue to invest in my property

    He remains liberal and very anti-Trump. It just goes to show, knowing the truth doesn’t mean you are loyal to your own people.

    https://epsteinify.com/api/documents/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031734/image

    • Thanks: Dmon
  • @res
    @Mr. Anon

    Your thoughts seem on target to me. Especially this.


    It seems that the processed foods themselves became worse at some point.
     
    In an attempt to understand both that and your canned soup question I did an AI report discussing changes in Campbell's soups since the 1960s. The excerpt after the MORE gives an idea.



    2.2 Case Study: Cream of Mushroom (The Great Inversion)

    Introduced in 1934 , Cream of Mushroom soup became not just a food but a ubiquitous ingredient, famously described as "America's béchamel" and the "Lutheran binder" for its role in casseroles. Its historical formulation was reportedly that of a "Luxury Soup".

    Then (c. 1960s)
    The historical formulation, according to analyses citing vintage labels, was a true cream-based soup concentrate:

    - Key Ingredients: Cream was the second ingredient listed, indicating it was a primary component by weight.

    - Water Content: Water was the last ingredient on the deck, suggesting it was present in minimal quantities, if at all, apart from the mushroom broth.

    - Flavor Enhancer: The formulation reportedly included Monosodium Glutamate (MSG), even in this historical version, indicating Campbell's long-standing use of umami enhancers.

    Now (c. 2024)
    The modern formulation is a feat of industrial texturizing, a product engineered to mimic a cream soup while using far cheaper, more stable components. The ingredient list has been inverted.

    - Key Ingredients: An analysis of the modern US label shows Water is now the first ingredient.

    - Cream Content: Cream has fallen to the seventh position, listed after "Salt" and "Modified Cornstarch".

    - The "Béchamel" Replacement: The fat and viscosity once provided by a high volume of cream have been replaced by "Vegetable Oil (Corn, Canola, And/Or Soybean)" (the #3 ingredient) and "Modified Cornstarch" (the #4 ingredient).

    This change represents the creation of an "Industrial Béchamel." A traditional béchamel or cream sauce is a simple emulsion of fat (butter), a thickener (flour), and a liquid (cream or milk). The 1960s recipe approximated this. The 2024 recipe has industrially swapped every component: "butter" is now "Vegetable Oil"; "flour" is now "Modified Cornstarch" and "Wheat Flour"; and "cream" is now a composite of "Water," "Whey," and "Soy Protein Concentrate". This new assembly of oil, water, starch, and soy protein is engineered to replicate the mouthfeel, opacity, and "cling" of a high-cream-content soup, all at a fraction of the cost and with indefinite shelf stability.

    Replies: @Hypnotoad666, @William Badwhite, @Brutusale

    It’s a riot that so many believe that food labeling has much to do with what’s in the package.

    I sold packaging and labels to the food industry for 30 years.

    My customer would develop a product, submit the packaging design (with the ingredients and nutrition facts panel) to the USDA for approval, and move forward when the OK came down. They would then order the labeling from me in quantities that made budgetary sense. The salient point is that they ordered labels for multiple production runs; a product that had a 100K monthly output would call for a 600K order with six deliveries.

    Between the first and second production runs, my customer’s purchasing department may have found some better (cheaper or more available) ingredients. They’d apply for a waiver from their USDA rep, which was pretty much automatic, so the old ingredient would be replaced by the new. The waiver allows them to use the old label. Rinse and repeat through the lifespan of the label order, and you have a product with ingredients that the label tells you nothing about.

    The joke in the industry was to call the nutrition facts panel the “Nuts Box”, because you had to be nuts to believe it!

  • @Almost Missouri
    @James B. Shearer

    In the US, electoral responsibility is almost entirely a State matter, usually centered on the office of Secretary of State. Thus we have odd coincidences like red states requiring voter ID while blue states do not or even forbid ID examination.

    Trump is nevertheless taking what measures he can at the Federal level, as other commenters have pointed out.

    Replies: @Dmon

    In the US, electoral responsibility is almost entirely a State matter, usually centered on the office of Secretary of State. Thus we have odd coincidences like red states requiring voter ID while blue states do not or even forbid ID examination.

    Sometimes. it’s even more feudal than that. In the paper I linked to in #792, Mulroy cites a couple of instances in which late mail-in vote counting practices were non-uniform across a state (in the 2020 election). Voter coalition groups brought lawsuits on the grounds of unequal representation, which the courts agreed had merit and standing but refused to hear on the grounds that they were suing the wrong parties. The suits were directed against the Secretary of State, whereas the courts stated that they should have sued the local County election officials of the districts in question. TPTB practice Defense in Depth.

    • Agree: Almost Missouri
  • @James B. Shearer
    @res

    "So you think Biden’s victory in Georgia was legitimate? Sometimes “more or less accurate” is not good enough. A reminder from Wikipedia (a famously pro-Trump source /sarc): “Biden narrowly won Georgia by a 49.47% plurality over Trump’s 49.24% vote share: a margin of 0.23% and 11,779 votes.”"

    Probably. The Wikipedia article is a bit confusing but makes it clear that the "official" margin of 11,779 votes is unlikely to be exactly correct. Various errors changing the margin by hundreds of votes had been made. But it would take many such additional errors all in the same direction to change the result which I consider improbable.

    Regarding Georgia I think it quite possible that if Trump had encouraged his supporters to vote early (as the Democrats encouraged their supporters) that this would have gained him enough votes to change the result. By discouraging early voting by his supporters Trump just handicapped himself for no good reason that I can see.

    Also regarding Georgia, the Governor, Brian Kemp, and the Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, are both Republicans. Trump backed primary challenges against both of them in 2022 but they won easily. They likely had some help from crossover Democrats but Kemp won by 50%, Raffensperger by 20%. So Georgia Republicans apparently didn't find the fraud charges compelling.

    "Your last sentence would be more interesting if it were true (did you really think that would pass unchallenged?! I thought you were better than that)."

    I thought it would be interpreted in a reasonable way. If I said Trump has shown little interest in balancing the budget no doubt you could come up with some statements where Trump gives lip service to the idea or where he cuts some spending he dislikes for other reasons. Nevertheless it seems clear that balancing the budget is a low priority for Trump at best.

    Regarding election security many of the cites refer to Trump's opposition to early voting. But Republicans have traditionally opposed measures to make voting easier because they believed their supporters were more motivated and more able to overcome obstacles. And Democrats have traditionally supported making voting easier for the opposite reasons. The Republicans might use election security as an argument for making voting harder but it wasn't in my view at least their primary motivation.

    Ironically while the party's traditional views of the political effects of making voting easier were likely correct in the past this may no longer the case. Trump seems to do well among marginal voters. And some lefties are starting to say that they should be careful about broad based indiscriminate get out the vote efforts.

    But overall it seems to me at least that Trump didn't do the sort of things you would expect if he was seriously worried about election security. Corvinus posted a link about an election security consultant hired by Trump who had concluded there was no fraud. But the key point as far as I am concerned is that he was hired the day after the election. Obviously if you are serious you hire security consultants well in advance. Also lawyers, the Trump legal challenges were inept. Which is what happens when you hire a bunch of lawyers of dubious ability after the election and expect them to put together convincing arguments on very short notice.

    Replies: @Dmon, @Curle

    Also lawyers, the Trump legal challenges were inept. Which is what happens when you hire a bunch of lawyers of dubious ability after the election and expect them to put together convincing arguments on very short notice.

    There’s a difference between not doing things and doing them ineptly. For one thing, after the election, Trump was pretty strapped for legal representation because anybody he hired to represent him got prosecuted or threatened with disbarment. But before the election, there were quite a few lawsuits brought by local Republican organizations. Most of these were dismissed either on lack of standing or on dubious issues of timing – sue too early and the courts say the harm is purely hypothetical, sue too late and the courts say yeah, you’re right but it’s too late to do anything about it now. Probably the most interesting case in this regard is Bognet (p.18 in the link below). The Pennsylvania Supreme Court changed voting rules unilaterally without consulting the legislature. A Republican candidate brought suit, and was denied on the basis of lacking standing to sue. Prior to this, it was essentially automatic that a candidate had standing to challenge potentially illegal election practices.
    And of course, after the election, there were a whole bunch of legal challenges. Professor Mulroy, the author of the paper, states (either because he believes it or to cover his ass) that most of them were meritless, but that nevertheless, the merits were never determined because they were dismissed on standing. He goes on to say that in many of the cases, the dismissal on the basis of the plaintiffs lacking standing was a departure from standard legal practice and creates troubling legal precedents.

    Whatever you think of Trump, it is pretty clear that the deep state threw rule of law into the gutter and trampled on it in an effort to get him.

    https://insight.dickinsonlaw.psu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1127&context=dlr

  • @James B. Shearer
    @Hypnotoad666

    "I recently heard someone asking “Trump threw a fit over the rigged 2020 election, so why isn’t he launching an investigation to reveal the fraud now?” The answer they came up with is that now he’s in control of the deep state vote rigging apparatus and he may want to deploy it himself. Relatedly, a Republican just bought the Dominion voting machine company."

    This has the objection that Trump was President in 2020 and that if he wasn't in control of the deep state vote rigging apparatus then why would he be confident that he is in charge of it now.

    A somewhat more plausible theory advanced by some lefties prior to the 2024 election was that Trump had deliberately made a bunch of silly claims about vote rigging in 2020 because he was planning massive rigging on his own behalf in 2024 and wanted to goad the Democrats into the position that not only had vote rigging not occurred in 2020 but that it was basically completely impossible today and only a sore loser would claim otherwise. Which would make it hard for the Democrats to object to Trump's vote rigging.

    A few lefties did try to push the idea that Trump must have cheated somehow in 2024 but the pretty uniform national swing in his favor meant this didn't gain much traction even with other lefties.

    Replies: @Dmon

    A somewhat more plausible theory advanced by some lefties prior to the 2024 election was that Trump had deliberately made a bunch of silly claims about vote rigging in 2020 because he was planning massive rigging on his own behalf in 2024 and wanted to goad the Democrats into the position that not only had vote rigging not occurred in 2020 but that it was basically completely impossible today and only a sore loser would claim otherwise. Which would make it hard for the Democrats to object to Trump’s vote rigging.

    After the 2020 election, Trump was apparently finished in politics and in life, subject to what amounted to a Bill of Attainder, and apparently headed to jail and bankruptcy. Anybody who tried to legally represent him was threatened with disbarment and imprisonment, and all the leading figures in his own party had disavowed him. You find it plausible that he was just gaming the 2024 election?

    • Agree: kaganovitch
    • Replies: @James B. Shearer
    @Dmon

    "... Trump was apparently finished in politics ..."

    IIRC he was always the betting favorite (or maybe briefly a close second to DeSantis) for the 2024 Republican nomination.

    "...You find it plausible that he was just gaming the 2024 election?"

    To be clear I didn't believe it, I was just saying it was more plausible than the other theory. But in any case it didn't happen, there wasn't massive fraud by the Republicans in 2024.

  • @Achmed E. Newman
    @Dmon

    Perhaps the following video will impress you and some readers more than the prescience of your neighbor's dog, and the, haha, Special Ed students. Did your nephew see this coming in '03 though, from the womb and all? (I may have mussed up the math for the joke...)

    Thing is, Joe Scarborough, to be Fair, was all impressed AFTER THE FACT with Ron Paul having seen this, but would he have given a wise Libertarian like him the time of day, much less a spot on MSNBC back in '03 when Ron Paul was warning people about the general dangerous financial situation?! No, and I doubt Mr. Scarborough (once he was a good friend of mine) has taken any of Dr. Paul's wisdom to heart. Next thyme this "sage" Joe Scarborough can take his parsley and shove it up his rosemary scented ass.

    Alright, here's the video:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojgBODMioLo

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Hypnotoad666, @Dmon

    I can’t speak for the nephew. But when they took the dog to Petsmart to buy it one of those plastic doghouses, it bared its teeth and snarled. They thought it might have been due to a cat getting a bath in the grooming area nearby, but I’m pretty sure the dog just thought the price was so outrageous that they were going to compensate by cutting back on its milk bones.

  • @Mark G.
    @res

    "One of the best indicators of an accurate view of reality is the ability to make accurate predictions."

    The documentary filmmaker Jimmy Morrison did a documentary where he interviewed people who had correctly predicted that housing was in a bubble and the bubble would eventually pop, which it did in 2008. From what I know of them, they were mostly believers in the Austrian school of economics. The individuals interviewed were Jim Rogers, Ron Paul, Peter Schiff, Marc Faber, Doug Casey, Jim Grant, David Stockman, Gene Epstein, Robert Murphy, Joseph Salerno, Mark Thornton, Roger Garrison, Jeffrey Herbener, Patrick Barron, Peter Wallison, and Naomi Brockwell.

    I thought that was an interesting idea for a documentary, interviewing individuals who had all been right about correctly predicting some future event.

    Replies: @res, @Dmon, @Brutusale

    Not to sound unimpressed, but other people who predicted that we were in a housing bubble at that time were me, everybody I knew, my wife’s Special Ed students, my 3 year old nephew and my neighbor’s dog.
    Sorry – couldn’t resist.
    As Adam Smith would say, “Peace”. 🙂

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    @Dmon

    Perhaps the following video will impress you and some readers more than the prescience of your neighbor's dog, and the, haha, Special Ed students. Did your nephew see this coming in '03 though, from the womb and all? (I may have mussed up the math for the joke...)

    Thing is, Joe Scarborough, to be Fair, was all impressed AFTER THE FACT with Ron Paul having seen this, but would he have given a wise Libertarian like him the time of day, much less a spot on MSNBC back in '03 when Ron Paul was warning people about the general dangerous financial situation?! No, and I doubt Mr. Scarborough (once he was a good friend of mine) has taken any of Dr. Paul's wisdom to heart. Next thyme this "sage" Joe Scarborough can take his parsley and shove it up his rosemary scented ass.

    Alright, here's the video:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojgBODMioLo

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Hypnotoad666, @Dmon

  • @J.Ross
    @Dmon

    Not swore, mumbled vaguely while in front of media microphones. Kash Patel's claim to fame is making every one of those child molesters appear before Congress under oath to admit that there was nothing to all the Russia talk.

    Replies: @Dmon

    Actually, they swore out a FISA warrant to that effect. But it’s all been rectified – the fall guy who put his name on the FISA warrant application got a 30 day suspension with pay. We are ruled by laws, not men, dammit! Falsifying legal documents in an attempt to undermine Our Democracy will not be tolerated!

  • I will also note that Trump has shown little interest (before or after the 2020 election) in making elections more secure suggesting he doesn’t actually think voter fraud is a serious problem.

    https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-vows-end-use-mail-in-ballots-ahead-2026-midterm-election-2025-08-18/

    • Replies: @res
    @Dmon

    I missed that one. Thanks.

  • @James B. Shearer
    @res

    "Voting fraud is largely a solved problem. It is just that we have vested interests intent on not solving it. Actually it is worse than that, they are busy unsolving it."

    I have no idea what you are trying to say here. Do you think for example that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen by means of voter fraud?

    Replies: @Mr. Anon, @Curle, @res, @Dmon, @Mike Tre, @Jim Don Bob

    Do you think for example that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen by means of voter fraud?

    Sounds pretty plausible. The nation’s top Intelligence Agencies swore up and down that the 2016 election was stolen by Russian interference.

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @Dmon

    Not swore, mumbled vaguely while in front of media microphones. Kash Patel's claim to fame is making every one of those child molesters appear before Congress under oath to admit that there was nothing to all the Russia talk.

    Replies: @Dmon

  • @Achmed E. Newman
    @Dmon

    As Buzz did, I looked over your linked-to paper. Firstly, this writer had to start off with the boiler-plate "25 years to save the planet stuff", but I'll get slightly technical rather than polemic on this one:

    a) Economics:

    The biggest flaw that the author sees is Terraforming's using easily twice too high costs (as seen now and forecast by a big accounting firm for a couple of decades) for natural gas from the market. Using a realistic price completely throws off their profit forecasts. (The author speculates that the TF guy used the market price of about $10 kilo-cubic-ft* that was the case only at that time during a peak.) This alone throws it all off.

    Secondly, a big part of the economic calculations that TF uses is IRA - some abbreviation for government tax credits. So the plan only makes money if governments all keep supporting the solar business and Hydrogen business artificially. In other words, it doesn't pencil out in a free market.

    b) The proposed chemical process and products:

    It is not clear here how much of the production will be natural gas and how much will be hydrogen (the one with the tax credit support - see (a).) The hydrogen will be taken from water using electrolysis - LOT of energy needed, well, the same amount needed as one gets from a 100% efficient exothermic reaction when burning hydrogen. The water must be collected from the air using some condensation process that takes energy too. The whole deal, in fact, is based on having VERY cheap solar energy, almost free**.

    So, you expend energy getting water out of the air in the desert, where the relative humidity is what, 10-25% during the day? Then you expend energy in that endothermic electrolysis, then you get your hydrogen. The natural gas process may be less expensive, energy-wise, but no tax credit, AND...

    c) The Climate Calamity™:

    If you're making a lot of natural gas, you can't claim you're saving the planet from that deadly product of clean combustion of hydrocarbons (the other of the two being water). What's the diff between this and getting it out of the ground? (In fact, much natural gas comes free with oil drilling, lest it be flared off. ) So, when/if people ever realize this, you'll lose your virtue credit, hence tax credits.

    I don't know how much of each these the units will make.

    d) ACTUAL climate change:

    (This is not in the paper.) Holy cow, man, we're talking 10% of desert area, per your calculation, Dmon. The area of the whole world is 125 Billion acres, so, though it's not big, that 1.6% is more significant that lots of the Climate Alarmist figures they tell us will kill the planet. What's going on in those 2 Billion acres of desert though? Energy from the sun that would normally heat up the surface, with lots, depending on surface material, being re-radiated out, is being converted to chemical energy and transported away.

    Now, I don't purport to be a Climatologist with my own allegedly-accurate model of the energy balance of the Whole Earth. However, you are changing at least the micro-, well mini- would be more accurate, climate of those desert areas by removing energy, that is a weather change and a change in effective albedo for the big picture. Would those changes be good anyway? I don't know, but don't get on the case of these freaking cows in Denmark, when you plan to change nearly 2% of the Earth's surface yourself!

    I do have an engineering background, A.M. I just like to write polemically a lot because... lazy?

    .

    * Yes, mixed system units, but that's what you get sometimes. I gotta assume these are all ccf - compressed cubic feet, as we see on our gas bills. (With some standard delivery pressure used.)

    ** The writer of this paper notes that. He even does some calculations based on the solar being FREE, and still, not all pencils out to it making money.

    Replies: @Dmon

    Yeah, the Terraform thing is alot of handwaving – it’s vaguely reminiscent of how plastic recycling was going to end pollution. Details have an annoying habit of getting in the way. I think their funding come-on is “natural gas forever”, because it’s clearly a hell of a lot easier just to drill for the stuff, it’s just that you might run out eventually (although they’ve been predicting that for 30 years or so too). As you mentioned, there are alot of details being glossed over. How do they get their water? Electric condensers? Then they either need more power or they make less product. Hydrogels? Then I think they need to double their acreage footprint – the hydrogels will take up as much space as the solar panels. And like you say, what’s the effect of all those solar panels? I’m not sure they’re going to make the desert cooler. Those things are barely 20% efficient. You’ve got these black surfaces sucking up all this sunlight (alot of which would normally be reflected) and turning 20% of it into electricity. What happens to the rest of the heat energy? Do you get a heat island effect, except the size of the Gobi desert? Luckily, we probably won’t ever find out, because, due to the financials, it’s not going to be more than an engineering concept for a really long time.

  • @Almost Missouri
    @Buzz Mohawk

    Haha, yeah I heard of Breatharians when I was working around a bunch of hippie farms.

    I don't think the solar guy is a crackpot though. I think he has identified a market opportunity using math and engineering.

    Don't you have an engineering background? You could evaluate his project:

    https://terraformindustries.wordpress.com/2023/06/26/the-terraformer-mark-one/

    Replies: @Buzz Mohawk, @Dmon, @Mr. Anon

    Here’s an analysis from a neutral source. TLDR conclusion – the fundamental concept is technically workable, but they’re blowing alot of smoke on the finance/feasability side.

    https://klaasnotfound.com/2025/06/03/terraform-industries-business-case-doesnt-add-up/

    My own extremely rough analysis is that a 1MW solar array takes up about 5 acres of space (actually somewhat more, but just the solar panels is about 5 acres, and Terraform doesn’t need the inverters/etc.). Terraform projects deploying 400 million of these to provide for all the planet’s energy needs. So that’s 2 billion acres of solar panels. The total desert area of the Earth is about 20 billion acres (you would want to put these things in the desert because a) that’s where all the sunlight is and b) if you put them in Pacific Palisades, you blow your cost projections out of the water – speaking of water, you also need alot of water to operate the system, but it can make it’s own water, not sure how that impacts the conversion efficiency). Basically, Terraform is projecting covering 10% of the total desert area of the planet with solar panels. That’s alot of petroleum-based plastics.

    • Thanks: Almost Missouri
    • Replies: @Buzz Mohawk
    @Dmon

    That's an excellent analysis you linked to. Thank you.

    To Almost Missouri: I have just read what Dmon linked to, and it's a good evaluation. Also, I am not an engineer, but I am flattered that you thought I had a background in the field. Maybe I learned some things from my father, who was an engineer, a great one in my humble opinion.

    On the energy topic, I suggest people look into thorium-based nuclear power.

    , @Almost Missouri
    @Dmon


    the fundamental concept is technically workable, but they’re blowing a lot of smoke on the finance/feasibility side
     
    Yeah, even in the Manifold interview there seemed to be some goalpost-shifting.

    Still, having read the Klaas critique, the interesting thing is that Terraform's conversion process means there is a breakeven point between electricity and natural gas somewhere around $0.02/kWh depending on the price of natural gas. Two cents per kWh is less than you or I pay, but with ever-cheapening solar panels from China, that might be an attainable figure for on-site installations in sunny climes.

    Unfortunately, one of Nature's jokes on us is that petroleum energy and solar energy tend to be abundant in the same places, so the people who lack one lack both, and those who need petro-energy don't have solar energy to substitute. There are exceptions, such as Australia, which is where Dr. Handmer happens to be from, so this might work out well for Australians, or South Africans (if they can resist stealing the copper). China could maybe use Gobi desert sunlight to produce gas for the industrial East. Europe still out of luck though.
    , @Achmed E. Newman
    @Dmon

    As Buzz did, I looked over your linked-to paper. Firstly, this writer had to start off with the boiler-plate "25 years to save the planet stuff", but I'll get slightly technical rather than polemic on this one:

    a) Economics:

    The biggest flaw that the author sees is Terraforming's using easily twice too high costs (as seen now and forecast by a big accounting firm for a couple of decades) for natural gas from the market. Using a realistic price completely throws off their profit forecasts. (The author speculates that the TF guy used the market price of about $10 kilo-cubic-ft* that was the case only at that time during a peak.) This alone throws it all off.

    Secondly, a big part of the economic calculations that TF uses is IRA - some abbreviation for government tax credits. So the plan only makes money if governments all keep supporting the solar business and Hydrogen business artificially. In other words, it doesn't pencil out in a free market.

    b) The proposed chemical process and products:

    It is not clear here how much of the production will be natural gas and how much will be hydrogen (the one with the tax credit support - see (a).) The hydrogen will be taken from water using electrolysis - LOT of energy needed, well, the same amount needed as one gets from a 100% efficient exothermic reaction when burning hydrogen. The water must be collected from the air using some condensation process that takes energy too. The whole deal, in fact, is based on having VERY cheap solar energy, almost free**.

    So, you expend energy getting water out of the air in the desert, where the relative humidity is what, 10-25% during the day? Then you expend energy in that endothermic electrolysis, then you get your hydrogen. The natural gas process may be less expensive, energy-wise, but no tax credit, AND...

    c) The Climate Calamity™:

    If you're making a lot of natural gas, you can't claim you're saving the planet from that deadly product of clean combustion of hydrocarbons (the other of the two being water). What's the diff between this and getting it out of the ground? (In fact, much natural gas comes free with oil drilling, lest it be flared off. ) So, when/if people ever realize this, you'll lose your virtue credit, hence tax credits.

    I don't know how much of each these the units will make.

    d) ACTUAL climate change:

    (This is not in the paper.) Holy cow, man, we're talking 10% of desert area, per your calculation, Dmon. The area of the whole world is 125 Billion acres, so, though it's not big, that 1.6% is more significant that lots of the Climate Alarmist figures they tell us will kill the planet. What's going on in those 2 Billion acres of desert though? Energy from the sun that would normally heat up the surface, with lots, depending on surface material, being re-radiated out, is being converted to chemical energy and transported away.

    Now, I don't purport to be a Climatologist with my own allegedly-accurate model of the energy balance of the Whole Earth. However, you are changing at least the micro-, well mini- would be more accurate, climate of those desert areas by removing energy, that is a weather change and a change in effective albedo for the big picture. Would those changes be good anyway? I don't know, but don't get on the case of these freaking cows in Denmark, when you plan to change nearly 2% of the Earth's surface yourself!

    I do have an engineering background, A.M. I just like to write polemically a lot because... lazy?

    .

    * Yes, mixed system units, but that's what you get sometimes. I gotta assume these are all ccf - compressed cubic feet, as we see on our gas bills. (With some standard delivery pressure used.)

    ** The writer of this paper notes that. He even does some calculations based on the solar being FREE, and still, not all pencils out to it making money.

    Replies: @Dmon

  • @epebble
    @Almost Missouri

    NPR is only reporting. You can see original data in places like:

    https://ourworldindata.org/electricity-mix

    Yes, it is true, bulk of renewables is hydro now. Gas is increasing and nuclear is not increasing (or increasing slowly). The news was meant to recognize the drop in fossil-based generation rather than advocate one form of generation over other. Interesting thing is, since China is the largest producer of electricity now (by GWh), and they are rapidly pushing renewables including solar and wind, the cost to generate kWh for renewables is below that for fuel burning generation. That will make the fuel-based generation slowly wither away by market forces.

    Replies: @Almost Missouri, @Jim Don Bob, @Dmon

    Interesting thing is, since China is the largest producer of electricity now (by GWh), and they are rapidly pushing renewables including solar and wind, the cost to generate kWh for renewables is below that for fuel burning generation.

    They’re China. They might say they’re rapidly pushing renewables, but they’re sneaky fu#ks.

    https://www.carbonbrief.org/chinas-construction-of-new-coal-power-plants-reached-10-year-high-in-2024/

    A “resurgence” in construction of new coal-fired power plants in China is “undermining the country’s clean-energy progress”, says a new joint report by the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA) and Global Energy Monitor (GEM).
    The country began building 94.5 gigawatts (GW) of new coal-power capacity and resumed 3.3GW of suspended projects in 2024, the highest level of construction in the past 10 years, according to the two thinktanks.

    https://ember-energy.org/countries-and-regions/china/

    38% of China’s electricity was generated from low-carbon sources in 2024, just below the global average of 41%.

    Despite this progress, fossil fuels still provided 62% of China’s electricity in 2024. Its per capita power sector emissions have risen to match those of Japan, which is roughly twice the global average. Coal generation reached a record high…
    China is also the world’s largest coal mine methane (CMM) emitter, and emissions from coal mining are rising.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    @Dmon

    Dmon, China can build all the coal plants they want to because,

    a) They are exempt from all Climate accords due to being a "poor backward developing country".

    and

    b) We own you people, so whaddya' gonna do about it?

    and

    c) "去你妈的, that's why!"

  • @Dr. Rock
    Trump is really blowing it!

    He had/has, a once in a lifetime chance to actually do something to fix this screwed-up country, and he is squandering it minute by minute.

    1- Subservience to Israel, and their jew activists in the US, are splitting this country in yet another giant fissure. It's become so blatantly obvious, and "in your face" that at least half of the Left hates Israel, and at least half of the Right wants to be done having them dictate so much US policy that it's hard to keep track of it all. Those two halves equal a plurality. THAT'S a MANDATE!

    2- For a so-called "Peace President", he is advocating waaay too much war. Iran, Venezuela, Syria, Yemen... and he hasn't helped end the Ukraine war at all; Quite the opposite. Moreover, this country is awash in domestic troubles, and that needs to be his focus, not all this never-ending international bullshit.

    3- The economy is NOT doing well, and he hasn't done anything to change that. The cost of living is still sky high, the housing market is a ridiculous joke. Sure, the stock market is soaring, but that doesn't help most Americans, at all. His spasmodic tariff policy hasn't helped anyone that makes less than $10 million a year, and I don't know if it helped them either. Prices are NOT down, for anything.

    4- The Deep State is undeterred, and he hasn't arrested anybody! Not for the various treasons, the covid sham, the covid vaccine sham, the 2020 election sham, the lawfare war against the Right, nobody! WTF is he waiting for?

    5- Election Integrity? Still a shitshow!

    6- He really blew it out his ass on the Epstein thing, which I'm sure is related to point #1 about Israel and the fucking jews!

    7- He hasn't cleaned out the FBI, the DOJ, the CIA, the State Department, USAID, or the giant DC swamp! He's doing exactly what he did first term, i.e. "Now they all work for me, so it'll be just fine".

    8- Deportation numbers are soft! Sure, there's a lot of "shock and awe", but the numbers are a drop in the bucket! Make it illegal to sell to them, rent to them, hire them, or provide them services- They'll deport themselves. At this rate, he won't even un-do the Biden Flood, much less solve the illegal immigration problem.

    9- Crime is still rampant in every big blue city! Why isn't he federalizing police forces, arresting Mayors, Police Chiefs, corrupt DA's, Governors for defying federal law? Everyone knows that most violent crime is blacks and third world immigrants, so fucking do something about it! Arrest a few State Governors, City Mayors, and pro-criminal DA's, and you'll see some results!

    10- Stop talking, and start acting! We saw this in his first term too- All the high profile tweets, statements, bloviating blowhard bullshit, eventually wears on the public, and they get sick of him. He needs to STFU, and start DOING some shit, not talking about it.

    11- Why have we all been hearing about all the shit George Soros, and now his son Alex, have been doing for DECADES, and yet, nobody ever does shit about it? Go arrest their fucking asses, perp walk them, and put them in Epstein's exact cell!

    12- Stop talking shit to every country on the planet, and either do something to work with them, or ignore them! Feuding with half the planet is just stupid and counter-productive. That includes China!

    13- Stop bragging about all these bullshit figures about "investments in America by foreign countries and foreign leaders"!! That is all a bunch of bullshit! And why do we need foreign investment? Aren't we the richest, most powerful country on the planet? Either bring back manufacturing, or STFU!

    14- Pam Bondi sucks, so does Kash Patel! They bitched out, just admit it! Covering up for Epstein, or all the crimes that happened in the past 10 years? Charlie Kirk assassination? It's just Biden that can talk, it isn't any real changes!


    Seriously, if he isn't going to face the jew problem, then nothing else fucking matters.

    He's a failure!

    Replies: @Rurik, @Achmed E. Newman, @Achmed E. Newman, @Mr. Anon

    OK, I said I would, Dr. Rock, so let’s DO this thing!

    1) Agreed. I think Trump is beholden in various ways. However, he leans MIGA over MAGA yet still.

    2) No argument. As with much I’ll write here, this problem is more Trump’s ego than his beliefs. Trump wants to be that “Blessed (are the)” peacemaker from the Bible. His ego says that all his experience wheeling and dealing will help him make peace in the whole world. Yeah, right…

    3) Disagree. The ruin in the economy has been baked in the cake (lots of discussion below and elsewhere in these threads before) for a long tie I don’t blame Trump one bit for not wanting to be the guy standing when the music stops, if he even understands this. I’m pretty sure your Scott Bessentts and such do. If he wasn’t spasmodic – as you rightly state – with the tariffs, they’d be great policy. We’ve been getting screwed in trade deals for a half century. Trump has used these as more of a wheeler-dealer carrot/stick thing. Business cannot depend on tariffs that change drastically on a monthly basis.

    Anyway, Trump’s BBB was just another big bust of the budget, but why start the more acute financial pain right now? Nothing else would get done in that case.

    4 and 14) I don’t agree completely anyway. He again picked the wrong people to work under him in this fight against the DS. However, he HAS exposed a WHOLE LOT. That’s a start. It does also indicate that Trump himself is at least NOT part of the DS, Epstein nonsense notwithstanding.

    Regarding the Kung Flu and the jab, well, this is about the only time Trump has been S-ingTFU about anything. He’d rather forget his being suckered. He really doesn’t like being suckered, but then too, he doesn’t like America and Americans being suckered – that’s a helpful trait for us.

    5) I wish I could remember where I read it, but I think there is some work being done. One thing I do remember – Trump is very attentive to the fact that illegal aliens count for apportionment, not to mention their being able to easily vote in some States.

    6) Agreed. Yes, that press conference was the first time I saw Trump not just BSing, but really lying like the worst of the politicians. However, though this Epstein thing could show the world Israeli influence and the extend of the Deep State, that he left it should not impede the work he’s doing.

    7) He’s working on it. Things take time. I don’t know why, though, Trump can’t play real hardball like the ctrl-left does. Pick deputies that are truly MAGA (hell, why not Matt Gaetz still?) If Kash, Bondie, et all, won’t do a man’s job, fire them, let the deputies run things, and wait for years, as the Senate keeps un-confirming his even hard-core nominations.

    8) Strong disagree. I’m not saying we’re on track for getting 50,000,000 illegals out of here, but Steven Miller and Tom Homan have indicated they want to ramp this up. The publicity has good and bad aspects to it, but I think, as a media guy, Trump wants the publicity. It does help self-deportations. No, we have a long way to go to get to 10,000 a day, steady, slow-burn, getting-it-done. That’s only 3 1/2 million yearly, but at a serious rate like that, self-deportations could come to multiple times that number!

    9) Strongly Disagree. With the exception of Washington, FS (Fderal Shithole) – and notice Trump only got on this because his young former employee got attacked (Trump often acts only when it’s personal, another flaw) – this is NOT the business of the Federal Gov’t. I like that Trump points it all out though. His job IS, however, to bring in whatever forces are needed to allow ICE to do its job. This includes arresting all who impede, be they Mayors or Governors, for that matter. (I’d LOVE to see it!)

    10) I get the sentiment here, Dr. Rock. However, as I’ve given examples of, sometimes Trump’s talking IS getting things changed. That deal at the WH with the President of S. Africa – just talk? Sure, but that was a powerful pro-White statement that helps others feel empowered to BE pro-White. (BTW, he also has called for ZERO non-White refugee count a few REAL refugees, White S. Africans allowed – we’ll see if he follows through…)

    How about his talk about the “Greatest con job in this history of the world”. For once, he was not bullshitting there. That Climate Calamity crap has been indeed just that. Has Trump stopped it in its tracks finally? The latest thing out of 5 Chinese researchers (no conflict of interest at all) is that the Gulf Stream is being degraded which will lower the temperature of Europe by 60 degrees – no, that’s only Fahrenheit, but just as damn stupid. The Artificial Stupidity converted T in C to T in F rather than converting ΔT in C to ΔT in F, but yeah, keep investing in AI, bitchez!. Peak Stupidity was all over this latest twist with discussion of the highly-suspect reliance on Holistic Climate modeling in our recent post Global Warming predicted to cause severe European Ice Age. It turns out that America’s Science Officer Dr. Spock has not lost his Vulcan mind after all.

    11) Agreed. That George Soros has not been assassinated by anyone yet shows the great level of restraint of people on the right. I just read where he was sponsoring “small boat” voyages into Europe. Fucker!

    12, 13) Agreed.

    Whew!!!

    • Agree: Almost Missouri, Dmon
  • @Mr. Anon
    @epebble

    Growing up in the 70s, I did not sense that the country was in decline. Everything seemed honky-dory to me. I remember 1975 - 1976 as an era of good feelings. People were anticipating the bicentennial. The music was great, the girls were pretty, and we were free. America was a great place to live, even with the gas-lines. Even the movies started to get less dystopic. Maybe America was in decline, but it could still be arrested. Even into the 80's this nation was salvageable, I think,. Maybe even into the 90's.

    I can't exactly remember the first time I sensed that we were totally f**ked, but it was probably in the 00's sometime. Maybe it was the first time I noticed a pretty girl permanently disfigured by an ugly tattoo (clarification: they are all ugly). Maybe it was some particular news clip, hearing our chimp-in-chief, George W. Bush, mispronouncing some word or another in his retard-drawl while he was speechifying on TV. Maybe it was walking through some big-box store while some shitty rap "music" blared from the store sound system (clarification: all rap is shit).

    I don't remember the exact time or place, but clearly at some point it became obvious that the patient is terminal.

    Replies: @Mark G., @epebble

    chimp-in-chief, George W. Bush

    For me, the pits were watching ordinary industrial aluminum tubes being described as missile material and a small test tube of white something as WMDs (Weapons of Mass Destruction).

    Look at the skeptical look on the face of fellow delegates while listening to the obviously cooked up ‘evidence’. None other than France expressed their misgivings very publicly. France was ostracized for this defection.

    Compared to this dishonorable behavior, all the corruption surrounding pardons for money scam and two decades old pedophilia are small potatoes.

    • Agree: Dmon
    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
    @epebble

    Ah yes, I remember the "aluminum tubes" and thinking it strange at the time - the implication that aluminum tubes could only have but one purpose - that of enriching uranium. And let's not for get the phony yellow-cake letter that was signed by a government official who was no longer even in office. And then there were Colin Powell's cartoon drawings of mobile chemical weapons labs and Don Rumsfeld's cartoon drawings of Al Qaeda's secret mountain redoubts in Afghanistan.

    The recently deceased President, Dick Cheney, also did his fair share of lying in the service of enmeshing the United States in decades of war, not just the Invasion of Iraq in 2003, but also during the Gulf War in 1990/1991.

    https://corbettreport.com/the-dark-legacy-of-dick-cheney/

    The safest and wisest course of action when listening to a government official make official pronouncements, especially on matters of war, is to assume that he is lying to you.

  • @YetAnotherAnon
    @Hypnotoad666

    When the Longbridge car plant closed in Birmingham, UK around 15 years ago there was much talk of the economically more opportune jobs the workers could do. Fifteen years on the area is an economic dead zone.

    Thing is the Japanese and Chinese don't practise free trade. Strictly a one way street as far as they're concerned.

    Replies: @Dmon

    Yup. Particularly China – the only reason they’ll buy anything from you is to copy it and sell it cheaper. I’ve been hearing about all the jobs free trade is going to bring for the last 40 years, and I haven’t seen any of them show up yet.

    • Agree: deep anonymous
    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    @Dmon

    I can't do a whole string of [Agreee]s, but yes, this is the case. Not only that, but in response to A.M. and YAA regarding the British products, the Chinese don't play fair even if the official tariff rates and deals sound fair.

    I could tell you all yet again about the shipping container of face masks rejected by the German customer that went all the way back to China but got held up for many months at the docks in Shenzhen. They thought that was imported goods... ooops, who knew, we're just Chinese government officials?

    Your reply to Buzz is a very good point too, and thank you Buzz for that great summary of the energy situation. ePebble might be in the world of 1979 and Three-mile Island. Nobody died - it was just a time to get movies made, songs sung, and all the rest of that anti-nuke-power campaign going that shut down new production of reactors in this country for almost half a century, while the Chinese took the lead. Yet, I get by there quite a bit, and those reactors on the Susquehanna River in Harrisburg, Penn keep going and going and going, like some kind of explosive Lithium-addled bunny! (That doesn't even make sense about the bunny - he oughta get pretty sedate.)

  • @Buzz Mohawk
    @epebble


    Obviously, they become even more efficient if solar/wind/hydro power is used for charging.
     
    This is where you lose the efficiency argument, and for two reasons:

    1) Solar/wind/hydro power is very, very limited and cannot replace oil/gas or nuclear as electricity-generating systems.

    2) The conversion, transmission and charging is a huge loss seldom accounted for. Not to mention those very heavy batteries and the long recharging times. To put it simply, for midwits, the electricity for electric cars has to come from somwhere, and most of it comes from bunring oil or gas in powerplants -- and the transmission of that power to your plug-in car involves yet another loss in efficiency.

    If is very hard to be more efficient and powerful than simply refining oil and pumping the product into my car's tank in a minute or two.

    Electric vehicles are a marvel now, but they are very poor replacements for the very efficient, very quick, very clean engine-powered vehicles we all drive and enjoy.

    Now, if you can develop a more complete, comprehensive NUCLEAR power foundation for transportation and electrical energy, then folks like me will listen to you. Unfortunately, nuclear power has been attached and shunned half my life the the very same forces that have attacked and shunned my people and my true, actual nation.

    You know, the nation I am not allowed to have.

    If you want electric cars, then give me the nuclear power to charge them.

    Replies: @Dmon, @epebble, @A123

    Yes, agree with everything you said. I would add that solar/wind for power plants is actually less efficient than just using gas, because they have to keep a gas backup going all the time (in case the wind stops blowing).

    • Replies: @James B. Shearer
    @Dmon

    "Yes, agree with everything you said. I would add that solar/wind for power plants is actually less efficient than just using gas, because they have to keep a gas backup going all the time (in case the wind stops blowing)."

    I don't think this is accurate. As I understand it two of the virtues of gas power plants is that they can be easily throttled up or down to match demand and that capital costs are relatively low. So they pair well with intermittent sources like sun or wind. When the sun is shining or the wind is blowing you throttle down the gas plant and save a lot on fuel costs. Otherwise you let the gas plant handle the demand. Because the capital cost of the gas plant is low there is less need to keep it running at full power as much as possible.

  • @Almost Missouri
    @Dmon

    Do electric cars really burn more than petroleum cars? Or do we just hear about it more because it's a bit of a novelty?

    Replies: @epebble, @Dmon, @Achmed E. Newman

    I don’t know if they burn more. But when they do burn, it’s almost impossible to put out, so everything around them goes up to.

    • Agree: Achmed E. Newman
    • Replies: @deep anonymous
    @Dmon

    Several years ago, a Tesla was trying to beat a yellow-to-red light, making a left turn while doing so. The driver failed to make it and his car ended up in a berm/median strip. He got out just before the car burst into flames. The Baltimore County FD responded but was unable to put the fire out. The car and surrounding vegetation burnt to a crisp.

    , @Jim Don Bob
    @Dmon

    Lithium battery fires cannot be put out with water. Usually foam is employed to stop the oxygen.

    There was a recent fire in a battery recycling plant that burned for days.

    Insurance companies are looking at raising rates at garages that allow EVs. EV insurance rates are already higher than IC cars. I won't mention depreciation.

    At least two cargo ships have been lost in the past 3(?) years when a fire broke out in the battery of an EV car.

  • @epebble
    @Hypnotoad666

    If they allow BYD and other Chinese EVs, it is game over for U.S. auto industry. This is what Ford's CEO says about Chinese auto industry:


    Farley is also sounding the alarm about Chinese competitors. Last week, Farley told CBS Sunday Morning Chinese car companies pose an “existential threat” and have the capacity to take over the North American market and put homegrown automakers out of business.


    https://fortune.com/2025/11/11/ford-ceo-jim-farley-shocking-discovery-chinese-electric-vehicles-model-e-brutal-business-decision/
     
    It will be like consumer electronics. When did you last buy a U.S. made television? And if the new affordable EVs replace gas vehicles, millions of workers at service stations, auto mechanics etc., will go out of business. Also, think of impact on oil industry.

    Replies: @A123, @OilcanFloyd, @Dmon, @Hypnotoad666

    If they allow BYD and other Chinese EVs, it is game over for U.S. auto industry.

    I’m all for protecting U.S. industries, as long as what they produce is worth buying, they work in the best intetests of the nation, and the corporations stay out of social politics. Why not? We spent the last 60 years exporting capital and technology to China to build the industries that now sell everything to us. Where would they be without our assistance and monetary aid? The U.S. government and corporations pretty much protected Chinese industries at the expense of U.S. industries. That may not fall under the legal definition of treason, but what else is it?

    • Agree: Achmed E. Newman, Dmon
    • Thanks: Mike Tre
    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    @OilcanFloyd

    That's the theology of neoliberal capitalism.

  • The debate about online anonymity is silly. Posting under a pseudonym is the online equivalent of giving an opinion in confidence or talking off the record. Besides, the speech codes that we live under are the problem, not the fact that many people don’t want the hassle of dealing with the idiots and enforcers who embrace and enforce the codes.

    When a good chunk of the nation has incredibly stupid opinions and irrational, or even violent, emotional responses to the subjects of race, crime, immigration, ethnic politics, Israel, history, and many other topics, that make discussion impossible, most people don’t discuss the topics in the open.

    If you think you can discuss anything with anyone without consequences, just go to a street corner in any black community and talk honestly about race, or to a Jewish neighborhood and try to discuss the holocaust, Israel, or Jewish issues from the view of an outsider, and see what happens. Just having differing views on hispanic crime or influence is a bridge too far for some. The push to end anonymous speech is mostly about shutting down free speech and punishing certain opinions.

    • Agree: Almost Missouri, Dmon
    • Replies: @Pericles
    @OilcanFloyd

    Pseudonyms have a long history in the US so one may wonder at the demands being made.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_pseudonyms_used_in_the_American_Constitutional_debates

    , @Buzz Mohawk
    @OilcanFloyd

    Man, that's a good comment, Floyd.

    Ever since this stupid argument began, with all its examples and philosophies, I have wanted to say just this:

    Do you think American Citizens should not vote in private?

    As in, do you think that American Citizens should not vote anonymously?

    Think about it. We all vote privately. No one is supposed to know how you or I vote.

    That is the equivalent of anonymity, and it has been part of the bedrock of our American, muh, "democracy."

    Do those of you who propose ending online anonymity also want to end anonymous voting? Do you want my every vote to be accompanied by my fucking name?

    Well, then, fuck you. You are either idiots or evil or both. Fuck you.

    Anonymity goes all the way back to founders like Ben Franklin, who wrote under pseudonyms.

    Rather than being a bug, anonymity is a feature. It allows us to freely express ourselves. Any attempt to end it is, very clearly, an attempt to end our ability to freely express ourselves. Full stop.

    I just enjoyed a fresh loaf of graham bread baked by my wife, hot out of her oven! (Yes, that's sexy.) We drank Tokaj wine from her ancestral homeland. With this, we ate her meatballs of ground, organic chicken breasts and ground pork tenderloin. This all was after we watched a hilarious podcast by Ian Carroll.

    Have any of you even ever had graham bread, or fresh meatballs made with organic chicken breasts and pork tenderloin?

    We are working on our Thanksgiving menu...

    Replies: @James B. Shearer, @kaganovitch

  • @Hypnotoad666
    @epebble


    And if the new affordable (Chinese) EVs replace gas vehicles, millions of workers at service stations, auto mechanics etc., will go out of business. Also, think of impact on oil industry.
     
    That could be true. But all the money Americans save from not buying those items, they will spend on other (mostly American) products, creating new jobs to make those things.

    Plus, the dollars we send to China for the electric cars will eventually also have to come back to buy American goods, creating more American jobs. (If those dollars never come back to buy American stuff then we would be getting the cars for free, which would be an even better deal for us).

    So free trade is normally a good deal in the aggregate. But as you say, it can still dislocate and cause a lot of pain to the people in the industries that get offshored. So I guess that's the real tradeoff.

    Replies: @Almost Missouri, @YetAnotherAnon, @Dmon

    Plus, the dollars we send to China for the electric cars will eventually also have to come back to buy American goods, creating more American jobs.

    There should be lots of new jobs for firemen.

    https://ctif.org/news/burning-ship-carrying-lithium-ev-cars-sank-outside-azores
    https://www.motorbiscuit.com/electric-fire-truck-burns-down-fire-station/
    https://www.popsci.com/technology/an-abandoned-ship-full-of-evs-is-burning-in-the-pacific/

    • Replies: @Almost Missouri
    @Dmon

    Do electric cars really burn more than petroleum cars? Or do we just hear about it more because it's a bit of a novelty?

    Replies: @epebble, @Dmon, @Achmed E. Newman

  • @epebble
    @Mark G.

    that particular house has an estimated market value of $465,000

    While it is common to see people ascribing 'inflation' as the common cause for high house prices, there is another factor - productivity - that is not discussed much. For example, in that house's case, probably, land is plentiful in Indiana and should not have risen by a factor of 35 times (3,500%) in 65 years. So, that leaves (lack of) productivity growth for building cost inflation. They are building houses almost same way in 2025 as in 1960 (plus, may be, new amenities). If there were a serious effort to greatly increase productivity - say by standardizing on high quality easily assemblable modules - costs would not have risen astronomically and families could be affordably living. Federal government spends many billions on new carriers for 'national defense' but no one thinks helping the nation continue is 'national defense' too! Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has multibillion dollar budget, most of which is transfer payments to public housing and rent assistance (Section 8). I have never heard of any R & D to make houses better or more affordable. We still lose homes to fires and storms as though it is 19th century when we can build Space Station in outer space!

    Replies: @Mark G., @Mr. Anon, @James B. Shearer, @deep anonymous, @Dmon

    They are not building houses today like they did in 1960. You don’t see union carpenters sawing wood to fit on site, or plumbers custom fitting cast iron pipes and cutting the threads with hand dies. You see illegal aliens using nail guns to put up pre-assembled walls with studs on 24″ centers, not professionals using hammers to nail in full 2″ studs on 16 inch centers. Conflating in a comment from Mr. Anon about drywalling over potential access points to utilities, in 1960 they probably wouldn’t even have used drywall – I’ve lived in houses built in the late 50’s, and they used plaster and lath. Not to mention that, speaking of utilities, alot of houses back then had one bathroom and one (or maybe two) ungrounded electrical outlets per room. Nowadays, alot of new plumbing is PEX. If it’s not PEX, it’s copper, and either way, they’re using crimped fittings, not soldering. Drain pipes are plastic. Houses have at least two bathrooms, often more, and every room has an outlet about every 2 feet (exaggeration for effect).

    All that being said, there are limits to how much they can change the basic building approach of a house. A large part of that is codes. When you buy a house, you would like a certain degree of confidence that it will not collapse, get blown over, or release phosgene gas when it bursts into flames. Much of that confidence stems from the knowledge that your house was built in substantially the same way as all those other houses built 60 years ago that haven’t fallen down yet. If you come up with a brand new way of constructing a house, and anything goes wrong at any time later, you will get sued to oblivion. If you stick with the standard way of doing things, you are generally OK as long as you pass all your inspections.

    And James B. Shearer is substantially correct on the land cost as well. Consider a place like California. New home construction is essentially $200/sq ft. You can buy an up-to-code prefab home, have it delivered and assembled, and the ultimate cost will be around $160/sq ft. There is really only so much that can be saved in the construction, unless they start using lego blocks. But even at $150/sq ft, you cannot get a new $300,000 home anywhere in California that you would want to live (even if you want to live out in the boonies, they won’t let you build there).

    • Agree: epebble
  • @epebble
    @Hypnotoad666

    If they allow BYD and other Chinese EVs, it is game over for U.S. auto industry. This is what Ford's CEO says about Chinese auto industry:


    Farley is also sounding the alarm about Chinese competitors. Last week, Farley told CBS Sunday Morning Chinese car companies pose an “existential threat” and have the capacity to take over the North American market and put homegrown automakers out of business.


    https://fortune.com/2025/11/11/ford-ceo-jim-farley-shocking-discovery-chinese-electric-vehicles-model-e-brutal-business-decision/
     
    It will be like consumer electronics. When did you last buy a U.S. made television? And if the new affordable EVs replace gas vehicles, millions of workers at service stations, auto mechanics etc., will go out of business. Also, think of impact on oil industry.

    Replies: @A123, @OilcanFloyd, @Dmon, @Hypnotoad666

    Chinese EVs still have a couple of bugs to be worked out.

    https://cnevpost.com/2024/09/29/byd-recalls-evs-fire-risk/BYD (HKG: 1211,

    OTCMKTS: BYDDY) is recalling nearly 100,000 electric vehicles (EVs) in one of its rare recall moves.

    The new energy vehicle (NEV) maker will recall 96,714 Dolphin and Yuan Plus vehicles in China starting September 30, 2024, due to a risk of fire, according to a statement on China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) website today.

  • Here's a new Open Thread for everyone. For those interested, here are my most recent articles: Donald Trump as Our Mad Emperor of the Bubble Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 13, 2025 • 3,000 Words John Charmley and the Story of Winston Churchill Ron Unz • The Unz Review • October 20,...
  • I have some very unfortunate news to relay to you all: the person whose handle is The Germ Theory of Disease has been transferred to hospice care having suffered at least two strokes last week and is not expected to survive more than a few days. Having known him for a couple of decades and enjoyed his company immensely despite his various craziness, I very much hope that last part isn’t true.

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @slumber_j

    Well, fuck.

    , @OilcanFloyd
    @slumber_j

    That's terrible news! I wish him well.

    , @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @slumber_j

    Appreciate the update slumber_j, if you personally know him it’s got to be especially tough to take.

    Germ Theory—you’re a good one, you lived life to the limit (was there another choice? nah), and you always brought bonhomie despite some ‘barstool’ ribbing: There will always be a seat saved for you here.

    , @Buzz Mohawk
    @slumber_j

    Please give him our regards if you can. Let him know we are thinking of him. Thank you.

    I wish we could play all his favorite music for him and tell him funny stories...

    , @Mr. Anon
    @slumber_j

    I am sorry to hear that. He was always cheerful and good natured, unlike a lot of people here (like me).

    , @epebble
    @slumber_j

    As was mentioned, he had mentioned losing his brother just three months back. Such are the vagaries of fate.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ty7J0IjF9NI

    P.S. If there is any cultural reference to his handle, I am curious to know. I am not plugged into popular culture as he is, reading his last comment was about Sydney Sweeney, whose existence I was unaware of.

    Replies: @MEH 0910, @MEH 0910

    , @deep anonymous
    @slumber_j

    Terrible news that he is so gravely ill. I will pray for him.

    , @Corpse Tooth
    @slumber_j

    Germ was a gifted storyteller. I'll miss his contributions.

    Replies: @Almost Missouri, @Curle

    , @Hail
    @slumber_j

    I've tried to reached out to Steve Sailer to tell him of the news about Germ Theory.

    The Germ Theory of Disease was one of Sailer's best quality commenters (read that as "best-quality" or "best, quality" as you wish). It looks like over 8,000 comments between November 2018 and October 2025, a large number of which are practically suitable to have been blog-posts in their own right.

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman

    , @Charlotte
    @slumber_j

    I’m sorry to hear that. Always enjoyed his commentary.

    , @vinteuil
    @slumber_j


    ...the person whose handle is The Germ Theory of Disease has been transferred to hospice care having suffered at least two strokes last week and is not expected to survive more than a few days.
     
    I.e., "the person whose handle was The Germ Theory of Disease" has tired of the Unz Review & moved on to greener pastures.

    He's a talented writer - I'll grant him that.

    Replies: @vinteuil, @Corvinus

  • @Mike Tre
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Arnny was my big action hero when I was a kid - I was 10 when Commando came out and I thought it was the greatest movie ever. I can STILL watch it today because it is so unbelievably campy that it's just pure comedy at this point (think: the scene where he flings skillsaw blades around like Chinese stars and hacks a bunch of soldiers to death with garden tools) The Australian bad guy, Bennett, is absolute gold. Has there ever been a guy having more fun playing a bad guy role? He should have got a nomination for BSA, and the sad thing is I never remember seeing that actor in anything ever again.

    Anyway, the unbelievable thing is how well all of his old action movies from the 80's have managed to age. (conversely, rewatch the LOtR trilogy and realize how awful it actually was) Predator is a legit classic. Total Recall (red pill/blue pill dichotomy a decade before The Matrix), Conan, the Terminator, True Lies, and Red Heat (pretty much 48 hours but with Soviet/American partners and the same supporting actors and musical score) are all still very watchable. Even his comedy flicks are amusing from that era.

    This is a relatively newer channel on yt but I enjoy it for nostalgic reasons:

    https://youtu.be/O96g3Lf8298?si=QcmVqPquAZUFb3Vb

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Curle, @Dmon

    “The Australian bad guy, Bennett, is absolute gold. Has there ever been a guy having more fun playing a bad guy role? He should have got a nomination for BSA, and the sad thing is I never remember seeing that actor in anything ever again.”

    If you ever saw the original Road Warrior from the ’80s, he was the big skinhead biker who road around with a little boytoy on the back of his bike. Max (Mel Gibson) finally killed him with a head-on collision as he was trying to climb up the front of the semi Max was driving. Speaking of great action movies, that’s one of the best, even though the basic plot is ridiculous (people in post-nuclear apocalypse Australia spend all day riding around on motorcycles and in old hot rods trying to ambush strangers with gas who might come by once a month or so).

    • Thanks: Mike Tre
    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
    @Dmon


    Speaking of great action movies, that’s one of the best, even though the basic plot is ridiculous (people in post-nuclear apocalypse Australia spend all day riding around on motorcycles and in old hot rods trying to ambush strangers with gas who might come by once a month or so).
     
    Yeah, how much gas did they burn up trying to get hold of gas? It was kind of silly.

    Some movies are great on style but make no sense on plot. Like The Usual Suspects - an original, clever, and entertaining movie, but the plot really makes no sense. The master criminal blackmails some career criminals into killing the only person who can identify him, and then spends several hours regaling a whole police-station full of cops with made up tales, so that now dozens of cops know exactly what he looks like.

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican

  • @Emil Nikola Richard
    @YetAnotherAnon

    Is he the one who thought negroes were stupid or was that the other guy?

    Replies: @Dmon, @MEH 0910

    Him and about 80% of humanity.

  • @epebble
    @Dmon

    Mother Gaia continues to show her favor to The Human Beings by punishing those who would steal the bounty from her people

    Beyond Meat was over $200 in 2019. Now it is less than $2. TESLA Shareholders, take note.

    Replies: @Dmon

    Right idea, different ungulate. Beyond Meat consisted of buffalo farts, whereas when the Klimate Katastrophists get their way, Teslas and all other electrical appliances will be powered by unicorn farts.

    • Thanks: Achmed E. Newman
    • LOL: Currdog73
    • Replies: @epebble
    @Dmon

    Unicorns are not helping Ford. The bestselling (Electric) truck couldn't make it once the (rebate) plug was pulled.


    Ford reportedly considers ending production of all-electric F-150 Lightning

    Ford Motor is reportedly considering permanently ending production of its all-electric F-150 Lightning pickup truck amid mounting losses and more challenging market conditions for EVs.

    The Wall Street Journal first reported the talks Thursday, adding that they are ongoing and nothing has been finalized.

    A source familiar with Ford’s product plans confirmed to CNBC that the company has been evaluating its future EV plans amid the company’s losses and changing market conditions.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2025/11/06/ford-f-150-lightning-ev.html
     
    This may be the fate of all non-Tesla EVs. Tesla can run for a while based on momentum as long as they are protected from imports.
  • @Buzz Mohawk
    @Achmed E. Newman

    "Sky High" is a great song. I also very much like the band Chicago, for example, "25 or 6 to 4."


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8A3HZvGN0qs&list=RD8A3HZvGN0qs&start_radio=1


    BTW, my implied criticism of Jimmy Buffett was only implied, and what I really was saying was that I don't know his work much other than "Margaritaville." (Then I remembered "Cheeseburger in Paradise," and I thought, well, maybe I'm not wrong...)

    Your example of his ex-pat song is very good, though. I must admit. Thanks.

    Replies: @Dmon, @Achmed E. Newman

    I can take or leave most of Jimmy Buffet’s songs, but he definitely had the best song titles : “Weather’s Here, Wish You Were Beautiful”, “If The Phone Doesn’t Ring It’s Me”. And of course,

    • Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Dmon

    “Weather’s Here, Wish You Were Beautiful” reasonably explains the “Get Drunk” conditional of the posted track. Right up there with “Her Face Had A Bilge Hole”.

  • @Achmed E. Newman
    @Dmon

    LOL! cause "farting up a storm". Yes, the perfect storm.

    OTOH, I gotta say, even I'm a little put out by this obvious display of your inherent Settlerism, Mr. Dmon. I'll have you know that the Indigenous People were extremely environmentally conscious. The particular Indigenous Peoples who had conquered the Great Plains during the time in question used every part of the Ta'Tonka, that which you erroneously call the "Buffalo". Along with the hide, the meat, and the bones, they made use of the farts too. Fart jerky, fart gumbo, deep-fried Ta'Tonka farts... you name it... nothing was wasted.

    Mother Gaia was much pleased. She rewarded The People with horses, rifles, and casinos.

    Replies: @Dmon

    Mother Gaia continues to show her favor to The Human Beings by punishing those who would steal the bounty from her people and sell Buffalo fart products without paying royalties.

    https://www.thestreet.com/restaurants/creditsafe-flags-chapter-11-bankruptcy-risk-for-beyond-meat

    Analyst: Beyond Meat faces Chapter 11 bankruptcy as cash dwindles

    • Replies: @epebble
    @Dmon

    Mother Gaia continues to show her favor to The Human Beings by punishing those who would steal the bounty from her people

    Beyond Meat was over $200 in 2019. Now it is less than $2. TESLA Shareholders, take note.

    Replies: @Dmon