That chart says blacks are 22x more likely to be shot than whites. But it does not mention who is doing the shooting.

Right.

This way:
1) They do not implicate blacks as being responsible for the majority of the mayhem.
2) They can imply that CPD is not protecting blacks the same as other races.

The “spin” is always to confirm the dominance of BRA ideology.

Note the dominance of liberal metapolitics:

The same is true of the brutality and genocidal intent of Zionism, and of the supremacist racism …

Liberals tell us that “racism” is wrong so suddenly commentators are against “supremacist racism.”

When White nations finally get their act together and remigrate third worlders out of Europe and North America, what do you think will happen?

Whatever talk there is about “peaceful remigration,” the third worlders will (mostly) not leave voluntarily. They will resist with any amount of violence. Look at this past year’s attacks by illegal aliens and their leftist allies against federal officers enforcing lawful deportation orders in American cities like Chicago and Los Angeles. What will happen when millions of third worlders in Malmo and Rotherham and Calais and Frankfurt and soon to be flooding into New York City dig in and fight back? Consider the ongoing migrant gangbanger use of lethal weaponry in Sweden, or the annual rampages of car burnings in France and other countries. Add in the thousands of military age “migrants” now in Europe, many with experience in brushfire wars from Africa to the Indus, and you have the formula for urban warfare with two, three, many Gazas.

Various European high police officials and military strategists (see David Betz) have already warned of a coming civil war, centered on uprisings in cities involving militant third worlders and those leftist allies. In such urban warfare hospitals will be destroyed, civilians will end up as collateral damage, aid workers will be caught in the middle of firefights and, yes, children will cry. And at this point, third worlders and their leftist allies will start screaming “racism,” “ethnic cleansing,” “brutality,” “war crimes” and “genocide!”

Then what?

Well, if this article is any indicator, the moment this screaming commences Western governments will raise the white flag and surrender ala Camp of the Saints. Why? Because too many people in the White world have already surrendered to liberal presumptions by employing liberal rhetoric. If “supremacist racism” is wrong, then by what right do White European and British nations have to expel non-white third worlders?

There is a long hard struggle ahead if White countries want to reclaim their sovereignty. This has to start with a rejection of liberalism and the creation of a new metapolitics.

Something to consider in the continuing chaos…

I see the defense is already claiming that Karmelo Anthony was acting in self defense when he knifed Austin Metcalf. Quite possibly the next move will be that some sort of racial slur was involved. You know the script.

Perhaps a Hollywood movie is in the works glorifying Karmelo as standing up to (oh horrors!) “racism.” Hey, he didn’t want to be the next Emmett Till!

Stay tuned…

George Washington … oversaw brutal military campaigns against Native Americans, is a heroic model for imitation.

I assume what is being referred to here is the 1790-94 US war with the Indians of the Old Northwest. Had President Washington not overseen these “brutal” (oh my!) military campaigns, the Ohio Valley would never have been settled and the USA would be confined to a narrow strip of territory along the Atlantic seaboard.

Is that what the author of this piece is calling for?

By the way, when in the history of the world has there ever been a military campaign that has not been “brutal?” Perhaps the author of this piece could inform us.

The uprisings that swept the nation triggered by the police murders of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor and Ahmaud Arbery not only decried institutional racism and police brutality, but targeted statues, monuments and buildings commemorating white supremacy.

Uprisings?
You mean the rioting of 2020 were part of an insurrection? If so, then the people who participated in them, as well as the organizers and those who still support them, ought to face similar charges and incarceration as the J6 ’21 folks.

As for commemorating “White Supremacy” – why is that wrong? White people built a great nation which people like the article’s author are trying to tear down along with the statues to great Americans.

And isn’t mob destruction of statues to great Americans, as well as looting, arson and assaulting people in the streets, “brutal?” It seems that brutality is A-OK when perpetrated by mobs which the author approves.

Incidentally, Ahmaud Arbery was not “murdered” by the police. He was killed when he tried to grab a firearm held by a civilian who had tried to detain him with reasonable suspicion.

The attacks on programs such as critical race theory or diversity, equity and inclusion as Stanley points out “intentionally distort these programs to create the impression that those whose perspectives are finally being included — like Black Americans, for instance — are receiving some sort of illicit benefit or an unfair advantage.

Maybe the author did not get the memo, but minorities have been “included” every since the Civil Rights Revolution of 1954-65. They have been the beneficiaries of very real advantages such as affirmative action, forced busing, campus ethnic studies programs, speech codes, corporate-government contracts, lowered standards for civil service admissions, a free pass when it came to the 2020 rioting, and much, much more. (See SBPDL elsewhere on this website for details.)

Like too many deluded ideologues, the author acts as if Brown vs Board of Education was handed down last week and he is nobly standing up to Bull Connor in the streets of Birmingham or perhaps marching across the Edmund Pettus Bridge in the face of the Alabama cops.

Memo: the Civil Rights Revolution put people of the author’s ideology into the driver’s seat in America over half a century ago. And we can see what a trainwreck into which they have turned this country. Cf: once great cities like Detroit, Gary and Newark.

The goal is not to teach the public how to think, but what to think. Students will parrot back the mind-numbing slogans and clichés used to buttress power.

Parroting slogans is exactly what DEI and the rest of the Civil Rights indoctrination system promotes in the classrooms, on the campus, and the HR directed “diversity” struggle sessions.

The policies of the current White House administration are the ones which are getting people to really think, and that spells bad news for the establishment and its PR flaks. No wonder they are throwing such tantrums!

The Left has been the main proponent of Cancel Culture:

Getting people fired for their politics.
Using mob violence against conservative speakers on campus.
De-platforming and de-banking members of the Dissident Right.
Let us not forget elements of the pro-Hamas faction engaging in criminal actions such as blocking highways and assaulting US Park officers.

And now the Left and its allies are complaining because of some karmic payback.

Oh my.

Question:
By standing in solidarity with Hamas, what will the Hamas faction do in return?
Will they support the First Amendment right of, say, Jared Taylor to speak on Colombia and to set up a chapter of his organization on campus?
Will they back up the Charlottesville ’17 folks currently being attacked via Lefty lawfare?

How about if the author of this piece asks some of the Hamas folks about this one. Be interesting to see the responses.

American university curricula remain predominantly Eurocentric.

Supposing a group of White Nationalists were to march onto campus to organize a White Student Union? And push for a White Studies Department which openly advocated for the interests of White people (ala the various minority ethnic studies which are a general feature of the university system)?

How long would said White Nationalists last?

But you’re not winning over anyone by encouraging war on the first amendment…

The response of the UV establishment to the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville demonstrates the university war on the First Amendment (literally, mobilizing their antifa street fighters, giving law enforcement stand down orders, and backing up the attack on the C-ville marchers with lawfare). Look at how people as milquetoast as Richard Spencer and Charles Murray have been met by organized mob violence when they tried to exercise their Free Speech rights on campus. And this is just the tip of the iceberg.

There are the speech codes. And “diversity” indoctrination. And “sensitivity” struggle sessions. And “de-colonizing” the curriculum. And mass hysterias over hoax crimes. And universities subsidizing openly communist groups (are openly fascist groups allowed to organize on campus?).

Take the well reported stats that the vast majority of faculty are left of center (no diversity of opinion here, comrades!). Or the public-private partnerships in which 3-letter agencies work with universities to suppress “disinformation.”

Point is, the people who are engaging in the war on the First Amendment are the ones running the show on the campuses. Anything which throws the university establishment on the defensive can be exploited by the Dissident Right … if it thinks this thing through.

The universities have been for some decades the epicenter for anti-White/anti-Western agitation and indoctrination. Ideologies such as Critical Race Theory have come out of the university system as well as the blue-haired cadres in the the classrooms, the corporate HR boards, the “diversity” consultancies and the soft-on-crime district attorneys offices.

The current Trump assault on the universities can be interpreted as an indirect attempt to undermine this entire system. The imbroglio over the Gaza War is the wedge issue for a wider purge.

It is simply amazing how many people who otherwise identify with the Right are now rallying behind the same universities which have promoted the agitprop mantras of “Diversity Is Our Strength,” “ESG” and “Abolish the White Race.”

The thing is for the Dissident Right to exploit the chaos on campus by demanding an end to anti-White agitprop.

The problem is that white elites refuse to represent other whites.

The essence of the dilemma. If anything, white elites subsidize non-whites to be used as muscle against the middle class.

The result is that white people are left on their own. The best they can hope for is the next election and see if this time around they can vote their way out.

A top priority must be the establishment of an explicitly pro-White activist organization. Sorta like the NAACP or the various Black Student Associations.

The Trump administration may be able to roll back some of the more blatant DEI policies (and good for him!). But Trump is up at the Beltway and the real struggle is down on the campuses…and in the streets. A nationwide White Student Association would be on the front conducting demonstrations, walk-outs, lawsuits, protests and civil disobedience (the latter if needed).

Forming such an organization would require some support. If USAID could subsidize various leftwing causes, then why couldn’t the current administration, or its tech-bro allies, provide similar to pro-White organizers? And while they are at it, how about some training cadres, attorneys, bail funds and invites to Big Name conferences?

The activism of the Left can be used as one template. Learn lessons from those who have been winning. And act accordingly. One goal: establishment of White Studies programs which glorify White people and train up more pro-White activists.

Today, White people in the USA are at a major inflection point. There is a real opportunity to seize the big victory if there is the organization.

If White people are so eeeeevil, then why do tens of millions of third worlders choose to migrate into countries dominated by White imperialist supremacists, Nazi-adjacent eugenicists, KKK marching segregationists, systemic-institutional racists and assorted fascists? Especially when they have numerous majority people-of-color ruled countries in Africa, Asia and the Caribbean into which they could settle and live liberated lives.

Perhaps it is because third worlders understand (unlike Hedges) that White people do indeed create superior civilizations.

The German slaughter of the Herero and Namaqua, the Armenian genocide [sic; conducted by Muslims], the Bengal famine of 1943 … along with the dropping of nuclear bombs on the civilian targets of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, illustrate something fundamental about “western civilization.”

Well, now, if this is the case, then I would recommend for Mr Hedges and his comrades to stop attacking the White world. Because when White people wake up (not “if” but “when”) the payback against the enemies of Western Civilization will be epic.

True enough, for the last several decades White countries have been more than generous in abandoning their colonies and in opening their borders to mass third world migrations. The result has been White people losing control of their own cities, third worlder migrants engaging in industrial level criminal sexual assaults pace Rotherham, perennial car-burning riots and iconoclasm, the prosecution of nationalists on bogus charges, the terroristic attacks on White farmers in South Africa…the enrichment just never ends!

But this situation is starting to turn. The rise of national-populist movements is the merest of preliminaries. Consider that during World War II Anglo-American strategic air forces firebombed cities like Hamberg and Dresden, the latter containing refugees by the way. Just think what will happen the next time around to those who are today attempting to dismantle the West.

It will not be pleasant.

So here is a great idea. How about if all those third worlders who are overrunning Europe, North America and Australia remigrate back to their majority rule home countries. There, they can find a world free of all the horrors of White Supremacy. Perhaps Mr Hedges can join them.

PK, good to have you back online!

Another rambling article trying to cover just about everything in the world but with a few mentionable points:

Such cases of black hostility aren’t usually associated with ‘racism’ but met with appeals for empathy with black ‘despair’.

Goes back to the generally propagated definition of racism as “power plus privilege.” And since only White people have both power and privilege, ergo only White people can be “racist.”

Of course, this definition is so much word salad, used to justify a series of double standards deployed against White people worldwide. The mere fact that this definition is accepted in academia, the media, the corporate HR offices, and (until Trump came along) much of the US government and civil service shows that White people lack very much in the way of either power or privilege.

Comes back to the fact that every other racial group organizes collectively for its own interests while White people are mostly functioning according to muh individual principles.

Notice that the liberals and progressives aren’t condemned by the ‘Red Scare’ narrative for having either aided or enabled, wittingly or unwittingly, the various forms of Soviet, communist, or radical infiltration/subversion,

“There is no enemy to the Left” as the saying goes. The Left understands the importance of unity.
This is something which the Right needs to understand and apply on its own side.

As communism was leftist, many assumed capitalism to be rightist, conservative, even reactionary, not least because leftist propaganda deemed it so. Whereas communism stood for revolution, capitalism supposedly stood for maintaining the status quo of oligarchy, monopoly, bourgeois privilege, and repressive/exploitative hierarchy, or so the communist camp and its cheering section in the West argued.

Back in the 19th century capitalism was seen as a revolutionary force, upending all relations whether economic, social or political. This is something which conservatives tend to forget. The critical thing is getting the Right to act upon it.

Well, video games are another front in the culture war.
Let’s see more activism on this front.

Trad programmers assemble!

Question for the pro-Hamas faction here: What are you getting in return for all the cheerleading?

Are Hamas-Hezbollah standing in solidarity with White South Africans under assault by the ANC regime? Are they taking to the streets to oppose the submersion of Ireland by third world invaders? Are they protesting the South Asian rape gangs in Rotherham? How about demanding freedom for the Charlottesville ’17 defendants currently being subjected to lawfare here in the USA?

Same old story. Fawn all over some third worlders while ignoring the ongoing assault against White civilization.

The self-deception is when you put destruction between double-quotes as if it had a debatable reality where as it is amply documented.

The reference was to use of the term “destruction” in the main article. Again, had there been no act of war by Hamas on 7 October 2023 there would be no destruction in Gaza or Lebanon today.

The real question now is: will Hezbollah keep bowing down, waiting for a better moment while the zionists occupy South Lebanon and kill and bomb in total impunity or do they plan to resume the fight and keep defending Lebanon and Palestine as Nasrallah would have wanted them to?

Not if Hezbollah keeps getting defeated by the Israeli armed forces. They may be able to pack a stadium but that is not fighting a war.

Pro-Palestine partisans launched an act of war? You mean those college students exercising their first amendment rights?

The same “students” criminally blocking vital transportation corridors in the USA? The same “students” assaulting US National Park officers and American citizens defending the flag?

https://nypost.com/2024/07/25/us-news/park-police-badly-understaffed-officers-pelted-with-feces-at-pro-hamas-riot-in-dc-union-chief-says/

FWIW, Israel began its war against Palestinians over one century ago.

The State of Israel did not exist “over one century ago.” Israel declared independence in 1948 and was accepted into the United Nations in 1949. Get your facts straight.

Let us note that after the First Arab-Israeli War Jordan held the West Bank and Egypt had Gaza. Did either Arab country give the Palestinians a country?

If not, why not?

Also known as America’s Golden Age [1776 to 1965].

That is so. Which is what the race hustlers cannot stand. White people built a great civilization in North America. And now the Crockett’s of the world are doing everything in their power to tear it down. Look at Detroit, Newark, Chicago’s South Side, Ferguson, Selma…

Well, perhaps the reaction that commenced with the election of Donald Trump in 2024 is part of a process to sweep away the race hustlers. We are in a new inning of a much longer game.

Stay tuned.

None of the “destruction” in south Lebanon would have happened had it not been for Hezbollah using that country as a base for military attacks against an adjacent country, i.e., Israel. Just as the destruction of Gaza would not be taking place were it not for Hamas’ stupid attack against a vastly stronger military power on 7 October 2023.

i.e., there would be no need to “resist” Israeli military actions had Hezbollah stayed neutral in the current Gaza War. Come to think of it, had Hezbollah not taken over southern Lebanon in the first place, there would be no war in that country.

But there is a real blindness among the pro-Palestine partisans in failing to understand these basic realities. They seem to assume that they can launch acts of war against other powers and then when the inevitable retaliation falls on their heads, play the innocent. Very similar to the howls of outrage among the Left back during the Cold War when the Rhodesian and South Africa militaries launched retaliatory strikes against marxist insurgent base camps in Angola and Zambia which were being used to stage guerrilla attacks.

The self-deception among pro-Palestinians is one of the reasons for there being little support for their cause in America. Can they really be that blind to the hard realities of war?

Well, yeah, they can.

In a hearing on DEI, Rep. Crockett claimed whites have never been oppressed in the United States:

Supposing there had never been any “oppression” of blacks in America. Let’s say back in 1776 the American Revolutionaries had freed all slaves, given the Africans the vote, banned micro-aggressions, and so forth. What would the USA look like today?

Well, what does Haiti look like today? Or Liberia? Both countries are black republics, both have been un-oppressed for two centuries or so, and how did they turn out? More recently we might look at the situations in Zimbabwe (aka Rhodesia) and South Africa to see what ending “oppression” of black Africans leads to. White people might consider their own fate in these un-oppressed realms.

Perhaps Ms Crockett’s hysterics are a marching example of why blacks were “oppressed” in the first place. White people of prior generations understood that “equality” just opens the floodgates to a tidal wave of race war, from Port au Prince to the veldt and on to Ferguson. Cf John Calhoun, Wilmot Robertson, Hendrik Verwoerd, Enoch Powell, Ian Smith and many more, by the way.

Trump and MAGA understand that politics are not just about running candidates for office every election cycle. It’s also about creating that mass movement as well as controlling the culture.

This is something which the Left has put into practice since at least 1848. Now that the Right has finally caught up, the Left suddenly finds religion on the topic. Consider this quote:

Writing at Salon, Chauncey DeVega complains: “President Trump and his MAGA Republicans and their forces are smashing American democracy, the Constitution, the rule of law, the institutions and norms. Trump has enacted over 50 executive orders since Jan. 20, the most in a president’s first 100 days in more than 40 years. Some of the most egregious ones are blatantly unconstitutional and violate current law.”

The Left had no problem “smashing American democracy” when it came to supporting every liberal president from FDR’s New Deal to Biden’s EOs mandating the DEI regime. The Left has implemented blatantly unconstitutional policies of censorship (speech codes, cancel culture), indoctrination (CRT), and political commissars (DEI “councilors”) from the campuses to the armed forces. And are Wall Street mandated ESG policies part of Our Democracy ™?

Let us not forget the widescale leftist iconoclasm in which statues, street signs and buildings of great American advocates of democracy such as Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson have been torn down in a spasm of Orwellian rewriting of history.

As for the “rule of law,” it has been the Left, with support of apparently state subsidized NGOs, which has made civil disobedience and criminal rioting into primary tactics (see the Summer of mostly peaceful arson, looting and assaults of 2020). And we might note the employment of lawfare and federal law enforcement against anti-Biden dissidents (parents protesting at schoolboards, Virginia Dare, the C-Ville ’17 defendants, the J6 folks).

What Trump is doing, in large part, is dismantling the systems of oppression implemented by the Left and especially the Biden regime. And freeing political prisoners (again the J6ers).

Now that the tables have been turned, the Left feigns outrage over the supposed violations of the Constitution which they have been doing everything in their power to trash for decades.

Let us see two, three many more MAGAs!

Big Lebowski did capture much of the anomie of the 1990s, that brief decade between the Fall of the Berlin Wall and the 9/11 attacks. Might also consider the line from 1999’s Fight Club:

“We have no Great War. No Great Depression. Our Great War’s a spiritual war… our Great Depression is our lives.”

Well, the 2000s saw that Great War and Great Depression. And it also saw the rise of the Dissident Right. We can look back at the world of Lebowski as the calm before the storm, like the 1950s before the 1960s. Now let us see the Dissident Right complete the cultural revolution of the 21st century.

Thanks for the update.

The rulers of all late empires, including the Roman emperors Caligula and Nero …

Caligula and Nero were 1st century AD Roman emperors (Augusti). The Empire continued for another four centuries, with the “Fall” usually dated in AD 476 with the dispossession of Romulus Augustulus.

These Christian fascists, who define the core ideology of the Trump administration, are unapologetic about their hatred for pluralistic, secular democracies.

And it has been the “secular democracy” of the last half century(+) which has led us into the path of globalism, open borders and repression of America’s historic majority under the regime of Wokeness.

Mr Taylor: whatever happened to Paul Kersey of SBPDL?

He was a big inspiration in the race realist movement.

Can we get an update? Thanks.

Trump is now in the White House, and the rapid changes underway are creating unprecedented opportunities for those on the right who want to reshape the direction of the country.

Agreed.

There will be opportunities to organize a pro-White activist movement in the open. What’s especially critical is gaining a presence on the university campuses.

And yeah, I know, Charlottesville ’17, but that may have been a premature street action. Too bad that many of the activists from those days have dropped out of the picture. Still, the operating environment is different today. Much of the public has been purple pilled if not red pilled by four years of Brandon, by the DEI debacles, by third world mass migrations and especially by Dissident Right meme ops pushing the Overton Window. Also, IT oligarchs are now lining up with the Trump order.

There are, as AA notes, “unprecedented opportunities” for those who have the will and skills to seize them. Time to take action!

Excellent analysis.

Back in 2013 NSA Director General Keith Alexander was booed by attendees at the Las Vegas Black Hat cybersecurity conference who chanted “Freedom.” The audience was largely composed of White tech people who still had that American style libertarian belief in Free Speech.

It just may be that one impetus behind the H1-Bs is to replace those Americans with compliant third worlders who will go along with the growing wave of online censorship. More so since an Indian who does not go along with the Regime program could face visa cancellation and it’s back to the slums of Mumbai or wherever.

All of the historic innovation in tech was done by white people…

Perhaps the IT Overlords do not want technical innovation, anyway. Consider how the invention of the Internet upended so much of the old order. Think the people running Silicon Valley or the Beltway want some even newer technology to come down the pike which might challenge their current rule?

So yes, import masses of third world mediocrities to maintain the current order, and de-platform any challengers.

They are not trying to run-up the GDP just for the sake of it, but because the future they envision is an internationalist and actually interplanetary future where their companies will continue on as players long after the borders between white nations and the third world have come down completely.

It’s the new techno-feudalism. The elites imagine they can survive the collapse of the nation-state by building up their own realms, whether in Silicon Valley or the final frontiers of space.

Well, maybe, at least until things disintegrate into mass economic collapse and general war. The USA still has some modicum of order, but the Pentagon’s Arc of Instability is ever growing. What happens when the chaos reaches Silicon Valley? Amazing, is it not, how so many smart people in Silicon Valley can be so blind to the reality.

So what’s the solution? It is really time for White people to buckle down and come up with some new tech to challenge the current overlords. And keep control of it for White interests.

We are in but one inning of a much longer game. And that game is not being played against China.

Jared, what happened to Paul Kersey and SBPDL?
Paul was a great spokesman for the White cause.

“Mr. Sellner covers “guiding strategies” which some on the Right follow, one of which he fully endorses. He also discusses numerous wrong approaches he calls “non-strategies.””

Martin Sellner is a great activist and a very articulate spokesman for the Austrian nation. But he is too quick to dismiss alternative strategies such as infiltrating the elites, forming “ark” communities and conducting info wars. These tactics may accomplish little by themselves, but as part of a wider nationalist movement they build a synergy which can pay off in the long run.

A lesson might be learned from the Left which mobilizes a full spectrum of movements and tactics to seize and maintain power. It’s long term strategy but it works. Let’s see the Right take notice…and action.

OK, so if voting doesn’t matter, if one should stay home on election day, then what exactly is the path to victory?

Stay home, be smug, watch more television and somehow the regime will come crashing down in ruin?

If there is a strategy here, then let us see someone here state it.

Feminists understand their choices in the Regime hierarchy:
They can either support the Party Line.
Or they can be relegated to the outer darkness.

So feminists gin up the usual ideological rationalizations for third world mayhem against White people:
“Toxic masculinity.”
” Structural racism.”
“The lingering effects of colonialism.”
“Traumatization from dealing with anti-migrant protesters.”

All so much word salad. But it maintains cushy feminist jobs in universities, NGOs and HR departments as well as 15 minutes on BBC.

Starmer wants to “wind the English up”

There are millions of White people who have “woken up” to the threat posed by mass third world migrations into the Western world. So why don’t they take action on this issue? The main reason is a lack of an organization which could mobilize them into an effective political force, from voting for migration restrictionists to boycotts to protests in the streets.

This is in part due to mainstream political parties (especially Conservatism, Inc) which divert public outage into candidates who push policies which have no relevance to the migration invasion (like cutting taxes or increasing military spending). It is in part due to state-corporate partnerships which repress dissent (via deplatformings and now in some countries arresting people who post online). And it is in part owing to the lethargy induced by the mass media in which mindless consumerism punctuated by sportsball becomes the chief goal in life.

But we have seen mass protests, notably in the anti-lockdown demonstrations, among the Yellow Vest actions, and on 6 January 2021 at the US Capitol. So the potential is there. Perhaps the rise of identitarian movements in Europe, and nationalist groups (like Patriotic Alternative UK), is a harbinger of the future.

But all this requires the support of an apparatus, a network of various national fronts which could act across frontiers to bring down the globalists. The creation of such an apparatus needs to become a goal of nationalists.

Think locally, act globally.

The continuation of WWI was inevitable by 1928, Hitler or no Hitler

This was the common understanding back a few decades: that World War I had settled nothing, and that World War II was its continuation and resolution. Effectively, 1919-28 was a two decade truce. The power blocs rearmed and then the global war resumed in 1939 (or 1937 if you count the Japanese attack on Nationalist China). It has been only more recently that WWII has been retroconned as the pivotal struggle between liberalism and racialism.

This is why it becomes trivial to argue about who “started” World War II. It really began in 1914 and to a large degree was the result of the continuing European politics of big power crisis and confrontation. There’s enough blame to go around.

In the end, the Second Thirty Years War (WWII) was settled by the USA and USSR crushing the Reich and establishing spheres of influence in Western and Eastern Europe, respectively.

Let’s say that after the Fall of France in June 1940 the British government had made peace with Berlin. Then what?

* Would the peace have lasted forever?

* Would Tokyo have decided to not launch its Pacific War (as it did in December 1941)?

* Would Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin have worked out a plan to divvy up the Eurasian continent at the expense of the Western European empires?

Nobody appears to be thinking this thing through. Instead, a Berlin-London peace treaty in an alternative 1940 is supposed to be the magic bullet which would have prevented the Decline of the West which is playing out today.

If this assessment is wrong, can anyone here provide an alt-historic timeline for 1940+?

But Hitler’s Germany was not a threat. … The geopolitical threat from the Soviet Union was also — or should have been — as great a concern to the British.

What is being left out here is the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact of August 1939 in which Hitler’s Germany aligned with Stalin’s Soviet Union. That is, in the critical year of 1940 Bolshevik Russia was on the side of the Third Reich. Add to this the Rome–Berlin–Tokyo Axis in which Germany was allied with the Italian and Japanese empires, both of which could deploy considerable naval power. Then there was the fall of France in June 1940, leaving Adolf Hitler in command of continental Europe with the value-add of Vichy alignment and the potential gain of the French battlefleet.

All this created a Berlin led geopolitical realm stretching from the Pyrenees to the Central Pacific. This geopolitical dominance is what threatened the Anglo-American powers. Effectively, Adolf Hitler had consolidated the Eurasian heartland, leaving the oceanic powers of the UK and USA on an ever decreasing periphery.

Of course, this situation did not last very long. On 22 June 1941 Hitler ordered the invasion of the Soviet Union, Operation Barbarossa, which reset the geopolitical balance. Which brings in another point.

How long would a German-British peace have lasted? If Hitler was willing to turn on Stalin in Barbarossa, would the same have occurred between the Third Reich and the British Empire? Perhaps due to a German attempt to seize British controlled Middle East petroleum fields? Or being dragged into another war by Japanese expansion into the Pacific and Southeast Asia (as occurred historically, 7 December 1941+)? Simply put, Hitler could not be trusted.

Much of this goes back to the increasingly suicidal policies of the great powers of the first decades of the 20th century. Too much was risked over (in retrospect) trivial border issues such as the Danzig corridor or in guaranteeing the neutrality of small countries. In the end, neither Adolf Hitler nor Winston Churchill could work out a general political settlement which would maintain the security of the European nations either in their empires or their own homelands. The result was a global war in which Europe was devastated and the post-1945 world order dominated by the United States and Soviet Union.

Something to think about as the 2020s appear to be sliding into another world war…

A very misleading statement:

[Xenophon’s] expedition miserably failed – and the painful return journey was endless.

The Greek mercenaries, to include the Athenian Xenophon, had been hired by Cyrus the Younger in a civil war to contest the kingship of the Persian Empire against Artaxerxes. Cyrus’ army actually won the battle at Cunaxa in September 401 BC but Cyrus himself was killed in the fighting. This left Artaxerxes as king and the mercenaries in a bind. The ensuing “Retreat of the 10,000” was an epic two-year (not “endless”) march through hostile territory, with Xenophon leading the mercenaries back to Greek colonies on the Black Sea.

One thing which the Anabasis demonstrated was that the Persian Empire was open to conquest by a determined and well led force. Alexander of Macedon demonstrated this reality later in the 4th century BC.

It’s worth reading Xenophon’s Anabasis, available in many popular editions, for lessons learned on how a small but well led Western army can take on any number of foes.

Something to consider in the continuing chaos, abroad and at home…

Crassus decided to invade neighboring Parthia, which is today Turkey and Iran.

Actually, Parthia encompassed Iraq and Iran and some adjoining regions, not Turkey (Anatolia). And Trump, unlike Crassus, did not in his first term march an army into Mesopotamia to disaster, though both men were real estate magnates.

Nonetheless, the overall point of the article has some validity. Looks like the Biden regime is trying to provoke a bigger war over Ukraine on the way out. But then again, wasn’t Biden the most popular president in the history of the world?

Note, please, that the Left has largely been in support of the Democratic Party. Often, the same people who complain the loudest about the Military Industrial Complex are also the ones who keep returning its minions to power.

World War III is a small price to pay for no mean Tweets!

Even if Hamas could somehow pull off a victory against the IDF, how does that benefit White people under siege worldwide?

What is the Hamas position on the ongoing migrant invasion of Europe? Or the attacks on Boer farmers in South Africa? Or the regime’s swamping of US Rustbelt towns with third-fourth worlders? Is Hamas going to stand in solidarity with nationalists who are rotting away in jail across Europe for opposing the migration-invasion?

Has anyone bothered to sit down with Hamas reps and asked them these questions?

Slaughter of women, children, and other non-combatants is not war.

Again, in virtually every war in history the majority of casualties have been civilians. Check out the bombings of Rotterdam, Hamburg and Tokyo in World War II, or city fights like Stalingrad and Manila.

Or consider the mutual mayhem being visited upon Russian and Ukrainian civilians in the current war for Eurasia. Apparently, the slaughter of thousands of White people, and the devastation of ancient European cities from the Donbas to points west, does not generate a fraction of the outrage compared to a fight among third world peoples.

Amazing!

What you mischaracterize as purely emotional reaction has, in fact, led to the following:

And none of these things has changed anything on the ground in Gaza or south Lebanon. The IDF continues its offensives while the pro-Hamas faction continues to clutch its pearls.

It gets back to the failure of the Palestinians to learn anything from almost eight decades of fighting the Israelis. Learning lessons from history and then applying them is how you win wars. This is something the Dissident Right needs to understand, but too many people here are more interested in raging online than developing winning strategies.

Let’s see some of the energies being expended here in support of third worlders being instead applied to establishing a White advocacy movement in Europe and America.

Well over a year into the Gaza War and we still hear the same broken record of whining and pearl clutching:

Israeli war crimes!
Slaughter in Gaza!
Children are crying!
Wah!

Has any of this gnashing of teeth and rending of garments changed anything? Nope. The Gaza War continues while the Hamas partisans are increasingly made to look totally helpless, unable to do anything to materially stop the IDF offensive. Posting the daily outrage on distant websites does not count.

None of the mayhem in Gaza (and now south Lebanon) would be happening had Hamas decided to not launch its stupid attack against Israel on 7 October 2023. Yes, stupid. You attack a neighboring country which is stronger than you and when the inevitable blowback occurs in full living color in your front yard, you suddenly discover that in wars people get killed and, as with most wars in history, the majority of casualties will be civilians.

Something for people to think about next time ’round. Not that learning lessons is high on the priority list in these here parts.

As the man says, “War is the realm of chaos.”

Note the Big Switcheroo:

From the Brown decision (1954) through court ordered busing (1970s) to No Child Left Behind (2002) the big deal in education was integrated classrooms. Integration programs would solve all racial disparities in educational outcomes. These programs failed to deliver the promised results. Now in the 2020s, we are told by the race hustlers that we must have segregated classrooms to ensure educational success.

Of course, when the new separate-but-equal policies inevitably fail to produce the claimed results, the party line to rationalize the debacle will be once again: Blame YT!

Comes down to one thing: the genetic differences among the races result in different (overall) outcomes in performance. The education hustlers quite possibly get this, which is why they use education as a front to agitate, agitate, agitate. It gives them an audience for their agitprop in the classrooms as well as a permanent revenue stream to support their lifestyles.

The ongoing decline of American education will continue until either: (a) the entire system self-destructs or (b) YT says “Enough!” and restores some sanity on this front.

Count on it (using White people’s math).

Goes back to Left understanding that seizing control of the Means of Information is the critical strategy for the 21st century. The Right is still playing catch-up on this front.

Firstly, it’s as though they want us to associate their ideas with disgust.

Definitely. It’s a tactic for the Left to disorient and demoralize the Right.

The right needs to develop its own counter-tactics. Might start by glorifying aesthetics in art, architecture and physical culture.

Point is, the struggle is not just over ideas but also includes those aesthetics.

Agreed:

But before this can happen, it has to be envisioned; then it has to be discussed; then it has to be spoken aloud. Then it can be written. Then it can be done.

There needs to be serious discussions of how to establish a White ethno-state in the Americas, the form of its government, how to conduct population transfers with a minimum of mayhem, how to defend said ethno-state against the inevitable globalist/anti-White attacks, and so forth.

Consider that when the Russian Empire broke up during the Revolution and Civil War of 1917-22, a number of nationalities declared independence and defended themselves against the Bolsheviks. They could do so because in the decades prior to 1917 nationalists created viable movements to exploit just such a breakup. The result is that Poland, Finland, the Baltic States and (later in the 20th century) Ukraine seized control of their own destinies.

To sum up: what is wrecking the Western world is not memes posted by the Dissident Right on websites off in the information sphere. It is the deliberate policies of globalist elites and their minions. Whether or not the existing Western countries can continue to maintain themselves as multicultic dystopias is up for debate. But if they break up, then White Nationalists need to be in a position to carve out their own new countries.

The other races – everyone other than whites – is aware that they are members of groups and they act on this. Whites, ironically because of various genetic traits, have been convinced that “race does not exist,” and that it is evil to be a part of a group and work for group interests.

Until the mid-20th century White people did have a racial consciousness. And there was a massive information campaign to back this up in academia, the media, popular culture and among the general public. Public policy reflected racial realities: segregation (de jure and de facto), restrictive immigration, the mantra of “blood is thicker than water,” et alia.

So why did this change to the point that today only White people (mainly) have dropped their racial consciousness? Well, to some degree it was due to the massive agitprop campaign conducted alongside the Civil Rights Movements. The promise of a color-blind society and all that sort of thing.

It was also due to technical reasons. There was the failure of the pro-White movement back then to understand (and utilize!) the emerging methods of agitprop such as television as well as non-violent resistance. Pro-White advocates had every opportunity to exploit these same tactics but, being stuck in the past, refused to recognize the changes and reorient their own strategy accordingly.

Today, this situation is starting to turn around as White Nationalists move into the realm of information-space and social media.

Stay tuned…

Here’s a thought:

The current US regime subsidizes various Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) to facilitate the importation of third worlders into the Homeland. So why couldn’t a new US administration subsidize other NGOs to deport these same third worlders? And perhaps hire Dominicans as consultants?

Something to think about in the continuing disintegration of national borders…

The White worship of Africans goes back to at least the early 19th century with a faction of the Abolitionist movement calling for granting full citizenship to former slaves and freedmen. This worship has its antecedents in the 18th century Enlightenment’s glorification of the Noble Savage.

Now, there have been many Americans who understood this dynamic. John Calhoun, Alexander Stephens, et alia noted that either the White would dominate the African, or the African would dominate the White. Basic human psychology, the masses line up behind the strongest warrior. There is no middle ground of equality between the races.

Lothrop Stoddard, Wilmot Robertson and many more in the 20th century wrote on the rising tide of color and the need for White people to maintain dominance or else face subjugation. And this is what we have seen play playing out as the logical progression since the days of the Civil Rights movement to the current sanctification of a George Floyd.

What the article does not address is how White people are to liberate themselves. Will this take the form of the rise of a mass White racial consciousness? The development of an alternative pro-White media? Some catastrophic event which fragments the country and opens the way for a White ethno-state?

Be interesting to see some ideas here instead of the usual pearl clutching…

This:

All that mattered was that the Irish be on the side of the Global Good against the Global Bad.

It goes back to making abstract ideological concepts more important than the realities of racial existence.

Example: “Since ‘X’ is against imperialism, and I am against imperialism, then we are in a common struggle.” But what happens when “X” wins its struggle against imperialism and decides to go full imperial itself (which has happened numerous times in history). And then “X” invades your country?

This is pretty much the situation that Irish nationalists and by extension many more in the Western world are now facing. They confuse the abstract principle of “anti-imperialism” with the actual motivation of the anti-imperial forces. And that motivation is to seize power for their own racial group … this at the expense of White people.

One must ask — do these people truly believe Williams was innocent, or do they simply believe blacks should never be held accountable?

More likely they see the Williams case as a tactic to undermine whatever is left of the legitimacy of the justice system. Make it impossible to prosecute any black malefactor by questioning the entire judicial process. And feed into the mythology of America still being the grips of some mythical “systemic racism” against which all goodthinkers must agitate.

This case has to be seen in light of the wider move to stop enforcing the law: de-funding the police, ending cash bail, glorifying black thugs who got offed while resisting arrest. This facilitates the ongoing rising tide of color uprising which went into high gear over the summer of 2020.

Of course, there is an element here of racial solidarity. Williams is part of their tribe, thus only the tribe has any authority over him. Letting YT’s justice system do the deed is conceding power.

And power is what it is all about!

She also reminds us that this is not “apartheid South Africa.”

If the USA today were apartheid South Africa, then the country would not have escalating violent crime rates, crumbling infrastructure, open borders and race hustlers sabotaging the justice system.

Something to think about in the continuing chaos…

Is the UN’s new primary role flooding white nations with black and brown people?

Pretty much so.

The flood is part of the globalist elite’s strategy of using the third world to undermine and subjugate the first world.

Wouldn’t it be nice if all the people who oppose the Israeli war in Gaza were to turn some of their outrage against the UN and its globalist partners who are destroying Europe, North American and Australia-NZ?

While in the past the city has employed about 800 police officers, that’s now down around 400…

Ghee whiz, do you think that the movement for de-funding the police might have had something to do with the breakdown in law and order in Birmingham? Or local governments giving the cops stand down orders in the face of rioters who pillage entire city blocks? Or glorifying black thugs who got offed while assaulting law enforcement officers?

For the last several years the Regime and its media-actfront organizations have pushed an anti-police/pro-criminal line. And now we see the payoff in Birmingham and many other once civilized burgs where streets go wrong, shots ring out and aspiring whatevers meet an early demise.

Once again the question must be asked:
“Did Birmingham have these problems when Eugene Connor was commissioner of public safety?”

Enquiring minds want to know!

Demographic Warfare.

The Regime deploying third/fourth world migrants to replace trad Americans. And paid for by your tax dollars.

Well, perhaps more Americans will wake up as their towns are devastated by the invasion. The real dilemma is in getting the political leadership to represent them in this struggle. One more reason to continue the fight as the 21st century continues to disintegrate.

I will never blame my people for a healthy understanding of the other races.

Nicely and concisely stated.

Before accusing, one must never forget that the greatest crime in the history of humanity has been colonization by Europeans.

Well, now, if Europeans are the “greatest” criminals in history, then why do millions of third worlders want to migrate into European countries as well as North America? Aren’t they afraid they too will be subjected to all that European criminality?

Do these third worlders have some kind of masochistic death wish? After all, they could migrate to any number of Islamic or African states where there is no racism-fascism-Islamophobiacism and live out lives of paradise!

Of course, European colonization was one of the greatest glories of world history. Europeans brought many otherwise behind-the-times African, Middle Eastern and Asian peoples into the modern world. And what do Europeans get in response? Endless third worlder migrant-invader criminality, terrorism, rioting and victimology hustling, per the article.

What ingrates!

Well, New Yorkers do vote for candidates who hobble law enforcement while railroading citizens who save people from “maniacs” on the subways. Then those same voters ask why this sort of thing happens.

In fairness, we do not know the politics of the victim in the “lighter” case. At least she had the guts to say “no” to the alleged maniac.

Perhaps this incident will be (as the Libs say) a “teachable moment.”
Or something!

These horrors aren’t mainly (as we’re told over and over) the unintended consequences of the Democrats importing votes, or what amounts to the flip side of the same uniparty coin, Republicans importing cheap labor for the “chamber of commerce.”

Right.

The Uniparty is using the underclass as muscle against the middle: the flash mob criminals, the homeless camp outs on Main Street, the drive-by shooters, and now third/fourth world imports holding informal BBQs on your front lawn. These are the foot soldiers in an undeclared but nonetheless revolutionary war against trad America.

As usual the real question is: why isn’t there more resistance? The vast majority of conservative “thought leaders” seem to spend their time at book signing soirees or hosting carnival cruises to exotic waters. No leadership for the middle class, little in the way of organization, no strategy for victory.

And yes, Trump does know how to raise a ruckus, but he is only one guy.

Supposing they gave a war and only one side came?
Well, the answer is: look to Springfield!

Perhaps Trump will finally get the cat lady vote?!

Rall’s plan would work…once!

After the first round of home confiscations, people would stop building additional housing. Then what happens to the surplus population of homeless?

For that matter, why would anyone want to save up to buy a new house or condo when all they need do is claim they are “homeless” and move into a neighbor’s empty pad for free?

Until the last American citizen moves from the outdoors to the indoors, no one should be legally permitted to own more than one home.

So then third world “migrants” (aka invaders) would not qualify given that they are not American citizens? They’ll be glad to know this in towns like Springfield!

This:

The truth is that the Lewis case, conflict in Springfield, and most other conflicts in the United States are a “race thing.” Blacks tend to defend collectively even the worst of their race when brought before the justice system.

Note how when it comes to an African-American career criminal under the influence of a controlled illegal substance getting offed by a cop while resisting resisting arrest in 2020, the Regime agitprop industry mobilized millions of people into the streets for a summer’s worth of rioting.

But when it comes to a Haitian invader killing a law-abiding White person in his own town, then the agitprop starts singing “kumbaya.”

Of course, it is not a double standard. It is a single standard: that which undermines White people is Regime policy.

The basic dilemma is in getting White people to understand their own racial interests. And then act accordingly.

Supposing in the summer of 1939 that Warsaw had demanded that Berlin turn over parts of eastern Germany which had been traditionally Polish, say prior to the partitions of the 18th century. And supposing the Poles stated that if the Germans did not concede the contested territory, they would initiate a war which would result in the destruction of Germany. Would the Polish actions be deemed reasonable? Would the Poles be able to claim that if, say, Italy had militarily intervened on the side of Germany that Mussolini was responsible for starting a world war?

Supposing that Britain and France has not supported their Polish ally in 1939. Then what happens? Would Hitler have limited the German offensive to just the Danzig Corridor? Would he have continued through to the conquest of all of Poland? And exactly why would the destruction of a White (and generally anti-communist) country like Poland be considered to be a victory in the greater scheme of things?

Something to consider is that if Hitler had not invaded Poland, it is likely that the German Reich would have continued to exist long after 1945 with all that implies for the greater nationalist and anti-Bolshevik front worldwide.

And even if the “myth” of World War II could be dissipated, how will that reset today’s challenges to the Western World: the hostile elites, the mass third world migrations, the anti-White indoctrination, the lunatic “Woke” movements?

What is needed is not a single gimmick but a mass organization to fight for Western-White interests.

Something to think about in the continuing chaos…

This:

If “whiteness” were so psychotically powerful in Britain, he wouldn’t be able to criticize it as he does.

If White people were the genocidical maniacs that the Wokesters claim them to be, one might think that the latter would not be poking the bear as it were.

Of course, White people today are so pacified they refuse to take their own part in a fight, even when directly threatened with “bashing” and “abolition” by the Wokesters. Exactly why there is this refusal to face up to the reality is the key to the situation. Especially when up to the mid-20th century White people were quite militant in fighting for their racial interests.

Part of this is in the lack of specific organizations dedicated to fighting for White interests. It seems as if White people, or at least their elites, have bought into the egalitarian world myth, “Content of character and not color of skin” ™ and all that sort of thing. And the result is that other races, which do organize for their own racial interests, gain a de facto high ground.

Time for YT to wake up!

Once Neville Chamberlain (not Winston Churchill!) had given Poland the war guarantee in March 1939, any German attack on that country was an attack on Great Britain. If Adolf Hitler really wanted to preserve the British Empire, then he would not have attacked Poland.

Had the Chamberlain government not declared war on Germany in response to Hitler’s invasion of Poland, then the British Empire would have been discredited as a paper tiger.

But supposing that the British government had agreed to a peace deal with Germany after the conquest of Poland (October 1939) or Fall of France (in June 1940). Could Hitler be trusted? In August 1939 Hitler confirmed the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, allying with Stalin’s USSR. A mere 22 months later Hitler ordered the invasion of the Soviet Union, Operation Barbarossa.

Were there to have been a Berlin-London Pact, how long would it have lasted until Hitler decided to turn against the British?

Gets back to this: if on 1 September 1939 Adolf Hitler had decided to call off Germany’s attack on Poland, there likely would have been no World War II, no general destruction of Europe, no Red Army in Berlin in 1945, and no anti-nationalist purge in the aftermath of the war. And likely European supremacy would have continued both worldwide and at home.

Let us learn a lesson here: war is the realm of chaos.

Long before U.S. politicians gave their overwhelming support for brutal massacres in Vietnam to Iraq to Palestine…

As opposed to what? Non-brutal massacres? Perhaps the author can list some of these non-brutal massacres!

Vietnam, Iraq, Palestine, Korea, Afghanistan et alia were and are wars and in wars people get killed, buildings are destroyed and children shall cry.

And yes, there is a drumbeat of war propaganda these decadent days. But then again, we might ask whatever happened to the antiwar movement which used to be able to put millions of people into the streets? Perhaps today’s peace activists are on the payroll of state sponsored NGOs and universities, and voting for the party of the Neo-Con war advocates; Joy and all that sort of thing.

A “carjacking gone right” would encompass the following elements:

1: An oppressed, marginalized person of vulnerability points a gun in the face of the car’s lawful owner.
2: The lawful owner meekly hands over the car keys to the marginalized, vulnerable person of oppression.
3: The lawful owner does not report this incident to law enforcement because that might mean prison for another vulnerable, oppressed person of marginalization.
4: The person of vulnerability drives to their local university campus where they present a seminar on how they have been oppressed and marginalized by 4000 years of micro-aggressions like lawful automobile owners not meekly handing over their keys to carjackers.

Pretty much policy today in BRA:
Berserkers
Rip-off
Automobiles

How about if advocates for Free Speech networked internationally via social media and conferences to fight against censorship?

How about an International First Amendment advocacy front? It would take some leadership, and it would take some organization (and money), plus a legal defense organization. But it could be done, perhaps with an assist from the various libertarian groups worldwide.

Something to think about in the continuing cancel culture…

There is a tendency of comments here (and elsewhere) to spiral downward. Likely it is due to that combination of “egalitarianism, individualism, an addiction to comfort caused by soft urban and suburban living, and the pernicious influence of the news and entertainment media…” with special emphasis on the latter factor.

Let us also not leave out the dysgenic factor.

Which is why it is vital to keep the intelligent comments going!

There would be no Palestinians crying next to body bags if on 7 October 2023 Hamas had not launched its stupid attack on the state of Israel. The obvious lesson – that if you start a war against a vastly stronger neighboring power you will get your clock cleaned – needs to be learned. Again.

At what point are we allowed to say that Israel cannot continue to exist in its current form, as a racist, settler-colonial state masquerading as the “state of the Jews”, and that it must be remade, as apartheid South Africa once was?

And since South Africa has been “remade” in 1994, the result has been the disintegration of that once first world country into a morass of infrastructure collapse, criminal violence and this world chaos. This includes massive attacks against White people via government sanctioned discrimination, land seizures and terroristic violence.

Let us note that the United States, Australia-NZ and Canada are currently being targeted as “racist, settler-colonial states.” Does the author of this piece propose that these White countries be “remade” ala the Rainbow Nation ™? If so, let us see him openly state this.

Somewhere out there Theophilus Eugene Connor is smiling.

Seriously, when you had the “Bull” Connors running the show, you had a disciplined society. No need for street barriers, SWAT teams, universal surveillance, and the rest of the panoply of the police state to get people to obey the law. YT was confident, so you had order.

Something to think about in the continuing chaos…

And please: don’t vote. It’s degrading at the very least, and more likely, you’re engaged in a ritual of signing over consent.

OK, so you don’t vote this November. Harris and the Dems sweep the White House and Congress. Then midnight 20 January 2025 your door is kicked in by federal agents ’cause of posting you did online. So you say:

“Ghee whiz officers, I didn’t vote in the last election. The government has no legitimacy and I do not consent to your kicking in my door.”

At this point, the feds will nod politely and say, “Golly, you are right, Mister Non-Voter, we will go away and you can go about your life.”

Right?

Or do they slap you in irons and frog march you off to federal lockup?

There is this bizarre belief bouncing around these decadent days that by ignoring the Regime, the Regime will ignore you. This plan works great until those feds come crashing through your front door, midnight sharp.

Right now British and Irish nationalists are out in the streets protesting the Great Replacement.

Is it too much to ask for some articles and podcasts supporting these people?

This “march” for Michael Brown is yet another example of how BRA (Black Run America) glorifies the criminal class.

BRA wants to mobilize the criminal class as its street fighting militia. So Michael Brown becomes an avatar to inspire more of the “troops” to get out into the streets to burn, loot and commit mayhem.

What we’re seeing here is another round in the war of BRA against YT.

Lothrop Stoddard called this one a century ago.

Do I have to point out the obvious: that had Hamas not launched its stupid attack of 7 October 2023, there would be no crying children, no weeping mothers and no dead fathers being dug from the rubble of Gaza. But rather than learning the obvious lesson – that when you start a war with a vastly stronger military power led by fanatics you end up getting your clock cleaned – the pro-Gaza faction marches merrily along with the same old failed strategies.

Let us note that the Dissident Right learned this lesson after Charlottesville ’17 and switched from marching into regime traps and instead went into the information age guerrilla route with online agitprop and shifting the Overton Window, pushing White Nationalism among mainstreamers. This was and remains the rational response.

But “rational” does not seem to be on the agenda for the pro-Gaza faction.
Learning lessons is also not on the agenda.

Oh yeah, if crying children are now the determinants of policy, then what do you plan to do when third worlder migrant children turn on the tears as future European and American White Nationalist governments start deporting them back to their origin countries? Halt the remigration and grant the third worlders homelands in Malmo and Rotherham and Minneapolis and the Paris banlieues?

Stop with kneejerk emotional reactions.
Start thinking.
You might just start winning.

Blacks complain about not being able to attend “better schools.” But this incident demonstrates (once again) that it is not about the amount of money dumped into the education system which counts, it is the quality of the student.

One might also think that blacks, who complained about unequal education under segregation, would take advantage of the seven decades of school integration since Brown vs Board of Education to “hit the books.” But instead, they have to be paid to perform the minimal task of a student – i.e., show up on time for classes.

This incident is one more example of the dysfunction brought about by ignoring the key factor in civilization: race.

Oh yeah: did Birmingham have to pay students to attend public schools back when Eugene Connor was Commissioner of Public Safety?

All nationalists, patriots and members of the Dissident Right need to stand in solidarity with the protesters in Britain in particular and the White world in general who are fighting against the tidal wave of third world invaders.

And also stand against the globalist string pullers who are behind the invasion. We are at a historical nexus. Let’s run with it!

How about if the Dissident Right organizes a total boycott of the next Olympics? Instead, promote an Alternative Olympics which promote nationalism.

Let’s also see support for the English and Irish and everyone else fighting against the Great Replacement.

Here’s an idea: how about if the Dissident Right openly declares itself standing in solidarity with the White nationalists of England, Ireland, Austria, Germany, etc., who are fighting against the destruction of their homelands by third worlder invaders and the globalist overlords …

… and then provide some practical support for European White activists by giving the nationalists platforms on their websites and podcasts.

The marriage strike must be directed toward a clear and simple political goal, viz., pulling the lynchpin of the matriarchal system:

Perhaps there is room for the Dissident Right (DR) to form an alliance with Men’s Rights Activists (MRA). Both the DR and MRA have a common foe in the cultural marxist regime (or whatever we may call it). Strength in unity and all that sort of thing. Together, DR and MRA could fight for mutual goals, say carving out space for activists groups on campus or getting a grant or two from some foundation. From there, ratchet up the agitprop.

There are lessons to be learned from the Marriage Strike. Like how to use distributed organization and leaderless resistance to affect social change. The Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW) movement also has proven effective in creating a cultural underground.

How about applying all this to a White Strike? It’s already half way there anyway, as more White men refuse to sign up for Clown World’s armed forces. Time to double down!

A DR-MRA alliance might take some effort, and it might take some finesse. But consider how the Left brings together groups as disparate as feminists and radical Muslims because of a mutual pursuit for power and payouts.

Consider other dissident movements which might want to network with a DR-MRA coalition. Think GamerGate.

A general strike via means of passive resistance could:
* Further de-legitimize the regime.
* Create the foundations for the DR and its allies to build an alternative culture and polity.

Something to think about in the continuing chaos…

It makes an odd sort of sense given the expansion of low-IQ demographics, accelerated by dysgenic social policies. On top of this, throw in the flooding of the Homeland with third world populations. The low IQ sector will cheer on anyone who is down at their level. Hence, Kamala Harris for prez.

This is why there has to be geographical separation with strict border control to preserve any kind of civilized society. The US used to preserve its frontiers. Today? Well, perhaps if enough of the GOP makes this a major issue, there may be a chance of salvaging something of the nation.

In the meantime:

Diversity
Equals
Idiocracy

Well, if Vance’s statement is an opening for White Nationalism, intentional or not, then perhaps the Dissident Right ought to run with it:

“Yes, we are White Nationalists. Yes, we are comfortable with fighting for White interests. What are you going to do about it?”

We are enlightened.

This is how apartheid works.

And since South African apartheid officially ended in 1994, white people in the “Rainbow Nation” have been subjected to state sponsored discrimination, terroristic criminal attacks, and seizure of farms which have been in their families for centuries. Not to mention having their cities trashed and their history rewritten to suit the diktats of the ANC regime.

The Israelis have learned the lesson of SA and are not about to turn over their country to yet another third world “anti-colonial” force. Look at the history since Europeans withdrew from their African empires in the latter part of the 20th century. De-colonialization did not lead to the promised land of one-man-one-vote, racial harmony and rainbows forever. The realworld result was and continues to be bloodbaths in places like the Congo and Angola.

A case in point is Algeria post-1962 where over a million French colonists were forced out of that newly independent country due to threats of death from the revolutionary regime. On top of this, many colonial era Algerians who had been friendly to the French were subjected to some really horrid deaths by the “heroic” resistance fighters.

Let’s also note that Australia, New Zealand, Canada and (yes) the United States are all considered to be “settler-colonial” states by many of the same militants who support the Palestinians. Britain, France, the Netherlands, Belgium, Portugal, Spain, Italy … all held colonial empires. What does the author of this article plan to do when his own country comes under attack by oppressed-indigenous-marginalized-peoples-of-whatever demanding the return of “muh land?”

That’s a real question.
Let’s see if we can get a real answer.

“A lot of people in the community feel like nothing is being done at all in that these youth are being arrested…”

Ah, the Youth.
The Unarmed Teens.
The Aspiring Whatevers…

Stroud said detaining a child accused of a crime is a last resort because of the negative effects it can have on the child. She said one night in detention can decrease their chance of graduating high school by 50%.

Of course, if the “child” were to simply obey the law, then there would be a close to zero percent chance of their spending one night in detention.

By the way, how many children are jacking cars? Don’t you have to be at least an “unarmed teen” before you are big enough to do a carjacking?

Enquiring minds want to know.

Perhaps Disingenuous White Liberals can be encouraged to move into East Lake? They can then see what life is like in a real Wakanda. Not that reality would penetrate their ideological delusions…

One can point to cities in America which are run by blacks and which have black majorities: Baltimore, Newark, East St Louis, Detroit, Jacksonville, Selma, Chicago (South Side), et alia. No YT to hold back African-Americans in such places. And how are these cities doing when it comes to economic advance, infrastructure maintenance, educational achievement, law & order, etc., etc?

You’d think that blacks, freed from the heavy hand of the oppressor, would have turned these cities into mini-Wakandas. Oddly enough, this is not what is happening.

Perhaps the answer is that owing to innate biological differences, the black conception of the Good Society is different from that of other races. For example, blacks do not see crime as a necessarily bad thing. Looting a store is just the foot soldiers of the tribe bringing back the booty and how dare YT intervene with “police” and “laws” and “prisons?” Same thing with gangbanging, drive-by shootings and mostly peaceful ™ pillaging and arson.

And there are the usual issues of lower median IQ, impulse control and so forth which makes it difficult for a large sector of blacks to function in an advanced civilization. The result is that they end up reducing every institution to their lowest common denominator.

Blacks are held down by YT’s laws? Defund the police!
Blacks are held down by hurty words? Tear up the First Amendment!
Blacks are held down by college admissions standards? Abolish the SAT!
Blacks are held down by statues of great Americans? Get your mob out and start wrecking things!

What it comes down to is this: blacks cannot share the same living spaces with YT, at least not for very long. Which is one reason more people are calling for a national divorce.

Something to think about in the continuing chaos…

Reed said. “We were blessed. This could have been much worse.”

Yeah, it could have rained!

Chief Allen Banks: “Together, we will stand strong and support one another during this difficult time for our community.”

Shots rang out.
Streets went wrong.
Senseless acts of violence.

Juneteenth: just an another day in Black Run America.

If, as Kennetta Hammond Perry and Kehinde Andrews claim, that black labor built the wealth of the West, then why has that same black labor failed to create similar wealth in Africa prior to and after colonialism? For that matter, why can’t black labor rebuild cities like Selma, Detroit or Newark?

Could this have something to do with genetic differences between Africans and Europeans?

Here is another thought before this item disappears down into the memory hole:
If Europeans are so ruthless, so exploitive, so willing to put down the boot on black bodies, then wouldn’t it be a good idea for Perry, Andrews, et alia to not provoke them by making absurdist claims?

Of course, the reason that Perry & Andrews can get away with their agitation is that Europeans since the end of World War II have been more than generous in their treatment of Africans. De-colonialization, foreign aid, civil rights, welfare state, sycophantric imagery on the telescreens, affirmative action sinecures in major universities which provide them platforms to bash Europeans…the parade just doesn’t end.

Time for YT to wake up and reclaim the legacy of our Civilization.

Will the American people wake up?

There are tens of millions of Americans who have woken up. The dilemma is that they lack leadership and they lack an organization to back them up.

The Tea Party (remember that?) was one stab in the right direction, but got subsumed into the futility of mainstream GOP politics. Today, much of Conservatism Inc ™ is involved in distractors like carnival cruises and carnival conferences. MAGA is closer to what is needed but has to go further. What is needed is (as they say in radical activist circles) an “organizational infrastructure”:

* Cadres who train up activists
* A dedicated legal defense organization
* Fronts for students, workers, artists, IT personnel, etc.
* Bail funds (very important in these dismal days of lawfare!)
* …and most critically, political leaders who will be up front at rallies, marches and demonstrations

Get a million people into the streets and onto the campuses every month and things will change in the right direction.

Eight months into the Gaza War and we are still getting the daily dose of futile keyboard pounding about Israeli military tactics.

Has it ever occurred to anyone here that this is precisely what the Israelis want: for the pro-Hamas sector to go into hysterics over people being killed in a combat zone, thereby further spreading panic and demoralization. Meantime, attention is being distracted away from the ongoing third worlder invasions of white homelands, the imposition of the ESG-DEI regime across society, the lawfare directed against the Charlottesville ’17 and January 6th protesters, and so forth and so on and etcetera.

Bear in mind that the Israelis have in the past proven themselves masters of psychological warfare. Stop clutching pearls and start learning something from this fracas about modern information warfare.