Hate speech is any idea that is hated by those calling it hate speech. It’s equivalent to crimethink in the Newspeak language, George Orwell created in his novel, 1984.
Replies: @Jus' Sayin'...
In the first place the Right still fails to recognize the danger. These gentlemen still persist in believing that it is a question of being elected to a Landtag or of posts as ministers or secretaries. They think that the decision of a people's destiny would mean at worst nothing more than some damage to their so-called bourgeois-economic existence. They have never grasped the fact that this decision threatens their heads. They have never yet understood that it is not necessary to be an enemy of the Jew for him to drag you one day, on the Russian model, to the scaffold. They do not see that it is quite enough to have a head on your shoulders and not to be a Jew: that will secure the scaffold for you.
“…to paraphrase Don Barthelme, even if you’re not interested in absurdity, absurdity is interested in you.”
Although the aphorism, “You may not interested in war, my friend, but war is interested in you.”, and its many variants are commonly attributed to the Jewish Bolshevik, Leon Trotsky, aka Lev Davidovich Bronstein, research suggests that it was actually the best selling American author, Fanny Hurst who in 1941 first used the template, i.e. “We may not be interested in this war, but it is interested in us.” (https://quoteinvestigator.com/2021/08/02/interested-war/)
https://www.jessamyn.com/barth/gold.html
"I see you're a sculptor," Miss Arbor said, "that's wonderful." "What is the nature of the program?" Peterson asked. "I've never seen it." "Let me answer your question with another question," Miss Arbor said. "Mr. Peterson, are you absurd?" Her enormous lips were smeared with a glowing white cream. ""I beg your pardon?" "I mean," Miss Arbor said earnestly, do you encounter your existence as gratuitous? Do you feel de trop? Is there nausea?" "I have enlarged liver," Peterson offered. "That's excellent!" Miss Arbor exclaimed. "That's a very good beginning. Who Am I? tries, Mr. Peterson, to discover what people really are. People today, we feel, are hidden away inside themselves, alienated, desperate, living in anguish, despair and bad faith. Why have we been thrown here, and abandoned? That's the question we try to answer, Mr. Peterson. Man stands alone in a featureless, anonymous landscape, in fear and trembling and sickness unto death. God is dead. Nothingness everywhere. Dread. Estrangement. Finitude. Who Am I? approaches these problems in a root radical way." "On television?" "We're interested in basics, Mr. Peterson. We don't play around." "I see," Peterson said, wondering about the amount of the fee. "What I wanted to know now, Mr. Peterson, is this: are you interested in absurdity?" "Miss Arbor," he said, "to tell you the truth, I don't know. I'm not sure I believe in it." "Oh, Mr. Peterson!" Miss Arbor said, shocked. "Don't say that! You'll be ..." "Punished?" Peterson suggested. "You may not be interested in absurdity," she said, "but absurdity is interested in you." "I have a lot of problems, if that helps," Peterson said. "Existence is problematic for you," Miss Arbor said, relieved. "The fee is two hundred dollars."
https://www.jessamyn.com/barth/gold.html
I was wrong, Peterson thought, the world is absurd. The absurdity is punishing me for not believing in it. I affirm the absurdity. On the other hand, absurdity is itself absurd. Before the emcee could ask the first question, Peterson began to talk. "Yesterday," Peterson said to the television audience, "in the typewriter in front of the Olivetti showroom on Fifth Avenue, I found a recipe for Ten Ingredient Soup that included a stone from a toad's head. And while I stood there marveling a nice old lady pasted on the elbow of my best Haspel suit a little blue sticker reading THIS INDIVIDUAL IS A PART OF THE COMMUNIST CONSPIRACY FOR GLOBAL DOMINATION OF THE ENTIRE GLOBE. Coming home I passed a sign that said in ten-foot letters COWARD SHOES and heard a man singing "Golden earrings" in a horrible voice, and last night I dreamed there was a shoot- out at our house on Meat Street and my mother shoved me in a closet to get me out of the line of fire." The emcee waved at the floor manager to turn Peterson off, but Peterson kept talking. "In this kind of world," Peterson said, "absurd if you will, possibilities nevertheless proliferate and escalate all around us and there are opportunities for beginning again. I am a minor artist and my dealer won't even display my work if he can help it but minor is as minor does and lightning may strike even yet. Don't be reconciled. Turn off your television sets," Peterson said, "cash in your life insurance, indulge in a mindless optimism. Visit girls at dusk. Play the guitar. How can you be alienated without first having been connected? Think back and remember how it was." A man on the floor in front of Peterson was waving a piece of cardboard on which something threatening was written but Peterson ignored him and concentrated on the camera with the little red light. The little red light jumped from camera to camera in an attempt to throw him off balance but Peterson was too smart for it and followed wherever it went. "My mother was a royal virgin," Peterson said, "and my father a shower of gold. My childhood was pastoral and energetic and rich in experiences which developed my character. As a young man I was noble in reason, infinite in faculty, in form express and admirable, and in apprehension …" Peterson went on and on and although he was, in a sense, lying, in a sense he was not.
This whole exchange demonstrates once again the old adage, “Do not try to put lipstick on a pig. It will only annoy the pig and you’ll wind up covered with muddy pig shit.”
“Gennadiy Gessen” is obviously a troll and Jonas E. Alexis wasted an inordinate amount of his time–much more valuable than GG’s time–trying to debate rationally with GG.
As the Polish peasant adage observes, “The Jew cries out in pain as he scourges the peasant.”
There does seem to be a large strain of psycho-sexual pathology among Jews and this is particularly manifest in Israel. Back in the 1970s, male Jewish friends would regale me with horror stories of sexual mistreatment of Jews in German concentration camps during WW II. One story involved Jewish females being forcibly sodomized by boars. I can still recall a friend telling me this story and adding with relish unnecessary detail that boars produce pints of semen during these rapes. Another claimed that a Jewish man who rebuffed a concentration camp guard’s sexual advances had a glass rod shoved up his urethra and then shattered, causing him prolonged agony.
I later learned that these all derived from a perverse genre of pornography, unique to Israel and very popular in that country. It involved fictional episodes of sadomasochistic sex between concentration camp guards and prisoners. Often the prisoner victims were portrayed as allied POWs but this was just a cover. It was clear from my interactions with Jewish friends that consumers of this pornography invariably re-imagined the victims as Jews.
Narratives from this pornographic genre invariably found their way into the Holocaust narrative where they were incorporated along with other Holocaust myths like soap made from Jewish fat, lampshades made from Jewish skin, and Wehrmacht socks knitted from Jewish hair.
It is hard to conceive the distorted psyches of individuals who would create and consume such diseased material.
As an aside, propagandists find hasbara like this hard to resist. I remember an expose of the Soviet gulags that I read as a child in a 1950s issue of the Readers Digest. It incorporated the glass-rod-up-the-urethra story, only in this case the woman responsible was the wife of a KGB camp commandant. Not until many years later did I recognize that the whole story was most likely a propaganda exercise mounted by the USA’s deep state. The gulag archipelago was horrific but even the Soviets knew where to draw the line.
It does not help that Jews–and usually the more rabid, xenophobic, Zionist Jews–almost entirely own the information industries in the USA, e.g. the television and radio networks, the newspapers and magazines, the producers and distributors of movies, internet resources, research foundations, et al.
Besides this, Jews are disproportionately represented among the highest level managers in all of these institutions, including “government” agencies like PBS, NPR, the CBC, the BBC, etc. Here they quietly manage HR operations to maintain and ensure Jewish dominance.
There’s a powerful analogy with those parasites who destroy the host organism by taking over its brain and causing behaviors which are beneficial to the parasite but ultimately fatal to the host (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavior-altering_parasite).
The Sierra Club sold out twenty y or thirty years ago, when it dropped its traditional ZPG stance, after a billionaire bribed the Club with hundreds of millions of dollars in return for which the Club began promoting uncontrolled immigration of cheap labor for the billionaire’s many money-making enterprises.
“The demographic situation there may have reached a point where the “swooping in to save the day” quasi-conservative who comes in after the string of progtards has no chance whatsoever, no matter how bad things get. ”
I have to agree with you. What you suggest is unfortunate but most likely true.
NYT “reporters” Roger Cohen, Christina Goldbaum, the owners and high level managers of the NYT, Trump’s many puppeteers,e.g. the Adelsons and the Kushners, and all the other Zionist, neocon traitors infesting and influencing Trump’s and prior administrations.
What do all these people have in common?
What genocidal, war-mongering, fascistic, quasi-irredentist*, rogue ethno-state do all these traitors share as their primary allegiance?
Is this indicative of a broader underlying problem?
What should be done?
Why are so many afraid to ask and then provide the obvious answers to these questions?
—————-
* Irredentist isn’t an appropriate description of Zionist goals. The connection of Ashkenazi Zionists and most other Jews with the vast swaths of the Middle East, which they claim to be theirs, is tenuous at best, largely based on tribal myths, and most likely imaginary.
What no one in the MSM is willing to discuss is the real reason Mamdani won the election against all his opponents, any one of whom was better qualified than he. Despite their qualifications, none of Mamdani’s opponents was willing to do as he did and speak out against Israel’s ongoing war crimes and genocide and the support of Israel’s infamy by the USA’s Zionist-controlled government. Under those circumstances, I would have voted for Mamdani, although I loath every other aspect of the man and think he will drive NYC even further down the destructive path the city’s politicians and voters have chosen.
I do believe that if Bloomberg had done the right thing vis-à-vis Israel and run on his past record as mayor of NYC he would be returning to office.
The voters of NYC choose mayors in a cyclical pattern. They choose a string of progs until the city is teetering on the edge of total collapse. Then in a spasm of survival instinct they vote in one or two moderately conservative mayors who temporarily rescue the city. As soon as the city is once again livable, the city’s voters return to type and like lemmings running into the ocean elect yet another incompetent and destructive prog.
New Yorkers are about to once again learn the truth of Mencken’s observation, “Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.”
Thank you for raising many important points, which heretofore I had not fully considered. However, I think that writing about the end of WW II is historically misleading. We are still in the midst of an era of constant, global conflict, which involves many interlinked wars and which began towards the end of the 19th century and continues unabated even now.
WW II is just one of many conflicts within this period, which has been characterized by constant, sporadic fighting involving sometimes larger and sometimes smaller wars. WW I, the Russian Revolution, and WW II are examples of the former. The Boer War, the Spanish American War, various colonial wars, the Spanish Civil War, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the constant wars in Africa and the Middle East, and now the US/UK/EU/NATO proxy war in the Ukraine are examples of the latter. Someday, when/if this era ends, future historians will see the broader pattern and write of the “One-Hundred-and-Fifty Years War” or perhaps the “Two-Hundred Years War”.
Similarly between 1618 and 1648 a catastrophic series of interlinked conflicts broke out in central and northwest Europe. Those who lived through this time saw these as separate wars. It was not until sometime after the Peace of Westphalia that historians discerned the broader pattern and began writing about the “Thirty Years War”.
The ultimate causes that precipitated and have sustained this long period of global violence are yet to be fully understood. However, Gerry Docherty and Jim MacGregor make a powerful case in their 2014 book, Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War, that the era began when a cabal within the English elite sought a military alliance of European powers to preserve England’s world dominance against the rising economic, geopolitical, and military power of Wilhelmine Germany’s Empire. Members of this cabal, e.g. Winston Churchill, subsequently played a major role in starting WW II. We do not yet have global leaders who are capable of ending this seemingly interminable string of wars, genocides and other horrors.
Anyone seeking to understand Hitler and his place in history should certainly read David Irving’s magisterial text, Hitler’s War. Another essential text is R. H. S. Stolfi’s Hitler: Beyond Evil and Tyranny. Stolfi argues that Hitler is best understood as a man who saw himself as Germany’s messiah and was uniquely suited by talent, temperament, and the post-WW I milieu of Germany and Europe to assume that role. As a result, Stolfi succeeds far more successfully than any other biographer in explaining Hitler and his place in history.
Two other important books that help place Hitler in historical context are Viktor Suvorov’s The Chief Culprit: Stalin’s Grand Design to Start World War II and Icebreaker: Who Started the Second World War? Suvorov uses Soviet archives to argue very persuasively that Stalin was poised to invade western Europe in July of 1941. Unfortunately for Stalin, Hitler acted first and caught Stalin’s armies flat footed. Stalin’s army was much better equipped than the German Wehrmacht but the Soviet army’s offensive posture was unsuited for defense. As a result it took the Soviet Union nearly three years to regain the immense advantage it had over the Third Reich’s army in both equipment and manpower.
It is frightening to speculate the result, had Hitler not invaded the Soviet Union before the Soviet Union invaded Europe. The Wehrmacht easily crushed the western European armies it faced and the Soviet Union eventually crushed the Wehrmacht. An invading Soviet Army would easily have swept aside any opposing western European armies. Furthermore, the Comintern would have supplied Stalin with a large fifth column. All of Europe would have become part of a Soviet dominated hegemon, like Post WW II Eastern Europe. Hitler may have unintentionally been a European savior.
If you cannot make an accurate assessment of my intent after reading 1) my comment history on TUR; and 2) the actual post itself - especially the last two lines about human shields and hostages - you require remedial education in satire.Replies: @Jus' Sayin'...
I can’t decide whether your comment is incompetent satire of hasbara or just incompetent hasbara. Please let me know when you have a chance.
My apologies. I had to read the comment twice to get that it’s a satire of hasbara and contrary to my comment a very clever one.
I’ve always believed that if the original Protestant leaders, Wycliffe, Hus, Luther, Zwingli, Calvin, Henry VIII, Knox, et al., had known what their theologies would eventually create, the Reformation would never have happened.
Knox was so upset at the reigns of two female queens, Mary Queen of Scots and Elizabeth I of England that he wrote a tract condemning them as unnatural, The first blast of the trumpet against the monstruous regiment of women.
All Henry VIII wanted was a divorce and himself as the head of an English church and an intermediary between the Pope and that Church. Otherwise, Henry pretty much remained a staunch Catholic until his death.
The idea of a female Archbishop of Canterbury would certainly have fried the brain-pans of Knox and Henry, and probably would also have discombobulated Luther et al.!
You sound like a Muslim who regularly engages in "Taqiyya deception" to mislead us readers on TUR. Did it never occur to you that Hamas dismantles hospital equipment to make bombs?Did it never occur to you that Hamas dismantles hospital equipment to hide bombs?Did it never occur to you that Hamas uses hospital equipment as human shields?Did it never occur to you that Hamas wanted to hold the medical equipment hostage?Meamjojo and A123 possess all of the facts necessary to dispel your Taqiyya deceptions -come learn the facts!Replies: @Jus' Sayin'...
Israel apologists always argued that the only reason the IDF were destroying Gaza’s healthcare system with non-stop hospital attacks was because Hamas was using those hospitals as secret military bases. But then multiple independent reports from western doctors in Gaza confirmed that Israeli forces were entering the hospitals after the attacks and systematically destroying individual pieces of medical equipment one-by- one to make the equipment unusable. Hamas was never the target; future healthcare was the target (paraphrased).
I can’t decide whether your comment is incompetent satire of hasbara or just incompetent hasbara. Please let me know when you have a chance.
If you cannot make an accurate assessment of my intent after reading 1) my comment history on TUR; and 2) the actual post itself - especially the last two lines about human shields and hostages - you require remedial education in satire.Replies: @Jus' Sayin'...
I can’t decide whether your comment is incompetent satire of hasbara or just incompetent hasbara. Please let me know when you have a chance.
Great satire!
My only criticism is that the failed attempts to imitate Trump’s logorrheic streams of drivel display levels of vocabulary, rhetorical skill, rationality, and morality far exceeding anything produced by the sociopathic idiot currently polluting our White House.
Really now, if you had the only Christian house in a neighborhood made of only Jews or only Palestinians – who would you choose?
That’s an easy one. The Palestinians any day!! Jews in Israel have a habit of making their non-Jewish neighbors’ lives miserable, up to the point of killing the neighbors and their families and then expropriating the neighbors’ land, homes and property. The non-Jewish citizens of the New York State township now called Kiryas Joel by its Jewish usurper/inhabitants have experienced a slightly milder version of the same Jewish behavior. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiryas_Joel,_New_York). For further examples see The Book of Joshua.
I’ve noticed that with every passing day the grotesque absurdity of Israeli/Zionist/Jewish hasbara becomes more desperately surreal. This is yet another example. Further examples are the Israeli/Zionist/Jewish trolls that regularly infest Caitlin Johnstone’s blog.
Something is happening.
I can only hope and pray that you are right. Meanwhile we should all thank Caitlin Johnstone for the great public service she is doing by not letting the public ignore or memory hole the inhumane depravity of Israel, most Israelis (polls suggest 90% plus), all Zionists, and most Jews (polls suggest 80% plus of Jews in the USA).
I’m suffering from Negro fatigue. As long as they’re killing each other, I could not care less.
Everyone is highly critical of how the Swedish embassy staff acted.
When those currently managing the Swedish state chose or were coerced to join NATO they implicitly signed onto the agenda of the USA hegemon. That agenda is determined by the traitorous, Zionist parasites who now effectively control the USA’s government, information industries, and much of the economy. The Swedish government is now reacting towards Israeli atrocities in much the way as the USA’s government has for over a half century.
This will go on until the root of the problem is eradicated. I came to this realization some fifteen years ago, after the evidence became overwhelming. There is hope as long as the numbers of Americans and western Europeans who realize the truth continues increasing.
Joining the euro AND NATO just handed their sovereignty over to jews without a fight. No more neutral Sweden.
When those currently managing the Swedish state chose or were coerced to join NATO they implicitly signed onto the agenda of the USA hegemon. That agenda is determined by the traitorous, Zionist parasites who now effectively control the USA’s government, information industries, and much of the economy.
Thank you, Ms. Johnstone, for continuing to point out the obvious. Poll numbers suggest that your efforts, those of others like you, and the obvious displays of Israeli depravity available on the internet to anyone who cares are finally making headway against the nauseating indifference of western MSM and the satanically absurd assertions of Zionist hasbara.
“The lion does not concern himself with the opinion of the sheep”
— Tywin Lannister in the television series Game of Thrones
Zionists are jackals not lions. They rely on their control of the USA to provide cover for their mass slaughter of women and children. The citizens of the USA are getting restive. They are tired of Zionist parasites deciding that they should sacrifice their blood and treasure for the benefit of Israeli and Zionist sociopaths. When these citizens unite against their common enemy, HaShoah will seem like a pleasant dream.
Let me fix that for you, Israel has to be forced out of the middle east for there to be peace.
Ellison: I knew you would. It may be a bit touchy, but at least it’ll keep that Kirk story off the news.
Weiss: And the Epstein story.
Add: “and the Forrestal story, and the JFK and RFK stories, and the USS Liberty story, and the 9/11 story, and the many stories of Israeli espionage against the USA conducted by Zionist traitors, e.g. Zalman Shapiro, Jonathan Pollard, Ben-Ami Kadish, et al.”
Hasbara and not even very good hasbara.
Or perhaps you are running a false flag operation, lampooning a rabid, racist, Zionist hatemonger to make your audience aware of what a vile ideology Zionism is and what an insanely evil, war mongering, genocidal state Israel is.
If the latter is the case, I commend you on the implementation of your strategy.
I agree entirely with what you have written!
Halbfinger writes, “The war in Gaza may finally be ending, after two years of bloodshed and destruction.” He is just one among the many MSM propagandists who continue to shamefully mischaracterize the Israeli genocide against the inhabitants of the Gaza death camp as a “war”. It is not a “war”. It is a genocide
Every MSM radio and television broadcast and every MSM newspaper, magazine and other print source I run across, enrages me by spreading this outrageous lie, this perverted piece of Zionist/Israeli-promoted Hasbara. What has been happening in the Gaza death camp is not a “war”. IT IS A GENOCIDE!!!
The author at the Moon of Alabama site is a pro-Palestinian writer but continues to call one of his regular columns "News & views related to the war in Palestine" despite contributors pointing out that the genocide in Gaza is not a war. It's sad. Words matter.Replies: @Prudentia
Calling the Gaza genocide a “war” is like seeing a man beating a toddler to death and calling it a “fight”.
... shooting fish in a barrel is “hunting”. Beating up a quadriplegic is a “street brawl”. A SWAT team shooting an unarmed civilian is a “gun fight”.
No conflicts are perfectly equal, but past a certain level of one-sidedness the language of conflict becomes absurd. The daily massacres we are seeing in Gaza are far beyond that point.
They are raining military explosives on top of a giant concentration camp packed full of children while deliberately starving the entire civilian population to death. They have complete control over the enclave, and they are using that control to eradicate the presence of Palestinians in Gaza. That is not war. That is genocide.
And WHO is financing your daily anti-Israel and Jewish misinformation postings? Will you release a list of your major donors? Didn’t think so…
I don’t know who is financing Caitlin Johnstone’s honest reporting of Zionist and Israeli war crimes, genocides and other crimes against humanity, although I suspect that she truly is an independent news source. OTOH, I suspect there’s Zionist funding behind your constant stream of hasbara.
To determine the true rulers of any society, all one must do is ask oneself this question: Who is it that I am not permitted to criticize?
Trump’s outrage at China daring to respond in kind to his latest trade war provocation reminds me of a panel in a Matt Groening cartoon, “Bosses from Hell” in the collection Work is Hell. In the panel, the rabbit-eared worker has just dodged a brick thrown at him by his insane boss. The boss is screaming, “How dare you duck when I throw a brick at you!”
BTW, one reason so many of our fellow Americans are unaware of how dangerous many US foreign policies have become is that the MSM are continuing to cover up the disastrous nature of the economic wars and wars of of aggression, which the USA’s rulers are waging against the rest of the world. This goes back, well before Trump, e.g. the economic “sanctions” the USA’s rulers impose on anyone and anything which displeases them. The status of the $US as the world’s primary reserve currency is eroding as countries are unloading $US to avoid dealing with this blackmail.
At least the WSJ mentioned the true initiator and the real trajectory of the current USA-PRC trade war, even if they did “bury the lede”. As Steve Sailer has frequently pointed out, “burying the lede” has become a standard MSM technique. Often the true story in an NYT news article can be found only in the last paragraph or two. This bamboozles naive readers but can save sophisticated readers the effort of plowing through extended amounts of blather.
Polls suggest that about 90% of Jews in Israel and roughly 80% of Jews elsewhere fully support Israel’s current genocide. I expect that there will be similar support down the road, as Israel implements its future plans for further uber-irredentist wars of aggression and concomitant future genocides. these will likely continue, at least until Israel is eradicated as a nation-state or occupies all of the Levant and Middle East, from the Nile to the Euphrates and well into Syria and the Arabian peninsula. Beyond this Zionists will not be content until they exercise military rule over the entire Middle East and North Africa. Even then Jews will not be completely happy until they are assured effective domination of every country in the world.
The only way for any country to protect itself from this rabidly xenophobic, endophilic race-cult is to remove the cult’s parasitic control over the country’s economy, politics and culture. The only way for the world to protect itself is to eliminate the cult’s parasitic control over major geopolitical powers like the USA, the UK, and the EU.
I have hope. The history of Judaism is a constant repetition of hubris generated outrages against non-Jews followed by an eventual, deserved response, that inevitably discomfits the Jewish community, guilty and innocent alike.
You’d think nothing of that guy in the brown shirt had someone not implied something. The mere power of suggestion got you to believe that “brown shirt pistol guy” did the shooting.
Then explain why silly, gullible, highly suggestible me did not immediately fall for the official narrative which has been flogged steadily by the MSM since from almost the moment news of Kirk’s assassination hit the airwaves until the present!
An updated, extremely high tech version of a palm pistol–exactly the kind of thing that Mossad prides itself on using in its many crimes against humanity–would answer all your objections. There is something sticking out the brown shirt man’s right fist, between his ring and middle fingers, that is pointing at Charlie Kirk’s neck, and that looks like the barrel of a firearm to me. As another commenter suggests, a powerful air gun would not have a muzzle flash and an assassin trained in such a weapon’s use would be able to mask the effects of recoil. I’ll let others who view the video make up their own minds. You’ve left my other suspicions unaddressed so I assume that you’re comfortable with them. Most suspicious of all is the utter failure of any MSM or other sources of official narratives to raise and or deal with these issues. Most Americans are utterly unaware of them, although denials of Israeli/Zionist involvement by that vile, lying swine, Netanyahu, are beginning to engender suspicions.
Israeli and Zionist operations against the USA and its citizens have been ongoing since even before Israel’s recognition by the UN. I still remember my shock when sitting Shiva for the mother of a friend and learning that the mother had played a major part in smuggling some perpetrators of the King David Hotel bombing into the US and hiding them until the heat settled down. Most of those present seemed to approve of this aiding and abetting of a terrorist act.
Jews played a major role in the espionage directed at the USA’s nuclear program. A Zionist traitor stole enriched Uranium from a Pennsylvania site and smuggled it into Israel, where it became the nucleus of Israel’s nuclear weapons program and the unspeakably evil, nuclear blackmail scheme that is Israel’s “Samson Option”. Israel tried to sink the USS Liberty and kill every sailor on that ship.
Zionist traitors like Jonathan Pollard have caused immense harm to US interests and eventually get to make Aliyah after endless lobbying by other Zionist traitors. There is extensive evidence of Israeli, Zionist, and domestic Jews’ involvement in the assassinations of JFK and RFK, and the 1 September 2001 terrorist attacks on the WTC and Pentagon. The likely involvement of Israel and its domestic supporters in the USA, has been covered up by official investigations that bury evidence, draw ridiculous conclusions, and inevitably exonerate Israel and its domestic supporters from the blame and execration they so richly deserve.
I see no reason not to suspect that Charlie Kirk’s assassination comes from the same playbook and will end in the same official shifting of blame.
The first time I went out hunting with my uncles, I was taught to aim at a spot that would kill the animal with the first shot [or at least try to] and pull the trigger after that.
"There is something sticking out the brown shirt man’s right fist, between his ring and middle fingers, that is pointing at Charlie Kirk’s neck, and that looks like the barrel of a firearm to me."
The two linked items below popped up on the internet within a day or two of Charlie Kirk’s assassination.
Watch https://rense.com/general98/31fcdec5-8f27-4688-a665-446ec6e3f5b5.mp4.
Then read https://rense.com/general98/MURDER-WEAPON.php.
Then watch the video again and decide whether or not to believe your lying eyes.
These two videos are being studiously ignored by the entire establishment MSM, even most internet commentators, and apparently the law enforcement agencies investigating Kirk’s murder.
This is significant, since unless the police/prosecution track down the guy in the brown shirt and/or prove this video is a manufactured fake, the defense has a compelling alternative narrative of who really murdered Charlie Kirk and Tyler Robinson will probably be found not guilty of Kirk’s murder. An important function of the police-prosecution team is to eliminate such alternative theories. In this case they must track down the guy in the brown shirt or prove the video is a manufactured fake. There is no indication they’ve done so.
Two other things need explaining:
(1) the video—supposedly of Robinson jumping from the roof of the building from which he supposedly shot Kirk—does not IMHO show the jumper holding a rifle. Yet the rifle supposedly used to shoot Kirk was later found quite a distance away. This may prove another problem for the police/prosecution. Another problem is the narrative of Robinson changing clothes multiple times while supposedly lugging a Mauser rifle to and from the assassination scene.
(2) The odd behavior of a private jet, owned by a wealthy Zionist, which took off from an airfield near the location of the assassination and not long after Kirk was shot. The plane took measures to hide its radar signature, flew somewhere in Arizona and soon after returned. The behavior is consistent with ferrying an assassin away from the scene of his crime.
All these things contradict the official narrative yet are mostly being ignored. Police tunnel vision often leads to miscarriages of justice, either a guilty party walking free, e.g. OJ Simpson, or an innocent party being convicted. This might turn out to be the case here.
This is beginning to remind me in some ways of how many people believe the RFK assassination was executed. I don’t think any rational person who is up to speed on that case now believes that Sirhan Sirhan was much more than a Mossad patsy . Likewise, I’m suspicious whether Tyler Robinson was the sole participant in the murder of Charlie Kirk, or even the most significant. There are so many holes in the case against Robinson as Kirk’s alleged killer that I think he’ll ultimately be denied a fair public trial. He’ll either get an incompetent defense team that will refuse to raise problems, receive the same treatment as Epstein, or be made the patsy some other way to prevent any publicity that might lead to dangerous questions. This reminds me so much of RFK’s assassination, and the completely bungled investigation that followed.
The actual evidence suggests that O.J Simpson did NOT kill Nicole and the Jewish guy who was fornicating with her.
All these things contradict the official narrative yet are mostly being ignored.
Police tunnel vision often leads to miscarriages of justice, either a guilty party walking free, e.g. OJ Simpson
And then there's this:
Jason Simpson … was a deeply troubled and violent young man who did not have an alibi for the night and carried knives on his person.
Jason was diagnosed with IED – ‘Intermittent Explosive Disorder’, a syndrome characterised by extreme outbursts of anger and rage over often trivial matters.
Jason was on probation after being arrested for attacking a former employer with a knife.
Two months earlier he violently assaulted Jennifer Green, his then girlfriend.
On another occasion, he attacked a former girlfriend and sliced off her hair with a knife.
Jason’s personal diaries …. reveal a man tormented by obsessive feelings of violence.
One entry reads — ”It’s the year of the knife for me. I cut away my problems with a knife.
Anybody touches my friends — I will kill them.
I’m also tired of being Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.”
Jason had been prescribed antipsychotic drugs for his IED but had stopped taking them shortly before the murders.
Jason also had a motive; on the night of the murders Nicole was reportedly due to bring the family to Jason’s restaurant where he was going to cook for them, an event he was looking forward to.
However, Nicole cancelled the engagement at the last minute which greatly upset him.
As the sufferer of a mental illness that made him prone to exaggerate minor incidents.
For UR readers still not satisfied, click on the link below to a brief comment of mine:
OJ’s lack of injuries:
The murder of Ron Goldman followed a prolonged struggle with his attacker.
Goldman, a strongly built man more than 20 years OJ’s junior was a karate black belt and there was evidence he put up a fierce defence of his life.
Goldman’s body and fists were covered in dozens of bruises, scratches and cuts, even his shoes had cuts on them, indicating he had kicked his murderer. His battered knuckles showed he had repeatedly made contact not just with the assailant’s flesh but his bones.
Forensic pathologist Michael Baden estimated Goldman may have struggled with his attacker for up to 15 minutes. Yet when OJ’s body was examined and photographed by the police the next day, aside from a small cut on his finger, he was entirely free of any mark or injury.
How could OJ have brutally murdered two people with a knife and been in such a prolonged violent struggle with Goldman and not have sustained any injuries?
Blood and skin found under Nicole’s fingernails, as well as blood splatter on her back, matched neither her, Ron Goldman or OJ Simpson and are unidentified to this day.
Jason was never interviewed by the police and never gave a DNA sample, was the blood his?
All of the forensic pathologists who testified at the trial agreed the murderer must have been covered in blood after such a violent attack, yet only a small drop of it was found in the white Bronco Simpson was alleged to have fled the scene in.
The accused was then said to have rushed back to his home to clean up, yet the white carpet that covered the ground floor of Simpson’s Brentwood house was inexplicably free of any trace of blood.
Ms. Johnstone:
I honestly did not know of Charlie Kirk’s existence nor anything about him when this story first broke. Originally, I accepted your description of the man as a supporter of the USA’s and Israel’s war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocides, and other atrocities. However, you might want to take another look.
I’ve since discovered that Mr. Kirk was beginning to appreciate what nasty pieces of work Zionism, Israel, and its Zionist fifth column in the USA are. He had begun receiving death threats from Zionist fanatics because of this change of heart. He confessed to friends that as a result he feared he might be assassinated by Mossad or some other Zionist hit squad.
He came late to his realization of the fundamental evil of Zionism but he should be given credit for eventually getting where the evidence led him. It’s possible that Zionists made him pay the price for ultimately following his conscience in the right direction.
Some references for the above assertions:
https://thegrayzone.com/2025/09/12/charlie-kirk-netanyahu-israel-assassination/
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/what-charlie-kirk-said-about-iran-israel-islam-and-jeffrey-epstein
https://www.planet-today.com/2025/09/internet-sleuths-uncover-proof-charlie.html
I realize that none of these are conclusive and one reeks of paranoia but nonetheless they do suggest that Kirk was more complex and less vile than you still seem to regard him.
Although Muslims (and many Protestants) do not consider that Jesus is God
I found this article to be very interesting – except for the above. I’m a Protestant, and can’t say I know of any Protestant church that teaches such a thing.
The Unitarian-Universalist and creeds descended from them are one obvious example. Unitarians and Universalists evolved as Protestant sects https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Unitarianism.
“…There’s nothing to be done, they need a Nakba every now and then to feel the price”
I have a variant opinion: They–not the Palestinians– need a Shoah every now and then to feel the price. As it is we’re overdue for another.
Readers of Mr. Vogel’s essay, who are not familiar with recent events in Venezuela, should be sure to read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guyana%E2%80%93Venezuela_crisis_(2023%E2%80%932024)
I agree with Mr. Vogel’s overall observation that the USA is a bully among nations, particularly in the Caribbean, South America, and Central America. However, recently Venezuela has likewise shown itself to be a bully, albeit on a smaller scale. Venezuela has threatened tiny Guyana’s territorial integrity and underscored these threats with military mobilizations along its border with Guyana. That border has been internationally recognized since before 1900. Nothing has changed except the discovery of oil in eastern Guyana, oil which Venezuela’s current government covets. I suspect that the current US sabre rattling in the Caribbean has much to do with Venezuela’s saber rattling along its border with Guyana.
Charles McCarry (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_McCarry) spent a significant part of his career as a deep cover CIA operative. He has written a string of exceptionally entertaining, literate and informed spy novels.
At least three of these–The Tears of Autumn, The Shanghai Factor , and Lucky Bastard–can be classified as novels about conspiracies.
The Tears of Autumn presents McCarry’s possible scenario for the JFK assassination. My personal opinion is that the novel’s conspiracy is not terribly believable but the novel is still a great read.
My impression is that the Shanghai Factor ‘s villain is very loosely based on James Jesus Angleton. It portrays a brilliant, naive, wannabe CIA agent trapped within the “jungle of mirrors” and victimized by a fiendishly clever superior.
Lucky Bastard is a black comedy, in which a thinly veiled Bill Clinton is portrayed as a Manchurian candidate. If one doesn’t like the Clintons–and what decent person in his right mind would–this is a must-read.
Most of the people who died during Hamas’s 7 October military excursion from the Gaza concentration camp were killed by the IDF, Israel’s version of the Nazi SS. One has only to examine footage and photographs of the aftermath. Most of the damage–the burnt out cars and homes–was caused by Hellfire missiles fired from Israeli helicopters. Many of those killed by other means were killed by IDF thugs putting into practice the “Hannibal Option”, i.e killing Israelis to prevent hostage taking. We have testimony from Israeli survivors that this occurred.
Hamas executed a daring, disciplined, and very well planned commando raid excursion from the Gaza concentration camp with three goals: (1) capture hostages for future negotiations with Israel; (2) inflict as much damage as possible on the Gaza concentration camp guards and their infrastructure; and (3) focus the attention of the world on the atrocious conditions within the Gaza concentration camp. To achieve these ends Hamas equipped an elite force with small arms and a detailed plan of action. Unfortunately the unexpected presence of a “music festival” disrupted these plans. I also believe that Hamas leaders could not have predicted the viciousness of the IDF response. No decent person could have.
Anything else one reads about this — the decapitated babies, the brutal rapes, et al. — is hasbara, the Zionist version of Joseph Goebbels’s big lie.
I’d argue that the Seven Years War (In the USA we call it the French and Indian War.) was the first true world war. It was the first fought on every continent except Australia and Antarctica. It set the stage for all subsequent world wars by establishing English dominance and the English policy of allowing no European power to arise that would threaten that dominance.
Calling the Seven Years War the First World War also allows me to surprise/annoy people by noting that George Washington first came to the world’s attention by starting the First World War.
The conflict that is usually called the First World War or the Great War, actually began in the late 19th century , as the British policy of dominance was threatened by a nascent Germany. Like the Thirty Years War it is a series of interlinked wars which people living through them see as distinct and unrelated, e.g.
(0) the Boer Wars
(1) the post WW I British incursions into the Middle East,
(2) Japan’s war with China,
(3) Italy’s war in Abyssinia,
(4) the USSR’s war with Japan,
(5) the Korean War,
(6) the French and later American Wars in Vietnam,
(7) the constant warfare in the Levant, the Middle East, and North Africa involving Israel
(8) the many post-colonial wars of liberation and civil wars fought in Africa and South America.
(9) the current proxy war in the Ukraine between Russia and the US/NATO/EU hegemon
(10 ) Other innumerable linked wars too numerous to mention.
This latest world war has not yet fully played out. It has yet to be settled by the establishment of a new world order similar to that created by the Treaty of Westpahlia or the Congress of Vienna. Sometime after it is–if it does not end in a civilization-destroying nuclear/biological war–future historians may call it the Hundred and Fifty Years War or perhaps the Two Hundred Years War.
Yes, it's true that Israel couldn't commit it's genocide without Western support, but that does not mean it's the West's fault. Israel is responsible for it's own actions.
Second, this genocide is not Israel’s. It is the West’s. This is utterly a western co-production. Israel could have done none of the destruction of Gaza, the mass slaughter, the starvation of the population, without western assistance every step of the way.
There was never a Jewish genocide in the first place. It's totally made up. The holocaust never happened. Sure people died, the photos you see are real, but nobody was deliberately exterminated and there was absolutely no plan to do so.
The “blood libel” doesn’t protect Jews from another genocide.
Stop using Jewish made terms, such as "racism". Terms like this are another Jewish creation. Using them puts you at a disadvantage. The people back during the "settler-colonial" times were much more tribal, that is, they were tolerant of their own people, but generally not tolerant of outsiders of other races. If the West was more racist, we wouldn't be in this problem we are in now.Replies: @martyr thomas aikenhead, @Jus' Sayin'..., @Hans, @Pop Warner, @BobbyToo, @empiresofDirt, @Yukon Jack, @Alen Dirtywitz, @Darkstar, @Adam Smith
It is white, western, colonial, genocidal racism, repackaged as a supposedly “Jewish” project.
Agree.
The author is pulling a fast one, trying to get Ashkenaz Jews, Zionist Jews, and Israeli Jews off the hook for what is a collective Jewish crime. The current Israeli state would never have existed without one of the 19th and 20th centuries’ most horrific isms, Zionism. This was entirely a Jewish creation.
Once Zionists promulgated the concept of a new Jewish ethno-state imposed on and replacing the current occupants of Palestine, relentless pressure from rich and powerful Jews and Jewish organizations promoted it. From the beginning those Jews involved in the scheme realized that it would eventually involve genocide but they assiduously hid this from the non-Jews they needed to assist them. Now that the genocide is in the open something over 90% of Jews in Israel and 80% of Jews in the USA fervently support it.
It’s time to recognize that, although many if not most individual Jews are or have the potential to be decent human beings, they are straitjacketed by an appalling religion whose practice has bred a dangerous race, in aggregate the enemy of the rest of humanity.
Opening up the border was only a symptom of the disease, not the cause.Replies: @Jus' Sayin'...
They threw all that shit away when they opened the border up
Opening up the border was only a symptom of the disease, not the cause.
Agree!
The one critical thing left out of Hua Bin’s analysis is noting the group of parasites that have effectively taken control of the USA, the UK and Europe. Hint: It is illegal to notice their control in the UK and most of Europe and is rapidly becoming so in the USA.
I think this aspect is a side issue and I still have an open mind about it. The explanation I just quoted for the securing of the telegram could be a cover story, I wouldn't believe anything coming from British intelligence, and if the theory is true then an alternative explanation would have been needed.
... the Zionist Jews were behind the Zimmermann Telegram although no one in the world ever suggested that possibility until some writer 80 years after the event, someone who did so on the basis of no evidence whatsoever.
Samuel Landman wrote in 1936 and added that their cooperation had been revealed in the Jewish press at some previous date not disclosed. Research from Hebrew speakers would be valuable.
Hebrew is mentioned here and in the main text. The writers fail to realize that at the time and up through Zionist ascendancy Yiddish was the original language of ordinary Jews in Europe and America. Jewish newspapers were written in Yiddish. In 1950s Boston, where I grew up, the Yiddish newspaper, Vorwarts, still had a wide circulation. I ran across a copy once and assumed it was Chinese until a Jewish schoolmate corrected me. There was once a vibrant Yiddish culture with a long and rich history. That is yet another victim of Zionism which replaced it with a dead language and a satanically evil culture.
It is ironic that in this essay Jorge Besada several times mentions the vile Jewish Torquemada, Deborah Lipstadt, without mentioning her predominant role in permanently silencing the prominent historian of Nazi Germany and WW II, David Irving. Lipstadt surreptitiously tried to bully Irving’s publishers out of further marketing his works and wrote a book attacking him, which was published by Penguin. Irving, who was not an academic historian and made his living from his books and lectures, rightly saw this as an attempt to silence him. Friends advised him to ignore Lipstadt, who was and is fundamentally just a knee-biter but Irving decided to fight back by initiating a libel suit against her and Penguin in the British courts. He thought his case was so straightforward that he chose to act per se presenting his case. This was exactly what Lipstadt and her backers had hoped and planned for.
They’d already raised a war chest from Jewish donors that amounted to some $18 million. They planned to spend most of this money: (1) arranging that a judge sympathetic to their cause and hostile to Irving would oversee the trial; (2) enlisting a powerful team of defense lawyers; (3) quietly paying two prominent historians $500,000 to act as witnesses attacking Irving during the trial; and (4) paying a team of readers to pore over Irving’s tens of thousands of pages of historical writings, seeking factual errors. The goal was to bankrupt Irving and silence him, since in British libel cases the losing side had to pay the expenses of the winning side. In this case, if Irving lost, he would owe close to $18 million, a sum which would reduce him to penury. It would then prove relatively easy to strong arm Irving’s publishers into repudiating him. We know all this because later Lipstadt bragged about it across many public fora.
During the trial it worked out exactly as Lipstadt and her backers planned. The judge showed a consistent bias against Irving. The score of errors of fact, most of them minor, that Lipstadt’s reviewers could find in tens of thousands of pages of Irving’s works combined with the testimony of two bribed historians was adjudged sufficient evidence that Irving was guilty of biased historical reporting. The hand-picked judge effectively painted Irving as a crypto Nazi in his summation. Irving who up until that point was a highly regarded historian who made a good living from his work, was ruined professionally and financially. Before the trial the syllabus of any university course on the history of Nazi Germany or WW II would perforce contain multiple entries of Irving’s works. After the trial, Irving became a non-person.
Since then Lipstadt and her backers have followed the principle of Goebbel’s that a big lie is better than a small one. The best example is the movie, “Denial”. In it, Lipstadt is portrayed as a hapless victim of Irving’s bullying. Lipstadt, who rather resembles a goblin, is portrayed by the attractive Jewish actress, Rachel Weisz. Timothy Spall acts the part of Irving and portrays him as a blustering dwarf, a half-mad cross between Quasimodo and Shakespeare’s Richard the Third. This is a gross misrepresentation of Irving, who was in fact a rather tall and well built man with bluff good looks. It is hard to find an honest description of the trial and its aftermath. The internet is full of anti-Irving propaganda. However, if one digs deep enough one can uncover the truth.
What's your source on that information, especially the dollars involved?
They’d already raised a war chest from Jewish donors that amounted to some $18 million. They planned to spend most of this money: (1) arranging that a judge sympathetic to their cause and hostile to Irving would oversee the trial; (2) enlisting a powerful team of defense lawyers; (3) quietly paying two prominent historians $500,000 to act as witnesses attacking Irving during the trial; and (4) paying a team of readers to pore over Irving’s tens of thousands of pages of historical writings, seeking factual errors.
How do you know that ‘Cindy Steinberg’ is not a purely a fictitious entity designed to provoke this sort of response?
The same way we suspect you’re hasbara.
The Samson Option is another kike fairytale
Unfortunately, I believe that you are wrong. Zionist traitors in the USA gave Israel the materials to start its nuclear arsenal. US, UK, Russian, and other intelligence agencies agree that Israel has since then amassed a sizable arsenal of nuclear weapons, probably on the order of one hundred or so. Israel also has multiple delivery systems for these weapons. Finally, reliable intelligence sources believe that Israel may already have pre-placed some of these in locations that would be targeted if Israel chose to exercise the so-called “Samson Option”. These locations may include “blackmail sites”, e.g. locations in western Europe and maybe even the Americas that Israel might threaten with nuclear retaliation under certain circumstances,
Whether Israel would dare to use any of these is an open question. The rabid paranoia and extreme xenophobia which seem to be a genetic traits of the Jewish population at large–most recently exhibited in Israel’s genocidal campaigns against Palestinians in the Gaza and West Bank and Israel’s many aggressions, war crimes, and crimes against humanity in the Levant and middle East–suggest that Israel might indeed dare, if pressed hard enough.
This reminds me of the assassination of Ernst vom Rath by Herschel Grynszpan. The Nazis used it as an excuse to increase pressure on German Jews (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kristallnacht). I’m sure the Zionist Israeli scum will likewise use this as an excuse for increasing their genocidal oppression of Palestinians. Like Nazi Germany, Zionist Israel delenda est.
I worked as an epidemiologist/statistical programmer in a major state Department of Public Health. Back around 1990 I informed my superiors that opioids (prescription, Heroin, and an early synthetic, China White) had replaced Cocaine as the major drug problem, next to alcohol. Nothing was done. Ten years later as opioid users turned to pure, street level Heroin (it was cheaper than Oxycontin and other Px opioids), the politicians began making noises. Ten years after that, as tens of thousands of their constituents began OD’ing, the politicians rushed into action. We had told them that Fentanyl and Carfentanyl were the primary culprits. Heroin was so pure and Px opioids well enough understood that addicts weren’t OD’ing nearly as much on these as Fentanyl and Fentanyl-adulterated drugs. We added that Heroin and illicit use of Px opioids blunted the problem by preventing some use of Fentanyl. The politicians and top level DPH administrators failed to heed our advice and made Px opioids extremely hard to obtain. Fentanyl OD deaths continued to rise.
There is a very big difference between legislation and laws as they ultimately appear, e.g. in the United States Code (USC). Legislation is almost always written as directions on how to edit existing law. Even when entirely new law is being written this often requires editing existing law, e.g. definitions of terms. As a result, legislation is usually unreadable. One of the main tasks of the Congressional Research Service (CRS) is to prepare products that allow congress critters to understand the legislation, which they must eventually support or oppose.
Thanks for pointing out this serious error. The Torah (Pentateuch) is the first five books of the TaNaKh (Jewish/Rabbinic Old Testament), i.e. Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy.
Genesis is a redacted compilation of various tribal origin myths and mostly benign. The nature of what a friend refers to as the tribal volcano demon and the horrors it supposedly encourages show up more in the latter four books.
It’s also worth noting that the books comprising the Old Testament are different for Jews, Roman Catholics, Orthodox Christians, Protestants, and other sects, e.g. Ethiopian Christians. For one example, the RC OT contains the following “apocryphal” sections: parts of the Book of Daniel (Bel, the Dragon, and the story of Susannah and the elders), the Book of Judith, the Book of Tobit, parts of the Book of Esther from the Septuagint version of the Jewish TaNaKh, Macabees I, Macabees II, the Wisdom of ben Sirach, and Esdras.
If one wishes to analyze this literature, one should at least demonstrate a basic knowledge of it.
No one has yet mentioned one likely reason Harris got to run for President. Joe Biden has always been a very nasty SOB and Doctah Jill is every bit as nasty a bitch. When the dimocrat establishment forced Biden to drop out of the race, he and Doctah Jill got their revenge by immediately and very publicly announcing that Harris would take his place.
There was no way the party establishment could then arrange a strategy to pick an alternative candidate without blowing the party apart. Every rational dimocrat knew Harris was a hopeless candidate but Biden made sure they were stuck with her and also made sure that they knew Biden had arranged this bit of sabotage.
Joe and Jill Biden didn’t plan on going down with the ship. They scuttled it.
Fortunately for all of us Joe and Jill will soon be roasting in hell.
Perhaps the lesson to be learned here is that sometimes it takes a bully, e.g. Trump, to stand up against other, worse bullies, e.g. the blob and its many tentacles, antifa/blm, DIE, the MSM, the MIC and deep state, et al.
Unfortunately, Trump cannot and will not stand up against the biggest bully in the schoolyard. Like most blob politicians he is Israel’s bought and paid for shabas goy, his servitude ensured by the money and power of domestic Zionists like Miriam Adelson and other Jews
Thanks for correcting Hudson’s misreadings of Old and New Testament scripture. I’m not sure whether Hudson’s mistakes are the result of ignorance or deliberate cherry picking and self-serving interpretation. In any event they are egregious.
For over two decades, I and a handful of others … warned that the … steady erosion of our democratic institutions … would inevitably lead to an authoritarian or Christian fascist state.
We’ve got an authoritarian/fascist state but, as so many other commenters have noted, it is run by and for Jews and is profoundly anti-Christian. Our next President, just like our previous presidents since JFK, is in thrall to the parasitic Zionist organizations that control politics in this country. Ditto for Congress, the federal judiciary and the federal bureaucracy, all of which have an extraordinarily disproportionate percentage of Jews in their top echelons and scattered throughout their ranks, where they set, manage and control federal policies.
Trump is utterly owned by Zionist parasites. his daughter married one and joined the tribe. All his top supporters and close business associates are Jews. Before he has even taken his oath of office he has publicly committed to supporting Israel’s genocidal policies, policies which are antithetical to US interests and hostile to traditional Christian morality.
One has to be either a committed Zionist parasite oneself or a willing tool of these creatures to insinuate otherwise.
Well, let’s just face it- At this stage, our entire “system of government” is a SHAM!
So, there exists this little battle, between the people that still thinks it’s working, or plays a part, or that the original design can be recaptured… or something.
We have entire entities, failing to fill their role properly, like Congress, and other entities totally over-stepping their role, like the Executive branch, and the blob of agencies behind it.
Part of the problem is that as it’s currently operating, this country can never legally pass another constitutional amendment again.
The bills that go before Congress are gigantic, “you must vote yes right now!” behemoths of garbage! Slush funds, corruption, payola, grift, graft, pork, and waste!
And just like the Bill of Rights, which has been completely trashed, the entire mechanisms of government, as prescribed by the constitution, have been bastardized, contorted, twisted, stood on their head..
So, periodically, you get little microcosm examples like this one, of some maniac going totally off the reservation, and others saying “but that’s not how it works”, and while true, NOTHING is working the way it’s supposed to work, so you can’t be surprised when someone vocalizes the obvious- We’ve been doing whatever the fuck we want for so long, that I just assume we can do whatever the fuck we want now.
Also, part of the problem, is this bullshit concept of “Rule of Law”, whereby we end up with States, and the Federal Government, suing each other in federal courts, so that the same corrupt judges that participate in Lawfare, or Legislating from the Bench, can rule on these ridiculous “legal” contrivances.
Literally- Point to any clearly stated part of the Constitution, and I can point to 10-20 ways that it’s being trashed! Constantly, currently, endlessly.
We don’t pass budgets, we don’t declare war, and the federal government has all but destroyed “States’ Rights” (thanks to that traitor Abe Lincoln).
The Constitution is just a stated list of rules, that everyone is constantly violating. This “country” hasn’t been a truly Constitutional Republic in over a century, and depending on how you look at it, maybe it actually NEVER was!
Little microcosm examples like this one, only highlight a tiny fraction of a government that has been cheating at everything for our entire lives.
Hell, the current admin just allowed, authorized, and funded it’s own invasion of this nation! That’s high treason, and every single person involved should be lined up and shot! Every funder, every border guard, every politician, every agency employee, and every NGO.
When we do that, then we can start talking about The Constitution, the Rule of Law, and a Constitutional Republic!
Otherwise, we might as well accept that we are not “that country”!
We are a SHAM!
Ok Steve, I will subscribe. But if you are talking about crime in 2020 you better finally bring up Peter Turchin. I have a hankering to discuss Peter Turchin. Suum cuique.Replies: @Jus' Sayin'...
Washington Post: "Why did murders surge in 2020?"
Science says that this [unnamed] guy's theory, which he keeps promoting, even though we've never deigned mention it, must be wrong. Not that we're going to mention his name.....I’m going to put the paywall here. Another 1,259 words beneath the break. C’mon, you know you want to subscribe.
Peter Turchin’s models predicted events similar to those that occurred subsequent to 2020, nearly twenty years before they happened, and at a time when an interviewer suggested that the models predicted contemporary events. Turchin stuck by his models and twenty years later their predictions proved spot on. (I’ve always had a soft spot for his models since they incorporate a demographic process I explored in my dissertation, many years earlier.)
However, Turchin predicted a period of generalized social disruption. He has always been wise enough to leave it at that. Such periods are usually characterized by spontaneous explosions of violence and criminality. The character of these explosions is not predetermined and they require some spark to set them off . Steve’s analysis pinpointed the spark and explained the character of the resulting explosion.
Both Turchin and Sailer deserve credit. If Steve is not familiar with Turchin’s work, he should make himself so.
I think I figured out the key insight into that graph on the cover of Peter Turchin’s Ages of Discord, if anyone is interested to hear it. What does economic inequality have to do with violence in a society where poor people are more likely to be obese? The answer to that turns out to be simple: marriage rates.
Finding a mate is a matter of relative wealth. If economic inequality is increasing, more men are having a harder time finding a mate. Then they become incels. And those are the guys that become violent. Why do men who don’t have wives become violent? That seems like an age old question. But it is pretty obvious when you read the incels who make light of mass shootings that that particular state of life is not conducive to a healthy regard for human life and peaceful society.
IMHO, Lipstadt is nothing but a knee-biter. She couldn’t take on the historian, David Irving, directly since at the time he was regarded as one of the premier historians of the Third Reich and Lipstadt was and still is an intellectual lightweight. Instead she launched an attack on Irving in a book, Denying the Holocaust, published by Penguin claiming that he was a crypto Nazi. This cut heavily into Irving’s livelihood, writing and lecturing on the Third Reich.
This was the first stage in a Zugzwang, which I suspect was devised by someone else, since the plot seems beyond Lipstadt’s rather modest intellect. Irving made his living from his research and writing and felt compelled to sue Lipstadt and Penguin for libel in order to protect his livelihood. Friends warned Irving that he was being set up and that he should ignore Lipstadt, who was a nonentity and whose influence would rapidly wane.
Instead Irving fell into the trap. The trial judge was openly hostile to Irving. Lipstadt’s backers spent millions of pounds and used hundreds of volunteers to sift through Irving’s many thousands of pages of published books and articles. Ultimately and unsurprisingly they came up with misstatements and errors in Irving’s prodigious output. That was all the judge needed to find in favor of Lipstadt. Irving was financially ruined and his reputation has yet to recover.
Before this no course on modern German history would have had a syllabus that didn’t include several of Irving’s works. Since then he has become a non-person in academia. It’s hard to find his books on library shelves. This is a sad loss for anyone who seriously wishes to understand twentieth century European history.
To add insult to injury, the usual suspects produced a propaganda movie, Denial, in 2016. The hideous goblin Lipstadt was played by the attractive actress, Rachel Weisz. Irving, who is a tall, imposing and rather handsome figure in real life, was played by a short and rather ugly actor, who was made up and crouched to look like Quasimodo. The entire movie suggested that it was Lipstadt who was the hapless victim and Irving who was viciously attacking her. Two Jewish friends took me to see it, before I knew what it was about. I now regret that I was too appalled to comment.
If so, you must have an extremely low opinion of the integrity of the president and his son.
Anyone who doesn’t have that opinion by now is a blockhead.
It’s obvious that one of the concessions Biden got for dropping out of the presidential race was a promise that the expected dimocrat victors would pardon Hunter Biden. When dimocrat victory didn’t materialize, Biden was forced into the embarrassing position of breaking his promises and pardoning his son for all the crimes he committed over the past ten years, both known and currently unknown.
As someone pointed out elsewhere, the closest analogy to this blanket pardon is Johann Tetzel’s papal indulgences, a proximate cause of the Reformation. I hope the revulsion against this level of blatant corruption will have a similar effect.
A good question!
What’s sauce for Trump’s goose is sauce for Biden’s gander.
The big difference is that the dimocrat lawfare against Trump in local jurisdictionshas been entirely legal bullshit and will ultimately fail on appeal. It may even take down some dimocrat prosecutors for various ethical lapses.
OTOH, the Biden mob has probably violated any number of serious state and local laws. I hope some local prosecutors will go after them for these on the theory that they should pay for at least some of their crimes.
I would like to know the reason behind the choice of January 1, 2014.
The president issued a "full and unconditional pardon" for any offenses Hunter Biden has “committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 1, 2014 through December 1, 2024," according to the White House statement.
I’m glad you’ve pointed out how insanely broad this pardon is. (Ford’s pardon of Nixon covered three years. Biden’s blanket amnesty of Hunter covers ten!!!)
The MSM effectively buried the fact that Biden has protected his son from any federal crimes–known and unknown!!!– that he’s committed from the beginning of 2014 until now. That covers the period when the US/UK/NATO hegemon started getting involved in the Ukraine and the Bidens started getting rich from Burisma and bribes from Chinese officials, subjects about which Biden pere is very sensitive. Here’s Joe bragging about committing several federal crimes to get a Ukrainian prosecutor off Hunter’s back
There’s still plenty of room to go after other members of the Biden negotium perambulans in tenebris, maybe even “the big guy”. I’m sure that once Biden and his puppet masters figure this out, more pardons and amnesties will pop up. The only likely limit is the willingness of Congress to openly stomach this level of corruption without an impeachment.
"The ton of TNT is a unit of energy defined by convention to be 4.184 gigajoules (1 gigacalorie),[1] which is the approximate energy released in the detonation of a metric ton (1,000 kilograms) of TNT. In other words, for each gram of TNT exploded, 4.184 kilojoules (or 4184 joules) of energy are released. "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TNT_equivalent1.4 ton TNT as provided by another poster is about right. Using your figure above, 5.882/4184 is also about 1.4.Replies: @Jus' Sayin'...
Assuming that the terminal velocity for a thousand kilo (1 ton) war head is about ten times the speed of sound, i.e. 3,439 meters per second, then the kinetic energy at impact will be 5,882,450,000 Joules.
Thanks. Based on the comments, I redid my calculations and realized I’d dropped a factor of 1,000. You provide the correct number.
Much more significant is that I had not realized Orechnik is a MIRV (Multiple Independently Re-targeted Vehicles) system. I just learned this here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2pqC7_eW8k. That means that the target area can be hit simultaneously with scores of kinetic payloads, each with a destructive energy equivalent to 1.4 tons of TNT. The resulting destruction could well be equivalent to that from a tactical nuclear weapon.
If all I’ve just learned is true, Oreshnik is truly a game changer. It’s time for the US/UK/NATO hegemon and their partner in crime, Israel, to pack up and go home before they lose everything.
Thanks to those who checked my calculations. Based on the comments, I went back and discovered I didn’t calculate my orders of magnitude properly. The energy released on impact is actually equal to that produced by 2.8 pounds of TNT. That’s orders of magnitude smaller than the yield from even a very small tactical nuclear weapon. However, as commenters noted, penetration and concentration of blast would probably end up making one of these close to as damaging as a very small, tactical nuclear weapon. I suspect that one could devastate a large aircraft carrier.
Rall ignores two obvious reasons to vote for Trump, as loathsome a moral leper as the man may be:
(1) The negotium perambulans in tenebris, which has been pulling Biden’s strings and is doing likewise with Harris, apparently has every intention of continuing the USA/UK/NATO hegemon’s proxy war in the Ukraine, a war which to date: (a) has consumed more lives and wrought more material devastation than Israel’s genocide and war crimes in Palestine and across the Middle East; (b) has economically devastated Europe; and (c) has significantly increased the chances of a WW III or even a nuclear war . Trump will likely end this insanely evil fiasco one way or another.
(2) As Michael Moore pointed out in the run up to the 2016 election, a vote for Trump — even more than boycotting the election or voting for the equivalent of Mickey Mouse — is a way to stick it to the uni-party blob that is currently running this country.
Taking out the absolute control that Zionist parasites and neocon chicken hawks exercise over the aggressively evil and genocidal foreign policy of the USA/UK/NATO would be a good thing but, like belling the cat, no one has yet figured out a way, short of revolution, to do it.
I realize you were using the phrase "moral leper that he is" sarcastically, but many people are not aware we elect leaders to undertake actions that are necessarily immoral on behalf of saving the republic. This is precisely what Machiavelli pointed out. Except Machiavelli has been so twisted into a teacher of evil just because he pointed this out. Yes, Machiavelli wrote the ends justify the means, but you never heard the last part of that thought. The ends justify the means BUT only in a true not contrived false flag emergency such as war, corruption, weaponized immigration, insurrection, mass treason, etc. And since Machiavelli was a Christian (yes he was Christian) he implored leaders to seek religious penance for doing evil to protect the republic, but not for doing any gratuitous evil (Palestine). Thus, we want someone who is not a puritan, or a saint, and who, if need be, can negotiate with the devil himself. Is that Trump or Harris? Harris is just an empty suit who is a puppet and just takes orders from a cabal of Hollywood-Silicon Valley monopoly oligarchs. So, there could never be any morality (or necessary evil) that can come from Harris because she has no "agency" or independence. Trump has made a career of making money in enterprises of vice (casinos, hotels, etc.). I'm not voting for Trump or Harris, but judging candidates on the basis of morality would destroy the republic and the body politic if they were expected to be a moral leader. In Machiavelli's era, the pietistic Catholic priest Savonarola was more interested in halting sodomy than in halting the French invasion of the city state of Florence, which murdered, raped and plundered the entire city.
Rall ignores two obvious reasons to vote for Trump, as loathsome a moral leper as the man may be
Gizhiiwewidamookwe.
That translates into English as “very annoying woman who will not stop talking”
Yes! It really does! She says so herself:
If we were smart, we’d close our embassy in Jerusalem and recall our ambassador immediately. Enough is enough.
After laying out the facts in a compelling manner, you end with this nonsequitur. The embassy is irrelevant. What we need to do is shut down, or at least control, the Jewish/Zionist lobby in the United States.
At the very least this would entail requiring every major Jewish organization in the USA, e.g. AIPAC, the ADL, B’nai Brith, the JAC, Hadassah, et al. ad infinitum, to register as the agent of a foreign power and to abide by all the regulations regarding such agencies. We should then seize all the assets of any that don’t and permanently shut them down.
Since polls suggest that some 80% of US Jews support Israel’s Palestinian death camps and the ongoing, slow motion genocide of all non-Jews in Israel, perhaps all Jews should be treated with suspicion as potential agents of a hostile foreign power, just as recent German, Italian and Japanese immigrants were during WW II. Any Jews making sizable political contributions with the ostensible goals of punishing critics of Israel or rewarding supporters should be treated as unregistered agents of a foreign power and punished accordingly.
Beyond this, I suspect it would be worthwhile to reopen investigations of Israel’s attempt to sink the USS Liberty and massacre its crew, Israeli and individual US Jews’ involvement in 9/11, the diversion of weapons grade Uranium to Israel by individual US Jews, Israeli sponsored espionage against the USA by individual Jews, e.g. Jonathan Pollard, and many other examples of Israeli/Jewish perfidy.
Thank you, Wyatt Peterson. I knew in a general way much of the information presented here but you have provided fully documented details that make a compelling case. Thanks also to those commenters who made on point, substantive contributions to this article.
Unfortunately, it is a sad truth that those who most need to read this and similar materials are the least likely to and, if they do, the most likely to resist the truth.
Here comes the science, bucko:
Right! Trump supporters and potential supporters are all fans of Adult Swim. Any who aren’t will be sure to check out the reference and immediately switch their allegiance to The Donald. /sarc/
Here comes the science, bucko:
….
Even if there was no character named “Bojack Horseman”, the insult is perfect.
Sorry, laddy. The words “Bojack Horseman” are utterly meaningless absent the cultural reference. A search on DuckDuckGo turns up only references to the Adult Swim series.
Ready my original comment again, sparky.The insult is “Blowjack Horseman”, which works on its own (i.e., he would be calling her a horse-faced cocksucker, but playfully) but is also as a pun on “Bojack Horseman”, which enraged MSM outlets (racism! sexism! vulgarity!) would be hilariously compelled to explain, likely with pics of the character whose (modified) name serves as a pun. Which would make the nickname instantly meme-worthy—it would have built-in automatic visual MSM propagation.Replies: @RadicalCenter, @reactionry
Sorry, laddy. The words “Bojack Horseman” are utterly meaningless absent the cultural reference.
UHarris effectively tanked her chances the minute she said she wanted to tax unearned capital gains. Everybody who owns some sort of stock, house, or land just choked at that. They all realized en masse she was extremely stupid and had no grasp at all of economics.
No one every went broke or lost an election because they underestimated the stupidity of their fellow human beings.
My impression is that the puppeteers, who once pulled Biden’s strings and now are managing Harris, are running scared. The MSM are already airing analyses of how Harris could screw up the debate and how it won’t really be her fault.
I suspect that Harris won’t come across very well and Trump–if he can restrain his baser impulses–will do comparatively much better. If that turns out to be the case, the puppeteers have two options: (1) Jettison Harris/Walz like they did Biden/Harris. or (2) Prepare for their loss with endless lawfare or even a coup or assassination of Trump/Vance.
If they do jettison Harris/Walz I will not be surprised if Clinton flutters into place on pinioned wings, cackling all the way.
She'll do to Mrs Emhoff what she did to Mrs Hickey 45 years ago?
If they do jettison Harris/Walz I will not be surprised if Clinton flutters into place on pinioned wings, cackling all the way.
Trump should repeatedly call her “Blowjack Horseman” :
What's Going to Happen at the Debate?
Please tell us your insights in the comments.
Thank you, SteveReplies: @Thomm, @Renard, @Jus' Sayin'...
Great stuff!
Trump should repeatedly call her “Blowjack Horseman” :
Right! Trump supporters and potential supporters are all fans of Adult Swim. Any who aren’t will be sure to check out the reference and immediately switch their allegiance to The Donald. /sarc/
Here comes the science, bucko:
Right! Trump supporters and potential supporters are all fans of Adult Swim. Any who aren’t will be sure to check out the reference and immediately switch their allegiance to The Donald. /sarc/
It is a proven fact that Shakespeare’s entire output, plays and poems, was written by Benjamin Disraeli, as a relaxing break from novel writing. It’s also obvious that Disraeli’s wife helped write the women’s roles in his plays.
BTW, the reptoid alien who posed as Queen Elizabeth II, has now eaten King Charles’s innards and inhabits his skin, just as he did Charles’s mother’s. The reptoid reveals his true self only during secret meetings of the Trilateral Commission’s Central Committee.
Only deluded fools can deny these facts.
A lot of Jews gave their little kids to Polish friends or nannies or convents in the hope that their life would be spared, promising to return after the war to get them. Of course in most cases they never came back. One of the guys that my father was in the camp with did this and did go back after the war (by another miracle, his wife also survived in a different camp). When it was time to take their son back, the little boy, who had been going to Catholic school and had been indoctrinated by the nuns, begged the woman he had been left with (the family housekeeper) not to give him to these Christ killers.
This reminds me of the case of Edgardo Mortara (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortara_case). The Mortara family were Jews living in the Papal States before the Risorgimento. A Catholic maid claimed to have baptized their son, Edgardo. Under the laws of the Papal States non-Catholics could not raise a Christian child, so Edgardo was taken from his family and became a ward of the Pope. Ultimately he was ordained as a priest. Although in later years Edgardo was reconciled to some degree with his family, he remained a Catholic priest and apparently hoped for their conversion.
Here's one today, from your very own country. She gave the answers for the promotion test to black officers "to combat systemic racism."https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/08/29/02/89041775-0-image-a-49_1724893271662.jpgPolice force's first ever black female superintendent is demoted over cheating scheme to help fellow minority cops get promotedhttps://mol.im/a/13790525#i-49ef9645c485b9d7Replies: @Almost Missouri, @Jus' Sayin'...
I’m an outsider here but wouldn’t a more recent example be more effective?
Police force’s first ever black female superintendent is demoted over cheating scheme to help fellow minority cops get promoted
Unfortunately, this is all too typical.
A recently deceased friend and colleague, a highly respected professional in criminal justice policy and an extreme liberal, once confided that high rates of corruption among minority, i.e. Negro and Hispanic, police officers is a well known problem. He added that researching this problem would destroy the career of any professional in the field, so it is ignored .
How would one even go about researching it? Where would one obtain information?Replies: @J.Ross
He added that researching this problem would destroy the career of any professional in the field, so it is ignored.
Blacks are often at the top of the pyramid but not so common just below. When photos are available for chief financial officer, senior administration manager, or chief technology officer, they are almost always whites.
The obvious explanation is that the Negros in these scams are utterly incapable of performing essential functions. They import non-Negros to do the real and essential work.
Trump going off on Kamala today:
C’mon, you know that rather than a Kamala-Trump debate, you’d prefer to see them square off in a TV game show
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/07/27/01/87830399-13677929-image-a-17_1722041000488.jpg
“I call her Blowjack Horseman… have you seen her face? She looks like a contender for the Derby. The great Kentucky Derby. Blowjack Horseman. How do you say her name? It is Comma, Camela, Carmela… who knows. I think it’s Camel-a, cause when she started her career every day was hump day. Every day was hump day. It’s true… Fox News called her the “Hawk Tuah” candidate. I don’t even know what that means… is that Elizabeth Warren’s Indian name?—No more ‘Pocahontas’, her spirit animal is Hawk Tuah.”
Here’s yet another recent, disastrous mouth fart from Trump: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/27/trump-speech-no-need-to-vote-future
BTW, I suspect that most of Trump’s audience will be unaware that in the speech which JIE quotes, Trump is referencing Bojack Horseman, the eponymous hero of an adult comedy animation series (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BoJack_Horseman), and that “Hawk Tuah” is a disgusting internet meme regarding fellatio. Both the speech and the referenced series and meme are likely to disgust the conservative Christian component of Trump’s base, especially after they track them down.
The charitable conclusion is that Trump is suffering from the after-effects of a traumatic brain injury, resulting from the grazing near miss during the recent assassination attempt.
Either that or he has sold out to the blob and is planning to deliberately throw the race.
Trump going off on Kamala today:
C’mon, you know that rather than a Kamala-Trump debate, you’d prefer to see them square off in a TV game show
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/07/27/01/87830399-13677929-image-a-17_1722041000488.jpg
“I call her Blowjack Horseman… have you seen her face? She looks like a contender for the Derby. The great Kentucky Derby. Blowjack Horseman. How do you say her name? It is Comma, Camela, Carmela… who knows. I think it’s Camel-a, cause when she started her career every day was hump day. Every day was hump day. It’s true… Fox News called her the “Hawk Tuah” candidate. I don’t even know what that means… is that Elizabeth Warren’s Indian name?—No more ‘Pocahontas’, her spirit animal is Hawk Tuah.”
I’m planning to vote for Trump, solely because he is the lesser of two evils but I suspect that this kind of gutter talk will wind up losing a lot of votes, particularly among women. Trump can’t seem to rein in his worst impulses. These quotes have me thinking he is well on the way to snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.
Taki’s Magazine supports evil.
Which evil do you have in mind?
How about Israel’s insanely malevolent genocide of Palestinians and associated war crimes and crimes against humanity? How about the bought-and-paid-for collusion of our congress critters, and indeed our entire federal government in these mortal sins? There area few exceptions, like Bernie Sanders, but Antony “I come before you as a Jew” Blinken is the norm. Taki’s Magazine seems to have been hijacked by genocidal Zionists and its editorial policy seems to be fully on board with Israeli and US policy.
Like to -- but won't. Taki's Magazine supports evil.Replies: @Jus' Sayin'..., @Cagey Beast
'Read the whole thing there.'
Like to — but won’t. Taki’s Magazine supports evil.
I’m glad someone besides me has noticed. But what is one to expect in a country whose bought-and-paid-for congress critters give standing ovation after standing ovation to a genocidal maniac and war criminal.
It really is surreal. And today I've been having a bit of an epiphany.
'I’m glad someone besides me has noticed. But what is one to expect in a country whose bought-and-paid-for congress critters give standing ovation after standing ovation to a genocidal maniac and war criminal.'
Off Topic but important:
For over two decades VDare.com was a primary resource for those trying to alert the public to the dangers posed to the USA by uncontrolled borders, unrestricted in migration, and insane naturalization policies, e.g. “birth right” citizenship. The organization was a major thorn in the side of those progs who both denied and then bragged about their plans to replace the current racial/ethnic/religious makeup of the country. I first learned about the immigration/naturalization issues which VDare’s founders and managers, Peter and Lydia Brimelow, have been exposing, from a chance internet encounter with VDare.com. Since then I’ve been a regular reader.
Over the past decade, there has been a concerted effort to shut the VDare foundation down. It started with doxings and threats of violence that denied VDare public fora for meetings and other events. Then social media like Facebook denied them access and refused to allow links. The attacks became financial. Sites like Paypal and Venmo denied VDare the ability to solicit contributions. At least one such organization “sequestered” contributions to VDare. Ultimately, credit card companies and banks all did likewise. VDare soldiered on, relying on mail-in contributions.
Now that law-fare warrior, Laetitia James, has succeeded where other progs failed. She has managed to shut down VDare, using law-fare tools that failed when she attempted to take on the NRA. James, constantly subpoenaed VDare for records about contributors, writers, and other info as part of a fishing expedition. Besides requiring enormous production costs, the lists were clearly going to be used for doxing. The Brimelows expended enormous amounts on legal fees, trying to stop James’s fishing expedition. Unfortunately, in New York, it is apparently the case that an out-of-control DA has the power to conduct such fishing expeditions, even if no underlying crime is alleged. James couldn’t shutdown the NRA, which has hundreds of millions of dollars to defend itself but she has succeeded in silencing VDare, which is a much smaller organization.
This is a sad landmark on the road to total destruction of free speech in this country. Freedom of speech is dead in most of Europe and the UK. Its enemies in Germany have buried it at the crossroads and put a stake through its heart. Private organizations play a major role in these new methods of attacking free speech. Rather than encouraging this privatized system of the PRC’s social credit system we need to find a way to rein it in and check it.
You can read a brief discussion of what’s happened to VDare here https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2024/07/24/the-murder-of-vdare/. Fuller information is available at the VDare site and archives, which for now can be accessed here https://vdare.com/.
What’s the deal Brandon negotiated?
-Dr Jill president of an Ivy
-pardon for Hunter and the whole crooked family
-Big cash payoff via Netflix or something. No more access for Biden Inc to sell
-granddaughter Navy plays in traffic and disappears
Your comment, which you link to, is spot on.
The dimocrats are going to provide a lot of entertainment this August as they try to prove that A and not-A are logically equivalent, that Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia, that the Ukraine is winning the US hegemon’s war against the Russian Federation, and that Israel is not a genocidal threat to civilization and humanity.
If the curtain is accidentally drawn back and the Pritzker-Clinton-Obama-et al. Machine Wizard is revealed, we’ll truly be leaving Kansas behind.
Doctah Jill must have been promised something big to agree to this.
Hunter is probably thinking of becoming a Jew and making Aliyah to escape prison in this country. Come to think of it, probably the whole Biden family are contemplating similar strategies.
Now the fun will really begin. A lot of pressure will be applied to make Harris the candidate by the fringes that make up what Steve calls the “Coalition of the Fringes.
But Harris is probably the least popular of all potential candidates. She was getting two percent or so of the dimocrat base vote when she bowed out, early on, during the last primary season. I suspect that a large majority of Americans share my visceral dislike of the woman, based on her mannerisms, her cackle, her absurd word salads when speaking off the cuff, and her unsavory means of rising to political prominence via suction on a certain part of Willie Brown’s anatomy.
An open convention will be a hoot and a half, probably resembling Chicago in 1968.
Let the games begin!
I.e., the statement that CrowdStrike had backtracked or admitted it had no evidence involves tendentious omissions and twisting. In that sense, it's like your own comment, which conspicuously omits CrowdStrike's response/rebuttal. CrowdStrike therefore still maintains that they do have proof (and again, my first link post-dates the above article, and as far as I can tell, that is their official position to this day). As to whatever Wikileaks "insinuates", that's another rabbit hole altogether. If that's going to sway you, you might as well listen to what OJ "insinuates" about the real killers of Nicole Brown Simpson, since our system of "justice" declared he himself was "not guilty" of the deed.Replies: @Jus' Sayin'...
Since publication, CrowdStrike has responded and issued a statement for inclusion in this article.CrowdStrike Statement of Response:The suggestion that CrowdStrike ‘had no proof’ of the data being exfiltrated is INCORRECT. [emphasis added] Shawn Henry clearly said in his testimony that CrowdStrike HAD indicators of exfiltration ( page 32 of the testimony) and circumstantial evidence (page 75) that indicated the data had been exfiltrated. Also, please note that the Senate Intelligence Committee in April 2020 issued a report (https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Report_Volume4.pdf/) validating the previous conclusions of the Intelligence community that Russia was behind the DNC data breach.
CrowdStrike therefore still maintains that they do have proof (and again, my first link post-dates the above article, and as far as I can tell, that is their official position to this day).
I’ll put more faith in a statement made under oath by a man facing possible perjury charges than I will in a later, self-serving assertion by some, repudiating that man’s testimony.
It’s your privilege to do otherwise.
Overall, the dimocrat managed hearings were intended to promulgate the Russiagate hoax. Little glimmers of truth did seem to appear when minority members were allowed to question witnesses.
Glad we're clear on that. A direct apology would have been far more honest, but I suspect that'd be asking for too much.I guess, by extension, you might also be willing to listen to a Russian hacker who ACTUALLY TAKES CREDIT for the DNC hacking, even after being incarcerated in a court that is none too pleased with him? Nah, who are we kidding? Let me guess -- you've got something up your sleeve that makes his testimony totally worthless, am I right?
Henry clearly said IN HIS TESTIMONY that CrowdStrike HAD indicators of exfiltration ( page 32 of the testimony)
...Born in the Russian city of Sverdlovsk (now Yekaterinburg), Kozlovsky rose to prominence primarily by hacking Russia’s financial institutions. He is one of 50 members of a hacker group called Lurk, which successfully hacked “all of Russia’s banks,” according to Group-IB, a cybersecurity company based in Moscow. Kozlovsky was been in prison for almost a year and eight months....Back in December, Kozlovsky first claimed his role in hacking the DNC amid the heated U.S. primary season in 2016, saying he was acting on the orders of Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB), the country’s counterintelligence agency that has retained the ethos and global ambitions of the Soviet era....
Yes. CrowdStrike’s conclusion that Russia was behind the DNC hack is supported by the U.S. Intelligence community and also by independent Congressional reports. Most recently, the Senate Intelligence Committee released a report in April 2020 that validated the previous conclusions of the Intelligence Community Assessment... all concluding that Russia was behind the DNC data breach.And this is from the Times of India published 8 hours ago:
Replies: @Cagey Beast, @Yojimbo/Zatoichi, @Jus' Sayin'..., @HA
Political experts have said that Trump's questioning of CrowdStrike's findings [implicating Russia] were meant the undermine the established narrative of Russian interference, which had been supported by multiple US investigations...Trump's assertions also ignited a series of conspiracy theories that suggested the DNC had somehow fabricated the hacking incident....These theories persisted despite CrowdStrike's transparent methodology in handling the investigation, which involved creating forensic images of the DNC servers...a standard practice in cybersecurity investigations.
“We heard of it in 2016 when the DNC brought it in to figure out who hacked their server. Crowdstrike declared, “Russia! Russia! Russia!”, as that was the thing to do at the time. Later, Crowdstrike admitted it had no evidence to support that.”
Do you have a source for that alleged backtracking admission? This is from Crowdstrike’s own website (as of 2000):
….
And this is from the Times of India published 8 hours ago:
And this is a report on testimony from CrowdStrike’s president of services and chief security officer Shawn Henry before the US House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence in December 2017, admitting that CrowdStrike had absolutely no evidence that Russia was involved in the DNC mail hack. https://itwire.com/business-it-news/security/crowdstrike-chief-admits-no-proof-that-russia-exfiltrated-dnc-emails.html.
As Wikileaks insinuated, it was probably an inside job by Seth Rich, who paid for his “sin” a bit later https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/seth-rich-who-is-he-wikileaks-murder-hillary-clinton-conspiracy-explained-a7739606.html.
I.e., the statement that CrowdStrike had backtracked or admitted it had no evidence involves tendentious omissions and twisting. In that sense, it's like your own comment, which conspicuously omits CrowdStrike's response/rebuttal. CrowdStrike therefore still maintains that they do have proof (and again, my first link post-dates the above article, and as far as I can tell, that is their official position to this day). As to whatever Wikileaks "insinuates", that's another rabbit hole altogether. If that's going to sway you, you might as well listen to what OJ "insinuates" about the real killers of Nicole Brown Simpson, since our system of "justice" declared he himself was "not guilty" of the deed.Replies: @Jus' Sayin'...
Since publication, CrowdStrike has responded and issued a statement for inclusion in this article.CrowdStrike Statement of Response:The suggestion that CrowdStrike ‘had no proof’ of the data being exfiltrated is INCORRECT. [emphasis added] Shawn Henry clearly said in his testimony that CrowdStrike HAD indicators of exfiltration ( page 32 of the testimony) and circumstantial evidence (page 75) that indicated the data had been exfiltrated. Also, please note that the Senate Intelligence Committee in April 2020 issued a report (https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Report_Volume4.pdf/) validating the previous conclusions of the Intelligence community that Russia was behind the DNC data breach.
No one is naming the Jew, therefore nothing serious or substantial will get done. As usual.
Can’t have a real country or a real politics, if you can’t or won’t identify its real mortal enemies.
Disagree.
I’m upfront that I think the minoritarian cancer is basically Jewish ideology, pushed and propagandized to ascendency by American Jews. And that the “scientists” pushing the whole anti-genetic, nurture-uber-alles, ideology** were/are Jews doing political “science” in the service of minoritarianism. (**Basically, that human group differences in intelligence and personality are the sole area in the whole reach of biology unaffected by genes.)
But there’s no need politically to run around “naming the Jew”. No, you simply attack the bad behavior, bad policies, bad ideology.
Same as with blacks and crime. You don’t “name the black”, you denounce crime, call for “law and order” and locking up criminals. If blacks start whining that denouncing crime is attacking blacks, or blacks are more likely to be locked up, you respond “Well then blacks should do better. Stop tolerating criminals in your communities—zero tolerance. Black men should work harder to keep their sons on the straight and narrow—out of gangs, off the criminal path. It’s your community, you need to fix it.”
Likewise, you denounce the immigration and open border treason. If some Jews start pointing out that you’re naming mostly Jews—ex. Mayorkas, Garland, the “Biden Administration” traitors–and pipe up with their usual “anti-Semite!”, you respond the same way: “So you’re telling me Jews have a problem being loyal Americans? Putting the interests of their fellow Americans and our posterity first? Well then Jews should do better. Patriotic Jews should work on routing this virus of disloyalty out of their community. It’s not like there aren’t plenty of Jews—like Stephen Miller—who are patriotic and want to preserve America for Americans and our posterity. Jews should do better and fix it.” The media Jews, of course, will squeal like stuck pigs when you say “disloyal”. But while Americans are ho-hum philo-Semitic, if Jews starting broadcasting that Jews in fact do find pushing immigration rather than loyalty to the interests of Americans part of their “Jewish identity”, that will just cause normie Americans to go “hmm”. It’s not a winner for Jews.
Same with anything else. You call for normality, decency, sanity, national loyalty and denounce the destructive people, pushing crime, immivasion, anti-whitism, trannies, anti-family, anti-natalism, cultural depravity etc. If someone wants to pop-up and say “but that’s who we are!”, you respond “Well then who you are sucks. Do better.”
But then you wind up with people like Ben Shapiro, or Jennifer Rubin, or the earlier Neo-Cons. They pretend to be on your side, and adopt your slogans -- and then turn you to serve their interests.
'...But there’s no need politically to run around “naming the Jew”. No, you simply attack the bad behavior, bad policies, bad ideology...'
This won't work. The day is over when whites can tacitly understand that black dysfunction is "in their blood" but not talk about it directly and instead speak obliquely about fixing communities. The Left won't allow this - their response is that "systemic racism" is the cause and therefore bad whitey has to be rooted out once and for all. The Left has forced this conversation into the open and now the truth has to be said.
Same as with blacks and crime. You don’t “name the black”, you denounce crime, call for “law and order” and locking up criminals. If blacks start whining that denouncing crime is attacking blacks, or blacks are more likely to be locked up, you respond “Well then blacks should do better. Stop tolerating criminals in your communities—zero tolerance. Black men should work harder to keep their sons on the straight and narrow—out of gangs, off the criminal path. It’s your community, you need to fix it.”
The rioting in Leeds was Roma gypsies backed up by (other) races from the Indian sub-continent.
Spot on! The current theory of Gypsy origins is that they are descended from low caste northern Indians, perhaps, Dalits, who migrated northwestward into Europe. Their low caste origins, if correct, certainly help explain their low IQ, i.e. stupidity, uncleanliness, and propensity towards theft, grifting and other low level criminal behavior.
TD:
Glad you’re back. We’ve missed your lampoons of prog think. This was pretty good. Not up to your old standard but pretty good nonetheless. You even seem to have convinced some readers that you’re for real.
Trump apparently spoke for an hour and a half. What is he, Castro?
More to the point, what is he not, Biden?
As 1.5 hr speeches go, he seemed to hold the audience pretty well but I think the length (and hour) was part of the point. Every knows that there’s no way Old Joe could be on his feet and talking (not even reading from a teleprompter) for 1.5 hrs near midnight. Joe has been in bed for 4 hrs. at that point.
If Donald is the new Grover Cleveland, Joe is both the new Benjamin and William Henry Harrison!
Every knows that there’s no way Old Joe could be on his feet and talking (not even reading from a teleprompter) for 1.5 hrs near midnight.
I really don't see how it helps.
However, the game may be changing …
People Close to Biden Say He Appears to Accept He May Have to Leave the Race
I really don’t see how it helps.
Yeah, everyone agrees that Old Joe has to be put out to pasture but what next?
They are pretty much stuck with Kamala. Anything else will be seen as a betrayal by the black base.
Kamala is even worse than Joe. Her Presidential campaign fell completely flat. Joe Biden had some appeal as Mr. Blue Collar union guy in the swing states, esp. PA and Michigan. What sort of appeal does Kamala have to this sort of swing voter? She might as well be from Mars to them.
She is an unlikable person in general. Not even Democrats like her. Not even blacks who on some level must understand that she is a big phony and not “one of them”. Obama was a phony too but he at least walked the walk, living in Chicago and marrying a black woman and having black children and going to a black church, etc. Does Harris even have a religion? Is she a Hindu or what? She is the quintessential 21st century mystery meat elite.
The Republican platform has two planks:
1. Fight a war against Iran for the benefit of Israel.
2. Eliminate the first amendment on campus for the benefit of Israel.
The same two planks as are part of the dimocrat platform and explain Biden’s and his handlers’ behaviors over the past ten months.
OTOH, Trump/Vance are both on record promising to end the USA hegemon’s proxy war in the Ukraine, while all likely dimocrat candidates are on record promising to continue that war a outrance, i.e. to the point of a nuclear war in Europe.
Pick your poison.
Few understand the Neocon/Ziocon obsession with Russia. They want that country destroyed, period.
And by destroyed we mean with a Russian-Jewish leader at the helm, one who will bring divide and conquer internal chaos, serve up a plump globalist divying of the resources (China included here, China doesn’t care a hoot about any of these geopolitics) and who will want a globo-homo destruction of Eastern Orthodox Christianity, which has remained stalwart–though not without its internal conflicts. Putin made gay parades verboten and public displays of “such literature” illegal as well. They want this traditional culture completely torn to shreds.
Ukraine is to be transformed into a New Judea in Europe. It will be the European back-up; the East European-Pale of Settlement fall-out shelter for the tribe in the event of any regional war in the Mideast.
People strangely underestimate what the Ziocon objective is in this conflict —never forget who goaded Russia into war, beginning years ago, foregoing any reasonable diplomatic efforts, and through what backhanded Neoslob methods they used. Regarding this denouement, Mearsheimer and the late Stephen Cohen have been clear as a bell in their analyses.
So for one-year Senator J D Vance to not give a damn what goes on there is exactly what the Zios and Neos want to hear.
How could the same kind of bullet completely blow someone’s head off and just make a tiny minuscule nick on someone else?!
…
Where Did the bullet go by the way? Where is the bullet with Trump’s blood?
There are reasonable answers to your questions here: https://www.unz.com/article/reap-what-you-sow-russian-reaction-to-the-trump-assassination-attempt-is-biblical/.
From the beginning I’ve thought it implausible that a bullet from a high-powered round, fired from a rifle less than two hundred yards from the intended target, could cause as little damage as Trump sustained. A 5.56 NATO round would rip out a massive wad of flesh and cause extensive bruising. Ask any combat veteran. There is also the issue of how a person with as little skill with firearms as Crooks — who was regarded as so dangerous a threat to others on his high school’s pistol team that the team’s coach would not let him join the team — could possibly manage to aim a round as close to Trump as is reported. A much more reasonable scenario is that Crooks ineptly sprayed the area in Trump’s vicinity, killing one innocent bystander, wounding two others, and hitting some object in such a manner that fragments of that object wounded Trump.
Your response to dimples is just a rant. You fail to respond to any of dimples’s critiques of your silly “theory”. Based on the evidence it is you who are a “booger eating moron” or more likely an incel adolescent, trolling the internet in a desperate search for some sort of affirmation.
Nothing about this Crooks kid’s background, in his 20 years of life, combined with his physiognomy, leads one to think he could make a near-precise headshot from 400 feet.
There is also this: https://nypost.com/2024/07/14/us-news/would-be-trump-assassin-tried-to-join-high-school-shooting-club-was-rejected-for-being-comically-bad-shot/ which suggests that Crooks was laughably inept around firearms.
That is what I mean. There is no evidence of significant range time, and he isn't old enough to have been able to sneak in a lot of range time even if he was a 'member of a club'. His T-shirt from a firearm-related YouTube channel could have been acquired in the last 90 days, and means nothing in terms of range time. If the gun club attests that he visited every other day for a year to practice with a rifle, never a handgun, then that would be a different matter. Everything about him should put him in the Squeaky Fromme/John Hinckley Jr. tier of weapons skill, not the much greater Oswald-level skill (a USMC sharpshooter, who nonetheless only made a fatal shot with the third shot) that would have taken out Trump's cerebellum at 400 feet if not for the head turn. @J. Ross :
which suggests that Crooks was laughably inept around firearms.
Maybe. But his distinct lefty physiognomy is relevant.
this guy was just trying to “show them all” what a good shot he was.
Eh, it's as if you never read the Charles Atlas adverts in the comics. As the good book says "The very stone that the builders rejected hath become the cornerstone"Replies: @Jack D
There is also this: https://nypost.com/2024/07/14/us-news/would-be-trump-assassin-tried-to-join-high-school-shooting-club-was-rejected-for-being-comically-bad-shot/ which suggests that Crooks was laughably inept around firearms.
There was no patsy and there is no evidence Ruby was working for anyone.
That Oswald said he was not going to be a patsy suggests both that Oswald believed someone was trying to use him and that Oswald planned on revealing who that someone was. Because Ruby killed Oswald we will never know why Oswald believed he was being set up as a patsy and whom he thought was setting him up.
That Ruby didn’t believe he was working for anyone when he killed Oswald does not prove that he wasn’t. False flag operations–including null false flags–are not uncommon. Again, we’ll never know because an investigation of this possibility was never conducted.
The Kennedy’s – JFK and RFK – had so many enemies that it’s difficult to decide the most likely villains. Some possible suspects include the Mob, the CIA, Castro, Vietnam’s Dihn clan, and Israel.