Hillary Clinton.
Still, what other options do establishment democrats possess? Hillary is old, but that didn’t stop the party from running with dementia Joe. If Biden were to step down tomorrow, only the Clinton faction could start up a emergency campaign this late in the game. I’m not saying she’s gonna win, I’m just saying it’s the best (least crappiest) option the DNC has going for it.
One of the reasons the DNC is in the pooper is on account of Hillary purging any decent potential rivals leading up to the 2016 Presidential election. Potential heavy hitters are still terrified of getting between her and a Obama faction scuffle. This is a horrible position for the Democratic Party to be in. It would be better to just let Trump win. Use anti-Trump hysteria to get funding for a makeover.
Since when did that matter? The question is she better than someone with ongoing dementia/Alzheimer’s.
There are plenty of pro-Clinton operatives within the Democratic Party and Washington establishment. Her getting the nomination wouldn’t be terribly difficult if Joe were to step down. Also, many Democrats would vote for her anyway to prevent Trump from being re-elected.
And you believed her?
2020 wouldn’t have worked for her. I suspect the whole Jeffrey Epstein thing was dropped at that time to prevent Hillary from becoming the VP for the Democratic candidate. But now things are different. There’s no other viable candidate to step in for Joe. She’s hoping for the Democrats to beg her to run. (Better yet no Bernie this time around.)
She’s baaaaaack!
There are no good options, only really bad ones. I’m thinking a Trump vs. Hillary rematch is very much on the table. Sounds more plausible than RFK, Newsom, or “Big Mike” getting into the ring.
I thought that fairly recent Curtis Yarvin interview with Red Scare went very well.
One of these days I’ll write a cool R. Kelly’s “Trapped in the Closet” parody featuring Steve Sailer and the iSteve universe.
(Due to copyright issues I guess you can’t find the original R. Kelly video, but here’s a GTA 5 video game reenactment that’s ok.)
The man seems more like an actor than anything else.
Well, he was a (substitute) drama teacher.
I would pay money to see Justin Trudeau play Fidel Castro. The man seems more like an actor than anything else.
Well, he was a (substitute) drama teacher.
The man seems more like an actor than anything else.
Don’t forget environmental legislation, which became a big deal in the 1970s and 80s. The reason we in the developed world get to preen ourselves over how clean our water/air/food/etc is, is because we exported all of our polluting industries to Asia.
It's weird how many people have a certain kind of courage, to take their chances among bullets, shells, and IEDs, yet it's either too much politeness, or the lack of a different kind of courage to just resist they enemy at home.
... if you’re white, especially if you’re a white Southerner or Midwesterner, don’t fight for a regime that hates you, regardless of who holds the Presidency. Don’t fight for a system that openly states that disempowering you, enslaving you, and then exterminating you are its highest moral goals. When will white idiots learn, if you can’t help yourselves then at least don’t help the bear.
Next time they force your group into the Diversity Enrichment seminar, you just say NO. Yes, they will aim to fire you instead of AT you, but just as on a battlefield, you need to stick together. It’s a different kind of war.
I quit my last corporate job about 15 years ago. Have since been 100x more successful working for myself than I ever would have been working for someone else.
Nonetheless, before I quit, I dodged mandatory “diversity training” for an entire year. At least 6-8 times by my count. Kept signing up and then coming up with excuses not to go at the last minute. (And truthfully, the excuses were legit – my time was much more valuable and important than sitting in a classroom doing bullshit indoctrination stuff)
By the time I finally resigned to pursue other opportunities, the training situation had progressed to “possible discipline up to and including termination”. Despite all the money I made them and everything else I accomplished at that company, I still consider avoiding that “training” to be my greatest accomplishment during my time there.
In other words: scare away the very type of people a functioning army is build upon.
Well, just imagine the comedy goldmine that will appear when the regime lands us in a three-front WW3 against Russia, China, and Iran.
I’m sure with some Midwest ingenuity they could make some narly IEDs.
I think that’s why DOD is playing around with robot pack mules and exoskeletons.
https://www.dogster.com/lifestyle/robot-dog-cujo-military-marines-training-missions-videos-pictures-photos
There are so many stories of patrols hiking for days with 80lbs rucks. It’s no wonder there’s such a high number of foot, knee, and back problems. Had a family friend who worked at the local VA who’d talk about it occasionally.
BTW, Mystery Ranch backpacks are awesome!
Worrying about post-service physical problems is actually somewhat legitimate. Infantry carries a lot of gear, and unlike in the past, troops aren’t allowed to ditch the items they don’t think they’re going to need. A relatively large number of ex-grunts are on full or partial disability due to ruined joints.
Most military jobs don’t have that issue, though.
I assume your talking about South Africa?
Regardless, if China, Russia, and India are creating its own rival geo-strategic sphere if influence and financial system it’s time to pay attention.
Obnoxious little shit-lib free market guy isn’t he? I watched this two days ago and it was “unfortunately, we can’t import any more Latin Americans because those countries are tapped out” and “Chinese labor just isn’t as cheap as it used to be.” He’s a NeoLiberal lamenting on the collapse of the globalist project. He sees the blood on the wall, Russia, China, India, etc, all want out of the US dollar system and are creating their own international system via BRICS. The US can’t pay its 30+ trillion debt and foreign countries are disturbed by the LGBT bullshit. A country that actively encourages it’s sons to castrate themselves into women ain’t a country thinking long term on any issue.
and, yet, Peter Zeihan (new book out) thinks that re-shoring will happen this decade
The collapse of the globalist system wasn’t supposed to happen. Russia was supposed to be Balkanized after 1991 and China was to become the absent minded sweatshop of the western world. Kissinger and his ilk were terrified of China and Russia getting together in the Cold War and that danger was supposedly destroyed forever in 1991. But a multipolar world is emerging.
The 1992 election was likely one of the bloodiest in terms of closed door, under-the-table shoe kicking. US elites of all stripes (financial, industrial) saw the world as their oyster with the fall of the Soviet Union and the continued neo-liberalization of China. In many ways the Cold War was a major deterrent against offshoring and international supply chains, that political hot points between the superpowers could make truly global business plans unstable. But those fears (and trade barriers) were put to rest in 1991.
One of my own pet “subterranean” theories is that globalism (AKA China) allowed US industry to escape the horrible realities of civil rights legislation, litigation, and political correctness pressure. In China, there aren’t any blacks and women knew their place. Sure, it was cheaper to make stuff there and a good place to dump US inflation, but by the 1970s and 1980s you already had proto-woke political forces underway within HR departments and million dollar lawsuits throughout the US. Also, if your dependent on labor in your industry education and good demographics is key. China has a functional education system that isn’t antithetical to merit. The horrible body contortions placed on US education by civil rights legislation and poor IQ demographics (think Detroit and Chicago) was a heavy incentive to leave the US and set up factory shops in China. With the continued collapse of US-led globalization, not many US industrial firms are going to be happy moving back home.
I can’t think of a better example of alpha vs. beta.
They say the same thing regarding limits on abortion. Biden “himself” publicly stated in a press release that “abortion control” hurts poor people of color the most.
It’s the hardest ask for many members of the sane community, but it’s time to turn your back on the NFL, and most pro sports.
Long past time.
It’s the hardest ask for many members of the sane community, but it’s time to turn your back on the NFL, and most pro sports.
That's throwing the baby out with the bathwater. And it lets the terrorists win by making a great American sport unwatchable for Americans.This appears to be a decision and statement by the D.C. Swamp Creatures Team (formal name pending), and Ron Rivera. That's who should be loudly criticized, mocked and boycotted. If they are forced to pay a price in merch, tickets, and viewership it will register and set an example.Why should fans boycott Tom Brady or Bill Belichek (who are based) because they don't like fucktards like Rivera or Colin Kapernick?Replies: @JimDandy
It’s the hardest ask for many members of the sane community, but it’s time to turn your back on the NFL
Better yet I can provide a short but informative video.
With the continued increase in diesel prices blacks might be sent back to the cotton fields.
Probably saw the effectiveness of emotional appeal in today's internet climate.
But at some point the gun control lobby took a dramatic shift in political marketing.
With the Ukraine thing plenty of people recognized that “globohomo” media went after women across the world hard. For the first three months of the special operation the MSM hit the “what about the women and children?” angle repeatedly every night.
https://thesaker.is/japans-perceptions-of-the-propaganda-regarding-the-smo/
Supposedly Bill Kristol wrote this children’s song “Close the Sky” in support of a “no-fly zone” for western Ukraine.
Those student “protests” can all be safely ignored. The Countenance Blogmeister has an axiom, whereby any time large numbers of young people do something, a much older person stands behind it.
Birkley told the informant that ‘everyone else in the basement had to be shot so that there would not be any witnesses,’ according to court records.
Initially, the gun control lobby gained financial and political support due to the public revulsion against gang violence. (Violence performed overwhelming by blacks to blacks.) Both Reagan and George H.W. Bush thought gun control could help turn some inner cities Republican due to the hapless nature of “pro-crime” and “pro-criminal” liberalism. (Before Bill Clinton and Joe Biden would transform the Democratic Party’s platform on the issue in the 1990s.)
But at some point the gun control lobby took a dramatic shift in political marketing. Instead of black crime (the leading cause in gun fatalities) the narrative focused on extremely rare cases of mentally ill (white) students shooting up schools. Did PR marketing firms find this a far more effective strategy in advocating gun control to the public?
Probably saw the effectiveness of emotional appeal in today's internet climate.
But at some point the gun control lobby took a dramatic shift in political marketing.
The cosmopolitans made it a point that there was NOT a war against your long gun, but ONLY your awful handgun. That's why the gun controllers made it a point to almost ALWAYS include word HANDGUN in their organizations: Committee For Handgun Control, National Coalition to Ban Handguns, Handgun Control, Inc., etc.
But at some point the gun control lobby took a dramatic shift in political marketing. Instead of black crime (the leading cause in gun fatalities) the narrative focused on extremely rare cases of mentally ill (white) students shooting up schools. Did PR marketing firms find this a far more effective strategy in advocating gun control to the public?
If the blackface incident didn’t do him in than nothing would.
Unfortunately, this demographic is generally the poorest with little or no kind of life insurance to help cover funeral expenses. Unless your collecting gold teeth grills like it’s a Auschwitz fire sale profit margins must suck.
I’ve written this before here but it bears repeating: dueling. Thug culture in the US is an honor culture, not a legalistic culture. Legalize dueling and you’d save a lot of heartache and suffering.
Conversely, when the ACLU became an anti-Trump organization, membership doubled.
Plenty of progressive/liberal organizations experienced the “Trump Bump” with increased membership roles and donations. As pointed out by Curtis Yarvin, once Biden seized the Presidency in 2020 that flow of money severely contracted. MSM employees were getting fired in droves thus shrinking the operational capacity of The Cathedral.
Do you recall what those objections were based on?
I don't know anything about Amber Heard, but even I know it was a bad idea to defend her. I have no theoretical objection to the idea of defamation liability for false claims of domestic violence. Indeed, one could argue that it is almost a logical necessity once violence against women is established as an outrageous violation of social norms. Universal condemnation of an act means there will be consequences for any high-profile man perceived to have perpetrated it, and there must be a remedy for any damages suffered as a result. Contra Heard's claim that the outcome in her case proves that noone care about DV, I would argue that it suggests the contrary: that DV is taken very seriously, to the point that suspected perpetrators suffer tangible harm as a result.
Many argued that defending Heard was a bad idea but I doubt even they understood how bad the optics would ultimately pan out.
I have no idea what you're talking about here, but I'll just say that I don't really think this case has much in the way of broader significance. Most people are not going to suffer damages from public accusations of domestic violence in the way that a high-profile actor would. This was only news because Johnny Depp is Johnny Depp.Replies: @Kronos
Any husband suffering in silence out of fear of a mentally ill wife now has some glimmer of hope that their stories may be believed and not be mocked.
One of the psychologists that were trying to help the couple while they were married diagnosed Heard with “dissociative identity disorder” which isn’t a fun condition to have and is even less fun to be married to someone who does. She had frequent outbursts of rage which would occasionally injure Depp. While Mr. Depp could provide ample evidence of physical domestic abuse he received from Heard, she really couldn’t provide physical evidence of domestic abuse she received from him. A key component to Heard’s accusation of domestic abuse stemmed from a supposed broken nose she received from Depp. She had photoshoots two days after the the nose was supposedly broken but claimed she hid it through makeup. Lawyers on the Rekieta Law channel heavily grilled that supposed incident as almost physically impossible. I myself had my deviated septum fixed a few years back and they had to break my nose to straighten it. I can’t imagine hiding a broken nose successfully after just two days.
https://pagesix.com/2020/07/07/photos-of-johnny-depps-severed-finger-pop-up-in-court/
For the last few weeks the PBS News Hour would show a different five second clip of Amber Heard crying on the stand whenever the case was briefly mentioned. I sense they didn’t want to get too deep in the case because certain elements presented in the case didn’t present Heard in a favorable light. While the media didn’t go after Depp to the same degree as say Kyle Rittenhouse the majority of MSM outlets were generally pro-Heard by default. The “she’s a bitch, but she’s our bitch” approach of siding with Heard has proved disastrous to the #MeToo movement. Many argued that defending Heard was a bad idea but I doubt even they understood how bad the optics would ultimately pan out. Any husband suffering in silence out of fear of a mentally ill wife now has some glimmer of hope that their stories may be believed and not be mocked.
I don't know anything about Amber Heard, but even I know it was a bad idea to defend her. I have no theoretical objection to the idea of defamation liability for false claims of domestic violence. Indeed, one could argue that it is almost a logical necessity once violence against women is established as an outrageous violation of social norms. Universal condemnation of an act means there will be consequences for any high-profile man perceived to have perpetrated it, and there must be a remedy for any damages suffered as a result. Contra Heard's claim that the outcome in her case proves that noone care about DV, I would argue that it suggests the contrary: that DV is taken very seriously, to the point that suspected perpetrators suffer tangible harm as a result.
Many argued that defending Heard was a bad idea but I doubt even they understood how bad the optics would ultimately pan out.
I have no idea what you're talking about here, but I'll just say that I don't really think this case has much in the way of broader significance. Most people are not going to suffer damages from public accusations of domestic violence in the way that a high-profile actor would. This was only news because Johnny Depp is Johnny Depp.Replies: @Kronos
Any husband suffering in silence out of fear of a mentally ill wife now has some glimmer of hope that their stories may be believed and not be mocked.
Did the ACLU get stiffed by Soros or something? I would’ve thought that during the “Trump era” they were receiving donations up the wazoo.
If this trial has done anything useful, it’s to help people better appreciate how truly batcrap crazy most actresses are.
Partially. But this more had to do with the 2016 Presidential recounts.
That was an absolutely amazing admission.
Far more astounding than the initial faux pas.
A Freudian slip? Or did he just officially concede that the 2003 invasion of Iraq was a mistake?
In fairness to Bush, he was probably confused by the fact that the missing WMDs finally turned up in Ukraine (although they happened to be in our own bioweapons labs).
A Freudian slip? Or did he just officially concede that the 2003 invasion of Iraq was a mistake?
There’s also a strong quality component to the supply. You hear a lot from the gun community that most gun crimes aren’t committed with fancy $1200 Berettas but cheap Hi-Points which are VERY cheap. Hi-Points are cheap because the quality and reliability sucks. But they are within easy financial reach of high crime risk demographics.
Probably the availability of illegal guns to young black males from ages 15 — 35 determines gun crime more than overall gun ownership.
I have to say I absolutely love the iSteve/Unz community! Every single commentator is a gem to be cherished. You really can’t find this sharp humor and wit anywhere else! 🤣🤣🤣
Whether you or I trust the data isn’t the point. Rosie demanded it, so I supplied it.
You know, Reg, it’s one thing to try to pass off anecdotes and conjecture as real evidence, it’s quite another to tell outright lies. I didn’t demand any such data from you.
Indeed, I have never disputed that women are more likely than men to vote for Democrats, whereas you lot just keep voting for the GOP, over and over again, with no reasonable hope of them actually doing anything for you. Maybe if you had played a little hard to get, like White women, the Republicans might have felt obligated to, you know, do something for White people.
(Sigh) Fine, let me break it down.
Not even slightly does the guy have all the responsibility during pregnancy and after a baby is born. She has most of it! You must be from another planet.
The pregnant woman has full authority over the life and death of the child. She doesn’t need written permission from the biological father to continue or terminate the pregnancy. Isn’t that the basis of Roe v. Wade? “My body, my choice” equates to her choice, not anyone else’s. That power is an example of ultimate authority. (Buck v. Bell might still be on the books, but when was the last time the state ordered someone sterilized?)
And after a baby is born and proved to be his, he most certainly does have legal rights equating to some authority.
But will that authority be continuously overruled by the woman? Unless the woman has tried to sell the child for drugs or some other ghastly endeavor most family courts strongly favor the woman. That isn’t contested fact.
https://nypost.com/2019/04/08/mom-who-sold-kids-to-settle-drug-debt-gets-6-years-behind-bars/
You know where he could exercise the most mature responsibility? In wearing a condom or pulling out before the big finish. How completely brain dead are men that they cannot accomplish something so simple? That is the biggest issue in unintended pregnancy….irresponsible ejaculation.
Oh dear Real World how I love it when people prove my point. Our beloved Rosie made a similar argument. Both carried the same moral principle that as if women simply didn’t wear mini skirts they wouldn’t get raped. It takes two to tango (unless it is rape) and both parties should share equal responsibility and blame from the potential fallout of sexual intercourse. But our current system of laws and culture provide the equivalent of tactical nukes to sociopathic gold-diggers like Brittany Renner and Amber Heard.
Rumors abounded that PJ Washington (Renner’s ex-boyfriend) had to pay a whopping $200,000 in child support. While an extreme example, it does demonstrate the real favoritism of women over men in society.
Lol. Imagine being such an asshole that a court orders you to pay $200,000 in child support!
Rumors abounded that PJ Washington (Renner’s ex-boyfriend) had to pay a whopping $200,000 in child support. While an extreme example, it does demonstrate the real favoritism of women over men in society.
Is she a raging pro-abortionist?
If she shares any ideological underpinnings with her husband why would she leak to Politico?
Haven't you already made a fool of yourself by shooting your mouth off about things you know nothing about? A noncustodial father's right to visitation is nearly absolute. A woman cannot deprive a father of it unless he is not only unfit but dangerous.
But mothers could in practice (and do) easily deprive the child from the father which too is cruel. The law is in her orbit.
Or it may lead to you having fewer rights than you already have. Indeed, for all your bitching, I have never heard one single constructive demand ever from you manosphere people, all I ever hear are vague allegations about "muh biased courts." The fact that men have worse outcomes in family court does not prove disparate treatment. Women have worse outcomes in certain careers. That isn't proof of disparate treatment, either.
The destruction of Roe v. Wade may lead to a truly more equitable legal balance between mother and father. If abortion law restarts on the state level there’s room for political maneuvering and compromise.
Your male sense of entitlement is showing again. You think women should spend every last dime they have on the kids so you can pay less child support and buy a bigger house with your new wife or a new three-wheeler or whatever. Well tough shit it doesn't work that way.
Unfortunately, there’s been plenty of examples of women misusing child support for non child rearing purposes. Especially seen in a certain racial demographic.
How do you know she lied? Were you there?
It happened to a male Mormon high school friend. Girl claimed to be on birth control but she lied. They’re married now and live in his parents basement with two kids. I’m not sure if they’re happily married. He has a future, but I’d wager it would have been brighter had that unfortunate incident not occurred.
Haven’t you already made a fool of yourself by shooting your mouth off about things you know nothing about?
Nonsense! The beauty of the iSteve community is the chance to learn new things and clash ideas in an oratory arena. I remember taking various political science courses from a wonderful professor in college. He was a practicing lawyer with good legal experience in the corporate world. The class would study various legal cases determined by the US Supreme Court. But he never touched on Roe v. Wade. I distinctly remember it being brought up in some discussion once. He offered to discuss Roe v. Wade only during his office hours in his office. (I dearly wish I took him up on that offer.) Now, think about that. This single legal case concerned a tenured professor so much that he’d only discuss it in private. (Plausible deniability, hearsay all that jazz.) No other legal case has that kind of political power in our contemporary era. I don’t think even the pro-slavery decisions or even Plessy v. Ferguson had that kind of cultural/societal/political “oomph” in their respective eras. You can’t have a clear and open discussion of Roe v. Wade without the chance of someone going bonkers. No small wonder this court draft that overturns Roe v. Wade is the first “leak” in the US Supreme Court’s history. So yes, thanks Rosie for enlightening me for free and not asking 40K in tuition.
The fact that men have worse outcomes in family court does not prove disparate treatment.
I thought that was the beauty of desperate impact. It doesn’t matter if the test is intentionally racist or not. If blacks score lower on it compared to whites it is therefore a racist test. I guess divorce court is sexist.
How do you know she lied? Were you there?
She later told him she lied (years later.) She liked him that much. Then he told me and I tried not to laugh.
Of course, even if she did, he could have avoided this by following his Church’s teachings and not having sex with a woman he didn’t want to marry and have kids with.
Isn’t that the mirror image of the “that loose skank with the short skirt was asking for trouble” statement that got feminists so riled up?
So do you support disparate impact theory or not?
I thought that was the beauty of desperate impact. It doesn’t matter if the test is intentionally racist or not. If blacks score lower on it compared to whites it is therefore a racist test. I guess divorce court is sexist.
I suppose it stands to reason that men who get into manosphere stuff have unusually bad experiences or observations of women, so I'll go ahead and give you the benefit of the doubt concerning this just-so story. All I can say is that I don't think it's typical.
She later told him she lied (years later.) She liked him that much. Then he told me and I tried not to laugh.
No, not remotely. We assume that a man is capable of looking at a short skirt and not forcing himself on her. Therefore, being raped is not a foreseeable consequence of wearing a short skirt. Would you rather we made the contrary assumption? If we did, I have little doubt manospherians would whine about that, too. After all, what kind of crazed man-hater goes around d implying that men have no self-control?
Isn’t that the mirror image of the “that loose skank with the short skirt was asking for trouble” statement that got feminists so riled up?
extremely good recent youtube video on the putative leaded gasoline hypothesis of violent crime.
i don’t agree much with the projections of 800 million IQ points lost and tetraethyl lead causing the 1960s crime escalation (no lead in gasoline today and US violent crime absolute numbers are almost equal to the 1991 peak right now in 2022, 2021 murder numbers were the highest since 1995)
but this video covers some fascinating background on Clair Patterson and Thomas Midgley.
Taking a child away from its mother is not seen as cruel. It is cruel. How is overturning Roe going to change that?
Roe v. Wade left a legal groove within the wood of family law that made it easy for women to maintain control over the child even after birth. Even after the child is born, the kid needs to be nursed and taking the child away is seen as cruel.
I find that really hard to believe. My understanding is that child support is allocated so as to minimize disruption for the child. Nonetheless, even if you're right, overturning Roe isn't going to help with that, either. It just means that more men will be paying child support than otherwise would.
That then goes into the issue of child support and how US women are allowed to largely spend that money however they wish.
Is that a thing? If you tell a guy you're on the pill, but then forgot to take one, is that "lying" or just an accident? Either way, overturning Roe won't help that, either.
Even if she lied about being on birth control.
Taking a child away from its mother is not seen as cruel. It is cruel.
It is, but in some cases it may be necessary for the protection of the child. But mothers could in practice (and do) easily deprive the child from the father which too is cruel. The law is in her orbit. The destruction of Roe v. Wade may lead to a truly more equitable legal balance between mother and father. If abortion law restarts on the state level there’s room for political maneuvering and compromise.
I find that really hard to believe. My understanding is that child support is allocated so as to minimize disruption for the child.
Unfortunately, there’s been plenty of examples of women misusing child support for non child rearing purposes. Especially seen in a certain racial demographic.
Is that a thing? If you tell a guy you’re on the pill, but then forgot to take one, is that “lying” or just an accident? Either way, overturning Roe won’t help that, either.
It happened to a male Mormon high school friend. Girl claimed to be on birth control but she lied. They’re married now and live in his parents basement with two kids. I’m not sure if they’re happily married. He has a future, but I’d wager it would have been brighter had that unfortunate incident not occurred. My own Episcopal church is on the other hand very pro-contraceptives and pro-abortion. Though not entirely for the reasons of women’s rights if you catch my drif “Tyrone! Leave this neighborhood at once! This ain’t your zipcode shoo shoo!”
Haven't you already made a fool of yourself by shooting your mouth off about things you know nothing about? A noncustodial father's right to visitation is nearly absolute. A woman cannot deprive a father of it unless he is not only unfit but dangerous.
But mothers could in practice (and do) easily deprive the child from the father which too is cruel. The law is in her orbit.
Or it may lead to you having fewer rights than you already have. Indeed, for all your bitching, I have never heard one single constructive demand ever from you manosphere people, all I ever hear are vague allegations about "muh biased courts." The fact that men have worse outcomes in family court does not prove disparate treatment. Women have worse outcomes in certain careers. That isn't proof of disparate treatment, either.
The destruction of Roe v. Wade may lead to a truly more equitable legal balance between mother and father. If abortion law restarts on the state level there’s room for political maneuvering and compromise.
Your male sense of entitlement is showing again. You think women should spend every last dime they have on the kids so you can pay less child support and buy a bigger house with your new wife or a new three-wheeler or whatever. Well tough shit it doesn't work that way.
Unfortunately, there’s been plenty of examples of women misusing child support for non child rearing purposes. Especially seen in a certain racial demographic.
How do you know she lied? Were you there?
It happened to a male Mormon high school friend. Girl claimed to be on birth control but she lied. They’re married now and live in his parents basement with two kids. I’m not sure if they’re happily married. He has a future, but I’d wager it would have been brighter had that unfortunate incident not occurred.
That quote does not have application in the circumstance you tried to contort it to fit.
As Rollo Tomassi has repeatedly stated “all responsibility, and zero authority.”
You know where he could exercise the most mature responsibility? In wearing a condom or pulling out before the big finish.
First off, pull out game is highly risky. A single drop of plasma has millions of sperm cells so never rely on that as the main defense against pregnancy.
Second, nearly all the big athletics organizations provide mandated special classes for male players regarding sex.
https://nypost.com/2016/10/12/sources-back-derrick-rose-nba-teaches-condom-disposal/
Yeah, flushing down a condom is bad for plumbing, especially cast iron plumbing. But might be worth the risk compared to the potential of 18 years of child support. If you had a girl sign a contract both consenting to sex and that she WAS on birth control (real romantic right?) would that even work under Roe v. Wade?
Those classes are needed because people like Brittany Renner hang around the dark clubs of big cities. Just watch this video at the 1:20 mark for three minutes.
Esther Griswold and William J Brennan would disagree (Whizzer White and Potter Stewart "evolved" in opposite directions):
The Pill isn’t constitutionally protected, but abortion is.
How often do you see so frank an admission in a headline? Would you call this a sack dance?
Griswold v Connecticut
Majority
Douglas, joined by Warren, Clark, Brennan, Goldberg
Concurrence
Goldberg, joined by Warren, Brennan
Concurrence
Harlan
Concurrence
White
Dissent
Black, joined by Stewart
Dissent
Stewart, joined by Black
Roe v Wade
Majority
Blackmun, joined by Burger, Douglas, Brennan, Stewart, Marshall, Powell
Concurrence
Burger
Concurrence
Douglas
Concurrence
Stewart
Dissent
White, joined by Rehnquist
Dissent
Rehnquist
Yeah, I didn’t know that hormonal birth control was also protected. I guess when I always read that birth control was protected under the constitution I thought they just didn’t want to write “abortion.”
How so?Replies: @Kronos
Roe v. Wade had real teeth and made itself felt in US divorce court. It paved the way for the sheer lopsided favoritism divorce court shows to women over men.
Roe v. Wade left a legal groove within the wood of family law that made it easy for women to maintain control over the child even after birth. Even after the child is born, the kid needs to be nursed and taking the child away is seen as cruel. So unless that women is a drug addict, a felon, and HIV positive family court judges are especially loathed to deprive a woman of her child. That then goes into the issue of child support and how US women are allowed to largely spend that money however they wish. The child is used as a useful human shield in all legal battles between the man and women. Once the sperm leaves your body, men have little to no say over the issue of reproduction. Even if she lied about being on birth control.
Taking a child away from its mother is not seen as cruel. It is cruel. How is overturning Roe going to change that?
Roe v. Wade left a legal groove within the wood of family law that made it easy for women to maintain control over the child even after birth. Even after the child is born, the kid needs to be nursed and taking the child away is seen as cruel.
I find that really hard to believe. My understanding is that child support is allocated so as to minimize disruption for the child. Nonetheless, even if you're right, overturning Roe isn't going to help with that, either. It just means that more men will be paying child support than otherwise would.
That then goes into the issue of child support and how US women are allowed to largely spend that money however they wish.
Is that a thing? If you tell a guy you're on the pill, but then forgot to take one, is that "lying" or just an accident? Either way, overturning Roe won't help that, either.
Even if she lied about being on birth control.
I’m not sure what you mean. Since the 1970s divorce and child custody battles have largely favored women over men. Do you mean if it flips 180 degrees in five years and once again favors men?
For all that's good and holy, please can you people stop shooting your mouths off about things you don't know Jack shit about?
The Pill isn’t constitutionally protected, but abortion is.
At least, by the grace of God, we won't have to listen to this crap anymore.Replies: @Kronos
A women had the power of life and death and the father had absolutely no say. But, would have to bear the price of child support if the woman deemed it acceptable to keep the pregnancy.
I had no idea that both were protected.
Substantive due process protects a lot of things (or at least it did), to wit:
I had no idea that both were protected.
I was most likely recalling that disastrous comment by RBG. Thanks for coming to the rescue John Johnson!
The serious players both Republican and Democrat well understood that Roe v. Wade could blowup at any time. Any slight bruising to Roe v. Wade could (and did) lead to more serious infections that limited its scope. Supreme court justices who were typically smart would tie themselves into the dumbest of knots trying to justify it. I think Sandra Day O'Connor once spoke an absolutely pathetic gaffe that either had to do with abortion or affirmative action. It was something like the Supreme Court has the right to cave from political pressure, a real doozy. (I can't find it but if someone could that'll be super cool!) https://thumbs.gfycat.com/AltruisticDependableGordonsetter-small.gif
Roe v. Wade was the best thing that ever happened to Republicans.
The Pill isn't constitutionally protected, but abortion is. Roe v. Wade had real teeth and made itself felt in US divorce court. It paved the way for the sheer lopsided favoritism divorce court shows to women over men. A women had the power of life and death and the father had absolutely no say. But, would have to bear the price of child support if the woman deemed it acceptable to keep the pregnancy. As Rollo Tomassi has repeatedly stated "all responsibility, and zero authority." That ain't political peanuts.Replies: @Anon, @John Johnson, @Anon, @Rosie, @Reg Cæsar, @The Real World
Post hoc ergo propter hoc – After this, therefore because of this – a fallacy. The Pill had a lot more to do with this than abortion.
I think Sandra Day O’Connor once spoke an absolutely pathetic gaffe that either had to do with abortion or affirmative action. It was something like the Supreme Court has the right to cave from political pressure, a real doozy. (I can’t find it but if someone could that’ll be super cool!)
RBG made such a gaffe.
She said they had to serve the politicians at the time because there were so many unwanted pregnancies (from the 60s welfare programs).
So in a single sentence she admitted it wasn’t about the constitution.
WHOOPS
No abortion? Know negroes!
There’s been a sweeping number of pro-second amendment victories. I didn’t know George Soros was a big fan of firearms. I guess he really wants to fan the flames in the inner cities.
Now if only they could get rid of the McClure-Volkmer ban on new machine guns!
Roe v. Wade was the best thing that ever happened to Republicans. They could posture "pro-life" all they wanted to please their base and raise funds without ever having to deal with the real world consequences of banning abortion (more people of color).
If you were pro-abortion, Roe v. Wade was a continuous quagmire that bled backers dry politically as well as financially.
Post hoc ergo propter hoc - After this, therefore because of this - a fallacy. The Pill had a lot more to do with this than abortion.Replies: @Kronos
But overall American women became entitled skanks soon after its passing.
Roe v. Wade was the best thing that ever happened to Republicans.
The serious players both Republican and Democrat well understood that Roe v. Wade could blowup at any time. Any slight bruising to Roe v. Wade could (and did) lead to more serious infections that limited its scope. Supreme court justices who were typically smart would tie themselves into the dumbest of knots trying to justify it. I think Sandra Day O’Connor once spoke an absolutely pathetic gaffe that either had to do with abortion or affirmative action. It was something like the Supreme Court has the right to cave from political pressure, a real doozy. (I can’t find it but if someone could that’ll be super cool!)
Post hoc ergo propter hoc – After this, therefore because of this – a fallacy. The Pill had a lot more to do with this than abortion.
The Pill isn’t constitutionally protected, but abortion is. Roe v. Wade had real teeth and made itself felt in US divorce court. It paved the way for the sheer lopsided favoritism divorce court shows to women over men. A women had the power of life and death and the father had absolutely no say. But, would have to bear the price of child support if the woman deemed it acceptable to keep the pregnancy. As Rollo Tomassi has repeatedly stated “all responsibility, and zero authority.” That ain’t political peanuts.
How so?Replies: @Kronos
Roe v. Wade had real teeth and made itself felt in US divorce court. It paved the way for the sheer lopsided favoritism divorce court shows to women over men.
For all that's good and holy, please can you people stop shooting your mouths off about things you don't know Jack shit about?
The Pill isn’t constitutionally protected, but abortion is.
At least, by the grace of God, we won't have to listen to this crap anymore.Replies: @Kronos
A women had the power of life and death and the father had absolutely no say. But, would have to bear the price of child support if the woman deemed it acceptable to keep the pregnancy.
Esther Griswold and William J Brennan would disagree (Whizzer White and Potter Stewart "evolved" in opposite directions):
The Pill isn’t constitutionally protected, but abortion is.
How often do you see so frank an admission in a headline? Would you call this a sack dance?
Griswold v Connecticut
Majority
Douglas, joined by Warren, Clark, Brennan, Goldberg
Concurrence
Goldberg, joined by Warren, Brennan
Concurrence
Harlan
Concurrence
White
Dissent
Black, joined by Stewart
Dissent
Stewart, joined by Black
Roe v Wade
Majority
Blackmun, joined by Burger, Douglas, Brennan, Stewart, Marshall, Powell
Concurrence
Burger
Concurrence
Douglas
Concurrence
Stewart
Dissent
White, joined by Rehnquist
Dissent
Rehnquist
That quote does not have application in the circumstance you tried to contort it to fit.
As Rollo Tomassi has repeatedly stated “all responsibility, and zero authority.”
I get it. But the pro-life people have been at this for almost fifty years. Roe v. Wade is one of the most retarded legal decisions ever made by the US Supreme Court. So I’m happy to let Charlie Brown finally kick the stupid football. In terms of legal foundation it’s as stable as a quadriplegic with vertigo. Sure, it kept the black population in check so something good did come of it. But overall American women became entitled skanks soon after its passing. Roe v. Wade killed plenty of whites as well as blacks and it’s time the white birth rate finally goes up however slightly. I can’t see how much will change with pro-abortion states. If you were pro-abortion, Roe v. Wade was a continuous quagmire that bled backers dry politically as well as financially. A Pyrrhic victory if ever there was one.
Roe v. Wade was the best thing that ever happened to Republicans. They could posture "pro-life" all they wanted to please their base and raise funds without ever having to deal with the real world consequences of banning abortion (more people of color).
If you were pro-abortion, Roe v. Wade was a continuous quagmire that bled backers dry politically as well as financially.
Post hoc ergo propter hoc - After this, therefore because of this - a fallacy. The Pill had a lot more to do with this than abortion.Replies: @Kronos
But overall American women became entitled skanks soon after its passing.
The right wing kids are meeting in the treehouse, missing one member, discussing their recent defeats and concerns, and feeling the synergistic energy of the widely-involved planning of plans likely to work. The meeting started dark but ends like early dawn. Then there is a sound from outside. Did the reds regroup? Is it weather? Then the roof collapses! The kids are not especially hurt, but gasping and gawking through curling sawdust they see, on top of the destroyed roof, that member who had been absent. The special one. And he crows, “Hurr durr, all life is say cred!”
It’ll never happen. The person in question is a brave soul speaking power to truth. He or she will get positive publicity and book deals galore.
Dysgenic. The smart cull themselves. The dumb just pop ‘em out like rabbits
That had always been the problem with Roe v. Wade. The original backers didn’t think it could ever happen but it did.
Buscemi was superb in Boardwalk Empire.
That show was kind of uneven. But unlike a lot of shows I think it got stronger as it progressed (also it became more about the Buscemi character). The best parts of Boardwalk Empire are as good as anything out there IMHO.
Buscemi was superb in Boardwalk Empire.
I can’t imagine this movie being made after the 2013 Great Awokening. Sure, hillybillies and rednecks have been used as chaotic evil villains for decades but “Tucker & Dale vs Evil” provided a level of self aware parody of it that most studios couldn’t demonstrate in contemporary film. They flipped that formula and turned it into a great horror comedy.
Nothing tells life like Tucker and Dale vs Evil
But those older models worked great don’t you think? My dad’s old one was an absolute beast. It was all metal and no plastic. I never thought of disposing my siblings with it though.
Has iSteve considered that iDog (who doesn’t yet have a public name) may have been a witness to something involving a wood chipper?
A rescue dog has a prior life experience iSteve doesn’t know about?
It’s good your dog is scared of things she should be. It may be that loud noise that’s an obviously un-natural and un-knowable sound that she hates more than a vision from Fargo*.
When our cat ambles across the road, even with no cars around, I still clap and yell at him, or get him and throw him toward the side. These animals just can’t get how fast machines move. Then there’s the electric leaf blower – he’s gotten wise to that one … it used to be a blast!
.
* A friend and I thought that movie was hilarious, mainly due to the heavy Midwest accents. I saw it a 2nd time and didn’t think it was near as funny. (No, we were NOT high the first time. Quit assuming!)
Ah yes, the good ‘ol wood chipper. A favorite tool in numerous black comedies.
Always watching and noticing.
Lira wasn’t going after the audience of the NYT or CNN. That’s largely a lost cause. It’s difficult to peel off readers/listeners from those MSM outlets much less obtain subscriptions/donations from them.
He was providing info to the alternative news arena. Most Daily Beast readers had no idea who he was or what his messaging consisted of. But because the MSM has increasingly become an active propaganda outlet and suppressor of free speech they just couldn’t help themselves and scrag another fellow journalist.
Lira was not a "journalist" in any meaningful sense - if the MSM are themselves propaganda outlets then he was a propagandist on a whole 'nother level. I realize that to some people here the "alternative news arena" represents just another POV that is different from the MSM (maybe in their topsy turvy world, the MSM is the propaganda and Lira is the pravda) , but there has to be a line where "alternative news" ends and outright falsehoods begin. Apparently Lira is alive and well although possibly under some form of house arrest in Kharkiv. In any case the cruel Ukrainian "Nazis" have not executed him and left his body in the street like the Russian "anti-fascists" do.https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2022/04/journalist-gonzalo-lira-is-missing-and-presumed-dead-but-his-bucha-video-is-not.htmlSpeaking of being alive and (not so) well, Putin and Shoigu made a live appearance on TV the other day and neither of them looked very healthy. Putin looked like he was holding on to the table in order to remain upright and Shoigu read/mumbled from a script. The whole sight was rather pathetic. Russians are not really a smiley bunch but if this was the "victory" announcement for Mariupol the optics were not very victorious. I would give them the benefit of the doubt and assume that they were both just drunk as Russians are wont to do but Putin is known not to be a drinker.https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10742521/Putin-seen-gripping-table-amid-cancer-battle-rumours-meets-slurring-defence-minister.htmlhttps://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2022/04/22/13/56918087-10742521-A_bloated_Vladimir_Putin_has_been_seen_gripping_a_table_whilst_s-a-34_1650632365603.jpgWe really need to get rid of the geriatric clowns who send young men to die everywhere (including the US). There is a thing in cults (like Mormon polygamists) where the older male leaders push the young men out because they don't want them competing for the females - this must be deeply rooted in primate behavior. There should be some fairly low age limit on leadership. Old, wise heads could be advisors but the man in charge should be young enough to attract women on his own without having to kill off the youth.Replies: @Art Deco
another fellow journalist
Fair point.
The Daily Beast essentially lighted up a giant media flare over Gonzalo Lira alerting the Ukrainians that this guy is serious trouble. (Look at the number of views from this recent interview.)
That hit piece (no pun intended😨) marked Lira as a enemy VIP in the ongoing propaganda war in Ukraine. That’s a fairly long article meant both to discredit Lira while simultaneously spiking Lira to near the top of Zelenskyy‘s shit list. They don’t spill that much ink for anyone. If the Ukrainian secret police were looking for him before, they soon brought out the real bloodhounds after that article was published.
On a bigger note the Daily Beast just doxxed the location of Gonzalo Lira in Ukraine.
Congratulations and best of luck!
Can blacks be terrorists in our woke era? Not according to the NYPD.
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/reports-shooting-explosion-brooklyn-subway-station
Agreed. The Neocons should NOT have started this war, or any of the other wars they started.
1. Prevent Ukraine from joining Nato.
2. Destroy Ukrainian military.
3. Protect Russians within Ukraine.
Which of these 3 goals the Russians set out are they not accomplishing? Has any Russian official said there were any other goals? Has any Russian official been quoted saying they didn’t expect stiff Ukrainian resistance? Were either Sweden or Finland allies of Russia before this war? And if the Russians decide to invade Finland, a country with a population smaller than NYC, to prevent them from joining Nato, is there any real doubt to the outcome?
Exactly, I agree with Mearsheimer 100% on all of this.
1. Prevent Ukraine from joining Nato.
2. Destroy Ukrainian military.
3. Protect Russians within Ukraine.
Which of these 3 goals the Russians set out are they not accomplishing?
https://twitter.com/i/events/1513612319992995853All this is perfectly in line with earlier London Times FSB whistleblower excerpts:
[According to the London Times] Putin ‘purges’ 150 FSB agents in response to Russia’s botched war with UkraineA “Stalinist” mass purge of Russian secret intelligence is under way after more than 100 agents were removed from their jobs and the head of the department responsible for Ukraine was sent to prison...All of those ousted were employees of the Fifth Service, a division set up...to carry out operations in the countries of the former Soviet Union with the aim of keeping them within Russia’s orbit
Replies: @Clyde, @Wokechoke, @Antiwar7
The Pandora’s Box is open – a real global horror will begin by the summer…I can’t say what guided those in charge to decide to proceed with the execution of this operation (Ukraine invasion), but now they are methodically blaming us (FSB).
I'd give them an F on #1, an Incomplete on #2, and and a D on #3. No doubt the Russian invaders have killed some local Russians to go along with several thousand Ukrainians.
Which of these 3 goals the Russians set out are they not accomplishing?
Poor countries that have deep economic ties to Germany and other Western European countries can get rich as low-cost suppliers of manufactured goods to the richer countries of Europe.
The top export of Poland is car parts (followed by cars), and the top destination is Germany. For Romania, it’s also car parts followed by cars, with Germany as the top destination. Hungary and Slovakia shake things up: there it’s cars followed by car parts, again with Germany as the top destination. Ukraine’s top export is seed oil, and its top trade partner is Russia. And the problem with being part of a Russia-centric economic system is that the Russian economy is based on fossil fuel extraction. Germany’s manufacturing economy can send supply-chain tendrils out to its neighbors, who start out manufacturing the lowest-value components and then move up. But there’s no value chain that Russia can export.
https://www.slowboring.com/p/ukraine-and-the-end-of-history?s=r
In February of 2013, under Yanukovych and with his allies enjoying a majority in parliament, Ukraine was poised to ratify an association agreement with the EU. Putin didn’t like that and pressured Yanukovych to make a deal with Russia instead. In November 2013 Yanukovych acquiesced, triggering massive protests and ultimately leading to the Revolution of Dignity, Putin annexing Crimea,2 and Russia sponsoring separatist rebellions in the Donbas region.
Since then, Ukraine has become steadily less cleft.
The pro-Russian faction lost power in 2014 when it became clear that the bar for being pro-Russian was “voluntarily abandon your best chance for economic development” rather than “have a lot of Russian-language shows on TV.” And that’s because the pro-Russian faction was ultimately controlled by Moscow and did not reflect the interests and aspirations of Russophone Ukrainians. That put the anti-Russian faction in the driver’s seat for years, but they didn’t do a great job of governing the country. That led to Zelenskyy’s landslide win in 2019, where he did much better in the eastern parts of the country than the west. Zelenskyy is a native Russian speaker, and part of his platform was to be more open to negotiating with Russia to end the conflict in Donbas.
This did not work (obviously), but its very failure successfully consolidated Ukrainian identity precisely because Zelenskyy’s policy initially was not seen as coming from a place of hardcore Ukrainian nationalism. What Zelensky was trying to give people was the basic ingredients of the end of history: good government, autonomy, and prosperity through integration with the richer parts of the world. In his own mind, Putin is surely waging some kind of battle for Russian civilization. But by shelling the cities of eastern Ukraine, he’s just confirmed to everyone that he doesn’t care about them — or really anyone — and that the way forward is to have an independent country on the road to EU membership.
Why look at quotes from a not terribly open government when we can just look at what the Russian military did in the first days of the invasion? Their obvious strategic assumption was that they could decapitate the Ukraine government in Kiev quite easily. Instead, much to nearly everyone's surprise, they got boot-stomped and had to give up on Kiev altogether.
Has any Russian official been quoted saying they didn’t expect stiff Ukrainian resistance?
No, but they were neutral, and it's very possible they will no longer be neutral in another year. Both countries have small populations, but they are middle-sized countries strategically placed either along or close to Russia's northern flank.Moscow clearly does not want either country in NATO. It has said so on numerous occasions. But the result of this war is that both are now much more likely to end up in the military alliance. How is that not a loss for Putin and Russia?
Were either Sweden or Finland allies of Russia before this war?
Very much so.Replies: @NOTA
And if the Russians decide to invade Finland, a country with a population smaller than NYC, to prevent them from joining Nato, is there any real doubt to the outcome?
Nope.
1. Prevent Ukraine from joining Nato.
Nope.
2. Destroy Ukrainian military.
Nope.
3. Protect Russians within Ukraine.
How'd invading Finland work out for the Russians last time they tried it?
And if the Russians decide to invade Finland, a country with a population smaller than NYC, to prevent them from joining Nato, is there any real doubt to the outcome?
Americans cannot conceive of anything less than total victory or defeat, because their idea of war is shaped by the American Civil War. To Americans, winning a war means that your enemy's parliament is dissolved, their currency cancelled, and their children made to pledge allegiance to your flag every school day.They just don't get the chess that the european elites have been playing with one another for centuries. The purpose of european wars is not to win or lose, it is to cull the commons when they get too numerous.
1. Prevent Ukraine from joining Nato.
2. Destroy Ukrainian military.
3. Protect Russians within Ukraine.Which of these 3 goals the Russians set out are they not accomplishing?
One of the more interesting memes to come out of the Ukraine crisis is that of the “Vatnik.” Some guy back in the late 2000s made a Russian parody of Spongebob Squarepants to reflect a drunk quilted jacket. Supposedly these are the Russian equivalent to US patriotic rednecks but their signature mark are homemade clothing. (Also, excessive alcoholism.) These Vatniks are super patriotic and big fans of Putin. Some of the 4Chan memes are funny but most are graphically profane and ill-suited as iSteve commentary material.
Meanwhile, China and India become increasingly interconnected to Russia.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/11/us/politics/biden-modi-india-russia-oil.html
Maybe they learnt something about Russian defense equipment by watching the war?
Import of defence equipment to be exception; will require DAC, defence minister’s nod
https://theprint.in/india/import-of-defence-equipment-to-be-exception-will-require-dac-defence-ministers-nod/902396/
Ukraine was supposed to be the forward operating base, not the battleground. Rumors allege that Lieutenant General Roger Cloutier (formerly commanding our African interference) was taken alive by Russians once they took the Azovstal factory complex. Now Politifact has “debunked” this. They “debunked” it by talking to two people who are not Lieutenant General Roger Cloutier and by describing a LinkedIn account. Politifact “debunking” allegations is generally the first step toward a quiet official acknowledgement. But it has seemed a safe bet to me that Americans are in Ukraine now both as advisors and as operators.
I never got it.
If you’re vaxxed, I would recommend a handgun, it will be easier to stick between your lips.
It’s the same story. Separate nations.
The Hungarians have–very wisely–voted to continue being Hungary, a civilized nation. To not be immigrated or rainbow fagged into absorption into the globohomo blob and ergo Hungary’s destruction. Good for them.
Continuing to be a separate nation ought not even be a question. We should have learned from the age of empires. Sadly there are plenty of people–Biden, the US establishment and deep state, EU bureaucrats, Putin, some of his cronies, Xi some of his cronies–that don’t like people having their own nations and love bossing folks around.
We need to the choice that Hungary wisely took, here.
What was that McDonalds jingle? “I’m lovin’ it”.
I especially like the fellow snatching something off the ground at 0:15 looking for all the world like a baboon or a chimpanzee stealing a mango. That’s how we roll in the monkey cage.
Go with the Benelli. The Tavor, although well balanced, is going to need a trigger upgrade like most bullpups. It’s a really horrible trigger even by shotgun standards. The recoil was also positively painful even by 12 ga. standards so you’ll want to add a muzzle brake.( I’ve seen some people who say the recoil is much better than other 12 ga. shotguns but that wasn’t my experience at all) So throw in a red dot/optic and you’re out of pocket like 2K. There is also no really good supporting hand position that’s not far too close to the muzzle, (you can’t really use a fingertip grip on the magazine tubes because you get pinched so you have to sort of palm across two tubes), which scares me. I didn’t have any ammo trouble myself but I only put two boxes through it before I knew it wasn’t for me. Others told me they did. YMMV of course.
This could be a good basic choice.
A tactical 12 gauge for the home is now a necessity. Don’t wait until you wish you’d had one.
I’m divided between these two.
LOL
My wife voted in the Hungarian election. She received her ballot in the mail from the Hungarian consulate in New York City, return addressed directly to Hungary.
I read her ballot. She voted for Orban and his Fidesz party, and she voted NO on all of the referenda that I notice David Pinsen copied:
David Pinsen Retweeted
Bennett’s Phylactery
@extradeadjcb
The presence of these referenda on the ballot reminded a few undecided voters what Orban’s enemies stand for
We manipulate a few procedural outcomes
Quote Tweet
Visegrád 24
@visegrad24
· 12h
Apart from the election, Hungary also held a referendum today on whether or not to ban sexually explicit media in sex-ed and sex-reassignment information targeting school children.
Voter turnout was 67% and between 92-96% of people voted no on the referendum questions.
“Do you support children in public schools participating in classes demonstrating sexual orientations without parental consent?”
“Do you support information about gender change treatments being given to children?”
“Do you support media content of a sexual nature and affecting the development of children being presented to them without any restrictions?”
“Do you support media content presenting gender change being presented to children?”
Turnout was 67% and 92-96% of people voted NO on all four referendum questions.
Forgive me if my cutting and pasting is awkward, but my point is that the Hungarian people have there heads screwed on correctly — while my fellow Americans have lost their minds and their streets.
...You married well.
She voted for Orban and his Fidesz party
I agree, Charles Mackay's 1855 book
Forgive me if my cutting and pasting is awkward, but my point is that the Hungarian people have there heads screwed on correctly — while my fellow Americans have lost their minds and their streets.
That's unfortunate. According to Atlantic Council deep thinker/ respected intellectual Anders Åslund, your wife "voted against democracy"*:https://twitter.com/anders_aslund/status/1510730232273195009Please tell her that the Atlantic Council, Bill Kristol, David Frum, et al would very much prefer that she vote "for democracy" next time. Thank you.Even more remarkably, none of the top replies to this tweet seemed to note anything odd, let alone oxymoronic, about the "vote against democracy" conceit. They seemed to take it for granted that "democracy" means getting the "right" results from an election. Also -- this guy Aslund has 235K+ followers? I guess the finer details of p̶l̶o̶t̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶r̶e̶g̶i̶m̶e̶ ̶c̶h̶a̶n̶g̶e̶ promoting human rights democracy and progressive social justice have very broad popular appeal...Side note: you quote Bennett's Phylactery as saying:
My wife voted in the Hungarian election..... She voted for Orban and his Fidesz party
The MoA blogger seems pretty reliable on these sorts of things.
The bodies did not appear as they recaptured the place. They appeared 4 days after they recaptured the place. They appeared 1-2 days after Azov entered the place.
But I do think that the American/NATO/Ukrainian side has massive superiority in the media and propaganda power that can tilt reality, so I tend to be much more cautious in believing anything they say.
Unfortunately, this gives groups like Azov a much freer hand to play nasty. They believe (and rightfully so) that the US MSM will dramatically downplay their unsavory actions and/or depict them as Russian atrocities. Also, I wouldn’t be surprised if Azov had access to the Syrian anti-Assad PR hands that helped stage two false flag attacks in Syria. Those staged events failed but not by lack of trying.
The story that Russia was bombarding a nuclear reactor with tanks is the biggest false flag so far. Some Ukrainian used a flare to start a office fire in a administrative building. But of course the MSM went cray cray until quietly backtracking it when the public outrage wasn’t big enough.
Exactly. That's one reason I'm not paying much attention to all these massacre/atrocity stories. Some people have claimed that most of the victims were actually killed by the Ukrainians and blamed on the Russians, and that wouldn't surprise me a bit.Replies: @For what it's worth
Unfortunately, this gives groups like Azov a much freer hand to play nasty. They believe (and rightfully so) that the US MSM will dramatically downplay their unsavory actions and/or depict them as Russian atrocities. Also, I wouldn’t be surprised if Azov had access to the Syrian anti-Assad PR hands that helped stage two false flag attacks in Syria. Those staged events failed but not by lack of trying.
That is pretty much impossible. This map shows Kyiv as encircled but you could take a train to Kyiv today if you wanted to (and back). So how is it encircled? As I have said before, everyone is entitled to their own opinions on this war but you are not entitled to you own facts.
I’m placing a bet that in 6 months time this map will be deemed far more accurate (at this time) even by the likes of the MSM.
hat is pretty much impossible. This map shows Kyiv as encircled but you could take a train to Kyiv today if you wanted to (and back). So how is it encircled?
I’m not sure, I think the red striped areas may signify artillery range and close air support. (the website is in Russian, so I only guess.) I haven’t heard of Kiev receiving further reinforcements from the Ukrainian military so in that sense it might be closed off. If the Russians wanted to, they could level Kiev with air bombings and artillery but what would be the point? I think Putin learned from the US experience in Iraq that “if you break it, you must repair it.” The ruble seems to have recovered to its pre-sanctioned levels but that’ll still be a big bill. Who’s to say they won’t come back after the Ukrainian units in Dunbass have been dealt with?
Maybe you don’t like that, maybe you wish that the Russian offensive had succeeded, etc. but reality doesn’t care about what you wish.
I really don’t have a dog in this fight. I was really hoping to buy more Russian 7.62×39 for my AK-47 until Biden enacted his Russian ammo ban. That’s the extent to my relations with Russia. (Though I’d totally shill for Putin if they delivered an AK-12 to my doorstep past US customs.) I’m not a Russian oligarch with a billion dollar yacht trying to evade western powers trying to seize muh big boat.
His only allies now are Belarus, Eritrea and N. Korea.
Isn’t he good friends with a extremely large Asian country led by Winnie-the-Pooh? I thought they were thrilled with that diverted oil and gas going their way. This stupid sanction garbage will lead Russia and China to become more interconnected than before. The exact opposite our financial elites wanted. It’s why Kissinger and others loathed the idea of NATO expansion.
Hunter Biden’s laptop is just changing the subject.
The MSM’s credibility score is around 300 and falling. The stuff they lie about as well as the stuff they get wrong impacts their overall score. Since when did they exhibit a correct take on a military conflict in the last twenty years? If it turns out that Zelinsky has been snorting blow in a Polish bunker for the last 25 days I wouldn’t be surprised.
I’m placing a bet that in 6 months time this map will be deemed far more accurate (at this time) even by the likes of the MSM. Right now they’re finally acknowledging Hunter Biden’s “Laptop from Hell.” The one that was sworn by the US intelligence community to be pure Russian propaganda. Though addressing this laptop now might signify Hillary Clinton’s attempt to bring down Biden so to become the 2024 Democratic nominee.
That is pretty much impossible. This map shows Kyiv as encircled but you could take a train to Kyiv today if you wanted to (and back). So how is it encircled? As I have said before, everyone is entitled to their own opinions on this war but you are not entitled to you own facts.
I’m placing a bet that in 6 months time this map will be deemed far more accurate (at this time) even by the likes of the MSM.
This means absolutely nothing. This is the classic “tactical retreat”. Although in this case, more of a strategic retreat. Pretty obvious that Russia will focus on the south and east to further block any attempt by NATO to replenish the Ukranian troops. Kiev is 100% irrelevant. Taking it has much more symbolic value than anything. Guns and ammunition are not manufactured inside cities. Nor are crops planted inside cities. Taking Kiev would have huge *psychological* effect in boosting the morale of Russian troops and crushing the morale of Ukranians. But the strategic relevance is nul.
Russia *could* use the strategy that I suggested of encircling Kiev and the other major cities, sieging them and starving the populations inside, resulting in their surrender. They have enough firepower with heavy artillary, and enough sheer infantry, to achieve that if they were willing to pay a higher cost in Russian sacrifice. That would be geopolitically relevant, but strategically wouldn’t accomplish much. Why? Because it would do nothing about the millions of Ukranians doing hit-and-run guerrilla warfare in thousands of villages and small cities across the country. Taking all of them by force would be an urban warfare nightmare, and undoable. Putin would be forced to level all of them to the gound, and it would be a PR disaster with over a million Ukranians killed. The only viable strategy is to starve the entire country to force them to surrender, and this is what Russia is doing by focusing on controlling ports and supply lines.
What I am flabbergasted about is the media narrative about this war. They act like Russia was exposed as a second-tier Power. Why? Because they weren’t able to conquer Europe’s 2nd largest country with a population of 45 million highly trained and organized people in the space of 30 days. According to the media, anything other than complete victory and conquest over such a large and capable country in the measly time frame of 30 days constitutes a “failure”(!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) It’s almost as if Ukraine were not the 2nd largest country in Europe with 45 million people with high technical and organizational capabilities, but some extremely tiny Banana Republic like Honduras or Belize. Completely conquering a country of that dimension and capability in the space of 30 days would be an almost unheard of military feat, one of the greatest if not the greatest military feat ever. The only thing that would compare would be the Wehrmacht’s 1940 conquest of France, but that had a lot more to do with the French not wanting to fight another war than anything else. And Ukraine is even larger than France.
There is also the issue of media hypocrisy, of Uncle Sam worship. Because the U.S stayed in southern vietnam for 11 years and failed to hold Hanoi, and yet no one in the media said the U.S had fallen to second-tier status as a Power because of that. More recently, the U.S left Afghanistan after being there for 15 years without accomplishing anything, and the Taliban returned to power, and the media said nothing about America being a second-tier military power. The hypocrisy and double-standard are shocking!
If it weren't for double standards the MSM wouldn't have any standards at all.
The hypocrisy and double-standard are shocking!
For the young 'uns--
Urban Dictionary: Roughneck
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Roughneck
Jan 08, 2012 · A person who preforms manual labor in the oilfields, typically in a drilling capacity. Can be onshore or offshore. Personnel who work in the oilfields but are not involved with drilling