DAILY FILM DOSE: A Daily Film Appreciation and Review Blog: 'Pasukaru Reviews
[go: up one dir, main page]

Showing posts with label 'Pasukaru Reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 'Pasukaru Reviews. Show all posts

Monday, 9 February 2009

TOP TEN LOW BUDGET FILMS UNDER $500,000


Guest commentary by Pasukaru

If you’re a struggling filmmaker, most likely what’s constantly on your mind is finding an idea that would make a great low budget film. The DIY indie has launched the careers of many great filmmakers. Maxing credit cards, borrowing from friends, that rich dentist uncle of yours, and guerrilla location shooting are all part of the financing game of low budget filmmaking. To reduce costs DIY films need to minimize its characters, isolate its locations, and certainly minimize stunts, special effects, pyrotechnics etc.

Filmmakers should always be looking back at the successful ones for inspiration, and learning tools for how to maximize your money. Here are some of the finest, most influential, little known and, well, personal favourites.

But before the list, it’s important to point out a number of key films that are great low budget films that, to the dismay of the author, were a bit too expensive to make the list, but deserve mentioning:

Repulsion ($300,000 in 1965 = $2million today)
The Evil Dead ($375,000 in 1980 equals roughly $960,000 today)
Mad Max ($350,000 in 1979 equals roughly $1million today)
Halloween ($325,000 in 1978 equals roughly $1million today)
Shivers ($179,000 in 1975 equals roughly $700,000 today)
Easy Rider ($340,000 in 1969 equals roughly $2million today!)
Mean Streets ($500,000 in 1973 equals roughly $2.3million today)
Targets ($130,000 in 1968 equals roughly $790,000 today)
May ($500,000 in 2002 equals roughly $589,000 today)

Lastly, all these figures are gathered unscientifically via the IMDB, Box Office etc.

1. KILLER’S KISS (1955)


$40,000 = $316,000 today

I was pleasantly surprised, when adjusted to inflation, that Stanley Kubrick’s breakout low-budget feature film could be included on the list. The gritty film-noir was produced when Kubrick was only 26 years and on welfare. It was shot for merely $40,000, which was borrowed from an uncle that owned a drug store. Kubrick was a one-man film crew (long before Robert Rodriguez would claim the title); he wrote, produced, directed, photographed, and edited. The film used a naturalistic style, which was unconventional for the genre. Nonetheless, having used the legendary Arriflex 35IIA and a springwound Eyemo camera, Kubrick incorporated a rugged hand-held look that would later become commonplace in independent film. Without permits to shoot in one of the world’s busiest cities, the young maverick would shoot exteriors secretly from nearby vehicles and use a truck in place of a dolly. Moreover, Kubrick had fired the sound-man and was forced to shoot the entire film without sound and needed to post-sync all of the dialogue and sound effects. Despite all these limitations, Killer’s Kiss would eventually become a significant part of the Kubrick oeuvre.

2. ERASERHEAD (1977)


$100,000 = $350,000 today

David Lynch’s debut is a surreal freak show that at once baffled and amazed audiences. A twenty-page script created piecemeal over five years, Eraserhead was finally released as a midnight movie and would later become a cult classic. Speaking of Kubrick, he had supposedly shown Eraserhead to his cast before making The Shining in hopes to convey the appropriate atmosphere. The film does not have a coherent plot; rather, it is a series of nightmarish sequences. Interestingly at the time, despite its avant-garde qualities, the Hollywood filmmaker elite, such as Terrence Malick, George Lucas, and Mel Brooks, was championing Eraserhead around town. The genius was apparent. The subject of endless interpretation, Eraserhead has solidified its place in American cinema when it was selected for preservation in the National Film Registry. Respect.

3. PI (1997)


$60,000 = $80,000 today

Eraserhead had obviously influenced Darren Aronofsky when he set out to make his micro-budget tour-de-force, Pi. To finance his film, Aronofsky sold $100 shares of the film to family and friends (he eventually paid them all back with a $50 profit per-share). This stylish black and white film captivated audiences with its creative use of sound and hip-hop montages. It is credited for popularizing, though not invent, the reverse first-person perspective, or the “snoricam”, by physically mounting the camera on the actor, which would subsequently be seen in every commercial and music video. Guerilla tactics in making the film included shooting without permits and using real human brains. Aronofsky would win the Directing Award at the 1998 Sundance Film Festival, and the Independent Spirit Award for Best First Screenplay. Pi exemplifies how a low budget can be overcome with cinematic creativity. It all paid off, as Artisan picked it up for a million bucks.

4. EL MARIACHI (1992)


$7,000 (+$220,000 in post) = $342,500 today

Cue the Rebel Without A Crew. Robert Rodriguez became an overnight sensation and hero to legions of young filmmakers when his micro-budget action film hit the scene. The 23-year-old filmmaker was producer, director, writer, special-effect man, editor, etc. El Mariachi is famously known for being shot for $7,000 with money raised by volunteering as a laboratory guinea pig. Most of budget was spent on film stock and processing, so there was roughly $600 left to “put on screen”. In fact, to save film Rodriguez only shot one take for every scene, never used a slate, used a wheelchair in lieu of a dolly, and used desk lamps for lighting. Ultimately, El Mariachi is an important touchstone in the American independent film movement of the early ‘90s showing how, with a little money and a lot of effort, it was possible to make a successful and popular film: "creativity, not money, is used to solve problems". And if you thought shooting the film was difficult, read the book “Rebel Without a Crew”, and you’ll discover his even more arduous process of sound editing once the film got picked up for distribution.


5. THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE (1974)


$84,000 (disputed) = $360,000 today

Arguably one of the most terrifying and influential horror films of all time, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre was financed on the profits of the most successful adult film of all time (Deep Throat). The film made about $30 million in the United States, making it one of the most successful independent films at the time. Due to budget limitations, there were few special effects (the blood used was real). Tobe Hooper even had his actress actually cut her index finger with a razor. That’s hardcore. Despite strong criticism for its graphic content, the film triumphs by being nearly bloodless in its depiction of violence. TCM would eventually become the template for countless horror films and an American horror classic.


6. CUBE (1997)


$375,000 = $495,000 today

Popular for its Twilight Zone inspired storyline and Kafkaesque setting, Cube is the only Canadian film on the list, and arguably one of the best films from the country. Directed by Vincenzo Natali, the film was produced through the renowned Feature Film Project via the Canadian Film Centre on a small soundstage - the film uses only one set: a cube-shaped room, measuring 14’ by 14’ for the entire running time. The filmmakers would transition to other cubic rooms by swapping different colored gel panels. Cube would win over legions of fans and become a box-office hit in Europe and Japan. Its reputation would only grow.

7. FOLLOWING (1998)


$6,000 = $7,600 today

A mere 10 years before Christopher Nolan would go on to be a fanboy, god thanks to The Dark Knight, he made a no-budget film noir called The Following. It was made with friends, in black and white 16mm film, on weekends over the course of a year. Filmed on the streets of London and in the homes of friends and family, the project was meant to cost as little as possible. Nolan would rehearse at length to be sure he got what he needed in one or two takes. He used only available light and had no gear to speak of. The strength, therefore, remains in the story. Using an elliptical narrative style that Nolan would continue to employ later, the film keeps you engrossed till the end. The result was an award-winning low budget masterpiece that would usher in one of today’s biggest Hollywood directors.

8. PRIMER (2004)


$7,000 = $7,400 today

Like “El Mariachi”, this high concept no-budget sci-fi thriller is the stuff of indie dreams. Produced for an extremely low 7K on 16mm amid the digital revolution, Primer collected the Grand Jury Prize at Sundance. Shane Carruth had been a former engineer who quit his job to make a film - a risky venture considering he had not even made a short film before. Nonetheless, with intense research he taught himself not only how to direct, but do the cinematography, sound recording, editing, sound editing and everything else involved with the craft. Oh yeah, he was also the lead actor and composed the music. Carruth didn't leave himself any room for error either. He used a 1:1 shooting ratio, which means every foot of film shot ended up in the final cut. At one point you can even see Carruth on camera as actor calling cut in the shot. Amazing.

9. THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT (1999)


$22,000 = $27,000 today

It’s easy to forget what a phenomenon this film was when it came out. Made for a ridiculous $22,000, this film rocked the box office grossing $248 million worldwide, became the most profitable film of all time, and popularized the faux-documentary genre film. Blair Witch is also known for its groundbreaking internet viral marketing campaign, which suggested the film was real and elevated the hype to an unprecedented level prior to its release. Blair Witch was a benchmark in digital film history, inspiring many filmmakers with a 'if they can do it, I can do it.' attitude.

10. IN THE COMPANY OF MEN


$25,000 = $32,000 today

“In the Company of Men” stands out because it’s the most traditional narrative film of them all, yet wholly unique and creative. Successful low budget features have tended to be genre films, with high concepts or marketable hooks. Words on a page are always the most accessible and cheapest tool for a filmmaker. Neil La Bute’s first film uses words like daggers. A cynical and sadistic film about two uber-male businessmen on a mission of misogynistic psychological abuse. Aaron Eckhart's 'Chad' character is often cited as one of cinema's great villains. With minimal locations and actors, the sparseness of the production gave it a unique tone of isolation and danger.  Each scene is shot with a minimum number of camera angles framed with a clever eye for composition.

Ok, before everyone gets in a huff, here are a number of other low budget films, which are successful and influential in their own right, that didn’t quite make this list.

Clerks (1994) – $27,000 (+$230,00 in post) = $375,000 today
Assault on Precinct 13 (1976) $100,000 = $372,000
Bad Taste (1987) - $25,000 (+$230,00 in post) = $475,000 today
Little Shop of Horrors (1960) - $30,000 = $216,000 today
She’s Gotta Have it (1986) - $175,000 = $339,000 today
Who’s That Knocking At My Door (1968) - $75,000 = $456,000 today
Last House on the Left (1972) - $87,000 = $440,000 today
Brick (2006) - $450,000
Napoleon Dynamite (2004) - $400,000
Ms. 45 (1981) - $62,000 = $144,000 today
Pink Flamingos (1972) - $12,000 = $60,000 today
Faster Pussy Cat! Kill! Kill! (1965) - $45,000 = $300,000
The Brothers McMullan (1995) - $24,000 = $32,300
Slacker (1991) - $23,000 = $35,000
John Cassavetes' Shadows(1959) - ???

Saturday, 31 January 2009

TOP TEN TELEVISION OF 2008


Guest commentary by Matt Reid

I started this annual TV summary a few years ago when I noticed a number of friends sending Top 10 Movies and/or Music lists at year end, so thought I'd throw my hat in the ring. Why so late? Well, it probably means I'm busier and/or lazier this year, but we won't dwell on that (hey, at least it's not February, right?)What qualifies me, you ask? I guess nothing more than the fact that maybe I watch too much TV.

First off, a couple notes & sub-categories for this year's list:

The programs on my list were ones that I (personally) watched in 2008 (some people may have seen them in 2007, but due to my lack of Pay TV, I may have watched later than some of you)

This also means there are shows that aired this year that I haven't seen yet (e.g. Season 3 of Dexter) so I can't put that on until next year's list

Another perennial favourite missing this year: Friday Night Lights (Season 2 was on the 2007 list and Season 3 just started, so it will have to wait for next year)

Best Use of PVR Award:
SNL - nothing is better than skipping through a too-long skit or terrible musical performance to find the truly funny nuggets hiding in there

2009 Top 10 Futures Award (for new shows with promise that aren't quite top 10 worthy yet):
Fringe, Life on Mars

Summer Guilty Pleasure Award:
Swingtown

Hoping That It Can Rebound Award:
Heroes (here's hoping the new volume starting next week will feel Bryan Fuller's returning influence sooner rather than later)

Getting More & More Ridiculous But I Just Can't Stop Watching Award:
Weeds

5-day-a-week Show Award:
Jeopardy

Canadian Shows I enjoyed this year:
jPod, The Rick Mercer Report

I've Been Watching So Long I Have To Give It An Honourable Mention:
Scrubs

Reality Shows That I've Started Watching Again Due To Some Unknown Influence:
The Amazing Race, Survivor

Now that's those are done, here's the actual Top 10:

10. HOW I MET YOUR MOTHER/BIG BANG THEORY
Two more traditional sitcoms that have found their way through my usual 'laugh track snobbery' armour. HIMYM is my favourite of the two and does a great job of providing a good dose of heart amongst all the great laughs (plus, Neil Patrick Harris's performance is 'legen....wait for it.....dary'). Big Bang is also worth the price of admission for Jim Parson's performance alone

9. DAILY SHOW/COLBERT REPORT
Sad as it is, this is the way I keep up on current U.S. events.....it is the best way to get them though: through a prism of sarcasm and mockery. This election year truly brought out the best in both shows and when they teamed up together for a live show on Election Night, the results were incredible....

8. PUSHING DAISIES
Obviously the last year this show will make the list (which is really too bad), but it's fantastical look, top notch cast and quirky murder mysteries made for a great mid-week pleasure. The upside of the cancellation is Bryan Fuller's return to Heroes. [By the same token, I quite enjoyed Eli Stone, which also was a breath of fresh air but not in the Top 10 as it just wasn't as good as Daisies]

7. THE OFFICE
A perennial Top 10 on my list, they've kept it fresh by shaking things up. Toby's shorter than planned vacation, Pam going to school, Ryan returning at the bottom. Amy Ryan's guest turn as Toby's replacement was a favourite of mine. Not as good: the hour long episodes, which feel a little stretched.....

6. EXTRAS
I watched all of Season 2 and the Finale all together at the start of this year. Ricky Gervais has created another classic character to go right up there with David Brent. The decision between selling out and sticking to your principles makes us all wonder what we'd do in that situation....while keeping us laughing, of course

5. BREAKING BAD
High school teacher dying of cancer sells meth to support his family? Come on, everyone will love that! It may sound like a ridiculous concept, but it's executed so well (most notably by Bryan Cranston, who deservedly won an Emmy for this role) that you can't help but be drawn in. I can't wait for a (full) Season 2 (Season 1 was cut short by the strike) to see what happens next....

4. 30 ROCK
My favourite weekly sitcom continues to win awards and critical praise, but can't quite find that broad audience. Maybe that's a good thing and they'll give up on the big-name guest stars, which is my only real complaint about the show. Just keep the focus on the core cast and you've got so much funny, I often need to watch twice

3. FLIGHT OF THE CONCHORDS
This is one that I'm sure a lot of you saw in 2007....well, I'm not quite lucky enough, so it was a DVD marathon for me. And, wow, I'm glad I did - the struggles of Bret & Jemaine only became funnier when put to music (Murray may just be my favourite though). Getting the album for my iPod allows me to drive along laughing as the Hiphopopotamus takes on the Rhymenoceros...

2. MAD MEN
Brilliant show that got even better in its second season. Now that all the characters have been set up, we're able to dive more into the stories about their fascinating lives. Top notch writing and performances are supported by the gorgeous look of the show and its meticulous attention to details. What's next for the Sterling Cooper group? I can't wait for July to find out.

1. LOST
Back on top again. After changing the entire game in 2007 with the switch to flash forwards, this year took us on an intense adrenaline ride. Mystery? Check. Compelling characters? Check. Action? Check. This show has it all and I can't wait to experience these final two seasons.....which, by the way, I've given up trying to solve all the mysteries. I'm just enjoying the ride now.....

Would love to hear your thoughts on my choices if you so wish to share.....and then we can end up in a vicious, no-holds-barred debate......

Friday, 28 September 2007

TEKKON KINKREET


Tekkon Kinkreet (2006) dir. Michael Arias
Voices by: Kazunari Ninomiya, Yu Aoi, Masahiro Motoki, Min Tanaka

**1/2

Guest review: Pasukaru

“Tekkon Kinkreet” is the directorial debut of Michael Arias, an American living in Japan, which actually makes it first major anime directed by a non-Japanese. His career is linked to major movers and shakers in the industry such as Hayao Miyazaki (“Princess Mononoke”) and the Wachowski Brothers (“Animatrix”). The film is adapted from the early 90’s manga “Black and White” by Taiyo Matsumoto. Despite the pedigree, the film falls short from being a genuine success.

“Tekkon Kinkreet” (a Japanese pun derived from iron-reinforced concrete) is set in - you guessed it - a fantastic urban landscape called Treasure City. It’s a hedonistic playground for everyone from ankle-bitters to old perverts. The narrative follows two street urchins: the hard-hitting ‘Black’ and snot-nosed ‘White’. The city is basically territory for their frivolous gang scraps and petty crimes. Black and White are the thorn in the side of the local yakuza, who can’t catch them as they fly and bounce off rooftops like a couple of maladjusted brats from Neverland. All is fine and dandy for our heroes until a snake-faced outsider, planning to build a sky-scraping kiddy funland, takes over the yakuza operations. Aided by three Terminator-like alien assassins the snakeman faces off against the troublesome street kids in a climatic fight in the gnarly theme park.

The film gets interesting when White is seriously injured and separated from Black. The two kids have a symbiotic relationship, and when torn apart sends Black off the deep-end and White crying annoyingly with no end at all. Black develops a minotaur-faced alter-ego that’s more evil than anything the baddies can throw at them, which Black must confront in the end before it consumes him. This all serves as an interesting allegory for neglected youth and the contradictions of adulthood, making this far more interesting than the rambling plot.

The film is visually impressive, and to some extent experimental. I loved the sprawling funkadelic city and the kinetic action. The aesthetics are a mixture of childlike drawings, sophisticated camera movements, and realistic settings. The blend makes for some pretty awesome stuff. The expressionistic dream sequences are especially noteworthy. Though not new to the genre, “Tekkon Kinkreet” presents a fine balance of mainstream and art-house anime, delivering an auteur-powered piece de resistance… or should I accredit this to the manga?

Are we talking masterpiece? Unfortunately, no. The main plot is unfocused, the kids get irritating at times, and as a whole the film lacks real emotional resonance. Missing was a genuine visceral reaction. The potential for the material to blow my mind made the film all the more disappointing. It’s too little of what you want, and too much of what you don’t want. There are definitely enough marvels to recommend “Tekkon Kinkreet” to anime fans, though your average neophyte might feel indifferent to the whole thing.

Buy it here: Tekkon Kinkreet


Sunday, 13 May 2007

WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO BABY JANE?


Whatever Happened to Baby Jane? (1962) dir. Robert Alrdrich
Starring: Bette Davis, Joan Crawford

****

Guest Review by Pasukaru

Credited as the grand-mother, err, of the psycho-biddy sub-genre (old lady in peril, a.k.a. hagsloitation), “Whatever Happened to Baby Jane?” features two remarkable performances by then over-the-hill screen legends Bette Davis and Joan Crawford. In fact, Davis’ work as Baby Jane Hudson essentially set the bar for all subsequent crazy-lady movies.

And crazy she is. The story goes like this: Baby Jane Hudson had been a former vaudeville child star but was eventually upstaged by her more talented sister, Blanche Hudson, in the ‘30s as she became a famous movie actress. Considering that Baby Jane was a spoiled ungrateful brat, it’s not surprising that she might be a tad jealous of her successful sister. Baby Jane even had life-size dolls produced in her image for her adoring public, but now rest as eerie reminder of past glory. This doll is highlighted in the stylish opening credit sequence when a mysterious accident leaves Blanche Hudson paralyzed from the waist down. Fast forward a few decades and we are introduced to the two sisters in their golden years reminiscing about the good old days. However, for the alcoholic and queen-bitch Baby Jane, Blanche’s television broadcasting of her old film triggers a series of events that drives Baby Jane over the edge.

Bette Davis is spectacular. Some critics have accused her of going over-the-top with the character but she infuses a manic energy that is mesmerizing. Campy? Maybe, but delicious. She oscillates from emotional extremes like a pendulum likely to thrust her into the dark abyss of her mad, mad psyche. She’s a grotesque caricature that makes the audience always feel uneasy. How far will this crazy bitch go? She endlessly tortures her sweet and crippled sister physically and psychologically like a malevolent child would jab an injured bird in a cage. Joan Crawford is also great. Her measured performance really steadies the stage. We truly feel sorry for her. Eventually, when things get out of hand, we’re right there with her.

One of the more memorable scenes has Baby Jane reenacting one of her “famous” numbers for a one-man audience. Her over-done make-up, rickety bones, and broken voice make for an uncomfortably chilling scene. Gave me nightmares.

It’s not without fault, however. The film is over long. The editing could have been tighter, and the score is at times intrusive. The denouement kills the tension and feels unsatisfying, somehow. Still, Robert Aldrich, a versatile and visual filmmaker (see “Kiss Me Deadly”, “The Dirty Dozen”) keeps the gothic horror honest and delivers some hair-raising sequences. This film would later set the template for other crazy-bitch movies like “Misery” and “Carrie”. It’s a genre that hasn’t been over-used in my opinion and I feel a revival is in the works. But I say this with reservation, because it takes guts to do a character like Baby Jane Hudson, and I feel that today’s top actresses are far too vain to take such risks. I hope I’m wrong. Check it out.

Buy it here: What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?



Sunday, 11 February 2007

LONE WOLF & CUB: BABY CART AT THE RIVER STYX


Lone Wolf and Cub: Baby Cart at the River Styx (1972) Dir. Kenji Misumi

****

Guest review by Pasukaru

In the early seventies, Shintaro Katsu, of “Zatoichi” fame, produced a series of samurai films, based on the popular manga “Lone Wolf and Cub,” starring his older brother Tomisaburo Wakayama. These hyper-violent jidaigeki were to be so impressive and utterly original that some American producers would later compile the first two parts into “Shogun Assassin,” which subsequently influenced many filmmakers including Quentin Tarantino (“Kill Bill”). Although I could recommend this version too, it’s only fair that I first endorse the original due to the significant differences of the American remix (i.e. voice over, soundtrack, dubbing, etc).

“Baby Cart at the River Styx” is the second part in a series of six, which is in fact an incomplete series (to the chagrin of this author), and the best, though all are excellent. Some have even sub-categorized it in the horror genre, because it’s that gory, but I don’t agree. It’s always stylized and absurd enough to not disgust. Seriously, it’s never been more fun chopping off a person’s extremities. One poor fellow has everything, and I mean everything, sliced off. Good stuff.

The glorious opening scene wastes no frame in setting the bloody tone, and it’s balls-to-the-wall until the fantastic finale. The story follows Ogami Itto, the former executioner to the Shogun, who wanders the countryside with his young son, Daigoro, as an assassin for hire. Alright, I could get into plot, which is solid, but who cares. What is so cool about this movie is that, despite the over-the-top gore and nudity, it manages to avoid being outright exploitive and maintain its artistic veracity. The scene in which Itto’s sworn enemy, Sayaka, breast-feeds Daigoro, for instance, is amazingly beautiful and poignant (yes, that’s right). You’d never see a scene like that in American films without it being painfully awkward, wrong-headed, or moralized. It just wouldn’t fly. But here, director Misumi Kenji has found ways to weave in humanistic touches with the grand-guignol sensationalism. It’s well paced and exceptionally choreographed. This director is a master, period. Also, Ogami’s relationship with his son Daigoro is devoid of sentimentality yet their bond is palpable. The picture of Ogami pushing his (adorable) son in a rickety baby cart (basically a Swiss army knife on wheels) is one of the most iconic images in the pantheon of chambara cinema.

Something worth mentioning is that 70’s cinema in Japan really was a free-for-all decade, like America, that produced inimitable samurai films (that were almost reactionary to the traditional samurai films made by the greats like Kurosawa, Okamoto, and Inagaki) such as ”Lone Wolf and Cub” brethren “Lady Snowblood,” “Shogun’s Samurai: The Yagyu Conspiracy,” and of course the original “Zatoichi” films. Oh, and rumor has it that Darren Aronofsky (“Pi,” “The Fountain”) is planning a remake of “Lone Wolf and Cub,” which makes me nauseous, but it’s understandable since these films really are touchstones of the genre.

Again, this film is a blast! It’s so visually stunning and mind-blowingly inventive, it stands out as a bold example of Japanese audacity. The sequence (among countless) on the rural trail in which Ogami must dispense of countless female ninja is out of this world, and downright surreal. This movie rocks!

Okay, I could keep going and drop more superlatives but I’ll stop here and let you discover it for yourself. This samurai film is unlike anything you’ve ever seen. Check it out.