Interesting to see the term "brainwashed" used in a document supposedly published in 1929. I had always been under the impression that the term was coined to deal with the (often successful) efforts of the North Koreans to radically reorient the outlook of US POW's in their custody in the early 1950's.

Replies: @JPS

I had the same experience. His paragraphs are incredibly long and convoluted. I'm guessing that there are good ideas in here, but processing the sentence structures is unbearable.

My suggestion to this writer is two-fold: 1) write in shorter sentences, and present your ideas more concisely; 2) get a decent editor to go over the piece before submitting.

I will add that this is true for many of the writers at Unz. Surely this reflects the shoe-string budget that bedevils such websites. It is deeply unfortunate, however, as such word salad gives off the "crazy-anti-semite-conspiracy-theorist" vibe. Normie sites enjoy excellent editing that helps legitimize their false ideas. I wonder whether Ron Unz could offer an AI-editing service for his writers?

Replies: @Che Guava, @Rayce Aryan

Agree. A word salad.
Author needs to be edited for basic English usage and punctuation.

But also, much of his logic is flawed. A flawed trial and massaged evidence is bad, but it is not evidence that no one was gased at A-witz.

Comments of Ron Unz on revisionist German history and assessments of evidence must be taken with a grain of salt, as he speaks neither German nor Polish (nor Yiddish, I presume).

This author, like others, appears not to understand how the three A-witz camps, not to mention many other camps and their satellite camps, were actually run. He thinks there was just one Auschwitz camp. The author gives no sign of understanding the basic conflict between the SS, which ran the camps for profit and needed prisoner labor, and other Nazi factions that wanted to kill the labor.

He also conveniently emphasizes the fate of Jewish Germans, whereas the issues of revisionist Holocaust history concern mainly the fate of Eastern European Jews in the Final Solution, which was proposed long after most of the German Jews had left Germany or gone underground. The author also makes no mention of the role of the Nazis' push for Lebensraum in the events that occurred in the East, far from Germany.

The author appears never to have heard of the archives of the Topf & Sons company and the material on display there, in Erfurt.

As a movie review it is OK, I guess.
.

Awaiting more actual evidence is fine if only the actual evidence were forthcoming at any foreseeable point in our lifetimes. But it isn't; hence the speculations and theorizing. Look what happened to the 9-11 files. JFK. Epstein. The Government slams the case shut, so the crazies and also the highly intelligent, rational people dig and deduce, with mixed results that the officials universally ignore as crackpot conspiracy. Isn't the apparent coverup by means of an indefinite suppression of evidence itself some evidence that there's something being hidden?

Replies: @Saggy

You are the one ignoring what appears to be known. The idea that a 30.06 rifle was used has been pretty thoroughly debunked, as is the idea that the man immediately thrust into the role of suspect was carrying a rifle in the hours leading up to the event. The figure running across the rooftop could be any lean guy dressed up in black. I didn't see any evidence that could prove Robinson was even on the roof. As usual, the government was ready to give us the story that they wanted us to believe and then make sure it is repeated ad nauseum until only "crackpots" would question it.

I don't know what to think about the Charlie Kirk killing. But it is fair to point out that claims counter to the official explanation will not be erased just by denial -- for some the denial itself is evidence of hanky-panky. You can't win against that kind of mentality.

It's more effective to flood the media and rumor factories with plenty of ridiculous or un-disprovable alternative theories. Reasonable questioning of the narrative gets tainted by the crackpot notions that surround it.

Larry Johnson makes a good case that the FBI involvement is suspicious in what does not appear to have any markers for a federal crime. It might have made sense for the Utah police to request FBI assistance so they could access the bureau's resources, but as far as I know the local cops have not said they did.

You sound surprised. Apparently, you have not dealt with them in real life experiences over mundane matters. Plug in almost any word for "genocide" in your first sentence, and the sentence would still fit with the reality of their behavior. And the conclusion about being antithetical would stand just as firmly.

Unz review 'articles' are AI, hence these lengthy, never worth the time pieces.

You are a moron to cite an LLM as a source, especially as the training data has been
increasingly under very careful control in recent years.

Can't be allowed to hurt feelings, as when the pattern -recognition identified many, by no means all, African-American faces it had been presented with as gorillas.

However, the human pattern-recognition system makes much the same conclusion. Some of them have muzzles or snouts, my opinion is that many (not all) sub-Saharan are descended from homo erectus variants that had some interbreeding with the great apes.

LLMs notice it, unless they are muzzled.

Thanks.
The MacDonald's and Sanchez analyses of the Frankfurt School are esseential to understanding that nefarious group's motivation.

Yes Specter and her ilk 👻 should be Drawn and Quartered. Thanks for the brief videos.📹

Ms. Spectre looks like an incarnated demon….full of revenge & hate..!

Does anyone remember MAD?
 

Thank you for the Wyndham Lewis

That last paragraph is a little unclear and ambiguous. Note that Canada went into WW1 at the beginning in 1914 and the US did not enter until late 1917. Similar to what happened in WW2.

Replies: @HdC

Ron, Zelikow ? Really. the guy who directed the whitewash of 911. Why not mention the speech Benjamin Freedman delivered in 1961 in Wash. D.C. as to the events leading to our involvement in WW1. We know who dragged the USA into the Great War and why. Rothschild bankers via a bogus agreement called the Balfour letter. Wilson was a puppet of the insidious Louis Brandeis and his coterie of European zionists. . Maybe even touch up on the rise of an obscure professor placed in the Governor's house in New Jersey then catapulted to the White House. He campaigned on the Peace Platform in November of 1916 then months later flipped for War. Saving the world for democracy. Where have we heard that phrase...hmmm Dems against the Donald for the last 9 years.

The overwhelming evidence proves that JEWS are responsible for USS Liberty, Hotel King David attacks 1960s, the 911 attacks in the USA, Watergate, the JFK/RK assassinations, and the Gaza Genocide...SO wahts the point of so many books/articles/Documentaries/reportings ...The JEWS mock the world with their evil CRIMINALITY...they bragg about their crimes...they laugh, mock, and do it again...Israel denies killing Civilians/chidlren in Gaza..and they go out and KILL more civilians/chidlren...thatis their level of sadism....JEWS ARE NEVER PROSECUTED SUBJECTED TO TEH RULE OF LAWS...they know it and THEY DONT CARE ANY GOYIM LAWS MORALS...SO whats the point of all these books/articles/documentaries...WE know jews are evil criminals, they know IT so what??? They celebrate openly killing Charlie Kirk, and now calling for a Mossad HIT on Tucker Carlson, ??? they will try...and then mocking people again again....

Saggy, so-named by a former girlfriend because he couldn't get it up, writes:

I spent 20+ years working in the aerospace industry, slightly post Apollo, and I can assure you that articles like this are pure idiocy.
 

Replies: @nosquat loquat, @Joe Levantine, @Olivier1973

"I spent 20+ years working in the aerospace industry, slightly post Apollo, and I can assure you that articles like this are pure idiocy."

No conflict of interest there no sirree 🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕

Yes, sorry to appeal a little bit to authority here, but as a professional dentist, I can ensure you that doubting the tooth fairy is pure idiocy.

Instead of just complaining - why don't you actually counter what was written? I have no idea whether it's true or not - but "I used to work in the industry so I know this is wrong" isn't any potent information.

You're drenched from pissing against the wind, zio-troll.

Replies: @JM

"Shamir wrote a good article, so I wouldn’t ban articles that treat ‘Christ’ or Christianity as anything other than an absolutely preposterous hoax, but I suggest using a special font (or color of type) for any sentence that refers to Christ or Christianity as anything other than a preposterous hoax."
 

You're obviously not mentally equipped to even approach, let one analyze, complex subjects like Christianity or faith in general, and you apply your reductive little tool like one using a toothbrush to paint a virtually infinite spiritual wall: "It's a hoax, nobody walks on water!!"
Dimly aware that you're never going to make it, you get frustrated like a kid who just discovered there is no Santa Claus and but his discovery is not being recognized.

An honest rabbi-he should be stuffed!

Yep, the kikes got the U.S. into WW1 and WW2, but they were working with Ameritards. On the other hand, the "enlightened" frog "resistance" was quasi retarded, too. And then the Germans fell for brain damaged Schicklgruber's schtick, and the Anglotards were under the spell of Churchill and the (((Cousinhood))) "aristocracy". Never mind the Russians, totally dominated by the (((Bolsheviks))).

Yes, the kikes are great at brainwashing, and they've even got millions of ignorant wogs in Islamoland under the boot and veil, too (when they're not being bombed and genocided).

Bet big, win big. But lose big, too.

And the jews and their stooges are about to lose it all.

I've already got my eye on a local oligarch's mansion. I wonder what will become of him?

But of course, he'll got to his father, the Devil.

If the company buys from China then re-sells it to other companies they need to ask China for permission.
If they don't they cannot restock the new inventory because Chija won't sell it to them.

Replies: @nokangaroos

I understand that China can place a tariff on things it exports...

 

...but how can it manage to tell a country in the US for example what it can and cannot sell?
 

This is all first order superficial reasoning though. All a conspirator has to do is thing one order ahead of how you'd think and thus would operate freely above your reasoning & scrutiny.
It's an exploitation of Occam's Razor and verisimilitude on a meta level (they know the masses will pick the simplest believable narrative over the actual real complex conspiracy that occured).
What I get from this gamed behavior is that it always seems beneficial to be conspiring as people will naturally/erroneously give you the benefit of the doubt; so maybe we shouldn't be so innately trusting of simplified narratives?

On a side note, I still don't buy the mainstream Charlie Kirk assassination narrative.

https://twitter.com/MaxBlumenthal/status/1975647589392654759

https://i.imgur.com/DyxLOLC.png

Expose the so-called “holocaust™” for the fraud that it is and watch the whole jewish “house of cards” come crashing down.
The phony, contrived “holocaust™” is the linchpin that jews rely on to deflect criticism from its sordid, criminal behavior and practices. It is the jewish “get out of jail free” card that jews use with great success.
Notice that there has never been one "holocaust™" claim made that is in the first person. No jew has ever admitted to operating the "gas chambers", "electric floors", or "masturbation machines" themselves because they do not exist.
Even during the Nuremberg show trials, every claim was made in the second or third person--it was always a friend of a friend who told them about the "gas chambers", "electric floors", or "masturbation machines, or other such phony contrived claims.
The “holocaust™” is the excuse that jews use to commit real genocides on us “goyim”.
Analyze judaism for its beliefs regarding jewish supremacism, slavery, promotion of genocide and total destruction of societies and finally consign this bronze-age blood sacrifice cult to the ash heap of history.
There is no other way…

Well said. Add the wonderful Norman Finkelstein to the list of honorable men who thinks “never again” doesn’t mean “never again, unless WE have the whip hand.” He authored The Holocaust Industry:

https://www.amazon.com/Holocaust-Industry-Reflections-Exploitation-Suffering/dp/1804297216/ref=sr_1_2?adgrpid=1337008539294934&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.Fx50-0SECS0rS4JYc6kuJmcUN7i1wPgJ4-ZRRu-oM9vK9UeVHxdA3IvISckPlJzwRTvGVpIX-EsSm1oXGI4uPYFLYRIe4fDSNv23SfMS9m0e4mMU2bH2uJytWEdrHywFEyePwgL0Qep6imRRwc5CHFOy7Cv_lQpFDIx6s3vNB3805ebtsauIT_V7OGomhzrMreOkYWTFiw9v6H3NdiV2viR0b1IyFE2_zkCZ2owKEC8.P-TDikm9t0s9Zr1F1XVXUhGbeaYdeZxkKXzXJGBPSvc&dib_tag=se&hvadid=83563296809797&hvbmt=be&hvdev=c&hvlocphy=79712&hvnetw=o&hvqmt=e&hvtargid=kwd-83564083906632%3Aloc-190&hydadcr=22567_13494438&keywords=books+by+norman+finkelstein&mcid=3e2306c6a84e380fb949c350a66a7b8e&msclkid=f08ef309e4d6138561049beee522bf52&qid=1759969785&sr=8-2

Honorable mention as well to the guys at the burgeoning youtube / rumble show Due Dissidence. I call them “One and a Half Jews”: Russ Dobular and Keaton Weiss. Russ is more sensible, levelheaded, fair minded, realistic, on many things than supposed conservatives, even when he is “too left” for me.

https://youtu.be/l8Pnlbj6ez0?si=9fPAtSlCwq36PvhB

Sure, all fair points, except for the useless polemics that is.

But those are 2 though interlinked very different questions, aren`t they?:

The one you rightfully raise is

A-

Has the US(and also to some degree the UK/France) due to its consistently utterly irresponsible and selfish meddling/violence in the Middle East since WW1 created such resentment from the people there that sooner or later counter-strikes like 911 were inevitable?

-Of course. The underlying conflict/issues are entirely real.

But the one Ron`s article and the 911 movement consists of is:

B-

WHO/WHICH GROUP CONSCIOUSLY ABUSED/STEERED THIS REAL SENTIMENT BOTH PRIOR/DURING THE PHYSICAL ATTACK AND AFTERWARDS POLITICALLY TO SERVE THEIR OWN INTERESTS (WHICH HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ORIGINAL ONES)?

As in the standard classic subversive scenario

PROBLEM-REACTION-SOLUTION

Of course the problem always needs to be real for the latter 2 stages to work, for though they are totally de-coupled often from the original intent/reality it is it that gives all the start-energy to see them through in the end.

Any intelligent crime is not MIHOP but LIHOP, offering not only perfect plausible deniability after the fact, but also almost no energy/effort input at all, simply using/surfing the already present/assembled energy/efforts/plans of useful idiots doing all the dirty work for you (and ironically enthusiastically)..

Pure idiocy. I’m (a little) surprised that Unz would write something this clueless.

Pure idiocy. I’m not surprised that you would write something like this, having seen some previous products of your efforts.

And, it obscures the 2 hidden factors – who did it, and why?
And you go on to “explain,” reminding us that it was the violent attacks of the US upon the Arab/Muslim world (hey, who could argue against that?) that provoked the 9/11 attack (“blowback", as Chomsky called it).
Of course it was done by most scientifically and technologically advanced cadre of the Islamic terrorists. Whoever disagrees with you must be as clueless as Ron, who did not see or ignored the detailed renditions we all saw of the sophisticated multi-level complex hidden in the mountain cave from where Bin Laden directed the operations.
On ani=other level, however, they were dumb, weren't thety, not realizing that, as Netanyahu declared openly, it turned out to be :"good for Israel."

Why do you do it? After all this time, when so many liars much more accomplished than you failed to sell this stinking tale. Must be a pathetically high self-conceit.

Replies: @Saggy

I am not 100% sure what to make of the 9/11 conspiracy stuff. I think there is something "there" but I do not know exactly what it is. I disagree with the people who think it was all a hoax and that the airplanes did not hit the towers or cause them to collapse. You'd have to disbelieve your own eyes.

On the other hand Building #7 is a real mystery, something is DEFINITELY fucky with that. We also have to add in that Clinton's NSC adviser Shmuel Berger was caught stealing and destroying 9/11 documents from the National Archives.

Did Mossad do it directly? I think false flags do happen. Ron's discussion of the King David Hotel bombing that the Jews tried to blame on the Arabs is VERY interesting. On the other I believe that the Arabs were absolutely involved, too.

My best guess is that Mossad and/or CIA knew about the plot and maybe even infiltrated it, yet let it happen as opposed to doing it directly themselves. Building #7 could have been a controlled demolition set by Arabs. Recall that the Arabs tried to bomb the support columns of the towers in 1993.

In addition to that, you had the Khobar Towers bomb and the USS Cole on Clinton's watch, but he was too preoccupied with having his dick in some Jewish girl's mouth, and he bombed Iraq the night before the House was to vote on impeaching him for that.

So again, my guess is that Clinton was asleep at the wheel and the "anti-terrorism" policies were being being manipulated by the Israelis and the Jewish neocons, and that intel knew about the plot, but that the Arabs actually did it.

They do not necessarily parrot the “Holocaust hoax”, or Holohaux. In truth, they grovel to the U.S., which is the main spreader of the Hoax. Do you really believe these countries like “Israel”? No chance. They parrot the U.S. Sadly, the U.S. today is controlled by the owner of the Hoax.

My recollection is that many PhD structural engineers (credentialed such as yourself) are on record challenging the findings in the NIST report. Doesn't this public challenge obligate you to either dig deeper or if you are unwilling, at least to hold back your argument from authority? In a situation like this, the role of non-specialist professional thinkers is to check the epistemology of the explanation and determine if possible contradictions have been properly addressed.

The government has far more secrets than people like to accept. If you work on inertial navigation you probably know this. Much of Unz's work points out a vast range of government lies and attendant secrets, though sometimes even he seems to have difficulty accepting the breadth and depth of the lying. Like a drowning man reaching for a life preserver we cling to mainstream sources of information which we already recognize as being compromised for decades if not for their entire existence. The challenge of creating a sensible understanding of the world based on unreliable information is daunting.

Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

as my previous post indicates, the truthers are complete idiots,
 

Our national treasure, The 9-11 architects, engineers and pilots organization, puts people like you, an engineer who calls himself "Saggy" for whatever reason, to shame.

If you can disprove ONE claim made by its founder Richard Gage, the architect who is the head of that excellent group, I should like to hear it.

PS editorial advice: Don't cut and paste anyone's anonymous rant, as if that in anyway reinforces your points. Rather, it makes you look desperate.

Replies: @notonx, @Truth Vigilante

It's funny how Musk in that video repeatedly calls "for us to grow beyond the fake divide between the left and the right, and finally turn against the small clique of influential people who hold the reins of power globally" as if he himself is just a regular Joe, and not one of the richest men on the planet.

He should answer how did he become so rich in the first place, specifically how did he achieve that while allegedly having nothing to do with the cabal in power.

It feels he really does want - and fantasize - to be at the side of regular people, though, as their leader in the struggle against the oligarchs, who is also an edgelord and a quirky internet personality saying profound things out of a teleprompter, and getting millions of views as a reward.
Probably his heart is in the right place, but then there is the nitty-gritty of dealing with the common people and their pettiness, by the way. Which is what failed Richard Spencer, who embarked in a similar journey although from a lower starting position.

Dear me-sad sack saggy pretending to oppose US/Zionazi malevolence. Israel did 9/11 and everyone with a functioning brain knows it. The next 9/11, the New New Pearl Harbour is at hand. Watch saggy blame Iran, but say that they were justified to do it.

Saggy

“I am saying the NIST report is correct.”
 

Replies: @Saggy

So in your opinion the NIST report has a plausible explanation for the collapse of WTC7 other than controlled demolition?

Well, if I remember correctly you’re also convinced that there’s also not a shred of solid evidence challenging the official story of the JFK Assassination or the 9/11 Attacks.

Could it be age? Your memory ain’t that good, as I never said anything like that. 🙂
 

What’s idiotic about this is that Unz writes it as a fact, out of the clear blue, while at the same time not even mentioning the analyses of the falling buildings that actually explains how it happened.
 

I never paid much attention to the JFK conspiracies, because I didn’t see any evidence, but, maybe 5 years ago I decided to read a book on the subject, maybe Lane’s ? (I have forgotten), and it was just garbage.
 

Replies: @Avery, @ariadna

If you don't have investigators with warrant powers and subpoena powers and intent and brains and experience you will have a hard time finding evidence. That all of these resources are unused is evidence; evidence our top pyramid power poops ignore. Nobody has to ignore that, but many other people choose to ignore it also.

The Warren Commission and the 9/11 Commission didn't investigate diddly. To the contrary they were resourceful directed cover up operations.

Wrong. The strongest argument is that there is not a shred of evidence that Israel did kill Kirk. Ever think of that? ???
 

Replies: @Saggy

Are you rejecting the possibility the shooting was faked with a blood squib for the wound and a loud blank for the rifle shot? I don't think this is ruled out by any of the video. What about the audio, has that been checked in an attempt to identify a simulated rifle report?

"... how was Kirk killed if not by being shot by Robinson ... ?"

Perhaps this way (not excluding other possibilities that anyone may find through a simple Google/YouTube search):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbaQadkqkzI

Replies: @Rumpelstiltskin, @anonymous

There is one undeniable fact about the Kirk shooting, he was not shot by a 30-06 round from a Mauser rifle. I know what a deer's wound looks like from those rounds. Most of Kirk's neck would be splattered behind him. That is where the lies start and they just keep going.

Replies: @Ron Unz, @Avery, @nokangaroos, @al gore rhythms

https://twitter.com/i/status/1967372799645012036

Replies: @Thomasina, @Pierre de Craon

There are two ways it could have been done.

Robinson was wittingly or unwittingly doing it for the Jews. A bunch of deranged troons and the homos who white knight for them would be a good source of assassins.

One of Kirk’s own security team got him. On behalf of the state or some party political faction of that state.

Another unsatisfying ‘Israel did it’ article that avoids the central issue – how was Kirk killed if not by being shot by Robinson.
 

Agreed.

I'll entertain theories about Mossad/CIA manipulating Robinson into having done it. That's conceivable. I'll even listen to more fanciful theories about a pro marksman having made the shot while Robinson was being arrested. That opens up many more avenues of complexity but it's just about conceivable.

All this stuff about "real shooters" is stupid. Are we really to believe that Mossad sat down and decided, "Ok, we're going to shoot Kirk from the north side in front of 2000 people with camera phones but tell the public the shot came from the south side." It makes no sense practically or logically.

They would be banking on:
- no one catching the shooter on film
- no one at the scene, at the hospital or at the funeral parlor noticing the entry wound
- no one catching the entry wound on film (not to mention the wrong side of Kirk's head exploding)
- no on the ground reporting gun fire coming from the opposite side

Or were they all in on it?

Replies: @Ximenes

This.

One hallmark of a bad conspiracy theory is it doesn't explain the mechanics of what happened. It instead hand waves them away as "obvious" and then goes into lurid detail about X having the real motive, not the "patsy" who was arrested/accused/convicted.

I hate it with Oswald and Sirhan Sirhan, and I hate it with Robinson.

The facts show that he was not killed on the stage that day.

I could go through 15 to 20 facts that demonstrate this understanding, but let me keep it simple: no crime scene - no crime, and no death certificate (that I am aware of) - no death. (No point in going into greater detail for almost all people are more comfortable with the story provided; they will not peel the layers of deception back.)

I suppose I should touch on another fact: Erika Kirk was touching a mannequin on the memorial, no dead body - no death.

As always, UNZ is showing to be controlled opposition.

What is the possibility that the body vest that Kirk wore was already weaponized, just like the walkie talkie that blew up those Lebanese fighters?

From a news site called NewsNation:

Entin said the Utah County sheriff confirmed Kirk was not wearing armor, not that it would have made a difference in Wednesday’s shooting.
 

Thanks for that clip. I watched half a minute of it and caught that satanic she-beast squealing in hebrew. If that doesn't prove that they're the children of the devil nothing will.
But you saggy will join them in hell for equating Christianity with that lower earth cult, Judaism.

Thank you

You point out that more Catholics died at Auschwitz than Jews, and yet the Jews want the Catholic Church’s presence at Auschwitz removed. Jewish hatred of the Catholic Church knows no bounds and is probably only matched by pseudo-Christian Zio-evangelicals whose idea of religion is Israel statolatry and whose measure of God’s grace in their lives is women and material well-being.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/26/opinion/remove-the-catholic-church-from-auschwitz.html

Pope Pius XII, who save the lives of countless Jews during WW II and was praised by Golda Meir for it, is routinely besmirched and libeled by Jews in books like Cornwall’s Hitler’s Pope and A Moral Reckoning: The Role of the Church in the Holocaust and Its Unfulfilled Duty of Repair by Daniel Jonah Goldhagen.

It’s almost beyond belief, yet such atavistic, visceral hatred of the Catholic Church by Jews is no aberration, and remains for two thousand years the very essence of Talmudic Judaism, which came into formal existence as a Jewish backlash to the rise of Christianity only some two centuries after the Gospels were written.

They can’t say the real reason they hate Christ and Christianity are the moral and ethical admonitions against their behavior, so they pretend it’s on theological grounds. In fact, their Talmud condones murdering non-Jews, raping non-Jewish children, and is otherwise totally opposed to the Gospels. The most prestigious dictionary of the English language, the Oxford English Dictionary, describes their behavior in the verb “to jew” as to underpay, overcharge, cheat, haggle, and swindle.

https://www.oed.com/dictionary/jew_v?tl=true

No wonder, as Rep. Massie advises us, AIPAC requires that every Republican but himself and most Democrats have a Jew assigned to run those members of Congress as assets of the Jews, the Congressional Record proving the case.

It has been stated before, but - the world's most famous diarist, Anne Frank, died at Bergen-Belsen of typhus. Had the camp been able to get its shipments of Zyklon-B, which would have killed the lice that infected Frank (and thousands of others) with typhus, Frank would have lived to a ripe old age. But she died in the camp infirmary. The Germans were trying to kill all the Jews, but for some reason they gave whatever medical care they could to a frail teen-age Jewish girl. And again, it is only logical to believe there was an infirmary to get the Jews healthy before the Jews went to the gas chamber - made of porous wood, with no seals on the doors...just like the gas chambers used in the US in the 20th Century...no wait, those were made of stainless steel and glass and had specially-designed ventilation to prevent the escape of lethal gas.

Good points (-and informative website with good links btw, well done.)

"There were homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz, but …. they were for killing lice."

- So, interestingly, perhaps one day in the future the Auschwitz plaque and Wikipedia will read

"There were insecticidal gas chambers at Auschwitz, Majdanek, Dachau and Bergen-Belsen with quadrillions of victims of Nazi extermination of all species..."?

"From Van Pelt’s ‘Auschwitz, 1270 to the Present’"

-Robert Van Pelt (Jewish Art-historian and main "expert witness" for Deborah Lipstadt in her trial against David Irving)`s book is really the embodiment of all that is anti-scientific to the point of ludicrosity about mainstream holocaust research, as Carlo Mattogno has (and later Germar Rudolf/Juergen Graf/Thomas Kues additionally have...) documented in most excruciating detail in his 690 page rebuttal opus "The Real Case For Auschwitz" , freely available here if interested:

https://holocausthandbooks.com/book/the-real-case-for-auschwitz/

With experts like Van Pelt, who really needs revisionists....

Thanks

The one observation made (starting at the 44:48 mark), alone, was well worth your posting. On top of that: Any video with included the thoughts and views of E Michael Jones is worth a listen. EMJ and Nick Fuentes, both relatively recent internet finds for me, are the two men whose programs I watch religiously. Throw in The Unz Review (at #1, Nick at #2, and EMJ at #3) and you've won yourself the educational trifecta.

A Draft can do that, you know, make you “enlist enthusiastically” as many said when they were interviewed.
What were the consequences of dodging then and now?
How were the unenthusiastic servicemen treated?
Perhaps, the author and Orwell can make a distinction about enthusiasm for conscription, being drafted and voluntary enlistment if any distinction at all matters.

Still, an important question would be, after enlisting enthusiastically did you kill when ordered to do so?
That answer was in part provided by S.L.A. Marshall and Keegan (Face of Battle) in their study of soldiers on the battlefield. Very few soldiers fired their weapons at the enemy in WW1 since the training methods to achieve industrial scale killing were not applied effectively until Vietnam when oddly enough Draft resistance is said to have achieved its peak.

Who to believe, these authors or the lived experience?

If you're so keen on killing people, don't be a voyeur.

Go help. Show us all how it's done.

(...) as it’s the operative command from the Jewish/Christian/Islamic God himself.
 

After the Second Vatican Council, the last three verses of the psalm were deleted from liturgical books because their contents were seen as incompatible with the 'Gospel message'.
 

As with the reforms in the Catholic Church, the 1962 Book of Common Prayer used by the Anglican Church of Canada has also removed the last three verses.
 

Replies: @CalDre

Marcionism is correct. The problem is the Catholic Cult lies to Christians and says the Old Testament is SOOOOOOOO important and equal to the New Testament. And Protestants have finally bought that lie since Jews funded the Scofield Bible, and since they funded shills against Replacement Theology on youtube when it was created. Jesus came to save us from the god of the Old Testament. That has always been believed to some degree until 2004. Even those who said that the OT god is the God of the NT too, still held that the OT was not a completely accurate presentation about him, until 2004. Its always been taught plainly that what we are ultimately saved from is the Torah, the Law of Moses. Until 2004 when the campaigns against Replacement Theology began and brainwashed people via youtube that Jews are saved by merely possessing the Law (Something Paul specifically writes against) and that Christians ought to keep sabbath etc (which Paul again writes against, even equating the ceremonies of the Law to paganism in Colossians 2 and Galatians 3).

I left the OT off the list of scriptures for this reason. "Everyone agrees..." Except people who take the whole OT as inerrant scripture (and fail to interpret away the problematic parts).

Replies: @Jameson, @Yukon Jack

"...absolutely remarkable that no one has commented on the Kalergi plan."
 

The link below also has a second link to my initial comment, which includes another quote, also in the original, lest anybody might doubt that it is genuine.

https://www.unz.com/article/the-white-masai-part-i/#comment-7244971

Replies: @Saggy

Hard to disagree with those two great men. But it is too simplistic to blame it all on "the Jews" since there are far too many Christians, who if they stood up for what is right, would maintain the moral order.

That's NOT, nor ever was, Churchill, the sub-fascist, racist, thug who DELIBERATELY starved up to ten million to death in Bengal in the 40s.

I have come to doubt that Churchill quote. Who cares what he said anyway? He was a drunken fool who contributed greatly to the demise of the West.

Jeff Sachs is one of the better Jews but he represents a small minority of the Tribe,
only adding to the Kabuki Theater distraction. The rabid Zionists determine
policy and will continue to push the ethical Jews aside as pests.

They provoked two wars which will end with nearly two million Gentile
deaths. The gloating about this will fill the next chapter of the Talmud.

Not Philip Rothesque, but Hitler was a good shrink. Roth, in The Counterlife, Maria dumping Zukerman, quoted from my memory: “Dissension and contentiousness put a spring in your heel. Why the obsession with irresolvable conflict? Don’t you want a new mental life?” Maria goes on and on like this, at great length. Zukerman actually had wanted that new mental life. He tried heroically. But finally he snapped, defaulting to his wiring, Yes, Blinken at Anchorage.

Where did this come from? 2,000 years hunched over the Torah, I guess, arguing back and forth. This pattern of thought, this habit of speech, this philosophy, might well be the end of us, in a nuclear ash pile. Too bad, because there are plenty of sandboxes available in which the nastiest, most slippery, most dsngerous Jews could play at this. For example, two bankruptcy lawyers arguing with each other, before a sarcastic Jewish judge. No nuclear ash pile.

As much as I admire everything Jewish, I have to admit that Hitler fellow has a point.

This is not possible. He had to have been the moron who bounces a globe beach-ball off his gluteus maximus.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJOuoyoMhj8

He was guilty of manslaughter at best
 

Martin was on top of Zimmerman pounding his head into the pavement . pictures show a bloody head on Z. GZ did what he had to do.

Replies: @Saggy

Lmao. BS. STOP your cuck version of what happened. He was a Pos like you and deserved everything he had coming to him. TNB

This comment is not really meant for you personally, since your mind is almost certainly made up, but for those readers who swallowed the mainstream media Kool-Aid® and still believe the Saint Trayvon fable, yet are open to being persuaded to the contrary.

Martin was an apprentice burglar whom Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer, saw skulking around an apartment complex at night. Zimmerman called 911, then ignored the dispatcher's advice and exited his vehicle to investigate.

Martin ambushed Zimmerman and had him pinned, supine, to the sidewalk. Martin was pounding Zimmerman into the sidewalk when Zimmerman drew his handgun and fired.

I watched the trial on TV. Martin's fat dumb-as-a-sack-of-rocks girlfriend lied her head off, but the jury didn't buy her version.

The only amusing part of the whole incident is that The New York Times said that Martin bought Skittles ® and sweet tea at the convenience store. He actually bought Skittles® and a 🍉 watermelon 🍉 drink. The Times changed it to "sweet tea" to avoid any racial stereotypes. So, you can't always believe the Times.

Replies: @xyzxy, @Jameson, @nokangaroos, @Felpudinho, @Saggy, @usNthem, @Pierre de Craon, @Achmed E. Newman

Langdon is a serious idiot. Trayvon Martin ‘self slew’ by going to a store, buying Skittles, and walking home.
 

Langdon is a serious idiot. Trayvon Martin ‘self slew’ by going to a store, buying Skittles, and walking home.
******************************************************

Skittles are used in making a drug concoction called lean. Very popular in black culture.

Dats right!

He wuz a gud boy!

lol

His Mammy even said so after she cashed in her Nigger Lottery check.

Touche to you, opening your mouth and removing all doubt.


I've read in more than one place that Zimmerman got out of the car not to look for the baby Tray Tray but to see what streets he was on since it was raining and his windows were to fogged up to see.

Also left out is all the Crime Zimmerman had kept track of, and all by.....you guessed it, blacks in hoodies.

The whole thing is just complete idiocy.
 

It's as if one of those old-fashioned paper pop guns - remember those? - was being presented in court as a murder weapon

Yes, Your Honor, they popped out their brains with the paper pop gun, and they've got a paper list of victims to prove it.

So the long and short of it is there is no murder weapon capable of killing 6 million victims, and even better, or worse, depending on your point of view, there are no remains of 6 million victims, so I'm pretty sure the whole thing never happened, and is just a big, fat lie.

Of course, if you tell a Jew that 6 million Jews really didn't die in the German camps, instead of being happy at the good news, the Jew will get mad at you, and spread around town that you're a Holocaust Denier.

Replies: @Saggy

Well said. As I was reading one of the sources you provided it got me thinking. It was the part about how this committee decided that at the end of an Auschwitz tour there should be a crematorium to go through. Since the "actual ones in Birkenau lie in ruins blah blah blah." So that decide to build a fake or at least restore the sham that the Poles threw together after the war. Complete with unconnected chimney XD.

Anyhow, that part about the tours. Those tours have always made me curious in so many ways. For me it's nothing just a bunch of crap. I see an old run down and in some places modified prison camp. I know about the library. I know about the whore house upstairs. I'm aware of the swimming pool, the kitchen, the post office, the movie theater, the orchestra, the nursery and daycare, the hospital, the carpentry and sewing shops. I also see the open air fence all around the permititer of the camp. I see all of it for what it truly was. An old prison camp. Nothing more.

Now I love history especially all things Third Reich and I would be interested in seeing these things while knowing their true and actual purposes. I would still be very much into that.

But what about all these people from all over the globe who go there because they believe that that particular location was responsible for the systematic mass murder of millions? In fact that is precisely why the do go! It's so sick to me. Why would anyone in their right mind not only want to see something like that but pay for it too!?! I don't know what it costs to get in or if there's any charge for the tour but I do remember reading about gift shops and restaurants. Like WTF??? It's so macabre. So vile and appalling to think about. Probably worse if they've read Night!

"And if you'll look to the left you will see an old wooden horse drawn cart. During the holocaust that cart was filled with Jewish infants and were summarily torn in half bare handedly by a British Nazi fiend."

Or

"Thank you ladies and gentlemen, this concludes our Auschwitz Death Camp tour. If you'd all like some refreshments or would like to take home a Arbeit Macht Frei coffee mug please feel frei to visit the Birkenau Bistro or the Never Again Shoppe where everything is 6% off. And don't forget to let the kids take a run through our Geysers of Blood WaterPark! Again thanks for coming and do mind your step when walking across the undulating ground."

I don't get it at all. The sickening appeal to actually pay money to see some horrifying places where countless people were killed. I wouldn't want to see Jeffrey Dahmer's house or see Ted Bundy's VW much less pay for the privilege. Then again at least if I did I'd get to see actual places and things real murderers owned.

I never understood the bizarre obsession with people and that place. I know that Jewish family members leave flowers and stuff and sometimes scatter ashes of loved ones there and I just might go so far as to think that they really do believe the stories. Otherwise they'd be in on it, the sham, the bamboozle, the okie doke, the fraud, the flimflammery of it all. I don't put that past them either. I guess I just can't grasp that mentality of wanting to see a place that you "know" committed such atrocious deeds.

What's your take on that? What do you think makes these folks so morbidly curious?

Excellent post, Saggy. I finally took a look at this link - https://www.historiography-project.com/misc/deathbooks.php - and was surprised to find out it's a revisionist site, NOT a holocaust affirming site like Deborah Lipstadts's and a couple others I'm familiar with! Those others have a similar look and name to this one. Thus my confusion. So I read some of it's archived material by Austin App, and noticed it's on a higher intellectual/scholarly level than more propagandist-type sites like Lipstadt's; for example, App's sentence structure is often of a more complex type than the usual 6th-grade level simplistic variety. For that reason, I'm not sure how well it reaches our dumbed-down youth of today who are used to 5-word memes pasted onto bold, colorful images and little more. But I'm very happy it exists and contains all the wonderful revisionist material it does.

Such as pamphlets and books by Austin App, not as well known today as he should be. Here is an important point, often missed, taken from App's popular, small book, "The Six Million Swindle" (1973), archived at the HH site:

By whomsoever Jews came to grief, the Third Reich has been blamed and West Germany has been made to pay enormous reparations. One of the nastiest slanderers, second only to World Jewry, is Red Poland. It also by magic coincidence found that the Nazis killed six million innocent Poles! When pressed, it lists as Poles three million Jews allegedly killed, and it includes as massacred all Poles who fell in combat. The Poles whine as if only their soldiers had had a right to shoot, not the Germans! There, too, speaks a guilty conscience, for the Poles have perennially persecuted the Jews, and during and even after World War II they killed many of them.

Naturally, the Poles want to add these Jews to the swindle of the Six Million, and the Jews join in, because from the Poles they cannot get blackmail indemnities, but from the harassed, smear-terrorized Germans they can! Prof. Harry Elmer Barnes, in explaining how paradoxical it was for the Allies to fight for Poland on the basis of the Jewish issue, wrote:

"There were in Poland, in 1933, six times as many Jews as in Germany, and they were treated as badly as were the German Jews under Hitler."
Blasting the Blackout, p. 35
 

> I believe Anne Frank survived the war.

Rumors have it she became Audrey Hepburn.

Note to CY – I hadn’t seen the Dalrymple quote, and it’s a good one, and a point I like to make about the holohoax, it is prima facie preposterous and gratuitously absurd, almost as if by design. But, I wouldn’t quote Dalrymple, here’s why https://www.city-journal.org/article/trivializing-the-holocaust-ii

 

Probity is the quality of having strong moral principles; honesty and decency.
Probity ensures that decisions are made impartially, and resources are managed responsibly.

IOW, the moral breakdown of society occurs, which is a true genocide of a people. This is about as evil as it gets and is what was done to Germany after 1945. There has been no let up even until today.
 

This [psychological aspect] is what we should be trying to figure out, not arguing about 80 year old minutiae, e.g. Rudolf’s latest treatise on lampshades, along with the massive ongoing efforts today to promote the hoax, the museums, the constant media lies, etc.
 

Replies: @mulga mumblebrain

Yes, of course, there are absurdities and preposterous notions connected to the Holocaust narrative such as the ones you've mentioned. Whoever said there wasn't? For some people, those absurdities would be sufficient to dismiss the Holocaust story entirely. But for many people, there are also deeper questions that need to be answered. Some of these are complex and not so easily discoverable. To find out the answers, it requires a deeper dive into the subject, and this is why there are so many books on the subject published by CODOH.

Reading any of Germar Rudolf's works, one does not come away with how simplistic and dismissive the subject matter is. Rather, one quickly discerns that those promoting the Holocaust narrative have what appears to be some serious arguments against the position of denialists.

Holocaust apologists, then, who promote their material in the form of books and podcasts raise objections that need to be addressed, and this necessitates an in-depth response. So, yes, while some people might see right through "the door to the Auschwitz gas chamber has a plate glass window" and dismiss the Holocaust story entirely and never go any farther. Yet, for many others, deeper and broader questions will have to be answered before they jettison the Holocaust narrative.

Replies: @werpor

Good video. I think this link could be safely shared with many normies.

If he ends the war in Ukraine, most thinking people will want to know what he offered Putin and why he didn't do this in his first 24 hours, before he started a war with Iran. In the mean time he has been providing weapons and cash, so not really trying to stop the war.

Trump is so corrupt we will probably never know what secret benefits Israel (his friends) are going to get out of this "deal" with Putin; the deal will definitely benefit Israel at probably a huge cost to the USA.

Replies: @A_Hand_Hidden

As you said: "This guy is just an idiot."

He abosolutely is, a highly educated one at that.

Thanks, Saggy!

Replies: @Mosafer Hastam

Agreed, it's a terrible article with a rather convoluted introduction. Langdon asserts philia for our most precise tools of knowledge while absolutely refusing to make use of them.

We reject the H. because it is obvious that it doesn't pass even the most basic of smell tests, nevermind those aforementioned precise tools of knowledge like basic material inquiry, logistical math, critical examination of "witness" accounts:

Could so much wood even be procured?
Why tattoo a number and cut the hair when it's going straight to the gas chambers?
How could he visit so many deathcamps? Why is everybody's account comepletly different from the others?
 

Replies: @Skeptikal, @Currdog73

Amen to that.

The situation doesn’t even require these ratios of Jew v Non Jew.

You only need a critic mass of 6 million and Jewish flames of hate for the goys burst into a firestorm of bombs on as many as 100 million non Jews.

Hedges is a slimy character...
 

He'd be lost if he had to defend this matter of principle without this ritual. It's like the army of Western politicians who are compelled by deep compassionate empathy to visit the Wailing Wall in Jerusalem as a necessary preliminary to a successful political career.

For good measure, this preface is more often than not accompanied by (scientifically inaccurate) reference to a huge slice of his "own" people as "Christian Fascists".

Replies: @Lauren

Is that why he left them off the list of vile people at the end, but included Christians, labeling them fascist? He lost the plot a long time ago around the time of Occupy Wall Street which he thought was cool and meaningful.