You really showed me. I guess I’ll be going to bed now lol

Bad luck happens. It’s not the mysterious work and ways of some darwinian selection god.

Oh no, did I blaspheme your Darwinian faith?

And your response never matured into an actual argument lol

Christianity, Judaism, Islam… different peas, same pod.

Hence, why I said it was a parental responsibility to protect their children, not some Darwinian roulette wheel. I think you forgot your reading and comprehension skills. It’s ok, you can always read it again.

One of those responses that, in the main, reinforce the author’s points…

And how’s that, genius?

weaker or less-healthy children are more prone to illness, disease, violent death, and fatal injury, and this was nature’s way of removing humans with less-than-optimal genes from the gene pool, leaving the strongest and healthiest to reproduce.

Lol no, preventing injury and violent death in children is a parental responsibility, not some Darwinian “trait” you inherit, dummy.

Lol a coomer justifying his dirty habit.

You’re confusing fratenizing with homosexuality lol. Is there something more you want to, um… get out?

We can have a Darwinian struggle and the survival of the fittest. I have little to no doubt who would come out on top.

Probably jews

And apart from your self-righteous indignation, where did I lie?

Try to keep your emotions under control or you’ll just look like a hysterical clown.

Yeah? What part?

Believe what best accomodates you emotionally. That’s what really matters.

White nationalists have such strong opinions on women and what they should do. Yet hilariously, none of them appear to actually interact with women. Instead, they have all these detailed and elabotately academic theories about females that all bear that trademark geeky cringe of someone who has very little irl experience with the opposite sex. “Muh red pill! Muh black pill! Look! Statistics, numbers, credentials, and Jedi mind tricks!”

Consider hypergamy (and btw LOL!) This is one of those silly things only dorks believe. When there’s no real men around, only then do women pull out the measuring tape. But an actual man can easily bypass such nonsense. Metrics are for cucks. Masculinity is not performative, not even for a female audience. It’s funny how hypergamy suddenly doesn’t apply when “immigrants welcome”. Yet white men think that old treadmill holds the key to their sexual salvation hahahahaha.

I just love that scene in Rocky 3 where Clubber Lang aggressively propositios Rocky’s wife in front of him. It’s hilariously allegorical to muh Western civilization. You got Rocky all nicely dressed, comfortable, respectable and looking like a total corporate hack. Above him muh statue of accomplishments. But Rocky has let success soften him. Suddenly Mr T flanks him with “Hey Woman! Hey Woman!” and everyone just knows Adrian was thinking about it. It’s a running joke in the comments coz it’s true. And all the WN can do is lash out: muh civilization, muh high trust society, muh IQ (the WN version of “muh dik”). But none of that makes up for not being a real man. And judging by the self-improvement meme, white men are not about to figure out anytime soon what masculinity is. They honestly believe masculinity is getting up at 4 am, taking cold showers, lifting weights, and using tools. Just LOL!

I feel zero sympathy. But consider just this plain fact. It is FAR easier to approach and flirt with a complete stranger white woman in broad daylight than it is to befriend a white man in your social vicinity. White men are traitors to each other. That is why they can’t be real men. And white women sense such weakness from miles away.

No, I’m not gay, but is that really your argument? Lol. You have a feminine psychology.

Who let the white nationalists out of the basement?

This article’s a real drag. It reads like pulpit nagging. I really have to wonder how many of these academic losers actually enter the social field and interact. Zero.

I like all this diversity. It’s so like, Darwinian, in a very Battle Royale sense. Don’t forget, it was specifically Northern Europeans who once upon a time loved to lecture the world on Social Darwinism and survival of the fittest. Now the struggle has transformed, the tables have turned, and suddenly you cry foul? Lol, this is the bed you made. Sleep in it and don’t be racist, like ever lol

I blame white men for not sticking together. Such defective communal instincts among white men is an inexcusable and very threatening weakness that tbey broadcast far and wide. Pretty much any other race/demographic/subculture does a much better job at friendship than white men. White men view each other strictly according to utility at best, and competition at worst. If you have no apparent utility to them, you’re just in the way. The idea of cooperation or the amplified power of sticking together never enters their dodo-bird brains. They subscribe a lot to social darwinism, yet ironically it’s their stubborn individualism that singles them out as unfit for social competiviness and survival in our age of multiculturalism. It’s quite pathetic to behold. Even Hitler himself said in Mein Kampf that such a pathetic situation is not an injustice, but a restoration of justice. If you can’t hold someone’s back, you do not deserve safety. It’s like in Gladiator’s first colesseum fight, the protagonist warns his fellow captives that if they don’t stick together, they will die. And yet some dumbass is wandering outside the pack getting picked off by the chariot archers. That’s the white man right now. And they totally deserve it. There’s nothing more disgusting than betrayal and cowardice in this world, not even an Indian slum.

Women have an astounding inability to recognize danger. At times I’ve even wondered if in some of these situations women were demonstrating unusual courage. But they’re not because if you’re not aware of the danger, it doesn’t count as courage. It’s just stupidity. And western women are particularly stupid on this regard.

What this proves is that evolution is a pseudo-scientific theory, and obviously you’re unable to justify it, let alone defend it from scrutiny.

You believe it because other allegedly smart people believe it. Science is a popularity contest to you, making you a classic midwit NPC.

There’s nothing more to discuss.

But please keep being funny. It’s entertaining watching a dumb boomer unravel under basic scrutiny. Your generation is unaccustomed to accountability.

Dat’s still no argument.
I recall you asked me what it would take to convince me of Darwinian evolution. In so doing, you took up responsibility of proving it. So far, you’re doing a very poor job of that. In fact, I even had to correct your ignorantly foolish definition of evolution. You’re not very smart since going from authority fallacies to ad hominems. Is that really your “argument”, doctor? Lmfao, even a 5 yo makes better arguments.

This article was one of the funniest things I’ve read in a long time.

Corinne is not the first, nor the last white woman to think like this. A lot of them seem to genuinely despise the civilization their white men afford them. They also despise white men. But we must never forget just how important toilet paper is to the white woman! We all learned that during the great coof.

You should learn how to properly blockquote your replies, boomer lol.

Why you talking about astronomy? We haven’t even gotten past evolution yet. Since it can’t be independently duplicated, it’s not science. But you insist on knowing better, but you’re yet to convince me.

Keep trying.

This is Marcos fault as he was a typical Eurocuck , a tradition which goes back thousands of years in Europe amongst celts and franks . Muslims noted the open touching and intimacy that Frankish husbands allowed their wives with other men , even reporting that a Frank came upon another Frank sleeping in the bed with his wife and how he had no problem with it . There was no honor or revenge or anything . The truth is Europeans prior to Christianity were just as sexual as the savage Africans . They are just upset that Africans seem to have outsavaged them .

LOL yes, you’re a legend! You’ve “disproved” Darwin’s theory through the simple expedient of asserting nothing is a scientific fact unless it can be “duplicated”.

What’s more disconcerting here is your inability to prove Darwinian evolution. Rather, you ignore my points, change the subject, then laugh like an emotionally immature pseudo-intellectual. Meanwhile, I’m still unconvinced. Yet it was, funnily enough, you who asked me what it would take to convince me. Is this really your idea of “convincing”, Dr? Authority fallacies wrapped in the condescending ridicule of someone with no actual arguments?

I’ll keep waiting…

Keep telling yourself that. Not only did you get the definition of evolution wrong, but you still haven’t refuted my points disproving it. Rather, you changed the subject. Try again, I’ll wait.

It’s funny how the guy talking about unsupported opinions is ignoring my argument and deflecting by changing the subject. Very scientific.

Former White Man: “Evolution is trans-specieism.”

No. Evolution by natural selection means that when environmental conditions change in nature, some genetic combinations will be favored in the struggle for survival over others. That that happens is pretty easy to show.

There’s no contradiction here, rather the problem is you’re not concluding the logic. The theory of evolution explicitly states that these changes are supposed to cause one species to transform into another. Now prove it.

That’s an absurd standard of proof. Since by the terms of the theory itself such a transformation would take millions of years under natural conditions, it can’t be done in a laboratory, nor within a human lifetime. And even if it could, then you could still object “Yes, it can be done under artificial conditions in a laboratory, but you haven’t proved it occurs in nature!”

Oh ok, so therefore evolution is not scientific because it cannot be duplicated. Yet you insist it’s true? That’s called faith, not science. Remember, scientists are always smugly congratulating themselves on the peer review process which requires independent duplication. Can’t do this? Then it’s not a scientific fact. Just like continental drift, and big bang are not scientific facts. Rather, these things are beliefs, and belief requires faith.

Yet this theory is, afaik, universally accepted as scientific.

Universally accepted? What a very peculiar thing for a scientist to say, because science isn’t supposed to be a popularity contest. It’s supposed to be about facts that can be duplicated by others. At this point, even Angus MacGyver is more scientific than you and your faith in evolution, continental drift, and big bang theories.

I’d respect the science people a lot more if they just candidly admitted that a lot of the things they believe are not facts, but educated guesses requiring a touch of religious-like faith to bridge. And that’s fine with me, you are allowed to make educated guesses and have lines of best fit. Just don’t go around pretending these things are irrefutable facts that others have to believe in too.

Evolution is trans-specieism.
And science is something you can duplicate.

Show me an example of a scientist who has, (through selective breeding and mutation), transformed one species into another.

Perhaps a mouse into a fox?

It’s like believing by selecting the right stuff off a Mcdonald’s menu, you can eventually “evolve” a Big Mac into a high tea sandwich stand.

Moths changing color doesn’t prove evolution anymore than getting a pink iPhone proves iPhones spontaneously and randomly evolved out of phone booths.

It’s a silly argument, and always was.

Christians have such basic bitch intellects…
>if you don’t eat my vomit soup you’ll have to eat a turd sandwich! BOOM! There, I showed you.
Lmfao!
When not enslaved to yahwehism and his genocidal real estate contracts, White people do things like Greco-Roman culture, Rennaissance, Catharism, Vedism, and National Socialism, all stuff infinitely better than human sacrifice blood magic cults.

Christianity gives me such a headache. Just try carefully and honestly reading the Bible and it will painfully confuse you. Almost like its author of confusion deliberately wanted. There is actually no such thing as true Christianity because the contradictions of the Bible automatically amplify innumerable variations of it.

It’s like the spiritual version of a Saw movie, but with a low budget. It’s a real choose-your-own-adventure mine field Hunger Games style battle royale where one little innocent mistake will take you to hell, FOREVER! And btw, you must kill anyone who believes it differently coz you really don’t want any reminders of those pesky, but lethal contradictions. Yes, in this Monty Hall style game show, Satan is the goat behind that door, and instead of winning a new car you get to sing halleleujahs to yahweh for the rest of eternity. Sound great? But at least it’s not eternal hell torture.

This is just another one of those games you win by not playing.

I don’t have a problem with “conspiracy theories”, no matter how absurd they may appear, because even then, they usually provide more believable explanations than the mainstream conventional narratives.

The “covid” hysteria psyop and its attendant trauma-based propaganda provided ample proof of this. Virtually any conspiracy theory around “covid” far out-paces the “trust the science” narrative in terms of explaining power.

I can’t help but notice that people who hate the idea of “conspiracy theories” always serm to speak down to people from a position of smug, condescending elitism that far too often leans on authority fallacies rather than any sort of investigative exploration of these “conspiracy theories”. Indeed the critics of “conspiracy theories” very rarely have any sort of serious awareness of the ideas they’re critcizing. Almost always they strawman these matters only into the most cartoonishly unrecognizable caricatures that instantly betrays their foolishly wilful ignorance.

These critics are rarely deep thinkers, and they certainly don’t have any alternative explanations of their own apart from trying to shame and tone-police you back into believing “the science(TM)”.

But I think conspiracy theories are an excellent use of free speech and public scrutiny. Their existence alone proves our elites have totally failed at giving plausible explanations for things. And if conspiracy theories were all lies, there would be absolutely no need to censor them because they’d be easily disproven.

I think the idea that Jewish-owned MSM is a reliable source of accurate and truthful information is the ultimate “conspiracy theory”. I think I’d rather listen to the fat slob hiding in his basement from chemtrails. It’s ok, I can make up my own mind.