Well said but recipients of Soros largesse like the shit you reply to don’t care at all for the lot of the any part of the American working class. They, like the Jew Soros, are rootless cosmopolitans.
Bull-shit. Edward Herman in his ‘The Srebrenica Massacre: Evidence, Context, Politics’, gives the lie to the propaganda tropes of the forces bent on destroying Yugoslavia. It is, as with all his work, devastating for the usual suspects-including Hedges. Srebrenica was an atrocity, mass murder of fighting men (in the context of devastating atrocities by Bosnian forces against Serbs), like many others committed by all sides, but ONLY Serb atrocities count in the Western propaganda sewer. To call it ‘genocide’ when women and children were safely evacuated BY the Serbs, is DESPICABLE.
Time to treat the Jews and their illegal brown masses like Israel treated the Palestinians and anyone protesting Israel’s genocide and war crimes.
only there is a huge difference..
the Palestinians are in their own lands, just as the native born Americans, who’re finally tossing out (a few of) the illegal invaders. So in a sane and just world, it would be the Jewish invaders in Palestine, who should be kicked out, just like the criminal invading hordes in the U.S.
ICE was conducting lawful and very necessary raid to get illegal aliens out. Crazed woman inserts herself , performs action that ICE guy saw as a threat and gets brains splattered all over the car. Other than the poor dog being there, what is the problem?
Chis Hedges turns this into the "slippery slope" scenario where, if the ICE agent gets away with it, the next thing you know you'll be rounded up and sent to the concentration camps when the Democrats are back in power. I'm not buying it. We voted for illegals to be deported, anyone interfering with their arrests needs to be punished severely enough - prison, heavy fines, their automobiles confiscated - that it stops others from joining in.
ICE was conducting lawful and very necessary raid to get illegal aliens out. Crazed woman inserts herself , performs action that ICE guy saw as a threat and gets brains splattered all over the car.
This academic provides some empirical bases for the kind of approach to which you refer above:
Parson Hedges never fails to disgust, even more off than his assessment of reality.
Like his acolyte, Mamdani and his picked housing policy (((operative)))…
Deportation beats necklacing.
The ‘immigrants’ must be bloody desperate to seek to move to South Africa, given its failed state status and mass unemployment.
If China decides to follow an Asian versión of the fashionable Monroe Doctrine then Australia morphs into a Chinese colony. The Chinese take the natural resources and start settlement. It’s not clear what would happen to ethnic European Australians but they shouldn’t expect any help from the US or the UK.
This process is already well underway with a well established Chinese Fifth Column among the political and business class and a network of Chinese spies within the immigrant community. It’s independent of any obeisance to Neocon policy.
This well documented Trump history is all weird and fascinating. Trump’s ties to Resorts International, never mind Atlantic City casinos, are the giant flashing red light which warn that this rabbit hole is very deep and probably goes to the center of the Earth, so “Give up all hope ye who enter here!”
The first picture may indicate that Donald had a nose job. I also noticed his hair color varies a lot in the online photos. Is he a bottle blonde? Sheesh.
What about his brother? Wasn’t he in a Jewish college fraternity?
Trump’s ties with Judaism are so strong I wonder if his wives are crypto-Jewish? In which case Ivanka’s public conversion was more of a Lubavitcher coming out than a conversion.
Golden Dome
Golden Fleece
Golden Fleet
I’m starting to notice a pattern here:
Golden Shower?
You don't get it, do you?
The first picture may indicate that Donald had a nose job.
One lives and learns…
He was always suspect, using his ability to ‘sell’ to lead a lot of youth into a trap and misdirecting them…
https://spencergate.wordpress.com/2017/07/07/spencer-cryptojew/
Richard Spencer ✡🇺🇸
Introductions
Richard Bertrand Spencer was born May 11, 1978. His father, Dr. William Bertrand Spencer, also known as Rand Spencer, is a wealthy Ophthalmologist. His mother, Sherry Jean Dickenhorst, along with Richard and his sister – Ashley Rein Spencer Leake – are landlords of 5,200 acres of cotton and corn fields in Louisiana. The Spencer farms are subsidized by the government, and from 2008 through 2015, the Spencers received $2 million in U.S. farm subsidies. Richard Spencer lives with his parents in Whitefish Montana, in a 6,630 sqft mansion on a large lot. Richard uses both this address and his mother’s rental property as the address for his non-profit corporation the National Policy Institute (NPI). His sister Ashley is married to Sam Skillern Leake and they have two children:
Spencer family farms
A Serpent on the Tree
Richard Spencer’s ancestors come mostly from England, Germany and France, and the men in his family share an uncanny resemblance.
However, the few generations of strong Aryan stock only serves to camouflage the Jewish genes poisoning his mother’s side of the Spencer family tree. Sherry Spencer’s father, being Richard Spencer’s grandfather on his mom’s side, is Richard Dickenhorst (1923-2002). And his mother, being Richard Spencer’s great-grandmother, was Birdie M E Eckstein (1893-1972) – Jewish! Her father, being Richard Spencer’s great-great-grandfather, was August S. Eckstein (1859-1929) – also Jewish!
Richard Spencer’s family tree allows you to find the Jew!
Eckstein is a Jewish ornamental surname of Yiddish/German origin.
spencer ecksteineckstein ancestryEckstein is a Jewish Surname
The Eckstein family is long steeped in Occultism and religion. Frederick Eckstein was a Jewish occultist and theosophist, worked for Sigmund Freud and was connected to the Templars and Freemasons. He died under suspicious circumstances. Frederick was married to Bertha Eckstein-Diener, also known as Helen Diner and Sir Galahad (author pseudonyms). Aside from occultist and theosophist, Bertha championed the feminist movement of her time, writing books on the subject, including Mothers and Amazons: The First Feminine History of Culture.
Read on at site:
https://spencergate.wordpress.com/2017/07/07/spencer-cryptojew/
Trump was rightly elected by the best of America…‘supported as a rope supports a hanged ‘man”.
And this learning experience (always a very tangible thing) is what they got:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_United_States_strikes_in_Venezuela
In August 2025, the United States began a military buildup in the southern Caribbean, deploying warships and military personnel.[42][43] The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) sent a team into Venezuela that began tracking Maduro’s movements,[44] using a source close to the Venezuelan president. Plans were made for the capture of Maduro, taking months to complete. The Delta Force and other participants in the operation erected a mockup of a safe house—described by Trump as a “very highly guarded … fortress”—in which Maduro was believed to be hiding.[5] In September, the United States Southern Command began conducting military strikes on vessels in the Caribbean Sea, alleging some were trafficking drugs on behalf of Venezuela.[45][46][47]
In November 2025, Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado promised to open Venezuela’s oil and gas reserves during a business meeting in Miami attended by Trump, and the Trump administration engaged in secret talks with Maduro’s government about its oil reserves.[48]
JM: and this traitorous Jewess also declared her over-willingness to fornicate at the wall of the Roman Fort.
In December 2025, this escalated to include seizures of oil tankers carrying Venezuelan crude, with the Coast Guard’s Deployable Specialized Forces (DSF) conducting the tactical boardings in coordination with Department of Defense assets.[48][49][50] During this operation, Trump claimed that Venezuela’s oil reserves had been stolen from the United States.[51][52] These seizures formed part of the broader blockade preceding the January 2026 operation.[50][53] The US also launched covert operations in Venezuela under the directive of the CIA in late December.[54] On 2 January Trump had announced that the US military would conduct strikes inside Venezuela.[55]
See how they (like Sachs and the Globalist Far Left) seek to shift the blame on to a disembodied ‘US Imperialism’…a twwwwrick they always use, even when a majority of Americans curse their actions.
Sounds right.
Certainly something very big was overlooked. There could be no real excuse for that, given that many shots had already been fired and intentions of the aggressor were made more than clear.
BTW, I’ve been fighting against the Globalist Left for over 17 years for the kind of analysis you more or less make in your very good post.
I’ts imperialist, not disembodied but attached to Jewish ethnicity and the agendas that flow logically from that. Not ‘Imperialism’ but Zio-Dominated Imperialism full of the ancient religious-ideological trappings expected of that and moving towards a Zio World Order, perhaps centred in Israel. To do this, they’ve snatched the bodies of all the European-based nations and all the rest in their ambit.
Of course with that analysis we can easily see how the likes of Jeffrey Sachs gets it ‘wrong’, essentially covering over the truth.
See how they (like Sachs and the Globalist Far Left) seek to shift the blame on to a disembodied 'US Imperialism'...a twwwwrick they always use, even when a majority of Americans curse their actions.
In August 2025, the United States began a military buildup in the southern Caribbean, deploying warships and military personnel.[42][43] The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) sent a team into Venezuela that began tracking Maduro's movements,[44] using a source close to the Venezuelan president. Plans were made for the capture of Maduro, taking months to complete. The Delta Force and other participants in the operation erected a mockup of a safe house—described by Trump as a "very highly guarded ... fortress"—in which Maduro was believed to be hiding.[5] In September, the United States Southern Command began conducting military strikes on vessels in the Caribbean Sea, alleging some were trafficking drugs on behalf of Venezuela.[45][46][47]
In November 2025, Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado promised to open Venezuela's oil and gas reserves during a business meeting in Miami attended by Trump, and the Trump administration engaged in secret talks with Maduro's government about its oil reserves.[48]
JM: and this traitorous Jewess also declared her over-willingness to fornicate at the wall of the Roman Fort.
In December 2025, this escalated to include seizures of oil tankers carrying Venezuelan crude, with the Coast Guard's Deployable Specialized Forces (DSF) conducting the tactical boardings in coordination with Department of Defense assets.[48][49][50] During this operation, Trump claimed that Venezuela's oil reserves had been stolen from the United States.[51][52] These seizures formed part of the broader blockade preceding the January 2026 operation.[50][53] The US also launched covert operations in Venezuela under the directive of the CIA in late December.[54] On 2 January Trump had announced that the US military would conduct strikes inside Venezuela.[55]
And Putin stitches it up for Chabad in Russia.
That’s a worry.
The first requirement in politics, not least when you take on the Zio-American Empire, is self defense.
Where was his large personal guard?
Lilly Gaddis exposes the motives behind the stinking Trump’s War on Venezuela for the Jew Globalist Power…
Norman Davies is a British-born academic who has specialized in promoting the Polish viewpoint. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Davies I've written about him and included him in many of my articles/posts on Polish revisionist history.
the guy who wrote the introduction to the 2012 English translation of the third report (‘full version’), and presumably provided the biographical details for Pilecki ...
Correct link to the Business Insider story: https://www.businessinsider.com/the-story-of-witold-pilecki-the-man-who-volunteered-for-auschwitz-to-expose-the-holocaust-2015-9
Don’t leave off the “9”.
Yes, there are exceptions and the better they are for it. But these are outliers that prove the rule.
Christ he’s pathetic. Beats me how he has any audience at all.
The silliness of the cowboy hat on little Benny is all the more out of place once we realize that Jews do not engage in manual labor such as farming or construction work (especially our little Benny).
Oh sure, you might be able to point to a few Jews who have done jobs in manual labor. There are exceptions to everything. But most Jews are engaged in merchant businesses, banking or monetary schemes, political agitation, cultural subversion, vice industries such as porn and degeneracy, and subverting the law as high-priced attorneys. This is what they do best.
Meanwhile, Trump’s ever-vigilant corrupt offsiders permit this because they are ‘oblivious’ to it…
BTW, note the reference to the very moving funding by the Rabbis of the Roman Catholic and Lutheran refugee agencies to dump these creatures in US cities. A fitting alliance. Of course “E Michael’ (‘Mick’) Jones would also be oblivious to this formal alliance.
Too much ink has been spent in repeating the line that the West, especially the US manufactures have MADE Chinese manufacturing great. But why China? If slave labor is the deciding factor, there are slave labor in many parts of the world. Why these slave labor regions do not become manufacturing power like China?More important, would Mr Chow-Mein apply the same principle to other kind RISEs such as soybean production RISE in the US? China used to produced most, if not all of its soybean. But then it outsources soybean production jobs to the US to keep China's "greed is good" circus going. And at the same time, makes US soy production Great. One side's Greed, is naturally the other side's opportunity. Human greed is also one to the prime mover of human progress. But too much emphasize on any single factor is MIS-information.Replies: @meena, @JM
China saw their opportunity when the U.S had to export their jobs to keep the “greed is good” circus going, China made a tough bargain with the U.S demanding to learn U.S production secrets in exchange for slave labour...
More important, would Mr Chow-Mein apply the same principle to other kind RISEs such as soybean production RISE in the US? China used to produced most, if not all of its soybean. But then it outsources soybean production jobs to the US to keep China’s “greed is good” circus going. And at the same time, makes US soy production Great.
Not the main part of his post but significant nevertheless.
All of this was, since the 1970’s, coordinated under the Pacific Rim Strategy of “US” Finance Capital that sought to rationalise production/power in its favor, coopting all the main political actors in its service. Australia became the most deindustrialised and one of the most economically narrow economies in the world under this heavily enforced Plan.
Seminal point for evaluating geopolitical outcomes today. The old model and paradigm of land wars for conquest and occupation is yesterday and unviable. Today's and future wars are "stand off" wars, using missiles, artillery, projectiles, robotics and AI, and kinetic technology. Include space and orbital assets. This also relates to Venzuela and the fantasy of occupation to usurp the government and sequester natural resources to exclusively export to the United States. What wars of occupation has the JUSA been successful in since WW II? Was there a net gain or net loss?. Hint: that big, fat, slow, Mother Hen sitting there is one button push away to sinking, taking over 4,000 sailors with her. A 13 billion dollar ship to build, not including the assets she carries aboard. Sinking or wounding her is the knockout punch for America's standing and power forever in the Forum of Realism in the World.
Basically, the United States is saying this: that the Nazis were right in wanting to go to war against Europe; that Japan was right to invade China with the Nanking massacre; that the Nazis were right to hate Russian speakers and Slavic peoples as genetically subhuman; and that the Japanese were right to treat the Chinese as racially subhuman and to attack them.
That’s why we are supporting in Ukraine the neo-Nazi government that we continued to support right after World War II and maintain influence with their racist Nazi philosophy. That’s why, in Japan, MacArthur found the way to oppose the nascent or incipient socialist movement in Japan by working with the criminal gangs to basically fight against the socialists and to put puppet right-wing leaders there.
So, right now, you have this violently passionate female leader in Japan preparing for a war with China. The United States is trying to promote Taiwan to fight to the last Taiwanese against China, as Japan fights to the last Japanese by threatening to fight over islands in the China Sea by putting American arms and missiles on these islands, which will lead China to protect itself with a takeover. So, the United States basically is in the position of Nazi Germany in creating a new Nazi alliance. Western Europe, Ukraine, Japan, and elements in Taiwan and other countries in the same way that it used Argentina and other right-wing military dictatorships in Latin America.
And the rest of the world seems blind to the fact that World War III is not going to be fought in the same way that World War II was. It’s not going to be armies of different countries attacking each other. As I mentioned, it’ll be by missiles.
What wars of occupation has the JUSA been successful in since WW II?
Indeed.
And the same for the Russian quasi imperialism that, along with its economic failure, ultimately led to its demise.
Excluding of course the defensive Special Operation in Ukraine.
On this:
Basically, the United States is saying this: that the Nazis were right in wanting to go to war against Europe; that Japan was right to invade China with the Nanking massacre; that the Nazis were right to hate Russian speakers and Slavic peoples as genetically subhuman; and that the Japanese were right to treat the Chinese as racially subhuman and to attack them.
That’s why we are supporting in Ukraine the neo-Nazi government that we continued to support right after World War II and maintain influence with their racist Nazi philosophy.
Except in the mind of a moron purveyer of “anti-Americanism”:, it has NOTHING to do with the ideology 0f “Nazis”, no matter how hysterically proclaimed and everything to do with the economic takeover of Ukraine (and from there, Russia) by Jew dominated Finance Capital.
Over dinner, Metaxas said….”no thanks, not needed”. A few hours later he died of a mysterious “blood infection” i.e., poisoned.
Surely one of the greatest Greeks of the C20th. Veteran of the Greco-Turkish War of 1897 and the Balkan Wars (1912–13), he also tried to keep Greece out of the horrific “Great” War.
His “NO” to the Italians…actually…Wikipedia:
Metaxas’s efforts to keep Greece out of war came undone when Mussolini demanded occupation rights to strategic Greek sites. When Italian Ambassador Emanuele Grazzi visited Metaxas’s residence and presented these demands on the night of 28 October 1940, Metaxas curtly replied in French (the language of diplomacy), Alors, c’est la guerre (“So it’s war”).[72]
A popular story, promoted by Metaxas’s widow Lela, was he simply told Grazzi Ochi!” (“No!”) and the image of Metaxas shouting “ochi!” upon the presentation of the Italian ultimatum made the previously unpopular prime minister into a national hero.[72] The single word “Ochi” and all it symbolizes has become iconic in Greek culture. In Nicosia, Cyprus, there is even an “Ochi Square,” now the site of a popular regular farmer’s market.[73]
A few hours later, Italy invaded Greece from Albania and started the Greco-Italian War.
showed the depth of his patriotism.
Thanks.
That’s an interesting and critical slice of WWII history.
Nonsense!
Why don’t you say what you really think: that you disagree with his assessment of Blacks?
Oi vey, Michael!
You forgot to mention Trump’s trump card to shore up American hegemony by loading it with Jeets and their ilk and being an instrument of The Jew Money Power…like this:
The creep was openly a pædophile and could be so only in a peædophile haven such as Sri Lanka. He had a big house in amongst the diplomatic mansions, with a big pool in the backyard. I have it on good authority (diplomat neighbours) that the pool was frequented by male children. He famously justified pædophilia with post-pubertal boys.
Like a disproportionate number of people in science fiction, Arthur C. Clarke was a pedophile and I think the “children … playing in the waves” aren’t there in his blasphemous story just to set up the punch-line. Clarke settled on the tropical island of Sri Lanka in 1956, the year after he published “The Star.” Leftist Wikipedia says that he moved there “to pursue his interest in scuba diving.” I think that the move was also — and more importantly — to pursue his interest in undressed children playing in warm water.
‘…only in a peædophile haven such as Sri Lanka.’
True. In Sri Lanka ‘The Temple’ is synonymous with paedophilia.
What interests me far more than this provocative and polarizing remark from Mr. Crowley, is the picture of Shapiro in the 10 gallon hat.
It looks like he stepped right out of a Der Stürmer piece caricaturing a Jew in the Wild West who sells fire water and repeatin’ rifles to the noble but bloodthirsty Injuns.
This fine young Englishman, patiently, carefully, piece by piece, deals with the heart of the issue in this ‘dia;logue’ with the High Jew, Danny Finkelstein. It comes off the Nick Fuentes-Piers Morgan ‘debate’:
He’s a real Catholic but stands before his people as a totally unifying force. Long may he run.
Thanks for your rational, secular refutations.
There is something racially sick in those who see the authorized invasion, particularly at this late stage, mainly in terms of raw ‘economics’, logistics, or ‘humanitarianism’ or even simply involving ‘class’ questions. The West is way beyond all of these considerations.
BTW, what a despicable crowd and ‘debaters’ were present in the 12 year old NY based chat put up on YouTube. The worst was the creepy Jew Kaplan; the next worse was the self serving Hindoo, then came the bleeding heart female Irish ‘humanitarian’. Ron Unz did an excellent job within the limits of the debate in raising the very neglected class issues and won it unassisted.
I don’t give any endorsement to Nick Griffin but his highlighting the self-sacrificing role of the British working class (who have by far the most to lose from mass Third World sponsored invasion and are the most socially conservative (culturally respectful) section of society and have been disgustingly betrayed by the organised Far Left/’Broad Left’) but this discussion is of great significance; Griffin was the leader of the British National Party (BNP) from 1999 to 2014.
BTW, Ed Dutton, though informed and always entertaining, has an anally retentive Toryism that speaks for itself.
As I see it, politics is like that: it goes through stages, mediated by the imperfect.
I think you're delusional. I almost never trashed a comment that has already passed moderation---probably only doing that once every few months or so---and I'm sure that the same of true of everyone else.Replies: @Truth Vigilante, @notanonymoushere, @JM
4) But later on comment # X has been CHANGED to a new number (like X – 1) by Ron Unz. (Perhaps because he’s purged a comment that originally passed through moderation, but which he later deemed no longer fit to appear).
I think you’re delusional.
Ya reckon?
It is beyond simplistic. The word you are looking for is FOOLISH.
Maybe this is too simplistic but I see Libertarianism as, in part, a religious substitute for Jews (& others) who search for a world view that provides a rationalisation for their real economic practice in society.
That's where Big Gubmint comes into the equation.
Bottom Line: We all recognise that America is a FAILED STATE today in 2025.
Well guess what Mr/Ms JM?
There has been NO LIBERTARIANISM PRACTISED of any substance in the last 100 years or so.
The U.S has gone downhill because libertarianism and Free Market Capitalism was abandoned.
Which is just how the Jews like it. They despise Free Markets and Capitalism - because you actually have to satisfy consumer needs and do so while providing the best quality product at the lowest price.
That's EFF'N HARD WORK. The Jews much prefer cozy monopolies.
The ZOG miscreants get these politicians (most of whom they have 'dirt' on), to do their bidding, to enact legislation on their behalf, to introduce regulatory impediments, tariffs, quotas and outright prohibitions etc, that prevent new entrants from taking market share away from the established Jewish oligarchs.
No one progresses through the primaries to receive the nomination of their parties to contest the Presidency, unless they have been FIRST VETTED BY ZOG FOR SLAVISH LOYALTY to their Jewish benefactors.
Replies: @JM
BTW, the most outstanding member of Congress in the post Ron Paul era has been the libertarian Thomas Massie, who has thwarted (to the best of his ability), the ZOG agenda on a range of issues.
Are you seriously going to tell me now that he's working in cahoots with the ZOG degenerates?
I just shake my head and wonder how anyone can be so IGNORANT of what libertarianism is and what it stands for, as you seem to be.
DO NOT tag all sorts of shit onto your lame post making out I said it. It is only the first quote that I made.
On the latter, in response you straight away move on to Ron Paul and the Federal Reserve. Even that is incomplete because it only deal with FAR less than the tip of the iceburg. Nearly all of the issuance of money is done through credit issued by the private banks. BOTH have to be nationalised! Ron Paul never talks of the latter which, in every sense is the essence of the problem.
BTW I notice that Mr Echo, John Wear, agrees with your bullshit, eclectic, post, something that tells me more about him than I knew, tending to confirm the vigilant and thorough Carolyn Yeager’s recent assessment of him, something I have been neutral on.
No, it's not incomplete.
you straight away move on to Ron Paul and the Federal Reserve.
Even that is incomplete because it only deal with FAR less than the tip of the iceburg.
Nearly all of the issuance of money is done through credit issued by the private banks.
But, as much as there is issuance of money by the private banks, the ZOG owned Fed is creating money on a scale that dwarfs anything the private banks are responsible for.
Summary: Interest rate are ARTIFICIALLY LOWER in America than they would be in a Free Market - absent the ZOG owned Federal Reserve or a central bank of any description.
Yes, the private banks approved the loan and thus created money out of nothing.
But absent the Fed (which artificially keeps the interest rates low - through buying long dated bonds etc), interest rates would be far higher.
And thus FAR FEWER borrowers would qualify for such large loans in a market not tainted by financial chicanery- and thus FAR LESS issuance of money would result.
Johnny, like most Americans, you are clueless about gun ownership in Australia in the aftermath of the 1996 Port Arthur Massacre False Flag/Psyop.
Remember how in 1997 The Usual Suspects disarmed Australia ?
Australia confiscated 650,000 guns.
Semi-automatic and automatic rifles and guns of ALL calibres were required to be surrendered under the new law following the Port Arthur (certain) conspiracy.
The ‘surrender value’ was determined weapon by weapon, many getting far less than $600.
Licence fees and required security and individual access to a gun licence were all made more difficult under the new legislation.
Was part of the motive in the apparent Let it Happen Bondi event (for Americans and UKOI’ers that’s ‘BON – DIE’) to further reinforce the gun laws, decreasing access?
Here’s a reasonably well defended view from a Western Australian gun owner along those lines…
Your remark is fitting of your 75 IQ.
Now knock off doing that with your cousin!
Excuse me for making a limited comment on this.
...to call the Commissar Order to “murder Soviet Commissars” (oy vey) an “atrocity visited upon Allied soldiers by German soldiers” is beyond my coming to terms with. I will counter with “It’s called war.”
I think you nailed the 'philosophical roots' of Libertarian Pacifism. Though this eclectic 'doctrine' has some value to illuminate truth, it is ill fitted as a comprehensive guide to action in the real world, least of all when the guns begin to fire.Replies: @JM
I’ll also say that your view is greatly influenced by Libertarian-ism — whatever brand of it (according to Dave Miller) you subscribe to.
Probably libertarians cannot win wars because they cannot tolerate “group punishment,” everyone must be responsible for their own personal actions only. If you accept that, how can you take part in the actual world as it functions? You’re a sitting duck. That’s why goody-goody libertarians are against war…on principle.
Maybe this is too simplistic but I see Libertarianism as, in part, a religious substitute for Jews (& others) who search for a world view that provides a rationalisation for their real economic practice in society.
Greed is great, provided it is extra- (Gentile?) state that must NOT intervene in the “FREE MARKET”?.
Was it a reaction to the growth of (Gentile) fascism throughout Europe when the deeply wounded nations, East and West, fell victim to the pillaging of Finance Capital and sought an alternative plan via the only other option within bourgeois society…the powerfully reinforced, highly partisan, STATE, armed against the principal, incipient, enemy: International (really Cosmopolitan) Finance?
It is beyond simplistic. The word you are looking for is FOOLISH.
Maybe this is too simplistic but I see Libertarianism as, in part, a religious substitute for Jews (& others) who search for a world view that provides a rationalisation for their real economic practice in society.
That's where Big Gubmint comes into the equation.
Bottom Line: We all recognise that America is a FAILED STATE today in 2025.
Well guess what Mr/Ms JM?
There has been NO LIBERTARIANISM PRACTISED of any substance in the last 100 years or so.
The U.S has gone downhill because libertarianism and Free Market Capitalism was abandoned.
Which is just how the Jews like it. They despise Free Markets and Capitalism - because you actually have to satisfy consumer needs and do so while providing the best quality product at the lowest price.
That's EFF'N HARD WORK. The Jews much prefer cozy monopolies.
The ZOG miscreants get these politicians (most of whom they have 'dirt' on), to do their bidding, to enact legislation on their behalf, to introduce regulatory impediments, tariffs, quotas and outright prohibitions etc, that prevent new entrants from taking market share away from the established Jewish oligarchs.
No one progresses through the primaries to receive the nomination of their parties to contest the Presidency, unless they have been FIRST VETTED BY ZOG FOR SLAVISH LOYALTY to their Jewish benefactors.
Replies: @JM
BTW, the most outstanding member of Congress in the post Ron Paul era has been the libertarian Thomas Massie, who has thwarted (to the best of his ability), the ZOG agenda on a range of issues.
Are you seriously going to tell me now that he's working in cahoots with the ZOG degenerates?
I just shake my head and wonder how anyone can be so IGNORANT of what libertarianism is and what it stands for, as you seem to be.
LOL. Like you give a fuck.To all you dumb fucks cheering this on, remember, these shitskins want to kill Whitey as much as they want to kill Jews. How many Whites were wounded or killed at Bondi? Ally with the mud creatures at your own peril.Replies: @JM, @Felpudinho
let alone be committing the most extreme genocide in history
A discussion worthy of consideration:
Thanks for the synopsis.
After that, I don’t think I’ll be bothered to watch it. Your review is like Leonard Maltin’s Movie Guide. How many hours have I rescued from my short life by following that! And now…you!
Thanks.
To an Australian of my ilk, these two Jews are totally unconvincing. They’re a bloody joke, only exceeded by the wonder that they have any public profile at all other than as laughing clowns at the fair.
The disappointment is that some publicly minded citizens don’t tar and feather both of them and symbolically throw them into the Potomac.
At least Jon ‘Stewart’ (lol) had some warmth and humor in his personality and the same for many earlier public Jews.
Still better than Ben Shapiro’s whiny Jewish shrill. Or Mark Levin’s whiny Jewish screaming (does he actually think that’s intimidating?)
Nick Fuentes is a gay Mexican working for the Israelis. Seriously you have to be retarded not to see it.
I’m beginning to take the same position on Fuentes, having recently been ‘enriched’ by his triumph in the Piers “Morgan” failed gotcha chat, I viewed his follow-up JewTube videos with that amoral narcissistic establishment rat, Spencer. Between the two of these semi-humans, they sold out America and the West in two episodes.
…to call the Commissar Order to “murder Soviet Commissars” (oy vey) an “atrocity visited upon Allied soldiers by German soldiers” is beyond my coming to terms with. I will counter with “It’s called war.”
Excuse me for making a limited comment on this.
It seems to me that the Commissar Order, though formally illegal under International Law was entirely justified on moral grounds. Stalin refused to sign up to the Geneva Convention of 1929. And we know the barbarism inflicted on prisoners (and innocent civilians) by the ‘Russians’, under the direction of these same Commissars, so there was a total symmetry between these realities and the Commissar Order.
So what was to prevail? As you say, it was war.
I’ll also say that your view is greatly influenced by Libertarian-ism — whatever brand of it (according to Dave Miller) you subscribe to.
Probably libertarians cannot win wars because they cannot tolerate “group punishment,” everyone must be responsible for their own personal actions only. If you accept that, how can you take part in the actual world as it functions? You’re a sitting duck. That’s why goody-goody libertarians are against war…on principle.
I think you nailed the ‘philosophical roots’ of Libertarian Pacifism. Though this eclectic ‘doctrine’ has some value to illuminate truth, it is ill fitted as a comprehensive guide to action in the real world, least of all when the guns begin to fire.
And post WWII, immediately, the foreign policy of the USA was not about “securing” the sovereignty of various govt’s around the world. Sachs knows this. Why the subterfuge?
Because part of the “securing of sovereignty” was that of Israel and the rest is a smokescreen for that?
BTW, US support for decolonization was a longstanding conspiracy to ensure US financial control over former Empires and to prize open their markets to burgeoning US manufactures while Europe was on its knees.
this is not Machiavellian. This is how nations should behave. They should act in their own interest, and to the benefit of their own citizens. Within reason, of course, and bound by human decency.
treating other nations as instruments to be manipulated for American advantage.
You’re right over the target.
Sachs is an anti-nationalist Jew (!!!) who’s still a Two-Stater, meaning a Zionist and an Open Borderist.
I haven’t seen one 0f his contributions on Gaza where he doesn’t shift most of the blame onto the US.
‘It’s a twwwrrick: we always use it.’
‘Thirteen newly sovereign states soon adopted a constitution to pool key powers—over taxation, defense, and diplomacy—not to weaken the states’ sovereignty, but to secure it [sic] by creating the US Federal Government.’ — Dr Jeffrey Sachs
Dude, share the blotter acid. As we know today, the constitution enabled the complete obliteration of state sovereignty, to the point that the US fedgov now dictates the DUI threshold, READ-ID drivers licenses, special education down to the local level through the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), and on and on.
Mercifully, despite his excursion today into hallucinatory inversion of reality, Dr Sachs has spared us his customary lecture on the mythical ‘two state solution’ for Palestinian sovereignty, which (though it never will happen) would work about as well as the US constitution did to preserve state sovereignty.
Coming from a group of Economists-thugs who enabled the plundering of the collapsed Post-Soviet Russian Economy until Putin gave the Oligarchs their ultimatums which prompted many to leave and had some looters of Lukoil face the Criminal Courts…
…is priceless.
Annnd No – BoneSpurs is just a Meat Puppet of the Adelson/AIPAC/Likudnik Factions.
Good point. I agree w/Sachs that the US is probably ill advised to do what it is doing, at least the way that it is, in Venezuela. I also agree with his many critiques of US policy w/Ukraine.
That said, he is at his core an economistic liberal, and genuinely believes that commerce and code solve everything. Hence, his naive appeals to international law, hence his tendency to see each and every appearance of nationalism as “Machiavellian.”
He probably still believes that Russia would have been better off under the oligarchs.
The ancient “greeks” understood more about the unconscious than Freud ever did. Modern education is devoid of any general knowledge about Plato or Socrates!
Socrates famously linked self-knowledge to wisdom, suggesting, that understanding what it is that one does not know, is a key component of wisdom itself. For that you need questions and someone capable of answering them. Few ask questions today and fewer still dare answer them. The talking heads tell you what they want you to know.
“…know thyself” is inscribed at the Delphic temple.
The ‘unexamined life” is not worth living” said Socrates. This, of course is not the same as rooting around in Viennese woman’s unexamined psychological undergarments and had Freud spent more effort on the development of his theories instead of his own obsessions, the minds of western man would have been much better off.
If as much money was spent on truly educating children as is spent on the overcompensated repeating mechanisms whose lives are spent raking around in the cold coals of the received it would no doubt be discovered that many ten year olds would love to learn about Plato and Socrates, and too, would not misunderstand what they had to tell us.
I went to school in England when I was four. And the first book I was given as we four year olds entered the classroom, was an atlas. I still have it. The introduction is superlative. I remember learning by rote, my times tables, the teacher always calling each line in those tables equations.
Truly by my seventh birthday we were solving for x. Easy enough when you first use the times tables.
When we were learning about “the Empire,” my teacher may not have been completely aware of its dissolution, or every reason why. I was not. Still I wanted to know where Kenya was, since I had heard about the Mau Mau, on the BBC. She had us look it up in our atlases. It was coloured pink in the atlases.
My education as a child was in an English prep school. Then I moved to America. That is another story! In America they asked the questions and you answered them. Often multiple choice.
Oh really? My dad exclaimed. He wanted to know why my homework took me only 10 minutes.
Catholic polemicists maintained that Martin Luther worshipped the Devil.
I don’t want to harp on it but this is the ‘considered opinion’ of one ‘E. Michael Jones’ today, in fact he takes it further…
E. Michael Jones Explains Why Protestantism is SATANIC!!! | David L. Gray – Off Code & Unscripted
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNE0t_gg_Rg
I wouldn’t bother with this freak except for the fact that he has many Roman Catholic supporters, most youthful, not a few of whom post on TUR.
Strange that a Roman Catholic, let alone this half-baked academic cherry picker today has the gall to make such outrageous and mendacious claims.
‘A Catholic Priest that couldn’t control his passions’ indeed. LOL!
Nope, I'm just not.As i have explained many times, my ancestry goes back to the Mayflower.And as I have also described many times, when I was a kid, my parents dragged my kid brother and me to the local Southern Baptist church, First Baptist of Affton: to their credit, the Baptists leave it up to the kids themselves as to whether they will be baptized and join the church. Neither my brother nor I ever chose to "accept Jesus as Lord and Savior," to be baptized, or to join the church.So, I can proudly say that, despite all those years of attending a Baptist church, I was never in fact a Christian.But, obviously, I was also never a Jew.My ancestry is mainly English, Irish, and German, with a smattering of other Western European ethnic groups -- e.g., an Italian way back in the sixteenth century, according to my dad's cousin, who researched all this. No Jews that I know of.I do find it extremely intriguing, however, that you are so determined to think I must be a Jew!Why do you care? Do you really believe that some nefarious character traits are invariably handed down in some sort of distinctive Jewish gene?How... interesting.Do you really prefer a Protestant like Hillary to a decent Jewish guy like, say, Dave Smith?As I have said many times, little buddy, my main interest in this site is the opportunity it gives to study various forms of psychopathology.And, so, I thank you for helping me in that task.Your pal,Dave Miller in SacramentoReplies: @JM
BTW, I’d bet that the hyper-arrogant (surprise…surprise) David Howard Miller is a Jew. A so-called Liberal (Open Borders) Jew.
Piss off, Dave, I’m not interest in talking to those who are rusted on subversive pro-invasionists. Your history in that department is of long standing and unrepentant. So…nothing to talk about.
BTW, just one assertion: assuming the truth of your claims, I question your equation of ‘Mayflower’ Americans with non-Jews. There is a whole body of literature based on the opposite: Jews marrying into the Founder Stock.
And even were this not so, what’s so sacrosanct in the Founder identity today? I ran into one of these bastards at a university function. A more sanctimonious creature I’m yet to encounter. I almost invited the sissy outside for a punch up.
Leave it at that.
And I love you too, JM.
Piss off, Dave,
Hmmm... I'm a "pro-invasionist"?
I’m not interest in talking to those who are rusted on subversive pro-invasionists. Your history in that department is of long standing and unrepentant. So…nothing to talk about.
But, as I have explained to you, I have no Jewish ancestry that I know of. And I have been commenting on this site since December 2007, and if you look back through my past comments, you will see me over the years again and again mentioning that I was raised attending a Christian church.
BTW, just one assertion: assuming the truth of your claims, I question your equation of ‘Mayflower’ Americans with non-Jews. There is a whole body of literature based on the opposite: Jews marrying into the Founder Stock.
My experience is that guys who brag online about their ability to engage in a "punch up" are... well, is it true that you are actually gay? Just asking!
And even were this not so, what’s so sacrosanct in the Founder identity today? I ran into one of these bastards at a university function. A more sanctimonious creature I’m yet to encounter. I almost invited the sissy outside for a punch up.
Thanks NI. It’s heart warming to have such alert support for what I would have thought was the obvious.
I hesitate saying it, don’t like saying it in the Season of Good Will but the scourge of Single Issue Politics is one of the traps more worthy Unz posters here fall into. As though Gaza and the Jewish Wars was the be-all-and-end-all of this very troubled planet.
The other is the rich supply of Vatican II Catholics (and Protestant hangers-on) whose spiritual mentor, E Michael (‘Mick’ the bigot) Jones has already made a Separate Peace with the Muslim Invader and any other Third World flotsam and jetsam that has exuded through the open borders of America (nay of all European nations). And the sanctimonious Catholic bitches in search of Church Awarded Brownie Points and the state over-rewarded CEO’s are there to greet and ideologically over-support them.
Mark Felton does good videos and he touches on some upsetting topics, but doesn’t stray far.
Felton doesn’t ‘stray far’ because he’s a mainstream Churchillian.
I had a dream —
Not a dream, exactly; maybe a wish —
There’s a movement that I witnessed among Episcopal parishes in Washington, DC region, of acknowledging that their church or school or entire community is built on lands where once various of The Nations dwelt.
My dream — that whatever Nation dwelt on the land on which is now built the holocaust museum, or Trump’s destroyed East Wing, or where US Congress gathers to acclaim Netanyahu: that Nation will reclaim their ancient homeland. Demand the removal of the present-day inhabitants and re-plant themselves in their old homes.
Zionism for the Nations.
Let it be
The average American Christian believes that Islam is bad because their jewish enemies have taken control of their media and minds, and their Bible.
Zionists support mass invasion of Muslims to Western nations because they know that their behavior and demands will produce hostility among the European founder populations that will tend towards identification with Zionist goals in the Middle East. This aim has met with considerable success.
Barrett supports this plank of Zionist policy. He cannot get enough of it.
Well, well -- here comes Dave's personal recommendation of the Libertarian way of life/form of government. The only reason it doesn't work is because we don't live in "an ideal libertarian Utopia." Well, that's a quandry, isn't it? But not to Dave, who can believe/hope that one day that might change, that could change, who knows? So he remains a "hard-core libertarian anarchist" with a small group of others. Would he be a potential Antifa member, to whom any amount of violence is justified because the "old order" must be destroyed to make way for the new? I mean, none of this is off the table in the political arena or political thought. Or in modern memory.In light of this, I'll just bring attention to a piece I just read in the Daily Mail titled "Trump's warning to Europe" https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15366423/Trumps-fight-Europe-European-President-reignites-war-words-EU-warning-continent-going-bad-direction-bad-people.html. Quote:
In an ideal libertarian world, anyone would be as free to move from New Delhi to Des Moines as from Des Moines to Sacramento.
[...]
Most immigrants are decent, hard-working people. Nonetheless ... unlimited immigration means the destruction of the American Republic.
Trump is aware of this! He wants to stop it. Yes, he's right that we need some "migrants" to do the work, both high level and low, the jobs Euro-Americans can't or don't want to do. This is true. But he is trying to bring it down to a minimum. Adolf Hitler, who Dave paints as a monster, was more successful in this endeavor for Germany than those he (Dave) favors would be for the USA. It's always the Jews who are in the vanguard of pushing against it. Of course! Libertarianism is a Jewish movement bc it aids the goals/advancement of Jewry in advanced countries. I don't say "white" because white is too broad in its application. Nick Fuentes had a very good show on the subject of White vs European recently: https://rumble.com/v72ly6y-elon-musk-says-jews-are-peak-white.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp_v. Only 16 min. long -- highly recommended.Replies: @JM, @PhysicistDave
US President Donald Trump has reignited his war of words with the European Union, warning that the continent is going in a 'very bad' direction. It comes after the White House published its bombshell new National Security Strategy (NSS), which predicted that European nations are under the threat of 'civilisational erasure' and will be 'unrecognisable' in the next 20 years.
Thanks, Carolyn. You captured it all.
BTW, I’d bet that the hyper-arrogant (surprise…surprise) David Howard Miller is a Jew. A so-called Liberal (Open Borders) Jew.
That wretched breed is a dime a dozen in the US.
I spent a decade wasting my time with the Far Leftist variant of these creatures. Their protestations against the crimes of their once Grand Shibboleth, Israel, means nothing at all. In fact, give me a hard genocidal Zionist any day.
On that, in the words of Brother Kapner, so relevant the this shifty POS in his 80’s: Jews never retire.
Similarly, I began some time ago to strongly suspect that Dave is a Jew/loyal to Jewry, but without any hard evidence I would not say so, even now. But he kind of exudes it, doesn't he? His "hard core" commitment to Libertarianism, which he unconvincingly tried to backtrack on in comment #503, writing "But I now do think that I did not pay as much attention as I should have to all the features of the current world that currently makes that impossible ..." Hmmm, Really? He wasn't "paying attention?" Our brilliant, so thorough resident physicist? More likely he wasn't paying attention to the complex role he is playing here, and forgot himself in his enthusiasm for the libertarian outlook.
Thanks, Carolyn. You captured it all.
BTW, I’d bet that the hyper-arrogant (surprise…surprise) David Howard Miller is a Jew. A so-called Liberal (Open Borders) Jew.
That wretched breed is a dime a dozen in the US.
Nope, I'm just not.As i have explained many times, my ancestry goes back to the Mayflower.And as I have also described many times, when I was a kid, my parents dragged my kid brother and me to the local Southern Baptist church, First Baptist of Affton: to their credit, the Baptists leave it up to the kids themselves as to whether they will be baptized and join the church. Neither my brother nor I ever chose to "accept Jesus as Lord and Savior," to be baptized, or to join the church.So, I can proudly say that, despite all those years of attending a Baptist church, I was never in fact a Christian.But, obviously, I was also never a Jew.My ancestry is mainly English, Irish, and German, with a smattering of other Western European ethnic groups -- e.g., an Italian way back in the sixteenth century, according to my dad's cousin, who researched all this. No Jews that I know of.I do find it extremely intriguing, however, that you are so determined to think I must be a Jew!Why do you care? Do you really believe that some nefarious character traits are invariably handed down in some sort of distinctive Jewish gene?How... interesting.Do you really prefer a Protestant like Hillary to a decent Jewish guy like, say, Dave Smith?As I have said many times, little buddy, my main interest in this site is the opportunity it gives to study various forms of psychopathology.And, so, I thank you for helping me in that task.Your pal,Dave Miller in SacramentoReplies: @JM
BTW, I’d bet that the hyper-arrogant (surprise…surprise) David Howard Miller is a Jew. A so-called Liberal (Open Borders) Jew.
Then I'm very glad I wrote to you what I did, which I'm sure many "Right-White" readers disapproved of. You must watch Tucker Carlson's just-released interview with Milo Yiannopoulos titled
Had no idea Jonathan Bowden (1962-2012) was a queer, although that probably matters less to me than it seems to you.
' title='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Bowden
Have been toying with the idea of buying one or two of the books below, but your remarks raise doubts.
<a href='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Bowden
That was another big disability he had. I believe he was a good person, but not a role model.Replies: @Biggles, @JM
He was an only child. His mother, Dorothy Bowden, suffered from severe mental illness.[2]
What is said about it will make some people want to turn it off in the middle, so be warned to please not give into that urge to turn it off. I wasn’t tempted to, but Milo is quite extreme in his entire person/personality. Entirely honest, however…Tucker’s genuine commitment to treat all people with respect shines in this interview, and really, who can keep himself from liking, even loving, Milo?
Interviews like this will change the world, and Tucker is responsible for them. Or maybe his producers?? Anyway, the fact that they exist is a miracle in itself. Do give yourself the benefit of this interview and, if you wish, your response.
What a truthful, fair, high quality comment. Thanks Carolyn.
To cut to the chase, the logical flaw is that one can concede that the Jews were indeed bad without having to necessarily concede that the Nazis were good.
Step number 1 for White morons is to 🛑 calling Hitler and National Socialist Germany bad for defending itself from genocidal jews who planned to enslave not only Germany but the entire West as they had already done in the old Soviet Union.
You wouldn’t like living in Nazi Germany. Not if you happened to disagree with them. You also wouldn’t like it if you happened to be a member of some disfavored group: Jews, ex-Communists, Slavs, homosexuals, the handicapped…
I’ll bet my left nut that I’d be fine living in Nazi Germany or Nationalist Spain, compared to most of the current West.
Who are the “disfavored groups” now, Colin?
Tell us.
Try to be honest.
My angst arises from viewing the latest JewTube output of that the appalling ‘American’ Irish Catholic* bigot MICK Jones who is now a conduit for Muslim invasion, colluding with its ‘human’ product in the same manner as his cobber, the even more deeply compromised traitor, Kevin Barrett. Take the trouble to look at it.
For the first time, I’ve ‘researched’ (lol!) the net for proof of Catholic collusion with this crime in America and ‘find’ that it’s over-documented. Of course the earlier ‘evidence’ (from the beginning of the ‘Hart-Celler’ (Jew) subversion is by necessity, absent.
* my greatest (off colour) joy is that this invasion has been visited on Ireland. It has caused a long overdue fraternal unity of the decent patriotic Irish people of the South and those of the Protestant North (who, after ‘independence, were they living in the South, were subjected to a ‘cold pogrom’ ). This is the hope of Ireland which might yet show the light on the hill to all of the West and be accompanied by a well deserved curse on the treacherous (((Global Imperialist))) supporting scum of Sinn Fein.
It's always good to hear from an AI bot.Replies: @Blodgie, @Achmed E. Newman, @JM
No one cares what YOU did or did not support …
I didn’t agree with Blodgie based on “No one cares…”
I do agree that the Catholic agencies, just as much as the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society and the Lutherans have been making bank by importing strange foreigners. It’s part greed, part stupidity, but evil in the end.
What on earth are talking about?
That’s disingenuous and evasive because you have deliberately framed it wrongly. I refuse to explain why because you either know and you’re dishonest, or you’re beyond understanding, Dave. Try to ANSWER IT AS IT WAS presented in FULL context.
And what are "materialist presentations"? Is that like a proof of materialism vs. idealism?
After that, look at the sane materialist presentations of e.g. Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth, probably still on YouTube.
You’re a total bore and nutcase.
The Jewish Particle Physicist supervisor who failed or derailed you made the right call.
I read your shit on ‘immigration’ in the Stanford paper and it figures.
You’re a subversive little ‘liberal’ Jew, equally, maybe, more, dangerous than a right wing Zionist because you’re more devious.
You went to the trouble to dig up what I wrote on immigration almost fifty years ago?
I read your shit on ‘immigration’ in the Stanford paper and it figures.
Well, thanks for the compliment!
You’re a subversive little ‘liberal’ Jew, equally, maybe, more, dangerous than a right wing Zionist because you’re more devious.
TUR is like a minefield. muh muh is a Third Worlder with very limited preoccupations. Ignore the retard.
What you say is the truth.
For so much social garbage who post here, the only issue with Jews is “Israel”, including the latest obscenities of the Zionist state.
For all the rest of the Jew Agendas, including the destruction of Western nations, they are in totally unity with them.
When social shit as your goodself declares his ethnicity, I’ll read what you have to say. Until then I’ll assume, as others here have done, that you’re a Dravidian interloper with no legitimate place on this site.
And Caritas and its ‘Catholic’ ‘CEO’s’ and entourage made and continue to make a mint out of state funds in Italy and continues to do so and the same for its counterpart in Australia, the USA and the rest of the European based nations. Just ask any Italian as I have in a number of situations in Italy.
“Pierre & etc.” is a mendacious Vatican agent. Rather like that vile Open Borders creature “Mick Jones” who spews out hatred of those of Protestant heritage, those who made America and the nations of the Anglosphere, lands in which they were beneficiaries but minor actors.
It's always good to hear from an AI bot.Replies: @Blodgie, @Achmed E. Newman, @JM
No one cares what YOU did or did not support …
It’s always good to hear from an AI bot.
Is that the best you can do? I mean cut short the intended meaning?
What are you hiding?
You answered your own question by calling me a mendacious Vatican agent, didn't you? Since you plainly disbelieve that the straightforward reply I gave you earlier is truthful, whether in whole or in part, I fail to see how my saying anything further might pry open your closed mind.
What are you hiding?
Jew power comes from the halls of power in the West.
Their material power does, which is why I suggested enforcing laws already on the books in order to compel their submission.
But the orientation of that material power is religious, the nexus of it centered in that land Jews hold to be their divine inheritance.
Understand that the restoration of Solomon’s temple is a key objective of freemasonry, an institution that has remained essential to the Zionist endeavor since long before the first wave of Jewish immigrants to Palestine in the late 1800s.
It would seem a fairly simple matter to enforce American law in order to affect better conduct from Israel.
Yet we don’t do it. That’s because there’s a force transcending mere material power which prevents it.
The good news is that younger generations aren’t as interested in the religious reasons for Israel’s occupation of Palestine. It may take some time, but it’s clear to me the squatter state isn’t long for this world.
So fucking what if Israel disappears. That does absolutely zero to solve the jew problem.
In fact, it would go a long way toward doing so.
So fucking what if Israel disappears. That does absolutely zero to solve the jew problem.
There is a striking parallel between the council’s removal of obstacles to mixed marriages and the 1965 Hart–Celler Act’s removal of obstacles to non-European, non-Christian, non-White immigration.
Are you meaning to imply that the social-psychological-(moral?) leap required for the former was of a similar nature to that required for the latter?
What of Latin American Catholic migration? Didn’t the Church have support for that preached from the pulpit at least from the 50’s on? That was my understanding, though I may be wrong. In my immediate experience, there’s a large number of (almost all middle class) Catholics who are strident Open Borderists, while not so strident are those Catholics in working class employment.
And this generalisation involving class applies to those of Protestant background as well.
Another generalisation I am inclined to make is that, social class aside, those from ‘religious’ schools are more pro-immigration than those from the government sector.
Some of the most strident ‘immigrationists’ (and Feminists) are those from the very top of the private school system, particularly female. And of course all of these ‘generalizations’ are changing as the mostly negative aspects of Third World invasion starts impacting on the whole of society.
A bit of a mish-mash but the whole damned thing is so.
You mean people who are self-identified Democrats? Or business owners who hire illegals? Trump won Catholics in 2016, 2020, and 2024. There are those who claimed he lost them in 2020, but later exit polls said he won them. (since Trump actually won in 2020, it's not surprising)It's important to remember that "Evangelicals" are self-identifying with church-going much more than a self-identified Catholic is. Self-identified Catholics are those who were baptized Catholic and retain that identification - an identification they're typically BORN with. Whereas Evangelicals are typically distinct from mainline Protestants (perhaps some Lutherans identify as Evangelicals?). The point is "evangelical" is an identity that is mostly CHOSEN.Exit polling data on Tuesday shows Harris losing Catholic voters by 18 percentage points. https://www.newsweek.com/how-did-trump-win-dont-overlook-catholic-vote-opinion-1982114Trump winning the Catholic vote was crucial, but I expect he will govern as though they don't exist. I suspect American Renaissance commentators will also go on about Catholics as though Catholics had nothing to do with Trump winning, as though they don't matter, are irrelevant, etc. The important thing is NOT TO OFFEND JEWS. Remember that.Replies: @Pierre de Craon
In my immediate experience, there’s a large number of (almost all middle class) Catholics who are strident Open Borderists
What I meant was what I wrote: at the very same point in history, Vatican II and the US government—a sacred institution and a secular one—falsely and counterintuitively stated, in effect, that promoting division within their walls was both needful and desirable.
Are you meaning to imply that the social-psychological-(moral?) leap required for the former was of a similar nature to that required for the latter?
No.Moreover, middle-class American Catholics—I myself was born one more than eighty years ago and I remain one today*—never actively supported mass immigration. Many if not most who accepted the rationale advanced by the (((forces))) behind Hart–Celler did so solely because they had been solemnly assured by Teddy Kennedy, LBJ, and every other leading Gentile light in the Democratic Party (and many in the Republican Party as well), not to mention the entirety of the media, that the alteration in legal immigration patterns would never change the ethnic and racial balance of the United States to a significant degree.When these same people came to realize that they had been flat-out lied to by literally everyone, it was too late: the powers-that-be had erected structures that punished public opposition to societal destruction via immigration with obloquy and stigmatization—specifically, the accusation of racism, an accusation freighted with punitive consequences.
What of Latin American Catholic migration? Didn’t the Church have support for that preached from the pulpit at least from the 50’s on?
Because MK brought it up.JM also wrote:
Then why bother to mention his lack of a ‘solid background’ in Physics?
Mossad is not staffed by supermen.And most of the various conspiracy theories, such as the idea of controlled demolition, require incredibly more skill and planning than what actually did happen -- the hijackings and suicide collisions by the jihadists.It is credible to me that a bunch of suicidal jihadists could hijack a few planes -- this sort of thing had happened before. And the observed collapse of the Twin Towers has been shown by Zdeněk Bažant and others to be consistent with gravity-driven collapse.A lot if the Truther scenarios are not physically possible -- the planes as holograms, the magic nuke theory, etc.Controlled demolition of course is physically possible, but the evidence supposedly offered in favor of that theory -- the supposed thermite, which was not actually found, the claim that the collapse is inconsistent with Newton's laws, etc. -- is nonsense. And the effort to install the explosives in the Twin Towers would have been huge, and it still would have been necessary to have the plane collisions to pull off the whole scheme.Occam's razor says the simplest explanation is the one based on the hijackings and plane collisions.Isn't it possible that I am wrong? Sure, science is based on evidence, and new evidence might always show up.But what we actually have in the Truther movement is guys like Rurik claiming that anyone who does not accept his views must be lying, that the AE911Truth petition really says something completely different from what it clearly does say, etc.This is very clearly a textbook example of cult behavior.Is it possible that the craziness of the Truther movement is just a Deep State black op to divert attention from what really happened?Yeah, probably. You know about COINTELPRO? I think the only question is how many Deep State assets are in the Truther movement.What the Truther movement is trying to distract from is the actual fact that the 9/11 attacks were in fact "blowback" against US policy in the Mideast -- the murderous attacks in the 1990s against Iraq, US support for Israeli atrocities against the Palestinians, etc.The bizarre antics of the Truther movement distract from that simple fact.And distracting people from that simple fact very much serves the interest of the US (and Zionist) Deep State.DaveReplies: @JM
Mossad not quite that competent???????And a ragtag of Arabs were????You raise disingenuousness to an art form.
JM wrote to me:
Then why bother to mention his lack of a ‘solid background’ in Physics?
Because MK brought it up.
That’s disingenuous and evasive because you have deliberately framed it wrongly. I refuse to explain why because you either know and you’re dishonest, or you’re beyond understanding, Dave. Try to ANSWER IT AS IT WAS presented in FULL context.
The poster ‘Mulgamumblebrain’ raised all the points needed to answer you on your last points about the unbelievables/paid disinformation/water muddying of all those BS ‘conspiracies’ you mention. Read that. I mean holograms &etc. There was/still is a LOT at stake, so the paid shills went into action in social media.
After that, look at the sane materialist presentations of e.g. Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth, probably still on YouTube.
What on earth are talking about?
That’s disingenuous and evasive because you have deliberately framed it wrongly. I refuse to explain why because you either know and you’re dishonest, or you’re beyond understanding, Dave. Try to ANSWER IT AS IT WAS presented in FULL context.
And what are "materialist presentations"? Is that like a proof of materialism vs. idealism?
After that, look at the sane materialist presentations of e.g. Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth, probably still on YouTube.
Re: American racism, not too sure about blacks walking unmolested in white areas. What about Trayvon and the guy shot in Georgia by the father son vigilante team?
Not only is that VERY Jewy but it’s inaccurate as well. I know this because ALL the Jews I was in contact with at the time swallowed it in full but so did nearly all of the Gentile ‘left’. I was a wake up to the fraud at the time and this came out of my continuous open minded ‘research’. One obvious aspect was that George Zimmerman wasn’t even ‘white’ but a Mestizo and Trayvon was a serial criminal.
But was it all contrived theater?
I cannot verify this ‘analysis’ but it’s worth looking at and the evaluation of those who might have greater insight into the ins and outs of this seminal event that triggered an uprising of Soros sponsored social fraud. It was like the earlier events, all aimed at ‘discrediting’ ‘White America’.
It’s perhaps surprising that it’s still up on YouTube…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joel_Gilbert
https://www.conservapedia.com/Joel_Gilbert
https://www.highway61ent.com/about/
Highway 61 Entertainment
Highway 61 Entertainment produces innovative and unique documentary feature films about controversial subjects and major figures of our time.
About the Director
Joel Gilbert is a documentary film maker based in Los Angeles and President of Highway 61 Entertainment. Gilbert is a graduate of the London School of Economics and George Washington University (MBA) and is a political commentator and foreign policy analyst. He has produced documentary feature films on Barack Obama, Dreams from My Real Father, American politics, There’s No Place Like Utopia, Donald Trump, Trump: The Art of the Insult, and investigative journalism including, Michelle Obama 2024: Her Real Life Story and Plan for Power, and The Trayvon Hoax: Unmasking the Witness Fraud that Divided America. Gilbert has also produced films on Middle East history and politics including Farewell Israel and Atomic Jihad. Other films feature music icons Bob Dylan, Inside Bob Dylan’s Jesus Years and Bob Dylan World Tour 1966 The Home Movies, as well as mockumentaries on Paul McCartney, Paul McCartney Really is Dead and Elvis Presley.
Sorry Jewboy, I never worked as a garbage man. I was a Tradesman for close to fifty years with Master Licenses in three separate trades.
In other words, I’ve done more actual WORK in fifty years than most Jews will do in three lifetimes.
That being said, a garbage man contributes much more to society, as well as being INFINITELY more useful than the vast majority of your sleazy ethnic brethren have ever been or ever will be.
So are you a Pornographer, an Abortionist a Lawyer or a Salesman?
Historically, those are the “trades” Jews excel at.
LOL
Respect.
Nope -- I actually did read it through word for word, as carefully as I normally read non-fiction books. When I say I have read a book, I really do mean word for word, cover to cover, excluding the index, of course. And I generally skim the end-notes to see if the author had any substantive comments or was just citing sources.But, nope, I did not just do a "a quick look-through, searching for the most 'rabid' parts." I read the whole thing.I did not, of course, carefully pore over it as if it were divine gospel, looking for its deep inner meaning: the old boy wrote clearly enough, you know, or at least the translation was fairly clear.Carolyn also wrote:
So I can only conclude that you did not give MK serious attention (time pressures, you know) but more of a quick look-through, searching for the most “rabid” parts which you failed to find. At least you were honest about that.
Nope, I'm not retreating at all -- I'm merely pointing out that the fact that, as far as I can tell, experts on all this do agree with me does suggest that my interpretation is correct and you are wrong.To be sure, I don't really care. I simply made an offhand comment that does indeed accurately convey the impression I got from the book.You seem to suffer from the delusion that, every time someone makes a comment on the Web, then they must prove they are correct to your satisfaction.That's crazy.Now, I know that this delusion is far from unique to you: I have, for example, run into countless religious believers on the Web who, when I casually mention that I am an atheist, insist that I must prove that atheism is true and prove it in a way that they find convincing.Of course, if my goal were to "convert" them to atheism, that might make some sense. But I do not have such a goal. I don't much care that many people believe in one religion or another, although I think they are mistaken. There is no obligation upon me at all to prove, to their satisfaction, that I am right and they are wrong.I just don't care.In those encounters, they are, of course, the ones who wish to change my mind, to "convert" me. And they are not going to succeed at that unless they convince me, to my satisfaction, that they are right.I find it hilariously amusing that they try to reverse this and pretend that I want to "convert" them.When, again, I simply don't care.(By the way, the majority of religious believers do not care that I do not share their views. Live and let live.)And, so, in your case, for some reason that escapes me, it really matters to you that I believe that the little Austrian corporal did not despise the Slavs. Well, fine -- but I am not concerned about changing your mind on this.I just don't care.You can try to change my mind if you wish. But, given that I really just do not care one way or the other, you are foolish if you think I will devote much effort to trying to change your mind on this matter.I have gone on at length on this because I am truly interested in the broader issue of why True Believers on some matter do tend to think that those of us who do not care about that matter are nonetheless obligated to prove the True Believers wrong.I find this intriguing.Carolyn also wrote:
But your excuse falls short of convincing — in fact, is a big Fail because you’re retreating from “I think it would be most accurate to say that Hitler truly despised the Slavs,” to being only “a generally accepted” idea/belief in the propaganda-sphere (meaning not something you gained from reading Hitler’s words in MK).
What does interest me is the broader principles he laid out in the book and on which he did indeed act in fact.For example, he explained in some detail the "Leader Principle," and gave coherent arguments in its favor.For how many generations has your family been in what is now the United States?I can trace my family all the way back to the Mayflower. And from colonial times up until the beginning of the Progressive Era, the dominant attitude among Americans had been that government was simply an ancillary institution, subordinate to society at large, rather like a limited janitorial service that carried out a few limited functions that the populace chose to delegate to the state -- police, courts, national defense.And that is my own view -- no Leader Principle, no leading party shaping society as a whole, indeed no one and no group at all entitled to shape society as a whole. Just all of us individual people and families muddling through as best we can.Have you read Locke's Second Treatise? This is the underlying vision of the Second Treatise, and indeed there are some direct phrases from the Second Treatise in the Declaration. This was certainly Jefferson's vision.That is antithetical to the vision enunciated in Mein Kampf: he very explicitly wanted a dominant party controlled by a supreme Leader that would mold society as a whole.I, like Jefferson, want, at most, a custodial government carrying out a few limited functions. And I am distrustful even of that. I agree with the opening words of Thoreau's famous Essay:
Finally, telling me I’m “free to disagree” is your hypocritical way of saying, “I won’t defend my positions yet at the same time time I won’t change it either.” That’s what we German-National Socialist-Hitler defenders constantly have to deal with: stubborn illogicality. Or simply shutting down the conversation.
That, I am willing to defend and debate.But Hitler's attitude towards the Slavs?Sorry -- I don't much care.Dave Miller in SacramentoReplies: @Carolyn Yeager
I heartily accept the motto, "That government is best which governs least"; and I should like to see it acted up to more rapidly and systematically. Carried out, it finally amounts to this, which also I believe- "That government is best which governs not at all"; and when men are prepared for it, that will be the kind of government which they will have. Government is at best but an expedient; but most governments are usually, and all governments are sometimes, inexpedient.
I see you doing your best to offer a number of alternative topics that interest YOU to distract attention from what you originally said was one of your main takeaways from reading Mein Kampf, ie. that Adolf Hitler said or clearly indicated that he “despised” the Slavs. Okay? You can’t wise-guy your way out of it. Instead of owning up to that, you try to make me responsible for your lies by accusing me of “trying to convert you to my way of thinking” and/or of being a “True Believer” on the subject and then writing a lot of words defining a True Believer. Well, I learned about that True Believer book when I was a teenager, and I am Not That.
You said, back in comment 300:
I simply do not share [Hitler’s] goals, principles, or values.
I certainly never asked you to, even though you’re trying to paint me as doing so, with very many words. You are not important to me in the least, nor do I think you are so influential that it would matter. But I don’t easily give up when someone tries to double-talk me like you are doing.
You repeated several times that you “don’t really care” about any of it and that’s why you don’t want to speak further about it. I say, if you don’t care, why did you write the comment to begin with? This no doubt falls under your heading of Carolyn insisting “all Web commenters must prove they are correct to MY satisfaction.” But my insistence that you answer yes or no to the claims you made earlier regarding Hitler’s supposed words reviling Slavs, has nothing in common with that charge. As I’ve told other people also, you’re confusing apples for oranges.
Another example is that your views on the N-S Leader Principle is not at issue; is therefore beside the point, yet you wrote another couple hundred words comparing it negatively to American democracy. The sole dispute between us is: Did Hitler show he unquestionably “despised” Slavs in the pages of Mein Kampf and give a couple of examples of it. This simple request you cannot fulfill, so you want to change the rules mid-game — making you a dishonest player. Not a trustworthy opponent. And I have nothing to do with that.
Well, above you described yourself as one among the "German-National Socialist-Hitler defenders." That is pretty weird: I think that counts as being a "True Believer."
Instead of owning up to that, you try to make me responsible for your lies by accusing me of “trying to convert you to my way of thinking” and/or of being a “True Believer” on the subject and then writing a lot of words defining a True Believer. Well, I learned about that True Believer book when I was a teenager, and I am Not That.
Yep, that's what I said and that's what I think.
I see you doing your best to offer a number of alternative topics that interest YOU to distract attention from what you originally said was one of your main takeaways from reading Mein Kampf, ie. that Adolf Hitler said or clearly indicated that he “despised” the Slavs. Okay? You can’t wise-guy your way out of it.
Do you understand the idea of a "casual comment"?
You repeated several times that you “don’t really care” about any of it and that’s why you don’t want to speak further about it. I say, if you don’t care, why did you write the comment to begin with?
Ah, maybe now you are catching on!
The sole dispute between us is: Did Hitler show he unquestionably “despised” Slavs in the pages of Mein Kampf and give a couple of examples of it. This simple request you cannot fulfill, so you want to change the rules mid-game — making you a dishonest player. Not a trustworthy opponent. And I have nothing to do with that.
Foot tappin’ time folks…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vb3IMTJjzfo&t=37s
Notice how the All-American audience quickly gets into the swing of it.
So yes! The proposition advanced in this essay has a real chance of success.
no, it's not the standard.
Signing myself as “Dave Miller in Sacramento (Ph.D., physics, Stanford) ” is just the standard way of indicating that my Ph.D. is from Stanford:
which means that your signature,
Here’s a simple format to include your PhD and university:
Your Name, PhD
Your Position/Title
Department or Faculty
University Name
Thanks, Rurik.
But not just that but a fairly thorough search indicates that the professional career of the highly awarded David H. Miller ended with the Ph.D. in Particle Physics.
Did the real holder of this Stanford higher degree die shortly after the award of the Ph.D. or is there some other explanation for this vanishing?
Just askin’…
Obviously, you do not know how to do "a fairly thorough search."
But not just that but a fairly thorough search indicates that the professional career of the highly awarded David H. Miller ended with the Ph.D. in Particle Physics.
Did the real holder of this Stanford higher degree die shortly after the award of the Ph.D. or is there some other explanation for this vanishing?
once it becomes apparent that a person tells shameless lies, it's perfectly normal to question every thing they say.Sanford thinks he's being clever by mixing up lies with truth, to obscure his agenda-driven apologia for evil. Anyone who claims to have looked into 9/11, but then says it was the 'terrorists' who crashed a plane into the Pentagon and that field in PA, and has no interest in Building Seven..is a lying sack of shit.Period.Full stop.
Did the real holder of this Stanford higher degree die shortly after the award of the Ph.D.
I referred very specifically to certain particular theories that disagree with basic principles of physics:[MK] Mr Unz has a knowledge of more than just basic physics and he has stated unequivocally that 9/11 was an Israeli false flag.
[Dave] I have not seen one single person with a legitimate knowledge of basic physics who takes any of those theories seriously
I don't think Ron Unz has advocated any of those specific theories, but, if so, he is wrong.
Most of the Truther theories — the planes-as-hologram theory, the magic nukes theory, the claim that the collapse was inconsistent with Newton’s laws — are simply nonsense from the viewpoint of basic physics.
By the way, according to Wikipedia, Ron has a bachelor’s in physics from Harvard, but chose to drop out of the Ph.D. program at Stanford (which does seem to have been a smart career decision!).
Perhaps you are not aware that a bachelor’s in physics is like a bachelor’s in pre-med: the latter means you are ready to start learning medicine in medical school, but it does not mean you know much yet.
Similarly, a bachelor’s in physics means that you are ready to start really learning physics in grad school; it does not mean you know much physics yet. The same is true in math, though not in engineering — someone with a bachelor’s in engineering really is ready to go out and do real-world work in engineering (I could list many individuals I have known of whom this is true, including my own daughter). I think that is rather unfortunate: I don’t think math and physics undergrad degrees should be structured simply to prep students to actually start learning in grad school. But that is, unfortunately, the case.
So, you should not assume that Ron has a really solid background in physics.
What aspects of the fall of the WTC buildings on 9-11 require a knowledge of Physics beyond that attained by Ron Unz? I would say that your very high achievement in your PhD research on Particle Physics would be of no additional use at all.
In any case, Ron’s views seem to center on issues that do not really involve physics at all.
Then why bother to mention his lack of a ‘solid background’ in Physics?
But one thing is certain: that Ron Unz wouldn’t countenance any ‘conspiracy theory’ if the Physics implicit in that theory didn’t add up according to his knowledge of the subject (Newtonian Mechanics and more).
Tucker has made a compelling case that the US Deep State had been tracking the 9/11 hijackers for some time but, for some reason, failed to stop the hijackings, perhaps because the Deep State hoped to recruit or manipulate the hijackers.
And the US Deep state is largely controlled by Neo-Con Jews. Clearly both acting in collaboration would be, were, required for the 9-11 exercise. The circumstantial evidence for Israeli involvement is strong as is the motive and subsequent ME invasions.
How deep does this go? As you say, Ron may think this is an Israeli false flag.
I’m not yet prepared to go that far, for various reasons — mainly,
I am not sure that Mossad is quite that competent.
But given what the Israelis have provably done — the pager exploit in Lebanon, the genocide in Gaza, the multiple assassinations in Iran — I wouldn’t put it past them.
Mossad not quite that competent???????
And a ragtag of Arabs were????
You raise disingenuousness to an art form.
Because MK brought it up.JM also wrote:
Then why bother to mention his lack of a ‘solid background’ in Physics?
Mossad is not staffed by supermen.And most of the various conspiracy theories, such as the idea of controlled demolition, require incredibly more skill and planning than what actually did happen -- the hijackings and suicide collisions by the jihadists.It is credible to me that a bunch of suicidal jihadists could hijack a few planes -- this sort of thing had happened before. And the observed collapse of the Twin Towers has been shown by Zdeněk Bažant and others to be consistent with gravity-driven collapse.A lot if the Truther scenarios are not physically possible -- the planes as holograms, the magic nuke theory, etc.Controlled demolition of course is physically possible, but the evidence supposedly offered in favor of that theory -- the supposed thermite, which was not actually found, the claim that the collapse is inconsistent with Newton's laws, etc. -- is nonsense. And the effort to install the explosives in the Twin Towers would have been huge, and it still would have been necessary to have the plane collisions to pull off the whole scheme.Occam's razor says the simplest explanation is the one based on the hijackings and plane collisions.Isn't it possible that I am wrong? Sure, science is based on evidence, and new evidence might always show up.But what we actually have in the Truther movement is guys like Rurik claiming that anyone who does not accept his views must be lying, that the AE911Truth petition really says something completely different from what it clearly does say, etc.This is very clearly a textbook example of cult behavior.Is it possible that the craziness of the Truther movement is just a Deep State black op to divert attention from what really happened?Yeah, probably. You know about COINTELPRO? I think the only question is how many Deep State assets are in the Truther movement.What the Truther movement is trying to distract from is the actual fact that the 9/11 attacks were in fact "blowback" against US policy in the Mideast -- the murderous attacks in the 1990s against Iraq, US support for Israeli atrocities against the Palestinians, etc.The bizarre antics of the Truther movement distract from that simple fact.And distracting people from that simple fact very much serves the interest of the US (and Zionist) Deep State.DaveReplies: @JM
Mossad not quite that competent???????And a ragtag of Arabs were????You raise disingenuousness to an art form.
I referred very specifically to certain particular theories that disagree with basic principles of physics:[MK] Mr Unz has a knowledge of more than just basic physics and he has stated unequivocally that 9/11 was an Israeli false flag.
[Dave] I have not seen one single person with a legitimate knowledge of basic physics who takes any of those theories seriously
I don't think Ron Unz has advocated any of those specific theories, but, if so, he is wrong.
Most of the Truther theories — the planes-as-hologram theory, the magic nukes theory, the claim that the collapse was inconsistent with Newton’s laws — are simply nonsense from the viewpoint of basic physics.
Dave, the LUNATIC explanations for 9/11 are plainly diversions intended to paint all alternative theories as mad. The pretty obvious truth, ie planned demolitions of WTC 1, 2 and 7, a missile hitting the Pentagon, and something similar in Pennsylvania, are far more credible than the ‘al-Qaeda did it’ garbage. But the mark of loyalty to the system is the credulity with which one swallows the ‘Official Version’ eg Oswald shot JFK with a magic bullet, Sirhan shot RFK from behind, point-blank, despite never being closer than several feet away and in front, ivermectin is ‘horse-paste’ etc, and the unquestioning enthusiasm in disseminating the received wisdom.
Oh, it goes further than that!
Dave, the LUNATIC explanations for 9/11 are plainly diversions intended to paint all alternative theories as mad.
Never truer words spoken.Replies: @JM
Alas, we live in a time when the best is being slandered, i.e. the great (blessed?) era of ignorance and stupidity.
Lilly Gaddis has just said as much…
Quite moving really.
Alas, we live in a time when the best is being slandered, i.e. the great (blessed?) era of ignorance and stupidity.
Never truer words spoken.
My answer is that Physicist Dave is unable to stand up to/tolerate the challenge presented by European-American women. Chinese women are known for their ability to be very agreeable, not argue, and let the man lead in almost every way. Ah, a peaceful life. Now, in answer to those of the opinion I am exceptionally hard to get along with, my view is that the reason is my unrealistically high expectations/aspirations which I have unfortunately applied to myself also. I don't do that anymore but it's taken a lifetime to figure out. I'm happy today because I have figured it out. :-) I don't see Dave as close to figuring things out yet.Thanks JM.Replies: @PhysicistDave, @JM
What happened to American women of European race?
I have difficulty in assessing the complex question of the mind-body relationship and of Higher Beings and their flow-ons to which you refer.
Just one point: while not seeking to offend anyone for their religious views, except defensively, I reject the view that God has delivered the present catastrophe on European man by way of punishment or didactically. It is more likely, though not proven, that the reason is that He, in the form claimed by Christians, doesn’t exist. The message from this assessment is that it’s entirely up to us to find our way out of it.
I tend towards a materialist evaluation of this world, sure in the knowledge, however, that this utilitarian approach is just scratching the surface, albeit providing powerful explanations for the complex events confronting us.
My motivation in raising the question of Physicist Dave’s miscegenation was to inject a word of favor for our people, an expression too little used. Our people, already severely demographically challenged, will not exist if we marry out, doubly so when we triumphantly herald it on popular sites like TUR.
We must instead acquire some of the obstinate, cohesive, long gaming, attributes of Jews documented by Laurent Guyénot in this passage:
In a recent short video, we see Benjamin Netanyahu being asked what book he is reading now, and answering with a satisfied look that he is reading Jews vs. Rome by Barry Strauss. Asked why he picked it up, he says: “Well, we lost that one, I think we have to win the next one.”
This video has circulated widely (as it was meant to), because it is telling of the way Israel relates to ancient history. This is not the first time Netanyahu shows that he views the history of modern Israel through the lens of ancient history. He does this for the benefit of Israelis (for example when referring to the Palestinians of Gaza as Amalek in October 2023) as well as Gentiles (for example when comparing Trump to Cyrus for recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital in March 2018). This is not just rhetoric. Zionists like Netanyahu are genuinely obsessed by what they think happened to ancient Israel two or three thousand years ago in their struggles with various empires. This obsession is shared by all Zionists since David Ben-Gurion, who had changed his name Grün to that of a Jewish general fighting the Romans. Dan Kurzman writes in his biography Prophet of Fire: “Ben-Gurion was, in a modern sense, Moses, Joshua, Isaiah.” In his view, the rebirth of Israel in 1948 “paralleled the Exodus from Egypt, the conquest of the land by Joshua, the Maccabean revolt.” Ben-Gurion was not religious at all, yet he was thoroughly biblical.
Thanks a lot for your answer, Carolyn. I listened to your podcast with interest.
Ah, but you see, you are not one of my people.
My motivation in raising the question of Physicist Dave’s miscegenation was to inject a word of favor for our people, an expression too little used. Our people, already severely demographically challenged, will not exist if we marry out, doubly so when we triumphantly herald it on popular sites like TUR.
Well, speaking as a physicist, I can tell you that materialism happens not to be true: see here for an essay by the physics Nobel laureate Eugene Wigner explaining why.
I tend towards a materialist evaluation of this world...
So you triumphantly throw this at us who read TUR, seeking acquiescence.
So, my daughters too could join the DAR -- rather amusing, since my wife is the daughter of Chinese immigrants!
I also found this quite … surprising … for someone who takes such pride/pleasure in his (direct, I assume) ancestor who arrived in America on the Mayflower. I was equally surprised when he confessed in comment #347 to being an atheist because I wouldn’t have thought so. He doesn’t want to use that term, as he always wants to present himself as a unique individual, but he fits the description of atheist in all regards. I would say to him that “atheism” is defined as a belief in nothing, rather than something. It is a negative. And I’ll take the opportunity here to counsel him that Atheism is a nihilist path, so he should really think it through more carefully. He takes the idea of being a scientist too seriously, as though it’s sufficient in itself, as though it offers some completion for a full human being –body, mind & spirit.
In my current mind/understanding, we are not just body-mind (the true view of science), in fact not even body-mind, but only Spirit in reality. That’s far-out, I know, and very few have an interest in entertaining such thoughts. But it’s honestly held. In my view, our friend Dave Miller is honesty-challenged — but harmless.
Dave also suggests that passages in Mein Kampf only “vaguely” suggest that Hitler was not an atheist. I disagree; the Fuehrer makes this totally clear in several places in MK and also on many occasions throughout his life, to the end. Adolf Hitler was a believer, but not in “religion” or even traditional Christianity, certainly not the churches, but in a Higher Power which he often labelled Providence, but not limited to that. He received protective information from this Higher Power because he was open to receiving, which means he was not controlled by his ego. This was not occultism or demon-worship by any stretch of the imagination. https://carolynyeager.net/saturday-afternoon-roots-myth-national-socialisms-occult-roots
If Dave actually knew anything about the man, he would realize that. But he fancies that the consensus of the academic/media elites know better than Hitler himself! Astounding chutzpah.
What happened to American women of European race?
My answer is that Physicist Dave is unable to stand up to/tolerate the challenge presented by European-American women. Chinese women are known for their ability to be very agreeable, not argue, and let the man lead in almost every way. Ah, a peaceful life.
Now, in answer to those of the opinion I am exceptionally hard to get along with, my view is that the reason is my unrealistically high expectations/aspirations which I have unfortunately applied to myself also. I don’t do that anymore but it’s taken a lifetime to figure out. I’m happy today because I have figured it out. 🙂 I don’t see Dave as close to figuring things out yet.
Thanks JM.
Really? Why is that surprising?
I was equally surprised when [Dave] confessed in comment #347 to being an atheist because I wouldn’t have thought so.
Actually, I kinda like the label "atheist" -- sounds intellectually daring and rebellious (yes, I know it isn't really), but I have noticed that people tend to misinterpret it as meaning more than just lacking in belief in gods.
[Dave] doesn’t want to use that term, as he always wants to present himself as a unique individual, but he fits the description of atheist in all regards. I would say to him that “atheism” is defined as a belief in nothing, rather than something. It is a negative. And I’ll take the opportunity here to counsel him that Atheism is a nihilist path, so he should really think it through more carefully.
You, my friend, have never met my wife! She has many virtues, but no one has ever accused her of being willing to "let the man lead in almost every way"!
My answer is that Physicist Dave is unable to stand up to/tolerate the challenge presented by European-American women. Chinese women are known for their ability to be very agreeable, not argue, and let the man lead in almost every way. Ah, a peaceful life.
Thanks a lot for your answer, Carolyn. I listened to your podcast with interest.Replies: @PhysicistDave
In a recent short video, we see Benjamin Netanyahu being asked what book he is reading now, and answering with a satisfied look that he is reading Jews vs. Rome by Barry Strauss. Asked why he picked it up, he says: “Well, we lost that one, I think we have to win the next one.”
This video has circulated widely (as it was meant to), because it is telling of the way Israel relates to ancient history. This is not the first time Netanyahu shows that he views the history of modern Israel through the lens of ancient history. He does this for the benefit of Israelis (for example when referring to the Palestinians of Gaza as Amalek in October 2023) as well as Gentiles (for example when comparing Trump to Cyrus for recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital in March 2018). This is not just rhetoric. Zionists like Netanyahu are genuinely obsessed by what they think happened to ancient Israel two or three thousand years ago in their struggles with various empires. This obsession is shared by all Zionists since David Ben-Gurion, who had changed his name Grün to that of a Jewish general fighting the Romans. Dan Kurzman writes in his biography Prophet of Fire: “Ben-Gurion was, in a modern sense, Moses, Joshua, Isaiah.” In his view, the rebirth of Israel in 1948 “paralleled the Exodus from Egypt, the conquest of the land by Joshua, the Maccabean revolt.” Ben-Gurion was not religious at all, yet he was thoroughly biblical.
Matt Walsh’s insightful analysis of the banal anti-White propaganda in the new Ken Burns ‘documentary’…
A little bit ‘arsh and wideswept, Sarita, though I agree that those who are actually knowingly complicit with subversive Jews ought to suffer to the full.
Well, I do not believe in any specific religion and I doubt that any sort of god exists: I'm willing to be labeled an atheist, but I've found that if I describe myself that way, people insist that I somehow "prove" atheism. Nothing to prove -- I do not have a positive belief that can be called "atheism," but merely an absence of belief.
One would think you are an atheist; are you? I doubt it, but atheists like to think that they are Realists, so anything outside of their range of consideration is aberrant, ie. weird. You probably ARE one who claims Hitler was an atheist...
Well... I think my ancestry going back to the Pilgrims is kinda interesting, and I am also descended from one of the soldiers in General Washington's army as well as John Hancock's sister. So, my daughters too could join the DAR -- rather amusing, since my wife is the daughter of Chinese immigrants!
In fact, you did hope to distract from the MK questions by focusing on your beloved Mayflower origin.
....
As to your pride in your own heritage, you share it with my first mother-in-law who put a lot of store in being a DAR member — Daughters of the American Revolution. She told me (and later my parents when she met them) that my children with her son would be fully eligible for these honors.
Well, there are billions who have the opposite view, so your view is certainly unusual, even if you don't like the word "weird"!
Calling that [view of Hitler] “pretty weird” just reveals, in sharp clarity, your very narrow, limited range of what is acceptable in human thought/values. There are millions of us, world-wide.
So, my daughters too could join the DAR — rather amusing, since my wife is the daughter of Chinese immigrants!
So you triumphantly throw this at us who read TUR, seeking acquiescence.
To which I reply: another loser who besmirches his heritage. What happened to American women of European race?
My answer is that Physicist Dave is unable to stand up to/tolerate the challenge presented by European-American women. Chinese women are known for their ability to be very agreeable, not argue, and let the man lead in almost every way. Ah, a peaceful life. Now, in answer to those of the opinion I am exceptionally hard to get along with, my view is that the reason is my unrealistically high expectations/aspirations which I have unfortunately applied to myself also. I don't do that anymore but it's taken a lifetime to figure out. I'm happy today because I have figured it out. :-) I don't see Dave as close to figuring things out yet.Thanks JM.Replies: @PhysicistDave, @JM
What happened to American women of European race?
I'm seeking your acquiescence?[The wild and crazy guy] So you triumphantly throw this at us who read TUR, seeking acquiescence.
[Dave] So, my daughters too could join the DAR — rather amusing, since my wife is the daughter of Chinese immigrants!
To which I reply: another loser who besmirches his heritage. What happened to American women of European race?
Fact-Checking the Remarkable Revelations of Three Dozen Unknown Books
My God, what a courageous sweep of the most World’s most controversial history and what a credit is Ron Unz!
And the outcomes of those Open AI investigations! A Jewish mother couldn’t have delivered better findings!
Carlton Meyer’s YT videos are entertaining and welcome but I find many points on which I disagree on fundamentals, including the one you cite.
The President is setting up a World Government, captured by Wall Street which was dominated by and increasingly hyper-dominated by Jewish Finance Capital but this same ‘Franklin Roosevelt was not an evil president’????
To use the popular American vernacular…WTF!
This is surely not an aberration.
Man’s ‘good’ but he ain’t perfect.
It seems to be the case that in order to experience a zephyr of clean air from the Tribe, one must tolerate a tornado of the foulest stench…like with the political output of this nestling:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hx2y-j1x-Ug
Look at this video in association with his ‘political positions’ listed in this Wikipedia entry:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antony_Loewenstein
I prefer the murderous ‘orthodox’ Zionists to this genre of subversive ‘leftist’ creatures…and that goes for every last one of them, not least Finkelstein, Greenwald and Blumenthal. The ‘trade’ is totally unacceptable.
Based on an earlier experience I am certain that Meyer would strongly disagree.
If women are replaced by artificial wombs, the obvious question arises: what happens to Hide The Sausage?
Well, now is the time to invest heavily in lube, because it’s going to be in high demand in Hulk’s Brave New Woman-Free World. And sex dolls. Invest in sex dolls. And porn. These investments will undoubtedly help The Usual Suspects, which should indicate Hulk’s real allegiance.
To prevent rebellion in the future the elites of the Slavs needed to be exterminated.
yea, that’s what they say. But do you know what I do? I look at the world today, and extrapolate from what I see, as how things might have been.
What I know is..
the Germans were betrayed at the Armistice, because they were told they would get self-determination. Instead, once they disarmed, they were starved, (literally) into signing the German people into perpetual slavery at Versailles, ruled over by depraved Jews, who turned Berlin into a giant brothel with starving German children as amusements for the world’s pedophiles.
Then what I know is, the ((Bolsheviks)) starved to death, and otherwise butchered untold millions of the best of Russia and Ukraine and elsewhere, and enslaved the rest.
So then there’s the Nazis, and WWII. So many lies have been told about that time, that I’ll pass over it, and go to modern times, where, what I know is…
That Jewish supremacists want, (demand) that all white nations commit ethnic suicide. They’re fanatical about it, and obviously hate our guts with a netherworld, Talmudic malevolence.
This I know, because I see evidence of it every day.
I also know Jews did 9/11, in order to plunge the world into eternal wars for Israel.
I also know, that Jews orchestrated the Ukraine war, for nefarious purposes.
I also see that Jews are fanatical about crushing proud, white Christian Russia, as they are about destroying all white lands, that are stubbornly refusing to commit suicide, like Hungary and Poland.
I know all this, because I see it everyday. Jews use treachery, terror and guile, to get millions of people murdered, and whole nations destroyed, like Libya and others, and then as always, lie about it and blame the victim.
These are things I see in my own life, with my own eyes.
I don’t see Germany doing anything like that, either killing people or lying about it. But I do see Jews doing that, committing horrific genocide, and lying about it, while getting their ZOG vassal states to commit atrocity after atrocity, and all of it on the Jew’s behalf.
So if this is what I see today, what are the chances that the Jews were innocent bystanders, minding their own business, back before, during and after WWII?
I think everything I’ve been told about that era, was Jewish lies, exactly like everything I hear from the msm about all these other conflicts and wars and atrocities and horrors, which are orchestrated and perpetrated by Jews and their lackeys, but they always lie about it, and always blame the victim.
In a generation, after the last Palestinian has been genocided, all the movies they make and news-reports and text books, will all say it was all the Palestinians fault, for being hateful terrorists.
I’m just not buying, either the part of the Palestinians all being terrorists, or the German Nazis being crazed racialist murderers, hell-bent on genociding and enslaving the Poles, (or anyone else). I’m sure they killed a lot of Polish Bolsheviks, and I’m glad they did.
But it’s a free country, you can believe what you want to.
if you were to ask all the white women of the world, (or just American white women, either way),Do you want white nationalism to prevail?I suspect that less that 20% of white women would respond in the affirmative. And probably less than 5%, or even 2%. And speaking of 'affirmative', if you asked all the white women of America, (for instance, but it would work for Europe as well), Should society continue to discriminate against white men, and offer all available jobs and promotions and university slots, to white women, and minorities, in front of white men?It has already been demonstrated that the majority of white women support Affirmative Action, even as it fucks over their husbands and sons and brothers and fathers and uncles and so forth, but they support it because it gives an unfair advantage, to them; white women, among others.These are the issues that are rending the relationship between the sexes asunder in the Western world, to the glee of the Jew. But the Jew would get nowhere were it not for the eager complicity of white women, in voting for people like AOC, and open borders and freebies for all people all over the world, because women are naturally more nurturing, especially with other people's resources.
The question is this: is White nationalism more or less likely to succeed,
“I don’t care” was / is the appropriate response!
The Genocidal Mark Levin as Exemplar of Traditional Jewish Hatred Toward Non-Jews
The hatred of the Jew Money Power for Christian America as refracted through Trump’s anti-Maga line…
Marjorie Taylor-Greene’s Full “resignation” speech and commentary by Lilly Gaddis.
(((They))) want women in leading positions…then let’s have:
MTG for President and Lilly Gaddis for VP!
You don't know what took place between Hitler and Geli; no one does. It's all speculation on your part. But you blithely make un-sourced comments here all the time playing as if you're 'in the know'. You've logged over 26,000 [!!!!] comments in 10 years. That has to be a record. Do you do anything else? That might be a reason your wife is not so malleable to your wishes, you think? But what I'm really here to say is that you've written two comments replying to Incitatus' comment to me, not even to you. Yet my latest reply to you in which I responded in full to an issue of disagreement between us, got NO ANSWER from you. I thus have no trouble adding to your list of "nicknames" (such as Noodle--as in limp noodle) the appellation "coward," as in "cowardly Colin" who doesn't show up "to own up" when he finds himself fresh out of glib retorts. But it's just dawned on me that most everything you say is only speculation anyway -- because you have no skin in the game and are just sitting on the sidelines throwing out random ideas (as they come to you) to those that do. You're an un-serious person for all your 26000 comments. That makes you boring. "Colin is a boring boy, boring boy, boring boy." Sung to the tune of ...Replies: @Colin Wright, @JM
[Hitler's] attempts to dominate Geli Raubal didn’t play out at all well.
This is the kind of source the Churchill lover Mr Wright gets his in-depth material for posting:
More to come in his next installment casting Hitler as a Jew.
I feel like an industrialist being told he's soft on Communism. 'The Churchill lover Mr Wright...'You people are a bunch of bigoted, mentally disturbed, willfully ignorant idiots. If you weren't so rude yourselves, I would hesitate to break the news to you, but as it is...Stick it up your ass. Flame war? We can go there. I'm Genghis Khan when it comes to flame wars. Your call.Replies: @Avery
'....the Churchill lover Mr Wright gets his in-depth material for posting...'
Their unity, other than being Jews, is that they are/were partisans of the Zionist state; in the case of Chomsky, using a leftist mask and in the case of Epstein, using assorted covers including deep associations with gentile and Jewish elites.
The breed of Chomsky is very widespread in the Jewish component of left and right variants of the organised left. On a day to day basis, the relationship of Jews to this left is complex ranging from mainly Zionist gatekeeper with very little socialist commitment, to the opposite of this but scratch any Jew on the left and no matter what the verbal acrobatics, you’ll find a staunch defender of the Tribe.
, Chomsky did more in one nano-second to alert people to the US Empire’s crimes and depredations,
what has Chomsky said about the most monstrous crime of the ZUS empire of this century; 9/11 and the subsequent wars for Israel, that has murdered, maimed, tortured and displaced untold millions?
Does he say it was obviously an inside job, perpetrated by Israel and elements within the Bush administration?
Or does he lie about it, to protect his genocidal tribe?
I like the complexity, balance and realism of Mearscheimer’s analysis.
Great powers have their limits, both ways (meaning moral issues are secondary to vital interests). If there is a concurrence of Zionist threats to Russia’s vital interests, it will act and for small fry like the Zionist state, conventional weaponry would suffice. Meanwhile Russia’s superior nuclear capability over the US as well as a perception that the US’s vital interests are not involved, might well leave them out of it.
Then that’s the end of the Zio project in the Middle East.
When it comes to great powers like Russia, geopolitical interest plays a far greater role in their deliberations than does the horrors of blood and guts of small powers and associated moral considerations that are far more the concern of commentators and minorities of the public, particularly those residing in the Western nations.
It may well be that Russia didn’t intervene in Syria because:
i) it didn’t want to over-extend itself, given its critical but unfinished Ukraine operation and the constant threats of even greater deepening of Western intervention;
ii) Israel hadn’t pushed far enough into Russia’s major sphere of interest in Syria or Iran.
But since then the posture of Israel hasn’t abated but become more strident, assuming unconditional US backing and the consequent and continued acquiescence of Russia. In this they may well have miscalculated and thus be at risk of pushing it too far:
The Greater Israel Project is all they can think about.
They’d better watch out if they push that too far because this view seems very realistic:
Leadership from the traditional leaders of Europe against the NWO Agendas …
If you invoke the UN as your arbiter of truth, you already lost.