No I was not. Thanks for the reference.

I find the issue of Marcion and Marcionism to be particularly interesting. I hadn’t realized that theorists considered “The Gospel of Marcion” –a text we do not possess, and one that we only know of by way of Irenaeus’s polemics against Marcion, where every other mention of this text by later church leaders appears also to be due to them having read Irenaeus’s commentaries on Marcion– is thought to be the same text as the earlier version of The Gospel Of Luke which had been procured by Marcion (this according to Irenaeus as well). I had thought that Marcion’s copy of Luke and the “Gospel of Marcion” were hypothesized to be two different texts.

At any rate, if the Gospel of Marcion (derogatorily named by Irenaeus) was in fact the earliest copy of the book of Luke, then this strongly suggests that original book of Luke was likely worded in such a way to make the Marcionite belief (that Yahweh was a lesser deity, and not the same deity as Jesus’s father “Abba Father”) much more explicit than what we have now in the NT. Was the Marcionite hypothesis about Yahweh the view of the earliest Christians? Did they believe that Yahweh and Jesus Christ were somehow at odds?

It’s a natural hypothesis because there seem to be so many differences already even in the canonical New Testament that firmly characterize “Our Father in Heaven” as being fundamentally different in almost every conceivable way than Yahweh.

If Marcionism had succeeded then Christianity today would be far less Jewish than it is.

With all due respect for E. Michael Jones, Candace Owens, Nick Fuentes, and like-minded Catholics, they can never turn Christianity into something un-Jewish, unless they convert to Marcionism.

Bingo!

Unfortunately we don’t know a lot about the early Marcionites and what the scriptural justifications for their outlook were. However, I have come across a rather interesting former Assemblies of God preacher by the unfortunate name of Israel Anderson (IA) who has abandoned Christian Theology altogether, yet still considers himself a follower of Jesus, and seems to have rediscovered Marcionism strictly from his own obsessive reading of the OT and NT. He has some very interesting things to say. I highly recommend listening to him if you find this topic interesting and I have posted 3 videos below.

Unfortunately, IA also believes in this ancient alien nonsense but if you subtract this out of his presentation you wind up with the following view, which he tries to prove from scripture:

1) The high god of all of humanity and author of creation was referred to in Hebrew scripture as “Elyon” or “The Most High”. This God, along with Yahweh and Jesus, correspond to Gods in other pantheons and therefore is in no way exclusive to Jews. Elyon holds no special esteem for them compared to other nations.
2) Yahweh is not Elyon, but a lower deity, although he later blasphemed by claiming to be the only God. Moses after helping to kill Aaron (his brother) on Yahweh’s behalf, confesses this to the Hebrews.
3) Yahweh is Satan, or at the least in league with him.
4) Elyon is head of the “Elohim”, or a body of Gods that rule over mankind. Yahweh, a son of Elyon, was permitted to rule over only Israel.
5) Yahweh/Satan engaged in a war on his father in Heaven.
6) Yahweh’s covenant with the jews came in 2 phases: First promise them their independence and their own homeland. Once this had occurred, he promises them that they will rule over all the other nations through debt-enslavement. This was a war on the natural order established by Elyon. Yahweh’s covenant (i.e. contract) with the Hebrews is that he would keep them alive if only they follow his every insane demand. Yahweh kills both Aaron and Moses over the smallest of infractions.
7) Since the Jews entered into this contract with Yahweh voluntarily, the only way to end the divine law was for Yahweh to violate his oath by breaking his own promises.
8) Jesus is also a son of Elyon and was present with him at the time of creation. Therefore strictly speaking, he was not a Jew. He incarnated on Earth as a Jew so that he might fully submit himself to Yahweh’s contract and therefore “fulfill” it without breaking it (“I came to fulfill the law, not destroy it”). In the temptation (testing) of Jesus “The Devil”, either acting as a servant of Yahweh or Yahweh himself, tests whether or not Jesus can follow Torah law to the letter. When Jesus successfully passes all of Yahweh’s Exodus-like tests –something the Hebrews could not do– as a last-ditch effort, Yahweh, through “The Devil”, makes the same offer to Jesus that he offered the Jews: that he will rule over all the kingdoms in the world if only he will follow Yahweh instead of his father in heaven (This offer only makes sense if it is Yahweh who is making the offer). Jesus, unlike the Jews, turns down this offer. Yahweh, through his people the pharisees, execute Jesus anyway thus violating their own law and freeing the Jews and all of mankind. Yahweh broke his own side of the deal and his covenant is forfeit.

Marcion isn’t the last Christian to have noticed these things in the bible. So did Isaac Newton and Michael Servetus (who was burnt at the stake at the behest of John Calvin). Video included below.

The above description really doesn’t do IA’s work justice who is much more thorough with the available evidence including references to Yahweh being Satan in both the OT and NT as well as Jesus’s statements where he intentionally distinguishes his father from Yahweh. Perhaps this presents a way forward for reforming Christianity. One also has to be opened minded to the possibility as well that Paul simply got a number of things wrong whenever he was giving his own unsubstantiated opinions:

https://youtu.be/JIMAqxGPR8Q?si=cYKJnHllcFFeKwZt

https://youtu.be/UoEorNACwmA?si=ZC_0roGbBsuXNSo7

https://youtu.be/7NgSFRLum2U?si=Zavd6UFNURgXAOWu

This has naturally led me to strongly suspect that your massive commenting constitutes your full-time job, and that you’re therefore on the payroll of the ADL or some similar sort of organization.

What, the “Patrick McNally” handle doesn’t convince you that he’s merely a simple Irishman with an entirely coincidental penchant for disproving antisemitic conspiracy theories?

I can’t believe 3 Unz readers didn’t get from the first sentence that this was a joke. You better reply to them and let them know you’re OK. lol

Why are you so convinced Vox Day was behind Q?

My thoughts parallel yours somewhat. “Globalists” have quite a few different interests at play. Zionism and the centrality of US power are 2 of those. Someone above said that Sachs is sympathetic to the goals of the WEF. I wish someone would provide some references to back this claim. If this is true, is it possible Sachs is merely pivoting away from issues relating to US/Zionist hegemony while acquiescing to other globalist narratives?

I know Ron likes to pooh-pooh the topic of “The Great Reset”, ostensibly because it was used by commenters to derail his very carefully considered presentation of the facts surrounding the outbreak of COVID, which definitely point to a possible US bioweapons attack on China. Ron’s theory has completely won out over those who sloppily point to figures like Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates as the culprits behind COVID. As a result, the Bitchute agitators like Alex Jones have been made to look silly.

However, after Biden won the election, John Kerry went around giving talks assuring the globalists that under a Biden administration The Great Reset would progress faster than anyone might imagine. Following the inauguration, a very long list of inexplicable tragedies have fallen upon the American people. A staggering number of food processing plants went up in smoke while the Soros funded prosecutor Letitia James has declared war on one of the US’s largest meat packing companies declaring that they are liable for climate change. Simultaneous to this, Congress has set aside millions of dollars in the new Omnibus spending bill to electronically track cattle. Ranchers are sounding the alarm. Rancher and Congressman Thomas Massie says that this is a trojan horse that will put small ranchers out of business and enable the US federal government to regulate how much cattle can be processed and sold in the US. There is a parallel bill being proposed to do just this. With the existence of a very large and profitable fast food industry, why hasn’t there been any significant institutional push back against this?

In Oregan, small farms are being shut down en mass to “Protect the People”. Satellite technology is being used to identify all small farms and the government is sending cease and desist letters. See here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unOXcKigSuY&t=28s

There is a powerful movement in the US to deprive US citizens of the right to grow their own food. Would anyone in their wildest imaginations in say, 2014, dream that a US state would be doing this? And how is this not front page news all across the nation?

The war in Ukraine and The Middle East are tragedies deserving of the utmost attention and I’m thankful to both Ron and Sachs for lending their brave voices to raise awareness as to who are really behind this. These wars, however, have provided a happy distraction for the tragedies happening right here in the US. “Conspiracy Theorists” seem to be divided into two camps: Those that are preoccupied with commenting on the wars and zionism and those are preoccupied with commenting on the Biden administration’s domestic policies including those related to “climate change” and the WHO pandemic treaty. Is this bifurcation by design? If so, this explains the relative ease by which Sachs has been able to criticize the regime.

I know Ron has characterized Sachs as brave. And he is. Both men are braver than me. However, I would remind Ron of Ezra Pound and the time he spent in a prison camp, psychologically tortured by the FDR administration for his anti-war activity. This is what happens when you’re seen by the regime as of no good use whatsoever and genuinely a threat.

Dividing populism into at least two competing camps is the oldest and most well documented trick in the book. Is the US being led by a zionist conspiracy or a communist/technocratic conspiracy? Or are these just two branches of the same cabal? By the 1960’s the communist arm had lost all credibility and the Zionist one was on the ascendent. They were so trusted they could murder a president, attack a US ship and destroy the twin towers without it occurring to anyone, save Michal Collins Piper. Their hand in our affairs though is now palpable to everyone. You can now watch Israel/Palestine atrocity videos on Twitter that were previously relegated only to Bitchute.

The trend has reversed. The Zionists are on the defensive and the Communists are on the offensive. The legal warfare being waged on zionists like Trump and the zionist friendly Alex Jones, as well as their fellow travelers like Roger Stone and the J6’rs, portend a change in focus for the globalists.

The failures of the US empire are becoming obvious as well. When this happens, one has to cut losses. If I were a globalist, I would be mainly thinking of the survival of my own personal empire. I’d be cutting my losses with the US/Israel, build a private bunker in New Zealand, and use my internationalist connections to ensure the survival of my corporations and wealth. As long as highly visible and respected dissidents like Sachs limit their commenting to the US’s failed foreign policy and do not come into any direct contact with classified documents, they are probably relatively safe from receiving the Ezra Pound / Julian Assange treatment.

Just as the holocaust is the founding myth of Zionism, Climate Change is the current raison d’être of the globalists. Both sacred cows have to be slaughtered.

Subversive how?

Good question and the answer to it puts me squarely in the “Israel did it” camp. One does not undertake to assassinate the president of the USA lightly as you’d be doing it at a great risk to yourself, or the at least the interests you represent, since there’s no guarantee of success or avoiding detection.

Therefore those who did, did so because they could not wait. For them it would have to be a do or die situation. This was precisely how the Israelis saw their nuclear program. David Ben-Gurion saw the acquisition of nukes as a “holy mission” and was at the forefront of his efforts to provide a future for Israel. Without nukes, Israel might’ve remained a second-rate middle eastern nation. The nuclear option meant more to Israel than just self defense. It was also intended as a means to blackmail the USA which they did for decades.

In Michael Collins Piper’s book, “Final Judgement”, he mentions JFK had agreed to provide defensive missiles (I believe they were Hawk Missiles) in response to Ben-Gurion’s plea that Israel could only defend itself if it had nuclear capability. JFK compromised by giving them the Hawk Missiles to keep their nuclear weapons program at bay.

In Final Judgement, MCP quotes a high level CIA asset stationed in Israel, if I remember correctly (I do not remember the name of the individual but I could probably find it), commented on JFK’s negotiations with Israel after his death (I’m paraphrasing from memory), “Giving them the Hawk Missiles was JFK’s biggest mistake because the Israelis soon realized ‘if the USA will give us missiles for us to not make a nuke, how much more would they give us not to use a nuke that we have’”

In the year leading up to his death JFK and RFK were threatening Ben-Gurion. The head of the IDF stated (paraphrasing) “if we don’t complete our program to obtain a nuke, JFK/RFK could force their way into Dimona at any time and it would be over…”

Indeed, if JFK had ordered the facility to be raided unexpectedly, he would’ve provided proof to the world that the program existed. By law, UN weapons inspectors would’ve been forced to inspect any and all of Israel’s nuclear facilities to ensure that no weapons grade nuclear manufacturing was occurring. This would mean a death sentence for the program. Ben-Gurion even gave a speech threatening that Israel would kill anyone standing in the way of them acquiring the nuclear bomb.

Israel’s need was quite unlike anything at the CIA. For them, it was “now or never/do or die”. They couldn’t wait until another election. Kennedy would’ve certainly made a move before the end of his term. On the other hand, the people pushing the CIA theory can’t explain why the situation was “do or die” for them. The CIA tried for years and years after Kennedy to assassinate Fidel Castro without success, and that’s without Kennedy in the picture. If they killed Kennedy due to Cuba, but then failed to actually have their assassination (or war), consider what a huge screw up this would be! They have forever brought all of this suspicion upon themselves and have nothing whatsoever to show for it.

The Israelis, by contrast, racked up a huge list of trophies thanks to the murder. Our middle east foreign policy did a 180 degree turn the day Johnson was sworn in. The USA immediately began to increase aid to Israel, our relations with the Arabs were strained. A nuclear tech/military tech theft operation got under way (see the Apollo Affair) where the Israelis have stolen nuclear secrets from the US with impunity for decades (I’ll post Ryan Dawson’s extensive documentary on this below). No politician since JFK/RFK have ever tried to register any Israeli lobby organizations under FARA again. They brag openly that they control our Congress, and they do. Both sides (R and D).

You could literally write a full length book entitled “How the Israelis Were Able to Write Their Own Ticket To US Power By Murdering JFK!”

None of this would have happened without the timely murder of JKF. Can anyone list a similar set of accomplishments for the CIA?

Here is Dawson’s excellent documentary. I highly recommend it. So many of the JFK researchers love to say of the assassination that “It was a coup!” But never convincingly answer the question “A coup? A coup by who?” When you learn of the extensive web of Israeli spies and mafiosos that have been threatening politicians and robbing us blind this whole time (Epstein is the tip of the iceberg), surely you can see that we have the most convincing answer to the question of who successfully pulled of the biggest coup in US history. It wasn’t the CIA:

https://twitter.com/RyLiberty/status/1712100765555425560?s=20

Regarding those cell towers being knocked out, here’s what I said under Ron’s most recent piece:

This is the explanation given to the western press by the Israeli government and no one should believe this. It’s patently absurd. When you design a system with sophisticated underground censors and unmanned machine guns, designing a way for a distant command center to be instantly alerted during a catastrophic failure is trivial by comparison. After all, if an underground censor stopped working, how would anyone know to go and repair it? Real time DSP has to be performed on the signal in order to filter “signal” from “noise” and if that raw signal is no longer transmitted to headquarters they’d know to dispatch a team to repair the malfunctioning equipment. If a single tower went offline, this would be a high severity threat and surely would get escalated automatically resulting in a helicopter flyover followed by an IDF squad to secure the area while the tower was fixed. Multiple of these towers each responsible for broadcasting the signals of dozens of pieces of equipment back for signal analysis all being taken out simultaneously would be catastrophic –indicative of a full scale invasion– and this event’s escalation would be handled by a fully automated process in addition to command center staff following up as well. Indeed the head of the IDF would probably be paged immediately by an automated computer system.

I’m not saying Ron and Kevin’s analysis overall isn’t good. I just don’t know what to make of it yet. Much of it depends upon both of them accepting Israel’s explanation that they a) were completely made blind by those drones and b) they have no way to know whether or not they are currently “blind”.

Becoming blind is in and of itself a clue that something catastrophic is taking place.

https://twitter.com/jakeshieldsajj/status/1718871263937220749?s=20

Thanks for giving me the Japanese version of that. I was sitting here wondering how they’d say it.

Israel had invested hundreds of millions of dollars in advanced technology to guard its Gaza border, but Hamas disabled those systems using inexpensive small drones and highly innovative tactics

This is the explanation given to the western press by the Israeli government and no one should believe this. It’s patently absurd. When you design a system with sophisticated underground censors and unmanned machine guns, designing a way for a distant command center to be instantly alerted during a catastrophic failure is trivial by comparison. After all, if an underground censor stopped working, how would anyone know to go and repair it? Real time DSP has to be performed on the signal in order to filter “signal” from “noise” and if that raw signal is no longer transmitted to headquarters they’d know to dispatch a team to repair the malfunctioning equipment. If a single tower went offline, this would be a high severity threat and surely would get escalated automatically resulting in a helicopter flyover followed by an IDF squad to secure the area while the tower was fixed. Multiple of these towers each responsible for broadcasting the signals of dozens of pieces of equipment back for signal analysis all being taken out simultaneously would be catastrophic –indicative of a full scale invasion– and this event’s escalation would be handled by a fully automated process in addition to command center staff following up as well. Indeed the head of the IDF would probably be paged immediately by an automated computer system.

I got my start working in a command center for a company that had similar systems. You could unplug a server completely cutting off its power source and we’d know in within the polling interval of the monitoring software. I’ve designed similar and very simple software for instant notifications for a hospital. It’s all pretty trivial.

It’s impossible for me to think the IDF didn’t know that they had lost all visibility at that fence. Surely US prisons are run better than this.

Speaking of Brother Nathanael, does anyone know what’s happened to him? He’s been removed from Bitchute. His website was gone too the last I checked.

I guess Ron had his own knee jerk reaction that everyone else crying “false flag!” are having knee jerk reactions. Given how many American Pravda pieces he’s written about all manner of Israeli/US false flags, I would have thought he might have at least moderated his assessment like “let’s be careful in calling this another false flag until more information comes to light.”

Kevin Barrett’s analysis is going to age very badly as well.

First, Hamas is a real, highly competent military organization enjoying the passive support of virtually everyone in the MENA region, and the active support of many governments. (It’s open in the case of Iran, and deniable in other instances.) Hamas is entirely capable of pulling off a shocking military success like the October 7 operation.

But Haaretz has quoted Netanyahu as recently as 2019 saying to the Likud that they support Hamas financially. Would they be willing to do this without dozens of informants and backup informants?

Barrett goes on to infer from his understanding of geopolitics that a false flag would not be in Israel’s interests and then reasons backwards to the conclusion that no false flag occurred:

Second, Hamas’s big October 7 victory does not help Israel strategically, as 9/11 did. In recent years, Israel’s strength has been its phony normalization campaign and its ability to conceal its ever-growing extremism and accelerating genocide of Palestine. That’s all toast now

First it remains to be seen if it’s toast. Secondly if they were so worried about their normalization campaign, why haven’t they reacted to the incursion in stride with an effort to minimize losses while quickly returning to the status quo? They’re clearly saying “screw the optics, we’re going in” and they will now level Gaza. With the US’s veto rights at the UN, the global opposition might be toothless. Of course the Iranians, Russians and Chinese could also say “screw the optics, we’re going in”. However, this also remains to be seen.

If in the end this all blows up in the US and Israel’s faces, it just goes to show that these guys were not so omniscient in their understanding of how things would play out on the world stage if they allowed a false flag to happen and followed it up with mass ethnic cleansing. Look at how stupid they’ve been with Ukraine. It’s much easier to believe in this sort screw up than to believe the IDF screwed up the border with all those years of rehearsing this exact type of scenario. In fact there was a long string of basic screw ups, each equally difficult to believe, followed by 7 hour free rein for Hamas to kill innocents before the government took action. People are going to be able to write full length books on the extraordinary, seemingly coordinated screw ups the Israeli’s would’ve had to have made for this to happen in the unimpeded manner that it did.

Israeli attempts to explain away the failure are just as bad too. US media played some report from Israel explaining that their border fence is technologically so advanced that over the years they decided that they just didn’t need so many IDF personnel deployed there. And those motion censors and machine guns that can fire without a gunner to operate them? Well, according to the Israelis in order for that to work at all there are these relay towers that must communicate back to headquarters all that data or the whole system just fails. LOL. All Hamas had to do was destroy those towers and Israel would be defenseless. All those billions of dollars spent on the Iron Dome and they didn’t think to have their border equipment simply ping back to headquarters every 3 seconds with series of alerts if a ping is not received in 5 seconds, 10 seconds, 20 seconds, increasingly escalating the severity until human intervention is required?

I just looked at Barrett’s piece again and did ctrl-f for “Egypt” and couldn’t find a single reference to Egypt’s advanced warning to Israel of the impending attack. And this was just the first of a string of whistleblowers who are coming forward with information supportive of a false flag. Honestly I don’t know how the author of False Flag Weekly News could’ve written this piece.

What’s the point of this website and Kevin Barrett’s extensive effort to educate its readership about the reality and ubiquity of false flags (not to mention countless other deceptions) only to scoff at the readership for worrying whether the current conflagration was due to a false flag? If a false flag is only suspected to have occurred here, getting the word out and demanding investigations might prevent WWIII, but, no, according to Ron we’re “idiots” for thinking of it that way. And according to Barrett, we should be giving Hamas more credit.

Chomsky’s position is exactly the same as Hudson’s. You “partially agree” with Hudson, therefore you partially agree with Chomsky.

This is asinine. Michael Hudson isn’t intentionally diverting anyone’s attention away from Israel’s crimes because he slept with an underage girl on Epstein’s plain. He and Kevin clearly see that the US is capable of committing crimes separate from those involving Zionism.

What Chomsky has done is a different matter entirely.

So, a sniper who hides in the bush waiting to take advantageous shots is controlled opposition because he avoids taking shots that would expose him to deadly return fire?

Tucker’s comments exposing the ADL’s inconsistency was a perfect shot at the correct target but done so in a way that made it harder for them to return fire. Brilliant.

This is precisely the kind of strategizing that has to be done. Sean Hannity is controlled opposition, sure. Tucker’s opposition is legitimate, however leaders need a base of power to accomplish anything. When Tucker demurs, this is evidence of our weakened power rather than evidence of him being controlled op.

However painful, that should be survivable by itself, so long as the US government and Federal Reserve take the blow with equanimity, knowing it is their own actions coming home to roost.

Assuming they humbled themselves (which they won’t), shouldn’t the game plan be to repatriate as much manufacturing as possible to give the dollar some value again (or at least provide it’s downward trajectory with a reasonable floor?)

They want to go to CBDC’s but that won’t help the situation at all.

I basically agree with this assessment, although of course there’s plenty of room for doubt. None of us our insiders, after all.

However, those who site Trump’s kissing Israel’s butt as proof that he’s against us were never too convincing. If the attempted assassination of president Truman by the Israelis, and it’s coverup, the JFK assassination, it’s coverup, the attack on the US Liberty by the Israelis, its coverup, the Apollo Affair –the theft of fully enriched uranium from Zionist, Zalman Shapiro-run NUMEC facility by the Israelis, and its coverup, the eventual assassination plot of GW Bush by the Israelis, and it’s coverup up, are all known by New York insiders, what exactly did Trump’s anti-zionist supporters expect him to do, walk up to the podium and denounce Israel?

Remember, JFK insiders at the time of his election reported that when JFK was facing financing difficulties, some New York based jews met with him in private and offered to finance his campaign in full on condition that he give full control over his Middle East policy to them. JFK told them to go F themselves.

Trump isn’t a self proclaimed messiah. Nor is he Adolf Hitler. He’s a self proclaimed negotiator. And he ran his presidency exactly how you’d expect a negotiator to do. He recognized the existing power structure of the US which is solidly Jewish and made his proposal: As president I’ll support Israel’s interests in the Middle East in full. However, here at home, our government is going to pursue an America First agenda which will probably include bring troops home. This put him into conflict with both the Pentagon and Israeli insiders like Netanyahu who wanted US troops to stay put or increase.

Once you accept that Trump is just a negotiator, then his presidency makes total sense including how the global Jewish community became divided over him. Israel’s population loved him while American finance-Jews mostly hated him (there are a few exceptions). I’m sure this put Bibi Netanyahu in a difficult bind as he needs both domestic support and New York jewish support. So he remained friendly with Trump publicly while working to undermine him in private. As soon as Trump “lost” his re-election, Bibi threw him under a bus and Trump denounced Bibi for it.

I don’t believe Trump is involved in a conspiracy against the US, certainly not knowingly anyway.

Ibanez makes better guitars

I beg to differ:

Thanks for the reference. That was a very interesting piece.

The second guy from the left is Andrew Anglin.

Crypto proponents see promise in Bitcoin; but as Alastair MacLeod observes, Bitcoin’s price is too volatile for it to serve as a national or global reserve currency, and it does not have the status of enforceable legal tender.

I feel that there’s way too much focus on Bitcoin which has severe technical limitations. Please look into Epic Cash and the Epicenter ecosystem as a possible alternative to Bitcoin:

https://epic.tech

EPIC is way more ambitious than Bitcoin and probably 99% of other crypto currencies out there. Their “ecosystem” includes the following 3 components:

EPIC: Confidential, censorship resistant store of value
ECR: Algorithmic Central Bank
EUSD: Soft-pegged Cryptodollar

From their white paper:

Epic Cash is the final point in the journey toward true P2P internet cash, the cornerstone of a private financial system. The Epic currency aims to become the world’s most effective privacy-protecting form of digital money. In order to fulfill that goal, it satisfies the three principal functions of money:
1. Store of Value – can be saved, retrieved, and exchanged at a later time, and of predictable value when retrieved;
2. Medium of Exchange – anything accepted as representing a standard of value and exchangeable for goods or services;
3. Unit of Account – the unit by which the value of a thing is accounted for and compared.

So far Bitcoin only satisfies the need for a store of value. They say Epic Cash and the ecosystem they are working on can meet all 3 requirements.

Also check out their “Epicenter” site: https://epicenter.epic.tech/what-is-epicenter/

The Epicenter ecosystem provides the solid monetary platform that decentralized finance requires. Within this framework, anyone, anywhere, can create secure, scalable, globally accessible financial services in minutes. Epicenter dramatically lowers the barriers to entry, for both producers and consumers of such apps.
“Composability” is a relatively recent buzzword that is taking center stage, and for good reason. When components are modular and reusable, free of the friction of sign-up processes and the need to maintain an ongoing connection between parties, innovators are able to experiment in novel ways to solve client needs at low risk.
There are 1.7 billion people around the world who have smartphones and yet lack access to basic financial services. All of these individuals can benefit immediately from the DeFi apps that are able to make use of the Epicenter ecosystem.
Security, scalability and decentralization — it is no longer necessary to settle for only two. By weaving the strengths of multiple independent blockchains together into one robust fabric, the Epicenter triumvirate of EPIC/ECR/EUSD confidential, composable, interoperable digital assets is moving the world’s financial interactions on chain without compromising on custody, centralization, censorship, permissionlessness or trustlessness.

I’ve been very skeptical about crypto but the threat of CBDC’s being thrust upon us has made me reconsider. But we need something better than Bitcoin. I don’t know why everyone keeps focusing on it.

You need to understand that Christianity was the foot in the door and paved the way for all their communist bullshit.

I disagree. The ultimate foot in the door for Jews is that, unlike the Chinese, they largely look like us and blend in. When I went to college I had an obnoxious Jewish-atheist philosophy professor who actually told our class proudly that he showed pornographic pictures to both of his kids (both younger than 12 years old. I knew this because he brought his daughter into class on “Take your daughter to work day” and his son was even younger) as a form of sex education. He even gesticulated to help illustrate the act of a woman manually stimulating the man’s penis during foreplay that was depicted amongst the pictures. All of this, he explained, he had shown because “it’s better that my kids learn that from me than on their own.” Then he proceeded to talk down to us as if we were some kind of backwards hicks due to the visible shock on our faces as he told us these things. I recall a pretty girl who objected, saying “But we want our kids to remain innocent.” I’ll never forget his sharp response “The innocent get screwed!”

However, due to my general lack of familiarity with Jews and Jewish culture it was only years later that I even realized he was Jewish. It was deeply fascinating for me when I first discovered E Michael Jones and Kevin McDonald and learned that there might actually be a connection between his behavior and his ethnicity (I had come to learn he was Jewish by other means, however).

Look, everyone wants to blame Christianity for this as in “if only we weren’t Christians this wouldn’t have happened.” While there is certainly some spiritual attack vectors Christianity left open, hindsight is 20/20. *Any* system would’ve had attack vectors made apparent to a hostile 3rd party living amongst you, studying your system’s quirks over the course of centuries. Building and sustaining society is much harder than subverting it (entropy always works against creation).

Some hypothetical pagan system that Laurent Guyenot wrote about would’ve eventually required that Jews convert to their system which they would’ve done and then the whole process of embedding their 5th columns everywhere might’ve proceeded just the same as it did under Christianity.

There’s no sweeping away the West’s spiritual past without leaving us even more devastated. Christianity is in our DNA and it must evolve and adapt if it wants to survive. The same would’ve been true of some hypothetical Pagan system.

The problem, of course, is that the compelling “motive” does NOT map to evidence at Deally Plaz

a. Actually, I’m not so sure about that. What wasn’t mention in this essay was PERMINDEX and it’s connections to both a failed attempt on Charles De Gaul’s life and later on their involvement in the Kennedy assassination. Clay Shaw, directory of PERMINDEX and former OSS operative was overheard discussing the assassination prior to the hit. Shaw was put on trial for conspiracy to murder JFK by Jim Garrison and was only acquitted because the judge wouldn’t allow is alias “Bernard Shaw”, if memory serves, to be entered in as evidence for the jury to hear. Shaw had been asked when he was arrested if he had gone by that alias and he answered in the affirmative. His alias was how eye witnesses had identified him. According to jurors had they known this they would’ve come back with a conviction.

PERMINDEX was a front company for Mossad. See the following article:

https://americanfreepress.net/rothschild-link-to-jfk/

Serious question. Is East Palestine really pronounced “Palestein” the way everyone keeps saying it on TV or is it supposed to be pronounced the way we pronounce the Palestine?

This reminds me of when after Obama became president everyone started pronouncing “Osama” as “Usama”.

His social and financial accounts being intact while he is blowing the whistle on establishment. And the circus of being cut off from broadcasts in the middle of his statement. Pure circus to elevate the whistleblower. Who is pushing for his appearances in the mainstream media while genuine whistleblowers doing time in jails.

Yes this is very hard for me to understand. You have comedians like Owen Benjamin or Ye getting blocked from Air Bnb and from banking institutions for pissing off the wrong Jews. Remember what happened to the Rolling Stones journalist Michael Hastings who had spilled the beans on some US generals (was it Petraeus?) but then had his car remote hijacked leading to his violent death just before releasing another such story? Then there’s Julian Assange.

But Sy Hersh and Sachs are able to blow the whistle on the US committing the greatest crimes in the history of the world and actions taken by the establishment to silence them actually accelerate the spread of their message and heighten their sense of credibility. I cannot explain it. I cannot prove anything but after reading the critiques of Hersh by Mike Whitney and now by Tablet magazine:

https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/sy-hersh-swings-big-misses-lee-smith

I can’t help but to get the feeling that the US is getting played. These thoughts also remind me of the reporting that Clayton Morris did on Redacted, according to which a UN insider told them that the millions coming across the US boarder illegally are an attempt by UN types to create the necessary political conditions for a merger between Canada, the USA and Mexico not unlike the European Union, with a loss of US sovereignty.

James Comey and Obama were both communists at one point. At the very least they were subversives. So is the Washington FBI field office. There’s plenty of evidence for the latter. Remember when Obama said “Never underestimate Biden’s ability to fuck shit up?”. Some wit over on Gab commented that Obama wasn’t giving a warning. He was making a guarantee.

Sometimes I get the feeling the US is being sabotaged from within using 5th generational warfare strategy. But that’s a conspiracy theory I can’t prove.

I’ve always felt something was very “off” about this whole plot and that this was some kind of disinformation job but couldn’t quite put my finger on it. The fact that these documents just showed up in the library of congress years later with no one really alive to attest to any of it actually happening except for brief appearances in the papers. Thanks for this reference.

Unz is reduced to being a shill, assuming he hasn’t been a shill all along.

Thanks for the excellent piece. One thing I’ve pondered is why the current messaging about needing a “great reset” from our deep state –the very same people who have pushed for war with Russia– at a time they want us to fight other nations?

This messaging is in stark contrast with what was done in the lead up to 911. For example, there was that grammy award winning Cuba Gooding Jr Pearl Harbor movie (“Short of a new Pearl Harbor, or other catalyzing event, we won’t be able to achieve our objectives in the middle east”). And then certainly in the lead up to the war in Iraq Hollywood admitted to producing patriotic movies that were intended to stoke American pride and sentiment about our military. Smart move if you ask me.

Now, all the messaging we get seems designed to demoralize us: no more red meat! Eat ‘ze bugs! Take the vaxx! Even the military was forced to take the vaccine. Bret Weinstein did some excellent interviews with military pilots who refused the vaccine and was able to show that the mandates certainly affected military readiness. Ace fighter pilots are rare and extremely expensive to train. The last thing you want in the lead up to war is forcefully retire them and yet that’s what the US military did. Weinstein has even gone so far as to hypothesize that this is exactly what an enemy (i.e. China) might do through a compromised executive (Biden) to defeat us without firing a weapon. I think this thesis is obviously wrong and is contradicted by the fact that we are still beating the war drums.

Nothing makes sense. Whose in charge exactly? Perhaps it’s all just incompetent, weak leadership unable to stand up to the various interests making demands of the US.

In all probability he was lied to about it. There are a few highly intelligent, well meaning people who were wrong about it and it’s very hard for them to admit it.

– Ron Unz: While he maintains that the death stats from the CDC and other governments definitively prove that deaths from the vaccines are over exaggerated, he has admitted they could be dangerous in other ways, such as injuries that don’t result in death, and other possible long term consequences. His general tone on the issue has softened a bit. Yet he took the vaccine himself on the basis that “96% of AMA MD’s said it was safe”. It was obvious to me from the beginning that 96% of AMA doctors didn’t have access to any more hard data about the safety/efficacy of these biologics than we did and so their opinions didn’t matter to me.

– Scott Adams: He has given the anti-vaxxer portion of his audience the backhanded compliment that while yes, they were completely right not to take the vaccine, they were only right apparently be sheer dumb luck or purely out of a mistrust for the government which happened to turn out to be the correct assumption this time. The difficulty of admitting that he was wrong is palpable. His anti-vcxx audience actually had scientific reasons to avoid it that he simply chose to ignore and not look into.

Donald Trump is probably no different. He’s still reeling from having the 2020 election stolen from him. And it definitely was. One of the tricks they pulled was to withhold the EUA approvals until after the election was over. He’s still caught up in defending his narrative that it was his accomplishment. It reminds me of my brother, who is a pharmacy manager, who is too caught up in his day to day duties to read or learn anything about the COVID vaccine controversy, preferring instead to rely upon the “usual channels” for information about the safety of drugs. Donald Trump is probably just doing the same thing. Neither person is evil just highly misinformed and/or in denial. Getting people whose sense of accomplishment in life is tied up in a false narrative to reconsider the narrative is really hard to do. I guess it’s human nature.

Like the Upton Sinclair quote at the beginning of this article states:

“It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon him not understanding.”

I find that the more conscientious and motivated a person is, the harder it is for them to reconsider the underlying assumptions of their habits when those habits normally serve them so well.

The RAND Corporation

RANDALL TEX COBB

The Russkies are the Randall Tex Cobb of Eurasia; the Russkies can take a punch and deliver plenty of their own.

Taco Von Ribbentrop thinks the American Empire goons who cooked up this Ukraine proxy war against the Russkies really don’t much care for the Middle American Radical(MAR) European Christian ancestral core of the USA.

https://twitter.com/emeriticus/status/1620118146056323073?s=20&t=vDsKmSfZxzUS6Fmbl9mQug

https://twitter.com/emeriticus/status/1620118691026460674?s=20&t=vDsKmSfZxzUS6Fmbl9mQug

I was about to ask a similar question. You said:

Sure, nobody disputes that the poliovirus actually exists, and it was used to produce the polio vaccines. However, the argument made is that the poliovirus had no connection with the polio illness.

This part of the thesis you present is unclear to me. I thought I understood the thesis to be saying that the paralysis symptoms of polio are probably not being caused by a virus. However, the virus itself causes flu like symptoms with fewer than 1% of people becoming paralyzed probably due to something else they’ve come into contact with before, during or after having caught polio:

The authors begin by briefly summarizing the standard history of polio, explaining that the disease is caused by a viral infection that can produce a flu-like illness, but which in less than 1% of the cases may also damage the nerve cells thereby creating long-term paralysis.

The flu like symptoms weren’t really discussed again in your essay beyond this point. So I’d assumed that with less than 1% becoming paralyzed it’s entirely possible that this small percentage people who contracted a polio infection and coming down with a flu were also injured by some industrial pesticide by sheer coincidence.

After having read his big whopper of a tale from the opening one of your previous essays (without a citation even from previous conspiracy theories on the subject let alone a legitimate historical source) I find myself asking why I should read this current piece:

First, the City of London, a small area of about one square mile in size, was established as a haven by the Khazar “Jews” during their extermination from Khazaria nearly 1,000 years ago, and was named ‘London’ at the time. And yes, I know the Romans had been there first. The city of London, with the Bridge and Harrods, and the fish and chips and the people driving on the wrong side of the road, was established much later, adopted the same name, and gradually expanded with population until it completely surrounded the Jewish enclave of the City of London.

In the sea of citations you do provide occasionally one leads to verifiable information. And seeing as how this essay appears to be much shorter than usual, I might read this later.

John Wilkes Booth was also Jewish:

Also, it was reported that John Wilkes Booth had deep ties with the banking cartel in the City of London:

Lincoln was murdered in 1865, on April 4th, by an actor, John Wilkes Booth, in whose trunk was found coded messages the key to which was found in Judah F. Benjamin’s possession. Benjamin escaped to England where he later died.

https://saxonmessenger.christogenea.org/article/lincoln-and-rothschilds

Judah Benjamin, a slaveowner and senator from Louisiana and first adviser to Jefferson Davis, the President of the Southern Confederacy, had been called “the brains of the Confederacy.” He is widely considered to be a key Rothschild envoy to the US from Britain, where he went back after the Civil War.

The nature of John Wilkes Booth acting as Rothschild agent is reported in Chinese best-seller book “Currency Wars”. The book demonstrates how several American presidents were overtly or covertly executed for opposing the creation of the Federal Reserve.

Also, it is possible that Booth was never killed, but was instead provided a new identity allowing him to peacefully live for another four decades.

There has been a long controversy about having his DNA tested.
Photo identification software, which are not as precise as DNA, but good enough for police and identification records, concluded that a picture of a George St Helen, who died in 1902, proved to be a perfect match for Booth facial features.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6968307/John-Wilkes-Booth-got-away-killing-Abraham-Lincoln-evading-capture-living-aliases.html

I always wondered how Zaprauder was able to hold his hands still, and continue filming after he saw a man’s head get blown off. And I always wondered why when the authorities (or someone else) was confiscating everyone’s photographs at the site of the grassy knoll, (some never to be returned), why they never took Zaprauder’s film while he was still there on the grassy knoll.

All great points. I’ve wondered these same things. I would add to that the shooter on the grassy knoll wouldn’t have been probably more than 30 feet away from Zapruder. I’m a hunter and used to to guns going off but even I startle when I hear one go off unexpectedly. Now, pretend that someone is a) innocently, but excitedly, filming the president of the US as his motorcade drives by your offices. This alone might excite your adrenaline production a bit. b) Then suddenly, and unexpectedly, you see the president get shot from behind. This alone would illicit a reaction in most people that would be visible in the footage he took. But no, Zapruder has nerves of steal. He keeps the camera on target. The suddenly and unexpectedly a rifle blast goes off just feet from you and the president’s brains spatter up into the wind and yet there’s not the slight evidence of a startle reflex from Zapruder. The sound of the blast alone should’ve caused him to flinch at least a little.

I’d submit to you that this was impossible unless Zapruder had actually accompanied the shooter to film it, or at the very least had been told to position himself near the shooter and to be ready for it.

Years ago on the Michael Collins Piper show he discussed all of this with a guest. They mentioned that Jack Ruby, when he shot Oswald, had been telling everyone that he was working as a translator for the Israeli journalists who were also present in number. These journalists must’ve been Mossad agents and the same agents were likely all over the ground in Dealy Plaza. I believe this is probably who the “Babushka Lady” was. She was positioned on the opposite side of the road from Zapruda filming the assassination. I believe they were both part of the same Israeli team filming so that the perpetrators had eyes on the ground from all angles. This is probably why she’s never been identified and why her footage has never been recovered.

What do you want to bet that if she had been apprehended and interviewed, that she would’ve spoke with a thick accent and claimed simply that she was with the Israeli press.

John Wilkes Booth was also Jewish:

I just happened to come across a very interesting bit of information on Facebook. I was doing some research on the Booth’s living relatives, when I came across a page on Facebook under “Booth Family History”. I started reading all of the family’s posts and then I read something I couldn’t believe. I’m sorry I don’t know how to upload this info from Facebook, but this is what one of the ” Booth” family members said_

“Many people ask if we are related to John Wilkes Booth. We are not. The reason we are not is that he is not actually a Booth. He comes from a long line of Spanish Jews in England that were Shakespearian actors. Their last name was BOTHA. Back in those days, Booth was a name of nobility so they changed their last name to boost their popularity.”

https://rogerjnorton.com/LincolnDiscussionSymposium/thread-1869.html

Also:

Wilkes Booth,assassin of Lincoln, was half Jewish.
In the book, John Wilkes Booth – A Sister’s Memoir by Asia Booth, it is revealed that John Wilkes Booth’s father, Junius Brutus Booth, was Jewish.
The passage reads: “Born in 1796 to a highly educated clan of Jewish lawyers and silversmiths on his father’s side”

I’ll note that just a few years ago this information was easy to find with Google. Now, instead of the his sister’s testimony coming up in the first few search results, all the results seem to be allegedly scholarly refutations of the claim of Booth’s Jewish ancestry.

I’m sure it’s possible to reconcile the claim of his ancestors being either actors or lawyers as both things can be true at the same time.

I’d be a little less cavalier in calling Ron a liar based on this. Read the text found below the graph. This is an excerpt:

Because of the unexpected and varying mortality experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic, the calculated baseline applied in the EuroMOMO estimation of excess number of deaths do not include data from 2020 and onwards, as these data will distort the estimated level of baseline number of deaths.

Due to the exclusion of data from the COVID-19 pandemic, the trend incorporated in the statistical estimation of the baseline are presently forecasted beyond the intended duration. This prolonged forecast has introduced an increasing bias over time, which can cause incorrect estimations of the excess mortality, particularly when the numbers are cumulated.

Because of this enhanced bias when cumulating data, the cumulated outputs should not be considered reliable at this point and must be interpreted very cautiously. An example is number of deaths in the age group 0-14 years, where the EuroMOMO countries in the years preceding the COVID-19 pandemic experienced a decrease in mortality. The model extends this declining baseline mortality in a linear fashion.

In other words this is showing an increase over a hypothetical baseline extrapolated from previous years that they are unsure about.

Agreed. I cut and pasted this from the Revolver article above:

So for those who haven’t rigorously tracked every twist in the Santos story, the newly-elected Congressman:

Lied about having an elite finance job when he actually worked at Dish Network.

Lied about his mother having a finance career when she was actually just a cook and housecleaner who spoke no English.

Claimed that his grandparents were Jews who fled the Holocaust, when they were actually born in Brazil.

Claimed to have started an animal welfare group that was never incorporated and may have held fraudulent fundraisers.

Lied about four of his employees dying in the Pulse nightclub shooting, when there is no evidence that ever happened.

Presented himself as a proudly out gay man without mentioning a recent ex-wife.

May have stolen a boyfriend’s phone to pawn it for cash.

Said he was a well-off property owner with many delinquent renters when in fact he owns no property and has been evicted three times.

May face up to five years in prison if he ever returns to Brazil.
Is a fake volleyball star.

This guy has zero ethics and will one day surpass McCarthy and rival Biden for his improprieties against the republic.

I believe this story and have one of my own.

A doctor in my home town was performing a surgery while he was feeling a little under the weather. While standing over the patients with his hands in an open wound, he accidentally coughed and a little spittle went into the open wound.

He turned to the nurses and said, “It’s ok. I’ve been vaccinated.”

When any type of medication is deemed controversial for any reason I do not trust the opinions of Doctors especially when they were pushing it. I know a drug rep and he says doctors often push the drugs they’re encouraged to push.

Of course after several years of experience with a range of drugs for say high blood pressure, their experience at that point becomes invaluable when they recommend drug A over B. But these vaccinations were by legal definition “experimental” and brand new. The 96% of AMA physicians didn’t have any basis whatsoever for weighing out taking these vaccines versus not taking them and for which people (old versus young, for example).

You’re misunderstanding the study. The study showed that 82% of 1st or 2nd trimester pregnancies were terminated after the administration of the COVID vaccine. The purpose of the study was to administer a vaccine then observe the effects on the pregnancy after 20 weeks, thus the calculation should not include 3rd trimester vaccine administrations.

82% , or 104 out of 127 1st/2nd trimester vaccinations resulted in spontaneous abortion during the 20 weeks. So, the study authors inexplicably included 700 additional pregnancies with 3rd trimester vaccinations into their denominator bringing the percentage from 82% down to 12% (104 / 827) which is inline with normal miscarriage rates:

Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred before their pregnancies hit the 20-week mark. These are indicated as “spontaneous abortions” in the table.

In simple math, 104 spontaneous abortions (during the first 20 weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their first or second trimesters calculates to an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions among these pregnant women who were vaccinated.

It is important to note that deaths of unborn babies during the third trimester are known as “stillbirths” and not spontaneous abortions. Thus, the spontaneous abortions could not have possibly occurred in women vaccinated during their third trimester, by definition.

Thus, the study authors dishonestly used the wrong denominator of 827 in their “spontaneous abortions” calculation, when they should have used a denominator of 127, which is the number of women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters.

Put another way, it is impossible for a woman who was vaccinated for the first time during her third trimester to have a “spontaneous abortion” in the first 20 weeks, since they weren’t vaccinated during the first 20 weeks (and pregnant women aren’t time travelers). Thus, those women shouldn’t be included in the denominator used to calculate the spontaneous abortion rate.

This study was used to tout the safety of vaccines during pregnancy. After scientists began to object over the obvious mathematical slight of hand, the study was retracted (if I remember correctly).

How do you square this with the fact that both Brett Weinstein and Steve Kirsch are jewish? There are jews on both sides of this debate and for a number reasons beyond just the vaccine debate, Weinstein and the “Intellectual Dark Web” are increasingly looking like a jewish psyop, so are Stew Peters and Dr Jane Ruby (who I believe is also probably jewish). There’s something very fishy about all of them although I won’t go into it all here.

I am anti-covid-vaxx by the way.

IMHO, Ron Unz isn’t a party to anything like what they are doing.

I’m not endorsing your thesis about aspartame and recent deaths. It sounds like a stretch. However, for those interested I’d like to relay the following anecdote. IMHO, avoid aspartame.

Years ago I started to experience frequent muscle twitches over different parts of my body. My primary care physician told me I didn’t have anything to worry about that they were just “benign fasciculations” and are actually quite common. Annoying but harmless.

This went on for years until I identified aspartame as the cause, or at least as an agent that was greatly exacerbating it. My job began requiring me to travel weekly out of state and on one of my trips I noticed that I had not been experiencing the twitches nearly as frequently. At home I always kept a 2 liter of artificially sweetened ginger ale in the fridge and drank it pretty much daily, always assuming it to be perfectly harmless, but while away had been eating all my meals in restaurants and had been drinking mostly water and unsweetened tea.

I was driving in my rental car when this light bulb had gone off, and so I pulled into a gas station, bought myself some chewing gum that used aspartame, chewed it and within 10 minutes or so these “fasciculations” came on with a vengeance. I completely cut that stuff out of my diet ever since.

That was around 16 years ago. By all accounts this “benign muscle fasciculation syndrome” should still be with me or gotten worse but it has basically disappeared.

Your mileage may vary, obviously, but I suspect aspartame is something that produces neurological effects and should only be consumed rarely in small amounts.

“In my latest article published last week, I noted that most anti-vaxxers have claimed that Covid vaccinations had produced a large wave of fatal heart attacks and strokes. However, although American deaths from those causes have indeed risen quite substantially from 2019, nearly all of that increase occurred in 2020, before the Covid vaccination drive began,”

Not according to this JAMA study, see Table A and B showing myo/pericarditis cases spiking in March ’21, (3 mos after vax rollout) not in 2020: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2782900

Great article. Thanks for the hard work!

However, I do now regard my recent pair of articles as quite conclusive on the subject, and I would welcome an opportunity to debate my analysis with Kirsch, Weinstein, or any other prominent anti-vaxxers.

A debate between yourself and Bret Weinstein would be epic. I’d love for this to happen.

McCarthy is a born shill, a spineless garbage human who doesn’t know anything and doesn’t care about anything, so it is very difficult to believe he is going to be able to make it two years without shilling for lobbyists, but I guess we’ll see.

And if anyone doubts this statement or considers it hyperbole, please read the following 6 part investigation by a former Green Beret over at National File:

https://nationalfile.com/kevin-mccarthy-subject-of-a-counterintelligence-investigation-allegiance-to-the-united-states/

Hi Ron Unz, I really enjoy your articles, but this one in particular looks like you relied on false data about New Zealand to draw your conclusions.
According to what I extracted from the website https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=104676 the absolute mortality excess in New Zealand are -159.6 for the year 2020 (negative mortality excess), 2169.2 for the year 2021 and 4870.8 for the first 44 weeks of 2022, which undoubtedly demonstrates a huge increase in mortality after the immunization campaigns with Pfizer and completely contradicts your conclusions. Could you clarify where you got that data that shows no increase in mortality in New Zealand after the vaccination campaigns?

He should be. But he completely refuses to even look at studies or evidence about the vaccines and about Ivermectin, not unless it is handed down to him from his professional, national pharmacy organization (forget what it’s called).

I think that’s when he first got really offended with me. He sent my sister and me a PDF that they had sent around to all pharmacies with a list of studies showing the lack of efficacy of Ivermectin and therefore it shouldn’t be used for COVID.

I took the time to look up each and every study and politely replied how each study was flawed, and why they appeared to be “designed to fail”. I think this is really what triggered him. Never question doctors or pharmacists about their field. They simply cannot handle criticism even if it’s polite and not being directly at them personally.

I love my brother to death and I’d do anything for him and his kids but God bless him he cannot take his expertise being called into question, even when if he’d just admit it, it wasn’t his “work” or personal efforts that resulted in any of these false claims being made in the first place and so he shouldn’t be taking it personally.

To the best of my knowledge, he hasn’t vaccinated his two daughters even though he had to butt heads with his wife about it. He won’t ever admit it but it really is my persistence that made him think twice and wait. I think on some level he worries I’m probably right and so he made the right choice for his kids.

As a hospital employee, I want to make one more observation that I’m in a unique position to have. Internally, in pushing us all to take the vaccine, our head nurse (now an executive) and our CFO made repeated claims to us (upon our requests for this information) that the vaccine was 97% effective at keeping people out of our COVID ICU.

This wouldn’t be obvious to anyone who doesn’t work at a hospital, but employees don’t have easy access to any official counts as to which patients are vaccinated or not. My brother, a pharmacist, claimed to me that a fellow pharmacist working at a much larger competing hospital in our area said to him they observed a 100% success rate for the vaccine at keeping people out of their ICU. When I showed him official statements from Israel, Australia, Norway and the UK that a relatively high percentage of people admitted into ICU’s had in fact been vaccinated, my obstinately pro-vaxx bother angrily responded “are you calling my friend a liar?!”

I had no response at that time because I had no official numbers at hand. But since then my manager showed me the actual census report for our ICU and general hospital admissions for COVID, vaxx’d versus un-vaxx’d. What I saw shocked me. At a time when our county was only 25% vaxx’d, a full 37% of the people in our ICU were fully vaxx’d. That was probably in mid-2021. By the time the CMS mandate had been approved, our ICU numbers showed that more than double of the people being admitted into our ICU had been vaccinated and double those in the hospital with COVID were vaccinated. This was just 2 days after our CFO and ICU nurse had again claimed in our town hall meeting announcing the CMS mandate that the vaccine has been “97% effective” at keeping people out of the ICU.

I generally don’t know these people to be liars and I would under ordinary circumstances trust in what they tell me. But I observed blatant lies being told by them to all of our fellow employees in order to get them vaccinated. I’ve never seen or been a part of anything like this before in my life. The fact that my own employer would lie like this and intentionally hide the real numbers from us more than prepared me to accept that the CDC is probably lying about death statistics, albeit in a more sophisticated way. And this is why I don’t believe Ron’s analysis, as well meaning as he may be. He’s using numbers provided by proven liars.

I want now to tell my brother that I know his friend’s not a liar, that her hospital administration had likely been the ones responsible for spreading fake numbers, but we have a silent agreement now to no longer talk about vaccinations. He’s so damn angry with me for discouraging others within our circle from getting vaccinated he can’t see straight when the topic comes up.

The AMA is America’s big medical association with 240,000 members, and a couple of months earlier, they’d announced that 96% of all their doctors had already been fully vaxxed:

The CDC, FDA, Pfizer and Moderna were all exempted from taking the vaccine, something that wouldn’t have been required if these organizations had anything like 96% voluntary compliance like the AMA claimed.

Besides, who do you trust more: The employees of the companies that created the vaccines who refused to take the shots? The FDA scientists responsible for fraudulently hiding evidence of myocarditis, neurological disorders, miscarriages and stillbirths and therefore begged a federal judge to give them 75 years to release Pfizer’s trial data? The CDC who repeatedly shirked their duty to monitor VAERS and lied repeatedly to the public about this while refusing to release the data of the V-Safe system which showed a 7.7% vaccine injury rate to the public?

Or should we trust the know-nothing AMA doctors who had no more clinical data at hand than we did as they were pressured by their hospitals to set a good example to everyone else by taking the vaccines?

I work at a hospital and I can assure that this is what happened. We got non-stop, 24/7 propaganda and screen-saver reminders at how the vaccines were proven “safe and effective”, a claim overt in its direct contradiction to their EUA status.

I suspect that if America’s security establishment had not been in the midst of trying to con every American, indeed everyone on the globe where they have reach, into taking the mRNA injections that their Mocking Bird media wouldn’t have acknowledged his book at all. By addressing his book even to criticize it would drive up its sales even more.

They addressed the part of the book they were forced to by the needs of the psychological operation currently under way at the time the book was published. The goal of attacking was to maintain narrative coherence in the media about vaccination by trying to discredit him on that one topic, obfuscating his vaccination arguments in the process. Any mention of the HIV/AIDS debate would’ve been counter productive partly because yes, his HIV/AIDS case is strong, but so is his vaccination case.

It’s a shame Sidney Schanberg isn’t around to look deeply into this.

There was nurse (in Florida, maybe) who went to trial for having given saline injections to hundreds of people without their knowledge to save them from getting the mRNA injection and she actually got away with it!

I work in the health industry and it was stated during “town hall” meetings our hospital held announcing the CMS mandate that numerous physicians in our system had not yet received the vaccine. I’m hearing through the grape vine that many doctors all over the place arranged to take a saline injection just like that nurse had done.

Frankly I don’t care what Goldman Sachs says about their company. What they demanded of their average employee could’ve been very different from what they demanded of the executives.

I very much agree. While I don’t share Ron’s view of the vaccines, he has done everyone a service by challenging the analysis of Ed Dowd. At the very least Ron has revealed that there is a disagreement in data sets provided by the CDC and other governments and that which was provided by insurance companies which Dowd is relying upon. This needs to be analyzed further to find out why. Are confounding variables obscuring causal relationships? Has there been any malfeasance in the way the CDC has collected and reported death statistics?

As we saw in 2020 an election was stolen from Trump even to the point of making a senile candidate appear to have gotten more votes than any political candidate in the history of the USA, even as Donald Trump broke all previous records himself. Would it really take that big a stretch of the imagination to think that the US’s security establishment has been working through government agencies like the CDC to obfuscate COVID deaths from vaccine deaths? The push to make a switch to mRNA technology was a DARPA project (via Moderna) from the beginning.

America’s security establishment needed a way to engage in biological warfare, which ostensibly requires the capability to quickly develop novel vaccines and bring them to market, and mRNA was the intended platform hailed to make this possible. As we now know from that Brownstone piece, every aspect of the US’s response to COVID was lead by the intelligence community where the FDA and CDC became junior partners via their politically appointed leaders.

It appears that the same security establishment that developed the COVID biological weapon has been behind all our major decisions in response to COVID including vaccination over treatment, mRNA tech over traditional vaccines, the lockdowns and control over all public messaging. This required bringing all of the FDA and CDC employees who might disagree to heal. And now that same security establishment has captured the FDA/CDC.

Something like 75% of the FDA and CDC employees were refusing the vaccines even as their leaders assured everyone that they are safe and effective. I even saw a Bitchute video of a high ranking FDA employee state in a hearing “Speaking on behalf of [thousands] of FDA employees, we wouldn’t give this vaccine to our families.“.

In Rand Paul’s hearings, Paul demanded to know how many people at the CDC had taken the vaccine because it was leaked that such a high number of their employees were refusing it. Rochelle Walensky claimed she didn’t have any idea.

Even as job mandates for the vaccine were pushed through, Pfizer and Moderna employees were all exempted from taking the vaccine.

The CDC hid their VSafe data which showed that 7.7% of the 10 million participants had various, severe reactions to the vaccine. This is very bad for a vaccine and shows that it is potentially very dangerous. During trials, all it takes is for adverse events to reach 5% for the trials to be shut down according to FDA regulations. The employee at Ventavia (subcontracting for Pfizer) who reported through an anonymous FDA hotline that the adverse reactions were already at 16% was fired by Ventavia by end of the day for whistleblowing. Apparently the anonymous hotline for whistleblowers wasn’t so anonymous after all.

Ventavia researchers at various trial sites contacted each other and confirmed that they were all seeing the same thing and that Ventavia had simply been deleting adverse reports from their database. Employees were told that times have changed and they need to start thinking about vaccine research differently (or something to this affect).

For anyone doubting this whistleblower’s story, the CDC’s own VSafe figure of 7.7% with 25% of recipients needing to miss work confirms her story that adverse events during the trials had easily exceeded the 5% threshold for shutting trials down.

The CDC’s Rochelle Walensky repeatedly lied about analyzing the VAERS system using the CDC’s standard methods. As was revealed by a FOIA request they had not performed any calculations after months of assuring everyone that calculations were being done weekly. Instead, petitioners were referred to the FDA. CDC/FDA leadership are using every intelligence trick in the book to hide the truth about vaccine safety from the public.

This begs the question: just who is capable of coordinating an effort across so many news outlets, agencies and media outlets like MedPageToday.com to obfuscate, lie and downright smear anyone who raises any doubts about both the origins of COVID and the wisdom of our vaccination program? The US security establishment. That’s who. The same people responsible for attacking China with the bioweapon to begin with.

Most of us aren’t prepared to let this go just because the highly captured CDC has produced a statistic with an alleged “smoking gun” that the heart attacks and strokes actually first appeared at the end of 2020 when several large life insurance companies say they didn’t notice anything like that. The insurance companies say they didn’t have an increase in death payouts until the vaccine rollout. This was well attested to at Ron Johnson’s hearings.

Thanks Ron for allowing a spirited debate to take place that has been, aside from one or two commenters, a relatively civil discussion.

… the angry insults of the hordes of agitated anti-vaxxers on this thread have been irritating, but at least this gives them somewhere to vent, so they don’t burden the discussions on other articles.

In private life, I have known perhaps three people whose skin is as thick as yours. In the public sphere, only Pat Buchanan and Kevin MacDonald can stay neck-and-neck with you when it comes to control of one’s temper. Frankly, after the far turn and in the stretch, I wouldn’t be surprised if you outlasted even them.

Thank you for tolerating me and others who think you are badly in error about a great many things but who either occasionally or frequently lose sight of the age-old conventions of host-guest relations. Were we all ancient Greeks, the consequences would be pretty sanguinary.

There are ways you can help Torba and the parallel economy. Get a free Gab account. There are advertisements for goods and services being solved by other Gabbers all the time. Some of these may be corporate but many are small family, American owned local businesses. There’s Gab TV and Gab Pay as well.

Thank you for this. I never would have seen it otherwise, and I wish this man Godspeed in his quest.

https://www.unz.com/estriker/national-justice-investigates-rising-republican-party-influencers-got-their-start-at-talent-agency-run-by-israeli-pornographer/

National Justice Investigates: Rising Republican Party Influencers Got Their Start At Talent Agency Run By Israeli Pornographer

They’re prominent guests on Fox, they lead “grassroots” rallies, they write columns at The Blaze, they are keynote speakers at CPAC, a few were even used to blackmail perceived enemies of Israeli interests — and they all got their start as actors and models at the same Israeli-owned talent agency.

These up and coming conservative superstars appear to have had or currently still have active profiles up at shadowy Israeli-born pornographer Ami Shafrir’s Explore Talent, National Justice can report.

So far, National Justice has identified the following household names in the world of Republican Party politics as being actors or models featured for hire on the site in the last ten years:

1) Candace Owens — who began producing professional conservative content months after launching her Explore Talent profile in 2017.

2) Congresswoman Lauren Boebert — participated in the site’s gallery contest in 2011, two years before opening up the “Shooters Grill” restaurant that brought her national fame and helped catapult her political career.

Thanks for the explanation. Some years back Glenn Greenwald came to my city in Colorado to pontificate on his journalistic heroism. After the talk I asked him why he accepts the official 9/11 cover-up report. He paused with great embarrassment and then blurted out that he defers to Noam Chomsky regarding 9/11. From that day forward I have never trusted anything Greenwald says.

Regarding chump-sky, not long ago I saw a talk in which he admits that even though MIT was ground zero for the military industrial state he still enjoyed working there. That tells me that he doesn’t really have a conscience and everything he says and does is just a kind of intellectual game, pretending to be the conscience of America. It’s just another Hollywood stunt.

Probably big Jewish Pharma’s biggest mistake was allowing the fine doctors that they had “cancelled” to survive after refusing to play along with the Narrative or remain silent. Now they make a powerful chorus: Yeadon, McCullough, Malone, Van der Bosche, Cole and so many others have already been stripped of their titles and positions and are standing up and pointing out how Judeafied (corrupted) the entire US “Health” system has become.

https://twitter.com/SpartaJustice/status/1609101323798028290

I haven’t read all the comments but haven’t seen anything about Antibody Dependent Enhancement and 1) its relationship to mRNA vaccines in general, or 2) what this relationship might possibly mean in light of China’s new “Zero non-Covid” policy in which the government has given up on trying to contain or eliminate covid but has instead decided to open up its economy (without travel restrictions) and encourage everyone to get the disease and in this way obtain herd immunity. (Apparently China’s corona virus vaccines don’t work, either.)

In somewhat related news, the February 2016 PubMed abstract linked below suggests that graphene oxide has been used for some time as a vaccine adjuvant but that it also has adverse effects:

“Current studies have revealed the immune effects of graphene oxide (GO) and have utilized them as vaccine carriers and adjuvants. However, GO easily induces strong oxidative stress and inflammatory reaction at the site of injection. It is very necessary to develop an alternative adjuvant based on graphene oxide derivatives for improving immune responses and decreasing side effects.”

Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26766427/

A bit of diligent searching online should reveal a good deal more on both of the topics above for those interested.

drawing our data from the CDC website, we can display a chart showing the monthly totals from January 2020 to November 2022:

The chart that is supposed to be following those words seems not to be reproducing on the webpage, though the other charts do show up.

In any case, I would caution against relying too much on CDC numbers. I had been downloading CDC data since the start of the pandemic, but found that each download wouldn’t tie back to the previous download. In other words, the CDC kept rejiggering their numbers to show whatever was the current “truth” they wanted it to show. I had to conclude that the agency was suffering from a severe case of regulatory capture, if not outright corruption, and gave up on using their data.

European public health numbers seem more reliable and consistent. Unfortunately, they do not make the vaccine appear so innocuous, though European governments are coy about examining the implications of their own data:

https://www.unz.com/isteve/nyt-in-white-lotus-why-didnt-all-the-bad-guys-lose-and-all-the-good-gals-win/#comment-5704239

https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=263047

That leaves aside reports that the vaccine itself may be creating more covid vulnerability than it cures:

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/urgent-two-new-studies-show-mrna

So it is not necessarily the case that post-2020 deaths “from covid” are not actually the responsibility of the vaccine.

And finally, I think what alarms people so much about the vaccines is that while covid deaths were overwhelmingly among the elderly or infirm, the recent wave of unexpected deaths is occurring very pronouncedly among the young and healthy, so the years of life lost are not comparable between the two scenarios in the way that a mere comparison of non-age-adjusted deaths would imply.

Anyway, thanks for including this subject in the reasoned and honest attention of your webzine.

#2 seems strong to me. Also, Ron is admittedly working from a bird’s eye view of things. Thailand and Taiwan (I believe it is both countries, but I know at least one of them) conducted a study showing that the vaccines in youth as many as 3% of them were getting myocarditis, albeit sub-clinically as many of them were not actually reporting chest pain. Increasingly nations are banning the youth from taking it.

Also, I think it is now generally admitted that the spike protein is toxic and is the likely culprit of myocarditis. The vaccine produces far, far more spike protein than a COVID infection, does not remain localized to the deltoid muscle as was initially claimed, and now we have studies showing your body can still be producing spike protein at 6 months post injection.

I say it is generally acknowledged because even the drug companies admitted that spike is toxic. After this was discovered and became widely understood they claimed that they had made slight alterations to their spike protein to make them safer. However, how could they have noticed this and “fixed” it without testing? Their original papers state that the alterations were made to make them more immunogenic, not safer. And if they somehow knew the spike was dangerous, why didn’t they contribute that knowledge to the public while everyone was trying to figure out why COVID is so different from other corona viruses?

I realize this doesn’t prove that the vaccines are more deadly than COVID. It is merely suggestive. However, we shouldn’t be limiting this discussion to deaths alone but also to quality of life. Bizarrely the CDC had to be sued into releasing their VSafe data that they were keeping as a closely guarded secret. Their data shows that 25% of the 10 million people enrolled in the program had negative reactions to the vaccine and 7.7% were bad enough that they had to seek medical care from a health care provider. According to official sources, 262,908,216 Americans received the COVID vaccine. 7.7% would mean 20 million people in the US alone. That number is so high I’m sure there something I must be missing here. Notice though that the CDC is dead silent on this.

Finally, if Ron’s analysis is correct it makes me wonder why the CDC hasn’t gone out of its way to have autopsies performed that would definitely rule out the vaccine as the cause. Robert Malone was discussing the autopsies that have been performed on suspected vaccine deaths (I believe these were in Germany) and what they found w the spike protein exclusively in the heart tissue, and no evidence was found of other parts of the virus having been present.

Regardless, I appreciate Ron’s analysis. I think it’s very helpful. It goes to show you that the anti-vaxxers haven’t made their case as well as they think they have and it’s back to the drawing board for them. I just can’t understand why the CDC whose really in a better position to lay this to rest doesn’t step up their efforts at a more detailed analysis.

But the Zapruder film you link to below clearly shows that the car is moving already as the final, kill shot is made. The car then accelerates in speed as the secret service agent is trying to hop into the back of car.

In keeping with Ron’s previous statements regarding avoiding claims about alternative treatments for COVID and other issues that in his estimation are better left for the medical community to decide, I’ll try to avoid making any specific claims but I would like to run this hypothetical by:

Imagine if instead of our federal government offering a) money for every patient put on a ventilator and b) bonus money for every patient prescribed Remdesivir, that the government had offered bonus money for every confirmed COVID patient that was checked into the hospital (due to COVID) that did not die in their care while at the same time refraining from issuing any strong opinions for or against using repurposed drugs (Ivermectin/HCQ) or other treatments such as intravenous vitamin C/D/Glutathione, etc. Instead, some even very prominent doctors lost their licenses for adding Vitamin C to the treatment regimen of their patients.

Everyone these days talks as though nothing is known about medicine without “evidence based medicine” having established the validity of a given treatment through lengthy and costly double-blind, placebo controlled trials published in top medical journals (many of which happen to receive funding from drug companies) and approved by government bureaucrats. However, nothing is further from the truth. The advent of inoculations (which first occurred in the 1720’s when black slaves reportedly had discovered that by infecting an open sore on someone with the bodily fluids from a pox from another person offered protection from catching the disease) down to the discovery that amphetamines help reduce hyperactivity in children (this was discovered on a “hunch” by a doctor who had himself experimented with amphetamines), most of our medicine did not come about through what today counts as “evidence based medicine” which is slowly coming to mean “the evidence that drug companies have paid for”.

I bet if some scenario had played out in our country as I described above, that of paying hospitals bonuses for patients who survive COVID on their watch rather than for those who died from it, we’d have found out really quick in this country –trusting in the observation powers of our nation’s top doctors– what treatment protocols were really best to use in a hospital setting.

Trump has some leverage at this point. He should approach DeSantis and work out a deal that would benefit Trump, DeSantis, and the Republican party.

I concur:

• DeSantis should start workIng to help Trump win in 2024.
• Trump would be termed out, and support a DeSantis win in 2028.

This is the most powerful possible MAGA deal, which is why they Fake Stream Media will do everything they can to disregard or even kill it. SJW Globalists need a fight within MAGA. The best move is for MAGA to remain united behind Trump 2024.

🎄 MERRY CHRISTMAS 🎄

It all might’ve been OK if he had said, “All of the funds from the sales of my new cards will go to building a political fund to help me defeat the Democrats in 2024. Unlike Ron DeSanctimonius, I won’t be accepting any political donations from establishment donors.”

This would’ve made these cheesy superhero cards one of the most genius political moves in the modern era.

Instead what we see is a Trump whose already given up on any genuine attempt at winning and is cashing in on his notoriety before it’s too late.

Fuck Trump, this is a joke. I thought he was going to announce DeSantis as his running mate, which may or not make sense, but I thought he was serious when he said he had a major announcement. Our entire civilization is being destroyed and this guy is just screwing around. I kept hanging on, because he’s all we’ve got. I don’t know how anybody can have to nerve to treat this like it’s normal times.

My guess is that Trump is actually being blackmailed and ordered to make a complete fool of himself now. (Did you know Trump was introduced to Melania through Jeffrey Epstein? I didn’t.) I’ve been saying for literally 25 years or more that there must be a Blackmail Inc in existence because how could there not be. I just saw this Whitney Webb girl on Jimmy Dore and it is 20x worse than I thought. I had always heard what I thought to be mafia defamation of J. Edgar Hoover being a sissy, but after listening to her I searched images of JEH and his “companion” Clyde Tolson; it’s so obvious these guys were queer, they even wear matching suits some of the time. The point is, all the “conspiracies” are not only true but I never would’ve believed it was this bad, ran this deep, and went back so far in our history. This girl ties it ALL together in her 2 volume book. We can leap frog over miles of useless analysis if we understand how systemic all the fraud deceit blackmail etc are. No wonder the middle class has been powerless to affect change over the last 50 years. We haven’t stood a chance the whole time. You simply must watch this video or you are wasting you time trying to make sense of events. I know I have been. She also “lists” the jew, if not naming them. Whitney Webb:

Most ‘believers’ today are quite willing to reduce the numbers, and move hither and thither where and how the ‘victims’ were killed, in order to continue to believe something terrible beyond belief happened to the jews (especially), but to Poles, Catholics, Gypsies too–even Jehovah’s Witnesses. So just trying to make them question the numbers is not enough. They can do that and keep the rest of it, such as continuing to hold the Jews blameless.

They’ll also decide the “Holocaust” is not that important if it means they have to change their whole world view. And changing their worldview is what’s important to us, is it not? For that, they have to “get” most of it. I’m thinking that with all the lies being exposed currently, including from government, intelligence agencies, and top media, people should be applying it to these past events. How could they not?

I’m thinking Tucker Carlson MUST be wondering about the truth of the Nazi menace and the holocaust by now.