Take Anatoly Chubais as an example. He was one of the most prominent Liberal western agents.

Chubais is a Jew. Putin is half-jew just like Lenin was. Russia is screwed as long as people like Tsiganov they cannot name the Jewish origins of the “Neo-Liberalism” that they are fighting. This war in Ukraine was a war between Judea and Russia, but the problem is that Russia is still run by Jews who will stab the Slavs in the back. Afterwards, Moscow will look like Berlin in 1945 and then will come the Nuremberg 2.0 trials that will be just as big a sham as Nuremberg 1.0.

One of the most telling characteristics of this confrontation in Khazaria is that there is only one country on the planet that has so far been allowed to remain neutral: Israel. Once again Jews running the gangster have in Tel Aviv are playing both sides of the conflict.

Please review this comment and the images below the MORE:

Hitler, the German, could have saved over 100 million Russian slaves from being genocided by a power mad Georgian Bolshevik psychopath and his blood sucking cabal of Russian hating Talmudists. Just don’t expect stupid Russian tools to figure this out, let alone recognize it. This is why it is Russia’s karma to remain a noahide slave state for eternity.

The genocide and mass murder of the Soviet Communists (rolled):

The Civil War period till 1922: 3,284,000
The NEP period till 1928: 5,484,000
The collectivization period till 1935: 16,924,000
The Great Terror period till 1938: 21,269,000
Pre-World War II period till June 1941:26,373,000
World War II period till 1945: 39,426,000
Postwar and Stalin’s twilight till 1953: 55,039,000
Post-Stalin period till 1987: 61,911,000
(R. J. Rummel: Soviet Genocide and Mass Murder since 1917, Transaction Publisher, 1990.)
It can be seen for instance, that before Hitler got into power at all, the Bolsheviks had murdered or otherwise eliminated about 12,000,000 human beings.

Given that the communist created death toll is standing at 148 million (and counting) at the moment, if the Soviet Union was decommunised in late 1941, a clear 120 million people could have remained alive. And trillions of dollars would have remained in taxpayers pockets in the western world.

“Russia was backward, corrupt, despotic and generally evil country and Russians as a motley crew of drunken rapists hell bent to invade the ‘West’ to satisfy their lust for the blond Gretchens”

Yes, that is a very good description of the Russian Red Rapist Army. I think you missed a few very critical components in that formula.

– They were clothed and fed by freemasons through Lend Lease
– They were drunk on Vodka provided by Lend Lease
– They were mercilessly driven on by Jewish barrier guards and Kommisars
– They had been mercilessly propagandized by Jews and Freemason Bolshevics
– Their families were held hostage by Jews and Freemason Bolshevics

But I think most importantly
– They still haven’t figure this out today, and this is why they are still cannon fodder for the Hebrew

Now to be fair, Germans are in exactly the same boat, but the German predicament can be justified and forgiven because they were the victims of the Russian Red Rapist Army, while the Russians themselves were the perpetrators.

I will close with this fascinating article explaining how Russians today are still victims of these same Judeo-Masonic forces that have committed waves of genocide against them, their victims the Germans, and all of Europe for over a century.

https://off-guardian.org/2021/11/16/myth-vs-reality-in-covid-russia/

I would submit that the hand shake between Putin and Schwab is a Masonic grip. Russians are still stooges for the same forces that they have been since 1917. Ditto the US and UK. For 12 years from 1933-45 Germany was free from this same Satanic control.

Clearly you are a true believer that 6 gorillion of your tribe were gassed and cremated while every Germany city over 50000 was being carpet bombed, the German war machine was grinding to a halt for lack of energy and transport, and all of Germany was starving, so the following comment will be a waste of time on you. But I will write it anyway for the benefit of others.

In 1945 the the Judeo-Masonic victors (UK, US and USSR) committed a genocide against Germany, Japan, Itally and all their allies. Of course these same forces had committed genocide against Ukraine in the 1930’s, Russia in the 1920’s and all of Europe in the First World War for Israel. And these same forces committed genocide across Asia starting in the 1950’s. In actuality, this has been an ongoing campaign of genocide primarily against all the Christian peoples of Europe, but also against all of humanity, and this genocide has not stopped even today.

Some of us Christians are capable of recognizing what is going on around us in this critical moment in history. A small clique of Freemasons and other secret society members at the very top of the pyramid are orchestrating a global genocidal depopulation agenda, and some Rabbi’s are in on it as well. The rest of the planet is too stupid and dumbed down to figure it out. Most of Judea falls into this category, and that would clearly include you.

Whether one appreciates German culture, or despises it, is not really the issue here. Whether one appreciates European culture or despises it neither. The entire global fake narrative surrounding the clot-shot has finally exposed the agenda so that the naked beast is there for all those with eyes capable of seeing to recognize. Of course if one has ears and has listened to Klaus Schwab and all the Rabbi’s, this agenda has been clear for years, just not blatantly obvious.

This is why I wrote “[what] the fake pandemic of Covid-19 represents in 2021 is a vindication of all of Hitlers actions.“. This statement holds true whether one loves, hates, or is ambivalent about Hitler, and I have never professed any great “love” for him. I consider him to be a fallible, and tragic, figure who made many mistakes. I do not rule out the possibility that he was some kind of a Masonic patsy, and I stated so in the thread above, which I ended receiving insults from Carolyn Yeager for.

But one thing is clear, at least to me, and I would suspect to many readers of this comments section. Hitler and the best of the German race went to their graves fighting these very same forces that we are confronted with today. As far as I can tell you are too unintelligent to recognize what is going on, and are therefore unwittingly participating in your own genocide. How sad and pathetic.

I will close by mentioning that I consider your statement “keep cyanide for the frau and your Walther PPK 7.65 oiled, loaded and at hand. Never know when you’ll need it.” to be a direct threat coming from a Hasbara agent like yourself.

I really appreciate Ron Unz allowing his platform to be used for free and open discussion, and I believe that everyone should be able to express their opinions without censorship as long as it does not detract from the conversation at hand. However, I would submit that threats of violence have no place on UR, and that comments like yours should get you banned.

“Molotov’s visit to Berlin in November of 1940 left the impression that Soviet interests were not directed towards a cooperative good-neighborly coexistence with Germany”

Communists lie, and people who believe their lies are nothing more than useful idiots. Just read a few of Seraphim’s comments if you need some more proof. Of course the NSDAP were already aware of this in 1939, and there was no doubt in 1940, but Churchill and Roosevelt had backed them into a corner where Stalin and an alliance with the Jewish Bolsheviks and their the useful idiot Russian stooges was the only way out.

NSDAP knew all this, and this is why they never trusted the Judeo-Bolsheviks. They well knew that eventually the true nature of the Jews running the USSR, the UK, and the US would manifest itself, just as it did, especially in 1945 and all the lies at Nuremberg.

Many, including Seraphim, would claim that the preemptive attack against the Judeo-Bolshevik empire in June 1941 was Hitlers greatest mistake. I would contend that the unveiling of the genocide of all of humanity that the fake pandemic of Covid-19 represents in 2021 is a vindication of all of Hitlers actions.

Seraphim plays on the theme of Slavic Brotherhood, but the reality appears quite different to an outside observer. Neither the Bulgarians nor the Croatians were welcoming the Russians, and the Serbs were using this proffered ‘friendship’ as a cover to realize their own chauvinistic ambitions. It is much like the Poles with their dreams of imperial greatness behind the protective and menacing shields and swords of their sponsors emerging first from Versailles.

“That the Croats enticed the Serbs to form a South-Slavic Federation to be called Yougoslavia in 1848?”

You really should work on your grammar, that sentence is incomplete. The following sentence isn’t much better:

“I think it is asking you too much.”

So much blather.

In 1848 both “Serbia” and “Croatia” were still occupied by the Ottoman empire.

This article describes what was going on pretty well:

“However, a crucial difference between the Serbian and the Croatian political leaders in regard to the creation of a common South Slavic state was their opposite opinions upon the question who has to play a principal role in this process. The Serbian politicians claimed this role to the Principality of Serbia, while their Croatian counterparts saw the Croats as the principal leaders of the Yugoslav unification. Consequently, according to the prior, Belgrade would be the capital of a united South Slavic state while the latter favored Zagreb as a South Slavic capital after the unification.”

The events in the lead up, during, and after the two world wars, and especially the behavior of the Serbs during the Yugoslav wars from 1991-2001, make clear that the Serbs were never willing to share power, just as the Russians would never share power with Ukraine after the break up of the USSR.

The article concludes with:

“Serbian writer Milan Milojević in 1881 published a map of de facto a Greater Serbia, but under the name of a Greater Yugoslavia. According to him, a Greater Yugoslavia should embrace the following territories: a geographic-historical Macedonia (up to Thessaly), whole Banat (eastward to Arad), Bačka (northward to Szeged), and all Croatian and Slovenian lands including Carinthia, Trieste and some territories beyond Isonzo river. Such borders of future Yugoslavia were also accepted by the Serbs P. Niketić in 1890 and D. Putniković in 1896 but without Slovenian lands.[20] However, in all of such projects of a Greater Yugoslavia, Serbia was seen as a Yugoslav Piedmont with Belgrade as the “Serbian Bismarckism”.”

Which is exactly my point. “Yugoslavia” was never anything other than a sugar coated “Greater Serbia”. You let your slavic mask slip when you forgot to maintain the charade and called it “Serbia” instead of the fake Versailles construct called “Yugoslavia”.

It is critical also to remember that the Russian/English coup that forced the NSDAP to intervene in “Yugoslav” politics came about only through the aggression of the Serbian officer corps. Then too, the thin veneer of a united “Yugoslavia” was stripped away by Serbian/Russian deceit, dishonor, and of course violence.

“The same was true for the British Empire.”

No doubt about it. And the “United States” too was willing, even eager, to commit genocide in order to complete and expand its empire.

The big difference among the Unz Review commenters is that UK and US citizens can acknowledge the evil that their elites have caused. Russians, and their mini-me accomplices, the Serbs, stubbornly refuse to accept their own peoples culpability for the genocide of entire nations and peoples.

In the case of Russia, we really don’t even have to argue about what they did to Germany. We can just point to Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and even more blatantly Ukraine. Once we get to Siberia, or even the ‘stans and the Caucasus, it is clear that these lands were never “Russian”, and really still aren’t today. But they all suffer the same misfortune as Latvia, Lithuania and Eastern Poland, they are all stuck with a lingering macho minority of ethnic Russians who refuse to accept history or their own peoples murderous history in butchering and ethnically cleansing the true inhabitants.

The Romanov’s weren’t even Russian, and the Bolsheviks were Jews, but that doesn’t stop Russians from getting all teary eyed over the millions of Russians who eagerly took up arms against their neighbors on their elites behalf, or the untold millions of victims of Russian debauchery and blood lust.

The real jewel in the crown of Russian genocidal shame could easily be considered to be Crimea, but it is my opinion that Königsberg should be a badge of dishonor to all Russians. Yet it isn’t. It is far too important as a hinge used for Russian leverage and intimidation of all countries across the entire Baltic. This is the real reason why Nato still exits, and why the US is so able to leverage Nordic fear of Russia into Nato bullying in regions far from the North Atlantic. It is the typical, and historical, arrogant Russian denial and attitude so evident in Seraphim’s comments. Estonia, Norway and Denmark, to name a few, would never remain within the Nato bully alliance were it not for fear of Russia and her proven historic track record over centuries of starting wars and crushing small states on her periphery.

“When Serbia decided on her own that she doesn’t want to be in the German fold, Germany invaded.”

At least we can finally stop pretending that the mongrel country created at gunpoint and named Jugo-Slavia was some kind of union, when from its inception it had a Serbian king and the Serbs were put in charge of the military. Of course the first thing the Serbs did starting in 1919, after receiving the very Pan-Serbia that had been promised to them by the Entente in exchange for starting WWI, was to start persecuting Croats, Albanians, Slovenes and Magyars. And this is also what the Serbs did the second time around after they got their asses kicked in WWII. No other country in the Balkans wants anything to do with Serbs, they are toxic, just consider what happened in 1990-95.

In a similar fashion, all of Eastern Europe, including their brethren the Ukrainians, want anything to with Russians for the same reasons. Who would, after what the Russian Rapist armies did during two world wars and after both of them.

So sure, Serbia didn’t want to be in the German fold. But Croatia, Slovenia, Albania, Macedonia, Montenegro, and all the Magyars didn’t want to be in the abomination called Jugo-Slavia which had been awarded to the blood thirsty and sadistic Serbians for their assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand and their obstinacy and trickery in settling with Austria afterwards.

For someone who is so arrogant and self important, you really should learn some simple punctuation. That entire dogs breakfast of a comment should be broken into several paragraphs before it is even worth reading, let alone worthy of a rebuttal.

“(did I forget some area?)”

Russians, dutifully, and sadistically, serving their Jewish Bolshevik owners, were waging aggressive war in Mongolia and Manchuria as well until Dzhugashvili (Stalin) signed the “neutrality” pact with Japan in April 1941 in preparation for his pre-empted invasion of Germany.

I agree with you, Fox, Russians can never swallow enough land, or Vodka.

“Russian-German relations soured in the course of Molotov’s visit to Berlin November of 1940, when Soviet plans for the Balkans were presented in a form to the German government that could only be interpreted as to subvert the agreements of the Non-Aggression Pact of the previous year”

IIRC, the empire horny Russians were again demanding control of the Bosphorus. Some things just never change. Only a fool would believe that Putin isn’t drooling over the Bosphorus today, just like Stalin and Tsar Nicholas.

Well, I think that it would be extremely profitable if you try to remedy this gap in your worldview.

In a nutshell, acc to Seraphims worldview, Russia conquered the third LARGEST world empire ever, extending from central Europe to North America, all this apparently done for defensive and/or ‘necessary’ reasons. It smells quite a bit like US ‘manifest destiny’, doesn’t it? i bet the shill Seraphim does not quite agree with these US ‘defensive’ and ‘necessary’ needs, especially when those encroach on Russia.
IOW, this guy flagrantly applies the crudest double standards, a complete hypocrite.

Not to mention he lies and makes things up in ways that would make Pinocchio blush. For ex, he casually suggested upthread that Austria-Hungary, or Germany, were the ones behind the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. Creative isn’t it? There is even a handwritten note by Nikola Pašić discussing the distribution of guns and explosives to the students, but I guess Pašić also worked for the Germans. It reminds me of some of the pro-Russia shills who still claim with a straight face the Germans shot the Poles at Katyn.
Fox

However, I as referring to the Hitler-Stalin Non-Aggression Pact of August 1939; meant for Germany to put pressure on England and Poland by robbing them of their hopeful intent to recruit the Soviet Union into their front against Germany.

Yes, for Stalin however the treaty was clearly a trap. It worked quite well for him, until it did not.

I will. Your jaundiced reactions amuse me big time.
McMeekin only joined the ‘hate Russia’ bandwagon. It is good for career advancement.

In “Stalin’s War” McMeekin lays out the degree to which Stalin was pushing for control of the Black Sea and the Dardanelles, and it was this constant pressure that made clear that Stalin’s plans were far more ambitious than just to regain the lands lost to the Russian Empire during WWI. In fact it was Hitler’s refusal to allow Stalin to dominate Bulgaria that finally led to the break up of the non-Aggression pact.

The truth here is that Stalin started WWII for precisely the same reasons Tsar Nicholas started WWI. Docherty and Macgregor go into detail about Russian expansion plans for the Dardanelles and Constantinople. First World War Hidden History:

“A crucial feature of the Entente was the alliance with Russia at the expense of the Turks, not an alliance with the Turks to protect them from Russia. Despite trying to find common ground with France and Britain, and even with their old enemy, Russia, all the overtures made by the Young Turks were dismissed. Turkey could have been a useful ally to the Entente since the Straits would have remained open to them. The American historian, Ron Bobroff concluded that a formal agreement with Turkey would have greatly improved the Triple Entente’s capacity to contain Germany, [17] but Britain and France had other plans and Russia expected to take the prize of Constantinople. This scenario could only take place once the old empire was destroyed along with Germany, and for that very reason the Young Turks were deliberately pushed into the German camp.

War fever and the prospect of taking Constantinople consumed St Petersburg. In February 1914, six full months before the First World War began, the Russian high command was planning to seize the city with an amphibious landing of 127,500 troops and heavy artillery from Odessa. Unfortunately for the Russians, one monumental problem lay ahead. The Naval staff expressed grave alarm at the prospect of the arrival in Constantinople of two battleships which were being built in Britain for the Turkish Navy. These state of the art Dreadnoughts would prevent the landings and the Black Sea fleet would have been entirely at their mercy. [18] The reason Russia was going to war was clearly and absolutely underpinned by the British and French promise of Constantinople, yet Britain was on the point of delivering two new warships which would prevent it. What was going on?”

Russia herself was on the verge of commissioning her own two dreadnaughts in Sevastopol, and they were completed in early 1915 and were used to dominate the entire black sea throughout the war. The Tsar’s ambitious plans for the Dardanelles were completely dependent on complete naval superiority. In fact, Russia already had complete naval superiority, it was only the two English dreadnaughts, or later the German cruisers that lay in her way.

“Russia made several unsuccessful requests to foreign secretary Sir Edward Grey in May and June 1914 to have the Turkish contract cancelled. By late July over 500 Turkish sailors had arrived on the Tyne in north-east England to take the first of the mighty warships to Constantinople. The Sultan Osman I and her sister ship, Reshadieh, itself almost completed, had been fully paid for, in part by generous subscriptions from the ordinary people of the Ottoman Empire. Naval regattas and street parties were planned and widespread public excitement anticipated their arrival.

By 30 July the matter became extremely urgent for the Russians. Foreign Secretary, Sergei Sazonov, warned Britain that it was a matter of ‘the highest degree of importance’ that the Turkish ships stayed in England. [19] It appears likely that the thinly veiled threat implied that, if the ships were released, the Czar would not be willing to go to war. He was not to be double-crossed over Constantinople.

Days before this, President Poincare of France had visited St Petersburg to keep the Czar on course for war. Poincare reminded him that, like the British, the French government had no objection to Russia’s taking Constantinople. [20] Within twenty-four hours of Poincare’s departure, Russia mobilised 1,100,000 men together with both the Baltic and Black Sea fleets. [21] It is extremely unlikely that she would have continued the race to war had the prize of Constantinople been denied her.”

So it not only was Germany stabbed in the back, but the Turks too. Of course the Russians were also arming the Armenians and turning them against the Turks, hence setting them up for a genocidal war too.

First Lord of the Admiralty, Winston Churchill, ordered armed troops in Newcastle to prevent Turkish sailors boarding Sultan Osman I, and specifically instructed that the Turkish flag should not be raised over the ship. The response throughout the Ottoman Empire was of utter outrage. Churchill explained that the warships were vital to Britain, and ‘with a margin of only seven dreadnoughts we could not afford to do without these two fine ships,’ [22] but the truth ran much deeper. The Turkish warships were retained at the eleventh hour for fear of Russian reaction and last-minute rejection of war.

The retention of the Turkish warships served two important functions for the Secret Elite: It kept the Czar on track and it steered the angry Turks towards the enemy camp. As late as July 1914 the majority of the Turkish cabinet had been ‘friendly disposed’ towards Britain, [23] but the act that drove them away from the Entente was the British government’s seizure of the two dreadnoughts. As an essay in provocation, it was breathtaking. [24] ‘If Britain wanted deliberately to incense the Turks and drive them into the Kaiser’s arms she could not have chosen more effective means.’ [25]

For the Secret Elite, two positive outcomes accrued from withholding the ships, but in consequence, a shadow was cast over their long term plan for the Middle East. Russia had been placated and her mobilisation continued towards its inevitable outcome, war. As was always intended, Turkey’s overtures were spurned and she was relentlessly pushed into the German camp. But without the two Turkish Dreadnoughts, what was to stop the Russians sailing into Constantinople when the opportunity presented itself. The answer was already cruising in the Mediterranean.

I realize that Seraphim is going to start spewing his usual drivel about Docherty and Macgregor just as he does with McMeekin. Likely he will start kvetching about people claiming that “Russia is always wrong”. The real problem here is that Russians, just like the Poles, and the Serbs, refuse to accept the combination of their macho arrogance and gullibility to their elites caused Europe to be dragged into two world wars.

We can see precisely the same dynamic in operation today as the planet is at the brink of another world war. Macho Poles, macho Russians, macho white Russians, macho Serbs and macho Ukrainians all too stupid to be able to understand themselves, their own history, and the degree to which Judeo has played them for fools.

‘The Russian Origins of the First World War’ by Sean McMeekin.

Some REVIEWS:

“This book should forever change the ways we have understood the role of Russia in the First World War.”―Michael S. Neiberg, author of Dance of the Furies: Europe and the Outbreak of World War I

“A bold reinterpretation of the Russian Empire’s entry into the First World War. McMeekin argues that Russia believed a European war to be in its interest, that it sought to humiliate Vienna, and that it hoped to conquer Constantinople and the Ottoman Straits.”―Mustafa Aksakal, author of The Ottoman Road to War in 1914

“The Russian Origins of the First World War is a polemic in the best sense. Written in a lively and engaging style, it should provoke a much-needed debate on Russia’s role in the Great War.”―Michael Reynolds, author of Shattering Empires: The Clash and Collapse of the Ottoman and Russian Empires, 1908-1918

“Going against a century of received wisdom, Bilkent University professor McMeekin offers a dramatic new interpretation of WWI…Rifling the archives, analyzing battle plans, and sifting through the machinations of high diplomacy, McMeekin reveals the grand ambitions of czarist Russia, which wanted control of the Black Sea straits to guarantee all-weather access to foreign markets. Maneuvering France and England into a war against Germany presented the best chance to acquire this longed-for prize. No empire had more to gain from the coming conflict, and none pushed harder to ensure its arrival. Once unleashed, however, the conflagration leapt out of control, and imperial Russia herself ranked among its countless victims.”―Publishers Weekly

“As Sean McMeekin argues in this bold and brilliant revisionist study, Russia was as much to blame as Germany for the outbreak of the war. Using a wide range of archival sources, including long-neglected tsarist documents, he argues that the Russians had ambitions of their own (the dismantling of the Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman empires, no less) and that they were ready for a war once they had secured a favorable alliance with the British and the French.”―British historian Orlando Figes, Sunday Times

What is missing here is better coverage of the French and BRITISH angles, but there other authors who cover those quite well.

Nor is McMeekin the first to explore the issue of Russian responsibility at all, since Tsarist archives made public after WWI already made several historians take Russia’s role into account. A bit more recently there was also George F Kennan 1984 ‘The Fateful Alliance: France, Russia, and the Coming of the First World War’ which covers some of the same ground as McMeekin.

Keep trolling though; killing the messenger in order for people not to read the letter is really all you got.

One question for you is why do racial supremacist jews like yourself insist on visiting sites where your centuries of tikkum olan well known, openly discussed and not liked.

We cannot really prove that there was political targeting of red states or conservative districts, but it is undeniable that was a such large degree of variance between the batches that it cannot simply be written off as incompetence or production quality control.

Therefore we have to conclude that they were continuing their experiments with different concoctions. Clearly they must have the precise mixture of ingredients for each “lot” in order to track and refine the brew for whatever purpose. This is why the FDA wants 55 years to release the details of the Pfizer data used for the EUA, which allowed changing their brew in the first place. But it wasn’t just Pfizer who was testing different mixtures, Moderna was doing the same thing.

He may stand shoulder to shoulder with the jews in his list of “giants”, like Cohen, Lippman and Greenwald. They, like Ron Unz, have immunity from insatiable the lust for revenge of Jewish Power.

Of all the “giants” listed in this article, Irving, and perhaps Assange and Lindberg, are in a class of their own. They stood up to Jewish Power. But only Irving truly named the jew.

Hitler’s final demand, that 95% German Danzig be returned to Germany just as its inhabitants desired, was an absolutely reasonable one, and only a dreadful diplomatic blunder by the British had led the Poles to refuse the request, thereby provoking the war.

Blunder? Typical Zio propaganda. International Jewry had declared war on Germany in 1933. The British had been preparing for war long before it started …. Britain needed an incident and they encouraged Poland to create one .. Unz should catalog this book , written in 1936 – “Left Wing ‘Left Wings Over Europe, or How to Make a War About Nothing’by British man of letters Wyndham Lewis

It seems that the UR comments section always attracts arrogant know-it-all jerks who come out with irrelevant insults like: “I’m not going to respond to the rest of the nonsense…”

Here are Wilson’s 14 points:

Note that there is no demand for “democratic transition of power *before* the armistice”, and democracy is clearly in the eye of the beholder anyway.

The collapse of the Axis had far less to do with Germany’s military situation that the looming starvation of Germans and Austrians. Germany made it through the Turnip winter of 1919 while under illegal blockade and without the Eastern European farm lands that she had control over after Brest-Litovsk. Hubert Hoover had been pumping food into Germany since 1915 through his commission for Belgian relief in order to keep Germany in the war. The entire collapse was orchestrated by external and treasonous ((internal)) forces. “Bankruptcy” is not very relevant if you are under blockade, and has far more to do with secret Judaic and Masonic plans than trade balances with the Entente.

“And after what they’d inflicted on French and Belgian soil”

Fuck off, you lying kike.

Here are a few web sites giving details about “Global Leaders for Tomorrow”, rebranded, in 2004, as “Young Global Leaders”. This is important because it explains how they can get every health department and all politicians in every western country operating in synchronized lockstep pushing plandemic panic and the blood sacrifice clot-shot.

http://greeknewsondemand.com/2021/11/22/how-is-the-davos-world-economic-forum-involved-in-the-coronavirus-pandemic/

https://wikispooks.com/wiki/WEF/Global_Leaders_for_Tomorrow

https://wikispooks.com/wiki/WEF/Young_Global_Leaders

“It didn’t say anything about guilt or responsibility for causing the war. ”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_231_of_the_Treaty_of_Versailles

“The Allied and Associated Governments affirm and Germany accepts the responsibility of Germany and her allies for causing all the loss and damage to which the Allied and Associated Governments and their nationals have been subjected as a consequence of the war imposed upon them by the aggression of Germany and her allies.”

You forgot to mention Wilson’s 14 points and the Armistice. If the Kaiser, and Germany, had known that the Entente was going to deceive and then starve Germany and strip her of millions of German inhabitants and territory, it is extremely doubtful that in the absence of a Dolchstoss (Stab in the Back) that they would have surrendered. But any student of WWI knows that already the Balfour agreement had been signed and the Judeo-Communists had seized control of Russia. The Jewish Power in Germany was ready for their own revolution and this predicated on the punitive terms of Versailles, the starvation, and the ensuing chaos.

In Switzerland there is an important initiative (plebiscite) on November 28 to extend and enhance the emergency powers to the Health Department (BAG). The Swiss Federal Government, along with the Medical Industrial Complex and the media are pulling out all the stops to get it passed. Indications, at least in both the government monopolized media and the judaic media, are that the vaxx-whores are going to win. If it does pass, Switzerland will almost certainly face lockdowns for the unvaxxed like Austria.

One must recognize that Switzerland has long been dominated by big Pharma. Now it is only Novartis and Roche, but earlier it was Sandoz, Ciba, Geigy, Roche and others. Lonza, a large industrial company, put up a plant in 2020 costing billions to manufacture the Moderna clot-shot in Switzerland, and it has a large conflicted interest to see lots of Moderna Boosters forced on people across Europe. Additionally, GAVI was allowed to set up head quarters in Geneva and has all the rights of a sovereign nation. There are a lot of people who have financial interests in the “success” of the plandemic. Swiss media recently performed a typical orchestrated hit against Ivermectin following the US script and calling it horse paste.

And don’t forget that the World Economic Forum is based in Davos. Below is a great video laying (english subtitles) out how the Klaus/WEF has been working to brain wash young leaders into following the globalist agenda through their “global leaders program”. It turns out that Merkel, Draghi, Blair and many other slime ball politicians all graduated from their first class. Since then their grasp over many countries has only gotten worse.

Video Link

Cui Bono?

Right, this is why Israel was one of the countries to mass-vaccinate itself.

Orthodox Jews have a religious exemption from getting the shot(s)

So the portion of the population that is the most nationalistic, the most religious, the most intolerant of other faiths and most importantly, the most fecund, will remain healthy and able to reproduce.

There are many interesting and revealing pieces of information in the book that support this article.
Unfortunately McMeekin is a true believer in the myth of the 6 gorillion, and he completely fails to link many critical events happening simultaneous to his narrative because he is clearly afraid of Jewish Power and its ability to torpedo his book, his position at Bard, and his entire life.

Stephen Cohen was a snobby douchebag communist who lived his entire privileged life under the protective umbrella of Jewish Power. Even after his fellow Jew Victoria Nuland sold Ukraine down the river to the same ZOG USA that supported Cohen’s privileged existence, and against his more beloved “ex” communist Russia, Cohen could not name the Jew, and he never did his entire life, because he himself was the worst kind of jewish apologist. Cohen spent his entire life lying and propagating talmudic lies to stupid goyim. Cohen was certainly no giant, and it is an insult to place his hideously ugly Jewish face on the same page as a true hero of the truth like David Irving.

Because the US became an Imperium after WW2 , you want to apply that retroactively to WW1. Okay, prove it with something.

What a silly person you are.

It is generally accepted that US imperialism began in 1898. But even that is totally false.

The US was expansionist from the moment it became an independent country.

David Ray Griffin writes, in “The American Trajectory: Divine or Demonic?”:

…
American imperialism is often said to have begun in 1898, when Cuba and the Philippines were the main prizes.1
What was new at this time, however, was only that America took control of countries beyond the North American continent.

As John Bassett Moore, who had been an assistant secretary of state at that time, later wrote:

“It is true that the expansion of 1898 involved . . . the taking of a step geographically in advance of any that had been taken before; but so far as concerns the acquisition of new territory we were merely following a habit which had characterized our entire national existence.2”

This statement is of utmost importance, because it points out that, already in 1898, imperial conquest was a long-standing habit of American policy makers. America had been engaged in expansionism from the outset.

That the USA was already a global imperialistic power before WW2 is fully documented.
Major General Smedley Darlington Butler, at the time of his death, the most decorated Marine in U.S. history, had this to say of American wars:

I spent 33 years and four months in active military service and during that period I spent most of my time as a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer; a gangster for capitalism.

I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. I helped purify Nicaragua for the International Banking House of Brown Brothers in 1902–1912. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for the American sugar interests in 1916. I helped make Honduras right for the American fruit companies in 1903. In China in 1927 I helped see to it that Standard Oil went on its way unmolested. Looking back on it, I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents.

“The first was the mounting economic dependence of a now prospering America on sales to Britain, France and Russia.”

I have certain issues with that statement. Sure, “Yankees” and “Wasps”, especially on the East Coast, were prospering from increased demand from all the lending going on to war torn Europe, but for the US heartland itself, this manifested itself in excess demand and inflation. Jewish owned banks, gold mines and arms industry had been raking in profits just like they are during the plandemic today, but that should not be confused with the prosperity of farmers, miners and factory workers who were facing inflation, and after 1917 simultaneous wage suppression and financial repression.

Whereas the working classes of England, France, Germany and Austria may have had a stake and been fighting for the national “honor” or “culture”, in the US the working classes had no real stake in the war. Perhaps they benefitted on the margin by increased world wide wartime inflationary demand, but I would contend that it was this inflationary demand itself that ended up destroying the world wide gold standard and subjecting the US working classes to the monetary inflation that continues to this day.

In the absense of this first world banker war for Israel, the US working class would have likely benefitted from the slow deflation of rising productivity. Instead, ultimately, they got Roosevelts gold seizure and the great Judaic depression.

Big Jewish Pharma definitely seems to be obsessed with injecting small goyish children. This obsession seems to correlate to the Judaic obsession with having sex with children of every age. Rabbi’s have stated that sex with a goy child under 3 years of age is not a sin.

Of course blood sacrifice is another sin that Jews are famous for, and this fame is exceeded only by their willingness of their entire tribe to commit any sin to keep it covered up.

Now there are reports streaming in from across the planet of still born babies and new born babies having heart issues.

2,620 Dead Babies in VAERS After COVID Shots – More Fetal Deaths in 11 Months than Past 30 Years Following ALL Vaccines

This judaic assault against the smallest and most vulnerable goy children was deliberately ignored by Big Jewish Pharma during the trails and the EUA (Emergency Use Authorization), This can not be considered an accident or mere negligence. Malfeasance does not even begin to describe what Big Jewish Pharma has done. The only expression that comes close to describing what they have done is blood sacrifice.

I’ll point out that what to do with hands, for public figures being photographed, is an age-old problem.

LOL. There are dozens of paintings of famous and powerful people doing the triad claw in the blog below. Perhaps for a quick photograph there is a small chance that one could make the claw accidentally. But in dozens of paintings spread over centuries? Hitler is making the gesture in 2 paintings and a photograph. Additionally, there are plenty of historians who point out that the SS was modelled on the Jesuit order. Just sayin’, not necessarily believing.

Triad Claw Symbolism

“The “triad claw” is a Marrano gesture which signals the letters M & W, symbolizing 666 from the three V’s. The letter V is “waw” in Hebrew and “vav” in Gematria and is the 6th letter in both. This hand sign has been linked to freemasonry but predates it back to approximately the 1200’s. Many have tied the hand sign to the Rosicrucian’s, Jesuits, and Knights of Malta.”

I am sure L.K. can explain better that I why the US is as culpable as many European countries for the war, but I am going to express some of my own thoughts anyway.

“#1 – Please inform me of the “huge responsibility for how the war ENDED” “

The Kaiser, and Germany, signed the Armistice in good will due to “Wilson’s” 14 points that had been made in a speech before congress in January 1918. Among many of the provisions that were ignored as soon as the Deutsches Heer laid down their arms was the continuation of the genocidal embargo of Germany. You will argue that this was not “Wilson’s” fault and try to blame Clemanceau, but the deceit, and the following genocide, originated in the US.

We must also examine US actions in the days before the signing on November 11, when thousands of US forces died attacking German positions while Germans had laid down their arms and were waiting for the exact appointment and time for the signing. This shows the true nature of the US Judeo-Masonic Army.

#2 – Declaring war requires a pretext

The world already knew the nature of US imperialism long before 1917. The refusal of the Yankees to turn over Fort Sumpter in 1861 should already be proof enough, or even Reconstruction, but there was already much more US thirst for blood and depravity. The Spanish American war was started with the Maine false flag operation. The entire one-sided and barbaric sinking of the Spanish fleet in Manila gave the world a taste for the blood lust of what was already ZOG-US. Hearst famously stated “You provide the pictures, I’ll provide the war”. The Philipine American war that went on after the US had promised independence foreshadows what happened in Europe twice after the US intervened in two world wars.

The Balfour declaration and the Dolchstoss (stabbing of Germany in the back) was based on the promise of US Zionists to bring the US into the war in exchange for Judea getting Palestine. Of course we have the Lusitania false flag and the fake Zimmerman telegram to put the icing on the cake.

We can also see starting from the rise of German Nationalism in 1933 that the US Zio-media was working diligently to create “pretexts” out of thin air from the moment Hitler was voted into power. Another good example was Kaufmann’s book “Germany Must Perish”, released in 1941 before the US had even entered the war, already fanning the flames of genocide.

#3 – How did the US make it possible for Clemenceau to be the #1 villain

The US could have ended the war at any point in time within months of it starting by simply remaining neutral, which she never did because the US wanted WWI as much as she wanted the Spanish American war as much as she wanted WWII as much as she wanted the Civil War as much as she wanted the Iraq wars as much as she wanted to invade Syria.

Germany was ripe for a peace settlement before the war even started, but the Jewish Power running the US had their own goals: Destruction white European pride, destruction of the German, Russian and Austro-Hungarian empires, debt enslavement of all of the planet, genocide of Germany, and last but not least, Palestine. “Wilson’s” 14 points were the only peace offer the Entente ever threw to the Axis, and in hind sight we can clearly see that it was all a ruse. Sure, the narrative that American’s want to believe, is that the US, shining city on a hill, offered a noble and honorably peace, but those nasty power hungry European racists ruined it all. That simply isn’t true and the Armistice was based of a fraud that originated in the US.

If the US had been honorable instead of Judaic, it would have stayed out of the conflict and remained neutral from the beginning.

Finally, in light of the current ongoing plandemic, I also think that the actions of the Rockefeller family, and their age old lust for vaccinations, caused the Spanish flu, and the coincident arrival of boatloads of infected US troops into a vulnerable war weary European population seems to be deliberate. This needs a thorough re-examination and most likely historical revision.

Sure, the handshake with Mannerheim is not clear enough to warrant a “gotcha”, but it is suspicious, and when taken in context with the other masonic grips in the link I provided I consider it to be pretty damning.

But the real kicker is claw hand sign. It shows up in two of Knirr’s paintings which he supposedly made based on photographs, and in both of those Knirr paintings he appears to be making a lions claw with his other hand. There is also the famous photograph of Hitler in Lerderhosen making the claw.

There are also numerous decisions and events that occurred during the war that could also be circumstantial evidence of a bigger, Judaic and/or globalist plot. I mentioned above Finland’s behavior before, during and after Barbarossa. Dunkirk comes to mind as well. Stalingrad anyone? Of course we also have the firebombing and nuclear attacks performed by UK and US. Stalin’s genocide of his own people before the war, starting with the Holodomor also make more sense if we accept that it was more about genocide than eliminating resistance to the Judaic takeover of Russia.

As the magnitude of the degree of sheer evil behind this plandemic comes ever closer into focus, it seems to me that things that have happened in recent history can and should be re-examined and reflected on based on this newly acquired knowledge.

[MORE]

No, what’s actually painfully obvious is that YOU, as an American PARTISAN, try so VERY hard to pretend the USA does not share a huge responsibility for how the war ENDED.
You point out the OBVIOUS British lobbying efforts, which played an important role which i never denied, but purposefully ignore US ECONOMIC – not British – INTERESTS in joining the Entente at the end.

Carolyn Yeager:

It’s been clear all along that Clemenceau’s France was the #1 villain at the Peace Treaty, followed by Lloyd George. NOT Wilson.

Yes, and who made that possible? The US did… and just to be clear, I have never claimed the US had anything to do with starting the Great War, rather I blame it for making possible its disastrous ending.
BUT, I do very much blame the US government, more than any other party, for later fomenting WW2… you may dislike it, but that is your problem.

C.Y:

Don’t blame the USA, who was invited, yea entreated, to save Europe from itself–it’s reckless blunders and indecisiveness–for over a century already. It’s getting old. We in America have our own battles to fight to maintain our freedom without responsibility for Europe added.

Oh, poor innocent Imperium USA.
Close your fucking 800 plus military bases all over the world, stop your never ending war-mongering and wars, your criminal sanctions, your economic imperialism, and you’ll notice people will stop talking about your damn country very quickly.

without the vindictive “peace” of the victors, made possible by the US entry on the Entente side, there would not have been a WW2 at all …

What’s painfully obvious is that you try so hard to relieve the guilt on Europe and pin as much on Wilson and the USA as you can for the destructive “anti-European” Versailles Treaty. But the facts have been clear all along — the worst offender was France, followed by England. Last comes the hapless Wilson, who DID want to enforce his Fourteen Points that gave Germany some hope & relief, but the short-sighted and politically-pressured Lloyd George of England, Orlando of Italy, and especially Clemenceau of France were not interested in a future peaceful Europe as much as in retribution and sticking Germany with all their war expenses. They ignored Wilson’s 14 Points, voting them down, thus setting the stage for WW2.

The USA, led by Republican Senate Leader Henry Cabot Lodge, refused to join the Allied-inspired and controlled “League of Nations” on the grounds it would become a supra-national government — just what the United Nations has become.

So while I have nothing against the book you’re recommending, it’s nothing new from what I can see from your quotes. It’s been clear all along that Clemenceau’s France was the #1 villain at the Peace Treaty, followed by Lloyd George. NOT Wilson. That doesn’t mean I don’t totally disapprove of Woodrow Wilson on all grounds, but you seem to be looking for ways to blame the USA for everything.

England did everything in it’s power to bring the US into the war … from the beginning! The American people wanted no part of it /i> –except for a powerful Anglo faction.

England and the pro-England population of the U.S. worked from day one to smear and stain, and lie about Germany and even German-Americans who were caught between their affection for their German homeland (which Anglo-Americans openly exhibited for England without fear or hesitation!), and their loyalty to their new home in America. It was an ugly scene, but it was not at all because Americans wanted to rule the world, but because of the underhanded secret maneuverings by the pro-Anglo media and majorities. England did more to undermine American democratic values and it’s desire to stay out of foreign entanglements than anyone else. France did more to undermine peace in Europe following the Great War than any other country.

European leaders have failed the European people, time and time again, and are doing so even now as I write. Don’t blame the USA, who was invited, yea entreated, to save Europe from itself–it’s reckless blunders and indecisiveness–for over a century already. It’s getting old. We in America have our own battles to fight to maintain our freedom without responsibility for Europe added.

Nice comment, /sarc. I have seen you write thousands of words in comments quibbling about the smallest details about the Third Reich, but when I state and provide photographic evidence of Masonic messaging by AH, all you can say is LOL? Of course it is precisely the same with all those slavic Stalin lovers. They have nothing to say about all the Masonic messaging by Stalin. Ron Unz can say nothing to all the photographs of Roosevelt and Truman in their Masonic Regalia. There is loads of letters and other proof that Churchill was also up to his neck in the Masonic brotherhood.

This reminds me of how all the vaxx whores refuse to deal with the issue of where Covid originated. Even Ron Unz will adamantly insist that Covid was a Neocon creation, yet any discussion of the broader implications of this “fact” are forbidden on any of his Covid threads where he derides them as the fantasies of deranged nutters..

I have little doubt that Churchill was making, or trying to make, secret deals with Stalin during that period. After all, they were both Masonic brothers and most likely had channels of communication that we still are unaware of today.

Ron Unz has written several comments about Operation Pike, where England and France were ostensibly planning to make bombing strikes against the Caucasus oil fields and oil infrastructure at Baku and Batumi. According to Sean McMeekin these plans were one reason why Stalin ordered the execution of Poland’s military elite at Katyn Forest in March 1940. This also conveniently coincides with the Moscow Peace Treaty in March 1940 between Finland and Russia. Again, Finland seems to be a critical player as the war is set up, and again, Finland manages to escape with her hide intact.

I personally do believe that Churchill was plotting with Stalin, likely through Masonic lodges or Rabbinical communication channels, and that Operation Pike was a ruse. Perhaps it was all a fascade for the benefit of France, whose army was later stabbed in the back when England withdrew to Dunkirk and left a giant hole in the French left flank.

Again, this looks to me like strategic moves in a grand Masonic plan. To me the most critical unanswered question is whether Hitler played a role in the plan or merely fell victim to it.

That link to the Axis history forum is quite interesting. I have long pondered over the failure of Mannerheim and Finland to support Germany in Barbarossa. Most importantly, the failure to cut the rail line from Murmansk to Moskow could alone account for the defeat at Stalingrad.

Comment #6 about:
“ret. Major Erkki Hautamäki has written an interesting book, “Finland in the eye of the storm””
has some interesting information:

Serbia was a country, corroded by chauvinistic fever dreams, crazy about becoming a great power, envious of Austria, full of misgivings about not being able to acquire more territory quickly. It’s a sort of madness, and what I see is this:
Russia had its own war games which included gaining possession of the Bosphorus, moving its borders westward on the expense of Austria and Germany. France had its own war aims also, which were in the first place aiming at getting satisfaction for the defeat of 1871; it was entirely self-induced, for it was France seeking war with and declaring on Prussia. It ended with depriving France of most of the German provinces taken from Germany in previous unprovoked attacks by France. Wounded pride, and envy at the prowess displayed by the new Germany in everything it turned its attention to, was at the bottom of it.
Then there is England….. no real points of contention except that in the 1890s a mood of envious contempt of Germany gained ground in England. A psychology of nations might reveal some insights, but the fact of turning from a sort of friendly non-interest to contempt may be taken in itself as motive power to take the path towards an eventual war.
The common enmity towards Germany found its outlet in forming military alliance between these three countries, secret until Aug 3, 1914 between England and France.
And indeed, despite all the details which might be pulled out from archives about ‘amicable talks between emissaries, suggested conferences’ etc. in the immediately preceding days of the outbreak of the war in 1914, the war had been prepared for against Germany, not Austria, and it was Germany not any one of the Entente powers who made efforts-repeated efforts- to avert the catastrophe of the war; and the machinery of a European war against Germany was put in motion by various actions of Russia, England and France: Such as the General Mobilization of Russia and Russia’s incursion in East Prussia at a time when the time accorded to Russia by Germany to suspend Mobilization and before a declaration of war against Russia (apparently Germany was adhering to rules of propriety).
Or the asinine refusal of Grey in London to give any assurance to the German ambassador to stay out of a conflict on the Continent, and Grey had full knowledge of the imminence of armed conflict. France and Russia would not have dared to strike at Germany alone, they needed England’s involvement, an eventuality carefully and secretly prepared for since the beginning of the secret ‘conversations between the General Staffs of France and England’. No sooner than von Lichnowsky had left Grey’s presence in London was the outcome known in France, and then in Russia, and this was the green light to go ahead.
Or the equally asinine reply by the French government how France would act in case of an armed conflict between Germany and Russia. Answer: ‘France will do what its national interest requires’.
So they all conveyed that they indeed had encircled Germany and acted in concert to strike at Germany.
Germany, being weaker than the combined force putting it in a vice from the West and the East had no choice than striking immediately should any hope of prevailing be maintained. Nonetheless, it seems that Russia struck first on August 1.
Germany could take up the sword in good conscience in self-defense. It turned out that despite the gleeful calculations of a fast victory through overwhelming force of numbers in men and weaponry, Germany did not yield. For a sort of victory, they sold their and Europe’s soul to America.

Each year brings more to the consciousness of the post-War world that the war was carefully planned in London, Paris and St. Petersburg. And it was planned by stupid people who held government posts. The common man did not clamor for it.

“Seems like the Bundesnetzagentur, the German energy regulator, woke up from a deep slumber just to find out that the Swiss-based company Nord Stream 2 AG did not meet the conditions to be an “independent transmissions operator” and could be certified only if it was “organized in a legal form under German law.””

The US threatened sactions against allseas, the swiss pipelaying company, who were forced to withdraw her ships from laying Nordstream II. Now Germany is shafting the Swiss again by withdrawing permits from Nord Stream 2 AG.

It sure seems like every time the ZOG-US bitch slaps Germany, Germany turns around and bitch slaps Switzerland.

Another point that Escobar misses here is that Germany is getting ready to lock down the “unvaccinated” the way Austria has, and Italy and France are already softening the battlefield for the next wave of restrictions against the “vaccine hesitant” with simultaneous predictive programming propaganda campaigns threatening lockdowns as well.

Clearly the Judeo-globalists are planning a grand conjunction of all their anti-white pogroms. Simultaneous crisis of Global Warming, Bioweapons Plandemic, Refugee Invasion, Cold War, Hyperinflation, Food Shortages, and Energy shortages, are going to unite into a civilizational perfect storm against White European across the planet. The Dark Winter has arrived. This also happens to confirm Deagle projections of massive population losses in the US, Germany and the UK.

Meanwhile the sheeple of the EU, UK and US are off in lala land dancing with the stars.

An interesting video channel with interesting clips and speeches from the Deutsche Wochenshau

https://www.bitchute.com/search/?query=blitzkriegvideos&kind=video&sort=new

Repeating over and over again a lie doesn’t make it true.

Yawnn, you must have typed that while looking at yourself in the mirror.

Who is Effenberger? Who the hell are you?? You do at least know who Gavrilo Princip was, right? I quoted his own words in bold in the German excerpt above. Not good enough for you eh? In plain English then: Source: The Sleepwalkers, by C. Clark( I know, I know, you hate him too, as you hate all sources who unmask your ridiculous obfuscation attempts…):

It should be emphasized that the archduke was not targeted on account of any alleged hostility to the Slavic minorities in the Austro-Hungarian Empire, but, on the contrary, because, to borrow the words of his assassin, Gavrilo Princip, ‘as future Sovereign he would have prevented our union by carrying through certain reforms’.131( Session of 12 October 1914, transcribed in Albert Mousset, Un drame historique: l’attentat de Sarajevo (Paris, 1930), p. 131.)

Princip was alluding to the archduke’s reputed support for structural reforms of the monarchy that would assign more autonomy to the Slavic lands. Many within the Serbian irredentist milieu recognized this idea as a potentially catastrophic threat to the reunificationist project. If the Habsburg monarchy were to transform itself successfully into a tripartite entity governed from Vienna along federal lines, with Zagreb, for example, as a capital with the same status as Budapest, there was the danger that Serbia would forfeit its vanguard role as the Piedmont of the South Slavs.

The targeting of the archduke thus exemplified one abiding strand in the logic of terrorist movements, namely that reformers and moderates are more to be feared than outright enemies and hardliners.

American historian Sean McMeekin:

Since details tracing threads of the conspiracy to Belgrade began emerging in the 1920s, few informed observers have doubted Apis’s—and thus semiofficial Serbian—culpability in the crime. No serious historians do today.

In fact, Nikola Pašic, the Serbian Prime Minister was himself involved.

Whatever actual strategic concerns had existed were taken care of at Munich in 1938. The occupation of Czechoslovakia in March 1939 was not determined by any concern over Czechoslovakia as a strategic threat but by the program of driving to the east for living space.

It’s woefully remiss to discuss 60s music seriously, without discussing the Laurel Canyon operation launching all those ‘famous 60s music groups’ – many 1960s musicians being children of CIA agents, military officers etc., as the late great David McGowan documented:
https://centerforaninformedamerica.com/inside-the-lc-the-strange-but-mostly-true-story-of-laurel-canyon-and-the-birth-of-the-hippie-generation-part-i/

One example – the Doors’ Jim Morrison was the son of Admiral Morrison who ran the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin false flag essentially starting the full-scale US-Vietnam war … many other 60s music people like that, the public never learning their 60s fave bands were often gov-intel kids.

The 60s sex-drugs music scene, turned out to be run by gov-intel-media oligarchs to wreck righteous white culture, just like the gangsta-rap stuff has been peddled in recent decades, as part of oligarch efforts to destroy positive potential in black community life.

Young Jim Morrison and his father, war-starting Admiral Morrison, aboard the US Navy Bonhomme Richard:

In regards to the creation by the victorious powers of those hostile satellite states set up to encircle Germany, US historian Thomas Fleming has a good, concise description of the whole mess in his book ” The Illusion of victory’:

The French, still obsessed by their fear of Germany, were unilaterally turning the states born of the breakup of the Austro-Hungarian and Russian empires into military satellites on Germany’s borders. French officers and weaponry poured into Poland, Czechoslovakia and Rumania. Poland had raised an army of 600,000, and the Czechs 250,000; the Rumanians were industriously imitating them. All these armies soon began shooting at each other over disputed slices of territory. Ray Stannard Baker, Wilson’s press secretary, glumly informed the president that there were no less than fourteen small wars in progress in supposedly pacified Europe.

Around the same time, Baker overheard

Lloyd George denouncing Europe’s small states as troublemakers and expensive in the bargain. The prime minister assailed the “monstrous demands of Czechoslovakia” as typical of the “miserable ambitions of the small states

. ”
So much for the war to end all wars on behalf of small countries such as poor little Belgium.44
…
Earlier in the day, after Wilson had read the full treaty, he had confessed to Ray Stannard Baker,“If I were a German, I think I should never sign it.” these were the words of a man who had abandoned interest in fighting for his Fourteen Points.

Instead of a friendly neighbor, as in Austria-Hungary, Germany now had as a neighbor a hostile Allied sattelite that looked like a dagger thrust deep into the heart of German territory.
This can be easily seen by looking at the map:

A hostile Czechoslovakia, which is what it was, constituted a serious and quite real security risk from the German standpoint.
Instead of looking for a modus vivendi with Germany that might have been acceptable, the Czech government persecuted the ethnic Germans, who made up the SECOND LARGEST ethnic group after the Czechs(NO, it was NOT the Slovaks), and established military alliances with France and the Soviet Union.
That the Czech oppression of the ethnic Germans was quite real is not in question and was admitted even by the vicious Brit Germanophobe and war monger, Lord Vansittart, then Permanent Under-Secretary at the Foreign Office:

“The plain fact is that the Sudetendeutsche are being oppressed by the Czechs”.

The French Prime Minister Daladier explained to Chamberlain the importance of Czechoslovakia for France:

“in any military operation there are wonderful possibilities for attacking Germany from Czechoslovak territory.”

The French Air Minister Pierre Cot gave more details as to why France and England needed Czechoslovakia:

“because from this state the German economy and the German industry are most easily to be destroyed with bombs. . . . Joint attacks of the French and Czech air forces can very quickly destroy all German production facilities.”

Czech chauvinism disgruntled its various ethnic groups and, after the union of Sudetenland to Germany, the artificial construct that was Czechoslovakia, as you mentioned, lost internal cohesion. Other neighbors, Poland and Hungary, who had ethnic minorities inside the country, were looking to pounce and take bites at it, the Slovaks wanted independence.
The Protectorate solution may not have been the best, but the whole thing was a lot more complex and nuanced than propagandists make it sound.

Zio-trolls like the Dunce seem to be impervious to rebuke, TV.
This moron issues contentless referenceless pabulum despite multiple castigations.
“Patrick McNally”, no matter how many times he is corrected, keeps on putting out similar Court Historian analysis plus blatant untruths …
Raches is simply an in-your-face Hyena.
“John Johnson”, Inciter, others …

Most UR readership never comments, sees this ongoing process of Truth emerging despite continuing obfuscation/blather. And Truth is emerging, as it is bound to emerge and conquer lies, even the cleverly-constructed lies that we have all been fed, and our parents, for well over a century.

So in a way the Dunce/others are helpful to the process of Truth emerging.
They provide examples of what to avoid.

Sir, Seraphim is merely a well known pro-Russia activist who hangs around this webzine, and that is why he is trying to deceive you by pushing the completely discredited anti-German German historian Fritz Fischer and his refuted thesis.

Look, you mentioned you have read ‘Hidden History’. What does it have to say about F. Fischer and his thesis of sole German guilt? Quoting from the book you mentioned:

In 1961, Fritz Fischer, professor of history at Hamburg University, rocked the academic world with his book Germany’s Aims in the First World War. He presented selected evidence from German archives to ‘prove’ Germany had indeed deliberately abused the archduke’s assassination and the July crisis as an excuse to go to war. Here, surely, was the final proof: German fault proven by a German historian. The Times immediately sang the praises of Fischer’s book…

The book helped suppress the truth for decades, but in 2006 Marc Trachtenberg, professor of political science at the University of California, demolished Fischer’s thesis. Amongst other elementary ‘errors’, Fischer had distorted and misrepresented documents, and paraphrased conversations that did not correspond to the actual wording.36
Although now widely accepted as highly suspect, Fischer’s thesis continues to receive support in Britain.”

It must be said that Fischer’s “thesis” has been utterly destroyed by several other historians besides Marc Trachtenberg ever since it appeared in 61.
For instance; American-Jewish historian Paul Edward Gottfried, in the article The Innocence of Germany, re the idiotic “Fischer thesis”:

Back in January 1975, I published a feature essay for The Alternative (later to become the thoroughly neocon American Spectator) in which I tried to sum up the critical scholarship centering on Fischer’s Griff nach der Weltmacht. After presenting the refutations of Golo Mann, Egmont Zechlin, Gerhard Ritter, and Hans-Dietrich Erdmann, historians who could not reasonably be described as rightwing German nationalists or enthusiastic defenders of the German Second Empire, I noted that barring further archival revelations, Fischer’s depiction of the German government and German people as providing a sufficient cause for the First World War stood discredited.

Although those new revelations did not materialize, what I did not foresee was the alliance of indiscriminately guilt-ridden Germans, American neoconservatives, outraged over the Holocaust, and Teutonophobic Brits, who would try to breathe new life into a cadaverous thesis.”

Perhaps, one should add to those these pathetic Internet Team-Russia shills as well.

In another article, after dealing with Neocon Germanophobes, P. Gottfried discusses the recent work of British historian Max Hastings:

“More relevant to my discussion, however, are those who know something about the War but who can’t resist serving us warmed-over platitudes. Someone who fits this category is the distinguished British historian Sir Max Hastings.”… He appropriately goes after the Central Powers, since he knows that “the price of German victory would have been democracy itself.”…

For better or worse, Fischer’s evidence that Germany and Austria were alone responsible for the War has been dying the death of a thousand stabs for decades. In Der Fischer-Komplex, Gunter Spraul notes the sloppiness with which Fischer cites sources, particularly those attributed to the German Kaiser and to Helmut von Moltke, the chief of the German General Staff in 1914. Spraul could have added considerably to his list of Fischer’s misrepresentations and garbled citations, but doing so would take me too far afield.

Great find, thanks.

I found this excerpt to be particularly interesting:

“As young boy, Lyndon watched his politically active grandfather “Big Sam” and father “Little Sam” seek clemency for Leo Frank, the Jewish victim of a blood libel in Atlanta. Frank was lynched by a mob in 1915, and the Ku Klux Klan in Texas threatened to kill the Johnsons. The Johnsons later told friends that Lyndon’s family hid in their cellar while his father and uncles stood guard with shotguns on their porch in case of KKK attacks. Johnson’s speech writer later stated, “Johnson often cited Leo Frank’s lynching as the source of his opposition to both anti-Semitism and isolationism.””

Leo Frank as victim of a blood libel, LOL. As Hitler said, Jews stick together like a clump of burrs. As the Talmud says, and as we are learning from the Rittenhouse trial, it is not illegal for a Jew to rape or kill a goyim.

Exhibition in Italy says VW Beetle design was not Hilter’s. Hitler stole the design from a (((Jew))). Consistency is one trait these shameless (((people))) have.

Article
https://m.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/debatten/architecture-of-speed-wie-hitler-die-idee-fuer-den-kaefer-stahl-17630969.html

I believe that the Rothschilds had all kinds of secret codes for communicating with one another to conduct their far-flung businesses within Europe—Frankfurt, Vienna, Paris, London, Naples—and doubtless beyond.

I expect these encrypted communications also extended to outposts of the British East India Company, where Baghdadi Jews such as the Sassoons monopolized the opium and other sectors and trades that had profound effects on the geopolitics of the day.

It is a fact that many, many terms and names used in contemporary Israeli “public life” are acronyms of one sort or another and have secret meanings that only (some) other Israelis understand.

That is quite apart from gematria. In fact, the Rothschilds were probably using a form of gematria in their inter-office communications.

Secrecy, deception, making another the fall guy, encryption, and all possible forms of misdirection seem to be an integral aspect of Jewish/Yiddish culture.

Ruth Paine had been “a leader in the Jewish community at Indianapolis,” working with Jewish immigrants who “spoke Yiddish …

Thanks for this detail on Ruth Paine, and the article, Laurent.

Jacob Rubenstein, Meyer Lansky, Lyndon Baines Johnson, Mickey Cohen, Benjamin Siegelbaum … even little Ruth Paine doing her duty …

And what of Dallas Police (haha) Officers who accepted favours like corned beef sandwiches (lol) from Rubenstein .. or Chief Justice (haha) Warren, plus the multiplicity of crooked and/or cowardly officials, “journalists” and politicians who have covered up the JFK crime for 60 Years ongoing, plus others from the same source like 9/11.
i.e. those who are sworn to uphold justice, law and righteousness, who are paid handsomely to protect the citizen from people like those above …

What is one to deduce about USA from its rotten-to-the-core officials ?
Maybe that it isn’t really a country, but simply an International Crime Syndicate ?
That it is a Failed Experiment ?
That what looks like its current demise is richly deserved ?

For the origins of WW1, one has to go back to the two Boer Wars – they were orchestrated by the same clique who brought about WW1. Forget about that irrelevant assassination in Sarajevo.

Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War.

A propos, ce link peut t’interesser:

Pourquoi les vaccins nous sont imposés

I would contend that Dutch is a closer dialect to German that Yiddish is. The vast majority of Dutch words have their roots in German, and the rest in English, which one could argue is rooted in German as well. Plus the Dutch are protestants, or better said Christian. Again many of the expressions, thought patterns and word roots come from the bible. As you said, Yiddish has Slavic and Aramaic and who knows what other words and expressions mixed in, and stories and phrases expressed in the Talmud, Torah and by Rabbi’s.

I speak fluent German and often have dinner with Flemish Belgians and Dutch. Often they will forget that we were carrying on a conversation in German and then deviate off into Flemish. I can follow them to a point, but often when the subject deviates into something obscure, I lose track.

But this is not the point anyway. I was referring to Yiddish as an international language of Jews conspiring against goyim, and the case in point was in Dallas Texas where no one speaks German or Yiddish, and the “Yiddish speaking reporters” that Ruby brought into the police station were clearly a ruse anyway. It supports my contention that the Jews were speaking Yiddish not because they couldn’t speak english, but because they were carrying on secret communications that the goyim could not understand. Perhaps they would have faced more difficulty hiding their deceptions in a police station in Amsterdam, but I doubt it.

Obviously you don’t know much about German dialects. Even between Germans, a thick Bavarian, Wurtemberger or Austrian accent can be unintelligable to a northern German, especially to one without experience. Speaking it fluently and without a heavy German accent would not be a possibility for 99% of the Germans that could even understand it decently. And that is the rub, none of those Germans would be experienced with Yiddish, and native German speakers form a minority of Europeans. Besides that, Germans don’t qualify as being international cosmopolitans, and they are not dispersed throughout the top strata of every country across the planet. So I am sorry, Yiddish would qualify as a special Lingua Conspiratoria to Jews discussing things that they did not want the goyim to understand.

The NS fight against Freemasonry was very clear (Gegnerforschung). Hitler mentioned in Mein Kampf that the Masons were one of the groups behind the Great War. This is not only correct, but as Hitler intuited, the Masons had relevance in shaping the League of Nations and the new order. In the midst of the war, a transnational network was formed that sought to establish a new international order based on democratic standards. This included mainly socialists and liberals, but there were also feminists, industrialists, bankers, etc.
Henri La Fontaine (freemason) was a member of the Belgian delegation to the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 and to the League of Nations Assembly, he was also one of the founders of the Central Organization for a Durable Peace (CODP).
https://academic.oup.com/past/article-abstract/249/1/121/5821048?redirectedFrom=fulltext

This anti-Masonic sentiment spread among all the fascist and far-right groups in Europe. In Romania, for example, the Iron Guard was explicitly anti-Semitic and anti-Masonic, also they established the “Societatea‘ Anti-Freemasonica˘ “. In the Spanish Civil War, many Republican Liberals were Freemasons.

Gustav Stresemann was a Freemason, and the National Socialists protested the inclusion of Germany in the League of Nations (and the Young Plan). Guys like Schacht were an exception to the rule, and it certainly didn’t turn out well for them, as Schacht was always a traitor and an accomplice to the City of London and House of Warburg.

https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/bitstream/handle/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2011-08-9993/THOMAS-DISSERTATION.pdf

When the Germans occupied France, they unearthed an incredible amount of archives on Freemasonry, thanks to this they made propaganda films actively condemning these secret groups.
https://research.aston.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/freemasonary-in-france-during-the-nazi-occupation-and-its-rehabil

The SD ended both Freemasonry and occult groups in Germany. I recommend reading Between Occultism and Nazism by Peter Staudenmaier.
https://brill.com/view/title/24927

I find all the mentions of Yiddish to be quite interesting. I seem to be running across this quite a lot lately.

“Jacob Rubenstein belonged to the Jewish mafia, also known as the Yiddish Connection.”

“Mr. GRIFFIN. Do you know if there were Israeli newspaper or Yiddish—

Mr. EBERHARDT. There was a bunch of them running around there talking that unknown tongue. I don’t know what they were saying.”

Nancy Pelosi: ‘My father was a Shabbos Goy’

“Pelosi recounted her father, Thomas D’Alesandro Jr.’s acquaintance with Jewish culture, saying he was a “Shabbos Goy” who “spoke Yiddish””

Was Stalin Jewish, & Does it Matter?

“a further indication that Stalin as Jewish was that one of his long-time friends recommended he attend a Yiddish theatre, and therefore it is assumed Stalin spoke Yiddish”

I find this significant because Jews all across the planet have always had their own special language, unintelligible to the goyim, that they used in their international conspiracies. The importance of Lingua Franca in diplomacy during the age of reason is completely overshadowed by Yiddish as the Lingua Conspiratoria for the last millenia at least.

Christians had the crusades, Muslims have the Jihad. Jews have the Mitzvah.

If this article is true, Ruby’s role was part of the Mitzvah, the holy race war against goyim, especially whites and Arabs.

But me thinks Ruby’s motivations had more to do with mafia affiliation.

“Whatever happens, it is always Russia’s fault.”

This is a classic example of the cognitive dissonance that arises from the Russian and Slavic inability to recognize the true nature of Stalin and the “Russian” communists that destroyed their countries and murdered the carriers of their best genes in a true and modern Talmudic war against Amaleks.

Was it the Russian Army or the Red Army that invaded Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania and Manchuria in the late 1930’s? Was it the Red Army or the Russian Army that raped its way across Eastern Europe? Was it the Russians or Communist Jews that murdered the Kulaks and created the holodomor? Was it Russians or Communist Jews that sent millions to be starved and worked to death in the Gulags?

Someone in a comment above mentioned how the obliteration of the truth about Germany in the two world wars for Israel is haunting all of Europe and causing a civilizational mental disorder. The same applies to Russia and Poland, but in inverse. Germans are not allowed to discuss, think about or consider historical truths, while Russians and Poles hide from them. Of course any knowledgeable person is aware that this demoralization comes straight out the Talmud and the Protocols.

Thank you for bringing this up. Poland as a neighbor was, and still is an unbearable imposition.
It would have been a great favor of Providence to have Poland put next to Washington D.C., London or Paris. Nothing educates better than experience. Poland has taken about one third of German soil in the 20th Century and ethnically cleansed about 20 million East Germans. No year goes by without cries in Poland for reparations from Germany. Who knows anymore where Eastern Germany lies? It has been linguistically eliminated.

I agree with everything you wrote, but I would add that in the case of Rosenfelt (Roosevelt), there was a large dollop of Freemasonry “guiding” his decisions. There is also strong evidence that the entire Roosevelt family were cryto-jews from Holland, home of Europe’s first Judaic Central Bank.

Below the “more” are some images…

[MORE]

The Challenging Years:The autobiography of Stephen Wise by Stephen Samuel Wise

tells us the rise of Wilson-

“ Mr Wilson would run for governor of the state of New Jersey
He wouldn’t complete the term
He would run for the office of the president and win .
He would go on winning a second term “- Rabi Wise said to the attendees at a Jewish congregation .

Mr Wilson was asked to recruit Brandeis who was coopted by the British Zionist . Wilson would support Balfour declaration . Brandeis will bring Frankfurter and establish channels and nodes of power throughout the country whose sole purpose was to make Zionism a bipartisan issue , an issue of church ,labors , and of media .

Incidentally the person who opposed most to the Fed Res in 1913, mysteriously decided to support it after being counseled by various bankers .

“Your great fault, as I said, is to pretend certain connections without connecting the dots.”

One “dot” that you seem to ignore is the fact that the England had long been a virtual Island of Judea going back centuries.

The exact point in time that the British lost sovereignty over their island is hard to put ones finger on, and for the sake of simplicity I will ignore Wales and Scotland. If we start tracing back from today, perhaps we can determine when the take over happened.

Clearly the facade of democatic governance by the English peoples today is a sham. From global-homo to multi-culturalism to over indebted government to the mass invasion of third-worlders to the never ending overseas military adventures to the recent covid lockdowns and vaccine mandates it is undeniable that the country is not being ruled for the benefit of the islands historical inhabitants.

If we start going back in time, say to the 1930’s and 1940’s, with the millions of dead, the loss of empire, the massive debt incurred in the war that achieved nothing for the English, it is undeniable that the country was not being ruled for the benefit of the islands historical inhabitants.

In 1910-20 and the first world war for Israel, once again we have millions of dead, massive debts, destruction of the pound and loss of the gold standard. It is undeniable that the country was not being ruled for the benefit of the islands historical inhabitants.

If we go back to the turn of the previous century, we have the Boer War and other wars in Africa and Asia for property and wealth that were not waged for benefit of the islands historical inhabitants.

What was happening on that island, why were the English continually sacrificing the blood of the English people for “empire”? Was it for the good of the “English”, or even of the “English Aristocracy”?

Undeniably the English wars were being fought for the benefit of the same Judaics who took control of the Bank of England in 1694 after Cromwell invited them back to England. This is when the true origins of the term “Perfidious Albion” took root, and were made famous when ((England)) was meddling in the French Revolution and Napoleonic wars.

With founding of the first European Central Bank, the Bank of Amsterdam, and then the take over of the Bank of England, the Judaic usurers started their ascent to primacy across all of Europe. That take over is complete today.

The Judaic ascent to primacy in the US was finally accomplished in 1913 with the Federal Reserve Act. It was a long struggle, but Judea finally got control of the fountain of free money in the US on the eve of the first world war for Israel, precisely as required.

Andrew “I killed the Bank” Jackson, like Hitler, took back control of the fountain of free money (Bank of the US) from the Jews. Jackson carried lead bullets in his body from one of the many assassination attempts made against him. Jewish Power will stop at nothing to maintain control of the fountain of free money. In 1913 they regained control over the US with the creation of the Fed, the same control they had over the UK.

So when you, Carolyn, claim that:

“Wilson was heavily worked on by the non-Jewish British Foreign Office and Intelligence elites; the Jews did not have the power at that time to force Wilson to do anything. “

you are are in essence claiming that the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve and all the Judaic bankers like the Rothschilds, Warburgs and Baruchs, and all the Jewish run media in the US and the UK, and all the high level Freemasons running around in the “British Foreign Office and Intelligence elites” “did not have the power to force Wilson to do anything”. LOL.

I will close with a hat tip to Milner, Rhodes, the Round Table and all the Masonic societies scheming and conspiring in the shadows of power for centuries. These Masonic lodges had been infiltrated and subsumed by the same Judaic forces that had taken control of central banking. Freemasonry is at its root just kabbalism for goyim, and may famous Freemasons have stated as much. Masonry was for centuries the hidden hand of Jewish Power, and unfortunately the critical role it played in causing all these wars and revolutions on behalf of its judaic benefactors likely will never be revealed. After Hitler liberated France in 1940, much of these Masonic secrets were exposed and made public, and if Hitler had ever succeeded in liberating England undoubtedly the world would finally have learned much of what has really gone on across the planet since 1694. Unfortunately, with the defeat of Germany in 1945, and the ensuing “de-Nazification”, all this true Masonic conspiring has once again become hidden from humanity. This covid Plandemic is just one nasty, but direct, result.

But that is not all, not even close, so let’s continue…

– The polish government, in early winter of 1932, attempted to cause a conflict in Danzig.
– The Polish government in 1936 assured the Western Powers that despite the non-aggression pact then in force, it stood ready for an offensive against Germany.
-In summer of 1938 the Warsaw foreign ministry planned to join the Western Powers in a possible war against Germany.
– The Polish government hid the German proposals about negotiations re Danzig and the German-Polish frontier from France and Britain.

-In early 1939 Poland prepared concentration camps for local Germans.
Poland in early 1939 prepared lists of names of Germans to be marched into concentration camps.
More than 5000 Germans were killed during these marches and the ensuing violence.

– Polish politicians, in the Spring 1939, called for the conquest of German lands up to the Oder-Neisse line. Polish politicians drew up plans for borders to the West of the Oder river and the subsequent partitioning of Eastern parts of today’s Germany.
– Senior Western diplomats were correct that such plans were entertained in the Polish Ministry of Foreign affairs and the foreign minister himself.

– Ethnic cleansings of local Germans were carried out by Poland in late 1938 in the Checkslovak areas recently conquered by Poland.

– A former German chancellor and opponent of the NS regime declared to have seen a British-Polish agreement which in early 1939 promised parts of eastern Germany to Poland in case of war.

– Poland was the first to mobilize her army in 1939.
– Polish officers including the Army chief of staff, planned for a war in the spring 1939 and declared it would be carried out offensively.
– the Polish government on 5th August 39 uttered a threat of war against Germany because of a German letter it had received on the subject of Danzig, which tried peacefully to settle the issue.
The Polish government in late August 39 expressly refused to accept any type of negotiation proposals to settle the Danzig-corridor issue from the German side.

-Excesses against local Germans took place in Poland BEFORE the war broke out in Sep 1 1939, causing the flight of over 76.000 refugees to Germany, plus nearly 20.000 to Danzig.
-Polish troops opened fire at German installations and Polish AA fired upon German civilian airplanes BEFORE Sep 1 1939.
Polish regulars and militias violated the German border BEFORE Sep 1 39. This also took place near Gleiwitz.
Polish soldiers were even told that the goal was to march on Berlin.
The Polish ambassador to Berlin on the morning of 31 August 39 declared that Polish troops would soon march on Berlin.
[Were these people overconfident or what?]

-Members of the Polish governmet in exile even demanded, once again, parts of Eastern Germany after the defeat of 39.
On those occasions they also demanded once more the ethnic cleansing of the local German population.
The Polish politicians had NO illusions of the actual German character of the lands they desired.

“Striving to become a major power was the curse of our political line. … Polish power politics did not relinquish concepts for the separation of the Ukraine and the Caucasus from Russia and carried on with the objective of absorbing Danzig or even East Prussia. Certain activities in this direction which can best be described as walking on eggshells, were for all intents and purposes, undertaken by state agencies or intitutions financed by the national budget. The public was unbeliavably proud of this and very satisfied with the matter.”
Michał Łubieński, Cabinet Chief of the Polish Foreign Minister.

Source: Polen 1939: Kriegskalkül, Vorbereitung, Vollzug.
von Stefan Scheil.

Great comment L.K. Polish actions towards ethnic Germans after the wars end in 1945 also reveal the true nature of Polish Nationalism, as did much of their terrorist activities during the war.

The fact that Poland never really resisted the Soviet invasion in 1939, and the fact that the Polish Home Army (AK) only fought the Germans when the Red Army again invaded Poland in 1944, despite the revelations of Katyn Forest and the assassination of Sikorsky, also highlights the true anti-German nature of Polish/Slavic nationalism.

On the eve of the war, Poland also made land grabs in Lemberg, Galicia and even invaded Czecho-slovakia in September 1938. The area around Bohumin, like Lemberg, certainly did not have Polish majorities.

I’ll cite you Helfferich: (Der Ausbruch des Weltkriegs, Vol. 1, p. 127)
“In der Tat haben russische Truppen und Banden die ostpreußische Grenze bereits vor Ablauf der von uns am 31. Juli gestellten Frist und vor der Überreichung unserer Kriegserklärung überschritten und damit den Kriegszustand herbeigeführt.”

In English with my translation:
Indeed, Russian troops and irregular bands had already crossed the border in East-Prussia before the time given /ultimatum (to suspend the General Russian Mobilization) of 31st July (1914) and before the Declaration of War had been handed over and (therefore) established the state of war.”

I have, as in the German original from helfferich, left everything in the one sentence. To avoid any confusion: Helfferich says that Russian military and irregulars had already crossed over the border into East Prussia at a time when the time accorded to Russia to cancel its General Mobilization Order, and thus to remove the immediate threat of an attack on Germany, had not yet passed and before Germany handed over a declaration of war to Russia.

“Did a Schiff, Warburg, Belmont or Rothschild attend? Do you know? They may have paid for it. Why not? Does that mean it had any influence or made any impression on the world powers at that time?”

The Revenue Act (Income Tax) and the Federal Reserve Act both were passed in late 1913 on the eve of the first world war for Israel. Your interpretation of history clearly does not agree with mine. Let us agree to disagree.

Yes, Jews were promoting the war on all sides and through all their puppet Masonic lodges too. Of course they also financed all sides as well.

But it is important to recognize that just as those jews overthrew and murdered the Tsar, they also stabbed the Kaiser, and all of Germany, in the back. Meanwhile, England was willing to give Palestine to the Jews which the Germans would not due to their alliance with Turkey, who were busy genociding the Armenians under commond of the Dolmor Jews on behalf of Judea.

On all sides we see the Jews manipulating, corrupting and enriching themselves. Century after century and it continues today. Bourla and Pfizer being prime examples.