how well has that worked out for Ukraine?Or anyone who has ever trusted and partnered with ZOG. In the end, they always get it in the end.Replies: @AKAHorace
Why not take it from the Israelis ?
I don’t think that you can blame the war in the Ukraine on the Israelis. They are not pro-Russian but they are a lot more even handed than most western countries ? Or are you blaming them for not being pro-Ukrainian enough ? You shouldnt, they have enough enemies without getting involved in another conflict.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel%E2%80%93Russia_relations
Also, what do you expect Somaliland to do ? They need recognition and probably deserve it.
not the 'Israelis' per se, but rather the international banking dynasties that funded and fomented the Bolshevik revolution, both World Wars, and created Israel out of the ashes of Europe. They're the ones who're orchestrating the Great Replacement in the Western world, the Ukraine war, the Gaza genocide, and now the great betrayal of the Trump regime to his America-first base, who elected him to *not* wage any more Jew wars. They own the central banks of the West and beyond, the media of the Western world in absolute terms, they control the universities and courts and other institutions of the dying Western world, they own Big Pharma, Big Tech, and foisted the Climate Justice hoax, and the Covid hysteria, and 9/11, (and likely murdered Charlie Kirk), because they control the money supply, and with that nefarious power, are able to buy up everything else, and corrupt the governments under their Talmudic, power-crazed sphere of influence- most of the West, and beyond.Now they want Somaliland as a launching pad to wage more wars, and terrorize more people. This is all common knowledge for the people here, so you have a long way to go.
I don’t think that you can blame the war in the Ukraine on the Israelis.
thanks
IS is a CIA/Mossad creation, wherever it may be. al-Shabaab is its rival, designated as ‘terrorist’ in much the same manner as Hamas is: because it interferes with the hegemonic objectives of the usual suspects.
It seems to me that the Dubya Bush regime was when all pretense of any American resistance to ZOG fell away, and the federal government was being controlled directly from Tel Aviv. I do suspect there was some shred of autonomy from Trump I, but then it reverted back to direct control from Bibi during the Biden regime. Where Biden not only wasn't consulted, but was contemptuously ignored as utterly irrelevant. An auto-pen rubber stamp.
Of course, the Bush administration was notorious for its neoconservative policies, so none of this comes as any surprise.
That's what I'm hearing. Why do the Arab and other Islamic nations tolerate it?Replies: @muh muh, @AKAHorace
Currently, Israel would like a foothold in Somaliland for more than one reason.
Currently, Israel would like a foothold in Somaliland for more than one reason.
That’s what I’m hearing. Why do the Arab and other Islamic nations tolerate it?
Somaliland is a success story by Somali standards but does not have international recognition and so needs any help that it can get. Why not take it from the Israelis ? Ethiopia (I know, not Arab or Islamic but close by) would welcome any international support that Somaliland gets as they need access to the sea.
how well has that worked out for Ukraine?Or anyone who has ever trusted and partnered with ZOG. In the end, they always get it in the end.Replies: @AKAHorace
Why not take it from the Israelis ?
Bibi has recognized Somaliland.
I hope Trump doesn’t do so precipitously. It is import to send all the Somalis back first.
I don’t think that there is any connection between these two things. Somaliland is pretty stable by African standards. Supporting it would reduce Somali emigration. There are also geopolitical arguements for recognizing it, it is giving the Ethiopians access to the sea.
Sailer has demonstrated a massive blind spot in regards to WWII and the events leading up to it.
No, we talk too much about WWII already. In popular debate, every dictator is a Hitler, every negotiation with unfriendly foreigners Chamberlain at Munich, every massacre a holocaust and any party that tries to reduce immigration Nazis. We are so stuck in the past that we cannot see what it happening around us now.
One thing that I enjoy about Sailer is that his WWII comparisons are relatively rare.
Does Steve really think the 1920s-30s German "Anti-Faschistsche Aktion" political street-muscle groups didn't care at all about Hitler and the rival "brown-shirts," and that they -- the century-ago "Antifa" -- mainly targeted the German Social Democratic Party?He may have been trying to do some hyperbole but went too far and got lost at sea.Replies: @AKAHorace, @Mike Tre
Antifa originated in the Weimar Republic in the 1920s as Stalin’s bullyboys who fought in the streets his chief enemies, the leftist Social Democrats, whom the Soviet supremo denounced as “social fascists.” As a student of Marxist historical science, Stalin was convinced that the main enemy of his Communists were Socialists, while rightists like Hitler were merely a doomed distraction.Not surprisingly, German Antifa were a failure at stopping the Nazis because they were so focused on overthrowing Stalin’s foes, such as elected Social Democrats like Hermann Müller.
A lot of the German left did not take Hitler seriously at first. See “Round Heads and Pointy Heads” by Bertoldt Brecht.
Also, the Communists refused to unite with the Social Democrats against the Nazis.
So the Antifa concept started early, when Hitler was only a Bavarian politician.
The Communists were not long in recognising their foe. They tried to break up Hitler’s meetings, and in the closing days of 1921 he organised his first units of storm troopers.
Best wishes for you and your brother.
Reports from within Spanish-speaking countries and international organizations indicate child sexual abuse is a significant issue,not something that is normal or accepted
Child sexual abuse may not be accepted in Latin America, but large age gaps between husbands and wives are. I know this from conversation with Latins, couples that I have seen together and evidence from television soap operas (the hero in his late 40s with an 18 year old girlfriend who gringos looked down on).
There’s a data perception problem with this map because it effectively treats Indian tribes as modern nation states with borders and modern populations. A lot of that area was empty, and some territories overlapped.
There is also a large area on the map in the Eastern US (South of the Erie, north of the Shawnee) for which there is nothing known. Can anyone here explain that ?
David Cole seems like a very common type of Jew: he compulsively advances outrageous propositions in an attempt to get attention.
Above from David Cole.
David Cole seems like a very common type of Jew: he compulsively advances outrageous propositions in an attempt to get attention.
Very Jewish and when he is at his best very funny. His criticisms of the more extreme MAGAs is spot on.
Oh for sure. They're ideological fashionistas demonstrating how au courant they are with their professed sentiments. Witness the keying of Teslas if you have any doubt just how superficial their concern is. And God forbid nuclear power. It's bad: Jane Fonda said so.
'...One reason that I do not trust the “warmers” is that they ignore solutions such as nuclear energy as they don’t match their agenda for changing society.'
Oh for sure. They’re ideological fashionistas demonstrating how au courant they are with their professed sentiments. Witness the keying of Teslas if you have any doubt just how superficial their concern is. And God forbid nuclear power. It’s bad: Jane Fonda said so.
However, none of that demonstrates that global warming isn’t happening, or that we shouldn’t seriously address it.
Agree completely. Too many people think that they have disproved an argument by showing that those who support it are hypocrites, dishonest or unpleasant.
As to iron in the sea, I’ll take your word for it — but more generally, no one ever seems to want to act to positively affect the balance. They just want Asian peasants to agree they should go back to walking seven miles to the market instead of using a motorbike.
Again agree. But please read the links that I sent you earlier. He claims that sequestering CO2 can be done easily and that the side effects will include restoring barren areas of the ocean so that they can yield more fish. It is not my word, I have read the articles, they sound as if they make sense but I would welcome an intelligent second opinion on them. The only voices that I have heard against them are from those who want Asian peasants to walk.
I live in MAGA country. This bears no relationship to anything I have heard around here.Replies: @AKAHorace
'MAGA’s all about coupling, bundling. “You want closed borders? You have to buy the Holocaust denial package...'
‘MAGA’s all about coupling, bundling. “You want closed borders? You have to buy the Holocaust denial package…’
Above from David Cole.
I live in MAGA country. This bears no relationship to anything I have heard around here.
It does sound a lot like some of the posters here though.
David Cole seems like a very common type of Jew: he compulsively advances outrageous propositions in an attempt to get attention.
Above from David Cole.
To be sure: the rest of the world is a problem.
Not bad ideas, but given the way China and India are pumping out greenhouse gases, not sufficient.
But we could start, and we could at least ameliorate the problem, and I challenge you to show what part of my programme is prohibitively expensive.
None it seems too expensive. But check the link that I sent about ocean fertilization with iron. It looks as if it could be an easy stopgap solution until carbon emissions can be reduced. I am unsure about global warming and distrust anyone who is too sure about it. One reason that I do not trust the “warmers” is that they ignore solutions such as nuclear energy as they don’t match their agenda for changing society.
Oh for sure. They're ideological fashionistas demonstrating how au courant they are with their professed sentiments. Witness the keying of Teslas if you have any doubt just how superficial their concern is. And God forbid nuclear power. It's bad: Jane Fonda said so.
'...One reason that I do not trust the “warmers” is that they ignore solutions such as nuclear energy as they don’t match their agenda for changing society.'
Well, actually this particular loon's plan is something along the lines of the following.
It’s less expensive than taxing the white middle class into oblivion, which is the only solution you global warning loons can seem to come up with.
Well, actually this particular loon’s plan is something along the lines of the following.
1. Start moving freight back onto trains, which are more energy efficient than trucks anyway.
2. Start electrifying the trains, because…
3. Most electricity is going to start being generated with nuclear power plants.
Not bad ideas, but given the way China and India are pumping out greenhouse gases, not sufficient.
You might be interested in Quico Toro’s posts about CO2 sequestration.
https://www.onepercentbrighter.com/p/are-real-climate-solution-just-too
To be sure: the rest of the world is a problem.
Not bad ideas, but given the way China and India are pumping out greenhouse gases, not sufficient.
I haven’t agreed with Steve on everything and I can accept that. I don’t sit around wondering if he is part of a conspiracy. The more likely answer is that someone on the internet disagrees with me and is not a paid agent.
David Cole describes the MAGA mindset the same way.
Dems understood that the key to using abortion for political gain was to not couple it with other issues. Use abortion to get your open-borders guy elected. Don’t tether abortion to open borders. Keep single-issue voters focused on their single issue. Dems get that. In 2022 they didn’t say “if you agree with us on abortion rights, we don’t welcome your vote unless you also agree with us on trannies and police defunding.”
That would’ve been stupid, so of course it’s what rightists do.
MAGA’s all about coupling, bundling. “You want closed borders? You have to buy the Holocaust denial package. It comes complete with the Protocols of Zion app installed, and the shirtless Putin ‘Death to Ukraine’ interactive interface.” We see the MAGA obsession with purity tests in every skirmish that broke out among those loons before Trump was even sworn in.
“Vance doesn’t want to pardon every J6 rioter? He’s against pardoning the ones who assaulted cops? HE’S THE ENEMY! THE ENEMY, I DECLARE! Vanquish him; the man is Satan himself.”
I’d heard that Cole went off the deep end. The above substantiates that claim.Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
MAGA’s all about coupling, bundling. “You want closed borders? You have to buy the Holocaust denial package.
I live in MAGA country. This bears no relationship to anything I have heard around here.Replies: @AKAHorace
'MAGA’s all about coupling, bundling. “You want closed borders? You have to buy the Holocaust denial package...'
Cole is wrong, of course. Dems did (and do) enthusiastically go all in on trannies, BLM, and open borders, including the top-level candidates for national office (Biden, Harris). Both parties are now 'extreme' package deals (as seen from the opposition).
Dems understood that the key to using abortion for political gain was to not couple it with other issues. Use abortion to get your open-borders guy elected. Don’t tether abortion to open borders. Keep single-issue voters focused on their single issue. Dems get that. In 2022 they didn’t say “if you agree with us on abortion rights, we don’t welcome your vote unless you also agree with us on trannies and police defunding.”
Since he’s Jewish and apparently has TDS, to him living in temporary First World comfortable conditions with a burgeoning Third World underclass is preferable to being under the rule of MAGA Cossacks, or whatever is in his nightmares. Many such cases.Replies: @Achmed E. Newman, @Curle, @John Johnson, @Colin Wright
Kathy Shaidle (bless her soul) always carped "MOW YOUR OWN LAWNS!" But one of the pleasures of being First World is to NOT have to do that, or make your own tacos, or clean your own hotel room. It's climbing up to the 90s here this week. In this heat, if I still had a house, I damn well wouldn't wanna "mow my own lawn."
Trump received three hundred sixty thousand dollars from the pharm companies in the 2020 campaign. Biden received even more, nine hundred seventy thousand dollars. Biden went even further than just endorsing the vaccine. He tried to mandate it for large segments of the population.
I can imagine making the argument that the US govt class and medical establishment was bribed or intimidated by Big Pharma although the total amount of money that you mention is pretty trivial compared to what Big Pharma was doing what you claim it did. But most govts around the world adopted vaccines. I cannot disprove what you are claiming, but is it likely that so many govts around the world were all bought out by Big Pharma ?
This is not to say that there was not overreach and that a lot of what was done disgusts me. Worst case was the statement by 100s of “Experts” that Black Lives Matter demonstrations were a Public Health necessity.
I am going to be my wishywashy, evenhanded and social democratic self in responding to you John Johnson.
This site attracts the right wing equivalent of woke social justice warriors who tear each other apart for microaggressions.
One of the best descriptions I have seen of the problem.
Unz is a social experiment that unfortunately fails for most of the posters.
Oddly enough posters seem to have become more polite to each other now that Sailer has gone. This place has become more of a community that listens to each others life stories (ref Germ Theory). As I suspect many do not have great social lives away from the keyboard, this is a positive development.
“We need to block your opinion for a better tomorrow. The view you are espousing may indeed have a basis in reality but it isn’t good for the public as it will only encourage the destructive opposition.”
– Mainstream liberals, conservatives and around 2/3rds of Unz posters
Well, mainstream liberals and conservatives have control of much of the global media, civil services and governments. We should have some empathy for the 2/3 of Unz posters who have to content themselves with an iron grip on this comment thread.
If you’re agreeing with Pajeet Johnson then you should probably take a step back an reassess. Him or her or it (and you, FTM) suggesting people here have a hard time with people disagreeing is laugh out loud funny.
Pajeet Johnson is one of the several gaslighting tools who brings the lockstep mainstream approved narrative to an alternative viewpoint webzine and then cries like a bitch because people with more intelligence in their clipped fingernails laugh him out of the call center.
A comments section should not be a team sport. Agree or disagree with people depending on the post, there is no point in going back through the history of everything that they have said, particularly in my case when I have a hard time remembering who most of you are.
Also, posts in lockstep with any particular position are not worth reading, whether supporting or opposing the mainstream. The mainstream is wrong about a lot, but not about everything. That is what I like about Sailer, he was not consistent either way.
Uh,, whaaaaaaaaaat? He is absolutely NOT against the US interfering with Ukraine politics, as it has been doing for 11 plus years. He is against Russia finally… finally, after a decade of provocation from the neocon US State Dept, stepping in to defend not only itself from a hostile and encroaching NATO blob
He was dead against western interference that started the war, but does not like the president that Russia set by invading Ukraine. This has been his opinion for some time. He was also pretty even handed about the behaviour of Russian troops in Ukraine and warned about Ukrainian and Georgain over aggresiveness.
Excellent typo, bro!
He was dead against western interference that started the war, but does not like the president that Russia set by invading Ukraine.
Not sure why “the crowds” of Unz have such a hard time with the possibility of someone disagreeing with.
Would post agree if I could. Sailer’s views are pretty close to most commenters here compared to the mainstream media. He is against America interfering in Ukraine’s politics, thought that COVID restrictions on outdoor activity were wrong and that American Jews should be more grateful to the US rather than continually complaining about racism. This site attracts the right wing equivalent of woke social justice warriors who tear each other apart for microaggressions.
listen to women, because I love them and I can’t help it. I am pretty sure this is normal. I hope there is at least one woman out there reading this.
Get real, this is Unz.
That wasn't the rationale for the war at the time -- as people keep tirelessly pointing out.I won't even bother to go through it again. Suffice it to say that at the time, the war was about preserving/restoring the Union.Well, that might have been convincing at the time -- and I can see the argument. But it's not so convincing now. Would we agree that Great Britain should have refused Ireland independence? That Sweden should have crushed the Norwegians with fire and sword in 1905? That Stalin was quite right to set about recovering Finland in 1939?Nope -- we take a more nuanced view about national sovereignty these days. Hell, the Ukraine is the good guy now, aren't they? They wanna be independent -- so they can be.But back to the Civil War. What we want that war to be about was freeing the slaves -- them poor black folks. So we make it about that. Never mind the truth. We need it to be a fine moral crusade, with a good guy and a bad guy -- by our lights.People always do this. They don't look at the past as it was. They remake it to fit their present. The Crusades were about economics. The Sepoy Mutiny was a struggle for Indian independence.A good example of this is change in how the quintessential bad man -- Hitler -- is vilified. Who he actually was is secondary. He is portrayed as whatever is undesirable in the eyes of his critics. At the time, and immediately after the war, he was above all plebian. He was a house painter.But that shortly ceased to be a bad thing. So he became a sexual deviant: every imaginable vice was ascribed to that really rather puritanical fellow back around 1960-65.That actually got reversed. By 2000 or so, sexual deviance was in -- and so Hitler was abused for persecuting sexual deviants. The horror of it all but ranked with the Jews.But the point, to reiterate, is that we don't look at the past. We imagine the past to have been whatever we would prefer it to be. Hitler becomes whatever current fashion says is most loathesome. Dark Age Britain: screw the reality. Let's think it was King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table. It's the past we want there to have been.The truth of the matter becomes entirely secondary.Replies: @Corvinus, @AKAHorace
Thankfully, that issue was settled, albeit with much bloodshed in the Civil War. I imagine you, unlike Curle, find the “peculiar institution” to be malignant and cruel, and therefore it was necessary to permanently remove it.
I would just post agree if I could but I don’t comment often enough to do this.
Excellent point about history, although I don’t know or care enough about the American civil war to have an opinion about this.
The more obsessed people become the more that they make all of history an example of what ever obsesses them. Tuchmans the March of Folly (obsessed with Vietnam) is one case; recent studies which show that the Roman Empire collapsed because they would not allow enough barbarian immigrants another.
But at alt-right you will get called a Jew for making such unwanted observations. Most posters would prefer Scott Ritter’s nightly Hamas fantasy report. Instead of CNN they want Scott Ritter to go PEW PEW PEW and tell us how Hamas is kicking them IDF asses with their Red Dawn tunnels. It’s the same childish reality avoidance that exists in the MSM. I
A problem with commentary on most sites and from many points of view is that everyone writes as if the good guys are winning. No one can admit that the side that they support can lose or that the eviler side can be stronger, better organized or braver.
I don't remember what words my grandmother used. She was old and demented by that time, and I was child. But after reading historical accounts of what did happen in the area at the end of the war, it could have been ugly enough to carry through generations. Civilians were definitely targeted and the men were mostly either dead or away.Replies: @AKAHorace
Euphemism?
New England mother.
There were stories in her family that were passed down from the civil war. Mainly about the shortage of men afterwards and how many of them had become drunks.
Buzz,
It is lovely, but the way that Chat GPT is going these days I would not post anything so personal that could help people find you. Sorry to be a Debbie Downer.
And yes, I envy you if it makes you feel better.
Basically, a long time ago, I sort of prevented a mass shooting from taking place in a crowded restaurant. It’s not like I heroically wrestled some gunman to the ground, what happened was, this psychopath came into a bar with a giant duffel bag full of the most guns I have ever seen in my life, he told me he was going to shoot everyone in the place and then die in a glorious stand-off with the cops, and… I talked him out of it.
Very unlike most people who comment here, who would have:
-asked him if he was going to do this like a typical black shooter (you’re not going to leave a lot of survivors are you ?)
-mocked him for his choice of ammunition.
-pointed out how much he was saving the municipal authorities on police pensions.
-disputed his self diagnosis as psychopath (you seem more like a typical neurotic underachiver/gamma male to me)
-suggested that he was really Jewish.
-protested that they have a right to free speech when the barman tried to interrupt them (so you can’t handle the truth?)
I’d appreciated if someone edit you’re posts, you greasy lush. Your face is getting puffy from all the white wine F yeah! you chug on the daily.
I had a smidgen of curiosity to sense if there is any hostility towards Americans. I am glad to report there is none at all. Their focus of anger is exactly one person.
Thank you, I am glad to hear it as well. We have a few anti american bigots, they are often loud but I hope rare.
Recently returned from a short visit to Canada. Canada, not only is a country but also feels like a nation.
We may have Donald Trump to thank for that. Whatever else he has done he has united a lot of Canadians.
Given that a third of "Canadians" were not born there and have brought their obscure clannish feuds with them, it may take more than pissing everyone off to unite them permanently.Replies: @Ralph L, @Corvinus
he has united a lot of Canadians.
That is not by any definition censorship. They wanted to create a new website where only anti-vaxx opinions were allowed. They did not want Ron Unz posting anything less than the anti-vaxx message. That shows a desire for censorship. They want the public to only hear their message. and if you actually tallied up “100” accusations of conspiracy, I think you have too much time on your hands.I don't have to tally it up. It's an easy estimate like guessing that there are more than 100 fish in the sea. You can just search my history and see that I did not imagine constant accusations of being paid. I was accused of being a subversive Jew or paid pharm agent nearly daily during COVID. Sorry if you can't even handle truth of the COVID reactionary force at Unz. It's public record and we can go over it if you would like. Just grow a pair JJ.That's amusing given that I was not part of a group that was calling for a new website and making daily accusations of how dissenting views must be paid by pharmaceutical companies. If you want we can go back and look at the comments of Ron's essay. The reaction was majority negative and there was consistent outrage over him not taking the opinions of the crowds. There were calls for him to stop writing over one f-cking issue. The anti-vaxxers were clearly the sensitive tea ladies that want alt-right to be an echo chamber of gossip. There were also numerous accusations of him being part of a Jewish conspiracy. Same for Steve. Oppose the Alt-right crowds on vaccines = must be part of a conspiracy. That message was given daily. Go ahead and cite a post by Unz on Steve on vaccines where I am wrong. This place absolutely blew up when Ron dared to question the anti-vaxxers. The message was clear which is that you can question liberal orthodoxy but not our precious anti-vaxxers. I think the vaccine skeptics have been largely vindicated and “your local pharmacist” (let us envision a kindly, grey-haired old fella, dispensing wisdom along with doses) has not.I don't see how that would be the case when mass die offs predicted by anti-vaxxers never materalized. Ron was in fact chastised for pointing out that high vaxx Euro countries like Iceland did not have some subsequent year of mass death. The most commonly cited side effect (myocardisis in young men) is extremely rare and was caught by VAERS. That's amusing since the anti-vaxxers told us we can't trust VAERS. It was also quite telling that they didn't recommend the vaccine for older high risk groups while promoting more research on young men. Or perhaps a gender based approach for that age group. They stuck to their message of NO VAX FOR ANYONE which shows lockstep conformity that isn't based in data. Their complete lack of support for nuanced thinking was quite telling. Suggesting that only high risk populations be vaccinated was unacceptable to them. They wanted total conformity.Replies: @AKAHorace, @Achmed E. Newman
There was talk of creating a new website as Unz wasn’t following their will. What they wanted was censorship.
It was also quite telling that they didn’t recommend the vaccine for older high risk groups while promoting more research on young men. Or perhaps a gender based approach for that age group. They stuck to their message of NO VAX FOR ANYONE which shows lockstep conformity that isn’t based in data. Their complete lack of support for nuanced thinking was quite telling
For many opposed to vaccines it was not only no vaxes ever, but no masks and lockdowns at all. Their view was often that the government making any of these three things compulsory was a dictatorship and should be opposed whatever the circumstances. From what I understood, many of them thought that everyone should do their own thing without any orders from above no matter how deadly or infectious the disease.
I agree with the antivaxers in that I think that govts generally overreacted to COVID. But no compulsion ever seems insane. Would these people refuse to wear masks, obey lock downs or get injected to stop the Black Plague ? In principle it seems so, in real life I hope not.
I think both Ron and Steve benefited from Steve’s presence here. I am saddened things ended as they did. Neither Ron nor Steve seems to appreciate what the other contributed at this point.
P.S. Even when I disagree with James B. Shearer I find it hard to characterize him as an idiot or troll. We have plenty of better representatives of those terms here.
That seems about right.
I think both Ron and Steve benefited from Steve’s presence here.
Point well taken.
Even when I disagree with James B. Shearer I find it hard to characterize him as an idiot or troll.
I just don't want to be one.
We have plenty of better representatives of those terms here.
Hi John Johnson (from Wisconsin ?),
You might find the post from Cremieux Recueil interesting. He argues that autism is not increasing but an artifact and also due to false reporting. He does not say that autism does not exist and is not a terrible thing to have in some cases, but that there is little or no increase. Worth reading:
I’m so sick of people misusing the word fascist. Fascism only comes from the axis regions of central Europe. If it’s not bottled in Germany or Italy it’s called sparkling corporatism.
☮️
Which would do what for the US? Now we can give it to them good and hard.Replies: @AKAHorace
we were due for a right wing pro-American govt.
we were due for a right wing pro-American govt.
Which would do what for the US? Now we can give it to them good and hard.
The Tories may not be pro Trump but they are not out to get him. They would negotiate in good faith. They agree with him on many if not all things.
The Liberals under Carney will seize the moment if he is ever weak.
How can a Canadian Liberal govt not be worse for the US than a Canadian Conservative govt ?
I am sorry to tell you this, but your President is crazy.
You’re a fool if you believe this.Replies: @Mr. Anon
I am sorry to tell you this, but your President is crazy.
Fatal error. Many such cases.
The Tories may not be pro Trump
Looks like setting up against Trump could be a winning strategy for some, but very doubtful that applies to anywhere in Europe including especially the UK, we’re in poor shape already so the last thing we need are more tariffs.
Not setting up against Trump was not an option. ‘Trump repeatedly announced that Canada will be a 51st state (including on election day) so many voters picked the more anti Trump Liberals over the Tories who had been ahead.
Replies: @AKAHorace
From The Times
April 28, 2025
BREAKING NEWS
Cole Burston for The New York Times
Mark Carney Wins Full Term as Canada’s Prime Minister on Anti-Trump Platform
The voters’ decision sealed a stunning turnaround for the Liberal Party that just months ago seemed all but certain to lose to the Conservative Party, led by the career politician Pierre Poilievre.
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/04/28/world/canada-election
Carney gave his victory speech a few minutes ago.
Another triumph of Trump diplomacy. Three months ago it looked as if we were due for a right wing pro-American govt.
Which would do what for the US? Now we can give it to them good and hard.Replies: @AKAHorace
we were due for a right wing pro-American govt.
Really? The Canadian "right-wing" is in favor of a US takeover and annexation of Canada? If not, there are no “right wing” Canadians enough to form a government, so your comment is nonsensical.Replies: @James B. Shearer
Three months ago it looked as if we were due for a right wing pro-American govt.
Trump's inaugural address sounded great, but in reality, what has he really accomplished to my benefit (by "my", I mean the 10's of millions of working/middle class white Americans)?How many of his orders have been blocked without strong objection from the White House? All of them? So cynical me rustles up this theory:Trump Team: We can pretend to to care and issue as many "America First" EO's as we want, because we all know some judge somewhere will block most or all of them, and nothing really changes, so we don't ackshually disrupt the status quo, but we put on a good show for the rubes and it's business as UGE-ual!
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/biden-judge-blocks-trumps-order-ending-x-gender-marker-passportsBiden Judge Blocks Trump's Order Ending 'X' Gender Marker On Passports
So it seems to me, if Trump had half the will he pretends to have, he would issue a statement boldly and proudly stating his intent to ignore the judicial ruling, publicly and directly order the applicable subordinates to continue to carry out his Executive Order, and challenge the activist judge by name to do anything about it… every single time it happens.
Look, I don’t like a lot of what Trump has done (I’m Canadian) and I think that you are being unfair to him. If nothing else aren’t you a bit worried about setting a precedent. If he could do this couldn’t a Democratic president who succeeds him do the same ?
That's how Germany wound up with Hitler.
'Look, I don’t like a lot of what Trump has done (I’m Canadian) and I think that you are being unfair to him. If nothing else aren’t you a bit worried about setting a precedent. If he could do this couldn’t a Democratic president who succeeds him do the same ?'
The precedent is already there. Most of the minoritarian coup was rammed through by kritarchy and bureaucracy. A great deal of it--busing, affirmative action, soft-on-crime, bilingualism, gay marriage, immigration, DIE/CRT racialism, everything to do with trannies--against the clear popular will and often in the face of popular votes against it.
Look, I don’t like a lot of what Trump has done (I’m Canadian) and I think that you are being unfair to him. If nothing else aren’t you a bit worried about setting a precedent. If he could do this couldn’t a Democratic president who succeeds him do the same ?
And there are a great many commenters here that like to stroke their own egos and post with shameless arrogance, so taking them down seems like a justifiable balance.
The more the thread becomes about who is stroking their own egos and arrogant the less it is about political or social issues. I also have trouble following the quarrels between posters because I keep forgetting who is who, this is probably the case for most people who read this occasionally. The discussion thread thus becomes about the posters rather than the subject, and drives readers away.
Steve Sailer is someone who many influential people read, even if they don’t admit it. So an intelligent discussion thread with well written posts might end up changing public opinion.
I suppose now that he has left it does not matter as much though.
Mark,
the problem with many of those that comment here is that they are more interested in taking others on the thread down a notch than debating or learning about anything. So you end up with long threads to determine if people have spent the last 10 years being arrogant and wrong, or are being paid by the Israeli govt to comment or are only posting here because they are cowardly losers or …..
Even if you settled any of these questions who would care ?
Ignore those that are rude and just engage with the polite minority. This can be difficult as the natural instinct is to yell back at those who insult you and overlook those who raise important points quietly.
… being ‘threatened’ by a US takeover is silly—if they’re “postnational”, being annexed by the United States should be no big deal for them. (We’ll of course have to purge Canada of non-citizen “newcomers” after annexation. And ‘liberal’ citizens would be strongly encouraged to self-deport.)Similarly, Greenland may or may not be in the cards for actual annexation, but the aggression by Trump against Denmark (nothing personal, kid) is a fascinating test of Europe’s ‘reflex response’—if we wanted to take Greenland by force, what are they (Europe, UK) going to do about it? Can they fight a superpower if they are, like Canada, demographically “postnational” as well? Is “Europe” even real at this point? If not, who cares what they think?Also, domestic deportations. Imagine caring about the foreign ‘students’ getting snatched. Of course, their campus ‘counter-Semitic’ rambunctiousness has been quite entertaining (I love to see golems turn on their hosts), but no American should care if these goofballs get detained and deported.Trump’s overarching message, delivered in deed, to the foreign dregs of the world: Don’t come here. You have limited rights here.Now, if my li’l pep talk still leaves you myopic Eeyores morose, I’ll at least post some cathartic doom boom bangers to rock to as you ruminate. You’re welcome.SHAWDOWHOUSE — “START AGAIN”
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jan/04/the-canada-experiment-is-this-the-worlds-first-postnational-countryBut as well as practical considerations for remaining an immigrant country, Canadians, by and large, are also philosophically predisposed to an openness that others find bewildering, even reckless. The prime minister, Justin Trudeau, articulated this when he told the New York Times Magazine that Canada could be the “first postnational state”. He added: “There is no core identity, no mainstream in Canada.”The remark, made in October 2015, failed to cause a ripple …
… being ‘threatened’ by a US takeover is silly—if they’re “postnational”, being annexed by the United States should be no big deal for them.
It looks as if Trump’s threats have ensured that the Postnationals (AKA Liberals) are ensured another four years in power. Before he started threatening Canada, polls showed the Liberals facing one of their worst defeats in history with the Tories easily getting a majority in Parlement. Now things have reversed and the Liberals are talking about forming an International coalition against the States.
Ed West said it best
If the last few months has seen a vindication of the Great Man Theory of History, in the form of Elon Musk and Donald Trump, it’s also lent support to the Great Madman Theory of History: many historical events are explained by people making inexplicably bad decisions which prove almost like a deus ex machina for opponents.
These freakish strokes of luck are as unsatisfactory an explanation in history as they are in fiction – but it does happen, and maybe it’s happening now. It could be that Trump’s determination to alienate every possible ally will come under this category, and that his reckless behaviour will cause a totally winnable war against Woke (TM) to be lost; already the Canadian Liberals, on course for a heavy defeat, have been saved by Trump’s intervention.
Oh, so the presumed Canadian shift ‘right’ was all shallow and fake. Good to know!
… polls showed the Liberals facing one of their worst defeats in history with the Tories easily getting a majority in Parlement. Now things have reversed …
Horus, it could be Ed West is a bit a of squish. He should be for a MAGA takeover of Canada, given their fickle nature (some truckers and western provinces excluded).
Ed West said it best
Why should “We The People” start selling off “our” land just to keep up with massive, immigration-caused strain on housing? Why should we do it, whatever the reason for high housing prices? It would be like selling your family heirlooms, and cashing in the family fortune principle too, in order to pay the rent for your inlaws who invited all their cousins to come live with them.
Would post agree if the system let me. In Canada, the Conservatives were making the same argument for our housing crisis, selling off federal real estate to build tower blocks because they didn’t have the courage to oppose massive immigration.
This is misleading because the middle strata in Europe mostly have much more available access to affordable healthcare, medications, and public transportation. They also have access to better food in street markets and supermarkets. Also in the USA travelling to work may be a major expense due to lack of transportation and zoning laws that make walking to work almost impossible.So any nominal measure of currency earned and converted into euros has to be weighed against this. You simply cannot measure the standard of living in one country against another by converting average salaries into US dollars. This is the big con that they are trying to sell to you, and you are apparently buying.For example, here in Ecuador you can get metal dental braces to straighten teeth for 25 US dollars a month. The information I am looking at now on a screen says that this costs $3 to $7 thousand dollars in the United States. A Ventolin inhaler for asthma costs $6.82 with free delivery to the house here in Ecuador today at one of the more expensive pharmacy chains. In the United States the same product averages $90 and you may have to pay $200 to a doctor to get a prescription.If you need a medication that comes in injection form, the pharmacist will administer the shot to you for no extra charge. In the USA the pharmacist wouldn't do it and this would probably cost you at least a hundred dollars.People in lower GDP countries figure out all kinds of more efficient and less costly ways of doing things. Most people don't have computer printers in their home for occasional use, they just Whatsapp their document to the local print shop and pick it up later for a few cents per page.As I recall I paid 135 dollars per month for lousy Comcast internet in the United States, which was a monopoly. Here I pay $18 per month for fiber optic into the house (not an introductory offer), and if I move to a different address they will move it for free. I can choose from several internet providers.I bought large brown eggs yesterday at a supermarket. 15 for $1.99. Could have got a lower price per egg for a tray of 30 at the local egg emporium. Americans are being conned into thinking they have a great life, but the fact is that with the internet and modern technologies the whole world has changed and a lot of the world has caught up even as the quality of life in the United States has gradually regressed.Trump is obviously crazy, but even he realizes that the US is looking into the abyss.Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @AKAHorace, @Art Deco
The typical affluent country outside the United States has a per capita product around 25% below ours. The middle strata in this country is more affluent than their European counterparts.
I would agree to this if the webpage let me. Most North Americans do not realise how much better life can be when you are not living in a society where you are forced to pay for a car and private education.
In your last post though you talked about a NATO attack on the US which seemed extremely unlikely to me. There is no way of doing this without starting a world war, which would damage other NATO members far more than the USA.
Getting rid of Trump through the 25th amendment sounds difficult. The issue is not can Trump carry out his duties but how he is doing so. If ever there was a moment for the sort of complicated assassination conspiracy that people like to imagine happened to JFK to be likely, it is now. Trump is more use to the Republicans as a martyr than a leader.
Agree. It is bit below the President’s pay grade to worry about things like this. Every politician has limited political capital, why spend it on things like paper straws and renaming the Gulf of Mexico.
Wikipedia should be treated with caution, but it can be useful for non-controversial topics (e.g. I trust it more for Presidential physical fitness awards than LGBTQ stuff).
And Wikipedia is far better than no evidence. Have you EVER included supporting evidence in one of your comments, Alden?
Though I do appreciate the accounts from your personal experience, there is a time for that and a time for more checkable evidence.
Perhaps you should be more, rather than less, concerned for your own country?Replies: @AKAHorace
. This makes me more, rather than less, concerned for his sanity.
This makes me more, rather than less, concerned for his sanity.
Perhaps you should be more, rather than less, concerned for your own country?
And thank you for your concern for my backward, arctic homeland. You will be happy to know that because of Trump we are finally getting our act together to do something about barriers to interprovincal trade ( e.g. it is easier to import beer from the US than another province). All our major political parties now agree that it is important to improve links with Europe and Asia. rather than depending on ever closer economic ties with the US.
I agree that it is Sad ! that elections there are driven by things Trump says. Also sad that you have an economy that U.S. tariffs can destroy. Maybe you should seek to be a tad less dependent on others?
Trump’s threats to Denmark and Canada have helped the Liberals in Canada
Also, the Chinese are about the only country that has offered to help us with new trade to replace that the new tarrifs destroys.I wouldn't count on China being overly helpful. China considers India a rival, and now that you're rapidly turning into an Indian nation, she will consider you a rival as well and eventually tariff you.Replies: @AKAHorace
Horace, I’m weighing in here now that Snow Mexico has agreed to negotiations with Trump and he’s holding off on tariffing you. Remember when I told you the threats were just a ploy to get you guys to the table and he wasn’t really going to attack you
He seems to have delayed things so that he can concentrate on turning the Gaza strip into a beach resort. This makes me more, rather than less, concerned for his sanity.
Perhaps you should be more, rather than less, concerned for your own country?Replies: @AKAHorace
. This makes me more, rather than less, concerned for his sanity.
I suppose you are permitted to make your choices, regardless of whether they are objective.
But I realized I also wanted to rule out the Hispanics. Not that I have any bias against Hispanics; I don’t. It was simply that if they were Hispanic, I had that much less reason to be confident that they were actually competent. They could very well be incompetent, and still get passed through.Affirmative action forces us to be biased. If a person is from a favored group, it’s that much more likely they’ll be doing a job they’re not in fact capable of doing. You’d have to be off your nut to agree to a wise Hispanic female performing major surgery on you.
‘…I suppose you are permitted to make your choices, regardless of whether they are objective.’
You’re missing my point. I’m agreeing with you that Hispanic medical professionals are potentially just as competent as Asian or white doctors.
Affirmative action, though, means that you no longer have any guarantee of that. You have one set of practitioners, all of whom have to be above a certain cut off, and another set of practitioners, all of whom need only meet a lower, more relaxed cut off. Which group should you choose your practitioner from?
One group has better grades before they went to dental school, but this is not very informative in terms of determining who are better retail dentists ten or fifteen years later in a particular location near where you live.
Affirmative action, though, means that you no longer have any guarantee of that. You have one set of practitioners, all of whom have to be above a certain cut off, and another set of practitioners, all of whom need only meet a lower, more relaxed cut off. Which group should you choose your practitioner from?
No, I've been following the entire time. Its just that I usually ignore the hand-wringers fretting about what Trump "might do". We've spent 8 years listening to it.
The point of my first post was that second term Trump is a very different man than first term Trump because of all that he has been through. Perhaps you got into this thread half way through ?
Meanwhile you, the citizens of America’s Hat, ARE being replaced RIGHT NOW by subcontinentals, yet your concern is that Trump “might” attack Denmark. Enjoy your curry Srinivas.
Trump’s threats to Denmark and Canada have helped the Liberals in Canada, the party that has raised immigration levels and which is very anti-trump. The Liberals are now doing much better in the polls than the Tories who are (or were) Trump neutral.
Also, the Chinese are about the only country that has offered to help us with new trade to replace that the new tarrifs destroys. A win for China.
Sad !
I agree that it is Sad ! that elections there are driven by things Trump says. Also sad that you have an economy that U.S. tariffs can destroy. Maybe you should seek to be a tad less dependent on others?
Trump’s threats to Denmark and Canada have helped the Liberals in Canada
Also, the Chinese are about the only country that has offered to help us with new trade to replace that the new tarrifs destroys.I wouldn't count on China being overly helpful. China considers India a rival, and now that you're rapidly turning into an Indian nation, she will consider you a rival as well and eventually tariff you.Replies: @AKAHorace
Only very slightly related, but of interest to Sailer as he has written about the German origins of hippies in earlier posts.
https://www.pimlicojournal.co.uk/p/the-new-age-and-the-continental-far
Meanwhile you, the citizens of America’s Hat, ARE being replaced RIGHT NOW by subcontinentals, yet your concern is that Trump “might” attack Denmark. Enjoy your curry Srinivas.
Trump’s threats to Denmark and Canada have helped the Liberals in Canada, the party that has raised immigration levels. The Liberals are now doing much better in the polls. Also, the China
is about the only country that has offered to help us with Trumps tarrifs.
Sad !
One remark about the phrase I am tired of hearing: Trump’s victory was overwhelming.
Is this a joke?
Trump, true, showed admirable energy, fighting spirit & his team devised a clever strategy. Kudos.
But this victory is a short-term mirage. He got basically 50%+. This is a success, but not a spectacular victory. You won spectacularly when you had 60-70% of the vote.
And this is impossible due to changed demographics.
So- let’s remain sober.
I am not sure that anyone from a country that has elected a president who says that he will stop the Ukraine war in one day, renamed the Gulf of Mexico and Mt Denali and spends much of his free time making angry tweets should talk about "chest-puffing" being "the way things go down there".Replies: @Achmed E. Newman, @Reg Cæsar
This is posturing. As you say, “standing up” to Los Yanquis helps this guy, probably to stay in power, the way things go down there. It was just a bunch of chest-puffing.
renamed the Gulf of Mexico
TVHIL* that the Germans had already renamed it, annexing the entire Caribbean as well:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Mediterranean_Sea
Besides, “America” is generic for the whole hemisphere, which those in some countries consider a single continent. So this may be an own-goal for the President.
and Mt Denali
Well, it was originally Denali, renamed McKinley, and re-renamed Denali. So Trump re-re-renamed it. Not all shot presidents are equal– “Cape Kennedy” didn’t stick, but McKinley did for decades. Ward Clark, who lives there, says it never took at home:
Not to cast any aspersions on President McKinley, but with all due respect, he was from Ohio and never really had anything to do with Alaska.
Besides, pretty much everyone up here will keep on calling it Denali; that’s what most folks have always called it.Trump’s Renaming Things, So Why Not Go All-Out? Some Suggestions.
*this very hour I learned
. . So, we should trust a guy who was a heroin addict for 14 years?
Not sure what you are saying here. I am not saying that anyone else is necessarily better.
FIFY. You forgot his first term.Replies: @AKAHorace
Give your man some time. He’s had less thantwo210 weeks.
Give your man some time. He’s had less than two 210 weeks
FIFY. You forgot his first term.
The point of my first post was that second term Trump is a very different man than first term Trump because of all that he has been through. Perhaps you got into this thread half way through ?
No, I've been following the entire time. Its just that I usually ignore the hand-wringers fretting about what Trump "might do". We've spent 8 years listening to it.
The point of my first post was that second term Trump is a very different man than first term Trump because of all that he has been through. Perhaps you got into this thread half way through ?
Wuhan lab accident.
Thanks, this is a good point. How difficult would it be to change the law though ? If you had a business that was large and an overwhelming number of your employees were illegal could you be found responsible for not checking more thoroughly ?Replies: @James B. Shearer
As I have repeatedly explained it is simple to employ illegals without violating the law. You ask them if they are legally allowed to work in the US. They say yes and give you a fake ID. You make a copy of the fake ID and file it away. This complies with the law. As a result only lazy and/or dumb employers are in violation of the law.
“…How difficult would it be to change the law though ? ..”
As hard or easy as changing any other law. Probably the easiest change to enact would be to make E-Verify mandatory. I don’t know if this would pass but even a failure would usefully expose people who are just pretending to oppose illegal immigration. Even absent a law making use mandatory the administration could put a lot of pressure on employers who refuse to use it. Start with the biggest and work down. I expect most would give in. Holdouts could be boycotted.
“… If you had a business that was large and an overwhelming number of your employees were illegal could you be found responsible for not checking more thoroughly ?”
Under current law I believe performing the check I described is a so called “safe harbor” which means it is deemed legally sufficient. And checking further is risky as in some cases you can be sued for discrimination.
It’s odd that Trump is spending political capital and energy on topics that his base has no interest in. The status of the Panama canal, the gulf of Mexico and acquisition of Greenland wouldn’t be remotely of interest if Trump hadn’t made them a subject. Is it a smoke screen for his other goals? Trying to figure out Trump seems to akin to ruminations of the old fashioned Kremlin watchers in the Cold War.
Hamas is actually shielding her from ordinary Palestinians.
I read reports that many/most of the atrocities committed on Oct 7th were by Palestinians who crossed over after Hamas entered Israel.
How many has he started so far?Replies: @AKAHorace
So, how many wars do you think this will take ?
So, how many wars do you think this will take ?
How many has he started so far?
Give your man some time. He’s had less than two weeks.
FIFY. You forgot his first term.Replies: @AKAHorace
Give your man some time. He’s had less thantwo210 weeks.
I’m not sure why you would link the article. A great many important so-called conspiracy theories have been subsequently demonstrated to be true. Using flat-earthers as an example is a weak straw man argument.
Thanks for reading it and your polite reply.
The point of the article was that just because someone is well informed it does not mean that they are not a crank. I think that the author picked flat earthers as almost everyone agrees that they are cranks and yet he shows that they can be very well informed about their subject. I posted it because an earlier poster (#3) mentioned that RFK junior knew a lot about medicine.
You are right, many ideas thought to be conspiracy theories or crank theories have later been proved true (e.g. continental drift). However, these are the ones that tend to be remembered by history. Crank theories that are never proved true tend to be forgotten. Fads and fallacies in the Name of Science gives a good, if dated review of them. It also dismisses the idea of no-tillage agriculture, which has now been adopted by many farmers, a crank theory later proved true.
Even if Kennedy is a crank that does not invalidate his challenges to mainstream theories which are promoted by groups with well known bias.
Some of his ideas may be right, for all of them to be so a lot of medical scientists would have to be very wrong and/or corrupt. I tend to disbelieve those who make such broad claims.
Payback for freedom fries, dude.
Of all the lazy & dumb posts that SS has dropped here since he wisely moved over to substack, this is surely the laziest & dumbest.
Did you hear him say this, or did someone tell you he said this?
Threatening Denmark over Greenland seems particularly strange.
Perhaps there will come a day when people will finally grasp that Trump often starts negotiations with an aggressive position, knowing they'll eventually meet in the middle.
if Trump treats it the way he is threatening to it will mean that no US ally will have any confidence in the states.
Aligning with India seems more likely, given that Indians are replacing you, while you wring your hands and fret about Trump.Replies: @AKAHorace
has hinted at Canada realigning itself if this continues.
Perhaps there will come a day when people will finally grasp that Trump often starts negotiations with an aggressive position, knowing they’ll eventually meet in the middle.
So, how many wars do you think this will take ?
How many has he started so far?Replies: @AKAHorace
So, how many wars do you think this will take ?
There are large-scale employers and small-scale employers and individuals who employ illegal aliens.
It should not be too difficult for the government to target any employer that is big enough to have a human resources employee on staff.
How difficult is it to check the authenticity of fake documents?
The big employers who are employing illegal aliens know exactly what they are doing and it is profitable for them because it costs them less than it would to hire local workers.
I know that some of the types of work are undesirable, but if you pay enough they will come.
When I was a teenager I spent the summers working on farms harvesting crops. I am sure that states could arrange their academic schedules so that students can be hired for harvesting that is not mechanized.
It should become obvious enough to employers that they have illegal workers when they send in W-2s to the IRS.
A lot of the smaller employees of illegal aliens are themselves immigrants or family members.
I guess Soon-Shiong is not as smart as some guy whose only real job was a few years working as a marketing researcher in the Midwest.
'Los Angeles Times' Owner: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. "Knows More About The Science Than Most Doctors"
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2025/01/14/los_angeles_times_owner_robert_f_kennedy_jr_knows_more_about_the_science_than_most_doctors.html
Just because RFK is well-informed does not mean he is not a crank. The post below discusses this better than I can:
https://benthams.substack.com/p/conspiracy-theorists-arent-ignorant-2fc
I guess Soon-Shiong is not as smart as some guy whose only real job was a few years working as a marketing researcher in the Midwest.
'Los Angeles Times' Owner: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. "Knows More About The Science Than Most Doctors"
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2025/01/14/los_angeles_times_owner_robert_f_kennedy_jr_knows_more_about_the_science_than_most_doctors.html
Just because RFK is well informed does not mean he is not a crank. The post below discusses this better than I can:
https://benthams.substack.com/p/conspiracy-theorists-arent-ignorant-2fc
As I have repeatedly explained it is simple to employ illegals without violating the law. You ask them if they are legally allowed to work in the US. They say yes and give you a fake ID. You make a copy of the fake ID and file it away. This complies with the law. As a result only lazy and/or dumb employers are in violation of the law.
Thanks, this is a good point. How difficult would it be to change the law though ? If you had a business that was large and an overwhelming number of your employees were illegal could you be found responsible for not checking more thoroughly ?
One possibility is that Trump himself has become a crackpot. He has done a lot of good but some of his recent decisions are completely unhinged.
Threatening Denmark over Greenland seems particularly strange. Denmark has been a good ally of the US, if Trump treats it the way he is threatening to it will mean that no US ally will have any confidence in the states. The same can be said for the potential trade war with Canada. Stephen Harper, a conservative ex prime minister, who is both pro American and as boringly stable as Canadians can be has hinted at Canada realigning itself if this continues. (ok as a Canadian I could be a bit biased here)
Trump has been through a lot over the last 8 years: accusations of being a Russian spy, vicious lawfare in New York and a near death assassination attempt. He has a stronger character than most, few would have got through this as well as he seems to have. But experiences like this do not make you calmer or more stable. They are more likely to accentuate any personality flaws that you already have.
Did you hear him say this, or did someone tell you he said this?
Threatening Denmark over Greenland seems particularly strange.
Perhaps there will come a day when people will finally grasp that Trump often starts negotiations with an aggressive position, knowing they'll eventually meet in the middle.
if Trump treats it the way he is threatening to it will mean that no US ally will have any confidence in the states.
Aligning with India seems more likely, given that Indians are replacing you, while you wring your hands and fret about Trump.Replies: @AKAHorace
has hinted at Canada realigning itself if this continues.
Naturally the Canadian poster's definition of a good ally is whatever the shitlib-Trudeau-Starmer axis has on its wish list. Denmark and Canada are not good allies. Both fail to contribute properly to NATO while at the same time being some of the most egregious escalators of the Ukraine conflict.
Denmark has been a good ally of the US, if Trump treats it the way he is threatening to it will mean that no US ally will have any confidence in the states
Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
RARE EARTHS
Three of Greenland's biggest deposits are located in the southern Gardar province.
Companies seeking to develop rare earth mines are Critical Metals Corp (CRML.O), opens new tab, which bought the Tanbreez deposit, Energy Transition Minerals, whose Kuannersuit project is stalled amid legal disputes, and Neo Performance Materials (NEO.TO), opens new tab.
Rare earth elements are key for permanent magnets used in electric vehicles (EV) and wind turbines.
There has been "sadism" from Trump? LOL. Citation(s) needed...Replies: @AKAHorace
The trouble for Trump may be that he might lose more votes (Latinos and White swing voters) with pointless sadism than he will gain.
There has been “sadism” from Trump? LOL. Citation(s) needed…
Read the post that I was replying to.
Anyway, no matter how humanely mass deportations are carried out there will always be genuine tragic stories, even before the New York Times exaggerates them. It would be much more efficient to crack down on employers rather than illegal immigrants.
I did. HA didn’t mention Trump engaging in current or future “pointless sadism”, only you did. Again, what “pointless sadism” from Trump? Any cites beyond your imagination?
Read the post that I was replying to.
Seems extremely unlikely. But if so, cite them. Surely you can link to a few “tragic stories” if they exist outside of fiction.
Anyway, no matter how humanely mass deportations are carried out there will always be genuine tragic stories
False dichotomy. Obviously it’s more efficient to do both concurrently, to the full extent of the law.
It would be much more efficient to crack down on employers rather than illegal immigrants.
I think I have told you before that Ecuador is on the US dollar and has no immediate plans to hook up with China. But Trump could change all that if he is determined to go to war with the US allies. Ecuador sells its oil on long term contracts to China and gets cars, cell phones and TVs in exchange. I suppose it could flip and join BRICS if it is no longer wanted as an ally by the US.
Also, for the US $ that you’re living on not to go down the toilet.
Poor old Humpty-Trumpty doesn’t even understand the difference between the EU and BRICS, judging by his recent comments about Spain. One day he wants World War III, the next he wants the US to withdraw from the world and live without coffee, chocolate, potash (essential for agriculture), and electricity.
The list of things that I would prefer not to see include World War III.
Trump is also picking fights with Canada and Denmark. In Canada this has meant that it is less likely that the relatively pro-Trump Tory (Polievre) will win the next election. We in Canada may end up with a Liberal/NDP coalition instead. Denmark is (was ?) pro American compared to most western European countries and one of the few that are based on the question of immigration. They lost 50 dead in Iraq and Afghanistan (the equivalent of the U.S. losing 2 800 adjusted for population).
This was all before Trump was inaugurated. At this rate World War III is not out of the question.
But after canvassing consumers, the exterminator companies discovered that a fair number of housewives find the traps too bland and conceptual. They still prefer the spray poison that allows them the thrill of watching those roaches writhe in what they anthropomorphize as a gruesome and painful death, even though for any one roach that they manage to pick out and zap when they turn on the light, there are plenty others behind the drywall that go on their merry way — i.e. few zapped siblings dying a spectacular death is just another cost of doing business.
The trouble for Trump may be that he might lose more votes (Latinos and White swing voters) with pointless sadism than he will gain. Most people, most of the time are humane. Especially when victims are good looking (at least compared to middle aged/old white American CEOs)
I would suggest more extreme punishments for those who pay illegals under the minimum wage, perhaps reduced sentences for those who pay them well. So it would be dangerous to hire illegals, particularly so if you were undercutting legal workers. Combine this with paying illegals a bit to leave (after all raids/rounding people up/prison flights costs money) and you would have more humane and effective deportations.
There has been "sadism" from Trump? LOL. Citation(s) needed...Replies: @AKAHorace
The trouble for Trump may be that he might lose more votes (Latinos and White swing voters) with pointless sadism than he will gain.
This is posturing. As you say, “standing up” to Los Yanquis helps this guy, probably to stay in power, the way things go down there. It was just a bunch of chest-puffing.
I am not sure that anyone from a country that has elected a president who says that he will stop the Ukraine war in one day, renamed the Gulf of Mexico and Mt Denali and spends much of his free time making angry tweets should talk about “chest-puffing” being “the way things go down there”.
TVHIL* that the Germans had already renamed it, annexing the entire Caribbean as well:
renamed the Gulf of Mexico
Well, it was originally Denali, renamed McKinley, and re-renamed Denali. So Trump re-re-renamed it. Not all shot presidents are equal-- "Cape Kennedy" didn't stick, but McKinley did for decades. Ward Clark, who lives there, says it never took at home:
and Mt Denali
*this very hour I learned
Not to cast any aspersions on President McKinley, but with all due respect, he was from Ohio and never really had anything to do with Alaska.
Besides, pretty much everyone up here will keep on calling it Denali; that's what most folks have always called it.
Trump's Renaming Things, So Why Not Go All-Out? Some Suggestions.
He’s done a whole lot in the way of theatrics, but it won’t do jack until he starts pushing back — I mean, HARD — against the employers as much as he is against the illegals (not that I have any. problem with punishing those who break the law). I don’t mean slap-on-the-wrist fines that get entered into cost-of-doing-business cell on the spreadsheet, whereupon after a few weeks everything at the chicken processing plant and the low-rent motel returns to normal.
A few public arrests of high profile business leaders for knowingly employing illegal aliens would be a cheaper and more humane way of discouraging illegals than mass deportations.
I don't want to be "humane" to invaders. I want them to suffer punishment. As well as deportation afterwards. Also public whippings.
A few public arrests of high profile business leaders for knowingly employing illegal aliens would be a cheaper and more humane way of discouraging illegals than mass deportations.
Unrelated. Kind of sad, but still funny.
There is a slight and interesting exception to this:
Not the biggest or most important, but Canada has a fair amount of brain drain. The US is traditionally where we go, but as the economy worsens, friends have left for Europe or Asia.
A lot of American intellectuals were born in Canada: John Kenneth Galbraith, David Frum, Steven Pinker, Malcolm Gladwell.
I have read several accounts by British and American diplomats who note how unintelligent Canadian politicians are. This may be because Canadians with the ability and interest in politics tend to leave.
Finally, Tom Wolfe briefly spent time in Canada early in his life. The experience was so unpleasant that for the rest of his life he used Canada as a synonym of exile or despair. From the Painted Word.
For about six years now, realistic painters of all sorts, real nineteenth-century types included, with 3-D and all the other old forbidden sweets, have been creeping out of their Stalags, crawl spaces, DP camps, deserter communes, and other places of exile, other Canadas of the soul
How does Montreal look to American voters ?
I mean if Obama can survive having Indonesia as part of his background why not Montreal ? Why would Kamala have to play it down ?
Nothing less than a perfect world will do
This is why you probably won’t win and if you did it would be ugly. Those who have refused to settle for anything less than perfection in politics have been responsible for terrible disasters. To make things work you have to compromise.
The phone video shows those sharpshooters crouched in position and ready to fire in the 42 seconds prior to their shooting the killer just a moment after he fires his multiple rounds. To have reacted that quickly means they were already looking at him and had him in their rifle sites. If they had opened fire just, say, three seconds earlier, he would have got off no rounds. But they are calm and motionless and wait. They do no alert stage security. They do not take the shot.
The police were supposed to be in charge of this building rather than the Secret Service. Could the Secret Service have thought the assassin was police ? If the police were supposed to have someone on the roof this might explain things.
Data, shmata. Don't bother me with facts. What's the use of the internet if you can't gallop off, unfettered by actual information?Replies: @AKAHorace
No, if you look at the paper the strongest evidence for settlement it cores of sediment from lakes that suggest agriculture. From the paper...
Data, shmata. Don’t bother me with facts. What’s the use of the internet if you can’t gallop off, unfettered by actual information?
Sorry Colin, I will try to do better in future.
The Vikings who landed may never have been able to get home -- or been lost at sea trying. That lovely northeast wind that made it so easy to reach the Azores would have proven less useful for the return trip.Indeed, perhaps no Vikings survived the landing at all. The ship could have broken up in the surf and all the human passengers drowned. Some rats washed ashore.Replies: @AKAHorace, @Ben tillman, @ydydy
'What’s unclear is why, having found the Azores, you’d then lose them? They seem pretty nice, with rich volcanic soil:'
The Vikings who landed may never have been able to get home — or been lost at sea trying. That lovely northeast wind that made it so easy to reach the Azores would have proven less useful for the return trip.
Here you might be right.
Indeed, perhaps no Vikings survived the landing at all. The ship could have broken up in the surf and all the human passengers drowned. Some rats washed ashore.
No, if you look at the paper the strongest evidence for settlement it cores of sediment from lakes that suggest agriculture. From the paper :
The researchers suspected they would find signs of human disturbance—pollen from nonnative crops, spores from fungi that grow on livestock dung—dating back to the early 1400s. And they did.
But the researchers were surprised to find these signals extended even further back in time. In a sedimentary layer dating to between 700 C.E. and 850 C.E. taken from Peixinho Lake on the Azores’s Pico Island, the researchers saw a sudden uptick of an organic compound called 5-beta-stigmastanol, which is found in the feces of ruminants such as cows and sheep. They also saw an increase in charcoal particles and a dip in the abundance of native tree pollens, perhaps pointing to humans cutting down and burning trees to clear space for livestock to graze, Raposeiro says.
A similar signal shows up in cores from Caldeirão Lake on the Azores’s Corvo Island dating to about 100 years later. Pollen from a nonnative ryegrass shows up in layers from Pico Island dating to about 1150, and at 1300 on São Miguel Island, also part of the archipelago.
Data, shmata. Don't bother me with facts. What's the use of the internet if you can't gallop off, unfettered by actual information?Replies: @AKAHorace
No, if you look at the paper the strongest evidence for settlement it cores of sediment from lakes that suggest agriculture. From the paper...
They got at least as far as Newfoundland, which may not seem attractive to you, but is a lot more pleasant than Greenland or Iceland. From sagas is appears that the locals may have driven them off as they would have been outnumbered and not had the advantage of firearms.
Walling had shot a young Jewish prisoner in front of the assembled camp for stealing food from the farm fields while marching back to the camp from a work detail but that he did not kill him and he instantly regretted it and saw to it that the teen received medical care (and BTW survived the war). Walling got 25 years hard labor in France at his war crimes trial but got out after 10. Was Walling a Nazi brute for shooting a starving boy for stealing a few potatoes or was he a kind hearted human because he regretted it? Both.
I would tend towards kind-hearted human. The impulse to shoot came from who he was surrounded by, the impulse to save from within him. Perhaps I am sentimental. Thanks for the anecdote.
Damning with faint praise. Sure he was not a seventh degree idiot/demon like some of the Men of Unz, he was only a 6th degree idiot. Moon landing denial, flat eartherism, Shakespeare denial, etc. are all relatively harmless compared to Holocaust denial, which is anything but a harmless belief. There is a reason why Holocaust denial is an actual crime in some countries (and moon landing denial is not a crime anywhere). “Those that fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” - Winston Churchill. In the case of Holocaust denial, not only are they doomed to do so, they are eager to do so.Replies: @Art Deco, @Curle, @Redpill Boomer, @AKAHorace
but nothing to compare to the morons (or demons?) of recent years
“Those that fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” – Winston Churchill. In the case of Holocaust denial, not only are they doomed to do so, they are eager to do so.
In some, perhaps many cases, yes. In others, they are the kind of people who will go against whatever is the popular belief whether it is true or false. There is a subclass of holocaust deniers who would have ended up in a concentration camp had they lived in Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union or Maoist China. There are many more who are happy to denounce the Holocaust because they will go along with whatever is the accepted view who would have been equally safe in Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union or Maoist China (or any other repressive regime).
I don’t think that Holocaust denial should be illegal because of this.
Because the prior Red Terror wouldn’t be repeated and anyway the Jews contribution to that event was never determinative of success or so they say and therefore the Germans should have felt free to kick back and relax knowing that in a hostile world the Jews would never turn on them but would instead be a bastion of loyalty as they were for the Tsars? As they’ve been a bastion of respect and support for the American people, American culture and American’s notions of popular sovereignty?Replies: @AKAHorace
They posed no threat to Germany whatsoever.
Because the prior Red Terror wouldn’t be repeated and anyway the Jews contribution to that event was never determinative of success or so they say and therefore the Germans should have felt free to kick back and relax knowing that in a hostile world the Jews would never turn on them but would instead be a bastion of loyalty as they were for the Tsars?
There were plenty of Jews who fought loyally for Germany in the Great War. Germany was much less anti-semetic than Slavic countries to the east, so this was a rational choice.
At the start of the revolution, while many communists were jews, most jews were not communists. Stalin’s purges had made Soviet communism pretty Russian by 1940. He not only killed Jewish communists but a lot of other ethnic groups, Poles had an especially bad lot.
As well as this, the effort involved in killing millions of Jews was a distraction from fighting on the eastern front that wasted transport, manpower and organization. Killing millions of Jews and Gipsies was as insane as it was evil.
The notion that committing the Holocaust would have been irrational, “insane” even, is cause to be presumptively skeptical about its occurrence.It is one of several good reasons to at least ask questions about it, at least ask for good evidence, for methodology. You’d think everyone would agree that doing so is reasonable
As well as this, the effort involved in killing millions of Jews was a distraction from fighting on the eastern front that wasted transport, manpower and organization. Killing millions of Jews and Gipsies was as insane as it was evil.
That's about as unconvincing as it could be, Steve. Any verifiable sources about those anecdotes made by grandfather's uncles? Or about rich people loaning Shakespeare their books? You seem to think that both are plausible, but no, we can't imagine that anyone might possibly have questioned the authorship from 1623-1823. Maybe you should conduct a reality check on your reality check.
Part of the problem is that most people aren’t good at running reality checks on theories they hear. ...
For more than 200 years after Shakespeare’s death in 1623, nobody argued that he hadn’t authored his own plays. After all, why would they? During this long era, people had, say, grandfathers’ uncles who told fun anecdotes about Shakespeare.
The way the argument goes is that early doubts were expressed surreptitiously, in way to allow for plausible deniability. Censorship was strict during the Elizabethan-Jacobean eras, punishments were severe, and very few people were literate in the first place.
Censorship was strict, but why would the question of Shakespeare’s authorship be a forbidden subject after everyone involved had died ? It does not seem to be a political question. Were the real authors out of favour with the authorities ?
That is a question with a not-so-concise answer. There are at least three major parts. One, the specter of disrepute that could tarnish not just de Vere's family but the British nobility in general. Their vices were not to be discussed openly and he led a scandalous life. The real man behind the name was supposed to be forgotten. "Your name from hence immortal life shall have, Though I, once gone, to all the world must die." (Sonnet LXXXI.) Would these motives eventually dissipate? Sure, but it would take generations.
Censorship was strict, but why would the question of Shakespeare’s authorship be a forbidden subject after everyone involved had died ? It does not seem to be a political question. Were the real authors out of favour with the authorities ?
Are the increases in Serbia and Turkey because people are thinking more like modern test takers ? or because of better nutrition ?
Nutrition certainly helps height: Koreans, Japs and the Chinese all grew by 20cm within a generation once they had decent access to protein. Turns out you only reach the genetic height ceiling for real once you first take care of nutrition.
Are the increases in Serbia and Turkey because people are thinking more like modern test takers ? or because of better nutrition ?
The 4 most important ideas regarding British desires to literally rule the entire globe born of those Victorian ‘think tanks’ of amateurs to gain wide adoption are: eventually get America back serving WASP imperial designs; take Palestine from the Ottoman Empire, remove most or even all the natives and replace them with Jews and thereby have defining control over the entire Middle East
I think that you are seeing a pattern where there was none. The Brits may have promised the Jews a state in Palestine but they were lukewarm about this. They promised things to a lot of groups in the middle east. Unethical, but not part of a plan to replace Arabs with Jews.
After 1945 they tried to limit Jewish immigration into Palestine and got into a guerilla/terrorist (depending on which side you are on) war with Israelis.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_insurgency_in_Mandatory_Palestine
Steve is a chick magnet.
Never thought that I could be jealous of him for social success. I guess that I have to work to acquire that stupid goofy Californian accent of his and women will finally want to talk to me.
.
People just love secret handshakes. And at night I went to the underground punk-rock clubs, with the staff from the shelters, or to these kooky hidden restaurants where they had amazing private-reserve temperanillo. Like I say, people do love secret sh#t.
And then you’ve got your crazy lesbian Dragon-boat Racing, and the crazy lesbian dragon after parties
Well thanks. Like I always say, It always pays to know a lot of different people. It’s like Androcles and the Lion, you never know who is really going to come through for you when you need it most; but usually it will be somebody who you came through for when they needed it. Sermon on the Mount sort of stuff.
When I was a kid I was sort of a withdrawn nerd, terrible at sports and so on. But the other kids on the block said, rather charitably, Hey, he lives on the block too, let him play, even if he sucks! And so I got to know lots of people in the neighborhood, including the local power brokers, who thought it was a scream that a skinny geek who knew Latin was also an alleged stickball star, the math pretty much does itself. They opened doors which in turn opened other doors, and before you know it, there ya go, suddenly you’re lounging at Cafe Pamplona with the prettiest girl in the universe.
It’s a good idea to know a lot of people, but you have to know them from all walks of life to make it work. I am friends with strippers and crack addicts, and also surgeons and studio heads. When I have a dead body in the trunk of my car at 4 am, well figuratively speaking, I sort of have a variety of choices about who to call.
A dinner party with a bunch of upper middle class white Karens and Brads where the subject turns to Trump and everyone sagely nods that Trump is a madman or, literally Hitler. One guy looks a little disillusioned. Then cut to him seeing Biden do some stupid or demented stuff and cut to a wave of invaders coming across the southern border. Then cut to him in the voting booth voting Trump while the voice over says: The ballot is still secret in the United States–only you know who you voted for.
Even better, include the ones loudly denouncing Trump in public voting for him. It would help Trump’s share of the vote and increase progressive paranoia.
Why has racist enmity against whites become so acceptable? There are multiple reasons, but I think the most important driver is that the grand strategy of the Democratic Party has become to exploit the growing diversity of the American electorate to construct a Coalition of the Fringes.
I’ve long considered the beginning of the period of mask-off, anti-white animus to be launched by Susan Sontag 1967’s quote of the white race being the cancer of human history. Of course, she was just articulating what was already bubbling underneath. And of course this was all happening in an essentially all-white populace. I.e., seems like explaining anti-white racism in terms of needing to glue together a coalition of the fringes (which is thanks only to Hart-Celler, itself a manifestation of thinly cloaked anti-white animus) is a case of attaching the cart to the front of the horse, no?
I.e., it’s long been acceptable to those in power and their sycophants; we’re now just at a point where there aren’t enough cognizant whites left to give the anti-whites any reason to worry about a popular uprising anymore.
Why has racist enmity against whites become so acceptable? There are multiple reasons, but I think the most important driver is that the grand strategy of the Democratic Party has become to exploit the growing diversity of the American electorate to construct a Coalition of the Fringes. The less you demographically resemble George Washington, Ben Franklin, or John Adams, the more likely you are to vote Democratic.
Except. this is happening all across the West, not just in the United States. I think you need a larger explanation here.
Also, a lonely and unimportant Crusade of my own, could you help fight against the overuse of the word multiple when there are so many better words ? several, many, a few.
That was a spectacularly English remark
Er, no. An Englishman would have said that he was a great American-football player. George Best was a great football player.
Spectacularly mid 20th century English remark. As in restrained. We could do with a bit more of that on Unz.
All the best.
People just love secret handshakes. And at night I went to the underground punk-rock clubs, with the staff from the shelters, or to these kooky hidden restaurants where they had amazing private-reserve temperanillo. Like I say, people do love secret sh#t.
And then you’ve got your crazy lesbian Dragon-boat Racing, and the crazy lesbian dragon after parties.
Sounds like your social life is a lot better than mine. All the best.
Great football player, but a somewhat flawed character.
That was a spectacularly English remark.
If you are smart you realize that expressing progressive opinions is the way to get ahead in modern society. It is like learning proper etiquette in an earlier era.
You like Steve because he helps your team. I get it. But if Steve turned against your team, you’d turn against him. You have a team. I have a team. Steve feels that he’s above joining a team. He’s wrong.
You know in advance what people who have team will say.
Steve is worth reading because he does not have a team and so calls each issue as he sees it and does not comment when he has nothing useful to say.