He sold out and became an establishment hack in many ways in the 21st century.
 

But reading critically (and, yes, obsessively) Mr. Buchanan’s disingenuous columns whitewashing Uncle Sam, characterizing as allies Washington’s satrapies, and demonizing the targeted autocrats and regimes here at The Unz Review did help many of us to more clearly see what an Exceptionally! propagandized country this is.

Thanks, Pat.

Right-wing Populists in the US would probably want to vote for Putin for President ... of the US, if they read this. Sorry for the length.

Putin's comments on the cultural changes in the West at the Valdai Conference:

“We look in amazement at the processes underway in the countries which have been traditionally looked at as the standard-bearers of progress. Of course, the social and cultural shocks that are taking place in the United States and Western Europe are none of our business; we are keeping out of this. Some people in the West believe that an aggressive elimination of entire pages from their own history, ‘reverse discrimination’ against the majority in the interests of a minority, and the demand to give up the traditional notions of mother, father, family and even gender, they believe that all of these are the mileposts on the path towards social renewal.

“Listen, I would like to point out once again that they have a right to do this, we are keeping out of this. But we would like to ask them to keep out of our business as well. We have a different viewpoint, at least the overwhelming majority of Russian society – it would be more correct to put it this way – has a different opinion on this matter. We believe that we must rely on our own spiritual values, our historical tradition and the culture of our multiethnic nation.

“The advocates of so-called ‘social progress’ believe they are introducing humanity to some kind of a new and better consciousness…. The only thing that I want to say now is that their prescriptions are not new at all. It may come as a surprise to some people, but Russia has been there already. After the 1917 revolution, the Bolsheviks, relying on the dogmas of Marx and Engels, also said that they would change existing ways and customs and not just political and economic ones, but the very notion of human morality and the foundations of a healthy society. The destruction of age-old values, religion and relations between people, up to and including the total rejection of family (we had that, too), encouragement to inform on loved ones – all this was proclaimed progress and, by the way, was widely supported around the world back then and was quite fashionable, same as today. By the way, the Bolsheviks were absolutely intolerant of opinions other than theirs.

“This, I believe, should call to mind some of what we are witnessing now. Looking at what is happening in a number of Western countries, we are amazed to see the domestic practices, which we, fortunately, have left, I hope, in the distant past. The fight for equality and against discrimination has turned into aggressive dogmatism bordering on absurdity, when the works of the great authors of the past – such as Shakespeare – are no longer taught at schools or universities, because their ideas are believed to be backward. The classics are declared backward and ignorant of the importance of gender or race. In Hollywood memos are distributed about proper storytelling and how many characters of what colour or gender should be in a movie. This is even worse than the agitprop department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.

“Countering acts of racism is a necessary and noble cause, but the new ‘cancel culture’ has turned it into ‘reverse discrimination’ that is, reverse racism… [….]

“In a number of Western countries, the debate over men’s and women’s rights has turned into a perfect phantasmagoria. Look, beware of going where the Bolsheviks once planned to go – not only communising chickens, but also communising women. One more step and you will be there.

“Zealots of these new approaches even go so far as to want to abolish these concepts altogether. Anyone who dares mention that men and women actually exist, which is a biological fact, risk being ostracised. ‘Parent number one’ and ‘parent number two,’ ‘birthing parent’ instead of ‘mother,’ and ‘human milk’ replacing ‘breastmilk’ because it might upset the people who are unsure about their own gender. I repeat, this is nothing new; in the 1920s, the so-called Soviet Kulturtraegers also invented some newspeak believing they were creating a new consciousness and changing values that way. And, as I have already said, they made such a mess it still makes one shudder at times.

“Not to mention some truly monstrous things when children are taught from an early age that a boy can easily become a girl and vice versa. That is, the teachers actually impose on them a choice we all supposedly have. They do so while shutting the parents out of the process and forcing the child to make decisions that can upend their entire life. They do not even bother to consult with child psychologists – is a child at this age even capable of making a decision of this kind? Calling a spade a spade, this verges on a crime against humanity, and it is being done in the name and under the banner of progress.

“Well, if someone likes this, let them do it. I have already mentioned that, in shaping our approaches, we will be guided by a healthy and strong conservatism.”

Replies: @geokat62

If right-wing populists in the US actually understood Putin, they would wish he were the US President.

Sorry for the length.

Putin's comments on the cultural changes in the West at the Valdai Conference:

“We look in amazement at the processes underway in the countries which have been traditionally looked at as the standard-bearers of progress. Of course, the social and cultural shocks that are taking place in the United States and Western Europe are none of our business; we are keeping out of this. Some people in the West believe that an aggressive elimination of entire pages from their own history, ‘reverse discrimination’ against the majority in the interests of a minority, and the demand to give up the traditional notions of mother, father, family and even gender, they believe that all of these are the mileposts on the path towards social renewal.

“Listen, I would like to point out once again that they have a right to do this, we are keeping out of this. But we would like to ask them to keep out of our business as well. We have a different viewpoint, at least the overwhelming majority of Russian society – it would be more correct to put it this way – has a different opinion on this matter. We believe that we must rely on our own spiritual values, our historical tradition and the culture of our multiethnic nation.

“The advocates of so-called ‘social progress’ believe they are introducing humanity to some kind of a new and better consciousness…. The only thing that I want to say now is that their prescriptions are not new at all. It may come as a surprise to some people, but Russia has been there already. After the 1917 revolution, the Bolsheviks, relying on the dogmas of Marx and Engels, also said that they would change existing ways and customs and not just political and economic ones, but the very notion of human morality and the foundations of a healthy society. The destruction of age-old values, religion and relations between people, up to and including the total rejection of family (we had that, too), encouragement to inform on loved ones – all this was proclaimed progress and, by the way, was widely supported around the world back then and was quite fashionable, same as today. By the way, the Bolsheviks were absolutely intolerant of opinions other than theirs.

“This, I believe, should call to mind some of what we are witnessing now. Looking at what is happening in a number of Western countries, we are amazed to see the domestic practices, which we, fortunately, have left, I hope, in the distant past. The fight for equality and against discrimination has turned into aggressive dogmatism bordering on absurdity, when the works of the great authors of the past – such as Shakespeare – are no longer taught at schools or universities, because their ideas are believed to be backward. The classics are declared backward and ignorant of the importance of gender or race. In Hollywood memos are distributed about proper storytelling and how many characters of what colour or gender should be in a movie. This is even worse than the agitprop department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.

“Countering acts of racism is a necessary and noble cause, but the new ‘cancel culture’ has turned it into ‘reverse discrimination’ that is, reverse racism… [….]

“In a number of Western countries, the debate over men’s and women’s rights has turned into a perfect phantasmagoria. Look, beware of going where the Bolsheviks once planned to go – not only communising chickens, but also communising women. One more step and you will be there.

“Zealots of these new approaches even go so far as to want to abolish these concepts altogether. Anyone who dares mention that men and women actually exist, which is a biological fact, risk being ostracised. ‘Parent number one’ and ‘parent number two,’ ‘birthing parent’ instead of ‘mother,’ and ‘human milk’ replacing ‘breastmilk’ because it might upset the people who are unsure about their own gender. I repeat, this is nothing new; in the 1920s, the so-called Soviet Kulturtraegers also invented some newspeak believing they were creating a new consciousness and changing values that way. And, as I have already said, they made such a mess it still makes one shudder at times.

“Not to mention some truly monstrous things when children are taught from an early age that a boy can easily become a girl and vice versa. That is, the teachers actually impose on them a choice we all supposedly have. They do so while shutting the parents out of the process and forcing the child to make decisions that can upend their entire life. They do not even bother to consult with child psychologists – is a child at this age even capable of making a decision of this kind? Calling a spade a spade, this verges on a crime against humanity, and it is being done in the name and under the banner of progress.

“Well, if someone likes this, let them do it. I have already mentioned that, in shaping our approaches, we will be guided by a healthy and strong conservatism.”

Replies: @mulga mumblebrain

Putin is definitely playing the Jews. They have lots of power even in Russia, which they're rapidly losing thank God! Anyone who thinks otherwise has drank too much conspiracy theory Kool Aid. He's not the white nationalist hero for the white nationalist bloggers and commenters on the web, but he's an ally of sorts and a very powerful one at that. Just like Rand Paul, he can be of value to conservative movements around the world. Just saying...

Replies: @SteveK9, @SteveK9

If most Jews were like Ron Unz our societies would be immeasurably better.

Indeed, looking at the author's name alone, one could easily be forgiven for giving his book a pass based on a well-justified assumption that his Jew biases have rendered its contents irrelevant.

There's a book, titled Blood Libel (I believe, having read it many years ago), written by a rabbi that details every historical account of jews sacrificing the children of goyim. It was well researched, detailed and foot noted. Of course, I can't find it now - having just looked.

Replies: @Flo, @Complex Pseudonymic Handle

Thanks. I will correct the equation. And I think "Jew" came from "yew" which is a tree. Or that is a
speculation.

Anyway, to be an anti-semite isn't to be anti-jew as the origin of the Jews is the Russian steppes. And they all look European not Arabic. They just pretend to be semitic.

Kurds are indo-European! I've got a lot to learn.

Replies: @RadicalCenter

I was about to post something similar, no sympathy for mudsharks and their mixed offspring are no loss either.

As for the wrong place at the wrong time, the wrong place is near blacks and the wrong time is any time they are awake.

You just noticed that? Just now?

It should give us a clue to how dire the propaganda situation is that even people who visit unz.com are liable to be pretty ignorant of how the world works.

There is anecdotal evidence that White women who are involved sexually with Negro men are disproportionately emotionally disturbed, victims of sexual abuse as children, etc.
There was a case in Wilkes-Barre PA in 1982, when a middle-aged mulatto murdered several of the children that he had fathered with White women, and some of the women themselves.
Is it not true that at least a plurality of mulattos hate not only Whites, but also themselves?

Replies: @Etruscan Film Star

Toll paid by these traitors !

Except they didn't say that. The exact words were "We were there to document the event." "There" in this context referred to the rooftop of a van on which they were filming the impact of the attack on the WTC after the building had been struck by a plane. Unfortunately, Maria's testimony describes the van driving up after the attack:

http://www.thehypertexts.com/Twin%20Towers%209-11%20Five%20Dancing%20Israelis%20Mossad%20Donald%20Trump.htm

-----
So, I grab my binoculars and I could see the towers from my window. And this is where I, you know, I'm looking. I saw the smoke from the top, just from the top of the towers. ... Like a few minutes must have gone on, and all of a sudden down there I see this van park.
-----

While these Israeli agents were certainly following the Islamic terrorist suspects, there's no evidence that they began filming before the attack occurred. They clearly knew that something was in the works, and very likely the CIA received reports about this through the Mossad. But there's no evidence that they were sent to document the event. They were sent to track suspected Arab terrorists and relay any information back to Mossad chiefs. "We were there" refers more narrowly to "there on the van taking pictures after the attack started" rather than "sent" to the US.

Replies: @Zane

Being anti-theocratic isn't neocon or neoliberal.

If anything, the current West is theocratic where we can't question the holy Jews, homos, and blacks as the new Tri-Idolatry.

I'm calling for neo-fascist modernity, a national socialism, where religion is respected but doesn't rob one of reason and freedom.

Israel model of governance(at least for Jews) is more workable because even as Israel shows respect for religion and rabbis, it is a modern state where people are free as individuals.

There are turncoat Iranians doing the bidding of Zion, and these must be dragged out and punished.
But there are patriotic Iranians who want a genuinely modern Iran where one doesn't have to lick the boot of theocracy.

Theocracy sucks. Granted, Allah and Jehovah are infinitely better than worshiping negro thuggery, homo perversion, and Jewish gangsterism, but the people of Iran shouldn't be forced by Islamic code written in the Medieval era.

Replies: @Saba

Not a Jew, sorry. You're wrong. Next troll, please.

Want to get rid of J*daism? First get rid of Christianity.