Chutzpah: US Dual-National Zionists Target “Disloyal” US Dual-Nationals
“Warning: Millions of Dual Citizens Targeted in October 2025. The rules for dual citizenship are changing dramatically in October 2025. Millions of Americans with two passports could be facing unprecedented scrutiny on taxes, passports, and national loyalty. This isn’t just for new applicants—current dual citizens [except those from Israel] are also affected.” Genuinely treasonous US dual-national Zionists are now using their absolute control over the US government to target allegedly “disloyal” (i.e., disloyal to ***Israel***) US dual-nationals for selective intimidation, harassment, investigation, penalties, restrictions, and prosecution.||ideology||
We get an abundance of actual images and vignettes, in photos and prose, each recognizable; yet a clear portrait of the man fails to resolve itself in the biography as a whole
I completely agree. I’m reading the book now, about half-way through. I was trying to think what I would say about it if I were to write my own book review, and this was the main point. Buckley just seems to fade into the background at many points, and I have no sense of him, really. Part of it is Tanenhaus’s story-telling style, which is virtually absent. For example, he informs us that Buckley went on the speaker circuit to campuses for ISI, but he never gives us an example. As it happens, Buckley had been to the college I attended the year before I applied, and the students who invited him had a lot to say about his visit. Did Tanenhaus interview anybody about these? What was he doing for 30 years? Not journalism, except for the muck-raking about the Buckley newspaper in SC. That’s the other problem with the bio. Half of it is boomer hand-wringing about racism. Yawn. Tanenhaus’s bio will be forgotten soon. There is perhaps another, better writer still to come out with the definitive bio.
As for Roy Cohn anecdote, it seems quite clear that it was left out because it puts gays in a poor light.
Walter Block was drummed out of the libertarian movement by HHH over his support of Israel in the current Gaza conflict. So, bad example.
“Infinite plasticity”. More typical stupid BS from this side. When people shave or cut their hair, or cut off their feet, they don’t claim to be transforming into a different form of human being. Obviously not analogous to trannyism
Are you sure it isn't: (d) He was just joking and you took him seriously?
Following Carlson’s claims during the election that he was physically mauled by demons in his sleep, leaving actual bloody claw marks, which he has not showed pictorial evidence of, I have to conclude that (a) he is crazy, (b) he is a cynical liar... (c) he is really an asset of God.
You can find it if you just search for “Tucker Carlson demon attack” on YouTube. It’ll come up top.
It’s in an interview he gave for a documentary called “Christianities”.
Also, I note that the Patrick Ben-David podcast is naming associates of Kirk who are directly refuting your claim that Kirk told his associates he was scared of Israel. Dave Smith is also speaking out against this idea in his recent podcast related to the topic of DMs he received from Kirk. This is why it would be nice for you to name names. Right now, it looks like your solid source is going through a phase change.
By the way, the article you published in your “science” section on the science of trannies is of very poor quality. Not up to the standards of the political commentary on the site.
So, when he reached puberty, he developed natural female breasts, hips, skin texture, facial features, and all the other physical characteristics of a regular genetic woman.
Typical lie.
Hormone treatments can change the trajectory of the development of tissues at puberty, which is why secondary sexual characteristics like skin texture and hair are affected. They cannot change the underlying structure of the body, which is why this person did not development at puberty a vagina, uterus, or ovaries, which are the most important parts, definitionally, functionally, and (as this is secondary to functionality), socially. This person cannot be a sexual mate for a man or be a mother, which is why the author met this person in a gay bar.
Today, she is a very beautiful and very nice woman in her 30s.
No, this person isn’t. This person still looks like a man dressing up as a woman. There are occasional transexuals that can really pass but they are few in the trans world, and this is not one, which is why the author met this person in a gay bar.
The article starts by saying the parents believed the child’s self-reported gender dysphoria was his “real gender”. There’s no reason for us to accept that. Sorry his parents allowed him to express his homosexuality as a very complex form of performative transvestitism.
The rest of the article just recounts the author’s acceptance of the ideologies that have captured the scholarly fields that study trannies. The fact that some sex researcher claims there are lots of genders or some stupid nonsense is not a dunk on people who disagree.
The author says he has 40 years of experience writing about trans issues. Looks like he wasted 40 years of his life. Now he should atop wasting other peoples’ time too by stopping his credulous writing.
Well, you'll just have to take my word for it. It was somebody I regard as extremely solid who knew Kirk very well.
Mr. Unz, you often have anonymous sources that are able to give you key information. Although I don’t mean to slander you with being a liar, your statements would sometimes be more convincing if these key sources could be identified. What does it mean that he “knew” Kirk?
Following Carlson’s claims during the election that he was physically mauled by demons in his sleep, leaving actual bloody claw marks, which he has not showed pictorial evidence of, I have to conclude that (a) he is crazy, (b) he is a cynical liar (which opens the possibility he is an asset of some clandestine group), or (c) he is really an asset of God. All of these suggest Carlson is not going to take precautions. Nevertheless, I think orchestrating a public assassination in which some patsy is set up convincingly must be harder than arranging a house fire or a “burglary” or a “hunting accident” while he’s walking his dog. Similarly, Kirk wouldn’t need to be killed Ukrainian-style with a car bomb. He could be killed Russian-style in an airplane accident or by falling out a window, or American -style in a “hold-up gone wrong” or an unexplained suicide.
Unless all the evidence so far has been fabricated, Tyler Robinson appeared not to want to be a martyr. I doubt he is “taking one for the team” (i.e., being misled into silence by Mossad manipulation).
The other possibility is that he thinks he really did kill Kirk while someone else did it. In that case, proper police work should uncover multiple bullets.
Are you sure it isn't: (d) He was just joking and you took him seriously?
Following Carlson’s claims during the election that he was physically mauled by demons in his sleep, leaving actual bloody claw marks, which he has not showed pictorial evidence of, I have to conclude that (a) he is crazy, (b) he is a cynical liar... (c) he is really an asset of God.
Well, I can't really say about that one way or the other.
Believe me when I tell you:
Israel had nothing to do with this revolting murder.
Hard stop.
You can bet your children, your wife, your house on it.
Mr. Unz, you often have anonymous sources that are able to give you key information. Although I don’t mean to slander you with being a liar, your statements would sometimes be more convincing if these key sources could be identified. What does it mean that he “knew” Kirk?
The question I have about the Israeli theory is why Israel hasn’t killed Tucker Carlson (or John Mearsheimer). Carlson is very much like Kirk in terms of influencing public opinion and much more outspoken about Israel and much easier to kill (in his rural Maine home). For that matter, targetting Kirk in a hotel, home, or airplane would be much easier than this. If they were going to go to the trouble of such an operation, why not do a different one?
Well, you'll just have to take my word for it. It was somebody I regard as extremely solid who knew Kirk very well.
Mr. Unz, you often have anonymous sources that are able to give you key information. Although I don’t mean to slander you with being a liar, your statements would sometimes be more convincing if these key sources could be identified. What does it mean that he “knew” Kirk?
LOL. Well, here is Kirk's voice from the grave, one of the clips from the Blumenthal interview I mentioned, which apparently Kirk made about a month ago.
Although I don’t mean to slander you with being a liar, your statements would sometimes be more convincing if these key sources could be identified.
That would be a case of locking the barn door after the horse has bolted.
The question I have about the Israeli theory is why Israel hasn’t killed Tucker Carlson (or John Mearsheimer). Carlson is very much like Kirk in terms of influencing public opinion and much more outspoken about Israel and much easier to kill (in his rural Maine home).
I answer this in Wyatt Peterson's thread:
For that matter, targetting Kirk in a hotel, home, or airplane would be much easier than this. If they were going to go to the trouble of such an operation, why not do a different one?
Replies: @L.K
The very public act of execution is intended precisely for its effect, which, in this case, is incitement to civil war. Not letting a good crisis go to waste is a purely bipartisan endeavor, and Kirk’s assassination is a boon to our present administration, diverting the electorate’s focus from Trump’s plethora of scandals and Israel’s intensifying malevolence back to a newer, darker chapter of pedestrian conflict now coming to a neighborhood near you. A win-win-win for the TPTB.
Oh, and that pesky little Kirk? What with his presidential ambition and sympathies a bit too sketchy to let take root? The one whose defection might have been the atmospheric disturbance precipitating the perfect storm to threaten Israel’s blue skies in America?
No more. Another win.
For Israel, what’s not to love?
https://www.unz.com/article/did-israel-murder-charlie-kirk/#comment-7305253
Sounds like the Japanese are drinking the kool aid just like the West and will ultimately destroy their country and culture. The creation of a nationalist party is just confirmation things are headed in that direction.
Michael Tracey and Richard Hanania have been having a laugh at the credulous MAGA folks. In fact, they recorded a special “emergency” podcast to guffaw over the birthday letter Trump sent to Epstein…. yeah, that letter that no one has seen and that the WSJ hasn’t wven (if you read between the lines) claimed to have seen let alone verified. Stupid credulous CPT!!!!!
https://substack.com/@simplicius76/p-166525735
Shayrat Redux? Trump’s ‘Invisible’ Fleet Leaves Mirage of ‘Devastation’ in Iran||foreign-policy||
When the SPLC doxxed him a few years ago, they said he was 55 years old, so must have been late 50s or 60s.
Going by the SPLC doxing info, Z-man was turning 58 years old sometime this year.
When the SPLC doxxed him a few years ago, they said he was 55 years old, so must have been late 50s or 60s.
Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
In his first appearance on Counter-Currents Radio on Aug. 15, 2017, The Z Man said that he was 50 at that time, lived in Baltimore, and grew up in the South, all of which match biographical details for the Baltimore-raised Zander.
To the tune of “On the Road Again”!
I wonder if previously overdoing it in the heat was a contributing factor to Z-man's untimely death later this week.Replies: @Chrisnonymous, @David Davenport
Melissa
[...]
Last week, I sent him an email to thank him for all he does and wish him a happy WV Day. He responded on Sunday and I wanted to share his response with you. He refers to the recent retirement of John Derbyshire.“I must confess that I was a bit melancholy when John retired. The reminders that you only have so much time become more poignant as you get older.I may have over done it a bit on the first day of the heatwave. I was only out for about four hours, but I feel like I ran a marathon. My people are not built for this hot weather. That said, it is nice to be outside without the threat of rain. I’m hoping the heat kills the damned gnats. The state bird of West Virginia is the gnat I think.”Z
At least that doesn’t sound suicidal.
He was still posting just a few days ago. Any idea what he died from? He wasn’t that old, so maybe a heart attack?
Replies: @Curle
Suicide is a choice. In Western societies at this point in time, making that choice, regardless of the circumstances, is immoral. In other times and other places, suicide was an honorable option. The Japanese used to treat ritual suicide as an honorable end for a man who faced a disgraceful end. The West used to have the idea of leaving a doomed man alone with a bottle of whiskey and revolver. The former was to gain the required courage to use the latter for the honorable act.
I wonder if previously overdoing it in the heat was a contributing factor to Z-man's untimely death later this week.Replies: @Chrisnonymous, @David Davenport
Melissa
[...]
Last week, I sent him an email to thank him for all he does and wish him a happy WV Day. He responded on Sunday and I wanted to share his response with you. He refers to the recent retirement of John Derbyshire.“I must confess that I was a bit melancholy when John retired. The reminders that you only have so much time become more poignant as you get older.I may have over done it a bit on the first day of the heatwave. I was only out for about four hours, but I feel like I ran a marathon. My people are not built for this hot weather. That said, it is nice to be outside without the threat of rain. I’m hoping the heat kills the damned gnats. The state bird of West Virginia is the gnat I think.”Z
Brought to you by ChatGPT, celebrating the posting of a new iSteve Open Thread….
“I Can Load Again”
Well, my tablet’s old, the screen is cracked,
But I still try to load that blog post back.
When the comments rise, I can’t get through,
The page just hangs, what can I do?
I can load again,
Oh, I can load again!
I can load again,
When the post is fresh and thin!
I can load again,
Oh, I can load again!
When the comments aren’t too many,
I can load again!
Sometimes I wait for the screen to spin,
Hoping for that post to load in.
When it’s got a hundred comments, I know,
It’s time to give up and let it go!
I can load again,
Oh, I can load again!
I can load again,
When there’s only five or ten!
I can load again,
Oh, I can load again!
When the comment count’s light,
I can load again!
Oh, the pages take so long,
But when they’re small, I sing my song!
I just keep tryin’, it’s worth the fight,
When the post is new, it feels so right!
I can load again,
Oh, I can load again!
I can load again,
When it’s under fifty friends!
I can load again,
Oh, I can load again!
When the comments are so few,
I can load again!
I can load again,
Oh, I can load again!
I can load again…
When I finally see it spin!
Yeah, I can load again!
It’s nice that the latest thread will load in my browser now that it doesn’t have 1000+ comments.
There should be regular thread renewals. They should have relevant questions like “when Sailer dies, who will be the next Sailer?”. I mean obviously Sailer should turn into a title, like ” Caesar”. It can even have devolutions like Tsar…. Sailer–>Slur. Slur Achmed II, etc.
You’re so endearingly naive. Obviously, Sailer can communicate directly to Unz without posting. He’s doing it as a form of public denial. “I’m not posting at Unz Review” .
I like to scroll through the posts here just to read the handles. Lots of great names going back to the great days of iSteve blog. Cheers!!
In other AI news, researchers report that LLMs like Grok lie, hallucinate, and tell users what they think users want to hear….
About the election, one commenter points out that the Vatican is in deep financial trouble and the likeliest source of fundraising in the next few decades is the USA. That ‘s from a protestant clergyman.
I am confused why you would be surprised over a mathematician’s Catholic faith. Belief in God is not the same as appreciation of God, which may come from spiritual practices that you eschew. More importantly, if God is, as you suggest, real, then you have to accept that He may be closer to some men than others who may only be able to discern Him as an abstraction.
That is interesting to me, because I thought "The Vatican" was actually one of the wealthiest property owners on Earth. Have you seen their churches? Do you know how devoted their members are?No matter. I believe you, and I am grateful for your reply.This need for the USA on the part of the Vatican, if it exists, is yet another example of what my "Reformat," (Protestant-Hungarian) wife is calling "The Trump Effect." What she means is that suddenly leaders of diverse organizations and nations around the world have awoken and realized that the American People have somehow managed to elect a strong leader that they, those others, will have to deal with.A strong leader. She loves this stuff. That's why she married me. LOL. ( I actually consider myself a failure, and I don't know why she continues to love me.)Perhaps more importantly here, between you and me: My reason for doubting a mathematician's Catholic faith is perhaps summed up by the history concerning Galileo:I have been am amateur astronomer for the past half century. When I was 15 year old, my father gifted me with a 6-inch Newtonian reflector telescope with an equatorial clock drive. That instrument was made by the Cave Optical company in California. My father ordered it for me when he was on one of his many business trips. He actually encouraged me to call on the telephone and speak to Mr. Cave himself and enquire about the progress of my particular, f8 scope. You see, Dad had visited and toured the Cave Optical telescope shop on that trip. He knew I liked astronomy.Okay, so, my point (I guess) is that I know damn well about what happened to Galileo Galilei. The Catholic church has never been concerned about the truth. It has always been concerned about preserving and protecting its beginnings. It's just like all the Jewish, all the Islamish, all the etc. "groups" and "memes" of stupid human monkeys. There is no truth in "religion." A mathematician may very well see God, but if he is any good at all, he will realize that what he sees is not reflected in the pathetic, self-serving, human "religions" that pretend to know Him and enforce themselves with extreme prejudice.Replies: @epebble, @EdwardM
...the Vatican is in deep financial trouble and the likeliest source of fundraising in the next few decades is the USA.
How does anyone know?
the Vatican is in deep financial trouble
What is she going to do with a $700,000 money order when the bank closes her account?
Gold, Bitches!
Many Chinese are dupes of the regime, which supports outward-looking revenge to distract from the fact that it is itself the inheritor, descendant, and beneficiary of the greatest attacks on Chinese people and civilization in history. If Chinese people took da fu chou seriously, they would be rising up against the regime and all the Party members. An example of this kind of dupe is a girl I met from Dalien who told me that the PRC would “take back” Taiwan for the Chinese and get revenge on the “traitors” there. When one reflects that Taiwan is actually currently in the hands of Chinese people and that the nationalists who fled there were more supportive of traditional Chinese culture than the Communists, it becomes clear that this girl’s perspective is simply incoherent, the kind of internal contradictions in her thought stem from being propagandized. It’s only by conflating Chinese people and culture with the regime and its policies that one can arrive at such an absurd idea as that Taiwan is currently not Chinese or that the Taiwanese are traitors to Chinese civilization.
I have traveled throughout Asia, including the PRC, Taiwan, and other locations of Chinese diaspora, and I meet PRC citizens regularly in my current circumstances. The idea that PRC people in modern times are Confucianists is a joke, and so, when one point of Confucianism, such as vengeance, is selected out and justified by its Confucian grounding, you can be sure the motivation is found somewhere else, such as feelings of inadequacy or state propaganda efforts.
From what I’ve seen, he appears to be anti-gay but pro-immigration. My guess is that there was a concern among the cardinals that a pro-gay Pope would cause a schism in the church (because of the third-world bishops), so they’re preventing that while at the same time advancing the leftist agenda of destroying the West with immigration. Dumb-case scenario is that the conclave elected an American someone to a decades-long job in order to oppose Trump/Vance, who will probably be in office only 3-7 more years.
Yeah, that's no typo either. He wasn't just down there for Machu Picchu, the olde turtles, and the llamas. Just WTH has this "American" been up to anyway?Hey, I'm not Catholic. Whatever he turns out like ... not my problem. You guys got it. Not you in particular, of course.Replies: @Achmed E. Newman, @Corvinus, @Pericles
This time around it sounds like the question is not "Is the Pope Catholic?" It might be "Is the Pope a Commie?", but the real question is, "Is the Pope an American?" Is he an American from Chicago or an "American" from Chiclayo?
I must have screwed up the link, and I didn’t check it: “Houston, we habe Papem.”
No problems!
Oh, I agree. I would almost count myself among them, but I don't think my wife would feel the same.
There are quite a few people, I think, who would be willing to take a one-way trip to Mars.
That is the same picture I am painting: That is exactly what Musk is working toward. There is no plan for what comes next. All I can tell you is that it will be a one-way ticket -- generationally. What that means is, Nobody who grows up or develops for any length of time on Mars will ever be able to "come back" and do anything on Earth.Now, perhaps that is okay, in a historical sense, to wit: My ancestors came to this continent on sailing ships over the past 375 years or so. They never had any plans to go back to Europe. However, I periodically go "back to Europe" with my European wife. I can do that because Europe has the same gravity as America.Nobody born and reared on Mars will ever be able to go to Earth, the planet of their ancestors, without enormous difficulty as very heavy people when they get there.Imagine: I weigh around 180 pounds (about 81-82 kilos.) If I were a Martian and I wanted to visit Earth, the planet of my ancestors, or to marry a woman from that planet Earth, I would weigh there on Earth about 473 pounds (214-215 kilos.)I can hardly imagine what it would feel like to weigh 473 pounds, but that would be like the experience of anyone whose ancestors colonized Mars. There is no way back unless you want to spend your time on Earth feeling like an extreme fatty. Martians will be permanent Martians. There will be no figuring out the whole traveling back and forth thing later.**That is, of course, unless there happens some unforeseen discovery or technological/medical development that makes all of this possible. To expect that is like jumping off a cliff and expecting someone to catch you on the way down. Martian colonization is a one-way plan that will literally give birth to a new breed of humans who will never be able to function on Earth.That might be okay. That's just what it will be, and I don't see anybody, not even Musk, addressing this simple fact.Replies: @Chrisnonymous, @YetAnotherAnon
We could start with them and figure out the whole travel back and forth thing later.
Well, my idea was that Mars colonization would be one-way until we got that figured out. I.e., there would be no generations raised on Mars until we got the problems you refer to figured out.
The real issue with gravity, I suspect, will be less the issue of pure strength (we could likely be mitigated through various exercise regimens and stress inducing) than the issue of unknown physiological effects, especially in development. Although there may be rodent experiments on the ISS that I am unaware of, I think we have no idea about gravity’s impact on embryos or early life tissue formation, and how that may impact things like nutrition. For example (just speculating), maybe without Earth gravity, bone formation would require less calcium, and the “excess” calcium in a normal diet would end up in places we don’t want it, doing things we don’t want it to do.
Anyway, just as AI can detect the race of a patient from a chest x-ray in some way we can’t understand, I suspect AI will be able to contribute a lot to solving these kinds of problems even before we experience them. I read a criticism of Musk’s Mars plans that essentially amounted to “his timeline is too fast” and then discovered the AI2027 working group soon after that predicting that our timelines are all too long. Maybe Musk is really just that much smarter than many of his critics. That would explain why his politics got more like ours!!! ; D
There are quite a few people, I think, who would be willing to take a one-way trip to Mars. We could start with them and figure out the whole travel back and forth thing later.
Oh, I agree. I would almost count myself among them, but I don't think my wife would feel the same.
There are quite a few people, I think, who would be willing to take a one-way trip to Mars.
That is the same picture I am painting: That is exactly what Musk is working toward. There is no plan for what comes next. All I can tell you is that it will be a one-way ticket -- generationally. What that means is, Nobody who grows up or develops for any length of time on Mars will ever be able to "come back" and do anything on Earth.Now, perhaps that is okay, in a historical sense, to wit: My ancestors came to this continent on sailing ships over the past 375 years or so. They never had any plans to go back to Europe. However, I periodically go "back to Europe" with my European wife. I can do that because Europe has the same gravity as America.Nobody born and reared on Mars will ever be able to go to Earth, the planet of their ancestors, without enormous difficulty as very heavy people when they get there.Imagine: I weigh around 180 pounds (about 81-82 kilos.) If I were a Martian and I wanted to visit Earth, the planet of my ancestors, or to marry a woman from that planet Earth, I would weigh there on Earth about 473 pounds (214-215 kilos.)I can hardly imagine what it would feel like to weigh 473 pounds, but that would be like the experience of anyone whose ancestors colonized Mars. There is no way back unless you want to spend your time on Earth feeling like an extreme fatty. Martians will be permanent Martians. There will be no figuring out the whole traveling back and forth thing later.**That is, of course, unless there happens some unforeseen discovery or technological/medical development that makes all of this possible. To expect that is like jumping off a cliff and expecting someone to catch you on the way down. Martian colonization is a one-way plan that will literally give birth to a new breed of humans who will never be able to function on Earth.That might be okay. That's just what it will be, and I don't see anybody, not even Musk, addressing this simple fact.Replies: @Chrisnonymous, @YetAnotherAnon
We could start with them and figure out the whole travel back and forth thing later.
https://brownstone.org/articles/is-this-the-man-who-created-covid-19-in-faucis-us-lab/
Origin of Sars-CoV-2 in US research
Explaining how the virus jumped to Iran still hasn’t been done… Also, it’s unfortunate this story isn’t getting mainstreamed because it would make COVID a cautionary tale for AI research.||science||
As I pointed out in another thread , Netanyahu tells Israelis to remember Amalek because there are no laws in the Torah he can point to to support the Gaza ethnic cleansing. If there were, we can be sure not only he but all the Torah-observant Orthodox would be relying on it. Instead what we see is that many Torah-observant Jews are anti-Zionist and oppose the war in Gaza. Amalek is not a generalizable principle, and Netanyahu is wrong and dishonest on this point.
There are strands of Jewish interpretation that predict a messianic-genocide-slavery scenario, but these are apocalyptic and their use to guide contemporary policy-making are wrong and cannot be fairly laid on the Torah.
I have always pondered about how Christians (and to some extent Jews) caricatured God as having human features (bearded oldish gentlemen with halo in a cloud somewhere) which is totally different from the Muslims’ view of the God of whom NOTHING is comparable to Him. Why would god have features similar to human? Does god need a mouth? Does god eat. If he has a mouth to eat does he have a stomach? Does he go to the bathroom often like we do? Does he has nostrils to breath? Does he has a navel? Obviously The God CANNOT be similar to human. Our form is functional and God does not function like us. This alone would counter the notion that man was created in the image of god.
There may be a sense in which man was created “in the image of God,” but to get a sense of that sense, you need to leave your body and ego behind. That’s what the mystics from all traditions have been telling us for millennia.
This is dumb. No serious Christian theologian or believer thinks of the Father as a literal embodied man, while the Son is conceived of as definitely an embodied man about whom we can say, yes, he has a stomach and eats. So, the commenter is wrong about Christian belief in multiple ways.
He’s also wrong about Islam because although Allah may be philosophically posited to be unlike man in that religion, actually what we see throughout the Koran is a god that demonstrates man-like psychology and communicates through language. In other words, he condescends to communicate with his creation in a very human way, and this is exactly how Yahweh is conceived by Jews and the Father conceived by Christians.
Kevin Barrett’s idea is also wrong. Islam is not gnostic any more than Christianity and preaches a physical resurrection of the body on judgement day and an embodied paradise. What is in God’s image is not a disembodied unemotional Aristotelian point.
No, you’re not recognizing the divisions between observant and non-observant and among different sects of observant. There aren’t Hasids making porn and distributing it among gentiles as your ideas would suggest.
Take, for example, James Deen the porn actor. He is a Jew who has expressed Jewish supremacy views. He makes porn with gentile girls and distributes it in a gentile country, but he also made lots of porn with actress Joanna Angel, who is Jewish, and distributes that both in the US and in Israel. In other words, he’s not holding a double standard for inside and outside the Jewish community.
When the porn blogger Luke Ford converted to Orthodox Judaism, his rabbi told him he had to stop writing about porn or he couldn’t come to their synagogue. In other words, the rabbi was cracking down on Ford’s promotion of porn in the gentile world of blogging.
Luke Ford writes:
Jews participating in the sex trade are not behaving Jewishly. They’re acting in a manner contrary to everything Jewish – the Torah, Israel, God, synagogue and everything the Jewish tradition considers holy.
But to be a Jew, you simply have to be born of a Jewish mother, just as you automatically become an American if you are born to American parents. A Jew can hate Judaism and Israel, Moses and the Torah, and still be a Jew. His values aren’t Jewish but he’s still a member of the people Israel. To be a Christian, by contrast, one must affirm Christ.
This explains how Jews can live un-Jewish lives.
While few Jews are radical, many radicals (and pornographers) are Jews. Writes non-Jew Ernest van den Haag in his book The Jewish Mystique, “Out of one hundred Jews, five may be radicals, but out of ten radicals, five are likely to be Jewish.”
Virtually all movements to change the world come from the Jews – Christianity, secular humanism, Marxism, Socialism and Communism, feminism, and the labor movement. That’s part of the reason that Jews are hated. The world doesn’t want to be changed.
Rooted in nothing, radical Jews frequently seek to make others equally rootless by tearing down their religious, national, communal and traditional allegiances. Such Jews carry on the traditional Jewish hatred of false gods but without offering anything to replace the scorned allegiances.
Jewish domination of porn, banking, entertainment, media and academia does not lead to discrimination against gentiles – most radical Jews marry Gentiles. Nor does it lead to flattering portraits of Jews, as Jews abound in self-criticism. Rather, the most important result of the domination of non-Jewish Jews in these fields is their war on traditional values. Porn is just one expression of this rebellion against standards, against the disciplined life of obedience to Torah that marks a Jew living Judaism.
Your idea that Jews undermining gentile society are acting out the spirit of the Torah is just wrong.
The key word in your comment is ” cursory “. In fact, there was disagreement among Jews about how to interpret the lending laws. Some thought as you suggest, that it was an ethnic command that allowed them to exploit other people, but some thought it was a command about about community and that “foreigners” were people who lived outside the community. In the diaspora, there was a debate about whether the commandment disallowed, for example, French Jews lending to French gentiles but allowed French Jews lending to German gentiles.
The Torah does advocate for separation between Israelites and non-Israelites, but not for the destruction of all non-Israelites just because of their ethnicity. In fact, the Torah describes Israel as a witness to other nations, the “Noahide” commands are generally considered to be a path to eternal life for non-Jews, and in the 1st century BC, synagogues all over the Roman empire welcomed “God-fearing” gentiles who were interested in learning about Torah and Yahweh.
The reason Netanyahu makes references to the Amalekites instead of referring to laws commanding the destruction of non-Jews living in Palestine is that such laws don’t exist. The situation with the Amalekites was a one-off specific thing with historical contingency, not a general command for all time. So, Netanyahu can’t cite such a law in his statements.
Does the Torah have different standards for different peoples? Yes. Does it just blanket advocate for destroying or undermining all non-Jews? No.
The article is about Yahweh and the Torah, not about the Jews. When Jesus criticized the Jews, His criticism was based on their non-adherence to Torah. When He says their father is Satan and that he was a murderer from the beginning, He is referring back to the beginning of Genesis, the first scroll of Torah. Jesus is not saying Yahweh is part of Satan, but that the Jews are of Satan because they do not follow Yahweh.
The issue of Yahweh’s haram command to genocide people is an ethical challenge to the Torah’s divine inspiration, but (1) it is a challenge to Jews, Christians, and Muslims, all of whom rely on the Torah’s inspiration to legitimize their beliefs and (2) it is separate from the JQ, which is about population, not theology and belief.
Torah observant Jews = letter of the law
Yes but those things are all done by secular/liberal Jews, not Torah-observant ones,
So, killing or exiling people for adultery is the letter of the law but making porn is the spirit of the law? Banning cross-dressing and homosexual sex is the letter of the law but LGBTQ is the spirit of the law? Wearing somber clothes that hide your body is the letter of the law but Hollywood is the spirit of the law? LOL, no.
Yes but those things are all done by secular/liberal Jews, not Torah-observant ones, which fact puts an interesting spin on the Yahweh is evil schtick.
Torah observant Jews = letter of the law
Yes but those things are all done by secular/liberal Jews, not Torah-observant ones,
We have revealed the Torah, wherein is guidance and light. The submissive prophets ruled the Jews according to it, so did the rabbis and the scholars, as they were required to protect God’s Book, and were witnesses to it. So do not fear people, but fear Me. And do not sell My revelations for a cheap price. Those who do not rule according to what God revealed are the unbelievers.
And We wrote for them in it: a life for a life, an eye for an eye, a nose for a nose, an ear for an ear, a tooth for a tooth, and an equal wound for a wound; but whoever forgoes it in charity, it will serve as atonement for him. Those who do not rule according to what God revealed are the evildoers.
In their footsteps, We sent Jesus son of Mary, fulfilling the Torah that preceded him; and We gave him the Gospel, wherein is guidance and light, and confirming the Torah that preceded him, and guidance and counsel for the righteous.
So let the people of the Gospel [which confirms the Torah] rule according to what God revealed in it. Those who do not rule according to what God revealed are the sinners.
LOL.
Author photo below the More fold..
In the Genesis story we are not told Adam and Eve’s skin colour. But from this pair came the diverse nations we see on earth today. It is clear the whole of creation was to be multi-coloured and diverse. For God loves diversity...
At this point a sperm donor who knew Mejier became a Whistleblower. Jonathan Mejier was not a lone wolf, he was part of a global group of mass donors who divide the world into territories with the aim of creating as many white children as possible. This is their method of bleaching the world. Their task is to rid the world of non-white nations by saturating it with white babies...
Mass donors like Jonathan Jacob Mejier are no better than Adolf Hitler. Here is a quote from serial donor Anthony Greenfield “So far, I donated sperm in the Netherlands, Belgium, Thailand, Vietnam, Philippines, Kenya, Uganda. But soon more countries will be colonised by my glorious and mighty white seed.”
These guys (heroes) are risking blindness to solve Africa’s iq problem.
In the Genesis story we are not told Adam and Eve’s skin colour. But from this pair came the diverse nations we see on earth today. It is clear the whole of creation was to be multi-coloured and diverse. For God loves diversity…
At this point a sperm donor who knew Mejier became a Whistleblower. Jonathan Mejier was not a lone wolf, he was part of a global group of mass donors who divide the world into territories with the aim of creating as many white children as possible. This is their method of bleaching the world. Their task is to rid the world of non-white nations by saturating it with white babies…
Mass donors like Jonathan Jacob Mejier are no better than Adolf Hitler. Here is a quote from serial donor Anthony Greenfield “So far, I donated sperm in the Netherlands, Belgium, Thailand, Vietnam, Philippines, Kenya, Uganda. But soon more countries will be colonised by my glorious and mighty white seed.”
Author photo below the More fold..
Elon Musk building the American surveillance state||culture-society||
But they’ll be slave labor, not gast-arbeiter moochs.
Open thread #3 today, open thread #3 tomorrow, open thread #3 forever!
LOL. Well, here's the first paragraph of one of the articles I'd linked:
Hegseth DID NOT rape that woman. The charge was so patently a lie that no one who even cursorily looked into it would see it plain-as-day. What happens when someone does these kinds of things (seizes on rumors) simply blasts his credibility generally. More, it reflects a tendency toward hysterical rhetoric.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/24/us/politics/hegseth-payment.html
Pete Hegseth, President Trump’s nominee for defense secretary, admitted to paying $50,000 as part of a legal settlement with a woman who accused him of raping her in 2017, according to Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts.
I wish you would try engaging with the issues instead of the personality.
A banker acquaintance recommended to me a white paper by Stephen Marin, of Trump’s council of economic advisors, as a key to understanding the policy.
I'd actually been thinking of suggesting the exact same thing if Steve has indeed stopped posting here.
Agreed, but also, how about this? If Mr. Sailer is really done here, then do as with the Russian guy, and have a thread once a week*. We commenters might want to still converse there. I suppose each thread could be cut off at some comment count, but they trickle off anyway, so just do it weekly. (Or iSteve could throw in a quick post to get it started each time.)
Dear Mr. Unz,
Thanks for the Sailer open threads. Unfortunately, the discussion there is not very interesting. I wonder if it would be possible to write a script that would scrape the first paragraph of text from each of Sailer’s Substacks and post it along with a link to Substack as the intro to a new open thread on TUR. This is how Sailer himself used to manage commenting at TUR on the articles he wrote for Taki’s mag. Or, if that is too cumbersome, it could be a once-a-week scrape and post of the week’s Sailer Substacks. Or maybe a long-time commenter would be willing to do something similar manually.
It’s never been more so, although some may not like it.Sailer’s purported dissidence is using race to play copium denmother for disaffected white guys skewing 40+. In practically every other respect — and, thus, effectively in that one — he endorses or stands silent on behalf of the Establishment. This had been obscured to some extent because the man abused his “at whim” moderation privileges to coddle commenters who amplified his lukewarm takes (and, apparently, a few others who sent him money) while suppressing those who refuted them. Now that the playing field is level, open discussion has shown an increasing number of us what his shtick is really about. (And without the Whimming, we can refer back to comments by number, as those no longer tick upward with each upthread blueberry emerging from heterodox purgatory.)Let things play out for the time being. A couple of the “long-time commenters” are already “scraping” his Substack posts, but even one of them is apparently becoming, pardon the cliché, red pilled about Steve Sailer.Replies: @Greta Handel
Thanks for the Sailer open threads. Unfortunately, the discussion there is not very interesting.
https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/introducing-ai-2027
Fully automated economy by 2029
and misaligned AI could turn against humanity by 2030… delightful||science||
Versus this, today, from Nathan Cofnas:
Second City Bureaucrat
@CityBureaucratThe biggest white pill is watching wallstreet chimp out.The people who wanted us to believe an ESG index (a measure of how many non-asian minorities you hired and how many environmental patronage schemes you subsidized) was efficient, and that factoring it into investment strategies was a fiduciary duty, are mewling about tariffs imposed by the largest economy on earth
MAGA Communism and the End of Americaby Nathan Cofnas
April 4, 2025[...] Two days ago, Trump’s tariffs came into effect. He called this “liberation day” because (as I understand it) he believes the tariffs will restore manufacturing in America and free us from the rest of the world that is “ripping us off.”The actual effect of the tariffs will be to halt the American economic juggernaut, discredit the anti-woke movement, pave the way for a left-wing populist like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, stop the right’s momentum in other countries, and bring an end to Pax Americana, which is the masking tape holding the pieces of the world together.Historically, the American right was better than the left on economics. But as the Republican Party degenerated into a low-IQ cult of personality, this was unsustainable.
Trump was elected largely because he was the anti-woke candidate. His executive orders on DEI were a cause for celebration. But the point of fighting DEI is to pave the way for something better—not merely to attack leftists for its own sake. If we destroy America and go back to living in caves, then we will have “won” the war on woke, but that’s not the kind of victory that we should aspire to. The goal is to bring about a better world.Here I will explain how MAGA communism is based on lies and delusions, and everything is about to blow up in our faces. [....]
https://ncofnas.com/p/maga-communism-and-the-end-of-americaReplies: @Chrisnonymous, @Almost Missouri
mob rule by ignoramuses is not an effective long-term strategy to fight wokism
I have some quibbles. For example, his argument that GDP per capita gains have not gone to the wealthy is based on an analysis that after tax income distribution is relatively unchanged. Also, his “you can buy anything now” analysis doesn’t address the issue of whether individuals buying smaetphones and $1.25 massive hotdogs at Costco is really an improvement over married people who didn’t have access to those things but skrimped to buy a little house together. There are so many issues tied to that little question. Economic analysis often focuses on how we make money–transition to a service economy–but less often on how we spend money (the structure of consumption) and what that implies for the non-economic aspects of life. Nevertheless, I am afraid Cofnas has a legitimate point about the inability of the country to go back to the economy of 50 years ago, even if that would be better for human flourishing.
So it looks like source of income and not residency is the key? That could pay off pretty quickly for extremely wealthy Americans with substantial foreign assets/income if they get the same tax deal. I wonder if we will get to find out who is buying these (I doubt it).Replies: @Chrisnonymous, @Corvinus
Donald Trump earlier suggested that those who purchase his gold card would only be subjected to tax on their US earnings and not on their overseas income. This is believed to be a major upside of the gold card and many wealthy people avoid moving to the US because green card holders have to pay global tax.
...
Trump is the first one to buy gold card though the program is not for AmericansTrump said he became the first person to buy the gold card and had no idea who would be the second. However, the program is not meant for Americans.
I don’t understand. Why would Trump, a citizen, buy a visa? Is the card really a visa status, or is it a tax status? I.e., purchase exemption from taxes on foreign income for $5m? If so, that’s a terrible program. The US just shouldn’t collect taxes on foreign income. Other countries don’t. I can’t afford to purchase that exemption for $5m, but the amount of tax revenue the treasury collects from me doesn’t make it worth the effort of processing my tax filings.
It's gold, has Trump's name on it, and cost $5M (conspicuous consumption). What could be more Trump?
Why would Trump, a citizen, buy a visa?
Dude, you just called yourself an imbecile.
I thought without Steve, we would at least lose Corvinus and Jack D too, but I see they are still posting.
Oh well. I can still look forward to Ron Unz’s next article–American Pravda: Who’s Buried in Grant’s Tomb?
With your DNA, it won’t matter….
I’m thinking the threat is a possibility in the future, not something now. For example, maybe there will be a future biometric security technology that can be broken if you have someone’s DNA.
Or maybe in the future, someone will create designer diseases that can target individuals or very small numbers of people. Actually building viruses is not that economically resource intensive, so maybe with all of (future doxxed) Unz commenters’ DNA, I could make up a batch of viruses that would target them…?
or maybe in some future legal system, I’ll be able to clone you and claim all your property belongs to the clone.
You misspelled Pam Bondi. (That will probably turn out to be the only thing she's good for.)Replies: @Chrisnonymous
Nobody really cares what Candace Owens has to say... She should just go on Only Fans and pose nude.
You obviously haven’t seen high-res close-ups of Pam Bondi’s face. Pam Anderson at 30000 feet; Emperor Palpatine at 3 feet.
Yes. If you read Mr. Unz’s American Pravda articles, you’ll find he considers her very likely to be not controlled opposition but promoted opposition.
The Republicans elected an amoral charlatan over better candidates.
LOL. You’re a moron.
I think a semi-literate will being produced by the man who wrote the plays is so far beyond the pale that it alone virtually precludes Shakespere being Shakespeare.
It’s all a bit sad as the story of the bard from Avon is one of the great ones of Anglophone history. However, since the isles are descending into barbarism and the west is in its death-throes anyway, better to know the truth than maintain the civilization-undergirding lie.
Sure, North studied law as a young man and probably wrote his first play, about his murderous half-sister, at that time. He also served a couple of times as justice of the peace in Cambridgeshire.Replies: @Chrisnonymous
Was Thomas North ever a lawyer?
The McCarthy book and Substack look interesting from your summaries, although I haven’t read them. Is there any chance that McCarthy’s work with the plagiarism software is inaccurate? Has anyone else duplicated his findings?
If Oxford bought North’s work and reworked it for publication but wrote the sonnets himself, I would assume there is some difference in style between the sonnets and the plays and also within the plays themselves between parts lifted from North and parts original to Oxford. Also, if Oxford bought other non-North works and re-worked them into the plays that scholars have removed from the canon, there should be similarities between the Oxford parts of the North-inspired plays and the Oxford parts of the the others. I would imagine AI, if not already able to figure all this out now, will able to do so in the near future.
By the way, do you regard North as the true fountainhead of modern English that Shakespeare has traditionally been considered, or Oxford? Also, do you have an opinion about why North’s non-dramatic works have not been remembered more prominently in the history of English composition?
As Colin Wright said, so what? These tapes are a low-life liar talking about a former rival and possible ex-friend. Did Trump make passes at European models? Undoubtedly. I would too if I were a billionaire with access to them. Did he specialize in seducing the wives of his married friends? Unlikely. Where are the complaints from these men and women, or are they all still married decades later and so disdainful of the limelight? Ha!
Trump’s old comment about Epstein–“he likes them young”–shows that he knew there was something a bit off about Epstein, and it’s confirmed by the Mar-a-Lago club ban on Epstein he imposed , showing that he knew Epstein was a predator. Photos of them together show them at public parties where there were lots of guests, not like the Prince Andrew photo with Giuffre, and they seem not to have had contact for a long time before 2015.
Trump’s choices of women as girlfriends show he likes voluptuous women –no hebephile he! Witness depositions universally confirm Trump was not involved with Epstein’s girls.
Trump was also “friends” (whatever that means) with Bill “safe legal and rare” Clinton, but facilitated the end of Roe vs Wade. So, what do his previous associations mean for our politics today? Essentially nothing.
These Daily Beast pieces and videos are an embarrassment of credulousness to those who make much of them. That’s why they’ve never gotten more traction in the MSM or in campaigns.
If it works out well, it could be like that.
I like to think that “wife goggles” are a thing, when you’ve been married a long time you still see the face you married.
The women in Japan age incredibly well. Many women remain attractive into their 60s. Unfortunately for them, Japan has a major focus on youth, such that young girls are sometimes sexualized when they should not be and older women who are truly attractive are considered dried up and past being interesting.
We recently traveled to Singapore and there the contrast between the Chinese, Malays, Indians, Thais, etc and the Caucasians was shocking. The “minorities” are all thin and healthy looking even into old age, but the Caucasians are universally overweight and often gross-looking (skin and personal grooming) and slovenly dressed after their 30s. Caucasian women de-sexualize themselves by gaining weight, wearing shower-curtain clothes, and cutting their hair short. It’s pretty shocking.
I don’t believe this is a racial thing. Something went wrong in Anglophone culture in the mid-20th-century. Jogging, low-fat vegetarian craze, restaurant portions, feminism, universal car ownership…
Yes, I went to university with several.
So, what caused Steve to finally leave? Was it the yoga pants controversy?
Also, will discussion of golf course architecture continue here?
Sure, I've never looked at 4chan/pol/ but that's pretty close to my impression as well. I think part of that approach has been a heavy reliance on Memes and a sharp decline in reading anything longer than a Tweet.
Big difference in groups that prefer articles vs those who prefer podcasts.
Also, am increasingly aware of the age gap differences, between a site like Unz Review which is demographically rather ‘boomer’ in its authors and commenters … and perhaps the major repository of conspiracy radical thinking, 4chan /pol/, which is dominated by age 18 to 40 males from Western countries, so younger millennials and zoomers...
For example, tho there is much sweat and anguish on Unz Review over ‘nuclear weapons’ & WW3 etc, half the youth on /pol/ will quickly chime in saying that ‘nuke bombs’ are a big absurd hoax believed by older people, with Hiroshima & Nagasaki seen as in fact chemical firebombings like Dresden or Tokyo etc.
‘Moon landing’ claims are seen as almost beyond the pale of believability. The ‘space stations’ are heavily doubted. Flat earth is directly argued
Young people have serious trouble with the kind of discernment you call for in this article. The popularity of Graham Hancock’s ancient civilization theories is evidence. I recently sent a 30-something friend an YT video interview with a professional archaeologist debunking much of that, and he simply got agitated and stated that old men were just trying to defend their own outdated ideas. He thinks humans developed from some space alien visitations, but he is completely closed to the idea that there are hereditary differences in IQ or personality between races. Although one of his beliefs is fringe and the other very, very mainstream, they both reflect a kind of refusal to critically accept the world as described by evidence and reason.
depending upon the timing and the circumstances, it’s possible that neither Macron nor any of Brigitte’s children might have ever been aware of what had happened decades earlier.
This seems implausible to me. People in intimate daily contact with someone would be aware of gaps in shared memories, changes in tastes, etc.
You are right about Owens on several fronts. My 80+ yo parents saw her program on the Liberty and were floored by it, as it was all new to them. But also, I suspect you are right about “promoted opposition”.
In 2015, YouTube algorithm suggested Bowden videos to me and I binge-watched them. They are terrific. But after Trump won, the left started their soft censorship scheme. Bowden videos are never recommended to me now. I’m surprised they are even allowed and not taken down. But that’s a benefit to us because we can still listen to them. He is good enough that he is a pleasure to listen to ecen if you disagree with him.
Steve posts old review of Judith Rich Harris’s The Nurture Assumption.
https://www.stevesailer.net/p/the-nurture-assumption-by-judith
I’m shocked how weak that one is though. Harris’ thesis is very narrowly trained on parenting’s contribution to personality (as defined in psych literature) development, not global outcomes including things like choice of career, which makes many of. Steve’s comments (like citing Sowell) red herrings.
Also, it overlooks the interesting question about peer group generational interactions. For example, it’s possible that fathering has a far different impact in a community in which 95% of children are raised in intact homes vs one in which 5% of children are. Perhaps 95% intact leads to a situation in which the remaining 5% are “fathered” indirectly via their peer group.
I guess that essay is Sailer’s contribution to the Living in Wonder moment, as proclaimed by Rod Dreher ( https://roddreher.substack.com/p/downloads-and-the-demonic ).
Peter Thiel has recently been talking about End Times, as in Armageddon and Anti-Christ, which is funny because he may the world’s leading candidate for the Anti-Christ, or he may be Saruman to the Anti-Christ’s Sauron. Only thing is we already know he’s the rainbow wizard, not the white wizard. Somebody should clue in Rod Dreher.
Other ways the moment is expressed: “the meaning crisis,” which is being blamed for ” Ortho bro” phenomenon of young men joining the Greek and Russian Orthodox churches, and “advent of the sacred”.
Maybe the point is that it’s not that the right is woo, but that everybody is woo. The Anglo-non-woo tradition is dying maybe too as the WASPs and the UK commit suicide*. Nowhere to run to, baby; nowhere to hide!
* I wanted to coin a new word here: dysgenicide. It’s a high-fallutin’ term for the Great Replacement, or Creolization as Melenchon would put it.
I absolutely agree and have already written a post on that point. You could pay these people money to go shoot pool (dating myself here) all day long, and we'd still come out way ahead. Wipe out the people and agencies that impede America. However, this latest USAID story is beyond even what I thought goes on - the tears of the ctrl-left are almost too much for me. My Doc says to keep an eye on that sodium! I'm eating a banana as I type to counterbalance it. I've become a Banana Republican lately.Replies: @Hypnotoad666, @Chrisnonymous, @AnotherDad
DOGE’s benefit isn’t so much saving money– more than ¾ of spending is either military or untouchable “entitlements”… or paying off creditors.
If you’re having BP issues, you should go on a ketogenic diet, do some exercise, and stop drinking anything except water. Eating a banana for potassium is like taking a potassium supplement with a spoonful of sugar. Also, the research behind the sodium-BP connection is weak. My sense of the situation is that it is like protein-kidney disease. If you are already sick, protein is bad for kidneys, but protein does not cause kidney disease. Likewise, salt is problematic only when your BP/fluid balance systems are already broken. You should aim at the root causes.
David Reuben wrote about this in one of his nutrition books-- much better than his sex books, and more useful, too-- almost 50 years ago. He pointed out that potassium was present in almost every natural food, and there was no need for supplements for it, or, really, supplements for anything else. Get everything from your diet, not pills.
Eating a banana for potassium is like taking a potassium supplement with a spoonful of sugar.
The legal wording means he may accept and run advertising, so long as it's "unpaid":
I am so glad for the complete lack of ads
One thing Steve Sailer has never done even once, to my knowledge, is to hawk water-filters, nutrition tablets, t-shirts, gold-bar management services, or any other service or product. Not in his entire 25-year blogging career. I know there are Sailernalia-knowers who may be reading this whose knowledge exceeds my own (MEH 0910, and mamy others) , but I feel confident in what I say: Sailer either never hawked products or, if he did briefly, he skillfully buried the evidence.Replies: @Achmed E. Newman, @Chrisnonymous
CONTACT US-- Email Us (Ron at Unz dot com)IMPORTANT NOTE: We do NOT accept paid advertising, and any solicitations on that topic will be reported as SPAM.---------------------------- Mailing Address:The Unz Review
555 Bryant St. #371
Palo Alto, CA 94301
There is one product that you apparently didn’t notice. Not noticing that product seems hard to do, but noticing is in the eye of the beholder, so to speak. I myself noticed the product being pushed on many occassions, and I think there were many noticers noticing it on this website because we were put on notice that it had sold out at one point. If you notice anything odd about this post, then you may be noticing a clue too!
1.3% fatality rate is just the flu.
Actually it’s an interesting psychological point that people could dismiss low fatality disease but be very worried about rolling the dice with a comet.
It sounds vaguely like the peak oil/peak energy theories that posit that civilization cannot be rebuilt in the future because the easy-to-access sources of fossil fuels have been used up, leaving behind only those that require technology dependent on fossil fuels to access.
Here’s my plot for sci-fi end of world thriller:
Trump and Musk solve Palestinian problem by flying all the Gazans to Mars. Then a celebratory Israel is destroyed by a massive comet, leaving the Holy Land desolate. The Gazans can’t get their stuff together enough to survive on Mars, but they can’t return to Earth. Speculator Vivek Ramaswamy buys all the Holy Land at dirt cheap prices and flips it, selling it off to wealthy high-caste Indians who want to escape “the worst country”. Then Razib Khan reveals that the latest genomic studies show that the Aryan invasion of northern India was actually the settling of northern India by the Ten Lost Tribes, meaning Vivek’s land speculation has led to fulfillment of Bible end times prophecy.
Of all the lazy & dumb posts that SS has dropped here since he wisely moved over to substack, this is surely the laziest & dumbest.
a guy who is obviously bad news?
2 weeks to flatten the curve!
Isn’t that Chuck Schumer on the left?
Maybe Biden is legion!!
Best EO:
Stripping the security clearances from the Dirty 51 signers of the “Hunter’s Laptop was a Russian Op” election interference letter, plus John Bolton.
Couldn’t have happened to a better gaggle of political whores pretending to be objective intelligence professionals
LOL. Boris Brasol must be one of the most astonishing individuals in all of human history.
The protocols were first popularized in the English-speaking world not by British newspapers in 1920 but by Russian monarchist agent Boris Brasol two years earlier. It was Brasol who directly influenced Ford and many others. Much of the American military intelligence reports mentioned by the author relied on known forgeries by Brasol and other Russian monarchist agents. Can’t discuss the protocols without mentioning Brasol: https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/11/26/boris-brasol-protocols-of-zion-00128223
On your previous article’s recommendation, I read Douglas Reed’s The Controversy of Zion. You mention Reed’s lack of documentation. Subsequent unrelated researches have revealed to me that the theories Reed puts forward in his early chapters are highly suggestive that he was familiar with 19th and early 20th century academic biblical criticism. The theories he seems to incorporate have now been revised or rejected by later scholars, but it reveals him to be well-read rather than a crank.
Also, good catch on the Indiana Jones movies defaming Hilaire Belloc. The character’s name is René Belloq, and the historical author had 4 given names: Joseph Hilaire Pierre René Belloc. One quibble, though: in the movie, Belloq is not a Nazi but a Frenchy, as was the historical author.
I read part of Belloc’s The Jews and found it unobjectionable, but I understand why he would be out of favor now. I think he has been inoculated against total cancellation by friendship with Chesterton, which puts him just a few degrees of separation away from modern Evangelicals (Evangelical reader –CS Lewis — GK Chesterton –Belloc). Despite what some of the authors you publish claim (e.g., Guyenot), the churches are still an intellectual bulwark of independent thought. That can change, however. There is a theological movement now called “New Christian Zionism.” In addition to rejecting Premillenial Dispensationalism, one of the distinguishing characteristics of NCZ is its woke-ish, uncritical acceptance of Christian responsibility for historical anti-Semitism and the Holocaust.
Thanks. I'd actually missed that Belloq's first name was also one of Belloc's, which strongly confirms my suspicion that the identification was deliberate. But my impression had been that Belloq was portrayed as a French Nazi, though perhaps he was only a Nazi ally or Nazi sympathizer.
Also, good catch on the Indiana Jones movies defaming Hilaire Belloc. The character’s name is René Belloq, and the historical author had 4 given names: Joseph Hilaire Pierre René Belloc. One quibble, though: in the movie, Belloq is not a Nazi but a Frenchy, as was the historical author.
I never meant to claim that Reed was a crank, but that his undocumented, posthumously published and extremely conspiratorial work was "unreliable" and should be treated with great caution. For example, I vaguely recall that Reed claimed that Hitler had originally been an early Bolshevik and also that he might have escaped death at the end of WWII. However, I did also say that on the huge number of issues in which he disagrees with the standard historical narrative, he was probably 70-80% correct.Replies: @Skeptikal
On your previous article’s recommendation, I read Douglas Reed’s The Controversy of Zion. You mention Reed’s lack of documentation. Subsequent unrelated researches have revealed to me that the theories Reed puts forward in his early chapters are highly suggestive that he was familiar with 19th and early 20th century academic biblical criticism. The theories he seems to incorporate have now been revised or rejected by later scholars, but it reveals him to be well-read rather than a crank.
they could not even begin to comprehend why a mayor went to a foreign country to the inauguration of a leader there….
… there was a deafening silence for quite a long time.
… saying nothing at all and everyone just shook their head.
You must live in a rural area (i.e., not Tokyo, Yokohama, Nagoya, nor Osaka). Where I live, many have already internalized the lies.
Am I the crazy one when I hate the douche who pulls out the guitar at the bon fire? Those horrible droning songs. I’d rather get drunk and talk about beaver.
The doors operate in different ways in different locations, and they do not exist at every station. However, they do exist. In Japan, the problem is not people being pushed onto the tracks but people jumping onto them to commit suicide. The gates prevent one and would prevent the other just as well though.
I am no fan of the education system, but the issue here is not only about education. Tech employers are not sitting around saying “anyone! at any wage! please!”. They are trying to cut wages by bringing in people who will live in dormitory or hostel conditions and spend all their time at work and who risk having their visas revoked if they complain about anything. I’m sure American young people could improve their work ethic as well as their knowledge base, but expecting people to forgo family formation to find jobs is unreasonable. On the hand, if the foreign workers really are that much smarter (I doubt it), then the visa are importing a foreign overclass. These are really the two main issues–both related to the social consequences –not the inability of native American tech sector to compete economically.
Trump saying he has H1-B holders “on his properties” puts the lie to the whole thing. He’s not talking about 0.1% engineers but people doing the dishes and laundry.
Just as I said, it turns out Trump doesn’t use H1B workers…
Trump saying he has H1-B holders “on his properties” puts the lie to the whole thing. He’s not talking about 0.1% engineers but people doing the dishes and laundry.
Musk’s 50% comment is not incompatible with his 0.1% comment, but as Steve points out on Substack, we need to have a better test than the GRE. Musk seems to be saying that some Ramaswamies will try to pass as 0.1% people by defrauding the system and you can ID the fraudsters with the GRE. Not total betrayal but Steve’s idea of making the test more rigorous is good. What they actually need is an immigration-specific test. Any test that is mildly challenging for Musk will do. This would be his greatest contribution: be the test-taker.
But actually the testing question doesn’t matter because Trump and Musk don’t care. The best we can hope for is deporting the Guatemalan guy who sets women on fire in the subway. That wouldn’t be nothing.
Just as I said, it turns out Trump doesn't use H1B workers...
Trump saying he has H1-B holders “on his properties” puts the lie to the whole thing. He’s not talking about 0.1% engineers but people doing the dishes and laundry.
I’m going to put the paywall here. Another 1,259 words beneath the break. C’mon, you know you want to subscribe.
Nope!
Pardons are a harkening back to a system that is best left behind in medieval times, o
Totally disagree. Pardons are part of the checks and balances system. They rpovide an opportunity for the Executive to cancel the actions of the Judiciary or Legislature. Along with the ban on statutory law that targets individuals, they are part of the Constitution’s attempt to prevent the political machine from trampling over individuals.
The fact that pardons may not have been used much in the past is immaterial. By their nature, they will be used less in good times and more in times of political conflict. If they are misused or overused, it’s a small price to pay for having a safety valve.
The bigger problem is that pardons will not be used equally by both sides, which the founders didn’t see. Trump should pardon all the J6 rioters because they are mistreated, over-prosecuted political prisoners, but he won’t. Sorry for them. But he should, and the Constitution should afford him the chance.
Who cares? Personal vindictiveness against the Bidens isn’t going to get us anywhere. The Bidens are finished in politics, and other leftists won’t learn anything from a prosecution of a “cocaine addict.”. Much more important is wreaking havoc in the 3 -letter agencies and increasing transparency and reducing classified materials
I believe Madonna was 28 when she played a pregnant teen in "Papa Don't Preach" in 1986. By the way, that song is an interesting glimpse into a very different era. Lots of things that were true back then are no longer true.
Beyond the nose, the essence of witchiness is a face that looks attractive when young but isn’t likely to age well: Think of Sarah Jessica Parker in 1991’s L.A. Story or Madonna in 1985’s Desperately Seeking Susan. Madonna looked plenty sexy then, but you also couldn’t help noticing that without pervasive plastic surgery there would come a time when the only role she’d be suitable for is fattening up Hansel for dinner.
Yeah, I noticed that too. Blacks get really old-looking when they're young, then stay at that age for a long time. Whites are just the opposite. Very baby-faced in their youth, but then they begin to age quickly in their mid 20s and end up looking quite different by middle age.
Erivo, in contrast, has that black-don’t-crack look where it’s hard to tell whether she is 30 or 60. (I was pleased to see that black jazz genius Miles Davis vindicated my observation in his autobiography that it’s hard to tell how old black people are.)
By the way, has anyone noticed that people looked older in the past?
Increased prevalence of smoking and universal exposure to second-hand smoke combined with lower levels of body fat.
, but I really wish I could understand the thinking behind it
I assume it is being used to signal that you should always keep in mind who is doing the enslaving and slave-holding. “Enslaved laborers” is supposed to make the reader think “Enslaved [by whites] laborers.”. This would be easier to stomach if black people today were referred to as “freed [by whites] laborers” or “supported [by white taxpayers] welfare recipients” or “protected [by white police] citizens,” etc.
Chinese architecture is nice but extremely repetitive. There is nothing like the variety of beautiful styles found in Europe.
Japanese native architecture is a style I call “refined primitive” . It is related to the buildings of island peoples of the South Pacific. Amongst other points, you can see this from the floors, which are wood up on stilts in traditional Japanese buildings. Chinese buildings have stone floors at ground level.
Chinese and Japanese furniture is universally uncomfortable and uninteresting, although in different ways.
Chinese/Japanese statues (e.g., Buddhas) are derivative of Greece and came to the East via the Alexandrian conquests.
Chinese/Japanese painting and calligraphy is interesting when you see it in an art textbook but less impressive after you are immersed in it.
The art in the Palace Museum in Taipei shows an interest in miniaturization, which is technically difficult but has little aesthetic interest. The museum also has lots of examples of calligraphy, whose appreciation is, I contend,based in psychology rather than aesthetics –more akin to a cross between art appreciation and handwriting analysis.
Textiles and clothing design is where the two cultures really created beauty. In my opinion, clothing, like food culture, which both also refined to a high degree, is a very practical interest and pursuit. Everyone needs clothing and food, and they provide immediate sensual pleasure which is easier to access than higher art. That the East expresses itself in these modes is related to their interest in war, technology, and business.
To each his own. I find the Gothic style exceptionally ugly. Flying Buttresses? OMG what an inefficient waste of material.
Chinese architecture is nice but extremely repetitive. There is nothing like the variety of beautiful styles found in Europe.
Chinese/Japanese statues (e.g., Buddhas) are derivative of Greece and came to the East via the Alexandrian conquests.You are apparently referring to the Gandhara style of Buddha statues. Even in South Asia, there are different styles and Gandhara is just one of them. You are right that Greek realism played a part in influencing the Buddha statues around Afghanistan. But have you seen the majority of Buddha statues in China? Are the Gandharan?
Why do you dwell on the floors of these buildings?
Japanese native architecture is a style I call “refined primitive” . It is related to the buildings of island peoples of the South Pacific. Amongst other points, you can see this from the floors, which are wood up on stilts in traditional Japanese buildings. Chinese buildings have stone floors at ground level.
Chinese and Japanese furniture is universally uncomfortable and uninteresting, although in different ways.Uncomfortable to you because you are used to a different way of living.I can tell it will be a waste of my time to answer the rest of your points, because it is clear to me, that you are one of those guys who get a superficial glimpse at another culture, do not bother to understand it in depth, misunderstand it, then dismiss it because of a racial arrogance.From your observations, you are clearly not technically inclined in either engineering or architecture. Your references to art are uninformed. So it leaves me to guess that you are in Japan teaching English.Now you go to Japan, take their money, then turn around and insult them.Replies: @Blissex
There are multiple contributing factors, including Richard Lynn's very plausible "cold winters hypothesis" and also the extreme diligence required in wet rice farming to maintain a massive population density. Japanese society had also been relatively stable for well over a thousand years, which was certainly a contributing factor. Japanese have certainly done well both in Japan and as small minorities in the West.
Japanese long had a caste system, one that might even be called feudalistic...Yet, despite these and many other differences, the Japanese and Chinese are almost identical in IQ and talent.
I teach in a Japanese university that has Chinese foreign students and, although anecdotal, I would not bet on the Japanese.
One interesting point is that your article is focused entirely on economics and technology. I visited the Forbidden city in Beijing and was shocked at its deficit of art. So, I recently made the trek to the Palace Museum in Taipei, which is supposed to have that wonderful artistic heritage. It was very unimpressive. The two most prized objects are a tiny piece of jade carved to look like a cabbage and a small stone that looks like a piece of pork belly. I think it is telling that these two prized objects are images of food rather something heavenly.
Trump was trailing Biden by 7.9% in the national polls and he was trailing in all the swing states on this date in 2020.
However, Trump had the enthusiasm and the momentum in 2020 too, but it wasn’t enough.
Glad you were right!!
Trump just held a rally in a Madison Square Garden, and packed it to the rafters, and most people ignored the dog that didn’t bark: no riots or even major protests.
We can’t know who will win, but we do know what will happen after the victory.
Trump wins – we will have riots
I think it is easy to get caught up in things, what with the “divine” bullet-dodge and whatnot. However, Trump had the enthusiasm and the momentum in 2020 too, but it wasn’t enough. The Republicans squandered (on purpose?) the last four years, and all the structural problems that helped Biden are still in place. Plus, the abortion voters.
I want to hope, but I suspect there will be a narrow Harris victory.
People expecting a Trumpslide need to remember the 2022 Red Wave that never materialized.
If Trump does win, I think there will be an internal battle within the administration between a “tech” faction that wants essentially progressive policies (immigration, strong government support of technological competition with China, continuing GAE entanglements) with non-woke governing norms (free speech, no court packing, less DEI and AA) and a “hard-core” faction that is mildly isolationist and protectionist. The “tech” faction will win out. Expect no one inside the White House to be for extreme measures like actually closing the border, deporting recent immigrants, or dismantling the DHS/DNI construct.
But I suspect a narrow Harris victory followed by four more years of anonymous White House persons actually running the government while the media cover up Harris/Walz gaffs. Without charismatic leadership, it will be difficult for Dems to push through big changes in gun laws, court packing, etc. However, Reps will continue to bend over for the border.
Trump was trailing Biden by 7.9% in the national polls and he was trailing in all the swing states on this date in 2020.
However, Trump had the enthusiasm and the momentum in 2020 too, but it wasn’t enough.
I love your website and agree with the vast majority of articles published here, however I have to disagree with your conclusions in this one. I know there are many people who have improved their health and lost weight changing from the standard american diet to the ketogenic diet. But there are serious concerns about the long term health benefits of this diet. An alternative dietary approach is the Whole Foods Plant Based diet promoted by Dean Ornish, John McDougall and others. These diets also don’t recommend the consumption of sugar or refined carbohydrates. Dean Ornish has done studies that showed improvements and cardiovascular health with this diet. Also more recently he has done studies showing improvements with people who suffering from Alzheimer’s Disease. A good source of source of non-biased information regarding this diet approach is provided in the website nutritionfacts.org by Michael Greger, M.D. In this recent article he addressed some of the issues of the ketogenic diet: https://nutritionfacts.org/blog/testing-the-keto-diet-theory/
No, no. The musical has to start after the “Athenians” have already put their knee on “Socrates’s” neck.
Problematic: did Socrates ask for his mama after he took Hemlock? Kind of the opposite.
Also, why rap it up? Not much room for growth in that genre.
He could do a rap version of the Phaedo with George Floyd dialoguing with the crowd on the sidewalk about how the body entraps the soul.
It’s obviously more political: there aren’t Republican and Democrat chemists.
There didn’t used to be Democrat and Republican rocket scientists, either, but now…
In the late-90s/early-00s, my local uni library made space for more computer terminals by reducing their stacks (by throwing decades-old hard-bound books into the trash), which makes women not only the majority book-buyers but the majority book-burners, which seems about right.
It looks like Scott Alexander is suspending his book review contest next year. Too bad. It would have been to submit a review of “Noticing.”
If Friedman had become a boxer instead of an economist, “Hurricane” would have been a good nickname.
I would think “Chicago” would be a more apropos title with respect to the winds emanating from Friedman.
If Friedman had become a boxer instead of an economist, “Hurricane” would have been a good nickname.
Thanks. That’s a good assessment. Lowry was a mistake, but fundamentally the project was doomed to fail once the Cold War had ended.
Don’t you live in CA, around the corner from Steve?
You both need to get out of CA.
The land can repair itself, but the polity cannot recover until it dies.
Unz, this is one of the dumbest articles you’ve posted on Unz. There are lots of attractive Jews. For example, here is perhaps the best looking Hollywood actress in modern history, Scarlett Johansson, crying about her Polish Jewish heritage….
And here is a random Wikimedia image of a random similar-looking Jewish girl…
“Girls of the IDF” is a well-known meme for good reason. Even Ruth Bader Ginsberg was not so ugly as a young woman. It’s really her aging that affected her punim.
There are. I went to high school with many of them.But there is a subset of Jewishness that is goofily ugly in a space alienlike way.Like Woody Allen and Carolyn Ellison. They are like mutants.Same with the Chinese. The ugly ones are really really ugly.And then there is the Negression to the Mean.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXE7TFD93s0https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bi1RcgfQhY8
There are lots of attractive Jews.
https://nettv4u.com/imagine/ellen-barkin.jpg
Replies: @Wokechoke
https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/t_fit-1000w,f_auto,q_auto:best/newscms/2020_50/3434777/201210-natalie-portman-jm-1049.jpg
The problem for Amy Wax, which is made clear by Steve’s post, is that she spoke from her impressions rather than from data. If the top 25% of the class is publicly released as Steve says, she should have done the work of investigating the actual stats instead of talking about her memories and feelings. If she had said, “only 1 black student has graduated summa, magna, or cum laude in the last 25 years,” she would be unreproachable. Of course, despite having multiple degrees in serious fields, she is still a woman, so I guess we shouldn’t be surprised, you know.
.
If she had said, “only 1 black student has graduated summa, magna, or cum laude in the last 25 years,” she would be unreproachable
You are comparing two disparate datasets. Wax is talking about her entire career at Penn, i.e. 20+ years of law students. Steve's data is for class of 2024. We have no idea if previous years honor lists were released at all and it was certainly not easy to get pics identifying each student easily as it now is. Fwiw, Wax's 'impression/memory' holds up for 2024 and I would bet it holds up for the entirety of her tenure at Penn.
The problem for Amy Wax, which is made clear by Steve’s post, is that she spoke from her impressions rather than from data. If the top 25% of the class is publicly released as Steve says, she should have done the work of investigating the actual stats instead of talking about her memories and feelings.