DAILY FILM DOSE: A Daily Film Appreciation and Review Blog: Canadian
[go: up one dir, main page]

Showing posts with label Canadian. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Canadian. Show all posts

Tuesday, 6 November 2012

Terror Train

At a glance this rarely discussed slasher film from the 1980s featuring libidinous teenagers getting hacked up by a masked villain, revenge for a fraternity prank gone wrong years ago, in the context of the sociopolitical significance of horror cinema, which is now a fully analyzable genre, is fascinating and admirable for reasons beyond pure entertainment.


Terror Train (1980) dir. Roger Spottiswoode
Starring: Jamie Lee Curtis, Ben Johnson, Hart Bochner, David Copperfield

By Alan Bacchus

This film has the distinction of being the first horror film I ever saw. And as a 6- year-old, the experience of watching a sadistic murderer kill innocent teenagers dressed up as Groucho Marx had a palpable imprinting effect on my life. I’ve never forgotten the fear and sheer terror this film caused me. Years later I was distraught to find out that most of the critical world didn’t feel the same way.

But the idea of a pristine Blu-ray version (via Shout Factory) of this highly personal film was akin to unearthing a time capsule from one's youth. I certainly wasn’t expecting a diamond in the rough. In fact, I had the opposite expectations, which had me even question whether re-watching this movie would tarnish my selective and biased childhood memories. Alas, no, I had to watch it.

Indeed, the film is not great. But it is fascinating.

The story can be summed up in a sentence or two. In the preamble we see Jamie Lee Curtis roped into participating in a cruel joke from her fraternity friend/jerk extraordinaire Doc Manley (Die Hard's Hart Bochner). Of course the prank goes wrong, the poor naïve kid is humiliated and for years he's treated for mental trauma. Cut to three years later, Curtis and the same group of pre-med students are partying it up on a New Year's Eve train ride full of booze, pot and heated sexual libidos. When one of the students is killed before boarding the train, and whose costumed identity is assumed by the killer, we assume it’s the same poor kid and that there’s going to be a bloodbath.

Curiously, the film is spare with its blood. Most of the kills are hidden from us, like a consciously PG version of the traditional slasher film. This point specifically is interesting to examine from the point of view of horror film history. Terror Train was made in 1980, thus it was one of the first of the modern teen slasher films. And if you look at Halloween (1978) and Friday the 13th (1980) explicit gore had yet to become a prerequisite for the genre.

As forgettable as the plotting and characterizations of the story may be, for genre enthusiasts the narrative deconstructs perfectly into the genre formula - the Inciting Incident: a community of people responsible for an immoral act against the villain in the past; Location: An isolated environment disconnected from the outside world; Villain: a masked avenger burdened by the trauma of the past; and a Twist: a whodunit mystery with misdirected cues and red herrings about the killer’s identity.

From a political point of view, this film was made in the heyday of the Canadian tax shelter, produced entirely in Canada with American money but independent of the studio system - though 20th Century Fox would later acquire the film for US distribution. Production values are surprisingly strong, especially the cinematography lensed by the great John Alcott (famous for shooting Kubrick films such as Barry Lyndon and The Shining). It also happens to be Roger Spottiswoode’s first feature, and his ability to choreograph suspenseful action within the tight space of a real train shows remarkable talent. And even the performances manage to surmount the rickety material. John Ford and Sam Peckinpah stalwart Ben Johnson as the heroic conductor is the heart of the film and lends immeasurable credibility to the action. And Jamie Lee Curtis, as usual, oozes screen charisma from her pores. David Copperfield also does a surprisingly good turn as a magician aboard the train who becomes the audience’s main suspect for the murders.

The Shout Factory Blu-ray/DVD disc holds deep reverence for the picture, as evidenced by the four well produced and informative featurettes centring on the production reminiscences of the then-young production executive Don Carmody, US producer Daniel Grodnik and the fine work of production designer Glenn Bydwell and composer John Mills-Cockell. Each of these men, while not claiming to have made fine art, take their work seriously. Their candid enthusiasm is refreshing and infectious, aiding in the appreciation of this picture in the context of the genre.

***

Monday, 21 November 2011

Father's Day - Toronto After Dark Film Festival 2011


Father's Day (2011) dir. Astron-6
(Adam Brooks, Jeremy Gillespie, Matthew Kennedy, Conor Sweeney)
Starring: Conor Sweeney, Adam Brooks, Matt Kennedy, Brent Neale, Amy Groening, Meredith Sweeney, Kevin Anderson, Garret Hnatiuk, Mackenzie Murdoch, Lloyd Kaufman

****

By Greg Klymkiw
"Death ends a life. But it does not end a relationship, which struggles on in the survivor's mind. toward some resolution which it may never find." - Robert Anderson from his play, I Never Sang For My Father

A father's love for his son is a special kind of love. As such, Dads the world over face that singular inevitability - that peculiar epoch in their collective lives, when they must chauffeur the apple of their eye from a police station, for the third time in a month, after said progeny has undergone questioning upon being found in a motel room with a dead man covered in blood, après le bonheur de la sodomie, only to return home after dropping said twink son on a street corner, so the aforementioned offspring of the light-in-the-loafer persuasion, can perform fellatio on old men for cash, whilst Dad sits forlornly in the domicile that once represented decent family values and stare at a framed photo of better times, until he succumbs to unexpected anal rape and as he weeps, face down and buttocks up, he is doused with gasoline and set on fire, then frenziedly tears into the street screaming, until collapsing in a charred heap in front of his returning son, who reacts with open-mouthed horror as the scent of old penis, wafts, ever so gently, from his delicate twink tonsils.

For most fathers, all of the above is, no doubt, a case of been-there-done-that - not unlike that inevitable fatherly attempt at understanding when Dad gently seeks some common ground with the fruits of his husbandly labours and offers: "Look son, I experimented when I was young, too."

So begins Father's Day - with the aforementioned, AND some delectable pre-credit butchery, an eye-popping opening credit sequence with images worthy of Jim Steranko and a series of flashbacks during an interrogation with a hard-boiled cop. This is the astounding feature film (the second completed feature this year) from the brilliant Winnipeg filmmaking collective Astron-6 (Adam Brooks, Jeremy Gillespie, Matthew Kennedy, Conor Sweeney) who have joined forces with the legendary Lloyd Kaufman and Michael Herz of Troma Entertainment to generate a film that is the ultimate evil bastard child sprung from the loins of a daisy chain twixt Guy Maddin, John Paizs, early David Cronenberg, Herschel Gordon Lewis and Abel Ferrara's The Driller Killer.

Father's Day is a triumph! It happily combines the effects of asbestos-tinged drinking water in Winnipeg with the Bukkake splatter of the coolest artistic influences imaginable and yields one of the Ten Best Films of 2011.

It is the seed of depraved genius that's spawned Astron-6 and, of course, with the best work in Canadian film, it has been embraced by an entity outside of Canada - the glorious aforementioned sleaze-bucket uber-mensch nutters who gave the world The Toxic Avenger. This collective of five (not six) brilliant filmmakers (including the above named quartet and Steven Kosanski, the F/X wizard, writer and director of Astron-6's MANBORG) are part of a new breed of young Canadian filmmakers who have snubbed their noses at the government-funded bureaucracies that oft-eschew the sort of transgression that normally puts smaller indigenous cultural industries on the worldwide map (including its own - Canada only truly supports such work grudgingly once it's found acceptance elsewhere). In this sense, Astron-6 has been making films under the usual radar of mediocrity and steadfastly adhering to the fine Groucho Marx adage: "I refuse to join any club that would have someone like me for a member."

Imagine, if you will, any government-funded agency (especially a Canadian one), doling out taxpayer dollars to the following plot: Chris Fuchman (Mackenzie Murdoch), is a serial killer that specializes in targeting fathers for anal rape followed by further degradations, including torture, butchery and/or murder. Our madman, Fuchman (substitute :k" for "h" to pronounce name properly), turns out to be a demon from the deepest pits of hell and a ragtag team is recruited by a blind infirm Archbishop of the Catholic Church (Kevin Anderson) to fight this disgusting agent of Satan. An eyepatch-wearing tough guy (Adam Brooks), a young priest (Matthew Kennedy), the aforementioned twink male prostitute (Conor Sweeney) and hard-boiled dick (Brent Neale) and a jaw-droppingly gorgeous stripper (Amy Groening) follow the trail of this formidable foe whilst confronting all their own personal demons.

This frothy brew of vile delights includes some of the most graphic blood splattering, vicious ass-slamming violence, gratuitous nudity, skimpy attire for the ladies, 'natch (and our delectable twink), morality, evisceration, hunky lads, delicious babes, compassion, rape, fellatio, chainsaw action, wholesome content, cannibalism, hand-to-hand combat, gunplay, family values, sodomy, immolation and monsters. It's all delivered up with a cutting edge mise-en-scène that out-grindhouses Tarantino's Grindhouse and delivers thrills, scares and laughs all in equal measure.

The film's sense of humour, in spite, or perhaps because of the proper doses of scatology and juvenilia is not the typical low-brow gross-out humour one finds in so many contemporary comedies, but frankly, works on the level of satire, and as such, is of the highest order. It stylistically straddles the delicate borders great satire demands. Too many people who should know better, confuse spoof or parody with satire and certainly anyone going to see Father's Day expecting SCTV, Airplane or Blazing Saddles might be in for a rude awakening. Yes, it's just as funny as any of those classic mirth-makers, but the laughs cut deep and they're wrought, not from the typical shtick attached to spoofs, but like all great satire, derive from the entire creative team playing EVERYTHING straight. No matter how funny, absurd or outlandish the situations and dialogue are, one never senses that an annoying tongue is being drilled firmly in cheek. Astron-6 loves their material and, importantly loves their creative influences. Their target is not necessarily the STYLE of film they're rendering homage to, but rather, the hypocrisies and horrors that face humanity everyday - religion, repression, dysfunction - all wedged cleverly into the proceedings.

Clearly a great deal of the movie's power in terms of its straight-laced approach to outlandish goings-on is found in the performances - all of them are spot-on. Adam Brooks IS a stalwart hero and never does he veer from infusing his role from the virtues inherent in such roles. Hell, he could frankly be Canada's Jason Statham in conventional action movies if anyone bothered to make such movies in Canada on any regular basis. Conor Sweeney as Twink is a marvel. Not only does he play the conflicted gay street hustler "straight", he straddles that terrific balance between genuinely rendering a layered character, but also infusing his performance with melodramatic aplomb. Not only is this ideal for the character itself, but it's perfectly in keeping with the style of movie that is being lovingly celebrated. Anyone who reads my stuff regularly will know my mantra: Melodrama is not a dirty word - as an approach to drama, it's a legitimate genre. There is good melodrama and bad melodrama, like any other genre. End of story. No arguments. Luckily, the Astron-6 team has the joy of glorious melodrama hard-wired into their collective DNA and Sweeney's performance is especially indelible in this respect. Brent Neale as the hard-boiled cop is, quite simply, phenomenal. Will someone out there give this actor job after job after job? The camera loves him and he knows how to play to the camera. He is clearly at home with the straight-up and melodramatic aspects of his role and most importantly, he is imbued with the sort of smoulder that makes stars - he's handsome and intense.

Astoundingly, not a single actor in this film feels out of place. Whether they're emoting straight, slightly stilted, wildly melodramatic or, on occasion (given the genre), magnificently reeking of ham, this is ensemble acting at its absolute best.

The entire movie was made on a budget of $10,000 and once again, for all the initiatives out there to generate low-budget feature films, Father's Day did it cheaper (WAY CHEAPER) and better. The movie uses its budgetary constraints not as limitations, but as a method to exploit what can be so special about movies. The visual and makeup effects as well as the art direction ooze imagination and aesthetic brilliance and it's all captured through a lens that puts its peer level and even some big budget extravaganzas to shame. Imagination is truly the key to success with no-budget movies. The Father's Day cinematography is often garish and lurid, but delightfully and deliciously so - with first-rate lighting and excellent composition. The filmmakers and their entire team successfully render pure gold out of elements that in most low-budget films just looks cheap - or worse, blandly competent (like most low budget Canadian movies). It's total trash chic - trash art, if you must.

I attended this spectacular event in France many years ago called the FreakZone International Festival of Trash Cinema which celebrated some of the most amazing transgressive works I'd ever seen. When I expressed to the festival director that I was surprised at the level of cinematic artistry, he just smiled and said, "You North Americans have such a limited view of trash culture - for us, trash is not garbage, we use the word to describe work that is subversive." This was so refreshing. It felt like a veil had been lifted from over me and I realized what EXACTLY it was that I loved about no-budget cinema - as a filmmaker, a teacher, a critic and fan.

Making a movie for no money that is NOT subversive on every level is, frankly, just plain stupid. What's the point? And Father's Day is nothing if it's not subversive. Besides, I've seen too many young filmmakers with talent galore ruined by initiatives that purported to celebrate the virtues of no-or-low-budget filmmaking but then forced the artists to apply the idiotic expectations of "industry standards" - whatever that means, anyway. This has been especially acute in Canada, but to be fair, in other non-North American countries also, where bureaucrats make decisions and/or define the rules/parameters of filmmaking.

Father's Day and the entire canon of the Astron-6 team should be the ultimate template for filmmakers with no money to seize the day and make cool shit. That's what it should always be about. And in this case, it took the fortitude of the filmmakers, their genuinely transgressive gifts as artists AND an independent AMERICAN producer to ensure that they made the coolest shit of all.

What finally renders Father's Day special is just how transgressively intelligent it all is and yet, never turns its proverbial nose up at the straight-to-video-nasties of the 80s, the grindhouse cinema of the 60s and 70s and the weird, late night cable offerings of the early 90s. It works very much on the level of the things it loves best. This is real filmmaking - it entertains, it dazzles, it makes use of every cheap trick in the book to create MOVIE magic and finally, it's made by people who clearly care about film. They get to have their cake and eat it too by having as much fun making the movies as we have watching them.

Father's Day was unveiled at Toronto's premiere genre film event, the Toronto After Dark Film Festival 2011 where it won several awards: the grand prize of Best Film, Most Original Film, Best Hero, Best Kills, Best Trailer and Best Poster - all voted on by the thousands of attendees of the festival. It will be released theatrically in early 2012 by Troma Entertainment and will be followed with the usual forays into home entertainment formats.

Wednesday, 26 October 2011

The Divide - Toronto After Dark Film Festival 2011


The Divide (2011) dir. Xavier Gens
Starring: Michael Biehn, Laura German, Milo Ventimiglia, Michael Eklund, Rosanna Arquette

***1/2

By Greg Klymkiw

We've seen it before, but we all know it's the ride that counts, and if nasty, darkly humorous, character-driven dystopian science fiction is what you're into, The Divide is one chilling, hair-raising, white-knuckle roller coaster charging into the horrors of a crazed post-apocalyptic Hell. In fact, the primary setting for the film is beneath ground in the laundry and storage rooms of an apartment building that's been otherwise levelled in a full-scale nuclear attack upon the city of New York.

It's Hell, alright. Though we're without the traditional trappings of Hades hellfire and bubbling lava, there's certainly plenty of roiling emotion within the ravaged, terrified, paranoid and even sociopathic minds of those who find themselves trapped in this coffin below the inferno of radiation and mass destruction.

Mickey (Michael Biehn) is the wired and wiry cigar puffing ruler of the roost - the building's super who lives in the basement and has equipped it with all the elements necessary to survive in the event of a Post-9/11 attack that makes the destruction of the Twin Towers seem like a zit-burst. He agrees to take in a few survivors, but as the story progresses, he clearly seems sorry he bothered. After all, this is his home, his own personal safe harbour and he expects compliance and downright subservience in accordance with his rules and manner of living. Alas, some of his charges are live wires - questioning his moves and motives every step of the way.

In this role, Biehn is nothing short of brilliant. In the late 80s and early 90s, he was one of the most exciting young actors in American cinema and poised to be a star with considerable leverage and longevity. As the stalwart hero in several James Cameron classics; The Terminator, Aliens and The Abyss, as well as his complex and electrifying performance in William Friedkin's criminally neglected courtroom thriller Rampage, Biehn eventually became a solid working actor - appearing in a lot of crap - always doing fine work, but ultimately rising as far as anyone could above substandard material. Exceptions to this were his appearances in Bereavement and Planet Terror, but his performance in The Divide is not only dazzling, but rendered in a movie worthy of his considerable talents. It's not quite what you'd call a comeback role, since he's never really been gone, but I'd still say it's a breakthrough performance and one that makes me hope he'll be on the receiving end of increasingly better roles. (I'd happily, for example, donate my right testicle to science to see him opposite Michael Shannon in a new William Friedkin picture. Hey, a boy can dream, can't he?)

Happily, Biehn is surrounded by a terrific cast in a movie that's directed with all the pizzaz and unyielding aplomb of the talented Xavier Gens (I loved Hitman). With Gens at the helm, The Divide is one splendidly horrific tale that features a microcosmic look at humanity under duress. We have a young, married couple on the brink of divorce, a tough-minded African American who senses their protector is hiding something, a middle aged Mom (the welcome presence of Rosanna Arquette) with a terrified young daughter and two foul bad boys who get a whole lot badder than we're prepared to imagine.

And then there are the armed, weird-ass scientists in protective garb - kidnapping surviving children and performing the most horrendous experiments upon them.

And, lest we forget, there's the septic system. Once the ragtag band of survivors are literally welded into the underground coffin with no means of escape, we discover that a swim through a tunnel of fecal matter is the only way out. Any guesses whether someone eventually wades through the gloppy, glistening, stench-ridden tunnels?

As tensions rise, so do the acts of inhumanity - bullying, beatings, murder, torture, and even forced sexual slavery. If you're looking for a shred of hope, you might not find it in The Divide, but like all well constructed drama of this kind, the thing you look for in earnest amidst the depravity, comes from the unlikeliest places at the least expected moments. Yes, humanity is buried deep within this pit of horror.

Without question, the tense human conflict and emotion of this film is charged to the max. Gens seldom lets us rest easy as an audience. We always have to be on our toes - evil lurks around every corner and the movie jolts us time and time again. This is not to say the exploitative elements are paint-by-numbers. They're earned. They're rooted in character and story. The movie terrifies, dazzles AND moves us tremendously. Most amazingly, we almost NEVER leave the confines of the basement. Lesser films blatantly use this as a cost-cutting measure, but in The Divide, it never seems like a story rooted in a machine-tooled setting to yield maximum production value for minimum dollars. So many lower-budgeted genre films are too self-aware of these limitations and we're taken out of the drama because of it.

Not so, here.

To coin a phrase from George Romero's Dawn of the Dead: "When there's no more room in Hell, the Dead will walk the Earth." In The Divide, it's the other way around. Hell is above ground and the living dead walk BELOW the Earth.

And in this Hell, there's plenty of room for the living dead.

The Divide will hopefully receive a proper theatrical release soon. In the meantime, it screened as part of the first-rate Toronto After Dark Film Festival 2011, delivering yet another triumph for the premiere genre event in Canada.

Thursday, 16 June 2011

The Decline of the American Empire

The Decline of the American Empire (1986) dir. Denys Arcand
Starring: Rémy Girard, Dominique Michel, Pierre Curzi, Yves Jacques, Dorothée Berryman, Louise Portal

***1/2

By Alan Bacchus

Denys Arcand’s controversial conversation piece from the ‘80s has a unique claim to fame for being the only film to have been nominated for Best Foreign Language Film in addition to its sequel. The sequel was The Barbarian Invasions (2003) and actually won the award. The Decline of the American Empire features a group of men and a group of women talking candidly about sex, love, marriage and infidelity, like a raunchier My Dinner With Andre or Neil Labute at his most bold.

Remy, Pierre, Claude and Alain are a group of middle-aged history professors holed up in a lakeside cottage up north preparing a sumptuous meal. Dominique, Louise, Diane and Danielle are their female counterparts working out at the university gymnasium. For the boys, the conversation consists of either intellectual pontificating about sociology, history and politics or dirty and frank sex talk. Remy and Pierre are the alphas, both of whom are fully proud of their careers of cheating on their wives, despite the fact that neither of them is particular good-looking. Claude is gay and offers his opinion about the thrill of cruising for guys even with the danger of AIDS on the horizon. Yves is young and wet behind the ears, but he admires these guys for their accomplishments.

The gals mostly talk about their current and past relationships, acknowledging and expressing superiority to the likelihood of their husband’s infidelities. After intercutting these two sets of conversations, Arcand joins both groups when the gals converge on the cottage for the feast where much drama ensues.

Looking back, The Decline of the American Empire fits in well with the prevailing attitudes and politics of the ‘80s. It was a decade of capitalist wealth and power in extremes, which begat a hubris of invisibility. For the Western nations it was economic invincibility, and for Arcand’s characters it was emotional invincibility.

Arcand is devious and clever, forcing us to formulate an opinion of this group as detached erudites intellectually superior to their own relationships and thus immune to the ravages of love and human emotion. But Arcand pulls the rug from under us in the third act by exposing their false bravado in dramatic fashion. When one of the gals admits to sleeping with two of the men at the table, despite the intellectual posturing, Diane breaks down like any human being would, devastated and humiliated, stripped of all the emotional barriers that were falsely constructed.

At times the conversations are forced, aggressively pushing the agenda in an essayist form rather than naturalism. And that ‘80s fashion is quite awful, but there's no one to blame for that. There's also some politically incorrect racial references that leave a bitter taste, but the exposure of these intellectual boobs as inexcusable predators of a shameful era resonates soundly. Arcand has his finger squarely on this pulse and puts the sad irony of this most superficial era into the conversations and ulterior motives of his characters.

The Decline of the American Empire is available on Blu-ray from EOne Home Entertainment.

Sunday, 1 May 2011

HOT DOCS 2011: The Chocolate Farmer

The Chocolate Farmer (2011) dir. Rohan Fernando
Documentary

***

By Alan Bacchus

Raising a half-dozen kids and making a living off the land in the ways of one's Mayan ancestors while trying to stay afloat in a modern, globalized world is difficult for a humble cacao bean farmer. Eladio Pop is one such man, a Belizean cacao farmer who farms those little beans and trades them on the market for a pittance compared to his industrial competitors. But making money is secondary to Eladio. As an aboriginal Mayan, he takes pride in doing it in the ways of his parents, his grandparents and the generations before them. Rohan Fernando's NFB doc shows a year in the life of this man, his farm, his family and their nearly outmoded way of life.

Rohan's camera captures the lush, unspoiled beauty of the Central American rainforest with the natural ease of Werner Herzog or even Terrence Malick. The pace is slow but elegant, contributing to a transcendental appreciation of the "New World," as Columbus would have seen it. (Well, actually, Belize was colonized by the British, so everyone mostly speaks Caribbean-accented English.)

The details of Eladio's daily activities are fascinating. With only a machete, he's able to cultivate his land, create pathways through the dense rainforest, cut down his cacao fruits and extract the mouth-watering goodness inside. Life is bliss when we see him sip sugar cane from vines and swim freely in the warm freshwater rivers. But life is also very hard for Eladio.

He's full of contradictions and for good and bad, director Rohan is clear not to pass judgment on his main character; we're never quite sure what to think of him. On the one hand, we admire the indigenous pride in his independence and his resolute determination not to lose his heritage. On the other, his stubbornness to accept the changing world order, specifically shutting down the dreams of his children to go to school, educate themselves and self-determine their fates in the world, feels irresponsible and short-sighted.

Fernando's unobtrusive, observational, even "polite" style makes this contradiction a little murky. These internal and external conflicts are never fully capitalized upon for cinematic effect. Fernando is too enamoured with Eladio to take him to task on the affect of his stubbornness on his family. Perhaps the Pops are content with their lives and everything's hunky-dory, but by the reactions of his children, there's a deep sense of discomfort, which Fernando never quite pulls out of them.

As a visual essay, or omniscient slice of life, which the old NFB used to do very well, The Chocolate Farmer succeeds, but as a dramatic, moving, emotionally insightful feature film competitive with the more successful theatrical documentaries of today, it unfortunately never reaches that level.

This review was previously published on Exclaim.ca

Wednesday, 16 March 2011

Gerald Pratley (1923-2011)


An appreciation and memoir

by Greg Klymkiw

"It's strange, isn't it? Each man's life touches so many other lives. When he isn't around he leaves an awful hole, doesn't he?"

-Henry Travers as Clarence Oddbody - A.S.#2 (Angel - Second Class), dialogue from Capra's It's a Wonderful Life

A giant died on Monday.

His name was Gerald Pratley.

Gerald was 87 years old.

Though he wasn't a household name, it's no exaggeration that anyone in Canada who TRULY cared about cinema, knew or knew of this titan who devoted every fibre of his being to the study and appreciation of that great gift to mankind - the movies.

Gerald Pratley was a critic, author, teacher, historian, programmer and founder of the Ontario Film Institute - twenty years of curating, screening and archiving film history that was extended and preserved as the Ontario Cinematheque, a year-long stomping grounds for movie nuts in Toronto and most importantly, with the support of the Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF), Pratley's vision morphed into the TIFF Lightbox.

As Clarence Oddbody pointed out to George Bailey in It's a Wonderful Life, "Each man's life touches so many other lives. When he isn't around he leaves an awful hole..."

Without Gerald Pratley there would have been no Cinematheque and no Lightbox. It's especially shameful and ultimately to the loss of both the Toronto International Film Festival and its followers that Gerald's important place in cinema (and that organization) was relegated to a buried acknowledgment in their staff/contributor listings and that he was never given a proper venue within the organization to share his wealth of knowledge with movie lovers.

Gerald Pratley was to cinema in this country what George Bailey came to represent to the millions upon millions of people who saw Frank Capra's masterpiece. His incalculable list of achievements as a promoter of great cinema are a matter of public record. Named as a member of the Order of Canada, Gerald was subsequently brought into the fold as an officer of that order and he was honoured with a special prize for his devotion to cinema at the 2002 edition of the Academy of Canadian Cinema and Television's Genie Awards. (I do remember, however, that our publicly-funded network, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, CBC, in collusion with the Academy decided to relegate the full extent of Gerald's honour in the non-broadcast portion of the program and during the live broadcast threw up a clip of Gerald accepting the award with some innocuous voice-over. This, of course, was a notable precursor to the Oscars' idiotic recent habit of relegating such important awards - the most egregious being Roger Corman's lifetime achievement award - to a similar corner of the show. Certainly not a trend worth setting, but significant that with Gerald at the Genies it was the first time I noticed the film industry making the boneheaded omission of its pioneers in awards ceremonies.)

Gerald's myriad of accomplishments in the world of cinema rival in number and importance the number of "begats" in the Book of Genesis. Why shouldn't they? Cinema is a temple - all seeing, all showing, all holy - and Gerald Pratley was one of cinema's High Priests.

Though He is no longer with us in a physical form, Gerald continues to touch us all. He continues to touch those who had the honour of making his acquaintance and with equal force, he will touch so many others who never met him (as well as those who might not have even heard of him).

He most certainly touched my life and perhaps, through my personal experience and respect for him, he will touch others.

In fact, I hope all who knew him will spread his love.

And it was a special love.

Gerald loved movies and this love was infectious. His was the business of making the adoration of cinema spread like some pathogenic agent. While for some, the unconditional, obsessive love of cinema may seem like an "abnormal" condition, I think most of us who have been touched by the magic of movies will happily take aberrance over "normal" anytime.

And of course, Gerald loved the company of those who loved movies. His devotion to ensuring that movies in all their splendour could be seen and revered not just as mere baubles, distractions and ephemera was equalled by very few.

Movies - GREAT movies - were meant to last forever and Gerald used every means at his disposal to make this a reality.

I had known of Gerald and his work for many years (that part of life when movies mattered more than most anything) and while I admired him from afar, I never dared approach him for fear of imposing myself on someone I so revered. This was, of course, typically Canadian of me. When I was finally introduced to Gerald in 1994 at the Montreal World Film Festival, I realized I was clearly in the presence of a force exuding an unbridled level of love and appreciation of movies, but he did so with such humility and warmth, that I simply wanted to kick myself in the head for not making his acquaintance at an earlier juncture.

Over the years, I continued to see Gerald at film festivals and various industry functions. The level of discourse was always a treat and I fell in awe with his knowledge of cinema history and critical acumen.

I fondly recall an evening at the Berlin Film Festival in 1995 where we shared a ride to a party for Patricia Rozema's "When Night is Falling". I think everybody was in the mood to celebrate Rozema's magnificent achievement, but upon arriving in East Berlin, the thump-thump-thump of the house music inside the lesbian dance club was so shuddering, so deafening, so - dare I say it? - uninviting, that a whole group of us stood outside in the freezing cold for a long time.

Accompanying me in the frigid Berlin clime was Cynthia Roberts (the director of the film I had produced called "The Last Supper", also being honoured in Berlin that year), the late Jim Murphy (a veteran film distributor and, at the time, a promoter of Canadian cinema through an agency of the Ontario Ministry of Culture), Risa Shuman (the legendary producer of the long-running film appreciation series "Saturday Night at the Movies" on TV Ontario) and, of course, Gerald.

We all (like good Canadians who knew very well how to weather sub-zero temperatures) stamped our feet, blew into our freezing cupped hands and talked about movies - anything but enter that club of ear-splitting dance music.

Soon, however, it was Gerald who donned the bravest face I think I'd ever seen and it was he who led the way into that dark den of fierce party hounds. This was a Canadian celebration for a Canadian film from a Canadian director we all loved and admired. What else could one do, but follow the Leader?

Our Leader, once ensconced within the cove of celebratory depravity, made an immediate beeline for one of the many silver-painted waitresses to imbibe in a bit of cheer.

About ten days prior to Gerald's passing, I journeyed from Toronto to the Pickering Flea Market to visit Michel Harmouche's astounding DVD Wave stand and while perusing stacks upon stacks of movies, I caught myself having imaginary conversations in my head with the aforementioned late and great Jim Murphy. It was uncanny. I was genuinely having a conversation with my old pal who came with me every Saturday for years to buy movies here.

Very pleasantly, my thoughts that day in Pickering turned to Gerald and in almost photographic detail, I remembered a Saturday morning several years ago in which Jim convinced Mr. Pratley to join us on one of our pilgrimages to this temple of boundless, superbly priced home entertainment product. Gerald's eyes widened to saucer-like proportions upon his inaugural gander at the ocean of movies in Michel's stand and soon yielded the kind of magic I seem to only experience with friends and colleagues who share my pathological love of movies. Gerald dove into the infinitesimal chasm of DVDs and immediately fished out a title which, he promptly handed to me.

Eureka!

On the car ride to Pickering - Gerald in the front passenger side and Jim in the middle of the rear seat - one of the many movie-related subjects included the work of director Robert Aldrich. Of course we jawed enthusiastically about the crime and action pictures he made like "Kiss Me Deadly" and "The Dirty Dozen", but when the topic turned to Aldrich's penchant for overripe melodrama, I lit-up like a bank of footlights and Gerald proceeded to wax ever-so eloquently on Aldrich's harridan hag oeuvre which, of course, included such taste treats as Whatever Happened to Baby Jane and Hush, Hush Sweet Charlotte. This direction in the conversation pleased me to no end - I was (and still am) a sucker for hags (and babes) slugging it out in psychological and/or literal movie cat fights.

When Gerald asked my opinion of a certain Aldrich fraulein-freak-show and I ashamedly had to admit I'd never seen it, the resulting magic at DVD Wave was indeed Gerald plucking right out of that bin none other than Aldrich's The Killing of Sister George. How I'd managed not to even see the movie is one thing, but to have not found a DVD copy of it after a few years of diving into Michel's stock is (and indeed was) beyond me.

When I heard about Gerald's death, I couldn't stop thinking about my imaginary conversation with Jim Murphy in Pickering ten days earlier and how THAT inspired me to think about the long-ago halcyon journey to the same hamlet of all-bargains-cinematical. Damn! I even remember thinking - whilst I was there ten days ago: "Hey, Gerald lives in Belleville. That's not too far from here. It's been too long. Maybe I should just hop in the car and make the trek."

I didn't, though.

And now I wonder if I'll be constructing similar imaginary conversations in my head with Gerald. The ones I had with Jim certainly seemed very real, so maybe, at some point something will tweak me and I'll be sitting in Belleville with Gerald Pratley talking about movies.

One can, I suppose, chalk up the idea of such imaginary conversations enveloped in a tangible clarity as being the direct result of mental illness and/or an overactive imagination.

But you know, dismissing the reality of imagination takes NO imagination - none at all!

Movies are dreams and dreams fuel us.

It's dreams and imagination that fuel filmmakers to deliver all those endless pieces of time.

It's dreams and imagination that keep the spirits of those we hold dear alive forever.

And they are alive, but to keep them living, we must always keep their spirits within us.

Their spirits must course through our dreams and imagination.

They have, after all, touched so many other lives and can continue to do so through US.

That day with Gerald and Jim in Pickering will always stay with me. The excitement of unwrapping The Killing of Sister George and feeling that delectable gooseflesh of joy as I watched it courses through me even now.

I want to relive that Saturday sojourn again and again.

That day and everyday that followed was touched by Gerald's presence.

It was magic.

Just like the movies.

Just like the inimitable Gerald Pratley.

Thursday, 6 January 2011

Mon Oncle Antoine

Mon Oncle Antoine (1971) dir. Claude Jutra
Starring: Jacques Gagnon, Lyne Champagne, Jean Duceppe, Claude Jutra

****

By Alan Bacchus

Mon Oncle Antoine is like Citizen Kane of Canada. In numerous polls conducted over the years in this country, this film each and every time ranks as the greatest Canadian film ever made. The story of a rural and wintery Quebec mining town as seen through eyes of a young teenage boy, Antoine is deservedly revered internationally for it's poetic depiction of an aging and soon to be outmoded way of life, a timeless classic, John Ford-worthy elegance transplanted to a French-Canadian winter.

We’re told it’s a long time ago but never exactly how long ago (it's actually the 1940's). Jutra dramatizes Benoit's journey like a grandfather telling a bed time story, recounting his youth through the filtered lens of nostalgia. Young Benoit (Jacques Gagnon), 15, lives with his drunk and surly Uncle Antoine and his Aunt. He works at the general store owned by Aunt and Uncle helping to serve the miners who work extracting asbestos from the nearby quarry. Antoine also is the town undertaker, a job which has him moving bodies around by horse-powered sled. For most of the film we're observing the relationships of the townsfolk through the eyes of Benoit. The romance of these working class folks is surpringly sweet and tender and humour, their  healthy libidos often cause them to find trysts in barns and attics on a whim.

Benoit is thoroughly fascinating offering us the point of view of this bygone era. The young actor Jacques Gagnon has a remarkable face like Jean-Pierre Leaud in 400 Blows. He barely speaks instead we find emotion through his silent and stoic reactions to the events around him. The moment Benoit sees the corpse of the young Poulin child who has died is heartbreaking, and even more so as seen through the innocent eyes of Benoit.

This terrific scene leads to the stunning and poignant third act journey home where we see the dramatic confession of Antoine and the completion of Benoit's rite of passage and ascendancy into adulthood. The final supremely emotional image of the boy watching the grieving family is as powerful as it gets in cinema.

The asbestos mine looms over the town and thus the historical context of the movie. Health concerns are not mentioned, but knowing the dangers involved and likely the exploitation of the miners adds another level of sadness and melancholy. In fact, though it's not mentioned we can't help but wonder if the young boy's death was not influenced by the asbestos we see billowing into the sky from the quarry.

Those who know their Canadian history will find links to the landmark labour strikes which would occur shortly after this time and the beginning of the 'Quiet Revolution' which provided the seeds for French separatist movement in the 60's. These levels are never referenced overtly, yet so profoundly affect us subliminally.

The poetic and melancholy tone is remarkably affecting. The relationship of the characters to their environment, the omnipresent snow and wind which the characters seem to be guided by reminds us of Terrence Malick’s characters drifting through the wheat fields in Days of Heaven. Perhaps the best comparison would be another film from 1971, Peter Bogdanovich’s Last Picture Show, another Ford-influenced coming-of age-story from another era. Mon Oncle Antoine is as good as all of the above.

Mon Oncle Antoine is available as one of the recent titles from the Criterion Collection, the ideal showcase for one of the greatest films ever made.

Friday, 31 December 2010

Mesrine Part I: Killer Instinct

Mesrine (2010) dir. Jean-Francois Richet
Starring: Vincent Cassel, Roy Dupuis, Gerard Depardieu,

**1/2

By Alan Bacchus

French international criminal Jacques Mesrine gets his life story told on film in a rare two-part feature event. Perhaps he's famous in France or Quebec, but it's curious to see such a relatively obscure gangster receive such mainstream attention. But I'll give the filmmakers the benefit of the doubt that Jacques Mesrine is a big deal , one deserving of being glorified in dual-feature fashion, like Che or Carlos.

Director Richet starts off in 1955 during the French occupation of Algeria, where Mesrine served as a soldier in the French Army, proving his salt as a killer by callously murdering an Algerian prisoner. We then catch up with him in '59, leaving his humble middle-class parents to join the growing drug trade in France. A tempestuous marriage that produces a daughter who's quickly discarded in favour of his chosen lifestyle leads to a series of colourful bank robberies and other criminal acts in the '60s.

In the late '60s, Mesrine escapes French authorities to Quebec, where he links up with FLQ terrorist Jean-Paul Mercier (played by Roy Dupuis) for more rampages abroad. Mesrine: Part 1 Killer Instinct ends with a raucous sequence where we see Mesrine escape a Quebec prison, arm himself to the teeth then go back to free his fellow prisoners. If this actually transpired, what balls!

Where a Canadian director might have slowed the pacing, French director Richet's experience with action (helming the Assault on Precinct 13 remake) helps keep a quick tempo. Vincent Cassel is typically engaging, the perfect type of iconoclast to play this madman of a character. For us Canadians though, the real fun is the rare opportunity to see a French star share the screen with a bonafide French-Canadian star. Roy Dupuis doesn't have a great deal to work with, but he grits his teeth well, looks mean and wears a grizzled tough guy beard as best he can. Despite the limited role, he's the perfect match for Cassel.

By the end, we unfortunately don't receive a great deal of emotional payoff: Mesrine and Mercier kill a pair of innocent park rangers in particularly brutal fashion then the film fades to black. It's difficult to form a critical opinion of Mesrine Part 1 without knowing the rest of the tale; it doesn't stand alone, like Che Part 1, and lacks the wonderful teasing of Kill Bill Vol. 1, Back to the Future 2 or even The Matrix Reloaded, so I'm not sure I care about seeing Part 2: Public Enemy #1.

The final text tells us Mesrine's time in, and escape from, the Quebec prison helped a shine a light on the brutality of these establishments. But without seeing any of this on screen, this final adjunct comes across like a desperate attempt to allay the inevitable accusations of glorifying Mesrine's violent, heinous actions.

Wednesday, 22 September 2010

Dog Pound

Dog Pound (2010) dir. Kim Chapiron
Starring: Adam Butcher, Shane Kippel, Mateo Morales, Slim Twig, Dewshane Williams

***½

By Alan Bacchus

One of the most suprising international co-pro collaborations has to be French-Canadian film Dog Pound, originated by a group of edgy French filmmakers, but shot in New Brunswick with Canadian actors. It played earlier this year at the Tribeca Film Festival, but none of the other major festivals, including Toronto, and now sees a straight to DVD release. It’s a shame, at once it’s a familiar story, a prison film, juvenile prison that is, featuring teenagers locked up for various malfeasant beheaviour. But it's the combination of classic prison film tropes, that hip (Parisian)French toughness and one helluva breakout performance which makes this a fine under-the-radar winner.

Canadian viewers will recognize co-lead Shane Kippel as Spinner from Degrassi The Next Generation. He’s a different actor in a different role here though. He provides a solid co-anchor to this film as Davis a teenaged drug peddler set up for possession and intent to sell and who now finds himself in juvie. After arriving in prison, he seeks to keep to himself and not make waves. But when a particularly nasty bully with two thugs steal his boots he becomes bitch #1 for the local heavies.

Davis finds a protector in Butch (Adam Butcher), a rebellious youth locked up for beating up another guard in another prison. Though tall in stature, he's an unassuming kid, but suppressing a deep deep desire to bust the heads of the bullies who pick on his mates.

Eventually rage rears its head, and Butch the maniac is unleashed with uncompromising force. Same with the performance of Adam Butcher, which is so astounding, it's a star making performance which unfortunately just might get lost. At least to the public - the Hollywood system has a knack of finding and coddeling talent, and with the instantly iconoclastic performance on display in this film, Butcher should be a star very soon.

Other than the breakout of Butcher, the pedigree of this film is fascinating. The filmmaking team seems to comes from a new school of hip young French filmmakers. Chapiron (a male) turned heads with his audacious 2006 horror/thriller film Sheitan starring Vincent Cassel. Scrolling through the end credits and you just might miss Romain Gavras as the 2nd unit director. His first feature just premed at TIFF here, 'Our Day Will Come' also starring Cassel. That film wasn't all that great, but showed enough promise to take him (oh yeah, he's also the son of Costa-Gavras) very seriously.

And lastly, scroll down in the credits even further and you'll see this film is actually a remake of an Alan Clarke film, Scum. Clark of course provided the source material for Gus Van Sant's Elephant, and in general is one of the most highly influential British television directors of the 60's, 70's and 80's..

Dog Pound is not perfect. Chapiron's script isn't as tight as it could be. The plotting gets spotty as plot threads and character arcs jump around. He also relies on the some stock characters, specifically the unsentimental prison guards, and familiar prison situations (yes, people get anally raped). But it's Chapiron's blanket of tension and chaos and his awesome set pieces of violence and destruction which smooth over any bumps in the road. I've visited a prison and spoken to immates and it's fucking scary, really scary. This is not Shawshank Redemption, this is badass, emotionally draining, in-your-face reality-based cinema.

So what gives? Perhaps the timing wasn't good, in the past year we've seen other art house prison film such as Bronson, Hunger, A Prophet all make waves in festivals. Sadly Dog Pound, and one of the best performances of the year, Adam Butcher, seems to get lost in the shuffle. So please discover this one on DVD.

Dog Pound is available on DVD and Blu-Ray from Alliance Films in Canada

Thursday, 2 September 2010

The Wild Hunt

The Wild Hunt (2010) dir. Alexandre Franchi
Starring: Kyle Gatehouse, Mark Antony Krupa, Kaniehtiio Horn, Trevor Hayes, Claudia Jurt

****

By Alan Bacchus

It’s been said there are only so many stories to tell, and even less in genre cinema. Just when you think you’ve seen everything, along comes a film like The Wild Hunt, which is kind of amazing – a truly original and unpredictable genre film with equal parts comedy, horror, tragedy.

Canadian director Alexandre Franchi creates a Shakespearean worthy melodrama within the little known world of LARPers, that is Live Action Role Playing – people who have taken Dungeons and Dragons to the level beyond the 12 sided die into actual embodiment of its characters. All around the world LARPers convene at various events and conventions for celebratory games of role playing. And herein Franchi masterfully finds some monumental comedy and tragedy.

The Wild Hunt is clever to deceive us with a traditional and familiar setup. After our hero David (Kyle Gatehouse) breaks up with girlfriend Evelyn (Horn), he rushes after her with reckless abandon with full on romantic blinders on. Here’s where it gets a little tricky...Evelyn has taken the weekend off to participate in the annual Renaissance fair and the problem for David is he can’t gain access to the grounds unless he’s in costume and in character and part of the game. David thus reluctantly joins up with his older brother Bjorn (Mark Krupa), the most enthusiastic gamer of all them, someone who refuses to break character despite his brother’s pleas for help.

Once in the game Evelyn is captured by Bjorn’s rival group, led by the nasty shaman Murtagh (Trevor Hayes) who angles for the affection of Evelyn both in and out of character. We’re never quite sure if it’s part of the role playing, or whether David’s enemies truly want Evelyn to themselves. It’s all fun and games till someone gets hurt and gradually, like the kids of ‘Lord of the Flies’, what starts out fun, devolves into sinister and possibly deadly real world conflict.

It would have been easy for Franchi to lampoon the Larping milieu, after all the notion of grown men and women dressing up as medieval knights is particularly absurd, and god knows these types of people have been beaten down before in cinema (ie. The Cable Guy and Role Models). And so it’s refreshing to see Franchi approach the subject matter seriously, without ridicule, but with a dash of the absurd.

Only when we take this world seriously do we understand how the actions of the characters could progress to such obsessive delusions of grandeur. In the third act when things go awry we can understand the mindset of the players living in an insular world of their own, channelling some kind of Meisner technique, and unable to see the forest from the trees. The result is a biting social commentary reminiscent of the social malfeasance of Lars Von Trier’s The Idiots.

Franchi’s elevated operatic style of storytelling allows the action to push the boundaries of plausibility while staying in total reality. And with a miniscule $500,000 budget Franchi masterfully creates a visually vibrant world as big and bold as the emotions and actions of his characters. Interviews over the festival life of the film reveals that Franchi shot in a real Larping event and used the real people, props, costumes to amplify his production value.

The miracle of The Wild Hunt though is Franchi’s chutzpah and assured confidence to push the film in a direction few if any would predict. Without giving too much away, by the end you should be left breathless, shocked with mouth agape as I was. This is one of the best films of the year.

'The Wild Hunt' is available on DVD from TVA Films in Canada

Thursday, 1 July 2010

The Claim

The Claim (2000) dir. Michael Winterbottom
Starring: Peter Mullan, Sarah Polley, Mila Jovovich, Wes Bentley, Julian Richings, Natasha Kinski

****

By Alan Bacchus

Refashioning Thomas Hardy’s novel The Mayor of Casterbridge for the post gold rush Sierra Nevadas along with a not-so-disguised influence from Robert Altman’s snowy western classic McCabe and Mrs. Miller, Michael Winterbottom created an emotional powerhouse of a film, full of brooding drama about greed, gold and deep-rooted Catholic guilt.

It’s also Winterbottom’s most beautiful film he’s shot – a classical and elegant style much different than his street realism fly-on-the-wall films such as A Might Heart or 24 Hour Party People, and on second viewing on the big screen this week at my latest Canadian Cinema in Revue screening (plug plug), it resonates as one of beautiful films of the decade (hell, yeah I said it).

Sarah Polley plays a naive waif Hope Burn who comes to the town of Kingdom Come with her TB-inflicted mother Elena (Natasha Kinski) to meet a long lost ‘relative’ Daniel Dillon (Peter Mullan). But unbeknownst to her, he’s actually her real father. Dillon runs the town like a king and hordes a stash of gold in his bank. Flashbacks recounts and reveals how Dillon’s sold his wife and baby for the deed to the land and thus his ticket to wealth. So much wealth and nothing to spend it on, but when he meets Hope for the first time, instantly a wave of guilt fuels a new zest for life and need for redemption.

At the same time, an ambitious young railroad engineer Dalglish (Wes Bentley) comes into town to survey the surrounding lands, which will ultimate cause the town to move thus nullifying everything Dillon built up in his life.

Winterbottom doubles Alberta’s Rockies for California’s Sierra Nevadas to magnificent effect. In every exterior frame he maximizes the awesomeness of the engulfing mountains, sharp darting evergreen trees which dot the background and the omnipresent snow which gusts around constantly. Remember, it was the year 2000 and CGI was a rarity, so everything in the film is real. Though CGI is able to come very close to achieving the real thing, our minds can sense fakery. And so in The Claim, when we see a young Dillon and Elena climb a mountain in a blustery snow storm the realism on the screen allows the emotions of these scenes to hit us harder.

Winterbottom crafts a number of astounding set pieces which remind us of the grandiose aspirations of David Lean, Sergio Leone and Werner Herzog. The finale, which has Dillon setting all the buildings of his town on fire is a sight to behold, not because Winterbottom actually burned down his entire set, but because it compliments Dillon’s emotional state and completes the atonement for his egregious sins against his family. There’s also the house moving scene, wherein Dillon, at his most ambitious like Herzog’s Fitzcarraldo, wills the impossible into being, steering a team of men who literally pull his house to Elena as a gift of his rekindled love. It’s also an impossible romantic moment which seals Dillon’s last courtship of his ex-wife.

And the three of four surveying scenes taking us into the Albertan and Colorado valleys of where Dalglish charts the new path of the railroad, are no less spectacular. The last of which features a trip on a vintage 19th century railroad through a curving corridor of stunning beauty.

The Claim resonates beyond the mere beauty of what’s put on the screen. Michael Nyman’s masterpiece of a score send the film into the stratosphere, going way over the top in the tradition of the classic Morricone scores composed for Sergio Leone. The moral complexities of Dillon’s journey is the stuff of great storytelling – though credit is due here to Thomas Hardy, Winterbottom’s brings it all to bear with a power only great filmmakers could do.

The pulse of the film beats all the way to the final frames. The last shot, a stunner, sums up the all consuming power of wealth which so easily corrupts the feeble minds of men.

In a new era of epic filmmaking where elements like snow, fire, background actors are ‘enhanced’ with computers, The Claim feels like a throwback epic, and perhaps the last of its kind.

Monday, 3 May 2010

Hot Docs 2010: LIFE WITH MURDER

A Life With Murder (2010) dir. John Kastner
Documentary

***1/2

By Alan Bacchus

A number of great documentaries have been about true crime, and the conflicts facing the Jenkins’ family do not get more complex and fascinating than this.

Ten years ago humble suburban parents of two, Brian and Leslie Jenkins suffered the worst possible crime. In the middle of the afternoon, their teenaged daughter Jennifer was found shot, lying dead by multiple bullet wounds in the basement of their own home – a home invasion perhaps? Armed robbery? After a detailed investigation Jenkins’ son and Jennifer's older brother Mason was arrested and convicted for the murder.

Ten years later, Mason still pleads his innocence and hs parents continue to believe him despite being ostracized and shunned by mostly everyone in their community. Now, Mason is granted visitation rights which means the family can be reunited in a domesticated (though monitored) prison setting just like 'old times'.

Like some of the best true crime documentaries, ‘Dear Zachary’, ‘The Thin Blue Line’, ‘Paradise Lost,’ Kastner parses out his information carefully. Mason comes off as a normal guy – by our first impression we’re actually shocked that he could even be accused of murder. But with the overwhelming evidence stacked up against him, the idea of the trying to have a regular conversation with niceties and pleasantries knowing they're talking to the convicted murderer of their daughter is frightening.

Intercut with the present Kastner goes back to retrace the steps of the case and with Mason’s parents reliving the grisly details of the murder. Kastner even gets his hands on the police interrogation tapes of Mason and his parents being questioned mere days after the murder. The energy and emotional reactions expressed are astoundingly raw, a rare omniscient glimpse into the reactions of people to such heinous tragedy.

As we learn more about the case and see how guilty Mason looks, Kastner puts lays out this earth-shattering conundrum right in front of his parents to face.

Their reactions are not as one would think, and with a twist not even the most melodramatic mystery novel plotting could make believable. It’s a head scratching decision these normal people are forced to make? Disown their own son and thus completely destroy what’s left of their family, or perhaps forgive and try to find some semblance of a functional life together. After all, we have only one life on this earth and their choice remarkably allows them to maintain their sanity, their family, however sorrowful and tragic, and most of important of all, inner peace.

“A Life With Murder” is currently playing at the Hot Docs Film Festival in Toronto

Friday, 30 April 2010

Project Grizzly

Project Grizzly (1996) dir. Peter Lynch
Documentary

****

By Alan Bacchus

There’s something about grizzly bears that just make people go mad. Lynch’s masterpiece documentary, ‘Project Grizzly’ would make a good companion piece to Werner Herzog’s equally great though more well-known ‘Grizzly Man’. Both films tells stories of psychologically-challenged mad men, who, in the name of science, are as much in search of personal fame as they are the research they purport to be gathering.

Lynch’s hero is Troy Hurtubise, after a chance meeting in the woods with a grizzly bear, which left him mesmerized with the animal, took it upon himself to build a suit of armour impenetrable to bear attacks thus allowing him to study them up close. Lynch joins in Troy’s journey after 10 years of trial and error. In a riotously funny sequence of stock footage we see each of Troy’s previous attempts at making Grizzly armour (signified with a military-style numeral – Mark IV, Mark V, Mark VI etc) fail, and then get improved upon. Troy is a glutton for punishment having guns fired at him, logs dropped on him, even being through thrown down an escarpment – all in the name of science.

Or is it?

Troy is a character, a man with a persona, aware of the camera and people’s impression of him. Fashioning himself as a rugged mountaineer/cowboy/rebel, his attire includes a Davey Crocket buckskin jacket, two huge bowie knives strapped to his chest and leg, a red beret, and moccasins.

Troy talks with the confidence of a mythic wilderness hero, a John Wayne-like legend in his own time. Certainly in his own mind. What Lynch’s miraculously manages to discover, just by having his camera observe without prejudice is the damaged inner soul of Troy – a self-conscious regular Joe, with passive aggressive tendencies which manifest itself as severe delusions of grandeur.

Troy’s coterie of minions only feed his hunger for adulation. His brother and other Canadian hoser buddies idolize him with supreme reverence. As we watch the boys interact and talk tall tales in the local donut shop it might as well be the high school cafeteria, with Troy serving as the alpha-male leading the weaklings along in his travails.

His suit of armour, a mash-up of hockey equipment, scrap metal, and duct tape, stands beside him at all times, like a trophy for him and us to admire and perhaps distract from the inner sadness which quietly plagues him.

In discussing the film with Lynch at my most recent Canadian Cinema in Revue screening he confirms the finer and fascinating details of Troy’s personality. Peter admits he could have painted a portrait which would have made the audience hate the character. But, like all great documentaries, Lynch’s film is his impression of the man – not the full story, but one impression.

What we see is a man with hubris is as large as Captain Ahab, and perhaps with more perseverance. His journey, not unlike Moby Dick, at once admirably in his determination and guile, but sadly comes off as delusions of grandeur.

Friday, 23 April 2010

Control Alt Delete

Control Alt Delete (2010) dir. Cameron Labine
Starring: Tyler Labine, Sonja Bennett, Geoff Gustafson, Keith Dallas, Alisen Down

**1/2

By Alan Bacchus

Cameron Labine’s directorial debut, opening this weekend in limited release in Vancouver is another entry in the long line of Canadian sex comedies. Everyone has a fetish, and Labine decides to give his lead character, Lewis, one of the sickest and most headturning - sex and desktop computers. Wait, let me clarify sex with desktop computers. It’s a wild ridiculous concept, something which could only be gotten away with in Canada or Scandinavia. Unfortunately, despite the concept the film has difficulties sustaining its humour beyond its festish raunchiness.

The running theme of “Control Alt Delete” is fetish and how our insecurities about them can cause us to do some pretty outrageous and silly things to cover them up. This is what happens to Lewis Henderson (Tyler Labine), our portly computer programmer hero. It’s December 1999 and Lewis works in a company devoted to fixing the “Y2K” bug for its clients. He’s successful at his job, but his domestic life is in shambles. Lewis can’t perform sexually with his girlfriend Sarah (“Ready or Not’s” Laura Bertram, whom see in a 69 position as the first shot in the film – awesome!). Lewis retreats to sneaky porn-watching in the middle of the night to jerk off. But not even that can get him off.

The only thing that turns him on is his computer. So why not fuck it? Lewis literally drills a hole in the side of his PC and fucks his computer. It’s one of the most ridiculously absurd moments in film I’ve seen. Lewis takes his fetish to work and starts drilling holes and screwing other computers in the office late at night. Meanwhile, Lewis starts up a relationship with the office wallflower Angela (Alisen Down) who proves to be more liberal in bed than her conservative demeanour would suggest. Lewis’ career becomes threatened though when the office douchebag who’s investigating the serial computer-fucker gets close to exposing Lewis. Lewis is forced to confront and accept his own responsibility and his own fetish in order to right everything that’s wrong.

Labine’s film appears to be born from the singular concept of a man fucking a computer. Unfortunately slapped onto this gag is a note for note recycling of Mike Judge’s “Office Space” which casts a shadow over the entire film. “Office Space” shouldn’t make other office comedies out of bounds, but there’s very little that differentiates the two films. In addition to bottling Judge's absurd/satirical tone, each character seems like an overly familiar fusion of Judge's characters, with some slight tweeks to the extreme. Angela, the office manager (Alisen Down), operates in the same manner as the excruciating Lumbergh. Down adds a nervous behavioral twitch, which, in it’s extremity becomes annoying very quickly. Lapine even has a running gag with the character’s names. Everyone’s last name ends in ‘son’- Frederickson, Gustafson, Medelsson – perhaps borrowing from the identity confusion gag in “American Psycho”.

The fetish gag is hung on a traditional romantic comedy structure. Thankfully lead actor Tyler Labine, known for his work on “Reaper”, is an oddly lovable hero (also check him out in 'Tucker and Dale Vs. Evil' this summer). Despite his reprehensible behaviour, including the computer-fucking, the screen loves the man and we desperately want him to get the girl and defeat his douchebag rival. His leading lady Sonja Bennett (last seen in “Young People Fucking”) gives Jane a more aloof personality, but she is also highly watchable and girl-next-door alluring.

“Control Alt Delete” is not this year’s “Young People Fucking”, but it’s good see there’s still more enthusiastic sex comedy filmmakers emerging in Canadian cinema. Enjoy.

'Control Alt Delete' opens theatrically this weekend in Vancouver only via E1 Entertainment.

Wednesday, 17 March 2010

Prom Night in Mississippi

Prom Night in Mississippi (2009) dir. Paul Saltzman
Documentary

***

By Alan Bacchus

The citizens of Charleston, Mississippi remind me of those stories you’ve heard about stranded Japanese WWII soldiers on remote Pacific Islands, who ‘never got the memo’, and continued to think the War was still on years after the fact. At the time of the making of this film 2008, this small city of 20,000 in the heart of the old confederate South continued to function as a near-racially segregated community. Canadian director Paul Saltzman aims his camera at Charleston high school who somehow continued an atrocious tradition of having two separate proms, a white prom and a black prom.

Almost too impossible to believe - in this day and age, in a bastion of freedom, the United States of America, an activity like this goes on. The effort to integrate is given a very strong push by none other than Morgan Freedom, who is embarrassed by his hometown’s inability to see the field from the trees. Freeman addresses the senior class and questions them on why they continue such policies. Everyone says, it’s the parents, who harbour latent racial tendencies from the pre-Civil Rights Movement days. So Freeman proposes that the students organize their own integrated prom and that Freeman pays for it.

It would seem like an easy solution – having an endorsement from a successful Hollywood movie star, having a blank cheque to make it all happen, not to mention having it all documented for the entire world to see as a feature documentary. Well, this was actually the second offer Freeman has made, the first time in 1997 where it was rejected. This time, the students embrace the opportunity to erase this tradition and make it right.

As the school year progresses, shockingly a silent majority protests, the racist parents of the children organize a separate white prom, thus keeping alive their appalling practice. Saltzman’s gregarious characters made up of students, teachers, and local politicians are lively and frank, and speak from the heart. It’s wonderful mix of the familiar high school personalities, jocks, geeks, princesses who band together in the name of civil unity.

But the biggest missed opportunity is the inability of Saltzman to interview the advocates of the segregation. Saltzman finds one parent, a self-professed redneck, who dislikes his daughter dating a black man, but is not against an integrated prom. Even the participants acknowledge that finding parents to publicly admit to their highly unpopular opinions on camera would be near suicidal. In many ways not this works for the film. This unseen majority acts like a shadowy spectre over the town and the film, a shadow which not even the racially accepting students can get from under.

The film climaxes with a rousing party scene at the integrated prom where the events goes off without a hitch, without the threat of violence some thought might arise. We see participants joyously exclaim racial unity and group love. Yet the film doesn’t quite capture or capitalize on the sad irony of this ending. In the final group photo we only see a small group of white students, which means, despite the accepting the call for action by Freeman at the beginning, most of them would appear to have succumbed to the pressure of their parents either to a) not attend the integrated prom or b) not appear in the group photo.

Despite this claim at victory, I’d say it’s more a sad defeat for the community, where the racist white parents managed to keep the white prom tradition alive, and an even greater defeat, the fact that most of the protesting white students actually attended that event. Either way these complex ambiguities make the film fascinating on levels.

Tuesday, 16 March 2010

Reel Injun

Reel Injun (2009) dir. Neil Diamond
Documentary

***1/2

By Alan Bacchus

North American Aboriginals have a long history with cinema, just about as long as the medium has existed. If you consider the ‘Western’ cinema’s most venerable genre in the century’s most influential form of storytelling then it’s easy to see how much damage Hollywood’s depiction has done to the mainstream perception of the Indian people. I use the word ‘Indian’ not in a derogatory way. Though, it’s not the politically correct word this egregiously erroneous term which had stuck through our language continues to be used by their own people. But it’s part of the down to earth quality which the participants in this film bring to their self-analysis.

Canadian Aboriginal director Neil Diamond uses a familiar first person narrative format through which to frame this very large story, pointing the camera at himself to chart his own journey of self-discovery. He tells us of his childhood when he used to watch Westerns movies and TV shows and found himself always cheering for the 'Cowboys' as opposed to the “Indians’ – yet not recognizing that he, himself, was one of these Indians. While it’s a probably bit of an exagerration it he demonstrates just how wrong the entrenched depiction of his people were on the big screen.

As Diamond hops on the road in an old beat up roadster (affectionately referred to us as a 'Rez car'), he brings the audience back through time and charts the temptestuous relationship of Indians and Hollywood.

Diamond finds all the right footage and participants to tell his story from a number of intriguing angles. A number of Aboriginal leaders, film critics, poets, authors and intellectuals take us through 100 years of cinema. For the Hollywood point of view Diamond even meets up with Jim Jarmusch and Clint Eastwood for their opinions. Ironically we learn in the early silent era Indians were often characterized as the hero, with much reverence shown for the traditions of the culture. But as esteemed Canadian film critic and Ojibwa Nation member Jesse Wente expresses, it was John Ford’s ‘Stagecoach’ (1939) which set everything back and laid a foundation of cinematic mistreatment.

Diamond keeps a light and refreshing sense of humour through everything. One of worst cultural mistakes which permeated into mainstream culture is the idea that Indians wear headbands – a mistruth which came about from the need of the actors to prevent their wigs from falling off during action sequences. Same with the feathered war headdress which was ubiquitously applied to any Indian in the movies.

The film flows in and out of the predictable timeline of cinema history. A good deal of time is spent on the political history of the First Nations, which began in the hippie 60’s when Indian culture became ‘fashionable’ again, and climaxing with the Wounded Knee revolt. Of course Wounded Knee links up with the legendary Sacheen Littlefeather speech in place of Marlon Brando in 1973. Littlefeather who appears in an interview even clears up some of the political discreditation against her which continued to this day – the idea that she was a fake, and not a ‘real’ aboriginal at all.

In fact, a number of the most famous Indians in cinema history were adopted into the culture. One of the most touching stories is of Iron Eyes Cody, one of the most famous Indian actors who appeared in over 100 films, yet was of Italian descent. The effect of his roles in his own family continue to be felt, later in life self-identifying with the First Nations, marrying an aboriginal woman and becoming patriarch to a culturally-aware aboriginal family.

Diamond ends off the film bringing us to the present, where we find ourselves in a Golden Age of Aboriginal Filmmaking. Diamond, Wente and most of the pundits (and myself included) consider Zacharias Kunuk’s “Atanarjuat: The Fast Runner” is the first ever truly indigenous mainstream film.

'Reel Injun' should be required viewing not just for cineastes but to educators and children. Diamond has created a remarkable statement of history within the context of this highly discriminatory and unregulated teaching tool known as cinema.

Sunday, 14 March 2010

The Rocket

The Rocket (2005) dir. Charles Binamé
Starring: Roy Dupuis, Stephen McHattie, Remy Girard

***

By Alan Bacchus

The successful Maurice Richard film from 2005 gets another DVD release from Alliance films, this time dressed up with an accompanying NFB documentary from 1998, also entitled ‘The Rocket’ as the second disc special feature. Considering the worship hockey fans and Quebeckers in general still hold for the man, Binamé’s dramatization idolizes and the hockey great with near-saintly deification.

In traditional biopic fashion the film charts the life and career of the man from his humble working class life to his ascension as the best player in the game. All the touchstone events in his career are hit and handled with great care and emotional poignancy – his first season with the club, and his early injury problems, his 50 goal season and his suspension and the subsequent riots which ensued. In particular, his very public chastising of the league’s racism against French Canadians, which could be seen as a germ for the Separatist Movement, puts his career into an even deeper context and significance for the country.

Unfortunately the film is often let down by the abrupt transitions between these benchmark moments which an elegant montage or two could have smoothed over. The film should be cherished and celebrated for its stunning visual recreation of the 1940’s/50’s hockey milieu. Pierre Gill’s cinematography is simply some of the finest images ever shot in Canada. Recreating a 1940’s hockey game with the pinpoint period accuracy needed to satisfy a highly discriminating hockey-loving audience on a limited Canadian film budget is no small task. But these sequences are so astounding they accurately capture not only the artistry of Richard on ice, but the sounds, smells and even the chilliness of the old Montreal forum.

Thus ‘The Rocket’ is arguably the final word of Canadian hockey on film. Jacques Payette’s accompanying NFB doc is decent, if a little dated by the standard of today’s more polished and flashier documentaries. But it works well as a companion to the dramatic film, reflections from Richard and his contemporaries looking back on Richard’s influence on the game. Other special features includes a number of deleted scenes and a featurette.