On that, as a devout Roman Catholic, I agree. Gaudi seems to be mocking the Catholic tradition, not reverencing it.Replies: @The Alarmist, @Dumbo
Sagrada Familia is ugly and a financial boondoggle, a farce.
Well we don’t really know what Gaudi planned as it was only partially completed when he died and he didn’t leave very clear plans. I like some of his civil buildings (basically fancy houses for rich people) but I agree that building a Cathedral is quite different.
I don’t really like it, it doesn’t give you an impression of grandeur as much as confusion. It looks more like something rising from the ground than a building as ending to Heaven.
Still, the best parts of the Sagrada Familia are those actually completed in Gaudi’s time. The modern sculptures, towers and de orations look like a mockery of Gaudi, or worse.
Salvador Dali said back then thai it should have never been completed, just put under a giant glass enclosing.. Perhaps he was right…
No doubt that mass Christianity has faded out in Europe but solid minority Christianity remains – at least in Spain. There’s also a difference from (for example) the UK with regard to the standard Jewish leftist guilt control mechanisms of “racism”, “misogyny” and “anti-Semitism”.Activists have tried to ramp up the Leyenda Negra (Black Legend) of Spanish colonialism in South and Central America and activate the “racist” guilt trip but it hasn’t worked. People of South American origin don’t see a problem. Those of 25-35 years are now approaching 30% of the Spanish workforce and integrate well. As the Spanish say, the 7.000km that separate Spain and Venezuela are less than the 13km that separate Spain and Morocco.
However, the atmosphere in the churches was not particularly religious. Most visitors seemed to be tourists like us, taking photos, and few pious worshippers were present.Secularization seems to have won. Europe now lives in a post-religion era, but I wonder what the replacement is since Christianity has been the source of morality and values for the West.
Those of 25-35 years are now approaching 30% of the Spanish workforce and integrate well.
They are not troublemakers like the Arabs or Africans, but nevertheless they change the ethnic composition of the country. Spain looks more and more like Latin America now. How long it will remain distinctly Spain?
And it’s even worse in the “independentist” regions. Catalans fret about their “identity” but it’s only focused on language. The bulk of the population of Barcelona is formed by Venezuelans, Moroccans, Africans, Pakis, and a few old Catalans dying out.
Argentinians are ethnically indistinguishable from Spaniards
Not really. The typical Argentine is half-Spanish, half-Italian, and has a small percentage of Indian blood (which increases the farther you get from Buenos Aires and other central cities, especially towards the Northern provinces).
The real issue in Spain seems to be the “misogyny” guilt trip. It’s true that Spain was until recently a “macho” society (still is at the lower levels) with women now urgently seeking equality in all things.
Spain is already one of the most feminist countries in the world. No wonder it is also the one with the lowest fertility rate in Europe, even lower than Italy now. Feminism is so over the top, even kissing a lesbian slut is a crime, as that football manager found out.
Our “rulers” have discovered the perfect tool to destroy a society: single women and “women’s rights”. Everything else flows from that. From mass migration to abortion to war in the Ukraine, there is no policy from the establishment that they won’t follow.
Actually, I found this “My Holidays in Spain” essay more interesting than Hua Bin’s usual fare about how “everything in China is better”.
However, I also found curious his observation about the lack of signal coverage in country roads… Does Spain really need ugly and 5G towers all over the countryside? Is being able to watch TikTok videos even in the most remote corners of the Earth so important? Or is this about digital identity and not escaping the AI grid?
Bin also didn’t mention the railway system in Spain, since he traveled by car. High-speed rail is one of the areas in which actually China kicks everybody’s ass these days. Even the previous mighty Germany is so embarrassing today. Deutsche Bahn is chaotic with crowded trains and delays almost every day. Even Italian trains are running better these days, and they don’t even have Mussolini, LOL.
But yes, do tell about your holidays in Cambodia. 😀
A nice travelogue. Roads in Spain are surprisingly good. Or they were when I travelled years ago. But my favorite part of the travel was in the Basque country.
About religion: yes, and unfortunately it’s not just Spain.
I recently visited the Strasbourg cathedral in France, a Gothic masterpiece (and to my mind more beautiful than the Sagrada Familia, which I don’t like so much — Gaudi was a genius but he died much before it was finished, he didn’t leave a plan for its completion, and some of the modern additions to the church are simply awful). But anyway — also in Strasbourg there were no locals and no one praying, just tourists taking pictures, many dressed in completely inadequate clothes.
Of course, we can blame the Vatican II for a lot of that — it basically killed the Catholic Church as a living religion.
And clearly the loss of religion and its substitution by empty secularism and materialism has made Europeans lose the will to live. After all, they are barely reproducing. Most don’t care that their cities are being run over by Africans and Pajeets running scams or pooping in the streets.
Unfortunately, AI and the techno-dystopia so admired by Hua Bin are part of the problem, and are going to make things even worse.
It seems Theodore Kaczinsky was right, after all.
I don’t care much about Venezuela one way or another, but I think Trump will take Greenland, and then fill it with Pajeets and ruin it forever.
Greenlanders seem to be a bit dim, they say they want independence from both Denmark and the U.S., but that option is clearly unsustainable. Their best option is to remain with Denmark.
The U.S. will likely bribe some politicians or fake some referendum and just take it. How could Europe do anything about it? The only other way would be allying with Russia and China, but that is clearly not happening right now.
Then Greenland will become like Hawaii, with a resentful native population surrounded by Ameritards, Mexicans, Indians, Africans, etc… And anyone who wants to go there. Sure it’s cold but so is Canada, and Canada is filled to the brim with foreigners now too.
Of course the Cold War was fake. It makes sense if you think of it not a conflict between ideologies or different powers but as Jews and other inbred elites (“Phoenicians”) at the top on both sides. Which they were.
The best way to control the world is to invent two artificial divisions or sides. It works even today.
Looks too far-fetched to be true. Why would Balzac have written the Protocols?
Also, these type of start of chapter with “short sentences” is merely a summary of the contents of each chapter. This was common at the time, I believe. I’ve seen in it other works.
I think the Protocols are basically a work of fiction (it is too elaborate to be the real content of “meeting of elders”), but it was obviously based on Truth, and probably concocted by Jews themselves. Jews always play both sides, remember. Even against themselves. It may not be be based on notes of a “real meeting”, but it does reveal the real intentions of the Cabal. Revelation of the method.
How many things from the Protocols have really come to happen? Quite a few, I believe. Although of course, they allude not so much to specific events as to ways to obtain power and destroy societies. In a way, a reversal of Machiavelli’s The Prince. A manual to destroy.
Sicilians are mostly Greek, not Moor, much less African (Negro). There is a small percentage of North African DNA, but I think it’s only 2% or less, and Sub-Saharan Black DNA is non-existent or negligible (or was until the recent invasion of Blacks via Lampedusa). Even today they are more similar to the Greeks.
The Moors were in Sicily only for about 200 years and were later expelled, so they didn’t leave a huge DNA trace. Also, the original Moors were actually less dark than today’s Muslims (who mixed a lot with Subsaharan Africans in the following centuries).
Sicily was ruled in the next centuries by the Normans (Vikings) who expelled the Moors, then later by the Bourbons, Savoys, so their aristocracy and their richer classes was always very white. You see that even today.
I’m thinking Sicily had a lot of Jews too, and that may have been the origin of the Sicilian Mafia or Cosa Nostra. But I’m not sure. Although some mafiosos do look Jewish to me.
The rest of Italy of course has basically zero North African DNA, descending mostly from Romans, Etruscans, Sabines, Lombards etc. It’s a mix of different populations, but all of them White/European.
Of course, nowadays almost no one in Italy is reproducing and Africans and Arabs and even Chinese are taking over, and there’s a lot of mixing, so… things change. It’s a pity.
No, they are closer to Anatolians (Turks) : The estimated degree of introgression is in fact not consistent across all areas, with Southern samples experiencing higher Anatolian contribution than Northern samples. A very rough estimation would suggest a 70–90% contribution for the former and 50–70% for the latter. Assuming the Greek diaspora model, South Italian samples should be genetically closer to Greece than to Anatolia, while the Neolithic model would not show significant differences. We note that Dc and Dl genetic distances are linearly related to time. We calculated these genetic distances for WCL, WCP and SAP samples vs. Anatolia and Greece. The three Italian populations were not only closer to Anatolia than to Greece, but all values for Anatolia were smaller than those for Greece. This is confirmed also using more specific regional Greek samples. Assuming proper identification of the source populations, these results suggest that in terms of demographic influence on the paternal Italian gene pool, the role of Neolithic farmers was greater than Greek historical colonisers of South Italy.We concluded that in Italy more than 70% of the observed diversity is distributed along gradients and that Anatolian Farmers did have a different demographic impact on different Italian areas for paternal lienages.The Near Eastern-like ancestry is more frequent in Southern Italy (SSI) and the Greek-speaking islands (i.e. the ‘Mediterranean continuum’), whereas increasing frequencies of the European-like component are observed in Albanians and mainland Greeks as well as in the rest of the Balkan PeninsulaIn most cases, these events depict populations from the ‘continuum’, and particularly the two SSI-clusters (CE-Sicily and AW-Sicily), as a mixture of Sardinian and Caucasus or Near Eastern related groupsThese results suggest that the genetic history of Southern Italian and Balkan populations may have been, at least in part, independent from that of Eastern and Central Europe, involving specific migratory events that carried Caucasian and Levantine genetic contributes along the Mediterranean shores
Sicilians are mostly Greek,
recent studies highlight the possibility of genetic exchange between Europe and Africa. Moorjani et al. (9) estimated that about 1–3% of recent Sub-Saharan African ancestry is present in multiple southern European populations; Cerezo et al. (23) find evidence of older (11,000 ya) Sub-Saharan gene flow toward Europe based on mtDNA genomes; and Auton et al. (8) found that short haplotypes were shared between the Yoruban Nigerians and southwestern Europeans. However, given the geographic barrier imposed by the Sahara Desert between North Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa, and the proximity of North Africa to Europe, it is plausible that gene flow from Africa to Europe actually originated in North Africa. North Africans are significantly genetically diverged from Sub-Saharan populations (24, 25), and hence previous studies may not have accurately estimated the proportion or range of admixture in Europe by using a Sub-Saharan sample as a source population. For example, the Moorish Berber conquest in Iberia began in the 8th century common era and lasted for more than 500 y; this conquest has been suggested as a potential source of gene flow from North Africa toward the Iberian Peninsula. The Y chromosome haplogroup E3b2-M81 distribution is in agreement with recent North African gene flow at that period (26).
not Moor, much less African (Negro). There is a small percentage of North African DNA, but I think it’s only 2% or less, and Sub-Saharan Black DNA is non-existent or negligible (or was until the recent invasion of Blacks via Lampedusa). Even today they are more similar to the Greeks.
Most of those that were expelled were moved to some regions of mainland southern Italy, not to northern Africa.
The Moors were in Sicily only for about 200 years and were later expelled, so they didn’t leave a huge DNA trace. Also, the original Moors were actually less dark than today’s Muslims (who mixed a lot with Subsaharan Africans in the following centuries). Sicily was ruled in the next centuries by the Normans (Vikings) who expelled the Moors, then later by the Bourbons, Savoys, so their aristocracy and their richer classes was always very white. You see that even today.
Correct, Ashkeanzi Jews originate from southern Italy.
I’m thinking Sicily had a lot of Jews too, and that may have been the origin of the Sicilian Mafia or Cosa Nostra. But I’m not sure. Although some mafiosos do look Jewish to me.
I don’t know if anyone posted these links before, but it seems Brigitte rediscovered some kind of Catholic faith in her old age. Whether she repented from her many sins, that is less clear.
https://edwardpentin.substack.com/p/brigitte-bardot-mourned-a-church
https://fr.aleteia.org/2024/09/21/brigitte-bardot-je-porte-la-foi-en-moi-et-jen-suis-fiere/
I didn’t grow up in the 60s or 70s, so I don’t really know how big she was back then. I remember her more for her pro-animal and anti-Muslim later stances.
Did she even make a lot of memorable films? In that sense, Catherine Deneuve seems to have chosen better roles (or was the better actress).
It seems that most were silly things, like “Barbarella”. I personally only remember Bardot in Godard’s “Le Méprise”, which I found pretty boring when I saw it years ago, despite some nice scenes at Casa Malaparte in Capri. Then again, I never much liked Godard.
As for beauty, I don’t think anyone has surpassed the also recently departed Claudia Cardinale, who remained beautiful even into her 40s and 50s.
Oh well.
That was Jane Fonda, another Vadim whore.
It seems that most were silly things, like “Barbarella”.
“Fame, fame, fatal fame, it can play hideous tricks on the brain”, as Morrissey, another animal activist, used to sing. Yes, caring for animals can be in part linked to misanthropy (people who were hurt or disappointed by fellow humans sometimes idealize animals and dislike humans). But not always: sometimes it is an expression of love to all fellow creatures that we share this plane of life with — think Saint Francis, among others. It reminds me of a quote by the fictional monk in Dostoevsky “Brothers Karamazov”:
“Love all God’s creation, both the whole and every grain of sand. Love every leaf, every ray of light. Love the animals, love the plants, love each separate thing. If you love each thing you will perceive the mystery of God in all; and when once you perceive this, you wilt thenceforward grow every day to a fuller understanding of it: until you come at last to love the whole world with a love that will then be all-embracing and universal.”
Thanks, both mini-essays were an interesting read. Better than most comments and even a lot of articles at the UR.
Where do you imbeciles come up with this shite?France is 'filled up' with foreigners from their former fucking colonies, retard. Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia, Senegal, etc.The reason people call out Muslims and not Jews is that Jews are central to Western civilization and have made utterly disproportionate contributions--to science, music, art, philosophy, technology, etc.-- relative to their numbers, while Muslims want to tear down and conquer the West and create an worldwide caliphate. As others have pointed out, the 'Protocols' are a fraudulent, fabricated plan for Jewish world domination, but the Koran is an actual plan to conquer the world.Replies: @Che Guava, @Dumbo, @Michael Korn, @Priss Factor, @36 ulster
She called out the Muslims but not the Jews. Not that it protected her from the globalists eager to fill up France with foreigners.
The reason people call out Muslims and not Jews is that Jews are central to Western civilization and have made utterly disproportionate contributions–to science, music, art, philosophy, technology, etc.– relative to their numbers, while Muslims want to tear down and conquer the West and create an worldwide caliphate.
Jews are a mixed bag. A few good pianists and writers and scientists, but also a lot of pornographers, usurers, etc. They do have some influence, but a lot of it is negative (many prefer to be “destroyers” — as a Jewish author wrote — more than creators) and I wouldn’t exactly call them “central to Western civilization”. Let’s be honest — the Spanish Golden Age started after they expelled all their Jews (and Muslims).
The Muslims… They had some contributions in decorative arts and architecture back in their heyday a thousand years ago, but today, not so much. Perhaps they mixed too much with Africans, or perhaps Islam is just a very problematic religion (some say, created or at least promoted by Jews — the enmity of Judaism and Islam is more fake than real, they have a lot in common). It’s like Hinduism, it doesn’t promote intellectual growth but stagnation.
But it could also be a racial more than religious thing. Who knows. Who cares. Africans and North Africans don’t belong in Europe, no matter what’s their religion. As for the Jews… No idea how to solve that unsolvable puzzle… Maybe bring back the Pale of Settlement?
Here’s my follow up essay:
Here’s an essay I wrote about her:
I remember that back in Chavez’s days a lot of Jews flew away from Venezuela. Quite a few of them went to the US. Perhaps this is their payback?
On the other hand, apparently Maduro is partly Jewish too. So maybe this is Jew-on-Jew, or the whole operation has been staged in some way? Maduro gets some cozy retirement somewhere, and that “Nobel prize” (LOL) gets to play the part of president, while the US syphons all the oil “like a milk shake”.
Who cares about what that fag is, or pretends to be?
Why are most Unz commenters so retarded that they fall for each and every psyop?
Is it because they are mostly retarded boomers?
The problem of modern France is really that their whole nation is based around the ideals of the “French Revolution” and the “Enlightenment” (The “light” here is Lucifer), so, what can you do? The seeds of destruction were planted long ago.
Today they can’t even count how many foreigners live in their country, because of that “Egalité” crap, and the idea that “everyone can become French” as long as you speak the language and eat the right cheeses. And they have a Rothschild’s pet faggot married to a tranny as a supposed leader of the country…
They should reject the whole thing and go back to monarchy, but fat chance of that happening. It will probably become a Muslim country soon, and they will kill and fuck sheep (not necessarily in that order) for their celebrations. Either that, or some African hellhole. A pity. It was a nice, a very nice country, and French women among the most beautiful and charming in the world.
Brigitte Bardot was a feminist, so, in other ways she was also part of the problem, but then again, as I said France’s problems go way way back, so it’s not really her fault.
Lol
If life is a struggle for existence in which the fittest survive
Why do you sign “A.A.”? Is it to give people the mistaken impression that you are Andrew Anglin, or does it simply mean “Alcoholic Anonymous”?
Spencer was an agent of the Powers that Be from the very start. Probably gay too. Just look at his faggy “Hitler youth” haircut. How stupid can people be?
Darwinism is stupid as the basis of a moral “philosophy”. It doesn’t even make sense. What does “survival of the fittest” even mean? It’s a tautology. “Survival of those who are able to survive”.
By that measure. the Africans are the “fittest” as they are the ones expanding and reproducing all over the world now, while white people don’t have children whither and die. Funnily enough, Darwin predicted exactly the opposite. So, not a great prophet.
As for Nietzsche, he was many things, but not a “nihilist”. His “death of God” thing has been extremely misunderstood. Also, he criticized Christianity but, far from being an anti-semite, he actually defended the Jews. So he also must be taken with a huge grain of salt.
Luckily, atheism and Darwinism and the whole edifice of modernity are on its way out. Religion will come back., one way or another. It’s the only chance white people have, to be honest. They rejected God and a metaphysical view of life beyond materialism and thought they could change human nature by social engineering, and this is the price they pay. “The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return.”
That haircut was quite popular with many White football players. At one time, even Christiano Ronaldo, David Beckham, Olivier Giroud and others used to sport such Aryan Hitlerite haircuts.Replies: @Passing by
Just look at his faggy “Hitler youth” haircut. How stupid can people be?
Nah, he’s signing “AA” to make people think he’s Anglin, but I don’t think so.
Crowley? As in Aleister?
Oh yeah, Jared is right. The problem is Blacks in power.
Those damn Blacks controlling the Fed, the banks, Wall Street and Hollywood!
But them Blacks do be sneaky and blame it on the Jews. They smart.
Well, there’s a good possibility that Sailer may be a Jew himself. And if not, he’s an Anglophile, which means a Judeophile, i.e. someone like Derbyshire who has a similar perspective.
Now, I’m a moderate on the so-called Jewish question — I don’t think ALL Jews are bad ALL the time, and there are some Jews that I even like. Their problem is not as individuals but as a group, because of their “religion” (it’s not really a religion, it’s more a cult/mafia thing).
But yeah, trying to suck up to people who behave badly so that they behave better has rarely worked, not with Jews, nor with anyone else.
Holy smokes. Can’t you see? They control both sides. “Republican”, “Democrats”, “Trump”, “Biden”, it’s all puppet theatre for the masses. It’s Jews all the way to the bottom.
Of course the “assassination attempt” was fake, and both sides knew it, and they don’t care. Because they are really the same side. They are also just playing a part in this comedy. It’s all fiction.
Well, I guess this despicable Hindu street-pooper is right in a way, what is an “American”? You could say: the descendants of the British colonizers. But not really. It was a mixed nation with globalizing Freemason ideals from the beginning. A “melting pot of the European races”, as a Jew once put it. Then it naturally became a “melting pot” of non-European races too. (Are Jews American? I guess so, more than anyone else. It’s their country and always was). Still, when it was majority white you could say it had some kind of identity. Now, no longer. It’s just a free-for-all. As they say, America is a business, not a country.
Civil war. Internal wars among the different groups now living in many European countries. for instance, in France, Arabs vs French. Of course, it is possible that the ethnic French will be too old to fight or just not bother, so the war will be Arabs vs Kurds vs Africans. Honestly, I have no idea. I just know that multiculturalism doesn’t work, so it ends either with ethnic conflict or with people migrating en masse and new borders being drawn. At best, it becomes like Latin America, the borders remain and there’s not a civil war, just lots and lots of crime, and cartels or terrorists organizations creating violence all the time.
I suppose Helen of Destroy’s title is taken from this song by the Dead Kennedys. The name of the band is a propos, I am sure JFK and all the other Kennedys eons ago also had similar sex parties. It’s been happening for a while…
p.s. Not that it matters, but I just found out in Wiki that Jello Biafra was at least 1/8 Jewish.
that human emotion, especially fear and shame, can be harvested as an energy source. Monroe called it “loosh.” In modern Gnostic terms, it is the psychic fuel that powers the overlay—the parasitic control-field superimposed upon living reality.
I had never heard the word before, but I am quite sure that the idea of entities feeding on certain emotions, mostly negative emotions, is much more ancient. Devils feeding on pain and vice, etc. In the case of the “elites”, they probably see it as the source of their power. That’s why they keep doing it.
Read this article about Noam Chomsky’s connection, defense, and support for Jeffrey Epstein. I also came across information suggesting that Jeffrey Sachs was on Epstein’s email list of people invited to Epstein Island.
What’s the surprise? All three are Jewish, of course they hang out together.
I think it might not be a bad idea to create a political system led by a scientifically programmed, neutral, democratic artificial intelligence supercomputer government.
Er… Who do you think is going to program that “neutral”, “democratic” Big Bot???
Hey trollface, people, even rich people, don’t socialize all in the same circles (although, granted, their circles are both more exclusive and more international). Yet very different people from very different occupations (arts, politics, tech) gravitated towards the same parties of this guy who (at least in theory) was basically a Nobody. I mean, he was not famous himself, and no one knows how he made his supposed fortune. The conclusion is not hard to reach, he was a pimp that offered the best sex parties for the jet set, but at a price to pay later. Whether people knew the “price” is not clear, but I am fairly certain they knew very well, and they knew they were being recorded while “socializing” (sic) as well. I’m only surprised that they “socialized” with women, I’m sure a large part of them are gay and prefer boys or trans. Maybe that part is yet to surface.
However, Hispanics, Asians, and blacks together now constitute more 40% of the American population.
And this, gentlemen, is how you go from “they are just a few, it would be inhuman to deport them” to “there are too many people to deport”…
However, Trump’s deportation policy is just theatrics.
I don’t really think there is a solution to this mess. I doubt mass deportations at the level needed will happen (and deportations won’t be enough, you would also need a reversal of the negative birth rate of the white population).
Probably at some point there will be a big war and a reorganization of borders along new ethnic lines, both in the US/Canada and in Europe.
It’s a ritual alright, but not necessarily “initiation”. Clinton was already U.S. president, how higher can you get? I don’t think it was exactly blackmail either, but more exactly voluntary blackmail. They knew they were being recorded.
Probably, these people in the so-called elite voluntarily submit to such procedures to keep being part of the group and being promoted. They have their fun, the catch is that if you leave… Well, you can’t leave. Or else.
I think this explains the huge amount of famous people that were connected through Epstein/Ghislaine. Clinton, Trump, Gates, Woody Allen, Mick Jagger, hell, even David Copperfield. It’s almost a who’s who of the rich and famous.
This was also not just a random personal thing, but possibly organized by CIA or some such agency. Ghislaine’s father, Robert Maxwell, was a known Mossad spook. It follows that Ghislaine and Maxwell were too.
What are the odds that this unknown creepy guy with a fortune that has no official explanation was “friends” with almost all famous people?
People with fortunes, famous people socialize?
guy with a fortune that has no official explanation was “friends” with almost all famous people?
But South Park managed to hype themselves with hatred against the show, and I was interested to see where they went with it. It was indeed horrible. It’s all about Trump. Before this season, they’d signed a deal for $1.5 billion for 50 episodes, which averages out to about $1.3 million per minute. Good work if you can get it.
South Park was a thing back in the 90s, or early 2000s, or whenever it was it came out, but I can’t believe it still exists and some people still watch it. Then again, it seems even the Simpsons, which stopped being funny in the late 90s, are still being produced and some people watch it. Very few creators have the dignity (or the talent) of a Bill Watterson, to stop at exactly the right time.
Anyway… it is indeed amazing that the creators of such crap are paid so much. But then again, they are Jewish. Or at least one of them is. Their cartoons became increasingly disgusting and sick until they were simply mental torture.
I haven’t fully read the article, I just wanted to comment on that.
Oh dear. Maybe quitting the daily news was a bad idea? At least that gave you something to do. These “essays” about everything and nothing, and about how Nick is a fake (everyone and his mom knows that by now) I don’t know…
But then again, I can relate. After a certain age and certain experiences, everything seems a bit pointless — especially writing about politics.
In fact, I’m convinced that most people who write about politics do it just for the money. They are some kind of paid actors, really, paid to spew propaganda for one side or the other. No honest person would be in it. Also, you can’t really write well for money, you end up corrupted. I’m no fan of Schopenhauer, he was an annoying prick, and you can’t trust anyone who hates his own mother, but he has a good essay called “On Writing”, which is a bit about that.
Ah, scorpion? Hum, so Andrew’s really in Africa? I would think Southeast Asia more likely. But maybe they have scorpions there too.
Indeed they do. I have even seen one there, but only once.Replies: @HarvardSqEddy
maybe they have scorpions there too.
The economic argument aside, Obama, I mean, Osama was an obvious CIA agent and actor. He had nothing to do with 911 or any of the wars in Afghanistan. He was just a scary face. He was obviously not killed by American soldiers, much less “buried in the sea” (sic). By that time he had probably died a long time ago. He was possibly Jewish too (Laden = Ledeen?). But even if he wasn’t, he was just an actor.
As for military spending, that’s a feature, not a bug. The author has switched cause and consequence. Wars are created for military spending, not the other way around. Just look at the Ukraine, or the U.S. war in Afghanistan in itself: 20 years!!! The wars continue as long as there’s a profit to be made.
China may be the future, but I prefer the past. Historical European towns are the most aesthetically pleasing cities that the human mind has conceived. Too bad many of those are dying or being overtaken by diversity (same thing).
As for modern megacities, good luck to China, but no, thank you.
Just because you have been to European historical towns, but not those elsewhere, does not mean they do not exist....The assumptions you guys make.
Historical European towns are the most aesthetically pleasing cities that the human mind has conceived.
I never read the articles by this Hua Bin guy because they sound as if written by AI (and maybe they are) and because I am not a fan of Chinese triumphalism, but… The topic is interesting.
My impression is that the most high trust society in Asia is Japan. They have their issues, too, of course, but they are high-trust. I don’t see why they don’t appear near the top in this list here, they usually are.
The Chinese are more of a mixed bag. It seems that they don’t have a great image in places like Vietnam, etc. They are seen as pushy and mercantilist. Le Happy Merchant in Asian version, I guess?
That said, my experience with Chinese migrants in the West has been mostly positive. They are hard workers and they are actually helpful when they can. They may never learn the local language very well, but they know how to provide for themselves without becoming a nuisance to the natives as almost all other non-white migrants. Including the annoying Indians.
China has become a cashless society since the early 2010s. Mobile payment is prevalent and few carry cash anymore. Pickpockets and robberies barely exist as a result.
But see, this technocracy stuff is one of the reasons I don’t trust or like China as much as other people. I’m not a great fan “AI” stuff, much less of “digital cash only”. I suppose it may have its uses, but cash is good too. Digital cash is too easily taken away from you.
I mean, everything digital is not really yours. Years ago I had an Amazon account where I published a few books, then I guess one of the books were not to their liking, I don’t really know why as they never explained, they simply deleted my account and all of its content. They never even paid the balance they owed. They said the ToS allowed them to do that. The same or worse with JewTube, who is known for deleting accounts without explanation.
So, basically, if it’s digital and just resting on a server somewhere you don’t really own it, and the same is true of digital cash. See how people had their PayPal or even their bank accounts blocked for being “bad persons” on the Internet, even in the West. Couldn’t it happen in China?
According to:
the most high trust society in Asia is Japan.
This announcement should actually be that this is a bigger bubble than the dot com one by a lot, and though I know nothing about economics, I think when it pops it is going to be something significantly worse than the 2008 crisis. I hear different numbers, but a huge percentage of this economy is now dumb AI speculation, all based on this AGI bullshit. I have no idea how that is going to affect crypto, which is the only thing I care about.
As for the AI bubble. It’s obviously a bubble.
AI can’t deliver any of its promises, except maybe “end all jobs” and “create a prison planet” — but how do these things “help the economy”? And if all AI can really deliver are slightly more realistic sex chatbots, or even dumber, uglier memes, that’s also a fail, so, bubble it is.
But WHEN will it burst? Who knows. I’d say sometime next year. Probably next summer, or by the end of the year. It still has some gas left.
What will happen to BTC? I suppose it will go down too. Unless people see it as an escape from the dollar crash and the gold market is too crowded. Who knows. But it will probably go down too.
I suppose the best thing would be to invest in real estate. Or in physical gold. Well, if you have any money left. If you’re broke, I guess investing in canned food and a place in a bunker somewhere?
Oh well. Let us hope.
There can’t be such a thing as a “evolutionary strategy”, as under its thesis, evolution is completely blind, and free will doesn’t exist.
Also, yes, “might makes right” is its only core philosophy, so there is no way to blame the Jews in that case. They are just performing their “natural” role.
Thank God I am not an “evolutionist”.
Jewalous of his money and fame, maybe (I don’t know). But otherwise, what’s to be jealous of?
I think it’s more resentment and bitterness about the betrayal than jealousy.
Fuentes is obviously an artificial creation, a manufactured personality. To Anglin’s credit, he supported Nick on his site for several years (I remember), until the self-called “cat-boy” started doing some weird stuff like talking to Fed Richard Spencer, leading people into traps such as January 6th, etc. So, I can’t blame Anglin for feeling somewhat betrayed by his younger disciple.
The Ukraine is and was what it name says it was, a Borderland between Poland and Russia. Whether it should be an independent country or not is up for debate, I guess they have at least some historical grounds for it, especially if you consider it was once Khazaria, but the sad thing is, while having little to no difference from Russians — I mean, come on, they may have their own little idiosyncrasies but which are not so relevant to the outside world, and they are at least cousin peoples with the same origin, well, maybe except for the Jews who always live in their own world.
But they could have been like, say, Belarus but they let themselves be used by Jews, Americans and Eurotrash as a battering ram against greater Russia. The objective is the same as always, to retake strategic Crimea, but they failed big this time.
Another issue about the Ukraine, which makes it similar to Kosovo and other artificially created or NATO-supported “countries” (Kosovo is of course not a real country) is the insane amount of corruption and sleaziness that it has.
The pre-war Ukraine was basically known for:
-prostitution and export of prostitutes to Western Europe;
-surrogacy (selling babies to international homosexual couples who would rape the children);
-organ trafficking, probably mostly to Israel;
-all kinds of shady deals with crooked Western politicians (see Burisma, etc.)
-drug route to European markets;
In this sense, it’s good to see it go. Anyone supporting the Ukraine is basically a supporter of such status quo of sleaze and corruption and wanted to keep it as a shady-deals, baby-selling, organ-selling industry for the West.
By the way, I remember discussing once with an Ukrainian living abroad who was a rabid defensor of the Ukraine — turns out he worked with porn production and was an extremely sleazy person. (I don’t think he was Jewish, even though most porn production is Jewish,)
Anyway, I may be biased as I don’t have a very positive image of Ukrainians, almost all the ones I met were somewhat trashy, while my contacts with Russians abroad have been somewhat better, even if Russians have their problems too.
The same part as in Italy, Greece or Turkey. Just like a country doesn't have to be in Europe to participate in Eurovision, it doesn't have to border northern Atlantic to be in NATO. Ukraine probably should've been allowed in, but it wasn't because spineless Euro nations didn't want to antagonize Russia ... and how did that work out for them?
What Part of Ukraine Borders the North Atlantic, Anyway?
There are many ignorant comments in the UR, but yours probably beats a record — so much ignorance concentrated in one brief comment! Paraphrasing what someone said of Lilian Hellmann, everything you wrote is stupid, including “the” and “a”.
Who asked you? And your name is “Anon” because no one knows who your father is?
Whatever! Bye!!!
I don’t get the analogy here.. Seinfeld was always the least funny character in the series… His starting monologues were always lame (on purpose?) and he couldn’t act…
I always thought he was unfunny on purpose to act as a foil for the others.
Then again, Kramer burned himself after that comedy show where he said “nigger” too many times… So, maybe there’s the analogy with Anglin. While Seinfeld continued making shows (even if unfunny ones).
I never had time for Fuentes, back then or now. I really don’t see the appeal of the guy. Actually he reminds me a bit of Zelensky, maybe because both seem to be on cocaine all the time. Only that the drug turns Zelensky into a whiny downer, and Fuentes, into a manic blabbermouth.
Sorry, we don’t want any more Muslims or, even worse, Americans in Spain/Italy/etc. They tend to ruin everything.
Americans (and Brits) have ruined Florence and Ibiza, and that just as tourists.
Imagine if masses of them decided to move permanently to Spain as residents and transform the places into California or New York. The horror, the horror. I think even the invasion by hordes of Muslims might be a less horrific destiny.
What Spain needs is for Spanish people to have babies again. It might seem impossible, but just 60 years ago people in Southern Europe (when the countries were still actually Catholic) were having 7, 8 children. It can happen again.
An army of infants in the War of the Womb? That would be a dreadful disaster for Spanish quality of life. Maybe you'd be happier if you move to Africa:
What Spain needs is for Spanish people to have babies again. It might seem impossible, but just 60 years ago people in Southern Europe (when the countries were still actually Catholic) were having 7, 8 children. It can happen again.
I’m not sure if you are really a Muslim convert or just some sort of propagandist, and honestly I don’t really care, but race and culture are not religion and Mediterranean =/= Muslim.
In fact, Mediterraneans are usually thought of as Greeks (Orthodox) and Spaniards/Portuguese and Italians (all Catholic), not North Africans. But even North Africans were Christian once.
I don’t really have all that much against Muslims, as long as they stay in their countries, I just don’t want them invading Europe (again). Is that too much to ask? What’s wrong with Morocco, Syria, etc? You have nice beaches. Stay there.
Will the Spanish have to start Reconquista again to expel the Saracens? (But I guess the Jews have got to go first, then as now).
Yeah, it’s a Leftist (“secular”) country today, it doesn’t mean they want to become Muslim.
What is it with you Muslims wanting to invade everyone else’s countries, huh?
Spain expelled all you guys once, it can still do it again. Of course, Leftists/Jews have to go first.
Same old, same old.
Piss off, Spain is a Catholic country.
WTF!! It’s all we needed! As if we didn’t have enough Muslims in the West!!
Anyway, this is stupid advice and a stupid “solution”.
Arabs in Spain talk Arabic among themselves, just as they do in Germany, France, etc. So you’d need to learn it anyway.
Two, they won’t let their women just marry some random non-Arab speaking non-Muslim foreigner. And how would you get close to the women anyway?
Plus, most of their women are ugly and fat. That’s why they use a burka. And they are not necessarily less consumerist or more modest than Western women (except for the hair stuff). Really, you see a lot of these Arabic women with a veil but Nike shoes and fake Gucci bags.
Finally, due to mass tourism, houses in Spain are not cheap at all! Unless maybe you move to some Moroccan crime-ridden ghetto in the Raval, maybe. But even there, I don’t think so.
Some solution!!!
Good article. 50-year mortgage seems actually worse than just renting it. It’s just the illusion that you ill own something, some day. (But then, it already is, with property taxes and so on).
Isn’t it funny that Covid policies basically decimated the small businesses and the middle class, while enriching the Bezos and Zuckerbergs of this world? A transfer of billions from poor to rich.
But now, Trump’s policies such as crazy tariffs and “50-year mortgages” do the same, benefit the rich and the bankers, while destroying small businesses and the middle class.
Some say, “tax the rich”, but that’s just silly. The rich — the (((rich))) ? — own the government, or vice-versa, anyway, it’s the same people, so they would simply be paying themselves with your own money, as they always do.
As Anglin points at the end, we would need a complete restructure, the whole order needs to crash in order to be fixed.
However, I think that this is more than just a social and political issue, it’s a, let’s say, spiritual issue. Until modernity/hedonism/consumerism and all its attendant evils are rejected, rejected by the people themselves, everyone will still be trapped in the same rat labyrinth, in the same “mouse utopia”.
And, contrary to Anglin, I think it may also include rejecting robots/AI to some extent as well. Technology is not always good, in fact, in the last 30 yers or so it has been mostly bad. AI is mostly just a scam, anyway, it will never fulfill the techno-utopians fantasies.
Eat the rich. It's the only way. It's not like we can nuke the whole thing from orbit and start over somewhere else. We either remain their slaves, or we remove them.Replies: @Eustace Tilley (not)
Some say, “tax the rich”, but that’s just silly. The rich — the (((rich))) ? — own the government, or vice-versa, anyway, it’s the same people, so they would simply be paying themselves with your own money, as they always do.
Where’s Anglin’s new article about Trump’s “50 year mortgage”? That’s a good one.
Or maybe, just maybe, Jews and “Nazis” were in cahoots?
There are Jews in basically ALL political movements, so why not Nazism too? Of course they usually prefer the left and the bolsheviks, but they were among the fascists too. Probably playing and financing both sides, as they usually do.
Today they are in the AfD and most “right-wing” parties in Europe, for instance. In “The Spider’s Web”, by Jewish author Joseph Roth, written before the war, we have a Jewish man who supports a right-wing nationalist in the hope of seeing war and the destruction of Europe. It’s all there.
So the most obvious answer to the author’s question is that Jews were Nazis too, and the Holohoax was yet another false flag. Hitler himself was probably a “kike”, as several other elite Nazis were confirmed Jews, such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmuth_Wilberg
Also, this old article about relatives of former Nazis somehow becoming Jewish Zionists is interesting:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/aug/06/judaism.secondworldwar
Perhaps Nazi Germany’s (and the war) real purpose was to provide the groundwork for the establishment of Israel?
I know little about Mandani or his policies, and, not living in NY nor anywhere near, I don’t care. But I am not a fan of rent control policies in general. They led to abuse and distortion.
That said, I guess whoever wins in NY is who gets the most rabbis on their side?
https://twitter.com/ZohranKMamdani/status/1985106439728160937
I just perused the article — it’s way too long given its subject and it seems a bit of a waste of time to read so much about Katy Perry, a fake personality and fake musician who faked even a rocket trip.
I don’t think anyone should waste so much time on such trite subjects.
But a few of the pictures are interesting, especially that album cover of that “former Disney child star” (of course) promoting sexual degeneracy and race-mixing…
Of course, if you really look for it there are even worse things. Contemporary music sold to teenage or pre-teenage girls is basically soft porn (in lyrics and visuals) mixed with satanic imagery. It’s really worse than you could possibly imagine.
Looking back, surely there were also bad things in the 80s/90s when I grew up, but nothing as bad as there is today, both in terms of musical quality and lyrics and in terms of degeneracy. In fact, a lot of the music of the 80s/90s seems downright naive these days.
I didn’t have time to edit the previous commentary. Of course (if real) there would be a scientific value in a human landing on the moon. However, besides clowning around (and playing golf!) they didn’t do much, and all they brought back were a few “moon rocks”.
Supposedly, because a few of those turned out to be fake, too.
Here also a story about a “moon rock” given by president Nixon to a Dutch Museum that turned out to be just petrified wood (yes, from the Earth — there are no trees on the Moon).
Watch out, there’s nothing that “men of UNZ” [TM Alden] boomer readers hate more than being told that the Moon landings were fake, as it is considered the pinnacle of White Men’s Civilization (only it isn’t).
I myself am neutral on the issue, although there are many valid doubts about the Moon project. I watched about half of Mazzucco’s documentary, he makes some good points, others, not so good. David McGowan’s book “Wagging the Moondoggie” is good too.
Lately we found out we have been lied to about so many other events (9/11, Charlie Kirk, etc), so what if the Moon Landings were also not what we were told?
But I tend to think it’s fake for a simpler reason — the only use of the Moon Landings was as a propaganda coup, to say “we won the space race”. It had no scientific or economic value, and in fact we never went there again. It was just a media thing.
So, why risk the lives of men and zillions of dollars (and the real possibility of failure as the whole world watched) by taking the trouble to actually going to the Moon, when you could film it all here on Earth, and obtain the same or better results?
It’s not as if anyone was on the Moon before (of after) and could compare.
what’s wrong with vodka?
If you are asking seriously, in context, we remember that Dostoevsky wrote his comment sometime around 1873. The author surveyed the lower class working/peasant landscape, observing wide-spread alcoholic drunkenness, along with all that goes along with intoxication. As if the will to live itself was being drowned out of the Russians.
what’s wrong with vodka?
There is a chapter on that Diary of a Writer which is called “The Jewish Question” and is pretty interesting, to say the least. He’s not completely unsympathetic to the Jews, but he’s not blind either. That said, I don’t think he suggests that Jews should be expelled from Russia. In fact, I think he even argues for extending full rights to the Jews (which at the time had to reside in the Pale of Settlement), but is skeptical that it would work, with the Jews being, well, Jews.
I wonder if First and Second World War were like this too… The Usual Suspect banging drums for a war that no one else wanted or cared for. Except for the Hohols, who have a constant chip on their shoulder an don’t want to be Russians or maybe even Slavs (I guess they think they are German), who cares if the Ukraine belongs to Russia or not?
I mean, for decades the Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union, and no one cared. It didn’t make any difference to anyone in the West. Then it got independent and it was a mess — for them, it still didn’t make much difference in the West, except for those interested in traffic of sex slaves and body organs.
Its best best was to chill and become like Belarus, an independent country but friends with Russia, if not to apply to be part of the Russian Federation. But no, they wanted to be part of the West/EU, just as the West was starting to unravel through immigration, consumerism, gay stuff, etc.
Now the West is supporting the losing side in this war that interests NO ONE except certain politicians who profit from, I suppose, organs and sex slave traffic and other shady deals.
And a war that could have ended years ago is prolonged until who knows when, and the Usual Suspects would be very glad if it became a true hot World War between NATO and Russia.
But other than them, who cares? European countries have enough problems with brown migrants selling drugs on their parks, white people not reproducing and the economy going down the tubes.
Who in his right mind would want a war on top of that?
I would add that Europe doesn’t even have the soldiers for this war (unless they plan to forcibly draft the migrants) , but I guess they dream of a drone and missile war that will be run by AI and will kill mostly civilians.
I guess it’s always like this — Politicians and bankers and the Usual Suspects are the ones who love wars (not having to fight them), average people, not so much.
The hint is on the name “Crowley”, a known satanist and spook. Maybe crypto-Jewish too, like fellow Satanist LaVey, not sure.
This Banania guy is one of the dumbest, cringiest, most dishonest, most useless grifters in the whole blogosphere, and that’s saying something. I first heard of him in a Steve Sailer post (Sailer has a tendency to like and admire useless people that get media recognition, because that’s what he dreams of), and after a few lines realized he had nothing interesting to say, even back then.
I have no idea who reads him. If it was up to me, he and all the influencers like him would be in the unemployment line or turning tricks to survive.
Well, in a way, thats what they do.
I have made up my mind some time ago that Christianity is part of the problem, not of the solution.
Then I wonder what is the “problem” and what is the “solution”. (Personally, if he means the “Jewish problem”, I think there is no “solution”, nor even a “final solution” — there is no “solution” to human problems on this plane of terrenal existence.)
When he distanced himself from all the suspicions directed as Israel in the assassination of Kirk,
Kirk is not dead, it was a hoax. He was/is an actor, as is his fake wife and their non-existing prop children.
Interestingly, I used to support Nick’s critics of Candace, whom I felt was doing great damage to herself and to here followers with the Brigitegate thing, but since Kirk’s assassination, I have gained a lot of respect for her.
I don’t follow Candace, and I think she’s as suspicious/astroturfed a character as Nick, but I think she’s more right on Brigitte being a man than on Kirk’s “murder”.
He may be on drugs too, and then there are rumors of his homosexuality.
Cocaine? Perhaps. Many people who talk a lot for a living seem to take huge amounts of cocaine (i.e. Zewlenski). As for he being gay — I don’t know. People today talk as if anyone who is/was not married is a fag. Every historical character is turned into a supposed fag, from Caravaggio to Da Vinci, with little proof. He may really be just celibate. He’s not particularly attractive for females, despite his fame, that’s for sure, even Anglin probably gets more female interest than Nick does (well, from cheap Asian and Filipino whores, but still).
I never paid much attention to Fuentes. I watched maybe a couple of videos. I don’t know, there’s always something that seems off with him. But in general, I don’t watch many videos, I prefer to read, so I can’t give a very deep view.
In such type of “blame-the-Jew” videos, I much prefer Bro Nathanael. He was pretty funny. He seems to have disappeared lately, although he still has some videos up on Rumble.
I remember back in the day that Anglin would sing the praises of Nick, and then a couple of years ago or so he publicly reneged him when he associated with Richard Spencer and other dubious characters. Anglin was right, of course. Spencer is trash, and Nick is suspicious too.
It’s true, Nick associates with strange characters and is strange himself. I’m not sure what’s the endgame or why he is being propped up. But he’s obviously being propped up lately.
I don’t know if he’s actually gay, who knows, but he’s no Di Caprio, and the mainstream media now trying to sell him as a sex symbol is indeed pretty weird.
Maybe move to Ukraine and find a wife.
Better a Russian wife. It seems Ukrainians are basically whores and only care about money, while Russians tend to have a bit more personality, although many are gold diggers too. Second, they are used to vodka drunks, so would have no problem with an Irishman’s alcoholism. Also, if you’re pro-Russian, it’s better to find a Russian (or Belarussian) wife. And finally, Ukraine is not just a dump but in the middle of a war, so why would anyone move there when most are trying to get out? While Russia is more prosperous and has something called the Shared Values Visa — basically you just need to prove that you’re not a criminal neither a drug addict nor have AIDS, and you get it. I think Anglin and even many UR commenters (not all) could qualify.
Better a Russian wife. It seems Ukrainians are basically whores and only care about money, while Russians tend to have a bit more personality, although many are gold diggers too.Where do you live? It is common sense in America that a Russian mail order bride is a bad idea. Every year there is a news report on one murdering her husband or robbing him blind. It's always some fat White conservative in the burbs who thinks he can land a 27 year old Russian model. I see no reason to assume that Russian women are better than Ukrainian. Russian women in the US are known to be materialistic. I know someone who is married to one and she completely fits the stereotype. She spends a ton of money on designer labels and requires an annual vacation to some resort destination. I suppose she is at least good looking and in shape. I'm amazed by how many men will marry a homely woman that is demanding. Also, if you’re pro-Russian, it’s better to find a Russian (or Belarussian) wife. And finally, Ukraine is not just a dump but in the middle of a war, so why would anyone move there when most are trying to get out?Russia is a dangerous place for all Americans. There was a pro-Russian youtuber who joined the Russian side and was literally buttraped before being killed. They thought he was some type of agent even though he had fought on the DPR side since 2014. Some Texan who made youtube songs about how much he loved Russia. Ukraine will be the better place when the war is over. It will be flowing with all kinds of Western contracts. Russia could have an economic collapse if the people are demoralized like Weimar. Even if they most likely take a chunk of Ukraine it could lead to a depressed period as the people realize their state media was lying to them. The state media depicts Ukraine as about to collapse at any time. They Russian people are expecting a complete surrender by Ukraine.Russia will also have a few hundred thousand angry veterans and that includes criminals that had their sentences commuted. Not a good place to have an American accent.Replies: @Commentator Mike
Maybe move to Ukraine and find a wife.
also disproving, in my view, speculations of a fake death, which I wrongly defended in an earlier article
LOL. For once that Laurent was on the right track for something… He changes his mind. 😀
Honestly, I don’t get the “Israel did it” crowd. I mean, first, the guy was an über-Zionist who even kept Jewish Sabbaths (even though being nominally “Christian”), and, second, he was just an activist, a propagandist, with no real power to do much. Why would anyone kill him? Of course, the theory that he was killed by a tranny lover seems even more far-fetched. He probably didn’t die, and is now in “Valhalla” (nudge nudge, wink wink).
I haven’t read the article, just the title and word count, and the title was already too long. It seems that Priss hasn’t learned how to write readable articles, even with the help with ChatGPT. In fact it reads like ChatGPT (which I hate).
But it could all be easily summarized with two lines of a known meme:
– So… Spencer was a Fed?
– Always has been.
Maybe, but I am not sure if things would have turned out all that differently.
Catholic hardline Franco kept Spain on the leash for a while, but what happened? Right after his death Spain went fully-left and today it is one of the most leftist countries in Europe, and one with the most Africans and Arabs and other migrants. Also among the most rabidly feminist ones, together with the Scandinavian ones.
In an ironical twist of fate, it was the evil Communists (Judeo-Bolsheviks) who protected (Eastern) Europeans (for a while) from most migration and the excesses of consumerism, feminism, etc, while the Western side went full-Weimar. Law of unintended consequences?
On the other hand, perhaps Hitler was “hired” to lose the war and provide the “reason” for Israel, and that’s why he was allowed to get to power. A sort of Trump of its day? Managed collapse of Germany/Europe? I don’t know… But he did have a few Jews among his higher-ups and financiers.
I don't know, it's complicated.
In an ironical twist of fate, it was the evil Communists (Judeo-Bolsheviks) who protected (Eastern) Europeans (for a while) from most migration and the excesses of consumerism, feminism, etc, while the Western side went full-Weimar. Law of unintended consequences?
This is one reason why there’s so much overlap between white supremacism and Christian fundamentalism, by the way. White supremacists understand that they can’t have wealthy, educated women choosing when they do and do not reproduce, because it turns out having and raising children is a massive ordeal and a woman with rights and resources will only sometimes feel safe and supported enough to do it. So they need to find ways to turn them back into a man’s property and force them to churn out white children.
This is also a lot of the drive behind all the tradwife stuff, the incel stuff, the anti-abortion stuff, and the “your body, my choice” rape apologia you see on the far right. White supremacists are searching for ways to bump up white birth rates against the wishes of women. White supremacism is unworkable without male supremacism.
So, basically, Mrs, Johnstone is admitting that the “incels” and “white supremacists” and people like Anglin are indeed right: births are declining because of women’s rights. Women, when having the choice, don’t want to have children. That is really the bottom of it (although there are arguably other causes, such as vaccines, chemical stuff on air/water, climate fearmongering etc).
They understand that automating society is the only way to stave off the future wave of immigration that will otherwise be necessary to keep civilization functioning.
First of all, the “wave of immigration”, in particular from Africa and North Africa, will not “keep civilization functioning”. It will destroy it completely. They do not care about (European) “civilization”, and even if they did, they wouldn’t be able to maintain it. They will turn Europe into a giant favela. That supposedly smart people such as Johnstone cannot see that is astounding.
But also, the same people pushing the automation crap are basically the same people pushing migrants. Both are ways to reduce labour costs and make the rich richer (and, incidentally, the poor poorer).
Eventually they start intermarrying with the white population, and before long humanity consists of lovely shades of tan.
Johstone pushing for the Kalergi plan? Who would have guessed…
I guess there is no hope. I sympathize with Mrs. Johnstone on some aspects, but in the end, it seems she’s okay with the planet becoming a “brown utopia” (which it will never be — Brazil is what you get).
By the way, there’s no such thing as “White supremacism” (it’s white survivalism at this point), much less “Christian fundamentalism” (even the recent Popes are all on board with globalism, and protestats are worse).
She's not pushing it, she's simply describing the world as she sees it. Given our present circumstances, working class people don't want to go through the hell on earth that is parenthood + grinding poverty. Is that selfish? Well, yes, but it's also human.
So, basically, Mrs, Johnstone is admitting that the “incels” and “white supremacists” and people like Anglin are indeed right: births are declining because of women’s rights. Women, when having the choice, don’t want to have children.
Johstone pushing for the Kalergi plan? Who would have guessed…
That Kirk’s “death” was a staged hoax to cause public trauma IS the simples explanation.
No need to conflate aliens or lizards or criticize all “conspiracy theorists” by association.
It is not all that complicated to create such fake events, and it has been done many times before.
Does anyone believe in the official stories of Sandy Hoax? The Holocaust? 9/11? October 7?
It seems you misunderstood my comment?
I and millions of other Britons, some of them Jews, have been grieving for much longer – over the killing of tens of children in Gaza not on one day last week but on every single day, without break, for two years. And yet no politicians or media seem to think it important to respect my grief.
Are you a Palestinian? If not, then it is not “your grief”, and they are not “your people.” You’re just a virtue-signaller, like most white people (leftists).
I mean, I understand, it’s terrible what’s supposedly happening to the Gazans, and I suppose it’s interesting that Jews are starting to be hated by basically everyone (again!) these days.
But still, I wonder if Mr. Cook would be so sad if was white Britons being killed? Perhaps he would say that they deserved it, for being colonizers or whatever?
This is the part of the leftist mentality that I don’t get at all. “Brown people good, white people bad.”
P.S. That “synagogue attack” was likely a hoax or a false flag.
Finally, I don’t think Jews are grieving all that much. Antisemitism is “good for the Jews.” This is what most people don’t understand.
The book of Ariel Toaff is interesting.
There is also the killing of a Catholic priest to use his blood in rituals, a more recent case that is well-documented (I think 19th century).
I don’t think such ritual killings were very common, but they happened.
Judaism is strange, because, in general, or in most religions, the more religious you are, the better or wiser and more tolerant person you are or tend to be. But with Jews it is the opposite, many secular Jews can be nice people (although usually tending Left), but religious orthodox Jews are very much anti-Goyim and very aggressive. (well, maybe Islam is similar in this sense, they have their fanatics too).
Religious Jews are very anti-Christian and against any kind of communion with gentiles (but most especially Christians). They get along better with Islam.
Secular Jews, are not so much personally anti-Christian or anti-Goy. Perhaps because of their ignorance of their “religious” texts (Talmud).
The problem of Judaism is basically religious. Once their religion is gone and they all convert (sincerely) to Christianity (or to Islam, or Buddhism, if they prefer), the problem is more or less solved. (but there is the issue of cryptos, so there’s that, they are good at hiding).
With Islam, the true-believers are the Jihad killers, clearly the most intolerant and evil of all religious followers in world history. There is no other religion that comes remotely close to the evil Islam inspires. Islam states that Muslims who do NOT engage in Jihad are hypocrites. Evil is the norm, the expected state, for a true Muslim.Replies: @Passing by, @John Trout
in general, or in most religions, the more religious you are, the better or wiser and more tolerant person you are or tend to be
Not entirely true. Zionism began as a secular project, not a religious one. And even here, ethnic cleansing and Jewish supremecy were its earliest goals. Essentially, Zionism/secular Jews embody the misanthropic spirit of the law, if not the letter (rituals, dietary laws etc).But I agree with the overall thrust of your post. Judaism does make a people terrible. The Greeks, Romans, and Egyptians had very little praise for Jews, and 2000 years later, modern Jews are just as appalling despite being descendants of converts to Judaism that had no cultural or genetic ties to ancient Israel. So we're seeing new populations embrace Judaism and become just as misanthropic as their predecessors.Replies: @Rurik
But with Jews it is the opposite, many secular Jews can be nice people (although usually tending Left), but religious orthodox Jews are very much anti-Goyim and very aggressive. (well, maybe Islam is similar in this sense, they have their fanatics too).
Stupid. Since when Trump has cut anything that really matters?? He even put a hindu-dindu as FBI director. I doubt Andrew was getting money from USAID, or, if he was, that Trump would cut it.
I think it’s just what he said it was. He’s just not into it so much anymore, and I can understand. I am also less interested in reading about politics. In fact, I couldn’t care less. It’s all theatre.
It's a deadly theatre and dark days are coming. Actually it's even more reason to get interested and involved countering their evil deadly plans.Replies: @John Johnson, @Same old same old
I am also less interested in reading about politics. In fact, I couldn’t care less. It’s all theatre.
There’s a fourth (or fifth) possibility: no one died, it was all a hoax and he’s in Tel Aviv having gay parties. His fake wife will continue the scam, collecting money from the clueless MAGA hats.
Forget it, Jake. It’s Hymietown.
Global governance, eh?
Sorry Pepe, that doesn’t sound as exciting to me as it sounds to you.
I guess we get an global government (and AI, digital cash, health passes, etc) with the Americans, but also with the Chinks.
Any way you look at it you lose…
I guess Mr. Kaczinsky and the Luddites were right. The enemy is modern technology (and those who use it to control us).
Yeah, I noticed that too. “Cui bono” is usually translated in English as “Who benefits?”
I struggled to understand what the author meant at first, not realizing it was a weird literal translation of the famous Latin phrase.
As for the answer to the question, “who benefits”, well, this whole operation and fake assassination appears to have been created to create even more division between fake “left” and fake “right”. I think Kirk is in gay parties in Tel Aviv together with Epstein and a few others.
Like most celebrities, be it in entertainment or politics, Charlie Kirk was basically an actor playing a role. He’s not “real” in any way, just as his death was probably not “real”. Just look at his supposed children, who have no name or face, being held like props by the supposed couple.
Nick Fuentes, probably the same thing. A manufactured personality to be used when the time comes.
I don’t know, I just don’t trust any of those “young leaders”, either in the left or on the right. But mostly those on the “right” appear to be Feds or connected to the Feds — Richard Spencer, Gavin McInness, how many more examples do we need?
Basically nothing in modern politics is real. It’s worse than Hollywood, where there’s also brainwashing but at least they admit it’s all scripted and played by actors.
Well, I don't know about that, but it's fairly obvious that immigrants don't riot or break store fronts, and are far less of a military threat than the far left. And still, Anglin has made a career out of verbally attacking immigrants.Replies: @Dumbo
They can riot and break some store fronts. But they are not a massive military threat.
a) There are millions times more immigrants that there are trannies or leftists.
b) They may not be a “military” threat, at least right now, but what’s the difference? They are population replacement, which is worse. Most leftists at least are white (in fact, you’d be surprised at how white (and Jewish, but that’s another story) leftists are. Other races in general don’t fall for that “kumbaya we are all equal” stuff.
Not just that, it is impossible to reproduce conscience. “AI” is not real “intelligence”, and machines (almost by definition) cannot have a conscience.
I think the idea of all these rich people is to store all their brain information in the case that someone in the “future” finds out how to bring it back to life — just as they do the same with their bodies, via cryogenics, or other similar technologies.
It seems to be a dumb idea, better to accept that you grow old and one day you die.
Or maybe they want to die simply because they are afraid to go to Hell?
Pretty good article, especially the fight between the “right” (MAGA) and the “left” (Antifa), which is what is mostly what is being promoted by this event — further radicalization of both camps.
The only thing I probably disagree — the event itself is not real. Or, at least, I don’t think it is.
Of course, in the age of AI and total media control, we can no longer know if anything is “real” or not. (Anglin wrote about this “singularity” another time.) Hell, we can’t even know for sure if “Anglin” is still alive or this is being written by AI or someone else.
But, my two cents, after watching a few videos and reading about it, is that he whole thing was staged, maybe with a blood squib. Charlie Kirk is an actor as is his supposed wife. They don’t have real children together and he may be gay. (At least, that’s the vibe I get for the weird videos she published, and the absence of the children with her). The “shooter” Tyler Robinson was acting too.
Most people will say that this is impossible, a conspiracy theory, etc, but, well, Hollywood does this all the time. And we know that at least some of the events which were previously sold as “real”, in the end, weren’t, or at least weren’t what we were initially told (i.e. Sandy Hook, Trump’s shooting, among others).
Naturally you'e aware ol' Bill Clinton was sterile, as he mollified one of his rape victims by saying she had no risk of pregnancy as he had the (mumps?) as a youngster. Like all (pretend) good respectable people trying to appeal to the dull masses tho they needed a nuclear family so lez Hillary got impregnated by Web Hubbell, as the story goes. But again, acting. All a show for the theater of the mind.
In ancient Rome, actors (histriones) were considered infames — a legal and social status of disgrace. Because of this, they were barred from testifying as witnesses in court, along with others of disreputable status such as prostitutes, gladiators, and pimps.
This restriction came from Roman ideas of honor and credibility: the belief was that people who made their living through performance, spectacle, or morally suspect trades were untrustworthy and lacked the dignity required for legal testimony.
Beneath their every presentation lies a palimpsest, its faint script whispering the same timeless impulse: to subvert, to parasitize, to control...
"Not only is the universe stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine".
Sir Arthur Eddington
But if there was another shooter — where was him? Some say one of his bodyguards from behind, but that seems to make even less sense.
That he was killed by/because of Israel is only slightly less absurd that the official story that he was killed by a (supposed) random leftist with 4.0 GPA, conservative family, and a supposed tranny or furry boyfriend.
The easiest solution to the enigma is — he wasn’t really killed, it was all staged. There are many videos showing how it could have been done. Sure, it was done by professionals — Hollywood professionals.
The widow’s crying at the coffin with two Masonic rings sees to have been added for comedic effect.
“Billionaire Class”… Well that’s a new euphemism. Or did J. Coke mean Buddhists?
In the age of AI and total media manipulation, we can’t really know what happened and what didn’t, what is “real” and what isn’t. All we can know is the narrative that they show.
The narrative is that a former student with a perfect GPA and a good scholarship abandoned everything and decided to shoot a random right-wing activist for no reason whatsoever.
Supposedly he also had a tranny boyfriend, but he came from a conservative family (his father was in law enforcement) and had a good relationship with his parents.
None of it makes any sense whatsoever.
I was thinking that the former student was a patsy and the shooting was done by someone else, but now it is starting to look like a complete hoax, similar to Trump’s “shooting”, only a little better done this time.
The whole thing was probably staged. How do we know it wasn’t? We see this kind of stuff everyday in Hollywood movies. How do we know any image we see on the news, promoted by people who lie all the time, is “real”?
There are a lot of weird things, not just in the official story, but in the videos that are circulating online.
What is the evidence? “The TV said so”?
The whole story is on its face ridiculous.
Kirk was shot by a random leftist. Why? No reason. Just for the LULZ.
The supposed shooter somehow manages to escape with his rifle (where? inside a backpack? that’s all that is seen on the video), but then leaves it in the woods. Why? No reason. Just for the LULZ.
The supposed widow makes cringey videos to the MAGA audience crying in front of what looks like a mannequin and gives weird speeches (I am now thinking Kirk may have been gay and that was a fake marriage. Maybe now he’s in Tel Aviv having fun).
Maybe things really happened this way. After all, life sometimes can be stupid. And, real or fake, that’s the narrative they will push in any case — left vs right, Antifa vs MAGA, and more censorship and more AI-police state stuff. Just as 911 gave us no shoes in airports and Rapiscan. Some people will make money with those things. Most will not.
Honestly, whatever “really” happened is not really all that important — in the age of AI, you can’t even tell anymore. What matters is the narrative. The media is the message, as McLuhan said. The message of current AI-media is: since you can’t tell which video is real and which one isn’t, trust our managed narrative.
Apparently it is not even a corpse but some sort of dummy. Check out Gemma O’Doherty’s Substack.
Anyway, it seems clear to me now that the whole point of this operation was to create exactly this sort of public trauma and trying to get the maximum emotional response from the right/MAGA crowd.
Notice that now they found out, quelle surprise, that the supposed shooter was not just a leftist, but was in a romantic relationship with a transgender furry. So he climbed on a roof to shoot Kirk because… Why? Kirk wasn’t even against transgenders, apparently.
Anglin’s title saying the assassination was a “deepfake” may be a joke, but I no longer believe any of this is real. I don’t think it’s deepfake or CGI, though, probably old-school practical effects.
Bolsonaro didn’t “attempt a coup”, his supporters did the same theatre that was done in the US January 6, or whenever it was. In both cases, all with the police allowing it (because they wanted to later portray it as an “attack on democracy”). Bolsonaro is like Trump in many ways.
By the way, Lula was also in prison for a while, but in his case it was considered “lawfare” or “injustice”. Weird. As far as I know, it is EXACTLY the same issue: an opponent is put in prison so that he cannot run in the elections against the current president.
Typical Latin American stuff, really. I guess at least they advanced a bit, before they used to shoot their rivals, now they only put their rivals in prison.
Shut up, you’re either a Jew or a dumb Hohol. The only Ukrainian “natives” are Khazars. Most older “Ukrainians” I know living abroad who left before the current wave (and the most vocal about fighting this stupid war) are actually Jews. In the Ukrainian government I assume it’s mostly Jews. Just as a lot of “Iranians” in Los Angeles are actually Jews.
That said, there is no difference between Russians and actual Ukrainians (not Khazars), the only difference is that Ukrainians are probably more mixed with Poles and Tatars, and Russians with other peoples depending on which region they are (it is a huge country, of course the further East you go the more Asiatic it becomes).
Who cares! No one gave a FUCK about that supposed country that didn’t even exist until 1991, and there is no reason to give a FUCK now either. And certainly not billions of dollars and weapons.
How does a bullet ricochet on the chest and hit the neck? Especially if on a downwards trajectory, as the shot was up from a roof? It would have gone sideways or downwards.
Or perhaps, this is a cousin of JFK’s “magic bullet”?
But I suppose it could be possible, in any case what I find much harder to believe is that a random leftist student just decided to shoot someone he didn’t even know and in the process ruin his own life and his family’s life because he didn’t like Kirk’s speeches or something.
I don’t know, I suppose some leftists are insane, but, you know, usually they will just do graffiti or vandalism or protest or riot and that will satisfy their violent impulses.
Plus, climbing to a roof (undetected) and escaping and all the planning involved. People are making it as if it was easy, but, I don’t think so.
So, I don’t think that dumb student was the shooter — if there was a shooter at all, and this whole thing wasn’t some sort of kayfabe like in Trump’s “shooting”.
Jeez, You’d Have Thought They Assassinated Bob Hope
That was the whole point of this assassination — real or fake, it doesn’t matter. Like 9/11, what matters is the psychological impact. That’s what they wanted, an apparently friendly, harmless conservative activist killed in plain sight, generating shockwaves and panic all across the political spectrum, but mainly among right-wing young people, and this idea that “they killed (Bob) Hope”.
Of course they will find that the killer is some Antifa-tranny leftist, which will further divide people, and they will roll out some more dystopian totalitarian measures with AI control and so on, and this will be supported by the right, then never be rolled back and used by both “left” and “right”. I mean, the Jews that control both sides.
All this drug-dealing stuff is probably run by the CIA. South American cartels are just small fish.
I’m not sure about the legalization of drugs. I think it has bad social effects. On the other hand, the fake “war on drugs” makes the problem even worse.
Most of the problem of violence in countries like Colombia, Mexico, Brazil and now even Argentina is because drug prohibition allows a bunch of low-intelligence black and brown savages to make insane amounts of money, then buy powerful guns and fight against each other and the police.
Liberating all drugs and letting people die is bad, but this is probably worse.
I never liked any drugs (except alcohol and coffee), and I don’t see much their point, but apparently a lot of people enjoy them, probably for the same reason that they enjoy crappy fast food and bad TV shows.
The CIA plays its part, but "small fish" the cartels are not.
All this drug-dealing stuff is probably run by the CIA. South American cartels are just small fish.
What amazes me is how Indians took over whole industries in the US, especially in IT and related fields. I worked for more than one company where it was all Indian names at the top.
Indians are bad bosses and cheap as hell. They will pay peanuts, but expect a lot. They expect things to be good, quick and cheap, which is impossible.
And they only promote their own.
Maybe if China and India get friendlier, that’s a good thing. Anything that sends Indians back to India is a good deal. Or maybe the Pajeets can go to China instead of to Europe, UK, Canada and the US. There’s a lot of empty streets to poop in the new Chinese ghost cities!!!
p.s. I don’t think it is a religious issue, but a cultural and racial issue, Pakis are as bad as Indians. Different religion, but same people. Although Pakis are probably even lower IQ and don’t rise as high as some Indians do.
When will this goblin and its ridiculous “country” simply disappear from the news? I count the days. I almost miss the Covid era. Time for another psy-ops, Jews, this “war everywhere” is getting tiresome. Maybe the “aliens” one will be funnier? Or an “AI takes control of humans” thing, that could be fun too. Anything but this goblin.
Since you have no idea what might be going on behind the scenes you are merely exposing yourself as a rabidly obsessive character, frothing at the mouth with no analytical skills. Therefore your information value is near zero, so you basically function as a cheerleader for others like yourself in an echo chamber.
"They have no possible way of imposing such a choice upon Russia, and if they attempt to do so, they will be annihilated."
To be fair, due to pressure and assistance from the more advanced and clean Scandinavians, the region eventually got a sewage treatment plant built two years later, in time for the 2018 Russian soccer championships. Here is a link to the story:
Baltic Sea States Aghast At Russian Exclave’s Sewage Dumping
June 04, 2015
“Kaliningrad, in terms of water pipes and sewers, is a completely medieval city that pours its waste into the gutter. Just as they splashed it out the window in medieval cities, we throw it out not far from Kaliningrad, in just the same way,” said Aleksandra Korolyova, a Kaliningrad-based activist with the Russian group Ekozashchita (Environmental Protection). “It’s very clearly visible: It’s just a black torrent that pours out of the pipe directly into the lagoon, and the lagoon is part of the sea.”
https://www.rferl.org/a/kaliningrad-baltic-sea-sewage/27053241.html
Who cares, retard? European countries are doing a good enough job of destroying themselves importing zillions of Africans, Pakis and Arabs and not reproducing enough white people, so in which way being ruled by a “new Russian Empire” would be worse than the current situation? And I’d prefer Putin over Macron or any of the fags and cunts that “rule” Europe right now.
Not a fan of Soviets, but they may have done the Baltic countries and Poland a favour by occupying them, otherwise today those countries would have a number of Blacks and Arabs comparable to France, Italy and Germany (Former DDR Eastern Germany is still the region that hass less migrants, and yet it has already a lot).
You freaking JEW.
An interesting exposé of this Elsztain guy, but, you know, it’s not as if Jews were not present also in the criminal Peronist government of the Kirchners. (In fact, they may have been Jews themselves. )
Remember, Jews always control both sides. Maybe now it’s a Chabad pro-Israeli group versus a progressive secular Jewish movement. I don’t know. But there were lots of Jews in previous governments as well. And of course they are very present in the culture, etc, Argentina has the highest Jewish population in South America (Brazil comes second), and always had. Ever heard of the Zwi Migdal?
By the way, I think Milei may be Jewish too, he has a strange bio, that certainly hides something.
More interesting would be to describe what Milei’s policies are doing, or not doing, in Argentina, and whether the country is going to get better or to experience yet another collapse (they happen every 20-30 years in the country, it’s like clockwork).
But, alas, this article does none of that.
The whole ICE thing is just theatre for the MAGA crowd. So they think something is happening.
Plus, stealing from the taxpayer a few cool billions more.
And remember, Trump has talked about “legal” migration being good.
It’s like Meloni, who said she was against immigration and now made an agreement to bring in half a million “legal” Indians, Pakis and Arabs to Italy to “fight a labour shortage” — all the while young Italians have to go abroad to find work.
What does it matter if they are “legal” or “illegal”? What matters is that they are non-white. If a million “illegal” Swedish blond girls entered the country in boats from Stockholm, no one would complain.
Well, at least, I wouldn’t.
It’s easy to stop and reverse migration, if you want. After the Second World War, we saw the movement of millions of people across borders.
The thing is, the powers that be don’t want to stop it. They just want to pretend they do.
They really want to replace you.
Only the Danish are worse. We have enough prostitutes thank you very much. Now that they have ruined Sweden they will be looking for new places to go.Replies: @Trinity
What does it matter if they are “legal” or “illegal”? What matters is that they are non-white. If a million “illegal” Swedish blond girls entered the country in boats from Stockholm, no one would complain.
Agreed.
What does it matter if they are “legal” or “illegal”? What matters is that they are non-white. If a million “illegal” Swedish blond girls entered the country in boats from Stockholm, no one would complain.
Well, at least, I wouldn’t.
That, in a nutshell, is it.
The thing is, the powers that be don’t want to stop [third-world immigration]. They just want to pretend they do.
Written in the past tense.
With an apparently real but old picture (But background is AI or Photoshop?)
What does it mean?
He’s abandoning writing completely? Well he did it many times recently, but I think a writer can never completely stop writing or having ideas (even if he does not work on them).
Suicide? He doesn’t seem the type, but well, he seemed a bit depressed or hopeless lately, to be honest. Then again, so am I, and I’m not contemplating suicide.
Or perhaps it just means he married an Asian lady and is concentrating in work and family.
Maybe even a Russian lady, that would be awesome. That’s what I would wish for, at any rate.
Anyway: you were/are an inspiration to many, regardless of your failings.
Thanks, Andrew.
I have alcoholism,
I have a prostate problem, a liver problem, and crippling depression. I’m expecting this to solve all of these problems.
Perhaps stopping drinking or reducing it by a lot (i.e. non-Irish levels) could also help?
At least with the liver thing.
Good luck.
My record of fasting is only about 48 hrs.
This year I fasted on Ash Wednesday for 36 h and should fast again for Easter at least 24h.
Longer fasts are tough. Although, to be honest, the hardest are the first hours, afterwards you don’t feel it so much. Hunger somehow goes away after the first pangs.
I might try a three-day fast one day. Eight days seems difficult. But I think Anglin did a five-day fast before. The more you fast, the less hard it gets.
However, they say fasting shouldn’t be done just for health reasons exclusively (vanity) but for spiritual reasons. Who knows. But I think it’s healthy every now and then.
Best.
But the real Laszlo Toth was a Catholic who believed he was Jesus Christ.
That’s what Wiki says, but I don’t trust wiki. It’s more likely he is Jewish. Also, I don’t think it is just a coincidence that the creators of this film chose this name for the character. They say “oh, it’s just a very common surname in Hungary”. Maybe, but why exactly that name and surname? And for a Jewish character, too? Jews tend to have specific surnames, unless they change them to hide.
But it does make sense to give him the name of the guy who tried to destroy the Pietà.
Well, as the Dude says, “that’s just, like, your opinion, man”. And given that you don’t even sign with your own name and I don’t know who you are (you may be Jewish or a Fed, for all I know) I don’t see why I should take it seriously.
But it’s true that both post-Vatican II Catholic Church and Protestants (from much earlier) have big problems. I’m not even sure I’d consider them Christians, except maybe for a few Trad Catholics (Viganò, etc). The Protestants, I don’t know, they always seemed to be a sort of “Left” of the Church and some denominations are really just Jewish cults, but they have been taken over from much before.
But nothing has ended yet.
I don’t usually read Cook’s unimaginative leftist screeds, but in this case he seems to be mostly right. But I just parsed the article.
However, I don’t think it has anything to do with “rare earth minerals”, that’s just the excuse du jour. This war has been first about democracy and sovereignty, then about gay stuff, then about farmable land, now it is said to be about “minerals”…
I think it’s more just that the Ukraine and in particular Crimea are a strategic point for military bases, and US/UK are angry that it was stolen from them. This appears to be Crimean War 2.0, fortunately, they lost this one.
At this point, no one with any brain cells left likes Zelensky, the aggressive panhandler from Kiev, except the even more obnoxious Starmer and Macron and Leyen, all ghouls. Hopefully he will disappear from the news soon, fake his death and retire to Tel Aviv under a new identity.
It's about Full Spectrum Dominance, this has been been official US policy for a long time now. I don't see it get mentioned much, the word hegemony fits but it also conveniently blurs it out. It's part and parcel jewish supremacy too. The US(as a jewish state) needs access to the minerals to maintain this, along with the money, even if it's all secondary to it.Replies: @purrturbed
However, I don’t think it has anything to do with “rare earth minerals”, that’s just the excuse du jour. This war has been first about democracy and sovereignty, then about gay stuff, then about farmable land, now it is said to be about “minerals”…
I am not fan of the current Pope, but your screeds are obnoxious and stupid, as is everything published by “Freud-Jung”.
It is trash on a level of the worst Jewish porn stuff. I have no idea why Unz still publishes such trash, as it doesn’t have any sort of intellectual quality nor shows any good writing. Awful, unreadable stuff, which would need an editor to even be understood. (Anglin also would need an editor sometimes, but at least he occasionally manages to be interesting, funny or insightful)
Your columns and comments remind me of the “Raches” character, who Unz also thought worth of a column, but whom fortunately had the good sense to eventually disappear (he managed to be even worse than Freud-Jung and Revulsky together).
Then again, Unz publishes a lot of trash, now I basically only read Anglin, the comments, and a few occasional articles.
It's Jung-Freud.
. . . as is everything published by “Freud-Jung”.
I have never read any review by Sailer that was actually about the movie he just watched. He only uses his “film reviews” to push the same things he always pushes over and over (affirmative action, black women’s hair, blacks running faster, Harvard selections, SAT scores, baseball, NFL, golf, etc).
Then again, this is a guy who wrote that “Guardians of the Galaxy” was a “great movie”, so I wouldn’t put much trust on his reviews or on his cinematic taste, anyway.