Together with the W hotel, the Barcelona waterfront is dominated by the same three tall buildings for over 30 years.
In comparison, more than 3 or 4 dozen skyscrapers have been built near the Bund waterfront in Shanghai since the turn of the century, especially in Pudong where there were only rice fields 30 years ago.
This is such a dumb comparison. The 3 buildings in Barcelona are already too many. Shanghai may be an amazing modern city, but it will never be as beautiful as Barcelona. Even average European cities are more beautiful.
That's OK with me.
Even average European cities are more beautiful.
I was absolutely gobsmacked when I recently heard (from either Douglas McGregor or Lawrence Wilkerson) that Trump’s net wealth has significantly increased. I thought just the opposite, that he had taken a major hit.
All this bitching at and about Donald J. Trump is absolutely without any discernible beneficial effect on him or his sycophants or his fan base. Its utter futility has to wear-down those who do so much of it, though.
Replies: @Constant Walker, @theRealHun, @Titus7, @Robert Bruce
As of late 2025, Donald Trump's net worth is estimated to be approximately $7.3 billion. This figure represents a significant increase from previous years, largely due to his involvement in the technology and cryptocurrency sectors.
Shitcoin scams make a lot of money for the chosen few.
Blacks only got into power thanks to the Jews, but Jared Taylor refuses to ever mention the Jewish factor in blacks getting into power. That’s why, with the idiots at American Renaissance in charge of white nationalism, nothing will ever change, because they won’t ever dare attack the Jews who are putting these blacks into power.
Trump wants a Nobel prize and judging by his recent statements, feels that Netanyahu is not ‘providing the goods’ — a feeling of disillusion that is reciprocated in the Israeli Prime Minister’s office.
How many times do we need to go through this “Trump is upset with Netanyahu” charade? I recall, the last time that Trump was allegedly “upset with Netanyahu” and “turning away from Israel,” the next day they conducted a preemptive attack on Iran (with Trump’s full complicity and support) that became the so-called “12 day war.” This sort of thing has happened at least five or six times, where the media seeds a story of Trump being “upset with Netanyahu” only for him to confirm his total devotion to both Netanyahu and Israel shortly after. It is plausible deniability, misdirection, etc. They have done the same thing with Trump being “upset with Zelensky” (meanwhile, “Putin’s puppet” Trump just signed another billion dollars or so for Zelensky just the other day).
As many times as necessary to corral the MAGA maggots and further delude them into believing their kosher shaman is an independent player. Fat, stupid, arrogant sheep get sheared every time!!
How many times do we need to go through this “Trump is upset with Netanyahu” charade?
I don’t do drugs at all. What I know about this is from Italian cops and some guys who came from Morocco with a bag of that stuff.
In the 2000’s too.
If Morocco is prospering, God bless them.
Maybe muslims can go there instead of colonizing the west.
Experienced residents of both countries can largely avoid the omnipresent scams. But low-trust societies have deep-set problems. It is the major factor that worries me about Morocco, an otherwise highly attractive country that may be the best place to live in Africa.Replies: @Felpudinho, @theRealHun, @Anonymous, @Jim H
"Viveza criolla" is Spanish language phrase literally meaning "creole vivacity" and may be translated as "creole cleverness" or "creole cunning."
It is a philosophy of progress along the line of least resistance, ignoring rules, and with no sense of responsibility or consideration for others. It extends to all social groups and throughout the entirety of society. In Argentina, it is predominantly associated with Buenos Aires and its inhabitants, the porteños.
It includes the tendency to take advantage of or cheat others in favor of one's own self-interests, partially for reasons of self-protection and mistrust, but also to assert one's superiority and "quick-wittedness" over another.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viveza_criolla
…Morocco has an unshakable reputation as a haven of beggars, hustlers and tricksters, who regard their swindles and cons as admirable shakedowns of naive foreign tourists.
In this, Morocco reminds me of Argentina, with which I’m somewhat more familiar…
I was in Morocco for six weeks straight and in Argentina twice for about two to three months each. There is no comparison between the two countries: Argentina is a genuine pleasure to visit, a large, attractive, country full of vivacious men and women, while Morocco is a scamming, cheating, overall desert shit hole where the Muslim feels free to rob, cheat, and steal from the supposedly “inferior infidel” (check with what the Quran has to say about it).
There’s a reason that when the main Moroccan Airline handed out a questioner to passengers returning from Morocco to Europe as the whether they’d return for a second visit, 95% of the respondents said “no.” That’s 19 tourists out of 20 who, after their first shitty visit to shitty Morocco, decided that one visit to Morocco in a lifetime was one visit too many.
I never went back to Morocco. I wouldn’t visit that Muslim dump even if I was given a free ticket, while I’d return to Argentina in a heartbeat on my own dime.
For normal Western people, Morocco is good if you want to go there for 2 weeks during the height of winter, see whatever cultural sites, and maybe go to some spots designated for Westerners where you can have a drink and chill. No to re-locate as a Westerner (unless you want to re-invent yourself and become a Muslim).
Moroccans ARE HIGHLY criminal in Europe. Old migrants AND recent migrants.
50% of all moroccans in Netherlands are criminals.
https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/mohadesa-najumi/dutch-racism_b_9659886.html
https://kern.pundicity.com/10785/moroccan-crime-netherlands
MOST european cocaine is traficked by MOROCCANS, with the accompanying violence and murder.
They are literally called the MOCRO mafia.
80% of all criminal searches in germany are Moroccans and other arabs
https://www.achrichten.com
AgreeAnd don't forget all those welfare-for life Turks, their sons often turnout criminal. Not to nitpick, but your sentence would be much more accurate if you had written: "80% of all criminal searches in Germany are Moroccans and other MUSLIMS." As for Brussels, a 35%-Muslim city packed with Moroccans, your 80% criminal number for Moroccans would be about right. In Brussels Moroccans are the cause of almost all the violence and criminality. As productive, own-weight-pulling, contributors to society, most Moroccan immigrants are pure shit. Yet here they are in Brussels, pumping out all the brand-spanking-new babies who are immediately supported by Western welfare for life.The center will not hold. The day of reckoning will come to Brussels much sooner than in other large cities in the West. There will, no doubt, be blood. But I figure that day won't come before April, and by then we'll be gone from Brussels for good. Thank God.Replies: @selfdo59
80% of all criminal searches in germany are Moroccans and other arabs
Mossad isn’t omnipotent. It’s a powerful myth invented by a jewish marketing department.
Experienced residents of both countries can largely avoid the omnipresent scams. But low-trust societies have deep-set problems. It is the major factor that worries me about Morocco, an otherwise highly attractive country that may be the best place to live in Africa.Replies: @Felpudinho, @theRealHun, @Anonymous, @Jim H
"Viveza criolla" is Spanish language phrase literally meaning "creole vivacity" and may be translated as "creole cleverness" or "creole cunning."
It is a philosophy of progress along the line of least resistance, ignoring rules, and with no sense of responsibility or consideration for others. It extends to all social groups and throughout the entirety of society. In Argentina, it is predominantly associated with Buenos Aires and its inhabitants, the porteños.
It includes the tendency to take advantage of or cheat others in favor of one's own self-interests, partially for reasons of self-protection and mistrust, but also to assert one's superiority and "quick-wittedness" over another.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viveza_criolla
Argentina is thousand times better than Morocco.
Can I proselytize (Morocco is too Muslim and needs diversity)? What if I bring 10,000 of my friends and demand equal rights? Can I get gibs in Morocco like Moroccans demand and get in Europe?
Spain is building one
Building one? Their high speed rail network is already the best and largest in Europe and 2nd largest in the world after China.
Yeah Trump mostly reminds me of Nasser in the priority he gives to building up repressive capacity to lead a longer-term top-down revolution, and in his personality statecraft based on new national affiliations. Also like Nasser, CIA doesn’t like him and would go to almost any length to remove him (recall they scuttled the Liberty – Operation Cyanide – as a pretext for war on Egypt (their Izzies got carried away and fucked it up tho so no war.)
The classical comparison that grabs me most is the phenomenon Tacitus observed, that in the course of degeneration Roman factional conflicts became more pitched and desperate because increasing absolutism and overreach meant that the victors could destroy the losers. That’s US politics now, two indistinguishable cooperative political machines fighting to the death.
But I’m really tired of hearing our Constitutional system is hanging by a thread. You haven’t had a constitution for 76 years. It’s gone, you’re not getting it back. Section 201 shitcanned it and CIA took over with cursory cosmetic window dressing. They don’t mind Trump’s arbitrary conduct because it can’t touch them and it’s more precedent for their own impunity.
We haven’t had one since the inauguration of Lincoln.
You haven’t had a constitution for 76 years.
Caligula ordered a statue of himself to be erected within the Jew’s temple in Jerusalem. Jews resisted this decree of the Emperor. 10 to 1 they were behind his assassination, because this project ended with his death. Every major anti-Semite of history or warrior against Jewry (Haman, Antiochus Epiphanes, Caligula, Nero, Crowley, Hitler, Rockwell) the Jews will defame after their death with absurd scurrilous fabrications.
Heads up 😄
Scorpions are almost everywhere. I live in Europe and we have scorpions here.
Penang is not bad. If he is there, he chose well. Much better than anywhere in Africa.
Between Anglin peddling a bunch of retarded conspiracies that have little to no evidence whatsoever and his never-ending antagonism towards people like Nick Fuentes, I’m honestly starting to lose all desire to continue reading his schizophrenic content anymore.
The whole “hurr fuentes is a fed” bullshit genuinely has zero evidence to corroborate it beyond the demented ravings of some scorned former associates and the resentful wishes of the old guard of the dead ‘alt-right’. But Anglin will not only peddle this horseshit coincidently alongside other notoriously sly and deceptive figures, but he’ll actually double down on it and make asinine claims about having knowledge that proves it despite this being completely ridiculous. Are you a clairvoyant, Anglin? Or perhaps you yourself work for spooks? Is that the take away here?
No, this is all just pathetic. Nick Fuentes has shoved many of the most taboo topics straight into the minds of generation z and straight into the mainstream. He’s managed to do what many of us have been trying to do but with little to no success. Yet, the retarded and bitter among us would rather tear it all down over their refusal to believe that his approach could’ve possibly worked than be happy that these topics we’ve been desperately carrying for decades are now gaining ground in the mainstream and fast.
For the meantime, I’m with Fuentes, not Anglin. Why? Because Fuentes is focusing on getting awareness out there by any means necessary. Is he perfect? Hell no. But he’s all we’ve got and he’s doing a damn good job so far.
Those pesky Russians, they are everywhere, aren’t they? Manipulating elections, running propaganda campaigns in media, propping up people friendly to them, while destroying everybody who dares to criticize them, selling bagels everywhere, causing wars all around the world…
this is where Anglin has ended up. "Everything I don't like is controlled opposition, and antisemites are the real jews."Replies: @Anon, @Hulkamania
antisemitism has become so mainstream that you need a controlled opposition antisemite to be plastered everywhere, Fuentes is the best you’re going to do
Yeah it’s pretty sad to watch. He’s become very low-IQ and having some kind of mid-life crisis over not getting the amount of donations he wanted.
The Nick stuff is just exhausting. He’s doing a sleight of hand here where he wants to belittle Nick but not acknowledge him at the same time.
Nick is “out of the media” when he just had his biggest interview ever 4 days ago. But it’s unimportant to Andy so he just ignores how it’s obviously contradictory to his feelings.
Also Andy seems to be repeating the “Nick is a fed because he didn’t get arrested for 1/6th” narrative now, but Andrew didn’t turn on Nick until 2023. So there’s a couple years that Andy apparently supported a fed even after the event happened.
Andrew is just fundamentally an unfair pundit. Leaving the US was the best move he ever made because this single decision is the entire basis upon which is he supposed to be considered unimpeachable. I’m just not buying it anymore.
antisemitism has become so mainstream that you need a controlled opposition antisemite to be plastered everywhere, Fuentes is the best you’re going to do
this is where Anglin has ended up. “Everything I don’t like is controlled opposition, and antisemites are the real jews.”
Even if it were true that the first Soviet government was 85% Jewish, the point is moot unless you present primary evidence to support any relationship between their Jewish heritage/religion and their actions. The point is no more relevant that the fact that Stalin was a Georgian…
I stopped reading right here. No amount of evidence will ever prove that the eternally innocent victims could have done anything wrong at any point in history.
Trump wants Nobel Piss Prize. Not that the prize actually means anything given who got it in the past… Actually, maybe he is the right candidate. Never mind.
Allah is Yahweh. Neither version belongs in Europe.
Andrew Anglin:
“But mostly [Bannon] sticks to anti-Islam, because this just works better. He’s out there with that rat Taylor Marshall, who like Bannon, claims to be Catholic, but somehow has evangelical Christian views on Jews as the chosenest of all… and the true threat being Islam, even though no one can explain how they are a threat.”
Nobody can explain how Islam/Muslims is/are a threat?
LOL!
Come to Europe and see with your own eyes – it’ll only take a minute – how much the Muslims, by their very presence, have f-cked up once perfectly respectable, clean, safe and classical European cities and towns. When it comes to violence, welfare, and rabbit-pace breeding, Muslims are giving American blacks a run for their money. Though I admit Muslim men don’t pump-and-dump Muslim women the way blacks pump-and-dump their black women in the USA.
If I want to see the third world with its multitudes of third worlders I’ll go there. I don’t want to see the third world (blacks/browns/Muslims) when I go to Paris, Rome, London, Lisbon and Berlin; I want to see genuine French, Italian, English, Portuguese, and German people when I go to these European capitals, otherwise what’s the point in going there?
The Muslim threat is everywhere in Europe.
Fixed. Since you're in Europe, you may be excused for not knowing this.Portugal, right? I've spent time there recently and know what you mean. However in much of Europe sub-saharan Africans are taking over faster than Muslims ever did. That P&D thing you mention (and its saturation promotion in the media, aimed at white women) is part of the cause.https://i.ibb.co/g8Pn1fM/Screenshot-20251119-203328-Daily-Mail.jpgHow white women & men achieve happiness and fulfillment!
Though I admit Muslim men don’t pump-and-dump Muslim women the way blacks pump-and-dump theirblackwhite women in the USA.
Replies: @Felpudinho
If you’re in our places, you have to go back,
Anglin wants to see a defense of Fuentes here so as maybe an equal fan of both and not necessarily a “mugu” I’ll give it a shot as I find none of his arguments against Nick convincing (though I agree with him completely about Andrew Tate).
AFAIK, Anglin and Nick were on the same page regarding China and Russia. Nick changed his view and Anglin says this must mean he was paid off. Anglin admits he does not watch Nick’s show or interviews so he likely missed the multiple times that Nick explained why he changed his view. Nick’s position was that ZOG’s stranglehold over us had become unbreakable and the best we could hope for is for the US to lose it’s hegemony and hope China and Russia will side with the American people. This remains Anglin’s position, as I understand. Nick’s current view is that the Gaza genocide has changed the global situation to such an extent that taking the US back from ZOG is now back on the table, if not an inevitability. So in that case we would want the US to remain dominant or at least competitive with Russia/China, hence why Nick would not support attempts from them to undermine the US (which are real to some extent, as we saw in the case of that network tied to Tim Pool, doesn’t mean that it is anywhere near equal to Israel, nobody is saying that).
Would like to see what Anglin has to say about that “America will fall” Roseanne video. jews seem to be as confident about seeing America’s demise as Anglin is at times so I’m not convinced that would work out for us and tend to lean towards Nick’s position on this. If Anglin thinks that is naive he should address that directly instead of going for personal attacks and comparing Russia criticism to Rachel Maddow.
On Charlie Kirk, I thought that Anglin initially had the best take on this (in contrast to Nick’s glowing eulogy of Kirk) before he shifted to supporting the conspiracy angle. I see no convincing argument as to how Kirk’s death benefits Israel. Anglin’s take was that it caused the Right to begin calling for more govt surveillance and action against people it deems dangerous. That was true for maybe a week and things have largely returned to normal since then and nothing happened. Meanwhile, now Israel is down their biggest youth influencer who could have been an asset in fighting for jewish power for the next 60 years or more and potential president. Others will point to Kirk “turning” on Israel as a motive. I think it’s as Anglin says near the beginning of this article, pro-Israel has become such an unpopular position that nobody but Bari Weiss or Shapiro wants to be seen taking that position. That’s all Kirk was doing, he was not some kind of special case. I could go into that further but I’ll leave it there. Nick does not claim to support the official narrative on this either, just that he also doesn’t believe Israel would benefit and that many of the theories are grasping at straws (they are).
In regards to Nick’s rise being inauthentic and approved by the system. What we know for a fact is that he was inauthentically supressed by the system for years and years, like Anglin. But it’s much easier for them to pull off and justify banning links to a website they deem “harmful” than to go around banning every video clip containing a particular individual they deem harmful. I’d say they saw their attempts to suppress Nick as backfiring and creating a Streisand effect so they are switching tactics to treating him like a normal influencer in hopes that it may put an end to that but so far it hasn’t.
On Peter Thiel. Nick’s focus on Thiel’s paid Twitter influencers is a response to the attempt by Thiel to create a faction of the right on Twitter to counter groypers so it’s understandable that would not be seen as an insignificant thing by Nick and the idea that Nick is just being paid to focus on some minor aspect of Thiel to distract from the main game is not the case as he still spends far more time discussing the latter.
Most of all, even if everything Anglin accuses Nick of were true I have yet to see any reasoning on how Nick going viral and redpilling millions on the jews is somehow a bad thing that is going to help jews. Other than taking the zany position of “well, jews want the goyim to become antisemitic so that jews will return to Israel and fulfill the prophecy so if you go out and tell the truth about jews you are just helping the jews” I don’t see it.
War is waged by the US to keep oil expensive because that props up the US dollar. The notion that all our wars are fought from some infatuation to give Israeli Jews a safe homeland is a really outlandish fairy tale. No, we fight for oil but use whatever cover-story is near at hand, including that one.
Iraq and Libya we took off line, next the oil production of Iran, Russia, and Venezuela is headed for the chopping block. In the end-game, even US “allies” like Canada and Saudi Arabia will eventually have to be sacrificed to sustain the petrodollar.
It’s their religion not individual mental illness. This part is easy and everyone needs to know. They conspire to fulfill the prophecies of their religion which are the coming of the messiah, the rule of Jews over all nations with the capital at Jerusalem. They have to destroy all the nations of the world as part of the plan of ruling the world. Cohesive nations and peoples can resist.
Our enslavement is the their religion. Why be friends with someone from such an evil cult?
End of story.
it’s possible that Anglin is dead…..and AI is now imitating his usual gibberish.
You really need to get over your feud with Fuentes. Your whining about him is more pathetic than your adventures with prostitutes.
Indeed China seems to be high trust society judging by studies I found during my very brief search.
Here is the abstract from one recent paper:
This article provides a comprehensive examination of social trust in China. It addresses ongoing debates about how much people trust, whether there is a trust crisis, and where trust comes from. Analyzing extensive harmonized data from the Chinese General Social Survey (2003–2021) and the World Values Survey (1990–2018) spanning three decades, we find that Chinese people have high levels of general trust in others; this high social trust has been largely stable over the last three decades; and political confidence and perceived fairness are two key drivers of trust. On the other hand, we see marked low trust toward several groups, such as strangers, businessmen, and religious individuals.
https://www.ivysci.com/en/articles/6191511__Social_Trust_in_China?
So it looks like this isn’t new phenomena. China was already high trust society in the early 90’s and now more than 30 years later the TL:DR is, not much has changed. Except perhaps in some details between various sectors.
In my view this doesn’t quite match what the author of this article is saying:
So, what accounted for the surprising rebound of trust in the Chinese society?
I think four contributing factors are responsible for the transformation –
Technology
Accountability system (especially the anti-corruption campaign)
Social Credit System
Revival of Confucianism
First, I am unsure what rebound he is talking about, we don’t have figures going much further back about trust in China?
If I am not mistaken the high trust in Chinese society seems to have been present before the major changes he thinks are responsible for it happened!?
Or was technology, Social Credit System and Revival of Confucianism playing a role in the early 90’s when we have the first figures about trust in China? Seems unlikely.
So whatever it is that causes high trust in China is most likely something else that may have little if anything to do with recent economic development or political changes.
It’s very interesting to see such high trust in China on par with northern Europe. What do Norway, Sweden and Denmark have in common with China? In my view that’s the real question here. And here we perhaps have to look further back than few years or even decades. Because trust in societies seems to have considerable inertia.
Think about this, you live in high trust society where you hardly bother to lock your car or your house. And you generally trust your countrymen. Even if truly bad government and economic hardship comes along, that may change your views about the government and the ‘system’ and the ‘elites’ or ‘strangers’ but it does not change your trust in your neighbors or fellow countrymen in general and you still leave your car unlocked and the front door open for the neighbors kids. So this part of the high trust measurement doesn’t move much. I guess my point is, trust is a cultural thing.
Now, it may be problematic for our social scientists to pin down what causes high trust in groups or societies. They may fear what they find not to be politically correct. But that’s just a guess on my part.
And some of these YouTube videos shown upthread provide a remarkable empirical confirmation of that:
Indeed China seems to be high trust society judging by studies I found during my very brief search.
Would it still be high trust if the totalitarian surveillance and threat of institutional violence were removed? Finland is high trust and doesn't need these kind of mechanisms. The trust is inherent to the people, as long as their society is homogenous. The US, if you only look at the White areas is very high trust, again, without the totalitarian mechanisms. But once you add diversity it all collapses.Replies: @bike-anarkist, @littlereddot, @Same old same old
I think four contributing factors are responsible for the transformation –
Technology
Accountability system (especially the anti-corruption campaign)
Social Credit System
Revival of Confucianism
The US, if you only look at the White areas is very high trust, again, without the totalitarian mechanisms.
No such areas exist.
As evidenced by your unquestioning gullible belief that China is a totalitarian state.
This belief is fed to you by your 1984 style propaganda machine.
A machine that tells you that you are Free, and the China aka EastAsia is totalitarian.
IngSoc has already won your mind.
Of course the do. Small towns where people don't even lock their doors still exist. I have been there.
No such areas exist.
You are making up stuff. I am quite realistic about both China and the West and don't buy propaganda from either side. I was simply reacting to the claim that the social credit system (Which *is* a totalitarian tool) is to be credited with increased trust. It's not trust if your motivation is fear of punishment.
As evidenced by your unquestioning gullible belief that China is a totalitarian state.
I never said that "EastAsia" is totalitarian. You are making up stuff again. I didn't even say that China is totalitarian. I talked about totalitarian mechanisms. Whether the sum of totalitarian mechanisms end up in a totalitarian country is a spectrum. If you think China is 100% free, then you are a hopeless fool.Anyway, I am very aware of the world we live in. Next time don't make stupid assumptions, even if you think it will make you write something very "profound" and "intellectual".Replies: @littlereddot
A machine that tells you that you are Free, and the China aka EastAsia is totalitarian
China wasn't destroyed, though. Only set back. Same with Russia - badly damaged, but not destroyed.
The people that are destroying the West are the same people that destroyed China during its century of opium addiction.
but demographic replacement is the end.
So the USA returns to a state before Columbus.
What goes around comes around.
Did not your own prophet teach you that “Do unto others what ye would have done unto you?”
Just because you don’t consider it totalitarian doesn’t change that it is.
I didn’t say anything about Ameica being or not being totalitarian. All I said that there are White areas that are high trust even without totalitarian mechanisms, because it is and always was part of the culture.
No such areas exist.
The US, if you only look at the White areas is very high trust, again, without the totalitarian mechanisms.
No such areas exist.
Of course the do. Small towns where people don’t even lock their doors still exist. I have been there.
As evidenced by your unquestioning gullible belief that China is a totalitarian state.
You are making up stuff. I am quite realistic about both China and the West and don’t buy propaganda from either side. I was simply reacting to the claim that the social credit system (Which *is* a totalitarian tool) is to be credited with increased trust. It’s not trust if your motivation is fear of punishment.
A machine that tells you that you are Free, and the China aka EastAsia is totalitarian
I never said that “EastAsia” is totalitarian. You are making up stuff again. I didn’t even say that China is totalitarian. I talked about totalitarian mechanisms. Whether the sum of totalitarian mechanisms end up in a totalitarian country is a spectrum. If you think China is 100% free, then you are a hopeless fool.
Anyway, I am very aware of the world we live in. Next time don’t make stupid assumptions, even if you think it will make you write something very “profound” and “intellectual”.
Absolutely not.Have you ever been to China?Why then are you so confident that it is a totalitarian state?I have been there many times.
You are making up stuff. I am quite realistic about both China and the West and don’t buy propaganda from either side.
Which does not exist. It is made up by propagandists in the West.Yet you believe it wholesale....without ever going to China to verify if it is true or false.
the social credit system
You have no idea that what I referring to is a term used by George Orwell in his famous book called 1984.Gosh, if you comment on China with such confidence, you should at least be well read. Yet apparently, you are not. You watch a few youtube videos or read a couple of articles, and you think you are reading the truth.
I never said that “EastAsia” is totalitarian.
You only think so because you are neither well read, nor well travelled.Do you even own a passport?
You are making up stuff again.
Now you are making a straw man argument. I never said China is 100% free. No place is, even the USA.
If you think China is 100% free, then you are a hopeless fool.
From the views you have expressed, you strike me as a child, with neither knowledge nor experience.
I am very aware of the world we live in
I am not the one making assumptions.I do not call China totalitarian, especially without ever going there to verify for myself.
Next time don’t make stupid assumptions,
I am using everyday words meant to be understood by the common man. If you think what I am being "profound" or "intellectual", then you are even less than I assumed you to be.
make you write something very “profound” and “intellectual”.
The people that are destroying the West are the same people that destroyed China during its century of opium addiction.
China wasn’t destroyed, though. Only set back. Same with Russia – badly damaged, but not destroyed.
On the other hand, West is being truly destroyed. Countries can recover from war and communism, but demographic replacement is the end. Once it reaches a critical point, there is no way back.
So the USA returns to a state before Columbus.
but demographic replacement is the end.
I think four contributing factors are responsible for the transformation –
Technology
Accountability system (especially the anti-corruption campaign)
Social Credit System
Revival of Confucianism
Would it still be high trust if the totalitarian surveillance and threat of institutional violence were removed? Finland is high trust and doesn’t need these kind of mechanisms. The trust is inherent to the people, as long as their society is homogenous. The US, if you only look at the White areas is very high trust, again, without the totalitarian mechanisms. But once you add diversity it all collapses.
No such areas exist.
The US, if you only look at the White areas is very high trust, again, without the totalitarian mechanisms.
Mr. Taylor:
You are an intelligent and even a noble man. I salute both your intellect and your nobility.
But this article of yours savors of desperation. It reminds me of the Spanish Republican battle cry: “!No pasaran!” But the Nationalists did “pasaran”, noble slogans notwithstanding.
History shows, I think, that when a civilization or a people lose their religion they lose their reason for sacrificing short-term pleasures for long-term social goals. When you’re on the Titanic and all the lifeboats have left, why not drink the champagne?
What does Whitey believe in? What God or gods, what higher purpose will he die defending? “Christianity”, say the Hillsdale College Conservatives, thumping their copies of G.K. Chesterton. “Christianity is the Religion of Slaves”, say the Nietzsche-heads. “Christianity is the Mulatto Spawn of Judaism and the Hellenized Romans”, say the anti-Judaics. “Christianity is a set of beautiful children’s fables that cannot survive in our scientific age”, say the logical philosophers.
Shall European Man embrace atheism? One cannot “embrace” a spiritual vacuum. And, most pathetic of all “solutions”, Norse-heads expect a few fools to join them in a half-hearted return to an archaic Europaganism that’s as unconvincing as Christianity or Islam.
Euro-man is busy spinning a technological web in which to ensnare himself, a web which he fears to spin and yet continues to spin. He is increasingly nervous of AI, yet feels powerless to stop or even slow its progress. Can Whitey still boast, “I am the master of my fate; I am the captain of my soul”?
He lets his women push him around. (Blacks sneer at Whitey for this, and this time they’re right.) Few on “the right” will dare to attack feminism for the corrosive solvent that it is. How can men without cajones stand, like the Spartans at Thermopylae, against such powerful foes? “Transgenderism”, predominantly a White Man’s disease, shows how profoundly sick he now is.
Your battle cry of “Europe will not surrender” is akin to King Canute commanding the sea to retreat. The die was cast in Sarajevo in 1914. The Greek tragedy “The Fall of Europe” is in Scene 1 of its final Act.
“The moving finger writes; and having writ, moves on; nor all thy wishes cancel half a line, nor all thy tears wash out a word of it.”
Low intensity warfare has started already
For politicians and the “elites”, this is just an annoyance that will eventually fizzle out. Time is running out.
Am tiring of people like you using the American moniker “civil war”.
Only a dumb American would say this. The term “civil war” is much older than America.
Anyway, the Jews do not care about Nick Fuentes. No one cares about Nick Fuentes. He can’t ever be popular, he is too repulsive. He can use my material and get some attention, but that’s it.
Dude enough on Fuentes you sound pathetic.
Yes, and it is becoming an increasingly bad look for him. Let’s just suppose for argument’s sake that that he is right and Fuentes ‘stole’ his ideas, whatever that means. This endless whining is not going to win over anyone outside of the most extreme Fuentes haters. The ankle-biting vibe wreaks of weakness and certainly not the best way to start his podcasting career.
You missed the point schlomo.
Anglin is definitely jealous of Fuentes.
I don’t know about you, but if my siblings were murdering civilians I would immediately become their enemy. I wouldn’t defend my brother if he was going around shooting children in the head like IDF snipers have been doing in Gaza, in fact I would feel a special responsibility to stop him exactly because he is my brother.
This is the mistake we Whites are making. Every other tribe puts their people first. Whites want to be “fair” to everybody else, even if it means that we lose. No wonder our world is going to shit.
And no, this is not an endorsement of genocide. Just making a point that if you don’t put your family first and your tribe ahead of other tribes, you will inevitably suffer.
No
Mortgage is a form of leverage. Most people can’t work with leverage, but those who can and those who are just lucky (majority) put 5% down on a $500k home and when it goes up by 10% in a year, they made 200% profit (yes, there are other costs, but this is a simplified example). This is why Americans keep flipping homes like crazy when mortgage rates are low.
50 year mortgages will make this kind of speculation cheaper and more prevalent.
This is clearly the intent. Instead of popping the bubble, they want to turbo-charge it. And the banks will do their usual Ponzi schemes and turn this into more trillion$ of assets, collateral, for even more Wall St. Casino gambling. They can't help themselves, and they own the government, so they get to write the rules to enable their addiction/predations.
50 year mortgages will make this kind of speculation cheaper and more prevalent.
He wasn’t talking about Indians from the subcontinent.
Also, Indians preparing meals – ewww!
Agent Anglin’s writing style has changed quite a bit from essays past…methinks his (new?) ghostwriters are more advanced.
ChatGPT?
“China did not have all of these regulations” – uh, excuse me.
China does not allow billionaires to bribe government officials to let them loot the public treasury. China does not allow Chinese companies to export key technologies and infrastructure to other countries with cheaper labor or laxer regulations (nota bene: Mexican wages have been lower than Chinas for decades now). China does not let the big banks strip mine the real economy for bailouts for egregious financial nonsense. China does not allow financial parasites like George Soros et al. to loot their nation (Cry me a river. Oh, the humanity!). etc.
The Chinese economy is quite seriously regulated. Kind of like the US economy was seriously regulated back during the New Deal era.
In fact, China will disappear the Billionaire for a few months or year of “re-education,” and shoot the bribed official pour encourager les autres.
China does not allow billionaires to bribe government officials to let them loot the public treasury.
Just as the reigning Jewish cabal hates Russia for no longer being Communist, it hates China for being anti-corruption.
China does not allow billionaires...
What a disgusting POS! I used to read his crap 20 years ago. I was a foolish young man.
They were not shot because they deserved it. They were shot to protect other communist criminals, who were then free to become democrats or successful and totally honest entrepreneurs.
When the couple got caught there wasn’t, really, any reason to execute them, or, at least, not that fast. We, watching/following that, were expecting a trial and then, perhaps, capital punishment. Like what happened later on with all those taken down by the New World Order (save Qaddafi). So, why the rush ?
Makes sense.
They were not shot because they deserved it. They were shot to protect other communist criminals, who were then free to become democrats or successful and totally honest entrepreneurs.
Perhaps you can explain what the Malagasies (?) did to deserve such a fate. At the end of the day, everywhere you might propose exiling all the Jews is either uninhabitable or already inhabited. In the former case, you're merely repeating the Holocaust without admitting it. In the latter, you're subjecting some group of innocents to the burden of Jewish exploitation and abuse simply because they're too weak to stop you.
'That being said, I am all for the proposed solution, as long as it involves relocating them to Madagascar... '
Perhaps you can explain what the Malagasies (?) did to deserve such a fate.
I’ve had enough of caring about other peoples. We need to start taking care of our own.
If there is anyone who is implicated in Jewish crimes, it is ourselves. Logically, we should have to take them all
No. We already did that and it doesn’t work. It will never work. We are not their, nor the world’s babysitters.
It's one thing to be indifferent to the fate of others. It's another matter entirely to actively screw them.Replies: @Dirk_Gently00
'I’ve had enough of caring about other peoples. We need to start taking care of our own.'
Ultimately, it did work. Supposedly, many modern Spaniards carry Jewish genes -- but few of them think of themselves as Jews. As MacDonald discusses, some families of 'New Christians' maintained a sense of separate identity as late as the Eighteenth Century -- but that identity kept fading, and became increasingly meaningless.Portugal followed similar policies of forcible conversion -- albeit they were less draconian about it. I once saw a documentary on the descendants of the conversos. In some cases, they were still identifiable, but the identity was pretty meaningless. Two little old ladies who lit a candle behind drawn curtains every Friday; they knew they should hide it, but they were at a loss to explain why. Others babbling about how the King had been going to kill them, but the good Queen Esther intervened and so...Fractured fairy tales. Forced into hiding, the faith had become first fragmented and then meaningless. The same thing happened to Christianity in Kyushu. In some mountain villages, as late as the Nineteenth Century the inhabitants still followed rituals that obviously had Christian origins, but they could hardly be said to be practicing Christianity, or to be in any substantial sense Christians.Obviously, secular American Jews -- whose faith has few explicit pillars at all beyond attachment to Israel and worship of the Holocaust -- would be even more susceptible to such a process. Indeed, even as it is, a lot of Jews -- particularly working class Jews -- fall away. They retain little of their faith beyond a claim that they are Jewish, and their children retain nothing at all. At any rate, I'd certainly like to try such a route first. If you want to be in certain fields, or accumulate vast riches, you have to disavow your Judaism, and not only talk the talk, but walk the walk. I've no lust to inflict unnecessary misery on American Jewry. I am entirely certain that there is a problem, and we need to address it.Replies: @theRealHun
'This did not work in Spain 600 years ago, what makes you think it will work now?'
We don’t have hundreds of years for their identity to fade enough so that they lose the urge to infiltrate, subvert and destroy. Like they did with the Catholic Church.
You may have also missed the fashionable wave of Spanish conversos rediscovering their jewish identity centuries after forced conversions to Catholicism.
That being said, I am all for the proposed solution, as long as it involves relocating them to Madagascar. If they can prove, over the next couple of centuries, that they can exist like normal non-psychopathic humans, they can be released back.
Perhaps you can explain what the Malagasies (?) did to deserve such a fate. At the end of the day, everywhere you might propose exiling all the Jews is either uninhabitable or already inhabited. In the former case, you're merely repeating the Holocaust without admitting it. In the latter, you're subjecting some group of innocents to the burden of Jewish exploitation and abuse simply because they're too weak to stop you.
'That being said, I am all for the proposed solution, as long as it involves relocating them to Madagascar... '
Being an antisemite is getting to be like being a vegetarian.There are vegans, then there are people who will drink milk, then people who will drink milk and eat eggs, then people who will eat fish but not red meat.Similarly, it's hard to avoid the observation that there is much to be antisemitic about; but how antisemitic? That's the question.At one extreme there are those who think the problem is confined to Israel; make Israel go away and everything would be fine. Americans all...other than Israel, Jews aren't a problem. At the other, there are those who think the only problem with the Third Reich is that Hitler didn't finish the job.Speaking for myself, of course Israel has to go -- but the seven million-odd resulting Jewish refugees have to be given asylum somewhere. And excessive Jewish power and influence here needs to be reined in in some practicable yet reasonably humane way.Personally, I think that anyone who won't disavow a Jewish identity and participation in any form of Jewish association should be barred from various fields, including law, the media, control of academic institutions, teaching positions in non-STEM fields, and the federal government. They should also be prohibited from accumulating or somehow retaining control over fantastic amounts of wealth -- say, over one hundred million dollars. If it proved necessary, those of an obviously Jewish background could be compelled to formally convert to some reasonably demanding form of Christianity or Islam if they wished to evade the restrictions.This wouldn't actually prevent anyone from having a decent life -- and hopefully, it would suffice. The general idea would be to enforce a reduction to a kind of status equivalent to Mormons, who are perfectly prosperous, have about the same numbers as do Jews, follow an ideology about as alien to the rest of us -- and have a level of influence that is more or less commensurate with their numbers. The only distinction would be that while Mormons occupy a reasonable position of their own accord, Jews would have to be legally confined to it.Replies: @Redpill Boomer, @theRealHun, @Ronehjr
We can only wish there were as many antisemites as the ADL claims. Maybe then we would have a fighting chance.
I think that anyone who won’t disavow a Jewish identity and participation in any form of Jewish association should be barred from various fields
This did not work in Spain 600 years ago, what makes you think it will work now?
Ultimately, it did work. Supposedly, many modern Spaniards carry Jewish genes -- but few of them think of themselves as Jews. As MacDonald discusses, some families of 'New Christians' maintained a sense of separate identity as late as the Eighteenth Century -- but that identity kept fading, and became increasingly meaningless.Portugal followed similar policies of forcible conversion -- albeit they were less draconian about it. I once saw a documentary on the descendants of the conversos. In some cases, they were still identifiable, but the identity was pretty meaningless. Two little old ladies who lit a candle behind drawn curtains every Friday; they knew they should hide it, but they were at a loss to explain why. Others babbling about how the King had been going to kill them, but the good Queen Esther intervened and so...Fractured fairy tales. Forced into hiding, the faith had become first fragmented and then meaningless. The same thing happened to Christianity in Kyushu. In some mountain villages, as late as the Nineteenth Century the inhabitants still followed rituals that obviously had Christian origins, but they could hardly be said to be practicing Christianity, or to be in any substantial sense Christians.Obviously, secular American Jews -- whose faith has few explicit pillars at all beyond attachment to Israel and worship of the Holocaust -- would be even more susceptible to such a process. Indeed, even as it is, a lot of Jews -- particularly working class Jews -- fall away. They retain little of their faith beyond a claim that they are Jewish, and their children retain nothing at all. At any rate, I'd certainly like to try such a route first. If you want to be in certain fields, or accumulate vast riches, you have to disavow your Judaism, and not only talk the talk, but walk the walk. I've no lust to inflict unnecessary misery on American Jewry. I am entirely certain that there is a problem, and we need to address it.Replies: @theRealHun
'This did not work in Spain 600 years ago, what makes you think it will work now?'
I think 2.6 or 0.9 are fine statistical representations of the relative attitudes between men and women towards having children. No need to nitpick.
I hope the women enjoy what they voted for.
I get the sentiment, they deserve it, but that also means that White men die out. This is why the shift towards far right sentiments should be encouraged among men. We are in an extreme situation that demands extreme reaction.
Aren’t young men increasingly far right, while young women are increasingly far left? This kind of polarization is new. Assuming it’s real. But if it is then it’s unsustainable and it will blow up.
I saw a stat from China somewhere, that their young men want to have (on average) 2.6 children, while young women only 0.9. I think it’s safe to say the situation is very similar in the West. Maybe even worse, once you remove the invaders from stats. This alone should cause a violent readjustment. Either men wake up and return society to normality or we will be overrun and kiled by the invaders.
My response:
Hello pervert,
I want to inform you about a very bad situation for you. However, you can benefit from it, if you will act wisely.
Have you heard of Pegasus? This is a spyware program that installs on computers and smartphones and allows hackers to monitor the activity of device owners. It provides access to your webcam, messengers, emails, call records, etc. It works well on Android, iOS, and Windows. I guess, you already figured out where I’m getting at.
It’s been a few months since I installed it on all your devices because you were not quite choosy about what links to click on the internet. During this period, I’ve learned about all aspects of your private life, but one is of special significance to me.
I’ve recorded many videos of you jerking off to highly controversial porn videos. Given that the “questionable” genre is almost always the same, I can conclude that you have sick perversion.
I doubt you’d want your friends, family and co-workers to know about it. However, I can do it in a few clicks.
Every number in your contact book will suddenly receive these videos – on WhatsApp, on Telegram, on Skype, on email – everywhere. It is going to be a tsunami that will sweep away everything in its path, and first of all, your former life.
Don’t think of yourself as an innocent victim. No one knows where your perversion might lead in the future, so consider this a kind of deserved punishment to stop you.
Better late than never.
I’m some kind of God who sees everything. However, don’t panic. As we know, God is merciful and forgiving, and so do I. But my mercy is not free.
Transfer $999 USD to my bitcoin wallet: bc1q7kn8n7mjngk9t9cvh3crgqa7xzdaday3meamth
Once I receive confirmation of the transaction, I will permanently delete all videos compromising you, uninstall Pegasus from all of your devices, and disappear from your life. You can be sure – my benefit is only money. Otherwise, I wouldn’t be writing to you, but destroy your life without a word in a second.
I’ll be notified when you open my email, and from that moment you have exactly 48 hours to send the money. If cryptocurrencies are unchartered waters for you, don’t worry, it’s very simple. Just google “crypto exchange” and then it will be no harder than buying some useless stuff on Amazon.
I strongly warn you against the following:
) Do not reply to this email. is your address!
) Do not contact the police. I have access to all your devices, and as soon as I find out you ran to the cops, videos will be published.
) Don’t try to reset or destroy your devices.
As I mentioned above: I’m monitoring all your activity, so you either agree to my terms or the videos are published.
Also, don’t forget that cryptocurrencies are anonymous, so it’s impossible to identify me using the provided address.
Good luck, my perverted friend. I hope this is the last time we hear from each other.
And some friendly advice: from now on, don’t be so careless about your online security.
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy tabletReplies: @theRealHun, @Steve Naidamast
Hello sucker,
How much did you pay for the template for this scam? I've received over a dozen of these already.
Blackmail is illegal and a federal crime as well as a state crime and you can go to jail for it. And the FBI and others can find you via your email and ip address.
I can also find you using more sketchy resources, and maybe even hack your Bitcoin wallet using those same resources. They are more knowledgeable about computer scams than your pathetic cookie cutter attempt.
But you don't really have anything to blackmail with. Just like the other hundreds of suckers who paid for your scam template and send the same letter with minor variations to thousands of email addresses. You can't afford Pegasus spyware, much less installing it on those thousands of devices. If you could afford it, there are many better and legitimate ways to make much more money with that investment.
So you can FOAD, my foolish scammer friend.
Why would you ever respond to these scammers? They don’t care. If one person doesn’t bite, somebody else will.
I remember those furry creatures. Everybody had at least one before they were made illegal. Good times.
Vladimir Lenin was a Russian revolutionary, the founder of the USSR, a brilliant political economist, and author of many books.
This is so ridiculously wrong, I stopped reading right there.
“A brilliant political economist?” Is this some kind of a sick joke? This vile, incompetent, fanatical mass murderer was nothing but a vengeful, louse who, on purpose and through catastrophic incompetence, ushered in the complete collapse of Russia.
It’s good that the nominally communist party of China has followed a diametrically opposite course of action in charting their economic development than that of their “brilliant” economic progenitor.
JD Vance is the heir apparent of the Trump movement. He’s positioned himself as a supporter of the historic American people, has a legitimate military background and is a smart guy as well as a good speaker. His ties to India through his wife and the tech oligarchs also gives him an advantage in fund raising. Tucker couldn’t get elected dog catcher in his home town. He’s being positioned to step in and interview whoever takes Netanyahu’s place and then declare the Israelis good guys again.
Judge Nap has zero charisma. Not leader material.
Alex Jones is a nutcase and sellout.
This author is a joke.
Second, this genocide is not Israel’s. It is the West’s. This is utterly a western co-production. Israel could have done none of the destruction of Gaza, the mass slaughter, the starvation of the population, without western assistance every step of the way.
Yes, it’s true that Israel couldn’t commit it’s genocide without Western support, but that does not mean it’s the West’s fault. Israel is responsible for it’s own actions.
This author also fails to mention that Jewish influence in the West is so pervasive, that the arguement can certainly be made that Jews own the West, and certainly Western politicians at this point. The EU is a Jew creation.
Besides, Israel couldn’t even exist as a state without Western support and aid. The US and EU tax payer nearly bankroll the entire country so the fucking Jews that live there can get near free university education, government subsidized housing, healthcare that costs a tiny fraction of what it costs in the US and a near unlimited supply of military weapons to defend the “Jewish state”.
The “blood libel” doesn’t protect Jews from another genocide.
There was never a Jewish genocide in the first place. It’s totally made up. The holocaust never happened. Sure people died, the photos you see are real, but nobody was deliberately exterminated and there was absolutely no plan to do so.
It is white, western, colonial, genocidal racism, repackaged as a supposedly “Jewish” project.
Stop using Jewish made terms, such as “racism”. Terms like this are another Jewish creation. Using them puts you at a disadvantage. The people back during the “settler-colonial” times were much more tribal, that is, they were tolerant of their own people, but generally not tolerant of outsiders of other races. If the West was more racist, we wouldn’t be in this problem we are in now.
Excellent comment but the author's point is that Israel can not do this genocide without western support is correct. Yes, Israel is responsible, and the officers of the Israeli government could soon be tried for war crimes. But what about Trump? The President of the United States is endorsing and funding the genocide. Trump is hosting the war criminal Netanyahu. Everyone knows the Gaza genocide and the Ukraine war would end without US aid, money, weapons, advisors, satellite intelligence, etc. The west is neck deep in both wars. This is provable and can be prosecuted.Aiding and abetting a genocide make Trump and his lieutenants equally guilty. Trump can hang by the neck with Netanyahu. JD Vance and Tulsi and Dan Bongino are guilty too. Why any of them stick around and not resign under protest is a mystery, apparently they think they are immune from prosecution. Congress is also guilty, they can impeach Trump or stop the money flow. Basically the top tier of the US Government are all liable for Nuremburg style war crime tribunal. And I hope it happens and I will cheer when Trumpenstein is dead by hanging or firing squad.The bigger issue, not mentioned by the author or the commenters is the role of the Holy Bible in this genocide. Yes, the Holy Bible is the real fundamental cause of this insanity - and it should be held accountable and banned, along with Judaism, and all Jewish organizations. If people were sane this would be obvious. But many people, especially politically active Evangelicals along with so many Zionist Congressmen, and Trump and his staff, are all raging 'end of days' lunatics. They believe in Israel as a prophetic sign, they support Israel because of their Bible beliefs, they are eager for this Apocalyptic war because they believe it will bring back their (space) Lord.Trump has to be insane to endorse the genocide and Israel - when doing so makes him a war criminal and because Israel is an existential threat to the survival of the United States. Israel assassinated JFK, did 911, bankrupted our treasury for the wars, openly threatens our political leaders, etc. No sane president would tolerate Israel or genocide. But treasonous Trump is all in on it, completely immoral, and a traitor to boot - Trump is MIGA not MAGA, Trump is acting as an officer of Israel not the President, he is a liar and deceiver, and maybe even the antichrist.The biggest reason why Jews operate with immunity in the United States is because of widespread belief in the Holy Bible. In that fictional book, Jews (aka Israelites) are named as god's chosen people. Never mind that modern Ashkenazi Jews, who are the majority in Israel, including Bibi Netanyahu (Mileikowsky) are not the same blood race as the ancient Hebrews. The myth is believed to be real, Evangelical Christians, who believe the Bible literal, are taught to obey, revere, and worship Jews as the chosen (master) race. These Scofield Bible cucked Christians have literally made the Jews their god, as has Donald Chumpenstein, whose daughter is married to Chabad Jared Kushner. It is rumored that Trump has converted also. Trump is technically a Jew. Jew Trumpenstein is co-committing a huge war crime with Satanyahu. Trump and Netanyahu are competing for most evil actor on planet earth.The real question, is how did the United States end up is this Jew quagmire and what must we do to get sane again? We must overcome the myth that binds us to the Jews. Christ-insanity is married to Jew-insanity. The genocide is a co-production between believing Christians and believing Jews. Evangelical Christians proudly display the Israel flag together with the Stars and Stripes. They take their vacations to the holy land. The 700 Club and other televangelical channels broadcast daily from Jerusalem, our conservative Republican reps are currently on a junket in Israel at their choice.
Yes, it’s true that Israel couldn’t commit it’s genocide without Western support, but that does not mean it’s the West’s fault. Israel is responsible for it’s own actions.This author also fails to mention that Jewish influence in the West is so pervasive, that the arguement can certainly be made that Jews own the West, and certainly Western politicians at this point.
Our representatives are definitely not acting like vassals in resistance, nor are they doing anything to end AIPAC influence. Nope. They are all in on it, especially the Christian ones like the U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, former Governor of Bible belt Arkansas, not to mention being a Baptist preacher himself. Mike loves and adores Israel with all his heart and soul. Just like all the other fundamentalist Christians, especially Billy Graham, his ministry now run by his pro-Israel son who doesn't give a damn about Palestinians (even the Christian ones).
Just in time for the congressional summer recess, AIPAC has arranged trips to Jerusalem for dozens of pro-Israel Democrats and Republicans, and a visit with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for scores of Republicans still in Washington.But that’s not all. Other lawmakers are on their own, separate trips to Israel. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R.-La.) went there this week, including a stop at illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, with a cohort of four other pro-Israel Republicans: Michael McCaul (R-Texas), Michael Cloud (R-Texas), Claudia Tenney (R-N.Y.) and Nathaniel Moran (R-Texas). Their trip was sponsored by the U.S. Israel Education Association.Meanwhile, Rick Crawford (R-Ar.), chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, led a bipartisan Congressional Delegation (CODEL) to Israel since its brief war on Iran earlier this summer.
Preacher to 13 Presidents, Billy Graham provided moral cover for mass murdering USA policies
International Christian Relief Organization Providing Life-Saving Medical Support, Trauma Supplies, and Food Relief to War-torn IsraelBoone, N.C. Jan. 23, 2024—Today, Franklin Graham, president of Samaritan's Purse, dedicated 14 new ambulances in Israel, which are being provided to Magen David Adom (MDA), Israel's national ambulance and emergency services agency.“I believe in this organization. You risk your life to save life, and I felt that these ambulances needed to be replaced immediately,” said Franklin Graham, president of Samaritan's Purse. “We pray that these ambulances will bring comfort to the people of Israel, knowing that someone can respond to any crisis, so we thank God ...
It's not aid.
Israel couldn’t even exist as a state without Western support and aid...
https://rumble.com/embed/v6uvjam/?pub=4Replies: @Anonymous, @Felpudinho, @Miro23, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Anonymous, @tamberlint, @Monika92gti, @Anon, @anon
.☆☆☆☠️☆☆☆ ®[AP©CALYPSENOWNEWS]™ ☆☆☆☠️☆☆☆.
https://thegovernmentrag.com/articles/todays-life-and-death-battle-to-control-your-mind/
By you posting this by Groyper Glowie FBI informant, Nick Feuntes, I can assume you’re a glowie as well.
I always thought it was strange how Feuntes would target the same people, at the same time, as the ADL and affiliated groups. Tucker, Candace, EMJ, et al. Then someone clued me in.
If you want to figure out who’s a fed informant, just notice who they’re aligned with.
Is this about Fuentes?Replies: @PapaP
If I had thousands of people paying me $1,200 a year to be in a group chat, I would send a few bucks to the guy whose ideas I copy-pasted to build my career.
The most civilized white people in Islamic Spain, who also happened to be the most civilized white people in all of Europe for many centuries, were Muslims. For a few more centuries, the most civilized white people in Eastern Europe were Muslims. And the primordially whitest people on Earth, the Caucasians of the Caucacus Mountains region, are Muslims. Islam has a vast, rich history in Europe.
You write ridiculous garbage.
Islam as the best version of Christianity
This is a really hard sell. Islam denies essentially all Christian dogmas; at that point it would be better to just start over with European paganism. Right now I think we can say Europe has nothing to gain by adopting Middle Eastern religions. All Islam has to promote for us is more liberalist-style universalism. We already have that with Christianity and it’s killing us. If we’re going to throw out Christianity we need particularism, not universalism, and Islam can’t give us that.
You could use the same excuses for Christianity then. Europeans don’t need another alien Middle-Eastern religion.
if Europeans accept Islam
How about NO? Why should Europeans accept another alien Middle-Eastern religion?
So instead of averaging one child per woman and dying out in a generation or two, which is the path that they’re on now, suddenly there would be lots more indigenous European people
The birthrate of Morocco, your home country, is barely at replacement level and trending down, so your argument falls apart the moment you start being honest.
KYS, retard. Circumcision is mutilation. Apparently you have been mutilated and it affected your brain.
I don’t know actually. But anti-zionism was de-facto official policy, jew jokes were common and “to jew” meant “to lie”.
I grew up in a communist country. Nobody has ever mentioned the Holocaust.
neo–Nazis who control the military and the civilian administration
Dumb
Neo-Nazi?
This intellectually lazy shit is so tiresome.
If you want to be a Nazi you are supposed to do what’s good for your people. For Ukrainians this would obviously mean to co-exist with Russia and get rid of the western empire. If you exist as a puppet of the US state department you certainly don’t qualify as a Nazi.
On top of that you need a national-socialist leadership to qualify as a Neo-Nazi movement. Since when are Zelensky, Boris Johnson, Victoria Nuland and the others Nazis?
Everyone with half a brain should be able to understand this.
Do you do that often, or just for Z Man?
Complaining under an eulogy piece about being banned from comments is incredibly bad taste.
That should be self-evident from the text.
What is your point?
Given that all it does is promote demoralization, since absolutely no one is ever going to do anything about any of this, anywhere, at any time, and to any degree, yes. It shouldn't have been written. Indeed, for several years now, I’ve been of the belief that a large proportion of informational “alternative media” articles written about the bad things happening to “the West” and even “to whites” (for those controlled opposition enough to actually name us) are being written solely for the purpose of demoralization, because they know that absolutely no one anywhere will ever do anything about them.Don’t even bother denying it. “People can still afford to live!” And yet you refuse to quantify how much worse our economic conditions need to get before anyone will do anything. “We just need more people to know about what’s happening!” And yet you refuse to quantify what the “critical mass” is supposed to be. “They haven’t destroyed enough of our social institutions for it to matter to anyone!” And yet you refuse to list which remaining social institutions have to be destroyed before whites stop allowing our own genocide.I can’t even get people to defend their own (claimed) beliefs. Because they don’t actually hold them. And they won’t even admit that, they’re so fucking cowardly.
Should nobody talk about this?
Yes.
Are you just venting? Are you trying to wake people up?
I don’t even like to privately suffer. Do you? You clearly do. You do nothing about it. You don’t even acknowledge that it’s something to be done about. That’s step fucking one. We have, what, how many white people who are jew-wise these days? More than 20 years ago, probably. Fewer, however, than at any other time in human history, going back to the days before we have written records. And no one does anything.* Where is anyone ignoring the “law” and refusing to entreat with the nonwhites with falsely conferred citizenship.
D0 you like to publicly suffer?
OK, so you are just venting and demoralizing. Got it.
Who cares
What is your point? Should AA not have writtent this article? Should nobody talk about this?
You always write the same thing. “Oh well, doesn’t matter.” Are you just venting? Are you trying to wake people up? D0 you like to publicly suffer? Or is it something else?
That should be self-evident from the text.
What is your point?
Given that all it does is promote demoralization, since absolutely no one is ever going to do anything about any of this, anywhere, at any time, and to any degree, yes. It shouldn't have been written. Indeed, for several years now, I’ve been of the belief that a large proportion of informational “alternative media” articles written about the bad things happening to “the West” and even “to whites” (for those controlled opposition enough to actually name us) are being written solely for the purpose of demoralization, because they know that absolutely no one anywhere will ever do anything about them.Don’t even bother denying it. “People can still afford to live!” And yet you refuse to quantify how much worse our economic conditions need to get before anyone will do anything. “We just need more people to know about what’s happening!” And yet you refuse to quantify what the “critical mass” is supposed to be. “They haven’t destroyed enough of our social institutions for it to matter to anyone!” And yet you refuse to list which remaining social institutions have to be destroyed before whites stop allowing our own genocide.I can’t even get people to defend their own (claimed) beliefs. Because they don’t actually hold them. And they won’t even admit that, they’re so fucking cowardly.
Should nobody talk about this?
Yes.
Are you just venting? Are you trying to wake people up?
I don’t even like to privately suffer. Do you? You clearly do. You do nothing about it. You don’t even acknowledge that it’s something to be done about. That’s step fucking one. We have, what, how many white people who are jew-wise these days? More than 20 years ago, probably. Fewer, however, than at any other time in human history, going back to the days before we have written records. And no one does anything.* Where is anyone ignoring the “law” and refusing to entreat with the nonwhites with falsely conferred citizenship.
D0 you like to publicly suffer?
Lol quite literally, he was a used car salesman irl
He was a very intelligent and well established IT guy you mental midget. His profile is literally on LinkedIn you brainlet. Christopher Zeeman… RIP bro, you were a good egg and my one stop shop ever single day for the best DR takes and commentariat on the web.
-Apex Predator / Jay in DC
Shalom and STFU you loser.
Sad to hear it. Much of what he wrote was good stuff, some very good indeed. Condolences to his family
...It runs predictive analytics—assessing not just what a state has done, but what it might do—based on behavioural models derived from counterterrorism doctrine. This feature was designed for battlefield targeting, not legal compliance.
That distinction has blurred. Palantir’s software played a central role in identifying suspected Iranian facilities at Turquzabad and Marivan—sites later cited in both UN deliberations and Israeli public accusations. These assessments, derived from software designed for warzones, were presented by a neutral UN body as hard intelligence. Some nuclear experts raised alarms. “Predictive AI and safeguards don’t mix,” a former senior IAEA analyst said in 2023. “It turns monitoring into pretext.”
The problem? Mosaic’s lineage screams bias. Funded by In-Q-Tel, the CIA’s venture arm, Palantir powers IDF targeting in Gaza and Ukraine’s drone strikes. Mosaic’s black-box algorithms, unauditable and proprietary, risk turning the IAEA from neutral inspector into a data proxy for preemptive war
.
Mosaic wasn’t designed to verify treaty compliance—it was designed to win wars. It maps threat networks, infers intentions, and flags emerging dangers, much like it does in Gaza and Ukraine today. When that mindset infects arms control, preemption becomes prophecy.
What began as a post-9/11 data project to track insurgents in Iraq has evolved into an opaque surveillance leviathan embedded in global governance. Palantir’s Mosaic platform, originally developed with CIA and DARPA backing, now straddles the line between oversight and warfare—especially at institutions like the IAEA.
The IAEA was never built to operate like an intelligence agency. Its mandate is verification, not prediction.
Replies: @random bogan, @theRealHun, @BrooLidd
The structure of Mosaic itself undermines confidence. The platform’s core architecture is closed-source. Its inferences are not reproducible. Outputs cannot be traced back to raw inputs by third parties, especially states under inspection. When suspicion is codified into UN safeguards reports, the result is a PRETEXT for violence masquerading as verification and accurate analytics.
Legal scholars have raised alarms. While no formal treaty bans the use of predictive analytics in arms control, the introduction of unverifiable military-grade algorithms into civilian verification structures violates the spirit—if not the letter—of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Mosaic’s use in informing JCPOA compliance decisions, for instance, gave disproportionate weight to American-built, Israeli-aligned surveillance outputs in shaping multilateral policy.
The result is a quiet but decisive drift from oversight to overreach. The IAEA, once the guarantor of restraint, now stands accused of laundering the logic of military intelligence through the language of diplomacy. And in doing so, it may have enabled the very thing it was designed to prevent: a unilateral war justified by data that cannot be challenged.
AI didn’t start the war. The people who wanted the war have manufactured an excuse. They always do. This time, it’s AI. Next time it will be tea leaves.
The people controlling Joe Biden initiated an outright foreign invasion of the United States.
The invasion has been going on for decades.
They definitely need nukes. Ba’athist Iraq and Lybia had no nukes, while Best Korea does have them. Which one is still around?
Trump … unqualified
OK, I will ask: Who was the last “qualified” president? And what qualities / criteria make a president “qualified”?
Because as far as I can tell, from looking at any president over the past 100 or so years, the only “qualification” that is absolutely required, is the complete subservience to the small hat people and to their criminal country.
Keep lol-ing. Without Whites you would live in a mud hut, like your ancestors. One day, maybe you will.
Women may want less children, but they don’t want children less. (Yes I know it should be “fewer children” but I like how the line scans.)
Birth control and feminism have given women the luxury of doing things on their own timetable-or so they think. The tragedy is, many want to at least be married by age 30. But in their third decade, they look around and find that the man they think they deserve is nowhere to be found (six ft tall, sixpack abs, six-figure income). The practical-minded might reach out to their “backup plan”, the man they kept in the friendzone five or ten years previously. But even these men have wised up and don’t want to pay full retail for used goods.
Assertions provided without evidence , can be rejected without evidence.
I’m not sure what evidence you think you have given. There’s always 30-50 years of oil left because that’s the proven oil reserves divided by yearly consumption. This was true when I was in school 30 years ago and it’s true now. In fact the time to disaster has gone from 30 to 50 years in the future, or from now until 2070.
We never ran out. Proven reserves are oil fields that are in production or are 90% certain of producing. The oil never runs out because new technologies bring other unproven reserves or uneconomic reserves into play, and there are also known reserves that are not yet technologically viable. Some will never be, some will.
Dividing present consumption into proven reserves gives us 50 years, into unproven reserves gives us 100 years, and into as yet technologically infeasible yet known reserves gives us 1000 years.
And even worse for the doomsayers demand is dropping off as electricity and transport move away from oil demand is expected to peak, possibly leading to a glut of oil by decades end.
https://www.ft.com/content/cfb97534-b71b-490f-b626-6dc3487f595d?utm_source=chatgpt.com. And
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/jun/12/world-faces-staggering-oil-glut-end-decade-energy-/
(From the IEA)
Resource depletion and the end of the oil age and industrial economies is not a “theory”, it is empirically evident in the recorded in geological history of the raw materials extraction industry in the modern age. Cheap oil is the key resource propping up extraction of all other essential raw materials as their quality decreases. Copper ore, for instance, contains only a small fraction of the metal it once contained a century ago. Ditto other essential minerals. In the US, cheap oil peaked circa 1950 with the maturing of drilling and refining technology and the mapping of all the best oil plays. Net usable oil – energy return on energy invested – has been declining ever since. Globally, oil discoveries peaked circa 1965.
Well, I’m pretty skeptical that China’s demographic problems are this serious. Here’s my contrary analysis:
First, a couple of economic issues. Given that I don’t claim to know anything about economics, take what I’m saying with a huge grain of salt.
(1) I’d argue that it’s much better to always use PPP-adjusted GDP numbers rather than nominal ones. For example, when Trump did his tariff nonsense a couple of months ago, I think the dollar declined by something like 5% against a basket of other currencies. So the nominal size of the entire American economy also suddenly shrank by 5%. But obviously no one in America noticed anything, so using a metric in which our economy can suddenly shrink by such a large amount without any real world impact really doesn’t make any sense.
(2) Next, consider the issue of the service sector. Obviously, many service industries are just as valid and legitimate as manufacturing, agriculture, or anything else. But the problem is that the service sector of an economy is also much easier to manipulate, so I think it’s sometimes useful to also look at the “Real Productive GDP,” namely the PPP GDP excluding the service sector.
I’ve explained this argument in some of my articles, but here’s another nice example of my reasoning.
I’d think that almost all government employees are part of the service sector. Suppose that the government suddenly decided to double or triple the salaries of all government workers without changing anything else. Obviously, the standard of living of most other Americans wouldn’t change, except that they might have to pay more in taxes to cover the costs.
But since all those service employees would suddenly be earning so much more money, the American GDP would be considerably increased, along with the per capita GDP. So unless I’m missing something, the government would easily raise the America’s per capita GDP simply by giving a huge raise to all government employees. I think this shows a weakness of the conventional per capita GDP.
However, it’s much more difficult to manipulate the productive, non-service-sector GDP, so there are some advantages to focusing on that.
(3) Here’s part of my chart from last year showing international GDPs and per capita GDP, including the nominal, PPP, and PPP Productive figures:
Note that the difference between the per capita GDPs for China and America is cut in half if we shift from nominal to PPP figures. And if we then focus on Productive PPP, the per capita figure for Americans is only about 40% above the Chinese.
(4) Here’s another factor. Roughly 1/3 of all Chinese are still rural and their incomes are very low compared to urban Chinese. So based upon those international figures it wouldn’t surprise me if the productive PPP per capita GDP of urban Chinese was roughly the same as that of Americans.
I’ll admit it’s been many, many years since I traveled to China, but based upon those videos I’ve seen of Westerners living there or Western tourists, I’ve gotten the impression that the standard of living of urban Chinese is actually pretty similar to that of Americans these days.
(5) Now the issue of Chinese demographics. I think I read somewhere that the Chinese government thinks their population is probably too high and that something like 700 million might be better, which was the total in the early 1960s. That’s supposedly the projected size of the Chinese population around 2100.
(6) Until about a decade ago, China still have a one-child policy, and after that was ended, people were surprised that fertility rates didn’t much increase. I’d think that the reason is partly urban density and the expense of raising additional children. But suppose the PRC decided fertility rates were too low and wanted to increase them. I’d think it would be pretty easy for a “strong” government to do that by simply changing tax regulations:
(A) Chinese who don’t get married by the age of 25 would have their tax rates raised by 10%.
(B) Chinese who don’t have their first child by the age of 30 would also have their tax rates raised by 10%.
I think that adjusting the parameters of this sort of tax policy would pretty easily change birth rates to whatever levels the government wanted.
Obviously, Western governments couldn’t do this sort of thing. But compared to all those decades of the one-child policy, I think these measures would be pretty easy and simple to implement.
Perhaps; in any case, it's worth a try.
I’d think it would be pretty easy for a “strong” government to do that by simply changing tax regulations:
(A) Chinese who don’t get married by the age of 25 would have their tax rates raised by 10%.
(B) Chinese who don’t have their first child by the age of 30 would also have their tax rates raised by 10%.
Article quote :
Until about a decade ago, China still have a one-child policy, and after that was ended, people were surprised that fertility rates didn’t much increase.
Article quote : " For 35 years, China enforced a draconian policy of restricting families to having only one child. "
Until about a decade ago, China still have a one-child policy, and after that was ended, people were surprised that fertility rates didn’t much increase.
“Slaughter of thousands”! Wow, sounds like a bloodbath! Let’s get more details on the slaughter from a direct eyewitness:
After the Tiananmen Square Massacre: A Reflection on America’s China Policy…On June 4, 1989, the Chinese government brutally and bloodily suppressed the peaceful pro-democracy protest movement in Beijing and all around China, resulting in the slaughter of thousands of students and citizens...https://thediplomat.com/2025/06/after-the-tiananmen-square-massacre-a-reflection-on-americas-china-policy/
Oh, ok.Replies: @dogbumbreath
“[A]s far as can be determined from the available evidence, no one died that night in Tiananmen Square.”Jay Mathews, The Washington Post Beijing bureau chief who was there June 4, 1989 to cover the Tiananmen demonstrations. Columbia Journalism Review
The Myth of Tiananmen
September/October 1998 issue
https://www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_myth_of_tiananmen.php
I already answered this question when I wrote "the American population will soar to 700 million (because of our high immigration)."
Can you explain how can USA with a current, and dropping, fertility rate of 1.7 grow to 600 millions by 2100?
To "numerate the diagrams" is not a thing. I label the X- and Y-axes on every graph, and I have headers on every table. If you can't figure out what they mean, that's on you.Replies: @theRealHun, @karel
in your own sloppy way [you] do not even bother to numerate the diagrams.
With the quality of immigrant population the US is receiving, America will collapse and become middle or low income country too. Worse than Argentina today.
This is the same nonsense Matt Simmons was peddling 20 years ago.
Pope can be any color.
Who cares? Catholicism is a pedophile crytptohomo cult.
You keep with that sicko cult.
It would be paid back with the printed money and no new debt would be created.
It would take someone as insightful and ruthless as Hitler to undo the damage done to Europe and America through immigration that is designed to replace the White populations. Politics won’t fix it because the government, the courts, and the politicians are by and large under the control of the people who want mass immigration and the destruction it brings. Look how a few Marxist judges are keeping Trump from even deporting terrorists and violent illegal gang members. You would literally have to round up the people behind this at all levels, prosecute them as traitors, and publicly hang them while using massive force to deport or kill people by the tens of millions who refuse to leave.
Not even Hitler could save us. It's been too late for a long time now. Blood, literal blood in the streets was [past tense] the only way out, and white Americans had neither the sense to realize that nor the spine to act on if they had.We can blame no one but ourselves for this unimaginable catastrophe.
It would take someone as insightful and ruthless as Hitler to undo the damage done to Europe and America through immigration...
"...the people behind this..."That's us.Replies: @HT
You would literally have to round up the people behind this at all levels, prosecute them as traitors, and publicly hang them while using massive force to deport or kill people by the tens of millions who refuse to leave.
I blame democracy for this. Only in a democracy (including in “Constitutional Republics”) can a country be ruled for decades by people who never get anything good done and who are disapproved by absolute majority of the population no matter who gets elected.
A constant in all discussions about migration in Europe is how to 'integrate' the migrants, as if an average migrant has the same potential as the average European, and it's just a question of 'integration' -- pretty much every country in Europe has a large bureaucracy dedicated to this self-destructive, Sisyphean task.Replies: @Anonymous, @so complex
In addition, the full confirmation of that model of ‘reluctant openness’ that has characterized the Italian approach to immigration, combining irregularity as the main route of access with an almost complete overlook of other important dimensions like migrants’ integration.
"Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance" H.L. Mencken
I blame democracy for this. Only in a democracy (including in “Constitutional Republics”) can a country be ruled for decades by people who never get anything good done and who are disapproved by absolute majority of the population no matter who gets elected.