DAILY FILM DOSE: A Daily Film Appreciation and Review Blog: Anthony Mann
[go: up one dir, main page]

Showing posts with label Anthony Mann. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Anthony Mann. Show all posts

Monday, 10 May 2010

El Cid

El Cid (1961) dir. Anthony Mann
Starring: Charlton Heston, Sophia Loren

***1/2

By Alan Bacchus

“El Cid” was made at the height of the epic-period in Hollywood. In the early 60’s with the increasing popularity of TV Hollywood endeavoured to make bigger and longer movies to get audiences out of their homes and back into the theatres for an experience they couldn’t get on the small screen (hmm, things haven’t changed much since then). This caused a trend in making giant, expensive, lengthy blockbusters, with huge casts, huge running times, with widescreen photography. This golden age lasted approximately from 1956 – 1964 and saw the annual smut of epics that included “Ben Hur”, “Spartacus”, Lawrence of Arabia”, “King of Kings”, “Around the World in 80 Days” and “Cleopatra” - some were great, some were mediocre and of course, many were bad. One of the best and under appreciated was “El Cid” – a non Hollywood film – financed and produced entirely with European money by super-producer Samuel Bronston.

In medieval Spain 1000+AD Spain is under constant conflict with the aggressive Moors – the Muslim Africans– both living in Spain and those across the Atlantic. Charlton Heston plays Rodrigo Diaz, one of Spain’s great knights. Diaz falls out of favour of Ferdinand’s royal court when he frees a group of captured Moors. But Diaz’s kindness and civility with the Moors creates a groundswell of support for the exiled warrior, and from the eyes of people Diaz becomes ‘El Cid’ (the Lord). Diaz redeems himself with the royals and leads the patriotic charge against the oncoming Moor Army from the south.

Diaz is the typical hero – inadvertently drawn into conflict and battle, but resolute in his commitment to his people and country. Much of the conflict is between his fiancĂ©/wife (Sophia Loren), who wishes to live a humble life with Diaz. But the genre demands a hero who goes from ordinary man to legend to martyr and finally to myth. Diaz moves through all these stages and finishes the film with a rousing send off worthy of any of the aforementioned battle epics.

Nothing frustrates me more than an epic that extends its running time with uninteresting sword & sandal dialogue cooped up in studio interior scenes. The wideangle frame constantly craves the big scale and big spectacle. “Spartacus” and “Ben Hur” often suffer from this. But “El Cid” rarely stays in the same location and rarely stays indoors. For most of the time Heston is outside on his horse against deep vistas of expansive lands.

It’s refreshing to watch tangible productive value on the screen, as opposed to post-production CGI which is now a cost-effective way of tricking us. Mann stages a dozen major set pieces featuring hundred, if not thousands, of extras. The attack on Valencia occurs on a long stretch of beach against the backdrop of the Mediterranean Sea and a grand castle on a hilltop in the background. There’s no doubting the castle, the water, the horses and the warriors are all real and no amount of CGI will ever replace the real thing. Another glorious scene is Diaz’s dramatic joust to the death set against another magnificent medieval castle. “El Cid” isn’t without its banal dialogue scenes, but it’s kept to the bare minimum to push the story through to the set pieces, which drives the story.

On the downside, I don’t know if it’s the cinematography or the DVD transfer but the film looks aged – too aged and dated for a 70mm film. This era of colour photography often had problems with contrasty imaging and lack of depth and detailing. “El Cid” is big and has fine composition, but it never looks beautiful, as say, “Lawrence of Arabia”, which was made one year later.

It’s fitting the new DVD box set is as big as the movie. Alliance Films' 3-DVD set looks impressive on my DVD shelf. The sand-textured box, which matches well my “Lawrence of Arabia” set, contains two books, authentically recreated original production notes and a graphic novel (comic strip in those days) version of the film. Also included is a well-written essay from Martin Scorsese and a set of ‘lobby’ cards (what do you with these DVD lobby cards, anyway?)

You'll be doing yourself a disservice if you get caught up in the political correctness or try to find parallels to today's global political climate. Don't judge the filmmakers on who they chose to be the 'good guys' and the 'bad guys'. "El Cid" is not to be over-intellectualized - just watch the film.

“El Cid 3-Disc Set” is available on DVD from Alliance Films.

Wednesday, 18 June 2008

THE FAR COUNTRY


The Far Country (1955) dir. Anthony Mann
Starring: James Stewart, Ruth Roman, Walter Brennon, Corine Calvet

***

Jimmy Stewart wasn’t known for his westerns, but in fact he made many in the genre, including five with director Anthony Mann. “The Far Country” was his last collaboration with Mann, a prototypical genre film, fulfilling all expectations and even giving us a bit more than we’d usually get.

Jimmy plays Jeff Webster, an opportunist who, with his partner Ben Tatum (Walter Brennon), travel north to capitalize on the Klondike boom. Their prized possession is a herd of cattle which they hope to sell in Dawson City to fund their dream ranch in Utah. Plans are halted in Skagway when the duo run into the self-made lawman Gannon who rules his town like a tyrannical despot. But in Jeff Webster, Gannon has met his match.

Gannon is jailed on a trumped-up charge, but manages to get released and save his herd. On the way to Dawson City a quid pro quo of actions escalate into an all out war between the citizens of Dawson City and Gannon’s group of evil strongmen. Gannon, who prefers to protect his own back, is conflicted to go against his personal scruples and fight someone else's battle.

"The Far Country" is one of the best examples of the Western genre. Jeff is the typical genre protagonist, a semi-nomadic loner/drifter with his own personal code of honour. In fact, he’s wanted for murder, and when he’s confronted about it, he says, “I shot him, because he shot at me”. Webster prefers the company of himself and his best pal Tatum and refuses help or to be helped, “I don't need other people. I don't need help. I can take care of me.”

Writer Borden Chase is not subtle with Jeff's traits, but it’s important to be clear about who his character is – after all its Jimmy Stewart playing against type (the exact opposite of George Bailey). The internal conundrum Jeff is faced with at the end resonates deeper when he decides to altruistically stand up for the innocents.

Jimmy Stewart performs admirably as the thick skinned but honourable bullhead. His best scene is when Marshal Rube Morris confronts Gannon and his thugs in Dawson City. Rube is clearly in over his head facing off against the tough guys – Webster recognizes this and Jimmy Stewart’s face registers all the words necessary to describe his character's internal conflict. I generally prefer the aged Stewart, with his graying hair and crow's feet, which makes for seems to make for a more complex character. "The Far Country" is one of his best mid-career performances.

The film also charts a poignant subplot about his relationship with his best friend Ben. They are like father and son, but Webster is the leader and Ben has followed him around on his various schemes and adventures without complaint. And so, when Ben confesses to wanting to move on without Webster it’s a strong unspoken moment.

This is the strength of "The Far Country”. The awesome scenery (shot in Jasper Park in Alberta) commands most of the praise, but there’s a lot going on between the lines and a surprising amount of subtle subtext in a genre which is typically on the nose and action-oriented. Enjoy.

“The Far Country” is available on DVD in The James Stewart Westerns Collection available from Universal Studios Home Entertainment

Wednesday, 28 May 2008

THE FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE


The Fall of the Roman Empire (1964) dir. Anthony Mann
Starring: Sophia Loren, Stephen Boyd, Alec Guinness, Christopher Plummer

***1/2

“The Fall of the Roman Empire” has been one of more famous colossal failures in Hollywood history. Samuel Bronston produced the film on the heels of the success of his previous gargantuan undertaking, “El Cid”. “Fall” was even bigger than “El Cid”. Along with “Cleopatra” it helped spell the death of epic sword and sandal films of the late 50’s, early 60’s. Watching the film with today’s eyes it’s a glorious experience. Bigger truly is better with massive real world sets, thousands of extras, and horses, and shot in ultra-Panavision 70mm.

The opening monologue sets the time and place. The narrator admits the fall of the real Empire was a lengthy, ‘slow-burning’ process, but the film tells of a specific time where the political follies of the day were representative of the downfall. It's 180AD during the transition from the great Emperor Marcus Aurilius (Alec Guinness) to his obnoxious tyrannical son, Commodus (Christopher Plummer). If these names ring a bell, they’re the same characters from Ridley Scott’s "Gladiator", as played by Richard Harris and Joaquin Phoenix. In Northern Spain Marcus Aurilius has assembled representatives from all the Roman territories and has called for peace, ushering in his 'Pax Romana'.

But Aurilius is ill and doesn’t have long to live. He makes a brash decision to make his loyal military commander Livius (Stephen Boyd) heir to his throne. Unfortunately Livius happens to be best friends with Aurilius’ son Commodus. This causes a feud between the friends which will cause the chaotic infighting which would help bring down the Empire. When Aurilius passes on, Commodus takes command away from Livius. While negotiating the complex politics, Livius desperately tries to find love with Commodus' sister Lucilla (Sophia Loren) whom Aurilius had sent to Armenia to marry it’s Prince. Commodus’ mind gets crazier and crazier resulting in complete chaos and the beginning of the end for Rome.

The film is structured in two halves. The first half, set in the glorious mountains of Northern Spain, is a breezy 90mins which set up the character, conflict and action of the second. It’s also the most engrossing thanks to Alec Guinness’ wonderful performance as Emperor Aurilius. His conflict is internal as he’s forced to put the needs of the State ahead of his family. Aurilius must sacrifice his family bond in order to set an example for how Rome should be run when he passes on.

The second half of the film moves to Rome. A full scale replica of the Roman Forum was built in Madrid. It was so massive and detailed it became a tourist attraction after the filming. For the final chaotic jubilee scene, director Mann assembled thousands of extras to fill the set. The elative jubilation of the drunken crowd plays against the emotional trauma of Commodus’s witch-hunt. It's a startling scene of organized chaos.

While Plummer plays a great crazed baddie, Stephen Boyd can't carry the hero-torch passed down from Alec Guinness. His handsome matinee-idol good looks doesn't keep with the acting talents of his co-stars. And even with the three hour running time some of many plotlines are inadequately fleshed out. Specifically Anthony Quayle’s character Verulus who is Commodus’ gladiator commander. Though he appears in a couple scenes training with Commodus, nothing sets up the shocking twist finale. As well Omar Sharif’s Somhamus character, the Armenian prince whom Lucilla is married off to, is never even given a close-up and barely 4 or 5 lines of dialogue.

But it's the grand spectacle that triumphs over character. The production design and cinematography is breathtaking. Since it was shot in 70mm, the image is a sharp and clean, with every detail in the frame discernable. Watch Aurilius’ funeral scene. Shot in a light snow fall, the flakes of white contrast the black uniforms of the soldiers, and black smoke from the lit fires in the background. And off in the distance, hundreds of torches create immaculately textured depth to the frame – a clear influence on Ridley Scott’s version of the film.

“The Fall of the Roman Empire” should certainly not serve as research for your school paper. Historical accuracy took a backseat to spectacle, and Sam Bronston delivered his one of the greatest epic films. The film has never received the respect it deserves. But with Hollywood history behind us, it’s time to put the film into the upper echelon of grand epics. Enjoy.

"The Fall of the Roman Empire" is available on 3-Disc Special Edition DVD from the Weinstein Company in the U.S. and Alliance Films in Canada.