I find it a bit ironic that you are taking offense at what you perceive as an employment of an ad hominem “attack.” You sling insults continually….

In any case, is it ad hominem, or an insult/personal attack, it’s true?

I formed my opinion of Useless Idiot Pierre after a cursory review of his background/educational influences (which I accurately predicted, btw) and on what I read of his academic/intellectual output in the context of “power dynamics” within stateless societies wherein his conclusions were much more in line with what I submitted in arguing with you – “on their struggle against the state, on keeping their society an egalitarian one, however, they use violent methods: torture and warfare” – you, of course, withdrew from that particular debate.

I object to Pierre’s characterization of JungleMan as more authentically “human” and morally superior to European people. I object to his demonization of the conduct of European Man for doing essentially what JungleMan does, in terms of survival and propagation, but on a larger and more successful scale, with considerably less wanton savagery and degradation, due to a superior intellect and a propensity for extraordinary levels of organization and curiosity.

What would compel someone from France to travel to the jungles of South America to, apparently, find support for theories on Marxist/Communist/anti-Europa ideologies? What besides the deleterious influence of anti-European/Jewish philosophers and professors? Curiosity was NOT Pierre’s motivation, as far as I can discern.

I’ll stick with the honest analysis of The Noble Red Man by Mark Twain, who also took notes from personal observation:

[…] Such is the Noble Red Man in print. But out on the plains and in the mountains, not being on dress parade…he is under no obligation to be other than his natural self, and therefore:

He is little, and scrawny, and black, and dirty; and, judged by even the most charitable of our canons of human excellence, is thoroughly pitiful and contemptible.

There is nothing figurative, or moonshiny, or sentimental about his language… His “wisdom” conferred upon an idiot would leave that idiot helpless indeed.

All history and honest observation will show that the Red Man is a skulking coward and a windy braggart, who strikes without warning — usually from an ambush or under cover of night, and nearly always bringing a force of about five or six to one against his enemy; kills helpless women and little children, and massacres the men in their beds; and then brags about it as long as he lives…

<a title=”'https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/02/the-noble-red-man/

https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/02/the-noble-red-man/

‘ title=’https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/02/the-noble-red-man/

‘ >https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/02/the-noble-red-man/

The idea that natural science is the “birthright” or “heritage” of such people is just weird.

Dave? What’s going on here? You can’t possibly be this daft.

I said: the fruits and blessings of western technology/scientific achievement/culture is an aspect of her/our heritage/birthright, the geneses of which are inherent within us upon our inception.

In other words, tooling around in an automobile is the product/outcome of the imagination, labor, and ingenuity of Western/European minds and cultures, so in that sense, We, as Western/European People, “own” the harvest; we are entitled to it; our forebears “birthed” it and bequeathed it to us. Of course, the “harvest” has been shared globally, but it remains ours by virtue of the vessel of inception/ideas and resultant actualization.

Negroes, on the other hand, are essentially cuckoos when tooling around in automobiles; when they climb atop ambulances to twerk for the masses in the urban jungle, they are expressing something of their own innate ethnic heritage, and this is plainly observed upon viewing the abundance of video footage, recorded many decades ago, of ritual/ceremonial dancing of various African tribes. A twerk by any other name! ….lest you think I’m judging too harshly, Beyonce filmed a music video titled, Ape Shit, wherein a horde of Bantus, Zulus, whomever, were shakin’ it all over inside The Louvre – “Two worlds confront each other today.”

So, heritage, by definition:

2) a: something transmitted by or acquired from a predecessor: LEGACY, INHERITANCE, especially: the traditions, achievements, beliefs, etc., that are part of the history of a group or nation

b: an established or customary pattern of thought, action, or behavior

(3): something possessed as a result of one’s natural situation or birth: BIRTHRIGHT

Capisce?

1. I know you know almost as little science as Carolyn does, so you do not appreciate how socially and intellectually destructive science is

I understand precisely how socially and intellectually destructive science can be.

But, then there’s this:

The Oven Temperature, Scientists Say, Makes Cookies Bake Better Every Time

In a series of controlled bakes, scientists at the University of Guelph measured how quickly cookies changed in size, color, and moisture — data that helped them map the key physical reactions that determine a cookie’s texture.

A wee restoration of my faith in the benevolence of scientific inquiry.

1. In the unlikely event that you have any desire to read any serious books, you might try reading Richard Westfall’s classic The Construction of Modern Science: Mechanisms and Mechanics: from the get-go, science was an assault on all previously existing thought systems.

1. But I don’t suppose you really want to, do you?

1. Why are you haranguing me over an argument/position which I’m not necessarily submitting?

You’re all over the place, Dave. Chastising me for NOT viewing science as Carolyn does; Chastising Carolyn for her views on same.

Sure, Science upset the Indigenous Apple Cart (lacking wheels, of course – was it still a cart, then?) by denying “medicine men” the joy/terror of tossing virgins into a grumbling volcano to appease the angry God residing therein…what did Pierre say about the societal impact of the carving-out of beating human hearts on sacrificial stones in order to please the God who returned the sun to the sky every morning? So, was Science, from the get-go, an assault on the trials and tribulations of human sufferings and various machinations which yielded no consistent results for the desired survival/civilizational outcomes, like how do we feed ourselves when the Rain God is mad? Or, was it an effort to recreate/reclaim something that obviously existed Before?

At this point, I have no idea what we are arguing on, except for the pure sake of arguing.

So, again, Dave, how did specific forms of socialism manage to succeed in Germany and Scandinavia…

Those were and are capitalist countries.

The Scandinavian countries are what we call “social democracies,” societies with robust social safety nets and labor movements that check the worst tendencies of capitalism and limit the power of the wealthy in key ways.

The above is exactly how I described the Scandinavian/Nordic model as quasi-socialist, wherein free market/capitalism is the framework, but certain limitations abound for the purpose of constraining would-be money-power vultures like George Soros, et al.

In reality, the Nordic economies do not provide any support for the idea that relatively high levels of state ownership are incompatible with stable and successful economies. Sweden has 48 state-owned enterprises, Finland has 67, and Norway has 74.

The level of state ownership in Norway in particular is staggering, even after two successive conservative governments have chipped away at it. The Norwegian state owns the country’s largest oil company Equinor (previously called Statoil), the country’s largest telecommunications company Telenor, and the country’s largest financial services group DNB. This would be like if the U.S. government owned Exxon Mobil, Verizon, and JP Morgan Chase.

The national oil company, Statoil engages in commercial hydrocarbon operations in Norway and abroad. The State owns 67% of the shares in Statoil, while the remaining shares are held by private and institutional investors, primarily in Norway, the rest of Europe, and the USA. [Data from USAID web page]

NARINGS- OG HANDELSDEPARTEMENTET
Norwegian Ministry of Trade and Industry
The Government’s Ownership Policy

State ownership is important. It ensures that we have control over our natural resources and that important companies remain based in Norway. The government wishes to ensure strong public and national ownership. The state must be an active and predictable owner of important Norwegian companies, and it must take a long-term view. Through its ownership, the government wishes to ensure that the state contributes to good, stable development of business and industry in Norway.

Norwegian government white paper – NORWEGIAN MINISTRY OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY
Report to the Storting (White Paper) No. 13
An active and Long-Term State Ownership

Companies with State shareholdings manage substantial economic and socially beneficial assets. The State is an owner of some of the country’s largest companies in order to ensure that national ownership of key activities that contribute to the centres of excellence associated with head office functions and research and development activities remain and develop in Norway. This makes the State an owner of undertakings that are highly significant in Norwegian industry and society.

We are seeing an increasing trend for Norwegian knowledge businesses to be sold as soon as they achieve international standing. Norway depends on good contacts with strong international capital and competency environments, but in many cases, selling out means that we do not build up long-term knowledge industries and expertise in Norway. We risk undermining the results of long-term research and development, which are simply not reflected in short-term stock-market values. A better strategy must therefore be developed for ensuring national ownership of key businesses in the knowledge society.

All Scandinavian nations, including Finland, adhere, generally, to some sort of quasi-socialist governance as detailed above. It works well for the citizenry because of WHO the Nordics/Germanics inherently are as a homogeneous People.

Laissez-Faire capitalism it ain’t; (Germanic) National Socialism IT IS.

What? Snap out of it, Bumblebrain.

Dave’s correct about historical climate fluctuations on the planet. Warmer is good/better. Hot? Maybe not so much. Aren’t the continents supposed to have partially submerged by now?

Not to suggest that humans don’t cause extensive damage to Mother Earth – who, exactly, turned the Ganges, the Yangtze, The Yellow, the Nairobi Rivers into toxic cesspools? Having said that, at least the people polluting the Yangtze and Yellow Rivers will figure out how to fix the mess they made, eventually…

Unprecedented (inhuman history)monumental deluges and floods are happening across the planet

We were promised to Never Again! be destroyed by a monumental deluge…

the latest evidence for which is that mega-fires are destroying twice as much forest per year

How about a little gas on the Climate Induced Forest Fire Flame?

January 11, 2026 – An Argentina wild fire is burning Patagonia with over 5500 hectares already destroyed… thousands evacuated. Temperature fire? No. Arson, lit by Israeli ‘tourists’. Israel’s military strategy involving the use of fire as a weapon is primarily documented in its use of incendiary weapons, including white phosphorus and the recent deployment of a trebuchet to start brush fires along the Lebanon border.

In 2012, Chile arrested an Israeli tourist, Rotem Singer, for starting a wildfire that burned 11,000 Hectares of Patagonia Park. He was fined and sent back to Israel.

In 2011, an Israeli tourist was arrested after a major fire broke out in Torres del Paine Park in Patagonia. [Israeli tourists caught causing huge fires in Argentina in a forest full of natural resources, ‘The New York Post’ reports, December 31, 2011]

On January 4, 1986, the Argentine news agency Diarios y Noticias (DYN) disseminated throughout Argentina a report that Israeli tourists, disguised as backpack-ers, were surveying the El Calafate region of Santa Cruz province in Patagonia for the possible settlement there of 10,000 Israelis over the next ten years. The report implied that the project had been approved by national and local government officials. It included confirmatory statements by Albert Levy.

Right after the New Year [2026], hundreds of Israeli ‘tourists’ with ties to the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) descended on Chile and Argentina. The arrival is organized under the umbrella of an ‘NGO’ Mochileros Sin Fronteras (Backpackers Without Borders).

On January 9th, the fires started, engulfing huge swaths of Patagonia.

An Israeli tourist was caught lighting fires in Los Glaciares National Park, in the Argentinian Patagonia a couple of days ago.

THE JERUSALEM POST
By PHILISSA CRAMER/JTA
DECEMBER 5, 2023

Nearly three decades ago, Rodolfo Barra resigned as Argentina’s justice minister in the wake of revelations about his past membership in a violent antisemitic group.

Now, the newly elected prime minister has tapped Barras to head the country’s top legal office.
The appointment by Javier Milei, a far-right upstart who backs Israel and has said he wants one day to convert to Judaism, has drawn a range of reactions from Jewish groups in Argentina. The country’s main Jewish organization, DAIA, noted that Barra had expressed regret about his actions in his youth, while a new group formed after the election to oppose antisemitism called Barra’s appointment “a direct affront to the democratic and plural spirit” of Argentine.

Argentina has a democratic and plural spirit? According to whom?

December 9, 2025: Milei announces foreigners can buy Argentinian land and develop it after fires.

January 9, 2026: Patagonia is burning. Prosecutor confirms the fires are intentional.

So, there, Mulga – just thought I’d do a little stirring of The Melting Pot.

That actually is the ad hominem fallacy: Clastres may (or may not) have been an evil man, but that is irrelevant to the value of his book.

What? WHAT/WHERE is ad hominem in asking you to defend an argument? You referenced data from Pierre Castres. Am I arguing with Dave or Pierre?

In any case, where did I say Clastres was evil? I said he was likely a stupid, useless, Useful Idiot, due, in part, to his ideological/political slant against his own society, therefore suspect in his conclusions, which were likely formulated/imbedded by/in his disassociated Western European mind whilst he was still wallowing in the fetid froggy swamplands of French academia under the influence of who/what? So, let’s continue with our dissection of the Useful Idiot –

Clastres began working in anthropology…as a student of Claude Levi Strauss [J]…Initially a member of the union of communist students, Clastres became disenchanted with communism after the raising of Stalinism and abandoned the French communist party…Along with fellow UEC member, Lucien Sebag [a French Marxist anthropologist, Sebag was a member of the Francophone community of Tunisian Jews], he was influenced by the libertarian social group Socialisme ou Barbarie.

So, like Jewry and their magical 6 million! mumbo-jumbo, Castres, et al, were the jurors in search of the offenders for a crime/verdict (or a ridiculous anthropological theory) of their own invention/postulation.

I concede that all humans, to a certain degree, have universal commonalities, but this is true for humans and all mammals/living creatures. What was/is the point in analyzing illiterate human groups who, in the 20th century, still lived more like animals, or just a step above Homo Erectus, in order to better evaluate or proselytize to the People who built Schwerin Castle or the Acropolis of Athens centuries prior? In terms of the utility for the agendas of the Zinn/Boas/StraussPeople, the comparison of Europa vs. JungleMan with regard to civilizational development/progress is utterly ridiculous, and it’s malignant and subversive in intent.

Some people are animals, Dave. Just ask the wreckers in Bolshevik Russia…

And, again, you have made no attempt whatsoever to refute the fact, known to everyone, that government exists to steal from the productive members of society and turn the loot over to the members of the government and their supporters.

And, again, I have already conceded that this appears to be mostly true.

You keep denying it, but you do not even try to give a counter-example.

USA, prior to the ascendancy of the NutshellPeople; NS Germany; Scandinavia…

such as the fact the the Virgin Mary was of course not really a virgin!

We finally agree on something, Dave.

And I am denying that: “heritage” implies inheritance.

Direct/legal inheritance was not the implication; perhaps you should take your own advice and consult a dictionary:

Merriam-Webster – heritage

(1): property that descends to an heir

(2) a: something transmitted by or acquired from a predecessor: LEGACY, INHERITANCE, especially: the traditions, achievements, beliefs, etc., that are part of the history of a group or nation

b: an established or customary pattern of thought, action, or behavior

(3): something possessed as a result of one’s natural situation or birth: BIRTHRIGHT

1. In Marxist theory, 2. “Communism” is the final stage of history, after the dictatorship of the proletariat has succeeded in wiping out capitalism completely, 3. at which point we will have the withering away of the state. 4. Socialism, which requires state ownership of the means of production, is a transitional stage before we can reach true Communism.

1. Who was Karl Marx, Dave?

2. Communist regimes “wipe-out” capitalism? Do they really, Dave? So, you are oblivious to the Capitalist/Communist dialectic?

3. The ultimate goal of Communist regimes is to wither away the state? Which state? Whose state? By what apparatus does Communism ascend and remain?

4. Socialism, generally, requires partial state ownership and/or varying degrees of regulation of the means of production/accumulation of wealth. But, yes, I can see how socialism, depending upon its purveyors, can mimic communism (or vice versa), or as in the case of, say, Venezuela, it ushers-in a dystopia. So, again, Dave, how did specific forms of socialism manage to succeed in Germany and Scandinavia, whilst “socialism” in Bolsheviki/Stalinist Russia required tremendous capital investment/capitalist support; terror; starvation; mass executions; Gulags; elimination of the wreckers = intellectual/entrepreneurial class?

Was there a transitional stage of socialism throughout Bolshevik/Soviet Russia/Eastern Europe prior to the implementation of real communism?

ESCAPE FROM THE SOVIETS, TATIANA TCHERNAVIN, 1934

[…] my life is typical of the lives of thousands of educated women in U.S.S.R.
….None of us were hostile to the Revolution, and many devoted themselves with enthusiasm to work for the new regime.
But this did not save us either from famine, when we had no food to give our children, or from prison and exile…

The campaign of terrorism which began three years ago is not over yet. I do not know who may survive it… I want to tell the sad truth about our life in Soviet Russia.

Maybe you should read a book written by someone other than a theoretical expert. Not all of us need a credentialed meteorologist to tell us which way the wind is blowing.

they were always quite vague about how Communism would actually work.

Indeed. Communists operate by subterfuge.

Communism, far from distributing wealth, is designed to concentrate it in the hands of the world’s wealthiest people. And Marxism, before being a philosophical, economic, and political system, is a conspiracy for the revolution. [So, is Marxism real socialism? Are there disproportionate ethnic commonalities amongst the “fathers” of Marxism/Bolshevism/Communism?]

But, we’re not describing the general conduct/objectives of NS Germany or Scandinavia, are we? Particularly not so for that of NS Germany, as Hitler was rather outspoken on the objectives of National Socialism in Germany. There was no bait & switch with the implementation of same. Germany and Germans thrived in NS Germany (so did most Jews, btw, as evidenced in Shoah “survivor” testimonies regarding their enormous prosperity pre-war), and it wasn’t just local Jews who confirmed thusly –

THE TRUTH ABOUT HITLER, The Strand Magazine
, November 1935, by Winston Spencer Churchill

[…] then it was that one Austrian corporal, a former house-painter, set out to regain all.

… he has succeeded in restoring Germany to the most powerful position in Europe, and not only has he restored the position of his country, but he has even, to a very large extent, reversed the results of the Great War…but the vanquished are in process of becoming the victors, and the victors the vanquished. When Hitler began, Germany lay prostrate at the feet of the Allies. He may yet see the day when what is left of Europe will be prostrate at the feet of Germany. Whatever else may be thought about these exploits, they are certainly among the most remarkable in the whole history of the world.

************************************

“Everyone was unhappy with the Soviets. The communists were making life miserable. No one starved with the Germans.” – Agi Day (J – Budapest) in describing the transition from occupation by NS Germany to occupation by Soviet Russia.

Ultimately, National Socialism via Adolf Hitler was necessary for defensive and protective purposes against Communism/Marxism and Vulture Capitalism/Banking.

Not all socialism is a pathway for communism, just as not all success through capitalism is acquired through zero sum practices. I would say the Magna Carta and the Magdeburg Laws were the pathways for general European/Saxon inspired prosperity and the ongoing/upward trajectory thereof, which seems to have changed course due to the arrival of the alien inspired Revolution/Emancipation of the 18th-19th centuries.

Read some books. Read some books. Read some books.

Open your eyes. Open your eyes. Open your eyes.

the Soviets named… The Bolsheviks renamed… it is that form of socialism, as exhibited in Cuba, that mulga and I were debating.

Sure, “they” often use terms (names) meant to deceive the populace, such as communist-occupied East Germany calling itself the German Democratic Republic. In any case, you wrote:

But real socialism, of the sort that mulga was praising in Cuba, involves full state ownership of “the means of production.”

If “real socialism” entails full state ownership of the means of production, what, then, is real communism?

And, you wrote:

Socialism does not work. That fact is about as well-established as the fact that the Earth moves around the Sun

Except when it does, as it worked rather well in NS Germany and in Scandinavia – by “happenstance,” two realms which were free from masses of TempestTossedPeople within the populace and also free of inordinate Jewish influence/power within its government/institutions.

We have not somehow bequeathed the benefits of our achievements to people like you.

That wasn’t my contention, was it? So, you are arguing with me over a statement I never made. This sort of deflection is an observable pattern in your commentary.

There is no reason for me to defend Clastres.

Other than due to the fact that you submitted his work in support of an argument? I briefly looked into his “work” and I hurled, into your face, the immediately revealed/underlying patterns of thought/intention/influence, precisely as I alleged, regarding the recent preponderance of nonsensical European “idolatry” and promotion of primitive frog-gobbling/head-hunting/no writing/reading savagely violent peoples/cultures, and furthermore, I revealed a confirmation by Clastres on other assertions made by me with regard to how hierarchies WILL/DO establish themselves, and so you then just withdraw?

Unless you believe humans are meant to live as animals, then the hierarchies must be managed – and Dave, the established threat of torture and death for acting/legislating against a “mob of frog-gobblers,” who resist adherence to behaviors deemed beneficial to a group, IS COERCIVE.

I further argue that some human groups, such as the ones lauded by Clastres, et al, are/were meant to live exactly as they were “discovered.” They have nothing, really, to offer western civilization in terms of reflecting on the preeminence, or stupidly genuflecting, as is the current situation, of European Society.

Take the recent conquest of Venezuela

Do you object to the Belt & Road initiatives of the Chinese? Isn’t it in Venezuela, too?

The average IQ of Venezuelans is what, 88? The STEMPeople Nations are circling, Dave. The Venezuelans are sitting ducks…

The problem with government is that it institutionalizes, it guarantees, brutality and rapacity.

As does anarchy, Dave. Of course, the brutality and rapacity is not institutionalized; it’s just a random free-for-all, which is more difficult to isolate and specifically target because it’s not organized. That’s the enigma of (obvious) organization, isn’t it? The “organization,” in and of itself, is a strength and a point of demise.

Of course, you say you don’t support a total lack of hierarchy within a collective, so we’re back to the argument of how/why our beloved Anglo-Saxon Constitutional Republic, once very limited in power and scope, became the rogue behemoth it has devolved into. Remember the Nutshell, Dave. The answer is in the nutshell…

So, what does an unorganized society do about The Other organized societies of the globe when they come a callin’?

Government exists to steal from the productive member of society and turn the loot over to the members of the government and their supporters. This has been true for over five thousand years, and everyone knows it.

Do you disavow the Founding Fathers, then?

You persist in thinking that scientists have some special loyalty to our own ethnic group.

We scientists are “rootless cosmopolitans”: by your standards, pretty much all natural scientists are “traitors to their race.”

That’s ridiculous. Again, that’s not an assertion I have made.

Based on your commentary, I can reasonably suggest that you seem to be a traitor to your race. You do seem to fall into the category of a self-hating White man/unattractive LesbianLady flailing about under the sway of the MiseryLovesCompanyPeople and turning your inward ire outward and projecting your hostility and resentment upon the BeautifulPeople=EuropeanPeople, who created the world which enables you to project, without consequence, accordingly.

For obvious reasons, no society with a state ever has.

That’s simply not true.

Which stateless society in human history operated successfully by general civilizational standards? Let’s say “successfully” is defined by living beyond a mere/mostly subsistence existence, which would include the ability to accumulate territory/resources without utterly annihilating, through capture/violence/killing, all surrounding competition for same.

The biblical “story of Creation” is clearly a myth (possibly of Egyptian origin, not Hebrew

As far as I can discern, the biblical story/stories are tales of a reemergence of humanity and of the tribulations of those who were called our “creators,” who were supposed to have walked amongst us at one time, before/during/after some sort of global catastrophe. It’s not for nothing that nearly every culture throughout the world has some sort of Great Flood myth beyond the tales of ordinarily occurring floods.

Regarding the universal reference to “clay,” and for what it’s worth, one of my favorite proverbs on creation/dichotomous natures from Lin Yutang:

God took a handful of mud, molded it into human shape and breathed into its nostrils a breath, and there was Adam. But, Adam began to crack and fall to pieces, and so God took some water, and with the water, He molded the clay, and the water which entered into Adam‘s being was called Eve. And only in having Eve in his being was Adam‘s life complete. Woman is water and man is clay, and water permeates and molds the clay, and the clay holds the water and gives it substance, in which water moves and lives and has its full being.

I might have saved myself a little anguish had I recognized the inherent truth and beauty of this suggestion earlier rather than later.

just to be seen in the Light of Awareness.

You are farther along in the journey of abstract Awareness than I am or will likely ever be; I tend to deal more with what’s happening, obviously and covertly, in the here and now, and with what has been kept from us/is being taken from us.

The very (inexplicable) existence of Puma Punku; Longyou Caves; Giza; Petra; Gobekli Tepe, etc., indicates a past completely different from what we are told/taught. I think the gatekeeping of accurate history/truth/reality in this regard, and generally, is a factor in the ongoing machinations against some of us, and the lightning-rod is in Mesopotamia, ergo:

The invasion of Iraq begins March 20, 2003; a research team from the Bavarian Department of Historical Monuments announced on April 15, 2003 that they believed they found the tomb of King Gilgamesh, and Jorg Fassbinder tells the BBC that structures were discovered that matched with descriptions contained within the epic of Gilgamesh; the war ends May 1, 2003. For some reason, the public investigation/excavation of the site ended, and what, then, does Fassbinder say?

He says – […] it isn’t at all proven that our find corresponds with Gilgamesh’s under-river tomb… since 2003, all the archaeological sites of Iraq have been under a serious and growing threat. The lack of security in the country… The trafficking of… Art and artifacts are causing the total and irreversible destruction of archaeological sites by looters. All archaeological structures will be better preserved if we leave them under the ground, untouched and buried.

The same conclusion was made for Gobekli Tepe, without a war, of course. I don’t remember the excuse for halting excavations therein.

There seems to be a bigger (and older) picture, obscured from the mainstream masses, swirling around the reemergence of a battle for control of “Mesopotamia.” There’s something special/specific about the 33rd parallel, as well…

But, what do I know? I’m not a physicist! (Just yanking your chain, Dave…)

All that said, I think our instincts and inherent proclivities put proof to that unknowable/untouchable force that makes us who/what we are as beings. I’ve often marveled at what weaver birds can do without any instruction or modeling from their parents – it speaks to a knowledge/knowing that seems to arrive from the ether…or something like that. In this 12 minute oration, the lovely Neil Oliver describes something like that, and I share his penchant for the lands of ice and snow, for the very same reasons, it seems.

Take care, Carolyn, my Swabian Sister.

They were expelled because, for over a thousand years of darkness, Christianity imposed a viciously theocratic totalitarianism on Europe that threatened the lives of anyone who did not profess the lies of Christianity. And the Jews refused to accept the lies of Christianity.

That’s the reason — you don’t know this?

No, I didn’t know this. Thanks for bringing me up to speed, Dave, lol!

So, according to you jews were expelled from every place they ever lived because “they refused to accept the lies of Christianity?” Verdict: False!

Fact: jews were expelled in the pre-Christian period for virtually the same reasons they were expelled in the Christian period, ie due to their subversive activities.

Here are some of the more prominent Greek writers and philosophers who were sharper and more influential critics of Jews:

• Theophrastus (c. 371–287 BCE)
• Chrysippus of Soli (c. 279–206 BCE)
• Posidonius of Apamea (c. 135–51 BCE)
• Molon of Rhodes (1st c. BCE)
• Lysimachus of Alexandria (2nd–1st c. BCE)

These Greek writers and thinkers were mainstream intellectuals, not fringe figures. Their critiques framed Jews as anti-social, irrational, and hostile to civilization.

Here is a list of their more prominent Roman counterparts (mostly elite senators, philosophers, and historians):
• Tacitus (c. 56–120 CE)
• Seneca the Younger (c. 4 BCE–65 CE)
• Cicero (106–43 BCE)
• Pliny the Elder (23–79 CE)
• Juvenal (late 1st–early 2nd c. CE)
• Cassius Dio (c. 155–235 CE)

Several of these Roman authors explicitly portrayed Jews as subversive—not merely odd or separatist, but actively undermining Roman order, including:

• Cicero (Pro Flacco, 59 BCE)
He depicts Jews as an organized pressure group that intimidated courts, moved money abroad (Temple tax), and challenged Roman authority. This is an early example of the “internal enemy” trope.
• Tacitus (Histories 5)
Goes further than Greeks by framing Jewish customs as training for disloyalty—claiming Jews reserve loyalty only for each other and despise outsiders, making them incompatible with empire.
• Cassius Dio
Describes Jews as chronically rebellious, resistant to Roman governance wherever they lived, not just in Judea. He treats revolt as a recurring Jewish trait rather than a situational response.
• Juvenal (Satire 14)
Mockingly suggests Jews corrupt Roman youth and weaken civic religion, implying cultural subversion from within, not just separateness.

Goerge Soros is a bad guy. And he is Jewish.
Bill Gates is also a bad guy. And he is not Jewish.

While Bill Gates may not be jewish, there is overwhelming evidence that he is a shabbos goy who has been compromised by Jeffrey Epstein.

Quote from Bill Gates dragged back into Epstein scandal as new photos reveal the depth of their ties:

Melinda admitted that her marriage to Gates broke down because of his links to Epstein, and said after meeting [Epstein] one time, she found him ‘abhorrent’ and ‘evil personified’.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15399603/Bill-Gates-Jeffrey-Epstein-files-women-Lolita-relationship.html

So, Dave, all of your feeble attempts at jewsplaining have been easily thwarted and it is becoming clearer by the minute that you refuse to accept clear facts that jews have been a subversive element in their host societies for over two millennia (and not just lobbying on behalf of Israel’s interests, lol).

Doesn’t this suggest that you may be the cultist who refuses to see the nose on your own face, despite your highly self-touted STEM background?

And who is this “WE”???

Western people = European people. Even the MayflowerPeople, who apparently identified with the Exodus Jews upon arrival to North America. Have you made amends for your ethnic heritage, Dave? (I’m kidding…you seem a bit on the spectrum, so I thought I should clarify…I’m kidding about the spectrum (?)…)

You and Carolyn have contributed nothing at all to the progress of natural science.

? Are you deliberately obtuse or just so thin-skinned that you can’t help yourself by correctly interpreting or remembering what I wrote?

I have contributed in my own small way.

Thank you, Dave Miller. Now get to crackin’ on what to do about California….

Hey — how do you feel about the “Jewish science” of Einstein, Born, Pauli, Meitner, Wigner, Feynman, etc.?

Hey, they were all born in Europe, except Feynman, who was born in Anglo-Saxon America; of those born in Europe, they were all from/educated in Germany/Austria/Germanic nations, although Wigner was a “Hungarian” from Budapest, Austria-Hungary; he was educated in Budapest and Berlin – (László Rátz, of Austria, whose mother was a Danube Swabian, is best known for educating such people as John von Neumann and Nobel laureate Eugene Wigner) – do you get my drift, Dave? None of these noted scientists bounced straight out the shtetl, primed and ready to split the atom.

No one says Jews have no capacity to learn, especially the Ashkenazi, who have long intermingled and interbred with Europeans, particularly with the Germanics. What would the Rothschilds be without European societies, economies, and brood mares?

Feynman attended MIT –

William Barton Rogers (December 7, 1804 – May 30, 1882) was an American geologist, physicist, and the founder and first president of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)…

Rogers was born on December 7, 1804, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania…and was of Irish, Scottish, and English extraction.

A tiny, tiny fraction of English, Germans, Scots, Dutch, Swiss, French, Italians, Poles, Russians, Indians, Chinese, etc. made contributions to natural science. The overwhelming majority in all of those countries made no contributions at all.

That’s just about everyone, so who did, then? (Or, are you referring to the mass of (useless, according to you) individuals of the majority population, from which the revered scientists ascended? In other words, the efforts of a small number of individuals have actually created the modern world, and I agree on that point. If that’s it, then I assert the ethnic makeup of the tiny, tiny, fraction of those ascended individuals are what I said they were.)

On that note, Nikola Tesla credited his “useless” mother for contributing to all he was able to learn/achieve.

My initial assertion was that the most prominent scientists from the 14th – 20th centuries had ethnic origins in Europe, primarily of English, German, Scottish (Celtic) descent. Let’s choose just two technologies of that era, discovered or developed, that impacted the entire world – flight and the internal combustion engine. Go, Dave…tell me something about the ethnic origin and education of Nicolaus Otto and the Wright Brothers.

1. As I keep trying to explain, libertarian anarchists are not opposed to all forms of hierarchy or authority: 2. we are opposed to coercive forms, such as exercised by the state.

1. I absolutely understand this. I actually think we generally agree on the destructive nature of our current and ever-expanding American government and the deleterious proliferation of those damn NGOs permitted to operate willy-nilly. The American government has changed (devolved) because the ethnic composition of the citizenry, particularly of those in authority/influence, has changed (devolved). Open/free societies can NOT withstand multiculturalism, unless the cultures are mostly Like. Anarchy in a wholly European Society is unnecessary and unproductive. In say, (black) Africa or in the Amazon, rudimentary and primitive hierarchies establish themselves, and to European sensibilities, they appear mostly anarchistic and brutal. Can we reasonably say Anarchy reigns in the Congo? In Somalia? In South Africa, although they still have a European constitution/framework, yet they can’t sustain it…my point is, America is too far gone, demographically, to recover without an authoritarian force to rid us of or to contain what ails us.

Jewish/Israeli interests and proclivities are destroying us from within; the colored tempest-tossed refuse is destroying us from without.

2. Well, are you going to defend Clastres or not? Why don’t you tell me how a system in which any who attempt to establish order under a threat of murder/torture, by the masses yearning to remain unencumbered/savage, is not coercive? Isn’t that exactly what I said was very often the case?

Oh, c’mon — you’re kidding, right?

That’s not an answer, Dave.

The Nordic countries are what economists call “mixed economies,”

I know what they are; they are considered quasi-socialist, just as there are now recognizably “socialist” aspects to the policies of the American government, yet organizations like BlackRock are not permitted prominence in Scandinavian nations, as in America, as America is not, in fact, quasi-socialist – not for some, anyway. There are many forms/degrees of “socialism.”

Why does Scandinavian socialism bear different results than Venezuelan socialism? Scandinavians thrive; Venezuelans starve and seek to escape. It’s simple – Scandinavia is (was) comprised of Scandinavians. Venezuela is Mestizo. THAT pattern prevails – always.

Socialism really existed in the Soviet Union, Maoist China, Cuba, North Korea, etc., and it failed dramatically.

So, no particular ethnic component, or lack thereof, can be discerned amongst these failing nations?

But real socialism, of the sort that mulga was praising in Cuba, involves full state ownership of “the means of production.”

Real socialism? How about communism?

Do you ever read books?

Yes. I also speak to Scandinavians who tell me what it’s like therein.

Darn it Mrs Tulips, you write so elegantly, with such aplomb and authority. My hat off to you.

Glad to read you backing up Carolyn, who, it seems to me, is simply expressing in her own way the obvious fact that there is much more in life than physics, about which we need to think carefully. And, pace Miller, careful thought is possible outside science.

Glad also to read you starting in on Dewey. It would be wonderful to see a thorough demolition of Dewey, Veblen and that entire crowd. Including the Rockefellers? Reading hints are gratefully received. I envy you your organisation .

Nope — you have admitted you are a Nazi, which is antithetical to the principles of the Founders.

Nope? What does subject admission have to do with an inability to suggest an opinion/analysis on founding principles?

I wasn’t born a “Nazi,” I was made one.

On the founding principles:

Acts Of The First Congress of the United States, 1790

Section 1: Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, that any alien, being a free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States, for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen there of, on application…

So, what happened, Dave?

From the earliest days of the American republic, Jews were technically considered white, at least in a legal sense. Under the Naturalization Act of 1790, they were considered among the “free white persons” who could become citizens. Later laws limited the number of immigrants from certain countries, restrictions which were in part targeted at Jews. But unlike Asian and African immigrants in the late 19th century, Jews retained a claim to being “Caucasian,” meaning they could win full citizenship status based on their putative race. [ The Atlantic]

But Dr. Hasia Diner, a professor at New York University, argues that American Jews didn’t “become” white. Pointing to the Naturalization Act of 1790 and immigration records, Diner says that we are and have always been white.

She is quick to add that we also viewed ourselves as such, “Jews considered themselves a race as well they saw themselves as different and … felt that they had bonds to each other that were very different than non-Jews, who were always called ‘goyim.’”

Jews were always white,” Diner says. “There is never a time when their ability to naturalize and acquire citizenship and acquire a political voice was in jeopardy. It doesn’t mean they didn’t experience discrimination. But they were, by law, white … they could hold office and vote and sit on juries. They could feel pretty confident that the state would protect them. That was just not the case for nonwhite people.”

That’s what happened, Dave – in a nutshell.

For which Carolyn deserves not one single smidgen of credit

I didn’t say she deserves credit. I said the fruits and blessings of western technology/scientific achievement/culture is an aspect of her/our heritage/birthright, the geneses of which are inherent within us upon our inception.

There is no magic dirt, Dave. I guess one could say, WE are the magic dirt. (or clay, as it were…I don’t really know; I’m certain clay is a mistranslation…)

Most English, Germans, and Scots did nothing at all to contribute to modern science.

Oh? Then who did during the 14th century til 20th century? Or, do we start in Sumer and work our way up? God forbid…

Indeed, you don’t even deign to seriously learn about the discoveries we scientists have made or even show respect for our work.

On what information/data do you base this allegation against me?

In the meantime, let me just say, I show my appreciation to you, PhysicistDave, by volunteering as one of your TUR online lab rats…and, I’ll have you know that I adore Richard Dawkins, so there…

1. Yes, I have more years of schooling than you…2. The point is that you have done an abysmally poor job of educating yourself.

1. On what information/data do you base this conclusion?

2. I’m not sure that’s true, particularly judging from the manner in which you ping-pong in avoidance of actually answering specific questions or offering specific rebuttals to various assertions submitted in opposition to your points of view/suppositions.

Socialism does not work.

Explain Sweden, Norway, Finland….pre-Diversity, of course (Ah! There’s that pesky genetic component rearing its blonde head again!). And, Dave, I’ve been to Scandinavia and attended school with Scandinavian exchange students…so, keep that in mind when/if you post more condescending slop in an attempt to insult my intelligence….

Nope — read Clastres’ book.

Who was Pierre Clastres?

Clastres was born on 17 May 1934, in Paris, France. He studied at the Sorbonne, obtaining a licence in Literature in 1957, and a supérieures spécialisées in Philosophy…He began working in Anthropology after 1956 as a student of Claude Lévi-Strauss –

Gustave Claude Lévi-Strauss was born in 1908 to French-Jewish parents… He grew up in Paris, living on a street of the upscale 16th arrondissement…During the First World War, he lived with his maternal grandfather, who was the Rabbi of Versailles.

From 1918 to 1925 he studied at Lycée Janson de Sailly high school…In his last year (1924), he was introduced to philosophy, including the works of Marx and Kant, and began shifting to the political left…

Here’s what the Jewish Forward says about Gustave: For Lévi-Strauss, as for Boas and other Jewish anthropologists, there was another dimension to being a cultural outsider: It drew them to a sympathetic view of simpler cultures… The young intellectual who probably didn’t feel quite French — whose people were driven into hiding and murdered because of their odd and separate customs — became the fieldworker who penetrated the Amazon forest and recorded the odd customs of even more separate people, respecting and preserving them for posterity.

Clastres’s first book, Chronicle of the Guayaki Indians…, was translated into English by Paul Auster, because he was fascinated by Clastres’s prose, which seemed to combine a “poet’s temperament with a philosopher‘s depth of mind.”

Considered his major work – Society Against the State: The Leader as Servant and the Human Uses of Power Among the Indians of the Americas…(it was republished in 1989 with subtitle – Essays in Political Anthropology, as a collection of essays).

Of the 11 essays, Dave, two were titled accordingly, 1. Philosophy of the Indian Chieftainship; 2. Of Torture in Primitive Societies.

The Leader as servant? Philosophy of Chieftainship? Human uses of power? That reeks of some form of hierarchy, Dave.

Here’s a point of interest: Clastres was accused of stripping Guarani texts [clearly recorded/transcribed by outsiders, as Guarani had no written language] of specific references that did not align with Clastres’s overall theories. The allegation was made by a Paraguayan anthropologist who specialized in Guarani culture.

Here’s more crap from/on the social scientist, Clastres, who clearly meets, precisely, the very definition of the Stupid Gentiles, correctly excoriated by you, who contributed to the downfall of European society, of their own volition, of course, with NO influence, whatsoever, by the viscerally anti-western scholarship and tutelage of Jewish teachers/philosophers/cuckoos in western institutions:

Clastres, however, argued that power does not imply, either coercion or violence, and proposed a ‘Copernican revolution” in political anthropology…[Oh, sure, let’s evoke the conjectures and philosophies of one of the greatest German minds of European science/culture upon an attempt to favorably analyze the customs of a horde of frog-catching, canoe-paddling, hut-building, slave-raiding, squat savages for the purpose of evaluating their cultural/political structure and asserting, ridiculously, that’s it’s superior or even commensurate with our own]

But, then –

Clastres: On their struggle against the State, on keeping their society an egalitarian one, however, they use violent methods: torture and warfare. [A critic, Samuel] Moyn said that Clastres “reinterpret[ed] the violence in primitive society as internal and essential to its self immunization against the rise of the state”… Clastres did not think on it as cruel practice and using Soviet Union penal tattoos on Anatoly Marchenko as example, Clastres affirmed: “It is proof of their admirable depth of mind that the Savages knew all that ahead of time, and took care, at the cost of a terrible cruelty, to prevent the advent of a more terrifying cruelty.” Instead he argued torture in rites of passage had the function of prohibiting inequality:

The law they come to know in pain is the law of primitive society, which says to everyone: You are worth no more than anyone else; you are worth no less than anyone else. The law, inscribed on bodies, expresses primitive society’s refusal to run the risk of division, the risk of a power separate from society itself, a power that would escape its control. Primitive law, cruelly taught, is a prohibition of inequality that each person will remember. — Clastres, “Of Torture in Primitive Societies”

In other words, Dave, the Guarani’s were essentially Bolsheviks. Indeed. No wonder…

Why don’t you read The Rivers Ran East, Leonard Clark, copyright 1953 – “East of the Peruvian Andes, lies the vast rainforest of the Gran Pajonal, laced with white-water rivers and inhabited by savages to whom torture and death are every day matters.”

“From now on, Senor, in all these rivers, you will find headhunters – put out your fires at night; anchor in deep water when you sleep.”

“Jose bent over one of the savages [killed after attacking the peaceful expedition]… he was further recognized… as a renegade curaca, a labor chief named Saki, in the service of a powerful patrone based on the Alto Ucayali…[who] once boasted that he had captured 600 Campa women and children and sold them…”

Tell me, again, Dave, how I don’t understand stateless human societies, particularly those that were scrutinized, analyzed, and admired, generally, by the Useless/Useful Idiot, Pierre Clastres? Or, on how I am utterly incorrect in asserting that Jewish influence has negatively impacted our world views, particularly as it pertains to the actual/observable supremacy of European culture, generally?

On that note, have you ever met such a savage as those loved by Pierre? I have….Comanches are still in Texas, and they worked on the farm of my grandmother’s family. I’ve traveled in South America, as well. Let’s compare notes…

The Indians of the Americas, practically everywhere, lived in a perpetual state of savage and brutal warfare. Not all, of course – the more highly organized tribes of the coastal regions had greater peace and prosperity amongst themselves, however they were constantly subjected to the predations of the relatively unorganized, therefore more wantonly savage, tribes, who were constantly in search of greater resources/plunder, which was likely necessitated by their lack of organization regarding resource management. That said, the Aztecs and Mayas, were highly organized, yet quite savage towards the other bands in their region – lots of yanking-out of beating hearts to please the Sun – perhaps it comes down to a genetic component with regard to how a society ultimately manages itself – in any case, I think Dave Miller doth protest too much…

And for you,

who are a self-proclaimed National Socialist and an outspoken admirer of Adolf Hitler

, to accuse libertarians of “authoritarianism”… well, it shows you do retain a sense of humor… You’ve made clear which you prefer: the policy of National Socialism.

I, too, am an admirer of National Socialist Germany and Adolf Hitler. The necessity and correctness of National Socialism was a response to the dire/exponentially downward-spiraling conditions of Germany/Europe, particularly post-WW1, and generally due to the economic and cultural emancipation of Jewry throughout Europe by the mid-1800s (England had long been subjected; Russia was the primary hold-out against emancipation by the late 1800s – “*At the Congress of Berlin in 1878,* Rumania was opened to Jewry. On Russia, Jewry did not yet dare to make the same demand. This is yet to come.” [The Triumph of Judaism Over Germanism, Wilhelm Marr, 1879 (*somewhat paraphrased)] – come it did, poor Russia…The authoritarian nature of NS Germany was crucial considering the task at hand; by 1933, America and all of Europe were under significant alien influences.

I have watched/listened to the testimony of 50+ Jewish Shoah “survivors,” and the economic prosperity/wealth accumulation they ALL described after WW1 was astonishing; for some it was already generational. The methods by which European Jews were able to acquire extraordinary abundance/affluence during/post WW1, whilst Europeans, generally, were sifting and hobbling through the ruins, is outlined ( and predicted) in the manifesto of the First Anti-Jewish Congress in Dresden of 1882. Adolf Hitler was well aware of what had happened/was happening in Germany/Europe, and he openly proclaimed his intention to thwart further subjugation by alien agendas through speculative finance, usury, etc. He remained true to his mission, and the results he produced via a policy of Germans First! were problematic as examples to the rest of the western world on what was possible without subservience to the emerging global status quo.

The American tradition is for morality to be decided by free social interaction, free expression of social approval or disapproval. I stand with America.

Ha! Tell that to the brown and black Americans, who care NOT for the traditions and mores of Eurocentric! society. The Jews/Israel love Eurocentric America to the extent they profit and prosper within it; those who truly appreciate it for what it was, typically support Jewish hegemony, as do most other groups, excepting Whites. THEY are all Cuckoos in America/Europe, at least in the big picture. Considering the current demographic situation of America, the Only Solution is a form of European/White National Socialism.

That simple fact is why they, whomever they are, lie incessantly (i.e., the holocaust) over what National Socialism was and what was actually done in its name.

Worth a watch; you won’t watch, but if you do, note that the attempts to open American and European society to regular importation of The Other began well before 1945:

The Inner-Workings of World Jewry…Ep. 2

1. But in many stateless societies, if you choose to ignore the influential guy in the group…2. I am well aware that these well-known facts are not presented to you in the (government-run) American educational institutions

1. In a society (historically/typically) lacking in means to implement/enforce “common law,” if you choose to ignore the influential guy, you are forcefully cast-out or marginalized. Maybe you’re executed. Of course, another option is to leave of your own volition and live in isolation or start your own group, wherein another hierarchy is established in accordance with your Weltanschauung.

I find it interesting that there are no current “stateless” or anarchistic nations comprised of European peoples, however that’s not the case for ALL other ethnic groups. So, we must be on to something, because all other ethnic groups seem to clamor to live amongst us, as their communities are mostly shit-holes by European standards…the Founding Fathers, whom we both admire (?), found that some semblance of national/state authority was/is necessary for human civilizational progress and prosperity, which certainly includes/enables progress in fields of science and technology. Anarchy was never the ideal; small/limited government is the ideal amongst a Like People, just as the founders indicated.

2. Why do you continue to insult me by suggesting that I am poorly educated, considering that you, yourself, previously claimed that you are an autodidact? I have repeatedly said that our education system is practically useless, which I recognized whilst still immersed in it. So, neither of us relied, ultimately, on Organized Academia, to form our opinions/positions. And? Perhaps you mean to say I am too stupid to understand you?

But, yes, as I have previously asserted, there seems to be some sort of organized effort in American/European society to keep the masses ignorant and uninformed. The question is – did the objective change from simply keeping the masses mollified, and therefore more easily governed, to causing us to turn-in on ourselves and against our national identities/cultures for the purpose of rendering us helpless/unwilling to defend ourselves against the arrival of that Mocha Melting Pot? It is certainly more complex an issue than a simple juxtaposition of those two opposing agendas, but I contend that the insertion/acceptance of aliens, who often bring malevolent intent/concepts/ideals into our various institutions, and who upon ascendancy, then use our high-trust, open, fair, charitable, and individualistic customs/mores against us, has/is causing our ultimate and willful ruination.

It goes back to White Gentiles in the Progressive Era and earlier — John Dewey, to take a concrete example. It just plain was not “the Jews.”

We agree, Dewey was, generally, a disaster (I think he pilfered from Maria Montessori, btw), but I found no evidence that he held a disdain for European society, per se. And, I agree, it’s more complicated than just “the Jews.” Yet…

So, it seems that Dewey was a bit of a communist/Marxist, yes? Ah! Communism and Marxism, of which the inception and proliferation through terror/violence and/or education, was brought to the fore throughout Europa by those pesky Saxons? Please, Dave…

Here’s what I found on Dewey –

*[Dewey] Worried about working for a university dedicated to laissez-faire capitalism, Dewey found himself becoming more of a populist, more of a socialist, more sympathetic to the settlement house pioneered by Jane Addams, and more skeptical of his childhood Christianity.

*In China, he was called a “second Confucius.”  [Is that true, Dave? I wonder why the education system in China failed to succumb to the nit-wit social platitudes within his educational dogmas?]

*Arriving in Chicago during the strike, he mused, “I am something of an anarchist.”

*He socialized with radicals in Greenwich Village. [Lots of Jews were therein, and radical Jewry has a much different flavor than radical Gael-ery.]

* He favored community, equality, activity, freedom. He had no use for McGuffey Readers, designed to instill character, patriotism, and love of God. He believed in unions, strikes, government planning, and redistribution of income. [Freedom to redistribute income?]

*He supported efforts that led to the founding of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and the American Civil Liberties Union. [Surprise, surprise! Need I inform you of the disproportionate ethnic composition of the founders/officers/funders of both organizations?]

Here’s what Marcus Garvey knew about the NAACP: In 1917, early Black nationalist Marcus Garvey became famous for storming out of the NAACP’s headquarters proclaiming to be “dumbfounded” by the apparent domination of Whites. These “Whites” included Board Chairman Joel Spingarn, his brother Arthur who was pro bono counsel, Herbert Lehman of the Executive Committee, Arthur Sachs, Herbert Seligmann – director of public relations, and his secretary Martha Gruening. All Jewish. In later years, Jews had their revenge when Garvey ran into trouble with the law concerning his part-ownership of a steam line business. “I am being punished for the crime of the Jew Silverstone, an agent of the Black Star line,” he complained. “I was persecuted by Maxwell Mattuck, another Jew, and I am to be sentenced by Judge Julian Mack, the NAACP board member.”

Dave, the “Conspiracy Theory” reveals itself.

No, that technology is not a product of Carolyn’s ” ethnic and societal heritage.”

Oh, yes it is. What’s the statistic? 97% of the innovators/discoverers/achievers in the field of sciences and arts from the 14th-15th century til the 20th, and the resultant technologies/institutions that have modernized/beautified our world, had/have an ethnic origin in Europe. Germany is smack in the middle of the corresponding map of Origin, and amongst the European groups, the English, Germans, and (Scottish) Celts were/are the most prolific. So, Germanic, German, and Celt reign supreme.

It is a product of natural science, for which Carolyn has openly and unequivocally expressed deep hatred and contempt.

No, you mischaracterize again. Not to speak for her, but she seems to embrace the notion that – Man does not live by bread (and hard science/tangible assets) alone. There should be/is more to inform us, accessed from within a spiritual/unknowable, yet somehow perceivable realm, which can sustain us beyond what Science has provided.

But if you were right, there would be no hope.

No, if we remain ignorant of and oblivious to WHO/WHAT has their tentacles, both covertly and obviously (under the guise of Humanitarian BS/Never Again! BS/One World BS, Racism! BS, White Guilt! BS, etc.), embedded within our various political, cultural, and academic institutions, then there is likely no hope.

But, Dave, it ain’t over ‘til the last Saxon is gone.

Dave, it has not escaped my notice that you refuse to specifically answer/address the pointed allegations/assertions I put forth in our commentary, such as:

abolish the Fed, wipe out the Deep State, etc.

I do not disagree here. Can you admit that from inception, both institutions were/are infested with busybody-Jews to a disproportionate degree?

Or:

Yes, the evangelical Christians stupidly collude with Judea against their own nations, and I despise them for their stupid beliefs and actions, but Europe is facing precisely the same issues as we are in America, and Europe is not evangelical, so…what’s going on?
And,
So, why does a nation deliberately lower the standards of education for their populace? – why is America dumbing-down their own people/their own future leaders and innovators?…It makes no sense, unless…it’s deliberate, and it’s of malicious intent.

Anthropologists tell us that most human societies that have ever existed lacked the institution of the state

What do anthropologists tell us about the bands of humans once wandering about stateless? No chiefs? No lead huntsmen? No revered medicine men? No captives in servitude? Please, Dave – call it what you want – hierarchy, pecking order, pack leader, Mother Nature, resource acquisition/guarding, Might is Right, etc. – some sort of defined structure will always emerge, and for general survival or prosperity, a structure is needed for basic security and societal cohesion. The ability to choose a grocery store or an employer can and does exist in a duly-governed, prosperous, and well-organized society, but that’s NOT the crux of the issue – the issue is – how do People, generally, govern themselves, and how are opposing viewpoints and objectives to be handled? For European society, as we know it, there is a distinct genetic component to the workable solutions for this particular dilemma of governance, self or otherwise, which you, of course, deny.

But it is considered a bit déclassé to just come out and say they are all a bunch of crooks. But isn’t that the real truth?

It certainly seems to be true. I don’t suggest that Puritans and WASPS are wholly innocent of crookery. I submit that the scope and breadth of “White” crookery is generally less destructive, less wanton, and less visceral than that of other population groups. Has the political/cultural state in America been improved by the loosening of our political/cultural/ethnic mores in the last few decades, or has said loosening, via alien “emancipation,” caused an exponential decline?

The real truth, as I see it, is that the body of our constitutional republic has been infiltrated and turned against us. We would not be where we are if the initial constraints regarding political power and citizenship had been maintained. The problem ain’t the Irish influx, Dave.

that the US government is just a huge rip-off scheme, I still have to keep paying them money

So, how did the USA manage to hobble along for over a century without the Federal Reserve or a Federal Income Tax? I assume you are familiar with the details of the establishment of same; don’t you think there was a bit of sneak occurring on Christmas Eve Eve in 1913? Anyway, there had been previous attempts for the establishment of a central bank and wealth/income tax (Wilson-Gorman, 1894), but all were struck down, repeatedly. What changed? Perhaps the ethnic makeup of the wielders of money-power and influence, particularly of those with global connections/networks and converging interests, changed and grew in number, such that a new (underlying) sensibility and objective for our nation came into being?

There was only one alien group arriving to America in the 1800s and early 1900s with the capacity to affect such change and influence.

Why, then, was the Immigration Act of 1924 deemed necessary at that time considering that the Naturalization Act of 1790 had theretofore been sufficient? As usual of late, a Jewish person was needed to inform Anglo-Saxon/Mayflower America on what was wrong with their nation:

Emmanuel Celler, in the United States House of Representatives…from March 1923 to January 1973… chaired the House Committee on the Judiciary…and was a leading advocate for the liberalization of immigration and naturalization laws, from his early stand against the Immigration Act of 1924 to his sponsorship of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965… he ushered the major civil rights legislation including the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Voting Rights Act of 1965…

This national origin system was structured to preserve the ethnic and religious identity of the United States by reducing immigration from Eastern and Southern Europe, thereby excluding many Jews…Celler opposed…the isolationists in 1943…he called the immigration policy, “cold and cruel”…Celler was also a Zionist who supported the recognition of Israel…[Wiki]

Trust me, Dave, Celler did not have a bee in his bonnet over a dearth of Italians, Spaniards, or Greeks arriving, en masse, to America. He didn’t give a rat’s ass about the plight of Negroes in America, either, beyond their capacity to vote against White/European rule/interests.

Frankly, you are just playing into their hands

Yes, that’s what we are told – opposition is exactly what They want! Why? Because antisemitism is good for the Jews! Why? Because it strengthens their claims of perpetual oppression and guiltless victimhood. How so? Because the history of Jewish perfidy and disproportionate involvement in sinful actions attributed solely to Europeans is relatively unknown. Why? Largely because they have captured news, media, and publishing industries due to a vast accumulation of global wealth….on and on it goes. So, leave them be! Don’t look for “stereotypical” patterns, you bigots! Sure…

Do you know what else is good for the Jews? Here’s what:

Jewish World
“Islamization of Europe a good thing”
Rabbi Baruch Efrati believes Jews should, “rejoice at the fact that Europe is paying for what it did to us for hundreds of years by losing its identity.” He praises Islam for promoting modesty, respect for God.
[Kobi Nahshoni, Published: 11.11.12/Israel Jewish Scene]

Berliner Seitung
, January 16, 2023 [in excerpt]
[Headline]: Behzad K. Khani on New Year’s Eve: Integrate your damn selves!
By Behzad Karim Khani

And frankly: who can blame them [immigrants] for not being eager to fully identify with your [German/European] society?
You may have guessed it: this is about New Year’s Eve [a mass sexual assault event]…The street that we in Kreuzberg and Neukölln lovingly call the Gaza Strip. The street that once inspired one of my Israeli friends to remark, jokingly and not entirely without glee: “The Arabs are the Jews’ revenge against the Germans.”
I think we have reached a point now where we can acknowledge certain obvious realities… Let’s start with the simple observation that we – migrants, foreigners, people of color… call us what you want – will not be going away anytime soon. And neither will you, dear bio-Deutsche. Well, demographically speaking, you are definitely going away…We migrants will probably inherit this country…

Do you really believe that America is not in the same boat as Europe? I wonder what Alejandro Mayorkas, former Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society and US Border Security guru says about what the Bio-Deutsch did to his People?

Why do you personally hate the Jews so much? There must be some reason — some Jewish guy assaulted you or something?

No, I was never assaulted by a Jewish person. I wouldn’t categorize my feelings/opinions as personal hatred. I am hardly the only person to conclude that Jews, generally, are havoc-bringers, extraordinaire, to European society, and they operate on opposing sides of the havoc wielding:

At home it became more and more clear that we harboured men who ate the bread of our soil under the protection of Hungarian soldiers, who drank the water of our wells and slept peacefully, whilst putting forth every possible effort to make us lose the war.

The overthrow of authority and of traditions are the necessary preliminaries to the destruction of a nation.

The crowd approved and failed to notice that the Semitic race was only to be found at the two ends of the queue, and that not a single representative of it could be seen as a buyer among the crowding, the poor, and the starving…. This was symbolical, a condensed picture of Budapest. The sellers, the agitators, were Jews. The buyers and the misguided were the people of the capital.

[…] the newspapers wrote long articles about the Spanish “flu.” The epidemic was serious, people met their friends at funerals, but the newspapers exaggerated intentionally; they published alarming statistics and reported that the undertakers could not cope with the situation…The panic-stricken crowd could scarcely think of anything else. The terror of the epidemic was everywhere, and the greater terror which threatened, the brewing revolution, was hidden by it. The press, as if working to order, hypnotised the public with the ghost of the epidemic while it belittled the misfortunes of the unfortunate nation and rocked its anxiety to sleep by raising foolish, false hopes of a good peace…

Then something suddenly dawned on me: in this paper a victorious race was exulting over the fall of a defeated nation! And the defeated, the insulted nation was my own!… So they hated us as much as all that, they, who lived among us as if they were part of us. Why? What have we done to them? They were free, they were powerful, they fared better with us than in any other country. And yet they rejoiced that we should disappear in dishonour, in shame, in defeat.

I threw the newspaper away—It was an enemy. [An Outlaw’s Diary, Cécile Tormay, October 9, 2022]

Patterns, Dave, patterns….Germany held its first international conference in opposition to organized Jewry in Dresden on September 11, 1882 – I’m sure there’s no interesting or curiously recognizable pattern there…

Tormay was an eyewitness to the incursions of the Bolsheviks/Reds who entered into Hungary both during and in the aftermath of WW1 with the support/assistance of “assimilated” Hungarian Jewry. Perhaps you could give her published diary a read?

So why do you hate the Jews, rather than hating the overwhelmingly White Gentile ruling elite who have in fact wrecked our country?

I have explained already.

Why do you conflate White Nationalism with gratuitous hatred and bigotry?

In any event, White Gentiles are my People, and that’s where my loyalty lies.

You Jew-haters list some powerful and influential Jews and then conclude that Jews run the country and the world. But you could equally list some powerful Americans of Irish descent, of Italian descent, or whatever.

Of course, Anglo-Saxons and the Irish ruled America, entirely, at one time. The same can be said for every European nation, generally, at one time. Regarding world rule, a world diaspora is needed, yes? Only Whites and Jews, in recent history, have accomplished the feat of global rule/influence, yes? Which group has managed to retain their rule/influence?

So, give me the name of one American of Irish or Italian descent, who operated in America prior to, say, 1900, whose political or cultural machinations had a permanently deleterious effect on America. Give me the name of one American of Irish or Italian descent who did the same after 1900, and let’s see if we can discern any mitigating factors in their nation-wrecking conduct.

Do you really believe it is “for the greater good” rather than for the good of those who get to receive the loot?

No, not necessarily, and I didn’t say that it was always honest or well-meaning. I said that particular types, such as Bolsheviks/Vulture Capitalists (aka disproportionately Jewish) and the WhiteLady-Lesbian Addams, meddle, compulsively, in society, insisting we toe their line via claims that their meddling is for the greater good, i.e., Fink (J)/Blackrock says – I (we) can demand greater social change for even more diversity and inclusion in American culture/politics, which I (we) am/are able to enforce because of the loosening of societal/governmental/venture and speculative capital constraints, which we non-Gentiles hysterically demanded, and now that we have ascended, I (we) will close the avenues for opposing the new constraints we are establishing/have established that prevents the specific pale Gentile group who suddenly deigns to defy/protest against our version of the Greater Good, which is anything that’s Bad For Whites, Primarily (or Amalek/Edom, ultimately), like AIPAC or American/Israeli dual citizenship, open borders, etc. – I’m paraphrasing, of course.

I think the differences, practically and ideologically, between what LesbianLadies and FinkPeople can accomplish/have accomplished, to our detriment, defies belief. You are a perfect example of that conundrum…

Mty main argument with Carolyn was pointing out that…people like Carolyn who argue that the net value of technology is negative but who then continue to use everything from computers and the Internet…are simply hypocrites. If she really believed that, she could and would go “off-grid,” disappear into the wilderness, and avoid technology altogether. But of course she won’t.

Well, why would/should she? The current technological advances/utilities/devices are a product of her/our ethnic and societal heritage, and furthermore, you are mischaracterizing what she asserted.

Happy New Year to you, Dave.

you side stepped my comment about the communist countries that fought in ww2 being the countries that aren’t run by zionist jewish supremacists, by how saying about poland and hungary? when i educated you, you feebly replied, well they were communist after that.

Rest assured, I knew the political status of Poland and Hungary prior to WW2.

You said – “you can thank your glorious fuhrer for the fact you have the jewish supremacist whip hand over you right now, while the communist countries of ww2, are now free of your masters control.”

I interpreted that to include Poland and Hungary, wherein communists regimes were, in fact, installed after/by Soviet invasions that occurred after/during WW2 and in accordance with Potsdam/Yalta; I responded accordingly, and included reference to Rumania and Ukraine, indicating WHY I doubt those countries are as free from subservience/control/influence of our current Masters as you suggest.

Did you mean to say that Hitler was the master controlling the communist countries of WW2? That makes no sense….so, again, where was my sidestep?

when i said the soviets were the only country trading with them during ww2 (outside of the axis),

You did not specify outside of the axis – You wrote – “your excusing the german sneak attack on a country with whom they had signed a non aggression pact, who was the only country still selling them oil and trading with them in defiance of the jewish supremacist bds, (they had declared on germany when hitler became chancellor)…”

Where was your specification or inference to countries outside the axis?

1. yes, germans were programmed, thanks to adolf’s suicidal attempt to sneak attack the soviet union, open a second front on his eastern flank, 2. with a country that had been helping them, 3. that most likely would have been bombed by the allies,

1. Programmed by whom? By Hitler? You asked about Germans of today.

2. Russia was helping Germany? For what purpose? Who was helping Bolshevik/Soviet Russia?

3. I am familiar with the notion that England was considering military action against the Soviet Union; it’s well known that PigChurchill was cognizant of the destructive, malevolent, and proliferate nature of Bolshevism/Communism; he was aware of the underlying Jewish elements of same, yet PigChurchill colluded with western Jewry and refused to cooperate with Germany in efforts to thwart Stalin’s “world” agenda, only to circle back, too late, with Operation Unthinkable in cooperation with what was left of the German military. Then The Pig starts squealing at the world over an Iron Curtain that he damn-well assisted in unfurling over much of Europe…

In any case, western/American Jewry would have never permitted western powers to curtail the ongoing “Russian” revolution that ended the Tsars and emancipated Jews in Russia. Just aks Herr Jacob Schiff…

In The Gathering Storm, Pig wrote the following:

There never was a war more easy to stop than that which has just wrecked what was left of the world from the previous struggle. The human tragedy reaches its climax in the fact that after all the exertions and sacrifices of hundreds of millions of people and of the victories of the Righteous Cause, we have still not found Peace or Security, and that we lie in the grip of even worse perils than those we have surmounted…

He then goes on to refer to the awful unfolding scene of the future.

What? Hitler’s long gone. Germany’s down and out. England “won.” To whom/what was he referring as even worse perils? Worse than “Nazis?”

[…] I feel compelled standing before my conscience to direct yet another appeal to reason in England… I am speaking in the name of reason. I see no compelling reason which could force the continuation of this war. I regret the sacrifices it will demand, I would like to spare my nation….[Adolf Hitler, July 1940]

On WHO was helping Bolshevik/Soviet Russia; the ally of England/the enemy of Germany, yes?

THE RUSSIAN WAR HAS WEAKENED EVERY ARGUMENT FOR INTERVENTION
, ROBERT A. TAFT, U. S. Senator from Ohio
 Over the Columbia Broadcasting System, June 25, 1941

The European War Is Not a War of Democracy Against Tyrannies


“The complete absurdity of going to war even to spread our highest ideals is certainly revealed by the present situation in Europe. In the alleged battle between the totalitarian states and the democracies, we now find Communist Russia transformed into a democracy… But how can anyone swallow the idea that Russia is battling for democratic principles? Yet the President on Monday announced that the United States would give all possible aid to Russia the character and quantity of the aid to await only a disclosure of Russian needs. Because overnight Russia is transformed from an aggressor into a democracy, the Treasury has released $40,000,000 in Russian assets, although the assets of France are frozen tighter than a drum.
 To spread the four freedoms throughout the world we will ship airplanes and tanks and guns to Communist Russia…Russia proved to be as much of an aggressor as Germany. If through our aid Stalin is continued in power, do you suppose that he will spread the four freedoms through Finland and Estonia and Latvia and Lithuania?”

so you’re a german fairy princess, born and raised in texas

Exactly. And, you’re a Slav who reveres Bolsheviki Russia/Stalin, who by your view, justifiably and properly Holodomored millions of Slavic wreckers, then went on to rape and pillage half of Europe, which you apparently deem as acceptable behavior simply because they opposed Niemcy?

Well, Niemcy opposed Globally Organized Jewry/Israel; Soviet Russia colluded with Globally Organized Jewry/Israel, as did the rogue governments of America/England, and look where we are today. It’s time to pick a side and Tell The Truth & Shame The Devil, which you should read, btw…(author is Gerard Menuhin).

WHAT issue did I sidestep?

Have you answered a single question that I’ve posed to you? Nope.

According to you, more rambling = offering substantiated data, facts, and source material in support of an assertion/opinion/alternative narrative.

why don’t you ask the average german of today

I am a German of today. Perhaps not average, because I haven’t been throttled and browbeaten, relentlessly, by a re-education program imposed by the Victors = Judaized Liars & Traitors & Hypocrites & (deliberately made) Ignoramuses.

what they think of adolf, what kind of answer do you think you’ll get? you’ll get the answer they were programmed to give

So, do you hereby acknowledge that Germans, in Germany, were programmed to believe and spout a false narrative on Hitler/WW2? Or, are you saying Hitler was right about Jews/Judea/Israel?

Sure, very many will answer, falsely, that Hitler drew a Secret Map of World Conquest, which SLBFDR, fortunately for the World, acquired in the nick of time; said conquest was to particularly pummel and annihilate all back-ass-wards Slavs, especially the Mongolian type, as they lived and breathed in the entirety of Poland and Russia whilst simultaneously shoving every living Jew in gas chambers to suffocate with bug spray, then zap to ash in minutes with some sort of laser technology unknown to this very day….of course, he only got around to zapping exactly 6 Million! because 6 Million is some sort of Magic Number according to the Talmud or some other ancient Babylonian scroll. Hitler was nothing if not precise.

to side step the fact the russians were still selling them oil and buying their products

Did I deny that Russia and Germany were trading? I did not. YOU said – (Russia) who was the only country still selling them oil and trading with them in defiance of the jewish supremacist bds.

I countered your erroneous assertion. Did the same for the little joiner, HystericalAvery…do you deny the errors?

where do you and your child soldier big brothers live, in a fairy tale castle outside of langley?

They are all younger; they/we were all competitive athletes, hunters, and anglers; the Knoxville Erectus Gang would have NEVER bested any one of them, whilst in a moving vehicle, no less; they are all engineers; we were born and raised in Texas.

where do you think hitler got the money to build the german army?

Why don’t you tell me? Partly by the implementation of a national credit program?

do you think he pulled it out of his ass?

No, but I’m fairly certain Germany, not being a nation of inherently parasitical deceivers and swindlers, had NOT this sort of financial underpinnings for the establishment of Eretz Germania:

Israel gets most of its aid money at the start of each year, rather than in quarterly installments like other countries.

This means that Israel starts earning interest on the money right away – interest paid by the US since Israel deposits these funds into an interest-bearing account at the New York Federal Reserve Bank.

By all accounts the United States has given more money to Israel than to any other country. According to the Congressional Research Service, as of January 2023, in constant 2021 U.S. dollars (inflation-adjusted), total U.S. aid to Israel obligated from 1946-2023 is an estimated $260 billion.

The United States has granted more total aid to Israel since World War II than to any other country.

*SINCE 1992, the U.S. has offered Israel an additional $2 billion annually in loan guarantees. Congressional researchers have disclosed that between 1974 and 1989, $16.4 billion in U.S. military loans were converted to grants…Indeed, all past U.S. loans to Israel have eventually been forgiven by Congress…U.S. policy since 1984 has been that economic assistance to Israel must equal or exceed Israel’s annual debt repayment to the United States. Unlike other countries, which receive aid in quarterly installments, aid to Israel since 1982 has been given in a lump sum at the beginning of the fiscal year, leaving the U.S. government to borrow from future revenues. Israel even lends some of this money back through U.S. treasury bills and collects the additional interest.

*In addition, there is the more than $1.5 billion in private U.S. funds that go to Israel annually in the form of $1 billion in private tax-deductible donations and $500 million in Israeli bonds. The ability of Americans to make what amounts to tax-deductible contributions to a foreign government, made possible through a number of Jewish charities, does not exist with any other country. Nor do these figures include short and long-term commercial loans from U.S. banks, which have been as high as $1 billion annually in recent years. [*Washington Report on Middle East Affairs]

Go ahead and explain how Germany/Hitler was/is responsible for the above described abomination of American fiscal/foreign policy?

Didn’t mass Jewish immigration from Eastern Europe to America commence decades before Hitler’s election? Wasn’t the Federal Reserve established before WW1/WW2/NS Germany? The Whip Hand was set loose long before the arrival of Adolf Hitler.

ultimately adolf hitler acted in the interests of jewish supremacy whether he knew it or not.

Oh, yes, again, the tired invocation of Hitler’s ultimate guilt/culpability for our impending downfall, which is essentially the equivalent of – Jews! Can’t live with em’, can’t live without em’!

Antisemitism is good for the Jews; emancipation/acceptance is good for the Jews; “Muslim” murderous mayhem, like 911, is so very unfortunate, but good for the Jews (BiBi said so); the importation of yet more pesky Muslims into “Judeo-Christian” nations leads to societal destabilization, but it’s good for the Jews (Mayorkas/HIAS/Spectre said so); Germany’s persecution of the Jews was good, overall, for The Jews (Chaim Weizmann said so); Germany’s loss of WW2 was good for the Jews (The HolocaustPeople, like Emmanuel Celler, say/said so).

Every above contradiction is paradoxically true, and the still the impetus for the retributive and deliberately instigated quashing of the Western World/Amalek/Edom is on Adolf Hitler? Sure…

Jewish World, Kobi Nahshoni, Published: 11.11.12 – “Islamization of Europe a good thing”

Rabbi Baruch Efrati believes Jews should, “rejoice at the fact that Europe is paying for what it did to us for hundreds of years by losing its identity.” He praises Islam for promoting modesty, respect for God.

why don’t you go to germany and start asking germans what they think of their egomanical ubermensch, then you’ll find out his real legacy.

It has been/is illegal to speak positively, aka truthfully, about Adolf Hitler/NS in Germany since 1945. Most people, there and here, are completely unaware of the Allied campaign to obscure/eliminate access to the true facts of NS Germany/WW2 and the crimes and misdeeds of the Allies:

*In March, 1945, GI’s in Germany were actually placed under official orders not to make unflattering remarks about the Reds. Typical of our un-American efforts to throttle critics was AMG censorship in April, 1946, of a letter by a Catholic Bishop calling attention to Russian abuses of Germans through forced labor and expulsions. We prohibited the reading of the letter in churches, because it might offend Russia. Social Democrats and other German political parties have not been allowed to criticize the Communist party, lest Russia take offense.
[Associated Press, Wuerzburg, Germany, March 2, 1946; Associated Press, Wiesbaden, Germany, April 26, 1946.]

“70 years ago today, with Germany’s attack on Poland, began the most tragic chapter in the history of Europe. This war, instigated by Germany, brought immeasurable suffering on many peoples; years of disenfranchisement, humiliation, and destruction. I commemorate the many millions of people who lost their lives in battle and in resistance to Germany. I commemorate those 60 million who died in this war instigated by Germany…” [Angela “full of Horseshit” Merkel, Abomination of Germanic Chancellorship]

*Oliver Lyttleton, British Minister of Production, told the Chamber of Commerce of America in London, June 20, 1944, as reported by the United Press:
“Japan was provoked into attacking the United States at Pearl Harbor. It is a travesty on history ever to say that America was forced into the war.”

*It is now established that to avoid war with the United States, Germany ordered its submarines not to retaliate in any way when attacked by U.S. forces under orders from Washington. In clear violation of international law our vessels in the Atlantic were ordered two months before Pearl Harbor to shell all Axis craft encountered. At the time, Admiral Stark had sent a message to Admiral Kimmel that “we are at war” in the Atlantic.
[*Gruesome Harvest: The Costly Attempt to Exterminate the People of Germany, Ralph Franklin Keeling]

ubermensch

Just how much of Slavic Russia’s ascendancy into “modern European/Germanic living standards/culture” was a direct result of the efforts and superior intelligence of Anglo-Saxons/Western Europeans?

[German] Prisoners of war rebuilt factories, constructed dams, railways, ports and so on. They also built and restored houses, including apartment houses for workers of the Interior Ministry. For instance, German prisoners built the ‘Dinamo’ stadium in Moscow. They also worked in a glass mill in Lytkarino, a Moscow suburb. An archive building in Krasnogorsk, Moscow Region, was constructed following the project by Paul Spiegel, a German architect.

Qualified specialists like Spiegel were selected by the Soviets to perform complicated tasks. Historian Stefan Karner writes that by 1946, over 1,600 high-profile specialists were assigned to different Soviet industries: “Five hundred and seventy engineers, 260 civil engineers and architects, about 220 electrical engineers, over 110 doctors of physical and mathematical sciences and technical sciences.”
[Russia Beyond]

You’re welcome.

I do not defend blindly.

In what manner do you defend the Bolsheviks/Soviets?

Audie Murphy was a child soldier! At the ripe-0ld age of 17, which is not 16, so it’s not really the same?

Aren’t we all the whores of World Wide Jewry at this point? At least the NS Germans put-up a fight, whereas Churchill/FDR just bent right on over, taking their countrymen down with them, lying and manipulating all the way….Donald Trump receives a golden pager replica and over he goes; Charlie Kirk prefers not to bend, yet over he goes, one way or another, then his bedazzled wife struts around in leather pants, shabbat-shaloming in our faces. They, whomever they are, do whatever they want and NO ONE stops them.

At the very least, Stalin, once weary of Jewish=Bolsheviki subterfuge and shenanigans, whacked a pile of them, eventually. I’ll give him that…

The correct expression is – Don’t piss on my leg and tell me it’s raining.

I am female, and I would never have sex with a child. (17 yo Henry Cavill? Maybe…) This stupid sex question of yours is irrelevant and nonsensical. Era and culture, and sometimes necessity, have significant bearing on “best practices” with regard to the appropriate age for children to participate in adult endeavors; 12 yo girls were once considered appropriately aged for marriage, and still are in some places; young boys were trained/initiated as warriors in preparation for manhood in a difficult and often violent world. If a war happened to arrive, they were utilized, often willingly.

You are hysterically indicting the “Nazis” for universal practices, right or wrong/currently acceptable or not, and ignoring, as usual, Soviet (and worldwide) participation in same. You cited a specific case of German forced child combat, inaccurately, and you clearly know NOTHING about the subject matter for which you are attempting to rake the Germans over the coals. You’re very silly, Avery.

These children defended Stalingrad, flew warplanes, were some of the best snipers in the Red Army, with a few even receiving the title of Hero of the Soviet Union, the highest military decoration in the country.

…the fight against the Nazis involved almost everyone: men, women, elderly people and even children. …Tens of thousands of minors joined the resistance movement and the regular army…

In October 1941, sixteen-year-old Vasily Kurka joined the Red Army units retreating from Mariupol and asked to be enlisted in the 395th Infantry Division. Given his young age, Vasily was not sent to the frontline, but was kept in the rear services. Having learnt that soldiers were being recruited for sniper training, he convinced his commanding officers to give him a chance…Before he was killed in January 1945 fighting for Poland, Vasily had shot 179 enemy soldiers and officers, making it one of the best sniper records in the Red Army.

Not all the children who ended up on the frontline were orphans or runaways. Sometimes their parents, when going to the front, took them with them. Thus, in April 1943, fourteen-year-old Arkady Kamanin joined the 5th Assault Aviation Corps commanded by his father. After serving for several months as a flight mechanic and a navigator/observer, he performed his first flight as the pilot of a U-2 aircraft…

If the Red Army had thousands of minors serving in it, the resistance movement had tens of thousands. For youngsters, it was much easier to join the partisans than a military unit, which had to comply with certain regulations and whose commanders could face unpleasant consequences if it became known that they had teenagers on the frontline. [Russia Beyond]

Do not go gentle into that good night…

Sadly, this mantra must be taught to and learned by young boys/men, especially if they will be/are fighting for the survival of their nation. Or, for themselves – restorative justice and diversity brings local violence, or haven’t you noticed? Christopher Newsom of Knoxville, Tennessee, God rest his soul, would have been better served if he had been reared in accordance with NS youth policies/programs.

All of my siblings are male, and I’m telling you, by the age of 14, they would have made formidable soldiers, if necessary, and not a single one would have preferred to cry – I’m just a boy! – whilst under threat. I don’t understand you people, Avery; you are absolutely clueless on how your learned guilt/ignorance, uninformed reality/history, and rootless hysteria is undermining European civilization.

you need a quick lesson in history, poland and hungary weren’t communist during ww2

OK, technically not communist until after the war, but they were both former communist nations, yes?

The Polish People’s Republic was a unitary communist state established in the country after the Red Army’s takeover of Polish territory from German occupation in World War II. Communist control was strengthened through electoral fraud in the 1946 Polish people’s referendum and the 1947 Polish parliamentary election.

The Hungarian People’s Republic… It was a professed communist state, governed first by the Hungarian Working People’s Party and after the Hungarian Revolution of 1956, the Hungarian Socialist Workers’ Party. Both governments were closely tied to the Soviet Union as part of the Eastern Bloc.
The state considered itself the heir to the Hungarian Soviet Republic, which was formed in 1919 as one of the first communist states created after the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (Russian SFSR). It was designated a “people’s democratic republic” by the Soviet Union in the 1940s.

with poland seizing parts of the soviet ukrainian oblast this is why the soviets did the same to poland, when the third reich grabbed the rest.

That was not why – the Soviets pilfered and grabbed border territory pre-war, then as much territory, post-war, as permitted by Yalta/Potsdam, all in accordance with their stated objectives of a World Revolution.

your excusing the german sneak attack on a country with whom they had signed a non aggression pact, who was the only country still selling them oil and trading with them in defiance of the jewish supremacist bds

I’m excusing nothing; the Soviet Union was a menace to Europe, and every European nation had justifiable cause to take them out. A conflict between Germany and Soviet/Bolshevik Russia was inevitable. Both parties agreed to cool their jets in order to focus on other matters – Germany had to deal with England/France; Russia needed time to rebuild and retrain its post-purge military before engaging in a confrontation with a formidable/capable opponent.

Russia was the only country selling oil to Germany? Russia was the only nation trading with Germany? What about the oil fields of Rumania? The Soviets invaded Bessarabia in June, 1940 – what were the implications of this action with regard to Rumanian oil?

Let’s see –

By 1937, the Third Reich was providing a bigger market for British goods than which existed between any two continents on earth. At the end of the 1930s, with Hitler set to initiate another European war, Britain’s principal trading partner was Nazi Germany. [Preparata, Conjuring Hitler, p. 224]

Well, who knew? Not you….

Mannerheim Recording:
Hitler: I then had a discussion ..with Molotov.
 And it was quite clear .. that Molotov would go on with the decision to begin a war and when possible I would prevent him, and make him free of his war…

Because the demands that man placed were quite evidently meant for ultimately dominating Europe!

…And I always had one fear: that Russia would suddenly overtake Romania in the late autumn, and gain the possession of the oil wells.
 And we were not fully prepared in late autumn of 1940. If Russia had occupied the Romanian oil wells, then Germany would have lost the war.

look to hitler’s attitude to slavs as untermensch and his plans to expand his country through his lebensraum, after eliminating the slavs whose land he coveted,…that sure sounds like the ashcan nazis seizing palestine by force and attempting to displace the palestinians, whose links to the land extended back further than the illegitimate religious claims of zionist war criminals.

1. Germany had legitimate claims to significant territory to the east. There were millions of Germans in central and Eastern(ish) Europe. An “expansion” to the east was essentially a reclamation of territory and assets illegally taken from the German Reich by an illegal treaty after WW1. All of the reclamation was done outright, diplomatically, and peacefully until Poland.

2. Germany made a non-aggression pact with Poland which remained in effect until the death of Pilsudski. Poland chose not to renew the treaty. The city of Danzig was comprised of mostly Germans; Hitler tried for years to come to a reasonable agreement with Poles over Danzig and the corridor. Escalating hostilities and violence against the German minority in Poland led to an invasion, which was announced beforehand, and which occurred after Poland mobilized. Poland was then offered peace a few weeks after losing a war they themselves had demanded.

3. Germany did not sneak, manipulate, lie, blackmail, profiteer, bribe, collude, hide behind a greater power to cajole its way into a territory it was unable to acquire, unassisted, for itself. Germany did not betray and assassinate allies. Germany relied upon no other nation to subsidize its existence. Hitler openly proclaimed his true intentions to overturn the mandates of Versailles from the beginning. Hitler did not seek to remove or displace entire nations of Slavs or any other European group from Europe.

4. Considering the mayhem, misery, and death wrought upon the peoples of Russia, Europe, and Germany by the Soviets/Bolsheviks, Hitler was correct in attempting to ausrotten the lot from all of Europe. To the extent territory within Russia/Ukraine was liberated, Germany would have been right to occupy portions of it – there were Germans therein already; same goes for occupying Poland. It’s absolutely ridiculous to assert that Germany wanted to acquire Russia in entirety; that’s an impossibility, even for Germans.

5. Adolf Hitler/Germany stood in opposition to Jewish supremacism, which you seem to think was absent from within the Bolshevik/Communist/Soviet movement. Adolf Hitler/Germany acted in the best interest of Europa. Whether you like it or not, maintaining a Germanic/Nordic/Celtic/Western genetic component in European nations was/is essential to avoid what the MolochPeople have in store for us.

Why was a quest for Lebensraum appropriate for the Soviet Union?

There are no similarities between the objectives and actions of NS Germany and Organized Jewry/Israel.

They drafted — drafted –10s of 1,000s of German boys, some as young as 12, and threw them at the Red Army steamroller

I don’t believe this BS you spout; Hitler Youth were indeed involved in ancillary support during the war, but I seriously doubt they were sent, by compulsion, to active combat as an official policy.

How about a little due diligence, Avery? –

Willi Hübner was compelled to tell his story for the cameras: “When the Russians were closing in on Lauban, I reported for voluntary duty as a messenger to the combat commander.

The Draft! The Military Draft of very young men, very often boys! A practice unknown and theretofore unused for war before the arrival of Germany’s Evil “Nazis!” Certainly, the Soviet Union never did such a thing; nor did the United States of America…or England….

Child Soldiers! Avery, clutch your pearls over this universal aspect of Warfare:

*Audie Murphy, the most highly decorated soldier in the history of the US Army, enlisted for combat at the age of 17.

*Leaders of the Zionist Youth Movement…returned to Warsaw… More than 100,000 young Jews participated in resistance youth movements, despite the Germans outlawing such activity.

These leaders led a ghetto resistance…Youth of the Zionist resistance were part of the Armee Juive (Jewish Army) in France, created in 1942, an armed Jewish resistance in Western Europe. They took part in the 1944 uprisings against the Germans in Paris.

Many members of the youth movement, Hashomer Hatzair, fought in the Warsaw Ghetto uprising of 1943. Unlike many other instances of the use of child soldiers, participation of children in this armed resistance is usually regarded positively.

*Sons Of The Regiment Soviet Red Army, World War II:

It was something of a long-standing tradition in the Soviet Red Army to “adopt” orphans into military service, and there have been some estimates indicating that the Soviets allowed 25,000 soldiers aged 6–16 to fight on the front lines of World War II. The duties of the “Sons of the Regiment” were not limited by the soldiers’ age, and there were many instances in which a child soldier would be seen carrying a submachine gun into battle. If they were not fighting in battle, they were used in any way possible to aid the unit to which they belonged, as some took on radio duties while others served as medics or nurses.

A crime against their own people.

An allegation rarely made, yet much deserved (unlike that against Hitler), against America (SLBFDR), England (PigChurchill), or Russia (“All Soviet POWs are traitors!” Stalin).

You don’t know what you’re whinging on about, Avery. You need to get a clue, too –

And Mr. Churchill should make an exception and place trust in me when as a profit, I now proclaim: a great world empire will be destroyed. A world empire, which I never had the ambition to destroy or as much as harm. Alas, I am fully aware that the continuation of this war will end only in the complete shattering of one of the two warring parties.

In this hour, I feel compelled standing before my conscience to direct yet another appeal to reason in England… I am speaking in the name of reason. I see no compelling reason which could force the continuation of this war. I regret the sacrifices it will demand, I would like to spare my nation….
[Adolf Hitler]

[…] All of us know how terrible war is. Not one of us is worth more than the men and women who lived in the past…I considered that I owed it to our German people, and the countless men and women in the opposite camps, who as individuals were innocent of blame, to make yet another appeal to common sense, and the conscious of their statesmen. On October 6, 1939, I therefore, once more publicly stated that Germany has neither demanded, nor intended to demand anything, neither from Britain, nor from France… They declared the peace could not come about until the German Reich was destroyed and its [people left destitute]. I did not want this, immediately after the first confrontation, I extended my hand again. I myself was a soldier, and I know what it costs to gain victory. How much blood, misery, despair, deprivation, and sacrifice it takes.
[Adolf Hitler]

while the communist countries of ww2, are now free of your masters control

Are they? So, Poland and Hungary will save Europe? I hope you’re right.

What about formerly communist Ukraine? Free from the machinations of the Masters of the Universe, is it? And, formerly communist Romania? Free to elect whom they choose? Well, if Tik Tok is a vehicle for informing the truth/reality-starved masses on alternatives to the political/cultural BS constantly shoved down the throats of same, well the Masters of the Universe will just buy Tik Tok. Truth Problem solved.

Speaking of Truth Problems, Holocaust denial is ILLEGAL in Poland, Hungary, and Romania, btw. Formerly communist Poland could permit the excavation of Treblinka, btw, and thereby answer a very important question regarding the veracity of Jewish claims against Poles, who apparently stood by in viciously antisemitic complacency whilst the Greatest Crime Against Humanity was occurring under their pug-noses. Poland gets in serious trouble whenever they assert that Polish people also suffered during WW2 – I guess Poles don’t qualify for humanity status.

So, I’m not sure how “free” our future liberators in Eastern Europe are to wholly free themselves or anyone else from the impending arrival of a New (One) World Order wherein the Fair World will be dissolved into the World’s Mocha Melting Pot.

complete horseshit

In what way was NS Germany exactly the same as the Israelis have been in Palestine?

If Adolf Hitler was the lightning-rod for the arrival of the Whip Hand over the Western world, how do we explain the whipping of nations who opposed Hitler, which certainly includes America? Furthermore, what did Ireland/Sweden/Canada ever do to provoke the ire of the Rootless Cosmopolitans who organize and advocate for borderless nations everywhere in the White world? It’s not Hitler, but the Lies they tell about Hitler/NS Germany that is their cudgel against us – all of us.

Once upon a time, long before Adolf Hitler “ruined it for the rest of us,” there was a wee convention held in Dresden, Germany on September 11-12, 1882, wherein a group of Germans were just making-shit-up about potentially deleterious European affairs:

[…] Sticking together as closely as it does, the international Jewish pack has an internationally directed executive organ in the form of the Alliance Israelite Universelle, which was founded in Paris in 1860 and operates branches across the entire planet. Supposedly a mere charitable association, it has now assumed the character of a political association that virtually maintains diplomatic contacts with individual national governments…
[…]
Theses:
In order to break this influence and to eliminate the evils and danger inevitably resulting from it, [we deem] the following measures absolutely imperative:

1. The immigration of the Jews, particularly from the east, has to be prevented.

2. The predominant, largely capitalist and laissez-faire economics legislation has to be reformed. It excessively favors usury and the speculation taking place above all in the form of the share trading, banking, and stock markets over honest and upright forms of work…

3. As long as the Jews persist in their isolation and form a nation within the nation, as it were, they ought to be regarded merely as foreigners who are accorded the right to hospitality. Consequently, their civil rights should be restricted in such a way that they can neither participate in legislation nor attain any authoritative offices, namely the office of judge.

[…]

Tell me again how Adolf Hitler set the Whip Hand in motion.

Turns out, “WW2” began long before 1939.

I had started to write almost exactly what you have written, but again you beat me to it!

But, you didn’t, PooBear.

So, get crackin’. I can hardly wait…

Today, the West blames everything on Russia

Really? I don’t know anyone who actually thinks Russia is a current threat to America. Fox News (all mainstream News) is a threat to America. Non-European immigration is a threat to America. AIPAC is a threat to America. Regarding Russia, maybe we are suspicious? Maybe we should be…

So, Soviet Russia did infiltrate the American government during the FDR administration, yes? Soviet Russia was responsible for the proliferation of Bolshevism/Communism in Europe, yes? Soviet Russia was responsible for the Holodmor, yes? Soviet Russia was culpable for the mass destruction of Orthodox Christian Churches in Eastern Europe, yes? Soviet Russia invaded and raided up and down Eastern Europe, yes? Soviet Russia sent operatives into Cuba, South America, and Mexico, yes? Soviet Russia actually claimed they were intent on a World Revolution, yes?

If Germany/Germans today must bear a cross for the “crimes” and (fake) death camps of WW2/National Socialism, why does Russia/Russians get a free pass for committing actual crimes/atrocities/starvations and operating Gulags in the Soviet Union? Why does the excessive media exposure and assignment of collective guilt fall in one direction – smack on Germany and even towards America, but completely OFF Russia? Why doesn’t Russia open the Soviet archives and expose the crimes of Soviet Russia? Because the Bolsheviks are still in power in Russia?

Russia is the bulwark to ZIDSO’s Final Push to dominate the World

How so?

Slavic Russia is guided by and practices pure pragmatism; State-private ownership, State subsidies-enterprenourship, all exist and work interrelatedly and seamlessly.

Like National Socialism?

Slavs to this cohort are **cough cough** the Palestinians to us Germans

We never said any such thing.

the irony of projecting on The Other that you lack yourself.

Get over yourself, meine Kröte. The Other is more often than not a fly in the ointment…

And from the shelter of my mind
Through the window of my eyes
I gaze beyond the rain-drenched streets
To [the Land] where my heart lies

And as I watch the drops of rain
Weave their weary paths and die
I know that l am like the rain
There, but for the grace of you, go I

hitler hated slavs and saw them as untermensch, to be enslaved, liquidated…

Slavs were generally considered Untermensch, yes, and particularly so for certain population groups exhibiting Mongolian/Asiatic genetic admixture, i.e., Vladimir Lenin; enslavement/liquidation of Slavic peoples was not an objective of Hitler/NS Germany.

The root cause of the civilizational/technological underdevelopment of Eastern Europe/most of Russia throughout modern history compared to the rest of Europe is just NOT a mystery, just as everybody knows damn well why black Africa is a perpetual den of Neolithic iniquity and mud-huttery – certain people (groups) do better because they are better. Some people do better by virtue of living amongst or under the direction of better people.

pushed off his lebensraum

Lebensraum was not a policy for conquering or colonizing Russia or Europe. How many ethnic Germans had long been/were residing to the east of Germany-proper after WW1?

Did the noble Russians invade Finland for Lebensraum? What about the Soviet invasions of Ukraine; Georgia; Poland; Estonia; Latvia; Lithuania; Romania – what was the purpose? So, who gets to Take Up (new) Space, as a matter of necessity, and who does not? Let’s ask Emmanuel Celler, Barbara Spectre, and David Schwarz, shall we?

in exactly the same way israeli ashcan nazis see palestinians.

Blasphemy!

Israelis are just like the Nazis! Yes, that’s what Hudson says…his ideological/marxist/jew-y/inclusive slant notwithstanding.

In what way was NS Germany exactly the same as the Israelis have been in Palestine?

according to you, he had to kill 27 million russians to save them from the jewish bolshevists

Did I say that?

I think it’s accurate to assert that Germany was more opposed to Soviet/Bolshevik Russia than to Russian Russia:

In delivering Russia over to Bolshevism, Fate robbed the Russian people of that intellectual class which had once created the Russian State and were the guarantee of its existence…For centuries Russia owed the source of its livelihood as a State to the Germanic nucleus of its governing class. But this nucleus is now almost wholly broken up and abolished. The Jew has taken its place.
[…]
It must never be forgotten that the present rulers of Russia are blood-stained criminals, that here we have the dregs of humanity which, favoured by the circumstances of a tragic moment, overran a great State, degraded and extirpated millions of educated people out of sheer blood-lust, and that now for nearly ten years they have ruled with such a savage tyranny as was never known before. It must not be forgotten that these rulers belong to a people in whom the most bestial cruelty is allied with a capacity for artful mendacity and believes itself to-day more than ever called to impose its sanguinary despotism on the rest of the world. It must not be forgotten that the international Jew, who is to-day the absolute master of Russia, does not look upon Germany as an ally but as a State condemned to the same doom as Russia.

The menace to which Russia once succumbed is hanging steadily over Germany. Only a bourgeois simpleton could imagine that Bolshevism can be tamed.

Today Germany is the next battlefield for Russian Bolshevism…

The struggle against the Jewish Bolshevization of the world demands that we should declare our position towards Soviet Russia. [Adolf Hitler]

So, Russians paid the price for allowing Jewry, via Bolshevism, to get the whip-hand over Russia. Whilst not so overtly done in 1940’s Anglo-Saxon America, American Jewry asserted political/economic dominance over America and thereby gave us quite a few lashings, and we have been suffering for our folly ever since. Anglo-Saxons in America aren’t so easily manipulated and exploited by overt methods as Russian peasants, hence the necessity of an extreme demographic change which has been championed by Jewry through every channel of influence and power in our society.

Germany paid the price for trying to save us all.

the reason he didn’t want to attack europe, was the fact that most rolled over like the cheese eating surrender monkeys in vichy france and marched with him on moscow

What? Only PooBear has displayed a greater level of asininity in commentary than what you spouted-off in this twaddle.

all forms of exceptionalism are wrong

Sure, according to Peoples who display very little in the way of exceptionalism. But, no, the acknowledgement of exceptionalism, generally, is not wrong, depending upon the nature of it, of course. Can we stop pretending that the dilemma of exceptionally stupid vs. exceptionally smart is truly subject to relativism? Is there really room for determining which state of being is better?

1. thank god for the russian people, 2. that hate you nazi bastards.

1. To the extent that the Russians are fighting against an expanding Judaic hegemony, which has indeed already entrenched itself within America/much of Europe, I hope Russia prevails. How much of Russia actually remains Slavic/Orthodox Christian, anyway? Ukraine seems more ethnically European, but Zelenskyy is not Ukrainian, so it’s hard to know what’s really going on, other than the attempt of Israel/Organized Jewry to establish an “aircraft carrier” in Europe via Ukraine. I’m not so sure Russia isn’t participating in the charade – you know, New Lies For Old. And, either way, fewer Ukrainians, aka ethnic Europeans, seems to be the ultimate objective.

2. There’s no other sort of bastard that I’d like to be.

You Slavic bastards will be going down with the rest of us…

Well, PooBear, it would be useful and worthwhile if the actual reality and truth of NS Germany/WW2 was actually known; the central tenets of National Socialism, if implemented throughout Europe/America, would never have produced the political, ethnic, and cultural dystopia that now surrounds us all.

So, Michael Hudson is invoking Nazis! for what ails the world in 2025. An intended “Nazi” Alliance is what we should fear most? Whose we?

The “Nazis” did NOT want war with Europe. The “Nazis” hated the Russian Bolsheviks, whose founders/administrators were NOT mostly ethnic Russians, and the “Nazis” hated the outward manifestations and machinations of the anti-Gentile/Christian Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, which included the rise of Jewish Bolshevism/Communism, and for God’s sake, I wonder when Michael Hudson will speak or write on the historical and current Jewish disposition of hatred and fear of an Organized Goyim? Cattle, are we?

Yes, Mr. Hudson, race hatred and bigotry have no place in a well-functioning society – just ask the global HIAS (Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society) gurus; ask the ADL and their world-wide network of flying Jews who meet with world leaders, sometimes secretly, to demand a free hand in legislating for sanctioned political/economic/cultural parasitism of non-Whites in White host societies and to invoke Never Again!, ad nauseam, against the hosts who seem to have a clue; ask Barbara Spectre (Jews will be resented for their role in this [mocha melting pot] transformation…) a world-wide mocha melting pot is the solution, apparently. The solution for what, though?

The war in Ukraine is essentially a fight over racism and racist philosophy, is it? Between which races? Slav vs. Slav? What a load of crap….

America is indeed on the wrong path, but Hudson is just a crap master – After his graduation, he entered the University of Chicago with two majors: Germanic philology and history:

Michael Hudson was born on March 14, 1939, in Minneapolis. His father, Nathaniel Carlos Hudson…became an active Trotskyist trade unionist… Michael Hudson graduated from the University of Chicago…After graduation, he worked as an assistant to Jeremy Kaplan (1) at the Free Press (2) in Chicago – He managed to obtain the rights to the English language editions of the works of György Lukács (3) as well as the rights to the archives and works of Leon Trotsky… He was assistant professor of economics at the New School for Social Research (4).

1 & 2) Jeremiah Kaplan co-founded the original Free Press (a book publisher, not a newspaper) in 1947 with Charles Liebman, focusing on civil liberties, religion, and social science. They chose the name Free Press because they wanted to print books devoted to civil liberties. As a teenager, he [Kaplan] was active in the Young Peoples Socialist League, the youth wing of the Socialist Party. Not long after Kaplan’s graduation from New York City’s Seward Park High School, Seymour Martin Lipset (5), hired him to be the Young Socialists’ national chairman and sent him to Chicago to organize young people in the country’s heartland.

3) Lukács was born Bernát György Löwinger in Budapest, Austria-Hungary, to the investment banker József Löwinger…who were a wealthy Jewish family… [Lukács ] was a Hungarian Marxist philosopher… He was one of the founders of Western Marxism… He was also a philosopher of Leninism. He ideologically developed and organised Vladimir Lenin’s pragmatic revolutionary practices into the formal philosophy of vanguard-party revolution.

4) The New School for Social Research (NSSR), previously known as The University in Exile and The New School University – The New School for Social Research was founded in 1919 by a group of progressive intellectuals… In response to the Nazi Germany’s 1933 Civil Service Restoration Act, an act that dismissed over 1,200 Jewish or radical academics from German state-run institutions, Alvin Johnson raised $120,000 from Hiram Halle to create a “University in Exile” at The New School consisting of the dismissed European academics….A second wave of academics fleeing Europe after France fell to the Nazis in 1939 included…

5) Lipset was born in Harlem, New York City, the son of Russian Jewish immigrants. “I was in that atmosphere where there was a lot of political talk,” Lipset recalled, “but you never heard of Democrats or Republicans; the question was communists, socialists, Trotskyists, or anarchists. It was all sorts of different left wing groups.” From an early age, Seymour was active in the Young People’s Socialist League, “an organization of young Trotskyists that he would later head.”

The rest of the world seems to be blind to the fact that World War II did not end….it’s not missiles that are destroying/will destroy the Western World.

NS Germany = Organized Goyim

Happy New Year, meine Kröte. Please get a clue…

The most precious possession you have in this world is your own people. And for this people, and for the sake of this people, we will struggle and fight, and never slacken, never tire, never lose courage, and never lose faith.

For the third time here, high levels of government spending stimulated the German economy temporarily. These high levels of spending were not sustainable, though, over the long term. The German government ran through all its gold reserves, selling them off, and started running deficits….an economic collapse eventually, just as Marxist Russia later did and the United States is now in the process of doing.

Where do you get your information on NS Germany? From Goy’s Guide To What Happened In Germany according to Greenblatt, Spielberg, Ignatiev, Weizmann, Warburg & Rothschild?

“Marxist” Russia and today’s United States was/is contending with undue influences and staggering levels of parasitism exerted upon our governments and institutions by hostile and alien elements, i.e., AIPAC; Somalis in Minnesota; Haitians in Ohio; Mestizos in the Southwest; subsaharan Africans everywhere. Tsarist Russia was subverted by non-Russian agents – Jews, Mongols, Tatars, Georgians, etc. We would not be spiraling, economically and culturally, as we are if we had remained White Nationalists.

Germany, at least, was comprised of Germans. THAT was their greatest strength – ethnic solidarity.

The National Socialist Government has resisted the easy way out of their economic and exchange difficulties by [not] borrowing abroad after the manner of other European countries…

This policy of self-sufficiency, or, as our [English] Press call it, “economic isolation”, is, perhaps, a reason of the unpopularity of Germany in the City, the world’s biggest moneylender, an unpopularity which is reflected in our Press and in The Banker.
[…]
In fact the figures confirm the conclusion come to by other observers, that Germany has been satisfied to create and equip an army sufficient for defence, and has no projects of foreign conquest.

Since this date Germany has been compelled most unwillingly to fresh expenditure on armaments owing to the vast sums being spent by Great Britain and France…and if at the next election here the Labour Party came in they would probably take the first opportunity to force war on Germany.

The difficult position in which Germany is placed by the heavy reparations she had to pay…When she had been bled to the last sixpence, and her economic ruin completed by the occupation of the Ruhr, she was left with a heavy external debt which had to be repaid some time and on which the interest was due.

In spite of her economic distress she has never adopted the facile expedient of repudiating her debt, and has paid off one third of the capital sum. We [England] cancelled a thousand millions of the debt France owed to us, and also cancelled large sums due from Italy and Belgium, and we still owe four hundred millions to the United States and are neither repaying the capital nor paying the interest. The Soviet not only repudiated the debt of the former government, but confiscated wholesale the property of companies in Russia financed by foreign capital. It has been usual for countries after a revolution to repudiate the debts of the former government, and the Nazi government might well have followed this practice; on the contrary they assumed the whole burden, have done their best to pay the interest due, and have also taken over the Austrian debt…Germany is one of the very few countries who faced financial ruin as a result of the war and who are honestly meeting their obligations to the best of their ability.

They have also not adopted the device of depreciating their currency which has been done by so many other countries, having restored the gold mark after the disastrous financial crash.

Having to meet their foreign commitments, and having been deprived of their last ounce of gold by their foreign creditors, they have to control very strictly exports and imports and to prevent any capital leaving Germany. They have also been compelled by their financial position to enter bargains with foreign countries by which they exchange goods directly for goods…This has been described by Mr. Hudson in the House of Commons as an unfair method of trading and he has advised an economic war against Germany to compel them to abandon this method of trading which is forced upon them by their creditors in the city of London and in New York…

Germany has not only had a political revolution but has carried out an economic revolution in her method of calculating wealth. All other countries still adopt gold as their standard but Germany, deprived of gold, is calculating wealth in terms of labour production, a new method which is worthy of the study of economists.

When the Nazi party came into power they adopted the very bold policy of putting everyone to work by means of government credits. The result of this policy has been very remarkable. The government money being used to promote vast schemes of road building and land reclamation, the demand of these men for food and other products stimulated other industries and the national income increased so rapidly, that it has been possible to convert this government credit into loans based upon savings, and today far from having any unemployed, Germany has had to import labour, while by every figure by which the prosperity of a country can be tested the national wealth is steadily rising.

When they first proposed to provide work by means of government credit, they were told by the economists that this would result in an immediate rise of prices, but owing to the control of prices exercised by the government no such rise in prices has taken place. At every stage in these bold and new economic experiments the economists have prophesied disaster, and have been proved to be wrong…

Moreover, while other nations are spending more and more on armaments, Germany is directing her efforts to increasing the productivity of her soil, and the development of new and valuable products which the genius of her chemists is extracting synthetically from her two raw materials – coal and wood…[Arthur Pillans Laurie, The Case For Germany, 1939]

One of the most influential and widely read American economists of the twentieth century was John Kenneth Galbraith. He was an advisor to several presidents…He…taught economics at Harvard University. With regard to Germany’s record, Galbraith wrote: “… The elimination of unemployment in Germany during the Great Depression without inflation — and with initial reliance on essential civilian activities — was a signal accomplishment. It has rarely been praised and not much remarked…”

“…large scale borrowing for public expenditures, and at first this was principally for civilian work — railroads, canals and the Autobahnen. The result was a far more effective attack on unemployment than in any other industrial country.” – “By late 1935, unemployment was at an end in Germany. By 1936, high income was pulling up prices or making it possible to raise them … Germany, by the late thirties, had full employment at stable prices. It was, in the industrial world, an absolutely unique achievement.” – “Hitler also anticipated modern economic policy by recognizing that a rapid approach to full employment was only possible if it was combined with wage and price controls.”

THE TRUTH ABOUT HITLER, The Strand Magazine, 
November 1935
, By Winston Spencer Churchill

[…] then it was that one Austrian corporal, a former house-painter, set out to regain all.

… he has succeeded in restoring Germany to the most powerful position in Europe, and not only has he restored the position of his country, but he has even, to a very large extent, reversed the results of the Great War. Sir John Simon, as Foreign Secretary, said at Berlin that he made no distinction between victors and vanquished. Such distinctions, indeed, still exist, but the vanquished are in process of becoming the victors, and the victors the vanquished. When Hitler began, Germany lay prostrate at the feet of the Allies. He may yet see the day when what is left of Europe will be prostrate at the feet of Germany. Whatever else may be thought about these exploits, they are certainly among the most remarkable in the whole history of the world.

coercive hierarchies are not inevitable, but the bureaucratized, militarized, professionalized, credentialized institutions created…did indeed produce coercive hierarchies.

Hierarchies exist amongst all living creatures and in all aspects of life, whether naturally occurring or constructed; they will never be eliminated, ultimately. I suppose coercive hierarchies are an aspect specific to humans/human nature, particularly amongst those One World types, like the Bolsheviks/Vulture Capitalists (aka disproportionately Jewish) and the WhiteLady-Lesbian Addams types, who insist, either through collectivism/violence/death or by influence of public policy/voluntary institutions, that We all toe the (their) line for the greater good of a society/civilization; and unfortunately, human nature is what it is, and we live in an organized society, so we need to carefully select which humans rule over us and who lives amongst us. The truth is – not all human breeds are suited for a European civilization, and that’s exactly why most of the “unsuitable” seek to overthrow the long-established White Man hierarchy/patriarchy. And, once they do, another hierarchy will be established. In fact, it’s already here.

So, from which professionalized/credentialized institution did you learn physics? These academic institutions are also a product of an organized human civilization, yes? A beneficial/successful organization/institution requires some sort of hierarchical order. These myriad institutions in America/Europe would be easier to manage/regulate if they were all directed by a like People, don’t you think? They may not be perfect, but they wouldn’t be what they have recently become, in my opinion. The upward/progressive trajectory of our once beneficial institutions, like that of our Constitutional Republic, has taken a downward/backwards turn lately, yes? Is there no common thread for causation to be observed? It’s happening the same all over the western worlds….was there a world-wide emancipation that set the One World roiling over the Old World?

I’m afraid that you are confessing that you had a very, very bad education — I assume in the American public schools?

I don’t disagree, and that was my point. I attended both private and public schools in America, btw. Mainstream history is what we obviously learn in school.

Mainstream history/information, via print or broadcast, is slanted against truth, accuracy, and against the very People who created the best of the modern world – said People, whom we desperately need in large enough numbers to continue accordingly. So, why does a nation deliberately lower the standards of education for their populace? It’s certainly done, locally, these days to cater to the Idiots Amongst Us, all of whom where brought here disproportionately by/under the influence of the CellerPeople, but I digress – why is America dumbing-down their own people/their own future leaders and innovators? There are Federal directives, too, like No Child Left Behind, that impact all higher-achieving students negatively. It makes no sense, unless…it’s deliberate, and it’s of malicious intent.

Everything you mentioned has been very, very well-known to anyone interested in history for a very, very long time. I knew about it all long, long ago, back when I was a kid.

I am well aware, and that was my point. Once I started seeking data/books, on various subject matters, published in prior centuries or at least before 1950/1960, I was astonished to learn what was actually well known all along. Again, what is the purpose of rewriting/obscuring our history? Why is it now slanted, always, against our foundational population(s) and the accomplishments/ideals thereof? You never answer this question or assert an hypothesis on why/how we seem to be hellbent on destroying ourselves and our legacies (beyond blaming busybody WhiteLadies with no real power; the effects of Prohibition; Evangelical Christians, who are attached, irreparably, to Jewry/Israel, who wield no significant power/influence in American society/government, according to you) thereby leading to the destruction of our future in order to reparate for our (false) dismal past. So, how did we arrive to our current societal dilemma wherein indigenous ways of knowing supersede the benefits of the World Brought To Us By The White/European Man? Aeronautical Engineering vs. Twerking & Shootin’ (a White Man’s technology, btw) In Tha’ Hood? How do we choose? Why is this choice even presented in 2025? Did we really do this to ourselves?

my dad had this shtick he loved to repeat where he pretended to be FDR and state, “I hate war! My wife Eleanor hates war! And I hate my wife Eleanor!” And then Dad would crack up each time.

That’s a charming story. My grandfather, who was an American pilot in Europe during WW2, referred to FDR as That Sorry Lying Bastard. He also reported that the Germans were not who/what they were reported to have been.

FDR intentionally pushed the US into WW II.

That is yet another historical narrative that has been obscured from the mainstream. Hardly anyone knows this today. If they do know, they say it was for purely economic reasons; Samuel Untermyer and the BrainTrust said otherwise…Yet, Hitler pulled his nation out of the economic mire without a war. How so? THAT fact/answer is generally unknown, as well.

And, if one asks – What exactly were the Germans really trying to achieve for Germany/Europe, and why, exactly, was Jewry, as a collective, in their crosshairs, and is it really possible to drag 5, 7, 10,000 corpses, with the hook end of a cane, out of a refurbished gas chamber, designed and constructed by Germans with an entry point protected by an unsealed wooden door and unsealed ceiling cut-outs, and then incinerate them all to ash, 3-4 or 8-10 per cremation oven muffle, in approximately 24 hours? – Well, one is an antisemite just for asking, and one deserves criminal prosecution just for asking. And, it’s all on us, who work so hard to prevent the asking…,sure.

1. Almost all beautiful, wonderful, plausible theories that humans come up with, including theories invented by scientists, turn out to be wrong. 2. Eliminate natural science and most of you die.

1. I am well aware.

2. I don’t argue against natural science or science, in general. We must take the good aspects of innovations in science and technology with the bad, although I think our scientific progress has become somewhat corrupted/destructive particularly in the medical/pharmaceutical fields. Sharing the technologies with the tempest-tossed is problematic, too. Furthermore, the communication/surveillance technologies, which we willingly use today for the “sake of convenience,” will be used against us by our obviously rogue government and the Oligarchs who collude with/support the rogue Deep State that you often mention. Didn’t Larry Ellison (J) specifically say the upside of his surveillance technology was to keep us all on our best behavior? The BlackRock guy, Larry Fink (J), said the mass of corporations under his management could/would be made to comply with certain social and environmental standards by forcing behaviors to achieve diversity and inclusion goals. (He’s got his tentacles into 95% of the Fortune 500, yes?) But, I’m sure the prevalence of Jewry in these endeavors and organizations is of No Significance Whatsoever.

abolish the Fed, wipe out the Deep State, etc.

I do not disagree here. Can you admit that from inception, both institutions were/are infested with busybody-Jews to a disproportionate degree? Jews love them some central banking; FDR’s (kosher) Brain Trust was assembled before he became president – Jews love them some inordinate political and money power/influence to rule amongst/over people (a nation) they despise, to various degrees, of course, whilst claiming they care for us/humanity and/or claiming perpetual victimhood/defense. I don’t deny that European People seek power and influence; I deny that they do it, generally, with the cognizant notion of destroying the foundations of the Old Order and changing (ruining) European society in a manner that defenestrates the People who created it/sustain it in the first place.

European/Germanic George W. Bush spoke of bringing about a New World Order – thank goodness 911 and Lucky Larry Silverstein (J) came along to propel us forward in that direction by leaps and bounds. Did Bush know/suspect he was a pawn in the New World Order implementation or was he in on it all along? Does he realize the implications of an actual world order? I have no idea…either way, he was/is beholden to/in peril of/allied with Our Greatest Ally, whose current leader openly says Amalek must be defeated. They say the same about Edom. You/we can snigger at this biblical mumbo jumbo, but they live it and often admit that they do.

Yes, the evangelical Christians stupidly collude with Judea against their own nations, and I despise them for their stupid beliefs and actions, but Europe is facing precisely the same issues as we are in America, and Europe is not evangelical, so…what’s going on?

abolish the Fed, wipe out the Deep State, etc.

How so?

But, be aware – Judea will declare war upon whomever seeks to free themselves from the danger within – they have and will do so on behalf of whomever it is that is operating from within, which of course, isn’t them (Jewry), but they advocate, always, for whomever has burrowed within the Lands of Gentile Europa, which is never them, although, historically, they were the only substantial aliens within Europa, until the last few decades, but it was/is never them…

You think the Jews have seized all the levers of power in America?

And, you seem to think that busybody-Lesbian-WhiteLadies and Teetotalers inflict more damage to American/European society than this:

“Just last week, leaders of the world’s seven largest Jewish communities convened in Australia as part of the 2025 J7 summit. This is a summit organized by ADL as part of the J7 task force to combat antisemitism – a convening of representative bodies of the largest Jewish communities on Earth.”

“So, the J7… is comprised of the seven largest diaspora communities. We meet every other week, via zoom, to share information, to share best practices, we share what worked for our communities, what hasn’t worked, what might work elsewhere. We have shared tips [for] draft[ing] legislation that might work in other countries or spoken of different litigation, a lot of what has been very important has been this consultation where we can learn from each other, learn the trends that are coming in, learn the techniques that others have used successfully, and [to ascertain] what might be coming our way…We do speak in one voice on certain aspects on key advocacy…when we left Australia, our call to action was on the Australian government to move forward…[with our special envoy’s plan] on antisemitism, which has been stalled for a number of months, to accept it and to implement it…Finally, we have meetings that are some off the record, some on the record, with world leaders, in which we share our communities concerns and call for action…”
[Jonathan Greenblatt (J) and Susan Heller Pinto (J), Anti-Defamation League, December 18, 2025]

So, Dave, they are telling us, outright, that they WILL NOT permit us to organize our nations in any way they find unsuitable or not beneficial to Jewish interests.

I simply fail to see how prohibition had the same deleterious effect on us as this:

From the Jewish Virtual Library:
US Representative of NY, Emanuel Celler (J), made his first major speech on the House floor during the consideration of the Johnson Immigration Act of 1924…. This “national origins” system was structured to discriminate against… Yiddish-speaking Jews. The Johnson Act of 1924, which Celler opposed….virtually [eliminated] all immigrants other than those from England, France, Ireland, and Germany.

The Johnson Act passed… Despite this setback, Celler had found his cause, and for the next four decades, he advocated eliminating national origin as a basis for immigration restriction….

Celler’s determination to fight U. S. immigration quotas was particularly reinforced one Sunday during World War II when a bearded rabbi came to his home…. The rabbi… spoke forcefully to Celler. “Don’t you see, can’t you see?” the rabbi asked, “Won’t you see that there are millions — millions — being killed. Can’t we save some of them? Can’t you, Mr. Congressman, do something?” Celler equivocated, averring that President Roosevelt had told him that he sympathized with the Jewish plight but could not divert ships being used to transport war material and soldiers to bring in refugees. The rabbi’s reply moved Celler to tears: “If six million cattle had been slaughtered,” he observed, “there would have been greater interest.”

One World, One Voice – there it is.

You need to try to disprove your own beloved pet theories. And you are not trying to do that.

Look around, Dave Miller, the evidence of the probability of the accuracy of my pet theories reveals itself just about everywhere.

Sure, at least at one point, Jews largely controlled Tinseltown. So what?

Don’t they still control Hollywood? Did you catch that Blockbuster on the Holodomor?

Here’s what –

Marvin Chomsky, Director – Jewish
John Erman, Director – John Erman (1935–2021) was an American director and producer known for his work on prominent television projects like Roots and The Attic: The Hiding of Anne Frank. While his professional work often explored Jewish themes…
David Greene, Director – Jewish
Gilbert Moses, Director – Jewish
David Wolper, Executive Producer – Jewish

So, storytelling and American media have no influence on American politics or culture? While not technically a Tinseltown production, the above Jews brought us the (historically inaccurate) historical miniseries and battering-ram called ROOTS, wherein not a single slave seller/slave holder had a surname such as Benjamin or Moses, nor was there a reference to original (crypto) Jewish slavers from Spain, Amsterdam, etc.

So, maybe slavery, racism, and land theft, as singular international crimes of the White Man, are the ONLY historical matters about which we have been miserably misled. Of course, those who have always known otherwise, such as yourself, did absolutely nothing to stop the undermining of your/our history, and now, most of you are gone; too old; too busy fooling yourselves on your culpability, or that of your parents, for what happened right under your noses after America participated, under false pretenses and outright lies, in the destruction of the last Defenders of Europa in the mid 20th century. Our once Anglo-Saxon country is now full of tempest-tossed refuse who care NOT for European society, as they are mostly ignorant ingrates, nor are they capable of the higher thinking and intellectual analysis/dedication required to understand and thereby claw our way out of the mess that was mysteriously instigated/created by Teetotalers and Bleeding Heart White Lesbian Ladies of yore.