Thanks for the link. This is exactly why I consider anti-vaxxers to be such totally ridiculous people.
After reviewing the data in this article, I can confirm that the info in the tweet is very accurate.
Excerpt from Excess mortality hits +16%, highest 2022 value so far:
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/ddn-20220916-1
Regarding this article:
https://www.unz.com/runz/confronting-the-cowardice-of-the-far-right-on-race/?showcomments#comments
Gang violence in Black neighborhoods stretches at least as far back as the 1920s. Issues like police brutality, hate crimes and race riot have persisted even longer, since the 1800s. Nevertheless, America retained its status as a 1st world country for as long as blacks and native americans were a small minority.
With a Hispanic majority, the country could still be fairly prosperous but the overall quality of life would suffer substantially. All the aforementioned issues + many, many more. Hispanics lock arms with White Nationalists not to gang up on blacks, but to limit their own numbers in the U.S. You’ve been repeating this false notion for years that American White Nationalism is really about sticking it to blacks, without taking into account that historically blacks were the only group large enough to be the object of anyone’s contempt, and they themselves only support immigration because it diverts some of the attention away from them.
America’s as segregated as it possibly can be, bro. So just because whites spend a lot of time thinking about Black people doesn’t mean that they actually interact with them regularly. Understand? I’m sure it’s fun to fantasize about all white regions and countries, things you already have in abundance, but an America completely free of “Blacks” would have far reaching and unforseen consequences that go beyond matters of public safety.
White Americans, with all 50 of their states, only behave as one people when given an “out group” to brutalize, exploit and endlessly obsess about. Even then, there’s very little unity around miscellaneous politics. I’m asking you to use your 15 point IQ advantage to think harder about how society might resolve issues like crime, disparate outcomes in schooling, etc. If you can’t, at least accept the inevitable dissolution of the union. But please, say something more insightful than “we need to learn to live without Blacks.”
America will never be as mixed as Brazil, although the multiracial population will increase with time and the Black population will have a little more White ancestry.
A billion pre-Americans in Africa may disagree.
America will never be as mixed as Brazil.
Yuck, whites are obsessed with race. You’re like the Africans coming here to start “beefs” with other Blacks except, with whites it’s not tribe but race.
A U.S. Black country would look more like the West Indies. Most of the Island countries have a small number of whites, but they’re not allowed to promote the more toxic elements of their culture, like racism, pedophilia, etc. They’re allowed to stay as long as they’re serving a useful purpose, by bringing in skills that the locals don’t have. They are 3rd world countries with decent infrastructure that produce enough food to take care of themselves. I imagine American Blacks would run their own country in a similar fashion. Being descended from slaves, they are a little more docile than people straight from Africa, and so their countries, while poor, are going to be considerably more stable than those in Africa.
Anyway, if Blacks feel like taking states in the South there’s just nothing you can do. You can’t fight a “race war” or legally implement segregation. Not without drawing backlash from your adversaries in Russia and China. And that’s the thing you white nationalists are too dumb to understand. Race relations in America are all tied into international politics.
The reason Whites hate Blacks is because Africa is poor. It’s not about IQ, and it’s not about crime. IQ was debunked a long time ago, and the vast majority of Whites live in neighborhoods where everyone is White.
The focus on American Blacks, the so-called 13%…the so-called Black problem,as Whites like to say… is a bit illusory. For whatever problems they pose, they’ve never prevented America from becoming a first world country. A superpower even.
For decades Whites have been fantasizing about Blacks being “outmaneuvered” and “out hustled” by Latino adversaries. It never happens because, the simple fact of the matter is Latinos are not interested in politics to same extent as Blacks, in part because they know it would generate a lot of hostility from Whites. In California Latinos outnumber Blacks by a pretty wide margin, yet the latter group is more impactful in the political arena. Even in Compton, a city that’s been majority Latino for the past 20 years, Blacks continue to hold most the political power.
Nobody doubts that Latinos want to be at the forefront of investment, representation and the like, but advocating for it runs too big a risk of ruffling White feathers. If anyone doubts this, just observe the guaranteed income experiments taking place in select cities across the country; they were largely organized by Black activists and politicians with Latinos being notably absent from the movement.
Typically, whites shoot up churches or expose themselves to kids when they need to blow off steam. I’m not recommending this, just saying. It is part of your culture…
Wow! Your article really illustrates a fundamental difference in thinking between Africans and American Blacks. To the African, whose mentality is naturally one of tribalism, organizing along ethnic lines is tantamount to plotting genocide; to the American Black, it’s nothing more than a (very) basic commitment to uplifting the collective, a notion that’s been historically absent in African societies, where the credo is more along the lines of “every man for himself.”
The author expresses shock over the mere possibility that Blacks can trust each other enough to participate in organized crime, followed by disdain for a Black judge who belongs to a sorority that emphasizes helping her community.
It really shows why Africans can be super intelligent and ambitious, but fail at creating societies with even the most basic functionalities. To the people who govern those countries, the end game is protecting one’s personal interests, disregarding those of the collective, and always being in potentially violent conflict with people from some other tribe. That way of life is simply not conducive to creating a modern society, no matter the IQ of its practitioners.
To white people we’re all the same, but, to anyone Black whose ethnic identity was formed in the colonies of the new world, it’s very clear that the experience of slavery, and Jim Crow in the case of American Blacks, allowed them to cooperate just a wee bit better than people directly from Africa. Say what you will, but the American black people, those descended from slavery and subsequently Jim Crow, actually have the greatest potential of any Black population to create a decent country, precisely because they’ve suffered the most oppression of all Blacks and consequently are more “ethnocentric,” as Chisala would say.
Granted, it wouldn’t be a first world country, just a place with paved roads, electricity, running water and a system of agriculture that produces enough food. It might look something like the West Indies but with a little more wealth, but the point is it would have something going for itself. Potential, rather than the lingering sense of despair that permeates most of Africa.
This is one of those contrafactual canards that turns the truth on its head.
Nope. Whites have always been obsessed with race.
Nope. Your entire culture and way of life revolves around race. You think about it 24/7.
I then replied to you:
I am politically independent. Whoever, whatever, and wherever I am, I speak only for myself.
You replied by patently assuming that I am white, and by insinuating that my very unusual racial opinions represent the whole of the white race:White people—or more properly excluding other Caucasoids, Aryans are by nature race-blind xenophiles. Smart people of other races actually sneer at them for this. I consider it to be a genetic flaw; it demonstrably makes Aryans evolutionarily unfit for survival in today’s world.
Nope. Whites have always been obsessed with race.
[...]
Anyone who has studied the history of India knows well that Aryans tend towards egalitarianism and miscegenation—even when the wiser members of their race have tried to prevent that eventuality, and even when they endowed their segregation systems with the authority of religion.
Whence spring your racist assumptions?
Nope. Your entire culture and way of life revolves around race. You think about it 24/7.
…And obsessed with children too smh. Why are all of the perps white in a city that’s over 50% black.
The fact is no black on white murder ever becomes a national morality play
No need, since the murderers are brought to justice. White police and vigilantes kill black people with impunity.
Nope. Whites have always been obsessed with race.
This is one of those contrafactual canards that turns the truth on its head.
Nope. Whites have always been obsessed with race.
Don’t go ruining that man’s jerk off material.
It’s true that educated, higher earning black women have low fertility compared to women of other races. However, any dysgenic effect should be offset by white geneflow into the black population, given that black men are procreating interracially at a fairly high rate and about half of biracials marry a black spouse (according to pew research center). Consequently, American blacks in subsequent generations will carry a little more Euro genes than the current generation. Colorism is still very much alive, and so acquiring white genes, even at the bottom tier, might be regarded as progress more so than moving up the economic ladder.
It’s interesting how whites can spend so much time obsessing over blacks, but know so little about them. It’s not entirely your faults; people in multiracial societies tend to coexist, while not really interacting too often with folks from different races other than coworkers or maybe the occasional friend. Otherwise, you would know that the “blacks” complaining of racism are precisely those with high IQs or even just high levels of education, not the more typical “black” who’s either poor or working class and lives in a segregated neighborhood far away from white people.
Too many drama queens here, who’d swear the world is going to hell in a hand basket because he’s not allowed to express racism openly as his grandparents once proudly did. But really, what’s the worst anyone can say about multicultural America? Hate crimes, yeah…but it could be a lot worse. Riots? Yep.
All of that should be expected, given the history of this country. But is it really so bad that you loose sleep over these things and dedicate your whole lives to talking about your so-called “black problem”? Seriously, not to be mean but people of other races don’t sit around at the dinner table and talk about race. Everyone’s racist , but only white people do this kind of stuff. You’re committed to racialism in a way that other people aren’t, so it’s hard to understand for some of us. A way of life built around race.
Well, this statement is so full of certifiable stupidity, it has to at least be on the same level as a Zionist troll spouting the fake theology of "Judeo-Christianity" to turn Christians and Muslims against each other.Here's a fun question - what's more of an existential threat to an Asian American's grandparents, some woke propaganda BS about "white racism" or being bashed in the face without warning in a public place by a random sub-neanderthal retard?Asians know this.Replies: @Slimer
Asians know this, and that’s why they will continue to see whites as the real racists. You are, after all.
You forgot the third option: being rounded up and placed in an internment camp. Possibly one guarded by fat sweaty white dudes who’ve got a bad case of the yellow feva.
I don’t know. Looking back at my post history I’m beginning to realize I’ve been pretty adamant in saying, in one way or another over the years, that blacks are the superior ones…all things being equal. I’m not sure I believe in white supremacy enough to vilify it, or whatever it is that causes white people to be endlessly obsessed about race.
To be sure, everybody is born racist. But I can’t imagine blacks having such an abundance of money and power, and waking up in the morning fixated on whites. Or race at all for that matter. No way could black men in any substantial numbers dedicate their whole lives to blogging about how much they dislike other races. Or producing documentaries about race. And making songs about race. And writing books about race.
But it never stops with you people. It’s truly is a way of life, no different than confucianism or sharia law in the way its adherents fight tooth and nail to preserve the tenets they hold dear. Yeah, white liberals are a thing, but they’re utterly despised by the masses of whites, who seem them as traitors to be purged from the system on the day of the inexorable race war. In so many ways the white liberal, like everyone else, must kow tow to the violent cries of the ordinary white male, lest he get upset and lay waste to a kindergarten. Or a movie theater, or a church…you name it. Sorry, blacks don’t practice that form of racism. Neither do Asians or Arabs. To some extent Hispanics do, as their culture was founded upon notions of manifest destiny, etc. But yeah, that’s white people.
When the black kids attacked that homeless Asian man the black community raised money for the victim.
When the white boy shot up the massage parlor whites excused it by saying he was just having a bad day. When the white boy killed the Asian woman and her daughter whites responded by saying, “races ain’t ‘spose to mix.” Even more pathetic, you believe the violence is okay because blacks allegedly do it too.
https://people.com/crime/19-year-old-arrested-for-allegedly-stabbing-woman-daughter-to-death/
In fairness the kid in that video was smaller than the security guard. Kinda felt sorry for him at the end with the tears and all.
Anyway, it’s weird how some of these white dudes fantasize about Latinos swooping in to save them from the scary black brute.
This is strange.
Anyway, it’s weird how some of these white dudes fantasize about Latinos swooping in to save them from the scary black brute.
You won’t find any black politicians spouting hate towards others, because the simple fact of the matter is that that sentiment doesn’t resonate strongly with those they represent. Can one honestly say the same about white politicians? Could it be that, for white people, racism is more than some knee jerk hostility towards what’s foreign, but instead, a way of life they’ve been practicing for centuries on end? A sort of birthright to antagonize people they deem inferior to themselves. Can you see how that practice might be more offensive to an Asian than somebody calling them a chink and punching them in the face?
You have all the money in the world, all the cultural achievements anyone could ask for. And still, you’re fixated on race 24-7. White people are dedicated to race and racialism in a way that other people just aren’t. Asians know this, and that’s why they will continue to see whites as the real racists. You are, after all.
https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2021-vancouver-canada-asian-hate-crimes/
Well, this statement is so full of certifiable stupidity, it has to at least be on the same level as a Zionist troll spouting the fake theology of "Judeo-Christianity" to turn Christians and Muslims against each other.Here's a fun question - what's more of an existential threat to an Asian American's grandparents, some woke propaganda BS about "white racism" or being bashed in the face without warning in a public place by a random sub-neanderthal retard?Asians know this.Replies: @Slimer
Asians know this, and that’s why they will continue to see whites as the real racists. You are, after all.
You mean like the way it's always been for Asians?
Could it be that, for white people, racism is more than some knee jerk hostility towards what’s foreign, but instead, a way of life they’ve been practicing for centuries on end?
https://eacmar.iucea.org/ (Pure and Applied Math)
https://www.ceamitic.sn/personnel-denseignement-et-de-recherche/ (Math and ICT, French)
https://ceasma-benin.org/htdocs/home/ (Applied Math and Computer Science, French)
https://eaifr.ictp.it/ (Physics)
These research centers are fairly small given Africa’s purported population size, but the plan apparently is to scale them as African countries become more connected through infrastructure and have in place rules for more effectively sharing such resources.
I’d posit that sour attitudes about Africa generally stem from a tendency to view its countries in isolation, where they look weak, and any semblance of progress just seems too little too late. Envisaging them as all part of a single entity is often more insightful.
Regardless, one has to reconcile the IQ data with the fact that countries like Rwanda and Ethiopia require the majority of their college students to study STEM. Then of course there’s the data showing that African immigrants to the U.S. have IQs comparable to Eastern European immigrants, according to white nationalist John Fuerst, i.e. the UNZ commenter who calls himself Chuck. For this reason, one might predict that African countries of the near future will look something like Ukraine or Belarus, perhaps poor but a far cry from the desolate wastelands they appear to be today.
In only one case does he factor in the positive association between intelligence and physical attractiveness, in which case black men are rated most highly. Also, at the beginning of the paper you’ll notice he states how his research technique “has the added advantage of eliminating all random measurement errors that are inherent in any scientific measurement. ”
Here’s his webpage where you can email him for further details since you don’t accept the results.
https://www.lse.ac.uk/management/people/academic-staff/skanazawa
He’s good friends with a lot of prominent figures in the human biodiversity movement and idolizes many of the pioneers of race and IQ research. For all we known, his findings might be even more favorable to black men but he’s afraid to publish them for fear of being shunned by his academic circle. We all known you people are very selective about what kind of controversial research you’re willing to accept. The biodiversity stuff is all good and well as long as it makes insecure white men feel as if they’ve got an advantage over somebody, but if it makes them look vulnerable there must be something fishy about the technique.
Not to mention this other study where most of the female participants were college age white women:
https://orca-mwe.cf.ac.uk/28235/1/Lewis%202012.pdf
Although it’s not stated explicitly in the paper, the results imply that when IQ is more or less equal between races, as it is in the UK, black men are rated most attractive. The reason this truth is considered controversial is because white men will get hurt and go on killing sprees if it’s openly acknowledged.
Sexual advantage doesn’t mean penis size but having bones less prone to fracturing, as well as being perceived as cool and athletic. Low IQ essentially nullifies that advantage:
Evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa published research concluding that, “Net of intelligence, black men are significantly more physically attractive than nonblack men.”
So no, this isn’t really about IQ. It’s about sex.
30 volunteers had their brain activity measured.
The joint team of psychologists and computer scientists at the University of Helsinki in Finland used electroencephalography (EEG) measurements to catalogue which facial features people found to be attractive and then fed the results to a machine learning system called a generative adversarial neural network (GAN).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJ3U-6NQDQM
The system learned their preferences and catalogued their unique set of so-called EEG attraction identifiers. It then generated custom-designed faces to suit an individual's preferences.
I didn’t read your silly comment, just replying to say I’m sorry the truth hurts you so much.
Which again, is just another composition of the endless motif that only white racism and white this or that is the reason why every black man in the whole world isn't Idris Elba, sucking off Jews in order to get his haute-cuisine and access to Trudeau's wife.
A world where African countries are educated, fairly well off and dignified produces different outcomes. That’s why so many white men literally have to believe in race and IQ. For if IQ differences are fixed, so too is the sexual market.
Dude, you really just wrote a whole essay trying to debunk something obvious. The fact that you’re so triggered only reinforces the conclusions of those studies: that white men are really not all that masculine in comparison to black. A race of confident men who exude masculinity would respond by saying, “that’s okay, we don’t have to be number one at everything.” They’d be happy in all their glorious cultural achievements that paved the way for global domination, with little regard for another race of men that clearly have a sexual advantage.
Instead, you keep saying “oh it’s not true” and then proceed to change the subject. What’s worse is pretending that white men are downtrodden when they have a disproportionate share of power in the world. That is desperate lol.
Unless it was anonymized, it can't be considered legitimate. No student, particularly a white female, is ever going to risk being perceived as racist. That's why the Swedes make it so that everyone can see who someone voted for.
"The study, involving 40 undergraduate students, collated ratings of attractiveness of faces of 600 opposite-sex faces categorised by their race – black, white and Asian".
The sample size was 40 students. 40, undergraduate students at a modern university which teaches that black people are disadvantaged in the United Kingdom when Strand et al 2015 show they have a comparative advantage to whites due to their race in terms of educational attainment.
But in the latest research, academics devised and tested a mathematical formula of marriage behaviour on the back of the attractiveness data from the student sample, which produced the same patterns of mixed-race marriages found in government records.
It suggests no such thing.
The model also suggested that those taking part in mixed-race marriages are, on average, more attractive than those in same-race marriages.
Accusing foreigners of cheating is a pretty desperate way of coping. Better to just accept reality for what it is and move on.
As far as “sample size” is concerned, a small data set is all that’s needed if it provides you with a formula that predicts actual trends, as in the case of this study. There’s a reason white men are the biggest consumers of interracial porn and it’s not because the study is “stupid and flawed.”
Lastly, current statistics from online dating sites have to be interpreted in the context that black men are largely uneducated and poor, relegated to a victim status that stigmatizes them as being in perpetual need of outside assistance. A world where African countries are educated, fairly well off and dignified produces different outcomes. That’s why so many white men literally have to believe in race and IQ. For if IQ differences are fixed, so too is the sexual market.
Which again, is just another composition of the endless motif that only white racism and white this or that is the reason why every black man in the whole world isn't Idris Elba, sucking off Jews in order to get his haute-cuisine and access to Trudeau's wife.
A world where African countries are educated, fairly well off and dignified produces different outcomes. That’s why so many white men literally have to believe in race and IQ. For if IQ differences are fixed, so too is the sexual market.
Correction: World Bank funded 46 research centers in total, 24 in east/southern Africa and 22 in west/central Africa.
The folks who insist that Africans are divided are only partially correct, ignoring the myriad ways that pan – Africanism is practiced every day. It’s not merely lip service from corrupt officials looking to divert attention away from their short comings by pointing the finger at foreigners, but a form of collaboration among those Africans who have the greatest capacity to solve problems.
Pointing out that this conversation is really about sex always triggers the same response:
“oh, that’s not true.” Yet, there’s more evidence from the UK corroborating this very obvious fact.
Scientists from Cardiff University found differences in perception of attractiveness in different races, which could account for significant differences in which races tend to marry each other in the UK.
The team examined the preferences of a research group of students rating faces of the opposite sex and, using a mathematical formula devised from the results, found that it correlated closely with statistical trends of mixed-race marriages in the UK.
Black men in the study were found to be the most attractive to females based on facial characteristics, while Asian women were perceived to be most facially attractive to men.
https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/cardiff-university-scientists-reveal-role-2035728
Could this have something to do with Africans outperforming English whites on their own standardized tests? Hmmm, that’s what Kanazawa would predict anyway. Saying, “oh it’s not true” isn’t going to make it less true. It’s so sad to see scores of grown men congregating online, day in and day out, harping on about black men.Wasting their lives.
Unless it was anonymized, it can't be considered legitimate. No student, particularly a white female, is ever going to risk being perceived as racist. That's why the Swedes make it so that everyone can see who someone voted for.
"The study, involving 40 undergraduate students, collated ratings of attractiveness of faces of 600 opposite-sex faces categorised by their race – black, white and Asian".
The sample size was 40 students. 40, undergraduate students at a modern university which teaches that black people are disadvantaged in the United Kingdom when Strand et al 2015 show they have a comparative advantage to whites due to their race in terms of educational attainment.
But in the latest research, academics devised and tested a mathematical formula of marriage behaviour on the back of the attractiveness data from the student sample, which produced the same patterns of mixed-race marriages found in government records.
It suggests no such thing.
The model also suggested that those taking part in mixed-race marriages are, on average, more attractive than those in same-race marriages.
Not sure why Chanda Chisala continues to entertain defeated soy boys on the internet when the whole IQ discussion was never really about intelligence, but rather about sex. To quote the findings of a once prominent member of the race realist academic movement:
“Net of intelligence, black men are significantly more physically attractive than nonblack men.”
This means that as African countries become more educated, and their economies more developed, white men will loose their monopoly on the sexual market place. Black men will become more fetishized for being “masculine” much like East Asian women are fetishized for being “feminine”, inadvertently pushing white men down by a rung. Notice these alt-right dudes freely admit to being outperformed academically by Jews, Arabs, Asians and Indians, as they perceive them as geeky and lacking in sex appeal. Meanwhile these same alt righters imitate black slang because they think it sounds “cool.”
Africa will never match Europe in wealth or scientific scholarship, sadly, but its countries can prosper by revamping agriculture and investing in R & D. A good example is the world bank’s ACE program, which, in collaboration with African governments, established 20 or so pan – african research centers in areas crucial for economic development. As a successful business owner , a leader of sorts(?), this is the stuff Mr. Chasala ought to concern himself with; that is, helping his fellow country men rise out of poverty, not convincing white people that he’s just as intelligent as them. They know as much already. Time to act like it now and start building up your countries.
More brave, you meant. White men are chickens unless they’ve got a gun, and a room full of unarmed people to kill. Preferably children.
“They gave away the US manufacturing base to China in order to lower their labor costs and make boatloads of cash. They thought that China would remain a nice docile colony, like Mexico, but the Chinese had other ideas. Now China is becoming a rival to power for the US elites, and the US elites are starting to panic.”
Western governments allowed their manufacturing base to move to places like Japan, Korea and Taiwan in exchange for military and political influence in the region. Nobody does anything for free. It was part of a strategy of divide and rule that would yield returns for the west, even in the unexpected event that China opened up to capitalism and became a dominant player in the region. Worked like a charm, too. That’s why if Japan or one of the aforementioned countries sides with China over anything that goes against western interests, the white man need only to wag his finger and say “look at everything we’ve done for you,” and they put their heads down and fall in line.
I hope this is a troll attempt.
That’s why if Japan or one of the aforementioned countries sides with China over anything that goes against western interests, the white man need only to wag his finger and say “look at everything we’ve done for you,” and they put their heads down and fall in line.
Of course -- because, as you have so astutely pointed out, every other race/ people/ nation in the world, apart from the indigenous peoples of Europe, literally grew up out of the ground in the lands that they now inhabit, and remained in that spot forever, never migrating, invading, or colonizing other peoples' lands. It's like, SCIENCE, doncha know. Uh huh.I can't help but notice that those evil "White European" Turks still control Anatolia today. Should they give it back to the Greeks and return to their homelands?And those "White European" Bantus? They should give Africa back to the pygmies and Khoisan, right?https://infogalactic.com/info/Bantu_expansionIt's only fair. Probably should stop enslaving (and eating) the pygmies while they're at it...And of course you would agree that if the European diaspora returned to Europe, they should immediately expel all non-indigenous Europeans... right?I mean, clearly you're attempting to present an intellectually and morally consistent argument here, and not simply spewing virulent, unreasoning anti-White hatred in the form of a long-discredited semitic canard... right?Replies: @showmethereal
Or is imperialism and colonization a western value?
“And of course you would agree that if the European diaspora returned to Europe, they should immediately expel all non-indigenous Europeans… right?”
No see you don’t get my point… I am NOT against the mixing of races. I am against white supremacists. I am also against hypocrites. Every nation has a right to set its own immigration policy. But it is hypocritical for people of European descent to sail across oceans – conquer and take lands from others and then declare them as countries “for whites only”. If they wanted to live around only whites they should go back to Europe and give the countries they took back to the original inhabitants. If not – then they should shut up and not complain. And no – white supremacists should not be able to expel all non-indigenous Europeans if those people are in Europe legally. If they do go back to Europe and through their numbers influence the electorate and vote to close immigration – then hey no problem. But to forcibly remove non Europeans? No! Unless you all want to be 21st century Nazis all over again…?
“First they came for the Chinese,” it might be said.
No, first, they came for whites.
Here’s one of the conclusions of a study conducted by Satoshi Kanazawa, a prominent member of the human biodiversity movement:
“Net of intelligence, black men are significantly more physically attractive than nonblack men…”
Can you guys just admit that this is why you cling to the IQ stuff?
Evolution isn’t real either:
What really makes people uncomfortable are findings like this:
“Net of intelligence, black men are significantly more physically attractive than nonblack men…”
^^^ That’s according to Satoshi Kanazawa, a self-described proponent of human biodiversity and hardly someone you could call a “race denier.”
This is why so many white people, men in particular, can’t let go of the IQ nonsense – because they view black men as their biggest adversaries in the sexual market place, all things being equal. Luckily for whites, black people don’t spend a lot of time thinking about other races, so it’s a mistake to assume that since whites are obsessed with “competing” against blacks that blacks must be the same way. By the end of this century America won’t even have much of a black population, as most of them will have moved to African countries with rapidly developing economies, while the remaining African genes will just get absorbed into the general population. The reason it hurts white people to hear this is because they get aroused by the thought that all black men are lusting after their women, which isn’t really the case.
The top 2% of whites have done some good in the world; the bottom 98% are just here to take up space and be a drag on human progress. If you’re a white scientists, doctor or ceo, then you’re good – but the typical dopey white boy who goes around promoting racism and pedophilia, and bashing anyone who doesn’t want to participate? Sorry, nobody would care if you simply went extinct.
Hello Anonymous,
If you read closely you’ll notice I didn’t say “white nationalists are homos for black men” rather I said white MEN (meaning virtually all of them, or at least a solid majority of them) have some kind of homoerotic fetish for black men. The jist of your comment – that blacks don’t weight too heavily on the minds of ordinary white people, being essentially an afterthought among the masses of confident and broad-minded whites who’ve got bigger things to worry about – is indicative of a kind of white arrogance I’m all too familiar with.
It’s also not in line with reality. In reality, the average white person thinks about race a lot … and black people in particular. The whole notion of the white man’s burden, the idea that whites have a responsibility to “civilize” (exploit) the inferior races, is something that most white people take very seriously. It’s not some fringe ideology embraced by a woebegone minority, but the guiding principle of white behavior across the world for the past five centuries or so.
It’s what leads white people to constantly compare themselves to blacks, and to continue to propagate this violent narrative that they’re giving away all their money to black people, even though the opposite is true.
https://www.trtworld.com/magazine/why-is-africa-sending-money-to-help-rich-countries-develop-40226
As of now, Africa acts as a net creditor to the world, as do a number of Caribbean countries. That’s not to mention all the experiments showing that blacks are much more likely to give money to a begging white person than vice versa. Blacks are racist too, but in more of a xenophobic sense, not in the way of obsessively comparing themselves to whites and feeling like they’re in competition with them. The average black guy doesn’t look at white people and see them as his natural born enemies. Y’all claim it’s about IQ, but I’ve met a number of smart Africans and none of them think like that. They know how to compete, but they don’t feel like they’ve gotta “prove” that they’re better than anyone else. Their attitudes are more laid back … masculine even. Heck, if Africa had half the wealth Europe does, blacks would probably forget that other races exist. Too occupied with their music and pop culture to care about race. For whites, on the other hand, life is always a dick measuring contest. Literally.
They’ll see a black guy using the restroom by himself and walk up to the urinal right next to him, even when plenty of others are available for use, or fart when they walk past their black coworker and then make fun of her hair. That, I suspect, is why some black women are “dunking on white supremacists,” as you call it. Can’t speak for Asian men, but I’m sure they’ve got their own reasons. In any case, that you’re worried about someone “dunking on white supremacists” probably means that you identify with many of their beliefs? I don’t care either way, I just think we need to speak of the real root of white racialism instead of going on about IQ.
As for John John and Malla, I didn’t bother to read your silly comments guys. Nobody cares about macho culture, that’s corny lol. Black male culture might be savage, but for some reason it’s always imitated by these “macho men” who strut around calling themselves niggas.
As a matter of fact, I’ll ask him for you lol. Hey Ron, do you believe that black/white differences in IQ are genetic?
You all like to pretend that you’re some band of renegade intellectuals boldly confronting forbidden truths that frighten mainstream society, yet the moment somebody says something that offends you you cry foul? Like it or not, the whole world revolves around sex. White hostility towards blacks has always been about sexual competition. It’s not about IQ, public spending on welfare programs or development aid. It’s about sex and you know it.
The IQ crap has been debunked a thousands times over. Even the writer of this article, Mr Unz himself, debunked the whole notion that black/white differences in IQ scores are genetic. Don’t take my word for it though, you can ask him yourself. What more is there to say then? I’d rather tell the truth about white men’s homosexual urges for black cock than engage you on your terms, where we’d spend the rest of our lives arguing about something that nobody really cares about. More importantly, even if I engage you on matters of national debt and so forth, it’s not like you’re going to do anything about it. Seriously, are you actually going to log off of your computer and take some kind of action to correct the situation?
At this point, UNZ is basically publishing race articles that appeal to an audience he doesn’t identify with. He publishes this crap just to rile you fools up.
The other so-called “people of color” have their own reasons for hating on blacks, which is fine. Black people don’t care about that, they want validation from white just like everyone else.
I think you’re jealous because your people have to work super hard at doing boring stuff to get white people to tolerate you, while blacks can do the bare minimum and have white men falling at their feet. But don’t take my world for it, just look at how fondly the Greeks spoke of the black civilization they encountered in the Sudan. A civilization, which, again, was lacking in many of the cultural achievments that white people hold dear. Just the fact that it was wealthy and organized made the white boys wanna toot their butts in the air and get busy with their beloved Kangz. Nobody cares about what so-called people of color have to say but, for WHITE MEN, there’s definitely a thin line between perceiving blacks as sub-human vs super human.
For what it’s worth, a lot of black people are indeed ugly as shit. If you’ve spent any time around them you’d know that they make fun of peoples looks all the time. As for averages, well…you can look up average faces by country and judge for yourself who’s the least attractive race. It’s worth nothing, however, that there’s a difference between attractive and attracted to. For example, the picture below shows the difference between ugly and attractive within the black race, yet few non-black women would be attracted to either one. White men, on the other hand? Oh, they would devour that guy on the right if given a chance:
There was even a study where they compare composite faces of white Brits to those of Hadza hunter-gathers in Africa. The Hadza men were undoubtedly more attractive on average, however, if given a smart phone and a tinder account, they’d probably fare poorly with non-black women.
Most of us do not care or want validation from Blacks or Whites. We are happy the way we are. Some may want validation of Whites and some even from Blacks, as rap culture has been pushed around the world. This is interesting, in the UK I have found long resident (not FOBs but those born in UK with passports) Pakistani youths of two extreme types. Those who hate blacks and call blacks monkeys (literally), attack blacks in gangs and on the other hand, those whigger versions of Pakistanis, who are wannabe blacks. Actually a Caribbean British born Black girl told me straight, many of them look at these "whigger" Pakistani youths as "wannabe Blacks', exact words. And she laughed after that. Maybe many Indians and Bangladeshi would be the same too. We South Asians are all quite similar that way.
The other so-called “people of color” have their own reasons for hating on blacks, which is fine. Black people don’t care about that, they want validation from white just like everyone else.
This is the kind of attitude one gets when one treats Black people too well. Chest thumping and arrogance. This is a similar attitude one gets from lower class browns too, after all, we browns are diluted niggers. And thank god for the dilution of our "niggerness' by cold climate Caucasoid and Mongoloid genes, raised IQ and we could build civilizations or we would be dancing in the bush till 1800 AD.
I think you’re jealous because your people have to work super hard at doing boring stuff to get white people to tolerate you, while blacks can do the bare minimum and have white men falling at their feet.
Yeah, Blacks are super judgmental. Ruthlessly judgmental. Not all though. Some Middle class educated Africans were quite civilized and sweet but most black youth are very judgmental about others including other blacks.
If you’ve spent any time around them you’d know that they make fun of peoples looks all the time.
I do not know what to say. Your homoerotic fantasies about White dudes is very amusing.Replies: @John Johnson
White men, on the other hand? Oh, they would devour that guy on the right if given a chance:
If you wanna know Black guys who would be attractive to non Black non brainwashed women, considered handsome, so to speak and would be real sexual threat would be guys like Denzel Washington or Idris Elba. Yeah guys like that would pull women easy. But handsomeness (or beauty for women) is less common in Blacks than most other races and extremely less common as compared to Europeans and may be East Asians.BTW getting women (or White dong LOL) is not what a man should be admired for. but for achievements. Women are admired for the men they snag, not men. Getting women is easy if you understand female mind. We are made to find each other and mate by nature, that is easy. Those guys who suck with women, do so because they have a mistaken opinion of female nature again thanks to brainwashing by the media. It is as simple as that. if those guys could be guided, getting women is easy. Building and running civilizations is the difficult thing and can be considered achievements for men, not getting women (or dong).Replies: @Commentator Mike
The Hadza men
This analysis is spot on:
“THE MIND OF THE RACIST WHITE SUPREMACIST: RACIST WHITE HETEROSEXUAL (HOMOSEXUAL) MALE’S PORNOGRAPHIC DESIRE FOR THE BLACK MALE PENIS”
What? What are you smoking man? The elites suppress this knowledge of IQ differences. The elites promote interracial marriages. The elites are anti-White. The elites blame normal White people for colonialism. The elites suppress the knowledge of all the good deeds colonials did in their colonies.
the vibe these IQ obsessed elites give off.
If white nationalists are in favor of non interference in darky world why do they shoot up black churches instead of, say, bombing the pentagon, or the companies that profit from political instability in places like Africa? It seems that they should be more interested in taking on the military industrial complex than writing articles about black people, no? And why did Don Black, founder of the white nationalist form stormfront, travel to the Caribbean to try and overthrow a black government instead of just moving to an all white country like Denmark, where he’d never have to worry about seeing a black face ever again?
Truth is, white people – and white MEN in particular – have always had a strange sexual fixation with black men. Right or wrong, they perceive black men as being more attractive than themselves and get aroused by the thought of black men lusting after their women. While it might be unfounded, the obsession is so deep rooted that it causes a lot of white men to fantasize about sucking and riding black penises, thereby satisfying the more “dominant” men before they have a chance to ravage the precious women. This is why the whole IQ business is necessary … because if a number African countries become sufficiently wealthy, it means that white men loose their status as the most desirable race of men. Whether this is true or not is debatable, but that’s the white man’s perception. And perhaps, his greatest fear.
Even though Asians are a much bigger threat to white hegemony, nobody perceives them to be a sexual threat. This goes for red dots and rice farmers alike. They’re seen as a bunch of goofy geeks with no sex appeal, so who cares? In the coming decades, though, as Africans become wealthier, we’re going to see a lot more air traffic from western countries into cities like Nairobi and Cape Town, often for reasons of sex tourism. The amount of interracial gay sex is gonna sky rocket as scores of frantic white men pour into African cities in an effort to satisfy their “Kangz,” thus keeping them away from white women.
We know this because it happened in the ancient world too, when Greek scholars used to visit the fabled city of Meroe to perform fellatio on the Africans, one going so far as to describe them as the “tallest and handsomest of men.” The society they heaped such praise upon had neither the cultural achievements of Greece, nor the military might of Rome. It was just a run of the mill civilization that became pretty wealthy through iron working. So yeah … that tells us everything we need to know about white racialism doesn’t it? It turns out that black men don’t have to conquer foreign lands or excel at math to get white men to respect them. They need only to build wealthy societies and white men fall at their feet and kiss their butt. Will white men do the same for Asian men? Middle Eastern men? Probably not, but they feel it’s their natural place in the world to be cucked by black men, hence they obsess over black people being poor and downtrodden. They want a reason to shower black men with complements and, in return, have black men shower them with … hmm, something else. Just pay attention in the coming decades and you’ll see that a lot of white hatred towards blacks is nothing more than admiration in disguise. And it probably has to do with the stark difference in skin color and bone density between the races, not IQ.
Most White nationalists are more anti-Jewish than anti-black. Blacks are seen as nuisance but ZOG is the real enemy. But that varies from groups to groups. George Lincoln Rockwell though disliking blacks always Blaming YT for everything as well as Black crimes considered Blacks are fellow victims of ZOG like Whites. He believed Blacks could be given a few states as compensation and there could be friendly separation. But according to him both White and Black Americans were victims of ZOG.
It seems that they should be more interested in taking on the military industrial complex than writing articles about black people, no?
The whole Don Black incident was some weird and strange incident.
And why did Don Black, founder of the white nationalist form stormfront, travel to the Caribbean t
On average black people of both genders are way uglier than White people of both genders. Most non Black non Whites would agree to this. Yeah, few Blacks of both genders would be attractive, but on average blacks of both genders are way uglier than Whites of both genders. This "Black men being attractive than White men" idea is a weird shit which only exists in the West and primarily due to Jew media propaganda. Outside of the West, something like this would be laughable. Throughout the World it are Caucasoid features which are considered the most attractive and even Mongoloid too. Negroid is in general not considered attractive though few attractive Negroids do exist, though the percentage is smaller than other races among pure Negroids. Pure Austroloids are never considered attractive except some few fluke cases. It is Western media and Hollywood which pushes this idea of Negroid men being more attractive which is considered weird by most of the world. Bollywood has a little Brahmanical dominance and is connected to the Indian deep State and has some propaganda, but even then a lot of Muslims are powerful in Bollywood. But unlike Hollywood, no phenotype is pushed on the people. Bollywood tends to follow market forces in this, the desire of the masses and the market in India wants more Caucasoid looking Indians at times close to Europeans. Not pure Europeans especially Nords/ Northern Euros as as that would a super-dose of pure Caucasoid, but Caucasoid among the range of looks of South Asians so people can relate. Even the most darkest Australoid looking Indians relate to our Caucasoid looking stars as one of their own, Indian or desi. If black guys would have been more attractive, market forces would have gone in a different direction, but it does not with few exceptions. And this is true for all Brown semi-Caucasoid societies such as Latin America, Middle East, North Africa and South Asia. The preference is for the most Caucasoid looking men and women within the native range of looks. In South East Asia, the celebrities of both race are more Mongoloid on average. That is against the black component, the more the non black (either Negroid or Australoid) component , the more attractive the men are considered. Indian women in India mostly do not find Black men attractive but Indian women in the West do. Mostly due to the effects of Western Jew Media brainwashing.Replies: @Malla
Right or wrong, they perceive black men as being more attractive than themselves
This is weird too. I think East Asian men are pushed down and de-masculated by Jew Hollywood for some reason. In East Asia, Asian men do allright. The West is weird and anti-logos.
Even though Asians are a much bigger threat to white hegemony, nobody perceives them to be a sexual threat....... They’re seen as a bunch of goofy geeks with no sex appeal, so who cares?
LOL you think the dot heads at silicon valley are representative of all dot heads? LOL India and the subcontinent as a whole have a hairy chest (which most black guys do not have) machismo culture the type you see in Mediterranean Europe, North Africa, Middle East and parts of the Latin World. Yeah Indians in general can be quite beta but a strong machismo culture exists anyways. Machismo does not mean you are strongest or bravest. Nords are more physically stronger then these groups from Southern Europe to South Asia but Nords do not have this type of machismo culture. Blacks do not have this latin type machismo culture either, blacks have a more savage type behaviour.
This goes for red dots and rice farmers alike. They’re seen as a bunch of goofy geeks with no sex appeal, so who cares?
Most Blacks would happily go to Africa for a cool $200k. For the typical Black person in America life is tantamount to living in a developing country anyway, but with more jobs in services than agriculture and wider variety of entertainment. That’s the only real difference, but whites have convinced themselves that since THEY’RE living phat in America that the same must be true for Blacks.
In a couple of decades most Africans will enjoy a standard of living comparable to what American Blacks have, so a mass exodus is pretty much inevitable, as Blacks will have nothing to loose by leaving America aside from racism itself. Even though reparations could accelerate the process, whites don’t want it because they know that without Blacks some other group has to occupy the bottom caste in this country, possibly themselves. They also know that Blacks are the closest thing they’ve ever ever had to a moral compass, then there’s the fear of missing out on interracial porn, etc.
The only biological realism is that,
1. Blacks are smarter than whites, and
2. Blacks are more athletic than whites.
The second point is obvious. The first one is backed by data showing that Africans outperform whites academically in countries like America and the UK, despite facing more discrimination than any other race. Meanwhile, let somebody call a white person a cracker and they’re ready to commit suicide. Smh.
Black men rate white women as poorly as they rate black women:
https://www.gwern.net/docs/psychology/okcupid/raceandattraction20092014.html
A common refrain is that white women behave too “masculine”, an observation I can verify from personal experience. One of my former co-workers, an attractive blonde chick with big breasts and green eyes, turned me off after a violent meltdown over a missing stapler in the office. We stayed in touch over a period of time after I had quit, when she gave me multiple chances to hook up, however, I just couldn’t get over the way she acts. Combative, mouthy and arrogant = boner killer, especially when you come to expect that behavior from certain types of women. Coming from an Asian it might be kinda hot, since they typically don’t act like that.
Sadly, black men are undesirable themselves, so their actual attitudes towards women go largely unnoticed. The belief that black men have some insatiable desire for white women isn’t based in reality, it’s a bisexual fantasy that resides in the heads of white men.
Smh, whites are getting real bold. Had they known her last name they wouldn’t have done this, they’d have chosen a (black) victim who’d get no media attention like they usually do.
In the unlikely event that this was a hate crime you turkeys will do absolutely nothing about it, except scream at each other “see, see…blacks are even worse than us.” Everyone knows that’s not the case though.
Tell that one to the military. Those people are going to play the biggest role as to whether or not this country balkanizes, or what happens if and when it tries. So many things happen in California then travel East. Sooner or later those left coast Dims will have secession on the ballot and will eventually vote it in. What happens next is anyone's guess. But it's coming.SuluReplies: @Slimer
In truth white men are more disorganized than blacks, and full of estrogen to boot.
Blacks are disproportionately in the military, cuck. Remember Micah Johnson? What he did to those cops down in Texas? That’s the fate of all you estrogen-laden soy boys who think it’s edgy and cool to call for a race war.
You might get your balkanization in the end, but not without a lot of losses.
Then a few paragraphs later...
Blacks are decent enough people, likable if they don’t hate you, and phenomenally talented.
I find these two statements at odds with each other. As for the first, I can find little that blacks have contributed to the world save for music. That is hardly enough to make up for their constant lawlessness. For every Cab Calloway they produce they have 50,000 pieces of shit to act as a counter balance.
Black ghetto culture and white are immiscible in so many fundamental values that they will not live well together.
This talk of balkanization is a fantasy of not having to go to work and live out your painfully boring lives. In truth white men are more disorganized than blacks, and full of estrogen to boot.
Tell that one to the military. Those people are going to play the biggest role as to whether or not this country balkanizes, or what happens if and when it tries. So many things happen in California then travel East. Sooner or later those left coast Dims will have secession on the ballot and will eventually vote it in. What happens next is anyone's guess. But it's coming.SuluReplies: @Slimer
In truth white men are more disorganized than blacks, and full of estrogen to boot.
Some cultures can assimilate, for example East Asian and American white, Latino and American white. But, in addition to sharply different cultures, too many blacks live in sprawling, racially isolated urban centers with almost no contact with the outside world other than television.
East Asians and Latinos are not assimilating into American whiteness, but forming a sort of buffer zone between blacks and whites due to unfettered immigration. That they’re better liked than blacks has less to do with their culture than their physical proximity to whiteness.The links below show that Africans are one of the most successful populations in the country, in terms of education and income. Yet, it’s fair to say that most white families would rather their child marry a Latino than an African. Ditto for Asian families.
https://research.newamericaneconomy.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2018/01/NAE_African_V6.pdf
https://www.courthousenews.com/african-immigrants-doing-well-in-united-states/
The idea that culture is what matters also defies the fact that American blacks are utterly in love with southern U.S. culture, and always have been. However, southern whites forbid their children from marrying blacks, not foreigners.
Regarding the larger point of this article I’ll say the following: Those who proclaim America to be finished are simply fantasizing about not having to work, or subtly justifying their apathy towards civic engagement. In the long run America won’t even have much of a black population, as most will have moved to Africa by the end of the century (look up FDI inflows into the continent if you think it’s a permanent backwater). The ones who stay will have a lot of white ancestry and won’t pose much of a threat as far as rioting, etc.
Maybe it does for you.
I don’t understand why almost every modern African state is a disaster. Maybe corruption explains it best
Nope. You should look up Chanda Chisala’s article showing that Africans from English speaking countries outperform whites in UK schools. You might also want to consult with John Fuerst, the well known white nationalist who posts under the handle Chuck, regarding test scores that show African immigrants to America have a cognitive ability comparable to Eastern Europeans. The assertion that blacks are “lazy n stupid” only continues to resonate with those who are themselves lazy and stupid, as more intelligent race realists seem to have dispensed with that line of thinking quite some time ago.
Whether or not Africans can build a modern, prosperous society remains to be seen, although it’s projected that by 2050 most countries in Sub-Saharan Africa will have transitioned from low to middle-income, giving them a standard of living comparable to Turkey or Mexico. While conditions won’t be perfect, this newfound prosperity will draw back the majority of blacks from America and the most talented ones from Europe, with birth rates slowing down as more women enter the work force.
It’s mammoth population positions the continent to wield a considerable amount of power and influence in the future, even just by encroaching on the domain of the “second world.” Whenever whites hear this, they poop their pants and curse the heavens in fear that blacks will use their power to breed whites out of existence. But I argue that that fear is unfounded, as the data from OkCupid shows that non-blacks universally find African features unattractive. Asian men have lots of money, afterall, but remain undesirable to all but Asian women. And Jews? Money and status might buy them assimilation into American whiteness, but people in Europe will forever be turned off by their big noses and beady eyes. So what is there to fear with blacks? It doesn’t make sense to keep forcing this notion that blacks are intellectually inferior when it has no bearing on white people’s status in the world. Whites will always be on top in a sense, simply because people find their features most attractive.
Do your research goofy. China’s not the only place investing in and trading with Africa.
Some VC firms are more active than others, but Japanese company Kepple Africa Ventures is setting all kinds of records having so far invested in more than 50 African tech startups – with 20 of those deals done in 2020 alone.
The UK’s development finance institution and impact investor, CDC Group, has signed a partnership agreement with Rwanda Finance to support the development of a new international financial capital for Africa.
Ghanaian startup mPharma, which manages prescription drug inventory for pharmacies and their suppliers, has raised $17 million in its latest funding round and announced the appointment to its board of Helena Foulkes, former president of CVS, the largest pharmacy retail chain in the United States.
The Accra-based company, founded by chief executive Greg Rockson seven years ago, has received the funding from CDC Group, the UK’s development finance arm, alongside several of its previous investors including Dr. Daniel Vasella, ex-chief executive of Novartis, Silicon Valley investor Jim Breyer and Dompe Holdings, the family office of the Italian pharmaceutical giant.
https://qz.com/africa/1860227/ghanas-mpharma-raises-17m-appoints-ex-cvs-boss-to-board/
Senegal partners with UK lab to develop a hand-held coronavirus test kit
https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/12/africa/senegal-uk-coronavirus-rapid-test-kit/index.html
Africa’s international trade is largely seen through the U.S.-China prism, a binary choice between one economic partner or the other. But as the West steps back from its strategic relationships in the continent, and as African countries grow weary of the debt potential of China’s controversial Belt and Road Initiative, several countries in central and southern Africa are finding a new partner in the unlikeliest of places: Belarus.
https://intpolicydigest.org/2020/05/23/in-africa-belarus-steps-up-while-west-retreats/
Blacks can’t do STEM lol
Minister Gatete observed that there are already 50 Rwandans who are pursuing masters and first degrees in nuclear science and technology in Russia, adding that Rwanda plans to have more students in that filed.
“We are planning to send 20 more students [to Russia]. But, we also need others to go to study to America, Europe, Asia so that we have a team of a variety of skills,” he observed.”
https://www.newtimes.co.rw/news/use-nuclear-technology-gets-green-light-rwanda
Projected by whom? Marvel Comics? What little wealth Africa has comes from resource extraction - oil and gold and diamonds, etc. The Chinese would love to use the future billions of Sub-saharans as a source of cheap industrial labor but they are unreliable as workers under non-slavery conditions (although maybe this doesn't really represent an obstacle to the Chinese?) and regimes are too corrupt to provide reliable infrastructure - the electric grid is down more often than it is up (and when it is up, most people steal the power rather than pay for it so the utilities are underfunded). The Chinese can build factories but what good is the factory if there is no electricity, no road or rail network to bring material in and out, if everything gets stolen? Their only use for the internet seems to be running fraud schemes.Replies: @Slimer
It’s projected that by mid-century most of Sub-Saharan Africa, not all of it, will have a living standard comparable to Mexico or Chile
Lmao. Looks like my comment struck a nerve or two. Or eight.
It’s funny how white folks claim to want separation from blacks when it’s obvious that you all are deeply disturbed by the mere thought of not having them around, like the abusive husband who tells his battered wife that she’ll never make it without him. It’s all part of a sick, twisted belief system inherited from a centuries long legacy of brutalizing and dehumanizing black people for the sole purpose of lifting up whites. Nothing lasts forever though, as much as it pains you to hear it.
China’s economic ties with Africa are played up by the U.S. and Chinese governments for political reasons, thus causing some gullible idiots to propagate a narrative of “neo colonialism.” No doubt this is largely just white people projecting their feelings onto other races, as they figure that if whites hate blacks enough to enslave them, then surely the Chinese must feel the same way. In reality, both countries invest about equally into Africa, the main difference being that America invests mostly in extractive industries like oil & gas and mining, while China invests across the board. Everything from banking to agriculture to logistics. That’s why you don’t see Asians or any other race except whites building websites devoted to making fun of black people. The whole black obsession is really a white thing and you need to own it.
Africa’s future lies in industries like commercial farming, agro processing, horticulture and software development, not light manufacturing, although that too will play a (small) role. Sorry, but that’s the consensus in most business and academic circles.
The rating agency Standard and Poor’s lists markets with the most favourable investment climate. The section Frontier Emerging Markets (37 countries in total) includes 8 SSA countries, namely Botswana, Ivory Coast, Ghana, Kenya, Mauritius, Namibia, Nigeria and Zimbabwe.
Some experts expect the average GDP growth rate in SSA to level off at 5-7% in the coming decade (from 2020 onwards). Western think tanks (EY, RAND, FUTURES, just to name a few) forecast that if the current economic and demographic macro-trends remain in place by 2050, the African economy will stand every chance of soaring from $2 trillion to $29 trillion to overtake the U.S. and Europe combined.
Dmitriev, R.V. African Studies in Russia: Works of the Institute for African Studies of the Russian Academy of Science, page 7.
And don’t bother to reply to me because I’m not going to read it. In the spirit of the times I’m working with some friends on getting this silly site shut down.
Personally I hope we can find a way to help blacks succeed and participate in society because they aren’t going anywhere and we have to learn to live with them.
With most African countries transitioning from low to middle income, this is probably not the case. It’s projected that by mid-century most of Sub-Saharan Africa, not all of it, will have a living standard comparable to Mexico or Chile. While not as cozy as the west, the *net* benefit of living in such a society will pull in millions from the diaspora, including the U.S.
America’s black population will rise for the next couple of decades, due to immigration from the continent, then steadily decline thereafter. Those who stay will have a lot of white ancestry, like their distant cousins in Canada who identify as African Nova Scotian. So what remains will be a small, blackish collective with roots in southern U.S. culture that occasionally complains of police brutality but doesn’t pose any threat of tearing up your cities.
LOL!! So sub-Saharan Africa will have a living standard above Columbia and Argentina. That's a good one.Sub-Saharan Africa is going to continue to struggle to have a living standard that approaches those of the West Bank, Afghanistan, etc. American Blacks only avoid falling into mass civilizational breakdown due to Jewish / White largess. And they live in the wealthiest nation on the planet. And yet Blacks are supposed to be able to surpass the civilization of Italians in Argentina? Or even of Arabs in any non-war torn Arab nation? Again, that's a good one.Mexico doesn't even "pull in Millions from the Diaspora". Africans will continue to want to come here in as many slave ships as they can pack, given the opportunity. Proximity to Whites is paramount above all else. That's for every other race, including those who delude themselves otherwise via supremacist pseudo-Judaism (Islam, especially Arab Muslims) and stolen history (Persians). That's not debatable at this point in history."Most" African countries are "transitioning" from low to middle income? Where do you get this stuff?
t’s projected that by mid-century most of Sub-Saharan Africa, not all of it, will have a living standard comparable to Mexico or Chile.
So, what will remain is the same problem we have now except ever larger. What you predict is ridiculous on its face.The high birth rates of the"blackish" (ie: Black, right?) population, and of every minority population with incomes below Whites, contradicts that prediction even given your laughable premise of mass repatriation to Africa.
So what remains will be a small, blackish collective with roots in southern U.S. culture that occasionally complains of police brutality but doesn’t pose any threat of tearing up your cities.
It remains to be seen, but even if true, such a development tends to increase, not decrease, emigration as it increases the number of aspiring middle class population with the requisite skills to navigate the bureaucracy of Western countries.
With most African countries transitioning from low to middle income
Projected by whom? Marvel Comics? What little wealth Africa has comes from resource extraction - oil and gold and diamonds, etc. The Chinese would love to use the future billions of Sub-saharans as a source of cheap industrial labor but they are unreliable as workers under non-slavery conditions (although maybe this doesn't really represent an obstacle to the Chinese?) and regimes are too corrupt to provide reliable infrastructure - the electric grid is down more often than it is up (and when it is up, most people steal the power rather than pay for it so the utilities are underfunded). The Chinese can build factories but what good is the factory if there is no electricity, no road or rail network to bring material in and out, if everything gets stolen? Their only use for the internet seems to be running fraud schemes.Replies: @Slimer
It’s projected that by mid-century most of Sub-Saharan Africa, not all of it, will have a living standard comparable to Mexico or Chile
The only thing blacks adopted from Southern culture was Christianity between 1750-1800. Since 1950 the cultural imperialism has been in the opposite direction, so don't associate black dysfunction with Southern social norms.
with roots in southern U.S. culture
Teenage shooters in the hood almost always get killed, if not imprisoned. They committ murder knowing before hand that they’ll have to pay the piper some day, with no option to resume a normal life. Instead, they’re consigned to a state of fear that entails looking over their shoulder until the get back finally comes.
The only people who are legitimately scared of black criminals are black, not white people who believe they should be able to kill blacks with no consequence.
I maintain that hostility towards blacks is mostly based on looks, in that people are typically grossed out by nappy hair and african features. It’s like how women say they dislike men for behaving in such and such manner, but then happily sleep with good looking men who behave the same way.
You're projecting, Slimer. You are grossed out by black men and you want to be a woman who sleeps with good looking white men. You are free to transition.
I maintain that hostility towards blacks is mostly based on looks, in that people are typically grossed out by nappy hair and african features. It’s like how women say they dislike men for behaving in such and such manner, but then happily sleep with good looking men who behave the same way.
I dunno, Memphis and New Orleans have crime rates that rival just about any ghettoized city in the North. If there’s any truth to what you’re saying, it’s likely because blacks who left the South would have been naturally less submissive and docile than those who stayed behind.
It’s pretty sensible to capitalize black if Black means African American, i.e., a descendant of American slavery. While technically a mixture of various African tribes, with a little bit of English and Scottish mixed in, Black or African American is firstly an ethno-political identity formed in the United States, unlike the much broader white American label that encompasses peoples who identify strongly with the regions of Europe from whence their ancestors came. This is why you’ll hear whites say things like, “I’m one quarter Irish, one quarter polish and one half German” but you won’t hear Blacks say, “I’m one quarter Igbo, one quarter Ashanti and one half…” whatever.
One needn’t worry that society is heading towards a new credo of Blacks rule, whites drool. Rest easy in the knowing that the opposite will always be true, since non-black people off all stripes have more in common physically with whites/Europeans than they do with black Africans. Unlike anti-semitism, which is mostly confined to Europe and the Middle East, anti-blackness pervades the world at large, but for one tiny blip on the on the map. Moreover, it’s a great source of pride in most parts of the world. You’ll see people from all corners gleefully recount stories of their parents or grandparents cursing those wretched blacks.
Other forms of racism exist, but are not nearly as common. Nor as dehumanizing. Those who insist otherwise are soft, to put it bluntly, and would easily fold under the hostility that blacks regularly face. To quote one writer:
Anti-blackness covers the fact that society’s hatred of blackness, and also its gratuitous violence against black people, is complicated by its need for our existence. For example, for white people — again, better described as those who have been racialized white — the abject inhumanity of the black reinforces their whiteness, their humanness, their power, and their privilege, whether they’re aware of it or not. Black people are at once despised and also a useful counterpoint for others to measure their humanness against. In other words, while one may experience numerous compounding disadvantages, at least they’re not black.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/04/opinion/george-floyd-anti-blackness.html
Much like the difference between:Big C Conservative (believes in capital punishment) vs small c conservative (believes in "first do no harm")Big D Democrat (advocate of tyrannical communism) vs small d democrat (advocate of "one man one vote")Big L Liberal (advocate of tyrannical communism) vs small l liberal (believes non-elites have natural rights)I much prefer the small letter concepts.Replies: @Steve Sailer
It’s pretty sensible to capitalize black if Black means African American, i.e., a descendant of American slavery.
Only secular Ashkenazic Jews living in the USA have high IQs, and they will not exist by 2060 owing to their low female fertility and extreme misegenation rate with East Asian, Black and Hispanic females (who have completely different IQ profiles).
The Orthodox Jews, Sephardic Jews and the Jews in the Levant have truly sub-human IQs of 92 and below. They never went through the selection process that central and eastern European Jews (now mostly living in the USA) went through, leading to the impressive verbal IQ increase. The Jewish IQ meme will be over by this century, as the half-Asian Jewish hybrids get absorbed by gentile white America, leaving behind only an utterly retarded race of inbred welfare recipients in Brooklyn and Israel to carry on the Jewish identity.
You know what’d be a good movie? Derb’s daughter brings home a ragamuffin black kid off the street for dinner one night, whom she sees sleeping on a park bench because his Engineering scholarship doesn’t cover room and board. At first encounter the Derb is peeved that she’d even think of bringing such FILTH to his doorstep, much less letting him in the house. He paces the floor in the manner of a dispirited cuckold, wondering where it all went wrong, before mumbling obscenities under his breath until his cheeks swell with rage. He lunges forward in a fit, tossing his heavily marked copy of Serre’s Arithmetic faintly passed the boy’s head, calming only after being physically restrained by his wife and son.
His daughter breaks down in tears, pleading at once for her father to stop the antics. But her cries are motivated in part by her not really wanting to be with the kid, he’s just a placeholder until she musters up the courage to ask out the square jawed Chad who frequents the coffee shop by her job. When she breaks it off, Derb feels sorry and decides to take the kid under his wing. He makes it HIS responsibility to be the father that the poor chap never had, teaching him REAL math along the way and not that plug n chug crap they like to teach the engineers. The kid drops out of college, moving into Derb’s attic where he devotes his whole life to solving a famous math problem. Near the end he finds a solution, culminating in a scene where he’s awarded the Field’s metal, making history as the first black to ever do it. Derb’s in attendance, of course, with tears of joy on full display like Jesse Jackson the night Obama won the 2008 election.
Somewhere in between, Derb does his own little bit of research. Not on math, but on his family tree, coming to find out that he’s got “one in the woodpile,” as they used to say in the South. And don’t laugh and say, “Oh ho ho, let’s call it Hidden N*****s”. It’s really less a comedy than a drama.
If you could just keep your hands off children you’d be the bestest race ever!
You’ve been hitting us with zingers upon zingers for the past week or so. I just wanted to take time out to acknowledge you, as no one else seems to have done it.
Botswana was never ruled by whites. It was a protectorate of the British, not a colony. Hence, it was always ruled by indigenous black Africans, whose relative success in governing the country runs counter to the assertion that blacks were better off under colonial rule.
In any case, every dog has its day. Africa’s economy is projected to be larger than Europe’s by mid-century and better yet, 1/5 of Europe’s population by then will be African. A whopping 20%, so no shortage of BBC for you to enjoy with your wife.
Understand that whatever hostility blacks may exhibit towards whites is not about colonialism, slavery, segregation or even the genocides committed by whites throughout Africa, it’s your never ending obsession with race and the way you try to hide your insecurities by constantly comparing yourselves to blacks. Not to mention your tendency to violently shout down anyone who exposes the lies you tell about history.
No matter what you think of the man, you’ve gotta hand it to Ron Unz for generating content that excites a bunch of 50 year old edgelords who’ve been made unsettled by this belief that only THEY know the truth about blacks… n stuff. Poor fools don’t realize that everyone knows blacks commit a disproportionate share of violent crime. Most people just don’t care, because it doesn’t effect them. It doesn’t effect UNZ readers either, for the most part. They just use it as justification for their hatred of black skin.
Oh there are plenty in existence, including Mr. Taylor and over 80% of the commenters here at UNZ. The framing of white racism as some brand of separatist nationalism is a sham, and disregards you all’s deep-seated fixation with comparing yourselves to black people. Without blacks, your lives are meaningless.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t Taylor the guy who collected millions in donations from his loyal band of followers, but, instead of using the funds to repatriate them to one of the many all white nations in Europe, decided to go to some Caribbean country to try and overthrow the government? His unsuccessful attempt at destabilizing a black country tells us all we need to know about the aims of white “nationalism.”
Many of you are still seething over the fact that Africa didn’t just roll over and die, as a deferential bystander to its own plundering and rape by white “nationalists.” It hurts your heart to know that your “separatist” regimes got ran out of lands that don’t belong to them.
Again, there is a difference between white nationalism, white separatism, and white supremacism. It's not my fault you're incapable of understanding these terms. White nationalism is just ethnonationalism for white ethnic groups. Blacks are just one non-white group that white nationalists think do not belong in the U.S., a country founded for and by whites. Separation is in all of our interests. That being said, Jared Taylor isn't even a white nationalist, I don't think. He is more in favor of absolute freedom of association within the U.S. So if whites wanted to form their own communities and exclude non-whites, that should be allowed.
The framing of white racism as some brand of separatist nationalism is a sham, and disregards you all’s deep-seated fixation with comparing yourselves to black people. Without blacks, your lives are meaningless.
You're wrong. That never happened.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t Taylor the guy who collected millions in donations from his loyal band of followers, but, instead of using the funds to repatriate them to one of the many all white nations in Europe, decided to go to some Caribbean country to try and overthrow the government? His unsuccessful attempt at destabilizing a black country tells us all we need to know about the aims of white “nationalism.”
Only because it’s illegal for them to upload their child porn
LOL! White fantasies of browns and yellows swooping in and save them are always good for a laugh.
What you’re describing would require cutting off immigration so that Asians and Hispanics have time to assimilate. Since that’s not going to happen anytime soon, those groups will continue to occupy a sort of buffer zone where they put their heads down, focus on work and avoid dealing in politics. They’ll side with white people by default, but change direction the moment a white person makes fun of their food, or refuses to go on a date with them. Then it’s POC unity, etc. This is especially true for Asians, who regard blacks as boring and see whites as more worthy competitors.
Hispanics are more rah rah about sticking it to blacks, but the reach of that hostility extends little further than occasional gang wars and catty comments on twitter about black women’s looks. On the political front, Hispanics have no interest in challenging blacks.
White culture
Racists have been fantasizing about this for decades, yet it never seems to happen. In fact, most Hispanics and Asians support reparations and affirmative action (look it up if you don’t believe).
Browns and yellows don’t want to be foot soldiers in the white man’s race war, despite being told “hey, you’re not like THEM, and since we can’t get em maybe y’all can get em for us.” They might harbor animosity towards blacks, but they also understand that many historical wrongs have yet to be righted in America.
So do a lot of White people. Person of any race can be misguided.
most Hispanics and Asians support reparations and affirmative action (look it up if you don’t believe).
Whites, Yellows, Reds, Browns and Blacks, all those varieties of humans, many of us are unwitting foot soldiers and cannon fodder for the Zio elites for the coming Satanic NWO Raj. It is just that since Whites are the first to be targeted for elimination (being the biggest threat) White Nationalists types have figured out and oppose this NWO movement. Yellows are next (for elimination) if you ask me, especially the Japanese. But these eliminations will not bring no Utopia for us brown blacks.
Browns and yellows don’t want to be foot soldiers in the white man’s race war
They will never be righted till we have Jew Raj Communism in America. Those "historical wrongs" have nothing to do with the state of black people, now or in the future. They are tools used by the elites and once they get what they want, those 'historical wrongs" will go down the memory hole.
understand that many historical wrongs have yet to be righted in America.
You really think poorly of your readers, Steve. Anyone can tell that that kid’s a gang member, seeing as how he’s throwing up signs on camera.
The problems would arise, of course, when underclass black s from some nearby ghetto came in to steal our stuff and rape our women. We’d end up shooting a couple, and then we’d quickly be where Officer Chauvin and his colleagues are now, where the three guys in Brunswick, Georgia are, looking at four hundred years porridge on federal “civil rights” and “hate crime” charges.
Hey, this kind of snarky, hyperbolous prose is only suitable for a readership with an IQ above 70.
I’ll repost my comment from a previous thread, for those wondering why people generally don’t complain about black crime:
Hoping that white people will get riled up over black crime is low IQ, when so few of them will ever fall victim to it. In a given year black murderers account for < 1% of white deaths in America. In 2015, for example, blacks killed 500 whites out of a population of 243,000,000, a figure that includes not only hate crimes but drug dealings, domestic violence and the like.
https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-09-29/race-and-homicide-in-america-by-the-numbers
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_States#Race
Moreover, if hatred of blacks is really about crime, then how come white nationalists shoot up churches instead of, say, dope houses or street corners where known gang members congregate? Hmmm.
“…taking place in hundreds of US cities”
Eh, were taking place. In thirty US cities. We’ve definitely seen darker days.
@ Yojimbo/Zatoichi
Hoping that white people will get riled up over black crime is low IQ, when so few of them will ever fall victim to it. In a given year black murderers account for < 1% of white deaths in America. In 2015, for example, blacks killed 500 whites out of a population of 243,000,000, a figure that includes not only hate crimes but drug dealings, domestic violence and the like.
https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-09-29/race-and-homicide-in-america-by-the-numbers
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_States#Race
Black outrage persists only because a large percentage of blacks feel the effects of systematic racism. It's not hard to understand, although you’re free to pretend otherwise.
Non-black women find black men ugly. Only black women are into hooking up with black men, and it’s usually black men with really attractive faces.
A minority of the people crowding public spaces in America, and now parts of Europe, are protesting police brutality. Most would otherwise be apathetic and apolitical, but want to take their mind off the coronavirus for a few days. Sadly, we’re all going to pay for it later.
Yuk at that guy at the end. There’s nothing more cringe worthy than black folks vying for respectability when the biggest victims of racism have always been those who are least prone to doing wrong. Whites have always hated “good” blacks more than criminals, they just like to pretend that the former is some kind of extreme outlier rather than the norm.
That’s a shame, without this on his record he might have made it onto LAPD. He seems the the kind of over eager type they’re going to soon need.
“He is into Cosplay”
You can’t fault her for her choice in clothing.
Yeah, that's some solid tactical gear there. Maybe could have added some heels for increased comfort and mobility.
You can’t fault her for her choice in clothing.
It is, and the controversy actually stems from gay Asian men complaining that white men don’t want to date them.
Link to the video?
In the UK there’s a common belief that American cops are extremely tough and “no nonsense”, yet the footage I’ve seen lately of one negro beating multiple cops to a pulp at the same time, etc, makes me seriously question that.
It seems the only thing that makes an American cop “tough” is his gun, politically deprive him of his ability to defend himself with it and he is no tougher than an unarmed “British bobbie”. In fact maybe less tough as I think unarmed British police are more proficient at operating unarmed as it’s all they’ve ever known.
#245, you may be right:
“I think unarmed British police are more proficient at operating unarmed as it’s all they’ve ever known.”
They are. This current situation is a most unusual aberration.
In the UK there’s a common belief that American cops are extremely tough and “no nonsense”
There’s a 60 minutes episode where the reporter spends the greater part of an hour oohing and ahhing over a gang of professional thieves from Serbia or some such county. Then there’s white promotion of mafia culture, along with their deification of pedophiles and mass shooters. It’s fair to say that Europeans have quite an appreciation for their own criminality.
The idea that blacks could be ethnically cleansed, and without massive outcry to be specific, is not some funny dream you had, it’s wishful thinking. In reality, when Hispanics start moving into black neighborhoods, blacks start moving into white neighborhoods.
Life might be a little less comfortable if the top 10% of whites disappeared, but blacks would hardly starve to death. The bottom 90% of you are essentially here to take up space and be a drag on human progress.
White violence is what started this mess in the first place.
The Chinese are literally paying off western news outlets to not run negative stories about their people, surpassing the west in research and development, and even recruiting girls from Eastern Europe to work as escorts and models for their elites, and all you idiots can do is sit around obsessing about blacks.
We know that Jews are the eternal boogeyman, but you can see white influence being upended right before your eyes in this case. Right here, right now, no ifs or buts about it.
It just goes to show that whites are unconcerned with lost hegemony, or even being subordinate to other races. Their top priority is picking on blacks.
The jews have been upending white influence for a very long time. I don't know of any Chinese people who pushed for mass non white immigration, demonized white people, worshiping blacks, push anti white propaganda in the mass media/entertainment - I do however know about a lot of jews who did do these things.
but you can see white influence being upended right before your eyes in this case.
Course not. Das our utopian ethno state!!! They’d never do such a thing!!! They’re on hour siide…right?!? They white like us!!!
K, fine. It’s unlikely that Russia’s behind these riots. And aside from Antifa and BLM, it’s mostly a bunch of fidgety young people acting without a cause. Some of them want free stuff, while others are releasing angst accumulated over the months of being cooped up indoors. However, Russia will definitely use this tension to influence the election, as they did the last time around.
The idea that blacks are a beaten-down underclass is just so ridiculous, these people have high caste status - much higher than whites - and this has been the case for the last 60 years. They are officially discriminated for over whites in all areas of life by the US establishment, in terms of race. You are just talking absolute garbage.Replies: @Peter Akuleyev
So yes, how dare US blacks behave so badly. Why can’t they behave as well as the beaten-down underclass in the rest of the world when they have no jobs and no hope?
You are literally delusional. I am a white male and no black man has ever challenged me for anything, many black men have worked for me. If black men are taking your jobs or women it is because you are a loser. Face it, blacks enjoy no real status at all. They are entertainers and minstrels. As a group they have almost no capital, they have very little political power, and every black woman is painfully aware that almost all of us, white, black, Asian, or indigenous, find most black women pretty unattractive.
Yes, we throw blacks some perks to try to keep them quiet. But fact is we started wide scale immigration at the same time the Civil Rights movement started. The goal of immigration was to dilute black political power and provide business owners with trainable obedient employees. To that extent immigration has worked like a charm. Problem is it has left us with a large underclass of uneducated angry men and women who are smart enough to realize they have no real role to play in our society, but aren’t smart enough to design an alternative. This problem is going to get worse as offshoring and automation sends more and more white people to join them, and soon they will be battling for scraps.
As a race in our understanding of race in our society ('black', 'white', 'Asian', etc), the black race *obviously* enjoys higher status than the white gentile race. In terms of any single black individual's ability to advocate for his/her race, any single black obviously enjoy far greater ability to do that any single white gentile has.
You are literally delusional. I am a white male and no black man has ever challenged me for anything, many black men have worked for me. If black men are taking your jobs or women it is because you are a loser. Face it, blacks enjoy no real status at all. They are entertainers and minstrels. As a group they have almost no capital, they have very little political power, and every black woman is painfully aware that almost all of us, white, black, Asian, or indigenous, find most black women pretty unattractive.
Yes, we throw blacks some perks to try to keep them quiet. But fact is we started wide scale immigration at the same time the Civil Rights movement started. The goal of immigration was to dilute black political power and provide business owners with trainable obedient employees. To that extent immigration has worked like a charm. Problem is it has left us with a large underclass of uneducated angry men and women who are smart enough to realize they have no real role to play in our society, but aren’t smart enough to design an alternative. This problem is going to get worse as offshoring and automation sends more and more white people to join them, and soon they will be battling for scraps.
But people find black thuggery liberating, if only vicariously.
Get over your love of blacks you white Americans! They are Africans. The most criminal race in history. They have already destroyed so many white built cities and schools in America.
Now, this kind of ‘liberation’ is okay as fantasy, but there is the urge to push it all the way. And blacks, of course, are kings at pushing the craziness furthest. Break all the rules, give middle finger to the Man, act wild and crazy, and lead a slave rebellion and kill massuh and rape the missus and daughter. Norman Mailer wrote about this White Negro phenomenon. And white girls now got jungle fever and see interracism as ‘liberation’ from dorky white boys who presumably can no longer satisfy their women.
Okay, that’s enough. You’ve had your daily orgasm now it’s time to clean yourself up and logoff.
America is hell. And Western Europe is hot on its heels. I thank my lucky stars every day that I’m an Eastern European.
Ewww, you guys are obsessed with blacks.
The belief that blacks are incapable of inflicting the kind of cruel, systematic violence that whites are known for, and take such pride in, presupposes that they’re generally interested in exacting pain on others, rather than, say, maintaining a monopoly on victimhood, e.g., by behaving in ways that position them to claim a moral high ground. Look at Mauritania, for example, a country ruled largely by a racist regime of Arabs, whose repeated attempts at expelling the black majority have mostly been met with non-violence and an attitude of reconciliation. The blacks in that country could easily kill the Arabs, considering that latter group is not particularly good in combat, as we’ve seen with the Toyota war, and the video of the black police officer in Saudi Arabia wasting three machine gun wielding Arabs with nothing more than a pistol.
Point is, black Mauritanians are interested in more than “getting even,” not unlike blacks in aparthied South Africa. The governments of Kenya and Zimbabwe once made it a priority to protect the white minorities in their countries from anti-colonial forces. Had the governments lost control, you can rest assured it would’ve lead to civil war before any semblance of a white genocide. That’s because having a moral leg to stand on is really that important to blacks, hard as it is for white folks to understand.
So yeah, if y’all want to keep bragging about we wuz organized n sheeeit don’t sit around wondering why it’s okay to bash whites but not okay to bash blacks. Learn to take the high road sometimes.
Moving on to the author’s boring essay, two things are worth addressing:
First is the assertion that the great schism between black and non-black is civilizational, when all evidence points to it being physical. Just look at the uproar over the data showing that many black African populations outperform whites in school, or the data showing that in the next few decades most African countries will have transitioned from 3rd to 2nd world status, thus giving the continent a big role in world affairs. The mere thought of this stirs up hostile emotions within non-black people, who by and large see blacks as physically unattractive and hence, less deserving of success. What is there to gain by pretending that Asians, Jews or Native Americans encounter the same degree of hostility that blacks do?
Second, the author is wrong in dismissing intelligent design as a credible alternative to darwinism. Actually the evidence is pretty convincing.
That’s why to white, latino and Asian men….when their women go black they “can’t go back”…..
Lmao. Generally, non-white men know that they have low SMV and thus can’t be too picky. Few Asians or Latinos would reject Sofia Vergara because she’s dated black men. White men, on the other hand, would call her a fat bitch and a coal burner.
Granted all non-black people hate blacks, white men are the only ones who constantly compare themselves to black men.
I know what you’re insinuating, Germ…and no, aliens are not involved in all this, but Russians are.
White countries are not all part of some united front with a common agenda. They sometimes have legit beefs with each other.
I strongly believe in judging people by the content of their character, and not by race or ethnicity.
Most people don’t. Hence, if someone semi-respectable fights back, his stance will be used as justification for inflicting violence on blacks indiscriminately. Not just a few retaliatory crimes here and there, but a barrage of riots, bombings and shootings on a scale America hasn’t seen since the pre-civil rights era. People in high places would enjoy this as much as the next person, but they understand it makes the country susceptible to foreign interference. If the links below don’t convince you that it’s dangerous to keep pushing for a big pay back, then sadly, nothing will:
The History of Russian Involvement in America’s Race Wars
From propaganda posters to Facebook ads, 80-plus years of Russian meddling.
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/10/russia-facebook-race/542796/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/And_you_are_lynching_Negroes
https://megaphone.southwestern.edu/2018/10/20/history-the-cold-war-and-desegregation/
Regardless, everything boils down to geopolitics.
What's this? The Atlantic is admitting Sen McCarthy was right?
The History of Russian Involvement in America’s Race Wars
From propaganda posters to Facebook ads, 80-plus years of Russian meddling.
All is proceeding according to plan. It is in the rest of the world’s interest to knock the most talented group out of the competition.Replies: @Anonymous, @Slimer, @Tor597, @dfordoom
According to the government document, births to white women were down over 2% from 1,956,413 in 2018 to 1,914,141 in 2019.
The typical white guy spends his day doing busy work at a cushy office job, firing off a few emails in between social media rantings about affirmative action. You all go around beating your chest and screaming that you’re proud to be white, when only about 10% of whites are doing things that bring value to the world. The talented 10th as y’all like to say lol.
If you want white women to bear more children, maybe stop telling them they’re fat and intellectually inferior. That probably grosses them out.
That's fine (probably a magnitude higher than other races), Pareto distribution and all that. What is being lost here is the support group and encouragement to the ten percent that matter.
...when only about 10% of whites are doing things that bring value to the world
There must be soooo many disappointed Tiger Mums… I bet they secretly wish their kids were half-black, to get Yale and Harvard Wokemon points.
Hmmm, next time I hear “no rike a brack” I’ll mention these Wokemon points.
Doubt it’ll work though. People want to attend Harvard and Yale because they’re the pinnacle of white prestige, and having too many black or even half-black faces on campus would taint their reputation. This would be true even if blacks were stellar students.There’s an article somewhere about foolish Africans being lured into Chinese universities with promises of academic scholarships, only to see them given instead to lower performing white students. So Asians by and large are probably unbothered by universities scrapping the SAT requirement, as they want the best schools to remain somewhat white.
Women in matriarchal societies can’t pop out babies left and right since they have to work. Currently they’re only 1/3 of Africa’s labor force, hence the birth rate is so high. African Americans are somewhat matriarchal as reflected in birthrates, which are only high among long term welfare recipients not the general poulation.