DAILY FILM DOSE: A Daily Film Appreciation and Review Blog: Australian
[go: up one dir, main page]

Showing posts with label Australian. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Australian. Show all posts

Thursday, 8 September 2011

TIFF 2011 - The Eye of the Storm


The Eye of the Storm (2011) dir. Fred Schepisi
Starring: Geoffrey Rush, Charlotte Rampling, Judy Davis

**

By Greg Klymkiw

I have no doubt that Nobel Prize winner Patrick White's novel - which this dreary movie is based on - is not without merit. If, however, Fred (The Chant of Jimmy Blacksmith) Schepisi has rendered a faithful adaptation of it, then it probably ISN'T worth reading. I haven't read it, have you?

What I know for sure is that THE MOVIE itself is most certainly worth avoiding.

For close to two hours we get to watch Charlotte Rampling on her death bed as a rich matriarch making her spoiled children - one of whom is the ubiquitous Geoffrey Rush as a foppish man of the stage - feel like shit.

If your idea of a good time is watching some hag-like harridan spewing vitriol and barking orders, then this is the movie for you.

Don't get me wrong. I'm a sucker for screen harridans. Mind you, I usually prefer them when they're slugging it out with each other in Robert Aldrich melodramas like Whatever Happened to Baby Jane - not dour British-Australian co-ventures we're supposed to take so seriously.

Frankly, the characters in this movie don't appear to resemble a recognizable human being - at least not in most people's world. This is a considerable failing on the part of the film since the duty of all great drama is to give an audience a way INTO the characters - no matter how distant they might be from the experience of many. This doesn't mean we have to like the characters, but we do have to UNDERSTAND them.

The movie would like us to think it's actually about the human condition, but is, in actuality, about the human condition as it relates to dying nasty rich matriarchs in Australia and their insufferable progeny who have expatriated themselves to be as far away from Mommy as possible. There is the stuff of great drama inherent in this, but Schepisi doesn't find it.

With Mom close to horking out her final globs of life, Geoffrey Rush and his pinched, prissy, pretentious sister played by the always welcome Judy Davis (who, in spite of the film, almost makes it worth suffering through) have made the trek from Blighty and Gay Paree respectively to ensure their inheritance will rightfully fall into their laps. We watch as this trio trudge through the turgid drama and seldom feel anything but contempt for all of them and wonder why it is we're being dragged through this sludge at all.

I will say, however, that Ms. Davis is genuinely terrific here. There's a mordant wit to her performance that suggests she's managed to find something in her character beyond what's on the page. Alas, Rampling (one of the finest actresses of all time) manages to hurl her invective professionally and there's certainly a technical proficiency to her descent into dementia, but she's as alone as her character. This might well be the point, but it doesn't make for the most engaging drama. Rush fops about competently, but to not much end.

These three characters feel like they're all in different movies. In a sense, that might also be the point, but it doesn't work as the picture unspools and it's only in retrospect does this occur to you.

One of the more sickening subplots involves Geoffrey Rush having his knob plunged and polished by one of Rampling's caregivers - a comely young thing who (for God knows whatever reason) is genuinely charmed by him and thinks she has a chance to marry into wealth. If the movie wasn't so earnest one could almost take a perverse pleasure in seeing a semi-nude Rush ploughing a fertile young wench.

We are also afforded endless flashbacks via Rampling's dementia. In one of them, she seduces the buff young stud sniffing around Judy Davis. I know this sounds appetizing, but I can assure you it is more than enough to induce major chunk blowing.

Whilst on the topic of ejecting globs of undigested, improperly masticated comestibles, Helen Morse's performance as the Holocaust survivor Lotte is so over-the-top that the character of this former Sally Bowles-like cabaret performer is completely bereft of anything resembling a human being. Perhaps this interpretation was the point, but Morse is theatrical to distraction. The notion of a performer who suffered and survived the indignities of horrendous anti-semitism, now reduced to the role of a housekeeper and recreating numbers from the glory days of pre-war adulation on the stage for her addled dying employer is rife with possibility. One needs to be moved by her desperation, not repulsed by it. She should be a character that commands our empathy. Instead, Morse comes off like a clod-hopping Lotte Lenya. Helen, the last time I checked, the title of this movie is NOT From Russia With Love. Alas, I feel I might be too harsh here. Where, pray tell, was the director?

Every year it seems we get more and more movies like this – dull chamber dramas full of rich, old people with Commonwealth accents who crap on each other (and by extension, us) for two fucking hours and we’re supposed to actually feel something for these miserable, privileged twits. I suppose they keep getting made because there’s always money available for such pictures. They’re relatively cheap to make, attract major actors, carry a veneer of respectability, are often based on acclaimed literary properties and can be directed for a song by filmmakers well past their prime.

And, of course, they get programmed into major international film festivals and dredge up something resembling an audience on television and homevideo.

Kind of like mindless blockbuster action pictures.

At least in those, there’s the possibility that something might actually happen.

The Eye of the Storm is unveiling itself at the 2011 Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF 2011) and will be released via e-one Entertainment.

Friday, 13 May 2011

CANNES 2011 - Sleeping Beauty

Sleeping Beauty (2011) dir. by Julia Leigh
Starring Emily Browning and Rachael Blake

***

By Blair Stewart

Few subjects raise the hackles of cinema-goers quite like a sexual power-play when the woman is the willing submissive, as Julia Leigh's Sleeping Beauty portrays. Arriving from a familiar but far crueler vein to Bunuel's Belle de Jour, young Lucy, as played by Emily Browning, is a striking, almost-pubescent college student with a hazy past of addiction and the trashy roots of the low-class family she's shucked. She's also a trendy bar-bathroom prostitute, earning her keep and dirty knees in the stalls when an offer arrives to join sex games for the contentment of elite men – Berlusconi himself just as well could show up as the master of ceremonies.

Lucy's job offer is that of a 'Sleeping Beauty', a doped-up, unresponsive play doll to be used by old-moneyed hands for any vice 'excluding penetration'. Leigh's film charts the spiral of Lucy's warped sense of curiosity and loathing through this degradation. This is neither a straight drama nor an erotic seduction piece, as the graphic scenes of Browning being pawned by sagging leathery men would corrupt most libidos. Having withheld Lucy's backstory (I'm certain every art-house film withholds backstory these days) and left us with just scraps of dialogue and small twitches of personality indicating why she's chosen her unique, necrophilic field, the work has the quality of an airless art gallery piece, or the political sex-bombs that Catherine Breillat has tossed in the past.

The unconscious transactions with Lucy's clientele have a creeping dread in them helped greatly by the hum of Ben Frost's ambient score. The film itself is pieced together with a minimum number of cuts, or as a fellow critic pointed out, the movie doesn't have scenes as much as vignettes. The framing is classical with brief but soft camera movements, which show us an influence from Michael Haneke's own twisted works.

It's an interesting time for Australian film. Since the productions of the Star Wars prequels and the Matrix films, Hollywood has largely left Oz's shores. Now the homemade independent/arts-funded films have stepped into the spotlight again. At the same time, the films themselves have looked to foreign influences in their themes, with Animal Kingdom sharing a kinship with Michael Mann's L.A. crime swagger, The Proposition an Outback mule-kick that could have been transported to the Rio Grande, and now Sleeping Beauty with the European austerity of ruling-class perversity.

Under the mentorship of Jane Campion, this is the film debut of praised author Julia Leigh. Given the choice of subject matter, attention will likely be focused on the grimy parts of her film. But her star, Emily Browning, a ballsy actress for such a petite woman, and Rachael Blake as Lucy's sangfroid Madam, are both sterling. The film is decisive and unpleasant but also undeniably skillful in its creation, reminding me of the glow of a Francis Bacon painting: both striking and terrible to look at. As you have already gleaned, the American Midwest is surely going to love this.

Wednesday, 4 May 2011

Sweetie

Sweetie (1989) dir. Jane Campion
Starring: Genevieve Lemon, Karen Colston, Tom Lycos, Dorothy Barry

***

By Alan Bacchus

Sweetie is the house guest from hell, the firebrand bi-polar sister of Kay (herself a stressed out basket case) who shows up unwanted at the door of Kay and her boyfriend thus disrupting her attempt at a regular life of independence from her thoroughly messed up family.

Director Jane Campion replaces a precise, forward-moving narrative, a plot which can't be summarized sufficiently in a neat paragraph, with a meandering series of set pieces that sketch out the portrait of Kay and Sweetie’s kooky family. In between the odd comic framing and wackiness, there’s a danger brewing in Sweetie, a violent streak that we sense will erupt in an impending tragedy.

While not the lead, Sweetie earns the status of title character for Lemon’s commanding performance as a bottle full of energy. Her chubby body type and rock and roll attitude and attire threatened to overwhelm everything else. But Campion is smart to bring Sweetie in at the beginning of the second act, concentrating on establishing Kay’s own set of peculiar idiosyncrasies and inhibitions.

This is Jane Campion’s acclaimed first film, a most idiosyncratic effort, quirky but inspired and the sign of a director with a unique voice. It’s a decent start to her career, though the reliance on the show-offy wide angle lenses would later be discarded as a visual tool. Her subsequent films are certainly more rich, textured and emotionally engaging than the off-centre framing and perspective-shifting compositions.

The film’s closest cousin is clearly Holy Smoke, the 1999 Kate Winslet/Harvey Keitel film, which told the story of a cult de-programmer who combats the sexual persuasions of Kate Winslet. We can see striking similarities in the characterizations of the affable family members in both films, as well as the skewed sense of Aussie wit, a funny bone that is conspicuously missing from most of Campion’s other films. Like Holy Smoke, when the action switches from the city to the outback, things get even weirder. We don’t see anything comparable to a crying Harvey Keitel wandering the desert in lipstick and a dress, but Kay’s boyfriend Louis, her off-the-wall father and her mentally-challenged brother are weird enough, not excluding that David Lynch-worthy cowboy dance sequence.

Other connections to Campion’s other work are clearly her female hero Kay and the emotionally damaged Sweetie. Of course, there’s some sex, not the salacious graphic variety of The Piano, but it’s a strong theme that drives much of the conflict.

This viewing comes courtesy of The Criterion Collection Blu-ray, which features two of Campion’s acclaimed short films from the early 80s and other fine goodies, new and old.

Monday, 14 February 2011

Animal Kingdom

Animal Kingdom (2010) dir. David Michôd
Starring: James Frecheville, Joel Edgerton, Guy Pearce, Ben Mendelsohn, Jacki Weaver

***½

By Alan Bacchus

This is the second time seeing Animal Kingdom, now on DVD/Blu, over a year since I first saw it in Sundance. It was a special screening, an inspiring Aussie crime film made with the same auteur-like precision as Michael Mann and Paul Thomas Anderson. Second time round, it feels like a slightly different picture, a slower paced, meditative crime film, but no less enjoyable. It's still not a masterpiece, but an indication that one or two masterpieces will come from this new director.  

Director Michôd wears his influences proudly on his sleeve, the aforementioned Mann and Anderson and even the new crime epic from Jacques Audiard, “A Prophet“. “Animal Kingdom” is an Aussie crime tour de force of its own, an elegant saga worthy of the same breath as these filmmakers and their own great films.

James Frecheville is Joshua ‘J’ Cody, Michod’s Henry Hill, or Michael Corleone or Malik from “A Prophet“, who enters the film wet behind the ears and exits the film a stone cold killer. We first see him watching Aussie game shows on TV while his overdosed mother lies dead on the couch. With nowhere to go he calls up his grandmother to ask what to do. And so J joins up with his estranged family of criminals, who up until then had been kept separate from him by his mother. There are his three uncles, including Baz (Joel Edgerton), the paternal leader, and the lady MacBeth mother of the group J’s grandmother (Jacki Weaver). Later, Pope (Ben Mendelsohn) the most wanted and dangerous member of the family arrives and plots vengeance against the police Armed Robbery Squad which has instigated an all out bloody war against the family.

Though we’re in present day Melbourne, Michôd crafts his world like the lawless west. J, the innocent, is thrown into the deep end of a precarious band of thieves. Under the leadership of Baz, the group is a disciplined family unit, under Pope’s command, he’s like Sonny Corleone leading the family into doom. J’s torn allegiances remind us of Clint Eastwood playing both sides of the gang war in A Fistful of Dollars.

As a first feature Michôd is clear to project his own cinematic style. His character-work seems to channel the films of Michael Mann. His portrayal of his characters as family members first and criminals second has the same natural realism Mann adds to his genre pictures. Even Michôd’s sound work and musical score is reminiscent of Mann’s ambient atmospheric soundscapes. Like Mann, Michôd's music overlaps and bridges scenes an effect which keeps the characters closely tied together.

He would appear to be a fan of Paul Thomas Anderson, who like PTA, is not ashamed to slow down and admire his own work. Michôd consciously lingers closely on his best shots, emphasizing the most minor of moments for heightened dramatic effect. At one point his camera moves around to reveal Pope ogling J’s girlfriend sleeping on the couch. The ironic Air Supply song which plays in the background has no real motivation being there, yet it works as the same kind of dramatic counterpoint as PTA’s firecraker scene set to Sister Christian in ‘Boogie Nights’.

Admirably Michôd props up his admittedly thin narrative for the first two thirds with these extravagances. Under less capable hands these moments would reek of overindulgence, but Michôd's tone is consistently on the mark and thus we can appreciate these cinematic expressions as tools of a great auteur filmmaker.

The characterization of J as a naive teenager, mouth-agape and detached from everything around him is never reconciled. It's the biggest crutch on the film. This aloofness conflicts with the big picture stakes and quells any intensity which is badly needed in the third act. After attending Sundance for the past three year, the problem of pacing always seems to be common denominator with first features. Recently I keep going back to David O Russell's The Fighter when referencing pace, a terrific film which has ebbs and flows in dramatic intensity, comedy, and tragedy - Animal Kingdom has one note (albeit a terrific, pitch perfect note), but something which experience and maturity will correct.

Animal Kingdom is available on DVD and Blu-Ray from EOne Entertainment in Canada

Monday, 25 October 2010

Jindabyne

Jindabyne (2006) dir. Ray Lawrence
Starring: Gabriel Byrne, Laura Linney

***

By Alan Bacchus

Jindabyne is a trainwreck of a film – for the characters, not the film itself. This Aussie sleeper from 2006 tells the story of the gradual destruction of a man’s married life when he innocently discovers the dead body of a girl while on a fishing trip. The film is notable for being one of the Raymond Carver short stories that was included in Robert Altman’s “Short Cuts.” “Jindabyne” is not a remake, but a different vision of a fractured marriage and a racially divided Australian community.

The title refers to the name of a small town in Australia. Stewart is an Irish emigrant living there with his American wife, Claire (Laura Linney) and their young son, Tom. There’s immediately some palpable tension between Stewart and Claire. Some of it stems from the isolation in their adopted home, some from Claire’s meddling mother-in-law. One day Stewart and his three buddies, like in “Deliverance”, take a male-bonding fishing trip. Before they even get to catch a fish Stewart discovers the dead body of young aboriginal girl lying in the river. We, as the audience, recognize this girl from the creepy opening scene when we saw her stalked and kidnapped by a local Aussie hillbilly.

When Stewart returns home, he doesn’t tell his wife until the cops show up at their door in the morning. Claire is shocked at the incident, but even more shocked she was the last to find out. The event causes their rift to increase and further distance themselves from each other. In the news Stewart’s name gets dragged through the mud when it’s revealed they kept fishing after finding the body and didn’t report the death until days later. Because the girl was aboriginal they become the target of anti-white hate crimes from the native community. Claire mourns the death of the young girl in order to cleanse her own soul from the dirt she’s been dragged through by her husband.

Jindabyne” feels like an Andre Dubus (“In the Bedroom“) story. There’s a constant sense of dread that hovers over the film at all times. The fishing trip doesn’t occur until almost 40mins into the film, but director Ray Lawrence teases us with meditative camerawork, quiet dialogue with no music, and slow inquisitive zooms into characters faces to increase the tension. Even after the deathly discovery emotions are kept in check. Eventually Claire and Stewart have it out in one fantastic shouting match. It’s great to watch two great actors face off in an intense cathartic emotional scene.

The film also has a sense of aboriginal mysticism – like God watching over the actions of the white man and punishing them for their desecration of the land and the murdering of their people.

Lawrence crafts some very creepy moments – specifically the little girl’s cruel and almost fatal trick against Stewart’s son in the lake. The mood and atmosphere turn what could have been a 90min film (or even less in the case of “Short Cuts”) into a two-hour seat-squirmer. Since the dialogue is so quiet and soundtrack virtually devoid of music it’s an awkward film to watch and hear. At times I had the volume cranked to the max just to catch an important line of dialogue. Though it’s frustrating, it adds to the thick air of unease Lawrence seems to be an expert at creating.

Most viewers will be turned off by the slow pedantic pace, but with patience you may be reworded with, at the very least, two terrific performances from Laura Linney and Gabriel Byrne. Enjoy.

Friday, 13 August 2010

Animal Kingdom (Reece's review)

Animal Kingdom' (2010) dir. David Michôd
Starring: Joel Edgerton, James Frecheville, Guy Pearce, Jacki Weaver, Ben Mendelsohn

***

By Reece Crothers

Though it loses some of it's magic for a too long in the second half half of the picture, the debut feature from Australian writer/director David Michôd earns much of it's star rating from the spell cast by the early scenes which feature a brood of criminals living in the suburbs like something out of the wild west, the James gang plucked out of history and dropped into modern life. Animal Kingdom is the story of the Cody family's demise through the eyes of it's most estranged member, played by newcomer James Frecheville. The Darwin metaphor is self-explanatory.

Frecheville is 'J' whose junkie mother has overdosed and died and left the teen with nowhere else to go. He calls his grandmother, Janine, and we get the sense that they have been apart for a very long time. But Janine is sweet and will take 'J' in. And so we meet the rest of the family. There is Jackie Weaver (from Peter Weir's Picnic At Hanging Rock) giving a beautifully nuanced performance as matriarch Janine, and her two hunky scruffy sons Barry (played by Joel Edgerton from "The Square") and Craig (Sullivan Stapleton from TVs "Neighbours"). We also meet Jackie's youngest boy Darren, (Luke Ford - a movie star name if ever there was one) who is so close to 'J's age that he instructs him not to call him "uncle" Darren because it creeps him out. Barry is the de-facto man of the house and has a beautiful wife, seems to be looking out for everybody and will look out for 'J' too. We wonder how a family like this could have grown apart, though there is a red flag when grandma Janine seems to enjoy kissing her sons in greeting a little too much, but for a moment it seems like 'J' has found the stable family that he has been missing his whole life. It is a world apart from living in motels with his junkie mom.

Then we meet Jackie's eldest boy, Andrew, nicknamed "Pope", and the crack in the facade shatters completely. Did I forget to mention that the family robs banks? They're like the family version of the Ex-Presidents from Point Break - charismatic, sexy, and dangerous. Pope is a psychopath, wonderfully underplayed by Ben Mendelsohn. It is the kind of character that attracts the worst of over-acting, but neither the finely drawn script, or the subtle direction, or Mendelsohn's quiet authoritative performance hits a wrong note here.

It is the ordinary presentation of the world and the character's in it that makes the film feel so gritty. It feels real. Where the director applies the greatest amount of stylization is in the atmospheric sound design. The film sounds great. The attention to audio detail here reminds me of Paul Thomas Anderson's movies, and much like that filmmaker's debut, "Sydney" (or "Hard Eight" as it was renamed by the studio), the film feels like it is announcing a great director who is still finding his voice. The film is so good that you want it to be great. But there is a major structural problem that I cannot reveal without spoiling the plot. I think the writer/director outsmarted himself.

Because it is the story of a family's demise, characters start dying. I don't want to say who, but I will say that when the carnage starts it actually made me jump in my seat. Few films do that anymore. The problem is the second half of the picture starts to feel a little empty. You start to miss characters who aren't around anymore. I like passive protagonists so long as they are surrounded by more outrageous companions. Like Ewan McGregor's Renton in "Trainspotting", who is much less active a character than say, Begbie, or Sickboy, or even Spud. Their quiet, observer character give us an anchor in their universes. Take away Begbie, Sickboy and Spud and Renton is a real bore. As is the case here. Without the dynamic characters surrounding him, whether because they've been killed, or arrested, or he has simply alienated himself from them in other ways I don't want to give away, Frecheville's character's passivity started to wear me down and for a few minutes I was checking my watch. But not for long. The picture has a terrific ending.

If it's not exactly a classic, it is a very good picture, a worthy entry into the crime genre canon - a stylish, serious, drama about as good as Sean Penn's 1990 Irish-mob-in-New-York flick, "State Of Grace", and offers the promise that Michôd's next next film might just be a "Boogie Nights".

Animal Kingdom (Greg's review)


Animal Kingdom (2010) dir. David Michôd
Starring: James Frecheville, Jacki Weaver, Ben Mendelsohn, Sullivan Stapleton, Luke Ford and Guy Pearce

***

By Greg Klymkiw

Here's the recipe for this stunning (though flawed) new crime picture: Goodfellas (on lithium), with a few dashes of Mean Streets and Who's That Knocking At My Door?, a whole lotta Bloody Mama (sans Shelley Winters and re-imagined in a contemporary Melbourne), a poker face to rival Buster Keaton (in the form of brilliant lead actor James Frecheville), and, given its setting, cool wall-to-wall Aussie accents.

It's a fine recipe and the end result goes down real good. In fact, this might be one of the best crime pictures I've seen in quite awhile. It grabs you by the testes (or, for those without 'em, the klafte) and it seldom lets go.

We're introduced to young Josh (the aforementioned Frecheville) who blankly watches television as his Mom, stone cold dead from a heroin overdose, is piled into an ambulance. Not quite knowing what to do, he telephones his Grandmother, the insanely nicknamed - I kid you not - Smurf (Jacki Weaver). Josh's late Mom made a conscious decision to shelter him, and quite possibly herself, from Mama Smurf and her mad sons - they're criminals: cheap, petty and violent.

Young Josh has, no doubt, inspired his heroin-infused Mom's corpse to churn eternally in her grave as he gradually begins to ease into his "new" family and their "business" quite nicely. Smurf's sonny-jims include the handsome, brutal, overtly magma-headed Craig (Sullivan Stapleton), the quiet reluctant criminal Darren (Luke Ford) and the undeniably charismatic and thoroughly bonkers Pope (Ben Mendelsohn). Pope is especially dangerous. He refuses to take his meds and because of this, he's no stereotypical nutter, but the kind who seems almost sane - "almost" being the operative word.

Things slowly and creepily unravel for this family that loves crime even more than each other. Against the banal backdrop of their middle class surroundings and aspirations, things don't rush to an inevitable conclusion, they crawl - inch by inch by inch. The pacing and tone of the picture is so strangely, uniquely measured, it's a shame that the engrossing narrative eventually leads to a series of cliched double-crosses and revenge.

In spite of the failings of the narrative (which is not bad, just a bit too familiar and predictable) director David Michôd is clearly a born filmmaker. As much of the movie takes place within the drab middle class home of the criminals, his shot compositions are endlessly exquisite and his blocking of the action is first-rate. There isn't a single bad performance in the whole picture (though Guy Pearce as a cop seems a touch uncomfortable in role) and the astounding revelation is just how great an actress Jacki Weaver is. Granted, she is a stalwart of Australian cinema, but her performance here is so deliciously smarmy and alternately loving that she will surely be a contender for a myriad of acting awards.

According to Princeton University's online lexical database of English, the definition of "animal kingdom" is a "taxonomic kingdom comprising all living or extinct animals". This, of course, is one of the many reasons the picture is so good, Its exploration of a crime family in a careful, measured fashion is not unlike classifying a particular species and its daily habits. This is done so well for the first two-thirds of the picture, one can almost forgive its narrative shortcomings in the last third.

Animal Kingdom isn't a perfect descent into petty crime, but it's a compelling one.

Sunday, 1 August 2010

Samson and Delilah

Samson and Delilah (2009) dir. Warwick Thornton
Starring Rowan McNamara and Marissa Gibson

***

By Blair Stewart

In the godforsaken terrain of the Australia's Northern Territories a young Aborigine couple form a rickety bond as they flee the reservation. The surroundings of the Outback are equal in its cruelty to the circumstances of Samson (Rowan McNamara) and Delilah's (Marissa Gibson) off-kilter courtship as they stagger into adulthood. A near-mute love is possible for them despite the boy being blasted out of his skull on gas fumes while the girl cares for her brittle matchmaker of a granny.

Soon fleeing their dismal community for Alice Springs the young lovers suffer hardship in the strangeness of the white man's land. They'll be reduced to living under a highway bridge as challenges faced by the couple both within and outside of their grasp are often more appropriate for that other biblical subject Job.

An Australian award-magnet by novice director Warwick Thornton, "Samson and Delilah" is something I would classify as being critic-proof (young talented director + little-known foreign culture + a few tragedies + unknown actors= 100% rating on Rotten Tomatoes) that succeeds despite some contrivances. The acting by McNamara and Gibson is certainly lovely for roles that require them to work almost exclusively only with their eyes, and this debut feature would have failed without their ability to do so. If non-existent dialogue and stories told in repetitive motifs aren't your bag, you should avoid it.

I also had the niggling sense of seeing this film before, as if some of the Dardennes and Ken Loach's sensibilities had recently snuck down south. Despite these qualms, Thornton's skill as both a director and cameraman are apparent in the beauty of his cherubic main subjects against the cauterized expanse.

"Samson and Delilah" doesn't shy away from the generations of punches the Aborigines of Oz (and other parts of the New World) have rolled with in the guise of these two kids, and if this is the early results of a new generation in native cinema, the future is bright.

Sunday, 25 July 2010

Love the Beast

Love the Beast (2009) dir. Eric Bana
Documentary

**1/2

By Alan Bacchus

Before Eric Bana became famous for either his stand up comedy in Australia or his film work in Hollywood, he was a suburban gear head who loved muscle cars. Well, just one car in particular, his own car, a 1974 Ford XB Falcon Hardtop, the same car that (ahem) Mel Gibson rode in Mad Max. 25 years later, now that he’s famous enough and has the clout to make a personal film and himself and his car, this documentary is birthed.

After establishing the background to Bana’s upbringing in Australia and the source of his love for cars the film moves into the structural coat hanger of the story, that is Bana’s participation in a 5 day rally race through Tasmania. Some decent race footage and some genuine speed demon thrills make this section of the film watchable. But the repetitiveness of the message smells just like burning rubber.

Helping to analyze or support Bana is fellow car freak Jay Leno, some British TV personality named Jeremy Clarkson and Dr. Phil McGraw. Dr. Phil makes some thoughtful analysis of Bana’s obsessions, but Jay Leno makes only one joke in the film, otherwise staying as straight-faced as his post Conan debacle interview on Oprah, once again proving that he just isn’t funny at all.

Save for a brief scene on the red carpet premiere of his film ‘Lucky Numbers’ there’s no inward look at Bana’s celebrity and the effect of his career on his obsession with cars. It’s a shame, because why else would we care about someone else’s car unless it was a celebrity’s? The problem lies with the fact that Bana himself is the producer and director and thus unable to provide a true third person perspective on his own life.

Early on one of Bana’s interviewees explains to us how ‘non-car’ people can’t understand why ‘car-people’ can have a genuine relationship to an automobile, which, as non-car person, also explains my thoughts on this film. There isn’t much else going on thematically in Love the Beast that isn’t on the surface or told to us over and over again. Eric loves his car and we should all love it too – not all that fascinating, interesting or thought-provoking unless you’re a gear head like Bana and his mates.

Normally I hate the idea of having a director’s commentary on a documentary, after all, wasn’t the documentary the commentary? But in this case, Bana’s second hand ruminations on the film, the subjects, his cars, his celebrity life greatly enhance the film. Also included on the DVDs are lengthier but forgettable interviews with Bana and Clarkson, as well as a trailer, featuring the awesome Band of Horses song, Is There a Ghost, which unfortunately isn’t featured in the film.


Tuesday, 11 May 2010

The Square

The Square (2010) dir. Nash Edgerton
Starring: David Roberts, Claire van der Boom, Joel Edgerton, Anthony Hayes

***

By Alan Bacchus

A lot has been made of Nash Edgerton’s directorial debut – a neo noir of the ‘Blood Simple’, ‘Bound’, ‘Red Rock West’ persuasion. While 'The Square' is a good film though not quite hitting the high water mark of those films, if anything, the film has a greater significance as the forerunner for an exciting new movement in Australian cinema.

Not many people are talking about it yet, but there’s a germ of a New Wave percolating down under – a group of filmmakers who, over the last 10 years, have been making short films together under the prodco name Blue Tongue Films, of which Nash Edgerton is one. Among the other filmmakers there’s David Michôd, Stephen Susser and Nash’s brother Joel Edgerton.

So far 2010 has been Annus Mirabilis for these lads – David Michôd, arguably showing the most promise with his stunning Sundance festival crime epic ‘Animal Kingdom’ which reminds us of the early bravura work of Paul Thomas Anderson. Spencer Susser’s first film co-written by Michôd, ‘Hesher’, is a lesser work, but shows the same kind Aussie toughness in both ‘The Square’ and ‘Animal Kingdom’. Joel, primarily an actor, has been doing some great character work over the past 10 years, notably in ‘Ned Kelly’, ‘Kinky Boots’, ‘King Arthur’, ‘Smoking Aces’ and the upcoming ‘The Thing’ sequel. He’s also a director and his acclaimed short film, ‘the List’ shows the same style in streetwise cinema as his other colleagues.

But back to the ‘The Square’, it’s a classic neo noir setup – an ordinary everyman finding himself caught up in a high stakes of world of crime. Raymond Yale is a real estate developer working on a new public works project. It’s a stressful job which perhaps is the reason why he’s taken up an extra-marital affair with a neighbour, Carla. They appear to love each other, with Carla holding out for Raymond to end his marriage with his wife. Carla, though is still in a relationship with her petty criminal boyfriend, Greg, and when he comes home with a bag full of cash, Carla sees it as an opportunity to free herself Raymond from their former lives and start all over somewhere, together.

So there’s the classic nourish inciting incident – the temptation of ordinary people by money, greed and lust. In order to satisfy these desires Carla and Raymond have to dip their toes into a complex web of crime and violence. Raymond hires petty thief Billy to steal the bag, burn down their house as a rouse for the stolen money. But as Robert Burns once wrote, ‘the best laid plans of mice and men oft go awry’. Such is the case with Robert. When Greg's house burns down, so does his elderly grandmother. And when Greg smells foul play it doesn't take long before Raymond finds himself scrambling to cover up his tracks – a series of events and mistakes which will result in a tragedy of dramatic proportions.

While no new ground is broken in the genre what Edgerton does best is keeps the pressure cooker on high for virtually the entire movie. As a good screenwriter he puts his character into situations where he’s forced to make a number of decisions with the stakes rising with each choice. His first decision to start up an affair is made before the movie starts, so he’s already below the line of moral decency. His second decision involves stealing Greg’s money and burning his house down. Though Carla isn’t a prototypical femme fatale, Edgerton smartly makes her incitement of this choice. There’s a murder and its subsequent cover up midway through which puts Raymond further down into moral abyss, from which he struggles to climb out of for the rest of the picture and which will ultimately become his downfall.

In addition to the coming out party for Edgerton’s and his Blue Tongue Films gang, his cast of actors rip and roll with each other like a well-oiled machine as many of the key players have been involved with short films as well. There’s no one I’d fear more than a brazen Aussie thug. And Edgerton maximizes this ingrained culture of toughness in Aussie males. Edgerton dramatizes his world of crime with these types of characters in all corners of his picture. His other Blue Tongue Films colleagues appear to be doing the same as well.

Don’t forget to check out ‘Animal Kingdom’ when it gets a release later this year.

Here's trailer for The Square



Here's a trailer of Animal Kingdom

Monday, 25 January 2010

Sundance 2010 - ANIMAL KINGDOM

Animal Kingdom (2010) dir. David Michod
Starring: James Frecheville, Joel Edgerton, Guy Pearce, Ben Mendelsohn, Jacki Weaver

***½

By Alan Bacchus

With “Animal Kingdom’ the debut feature from Aussie director David Michod, we are bear witness to one of the most exciting new voices in masculine-fueled muscular cinema.

Michod wears his influences proudly on his sleeve, from Michael Mann to Paul Thomas Anderson and even the new crime masterpiece from Jacques Audiard, “A Prophet“. “Animal Kingdom” is an Aussie crime tour de force of its own, an elegant saga worthy of the same breath as these filmmakers and their own great films.

James Frecheville is Joshua ‘J’ Cody, Michod’s Henry Hill, or Michael Corleone or Malik from “A Prophet“, who enters the film wet behind the ears and exits the film a stone cold killer. We first see him watching Aussie game shows on TV while his overdosed mother lies dead on the couch. With nowhere to go he calls up his grandmother to ask what to do. And so J joins up with his estranged family of criminals, who up until then had been kept separate from him by his mother. There are his three uncles, including Baz (Joel Edgerton), the paternal leader, and the lady MacBeth mother of the group J’s grandmother (Jacki Weaver). Later, Pope (Ben Mendelsohn) the most wanted and dangerous member of the family arrives and plots vengeance against the police Armed Robbery Squad which has instigated an all out bloody war against the family.

Though we’re in present day Melbourne, Michod crafts his world like the lawless west. J, the innocent, is thrown into the deep end of a precarious band of thieves. Under the leadership of Baz, the group is a disciplined family unit, under Pope’s command, he’s like Sonny Corleone leading the family into doom. J’s torn allegiances remind us of Clint Eastwood playing both sides of the gang war in Fistful of Dollars. But Michod arguably wrings out even more tension, because only we the audience are aware of the double crosses on the horizon.

As a first feature Michod is clear to project a muscular cinematic style. More specifically he’s channelling the auteur crime work of Michael Mann. His portrayal of his characters as family members first and criminals second has the same natural realism Mann adds to his genre pictures. Even Michod’s sound work and musical score is reminiscent of Mann’s ambient atmospheric soundscapes. Like Mann, Michod’s music overlaps and bridges scenes an effect which keeps the characters closely tied together.

He would appear to be a fan of Paul Thomas Anderson, who like PTA, is not ashamed to slow down and admire his own work. Michod consciously lingers closely on his best shots, emphasizing the most minor of moments for heightened dramatic effect. At one point his camera moves around to reveal Pope ogling J’s girlfriend sleeping on the couch. The ironic Air Supply song which plays in the background has no real motivation being there, yet it works as the same kind of dramatic counterpoint as PTA’s firecraker scene set to Sister Christian in ‘Boogie Nights’.

Admirably Michod’s props up his admittedly thin narrative for the first two thirds with these extravagances. Under less capable hands these moments would reek of overindulgence, but Michod’s tone is consistently on the mark and thus we can appreciate these cinematic expressions as tools of a great auteur filmmaker.

‘Animal Kingdom’ is not perfect and works best as a great debut feature, the announcement of a new filmmaker to be excited about. Arguably the picture tends to sputter in the third act, but Michod admirably keeps his film under two hours, though I doubt the same will be said of his next film.

Saturday, 19 September 2009

TIFF 2009: Wake In Fright

Wake in Fright – also known as: Outback (1971) Dir. Ted Kotcheff
Starring: Donald Pleasance, Gary Bond, Chips Rafferty, Al Thomas, Jack Thompson, Peter Whittle and Sylvia Kay

****

Guest Review by Greg Klymkiw

It seems unthinkable in this day and age of film preservation and restoration that a motion picture classic made – not during the silent period of the early 20th century, but in 1971, a Cannes Palme D’Or nominee no less, and often cited (along with Nicholas Roeg’s “Walkabout” from the same year) as the beginning of Australia’s revitalization as a filmmaking force – was one week away from having all of its original negative elements destroyed. After a two-year search all over the world at his own expense, the film’s editor Anthony Buckley finally discovered the elements in the bowels of the CBS vaults in Pittsburgh (no less) in a pile of items marked to be “junked” (industry parlance for “destroyed”) and, I reiterate, ONE WEEK from the date he found them.

Because of his Herculean efforts as well as the frame-by-frame restoration by the National Film and Sound Archives of Australia and Deluxe Labs, Ted Kotcheff’s “Wake in Fright” (released outside of Australia as “Outback”) has a new lease on life – to shock and mesmerize audiences all over the world. Screened at Cannes in May of 2009 (only one of two features ever to be screened on two separate occasions at Cannes) and in a special presentation featuring Kotcheff in a personal dialogue on the film at the 2009 Toronto International Film Festival, “Wake in Fright” stands as one of the most powerful explorations of male savagery in the context of a topography that seems as rugged and barren as the surface of the Moon. In a world of Samuel Fuller and Sam Peckinpah, Kotcheff’s brilliant film holds its own.

I first saw the movie when I was about 13 or 14 years old as “Outback” during a late night showing on the CBC (Canadian Broadcast Corporation) when, during this time, Canadian content guidelines allowed for the broadcast of ANY film that came from Britain’s Commonwealth to meet said guidelines. (Because of this, we saw some really fine movies and TV series during the 60s and 70s.) It was a movie that completely bewildered and obsessed me. Even a full frame standard telecine transfer did not detract from its strangeness, its terrible and terrifying beauty and its depiction of a world so foreign to my own, yet seeming to be imbued with a quality that suggested to me, even then, that what I was seeing was the stuff of life itself. For over thirty years I looked and waited, seemingly in vain, to see it again. To think I almost didn’t have that opportunity because of the aforementioned disappearance and death sentence is now, after seeing it again much older and (hopefully) wiser (on a big screen in a pristine, lovingly restored 35mm print), makes me feel like I have been witness to a miracle.

And what a miracle this movie is! Kotcheff, the Canadian born, raised and trained director (trained via and not unlike Norman Jewison, within the legendary CBC television drama department of the late 50s and early 60s), has made his fair share of good pictures – most notably the Berlin Golden Bear Award winner “The Apprenticeship of Duddy Kravitz”, the droll “Who is Killing the Great Chefs of Europe?” and the first and best Rambo picture “First Blood” – but nothing in his canon comes close to the mind boggling perfection of “Wake in Fright”.

Stunningly photographed by Brian West, the picture opens on one spot of the desolation that is the outback of Australia and the camera proceeds to do a slow 360 degree turn – shocking us with the reality that the land is the same whichever direction one looks and that it seems to go on forever. Into this environment we’re introduced to the impeccably groomed and fussily attired schoolteacher John Grant (Gary Bond) who is about to leave the two-building rail town for a much-needed vacation to Sydney. Grant describes his position as being enslaved to the Ministry of Education as they have required all new teachers to post a one-thousand-dollar bond to ensure they serve their entire first term in the most desolate postings imaginable. During a stopover in the bleak mining town of Bundanyabba, Grant meets Jock (played by legendary Aussie actor Chips Rafferty), an amiable policeman who plies him with beer and gets him into a card game where he loses all of his money. Stranded, perpetually drunk and eventually and brain-numbingly hung-over, Grant is hosted by a motley crew of locals (several hard drinking macho men and one extremely horny single female) who proceed to take him into the very heart of the Australian darkness. Grant is practically force-fed steady supplies of beer, seduced by the lonely woman (which is scuttled when he pukes while trying to penetrate her), taken on a mad, drunken and vicious kangaroo hunt and finally locked in a sweaty, smelly and almost violently homoerotic coupling with the mad alcoholic doctor Tydon (a malevolent Donald Pleasance).

At first, we are shown a passive observer, but as the film progresses, he regresses to the same savage state as the men he initially holds his nose up to and he decidedly and actively engages in acts so barbaric that he is forced to confront his inner demons to the point where he is sickened to the point of contemplating suicide.

Not unlike the world of playwrights Eugene O’Neill and Edward Albee, we find ourselves in the realm of alcohol-fueled depravity and game playing. Like any respectable Walpurgisnacht, booze is sloshed into empty cups with abandon and full cups are drained greedily, but these pagans who celebrate ARE the tortured spirits walking amongst the living and any bonfires they create seemed to be aimed squarely at themselves. Furthermore, the movie presents a “Paradise Lost” situation where depravity is merely presented and much like John Milton’s “hero”, Grant makes a conscious choice to immerse himself in the foul macho shenanigans like a pig in shit.

This is one daring, nasty piece of work and without question, the movie Kotcheff will ultimately be best remembered for. He not only elicits fine performances from a stellar cast, but his mise-en-scene is pretty much perfect. It’s also no coincidence that he is Canadian and perhaps the perfect director outside of Australia to have tackled this story so rooted in that nation’s pathology. Given that the vast majority of Canada’s population resides within 100 kms along the Canadian and U.S. border, the rest of this vast country north of the 49th parallel is not unlike the world of the Australian outback. (To all non-Canadians: just think of a land populated by SCTV’s hosers Bob and Doug McKenzie – seemingly benign, but below the simpleton surface, a roiling, frustrated, angry, bitter nation of moose-hunting psychopaths.)

As well, it is no surprise that it was Anthony Buckley, the editor of the film, who searched high and low for the lost negative elements, since the cutting in this picture has few equals. For the most part, things are delivered at a steady, unobtrusive pace, but when we’re in the territory of dreams or overtly physical action, the editing veers from measured to positively Eisensteinian. At times, the action borders on the hypnotic, while at other points, it’s as jarring and disturbing as the images and action engaged in by the characters.

This action, as designed by director Kotcheff, is expertly blocked. His shot choices are impeccable and most importantly, he seems perfectly at home in capturing the claustrophobic nature of both barren exteriors and interiors – where the only way to break free is to rage against the dying of the light that has, for the characters who populate this world, become life itself.

This picture rages, alright! It’s one hell of a ride and we’re all the better for it.

Friday, 21 September 2007

JYNDABYNE


Jindabyne (2006) dir. Ray Lawrence
Starring: Gabriel Byrne, Laura Linney

***

Jindabyne is a trainwreck of a film – for the characters, not the film itself. It tells the story of the gradual destruction of a man’s married life when he innocently discovers the dead body of a girl while on a fishing trip. The film is notable for being one of the Raymond Carver short stories that was included in Robert Altman’s “Short Cuts.” “Jindabyne” is not a remake, but a different vision of a fractured marriage and a racially divided Australian community.

“Jindabyne” is the name of small town in Australia. Stewart is an Irish emigrant living there with his American wife, Claire (Laura Linney) and their young son, Tom. There’s immediately some palpable tension between Stewart and Claire. Some of it stems from the isolation in their adopted home, some from Claire’s meddling mother-in-law. One day Stewart and his three buddies, like in “Deliverance”, take a male-bonding fishing trip. Before they even get to catch a fish Stewart discovers the dead body of young aboriginal girl lying in the river. We, as the audience, recognize this girl from the creepy opening scene when we saw her stalked and kidnapped by a local Aussie hillbilly.

When Stewart returns home, he doesn’t tell his wife until the cops show up at their door in the morning. Claire is shocked at the incident, but even more shocked she was the last to find out. The event causes their rift to increase and further distance themselves from each other. In the news Stewart’s name gets dragged through the mud when it’s revealed they kept fishing after finding the body and didn’t report the death until days later. Because the girl was aboriginal they become the target of anti-white hate crimes from the native community. Claire mourns the death of the young girl in order to cleanse her own soul from the dirt she’s been dragged through by her husband.

“Jindabyne” feels like an Andre Dubus (“In the Bedroom“) story. There’s a constant sense of dread that hovers over the film at all times. The fishing trip doesn’t occur until almost 40mins into the film, but director Ray Lawrence teases us with meditative camerawork, quiet dialogue with no music, and slow inquisitive zooms into characters faces to increase the tension. Even after the deathly discovery emotions are kept in check. Eventually Claire and Stewart have it out in one fantastic shouting match. It’s great to watch two great actors face off in an intense cathartic emotional scene.

The film also has a sense of aboriginal mysticism – like God watching over the actions of the white man and punishing them for their desecration of the land and the murdering of their people.

Lawrence crafts some very creepy moments – specifically the little girl’s cruel and almost fatal trick against Stewart’s son in the lake. The mood and atmosphere turn what could have been a 90min film (or even less in the case of “Short Cuts”) into a two-hour seat-squirmer. Since the dialogue is so quiet and soundtrack virtually devoid of music it’s an awkward film to watch and hear. At times I had the volume cranked to the max just to catch an important line of dialogue. Though it’s frustrating, it adds to the thick air of unease Lawrence seems to be an expert at creating.

Most viewers will be turned off by the slow pedantic pace, but with patience you may be reworded with, at the very least, two terrific performances from Laura Linney and Gabriel Byrne. Enjoy.

Buy it here: Jindabyne

Wednesday, 5 September 2007

THE ROAD WARRIOR


The Road Warrior (1981) dir. George Miller
Starring: Mel Gibson, Bruce Spence

****

“Two days ago, I saw a vehicle that would haul that tanker. You want to get out of here? You talk to me

In 1981 Steven Spielberg’s “Raiders of the Lost Ark” and George Miller’s “The Road Warrior” were released. Both films have a kinship of grandiose childlike cinematic action and are the best examples of the highest quality of adventure cinema. George Miller’s film takes the character he created in 1979’s “Mad Max” and places him in a new world, a post-Apocalyptic outback – a dangerous land where gangs fight to survive after all semblance of government and authority has been wiped out. “The Road Warrior” was so creative, so exuberant, so much fun to watch it stands the test of time as one of the great action films and ranks right up beside Spielberg’s “Raiders of the Lost Ark.”

Max is the prototypical anti-hero, a former policeman whose wife and child were brutal murdered by a brutal gang of hooligans. Max now lives in a world of hooligans. He remains a loner, an anti-hero outcast, with only his car, his shotgun and his dog as his possessions. His sole purpose in life is to find more gasoline so he can drive farther and farther away from civilization and distance himself from his own personal demons.

A piece of narration opens the film over a montage of images summarizing the time and place. (Note: the Australian version did not use this prologue). The near future world has gone through nuclear war, most of the land is barren and most forms of social civilization have been destroyed. The currency of this new world is gasoline, and the opening action sequence shows what lengths people are willing to go to get the ‘petrol’. Just like the first “Mad Max” George Miller opens with a brilliant car chase set piece. Max is super bad-ass and outsmarts and out drives the gang, led by a motorcycle-riding apocalyptic punk with his chained homosexual boy slave. After the incident Max escapes a trap set by a helicopter pilot named gyro (Bruce Spence). Before he’s about to be killed he tells Max about a tanker filled with gallons and gallons of gas. Max and the pilot enter into a unique partnership that will continue over the next two films.

Max is led to a commune of white-clad idealists who continually fight off a horde of maniacal warriors. Max makes a deal with the group to drive the tanker out of the compound and through the gang’s attack so they can escape to a civilized oasis thousands of miles away.

The visual design of Miller’s wasteland Australia is one of the highlights. Made in 1981, the costumes, props, vehicles and nihilist attitude reflect the punk culture of the day. Though different in genre it has much in common with “Blade Runner”, “Brazil” and “1984”. It’s a makeshift world created from the destroyed elements of a broken society. The film also has strong elements of the Western and Samurai genres – a lawless society and an unscrupulous lone reluctant hero hired to protect the innocents.

The other highlight are the tremendous chase sequences which stands up to anything done today. Miller edits his perfectly framed camera angles to accentuate the speed, intensity and danger of the chase. And amid all the crashes, explosions, ass-less chaps, and feral children is the tragic but noble heart of Max that he just can’t turn off.

Steven Spielberg and George Miller have a lot in common. They are both natural born filmmakers with both an accomplished technical acumen and an instinctual ability to entertain their audience. “The Road Warrior” will never cease to kick ass. Enjoy.

P.S. Spielberg himself saw the commonality of their work and hired Miller to direct the final (and best) chapter of “Twilight Zone: The Movie” (1983).

Buy it here: The Road Warrior


Sunday, 19 August 2007

THE PROPOSITION


The Proposition (2005) dir. John Hillcoat
Starring: Guy Pearce, Ray Winstone, Danny Huston, Emily Watson

***1/2

“The Proposition” is an Aussie Western written by new wave punk rocker Nick Cave. It’s a beautifully crafted film telling a familiar western tale from the Australian point of view of their sordid history and association with British imperialism. It’s a story of a British officer who puts his job before his family in the idealistic hope of civilizing the lawless Australian outback. The story is simple, but it’s theme of betrayal and revenge is classical giving the film a resonating mythical quality.

The opening reminds me of “Days of Heaven” – still photographs of the era with a quiet melancholy soundtrack over the main credits. It sets the time, place and mood of the film perfectly. The inciting incident happens before the film starts. A well-respected family is brutally murdered by a particularly brutal gang led by the sadistic maniac Arthur Burns (Danny Huston). After a Peckinpah-worthy shootout Lawman Captain Stanley (Ray Winstone) captures Burns’ two brothers Charlie (Guy Pearce) and Mikey (Richard Wilson). Stanley makes a proposition to Charlie – to find and kill his older brother Arthur in the nine days before Christmas, or he will kill his younger brother Mikey. Charlie accepts the proposition and sets out to find his long lost brother.

Though Guy Pearce’s character is structured as the main protagonist, the complexities of the film lay with Captain Stanley. His dedication to the law and the land compromises his family as husband to his beautiful and refined wife, Martha (Emma Watson). But Stanley has convictions about his role in Australia. His commitment to his job is fed by his desire to provide a peaceful home for Martha - thus his need to “civilize” the land. We discover the ramifications of his ‘proposition’ when his superior Eden Fletcher (David Wenham) arrives in town. When he finds Mikey Burns in custody, he orders a 40 lash flogging as punishment for the Hopkins massacre. With his word broken Stanley knows Arthur and Charlie will soon go after he and Martha – therefore his proposition effectively becomes his own death sentence.

Cave and Hillcoat effectively build up the Arthur Burns character to be a Kaiser Sose/Col Kurtz-type larger-than-life antagonist. We don’t meet him until the second act, but the stories told about him and the legends portray him as a spirit or a legend. The aborigines describe him as part man, part dog, with long ears and a tale. When we finally meet him, he doesn’t disappoint. He’s aloof but sadistic. He speaks with calm eloquence, but his actions are maniacal and vicious. Likely inspired by Brando’s Col. Kurtz in “Apocalypse Now”, Danny Huston plays him to perfection.

Nick Cave’s ethereal buzzing music soundscapes add to the Australianness of the film. There’s strong sense of aborigine spirituality throughout the film that give it A “Walkabout” or “Picnic at Hanging Rock”-type feel.

The film builds and builds to a violent cathartic ending. The Charlie and Arthur ride off to rescue brother Mikey and avenge his beating, meanwhile Captain Stanley and his wife try to have a peaceful Christmas - a soon-to-be tragically ironic occasion.

Have some patience with the film and pay attention to the quiet dialogue, which is sometimes difficult to understand. It’s all fuel for this violent but beautiful layered genre gem. Enjoy

Buy it here: The Proposition


Sunday, 11 March 2007

THE QUIET EARTH


The Quiet Earth (1985) dir. Geoff Murphy
Starring, Bruno Lawrence, Allison Routledge, Peter Smith

***1/2

“The Quiet Earth” is a largely forgotten-about New Zealand sci-fi film from the 80’s. The premise is the frequent ‘what-if’ scenario of science fiction - what would you do if you were the last man on earth?

This question has sparked a whole subgenre of sci-fe ie. “The Omega Man,” “28 Days Later,” “several Twilight Zone episodes, and “The Stand”. Of course, it was Richard Mathieson’s seminal novel “I am Legend” that spawned all these interpretations – we’ll see how the Will Smith version of turns out…

A stark naked man, Zac (played by Bruno Lawrence) wakes up in his bed and goes about his everyday routine. Making coffee, showering, breakfast, his morning commute. Soon he realizes there’s no one else around. It’s as if people literally disappeared in a split second, there’s no dead bodies, cars are left derelict on the streets, a plane has crashed to the ground, a baby carriage left empty, a gas station washroom is left locked and occupied. Everything else in the world seems to work – electricity, radio frequencies, water. He wanders the streets aimlessly looking for someone, but to no avail.

As the days and weeks go by Zac accepts the world he lives in. In a series of fun sequences we see Zac pass the time by changing cars everyday, driving a train, drinking champagne for breakfast, moving into a mansion as his home and declaring himself emperor of the world. But the materialism of our society is no substitute for the need for community and social interaction. He’s on the brink of total madness when he meets another survivor, a young red-haired ‘beauty’ (hey, it’s the 80’s), Joanne (Alison Routledge).



Their companionship develops, though they never consummate – come on, they’re the last couple on earth, that’s the easiest pick up line. Anyways, I digress, Zac (a scientist in his former life) conducts scientific tests on the sun and discovers an anomaly in the universe, which could cause the earth's total destruction in a matter of days. The science of it all makes as much sense as launching Bruce Willis into space to stop of a hurdling meteor from crashing into earth, but for some reason you just play along.

Soon a third man, Api, shows up, which completes the love triangle. Joanne and Api fall in love thereby alienating Zac. They discover their common thread. They all died, of one way or another, at the moment of the disaster and were miraculously reborn in the solitude of the earth. It’s not Kierkegaard, but the explanation gives the characters context and meaning for their existence. It’s a second chance to rediscover life and love.

The film’s strength is when it stays away from the dramatic presumption of the post-apocalyptic world, that all our social morals would disappear and we, as Darwinist beings, would devolve into a carnal animalistic world of kill-or-be-killed. The opposite happens as the effect of their solitude enforces the characters’ need for companionship and love.

The three of them eventually settle their conflict and develop a plan to stop the further destruction of the world by blowing up the scientific testing facility from where the anomaly originated. It’s interesting that the film doesn’t answer the questions it poses, it’s told from the survivor’s point of view and instead asks the audience to interpret meaning religiously or philosophically or whatever term you wish to describe events outside the realm of physical explanation.

In the end Zac makes a selfless sacrifice in order to save Api and Allison. The final moments are particularly enigmatic, which may leave some feeling shortchanged, but we are left with an awesome image – perhaps an homage to “2001: A Space Odyssey,” of man entering a new world and a new life with so much more to discover. Enjoy.

Buy it here: The Quiet Earth

NOTE, this is the awesome ending shot (contains spoilers):


Sunday, 25 February 2007

BAD BOY BUBBY


Bad Boy Bubby (1993) Dir. Rolf de Heer
Starring Nicholas Hope

Guest review by Blair Stewart

"F-- You, God!" - -The Scientist to Bubby

This is a film that has a quality among cinema-lovers who have witnessed and discussed it similar to that of a shared devotion to a notorious underground comedian or a small pocket of the earth that few have knowledge of and less have trod upon. "Yes, yes, you watched 'Oldboy', that's all well and good, but tell me, have you seen 'Bad Boy Bubby?'.

Our hero Bubby is a 38 year old man-child who has never left his deathly grey apartment. He has no concept of the outside world except for his crazy Mother and a stray cat he befriends and inadvertently murders with Clingwrap. By the time you pick your jaw up from the floor after the opening scene Bubby's Pop will have arrived and the machinations of fate and nature will have thrust our bad Boy out into the big wide world.

A hardcore thrash-punk discussion of man's nature with a long streak of lewd Aussie humour, director Rolf de Heer has created a near indefinable work that is at times laugh-out loud funny, appallingly tasteless, disquieting, and in one glorious monologue/long-take, as challenging as anything the likes of Angelopoulos or Haneke have ever produced. Nicholas Hope in the lead role, (last seen in Scooby Doo and now living in exile in Norway, appropriately enough) is as brave and unique an actor in the world as one could wish while reacting off his environment with a demented cherubic intensity. Using such experimental techniques as binaural microphones sown into the actors’ hairpieces to immerse the audience inside the character's reality and employing over 32 cinematographers to form a unique perspective on individual scenes “Bad Boy Bubby” pushes the boundaries of how to approach the craft of filmmaking.

So, can you stomach full-frontal sexuality? Can you handle chalk-black gallows comedy that you'll be shamed if you giggle with? Can you accept the subversive thrill that runs underneath this film as civility and humanity and religion are tossed out the window? Can you brave a film that you will never, ever, ever, ever forget? Then let me whisper it to you quietly: “Bad Boy Bubby”. PS-Not a date movie.