Long hair was mainstream in the early 70s, as a lot of photos and ads from the era will show. It was cooler to be shorter haired by the late-70s. By the 90s nobody cared much one way or the other..
https://centerforaninformedamerica.com/inside-the-lc-the-strange-but-mostly-true-story-of-laurel-canyon-and-the-birth-of-the-hippie-generation-part-i/
Frank’s dad Francis Zappa was, in case you were wondering, a chemical warfare specialist assigned to Edgewood Arsenal, the longtime home of America’s chemical warfare program, as well as a facility frequently cited as being deeply enmeshed in MK-ULTRA operations ... Francis Zappa continued to busy himself with doing classified work for the military/intelligence complex.
Frank Zappa [the musician his son] was, by numerous accounts, a rigidly authoritarian control-freak and a supporter of U.S. military actions in Southeast Asia. Frank Zappa never really made a secret of the fact that he had nothing but contempt for the ‘hippie’ culture that he helped create and that he surrounded himself with.
Thank god somebody else knows where these people came from. Who knows if they even wrote their own stuff. They were part of the Laurel Canyon (U.S.) and Tavistock (U.K.) agenda. Public mind control experiments. Zappa grew up in bio-weapons territory.
This is a perfect reason why the use of “conservative” and “liberal” make no sense. Left and right make more sense. Ultra-liberal, leftist places like Oregon and Washington state actually have very high obesity rates, especially among women.
They are not doing it for blacks. Most are paid mercenaries. Probably using some kind of drug. Maybe get extra for taking down statues–goes on the resume. Even the blacks were bussed in from elsewhere, most of them.
Everybody who was anybody in Chicago knew Obama was gay. And “Michele” was Michael. Even outside Chicago. But people on this site really seem to believe the MSM to an amazing degree.
There will be no WWIII. Trump is not there to what the globalists have been trying to do for years.
He pulls troops out of the ME and gets criticized. The only reason the NYT and WaPo are hollering at Trump, is that he took one day to do what they would prefer be dragged out in years, causing many more American and Iraqi deaths, (and would bring more profit to the real war-makers–the bankers and corporations. Who cares about the soldiers, forced to join the military because the industrial bases was sold to the highest non-American bidders. The MSM media. They are our greatest enemies and the most despicable.
WWIII on the way yet again, Trump’s fault of course. We just had a WWIII on the way with North Korea. No more. Then with missiles to Syria. No more. The Syrians celebrated when Solemani was killed. So did many, many Iranians off the books (check outside the MSM). Rouhani sure didn’t like him.
Solemani was a terrorist responsible for the death and mutilation of thousands of Iraqis and American soldiers. He was likely a CIA asset which is undoubtedly why the lamentations from the many pundits in places like the WaPo, NYT, Bloomberg, MSNBC, etc. You know, that entity known as the MSM owned by about 5 entities with closely connected interests.
What I don’t get is why they are so on the side of the “murdered” terrorist. I do declare, there is more sympathy for him than they ever have for American killed by illegals, or Americans killed anywhere. Surely more than for the Americans killed at Benghazi, which Solemani helped set up.
By their cries and lamentations you shall know them. The lamentations on this site are surprising and ludicrous, knowing as we do the extent to which the press lies and misrepresents. You are closer to the truth when you assume the opposite of what the NYT says. I’m beginning to think that about this place.
I was smiling at that too. As JessetheGreen points out, even the conclusion of the U.S. Congress in 1978 was “likely conspiracy.” Whether Congress did or not admit that, common sense, endless research, and the visceral feelings of those alive at that time, lets one know it’s not just likely. It’s definite.
There’s a reason “conspiracy” and “theory” are so often printed together since the late 60s.
Ancient Egyptians were Black Africans from Nubia (Northern Sudan).They represented themselves with dark brown skin and braided hair, and that includes their Pharaohs. Below is a statue representing Tutankhamun:http://www.shenoc.com/toutankhamon%208.jpgHere are Nefertiti and Akhenaton (Louvre museum):https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3d/Akhenathon_and_Nefertiti_E15593_mp3h8771-gradient.jpg/600px-Akhenathon_and_Nefertiti_E15593_mp3h8771-gradient.jpg
And to what race did those Egyptian Africans belong?
I’ve looked at hundreds of ancient Egyptian portraits. The paintings are ambiguous. The 3-D ones (carvings in stone for example) are a mixed bag. There are those who obviously have sub-Saharan African looks, but most do not. I could cherry pick some very white looking examples, as you have the black looking ones. But really they look like — Egyptians. They don’t look like anybody else really, but they lean more towards a typical middle-eastern sort of Caucasoid type.. In fact, they look much like they do now. If you go to Egypt you will see. The northern part of the country has persons very white looking by north African standards, while the southern part has more black African looks. Just what you’d expect. And Egyptians did differentiate between the black Nubians and themselves by color, as they differentiated between themselves and the light Hittites, by color among other traits.
Genetically, whites are a lot closer to blacks than to East Asians,
You kind of remind me of Democrat high-level pols. Their untrue statements are getting mind-blindingly blatant.
Black Africans are vastly more genetically removed from Whites than Whites are from east Asians ; what is more interesting and less expected is, that Africans are also genetically removed (vastly) from the people of India, even those Indians who are very dark.. Too bad Razib Khan isn’t around anymore to elaborate.
I grew up in Baltimore. My parents’ generation who were adults during the 30s-50s, said there was no problem walking around at night in Baltimore. It was all pretty nice. Then the mid-60s hit. I remember reading in Life Magazine about the shocking crime (mid-60s) that suddenly made the cities dangerous, as if it were a sort of biological plague that inexplicably invaded. Most well-meaning people were forced to believe it was just “poverty” even though, when the demographics were different, similar poverty didn’t have quite that pervasive effect. Something about the 60s annihilated the cities.
Something about the 60s annihilated the country. And it's now annihilating all the other (white) countries, one by one.
Something about the 60s annihilated the cities.
Your views are frankly irrelevant and aren't upheld by able White students that get into elite institutions. As an example, 99% of Harvard students said they voted for Hillary Clinton. The same is true for MIT, Caltech, Stanford, Yale, Berkeley, Brown, the various liberal arts colleges, and so on. Those affected by affirmative action and end up in, say, Amherst as opposed to Harvard because of it, do not share your views. All across the country liberal White students are the ones in support of these policies even when it affects them.
I’m white and a White Nationalist — while I won’t defend discrimination, my sympathy lies with white students (especially in CA, where they are now significantly under-represented at UC, an institution created by Whites), white people, and white countries.
It’s off topic, but JC — 99% voted for HRC? I am baffled by anyone who counts intelligence by such an act. Not that you do, whoever you are. But geez.
These people conform to each other and to the givers of grant money and jobs. Graduates of “elite” schools expect to be part of certain networks and do what it takes to increase their money and status from an already high catapult. These schools are like sling-shots. Some lucky alumni even go into political positions upper middle class and emerge as billionaires. They’re smart all right.
Anyone with brains knows HRC and WJC are rot. Even my uber-liberal friend working for an “aid agency” in 2010 admitted the money donated to Haiti during the earthquake had disappeared and she alluded to the “Clinton Foundation” but would not elaborate. During the 90s and early 2000s, even the WaPo and NYT admitted, their crimes are legendary in Arkansas, not to mention D.C. Nothing to do with Pol Parties. I’m Independent. The Bushes are rot too. But then the good newspapers got a grip on themselves and realized it is all “conspiracy theory”. After all only the truth got us into things like the Vietnam War. God people are stupid and easily manipulated, and the ones who identify with the kind who graduated from places like Harvard, act the most stupidly because they feel the most invulnerable.
I would love to to go to a female doctor and I have been sexing down beautiful adult women since I was an 11 year old young man.
I see. Well, you seem to have gotten on with your life…but social services should have been informed. I will tell my nephew to beware of such situations.
We didn’t have anything resembling a gyno for most of our history and we don’t need them, either. Especially with our entitlements crisis.
We also didn’t have proctologists but they seem to earn their keep now. However, we did most certainly have something resembling a gyno. They were called midwives and the ones in what is now Germany, Switzerland and Austria, knew enough about herbal remedies that Paraclesus gave them credit for teaching him a thing or two.
Medicine is just the touchiest field.
When I was in highschool, before the days when female doctors were common, the girls in my class tried to find female gynecologists. I mean — you get that right? You were a teenage boy once. You wouldn’t have wanted to go a lady doctor for an intimate exam, right? At least I don’t think so.
Not all female doctors are good and I personally don’t care about the sex much, as far as my GP; but medical school should be according to merit.
‘The Wicker Man’ (2006). You will never look at women the same, and you will certainly never place them on any kind of pedestal ever again.
Man, you really resent that straw pedestal with that straw-woman on it. So a D remake of a 70s B movie caused you to never look on women in the same way? Sounds very — feminist — of you. Check out Mark of the Devil (B+), German movie from the 70s, famous for its tongue extraction scene that caused screams to reverberate through the drive-ins. 80% of the 150,000 or so of those burned or otherwise tortured and executed as witches between 1500-1680, were women. Too bad they didn’t the current crop of Democrats have no such fears. But I digress. Back to the drive-in. I’m sure a girl or two never looked at men the same way after that movie; but most of us got over it, because, after all, it made the 20th century look good, and men did lots of great things too. Like make movies. So you gotta take context into consideration, look at the bigger picture.
These media productions have a lot to answer for though. Maybe the conspiracy theories are right about the media. Your example and your apparent wide-eyed, gullibility, are certainly evidence. But, as my old boyfriend would say when he told a gross joke, it’s just a joke. It’s not real. You got no sense of humor?
Condoms are not taxed–at least I don’t think so. How about Viagra? You don’t need to be an SJW to see these “female” products should not be taxed because they are in the medical necessity area. The taxers counted on the embarrassment factor probably. But with the Federal Reserve stealing tax-payers’ money for 100 years, the taxers are experts in theft. Tax payers are cowed. Necessary medical products are not taxed normally. Why would these products be? A woman buys this stuff for 40 years or so. The taxes paid would be considerable. If she put those taxes in a piggy bank, it would be better than a 401K.
Divide and conquer what has till now not been divided. That’s what the MSM does, as ordered.
All shows had separate beds for married couples. It was a tv convention. Lucy and Desi were never seen as an interracial couple. Just the idea was hilarious to me (I grew up watching I Love Lucy) when I first heard it years ago. None of us ever thought of Desi Arnaz as anything other than — Cuban. A bit exotic but would have blended easily enough into Fred, Ethel and Lucy-land if he didn’t have an accent. I remember as a kid noting the black train porter in one episode as being the only “colored” person to appear in the whole series. Actually I think there was a black person waiting for the subway in another episode. Desi didn’t stand out for being a different “race.” He stood out for his exaggerated accent, comical hot temper, and flamboyant floor show down at the Copa Cabana.
Sampling error? In Stalin’s time, how many married women were sent to the camps whose husbands remained free? Not many, I’d have thought.
Actually I’ve read the same said about women in prison in the U.S., modern times, and there are thousands of examples there. The men they were associated with, boyfriends, husbands, etc., don’t visit them, generally. Women do visit men in prison. Don’t know for how long that goes on though.
For some reason the mother of the Bronte authors, Maria Branwell, came to my mind. She married at twenty-nine (the average age of marriage in the UK at that time was about 23) and mother of 6 before dying at 35 or so. I read a lot of biographies; biographies of authors are often more interesting than what they write. Fertility may decline gradually starting at some age around 30, but it doesn’t suddenly plunge. That happens after 40. Even after that, some more or less normal persons have been produced, such as my younger brother and sister.
I’d forgotten the last line. Now I remember why. Leaves a vile taste. It’s public knowledge that Kidman’s father was about to be arrested for pedophilia when he suddenly died, supposedly. Kidman herself was likely involved as a child. What can you say? It’s how she was raised.
Good for Ed.
Ironically, Said had the IQ and cultural sophistication to devise complex-sounding and thus hugely influential justifications for his basically redneck and wholesome emotion: Don’t come around here no more.
Well that’s clear and to the point. Expresses my subterranean impression. That has to be why the TPTB promote it so much in the last 60 years or so.
Oswald said he was a “patsy” and had admired president Kennedy. He was trying to reach legal counsel and was prevented. He was murdered before he could testify. His widow later, despite feeling she would be murdered herself, claimed he did not kill JFK and had never killed anybody. Oswald’s girlfriend (well, he was no saint), a cancer research student he met in 1963 in New Orleans, tells the story convincingly. Ignore the detractors–she tells only what she knows and when you have read her story, you will think differently.
Another person to read is Christopher Fulton, The Inheritance. It’s about the Cartier watch JFK was wearing at the time of the assassination, and the mercury that adhered to it. For years the CIA was trying to get hold of it and JFK’s secretary, Evelyn Lincoln, had been given it by RFK. It ended up in Fulton’s hands and he put it up for auction, the buyer finally being JFK Jr., who went down a year and half later. Fulton ended up in federal prison for 8 years on trumped up tax evasion charges. The Inheritance makes a great deal of that tragedy make sense. The Mossad may have been involved–many such groups were. But many others had even more reason to kill JFK.
You believe Othello was Black? Well, that’s what propaganda does to you. Othello was a Moor, meaning a Muslim from North Africa. Those were White or Beduin or Arab. North Africa has never been Black
Actually the description in Shakespeare does imply negroid features. That’s what made the marriage scandalous. At lest this is what I recall from a textbook discussion written by reasonably non-pc scholars decades ago. In medieval and later Europe, here was no overwhelming aversion to marriage with Levantine/Arab/middle eastern types. The religion was the problem, more than the ethnicity, unless the Arabs were Christians. Black Africans, however, were another matter.
Mohammed claimed blacks would become white in Paradise, because he was speaking in metaphor. White meant radiant, free of earthly dross. It meant that the spirit of the white and black would be of the same hue, depending on their virtues. This was their belief. Most religious teachings started as simple narratives from everyday life (in Christianity they’re called parables), used to represent the spiritual reality. That said, there was a preference for lighter skin throughout Asia.
Trump banned Epstein from his own island after Epstein assaulted the 14 yr old daughter of an employee; Trump also brought testified against Epstein by going to the police himself in 2010. The police publicly commented on that. He was not friends with Epstein, and even any “chummy” acquaintance would not have extended beyond 20o3. The only time he had any flights with an Epstein was catching a ride from Florida to NY with Epstein’s son. It is inevitable that the very rich in NYC, meet and sometimes appear to be “chummy.” But pedos have been arrested in huge numbers since 2017 and assets of known human traffickers were seized in December 2017 causing about 1000 resignations of many CEOs.
Indeed, this is probably a brilliant strategy. All the Trump haters will tune in to see the non-existent connection of Trump and Epstein, just as they tuned in for the non-existent meddling of the Russian’s on Trump’s behalf in 2016. They keep trying. And in the act, they see who the real villains are. Someday people will look back and wonder at how so many could miss what was really happening right under the noses.
What do you mean by the “kennedy’s”
The “kennedy’s” were not a monolith. JFK was dead by the time the immigration law you’re talking about, went through. That was younger brother Ted, who was mainly interested in getting young Irish au pairs in more easily. RFK had next to nothing to do with it. JFK’s ideas concerning immigration were pretty sensible, and probably acceptable to a lot of Trump supporters today.
People who think Trump is stupid, are very, very stupid. I think the North Koreans know that; the Brits know it; the Saudis know it; the Chinese know it (they are now famous for saying that they couldn’t believe America let them get away with what they did and didn’t blame Trump at all for his policies.) The Iranians know it. They just wanted to keep the money Obama gave them. Weird how anybody still believes the mainstream news, even people who should know better. These are hilarious times. But then these same people thought Obama was smart in spite of his hidden scholastic records and inability to speak with out a teleprompter.
*returned
The Iranians know it. They just wanted to keep the money Obama gave them
There’s always a troll who claims this. He looks like Jackie, coloring, sharp browline and forehead, more subdued upper palate and teeth, sharper chin. Looks like JFK Sr. Same jawline, hooded eyes, slant to the outer eyelid, cheekbones and head form, to mention the hauir. Jackie’s hair was thin and curly. JFK Jr. as a child bore a striking resemblance to JFK Sr. at the same age. A picture of two years old John Jr. from the back, watching his dad’s helicopter come in , shows a hair whorl and head shape exactly like JFK Sr. People who actually were in the presence of the father and then the son, always remarked on the similarity of body type, general resemblance, and speech.
I’ve noticed most threads dealing with this topic, at least one troll shows up and says things in much the same way from thread to thread.
One way to weaken the Kennedy allure and regret for having missed it, is to claim it is not even theirs. Truly contemptible. JFK knew the enemies he was up against, how unspeakably diabolical and unrelenting they were.
We’ve seen a number of comments attesting to that.
I would recommend “The Inheritance” by Christopher Fulton. The man spent ten years in various prinsons including federal for no clear reason except that he came into the possession (orignally frm Evelyn Lincoln) of the watch JFK wore on the day of the assassination. Mercury specks were in it, proving the gun had to have been one that shot such bullets. JFK Jr. bought the watch. While Christopher Fulton was in prison, someone predicted to him that the ‘son” might go down soon because he knew too much and could move into a powerful position.
Of course he was murdered. That’s as plain as day.
Obwandiyag. Don’t see your point. The commenters are describing what we have been living through in American cities for the past 80 years. Some of us came to the scene later than others but the story is the same. Baltimore’s row houses had white marble steps and in the first half of the 20th century, these were scrubbed white every week by working class (during the Depression, often unemployed) every week. As far as white gangs, yeah, they were around. Plenty of them and they did damage. But they did not turn entire cities in what look like post-World War zones. Vast areas of D.C. and Baltimore, the two cities with which I am most familiar, looked like they had just been annihilated. Describing reality is dreary and repetitive, but it is not “stupid” just because you don’t want us to know it.
His greatest accomplishment is that he saved us from Hillary Clinton. Clinton and her death lists; Obama and his treason and contempt for Americans, the uranium sales, the treason against the Americans who tried to protect the embassy at Benghazzi. It goes on and on. Even the MSM used to write often about Clinton crimes until it was bought up by fewer and fewer people.
How can you so deride a man who standing up against such creatures? Right in my county a witness scheduled to testify against the Clinton Foundation the next day, died in double “suicide” and house ablaze. They’re getting lazy. Same thing happened earlier in the year.If you have to ask what Trump’s great accomplishments are, and make up silly insult names for him, that tells me you are not objective and that the Clinton Foundation still has long tentacles. The fact that HRC and Obama hated him so much and it was so obvious (the Bushes and Clintons were friends, always obvious) was enough evidence for me that Trump is their antithesis.
These people on this thread who act like Trump no different — don’t get them. Very weird.
Correct (as I said at #20). But today I learned that the Black Hebrew Mother-Forkers (great turn of phrase!) are a fixture in downtown DC, assailing the public daily at the Chinatown Metro station. Furthermore, that small band of lunatics once ventured to their divine land, Israel, from whence they were quickly, summarily ejected. There are other raving goofballs on the streets of the Swamp, but these guys must be the most colorful.
Tucker Carlson ..... did not utter the dread B word.
I'd be remiss to not take this chance to sick you on Bernard-Henri Levy, arch enemy of peace and sanity. He deserves your informed eloquence. (Is there a dress code at the Commonwealth Club?) You may run into Cloak and Dagger there, if he can trust you not to dox him. :)
If I had been there I would have asked him....
“but these guys must be the most colorful.”
I can’t look at them more than a second so I don’t know for sure, but they are definitely the loudest. Deafening. Public nuisance. I mean, isn’t disturbing the peace against the law?
Oswald was not mind controlled. He was clear headed enough to know he was a patsy and declared himself as such. Sirhan Sirhan definitely was and there are references in his notebooks to a “hypnotists” although it was a little more complicated than that, I think. Especially when he kept saying in a trance-like voice, “I need coffee, I just want coffee.”
It’d have to be about 3,000 miles long and would have to go through near wilderness in the northwest states, no? Too much trouble for too little. Canadians are not streaming forth anyway. I don’t think they tend to become welfare benefiters.
What!? Fluoride is a by-product of the aluminum industry which figured out how to make money on a poison. I have read it was used in concentration camps during WWII to keep prisoners docile. I dont know how often that was done, but some prisoners remembered the water they drank was blue. European countries outlawed fluoride.
In what alt-left-right-center universe is he a fraud? He has been attacked relentlessly like no other president I have ever known of. He has been targeted for assassination so many times, if attempts were darts, he’d be a sieve. “Comedians” parade around with his paper-mache bloody head and expect to be admired for it. If he walked on water, the MSM would report “Trump can’t swim.”
He lowers taxes, improves prospects for small business, brings industry back to this country after we were sold out–or at least he tries to bring it back. At least he advocates for the citizens here, and not the rest of the world first. He negotiated nuclear war imminence out of NK (how quickly anti-Trumpers forget if they are forced to acknowledge it at all.) He has commenced the wall, and a vet who lost 3 limbs, Kolfage, has raised over 20 million to build the wall last I saw, to build the wall. No president’s policies in the past 50 years, have actually inspired people to feel positively about this country.
And you think he is some kind of fraud? What is your definition of someone trying to do the job he was elected for?
Replies: @Cloak And Dagger
@Martin_Indyk
Trump: “We give Israel billions of dollars, they'll be okay.” This cavalier attitude is deeply worrying. Ignores the role of US as force multiplier for Israeli deterrence. From here it’s a short step to Trump asking: why are we giving Israel so much money?
https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium-trump-on-syria-withdrawal-we-give-israel-billions-of-dollars-they-ll-be-ok-1.6785878
blame some vast conspiracy for your personal failures. It’s pathetic.
They are usually blaming pervasive cultural failures on a vast conspiracy, not personal problems. My personal life, for example, is A-ok just now, but I see what’s happening around me and I absolutely know that many people have “conspired” — etymology, communicated so closely and quietly that they seemed to breath together — to create these situations. I mean, why are you even still acting as if conspiracy is some mysterious myth. Everyone knows it now. They are just not allowed to acknowledge it publicly. “They” have done their job well in that area.
They don’t have any appreciable Arab genes, although the Jewish population was large. Maybe that’s what it is. Nor are most most white Americans partly native American or black.
JS is playing fast and loose with everybody else’s ancestry, assuming more mixed-upness than is really the case, as do people who have no strong ethnic or cultural identity or who want to bond with others for being mixed. Not surprising.
I know any number of unmarried white women who voted for Trump, in a blue state. Let go of the stereotypes. They are promoted by the MSM. Trump’s supporters are diverse, and becoming moreso. Diverse is just a neutral descriptor, btw.
The Constitution is not a fairy tale. Don’t be so goofy. You can even go to Washington, D.C. and see the original. As I said, it’s the best up to that time, but it is not inclusive. Edit a few paragraphs and you have democracy as we think we know it. You would never study the Constitution? Neither would most of the law makers who have slimed their way into places of power in the past 30 years. I think Clinton blew his nose on it, Bush drew cartoons on it, and Obama wiped his ass on it (they told me in private.) HRC wanted to wrap it around anthrax. The current potus has at least read it.
btw, I have never known of a Slav being so concerned about ante-bellum slavery.
Why would the CIA have wanted to go after Hefner?
Probably all kinds of reasons best know by themselves. The CIA was involved in the social engineering experiments and used sexy women for any number of activities. I was never interested enough in Steinem to investigate deeply, but she was a staged act, as were so many of those apparently spontaneous manifestations of societal change during the mid-60s.
Capitalism was never about being "equal" man, what's wrong with you. How can you buy that propaganda nonsense. Did someone publish a capitalist manifesto that I wasn't aware of, where everybody was declared "equal"?
The idea was that all people are equal in ‘rights’.
Did someone publish a capitalist manifesto that I wasn’t aware of, where everybody was declared “equal”?
you’re not aware of the U.S. Constitution? They used to make you study that to become a citizen, but they may be slipping these days. It was not totally inclusive but as far as it went, it was explicit.
Jewish feminists like Steinem sure went after his ass…
Steinem was working for the CIA. That’s been out for years. CIA recruits heavily from Georgetown University, Catholic place, though I’m sure Steinem didn’t go there. I didn’t take it seriously until I saw it happen before my eyes. An amazing number of people in the CIA and other agencies that work in the dark, went to Georgetown.
I doubt you are a Slav.
I agree. Cringe-worthy is the word. Doesn’t get the culture he’s pretending at all.
I grew up in a city full of white ethnic neighborhoods still in tact in the late 20th century, more or less, and one of them was Polish/Lithuanian. Now this was a divided city, once segregated. Nobody considered Poles and Liths — even Italians and Greeks — as anything other than white, though I did know a Greek guy who got teased during the summer when he came back from the beach.
Not one Pole or Lith, not one Czeck, Slovak, or Ukrainian, would identify as anything other than white. In fact, they seemed a lot more openly and bitterly bigoted than non-east European ethnics, if only because in their city dwellings, they were often surrounded by blacks, and victimized by crimes. I think it may also have been where they came from but I don’t know. They were some of the most bigoted people I ever met and it had nothing to do with “Anglo-Saxon” attitudes. In my town, it was the Irish who reacted toAnglo-Saxon contempt, not the Slavs.
Noam Chomssky still believes the official story of 9/11 which proves that the “great intellect” isn’t more than a buffoon.
He’s also on record as saying he doesn’t know or care who killed JFK (and probably others assasisnated if that’s his attitude.) For someone in his field, making sense of society and the world through language and commuication, that is an absurd thing to say, and told me all I need to know about him and the agenda. I wondered why 20 years ago. Now it’s all clear. And anybody who uses the phrase “conspiracy theory” without irony, is comfortable with lies.
.
Frankly, I never understood the appeal of U2
Now they are a joke. The music is crap. They look ridiculous prancing around like they are cool rock stars. Rather like a middle-aged woman carrying on like she still has sexual power
.
So they are rather elderly men carrying on like they still have sexual power? I see. I’ve been chuckling at the Rolling Stones for about 3 decades now, but at least they can be entertaining to some. If you remember the young Stones it’s surreal.
Actually Bono is not really Irish. Not if you look at his background. He’s atypical. He’s also paid by the same “elite” who pay the Hollywood creatures to spew their swill.
Germany, Norway, Sweden, Czech Republic, etc etc have no problems providing free university education to its citizens?
Because these countries have been filled mostly with their own people. They understand the abilities and behavior of those people from long years of history, and know who will be using the system and for what ends. Some also use a filtering system around the age of 12 and put kids on a certain school track, college bound or not. You wouldn’t want that, would you? And they were fairly prosperous. The United States is full of all kinds of people who streamed in here from god knows where, many just to game the system. And damned if my tax money is going to pay for their college education when I, and many like me, ordinary middle class people, had to work our way through school. Sometimes I think most college is scam. I just don’t want to be double scammed, paying for other peoples’ college education.
I have found these “studies” tiresome, goofy, and divisive, for a long time now… but “library science” in that list of the un-needed “studies?” The library world is certainly changing. However, since the 1980s, library courses are heavily computer oriented and those with the inclination, became programmers of some sort and their professional can get quite “technical” so to speak. The earliest forms of confederated search engines were developed in libraries in the 1970s, years before the internet became public. A good library/librarian benefits staff in organizations, and in academia. The better students and staff are the ones who tend to avail themselves of the benefits, although I sat in a meeting where one IT guy bragged of working for Apple and not entering a library since high school. He looked like Eric Schmidt’s brother, and was in his 40s. He was one of the cheerleaders for decimation of informative paper products.
In any case, there has been a wholesale assault on libraries, mostly by “liberals,” turning the public ones into recreational facilities and unofficial day care centers, when there are people who go there for peace, quiet, and reading. The agency libraries meanwhile, are being deliberately decimated of print material. Some of this is necessary, but irreplaceable print books and other documents, are being thrown out by the bin-load to the shock and dismay of economists and scientists who catch the libraries in the act. And don’t drink the cool-aid that all this information is “on-line.” It’s not. Copyright, expense, lack of ability to access, not everyone wants a long book on-line. Furthermore, don’t overlook the fact that digital works can be messed with. What is writ on paper, is writ. What is writ by the digital is easily messed with, and has been according to some authors.
An article by a Canadian government worker in 2012 noted the relentless bibliocide in government libraries, and how it seemed to be promoted by the same “liberals” who are working so hard to liberalize everything while supposedly making information available to all. Only, it appears, government approved information.
Also the black Ibo people of Nigeria are SMARTER than many of EURO-WHITES.
Many? What is “many”? What kind of “EURO-WHITES?” Albanians? the Irish kind? Nebraskans? These Ibos, Will they make Baltimore great again??
My parents and grandparents could walk the streets of Baltimore safely at night back in the 50s.
btw, don’t you bellow into a loudspeaker at the Gallery Place Metro Stop in D.C. for hours on end?
Sex is cruel. We descended from our common ancestor with the chimpanzee about six or seven million years ago. Chimps are not nice. Gorillas are peaceable but chimps are nasty, violent and treacherous. Male chimps often beat the females before and doing sex. As it happens females who have been beaten thereby exhibit greater fertility.
Sounds like someone who might enjoy the adrenochrome plantation. Apparently the Cool People Who Drive the PTB, are into adrenal fluid drained from the cortex of a tortured and terrified person gives a great high and doesn’t actually depend on sex. Urban legend schmended maybe, but who couldda thunk it up? On topic, Koreans used to be dogs to death because it made the meat taste better. We’re still in strange days.
In any case, did you check with Jane Goodall? I don’t recall that nugget. Sure you didn’t fantasize it? Wife beating was distinctly declasse in most of European history, and an English woman could shame a husband in the public view for that, even in the early 18th century, according to a famous novel I once read, maybe by Defoe but not sure. Either sex is capable of sadism. But it is usually a bad idea. The idea that beaten women are more fertile is so bizar and so conducive of producing more psychopaths and violent thugs that….well, maybe you just described some cultures.
It’s something we should evolve away from and not all animals exhibit that behavior anyway. Who needs more children brought up with all that.
Civilizations with a literature have produced vast compendiums on the arts of love and sex. It’s what’s called civilization and being human. We are not animals. That is a component of our nature, but we can go farther. It seems that some people muse with nostalgia on the worst we can be.
TW, post-surgery, cross-country Sinatra impregnating Mia Farrow as she’s filming a movie with Woody in New York in March 1987 would be quite a feat.
Why? They had airplanes way back then. The resemblance to Sinatra is unmistakable. I always knew he wasn’t quite a Mia clone but I didn’t see Woody there.
Every one of these totally disgusting replies by self hater, self loathing whites is so thick with it, it is close to unreal eh…..Arise as if on que, to defend African savage, sub human animalistic
Probably it hides their fear. If they treat it almost dismissively, it’ll just go away. Then too, they concentrate, as we all must in day to day life at the office, on those blacks who are just normal or decent people. Plenty of them too. It’s just that humans must pay more attention to dangerous signals. It’s a survival function.
Just offhand I could think of 12 people.. Almost every white person in my more or less middle class line up of friends and acquaintances has been themselves, or knows someone, or is related to someone, who was robbed, raped (sister of friend when she was a teen, also he tried to kill her), assaulted, murdered (father of a friend), beaten up (lots, some killed) or otherwise badly interfered with, by blacks. The white on black harassment and crime is much less. And as for historic crime, give us the stats please. White on black rape is extremely rare, so rare that it seems strange it suddenly just stopped because blacks got their rights. If one middle class person who lives in an average area of a large metropolis, as did the aforementioned victims, can come up with that number … yes. We are indeed surrounded by potential predators and the only reason there are not way more murders of whites is because we try so hard (and discretely if we are “liberals”) to keep away from most blacks.
Probably not just Jews; people (probably) have a distinctly lower (negative) opinion of a male converting to his wife's religion than a woman converting to her husband's. The reason is not immediately clear to me. Ideas?Replies: @dcite, @JMcG
Sorry, Putnam but you’re a putz
people (probably) have a distinctly lower (negative) opinion of a male converting to his wife’s religion than a woman converting to her husband’s.
Actually the opposite has often been true, at least in Western countries since the 18th, or maybe 19th centuries. Partly because religion had begun to be seen as a business occupying mainly women, most intensely. This was not so much the case in previous centuries. I’ve come across many examples of this attitude reading biographies and histories of persons living from the late 18th to 20th centuries. Religion was just not taken as seriously by men, or maybe the differences were taken less seriously, and children tended to be raised in the mother’s religion. Men would convert (or not, didn’t make much difference) for family unity, more than out of doctrinal conviction.
Experiment means something new. They’ve been trying that disruptive voodoo for 60 years. It never works. Isn’t that the definition of insanity?
There was an earlier name for them. Creoles. They were often rich and privileged and sought for marriages with the European upper classes
Creole has come to have different meanings, but the original meaning just meant “born in the New World,” in a French or Spanish speaking area, of European lineage. Corresponds to the English word “cradle” though I don’t know the more complex etymology. “Rich and privileged” is a comparative term, and only a few were, and only by comparison with the mass of “POCs.” “Yellow Jack,” part of a famous French descended Creole family, owned many acres of the coast of Alabama, and entertained Andrew Jackson during the War of 1812. But most were of modest means. Mixed race marriages were illegal in the Gulf area during French and American rule, though they could occur during Spanish rule. Anyway, white creole women were famous for only wanting to marry European-born men (of European parentage.) This left many white men of the Gulf area (who were also creoles) without wives and led, of course, to “arrangements” with mixed-race or black women. But I don’t think the Europeans en masse, were ever beating the shores of the Gulf Coast, looking for non-white spouses. Inevitably, among the well traveled, it happened now and then.
The MSM is lies and circuses, in the employ of those in power. They say what they are freakin’ paid to say. That explains Milbank. I was at a press conference he attended, on a controversial subject. His coverage of the event was so different from what actually transpired there, I was actually surprised. Different in the sense that he went with the Official Narrative, the kind of narrative that makes my eyes glaze over at the very thought of watching most tv, or reading MSM coverage of almost anything I care about. Milbank probably attends weird parties where the elite mock their readers.
As for musings about that phony Obama “family,” has no one seen the pictures of Martin Nesbitt and Dr. Anita Blanchard, old friends of the Obama’s? Those are the parents. Modesty prevents me from detailing why “Michelle” is not the woman she claims she is.
How do you know? I have seen no evidence of this. Only evidence to the contrary. With his little slip of the tongue, OP acknowledged the ugly truth about men's lack of interest on ugly women.And you know what really aggravates me?Replies: @Rosie, @Chase, @S. Anonyia, @Bel Riose, @dcite, @MBlanc46
Ahh, but there’s the catch. Little Annie doesn’t want the ugly, or possibly even normal men.
OP acknowledged the ugly truth about men’s lack of interest on ugly women.
I’m confused. I was on a website where they cited surveys that claimed 90% of men thought 80% of all women were acceptable and attractive enough for a relationship, after matching for age and some other indicators, probably. Whereas only a minority of women, like 20%, thought most men acceptable enough. The jist of this was that it’s women’s fault people don’t get hitched, by being absurdly picky.
Or maybe they were just talking about brief encounters not vows.
Somebody is not being on the level here.
Indeed, the MGTOW/incels are liars. Although women say 80% of men are below average, they message them anyway. Men say your average woman is acceptably attractive, but then ignore them. I have explained this repeatedly. See the link I posted upthread.Replies: @Marty T
Somebody is not being on the level here.
Read the Devil’s Chessboard, bio of Allan Dulles, by David Talbot. Even if you think you know, it’s shocking, sickening and profoundly criminal what the CIA did in Latin America. As an American, I wouldn’t want people doing that stuff in my name even if it does make a lot of money for fruit growers and gives us cheaper bananas. While I sort of believed those pamphlets and papers they were handing out in the 1980s showing how the “U.S.” (CIA) participated in bloodshed in Central America, with little cartoon drawings of tiny dead children, I didn’t want to know the details. Now I do.
Even in those days, JFK wasn’t the only one who wanted to blow that organization into a 1,000 pieces.
The late Joan Rivers called Michele Obama a tranny but since she was a Jew from the left no one really said anything.
They didn’t waste time saying much. Just made sure she was dead 2 weeks later.
He understands. He just doesn’t care, he’s not a politicians. He’s business. It’s the critical observers who don’t understand what he understands.
Women are conformists
I’m not. I asked around
.
Moi non plus. But people don’t admire non-conformity in women and girls. Women may want a safer place because of kids and their own limitations. But quite frankly, men don’t want wild, wild wimmen.
Or at least not too often.
I don’t know if the shooter, if there really was just one or any, was mind-controlled, but I do absolutely know the public is being mind-controlled more than the occasional individual, by the media broadcasting these “shootings.”
I don’t know what Eisenhower’s ethnic background was, but he hated Germans and allowed atrocities in Germany after WWII, including an open air concentration camp full non-combattants (nobody was by then) where thousands died of starvation and exposure. I had no respect for him once I read about his policies after WWII. And I’m not even German.
The Obamas, contrary to popular opinion, are not popular. Why would they be? What did they do for anybody. Obama with his “you didn’t build that” to a bunch of businessmen who did just that. It was Obama who didn’t build anything. They just hauled his butt up, rigged the election per Eric Schmidt’s Google-magic, and voila, 8 years of deterioration and battering of national self-respect. Does anybody outside the liberal-loony tune of the DC Metro area, or the fairy lands of the upper northwest, seriously believe Obama was anything but a ghastly traitor?
As for Michelle, I don’t know if the gender-bending can continue indefinitely. There will be more Joan Rivers sacrificed on altar of Deep State secrecy I fear.
And anyway, the creature, whatever sex be-it, was briefly famous before they wiped it off the net, for having been caught on camera saying, “All this for a flag” while looking distastefully at some Marines trying to get control of a flag in the wind. Sort of a metaphor for the whole 8 years.
Oh, and the millions of tax-payer dollars spent on their vacations and the fact of their mysterious great wealth when all they had in 2008 was a big house in Chicago worth maybe 400,000.
You like hearing ‘Death To America’ chants?
Hearing such chants from groups in their own countries, after they were bombed by Americans, is something to be expected, but I wouldn’t want to live around it; very stressful. However, in my own country I pay more attention to what various groups do, than what they say. Dual Israeli-American citizenship, especially among people in our government, should be illegal. So should dual Russian or Chinese or Irish. That is so transparently obvious I am always left speechless by the fact it exists. And that’s why it still exists. It makes your eyes glaze over with disbelief.
um…there was a lot more tying Clay Shaw that whole “event” than being briefed by an intelligence agency. But this is not the thread for that.
men have more headaches? There is one sort called cluster headaches, very bad, which affect men. Migraines affect mostly women. I don’t know which are more common, but I believe it’s migraines. However, clusters are, on the average, worse. At least that’s what one cluster-headache sufferer, an Irisman who participated in medical studies, told me.
When the British left India in 1948, someone from a village near Delhi was asked what she thought of this momentous event. She replied she had never known the British had ever been in India.
The British never moved to India in huge numbers. They set up a banking and trade system, the British East India Company, and filled those jobs, numbering in the few thousands, not millions, with natives hired sometimes; but those jobs would not have been there if the Brits had not set them up.
It would have been better if the British had never exerted any empire design on India, but Indians were never, ever, in danger of losing their own culture (although the English did pass laws against suttee and child marriage), or of being overwhelmed by the English. In any case, the Indians now would not allow it, I’m sure.
Thing is, debates don’t solve anything. They are pointless.
Worse, they are just an attempt to impose your will on someone through “logic”. It’s a form of combat, it never gets anywhere.
Well, duh. Debates are not to change the debaters’ opinions. It’s an intellectual performance for others, some of whom who will either choose sides, or see the points of both, or be left indifferent. Whole nations have been swayed by debates. Mass conversions have occurred.
Debaters know that.
So your 'point' is that even if major mainstream newspapers go out of their way to portray Irish people as a form of simian, that is all done in good fun and they 'don't really mean it'?
One more time. National and religious animosities can lead to extreme insults
“The film ‘Gangs of New York’ is but one portrayal of this.”
oh god. The Gangs of New York? You think that’s history? Batman wasn’t around yet to keep things under control.
Homicide and violent crime was fairly rare among the Irish of the late 19th century. Mostly they were inclined drunkeness and got into fights. But rape and murder, very rare. Nor were they victimized by other whites to any great extent. The hardships were mostly working and living conditions, not violence.
Then I suppose those things barely happened at all...
Homicide and violent crime was fairly rare among the Irish of the late 19th century. Mostly they were inclined drunkeness and got into fights. But rape and murder, very rare.
http://www.thejournal.ie/irish-united-states-commit-crime-fighting-dangerous-2004406-Mar2015/
More than half of all crime committed in New York in the 1850s was by Irish-born individuals.
https://www.irishcentral.com/roots/history/thirty-two-years-of-heinous-crimes-in-19th-century-ireland-go-online
From the Maamtrasna slaughter to the 1882 Phoenix Park murders, Ireland in the 1800s had a murder rate seven times higher than it does today. Assaults were the most common crime, 28,353 cases of which were reported between 1861 and 1893.
Yes. The entire industry is greedy. That doesn’t mean they don’t produce some good products, allow some good deals. Or that some employed in it are not good people. But the people at the top, who run it, are there to make money. I once heard of a naturopath doctor whose herb field was destroyed by government agents after he claimed to have cured cancer, and made his cases public. The agents told him, “Cancer is our industry. Leave it alone.”
And looking at the power institutions supposedly devoted to curing cancer, and thinking of the money made by all the personnel, do you think they really want to cure anything?
Most doctors say they themselves would never do chemotherapy if they were diagnosed with cancer.
Holding the glass with both hands was a ritual easily recognized by the audience he was really addressing. That which we call the “globalists.” He was telling them he was swallowing them with both hands. It was done. The president is not one of “them,” but he knows what they understand.
If Trump was mentally impaired, he have been sent back to the Towers in a Christmas package by now.
Exactly! This ridiculous "Thomm" fellow is very obviously a foreigner, probably a Hindu immigrant, and pretending to be a "native-born white American"...but not doing a very good job of it!
Where do you come from? You show that tone-deafness of strangers in a strange land. You can know the textbook language and be totally unable to understand or speak in a normal way.
ah. Thanks for information. I was puzzled.
One more time. National and religious animosities can lead to extreme insults–the Saxons and Normans in 12th century Britain; the Walloons and the Flemings in Belgium, that sort of thing; and if they are an economic threat, it gets serious. The Irish were just white people, part of the European genetic cluster and easily able to assimilate among more high achieving whites, as soon as they got out of their extremely rural country, obscured their alien religion, lost their accents, and blended in. Genetically there is no dissimilarity from other northern Europeans, and the angst about them was theater for the most part. Even the “No Irish Need Apply” signs were myth. I was a little surprised to learn that. They were in worse condition of any immigrants on record when they arrived in America. It was largely Irish immigrants who caused the cholera epidemics in Boston and some other cities, to become such disasters. Not intentional, but still. If I were an old-stock dweller of those cities, I’d have hated the Irish too.
However, most (I can’t answer for all) 19th century opinions about them being sub-humans had all the black comedy of a SNL live skit featuring the Czech brothers. And then there were the large number of U.S. presidents descended from Scotch-Irish. But they were Protestants and therefore intrinsically human…?
You can find jokes among the cantons in Switzerland mocking each other in ways that sound serious, but I’m sure they feel more like one another than they feel like the Bangladeshi and Somali “migrants” I used to see hanging around railroad stations. I will never forget being in a cafeteria in a Swiss university and seeing a young Swiss man staring hard and not in a friendly way, at what looked like Somali man behind the counter. Like
are
you doing here? That was in 1989.
Whenever I hear that Ignatiev canard about the Irish, I know exactly the mentality talking.
So your 'point' is that even if major mainstream newspapers go out of their way to portray Irish people as a form of simian, that is all done in good fun and they 'don't really mean it'?
One more time. National and religious animosities can lead to extreme insults
The Rothschilds and Agnellis own the Economist. I knew there had to be some paranormal level of evil behind it, but never investigated. Now I understand.
Where have I done that in the last 21 days? You appear to be confused about the meaning of the word 'endlessly'. Plus, I proved to you that Irish people were considered subhuman in the US as recently as 1900, that too in the New York Times and Harpers. You avoided my point, since it proves you wrong.
he used to endlessly boast about the tremendous and growing success of Indians,
Point to specific examples. A drive-by claim like this is simply poor form on your part. There is apparently much less to Ron Unz than meets the eye. He knows little about subjects that he claims to specialize in, and the extent of his education is questionable. The concept of 'credentialed but not educated' comes to mind when describing Ron Unz. Among other things, he greatly excuses the illegal immigration of Hispanics, but then also wants a $12/hr minimum wage. Minimum wages are already a violation of Econ 101 concepts, but it really does not work when there are a mass of illegal immigrants in the labor pool. It is hard to claim Ron Unz is intelligent when he does not see this contradiction.Replies: @Malla, @Anon, @dcite
Furthermore, his style of writing seems to mark him as an agitated foreigner who learned English as an adult rather than someone who grew up with English as his first language.
Thomm,
Irish considered sub-human? I’m curious. Does the name Ignatiev mean anything to you? I haven’t read every comment so I don’t know if someone mentioned that Marxist fact-twister. Where do you come from? You show that tone-deafness of strangers in a strange land. You can know the textbook language and be totally unable to understand or speak in a normal way.
I have a long line of Irish ancestors; one, an Irish Catholic from County Kerry, was knighted by the king of England, probably for race horse training, in the early 1800s. A sort of Barry Lyndon, a book by Thackeray you should read for more enlightenment. The film was good too.
The Irish were likely to be despised in the mid-19th century America due to poverty and backwardness, not to mention religion. Everyone from a peasant background was seen as backward and “other”for reasons of language and custom; but that didn’t last long outside, maybe, Boston, and certainly the idea of them as a different race was, well, only skin deep. A veneer. An Irishman or Irishwoman who converted to Protestantism immediately assumed human dimensions even in 1850.
There are a few genetic differences, especially in the far west of Ireland, but the Irish are all but indistinguishable from other Brits (the white kind) and everybody always knew that because basic phenotype mostly tells the truth.
Exactly! This ridiculous "Thomm" fellow is very obviously a foreigner, probably a Hindu immigrant, and pretending to be a "native-born white American"...but not doing a very good job of it!
Where do you come from? You show that tone-deafness of strangers in a strange land. You can know the textbook language and be totally unable to understand or speak in a normal way.
You have to be a librarian to understand the beauty of that guy. Thank you.
Thank you. I keep pointing this out to the illiterate WN wiggers, but their ignorance of history knows no limits.
The Asians have not played a major role in this rot. In fact, if history holds true, they will in short order become honorary whites like the Irish and Italians before them.
The funny thing is that whenever the population of ‘whites’ in America falls below 65%, the definition of ‘white’ gets expanded, as you correctly point out, to top up the white percentage above 80% again.
This has already been done twice before (first with Ir
ish, and later with Italians, Poles, and Jews). It will happen again with Asians and whiter Hispanics. ”
well it does help that Irish, Italians, Poles, and Jews, actually were white as far as the phenotype of the vast majority of them.
Sometimes I think commenters here do tend to frame their notion of desirable mating through a combo of soft porn and 19th century Valentine Day cards. She can get pregnant at 36.Women do get pregnant at that age (and older) for the first time. It’s no great rarity. Fertility treatments are usually not needed till after 42 or so. It’s not as sure as at 26, but fairly ok. Starting young has the advantage of allowing more time, but most are pretty much done with one or two anyway. Although Kate is on her third. Still, this was likely an arranged union with a suitably mixed-race person who doesn’t particularly look it. Being able to put up with the Royal Protocol has broken even those who had it in their genes, culture, and family background, like Diana. Can’t see this Merkl lady lasting.
note bene: it’s clear that the number for Polish women with mixed babies is 6% of the total for Polish women, that being the 23% of the women whose children did not have Polish fathers. There are demographics within demographics. No wonder the MSM can claim it doesn’t lie.
You always come around trying to claim white achivements/white people for the black race. Classic. Why? Because some painting portrays slightly bulding eyes or a drooping lip? Are you insane?
There is nothing about the features in this painting that is out of the European phenotype, which is varied as are the phenotypes of others races.
You are, however, always good for a laugh. You are comically envious of white Europeans.
Why would they just go in and eliminate the one person who could actually tell us something about what really happened (or didn’t)? Why not take him prisoner? and it’s really sad the so many of the special forces who carried out the raid were killed a few months later.
There was black billowing smoke from the Pentagon, visible from the beltway in Maryland across the river. Strange thing is, it kept on billowing for about two days. Later I realized they used special effects. I also found it brazen that they said a plane flew into the building when a plane would have smashed into it, and then been on the ground in debris. There was virtually no evidence of plane remains. And that hole in the wall was way too small. And they wonder why we the awakened, don’t believe they are on our side.
Iraqis are Arabs if anyone is. Iranians are not.
Still, using the term legitimizes it somewhat more than it deserves. And it supports the agendas of the plutoligarchs and they are not mainstream by any means.Replies: @dcite
It is the mainstream tho.
So what do you call it? Other than “lies and omissions perpetrated by corporations, rich people, their bankers, and their puppets, who, concentrated into about 6 people, own and control the vast realm of print and digital media disseminated to the masses ?”
Is there a tiny url for it?
“The Girl with the Pearl Earring,” fictional account of the Vermeer’s model for that famous portrait, was probably a servant considering her mode of dress and expression. The servant girl is groped by an enthusiastic, important guest, while serving at the family dinner table. Vermeer and family are mildly embarrassed but indifferent. Shocked and worried about the old guy’s plans, she quickly consummates her courtship with her boyfriend so that he will have no reason to doubt her virtue. Had she been attacked by the important guest, she would not have said anything to anyone. Everyone would have called her names–like, maybe, crow or buzzard. The misery would have been compounded and the important man’s discomfiture, not hers, would have left a worst taste for everyone who mattered. Only murder would have made her a sympathetic character.
In the Old Testament, there is the story of Susannah, and the story of Joseph. Both involve false accusations by rejected lusters, one of a woman, one of a man. This has always gone on.
I’m sure a few of the real victims of sexual assault and murder could testify to an equal or greater fury on the part of a man, though whether it was because he was scorned or not would be a matter for the jury to decide.
Most of us, regardless of our sex, see from our own pov most viscerally, even Shakespeare and Congreve. Some people can think again upon reflection.
I think people like him lack some characteristic that prevents the rest of us from behaving like animals. However, they can't be stupid. In fact, I suspect Kaffaffee, and people like him, have a real insight into psychology that the rest of us don't have. Otherwise, they couldn't maintain power so long...Replies: @dcite
Khadaffy Duck was crazy and stupid
You should know better than to believe MSM on the subject of a “dictator” that appears to be revered by his own people and hated by American. Qadaffi made Libya bloom in the southern part of the country. He was using oil money to in Library what the Israelis had done in Israel, turning desert into fertile soil. One Libyan during the “revolt” was quoted as wondering what the hell was going on. Libyans were fine. Any Libyan could take out a loan and get money for education, a house, etc. They did not want Qadaffi removed. Clinton wanted Qadaffi removed, and her banker buddies, because Libya was not playing by the globalist rules of banking. Most of the middle eastern countries were not, which is why the neocons targeted them for destruction in the 1990s. Seven countries. Now, the only countries not playing are North Korea and Cuba, I think.
Should have just paid him to keep Africa out of Europe. But no. Clinton had to get her money.
I support the Donald because the alternative was Hillary. But this was a mistake. He probably lowered his poll ratings by intervening in the case, and cost some local criminal justice system hundreds of thousands of dollars in incarceration and parole expenses at some point in the future. In China, at least, they might have been scared straight after years in Chinese prison. Stateside, they'll just continue offending.
Why would Trump expended valuable POTUS ‘capital’ on these worthless individuals?
Plus, now Trump owes a favour to Xi Jinping.
And surprise, surprise: these guys feel so entitled being basketball “stars” and all, that they didn’t even bother thanking The Donald*.
You only listen to CNN and WaPo? The NYT? You were a Trump supporter? Really? Considering the absolute and total MSM enmity, of which I have never seen the like in my like, what he has accomplished is extraordinary over the past years. The Chinese appear to know this. They seem to have a keener awareness of who to respect.
There are over a 1,000 sealed indictments right now indicating an massive sting operation, HRC very likely among them. The Podestas have dissolved their lobbying group after being arrested, ostensibly for money laundering, but far worse is what they are really known for. A “body farm” associated with the Clinton’s was raided in Oregon. DACA has been addressed just the other day by Sessions as against constitutional law, allowed illegally by Obama, and will no longer be tolerated. Virtually none of this was reported by the MSM which concentrated on the nonsense about allegations against Moore, and the Russian nothing burger. Oh yeah, all the Russian accuations thrown by the Clintons and other Democrats are turning out to be on their own faces. Again, minimal MSM coverage.
btw, I don’t belong to a party. Parties are so yesterday.
You don't seem to read contemporary scientific journals all that much.
Evolution has always only been a theory, supported by a very small amount of bones.
You don’t seem to read contemporary scientific journals all that much.
Possibly a bit behind. Is it two coffins now? They’ve found a few generations of Swedes who are starting to look more like Nigerians after living in a tropical climate? Whatever anyone’s personal awareness of the latest scientific research that would be disseminated to the masses, and which all has a political slant because of who funds and publishes it, evolution remains a theory, and not the only theory (no, I don’t mean creationism.) People hold to these theories as to a religion. Even the nuns in Catholic school were teaching evolution decades ago. You’re right. They adapted.
Of course adaptation occurs, but whole races of people obediently evolving in tandem from “adaptations” or random selection? Eskimos, Aleuts and Siberian natives are not blond and never will be. Genetic engineering by more advanced, off-earth d0-gooders makes more sense to me than that.
But that’s just me.
Why not? The current theory is that the White man didn't originate in Europe but came there from somewhere (jury is still out on exactly where). After a while (how long is also up for grabs) he became what he is; intelligence, strength, skin tone, etc.
You can’t make a negro out of a White man just by plopping him into bright sunlight for a few centuries.
Sure, but we aren't talking about simply the sunlight, we are talking about the entire environment. And yes, centuries is a short time - millenia is not.
bright sunlight for a few centuries
OK so we agree here - so I asked Priss to explain why. So please explain why in a convincing way? Why is the White man, who is a result of environmental selective pressures on the European continent somehow insulated from selective pressures in a different environment? I'm open to discussion on this.
I will not deny that landscape, environment, food, and many other things have a terroir effect on the development of all organisms
Evolution has always only been a theory, supported by a very small amount of bones. Some say only enough to fit in a coffin. Darwin himself called it a theory and it fit with the tenor of his times, or at least with the trendy of the day.
To think that Swedes, breeding only among themselves, would turn into Nigerians after some tens of thousands of decades of living in West Africa, is absurd. And also vice versa. Absurd. \
We act like we already know everything there is to know about our history on this planet. We do not.
And accepting theories put forward 150 years ago, as fact which no “scientific” person should challenge, is not how to find answers. Science has become the new religion and woe to anyone who challenges the accepted dogma. Sometimes it seems we’re actually moving backwards.
As I mentioned, I find some aspects of the theory quite sound and some not so. I have the same reservations as you do since I don't believe we know the whole picture and it is constantly being revised:
We act like we already know everything there is to know about our history on this planet. We do not.
I share your skepticism of Scientism.
Science has become the new religion and woe to anyone who challenges the accepted dogma.
You don't seem to read contemporary scientific journals all that much.
Evolution has always only been a theory, supported by a very small amount of bones.
False. I am actually condemning the Yale Sophomore. If you were literate, you would see that in my original comment.
P.S., “Thomm” has always “felt” very South/SW Asian to me. They really are the worst.
I got that Thomm was being critical. Unless he’s being facetious. There are Indians that would snicker at Mr. Pal behind his back.
Whenever anybody tells me blacks “built” the cities, it sounds so absurd. The urbanizing areas of 19th and early 20th century America had very few blacks and enormous white immigrant working class populations. 1/3 of Cinciannati was white immigrant in 1890. The death rate among Irish immigrants in laboring jobs was particularly high. A history professor said the Irish were preferred for really dangerous jobs in the ante-bellum South because there was an unending supply of them, and blacks were too expensive to risk. A black co-worker taking the class passed that on to me.
Even in the late 20th century they had to find builders from Italy to refurbish the mayor’s mansion in downtown Baltimore. I still remember people being afraid that the future mayors would all be black, and the exquisite mansion would be gradually destroyed. They’d had experience with black takeovers and it was never good. I don’t know what it looks like today.
Blacks’ labor was, however, crucial in maintaining cities in the Gulf area and probably other southern cities. Apparently even skilled labor became associated with black or “mulattos” and even skills like brick laying would indicate someone’s race. This did not happen outside the Gulf area. I think the French/Spanish influence had something to do with the attitudes in New Orleans and the Gulf area.
White creole women even insisted that their husbands be born in Europe and not America, which led to a lot of interesting arrangements.
They’ve “allowed” Malays to kill them in Malaysia and other southeast Asian places where they settled. World on Fire
We’re only “howling” over his one corpse. He howled over millions. There’s difference.
And anyway, he started it.
Looks a little like school shooter Adam Lanza:
Lenin looks haunted and insane in that photo
“He [Lenin] clubbed so many rabbits to death with the butt of his rifle that the boat sank under the weight of all the dead bodies.”
I’m not surprised. Only a psychopath can perpetrate so deliberately, so much death and mayhem, and then get worshiped by people who never knew him because he — did what exactly? Millions of people would have lived had Lenin never been, and also countless rabbits, murdered not for meat or fur, but because Lenin just wanted to. Shelley’s poetic observation on these monstrous egos:
I met a traveler from an antique land,
Who said—“Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desert. . . . Near them, on the sand,
Half sunk a shattered visage lies, whose frown,
And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command,
Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
The hand that mocked them, and the heart that fed;
And on the pedestal, these words appear:
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal Wreck, boundless and bare
The lone and level sands stretch far away.”
Funny that you are fixated on "Afro American atrocities" within a day or two of another white man committing yet another gross atrocity. That goes to my point that you people don't care a whit about "black crime," most of which are conjured up in your minds. You just find it a convenient vehicle through which to express your irrational hatred. News accounts are dripping with atrocities committed by whites daily. But you don't care because you don't actually care about crime or atrocities.Replies: @joef, @dcite
Again you are guilty of making inaccurate assumptions… just as speaking of afro american atrocities, in defensive terms, is not the same as advocating the offensive harming of afros…
Many of the “gross atrocities” are hoaxes, or staged. Even so, you’re right. It’s mostly whites who are contriving and staging. Take a look at Ole Dammegard’s research.
But real crime is being committed, and by and large, it’s not white on black. Very rare. Black on white. Very common. Every white person living in a heavily black area has experienced it personally or vicariously.
Does this guy really think I'm white?Replies: @dcite, @joef
When it comes down to it, your white guilt does not supersede our right to protect ourselves from afro initiated aggression.
Does this guy really think I’m white?
This reader didn’t but the fact that “josef” thought you might be, shows how willfully insane he realizes some whites are.
Basically is about kicking dead lion. Some find this article brilliant. I find it nauseating. Posting photo of a very sick man at the end of his life is pretty low in my opinion.
A lion? More like a jackal. And a liar. And a hypocrite. And a sociopath. Just out for power like all dictators. This article just described millions of people who had no control over Lenin’s demons, being murdered, destroyed economically, labeled parasites while doing all the work that provided anything good, like food, clothing, shelter and education. Communism was responsible for mega-deaths. Lenin looks haunted and insane in that photo; because he was, morally. Sickness alone doesn’t give that expression.
It boils down to this: Lenin caused more horror and bloodshed than would have happened if he’d just got out of Dodge and let it alone. Russia was “progressing” just fine without him. He is one of those many people the world would have been better off without.
Looks a little like school shooter Adam Lanza:
Lenin looks haunted and insane in that photo
There are highly intelligent, and even fairly objective, blacks that are light years above TNC. People who can speak on behalf of their race and still sound sane and sensible. This man is obsessed because of his inferiority complex. He doesn’t want “race as a construct” because that way he can insert himself into all those great achievements and doings he reads about without having to restrict himself to Great Victim. The tragic dilemma is, he’s not all that brilliant or special and if there is no race to worry about, and he wouldn’t be paid two cents for his tripe.
“Intellectuals” in general are cherry picked for the narratives they bring to the table that invites them, depending the trends.
The Dominican Republic encouraged European, including Jewish, immigration during the reign of Trujillo, 1930s to early 60s. Also allowed Lebanaese in. Although he was part Haitian himself, Trujillo actively kept Haitians from coming over the border, even going so far as to murder them if they tried. Dominicans are a mixture of black, white, and native, but Trujillo was of the conviction that the country would sink if the balance tipped towards more black. I don’t see much evidence anywhere in the world that he was wrong.