[go: up one dir, main page]

Showing posts with label clone wars. Show all posts
Showing posts with label clone wars. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

Clone Wars (The Exorcist): Beyond the Door

The Beyond The Door series is not so much a Series as whatever Films people wanted to make and sell as Sequels.  As you will learn in the coming days, there is not even the remotest of connection in themes between the films, let alone characters or plot.  As a bonus, the 'third film' was released 12 years after the second one!  We're supposed to buy this, why exactly?!?  The first film is a pretty blatant knock-off of The Exorcist.  I could say more, but...that's a pretty good summary, actually.  Let's dive right into...
The film begins in a very odd manner with a shot of a car flying off the side of a California roadway.  Damn you, Toonces!  When you will learn?!?  The shot of the car flying off freezes, however, and we get a droning narration going over it.  Our narrative jumps to that of a young woman going grocery shopping.  The film tries to set her up as 'Mother of the Year' from the get-go by having her go shopping and leaving the kids in the car.  Even in 1974, that was still a bad thing!  Oh and her kids have weird habits that are never really explained.  The boy eats nothing but pea soup (it does not pay off in the way you think), while the girl has several copies of the book 'Love Story' that she reads.  Yes, she has multiple copies of the same book...and it's that one...and she carries them all together.  The father of the kids is a music producer, which is an excuse to give us some padding shots of rehearsal.  Do they add anything?  Nope.  At a dinner party, our heroine learns that she is pregnant and her body is not taking it well.  Oh and she's several weeks ahead of schedule for no reason.  It's probably not a good pregnancy when your baby is growing up super-fast and causing you to vomit blood, is it?  Our heroine acts worried about this for a while and...that's about it for a while.  Let's skip that, shall we?
A mysterious man (Island of the Fishmen's Richard Johnson) keeps wandering around and stalking the husband.  He hears the wife talking about some guy named Dimitri and looks into it.  He was apparently an ex-boyfriend of hers (despite looking 20 years older than her) that was into the occult.  He made some sort of deal with the devil and she's now pregnant with Satan's baby.  That's right- we have merged an Exorcist-clone with a Rosemary's Baby-clone!  That is one ugly, baby!  The woman acts all freaky and talks in the devil voice, while the kids...pretty much vanish from the story.  They are shown a few times, but stop contributing for a while.  See you in the finale, kids.  
As for the man, he is supposed to deliver the child to his dark master and was placed in some sort of spiritual limbo until he did so.  Does it really ever get explained?  No, not really.  We get a whole bunch of scenes of the woman continuing to act freaky, but we never really get a priest character- just some doctor guy.  It's a bit of a letdown, but stay with me.  After some more talking and wandering, the lady/Satan gives a big speech to the doctor.  Immediately following this, we get a juxtaposition of two scenes: the car returning to its falling and the young boy riding on a ferry.  The kid unwraps a toy car and dumps it off the boat, causing the real car to do so...in the past?  The End.
This movie is not...logical.  The flow of it is so odd, spending lots of time on the build-up and just sort of hanging around.  I want to know who writes these odd movies that just sort of linger around and don't go anywhere.  How do you send that in to producers with a straight face?  Twelve pages of tedious dialogue and no direction- they'll love it.  As a horror film, it is a very '70s horror film.  If you like The Exorcist...I would stick with that movie.  It is much better than Seytan and Exorcism (sorry, Paul), but not really all that good as a real movie.  It's interesting...but not much more.  That's about all I can say about it.

Next up, the sequel which...is about a crazy person and ghosts.  Yeah, it's not even related- although it is by Mario Bava.  Stay tuned...

Sunday, August 9, 2009

The Clone Wars (Last House on Left)- Double-Feature!

Last House on the Left is an iconic film, yet, how many of us have actually seen it? We can talk about how daring it was and how it inspired the whole 'revenge movie' genre, even when it was supposed to be debunking it. Or how it is the most violent movie to have an 'anti-violence message.' That's all well and good, but I want to talk about how much it got ripped off. I have two examples for you today, since of them does not bear its own space. Let's start off with...
The plot to this movie is embarrassingly-simple. A trio of men rob a bank in the day-time and flee. Things did not go smoothly, however, and two people in the building were killed. We don't find out by whom until later. As luck (good or bad, depending on who you are) would have it, they hide out at the titular location, only to discover that it is occupied...by a hot nun and her students (read:28yearolds). I guess we can stay for a couple of days.
*
The movie is not completely terrible, but it is quite indecisive. The blond-haired gang leader is always 'playing nice' when the others get a little too grabby. He actually makes them stop fondling one 'girl' under the pretense of them having to leave early the next morning. In the middle of the night, however, two of the men grab the girl and go to have their way with her. When the nun tries to intercede, the 'nice guy' grabs her and makes her watch. So which one is it? He tries to give a speech later saying how he 'never did anything.' The movie, thinking us to be completely dumb, shows scenes from the robbery of him shooting two people juxtaposed against his 'explanation' of the events. Yes, because we clearly trusted him, movie!
*
The ending is alright, though it feels a lot like Thriller aka They Call Her One-Eye. The bad guys all get shot in slow-motion and we are all supposed to feel better. The blond leader goes down really slow though. He gets shotgun-blasted in the chest, but still fights the girls. Who the hell is this guy- Andrew Jackson (look it up)! He gets beaten up with sticks in a very prolonged scene. Movie over yet? Yes. The End.
*
Incidentally, the above movie is the one with the line I quoted in the teaser.
Last House on the Edge of the Park
Despite having such a long, obtuse title, this is actually superior to the other one. Through a long series of events I won't disclose, a macho guy and his 'toady' friend end up at a rich people party. They have some issues with them, however, like the rich guys cheating one of them at cards and one girl being all talk and no action. Naturally, our macho lead decides to hold them hostage and torture them. Yeah, that's a natural escalation. To the movie's credit/detriment, this part makes up most of the movie (roughly one hour and ten minutes). I will give them credit for not 'holding their cards' for too long, but this part does drag a bit since it is so one-sided.
*
So what do we get exactly? One guy gets beaten up and tied to a table, where he spends 80% of the movie. Another- who looks like a cross between Ryan Phillipe in Cruel Intentions and that jerk on Gossip Girl- gets beaten up a lot, even to the point where he should clearly either be dead or nearly dead. One model lady gets her top pulled down a couple of times and yelled at. A brunette is nearly raped by the other guy, but he chickens out. Later, after he says that he doesn't want to hurt her, she does it willingly. Wow, you are coerced easily in barely an hour. The girl who would not put out for our lead is yelled at a lot and is forced to finally 'follow-through' with it. Oh and another girl shows up right at the one hour mark so she can be cut with a straight razor.
*
Why is this movie better? In spite of its masochistic tone, there is a point to it all. In the end, we learn that the whole thing was a set-up. You see, they have a random 'girl gets killed by the villain' scene which feels unnecessary. Later, we learn that the girl is, wait for it, the blond guy's sister. He let him there, made him mad and got attacked so he could eventually get his gun and kill the guy in 'self-defense.' Yeah, it is a weird and obtuse revenge scheme, but even he admits it. The villain gets shot several times- including in his special area- but takes around five minutes straight to die. Also, he barely ever bleeds from his four bullet wounds while in the pool. I guess we should all feel better, right? The End.
*
I will give the latter film credit- I would definitely NOT do a revenge scheme of my own now. Not because of the whole 'cycle of violence' thing. Just because I realize now how hard it is to pull off. Plus, your friends may not like being 'raped for your cause.' They don't elaborate on that part, but I would think that there was some dislike of that guy afterward. So this goes to show you that good, iconic films should be left alone. It's not like anyone would remake this movie...oh wait, they already did. Stay tuned next Halloween for I Spite on Your Grave (2010), I guess.
*
Up next, a film so bizarre that you need to know about it now. Unfortunately, I am out of time. See you tomorrow. Stay tuned...

Thursday, March 19, 2009

The Clone Wars (The Exorcist)- Abby aka The Black Exorcist)

There's another one. Good Lord! 
I mean, Good Pazzuzu.

Today's film is a scarcity because of both its age and a lawsuit. Curious? Too bad, you've read this far already. This is...
What is different:
*The lady is older and black.
*The whole cast is black.
*The priest is played by William Marshall aka 'Blacula'
*It is set in Kentucky.

What is the same:
*Everything else

This is truly separate, but equal film making. Well, actually it is nowhere near equal. This movie sucks really bad. 

To give you a comparison, William Friedkin also made "The French Connection" and "The Sorcerer." Meanwhile, William Girdler is known as the guy who made "Grizzly" and "The Manitou." 

Famous film about car chases and crime or the movie about a woman who has a tumor that grows into an Indian. Choices, choices, choices.

There really is no point to this movie. It's not like "Blacula" which has its own back-story and is not just a black version of "Dracula." 
Hell, even "Blackenstein"- as terrible as it is- has its own story and is a unique entity. This more like "Queen Kong," which simply switches the male roles with female and vice versa.

Any film that was actually marketed as "The Black Exorcist" does not bear any more attention. While there are more of these, it would require me to actually watch them. 

No thanks.

Stay tuned...

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

The Clone Wars (The Exorcist)- Exorcism

Another day, another rip of William Friedkin's classic. Hurray.

Today's film is more subtle in its titling: Exorcism.

The movie is pretty much the same thing as "The Exorcist." Well, there are a couple differences.
-Replace this guy with this guy.
-The whole 'possession' thing is more direct. The young lady was involved in the occult and got possessed. She is not quite the innocent victim.
-The makeup effects are not nearly as scary. She looks more like a zombie.
-There is a whole side-story about how she got possessed. It is more of a distraction than anything.
-They have people get their head twisted around, but it turns out to be a pair of murders by an evil employee. This is not the most original character. Plus, he looks like Mr. Clean

Honestly, I was hoping for a lot more from this movie. The Satanic cult stuff is interesting, but ultimately, just filler. In a way, the film apes The Exorcist too much. As much as people love that movie, the whole first half is pretty dull. This is done to set up the story and contrast the big, shocking finale. This movie does not have that. It has a fairly lame finale, honestly. More importantly, it is just not that funny, scary or full of the usual Naschy bravado. It really feels like cheap, contract work. That's sad.

Coming up next: a rip-off from *gasp* America. Stay tuned...

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

The Clone Wars (The Exorcist)- Seytan

Nations of the world- stop sending us your crappy movies. That is all.

William Friedkin's classic film "The Exorcist" was very popular in its day and has since inspired three- or four, technically- sequels. But, before all of those actual follow-ups came out, everyone and their mother ripped it off. Today's film is one of those:
This film comes to us from the land of Turkey. In the 70s and 80s, they had a booming film industry. As a great documentary by Mondo Macabro (no relation) showed, this died when the economy crashed and most of the films were burned down for the silver the film strips consisted of. Unfortunately, this came too late to stop this movie.

A young girl gets possessed by a demon and her family is not sure how to fix her. They try several ways, but nothing goes too well. They get desperate and, stop me if you have heard this before, call in a priest! They copy every single interesting part of the original "Exorcist" and do it badly. This whole affair is so bad that even the guy doing the subtitle work has given up.

Do anything else other than watching this movie. Hell, read the damn book or something.

Thanks to this site for the pictures, btw.

There are still more of these to come. Stay tuned...