[go: up one dir, main page]

Showing posts with label cult. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cult. Show all posts

Friday, November 22, 2013

'80s Cult Fun: They Live

It's amazing how a topical film from around 25 years ago still feels topical today.  Today's film is They Live, a movie that I've seen before.  Why am I finally reviewing it then?  Well, the film has gotten more play in the last year with a new DVD/Blu-Ray release and a series of jokes in Saints Row IV about it.  Seriously, the game has Keith David as the Vice-President who must escape a manufactured World run by aliens.  Who helps him?  Roddy Piper, of course!  It's brilliant.  For neophytes, Live is a 1987 John Carpenter film about a man named Nada who doesn't seem to quite fit in.  When he stumbles across a box full of cheap sunglasses (not to be confused with the ZZ Top song), things change and he discovers a purpose for his life.  Can he save us all or will we just end up being overrun by the aliens?  To find out, read on...
Nada (Piper) arrives in the big city looking for work.  He has skills, but he still can't catch a break.
There is a mysterious person preaching on TV about people being controlled.  He finds it suspicious and stumbles across his lair.  They get raided by the Cops, however, and he finds a box full of black sunglasses.

All I find are bags of money.  Damn my bad luck!
When he wears them, he sees the truth.  We are being controlled by the audio-visual aspects of the world and our World is full of freaky alien guys.

The aliens don't take kindly to their plot being found out.
Oh joy- Meg Foster and her too-light eyes are here.  This one of those films that makes people just not trust her.

Oh yeah, the plot.  She is his hostage, but seems to sell him out.  He escapes and seeks help.
In the film's most famous scene, Pipe and David fight over the latter not wanting to put on the sunglasses.  This fight scene runs continuously for about 10 minutes and features almost no cuts/editing (if any).

If this seems familiar, South Park did the scene shot-for-shot with Timmy and Jimmy.  Someone on YouTube mixed the two together for convenience's sake.  Plus it's weird.
Finally convinced, David joins Piper as they find the group.  They are the resistance against this new threat, so they make a plan and bring alot of guns.

Yes, this is similar to The Matrix.  Yes, it did come out over a decade earlier.  Yes, I'm done belaboring this point.
The whole thing leads to a raid on a TV Station- which Foster works at- that broadcasts the signal that tricks us all.

For some reason, they trust Meg Foster.  She's Evil Lynn- why would you do that?!?
I won't SPOIL the whole thing here, but the truth manages to get out.  Seeing these guys in Color for the first time- freaky.  The End.
They still hold up.  Yes, the film was about Reagan-Era Consumerism and how shallow we could be.  What helps the movie out is that it never specifically identifies itself as such.  There's no Reagan analog.  There's no bad 1980's music (since Carpenter worked on the Soundtrack).  Hell, there's not really even much bad fashion to date the thing.  There are a lot of bad 1980s films that feature woman wearing those giant shoulder pads.  There are also a lot of good 1980s films that feature people wearing way too much neon and suit jackets with the sleeves rolled up.  Where They Live shines is making itself feel timeless.  So much of the Effects were done cheaply, but hold up to pretty modern scrutiny.  My Stinger is probably the most blatantly-fake and even that is a stretch to many, I'm sure.  Is Piper the best Actor out there?  No.  He works really well with the material though, something that I can't say about other films he's been in.  This film's biggest crime is giving you a Roddy Piper film of a quality that just couldn't be matched.  If you haven't seen They Live, do so now.  If you have, give it another look.  As someone who is willing to openly-criticize Directors I like- see Carpenter's Village of the Damned-, I maintain that this one is worth another look.  Take us away, most awkward thing to discover during sex...
Up next, another Project Terrible film.  If your film is not a Comedy or a Horror Film, what the hell is it?  Stay tuned...

Sunday, September 12, 2010

9/12 Die: Guyana- Crime of the Century

Last year on 9/12, a man went to Washington to hold a rally.  That man was Glenn Beck.  Besides being loud and abrasive, the man is also a dangerous idiot.  Three times now, he's made statements along the lines of 'Group A is going to to get you & only you can protect yourselves.'  Three times, some listener of his has shot up a police station/military base/political building following those remarks.  You do the math.  In honor of the anniversary of his "million-strong" rally, I want to review the tale of a similar man- Jim Jones.  Mind you, in this bio-pic film, he's actually Jim Johnson.  It's funny because they make a note to say that 'the names of the innocent have been changed'...and so has his.  Coincidence?  They also change the name of famous Senator 'Leo Ryan' to 'Lee O'Brien.'  Oh good, because I wouldn't remember the only Senator ever killed in the line of duty...a year after it happened.  This film was made the year after the tragic events in Guyana and comes to us from 'acclaimed' director Rene Cardona Jr, the man behind Cyclone (the one with the plane crash, not the bike) and Tintorera.  For those who don't know, he was following in the footsteps of Rene Cardona Sr, his father and fellow director of genre films.  I tell you this so that your standards are properly gauged for the film to come.  Get out your delicious Flavor Aid for my review of...
The film begins with some long, lingering shots of the San Francisco era.  Cliched establishing footage or the darkest Full House episode ever- you decide!  After that, we get a man shooting himself in the head.  Who is this?  What context is there?  'I don't know' and 'none' would be the answers.  Seriously, this scene apparently takes place in March 1979, while all of the Jonestown/Johnsontown deaths took place in 1978.  Explain, movie!  Instead of doing this, they give us nearly ten minutes straight of Johnson/Jones (Stuart Whitman) giving a speech to his flock about how they have to move.  Cutting right to the chase, huh?  While Whitman does play the character well, this is way too long to hold the scene.  After that, we get another several minutes of Congressman Lee O'Brien (no relation to Conan) talking about Jim Johnson/Jones.  Way to grab them early, Rene!  After all of that, the flock moves out of the city and out of the country, where nothing bad would ever happen...ever.
In Johnsontown/Jonestown, things seem perfect.  The people are happy, James Johnson/Jim is free to engage in rampant sex (not shown, but implied) and Joseph Cotton is in town.  Unfortunately, some kids steal supplies and totally kill the town's buzz.  This leads to some graphic and brutal punishment.  As my brother said at the time 'fortunately, the print is so washed out that you can't see anything.'  This leads to some dissent in the town, while the Elders insist that what was done had to be done.  In America, we get more talk about O'Brien being concerned about Johnsontown/Jonestown.  Finally, he heads over there by plane.  Actually, to be fair, he heads to a nearby village by plane and then heads to Johnsontown/Jonestown by way of a different plane.  I appreciate the authenticity of that, I really do, but you could have simplified that.  If you aren't going to give people the same names, why keep this aspect intact?  Everything seems fine in the cult town, leading O'Brien to state that 'all of the people I've talked to have shown that they are happy to be here.'  That's Senatorial slang for 'people are slipping me notes about how they want to escape, but I won't say anything.'  O'Brien eventually comes clean to Johnson/Jones about the fact that he's there on a Congressional Inquiry.  He takes it well.
Of course, you know that things don't end well.  If you don't, you really went to a shoddy, second-rate School.  Seriously, get a refund!  Johnson/Jones has a bit of a freak-out when he finds out that some of his people are leaving, but manages to control himself.  As the group prepares to board their tiny plane, a group of men from the cult arrive alongside the airstrip and start firing.  To the film's credit, they match their footage to the real event pretty well, even nailing the frantic tone as well.  That night, Johnson/Jones gives a big speech about how they can't get amnesty anywhere else due to the killings, so death is the only answer.  This is the film's big moment, so they play it for all it's worth!  In contrast to the believed-reality of the situation, the film shows many people trying to escape and/or drinking the Flavor Aid at gunpoint.  What's the point of a Cult if they won't follow you in a Suicide Pact?  We get some trippy footage of Johnson/Jones talking to a drugged-out, dying cult member that's right out of a music video.  In the end, they're all dead.  So, again, who was the guy committing suicide in the beginning again?  Got me.  The End.
This movie shouldn't suck, but it kind of does.  This is a subject rife for a teleplay/screenplay, but this one just falters.  They somehow make a lot of this stuff just seem dull by drawing it out or playing it too subtle.  It's a crazy cult that practically worships a man- make it interesting!  Hell, because they skip out on a lot of material, they ruin it.  Jones apparently discouraged sex between unmarried cult members, but engaged in sex with both the female and male members!  I know it's a touchy subject, but you really missed out on an opportunity.  In fact, a little film called Eaten Alive made better use out of this material!  It's not a good movie, but it makes it more interesting at least.  There's also a film called Guyana Tragedy from 1980 (see Amazon link below) which stars Powers Boothe as Jones.  Is that film better?  Maybe we'll find out next 9/12...or whenever I decide to see it.  As far as this film is concerned, it's exploitation that does a bad job of making the exploitation interesting.  Much like some of the more dull Blaxploitation or Jungle Peril films, I have to ask: what's the point?
Next up, we step away from political territory and into a Giallo film.  It's also the beginning of 'Sounds Like' Week- bonus!  Stay tuned...

Saturday, July 25, 2009

Blockbuster Trash: Bryan Loves You

I should have known better. I really, really should have known better. I saw this movie when it was one of the six or seven new releases that week. As my bad luck would have it, I got the three movies that I cared the least to see (the others were Re-Cycle, which was not bad, and Vengeance, a future review). This movie was bound to be dumb, but I thought 'why the hell not?!?' That movie was 'hell' alright. Find out more in my review of...
Our story begins with Tony Todd appearing and telling us that everything that we are about to see is real. The footage was recovered later by the FBI and must be seen. To review: famous movie star Tony Todd is telling us that the movie he is presenting is real. Right. The movie proper begins with a nerdy couple filming a bit of home movies explaining the basic set-up. A lady friend of theirs is having some weird moments at work. She is a school teacher and everyone is talking about someone named Bryan. In fairness, everything after Todd looks pretty real. By that, of course, I mean that it is badly-lit and barely-audible.
The movie jumps to the teacher's classroom, which apparently has a security camera in it. This just happens to get the entire shot they need in it to boot! The Principal makes an announcement over the P.A. that they are going to pay tribute to Bryan. The kids put on stupid masks and recite a chant. When the teacher shows no interest, one of the students attacks her, before being pulled away. We cut to a couple days later and our heroes have not seen the lady. They go to her house and, naturally, bring a camera to film everything. Since they are both psychologists and love to study cults, this all works out well for them. After a few minutes of them meandering in the dark, the crazed teacher bursts out of the bathroom with a knife. They kill her in self-defense, shocked by this turn of events. The real shock- I am still watching.
The next scene is possibly the dumbest in the history of contrived coincidences. Our hero finds a house on the edge of town that is full of Bryan's followers. They leave their building, but not before one of them does the 'suddenly turn around towards the camera' fake-out scare. With the cult mere feet away, the man goes into their house and closes the door. What?!? He touches all their stuff and reads a random book they left out that talks about Bryan. Without getting caught, he goes to a friend who explains some bullshit about Bryan being some unrecognized Saint or something. If the film won't properly explain things, then neither will I! Our heroes secretly film a cult ceremony in a Church rec room, but the girl is kidnapped. The effect of her feed cutting out from capture is sort of interesting, but overshadowed by everything else.
Unfortunately, the movie is full of pointless, silly performances that kill any drama that the film might muster. First, you have George Wendt as...well, a crazy guy. He goes to see our hero for his treatment, but just says weird things. It is a performance right out of a school play- I blame the director. The other is Lloyd Kauffman as...well, a different crazy guy. He does nothing good and just yells about how he knows kung-fu. The less said about him, the better.
The movie only goes downhill from here. Our hero's girlfriend is locked up in the cult's basement, which has three different security cameras. They cut away before we see any torture done to her. Did the FBI cut away or did an E.M.P. go off? The guy gets too close to the truth and gets locked up in a sanitarium by the powers that be. If you ever wanted to see a bunch of nobodies play mental patients, you are in luck. The guy eventually manages to get away, thanks to the timely intervention of annoying-old-man-who-produces-New-Jersey-crap. It all leads to...sorry, no spoilers today. I will say this though: the ending really makes the beginning a bit confusing and improbable. This is why you write the ending of a mystery first and work backwards, idiot!
*
This movie is utter crap. The acting ranges from over-the-top (stupid Wendt) to overly-subdued. Is it because of the actors trying to portray real people? No. They just cannot act. If I was to try and act again (my friend's un-finished film Highlander: Heritage being missed already) and could not do it, I would not be praised for my 'subtlety.' The hidden/hand-held camera gimmick can be interesting if done right- it is not. Does being low-budget allow me to give the movie leeway with some issues? No, not really. If you cannot make a movie without a million dollars, do not do it. I won't judge you for waiting. If you make crap like this, I will definitely judge you. Try again, Seth Landau!
*
How about a return to bi-polar theater? I will kill you! I'm sorry- let's not fight. Stay tuned...