Just another trump trump trump clickbait article. As if Trump recently invented this. Law has never been anything more than a myth in which the general populace may believe. It makes them feel better about their oppression.
Law is always and only to constrain the other guy, never the people who made it. U.S. leaders have always done whatever they wanted regardless of any so-called law. Any student of history knows this. This is true of all empires.
The one improvement with Trump is that he is a little less hypocritical about what he does.
“We’re going to bomb them so we can get their oil” is a little more straightforward than “We’re going to bomb them to protect civilians (and take their oil).”
To talk of “a moral framework” that held America together rings false to me.
In my lifetime I’ve witnessed the antics of LBJ, Slick Willie, W, Obama, and President Vegetable; I can divine no sense of a moral framework in their efforts.
But if there was a moral framework that held America together before those crooks took office it was presumably “manifest destiny” i.e. we’ll steal whatever we want from the natives and exterminate them when it suits us.
As if Trump recently invented this. Law has never been anything more than a myth in which the general populace may believe. It makes them feel better about their oppression.
Law is always and only to constrain the other guy, never the people who made it. U.S. leaders have always done whatever they wanted regardless of any so-called law. Any student of history knows this. This is true of all empires.
As if the monstrous fat orange bastard (MFOB) didn't choose to betray the constitution, his supporters, his fellow citizens, and his election mandate. As if the MFOB didn't enthusiastically choose to turn a bad situation into an even worse one - when the creature had a chance to do the opposite.
As if Trump recently invented this.
And any student of history would probably realize that in the age of hydrogen bombs and hypersonic missiles, u.s. "leaders" can no longer do whatever they want without the risk of catastrophic consequences. Unfortunately the MFOB's exceptional lawlessness will likely result in a nuclear war and the end of the world as we know it.Replies: @JunkyardDog
Law is always and only to constrain the other guy, never the people who made it. U.S. leaders have always done whatever they wanted regardless of any so-called law. Any student of history knows this. This is true of all empires.
Stop falling for the con and examine the actual record. The record is that your stupid political babble and voting are meaningless.
Obvious crap. Government and government alone is what takes money and freedon from anyone productive and hands it out to the inferior. It is clearly, exactly the white employment of government power against other whites that is and has always been the root of the problem.
This is precisly the opposite of Christianity which from the outset rejected excercising power over others.
I see this idea crop up on this website all the time. First, include theft and hypocrisy in the definition of “christanity”, and then assert that “chrisianity” is destructive. It’s nothing but a dishonest tautology.
With the blessings of the church. Rarely have any officially opposed government overreach of any sort. I know I know, they weren't "real chrischuns". Only your ilk passes the holy litmus test.
Government and government alone is what takes money and freedon from anyone productive and hands it out to the inferior.
And, with some ancient exceptions, all of those whites were christians, both winners and losers.
It is clearly, exactly the white employment of government power against other whites that is and has always been the root of the problem.
LMAO! You don't read/research much do you? It's obvious that you have never read anything that wasn't on your church's approved list. Deschner's 'Christianity's Criminal History' and Nixey's 'The Darkening Age' and a plethora of others prove you dead wrong.
This is precisly the opposite of Christianity which from the outset rejected excercising power over others.
I notice “christian” is always meaningless on this website. Include anything you want into the definition and then disparage “christianity” because it meets your own definition.
Same thing with countless ill-defined “isma”. Easy to bash if one inserts anything one would like into the defitition. It’s nothing more than tautology.
It’s a curious artifact of the slow shift from rational thought to emotional response. One characteristic is the move from particulars to generalizations.
If it's specifics that will scratch your itch, then that is my pleasure. The Abrahamic religions are based on the reverence of Abram/Abraham, of course, and therefore that Abraham satisfied his curious desert god that he had the right character by demonstrating his hurried willingness to perform a ritual human sacrifice of his own son, to procure his god's approval.
It’s a curious artifact of the slow shift from rational thought to emotional response. One characteristic is the move from particulars to generalizations.
This article illustrates why I never watch any movie “based on true events”. They ALWAYS give a false interpretation of reality and indeed probably necessarily so.
I’d rather watch fiction, which is a little less likely to be taken for history. I have enough false beliefs to deal with already.
White man still having difficulty recognizing that rabbi Jesus & Christianity were the heaviest blow that ever struck the Aryan race. Even most of the Nazi hierarchy continued viewing this Jew in a favorable light. Hitler in his ‘Wartime Conversations’ compiled by Bormann viewed Jesus as non-Jewish who ‘fought against the Jews’. I think Rosenberg as well adhered to this delusion that Jesus was an ‘Aryan’ too. The source of this misconception can be traced back to Wagner & HS Chamberlain who were central influences on the intellectual-spiritual development/philosophy of Hitler & the Nazis.
A.A.
“Customer” is more appropriate. The word implies some kind of agency whereas “consumer” is merely a passive object to be used.
I find it inbelievable the ignorance of commenters on this website.
Amazing.
You should review and analyze the deep meaning in the latest Tide detergent commercial.
Thinly veiled racism – “making clothes whiter”. Deep religious allegory – cleanliness is next to godliness. Misogyny – the woman washing clothes. Phony middle class values.
I tell ya it’s a work of genius.
1. For our children and grand children
If life lasts only 70 or 80 years, what possible incentive is there for making moral righteous decisions and actions.
I replied to littlereddot. Stay out of other people’s conversations.
thanks
Is this not the greatest flaw of the Democratic systems?
Why would any politician build a highspeed rail network if such an undertaking will take 2 decades? The cost will be upfront and the benefits only come much later.
If life lasts only 70 or 80 years, what possible incentive is there for making moral righteous decisions and actions. Is this not the greatest flaw of the Democratic systems?
1. For our children and grand children
If life lasts only 70 or 80 years, what possible incentive is there for making moral righteous decisions and actions.
For as in those days before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered the ark, and they did not understand until the flood came and took them all away; so will the coming of the Son of Man be.
At that time there will be two men in the field; one will be taken and one will be left. Two women will be grinding at the mill; one will be taken and one will be left.
For centuries the white dumdums believed some mongrel rabbi died for their ‘sins’–now they believe six zillion Jew were exterminated by ‘evil whites’. Different fairy tale–same white guilt trip.
Nobody hates Christianity more than hasbara and fevered “anti-Semitic” posters on this website refreshing their website every few seconds to condemn the historical religion of the west.
For centuries the white dumdums believed some mongrel rabbi died for their ‘sins’
Thanks Achmed. I have a personal conviction against acting as police or tax collector. I have never had a business license for example because the state would require me to collect taxes for them. Nope.
Like they say, you’re either one of the guards or one of the prisoners.
Tes, let’s get the government to solve the problem. They have done so well so far!
More laws more government!
Browse this website and look at the comments section. It’s filled with destructive generalities: whites, blacks, democrats, republicans, immigrants, boomers, Gen X, Somalians, humans, deniers, jews, etc. – followed by villification. The groups are often deliberately vague and arbitrary so that people can easily be added or removed from the group. Say Americans are fat lazy ignorant people. Then find a fat lazy ignorant American to prove the point. It’s circular thinking.
(And you often get the low intelligence “not all” reply any moron could think up that adds nothing to the conversation. “Not all Negros are black! There are albinos!”).
A whole bunch of imaginary groups to vilify, avoiding any particular person or a particular characteristic or action. This makes it possible to use generalized guilt. Many people take on the guilt. (The ridiculous response to black slavery for example.) But since no particular person is accused of a particular specific immoral action, the guilt cannot be rationally removed. It’s fake, but the effect on the individual is real. There is no specific immoral action to correct, so fake guilt can’t be removed but – oh joy! – it can be constantly assuaged with destructive political activism.
Vilifying vaguely defined groups of people enables further division and control.
Regarding statistics. Let’s say southerners are mostly inbred hillbillies. Even if true this tells me nothing about the next southerner I meet. That person will be an individual, a particular person.
However and here is the crux the matter: categorizing people in generalized groups is of primary importance only to government, and for the purpose of government oppression. Only government is able to apply force to an entire group. This is clearly seen everywhere. It’s identity politics very broadly defined. Any legislation that addresses groups of people actually attacks individual persons. One way or another.
The inability to deal with particularities is a serious mental deficiency broadly destructive to society in many ways.
This is of course compounded by the proliferation of subversive and harmful music much worse than even the kitschy schmalz of Lee Greenwood. Madonna, Katy Perry, Rihanna, Snoop Dogg (real name Calvin Coldoazor Broadus). Cardi B and now Sabrina Carpenter are unavoidable icons of American “culture” and society.
The lack of self-awareness could not be more obvious. If you dislike subversiveness and its proliferation is harmful, much worse than Lee Greenwood &c, why do you then quote a Death in June song three paragraphs before this denunciation?
If this subversion is so harmful, and given your comments on the Wehrmacht and Hitler before then, why are you a fan of a National Bolshevist/Strasserist solo act fronted by a fat gay English man who idolises Ernst Röhm and the SA’s gay underground, dresses up in Nazi uniforms, and combines the totenkopf with gay pride flags at practically every concert? Who writes songs like Hollows of Devotion about him having gay sex in public toilets with a priest. Here is Runes and Men, one of his more popular songs; a homosexual love song according to him, sung in peadot camo and an SS sniper’s veil.
So much better than that subversive shit, this is true art like Mozart, right? You know, the classical-era composer who wrote songs like Leck mich im Arsch to sing at parties with his friends … wait, maybe a bad example.
And if you think the above sounds bad, you will need be driven to suicide if you read about industrial music (and thus neofolk’s) origins: just look up that freak Genesis P-Orridge, of Throbbing Gristle fame. Luckily, I haven’t in long enough myself to be able to remember the details, but they are probably the most insane non-criminal person I’ve read of before. Yet you devote so many words to this banal American appealing only to the kind of trailer trash that makes up the US military!
Let us not forget, per NYT, Death in June is now military music too with its merch seen on Ukrainian soldiers; no surprise why if one looks at DIJ’s Facebook page (if it’s still there), given his support for Azov sorts and killing white Russian “orcs:” https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/05/world/europe/nazi-symbols-ukraine.html
Though you are probably some 4chan kid because neofolk is popular now and most of it all trash, and so I doubt you are even old enough to have been to a concert (and to have enjoyed the always accompanying antifa protests) while Douglas P still played. Or to know what industrial music is.
Nonetheless the contradictions of this denunciation are absurd, and I’m sure all the more apparent to anyone who has never heard of Death in June or this music scene given the accuracy of my above descriptions. If subversive art is the worst of all, how is this a less harmful form of it than shittier music that’s more banal, but far less subversive?
Clearly you have no consistency in values whatsoever and just go off of your feelings of what you like and dislike, then justify it post hoc. After finding a previous essay of yours laughable in the clearly apparent nonexistence of musical education, I gave this one a shot and thought it was not too bad up until this point, but this is absurd. Either stop this idiocy and get new views on art and subversion, or stop this fraud of artistic conservatism and stop listening to modern popular music altogether; get an education in classical and traditional music. Ridiculous.
Sort of “church”. The term is as meaningless as “Christian”. For the actual Christian church, this commandment applies:
“For even when we were with you, we used to give you this order: if anyone is not willing to work, then he is not to eat, either.” St. Paul
Ongoing support of bums is explicitly un-christian.
We might be amazed at the motivation starvation can be.
As Andrew Anglin stupidly states, Trump could solve the problem of illegals through harsh penalties for employing and harbouring. Total BS that shows no understanding of government or law.
This idea simply shoves the responsibility off onto the general public trying to force them to be police.
Government can establish and enforce a border, NOT try to force me to mitigate the consequences of their poor performance.
Sure I’m responsible for policing – my own person and property. If I want to check ID, I’m free to do so. If I don’t want to check ID, I’m going to be free not to do so.
This person’s solution to government failure is – MORE LAWS, MORE GOVERNMENT!
Incredible.
Something you lay on while you’re having sex.
The Jews revealed this scheme many years ago in the movie ‘The Devil’s Advocate’ (1997) where Pacino playing the Devil exclaims how the plan is for the lawyers (aka Jews) to continuously acquit all the scum & precipitate the collapse of society into moral/social chaos–thus dissolving ‘civilization’ & morphing it into a Judeo-Communist wog dystopia. The film doesn’t explicitly state anything about a ‘Judeo-Communist wog dystopia’ of course, but what other outcome can there be from these pro-criminal policies? The Commies know what they’re doing. Of course the ‘Devil’ gets blamed for all this in the movie–not the Jews or God (Yahweh).
A.A.
You want it to be illegal to knowingly circulate AI video footage and pass it off as real?
Of course you do, you’re retarded.
You want AI companies to be severely penalized if they don’t prevent people from using their products to generate fake videos that get passed off as real?
Hell yeah homie, you’re retarded.
You want generative AI companies to be forced to place highly visible warnings across all AI-generated videos?
Bless your retarded twelve year-old heart.
You want AI companies to be harshly penalized if their chatbots psychologically manipulate users ?
Yeah, that checks out, you’re retarded.
You want it to be illegal for politicians to use AI deepfakes of their opponents saying outrageous things in their political campaigns?
Because everyone is retarded now?
Governments should intervene to end these assaults on our ability to perceive and understand our world. I really don’t care how much force needs to be used to rein this shit in.
Why are statists like this? ☮️
Nope. Lying AI photos and videos is the best thing that could happen to the U.S. at this time. Flooding the media with phony videos and photos, fake news articles, fake research papers, etc. will hasten the process of neutralizing government propaganda.
Anyone familiar with the content of this website for example knows the public is fed a constant barrage of government backed lies that they mostly believe. Once media is flooded with obvious lies, people will slowly but surely come to realize that nothing they see there can be believed. Then the next COVID or war propaganda campaign will not be so easy to sell.
““My inheritance has become to Me
Like a lion in the forest;
She has roared against Me;
Therefore I have come to hate her.
Jeremiah 12:8
The problem for Christian dupes arguing against the notion of a Judeo-Christianity is that their religion, Christianity, is based on the suppositions in the OT being true. They are not true, for one thing there is no god choosing one tribe or people. That false idea, is what binds Christians to Jews, and it is fatal. First of all there is no "god" as the OT describes, the entire text is a fabrication, we know that because there was never a Abraham (a blatant ripoff of Brahma). God never handed us any commandments, he never made a land deal with a Covenant. Those false ideas, however, are central to Christian religion, thus the Judeo-Christian meme sticks and is valid, Christianity revolves around the Jewish OT narrative. Without it, Christianity makes no sense.
The Chosen of God
Surely one of the most deleterious notions in the false “Judeo-Christian” cultural universe is that of Jews as the contemporary “chosen people” of God. (TheJewishRoad) The Hebrew nation, the descendants of Abraham, was indeed “chosen” by God as the stewards of the Divine Law and, most importantly, the people from whom the Messiah, Jesus Christ, was to come. As the Lord Himself affirmed, “Salvation is of the Jews”. (John 4:22)
In order for the Christian need of salvation, the story of god judging Adam and Eve and expelling them cursed from the Garden must be true. That is a fable, not history, not a true supposition. There was never a need to get salvation because the foundational story is false. No one needs Jesus (who never existed) because the judging god of the Hebrews/Jews is fiction. God never said that, he never wrote it, tribal propagandists stole other people's mythology and wrote it in a supremacist fashion favoring them.
John Kaminski - 3 sides of the same coin - "Judaism and Christianity are JOINED AT THE HIP SEAMLESSLY ALL THE WAY UP TO THE TOPS OF THEIR HEADS in an inoperable Siamese twin condition. The only way you can destroy Jews and Judaism is to destroy Christianity. You cannot put the cart before the horse. The Christian cannot divest himself of the influence of the Jew without throwing out the dogma of the Bible. If you rally around Christianity you circle the wagons around the Jew."
Nope. The absolutely perfect inspiration of the scriptures was conclusively proven a century ago by simple math. This is not some opinion nor can it be denied.
Anyone with a modicum of understading of the original languages can confirm this for themselves.
This proves nothing about the truth of the scriptures, only that the author of the texts could not be human.
I suggest you fortify your learning by looking into the numeric patterns found in the original manuscripts. I have shown some of this evidence to others who simply refuse objective reality rather than face the implications. For that reason, I never do any research for others but the information is freely available.
Here are my conclusions:
TUR commenters have taken an oath to ignore Taylor and DeAnna. What reason do they give? "They don't name the jew!" TUR commenters screech.Big mistake in my opinion. Why? Because Taylor and DeAnna analyze and document what might be called 'facts on the ground,' that is they analyze and document the post-jewish situation, the extremity to which American whites have been reduced by jewish domination...
Enough 'quotes.' Here's the ultimate conclusion:Whites are responsible for their own demise, no one else. Whites were warned innumerable times about the jews, but they were too stupid to... take steps.Shall we shuffle quietly into the dark? Or shall we wreak havoc on the way?Replies: @NobodyImportant, @Exalted Cyclops, @Tarnhari, @Guest Perfect, @MLK, @Che Guava
● Whites want to die. Barring nuclear annihilation America will devolve into a mongrel nation unlike any other in human history. It will be long after we're dead. But, like it or it not, that is the America of the future.● The awful truth, the truth from which White Americans avert their eyes as they march into the dustbin of history is exactly what DeAnna says:"Admit the third world into your country, Whites, and you will be looted, dispossessed, and wiped out.”● The time for resolutions is past. The time for action is past. There is not a goddamn thing we can do to change anything whatsoever.You’ve heard of ‘niche markets,’ right? Well, ‘niche refuges’ are our future—places and strategies that will enable you to live out what remains of your own life. Forget the next generation. The white race doesn’t have that much time.
Whites are responsible for their own demise, no one else. Whites were warned innumerable times about the jews, but they were too stupid to… take steps.
Irrefutably true. Some are too stupid but more are too corrupt and care only about their own status. Whites have been warned by their own best minds for over a century now about this. While I have absolute zero sympathy for the Synagogue of Satan (Christ’s own term for what is called modern Judaism), at the end of the day they could not have done all of this damage on their own. Whites are a party to their own destruction, arguably even more guilty of the crime than the Kosher Nosetra is. There are literally millions of whites in Europe, America and elsewhere would would gladly line up every single commenter here against a wall and machine-gun them and their families for such crimethink, just to keep the shekels coming for some more worthless crap.
Even Hungary, who is admittedly not as bad off as a place like Ireland, refuses to leave the EUSSR and NATO. Orban and his party will eventually lose and Soros and his ilk will immediately flood the place with the worst of the worst – with the full aid and assistance of local traitors. Until sufficient numbers of whites internalize that these people want them dead and are willing to take the action required to bring these mortal enemies down, it will only continue.
The whole sordid mess is like the Tale of the Old Grandmother writ large:
I once asked [Grandma], when she came on a visit, what her problem with Jews was.
Her answer struck me as Old Lady ranting then, but I have realized since that it is so true as to almost be a mystical Truth.
She said: “The Jew will look at a pile of shit and say ‘That’s gold!’ Then, he’ll look at a pile of gold and say ‘That’s shit!’ And then he’ll find ten other Jews to rewrite every book and newspaper within reach until YOU and your kids look at the shit and agree that ‘Yes, shit is gold and gold is shit!’ Then, while you are putting shit in your pockets, he’ll take all the gold and share it with his ten other Jews. It’s their NATURE.”
Her statement is true on so many levels that it blows my mind. Criminals are victims, victims are criminals, truth is a lie, immoral is moral, shit is gold. Oy vey.
And so here we are. We’ve no right to be surprised or shocked. It was totally predictable.
I am not sure who is more to blame, the Jews or the morons who are led by the nose by Jews, and who even after the nature of the deceit is explained to them, they keep preferring to be misled and balk at you, instead.
She said: “The Jew will look at a pile of shit and say ‘That’s gold!’ Then, he’ll look at a pile of gold and say ‘That’s shit!’ And then he’ll find ten other Jews to rewrite every book and newspaper within reach until YOU and your kids look at the shit and agree that ‘Yes, shit is gold and gold is shit!’ Then, while you are putting shit in your pockets, he’ll take all the gold and share it with his ten other Jews. It’s their NATURE.”
"EUSSR?" I think you're actually referring to the "Jewropean Union."
Even Hungary, who is admittedly not as bad off as a place like Ireland, refuses to leave the EUSSR...
I started this article, but had to stop. It’s too painful. I’ll be 84 in January, I’ll be out of this unimaginable apocalypse soon. Why should I read more? Why should I pore over every new horror-statistic? Why should I make myself even more miserable?
To anyone who was paying attention, the jewish conspiracy to destroy the white race became clear half a century or more ago. The participation in that conspiracy of white elites also became clear. With every year the looming catastrophe became more difficult to ignore. But whites ignored it.
The few whites who spoke out were demonized by the jewish media and white elites. They were ostracized by their own white peers. What even was the point of speaking out? What is the point of speaking out? Just to hear yourself denounced as a defeatist? Mark Levin was right, “‘We’ cancelled Pat Buchanan.”
As for Taylor’s article, let me quote myself:
TUR commenters have taken an oath to ignore Taylor and DeAnna. What reason do they give? “They don’t name the jew!” TUR commenters screech.
Big mistake in my opinion.
Why? Because Taylor and DeAnna analyze and document what might be called ‘facts on the ground,’ that is they analyze and document the post-jewish situation, the extremity to which American whites have been reduced by jewish domination…
Here are my conclusions:
● Whites want to die. Barring nuclear annihilation America will devolve into a mongrel nation unlike any other in human history. It will be long after we’re dead. But, like it or it not, that is the America of the future.
● The awful truth, the truth from which White Americans avert their eyes as they march into the dustbin of history is exactly what DeAnna says:
“Admit the third world into your country, Whites, and you will be looted, dispossessed, and wiped out.”
● The time for resolutions is past. The time for action is past. There is not a goddamn thing we can do to change anything whatsoever.
You’ve heard of ‘niche markets,’ right? Well, ‘niche refuges’ are our future—places and strategies that will enable you to live out what remains of your own life. Forget the next generation. The white race doesn’t have that much time.
Enough ‘quotes.’ Here’s the ultimate conclusion:
Whites are responsible for their own demise, no one else. Whites were warned innumerable times about the jews, but they were too stupid to… take steps.
Shall we shuffle quietly into the dark? Or shall we wreak havoc on the way?
Irrefutably true. Some are too stupid but more are too corrupt and care only about their own status. Whites have been warned by their own best minds for over a century now about this. While I have absolute zero sympathy for the Synagogue of Satan (Christ's own term for what is called modern Judaism), at the end of the day they could not have done all of this damage on their own. Whites are a party to their own destruction, arguably even more guilty of the crime than the Kosher Nosetra is. There are literally millions of whites in Europe, America and elsewhere would would gladly line up every single commenter here against a wall and machine-gun them and their families for such crimethink, just to keep the shekels coming for some more worthless crap.
Whites are responsible for their own demise, no one else. Whites were warned innumerable times about the jews, but they were too stupid to… take steps.
And so here we are. We've no right to be surprised or shocked. It was totally predictable.Replies: @anonymous, @Lackadaisical Reader, @mocissepvis, @Joe Webb
I once asked [Grandma], when she came on a visit, what her problem with Jews was.
Her answer struck me as Old Lady ranting then, but I have realized since that it is so true as to almost be a mystical Truth.
She said: “The Jew will look at a pile of shit and say ‘That’s gold!’ Then, he’ll look at a pile of gold and say ‘That’s shit!’ And then he’ll find ten other Jews to rewrite every book and newspaper within reach until YOU and your kids look at the shit and agree that ‘Yes, shit is gold and gold is shit!’ Then, while you are putting shit in your pockets, he’ll take all the gold and share it with his ten other Jews. It’s their NATURE.”
Her statement is true on so many levels that it blows my mind. Criminals are victims, victims are criminals, truth is a lie, immoral is moral, shit is gold. Oy vey.
This is a common psychological quirk. It is a way to denigrate the object of hatred by elevating a similar but inferior object in comparison. Simply put, they do not love blacks, they use blacks to hate whites.
The more wary black people do realize they are being used.
All two of them.
"The more wary black people do realize they are being used. "
Nation of Islam, for example.
he more wary black people do realize they are being used.
Yet another old tired “wake up sheeple” article. It’s the secular version of the doctrine of original sin. We need to be saved!
Yup. If only christians were immoral they could rule the world.
Instead, they're all impotent and living out their last days bleating "christ is kang" - whilst calling everyone that confronts them and their certified kosher delusions a jew. These one trick gelded ponies sold/sell out their own race by gleefully accepting the 'morality' demanded of them by their pantheon of semitic desert rats and their traitorous ministers still parading around sucking off the abundance of shekels still up for grabs.
If only christians were immoral they could rule the world.
The author continues to promote government propaganda while further supporting government propganda.
Social security, welfare, soldier pay, food stamps, etc. NONE of these things is a demand. The demand comes directly from immoral taxation at the point of a gun. THAT is what takes my money.
The idea that I am supposed to blame welfare moms, illegal aliens or social security seniors for government theft is completely irrational, like most of the propaganda the populace is sold on. Just blame anything and everybody except those actually responsible. Then fight with your neighbors while government takes even more.
Grow up. Big money is in an economic war against most of the population of the U.S. The more money or value the average person can get from them the better it will be for everybody. Tactics in this war include using political pressure of every kind to claw back value from the thieves.
Beat the dead horse over and over and over again. “Proving” the goverment lies to us? Do you understand how ridiculous this is?
Hey, hundreds of comments so works as click bait, but stuff like this is why I rarely visit this website.
For purportedly Christian people, elderly Americans seem to be surprisingly glad to suffer very unpleasant circumstances in exchange for lengthening their lives by a week or two. It's not what I'd expect from people who ought to be happy to meet their Maker.
The author jumps the shark while weighing in on spiraling cratering talkpocalypse.
That being said, eyeball the skyrocketing, jaw-dropping breathlessly scapegoating as he doubles down on pearl-clutching bombshell…
Oh never mind…
A progressive tax has the advantage of continuously automatically getting raised as inflation pushes everyone into high and higher tax brackets. It’s a government dream.
Remember the Alternative Minimum tax? Get those rich deadbeats to pay their fair share. And slowly but surely, the rich deadbeats become almost everybody. Climbed like crazy until 2010, then reduced but began climbing again. More recent reductions are set to expire in 2025.
Pass progressive taxes, then just sit back, relax, and watch inflation eat everybody.
It should be pointed out that no income tax at all is necessary. Government can simply print money and inflate everyone’s assets away. This could be done without the estimated 50 cent compliance cost for every dollar collected through income tax.
I’m not even remotely close to the target demo of this film, so my opinion is of modicum value at best, however-
1) Among the myriad things that I could care less to see, a “back story” for the The Wizard of Oz, has to be high on that list. This movie was old, the day I was born, and while I recognize it’s role in the history of cinema… geez, who gives a shit!? (probably just gay men, and really old women? Younger women? The movie came out in 1939!)
2) Even if I cared one wit about this story, the movie, or anything about it, there is one thing that turned me off, right out of the gate- That God awful, ugly excuse for a face, worn by hideous looking Cynthia Erivo!! Sweet Christ she is UGLY! And painting that butt ugly mug green!? And this isn’t entertaining level “ugly”, it’s sickening to my stomach fugly! i.e. painful to look at! She has a face that should never be seen again, neither in film or photo.
3) I’m tired of seeing Classic Movies, re-done, re-interpreted, or IP mined for modern, garbage content. Of course they’d make the whole thing a faggot fest! Because the original had absolutely nothing to do with being a queer, or a green faced ugly black bitch, so naturally, that is what this is all about.
4) lastly, fuck the wicked witch of the west! She was a villain, an old hag, that got destroyed, let’s just leave it at that! I don’t need her back story! If you wanted to explore back stories, do the Scarecrow, the Wizard, the Lion, the Tinman? Nah, let’s get the ugliest black bitch on the planet, paint her green, and tell her story…
Hollywood is garbage!
Hear, hear! My mother loved The Wizard of Oz and we had to watch it when it came on once a year. We only had 1 TV in those days. I thought it blew dead dogs even as a yute. Judy Garland was way too old for the part, and the whole thing was stupid even to me as a kid.2) And I never got the appeal of Sarah Jessica Parker. She had a horse face even when younger.
Among the myriad things that I could care less to see, a “back story” for the The Wizard of Oz, has to be high on that list. This movie was old, the day I was born, and while I recognize it’s role in the history of cinema… geez, who gives a shit!?
Fyi: "Modicum" is a noun, not an adjective.
I’m not even remotely close to the target demo of this film, so my opinion is of modicum value at best...
Beyond the nose, the essence of witchiness is a face that looks attractive when young but isn’t likely to age well: Think of Sarah Jessica Parker in 1991’s L.A. Story
Just compelled to say it, Sarah Jessica Parker has the face of a horse. (I would not be so rude about a normie gal, but Miss Parker chose to thrust herself onto our screens.)
There is nothing wrong with being average looking. Most people, by definition, look kind of average. I’m sure Sarah is a wonderful wife to–looked it up–Matthew Broderick, and wonderful loving mom to their children. I wish their family well.
But simply can’t not understand why this woman was all over movies and TV, when there are millions of actually attractive American gals out there who would love to be in movies and probably 1% or so can do a reasonable job acting. Much less cast in anything to do with romance or with “sex” in the title. “Sex” is not what comes to mind seeing her. More like “anyone have an apple”.
Market research: What’s the target audience for SATC? AnotherDad types? Or instead a large cohort of “mid” or lesser-looking women wanting to imagine themselves in a fantasy life? If it’s the latter, it worked.
Much less cast in anything to do with romance or with “sex” in the title. “Sex” is not what comes to mind seeing her. More like “anyone have an apple”.
I know what you mean but I can't resist mentioning that a face made up of an average-sized mouth, nose and eyes, with an average distance between the eyes, and everything perfectly symmetric comes across as strikingly beautiful.
Most people, by definition, look kind of average
“Gay Catholic children’s author” huh?
This whole notion of prequelling classics and vandalizing them with phony diversity is akin to spray painting a black drug-dealer serving fentanyl on the canvas of the Mona Lisa and claiming that’s why she was really smiling.
Imagine you lost the genetic lottery. You are born ugly and obnoxious. Then, would you not see differently? The beautiful seem oppressing. The fit seem to grate on you. Sublime beauty and healthy bodies are the opposite of you and yours. The frat boys are bullying you. The frat girls pay you no mind. These piss poor movies are the revenge of the deviants. Where the ugly are different but pretty on the inside. Where the obnoxious are cool and daring. Where pretty girls are stupid and great looking guys are all bullies. Hollyweird is the Capitol of the deviants and freaks. There, the fit are ridiculed. The sublime is oppressing. And, the pure and moral are laughed at. With a nervous laughter. This lousy casting is indicative of neuroses. An example of insecurity and malicious envy. The smug superiority complex is a mask that hides the inferiority complex inherent in these people. Movies, art and culture are all derided and turned ugly by cretins who are themselves ugly. You can judge a book by the cover. Unfit creatures have genetic flaws. And, dark complexions are a sign of aggressive behavior. Believe the opposite of what they say and the truth will be revealed.
Correct. People are hard-wired to follow a leader. The whole point of the Gospel message is the kingdom of God – a world with NO human government. The choice is accept God’s rule or goverment. There are no other choices.
I would say this is a cluelessly sophmoric screed about the Bible and its contents, but it seems more like a rehash of other cluelessly sophmoric screeds.
Why is it that other nations aren’t “the” nation? Why not the Germany or the France? Or the Russia?
Why only the Ukraine?
Is it not really a nation but a geographic area?
This is the message that is heard by more in every new generation. God is dead, long since killed by science, but his corpse is still lively even as the last of its vitality drains away. I find it equally gratifying and amusing to witness all three patriarchal faiths in their death throes fragmenting back into the extremist cults they evolved from. The phenomenon is like a supernova, the final brilliant flash of star that collapses in on itself after its fuel is exhausted and it goes dark forever.
Truly a brave and unique human being.
Quite a laundry list of genocides. I, of course, knew of each of them but never saw the totality of the slaughter governments represent all listed together. I instantly thought of the individuals that did the actual killings, soldiers mostly or planned lack of resources that soldiers and other scum like police enforced. It may be the sociopath(s) at the top of each incident that barked out the orders, but it was always the human costumed trash that took the orders to purposely harm ‘the other’.
We may all agree that a Stalin or Pol Pot was a monster, but how is it that the very people who did the physical act of killing, maiming, destroying infrastructure, etc, the soldiers, the police, the security guards, call them what you will, get a pass by the bulk of the population? How is it that the actual killers get labeled as ‘veterans’ and that term cleanses their activities to the point that their murders become noble and deserving of a life long pension?
What should one think of the ‘Polizisten’ that did the actual pick up of Ms. Haverbeck to deliver her to prison? Should we all give them a pass for just ‘following orders’, for just doing their jobs?
People – look at yourselves, those of you that support the State, that demand gov’t exist, that ‘Back The Blue’, that thank them ‘for their service’, that vote to enforce a system that keeps the little monsters like yourselves immunized from the harm you actually cause.
It’s not ‘the jews’. It’s you!
Good point, Bill.
We may all agree that a Stalin or Pol Pot was a monster, but how is it that the very people who did the physical act of killing, maiming, destroying infrastructure, etc, the soldiers, the police, the security guards, call them what you will, get a pass by the bulk of the population? How is it that the actual killers get labeled as ‘veterans’ and that term cleanses their activities to the point that their murders become noble and deserving of a life long pension?
https://oceanofpdf.com/authors/david-irving/pdf-nuremberg-the-last-battle-download/Replies: @RoatanBill
Using the unpublished diaries and papers of the principal actors David Irving takes a close-quarters look at the trial which finally ended World War Two. There would be few crimes listed in the indictment at Nuremberg of which one or other of the four prosecuting powers was not guilty of itself. In the cause of defeating Adolf Hitler, civilian populations had been burned and blasted, murdered, brutalised, intimidated, deported, and enslaved; aggressive wars had been launched, neutral countries occupied by pretext and deceit, and the unalterable paragraphs of international conventions flagrantly violated.
LOL, I like the way My Boy Bill always fires a "you pathetic dogs aren't worthy of my presence, but I will entertain you anyway" shot at you guys somewhere in his diatribe.
People – look at yourselves, those of you that support the State, that demand gov’t exist, that ‘Back The Blue’, that thank them ‘for their service’, that vote to enforce a system that keeps the little monsters like yourselves immunized from the harm you actually cause
Psilocybe-bearing mushrooms are not any kind of “drug of abuse” or “party drug”. The idea of grouping them with opiates or other substances is absurd. IMHO.
Stupid article. Psylocybin is not addictive, generally has no negative health effects, and death by overdose is extemely rare. Use of pslocybin has been shown to result in less violent or crminal behavior. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0269881117735685?journalCode=jopa
It’s not even comparable to the usual street drugs.
Dig a little deper and you will find that the porn industry is behind the opposition since it will put them out of business.
AI pornography is simply easier, cheaper, and safer than the real thing.
Not sure how “underage” anyone supposedly was, but in my state 16 is the age of legal consent. They can have sex with anyone they want.
Got to use the latest internet jargon until it is completely worn out. Destruction of language is part of the new world order project. (see Orewll for example)
How about:
throw under the bus
pearl clutching
weighed in
funneling
gain traction
paints a picture
doubles down
jump the shark
gaslighting
spiraling
cratering
soaring
bombshell
jaw dropping
throw under the bus
skyrocketing
parroting
shuttering
breathlessly
scapegoating
adding -pocalypse or -mageddon to anything
This is a very well written and well reasoned article. But a statement like this one…
I have wondered for years why liberal Americans, to stay with the accepted term, nurse so visceral a hatred of Donald Trump
… is instructive.
“Liberal Americans” equate Donald Trump with Adolf Hitler. Literally, not hyperbolically. And they actually have a point.
Nationalism, in its truest form – not “Civic Nationalism” with its “magic dirt hypothesis”, but actual Nationalism, holding the well-being of the nation (a genetically related people) and their country (land) to be the duty of the State – is truly “racism”. It is racialist. And while Trump himself is actually a civnat, his pandering to a more authentic Buchanan-esque nationalism evokes paroxysms of rage in the religiously anti-racist American left.
Because you see, racism is the most profound existential evil there is, Hitler was therefore the devil incarnate, and ANY evocation of a world view remotely consistent with his outlook must be destroyed at all costs.
That’s Holocaustianity, my friends. It’s a religion, and the Second World War is its creation myth. This is the heart of the matter, and without reference to its origin – that is to say, without reference to the Jewish Question – one will always be puzzled, as is this (very good) author, at our society, its culture, and the trajectory of its history.
The old boomer postwar philosemitism, with its “hurr durr you’re just blaming ‘da joos’ because you’re a failure”, just doesn’t hold water. In fact, the boomer who so opines is merely aping the programming of his instructors in media and education, who make literal careers out of “proving” that antisemitism is a form of madness with no rational basis.
In fact, to comprehend the story arc of the last 200 years, its culmination in the 20th “Jewish century”, and its careening course towards a third World War, one must refer constantly to the collective machinations of this narcissistic, neurotic “chosen people”. Without reference to that foundational context, an analysis such as this article presents will never be complete.
“The lottery preys on vulnerable people. The people most likely to habitually play the lottery are typically poor, largely minorities, and often addicts. The Journal of Gambling studies found that lowest fifth in terms of socio-economic status has the highest rate of playing the lottery. Most lottery tickets are bought in poor neighborhoods because people in poor neighborhoods play much more frequently.”
The poor temporarily buy a dream. For oppressed people, voting has the same effect. They can dream for a while. After losing they can play again next election.
Checked the first couple paragraphs, then did a word search. The singular pronoun “I” appears over 75 times.
Which means the whole article is narcissistic garbage.
I’m not going to read this one.
I’ve read several, and they’ve all presented the author as more discerning and rational than everyone else, whatever the topic.
What’s Mr. Stark’s résumé look like?
How’d he escape relative obscurity at Substack to become the latest shooting star (see also Revusky, Raches) at The Unz Review?
Is there any particular “neo-maga” person? Or is this just another imaginary straw man to knock down?
Voting for government programs directly equals theft of property through taxation. It’s morally wrong.
Voting for the better of two people is simply voting for a little less evil. Morally wrong.
Voting for any law is simply an effort to control others by force. Again, morally wrong.
About the only vote I can imagine being any good is voting against further evil such as opportunities to remove laws, controls, and taxes. This is fairly rare.
How can someone write a 1,900 word essay entitled
Voting Is a Waste of Time! or Is It?
focused on Donald Trump while making no comparison of his 2016 campaign promises to his 2017-2021 term in office?
The 2024 presidential election of Donald Trump proved that voting works. It’s not that voting alone will accomplish all that we want, but it is one of numerous tools at our disposal to bring about the kind of country that we envision for ourselves and our posterity.
Facial nonsense. The efficacy of the 2024 presidential election of Donald Trump – having just occurred – in respect of what it will accomplish can only begin to be assessed once he starts announcing Cabinet and other appointments and will be (dis)proven after he takes office in January. There’s a pretty dismal database from 2016-2021 about that, but Mr. Kane prefers appeals to race, arguments against straw men, and smearing non-voters as disloyal.
Another example of the author’s confusion (or dishonesty?) on this distinction:
The enemies of Trump threw everything they could at him. Neither endless lawfare, constant threats of imprisonment, millions of dollars in government fines, and even two assassination attempts were sufficient in preventing him from winning the election. This occurred not because enough gullible citizens believed that voting was a waste of time, but because reasonable people were discerning enough to realize that they could destroy the Left’s political efforts by simply casting a vote for Trump.
Mr. Kane apparently has never thought critically about whether Red+Blue elections are puppet shows to channel and blow off dissent by getting people to simply cast votes at each other. Maybe he’ll participate here in the comments, and we’ll see.
I believe it was a typo/autocorrection problem, and you actually meant to write "farcical nonsense"?The farce to me, is that in a world superpower, the choice for the highest office in the land is a choice between Trump and Harris.350 million people to choose from, and the system can only present these two as choices? The system is seriously broken.This has happened in a country that once inspired the world with its democracy.Now 7 billion people are wondering if democracy is really all it is cracked up to be.Replies: @Roger, @Greta Handel, @kiwk
Facial nonsense.
“and still no one does anything except wring their hands and whine or shout in vain for a savior”
This is a clear and direct lie. It’s typical of these “everything’s wrong” hacks. Always bitter and looking for anything to blame, especially the victims.
Yup, told us a lot about our fellow Americans. It proved that most of them are deploables, garbage, and clingers.
“By this token, it is better to teach Blacks how to sell peanuts and bananas to other Blacks rather than attain the skills perfected by those who have attained what is surely an economic gold standard, an ultimate measure of success, by trading on Wall Street. ”
No, that is not the point of the quote at all and indicates the author is on an irrational polemic, not anbalysis.
Not really as the article suggests. Expressing praise for a similar but inferior item is a common method of denigrating the superior. The unfavorable comparison is not primarily meant to praise an item but to unfavorably compare the item with an inferior one.
Thus exalting jews or blacks is not, as one might believe on the surface, an expression of love for jews or blacks. It is a backhanded method of hating whites.
The author follows right along by hating “boomers”.
I ignore all articles that do nothing more than argue with somebody else. Want to share your ideas? State them plainly. I can read arguements all day long in the comments section if I want.
Yes. I have tried to post some of the scientific studies but it is always censored.
“Scapegoating” is not a word. Use real words.
They begin sentences with “well” over 60 times! Honestly, can’t anybody just talk anymore?
Amazing to me, but lots of people literally can’t tell the difference between giving and taking.
Almost universal example here: If I tell a Christian business man that withholding tax is literally withholding wages and is clearly a sin condemned in both old and new testaments, the reply is “Jesus commanded to render to Caesar!” They can’t tell the difference between taking and paying.
Libertarians are completely insane with this. They claim that accepting social security, something freely given, is actually theft because the government might have taken money from somebody else to pay it. Unable to tell the difference between taking something freely offered and stealing.
There are many examples of this kind of thinking.