The Jews revealed this scheme many years ago in the movie ‘The Devil’s Advocate’ (1997) where Pacino playing the Devil exclaims how the plan is for the lawyers (aka Jews) to continuously acquit all the scum & precipitate the collapse of society into moral/social chaos–thus dissolving ‘civilization’ & morphing it into a Judeo-Communist wog dystopia. The film doesn’t explicitly state anything about a ‘Judeo-Communist wog dystopia’ of course, but what other outcome can there be from these pro-criminal policies? The Commies know what they’re doing. Of course the ‘Devil’ gets blamed for all this in the movie–not the Jews or God (Yahweh).

A.A.

The George Floyd/Breonna Taylor hoaxes represented a great advancement for anarcho-tyranny. That is when many urban police departments were destroyed and turned against law abiding citizens while career black criminals run wild. There is no question that organized jewry has normalized black crime and violence and normalized the attack on legitimate self defense.

You can have a firearm but if you use it to protect yourself from a black attacker, you are the one that will be investigated and that includes both average citizens and the police themselves. That is why police go to great lengths to avoid shooting a black perp. It simply isn’t worth it.

Sam Francis was a prophet. The seeds for anarcho-tyranny were probably established as far back as the 1950s and 1960s when freedom of association was undermined through forced desegregation. At that point, it became clear that the constitutional rights of some groups could be abrogated to serve the interests of other groups. Affirmative action also created conditions wherein innocent parties were punished for sins they hadn’t committed and some groups were privileged by the governing institutions of society while other groups were not so protected. As soon as the state begins to put its thumbs on the scale to favor some citizens over others, it’s laid the foundation for a society wherein the criminality of favored groups is overlooked while law-abiding members of other groups are targeted unjustly or disproportionately because they are not politically fashionable. That’s why blacks at the street level, and Jews on Wall Street, get away with their crimes, while small White business owners have their businesses and lives destroyed for accounting errors. The court system is just another appendage of Zionism and resolutely protects some while resolutely discriminating against others. Someone needs to have a long talk with young White men and ask them why it is they still want to serve this rotting corpse of a nation?

Whites in the West now, unfortunately, must be in a constant state of hyper-vigilance when traveling outside their own spaces, even within their own nations. Sad and sickening, but true.

Kevin DeAnna (aka Gregory Hood): “White person uses a no-no word against blacks or Muslims? That’s illegal. You’re getting arrested.”

I’d replace the word “Muslims” with the word “Jews.”

A 20-year-old white college kid named Patrick McClintock was recently arrested for saying, “Hey fuck the Jews. Fuck you, David Portnoy. Fuck you. Get out of Starkville” and throwing pennies on the ground, which Jews consider to be an “antisemitic trope.” (LOL)

I haven’t heard of any whites being arrested for insulting Muslims.

McClintock was arrested for “disturbing the peace,” a phony charge considering the fact that he didn’t even yell when he verbally attacked Portnoy. His voice was only raised enough for Portnoy to hear it.

Mississippi allows prosecutors to add a “hate crime enhancement” if the so-called crime is “motivated by racial, religious or ethnic hatred.”

DeAnna/Hood talks about how hard it is for whites to see the anti-white elephant in the room. But he won’t talk about Jews being the main reason for that — not even when he talks about the McClintock-Portnoy kerfuffle. All he’ll do is say, “You’re not allowed to attack the holy classes” and laugh when the person he’s interviewing points out that Portnoy immediately looked at the ground when the pennies were dropped. (LOL)

How can DeAnna/Hood expect normie whites to understand what’s going on when he won’t even talk about Jews in a negative or critical way?

Jewish activists, lawyers, judges, and politicians are at fault here because they use the blacks as a weapon against the white majority to preserve their own Jewish power, but Kevin DeAnna refuses to identify the real problem in the podcast. The courts won’t protect you so long as the Jews control the courts.

Traveling around blacks isn’t your own nation but it is within your own state.

Then we need to rectify this disgusting situation once and for all…And once these kikes were given permission to get Western law degrees really starting in the late 19th century and now niggers and arabs can get them too but everyone questions their competence Western men should have known that the legal system would degrade into a corrupt institution…

If you are just figuring out that the courts won’t protect us, you are way, way behind the power curve.

Dear Editor / Dear Mr. DeAnna, Nov.27, 2025
A Civilized, Scholarly, and Evidence-Based Rebuttal to Kevin DeAnna’s
“The Somali Colonization Program” (Renaissance Radio / UNZ Review, Nov. 24, 2025)

I read with concern your recent “Somali Colonization Program” piece. While I appreciate openness to debate and free expression of ideas, I believe your article rests on sweeping generalizations, harmful stereotypes, and a fundamentally flawed understanding of both Somali history and the diaspora experience. I wish to offer a reasoned rebuttal — not out of animus, but out of duty to truth, justice, and the dignity of human communities.
1. Questionable Generalizations & Moral Responsibility

Your argument hinges on treating “Somalis” — an entire people — as a monolithic group defined by negative traits you ascribe: “like a plague,” “destroying civilization,” “proliferate like locusts.” These are not arguments, but dehumanizing tropes — the very same kind historically used to justify discrimination, exclusion, and violence. In civilized discourse, people must be judged by their individual actions, not by sweeping generalizations about race or origin.
Even if a small fraction of a population commits crimes, it is neither logical nor ethical to condemn the entire group. To do so violates basic principles of fairness and human dignity. A civilized society should judge individuals — not condemn entire ethnicities.

2. Historical and Sociological Reality — Not the “Infection” Narrative
Your article seems to ignore well–documented scholarship on the complex history of Somalia and its diaspora. As many researchers show, the social problems faced by Somalis abroad or at home are not “caused” by some intrinsic defect of the people — but rather by a combination of historical trauma (colonialism, Cold War interventions, state collapse), displacement, forced migration, poverty, disruption of social structures, and systemic barriers in host countries.
journalofinternaldisplacement.org+2 Conciliation Resources+2
For instance, academic studies of Somali diaspora communities note how racism, stereotyping, and discrimination in host societies contribute to cycles of marginalization and identity trauma among diaspora youth.
ARNO+1
In other words: social tensions and challenges are real — but they stem from structural and historical causes, not from any inherent, racial “infection.”

3. The Diaspora: Actors for Reconstruction, Not “Weapons”
Your framing reduces diaspora Somalis to a “problem” — implying they are some kind of weapon or invasion force. But numerous studies highlight the positive contributions of diaspora Somali communities: remittances, investments, skills, and political or social engagement that attempt to help rebuild Somalia or support community well-being.
Heritage Institute+2 Library Asset Server+2
Many diaspora members return (or communicate) precisely because they care about their homeland — they wish to contribute to reconstruction, development, and stability.
Heritage Institute
+1 To brand such people as “locusts” or “plagues” is both factually inaccurate and morally reprehensible.
4. Complexity, Diversity, and Identity — Which Your Thesis Ignores
Somalis, like all peoples, are not undifferentiated: they have clans, sub-clans, diverse regions, histories, cultures, and social experiences. Their diaspora trajectories vary greatly depending on where and why they fled, what opportunities (or lack thereof) they encountered, and how they tried to integrate or maintain identity.
By lumping “all Somalis” into one caricature, your argument denies this diversity and complexity — and by extension denies the individuality, aspirations, and dignity of millions.

5. Dangerous Precedent: From “Opinion” to Exclusion & Bigotry
Finally, such rhetoric can easily cross the line from “opinion” into hate speech — legitimizing exclusion, discrimination, and violence. History teaches us that demonizing whole ethnic groups paves the way for marginalization, social division, and often tragedy. A responsible public commentator, especially in democratic societies valuing pluralism and human rights, should avoid stoking such divisive narratives.
In closing: scholarship, fairness, and moral decency demand that we approach social problems — whether in Somalia, diaspora communities, or host societies — with nuance, compassion, and factual grounding. People are not “plagues”; they are human beings, shaped by history, opportunity, and circumstance. If there are challenges among Somali communities — or any immigrant communities — the remedy lies in addressing root causes (poverty, discrimination, social exclusion, lack of opportunity), not by condemning entire peoples.
I thus urge you — and readers of this platform — to reconsider frameworks that rely on sweeping stereotypes and dehumanizing metaphors. A more honest, responsible, and compassionate discourse is both possible and necessary.
Respectfully,

Prof.Dr. Bischara Ali EGAL. MD, MPH, MSW, PhD(Canada)
Somali-Canadian Medical & Psychological Professional
Practicing in Canada and the United States Since the Early 1980s
Founder & Chief Clinical Officer, Canada Specialized Hospital Inc.
Horn of Africa Center for Strategic & International Studies (HornCSIS)
https://horncsis.com/

Whites in the West now, unfortunately, must be in a constant state of hyper-vigilance when traveling outside their own spaces, even within their own nations. Sad and sickening, but true.

With government moving blacks into nice White areas now with free government housing, it isn’t safe for Whites to walk their own neighborhood in many areas.

Excuses, excuses!

One more thing and how the courts not only won’t protect you, but will also put you in harm’s way, is when federal courts ordered forced school integration with blacks. When Whites did not go to war over what these tyrannical judges did to their children by forcing them to spend their days alongside black ghetto savages, it was a good indication Whites were never going to fight back and they haven’t. It you won’t fight to protect your kids, you don’t deserve your freedom.

If Hollywood has achieved one thing, it’s the normalization of the abnormal, and across the board of human activity. A site, AbleChild, has been formed to fight Hollywood’s introduction of psychiatric drugs for children as the normal treatment of abnormal behavior, when in truth psychiatric drugs are an abnormal, mind-destroying solution to children’s normal developmental behaviors.

It never ends. At first Hollywood movies and then TV were glamorizing drunkenness in movies like “The Thin Man” series. Then in the 1930s came normalizing squat Ashkenazi Jews as the face of science, philosophy, law, medicine, etc., and often complete with fake Austrian accent.

Aside from the humorous ethnic stereotyping, enumerating Hollywood’s replacement of all that’s good and decent about human life with Hollywood’s hatred of it all takes an entire book. It applies to architecture, art, and music, and it applies to education. If one had to sum up their influence in one sentence it might read something like contaminate, infect, transgress, interrogate, condemn, and annihilate all that is good and decent, and do it out of sheer hatred with nothing more than communist hell on earth to put in decency’s place.

New York City is the epitome of citizen disarmament whose residents have been taking it for a very long time…and apparently liking it.

Since the Sullivan Laws were enacted, enabling the most extreme and restrictive limits on the acquisition and uses of firearms, the Constitutional right to defend one’s self and others has been almost totally obliterated.

Once restricted to handguns, the laws have been extended to rifles and shotguns, all of (what were supposed to be “registered”) demanding that they either be confiscated or taken out of NYC.

I’ll bet that those people who voluntarily turned in their weapons added to NYC police officers’ gun collections.

NYC prosecutors relish the thought of prosecuting those who legally defend themselves, even a “rolled up newspaper” is considered to be an illegal “weapon”.

The honest citizen is the easiest person to charge and convict.

If you defend yourself successfully against a criminal without NYC police being involved, you WILL be prosecuted.

Witness Daniel Penny who was being viciously prosecuted for saving fellow subway passengers from mentally ill Jordan Neely who had been harassing and threatening subway passengers for decades. Thankfully he was acquitted of all charges.

The case of the bodega owner, Jose Alba who successfully thwarted a knife attack, his attacker succumbing to his injuries, was under indictment and prosecution for murder until a groundswell of opposition forced the prosecutor to back off on prosecuting him.

The case of Bernie Goetz, the subway rider who thwarted being robbed by dispatching three of his attackers to the “hospital”. Subway crimes dropped dramatically after that act. If Goetz had kept his mouth shut, no one would have been the wiser.

What kind of society prosecutes the victim of a crime?

It happens in NYC all the time.

You see, the approximately 36,000 NYC police officers constitute a powerful lobby and do not want to give up their monopoly on the use of force.
They cannot have their monopoly on the use of force jeopardized by allowing honest citizens to provide for their own self-defense by “taking the law into their own hands”.

Despite having relatives who live in NYC, I will not visit or enter NYC. This also applies to New Jersey.

NYPD used to be the epitome of spit-and-polish, uniformed law enforcement, including its mounted police patrolling the parks and elsewhere serving as a powerful deterrence. Would-be criminals might well visualize themselves being run down by a no-nonsense cop on horseback. Today NYPD is the epitome of time-serving, pension-scamming and disheveled bums working as City Hall’s thugs. Any questions?