@Palmm, @Mr. Crowley

All the people here cackling like it isn't even possible that China might also still be - in reality - controlled by jews would do well to take stock of the situation which they and we are all in, but most of them won't, even if you hold their shaking hands the entire way trying to stimulate them into serious thought & reflection, which is an enormous problem.

That blend of arrogance, fear, ignorance, & possibly above all else straight up "emperor has no clothes" level of delusional denial is a large part of how & why Aryans wound up losing control of their own history, identity, posterity, etc to the jews in the first place and why we have mostly failed to effectively resist them.

Among the minority of Aryans who are ostensibly "jew wise" & Aryan Loyalists, many fall into one of two extreme spectrums regarding just how bad our plight actually is & our prospects (&/or lack thereof) of successfully defeating jews in the grand scheme of things, they are:

Extreme End of Spectrum #1) "110 times iz a comin' jews! based!"

or

#2) "Da jews are omnipotent & invincible! Resistance and even the mere contemplation of it is pointless. Every single 'jew wise Aryan Loyalist' iz secretly working for & controlled by da jews (except for me of course)! The jews had literally everything planned out 50,000 years ago, including the inventions of hollywood & central banking!"

Neither of those are totally true. Yet, most "jew wise Aryan Loyalists" seem to fall in #1, which is arguably worse than the latter (its probably more dangerous to underestimate the jews than overestimate them)

Also, the idea we on the outside looking in can blindly at face value figure out who's a genuine potential ally vs mortal enemy by studying the way the jew system portrays them is one of the most widespread problems we have been facing for a long time now.

Just because jews seem to be attacking & denouncing so & so thing/person doesn't automatically mean so & so is legit & worthy of unconditional support (much less conditional support).

The top jews absolutely know that the "jew wise" men are paying close attention to them & that many of us absolutely despise them in a white hot seething sort of way.

Think about it this way; think of someone you absolutely despise/d in your personal life. Now, think about what your natural automatic reaction is if/when you hear someone you absolutely despise/d sing praises of so & so.

Are you more inclined to think favorably about so & so? or are you more inclined to become deeply suspicious & hostile to so & so?

If someone you despise/d approaches you & tells you that so & so is a wonderful trustworthy person, are you inclined to think favorably of that person & give them your trust? or are you inclined to become very suspicious of them & inclined to dislike them?

Point being, jews understand that "jew wise" individuals/groups are going to automatically be inclined to be very suspicious & hostile towards/about anything big jew is promoting (ie with their mass media). They know that if they convincingly publicly attack, criticize, mock, etc something like christianity, many "jew wise" Aryans will reflexively be inclined to think favorably about it & assume that, "it must be good for me/us since the jews are pumping out articles seemingly kvetching about how 'DANGEROUS & BAD FOR THE JEWS!' christianity is..."

Especially when its "jew wise" Aryans who have already been indoctrinated into whatever strain of christianity concerned - who are already inclined to see christianity favorably - them seeing big jew shouting in media headlines about how "scared & threatened" jews *act* as though they feel about christianity is a decisive clincher.

Naturally, the jews are cackling in the background as such "jew wise" Aryans fall for the same trick over & over & over & over & over again.

Now, I'm not saying that it's not worthwhile & potentially useful to try to monitor & study how jews represent so & so or that its totally meaningless. I'm saying we cannot afford to just take it at face value & buy it hook line & sinker.

We have to take it much further. Is the thing/person that jews are SAYING is so scary & dangerous & terrible also being GENUINELY attacked by jews insofar as their DEEDS?

In other words, is the thing/person TRULY being given the same treatment as National Socialism? Are jews attacking that fiercely with their deeds?

Even then, we must always be willing to revise our assessments if legitimate evidence emerges warranting it.

Anyway, idk if jews still control China or not. Hopefully they do not, but its utterly foolish to exclude even the basic possibility.

Replies: @Palmm

Replies: @Palmm

Replies: @Palmm

Replies: @Palmm

The man hating birthrate killing feminism is a purely jewish invention that was obviously designed to do what it is doing.

It's absurd to compare practicing Christians to loony shitlibs as they are polar opposites.

The key to this woman's downfall was a disease called "jewbrain," recognized by the AMA as a form of brain cancer that eats away at the brain cells until there are none left, leaving the head as empty as a Halloween pumpkin.

I can't get over how the lesbian "wife" was talking shit and telling the agents to go take a lunch ....her ridiculous strutting behavior reminiscent of a loudmouth boxer just before getting into the ring with Mike Tyson.

FAFO.

Replies: @JunkyardDog, @Palmm

Replies: @Palmm

Replies: @Palmm

The following from Cao Yang's comment appeared in guancha.cn yesterday. (Cao Yang is a researcher of China Institute for International Strategic Studies.)

We talk about being lenient with the enemy and taking the opponent seriously; these are tactical principles. But strategically, I think the guiding principle is still the old man's: two words: despise.

Especially with figures like Trump, we must neither underestimate nor overestimate them. Strategically, overestimating our opponents will stifle our strategic thinking, making it difficult for us to break with convention and creatively devise game strategies.

In reality, while Trump may have been a powerful figure for a time, his essence is not that of a true politician or strategist, but rather a political opportunist. His mindset is that of a daring business-man, and his strategies and methods are those of a reality TV show host.

我们讲料敌从宽，讲重视对手，这是战术原则，而在战略上，我看，还是老人家的指导思想，两个字：藐视。

特别对于特朗普之流，我们既不能低估，更不可高估。在战略上，过度高估对手，会束缚我们的战略思维，让我们很难打破常规，创造性地思考博弈对策。

其实，特朗普虽然是一时之枭雄，但是，其本质，不是真正的政治家、战略家，而是一个政治投机客，其思维，是一个大胆的商人，而其策略和手法，就是一个真人秀栏目策划人。
 

As for the two-faced Trump, I think our basic strategy can be summed up in six words: watch him act, wait for his end!
对于口蜜腹剑的老特，我认为，我们的基本战略就六个字：看他作，等他完！
 

Replies: @Palmm, @Miro23

Cuba is only a "rotting sore" because Washington sanctioned them to death ever since 1960 when Fidel Castro came to power and liberated the island from the Mafia that ran the casinos, making billions, while the average Cuban had nothing.

As for Cuba being an "oppressive dictatorship," I don't know whether it is or not. The only creeping oppressive dictatorship I'm seeing these days belongs to the Trump Admin.

Replies: @Palmm

Replies: @doctorb, @Palmm, @littlereddot

Then what, in your opinion, does one do?

Replies: @Palmm

Replies: @NobodyImportant, @tamo, @Palmm, @Cuffy, @Monte Cristo, @Not Important

Replies: @Palmm

YOUR words:

"Cuba has been a rotting sore on the world for decades; most any change would be an improvement."

How do YOU know this? From the mainstream media? Have you ever lived with the citizens of Cuba or even visited there?

What kind of "improvement" do you have in mind? Like all of the "improvements" that have taken place in Haiti over the years?

Just wondering...

Replies: @Palmm

Replies: @Palmm

Replies: @Biff, @TKK, @saoirse, @wlindsaywheeler, @digger john, @Wokechoke, @JunkyardDog, @2stateshmoostate, @Alen Dirtywitz, @N. Joseph Potts, @saoirse, @Felpudinho, @Palmm, @Groyper Respecter 1488, @Just Some JB

As I have now seen more of the evidence I conclude that my preliminary assumption were incorrect.

The spin in the mass media is just as dishonest as in the Floyd case.

She clearly hit the ICE agent, and if he had slipped he would likely be crippled or dead.
She were shot about the same time she hit him.
The ICE agent would have heard her revving the engine, and then hit him.
The ICE agent would have heard the wheels spinning/slipping as she accelerated as hard as possible towards him, if the engine didn't drown it out.
The ICE agent would see the car accelerate towards him, and likely see the rear droop because of the acceleration.

As she were continually turning from the front left toward front right during the acceleration one might speculate that she tried to turn away but this does not change what she did.

Note to self: The mass media is dishonest

Why do the owners and editors want the mass media to lie to us so much?

Replies: @ServesyouallWhite, @Hrw-500, @Palmm

American interventionism? Allow me to correct you—please. Obviously, to me, few people truly understand that Jews were a people before May 14, 1948—without a country. Before that Israel did not exist. Before May, 1948 the land the Jews were stealing was known as British Palestine.

The Ottoman Empire conquered and incorporated the region of Palestine into its dominion in 1516, following its victory over the Mamluk Sultanate at the Battle of Marj Dabiq.

It is said, by the Jews, they have a very ancient history in the land. The Jewish claim to indigeneity is based on a three-thousand—year-old continuous history and the status of the land since ancient times and the focus of Jewish life and yearning.

Until May 14, 1948 Jews were dispersed. And had been for 3000 years.

Zionist/Jews wanted a homeland and even considered other places than Palestine to establish one.

Zionist/Jews were persuaded that they could encourage American intervention in Europe in WWI by propagandizing in the U.S., the necessity of doing so, as “fighting for democracy.” Germany was winning the war! Lord Balfour, in a letter to Rothschild, promised to give Palestine to the Zionist/Jews in return for American intervention.

So, practically, Americans were fighting against the Germans, but in reality Americans were in Germany to ensure that the British won the war—so that the promise to Rothschild by Lord Balfour could be fulfilled. In essence then, for all intents and purposes, it became a Jewish war, though given it was a war promulgated by bankers, it was in fact a Jewish war from the beginning in Europe in 1914.

Surely the present wars are bankers wars! Bankers have the most to gain and the gains for them, are long run gains. Observably their plant and equipment never runs down—does it? Long after tanks, and battleships and aeroplanes are rusting away in useless heaps and the dead are buried—the debts incurred by governments to the Zionist/Bankers are still being paid back dozens of years into the future.

Few know that Great Britain was still paying off its WW II debts to the United States and Canada over 50 years later, with the final payment made on December 29, 2006! In other words the ordinary English taxpayer was paying for a war promulgated by the Zionist/Jewish bankers.

By the time of the final payment in 2006, the initial loans, $3.75 billion (plus a $586 million Lend-Lease loan) to the U.S. and a Canadian loan of $1.19 billion were repaid, the U.K. had paid a total of around $7.5 billion to the U.S. and $2 billion to Canada—accounting for principal plus interest.

The world would be a better place without Zionist/Jewish intervention in WW I and WW II and almost every war you could name for thousands of years. Nations come and go but the Zionist/Jewish bankers thrive by sucking the blood from the citizens for many decades after the end of hostilities.

Israel is proving to be a mill-stone around the necks of the Jews! The Zionist/Jews wanted it, now they have it—“real good!” But make no mistake the citizens of the United States are paying to keep Israel alive—whether they want to or not.

All the blather about God promising the Hebrews, a single bloody thing, is simply blather and bull-shit promulgated to justify murder, slaughter, and thievery. My father was wont to say, “…there is one thing worse than a thief?”

Answering his own question he say, “…a bloody liar.” He was with the British in Palestine during the Arab uprising 1937-1939. He ought to know!

Of course Jews, for the most part do not know their own history, except some specious interpretation of their ancient myths. Jews are nothing but a cult rampant. They are nothing but psychopathic trouble-makers with an extensive and exclusive vocabulary they never stop using to betray the Goyim.

The average American Goy, tragically, identifies with the Zionist/Jew. Why?

Replies: @Palmm

Replies: @werpor

Spiteful mystery meat mutant detected.
 

is only the beginning of the great global European assertion of sovereignty. Prepare yourself.
 

Replies: @Palmm

All of you fed goon cheerleaders will have shit on your face when Trumpenstein lets most of these illegal muds back in 'legally'. I can just hear the coping: "Someboddy has got to do the work or our economee will go under". Muh capitalism at work.
Meanwhile, the pajeets and the Chi-coms are given carte blanche to waltz right in and you're being told that they are valued more than lazy "Heritage Merkans". Don't hold your bad breath waiting for good goy Donnie to give them the boot.
Then the commie shitlibs take over, again, open up the floodgates, and use those same fed goons to shoot your asses for domestic terrorism/white racism. That's if you hacks can muster the courage to take to the streets!

Replies: @Palmm

Replies: @Palmm

Replies: @2stateshmoostate, @Palmm

Lol

No one is illegal on stolen land.
You're an example.

Replies: @Palmm

Jews are 100% to blame.

Muslims didn't become a problem until after Jews ordered the United States to destroy seven Muslim countries in the Middle East, followed by mass migration of Muslims to the United States and western Europe.

Replies: @John Johnson, @Palmm

a “lawyer” who banks on the fantasy that the US is not in a cold civil war.
 

not only that, but I'm convinced he's ideologically fanatical about the Great Replacement, and that it can't happen fast enough.

Even as he doesn't put it quite like that, because as you've noticed, he's careful to couch his anti-white fervor in oblique, obfuscatory language, in between banal insults.

he *says* he approves of the deportations. "There’s nothing wrong with it at all, but there’s also a proper way to go about doing it," and forgive me, but I suspect that the 'proper' way to go about it, from muh muh's perspective, is to not do it at all.

Now, as you can see, I did just infer what I consider to be muh muh's deeply held convictions, but as he'll never say so out loud, how else can we crystalize his motivating ethos, other than by ciphering from his relentless agenda-driven comments?

But I enjoy our conversations, even as he relentlessly and shamelessly sets up straw men, ["You insinuate that she was boiling with rage"], and then knocks them down, thinking he's accomplished some victory, or other, but then I just point out his antics, and so it goes over and over and over...

My hope is that for those who're not ideologically blinkered, they'll consider the meat and potatoes of the debate, and make up their own minds, whether or not 8 billion people are all de-facto American citizens, with the right to squat here, and get their gibs, and entitled to all the Constitutional protections that American citizens have - (which is effectively what these stupendously idiotic protesters are all insisting).

For those challenged people, who judge every issue based on their feelings, then these debates are not for them. Their "minds" are already made up. But for those who think, (which I suspect TUR has more than its share), perhaps there's merit to our conversations.

Nevertheless, I consider it fun, for the most part.

{fwiw, I also generally agree with muh muh vis-a-vis the plight of the Palestinians, and a few other issues.}

Replies: @Palmm, @muh muh

I wouldn't engage, you are talking to a "lawyer" who banks on the fantasy that the US is not in a cold civil war.

Replies: @muh muh, @Rurik

[concession that Good received conflicting orders duly noted]
 

Link to it, already.
 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZrUMVtrCK_Y

You insinuate that she was boiling with rage
 

FWIW, you have zero evidence that Good was protecting any of the people in your linked tweet, and even if she was, you have no evidence that she knew anything about their offenses.
 

You need to think that Good was as angry as you because if you don’t, you realize you’re standing all alone in your rage.
 

would you, muh muh, be just as vehement in demanding prosecution for the protester, having committed murder?
 

Sure, why not?
 

Lord, you make yourself look ridiculous with your irremediable habit of insinuation.
 

Yes, they're going to do everything in their bag of tricks to demonize ICE, and the deportations, as Brown Shirts on the verge of gas chambers. We all expected that, and we expected the hysterical antics of the armies of woke. Who, I don't mind saying, are making themselves a laughing stock.

'All 8 billion people on the planet have more right to be here than the ICE racists!'

Is what these asshats believe, and the media and assorted bad actors are egging them on, because just like with Europe, and I bring up Ireland, they all want all white nations to roll over into oblivion.

And, (sorry to say, muh muh), but I just don't think that's going to happen, at the end of the day.

Replies: @Palmm, @muh muh

It's just not true, the real tax rates, real government spending, were much lower in the 1950s.
In fact, I would agree with you "nominally" to go back to 1950's relevant economic policy. It's just the characterization is a shitlib one I believed for years, and yes Reagan was part of it.

https://usgovernmentspending.com/spending_chart_1900_2029USd_27s2li011lcny_F0t

Real total gov. per capita spending in year 2017 constant dollars.
1953 $5,129
2026 $26,681

Real government spending has increased 5x.

2026 is understated due to year 2017 constant dollars.

Replies: @Franz

No I am a White Nationalist who believes Socialism WORKS in a Nation that is ALL WHITE ONLY as Hitler PROVED that in Germany. (((Communism/Judaism))), I am an admirer of Hitler and I despise the white traitor trash creaky 70 year old ex hippies, fat sloppy or fat/skinny millennials, with their nigra and beaner pets who go up against ICE, law enforcement ( hey, I don’t like all cops either), etc. hate white traitor trash worse than kikes, nigras, cholos ( regular beaners are tolerable but they need to go South.) Calling a White Nationalist a “communist sympathizer?” Wow, you got me there for sure. ROTFLMMFWAO. Trumpstein was put in office to bring chaos, although I do approve him exporting non white rapists, chomos, swindlers, useless freeloaders, but is this more show than go… No White Nationalist worth a shit has any love for Trumpstein the self described King Of The Jews. Trump has disdain for working class Whites and kneels to World Kikery. “Communist Sympathizer?” LMAO

Cue: Born On The Bayou by CCR

Epstein, Donald

Replies: @Palmm, @Cornhole

it (your linked video) shows that she struck the guy
 

In fact, it shows no such thing.
 

In truth, you have no evidence what Good was thinking, yet you need to believe she was simmering with hostility at Ross
 

That’s right. ‘Fucking bitch’, he calls her, no more a few seconds after murdering her.
 

Buuut… You’ve admitted it yourself: ‘This issue has more to do with people’s perspectives and feelings, than with actual law.’
 

You see, Rurik… That’s what happens when you cede your sense of fair play to political partisanship.
 

Replies: @muh muh, @Palmm

it (your linked video) shows that she struck the guy
 

In fact, it shows no such thing.
 

In truth, you have no evidence what Good was thinking, yet you need to believe she was simmering with hostility at Ross
 

That’s right. ‘Fucking bitch’, he calls her, no more a few seconds after murdering her.
 

Buuut… You’ve admitted it yourself: ‘This issue has more to do with people’s perspectives and feelings, than with actual law.’
 

You see, Rurik… That’s what happens when you cede your sense of fair play to political partisanship.
 

Replies: @muh muh, @Palmm

Right, this is the “Q tard” argument. Generally speaking, the argument is that the “Clowns” of the CIA are their own self serving entity. Yeah, probably, why not. It makes some sense when “the US progressives” have some relations with “left wing populist” Latin American leaders.
 

But it is not longer the Cold War, and many former soviet aligned countries dropped their “secular ideology” and brought back more traditional Catholic symbols and laws.
 

Replies: @Palmm

“Restraint” is a loaded term
 

There's a perversity about all this ICE violence that troubles me. Heritage Americans and their political opposites are unfortunately in the habit of operating at the very edges of the law, seemingly enjoying the Wild Wild West aspect of it all. Nothing gets the blood running, and eyeballs to screens, and keyboards tap-tap-tapping than an unlawful shooting. It's quite perverse some of the arguments used to justify them. To my mind, any departure from the center of the codes of conduct should be scrutinized, not just the shoot-em-ups at the edges that give the gunbois their jollies.

Replies: @Palmm

Replies: @obwandiyag, @Christoph88, @Brazilian Brainrot, @Che Guava, @Madbadger, @anon, @Same old same old, @Palmm

Is there anything wrong at all, with rounding up, and deporting people who are here illegally?
 

Replies: @Palmm

There's a lot to your thoughtful comment that I'd like to respond to, but for the moment, let me just ask you..

Is there anything wrong at all, with rounding up, and deporting people who are here illegally?

Replies: @Palmm, @Jackabond

Replies: @Verymuchalive, @Palmm, @Eustace Tilley (not)

Replies: @Palmm

Ted, in some respects, you're only half-right. Some very important checks aren't dead.

The checks from campaign donors are bigger and more important than ever:

Citizens United v. FEC

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC

The anarcho-tyranny that prevails in America condemns ordinary people to the worst of both worlds:

Unfettered influence-peddling "free speech" for members of the oligarchy, and increasingly draconian limits on genuine free speech for everyone else.

Replies: @Palmm

Replies: @Palmm

When WW2 ended, the United States desperately needed an "enemy" to justify its huge military budgets, with Russia as the only other surviving nation becoming the enemy.

It's been that way ever since, with additional enemies created and discarded as needed, including political and philosophical movements and ideas.

Replies: @Anonymous, @Cow dog, @Mr. Crowley, @Palmm, @Palmm, @Anymike

Yes, that is a more evolved way of looking at it. But not everyone can/is ready to relate to that point of view.

The problem is to use the world "equal" without qualifying it....This implies that everyone is equal in both worth, and ability.

Perhaps the better definition to avoid confusion is All men are of equal worth.

It is plainly clear that not All men are of equal ability.

Then there is also the time aspect. Someone might be highly competent as an 40 year old. But when he was 12 years old was he equally competent? Or when he reaches 90 years old?

---------------------------

For me, what is critical is our next decision after we realise that All Men are of equal Worth, but not Ability....

Shall the strong bully the weak?
Shall the smart take advantage of the dull?
Shall the stupid assume he is smart and do himself no end of harm?
Shall the child assume he knows more than his parents and refuse their guidance?

I think Confucius offered us his viewpoint 2500 years ago, already.

Replies: @Palmm

When WW2 ended, the United States desperately needed an "enemy" to justify its huge military budgets, with Russia as the only other surviving nation becoming the enemy.

It's been that way ever since, with additional enemies created and discarded as needed, including political and philosophical movements and ideas.

Replies: @Anonymous, @Cow dog, @Mr. Crowley, @Palmm, @Palmm, @Anymike

There is one hell of a difference between beting a citizen of the USA and being an American.

 

Replies: @Palmm

It begs the question, why hasn’t the US always been this way?
 

In my view, your ancient Athenians warned us about it more than 2000 years ago. They knew that Democracy exerts a pressure on politicians to turn to more and more demagoguery.

They knew that contrary to populist mantras, men are NOT created equal. Some men are more able to select their rulers than others. For democracy to work, those empowered to vote, must be capable of critical thought, discipline to study the issues at hand, and the wisdom to vote for the good of society as a whole, rather than for selfish gain.

That is why your Founding Fathers formulated the original eligible electorate in the USA to be a fraction of the population, those they judged were capable and invested to vote for the good of society as a whole. Only land-owning men were given the heavy responsibility of the vote. Over time, demagogic pressures caused the right to vote to be spread wider and wider into the general population. Today any fool over 18 with a heartbeat is given the vote. The wider population does not care about suffering short term pain for long term gain.

They will elect politicians that will whisper sweet things into their ears, rather than telling them "We have gone off course, we will need to suffer hardship for the next 10 years before our children will see a better day". Such a politician will never gain office with today's voting electorate.

Replies: @xcd, @Palmm

Replies: @Palmm

I'm looking at you, IRAN. It was bad enough to allow Iranian Jews and Jews who escaped from liberated Afghanistan, to operate unhindered and carry out the murder of your top military leaders and scientists.
It was bad enough that your air force wasn't already on high alert, based on hard warnings from Israel and Washington.
It was bad enough that none of Iran's jets were outfitted for CAP missions and patrolling in anticipation of such a bombing.
It was bad enough that the IRAAF had no contingency plans on how to scramble and repel the IDF bombings.
Certainly it was a double disgrace that the U.S. B-2's did their dirty work for the Jews while the global media followed them all the way in! And yet, Iran's air power, knowing what the world already knew about the impending attack, hid in their hangars.

As long as Iran's air force could fly and fight, it was a crime to stay on the ground. Win or lose, they could've shown the kind of bravery and courage that the world is desperate to witness. The kind of fighting spirit that would cause much of the world to dump the U.S. and break all of our sanctions to support Iran. Iran spent the past 30 years building self-sufficiency, training up an entire generation of skilled engineers and technicians, making spare parts, making copies of the AIM-54 Phoenix missile, and other developments to ensure they had the means to fight back. All of that was wasted while the U.S. and Israel went in unopposed.

And that same cowardice hinders Iran from organizing what few allies it can muster and go in to rescue the people of Gaza. Shame on you Iran. The blood of Palestine is on your hands now.

Replies: @Palmm

Jews are the ultimate mongrelized mutt. Part Near Eastern, part Turk, part Oriental, part Black African, part European, and more.

You couldn't get more mongrelized than the Jew.

Yet, here you are ranting about Americans being mongrels. And the funny thing is, whatever mongrelization that has gone on, the Jews have been there pushing it behind the curtain all along.

You need to return to your home in MENA and live under Muslim rule.

Replies: @Palmm

Why would any politician build a highspeed rail network if such an undertaking will take 2 decades? The cost will be upfront and the benefits only come much later.
 

Replies: @Plebney, @kiwk, @mulga mumblebrain, @Paul Greenwood, @True Blue, @Joe Levantine, @Alden, @Palmm, @RRRic

Most of it is military. They just use creative accounting to hide the fact.

Look up "graft."

Replies: @Palmm

"The Romans issued a wanted poster for Jesus, which still survives, describing him as short (about four foot six), bald-headed, and hump-backed." --Colin Wilson; Atlantis & the Kingdom of the Neanderthals

Thus ending the idiocy/ignorance that rabbi Jesus was 'fabricated by the Romans', but proving vis a vis his physical description, that Christianity is the religion of the Chandala--the deformed, the misfit, the mongrel, the unfit--& was formulated/created to appeal to the weak, malformed, stupid & insane.

The Jewish contemporaries of Jesus at first misunderstood his mission or strategy, desiring a 'Messiah' who would directly overthrow Rome via force, violence & hate--whereas Jesus astutely recognized that would end in obvious defeat due to the material superiority of the Roman military--thus he & his Hebrew disciples conceived of a more intelligent, subtler, devious plot to first conquer the minds of the white race & the Roman Empire over time via the seductive idea/weapon of 'love'. Once their minds were subdued to the degenerate cosmopolitan 'creed of compassion'--then their nations would naturally follow.

A.A.

Replies: @Felpudinho, @Franz, @Anymike, @James J. O'Meara, @Giventofly79, @Palmm

I heard that the CCP pays Taiwanese online opinionators (also known as online trash) to first bash Chinkland and then, once they get some anti-Chinkland creds, slowly turn into Chinkland supporters.

Makes them look more "natural" when they start spouting about Chinkland being a "democracy" or "No 1" or some similar trash. LOL!!!!

Replies: @littlereddot, @Palmm

Then they embraced communism with Chavez, add US sanctions, and they were done
 

In order to find out, we must look at the performance of Communist states that did not have US sanctions or other economic restrictions placed on it.

Is there such an example?

China from 1980 onwards perhaps?

Replies: @Palmm

Increased debt (bank loans) since 2000... very roughly... but conservatively...

1) U.S. national debt was $6T in 2001 when Bush took office. Since then, it has increased by over $30T.
2) Corporate debt (to fund mergers/acquisitions)... $9T.
3) Real estate debt... $9T.
4) Consumer debt... $3T.
5) Fed asset purchases... $9T
6) Many other things.

A 25-year debt increase of 30+9+9+3+9 = $60T

Assuming an average of 300M Americans... that's $60T/300M = $200K per American ($8K/yr)

Assuming four Americans per household... that's $800K per American family ($32K/yr)

The increased national debt (which many analysts claim is mostly due to increased homeland security spending) of $30T is equivalent to $400K per American household, enough for EVERY American family to have completely purchased a BIG fancy house... or built thousands of miles of highspeed railroads to compete with China's 35K miles... in just the past 25 years.

In "English"... if the old-fashioned "interest rates" mechanism had not been "hidden" using "derivative contracts" (i.e. insurance contracts to hedge/wager on interest rate fluctuation "risk"... which were totally illegal before the Clinton administration... i.e. before the USSR disappeared and the U.S. decided to force a global dollar monetary system)... this HUGE amount of money/debt creation would NOT have been possible/allowed/legal.

And BTW... as everyone knows... in these past 25 years... the wealth of the global 5% Managerial Class has dramatically increased... while the wealth of the global 95% working class has dramatically decreased (particularly in the West). Basic logic... I believe... suggests that the legalization of derivatives (deregulation of insurance contracts) had MUCH to do with this 'change' (ah yes... "change"... which leads to the even BIGGER story... Obama's Bailouts... tens of $trillions more).

In just 25 years... $30T increased U.S. debt... $400K ($16K/yr)... per American family of four! For increased homeland security? If we had built a continental highspeed rail network the return on investment would have been HUGE... AND it would easily have repaid all the debt. Why doesn't ANYONE care to talk about this... I can't find a single person here in Texas that will talk about this stuff... or anything else. Why????

Replies: @Palmm, @Rev. Spooner, @Gvaltar, @SimplePseudonymicHandle

Replies: @Pythas, @Gore 2004, @Hulkamania, @Druid, @Richard B, @Palmm

 
https://static.timesofisrael.com/blogs/uploads/2020/05/Map-of-the-partition-of-Trans-Jordan.jpg
 

Palestinian Jews receiving only 23% of the land was less than fair, but it was potentially workable.

The key problem was launched in the 1940's when the newly formed UN overthrew settled international law. Less than ¼ of the land for Palestinian Jews was too much. So, the UN illegally attempted to steal more. Nothing has been the same since then. Once Islam was rewarded with Jewish land, they have attempted to repeat this feat, stealing more and more.

There is a path forward. Return to the original 2 state solution. Muslims in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza become legally & officially Jordanian. They receive Jordanian documentation. They have the right to travel to Jordan. And, so on.

• Those who place 1st priority on the fates of Muslim women & children trapped on the battlefield will take up this opportunity.

• Those who place 1st priority on violence, such as the October 7 Genocide Attack will refuse. They do not care about Muslim women & children at risk.

Sadly, Muslim colonists have been indoctrinated to choose violence. The original 2 state solution could still work, but Islamists will not give international law a chance... Even after 70 years of failed efforts at obviously unworkable & illegal UN proposals.

PEACE 😇

Replies: @anonymous, @meamjojo, @ProsecuteGenocide, @Passing by, @Prudentia, @Matt Lazarus, @Prudentia, @Druid, @Alen Dirtywitz, @Palmm, @Paul Greenwood

I just find it odd that the mainstream press, all of the sudden, is pro market on tariffs.
 

Replies: @Achmed E. Newman, @Palmm

I just find it odd that the mainstream press, all of the sudden, is pro market on tariffs.
These are the same people that will support, or be neutral, on every other tax. My suspicion is they "horse-trade" on positions, to get to a planned outcome.
I would argue, libertarians need to distinguish government spending that is income transfer, and the rest. The USAID revelations show there is no "waste," only money laundering.

But yes, the argument is unilateral free trade is a net benefit to the US. That implies countries with a trade surplus with the US don't know what they are doing.

Replies: @HT, @Truth Vigilante

Right, it is always better to describe parties involved, rather than the "legal entity." So, Business taxes are paid by employees, shareholders, and consumers. The tax share I don't now, but obviously, those are the three parties who must pay.

It's a fundamental disagreement: Is "targeted Mercantilism," politically preferable? President Trump and China/Chairman Xi agree. Free trade causes people to move around - just look at the US states. So this is an issue beyond economic efficiency.

Replies: @V. K. Ovelund

Is “targeted Mercantilism,” politically preferable?
 

Extreme mercantilism (100-percent tariffs and the like) would be unwise, but only moderate mercantilism is on offer in the United States at the moment, and moderate mercantilism is just what I want.

I notice that free traders keep trying to sell me free trade based on putative benefits I do not value. The free traders offer me (1) inexpensive foreign-made consumer goods, (2) humiliation of U.S. organized labor, (3) jobs supplying things foreigners demand, (4) interdependency between the United States and foreign countries, (5) a theoretical, almost imperceptible, Heckscher-Ohlin rise in U.S. GDP due to comparative advantage, and (6) the chance to sneer at my fellow citizens for failing to understand Ricardian trade theory as well as I do. I want none of these things, I don't value them, I want other things, and I am not the only one that thinks this way.

Replies: @Truth Vigilante, @Palmm

Contrary to popular belief, foreign businesses do not pay tariffs.
 

Replies: @Palmm, @Truth Vigilante

So when the ZOG elders say ‘write positive things about Chumps tariffs’, they dutifully comply.
 

Replies: @Mark G.

"No, I mean the mainstream press is AGAINST tariffs"

I saw Democrat Joy Reid on MSNBC a while back come out against tariffs and I thought to myself, "she is just against them because Trump is for them".

The Democrats are returning to their roots. The Southern Democrats seceded from the Union at least partly because they did not like the high tariffs the Republicans supported. If Jefferson Davis was alive today, he and his fellow Democrat Joy Reid would be comrades on the same side against the Republicans.

Replies: @Palmm

I just find it odd that the mainstream press, all of the sudden, is pro market on tariffs.
 

Replies: @Palmm, @Jokem, @Harold Smith

Replies: @Palmm

I am a fan of Mearsheimer, but like each of us, he has his weaknesses.

Here is what I assert is the most important passage in this Hua Bin piece:

Regarding his analysis about US Israel relationship, I contend they are also superficial and fail to probe into the true depth of Israeli/Zionist Jewish control over US politics, foreign policy, economics, finance, media, academia, and religion.

His attribution of Israeli influence on US is so narrowly focused on the power of the Israeli lobby that one must wonder whether Professor Mearsheimer actually serves as controlled opposition to ringfence the debate over Jewish power in the US.

 

Replies: @Eric135, @Kali El, @Palmm

Professor Mearsheimer seems totally unaware that China has three times total industrial capacity than the US, has achieved technological parity and lead in most critical future technologies including AI and military tech, and is much better prepared for a kinetic war in the western Pacific near Chinese shores.
 

Professor Mearsheimer suffers the same intellectual deficiency as the neocon hawks in the US establishment.
 

Moreover, I contend Professor Mearsheimer is a naïve and poorly informed geo-strategist, not in the same league as Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinki
 

Replies: @Anonymous534, @Palmm