[go: up one dir, main page]

The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Alastair Crooke Ambrose Kane Anatoly Karlin Andrew Anglin Andrew Joyce Audacious Epigone C.J. Hopkins E. Michael Jones Eric Margolis Eric Striker Fred Reed Gilad Atzmon Gregory Hood Guillaume Durocher Hua Bin Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir ISteve Community James Kirkpatrick James Thompson Jared Taylor John Derbyshire Jonathan Cook Jung-Freud Karlin Community Kevin Barrett Kevin MacDonald Larry Romanoff Laurent Guyénot Linh Dinh Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Patrick Lawrence Paul Craig Roberts Paul Kersey Pepe Escobar Peter Frost Philip Giraldi Razib Khan Ron Unz Steve Sailer The Saker Tobias Langdon A. Graham A. J. Smuskiewicz A Southerner Academic Research Group UK Staff Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Agha Hussain Ahmad Al Khaled Ahmet Öncü Al X Griz Alain De Benoist Alan Macleod Albemarle Man Alex Graham Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alexander Jacob Alexander Wolfheze Alfred De Zayas Alfred McCoy Alison Weir Allan Wall Allegra Harpootlian Amalric De Droevig Amr Abozeid Amy Goodman Anand Gopal Anastasia Katz Andre Damon Andre Vltchek Andreas Canetti Andrei Martyanov Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andrew Hamilton Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Napolitano Andrew S. Fischer Andy Kroll Angie Saxon Ann Jones Anna Tolstoyevskaya Anne Wilson Smith Anonymous Anonymous American Anonymous Attorney Anonymous Occidental Anthony Boehm Anthony Bryan Anthony DiMaggio Tony Hall Antiwar Staff Antonius Aquinas Antony C. Black Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor AudaciousEpigone Augustin Goland Austen Layard Ava Muhammad Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Bailey Schwab Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Kissin Barry Lando Barton Cockey Beau Albrecht Belle Chesler Ben Fountain Ben Freeman Ben Sullivan Benjamin Villaroel Bernard M. Smith Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Blake Archer Williams Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Book Boyd D. Cathey Brad Griffin Bradley Moore Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brett Wilkins Brian Dew Brian McGlinchey Brian R. Wright Britannicus Brittany Smith Brooke C.D. Corax C.J. Miller Caitlin Johnstone Cara Marianna Carl Boggs Carl Horowitz Carolyn Yeager Cat McGuire Catherine Crump César Keller César Tort Chalmers Johnson Chanda Chisala Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlie O'Neill Charlottesville Survivor Chase Madar ChatGPT Chauke Stephan Filho Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Chris Woltermann Christian Appy Christophe Dolbeau Christopher DeGroot Christopher Donovan Christopher Harvin Christopher Ketcham Chuck Spinney Civus Non Nequissimus CODOH Editors Coleen Rowley Colin Liddell Cooper Sterling Courtney Alabama Craig Murray Cynthia Chung D.F. Mulder Dahr Jamail Dakota Witness Dan E. Phillips Dan Roodt Dan Sanchez Daniel Barge Daniel McAdams Daniel Moscardi Daniel Vinyard Danny Sjursen Dave Chambers Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Boyajian David Bromwich David Chibo David Chu David Gordon David Haggith David Irving David L. McNaron David Lorimer David M. Zsutty David Martin David North David Skrbina David Stockman David Vine David Walsh David William Pear David Yorkshire Dean Baker Declan Hayes Dennis Dale Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Diego Ramos Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Dmitriy Kalyagin Don Wassall Donald Thoresen Alan Sabrosky Dr. Ejaz Akram Dr. Ridgely Abdul Mu’min Muhammad Dries Van Langenhove E. Frederick Stevens E. Geist Eamonn Fingleton Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Edward Curtin Edward Dutton Egbert Dijkstra Egor Kholmogorov Ehud Shapiro Ekaterina Blinova Elias Akleh Ellen Brown Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Emil Kirkegaard Emilio García Gómez Emma Goldman Enzo Porter Eric Draitser Eric Paulson Eric Peters Eric Rasmusen Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Gant Eugene Girin Eugene Kusmiak Eve Mykytyn F. Douglas Stephenson F. Roger Devlin Fadi Abu Shammalah Fantine Gardinier Federale Fenster Fergus Hodgson Finian Cunningham The First Millennium Revisionist Fordham T. Smith Former Agent Forum Francis Goumain Frank Key Frank Tipler Franklin Lamb Franklin Stahl Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner G.M. Davis Gabriel Black Ganainm Gary Corseri Gary Heavin Gary North Gary Younge Gavin Newsom Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Galloway George Koo George Mackenzie George Szamuely Georgia Hayduke Georgianne Nienaber Gerhard Grasruck Gilbert Cavanaugh Gilbert Doctorow Giles Corey Glen K. Allen Glenn Greenwald A. Beaujean Agnostic Alex B. Amnestic Arcane Asher Bb Bbartlog Ben G Birch Barlow Canton ChairmanK Chrisg Coffee Mug Darth Quixote David David B David Boxenhorn DavidB Diana Dkane DMI Dobeln Duende Dylan Ericlien Fly Gcochran Godless Grady Herrick Jake & Kara Jason Collins Jason Malloy Jason s Jeet Jemima Joel John Emerson John Quiggin JP Kele Kjmtchl Mark Martin Matoko Kusanagi Matt Matt McIntosh Michael Vassar Miko Ml Ole P-ter Piccolino Rosko Schizmatic Scorpius Suman TangoMan The Theresa Thorfinn Thrasymachus Wintz Godfree Roberts Gonzalo Lira Graham Seibert Grant M. Dahl Greg Garros Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Greg Klein Gregg Stanley Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Conte Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Gunnar Alfredsson Gustavo Arellano H.G. Reza Hank Johnson Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Hans Vogel Harri Honkanen Heiner Rindermann Helen Buyniski Henry Cockburn Hewitt E. Moore Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Howe Abbot-Hiss Hubert Collins Hugh Kennedy Hugh McInnish Hugh Moriarty Hugh Perry Hugo Dionísio Hunter DeRensis Hunter Wallace Huntley Haverstock Ian Fantom Ian Proud Ichabod Thornton Igor Shafarevich Ira Chernus Irmin Vinson Ivan Kesić J. Alfred Powell J.B. Clark J.D. Gore J. Ricardo Martins Jacek Szela Jack Antonio Jack Dalton Jack Kerwick Jack Krak Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen Jake Bowyer James Bovard James Carroll James Carson Harrington James Chang James Dunphy James Durso James Edwards James Fulford James Gillespie James Hanna James J. O'Meara James K. Galbraith James Karlsson James Lawrence James Petras James W. Smith Jane Lazarre Jane Weir Janice Kortkamp Janko Vukic Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Cannon Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jayant Bhandari JayMan Jean Bricmont Jean Marois Jean Ranc Jef Costello Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey D. Sachs Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jeremy Kuzmarov Jesse Mossman JHR Writers Jim Daniel Jim Fetzer Jim Goad Jim Kavanagh Jim Mamer Jim Smith JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Atwill Joe Dackman Joe Lauria Joel Davis Joel S. Hirschhorn Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Gorman John Harrison Sims John Helmer John Hill John Huss John J. Mearsheimer John Jackson John Kiriakou John Macdonald John Morgan John Patterson John Leonard John Pilger John Q. Publius John Rand John Reid John Ryan John Scales Avery John Siman John Stauber John T. Kelly John Taylor John Titus John Tremain John V. Walsh John Wear John Williams Jon Else Jon Entine Jonas E. Alexis Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Revusky Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Sawyer Jonathan Schell Jordan Henderson Jordan Steiner Jorge Besada Jose Alberto Nino Joseph Correro Joseph Kay Joseph Kishore Joseph Sobran Josephus Tiberius Josh Neal Joshua Scheer Jeshurun Tsarfat Juan Cole Judith Coburn Julian Bradford Julian Macfarlane K.J. Noh Kacey Gunther Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Karl Haemers Karl Nemmersdorf Karl Thorburn Kees Van Der Pijl Keith Woods Kelley Vlahos Kenn Gividen Kenneth A. Carlson Kenneth Vinther Kerry Bolton Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin DeAnna Kevin Folta Kevin Michael Grace Kevin Rothrock Kevin Sullivan Kevin Zeese Kit Klarenberg Kshama Sawant Lance Welton Larry C. Johnson Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Lawrence Erickson Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Leonard C. Goodman Leonard R. Jaffee Liam Cosgrove Lidia Misnik Lilith Powell Linda Preston Lipton Matthews Liv Heide Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett Louis Farrakhan Lydia Brimelow M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maciej Pieczyński Mahmoud Khalil Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marc Sills Marco De Wit Marcus Alethia Marcus Apostate Marcus Cicero Marcus Devonshire Marcy Winograd Margaret Flowers Margot Metroland Marian Evans Mark Allen Mark Bratchikov-Pogrebisskiy Mark Crispin Miller Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Gullick Mark H. Gaffney Mark Lu Mark O'Brien Mark Perry Mark Weber Marshall Yeats Martin Jay Martin K. O'Toole Martin Lichtmesz Martin Webster Martin Witkerk Mary Phagan-Kean Matt Cockerill Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Battaglioli Matthew Caldwell Matthew Ehret Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max Jones Max North Max Parry Max West Maya Schenwar Merlin Miller Metallicman Michael A. Roberts Michael Averko Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Hoffman Michael Masterson Michael Quinn Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Michael Walker Michelle Ellner Michelle Malkin Miko Peled Mnar Muhawesh Moon Landing Skeptic Morgan Jones Morris V. De Camp Mr. Anti-Humbug Muhammed Abu Murray Polner N. Joseph Potts Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Nathan Cofnas Nathan Doyle Ned Stark Neil Kumar Nelson Rosit Neville Hodgkinson Niall McCrae Nicholas R. Jeelvy Nicholas Stix Nick Griffin Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Nicolás Palacios Navarro Nils Van Der Vegte Noam Chomsky NOI Research Group Nomi Prins Norman Finkelstein Norman Solomon OldMicrobiologist Oliver Boyd-Barrett Oliver Williams Oscar Grau P.J. Collins Pádraic O'Bannon Patrice Greanville Patrick Armstrong Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Patrick Martin Patrick McDermott Patrick Whittle Paul Bennett Paul Cochrane Paul De Rooij Paul Edwards Paul Engler Paul Gottfried Paul Larudee Paul Mitchell Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Paul Souvestre Paul Tripp Pedro De Alvarado Peter Baggins Ph.D. Peter Bradley Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Haenseler Peter Lee Peter Van Buren Philip Kraske Philip Weiss Pierre M. Sprey Pierre Simon Povl H. Riis-Knudsen Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Qasem Soleimani R, Weiler Rachel Marsden Raches Radhika Desai Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ralph Raico Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Ramzy Baroud Randy Shields Raul Diego Ray McGovern Raymond Wolters Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Reginald De Chantillon Rémi Tremblay Rev. Matthew Littlefield Ricardo Duchesne Richard Cook Richard Falk Richard Faussette Richard Foley Richard Galustian Richard Houck Richard Hugus Richard Knight Richard Krushnic Richard McCulloch Richard Parker Richard Silverstein Richard Solomon Rick Shenkman Rick Sterling Rita Rozhkova Rob Crease Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Debrus Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Fisk Robert Hampton Robert Henderson Robert Inlakesh Robert LaFlamme Robert Lindsay Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Stark Robert Stevens Robert Trivers Robert Wallace Robert Weissberg Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Rolo Slavskiy Romana Rubeo Romanized Visigoth Ron Paul Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning Rose Pinochet RT Staff Ruuben Kaalep Ryan Andrews Ryan Dawson Sabri Öncü Salim Mansur Sam Dickson Sam Francis Sam Husseini Samuel Sequeira Sayed Hasan Scot Olmstead Scott Howard Scott Locklin Scott Ritter Seaghan Breathnach Servando Gonzalez Sharmine Narwani Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Sidney James Sietze Bosman Sigurd Kristensen Sinclair Jenkins Southfront Editor Spencer Davenport Spencer J. Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen F. Cohen Stephen J. Rossi Stephen J. Sniegoski Stephen Paul Foster Sterling Anderson Steve Fraser Steve Keen Steve Penfield Steven Farron Steven Starr Steven Yates Subhankar Banerjee Susan Southard Sybil Fares Sydney Schanberg Talia Mullin Tanya Golash-Boza Taxi Taylor McClain Taylor Young Ted O'Keefe Ted Rall The Crew The Zman Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas A. Fudge Thomas Anderson Thomas Hales Thomas Dalton Thomas Ertl Thomas Frank Thomas Hales Thomas Jackson Thomas O. Meehan Thomas Steuben Thomas Zaja Thorsten J. Pattberg Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Timothy Vorgenss Timur Fomenko Tingba Muhammad Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Engelhardt Tom Mysiewicz Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Torin Murphy Tracy Rosenberg Travis LeBlanc Trevor Lynch Vernon Thorpe Virginia Dare Vito Klein Vladimir Brovkin Vladimir Putin Vladislav Krasnov Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walt King Walter E. Block Warren Balogh Washington Watcher Washington Watcher II Wayne Allensworth Wei Ling Chua Wesley Muhammad White Man Faculty Whitney Webb Wilhelm Kriessmann Wilhem Ivorsson Will Jones Will Offensicht William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Wyatt Peterson Wyatt Reed Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen Yaroslav Podvolotskiy Yvonne Lorenzo Zhores Medvedev
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2020 Election Academia American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Black Crime Black Lives Matter Blacks Britain Censorship China China/America Conspiracy Theories Covid Culture/Society Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Gaza Genocide Hamas History Holocaust Ideology Immigration IQ Iran Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Joe Biden NATO Nazi Germany Neocons Open Thread Political Correctness Race/Ethnicity Russia Science Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 汪精衛 100% Jussie-free Content 2008 Election 2012 Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2022 Election 2024 Election 23andMe 9/11 Abortion Abraham Lincoln Academy Awards Achievement Gap ACLU Acting White Adam Schiff Addiction ADL Admin Administration Admixture Adolf Hitler Advertising AfD Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Age Age Of Malthusian Industrialism Agriculture AI AIPAC Air Force Aircraft Carriers Airlines Airports Al Jazeera Al Qaeda Alain Soral Alan Clemmons Alan Dershowitz Albania Albert Einstein Albion's Seed Alcohol Alcoholism Alejandro Mayorkas Alex Jones Alexander Dugin Alexander Vindman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Alexei Navalny Algeria Ali Dawabsheh Alison Nathan Alt Right Altruism Amazon Amazon.com America America First American Civil War American Dream American History American Indians American Israel Public Affairs Committee American Jews American Left American Nations American Presidents American Prisons American Renaissance Amerindians Amish Amnesty Amnesty International Amos Hochstein Amy Klobuchar Anarchism Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Greece Ancient Rome Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Bacevich Andrew Yang Anglo-America Anglo-imperialism Anglo-Saxons Anglos Anglosphere Angola Animal IQ Animals Ann Coulter Anne Frank Anthony Blinken Anthony Fauci Anthrax Anthropology Anti-Defamation League Anti-Gentilism Anti-Semites Anti-Vaccination Anti-Vaxx Anti-white Animus Antifa Antifeminism Antiquity Antiracism Antisemitism Antisemitism Awareness Act Antisocial Behavior Antizionism Antony Blinken Apartheid Apartheid Israel Apollo's Ascent Appalachia Apple Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaeogenetics Archaeology Architecture Arctic Arctic Sea Ice Melting Argentina Ariel Sharon Armageddon War Armenia Armenian Genocide Army Arnold Schwarzenegger Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Lichte Artificial Intelligence Arts/Letters Aryan Invasion Theory Aryans Aryeh Lightstone Ashkenazi Intelligence Ashkenazi Jews Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians Assassination Assassinations Assimilation Atheism Atlanta AUMF Auschwitz Austin Metcalf Australia Australian Aboriginals Automation Avril Haines Ayn Rand Azerbaijan Azov Brigade Babes And Hunks Baby Gap Balfour Declaration Balkans Balochistan Baltics Baltimore Riots Banjamin Netanyahu Banking Industry Banking System Banks #BanTheADL Barack Obama Baseball Statistics Bashar Al-Assad Basketball BBC BDS BDS Movement Beauty Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Belarus Belgium Belgrade Embassy Bombing Ben Cardin Ben Rhodes Ben Shapiro Ben Stiller Benny Gantz Bernard Henri-Levy Bernie Sanders Betar US Betsy DeVos Betty McCollum Bezalel Smotrich Bezalel Yoel Smotrich Biden BigPost Bilateral Relations Bilingual Education Bill Clinton Bill De Blasio Bill Gates Bill Kristol Bill Maher Bill Of Rights Billionaires Billy Graham Bioethics Biology Bioweapons Birmingham Birth Rate Bitcoin Black Community Black History Month Black Muslims Black People Black Slavery BlackLivesMatter Blackmail Blake Masters Blank Slatism BLM Blog Blogging Blogosphere Blond Hair Blood Libel Blue Eyes Boasian Anthropology Boeing Boers Bolshevik Revolution Bolshevik Russia Bolshevism Books Boomers Border Wall Boris Johnson Bosnia Boycott Divest And Sanction Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Bret Stephens Bretton Woods Brexit Brezhnev Bri Brian Mast BRICs British Empire British Labour Party British Politics Buddhism Build The Wall Bulldog Bush Business BYD Byzantine Caitlin Johnstone California Californication Camp Of The Saints Canada Canary Mission Cancer Candace Owens Capitalism Carlos Slim Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Cars Carthaginians Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Cats Caucasus CCP CDC Ceasefire Census Central Asia Central Intelligence Agency Chabad Chanda Chisala Chaos And Order Charles De Gaulle Charles Kushner Charles Lindbergh Charles Manson Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charlie Hebdo Charlie Kirk Charlottesville ChatGPT Checheniest Chechen Of Them All Chechens Chechnya Chetty Chicago Chicagoization Chicken Hut Child Abuse Children Chile China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese IQ Chinese Language Christian Zionism Christian Zionists Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Christopher Wray Chuck Schumer CIA Cinema Citizenship Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil Rights Movement Civil War Civilization Clannishness Clash Of Civilizations Class Classical Antiquity Classical History Classical Music Clayton County Climate Change Clint Eastwood Clintons Coal Coalition Of The Fringes Coen Brothers Cognitive Elitism Cognitive Science Cold Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard College Admission College Football Colombia Colonialism Color Revolution Columbia University Columbus Comic Books Communism Computers Confederacy Confederate Flag Confucianism Congress Conquistador-American Conservatism Conservative Movement Conservatives Conspiracy Theory Constantinople Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumerism Controversial Book Convergence Core Article Corona Corporatism Corruption COTW Counterpunch Country Music Cousin Marriage Cover Story COVID-19 Craig Murray Creationism Crime Crimea Crimean War Crispr Critical Race Theory Cruise Missiles Crusades Crying Among The Farmland Crypto Cryptocurrency Ctrl-Left Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckery Cuckservative CUFI Cuisine Cultural Marxism Cultural Revolution Culture Culture War Czars Czech Republic DACA Daily Data Dump Dallas Shooting Damnatio Memoriae Dan Bilzarian Danny Danon Daren Acemoglu Darwinism Darya Dugina Data Data Analysis Dave Chappelle David Bazelon David Brog David Cole David Duke David Friedman David Frum David Irving David Lynch David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Of The West Deborah Lipstadt Debt Debt Jubilee Decadence Deep State DeepSeek Deficits Degeneracy Democracy Democratic Party Demograhics Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denmark Dennis Ross Department Of Education Department Of Homeland Security Deplatforming Deportation Abyss Deportations Derek Chauvin Detroit Development Dick Cheney Diet Digital Yuan Dinesh D'Souza Discrimination Disease Disinformation Disney Disparate Impact Disraeli Dissent Dissidence Diversity Diversity Before Diversity Diversity Pokemon Points Dmitry Medvedev DNA Dogs Dollar Domestic Surveillance Domestic Terrorism Doomsday Clock Dostoevsky Doug Emhoff Doug Feith Dresden Drone War Drones Drug Cartels Drug Laws Drugs Duterte Dysgenic Dystopia E. Michael Jones E. O. Wilson East Asia East Asian Exception East Asians East Turkestan Easter Eastern Europe Ebrahim Raisi Economic Development Economic History Economic Sanctions Economy Edmund Burke Foundation Education Edward Snowden Effective Altruism Effortpost Efraim Zurofff Egor Kholmogorov Egypt El Salvador Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2020 Election Fraud Elections Electric Cars Eli Rosenbaum Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elise Stefanik Elites Elizabeth Holmes Elizabeth Warren Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emmanuel Macron Emmett Till Employment Energy England Enoch Powell Entertainment Environment Environmentalism Epidemiology Equality Erdogan Eretz Israel Eric Zemmour Ernest Hemingway Espionage Espionage Act Estonia Ethics Ethics And Morals Ethiopia Ethnic Cleansing Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity Ethnocentricty EU Eugene Debs Eugenics Eurabia Eurasia Euro Europe European Genetics European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Genetics Evolutionary Psychology Existential Risks Eye Color Face Shape Facebook Faces Fake News False Flag Attack Family Fantasy FARA Farmers Fascism Fast Food FBI FDA FDD Federal Reserve FEMA Feminism Ferguson Ferguson Shooting Fermi Paradox Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates FIFA Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Finland Finn Baiting First Amendment First World War FISA Fitness Flash Mobs Flight From White Floyd Riots 2020 Fluctuarius Argenteus Flynn Effect Food Football For Fun Forecasts Foreign Agents Registration Act Foreign Aid Foreign Policy Fourth Amendment Fox News France Francesca Albanese Frank Salter Frankfurt School Franklin D. Roosevelt Franz Boas Fraud Fred Kagan Free Market Free Speech Free Trade Freedom Of Speech Freedom Freemasons French French Revolution Friedrich Karl Berger Friends Of The Israel Defense Forces Frivolty Frontlash Furkan Dogan Future Futurism G20 Gambling Game Game Of Thrones Gavin McInnes Gavin Newsom Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians Gaza Flotilla GDP Gen Z Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Equality Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Genealogy General Intelligence General Motors Generation Z Generational Gap Genes Genetic Diversity Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genomics Gentrification Geography Geopolitics George Bush George Floyd George Galloway George Patton George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush Georgia Germans Germany Ghislaine Maxwell Gilad Atzmon Gina Peddy Giorgia Meloni Gladwell Glenn Greenwald Global Warming Globalism Globalization Globo-Homo God Gold Golf Gonzalo Lira Google Government Government Debt Government Spending Government Surveillance Government Waste Grant Smith Graphs Great Bifurcation Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Powers Great Replacement Greece Greeks Greenland Greg Cochran Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Greta Thunberg Grooming Group Selection GSS Guardian Guest Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns GWAS Gypsies H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Haiti Hajnal Line Halloween HammerHate Hannibal Procedure Happening Happiness Harvard Harvard University Harvey Weinstein Hassan Nasrallah Hate Crimes Fraud Hoax Hate Hoaxes Hate Speech Hbd Hbd Chick Health Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Hegira Height Hell Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Heredity Heritability Heritage Foundation Hezbollah High Speed Rail Hillary Clinton Hindu Caste System Hindus Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanics Historical Genetics History Of Science Hitler HIV/AIDS Hoax Holland Hollywood Holocaust Denial Holocaust Deniers Homelessness Homicide Homicide Rate Hominin Homomania Homosexuality Hong Kong Houellebecq Housing Houthis Howard Kohr Huawei Huddled Masses Huey Newton Human Achievement Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Evolutionary Genetics Human Evolutionary Genomics Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Rights Human Rights Watch Humor Hungary Hunt For The Great White Defendant Hunter Biden I.F. Stone I.Q. I.Q. Genomics #IBelieveInHavenMonahan ICC Icj Ideas Identity Ideology And Worldview IDF Idiocracy Igbo Ilan Pappe Ilhan Omar Illegal Immigration Ilyushin IMF Impeachment Imperialism Inbreeding Income Income Tax India Indian Indian IQ Indians Individualism Indo-Europeans Indonesia Inequality Inflation Intelligence Intelligence Agencies International International Comparisons International Court Of Justice International Criminal Court International Relations Internet Interracial Marriage Interracism Intersectionality Intifada Intra-Racism Intraracism Invade Invite In Hock Invade The World Invite The World Iosef Stalin Iosif Stalin Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish Is Love Colorblind Isaac Herzog ISIS Islam Islamic Jihad Islamic State Islamism Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Bonds Israel Defense Force Israel Defense Forces Israel Separation Wall Israeli Occupation IT Italy Itamar Ben-Gvir It's Okay To Be White Ivanka Ivy League J Street Jack Welch Jacky Rosen Jair Bolsonaro Jake Sullivan Jake Tapper Jamal Khashoggi James Angleton James B. Watson James Clapper James Comey James Forrestal James Jeffrey James Mattis James Watson James Zogby Janet Yellen Janice Yellen Japan Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Greenblatt JASTA Javier Milei JCPOA JD Vance Jeb Bush Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Goldberg Jeffrey Sachs Jen Psaki Jennifer Rubin Jens Stoltenberg Jeremy Corbyn Jerry Seinfeld Jerusalem Jerusalem Post Jesus Jesus Christ Jewish Genetics Jewish History Jewish Intellectuals Jewish Power Jewish Power Party Jewish Supremacism JFK Assassination JFK Jr. Jihadis Jill Stein Jimmy Carter Jingoism JINSA Joe Lieberman Joe Rogan John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John F. Kennedy John Hagee John Kirby John Kiriakou John McCain John McLaughlin John Mearsheimer John Paul Joker Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Greenblatt Jonathan Pollard Jordan Peterson Joseph Goebbels Joseph McCarthy Josh Gottheimer Josh Paul Journalism Judaism Judea Judge George Daniels Judicial System Judith Miller Julian Assange Jussie Smollett Justice Justin Trudeau Kaboom Kahanists Kaiser Wilhelm Kamala Harris Kamala On Her Knees Kanye West Karabakh War 2020 Karen Kwiatkowski Karine Jean-Pierre Karmelo Anthony Kash Patel Kashmir Katy Perry Kay Bailey Hutchison Kazakhstan Keir Starmer Kenneth Marcus Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Williamson Khazars Kids Kim Jong Un Kinship Kkk KKKrazy Glue Of The Coalition Of The Fringes Knesset Kompromat Korea Korean War Kosovo Kristi Noem Ku Klux Klan Kubrick Kurds Kushner Foundation Kyle Rittenhouse Kyrie Irving Language Laos Larry Ellison Larry C. Johnson Late Obama Age Collapse Latin America Latinos Laura Loomer Law Lawfare LDNR Lead Poisoning Leahy Amendments Leahy Law Lebanon Lee Kuan Yew Lenin Leo Frank Leo Strauss Let's Talk About My Hair LGBT LGBTI Liberal Opposition Liberal Whites Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libya Lindsey Graham Linguistics Literacy Literature Lithuania Litvinenko Living Standards Liz Cheney Liz Truss Lloyd Austin long-range-missile-defense Longevity Looting Lord Of The Rings Lorde Los Angeles Loudoun County Louis Farrakhan Love And Marriage Low-fat Lukashenko Lula Lynchings Lyndon B Johnson Lyndon Johnson Madeleine Albright Mafia MAGA Magda Goebbels Magnitsky Act Mahmoud Abbas Malaysia Malaysian Airlines MH17 Manufacturing Mao Zedong Maoism Map Marco Rubio Maria Butina Maria Corina Machado Marijuana Marine Le Pen Marjorie Taylor Greene Mark Levin Mark Milley Mark Steyn Mark Warner Market Economy Martin Luther King Martin Scorsese Marvel Marx Marxism Masculinity Mass Immigration Mass Shootings Mate Choice Mathematics Matt Gaetz Max Blumenthal Max Boot Max Weber Maxine Waters Mayans McCain McCain/POW McDonald's Meat Media Media Bias Medicine Medieval Christianity Medieval Russia Mediterranean Diet Medvedev Megan McCain Meghan Markle Mein Obama Mel Gibson Men With Gold Chains Meng Wanzhou Mental Health Mental Illness Meritocracy Merkel Merkel Youth Merkel's Boner Merrick Garland Mexico MH 17 MI-6 Michael Bloomberg Michael Collins PIper Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lind Michael McFaul Michael Moore Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michelle Goldberg Michelle Ma Belle Michelle Obama Microaggressions Middle Ages Middle East Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Johnson Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mike Waltz Mikhael Gorbachev Miles Mathis Militarized Police Military Military Analysis Military Budget Military History Military Spending Military Technology Millennials Milner Group Minimum Wage Minneapolis Minorities Minsk Accords Miriam Adelson Miscegenation Miscellaneous Misdreavus Mishima Missile Defense Mitch McConnell Mitt Romney Mixed-Race MK-Ultra Mohammed Bin Salman Monarchy Mondoweiss Money Mongolia Mongols Monkeypox Monopoly Monotheism Monroe Doctrine Moon Landing Hoax Moon Landings Morality Mormonism Mormons Mortality Mortgage Moscow Mossad Movies Muhammad Multiculturalism Multipolarity Music Muslim Ban Muslims Mussolini NAEP Naftali Bennett Nakba Nancy Pelos Nancy Pelosi Narendra Modi NASA Natanz Nation Of Hate Nation Of Islam National Assessment Of Educational Progress National Debt National Endowment For Democracy National Review National Security Strategy National Socialism National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans Natural Gas Nature Vs. Nurture Navalny Affair Navy Standards Nazis Nazism Neandertals Neanderthals Nehru Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolithic Neoreaction Nesta Webster Netherlands Never Again Education Act New Cold War New Dark Age New Deal New Horizon Foundation New Silk Road New Tes New Testament New World Order New York New York City New York Times New Zealand New Zealand Shooting NFL Nicholas II Nicholas Wade Nick Eberstadt Nick Fuentes Nicolas Maduro Nietzsche Niger Nigeria Nike Nikki Haley NIMBY Nina Jankowicz Noam Chomsky Nobel Peace Prize Nobel Prize Nord Stream Nord Stream Pipelines Nordics Norman Braman Norman Finkelstein North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway Novorossiya NSA NSO Group Nuclear Energy Nuclear Power Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Nuremberg Nutrition Nvidia NYPD Obama Obama Presidency Obamacare Obesity Obituary Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Wall Street October Surprise OFAC Oil Oil Industry OJ Simpson Olav Scholz Old Testament Oliver Stone Olympics Open Borders OpenThread Opinion Poll Opioids Orban Organized Crime Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Orwell Osama Bin Laden OTFI Ottoman Empire Our Soldiers Speak Out Of Africa Model Paganism Pakistan Pakistani Palantir Palestine Palestinians Palin Pam Bondi Panhandling Papacy Paper Review Parasite Burden Parenting Parenting Paris Attacks Partly Inbred Extended Family Pat Buchanan Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Craig Roberts Paul Findley Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Paypal Peak Oil Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Pentagon Personal Genomics Personality Pete Buttgieg Pete Hegseth Peter Frost Peter Thiel Petro Poroshenko Phil Rushton Philadelphia Philippines Philosophy Phoenicians Phyllis Randall Physiognomy Piers Morgan Pigmentation Pigs Piracy PISA Pizzagate POC Ascendancy Podcast Poetry Poland Police Police State Polio Political Correctness Makes You Stupid Political Dissolution Political Economy Politicians Politics Polling Pollution Polygamy Polygyny Pope Francis Population Population Genetics Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Porn Pornography Portland Portugal Portuguese Post-Apocalypse Postindustrialism Poverty Power Pramila Jayapal PRC Prediction Prescription Drugs President Joe Biden Presidential Race '08 Presidential Race '12 Presidential Race '16 Presidential Race '20 Prince Andrew Prince Harry Princeton University Priti Patel Privatization Progressives Propaganda Prostitution protest Protestantism Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion Proud Boys Psychology Psychometrics Psychopathy Public Health Public Schools Puerto Rico Puritans Putin Putin Derangement Syndrome QAnon Qasem Soleimani Qassem Soleimani Qatar Quantitative Genetics Quiet Skies R2P Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race/IQ Race-Ism Race Riots Rachel Corrie Racial Purism Racial Reality Racialism Racism Rafah Raj Shah Rand Paul Randy Fine Rape Rare Earths Rashida Tlaib Rasputin Rationality Ray McGovern Raymond Chandler Razib Khan Real Estate RealWorld Recep Tayyip Erdogan Reconstruction Red Sea Refugee Crisis Religion Religion And Philosophy Rentier Reparations Reprint Republican Party Republicans Review Revisionism Rex Tillerson RFK Assassination Ricci Richard Dawkins Richard Goldberg Richard Grenell Richard Haas Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Rightwing Cinema Riots R/k Theory RMAX Robert A. Heinlein Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Ford Robert Kagan Robert Kraft Robert Maxwell Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert Reich Robots Rock Music Roe Vs. Wade Roger Waters Rolling Stone Roman Empire Romania Romans Romanticism Rome Ron DeSantis Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rotherham Rothschilds Roy Cohn RT International Rudy Giuliani Rush Limbaugh Russiagate Russian Demography Russian Elections 2018 Russian History Russian Media Russian Military Russian Nationalism Russian Occupation Government Russian Orthodox Church Russian Reaction Russians Russophobes Russophobia Rwanda Ryan Dawson Sabrina Rubin Erdely Sacha Baron Cohen Sacklers Sadism Sailer Strategy Sailer's First Law Of Female Journalism Saint Peter Tear Down This Gate! Saint-Petersburg Salman Rushie Salt Sam Altman Sam Bankman-Fried Sam Francis Samantha Power Samson Option San Bernadino Massacre Sandy Hook Sapir-Whorf SAT Satan Satanic Age Satanism Saudi Arabia Scandal Schizophrenia Science Fiction Scooter Libby Scotland Scott Bessent Scott Ritter Scrabble Secession Self Determination Self Indulgence Semites Serbia Sergei Lavrov Sergei Skripal Sergey Glazyev Seth Rich Sex Sex Differences Sexism Sexual Harassment Sexual Selection Sexuality Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shakespeare Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shireen Abu Akleh Shmuley Boteach Shoah Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shulamit Aloni Shurat HaDin Sigal Mandelker Sigar Pearl Mandelker Sigmund Freud Silicon Valley Singapore Sinotriumph Six Day War Sixties SJWs Skin Color Slavery Slavery Reparations Slavs Smart Fraction Social Justice Warriors Social Media Social Science Socialism Society Sociobiology Sociology Sodium Solzhenitsyn Somalia Sotomayor South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea Southeast Asia Soviet History Soviet Union Sovok Space Space Exploration Space Program Spain Spanish Spanish River High School SPLC Sport Sports Srebrenica Stabby Somali Staffan Stage Stalinism Standardized Tests Star Trek Star Wars Starvation Comparisons State Department Statistics Statue Of Liberty Steny Hoyer Stephen Cohen Stephen Jay Gould Stereotypes Steroids Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steve Witkoff Steven Pinker Steven Witkoff Strait Of Hormuz Strategic Ambiguity Stuart Levey Stuart Seldowitz Student Debt Stuff White People Like Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subhas Chandra Bose Subprime Mortgage Crisis Suburb Suella Braverman Sugar Suicide Superintelligence Supreme Court Surveillance Susan Glasser Svidomy Sweden Switzerland Symington Amendment Syria Syrian Civil War Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Take Action Taliban Talmud Tariff Tariffs Tatars Taxation Taxes Technical Considerations Technology Ted Cruz Telegram Television Terrorism Terrorists Terry McAuliffe Tesla Testing Testosterone Tests Texas THAAD Thailand The AK The American Conservative The Bell Curve The Bible The Black Autumn The Cathedral The Confederacy The Constitution The Eight Banditos The Family The Free World The Great Awokening The Guardian The Left The Middle East The New York Times The South The States The Zeroth Amendment To The Constitution Theranos Theresa May Third World Thomas Jefferson Thomas Massie Thomas Moorer Thought Crimes Tiananmen Massacre Tibet Tiger Mom TikTok TIMSS Tom Cotton Tom Massie Tom Wolfe Tony Blair Tony Blinken Tony Kleinfeld Too Many White People Torture Trade Trans Fat Trans Fats Transgender Transgenderism Transhumanism Translation Translations Transportation Travel Trayvon Martin Treason Trolling True Redneck Stereotypes Trump Trump Derangement Syndrome Trump Peace Plan Trust Trust Culture Tsarist Russia Tucker Carlson Tulsa Tulsi Gabbard Turkey Turks TWA 800 Twins Twitter Ucla UFOs UK Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unbearable Whiteness Unemployment United Kingdom United Nations United Nations General Assembly United Nations Security Council United States Universal Basic Income UNRWA Urbanization Ursula Von Der Leyen Uruguay US Blacks US Capitol Storming 2021 US Civil War II US Congress US Constitution US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 US State Department USA USAID USS Liberty USSR Uyghurs Uzbekistan Vaccination Vaccines Valdimir Putin Valerie Plame Vdare Venezuela Victor Davis Hanson Victoria Nuland Victorian England Video Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Viktor Orban Viktor Yanukovych Violence Vioxx Virginia Vitamin D Vivek Ramaswamy Vladimir Zelensky Volodymyr Zelensky Vote Fraud Voting Rights Voting Rights Act Vulcan Society Waffen SS Wall Street Walmart Wang Ching Wei Wang Jingwei War War Crimes War Guilt War In Donbass War On Christmas War On Terror War Powers War Powers Act Warhammer Washington DC WASPs Watergate Wealth Wealth Inequality Web Traffic Weight WEIRDO Welfare Wendy Sherman West Bank Western Decline Western European Marriage Pattern Western Hypocrisy Western Media Western Religion Western Revival Westerns White America White Americans White Death White Flight White Guilt White Helmets White Liberals White Man's Burden White Nationalism White Nationalists White People White Privilege White Race White Racialism White Slavery White Supremacy Whiterpeople Whites Whoopi Goldberg Wikileaks Wikipedia Wildfires William Browder William F. Buckley William Kristol William Latson William McGonagle William McRaven Wilmot Robertson WINEP Winston Churchill Woke Capital Women Woodrow Wilson Workers Working Class World Bank World Economic Forum World Health Organization World Population World War G World War H World War Hair World War I World War III World War R World War T WTF WVS WWII Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yahya Sinwar Yair Lapid Yemen Yevgeny Prigozhin Yoav Gallant Yogi Berra's Restaurant Yoram Hazony YouTube Yugoslavia Yuval Noah Harari Zbigniew Brzezinski Zimbabwe Zionism Zionists Zohran Mamdani Zvika Fogel
Nothing found
Filter?
Dumbo
Comments
• My
Comments
6,909 Comments • 624,000 Words •  RSS
(Commenters may request that their archives be hidden by contacting the appropriate blogger)
All Comments
 All Comments
    We took a family trip to Spain and Portugal over the Christmas and New Year holidays for two weeks. This was my first extended stay in Spain since 1997 when I spent a semester as an exchange student at the IESE school in Barcelona. It’s good to be back at the desk at home. My...
  • @Emslander
    @Gbyut


    Sagrada Familia is ugly and a financial boondoggle, a farce.
     
    On that, as a devout Roman Catholic, I agree. Gaudi seems to be mocking the Catholic tradition, not reverencing it.

    Replies: @The Alarmist, @Dumbo

    Well we don’t really know what Gaudi planned as it was only partially completed when he died and he didn’t leave very clear plans. I like some of his civil buildings (basically fancy houses for rich people) but I agree that building a Cathedral is quite different.

    I don’t really like it, it doesn’t give you an impression of grandeur as much as confusion. It looks more like something rising from the ground than a building as ending to Heaven.

    Still, the best parts of the Sagrada Familia are those actually completed in Gaudi’s time. The modern sculptures, towers and de orations look like a mockery of Gaudi, or worse.

    Salvador Dali said back then thai it should have never been completed, just put under a giant glass enclosing.. Perhaps he was right…

    • Thanks: Emslander
    • Replies: @Emslander
    @Dumbo

    Dali always had a pretty good take on things, as weird as he seemed. I didn't know those facts. Thanks.

  • @Miro23

    However, the atmosphere in the churches was not particularly religious. Most visitors seemed to be tourists like us, taking photos, and few pious worshippers were present.

    Secularization seems to have won. Europe now lives in a post-religion era, but I wonder what the replacement is since Christianity has been the source of morality and values for the West.

     

    No doubt that mass Christianity has faded out in Europe but solid minority Christianity remains – at least in Spain. There’s also a difference from (for example) the UK with regard to the standard Jewish leftist guilt control mechanisms of “racism”, “misogyny” and “anti-Semitism”.

    Activists have tried to ramp up the Leyenda Negra (Black Legend) of Spanish colonialism in South and Central America and activate the “racist” guilt trip but it hasn’t worked. People of South American origin don’t see a problem. Those of 25-35 years are now approaching 30% of the Spanish workforce and integrate well. As the Spanish say, the 7.000km that separate Spain and Venezuela are less than the 13km that separate Spain and Morocco.

    Argentinians are ethnically indistinguishable from Spaniards and South American Indians have the employment level of Spaniards (they come to work ). They pay taxes and in fact keep the extensive lower wage sectors of the Spanish economy functioning. That’s to say tourism, agro, construction, healthcare etc. They can typically double the wages they were earning in Colombia or Venezuela + get better schooling and healthcare.

    There’s also the aspect that they want to integrate and have no group identity type political ambitions.

    The real issue in Spain seems to be the “misogyny” guilt trip. It’s true that Spain was until recently a “macho” society (still is at the lower levels) with women now urgently seeking equality in all things. They’re already a majority of university graduates (future professionals taking mens higher paid jobs) and the country has introduced corresponding laws.

    Ley de Igualdad 3/2007 (Law of Equality). Legal obligation to plan for and implement equal numbers of women to men in senior administrative and corporate positions. The Ministerio de Igualdad (Ministry of Equality) enforces it along with what’s come to be known as the “Ley Trans” 4/2023 to enforce LBGT rights – such as the right of any 16+ year old to visit their local Civil Registry and inform them that they have changed their sex (no proof required).

    The problem is the consequential collapse in the Spanish birthrate (currently 1.12 per woman while replacement is 2.10). Educated career women are getting married later or not at all. They’re having children in their 30’s or remaining childless, and they complain of the difficulties of combining work with family life and the impossibility of meeting suitably high status men (are they aware that they have replaced them). Marrying a plumber doesn’t seem to be an option. However, there does seem to be a growing realization that it’s not working with unmarried, childless career women being the principle group of social depressives.

    The Anti-Semitism guilt trip doesn’t work. Most Spaniards go along with the government in condemning the Gaza genocide and supporting Palestinian nationhood and they don’t care about US/Israeli hostility. Holocaust guilt seems to be non-existent and there’s that noticeable gap between Spain and N. European people/psychology. An affinity ranking would probably run something like Argentina, Mexico, Venezuela, Colombia, rest of S. America (excluding Brazil), Portugal, Brazil, Italy, rest of Europe, rest of the world, USA, North Africa. China remains in the “rest of the world” indifferent category.

    Replies: @Dumbo

    Those of 25-35 years are now approaching 30% of the Spanish workforce and integrate well.

    They are not troublemakers like the Arabs or Africans, but nevertheless they change the ethnic composition of the country. Spain looks more and more like Latin America now. How long it will remain distinctly Spain?

    And it’s even worse in the “independentist” regions. Catalans fret about their “identity” but it’s only focused on language. The bulk of the population of Barcelona is formed by Venezuelans, Moroccans, Africans, Pakis, and a few old Catalans dying out.

    Argentinians are ethnically indistinguishable from Spaniards

    Not really. The typical Argentine is half-Spanish, half-Italian, and has a small percentage of Indian blood (which increases the farther you get from Buenos Aires and other central cities, especially towards the Northern provinces).

    The real issue in Spain seems to be the “misogyny” guilt trip. It’s true that Spain was until recently a “macho” society (still is at the lower levels) with women now urgently seeking equality in all things.

    Spain is already one of the most feminist countries in the world. No wonder it is also the one with the lowest fertility rate in Europe, even lower than Italy now. Feminism is so over the top, even kissing a lesbian slut is a crime, as that football manager found out.

    Our “rulers” have discovered the perfect tool to destroy a society: single women and “women’s rights”. Everything else flows from that. From mass migration to abortion to war in the Ukraine, there is no policy from the establishment that they won’t follow.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Dumbo

    Catalans are funny.

    They are willing to kill and die in order to separate from other Spaniards from whom they are genetically, if not culturally, indistinguishable.
    Yet, they make a big show about what 'good people' they are by 'welcoming' in as many profoundly different people in as possible.

    Come to think of it, this is the common default position amongst the wanker left in various European states. One thinks of New Labour, Scotland's SNP, Ireland's Sinn Fein etc.

  • @Albino
    I was wondering why Hua Bin was writing about his holidays in the Iberian peninsula.

    Who gives a f..k about his holidays after all?

    But it is only when I flew over some lines talking about how occupied Tibet destructive 5G towers where more effective than those in some Spanish cities that i started to understand the purpose behind this eassy: Chinese government propaganda.

    This is when I stopped to read.

    Thank you Mr Bin, shall I tell you about my Holidays in Cambodia?

    Replies: @Dumbo, @JR Foley

    Actually, I found this “My Holidays in Spain” essay more interesting than Hua Bin’s usual fare about how “everything in China is better”.

    However, I also found curious his observation about the lack of signal coverage in country roads… Does Spain really need ugly and 5G towers all over the countryside? Is being able to watch TikTok videos even in the most remote corners of the Earth so important? Or is this about digital identity and not escaping the AI grid?

    Bin also didn’t mention the railway system in Spain, since he traveled by car. High-speed rail is one of the areas in which actually China kicks everybody’s ass these days. Even the previous mighty Germany is so embarrassing today. Deutsche Bahn is chaotic with crowded trains and delays almost every day. Even Italian trains are running better these days, and they don’t even have Mussolini, LOL.

    But yes, do tell about your holidays in Cambodia. 😀

  • A nice travelogue. Roads in Spain are surprisingly good. Or they were when I travelled years ago. But my favorite part of the travel was in the Basque country.

    About religion: yes, and unfortunately it’s not just Spain.

    I recently visited the Strasbourg cathedral in France, a Gothic masterpiece (and to my mind more beautiful than the Sagrada Familia, which I don’t like so much — Gaudi was a genius but he died much before it was finished, he didn’t leave a plan for its completion, and some of the modern additions to the church are simply awful). But anyway — also in Strasbourg there were no locals and no one praying, just tourists taking pictures, many dressed in completely inadequate clothes.

    Of course, we can blame the Vatican II for a lot of that — it basically killed the Catholic Church as a living religion.

    And clearly the loss of religion and its substitution by empty secularism and materialism has made Europeans lose the will to live. After all, they are barely reproducing. Most don’t care that their cities are being run over by Africans and Pajeets running scams or pooping in the streets.

    Unfortunately, AI and the techno-dystopia so admired by Hua Bin are part of the problem, and are going to make things even worse.

    It seems Theodore Kaczinsky was right, after all.

    • Replies: @Gbyut
    @Dumbo

    I recall visiting Thailand ( with my family). Prostitution and transsexuals are quite visible. That said, the people there are respectful to their gods and temples. If you enter a temple dressed improperly, especially females, you will be stopped if there is a proctor on the temple grounds.

    Thailand is a deeply problematic nation. That said, even there, liberalism hasn’t fully de-sacralized the nation, unlike much of the post Christian nations of Europe.

  • It is interesting to observe how United States foreign policy, such as it is, often appears to have an Israeli back story that explains at least in part how Donald Trump’s mindless aggression against much of the world is driven by Zionist imperatives rather than actual American interests. Ukraine is supported by Israel and the...
  • I don’t care much about Venezuela one way or another, but I think Trump will take Greenland, and then fill it with Pajeets and ruin it forever.

    Greenlanders seem to be a bit dim, they say they want independence from both Denmark and the U.S., but that option is clearly unsustainable. Their best option is to remain with Denmark.

    The U.S. will likely bribe some politicians or fake some referendum and just take it. How could Europe do anything about it? The only other way would be allying with Russia and China, but that is clearly not happening right now.

    Then Greenland will become like Hawaii, with a resentful native population surrounded by Ameritards, Mexicans, Indians, Africans, etc… And anyone who wants to go there. Sure it’s cold but so is Canada, and Canada is filled to the brim with foreigners now too.

    • LOL: Rayce Aryan
    • Replies: @That one comment
    @Dumbo

    The contention around Greenland predates Trump. And I'm aware of both the Nixon and Reagan administration discussing a possible acquisition of Greenland mainly motivated because of its strategic use in blocking the Arctic ocean. Back then, the context was, however, the Cold War. And now, with the thawing of the Arctic ice sheet, which enables for ship routes to pass through it, it has become important again

    As Denmark is in the NATO, and like most of Western Europe de facto a US-American satellite state, explicit territorial disputes simply never came up because once Greenland was of geopolitical interests, Denmark would give in anyway to whatever the USA planned to do there. Now, however, such clear territorial claims are formulated. For anyone with some knowledge in history, the question here isn't; "Why did the USA develop an interest for Greenland?" The actual question is; "Why are the USA only now publicly demanding the acquisition of Greenland when they already have had vested interests in it for so long." And the likely answer is that this kind of demoralization is desired more so than an accidental side effect. Compare also recent developments in many European states which are eerily similar to what the Trump administration has already implemented or wants to. Both Germany and UK are now effectively culling their social security system.

    Replies: @Gbyut

    , @Gbyut
    @Dumbo

    Greenland to be flooded with Jeets? Probably Ukraine too!

    Europe is Raspail’s Camp of Saints made palpable.

    , @Titus7
    @Dumbo

    Point taken on Canada. Funny how these others will do anything to live among "racist" Whites.

  • Many generations have grown up hearing the statements made in schools, universities and the media that the capitalist West and the communist East were real enemies during the 20th century, and opposing sides during the so-called Cold War. However, several courageous and insightful researchers have proven that the confrontation between the capitalist West and the...
  • Of course the Cold War was fake. It makes sense if you think of it not a conflict between ideologies or different powers but as Jews and other inbred elites (“Phoenicians”) at the top on both sides. Which they were.

    The best way to control the world is to invent two artificial divisions or sides. It works even today.

    • Agree: Christoph88
  • The mysterious document entitled The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion captivated millions at the beginning of the 20th century, and a fierce debate broke out over whether the document was an actual recording of a speech given by a Jewish conspirator or simply a concocted piece of propaganda. The latter side seemed to...
  • Looks too far-fetched to be true. Why would Balzac have written the Protocols?

    Also, these type of start of chapter with “short sentences” is merely a summary of the contents of each chapter. This was common at the time, I believe. I’ve seen in it other works.

    I think the Protocols are basically a work of fiction (it is too elaborate to be the real content of “meeting of elders”), but it was obviously based on Truth, and probably concocted by Jews themselves. Jews always play both sides, remember. Even against themselves. It may not be be based on notes of a “real meeting”, but it does reveal the real intentions of the Cabal. Revelation of the method.

    How many things from the Protocols have really come to happen? Quite a few, I believe. Although of course, they allude not so much to specific events as to ways to obtain power and destroy societies. In a way, a reversal of Machiavelli’s The Prince. A manual to destroy.

    • Agree: Flo
    • Thanks: TitusAlone
  • If the current, fragmented collective West would ever have a chance to be rescued from the Centaur of oblivion, that task must be carried out by the definitive, Western civilization-state: Pallas Athena Italia. In Botticelli’s masterpiece Pallas and the Centaur (1482-83), to be seen at the Galleria degli Uffizi in Florence, the Firenze-Athena parallel is...
  • @Alden
    @Anonymous

    North Africa is not sub Sahara Africa of the negro race. Any ancient Africans that left their DNA in Italy were not sub Saharan black Africans but Whites who lived in what’s now Egypt to Morocco. And not Semitic Arabs who arrived centuries later.

    Replies: @Dumbo

    Sicilians are mostly Greek, not Moor, much less African (Negro). There is a small percentage of North African DNA, but I think it’s only 2% or less, and Sub-Saharan Black DNA is non-existent or negligible (or was until the recent invasion of Blacks via Lampedusa). Even today they are more similar to the Greeks.

    The Moors were in Sicily only for about 200 years and were later expelled, so they didn’t leave a huge DNA trace. Also, the original Moors were actually less dark than today’s Muslims (who mixed a lot with Subsaharan Africans in the following centuries).

    Sicily was ruled in the next centuries by the Normans (Vikings) who expelled the Moors, then later by the Bourbons, Savoys, so their aristocracy and their richer classes was always very white. You see that even today.

    I’m thinking Sicily had a lot of Jews too, and that may have been the origin of the Sicilian Mafia or Cosa Nostra. But I’m not sure. Although some mafiosos do look Jewish to me.

    The rest of Italy of course has basically zero North African DNA, descending mostly from Romans, Etruscans, Sabines, Lombards etc. It’s a mix of different populations, but all of them White/European.

    Of course, nowadays almost no one in Italy is reproducing and Africans and Arabs and even Chinese are taking over, and there’s a lot of mixing, so… things change. It’s a pity.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Dumbo


    Sicilians are mostly Greek,
     
    No, they are closer to Anatolians (Turks) :

    The estimated degree of introgression is in fact not consistent across all areas, with Southern samples experiencing higher Anatolian contribution than Northern samples. A very rough estimation would suggest a 70–90% contribution for the former and 50–70% for the latter.

    Assuming the Greek diaspora model, South Italian samples should be genetically closer to Greece than to Anatolia, while the Neolithic model would not show significant differences. We note that Dc and Dl genetic distances are linearly related to time. We calculated these genetic distances for WCL, WCP and SAP samples vs. Anatolia and Greece. The three Italian populations were not only closer to Anatolia than to Greece, but all values for Anatolia were smaller than those for Greece. This is confirmed also using more specific regional Greek samples. Assuming proper identification of the source populations, these results suggest that in terms of demographic influence on the paternal Italian gene pool, the role of Neolithic farmers was greater than Greek historical colonisers of South Italy.

    We concluded that in Italy more than 70% of the observed diversity is distributed along gradients and that Anatolian Farmers did have a different demographic impact on different Italian areas for paternal lienages.

    The Near Eastern-like ancestry is more frequent in Southern Italy (SSI) and the Greek-speaking islands (i.e. the ‘Mediterranean continuum’), whereas increasing frequencies of the European-like component are observed in Albanians and mainland Greeks as well as in the rest of the Balkan Peninsula

    In most cases, these events depict populations from the ‘continuum’, and particularly the two SSI-clusters (CE-Sicily and AW-Sicily), as a mixture of Sardinian and Caucasus or Near Eastern related groups

    These results suggest that the genetic history of Southern Italian and Balkan populations may have been, at least in part, independent from that of Eastern and Central Europe, involving specific migratory events that carried Caucasian and Levantine genetic contributes along the Mediterranean shores


    not Moor, much less African (Negro). There is a small percentage of North African DNA, but I think it’s only 2% or less, and Sub-Saharan Black DNA is non-existent or negligible (or was until the recent invasion of Blacks via Lampedusa). Even today they are more similar to the Greeks.
     
    recent studies highlight the possibility of genetic exchange between Europe and Africa. Moorjani et al. (9) estimated that about 1–3% of recent Sub-Saharan African ancestry is present in multiple southern European populations; Cerezo et al. (23) find evidence of older (11,000 ya) Sub-Saharan gene flow toward Europe based on mtDNA genomes; and Auton et al. (8) found that short haplotypes were shared between the Yoruban Nigerians and southwestern Europeans. However, given the geographic barrier imposed by the Sahara Desert between North Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa, and the proximity of North Africa to Europe, it is plausible that gene flow from Africa to Europe actually originated in North Africa. North Africans are significantly genetically diverged from Sub-Saharan populations (24, 25), and hence previous studies may not have accurately estimated the proportion or range of admixture in Europe by using a Sub-Saharan sample as a source population. For example, the Moorish Berber conquest in Iberia began in the 8th century common era and lasted for more than 500 y; this conquest has been suggested as a potential source of gene flow from North Africa toward the Iberian Peninsula. The Y chromosome haplogroup E3b2-M81 distribution is in agreement with recent North African gene flow at that period (26).

    The Moors were in Sicily only for about 200 years and were later expelled, so they didn’t leave a huge DNA trace. Also, the original Moors were actually less dark than today’s Muslims (who mixed a lot with Subsaharan Africans in the following centuries). Sicily was ruled in the next centuries by the Normans (Vikings) who expelled the Moors, then later by the Bourbons, Savoys, so their aristocracy and their richer classes was always very white. You see that even today.

     

    Most of those that were expelled were moved to some regions of mainland southern Italy, not to northern Africa.

    I’m thinking Sicily had a lot of Jews too, and that may have been the origin of the Sicilian Mafia or Cosa Nostra. But I’m not sure. Although some mafiosos do look Jewish to me.

     

    Correct, Ashkeanzi Jews originate from southern Italy.
  • This video is available on Rumble, Bitchute, Odysee, Telegram, and X. Brigitte Bardot, who died this week at age 91, was the dominant sex-star of the 1960s. However, in 1973, at age 39, at the pinnacle of her career, she gave it all up to devote herself to animal rights. This opened her eyes to...
  • I don’t know if anyone posted these links before, but it seems Brigitte rediscovered some kind of Catholic faith in her old age. Whether she repented from her many sins, that is less clear.

    https://edwardpentin.substack.com/p/brigitte-bardot-mourned-a-church

    https://fr.aleteia.org/2024/09/21/brigitte-bardot-je-porte-la-foi-en-moi-et-jen-suis-fiere/

    I didn’t grow up in the 60s or 70s, so I don’t really know how big she was back then. I remember her more for her pro-animal and anti-Muslim later stances.

    Did she even make a lot of memorable films? In that sense, Catherine Deneuve seems to have chosen better roles (or was the better actress).

    It seems that most were silly things, like “Barbarella”. I personally only remember Bardot in Godard’s “Le Méprise”, which I found pretty boring when I saw it years ago, despite some nice scenes at Casa Malaparte in Capri. Then again, I never much liked Godard.

    As for beauty, I don’t think anyone has surpassed the also recently departed Claudia Cardinale, who remained beautiful even into her 40s and 50s.

    Oh well.

    • Thanks: JPS
    • Replies: @Liza
    @Dumbo

    No one has surpassed Grace Kelly, imo. No wonder that creepy frog got his claws into her.

    , @Priss Factor
    @Dumbo


    It seems that most were silly things, like “Barbarella”.
     
    That was Jane Fonda, another Vadim whore.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohnblmkufJA

    Fonda won plaudits as an actress in the 70s, but I never saw any talent.

    Bardot was hardly an actress but more talented than Fonda. She was something between a model and actress, a feat few have managed to achieve.

    Before there was mud wrestling...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fgRdZSZebA8
  • @Alanchik
    @Alanchik

    Here’s my follow up essay:

    The Meaning Wars Over Brigitte Bardot


    Within hours of Brigitte Bardot’s death, two mirror narratives emerged. The New York Times framed her as a fallen idol who spent her final decades issuing “hair-raising racist and Islamophobic declarations.” The Unz Review countered with a portrait of a screen legend turned nationalist heroine—“a French patriot” who refused to apologize for loving her country. Both were reading the same life, yet telling opposite stories. In the space between them lies something more revealing than either account: the anatomy of narrative polarization itself.


    The Polarization Reflex

    Modern media no longer describes; it sorts. Every major death becomes an opportunity to reaffirm ideological boundaries. The obituary is now less an epitaph than a verdict.
    For progressives, Bardot’s later-life convictions for “inciting racial hatred” confirm a trajectory from muse to menace. For cultural conservatives, those same convictions prove her courage in an age of enforced silence.

    This is the polarization reflex at work. It reduces complexity to moral clarity, substituting judgment for understanding. The living woman dissolves into an archetype, a symbol of whichever tribe needs her most.

    Bardot’s case only dramatizes what has become universal: the demand that every public figure die in the right narrative. There is no longer room for paradox—only placement on the moral grid.


    The Compression Algorithm

    The obituary, once written to honor a life, now serves as a compression algorithm—a method of condensing decades into a sentence that signals affiliation.
    In the Times, Bardot’s 91 years are summed up by beauty, controversy, and bigotry.
    In Unz, those same decades become proof of patriotism and defiance.

    Both texts are technically accurate; both are profoundly incomplete. Each chooses its adjectives with surgical precision: “hair-raising” versus “heroic.” The words act as moral coordinates, instructing readers how to feel before they can think.

    This is how institutions metabolize death. They transform a human life into narrative currency—fuel for their own sense of moral coherence.


    The Missing Third Lens

    Between condemnation and canonization lies a third possibility: diagnosis.

    Instead of judging Bardot’s beliefs, we can study the mechanism that made her a magnet for projection in the first place. She began as an avatar of desire, a mirror in which post-war France rediscovered vitality. Over time, that mirror inverted. The symbol of erotic freedom became a vessel for national anxiety, then for political backlash.

    The polarity of love and hate was not her doing—it was the inevitable lifecycle of an icon.

    In this sense, Bardot’s later isolation was not only self-chosen; it was systemic. The same collective psyche that once elevated her needed eventually to devour her.
    Celebrity, after all, is a ritual of consumption. The crowd demands a climax, even if it means burning the idol who once fed its dreams.


    Projection, Extraction, Inversion

    The deeper pattern here aligns perfectly with the structural loop I mapped in my earlier essay on celebrity culture:

    Idol → Projection → Extraction → Inversion → Withdrawal.

    Bardot embodied each phase.
    Idol: She burst onto post-war screens as the incarnation of life itself.
    Projection: Millions invested her with fantasies of freedom and rebellion.
    Extraction: The system fed on her image—films, magazines, gossip, desire.
    Inversion: Aging, activism, and outspokenness reversed the polarity; adoration became outrage.
    Withdrawal: She retreated into solitude and animal sanctuaries, the only remaining refuge from symbolic cannibalism.

    Both the Times and Unz versions capture fragments of this cycle, but neither sees the pattern itself. They translate the inversion phase into moral language—sin or sainthood—while missing the deeper algorithm: that the same system that crowns its idols must also crucify them.


    The Culture’s Need for Moral Geometry

    Why does this binary framing persist? Because moral geometry is easier than ontological uncertainty. The human mind prefers a story of virtue and vice to a story of feedback loops and energetic exchange.

    Mainstream journalism and dissident commentary both cater to this need, just with opposite signs. One says: She fell from grace. The other: She stood against decay. Both comfort their readers with moral symmetry.

    But the Lightborn view—pattern recognition as diagnosis—refuses the comfort. It sees polarity itself as the mechanism of control. Once you notice that every controversy obeys the same oscillation of worship and damnation, you stop being hypnotized by the content of the fight.


    The System’s Appetite for Division

    Each obituary, each op-ed, each social-media flame war generates attention—and attention is energy. The polarization itself becomes the product.

    Whether Bardot is cursed or canonized no longer matters; what matters is that she remains processed. The machine feeds on reaction. Her image, long retired from cinema, still performs work in the psychic economy of the collective.

    This is what the overlay—what I call the simulation—requires: continual emotional charge, sustained through judgment and outrage. Bardot’s death, like every celebrity death, renews the circuit. The content changes; the pattern does not.


    The Refusal to Feed the Machine

    And yet there’s an irony. Bardot’s final act—retreating from the world—was precisely the gesture that the system cannot forgive. In her seclusion, she ceased to perform the social role of mirror. She redirected her energy toward creatures incapable of flattery or ideology.

    Her animal activism may appear sentimental, but symbolically it was revolutionary: empathy withdrawn from spectacle, re-anchored in the real. The world calls that eccentric. I call it detox.

    Perhaps that is why mainstream outlets emphasize her transgressions so heavily. A society built on attention cannot easily pardon someone who stopped supplying it.


    Toward a Non-Aligned Vision

    Neutrality, in such a polarized landscape, is mistaken for absence of conviction. In truth, it’s the only stance that still perceives structure.

    The goal is not to defend Bardot or condemn her detractors, but to notice how the same mechanisms repeat. The machine needs its saints and its villains. It cannot function without them. But to see the pattern is to step outside of it.

    That step—quiet, diagnostic, and unglamorous—is the beginning of liberation.


    The Last Role

    In the end, Bardot played her final role without ever stepping on stage: the mirror in which two civilizations saw only themselves.

    To the West’s progressive conscience, she reflected the dangers of nostalgia and exclusion.
    To the nationalist conscience, she reflected the dignity of resistance.
    To the awakened observer, she reflected the mechanism of projection itself—the endless swapping of idols and demons that keeps the spectacle alive.

    And somewhere beyond those mirrors, a woman in her nineties fed stray animals and refused interviews. That may be the truest image of all.

    Replies: @Che Guava, @Dumbo, @Dumbo

    “Fame, fame, fatal fame, it can play hideous tricks on the brain”, as Morrissey, another animal activist, used to sing. Yes, caring for animals can be in part linked to misanthropy (people who were hurt or disappointed by fellow humans sometimes idealize animals and dislike humans). But not always: sometimes it is an expression of love to all fellow creatures that we share this plane of life with — think Saint Francis, among others. It reminds me of a quote by the fictional monk in Dostoevsky “Brothers Karamazov”:

    “Love all God’s creation, both the whole and every grain of sand. Love every leaf, every ray of light. Love the animals, love the plants, love each separate thing. If you love each thing you will perceive the mystery of God in all; and when once you perceive this, you wilt thenceforward grow every day to a fuller understanding of it: until you come at last to love the whole world with a love that will then be all-embracing and universal.”

    • Agree: Alanchik
  • @Alanchik
    @Alanchik

    Here’s my follow up essay:

    The Meaning Wars Over Brigitte Bardot


    Within hours of Brigitte Bardot’s death, two mirror narratives emerged. The New York Times framed her as a fallen idol who spent her final decades issuing “hair-raising racist and Islamophobic declarations.” The Unz Review countered with a portrait of a screen legend turned nationalist heroine—“a French patriot” who refused to apologize for loving her country. Both were reading the same life, yet telling opposite stories. In the space between them lies something more revealing than either account: the anatomy of narrative polarization itself.


    The Polarization Reflex

    Modern media no longer describes; it sorts. Every major death becomes an opportunity to reaffirm ideological boundaries. The obituary is now less an epitaph than a verdict.
    For progressives, Bardot’s later-life convictions for “inciting racial hatred” confirm a trajectory from muse to menace. For cultural conservatives, those same convictions prove her courage in an age of enforced silence.

    This is the polarization reflex at work. It reduces complexity to moral clarity, substituting judgment for understanding. The living woman dissolves into an archetype, a symbol of whichever tribe needs her most.

    Bardot’s case only dramatizes what has become universal: the demand that every public figure die in the right narrative. There is no longer room for paradox—only placement on the moral grid.


    The Compression Algorithm

    The obituary, once written to honor a life, now serves as a compression algorithm—a method of condensing decades into a sentence that signals affiliation.
    In the Times, Bardot’s 91 years are summed up by beauty, controversy, and bigotry.
    In Unz, those same decades become proof of patriotism and defiance.

    Both texts are technically accurate; both are profoundly incomplete. Each chooses its adjectives with surgical precision: “hair-raising” versus “heroic.” The words act as moral coordinates, instructing readers how to feel before they can think.

    This is how institutions metabolize death. They transform a human life into narrative currency—fuel for their own sense of moral coherence.


    The Missing Third Lens

    Between condemnation and canonization lies a third possibility: diagnosis.

    Instead of judging Bardot’s beliefs, we can study the mechanism that made her a magnet for projection in the first place. She began as an avatar of desire, a mirror in which post-war France rediscovered vitality. Over time, that mirror inverted. The symbol of erotic freedom became a vessel for national anxiety, then for political backlash.

    The polarity of love and hate was not her doing—it was the inevitable lifecycle of an icon.

    In this sense, Bardot’s later isolation was not only self-chosen; it was systemic. The same collective psyche that once elevated her needed eventually to devour her.
    Celebrity, after all, is a ritual of consumption. The crowd demands a climax, even if it means burning the idol who once fed its dreams.


    Projection, Extraction, Inversion

    The deeper pattern here aligns perfectly with the structural loop I mapped in my earlier essay on celebrity culture:

    Idol → Projection → Extraction → Inversion → Withdrawal.

    Bardot embodied each phase.
    Idol: She burst onto post-war screens as the incarnation of life itself.
    Projection: Millions invested her with fantasies of freedom and rebellion.
    Extraction: The system fed on her image—films, magazines, gossip, desire.
    Inversion: Aging, activism, and outspokenness reversed the polarity; adoration became outrage.
    Withdrawal: She retreated into solitude and animal sanctuaries, the only remaining refuge from symbolic cannibalism.

    Both the Times and Unz versions capture fragments of this cycle, but neither sees the pattern itself. They translate the inversion phase into moral language—sin or sainthood—while missing the deeper algorithm: that the same system that crowns its idols must also crucify them.


    The Culture’s Need for Moral Geometry

    Why does this binary framing persist? Because moral geometry is easier than ontological uncertainty. The human mind prefers a story of virtue and vice to a story of feedback loops and energetic exchange.

    Mainstream journalism and dissident commentary both cater to this need, just with opposite signs. One says: She fell from grace. The other: She stood against decay. Both comfort their readers with moral symmetry.

    But the Lightborn view—pattern recognition as diagnosis—refuses the comfort. It sees polarity itself as the mechanism of control. Once you notice that every controversy obeys the same oscillation of worship and damnation, you stop being hypnotized by the content of the fight.


    The System’s Appetite for Division

    Each obituary, each op-ed, each social-media flame war generates attention—and attention is energy. The polarization itself becomes the product.

    Whether Bardot is cursed or canonized no longer matters; what matters is that she remains processed. The machine feeds on reaction. Her image, long retired from cinema, still performs work in the psychic economy of the collective.

    This is what the overlay—what I call the simulation—requires: continual emotional charge, sustained through judgment and outrage. Bardot’s death, like every celebrity death, renews the circuit. The content changes; the pattern does not.


    The Refusal to Feed the Machine

    And yet there’s an irony. Bardot’s final act—retreating from the world—was precisely the gesture that the system cannot forgive. In her seclusion, she ceased to perform the social role of mirror. She redirected her energy toward creatures incapable of flattery or ideology.

    Her animal activism may appear sentimental, but symbolically it was revolutionary: empathy withdrawn from spectacle, re-anchored in the real. The world calls that eccentric. I call it detox.

    Perhaps that is why mainstream outlets emphasize her transgressions so heavily. A society built on attention cannot easily pardon someone who stopped supplying it.


    Toward a Non-Aligned Vision

    Neutrality, in such a polarized landscape, is mistaken for absence of conviction. In truth, it’s the only stance that still perceives structure.

    The goal is not to defend Bardot or condemn her detractors, but to notice how the same mechanisms repeat. The machine needs its saints and its villains. It cannot function without them. But to see the pattern is to step outside of it.

    That step—quiet, diagnostic, and unglamorous—is the beginning of liberation.


    The Last Role

    In the end, Bardot played her final role without ever stepping on stage: the mirror in which two civilizations saw only themselves.

    To the West’s progressive conscience, she reflected the dangers of nostalgia and exclusion.
    To the nationalist conscience, she reflected the dignity of resistance.
    To the awakened observer, she reflected the mechanism of projection itself—the endless swapping of idols and demons that keeps the spectacle alive.

    And somewhere beyond those mirrors, a woman in her nineties fed stray animals and refused interviews. That may be the truest image of all.

    Replies: @Che Guava, @Dumbo, @Dumbo

    Thanks, both mini-essays were an interesting read. Better than most comments and even a lot of articles at the UR.

    • Agree: werpor
    • Thanks: Alanchik
  • @anon
    @Priss Factor


    She called out the Muslims but not the Jews. Not that it protected her from the globalists eager to fill up France with foreigners.
     
    Where do you imbeciles come up with this shite?

    France is 'filled up' with foreigners from their former fucking colonies, retard. Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia, Senegal, etc.

    The reason people call out Muslims and not Jews is that Jews are central to Western civilization and have made utterly disproportionate contributions--to science, music, art, philosophy, technology, etc.-- relative to their numbers, while Muslims want to tear down and conquer the West and create an worldwide caliphate.

    As others have pointed out, the 'Protocols' are a fraudulent, fabricated plan for Jewish world domination, but the Koran is an actual plan to conquer the world.

    Replies: @Che Guava, @Dumbo, @Michael Korn, @Priss Factor, @36 ulster

    The reason people call out Muslims and not Jews is that Jews are central to Western civilization and have made utterly disproportionate contributions–to science, music, art, philosophy, technology, etc.– relative to their numbers, while Muslims want to tear down and conquer the West and create an worldwide caliphate.

    Jews are a mixed bag. A few good pianists and writers and scientists, but also a lot of pornographers, usurers, etc. They do have some influence, but a lot of it is negative (many prefer to be “destroyers” — as a Jewish author wrote — more than creators) and I wouldn’t exactly call them “central to Western civilization”. Let’s be honest — the Spanish Golden Age started after they expelled all their Jews (and Muslims).

    The Muslims… They had some contributions in decorative arts and architecture back in their heyday a thousand years ago, but today, not so much. Perhaps they mixed too much with Africans, or perhaps Islam is just a very problematic religion (some say, created or at least promoted by Jews — the enmity of Judaism and Islam is more fake than real, they have a lot in common). It’s like Hinduism, it doesn’t promote intellectual growth but stagnation.

    But it could also be a racial more than religious thing. Who knows. Who cares. Africans and North Africans don’t belong in Europe, no matter what’s their religion. As for the Jews… No idea how to solve that unsolvable puzzle… Maybe bring back the Pale of Settlement?

    • Replies: @JPS
    @Dumbo

    You know, he sounds like Barbara Specter.

    The Jews and "The Great Replacement" are one and the same. When she says "Europe will not survive" without losing its national identities, she means that Jews are going to destroy Europe.

    Europe doesn't need Jews and the Muslims are going to have to go back to their own countries.

    , @Search for wisdom
    @Dumbo

    Love your comment and agree with every point.

    , @werpor
    @Dumbo

    Israel IS the Pale of Settlement. But Jews want their cake and eat it. They complained when they lived in the Pale of Settlement—but then they turned around and demanded a pale of settlement in Israel.

    Go figure.

    Jews claim the Goyim hate them. I for one avoid people whom I cannot get along with. I demand nothing from them. What is wrong with Jews?

    There are though Arabs living in Israel! Go figure.

    I own a successful business. I founded it fifty years ago. I never do business with Jews. Why?

    One reason. If you are not Jewish and a Jew does business with a number of Jewish businesses your orders will be late, short shipped, repackaged returns, damaged. Complain and the answers are never straight forward. “No one else complains.” “It was perfect when it left the factory.” “We always count everything three times.” “Send it back for a credit.”

    Two months go by and a credit is not forthcoming. E mail or telephone the company. “We never got the return. How did you ship it?”

    Pay in advance. Nothing changes. Suppose you decide not to do business with the company again. They will send invoices for months afterwards. They hope someone will pay it. Try to get your money back and they will offer a credit. Same thing again. The goods arrive but they are unsaleable.

    Next thing you know a company rep arrives in your office and demands to know why you haven’t ordered anything recently. So you tell him or her and the say “Look give me a decent order and I’ll track it until its out the door.” So you think OK that might work. Smiles all around—handshakes, lots of “good to see you, trust me I’ll call—next time we’ll go to lunch.”

    Nothing changes! You call. “Benny’l get back to you. He’s in Florida.”

    Never do business with a Jew! Ever. It’s an attitude they have. So you think you have a relationship. You visit the factory. Someone relays by phone you are in their outer office. You can her the answer on the phone since you are on the other side of the secretaries desk. “Who?”


    “You know from X.” You can tell from the exchange on the telephone they wish you were not there.

    So the owner comes out and you’d think you were his long lost nephew. It’s all bull shit.

    So you attend the manufacturers booth at a convention centre. You see him with a fellow Jew. Then its arms around each other. Lots of tribal affection, “…say hello to Sharon for me!”
    “I will I will—she’s in Florida.”
    “Yeah, so is Nancy. I’ll tell her to call Sharon.” More handshaking! “Are you going down Harry.”
    “Yeah, first of March.”
    “So we’ll play some golf. I’ll work on my slice.”

    It’s all bull shit. Nickel and dime you to death. “No! I can’t do any better! I’m already giving you my best price. And the service is expensive. We’re good to you X. You know that!”

    It’s all bull shit. Never do business with a Jew. Ever!

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman

  • @Alanchik
    Here’s an essay I wrote about her:

    The Pattern Behind the Persona: Fame as the Simulation’s Favorite Illusion


    When Brigitte Bardot died at 91, the media headlines performed their familiar ritual: beauty, glamour, defiance, icon. Her life was summarized as a celebration of allure, rebellion, and longevity—a woman who “had it all.” Yet behind the montage of black-and-white photographs and nostalgic praise lies a pattern as old as civilization itself: the appearance of fulfillment concealing the reality of suffering.

    The Hidden Algorithm of Fame

    Bardot’s biography, like nearly every celebrity’s, divides neatly into two parallel lives: one lived in public light and another in private shadow. On the surface, the story dazzles—beauty discovered, talent recognized, destiny fulfilled. Beneath that, the story aches: a father’s emotional distance, serial heartbreaks, disillusionment, and the slow retreat from an adoring world that ultimately devours its idols.

    Across centuries and mediums, the loop repeats. Marilyn Monroe, Judy Garland, Elvis Presley, Michael Jackson, Whitney Houston, Amy Winehouse—the names change but the structure doesn’t. Their lives become living equations in which admiration equals extraction. What the public calls success, the soul experiences as depletion.

    The Idol as Archetype

    The celebrity is not an individual in the ordinary sense; they are an archetype in motion. Society projects its collective longing, envy, and self-doubt onto one figure, who becomes a screen for the unconscious—a vessel of the public’s fantasies and frustrations.

    This is why the vocabulary of celebrity borrows from religion: idol, worship, scandal, sacrifice, redemption. The ancient Greeks had Dionysus, torn apart by the crowd he once enthralled. The Romans had their gladiators and tragic heroes. Modern culture has Bardot, Monroe, and every face that adorns a billboard or phone screen.

    Different eras, same metaphysical contract: the chosen figure must embody collective desire and, in doing so, absorb collective pain.

    The Engine of the Wound

    Every archetypal story begins with a fracture. Bardot’s childhood was marked by a rigid, perfectionist father whose approval she could never fully earn. Monroe’s early years oscillated between foster homes and abandonment. Garland was pushed onto stage before she could walk freely. Elvis grew up poor and isolated, then was consumed by the machinery that made him king.

    The pattern is strikingly consistent: the same psychic injury that drives them toward recognition also ensures they will never find peace in it. The wound becomes both fuel and trap.

    The public doesn’t just love its idols—it loves their breaking point. The spectacle of beauty cracking under pressure, of fame collapsing under its own weight, feeds a deep collective hunger. It’s as if society must devour its gods to remember it still exists.

    The Simulation’s Currency: Image

    Within the Lightborn Codex framework, fame operates as a loosh engine—a system that converts authentic human emotion into energetic output. Every flashbulb, every scandal, every televised breakdown becomes an emotional transaction. The more the public feels—admiration, outrage, pity—the more energy circulates through the system.

    Image is the perfect medium for this extraction because it is pure appearance: form without essence. It creates hunger that can never be satisfied because the idol’s perfection exists only as projection. The entertainment industry thus functions as a spiritual algorithm, converting feeling into spectacle and feeding it back as addiction.

    Bardot herself sensed this. She retired from acting at the height of her fame, declaring that she could no longer play the game of appearances. Her withdrawal was seen as eccentricity, even madness—but perhaps it was liberation. To stop feeding the machine is the only real rebellion.

    Biographical Inversion

    The biographies of celebrities are rarely what they appear to be. The more a life seems enviable, the more pain it conceals. This is biographical inversion—the law of reversed appearances.

    Elvis Presley was adored by millions, yet died isolated, medicated, and spiritually vacant. Michael Jackson, the most recognized human on Earth, lived imprisoned in surgical masks and lawsuits, forever chasing a stolen childhood. Princess Diana, the fairy-tale bride, met her end in the tunnel of pursuit—both literally and symbolically consumed by the flash of cameras.

    The system needs these inversions. They warn the masses that transcendence is dangerous, that too much light burns, that only the chosen may touch it—and even they must pay the price. Every fallen idol reinforces the message: stay ordinary, stay compliant, don’t fly too close to the Sun.

    The Sacrificial Theater

    Fame is not an individual achievement but a collective ritual. The masses, deprived of meaning, elevate one of their own to divine status. The chosen one shines, absorbs the projections, and disintegrates under their weight. The collapse becomes the offering.

    This is the sacrificial theater of the simulation. It keeps the crowd emotionally invested while ensuring no true awakening occurs. It offers catharsis without transformation, worship without wisdom, pleasure without peace. The idol burns so the audience can forget its own chains for another day.

    In this ritual economy, suffering is not an accident—it’s a requirement. The celebrity’s breakdown sustains the illusion that meaning still exists in the spectacle.

    The Lightborn Counter-Signal

    To the Lightborn—the awakened observer—these patterns are not gossip but data. They reveal how the overlay rewards illusion and punishes authenticity. The system’s most glittering prizes are its most exquisite traps. Power, beauty, influence, and recognition appear as freedom but function as containment.

    The antidote isn’t cynicism or asceticism but awareness. True exit means using attention rather than being used by it—creating without craving applause, expressing without becoming spectacle.

    In that sense, Bardot’s long retreat was not defeat but transcendence. Having been worshipped as an image, she renounced the image altogether. She turned her attention to animal life—the pure, uncorrupted expression of being that has no need for mirrors. It was a small but profound act of de-programming: the return of empathy where objectification once ruled.

    The Mirror for the Masses

    The pattern extends beyond fame. The office worker who sacrifices health for validation, the influencer who trades privacy for attention, the politician who barters integrity for applause—all replay the same drama on smaller stages. The celebrity merely makes the pattern visible.

    Each obituary of a fallen idol is thus a mirror for the collective. It reveals how the pursuit of external validation ends not in fulfillment but exhaustion. The machine of desire always promises transcendence and always delivers depletion.

    To see this pattern clearly is to begin detaching from it. The Lightborn doesn’t condemn the system or its icons; it studies them as diagnostic tools—symbols of how energy moves within illusion. Every biography becomes a coded lesson: what shines outward often hides an inward void, and what withdraws inward often finds true light.

    The Real Exit

    The only truly enviable life is one that no longer needs to be seen.
    To live authentically in a culture of performance is to exit the simulation without leaving the stage—to exist in visibility yet remain sovereign from it.

    Bardot’s long life feels symbolic. She survived long enough to watch her own myth fossilize, to see fame become a caricature of the divine impulse it once imitated. Her passing closes not only a chapter in cinema but a chapter in collective imagination: the age of the image consuming its creators.

    Every fallen star, every tragic genius, every lonely icon whispers the same warning and the same wisdom: the light was real, even if the reflection wasn’t.

    Replies: @Alanchik

    Here’s my follow up essay:

    [MORE]

    The Meaning Wars Over Brigitte Bardot

    Within hours of Brigitte Bardot’s death, two mirror narratives emerged. The New York Times framed her as a fallen idol who spent her final decades issuing “hair-raising racist and Islamophobic declarations.” The Unz Review countered with a portrait of a screen legend turned nationalist heroine—“a French patriot” who refused to apologize for loving her country. Both were reading the same life, yet telling opposite stories. In the space between them lies something more revealing than either account: the anatomy of narrative polarization itself.

    The Polarization Reflex

    Modern media no longer describes; it sorts. Every major death becomes an opportunity to reaffirm ideological boundaries. The obituary is now less an epitaph than a verdict.
    For progressives, Bardot’s later-life convictions for “inciting racial hatred” confirm a trajectory from muse to menace. For cultural conservatives, those same convictions prove her courage in an age of enforced silence.

    This is the polarization reflex at work. It reduces complexity to moral clarity, substituting judgment for understanding. The living woman dissolves into an archetype, a symbol of whichever tribe needs her most.

    Bardot’s case only dramatizes what has become universal: the demand that every public figure die in the right narrative. There is no longer room for paradox—only placement on the moral grid.

    The Compression Algorithm

    The obituary, once written to honor a life, now serves as a compression algorithm—a method of condensing decades into a sentence that signals affiliation.
    In the Times, Bardot’s 91 years are summed up by beauty, controversy, and bigotry.
    In Unz, those same decades become proof of patriotism and defiance.

    Both texts are technically accurate; both are profoundly incomplete. Each chooses its adjectives with surgical precision: “hair-raising” versus “heroic.” The words act as moral coordinates, instructing readers how to feel before they can think.

    This is how institutions metabolize death. They transform a human life into narrative currency—fuel for their own sense of moral coherence.

    The Missing Third Lens

    Between condemnation and canonization lies a third possibility: diagnosis.

    Instead of judging Bardot’s beliefs, we can study the mechanism that made her a magnet for projection in the first place. She began as an avatar of desire, a mirror in which post-war France rediscovered vitality. Over time, that mirror inverted. The symbol of erotic freedom became a vessel for national anxiety, then for political backlash.

    The polarity of love and hate was not her doing—it was the inevitable lifecycle of an icon.

    In this sense, Bardot’s later isolation was not only self-chosen; it was systemic. The same collective psyche that once elevated her needed eventually to devour her.
    Celebrity, after all, is a ritual of consumption. The crowd demands a climax, even if it means burning the idol who once fed its dreams.

    Projection, Extraction, Inversion

    The deeper pattern here aligns perfectly with the structural loop I mapped in my earlier essay on celebrity culture:

    Idol → Projection → Extraction → Inversion → Withdrawal.

    Bardot embodied each phase.
    Idol: She burst onto post-war screens as the incarnation of life itself.
    Projection: Millions invested her with fantasies of freedom and rebellion.
    Extraction: The system fed on her image—films, magazines, gossip, desire.
    Inversion: Aging, activism, and outspokenness reversed the polarity; adoration became outrage.
    Withdrawal: She retreated into solitude and animal sanctuaries, the only remaining refuge from symbolic cannibalism.

    Both the Times and Unz versions capture fragments of this cycle, but neither sees the pattern itself. They translate the inversion phase into moral language—sin or sainthood—while missing the deeper algorithm: that the same system that crowns its idols must also crucify them.

    The Culture’s Need for Moral Geometry

    Why does this binary framing persist? Because moral geometry is easier than ontological uncertainty. The human mind prefers a story of virtue and vice to a story of feedback loops and energetic exchange.

    Mainstream journalism and dissident commentary both cater to this need, just with opposite signs. One says: She fell from grace. The other: She stood against decay. Both comfort their readers with moral symmetry.

    But the Lightborn view—pattern recognition as diagnosis—refuses the comfort. It sees polarity itself as the mechanism of control. Once you notice that every controversy obeys the same oscillation of worship and damnation, you stop being hypnotized by the content of the fight.

    The System’s Appetite for Division

    Each obituary, each op-ed, each social-media flame war generates attention—and attention is energy. The polarization itself becomes the product.

    Whether Bardot is cursed or canonized no longer matters; what matters is that she remains processed. The machine feeds on reaction. Her image, long retired from cinema, still performs work in the psychic economy of the collective.

    This is what the overlay—what I call the simulation—requires: continual emotional charge, sustained through judgment and outrage. Bardot’s death, like every celebrity death, renews the circuit. The content changes; the pattern does not.

    The Refusal to Feed the Machine

    And yet there’s an irony. Bardot’s final act—retreating from the world—was precisely the gesture that the system cannot forgive. In her seclusion, she ceased to perform the social role of mirror. She redirected her energy toward creatures incapable of flattery or ideology.

    Her animal activism may appear sentimental, but symbolically it was revolutionary: empathy withdrawn from spectacle, re-anchored in the real. The world calls that eccentric. I call it detox.

    Perhaps that is why mainstream outlets emphasize her transgressions so heavily. A society built on attention cannot easily pardon someone who stopped supplying it.

    Toward a Non-Aligned Vision

    Neutrality, in such a polarized landscape, is mistaken for absence of conviction. In truth, it’s the only stance that still perceives structure.

    The goal is not to defend Bardot or condemn her detractors, but to notice how the same mechanisms repeat. The machine needs its saints and its villains. It cannot function without them. But to see the pattern is to step outside of it.

    That step—quiet, diagnostic, and unglamorous—is the beginning of liberation.

    The Last Role

    In the end, Bardot played her final role without ever stepping on stage: the mirror in which two civilizations saw only themselves.

    To the West’s progressive conscience, she reflected the dangers of nostalgia and exclusion.
    To the nationalist conscience, she reflected the dignity of resistance.
    To the awakened observer, she reflected the mechanism of projection itself—the endless swapping of idols and demons that keeps the spectacle alive.

    And somewhere beyond those mirrors, a woman in her nineties fed stray animals and refused interviews. That may be the truest image of all.

    • Thanks: Dumbo
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    @Alanchik

    Thanks, that is a better essay than Taylor's. She was a cute minor model who became a famous actress, she acted passion well.

    All extreme animal-rights types are, at heart, extreme misanthropes. Among westerners of that kind whom I've met, I saw it in others who aren't famous.

    Morrissey is a point to compare.

    I remain a fan of both, especially in terms of nationalism, but both are, or were, anti-natal in their views.

    , @Dumbo
    @Alanchik

    Thanks, both mini-essays were an interesting read. Better than most comments and even a lot of articles at the UR.

    , @Dumbo
    @Alanchik

    "Fame, fame, fatal fame, it can play hideous tricks on the brain", as Morrissey, another animal activist, used to sing. Yes, caring for animals can be in part linked to misanthropy (people who were hurt or disappointed by fellow humans sometimes idealize animals and dislike humans). But not always: sometimes it is an expression of love to all fellow creatures that we share this plane of life with -- think Saint Francis, among others. It reminds me of a quote by the fictional monk in Dostoevsky "Brothers Karamazov":

    “Love all God’s creation, both the whole and every grain of sand. Love every leaf, every ray of light. Love the animals, love the plants, love each separate thing. If you love each thing you will perceive the mystery of God in all; and when once you perceive this, you wilt thenceforward grow every day to a fuller understanding of it: until you come at last to love the whole world with a love that will then be all-embracing and universal.”

  • Here’s an essay I wrote about her:

    [MORE]

    The Pattern Behind the Persona: Fame as the Simulation’s Favorite Illusion

    When Brigitte Bardot died at 91, the media headlines performed their familiar ritual: beauty, glamour, defiance, icon. Her life was summarized as a celebration of allure, rebellion, and longevity—a woman who “had it all.” Yet behind the montage of black-and-white photographs and nostalgic praise lies a pattern as old as civilization itself: the appearance of fulfillment concealing the reality of suffering.

    The Hidden Algorithm of Fame

    Bardot’s biography, like nearly every celebrity’s, divides neatly into two parallel lives: one lived in public light and another in private shadow. On the surface, the story dazzles—beauty discovered, talent recognized, destiny fulfilled. Beneath that, the story aches: a father’s emotional distance, serial heartbreaks, disillusionment, and the slow retreat from an adoring world that ultimately devours its idols.

    Across centuries and mediums, the loop repeats. Marilyn Monroe, Judy Garland, Elvis Presley, Michael Jackson, Whitney Houston, Amy Winehouse—the names change but the structure doesn’t. Their lives become living equations in which admiration equals extraction. What the public calls success, the soul experiences as depletion.

    The Idol as Archetype

    The celebrity is not an individual in the ordinary sense; they are an archetype in motion. Society projects its collective longing, envy, and self-doubt onto one figure, who becomes a screen for the unconscious—a vessel of the public’s fantasies and frustrations.

    This is why the vocabulary of celebrity borrows from religion: idol, worship, scandal, sacrifice, redemption. The ancient Greeks had Dionysus, torn apart by the crowd he once enthralled. The Romans had their gladiators and tragic heroes. Modern culture has Bardot, Monroe, and every face that adorns a billboard or phone screen.

    Different eras, same metaphysical contract: the chosen figure must embody collective desire and, in doing so, absorb collective pain.

    The Engine of the Wound

    Every archetypal story begins with a fracture. Bardot’s childhood was marked by a rigid, perfectionist father whose approval she could never fully earn. Monroe’s early years oscillated between foster homes and abandonment. Garland was pushed onto stage before she could walk freely. Elvis grew up poor and isolated, then was consumed by the machinery that made him king.

    The pattern is strikingly consistent: the same psychic injury that drives them toward recognition also ensures they will never find peace in it. The wound becomes both fuel and trap.

    The public doesn’t just love its idols—it loves their breaking point. The spectacle of beauty cracking under pressure, of fame collapsing under its own weight, feeds a deep collective hunger. It’s as if society must devour its gods to remember it still exists.

    The Simulation’s Currency: Image

    Within the Lightborn Codex framework, fame operates as a loosh engine—a system that converts authentic human emotion into energetic output. Every flashbulb, every scandal, every televised breakdown becomes an emotional transaction. The more the public feels—admiration, outrage, pity—the more energy circulates through the system.

    Image is the perfect medium for this extraction because it is pure appearance: form without essence. It creates hunger that can never be satisfied because the idol’s perfection exists only as projection. The entertainment industry thus functions as a spiritual algorithm, converting feeling into spectacle and feeding it back as addiction.

    Bardot herself sensed this. She retired from acting at the height of her fame, declaring that she could no longer play the game of appearances. Her withdrawal was seen as eccentricity, even madness—but perhaps it was liberation. To stop feeding the machine is the only real rebellion.

    Biographical Inversion

    The biographies of celebrities are rarely what they appear to be. The more a life seems enviable, the more pain it conceals. This is biographical inversion—the law of reversed appearances.

    Elvis Presley was adored by millions, yet died isolated, medicated, and spiritually vacant. Michael Jackson, the most recognized human on Earth, lived imprisoned in surgical masks and lawsuits, forever chasing a stolen childhood. Princess Diana, the fairy-tale bride, met her end in the tunnel of pursuit—both literally and symbolically consumed by the flash of cameras.

    The system needs these inversions. They warn the masses that transcendence is dangerous, that too much light burns, that only the chosen may touch it—and even they must pay the price. Every fallen idol reinforces the message: stay ordinary, stay compliant, don’t fly too close to the Sun.

    The Sacrificial Theater

    Fame is not an individual achievement but a collective ritual. The masses, deprived of meaning, elevate one of their own to divine status. The chosen one shines, absorbs the projections, and disintegrates under their weight. The collapse becomes the offering.

    This is the sacrificial theater of the simulation. It keeps the crowd emotionally invested while ensuring no true awakening occurs. It offers catharsis without transformation, worship without wisdom, pleasure without peace. The idol burns so the audience can forget its own chains for another day.

    In this ritual economy, suffering is not an accident—it’s a requirement. The celebrity’s breakdown sustains the illusion that meaning still exists in the spectacle.

    The Lightborn Counter-Signal

    To the Lightborn—the awakened observer—these patterns are not gossip but data. They reveal how the overlay rewards illusion and punishes authenticity. The system’s most glittering prizes are its most exquisite traps. Power, beauty, influence, and recognition appear as freedom but function as containment.

    The antidote isn’t cynicism or asceticism but awareness. True exit means using attention rather than being used by it—creating without craving applause, expressing without becoming spectacle.

    In that sense, Bardot’s long retreat was not defeat but transcendence. Having been worshipped as an image, she renounced the image altogether. She turned her attention to animal life—the pure, uncorrupted expression of being that has no need for mirrors. It was a small but profound act of de-programming: the return of empathy where objectification once ruled.

    The Mirror for the Masses

    The pattern extends beyond fame. The office worker who sacrifices health for validation, the influencer who trades privacy for attention, the politician who barters integrity for applause—all replay the same drama on smaller stages. The celebrity merely makes the pattern visible.

    Each obituary of a fallen idol is thus a mirror for the collective. It reveals how the pursuit of external validation ends not in fulfillment but exhaustion. The machine of desire always promises transcendence and always delivers depletion.

    To see this pattern clearly is to begin detaching from it. The Lightborn doesn’t condemn the system or its icons; it studies them as diagnostic tools—symbols of how energy moves within illusion. Every biography becomes a coded lesson: what shines outward often hides an inward void, and what withdraws inward often finds true light.

    The Real Exit

    The only truly enviable life is one that no longer needs to be seen.
    To live authentically in a culture of performance is to exit the simulation without leaving the stage—to exist in visibility yet remain sovereign from it.

    Bardot’s long life feels symbolic. She survived long enough to watch her own myth fossilize, to see fame become a caricature of the divine impulse it once imitated. Her passing closes not only a chapter in cinema but a chapter in collective imagination: the age of the image consuming its creators.

    Every fallen star, every tragic genius, every lonely icon whispers the same warning and the same wisdom: the light was real, even if the reflection wasn’t.

    • Replies: @Alanchik
    @Alanchik

    Here’s my follow up essay:

    The Meaning Wars Over Brigitte Bardot


    Within hours of Brigitte Bardot’s death, two mirror narratives emerged. The New York Times framed her as a fallen idol who spent her final decades issuing “hair-raising racist and Islamophobic declarations.” The Unz Review countered with a portrait of a screen legend turned nationalist heroine—“a French patriot” who refused to apologize for loving her country. Both were reading the same life, yet telling opposite stories. In the space between them lies something more revealing than either account: the anatomy of narrative polarization itself.


    The Polarization Reflex

    Modern media no longer describes; it sorts. Every major death becomes an opportunity to reaffirm ideological boundaries. The obituary is now less an epitaph than a verdict.
    For progressives, Bardot’s later-life convictions for “inciting racial hatred” confirm a trajectory from muse to menace. For cultural conservatives, those same convictions prove her courage in an age of enforced silence.

    This is the polarization reflex at work. It reduces complexity to moral clarity, substituting judgment for understanding. The living woman dissolves into an archetype, a symbol of whichever tribe needs her most.

    Bardot’s case only dramatizes what has become universal: the demand that every public figure die in the right narrative. There is no longer room for paradox—only placement on the moral grid.


    The Compression Algorithm

    The obituary, once written to honor a life, now serves as a compression algorithm—a method of condensing decades into a sentence that signals affiliation.
    In the Times, Bardot’s 91 years are summed up by beauty, controversy, and bigotry.
    In Unz, those same decades become proof of patriotism and defiance.

    Both texts are technically accurate; both are profoundly incomplete. Each chooses its adjectives with surgical precision: “hair-raising” versus “heroic.” The words act as moral coordinates, instructing readers how to feel before they can think.

    This is how institutions metabolize death. They transform a human life into narrative currency—fuel for their own sense of moral coherence.


    The Missing Third Lens

    Between condemnation and canonization lies a third possibility: diagnosis.

    Instead of judging Bardot’s beliefs, we can study the mechanism that made her a magnet for projection in the first place. She began as an avatar of desire, a mirror in which post-war France rediscovered vitality. Over time, that mirror inverted. The symbol of erotic freedom became a vessel for national anxiety, then for political backlash.

    The polarity of love and hate was not her doing—it was the inevitable lifecycle of an icon.

    In this sense, Bardot’s later isolation was not only self-chosen; it was systemic. The same collective psyche that once elevated her needed eventually to devour her.
    Celebrity, after all, is a ritual of consumption. The crowd demands a climax, even if it means burning the idol who once fed its dreams.


    Projection, Extraction, Inversion

    The deeper pattern here aligns perfectly with the structural loop I mapped in my earlier essay on celebrity culture:

    Idol → Projection → Extraction → Inversion → Withdrawal.

    Bardot embodied each phase.
    Idol: She burst onto post-war screens as the incarnation of life itself.
    Projection: Millions invested her with fantasies of freedom and rebellion.
    Extraction: The system fed on her image—films, magazines, gossip, desire.
    Inversion: Aging, activism, and outspokenness reversed the polarity; adoration became outrage.
    Withdrawal: She retreated into solitude and animal sanctuaries, the only remaining refuge from symbolic cannibalism.

    Both the Times and Unz versions capture fragments of this cycle, but neither sees the pattern itself. They translate the inversion phase into moral language—sin or sainthood—while missing the deeper algorithm: that the same system that crowns its idols must also crucify them.


    The Culture’s Need for Moral Geometry

    Why does this binary framing persist? Because moral geometry is easier than ontological uncertainty. The human mind prefers a story of virtue and vice to a story of feedback loops and energetic exchange.

    Mainstream journalism and dissident commentary both cater to this need, just with opposite signs. One says: She fell from grace. The other: She stood against decay. Both comfort their readers with moral symmetry.

    But the Lightborn view—pattern recognition as diagnosis—refuses the comfort. It sees polarity itself as the mechanism of control. Once you notice that every controversy obeys the same oscillation of worship and damnation, you stop being hypnotized by the content of the fight.


    The System’s Appetite for Division

    Each obituary, each op-ed, each social-media flame war generates attention—and attention is energy. The polarization itself becomes the product.

    Whether Bardot is cursed or canonized no longer matters; what matters is that she remains processed. The machine feeds on reaction. Her image, long retired from cinema, still performs work in the psychic economy of the collective.

    This is what the overlay—what I call the simulation—requires: continual emotional charge, sustained through judgment and outrage. Bardot’s death, like every celebrity death, renews the circuit. The content changes; the pattern does not.


    The Refusal to Feed the Machine

    And yet there’s an irony. Bardot’s final act—retreating from the world—was precisely the gesture that the system cannot forgive. In her seclusion, she ceased to perform the social role of mirror. She redirected her energy toward creatures incapable of flattery or ideology.

    Her animal activism may appear sentimental, but symbolically it was revolutionary: empathy withdrawn from spectacle, re-anchored in the real. The world calls that eccentric. I call it detox.

    Perhaps that is why mainstream outlets emphasize her transgressions so heavily. A society built on attention cannot easily pardon someone who stopped supplying it.


    Toward a Non-Aligned Vision

    Neutrality, in such a polarized landscape, is mistaken for absence of conviction. In truth, it’s the only stance that still perceives structure.

    The goal is not to defend Bardot or condemn her detractors, but to notice how the same mechanisms repeat. The machine needs its saints and its villains. It cannot function without them. But to see the pattern is to step outside of it.

    That step—quiet, diagnostic, and unglamorous—is the beginning of liberation.


    The Last Role

    In the end, Bardot played her final role without ever stepping on stage: the mirror in which two civilizations saw only themselves.

    To the West’s progressive conscience, she reflected the dangers of nostalgia and exclusion.
    To the nationalist conscience, she reflected the dignity of resistance.
    To the awakened observer, she reflected the mechanism of projection itself—the endless swapping of idols and demons that keeps the spectacle alive.

    And somewhere beyond those mirrors, a woman in her nineties fed stray animals and refused interviews. That may be the truest image of all.

    Replies: @Che Guava, @Dumbo, @Dumbo

  • Rumble link Bitchute link Update: I awoke this morning, Saturday, to the news that the US has bombed Caracas and other Venezuelan cities. E. Michael Jones and I will discuss this and other news on today’s False Flag Weekly News—watch at or after 8 pm Quds Time (1 pm Eastern). Kevin Barrett tells Press TV...
  • I remember that back in Chavez’s days a lot of Jews flew away from Venezuela. Quite a few of them went to the US. Perhaps this is their payback?

    On the other hand, apparently Maduro is partly Jewish too. So maybe this is Jew-on-Jew, or the whole operation has been staged in some way? Maduro gets some cozy retirement somewhere, and that “Nobel prize” (LOL) gets to play the part of president, while the US syphons all the oil “like a milk shake”.

  • Spencer was an avid reader of Nietzsche, particularly during the height of the alt-right movement. Immanuel Kant famously remarked that it was David Hume who awakened him from his “dogmatic slumber.” In a comparable sense, Spencer could be said to have attributed a similar intellectual awakening to Nietzsche. As Spencer himself recalled, “One could say...
  • @Anon
    Butthurt christian reheats e-drama from 10 years ago. Why was this published on Unz? Btw, Spencer is an Apollonian now. Maybe try writing an article about that.

    Replies: @Dumbo

    Who cares about what that fag is, or pretends to be?

    Why are most Unz commenters so retarded that they fall for each and every psyop?

    Is it because they are mostly retarded boomers?

  • This video is available on Rumble, Bitchute, Odysee, Telegram, and X. Brigitte Bardot, who died this week at age 91, was the dominant sex-star of the 1960s. However, in 1973, at age 39, at the pinnacle of her career, she gave it all up to devote herself to animal rights. This opened her eyes to...
  • The problem of modern France is really that their whole nation is based around the ideals of the “French Revolution” and the “Enlightenment” (The “light” here is Lucifer), so, what can you do? The seeds of destruction were planted long ago.

    Today they can’t even count how many foreigners live in their country, because of that “Egalité” crap, and the idea that “everyone can become French” as long as you speak the language and eat the right cheeses. And they have a Rothschild’s pet faggot married to a tranny as a supposed leader of the country…

    They should reject the whole thing and go back to monarchy, but fat chance of that happening. It will probably become a Muslim country soon, and they will kill and fuck sheep (not necessarily in that order) for their celebrations. Either that, or some African hellhole. A pity. It was a nice, a very nice country, and French women among the most beautiful and charming in the world.

    Brigitte Bardot was a feminist, so, in other ways she was also part of the problem, but then again, as I said France’s problems go way way back, so it’s not really her fault.

    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    @Dumbo

    True. It used to be that anyone could become French (or at least become a citizen of France) by serving in the Foreign Legion. Maybe that was too tough a path for immigrants...

  • Spencer was an avid reader of Nietzsche, particularly during the height of the alt-right movement. Immanuel Kant famously remarked that it was David Hume who awakened him from his “dogmatic slumber.” In a comparable sense, Spencer could be said to have attributed a similar intellectual awakening to Nietzsche. As Spencer himself recalled, “One could say...
  • @Mr. Crowley

    If life is a struggle for existence in which the fittest survive
     
    Lol

    Only problem is, in human societies its usually the unfittest or dysgenic that survive & proliferate over the fit.

    10 to 1 the 'Alt-right' was a Zionist-Fed operation from the start, hiring these various Christard or crypto-commie weirdos like Heimbach, Fuentes, Spencer et al to mislead the white youth.

    A.A.

    Replies: @notbe mk 2, @A_Hand_Hidden, @Dumbo, @Matt Lazarus, @Richard Gwyn, @Yukon Jack

    Why do you sign “A.A.”? Is it to give people the mistaken impression that you are Andrew Anglin, or does it simply mean “Alcoholic Anonymous”?

    • Replies: @Brazilian Brainrot
    @Dumbo

    He's trying to refer to Aleister Crowley's A.A.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A%E2%88%B4A%E2%88%B4

    Funny little troll, that guy. I bet the only thing he knows about Crowley is the Ozzy Osbourne song.

  • Spencer was an agent of the Powers that Be from the very start. Probably gay too. Just look at his faggy “Hitler youth” haircut. How stupid can people be?

    Darwinism is stupid as the basis of a moral “philosophy”. It doesn’t even make sense. What does “survival of the fittest” even mean? It’s a tautology. “Survival of those who are able to survive”.

    By that measure. the Africans are the “fittest” as they are the ones expanding and reproducing all over the world now, while white people don’t have children whither and die. Funnily enough, Darwin predicted exactly the opposite. So, not a great prophet.

    As for Nietzsche, he was many things, but not a “nihilist”. His “death of God” thing has been extremely misunderstood. Also, he criticized Christianity but, far from being an anti-semite, he actually defended the Jews. So he also must be taken with a huge grain of salt.

    Luckily, atheism and Darwinism and the whole edifice of modernity are on its way out. Religion will come back., one way or another. It’s the only chance white people have, to be honest. They rejected God and a metaphysical view of life beyond materialism and thought they could change human nature by social engineering, and this is the price they pay. “The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return.”

    • Agree: Mr. Biff
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Dumbo

    "Luckily, atheism and Darwinism and the whole edifice of modernity are on its way out. Religion will come back., one way or another."

    All of these "doctrines" are totally insane.

    It appears homo sapiens is doomed to believe in utter nonsense--of a million different kinds.

    The masses are finally beginning to notice everybody is lying because the "leaders" of each belief system are getting dumber and dumber.

    I would not be surprised if in a thousand years the most common political theory/religion bowed to statues of Unicorns and executed anyone who dared hint they might not exist.

    , @Commentator Mike
    @Dumbo


    Just look at his faggy “Hitler youth” haircut. How stupid can people be?
     
    That haircut was quite popular with many White football players. At one time, even Christiano Ronaldo, David Beckham, Olivier Giroud and others used to sport such Aryan Hitlerite haircuts.

    Replies: @Passing by

    , @Anonymous gi joe
    @Dumbo

    Whats rhe matter with hitler youth haircut you fu1ckupź!!

    , @europeasant
    @Dumbo

    "Religion will come back., one way or another"

    Maybe as a social movement but definitely not as a belief in the supernatural. Unless of course Idiocracy come to pass.

  • This video is available on Rumble, Bitchute, Odysee, Telegram, and X. Blacks in Maryland have just asked Santa — that is to say white people — for a nice Christmas present next year. The Maryland Lynching Truth and Reconciliation Commission just finished six years of work, and spent half a million dollars studying the awful,...
  • @TKK
    @Mr. Crowley

    This is Andrew Anglin aka Mr. Crowley.

    Replies: @Dumbo, @Mr. Crowley, @Che Guava

    Nah, he’s signing “AA” to make people think he’s Anglin, but I don’t think so.
    Crowley? As in Aleister?

  • Oh yeah, Jared is right. The problem is Blacks in power.
    Those damn Blacks controlling the Fed, the banks, Wall Street and Hollywood!
    But them Blacks do be sneaky and blame it on the Jews. They smart.

    • Replies: @Corrupt
    @Dumbo

    Please. Every city with black leaders has a serious corruption problem. EVERY SINGLE ONE!

    Replies: @Truth, @ServesyouallWhite

  • In response to the rise of the Groypers, Vivek Ramaswamy, wrote an NYT op-ed on American identity. Vivek defines being an American as those who “believe in the rule of law, in freedom of conscience and freedom of expression, in colorblind meritocracy, in the U.S. Constitution, in the American dream, and if you are a...
  • @Sir Jacob Rees-Dogg
    Steve Sailer's shabbosity is a sight to behold:

    *My theory, on the other hand (one that seldom is mentioned in public) is that Jews are, indeed, relatively rich, powerful, and, especially, influential per capita. So, all else being equal, you’d prefer to have more of them on your side than on the other side.

    Hence, it’s self-destructively stupid for the right half of the political spectrum to obnoxiously screw with Jews like Fuentes does, particularly when Jews have been trending in your direction since 10/7/2023 because the left has been acting so hostile toward Jewish interests that, finally, more Jews are waking up to notice that Wokeness isn’t good for the Jews, that there isn’t a special carve-out to protect Jews from being counted as white by anti-white DEI programs.*

    I'd ask Sailer(witz), how has being super philosemitic to appease the all-powerful jews and get them to be less subversive worked out for Whites so far?

    We have a pretty good historical track record of White philosemitism accomplishing the opposite: jews acting even jewier and more anti-White.

    Sucking up to jews has never, NOT ONCE, resulted in a genuine change of heart by jews toward their White hosts. All it does is encourage jews to exploit their gullible goyium marks. Sure, jews will cozy up to right-wing Whites when the jews need their support to beat back left-wing and moslem enemies of Israel, but as soon as the tactical alliance of convenience has served its purpose for the zionist jews, the secular jews go right back to undermining White culture and demonizing White racialism.

    The only times in history when jews have been successfully persuaded to back off their anti-White spite is when Whites actively and openly opposed them.

    Sailer knows this. He is not that dumb. He may be that cowardly and fearful though. Which would put him in the company of a lot of good goys handsomely rewarded for their Unnoticing.

    stevesailer.net/p/are-jews-influential

    Replies: @Dumbo

    Well, there’s a good possibility that Sailer may be a Jew himself. And if not, he’s an Anglophile, which means a Judeophile, i.e. someone like Derbyshire who has a similar perspective.

    Now, I’m a moderate on the so-called Jewish question — I don’t think ALL Jews are bad ALL the time, and there are some Jews that I even like. Their problem is not as individuals but as a group, because of their “religion” (it’s not really a religion, it’s more a cult/mafia thing).

    But yeah, trying to suck up to people who behave badly so that they behave better has rarely worked, not with Jews, nor with anyone else.

    • Troll: Corvinus
    • Replies: @Vinnyvette
    @Dumbo

    Sailer posse going at it like the good old days. 😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • Matt Walsh can’t reject an invitation by Tucker Carlson. He also can’t take a legitimate position on the Jews and Israel, because he works for Little Benny the Big Man. It’s a funny situation for Tucker, because he can just call this guy up whenever he wants and straight-up rat hole him. This week, Walsh...
  • Merry Christmas to all.

  • The narrative that Donald Trump represents a revolutionary populist disruption of American politics has become conventional wisdom among political commentators. Yet this characterization crumbles under scrutiny. A comprehensive examination of Trump’s actual policy achievements reveals not a populist insurgent championing working-class Americans against entrenched elites, but rather a conventional Republican administration advancing standard conservative priorities...
  • @Ambrose Kane
    @Anonymous534

    "Yet the Biden admin went along with the hoax for some reason" - Oh? Just "for some reason," eh? And what reason was that? How would going along with a faked assassination attempt benefit the Biden administration?

    And if it were "hoax" that might reveal what a phony Trump was, why didn't the Biden administration or those orchestrating the Kamala Harris presidential campaign expose it? Do you really believe that such a cover-up would not have been leaked by the Biden or Harris folks?

    You essentially assert that Jews or Israel wanted the democrats to go along with the hoax because they wanted Trump in office. What proof do you have of this?

    Moreover, Biden was completely pro-Israel and favored a constant flow of taxpayer money going to the state of Israel. Biden proudly referred to himself as a Zionist as well.

    And why has no one from the former Biden administration conceded that they knew the assassination was a hoax and that they were ordered or compelled in some way to go along with it for a Trump presidential victory?

    Your theory sounds good only if one doesn't require proof, or require follow-up questions that run deeper than surface level inquiries.

    Replies: @Same old same old, @Dumbo, @Che Guava, @anon

    Holy smokes. Can’t you see? They control both sides. “Republican”, “Democrats”, “Trump”, “Biden”, it’s all puppet theatre for the masses. It’s Jews all the way to the bottom.

    Of course the “assassination attempt” was fake, and both sides knew it, and they don’t care. Because they are really the same side. They are also just playing a part in this comedy. It’s all fiction.

    • Agree: Bro43rd, Yoda1881, Madbadger
    • Replies: @Getaclue
    @Dumbo

    Dead fireman disagrees-comment is beyond stupid ofc

    Replies: @Bro43rd

    , @Brad Anbro
    @Dumbo

    I completely agree with your observations. BOTH the national Democratic and Republican parties are owned lock, stock and barrel by the Big Money Interests. Persons L. Fletcher Prouty referred to as The Secret Team."

    Thank you.

  • In response to the rise of the Groypers, Vivek Ramaswamy, wrote an NYT op-ed on American identity. Vivek defines being an American as those who “believe in the rule of law, in freedom of conscience and freedom of expression, in colorblind meritocracy, in the U.S. Constitution, in the American dream, and if you are a...
  • Well, I guess this despicable Hindu street-pooper is right in a way, what is an “American”? You could say: the descendants of the British colonizers. But not really. It was a mixed nation with globalizing Freemason ideals from the beginning. A “melting pot of the European races”, as a Jew once put it. Then it naturally became a “melting pot” of non-European races too. (Are Jews American? I guess so, more than anyone else. It’s their country and always was). Still, when it was majority white you could say it had some kind of identity. Now, no longer. It’s just a free-for-all. As they say, America is a business, not a country.

  • Last week I'd published an article noting the considerable similarities between the reign of the notorious Roman Emperor Caligula and the second term of our own President Donald Trump. According to the ancient sources, Caligula had best been known for proclaiming himself a living god and for declaring that he would appoint his horse to...
  • @White cheese
    @Dumbo

    Why would Europe go to war and with whom?

    Replies: @Dumbo

    Civil war. Internal wars among the different groups now living in many European countries. for instance, in France, Arabs vs French. Of course, it is possible that the ethnic French will be too old to fight or just not bother, so the war will be Arabs vs Kurds vs Africans. Honestly, I have no idea. I just know that multiculturalism doesn’t work, so it ends either with ethnic conflict or with people migrating en masse and new borders being drawn. At best, it becomes like Latin America, the borders remain and there’s not a civil war, just lots and lots of crime, and cartels or terrorists organizations creating violence all the time.

    • Replies: @NobodyImportant
    @Dumbo

    And that's what sucks, Europeans should just deal with the leadership. Get rid of them and then install someone who gives a shit about Europe. It's not that easy to invade places like China, because the Chinese gov wouldn't tolerate an invasion. Europeans put up with it because they've become weak, stupid, scared, and defeated. I don't think any of these people bother to ask if they enjoy living under these shit conditions that have been created. Take Sweden for example, it use to be a clean, safe, and beautiful place even though the feminist trash there was bad enough. But then they imported all these people from everywhere else, and now they have all kinds of gang warfare, Grenade attacks, the type of shit you hear about in places like Mexico involving Cartels. And just a year or so ago over in Ecuador a gang of terrorist took over a news station and they also had explosives. They held the whole place hostage. I'm beginning to think people are just bored of safe and peaceful environments and can't get aroused unless they are surrounded by violence and their lives being threaten 24/7.

  • American democracy has devolved into a humiliation ritual in which we are expected to pledge support for people who hate us so they can steal our property, molest our children, and punish us for talking about their crimes. In election after election we are pressured to declare allegiance to one morally bankrupt criminal, simply because...
  • I suppose Helen of Destroy’s title is taken from this song by the Dead Kennedys. The name of the band is a propos, I am sure JFK and all the other Kennedys eons ago also had similar sex parties. It’s been happening for a while…

    p.s. Not that it matters, but I just found out in Wiki that Jello Biafra was at least 1/8 Jewish.

  • @Alanchik
    Helen Buyniski’s recent Unz Review article, “Sexual Blackmail Makes the World Go Round,” may be remembered as the first moment when the vocabulary of metaphysics quietly slipped into mainstream political journalism. Her deliberate use of the term “loosh” signals far more than literary flair; it marks a threshold between two explanatory paradigms—one material, the other energetic.

    For decades, political analysts have described corruption in the language of economics, ideology, or psychology. Buyniski goes deeper. She outlines a system sustained not merely by money or policy, but by humiliation and complicity—rituals that drain vitality from the populace and feed the hierarchy that rules them. That description echoes a concept long known in esoteric thought: that human emotion, especially fear and shame, can be harvested as an energy source. Monroe called it “loosh.” In modern Gnostic terms, it is the psychic fuel that powers the overlay—the parasitic control-field superimposed upon living reality.

    The Epstein network she invokes functions, therefore, not just as a political scandal but as a ritual engine. Blackmail is its visible mechanism; energetic extraction is its hidden one. Participants are bound through mutual corruption, each layer compromised into silence while radiating despair and moral nausea to the collective field. The architecture is fractal: the same pattern repeats in institutions, media, and even the culture of public humiliation that passes for entertainment. In this sense, Buyniski has traced the energetic economy of empire—how the few sustain their illusion of dominion by inducing spiritual exhaustion in the many.

    Why does this matter? Because once a society begins to name the energetic dimension of its own enslavement, the spell weakens. To utter loosh in a political essay is to puncture the firewall of materialism that keeps citizens debating symptoms instead of systems. It invites readers to perceive that the problem is not only who controls government, but what feeds on human attention and emotion through that control. In metaphysical language, the parasite reveals itself through its hunger.

    That Unz Review, a publication grounded in political heterodoxy rather than mysticism, would print this term is a sign of cultural evolution. The distance between geopolitics and gnosis is narrowing. When analysts begin acknowledging energetic realities, the conversation shifts from scandal to structure—from outrage to understanding. The human psyche starts to perceive that it has been living within a managed frequency field, one calibrated to generate despair, division, and dependence.

    Buyniski may not have laid out a full metaphysical model, but she opened the door. Her essay performs the first act of naming, and naming has power. It turns what was occult—hidden—into the visible. The next step is to articulate the architecture behind the intuition: to show that “loosh harvesting” is not a fringe metaphor but the energetic counterpart of economic exploitation and psychological warfare.

    Those who have mapped that structure call it the overlay—a self-sustaining code of control that feeds on polarity and emotional discharge. The antidote is not rebellion within the system but withdrawal of consent and energetic attention. When awareness replaces reaction, the loosh supply dwindles, and the overlay begins to collapse under its own starvation.

    Buyniski’s choice of a single word therefore carries prophetic weight. It suggests that political truth and metaphysical truth are converging, that the walls between journalism, psychology, and esotericism are dissolving. In an age of revelation, even a word can be a portal.

    Perhaps this is how awakening begins: not with new doctrines, but with familiar voices daring to name the unseen.

    Replies: @Dumbo, @Simon D, @Alanchik, @Emil Nikola Richard, @QCIC

    that human emotion, especially fear and shame, can be harvested as an energy source. Monroe called it “loosh.” In modern Gnostic terms, it is the psychic fuel that powers the overlay—the parasitic control-field superimposed upon living reality.

    I had never heard the word before, but I am quite sure that the idea of entities feeding on certain emotions, mostly negative emotions, is much more ancient. Devils feeding on pain and vice, etc. In the case of the “elites”, they probably see it as the source of their power. That’s why they keep doing it.

  • @Low-carb Political Movement
    Dear friends Read this article about why I’ve become a nihilist-pessimist and why I’ve decided to stop supporting Democrats, Republicans, The Green Party, Bernie Sanders, and governments—whether right-wing, progressive centrists, or left-wing. I believe humans are naturally evil, and as the anarchist Bakunin said, if you give power and wealth to even the most honest revolutionary, they will eventually turn into a tyrant. I think it might not be a bad idea to create a political system led by a scientifically programmed, neutral, democratic artificial intelligence supercomputer government.

    Read this article about Noam Chomsky’s connection, defense, and support for Jeffrey Epstein. I also came across information suggesting that Jeffrey Sachs was on Epstein’s email list of people invited to Epstein Island.

    I thought Chomsky was a saint, this is crazy !!

    Chomsky's friendship with Epstein speaks volumes about progressive politics
    By: Kavita Krishnan | Sunday, 12/21/2025 11:27 AM | Printable version
    Source of article (translated from spanish to english): https://www.aporrea.org/ddhh/a347950.html


    "I've met [all] kinds of people, even real war criminals. I don't regret meeting any of them." This was the belligerent response of the well-known intellectual Noam Chomsky, in 2023, to a newspaper's question about his relations with Jeffrey Epstein 1. More recently, Epstein's emails reveal that he maintained a close friendship with Chomsky and his wife 2.

    Of particular interest is Chomsky's written testimony (undated, but not earlier than 2017) for Epstein, where he calls their friendship, which lasted six years, an "interesting" and "fruitful" experience thanks to Epstein's open-mindedness and intellectual capacity and says that "Jeffrey has been able to organize repeatedly, sometimes on the fly, very productive meetings with leading figures in science and mathematics, as well as in world politics, people whose work and activity I knew, although I had never expected to meet them personally."

    Andrew Mountbatten's infamous Newsnight interview was asked in Windsor 3 if in retrospect, knowing that Epstein was a pedophile and sexual predator, he felt "guilt, regret or shame" about his friendship with Epstein. No, he said, "and the reason is that the people I met and the opportunity I had to learn from him and through him were really very useful to me... (which) gave truly beneficial results in matters that have nothing to do with (his crimes)."

    Both Chomsky and Andrew say they don't regret being friends with Epstein because through him they were able to meet interesting and important people.

    Andrew faces the accusation of having raped a minor provided to him by Ghislaine Maxwell 4 and Epstein. I must stress at this point that meeting or meeting with Epstein does not in any way imply that Chomsky was a co-participant in his crimes against girls and women. I do not suggest that he is guilty by association nor am I interested in catching him in a resignation. But for me the question is this: What does Chomsky's relationship with Epstein tell us about whether victims of sexual assault matter to us from the standpoint of our politics, of left-wing and progressive politics?

    By 2005, authorities had already begun investigating the allegations of 36 minors, one of whom was as young as 14 years old, whom Epstein had pressured into giving him sexual massages and who had made them available to other men. A lot of evidence was presented to support the victims' claims and Epstein was eventually charged in 2008. charged with 60 federal crimes, enough to be sentenced to life in prison.

    However, Epstein, in an infamous sentence, received no more than a simple reprimand. He reached a favorable agreement by confessing to a minor crime, consisting of having asked a minor to prostitute herself, and spent 13 months in prison in an open regime, being released during the day and returning at night to the penitentiary. All this was the subject of extensive public debates and criticized in the mainstream media.

    In 2023, Chomsky explained why he and his wife befriended Epstein despite his conviction for sex crimes against age. "What was known about Jeffrey Epstein was that he had been convicted of a crime and had served the sentence," he said. "In accordance with current legal regulations in the United States, this is clean of dust and straw."

    Let's take a closer look.

    Chomsky is an icon of the left whose writings enlightened entire generations about the nature of power, the impunity of powerful people, and the propaganda that fabricates consensus with this systemic inequality, violence, and impunity. If working-class children complained about being recruited by a wealthy businessman to force them to do unhealthy and dangerous work, and the businessman managed to get away with it, would Chomsky say he was now clean of dust and chaff?

    However, the norms seem to change if the working-class children in question are girls, recruited and enslaved to prostitute themselves and not to work in a factory. In Chomsky's political world, these individual victims of sexual predation are invisible.

    The key term in Chomsky's testimony is "current legal regulations." What it implies is that the MeToo movement has altered the legality and that Chomsky's friendship with Epstein should not be judged according to this new feminist norm. But this is not true. Even police officers publicly condemned Epstein's pact with the prosecution, calling it a mockery of current standards of justice, as did most mainstream media commentators. Why did Chomsky willingly accept the criteria of the pact that had fallen to shameful levels by all accounts?

    In a 2008 interview, after admitting his guilt, Epstein used an incredible metaphor, which revealed how he viewed his actions and the "current legal regulations." He "compared himself to Gulliver shipwrecked among the little inhabitants of Lilliput," saying that "Gulliver's playful character had unintended consequences. That's the thing about wealth: it comes with unforeseen burdens and advantages."

    Recall that in his email to Epstein, Andrew said goodbye with the words "Play later." Epstein and his minions see pedophile predation as the fruit of a "playful character." Epstein himself considered himself special, authorized by his wealth to play with small people such as underage girls who are penniless or at the bottom of the social ladder. The current legal regulations are the work of small and narrow-minded people who cannot understand the culture of those who are much above their level.

    As a public intellectual, Chomsky considers himself a defender of "little people." However, she befriended Epstein and gave him her endorsement, but so far she has not spoken in support of the little victims. The fact that Chomsky expressed admiration for Epstein's ability to pick up the phone and immediately contact all manner of bigwigs is illustrative: didn't he really think that this ability, those connections, had something to do with the mildness of his punishment?

    Why did Chomsky even write the aforementioned testimony in favor of Epstein, addressed to "whoever may be interested"? We know that Epstein launched a major public relations campaign to rehabilitate his image after pleading guilty to the crime of sexual abuse of minors. Part of that campaign included donations to universities and meetings with intellectuals and scientists, who contributed to washing its tarnished image. Did Chomsky write his testimony at Epstein's request as a contribution to his public relations campaign? Chomsky wrote the testimony in his capacity as a public figure: he now has a duty to explain to the public why he did it.

    The problem is that Chomsky is no exception. Here in India, I have just read glowing reviews of a staging by Mahmud Faruqui in Dastan-e-Ret-Samadhi, an adaptation of the Hindi-written novel Ret Samadhi (for which the writer and translator won the Booker Prize). Faruqui was once convicted of rape and his sentence was overturned by a higher court.

    The judge who acquitted him accepted the conclusions of the court that convicted him, giving credibility to the victim's statement and the fact that he had said "no". According to the spirit and letter of the current legislation, this is rape, period. However, the judge created a new legal concept, softening the current legal regulations to declare acquittal: a "no undecided", he ruled, "can mean a yes".

    The very expression of "not undecided" reminds us that the victim said no, which shows that she was in fact sexually violated against her will. Progressive friends of mine have even told me that "he has been acquitted, so he is innocent, so why should we pillory him, we cannot punish him in life". To each of them I say that they are free to criticize or applaud Faruqui, but from every point of view every time they praise him they corroborate and propagate the motto of "an undecided no is a yes." Like Chomsky, you too are delighted to approve of the most grotesque and absurd mockery of legal norms.

    The judge of the "undecided no" applied more demanding criteria to the no of an educated woman: it was up to her to express the no with the necessary emphatic force for the man to understand it. Instead, he applied a very lax criterion to the man: despite his mastery of language, literature, the performing arts and cinema, that man could not understand that no is no. You can't expect him to ask the woman if he had any doubts: you said no, do you want me to stop?

    Chomsky was dazzled by Epstein and another of the guests at his table, the "great artist" Woody Allen (also accused of sexual abuse by his own daughter when she was little). Indian literary and cultural progressives are dazzled by the art of man, with his fig leaf of the "not indecisive".

    If you perceive accusations of sexual assault against a man as irrelevant to your political judgment of his intellect, his art, and his ideas, you are the opposite of progressive. The rules have advanced and you'd do better to catch up or you'll miss the boat.



    Kavita Krishnan is a feminist activist and writer

    Replies: @Anonymous534, @Dumbo

    Read this article about Noam Chomsky’s connection, defense, and support for Jeffrey Epstein. I also came across information suggesting that Jeffrey Sachs was on Epstein’s email list of people invited to Epstein Island.

    What’s the surprise? All three are Jewish, of course they hang out together.

    I think it might not be a bad idea to create a political system led by a scientifically programmed, neutral, democratic artificial intelligence supercomputer government.

    Er… Who do you think is going to program that “neutral”, “democratic” Big Bot???

  • Hey trollface, people, even rich people, don’t socialize all in the same circles (although, granted, their circles are both more exclusive and more international). Yet very different people from very different occupations (arts, politics, tech) gravitated towards the same parties of this guy who (at least in theory) was basically a Nobody. I mean, he was not famous himself, and no one knows how he made his supposed fortune. The conclusion is not hard to reach, he was a pimp that offered the best sex parties for the jet set, but at a price to pay later. Whether people knew the “price” is not clear, but I am fairly certain they knew very well, and they knew they were being recorded while “socializing” (sic) as well. I’m only surprised that they “socialized” with women, I’m sure a large part of them are gay and prefer boys or trans. Maybe that part is yet to surface.

    • Replies: @Trinity
    @Dumbo

    Well boinking a 13-14 year old girl is borderline gay. Imagine some girl of 17 (Cue: I Saw Her Standing There by The Beatles) waiting to have sex with some wrinkly ass old fart like Dershowitz or Chomsky? Would she have to lube up? No normal 17 year old boy could get an erection with some 60 year old lady unless she aged like Raquel Welch. Remember when New England Patriots owner, another kike, Robert Kraft, was caught in some Chink Massage Parlor in Florida. You have all this money and you go to some massage parlor instead of hiring high end escorts to meet you at your home or hotel. These kikes are pretty stupid actually. Remember Pee Wee Herman aka Paul Reubens, he was caught jerking off in a porn theater in Florida as well. Damn, dumbass, this was back in the VCR days, rent a tape, go home and get in touch with the unemployed in private where you can’t be arrested. lol. Dumb kike.

    Replies: @Felpudinho

  • Last week I'd published an article noting the considerable similarities between the reign of the notorious Roman Emperor Caligula and the second term of our own President Donald Trump. According to the ancient sources, Caligula had best been known for proclaiming himself a living god and for declaring that he would appoint his horse to...
  • However, Hispanics, Asians, and blacks together now constitute more 40% of the American population.

    And this, gentlemen, is how you go from “they are just a few, it would be inhuman to deport them” to “there are too many people to deport”…

    However, Trump’s deportation policy is just theatrics.

    I don’t really think there is a solution to this mess. I doubt mass deportations at the level needed will happen (and deportations won’t be enough, you would also need a reversal of the negative birth rate of the white population).

    Probably at some point there will be a big war and a reorganization of borders along new ethnic lines, both in the US/Canada and in Europe.

    • Replies: @White cheese
    @Dumbo

    Why would Europe go to war and with whom?

    Replies: @Dumbo

  • American democracy has devolved into a humiliation ritual in which we are expected to pledge support for people who hate us so they can steal our property, molest our children, and punish us for talking about their crimes. In election after election we are pressured to declare allegiance to one morally bankrupt criminal, simply because...
  • @QCIC
    Good article.

    I see the Epstein activities as an initiation ritual more than a blackmail process. I think most of the big fish involved knew exactly what was going on and enthusiastically went along to gain access to greater levels of power. Most of these guys were self-evidently too worldly (being grade-A creeps already) to be caught in a very visible honey pot trap. This may seem like a fine point, but presenting the situation as an entrapment gives the participants some sort of weak excuse for their transgressions. On the other hand, showing it as a voluntary initiation rite clarifies how bad these people really are.

    I suspect the unspoken truth is that Epstein was more about Pizzagate-style rituals including much younger female AND male victims and nightmare crimes up to and including human sacrifice. They don't need an ersatz temple on a secure island enclave to offer sex with young girls who have been trafficked, this probably happens in every large city in the US. I assume one of the goals of the people behind this nightmare is to once again be able to perform Jewish and other blood rituals in plain sight without fear of retribution. The effective suppression of Pizzagate suggests we may already be there.

    Replies: @Dumbo, @Anon, @Robert Dolan

    It’s a ritual alright, but not necessarily “initiation”. Clinton was already U.S. president, how higher can you get? I don’t think it was exactly blackmail either, but more exactly voluntary blackmail. They knew they were being recorded.

    Probably, these people in the so-called elite voluntarily submit to such procedures to keep being part of the group and being promoted. They have their fun, the catch is that if you leave… Well, you can’t leave. Or else.

    I think this explains the huge amount of famous people that were connected through Epstein/Ghislaine. Clinton, Trump, Gates, Woody Allen, Mick Jagger, hell, even David Copperfield. It’s almost a who’s who of the rich and famous.

    This was also not just a random personal thing, but possibly organized by CIA or some such agency. Ghislaine’s father, Robert Maxwell, was a known Mossad spook. It follows that Ghislaine and Maxwell were too.

    What are the odds that this unknown creepy guy with a fortune that has no official explanation was “friends” with almost all famous people?

    • Replies: @Gvaltar
    @Dumbo


    guy with a fortune that has no official explanation was “friends” with almost all famous people?
     
    People with fortunes, famous people socialize?
  • Matt Walsh can’t reject an invitation by Tucker Carlson. He also can’t take a legitimate position on the Jews and Israel, because he works for Little Benny the Big Man. It’s a funny situation for Tucker, because he can just call this guy up whenever he wants and straight-up rat hole him. This week, Walsh...
  • But South Park managed to hype themselves with hatred against the show, and I was interested to see where they went with it. It was indeed horrible. It’s all about Trump. Before this season, they’d signed a deal for $1.5 billion for 50 episodes, which averages out to about $1.3 million per minute. Good work if you can get it.

    South Park was a thing back in the 90s, or early 2000s, or whenever it was it came out, but I can’t believe it still exists and some people still watch it. Then again, it seems even the Simpsons, which stopped being funny in the late 90s, are still being produced and some people watch it. Very few creators have the dignity (or the talent) of a Bill Watterson, to stop at exactly the right time.

    Anyway… it is indeed amazing that the creators of such crap are paid so much. But then again, they are Jewish. Or at least one of them is. Their cartoons became increasingly disgusting and sick until they were simply mental torture.

    I haven’t fully read the article, I just wanted to comment on that.

    • Replies: @Anonomys
    @Dumbo

    The eventuality of a given phenomenon becoming obscenely ludicrous and trite is a sure bet, when even a single jew is involved. This Tribe is perpetually “ jumping the shark.”

    IMO they did have a handful of effective episodes, years ago. ((They)) never know quite when to end a thing especially if there is the potential for further milking.

    These two don’t need money. They maintain their platform, as it allows them to continue to ridicule, mostly the White race.

  • I shouldn’t publish headlines like that. I’m in no way suicidal. And I don’t want to be “suicided.” Although I will say. This might be too doxy, but I’ll say it because I just asked the robot and this could have happened in any number of places: I got stung by a scorpion last week....
  • Oh dear. Maybe quitting the daily news was a bad idea? At least that gave you something to do. These “essays” about everything and nothing, and about how Nick is a fake (everyone and his mom knows that by now) I don’t know…

    But then again, I can relate. After a certain age and certain experiences, everything seems a bit pointless — especially writing about politics.

    In fact, I’m convinced that most people who write about politics do it just for the money. They are some kind of paid actors, really, paid to spew propaganda for one side or the other. No honest person would be in it. Also, you can’t really write well for money, you end up corrupted. I’m no fan of Schopenhauer, he was an annoying prick, and you can’t trust anyone who hates his own mother, but he has a good essay called “On Writing”, which is a bit about that.

    Ah, scorpion? Hum, so Andrew’s really in Africa? I would think Southeast Asia more likely. But maybe they have scorpions there too.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
    @Dumbo


    maybe they have scorpions there too.
     
    Indeed they do. I have even seen one there, but only once.

    Replies: @HarvardSqEddy

    , @Commentator Mike
    @Dumbo

    Maybe Anglin has been living in places where he doesn't have access to his substance/s of choice that made him hyperactive, reading and writing at xxx miles per hour. The long come down has sent him into a depression and a writer's block.

    We just keep on reading because it is Anglin although he isn't saying much.

    , @Che Guava
    @Dumbo

    To Dumbo and all other posters on this thread so far.

    This really proves my point about Mr. Crowley. On a new article, you post, get no feedback then the mods arrange the posts. In this case, it was me, Dumbo, and some stupid anon.

    I don't care about not getting first post. Think about the process. As far as we knew, you Dumbo, me, and the stupid anon all were the apparent first posters.

    As the system now works that way, Mr. Crowley was clearly being favoured as first post, since consistently being first. Less so lately, but still favoured. Why? I am not sure. Moderation here is largely automated, but there is a human factor.

    I have two theories on 'Mr. Crowley's' hit rate.

    Some moderator is doing it as a troll act, if so it's amusing but such a moderator should be kicked out of the role.

    The alternative, some moderator is Mr. Crowley's fellow satanist O.T.O. member. Unlikely.

    Very strange, I don't know why and how, but it sucks.

    Back to Andre's article, D.P.R.K. isn't really a communist nation now, the core ideologies are Juche, meaning autonomy and self-reliance, and 'military first'. I know how to say it in Japanese, but forget the Korean.

    They certainly are still making great propaganda posters and stern television broadcasts.

    Andre is too much of a degenerate to ever be allowed to live there, although I'm sure he'd be welcome to visit.

    Replies: @Commentator Mike

  • [A shorter version of this article was published as ‘Osama bin Laden’s Secret Weapon: Economic Literacy’ on 2/14/2025 at the Ludwig von Mises’ ‘Mises Wire’ publication. Article can also be listened here.] Future historians will one day likely recognize Osama bin Laden as the greatest military leader of all time. With minimal resources or technology,...
  • The economic argument aside, Obama, I mean, Osama was an obvious CIA agent and actor. He had nothing to do with 911 or any of the wars in Afghanistan. He was just a scary face. He was obviously not killed by American soldiers, much less “buried in the sea” (sic). By that time he had probably died a long time ago. He was possibly Jewish too (Laden = Ledeen?). But even if he wasn’t, he was just an actor.

    As for military spending, that’s a feature, not a bug. The author has switched cause and consequence. Wars are created for military spending, not the other way around. Just look at the Ukraine, or the U.S. war in Afghanistan in itself: 20 years!!! The wars continue as long as there’s a profit to be made.

  • Many readers have asked what China actually looks like for those who haven’t been there. Lots have been said about China’s rise in manufacturing, technology, and science. Everyone has heard that the longest high-speed rails, the busiest ports, the biggest dams, and the tallest bridges are in China. But what does China look like physically?...
  • China may be the future, but I prefer the past. Historical European towns are the most aesthetically pleasing cities that the human mind has conceived. Too bad many of those are dying or being overtaken by diversity (same thing).

    As for modern megacities, good luck to China, but no, thank you.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
    @Dumbo


    Historical European towns are the most aesthetically pleasing cities that the human mind has conceived.
     
    Just because you have been to European historical towns, but not those elsewhere, does not mean they do not exist....The assumptions you guys make.

    Just because you see modern cities in China does not mean historical towns do not exist there.....The assumptions you guys make.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfZYWdr8mms

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ye5fpRPw5pk

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDtE-5IxLvY

    Replies: @mulga mumblebrain, @AnonAnton

  • My Substack account got suspended for a couple of days. My home page showed this message “We’ve removed your publication from public view due to a violation of Substack’s Spam & Phishing policy”. I petitioned and Substack replied there was some “glitch” resulting in a wrongful suspension. Since my posts are hardly extremist by Substack’s...
  • I never read the articles by this Hua Bin guy because they sound as if written by AI (and maybe they are) and because I am not a fan of Chinese triumphalism, but… The topic is interesting.

    My impression is that the most high trust society in Asia is Japan. They have their issues, too, of course, but they are high-trust. I don’t see why they don’t appear near the top in this list here, they usually are.

    The Chinese are more of a mixed bag. It seems that they don’t have a great image in places like Vietnam, etc. They are seen as pushy and mercantilist. Le Happy Merchant in Asian version, I guess?

    That said, my experience with Chinese migrants in the West has been mostly positive. They are hard workers and they are actually helpful when they can. They may never learn the local language very well, but they know how to provide for themselves without becoming a nuisance to the natives as almost all other non-white migrants. Including the annoying Indians.

    China has become a cashless society since the early 2010s. Mobile payment is prevalent and few carry cash anymore. Pickpockets and robberies barely exist as a result.

    But see, this technocracy stuff is one of the reasons I don’t trust or like China as much as other people. I’m not a great fan “AI” stuff, much less of “digital cash only”. I suppose it may have its uses, but cash is good too. Digital cash is too easily taken away from you.

    I mean, everything digital is not really yours. Years ago I had an Amazon account where I published a few books, then I guess one of the books were not to their liking, I don’t really know why as they never explained, they simply deleted my account and all of its content. They never even paid the balance they owed. They said the ToS allowed them to do that. The same or worse with JewTube, who is known for deleting accounts without explanation.

    So, basically, if it’s digital and just resting on a server somewhere you don’t really own it, and the same is true of digital cash. See how people had their PayPal or even their bank accounts blocked for being “bad persons” on the Internet, even in the West. Couldn’t it happen in China?

    • Replies: @antibeast
    @Dumbo

    You’re barking up the wrong tree. Digital cash is not new at all as the banking system has already implemented electronic payments decades ago. The only difference this time around is that consumers now carry a computer in their pockets in the form of smartphones which they can now use to make payments over the internet. Those mobile payments are then deducted from their bank accounts in real time as electronic transactions instead of using POS terminals reading their debit cards. The fact is that banks can always seize your funds as long as you have deposit accounts with them, regardless of whatever payment method you choose for conducting cash transactions such as withdrawing cash from your bank account or using a debit card/mobile app to pay for your purchases.

    , @Gvaltar
    @Dumbo


    the most high trust society in Asia is Japan.
     
    According to:

    unz.com / substackcdn.com

    it's 34% vs China at 63%.
  • Just let it happen. Don’t fear. Here’s the deal, my folksy folks: meme articles are the most popular articles. So now I’m slipping stuff I think is important into meme articles. Of course, you can click “page down” a few times if you don’t care about these materials. But I advise at least trying this...
  • This announcement should actually be that this is a bigger bubble than the dot com one by a lot, and though I know nothing about economics, I think when it pops it is going to be something significantly worse than the 2008 crisis. I hear different numbers, but a huge percentage of this economy is now dumb AI speculation, all based on this AGI bullshit. I have no idea how that is going to affect crypto, which is the only thing I care about.

    As for the AI bubble. It’s obviously a bubble.

    AI can’t deliver any of its promises, except maybe “end all jobs” and “create a prison planet” — but how do these things “help the economy”? And if all AI can really deliver are slightly more realistic sex chatbots, or even dumber, uglier memes, that’s also a fail, so, bubble it is.

    But WHEN will it burst? Who knows. I’d say sometime next year. Probably next summer, or by the end of the year. It still has some gas left.

    What will happen to BTC? I suppose it will go down too. Unless people see it as an escape from the dollar crash and the gold market is too crowded. Who knows. But it will probably go down too.

    I suppose the best thing would be to invest in real estate. Or in physical gold. Well, if you have any money left. If you’re broke, I guess investing in canned food and a place in a bunker somewhere?

    Oh well. Let us hope.

    • Replies: @Emslander
    @Dumbo

    The AI bubble is crashing right now. It's starting on the metals futures markets. Anything used as a kind of collateral will crash first, because AI speculator fools will wait forever to get rid of their AI positions, thinking they will come back.

    Replies: @Mark G.

    , @Detroit Style Pizza
    @Dumbo

    Seems like the entire US economy is depending on NVIDIA computer gamer graphics card chips.

    That can't be good or healthy.

  • This essay constitutes the first installment in a series of debates between Kevin MacDonald and myself. As noted in Part 3 of my exchange with James Fetzer, which can be found here, we encourage readers to keep their “thinking caps” on, as the issues under discussion draw upon historical evidence, philosophical reasoning, and logical analysis....
  • There can’t be such a thing as a “evolutionary strategy”, as under its thesis, evolution is completely blind, and free will doesn’t exist.

    Also, yes, “might makes right” is its only core philosophy, so there is no way to blame the Jews in that case. They are just performing their “natural” role.

    Thank God I am not an “evolutionist”.

    • Replies: @Understory
    @Dumbo

    You may not be an "evolutionist," but you sure are a dumb ass.

  • Editor’s Note: This is an e-begging post. However, it also contains the first segment of my Tucker Carlson-Jim Bowman-Nick Fuentes 2028 analysis preview, which I think you will enjoy. If you are seriously poor, you can skip the e-begging section. The Tucker section is clearly marked. Though I do pray you will help us if...
  • @theRealHun
    Anglin is definitely jealous of Fuentes.

    Replies: @Dr. Rock, @Anonomys, @Linus, @Dumbo

    Jewalous of his money and fame, maybe (I don’t know). But otherwise, what’s to be jealous of?

    I think it’s more resentment and bitterness about the betrayal than jealousy.

    Fuentes is obviously an artificial creation, a manufactured personality. To Anglin’s credit, he supported Nick on his site for several years (I remember), until the self-called “cat-boy” started doing some weird stuff like talking to Fed Richard Spencer, leading people into traps such as January 6th, etc. So, I can’t blame Anglin for feeling somewhat betrayed by his younger disciple.

  • The klepto-nepotistic regime of Volodymyr Zelensky is circling the toilet bowl as yet another corruption scandal soils his good name and tarnishes Ukraine’s reputation for fighting on behalf of all Europeans for democratic values. The aptly named Operation Midas has brought to light an immense extortion racket worth 100 million dollars. Published photos show the...
  • The Ukraine is and was what it name says it was, a Borderland between Poland and Russia. Whether it should be an independent country or not is up for debate, I guess they have at least some historical grounds for it, especially if you consider it was once Khazaria, but the sad thing is, while having little to no difference from Russians — I mean, come on, they may have their own little idiosyncrasies but which are not so relevant to the outside world, and they are at least cousin peoples with the same origin, well, maybe except for the Jews who always live in their own world.

    But they could have been like, say, Belarus but they let themselves be used by Jews, Americans and Eurotrash as a battering ram against greater Russia. The objective is the same as always, to retake strategic Crimea, but they failed big this time.

    Another issue about the Ukraine, which makes it similar to Kosovo and other artificially created or NATO-supported “countries” (Kosovo is of course not a real country) is the insane amount of corruption and sleaziness that it has.

    The pre-war Ukraine was basically known for:

    -prostitution and export of prostitutes to Western Europe;

    -surrogacy (selling babies to international homosexual couples who would rape the children);

    -organ trafficking, probably mostly to Israel;

    -all kinds of shady deals with crooked Western politicians (see Burisma, etc.)

    -drug route to European markets;

    In this sense, it’s good to see it go. Anyone supporting the Ukraine is basically a supporter of such status quo of sleaze and corruption and wanted to keep it as a shady-deals, baby-selling, organ-selling industry for the West.

    By the way, I remember discussing once with an Ukrainian living abroad who was a rabid defensor of the Ukraine — turns out he worked with porn production and was an extremely sleazy person. (I don’t think he was Jewish, even though most porn production is Jewish,)

    Anyway, I may be biased as I don’t have a very positive image of Ukrainians, almost all the ones I met were somewhat trashy, while my contacts with Russians abroad have been somewhat better, even if Russians have their problems too.

    • Agree: wojtek
  • @raga10

    What Part of Ukraine Borders the North Atlantic, Anyway?
     
    The same part as in Italy, Greece or Turkey. Just like a country doesn't have to be in Europe to participate in Eurovision, it doesn't have to border northern Atlantic to be in NATO. Ukraine probably should've been allowed in, but it wasn't because spineless Euro nations didn't want to antagonize Russia ... and how did that work out for them?
    I can only hope that when "Russian Federation"* implodes we will be less magnanimous than we were after dissolution of Soviet Union because strength is the only thing those savages can understand and respect.

    *a made up country if there ever was one, with much less justification for existence than not only Hawai or Texas but also Ukraine.

    Replies: @kit walker, @Paul Greenwood, @Dumbo, @JR Foley

    There are many ignorant comments in the UR, but yours probably beats a record — so much ignorance concentrated in one brief comment! Paraphrasing what someone said of Lilian Hellmann, everything you wrote is stupid, including “the” and “a”.

  • Editor’s Note: This is an e-begging post. However, it also contains the first segment of my Tucker Carlson-Jim Bowman-Nick Fuentes 2028 analysis preview, which I think you will enjoy. If you are seriously poor, you can skip the e-begging section. The Tucker section is clearly marked. Though I do pray you will help us if...
  • @Anon
    @Dumbo

    The analogy is that Seinfeld was the main character. You really couldn't get that?
    You picked an appropriate screenname that's for sure.

    Replies: @Dumbo

    Who asked you? And your name is “Anon” because no one knows who your father is?

    Whatever! Bye!!!

  • @i'm not sure
    Proton mail, bless your heart. lol

    Bro, Fuentes is Seinfeld and you're just Kramer.

    Sure, Kramer was always my favorite, but come on man... there's no comparison.

    Replies: @Dumbo

    I don’t get the analogy here.. Seinfeld was always the least funny character in the series… His starting monologues were always lame (on purpose?) and he couldn’t act…

    I always thought he was unfunny on purpose to act as a foil for the others.

    Then again, Kramer burned himself after that comedy show where he said “nigger” too many times… So, maybe there’s the analogy with Anglin. While Seinfeld continued making shows (even if unfunny ones).

    I never had time for Fuentes, back then or now. I really don’t see the appeal of the guy. Actually he reminds me a bit of Zelensky, maybe because both seem to be on cocaine all the time. Only that the drug turns Zelensky into a whiny downer, and Fuentes, into a manic blabbermouth.

    • Agree: James J. O'Meara
    • Replies: @Anon
    @Dumbo

    The analogy is that Seinfeld was the main character. You really couldn't get that?
    You picked an appropriate screenname that's for sure.

    Replies: @Dumbo

  • Introduction (Unrelated to Main Article Content) The development of my TV show is at a bit of a standstill as I await my dear partner to acquire better internet access. We will begin doing a fake podcast soon, as I practice my ability to speak without constantly saying “um.” It’s a complex developmental journey for...
  • @Kevin Barrett
    @Eric135

    Well, I'm an expert on expatting to Morocco, not Spain, but I know Americans, Brits, and Moroccans who have settled in Spain, and some have definitely cut corners on the onerous rules and prices you cite. Some have gotten digital nomad visas. Others have married EU citizens (however virginal). As for housing prices, some Spanish rural areas are very cheap. There are even reports that Spain, like Italy, offers free houses in depopulated rural villages to those willing to fix them up.

    Replies: @Dumbo

    Sorry, we don’t want any more Muslims or, even worse, Americans in Spain/Italy/etc. They tend to ruin everything.

    Americans (and Brits) have ruined Florence and Ibiza, and that just as tourists.

    Imagine if masses of them decided to move permanently to Spain as residents and transform the places into California or New York. The horror, the horror. I think even the invasion by hordes of Muslims might be a less horrific destiny.

    What Spain needs is for Spanish people to have babies again. It might seem impossible, but just 60 years ago people in Southern Europe (when the countries were still actually Catholic) were having 7, 8 children. It can happen again.

    • Replies: @Eustace Tilley (not)
    @Dumbo

    "It can happen again."

    I salute your noble spirit. We are "on the same page".

    Logically, anything that happened in the past is possible; therefore, it can happen again. Christendom can forswear pornography, fornication, adultery, sodomy, and abortion. It can outlaw computers and all electric devices. It can return to the ox-drawn plough and the hand-powered loom. It can "give up the gun" (don't laugh: Japan did) and revert to the noble sword.

    The Europeans would be living in a real-life "Lord of the Rings" universe. I sincerely believe that they would be happier, healthier, and stronger. This is actually possible. 👉But their hearts are so corrupted that they cannot do it.👈

    "My heart is so hardened that I cannot repent." - Christopher Marlowe, "Doctor Faustus"

    , @Etruscan Film Star
    @Dumbo


    What Spain needs is for Spanish people to have babies again. It might seem impossible, but just 60 years ago people in Southern Europe (when the countries were still actually Catholic) were having 7, 8 children. It can happen again.
     
    An army of infants in the War of the Womb? That would be a dreadful disaster for Spanish quality of life. Maybe you'd be happier if you move to Africa:

    https://borgenproject.org/10-facts-about-overpopulation-in-africa/
    , @RadicalCenter
    @Dumbo

    When they convert to islam and adopt more traditional lifestyles, priorities, goals, and family structures, they will presumably produce and raise many more children. An observant traditional muslim Spain would tend to lead to a restored birthrate and a more vital, energetic population (much lower median age), just like an observant traditional christian Spain would.

    https://www.newageislam.com/islam-west/ghulam-ghaus-siddiqi-new-age-islam/faith-transition-thousands-native-spaniards-converting-islam/d/135454

    Too bad they’ll be inculcated with quranic drivel and irrelevant fables along with the ample good guidance, observations / aphorisms, and principles, but that’s true of the other junior “abrahamic” cult and its man-made “holy book” too.

    Replies: @John Johnson

  • @Kevin Barrett
    @Dumbo

    Well, you can lead a horse to Mediterranean water, but you can't make him swim ; - )

    Replies: @Dumbo

    I’m not sure if you are really a Muslim convert or just some sort of propagandist, and honestly I don’t really care, but race and culture are not religion and Mediterranean =/= Muslim.

    In fact, Mediterraneans are usually thought of as Greeks (Orthodox) and Spaniards/Portuguese and Italians (all Catholic), not North Africans. But even North Africans were Christian once.

    I don’t really have all that much against Muslims, as long as they stay in their countries, I just don’t want them invading Europe (again). Is that too much to ask? What’s wrong with Morocco, Syria, etc? You have nice beaches. Stay there.

    Will the Spanish have to start Reconquista again to expel the Saracens? (But I guess the Jews have got to go first, then as now).

  • @RadicalCenter
    @Dumbo

    For better or for worse, Spain looks like a country where roman catholicism is in collapse.
    Without drastic change, RCs will soon be a small minority of the populace.

    https://evangelicalfocus.com/europe/31366/the-decline-of-catholicism-in-spain-from-90-in-the-1970s-to-55-in-2025

    Adult Spaniards identifying as roman catholic
    90% in the 1970s
    55% today in 2025

    Adult Spaniards identifying as non-religious (atheist, agnostic, or simply unaffiliated)
    22% in 2002
    42% in 2024

    Children enrolled in voluntary catholic religion class at public schools
    81% in 1998-99
    44% in 2022-23

    Marriages done in rc church per rc rituals
    “almost all” in the 1970s
    76% in 2000
    18% in 2024

    Muslims are growing in Spain, up to nearly six percent in 2024, and “evangelical” christians another couple percent. Maybe Spain will enter a period like France is entering, with a large majority identifying either as Muslim or as non-religious. Some recent sources report that 10-11% of French citizens are Muslim. and 49% are non religious.

    Replies: @Dumbo

    Yeah, it’s a Leftist (“secular”) country today, it doesn’t mean they want to become Muslim.

    What is it with you Muslims wanting to invade everyone else’s countries, huh?

    Spain expelled all you guys once, it can still do it again. Of course, Leftists/Jews have to go first.

    Same old, same old.

    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    @Dumbo

    I’m not a muslim, man.

    Left one “abrahamic” cult, despite having loved ones and many other good people in it, and don’t plan to join one of the others — notwithstanding the many good people in the other two.

    Whatever you or I want, reality on the ground in Spain is that roman catholicism there is continuing a half-century-long dramatic decline. I don’t think that replacing it largely with atheism and probably moral relativism is likely to be good for Spain on balance. I’m uncomfortable with islam replacing it, but don’t feel a need to act like islam is uniquely evil or irrational, absurd, meanspirited, compared to the bible.

    , @John Johnson
    @Dumbo

    What is it with you Muslims wanting to invade everyone else’s countries, huh?

    Well after all of Muhammed's rules there isn't much left to do than pray or invade.

  • @Kevin Barrett
    In most Islamic and to a lesser extent (conservative/rural) Mediterranean cultures, female virginity is a big deal, because people are emotionally honest, and everyone knows that normal men don't want to marry non-virgins.

    One could solve the problems addressed in this article by embracing Islam and joining a Muslim community near the Mediterranean. Spain has quite a few, so you would only have to learn Spanish, an easy language, rather than Arabic, which is much harder. There you would no doubt find a virgin bride, a home that costs between 1/2 and 1/10th of an equivalent US home, the world's tastiest and healthiest food, and the world's best weather. There are spiritual benefits as well, but that's off-topic.

    Replies: @theRealHun, @Dumbo, @Eric135, @TKK, @Just-the-fact, @※, @QCIC, @Biff, @craicaassmofo

    Piss off, Spain is a Catholic country.

    WTF!! It’s all we needed! As if we didn’t have enough Muslims in the West!!

    Anyway, this is stupid advice and a stupid “solution”.

    Arabs in Spain talk Arabic among themselves, just as they do in Germany, France, etc. So you’d need to learn it anyway.

    Two, they won’t let their women just marry some random non-Arab speaking non-Muslim foreigner. And how would you get close to the women anyway?

    Plus, most of their women are ugly and fat. That’s why they use a burka. And they are not necessarily less consumerist or more modest than Western women (except for the hair stuff). Really, you see a lot of these Arabic women with a veil but Nike shoes and fake Gucci bags.

    Finally, due to mass tourism, houses in Spain are not cheap at all! Unless maybe you move to some Moroccan crime-ridden ghetto in the Raval, maybe. But even there, I don’t think so.

    Some solution!!!

    • Agree: Exile in Paradise
    • Troll: RadicalCenter
    • Replies: @Kevin Barrett
    @Dumbo

    Well, you can lead a horse to Mediterranean water, but you can't make him swim ; - )

    Replies: @Dumbo

    , @RadicalCenter
    @Dumbo

    For better or for worse, Spain looks like a country where roman catholicism is in collapse.
    Without drastic change, RCs will soon be a small minority of the populace.

    https://evangelicalfocus.com/europe/31366/the-decline-of-catholicism-in-spain-from-90-in-the-1970s-to-55-in-2025

    Adult Spaniards identifying as roman catholic
    90% in the 1970s
    55% today in 2025

    Adult Spaniards identifying as non-religious (atheist, agnostic, or simply unaffiliated)
    22% in 2002
    42% in 2024

    Children enrolled in voluntary catholic religion class at public schools
    81% in 1998-99
    44% in 2022-23

    Marriages done in rc church per rc rituals
    “almost all” in the 1970s
    76% in 2000
    18% in 2024

    Muslims are growing in Spain, up to nearly six percent in 2024, and “evangelical” christians another couple percent. Maybe Spain will enter a period like France is entering, with a large majority identifying either as Muslim or as non-religious. Some recent sources report that 10-11% of French citizens are Muslim. and 49% are non religious.

    Replies: @Dumbo

  • Good article. 50-year mortgage seems actually worse than just renting it. It’s just the illusion that you ill own something, some day. (But then, it already is, with property taxes and so on).

    Isn’t it funny that Covid policies basically decimated the small businesses and the middle class, while enriching the Bezos and Zuckerbergs of this world? A transfer of billions from poor to rich.

    But now, Trump’s policies such as crazy tariffs and “50-year mortgages” do the same, benefit the rich and the bankers, while destroying small businesses and the middle class.

    Some say, “tax the rich”, but that’s just silly. The rich — the (((rich))) ? — own the government, or vice-versa, anyway, it’s the same people, so they would simply be paying themselves with your own money, as they always do.

    As Anglin points at the end, we would need a complete restructure, the whole order needs to crash in order to be fixed.

    However, I think that this is more than just a social and political issue, it’s a, let’s say, spiritual issue. Until modernity/hedonism/consumerism and all its attendant evils are rejected, rejected by the people themselves, everyone will still be trapped in the same rat labyrinth, in the same “mouse utopia”.

    And, contrary to Anglin, I think it may also include rejecting robots/AI to some extent as well. Technology is not always good, in fact, in the last 30 yers or so it has been mostly bad. AI is mostly just a scam, anyway, it will never fulfill the techno-utopians fantasies.

    • Replies: @Figi
    @Dumbo

    Order out of chaos. Now we know who replaced Anglin.

    , @Kingsmeg
    @Dumbo


    Some say, “tax the rich”, but that’s just silly. The rich — the (((rich))) ? — own the government, or vice-versa, anyway, it’s the same people, so they would simply be paying themselves with your own money, as they always do.
     
    Eat the rich. It's the only way. It's not like we can nuke the whole thing from orbit and start over somewhere else. We either remain their slaves, or we remove them.

    Replies: @Eustace Tilley (not)

    , @Rev. Spooner
    @Dumbo

    All America needs to do is get rid of the jews who control power in America and that includes Donald Trump. Trump is totally a jewish puppet.
    Once the USA does that, it will be re-born as it was and should be.
    C'mon Americans, you can do it. The tide is turning, kick them out.
    Support the true Americans First and the First Amendment.

    , @Anymike
    @Dumbo

    But you do have the propsect of paying off your mortgage in cheap money. Saw it personally when I did home improvement marketing in the Seattle area in the early 2000s. Met any number of aging homeowners who I could tell were hanging on their high-end neighborhoods only because they were still in 2007 making a 1980s mortgage payment.

    Smarter heads might consider the possibility of selling out of a high priced market and moving to a low cost market. A lot of people don't want to move away from their children, grandchildren, relatives and other human connections though. Especially, people in the Pacific Northwest don't uproot themselves very much.

  • Firstly, this is apparently real: I saw that posted on Twitter, and thought it was edited. I mean, that is a long, long boo. But at least according to the AP, it is real. Maybe the AP will start posting AI slop at some point. But I don’t think they have yet. That is a...
  • Where’s Anglin’s new article about Trump’s “50 year mortgage”? That’s a good one.

  • Paul Kendal, writing for The Telegraph in Britain, reported that in 1941 a medical officer named Major Leo Skurnik received the Iron Cross from the German high command. Notably, Skurnik was Jewish. Kendal further observed that Skurnik was not an isolated case; more than three hundred Jews served on the German side when Finland—sharing a...
  • Or maybe, just maybe, Jews and “Nazis” were in cahoots?

    There are Jews in basically ALL political movements, so why not Nazism too? Of course they usually prefer the left and the bolsheviks, but they were among the fascists too. Probably playing and financing both sides, as they usually do.

    Today they are in the AfD and most “right-wing” parties in Europe, for instance. In “The Spider’s Web”, by Jewish author Joseph Roth, written before the war, we have a Jewish man who supports a right-wing nationalist in the hope of seeing war and the destruction of Europe. It’s all there.

    So the most obvious answer to the author’s question is that Jews were Nazis too, and the Holohoax was yet another false flag. Hitler himself was probably a “kike”, as several other elite Nazis were confirmed Jews, such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmuth_Wilberg

    Also, this old article about relatives of former Nazis somehow becoming Jewish Zionists is interesting:
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/aug/06/judaism.secondworldwar

    Perhaps Nazi Germany’s (and the war) real purpose was to provide the groundwork for the establishment of Israel?

  • Well, the latest of these incessant polls concerning the Nov. 4 election for the mayoralty of New York are in, having arrived Thursday, Oct. 30, and if the story has changed it is only for the better. A new Emerson College survey puts Zohran Mamdani, front runner from the start, 25 percentage points ahead of...
  • I know little about Mandani or his policies, and, not living in NY nor anywhere near, I don’t care. But I am not a fan of rent control policies in general. They led to abuse and distortion.

    That said, I guess whoever wins in NY is who gets the most rabbis on their side?

    https://twitter.com/ZohranKMamdani/status/1985106439728160937

    • Replies: @Bojangles
    @Dumbo

    What is this? A strategy session for pushing the human hacking genetic infection injection?

  • Author’s note: The caption “Entartete Musik” featured on this and other images means “degenerate music.” This along with greater condemnations of degenerate art were a prominent platform position of a certain political movement in the past. Some readers may recognize the stylized lettering from a certain progpaganda poster as well. The cultural milieu any individual...
  • I just perused the article — it’s way too long given its subject and it seems a bit of a waste of time to read so much about Katy Perry, a fake personality and fake musician who faked even a rocket trip.

    I don’t think anyone should waste so much time on such trite subjects.

    But a few of the pictures are interesting, especially that album cover of that “former Disney child star” (of course) promoting sexual degeneracy and race-mixing…

    Of course, if you really look for it there are even worse things. Contemporary music sold to teenage or pre-teenage girls is basically soft porn (in lyrics and visuals) mixed with satanic imagery. It’s really worse than you could possibly imagine.

    Looking back, surely there were also bad things in the 80s/90s when I grew up, but nothing as bad as there is today, both in terms of musical quality and lyrics and in terms of degeneracy. In fact, a lot of the music of the 80s/90s seems downright naive these days.

    • Agree: Nathan W
  • Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News link Jason Farago, who appears to be a Deep State propagandist and pro-UkroNazi culture warrior, just published a New York Times interactive photo-video piece headlined “How Lunar Photography Brought the Heavens Down to Earth.” Farago celebrates the alleged artistic genius of the Apollo moon photos, viewing them...
  • I didn’t have time to edit the previous commentary. Of course (if real) there would be a scientific value in a human landing on the moon. However, besides clowning around (and playing golf!) they didn’t do much, and all they brought back were a few “moon rocks”.

    Supposedly, because a few of those turned out to be fake, too.

    Here also a story about a “moon rock” given by president Nixon to a Dutch Museum that turned out to be just petrified wood (yes, from the Earth — there are no trees on the Moon).

    https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna32581790

  • Watch out, there’s nothing that “men of UNZ” [TM Alden] boomer readers hate more than being told that the Moon landings were fake, as it is considered the pinnacle of White Men’s Civilization (only it isn’t).

    I myself am neutral on the issue, although there are many valid doubts about the Moon project. I watched about half of Mazzucco’s documentary, he makes some good points, others, not so good. David McGowan’s book “Wagging the Moondoggie” is good too.

    Lately we found out we have been lied to about so many other events (9/11, Charlie Kirk, etc), so what if the Moon Landings were also not what we were told?

    But I tend to think it’s fake for a simpler reason — the only use of the Moon Landings was as a propaganda coup, to say “we won the space race”. It had no scientific or economic value, and in fact we never went there again. It was just a media thing.

    So, why risk the lives of men and zillions of dollars (and the real possibility of failure as the whole world watched) by taking the trouble to actually going to the Moon, when you could film it all here on Earth, and obtain the same or better results?

    It’s not as if anyone was on the Moon before (of after) and could compare.

    • Replies: @xcd
    @Dumbo

    the only use of the Moon Landings was as a propaganda coup

    For that matter, can anyone tell us what all those people have achieved all these years on the ISS?

    Replies: @※

    , @anarch0re
    @Dumbo

    McGowan lost his mind before he died. He also said the Boston Bombing was fake.

    "So, why risk the lives of men and zillions of dollars (and the real possibility of failure as the whole world watched) by taking the trouble to actually going to the Moon, when you could film it all here on Earth, and obtain the same or better results?"

    Because they had the technology built. It would have been more expensive to fake it than to just go.

  • The Russians are disappointed with Trump's policy towards Russia. They have long given up hoping to partner with the US in building a just world order, and they are now giving up the hope that they might be treated fairly. The last person in Russia (if not in the world) still hoping to get along...
  • @xyzxy
    Russia remains an enigma to the West. Look at Paul Craig Roberts. Actually on Putin's side, but having no clue as to what and why Putin does what he does.

    Somewhere, in Dostoevsky's Diary of a Writer, the great Russian author states that Westerners will never understand Russia, and Russians.

    In another passage he chides his compatriots for being responsible for at least half of Russia's problems. Which he identifies as coming from two sources. The first is Vodka. The second, Jews. Get rid of both, and Russia has a chance.

    Replies: @Rurik, @Dumbo

    what’s wrong with vodka?

    • LOL: Dumbo
    • Replies: @xyzxy
    @Rurik


    what’s wrong with vodka?
     
    If you are asking seriously, in context, we remember that Dostoevsky wrote his comment sometime around 1873. The author surveyed the lower class working/peasant landscape, observing wide-spread alcoholic drunkenness, along with all that goes along with intoxication. As if the will to live itself was being drowned out of the Russians.

    In fact, Solzhenitsyn (who had something of Dostoevsky's spirit) wrote it similarly. In his banned curiously unpublished in English, 200 Years Together. In addition, blaming Jews for much of the Russian alcohol trade.

    Replies: @Rurik

  • @xyzxy
    Russia remains an enigma to the West. Look at Paul Craig Roberts. Actually on Putin's side, but having no clue as to what and why Putin does what he does.

    Somewhere, in Dostoevsky's Diary of a Writer, the great Russian author states that Westerners will never understand Russia, and Russians.

    In another passage he chides his compatriots for being responsible for at least half of Russia's problems. Which he identifies as coming from two sources. The first is Vodka. The second, Jews. Get rid of both, and Russia has a chance.

    Replies: @Rurik, @Dumbo

    There is a chapter on that Diary of a Writer which is called “The Jewish Question” and is pretty interesting, to say the least. He’s not completely unsympathetic to the Jews, but he’s not blind either. That said, I don’t think he suggests that Jews should be expelled from Russia. In fact, I think he even argues for extending full rights to the Jews (which at the time had to reside in the Pale of Settlement), but is skeptical that it would work, with the Jews being, well, Jews.

    • Replies: @xyzxy
    @Dumbo

    Diary is an interesting text. Hard to come by in the West, in English, at a reasonable price. First, because of its length it has been split into volumes; secondly (one presumes) because of its politically charged commentary. There is however a 'samizdat' poorly formatted copy one can find floating around in ebook format, readable with only a little effort.

    The author is critical of errant behavior in general. Realizing as he did that if there is a problem with Jews, it can be traced to a reciprocal failing in ethnic Russians, who allow themselves to be so easily taken.

  • I wonder if First and Second World War were like this too… The Usual Suspect banging drums for a war that no one else wanted or cared for. Except for the Hohols, who have a constant chip on their shoulder an don’t want to be Russians or maybe even Slavs (I guess they think they are German), who cares if the Ukraine belongs to Russia or not?

    I mean, for decades the Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union, and no one cared. It didn’t make any difference to anyone in the West. Then it got independent and it was a mess — for them, it still didn’t make much difference in the West, except for those interested in traffic of sex slaves and body organs.

    Its best best was to chill and become like Belarus, an independent country but friends with Russia, if not to apply to be part of the Russian Federation. But no, they wanted to be part of the West/EU, just as the West was starting to unravel through immigration, consumerism, gay stuff, etc.

    Now the West is supporting the losing side in this war that interests NO ONE except certain politicians who profit from, I suppose, organs and sex slave traffic and other shady deals.

    And a war that could have ended years ago is prolonged until who knows when, and the Usual Suspects would be very glad if it became a true hot World War between NATO and Russia.

    But other than them, who cares? European countries have enough problems with brown migrants selling drugs on their parks, white people not reproducing and the economy going down the tubes.

    Who in his right mind would want a war on top of that?

    I would add that Europe doesn’t even have the soldiers for this war (unless they plan to forcibly draft the migrants) , but I guess they dream of a drone and missile war that will be run by AI and will kill mostly civilians.

    I guess it’s always like this — Politicians and bankers and the Usual Suspects are the ones who love wars (not having to fight them), average people, not so much.

  • @Dr. Krieger
    @anonymous

    This Crowley guy always seems to show up first in the comments always spewing anti-Christian bile. Very suspicious. Hasbara suspicious.

    As the kids say these days, " He sussy baka."

    Replies: @Dumbo, @Parbes

    The hint is on the name “Crowley”, a known satanist and spook. Maybe crypto-Jewish too, like fellow Satanist LaVey, not sure.

  • Richard Hanania penned an article titled The System Everyone Hates Is the One That Has Actually Worked, intended as a defence of every leftist college professor’s favourite ideological punching bag — neoliberalism. Hanania prides himself on attacking the populist beliefs of the left and right alike in favour of the “elite human capital” beliefs which...
  • This Banania guy is one of the dumbest, cringiest, most dishonest, most useless grifters in the whole blogosphere, and that’s saying something. I first heard of him in a Steve Sailer post (Sailer has a tendency to like and admire useless people that get media recognition, because that’s what he dreams of), and after a few lines realized he had nothing interesting to say, even back then.

    I have no idea who reads him. If it was up to me, he and all the influencers like him would be in the unemployment line or turning tricks to survive.

    Well, in a way, thats what they do.

  • Following the death of Charlie Kirk, all sorts of weird things are going on. It has “rallied the MAGA base” in a depraved manner, similar to the way the nation was rallied after 9/11. Clearly, this was intended by the administration, which has worked with all of these “alternative media influencers,” to stoke the hysteria....
  • @Laurent Guyénot
    Very useful article, for me. I am also wondering what happened to Nick Fuentes and find thinking almost it a bit scary. I started listening occasionally to the short excerpts of his talks on X about a year ago, during the last presidential campaign, and found him absolutely brillant. I was proud that he followed me on X. Before that, I thought "Christ is King" is silly and therefore had not paid attention to him: I have made up my mind some time ago that Christianity is part of the problem, not of the solution. But Nick's critics of Trump's betrayal of MAGA for the benefit of MIGA was brilliant, and the energy he put into it communicative. When he distanced himself from all the suspicions directed as Israel in the assassination of Kirk, I first thought he had rational reasons to not jump into the wagon, and I thought he was being useful in his skepticism. But as time passed and evidence of the FBI cover-up accumulated, and as I heard him advance irrational theories and more ad hominem attacks, I just lost patience and stopped listening to him. I understood that something happened to him. Was he told he was next on the list? Being on the older side, I cannot blame young people for not wanting to die. But on the other hand, if you receive death threats, the best way to protect your life is to expose those threats, so that may not be the reason for Nick's behavior. Possibly it is an ego problem. People whose life is entirely invested in their public image are addicted to it. Their ego takes precedence over their ideas, and they will try to destroy someone who defends the same idea just because they feel disrespected by him or her. Nick is obviously this kind of person. He may be on drugs too, and then there are rumors of his homosexuality. I don't ask anybody to be normal, and I understand that most individuals doing great things have psychological issues or even personality disorders. You have to get your energy from somewhere. But psychological issues can be greatly aggravated by the podcast culture, in which the form takes precedence on the content, and the obsession for gaining followers can make you lose sight of your priority: truth. Nick was great in the form (I write in the past, for he has now lost my trust), and, reading this article, I understand that he may not have been so smart on the content after all, if he largely borrowed it from Andrew Anglin. Perhaps you can't be both a deep thinker and a fast speaker.
    Interestingly, I used to support Nick's critics of Candace, whom I felt was doing great damage to herself and to here followers with the Brigitegate thing, but since Kirk's assassination, I have gained a lot of respect for her.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Chuzaemon, @Dumbo, @notonx, @Eustace Tilley (not)

    I have made up my mind some time ago that Christianity is part of the problem, not of the solution.

    Then I wonder what is the “problem” and what is the “solution”. (Personally, if he means the “Jewish problem”, I think there is no “solution”, nor even a “final solution” — there is no “solution” to human problems on this plane of terrenal existence.)

    When he distanced himself from all the suspicions directed as Israel in the assassination of Kirk,

    Kirk is not dead, it was a hoax. He was/is an actor, as is his fake wife and their non-existing prop children.

    Interestingly, I used to support Nick’s critics of Candace, whom I felt was doing great damage to herself and to here followers with the Brigitegate thing, but since Kirk’s assassination, I have gained a lot of respect for her.

    I don’t follow Candace, and I think she’s as suspicious/astroturfed a character as Nick, but I think she’s more right on Brigitte being a man than on Kirk’s “murder”.

    He may be on drugs too, and then there are rumors of his homosexuality.

    Cocaine? Perhaps. Many people who talk a lot for a living seem to take huge amounts of cocaine (i.e. Zewlenski). As for he being gay — I don’t know. People today talk as if anyone who is/was not married is a fag. Every historical character is turned into a supposed fag, from Caravaggio to Da Vinci, with little proof. He may really be just celibate. He’s not particularly attractive for females, despite his fame, that’s for sure, even Anglin probably gets more female interest than Nick does (well, from cheap Asian and Filipino whores, but still).

    • Replies: @Laurent Guyénot
    @Dumbo

    "problem" and "solution" was a short hand. What I have in mind is what kind of best political and social philosophy can serve society. Christianity has given us individualism (my salvation for me), the democratic ideal, the cult of human rights, and the cult of Israel : that's problems. As for the solution, I think China's confucianism has proven to be the best civilization-building wisdom tradition around, and I'm interested in reviving something very similar we had in Europe before Christianity: the philosophical tradition, Stoicism especially. I wrote somewhere: "Had it not been for Constantine the Great and his Christian faith, Socrates might have been to Europeans what Confucius is to the Chinese (both were born 8,000 miles apart, but only 80 years apart). Among the many schools that paid tribute to Socrates, the Stoics had the greatest, albeit the most diffuse influence on the Romans."

    Regarding Fuentes's gayness, there is more to the rumor than his "incelism". Read commentary 197.

    Replies: @Lackadaisical Reader

    , @JPS
    @Dumbo

    There are a lot of chicks who'd be into Fuentes and even middle-aged Anglin whose site has been virtually blacked out by years of censorship.

    There's a lot of people who buy into feminist propaganda that women are all hyper-selective and unobtainable.

    Women are often perverse and their motives may seem to be inscrutable, but ultimately, they're going to fix their attentions on somebody: often with hilarious/tragic consequences.

  • I never paid much attention to Fuentes. I watched maybe a couple of videos. I don’t know, there’s always something that seems off with him. But in general, I don’t watch many videos, I prefer to read, so I can’t give a very deep view.

    In such type of “blame-the-Jew” videos, I much prefer Bro Nathanael. He was pretty funny. He seems to have disappeared lately, although he still has some videos up on Rumble.

    I remember back in the day that Anglin would sing the praises of Nick, and then a couple of years ago or so he publicly reneged him when he associated with Richard Spencer and other dubious characters. Anglin was right, of course. Spencer is trash, and Nick is suspicious too.

    It’s true, Nick associates with strange characters and is strange himself. I’m not sure what’s the endgame or why he is being propped up. But he’s obviously being propped up lately.

    I don’t know if he’s actually gay, who knows, but he’s no Di Caprio, and the mainstream media now trying to sell him as a sex symbol is indeed pretty weird.

  • Yesterday’s piece was primarily about the “far right” pushing all of these mainstream narratives, but I am going to, probably on Monday, go through and show that it is the entire right doing all of these things they complained for like, a decade about the left doing. All of the “canceling.” Only with the right,...
  • @John Johnson
    @Ich war schon mal hier

    Anglin went long on both Trump and Putin. It hasn't worked out.

    Neither Trump nor Putin became the White or Orange fuhrer he always wanted to serve.

    Plus two cases of magic negro fever over a crazy Black entertainer.

    Just not going well for him and it is taking a toll mentally. It actually shows that he isn't a sociopath. I think he was most likely abused at some point and raised by clueless parents.

    He should quit politics and find a new way. Maybe move to Ukraine and find a wife. He is good with language and could work as a translator.

    Replies: @Commentator Mike, @Dumbo

    Maybe move to Ukraine and find a wife.

    Better a Russian wife. It seems Ukrainians are basically whores and only care about money, while Russians tend to have a bit more personality, although many are gold diggers too. Second, they are used to vodka drunks, so would have no problem with an Irishman’s alcoholism. Also, if you’re pro-Russian, it’s better to find a Russian (or Belarussian) wife. And finally, Ukraine is not just a dump but in the middle of a war, so why would anyone move there when most are trying to get out? While Russia is more prosperous and has something called the Shared Values Visa — basically you just need to prove that you’re not a criminal neither a drug addict nor have AIDS, and you get it. I think Anglin and even many UR commenters (not all) could qualify.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    @Dumbo


    Maybe move to Ukraine and find a wife.

     

    Better a Russian wife. It seems Ukrainians are basically whores and only care about money, while Russians tend to have a bit more personality, although many are gold diggers too.

    Where do you live? It is common sense in America that a Russian mail order bride is a bad idea. Every year there is a news report on one murdering her husband or robbing him blind. It's always some fat White conservative in the burbs who thinks he can land a 27 year old Russian model.

    I see no reason to assume that Russian women are better than Ukrainian. Russian women in the US are known to be materialistic. I know someone who is married to one and she completely fits the stereotype. She spends a ton of money on designer labels and requires an annual vacation to some resort destination. I suppose she is at least good looking and in shape. I'm amazed by how many men will marry a homely woman that is demanding.

    Also, if you’re pro-Russian, it’s better to find a Russian (or Belarussian) wife. And finally, Ukraine is not just a dump but in the middle of a war, so why would anyone move there when most are trying to get out?

    Russia is a dangerous place for all Americans. There was a pro-Russian youtuber who joined the Russian side and was literally buttraped before being killed. They thought he was some type of agent even though he had fought on the DPR side since 2014. Some Texan who made youtube songs about how much he loved Russia.

    Ukraine will be the better place when the war is over. It will be flowing with all kinds of Western contracts. Russia could have an economic collapse if the people are demoralized like Weimar. Even if they most likely take a chunk of Ukraine it could lead to a depressed period as the people realize their state media was lying to them. The state media depicts Ukraine as about to collapse at any time. They Russian people are expecting a complete surrender by Ukraine.

    Russia will also have a few hundred thousand angry veterans and that includes criminals that had their sentences commuted. Not a good place to have an American accent.

    Replies: @Commentator Mike

  • While Chris Martenson has, I believe, conclusively shown that Charlie Kirk was shot from a different building at Utah Valley University (the Sorenson Student Center) than the one where Tyler Robinson was allegedly positioned (the Losee Center)—also disproving, in my view, speculations of a fake death, which I wrongly defended in an earlier article—other researchers...
  • also disproving, in my view, speculations of a fake death, which I wrongly defended in an earlier article

    LOL. For once that Laurent was on the right track for something… He changes his mind. 😀

    Honestly, I don’t get the “Israel did it” crowd. I mean, first, the guy was an über-Zionist who even kept Jewish Sabbaths (even though being nominally “Christian”), and, second, he was just an activist, a propagandist, with no real power to do much. Why would anyone kill him? Of course, the theory that he was killed by a tranny lover seems even more far-fetched. He probably didn’t die, and is now in “Valhalla” (nudge nudge, wink wink).

  • The survey begins with Richard Spencer for his key role in the newly emergent Right, which ran parallel with MAGA, each reflecting the limitations and betrayals of the other. Spencer came to prominence as the first noteworthy right-wing figure of the internet age that profoundly altered the nature of political discourse. While other and older...
  • I haven’t read the article, just the title and word count, and the title was already too long. It seems that Priss hasn’t learned how to write readable articles, even with the help with ChatGPT. In fact it reads like ChatGPT (which I hate).

    But it could all be easily summarized with two lines of a known meme:

    – So… Spencer was a Fed?
    – Always has been.

    • Agree: N. Joseph Potts
    • Replies: @Ich war schon mal hier
    @Dumbo

    I completely agree.

    These articles read like ChatGPT and are written in bad faith by someone who is hostile towards the core readership of this site but presents as a friend.

    Out of charity I tried to read it, but soon had to give up. It begins with the lie that Spencer was the first right wing intellectual (I use the term loosely since he is not well read and not so sharp, but the word is still more apt than the word "leader") with a sizeable following whose tactics wase developed under consideration of the possibilities of the new medium internet.

    That is patently untrue. Figures like Alex Linder (recently deceased), Kyle Hunt and so many others predate Spencer. Spencer as a fed was secretly promoted by the MSM. He was the man they loved to hate which naturally had some appeal for people who hated the MSM. So in the end he was the new David Duke for a while, before they decided they could not revive this old gambit, because the internet became to big. And so ended this career of Richard Spencer.

    , @Dreck
    @Dumbo

    It would be easier if you told us who on the Right isn't a Fed. Feel free to include yourself, if applicable.

  • The other day, waiting for a connecting flight in Porto, Portugal, I decided to visit the old city center. Stopping for a coffee in a local cafe, I was surprised to be attended by personnel addressing me in American English, despite my placing the order in Portuguese, though with a Brazilian accent. As my ears...
  • Maybe, but I am not sure if things would have turned out all that differently.

    Catholic hardline Franco kept Spain on the leash for a while, but what happened? Right after his death Spain went fully-left and today it is one of the most leftist countries in Europe, and one with the most Africans and Arabs and other migrants. Also among the most rabidly feminist ones, together with the Scandinavian ones.

    In an ironical twist of fate, it was the evil Communists (Judeo-Bolsheviks) who protected (Eastern) Europeans (for a while) from most migration and the excesses of consumerism, feminism, etc, while the Western side went full-Weimar. Law of unintended consequences?

    On the other hand, perhaps Hitler was “hired” to lose the war and provide the “reason” for Israel, and that’s why he was allowed to get to power. A sort of Trump of its day? Managed collapse of Germany/Europe? I don’t know… But he did have a few Jews among his higher-ups and financiers.

    • Replies: @Lackadaisical Reader
    @Dumbo


    In an ironical twist of fate, it was the evil Communists (Judeo-Bolsheviks) who protected (Eastern) Europeans (for a while) from most migration and the excesses of consumerism, feminism, etc, while the Western side went full-Weimar. Law of unintended consequences?
     
    I don't know, it's complicated.
    Nowadays 34 years after the USSR disbanded, life is still pretty drab in Eastern Europe on average.

    https://youtu.be/2bNzjBJF_G0?si=mZ70y2DsAsjckFjo

    No wonder they crave to join the EU in order to get more gadgets and things (they won't probably join the EU at this particular location though).

    Replies: @Anonymous

  • Never forget October 7th 2023, that fateful day when Israelis were brutally massacred by Israeli tanks and Israeli helicopters and Israeli drones and Israeli soldiers and Israeli bullets, and also by Hamas a bit. ❖ I’m sorry but it’s just plain hilarious that we’re still expected to hate Hamas after spending two years being shown...
  • This is one reason why there’s so much overlap between white supremacism and Christian fundamentalism, by the way. White supremacists understand that they can’t have wealthy, educated women choosing when they do and do not reproduce, because it turns out having and raising children is a massive ordeal and a woman with rights and resources will only sometimes feel safe and supported enough to do it. So they need to find ways to turn them back into a man’s property and force them to churn out white children.

    This is also a lot of the drive behind all the tradwife stuff, the incel stuff, the anti-abortion stuff, and the “your body, my choice” rape apologia you see on the far right. White supremacists are searching for ways to bump up white birth rates against the wishes of women. White supremacism is unworkable without male supremacism.

    So, basically, Mrs, Johnstone is admitting that the “incels” and “white supremacists” and people like Anglin are indeed right: births are declining because of women’s rights. Women, when having the choice, don’t want to have children. That is really the bottom of it (although there are arguably other causes, such as vaccines, chemical stuff on air/water, climate fearmongering etc).

    They understand that automating society is the only way to stave off the future wave of immigration that will otherwise be necessary to keep civilization functioning.

    First of all, the “wave of immigration”, in particular from Africa and North Africa, will not “keep civilization functioning”. It will destroy it completely. They do not care about (European) “civilization”, and even if they did, they wouldn’t be able to maintain it. They will turn Europe into a giant favela. That supposedly smart people such as Johnstone cannot see that is astounding.

    But also, the same people pushing the automation crap are basically the same people pushing migrants. Both are ways to reduce labour costs and make the rich richer (and, incidentally, the poor poorer).

    Eventually they start intermarrying with the white population, and before long humanity consists of lovely shades of tan.

    Johstone pushing for the Kalergi plan? Who would have guessed…

    I guess there is no hope. I sympathize with Mrs. Johnstone on some aspects, but in the end, it seems she’s okay with the planet becoming a “brown utopia” (which it will never be — Brazil is what you get).

    By the way, there’s no such thing as “White supremacism” (it’s white survivalism at this point), much less “Christian fundamentalism” (even the recent Popes are all on board with globalism, and protestats are worse).

    • Replies: @Kingsmeg
    @Dumbo


    So, basically, Mrs, Johnstone is admitting that the “incels” and “white supremacists” and people like Anglin are indeed right: births are declining because of women’s rights. Women, when having the choice, don’t want to have children.

    Johstone pushing for the Kalergi plan? Who would have guessed…
     
    She's not pushing it, she's simply describing the world as she sees it. Given our present circumstances, working class people don't want to go through the hell on earth that is parenthood + grinding poverty. Is that selfish? Well, yes, but it's also human.

    Caity is married and has young children.

    Replies: @paddy_too, @mulga mumblebrain

  • I know---another Charlie Kirk article. Try not to puke. However, I think his story can provide insight into Mossad-Deep State psychological operations as well as the trajectory of Western Civilization, and perhaps we can even have a bit of fun along the way. Charlie Kirk was a psyop, in both life and death. At first...
  • That Kirk’s “death” was a staged hoax to cause public trauma IS the simples explanation.

    No need to conflate aliens or lizards or criticize all “conspiracy theorists” by association.

    It is not all that complicated to create such fake events, and it has been done many times before.

    Does anyone believe in the official stories of Sandy Hoax? The Holocaust? 9/11? October 7?

    • Replies: @M Phillips
    @Dumbo

    This op was huge, when you consider the after hoax celebration.

    Could you pick Charlie Kirk out of a photograph before this event?

    Smith Mundt Modernization Act of 2012, apparently legalizing these staged events.

    , @AGK
    @Dumbo

    I would agree that it's the simplest explanation and doesn't fall within the realm of space alien conspiracies. Baudrillard predicted such incidents as the Kirk false flag would become commonplace.

    For me the biggest giveaway was the massive memorial service. It looked like it had been planned for months.

  • Politicians, the police and the media want millions of us to imagine we are alone in grieving the slaughter of Gaza’s children – and that our grief is shameful. They need us to succumb to their lies Members of the Jewish community have been grieving for three days now over the killing of two innocent...
  • @mulga mumblebrain
    @Dumbo

    Evil, vicious, hideous cunt-children are precious to all decent people. Why did you crawl out from beneath your rock, you abomination?

    Replies: @Dumbo

    It seems you misunderstood my comment?

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
    @Dumbo

    Are you joking? You really are dumb.

  • I and millions of other Britons, some of them Jews, have been grieving for much longer – over the killing of tens of children in Gaza not on one day last week but on every single day, without break, for two years. And yet no politicians or media seem to think it important to respect my grief.

    Are you a Palestinian? If not, then it is not “your grief”, and they are not “your people.” You’re just a virtue-signaller, like most white people (leftists).

    I mean, I understand, it’s terrible what’s supposedly happening to the Gazans, and I suppose it’s interesting that Jews are starting to be hated by basically everyone (again!) these days.

    But still, I wonder if Mr. Cook would be so sad if was white Britons being killed? Perhaps he would say that they deserved it, for being colonizers or whatever?

    This is the part of the leftist mentality that I don’t get at all. “Brown people good, white people bad.”

    P.S. That “synagogue attack” was likely a hoax or a false flag.

    Finally, I don’t think Jews are grieving all that much. Antisemitism is “good for the Jews.” This is what most people don’t understand.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
    @Dumbo

    Evil, vicious, hideous cunt-children are precious to all decent people. Why did you crawl out from beneath your rock, you abomination?

    Replies: @Dumbo

  • One time this riverboat gambler convinced me and everyone else on the ship that he was just an honest, misunderstood fellow. We believed him when he told us that some bad dudes had beaten him out of sheer prejudice. And as he’s acting out the beating for us (for the tenth time), swinging his arms...
  • The book of Ariel Toaff is interesting.

    There is also the killing of a Catholic priest to use his blood in rituals, a more recent case that is well-documented (I think 19th century).

    I don’t think such ritual killings were very common, but they happened.

    Judaism is strange, because, in general, or in most religions, the more religious you are, the better or wiser and more tolerant person you are or tend to be. But with Jews it is the opposite, many secular Jews can be nice people (although usually tending Left), but religious orthodox Jews are very much anti-Goyim and very aggressive. (well, maybe Islam is similar in this sense, they have their fanatics too).

    Religious Jews are very anti-Christian and against any kind of communion with gentiles (but most especially Christians). They get along better with Islam.

    Secular Jews, are not so much personally anti-Christian or anti-Goy. Perhaps because of their ignorance of their “religious” texts (Talmud).

    The problem of Judaism is basically religious. Once their religion is gone and they all convert (sincerely) to Christianity (or to Islam, or Buddhism, if they prefer), the problem is more or less solved. (but there is the issue of cryptos, so there’s that, they are good at hiding).

    • Replies: @Jameson
    @Dumbo


    in general, or in most religions, the more religious you are, the better or wiser and more tolerant person you are or tend to be
     
    With Islam, the true-believers are the Jihad killers, clearly the most intolerant and evil of all religious followers in world history. There is no other religion that comes remotely close to the evil Islam inspires. Islam states that Muslims who do NOT engage in Jihad are hypocrites. Evil is the norm, the expected state, for a true Muslim.

    Replies: @Passing by, @John Trout

    , @Xavier
    @Dumbo


    But with Jews it is the opposite, many secular Jews can be nice people (although usually tending Left), but religious orthodox Jews are very much anti-Goyim and very aggressive. (well, maybe Islam is similar in this sense, they have their fanatics too).
     
    Not entirely true. Zionism began as a secular project, not a religious one. And even here, ethnic cleansing and Jewish supremecy were its earliest goals. Essentially, Zionism/secular Jews embody the misanthropic spirit of the law, if not the letter (rituals, dietary laws etc).

    But I agree with the overall thrust of your post. Judaism does make a people terrible. The Greeks, Romans, and Egyptians had very little praise for Jews, and 2000 years later, modern Jews are just as appalling despite being descendants of converts to Judaism that had no cultural or genetic ties to ancient Israel. So we're seeing new populations embrace Judaism and become just as misanthropic as their predecessors.

    Replies: @Rurik

    , @Christoph88
    @Dumbo

    The Orthodox jews are always the ones spitting on and hitting Christians in the Holy Land.

  • Yesterday’s piece was primarily about the “far right” pushing all of these mainstream narratives, but I am going to, probably on Monday, go through and show that it is the entire right doing all of these things they complained for like, a decade about the left doing. All of the “canceling.” Only with the right,...
  • @Mountain Man
    @Sulu

    Agreed. Andy’s funding was cut and now he clearly couldn’t care less about working. He’s basically given up on his writing and himself. Andy was making a grip of cash from USAID and was able to support his alcoholism and his basic financial needs were met.

    It looks like Anglin is on strike, hoping to get better pay from his government masters. He doesn’t write anymore because he’s not receiving compensation. My suspicion is that he’s off the wagon and consuming massive amounts of alcohol from morning until night. Hopefully he can get back on track and clean himself up. Years ago he was on fire with exceptional writing and humor. His website was phenomenal. The contrast between then and now is profound. Something is going on behind the scenes, we can only speculate at this point. At his age he should be settled in with a wife and children and running his website. Unfortunately he may be a case study on wasted talent.

    I hope he follows through with his new idea of podcasting. Andy did a podcast a few years ago that was good, not great but good and was improving with each episode.

    Replies: @Commentator Mike, @Dumbo, @Anonymous

    Stupid. Since when Trump has cut anything that really matters?? He even put a hindu-dindu as FBI director. I doubt Andrew was getting money from USAID, or, if he was, that Trump would cut it.

    I think it’s just what he said it was. He’s just not into it so much anymore, and I can understand. I am also less interested in reading about politics. In fact, I couldn’t care less. It’s all theatre.

    • Thanks: Pierre de Craon
    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
    @Dumbo

    I think Anglin is depressed because what he said would happen is coming true. Trump is all about recruiting Whites to go to kill and die fighting wars for the Jews. Hence the renaming of the Department of Defense to the Department of War, and all the bellicose and belligerent rhetoric coming out of the War Department and the Secretary of War. Hence the gathering of all the generals and admirals under Trump. Hence the removal of woke culture, trannies and other useless elements from the military so that they can be replaced with White males. Hence the warlike speech of the Secretary of War at that militaristic gathering.

    Maybe Anglin is even questioning the fascist ideology he formerly espoused and promoted as this is what it eventually leads to.


    I am also less interested in reading about politics. In fact, I couldn’t care less. It’s all theatre.
     
    It's a deadly theatre and dark days are coming. Actually it's even more reason to get interested and involved countering their evil deadly plans.

    Replies: @John Johnson, @Same old same old

  • It wasn’t until the evening that I learned that Charlie Kirk had been shot. As the sun was going down, I began a routine phone call with a politically involved friend of mine, and I asked how he was doing. He sounded distressed and told me that he was shaken by the news of the...
  • There’s a fourth (or fifth) possibility: no one died, it was all a hoax and he’s in Tel Aviv having gay parties. His fake wife will continue the scam, collecting money from the clueless MAGA hats.

    Forget it, Jake. It’s Hymietown.

    • Replies: @anonymous
    @Dumbo

    bingo. the obvious answer.

  • There is something ineffably eternal about the “drum beating and bell chiming from sundown to daybreak” when it comes to the Bell Tower and the Drum Tower standing in the north end of ancient Beijing. There can hardly be equal structures around the world when it comes to architecture as music. They are like two...
  • Global governance, eh?

    Sorry Pepe, that doesn’t sound as exciting to me as it sounds to you.

    I guess we get an global government (and AI, digital cash, health passes, etc) with the Americans, but also with the Chinks.

    Any way you look at it you lose…

    I guess Mr. Kaczinsky and the Luddites were right. The enemy is modern technology (and those who use it to control us).

  • So many questions arise since a sniper with demonstrated skill assassinated conservative activist Charlie Kirk in broad daylight on Sept. 10 — this as he addressed a crowd of several thousand no less. We have only our questions as of now, and history suggests these may be all we will ever have as to the...
  • @ariadna
    With the exception of Shakespeare, “little Latin” is often worse than none at all because it encourages the pretentiousness of the ignoramus.
    If the author simply relied on generally approved translations then he would know that “Cui bobo” means literally “To whom is it a benefit? much like “Cui prodest,” basically “who stands to profit from it?”
    The author, however, probably looks up “bono” in the Latin English dictionary, finds that it means “good”/“well” and comes up with his own grating translation of “To Whom Goes the Good” which sounds like some pidgin English.
    WHY? Why was “Who benefits” not good enough?!

    Replies: @Jim H, @Dumbo

    Yeah, I noticed that too. “Cui bono” is usually translated in English as “Who benefits?”

    I struggled to understand what the author meant at first, not realizing it was a weird literal translation of the famous Latin phrase.

    As for the answer to the question, “who benefits”, well, this whole operation and fake assassination appears to have been created to create even more division between fake “left” and fake “right”. I think Kirk is in gay parties in Tel Aviv together with Epstein and a few others.

  • When Charlie Kirk died last Wednesday, I saw people having complete meltdowns, and felt it was my job to be the voice of reason. This came across as crass at the time, as people were really full of emotion. If you were one of the emotional ones, and you go back now and read those...
  • Like most celebrities, be it in entertainment or politics, Charlie Kirk was basically an actor playing a role. He’s not “real” in any way, just as his death was probably not “real”. Just look at his supposed children, who have no name or face, being held like props by the supposed couple.

    Nick Fuentes, probably the same thing. A manufactured personality to be used when the time comes.

    I don’t know, I just don’t trust any of those “young leaders”, either in the left or on the right. But mostly those on the “right” appear to be Feds or connected to the Feds — Richard Spencer, Gavin McInness, how many more examples do we need?

    Basically nothing in modern politics is real. It’s worse than Hollywood, where there’s also brainwashing but at least they admit it’s all scripted and played by actors.

  • @Brás Cubas
    Speaking of the far left, Anglin said:

    They can riot and break some store fronts. But they are not a massive military threat.
     
    Well, I don't know about that, but it's fairly obvious that immigrants don't riot or break store fronts, and are far less of a military threat than the far left. And still, Anglin has made a career out of verbally attacking immigrants.

    Replies: @Dumbo

    a) There are millions times more immigrants that there are trannies or leftists.

    b) They may not be a “military” threat, at least right now, but what’s the difference? They are population replacement, which is worse. Most leftists at least are white (in fact, you’d be surprised at how white (and Jewish, but that’s another story) leftists are. Other races in general don’t fall for that “kumbaya we are all equal” stuff.

    • Replies: @NobodyImportant
    @Dumbo

    They sure as hell don't, just go to any place of business and you'll find that any race that isn't white who run the place. They either have their whole damn family working there, or people of their own ethnicity. And I've seen this in Asian nail shops, Laundromats owned by Hispanics or Indians. Same thing with Restaurants, if the management of those places is anything but white, all of his/her employees will be of the same racial background as the owner of that business. They violate the hell out of discrimination laws, like none of it even applies to them which is why all that "diversity" bullshit is not something they push or promote within their establishment. That's a straight up White Lefty invention.

    Any company that isn't owned by whites get to also say "Black Owned, Indian Owned, Women Only, Gay Friendly Owned, etc" But whites can never say "White Owned Business." Shit is exclusive to everyone else but Whites. They are forced to be tolerant of everyone while the other groups do not.

  • Everyone is trying to play the victim after Charlie Kirk’s assassination. But if you really think about it, I’m the biggest victim of this situation. I’m expected to write something meaningful about a completely meaningless tragedy and it’s basically impossible. People have complained about my commentary. It’s come across as too crass or whatever. I...
  • @obwandiyag
    I don't get it. How can the very rich believe that you can build some kind of computer and then stick your brain, your memories, your thoughts, your emotions, everything right inside it there?

    As far as I can see, even if they could make an exact replica of your brain--it still wouldn't be you! It would be a replica. Like twins. They look alike they talk alike at times they even walk alike, what a crazy time!--but they are not the same! They are two different people.

    And computers will never be able to make any kind of a halfass replica of anybody's or any thing's brain, even a newt's, anyway (not "anyways" which is what illiterate hillbillies say). What they will be able to do is go around shooting everybody like in that movie and then nobody can say they aren't a replica because he will be dead.

    Replies: @Dumbo, @James J. O'Meara

    Not just that, it is impossible to reproduce conscience. “AI” is not real “intelligence”, and machines (almost by definition) cannot have a conscience.

    I think the idea of all these rich people is to store all their brain information in the case that someone in the “future” finds out how to bring it back to life — just as they do the same with their bodies, via cryogenics, or other similar technologies.

    It seems to be a dumb idea, better to accept that you grow old and one day you die.

    Or maybe they want to die simply because they are afraid to go to Hell?

  • Pretty good article, especially the fight between the “right” (MAGA) and the “left” (Antifa), which is what is mostly what is being promoted by this event — further radicalization of both camps.

    The only thing I probably disagree — the event itself is not real. Or, at least, I don’t think it is.

    Of course, in the age of AI and total media control, we can no longer know if anything is “real” or not. (Anglin wrote about this “singularity” another time.) Hell, we can’t even know for sure if “Anglin” is still alive or this is being written by AI or someone else.

    But, my two cents, after watching a few videos and reading about it, is that he whole thing was staged, maybe with a blood squib. Charlie Kirk is an actor as is his supposed wife. They don’t have real children together and he may be gay. (At least, that’s the vibe I get for the weird videos she published, and the absence of the children with her). The “shooter” Tyler Robinson was acting too.

    Most people will say that this is impossible, a conspiracy theory, etc, but, well, Hollywood does this all the time. And we know that at least some of the events which were previously sold as “real”, in the end, weren’t, or at least weren’t what we were initially told (i.e. Sandy Hook, Trump’s shooting, among others).

    • Agree: A_Hand_Hidden, APT
    • Replies: @Rich
    @Dumbo

    That's an interesting theory that Kirk and his family were actors. Never would have occurred to me, but you could actually be right. Guy was aging out of his job as a campus agitator and there really wasn't much more he could do with his youth organization. Almost too old. By killing off the character, you can bring in a new captain to run the enterprise and keep the show going. He did look a little haggard in the recent photos in the msm, unshaven, t-shirt, hair a mess. I just wonder if they really killed him or if that was a fake, too? Reminds me of that old "civil rights" character, Michael "Martin" King. He played a Baptist minister just trying to get "equality" while he was beating up hookers, sleeping with men and reading speeches written by communists. Start looking at things through that lens and the world starts getting pretty disturbing.

    , @A_Hand_Hidden
    @Dumbo

    Hey, good to see Miles Mathis checking back in. But yeah, you're getting it.

    Greta the hoary "environmental wacko" is also an actress, from a jewish acting family and now onto her next role, something to do with the Palestinians; not positive as I do my best to avoid jew theater as the production values are so cheesy

    Acting seems a weird ability, that not everyone has; only a small percentage can do it and do it well...and since acting is basically lying with sincerity, a key ability of the psychopath, one can see how jews would not only value it, but be absolutely the best at the craft.

    Reagan ... actor.
    Trump ... actor.

    There's a reason the supposed outsiders they prop up on the national stage are actors. I wonder what that reason could be?

    Did you know in many ancient cultures actors were lower than whores, and not allowed to testify at trial? Let's kick this to the AI:


    In ancient Rome, actors (histriones) were considered infames — a legal and social status of disgrace. Because of this, they were barred from testifying as witnesses in court, along with others of disreputable status such as prostitutes, gladiators, and pimps.

    This restriction came from Roman ideas of honor and credibility: the belief was that people who made their living through performance, spectacle, or morally suspect trades were untrustworthy and lacked the dignity required for legal testimony.
     
    Naturally you'e aware ol' Bill Clinton was sterile, as he mollified one of his rape victims by saying she had no risk of pregnancy as he had the (mumps?) as a youngster. Like all (pretend) good respectable people trying to appeal to the dull masses tho they needed a nuclear family so lez Hillary got impregnated by Web Hubbell, as the story goes. But again, acting. All a show for the theater of the mind.

    Obama a lifetime homosexual, and his wife a non-op transgender? Likely true. Macron and his wife? Same.

    "Not only is the universe stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine".

    Sir Arthur Eddington
     
    Beneath their every presentation lies a palimpsest, its faint script whispering the same timeless impulse: to subvert, to parasitize, to control...

    Who killed Chuck? Who cares? He never once paid my mortgage & since everything they say is a lie, one's very engagement at any level is one's loss. When all the wine on proffer is poisoned, you shouldn't drink any of it and speculation of who made it, how poisonous it is, or comparing their bouquets is time ill spent.

    Hey, where's that Epstein list by the way?
  • In just a couple of days, an impressive amount of information has been brought to light pointing to Israel’s strong motive to take out Charlie Kirk ASAP. I will here compile that information, as I found it on X and other Internet outlets. In doing so, I am not influenced by my personal opinion on...
  • But if there was another shooter — where was him? Some say one of his bodyguards from behind, but that seems to make even less sense.

    That he was killed by/because of Israel is only slightly less absurd that the official story that he was killed by a (supposed) random leftist with 4.0 GPA, conservative family, and a supposed tranny or furry boyfriend.

    The easiest solution to the enigma is — he wasn’t really killed, it was all staged. There are many videos showing how it could have been done. Sure, it was done by professionals — Hollywood professionals.

    The widow’s crying at the coffin with two Masonic rings sees to have been added for comedic effect.

    • LOL: VinnyVette
    • Replies: @Disinfected
    @Dumbo

    The old guy in the teal jacket standing right next to him. Why would you presume that makes even less sense? Might have also been staged, can't be 100% sure, but I don't think so.

    , @VinnyVette
    @Dumbo

    Faked? So Charlie is partying somewhere with Jim Morrison, the real Paul McCartney, and Elvis snorting blow and bangin hookers? Tinfoil hat is wrapped a little too tight. 😆😆😆😆

    Replies: @Anonymous534

  • Western elites don’t care what you think or say, so long as you don’t notice that they are the ones making money from a genocide, asset-stripping western economies and trashing our planet Inevitably, the more extreme the West’s actions – by, for example, actively aiding Israel’s genocide in Gaza – the more extreme the assumptions...
  • “Billionaire Class”… Well that’s a new euphemism. Or did J. Coke mean Buddhists?

  • I don't spend any time on social media nor do I have any interest in the mainstream conservative movement, so I'd only been very slightly aware of Charlie Kirk prior to his sudden assassination on Wednesday, shot dead at the age of 31 by a sniper while speaking at the University of Utah Utah Valley...
  • In the age of AI and total media manipulation, we can’t really know what happened and what didn’t, what is “real” and what isn’t. All we can know is the narrative that they show.

    The narrative is that a former student with a perfect GPA and a good scholarship abandoned everything and decided to shoot a random right-wing activist for no reason whatsoever.

    Supposedly he also had a tranny boyfriend, but he came from a conservative family (his father was in law enforcement) and had a good relationship with his parents.

    None of it makes any sense whatsoever.

    I was thinking that the former student was a patsy and the shooting was done by someone else, but now it is starting to look like a complete hoax, similar to Trump’s “shooting”, only a little better done this time.

    The whole thing was probably staged. How do we know it wasn’t? We see this kind of stuff everyday in Hollywood movies. How do we know any image we see on the news, promoted by people who lie all the time, is “real”?

    There are a lot of weird things, not just in the official story, but in the videos that are circulating online.

    • Replies: @Patrick McNally
    @Dumbo

    > his father was in law enforcement

    That claim has been contradicted.

    https://www.newsweek.com/matt-robinson-father-tyler-charlie-kirk-suspect-2128904

    -----
    Matt Robinson is a registered Republican, according to public records reviewed by Newsweek. Early reports indicated that he was a veteran of the Washington County Sheriff's Office, but the Washington County Attorney's office said that reporting was not accurate and that Robinson does not have ties to local law enforcement.

    "The individual arrested is NOT related to Washington County law enforcement! There are multiple people with the same names," the attorney's office said in a statement posted to Facebook.
    -----

  • WARNING TO READERS:
  • @John Johnson
    @Intelligent Dasein

    Why is everybody saying this? The rooftop escape video clearly shows the alleged shooter carrying a long satchel that could easily contain a rifle. The conspiracy theories have gotten so weird that they simply deny things that are right in front of their face, contained in the video evidence.

    The shooter confessed to his dad and was turned in by his pastor. He matches the picture. The range is now 150 yards with an off the shelf 3006 scope/rifle combo. That would be within the range of a redneck deer shot. Not a Jewish John Wick super assassin.


    Mainstream media on Biden laptop: We will not accept any possible outside theories. The laptop belongs to Hunter Biden. We don't need to look at the evidence in front of us. We have decided.

    Alt right on Charlie Kirk shooting: We will not accept anything but a conspiracy theory. This must have been a Mossad hit. We have decided and don't need to look at the evidence in front of us.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Dumbo

    What is the evidence? “The TV said so”?

    The whole story is on its face ridiculous.
    Kirk was shot by a random leftist. Why? No reason. Just for the LULZ.
    The supposed shooter somehow manages to escape with his rifle (where? inside a backpack? that’s all that is seen on the video), but then leaves it in the woods. Why? No reason. Just for the LULZ.
    The supposed widow makes cringey videos to the MAGA audience crying in front of what looks like a mannequin and gives weird speeches (I am now thinking Kirk may have been gay and that was a fake marriage. Maybe now he’s in Tel Aviv having fun).

    Maybe things really happened this way. After all, life sometimes can be stupid. And, real or fake, that’s the narrative they will push in any case — left vs right, Antifa vs MAGA, and more censorship and more AI-police state stuff. Just as 911 gave us no shoes in airports and Rapiscan. Some people will make money with those things. Most will not.

    Honestly, whatever “really” happened is not really all that important — in the age of AI, you can’t even tell anymore. What matters is the narrative. The media is the message, as McLuhan said. The message of current AI-media is: since you can’t tell which video is real and which one isn’t, trust our managed narrative.

    • Agree: Half Norwegian
    • Replies: @John Johnson
    @Dumbo

    The whole story is on its face ridiculous.
    Kirk was shot by a random leftist. Why? No reason. Just for the LULZ.

    More like another confused White 22 year old who lacks purpose and direction. He was raised by Christian conservatives and yet still chose to lash out and what he perceived to be the enemy. But Con Inc tells me that raisin' em right is all that is needed. Well in this case that didn't work.

    But yes this is political violence.

    Germans on right and left shot opposing leaders during Weimar like an ongoing sport. The shooters tended to be in their 20s.

    I normally disagree with Anglin but he is right in that this type of violence shouldn't be a surprise.

    The supposed widow makes cringey videos to the MAGA audience crying in front of what looks like a mannequin and gives weird speeches

    People grieve in their own way and I'm not going to judge on that.

    Honestly, whatever “really” happened is not really all that important — in the age of AI, you can’t even tell anymore.

    AI makes it harder to determine the truth but the shooter already confessed and was turned in by his pastor.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  • Apparently it is not even a corpse but some sort of dummy. Check out Gemma O’Doherty’s Substack.

    Anyway, it seems clear to me now that the whole point of this operation was to create exactly this sort of public trauma and trying to get the maximum emotional response from the right/MAGA crowd.

    Notice that now they found out, quelle surprise, that the supposed shooter was not just a leftist, but was in a romantic relationship with a transgender furry. So he climbed on a roof to shoot Kirk because… Why? Kirk wasn’t even against transgenders, apparently.

    Anglin’s title saying the assassination was a “deepfake” may be a joke, but I no longer believe any of this is real. I don’t think it’s deepfake or CGI, though, probably old-school practical effects.

  • No wonder the shooter missed his face Apparently, seeing some guy get shot in the neck is traumatizing for many people. I don’t really know why, given the level of desensitization we’ve all experienced. I mean, it really seems kinda nuts, the fact that this is being considered such a big deal. I really would...
  • @Von Rho
    It is a shame what Kirk did. He was favorable to sanctions to some Latin American countries such as Brasil, because the Supreme Court of this latter was - according to him - persecuting freedom of speach and opposition politicians, like Bolsonaro, what is a lie. Bolsonaro was convited because there were a lot of evidence he tried a coup. Furthermore, the sanctions imposed by Trump are affecting more the American than Brazilian economy.

    Replies: @Dumbo

    Bolsonaro didn’t “attempt a coup”, his supporters did the same theatre that was done in the US January 6, or whenever it was. In both cases, all with the police allowing it (because they wanted to later portray it as an “attack on democracy”). Bolsonaro is like Trump in many ways.

    By the way, Lula was also in prison for a while, but in his case it was considered “lawfare” or “injustice”. Weird. As far as I know, it is EXACTLY the same issue: an opponent is put in prison so that he cannot run in the elections against the current president.

    Typical Latin American stuff, really. I guess at least they advanced a bit, before they used to shoot their rivals, now they only put their rivals in prison.

    • Replies: @Von Rho
    @Dumbo

    You're wrong. Lula was convicted and released from prison because his trial was annulled, since Judge Moro was also conducting the investigations, which is prohibited for a judge, and this corrupt judge also forced the defendant to accept the lawyers he recommended, etc.

  • @Peter1488
    @Same old same old

    Moscow "katsaps" are a cocktail of Mongoloids, Tatars and Finno-Ugric peoples. There is no Slavic root there.
    "katsap, kasap" is translated from Turkic as a butcher, a murderer, a marauder... that's how the peoples of Europe called them in the Middle Ages.
    Rus, they are Ukrainians, this is an autochthonous population from the times of Rus to the present.

    Replies: @JPS, @Dumbo

    Shut up, you’re either a Jew or a dumb Hohol. The only Ukrainian “natives” are Khazars. Most older “Ukrainians” I know living abroad who left before the current wave (and the most vocal about fighting this stupid war) are actually Jews. In the Ukrainian government I assume it’s mostly Jews. Just as a lot of “Iranians” in Los Angeles are actually Jews.

    That said, there is no difference between Russians and actual Ukrainians (not Khazars), the only difference is that Ukrainians are probably more mixed with Poles and Tatars, and Russians with other peoples depending on which region they are (it is a huge country, of course the further East you go the more Asiatic it becomes).

    Who cares! No one gave a FUCK about that supposed country that didn’t even exist until 1991, and there is no reason to give a FUCK now either. And certainly not billions of dollars and weapons.

  • @Leif
    @Anon

    "Not as easy shot to make."

    Must say I really do not like the disrespectful sensationalism surrounding this -and other recent- events, just in off-chance case it might put an end to endless speculations in that regard:

    Apparently the shot was NOT that special at all, but aimed at and hitting center-body-mass, but sadly the bullet-proof vest Kirk WAS wearing at the time then instead of absorbing-, ricocheted the bullet upwards hitting his neck, as Henrik documented in detail in his last - and thankfully respectfull and nuanced- Red Ice Radio interview, if interested:

    https://redice.tv/red-ice-radio/why-was-charlie-kirk-assassinated

    Replies: @yolo, @Passing by, @Dumbo

    How does a bullet ricochet on the chest and hit the neck? Especially if on a downwards trajectory, as the shot was up from a roof? It would have gone sideways or downwards.

    Or perhaps, this is a cousin of JFK’s “magic bullet”?

    But I suppose it could be possible, in any case what I find much harder to believe is that a random leftist student just decided to shoot someone he didn’t even know and in the process ruin his own life and his family’s life because he didn’t like Kirk’s speeches or something.

    I don’t know, I suppose some leftists are insane, but, you know, usually they will just do graffiti or vandalism or protest or riot and that will satisfy their violent impulses.

    Plus, climbing to a roof (undetected) and escaping and all the planning involved. People are making it as if it was easy, but, I don’t think so.

    So, I don’t think that dumb student was the shooter — if there was a shooter at all, and this whole thing wasn’t some sort of kayfabe like in Trump’s “shooting”.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    @Dumbo

    How does a bullet ricochet on the chest and hit the neck? Especially if on a downwards trajectory, as the shot was up from a roof? It would have gone sideways or downwards.

    Or perhaps, this is a cousin of JFK’s “magic bullet”?

    Bullets can ricochet off water.

    There is nothing magic about the JFK bullet.

    Objects at high speeds can bounce off anything and take unpredictable angles. This is especially true for bullets since they are spinning.

    A bullet isn't a perfect laser hole maker like in the movies.

    Replies: @guibus

  • Look, guys. I’m not going to recant anything about saying Charlie Kirk is a shitbag, and I don’t really care he’s dead. I never said he deserved it, or that killing people is good, or whatever. But I just really don’t understand what the difference is between him dying and Ben Shapiro dying, and the...
  • Jeez, You’d Have Thought They Assassinated Bob Hope

    That was the whole point of this assassination — real or fake, it doesn’t matter. Like 9/11, what matters is the psychological impact. That’s what they wanted, an apparently friendly, harmless conservative activist killed in plain sight, generating shockwaves and panic all across the political spectrum, but mainly among right-wing young people, and this idea that “they killed (Bob) Hope”.

    Of course they will find that the killer is some Antifa-tranny leftist, which will further divide people, and they will roll out some more dystopian totalitarian measures with AI control and so on, and this will be supported by the right, then never be rolled back and used by both “left” and “right”. I mean, the Jews that control both sides.

    • Agree: nokangaroos
  • I’ve been eating massive amounts of cheese lately. And I’ve been dealing with the skin problems that go along with it. I am in fact on the verge of turning into some type of Cronenbergian monstrosity as a result of the amount of cheese I am consuming. And yet, there is no one who is...
  • All this drug-dealing stuff is probably run by the CIA. South American cartels are just small fish.

    I’m not sure about the legalization of drugs. I think it has bad social effects. On the other hand, the fake “war on drugs” makes the problem even worse.

    Most of the problem of violence in countries like Colombia, Mexico, Brazil and now even Argentina is because drug prohibition allows a bunch of low-intelligence black and brown savages to make insane amounts of money, then buy powerful guns and fight against each other and the police.

    Liberating all drugs and letting people die is bad, but this is probably worse.

    I never liked any drugs (except alcohol and coffee), and I don’t see much their point, but apparently a lot of people enjoy them, probably for the same reason that they enjoy crappy fast food and bad TV shows.

    • Replies: @Montefrío
    @Dumbo


    All this drug-dealing stuff is probably run by the CIA. South American cartels are just small fish.
     
    The CIA plays its part, but "small fish" the cartels are not.

    As for the voyage, long, long ago I sailed from Colombia's Bahia Portete to Florida in what amounted to a straight shot. Were I launching from just east of Aruba, it's a quick hook around Haiti's western coast, cruise through the strait separating eastern Cuba from Haiti's Cap a Fóux, then onward north to southern Florida; under sail, not in a power boat. If they were headed for Trinidad with drugs (unlikely), those drugs were headed for Europe.

    There is a great demand for mood-altering drugs that is nothing new to humanity. The "root causes", as Mr. Putin might say, are domestic in the final accounting and no amount of supposed interdiction will change that fact. If the fabled "heritage American" wants to zone out with possibly fatal consequences, one must first understand why this is before blaming those who would supply them at great profit to obtain wealth, the "American Dream" narcotic par excellence.

    Replies: @JunkyardDog, @A_Hand_Hidden

    , @Eustace Tilley (not)
    @Dumbo

    Excellent comment, especially ¶3.

    Neither you nor Anglin seem to know this, but psilocybin (found in Psilocybe cubensis and some other psychoactive fungi) has shown great promise in curing alcohol addiction.

    To pose the question: "Drugs: good or bad?" is profoundly naive.

    , @ganainm
    @Dumbo

    "All this drug-dealing stuff is probably run by the CIA. South American cartels are just small fish. "


    Very true, unfortunately. Celerino Castillo and Mike Levine, both ex DEA, wrote great books about how Mr Big was always working for the feds. The cartels and the criminals do the donkey work of moving the drugs, but management are State employees.


    Of course, the CIA drugs trade gets subcontracted to locals. Here in Ireland it is (some) of our Garda Siochana and the Pakistanis, plus protection from (most) judges and politicians. Things are so far gone here, that when you say this to our cops in private conversation, they won't even bother to deny it.

    , @Franz
    @Dumbo

    "(Except alcohol and coffee)"

    The first one being the major killer -- and correctly sold legally but with such great controls it is not a serious problem among young people.

    The other legal killer -- tobacco -- is successfully going the same route.

    If they had treated heroin the way they treat cheap wine and malt liquor, you'd never have heard of it.

    , @doclove
    @Dumbo

    Let’s talk about getting rid of prostitution prohibition to sensibly and lightly legalize it or better yet to decriminalize it. Most East Asian nations allow a lot more prostitution than the USA and Canada, but are by far more ferocious in opposing the narcotics use. Most East Asian nations will let you drink a lot of alcohol if you want to. Most East Asian nations are safer than the USA and Canada too and this is especially true in Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Singapore. Most prostitutes especially in East Asian nations such as Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Singapore volunteer to do this line of work and human trafficking is almost entirely a lie being told. I think more men would lessen drinking alcohol and doing drugs if they could more easily and legally get consensual sex from women just like the rats in the second rat experiment where there was more room and opportunity for rats to get sex in the 2nd rat experiment Andrew Anglin wrote about in this article. Sadly, most Americans and Canadians have their heads up their anuses when it comes to sexual matters. I, as an American, do not.

    Replies: @NobodyImportant

    , @showmethereal
    @Dumbo

    The people who actually run the drug trafficking are not brown and black at all. They are small fries …. They don’t own the ships and planes that really transport the bulk. They might own some tractors that transport - but again they are the runners - not the suppliers …. Until the cartels of the 80’s began to let Mexicans share some of the risk - no cartel leaders were even brown

  • One time in Thailand, however many years ago, I was listening to a young lady complain about Chinese people. I had some sympathy to her complaints, as Chinese tourists can be overbearing. On the whole, they spend so much money, it is hardly fair to complain. And the thing about this is: China developed so...
  • What amazes me is how Indians took over whole industries in the US, especially in IT and related fields. I worked for more than one company where it was all Indian names at the top.

    Indians are bad bosses and cheap as hell. They will pay peanuts, but expect a lot. They expect things to be good, quick and cheap, which is impossible.

    And they only promote their own.

    Maybe if China and India get friendlier, that’s a good thing. Anything that sends Indians back to India is a good deal. Or maybe the Pajeets can go to China instead of to Europe, UK, Canada and the US. There’s a lot of empty streets to poop in the new Chinese ghost cities!!!

    p.s. I don’t think it is a religious issue, but a cultural and racial issue, Pakis are as bad as Indians. Different religion, but same people. Although Pakis are probably even lower IQ and don’t rise as high as some Indians do.

    • Agree: ServesyouallWhite
  • Famous dictator of the Ukraine, Vladimir Zelensky, has been wearing a GI Joe style military costume for several years. Although some communist and fascist leaders wore military-type outfits all or most of the time, they were military men before becoming political leaders. It is not normal for a civilian leader of a country at war...
  • When will this goblin and its ridiculous “country” simply disappear from the news? I count the days. I almost miss the Covid era. Time for another psy-ops, Jews, this “war everywhere” is getting tiresome. Maybe the “aliens” one will be funnier? Or an “AI takes control of humans” thing, that could be fun too. Anything but this goblin.

    • Replies: @Mayli and Bootleg
    @Dumbo

    Yup ! That fake "country" was 'formed' in 1991.......it is another USUK manufactured military base

  • Some observers in the lead-up to last week’s meeting between President Donald Trump and President Vladimir Putin in Anchorage Alaska hoped that a dialogue might be established where the broader issue of creating a new European security model that would reduce tensions and make it unlikely that a conflict like Russia-Ukraine would be repeated. Both...
  • @Been_there_done_that
    @Hulkamania


    "They have no possible way of imposing such a choice upon Russia, and if they attempt to do so, they will be annihilated."
     
    Since you have no idea what might be going on behind the scenes you are merely exposing yourself as a rabidly obsessive character, frothing at the mouth with no analytical skills. Therefore your information value is near zero, so you basically function as a cheerleader for others like yourself in an echo chamber.

    To emphasize the validity of my earlier comment above (#44), about the root cause of the ongoing conflict, namely that Russia never really ended the so-called Cold War but merely shifted to a kind of stealth mode while still provoking its neighbors, I should note that the link I provided, for the former White House document of the meeting with Clinton in Europe, also mentions on the same page 4 what the situation was like in January 1994 in the Königsberg / Kaliningrad region.

    The troop concentration of 350000 was said to be the highest in the world. It was considered a problem: "This was a potentially dangerous situation.". While Russian troops were leaving their position in the Baltic countries, they were being reinforced and concentrated in that region, named after a top Stalinist Bolshevik. The point is that it must have been obvious to eastern European leaders in early 1994 that Russia was not relinquishing its long term ambitions, even under Yeltsin.

    What perceived need was there for so many troops to be stationed there at that time? Seven years ago I pointed out that this site that the Russian occupied region of Königsberg / Kaliningrad did not even have a sewage treatment plant. Either Russian leaders did not want to invest much in this territory because they knew that they would eventually have to give it up or it merely reflects a typical Russian attitude of being essentially uncivilized – or both. Here is the article from ten years ago:

    Baltic Sea States Aghast At Russian Exclave’s Sewage Dumping

    June 04, 2015

    Kaliningrad, in terms of water pipes and sewers, is a completely medieval city that pours its waste into the gutter. Just as they splashed it out the window in medieval cities, we throw it out not far from Kaliningrad, in just the same way,” said Aleksandra Korolyova, a Kaliningrad-based activist with the Russian group Ekozashchita (Environmental Protection). “It’s very clearly visible: It’s just a black torrent that pours out of the pipe directly into the lagoon, and the lagoon is part of the sea.

    https://www.rferl.org/a/kaliningrad-baltic-sea-sewage/27053241.html

     

    To be fair, due to pressure and assistance from the more advanced and clean Scandinavians, the region eventually got a sewage treatment plant built two years later, in time for the 2018 Russian soccer championships. Here is a link to the story:

    https://www.nib.int/articles/kaliningrad-inaugurates-long-expected-wastewater-treatment-plant

    Even so, this example shows that from the perspective of corrupt Russian elites, living in filth is not a problem because the population there consists mainly of expendable military types and their families. The primary function of this region is to threaten Europe with batteries of missiles while the Russian propagandists regularly howl about NATO-at-our-doorstep.

    Chauvinist attitudes like yours will ensure that as long as Russians might continue to live in filth under makeshift circumstances in currently run-down Königsberg / Kaliningrad to threaten tens of millions of Baltic neighbors, it will be completely surrounded by well-armed NATO troops, who could theoretically annihilate the area within a day.

    Replies: @Hulkamania, @Dumbo

    Who cares, retard? European countries are doing a good enough job of destroying themselves importing zillions of Africans, Pakis and Arabs and not reproducing enough white people, so in which way being ruled by a “new Russian Empire” would be worse than the current situation? And I’d prefer Putin over Macron or any of the fags and cunts that “rule” Europe right now.

    Not a fan of Soviets, but they may have done the Baltic countries and Poland a favour by occupying them, otherwise today those countries would have a number of Blacks and Arabs comparable to France, Italy and Germany (Former DDR Eastern Germany is still the region that hass less migrants, and yet it has already a lot).

    You freaking JEW.

  • Before his monumental victory against Sergio Massa in November 2023, Milei was an eccentric political analyst who had a flair for controversy and had sharply criticized the Argentine political establishment. Milei made a name for himself by appealing to libertarian principles and even naming his dogs after libertarian intellectual Murray Rothbard. Before 2023, the idea...
  • An interesting exposé of this Elsztain guy, but, you know, it’s not as if Jews were not present also in the criminal Peronist government of the Kirchners. (In fact, they may have been Jews themselves. )

    Remember, Jews always control both sides. Maybe now it’s a Chabad pro-Israeli group versus a progressive secular Jewish movement. I don’t know. But there were lots of Jews in previous governments as well. And of course they are very present in the culture, etc, Argentina has the highest Jewish population in South America (Brazil comes second), and always had. Ever heard of the Zwi Migdal?

    By the way, I think Milei may be Jewish too, he has a strange bio, that certainly hides something.

    More interesting would be to describe what Milei’s policies are doing, or not doing, in Argentina, and whether the country is going to get better or to experience yet another collapse (they happen every 20-30 years in the country, it’s like clockwork).

    But, alas, this article does none of that.

  • The whole ICE thing is just theatre for the MAGA crowd. So they think something is happening.

    Plus, stealing from the taxpayer a few cool billions more.

    And remember, Trump has talked about “legal” migration being good.

    It’s like Meloni, who said she was against immigration and now made an agreement to bring in half a million “legal” Indians, Pakis and Arabs to Italy to “fight a labour shortage” — all the while young Italians have to go abroad to find work.

    What does it matter if they are “legal” or “illegal”? What matters is that they are non-white. If a million “illegal” Swedish blond girls entered the country in boats from Stockholm, no one would complain.

    Well, at least, I wouldn’t.

    It’s easy to stop and reverse migration, if you want. After the Second World War, we saw the movement of millions of people across borders.

    The thing is, the powers that be don’t want to stop it. They just want to pretend they do.

    They really want to replace you.

    • Replies: @Gerbils
    @Dumbo


    What does it matter if they are “legal” or “illegal”? What matters is that they are non-white. If a million “illegal” Swedish blond girls entered the country in boats from Stockholm, no one would complain.
     
    Only the Danish are worse. We have enough prostitutes thank you very much. Now that they have ruined Sweden they will be looking for new places to go.

    Replies: @Trinity

    , @Felpudinho
    @Dumbo


    What does it matter if they are “legal” or “illegal”? What matters is that they are non-white. If a million “illegal” Swedish blond girls entered the country in boats from Stockholm, no one would complain.

    Well, at least, I wouldn’t.
     
    Agreed.

    I was in Lisbon for a few hours yesterday, it's crawling with blacks and Southeast Asians, it's also filthy. If Lisbon, over the last ten years, had been flooded with non-littering, pretty, blond Swedish girls instead of low-skilled blacks from Africa/Brazil and lots of male Pajeets the city would have a whole lot better hybrid feel to it and would be, undoubtedly, a whole lot cleaner.

    The thing is, the powers that be don’t want to stop [third-world immigration]. They just want to pretend they do.
     
    That, in a nutshell, is it.

    The question, of course, is how do we replace these current "Powers that Be" with ones that'll do our bidding and end third-world immigration along with deporting the tens-of-millions of deadbeat, third-world, immigrants who are already here.
  • Andrew Anglin, sitting in his living room I just want to thank everyone and say sorry to everyone. I was given a gift and a lot of responsibility and I didn’t do enough with it. I should have done so much more. I owed you guys more than I gave and I regret so much...
  • Written in the past tense.

    With an apparently real but old picture (But background is AI or Photoshop?)

    What does it mean?

    He’s abandoning writing completely? Well he did it many times recently, but I think a writer can never completely stop writing or having ideas (even if he does not work on them).

    Suicide? He doesn’t seem the type, but well, he seemed a bit depressed or hopeless lately, to be honest. Then again, so am I, and I’m not contemplating suicide.

    Or perhaps it just means he married an Asian lady and is concentrating in work and family.

    Maybe even a Russian lady, that would be awesome. That’s what I would wish for, at any rate.

    Anyway: you were/are an inspiration to many, regardless of your failings.

    Thanks, Andrew.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
    @Dumbo

    Maybe Anglin intends to retreat to a monastery.

  • After day three of complete fasting, you are finished digesting whatever food was left in your belly. At this point, you have energy, even though that is counterintuitive. This is because digestion is one of the most energy-intensive activity your body does. Once your body is finished digesting whatever is left in your system, you...
  • I have alcoholism,

    I have a prostate problem, a liver problem, and crippling depression. I’m expecting this to solve all of these problems.

    Perhaps stopping drinking or reducing it by a lot (i.e. non-Irish levels) could also help?

    At least with the liver thing.

    Good luck.

  • Just so you understand, I am doing an eight day complete fast to try to fix my health and also for spiritual reasons. I believe running this website has completely destroyed my health, and I’m extremely bitter about this. My bitterness knows no end. I’ve also realized that I’ve only created this website for the...
  • My record of fasting is only about 48 hrs.

    This year I fasted on Ash Wednesday for 36 h and should fast again for Easter at least 24h.

    Longer fasts are tough. Although, to be honest, the hardest are the first hours, afterwards you don’t feel it so much. Hunger somehow goes away after the first pangs.

    I might try a three-day fast one day. Eight days seems difficult. But I think Anglin did a five-day fast before. The more you fast, the less hard it gets.

    However, they say fasting shouldn’t be done just for health reasons exclusively (vanity) but for spiritual reasons. Who knows. But I think it’s healthy every now and then.

    Best.

    • Replies: @Mosafer Hastam
    @Dumbo

    Not eating for two or three days is not the same as fasting,meaning to go without food for at least one week. In order to fast, you must first empty your bowels and there are various methods of doing this. When the bowel is shut down, i.e. has nothing to work with, hunger also subsides. During the fasting period you should drink a lot, including electrolytes and diluted fruit juices. My problem with fasting was always the change in the daily routine, because there are no meals and you suddenly have a lot more time on your hands. You should spend it on something you have been procrastinating because you lacked the time. Breaking the fast should also be done carefully, for after all, the goal is health. That’s why I recommend seeking advice from a specialised doctor.

    Replies: @Wielgus

  • The Brutalist is a “visually arresting”[1] mash-up of purloined identities whose only coherence comes from the Jewish revolutionary spirit, which is the film’s hidden grammar. Revolution results in a world turned upside-down, which is what happened to America after World War II, largely because of the Jewish immigrants who arrived as refugees from the Holocaust....
  • @Commentator Mike
    @mulga mumblebrain

    I was wondering if the movie was based on a real person. Thanks for telling us that there was indeed such a person, a real brutalist, who once brutalised a masterpiece of art by one of the greatest artists of all time. But the real Laszlo Toth was a Catholic who believed he was Jesus Christ. Shame he fell into obscurity so we can't follow his life story after his brutal act.

    Fran should write a piece for UR about art, architecture and furniture instead of bombarding us with her ideas about Israel and the Palestinians. It would be interesting to see her point of view given that she is a celebrated modern furniture maker of some pedigree. And then we could all comment in the thread under her article.

    Replies: @Michael Korn, @Dumbo

    But the real Laszlo Toth was a Catholic who believed he was Jesus Christ.

    That’s what Wiki says, but I don’t trust wiki. It’s more likely he is Jewish. Also, I don’t think it is just a coincidence that the creators of this film chose this name for the character. They say “oh, it’s just a very common surname in Hungary”. Maybe, but why exactly that name and surname? And for a Jewish character, too? Jews tend to have specific surnames, unless they change them to hide.

    But it does make sense to give him the name of the guy who tried to destroy the Pietà.

  • @Priss Factor
    @Dumbo

    Christian churches of all denominations, with the possible exception of some Orthodox, are the stupidest garbage institutions in the world.

    Whether it's Francis the Prancis who wants to flood Europe with Africans or that lesbian wench in the National Cathedral who wants to cut off penises of little boys, the whole faith stinks to high heaven.

    Stop with the apologies.

    It's a dead faith.

    Replies: @Dumbo, @Pierre de Craon

    Well, as the Dude says, “that’s just, like, your opinion, man”. And given that you don’t even sign with your own name and I don’t know who you are (you may be Jewish or a Fed, for all I know) I don’t see why I should take it seriously.

    But it’s true that both post-Vatican II Catholic Church and Protestants (from much earlier) have big problems. I’m not even sure I’d consider them Christians, except maybe for a few Trad Catholics (Viganò, etc). The Protestants, I don’t know, they always seemed to be a sort of “Left” of the Church and some denominations are really just Jewish cults, but they have been taken over from much before.

    But nothing has ended yet.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    @Dumbo

    Catholics consume crackers and wine believing it's the flesh and blood of Jesus, ROTFL.

    Why don't they go with donuts and coffee like regular people.

    Replies: @24th Alabama, @Eustace Tilley (not)

  • The US president looked like a gangster as he roughed up Zelensky. But he wasn’t the one who stoked a war that’s killed huge numbers of Ukrainians and Russians If there is one thing we can thank US President Donald Trump for, it is this: he has decisively stripped away the ridiculous notion, long cultivated...
  • I don’t usually read Cook’s unimaginative leftist screeds, but in this case he seems to be mostly right. But I just parsed the article.

    However, I don’t think it has anything to do with “rare earth minerals”, that’s just the excuse du jour. This war has been first about democracy and sovereignty, then about gay stuff, then about farmable land, now it is said to be about “minerals”…

    I think it’s more just that the Ukraine and in particular Crimea are a strategic point for military bases, and US/UK are angry that it was stolen from them. This appears to be Crimean War 2.0, fortunately, they lost this one.

    At this point, no one with any brain cells left likes Zelensky, the aggressive panhandler from Kiev, except the even more obnoxious Starmer and Macron and Leyen, all ghouls. Hopefully he will disappear from the news soon, fake his death and retire to Tel Aviv under a new identity.

    • Agree: chris, dimples
    • Replies: @purrturbed
    @Dumbo


    However, I don’t think it has anything to do with “rare earth minerals”, that’s just the excuse du jour. This war has been first about democracy and sovereignty, then about gay stuff, then about farmable land, now it is said to be about “minerals”…
     
    It's about Full Spectrum Dominance, this has been been official US policy for a long time now. I don't see it get mentioned much, the word hegemony fits but it also conveniently blurs it out. It's part and parcel jewish supremacy too. The US(as a jewish state) needs access to the minerals to maintain this, along with the money, even if it's all secondary to it.

    Replies: @purrturbed

    , @chris
    @Dumbo

    Definitely agree with your points about the “rare earths” being used as a kaleidoscope of distractions to dazzle Trump and the public onto other maybe dead end leads.

    However, in this video, Alex Krainer says that there is a story from a Ukrainian leak, printed in a Check news outlet which claims that UK Stahrmer went and signed a 100-year deal for the Ukrainian rare earths 4 days before Trump’s inauguration.

    Admittedly a kind of cooky story, but one which I think no one would put past the Brits.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ORfzlz6avdg

    Replies: @chris, @anonymous, @ariadna

  • The Brutalist is a “visually arresting”[1] mash-up of purloined identities whose only coherence comes from the Jewish revolutionary spirit, which is the film’s hidden grammar. Revolution results in a world turned upside-down, which is what happened to America after World War II, largely because of the Jewish immigrants who arrived as refugees from the Holocaust....
  • @Priss Factor
    @Pierre de Craon

    Why do you worship a pedophile cult that elects as leader men like Francis?

    Have you no shame? And worshiping a naked Jewish carpenter on a cross and believing all who don't worship him will burn in hell?

    Time to grow up and out of the pedophile cult of the church of crytohomos.

    Replies: @Dumbo, @Pierre de Craon

    I am not fan of the current Pope, but your screeds are obnoxious and stupid, as is everything published by “Freud-Jung”.

    It is trash on a level of the worst Jewish porn stuff. I have no idea why Unz still publishes such trash, as it doesn’t have any sort of intellectual quality nor shows any good writing. Awful, unreadable stuff, which would need an editor to even be understood. (Anglin also would need an editor sometimes, but at least he occasionally manages to be interesting, funny or insightful)

    Your columns and comments remind me of the “Raches” character, who Unz also thought worth of a column, but whom fortunately had the good sense to eventually disappear (he managed to be even worse than Freud-Jung and Revulsky together).

    Then again, Unz publishes a lot of trash, now I basically only read Anglin, the comments, and a few occasional articles.

    • Agree: Commentator Mike
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    @Dumbo

    Christian churches of all denominations, with the possible exception of some Orthodox, are the stupidest garbage institutions in the world.

    Whether it's Francis the Prancis who wants to flood Europe with Africans or that lesbian wench in the National Cathedral who wants to cut off penises of little boys, the whole faith stinks to high heaven.

    Stop with the apologies.

    It's a dead faith.

    Replies: @Dumbo, @Pierre de Craon

    , @Liosnagcat
    @Dumbo


    . . . as is everything published by “Freud-Jung”.
     
    It's Jung-Freud.
  • @Pierre de Craon
    Try to imagine Steve Sailer seating himself in front of Mike Jones's keyboard and writing a review of this abominable film. Impossible, n'est-ce pas? Sailer simply lacks the intellectual ammunition and the moral resources to confront the film's top-to-bottom, start-to-finish dishonesty and obscenity.

    Replies: @Dumbo

    I have never read any review by Sailer that was actually about the movie he just watched. He only uses his “film reviews” to push the same things he always pushes over and over (affirmative action, black women’s hair, blacks running faster, Harvard selections, SAT scores, baseball, NFL, golf, etc).

    Then again, this is a guy who wrote that “Guardians of the Galaxy” was a “great movie”, so I wouldn’t put much trust on his reviews or on his cinematic taste, anyway.

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
    @Dumbo

    Well observed! Everything you say is true.