Sure, that's a perfectly valid criticism and frankly I often have to grit my teeth with embarrassment as I try to figure out a way to shoehorn my Covid origins analysis into the end of an article that's only somewhat related.
Not to criticize, Mr. Unz, but why do nearly always end your articles by switching to your pet Covid theory, when the rest of essay is unrelated, except for the censorship angle. Of course, as our benevolent host it’s your prerogative.
If shoehorning is all that remains, then shoehorning it must be.
Just be careful with your teeth! Maybe wear a mouthguard while working on the end of non-related articles.
You’re in good company, though. It looks as though James O’Keefe, founder of Project Veritas, is being or has been sacked by Project Veritas’s Board of Directors for his recent journalism on much the same thing, though he survives on twitter for now: https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1618771943855120386 (legendary video, a must-watch if you haven’t seen it). Video can be viewed here if you’re not on twitter: https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1618736315343724546/pu/vid/1280×720/wmoakWkLq8HRz5pu.mp4?tag=14.
Great reply, thanks. And thanks for the links, they look interesting.
“the only possible explanation I can think of is that they are planning to up the ante and start a world war, which they think they will win”
If you go to the zionist oligarchs’ WEF website at weforum.org, they tell you some of their policies. One of the main ones is deindustrialisation of the countries they control – the West and the EU. Covid lockdowns and refusal to buy cheap Russian energy are recent applications of that policy. After Ukraine, I’m not sure what is next in the deindustrialisation pipeline, perhaps Taiwan or a ratcheting up of the climate change propaganda, or maybe another artificial pandemic, or something else.
There are many layers of the onion of truth. One of the layers of obfuscation/distraction/misdirection is that the current Ukrainian conflict is about weakening Russia. If that were so, the economic sanctions on Russia would have been discarded in the summer or would’ve never started due to the sanctions making Russia stronger both economically and politically, which was forecast by many ordinary people back in February and March last year.
Ukraine is mainly about deindustrialising the West and the EU, which are run by hostile zionist oligarchs. That’s why the sanctions continue even though it’s beyond obvious to any thinking person that the West and the EU are suffering from them, while Russia has returned to growth and is building stronger ties with much of the non-Western world, including important countries like China and India (and Turkey).
For further details on the ongoing, planned deindustrialisation of the West and the EU (and the advancement of tyranny in those places), see the zionist oligarchs’ World Economic Forum (WEF) website at weforum.org. They’re NOT doing it because they care about the environment or have anyone’s interests at heart except their own and Israel’s. Note that Israel cheerleads for the war in Ukraine and sanctions on Russia, but does not participate in the sanctions itself.
Does anyone still think that Ukraine war is not a Jew show?
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/blackrock-plots-to-buy-ukraine/
African Americans are a protected class in America. You can’t point out the fact that they are more criminal and less intelligent on average. 85 average iq and 60 percent of known homicide offenders= hate stats. Jews, gays, Muslims, blacks= Off limits
Fuck around and find out–meet the new boss same as the old boss.
I think you didn’t understand why Ron Unz put the JFK assassination and the covid origin issues together. It’s to do with the cover-ups, specifically how the intelligence ‘services’ persuade relevant, important people to support the public cover-up story.
JFK:-
Reality: It was a Mossad-planned operation with CIA assistance (a CIA faction)
Private cover story to convince important people to support the public cover story: Oswald was a Russian agent but this can’t be disclosed because it might start WW3
Public cover story: Oswald was a lone agent
Covid origin:-
Reality: Covid’s an American-made virus, used in biowarfare attacks in Wuhan and Iran
Private cover story to convince important people to support the public cover story: Covid’s a Chinese-made virus, accidentally released, but this can’t be disclosed because it might start WW3
Public cover story: Covid’s of natural origin
They’re the same modus operandi, with carrot and stick for those able to think for themselves. Flatter the important people (and unsuccessful truth-seekers) with a bit of fake inside knowledge (carrot) while simultaneously fear-mongering them with WW3 (stick), and they’ll all help to keep the truth hidden.
To speculate, I think zionists are behind both of those foul schemes and the subsequent cover ups (and many others) – the JFK assassination because it’s obvious how zionists benefitted via the Dimona nuclear reactor being allowed to continue, and the covid origin+attack because the Western lockdown responses were exactly in line with achieving the zionist oligarchs’ WEF-promoted agendas of increasing zionist control and the de-industrialisation of the West and the EU.
I expect these ops to continue for as long as zionists control the West. The most high-profile, zionist-oligarch op at the moment is the Ukraine conflict, which has the same two main goals as covid and may turn out to be even more successful.
It’s been almost sixty years since JFK was assassinated, and it’s tempting for some to think that Washington corruption really only began around that time. But there is a mountain of evidence that our government has been deeply corrupt for many years prior. Some trace it to Lincoln’s presidency and some trace it even farther back to the very founding of our country. Entire books have been written documenting all of it.
Granted, government corruption, schemes, assassinations, and crimes against foreign nations have increased since 1963, but there was never a genuinely ‘innocent era’ in America’s history as some might assume. And this will always be the case whenever deeply flawed, selfish and wicked humans are involved.
The problem today is that the government doesn’t try too hard to conceal its lies as it once did. This is because there is little accountability for elected officials and government officers for what they say and do. Sure, there might be some congressional committee interrogations now and then, but few if any actually pay for their crimes against the American people.
Our complicit media, of course, gladly spins all stories that might place any democrat administration in a poor light. All we get 24 hours a day are lies and half-truths. None of the establishment news outlets can be trusted, and only the most careful and discerning readers or listeners are able to sift through it all and arrive at the truth.
I no longer immediately dismiss seemingly outrageous and ‘conspiratorial’ stories anymore as I once did. Stories such as the 9-11 coverup, the lies behind the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, the truth about Hitler and WW2, the truth about Jewish cultural and economic subversion, the Covid pandemic, including a host of other inconvenient factual realities has led me to question everything the government tells me. Their continual lies have conditioned me to do so.
One main reason the Deep State doesn't try to conceal its duplicity is they believe they are in complete control and that the US citizenry is mostly stupid...sadly they are right.
The problem today is that the government doesn’t try too hard to conceal its lies as it once did. This is because there is little accountability for elected officials and government officers for what they say and do.
Now, all we need is Carlson, or someone of that stature, to name Mossad too. Dulles, Helms, Hunt and Angleton, even figures like C. Douglas Dillion, and many others in that wonderful club, all knew the deal–Israel and international Jewry.
Nah, that remains our job. Unlike the "big names", we don't risk our lives by sharing the facts. Lots of people will discover the trail to the JQ thanks to the current attention on the JFK murder. As always, it's up to us little(r) people to point folks in the right direction.Probably better that way too. - Folks always seem to be looking for some sort of Pied Piper to follow, which in turn seems to dull their senses. :)Kind regards,
Now, all we need is Carlson, or someone of that stature, to name Mossad too.
The jews will drive the west directly into the ground and then blame the destruction on white supremacy.
China exploiting Russia’s desperation and buying it’s natural gas and oil at a massive discount is not quite the win you think it is.
It is a win for China. I commend their intelligence in giving Russia false promises at the Winter Olympics of helping them out militarily (through satellite intel, much in the same way NATO is helping Ukraine) in the event of an invasion, only to ditch them and then rape them for their natural resources.
The Chinese are realists, they see how Russia has the largest hydrocarbon reserves in the world and despite this, 20% of its people still lack indoor plumbing and it has Africa-levels of STDs
I say good on the Chinese for exploiting those moskal scum.
I don’t even have to look it up first to know that the streets of St. Petersburg are going to be cleaner that almost any American city, it comes down to not having many blacks.
Anglin, you are hilarious. China is trying to to keep their economy from falling off a cliff because of the mendacity of the CCP and its pets. All the while, Putin is presiding over an economy that is in the tank already. St. Petersburg doesn’t even have the money to keep their streets clear.
The corruption your hero Putin has facilitated and received the benefits of, has hollowed the country out. But, hang onto your Putinazi delusions. They will soon come crashing down around your ears.
“ Trump offspring, inter-married with Jews.”
Don’t forget Hunter Biden’s sexy young wife Melissa Cohen. Wow!
That's not how ordinary people think. They don't expect heavily armed foreigners from far-away lands to 'liberate' them from their domestic governments. People collaborate with foreign invaders in order to survive, to get money, status, other advantages, but not to be 'liberated'. Ordinary people typically aren't fools (although intellectuals often are).Replies: @German_reader, @Jaakko Raipala, @AP
Even as it was, there seem to have been many in Russia (not just in Ukraine and the recently annexed Baltics or Eastern Poland) who hated the Soviet system and mistakenly thought Germans would “liberate” them.
That’s not how ordinary people think. They don’t expect heavily armed foreigners from far-away lands to ‘liberate’ them from their domestic governments.
You are the last person to guess about how ordinary people think.
A lot of people didn’t think of the Bolshevik gang as their domestic government. There were mass surrenders, and many cases of locals greeting the Germans as liberators early on, before the Germans revealed themselves.
Quartermaster is a troll, I think possibly a paid one as he repeats regime talking points, or the official propaganda narrative.
From what I get out of these excerpts, James Morris’ daughter, besides resenting how this “transition” changed her childhood for the worse, cares most that her ex-Dad didn’t use his new status to help the cause of feminism. Not everybody, or pretty much not ANYBODY, can be a secretary anymore, but the rest of Mr. Morris’ views on female roles is traditionally conservative.
I.e, it sounds like this daughter did not have the courage and/or wisdom to actually criticize the whole idea of transitioning. She’s just pissed that her famous Dad didn’t help out the feminazis.
… or, maybe she knows how resentful her former Dad was about how his ex-brother Uncle Mark, now his ex-sister Marsha, turned out much better, with more rounded breasts and nice long blond straight hair. Why is it always Marsha, Marsha, Marsha?!
Trans takes narcissism to a whole 'nother level.
You don’t get to become whoever or whatever you want to be merely by deciding that’s who or what you are. And you don’t get to demand that others kowtow to you by treating your laughable delusions as if they were facts.
Yup. That was my impression – a mentally ill narcissist. To a great degree, this narcissism is the opposite of love, which ought to be the highest of human ideals. And love, of course, is the selfless giving of oneself to others, which, among women, is best expressed through the giving of life to her offspring (even at the risk of her own life) and caring for them – in other words, motherhood. “Trans women” grotesquely pervert this ideal and disfigure the very definition of womanhood into a warped imitation of the feminine physical form and the complete absence of what really makes for a woman spiritually.
My recent thinking on it is that it's an inversion of the proper relationship we should have with ourselves. We should love ourselves, but in the way a parent loves a child. If instead we put our "I" at the service of our "self" it leads to all sorts of disorder and deviation from truth, just as it would if a parent allowed a small child to be his/her master.
To a great degree, this narcissism is the opposite of love, which ought to be the highest of human ideals.
Terrific sentence Twinkie.Yeah, even allowing for "damaged daughter" retelling, this is a guy who basically doesn't give a shit about his family. They are props for his egotistical drama. Hideous deformed creature.
To a great degree, this narcissism is the opposite of love, which ought to be the highest of human ideals.
James Morris (1926-2020), later Jan Morris, was likely the greatest travel writer in the English language of his generation.
I doubt it. How good can you really be, if you become totally bonkers and think you can “turn into a woman”? It shows a total detachment from objective reality, which doesn’t sound good for a travel writer. Never read him, never will.
I’ve gone from genuine tolerance of these creatures to a profound aversion to them. This has less to do with the physical aspects of their transition, ridiculous and unseemly though they are, than it does with disgust at their arrogance. You don’t get to become whoever or whatever you want to be merely by deciding that’s who or what you are. And you don’t get to demand that others kowtow to you by treating your laughable delusions as if they were facts.
I don’t wish any of these self-mutilating freaks well.
Spot on Kylie. Arrogance.The whole story is just family abuse. But I thought this was the key bit:
I’ve gone from genuine tolerance of these creatures to a profound aversion to them. This has less to do with the physical aspects of their transition, ridiculous and unseemly though they are, than it does with disgust at their arrogance. You don’t get to become whoever or whatever you want to be merely by deciding that’s who or what you are. And you don’t get to demand that others kowtow to you by treating your laughable delusions as if they were facts.
The reality, as my mother told me, was that my sister lay dying in hospital and Jan refused to go with my mother to visit her. … Jan’s words, then and ever after, completely failed to show any understanding of her pain. She had no empathy.Basically, these people are sociopaths. Extremely narcissistic sociopaths.The whole story here is complete disregard for the interest of his (its) family, to feed its overweening ego. The family would have been much better off if this POS just killed itself, left. Left them alone to get on with it. But it needed a stage and the family were props to be abused.In a sane society we'd just immediately expel such POS. But no ... they are a minority! And minorities are special. The rest of us must live our lives to support minorities, give them stuff and make sure their oh-so-special feelings are never, ever hurt.
Basically, a fetishist whose life revolved around the fetish.
From the article:
Basically, a fetishist whose life revolved around the fetish.
A precise description of The Man Who Would Be Queen.
What did she want to be? I believe she wanted to be someone totally different from anyone else, a woman who was the centre of attention because of her difference. She was no ordinary woman, as she believed the rest of us were. She was always talked about, always put on some pedestal. Her ego was massive, with people constantly rubbing it. She was a woman who enjoyed being in a man’s world because she stood out.
And yet the greatest European civilizations were Italian and Greek.
They get dragged down in I Q tests by the warner clime Southern Europeans.
I'm not sure what this even means. The Japanese really didn't invent much.Replies: @lloyd, @Biff, @Brian Damage
The Japanese are about as clever and stupid as Northern Europeans. The only race that invented on its own Western type culture and technology was the Japanese.
@lloyd
They get dragged down in I Q tests by the warner clime Southern Europeans
.
And yet the greatest European civilizations were Italian and Greek.
The Japanese are about as clever and stupid as Northern Europeans. The only race that invented on its own Western type culture and technology was the Japanese.
I’m not sure what this even means. The Japanese really didn’t invent much.
Those Anglos always want to justify their superiority by highlighting the last 200 years against the evolutionary process of hundreds of thousands of years. Not enough sample. Perhaps a couple of millennia is enough sample.
200 years? WTF...Replies: @Brian Damage
highlighting the last 200 years
Thanks for the information, which doesn't really surprise me. I'd asked a couple of people whose views I trust, and they seemed to have a good opinion of Sachs. Also, he came across as quite sincere in those video interviews, including when he personally raised the Russian privatization issue.
Obviously, that aid was not forthcoming. Krainer also writes that Sachs advocated for debt relief for Russia, something that Sachs had helped obtain for Poland (50% relief) and Bolivia (90% relief). On the contrary, the G7 threatened Russia with food aid cutoff if government debt service was interrupted at all.
So Sachs looks moral and caring even then, and the piratical, evil West looks evil, even then.
Yes, I think Sachs is sincere too; he’s definitely scared of WW3 and I think at 68 he’s accepted that he’s now basically been retired, or cancelled for truth-telling on the covid origin, and he’s decided to be open with what he thinks because it’s important to the world (personally, I think WW3 is still a very low probability in at least the near future).
I’ve never heard of that Naomi Klein book nor had I heard of Sachs until maybe a few months ago, and it appears to me he was never an intentionally bad guy, just perhaps overwhelmingly naive and a tool of machiavellians. He still appears to be somewhat naive now, actually.
So I reckon Sachs is good enough as far as he goes, but he doesn’t go very far. Judging from his recent, upset comments in one of those videos along the lines of “America has to learn to play in the sandbox nicely!”, he has yet to meet the final boss in the game of geopolitical knowledge, which boss is, to put it bluntly, overwhelming, malevolent jewish oligarchical power in conjunction with widespread jewish tribalism, in the West, the EU and Israel, and I suspect he never will beat that boss if he meets it.
So it seems Sachs was well-meaning even then.Replies: @Wizard of Oz, @Antiwar7
During his final trip to Moscow in the [sic] early 1995, Jeffrey Sachs himself warned Western officials about this blatantly corrupt scheme, but it appeared that none were moved by his warnings.
Krainer further states:
When Jeffrey Sachs drafted his shock therapy recommendations, he estimated that for the reforms to succeed, Soviet Union would need financial support of about $15 billion per year for many years.
Obviously, that aid was not forthcoming. Krainer also writes that Sachs advocated for debt relief for Russia, something that Sachs had helped obtain for Poland (50% relief) and Bolivia (90% relief). On the contrary, the G7 threatened Russia with food aid cutoff if government debt service was interrupted at all.
So Sachs looks moral and caring even then, and the piratical, evil West looks evil, even then.
Thanks for the information, which doesn't really surprise me. I'd asked a couple of people whose views I trust, and they seemed to have a good opinion of Sachs. Also, he came across as quite sincere in those video interviews, including when he personally raised the Russian privatization issue.
Obviously, that aid was not forthcoming. Krainer also writes that Sachs advocated for debt relief for Russia, something that Sachs had helped obtain for Poland (50% relief) and Bolivia (90% relief). On the contrary, the G7 threatened Russia with food aid cutoff if government debt service was interrupted at all.
So Sachs looks moral and caring even then, and the piratical, evil West looks evil, even then.
Regarding Jeffrey Sachs morphing into a ‘good guy’… I too have had a really hard time believing such a senior ‘bad guy’, who surely knew precisely what he was doing in 1990’s Russia, could change his stripes so completely…
This recent article (posted last weekend at lewrockwell.com) suggests that Jeffrey Sachs’ recent activities are as malevolently motivated as ever… a must read…
https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/drastic-founder-renounces-lab-leak?utm_source=cross-post&publication_id=834349&post_id=89064796&isFreemail=true&utm_campaign=677727&utm_medium=email
That issue about Sachs has come up several times before, and having now watched several of his long interviews, including his discussion of his 1990s activities in Russia, he seems quite sincere to me and makes a plausible case that he was unfairly blamed for Russia's economic disaster. The Russians themselves certainly seem to agree, since they regularly quote him in very respectful terms in their leading media outlets.
Regarding Jeffrey Sachs morphing into a ‘good guy’… I too have had a really hard time believing such a senior ‘bad guy’, who surely knew precisely what he was doing in 1990’s Russia, could change his stripes so completely…
At the time it was noised about that he might run for the senate seat to be vacated by retiring incumbent Daniel Patrick Moynihan.
JFK jr.s death is another mysterious one: strange how it happened shortly after his magazine “George” published a lengthy article on the early upbringing and life of ‘slick Willy’.
“Hillary Rodham Clinton won that race.”
Hillary began her side career as a CIA asset whilst serving as a staff lawyer for the House Judiciary Committee investigating Watergate. Democratic lawyer Jerry Zeifman, in charge of the investigation, recommended her removal from staff due to “corrupt and unethical behavior.” Speculation posits she was collecting blackmail dirt that came in the huge haul of documents and reports related to the periphery of the Watergate investigation from the DOJ, FBI, Capitol Police. Specifically, information related to pedophilia. A subject that comes up again in reports from her time as Obama’s Secretary of State when it is known that she personally supervised a DC prostitution ring catering to visiting foreign dignitaries who had a taste for young flesh.
Hillary’s relationship to the Podesta brothers — still powerful DC lobbyists — generated a lot of grist for the conspiracy mill during Trump’s administration. The Podestas are well known for their taste in art that features images of tortured children and cannibalism. Through a series of leaked texts, Tony Podesta is directly linked to a woman, whose name currently escapes me, a member of Hillary’s inner circle, who operated what can only be described as a bordello for elite DC customers interested in children located in rural Maryland.
Recently, Tony Podesta’s niece, Lesley, quit her position at Twitter during the Musk purge. What was her position at Twitter? A member of the Trust and Safety Council, the bailiwick of which was monitoring and eliminating content that dealt with child abuse and pedophilia.
Any research into the 1990s parapolitics scene is going to include a large helping of Hillary. She was the queen (of blood) behind the scene.
Agreed! Is the name you couldn't recall Huma Abedin?
Any research into the 1990s parapolitics scene is going to include a large helping of Hillary. She was the queen (of blood) behind the scene.
Yes, Trump’s claim was based on his near complete ignorance of what happened in WWII. However, a quote from Nikita Khrushchev’s memoirs should also be taken into account by Mr. Margolis:
“I would like to express my candid opinion about Stalin’s views on whether the Red Army and the Soviet Union could have coped with Nazi Germany and survived the war without aid from the United States and Britain. First, I would like to tell about some remarks Stalin made and repeated several times when we were “discussing freely” among ourselves. He stated bluntly that if the United States had not helped us, we would not have won the war. If we had had to fight Nazi Germany one on one, we could not have stood up against Germany’s pressure, and we would have lost the war. No one ever discussed this subject officially, and I don’t think Stalin left any written evidence of his opinion, but I will state here that several times in conversations with me he noted that these were the actual circumstances. He never made a special point of holding a conversation on the subject, but when we were engaged in some kind of relaxed conversation, going over international questions of the past and present, and when we would return to the subject of the path we had traveled during the war, that is what he said. When I listened to his remarks, I was fully in agreement with him, and today I am even more so.”
The number of Lend Lease transport vehicles alone, about 11,000, capable of handling the Soviet Union’s terrible road system were of great significance in that without them Soviet ground forces would be incapable of engaging anything resembling a war of maneuver.
Having been to East Germany and spoken to people there that experienced its handover to the USSR first hand, I can tell you this is complete BS. They told me the Americans left with their trucks and jeeps and the Soviet Army came in with their horses and wagonsThe Second World War was a war of attrition, and Germany simply did not have the resources or manpower to outlast the USSR. Once German troops were stopped before Moscow, it was only a question of time.Replies: @Ahem, @Obama's boyfriend
The number of Lend Lease transport vehicles alone, about 11,000, capable of handling the Soviet Union’s terrible road system were of great significance in that without them Soviet ground forces would be incapable of engaging anything resembling a war of maneuver.
Seeing as Germany posed no threat to either Britain or the USA, their participation at all was ill-advised, at least. I recall James Burnham’s satirical description of America’s WWII crusade: “A war against totalitarianism in alliance with the principal totalitarian power.”
Jon,
just because you don’t remember where you were in re: Enron, doesn’t make it less important. obviously lives lost are more important in reality and memories, but that isn’t what Krugman or Unz’s point is about
Replies: @Quartermaster, @Astuteobservor II, @Rehmat, @Anonymous, @Israel Shamir, @Truth, @ohmy
As I examined the path the Nazis took out of Europe, I struggled to understand how so many of them had made it to America so easily while so many Holocaust survivors were left behind.
One answer came in a copy of Gen. George S. Patton’s handwritten journal. In one entry from 1945, Patton, who oversaw the D.P. operations for the United States, seethed after reading Harrison’s findings, which he saw — quite accurately — as an attack on his own command.
“Harrison and his ilk believe that the Displaced Person is a human being, which he is not, and this applies particularly to the Jews who are lower than animals,” Patton wrote. He complained of how the Jews in one camp, with “no sense of human relationships,” would defecate on the floors and live in filth like lazy “locusts,” and he told of taking his commander, Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower, to tour a makeshift synagogue set up to commemorate the holy day of Yom Kippur.
“We entered the synagogue, which was packed with the greatest stinking mass of humanity I have ever seen,” Patton wrote. “Of course, I have seen them since the beginning and marveled that beings alleged to be made in the form of God can look the way they do or act the way they act.”
Other evidence emerged revealing not only Patton’s disdain for the Jews in the camps, but an odd admiration for the Nazi prisoners of war under his watch.
Under Patton, Nazis prisoners were not only bunked at times with Jewish survivors, but were even allowed to hold positions of authority, despite orders from Eisenhower to “de-Nazify” the camps. “Listen,” Patton told one of his officers of the Nazis, “if you need these men, keep them and don’t worry about anything else.”
Whoever killed Patton (the Russians or the Americans) did a good thing – otherwise there would be a USSR-US war in 1945, as Churchill wanted and demanded. If Patton would get to power, he and Churchill would unleash the most horrible war. Mind you, many Russian soldiers and officers of that time thought it would be good to fight to the very end and place the Red banner on the Capitol Hill. The Red Army was very strong then. So it was good to get rid of Patton and bring peace. Naturally kudos to Ron Unz for uncovering the story!
well, with all due respect sir, I disagree
So it was good to get rid of Patton and bring peace.
Replies: @Quartermaster, @Astuteobservor II, @Rehmat, @Anonymous, @Israel Shamir, @Truth, @ohmy
As I examined the path the Nazis took out of Europe, I struggled to understand how so many of them had made it to America so easily while so many Holocaust survivors were left behind.
One answer came in a copy of Gen. George S. Patton’s handwritten journal. In one entry from 1945, Patton, who oversaw the D.P. operations for the United States, seethed after reading Harrison’s findings, which he saw — quite accurately — as an attack on his own command.
“Harrison and his ilk believe that the Displaced Person is a human being, which he is not, and this applies particularly to the Jews who are lower than animals,” Patton wrote. He complained of how the Jews in one camp, with “no sense of human relationships,” would defecate on the floors and live in filth like lazy “locusts,” and he told of taking his commander, Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower, to tour a makeshift synagogue set up to commemorate the holy day of Yom Kippur.
“We entered the synagogue, which was packed with the greatest stinking mass of humanity I have ever seen,” Patton wrote. “Of course, I have seen them since the beginning and marveled that beings alleged to be made in the form of God can look the way they do or act the way they act.”
Other evidence emerged revealing not only Patton’s disdain for the Jews in the camps, but an odd admiration for the Nazi prisoners of war under his watch.
Under Patton, Nazis prisoners were not only bunked at times with Jewish survivors, but were even allowed to hold positions of authority, despite orders from Eisenhower to “de-Nazify” the camps. “Listen,” Patton told one of his officers of the Nazis, “if you need these men, keep them and don’t worry about anything else.”
Quoting THE JEW YORK TIMES as a reliable source is just like believing that the Grand Mufti of Palestine twisted Hitler’s arms to carry-out genocide of non-Zionist European Jews.
https://rehmat1.com/2015/10/22/netanyahu-absolves-hitler-of-holocaust/
Patton was a virulent anti-Semite and Nazi sympathizer. He was planning to go on record and publicly deny the Holocaust and was assassinated as a result:
As I examined the path the Nazis took out of Europe, I struggled to understand how so many of them had made it to America so easily while so many Holocaust survivors were left behind.
One answer came in a copy of Gen. George S. Patton’s handwritten journal. In one entry from 1945, Patton, who oversaw the D.P. operations for the United States, seethed after reading Harrison’s findings, which he saw — quite accurately — as an attack on his own command.
“Harrison and his ilk believe that the Displaced Person is a human being, which he is not, and this applies particularly to the Jews who are lower than animals,” Patton wrote. He complained of how the Jews in one camp, with “no sense of human relationships,” would defecate on the floors and live in filth like lazy “locusts,” and he told of taking his commander, Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower, to tour a makeshift synagogue set up to commemorate the holy day of Yom Kippur.
“We entered the synagogue, which was packed with the greatest stinking mass of humanity I have ever seen,” Patton wrote. “Of course, I have seen them since the beginning and marveled that beings alleged to be made in the form of God can look the way they do or act the way they act.”
Other evidence emerged revealing not only Patton’s disdain for the Jews in the camps, but an odd admiration for the Nazi prisoners of war under his watch.
Under Patton, Nazis prisoners were not only bunked at times with Jewish survivors, but were even allowed to hold positions of authority, despite orders from Eisenhower to “de-Nazify” the camps. “Listen,” Patton told one of his officers of the Nazis, “if you need these men, keep them and don’t worry about anything else.”
Stalin understood that he was freeing Hitler to strike in the west by making a pact with Hitler. In effect he facilitated it. The British considered the Soviet Union to be the real problem. Stalin had already grabbed the Baltic states plus parts of Finland and Romania. The British were mobilizing against the USSR over the war with Finland even after declaring war with Germany. The British guarantee to Poland originally covered only their independence not territory; the British thought allowing Germany to take Polish land was acceptable and it would make war between Germany and the USSR quite likely (Chamberlain’s strategy was to let Hitler and Stalin into conflict). Only after the Nazi-Soviet Pact was announced was the guarantee extended to Poland's territory because at that point the British decided war was necessary; Germany and the USSR being friendly was not acceptable as it meant Hitler was going to go West instead of East.
He said Chamberlain’s position in 1938 was that England had nothing with which to fight and that she could not risk going to war with Hitler. Kennedy’s view: That Hitler would have fought Russia without any later conflict with England if it had not been for Bullitt’s urging on Roosevelt in the summer of 1939 that the Germans must be faced down about Poland
It’s well-established that Russia was intending to attack Germany and perhaps other parts or all of Western Europe in 1941, in fact it’s fairly likely Stalin had been intending to attack Germany from 1939 and possibly from as far back as the mid 1930s.
Germany became certain in the second half of 1940 that Russia was going to attack them. By the start of Germany’s Operation Barbarossa (invasion of Russia) in June 1941, Russia had trained the amazing number of 1 million paratroopers (offensive troops) and had built hundreds of forward air bases (offensive air bases) along their border with Germany, and was almost ready to invade Germany. Essentially, what happened was that Germany narrowly beat Russia to the punch.
For more details on Russia initiating the war on the Eastern Front, read this great article on this website by Laurent Guyénot – https://www.unz.com/article/barbarossa-suvorovs-revisionism-goes-mainstream/, which is a review of Sean McMeekin’s book, Stalin’s War, the book can be purchased at https://www.amazon.com/Stalins-War-New-History-World/dp/1541672798.
He said Chamberlain’s position in 1938 was that England had nothing with which to fight and that she could not risk going to war with Hitler. Kennedy’s view: That Hitler would have fought Russia without any later conflict with England if it had not been for Bullitt’s urging on Roosevelt in the summer of 1939 that the Germans must be faced down about Poland
Stalin understood that he was freeing Hitler to strike in the west by making a pact with Hitler. In effect he facilitated it. The British considered the Soviet Union to be the real problem. Stalin had already grabbed the Baltic states plus parts of Finland and Romania. The British were mobilizing against the USSR over the war with Finland even after declaring war with Germany. The British guarantee to Poland originally covered only their independence not territory; the British thought allowing Germany to take Polish land was acceptable and it would make war between Germany and the USSR quite likely (Chamberlain’s strategy was to let Hitler and Stalin into conflict). Only after the Nazi-Soviet Pact was announced was the guarantee extended to Poland’s territory because at that point the British decided war was necessary; Germany and the USSR being friendly was not acceptable as it meant Hitler was going to go West instead of East.
Clearly Stalin wanted to sit the war between the capitalists out and reap the rewards. Neville Chamberlain wanted to see the fighting done by the Germans and Bolshies, we know he thought that because he said so to a meeting of important Tories.With the the Nazi-Soviet pact the powerful Soviet deterrent to any aggression was out of the equation and the British realized the balance of power had moved against them, which was unacceptable in a way that war between the Nazis and Soviets was not. If Hitler didn’t have to worry about the Soviets at his back that suddenly made all the previous calculations obsolete.
Although Stalin may have anticipated territorial demands or military pressure such as border incidents he was astounded when Hitler subjected the USSR to an all out attack with the promethean goal of conquering the Soviet state. Everybody underestimated the effectiveness of the combination of Weimar reforms increasing centralised revenue raising for military purposes, Hitler’s decisiveness and the German army’s fighting power.
It might have had something to do with Hitler's threat to bomb Prague, if Hácha didn't give in to his blackmail.
Czechoslovakian President Emil Hácha signed a formal agreement the next day with Hitler establishing a German protectorate over Bohemia and Moravia, which constituted the Czech portion of the previous entity.
Lol. Sure, Czechs must have been thrilled at losing their independence and being occupied by a foreign power, at least some of whose representatives eventually developed extremely sinister plans for the future of Czechs (Heydrich during his time in the protectorate thought that about 50% of Czechs had to be "deported", while 50% could be Germanized, but Czech nationhood had to disappear in any case).
It soon became evident after the proclamation of the Protectorate of Bohemia-Moravia that the new regime enjoyed considerable popularity among the people living in it.
these absolutely retarded “revisionist” pieces which are little more than full-on Nazi apologetics, completely unconvincing in their arguments (the documents cited above are totally unremarkable imo and in no way show Roosevelt “instigated” WW2…it was Hitler’s decision to start a war with Poland).
These revisionist pieces are 50% kooky but offer up kernels of facts and insights that reveal aspects of the time mostly buried by the Judeo-centric media. It has elements of Nazi apologia, but keep in mind that much of US narrative is Jewish Supremacist propaganda.
Now, there is something to be learned from the Jewish Narrative as it isn’t all lies either.
If we can select the truths from the Jewish Supremacist narrative and truths from the Nazi-sympathizing narrative, we can construct a truer narrative. Of course the lies and distortions of both.
The recent events in Iraq and Syria and the whole Russia Collusion hysteria go to show that the ‘liberal’corporate media can be just as full of BS as any totalitarian press.
Of course, the difference is Putin and Assad are NOT Hitlers whereas Hitler was truly a hitler, a pathological demagogue.
Hitler is mainly to blame for WWII, and one could argue that FDR’s hostility toward Hitler was well-grounded given Hitler’s actions against Poland and then against the USSR, an ally. Also,Hitler was someone with whom diplomacy was often impossible since he regarded the compromise of others as weakness to exploit.
But it’s also true that the US, for ideological, imperial, and tribal reasons of its own, believed Germany must be toppled first before its preferred world order could prevail.
Hitler was to blame? Tell us about how blameless the Marxist "world revolution" fanatics and their Wall Street backers were. Then you can enlighten us about the Treaty of Versailles and how that played so little part in the ensuing hostilities. Long standing British imperialistic policies? No problem, eh? Zionist intrigue? Never happened, right? (Ever hear of "rabbi" Stephen Wise? G-wd's messenger on Earth, right?)
Hitler is mainly to blame for WWII, and one could argue that FDR’s hostility toward Hitler was well-grounded ...
except that it's becoming apparent even to the least amongst us, that it's not so much the totalitarian press, which in these instances seems to be 'full of BS,' as the other kind of press seems to be.
... ‘liberal’corporate media can be just as full of BS as any totalitarian press.
Sterotypes are the wisdom of the crowd. They’re usually right.
The things that are done to deal with TNB. My God, it’s so tiresome.
Reminds me of when certain shopping malls would ban all teens unless accompanied by an adult because of the dysfunctional behavior of negro teenapers. All non-negro teens had to suffer because of them. Otherwise, the negroes would scream it had disparate impact and was racist and discriminatory because only their little hell spawned demons were affected by the ban. You know, the usual B.S. they spew when held to account for their crappy behavior. As is, if a curfew is needed because of negroes, only negroes should be affected- not Whites/Asians and Hispanics.
Cage black males under thirty?
Would that help?
Yes, it would be a good idea to expose the talmud and jewish supremacy on the radio.
The problem is gaining a platform.
A good example of denying the truth was evident on Sean Hannity’s radio show.
A caller asked Hannity about the deliberate israeli attack on the USS Liberty (AGTR-5) on June 8, 1967. Hannity abruptly cut off the caller and stated: “israel is our friend and never would have done anything like that”. I damn near fell out of my chair when I heard THAT.
I lost al respect for Hannity after witnessing that…Hannity being a shill for israel.
Getting a platform is the hard part.
Best regards,
Technically, Ron Unz argued that Zionists didn’t have enough power to influence the world leaders into WWI. He is of course using a far less expansive definition of “zionist” than some people do. For example, many call the Jewish bankers who helped create the Federal Reserve “zionists”. The more rigorous definition of “zionism” as a political movement just refers to the desire to create a homeland for the jews. I hadn’t realized it, but Jacob Schiff wasn’t a zionist in the strict political sense of the term.
Nowhere did Ron deny that men like Schiff or Rothschild had enough power to sway political decision making. He just didn’t find any evidence of that in the study he did.
Zionism is a movement. Schiff and Rothschild were individual men. It’s much easier to witness or provide evidence for/against a political ideology’s impact on the decision making of governments because an ideology is necessarily on everyone’s lips so to speak.
However, individual men like Schiff and Rothschild could have hidden agendas that go beyond overt political ideologies. For example, they may have wanted the US to enter the war on the side of the allies after the Bolshevik revolution had successfully ended the Czarist regime because, absent the Czarist regime, they were more than happy to see the Kaiser go too and now considered a German loss to be the desirable outcome. This wasn’t the object of Zionism.
I brought this issue up in a comment to his latest piece that he may be too narrowly focused on Zionism but he didn’t respond. On the other hand, I didn’t bring any actual evidence to back up my speculations so there’s that…
When it all comes down to ‘do we live or die’, Chris Pool will be standing with Jews chanting ‘die Goyim die’.
Good move to walk out. “Timmy” was the one with egg on his face and he was exposed as a squirming worm.
Sub-Saharan Africa shows the problem with the idea that the current and foreseeable mixes of populations which he lump together as “humanity” have the potential to build a technologically competent global civilization which could colonize the rest of the solar system, like we see in science fiction.
Sorry, “humanity” simply lacks that potential, not when the world’s median IQ falls into the low 80’s, with downward pressure on that figure as the world fills up with useless blacks. Billions of people on this planet belong in an economy of stoop labor, at best, not in a cognitive economy based on a generous supply of quality human minds which can acquire constructive habits, benefit from studying STEM subjects and know how to solve problems like white people have done considerably better than average over our history (because in its actual usage lately, the adjective “white” has started to mean something like “competent”).
The only thing that ever stops mass migration, other than law is the hesitancy of moving to a truly alien place. In reality most immigrants aren’t bracing pioneers but droll followers who gladly stick to the paths blazed by previous cohorts of their co-ethnics who, in their new context of being a minority is a largely alien land become the focus of their lives.
I remember watching a documentary about sub-Saharan asylum seekers in Argentina and I laughed out loud when one guy left the DNC ‘to escape political persecution’ and immediately just became an immigrant and ethnic activist… Seems he forgot about whatever cause he was supposedly advocating for back home now he was safe to do so…
The guy in question appears at 2.38 but the introduction is worth listening to. If only for the line ‘it has even been said that Argentina is more racially European than immigrant-saturated Europe’. The most important graph in the world has consequences for more than just the West.
The overflow will flow into a lot of countries we traditionally don’t think as being wealthy enough to attract African asylum seekers. Also a growing number are now present in Russia. As in Poland the nucleus was foreign students but over time it’s has grown with visa overstays forming communities.
This is ultimately a form of human flood management. But there is huge hope because just like water stopping at a wall of sandbags, so too do people trying to essentially get something for nothing stop when faced with even a little bit of even a relative barrier. It’s actually practically really easy to control immigration, this is the element of the whole debate that gets overlooked rhetorically. It’s actually really easy. These immigrants are not formidable they just sense weakness. What is hard to find in the West today is merely the will.
One of the arguments immigration advocates have made for years is that the pressures driving migrants to seek better lives are so intense that there is nothing Western countries can do to stem the flow, so we should instead be looking for ways to accommodate it. Yet the flow dropped significantly after Trump was elected, before he even had a chance to do anything other than talk shit. So yes, it really is that easy -- all you have to do is look at them funny and most will stop coming. (Imagine if Trump had actually been an effective president!)Replies: @Altai
What is hard to find in the West today is merely the will.
OT. Is the UK unique in declassifying so much government stuff after 50 years? I imagine the CIA stuff is under wraps, or am I wrong?
The Information Research Department (IRD) was set up by the post-second world war Labour government to counter Soviet propaganda attacks on Britain. Its activities mirrored the CIA’s cold war propaganda operations and the extensive efforts of the USSR and its satellites.
The Observer last year revealed the IRD’s major campaign in Indonesia in 1965 that helped encourage anti-communist massacres which left hundreds of thousands dead (a link to Obama’s dad there?). There, the IRD prepared pamphlets purporting to be written by Indonesian patriots, but in fact were created by British propagandists, calling on Indonesians to eliminate the PKI, then the biggest communist party in the non-communist world.
But the thousands of declassified documents studied by Cormac give by far the most extensive insight yet into the IRD’s disinformation operations.
“The British were only one actor among many, and a fairly minor actor too, compared with the quantity of material being produced and disseminated by the bigger players,” said Cormac, professor of international relations at Nottingham University.
“The UK did not simply invent material, as the Soviets systematically did, but they definitely intended to deceive audiences in order to get the message across.”
The IRD employed 360 people at its height in the mid-60s. However, its highly secretive Special Editorial Unit, responsible for the black propaganda effort, was much smaller. From its base in a nondescript office in Westminster, the unit used a variety of tactics to manipulate opinion.
One was to produce “reports” sent to warn other governments, selected journalists and thinktanks about “Soviet subversion” or similar threats.
The reports comprised carefully selected facts and analysis often gleaned from intelligence provided by Britain’s security services, but appeared to come from ostensibly independent analysts and institutions that were in reality set up and run by the IRD.
Of course it would never happen nowadays, would it?
Of course greatly impoverishing or de-industrialising the West and the EU against the wishes of people in those regions is evil.
Of course humanity is going to use up all of our fossil fuels unless some more efficient / better source of energy comes along in the meantime, and of course doing that will not cause too many problems for us or the environment.
This thread is not about environmental issues and I don't intend to argue about them here, except to register a cry of near-desperation that so many people seem to have been tricked into conflating relatively benign elite networking clubs such as WEF with the real sources of evil on this planet.
Of course humanity is going to use up all of our fossil fuels unless some more efficient / better source of energy comes along in the meantime, and of course doing that will not cause too many problems for us or the environment.
I’m puzzled as to why so many people are still saying that the so-called “sanctions on Russia” were targeting Russia. Russian energy supplies have been vital for Europe’s prosperity for decades, as well as Russian-supplied cheap fertiliser, and various raw materials.
What happened this year was that the zionist-oligarch-run West and EU unilaterally decided to greatly reduce or eliminate their purchases of Russian energy. As all modern, developed economies rely heavily on very large supplies of energy, it was obvious to those oligarchs and many other people that those countries quickly reducing their energy supply by perhaps 20% or more (https://www.chathamhouse.org/publications/the-world-today/2022-10/putins-gas-warfare-might-galvanize-europe – Russia supplied 24% of the EU’s energy needs in 2021) would soon lead to a reduction in the size of those countries’ economies by nearly as much, perhaps 15% or more.
As expected, the EU and America have been in recession since the summer and the Bank of England said the other week that this recession would be the longest British reession since records began, i.e., it will last until the summer of 2024. This means that the policy of refusing to buy Russian energy is set in stone by those oligarchs.
The World Economic Forum (WEF), which appears to be the PR organisation for those zionist oligarchs, has been openly advocating for years for a large reduction in energy usage, especially for developed countries, and especially the countries the oligarchs control (the West and the EU). The covid lockdowns worked well in keeping Western and EU energy usage lower, known as “The Great Reset” in WEF-speak, until the much-milder Omicron variant came along at the end of 2021.
We then moved smartly along to the next stage of lower energy usage or de-industrialisation, which involves countries simply refusing to purchase enough energy to run all their existing economic activity. This was achieved by instructing the zionist-oligarch-run Ukrainian puppet-government to ethnically-cleanse the Donbas Russians starting in March, which forced the Russians to intervene militarily, and then the zionist-oligarch-controlled Western and EU media was easily able to manipulate the public into supporting the very nasty, traitorous Kiev regime and into agreeing to their zionist-run politicians turning their noses up at Russian energy.
If energy usage in the West and the EU starts to go up again to pre-2020 levels, I suspect that, sadly, we may see another US-laboratory-made pandemic, and/or there will be a big rift with China and a Western-EU-zionist refusal to trade with them, and there may be other low-energy strategies in the pipeline.
What? Wow. Any significant part of the MSM calling for the dropping of charges against Assange was nowhere near my bingo card. I read that JA’s health has suffered enormously during his confinement up to now but still, that’s great news.
(Amidst a sea of mostly destructive BS on Ukraine and the intentionally economically-self-destructive, WEF-approved sanctions on Europe and the West (not Russia!) etc., but nevermind, that JA news has made my day! 🙂 )
That was a pledge that was quickly ignored by President Bill Clinton, who intervened militarily in the former Yugoslavia before adding new NATO members from amidst the ruins of the Warsaw Pact.
Most Americans only know the propaganda that this conflict started in 2022 when an evil Putin invaded Ukraine to reestablish the Soviet empire. It really began soon after the Cold war ended when the evil American empire expanded into Eastern Europe.
I think you’re mostly building castles in the air there.
It seems beyond question to me that covid exists, though there are many lies around its origin and governments’ responses to it and so on.
Sure, most of those claims regarding the tremendous profits that American business was making during the early years of the war are certainly correct, and I also agree that the pro-British banking interests, led by JP Morgan soon began pushing very hard to get America into the war, partly so that the Allies would win and be able to repay the loans that they had taken out. That's an important theme of the Zelikow book and many other treatments of America's involvement in WWI.
Some excerpts from the chapter “Patriotism and Profit”
After reading that article and looking at the timelines, it seems very likely that the British made a firm promise in 1916 (or before) to support a country for jews in Palestine in return for powerful jews on both sides of the Atlantic getting America into the war asap, and both parties fulfilled their side of the bargain.
But the problem is that the Zionist Jews just weren't very powerful at that point, either in the US or in Britain, at least compared with people like Jacob Schiff or Paul Warburg. So I'm sure that the Zionist groups would have made that sort of offer, but why would anyone think they could deliver?
After reading that article and looking at the timelines, it seems very likely that the British made a firm promise in 1916 (or before) to support a country for jews in Palestine in return for powerful jews on both sides of the Atlantic getting America into the war asap, and both parties fulfilled their side of the bargain.
“But Hitler gambled, though revisionists say Hitler reacted to looming Soviet threat. Who knows for sure?”
I’m sure that if, as claimed, Russia had trained the amazing number of a million paratroopers (offensive only) and built hundreds of offensive, forward air bases along the border with Germany by the time Operation Barbarossa started, Russia caused Operation Barbarossa just as the western-zionist oligarchs caused the current conflict in Ukraine by ordering the Ukrainian genocide of the Donbas Russians in March, and those zionist oligarchs are also intentionally causing the current Western-European economic decline, all seemingly pre-planned long before February this year.
However, I think the underlying and biggest factor why countries like Sweden and other Western countries are falling apart, and why Eastern European countries aren’t, and still keep “with the mostly conservative values” and why “Russia seems healthier than the US and Western Europe”, I’d say you have to look at the changes in population genetics of all those peoples.
A big factor in genetic change is youth mortality (0 – 15 death rate), which before the Industrial Revolution was about 50%. Wealth and better medicine, etc. lead to lower youth mortality which means a deterioration in population genetic quality.
Poorer people have always had more children than wealthier people, but pre-Industrial Revolution the high youth mortality rate meant that wealthier people had more descendants (eugenic), post-Industrial Revolution the wealthier people had both fewer children AND fewer descendants (dysgenic), because poorer people’s children died at much higher rates than wealthier people’s. Eastern Europe and Russia have always been poorer than the West (at least for many centuries), and the Industrial Revolution started later in the East and was less effective and thus youth mortality remained higher for longer there, and this difference has persisted to the present day.
A good video on dysgenic breeding and related population genetics issues is Prof Edward Dutton’s “The Rise of Spiteful Mutants” at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kIechsT1grk.
That’s a common view – that the target of the western-zionist Ukraine war was Russians. Obviously, that’s superficially true, there’s been an eight-year civil war with the Kiev zionist-controlled regime attacking the Russians in the Donbas and Russia finally stepped in militarily in February to protect those Donbas Russians from being genocided / ethnically-cleansed in March.
But actually, I think the grand zionist strategy was always to de-industrialise/impoverish Europe and the West including America (America has been in recession since the summer). It was easily forseeable that Russia would invade Ukraine to protect the Donbas Russians if it looked like they were about to lose, and it was easily foreseeable that it would then be a piece of cake to manipulate European and Western countries into refusing to buy Russian energy thus shrinking their economies, due to strong zionist control of most EU and Western media and thus public opinion, as well as zionist oligarch control of the national political scene and politicians of most of those countries.
The World Economic Forum (WEF) seems to be the mouthpiece or PR organisation of the zionist oligarchs who run the West and the EU, and the WEF have always been clear that they want a much lower fossil fuel usage. In the last couple of years they’ve been calling their strategy “The Great Reset” but they’ve been advocating for it long before 2020. It seems the covid lockdowns were successful in achieving decreased fossil fuel usage, but then Omicron came along around December 2021 so the zionist oligarchs soon instructed Ukraine to ethnically cleanse the Donbas Russians in March, and the current spurning of Russian fuels is proving much more successful so far, with inflation rising a lot and all developed economies under zionist control shrinking fairly rapidly.
Small correction: The British blockade took place after the cease fire of WWI, to force Germany to sign the “Treaty” of Versailles.
This was not a treaty, but a diktat: Sign or starve.
[The Balfour Declaration] had nothing to do with US entry into the war.
Your denials are totally politicized, ‘Patrick McNally’. (I smell an Israeli operative in the woodpile.)
The fact that the Balfour Declaration was formerly issued after America’s entry into The Great War proves nothing of the kind. The deal was to get America into the war (on the side of GB) and, once this happens, GB would issue the much-ballyhooed, pro-Zionist Declaration (in a letter to Nathan Rothchild, no less).
Great Britain’s unauthorized giveaway of land to a third party (world Jewry) helped grease the wheels for the Nakba along with the bloody insurrection/occupation of Palestine/Syria. This human-rights catastrophe continues.
The imposition of a Jews-Only State is still reverberating. Causalities are abundant. This Zionist invasion of Palestine can be linked to virtually every Mideast calamity since 1948, including Zio-Washington’s destruction of Iraq and Libya, not to mention the ongoing destabilization campaigns against Syria, Lebanon, and Iran.
The Zionist project has cost hundreds of thousands of lives (perhaps millions) as well as trillions of US dollars. If there’s a worse investment in all of human history, I can’t think of it.
Here’s more about how World Jewry steered America into The Great War:
Excerpts from Chapter Four World War I & the Balfour Declaration:
Here’s more about how World Jewry steered America into The Great War:
You could make the effort to check non-anonymous commenters' comment history prior to throwing such allegations at them, though.
(I smell an Israeli operative in the woodpile.)
https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/2017-11-02/ty-article/.premium/britains-true-motivation-behind-the-balfour-declaration/0000017f-dc3d-d3ff-a7ff-fdbdc5ed0000
Why the British thought a vaguely worded statement would galvanize American Jewish support for World War I - and how it became the engine that led to the State of Israel
https://www.wrmea.org/1999-october-november/the-zimmermann-telegram-palestine-the-balfour-declaration-and-why-america-entered-the-great-war.html
https://www.wrmea.org/1998-september/answering-critics-of-the-theory-that-balfour-declaration-was-payoff-for-zionist-services-in-wwi.html
Following the appearance of my article “The Balfour Declaration and the Zimmermann Note” in the Aug./Sept. 1997 issue of the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs in which I put forth my theory of a trade, at the time of the First World War, with the Zionists getting Palestine and Britain getting America (as an ally—some might say a recovered colony), several readers have sent in comments, some of them critical. I believe I can answer them all, but perhaps it is better to address first the likely source of most of them.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/the-balfour-declaration-a-century-old-and-as-disputed-as-ever/
The struggle over Balfour’s legacy tells us that 100 years after a complex and often contradictory stew comprised of imperialist desires and anti-imperialist impulses, Christian Zionism and “philo-anti-Semitism,” realpolitik and idealism, converged in wartime England, a better understanding forged in open debate and served to willing listeners is still needed. With Balfour’s 100th anniversary upon us, there is no hope this will happen.
That was fake news invented by Freedman. The Balfour Declaration was issued in November 1917, long after the US had entered the war. It had nothing to do with US entry into the war. Most prominent Jews such as Jacob Schiff had been opposed to US entry until March 1917 when the Czarist government fell from power. It was the loans to the Allies made by J.P. Morgan from 1914 onward which created the incentive for US intervention. But most prominent Jews had been against that. Freedman simply made up the story about the Balfour Declaration as a motive for US entry.
Your denials are totally politicized, 'Patrick McNally'. (I smell an Israeli operative in the woodpile.)The fact that the Balfour Declaration was formerly issued after America's entry into The Great War proves nothing of the kind. The deal was to get America into the war (on the side of GB) and, once this happens, GB would issue the much-ballyhooed, pro-Zionist Declaration (in a letter to Nathan Rothchild, no less). Great Britain's unauthorized giveaway of land to a third party (world Jewry) helped grease the wheels for the Nakba along with the bloody insurrection/occupation of Palestine/Syria. This human-rights catastrophe continues. The imposition of a Jews-Only State is still reverberating. Causalities are abundant. This Zionist invasion of Palestine can be linked to virtually every Mideast calamity since 1948, including Zio-Washington's destruction of Iraq and Libya, not to mention the ongoing destabilization campaigns against Syria, Lebanon, and Iran. The Zionist project has cost hundreds of thousands of lives (perhaps millions) as well as trillions of US dollars. If there's a worse investment in all of human history, I can't think of it.Here's more about how World Jewry steered America into The Great War:https://www.amazon.com/Against-Our-Better-Judgment-History/dp/149591092XReplies: @Patrick McNally, @geokat62, @atlantis_dweller, @Anon
[The Balfour Declaration] had nothing to do with US entry into the war.
The customer Was Right!
“Most of England’s appalling troubles today are due to a bad guess: she went into the war on the wrong side in 1914. The theory of her statesmen, in those days, was that, by joining France and Russia, she would give a death-blow to a dangerous rival, Germany, and so be free to run the world. But the scheme failed to work; moreover, it had unexpected and almost fatal results. Not only did Germany come out of the mess a dangerous rival still; France also became a rival, and a very formidable one. Worse, the United States was pumped up to immense proportions, and began to challenge England’s control of the world’s markets. The results are now visible: England has three competitors instead of one, and is steadily going downhill. If she had gone into the war on the German side she’d be in a much better situation today. The Germans would be grateful for the help and willing to pay for it (while the French are not); the French would be down and out, and hence unable to menace the peace of Europe; Germany would have Russia in Europe and there would be no Bolshevik [communist] nuisance; England would have all of Siberia and Central Asia, and there would be no Japanese threat and no Indian revolt; and the United States would still be a docile British colony, as it was in 1914. . . .
The United States made a similar mistake in 1917. Our real interests at the time were on the side of the Germans, whose general attitude of mind is far more American than that of any other people. If we had gone in on their side, England would be moribund today, and the dreadful job of pulling her down, which will now take us forty or filthy years, would be over. We’d have a free hand in the Pacific, and Germany would be running the whole [European] Continent like a house of correction. In return for our connivance there she’d be glad to give us whatever we wanted elsewhere. There would be no Bolshevism [communism] in Russia and no Fascism in Italy. Our debtors would all be able to pay us. The Japs would be docile, and we’d be reorganizing Canada and probably also Australia. But we succumbed to a college professor [Wilson] who read Matthew Arnold, just as the English succumbed to a gay old dog who couldn’t bear to think of Prussian MP’s shutting down the Paris night-clubs.
As for the mistake the Russians made, I leave it to history.”
– H.L. Mencken (Baltimore Evening Sun, Nov. 11, 1931, “A Bad Guess”)
How could that have even been possible, if GB threatened Germany with war twice during two Maroccan crises before WW I, the second time in 1911, only 3 years before the war? GB always preferred war to competition.Replies: @Karl1906
If she had gone into the war on the German side she’d be in a much better situation today.
I love Menken. But with the above quote he does remind me of two other important figures of the 20th century, G.B Shaw and Bertrand Russell, in the sense that none of them could resist a funny one-liner, even at the cost of accuracy. In fact, Russell once said as much about Shaw (takes one to know one I guess).
But we succumbed to a college professor [Wilson] who read Matthew Arnold
China grows stronger all the time. These small, US-funded, astroturf ‘protests’ are not going to trouble China.
If Trump allowed a telephone call to interrupt an important meeting-in-progress (which is how the report makes it sound), you gotta ask yourself, “who is able to make such a call?”
If said phone call indeed had the power to change Trump’s demeanor toward an individual who has demonstrated more guts and public virtue than Trump ever has, you gotta ask yourself, “who is able to make such a call?”
Given the obvious answer to the question, you have to conclude that the Trumpdozer is incapable of learning.
A more relevant question would be, "Will Trump be really able to stand up for Ye and Fuentes?"Replies: @lavoisier
If said phone call indeed had the power to change Trump’s demeanor toward an individual who has demonstrated more guts and public virtue than Trump ever has, you gotta ask yourself, “who is able to make such a call?”
So, Trump can still appreciate the purity of raw nationalism, it seems. The people handling him for this 2024 run apparently can’t. That means he’s finished. The rawness won it for him in 2016. the handlers made him an ineffective president and a sorry remnant now.
Don’t be a stupid conspiracist. It had nothing to do with the Israelis!
Buildings fall down all the time when furniture catches on fire.
Well, at least, in my dreams they do.
On a side note…I couldn’t help but notice that despite the totally engulfed high rise, the structure did remain standing. Compare that to the Twin Towers and especially Building 7 that had a “furniture fire” burning on its upper floors collapsing rapidly into their own footprints after only a few hours of fire. Odd.
I got a 404 but found the report here
Yes, though the Republicans are anti-White, I think they’re objectively better in their policies in general and in their policies with regard to Whites compared to the Democrats, whose policies are often straightforwardly destructive and rabidly anti-White.
At the announcement of Zundel’s prosecution, I lost several friends and made enemies for saying that his prosecution was wrong. He wasn’t promoting violence against anyone, and the pamphlet “Did Six Million Really Die?” was a question raising documented facts countering the “official” narrative. I contacted my then Member of Parliament asking why he was being prosecuted and got the standard “rise” of Auntie Shem-itism BS, along with the actual charge “publishing False News”. I asked if that was the case, then why isn’t every newspaper editor being charged, because they constantly publish false news. No response.
I followed the trial as closely as I could, and noted that the Judge, Ronald Thomas, was extremely hostile to Doug Christie, and several in trial rulings were nothing short of bizarre, and hindered Zundel’s defense. The fact that the “official” narrative was also the Government narrative, in my opinion, was what swayed the (naive) jury. I noted, to anyone that would listen, that it was ironic the Supreme Court’s ruling, saying Zundel’s views were covered by the Constitutional right to free expression, were just about the time that plaques were changed at Auschwitz lowering the number of “victims” by some 2.5 million.
Fast forward to the announcement of Monica Schaefer’s arrest. I contacted the moron collecting a paycheque for posing as my MP, and asked why his party was silent on her arrest, when Germany, under its obligations to the UN Charter, was in breach of its (UN) freedom of expression provisions. Deja vu – the standard “rise” of Auntie Shem-itism BS repeated as if reading (copying) from a (((script))). This past February, when the shabbos goy from Saskatoon, Kevin Waugh, seconded by the MP from “the most Jewish riding in Canada” https://thecjn.ca/news/thornhill-election-2021/ introduced hi “Private Member’s Bill to make Hollow-co$t denial illegal, (nanimously passing first reading), I again contacted the dullard posing as my MP, asking among other things, if he, and his (woke) party understood that the Supreme Court had already ruled on that in the Zundel decision(s). He has refused to answer.
Former MP and Trudeau v2.0 mentor Irwin Cotler https://mediamonitors.net/irwin-cotler-is-too-israeli-to-be-in-canadas-government/ was declared, in an Israeli poll, popular enough to be President of Israel. The Con-job-servatives and New Dumbshit Party are both on board with our (((occupation))). We’re effed.
“…a court of law, with its rigorous rules for evidence, would decide the factual basis of the Holocaust claim…”
This was, in fact, done during the Zundel trials in Toronto during the 1980’s.
All witnesses, testimony, and evidence proffed by the prosecution were completely demolished by the defence attorney Doug Christy.
And yet, the jury still ruled Zundel guilty as charged!
Not until the appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada was this ruling overturned.
Zundel had been charged with “spreading false news” when he published a booklet entitled “Did 6 million really die?” A Jewish Torontonian took umbrage at this expression of free speech and got the crown attorney to charge Zundel.
The transcripts make fascinating reading as to what constitutes “evidence” for a deed.
Attorney Doug Christy was brilliant in defence and cross examination of the crown’s witnesses. He was a real defender of free speech in Canada.
Ideally, a court of law, with its rigorous rules for evidence, would decide the factual basis of the Holocaust claim. But, this never happened. We saw the complete breakdown of this objective process during the Nuremberg trials.
Of the 485 tons of confiscated German documents sitting in our National Archives, not a single document describes a Holocaust plan, even though the Germans meticulously documented every detail of their military campaigns. The prosecution sought and obtained very relaxed rules of evidence and criminal procedures to win their convictions, because they couldn’t win the cases with proper legal procedures. The German prisoners suffered severe physical symptoms of torture, but many of them said the psychological torture was worse– mock executions and threats to deport their families to the Soviet Union, where they would have met certain death. A legal team that has a winning case doesn’t need to resort to loosening criminal procedures, eliminating rules of evidence, falsifying evidence, and threatening and torturing witnesses. It rightly impugns their case. The U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Harlan Stone, said of the Nuremberg Trials: “Chief Prosecutor Jackson is away conducting his high-grade lynching party in Nuremberg. I don’t mind what he does to the Nazis, but I hate to see the pretense that he is running a court and proceeding according to common law. This is a little too sanctimonious a fraud to meet my old-fashioned ideas.” The hypotheses that the Germans conducted a Holocaust was never proven with proper legal arguments.
Why were the Allies unable to prove their arguments through proper legal procedures? Because their arguments were likely flawed. If their reasoning was flawed in the Nuremberg trials, their reasoning was likely flawed in their political views of events that led to WW2. Americans were deceived by patriotism into adopting a biased perspective, instead of a properly reasoned perspective. Today, some 80 years after WW2, that war propaganda still prevails, with threats to imprison academic historians if they dare to challenge it. Germany needs to use prison threats, because they know their logic will not prevail under the scrutiny of science of logic.
If any people have a reason to hate whites, it’s the American Indians. But, I get the impression that they hate whites less than Jewish Supremacists do.
If there us any group that whites would owe anything to at this point, it would be the American Indians. Really, that would be everyone who lives in America. Since everyone comes here to profit, nobody gets to play the stolen land game against whites. Blacks claiming that America owes them a thing is laughable at this point. Jews have been treated extremely well in America, and their complaints and subversion is nothing more than a giant stab in the back to whites.
If any people have a reason to hate whites, it’s the American Indians. But, I get the impression that they hate whites less than Jewish Supremacists do.
Can Russia sink any lower on the scale of humanity? What a despicable race of people!
————
Russia Traffics in Ukrainian Children
Nov. 23, 2022
By Nicholas Kristof
BALAKLIYA, Ukraine — The children left this town in August for a free summer camp sponsored by the Russian occupiers, enticed by assurances of gifts and of safety from constant shelling.
“The Russians promised it would be two or three weeks, and then the children would be back,” Nadia Borysenko, 29, told me. Her 12-year-old daughter, Daria, was among 25 children from this town in northeastern Ukraine who boarded a bus to the camp.
Russia did not return them, however. Daria and other children are now across the border in Russia, and Moscow is making it very difficult for families to recover their children.
The youngsters here are among many thousands of Ukrainian children whom Russia has taken from Ukraine and in some cases put up for adoption.
The Ukrainian government count is 11,461 children known by name and taken without families to Russia or Russian-controlled areas. President Volodymyr Zelensky told the G20 summit that there are “tens of thousands” more who are known about only indirectly or with less detail.
…
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/23/opinion/russia-ukraine-children.html
A commenter on TUR who believes in Reuters propaganda? You must be jewish and/or a bot.
Because propaganda is one of the most subtle, insidious and powerful things in the Universe. While at the same time appearing completely innocuous. Think of the power of propaganda. If someone gives you a bar of chocolate, and you eat it, you know you have eaten chocolate. If they give you a slice of apple pie and you consume it you know you have consumed apple pie. But if someone hands you propaganda you aren't even aware that you have consumed it. And in time someone else's opinion becomes your own. It is especially effective the younger you are. If someone asks you to express an opinion on a subject you know little about, instead of admitting ignorance on the subject, you are apt to regurgitate something you were told on tv or the internet. And so, without even realizing it, you parrot what you have been taught and someone else's opinions become your own. And you don't even realize it! Most people have little or no ability to think for themselves. Propaganda fills that void nicely. And people can be taught to believe literally anything. That is the beauty and the horror of propaganda.SuluReplies: @AlexanderEngUK
why is it that increasing numbers of White Westerners are so woke and stupid as to believe things like men can be women or all races are equal?
That was a pretty good description of propaganda, thanks. I think you went a little too far, in that I don’t think you can get even low/no-information people, which is most people, to believe “literally anything”, but yes, propaganda is very powerful and can distort and replace reality to a large extent with most people. I also agree younger people are more vulnerable to propaganda.
Having said that, I think there are always limits to what you can do with propaganda. Could you get American majority support for the idea that the Republican Party are so evil they must be banned, the Constitution replaced, and a one-party State installed? I think a significant minority of Democrats would like that, but I don’t think any amount of propaganda would get most Americans to agree. Will that be true in 50 years from now? Maybe. 100 years? Maybe not. That’s why I said I cannot blame the propaganda for everything, it’s inaccurate to think propaganda is the only important thing – the constant, underlying changes in average population genetics shift everything all the time much faster than most people think, the window of possibilities is always moving.
You don’t seem to understand that
A) Russian public opinion will not tolerate holding off until March when 380,000 reservists have already been called up, some of whom are fighting already. They want this over as quickly as possible.
B) The Russians are only interested in incorporating those parts of eastern and southern Ukraine which have a majority ethnic Russian population. They are not interested in the rest, so will not be taking care of them.
C) Holding off for another 4 months allows NATO, the EU and the West generally to engage in more of their hostile activities in the interim.
D) Ethnic Ukrainians are not interested – or will be permitted – in fleeing to Russia. They are already fleeing to EU countries, and will continue to do so, regardless of when the offensive is initiated.
One man’s being realistic is another man’s blackpilling.
For example, I think I’m being realistic when I say that the average genetic/genotypic IQs of Western White populations have gone down by more than 10 points since the mid 1800s, and are declining at perhaps 1 point per decade nowadays (probably most or all other groups also have declining genetic IQs too).
I think I’m being realistic because I’ve seen good scientific evidence for this, e.g. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4404736/, and I’ve seen The Jolly Heretic’s videos for explanations as to why it’s happening, e.g., https://rudd-o.com/archives/societal-decline-explained-by-the-rise-of-spiteful-mutants. I think it’s realistic to conclude that without a resumption of eugenic trends which we used to have until around perhaps the early 1800s, more or less all is lost regardless of other important issues.
However, you will probably think I’m blackpilling because you haven’t seen the evidence for genetic IQ decline and don’t know about it, maybe you don’t care to know. You might counter that IQ scores have been rising for many decades, but I could point out that even IQ scores (expressed IQ / phenotypic IQ) in Western White populations have mostly been stagnant or slightly falling since the 1990s, and anyway, why is it that increasing numbers of White Westerners are so woke and stupid as to believe things like men can be women or all races are equal?
A century or two ago almost none of our ancestors believed idiocies like that and nothing would’ve induced them to. I cannot blame everything on the lying, zionist media and woke indoctrination in universities and so on.
Because propaganda is one of the most subtle, insidious and powerful things in the Universe. While at the same time appearing completely innocuous. Think of the power of propaganda. If someone gives you a bar of chocolate, and you eat it, you know you have eaten chocolate. If they give you a slice of apple pie and you consume it you know you have consumed apple pie. But if someone hands you propaganda you aren't even aware that you have consumed it. And in time someone else's opinion becomes your own. It is especially effective the younger you are. If someone asks you to express an opinion on a subject you know little about, instead of admitting ignorance on the subject, you are apt to regurgitate something you were told on tv or the internet. And so, without even realizing it, you parrot what you have been taught and someone else's opinions become your own. And you don't even realize it! Most people have little or no ability to think for themselves. Propaganda fills that void nicely. And people can be taught to believe literally anything. That is the beauty and the horror of propaganda.SuluReplies: @AlexanderEngUK
why is it that increasing numbers of White Westerners are so woke and stupid as to believe things like men can be women or all races are equal?
Will the people bring intelligent, quality discourse to Twitter, or will they be blaming the Jew?
If it is anything like this blog... it will be the latter.Replies: @Thomasina, @RestiveUs
Will the people bring intelligent, quality discourse to Twitter, or will they be blaming the Jew?
that depends on what you mean by "the Jew".If you mean the handful of people who claim all Jews are demonic and guilty, then I hope not.But is Kanye right to say Jews control Hollywood and the entertainment industry, and use that power to crush any criticism of how they run it? Is it correct that the post 9/11 wars in the Middle East have been orchestrated by Jewish neocons, to destroy any government that Israel considers inconvenient to its continued hegemony and persecution (and murder) of the Palestinians? Was it Jews in the Obama State Dept. like Victoria Nuland who perpetrated a violent coup in Ukraine, and have been using their quislings ever since to foment war with Russia? Is there any connection to our continued illegal occupation of Syrian territory, other than Jewish influence on our foreign policy? These are the questions that are generally verboten to be discussed on the controlled media and social networks online. Should it remain a forbidden subject,- the consolidated Zionist / Jewish control of the Senate, the media, the Fed and the U.S. Treasury? Among other things..Are asking such questions, 'hate speech', that in your opinion should be banned?Replies: @Anon
intelligent, quality discourse to Twitter, or will they be blaming the Jew?
For......braying about being the bestest volk in the world EVAH;...claiming to be the sufferingest tribe on Earth;...crying out in pain while shivving others;...committing endless, sundry crimes;...abusing media/banking power;...murdering Palestinians;...killing US sailors and citizens; ...censoring goyim online and off;...forbidding boycotts of Israel;
will they be blaming the Jew?
As if anyone terrified of criticism is even interested intelligent discourse. Of course, if they have the power to effectuate their insane demand to be placed above criticism, they soon become incapable of intelligent discourse. At that point they're reduced to online trolling.
Will the people bring intelligent, quality discourse to Twitter, or will they be blaming the Jew?
When did those things become mutually exclusive.
Will the people bring intelligent, quality discourse to Twitter, or will they be blaming the Jew?
David Duke, indeed! Ha! ha-haw-ha!
Useless Republicans like Pat Buchanan helped ruin America. Was it 1992 or 1996 that Pat picked a Black woman to run with him as his VP candidate? People like Buchanan and Trump also publicly mocked David Duke in his run for POTUS. Buchanan nor Trump are in no way, shape or form, the man that Duke has proven himself to be. If we lived in a healthy nation it would be men like Buchanan and Trump who would have little chance of beating David Duke instead of the other way around. Duke was exposing Jewish power and talking about the southern border as a very young man in the 1970s.
a new epoch of honesty is trying
I am old, and observed an OLD epoch of attempted honesty, when Philip Roth presented the weaknesses and strengths of Jewish character. Roth understood, and depicted, the Jewish character better than anyone then or since. He met fierce resistance, a good example of which occurred when Wikipedia asserted that Roth could not be a credible source of information regarding his own writings. Ye of course is not as articulate as Roth, but then again, Ye possesses resources Roth lacked.
As much as I would love to agree that things are changing for the better, I have my doubts.
Henry Ford spoke out.
Charles Lindbergh spoke out.
Helen Thomas spoke out.
Marlon Brando spoke out.
Mel Gibson spoke out.
Traficant. McKinney. Ron Paul, etc.
Every so often some VIP mentions jewish influence, and they usually apologize, and the incident is forgotten.
Until there are more significant numbers of people that become aware of the JQ and take a stand to oppose jewish supremacy, nothing is going to happen.
And it will have to go beyond just The Noticing. Action has to be taken as far as removing jews from positions of control over gentiles.
In this Duran conversation, Robert Barnes commented that Tim Ryan, who represented Traficant's district, did not even win the vote in blue-collar Youngstown-Mahoning Valley OH. GOP J D Vance won the Ohio senate seat..https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBDGjQHbWGQAfter a lackluster then abandoned presidential run in 2019, when Ryan entered the race for Ohio senator, signs suggested Ryan capitulated to Jewish preferences.BUT IT DIDN'T WORK!
Traficant. McKinney. Ron Paul, etc.
Jewish power is deeply entrenched in America and the world (for the most part), however, I hold on to hope, hope that we may see an actual change.
I’d love to share your enthusiasm, but I’m not optimistic. You ever try to reason with a jew? You’ll lose. No matter what you say, they’ll disagree with.
Their learned men spend hours every day poring over arcane texts, while almost always getting government subsidies for food, housing, clothes, to allow them to continue engaging in their tortuous philosophical pursuits.
Other jews wake up in the morning and immediately start running business scams in their head (Milkin, Madoff, Bankman-Fried, pretty much everybody on Wall Street).
And still other jews construct elaborate community organizing flowcharts so diabolically inscrutable that no regulator or inspector can ever truly ascertain where the funding’s coming for Antifa or BLM or 5000 other cultural termite infestations.
Everything is three times more complicated in Jew World, but they like it that way. They wear angst like a warm sweater.
The only solution to eradicate jews from our culture involves a New Hitler who’s not afraid to break a few eggs along the way. Political and philosophical solutions will fail.
The Ye and Kyrie sagas are an interesting example of a momentous shift in the zeitgeist. I sense a new epoch of honesty is trying to raise its long-submerged head.
I am old, and observed an OLD epoch of attempted honesty, when Philip Roth presented the weaknesses and strengths of Jewish character. Roth understood, and depicted, the Jewish character better than anyone then or since. He met fierce resistance, a good example of which occurred when Wikipedia asserted that Roth could not be a credible source of information regarding his own writings. Ye of course is not as articulate as Roth, but then again, Ye possesses resources Roth lacked.Replies: @Fidelios Automata
a new epoch of honesty is trying
Agree with that. 2022 isn't 1967. I'm fully expecting the Jewish Empire to fall apart. The whole thing is too corrupt and too dysfunctional. The public is losing out economically and the social failure and inequality is obvious. Also the pointless wars and government lies, deindustrialization, 9/11, Israel First nonsense, Covid "vaccines", FED currency debasement etc. etc.Replies: @cranc, @TheGreatGodNaturalRights
The Ye and Kyrie sagas are an interesting example of a momentous shift in the zeitgeist. I sense a new epoch of honesty is trying to raise its long-submerged head.
How are the rich breeding us like cattle? In most Western countries the native population is declining and up only from immigrant invaders. If anything the rich are erasing and replacing Western populations. As far as being too poor to breed tell that to sub-Saharan Africa. The birth rate sub-Saharan Africa is quite high. Also there are some extremely poor countries that manage to deliberately reduce their populations like Bangladesh.
Regarding your no. 2., I mostly agree but I’d say pretty much all the claims of suppressed knowledge are mostly unfounded.
One thing I’ve never agreed with is that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Why not just apply the same standards of evidence to all claims or theories? In general, the more wrong a claim is, the less evidence it has, so that dynamic tends to naturally weed out the false claims/theories on its own.
The most likely theory I know of that may lead to very-low-cost energy (and interstellar travel) is Quantised Inertia (QI), Dr Mike McCulloch’s theory. There’s lots of evidence for QI. Mike’s Twitter is https://twitter.com/memcculloch, his blog is https://physicsfromtheedge.blogspot.com/.
Tl;dr: Free energy tech most probably doesn’t exist, but Dr Mike McCulloch’s recent theory, Quantised Inertia (QI), implies very-low-cost energy and interstellar travel are possible. DARPA has funded him to the tune of $1.3 million, results are promising.
I looked into free energy / ZPE maybe a decade ago, and strongly concluded that it didn’t exist, although I noted that there have been anomalous results in this kind of field for a century or so, e.g., the Podkletnov gravity shielding effects of the 1990s.
A few years ago, I came across Dr Mike McCulloch, of Plymouth University, England. His theory of Quantised Inertia (QI) implies the possibility of very low cost energy from the vacuum / quantum flux, and crucially, this is the only theory I’ve ever seen in this kind of field that is backed up by solid, published/checkable maths, (and Mike has published 26 papers in reputable journals on various, related subjects, though most of his QI papers over the last decade or so have been rejected).
Mike was awarded $1.3 million in DARPA funding, which he’s almost finished using to demonstrate QI in the laboratory, with promising results and a forthcoming paper according to his Twitter feed.
I’m not a mathematician or physicist, but I’d say the central insight of QI is that gravity is not a pull between physical objects as the name implies, instead, gravity is a push on physical objects from the vacuum / quantum field / ZPF. This push is manipulable.
QI correctly predicts the bending of light around the sun, all the motions of our solar system, and, importantly, the orbits of wide binary star systems and galaxies without resorting to dark matter/energy, which no other theory does without inserting arbitrary parameters. All these predictions are in published papers.
QI explains things like sonoluminescence and inertia. QI also predicts that very low cost energy is possible on Earth as I mentioned above, and that using QI theory we can build propellant-free spacecraft that can reach a significant fraction of the speed of light thus making interstellar travel practicable.
If you found any of this interesting, you can follow Mike on Twitter here https://twitter.com/memcculloch, and read his blog here https://physicsfromtheedge.blogspot.com/. Here’s a short TEDx talk by Mike at Plymouth University on what QI is and how it works: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnNKC82wUmY.
Your comment would make some sort of sense if Ukraine were winning, but it isn’t, it’s losing badly against the good guys in this conflict, Russia.
Chappelle trod the line between cancellation on one side and truth and backing up his friend, Ye, very well in that SNL sketch, which I thought was genuinely funny. I think Chappelle’s support for Ye was confirmed by the hostile response to Chappelle’s monologue from the ADL and other jew supremacists/apologists.
E.g. Chappelle said something like “It’s not crazy to think that jews control the media, but it’s certainly a crazy thing to say” and at the end “I hope they don’t take anything away from me [because of what I’ve said]…. whoever they are!” with a big smile. For me, Chappelle’s clearly agreeing with Ye, and Chappelle’s a comedian so he did it in a funny and roundabout way.
>Almost none of his fellow black celebrities rallied to [West’s] side, or if they did, I didn’t hear about it.
Dave Chapelle did. Apparently he left the spicier parts of this monologue out when running it by SNL’s producers. He really did a perfect job of supporting West here without stepping over the line into cancel territory himself. There was some impotent whining from ADL’s Greenblatt but the appetite for going after yet another black celebrity (after West and Irving) seems to have dissipated:
Twitter is/was Deep State’s most powerful propaganda tool.
Musk has now interfered with Deep State’s largest psyops program.
Musk is now Deep State’s enemy number one.
Note to Elon: don’t try to seek refuge in the Ecuadorian Embassy/Consulate.
Who will be the first to break the story about FTX being a conduit for Western intelligence agencies funneling black budget money to Ukraine and [other entities] to regime change Russia?? 🤔
Twitter is/was Deep State’s most powerful propaganda tool.
Musk has now interfered with Deep State’s largest psyops program.
Here’s a lengthy comment I left a few years ago on my view of the dynamics of political/media conflicts. I’d originally been thinking of including it in the body of my piece since it was somewhat relevant to the situation regarding the ADL, but finally decided it was too long and extraneous:
Well, as someone who’s actually been involved in quite a number of major political campaigns, several of them successful, let me contribute my own perspective…
First, media totally dominates our political world, so much so that there’s no other factor of even remotely comparable importance. Aside from the desire of campaign consultants to get rich, the only reason politicians raise money is to buy media, mostly paid (i.e. ads) but also free (i.e. campaign consultants who can effectively spin reporters and shape the coverage).
Personally, I think the best metaphor I’ve ever encountered for understanding the role of media in politics is found in the Warlock stories of Larry Niven, the noted SF writer. In his framework, mana is the raw power source behind magic, the resource necessary to produce desired effects, much like hydrocarbons that power our industrial civilization. Basically, media is the mana of political campaigns.
So the two, somewhat independent, needs of a political campaign are to acquire sufficient mana and then to shape it effectively. Elected officials, celebrities, and those with connections to major media organs tend to have automatic access to reasonable supplies of mana, but their effectiveness at using it can vary dramatically. Also, in the case of elected officials, they may be used to controlling the mana in their local area, but are often unprepared for the situation elsewhere, where their usual sources of power do not apply.
Candidates who do not start with such a powerful, pre-existing base are faced with drawing sufficient mana for their campaigns to even come into being. If the media doesn’t cover you, then you don’t exist, and your 2% in the national polls would be comparable to that of a fictitious individual provided as a placebo (non-existent individuals with invented names sometimes get 5% or higher support in political polls).
So, how to get mana? Well, one less pleasant way, is to do or say sufficiently outrageous or controversial things that the media covers you. For example, a few weeks ago some unknown individual with no funding paid $200 to file a California ballot initiative mandating the death penalty for all homosexuals, calling it “The Sodomite Suppression Act” or something like that. Normally, random ballot initiatives get zero coverage, but he got lots of ink and maybe some electronic coverage, probably millions of dollars worth of free mana. The problem with this approach is that the mana comes in the form of a massively destructive blast from all directions, which probably doesn’t help you actually get elected. Over the years, various rightwing Republican candidates for president have knowingly or unknowing followed this sort of approach to cope with their lack of funding, without a history of much success. To some extent, the proposed positions of the hypothetical “Fred” represent an attenuated version of this strategy.
Now getting hit by a blast of pure mana isn’t a great recipe for winning a campaign, but it beats having no access to any mana at all, which is the fate of an unknown candidate whose positions are bland or mainstream. And the crucial possibility is that a sufficiently skilled political sorcerer may be able to divert and capture at least a portion of the mana in that blast, reshaping it to power his own defenses and perhaps even a counterattack. This is not easy—indeed it’s *exceptionally* difficult—but pretty much the only option under the circumstances. Thus, suffering a massive, one-sided attack may provide the only slight chance of winning.
If the Opposition largely controls the sources of mana, namely the media, they may realize this, and deliberately avoid providing any visibility to the “dangerous ideas” of their opponent, following the classic “blackout strategy.” Notably, the MSM and the Republicans used this approach quite effectively against the Ron Paul campaign in 2008. (And if your response isn’t sufficiently disciplined, they can shape any slight carelessness into a crushing disaster, as was used against the Howard Dean campaign in 2004.)
One counter-move is to try to take advantage of any ill-discipline among your massively mana-rich opponents. For example, if they’ve decided upon a classic “blackout strategy” but you can provoke a few of them into foolish attacks, that not only provides you some necessary resources, but the chance for easy early victories if their smarter and more powerful elements stick with the blackout.
And the ideal situation is to take positions that *seem* crazy and very vulnerable, thereby drawing the shock and the attacks, but which are actually much stronger and more defensible than realized. Once again, this is *not* easy to pull off.
In political campaigns my own preferred approach has always been a combination of strategic offense and tactical defense, namely trying to quickly occupy a position astride the Opposition lines of supply and communications, thereby almost forcing them to attack lest they risk the entire collapse of their front.
https://www.unz.com/article/the-left-has-already-won-the-2016-election/#comment-987039
Little wonder that the Russians have finally worked out that the West's political class are недоговороспособны - 'non-agreement-capable'. The world's brown folks would use a different word in Russian: пизду (rhymes with 'runts').
... it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine...
There is no doubt that like 9-11, the official Kennedy assassination story is false. Kennedy was better than most Presidents, but no saint. For example, he began the plot that destroyed democracy in Brazil for two decades.
Can’t we get a “hasbara” button?
His hand barely shook when he took that picture. What a sight. I’ve always found the Zapruder film to be suspicious. You can see the right parietal part of Kennedy’s head blown away, but doctors at Parkland mentioned a massive deficit at the back of his head. The possibility exists that his head further disintegrated on the ride to Parkland, and then as he was hurriedly rushed into Trauma Room 1. But I always found a disconnect between what you see in the film, and how his wounds were described later. We’ll probably never know the truth.
The assassination of Oswald is itself the smoking gun. You know when the smoking gun is a smoking gun held by a jewish gun runner, you’ve also got a guy randomly filming the event who happens to be Jewish too.
“Abraham Zapruder (May 15, 1905 – August 30, 1970) was a Ukrainian-born American clothing manufacturer who witnessed the assassination of United States President John F. Kennedy in Dallas, Texas, on November 22, 1963. He unexpectedly captured the shooting in a home movie while filming the presidential limousine and motorcade as it traveled through Dealey Plaza. The Zapruder film is regarded as the most complete footage of the assassination.”
and Ukrainian!
Faber, I’m shilling for the Kike State because I impugn their capacity to control a vastly larger nuclear power?
The Zionazis were in no position to order CIA around or murder their head of state. At the time of the apical coup Israel’s existence depended on US protection. Israel was and is a one-nuke laydown, a sniveling pariah state with no strategic depth or defense industrial base. CIA could swat it like a fly. At any time CIA could cut off Izzies’ aid and their illegally proliferated nukes and RD, instead of lying to conceal the ratline, as Kline did.
When you watch that girl get chopped in half in Jaws, do you go, “Eek, a remora!” If you are cognizant of the actual, serious research on this apical coup, you know its execution required complete, precise control of all levels of the US government. Izzies did not have that. CIA did and does, in law, regulation, judicial precedent, organization, repressive capacity, and impunity.
We know how CIA killed Kennedy. Douglass, Salandria are your primers. Some tenuously-employed academic makes up a story with furious handwaving and pictures of LBJ, that’s just catchphrases for morons to parrot. Guyenot never goes near the probative evidence, he just argues in a vacuum from some unspecified and ineffable Jewy mind-control superpower. It’s CIA hack work, same shit over and over.
The CIA is Israel's branch office in America, for Pete's sake. Where you been?
The Zionazis were in no position to order CIA around or murder their head of state.
I agree but you are up against a formidable group of Jew-haters, they are not formidable in intelligence...but in numbers. In fact, they are so over the top it leads one to believe there is an ulterior motive.Replies: @annamaria, @RedpilledAF
The Zionazis were in no position to order CIA around or murder their head of state. At the time of the apical coup Israel’s existence depended on US protection. Israel was and is a one-nuke laydown, a sniveling pariah state with no strategic depth or defense industrial base. CIA could swat it like a fly. At any time CIA could cut off Izzies’ aid and their illegally proliferated nukes and RD, instead of lying to conceal the ratline, as Kline did.
Sounds like Hasbara. First comment, anonymous, and no argument. Just snark.
Even taking your comment at face value, you don’t think the “Jew State” had any influence on the CIA?
Here we go again. It wasn’t CIA it was the Jew State. In other news, Squeaky masterminded Helter Skelter and Ravil Mingazov did 911.
It is for sure there is a cabal of rabid Jew Haters on this blog, or perhaps they are troll plants. Their narrative is always the Jews did it.
Here we go again. It wasn’t CIA it was the Jew State. In other news, Squeaky masterminded Helter Skelter and Ravil Mingazov did 911.
The “US” has been busy degrading its most precious asset, its people, for decades now. Perhaps even over a century. The US has been busy degrading its second most precious asset, its middle class, for decades now. The US has been busy degrading its third most precious asset, its dynamic and productive small businesses, for decades now. The US has been busy degrading its entire culture and civilization by the massive and deliberate policy of replacement of high IQ and highly educated people by low IQ and low education POC from across the entire planet.
The entire globohomo movement and the march to trannystan has not only degraded the morals of the people, but also the food stock for the US military. The corrupt “US” MIC can no longer produce effective weapons systems in volume nor can it find high quality soldiers required to operate them.
In light of these simple facts, the assertion that the “US” is trying to maintain is hegemony of power long term is absurd.
All this war mongering, trade wars and sanction wars are about other goals of a small transnational cabal pulling strings across the planet:
– The continued preeminence of the US dollar and its use as the primary tool for Judaic
plundering of the entire planet through their usual practice of usury.
– The mad march towards androgeny and transhumanism
– The control of all energy and other resource production across the planet by a small cabal of satanic elites
– The mass culling of humanity and elimination of all threats to this small cabal
Russia, Iran and China appear to be unwilling to submit to this cabal and its goals or to pledge fealty to it. The Judaic cabal has one choice: either force Putin and Xi to submit or to give up on everything they have worked for centuries for. Clearly the cabal is willing to take the planet to the brink of nuclear war, and over it, in order to have its way.
Treated the local service staff like garbage
Actually the Imperial British in general treated their “service staff” with far more care and humanity than how the native kings & local elites of the “service staff” had treated them, prior to the Empire and in many cases after the Empire.
For example I have before you the writing of Michael Francis O’Dwyer GCIE KCSI was a British Imperial officer and later the Lieutenant Governor of Punjab, British India, between 1913 and 1919.
From his book
India as I knew it 1885-1925 by Michael O’Dwyer
https://archive.org/download/in.gov.ignca.13879/13879.pdf
“A large part of the population were Bhil aborigines, a primitive and simple race, still semi-nomadic. They are great hunters, their favourite weapon being the bow and arrow, with which they will attack a tiger or a panther. ”
…snip…
“We had a Bhil Corps at Ladore active, hardy, cheery little men, reminding one of the Gurkhas; and, like the latter, most devoted to their few British officers. In fact the British officer, civil or military, is seen at his best in dealing with these primitive races. The high caste Indian and the Intelligentsia have a lofty contempt for the Bhil. But the British officer takes a paternal interest in these unsophisticated children of nature, learns their language and their ways, tries to wean them from their vices of theft and drink, admires their courage, joins them in the chase; while they on their part give him, for he too is frank, courageous, fond of sport, their affection and devotion. One trembles to think how they and other aboriginal races will fare when India enjoys the blessings of full Swaraj. They will be regarded, and perhaps treated, in the way the Spartans treated the Helots. This is well expressed in the classic description of the Bhils by a Bengali Babu; “ The Bhil is a black man, but more hairy. When he meets you in his jungle, he shoots you in the back with an arrow, and throws your body into the ditch. Thus you may know the Bhil.””
Also from here
https://www.victoriainstitutions.com/shrouded/29
CHAPTER TWENTY NINE
British colonialism versus American hegemony
“American hegemony is basically based on firepower and technical skills. There is not much of what one can call a touch of emotional content of the local native people in the far-off nations standing with the American interests. If America goes weak, then they are as good as lost. However, in the case of the British Empire, it would be seen almost all over colonial history that the British side always fought from a weaker, numerically insignificant position. Yet, so much was the emotional fidelity that they received from their local supporters that they managed to outlive the sieges and the initial losses, to come out victorious. To get a small example of this emotional loyalty, one has to read how Robert Clive was given so much emotional support by his Tamil soldiery when they under siege for more than six months. The soldiers informed him that they would forego eating the rice and subsist on the water (kanjivellam) that was usually thrown off after rice is boiled. Food stock had depleted to such levels. Robert Clive came out in flying colours. ”