[go: up one dir, main page]

The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Alastair Crooke Anatoly Karlin Andrew Anglin Andrew Joyce Audacious Epigone Boyd D. Cathey C.J. Hopkins E. Michael Jones Eric Margolis Eric Striker Fred Reed Gilad Atzmon Godfree Roberts Gregory Hood Guillaume Durocher Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Thompson Jared Taylor John Derbyshire Jonathan Cook Jung-Freud Karlin Community Kevin Barrett Kevin MacDonald Lance Welton Larry Romanoff Laurent Guyénot Linh Dinh Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Kersey Pepe Escobar Peter Frost Philip Giraldi Razib Khan Ron Unz Steve Sailer The Saker Tobias Langdon Trevor Lynch A. Graham A. J. Smuskiewicz A Southerner Academic Research Group UK Staff Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Agha Hussain Ahmad Al Khaled Ahmet Öncü Alain De Benoist Alan Macleod Albemarle Man Alex Graham Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alexander Jacob Alexander Wolfheze Alfred McCoy Alison Weir Allan Wall Allegra Harpootlian Amalric De Droevig Ambrose Kane Amr Abozeid Anand Gopal Anastasia Katz Andre Damon Andre Vltchek Andreas Canetti Andrei Martyanov Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andrew Hamilton Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Napolitano Andrew S. Fischer Andy Kroll Angie Saxon Ann Jones Anna Tolstoyevskaya Anne Wilson Smith Anonymous Anonymous American Anonymous Attorney Anonymous Occidental Anthony Boehm Anthony Bryan Anthony DiMaggio Tony Hall Antiwar Staff Antonius Aquinas Antony C. Black Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor AudaciousEpigone Augustin Goland Austen Layard Ava Muhammad Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Kissin Barry Lando Barton Cockey Beau Albrecht Belle Chesler Ben Fountain Ben Freeman Ben Sullivan Benjamin Villaroel Bernard M. Smith Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Blake Archer Williams Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Book Brad Griffin Bradley Moore Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brett Wilkins Brian Dew Brian McGlinchey Brian R. Wright Brittany Smith C.D. Corax Cara Marianna Carl Boggs Carl Horowitz Carolyn Yeager Cat McGuire Catherine Crump César Keller Chalmers Johnson Chanda Chisala Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlie O'Neill Charlottesville Survivor Chase Madar Chauke Stephan Filho Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Chris Woltermann Christian Appy Christophe Dolbeau Christopher DeGroot Christopher Donovan Christopher Ketcham Chuck Spinney Civus Non Nequissimus CODOH Editors Coleen Rowley Colin Liddell Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Cynthia Chung D.F. Mulder Dahr Jamail Dakota Witness Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel Barge Daniel McAdams Daniel Vinyard Danny Sjursen Dave Chambers Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Boyajian David Bromwich David Chibo David Chu David Gordon David Haggith David Irving David L. McNaron David Lorimer David Martin David North David Stockman David Vine David Walsh David William Pear David Yorkshire Dean Baker Declan Hayes Dennis Dale Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Diego Ramos Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Dmitriy Kalyagin Donald Thoresen Alan Sabrosky Dr. Ejaz Akram Dr. Ridgely Abdul Mu’min Muhammad Dries Van Langenhove Eamonn Fingleton Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Edward Curtin Edward Dutton Egbert Dijkstra Egor Kholmogorov Ekaterina Blinova Ellen Brown Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Emil Kirkegaard Emilio García Gómez Emma Goldman Enzo Porter Eric Draitser Eric Paulson Eric Peters Eric Rasmusen Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Gant Eugene Girin Eugene Kusmiak Eve Mykytyn F. Roger Devlin Fadi Abu Shammalah Fantine Gardinier Federale Fenster Finian Cunningham The First Millennium Revisionist Fordham T. Smith Former Agent Forum Francis Goumain Frank Tipler Franklin Lamb Franklin Stahl Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary Heavin Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Galloway George Koo George Mackenzie George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Gilbert Cavanaugh Gilbert Doctorow Giles Corey Glen K. Allen Glenn Greenwald A. Beaujean Agnostic Alex B. Amnestic Arcane Asher Bb Bbartlog Ben G Birch Barlow Canton ChairmanK Chrisg Coffee Mug Darth Quixote David David B David Boxenhorn DavidB Diana Dkane DMI Dobeln Duende Dylan Ericlien Fly Gcochran Godless Grady Herrick Jake & Kara Jason Collins Jason Malloy Jason s Jeet Jemima Joel John Emerson John Quiggin JP Kele Kjmtchl Mark Martin Matoko Kusanagi Matt Matt McIntosh Michael Vassar Miko Ml Ole P-ter Piccolino Rosko Schizmatic Scorpius Suman TangoMan The Theresa Thorfinn Thrasymachus Wintz Gonzalo Lira Graham Seibert Grant M. Dahl Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Greg Klein Gregg Stanley Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Conte Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Gunnar Alfredsson Gustavo Arellano Hank Johnson Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Hans Vogel Harri Honkanen Heiner Rindermann Henry Cockburn Hewitt E. Moore Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Howe Abbot-Hiss Hubert Collins Hugh Kennedy Hugh McInnish Hugh Moriarty Hugo Dionísio Hunter DeRensis Hunter Wallace Huntley Haverstock Ian Fantom Igor Shafarevich Ira Chernus Ivan Kesić J. Alfred Powell J.B. Clark J.D. Gore J. Ricardo Martins Jacek Szela Jack Antonio Jack Dalton Jack Kerwick Jack Krak Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen Jake Bowyer James Bovard James Carroll James Carson Harrington James Chang James Dunphy James Durso James Edwards James Fulford James Gillespie James Hanna James J. O'Meara James K. Galbraith James Karlsson James Lawrence James Petras Jane Lazarre Jane Weir Janice Kortkamp Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Cannon Jason Kessler Jay Stanley JayMan Jean Bricmont Jean Marois Jean Ranc Jef Costello Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey D. Sachs Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman JHR Writers Jim Daniel Jim Fetzer Jim Goad Jim Kavanagh Jim Smith JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Dackman Joe Lauria Joel S. Hirschhorn Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Harrison Sims John Helmer John Hill John Huss John J. Mearsheimer John Jackson John Kiriakou John Macdonald John Morgan John Patterson John Leonard John Pilger John Q. Publius John Rand John Reid John Ryan John Scales Avery John Siman John Stauber John T. Kelly John Taylor John Titus John Tremain John V. Walsh John Wear John Williams Jon Else Jon Entine Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Revusky Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Sawyer Jonathan Schell Jordan Henderson Jordan Steiner Joseph Kay Joseph Kishore Joseph Sobran Josephus Tiberius Josh Neal Jeshurun Tsarfat Juan Cole Judith Coburn Julian Bradford Julian Macfarlane K.J. Noh Kacey Gunther Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Karl Haemers Karl Nemmersdorf Karl Thorburn Kees Van Der Pijl Keith Woods Kelley Vlahos Kenn Gividen Kenneth Vinther Kerry Bolton Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Michael Grace Kevin Rothrock Kevin Sullivan Kevin Zeese Kshama Sawant Larry C. Johnson Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Lawrence Erickson Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Leonard C. Goodman Leonard R. Jaffee Liam Cosgrove Lidia Misnik Lilith Powell Linda Preston Lipton Matthews Liv Heide Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett Louis Farrakhan Lydia Brimelow M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maciej Pieczyński Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marco De Wit Marcus Alethia Marcus Apostate Marcus Cicero Marcus Devonshire Margaret Flowers Margot Metroland Marian Evans Mark Allen Mark Bratchikov-Pogrebisskiy Mark Crispin Miller Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Gullick Mark H. Gaffney Mark Lu Mark Perry Mark Weber Marshall Yeats Martin Jay Martin K. O'Toole Martin Webster Martin Witkerk Mary Phagan-Kean Matt Cockerill Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Caldwell Matthew Ehret Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max Jones Max North Max Parry Max West Maya Schenwar Merlin Miller Metallicman Michael A. Roberts Michael Averko Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Hoffman Michael Masterson Michael Quinn Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Michelle Malkin Miko Peled Mnar Muhawesh Moon Landing Skeptic Morgan Jones Morris V. De Camp Mr. Anti-Humbug Muhammed Abu Murray Polner N. Joseph Potts Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Nathan Cofnas Nathan Doyle Ned Stark Neil Kumar Nelson Rosit Nicholas R. Jeelvy Nicholas Stix Nick Griffin Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Nicolás Palacios Navarro Nils Van Der Vegte Noam Chomsky NOI Research Group Nomi Prins Norman Finkelstein Norman Solomon OldMicrobiologist Oliver Boyd-Barrett Oliver Williams Oscar Grau P.J. Collins Pádraic O'Bannon Patrice Greanville Patrick Armstrong Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Patrick Lawrence Patrick Martin Patrick McDermott Patrick Whittle Paul Bennett Paul Cochrane Paul De Rooij Paul Edwards Paul Engler Paul Gottfried Paul Larudee Paul Mitchell Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Paul Souvestre Paul Tripp Pedro De Alvarado Peter Baggins Ph.D. Peter Bradley Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Lee Peter Van Buren Philip Kraske Philip Weiss Pierre M. Sprey Pierre Simon Povl H. Riis-Knudsen Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Qasem Soleimani Rachel Marsden Raches Radhika Desai Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ralph Raico Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Ramzy Baroud Randy Shields Raul Diego Ray McGovern Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Reginald De Chantillon Rémi Tremblay Rev. Matthew Littlefield Ricardo Duchesne Richard Cook Richard Falk Richard Foley Richard Galustian Richard Houck Richard Hugus Richard Knight Richard Krushnic Richard McCulloch Richard Silverstein Richard Solomon Rick Shenkman Rick Sterling Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Debrus Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Fisk Robert Hampton Robert Henderson Robert Inlakesh Robert LaFlamme Robert Lindsay Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Stark Robert Stevens Robert Trivers Robert Wallace Robert Weissberg Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Rolo Slavskiy Romana Rubeo Romanized Visigoth Ron Paul Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning RT Staff Ruuben Kaalep Ryan Andrews Ryan Dawson Sabri Öncü Salim Mansur Sam Dickson Sam Francis Sam Husseini Sayed Hasan Scot Olmstead Scott Howard Scott Ritter Servando Gonzalez Sharmine Narwani Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Sietze Bosman Sigurd Kristensen Sinclair Jenkins Southfront Editor Spencer Davenport Spencer J. Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen F. Cohen Stephen J. Rossi Stephen J. Sniegoski Stephen Paul Foster Sterling Anderson Steve Fraser Steve Keen Steve Penfield Steven Farron Steven Yates Subhankar Banerjee Susan Southard Sydney Schanberg Talia Mullin Tanya Golash-Boza Taxi Taylor McClain Taylor Young Ted O'Keefe Ted Rall The Crew The Zman Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas A. Fudge Thomas Anderson Thomas Hales Thomas Dalton Thomas Ertl Thomas Frank Thomas Hales Thomas Jackson Thomas O. Meehan Thomas Steuben Thomas Zaja Thorsten J. Pattberg Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Timothy Vorgenss Timur Fomenko Tingba Muhammad Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Engelhardt Tom Mysiewicz Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Torin Murphy Tracy Rosenberg Travis LeBlanc Vernon Thorpe Virginia Dare Vito Klein Vladimir Brovkin Vladimir Putin Vladislav Krasnov Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walt King Walter E. Block Warren Balogh Washington Watcher Washington Watcher II Wayne Allensworth Wei Ling Chua Wesley Muhammad White Man Faculty Whitney Webb Wilhelm Kriessmann Wilhem Ivorsson Will Jones Will Offensicht William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Wyatt Peterson Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen Yaroslav Podvolotskiy Yvonne Lorenzo Zhores Medvedev
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2020 Election Academia American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Black Crime Black Lives Matter Blacks Britain Censorship China China/America Conspiracy Theories Covid Culture/Society Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Gaza Hamas History Holocaust Ideology Immigration IQ Iran Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Joe Biden NATO Nazi Germany Neocons Open Thread Political Correctness Race/Ethnicity Russia Science Syria Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 汪精衛 100% Jussie-free Content 1984 2008 Election 2012 Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2022 Election 2024 Election 23andMe 9/11 9/11 Commission Report Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Mehdi Muhandas Achievement Gap ACLU Acting White Adam Schiff Addiction ADL Admin Administration Admixture Adolf Hitler Advertising AfD Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Age Age Of Malthusian Industrialism Agriculture AI AIPAC Air Force Aircraft Carriers Airlines Airports Al Jazeera Al Qaeda Al-Shifa Alain Soral Alan Clemmons Alan Dershowitz Albania Albert Einstein Albion's Seed Alcoholism Alejandro Mayorkas Alex Jones Alexander Dugin Alexander Vindman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Alexei Navalny Algeria Ali Dawabsheh Alien And Sedition Acts Alison Nathan Alt Right Altruism Amazon Amazon.com America America First American Civil War American Dream American History American Indians American Israel Public Affairs Committee American Jews American Left American Nations American Nations American Presidents American Prisons American Renaissance Amerindians Amish Amnesty Amnesty International Amos Hochstein Amy Klobuchar Amygdala Anarchism Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Greece Ancient Rome Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Bacevich Andrew Sullivan Andrew Yang Anglo-America Anglo-imperialism Anglo-Saxons Anglosphere Angola Animal IQ Animal Rights Wackos Animals Ann Coulter Anne Frank Anthony Blinken Anthony Fauci Anthrax Anthropology Anti-Defamation League Anti-Gentilism Anti-Semites Anti-Vaccination Anti-Vaxx Anti-white Animus Antifa Antifeminism Antiracism Antisemitism Antisemitism Awareness Act Antisocial Behavior Antizionism Antony Blinken Apartheid Apartheid Israel Apollo's Ascent Appalachia Apple Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaeogenetics Archaeology Archaic DNA Architecture Arctic Arctic Sea Ice Melting Argentina Ariel Sharon Armageddon War Armenia Armenian Genocide Army Arnold Schwarzenegger Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Arthur Lichte Artificial Intelligence Arts/Letters Aryans Aryeh Lightstone Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians Assassination Assassinations Assimilation Atheism Atlanta AUMF Auschwitz Australia Australian Aboriginals Autism Automation Avril Haines Ayn Rand Azerbaijan Azov Brigade Babes And Hunks Baby Gap Balfour Declaration Balkans Balochistan Baltics Baltimore Riots Banjamin Netanyahu Banking Industry Banking System Banks #BanTheADL Barack Obama Baseball Statistics Bashar Al-Assad Basketball #BasketOfDeplorables BBC BDS BDS Movement Beauty Beethoven Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Bela Belarus Belgium Belgrade Embassy Bombing Ben Cardin Ben Hodges Ben Rhodes Ben Shapiro Ben Stiller Benny Gantz Bernard Henri-Levy Bernie Sanders Betsy DeVos Betty McCollum Bezalel Smotrich Bezalel Yoel Smotrich Biden BigPost Bilateral Relations Bilingual Education Bill Clinton Bill De Blasio Bill Gates Bill Kristol Bill Maher Bill Of Rights Billionaires Billy Graham Bioethics Biology Bioweapons Birmingham Birth Rate Bitcoin Black Community Black History Month Black Muslims Black Panthers Black People Black Slavery BlackLivesMatter BlackRock Blake Masters Blank Slatism BLM Blog Blogging Blogosphere Blond Hair Blood Libel Blue Eyes Boasian Anthropology Boeing Boers Bolshevik Revolution Bolshevik Russia Books Boomers Border Wall Boris Johnson Bosnia Boycott Divest And Sanction Brain Drain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Bret Stephens Brett McGurk Bretton Woods Brexit Brezhnev Bri Brian Mast BRICs Brighter Brains British Empire British Labour Party British Politics Buddhism Build The Wall Bulldog Bush Business Byzantine Caitlin Johnstone California Californication Camp Of The Saints Canada #Cancel2022WorldCupinQatar Cancer Candace Owens Capitalism Carl Von Clausewitz Carlos Slim Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Cars Carthaginians Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Cats Caucasus CDC Ceasefire Cecil Rhodes Census Central Asia Central Intelligence Agency Chanda Chisala Chaos And Order Charles De Gaulle Charles Manson Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charlie Hebdo Charlottesville Checheniest Chechen Of Them All Chechens Chechnya Chernobyl Chetty Chicago Chicagoization Chicken Hut Child Abuse Children Chile China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese IQ Chinese Language Christian Zionists Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Christopher Wray Chuck Schumer CIA Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil Rights Movement Civil War Civilization Clannishness Clash Of Civilizations Class Classical Antiquity Classical History Classical Music Clayton County Climate Climate Change Clint Eastwood Clintons Coal Coalition Of The Fringes Coen Brothers Cognitive Elitism Cognitive Science Cold Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Powell Colin Woodard College Admission College Football Colonialism Color Revolution Columbia University Columbus Comic Books Communism Computers Condoleezza Rice Confederacy Confederate Flag Congress Conquistador-American Conservatism Conservative Movement Conservatives Conspiracy Theory Constantinople Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumerism Controversial Book Convergence Core Article Cornel West Corona Corporatism Corruption COTW Counterpunch Country Music Cousin Marriage Cover Story COVID-19 Craig Murray Creationism Crime Crimea Crispr Critical Race Theory Cruise Missiles Crusades Crying Among The Farmland Cryptocurrency Ctrl-Left Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckery Cuckservatism Cuckservative CUFI Cuisine Cultural Marxism Cultural Revolution Culture Culture War Curfew Czars Czech Republic DACA Daily Data Dump Dallas Shooting Damnatio Memoriae Dan Bilzarian Danny Danon Daren Acemoglu Darwinism Darya Dugina Data Data Analysis Dave Chappelle David Bazelon David Brog David Friedman David Frum David Irving David Lynch David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Of The West Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Deborah Lipstadt Debt Debt Jubilee Decadence Deep State Deficits Degeneracy Democracy Democratic Party Demograhics Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denmark Dennis Ross Department Of Homeland Security Deplatforming Derek Chauvin Detroit Development Dick Cheney Diet Digital Yuan Dinesh D'Souza Discrimination Disease Disinformation Disney Disparate Impact Dissent Dissidence Diversity Diversity Before Diversity Diversity Pokemon Points Divorce DNA Dogs Dollar Domestic Surveillance Domestic Terrorism Doomsday Clock Dostoevsky Doug Emhoff Doug Feith Dresden Drone War Drones Drug Laws Drugs Duterte Dynasty Dysgenic Dystopia E. Michael Jones E. O. Wilson East Asia East Asian Exception East Asians Eastern Europe Ebrahim Raisi Economic Development Economic History Economic Sanctions Economy Ecuador Edmund Burke Edmund Burke Foundation Education Edward Snowden Effective Altruism Effortpost Efraim Zurofff Egor Kholmogorov Egypt Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2020 Election Fraud Elections Electric Cars Eli Rosenbaum Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elise Stefanik Elites Elizabeth Holmes Elizabeth Warren Elliot Abrams Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emil Kirkegaard Emmanuel Macron Emmett Till Employment Energy England Entertainment Environment Environmentalism Epidemiology Equality Erdogan Eretz Israel Eric Zemmour Ernest Hemingway Espionage Espionage Act Estonia Ethics Ethics And Morals Ethiopia Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity Ethnocentricty EU Eugene Debs Eugenics Eurabia Eurasia Euro Europe European Genetics European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Genetics Evolutionary Psychology Existential Risks Eye Color Face Shape Facebook Faces Fake News False Flag Attack Family Family Systems Fantasy FARA Farmers Fascism Fast Food FBI FDA FDD Federal Reserve Feminism Ferguson Ferguson Shooting Fermi Paradox Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates FIFA Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Finland Finn Baiting Finns First Amendment FISA Fitness Flash Mobs Flight From White Floyd Riots 2020 Fluctuarius Argenteus Flynn Effect Food Football For Fun Forecasts Foreign Agents Registration Act Foreign Policy Fourth Amendment Fox News France Francesca Albanese Frank Salter Frankfurt School Franklin D. Roosevelt Franz Boas Fraud Freakonomics Fred Kagan Free Market Free Speech Free Trade Freedom Of Speech Freedom French Revolution Friedrich Karl Berger Friends Of The Israel Defense Forces Frivolty Frontlash Furkan Dogan Future Futurism G20 Gambling Game Game Of Thrones Gavin McInnes Gavin Newsom Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians GDP Gen Z Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Equality Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Genealogy General Intelligence General Motors Generation Z Generational Gap Genes Genetic Diversity Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genghis Khan Genocide Genocide Convention Genomics Gentrification Geography Geopolitics George Floyd George Galloway George Patton George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush Georgia Germans Germany Ghislaine Maxwell Gilad Atzmon Gina Peddy Giorgia Meloni Gladwell Glenn Greenwald Global Warming Globalism Globalization Globo-Homo God Gold Golf Gonzalo Lira Google Government Government Debt Government Overreach Government Secrecy Government Spending Government Surveillance Government Waste Goyim Grant Smith Graphs Great Bifurcation Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Powers Great Replacement #GreatWhiteDefendantPrivilege Greece Greeks Greg Cochran Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Greta Thunberg Group Intelligence Group Selection GSS Guardian Guest Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns Guy Swan GWAS Gypsies H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Haiti Hajnal Line Halloween HammerHate Hannibal Procedure Happening Happiness Harvard Harvard University Harvey Weinstein Hassan Nasrallah Hate Crimes Fraud Hoax Hate Hoaxes Hate Speech Hbd Hbd Chick Health Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Hegira Height Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Hereditary Heredity Heritability Hezbollah High Speed Rail Hillary Clinton Hindu Caste System Hindus Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanics Historical Genetics History Of Science Hitler HIV/AIDS Hoax Holland Hollywood Holocaust Denial Holocaust Deniers Holy Roman Empire Homelessness Homicide Homicide Rate Homomania Homosexuality Hong Kong Houellebecq Housing Houthis Howard Kohr Huawei Hubbert's Peak Huddled Masses Huey Newton Hug Thug Human Achievement Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Evolutionary Genetics Human Evolutionary Genomics Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Rights Human Rights Watch Humor Hungary Hunt For The Great White Defendant Hunter Biden Hunter-Gatherers I.F. Stone I.Q. I.Q. Genomics #IBelieveInHavenMonahan ICC Icj Ideas Identity Ideology And Worldview IDF Idiocracy Igbo Igor Shafarevich Ilan Pappe Ilhan Omar Illegal Immigration Ilyushin IMF Impeachment Imperialism Imran Awan Inbreeding Income India Indian IQ Indians Individualism Indo-Europeans Indonesia Inequality Inflation Intelligence Intelligence Agencies Intelligent Design International International Affairs International Comparisons International Court Of Justice International Criminal Court International Relations Internet Interracial Marriage Interracism Intersectionality Intifada Intra-Racism Intraracism Invade Invite In Hock Invade The World Invite The World Iosef Stalin Iosif Stalin Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish Is Love Colorblind Isaac Herzog ISIS Islam Islamic Jihad Islamic State Islamism Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Bonds Israel Defense Force Israel Defense Forces Israel Separation Wall Israeli Occupation IT Italy Itamar Ben-Gvir It's Okay To Be White Ivanka Ivy League J Street Jackie Rosen Jacky Rosen Jair Bolsonaro Jake Sullivan Jake Tapper Jamal Khashoggi James Angleton James B. Watson James Clapper James Comey James Forrestal James Jeffrey James Mattis James Watson Janet Yellen Janice Yellen Japan Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Greenblatt JASTA JCPOA JD Vance Jeb Bush Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Goldberg Jeffrey Sachs Jen Psaki Jennifer Rubin Jens Stoltenberg Jeremy Corbyn Jerry Seinfeld Jerusalem Jerusalem Post Jesuits Jesus Jesus Christ Jewish Genetics Jewish History Jewish Intellectuals Jewish Power Jewish Power Party Jewish Supremacism JFK Assassination JFK Jr. Jill Stein Jingoism JINSA Joe Lieberman Joe Rogan John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John F. Kennedy John Hagee John Hawks John Kirby John Kiriakou John McCain John McLaughlin John Mearsheimer Joker Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Greenblatt Jonathan Pollard Jordan Peterson Joseph Kennedy Joseph McCarthy Josh Gottheimer Josh Paul Journalism Judaism Judge George Daniels Judicial System Julian Assange Jussie Smollett Justice Justin Trudeau Kaboom Kahanists Kaiser Wilhelm Kamala Harris Kamala On Her Knees Kanye West Karabakh War 2020 Karen Kwiatkowski Karine Jean-Pierre Kashmir Kata'ib Hezbollah Kay Bailey Hutchison Kazakhstan Keir Starmer Kenneth Marcus Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Williamson Khazars Khrushchev Kids Kim Jong Un Kinship Kkk KKKrazy Glue Of The Coalition Of The Fringes Knesset Kolomoisky Kompromat Korea Korean War Kosovo Kris Kobach Kristi Noem Ku Klux Klan Kubrick Kurds Kushner Foundation Kyle Rittenhouse Kyrie Irving Language Laos Larry C. Johnson Late Obama Age Collapse Latin America Latinos Law Lawfare LDNR Lead Poisoning Leahy Amendments Leahy Law Lebanon Lee Kuan Yew Leftism Lenin Leo Frank Leo Strauss Let's Talk About My Hair LGBT LGBTI Liberal Opposition Liberal Whites Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libya Light Skin Preference Lindsey Graham Linguistics Literacy Literature Lithuania Litvinenko Living Standards Liz Cheney Liz Truss Lloyd Austin Localism long-range-missile-defense Longevity Looting Lord Of The Rings Lorde Loudoun County Louis Farrakhan Love And Marriage Low-fat Lukashenko Lula Lyndon B Johnson Lyndon Johnson Madeleine Albright Mafia MAGA Magnitsky Act Malaysia Malaysian Airlines MH17 Manosphere Manufacturing Mao Zedong Maoism Map Marco Rubio Maria Butina Marijuana Marine Le Pen Marjorie Taylor Greene Mark Milley Mark Steyn Mark Warner Marriage Martin Luther King Martin Scorsese Marvel Marx Marxism Masculinity Mass Shootings Mate Choice Math Mathematics Mathilde Krim Matt Gaetz Max Boot Max Weber Maxine Waters Mayans McCain McCain/POW McDonald's Meat Media Media Bias Medicine Medieval Christianity Medieval Russia Mediterranean Diet Medvedev Megan McCain Meghan Markle Mein Obama MEK Mel Gibson Men With Gold Chains Meng Wanzhou Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Merkel Youth Merkel's Boner Merrick Garland Mexico MH 17 MI-6 Michael Bloomberg Michael Collins PIper Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lind Michael McFaul Michael Moore Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michelle Goldberg Michelle Ma Belle Michelle Obama Microaggressions Middle Ages Middle East Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Johnson Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mike Waltz Mikhael Gorbachev Miles Mathis Militarized Police Military Military Analysis Military Budget Military History Military Spending Military Technology Millennials Milner Group Minimum Wage Minneapolis Minorities Miriam Adelson Miscellaneous Misdreavus Mishima Missile Defense Mitch McConnell Mitt Romney Mixed-Race MK-Ultra Mohammed Bin Salman Monarchy Mondoweiss Money Mongolia Mongols Monkeypox Monogamy Moon Landing Hoax Moon Landings Moore's Law Morality Mormonism Mormons Mortality Mortgage Moscow Mossad Movies Muhammad Multiculturalism Music Muslim Ban Muslims Mussolini NAEP Naftali Bennett Nakba NAMs Nancy Pelos Nancy Pelosi Narendra Modi NASA Nation Of Hate Nation Of Islam National Assessment Of Educational Progress National Debt National Endowment For Democracy National Review National Security Strategy National Socialism National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans Natural Gas Nature Vs. Nurture Navalny Affair Navy Standards Nazis Nazism Neandertals Neanderthals Near Abroad Negrolatry Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolibs Neolithic Neoreaction Netherlands Never Again Education Act New Cold War New Dark Age New Horizon Foundation New Orleans New Silk Road New Tes New World Order New York New York City New York Times New Zealand New Zealand Shooting NFL Nicholas II Nicholas Wade Nick Eberstadt Nick Fuentes Nicolas Maduro Niger Nigeria Nike Nikki Haley NIMBY Nina Jankowicz No Fly Zone Noam Chomsky Nobel Prize Nord Stream Nord Stream Pipelines Nordics Norman Braman Norman Finkelstein Norman Lear North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway Novorossiya NSA Nuclear Power Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Nuremberg Nutrition NYPD Obama Obama Presidency Obamacare Obesity Obituary Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Wall Street October Surprise Oedipus Complex OFAC Oil Oil Industry Oklahoma City Bombing Olav Scholz Old Testament Oliver Stone Olympics Open Borders OpenThread Opinion Poll Opioids Orban Organized Crime Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Orwell Osama Bin Laden OTFI Our Soldiers Speak Out Of Africa Model Paganism Pakistan Paleoanthropology Palestine Palestinians Palin Panhandling Papacy Paper Review Parasite Burden Parenting Parenting Paris Attacks Partly Inbred Extended Family Pat Buchanan Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Findley Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Durov Pavel Grudinin Paypal Peace Peak Oil Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Pentagon Personal Genomics Personality Pete Buttgieg Pete Buttigieg Pete Hegseth Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Petro Poroshenko Pew Phil Rushton Philadelphia Philippines Philosophy Phoenicians Phyllis Randall Physiognomy Piers Morgan Pigmentation Pigs Pioneers Piracy PISA Pizzagate POC Ascendancy Podcast Poland Police Police State Polio Political Correctness Makes You Stupid Political Dissolution Political Economy Politicians Politics Polling Pollution Polygamy Polygyny Pope Francis Population Population Genetics Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Porn Pornography Portland Portugal Portuguese Post-Apocalypse Poverty Power Pramila Jayapal PRC Prediction Prescription Drugs President Joe Biden Presidential Race '08 Presidential Race '12 Presidential Race '16 Presidential Race '20 Prince Andrew Prince Harry Priti Patel Privacy Privatization Progressives Propaganda Prostitution protest Protestantism Proud Boys Psychology Psychometrics Psychopathy Public Health Public Schools Puerto Rico Puritans Putin Putin Derangement Syndrome QAnon Qassem Soleimani Qatar Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quiet Skies Quincy Institute R2P Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race/IQ Race Riots Rachel Corrie Racial Purism Racial Reality Racialism Racism Rafah Raj Shah Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Rape Rashida Tlaib Rationality Ray McGovern Raymond Chandler Razib Khan Real Estate RealWorld Recep Tayyip Erdogan Red Sea Refugee Crisis #refugeeswelcome Religion Religion And Philosophy Rentier Reparations Reprint Republican Party Republicans Review Revisionism Rex Tillerson RFK Assassination Ricci Richard Dawkins Richard Goldberg Richard Grenell Richard Haas Richard Haass Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Rightwing Cinema Riots R/k Theory RMAX Robert A. Heinlein Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Ford Robert Kagan Robert Kraft Robert Maxwell Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert O'Brien Robert Reich Robots Rock Music Roe Vs. Wade Roger Waters Rolling Stone Roman Empire Romania Romanticism Rome Ron DeSantis Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rotherham Rothschilds RT International Rudy Giuliani Rule Of Law Rush Limbaugh Russiagate Russian Demography Russian Elections 2018 Russian History Russian Media Russian Military Russian Nationalism Russian Occupation Government Russian Orthodox Church Russian Reaction Russians Russophobes Russophobia Russotriumph Ruth Bader Ginsburg Rwanda Sabrina Rubin Erdely Sacha Baron Cohen Sacklers Sailer Strategy Sailer's First Law Of Female Journalism Saint Peter Tear Down This Gate! Saint-Petersburg Salman Rushie Salt Sam Bankman-Fried Sam Francis Samantha Power Samson Option San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandy Hook Sapir-Whorf SAT Satanic Age Satanism Saudi Arabia Scandal Science Denialism Science Fiction Scooter Libby Scotland Scott Ritter Scrabble Sean Hannity Seattle Secession Select Post Self Determination Self Indulgence Semites Serbia Sergei Lavrov Sergei Skripal Sergey Glazyev Seth Rich Sex Sex Differences Sex Ratio At Birth Sexual Harassment Sexual Selection Sexuality Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shakespeare Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Shared Environment Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shimon Peres Shireen Abu Akleh Shmuley Boteach Shoah Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shulamit Aloni Shurat HaDin Sigal Mandelker Sigar Pearl Mandelker Sigmund Freud Silicon Valley Singapore Single Men Single Women Sinotriumph Six Day War Sixties SJWs Skin Color Slavery Slavery Reparations Slavoj Zizek Slavs Smart Fraction Social Justice Warriors Social Media Social Science Socialism Society Sociobiology Sociology Sodium Solzhenitsyn Somalia Sotomayor South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea Southeast Asia Soviet History Soviet Union Sovok Space Space Exploration Space Program Spain Spanish Spanish River High School SPLC Sport Sports Srebrenica St Petersburg International Economic Forum Stabby Somali Staffan Stage Stalinism Standardized Tests Star Trek Star Wars Starvation Comparisons State Department Statistics Statue Of Liberty Steny Hoyer Stephen Cohen Stephen Colbert Stephen Harper Stephen Jay Gould Stephen Townsend Stereotypes Steroids Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steven Pinker Strait Of Hormuz Strategic Ambiguity Stuart Levey Stuart Seldowitz Student Debt Stuff White People Like Sub-replacement Fertility Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subhas Chandra Bose Subprime Mortgage Crisis Suburb Suella Braverman Sugar Suicide Superintelligence Supreme Court Susan Glasser Susan Wild Svidomy Sweden Switzerland Symington Amendment Syrian Civil War Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Take Action Taliban Talmud Tatars Taxation Taxes Tea Party Technical Considerations Technology Ted Cruz Telegram Television Terrorism Terry McAuliffe Tesla Testing Testosterone Tests Texas THAAD Thailand The 10/7 Project The AK The American Conservative The Bell Curve The Bible The Black Autumn The Cathedral The Confederacy The Constitution The Eight Banditos The Family The Free World The Great Awokening The Left The Middle East The New York Times The South The States The Zeroth Amendment To The Constitution Theranos Theresa May Third World Thomas Jefferson Thomas Moorer Thought Crimes Tiananmen Massacre Tiger Mom TikTok TIMSS Tom Cotton Tom Massie Tom Wolfe Tony Blair Tony Blinken Tony Kleinfeld Too Many White People Torture Trade Trans Fat Trans Fats Transgender Transgenderism Transhumanism Translation Translations Transportation Travel Trayvon Martin Trolling True Redneck Stereotypes Trump Trump Derangement Syndrome Trust Tsarist Russia Tucker Carlson Tulsa Tulsi Gabbard Turkey Turks TWA 800 Twins Twitter Ucla UFOs UK Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unbearable Whiteness Unemployment UNHRC Unions United Kingdom United Nations United Nations General Assembly United Nations Security Council United States Universal Basic Income UNRWA Urbanization Ursula Von Der Leyen Uruguay US Blacks US Capitol Storming 2021 US Civil War II US Constitution US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 US Regionalism USA USAID USS Liberty USSR Uyghurs Uzbekistan Vaccination Vaccines Valdimir Putin Valerie Plame Vdare Venezuela Vibrancy Victoria Nuland Victorian England Video Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Viktor Orban Viktor Yanukovych Violence Vioxx Virginia Virginia Israel Advisory Board Vitamin D Vivek Ramaswamy Vladimir Zelensky Volodymur Zelenskyy Volodymyr Zelensky Vote Fraud Voter Fraud Voting Rights Voting Rights Act Vulcan Society Wall Street Walmart Wang Ching Wei Wang Jingwei War War Crimes War Guilt War In Donbass War On Christmas War On Terror War Powers War Powers Act Warhammer Washington DC WASPs Watergate Wealth Wealth Inequality Wealthy Web Traffic Weight WEIRDO Welfare Wendy Sherman West Bank Western Decline Western European Marriage Pattern Western Hypocrisy Western Media Western Religion Western Revival Westerns White America White Americans White Death White Flight White Guilt White Helmets White Liberals White Man's Burden White Nakba White Nationalism White Nationalists White People White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Teachers Whiterpeople Whites Who Whom Whoopi Goldberg Wikileaks Wikipedia William Browder William Kristol William Latson William McGonagle William McRaven WINEP Winston Churchill WMD Woke Capital Women Woodrow Wilson Workers Working Class World Bank World Economic Forum World Health Organization World Population World Values Survey World War G World War H World War Hair World War I World War III World War R World War T World War Weed WTF WVS WWII Xi Jinping Yahya Sinwar Yair Lapid Yemen Yevgeny Prigozhin Yoav Gallant Yogi Berra's Restaurant Yoram Hazony YouTube Yugoslavia Yuval Noah Harari Zbigniew Brzezinski Zimbabwe Zionism Zionists Zvika Fogel
Nothing found
Filter?
AlexanderEngUK
Comments
• My
Comments
84 Comments • 9,200 Words •  RSS
(Commenters may request that their archives be hidden by contacting the appropriate blogger)
All Comments
 All Comments
    Our political landscape is completely flooded by a massive tide of official propaganda. Therefore, it's hardly surprising that the few visible points of surviving dissent are often found among those individuals who had previously represented the highest peaks of journalism and academic scholarship. Seymour Hersh falls into that category. With a Pulitzer Prize and five...
  • @Ron Unz
    @follyofwar


    Not to criticize, Mr. Unz, but why do nearly always end your articles by switching to your pet Covid theory, when the rest of essay is unrelated, except for the censorship angle. Of course, as our benevolent host it’s your prerogative.
     
    Sure, that's a perfectly valid criticism and frankly I often have to grit my teeth with embarrassment as I try to figure out a way to shoehorn my Covid origins analysis into the end of an article that's only somewhat related.

    But the problem is that until just the last few weeks, I'd spent nearly three years as virtually the only person on the entire Internet regularly advocating and promoting the Covid biowarfare hypothesis. Moreover, just days after I'd published my original April 2020 article, our entire website had been banned by Facebook and deranked by Google, making it much more difficult to disseminate those ideas. Youtube shadow-bans controversial Covid videos and nearly all the podcasters are too fearful of being deplatformed to go near the topic.

    So the only real means I have of getting my analysis into further circulation is to have it hitch a ride on some of the other articles I wrote. For example, my Covid video interviews will probably pick up another 40-50,000 views today because I included them at the bottom. So for another 50K views in one day I just grit my teeth and go ahead.

    Replies: @Lon Munz, @AlexanderEngUK, @H. L. M

    If shoehorning is all that remains, then shoehorning it must be.

    Just be careful with your teeth! Maybe wear a mouthguard while working on the end of non-related articles.

    You’re in good company, though. It looks as though James O’Keefe, founder of Project Veritas, is being or has been sacked by Project Veritas’s Board of Directors for his recent journalism on much the same thing, though he survives on twitter for now: https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1618771943855120386 (legendary video, a must-watch if you haven’t seen it). Video can be viewed here if you’re not on twitter: https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1618736315343724546/pu/vid/1280×720/wmoakWkLq8HRz5pu.mp4?tag=14.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @AlexanderEngUK

    James O'Keefe fucked around with the GNAA (Gay Niggers of America Association). And found out.

  • Note to Readers: Some of the content of this essay was extracted from an article in The Barnes Review, Jan./Feb. 2001, pp. 41-45, by M. Raphael Johnson, Ph.D., assistant editor of TBR. It was published with permission in a digitized version © 2002-2019 by The Scriptorium.[1] The Jews over the centuries have executed numerous atrocities...
  • @Lorian Effervis
    @Tranceislife

    I am not Larry and feel free to completely disregard my unasked for input- just in case if it might be helpful:

    In this article by Ron (Unz) you can find well sourced information about that particular time in Germany:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-understanding-world-war-ii/

    One book in particular-also mentioned there- by the contemporary renowned british scholar Sir Arthur Bryant describes in -surprisingly objective- detail the exact economical and societal difficulties between the jewish minority and the german majority during that period.
    Available for free here:

    https://archive.org/details/ArthurBryantUnfinishedVictory1940V1/Arthur%20Bryant%20-%20Unfinished%20Victory%20%281940%29%20-%20v1/

    Another imo very interesting and objective description by another contemporary witness and intellectual is found in the famous 1961 speech by american jewish public figure Benjamin Freedman in the Washington Willard Hotel. Available in full here:

    https://andrewcarringtonhitchcock.com/2023/01/27/ach-2044-benjamin-freedman-the-complete-1961-speech-from-the-willard-hotel-in-washington-d-c/

    According to what I remember off these sources and others I have read it is -if they are correct-purely numerically undeniable that the Jewish minority ( less than 1% of whole population) had very obviously very disproportionate high influence in the german overall economy, especially high finance and trading and certain positions in society (especially media and entertainment/theater), as an example so had that minority miracleously managed to gain ownership of ca every third property of all of Germany (mainly accrued by importing foreign money and misusing the german inflation disaster to buy up the bulk of those for pennies on the dollar from desperate Germans) during exactly those interim years..

    The claim-as you cite- that they controlled up to 90% of the economy is an unnecessary exaggeration as far as I have read sofar and also the claim about them fully controlling the prostitution-trade.

    Many desperate german women and children during the miserable Weimar-period , especially in the large metropoles, seem to have had to resort to prostitution and again there seems to be an undeniably purely statistical large overrepresentation of jewish night-club owners and other facilitators of those immoral services (which even jewish sources usually do not even deny), but them controlling all I have not seen hard evidence for so far (if anyone has, please hint me to it of course!).

    I fwiw think it is very important to keep an eye out for such very unnecessary half-truth exaggerations, for they are really the least thing needed, as the sober hard statistical evidence speaks more than enough for itself.

    Just my four cents..as said feel free to totally ignore me jumping in.
    Cheers.

    Replies: @Davy Crockit, @AlexanderEngUK

    Great reply, thanks. And thanks for the links, they look interesting.

  • All of these countries, all over the world, are switching teams. China is offering trade and prosperity, while America demands total control of domestic politics. China is peaceful, whereas America wants to use war to force everyone on earth to have gay anal with children. RT: Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro has proposed establishing a new...
  • “the only possible explanation I can think of is that they are planning to up the ante and start a world war, which they think they will win”

    If you go to the zionist oligarchs’ WEF website at weforum.org, they tell you some of their policies. One of the main ones is deindustrialisation of the countries they control – the West and the EU. Covid lockdowns and refusal to buy cheap Russian energy are recent applications of that policy. After Ukraine, I’m not sure what is next in the deindustrialisation pipeline, perhaps Taiwan or a ratcheting up of the climate change propaganda, or maybe another artificial pandemic, or something else.

  • The first post-cold war assault on Russia by the West began in the early 1990s well before the expansion of NATO. It took the form of a U.S.-induced economic depression in Russia that was deeper and more disastrous than the Great Depression that devastated the U.S. in the 1930s. And it came at a time...
  • There are many layers of the onion of truth. One of the layers of obfuscation/distraction/misdirection is that the current Ukrainian conflict is about weakening Russia. If that were so, the economic sanctions on Russia would have been discarded in the summer or would’ve never started due to the sanctions making Russia stronger both economically and politically, which was forecast by many ordinary people back in February and March last year.

    Ukraine is mainly about deindustrialising the West and the EU, which are run by hostile zionist oligarchs. That’s why the sanctions continue even though it’s beyond obvious to any thinking person that the West and the EU are suffering from them, while Russia has returned to growth and is building stronger ties with much of the non-Western world, including important countries like China and India (and Turkey).

    For further details on the ongoing, planned deindustrialisation of the West and the EU (and the advancement of tyranny in those places), see the zionist oligarchs’ World Economic Forum (WEF) website at weforum.org. They’re NOT doing it because they care about the environment or have anyone’s interests at heart except their own and Israel’s. Note that Israel cheerleads for the war in Ukraine and sanctions on Russia, but does not participate in the sanctions itself.

  • In the special New Year’s Edition of False Flag Weekly News I asked E. Michael Jones if he had any predictions for 2023. Here is a condensed and edited transcript. Kevin Barrett: Last year at this time we were going from 2021 to 2022. And little did we know it would be the year of...
  • Does anyone still think that Ukraine war is not a Jew show?
    https://www.theamericanconservative.com/blackrock-plots-to-buy-ukraine/

    • Agree: AlexanderEngUK
    • Thanks: Alternate History
    • Replies: @Scripted Reality
    @Sir Launcelot Canning

    Looks like the whole world is working like a Late Night Show:

    The World is a theatre.
    All countries ar sitting in the audience.
    On stage Washington as the showmaster.
    The actual enemy is the "sidekick".
    Behind the scene are the real showmasters who write the scripted reality.

    What would America do when peace is breaking out?
    Since its existence America is simply alwas at war or involved in conflicts.
    It's all about domination of the world.

    Nobody would care about Ukraine.
    Nobody would care about Taiwan.
    Both are side-kicks for a proxy war (Ukraine for Russia) or as a reason for conflict (Taiwan for China).

    "Keep the fire burning" vs. peace.

    "I spent my whole life being a high class muscle man for Wall Street,banks and Big Business.In short I was a racketeer for capitalism"
    Smedley Darlington Butler (1881-1940), General of USMC

    America rules the world.
    But the real powerful, non-democratic and non-elected playing the black figures vs. white figures on the chess-board.
    Money rules the world.

    , @JM
    @Sir Launcelot Canning

    The Global Cartel - ULTRA-IMPERIALISM - in action. It's now all a complex involving the MIC, the Deep State, the USA Military, the Corporations and all the rest.

    , @GomezAdddams
    @Sir Launcelot Canning

    John Johnson---QuarterMaster--Mojo are 3----

    , @Anonymous
    @Sir Launcelot Canning

    It’s a safe bet that Blinken, Klain, Sherman, Garland, Mayorkas, and the rest of the “minyan” running the imposter Biden grew up in the Jewish leftist milieu hating America and seeking the overthrow of the government and replacement with a soviet system. That other puppet Obama signed some EO dividing the US into, effectively, ten soviets, as I recall. Clinton was dubbed “America’s first Jewish president,” and when asked what it was like being the most powerful man in the world, quipped that he couldn’t do anything without the Jews’ permission. Then that jackass, W, was reading a story book while “Israel did 9/11,” as Dr. Sabrosky puts it.

    It follows from just those few points that this latest war is a Jewish show involving depopulation of the Ukraine’s best young men on the battlefield or otherwise forced to flee West while Blackrock intends on getting away with buying up the Ukraine for pennies on the dollar by calling it “investment,” à la Perkins’s Confessions of an Economic Hit Man.

    Several years ago some agricultural think tank documented a Chabad front operation buying up Ukraine farmland by the thousands of acres, as well as an Ivy League endowment or two getting in on the action, Harvard included I believe, talking indigenous rights out of one side of their mouth in the latter case while throwing the poorest Ukrainian farmers in the street. If it’s a Jewish war to effectively annex the Ukraine, then Congress will spare no expense in assuring that the Crimea and Odessa are part of the package, even if it means destroying the US in the process.

    Replies: @judd

    , @Doug Ryler
    @Sir Launcelot Canning

    When Russia wins, it will bring down the Jewish Financial Mafia.

    http://biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com/2015/03/17/the-truth-about-the-conflict-with-russia/

    Replies: @HallParvey

    , @anonymous
    @Sir Launcelot Canning

    IF Puttin doesn't WIN in Ukraine quick/massively/decisively ASAP..HE will lose his presidency/country. . .Russia will Cease to exist as is..NATO will expand EastWard ..

  • Obviously, there is nothing hateful, violent, threatening or harassing about my utterly empirical tweet (for documentation from CDC and FBI data, see my recent columns "Triggered" and "The Floyd Effect.") I await my apology from Twitter. Update: I want to thank everybody who has contributed to my December fundraiser so far. Here are ten ways...
  • African Americans are a protected class in America. You can’t point out the fact that they are more criminal and less intelligent on average. 85 average iq and 60 percent of known homicide offenders= hate stats. Jews, gays, Muslims, blacks= Off limits

    • Replies: @Mishima Zaibatsu
    @Truth over will and desire

    Indeed. I got suspended for pointing out that 85 per cent of sexual abuse in the Catholic Church is homosexual in nature.

    Replies: @G. Poulin, @Ben tillman

    , @Colin Wright
    @Truth over will and desire

    '...Jews, gays, Muslims, blacks= Off limits'

    Meh. In my experience, hating Muslims is perfectly permissible -- even praised.

    You're allowed to have reservations about Hispanics and Asians. Gays? This tends to be a matter of what kind of gay. The guy who washes your daughter's cat or the guy who wants to hold a Drag Queen story hour? This is redneck city, but I've encountered several obvious homosexuals. They're tolerated.

    Blacks are technically off-limits -- but we all know the truth. Those who don't, learn.

    Jews? Now there you're really committing thought crime. A lot of people still don't want to face facts.

  • Fuck around and find out–meet the new boss same as the old boss.

  • Tucker Carlson hosts the most popular cable news show and last Thursday he aired an explosive segment in which he declared that that 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy had been the work of a conspiracy, with our own CIA heavily involved. Carlson's regular nightly audience is over 3 million, and more than a...
  • @michael888
    Ron Unz keeps pushing his theories (and it's a bit disconcerting when he rolls unrelated topics like the assassination of JFK and the origin of Covid together.)
    I think the evidence that Thane Eugene Cesar assassinated RFK is straight-forward and implicates the CIA almost as an after-thought operation to avoid RFK following up on his brother's assassination when RFK became President. The JFK plots have so muddied the waters, the destruction of evidence, the cottage industry of many well-meaning journalists who have axes to grind, and the CIA spreading breadcrumbs continually for 60 years to lead truth-seekers astray, likely means we will never know what happened (which is better than "knowing" something that is fed to us officially and is false).

    The Covid origin theory is in the process of being muddied in the same way. Fauci and friends totally avoided the Moratorium on Gain of Function Research Funding knowing that otherwise his legacy would be the deaths of over 6 million people. The virologists involved, even tangentially with good intentions, very likely will have their careers DESTROYED if the truth comes out, so they are constantly playing CYA. Ron Unz gives undue credence to Danielle Anderson, a two-month visiting virologist (who obviously would also be threatened with loss of funding if SARS-CoV2 was lab-derived, as most scientists believe-- there is no way around the human codons in the furin cleavage site, as REAL experts like David Baltimore and others quickly noted.) Barring a whistle-blower from a bioweapons lab spilling the beans (unlikely), the most credible possibility is a common cold coronavirus was a low-level project with little security or scrutiny. Some young scientist, postdoc or grad student added a functional furin cleavage site (commonly added to viruses to enhance replication in culture and grow titers of the virus quicker) and grew the resultant virus in human cell lines, then probably passaged the virus through humanized mice, or maybe never made it that far and were infected themselves, and caught "a cold". As the CDC has noted three out of four Covid cases go unreported: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/burden.html (and these cases are due to the more advanced totally humanized strains).
    While Covid is deadly in the elderly (median age of Covid death globally is 82) and the seriously ill, the virus is essentially a common cold/ mild flu in the young and healthy. Lab technicians, postdocs, grad students and bench scientists are generally young and healthy. Increasingly it appears the virus was circulating since late summer/ early fall of 2019. Likely partially well humanized in the first infected people, SARS-CoV2 would continue to evolve and become even more optimized for humans by passaging through humans. No one would have been concerned with occasional pneumonias, even deaths, until a critical mass were infected. This is the most obvious and benign possibility. A lab accident with a relatively benign cold virus.
    Surely more nefarious scenarios involving "intelligence" are possible (and I believe Iran's outbreak likely had a "helping hand". ) But you need much more evidence to postulate such scenarios. Italy's outbreak seems traced to a Chinese community there. It is human nature during an epidemic for people to run away to "escape" the virus; these are the people most important in spreading and creating a pandemic.

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman, @Bard of Bumperstickers, @AlexanderEngUK

    I think you didn’t understand why Ron Unz put the JFK assassination and the covid origin issues together. It’s to do with the cover-ups, specifically how the intelligence ‘services’ persuade relevant, important people to support the public cover-up story.

    JFK:-
    Reality: It was a Mossad-planned operation with CIA assistance (a CIA faction)
    Private cover story to convince important people to support the public cover story: Oswald was a Russian agent but this can’t be disclosed because it might start WW3
    Public cover story: Oswald was a lone agent

    Covid origin:-
    Reality: Covid’s an American-made virus, used in biowarfare attacks in Wuhan and Iran
    Private cover story to convince important people to support the public cover story: Covid’s a Chinese-made virus, accidentally released, but this can’t be disclosed because it might start WW3
    Public cover story: Covid’s of natural origin

    They’re the same modus operandi, with carrot and stick for those able to think for themselves. Flatter the important people (and unsuccessful truth-seekers) with a bit of fake inside knowledge (carrot) while simultaneously fear-mongering them with WW3 (stick), and they’ll all help to keep the truth hidden.

    To speculate, I think zionists are behind both of those foul schemes and the subsequent cover ups (and many others) – the JFK assassination because it’s obvious how zionists benefitted via the Dimona nuclear reactor being allowed to continue, and the covid origin+attack because the Western lockdown responses were exactly in line with achieving the zionist oligarchs’ WEF-promoted agendas of increasing zionist control and the de-industrialisation of the West and the EU.

    I expect these ops to continue for as long as zionists control the West. The most high-profile, zionist-oligarch op at the moment is the Ukraine conflict, which has the same two main goals as covid and may turn out to be even more successful.

  • Ambrose Kane [AKA "RockaBoatus"] says:

    It’s been almost sixty years since JFK was assassinated, and it’s tempting for some to think that Washington corruption really only began around that time. But there is a mountain of evidence that our government has been deeply corrupt for many years prior. Some trace it to Lincoln’s presidency and some trace it even farther back to the very founding of our country. Entire books have been written documenting all of it.

    Granted, government corruption, schemes, assassinations, and crimes against foreign nations have increased since 1963, but there was never a genuinely ‘innocent era’ in America’s history as some might assume. And this will always be the case whenever deeply flawed, selfish and wicked humans are involved.

    The problem today is that the government doesn’t try too hard to conceal its lies as it once did. This is because there is little accountability for elected officials and government officers for what they say and do. Sure, there might be some congressional committee interrogations now and then, but few if any actually pay for their crimes against the American people.

    Our complicit media, of course, gladly spins all stories that might place any democrat administration in a poor light. All we get 24 hours a day are lies and half-truths. None of the establishment news outlets can be trusted, and only the most careful and discerning readers or listeners are able to sift through it all and arrive at the truth.

    I no longer immediately dismiss seemingly outrageous and ‘conspiratorial’ stories anymore as I once did. Stories such as the 9-11 coverup, the lies behind the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, the truth about Hitler and WW2, the truth about Jewish cultural and economic subversion, the Covid pandemic, including a host of other inconvenient factual realities has led me to question everything the government tells me. Their continual lies have conditioned me to do so.

    • Replies: @Realist
    @Ambrose Kane


    The problem today is that the government doesn’t try too hard to conceal its lies as it once did. This is because there is little accountability for elected officials and government officers for what they say and do.
     
    One main reason the Deep State doesn't try to conceal its duplicity is they believe they are in complete control and that the US citizenry is mostly stupid...sadly they are right.

    Great points in your comment.
    , @anaccount
    @Ambrose Kane

    Broadly I agree and you can put me into the Lincoln camp. That said, the assassination of JFK was a turning point. JFK was the last 'real president' or at least, he thought he was a real president. After that snuff film was made, there was a seismic shift in Washington. Every US politician knew that if it could happen to JFK, it could happen to them too. This is why we've had puppet leaders ever since.

    Replies: @anarchyst

    , @werpor
    @Ambrose Kane

    I do not remember not being able to read. Growing up our house was full of books and magazines. And the Sunday Times. My father was in the British Army. He was sent to Palestine in 1936 with the Expeditionary Force.

    I was born after the WW II; growing up while the war was over its shadow hung over everything.

    There were things I heard verbatim. And photographs and books. My aunts and uncles gave me books. My dad bought books as did his friends; those whom survived. My dad had Air Force friends; one chap had done two tours another was a Spitfire pilot. He had a couple of Naval officer friends; one a destroyer command, the other I cannot remember. They all read, they reminisced and regretted; and no doubt revealed stuff no longer important to conceal.

    I read English history in school. After crossing the Atlantic for a whole new life; I read American history; biographies, autobiographies, encompassing the years from early settlement through all the decades until now. Today I have a mental picture which is exactly as most every one pictures it. Except my mental picture includes many things redacted, omitted, covered up, obfuscated, deflected, and covertly reconstructed.

    Everything you share RockaBoatus is familiar. …And sad to say; much more of the same and worse! I’d bet you could share much more too. At no time was American history not enhanced and not mythologized. At no time were people not in need of borrowed capital. At no time was war not being promulgated and funded by capital borrowed from abroad. Our received legacy is one giant untruth!

    I have heard it said lenders of capital are neutral agents. …That politicians are the evil ones. But of course money lending — the how, why, when, where, what and whom is the fuse and the charge. Lenders lend or withhold loans. Lenders lobby. Lenders bribe. Lenders corrupt. Lenders lend strategically. They call loans strategically. They seek the highest returns. They fund the most wicked enterprise of all; war. There is no such thing as peace — only an absence of war, and only then because proxy wars appear to most as not our wars.

    Will recent revelations change anything? No! The apparatus of the state rather than shrink under the light of truth, next, metastasizes. The people become the enemy. Surveillance and violence and confinement and restrictions become normal. Society dies. Soon its every man and women and child for themselves. Elites after gaining the upper hand paint themselves into a corner or corners. Then they strike out at anybody and everybody. After this; the deluge!

    , @H. L. M
    @Ambrose Kane

    Yes, of course. The government propagates nothing but self-serving fairy tales.

    And the people believe them.

    Frankly speaking, it will be a blessing when the jew jab has killed most of the cretins that took it ---- because that vast majority is standing in the way of any progress that might be made in ridding ourselves of the parasite controllers.

  • Now, all we need is Carlson, or someone of that stature, to name Mossad too. Dulles, Helms, Hunt and Angleton, even figures like C. Douglas Dillion, and many others in that wonderful club, all knew the deal–Israel and international Jewry.

    • Agree: Realist, AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @RedpilledAF

    No commenter will ever go there. Of the theories it's a pretty good substantial one that connects to Rubinstein's ethnicity.

    Replies: @Old and Grumpy

    , @Emil Nikola Richard
    @RedpilledAF

    Ain't gonna happen.

    You might not even get Hunter's laptop contents or the Biden daughter's diary unless the top oligarchs need to ex- Biden in a hurry. These bums have got the irresistible forces AND the immovable objects.

    Tucker Carlson's performance last week was a chihuahua yap.

    , @SunBakedSuburb
    @RedpilledAF

    "Israel and international Jewry."

    As you state above, the CIA post war elite treated Mossad like an equal partner. Some of this is due to the significant influence of MI6 which was in on the creation of the CIA. MI6 is also an action arm of the City of London and its powerful Jewish and Zionist financers.

    In the case of James Angleton, perhaps the most interesting of the CIA founders, unwavering support of Zionism came from his own complex psychology. Before the war Angleton was an ardent critic of Jewish subterfuge and power. Alot of this stemmed from his mentorship with the poet Ezra Pound who had an unhealthy, self-destructive hatred of Jews. During the later stage of the war, while serving in the OSS and stationed in Italy, Angleton was instructed by Allen Dulles to build postwar networks to channel SS and Wehrmacht intelligence officers who might be useful for the conflict against Russia that Dulles and his allies in DC and Europe had in mind after the German surrender. Angleton, a devout Catholic, also had a hand in creating the Vatican "rat-lines" which funneled Nazis into the Middle East and South America.

    Angleton had a change of direction at some point during his dealings with the post war Nazi diaspora. A recent biography of Angleton speculated that this change could have emanated from his contact with Zionists at this time. Whatever the true cause, Angleton became a dedicated servant of Israel. Angleton also became the bureaucratic point-man for Dulles (fired by JFK from his DCI position in November 1961 in the wake of the Bay of Pigs debacle) as he ran the kill JFK operation from his Georgetown mansion. Recent scholarship has Angleton tapping into the postwar Nazi talent pool, specifically Otto Skorzeny's organization based in Madrid, for the assassins.

    , @Kali
    @RedpilledAF


    Now, all we need is Carlson, or someone of that stature, to name Mossad too.
     
    Nah, that remains our job.

    Unlike the "big names", we don't risk our lives by sharing the facts. Lots of people will discover the trail to the JQ thanks to the current attention on the JFK murder. As always, it's up to us little(r) people to point folks in the right direction.

    Probably better that way too. - Folks always seem to be looking for some sort of Pied Piper to follow, which in turn seems to dull their senses. :)

    Kind regards,
    Kali.

  • People need gas, okay Jews? The Chinese have a lot going on. The place looks like a friggin’ Mars base. You’ll notice the Jew media never shows pictures of Chinese cities. If Americans knew that China is advanced beyond the US by at least a 100 years – and they are continuing to go forward...
  • The jews will drive the west directly into the ground and then blame the destruction on white supremacy.

    • Thanks: Zane
  • Anonymous[186] • Disclaimer says:

    China exploiting Russia’s desperation and buying it’s natural gas and oil at a massive discount is not quite the win you think it is.

    It is a win for China. I commend their intelligence in giving Russia false promises at the Winter Olympics of helping them out militarily (through satellite intel, much in the same way NATO is helping Ukraine) in the event of an invasion, only to ditch them and then rape them for their natural resources.

    The Chinese are realists, they see how Russia has the largest hydrocarbon reserves in the world and despite this, 20% of its people still lack indoor plumbing and it has Africa-levels of STDs

    I say good on the Chinese for exploiting those moskal scum.

    [MORE]

    • Replies: @A B Coreopsis
    @Anonymous

    If you had basic, elementary school level intelligence, you’d realize that that graphic is from the post Russo-Japanese War.

    Is the item from your private collection of sodomite porn?

    , @bombthe3gorgesdam
    @Anonymous

    Right, China is the primary beneficiary of this war. Not only does it get cheap oil and gas, as you point out, but more importantly it's two great power rivals, Russia and America, are at each other's throats and will be for the foreseeable future, meaning they will not be uniting to take on China. This war is a disaster for America and Russia and a boon for China. One has to admire the Chinese for so correctly applying the principles of realism to their foreign policy, the way Americans once did with remarkable success (but have tragically abandoned in favor of our leaders' failed liberal internationalist ideology).

  • @Quartermaster
    Anglin, you are hilarious. China is trying to to keep their economy from falling off a cliff because of the mendacity of the CCP and its pets. All the while, Putin is presiding over an economy that is in the tank already. St. Petersburg doesn't even have the money to keep their streets clear.

    The corruption your hero Putin has facilitated and received the benefits of, has hollowed the country out. But, hang onto your Putinazi delusions. They will soon come crashing down around your ears.

    Replies: @Decoy, @furor kek tonicus, @neutral, @brostoevsky, @A B Coreopsis, @Poupon Marx, @anonymous, @Munga Bulga, @Dnought, @JR Foley, @Alrenous

    I don’t even have to look it up first to know that the streets of St. Petersburg are going to be cleaner that almost any American city, it comes down to not having many blacks.

    • Agree: AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @Realist
    @neutral

    Out of buttons but agree, thanks

    , @do chere
    @neutral

    Russia doesn't have blacks because they have not been into taking blacks as slaves. Also, not just the blacks sleep in tents in the streets in the US. Greedy capitalism dust-binned, impoverished whites also abound. The US can learn a lot from the Chinese and the Russians who helped blacks to stay home and liberate themselves from Western apartheid colonialism.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @showmethereal

  • Anglin, you are hilarious. China is trying to to keep their economy from falling off a cliff because of the mendacity of the CCP and its pets. All the while, Putin is presiding over an economy that is in the tank already. St. Petersburg doesn’t even have the money to keep their streets clear.

    The corruption your hero Putin has facilitated and received the benefits of, has hollowed the country out. But, hang onto your Putinazi delusions. They will soon come crashing down around your ears.

    • Disagree: Robert Dolan
    • LOL: Zane
    • Replies: @Decoy
    @Quartermaster

    Short but interesting article. The mention of Western media never showing pictures of Chinese cities is an astute observation. I might add that on occasion they do show a picture but it would be of one of several so called "ghost cities" and the picture is always at least 3 years old. What China has accomplished in 40 years will never be repeated. The United States had its heyday and what it accomplished was wonderful but it was nothing compared to China. I don't want to live there but we have to recognize that a form of government other than what we have here can work out very well.

    Replies: @Old Brown Fool, @showmethereal

    , @furor kek tonicus
    @Quartermaster

    to the extent that China is failing is due in large part to their adoption of absurd Western econ theories such as Keynesian stimulation and GDP formulation ( in which .gov spending is accorded the same value or benefit as private sector spending and, worse, they pretend that Debt has no detrimental impact ).
    .
    to the extent that China is succeeding, it is because we've offshored massive sectors of our economy and production to them.
    .
    and only a lying idiot would dispute that China is *SUCCEEDING* beyond your wildest dreams. as recently as the 1980s, China was a 3rd world country with a typical anemic communist economy and as many bicycles as people. 40 years later and they have so much surplus wealth that they literally build skyscraper cities to sit empty, just so they can bump up their goofball GDP numbers.

    Replies: @Fidelios Automata, @Anon, @Antiwar7, @Anonymous

    , @neutral
    @Quartermaster

    I don't even have to look it up first to know that the streets of St. Petersburg are going to be cleaner that almost any American city, it comes down to not having many blacks.

    Replies: @Realist, @do chere

    , @brostoevsky
    @Quartermaster

    So, you're an expert on St. Petersburg, eh? What's your favorite location there? Maybe the Hermatige? The Church on the spilt blood? How many times have you visited? Долбоёб!

    Replies: @Realist

    , @A B Coreopsis
    @Quartermaster

    Didn’t you recycle this post from 1991?

    , @Poupon Marx
    @Quartermaster

    If China has made many mistakes, they have the reserve and will to rectify and start back over an edified endeavor.

    Quartermaster is just another sayanim hasbara from the Computing and Hacking Service of Tel Aviv, where there are dozens in at least one room of young people tightly packed at their computer screens. This branch of Mossad brags about inserting misinformation and misrepresentation of forums such as these. That's why you find absurd and almost comically skewed opinion that are so highly skewed as to be considered in the realm of psychosis.

    But, they are well written in correct syntax and semantic level of higher grade. Repeating lies is what sociopaths do, and this turd is no exception. He was birthed from the rear entrance of George Soros, delivered by Michael Bloomberg, who also circumcised him, ate the foreskin and slurped up the blood from the procedure.

    , @anonymous
    @Quartermaster

    Shabbos Goy Quartermaster gets it wrong, again. What kind of "man" fiercely defends a society that hates him and his male posterity? Who does that? Cowards and eunuchs like Quartermaster do it. What a p**** this poseur is. Any White man defending the United States is lower than whale s*** and likely even dumber. Any rational person on earth wants to see the ZOG empire finally collapse. What would be something to see is the jew demanding that those they have persecuted for generations fall on their swords for the Khazarians. B******* like Quartermaster likely will, but I trust anyone with an IQ over 80 will not. Oy vey!

    Replies: @JR Foley

    , @Munga Bulga
    @Quartermaster

    Fucking stupid dumb mutt scum

    , @Dnought
    @Quartermaster

    LOL.

    https://news.yahoo.com/russian-budget-surplus-more-quadruples-131121288.html

    , @JR Foley
    @Quartermaster

    Greenspan was spinning paper currency that Ben Barnanke was proving quantitative easing was the solution of ballooning paper currency and having the Word dominated by monopoly play paper--nothing tangible supporting USA dollar and 31 Trillion of it is bogus loans. When the 31 Trillion Call is made ---USA will be PUT ---down?? I would be consulting either Sam Bankman Fried or perhaps Elon Must or Zylenskyy for their input----or perhaps again Benny Netanyahu knows best--Ponzi Scheme 101---Is Israel USA friend --you BET.

    , @Alrenous
    @Quartermaster

    Good bait. Got your (you).
    By performance this is great bait...though admittedly I can't see what's special about it.

  • As recently as last month, I was struck by the similarity of a headline on the popular Children’s Health Defense website to the headline of an article I had read elsewhere some years ago, dated 2012. The CHD article was titled “6 Companies Control 90% of What You Read, Watch and Hear. Here’s Why You...
  • @Haxo Angmark
    thanks for this near-definitive essay. Though the fact is,

    almost all the "non-Jews" named are mere shabbatz goyim, and

    usually with a proximate Jewish minder, generally the husband or wife,

    which is a general phenomenon in all recent/current sectors:

    e.g., J.P. Morgan honcho Jamie Dimon: Jew wife.

    e.g. VP Kamala Harris: Jew husband.

    e.g. that new female congoid on the SC: Jew husband.

    e.g. Trump offspring, inter-married with Jews.

    etc.

    Replies: @Pixo, @Ann Nonny Mouse, @mulga mumblebrain

    “ Trump offspring, inter-married with Jews.”

    Don’t forget Hunter Biden’s sexy young wife Melissa Cohen. Wow!

    https://heavy.com/news/hunter-biden-wife-melissa-cohen/

    • Agree: JR Foley, AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @Badger Down
    @Pixo

    She looks like Barry Manilov, the spare-parts surgery guy.

  • The USSR played the leading role in the defeat of Nazi Germany, which the majority of Europeans recognized in 1945 even if half a century of Hollywood propaganda successfully displaced it in the public imagination in favor of the USA. But what about within the USSR itself? Back in January 2015, during his brief nationalist...
  • AP says:
    @Mao Cheng Ji
    @German_reader


    Even as it was, there seem to have been many in Russia (not just in Ukraine and the recently annexed Baltics or Eastern Poland) who hated the Soviet system and mistakenly thought Germans would “liberate” them.
     
    That's not how ordinary people think. They don't expect heavily armed foreigners from far-away lands to 'liberate' them from their domestic governments. People collaborate with foreign invaders in order to survive, to get money, status, other advantages, but not to be 'liberated'. Ordinary people typically aren't fools (although intellectuals often are).

    Replies: @German_reader, @Jaakko Raipala, @AP

    That’s not how ordinary people think. They don’t expect heavily armed foreigners from far-away lands to ‘liberate’ them from their domestic governments.

    You are the last person to guess about how ordinary people think.

    A lot of people didn’t think of the Bolshevik gang as their domestic government. There were mass surrenders, and many cases of locals greeting the Germans as liberators early on, before the Germans revealed themselves.

    • Agree: AlexanderEngUK
  • @Passing By
    @Quartermaster

    Quartermaster: a footboy, valet, groom, lackey, caddy, page boy, whipping boy, factotum.

    You're just an old punk full of resentment. Your whole life is one tedious routine. Everybody you know has had a way more eventful life than you. But you served your country. At least, you're trying to convince yourself that you did. B/c in fact, you only served your superiors and nothing you did has ever made any difference. And somehow, in your deranged brain, it's the Russkies' fault if you're a pathetic loser. A disgusting p o s.

    Replies: @Quartermaster, @AlexanderEngUK

    Quartermaster is a troll, I think possibly a paid one as he repeats regime talking points, or the official propaganda narrative.

    • Replies: @Passing By
    @AlexanderEngUK

    Not so sure about him. Unlike other trolls, of whom many are late comers at Unz who appeared at the onset of the war in Ukraine and who disregard the truth for expediency, quartiermeister seems to believe his own non-sense. He's been here for years and unlike regular trolls who package bollocks in lengthy word salads full of circular reasoning, he most often keep his posts short and as far as I remember, his outlook has remained consistent throughout. He just missed some episodes like the fall of Communism in Russia and the end of the USSR, and doesn't grasp that the Bolsheviks have since settled in the USA.

  • James Morris (1926-2020), later Jan Morris, was likely the greatest travel writer in the English language of his generation. As the only reporter on Everest with Hillary, he brought down Fleet Street's scoop of the century on the morning of the Queen's coronation in 1953. Three years later, he broke the news that the French...
  • From what I get out of these excerpts, James Morris’ daughter, besides resenting how this “transition” changed her childhood for the worse, cares most that her ex-Dad didn’t use his new status to help the cause of feminism. Not everybody, or pretty much not ANYBODY, can be a secretary anymore, but the rest of Mr. Morris’ views on female roles is traditionally conservative.

    I.e, it sounds like this daughter did not have the courage and/or wisdom to actually criticize the whole idea of transitioning. She’s just pissed that her famous Dad didn’t help out the feminazis.

    … or, maybe she knows how resentful her former Dad was about how his ex-brother Uncle Mark, now his ex-sister Marsha, turned out much better, with more rounded breasts and nice long blond straight hair. Why is it always Marsha, Marsha, Marsha?!

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Achmed E. Newman

    She has every right to point out the pervert's hypocrisy. Having a conservative idea of what a woman is, not trying to conform to it whatsoever, yet still demanding everyone else call you a woman and kowtow to you and your fetish, with zero regard to your wife and children, including a very young and confused one. The gall.

    Can't imagine the horror of growing up with a father like that. Verges on abusive, really. Scum.

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman

  • @Bill P

    You don’t get to become whoever or whatever you want to be merely by deciding that’s who or what you are. And you don’t get to demand that others kowtow to you by treating your laughable delusions as if they were facts.
     
    Trans takes narcissism to a whole 'nother level.

    That's why it's celebrated by progressives. Narcissism is at the core of their faith. We used to call it pride.

    Replies: @Twinkie, @mc23, @John Johnson

    Yup. That was my impression – a mentally ill narcissist. To a great degree, this narcissism is the opposite of love, which ought to be the highest of human ideals. And love, of course, is the selfless giving of oneself to others, which, among women, is best expressed through the giving of life to her offspring (even at the risk of her own life) and caring for them – in other words, motherhood. “Trans women” grotesquely pervert this ideal and disfigure the very definition of womanhood into a warped imitation of the feminine physical form and the complete absence of what really makes for a woman spiritually.

    • Replies: @Bill P
    @Twinkie


    To a great degree, this narcissism is the opposite of love, which ought to be the highest of human ideals.
     
    My recent thinking on it is that it's an inversion of the proper relationship we should have with ourselves. We should love ourselves, but in the way a parent loves a child. If instead we put our "I" at the service of our "self" it leads to all sorts of disorder and deviation from truth, just as it would if a parent allowed a small child to be his/her master.

    I think this happens when people are unaware, or only dimly aware, that there is a distinction between the I and the self because of some developmental failure. The mature sense that "I must control myself" is replaced by a sense that all control is being imposed by some external nemesis, such as "society," "the patriarchy," "white supremacy," "heteronormativity" etc. So therefore whatever the selfish desire may be, no matter how vile or preposterous, any check on it is purely due to external tyranny that must be destroyed.

    Replies: @Twinkie

    , @AnotherDad
    @Twinkie


    To a great degree, this narcissism is the opposite of love, which ought to be the highest of human ideals.
     
    Terrific sentence Twinkie.

    Yeah, even allowing for "damaged daughter" retelling, this is a guy who basically doesn't give a shit about his family. They are props for his egotistical drama. Hideous deformed creature.

  • James Morris (1926-2020), later Jan Morris, was likely the greatest travel writer in the English language of his generation.

    I doubt it. How good can you really be, if you become totally bonkers and think you can “turn into a woman”? It shows a total detachment from objective reality, which doesn’t sound good for a travel writer. Never read him, never will.

    • Replies: @Renard
    @Dumbo

    Yeah, somehow I think I can forego the pleasure. Life's short and we must perforce be selective in our entertainments.

  • https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11527307/Ex-Navy-SEAL-transitioned-male-female-says-hes-transitioning-BACK.html?ito=native_share_article-top

    I’ve gone from genuine tolerance of these creatures to a profound aversion to them. This has less to do with the physical aspects of their transition, ridiculous and unseemly though they are, than it does with disgust at their arrogance. You don’t get to become whoever or whatever you want to be merely by deciding that’s who or what you are. And you don’t get to demand that others kowtow to you by treating your laughable delusions as if they were facts.

    I don’t wish any of these self-mutilating freaks well.

    • Replies: @AndrewR
    @Kylie

    I'd have more sympathy for the regime narrative about transgenderism if they also allowed transracialism. But despite constantly telling us that race is only a "social construct," they clearly have very essentialist views about race.

    Replies: @Kylie, @Colin Wright

    , @Bill Jones
    @Kylie

    I agree,

    There is a word for people who live in a world separate from reality, Insane.

    The same word applies to those who treat their delusions as real.

    , @anonymous
    @Kylie

    Agree. No different than if he had dressed himself as a king in regal garb, and expected to be treated as such, addressed not as "mister" but as "your highness."

    It's diabolical narcissism, especially the callous indifference to his daughter calling "daddy."

    , @AnotherDad
    @Kylie


    I’ve gone from genuine tolerance of these creatures to a profound aversion to them. This has less to do with the physical aspects of their transition, ridiculous and unseemly though they are, than it does with disgust at their arrogance. You don’t get to become whoever or whatever you want to be merely by deciding that’s who or what you are. And you don’t get to demand that others kowtow to you by treating your laughable delusions as if they were facts.
     
    Spot on Kylie. Arrogance.

    The whole story is just family abuse. But I thought this was the key bit:

    The reality, as my mother told me, was that my sister lay dying in hospital and Jan refused to go with my mother to visit her. … Jan’s words, then and ever after, completely failed to show any understanding of her pain. She had no empathy.
     

    Basically, these people are sociopaths. Extremely narcissistic sociopaths.

    The whole story here is complete disregard for the interest of his (its) family, to feed its overweening ego. The family would have been much better off if this POS just killed itself, left. Left them alone to get on with it. But it needed a stage and the family were props to be abused.

    In a sane society we'd just immediately expel such POS.

    But no ... they are a minority! And minorities are special. The rest of us must live our lives to support minorities, give them stuff and make sure their oh-so-special feelings are never, ever hurt.

    , @Prester John
    @Kylie

    To this crowd mere "toleration" no longer cuts it.

    From deviancy and freakdom to celebrity--all within a span of 50 years or so. How the worm has turned!

    A symptom of a society plunging headlong into the abyss.

    , @Anonymous
    @Kylie

    Any of them embracing it publicly is waging war on all that is good and must be CRUSHED.
    That said, most of these people have been abused and misled horribly by others.
    When they surrender unconditionally to truth and take up the active fight againt their abusers, wish them the best.
    IMO.

    , @Edward Dett
    @Kylie

    Agree. A point I'd like to add to this public square is an examination of the verb to identify as. This word shows up in "debates" on and with trans people. It is taken as synonymous with to prove to be, which in terms of traditional dictionary definitions, verbal logic, and empirical evidence, it is not.

    Clearing up this definitional matter would set the stage for arguing down this huge mistake that continues to harm people and children. T-g'nd'rism is predicated on the ideology that reality is whatever the most powerful say it is, a social construct. As I contemplate the mess we live in now in the West, deposing these beliefs will take an effort more at deprogramming brainwashing than just winning arguments and believing that psychological counseling will effect a Hail-Mary breakthrough by evoking shame or some dawn of conscience.

    Replies: @Kylie

  • Basically, a fetishist whose life revolved around the fetish.

    • Replies: @Bill Jones
    @Bardon Kaldian

    But Steve is right about the great writer piece. The eponymous photo of Fisher's Face really is something.
    Every characteristic hinted at here becomes more developed with age.

    https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1347843832l/1382803.jpg


    Wouldn't trust the guy as far as I could throw him.

    Replies: @PiltdownMan

    , @James N. Kennett
    @Bardon Kaldian


    Basically, a fetishist whose life revolved around the fetish.
     
    From the article:


    What did she want to be? I believe she wanted to be someone totally different from anyone else, a woman who was the centre of attention because of her difference. She was no ordinary woman, as she believed the rest of us were. She was always talked about, always put on some pedestal. Her ego was massive, with people constantly rubbing it. She was a woman who enjoyed being in a man’s world because she stood out.
     

     
    A precise description of The Man Who Would Be Queen.
    , @Chrisnonymous
    @Bardon Kaldian

    The fetish argument doesn't really cut it for me. Crossdressing has been a thing for a long time, but usually associated with being the receptive sexual partner for men, as is the phenomenon of transsexualism in places like Thailand, India, and Brazil, where it has been established longer.

    As far as I can tell, these macho late-life transitions are not really all about acting out the female role in sexual encounters. Often, they don't even bother to try to make themselves femininely sexy-looking, which crossdressing gays and 3rd world ladyboys almost always do (even if they fail at it).

    I think there's some other brain problem, although I'll be darned if I can say what it is.

    Replies: @John Johnson, @Anonymous

  • The explanation you’re not supposed to know about. This video is available on Rumble, BitChute, and Odysee. Last week, my video was about how r – K theory explains consistent patterns of racial difference in behavior. This week, I’ll talk about how the races became so different. The current theory is that modern humans first...
  • @Man Of East
    @lloyd


    They get dragged down in I Q tests by the warner clime Southern Europeans.
     
    And yet the greatest European civilizations were Italian and Greek.


    The Japanese are about as clever and stupid as Northern Europeans. The only race that invented on its own Western type culture and technology was the Japanese.
     
    I'm not sure what this even means. The Japanese really didn't invent much.

    Replies: @lloyd, @Biff, @Brian Damage

    @lloyd

    They get dragged down in I Q tests by the warner clime Southern Europeans

    .

    And yet the greatest European civilizations were Italian and Greek.

    The Japanese are about as clever and stupid as Northern Europeans. The only race that invented on its own Western type culture and technology was the Japanese.

    I’m not sure what this even means. The Japanese really didn’t invent much.

    Those Anglos always want to justify their superiority by highlighting the last 200 years against the evolutionary process of hundreds of thousands of years. Not enough sample. Perhaps a couple of millennia is enough sample.

    • Agree: Man Of East
    • Disagree: AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @Malla
    @Brian Damage


    highlighting the last 200 years
     
    200 years? WTF...

    Replies: @Brian Damage

  • Every now and then, I rediscover the vastness of the Internet. All this year I'd been quite interested in our conflict with Russia over Ukraine and I'd also begun separately following the public statements of Prof. Jeffrey Sachs of Columbia University, but until last week I hadn't noticed his late August interview on exactly that...
  • @Ron Unz
    @Antiwar7


    Obviously, that aid was not forthcoming. Krainer also writes that Sachs advocated for debt relief for Russia, something that Sachs had helped obtain for Poland (50% relief) and Bolivia (90% relief). On the contrary, the G7 threatened Russia with food aid cutoff if government debt service was interrupted at all.

    So Sachs looks moral and caring even then, and the piratical, evil West looks evil, even then.
     
    Thanks for the information, which doesn't really surprise me. I'd asked a couple of people whose views I trust, and they seemed to have a good opinion of Sachs. Also, he came across as quite sincere in those video interviews, including when he personally raised the Russian privatization issue.

    I was also surprised that he seemed to say nice things about Naomi Klein, even though she'd portrayed him as a leading villain in her book.

    Replies: @Wizard of Oz, @AlexanderEngUK

    Yes, I think Sachs is sincere too; he’s definitely scared of WW3 and I think at 68 he’s accepted that he’s now basically been retired, or cancelled for truth-telling on the covid origin, and he’s decided to be open with what he thinks because it’s important to the world (personally, I think WW3 is still a very low probability in at least the near future).

    I’ve never heard of that Naomi Klein book nor had I heard of Sachs until maybe a few months ago, and it appears to me he was never an intentionally bad guy, just perhaps overwhelmingly naive and a tool of machiavellians. He still appears to be somewhat naive now, actually.

    So I reckon Sachs is good enough as far as he goes, but he doesn’t go very far. Judging from his recent, upset comments in one of those videos along the lines of “America has to learn to play in the sandbox nicely!”, he has yet to meet the final boss in the game of geopolitical knowledge, which boss is, to put it bluntly, overwhelming, malevolent jewish oligarchical power in conjunction with widespread jewish tribalism, in the West, the EU and Israel, and I suspect he never will beat that boss if he meets it.

  • @Antiwar7
    A lot of commenters blame Jeffrey Sachs for the pillaging of Russia in the 1990's, but I'm reading the (excellent) book _Grand Deception: The Truth about Bill Browder, the Magnitsky Act, and Anti-Russian Sanctions_, by Alex Krainer, and he writes:

    During his final trip to Moscow in the [sic] early 1995, Jeffrey Sachs himself warned Western officials about this blatantly corrupt scheme, but it appeared that none were moved by his warnings.
     
    So it seems Sachs was well-meaning even then.

    Replies: @Wizard of Oz, @Antiwar7

    Krainer further states:

    When Jeffrey Sachs drafted his shock therapy recommendations, he estimated that for the reforms to succeed, Soviet Union would need financial support of about $15 billion per year for many years.

    Obviously, that aid was not forthcoming. Krainer also writes that Sachs advocated for debt relief for Russia, something that Sachs had helped obtain for Poland (50% relief) and Bolivia (90% relief). On the contrary, the G7 threatened Russia with food aid cutoff if government debt service was interrupted at all.

    So Sachs looks moral and caring even then, and the piratical, evil West looks evil, even then.

    • Agree: AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @Hunsdon
    @Antiwar7

    Thank you for the information about Jeffrey Sachs. I had mostly lumped him into the "gang of looters" group, and will look into Krainer's book.

    , @Ron Unz
    @Antiwar7


    Obviously, that aid was not forthcoming. Krainer also writes that Sachs advocated for debt relief for Russia, something that Sachs had helped obtain for Poland (50% relief) and Bolivia (90% relief). On the contrary, the G7 threatened Russia with food aid cutoff if government debt service was interrupted at all.

    So Sachs looks moral and caring even then, and the piratical, evil West looks evil, even then.
     
    Thanks for the information, which doesn't really surprise me. I'd asked a couple of people whose views I trust, and they seemed to have a good opinion of Sachs. Also, he came across as quite sincere in those video interviews, including when he personally raised the Russian privatization issue.

    I was also surprised that he seemed to say nice things about Naomi Klein, even though she'd portrayed him as a leading villain in her book.

    Replies: @Wizard of Oz, @AlexanderEngUK

  • I spent most of the 1990s heavily involved in politics and political campaigns, often working closely with individuals quite active in conservative and Republican Party circles, and became friendly with many of them. Bill Clinton was President during those years, and I never had strong feelings about him one way or the other, agreeing with...
  • @eudion2
    Viewed from the potential impact it will have on future generations, perhaps the biggest scandal of the Clinton Administration is how the collapse of the Soviet Union was transformed from an opportunity for Cold War conciliation into an asset-stripping free-for-all that placed tens of millions of Russians into destitution and brought us to the current not-so-cold Cold War II era.

    In the 1990s, Jeffery Sachs was a prominent figure in the wealth transfer from the Russian people to their Wall-Street funded oligarchs. I hope to see him someday repudiate his involvement. Until then, I have misgivings about his sudden rise as a spokesperson against Covid policy and the war in Ukraine, usurping the prominence of others who were consistently on the side of truth.

    His ideological trajectory strikes me as similar to how certain Jewish Marxists suddenly had a mass ideological conversion to become leaders of the 'neoconservative' movement when it became clear that Marxism in America was going nowhere, and thus today it appears that the conservative movement has erased the reputation of its organic past leaders and has been commandeered by former Marxists. Likewise, while I admit that I was young and apolitical during the Vietnam War years, I cannot remember ever hearing about Noam Chomsky as a leading figure of the anti-war movement, and yet that's exactly how he's portrayed as today he supports the official government line in everything from 911 to Covid.

    Bottom line: The past is being retconned all the time. And kids, you don't know the half of it.

    Replies: @Steve in Dallas

    Regarding Jeffrey Sachs morphing into a ‘good guy’… I too have had a really hard time believing such a senior ‘bad guy’, who surely knew precisely what he was doing in 1990’s Russia, could change his stripes so completely…

    This recent article (posted last weekend at lewrockwell.com) suggests that Jeffrey Sachs’ recent activities are as malevolently motivated as ever… a must read…

    https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/drastic-founder-renounces-lab-leak?utm_source=cross-post&publication_id=834349&post_id=89064796&isFreemail=true&utm_campaign=677727&utm_medium=email

    • Troll: AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @Ron Unz
    @Steve in Dallas


    Regarding Jeffrey Sachs morphing into a ‘good guy’… I too have had a really hard time believing such a senior ‘bad guy’, who surely knew precisely what he was doing in 1990’s Russia, could change his stripes so completely…
     
    That issue about Sachs has come up several times before, and having now watched several of his long interviews, including his discussion of his 1990s activities in Russia, he seems quite sincere to me and makes a plausible case that he was unfairly blamed for Russia's economic disaster. The Russians themselves certainly seem to agree, since they regularly quote him in very respectful terms in their leading media outlets.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmOePNsNFw0&t=780s

    I remember that Sachs had been a leading villain of Naomi Klein's very popular book and was also a major figure in that Nation article, and once accusations get into widespread circulation, they can hang around forever, even if they turn out to be mistaken.

    Here are a couple of other references someone else provided:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/world-war-iii-and-world-war-ii/?showcomments#comment-5654422

    https://www.unz.com/runz/world-war-iii-and-world-war-ii/?showcomments#comment-5654488

    Replies: @Wizard of Oz, @QCIC, @Steve in Dallas, @Wizard of Oz

  • @Complex Pseudonymic Handle
    @old coyote


    JFK jr.s death is another mysterious one: strange how it happened shortly after his magazine “George” published a lengthy article on the early upbringing and life of ‘slick Willy’.
     
    At the time it was noised about that he might run for the senate seat to be vacated by retiring incumbent Daniel Patrick Moynihan.

    Hillary Rodham Clinton won that race.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @SunBakedSuburb

    “Hillary Rodham Clinton won that race.”

    Hillary began her side career as a CIA asset whilst serving as a staff lawyer for the House Judiciary Committee investigating Watergate. Democratic lawyer Jerry Zeifman, in charge of the investigation, recommended her removal from staff due to “corrupt and unethical behavior.” Speculation posits she was collecting blackmail dirt that came in the huge haul of documents and reports related to the periphery of the Watergate investigation from the DOJ, FBI, Capitol Police. Specifically, information related to pedophilia. A subject that comes up again in reports from her time as Obama’s Secretary of State when it is known that she personally supervised a DC prostitution ring catering to visiting foreign dignitaries who had a taste for young flesh.

    Hillary’s relationship to the Podesta brothers — still powerful DC lobbyists — generated a lot of grist for the conspiracy mill during Trump’s administration. The Podestas are well known for their taste in art that features images of tortured children and cannibalism. Through a series of leaked texts, Tony Podesta is directly linked to a woman, whose name currently escapes me, a member of Hillary’s inner circle, who operated what can only be described as a bordello for elite DC customers interested in children located in rural Maryland.

    Recently, Tony Podesta’s niece, Lesley, quit her position at Twitter during the Musk purge. What was her position at Twitter? A member of the Trust and Safety Council, the bailiwick of which was monitoring and eliminating content that dealt with child abuse and pedophilia.

    Any research into the 1990s parapolitics scene is going to include a large helping of Hillary. She was the queen (of blood) behind the scene.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    @SunBakedSuburb


    Any research into the 1990s parapolitics scene is going to include a large helping of Hillary. She was the queen (of blood) behind the scene.
     
    Agreed! Is the name you couldn't recall Huma Abedin?

    Bill Clinton was no slouch himself. Mr. Unz here discounts whatever he has not read about, but 20 years ago a former Arkansas State Trooper told me how real the "stories" of Arkanacide were. It helps to talk to real people, some of whom one can trust.
  • President Donald Trump claimed last week that the US and Britain had won World War II. This was a shameless lie and distortion of the facts. Many Americans and Canadians like to believe their nations won the war in Europe and give insufficient recognition to the decisive Soviet role. Most Europeans would rather not think...
  • Ahem says:

    Yes, Trump’s claim was based on his near complete ignorance of what happened in WWII. However, a quote from Nikita Khrushchev’s memoirs should also be taken into account by Mr. Margolis:

    “I would like to express my candid opinion about Stalin’s views on whether the Red Army and the Soviet Union could have coped with Nazi Germany and survived the war without aid from the United States and Britain. First, I would like to tell about some remarks Stalin made and repeated several times when we were “discussing freely” among ourselves. He stated bluntly that if the United States had not helped us, we would not have won the war. If we had had to fight Nazi Germany one on one, we could not have stood up against Germany’s pressure, and we would have lost the war. No one ever discussed this subject officially, and I don’t think Stalin left any written evidence of his opinion, but I will state here that several times in conversations with me he noted that these were the actual circumstances. He never made a special point of holding a conversation on the subject, but when we were engaged in some kind of relaxed conversation, going over international questions of the past and present, and when we would return to the subject of the path we had traveled during the war, that is what he said. When I listened to his remarks, I was fully in agreement with him, and today I am even more so.”

    The number of Lend Lease transport vehicles alone, about 11,000, capable of handling the Soviet Union’s terrible road system were of great significance in that without them Soviet ground forces would be incapable of engaging anything resembling a war of maneuver.

    • Agree: Oikeamielinen
    • Thanks: AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @anon
    @Ahem


    The number of Lend Lease transport vehicles alone, about 11,000, capable of handling the Soviet Union’s terrible road system were of great significance in that without them Soviet ground forces would be incapable of engaging anything resembling a war of maneuver.
     
    Having been to East Germany and spoken to people there that experienced its handover to the USSR first hand, I can tell you this is complete BS. They told me the Americans left with their trucks and jeeps and the Soviet Army came in with their horses and wagons

    The Second World War was a war of attrition, and Germany simply did not have the resources or manpower to outlast the USSR. Once German troops were stopped before Moscow, it was only a question of time.

    Replies: @Ahem, @Obama's boyfriend

    , @SBaker
    @Ahem

    Perhaps you forgot the little Plutonium bomb thing. How many would have gone pop over a few German cities?

  • Seeing as Germany posed no threat to either Britain or the USA, their participation at all was ill-advised, at least. I recall James Burnham’s satirical description of America’s WWII crusade: “A war against totalitarianism in alliance with the principal totalitarian power.”

    • LOL: ruralguy
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Dutch Boy

    US/British neutrality would have led to some interesting consequences, depending on when it would have been exercised. This discussion will assume that Suvorov's assertions are correct. If you disagree, please at least look at Viktor Suvorov's address to the US Naval Academy (see youtube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hLc53JhyFcU and others)

    Prior to the partition of Poland:
    Germany does not annex Poland, but does make it a neutral buffer state. Germany becomes dominant industrial power in Europe (as it is now). USSR does not invade Europe, fails as the arms produced by the USSR's wartime economy (see Suvorov, _The Chief Culprit_) cannot be used. British Empire is probably not shared with Germany, but does fail as UK economy is displaced by German and US production and UK social revolution destroys UK aristocracy and manufacturing. We get something like the modern world.

    After the partition of Poland:
    After France falls, either (a) Germany attacks USSR first (actual history) or (b) USSR attacks Germany first (a three week advance in the USSR's planned invasion date in our history would have made (b) true (see Suvorov, above).
    In either (a) or (b), the USSR advances to the English Channel.
    In case (a) the USSR is exhausted, the more so as attrition would have been far worse if German forces had not been diverted to the Allied front in Western Europe. the US controls all of Korea, and the KMT quite likely wins in China.
    In case (b), USSR casualties are minimal. It is unclear what Stalin planned should his invasion have succeeded as was planned -- in practice, Western Europe would probably have been treated as Eastern Europe was in our history, and the USSR would have been belicose but not expansionary while absorbing Western Europe. The US wins its war with Japan, but the USSR and the PRC get the East Asia mainland.
    We get the power blocs of Orwell's _1984_, possibly without EastAsia, about like we have today (with a very weak Eurasia, the EU, and a very strong EastAsia, the PRC, and a dominant Ociania (US), and a Third World dominated by economics rather than military force).

    Difficult to say what happens after that. The West might have avoided its current fall, but probably not. 30 years of mechanized warfare including one long truce (1914-1945) had killed off most of those who wanted to continue fighting, and the surviving bellicose leadership was (in our history and probably the alternate histories above) not replaced by another bellicose leadership. We'd probably have had an interval much like in our history -- exhausted low level conflict while it became obvious how much damage and injury the World Wars had inflicted to the industrialized nations, and how little Imperial government (US, UK, USSR, China's government of either PRC or KMT) could do to repair it.

    And we end up about where we are today. Interesting conclusion to the thought exercise. I'm essentially assuming that the damage done, the casualties, and the effect of damage and casualties on generally received truth among coherent populations,throughout the world is the important part of WW II. Nobody wanted to start another central war. The rest was apparently window dressing.

    , @Glinka
    @Dutch Boy

    Remember Finland was an axis ally of Hitler during his attack of the SU. The Finns were especially useful during the siege of Leningrad. A siege that caused the death of at least one million soviet civilians. And Finland was supposedly a parliamentary democracy.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @anonymous1963

  • In mid-March, the Wall Street Journal carried a long discussion of the origins of the Bretton Woods system, the international financial framework that governed the Western world for decades after World War II. A photo showed the two individuals who negotiated that agreement. Britain was represented by John Maynard Keynes, a towering economic figure of...
  • Jon,
    just because you don’t remember where you were in re: Enron, doesn’t make it less important. obviously lives lost are more important in reality and memories, but that isn’t what Krugman or Unz’s point is about

    • Agree: AlexanderEngUK
  • During the long Cold War many Russians grew sufficiently disenchanted with the lies and omissions of their own news outlets that they turned to Western radio for a glimpse of the truth. The growth of the Internet has now provided Americans with a similar opportunity to click on a foreign website and discover the important...
  • @Anonymous
    Patton was a virulent anti-Semite and Nazi sympathizer. He was planning to go on record and publicly deny the Holocaust and was assassinated as a result:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/08/sunday-review/surviving-the-nazis-only-to-be-jailed-by-america.html

    As I examined the path the Nazis took out of Europe, I struggled to understand how so many of them had made it to America so easily while so many Holocaust survivors were left behind.

    One answer came in a copy of Gen. George S. Patton’s handwritten journal. In one entry from 1945, Patton, who oversaw the D.P. operations for the United States, seethed after reading Harrison’s findings, which he saw — quite accurately — as an attack on his own command.

    “Harrison and his ilk believe that the Displaced Person is a human being, which he is not, and this applies particularly to the Jews who are lower than animals,” Patton wrote. He complained of how the Jews in one camp, with “no sense of human relationships,” would defecate on the floors and live in filth like lazy “locusts,” and he told of taking his commander, Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower, to tour a makeshift synagogue set up to commemorate the holy day of Yom Kippur.

    “We entered the synagogue, which was packed with the greatest stinking mass of humanity I have ever seen,” Patton wrote. “Of course, I have seen them since the beginning and marveled that beings alleged to be made in the form of God can look the way they do or act the way they act.”

    Other evidence emerged revealing not only Patton’s disdain for the Jews in the camps, but an odd admiration for the Nazi prisoners of war under his watch.

    Under Patton, Nazis prisoners were not only bunked at times with Jewish survivors, but were even allowed to hold positions of authority, despite orders from Eisenhower to “de-Nazify” the camps. “Listen,” Patton told one of his officers of the Nazis, “if you need these men, keep them and don’t worry about anything else.”
     

    Replies: @Quartermaster, @Astuteobservor II, @Rehmat, @Anonymous, @Israel Shamir, @Truth, @ohmy

    Whoever killed Patton (the Russians or the Americans) did a good thing – otherwise there would be a USSR-US war in 1945, as Churchill wanted and demanded. If Patton would get to power, he and Churchill would unleash the most horrible war. Mind you, many Russian soldiers and officers of that time thought it would be good to fight to the very end and place the Red banner on the Capitol Hill. The Red Army was very strong then. So it was good to get rid of Patton and bring peace. Naturally kudos to Ron Unz for uncovering the story!

    • Troll: AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @Rurik
    @Israel Shamir


    So it was good to get rid of Patton and bring peace.
     
    well, with all due respect sir, I disagree

    Eastern Europe was handed over to a mortal fiend who crushed their spirit (the ones he didn't murder outright) and enslaved them for generations

    (if communism isn't slavery, I don't know what it is. What is slavery if not having every aspect of your life controlled and being forced to toil for the benefit of others?)

    and the effects of that terrible war(s) are even being felt today, as the Fiend is marching NATO right up to the Russian bear, and forcing a conflict.

    it would have been well for the world for men like Patton to throttle Stalin's goons and to speak out and question what was done to Europe and for whom. If Patton were at Yalta, would all of those heroic men who fought to keep the Red Army from ravaging their lands have been Keelhauled? I don't think so.

    the events of WWII and how that contrived, Satanic apocalypse changed the world and set in motion the way things are today, deserves a lot of scrutiny, if you ask me. But rather we're all supposed to believe as fact the narrative that has slithered out of the bowels of the winning side, where it's been turned into a cartoon-like conflict with one side being considered the epitome of evil and the other side as virtuous, valiant and heroic as man has ever been.

    Nothing could be further from the truth.

    There was massive good and massive evil on both sides, and a man like Patton might have helped to make us all understand that a little better. And that would have been a good thing.

    IMHO.

    Replies: @George, @NoseytheDuke

    , @The Alarmist
    @Israel Shamir

    I doubt the Red Army would have bothered to cross the Channel, much less the Atlantic, but the rest of Western Europe would have been in play and fairly easy pickings for the Red Army.

    The next question this raises is, "If France had been occupied by the Red Army after WWII, would you be able to tell the difference today?"

    Replies: @Anonym

    , @George
    @Israel Shamir

    Patton's reputation was not that good.

    Patton sends Jewish commander on deranged suicide mission, which did not make it into the movie:

    Task Force Baum was a secret and controversial World War II task force set up by U.S. Army general George S. Patton and commanded by Capt. Abraham Baum in late March 1945. Baum was given the task of penetrating 50 miles (80 km) behind German lines and liberating the POWs in camp OFLAG XIII-B, near Hammelburg. Controversy surrounds the true reasons behind the mission, which may have been simply to liberate Patton's son-in-law, John K. Waters, taken captive in Tunisia in 1943. The result of the mission was a complete failure;

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Task_Force_Baum

    Patton was no George C Scott.

    Actual Voice of General Patton starting at 1:15 vs. Hollywood - ...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4_47O2Pfy8

    Replies: @Uebersetzer

  • @Anonymous
    Patton was a virulent anti-Semite and Nazi sympathizer. He was planning to go on record and publicly deny the Holocaust and was assassinated as a result:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/08/sunday-review/surviving-the-nazis-only-to-be-jailed-by-america.html

    As I examined the path the Nazis took out of Europe, I struggled to understand how so many of them had made it to America so easily while so many Holocaust survivors were left behind.

    One answer came in a copy of Gen. George S. Patton’s handwritten journal. In one entry from 1945, Patton, who oversaw the D.P. operations for the United States, seethed after reading Harrison’s findings, which he saw — quite accurately — as an attack on his own command.

    “Harrison and his ilk believe that the Displaced Person is a human being, which he is not, and this applies particularly to the Jews who are lower than animals,” Patton wrote. He complained of how the Jews in one camp, with “no sense of human relationships,” would defecate on the floors and live in filth like lazy “locusts,” and he told of taking his commander, Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower, to tour a makeshift synagogue set up to commemorate the holy day of Yom Kippur.

    “We entered the synagogue, which was packed with the greatest stinking mass of humanity I have ever seen,” Patton wrote. “Of course, I have seen them since the beginning and marveled that beings alleged to be made in the form of God can look the way they do or act the way they act.”

    Other evidence emerged revealing not only Patton’s disdain for the Jews in the camps, but an odd admiration for the Nazi prisoners of war under his watch.

    Under Patton, Nazis prisoners were not only bunked at times with Jewish survivors, but were even allowed to hold positions of authority, despite orders from Eisenhower to “de-Nazify” the camps. “Listen,” Patton told one of his officers of the Nazis, “if you need these men, keep them and don’t worry about anything else.”
     

    Replies: @Quartermaster, @Astuteobservor II, @Rehmat, @Anonymous, @Israel Shamir, @Truth, @ohmy

    Quoting THE JEW YORK TIMES as a reliable source is just like believing that the Grand Mufti of Palestine twisted Hitler’s arms to carry-out genocide of non-Zionist European Jews.

    https://rehmat1.com/2015/10/22/netanyahu-absolves-hitler-of-holocaust/

    • Agree: AlexanderEngUK
  • Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Patton was a virulent anti-Semite and Nazi sympathizer. He was planning to go on record and publicly deny the Holocaust and was assassinated as a result:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/08/sunday-review/surviving-the-nazis-only-to-be-jailed-by-america.html

    As I examined the path the Nazis took out of Europe, I struggled to understand how so many of them had made it to America so easily while so many Holocaust survivors were left behind.

    One answer came in a copy of Gen. George S. Patton’s handwritten journal. In one entry from 1945, Patton, who oversaw the D.P. operations for the United States, seethed after reading Harrison’s findings, which he saw — quite accurately — as an attack on his own command.

    “Harrison and his ilk believe that the Displaced Person is a human being, which he is not, and this applies particularly to the Jews who are lower than animals,” Patton wrote. He complained of how the Jews in one camp, with “no sense of human relationships,” would defecate on the floors and live in filth like lazy “locusts,” and he told of taking his commander, Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower, to tour a makeshift synagogue set up to commemorate the holy day of Yom Kippur.

    “We entered the synagogue, which was packed with the greatest stinking mass of humanity I have ever seen,” Patton wrote. “Of course, I have seen them since the beginning and marveled that beings alleged to be made in the form of God can look the way they do or act the way they act.”

    Other evidence emerged revealing not only Patton’s disdain for the Jews in the camps, but an odd admiration for the Nazi prisoners of war under his watch.

    Under Patton, Nazis prisoners were not only bunked at times with Jewish survivors, but were even allowed to hold positions of authority, despite orders from Eisenhower to “de-Nazify” the camps. “Listen,” Patton told one of his officers of the Nazis, “if you need these men, keep them and don’t worry about anything else.”

    • Troll: AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @Quartermaster
    @Anonymous

    Patton was neither a Nazi sympathizer (he loved France), nor an anti-Semite, virulent or otherwise. Both are post war smears of Patton, and neither were true.

    Replies: @Wally

    , @Astuteobservor II
    @Anonymous

    so someone who had brains and the courage to stand up. what did he get in return? assassination attempts and a final successful one.

    I am just glad that in the internet + smartphone age, assassinations are no longer possible.

    to be honest, america reaped the benefits of 2 world wars waiting till the very end to join both. patton was jeopardizing all of it. why would the people in control allow it :( I am surprised patton didn't take better measures to protect himself. he was up against people who started and finished 2 world wars just for the very power(national interest) he tried to negate.

    Replies: @guest, @Eileen Kuch

    , @Rehmat
    @Anonymous

    Quoting THE JEW YORK TIMES as a reliable source is just like believing that the Grand Mufti of Palestine twisted Hitler's arms to carry-out genocide of non-Zionist European Jews.

    https://rehmat1.com/2015/10/22/netanyahu-absolves-hitler-of-holocaust/

    , @Anonymous
    @Anonymous

    Patton said we fought the wrong enemy we should have fought the Russians and that the Germans were the only decent people left in Europe after the war. He figured out the real game of the traitors and was going to come back and become President and root them out so they killed him. Douglas Bazatta OSS confessed in 1974 to a room full of witnesses that Wild Bill Donovan hired him to murder Patton. Here we are at the beginning of WW III just as planned, so a bunch of demon possessed- Christ hating trash- can have their world supremacy and the ultimate Bolshevik promise of a planet full of dead goys and all the property of the world in their hands. Patton's death was a great tragedy for humanity. Wailing and gnashing you bastards, that's what awaits you murdering, perverted cosmic trash. Real Catholic or Hell, make the choice.

    , @Israel Shamir
    @Anonymous

    Whoever killed Patton (the Russians or the Americans) did a good thing - otherwise there would be a USSR-US war in 1945, as Churchill wanted and demanded. If Patton would get to power, he and Churchill would unleash the most horrible war. Mind you, many Russian soldiers and officers of that time thought it would be good to fight to the very end and place the Red banner on the Capitol Hill. The Red Army was very strong then. So it was good to get rid of Patton and bring peace. Naturally kudos to Ron Unz for uncovering the story!

    Replies: @Rurik, @The Alarmist, @George

    , @Truth
    @Anonymous

    Elite Jewry is responsible for both world wars and any student of history is aware of this. Patton wasn't an antisemite, he just called it like he saw it. There are more Jews in America then anywhere else in the world. They came to America in droves, right before the war started. People are sick of the so-called "chosen" people, with their greed and hatred for all other races, calling us "goyim" and believing we will be their slaves after their "Antichrist" Messiah arrives.

    There was no Jewish holocaust but there was a German and Christian Holocaust. Over 60 million Christians were murdered during WWI and WWII, yet we have no museums or memorials for our dead, not like the jew does (in foreign countries in which people don't care about the jews anyhow). Every single day we have to read or hear of some article or movie about the jews and their suffering under the "evil" Nazis.

    People are waking up and they are becoming angry.

    Replies: @Corvinus

    , @ohmy
    @Anonymous

    To read a record of who FDR really was and, Truman too, one should read Major Jordan's Diary, It's available free of charge in PDf form on the net. Go through the first 150 pages, you will discover many interesting facts concerning Jews in our government who with the knowledge and consent of FDR facilitated the transfer to Stalin's Russia, not only our nuclear research secrets from the Manhattan Project but enormous amounts of cash. What does it have to do with General Patton? You figure it out. Patton was a true Patriot. Not many like him today.

  • Establishment historians claim that U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt never wanted war and made every reasonable effort to prevent war. This article will show that contrary to what establishment historians claim, Franklin Roosevelt and his administration wanted war and made every effort to instigate World War II in Europe. The Germans seized a mass of...
  • @Sean

    He said Chamberlain’s position in 1938 was that England had nothing with which to fight and that she could not risk going to war with Hitler. Kennedy’s view: That Hitler would have fought Russia without any later conflict with England if it had not been for Bullitt’s urging on Roosevelt in the summer of 1939 that the Germans must be faced down about Poland
     
    Stalin understood that he was freeing Hitler to strike in the west by making a pact with Hitler. In effect he facilitated it. The British considered the Soviet Union to be the real problem. Stalin had already grabbed the Baltic states plus parts of Finland and Romania. The British were mobilizing against the USSR over the war with Finland even after declaring war with Germany. The British guarantee to Poland originally covered only their independence not territory; the British thought allowing Germany to take Polish land was acceptable and it would make war between Germany and the USSR quite likely (Chamberlain’s strategy was to let Hitler and Stalin into conflict). Only after the Nazi-Soviet Pact was announced was the guarantee extended to Poland's territory because at that point the British decided war was necessary; Germany and the USSR being friendly was not acceptable as it meant Hitler was going to go West instead of East.

    Clearly Stalin wanted to sit the war between the capitalists out and reap the rewards. Neville Chamberlain wanted to see the fighting done by the Germans and Bolshies, we know he thought that because he said so to a meeting of important Tories.With the the Nazi-Soviet pact the powerful Soviet deterrent to any aggression was out of the equation and the British realized the balance of power had moved against them, which was unacceptable in a way that war between the Nazis and Soviets was not. If Hitler didn’t have to worry about the Soviets at his back that suddenly made all the previous calculations obsolete.

    Although Stalin may have anticipated territorial demands or military pressure such as border incidents he was astounded when Hitler subjected the USSR to an all out attack with the promethean goal of conquering the Soviet state. Everybody underestimated the effectiveness of the combination of Weimar reforms increasing centralised revenue raising for military purposes, Hitler's decisiveness and the German army’s fighting power.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @AlexanderEngUK

    It’s well-established that Russia was intending to attack Germany and perhaps other parts or all of Western Europe in 1941, in fact it’s fairly likely Stalin had been intending to attack Germany from 1939 and possibly from as far back as the mid 1930s.

    Germany became certain in the second half of 1940 that Russia was going to attack them. By the start of Germany’s Operation Barbarossa (invasion of Russia) in June 1941, Russia had trained the amazing number of 1 million paratroopers (offensive troops) and had built hundreds of forward air bases (offensive air bases) along their border with Germany, and was almost ready to invade Germany. Essentially, what happened was that Germany narrowly beat Russia to the punch.

    For more details on Russia initiating the war on the Eastern Front, read this great article on this website by Laurent Guyénot – https://www.unz.com/article/barbarossa-suvorovs-revisionism-goes-mainstream/, which is a review of Sean McMeekin’s book, Stalin’s War, the book can be purchased at https://www.amazon.com/Stalins-War-New-History-World/dp/1541672798.

  • He said Chamberlain’s position in 1938 was that England had nothing with which to fight and that she could not risk going to war with Hitler. Kennedy’s view: That Hitler would have fought Russia without any later conflict with England if it had not been for Bullitt’s urging on Roosevelt in the summer of 1939 that the Germans must be faced down about Poland

    Stalin understood that he was freeing Hitler to strike in the west by making a pact with Hitler. In effect he facilitated it. The British considered the Soviet Union to be the real problem. Stalin had already grabbed the Baltic states plus parts of Finland and Romania. The British were mobilizing against the USSR over the war with Finland even after declaring war with Germany. The British guarantee to Poland originally covered only their independence not territory; the British thought allowing Germany to take Polish land was acceptable and it would make war between Germany and the USSR quite likely (Chamberlain’s strategy was to let Hitler and Stalin into conflict). Only after the Nazi-Soviet Pact was announced was the guarantee extended to Poland’s territory because at that point the British decided war was necessary; Germany and the USSR being friendly was not acceptable as it meant Hitler was going to go West instead of East.

    Clearly Stalin wanted to sit the war between the capitalists out and reap the rewards. Neville Chamberlain wanted to see the fighting done by the Germans and Bolshies, we know he thought that because he said so to a meeting of important Tories.With the the Nazi-Soviet pact the powerful Soviet deterrent to any aggression was out of the equation and the British realized the balance of power had moved against them, which was unacceptable in a way that war between the Nazis and Soviets was not. If Hitler didn’t have to worry about the Soviets at his back that suddenly made all the previous calculations obsolete.

    Although Stalin may have anticipated territorial demands or military pressure such as border incidents he was astounded when Hitler subjected the USSR to an all out attack with the promethean goal of conquering the Soviet state. Everybody underestimated the effectiveness of the combination of Weimar reforms increasing centralised revenue raising for military purposes, Hitler’s decisiveness and the German army’s fighting power.

    • Disagree: AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Sean

    Now THAT makes perfect sense! Kudos!

    , @AlexanderEngUK
    @Sean

    It's well-established that Russia was intending to attack Germany and perhaps other parts or all of Western Europe in 1941, in fact it's fairly likely Stalin had been intending to attack Germany from 1939 and possibly from as far back as the mid 1930s.

    Germany became certain in the second half of 1940 that Russia was going to attack them. By the start of Germany's Operation Barbarossa (invasion of Russia) in June 1941, Russia had trained the amazing number of 1 million paratroopers (offensive troops) and had built hundreds of forward air bases (offensive air bases) along their border with Germany, and was almost ready to invade Germany. Essentially, what happened was that Germany narrowly beat Russia to the punch.

    For more details on Russia initiating the war on the Eastern Front, read this great article on this website by Laurent Guyénot - https://www.unz.com/article/barbarossa-suvorovs-revisionism-goes-mainstream/, which is a review of Sean McMeekin's book, Stalin's War, the book can be purchased at https://www.amazon.com/Stalins-War-New-History-World/dp/1541672798.

  • Priss Factor [AKA "Asagirian"] says: • Website
    @German_reader

    Czechoslovakian President Emil Hácha signed a formal agreement the next day with Hitler establishing a German protectorate over Bohemia and Moravia, which constituted the Czech portion of the previous entity.
     
    It might have had something to do with Hitler's threat to bomb Prague, if Hácha didn't give in to his blackmail.

    It soon became evident after the proclamation of the Protectorate of Bohemia-Moravia that the new regime enjoyed considerable popularity among the people living in it.
     
    Lol. Sure, Czechs must have been thrilled at losing their independence and being occupied by a foreign power, at least some of whose representatives eventually developed extremely sinister plans for the future of Czechs (Heydrich during his time in the protectorate thought that about 50% of Czechs had to be "deported", while 50% could be Germanized, but Czech nationhood had to disappear in any case).
    I don't know why Ron Unz keeps publishing these absolutely retarded "revisionist" pieces which are little more than full-on Nazi apologetics, completely unconvincing in their arguments (the documents cited above are totally unremarkable imo and in no way show Roosevelt "instigated" WW2...it was Hitler's decision to start a war with Poland).

    Replies: @anon, @Wally, @PeterMX, @Priss Factor, @jacques sheete, @Thorfinnsson, @BADmejr, @Hans, @Anonymous

    these absolutely retarded “revisionist” pieces which are little more than full-on Nazi apologetics, completely unconvincing in their arguments (the documents cited above are totally unremarkable imo and in no way show Roosevelt “instigated” WW2…it was Hitler’s decision to start a war with Poland).

    These revisionist pieces are 50% kooky but offer up kernels of facts and insights that reveal aspects of the time mostly buried by the Judeo-centric media. It has elements of Nazi apologia, but keep in mind that much of US narrative is Jewish Supremacist propaganda.

    Now, there is something to be learned from the Jewish Narrative as it isn’t all lies either.

    If we can select the truths from the Jewish Supremacist narrative and truths from the Nazi-sympathizing narrative, we can construct a truer narrative. Of course the lies and distortions of both.

    The recent events in Iraq and Syria and the whole Russia Collusion hysteria go to show that the ‘liberal’corporate media can be just as full of BS as any totalitarian press.
    Of course, the difference is Putin and Assad are NOT Hitlers whereas Hitler was truly a hitler, a pathological demagogue.

    Hitler is mainly to blame for WWII, and one could argue that FDR’s hostility toward Hitler was well-grounded given Hitler’s actions against Poland and then against the USSR, an ally. Also,Hitler was someone with whom diplomacy was often impossible since he regarded the compromise of others as weakness to exploit.

    But it’s also true that the US, for ideological, imperial, and tribal reasons of its own, believed Germany must be toppled first before its preferred world order could prevail.

    • Disagree: AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @jacques sheete
    @Priss Factor


    Hitler is mainly to blame for WWII, and one could argue that FDR’s hostility toward Hitler was well-grounded ...
     
    Hitler was to blame? Tell us about how blameless the Marxist "world revolution" fanatics and their Wall Street backers were. Then you can enlighten us about the Treaty of Versailles and how that played so little part in the ensuing hostilities. Long standing British imperialistic policies? No problem, eh? Zionist intrigue? Never happened, right? (Ever hear of "rabbi" Stephen Wise? G-wd's messenger on Earth, right?)

    This oughta be depressing...

    Replies: @Priss Factor

    , @Wally
    @Priss Factor

    said:
    "These revisionist pieces are 50% kooky but offer up kernels of facts and insights that reveal aspects of the time mostly buried by the Judeo-centric media. It has elements of Nazi apologia, but keep in mind that much of US narrative is Jewish Supremacist propaganda."

    - Tell us specifically what "50%" of Revisionist research is "kooky".

    - What's to apologize for?
    'The Nazis" did not do what is alleged of them and you have no proof they did.

    - Talk is cheap. Empty, Pavlovian talk is all we get from you.

    All that while you "apologize" for Communism & Stalin.

    www.codoh.com

    , @chris
    @Priss Factor


    ... ‘liberal’corporate media can be just as full of BS as any totalitarian press.
     
    except that it's becoming apparent even to the least amongst us, that it's not so much the totalitarian press, which in these instances seems to be 'full of BS,' as the other kind of press seems to be.
    , @ploni almoni
    @Priss Factor

    Too late. You have shown what you really are. Both of you.

  • From Richard Hanania: And this one's not very good: That doesn't sound like me, that sounds like a normie GOP politician.
  • @Ringo_at_Starr Search
    I am curious about the thought processes of so many people who think stereotypes are necessarily wrong.
    (This has been indoctrinated in my generation since grade school in the 1970s.)

    Stereotypes could be wrong, but they are not necessarily wrong.

    The other extreme, as Murray Rothbard (also attributed to others) famously said, that "every stereotype is true", is much more likely to be closer to reality.
    Stereotypes are a more efficient way to deal with life, even if they're occasionally wrong.

    Stereotypical thinking is a product of our evolution, and results from Bayes rule wired into our brains to increase our chances of survival.

    Replies: @Kolya Krassotkin, @Whereismyhandle, @Jonathan Mason, @Dr doomNgloom, @AnotherDad, @Mr. Peabody, @Barnard, @AlexanderEngUK, @Gandydancer, @ADL Pyramid of Hate, @silviosilver

    Sterotypes are the wisdom of the crowd. They’re usually right.

    • Agree: Spud Boy
  • Why did sundown towns exist, daddy? [City Council approves a permanent 10 p.m. curfew for Philly’s teens: If signed by the mayor, the bill would require teenagers 14 to 17 to be home by 10 p.m., and children ages 13 and younger to be home by 9:30., Philadelphia Inquirer, December 1, 2022]: Philadelphia City Council...
  • The things that are done to deal with TNB. My God, it’s so tiresome.

  • Reminds me of when certain shopping malls would ban all teens unless accompanied by an adult because of the dysfunctional behavior of negro teenapers. All non-negro teens had to suffer because of them. Otherwise, the negroes would scream it had disparate impact and was racist and discriminatory because only their little hell spawned demons were affected by the ban. You know, the usual B.S. they spew when held to account for their crappy behavior. As is, if a curfew is needed because of negroes, only negroes should be affected- not Whites/Asians and Hispanics.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
    @Non PC Infidel

    There is a pleasant, well-run amusement park / entertainment complex in a southeastern Michigan suburb that has had trouble with blacks.
    I will not name the venue because it is (still) a nice place to frequent and would be unfair to the owners as they are attempting to maintain a decent decorum for white patrons despite the unruly and violent behavior of blacks.
    Due to problems with blacks, metal detectors have been installed at the entrances with all of the security screeners being black. One one hand, this is a smart move as the blacks who are being screened cannot cry “racism”. On the other hand, seeing ANY blacks in such a nice venue is still problematic.
    Black “children” who run around the complex still harass whites just by their unruly, obnoxious behavior "just because they can".
    Blacks just don’t “belong” there. They should have their own amusement parks / entertainment venues.
    We would all be better off.
    Wherever blacks congregate, they destroy.

    Replies: @Detroit Refugee, @Non PC Infidel, @luludog, @trevor

  • Cage black males under thirty?

    Would that help?

    • Replies: @anarchyst
    @Colin Wright

    Actually, the "University of Corrections" is considered a "stepping stone" to establishing "street cred" in all black communities. Honest blacks are looked down upon for not spending any time in jail or prison.
    Blacks who (attempt to) get a good education and excel in their studies are criticized and accused of "acting white".
    Almost every black aspires to be a "rapper" or "basketball player", other real occupations not being considered.
    A good comparison is blacks being akin to crabs in a bucket. those who attempt to "escape" are "dragged down" by their "peers".
    Blacks are their own worst enemy...

    Replies: @Colin Wright

    , @XBardon Kaldlan
    @Colin Wright

    Or chastity belts for the strong black wahmen!

    , @Cauchemar du Singe
    @Colin Wright

    Hang them.

    Replies: @Colin Wright

  • If you want to make a lot of money like Kanye West, it helps to have a Jewish handler. The downside is that if you say the wrong thing they just might lock you up and send you to Zombieland. So I decided to hire a feline handler instead of a Jewish one. If I...
  • @RoatanBill
    @anarchyst

    If what you say is true, and I have no reason to doubt you, then wouldn't it be a good idea to read the most interesting parts of the Talmud on the radio along with a critique of the various passages? Who would have access to a radio platform to do this, I wonder.

    It seems to me that just reading their holy book out loud would be a service to the community. On the day that show aired, there would be few listeners. But on the following day, the storm over the antisemitism would be ferocious. Think of the publicity and visibility it could give to the show. Who would have the balls to do such a thing?

    Replies: @H. L. M, @anarchyst, @SaHiB

    Yes, it would be a good idea to expose the talmud and jewish supremacy on the radio.
    The problem is gaining a platform.
    A good example of denying the truth was evident on Sean Hannity’s radio show.
    A caller asked Hannity about the deliberate israeli attack on the USS Liberty (AGTR-5) on June 8, 1967. Hannity abruptly cut off the caller and stated: “israel is our friend and never would have done anything like that”. I damn near fell out of my chair when I heard THAT.
    I lost al respect for Hannity after witnessing that…Hannity being a shill for israel.
    Getting a platform is the hard part.
    Best regards,

    • Thanks: AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @RoatanBill
    @anarchyst

    I apologize for using you to actually speak to the author. I guess you missed my less than subtle left handed suggestion that the author has the necessary platform.

    He could invite rabbinical scholars on to the program to provide their interpretation of what the Talmud says. A fair and balanced reading of the Talmud shouldn't be objected to by anyone interested in the truth. Advertising the benefits of judaism via their own teachings to a wider audience is free publicity. Who could be opposed to such an arrangement? /sarc

    , @DanFromCt
    @anarchyst

    One of the most disgraceful things about Hannity is his show’s constant ads pushing Middle America (as opposed to Israel and its fifth column) to pay for the support of our military amputees who lost their limbs fighting for Israel largely thanks to Hannity’s encapsulating the toxic Israeli meme within his flag-waving shtick patriotism designed to recruit those amputees in the first place.

    This man had been getting paid $40 million a year by the Jews to recruit Americans to do the fighting and dying so good Jewish boys need not bother. A few years ago on his Fox News show he said he only wished that Netanyahu could also serve as president of the United States, which is an apt example of Hannity’s idea of being an American.

    Replies: @Prester John

  • After future president Ye walked out of a Tim Pool interview because that beanie faggot just kept pushing him, promoting absurd and debunked theories about the absence of Jewish power, Jews are praising him. The faggot Jew Dave Rubin, who literally kidnapped children to molest and abuse, was among the fans of the kikesucker Pool....
  • @RedpilledAF
    There are weird things going on regarding the Talmudists and public opinion. Some are waking up, but many are "rethinking" or just doubling down on "antisemitism." Even Ron Unz is walking back from Jewish responsibility in WW1. I have seen many self-professed leftists also back up, or just completely drop, the Israel/Zionist and Palestine issue as they regurgitate propaganda about Russia and Iran over the last few months. It seems oddly coordinated.

    Replies: @Wade

    Technically, Ron Unz argued that Zionists didn’t have enough power to influence the world leaders into WWI. He is of course using a far less expansive definition of “zionist” than some people do. For example, many call the Jewish bankers who helped create the Federal Reserve “zionists”. The more rigorous definition of “zionism” as a political movement just refers to the desire to create a homeland for the jews. I hadn’t realized it, but Jacob Schiff wasn’t a zionist in the strict political sense of the term.

    Nowhere did Ron deny that men like Schiff or Rothschild had enough power to sway political decision making. He just didn’t find any evidence of that in the study he did.

    Zionism is a movement. Schiff and Rothschild were individual men. It’s much easier to witness or provide evidence for/against a political ideology’s impact on the decision making of governments because an ideology is necessarily on everyone’s lips so to speak.

    However, individual men like Schiff and Rothschild could have hidden agendas that go beyond overt political ideologies. For example, they may have wanted the US to enter the war on the side of the allies after the Bolshevik revolution had successfully ended the Czarist regime because, absent the Czarist regime, they were more than happy to see the Kaiser go too and now considered a German loss to be the desirable outcome. This wasn’t the object of Zionism.

    I brought this issue up in a comment to his latest piece that he may be too narrowly focused on Zionism but he didn’t respond. On the other hand, I didn’t bring any actual evidence to back up my speculations so there’s that…

    • Thanks: AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @RedpilledAF
    @Wade

    An element of the overall argument was that there was a lack of Jewish influence, Zionist or otherwise, in the events of WWI. He pointed out the overestimation, or lack of influence, of Jewish financiers and Zionists. In the article, but more in the comments section, he downplayed or denied a lot of their actions and intentions.

  • On Monday, Ye appeared with Nick and Milo on Tim Pool’s podcast, “The Timcast.” The interview was cut shot very early on after Tim Pool kept doing the “pushing back” bullshit. Ye said he wasn’t going to do another Lex Fridman humiliation ritual, and he got up and walked out. It’s really just ridiculous that...
  • @Brooklyn Dave
    The Jews have promoted this idea that an interview needs to “push back,” and this is total anathema to traditional interview journalism, which was about getting the perspective of the interviewee, not about the host airing his own opinions.

    Exactly. Thanks for the clarification on Pool. I enjoy him on other topics, etc. but thanks for putting me wise to him on the JQ.

    Replies: @Sir Launcelot Canning, @CelestiaQuesta, @Derer

    When it all comes down to ‘do we live or die’, Chris Pool will be standing with Jews chanting ‘die Goyim die’.

    • Replies: @P. Cleburne
    @CelestiaQuesta

    Tim, not chris but your point was made.

  • Good move to walk out. “Timmy” was the one with egg on his face and he was exposed as a squirming worm.

    • Agree: AlexanderEngUK
  • From Foreign Policy: It’s Africa’s Century—for Better or Worse Asia gets the attention, but the real economic revolution is the inevitable growth of an overlooked continent. MAY 13, 2022, 3:49 AM Adam Tooze is a columnist at Foreign Policy and a history professor and director of the European Institute at Columbia University. His latest book...
  • Sub-Saharan Africa shows the problem with the idea that the current and foreseeable mixes of populations which he lump together as “humanity” have the potential to build a technologically competent global civilization which could colonize the rest of the solar system, like we see in science fiction.

    Sorry, “humanity” simply lacks that potential, not when the world’s median IQ falls into the low 80’s, with downward pressure on that figure as the world fills up with useless blacks. Billions of people on this planet belong in an economy of stoop labor, at best, not in a cognitive economy based on a generous supply of quality human minds which can acquire constructive habits, benefit from studying STEM subjects and know how to solve problems like white people have done considerably better than average over our history (because in its actual usage lately, the adjective “white” has started to mean something like “competent”).

  • @Altai
    To use Starlink you need a special set of equipment from Starlink which only some people in really rural areas that don't have and are unlikely to get anytime soon good hard connections or real techies in cities would have had in anticipation of service beginning prior to the invasion. The internet didn't go out in Ukraine because the Russian's didn't cut it.

    But generally the future belongs to whomever keeps their Nigerian diaspora to as low a level as possible when the big push comes. Immigration begets more immigration.

    Replies: @Altai, @YetAnotherAnon

    The only thing that ever stops mass migration, other than law is the hesitancy of moving to a truly alien place. In reality most immigrants aren’t bracing pioneers but droll followers who gladly stick to the paths blazed by previous cohorts of their co-ethnics who, in their new context of being a minority is a largely alien land become the focus of their lives.

    I remember watching a documentary about sub-Saharan asylum seekers in Argentina and I laughed out loud when one guy left the DNC ‘to escape political persecution’ and immediately just became an immigrant and ethnic activist… Seems he forgot about whatever cause he was supposedly advocating for back home now he was safe to do so…

    The guy in question appears at 2.38 but the introduction is worth listening to. If only for the line ‘it has even been said that Argentina is more racially European than immigrant-saturated Europe’. The most important graph in the world has consequences for more than just the West.

    The overflow will flow into a lot of countries we traditionally don’t think as being wealthy enough to attract African asylum seekers. Also a growing number are now present in Russia. As in Poland the nucleus was foreign students but over time it’s has grown with visa overstays forming communities.

    This is ultimately a form of human flood management. But there is huge hope because just like water stopping at a wall of sandbags, so too do people trying to essentially get something for nothing stop when faced with even a little bit of even a relative barrier. It’s actually practically really easy to control immigration, this is the element of the whole debate that gets overlooked rhetorically. It’s actually really easy. These immigrants are not formidable they just sense weakness. What is hard to find in the West today is merely the will.

    • Agree: notsaying
    • Thanks: AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @jb
    @Altai


    What is hard to find in the West today is merely the will.
     
    One of the arguments immigration advocates have made for years is that the pressures driving migrants to seek better lives are so intense that there is nothing Western countries can do to stem the flow, so we should instead be looking for ways to accommodate it. Yet the flow dropped significantly after Trump was elected, before he even had a chance to do anything other than talk shit. So yes, it really is that easy -- all you have to do is look at them funny and most will stop coming. (Imagine if Trump had actually been an effective president!)

    Replies: @Altai

  • OT. Is the UK unique in declassifying so much government stuff after 50 years? I imagine the CIA stuff is under wraps, or am I wrong?

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/may/14/secret-british-black-propaganda-campaign-targeted-cold-war-enemies-information-research-department

    The Information Research Department (IRD) was set up by the post-second world war Labour government to counter Soviet propaganda attacks on Britain. Its activities mirrored the CIA’s cold war propaganda operations and the extensive efforts of the USSR and its satellites.

    The Observer last year revealed the IRD’s major campaign in Indonesia in 1965 that helped encourage anti-communist massacres which left hundreds of thousands dead (a link to Obama’s dad there?). There, the IRD prepared pamphlets purporting to be written by Indonesian patriots, but in fact were created by British propagandists, calling on Indonesians to eliminate the PKI, then the biggest communist party in the non-communist world.

    But the thousands of declassified documents studied by Cormac give by far the most extensive insight yet into the IRD’s disinformation operations.

    “The British were only one actor among many, and a fairly minor actor too, compared with the quantity of material being produced and disseminated by the bigger players,” said Cormac, professor of international relations at Nottingham University.

    “The UK did not simply invent material, as the Soviets systematically did, but they definitely intended to deceive audiences in order to get the message across.”

    The IRD employed 360 people at its height in the mid-60s. However, its highly secretive Special Editorial Unit, responsible for the black propaganda effort, was much smaller. From its base in a nondescript office in Westminster, the unit used a variety of tactics to manipulate opinion.

    One was to produce “reports” sent to warn other governments, selected journalists and thinktanks about “Soviet subversion” or similar threats.

    The reports comprised carefully selected facts and analysis often gleaned from intelligence provided by Britain’s security services, but appeared to come from ostensibly independent analysts and institutions that were in reality set up and run by the IRD.

    Of course it would never happen nowadays, would it?

    https://www.bellingcat.com/

    • Thanks: AlexanderEngUK
  • Veterans Day came earlier this month, a public holiday that under the name of Armistice Day had originally celebrated the end of the First World War, itself then known as the Great War to those living during that era, over a century ago. Friends of the Palo Alto Library runs a local monthly book sale,...
  • @Syd Walker
    @AlexanderEngUK

    "the WEF have always been clear that they want a much lower fossil fuel usage."

    You drop this in as though it's unquestionably a dastardly and malevolent aspiration.

    Perhaps it is in your circles, but most of humanity has moved beyond casting doubts about the reality of anthropogenic climate change and the need to shift away from fossil fuels. As Putin said at Valdai, climate change may have dropped off the headlines but the issue hasn't gone away.

    There would, in my opinion, be something seriously awry if an elite networking group in 2022, such as the WEF, did not support action to sustain our biosphere. Some issues - such as the need to preserve a habitable planet and conserve biodiversity - are shared by the great majority of people who've given the matter serious thought.

    Replies: @AlexanderEngUK

    Of course greatly impoverishing or de-industrialising the West and the EU against the wishes of people in those regions is evil.

    Of course humanity is going to use up all of our fossil fuels unless some more efficient / better source of energy comes along in the meantime, and of course doing that will not cause too many problems for us or the environment.

    • Replies: @Syd Walker
    @AlexanderEngUK


    Of course humanity is going to use up all of our fossil fuels unless some more efficient / better source of energy comes along in the meantime, and of course doing that will not cause too many problems for us or the environment.
     
    This thread is not about environmental issues and I don't intend to argue about them here, except to register a cry of near-desperation that so many people seem to have been tricked into conflating relatively benign elite networking clubs such as WEF with the real sources of evil on this planet.

    It's like confusing a golf club with the mafia. There may well be overlap of membership, but they're scarcely comparable organisations - let alone the same thing!

    If you have problems with the WEF's analysis of global warming on the occasion of the 27th inadequate attempt to mount an effective international response to this crisis, perhaps you could direct them to Johan Rockström.

    He may be interested in learning why his analysis is so ridiculously incorrect from someone, such as yourself, who can presumably argue lucidly, and with full command of relevant facts, that he needn't be concerned at all.

    https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/11/cop27-climate-science-priorities/
  • In history books as well as in politics every story is shaped by where one chooses to begin the tale. The current fighting in Ukraine, which many observers believe to already be what might be considered the opening phase of World War 3, is just such a development. Did the seeds of conflict arise subsequent...
  • @phil
    @Adûnâi

    Russia has a genuine war economy. Its stockpiles of weapons are not at all depleted. An alleged depletion was Western propaganda. Production continues day and night. Russia has weathered sanctions better than anyone expected. As Angela Merkel has confessed to Der Spiegel, the West was responsible for the developing crisis in 2020-2021. Throughout the process of the Minsk Accords it did not act in good faith. Instead, elections in Ukraine were cancelled, Ukraine became increasingly militarized, and the shelling of the Donbas intensified. Thousands of ethnic Russians were killed. Now Russian forces, numbering over half a million, are preparing to push the front lines all the way to the Dnieper River, and possibly beyond. The fall of Bakhmut and Avdiivka are already closer to being accomplished.

    Replies: @AlexanderEngUK, @Adûnâi

    I’m puzzled as to why so many people are still saying that the so-called “sanctions on Russia” were targeting Russia. Russian energy supplies have been vital for Europe’s prosperity for decades, as well as Russian-supplied cheap fertiliser, and various raw materials.

    What happened this year was that the zionist-oligarch-run West and EU unilaterally decided to greatly reduce or eliminate their purchases of Russian energy. As all modern, developed economies rely heavily on very large supplies of energy, it was obvious to those oligarchs and many other people that those countries quickly reducing their energy supply by perhaps 20% or more (https://www.chathamhouse.org/publications/the-world-today/2022-10/putins-gas-warfare-might-galvanize-europe – Russia supplied 24% of the EU’s energy needs in 2021) would soon lead to a reduction in the size of those countries’ economies by nearly as much, perhaps 15% or more.

    As expected, the EU and America have been in recession since the summer and the Bank of England said the other week that this recession would be the longest British reession since records began, i.e., it will last until the summer of 2024. This means that the policy of refusing to buy Russian energy is set in stone by those oligarchs.

    The World Economic Forum (WEF), which appears to be the PR organisation for those zionist oligarchs, has been openly advocating for years for a large reduction in energy usage, especially for developed countries, and especially the countries the oligarchs control (the West and the EU). The covid lockdowns worked well in keeping Western and EU energy usage lower, known as “The Great Reset” in WEF-speak, until the much-milder Omicron variant came along at the end of 2021.

    We then moved smartly along to the next stage of lower energy usage or de-industrialisation, which involves countries simply refusing to purchase enough energy to run all their existing economic activity. This was achieved by instructing the zionist-oligarch-run Ukrainian puppet-government to ethnically-cleanse the Donbas Russians starting in March, which forced the Russians to intervene militarily, and then the zionist-oligarch-controlled Western and EU media was easily able to manipulate the public into supporting the very nasty, traitorous Kiev regime and into agreeing to their zionist-run politicians turning their noses up at Russian energy.

    If energy usage in the West and the EU starts to go up again to pre-2020 levels, I suspect that, sadly, we may see another US-laboratory-made pandemic, and/or there will be a big rift with China and a Western-EU-zionist refusal to trade with them, and there may be other low-energy strategies in the pipeline.

  • @RobinG
    The most consequential decade... Should we feel privileged to live in such interesting times? Despite the chaos, there's the underlying optimism of possibilities. The wheels of fate are turning in unexpected jolts. Was the NYT calling for dropping charges against Assange on your bingo card today?
    Major News Outlets Urge U.S. to Drop Its Charges Against Assange
    In a joint letter, news organizations warned that the indictment of Julian Assange “sets a dangerous precedent” that could chill reporting about matters of national security.
    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/28/us/politics/julian-assange-wikileaks-charges.html?fbclid=IwAR2V_7YVBUH096ETQwjTfcGWjehFIFverfFraswHdVmYztwPMj8JvkEyHQE

    Replies: @mulga mumblebrain, @ariadna, @AlexanderEngUK, @follyofwar

    What? Wow. Any significant part of the MSM calling for the dropping of charges against Assange was nowhere near my bingo card. I read that JA’s health has suffered enormously during his confinement up to now but still, that’s great news.

    (Amidst a sea of mostly destructive BS on Ukraine and the intentionally economically-self-destructive, WEF-approved sanctions on Europe and the West (not Russia!) etc., but nevermind, that JA news has made my day! 🙂 )

  • That was a pledge that was quickly ignored by President Bill Clinton, who intervened militarily in the former Yugoslavia before adding new NATO members from amidst the ruins of the Warsaw Pact.

    Most Americans only know the propaganda that this conflict started in 2022 when an evil Putin invaded Ukraine to reestablish the Soviet empire. It really began soon after the Cold war ended when the evil American empire expanded into Eastern Europe.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
    @Carlton Meyer

    Too bad the Russians didn't watch more 1960s Westerns/cowboy movies. Otherwise they would have learned that "pale face speak with forked tongue"....much much earlier.

    Sadly they had to learn the hard way. At least they can coin today's parlance "America is non-agreement-capable"

    , @Bill Jones
    @Carlton Meyer

    I thought 1783 was a good starting point when Catherine wrested back control of the Crimea from the Ottomans and established Odessa.
    The US (didn't exist) was a failed State even back then of course, just awaiting the Philadelphia Coup.

    , @Al Liguori
    @Carlton Meyer

    Putin's vision is Chabad's Kabbalistic vision: http://judaism.is/putin.html His mother was a Jew, so according to Jewish Law, Putin himself is a Jew. His Christianity is a convenient facade to give impetus to the Jews' third planned world war http://judaism.is/world-wars.html— gentile-against-gentile to force the enslavement and extermination of gentiles that Jews believe is necessary before their moshiach ("messiah," ANTI-Christ) reigns globally. http://judaism.is/kabbalah.html

    https://judaism.is/images/zohar%20shemot%2032a.png?crc=4106103369

    Replies: @Justrambling

    , @anonymous
    @Carlton Meyer

    WHY are the NATO countries going along with a disastrous War??? I dont think the Ucranian War is about USA vrs Russia..I think it is about ZIOJEWISH world tyranny vrs Russia/Iran/Nkorea/Hungary/ etc. Even the USA is under ZioJewish hegemony ..Russia is probably the last bastion of WHITE Christian Resistance..The jews without Putin/Russia will control the Worlds OIL/gas/water/energy/food/space/financial markets etc.

    , @Sorel McRae
    @Carlton Meyer

    Now just who might those "sinister elements in the U.S. government" that scuttled the prospects for peace after the fall of the Soviet Union be? Got to think ...

    I'm sorry, I just can't figure it out. Can anyone help me?

  • Veterans Day came earlier this month, a public holiday that under the name of Armistice Day had originally celebrated the end of the First World War, itself then known as the Great War to those living during that era, over a century ago. Friends of the Palo Alto Library runs a local monthly book sale,...
  • @Desert Fox
    @AlexanderEngUK

    I agree, the final end game of the zionists is the destruction of all nations and humanity and a world for the satanist demons aka the zionists and in this goal, they produced the biggest scam and psyop in world history covid-19 which does not exist, but scared people into taking the MRNA genocide injections, which is what covid-19 psyop was actually about.

    What it comes down to, is a satanist zionist war against Christians and Christianity , and we are like Russia , we can not lose this war, and nowhere is the war of satanic zionist against Christians than right here in the ZUS. The zionists are not hiding it any more!

    Replies: @AlexanderEngUK

    I think you’re mostly building castles in the air there.

    It seems beyond question to me that covid exists, though there are many lies around its origin and governments’ responses to it and so on.

    [MORE]

    There are no signs of a genocide from the mRNA covid vaccines, though it seems that they and perhaps the other covid vaccines continue to raise the overall death rate significantly, and, given that Omicron is much milder than previous variants, covid vaccines should probably be discontinued in almost all groups of people.

    I’m sure satan doesn’t exist from my own personal experience, and though I agree that many jews despise Christianity and Christians, in my previous reply I talked about why Westerners and Christianity in the West may be degenerating and declining earlier and perhaps faster than other people and places.

    I said that population genetic deterioration is the biggest factor IMO, and there is good-quality, scientific evidence to back up that view, e.g., the average genetic distance of Slavs is 5th cousin – so they naturally still have significant family and community feeling – while the average genetic distance of (White) Westerners is 11th cousin – this is outbred and goes a long way in explaining why family and community and even national loyalty as well as adherence to traditional values are so much weaker among Westerners.

  • @Ron Unz
    @PolPhil


    Some excerpts from the chapter “Patriotism and Profit”
     
    Sure, most of those claims regarding the tremendous profits that American business was making during the early years of the war are certainly correct, and I also agree that the pro-British banking interests, led by JP Morgan soon began pushing very hard to get America into the war, partly so that the Allies would win and be able to repay the loans that they had taken out. That's an important theme of the Zelikow book and many other treatments of America's involvement in WWI.

    But Jacob Schiff and most of America's Jewish bankers had not been involved financially because they were so intensely hostile to Czarist Russia and also generally friendly towards Germany.

    Anyway, the main point I was making was about the European banking interests, none of which seemed to have been originally pushing for the war in 1914, and some of which were opposed to it. Obviously, once the war began, they mostly had to follow along with the tremendous surge of national patriotism in each country, but there's no indication they led or provoked it.

    I think it's a little like the situation with America's oil industry interests and Bush's Iraq War. Lots of liberals later assumed that they were the ones behind it, but there's overwhelming evidence that they weren't.

    Replies: @AlexanderEngUK

    After reading that article and looking at the timelines, it seems very likely that the British made a firm promise in 1916 (or before) to support a country for jews in Palestine in return for powerful jews on both sides of the Atlantic getting America into the war asap, and both parties fulfilled their side of the bargain.

    • Agree: RedpilledAF
    • Replies: @Ron Unz
    @AlexanderEngUK


    After reading that article and looking at the timelines, it seems very likely that the British made a firm promise in 1916 (or before) to support a country for jews in Palestine in return for powerful jews on both sides of the Atlantic getting America into the war asap, and both parties fulfilled their side of the bargain.
     
    But the problem is that the Zionist Jews just weren't very powerful at that point, either in the US or in Britain, at least compared with people like Jacob Schiff or Paul Warburg. So I'm sure that the Zionist groups would have made that sort of offer, but why would anyone think they could deliver?

    The claim that the Zionist commitments later codified in the Balfour Declaration had been at least a substantial contributing factor behind America's entering the war has been widespread for decades, and I'd always vaguely accepted it. But based upon the reading and analysis I did for this article, I decided I'd been mistaken, and the timeline doesn't make sense, unless that WRMEA article is correct and the Zionists were secretly behind the Zimmermann Telegram or something like that.

    I think the Zionists later loudly boasted that they'd been responsible for getting America into the war, but they would have done that for their own obvious reasons, whether or not it was true. And anti-Zionist activists like Douglas Reed and Benjamin Freedman made that same claim 40-50 years later. But I wonder if anyone can find a solid, contemporaneous source making that argument.

    Replies: @JWalters, @Wokechoke, @Rurik, @Wade, @Z-man

  • @Anonymous
    But near the end of Hochschild’s discussion of the year 1916, he emphasized that unlike Britain there was absolutely no corresponding anti-war movement in most other countries, including Germany.

    Makes sense, the obvious being there were more liberties in the UK. But a more important reason could be UK really had no real dog in the fight. France was driven by revanchist passion and deep fear of Germany across Belgium. Russian-led Pan-Slavism was bound to clash with Germany and Austro-Hungarian Empire. The continental powers really did have a dog in the fight. For them, it was 'existential', whereas the UK could have stayed out, especially as Germany had no wish to fight the UK.

    Likewise, opposition to entering WWII was high in the US when it was seen as a war among foreigners. But once Pearl Harbor happened, the war came home, and opposition to the war was seen as treason. Lindbergh went from hero to zero overnight.

    And the reason for a powerful anti-war movement during the Vietnam War was because increasing numbers of Americans failed to see what Vietnam had to do with America. Even Johnson admitted the Asian boys had to take up the slack as American boys couldn't do it indefinitely.

    If a negotiated peace had ended the wartime slaughter after just a couple of years, the impact upon the history of the world would obviously have been enormous, and not merely because more than half of the many millions of wartime deaths would have been avoided.

    In retrospect, this makes sense but no one could have foreseen the Bolshevik Revolution, the rise of National Socialism, and World War II back in 1916. History is like the stock market. Things became clearer only in hindsight. Even so, things could have played out differently even had the war continued into 1918. If the Tsar and the men around him weren't such fools, Russia might have been spared the revolution. If the Versailles Treaty hadn't been so draconian, German democracy might have worked.

    Also, radicalism can result from triumphalism than defeatism. Italy joined the war on the side of the Entente powers, and it counted as one of the winners. Still, it was the first Western European nation to embark on a radical path with Mussolini's fascist revolution in 1921.

    And if Hitler had been somewhat more moderate, World Jewry might not have waged war on Germany, and history might have been different. Mussolini was initially not anti-Jewish and was mostly spared the wrath of Jews around the world.
    Of course, the real disaster of WWII could have been avoided if Hitler had not invaded Russia, which also emboldened Japan to hit the US. Prior to the German invasion of Russia, most of the wars had been swift, with Germany knocking out Poland in 2 weeks and, incredibly, much more powerful France in a matter of several weeks. Had peace been maintained between Germany and Russia, something like proto-EU would have dominated Europe with Germany at the helm. But Hitler gambled, though revisionists say Hitler reacted to looming Soviet threat. Who knows for sure?

    From other perspectives, World War I could have been seen as a good. It finally did away with aristocratic power across Europe. It finally led to the dissolution of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, something of a blot among Europeans. It was one thing to rule over non-whites in overseas colonies, but the Austrians were colonizing fellow non-Germanic Europeans who made up the bulk of the empire's population.
    For fans of fascism and communism, World War I led to a great opportunities for new political experiments. Even now, many see the Soviet Union as more good than bad. Also, the rise of Red Russia meant that the non-white imperial subjects around the world had an ideological and material counter-balance against the total supremacy of capitalist-imperialist powers. Throughout the 20th century, the Soviets not only inspired but provided indispensable aid to liberation/revolutionary movements around the world, not least in Cuba(CIA-Mafia casino) and Vietnam(where southern part was just a brothel).

    WWI also led to the total fall of the Ottoman Empire and a new chapter for the Arabs who finally came into their own with nation-states. It also led to modernization of Turkey under Ataturk, one of the truly remarkable figures of the 20th century. Depending on who you ask, it also led to the possibility of Zionism with Palestine under the control of the Europeans who, more than any other people, lent an ear to Jewish interests.

    Even though Western Imperialism continued into the decades following WWII, it was WWI that dealt a first big blow to European domination of the world, not least because non-whites recruited by France and UK to aid in the conflict learned about warfare and the power of nationalism.

    As for the now all too evident demise of the West, it owes more to prolonged peace, rise of hedonism and popular culture, excessive comfort that breeds decadence, and increasing Jewish influence that made Holocaust the new religion. And black prominence in sports and pop music led to fascination with primitivism. Indeed, had Europe experienced two more major wars in the second half of the 20th century and 21st century, things might not be so bad.

    Of course, it'd be bad in dead lives, but people would have grown more accustomed to essentials. It was the Great Depression and WWII that sobered Americans following the excessively indulgent Jazz Age. And what did prosperity breed in America of the 60s but drugs and sex and all sorts of idiocies? And even though anti-war elements say the US has forever been at war, it was almost always wars abroad that barely touched America.

    Americans today would be less decadent and degenerate if it was hit with Cloverfield or Red Dawn scenario.

    Indeed, the period after World War II was a kind of a golden age for Europe. War had sobered up Europeans, all of whom had learned an important lesson. And it soon became clear that imperialism wasn't necessary for Europe to be prosperous, and it was time of growth and regeneration. Stuff like May 68 happened because the young ones had it better than their parents and could play at radicalism.

    One negative effect of WWII was the near-total discrediting of the intellectual and cultural right that could have served as counterbalance against the Left and decadence, as had been the case in the interwar period. But the intellectual culture became overwhelmingly leftist, and this led to the miseducation of youths who grew up after WWII.

    Sweden stayed out of WWI and WWII but is falling apart like rest of Western Europe.
    Eastern Europe under communism was economically backward and politically more repressive. One would think nations like Poland and Hungary would be worse off because of the Iron Curtain. But communism encouraged nationalism(as long as it was loyal to Moscow) and emphasized moral essentials like family, community, and unity. After the Cold War, the newly liberated nations rejected communism but kept with the mostly conservative values associated with Soviet-sponsored communism.

    Arguably, Russia was the most tragic part of Europe in the 20th century. It was devastated by WWI, which it lost. Communism devoured millions of lives, and WWII devoured even more. And living standards were far behind that of Western Europe and of course the US. And the 90s were a hellish time. But despite all that, Russia seems healthier than the US and Western Europe.
    It's about who commands the spirit of the age than how many people died or how much wealth they have.

    Likewise, while Vietnam lagged under repressive communism, Japan-South-Korea-and-Taiwan were booming. But today, Vietnam seems healthier in culture and morals, in birthrates, whereas Japan-SK-and-Taiwan seem decadent, spoiled, and lifeless despite the wealth and head start in development.

    Replies: @lysias, @JackOH, @AlexanderEngUK, @Anonymous12890, @Curmudgeon

    “But Hitler gambled, though revisionists say Hitler reacted to looming Soviet threat. Who knows for sure?”

    I’m sure that if, as claimed, Russia had trained the amazing number of a million paratroopers (offensive only) and built hundreds of offensive, forward air bases along the border with Germany by the time Operation Barbarossa started, Russia caused Operation Barbarossa just as the western-zionist oligarchs caused the current conflict in Ukraine by ordering the Ukrainian genocide of the Donbas Russians in March, and those zionist oligarchs are also intentionally causing the current Western-European economic decline, all seemingly pre-planned long before February this year.

    However, I think the underlying and biggest factor why countries like Sweden and other Western countries are falling apart, and why Eastern European countries aren’t, and still keep “with the mostly conservative values” and why “Russia seems healthier than the US and Western Europe”, I’d say you have to look at the changes in population genetics of all those peoples.

    A big factor in genetic change is youth mortality (0 – 15 death rate), which before the Industrial Revolution was about 50%. Wealth and better medicine, etc. lead to lower youth mortality which means a deterioration in population genetic quality.

    Poorer people have always had more children than wealthier people, but pre-Industrial Revolution the high youth mortality rate meant that wealthier people had more descendants (eugenic), post-Industrial Revolution the wealthier people had both fewer children AND fewer descendants (dysgenic), because poorer people’s children died at much higher rates than wealthier people’s. Eastern Europe and Russia have always been poorer than the West (at least for many centuries), and the Industrial Revolution started later in the East and was less effective and thus youth mortality remained higher for longer there, and this difference has persisted to the present day.

    A good video on dysgenic breeding and related population genetics issues is Prof Edward Dutton’s “The Rise of Spiteful Mutants” at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kIechsT1grk.

  • @Desert Fox
    @Rurik

    Agree, I have that book , Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, this was a zionist takeover of Russia and they are trying the same thing again using their proxy the Ukraine, but they are in for a hell of a shock , Russia is going to unleash a Stalingrad like defeat on the zionis/nazis.

    Replies: @AlexanderEngUK

    That’s a common view – that the target of the western-zionist Ukraine war was Russians. Obviously, that’s superficially true, there’s been an eight-year civil war with the Kiev zionist-controlled regime attacking the Russians in the Donbas and Russia finally stepped in militarily in February to protect those Donbas Russians from being genocided / ethnically-cleansed in March.

    But actually, I think the grand zionist strategy was always to de-industrialise/impoverish Europe and the West including America (America has been in recession since the summer). It was easily forseeable that Russia would invade Ukraine to protect the Donbas Russians if it looked like they were about to lose, and it was easily foreseeable that it would then be a piece of cake to manipulate European and Western countries into refusing to buy Russian energy thus shrinking their economies, due to strong zionist control of most EU and Western media and thus public opinion, as well as zionist oligarch control of the national political scene and politicians of most of those countries.

    The World Economic Forum (WEF) seems to be the mouthpiece or PR organisation of the zionist oligarchs who run the West and the EU, and the WEF have always been clear that they want a much lower fossil fuel usage. In the last couple of years they’ve been calling their strategy “The Great Reset” but they’ve been advocating for it long before 2020. It seems the covid lockdowns were successful in achieving decreased fossil fuel usage, but then Omicron came along around December 2021 so the zionist oligarchs soon instructed Ukraine to ethnically cleanse the Donbas Russians in March, and the current spurning of Russian fuels is proving much more successful so far, with inflation rising a lot and all developed economies under zionist control shrinking fairly rapidly.

    • Replies: @Desert Fox
    @AlexanderEngUK

    I agree, the final end game of the zionists is the destruction of all nations and humanity and a world for the satanist demons aka the zionists and in this goal, they produced the biggest scam and psyop in world history covid-19 which does not exist, but scared people into taking the MRNA genocide injections, which is what covid-19 psyop was actually about.

    What it comes down to, is a satanist zionist war against Christians and Christianity , and we are like Russia , we can not lose this war, and nowhere is the war of satanic zionist against Christians than right here in the ZUS. The zionists are not hiding it any more!

    Replies: @AlexanderEngUK

    , @Syd Walker
    @AlexanderEngUK

    "the WEF have always been clear that they want a much lower fossil fuel usage."

    You drop this in as though it's unquestionably a dastardly and malevolent aspiration.

    Perhaps it is in your circles, but most of humanity has moved beyond casting doubts about the reality of anthropogenic climate change and the need to shift away from fossil fuels. As Putin said at Valdai, climate change may have dropped off the headlines but the issue hasn't gone away.

    There would, in my opinion, be something seriously awry if an elite networking group in 2022, such as the WEF, did not support action to sustain our biosphere. Some issues - such as the need to preserve a habitable planet and conserve biodiversity - are shared by the great majority of people who've given the matter serious thought.

    Replies: @AlexanderEngUK

  • @peter mcloughlin
    A fascinating and intriguing article by Ron Unz: search for elusive references to German peace proposals in the Great War. To add to this discussion, I have read few references to the British naval blockade of Germany, which resulted in severe hardship and starvation. Official German figures estimated that over 750,000 lives were lost. Other estimates put the number just over 400,000. Whatever the scale, its factual basis seems hard to dispute. Factual evidence is the basis for discovering historic truth, although historians can be selective in the facts they choose, to provide the answer they have already decided upon. What is more illuminating than evidence is pattern. It shows what links all history, answers why people act the way they do – why they continue to.
    https://patternofhistory.wordpress.com/

    Replies: @HdC

    Small correction: The British blockade took place after the cease fire of WWI, to force Germany to sign the “Treaty” of Versailles.
    This was not a treaty, but a diktat: Sign or starve.

    • Thanks: AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @Haxo Angmark
    @HdC

    half-wrong, half-right:

    the British (Royal Navy corking the North Sea)/&French (French+ Italian Navies corking the Adriatic) starvation blockade of Europe Central began in 1914....and then, as you say, continued on until May 1919 in order to force Germany to sign the Diktat.

    The total civilian deaths via starvation and starvation-induced disease was, in Germany and Austria-Hungary combined, in excess of 1,000,000 men, women, children....and this number does not include babies born dead...which by 1919 in German hospitals was running at 40% of all births. Cf.:

    C. Paul Vincent: Politics of Hunger - The Allied Blockade of Germany, 1915-1919
    Steve Dunn: Blockade - Cruiser Warfare and the Starvation of Germany in WWI
    Marion Siney: The Allied Blockade of Germany, 1914-1916
    Louis Guichard: The Naval Blockade 1914-1918
    Suda Bane and Ralph Lutz: The Blockade of Germany After The Armistice, 1918-1919

  • @Patrick McNally
    @Petermx

    That was fake news invented by Freedman. The Balfour Declaration was issued in November 1917, long after the US had entered the war. It had nothing to do with US entry into the war. Most prominent Jews such as Jacob Schiff had been opposed to US entry until March 1917 when the Czarist government fell from power. It was the loans to the Allies made by J.P. Morgan from 1914 onward which created the incentive for US intervention. But most prominent Jews had been against that. Freedman simply made up the story about the Balfour Declaration as a motive for US entry.

    Replies: @mark green, @Observator

    [The Balfour Declaration] had nothing to do with US entry into the war.

    Your denials are totally politicized, ‘Patrick McNally’. (I smell an Israeli operative in the woodpile.)

    The fact that the Balfour Declaration was formerly issued after America’s entry into The Great War proves nothing of the kind. The deal was to get America into the war (on the side of GB) and, once this happens, GB would issue the much-ballyhooed, pro-Zionist Declaration (in a letter to Nathan Rothchild, no less).

    Great Britain’s unauthorized giveaway of land to a third party (world Jewry) helped grease the wheels for the Nakba along with the bloody insurrection/occupation of Palestine/Syria. This human-rights catastrophe continues.

    The imposition of a Jews-Only State is still reverberating. Causalities are abundant. This Zionist invasion of Palestine can be linked to virtually every Mideast calamity since 1948, including Zio-Washington’s destruction of Iraq and Libya, not to mention the ongoing destabilization campaigns against Syria, Lebanon, and Iran.

    The Zionist project has cost hundreds of thousands of lives (perhaps millions) as well as trillions of US dollars. If there’s a worse investment in all of human history, I can’t think of it.

    Here’s more about how World Jewry steered America into The Great War:

    • Agree: Brosi, Rurik, Petermx
    • Replies: @Patrick McNally
    @mark green

    No one has ever found any contemporary documentation from the people who were involved in making up the Balfour Declaration which would support such a thesis. The motives for the Balfour Declaration, apart from Christian Zionism which already existed at that time and had an influence, was simply that the British foreign office imagined that Jews in the Provisional Government would be able to keep Russia in the war if they were offered Palestine. About a week after the Balfour Declaration had been made, the Provisional Government was overthrown, and attempts to keep Russia in the war became futile.

    , @geokat62
    @mark green


    Here’s more about how World Jewry steered America into The Great War:
     
    Excerpts from Chapter Four World War I & the Balfour Declaration:



    In 1917 British Foreign Minister Lord Balfour issued a letter to Zionist leader Lord Rothschild. Known as the Balfour Declaration, this letter promised that Britain would “view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people” and “use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object.”

    The letter then qualified this somewhat by stating that it should be “clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine.” The “non-Jewish communities” were 92 percent of Palestine’s population at that time,[70] vigorous Zionist immigration efforts having slightly expanded the percentage of Jews living in Palestine by then.

    The letter, while officially signed by British Foreign Minister Lord Balfour, had been in process for two years and had gone through a number of edits by British and American Zionists and British officials.[71]

    As Zionist leader Nahum Sokolow later wrote, “[e]very idea born in London was tested by the Zionist Organization in America, and every suggestion in America received the most careful attention in London.”[72]

    Sokolow wrote that British Zionists were helped, “above all, by American Zionists. Between London, New York, and Washington there was constant communication, either by telegraph, or by personal visit, and as a result there was perfect unity among the Zionists of both hemispheres.” Sokolow particularly praised “the beneficent personal influence of the Honourable Louis D. Brandeis, Judge of the Supreme Court.”[73]

    The final version of the Declaration was actually written by Leopold Amery, a British official who, it came out later, was a secret and fervent Zionist.[74]

    It appears that the idea for such a declaration had been originally promoted by Parushim founder Horace Kallen. 

    Author Peter Grose reports, “The idea had come to [the British] from an unlikely source. In November 1915, long before the United States was involved in the war, the fertile brain of Horace Kallen... had come up with the idea of an Allied statement supporting in whatever veiled way was deemed necessary, Jewish national rights in Palestine.”

    Grose writes that Kallen suggested the idea to a well-connected British friend who would pass the idea along. According to Kallen, such a statement “would give a natural outlet for the spontaneous pro-English, French, and Italian sympathies of the Jewish masses.” Kallen told his friend that this would help break down America’s neutrality, which Kallen knew was the aim of British diplomacy, desperate to bring the U.S. into the war on its side.

    Grose writes: “Kallen‘s idea lit a spark of interest in Whitehall.”[75]

    While the “Balfour Declaration” was a less than ringing endorsement of Zionism, Zionists considered it a major breakthrough, because it cracked open a door that they would later force wider and wider open. In fact, many credit this as a key factor in the creation of Israel.[76]

    These Balfour-WWI negotiations are referred to in various documents.

    Samuel Landman, secretary of the World Zionist Organization, described them in detail in a 1936 article in World Jewry. He explained that a secret “gentleman’s agreement” had been made in 1916 between the British government and Zionist leaders:     “After an understanding had been arrived at between Sir Mark Sykes and [Zionists] Weizmann and Sokolow, it was resolved to send a secret message to Justice Brandeis that the British Cabinet would help the Jews to gain Palestine in return for active Jewish sympathy and for support in the USA for the Allied cause, so as to bring about a radical pro-Ally tendency in the United States.”[77]

    Landman wrote that once the British had agreed to help the Zionists, this information was communicated to the press, which he reported rapidly began to favor the U.S. joining the war on the side of Britain.[78]

    Landman claimed that Zionists had fulfilled their side of the contract and that it was “Jewish help that brought U.S.A. into the war on the side of the Allies,” thus causing the defeat of Germany.[79] He went on to state that this had “rankled” in Germany ever since and “contributed in no small measure to the prominence which anti-Semitism occupies in the Nazi programme.”

    Replies: @Patrick McNally, @Ron Unz

    , @atlantis_dweller
    @mark green


    (I smell an Israeli operative in the woodpile.)
     
    You could make the effort to check non-anonymous commenters' comment history prior to throwing such allegations at them, though.
    , @Anon
    @mark green


    https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/2017-11-02/ty-article/.premium/britains-true-motivation-behind-the-balfour-declaration/0000017f-dc3d-d3ff-a7ff-fdbdc5ed0000
    Why the British thought a vaguely worded statement would galvanize American Jewish support for World War I - and how it became the engine that led to the State of Israel
     

    https://www.wrmea.org/1999-october-november/the-zimmermann-telegram-palestine-the-balfour-declaration-and-why-america-entered-the-great-war.html
    https://www.wrmea.org/1998-september/answering-critics-of-the-theory-that-balfour-declaration-was-payoff-for-zionist-services-in-wwi.html

    Following the appearance of my article “The Balfour Declaration and the Zimmermann Note” in the Aug./Sept. 1997 issue of the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs in which I put forth my theory of a trade, at the time of the First World War, with the Zionists getting Palestine and Britain getting America (as an ally—some might say a recovered colony), several readers have sent in comments, some of them critical. I believe I can answer them all, but perhaps it is better to address first the likely source of most of them.
     

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/the-balfour-declaration-a-century-old-and-as-disputed-as-ever/
    The struggle over Balfour’s legacy tells us that 100 years after a complex and often contradictory stew comprised of imperialist desires and anti-imperialist impulses, Christian Zionism and “philo-anti-Semitism,” realpolitik and idealism, converged in wartime England, a better understanding forged in open debate and served to willing listeners is still needed. With Balfour’s 100th anniversary upon us, there is no hope this will happen.
     
  • @Petermx
    It's interesting that you bring up the 1916 German peace proposal, Mr. Unz. I don't believe I ever heard it mentioned before either, except maybe once by Benjamin H. Freedman, maybe about ten years ago. Mr. Freedman was a Jew who converted to Christianity, and he attended the Versailles Treaty talks in 1919. He knew the other top representatives to the talks, and in this 1961 speech he gives his explanation why the peace offer was turned down and why we then had World War II. The recording of his speech is also on the internet, but I'll post the written version. Mr. Freedman said:

    'World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. Nineteen-hundred and fourteen was the year in which World War One broke out. There are few people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, AustriaHungary, and Turkey. What happened?

    Within two years Germany had won that war: not alone won it nominally, but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean, and Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, stood there with one week's food supply facing her -- and after that, starvation.

    At that time, the French army had mutinied. They lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army was defecting. They were picking up their toys and going home, they didn't want to play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed.

    Now Germany -- not a shot had been fired on the German soil. Not an enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany. And yet, here was Germany offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: “Let's call the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started.”

    Well, England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that. Seriously! They had no choice. It was either accepting this negotiated peace that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and being totally defeated.

    While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and -- I am going to be brief because this is a long story, but I have all the documents to prove any statement that I make if anyone here is curious, or doesn't believe what I'm saying is at all possible -- the Zionists in London went to the British war cabinet and they said: “Look here. You can yet win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally.”

    The United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were young; we were rich; we were powerful. They [Zionists] told England: “We will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war.”

    In other words, they made this deal: “We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay us is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, AustriaHungary, and Turkey.”'

    David Irving has copies of Winston Churchill's and Chaim Weizmann's (Israel's first president) pre- and post-World War II correspondence, and in one letter Weizmann comments on how Jews helped bring the US into World War I, and he says they can do it again [if Churchill is more helpful with what Zionists want].

    https://highlanderjuan.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Benjamin-H-Freedman-Speech-at-the-Willard-Hotel-1961.pdf

    Replies: @Patrick McNally

    That was fake news invented by Freedman. The Balfour Declaration was issued in November 1917, long after the US had entered the war. It had nothing to do with US entry into the war. Most prominent Jews such as Jacob Schiff had been opposed to US entry until March 1917 when the Czarist government fell from power. It was the loans to the Allies made by J.P. Morgan from 1914 onward which created the incentive for US intervention. But most prominent Jews had been against that. Freedman simply made up the story about the Balfour Declaration as a motive for US entry.

    • Disagree: Petermx, AlexanderEngUK, Brosi
    • Replies: @mark green
    @Patrick McNally


    [The Balfour Declaration] had nothing to do with US entry into the war.
     
    Your denials are totally politicized, 'Patrick McNally'. (I smell an Israeli operative in the woodpile.)

    The fact that the Balfour Declaration was formerly issued after America's entry into The Great War proves nothing of the kind. The deal was to get America into the war (on the side of GB) and, once this happens, GB would issue the much-ballyhooed, pro-Zionist Declaration (in a letter to Nathan Rothchild, no less).

    Great Britain's unauthorized giveaway of land to a third party (world Jewry) helped grease the wheels for the Nakba along with the bloody insurrection/occupation of Palestine/Syria. This human-rights catastrophe continues.

    The imposition of a Jews-Only State is still reverberating. Causalities are abundant. This Zionist invasion of Palestine can be linked to virtually every Mideast calamity since 1948, including Zio-Washington's destruction of Iraq and Libya, not to mention the ongoing destabilization campaigns against Syria, Lebanon, and Iran.

    The Zionist project has cost hundreds of thousands of lives (perhaps millions) as well as trillions of US dollars. If there's a worse investment in all of human history, I can't think of it.

    Here's more about how World Jewry steered America into The Great War:

    https://www.amazon.com/Against-Our-Better-Judgment-History/dp/149591092X

    Replies: @Patrick McNally, @geokat62, @atlantis_dweller, @Anon

    , @Observator
    @Patrick McNally

    It is often forgotten that while the Balfour Declaration expressed support for "a national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine, it carefully avoided any mention, let alone endorsement, of a Jewish state. Referring to the majority Arab population there, the Declaration went on to caution, "...it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine."

    Compare this with the policy described just six years later by Vladimir Jabotinsky, founder of the “Revisionists” wing of Zionism in his 1923 book, The Iron Wall, “There can be no discussion of voluntary reconciliation between the Arabs, not now and not in the foreseeable future… All colonization, even the most restricted, must continue in defiance of the will of the native population. Therefore, it can continue and develop only under the shield of force which comprises an Iron Wall which the local population can never break through.”

  • @Z-man
    @Karl1906

    https://youtu.be/D4EjRzzRQLI

    Replies: @Z-man

    The customer Was Right!

  • “Most of England’s appalling troubles today are due to a bad guess: she went into the war on the wrong side in 1914. The theory of her statesmen, in those days, was that, by joining France and Russia, she would give a death-blow to a dangerous rival, Germany, and so be free to run the world. But the scheme failed to work; moreover, it had unexpected and almost fatal results. Not only did Germany come out of the mess a dangerous rival still; France also became a rival, and a very formidable one. Worse, the United States was pumped up to immense proportions, and began to challenge England’s control of the world’s markets. The results are now visible: England has three competitors instead of one, and is steadily going downhill. If she had gone into the war on the German side she’d be in a much better situation today. The Germans would be grateful for the help and willing to pay for it (while the French are not); the French would be down and out, and hence unable to menace the peace of Europe; Germany would have Russia in Europe and there would be no Bolshevik [communist] nuisance; England would have all of Siberia and Central Asia, and there would be no Japanese threat and no Indian revolt; and the United States would still be a docile British colony, as it was in 1914. . . .
    The United States made a similar mistake in 1917. Our real interests at the time were on the side of the Germans, whose general attitude of mind is far more American than that of any other people. If we had gone in on their side, England would be moribund today, and the dreadful job of pulling her down, which will now take us forty or filthy years, would be over. We’d have a free hand in the Pacific, and Germany would be running the whole [European] Continent like a house of correction. In return for our connivance there she’d be glad to give us whatever we wanted elsewhere. There would be no Bolshevism [communism] in Russia and no Fascism in Italy. Our debtors would all be able to pay us. The Japs would be docile, and we’d be reorganizing Canada and probably also Australia. But we succumbed to a college professor [Wilson] who read Matthew Arnold, just as the English succumbed to a gay old dog who couldn’t bear to think of Prussian MP’s shutting down the Paris night-clubs.
    As for the mistake the Russians made, I leave it to history.”

    – H.L. Mencken (Baltimore Evening Sun, Nov. 11, 1931, “A Bad Guess”)

    • Replies: @Kinky Friedman
    @Karl1906

    Mencken always brings needed humor to making hard points.

    I think the most important warning in this article for the idiots and crooks leading America today is the German 1916 offer for peace talks. The world can never totally undo all the evil that flourished as a result of the English flat refusing to engage. The Americans now continue to fund the total destruction of the Ukraine for some dream of outlawing the Russians, which willed to Russia's collapse, allowing our evil rich to loot Russia.

    Sometimes your dreams lead you to utter destruction.

    Replies: @Karl1906

    , @Z-man
    @Karl1906

    https://youtu.be/D4EjRzzRQLI

    Replies: @Z-man

    , @Anonymous
    @Karl1906


    If she had gone into the war on the German side she’d be in a much better situation today.
     
    How could that have even been possible, if GB threatened Germany with war twice during two Maroccan crises before WW I, the second time in 1911, only 3 years before the war? GB always preferred war to competition.

    Replies: @Karl1906

    , @ROEL
    @Karl1906

    "But we succumbed to a college professor [Wilson] who read Matthew Arnold"

    Wilson succumbed to Zionist blackmail. Do some research.

    Replies: @Karl1906

    , @Richard B
    @Karl1906


    But we succumbed to a college professor [Wilson] who read Matthew Arnold
     
    I love Menken. But with the above quote he does remind me of two other important figures of the 20th century, G.B Shaw and Bertrand Russell, in the sense that none of them could resist a funny one-liner, even at the cost of accuracy. In fact, Russell once said as much about Shaw (takes one to know one I guess).

    In any event, I think it would have been more accurate to say either one of two things, that we succumbed to a college professor's interpretation of Matthew Arnold, or, that we succumbed to a college professor who should have stayed a college professor.

    Having said that, it was a funny one-liner.
    , @Dutch Boy
    @Karl1906

    Any status quo ante peace proposal by Germany was DOA because it meant the British and French war aims could not be realized: the elimination of Germany as an economic and imperial rival for Britain and the return of Alsace-Lorraine for France. They merely had to prolong the war until they could induce the USA to enter on their side.

  • The Daily Beast initially reported that Nick Fuentes didn’t go into the meeting with Ye and Donald Trump. When I heard that, I said “I don’t believe that.” Shortly thereafter, Axois’ Jonathan Swan – who is my personal favorite commie Jew journalist, simply because he actually behaves professionally despite having the same agenda as every...
  • @Priss Factor
    Xi messed up China

    https://twitter.com/david__moser/status/1596519192198406144

    Replies: @Supply and Demand, @Kim, @AlexanderEngUK, @spacewanderer

    China grows stronger all the time. These small, US-funded, astroturf ‘protests’ are not going to trouble China.

    • Agree: Iris
  • If Trump allowed a telephone call to interrupt an important meeting-in-progress (which is how the report makes it sound), you gotta ask yourself, “who is able to make such a call?”

    If said phone call indeed had the power to change Trump’s demeanor toward an individual who has demonstrated more guts and public virtue than Trump ever has, you gotta ask yourself, “who is able to make such a call?”

    Given the obvious answer to the question, you have to conclude that the Trumpdozer is incapable of learning.

    • Agree: Miro23, AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @Old Brown Fool
    @hardlooker


    If said phone call indeed had the power to change Trump’s demeanor toward an individual who has demonstrated more guts and public virtue than Trump ever has, you gotta ask yourself, “who is able to make such a call?”
     
    A more relevant question would be, "Will Trump be really able to stand up for Ye and Fuentes?"

    Replies: @lavoisier

  • So, Trump can still appreciate the purity of raw nationalism, it seems. The people handling him for this 2024 run apparently can’t. That means he’s finished. The rawness won it for him in 2016. the handlers made him an ineffective president and a sorry remnant now.

    • Thanks: AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @Robert Thomson
    @Emslander

    Election fraud is why he can't win, and neither can Desantis or anyone else who is not the Democrat nominee. It's a waste of his time to even run. The key swing states besides Florida are all compromised with mail in ballot fraud.

  • In discussing this week’s Grenfell Tower tragedy in London, the British politician David Lammy has resorted to coruscating language. The inferno, he says, was a case of “corporate manslaughter.” Although he has not been specific about who he is accusing, several entities evidently have a lot of explaining to do. This includes most obviously the...
  • @epnngg
    On a side note...I couldn't help but notice that despite the totally engulfed high rise, the structure did remain standing. Compare that to the Twin Towers and especially Building 7 that had a "furniture fire" burning on its upper floors collapsing rapidly into their own footprints after only a few hours of fire. Odd.

    Replies: @anonymous, @Peripatetic Commenter, @Beyond the pale and fedup

    Don’t be a stupid conspiracist. It had nothing to do with the Israelis!

    Buildings fall down all the time when furniture catches on fire.

    Well, at least, in my dreams they do.

    • Agree: AlexanderEngUK
  • On a side note…I couldn’t help but notice that despite the totally engulfed high rise, the structure did remain standing. Compare that to the Twin Towers and especially Building 7 that had a “furniture fire” burning on its upper floors collapsing rapidly into their own footprints after only a few hours of fire. Odd.

    • Agree: AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @anonymous
    @epnngg

    Odd, indeed.

    So odd, that the original 2006 Presidential Commission Report on the 9/11 disaster had not one word about the collapse of Building 7.

    (A half-assed 2007 addendum, subsequently rushed out to quell the resulting shitstorm of criticism, made a feeble attempt to explain 7's collapse in innocuous terms.)

    But, there you go. Noticing things.

    , @Peripatetic Commenter
    @epnngg

    Don't be a stupid conspiracist. It had nothing to do with the Israelis!

    Buildings fall down all the time when furniture catches on fire.

    Well, at least, in my dreams they do.

    , @Beyond the pale and fedup
    @epnngg

    WTC7 had office waste paper bins burning ie garbage cans.

    The diesel tanks were intact and unruptured and unburnt, it was merely burning paper wood that melted the steel lattice building structure.

  • Here the long-awaited results. Pretty much as expected, with no major surprises. About 2/3rds Black, 1/4 White, 1/12th Asian. The only unexpected things are in my Asian ancestry. Apparently, contrary to what I have been told, I have no South Asian ancestry. Also, of my East Asian ancestry, half appears to be Southeast Asian, rather...
  • @Jim Christian
    https://squawker.org/culture-wars/dna-testing-companies-like-23andme-admit-adding-fake-african-ancestry-to-white-profiles-in-order-to-screw-with-racists/

    Replies: @Pericles, @Anonymous, @YetAnotherAnon

    • Thanks: AlexanderEngUK
  • If “Wakanda” didn’t exist, we might have to invent it. Who would be so foolish as to take a fictional black ethnostate as a model for our own cities, when those with large black populations are plagued with crime and filth? And yet: That’s the wrong way to look at it. It’s progressives who have...
  • @Rich
    @DanFromCT

    I don't agree with your premise that Republicans haven't conserved anything. Under Trump, under Bush, there was no chance of reparations being paid, no open hostility to Whites, lower taxes more law and order. And a majority who favored a meritocracy over a racial spoils system that is against Palefaces. No, they weren't pro-segregation, most weren't against the civil rights act and most favor legal immigration, but they are worlds better than the anti-White democrats. And republican Jews, for the most part, share the values of the average Christian republican. As far as McConnell, he did keep Garland off the Supreme Court, for which he deserves applause. Garland presented himself as somewhat of a moderate in his confirmation hearing and will probably face impeachment if the republican win both houses in Nov.

    Replies: @AlexanderEngUK

    Yes, though the Republicans are anti-White, I think they’re objectively better in their policies in general and in their policies with regard to Whites compared to the Democrats, whose policies are often straightforwardly destructive and rabidly anti-White.

  • Alfred Schaefer was released from a German prison last July 1st. He had been imprisoned since 2018 for "Holocaust denial" and "incitement to hatred." Alfred's sister Monika Schaefer was also convicted alongside Alfred and spent most of 2018 in a German prison. The Canadian siblings were prosecuted after various Judeo-fascist organizations complained about their June...
  • @HdC
    @ruralguy

    "...a court of law, with its rigorous rules for evidence, would decide the factual basis of the Holocaust claim..."

    This was, in fact, done during the Zundel trials in Toronto during the 1980's.

    All witnesses, testimony, and evidence proffed by the prosecution were completely demolished by the defence attorney Doug Christy.

    And yet, the jury still ruled Zundel guilty as charged!

    Not until the appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada was this ruling overturned.

    Zundel had been charged with "spreading false news" when he published a booklet entitled "Did 6 million really die?" A Jewish Torontonian took umbrage at this expression of free speech and got the crown attorney to charge Zundel.

    The transcripts make fascinating reading as to what constitutes "evidence" for a deed.

    Attorney Doug Christy was brilliant in defence and cross examination of the crown's witnesses. He was a real defender of free speech in Canada.

    Replies: @ruralguy, @Curmudgeon

    At the announcement of Zundel’s prosecution, I lost several friends and made enemies for saying that his prosecution was wrong. He wasn’t promoting violence against anyone, and the pamphlet “Did Six Million Really Die?” was a question raising documented facts countering the “official” narrative. I contacted my then Member of Parliament asking why he was being prosecuted and got the standard “rise” of Auntie Shem-itism BS, along with the actual charge “publishing False News”. I asked if that was the case, then why isn’t every newspaper editor being charged, because they constantly publish false news. No response.
    I followed the trial as closely as I could, and noted that the Judge, Ronald Thomas, was extremely hostile to Doug Christie, and several in trial rulings were nothing short of bizarre, and hindered Zundel’s defense. The fact that the “official” narrative was also the Government narrative, in my opinion, was what swayed the (naive) jury. I noted, to anyone that would listen, that it was ironic the Supreme Court’s ruling, saying Zundel’s views were covered by the Constitutional right to free expression, were just about the time that plaques were changed at Auschwitz lowering the number of “victims” by some 2.5 million.
    Fast forward to the announcement of Monica Schaefer’s arrest. I contacted the moron collecting a paycheque for posing as my MP, and asked why his party was silent on her arrest, when Germany, under its obligations to the UN Charter, was in breach of its (UN) freedom of expression provisions. Deja vu – the standard “rise” of Auntie Shem-itism BS repeated as if reading (copying) from a (((script))). This past February, when the shabbos goy from Saskatoon, Kevin Waugh, seconded by the MP from “the most Jewish riding in Canada” https://thecjn.ca/news/thornhill-election-2021/ introduced hi “Private Member’s Bill to make Hollow-co$t denial illegal, (nanimously passing first reading), I again contacted the dullard posing as my MP, asking among other things, if he, and his (woke) party understood that the Supreme Court had already ruled on that in the Zundel decision(s). He has refused to answer.
    Former MP and Trudeau v2.0 mentor Irwin Cotler https://mediamonitors.net/irwin-cotler-is-too-israeli-to-be-in-canadas-government/ was declared, in an Israeli poll, popular enough to be President of Israel. The Con-job-servatives and New Dumbshit Party are both on board with our (((occupation))). We’re effed.

    • Agree: HdC
    • Thanks: AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    @Curmudgeon

    The backlash against honest and impartial holohoax (oops, I mean "holocaust") investigation is proof that this minor event in history is a total fraud.
    All one has to do is investigate the claims using basic scientific and logistical principles.
    --Killing jews with "bug spray" (Zyklon B) is not only impossible, but is laughable on its face.
    --Transporting jews to "camps", utilizing scarce energy sources, transportation and logistical difficulties only to kill them is not only problematic but impossible as well.
    --Tattooing camp inmates only to kill them is also problematic.
    --If the "camps" were truly "death camps" why would medical facilities, recreational facilities, brothels, movie theaters, and other amenities be needed?
    --"Gas chambers" with non-sealed wooden doors and the lack of ventilation systems for such facilities, once again, disproves the claims made by holocaust™ promoters. Doors that "swing the wrong way" would make retrieval of the bodies impossible. Ordinary light fixtures, rather than explosion proof lighting fixtures are claimed to have been the norm.
    --Claims by holocaust™ promoters that gassed bodies were blue or green (rather than bright red) from poisoning are totally false.
    --Claims that the inmates could tell when jews were being cremated by the color of smoke emitted from the crematoria chimneys are patently foolish and false.
    --Let's not forget "lampshades, wallets, soap and shrunken heads" made from jews is also laughable.
    --Crematoria running 24 hours a day, without "downtime" for maintenance on the muffles and flames "visible out of the crematoria stacks" are also impossibilities. Crematoria are designed to burn "clean" with no visible smoke and definitely no flames outside the stacks would be possible. Not only that, the claims that thousands of bodies were cremated daily are a statistical impossibility as it takes approximately 1.5 hours to cremate a human body. If cremation were used on "6 million" jews, the cremation process would have been operating into the 1950s.
    --The lack of depositories for bodies and ashes is more proof that the "camps" were not "death camps" but rather "work camps" for the German war effort.
    --Anne Frank's "diary" partially written with a ball-point pen which was not invented till the 1950s. Time travel, anyone? lol
    --Otto Frank was treated in a camp hospital and survived the war while his daughter Anne Frank perished. What is a hospital doing in a (purported) death camp?
    Germans were (and still are) excellent engineers and could not have engineered the grievous errors that are claimed by holocaust promoters.
    (((They))) are trying to keep their "con game" going as log as possible.
    Follow the shekels.

  • @ruralguy
    Ideally, a court of law, with its rigorous rules for evidence, would decide the factual basis of the Holocaust claim. But, this never happened. We saw the complete breakdown of this objective process during the Nuremberg trials.

    Of the 485 tons of confiscated German documents sitting in our National Archives, not a single document describes a Holocaust plan, even though the Germans meticulously documented every detail of their military campaigns. The prosecution sought and obtained very relaxed rules of evidence and criminal procedures to win their convictions, because they couldn’t win the cases with proper legal procedures. The German prisoners suffered severe physical symptoms of torture, but many of them said the psychological torture was worse– mock executions and threats to deport their families to the Soviet Union, where they would have met certain death. A legal team that has a winning case doesn’t need to resort to loosening criminal procedures, eliminating rules of evidence, falsifying evidence, and threatening and torturing witnesses. It rightly impugns their case. The U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Harlan Stone, said of the Nuremberg Trials: “Chief Prosecutor Jackson is away conducting his high-grade lynching party in Nuremberg. I don’t mind what he does to the Nazis, but I hate to see the pretense that he is running a court and proceeding according to common law. This is a little too sanctimonious a fraud to meet my old-fashioned ideas.” The hypotheses that the Germans conducted a Holocaust was never proven with proper legal arguments.

    Why were the Allies unable to prove their arguments through proper legal procedures? Because their arguments were likely flawed. If their reasoning was flawed in the Nuremberg trials, their reasoning was likely flawed in their political views of events that led to WW2. Americans were deceived by patriotism into adopting a biased perspective, instead of a properly reasoned perspective. Today, some 80 years after WW2, that war propaganda still prevails, with threats to imprison academic historians if they dare to challenge it. Germany needs to use prison threats, because they know their logic will not prevail under the scrutiny of science of logic.

    Replies: @HdC

    “…a court of law, with its rigorous rules for evidence, would decide the factual basis of the Holocaust claim…”

    This was, in fact, done during the Zundel trials in Toronto during the 1980’s.

    All witnesses, testimony, and evidence proffed by the prosecution were completely demolished by the defence attorney Doug Christy.

    And yet, the jury still ruled Zundel guilty as charged!

    Not until the appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada was this ruling overturned.

    Zundel had been charged with “spreading false news” when he published a booklet entitled “Did 6 million really die?” A Jewish Torontonian took umbrage at this expression of free speech and got the crown attorney to charge Zundel.

    The transcripts make fascinating reading as to what constitutes “evidence” for a deed.

    Attorney Doug Christy was brilliant in defence and cross examination of the crown’s witnesses. He was a real defender of free speech in Canada.

    • Agree: ruralguy, A. Clifton
    • Thanks: AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @ruralguy
    @HdC

    I'm glad Canada's Supreme Court looked at this as abusive prosecution and refused to acquiesce in perverting criminal legal procedures to support unproven WW2 war propaganda.

    U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Harlan Stone took a similar bold stance, when he examined the fraudulently twisting of the Nuremberg criminal procedures and rules of evidence. If the head of the highest Court in the U.S., which as a nation was a principal in the Nuremberg prosecution, says it was a fraud, then it is a fraud.

    Legal theory is quite interesting. Truly, every legal dispute should be resolved in pretrial memorandums or conferences, without the need to grand juries or trials. But, in the cases like you mentioned, where a prosecutor is motivated by politics, they can easily use ignorant juries to confirm their malicious prosecution or abuse of process. That is likely what happened in Canada and in Germany. They are using ignorance of the mob, to support their political biases and as a weapon to bludgeon their political opponents.

    , @Curmudgeon
    @HdC

    At the announcement of Zundel's prosecution, I lost several friends and made enemies for saying that his prosecution was wrong. He wasn't promoting violence against anyone, and the pamphlet "Did Six Million Really Die?" was a question raising documented facts countering the "official" narrative. I contacted my then Member of Parliament asking why he was being prosecuted and got the standard "rise" of Auntie Shem-itism BS, along with the actual charge "publishing False News". I asked if that was the case, then why isn't every newspaper editor being charged, because they constantly publish false news. No response.
    I followed the trial as closely as I could, and noted that the Judge, Ronald Thomas, was extremely hostile to Doug Christie, and several in trial rulings were nothing short of bizarre, and hindered Zundel's defense. The fact that the "official" narrative was also the Government narrative, in my opinion, was what swayed the (naive) jury. I noted, to anyone that would listen, that it was ironic the Supreme Court's ruling, saying Zundel's views were covered by the Constitutional right to free expression, were just about the time that plaques were changed at Auschwitz lowering the number of "victims" by some 2.5 million.
    Fast forward to the announcement of Monica Schaefer's arrest. I contacted the moron collecting a paycheque for posing as my MP, and asked why his party was silent on her arrest, when Germany, under its obligations to the UN Charter, was in breach of its (UN) freedom of expression provisions. Deja vu - the standard "rise" of Auntie Shem-itism BS repeated as if reading (copying) from a (((script))). This past February, when the shabbos goy from Saskatoon, Kevin Waugh, seconded by the MP from "the most Jewish riding in Canada" https://thecjn.ca/news/thornhill-election-2021/ introduced hi "Private Member's Bill to make Hollow-co$t denial illegal, (nanimously passing first reading), I again contacted the dullard posing as my MP, asking among other things, if he, and his (woke) party understood that the Supreme Court had already ruled on that in the Zundel decision(s). He has refused to answer.
    Former MP and Trudeau v2.0 mentor Irwin Cotler https://mediamonitors.net/irwin-cotler-is-too-israeli-to-be-in-canadas-government/ was declared, in an Israeli poll, popular enough to be President of Israel. The Con-job-servatives and New Dumbshit Party are both on board with our (((occupation))). We're effed.

    Replies: @anarchyst

  • Ideally, a court of law, with its rigorous rules for evidence, would decide the factual basis of the Holocaust claim. But, this never happened. We saw the complete breakdown of this objective process during the Nuremberg trials.

    Of the 485 tons of confiscated German documents sitting in our National Archives, not a single document describes a Holocaust plan, even though the Germans meticulously documented every detail of their military campaigns. The prosecution sought and obtained very relaxed rules of evidence and criminal procedures to win their convictions, because they couldn’t win the cases with proper legal procedures. The German prisoners suffered severe physical symptoms of torture, but many of them said the psychological torture was worse– mock executions and threats to deport their families to the Soviet Union, where they would have met certain death. A legal team that has a winning case doesn’t need to resort to loosening criminal procedures, eliminating rules of evidence, falsifying evidence, and threatening and torturing witnesses. It rightly impugns their case. The U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Harlan Stone, said of the Nuremberg Trials: “Chief Prosecutor Jackson is away conducting his high-grade lynching party in Nuremberg. I don’t mind what he does to the Nazis, but I hate to see the pretense that he is running a court and proceeding according to common law. This is a little too sanctimonious a fraud to meet my old-fashioned ideas.” The hypotheses that the Germans conducted a Holocaust was never proven with proper legal arguments.

    Why were the Allies unable to prove their arguments through proper legal procedures? Because their arguments were likely flawed. If their reasoning was flawed in the Nuremberg trials, their reasoning was likely flawed in their political views of events that led to WW2. Americans were deceived by patriotism into adopting a biased perspective, instead of a properly reasoned perspective. Today, some 80 years after WW2, that war propaganda still prevails, with threats to imprison academic historians if they dare to challenge it. Germany needs to use prison threats, because they know their logic will not prevail under the scrutiny of science of logic.

    • Agree: HdC, anarchyst
    • Thanks: AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @HdC
    @ruralguy

    "...a court of law, with its rigorous rules for evidence, would decide the factual basis of the Holocaust claim..."

    This was, in fact, done during the Zundel trials in Toronto during the 1980's.

    All witnesses, testimony, and evidence proffed by the prosecution were completely demolished by the defence attorney Doug Christy.

    And yet, the jury still ruled Zundel guilty as charged!

    Not until the appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada was this ruling overturned.

    Zundel had been charged with "spreading false news" when he published a booklet entitled "Did 6 million really die?" A Jewish Torontonian took umbrage at this expression of free speech and got the crown attorney to charge Zundel.

    The transcripts make fascinating reading as to what constitutes "evidence" for a deed.

    Attorney Doug Christy was brilliant in defence and cross examination of the crown's witnesses. He was a real defender of free speech in Canada.

    Replies: @ruralguy, @Curmudgeon

  • If any people have a reason to hate whites, it’s the American Indians. But, I get the impression that they hate whites less than Jewish Supremacists do.

    • Agree: AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    @Priss Factor


    If any people have a reason to hate whites, it’s the American Indians. But, I get the impression that they hate whites less than Jewish Supremacists do.
     
    If there us any group that whites would owe anything to at this point, it would be the American Indians. Really, that would be everyone who lives in America. Since everyone comes here to profit, nobody gets to play the stolen land game against whites. Blacks claiming that America owes them a thing is laughable at this point. Jews have been treated extremely well in America, and their complaints and subversion is nothing more than a giant stab in the back to whites.
  • Another day of large-scale missile attacks on Ukraine's hobbled energy infrastructure has plunged much of the country into darkness. The relentless attacks---which continued through the night and into the early morning hours---have intensified dramatically as Russian combat troops continue to join their units along the perimeter in preparation for a major winter offensive. Russian President...
  • Can Russia sink any lower on the scale of humanity? What a despicable race of people!
    ————
    Russia Traffics in Ukrainian Children
    Nov. 23, 2022
    By Nicholas Kristof

    BALAKLIYA, Ukraine — The children left this town in August for a free summer camp sponsored by the Russian occupiers, enticed by assurances of gifts and of safety from constant shelling.

    “The Russians promised it would be two or three weeks, and then the children would be back,” Nadia Borysenko, 29, told me. Her 12-year-old daughter, Daria, was among 25 children from this town in northeastern Ukraine who boarded a bus to the camp.

    Russia did not return them, however. Daria and other children are now across the border in Russia, and Moscow is making it very difficult for families to recover their children.

    The youngsters here are among many thousands of Ukrainian children whom Russia has taken from Ukraine and in some cases put up for adoption.

    The Ukrainian government count is 11,461 children known by name and taken without families to Russia or Russian-controlled areas. President Volodymyr Zelensky told the G20 summit that there are “tens of thousands” more who are known about only indirectly or with less detail.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/23/opinion/russia-ukraine-children.html

    • Troll: AlexanderEngUK
  • @meamjojo
    [ROFLOL]
    -------
    Putin tells mothers of soldiers killed in Ukraine: 'We share your pain'
    24 Nov 2022

    Summary
    - Putin meets soldiers' mothers, some bereaved
    - Putin: 'I personally, and the whole leadership, share your pain'
    - Russia has not fully revealed its battlefield losses
    - Some mothers say Kremlin ignores more critical relatives' groups

    https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/putin-meet-mothers-soldiers-fighting-ukraine-2022-11-25/

    Replies: @anonymous, @AlexanderEngUK

    A commenter on TUR who believes in Reuters propaganda? You must be jewish and/or a bot.

    • Replies: @meamjojo
    @AlexanderEngUK

    And your comment proves you have an IQ under 90. A perfect fit for UNZ!

    Replies: @emerging majority

  • Elon Musk is delivering in full, apparently. Just in: For those who don’t understand, this means total free speech in terms of banned people being let back on. All they have to do is follow the rules, and the rules are going to be straightforward. You probably won’t be allowed to say the n-word, but...
  • @Sulu
    @AlexanderEngUK


    why is it that increasing numbers of White Westerners are so woke and stupid as to believe things like men can be women or all races are equal?
     
    Because propaganda is one of the most subtle, insidious and powerful things in the Universe. While at the same time appearing completely innocuous. Think of the power of propaganda. If someone gives you a bar of chocolate, and you eat it, you know you have eaten chocolate. If they give you a slice of apple pie and you consume it you know you have consumed apple pie. But if someone hands you propaganda you aren't even aware that you have consumed it. And in time someone else's opinion becomes your own. It is especially effective the younger you are. If someone asks you to express an opinion on a subject you know little about, instead of admitting ignorance on the subject, you are apt to regurgitate something you were told on tv or the internet. And so, without even realizing it, you parrot what you have been taught and someone else's opinions become your own. And you don't even realize it! Most people have little or no ability to think for themselves. Propaganda fills that void nicely. And people can be taught to believe literally anything. That is the beauty and the horror of propaganda.

    Sulu

    Replies: @AlexanderEngUK

    That was a pretty good description of propaganda, thanks. I think you went a little too far, in that I don’t think you can get even low/no-information people, which is most people, to believe “literally anything”, but yes, propaganda is very powerful and can distort and replace reality to a large extent with most people. I also agree younger people are more vulnerable to propaganda.

    Having said that, I think there are always limits to what you can do with propaganda. Could you get American majority support for the idea that the Republican Party are so evil they must be banned, the Constitution replaced, and a one-party State installed? I think a significant minority of Democrats would like that, but I don’t think any amount of propaganda would get most Americans to agree. Will that be true in 50 years from now? Maybe. 100 years? Maybe not. That’s why I said I cannot blame the propaganda for everything, it’s inaccurate to think propaganda is the only important thing – the constant, underlying changes in average population genetics shift everything all the time much faster than most people think, the window of possibilities is always moving.

  • Another day of large-scale missile attacks on Ukraine's hobbled energy infrastructure has plunged much of the country into darkness. The relentless attacks---which continued through the night and into the early morning hours---have intensified dramatically as Russian combat troops continue to join their units along the perimeter in preparation for a major winter offensive. Russian President...
  • @Carlton Meyer
    Russia may choose to delay this offensive until March. If it succeeds in December, Russia will have to care for millions of Ukrainians lacking heated housing with water. Better to let millions of refugees flood into Poland for help and have a good laugh. Then win in March.

    Replies: @Verymuchalive, @Parrot Tax, @Colonel Corn, @Poupon Marx, @brostoevsky, @Anon, @Realist, @MaryM, @Tyrone Shoelaces, @julianmacfarlane, @Geneva Observer§, @Cold War Boomerwaffen

    You don’t seem to understand that

    A) Russian public opinion will not tolerate holding off until March when 380,000 reservists have already been called up, some of whom are fighting already. They want this over as quickly as possible.

    B) The Russians are only interested in incorporating those parts of eastern and southern Ukraine which have a majority ethnic Russian population. They are not interested in the rest, so will not be taking care of them.

    C) Holding off for another 4 months allows NATO, the EU and the West generally to engage in more of their hostile activities in the interim.

    D) Ethnic Ukrainians are not interested – or will be permitted – in fleeing to Russia. They are already fleeing to EU countries, and will continue to do so, regardless of when the offensive is initiated.

    • Replies: @Ukraine Tiger
    @Verymuchalive

    I doubt that winter will be cold enough to freeze the ground in Ukraine. It hasn't frozen for 2 or 3 years. That makes any effort to advance impossible. I think Carlton is right on this one anyway.

    Replies: @Verymuchalive, @Skeptikal

    , @Anonymous
    @Verymuchalive

    "But while some countries are doing their utmost to aid Ukraine – even while facing an economic crisis themselves – corrupt Ukrainian officials are
    using the funding to amass personal fortunes and live the high life at fancy resorts. And all at the expense of taxpayers in the West."
    https://www.rt.com/russia/566935-they-robbed-ukraine/

    Replies: @Verymuchalive

    , @Jacobite2
    @Verymuchalive

    There are Ukrainians and there are citizens of Ukraine. The only members of the Ukrainian Nation -- the tip-off coming from the Latin root-words 'natio' (nation, race) and 'natus' (to be born) -- are those born into it, and genetically related to other members. OTOH, any human could become a citizen of the Ukrainian State, which is only a legal status. The problem today for Ukrainians is that the Ukrainian State is ruled by citizens of Ukraine but not by Ukrainians. Ukrainian casualties and deaths are irrelevant to non-Ukrainians

  • Elon Musk is delivering in full, apparently. Just in: For those who don’t understand, this means total free speech in terms of banned people being let back on. All they have to do is follow the rules, and the rules are going to be straightforward. You probably won’t be allowed to say the n-word, but...
  • @Fidelios Automata
    @Stonewall Jackson

    We need to be realistic about our circumstances, but blackpilling only serves the Globalist Enemy.

    Replies: @Stonewall Jackson, @AlexanderEngUK

    One man’s being realistic is another man’s blackpilling.

    For example, I think I’m being realistic when I say that the average genetic/genotypic IQs of Western White populations have gone down by more than 10 points since the mid 1800s, and are declining at perhaps 1 point per decade nowadays (probably most or all other groups also have declining genetic IQs too).

    I think I’m being realistic because I’ve seen good scientific evidence for this, e.g. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4404736/, and I’ve seen The Jolly Heretic’s videos for explanations as to why it’s happening, e.g., https://rudd-o.com/archives/societal-decline-explained-by-the-rise-of-spiteful-mutants. I think it’s realistic to conclude that without a resumption of eugenic trends which we used to have until around perhaps the early 1800s, more or less all is lost regardless of other important issues.

    However, you will probably think I’m blackpilling because you haven’t seen the evidence for genetic IQ decline and don’t know about it, maybe you don’t care to know. You might counter that IQ scores have been rising for many decades, but I could point out that even IQ scores (expressed IQ / phenotypic IQ) in Western White populations have mostly been stagnant or slightly falling since the 1990s, and anyway, why is it that increasing numbers of White Westerners are so woke and stupid as to believe things like men can be women or all races are equal?

    A century or two ago almost none of our ancestors believed idiocies like that and nothing would’ve induced them to. I cannot blame everything on the lying, zionist media and woke indoctrination in universities and so on.

    • LOL: meamjojo
    • Replies: @Sulu
    @AlexanderEngUK


    why is it that increasing numbers of White Westerners are so woke and stupid as to believe things like men can be women or all races are equal?
     
    Because propaganda is one of the most subtle, insidious and powerful things in the Universe. While at the same time appearing completely innocuous. Think of the power of propaganda. If someone gives you a bar of chocolate, and you eat it, you know you have eaten chocolate. If they give you a slice of apple pie and you consume it you know you have consumed apple pie. But if someone hands you propaganda you aren't even aware that you have consumed it. And in time someone else's opinion becomes your own. It is especially effective the younger you are. If someone asks you to express an opinion on a subject you know little about, instead of admitting ignorance on the subject, you are apt to regurgitate something you were told on tv or the internet. And so, without even realizing it, you parrot what you have been taught and someone else's opinions become your own. And you don't even realize it! Most people have little or no ability to think for themselves. Propaganda fills that void nicely. And people can be taught to believe literally anything. That is the beauty and the horror of propaganda.

    Sulu

    Replies: @AlexanderEngUK

  • Will the people bring intelligent, quality discourse to Twitter, or will they be blaming the Jew?

    • Troll: AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @anon
    @Andreas

    Scared much, schlomo?

    , @Realist
    @Andreas


    Will the people bring intelligent, quality discourse to Twitter, or will they be blaming the Jew?
     
    If it is anything like this blog... it will be the latter.

    Replies: @Thomasina, @RestiveUs

    , @Jefferson Temple
    @Andreas

    Sometimes blaming the Jew is intelligent and quality discourse. However, I'm still not convinced that all of our problems stem from the Jews, so if you want to bring a different perspective to this website, bring it. That's the beauty of free speech, isn't it?

    Replies: @Kolya Krassotkin

    , @phil
    @Andreas

    Intelligent, quality discourse includes blaming Jews for their misdeeds.

    Replies: @inspector general

    , @Rurik
    @Andreas


    intelligent, quality discourse to Twitter, or will they be blaming the Jew?
     
    that depends on what you mean by "the Jew".

    If you mean the handful of people who claim all Jews are demonic and guilty, then I hope not.

    But is Kanye right to say Jews control Hollywood and the entertainment industry, and use that power to crush any criticism of how they run it?

    Is it correct that the post 9/11 wars in the Middle East have been orchestrated by Jewish neocons, to destroy any government that Israel considers inconvenient to its continued hegemony and persecution (and murder) of the Palestinians?

    Was it Jews in the Obama State Dept. like Victoria Nuland who perpetrated a violent coup in Ukraine, and have been using their quislings ever since to foment war with Russia? Is there any connection to our continued illegal occupation of Syrian territory, other than Jewish influence on our foreign policy?

    These are the questions that are generally verboten to be discussed on the controlled media and social networks online. Should it remain a forbidden subject,- the consolidated Zionist / Jewish control of the Senate, the media, the Fed and the U.S. Treasury? Among other things..

    Are asking such questions, 'hate speech', that in your opinion should be banned?

    Replies: @Anon

    , @anonymous
    @Andreas

    Truth is all you'll need. Why do you think shlomo is the ultimate champion of speech codes and "hate speech" laws? No need for name-calling, just cite it and write it. They're terrified of truth and of open debate. But I still don't trust Musk as far as I could throw him.

    Replies: @Kolya Krassotkin, @SafeNow

    , @Anonymous
    @Andreas


    will they be blaming the Jew?
     
    For...

    ...braying about being the bestest volk in the world EVAH;

    ...claiming to be the sufferingest tribe on Earth;

    ...crying out in pain while shivving others;

    ...committing endless, sundry crimes;

    ...abusing media/banking power;

    ...murdering Palestinians;

    ...killing US sailors and citizens;

    ...censoring goyim online and off;

    ...forbidding boycotts of Israel;

    ...bullying Uncle Sucker to fight Nosean wars;

    ...mooching off productive nations;

    ...jailing/firing/ruining anyone daring to question the Holycost; and

    ...engaging in other egregious behaviors?

    Yesssssssssss!

    Finally.

    And at too long last. (<:)

    Come all Ye's faithful and let musk fill the air!

    , @Fidelios Automata
    @Andreas

    The two are not necessarily contradictory.

    , @A123
    @Andreas

    The test will be someone tweeting the below without it being flagged. Then I will believe...

    PEACE 😇
    ___________


    https://sharylattkisson.com/2022/11/died-suddenly-a-summary-of-the-internet-documentary-about-covid-vaccines/


    https://rumble.com/embed/v1to6s2/

    Replies: @Notsofast

    , @neutral
    @Andreas

    The thing is that the jew is really to blame, the evidence of this is overwhelming. This is why they want to censor it so much.

    , @Legba
    @Andreas

    Yes, they will

    , @No Worries
    @Andreas

    Do you have a problem with jews being blamed for things they're responsible for?

    , @Munga Bulga
    @Andreas

    You scared, you little kike?

    , @XBardon Kaldlan
    @Andreas

    Yes!

    , @Richard B
    @Andreas


    Will the people bring intelligent, quality discourse to Twitter, or will they be blaming the Jew?
     
    As if anyone terrified of criticism is even interested intelligent discourse.

    Of course, if they have the power to effectuate their insane demand to be placed above criticism, they soon become incapable of intelligent discourse.

    At that point they're reduced to online trolling.

    , @Anon
    @Andreas

    Cue "It's the same picture" meme.

    , @Anon
    @Andreas

    Ah, Andreas. Are you another evil Talmudist supremacist trying to cover all Jews with the same sheet?

    , @spacewonderer
    @Andreas

    Intelligent discourse and blaming the jews are not mutually exclusive. And I will have plenty to say about negroes and chinks too, believe me. Will the word "chink" be allowed by Musk?

    Replies: @Alrenous

    , @Anonymous
    @Andreas


    Will the people bring intelligent, quality discourse to Twitter, or will they be blaming the Jew?
     
    When did those things become mutually exclusive.

    The evidence shows that's rarely the case on the largest, most important matters (national security, economics, engaging in wars, public health, standard of living, and most importantly, personal and public morality) facing Western Civilization.
  • Earlier: MLK, Antifa, And The City Burning Riots Of The ’60s “Don’t make the black kids angry.” Aside from being good advice generally, these words were the title of a book by the late Colin Flaherty, a man who grasped why racial integration, whether forced or “encouraged,” results in something less than peace, love and...
  • @Trinity
    Useless Republicans like Pat Buchanan helped ruin America. Was it 1992 or 1996 that Pat picked a Black woman to run with him as his VP candidate? People like Buchanan and Trump also publicly mocked David Duke in his run for POTUS. Buchanan nor Trump are in no way, shape or form, the man that Duke has proven himself to be. If we lived in a healthy nation it would be men like Buchanan and Trump who would have little chance of beating David Duke instead of the other way around. Duke was exposing Jewish power and talking about the southern border as a very young man in the 1970s.

    Replies: @36 ulster, @Gabe Krapplan, @Rich Collins

    David Duke, indeed! Ha! ha-haw-ha!

    • Troll: AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @Trinity
    @36 ulster

    Pat Buchanan and Donald Trumpstein.
    ROTFLMMFWO

    Duke had 3 strike against him.

    He was unashamed to be pro White and had GUTS

    He was a relatively poor White Southern male, not part of the good ole boy Yankee or Left Coast Club

    And he wasn't afraid to name the Jew

    We all know that the establishment PROBABLY had George Wallace shot in 1972.

  • Useless Republicans like Pat Buchanan helped ruin America. Was it 1992 or 1996 that Pat picked a Black woman to run with him as his VP candidate? People like Buchanan and Trump also publicly mocked David Duke in his run for POTUS. Buchanan nor Trump are in no way, shape or form, the man that Duke has proven himself to be. If we lived in a healthy nation it would be men like Buchanan and Trump who would have little chance of beating David Duke instead of the other way around. Duke was exposing Jewish power and talking about the southern border as a very young man in the 1970s.

    • Thanks: Legba
    • Replies: @36 ulster
    @Trinity

    David Duke, indeed! Ha! ha-haw-ha!

    Replies: @Trinity

    , @Gabe Krapplan
    @Trinity

    By "Jewish Power" you mean brainpower, correct? That's why we Jews control the world, haha!

    Replies: @Trinity, @anarchyst

    , @Rich Collins
    @Trinity

    What has this to do with the article? Trinity displays the mindset of a typical Antifa/BLM Morlock. Facts do not impact him/it/she/gerbil. Instead he posts a barely coherent whine that doesn't convey any semblance of reasoned thought.

  • The narrator of the opening chapter of William Faulkner’s The Sound and the Fury is Benjy Compson, a 33-year-old man with an intellectual disability who is very much the embarrassment of his disintegrating family. Compson’s diminished mental capacity, and the ‘stream of consciousness’ manner in which his thoughts and perceptions are presented to the reader,...
  • @Atle
    The Ye and Kyrie sagas are an interesting example of a momentous shift in the zeitgeist. I sense a new epoch of honesty is trying to raise its long-submerged head.

    Replies: @Robert Dolan, @SafeNow, @Miro23, @Anonymous, @CSFurious

    a new epoch of honesty is trying

    I am old, and observed an OLD epoch of attempted honesty, when Philip Roth presented the weaknesses and strengths of Jewish character. Roth understood, and depicted, the Jewish character better than anyone then or since. He met fierce resistance, a good example of which occurred when Wikipedia asserted that Roth could not be a credible source of information regarding his own writings. Ye of course is not as articulate as Roth, but then again, Ye possesses resources Roth lacked.

    • Thanks: AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @Fidelios Automata
    @SafeNow

    Roth also wrote a novel that demonized Lindbergh as a Nazi because he was an America Firster.

    Replies: @Colin Wright

  • @Atle
    The Ye and Kyrie sagas are an interesting example of a momentous shift in the zeitgeist. I sense a new epoch of honesty is trying to raise its long-submerged head.

    Replies: @Robert Dolan, @SafeNow, @Miro23, @Anonymous, @CSFurious

    As much as I would love to agree that things are changing for the better, I have my doubts.

    Henry Ford spoke out.

    Charles Lindbergh spoke out.

    Helen Thomas spoke out.

    Marlon Brando spoke out.

    Mel Gibson spoke out.

    Traficant. McKinney. Ron Paul, etc.

    Every so often some VIP mentions jewish influence, and they usually apologize, and the incident is forgotten.

    Until there are more significant numbers of people that become aware of the JQ and take a stand to oppose jewish supremacy, nothing is going to happen.

    And it will have to go beyond just The Noticing. Action has to be taken as far as removing jews from positions of control over gentiles.

    • Replies: @Zumbuddi
    @Robert Dolan


    Traficant. McKinney. Ron Paul, etc.
     
    In this Duran conversation, Robert Barnes commented that Tim Ryan, who represented Traficant's district, did not even win the vote in blue-collar Youngstown-Mahoning Valley OH. GOP J D Vance won the Ohio senate seat..

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBDGjQHbWGQ

    After a lackluster then abandoned presidential run in 2019, when Ryan entered the race for Ohio senator, signs suggested Ryan capitulated to Jewish preferences.

    BUT IT DIDN'T WORK!

    , @Bro43rd
    @Robert Dolan

    The snowball turns into an avalanche. So keep throwing snowballs.

    , @Jacobite2
    @Robert Dolan

    Henry Ford had too much money to be 'cancelled' , but Charles Lindbergh was another matter. It's not possible today to understand Lindbergh's status at the time (1941). He was "The Lone Eagle" and "the Most Admired Man in America". Add in the Lindbergh Baby Kidnapping, too. In a heroic speech in Des Moines, Iowa, on 9/11/41 (coincidence?), he said the only three groups in the US who wanted US entry into the European War (US public opinion was 85-15 opposed) were the Brits, the Jews, and the FDR Administration (the gentile members, I guess, although the State Dept and the War and Navy Depts were opposed). In Anne Morrow Lindbergh's memoir, she describes how, within one week, she and her husband became social pariahs in NYC and the rest of the Bos-Wash Corridor. Even 80 years later, I believe this is the quickest and most complete crucifixion of a major American public figure in US history. True, the Nation of Israel (which had publicly declared war on Germany in 1933) was fighting for its collective life (always collective with them), the enormity of the event must have left a psychic imprint on all Americans' minds.
    Even after this public exposure of Jewish attempts to draft American youth to fight to save the Jews of Europe (as well as the USSR, of course), amid the outraged denials, the Jews managed to do so (Harry Dexter White, Harry Hopkins, Henry Morgenthau, and Operation Snow, etc.).
    My father was Operations Officer for a B-24 Squadron in Italy, with the 15th USAAF. As such, he was quite aware of Jewish pressure from Washington to bomb concentration camps and feeder railways. The AAF top brass rudely suggested that they go pound sand, as they understood their mission was to defeat the Axis powers, not act as the cavalry riding to the rescue of Europe's Jews.

    Replies: @Houston 1992, @Thomasina

  • @RedpilledAF
    If the voices of dissent continue--more people speaking up--then we might see something come about. Jewish power is deeply entrenched in America and the world (for the most part), however, I hold on to hope, hope that we may see an actual change.

    Replies: @Nancy Pelosi's Latina Maid

    Jewish power is deeply entrenched in America and the world (for the most part), however, I hold on to hope, hope that we may see an actual change.

    I’d love to share your enthusiasm, but I’m not optimistic. You ever try to reason with a jew? You’ll lose. No matter what you say, they’ll disagree with.

    Their learned men spend hours every day poring over arcane texts, while almost always getting government subsidies for food, housing, clothes, to allow them to continue engaging in their tortuous philosophical pursuits.

    Other jews wake up in the morning and immediately start running business scams in their head (Milkin, Madoff, Bankman-Fried, pretty much everybody on Wall Street).

    And still other jews construct elaborate community organizing flowcharts so diabolically inscrutable that no regulator or inspector can ever truly ascertain where the funding’s coming for Antifa or BLM or 5000 other cultural termite infestations.

    Everything is three times more complicated in Jew World, but they like it that way. They wear angst like a warm sweater.

    The only solution to eradicate jews from our culture involves a New Hitler who’s not afraid to break a few eggs along the way. Political and philosophical solutions will fail.

    • Agree: AlexanderEngUK
    • Thanks: RedpilledAF, RedNordid1488
  • The Ye and Kyrie sagas are an interesting example of a momentous shift in the zeitgeist. I sense a new epoch of honesty is trying to raise its long-submerged head.

    • LOL: Trinity
    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    @Atle

    As much as I would love to agree that things are changing for the better, I have my doubts.

    Henry Ford spoke out.

    Charles Lindbergh spoke out.

    Helen Thomas spoke out.

    Marlon Brando spoke out.

    Mel Gibson spoke out.

    Traficant. McKinney. Ron Paul, etc.

    Every so often some VIP mentions jewish influence, and they usually apologize, and the incident is forgotten.

    Until there are more significant numbers of people that become aware of the JQ and take a stand to oppose jewish supremacy, nothing is going to happen.

    And it will have to go beyond just The Noticing. Action has to be taken as far as removing jews from positions of control over gentiles.

    Replies: @Zumbuddi, @Bro43rd, @Jacobite2

    , @SafeNow
    @Atle


    a new epoch of honesty is trying
     
    I am old, and observed an OLD epoch of attempted honesty, when Philip Roth presented the weaknesses and strengths of Jewish character. Roth understood, and depicted, the Jewish character better than anyone then or since. He met fierce resistance, a good example of which occurred when Wikipedia asserted that Roth could not be a credible source of information regarding his own writings. Ye of course is not as articulate as Roth, but then again, Ye possesses resources Roth lacked.

    Replies: @Fidelios Automata

    , @Miro23
    @Atle


    The Ye and Kyrie sagas are an interesting example of a momentous shift in the zeitgeist. I sense a new epoch of honesty is trying to raise its long-submerged head.

     

    Agree with that. 2022 isn't 1967. I'm fully expecting the Jewish Empire to fall apart. The whole thing is too corrupt and too dysfunctional. The public is losing out economically and the social failure and inequality is obvious. Also the pointless wars and government lies, deindustrialization, 9/11, Israel First nonsense, Covid "vaccines", FED currency debasement etc. etc.

    Replies: @cranc, @TheGreatGodNaturalRights

    , @Anonymous
    @Atle

    Our Grandparents and Parents were smarter than we are - they knew and openly said that Jews had a tendency to be "nickel grabbers". I remember my dad lecturing me after I had paid $18 for a basketball that was defective - I had bought the ball from a small store run by a Jewish guy - my dad said, "Son you've had a hard lesson on dealing with Jews." Our Parents didn't avoid dealing with Jews, they just knew to be on their guards. Some Jews even accepted the wariness.
    Jack Benny accepted the notion that he was a cheap scape and a money grubber - Hell it was part of his act. I remember one radio scene where Jack is walking down a dark alley - a voice comes out of the dark - "Your money or your life!" - a long silence - the voice again - "I said your money or your life!" - finally Jack says - "Hold on, will you ---I'm still thinking about it!"
    Anyone thinking that all Jews are honest or that all Blacks are gentle people will also have a hard lesson to re-learn. Needlessly.

    Replies: @Rev. Spooner

    , @CSFurious
    @Atle

    Check out Dave Chappelle's recent monologue on SNL. It definitely was not approved. He makes some great points about the Tribe.

  • In his new article “Energy from the Vacuum” scientist Josh Mitteldorf observes: “There are persistent stories of people who invent perpetual motion machines only to disappear or to die mysteriously or become insane.” After looking at the physics of various proposed free energy technologies, he notes: “Many people have speculated that such technologies are not...
  • @TG
    Color me skeptical, but even 'free' unlimited energy will not answer our problems.

    The development of chemical fertilizer, and the green revolution that exploited it to the full, created a vast explosion of food production. And yet, as the rich keep demanding that people breed like cattle, as populations double and quadruple etc.etc., increasingly even that bounty has been consumed. Many places today, like India and Pakistan, are now crushed to the limits of subsistence and the fertility rate is low because people are just so miserably poor that they are physically unable to have more than two children. The physical standard of living in much of the third world is lower than late medieval Europe (even though fake GDP numbers can look high).

    So suppose we have 'free' unlimited energy? Fine. And the rich - through both direct means and indirectly, through propaganda - double the population to 16 billion. Then 32 billion. Then 64 billion. etc. Ok we have energy. But how do we get rid of the heat of all those industrial processes needed to keep all those people alive? And if we solve that problem - in just a few thousand years, all matter in the universe will be made of human flesh. Then what?

    Exponential growth is just too powerful and given time it can and will overwhelm ANY technology. The solution is to stop the rich from breeding us like cattle, we'd have all the energy we need. But that would cost the rich profits and power, and that will never do.

    Replies: @Lorian Effervis, @Delmar Jackson

    How are the rich breeding us like cattle? In most Western countries the native population is declining and up only from immigrant invaders. If anything the rich are erasing and replacing Western populations. As far as being too poor to breed tell that to sub-Saharan Africa. The birth rate sub-Saharan Africa is quite high. Also there are some extremely poor countries that manage to deliberately reduce their populations like Bangladesh.

    • Agree: AlexanderEngUK
  • @Ben the Layabout
    Just a few common-sense (and sadly, also wet blanket) general observations:

    1. Beyond all doubt, it is possible that at times great discoveries are quashed as they are a threat to the status quo. Even discounting foul play, which must happen at times, is the simple fact that science charges only slowly, grudgingly. It's not without reason that it's been said that science advances one funeral at a time. Not because They need to silence some upstart inventor, but more because fossilized faculty is protective of their own ideas that raised them to their positions, and naturally averse to new challenges to the Ivory Tower.

    2. Most but not necessarily all of the claims of suppressed knowledge etc. are very poorly founded. They are, most likely, little better than the inventions of fevered imaginations. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.

    3. Finally, it's basic human nature to want to believe in a good story. That's why we have myths, religions and just plain good story-tellers. The underdog or victim of faceless malevolence is a staple in our mythos. There's also the element of the innate religious desire for a Savior, for the promise of some utopia. In this context, some magical energy source that produces no pollution and is limitless, fits the bill. The only problem is -- as with most fantasies -- what's hoped for probably doesn't exist.

    Replies: @AlexanderEngUK, @dimples, @durd

    Regarding your no. 2., I mostly agree but I’d say pretty much all the claims of suppressed knowledge are mostly unfounded.

    One thing I’ve never agreed with is that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Why not just apply the same standards of evidence to all claims or theories? In general, the more wrong a claim is, the less evidence it has, so that dynamic tends to naturally weed out the false claims/theories on its own.

    The most likely theory I know of that may lead to very-low-cost energy (and interstellar travel) is Quantised Inertia (QI), Dr Mike McCulloch’s theory. There’s lots of evidence for QI. Mike’s Twitter is https://twitter.com/memcculloch, his blog is https://physicsfromtheedge.blogspot.com/.

  • Tl;dr: Free energy tech most probably doesn’t exist, but Dr Mike McCulloch’s recent theory, Quantised Inertia (QI), implies very-low-cost energy and interstellar travel are possible. DARPA has funded him to the tune of $1.3 million, results are promising.

    I looked into free energy / ZPE maybe a decade ago, and strongly concluded that it didn’t exist, although I noted that there have been anomalous results in this kind of field for a century or so, e.g., the Podkletnov gravity shielding effects of the 1990s.

    A few years ago, I came across Dr Mike McCulloch, of Plymouth University, England. His theory of Quantised Inertia (QI) implies the possibility of very low cost energy from the vacuum / quantum flux, and crucially, this is the only theory I’ve ever seen in this kind of field that is backed up by solid, published/checkable maths, (and Mike has published 26 papers in reputable journals on various, related subjects, though most of his QI papers over the last decade or so have been rejected).

    Mike was awarded $1.3 million in DARPA funding, which he’s almost finished using to demonstrate QI in the laboratory, with promising results and a forthcoming paper according to his Twitter feed.

    I’m not a mathematician or physicist, but I’d say the central insight of QI is that gravity is not a pull between physical objects as the name implies, instead, gravity is a push on physical objects from the vacuum / quantum field / ZPF. This push is manipulable.

    QI correctly predicts the bending of light around the sun, all the motions of our solar system, and, importantly, the orbits of wide binary star systems and galaxies without resorting to dark matter/energy, which no other theory does without inserting arbitrary parameters. All these predictions are in published papers.

    QI explains things like sonoluminescence and inertia. QI also predicts that very low cost energy is possible on Earth as I mentioned above, and that using QI theory we can build propellant-free spacecraft that can reach a significant fraction of the speed of light thus making interstellar travel practicable.

    If you found any of this interesting, you can follow Mike on Twitter here https://twitter.com/memcculloch, and read his blog here https://physicsfromtheedge.blogspot.com/. Here’s a short TEDx talk by Mike at Plymouth University on what QI is and how it works: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnNKC82wUmY.

  • It’s our values in a democracy to execute POWs. RT: Oh, right – they were disarmed, lying face-down on the ground, but planning to pop up, grab guns, and shoot the Ukraine people. The Ukraines were defending themselves from people with no guns lying face down on the ground. [image][F] POWs seen prepar
  • @We are all Dumb
    The loser cries about War crimes. The winner does whats necessary to win. Unfortunately Hitler and the Reich didn't have the real stomach for Total War and they lost. I would suggest anyone read Curtis LeMays comments on "war crimes". Our ancestors didnt believe in war crimes and thats why they conquered the world.

    Replies: @beavertales, @Tom Welsh, @anarchyst, @Colin Wright, @AlexanderEngUK, @Kurt Knispel

    Your comment would make some sort of sense if Ukraine were winning, but it isn’t, it’s losing badly against the good guys in this conflict, Russia.

  • Although it's too soon to be sure, the early signs are not looking good for Elon Musk's $44 billion purchase of Twitter, thereby demonstrating once again how easily the concentrated power of the media can destroy those whom it turns against. The South African-born Tech entrepreneur entered the fray having several seemingly huge advantages. He...
  • @OrangeSmoke
    @Cranberries

    I disagree that Chappelle supported Kanye, he just reinforced the comments that Kanye was mentally ill because he told the truth about his parasitic Jewish managers and his evil trainer. Of course he said that Kanye was not insane but then went on to say that he was "not well" to placate the ADL. He went on a very strange Democrat rant about Walker being stupid and that the Ukrainians were beating the hell out of the Russians. If he believes that then Chappelle is not well informed. He calls Trump an "honest liar" by pointing out that many of the things he said during the 2016 campaign were true and that is why people supported him.

    Chappelle has great timing, presentation and is funny but he did Kanye no favors and essentially kissed the feet of his masters at the SNL show.

    Replies: @Prester John, @Kevin Barrett, @AlexanderEngUK, @Joseph A.

    Chappelle trod the line between cancellation on one side and truth and backing up his friend, Ye, very well in that SNL sketch, which I thought was genuinely funny. I think Chappelle’s support for Ye was confirmed by the hostile response to Chappelle’s monologue from the ADL and other jew supremacists/apologists.

    E.g. Chappelle said something like “It’s not crazy to think that jews control the media, but it’s certainly a crazy thing to say” and at the end “I hope they don’t take anything away from me [because of what I’ve said]…. whoever they are!” with a big smile. For me, Chappelle’s clearly agreeing with Ye, and Chappelle’s a comedian so he did it in a funny and roundabout way.

    • Replies: @Anonydogg
    @AlexanderEngUK

    Also the line "... Ye is not crazy... He is unwell..." I think he was saying that Ye is in a tight spot after the Jews targeted him so viciously

    Replies: @mulga mumblebrain

  • >Almost none of his fellow black celebrities rallied to [West’s] side, or if they did, I didn’t hear about it.

    Dave Chapelle did. Apparently he left the spicier parts of this monologue out when running it by SNL’s producers. He really did a perfect job of supporting West here without stepping over the line into cancel territory himself. There was some impotent whining from ADL’s Greenblatt but the appetite for going after yet another black celebrity (after West and Irving) seems to have dissipated:

    • Replies: @OrangeSmoke
    @Cranberries

    I disagree that Chappelle supported Kanye, he just reinforced the comments that Kanye was mentally ill because he told the truth about his parasitic Jewish managers and his evil trainer. Of course he said that Kanye was not insane but then went on to say that he was "not well" to placate the ADL. He went on a very strange Democrat rant about Walker being stupid and that the Ukrainians were beating the hell out of the Russians. If he believes that then Chappelle is not well informed. He calls Trump an "honest liar" by pointing out that many of the things he said during the 2016 campaign were true and that is why people supported him.

    Chappelle has great timing, presentation and is funny but he did Kanye no favors and essentially kissed the feet of his masters at the SNL show.

    Replies: @Prester John, @Kevin Barrett, @AlexanderEngUK, @Joseph A.

  • Twitter is/was Deep State’s most powerful propaganda tool.
    Musk has now interfered with Deep State’s largest psyops program.
    Musk is now Deep State’s enemy number one.
    Note to Elon: don’t try to seek refuge in the Ecuadorian Embassy/Consulate.

    • Agree: Realist, AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Anonymous


    Twitter is/was Deep State’s most powerful propaganda tool.
    Musk has now interfered with Deep State’s largest psyops program.
     
    Who will be the first to break the story about FTX being a conduit for Western intelligence agencies funneling black budget money to Ukraine and [other entities] to regime change Russia?? 🤔

    Tucker?

    Replies: @RDF2, @Rev. Spooner

  • Here’s a lengthy comment I left a few years ago on my view of the dynamics of political/media conflicts. I’d originally been thinking of including it in the body of my piece since it was somewhat relevant to the situation regarding the ADL, but finally decided it was too long and extraneous:

    Well, as someone who’s actually been involved in quite a number of major political campaigns, several of them successful, let me contribute my own perspective…

    First, media totally dominates our political world, so much so that there’s no other factor of even remotely comparable importance. Aside from the desire of campaign consultants to get rich, the only reason politicians raise money is to buy media, mostly paid (i.e. ads) but also free (i.e. campaign consultants who can effectively spin reporters and shape the coverage).

    Personally, I think the best metaphor I’ve ever encountered for understanding the role of media in politics is found in the Warlock stories of Larry Niven, the noted SF writer. In his framework, mana is the raw power source behind magic, the resource necessary to produce desired effects, much like hydrocarbons that power our industrial civilization. Basically, media is the mana of political campaigns.

    So the two, somewhat independent, needs of a political campaign are to acquire sufficient mana and then to shape it effectively. Elected officials, celebrities, and those with connections to major media organs tend to have automatic access to reasonable supplies of mana, but their effectiveness at using it can vary dramatically. Also, in the case of elected officials, they may be used to controlling the mana in their local area, but are often unprepared for the situation elsewhere, where their usual sources of power do not apply.

    Candidates who do not start with such a powerful, pre-existing base are faced with drawing sufficient mana for their campaigns to even come into being. If the media doesn’t cover you, then you don’t exist, and your 2% in the national polls would be comparable to that of a fictitious individual provided as a placebo (non-existent individuals with invented names sometimes get 5% or higher support in political polls).

    So, how to get mana? Well, one less pleasant way, is to do or say sufficiently outrageous or controversial things that the media covers you. For example, a few weeks ago some unknown individual with no funding paid $200 to file a California ballot initiative mandating the death penalty for all homosexuals, calling it “The Sodomite Suppression Act” or something like that. Normally, random ballot initiatives get zero coverage, but he got lots of ink and maybe some electronic coverage, probably millions of dollars worth of free mana. The problem with this approach is that the mana comes in the form of a massively destructive blast from all directions, which probably doesn’t help you actually get elected. Over the years, various rightwing Republican candidates for president have knowingly or unknowing followed this sort of approach to cope with their lack of funding, without a history of much success. To some extent, the proposed positions of the hypothetical “Fred” represent an attenuated version of this strategy.

    Now getting hit by a blast of pure mana isn’t a great recipe for winning a campaign, but it beats having no access to any mana at all, which is the fate of an unknown candidate whose positions are bland or mainstream. And the crucial possibility is that a sufficiently skilled political sorcerer may be able to divert and capture at least a portion of the mana in that blast, reshaping it to power his own defenses and perhaps even a counterattack. This is not easy—indeed it’s *exceptionally* difficult—but pretty much the only option under the circumstances. Thus, suffering a massive, one-sided attack may provide the only slight chance of winning.

    If the Opposition largely controls the sources of mana, namely the media, they may realize this, and deliberately avoid providing any visibility to the “dangerous ideas” of their opponent, following the classic “blackout strategy.” Notably, the MSM and the Republicans used this approach quite effectively against the Ron Paul campaign in 2008. (And if your response isn’t sufficiently disciplined, they can shape any slight carelessness into a crushing disaster, as was used against the Howard Dean campaign in 2004.)

    One counter-move is to try to take advantage of any ill-discipline among your massively mana-rich opponents. For example, if they’ve decided upon a classic “blackout strategy” but you can provoke a few of them into foolish attacks, that not only provides you some necessary resources, but the chance for easy early victories if their smarter and more powerful elements stick with the blackout.

    And the ideal situation is to take positions that *seem* crazy and very vulnerable, thereby drawing the shock and the attacks, but which are actually much stronger and more defensible than realized. Once again, this is *not* easy to pull off.

    In political campaigns my own preferred approach has always been a combination of strategic offense and tactical defense, namely trying to quickly occupy a position astride the Opposition lines of supply and communications, thereby almost forcing them to attack lest they risk the entire collapse of their front.

    https://www.unz.com/article/the-left-has-already-won-the-2016-election/#comment-987039

    • Agree: JohnnyWalker123
    • Thanks: TKK, HdC, AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @Kratoklastes
    @Ron Unz

    mana is an interesting choice of term - by Larry Niven, and by yourself by reference.

    In Maori, it means "prestige, authority, control, power, influence, status, spiritual power, charisma" and is - like Niven's version - something that permeates the universe and everything in it, to greater or lesser extents.

    Considering that Maori and broader Polynesian culture only diverged in about the 1500s, the Maori version of manais roughly in line with its meaning in broader Polynesian culture. Maybe that's where Niven picked up the term.

    I would argue that Maori take the concepts more seriously as a matter of current culture: mana tangata - the mana of the people in an area - and mana huaanga (also known as mana taonga) - the mana associated with control over resources or 'treasure' - are central to current arguments over the validity of the (claimed) cession of sovereignty over New Zealand to the English. (TL;DR: the United Chiefs did not cede sovereignty. They couldn't under their own laws. This has been recognised by Wai 1040, and the legal arguments will play out over the course of the next lifetime).

    Related to this is kaitiakitanga - which is, very specifically, stewardship - which contributes to the mana of chieftains (rangatira) subject to the rules of being a chieftain (rangatiratanga).

    Ceding mana taonga is inconsistent with both kaitiakitanga and rangatiratanga, which is why there is absolutely no way that 500 Maori with the authority to do so would have agreed to cede rangatiratanga to the English.

    The document they agreed to doesn't even say that they cede rangatiratanga: it says that they grant kawanatanga - governorship - over the White settlers.

    This chicanery should remind everyone of the Balfour Declaration's second bit...


    ... it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine...
     
    Little wonder that the Russians have finally worked out that the West's political class are недоговороспособны - 'non-agreement-capable'. The world's brown folks would use a different word in Russian: пизду (rhymes with 'runts').

    Folks who like the idea of mana will love the (related) idea of utu. It's very much like Brick Top's idea of 'Nemesis'...

    https://youtu.be/QGsQ2gPzAf4?t=160

    Replies: @Simon D

    , @frankie p
    @Ron Unz

    Ron,

    First, thanks as always for being the stand up man that you are, devoted to pursuit of the truth and freedom to speak about it in every situation.

    I like the mana idea, and I agree with you that media is the most influential and powerful thing in our society.
    I can't help but conclude that this circumstance is not beneficial to society. It's overall effect is detrimental. Having a population who believe that they enjoy "freedom of the press" is the WORST thing for the US. It's much better in China or the old USSR, where the population KNOW and KNEW that the press wasn't free, and they looked at it through skeptical glasses.

    , @Wild Man
    @Ron Unz

    I suppose that might be one of the reasons why you have chosen to be in the mana bizz yourself. But the mana can be subverted - no?

    Allow me a silly analogy (I know it's silly, but it is a personal anecdote, and we each only have a limited supply of those): When I was a young lad, on summer break from elementary school (it must have been one of the later elementary grades - grade 5 or 6), I became a bit bored by mid-summer, and decided that I was just the young fellow, to start a youth magazine. Well, .... one soon finds that, if you want to publish, you have to find stuff that people might deem worthy of reading, and so the first order of business, is developing copy. Of course that is where I almost immediately failed. Since there was no rag to point to yet, to get others enthused about writing for it, ... I realized I would need to write all the copy myself. OK, so I looked around as to what was going on in the culture. Well, there was always this 'drug scare' thing coming up and reoccurring in the culture, ..... so I thought I would use that topic as the feature for the first edition, write up some really cool personal interest stories about people who had bad horrific experiences with elicit street drugs, which of course I didn't know any such people, because I was still just a little kid, ... but you know, ... my thinking was - keep it topical - I was already familiar with the genre - just make it up.

    Well, .... I soon became un-enthused. I soon realized that all my copy was complete shite because it was complete BS, completely fabricated, ..... and that is when I realized what this publishing game is all about (a very fine line if one is going to chose to do it right, .... which was well beyond my capacity to take on as a young lad, because I was still a completely naive greenhorn, as almost all young lads are, so was not only incapable of writing good copy myself, but was also incapable of judging the overall worthiness of copy as presented by others). I guess the happy ending to the story, is that I decided I should just go outside and pay with my friends like a little kid again (because that is what I was, .... enough of this influence-bizz for now, .... do some living first).

    Of course, I think you are well aware of that fine line, and that is what you are after here at the UR (topical but relevant, and truthy instead of bull-shitty). And if anyone has the chops, experience and overall worthiness to do it, at this stage in your life, .... well that would be Ron Unz, we all agree.

    OK, ... saying all that, ... I am wondering what your thoughts are on all these claims of Jewish subversion of the mana the enervates culture (especially MSM)? It looks to me, to be a big problem - am I wrong?

    Perhaps those most skilled at this mana-subversion, can afford the capital cost of acquiring those mana-producing assets, .... as the asset paired with the subverso-skill can lead to some very large gains in engineered-influence, ... and where there is engineered-influence, there is money. A lot of people say, all this is a Jewish specialty. Are they wrong?

    , @Corvinus
    @Ron Unz

    “For generations “free speech” had been one of the most universally cherished American values, but after Donald Trump used the power of his free speech on Twitter to unexpectedly win the White House, those prevailing sentiments very rapidly changed, and the need to exclude “fake news” and suppress “hate speech” became the accepted priority of all right-thinking individuals obedient to the narrative of the mainstream media.”

    Free speech remains a potent force in our country. It’s just that there are always consequence for what one says.

    Sure, the Johnny Walker’s and the clifford brown’s of the world have the liberty to falsely claim that “a secret society runs the country from the shadows” and “Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell (like her father before her) were intelligence assets for Israel, organized crime and likely certain elements of US intelligence”, The problem is that this “opinion” becomes “truth”, which spreads like a cancer, thus metastasizing discourse. It’s a race to the bottom of the brain stem.

    Case in point—Hilary Clinton on Twitter linked to a Los Angeles Times article about what happened to Pelosi’s husband, and then Elon Musk countered with *a post from a fake-news site* that soon was taken down. Then he wrote there was a “tiny possibility” what he linked to had been was wrong as a hedge against spreading disinformation.

    Too many people are getting sucked into this vortex. But then again, you facilitate it and receive financial consideration along the way, so in the end why would you want to take partial ownership.

    That’s why you need to heed this message

    John Robb—We are being mentally rewired by the technologies of social networking. It’s an involuntary process. That mental rewiring is forcing a reorganization of society. Those changes are dangerous during the early phases (think: printing press/30-years war)…We might need to shut down Twitter to increase our potential of surviving the first half of this century. Network decision making, in its current raw form, is simply too dangerous.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    , @anon
    @Ron Unz

    If democracy is to work, then shouldn't the voters at least be required to be intelligent enough to distinguish between objective and subjective language? Every politician in the media only use subjective language, which is done solely for the purpose of deception.

    What does it say about a voting population if they even watch the Ashkenazi media in the first place through which they would come across political advertisements? This media is pure fraud and pure Cultural Marxism.

    I wrote the following during Trump's first run for presidency as an example of the type of message a politician would give if both the candidate and voting population were genetically healthy:

    What If I Was Donald Trump?

    I believe in science. So, I believe in evolution and the survival of the fittest: unintelligent people and people with bad genes should go extinct.

    A people with good genes should understand basic logic, reason, objectivity, and the scientific method. As such, as Trump, I would state my goals objectively:

    1) I will deport all illegal immigrants, who are over-represented in crime and the benefactors of welfare services.

    2) I will stop all further immigration until everyone in the USA has a socio-economic status they desire.

    3) I will stop interfering in foreign affairs, since we currently have no foreign threats aside from illegal immigration, and will bring back all our troops and instead place them on our borders.

    4) I will remove the USA from NATO and the United Nations, since neither organization serves America's interests.

    5) I will break up all company monopolies in the USA to encourage competition, innovation, quality improvement, and lower prices.

    6) I will break up the media conglomerates in the USA to allow for more free speech of ideas, facts, and opinions.

    7) I will ban all financial contributions to political candidates. Instead, public funds will be equally provided to any candidate that pass a certain threshold of popular support. This will end the existence of politicians being bribed to serve the interests of certain entities, as opposed to the overall interest of the voters.

    8) I will ban all lobbyists. Any individual, company, organization, or other entity that wants to talk to a politician about supporting a certain law or policy will be required to carry out all communication in front of a public video camera which will be aired live on public television and internet for all to see free of charge, and the conversations will be archived for ever and accessible to any individual.

    9) I will ban any individual from making more than $200,000 a year; any income above that will be taken away as taxes and used for things like the military, police services, public schools, and so forth, and/or put in a public bank for use during emergencies. This is to ensure that no individual becomes too powerful where they can use their financial power to affect laws and public policy that serve their own interest, as opposed to the interests of the voters as a whole.

    10) I will pass a law banning outsourcing of factories and labor; all factories must remain in the USA, and all employees must come from our nation. Also, I will ban the ability of foreign nations to buy American companies. These policies will ensure that the USA has the capacity to be self-sufficient in all things. I will only allow imports of foreign products if for the time being, we ourselves cannot produce the product or service in question, but then I will start implementing policy to make us capable in providing that very product and/or service in question so that we can eventually be self-sufficient in that area.

    11) I will pass a law requiring us to be a peaceful nation, and also if required, cooperate with other nations where it is necessary when dealing with aspects that are shared between nations, such as protocols for interaction in international waters, globally shared resources such as air, and outer-space.

    12) I will support the First Amendment fully, with emphasis on the free exchange of ideas, facts, and opinions. I will abolish "hate-crime" laws; an act of violence or robbery or vandalism is a crime, regardless of why the individual did it. A person who was beaten or killed to steal their property was inflicted with an equal magnitude of crime as a person who was beaten or killed because of his ethnic, sexual, gender, or religous background. I will not penalize thought, just action.

    13) I will support the right of individuals to own firearms for the purpose of self-defense. I believe a person should not be forced to have to fist-fight a burgler, rapist, or murderer. The victim should be given the means to safely stop the perpetrator.

    14) I will pass a law requiring the death penalty for all murderers, rapists, assaulters, robbers, significant vandalizers, and significant fraudsters. No exceptions will be given to people based on who they are (CEOs, politicians, ethnic background, gender, etc).

    15) For a nation to be prosperous, a minimum amount of genetic health must be maintained. As such, criminals will not be allowed to reproduce. Also, chronic welfare recipients will not be allowed to reproduce. Plus, geniuses, scientists, engineers, and other gifted people will be given economic and social incentives to have many children.

    If you support the above laws and policies, then please vote for me. If not, then please vote for my primaries opponents or the Democrat candidate. I need not say any more. The above sums up my views. Either you agree, or you don't. The choice is yours. The future is yours. Good luck.

    Sanjay

    Replies: @Corvinus

  • “President Kennedy’s unfailing support of the cause of Zion Reborn has enshrined his memory in the hearts of our people everywhere,” wrote Los Angeles rabbi Max Nussbaum, president of the Zionist Organization of America and chairman of the American Zionist Council, in a book published in 1965 by the Theodor Herzl Foundation, under the title...
  • There is no doubt that like 9-11, the official Kennedy assassination story is false. Kennedy was better than most Presidents, but no saint. For example, he began the plot that destroyed democracy in Brazil for two decades.

    • Agree: AlexanderEngUK
  • @Anonymous
    Here we go again. It wasn't CIA it was the Jew State. In other news, Squeaky masterminded Helter Skelter and Ravil Mingazov did 911.

    Replies: @Thomas Faber, @JimDandy, @Kinky Friedman, @Realist, @Theophrastus, @CSFurious, @Treg, @anon

    Can’t we get a “hasbara” button?

    • Agree: Lurker, Iris
    • Thanks: P. Cleburne
  • anonymous[111] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wokechoke
    @Colin Wright

    The assassination of Oswald is itself the smoking gun. You know when the smoking gun is a smoking gun held by a jewish gun runner, you've also got a guy randomly filming the event who happens to be Jewish too.

    "Abraham Zapruder (May 15, 1905 – August 30, 1970) was a Ukrainian-born American clothing manufacturer who witnessed the assassination of United States President John F. Kennedy in Dallas, Texas, on November 22, 1963. He unexpectedly captured the shooting in a home movie while filming the presidential limousine and motorcade as it traveled through Dealey Plaza. The Zapruder film is regarded as the most complete footage of the assassination."

    and Ukrainian!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Zapruder

    Replies: @anonymous, @JimDandy

    His hand barely shook when he took that picture. What a sight. I’ve always found the Zapruder film to be suspicious. You can see the right parietal part of Kennedy’s head blown away, but doctors at Parkland mentioned a massive deficit at the back of his head. The possibility exists that his head further disintegrated on the ride to Parkland, and then as he was hurriedly rushed into Trauma Room 1. But I always found a disconnect between what you see in the film, and how his wounds were described later. We’ll probably never know the truth.

    • Agree: AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @anonymous

    If you read through the account his secretary is holding his coat as he films. She was also there to help him stand because he suffered vertigo. Also this is an extremely expensive camera. Was the presence of a Presidential motorcade at the time really such a big deal you'd go through at that trouble to film it? No flinch

    Replies: @Lurker

    , @Anon
    @anonymous

    Regarding the Zapruder film, there is evidence that it, like the moon landing and 9/11 footage, is a fake. Lighting errors, parallax errors, implausible motion, etc.

    https://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?t=1160

    Replies: @Iris

  • @Colin Wright
    I'll grant that Israel had a motive to assassinate Kennedy, and I'll also grant that such a crime would have been entirely in character for her.

    However, there's a distinct lack of actual evidence that she was in fact responsible for the assassination. My wife may have noticed I like the hot new neighbor, and she may even have reason to believe I'm capable of infidelity. However, that doesn't prove I boned the woman; it merely makes it a possibility.

    We practically know Israel deliberately attacked the USS Liberty. It's fact that she was somehow associated with 9/11.

    Can anything equivalent be shown for the killing of Kennedy?

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Justvisiting

    The assassination of Oswald is itself the smoking gun. You know when the smoking gun is a smoking gun held by a jewish gun runner, you’ve also got a guy randomly filming the event who happens to be Jewish too.

    “Abraham Zapruder (May 15, 1905 – August 30, 1970) was a Ukrainian-born American clothing manufacturer who witnessed the assassination of United States President John F. Kennedy in Dallas, Texas, on November 22, 1963. He unexpectedly captured the shooting in a home movie while filming the presidential limousine and motorcade as it traveled through Dealey Plaza. The Zapruder film is regarded as the most complete footage of the assassination.”

    and Ukrainian!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Zapruder

    • Agree: RedpilledAF
    • Replies: @anonymous
    @Wokechoke

    His hand barely shook when he took that picture. What a sight. I've always found the Zapruder film to be suspicious. You can see the right parietal part of Kennedy's head blown away, but doctors at Parkland mentioned a massive deficit at the back of his head. The possibility exists that his head further disintegrated on the ride to Parkland, and then as he was hurriedly rushed into Trauma Room 1. But I always found a disconnect between what you see in the film, and how his wounds were described later. We'll probably never know the truth.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Anon

    , @JimDandy
    @Wokechoke

    Why do you think Ruby did it? Kamikaze Jew? Did he know he was dying or something?

    Replies: @Iris, @Laurent Guyénot, @Wokechoke

  • Anonymous[120] • Disclaimer says:

    Faber, I’m shilling for the Kike State because I impugn their capacity to control a vastly larger nuclear power?

    The Zionazis were in no position to order CIA around or murder their head of state. At the time of the apical coup Israel’s existence depended on US protection. Israel was and is a one-nuke laydown, a sniveling pariah state with no strategic depth or defense industrial base. CIA could swat it like a fly. At any time CIA could cut off Izzies’ aid and their illegally proliferated nukes and RD, instead of lying to conceal the ratline, as Kline did.

    When you watch that girl get chopped in half in Jaws, do you go, “Eek, a remora!” If you are cognizant of the actual, serious research on this apical coup, you know its execution required complete, precise control of all levels of the US government. Izzies did not have that. CIA did and does, in law, regulation, judicial precedent, organization, repressive capacity, and impunity.

    We know how CIA killed Kennedy. Douglass, Salandria are your primers. Some tenuously-employed academic makes up a story with furious handwaving and pictures of LBJ, that’s just catchphrases for morons to parrot. Guyenot never goes near the probative evidence, he just argues in a vacuum from some unspecified and ineffable Jewy mind-control superpower. It’s CIA hack work, same shit over and over.

    • Disagree: P. Cleburne
    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Anonymous

    Israel have whacked several high profile political and scientific figures in their history. Lord Moyne Walter Edward Guinness...

    https://www.theirishstory.com/2021/06/03/the-assassination-of-walter-edward-guinness-lord-moyne-1944/

    Why not get rid of another mick if he's stopping you from building an a bomb in the Negev desert??

    Replies: @Judek

    , @Thomas Faber
    @Anonymous

    In my understanding, it is not possible to trace the real mechanics of power without looking at finance/central banking, and secret societies.

    Specifically, the Jewish Mafia really got to the levers of power in America with the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913; and it was already then well into controlling the press and publishing industries. Freemasonry also, which when Kennedy was assasinated had long been under the sway of the Jewish Mafia, was active and very influential in America well before the time he was killed. All this, and more, amounts to effective control of the CIA at the time in question.

    So, it is in this sense that I see it - the Jewish Mafia wanted him dead, for various reasons. If I remember correctly, he was not happy about going to war with Vietnam, and he was not happy about the Federal Reserve. Either of those reasons would be enough to have him removed from power. As I understand it, it is the Jewish Mafia that Mr. Guyénot talks about when he says "Zionism".

    But insofar as the State of Israel is not the same as the Jewish Mafia (although the Jewish Mafia controls Israel, too), you would be right. At the same time, what particular instrument was used (Mossad, CIA, private contractors) I don't think is that important.

    Replies: @theo dore

    , @David Martin
    @Anonymous

    The work by Salvador Astucia to which Guyenot refers, is full of direct connections between world Zionism and the JFK assassination. The key individual is the Canadian lawyer, Louis Bloomfield. Even the man's Wikipedia page provides enough information to make one suspicious of the man and the Zionists. There's lots more here: https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1981/eirv08n15-19810414/eirv08n15-19810414_032-the_permindex_connection.pdf.

    Astucia takes it a step further, connecting Bloomfield with Edgar Bronfman, arch-Zionist of the ill-gotten Seagrams fortune, a fellow Montreal resident and, according to Astucia, employer of Bloomfield. It's meaty stuff, picking up where Jim Garrison leaves off, not in a vacuum at all.

    Replies: @S, @S

    , @Franz
    @Anonymous


    The Zionazis were in no position to order CIA around or murder their head of state.
     
    The CIA is Israel's branch office in America, for Pete's sake. Where you been?

    They backdated the CIA's start date to 1947. So it wouldn't look suspicious to dullards when Israel "appeared" in 1948.
    , @Realist
    @Anonymous


    The Zionazis were in no position to order CIA around or murder their head of state. At the time of the apical coup Israel’s existence depended on US protection. Israel was and is a one-nuke laydown, a sniveling pariah state with no strategic depth or defense industrial base. CIA could swat it like a fly. At any time CIA could cut off Izzies’ aid and their illegally proliferated nukes and RD, instead of lying to conceal the ratline, as Kline did.
     
    I agree but you are up against a formidable group of Jew-haters, they are not formidable in intelligence...but in numbers. In fact, they are so over the top it leads one to believe there is an ulterior motive.

    Replies: @annamaria, @RedpilledAF

    , @Mr. Grey
    @Anonymous

    I agree but with the blame-the-jew audience for these type of articles you are howling at the wind. This is such a classic case of connecting random dots to tell a story. Of course Israel would have liked greater support from the USA in 1963, but Kennedy was friendly to Israel. This theory is so far-fetched it demands a lot of evidence for it even to be considered, yet this article provides nothing in the way of how Oswald got away with the assasination. Somehow Israel had enough control to kill Kennedy, get away with it and have Johnson implement favorable policies, BUT they didn't have any power to influence Kennedy and were afraid of what he might do regarding the Dimona plant? It's ridiculous.

    Replies: @Laurent Guyénot, @Wokechoke, @notanonymousHere

  • @Anonymous
    Here we go again. It wasn't CIA it was the Jew State. In other news, Squeaky masterminded Helter Skelter and Ravil Mingazov did 911.

    Replies: @Thomas Faber, @JimDandy, @Kinky Friedman, @Realist, @Theophrastus, @CSFurious, @Treg, @anon

    Sounds like Hasbara. First comment, anonymous, and no argument. Just snark.

    Even taking your comment at face value, you don’t think the “Jew State” had any influence on the CIA?

    • Agree: AlexanderEngUK
    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Thomas Faber

    https://newrepublic.com/article/115536/lee-harvey-oswalds-new-york-city-life-was-brief-and-troubled

    The definitive account of a young Oswald in New York. Are assassins plucked from such places and circumstances? The claims in Beschloss and alternatives to those claims are tantalising stuff.

    Replies: @Thomas Faber

  • Here we go again. It wasn’t CIA it was the Jew State. In other news, Squeaky masterminded Helter Skelter and Ravil Mingazov did 911.

    • Replies: @Thomas Faber
    @Anonymous

    Sounds like Hasbara. First comment, anonymous, and no argument. Just snark.

    Even taking your comment at face value, you don't think the "Jew State" had any influence on the CIA?

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    , @JimDandy
    @Anonymous

    Can't we get a "hasbara" button?

    , @Kinky Friedman
    @Anonymous

    It was both CIA, as agent of the WASP Deep State, and Israel/Mossad, which group required the growing number of American Jews who were accepted as part of the American Deep State.

    Jews had hated the Kennedy family since Joseph Kennedy had warned that England backed by Jewish skinny from around the globe was angling for another World War, to destroy Germany forever and to secure the Anglo Imperium globally.

    Anglo Zionist Empire existed long before the 1967 war.

    , @Realist
    @Anonymous


    Here we go again. It wasn’t CIA it was the Jew State. In other news, Squeaky masterminded Helter Skelter and Ravil Mingazov did 911.
     
    It is for sure there is a cabal of rabid Jew Haters on this blog, or perhaps they are troll plants. Their narrative is always the Jews did it.

    It is most likely the CIA was the organization that carried out the assassination...with the recently disposed of Allen Dulles as the instigator.

    Replies: @Truth Vigilante, @Fidelios Automata, @RestiveUs

    , @Theophrastus
    @Anonymous

    Fucking shabbos goy trolls always expose themselves (double meaning intended) by grabbing the first comment.

    Replies: @66thcommentcongrats

    , @CSFurious
    @Anonymous

    I think you should read more books.

    , @Treg
    @Anonymous

    We clearly know by now that the CIA had a big hand in setting up the assassination plot and wanted a second invasion attempt to overthrow Castro. To do that, they had to get rid of JFK.

    See James Files, video confession of the Grassy Knoll shooter. https://www.bitchute.com/video/2J43NkpjZg1F/

    It is clear that a select few inside the CIA, LBJ & Israel, together coordinated with certain individuals in the Chicago mafia who wanted their Casinos back. The CIA played a set-up & clean-up role and Israel played a role to get "their boy LBJ" in place and watch-it unfold role. Israel, who desperately wanted a fundamental US policy change, immediately got what they wanted from their boy LBJ. And we know that LBJ & Israel were behind the false flag attempt on the USS Liberty and later its cover-up. Out of the three interested parties, the CIA, the Mafia, only Israel got what it wanted.

    And by the phrase "their boy", I mean LBJ was "All in for Jews" anywhere and everywhere, despite the fact that it was Jews who first declared war upon Germany. "Their boy" LBJ is said to have
    --"inherited his concern for the Jewish people from his family. His aunt Jessie Johnson Hatcher, a major influence on LBJ, was a member of the Zionist Organization of America. According to Gomolak, Aunt Jessie had nurtured LBJ’s commitment to befriending Jews for 50 years. As a young boy, Lyndon watched his politically active grandfather “Big Sam” and father “Little Sam” seek clemency for Leo Frank, the Jewish victim of a blood libel in Atlanta. Frank was lynched by a mob in 1915, and the Ku Klux Klan in Texas threatened to kill the Johnsons. The Johnsons later told friends that Lyndon’s family hid in their cellar while his father and uncles stood guard with shotguns on their porch in case of KKK attacks. Johnson’s speech writer later stated, “Johnson often cited Leo Frank’s lynching as the source of his opposition to both anti-Semitism and isolationism.”-- https://nationalvanguard.org/2017/05/jewish-site-claims-lbj-was-a-jew/


    Most of all, we should all know by now with dozens of books out on 9/11 (see authors: Justin Raimondo, Michael Collins Piper, Phillip F Nelson, Victor Thorn, Laurent Guyenot, Christopher Ketcham, Mordechai Vanunu, and especially Christopher Bollyn's amazing book "Solving 9-11: The Deception That Changed The World"), and the prosecution of the pedo-pimp Ghislaine Maxwell as "girlfriend" to Jewish American Jeffery Epstein and his "prison cell suicide", that Israel, aims to defeat their enemies via 5 ways: 1) Deception 2) Bribery 3) Extortion 4) Blackmail, and 5) Assassinations.

    This simple but informative essay by Laurent Guyenot is another arrow that helps America First identify just who is using who in the great world of politics.

    Replies: @Iris, @annamaria

    , @anon
    @Anonymous

    Nothing, and I mean NOTHING, brings out the Hasbara / JIDF damage control like this topic.

  • Look at the chart above. The chart explains everything. It explains why Washington is so worried about China's explosive growth. It explains why the US continues to hector China on the issues of Taiwan and the South China Sea. It explains why Washington sends congressional delegations to Taiwan in defiance of Beijing's explicit requests. It...
  • The “US” has been busy degrading its most precious asset, its people, for decades now. Perhaps even over a century. The US has been busy degrading its second most precious asset, its middle class, for decades now. The US has been busy degrading its third most precious asset, its dynamic and productive small businesses, for decades now. The US has been busy degrading its entire culture and civilization by the massive and deliberate policy of replacement of high IQ and highly educated people by low IQ and low education POC from across the entire planet.

    The entire globohomo movement and the march to trannystan has not only degraded the morals of the people, but also the food stock for the US military. The corrupt “US” MIC can no longer produce effective weapons systems in volume nor can it find high quality soldiers required to operate them.

    In light of these simple facts, the assertion that the “US” is trying to maintain is hegemony of power long term is absurd.

    All this war mongering, trade wars and sanction wars are about other goals of a small transnational cabal pulling strings across the planet:
    – The continued preeminence of the US dollar and its use as the primary tool for Judaic
    plundering of the entire planet through their usual practice of usury.
    – The mad march towards androgeny and transhumanism
    – The control of all energy and other resource production across the planet by a small cabal of satanic elites
    – The mass culling of humanity and elimination of all threats to this small cabal

    Russia, Iran and China appear to be unwilling to submit to this cabal and its goals or to pledge fealty to it. The Judaic cabal has one choice: either force Putin and Xi to submit or to give up on everything they have worked for centuries for. Clearly the cabal is willing to take the planet to the brink of nuclear war, and over it, in order to have its way.

    • Disagree: RedNordid1488
    • Thanks: Ann Nonny Mouse
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Brosi

    Brosi,
    I agree with you - the "free market capitalism" is the poison killing America. China and to an extent - Russia are planned economies - run by technocrats actually interested in their countries' working class. America is run by parasites interested only in themselves and their greedy families.
    American parasites are not even wanting to live in America for the long run - they will move to Patagonia, New Zealand or Israel as soon as America goes down. If America is to survive, we need to tax the parasites and reward the actual working class.
    But that will never happen - the parasites in America will destroy this Earth before they accept socialism and their own decline.

    , @Theophrastus
    @Brosi

    Exactly right. This is not about the US "maintaining hegemony" because the US ceased to be a political entity long ago, having been subsumed into Greater Israel. And as we all know, Bibi was quoted as saying that when the chosenites have sucked all the blood out of the US, they will leave the dried-out carcass behind.

    (I don't have enough comments to use the 'Agree' button.)

    , @Anonymous
    @Brosi

    AKA-'Samson-Option'

    , @Hulkamania
    @Brosi

    The American ruling class seems to have put all of their eggs into the basket of transhumanist technological development, which they believed would secure their total dominance over the world in perpetuity. They didn't bother to plan long term because they thought they could just get brain chips connected to AGI and become superhuman before the societal decline they initiated caught up with them.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    , @RedNordid1488
    @Brosi

    You are delusional if you think the Jews don't have a foot on China (Kaifeng Jews) and Russia (Putin it's a Jew itself lol). Massive amounts of Copium from this forum.

  • The redeeming quality of a tense G20 held in Bali – otherwise managed by laudable Indonesian graciousness – was to sharply define which way the geopolitical winds are blowing. That was encapsulated in the Summit’s two highlights: the much anticipated China-US presidential meeting – representing the most important bilateral relationship of the 21st century –...
  • @anonymous
    If a new global system means the end of Rothschild, then I am all for it. However, India is a wild card. As someone else remarked, they have serious jew worship issues. Something tells me that India may be the new lily pad. I also agree with the sentiment that most Americans are blithely disinterested in the decline of their own society as long as they can still bully foreigners at international resorts or act like assholes in Global South countries. As the power goes away, the ability to act grossly with impunity goes away. Couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of assholes. And the British deserve to get ripped a new one also. Was in a SE Asia country many years ago, and the Americans and Brits were first-class assholes from the git-go. Treated the local service staff like garbage and couldn't keep their hands to themselves around the local women. I hope history bends them over and then buries them.

    Replies: @Malla, @Brian Damage

    Treated the local service staff like garbage

    Actually the Imperial British in general treated their “service staff” with far more care and humanity than how the native kings & local elites of the “service staff” had treated them, prior to the Empire and in many cases after the Empire.

    For example I have before you the writing of Michael Francis O’Dwyer GCIE KCSI was a British Imperial officer and later the Lieutenant Governor of Punjab, British India, between 1913 and 1919.
    From his book
    India as I knew it 1885-1925 by Michael O’Dwyer
    https://archive.org/download/in.gov.ignca.13879/13879.pdf

    “A large part of the population were Bhil aborigines, a primitive and simple race, still semi-nomadic. They are great hunters, their favourite weapon being the bow and arrow, with which they will attack a tiger or a panther. ”
    …snip…
    “We had a Bhil Corps at Ladore active, hardy, cheery little men, reminding one of the Gurkhas; and, like the latter, most devoted to their few British officers. In fact the British officer, civil or military, is seen at his best in dealing with these primitive races. The high caste Indian and the Intelligentsia have a lofty contempt for the Bhil. But the British officer takes a paternal interest in these unsophisticated children of nature, learns their language and their ways, tries to wean them from their vices of theft and drink, admires their courage, joins them in the chase; while they on their part give him, for he too is frank, courageous, fond of sport, their affection and devotion. One trembles to think how they and other aboriginal races will fare when India enjoys the blessings of full Swaraj. They will be regarded, and perhaps treated, in the way the Spartans treated the Helots. This is well expressed in the classic description of the Bhils by a Bengali Babu; “ The Bhil is a black man, but more hairy. When he meets you in his jungle, he shoots you in the back with an arrow, and throws your body into the ditch. Thus you may know the Bhil.””

    Also from here
    https://www.victoriainstitutions.com/shrouded/29
    CHAPTER TWENTY NINE
    British colonialism versus American hegemony
    “American hegemony is basically based on firepower and technical skills. There is not much of what one can call a touch of emotional content of the local native people in the far-off nations standing with the American interests. If America goes weak, then they are as good as lost. However, in the case of the British Empire, it would be seen almost all over colonial history that the British side always fought from a weaker, numerically insignificant position. Yet, so much was the emotional fidelity that they received from their local supporters that they managed to outlive the sieges and the initial losses, to come out victorious. To get a small example of this emotional loyalty, one has to read how Robert Clive was given so much emotional support by his Tamil soldiery when they under siege for more than six months. The soldiers informed him that they would forego eating the rice and subsist on the water (kanjivellam) that was usually thrown off after rice is boiled. Food stock had depleted to such levels. Robert Clive came out in flying colours. ”

    • Thanks: AlexanderEngUK
    • LOL: spacewanderer
    • Replies: @Munga Bulga
    @Malla

    So the proud Anglo-Saxon race shouldn't have a problem with Rishi and the millions of hindu coming to the UK then. Such love! Such unity! The UK and India should fuse and become a true Commonwealth again!

    Replies: @Malla

    , @Munga Bulga
    @Malla

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/rishi-sunak-g20-india-visas-b2225196.html

    The Commonwealth shall live again! Rule Britannia! Tremble, world, before the March of the Anglo-Saxon and the Hindu!