Foolish not to vote.
If voters or voting could change anything they’d have found a way to stop voting it long ago.
The White race doomed itself when it started loading African slaves onto ships and bringing them to the New World
Long story short, and this is kind of old news, but White Europeans didn’t orchestrate the African slave trade, but the jew controlled media would never tell you who actually did. The US National Archives shows approximately 80% of the slaves ships not only had Hebrew Names but jew Owners. I wonder if that’s why they ended up changing their God-Given names to Mammon; Goldberg, Silverman, Diamond, Shekels, Redstone, Pearl, Goldston, Silverstein, Perl, Dimon, etc.. And 70% of them owned slaves, compared to less than 2% of Whites. But they control the media, academia, and the minds of the masses, so the brainwashed sheep themselves will hate you for speaking the “antisemitic” TRUTH.
Just like Nazism: one white group is SUPERIOR and all other whites are inferior and deserving of utter destruction.
Hitler, never considered Germans the “Master Race” and never referred to them as such. That accusation was nothing more than jewish smear. National Socialism wasn’t about Germans being superior to other ethnic groups, it was the belief that ethnic Germans working together with their own people in their own country, not inhibited by other ethnic or racial groups, could better themselves, at a much faster rate and someday become a master race. Hitler did not believe in the destruction of other peoples. WW2 was not his creation or desire, but that of the ALL-LIES, and the alleged Holocau$t™ was a total fabrication. It was the German people who were “battered”, by an alien group who wanted to own and control Germany, and the world — the jews!!
The more wary black people do realize they are being used.
They don’t mind being “used”. They reap the benefits. They hate Whites just as much as the jews hate Whites.
The Russians are disappointed with Trump’s policy towards Russia. They have long given up hoping to partner with the US in building a just world order
Anyone who believed that the USA would ever build “a just world order” is terminally retarded and should consider submitting themselves for medically assisted euthanasia. Even more so if they believed that Zognald Trump would be the man to build it.
Always this fanciful invention! Why people can't acknowledge that Hitler attacked the USSR just out of blue? Russia was ruled for many years by pro-US liberals, and every thing damaging to Russia was unsealed and presented. During this long orgy of self-destruction, no evidence of any sort proving that Josef Stalin planned an attack on Germany was found. None! Stalin was painfully aware that the USSR could not fight with and against Germany. Stalin and the USSR leadership were quite fond of Nazi Germany at the time. Otto Strasser is the name to revoke and to remind us that this attitude was mutual. If Herr Hitler wouldn't accept British instigations for real thing, if he wouldn't attack Russia, he would live and die in peaceful old age. But alas, he rushed to Moscow and to his peril.
East German army general Bernd Schwipper published his thoroughly documented monograph on Operation Barbarossa, the German invasion, there can be no doubt that by ordering it, Hitler beat Stalin to it. Interpreting a wealth of original sources from the perspective of military science, Schwipper proves beyond any doubt that Stalin was planning to invade Germany sometime in July, 1941.
You write: “Why people can’t acknowledge that Hitler attacked the USSR just out of blue? Russia was ruled for many years by pro-US liberals, and every thing damaging to Russia was unsealed and presented. During this long orgy of self-destruction, no evidence of any sort proving that Josef Stalin planned an attack on Germany was found. None!”
My response: I will summarize some of the reasons why we know Stalin was preparing to attack Germany and all of Europe:
1. Stalin was moving approximately 24,000 tanks to his western front. Why did Stalin need so many tanks on his western front?
2. The Red Army lost 20,500 tanks between June and November 1941, amounting to 80% of its armored strength. (Source: McMeekin, Sean, Stalin’s War: A New History of World War II, New York: Basic Books, 2021, p. 381).
3. The Soviet Union built an entire family of BT tanks—the BT-2, BT-5, BT-7, BT-7A, and BT-7M. BT stands for bystrokhodnyi (high-speed) tank. At the beginning of World War II, the Red Army had 6,456 BT tanks, as many as all other operational tanks in the rest of the world. The BT tank’s most important characteristic–its speed–was achieved through the use of its wheels. The wheels of the BT tank made it impossible to use the BT tank successfully off the roads, or on the bad roads of the Soviet Union. In the battles fought on Soviet territory, thousands of BT tanks were abandoned. Historians say that Stalin’s BT tanks were not ready for war. This statement is not true. The BT tank was ready for an offensive war on German territory, but not in a defensive war fought on its own territory. (Source: Suvorov, Viktor, The Chief Culprit: Stalin’s Grand Design to Start World War II, Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2008, pp. 52-53).
4. The Soviet Union also built an outstanding family of amphibious tanks: the T-37A, T-38, and T-40. By June 22, 1941, the Soviet Union had over 4,000 amphibious tanks in its arsenal. The Soviet amphibious tanks in 1941 became unnecessary and played no role in the war. But the question remains: Why were the amphibious tanks developed and built? Why did Stalin need 4,000 amphibious tanks which could not be used in a defensive war? The obvious answer is that Stalin planned to use the amphibious tanks in a massive military invasion of Europe. (Source: Ibid., pp. 55-57).
5. Airborne assault troops were also part of Stalin’s plans. According to the official Communist Party newspaper, Pravda, on August 18, 1940, the Soviet Union had more than 1 million trained parachutists at the beginning of the war. Airborne assault troops can only be used during offensive operations and only in conjunction with regular troops advancing against the enemy.
6. The Red Army needed an air armada of transport planes and gliders to deliver hundreds of thousands of paratroopers. Soviet factories started the mass production of cargo gliders beginning in the spring of 1941. On April 23, 1941, Stalin and Molotov signed an order to accelerate the production of an 11-seat glider with a deadline of May 15, 1941, and of a 20-seat glider with a deadline of July 1, 1941. The gliders that were produced in the spring of 1941 had to be used by the latest in the early fall of 1941. Gliders had light and fragile bodies and wings and could not be parked outdoors. Keeping a huge cargo glider outdoors during fall winds and rains would harm it beyond repair. Since all available hangars were already full with previously produced gliders, the mass production of gliders in the spring of 1941 meant that they had to be used either in the summer of 1941 or early fall at the latest. (Source: Ibid., p. 76).
7. Cargo warplanes are used to deliver assault forces with parachutists to the enemy’s rear. Soviet war-transport aviation used the American Douglas DC-3, which was considered to be the best cargo plane in the world at the start of World War II, as its primary cargo plane. In 1938, the U.S. government sold to Stalin the production license and the necessary amount of the most complex equipment for the DC-3’s production. The Soviet Union also bought 20 DC-3s from the United States before the war. In 1939, the Soviet Union produced six identical DC-3 aircraft; in 1940, it produced 51 DC-3 aircraft; and in 1941, it produced 237 DC-3 aircraft. During the entire war 2,419 DC-3s or equivalent planes were produced in Soviet factories. (Source: Ibid., p. 77).
8. The Soviet gliders and transport planes would be easy prey for enemy fighters if the Soviet Union did not secure complete air superiority. The Red Army had to begin the war with a massive air attack and invasion against the enemy’s air bases. Tens of thousands of paratroopers could then be dropped to seize and control key bases and strategic sites. Any other scenario was not viable. Instead, it was Hitler who carried out a preemptive strike, and Stalin’s strategy to strike the first blow was aborted. The Soviet Union’s carefully designed plan to mount a massive air offensive followed by an assault of airborne troops had to be abandoned in the desperate rush to fight a defensive war. (Source: Ibid., pp. 77-78).
9. In the years 1937-1941, the Soviet Army grew five-fold, from 1.1 million to 5.5 million. This huge increase in the size of the Soviet Army was accomplished primarily by ratification of the universal military draft in the Soviet Union on Sept. 1, 1939. Several age groups were drafted into the Red Army at the same time; in essence, all of the young men in the country. The duration of army service for the majority of the draftees was two years, so the Soviet Union had to enter a major war within two years. If war did not start by then, all of the young people would have to go home on Sept. 1, 1941, and then there would be almost nobody left to draft. Stalin knew when he established the draft that in two years, in the summer of 1941, the Soviet Union must enter into a major war.
10. Stalin’s more than 200 submarines and the rest of his navy were ineffective at the start of the war because it was an attack fleet. Stalin’s navy was built for aggressive war and could not be used effectively in a defensive war.
11. The Ammunition Commissariat was created as a separate ministry to take care exclusively of the production of ammunition. This ministry had to determine where to locate all of the new factories that would be producing shells, gunpowder, cartridges, missiles, and other weapons. If Stalin had planned to conduct a defensive war, the new ammunition factories would have been built either behind the Volga River or even farther inland in the Ural Mountains. But no defensive options were ever discussed. Since Stalin planned to conduct an offensive operation into a war-devastated and weakened Europe, all of the new ammunition factories were built near the western border regions of the Soviet Union.
12. During the course of the Bessarabia campaign, the Soviet Union captured 141 locomotives, 1,866 covered train cars, 325 half-covered train cars, 45 platforms, 19 cisterns, 31 passenger cars, and two luggage cars. But this was not enough for Stalin. At the Soviet-Romanian talks in July 1940, Soviet representatives demanded that Romania return all captured mobile railroad units. On July 31, 1940, Romania agreed to transfer 175 locomotives and 4,375 cars to the Soviet Union by Aug. 25, 1940. None of these trains would have been needed in a defensive war. Stalin could only use these trains seized in Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina in an offensive war designed to take over all of Europe. (Source: Ibid., pp. 156-157).
13. On May 5, 1941, Stalin made it clear to his generals that the Soviet Union would be the aggressor in a war with Germany. At a banquet a Soviet general toasted Stalin’s peaceful foreign policy. Stalin intervened:
“Allow me to make a correction. A peaceful foreign policy secured peace in our country. A peaceful foreign policy is a good thing. For a while, we drew a line of defenses until we rearmed our army [and] supplied it with modern means of combat. Now, when our army has been rebuilt, our technology modernized, [now that we are] strong [enough] for combat, now we must shift from defense to offense. In conducting the defense of our country, we are compelled to act in an aggressive manner. From defense we have to shift to a military policy of offense. It is indispensable that we reform our training, our propaganda, our press to a mindset of offense. The Red Army is a modern army, and the modern army is an army of offense.”
The general who made the toast to Stalin’s peaceful foreign policy was discharged a few days after the banquet. (Source: Ibid., p. 205).
14. The Soviet Union was sending a massive amount of troops to the western border. This massive troop movement could not have been defensive. Troops preparing for defense dig themselves into the ground, close off roads, establish barbwire barriers, dig anti-tank trenches, and prepare covers behind the barricades. The Red Army did none of these things. Instead, the additional Soviet divisions began to hide in the border forests just like the German troops preparing for invasion. (Source: Ibid., pp. 207-217).
15. Suvorov also mentions that Soviet soldiers and officers were issued Russian-German and Russian-Romanian phrase books as part of their preparations for an invasion of Europe. Thousands of Soviet troops did not think to get rid of this compromising evidence when they were captured in the German invasion of the Soviet Union. The Russian-German phrase books were composed very simply: a question in Russian, followed by the same question in German written in Russian letters, then in German in Latin letters. If the Soviet soldier did not know how to pronounce the needed German phrase, he could point to the corresponding lines in the book and the Germans could read the lines themselves.
The phrases indicated that the Soviets were planning to conduct an offensive war in Europe. For example, some phrases asked: “Where is the burghermeister? Is there an observation point on the steeple?” There were no burghermeisters or steeples in the Soviet Union. These questions are relevant only if the Soviet soldiers were in Germany. Here are other examples: “Where is the fuel? Where is the garage? Where are the stores? Where is the water? Gather and bring here [so many] horses [farm animals], we will pay!” These questions and phrases would not be relevant on Soviet soil. The following phrases are also revealing: “You do not need to be afraid. The Red Army will come soon!” These phrases are not relevant for a war conducted on Soviet soil. (Source: Ibid., pp. 257-258).
16. Within less than a year, the Soviet Union destroyed a Japanese army in Mongolia, took over the eastern part of Poland by military force, conducted an extremely difficult and successful invasion of Finland, forced the Baltic nations of Estonia, Lithuania, and Latvia to join the Soviet Union against their will, and took possession of Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina from Romania. These Soviet military conquests and ultimatums expanded the Soviet Union’s territory by 426,000 square kilometers, approximately equal to the surface area of the German Reich in 1919. (Source: Hoffmann, Joachim, Stalin’s War of Extermination, 1941-1945: Planning, Realization, and Documentation, Capshaw, AL: Theses & Dissertations Press, 2001, p. 31).
17. After the division of Poland by the Soviet Union and Germany, Soviet troops could have created a powerful barrier on the new Soviet-German border. In 1939 conditions for defense along the Soviet-German border were highly favorable: forests, rivers, swamps, few roads, and lots of time. However, instead of making the area impassable, it was quickly made more penetrable. The Red Army tore down previously existing fortifications and buried them under mounds of ground. The Soviet Union also stopped producing anti-tank and anti-aircraft cannon. The Soviet Union had huge land mine production that could have been used for defense, but after the new borders with Germany were established this production was curbed.
18. The Red Army also dismantled the security pale created earlier on the old western borders, and failed to create a new security pale on the Polish territory annexed to the Soviet Union.
19. The Soviet Union also constructed new railroads and railroad bridges in the western border regions. Almost all railroad troops were concentrated in the western border regions. The railroad troops worked intensively to modernize old railroads and build new ones right up to the border. Simultaneously with the construction of railroads, automobile roads were built in the western regions. The Red Army was building railroads and roads from east to west, which is usually done when preparing for advance, for a quick transfer of reserves, and for further supplying the troops after they crossed the borders. All of this work was designed for offense and hurt the Soviet Union in a defensive war. When Germany attacked the Soviet Union, German troops used the roads, bridges, supplies, rails, and sectional bridges constructed by the Soviets in the western regions to aid their advance into Soviet territory.
20. From 1926 to 1937, the Soviet Union constructed 13 fortified regions along its western borders known unofficially as “the Stalin Line.” There were many differences between the Soviet Stalin Line and the French Maginot Line. Unlike the French Maginot Line, the Stalin Line was built in secrecy and not publicized. The Stalin Line was much deeper and was built not only to stop infantry, but mostly to stop tanks. The Soviets also used huge quantities of steel and granite boulders in addition to concrete. The Stalin Line was built from the Baltic Sea in the north to the Black Sea in the south and could not be bypassed. Finally, unlike the Maginot Line, the Stalin Line was not built at the very border, but further into Soviet territory.
The 13 fortified regions on the Stalin Line were built for defense and came at a tremendous cost in effort and money. Each fortified region was also a military formation that could independently conduct military operations during a long period of time and in isolated conditions. In 1938 it was decided to strengthen all 13 regions by building heavy artillery installations within them. The Soviet Union also started construction of eight more fortified regions. Then, when the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact created a common border between Germany and the Soviet Union, Stalin ordered further construction of the fortified regions to stop. The existing fortified regions were disarmed, and everything connected with defense was dismantled and destroyed.
20. The construction of a new line of fortified regions began during the summer of 1940 on the new Soviet-German border. These new regions were unofficially referred to as the Molotov Line, but they were never finished. The defense buildup on the new borders proceeded very slowly, while the destruction of the Stalin Line was surprisingly fast. When Germany attacked the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941, the Molotov Line was not yet built. Soviet generals and marshals after Stalin’s death expressed their anger. They asked: How could Stalin liquidate and disarm the fortified regions on the old borders without building the necessary defenses on the new western borders? The answer is that Stalin was not planning to fight on his territory; Stalin was planning an offensive war against all of Europe.
21. The records of a conference of the Soviet High Command held in Moscow from Dec. 23, 1940, through the evening of Dec. 31, 1940, also indicate that the Soviet Union was planning a massive offensive against Europe. This extremely secret meeting was attended by 274 of the highest-ranking leaders of the Red Army. Most of the speakers discussed the importance of the new tactics of sudden surprise attack. Defense at the primary locations of attack was not foreseen, even theoretically. The Soviet military leaders made it clear at the conference that they had no established contemporary defense theory. Soviet military leaders also did not work on questions of defense after the conference. The goal of the Red Army was to conduct grandiose sudden offensive operations that overwhelmed the enemy on its own territory.
22. During the German invasion of the Soviet Union in June 1941, Yakov Iosifovich Dzhugashvili, the son of Stalin, was taken prisoner by the Germans. Stalin’s son was searched and questioned. A letter dated June 11, 1941, was found in his pockets from another officer stating: “I am at the training camps. I would like to be home by fall, but the planned walk to Berlin might hinder this.” German intelligence officers asked Yakov Dzhugashvili to clarify the statement about the “planned walk to Berlin.” Stalin’s son read the letter and quietly muttered: “Damn it!” Obviously, the letter indicates that Soviet forces were planning to invade Germany later that year.
23. German intelligence officers also asked Stalin’s son why the Soviet artillery, which had the best cannon and howitzers in the world, fired so poorly. Stalin’s son truthfully answered: “The maps let the Red Army down, because the war, contrary to expectations, unfolded to the east of the state border.” The Soviet maps were of territories in which the Red Army planned to advance, and were useless for defending the country. Storages of topographic maps located unreasonably close to the border were either destroyed by the advancing German army or by the retreating Soviet forces. In 1941, the Red Army fought without maps, and the Soviet artillery could not fire accurately without maps.
24. Every Soviet commander, starting with regiment level and higher, had in his safe a so-called “Red Packet,” which contained the plans for war. When Germany invaded, the commanders opened their “Red Packets,” but they did not find in them anything useful for defense. The Red Army had neither prepared for defense nor conducted any training in defensive operations. The defensive operations of the Red Army in the summer of 1941 were pure improvisation.
25. Further evidence that the Soviet Union was planning to attack Germany is provided by Andrei Vlasov, a Soviet general who had been captured by the Germans. During a conversation in 1942 with SS Gen. Richard Hildebrandt, Vlasov was asked if and when Stalin had intended to attack Germany. Hildebrandt later stated: “Vlasov responded by saying that the attack was planned for August-September 1941. The Russians had been preparing the attack since the beginning of the year, which took quite a while because of the poor Russian railroad network. Hitler had sized up the situation entirely correctly, and had struck directly into the Russian buildup. This, said Vlasov, is the reason for the tremendous initial German successes.”
26. The Molotov-Ribbentrop pact began to unravel when Soviet Foreign Minister Molotov arrived in Berlin on November 12, 1940. Molotov presented to Hitler a long list of ridiculous territorial claims on behalf of the Soviet Union. Molotov demanded strongholds in Yugoslavia, in the Adriatic Sea, in Greece, in the Bosporus and Dardanelles, in the Persian Gulf; he demanded that countries south of the Baku-Batumi line, in the direction of the Persian Gulf, be given over to Soviet control, including eastern Turkey, northern Iran, and Iraq.
27. Hitler had been preparing for an invasion of Great Britain when Stalin demanded new territories in Europe–territories on which Germany’s economy and armed forces heavily depended. After Molotov’s departure, Hitler gathered his most trusted subordinates and clearly let them understand that he planned to invade the Soviet Union. (Source: Bassil Henry Liddel Hart, The second World War, Moscow: Voyenizdat, p. 145).
28. Suvorov states in “The Chief Culprit” that both German and Soviet forces were positioned for attack on June 22, 1941. The position of the divisions of the Red Army and the German army on the border mirrored each other. The airfields of both armies were moved all the way up to the border. From the defensive point of view, this kind of deployment of troops and airfields by both armies was stupid and suicidal. Whichever army attacked first would be able to easily encircle the troops of the other army. Hitler attacked first to enable German troops to trap and encircle the best units of the Red Army.
29. Hitler states toward the end of his speech on June 22, 1941 that he was invading the Soviet Union to prevent an attack on not only Germany, but all of Europe.
30. Gen. Heinz Guderian expressed his opinion after the war: “…The Russians would have won the war even without the help of their Western allies and would have occupied the whole of Europe. No power on earth could have stopped them.” (Source: Guderian, Heinz, Panzer Leader, New York: E. P. Dutton & Co., Inc., 1952, p. 283).
31) The Dnepr military flotilla was created in the early 1930s to prevent the establishment and crossing of temporary bridges across the river. The flotilla included 120 warships and motorboats, as well as its own air force with shoreline and air defense batteries. The Dnepr flotilla could securely close off the roads to the industrial regions in the south of Ukraine and to the Black Sea bases of the Soviet Navy. A German attack could be stopped on the Dnepr line, or at least held up for several months. However, when Hitler attacked France, Stalin ordered the removal of mines from the Dnepr river bridges and disbanded the military flotilla. The Dnepr flotilla could only be used in a defensive war on Soviet territory, and Stalin did not believe he needed it. (Source: Suvorov, Viktor, The Chief Culprit: Stalin’s Grand Design to Start World War II, Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2008, pp. 190-191).
Stalin divided the defensive Dnepr flotilla into two flotillas: the Danube flotilla and the Pinsk flotilla. The Danube flotilla would be useless in a defensive war. In an offensive war, however, the Danube flotilla could be deadly for Germany. It only had to sail 300 or 400 kilometers up the river to the strategically important bridge at Chernavoda, where it could disrupt the petroleum supply from Ploieşti to the port of Constanza. The entire German war machine could be stopped simply because German tanks, planes, and warships would be out of fuel. However, when Germany attacked the Soviet Union, the Danube flotilla found itself cut off from Soviet troops without the possibility of retreat. Most of its ships had to be sunk, while gigantic supplies were either destroyed or left behind. (Source: Ibid., pp. 191-192).
The Pinsk flotilla would also be difficult to use for defense. The Pinsk flotilla had 66 river warships and cutters, a squadron of airplanes, a company of marines, and other units. In the defensive war of 1941, the Soviets had to blow up and abandon all of the ships of the Pinsk flotilla. However, in a war of aggression, the Pinsk flotilla could have used the newly constructed canal from Pinsk to Kobrin, which would then allow its ships to reach the Vistula basin and head further west to the German rivers. In 1945, a Soviet admiral reached Berlin with his flotilla. (Source: Ibid., pp. 193-194).
32) The actions of the Red Army during the first days of the war speak best about Soviet intentions to conduct an offensive war. Up until June 30, 1941, Gen. Zhukov insisted on advance and demanded that commanders of Soviet forces aimed at Romania and Hungary exclusively attack. Zhukov stopped the attack only when he and his colleagues concluded that his armies could no longer advance. On June 22, 1941, several other Soviet commanders also followed prewar plans without awaiting orders from Moscow, and attacked the following regions: the Rava-Russkaya region, Tilzit in Eastern Prussia, and the Polish city of Suvalki. (Source: Ibid., p. 255).
33) The actions of the Soviet fleet during the first days of the war also show with sufficient clarity its plans for offense. On June 22, 1941, the submarines of the Baltic fleet sailed toward the shores of Germany with the objective of sinking all enemy ships and vessels according to the rules of unrestricted warfare. No exceptions were made, not even for medical vessels sailing under the Red Cross flag. Soviet submarines from the Black Sea fleet immediately sailed into the sea toward the shores of Romania, Bulgaria, and Turkey. On June 25 and 26, 1941, the Black Sea fleet’s cruisers carried out an intensive artillery raid in the vicinity of the Romanian port of Constanta. At the same time, the Danube military flotilla began an assault in the Danube river delta. The garrison of the Soviet naval base Hanko also conducted intensive assault operations during the beginning of the war, taking over 19 Finnish islands in the course of several days. (Source: Ibid., pp. 253-255).
34) The Soviet air force also acted in an aggressive manner at the start of the war. On June 25, 1941, despite losses suffered during the first days of the war, Soviet air forces bombed all known air fields of the southern part of Finland. On June 23, 1941, acting according to plans, the Soviet long-range bomber air force carried out a massive attack against military targets in Koenigsberg and Danzig. Soviet long-range bombers also began to bomb the Ploieşti oil fields in Romania on June 26, 1941. After a few days of raids, the amount of oil Germany obtained in Romania was reduced almost in half. If Hitler had not attacked first, the Soviet air force would have been much more dangerous, and could have totally paralyzed the entire German war effort through its strikes against the oil-producing regions. (Source: Ibid., p. 254).
35) If Stalin was preparing for a defensive war, he should have ordered his plane designers to create the best fighters in the world, capable of defending the skies over the Soviet Union. But fighters did not interest Stalin. Stalin ordered his fighter designer to drop all his work on the creation of a fighter and start developing a light bomber, named the Ivanov originally, and later the Su-2 in honor of its creator, P. O. Sukhoi.
36) The ideal combat plane Stalin developed was a light bomber designed to operate free of enemy resistance. Record-breaking characteristics were not required; Stalin demanded only simplicity, durability, and firepower. Stalin planned to create a plane that could be produced in numbers exceeding all warplanes of all types of all countries in the world. Literally, Stalin planned to build as many light bombers as there were small but mobile horsemen in the hordes of Genghis Kahn.
Germany carried out a preemptive strike on Soviet air bases when it invaded the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941. Hitler’s preemptive strike did not permit the Su-2 to do the work it was primarily designed to do. The Su-2 was ineffective and not needed in a defensive war. Production of 100,000 to 150,000 Su-2 planes had been planned for conditions in which the Red Army would deliver the first attack, and nobody would hinder production of the plane. Hitler’s invasion ruined Stalin’s plan. Production of the Su-2 was stopped, but the Soviet Union produced tens of thousands of planes later in the war that were much more complex in terms of production than the Su-2. (Source: Ibid., pp. 64-65).
37) The Soviet air force exceeded that of Germany both in plane quantity and plane quality at the start of the war. Suvorov asks: Why then in the first stage of the war did the Soviet air force lose air superiority from day one? The answer is that the majority of Soviet pilots, including fighter pilots, were not taught dogfighting. Soviet aviation was designed to conduct one grandiose, sudden, aggressive operation to crush the enemy’s air force on the ground in one raid and obtain air superiority. Hitler’s preemptive strike prevented Soviet aviation from accomplishing its planned aggressive operations of unheard-of dimensions. (Source: Ibid., pp. 69-72).
38) In the summer of 1940, Stalin brought Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania into the Soviet Union, and concentrated his forces in that region on the border of Eastern Prussia. The occupation of these Baltic countries by the Red Army made sense only if there were plans for an aggressive war against Germany. The Red Army transferred its air bases to the very front edge of the German border. From the air bases in Lithuania the Soviet air force could support the advance of Soviet troops to Berlin. The Soviet navy also transferred primary forces and reserves to naval bases established in Tallinn, Riga, and Liepāja. Since it was a short distance from Liepāja to the routes taken by German vessels carrying ore, nickel, and wood to Germany, a strike from this area could be sudden and devastating. (Source: Ibid., pp. 150-152).
39) On June 13, 1941, TASS broadcast that “Germany was following the conditions of the Soviet-German pact as flawlessly as the Soviet Union,” and that rumors of an impending German attack on the USSR “were clumsily fabricated propaganda by the enemies of Germany and the USSR, interested in broadening and prolonging the war.” The TASS announcement also stated, “Rumors that the USSR is preparing for war against Germany are false and provocative.…” However, the reality is that Soviet troops were already traveling to the western border. June 13, 1941, marked the beginning of the biggest organized movement of troops, arms, ammunition, and other military supplies in history.
For example, the First Strategic Echelon of the Red Army had 170 tank, motorized, cavalry, and rifle divisions. Fifty-six of them were already located right on the border and could not move any farther ahead. All of the remaining 114 divisions began to move toward the border in the wake of the reassuring TASS announcement on June 13, 1941.
Suvorov writes: “I have interviewed hundreds of people from that generation, and they all had forebodings of war. Where did they come from? They could not have known about Hitler’s preparations. They must have seen the preparations of the Red Army and understood that war was unavoidable…Between June 12 and June 15, all the western military districts were issued an order to move all deeply located divisions closer to the state borders.” (Source: Ibid., pp. 207-217).
40) Suvorov shows a picture of a Soviet 8-inch Howitzer B-4. He writes: “Each projectile weighed 220 pounds. These guns were used primarily for an offensive war in order to break hardened enemy defenses or during an assault on cities. By the summer of 1941 the Red Army had concentrated hundreds of them on the German border, each with a supply of 600 rounds of ammunition. In a defensive war, they proved to be of little use, until 1944 when the Red Army crossed into Germany for the final offensive during the war.”
41). In another picture, Suvorov writes: “The Red Army was trained to cross rivers, a key element in an offensive war. In a defensive war, a retreating army uses its own bridges and then destroys them.”
42). Suvorov writes in other pictures: “T-34 tanks, abandoned by the Red Army in the summer of 1941, fought under the German flag for the rest of the war…Even the best German Panzer divisions were using Soviet T-34 tanks.”
43). German soldiers soon found out the extent of the Soviet preparedness when they invaded the Soviet Union. A prime example is German pilot Hans-Ulrich Rudel, who flew a Ju-87 and completed 2,430 battle missions. He wrote shortly after the German invasion of the Soviet Union:
“While flying over these numerous airbases and fortifications, we all had the same thought in our heads–how lucky we were to have struck first. It seemed that the Soviets were feverishly readying the groundwork for an attack on us. And which other Western country could Russia have attacked? If the Russians had completed their preparations, there would have been almost no hope of stopping them…” (Source: Ibid., p. 252).
44). Marshal of the Soviet Union I. K. Bagramian said: “When I was studying the operational plans, I was struck by the following fact—our frontier army had neither a deployment nor a border-protection plan.” Bagramian said that during the training exercises only offensive tactics were worked on, and on the maps the war took place on German territory. (Source Ibid., p. 199).
To be brief, while much or most of the evidence you cite may be accurate, you misinterpret it.
'My response: I will summarize some of the reasons why we know Stalin was preparing to attack Germany and all of Europe:
Thanks DiCarlo. Here’s my widely read research on it, posted in 2011, 14 years ago. Over 180,000 reads and not a single word has ever been challenged. https://carolynyeager.net/fake-legends-adolf-hitler%E2%80%99s-%E2%80%9Cjewish-grandfather%E2%80%9D
Arrogant much? My comments must trouble you. One is bound to get the most flack when flying over the target. I don't know you, or what you post about, nor do I care, but are you truly so obtuse, or is this an act?Replies: @ariadna
Your comments are superficial and are based on banal observations and click bait level sourcing.
“are you truly so obtuse, or is this an act?”
No, it is not an act. It’s authentic..
Your comments are superficial and are based on banal observations and click bait level sourcing.
Arrogant much? My comments must trouble you. One is bound to get the most flack when flying over the target. I don’t know you, or what you post about, nor do I care, but are you truly so obtuse, or is this an act?
That’s funny, PooBear. Do you abide by the standards you demand of others?
Please try to be more objective and analytical in your comments, and be prepared to back them up,
Did you catch the recent Hollywood production of Stalin’s Choice or The Ukrainian Boy in the Gulag? No? How about Lenin’s List? I guess the crimes of the Bolsheviks/Soviets are of little interest to “western” media or academia. I wonder why that is…..?
The Ukrainian Holodomor was an internal matter, not naked violent theft, conquest, land acquisition, and displacement and slavery of native populations
Just over 50 years ago the Ukraine and its neighbouring areas, the Don, the Volga and the Kuban - a great stretch of territory….[wherein] One quarter of the rural population lay dead or dying, the rest in various stages of debilitation with no strength to bury their families or neighbors…well-fed squads of police and government officials supervised the victims.
This was the climax of the “revolution form above,” as Josef Stalin put it, in which the Soviet leader and his associates crushed two elements seen as irremediably hostile to the regime: the Soviet peasantry as a whole and the Ukrainian nation in particular.
By 1929…Stalin was at last ready to give effect to his hostility against what he saw as centrifugal tendencies in the countryside. He began with a double-blow: dekulakization and collectivization.
Vladimir Ilyich Lenin, the father of the Soviet Union, envisioned the kulak - literally “fist” - as a rich, exploiting class against whom, after the removal of the landlords proper, peasant hatred could be equally directed…
In practice, then, dekulakization meant the killing or deportation to the Arctic of millions of peasants with their families - in principle the better-off, in practice, the most influential and most resistant to the party’s plans.
In 1932-33, accompanied by an attack on all Ukrainian cultural and intellectual centres and leaders, as well as on the Ukrainian churches, came what may be described as a terror-famine. It was inflicted on the collectivized peasants by setting grain quotas far above the possible, while removing every handful of food and preventing outside help…
A decree passed the previous August had ordered that all collective farm property such as cattle and grain should henceforth be considered state property, “sacred and inviolable.” Those guilty of offences against the decree were to be considered enemies of the people, to be shot unless there were extenuating circumstances, when the penalty must be imprisonment for not less than 10 years, with confiscation of property.
From August 1932, there was a great increase in the extent and severity of the law and its enforcement. From the court in Kharkov alone, 1,500 death sentences were reported in one month…
As the winter of 1932 wore on, famine in the Ukrainian countryside grew steadily worse. On Nov. 20, a Government decree withheld the distribution of any grain at all to peasants in payment for their work on collective farms until Stalin’s grain delivery quota had been met.
Villages that could not meet the demands were literally blockaded. A month later, a list was published of whole districts “to which supplies of commercial products have been halted until they achieve a decisive improvement fulfilment of grain collective plans.” Inhabitants of these blockaded districts were deported en masse to the north.
[ROBERT CONQUEST, The Harvest of Sorrow: Soviet Collectivization and the Terror-Famine]
Why did you not remain in Russia, PooBear?
[…] What that worker said at least 96 per cent of the people of Russia are thinking. There has been construction, but, in the act of building, all that was best in Russia has disappeared. The main result of the Five Year Plan has been the tragic ruin of Russian agriculture. This ruin I saw in its grim reality. I tramped through a number of villages in the snow of March. I saw children with swollen bellies. I slept in peasants' huts, sometimes nine of us in one room.
I talked to every peasant I met, and the general conclusion I draw is that the present state of Russian agriculture is already catastrophic but that in a year's time its condition will have worsened tenfold.
"What about your cows?" was the next question. To the Russian peasant the cow means wealth, food and happiness. It is almost the centre-point upon which his life gravitates.
"The cattle have nearly all died. How can we feed the cattle when we have only fodder to eat ourselves?"
What of the towns? Moscow as yet does not look so stricken, and no one staying in Moscow would have an inkling of what is going on in the countryside, unless he could talk to the peasants who have come hundreds and hundreds of miles to the capital to look for bread. The people in Moscow warmly clad, and many of the skilled workers, who have their warm meal every day at the factory, are well fed. Some of those who earn very good salaries, or who have special privileges, look even, well dressed, but the vast majority of the unskilled workers are feeling the pinch.
And now a new dread visits the Russian worker. That is unemployment. In the last few months very many thousands have been dismissed from factories in many parts of the Soviet Union. I asked one unemployed man what happened to him. He replied: "We are treated like cattle. We are told to get away, and we get no bread card. How can I live? I used to get a pound of bread a day for all my family, but now there is no bread card. I have to leave the city and make my way out into the countryside where there is also no bread."
The Five-Year Plan has built many fine factories. But it is bread that makes factory wheels go round, and the Five-Year Plan has destroyed the bread-supplier of Russia.
[The London Evening Standard, March 31st, 1933, FAMINE RULES RUSSIA -The 5-year Plan Has Killed the Bread Supply, GARETH JONES]
thank you Tiptoe, for setting the record straight.
It bothers me that Russia and Putin, (whom I generally support in ZOG’s current war against Russia), continue to pretend that the Holodomor never happened, and that the Red Army were ‘liberators’; a vile and repulsive lie, whose only ‘justification’ is the vanity of the tender Russian ego.
They’ll unleash every Jewish lie that has ever been said about Germany and the ‘Holocaust’ and the men, (often Russian), who fought the Soviet menace, as ‘traitors’ to Russia, which would be like calling the Palestinians, ‘traitors to Israel’. That’s how unapologetically rancid is their rationale, that once the genocidal Bolsheviks had taken over Russia, and butchered the Romanov family, that now all Russian nationals were by ‘honor’ obliged to fight for the Bolsheviks.
An inversion of the truth, and every tenet of honor or decency- how very Jewish, but the Russians play along with that particular Jewish lie, because it suits their nationalistic vanity and hubris to do so.
I don’t buy it. Tell it to the still sleeping masses. The ongoing & constant vilification & demonization of Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich in mainstream publications, the media, and documentaries, is to prevent & discourage the disclosure of Hitler’s (German) Economic & Social miracle, which, during his reign, kicked out the parasitic influence of International Jewry. Many philo-semitic propagandists and (((bankers))) worked to sully this success story with the lie that Germany arose only through re-armament, and that jewish money-changers financed the Third Reich.
The National Socialists had discovered the larceny and criminal nature of the jews and actually did the necessary tasks for relieving the country of those parasites. They rebuilt Germany without the need for jewish gold or jewish loans. This scared the shit out of the jews. The Nazis could kill any number of jews, confiscate the goods and moneys that the jews had swindled from the German People, and replace the treasonous jews in all levels of society with loyal Germans — but that was of far less concern to world jewry than the fact that Hitler had taken the German banking system out of their greedy hands. With no banking swindle, the jews could not steal the wealth of the German People with the impunity that they had enjoyed for the previous decades.
Without their power over banking and issuing credit to control inflation, deflation, create depressions and investment bubbles, using gold and credit to suck the wealth of the non-Jews into their pockets through banking and finance, the jews would be reduced to working for a living rather than stealing and swindling for a living. The Jews only have two powers — money and lies. “Their” money, they get from the goyim. And if the goyim cannot be deceived and lied to, then they can’t get our money. Thus, the Jews want everyone to believe their lies about the Hitler and the National Socialists.
The jews were (and still are) afraid that other people of the world besides the Germans will also discover that the world does so very much better without any jews. It is for this reason that the jewsmedia pounds away with their non-stop anti-German and anti-Nazi propaganda. The jews do not want anyone thinking intelligently about the Third Reich; they want knee-jerk reactions against them, not logical thinking.
Sure, I’d be happy to explain. White people were far more racially conscious back then. Jewish power was much less in ascendency then than now. The afluent Zionist leaders of America wanted those Jews in Palestine, not in the US. That is your opinion and not evidence. FDR is on public record as not wanting Jewish refugees in America. He did not suggest that they go to Palestine. A Jewish controlled FDR would have let them in America even if the ultimate destination was British Palestine. I just linked to an article showing that FDR actually looked into moving them to Africa. You haven't made the case for a Jewish controlled FDR. His actions speak to someone that wanted war with Hitler but also did not want European Jewish refugees in America. That is not a contradictory position nor was it unique. Jewish refugees had a hard time finding anyone to take them despite the fact that most countries sided with the Allies.
The Jews controlled FDR and yet he turned down Jewish refugees? Why don’t you explain that to us.
FDR’ s administration was filled with communist jews. Practically all of his close advisors were jews. The jews wanted war with Germany and FDR did as he was told.
FDR wanted a European front and it was Hitler that gave it to him.
That is your opinion and not evidence.
Well, I’m quite sure there’s no possibility you’ll accept the truth. Many of FDR’s jews were directly responsible for plunging America into WWII by deliberately alienating America from anti-Communist countries such as Germany and Japan long before the outbreak of hostilities. FDR allied the capitalist US with the Communist butcher of his own people. How’d that work out for us? These jews also pioneered the idea of Big Egalitarian Government in America; some of them were later discovered to have been spies for the Soviet Union.
FDR’S JEWS:
I tend to take care with this sort of thing. Point to ten whom you say are Jews and they all indeed are Jews -- you've got a strong case. Point to twelve, say they are all Jews, and two aren't Jews -- your post can be dismissed as the ravings of an antisemite.
Well, perhaps a mistaken assumption on my part considering that he worked with a large cabal of jews,
Point to twelve, say they are all Jews, and two aren’t Jews — your post can be dismissed as the ravings of an antisemite.
Well, I didn’t mention 12 jews and 2 weren’t. I mentioned 36 individuals and identified all correctly except one — perhaps, who, by the way, fit all the prerequisites for a jew. What was pointless and annoying was your petty objection, your exaggerations, and your condescending lecture.
Oh, and yes, you’ve found me out. I am an anti-semite. Raving? Not so much.
The Jews controlled FDR and yet he turned down Jewish refugees? Why don’t you explain that to us.
Sure, I’d be happy to explain. White people were far more racially conscious back then. Jewish power was much less in ascendency then than now. The afluent Zionist leaders of America wanted those Jews in Palestine, not in the US. It took the Jews almost a decade to manipulate the US into position for another war against Germany. For them to act on behalf of a few jew/commie have-nots was not to Jewry’s benefit. The jews needed a militant, invigorated cadre of Jews, willing to displace the inhabitants of Palestine. If they needed to sacrifice some of their own, it was a small price to pay. They’d only point the finger of blame at someone else, anyway.
Stop making assumptions in defense of Hitler. If you are going to promote a “Hitler ain’t so bad” narrative then at least read about the period first.
Are you denying that the US Navy was making numerous unprovoked attacks against German shipping, including U-boats? Perhaps you’re the one who needs to read up.
FDR wanted a European front and it was Hitler that gave it to him.
FDR’ s administration was filled with communist jews. Practically all of his close advisors were jews. The jews wanted war with Germany and FDR did as he was told. Why was it supremely important for jews to destroy Germany? Hitler kicked out the jew banks, that is the whole jew money system of usury, and printed Germany’s own currency. In less than 2 years, Germany went from being destitute, bankrupted by WW1, the draconian unfair terms of the Versailles Treaty, the additional financial mismanagement and corruption of 15 years of the jew run Weimar Republic, and the entire world mired in the Great Depression, to German financial solvency, while the rest of the world suffered the Depression. From the depths of bankruptcy, Germany became the most prosperous nation in Europe in less than three years of Hitler’s National Socialism. It worked so magically and magnificently, once realized by by the people, it would bring on the death of the entire jew crooked money system. Any country could achieve the same success by removing jews. The jews knew they had to destroy Hitler’s system however necessary or their own would be destroyed, and with it their plan to rule the world.
Sure, I’d be happy to explain. White people were far more racially conscious back then. Jewish power was much less in ascendency then than now. The afluent Zionist leaders of America wanted those Jews in Palestine, not in the US. That is your opinion and not evidence. FDR is on public record as not wanting Jewish refugees in America. He did not suggest that they go to Palestine. A Jewish controlled FDR would have let them in America even if the ultimate destination was British Palestine. I just linked to an article showing that FDR actually looked into moving them to Africa. You haven't made the case for a Jewish controlled FDR. His actions speak to someone that wanted war with Hitler but also did not want European Jewish refugees in America. That is not a contradictory position nor was it unique. Jewish refugees had a hard time finding anyone to take them despite the fact that most countries sided with the Allies.
The Jews controlled FDR and yet he turned down Jewish refugees? Why don’t you explain that to us.
FDR’ s administration was filled with communist jews. Practically all of his close advisors were jews. The jews wanted war with Germany and FDR did as he was told.
FDR wanted a European front and it was Hitler that gave it to him.
It’s always couched in an alleged extermination plan for the Slavs.
yes, that’s all you hear, but I just don’t see it.
The common denominator with the Boer war, the Russo-Japanese War, the ((Russian)) revolution and WWI and WWII and all the post 9/11 wars, and the Ukraine war is what?
Yep, globalist, genocidal Jewish supremacists, in control of the central banks.
I know Russians and Germans, and in neither case, do I see a proclivity towards hatred and treachery and genocide.
But I see those qualities bursting out of “Russians” like Max Boot, and Victoria Nuland, and Bibi and Lazar Kaganovitch and Bela Kun, and on and on and on…
They are always the common denominator with these wars and atrocities, like the Holodomor, and I’ve heard convincing evidence about the Armenian genocide, as well.
But why should anyone be surprised, when all anyone has to do is look at their defining ethos; the Talmud, and religious narrative, to see their holiest of hollies, is to genocide every one else.
I’m skeptical that most of these people are really appalled by the threat to the Russian people. Rather, I think the hysterical talk about the 1941 invasion, beyond the propaganda aspect, which convinces a lot of people, is that it was possible that Soviet Communism would have been extinguished.
I suppose it falls into two camps. One are the ethnic Slavs, and the other are hard, committed leftist commies.
For the Slavs, they’ve been taught that the Germans invaded because Hitler wanted to kill them all and steal their land. But it’s like Gaza in more ways than people appreciate. Because what we’re always told, is the ZOG lies, or the ((narrative)), and the way the ‘narrative’ always goes, is that everyone was just fine, and minding their own business, until the evil people, (the Boers, the Russians, the Austria-Hungarians, the Germans, now the Russians again, and the Palestinians..), all in the sudden decided to attack their neighbors because they are all evil.
Oct, 7th didn’t happen in a vacuum. It started in 1948, and even before that. The 1941 invasion, didn’t start in 1941, but goes back to Versaille, and even before that. But the narrative will tell you it all started on Oct, 7th, out of the blue, because those people are simply evil.
All of these conflicts, are all carefully lied about. Ukraine didn’t start in 2022, as the ZOG lies will tell you, but it goes back to 2014, and even before that. But the narrative is that out of the blue, Putin attacked Ukraine, because he’s evil.
The Jew finds advantage in using it’s monopoly control over ‘the narrative’, to always shill the lies that suit the Jew. We should just stop playing along.
Without ZOG, Russia and Germany would be strong allies today, and all through the 20th and 21st centuries – except for the eternal Jew. Who finds fun and profit in fomenting hatred and strife and war. And is actively attempting, (as I write this) to foment war between Russia and Germany.
If it weren’t for ZOG, Russia and Germany today would have very close ties, working together for mutual prosperity, as would Ukraine and all the rest.
But the Jew will not have that. Not today, and not in the last century.
As for the leftist communists, I sort of ‘get’ that too, in the naive way of a general equality of opportunity, that would be ideal, but alas, communism is always run by people, and people are very flawed. And if the Jew is involved, then genocide will also be in the works.
One good place to start would be to cease regarding the term "anti-Semitic" as pejorative, rather than simply descriptive.
We should just stop playing along.
It sure did, with massive public debt that was hidden in Mefobills. A short vignette-slice-of history used to generalize the greater trend to toward a commonweal of summer bonus is fraught with fragility and speculation. About as reliable as the world average temperature and sea level in 2100.This wonderful "social contract" that Mr. Hilter and his strudel strutters had created and envisioned as the Thousand Year Reich, necessitated invading, killing locals who resented the Germans taking their food and provisions, stealing their land, and impressing them into slavery. Germany became the next Rome, needing foreign resources through subjugation and slave labor. Perché pensi questo? {Understanding Russophilia: A Fondness for Russia's Culture, History, and People
German National Socialism provided a real model of such prosperity extended to all social classes, which was reached in an unprecedented short span of time, and was defeated only by huge external forces brought to bear upon it. So, what’s wrong with speculating on the consequences of of an imaginary win of Germany is only that It would never have been allowed to happen by the enormous financial and military power of the “Allies.”
the Thousand Year Reich, necessitated invading, killing locals who resented the Germans taking their food and provisions, stealing their land, and impressing them into slavery.
how would you characterize the Soviet treatment of the Ukrainian peasant farmer, if not far worse than the above? (starving their entire families- an entire class of people – to death by the millions).
I think had there been no Bolshevik/Soviet threat, there would never would have been any Nazis, who arose out of a survival response to that threat.
Just like Hamas is a resistance to Jewish genocide, so too were the Nazis a resistance to Jewish genocide.
The same can be said for what the Jewish media calls the ‘far-right rising’ in Europe. They are not evil racists coming to power to kill all people of color. They’re simply a people, (an entire civilization, actually), targeted and slated for genocide by Jewish supremacy, and are being driven to support the ‘far-right’, (what many people call ‘Nazis’), because they don’t want to be genocided.
there are a lot of people out there, (assorted leftists and so forth), who believe that the only true imperative of human existence, is that there is no such thing as race, and that the white race Must be blended out of existence.
That’s why there are protests in Portland and Chicago today, because these leftists believe that all POC have a right to invade white nations, and replace the white people, because there’s no such thing as race.
Possibly Else Wagner was Jewish, and Wikipedia is obscuring the fact -- but I'd like to hear the evidence.Replies: @DICARLO
'...Klaus Emil Julius Fuchs was born in Rüsselsheim, Grand Duchy of Hesse, on 29 December 1911, the third of four children of a Lutheran pastor, Emil Fuchs, and his wife Else Wagner...'
What makes you say Klaus Fuchs was Jewish? From Wikipedia:
Well, perhaps a mistaken assumption on my part considering that he worked with a large cabal of jews, creating a weapon of mass murder and destruction, was a communist who provided secret information to the Soviet Union, and a spy, so I just assumed … quacks like a duck!
Perhaps I read it somewhere which wasn’t a jew approved site like wikipedia?
I tend to take care with this sort of thing. Point to ten whom you say are Jews and they all indeed are Jews -- you've got a strong case. Point to twelve, say they are all Jews, and two aren't Jews -- your post can be dismissed as the ravings of an antisemite.
Well, perhaps a mistaken assumption on my part considering that he worked with a large cabal of jews,
I agree -- but absent a German declaration of war on the United States, wouldn't the Roosevelt Administration have had a harder time keeping the American people from focusing on Japan?
War with the United States was inevitable, especially after the Japanese attack. The US gov was “neutral in name only.
FDR had plotted war with Germany since well before the war in Europe even started. Roosevelt’s campaign of deception and outright lies were aimed at getting the United States to intervene in the Second World War prior to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in December 1941 because the jews controlled FDR, and they wanted the US to go to war with Hitler. Lend-lease policies to both Great Britain and Joseph Stalin after the Invasion of the Soviet Union, loaning destroyers to Britain help fight the Battle of the Atlantic are just some of the US gov provocations.
American aggression against German U-boats, despite their best efforts not to attack American ships, was such a problem that many high-ranking officers in the Kriegsmarine applauded the decision to declare war. With 8 years of manipulations under their belt, FDR and his jews were never going to let Hitler avoid a war with them.
Fine; but absent Germany declaring war first, to what extent could the Roosevelt administration et al have gotten away with making Germany the priority?As it was, they put over 'Germany first.' What if it had been 'Japan first, and yeah, yeah, yeah -- we'll get to Germany. Make sure Britain stays in the game, and maybe bomb Hamburg or something. But on to Tokyo.'
'...FDR and his jews were never going to let Hitler avoid a war with them...'
Hitler a psychopath? Hardly. The fact of the matter is, Germany was not the perpetrator of World War I nor World War II, but instead, was the victim of Allied aggression in both wars. Hitler never wanted the war but war was forced on Germany by World Jewry. War was declared by Britain and France, Britain, mainly, which had been maneuvering for any pretext to declare that war. What did you expect Hitler to do once war was declared? Lay down their arms and allow the ALL-LIES to plunder the German homeland? Anyone with a desire to find the truth ought to be able to see the lie in blaming Hitler for WW2. Once war had been declared on Germany, Hitler’s foreign policy was thereby forced to shift radically to one of maneuverings to win the war. To expect Germany to retain a peacetime foreign policy once war was declared on her is beyond the pale.
Few people know that World War II actually began over 6 years prior in 1933 with World Jewry themselves declaring economic warfare on Germany, but of course that very key issue has always been suppressed from history. It is also a key fact that these same jew criminals wanted to prevent Germany, which became wildly successful simply by kicking out the Jewish bankers in the 1930’s, from becoming the beacon for other nations’ economic systems to emulate. These same criminals therefore baited Germany into making its September 1st, 1939 attack on Poland, and lo and behold got their French and British slaves to officially declare war against Germany just two days later.
As anyone who has firsthand experience in the racialist movement knows, it is common practice for the jews to attempt to discredit up-and-coming anti-Jewish personalities by spreading spurious rumors that this or that leader is really a jew, or a homosexual, or a communist, or a government agent.
To the false claim: “Hitler was jewish”, this slanderous conspiracy theory has been debunked by serious researchers and even mainstream, establishment academics, such as the British historian Ian Kershaw who wrote a bestselling biography of Adolf Hitler titled, Hitler: 1889-1936 Hubris. In the very first chapter Fantasy and Failure, Ian Kershaw thoroughly debunks the false rumor that Hitler himself may have had Jewish ancestry (pg. 7-9):
… [Allegedly] Adolf Hitler’s grandfather was Jewish. Rumors to that effect circulated in Munich cafes in the early 1920s, and were fostered by sensationalist journalism of the foreign press during the 1930s. It was suggested that the name ‘Huttler’ was Jewish, ‘revealed’ that he could be traced to a Jewish family called Hitler in Bucharest, and even claimed that his father had been sired by Baron Rothschild, in whose house in Vienna his grandmother had allegedly spent some time as a servant. But the most serious speculation about Hitler’s supposed Jewish background has occurred since WW2, and is directly traceable to the memoirs of the leading National Socialist lawyer, the Governor General of Poland, Hans Frank, dictated in his Nuremberg cell while awaiting the hangman.
Frank claimed that he had been called in by Hitler towards the end of 1930 and shown a letter from his nephew William Patrick Hitler (the son of his half-brother Alois, who had been briefly married to an Irish woman) threatening, in connection with the press stories circulating about Hitler’s background, to expose the fact that Hitler had Jewish blood flowing in his veins. […]
Frank’s story gained wide circulation in the 1950s. But it simply does not stand up. […] Hans Frank’s memoirs, dictated at a time when he was waiting for the hangman and plainly undergoing psychological crisis, are full of inaccuracies and have to be used with caution. With regard to the story of Hitler’s alleged Jewish grandfather, they are just valueless smear.
Here ya go. Enhance your rather incomplete jew list. Here’s a partial list, but not all of Jews who were directly involved in the Manhattan Project. There were many more Jews involved at all levels of research, building and advocating the use of the atomic bomb can be listed here.
Possibly Else Wagner was Jewish, and Wikipedia is obscuring the fact -- but I'd like to hear the evidence.Replies: @DICARLO
'...Klaus Emil Julius Fuchs was born in Rüsselsheim, Grand Duchy of Hesse, on 29 December 1911, the third of four children of a Lutheran pastor, Emil Fuchs, and his wife Else Wagner...'
War with the United States was inevitable, especially after the Japanese attack. The US gov was “neutral in name only.
I agree -- but absent a German declaration of war on the United States, wouldn't the Roosevelt Administration have had a harder time keeping the American people from focusing on Japan?
War with the United States was inevitable, especially after the Japanese attack. The US gov was “neutral in name only.
Yeah, and the good guys lost, no doubt about that!
Obviously, Hitler was trying to end the war as quickly as possible, and were he able to get the British to stand down, so much the better. Hitler was forced into a war he never wanted, and the jews weren’t going to stop instigating and agitating until there was a war. Germany was unable to win the war because of overwhelming odds with four major world powers arrayed against her, but they made a damn good showing. They were the “good guys”! No doubt about that. Hitler did what he could to rid Germany of the jews, which he did, but he damn sure can’t be blamed because he didn’t rid the world of them.
Well, that’s all well and good. But, that was THEN, and this is NOW. What, exactly, have the judeo-Christians done lately? Emphatically defended the jews. Christians are their useful idiots, and don’t believe for a second that jews aren’t grateful, if not amused. Jews are quite content that Christians are Christians, because Christian ideology is very helpful in the subversion, subjugation, domestication, and enslavement, physically and mentally, of their prime enemy, the White Race. The White race has become extremely weak and easily manipulated thanks to Christianity. Christian tolerance, generosity and compassion have been used to subjugate the White man. Christianity teaches weakness, forgiveness of your enemies, to live in poverty, to put strangers before your own children and is overtly homosexual, and this is very beneficial to the jews. Christian clergy are strongly in favor of homosexuals and transexuals and all manner of degeneracy that Christians had previously been against. But no more.
80% of the NFL in America is black, while their overall population in America is only 15%. It’s not because blacks are better athletes as many people have been indoctrinated to believe, but because of antiwhite discrimination. Those who control the industry don’t care if a White player is better. My point is, there would be far more White players in all professional sports if the deliberate plan was not to reduce their numbers, drastically.
Other reasons that jews have populated the NFL, as they have with many other sports with blacks is because it is much easier to steal a large percentage of multi-million dollar incomes from most black players than from more intelligent Whites. It’s obvious that jew owners, managers, lawyers, and agents do just that. Another important factor is to parade these black football “heroes” in front of our White women to further promote and normalize racemixing. Presenting a practically all black NFL is a win/win for the jews. It is all part of the jewish plan to destroy White countries and make them into violent, third world, banana republics, with jews sitting as effendis over it all.
“Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world; only to serve the people of Israel. Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap; and we will sit like an effendi [Turkish bossman] and eat. That is why gentiles were created. With gentiles, it will be like any person: They need to die, but God will give them longevity. Why? Imagine that one s donkey would die, they d lose their money. This is his servant. That s why he gets a long life, to work well for this Jew.” — Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, a former Chief Rabbi of Israel. Yosef was considered a major religious leader and chief coalition partner in the current Israeli government who enjoyed the allegiance of hundreds of thousands of followers. JTA the Jewish Global News Source 10/18/10
There is no doubt that mental and physical abilities of races are different, but when it comes to sports, it’s not so much the performance of certain races that dominate that sport, but the fact that Whites, specifically, have been shut out in favor of blacks, in the interest of political correctness and antiwhite racism. Certainly, American football and basketball are dominated by blacks. But it’s not because they more suited to excel at the sport physically. It’s because Whites have been discriminated against for a long time.
Major league sports are controlled by the same people who own the media. There is big money in professional sports, so who do you think is running all aspects of it? Who is antiwhite? While it has been overwhelmingly Whites who have been financially supporting the NFL for decades, the NFL, in return, has been quietly discriminating against prospective Whites tryouts thus, over time, considerably less Whites are willing to try out for the teams. Why bother? Those Whites foolish enough to try, are routinely passed over simply because they are White, and instead, black players chosen. This is the template.
As far as which race has the better athlete, there was a show on mainstream TV several years ago, American Ninja Warrior, where very difficult gymnastics were highlighted. Contestants had to complete a rigorous series of acrobatic moves on all sorts of difficult gymnastic apparatus, successfully, to move forward. It takes a great deal of body strength to excel in these competitions. There were thousands of competitors from all over the US and the World. Muscular blacks would fail, time after time. The sport was overwhelmingly dominated by many White athletes. Only a miniscule percentage of blacks got very far in the competitions. Their less than adequate overall strength, coordination, and agility to win in these competitions, let alone football’s requirement of superior intellect, proves without a doubt that black athletes are not superior at all.
And besides, let’s not forget the MASTER PLAN:
“We must realize that our party s most powerful weapon is racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negros. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause. —- Israel Cohen, A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century, 1912.
Voegelin believing (((mainstream))) lies aside, can’t the author of this article see that the very same group that was determined to destroy Germany, and has, quite frankly, which Hitler had no choice but to defend Germany against, are the very same tribe that controls the senile Trump and the rest of the buffoons that he appointed to his administration. The rule of idiots in America is exactly commensurate with the growth of jewish power in America. If Trump, or any of his buffoons doesn’t go along with the program, they will be removed, or worse. JFK found out the hard way.
Only in America do we take the demographic with the lowest average IQ, highest violent crime rate oand most unimpressive history and celebrate them for an entire month. The only demographic we don’t celebrate are the ones whose ancestors founded and built America. Another stark reminder we live in an occupied land.
I find no problem with your comment but I must disagree with your last sentence: Jewish Supremacism and his brand of Aryan supremacism were equally deranged.
Is it supremacist to believe that your nation will do it’s best if everyone who is a citizen of that nation is the same ethnic group? Is Germany for Germans meant to subjugate other races? Not at all. National socialism is not supremacism, Aryan or otherwise. It is basically loyalty to the nation state (which is your race) as opposed to loyalty to an international socialist multicultural movement or mixed race government. During Hitlers’ time in office another term that was used was “German Socialism” which was basically an early attempt by the NDSAP to demonstrate and show the German folk that national socialism was a rejection of Marxism and globalism as jewish; which it is, and certainly these are the ideologies which National Socialism was opposed to. Only those who don’t understand what National Socialism would define it as deranged.
National Socialists were not a bunch of non-white “haters”. They were more along the lines of simply being German Nationalist, and they wished every country to be as Nationalist, positive and progressive as themselves, no matter what race was dominant, to work within their own nations to achieve what was the best for them. Hitler even tried to help create an pan-Arab nation, not to mention his agreement with the world jewry to help jews get to Palestine.
To National Socialists, state and race are one. (nation means race) If you don’t think racial homogeneity means anything, look at China. This is what National Socialism was striving for.
Adolf Hitler’s National Socialists had no desire to control or exploit people of different races, They were a people who cared about their distinct racial heritage, and sought to protect it. National Socialist policy dictates that every race has a right to live and prosper in their own lands, by means of their own inventiveness and labor.
Is it supremacist to believe that your nation will do it's best if everyone who is a citizen of that nation is the same ethnic group?
National Socialism was fine as ethno-nationalism.
Adolf Hitler’s National Socialists had no desire to control or exploit people of different races,
“White” is a universally accepted racial terminology that commonly refers to White Europeans. Not all persons with light skin belong to the same race that I do. There are light-skinned groups that are genetically quite some distance away from the European White cluster, including the Ashkenazi Jews and the Turks. Fair-skinned or not, they aren’t “White”.
WHITE SUPREMACY is a system by which White men and women founded and built these US, the one-time most powerful and successful country ever to have existed. But today’s negative meaning attached to the term, “White supremacy”, has been created by the real racial supremacists, meaning their aim is to enslave all peoples not of their tribe, the jews, for the purpose of taking our homelands away from us, from we, the very people who made them great. The fact of the matter is that Whites, whether they prefer the term White Nationalist or White supremacist, have absolutely no desire to rule over other races.
The term, “White Supremacy” wasn’t always a negative term. The definition has been altered by our racial enemies to accommodate the anti-white climate jews have created to promote hatred for Whites. Over recent decades, the term, ‘White Supremacy’ has been twisted to mean that Whites seek to rule over other races. Of course, that’s obviously a lie. As any White person can see and know in their hearts, Whites seek only freedom and a safe homeland for their families.
In the early 20th Century, White supremacy was self evident truth that every person on the planet used to accept. In 1900 Whites were 1/3 of the world’s population and except for a very few backwards places we literally ran the entire globe. Everything that we think of as modern and noteworthy in the world was the product of White minds: trains, planes, automobiles. steel vessels that roamed the worlds oceans at will carrying huge amounts of cargo, great cities with towers reaching up into the sky, scientific medicine and industry. Humanity freed up so 80% of humans no longer have to toil in the dirt to raise food at a barely subsistence level. No wonder the nonwhites want to burn books, tear down our statues, steal and twist our history and culture and destroy our countries. Our very existence is a reproach to the nonwhites and their jewish handlers and a reminder of the simple fact that we are as a race: superior.
When the term, White Supremacy, was originally created, it merely referred to the supremacy of White values, which were based on both moral, and Christian values. For example, values such as, the rule of law, justice, honor, loyalty to Race and Nation, respect for moral authorities and elders, social order, honesty — keeping to your word, self-sacrifice, responsibility, courage, doing your best, monogamy, marriage between men and woman, such things as supporting the US Constitution, free speech for all — even those we disagree with, ensuring the constitutionally protected right to bear arms and that a high moral standard is kept in order to inspire all races to follow that high moral standard.
People who believe in White supremacy believe in the preservation of our heritage and hold traditional views about race, sex and gender. These views are not only traditional, national and ethnic, they are also true, factual, scientific, biological, natural and universal. The embrace of reason, logic, and the scientific method. In addition, as racially aware White supremacists, we understand there is no such thing as equality; we are anti-feminist, anti-immigration and we hold traditional views on sex. We believe homosexuals and trans-sexuals should be treated as mentally ill or criminal. We believe in racial separation. We believe that both Christian and traditional European values should be taught in school. We believe that an economy should serve the people’s interests before the interests of multinational corporations and third-world countries.Those who attempt to smear White supremacy obviously do not hold these values.
These values are what the true definition of White Supremacy is. Today these ideals have been cast aside and replaced with degeneracy, egoism, and greed. All that is beautiful and healthy has been distorted into the ugly and noxious. Decadence in society knows no boundaries. It is plain to see that the nonwhite races find these high moral values which are common among White men, repugnant to them. But, of course, White supremacy is not about the subjugation of other races as the prime instigators of racial animosity would have you believe. If we want to find a race that is interested in, and in fact is, and has been, openly manipulating and subjugating all other races, WE LOOK TO THE JEWS!
Hmmmm...I wonder.
We believe homosexuals and trans-sexuals should be treated as mentally ill or criminal.
So, one fake quote or not, the many other quotes show that the jews wanted to force war on Germany. The point I made is that if it had been up to Hitler, there would have been no war. Not only did World Jewry desperately want Germany destroyed and even the elimination of the German people, but these two degenerate fiends, FDR and Churchill, plotted and planned together along with the jews for years to cause this war that Hitler never wanted. How can Hitler be blamed for anything? He did all he could in the interests of his country and his people, but sadly for the world, his enemies were too strong.
Roosevelt declared in 1934 in the U.S. Congress : “There will be a war with Germany” and elaborated, “In world politics nothing happens by chance; everything is planned and prepared for.”
Churchill said, “We will force a war on Hitler whether he wants it or not.”
On September 3, 1939, the day England declared war on Germany in a radio address, Churchill declared: “This war is England’s war. Its aim is the total destruction of Germany. Onward Christian soldiers!”
Germany lost the war because of overwhelming odds lined up against her. Hitler was forced into WW2 and and there was nothing Hitler could do to stop the jews from making war on Germany. To illustrate this obvious fact, jews reveal themselves, and their media, the press, in the following limited sampling of dated quotes. There are volumes of evidence, but these few statements and quotes by prominent jews and their organizations should illustrate the point conclusively, that Hitler, no matter what he did, could not avoid war:
“The German race has to be annihilated, there is not the slightest doubt about this”. — Bernard Lecache, President of the Jewish World League + LICRA, July, 20, 1932
Did you know: “The Roosevelt Administration has selected more Jews to fill influential positions than any previous administration.” — Brooklyn Jewish Examiner, October 20, 1933.
“The Israeli people around the world declare economic and financial war against Germany. Fourteen million Jews stand together as one man, to declare war against Germany. The Jewish wholesaler will forsake his firm, the banker his stock exchange, the merchant his commerce and the pauper his pitiful shed in order to join together in a holy war against Hitler’s people.” – Daily Express, March 24, 1933
“The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them, that will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business.”– Samual Untermeyer 1933
JUDEA, JUDEAN, JUDAH, JUDAHITE, JUDAS — AND FINALLY, JEWS
Yes, see how confusing it becomes and the jews have promoted and capitalized on this phonic similarity of terms, and pardon me for repeating what many already know, but it’s so confusing I need to repeat this in order to get it straight in my own mind. I’m certainly no bible reader and it’s all so confusing, thanks to hundreds of years of jew lies and further dissemination of these lies by the modern jewsmedia and by the jew controlled Christian churches of today.
You have these Biblical terms: Judea, Judean, Judah, Judahite, from the time of Jesus, and finally the term, “jews”. These jews, who have sought to control information for hundreds of years, and actually do control all information today, have falsely inserted themselves into the thick of it by instilling the belief in today’s “judeo” Christians that Jesus, himself, was a jew. Socalled Bible believing Christians, who claim they read their Bibles, can’t see through the ubiquitous jew bullshit, not that emasculated, jew serving, pulpit parrots in today’s “Christian” churches would dare preach the distinction. It seems that merely due to the first syllable of these words, which sounds like “joo”, modern day jews have fooled everyone to think it refers to them, when it clearly does not. When speaking of Judeans, these are people who simply lived in the province of Judea — not that they were practitioners of judaism, but this is the nonsense that has been perpetrated on Christians to confuse them. Same with the term Judahites, which were descendants of the Tribe of Judah — again, not jews, but mistakenly referred to or thought of as jews, and then the deception is complete.
During Christ’s life, very few of the citizens of Judea were decendants of the Tribe of Judah, who were called Judahites. Some citizens belonged to other tribes of Israel, but most were descendants of Esau (Edomites). Esau was the brother of the patriarch Jacob and became the ancestor of the people called Edom, or Idumea. The Pharisees are actually of the bloodline of Esau, known as Edomites. Esau left his racially pure Abrahamic origins and lived with the Canaanites, where he married wives from the darker-skinned peoples (This is miscegenation.). This was against Mossaic law which commanded it’s White (Adamic) adherents to maintain the purity of their Adamic bloodline. The Edomite assimilation into Palestine opened the way for their takeover of Palestine. The Edomites moved from the arid country of Edom into the more hospitable environment of Judea, an influx obviously encouraged for political reasons by the ruling Herodian dynasty. Edomites would have been appointed to the most influential positions, in order to extend and consolidate Edomite authority over Palestine and its people. For example, King Herod was an Edomite. He was made king of Judea by the Romans initiating the Edomite dynasty which ruled Palestine under Roman authority for over a hundred years
The Pharisees were also, Edomites (termed “jews” in the Bible only after 1776), which was the bloodline of Esau while Jesus descended from the bloodline of Jacob (not jews). Herod became notorious for his massacre of infant boys two years old and under,” a supernaturally inspired attempt on the life of Christ (Matthew 2:16). Those few Judahites living in Judea joined with the Edomite majority and became followers of the hybrid religion of Pharisaism developed during the captivity in Babylon. Pharisaism is not the Law of Moses, Mossaic Law was the religion that Jesus Christ taught. It is the religion of the Talmud which is called Judaism today; it was condemned by Christ, since it is the antithesis of the Mosaic Law and the prophets. For His crusade to upend this religion of evil, the Pharisees — the jews! — demanded Christ be executed.
The point is that one who is labelled a “Jew” in current printings of the Bible, is not necessarily a chosen man of God, a follower of Moses and the prophets, a member of the tribe of Judah, an Israelite, or even a Semite, but one who is a resident of Judea, with no reference to any religion. A Judean, is simply a person from Judea. But a well-organized and well-financed international “pressure group”, world jewry, created a “secondary meaning” for the relatively new word “Jew”, that implies it pertains to the people of today who call themselves jews, which is not the understanding intended by the Scripture. Those who call themselves jews today falsely imply they are somehow descendants of the tribes of Israel and chosen of God. Yet they are obviously not “Judeans,” or residents of Judea.
By the time of Jesus the word Edom or Edomite had been translated by Greek and Latin into Ioudaios and Iudaeus meaning a Judean or person living in Judea. The original King James version of the Bible, 1611, translated Idumaean-Judean into ‘iewes’. It wasn’t until the revised editions of the King James Bible in the 18th Century, that the word Jew first appeared. The word Jew does not mean Israel or Israelite. Loudaios Greek: Ioudaioi) is a Greek ethnonym used in classical and biblical literature which commonly translates to “Jew” or “Judean”, each meaning someone from Judea. In its various meanings, the word has also been translated as “Judahites”, “people of the region of Judah/Judea” (Greek: ??da?a) and “leaders of Judea”. (all you ever wanted to know about the origins of the word, “jew”: http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/jew.htm )
In the Bible, neither Adam, Seth nor Noah are called “jew”. Nor were Abraham, Isaac or Jacob (Israel) called “jew”. Moses was not called a jew, and neither was David or his son Solomon called a jew. In fact, you will NOT find the term “jew” in the first ELEVEN books of the Bible! The first time “jews” are mentioned in the parchments, is in 2 Kings 16:6, and then only in translations revised in the 18th century. In 2 Kings, chapter 16, you will find that Jacob/Israel was at war with the “jews” and drove the “jews” from Elath. All must simply take some time to look at their Bibles to see the deception. Another key issue that modern “Christians” (I use quotes because most of them worship today’s jews, not Christ) fail to understand is that the term “Israel” in the bible, never referred to a place or to the jews of today or jews at all, just as the term Israelites, does not refer to jews.
Jesus, of course, was not a jew, nor was he a practitioner of judaism or even a Judean, nor was he a resident of Judea. Jesus of Nazareth was a Galilean or a resident of Galilee (Matthew 26:69; John 7:41). Again, Jesus was not a jew, he was a Judahite, a member of the Tribe of Judah, who were not “jews”, and has nothing to do with those Talmudists who call themselves jews today. The word merely sounds similar, and jews have used that deception to claim they are Judahites, which again, they are not. They are Edomites, which are decendants of Jacob’s brother, Esau. A Judahite is simply a descendent of the Tribe of Judah and Judah was one of the twelve sons of Jacob (also referred to by the name: Israel), each of which was the patriarch of their own tribe, hence, the 12 TRIBES *ISRAEL meaning the 12 Tribes of *Jacob. This very same patriarch, Jacob, was renamed Israel.
Take note that the Bible refers to Jacob as both Jacob and Israel even after his renaming most of the time. Hence, when Jesus was quoted in the Bible as saying, “I was only sent to the lost sheep of the House of Israel” (Matthew 15:24), he wasn’t talking about either the jews in the Middle East of today, or the Pharisaic priests of his day, or the modern day country of Israel. He was talking about the descendants of Jacob / Israel, the twelve tribes. So this is another term, “Israel” or perhaps, “Israelite”, the deceptive jews have taken and changed the modern meaning of to refer to themselves, when it does not — thus due to indoctrination and the willful ignorance of today’s Christians and their leaders, confusion reigns. Now we understand why the decendants of Khazars chose the deception to call themselves “jews” and to further deceive Christians, to call their nerve center of evil, “Israel”.
America saw a record 691 mass shootings in 2021, and shockingly, ZERO attacks by so called, “White Supremacists”. None of these attacks had a White racial or terroristic motive. Meanwhile, the jewsmedia and the ADL continues to drive the FBI’s crusade against “white supremacy” and “hate crimes”, even in predominantly black murder capitals like Philadelphia which reveals 562 murders last year. It might be interesting for some uninformed Whites to know that there is no effort by any White organization to subjugate nonwhites. The true meaning of White supremacy are simply ideals like honor, loyalty, self-sacrifice, responsibility, courage, discipline and wisdom — desirable virtues that White men and women are expected to possess.
Unfortunately, White supremacy no longer exists in any meaningful degree in America. These ideals have been cast aside and replaced with egoism and greed. All that is beautiful and healthy has been distorted into the ugly and noxious. Crime and decadence in society knows no boundaries. The natural balance has been upset regarding the perception of the family, a homogenous people, and life in general. Violent crime, sexual degeneracy and perversions, consumerism, entertainment, drinking, and an excessive consumption of drugs — i.e., everything that characterizes a modern, materialist society. Racially aware White understand who is responsible for all of this.
From the second:
One section of our country believes slavery is right, and ought to be extended, while the other believes it is wrong, and ought not to be extended. This is the only substantial dispute.
Replies: @Getaclue, @DICARLO
One-eighth of the whole population were colored slaves, not distributed generally over the Union, but localized in the Southern part of it. These slaves constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that this interest was, somehow, the cause of the war.
The institution of slavery did not end until the 13th Amendment was ratified on December 6, 1865. However, Lincoln had authored his own 13th Amendment in March of 1861, a month BEFORE the shots were fired at Fort Sumter. It read: “No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give Congress the power to abolish or interfere within any state with the domestic institutions thereof, including that a person’s held to labor or service by laws of said State.”
Why would the southern states secede from the Union over slavery when President Abraham Lincoln had offered an amendment to the Constitution guaranteeing the PRESERVATION of slavery? That makes no sense. If the issue was predominantly slavery, all the South needed to do was to go along with Lincoln, and his proposed 13th Amendment would have permanently preserved slavery among the southern (and northern) states which goes to prove the those Southern states that seceded did not do so to preserve slavery.
The problem was Lincoln wanted the southern states to pay the Union a 40% tariff on their exports. The South considered this outrageous and refused to pay. By the time hostilities broke out in 1861, the South was paying up to, and perhaps exceeding, a whopping 70% of the entire nation’s taxes. Lincoln’s proposed 13th Amendment was an attempt to entice the South into paying the tariffs by being willing to permanently ensconce the institution of slavery into the Constitution. AND THE SOUTH SAID NO!
The author’s complaint about the removal of information about the trial on internet sites, reminded me of the fact that, over the past one hundred years, even in the case of our public libraries, what rank and file Whites don’t know, and in fact, couldn’t even conceive is the fact that jews, individually, and collectively, have physically stolen most of our best books, written by Whites, or any book that exposed the jew agenda. Jews have hoarded them away from those seeking the truth or destroyed them. Today, most libraries are so jew-influenced now that they do not even try to stock the best White books and other materials. They are full of jew-written, jew-sourced books, with most of those jews pretending to be White authors. This is why jews are all over the internet, censoring, gate-keeping, and smearing Whites as nativists, racists, and anti-semites, desperately trying to stop the exposition of truth.
In the case of science, the infiltration of jews within the ranks of, and during all presidential administrations have shut off funding for work that could benefit our White race. Jews control all the choke points in government. Also, the jews have stolen and twisted/killed valuable White theories and findings. And the jew-controlled publishing industry simply buries or shuns manuscripts valuable to us.
Finally, most people get their information about books and scientific findings only from jew-owned media, such as TV, newspapers, and big websites including yahoo, facebook, google, the sites of big newspapers and magazines, and the likes of huffingtonpost, etc. The best output of our White race never gets mentioned. In the rare case when they feel it necessary to mention something that could be useful to us, the jews demonize it so that Whites who are still duped will not even try to find and read such things.
and
jews, individually, and collectively, have physically stolen most of our best books, written by Whites, or any book that exposed the jew agenda. Jews have hoarded them away from those seeking the truth or destroyed them. Today, most libraries are so jew-influenced now that they do not even try to stock the best White books and other materials. They are full of jew-written, jew-sourced books, with most of those jews pretending to be White authors.
Absolutely AGREE with respect to Jewish dominance of library collections and policies, and also with Jewish dominance of publishing, including highly-lucrative and influential fiction publishing.
the jew-controlled publishing industry simply buries or shuns manuscripts valuable to us.
This is incredible. What's beyond incredible is that they get away with it without even a whimper. How did America get to such a point!!Replies: @geokat62
.... what rank and file Whites don’t know, and in fact, couldn’t even conceive is the fact that jews, individually, and collectively, have physically stolen most of our best books, written by Whites, or any book that exposed the jew agenda. Jews have hoarded them away from those seeking the truth or destroyed them.
White liberals cry crocodile tears when the jewsmedia reminds them how White settlers stole land formerly inhabited by American Indians. But, the fact is, every people alive in the world today stole the land they now live on from a weaker people. It’s the history of mankind. Further, every Indian tribe in America at the time of Columbus had stolen their land from another tribe, and they continued warring and land stealing until the White man put a stop to it.
Of course they put a stop to it. Because they wanted a monopoly on all that. Same reason the White Euro Christians put a stop to Germany's "lebensraum" ideas. The examples are nearly endless.
Further, every Indian tribe in America at the time of Columbus had stolen their land from another tribe, and they continued warring and land stealing until the White man put a stop to it.
The author makes a lot of cogent and well-reasoned points, but his delivery lacks nuance and has a coarseness which suggests prejudice to the point of racism.
To be an American nationalist is also to recognize that more recent, non-white arrivals don’t belong here at all; and that while our blacks have been here a long time and some of them do sing, dance, and dribble well, they are mostly parasites who contribute almost nothing to the society except grief.
Oh, thankyou, thankyou, but it isn’t Whites who need to be lectured about being “racist”. Whites aren’t the problem. Whites aren’t the haters.
I don’t know. I thought it was pretty funny. Usually, the truth is funnier than fiction.
What exactly do you think they did?
Even the shitty Bolshevik WHO agrees with you that Sweden did the right thing.
The reality is that you'll get what you want. Because you guys lied about this and advocated doing nothing until it was too late, it can no longer be contained in this country. But don't pretend it isn't happening. Don't say "it's just the flu, bro" ... because it'll be the worst flu we've seen during our lifetimes. Obviously, hundreds of thousands will die now ... and all because you wanted to go out and play. Other countries disagreed and not so many will die:
All is Not What it Seems in Sweden
Contrary to impressions created in American media, the country's approach to the pandemic has not been so 'relaxed.'
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/all-is-not-what-it-seems-in-sweden/
Replies: @Robert Dolan, @ploni almoni, @DICARLO, @ld, @WJ, @Oldtradesman, @Wally, @Wally, @freedom-cat, @Epaminondas, @TRM
COVID-19 Projections Using Machine Learning
https://covid19-projections.com/
Contained? It never could have been contained. It’s the fucking flu!!!
Why not Anglin on Unz? If the Daily Stormer wasn’t being relentlessly censored by the jews and their girley-men followers, the Unz Report would be a distant second to it if even on the same page. If not for jew censorship, the Stormer would be the go-to site on the world-wide web.