Whether or not Jews and/or anti-Semites feel that "Jews are not white," the federal government classifies the vast majority of Jewish-Americans as white, and that's what counts in the DEI statistics, so that's what matters in modern America.
— Steve Sailer (@Steve_Sailer) November 16, 2023
Lots of people have lots of theories and feelings about whether Jews are white or not. But, in terms of jobs and affirmative action, what matters most is the boring logic of the beancounting paperwork imposed by the federal bureaucracy on virtually all American institutions:
Black HR Lady: “OK, for the purposes of our corporate DEI initiatives, what race box should I check on your job application?”
Job applicant: “I’m Jewish.”
Black HR Lady: “OK, so I’ll check white.”
Job Applicant: “No, I’m not white, I’m Jewish.”
B.HR.L: “I don’t see a Jewish box, so I’m checking white.”
J.A.: “I’ve never felt white. My family always told me we aren’t really white.”
B.HR.L: “Well, there’s no Jewish box. So I’ll check white.”
J.A.: “No, I’m not white.”
B.HR.L: “Unh-huh.”
J.A.: “Really, I’m not.”
B.HR.L: “Well, to be frank, you look pretty white to me.”
J.A.: “I have kind of curly hair!”
B.HR.L: “Unh-huh … OK, where were your folks from?”
J.A.: “My paternal great-grandparents were from Lithuania and my maternal grandmother was from Romania.”
B.HR.L: “Unh-huh … I’m not sure exactly where Lithuania and Romania are, but they sound European to me, so, I’m checking the white box.”
J.A. “But Jews originally came to Europe from the Middle East.”
B.HR.L: “It says here that according to the Office of Management and Budget, the definition of ‘white’ is ‘A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa.’ So I’m clicking on the white box.”
J.A.: [Desperately] “My parents told me I had an ancestor born in the Caribbean.”
B.HR.L: [Brightening] “Really? My grandmother was from Barbados. What was your people’s name?”
J.A. “Judah P. Benjamin.”
B.HR.L: [Darkening] “Never heard of him.” [Decisively checks “white.”]
J.A.: “Uh–”
B.HR.L: [Blandly upbeat, smiling professionally] “Thanks for the job application. Don’t call us, we’ll call you.”
I was shocked when Mike Wallace was interviewing Morgan Freeman on Sixty Minutes, and Freeman said that he wasn’t interested in black history “month” and asked Wallace whether he was interested in a white history month (just 12 seconds in):
Wallace demurred and said “Well, I’m Jewish.”
I was more innocent then – I was shocked. It’s like all of the Jewish people I knew (and I know many) have been hiding out.
Hahaaa! I haven’t seen much of that screenwriting here from you before. Nice job with the depiction of a typical HR bureaucrat. “Expect to get to get a call from the producer. Seriously.”
https://www.unz.com/isteve/is-it-safer-to-visit-a-coffee-shop-or-a-gym/#comment-3888811 (#122, etc.)Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
Benjamin was Sephardic and iirc his kids were raised as Christians so it’s pretty unlikely that the guy in your little playlet was actually descended from Benjamin.
That is the fly in the ointment of the Jewish slave trader narrative. Even if Jews ran the slave trade (they didn’t) today’s Jews are as responsible for what they did as white Americans are responsible for Pizzaro.
Soooo... I'm not casting any stones.
If I'm not responsible for the transactions of some distant relative who was born over 200 years ago, neither are any Jews.
But it would be nice to see a little honesty regarding the reality of antebellum Southern society, which may well have featured the most liberated, equal under the law, unrestricted, respected (and respectable) and un-oppressed Jewish community on earth at the time. Somehow that reality doesn't feature much in movies about the era, although a Jewish actor quite fittingly played Ashley in Gone With the Wind.Replies: @Harry Baldwin, @Jack D
I am not sure when the term White became synonomous European.
"The Naturalization Act of 1790 of the United State limited naturalization to "free White person(s) ... of good character",". It covered Jews and people of the Eastern Mediterranean except by some quirk of legal reasoning,, Muslims.
So perhaps the Jewish intellectuals clubbing Whites using a contrived social theory are partly right in saying Whiteness is a social construct. The construct included Jews because Jews were seen as part of the European fabric.
It didn't hurt that Jews looked like John Podhoretz. It's a shame to see European Jews saying they're not White. They're literally denying their maternal bloodline.
https://i.ibb.co/GTC2LgC/jeantel2.png
https://i.ibb.co/Gsj0pC3/jeantel3.png
https://i.ibb.co/vjDDbfY/jeantel4.png
https://i.ibb.co/XXfWSfR/jeantel5r.pngReplies: @anonymouseperson
Elon Musk has pointed out Jewish organizations like ADL are anti-white. The ADL represents the collective will of Jewish people to dominate over other people.
https://time.com/6336614/tesla-and-x-face-advertiser-and-investor-fallout-over-elon-musks-controversial-post/
Steve, if you and other conservative social media stars don’t support Elon Musk, then he is going to get cancelled and no one will dare to challenge Jewish power again. They will feel enboldened to end democracy through vote rigging. We must support Elon to save democracy in America.
Black HR Lady: You gon’ have to wait until my lotion dries ’til I can put you down as anything, hun.
I don’t follow these people, in any sense of the word “follow”. So, I ask, is this John Podhorhetz’s normal take on things, that Jews are not White?
Otherwise, he could be a little extra upset right now that…
A) Yeah, you can’t go doing that Woke stuff on OUR people! That’s not how it’s supposed to work!
B) Why aren’t there more White gentiles in this crowd?! It seems like we used to have more on our side, say, I don’t know, 50 years back, before, what was it … our immigration program…. uh, oh…
Yeah it’s a weird thing. My best guess is that Jews who think of themselves as not White mean not WASP. On “The Sopranos” Tony once claimed not to be not White too.
My grandmother spoke of an incident when the rich white ladies came from the settlement house to see how the rabble lived, and were surprised that they were so civilized that they had real curtains in their windows. Remembering her Caesar, she quipped that while their ancestors had been painting themselves blue and living in caves, ours were busy conquering the world.
In 1923-24, back in the good old days of eugenics, Congress passed laws excluding the importation of members of inferior races (primarily Asians) which included strict quotas on the number of southern European subhumans. Gotta preserve the purity of the good old white race after all - fooled them, though, didn't we. Along with the Irish, we turned their brave republic into the sewer of corruption and self-interest that passes for normal now.
I seem to recall would do these little playlets more often. (“Unreal Estate”? Was that one?) This one was delightful, Steve. You should do more.
Steve, do you compare Podhoretz to Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson? Or is it just White people you call “lower class” when they advocate for their people?
You’ve said you find it declasse’ for Whites (but only Whites) to do that. So why do Jewish Billionaires get a pass, even though they’re far more aggressive in pushing the interests of their people?
Whites are supposed to be above it all because apparently they have enough to never worry about it.
The heathen not living up to Enlightenment ideals, while not great, is understandable in Steve's mind. They are heathen, after all. But whites misbehaving by, say, wanting to think of themselves as a group, is unforgivable.
Steve would have made a great pastor or small college professor in 19th century New England. He's definitely not made for the 21st century.
The Ideological Age is ending. The Demographic Age has begun. Steve laments that.Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality
Things are getting dicey for the likes of Podhoretz. I’m sure everyone has seen the recent Tweet:
To which Elon replied:
Elon has been saying some things recently that indicate he understands our problems. He describes wokeness as a sort of suicidal mind-virus and said George Soros hates humanity and is using his wealth to destroy society. He has expressed agreement with Tweets pointing out the outsized percentage of violent crimes committed by blacks.
To crush him they’ll try with all their might.
Ye shall know the truth;
It will free you, forsooth,
In the words of the Great Bethlehemite.Replies: @Houston 1992, @ChrisZ
Somehow though, it's "antisemitic" for Whites to say there are anti-White Jews. Why is that?
Is the argument that anti-White Jews don't exist? They obviously do. Or is the argument that it is simply antisemitic to criticize Jews?
It's seems obvious that they're using a double standard, and getting away with it. People are starting to notice.Replies: @Hypnotoad666
Why aren’t there more White gentiles in this crowd?!
Is there evidence that there weren’t plenty of white gentiles in the crowd? It’s not like everyone would be wearing a yarmulke and a prayer shawl. There are plenty of Jews you wouldn’t recognize as Jewish and vice versa. By his appearance, I assumed that Arthur Engoron, the crazy Trump-hating judge in the NY case, is Jewish but he’s not.
They have called Elon Musk “antisemite”;
To crush him they’ll try with all their might.
Ye shall know the truth;
It will free you, forsooth,
In the words of the Great Bethlehemite.
The “West “ would soon collapse . Elon could return as Emperor Elon then and start the rebuild.Replies: @Jack D
That is the fly in the ointment of the Jewish slave trader narrative. Even if Jews ran the slave trade (they didn't) today's Jews are as responsible for what they did as white Americans are responsible for Pizzaro.Replies: @Dmon, @James J. O'Meara, @Pop Warner, @Corpse Tooth, @Bill P, @mc23, @Buzz Mohawk, @Pastit, @Stan Adams, @Wj
The US doesn’t send aircraft carrier groups to protect Spain.
https://www.city-journal.org/article/jefferson-versus-the-muslim-piratesReplies: @Dmon
"We often give the enemy the means of our own destruction" -- AesopReplies: @Art Deco
John Podhoretz has blue eyes.
Blue eyes = white in my book.
https://lemur.duke.edu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/flav-3.jpgReplies: @Robertson
Mike Wallace (real name Myron Leon Wallik) made that clear what, 30 years ago when he made sure to let Morgan Freeman know he was jewish and not white, and therefor not to be held accountable for slavery, white racism, blah blah blah, in the US:
Wallace, Podhoretz, and Jews in general need to pick a fucking side and stick with it. Either quit hiding amongst the whites to obscure your over-representation in everything or stop trying to smother whites due to their "privilege."
Here's a little bit of info for the Jews to consider and no doubt ignore: to non-whites, Jews are seen as even more white than whitey, as everything white cranked up to another level. Whitey may not love you the way you want him to, but he'll love you more than the darker peoples of the Earth ever will.Replies: @Art Deco
LOL!
Again: Judah Benjamin.
I always found it amusing that film director Norman Jewison, director of the film version of Fiddler on the Roof, isn’t Jewish, rather a Canuck of Anglo anscestry.
The famous Jowett was a 19th century Oxford don who became Master of Balliol. A wag wrote:
First come I; my name is Jowett. There's no knowledge, but I know it. I am the Master of this college. What I don't know isn't knowledge.Replies: @Reg Cæsar
They get to their last meeting, Mayor Daley (Sr.), and his secretary says, "Sorry, the Mayor's left town. Gone fishing in Florida." Nice trusting Jewison says, "Well, I guess that's it. Let's go back to L.A." But the producer says, "No, something's wrong here. Let's stay one more day."
So they do, and the next morning the newspaper headlines are blaring about a huge scandal, half the City Council arrested, Mayor Daley mysteriously nowhere to be found. And Jewison says to the producer, "You SOB, you set this up so I'd understand Chicago better!"
LOL! Yes, everywhere Jews attacking Musk as antisemitic.
Comedy gold with that line!!
Now more historically accurate.
Agreed, Harry, and I wondered that too. No, of course you can’t tell easily in some crowd photos.
I was just going along with what Mr. P. wrote. I mean, why else put that correction of his up, if he didn’t think the crowd had lots of Jews in it? One would think so too, of course.
As I’ve been pointing out here for some time now, Jews have been increasingly pushing the narrative that they are not white for years. Because of course they are. And it hasn’t just been hipster Jews like Jussie Smollet’s dad, who would “Kill anyone who called him white.”
Just a couple old examples:
Evan Goldstein
“I completely agree that American Jews must recognize whiteness as an identity that has a tense relationship with Jewishness. In other words, we must reclaim our Jewishness in a way that disrupts our identification with “whiteness” in general…. The Jews are white, the Jews are not white; this is the aporetic, exilic “between” that might serve as the inaugural site of a Jewishness beyond whiteness.”
https://newvoices.org/2015/01/27/the-jews-are-not-white/
***
“This is not merely a semantic issue,” Micha Danzig wrote in a column in the Forward. “Jews are not ‘white.’ We are a tribal people from the Levant. Many of our people were forcibly exiled out of and into other nations, including in Europe, where we were taken in chains and often subjected to brutal and oppressive institutional racism based on our ethnicity, tribal affiliation, culture and faith.”
The Jews certainly weren't 'taken to Europe in chains.' Judaism was a faith that already existed in multiple locations in the Hellenic world, then spread across the Roman Empire, primarily by conversion. One might as well insist all Mormons came from upstate New York.
Steve,
There is an article in The American Conservative that is all teed up for you and your foursome of old white guys.
Male Malaise article for readers at Unz
If Jews are not white, then why are they lumped in with whites when it comes to affirmative action and quotas. If Jews were their own thing, as Podhoretz claims, then shouldn’t Jews be counted separated and be limited to college admissions, government contracts, government jobs, voting districts based upon their percentage of the population?
What Podhoretz wants is for Jews to be counted as white when it benefits Jews but not counted as white when it disadvantages Jews.
I’m guessing Norman Jewison had a Jewish direct male line ancestor around 1300 AD who converted to Christianity, hence the surname.
So (possibly) the Italian "giupesce" became the jewfish, etc. Often later on there were folk etymologies attached where some connection was made between Jews and the jewfish even though the origin was purely phonetic.
As has been noted, Anglo-Norman names are a good proxy for the richer, smarter, upper class sort of Englishmen. Anglo-Normans play in the same league as Jews when it comes to smarts and wealth but they get lumped in with the British in general so they are not as easily recognized as a separate highly accomplished group.Replies: @Twinkie
https://newvoices.org/2015/01/27/the-jews-are-not-white/
***
“This is not merely a semantic issue,” Micha Danzig wrote in a column in the Forward. “Jews are not ‘white.’ We are a tribal people from the Levant. Many of our people were forcibly exiled out of and into other nations, including in Europe, where we were taken in chains and often subjected to brutal and oppressive institutional racism based on our ethnicity, tribal affiliation, culture and faith.”Replies: @Colin Wright, @anon, @Inquiring Mind
That’s such a distortion it’s almost funny. Most modern Europeans could make such claims with even greater validity.
The Jews certainly weren’t ‘taken to Europe in chains.’ Judaism was a faith that already existed in multiple locations in the Hellenic world, then spread across the Roman Empire, primarily by conversion. One might as well insist all Mormons came from upstate New York.
To crush him they’ll try with all their might.
Ye shall know the truth;
It will free you, forsooth,
In the words of the Great Bethlehemite.Replies: @Houston 1992, @ChrisZ
Musk could defect to China , and a million brilliant White engineers would follow
The “West “ would soon collapse . Elon could return as Emperor Elon then and start the rebuild.
I don't think a million white engineers would follow Musk to China. I don't think Musk would go in the 1st place. Really rich guys with gadfly tendencies tend to disappear in China.
Musk is going to have to stay here and deal with the consequences of his big mouth. He has already lost a huge amount of $ on X (Twitter) and now he is going to lose even more.Replies: @Buzz Mohawk, @Thea
That is the fly in the ointment of the Jewish slave trader narrative. Even if Jews ran the slave trade (they didn't) today's Jews are as responsible for what they did as white Americans are responsible for Pizzaro.Replies: @Dmon, @James J. O'Meara, @Pop Warner, @Corpse Tooth, @Bill P, @mc23, @Buzz Mohawk, @Pastit, @Stan Adams, @Wj
Prior to WWII, they used to brag about it in their J for J books. Then they stopped mentioning it, and denounced anyone who did as an “anti-Semite.” So, I think they kinda own it.
He’s 62, and not aging well. The smart money says Commentary will cease publication when he’s eligible for Medicare, its endowment converted to his retirement account.
It seems perfectly fine for Jews to say there are antisemitic White people… they obviously exist.
Somehow though, it’s “antisemitic” for Whites to say there are anti-White Jews. Why is that?
Is the argument that anti-White Jews don’t exist? They obviously do. Or is the argument that it is simply antisemitic to criticize Jews?
It’s seems obvious that they’re using a double standard, and getting away with it. People are starting to notice.
It's also sort of odd to begin with that it's considered irrationally hateful merely to be "anti" something. Are Jews just so self-evidently wonderful that no single person could fail to be unreservedly in their favor? Can you at least be Jew-neutral, if you feel you don't have enough facts to form an opinion?Replies: @Jack D
To crush him they’ll try with all their might.
Ye shall know the truth;
It will free you, forsooth,
In the words of the Great Bethlehemite.Replies: @Houston 1992, @ChrisZ
You need to do a book of these, Des.
Aircraft carriers won’t do Israel much good. While we’re at it, brigands aren’t infiltrating Spain to murder people at music festivals.
That happens in France.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/November_2015_Paris_attacks#Bataclan_theatre_massacre
They blow up trains in Spain.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_Madrid_train_bombings
In neither case did the governments respond by slaughtering civilians and small children.
The Guardian has been almost as pro-Israel as the Labour and Tory parties, but their readers aren't having it.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/nov/17/gaza-invasion-israel-west-crisis
Does Zionism equal Jewish supremacy? When will American Jews condemn Frankfurt/New School cultural Marxism, an ideology that directly targets American and European whites from a Christian background?Replies: @Art Deco
Jews have had over 50 percent intermarriage rates for decades, likely overwhelmingly to non-Jewish whites and to Asians. So if Jews aren’t white, are half-Jews or quarter-Jews not white? It becomes ridiculous.
That is the fly in the ointment of the Jewish slave trader narrative. Even if Jews ran the slave trade (they didn't) today's Jews are as responsible for what they did as white Americans are responsible for Pizzaro.Replies: @Dmon, @James J. O'Meara, @Pop Warner, @Corpse Tooth, @Bill P, @mc23, @Buzz Mohawk, @Pastit, @Stan Adams, @Wj
Jews actually did run the slave trade in Eastern Europe where the slaves where Slavs, but Americans are obsessed with blacks so they only focus on them.
And then they sit down to their Seder supper, and sing funny songs celebrating the mass killing of African babies, and talk about the "bitterness" of slavery in Egypt, when they were only all too happy to start the practice themselves, fifteen minutes later. Jewish values, don't ya know.
There are two moralities:
1. Slavery Is Categorically Bad, and
2. It Is Bad To Be A Slave, But If You're Lucky Enough To Own Slaves, Then Cool.
ALL blacks and Jews subscribe to (2). Blacks whinge and whine about de turrrrble slabery, but if they had the opportunity to own Whites as slaves (and they have, and often), they'd all do it in a heartbeat. And not just for revenge, but for the sheer pleasure of it. As to Jews, the question is not even hypothetical: they own plenty of White slaves already, and have no intention of changing course.Replies: @Jack D
Greenblatt of the ADL – “we need to put all of our brains into this tiktok problem, this generational problem – Generation Z. The issue of American support for Israel is not split left/right – it’s split young/old“.
https://newvoices.org/2015/01/27/the-jews-are-not-white/
***
“This is not merely a semantic issue,” Micha Danzig wrote in a column in the Forward. “Jews are not ‘white.’ We are a tribal people from the Levant. Many of our people were forcibly exiled out of and into other nations, including in Europe, where we were taken in chains and often subjected to brutal and oppressive institutional racism based on our ethnicity, tribal affiliation, culture and faith.”Replies: @Colin Wright, @anon, @Inquiring Mind
Good old Shlomo Micha Yid is loaded with BS.
https://youtu.be/Npex5-nhD9I?si=xOU91TPaMv0WaV8iReplies: @HammerJack, @common noticer, @Currahee, @Pastit
Jews are white when it suits their purposes, and only then. “Shape shifting.”
Steve could write the first HBD sitcom: “HR Black Lady.” I am picturing Queen Latifa for the titular role, with a canned 70’s style laugh track whooping uproariously when she hits punch lines like, “Y’all looks white to me.”
Spain also doesn’t occupy someone else’s land, whom they corral into concentration camps and then torture and slaughter by the tens of thousands. But when the Chosen People do it, you celebrate it.
Now make yourself useful for once, and tell us why Israel needs air-to-air refueling capabilities for their long-range fighter-bombers. Provided by the USA of course.
==
If the Arabs on the West Bank and Gaza wanted an end to the Jewish presence there and an Arab state in those two territories, they'd have taken that deal when it was offered. They spurned it, twice. Because 'the occupation' is not their complaint. Their complaint is that there's a thriving Jewish state in the eastern Mediterranean.
==
There are no concentration camps, there is no torture, and the only people 'slaughtered' are combatants and civilians in the line of fire during battles the Arab bosses have elected to fight.
==
You and your unfortunate family would benefit from living in this world and not in the world of your poisonous imagination.Replies: @bjondo, @HammerJack
Irish Catholics are not white
Good punchline, Steve.
Judah P. Benjamin$ would be a good name for a Jewish rapper
While I understand why you used Fiddler on the Roof as your example, I would like to note that Jewison also directed In the Heat of the Night as well as And Justice For All… Later in his career he directed the propaganda piece The Hurricane.
“HR Black Lady” would be a great character because, being black, she could speak all sorts of non-pc truths that white people have to repress. The Michael Scott character on “The Office” could get away with the same thing because he was presented as clueless.
There is a British building supplies firm called Jewson. Yer internet reports: “English (Norfolk): patronymic from any of the Middle English personal names Jew(e), Julle, or Jouet, all pet forms of Julian (mainly a female name) + -son; see Jew, Jowett .”
The famous Jowett was a 19th century Oxford don who became Master of Balliol. A wag wrote:
First come I; my name is Jowett. There’s no knowledge, but I know it. I am the Master of this college. What I don’t know isn’t knowledge.
The weekend at the college
Didn’t turn out like you planned
The things that pass for knowledge
I can’t understand
It isn’t up to Poddy to make the classification – it is something imposed from above, whether Poddy likes it or not.
Suffice to say, the only view that the colored people’s of the world have of Jews is that they are a breed of ‘super whites’, that is white people gifted with magical powers conferring on them massive wealth, massive political power and massive privilege. Any attempt by Jews to weasel out of this classification – by, perhaps, appealing to an anti European man brotherhood of the oppressed – will, surely, be met with ridicule, derision and contempt.
As the saying goes, ‘racism is all about power’.
Exactly. As a foil, she would need to have a white gay assistant who is all PC and rule-following, and is always concerned that HR Black Lady is going to get them all fired and sued. I’d also throw in a white-guy character based on Steve, who is as a semi-autistic HBD nerd. He’d say things like, “Actually, Ms. HR Black Lady, there are several different kinds of Jews, you’ve got your Ashkenazis, your Sephardim, . . . .”
HR Black Lady: “Ashkewhatzis? I just aksed you if the dude was white, I don’t wanna know none of your nerd stuff about no 31 flavors of Joos, they all be just a bunch of white guys with little hats as far as I care.” [Cue: Laugh Track].
Oh, wait, a TV sitcom? Screw that.
Yes, and as per a couple of commenters already, that "Judah P. Benjamin" line was great.
cf “The Drew Carey Show” where Drew was the assistant Director of Personnel.
“brigands aren’t infiltrating Spain to murder people at music festivals”
That happens in France.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/November_2015_Paris_attacks#Bataclan_theatre_massacre
They blow up trains in Spain.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_Madrid_train_bombings
In neither case did the governments respond by slaughtering civilians and small children.
The Guardian has been almost as pro-Israel as the Labour and Tory parties, but their readers aren’t having it.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/nov/17/gaza-invasion-israel-west-crisis
I read some articles, but not wanting to bother anyone- non-white Jews (who look white) fall into two categories:
a) Israeli nationalists who pick middle Eastern looking Jews so as to prove that Jews are indigenous middle Easterners who came back home
b) in the US- not elsewhere- race grifters & some alienated people who emotionally “don’t belong” to the Western world. In their case, it is more about identity & attitude that West is a hostile and alien place (Susan “white race is the cancer” Sontag). I can understand these psychos, but that leaves them at…what? They don’t try to establish something “non white” (whatever it means) as their cultural identity. They don’t try to racheldolezhalize phenotypically.
Never mind, it’s basically a mental condition …
-For Jews, group identity is based in terms of particular political/religious tribes. Their identity is special clothing, education system, songs, national festival, religion, politics, rules of the romantic life and magical thinking in cult groups. If you want to know the identity there, you look more at their clothes and behavior, different festivals and the different kind of veneration. For example, religious nationalists are different races, but you can always them because they have different clothing. The women are not allowed to wear trousers. Women and men are separated to different areas. They have special festivals. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CaZBLruSVXo Secular Jewish culture is based in worship of the state, army and patriotism. They also have behaviors from the kibbutz culture. But the racial groups are diverging and they absorb different immigrants' groups from the second and third world. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7_O4kPux8EThere are also Haredim inbreeding cults which each small group has different clothes and hats to signify between each other their group and their status. They don't believe in rational worldview, but in supernatural categories, magical thinking, effects of inbreeding. If you asked those people if they are white or brown? It's like discussing with religious 18th century people,.They have such strange categories and views, they will be sometimes only controllable for a modern state because they follow an internal principle of non-violence beyond spitting. For example, they call the Israeli police Nazis and non-Jews. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikSZ-5GKlZsReplies: @Bardon Kaldian
A lot of White people reject their Whiteness and likely wish they had an excuse like Podhoretz’s. Wanting to identify as White is lower status than being a MAGA supporter or Brexiteer. Jews have have done everything in their power (which is substantial) to make things this way. The irony is delicious.
It’s an interesting thought. Tablet seems to be stepping into their role for right-leaning Jews.
As you’ve pointed out many times, the American racial spoils system depends almost entirely on white (or White) Americans being honest about their heritage, and not just checking the Hispanic, Native American, Two or more races, or any other box whenever they feel like. Elizabeth Warren gets away with it to this day, and all of those crazy professor ladies would have too if they just hadn’t been insane parodies of whatever ethnicity they were faking. Keep your head down and accept the benefits.
I think Jewish Americans should classify themselves however they want at any given time, as should all other whites, and bring the whole thing down. TPTB won’t start initiating genetic tests to verify self ID, because their official position is that “race is not biological.” haha.
Jews are turning from Fight To Be White to Flight From White now that whites are set to hit minority status in about 1.5 generations and the bills of attainder start passing. This is also why liberal whites are scrambling for any scrap of Native genetics they can find, or they just make it up.
Levantine Arabs are doing the same thing:
Fight To Be White
Flight From White.
Not knowing who this Benjamin was, I searched for him & and I found a double of Croatian dramatist Dimitri Demetar from the 1st half of the 19th C…
Judah Benjamin


Dimitrija Demeter
iSteve, you may know about intersectional identity, but you seem to know nothing about identity superposition.
It’s Schroedinger’s Semite: at once white and not white. You don’t know which until the Semite is presented with an opportunity to gain by one identity or the other.
https://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1700248593327121.jpg
Are Mexicans Spaniards, Indians, or mestizos?
It depends on which is more advantageous for the individual at the moment.
There is nothing about this specific to these two groups. The answer is versatile; it can conceivably be used by any other with two or more potential identities. Are mulattoes/Coloured white or black?
Are Britons European, or sui generis?
Are Japanese Asians, or sui generis?
Are Palestinians Arabs, or indigenous?Fun fact: the composer of "Hava Nagila" was born in Jerusalem in the 19th century. It was based on a folk tune genre called a niggun.
When will that term be changed?Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
Looking at John Podheretz, I’m guessing the average non Muslim, person of color looking for a leg up via a Diversity Inclusion and Equity program would say John is White about 99% of the time. Maybe John’s pissed because he thought the tribe controlled the DIE definitions but the people of color are saying otherwise.
Yes, and like “Hispanic” they are protected class, as Jews, and like Arabs have that status over the routinely discriminated against non-semitic white; no “nonwhite” definition necessary. Though of course the Middle Easterners fleeing their whiteness demonstrates there are levels.
https://www.jewishfederations.org/fedworld/us-court-rules-jews-are-protected-race-under-civil-rights-act-of-1964-278536
https://forward.com/news/breaking-news/436256/trump-to-sign-order-recognizing-jews-as-a-nationality-protected-class/
Jews play the race/religion, white/not-white game, shifting as necessary, almost always contrary to actually elucidating whatever issue is at hand, and always in their interest.
When counting/quotas are brought up for Jews are a religion–so Jews can’t be counted, can’t have a quota.
When Jews feel like “affirmative action”ing–i.e. quotaing–in blacks and browns, or slapping a quota on Asians–Jews are just “white”, so that their massive over-representation is hidden, and that the white gentiles–descendants of the people who founded and settled the nation–are the most under-represented group, even more wildly underrepresented compared to available talent, is hidden.
When someone is beating on on whitey, then Jews are not white, but an “oppressed” minority.
We should just call Jews “the Chosen People”–the people who can do no wrong and are always entitled–and be done with it.
~~~
Podhoretz is–mildly–entertaining. He’s too dumb and too passionate to be smooth and subtle and hide his atavistic impulses.
Podhoretz is a walking talking example of why it was such a disaster to allow large number of Jews to come to the United States. Huge numbers of highly capable, verbally facile people incapable of just throwing in and being loyal to regular old white bread Americans.
a) (ostensible) - "that's what the Nazis did, how could you be so hateful, it'll be camps and trains next"
b) (actual) - "we'll be seen as the wealthiest and most privileged group"Replies: @Reg Cæsar
John is not nearly as smart as his father Norman. The apple fell quite far from the tree in his case.
I think George Soros is an instance of another type of identity superposition, but it’s too complex for me to model. Maybe Physicist Dave can help.

Jews are only white when it suits them to be white.
Having said that, it’s a major conceit of the jews to think of themselves as not white. They think that just by saying that they will escape the wrath they are bringing down on whites. It is a delusion.
That is the fly in the ointment of the Jewish slave trader narrative. Even if Jews ran the slave trade (they didn't) today's Jews are as responsible for what they did as white Americans are responsible for Pizzaro.Replies: @Dmon, @James J. O'Meara, @Pop Warner, @Corpse Tooth, @Bill P, @mc23, @Buzz Mohawk, @Pastit, @Stan Adams, @Wj
The Atlantic Slave Trade began in the 1400s with the Portuguese who had contact with the Arab networks in West Africa. European Jews didn’t run the trade itself because that would require vigorous activity, the hard work of killing, and the danger of navigating the Atlantic. But they financed and profited from it.
Should modern day Poles and Lithuanians feel responsible for what the Portuguese did in Africa? If not, what blame should I as an Ashkenazi Jew accept for the actions of the Sephardic Jews who are as remote from me as Portuguese are from Poles?
But in anti-Semitic discourse, it's always "the Jews" who ran the slave trade.
I hope Jews get themselves reclassified as non-White and eligible for Affirmative Action goodies.
Your America 2023 scene there would go well bookended with the “Lass es, Larry!” outro (“Frolic,” a 1974 licensing library ditty by Luciano Michelini)— or perhaps a dubstep cover of Minor Threat’s “Guilty of Being White”
What year did Afr0-Euro-Asian mongrels (Jews) suddenly become ‘white’?
“infiltrating”
Does Zionism equal Jewish supremacy? When will American Jews condemn Frankfurt/New School cultural Marxism, an ideology that directly targets American and European whites from a Christian background?
In May 2020, Steve and I had dueling dialogue dumps featuring the same Covid caution couple:
https://www.unz.com/isteve/is-it-safer-to-visit-a-coffee-shop-or-a-gym/#comment-3888811 (#122, etc.)
Covide-19that shit - I noticed none from me. That post was from May 8th '20, with comments going on through May 12th.I see there was some good common sense coming in from some of the crowd already. Travis had one about obesity that about nailed it. However, my favorite was this one from "Paul":Kind of prescient too...Rollerball (1975), starring one of my favorite Jews, the awesome James Caan.
https://youtu.be/Npex5-nhD9I?si=xOU91TPaMv0WaV8iReplies: @HammerJack, @common noticer, @Currahee, @Pastit
Myron Wallik – er, Mike Wallace – chose to hide his Jewishness to hide amongst the whites when it benefited him. Now, he chooses to deny his whiteness and accentuate his Jewishness… because it benefits him.
Wallace, Podhoretz, and Jews in general need to pick a fucking side and stick with it. Either quit hiding amongst the whites to obscure your over-representation in everything or stop trying to smother whites due to their “privilege.”
Here’s a little bit of info for the Jews to consider and no doubt ignore: to non-whites, Jews are seen as even more white than whitey, as everything white cranked up to another level. Whitey may not love you the way you want him to, but he’ll love you more than the darker peoples of the Earth ever will.
https://newvoices.org/2015/01/27/the-jews-are-not-white/
***
“This is not merely a semantic issue,” Micha Danzig wrote in a column in the Forward. “Jews are not ‘white.’ We are a tribal people from the Levant. Many of our people were forcibly exiled out of and into other nations, including in Europe, where we were taken in chains and often subjected to brutal and oppressive institutional racism based on our ethnicity, tribal affiliation, culture and faith.”Replies: @Colin Wright, @anon, @Inquiring Mind
What about the member populations of Southern California Dark Tinted Window Culture?
Actually Spain (unlike Israel) is a full NATO member so you couldn’t be more wrong.
Bottom line is this: Jews want group benefits, but not group responsibility. If you are going to qualify for special treatment exclusively on the basis of your membership in a group, then don't be surprised when people blame you for the stuff about your group that they don't like. It's the flip side of affirmative action. Same with blacks. Every one of them is a victim of slavery and deserves eternal reparations, but when it comes to violent crime, then it's only a small percentage who are to blame and it's racist to treat them all like potential criminals.
Israel may not be a de jure member of NATO, but it might as well be, at least as far as its own defense is concerned. But of course it is not at all on the hook if some country attacks an actual NATO member.
So Spain is obligated by treaty to come to the defense of the US. I don’t see any mutual defense treaty with Israel.
Bottom line is this: Jews want group benefits, but not group responsibility. If you are going to qualify for special treatment exclusively on the basis of your membership in a group, then don’t be surprised when people blame you for the stuff about your group that they don’t like. It’s the flip side of affirmative action. Same with blacks. Every one of them is a victim of slavery and deserves eternal reparations, but when it comes to violent crime, then it’s only a small percentage who are to blame and it’s racist to treat them all like potential criminals.
I assume the original tweeter meant “uninterested” or “disinclined” instead of “disinterested.” Who was it?
It’s a tad ironic that Jews are increasingly distancing themselves from “Whiteness” at the same time that their cultural pogrom against “Whiteness” is coming to full fruition. Probably not a coincidence me thinks.
I have an in-law who is an Ashkenazi Jew and she looks kinda white (except for the very curly hair) but definitely doesn’t act white. She’s a living, breathing stereotype of a female Jew- neurotic, uber liberal, domineering, ball busting and every single one of my wifes extremely WASPY family members is scared spitless of her. It’s kind of funny watching the dynamic of a Jew amongst WASPS play out at family gatherings. I’m not a wimpy, guilt ridden, ritually polite WASP so she doesn’t intimidate me in the least and doesn’t fuck with me as a result.
Exactly when did world conquering WASPS become so gutless and easily intimidated?
HR Black Lady: "Ashkewhatzis? I just aksed you if the dude was white, I don't wanna know none of your nerd stuff about no 31 flavors of Joos, they all be just a bunch of white guys with little hats as far as I care." [Cue: Laugh Track].Replies: @Achmed E. Newman, @Gunnar von Cowtown
Now, we’ve got a screenwriter (or two, or three), and a couple of budding casting directors. I know Steve Sailer’s always wanted to direct movies, ever since he realized he was never gonna be a black golf course architect. He can do that too. Now, I know just the man to be producer. Ron Unz, are you reading this thread? Got a couple dozen million for this project?
Oh, wait, a TV sitcom? Screw that.
Yes, and as per a couple of commenters already, that “Judah P. Benjamin” line was great.
Yes, this. On 4chan there are often screenshots collected of the very same Jewish people, either claiming they are not white because Jewish, or addressing ‘fellow white people’ when they want to give a pro-poc ‘anti-racism’ lecture … here’s one set for example, ‘white’ on top, ‘not white – Jewish’ on the bottom, the same people
That is the fly in the ointment of the Jewish slave trader narrative. Even if Jews ran the slave trade (they didn't) today's Jews are as responsible for what they did as white Americans are responsible for Pizzaro.Replies: @Dmon, @James J. O'Meara, @Pop Warner, @Corpse Tooth, @Bill P, @mc23, @Buzz Mohawk, @Pastit, @Stan Adams, @Wj
I once saw a photo of a slave brokerage in which the names of the owning partners were prominently displayed. One of the names was clearly Jewish (Levi or something like that). But the other one was my surname.
Soooo… I’m not casting any stones.
If I’m not responsible for the transactions of some distant relative who was born over 200 years ago, neither are any Jews.
But it would be nice to see a little honesty regarding the reality of antebellum Southern society, which may well have featured the most liberated, equal under the law, unrestricted, respected (and respectable) and un-oppressed Jewish community on earth at the time. Somehow that reality doesn’t feature much in movies about the era, although a Jewish actor quite fittingly played Ashley in Gone With the Wind.
And died in World War II, his plane probably shot down by the Luftwaffe .Replies: @Anonymous, @Steve Sailer
Who wants to read Jewish “Jews are not white” misery-lit, try this:
https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/why-is-whitewashing-only-ok-when-it-happens-to-jews/ (about the movie “Oppenheimer” & whitewashing Jews)
https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/2030-us-census-why-jews-deserve-their-own-box-under-middle-eastern/ (why MENA is OK)
https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/on-gentile-privilege-a-checklist/ (some navel gazing)
https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/can-we-talk-about-hollywoods-white-washing-of-jews-now/ (Mel Gibson the Terrible)
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/13/magazine/im-jewish-and-dont-identify-as-white-why-must-i-check-that-box.html (Steve generator)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/09/22/jews-in-america-struggled-for-generations-to-become-white-now-we-must-give-up-that-privilege-to-fight-racism/ (WaPo rage, rage against white privilege)
https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/if-jews-are-a-race-then-congratulations-youre-related-to-hamas/ (Jews are Arabs who are Africans)
And, this one on the nose is funny…
We should just call Jews "the Chosen People"--the people who can do no wrong and are always entitled--and be done with it.~~~Podhoretz is--mildly--entertaining. He's too dumb and too passionate to be smooth and subtle and hide his atavistic impulses. Podhoretz is a walking talking example of why it was such a disaster to allow large number of Jews to come to the United States. Huge numbers of highly capable, verbally facile people incapable of just throwing in and being loyal to regular old white bread Americans.Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @OldJewishGuy
I always assumed that the reason for not having “Jewish” on the race/ethnicity bit of census forms was
a) (ostensible) – “that’s what the Nazis did, how could you be so hateful, it’ll be camps and trains next”
b) (actual) – “we’ll be seen as the wealthiest and most privileged group”
Before that, there was just race, birthplace, and parents' birthplaces to go by. Jews would have been " Russian", "Polish", " Austrian", "Roumanian", or what have you. They could have used "Ashkenazi", " Sephardi", etc as an ethnic marker-- e.g., Catholic Bernard Nathanson and Episcopalian Lawrence Auster, yes, Jews Sammy Davis Jr and Robert Putnam and Jewesses Ivanka Trump and Sara Blakely, no.Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
My uncle served with the US Navy in Spain in the early ’60s, I assume based at Rota. That base was founded in 1953, almost 30 years before Spain joined NATO.
Jews have been considered White since the founding of the Republic and before. Not only did many of them own slaves, many served in the Confederacy. Every single one I knew back in Queens, NY were as Pale as Scotsmen. Podheretz is hoping his grandkids get spared in the future Black Run America, but he should look up what blacks did to Jews during the Harlem riots and the Crown Heights riots. No, they’re not Wasps, but they’re White.
Soooo... I'm not casting any stones.
If I'm not responsible for the transactions of some distant relative who was born over 200 years ago, neither are any Jews.
But it would be nice to see a little honesty regarding the reality of antebellum Southern society, which may well have featured the most liberated, equal under the law, unrestricted, respected (and respectable) and un-oppressed Jewish community on earth at the time. Somehow that reality doesn't feature much in movies about the era, although a Jewish actor quite fittingly played Ashley in Gone With the Wind.Replies: @Harry Baldwin, @Jack D
a Jewish actor quite fittingly played Ashley in Gone With the Wind.
And died in World War II, his plane probably shot down by the Luftwaffe .
In 1942, Churchill had flown across the Atlantic, returning from America, and British propaganda had mocked the Luftwaffe for failing to intercept him.
At the time this BOAC airliner was shot down, Churchill was in North Africa, and it was suspected he would try to fly home again under the noses of the Germans.
British intelligence also spread rumors that an important person was on this plane, and one of the passengers had a physical resemblance to Churchill. The Germans had spies in Lisbon so were aware of this.
Piss off Podhoretz, you Baby Boomer New York City Jew dope, you don’t even know how to spell the word repellent.
Perhaps Mr Podhoretz mispelled the word repellent in his vicious, rhetorical Twitter attack on Steve Sailer due to other reasons rather than poor spelling. Fatso Podhoretz couldn’t spell repellent correctly because he had cheeseburger grease from a delivery service which hindered his ability to type.
Tweet from 2017:
John Podhoretz is a lovely human who spreads joy wherever he goes. I had an extremely pleasant encounter with Mr. Podhoretz on Twitter in 2014. It made me bust out laughing.
Tweet from 2014:
The whole thread on Twitter:
John Podhoretz: Hey, it’s Bush’s fault NY Times…Amazing it took five years for it to become a crisis!
Charles Pewitt: George W Bush and the Neo-Con shyster rodents pushed mass immigration into the US. Bush is to blame, Poddy.
John Podhoretz: Please attach a cup to your chin to catch the drool as it drops.
Charles Pewitt: My people settled and cleared the way for your filth. Poddy, you are an unassimilated, arrogant shyster rodent.
John Podhoretz: That lobotomy isn’t working very well.
Charles Pewitt: It was a mistake to allow large numbers of non-European, non-Christians to come to US. Poddy, you are filth.
John Podhoretz: Your right. Better that the continent be left to in-bred defectives like you.
Charles Pewitt: Do you think mass immigration since the 1965 Immigration Act has been good for the USA?
John Podhoretz: If it dilutes your personal vote to the point where it doesn’t matter, given that your IQ is 12, yes.
Charles Pewitt: Jon Podhoretz is a Neo-Con shyster rodent who pushes mass immigration into the US.
Wrong card to the play, Podhoretz. It will gain you nothing but negative reactions. No one is stupid enough to fall for it.
Blue eyes = white in my book.Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Graham, @Jay Fink, @anon
JPod is pale as a ghost.
https://youtu.be/Npex5-nhD9I?si=xOU91TPaMv0WaV8iReplies: @HammerJack, @common noticer, @Currahee, @Pastit
“…and therefor not to be held accountable for slavery, white racism, blah blah blah, in the US:”
LOL!
Again: Judah Benjamin.
I’ve posted a usable answer to these common questions before:
Are Jews a religious or an ethnic group?
Are Mexicans Spaniards, Indians, or mestizos?
It depends on which is more advantageous for the individual at the moment.
There is nothing about this specific to these two groups. The answer is versatile; it can conceivably be used by any other with two or more potential identities.
Are mulattoes/Coloured white or black?
Are Britons European, or sui generis?
Are Japanese Asians, or sui generis?
Are Palestinians Arabs, or indigenous?
Fun fact: the composer of “Hava Nagila” was born in Jerusalem in the 19th century. It was based on a folk tune genre called a niggun.
When will that term be changed?
Here are the true, rather than 'usable', answers to the dumb questions you present:
Q.) Are Jews a religious or an ethnic group?
A.) Ethnic, breed, or racial group.
Q.) Are Mexicans Spaniards, Indians, or mestizos?
A.) Which Mexicans? “Mexican” is a geographical-origin category.
Are mulattoes/Coloured white or black? Black.
Are Britons European, or sui generis? European.
Are Japanese Asians, or sui generis? Asians.
Are Palestinians Arabs, or indigenous? Arabs.
The lede is buried here. This awful woman uses “white” as a pejorative which evidently is intended to detract from the merits of the message of the protest and Podhoretz’s reaction is to plead “my people aren’t white” in defense.
Par for the course.
In the Heat of the Night wasn’t propaganda?
The fallacy in all this is the pretense that Israel is criticised because people see the Jews as “white” rather than, you know, being settler-colonialists who are constantly at war with everyone around them and generally as evil as they can get away with.
But I have no doubt that many Jews in the West believe this. Many Jews think people find Israel’s actions and existence problematic because it’s Jews doing it. They really, genuinely do.
So there will be lots of this flailing about. The first to raise the issue was Bari Weiss, the turbo-Zionist who got a strangely unmolested and respectful opportunity to inveigh against “wokeness” despite everyone knowing why the Jewish Gen X lesbian was complaining and it wasn’t minority identity politics or even trans stuff that does get under the skin of many lesbian radfems over a certain age. It was because the logic of wokeness and cancel culture would make the BDM movement look like a guy holding a “John 3:16” sign by comparison. They don’t fully control social media (They certainly don’t since Der Muskening) and so having to actually justify Israel’s actions in the next war would pose a problem.
She resigned to say to other Zionists “What the hell do we do? We can only argue against wokeness”.
But also since BLM and 2020, blacks have become not window-dressing but very active and radical controllers of “ethnic issues” in America and Jews no longer have any moral authority over them. Particularly since blacks never saw Jews as oppressed “others” in America.
This last part concerned Jews and so the movement to say “Jews aren’t white” but if the intent is to protect Israel it’s totally ignorant and tone deaf. Israel is despised because of what it does and what it is not because Ashkenazim make a large amount of it’s population.
It is, however, an attempt to try to desperately gain some moral superiority in the DEI era and try to usurp and control these movements to stop them criticising Israel. (The real chosen land has been the US all along)
But as the actions of the neocons since March 2022 have shown and Israel since October 7th. Jews are really good at gaining power and influence but they aren’t infallible in wielding it. Just as the neocons put Israel in a worse position with the proxy war with Russia by making the US weaker and Russia stronger, so too has Netanyahu put Israel on a course with crisis and total condemnation. Both actions were desperate gambles to try and gain total power, total supremacy.
Overreach from arrogance is all one can say. Of course, that Jews aren’t white is what guys like Podhoretz genuinely always felt anyway.
(Art Deco with an impassioned defense of neoconservatism in 3, 2, 1...)
The IT crew of the Obama campaign apparently not meeting the definition of a “demonstration”. Or maybe she just didn’t see it. (Anyone have that picture?)
I have Quaker ancestors who went from England to Rhode Island, over time, via Ireland and Barbados. I don’t think any were born in those places, but one died in the latter.
Can I call myself a Bajan?
The more I hear “white”, the more I prefer “Caucasian”. (Which is more correct than you imagine.) And it already comes with a majuscule.
Hell, I’m 100% NW-of-Munich European. This African
chickmatriarch is whiter than me:https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/04/scoop-white-kids-work-obama/
https://motherjones.com/wp-content/uploads/images/obama_kids.jpg
I think this settles the matter:
If someone really wants the job why do they want to get into an argument with the idiot HR lady?
All my life people have spelled my name wrong, but I just let them get on with it.
I don’t care in the slightest what race they put on my paperwork. These days most people call me a gringo, but if they are very friendly they may call me gringito.
A lot of Jews are white, just like some Mexicans are white and some Mexicans are Protestants, and some Mexicans are white Protestants.
A lot of Jews believe that they may be descended from the people who were kicked out of Israel 2000 years ago, but probability doesn’t really support it.
It is a bit like saying that every time you breathe you breathe molecules of air that were part of Julius Caesar’s last breath. It might even be true, but so what?
It's worth remembering that the Romans did not expel the Jews from Palestine. It's a popular belief but it's just an urban myth.
What the Romans did do - for how long I don't know - was ban Jews from living permanently in Jerusalem.
https://lemur.duke.edu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/flav-3.jpgReplies: @Robertson
Anomalies just prove the rule don’t they?
JPod is pale as a ghost.
Jews are white… until they aren’t.
The question is not race or skin colour. Sure, as race, most Jews are “white”. But they count themselves as a “minority” and therefore “non-white”. Plus they publish a lot of “anti-white” stuff, to distract from “anti-Jewish” stuff (i.e. “those evil whites who control all media and banks”).
Verdict: white by skin colour, non-white by self-identification and tradition (let’s be serious, “White” really means European Christian. Or used to, until recently).
We should just call Jews "the Chosen People"--the people who can do no wrong and are always entitled--and be done with it.~~~Podhoretz is--mildly--entertaining. He's too dumb and too passionate to be smooth and subtle and hide his atavistic impulses. Podhoretz is a walking talking example of why it was such a disaster to allow large number of Jews to come to the United States. Huge numbers of highly capable, verbally facile people incapable of just throwing in and being loyal to regular old white bread Americans.Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @OldJewishGuy
When I was growing up, it would have been unimaginable to me or any of my friends, both Jewish and gentile, that ashkenazi Jews were anything other than white. If someone had claimed otherwise, the automatic reply — as spot on then as it is now — would have been “Hey, moron, look in the mirror.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GeixtYS-P3s
Wallace demurred and said "Well, I'm Jewish."
I was more innocent then - I was shocked. It's like all of the Jewish people I knew (and I know many) have been hiding out.Replies: @American Citizen, @Mr. Anon, @Prester John
It seems like the non-whites have finally decided to not include Jews as fellow victims of the world.
It is hard to play a victim role when you are on average college educated, have at least a six-figure job, and your skin is pale. Especially when you’re trying to explain away those inconvenient facts to people who only see skin color. To most POC, a Jew is a rich white guy/gal.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Barcelona_attacks
“On the afternoon of 17 August 2017, 22-year-old Younes Abouyaaqoub drove a van into pedestrians on La Rambla street in Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain killing 13 people and injuring at least 130 others, one of whom died 10 days later on 27 August. Abouyaaqoub fled the attack on foot, then killed another person in order to steal the victim’s car to make his escape.[2][3][4]
Nine hours after the Barcelona attack, five men thought to be members of the same terrorist cell drove into pedestrians in nearby Cambrils, killing one woman and injuring six others. All five of those attackers were shot and killed by police.[5]
The night before the Barcelona attack, an explosion occurred in a house in the Catalan town of Alcanar, destroying the building and killing two members of the terrorist cell, including the 40-year-old imam thought to be the mastermind.[6] The home had more than 120 gas canisters inside which police believe the cell was attempting to make into one large bomb (or three smaller bombs to be placed in three vans that they had rented) but which they accidentally detonated.[7][4]
The Prime Minister of Spain, Mariano Rajoy, called the attack in Barcelona a jihadist attack.[8] Amaq News Agency attributed indirect responsibility for the attack to the Islamic State.[9] The attacks were the deadliest in Spain since the March 2004 Madrid train bombings and the deadliest in Barcelona since the 1987 Hipercor bombing.[10] Younes Abouyaaqoub, the driver of the van in the Barcelona attack, was killed by police in Subirats, a town 31 kilometres (19 mi) west of Barcelona on 21 August.[4]”
So Spain is obligated by treaty to come to the defense of the US. I don’t see any mutual defense treaty with Israel.
Bottom line is this: Jews want group benefits, but not group responsibility. If you are going to qualify for special treatment exclusively on the basis of your membership in a group, then don’t be surprised when people blame you for the stuff about your group that they don’t like. It’s the flip side of affirmative action. Same with blacks. Every one of them is a victim of slavery and deserves eternal reparations, but when it comes to violent crime, then it’s only a small percentage who are to blame and it’s racist to treat them all like potential criminals.
God’s Choosin’ People
As a category the determination of Jews is creating by following specific membership algorithm more like freemasons, not following racial categories.
One of the cause célèbres in Israel at the moment is about the 21 year old Alina Palhati who was murdered by Hamas terrorists at the Nova music festival on October 7th.

She was a patriotic Israeli, soldier in the army. Her maternal grandmother is not Jewish which is one of the acceptance conditions for the Orthodox Jewish rules, so she was doing conversion to Judaism as a kind of soldier scholarship.
But, she was murdered while she was 6 months from graduation date in the conversion course. So, because the date of murder was October 7th 2023 before graduation, she has been buried in the non-Jewish cemetery.
This becomes a scandal, as her parents said it was like she has been murdered not only the first time by Hamas, but a second time by Israel. Her mother is speaking in the parliament in Jerusalem saying she should be allowed in the Jewish cemetery because that was her dream. But the cemetery authorities are saying “we cannot change the membership rules”.
If Hamas attacks 6 months later, April 7th 2024 she would been buried in the Jewish cemetery. But there they cannot disobey the impersonal algorithm which could have been derived from the Bible in some way.
In this example, the date of death determines if she is buried in the Jewish cemetery or the non-Jewish cemetery. Of course, this is not like a genetically determined categories could be changing depending on the date of your death.
Somehow though, it's "antisemitic" for Whites to say there are anti-White Jews. Why is that?
Is the argument that anti-White Jews don't exist? They obviously do. Or is the argument that it is simply antisemitic to criticize Jews?
It's seems obvious that they're using a double standard, and getting away with it. People are starting to notice.Replies: @Hypnotoad666
Exactly. The MSM pearl-clutching about the tweet, pretty much proves the tweet is accurate — i.e., thinking they might not favor you, is somehow proof that you are against them.
It’s also sort of odd to begin with that it’s considered irrationally hateful merely to be “anti” something. Are Jews just so self-evidently wonderful that no single person could fail to be unreservedly in their favor? Can you at least be Jew-neutral, if you feel you don’t have enough facts to form an opinion?
https://twitter.com/breakingbaht/status/1724892505647296620Accusing Jews of pushing dialectical hatred is not neutral. It is a serious and false accusation, as is accusing the Jews of flooding the country with hordes of minorities.
Of course I see the Jews accused of these two things (and worse) on Unz every day so around here these blood libels seem commonplace and not shocking. But out in the real world these are serious, anti-Semitic accusations and Musk is (rightly) going to get punched back hard for trying to bring these fringe views out from under their rock and into mainstream discourse in America.Replies: @Cagey Beast, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Technite78, @Alec Leamas (working from home), @New Dealer, @SFG, @clifford brown, @PhysicistDave, @Alec Leamas (working from home)
Are Mexicans Spaniards, Indians, or mestizos?
It depends on which is more advantageous for the individual at the moment.
There is nothing about this specific to these two groups. The answer is versatile; it can conceivably be used by any other with two or more potential identities. Are mulattoes/Coloured white or black?
Are Britons European, or sui generis?
Are Japanese Asians, or sui generis?
Are Palestinians Arabs, or indigenous?Fun fact: the composer of "Hava Nagila" was born in Jerusalem in the 19th century. It was based on a folk tune genre called a niggun.
When will that term be changed?Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
In your case, your ‘usable’ answer is for the use of silly sophistry, not truth.
Here are the true, rather than ‘usable’, answers to the dumb questions you present:
Q.) Are Jews a religious or an ethnic group?
A.) Ethnic, breed, or racial group.
Q.) Are Mexicans Spaniards, Indians, or mestizos?
A.) Which Mexicans? “Mexican” is a geographical-origin category.
Are mulattoes/Coloured white or black? Black.
Are Britons European, or sui generis? European.
Are Japanese Asians, or sui generis? Asians.
Are Palestinians Arabs, or indigenous? Arabs.
The “West “ would soon collapse . Elon could return as Emperor Elon then and start the rebuild.Replies: @Jack D
Musk’s grandpa defected from Canada to S. Africa. Didn’t really turn out to be a good choice.
I don’t think a million white engineers would follow Musk to China. I don’t think Musk would go in the 1st place. Really rich guys with gadfly tendencies tend to disappear in China.
Musk is going to have to stay here and deal with the consequences of his big mouth. He has already lost a huge amount of $ on X (Twitter) and now he is going to lose even more.
I remember reading some nigro memoir–either “Manchild in the Promised Land”. or else it was “comedian” Dick Gregory’s autobiography, which he entitled “N****r” (He used the actual word).
Anyway, the author, whoever it was, was recounting as a kid when he was talking with his little brother, who had asked (or “axed” LOL) the difference between Whites and jews. Older brother said
White people is all mean and stingy. If they more mean than stingy, they White. If they more stingy than mean, they jews.
It's also sort of odd to begin with that it's considered irrationally hateful merely to be "anti" something. Are Jews just so self-evidently wonderful that no single person could fail to be unreservedly in their favor? Can you at least be Jew-neutral, if you feel you don't have enough facts to form an opinion?Replies: @Jack D
I’d take neutral but this didn’t sound neutral to me. Here is the post that Musk called the “actual truth”
Accusing Jews of pushing dialectical hatred is not neutral. It is a serious and false accusation, as is accusing the Jews of flooding the country with hordes of minorities.
Of course I see the Jews accused of these two things (and worse) on Unz every day so around here these blood libels seem commonplace and not shocking. But out in the real world these are serious, anti-Semitic accusations and Musk is (rightly) going to get punched back hard for trying to bring these fringe views out from under their rock and into mainstream discourse in America.
- You're right that Musk will be punished for endorsing this. Goodie for you guys.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/nyt-we-can-replace-them/Replies: @Jack D
I hope I don't see anymore of this kind of scribbling around here from now on.Replies: @Twinkie
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1724908287471272299
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1724934935943979269
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1724896736412660188
I recited some odious positions of the ADL to you recently and you rightly replied that not all Jews agree with ADL. Just as I do not have the same views as George W Bush. I respect that position. But now we're back to the tired old emotional reaction that any negative remark about a Jewish organization is antisemitic! I hope you retract with the honorable excuse of being too hurried to understand the whole context.
Ben Shapiro said Musk’s criticisms of ADL are apt. Is Ben Shapiro antisemitic now?
https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1725224334070071524
https://twitter.com/stevenmackeyman/status/1724994565294432316
He is deeply offended by racism of any kind.
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1724933980276084909
He seems to be on the verge of banning demands for decolonization, deeming them genocidal against Jews (and any other population the demand can be aimed at).
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1724936047489167852
ADL thanked him! https://twitter.com/JGreenblattADL/status/1725652667119092100
Finally, https://twitter.com/stclairashley/status/1725592241459138686
Addendum: he engages in multiple political topics, not just the ADL. see my https://www.unz.com/isteve/hispanic-paradox-why-do-mestizos-live-so-long/#comment-6265344Replies: @Pixo, @Rick P
*Liberal and libertarian* Jews are, well, liberals (modern or classical), and even if they're against cancel culture tend to be pro-immigration--look at Bryan 'Open Borders' Caplan or Matt 'One Billion Americans' Yglesias. (Can you think of anything more horrifying?) You can find guys like Yascha Mounk and Stephen Pinker who realize identity politics is horrible for them (and for the country), but they're all for LGBTQED, and have 1d2-1 kids (not that I'm in any position to criticize) unless they're super rich.
As for *leftists*, well, everything is part of white supremacy, which must be torn down, to allow us to create The Great Socialist State (That Has Never Been *Tried*!) They want to wreck Israel too, but that's cold comfort. Their being Jewish is kind of peripheral at this point, except in the historical sense. They're leftists, what else is there to say? I have to admit some things like a national healthcare system like, oh, *every other rich country in the world* might not be so bad, but the doofuses want to turn this country into the USSR. Or China, before it became capitalist and stopped running up death tolls that put Stalin to shame. Or CHAZ/CHOP. We need to defund the cops, unless they're putting people in jail for being racist!
Technically I should differentiate between anarchists and communists, but they're both open-borders, so who cares?Oh, and if anyone tries to tell you the Great Replacement is fake, remind them it was actually in a book called 'The Emerging Democratic Majority', written by a pair of Democratic consultants (one of whom has gone apostate--not the Jewish one, of course). Now excuse me while I go puke.
How is this not an indictment of Greenblatt and how he has run the ADL?
https://twitter.com/snarwani/status/1725138601996853424Replies: @Anonymous
No special term for criticism of Russians or Chinese or Arabs (who actually are Semites, unlike most Jews!) or, for that matter, Germans or French or Englishmen.
Why?
Jack, a while back I pointed out some of the really nasty aspects of Judaism -- e.g., the slaughter of the three thousand in Exodus 32 because they held the wrong religious views or YHWH's command for genocide against Amalek (1 Samuel 15) -- and you just went ballistic.
Why?
I've said many critical things about Christians, Ukrainians, Koreans, etc., all of which is permitted.
But not, it seems, the Jews.
Why?
Again: I have said many, many times that of course there are many decent, ethical Jews as well as many slimy contemptible Jews, just as the same can be said for Poles and Brazilians and any other ethnic group.
But offer a factually true criticism of (some) Jews or (some aspects of) Judaism, and that is "anti-Semitic."
Why?
Tell us why, Jack.Replies: @Jonathan Mason, @Hibernian
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYPAvT-3Fvs
This is reasoned, measured, and well supported.Replies: @Twinkie, @vinteuil
The famous Jowett was a 19th century Oxford don who became Master of Balliol. A wag wrote:
First come I; my name is Jowett. There's no knowledge, but I know it. I am the Master of this college. What I don't know isn't knowledge.Replies: @Reg Cæsar
Upon reading Steve’s comment, I immediately leapt to my copy of Basil Cottle’s Penguin Dictionary of Surnames, in which Jewison doesn’t appear, but Jewett does, leading to the entry for Jowett. Which agrees with what you posted, which is on Ancestry.com. So Jewison is ultimately Roman. Imagine that.
Jewel(l) is given three possible derivations, from Breton, from a trade name for a jeweler, or from Joel, the last of which is Hebrew. Cowen/Cowan derives from McEwan/McOwen, which are from Gaelic names, perhaps themselves derived from Greek. (The eu- in eugenics!)
The amazing Jewsbury is disappointing– or reassuring, depending on one’s viewpoint– it’s merely a mangling of Dewsbury, in Yorkshire. (Today’s Dewsbury is itself disappointing.)
A parodic version of this was recorded by >>ahem…<< Steely Don in the 1970s.
The weekend at the college
Didn’t turn out like you planned
The things that pass for knowledge
I can’t understand
Jeremiah 16:16 ..fishing time is over, the hunters are showing up .
Basically the answer is “It depends”, and that comes down to some combination of IIGFTJ, and IIGFM.
That is the fly in the ointment of the Jewish slave trader narrative. Even if Jews ran the slave trade (they didn't) today's Jews are as responsible for what they did as white Americans are responsible for Pizzaro.Replies: @Dmon, @James J. O'Meara, @Pop Warner, @Corpse Tooth, @Bill P, @mc23, @Buzz Mohawk, @Pastit, @Stan Adams, @Wj
By 15th century standards Pizzaro was of the dastardy Spanish race. Nations were seen as Races until very recently.
I am not sure when the term White became synonomous European.
“The Naturalization Act of 1790 of the United State limited naturalization to “free White person(s) … of good character”,”. It covered Jews and people of the Eastern Mediterranean except by some quirk of legal reasoning,, Muslims.
So perhaps the Jewish intellectuals clubbing Whites using a contrived social theory are partly right in saying Whiteness is a social construct. The construct included Jews because Jews were seen as part of the European fabric.
It didn’t hurt that Jews looked like John Podhoretz. It’s a shame to see European Jews saying they’re not White. They’re literally denying their maternal bloodline.
https://twitter.com/breakingbaht/status/1724892505647296620Accusing Jews of pushing dialectical hatred is not neutral. It is a serious and false accusation, as is accusing the Jews of flooding the country with hordes of minorities.
Of course I see the Jews accused of these two things (and worse) on Unz every day so around here these blood libels seem commonplace and not shocking. But out in the real world these are serious, anti-Semitic accusations and Musk is (rightly) going to get punched back hard for trying to bring these fringe views out from under their rock and into mainstream discourse in America.Replies: @Cagey Beast, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Technite78, @Alec Leamas (working from home), @New Dealer, @SFG, @clifford brown, @PhysicistDave, @Alec Leamas (working from home)
– Musk should have found a better tweet to signal boost but its main point still stands.
– You’re right that Musk will be punished for endorsing this. Goodie for you guys.
Spain also doesn’t occupy someone else’s land, whom they corral into concentration camps and then torture and slaughter by the tens of thousands. But when the Chosen People do it, you celebrate it.
==
If the Arabs on the West Bank and Gaza wanted an end to the Jewish presence there and an Arab state in those two territories, they’d have taken that deal when it was offered. They spurned it, twice. Because ‘the occupation’ is not their complaint. Their complaint is that there’s a thriving Jewish state in the eastern Mediterranean.
==
There are no concentration camps, there is no torture, and the only people ‘slaughtered’ are combatants and civilians in the line of fire during battles the Arab bosses have elected to fight.
==
You and your unfortunate family would benefit from living in this world and not in the world of your poisonous imagination.
Congratulations.
https://electronicintifada.net/content/misrepresentation-baraks-offer-camp-david-generous-and-unprecedented/3991
There’s a silver lining to Podhoretz’s comment. It shows our upper levels of government are far more diverse then mere skin tone would indicate. The president’s cabinet is majority non-white.
To further embrace diversity lets move to a millet system and cap social representation by race. Limit Whites to 58%, Blacks 13% etc.
No, that’s what is known as “folk etymology”. Others have commented on it.
I distinctly remember reading a Norman Podhoretz (father of John Podhoretz) article years ago (early 90s I think) in which he called Jews a “White Ethnic Group.” It was an aside, not the theme of the article, but he wrote it.
I found the modest house she lived in in 1930, thanks to that year's census, and checked it out. (IRL, though you can do it via Google Maps and Earth now, too.) Mr Rosenthal* had a small business in sporting goods, perhaps equipping the "Scots" of Macalester College a short walk away. There were a plethora of "white ethnic groups" around-- two Catholic (and one Presbyterian!) colleges nearby, and Jews "covenanted" out of the city next door. German-Norwegian Charles M Schulz's family barber shop was about a mile away. (Though 1930 was the one year they spent in Needles, Calif., so you won't find them on Midge's page.)
* Here's a 1982 interview with him.
He’s a satisfactory book reviewer, but otherwise was never better than mediocre at the trade he chose. His mother and father appear to have used their connections on his behalf rather than dissuading him. He has a sister, Ruthie Blum, who writes for the Jerusalem Post &c (never read her) and another sister, Naomi, who produces occasional journalism but earns her living in the PR business. Naomi’s writing is better than his. His father was a capable editor, not someone who produced original content that was all that engaging. His mother was the writer in the family. No clue what the right career for JP would have been – English teacher, perhaps.
Well done.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Podhoretz
John Podhoretz has a nephew Noam Blum.
https://www.tabletmag.com/contributors/noam-blumhttps://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1216175467960684544
https://twitter.com/neontaster/status/1270718837755768832
Wouldn't an English teacher know how to spell "repellent"?
https://twitter.com/jpodhoretz/status/903440382494728192Replies: @Colin Wright, @Poirot
Does Zionism equal Jewish supremacy? When will American Jews condemn Frankfurt/New School cultural Marxism, an ideology that directly targets American and European whites from a Christian background?Replies: @Art Deco
I’ll ask my vascular surgeon why he hasn’t persuaded his partners to put up a notice at the reception desk denouncing Frankfurt School Marxism.
a) Israeli nationalists who pick middle Eastern looking Jews so as to prove that Jews are indigenous middle Easterners who came back home
b) in the US- not elsewhere- race grifters & some alienated people who emotionally "don't belong" to the Western world. In their case, it is more about identity & attitude that West is a hostile and alien place (Susan "white race is the cancer" Sontag). I can understand these psychos, but that leaves them at...what? They don't try to establish something "non white" (whatever it means) as their cultural identity. They don't try to racheldolezhalize phenotypically.
Never mind, it's basically a mental condition ...Replies: @Dmitry
Jewish culture have an almost completely different categorization system than the Western racial categories, which in their view is the important categorization and doesn’t follow the Western categorization of white/black/brown/yellow which develops in the late 19th century.
It’s like how aristocrats historically were not following later racial designation, they were interested in the division between land-owners vs non-landowners. Nobody of the 19th century categorizes Pushkin because of African ancestry. The important categorization for the landowning culture of the time, is Pushkin is a gentleman or not?
If you said to Pushkin “your important category is as a person of color, not as a gentleman”, he would say “what nonsense are you saying? I am a gentleman”.
It’s only a foreign culture of the 21st century, which is re-categorizing Pushkin in terms of the racial categories. While for us to categorize in terms of concepts like serfs would seem strange, although it’s still more accurate in Russia than ethnicity
–
For Jews, group identity is based in terms of particular political/religious tribes.
Their identity is special clothing, education system, songs, national festival, religion, politics, rules of the romantic life and magical thinking in cult groups.
If you want to know the identity there, you look more at their clothes and behavior, different festivals and the different kind of veneration.
For example, religious nationalists are different races, but you can always them because they have different clothing. The women are not allowed to wear trousers. Women and men are separated to different areas. They have special festivals.
Secular Jewish culture is based in worship of the state, army and patriotism. They also have behaviors from the kibbutz culture. But the racial groups are diverging and they absorb different immigrants’ groups from the second and third world.
There are also Haredim inbreeding cults which each small group has different clothes and hats to signify between each other their group and their status. They don’t believe in rational worldview, but in supernatural categories, magical thinking, effects of inbreeding.
If you asked those people if they are white or brown? It’s like discussing with religious 18th century people,.
They have such strange categories and views, they will be sometimes only controllable for a modern state because they follow an internal principle of non-violence beyond spitting. For example, they call the Israeli police Nazis and non-Jews.
I would just generalize: race is a relatively novel concept. Putting aside leftist blather, it is true that it came into being through more frequent contacts with other human collectives who look significantly different & who are alien in their beliefs and customs.
Herodotus describes Hellenes as a group defined by their ancestry, language, way of life, religion and customs. I would say that for traditional peoples those two signifiers were central- ancestry & beliefs/way of life/religion. That's why some old Hebrews' religious chiefs, Hellenized, were negotiating with rulers of the post-Alexander Hellenic empire about local privileges, invoking (mythic) common ancestry with Spartans. This was not just a trick- they truly believed in this imaginary common bond with Spartans' ancestors.
Also, the Bible frequently talks about genealogy. Is this a proto-racial thing, then? When Ezra came from the Babylonian captivity, he urged local Jews to get rid of their non-Jewish wives. Was it a "racial" thing? I wouldn't say so. It was very likely a period of national crystallization through matrilineal descent, so it was nothing particularly racial, but essentially a form of religious nationalism in statu nascendi.
We can see this now in the stubbornness of many Jews in their refusal to acknowledge Jewish identity to individuals who have Jewish father & not Jewish mother. So, if a man has a Jewish mother & doesn't give a hoot about Judaism, he is, in their eyes, a Jew; on the other hand, a person with just a Jewish father who may be truly emotionally connected to Jewish identity is not considered to be a Jew, even if he goes through some non-Orthodox conversion practices. So, it is, fundamentally, about religious dogmas codified many centuries ago.
But- does it work?
I guess in theory yes, but in practice I think that even hard-core religionists can't seriously claim that someone born to Jewish mother, raised & living as a practicing Christian is a Jew. They do claim such things, but in reality it doesn't work. And such a person doesn't consider himself to be Jewish, except in some extraordinary, extremely marginal cases.
Hitler killed many people who he decreed to be Jewish, but, who actually were not.
In other cases, in the US, many, perhaps most Jewish communities accept those born to Jewish mothers, but with black fathers- and it is not some kind of liberal humanitarian magnanimity, but a diluted version of ancient religious practice.
To sum it- Jews are defined, even in secular societies, by religious prescripts which may be slightly modified, but their roots are safely anchored in that religious culture's history. That is why some white advocates like Jared Taylor are wrong when they accuse Jews like Yoram Hazony - I think I remember his name correctly- of hypocrisy of "betraying" their supposedly common principles- Jews view the social-cultural-national world differently & their position is not compatible with the dominant modern, post 18th C, European perspective. Simply, these are different world-views. There is a "naturally racialist" perspective even among non-extremist Europeans. Modern Europeans are truly secular & they don't view the world through Christian lens- unlike American Christian fundamentalists. For some of them- not all- Christianity comes first & they would put black Christians before white American atheists belonging to the Western civilization & American nation- which is, essentially, a throwback to the medieval mentality.
Other cultures & races have their own criteria, but they also evolved through history.
Chinese, aware of their huge numbers, swallowed Caucasians- mostly Iranians & Turks- who came with Mongols & stayed after the expulsion of Mongol ruling elites. They did it through intermarriage, so these Caucasians disappeared in the Chinese sea. Just, the Chinese are highly suspicious of intermarriage with whites- now, when their perception of the world is wider. Japanese are even more racially conscious. Generally, with very few exceptions, east Asians abhor the very idea of mixing with blacks. Their race consciousness is much higher than that of an average Klansman.
With Hindus, the primary collective identity is that of caste.
At the end, I would say that, for whites/Europeans, things differ by sex. A significant number of white women would be OK with their child belonging to a different race. With men-not so. Most white men, secular Europeans, if they somehow impregnated a woman of a different race, would accept a daughter visually belonging to another race. With sons- very rarely.
Men want their sons to be mirror images of themselves, at least when it comes to race. That is the reality. Replies: @Dmitry
Because having one’s name spelled wrong will not get your application sent to the virtual recycle bin. Being checked off as [√] White probably will.
See, this is why you don’t appreciate movies, Jonathan. You can’t figure out what’s going on.
The dude on the right in this filmed encounter is Jewish. How do we know? Read the backstory to Podhoretz’s tweet at Commentary. Podhoretz will tell you that he has to be Jewish. Ha, ha, ha.
https://twitter.com/breakingbaht/status/1724892505647296620Accusing Jews of pushing dialectical hatred is not neutral. It is a serious and false accusation, as is accusing the Jews of flooding the country with hordes of minorities.
Of course I see the Jews accused of these two things (and worse) on Unz every day so around here these blood libels seem commonplace and not shocking. But out in the real world these are serious, anti-Semitic accusations and Musk is (rightly) going to get punched back hard for trying to bring these fringe views out from under their rock and into mainstream discourse in America.Replies: @Cagey Beast, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Technite78, @Alec Leamas (working from home), @New Dealer, @SFG, @clifford brown, @PhysicistDave, @Alec Leamas (working from home)
Let’s imagine there are Jews (and others) “flooding the country with hordes of minorities”. Should there be a penalty paid by those Jews (and others) or not? And if so, what should it be?
https://www.unz.com/isteve/nyt-we-can-replace-them/
https://twitter.com/breakingbaht/status/1724892505647296620Accusing Jews of pushing dialectical hatred is not neutral. It is a serious and false accusation, as is accusing the Jews of flooding the country with hordes of minorities.
Of course I see the Jews accused of these two things (and worse) on Unz every day so around here these blood libels seem commonplace and not shocking. But out in the real world these are serious, anti-Semitic accusations and Musk is (rightly) going to get punched back hard for trying to bring these fringe views out from under their rock and into mainstream discourse in America.Replies: @Cagey Beast, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Technite78, @Alec Leamas (working from home), @New Dealer, @SFG, @clifford brown, @PhysicistDave, @Alec Leamas (working from home)
Are they both false because you feel it implies *all* Jews are doing these things (which of course they aren’t), or because you feel *no* Jews are doing these things?
You mean “Comedy (Confederate) gold with that line.”
Now more historically accurate.
Can I call myself a Bajan?The more I hear "white", the more I prefer "Caucasian". (Which is more correct than you imagine.) And it already comes with a majuscule.Hell, I'm 100% NW-of-Munich European. This African
chickmatriarch is whiter than me:https://images.theconversation.com/files/171606/original/file-20170531-25673-88zoc3.jpgReplies: @res
This one?
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/04/scoop-white-kids-work-obama/
That’s because they are not white.
Race is both a biological and social construct. You need to have European DNA to be biologically White, but socially, you can’t be a Latin American of Spanish or Portuguese ancestry. You can’t be Ashkenazi. You can’t be Romani. You also can’t have any amount of non-European DNA.
I don’t care what the woke government says. American culture operates on hypodescent. You belong to whichever segment of your DNA has the lowest social status, with Whites at the top and Abos at the bottom. Blacks are 2nd lowest status. I presume Ashkenazi Jews are 2nd highest status, because they have light skin, high socioecomic status, and some White ancestry, but they are not White.
What’s unclear is which groups have higher status than which other groups among the “middle-status” races: East Asians, Subcons, Hispanics, Native Americans, and Polynesians. If someone is half East Asian and half Hispanic, are they East Asian or Hispanic? What about half Native American and half Maori?
You've said you find it declasse' for Whites (but only Whites) to do that. So why do Jewish Billionaires get a pass, even though they're far more aggressive in pushing the interests of their people?Replies: @TWS, @Citizen of a Silly Country
I’m guessing Steve has the old liberal wasp attitude towards race advocacy, good enough for other groups but whites don’t really need to worry about it. He’s advocated for a modest amount of AA for blacks, and Indians, but not for anyone else.
Whites are supposed to be above it all because apparently they have enough to never worry about it.
==
If the Arabs on the West Bank and Gaza wanted an end to the Jewish presence there and an Arab state in those two territories, they'd have taken that deal when it was offered. They spurned it, twice. Because 'the occupation' is not their complaint. Their complaint is that there's a thriving Jewish state in the eastern Mediterranean.
==
There are no concentration camps, there is no torture, and the only people 'slaughtered' are combatants and civilians in the line of fire during battles the Arab bosses have elected to fight.
==
You and your unfortunate family would benefit from living in this world and not in the world of your poisonous imagination.Replies: @bjondo, @HammerJack
Willful horseshit is a lubed ticket back to Hell.
Congratulations.
” European Jews” – I see what you did there. OTOH when it comes to Christians involved in the slave trade, you call them “Portuguese”, but when you mention the Portuguese (Sephardic) Jews who you say profited from the slave trade, they are suddenly “European Jews” and not Portuguese Jews.
Should modern day Poles and Lithuanians feel responsible for what the Portuguese did in Africa? If not, what blame should I as an Ashkenazi Jew accept for the actions of the Sephardic Jews who are as remote from me as Portuguese are from Poles?
But in anti-Semitic discourse, it’s always “the Jews” who ran the slave trade.
Soooo... I'm not casting any stones.
If I'm not responsible for the transactions of some distant relative who was born over 200 years ago, neither are any Jews.
But it would be nice to see a little honesty regarding the reality of antebellum Southern society, which may well have featured the most liberated, equal under the law, unrestricted, respected (and respectable) and un-oppressed Jewish community on earth at the time. Somehow that reality doesn't feature much in movies about the era, although a Jewish actor quite fittingly played Ashley in Gone With the Wind.Replies: @Harry Baldwin, @Jack D
The antebellum Jews of the South were well established and got along well with their neighbors as you say, but you have to understand that they were a tiny, tiny minority. Until the 1840s, when German Jews (along with other Germans) started showing up in large #’s, the total # of Jews in the entire US was under 15,000. In contrast, in the decade between 1900 and 1910, the Jewish population of the US went UP by around 1,000,000, almost all of whom were Ashkenazi Jews from the Pale of Settlement. “Quantity has its own quality” and its hard to think of elegant Southern gentlemen like Judah Benjamin as being part of the same group as the unwashed pickle vendors of the Lower East Side.
After the war, Benjamin became a prominent lawyer in London, arguing before the House of Lords and the Privy Counsel. His French wife, Natalie Benjamin, had the last rites of the Catholic Church administered to Benjamin before his death in Paris in 1884, and funeral services were held in a church prior to his interment at Père Lachaise Cemetery in the St. Martin family crypt. So I’m not sure that Benjamin really gets credit for being on the Jewish team anyway.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/nyt-we-can-replace-them/Replies: @Jack D
The Jews were not the ones who “flooded the country with hordes of [black] minorities” like Stacey Abrams. For that you should blame your ancestors. Should there be a penalty paid by those Christians (and their descendants) who did this, which was, in many ways, the much greater sin?
The real question is whether or not Jewishness is a blood or racial distinction. I would maintain that it is not. In biblical terms, a Jew is someone covenanted into the people of Abraham by circumcision. An Eskimo could be Jewish through conversion, and while not ethnically linked to a Jew from the middle East or Eastern Europe, would be completely Jewish. Jews can be White, Black, Brown, Red, or Yellow.
I don’t know about that.
Israel is mistreating the Palestinians horribly, but there’s so much evil in the world, and so much human suffering, yet the masses don’t usually care much, if it even registers.
The MSM needs to whip them into a frenzy, like it had done over Ukraine. Yet that’s obviously not what’s happened with Israel.
Another possible reason could be America’s involvement and moral responsibility for the carnage. But America also bears responsibility for the jihadist bloodbath of the last decade, yet many of the same people – now outraged over the Palestinians’ plight, furious with Israel and unabashedly denouncing Zionism as evil – only denied or relativized those crimes (as much as the horrific brutality allowed them to), and stigmatized anyone attempting any honest discussion of the ideology driving them and the societies that harbor it.
So while some combination of the suffering inflicted on the victims and the US enabling it obviously is crucial to some people (those few who have been halfway consistent), I don’t really think that’s the motivation for most. The Ashkenazi being seen as white and Western seems far more important.
(Art Deco with an impassioned defense of neoconservatism in 3, 2, 1…)
Ouch.
Well done.
I wrote in the present tense, addressing your claim of “serious and false accusation[s]”:
Do you concede there are guilty Jews (and others) in the here and now “flooding the country with hordes of minorities”?
I don't think a million white engineers would follow Musk to China. I don't think Musk would go in the 1st place. Really rich guys with gadfly tendencies tend to disappear in China.
Musk is going to have to stay here and deal with the consequences of his big mouth. He has already lost a huge amount of $ on X (Twitter) and now he is going to lose even more.Replies: @Buzz Mohawk, @Thea
Jack (ass!) I’m reading Walter Isaacson’s biography of Musk right now. Elon Musk has been through this shit before. He thrives on it. You don’t know what the fuck you are talking about, but that is par for your particular, tiresome course.
Go back to reading Tommy Wolf’s “Right Stuff” and calling astronauts “Spam in the Can.” That was one of your real winners!
You are painfully pedestrian and predictable.
You wrote:
Spoken like a True Jew Mafioso!
Fewer and fewer people are buying into your shit now.
Screw you!
https://time.com/6336614/tesla-and-x-face-advertiser-and-investor-fallout-over-elon-musks-controversial-post/
Steve, if you and other conservative social media stars don't support Elon Musk, then he is going to get cancelled and no one will dare to challenge Jewish power again. They will feel enboldened to end democracy through vote rigging. We must support Elon to save democracy in America.Replies: @Charles Erwin Wilson, @duncsbaby
Okay, what do we need to do to support the hyper-rich Elon Musk? Are you sure he needs our help?
The black lady on that hysterical women morning show got put on time out for saying that The Holocaust was a white on white crime.
So yeah, the Jews don’t consider themselves white.
==
If the Arabs on the West Bank and Gaza wanted an end to the Jewish presence there and an Arab state in those two territories, they'd have taken that deal when it was offered. They spurned it, twice. Because 'the occupation' is not their complaint. Their complaint is that there's a thriving Jewish state in the eastern Mediterranean.
==
There are no concentration camps, there is no torture, and the only people 'slaughtered' are combatants and civilians in the line of fire during battles the Arab bosses have elected to fight.
==
You and your unfortunate family would benefit from living in this world and not in the world of your poisonous imagination.Replies: @bjondo, @HammerJack
“That deal” wasn’t spurned, it was spurious. And you know this as well as I do, Jewish media propaganda to the contrary.
https://electronicintifada.net/content/misrepresentation-baraks-offer-camp-david-generous-and-unprecedented/3991
I don't think a million white engineers would follow Musk to China. I don't think Musk would go in the 1st place. Really rich guys with gadfly tendencies tend to disappear in China.
Musk is going to have to stay here and deal with the consequences of his big mouth. He has already lost a huge amount of $ on X (Twitter) and now he is going to lose even more.Replies: @Buzz Mohawk, @Thea
He did not buy Twitter to make money but for steering the narrative. See Bezos at Wapo.
That is the fly in the ointment of the Jewish slave trader narrative. Even if Jews ran the slave trade (they didn't) today's Jews are as responsible for what they did as white Americans are responsible for Pizzaro.Replies: @Dmon, @James J. O'Meara, @Pop Warner, @Corpse Tooth, @Bill P, @mc23, @Buzz Mohawk, @Pastit, @Stan Adams, @Wj
Jack, you wrote:
Hey, dipstick! There are at least two points you avoid:
1) Whites like me are being taken along for the slavery-responsibility ride.
2) You conveniently leave out the very same conflation when it happens to “your” own people.
Gee, Whites like me can endure all the anti-White, racial HATE promulgated in part by YOUR very own tribe…
While YOU get to differentiate between “your particular brand of Jews” and some other type that you say actually participated in the slave trade.
Good move, counsellor. You really do appear to be full of hatred for me, hatred hidden inside deceit.
My Southern mother grew up poor, really poor. My father and his people never had anything to do with slavery. Yet I, as a White man, have endured endless crap facilitated by the likes of you.
Fewer and fewer Americans are falling for your con job. Many are waking up now, while you support the way -out-of-proportion bombing, blasting, baby-killing genocide and takeover of land by the very people you support and identify with — while my own tax dollars pay for the genocide you want there.
These are not nice people.
And see here for a compilation of what Israelis are saying right now supprting genocide of the Palestinians: "Amalek," for those unfamiliar with Jewish culture, is one of the many, many examples of genocide praised in the Hebrew Bible -- see 1 Samuel 15:And now Bibi is open that this is what he has planned for the innocents among the Palestinians.
And, no, not all Israelis and not all Jews feel this way: note that the video compilation comes from a Jewish woman, "Katie Halper A Jew For #CeasefireNow." There really are decent Jews and Israelis.
But a lot of them aren't.
So, will Jack D repudiate what Bibi said?Replies: @clifford brown
https://youtu.be/Npex5-nhD9I?si=xOU91TPaMv0WaV8iReplies: @HammerJack, @common noticer, @Currahee, @Pastit
The Jews owned the Slavs trade. They made millions off it. Wallace the Jew is long dead in his pine coffin and his loathsome sleazy son is no better.
That is the fly in the ointment of the Jewish slave trader narrative. Even if Jews ran the slave trade (they didn't) today's Jews are as responsible for what they did as white Americans are responsible for Pizzaro.Replies: @Dmon, @James J. O'Meara, @Pop Warner, @Corpse Tooth, @Bill P, @mc23, @Buzz Mohawk, @Pastit, @Stan Adams, @Wj
Your brethren sure as hell did you like basterd
A lot of Jews believe that they may be descended from the people who were kicked out of Israel 2000 years ago
It’s worth remembering that the Romans did not expel the Jews from Palestine. It’s a popular belief but it’s just an urban myth.
What the Romans did do – for how long I don’t know – was ban Jews from living permanently in Jerusalem.
No. The Jews are not “flooding the country with hordes of minorities” in order to replace white people. Flat no. A pure and damnable lie. Every other poor person on the planet would like to leave his shitty country and come to America. They don’t need the Jews to encourage them. The coyotes that bring people across the border are not Jewish. The focus on Jews is bizarre.
Wherever they went, the Jews threw open to them the gates of the principal cities, so that in an incredibly short time the Africans were masters of all Spain save the little kingdom of the Asturias in the northern mountains, where the Christian survivors who were unwilling to accept Islam reassembled and prepared to win back their heritage… (p.17)
Everywhere the Spanish Jews opened the gates of cities to the conquerors, and the Moslems rewarded them by turning over to them the government of Granada, Seville and Cordoba. “Without any love for the soil where they lived, without any of those affections that ennoble a people, and finally without sentiments of generosity,” says Amador de los Rios, “they aspired only to feed their avarice and to accomplish the ruin of the Goths; taking the opportunity to manifest their rancour, and boasting of the hatreds that they had hoarded up so many centuries.”
…In the new Moslem state the Jews found themselves highly esteemed. It was under the caliphs that they attained the height of their prosperity… (p. 259)Replies: @Jack D
You've said you find it declasse' for Whites (but only Whites) to do that. So why do Jewish Billionaires get a pass, even though they're far more aggressive in pushing the interests of their people?Replies: @TWS, @Citizen of a Silly Country
Steve is an old-fashioned missionary. His religion is the Enlightenment. Like all missionaries, he holds his own people to a higher standard than the heathen.
The heathen not living up to Enlightenment ideals, while not great, is understandable in Steve’s mind. They are heathen, after all. But whites misbehaving by, say, wanting to think of themselves as a group, is unforgivable.
Steve would have made a great pastor or small college professor in 19th century New England. He’s definitely not made for the 21st century.
The Ideological Age is ending. The Demographic Age has begun. Steve laments that.
Cited minority-immigration and White-replacement booster Michelle Goldberg of the New York Times and White-replacement enforcer Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas are not Jewish? What about less well-known groups like HIAS? They’re not Jewish either?
Anyway, given the fury about the latest tweet by Elon Musk which is regarded as anti-Semitic and has caused major advertisers like Apple and IBM to “pause” advertising on Twitter (X), what do all those who thought it would be a good thing for Elon Musk to take over Twitter and abolish any kind of censorship think now?
One may not actually like the state of Israel too much, but stirring up personal hatred against Jewish neighbors in the USA or Europe is quite another thing.
(Part of the problem is the O.T. of the Christian Bible which provides a lot of very misleading information which many people take for granted and confuse with real history, and the N.T. story about the Roman Governor Marcus Pontius Pilatus being quite willing to let Jesus go free as a harmless nutcase, but having his hand forced by a baying Jewish mob to crucify the pacifist preacher.
It would be a good thing if people got the message out that the Bible stories are probably not very historically accurate.)
Anti-white, in this context, means defaming the historical American nation consisting mostly of Euro-Americans with various specifically American traditions.
True, not many white Gentile Americans are publicly against this suicidal policy; also; Musk is also to blame- as far as I know, Jared Taylor still does not have his account back at Twitter/X. But there are public figures, some of them even "mixed blood", but European at heart like Ricardo Duchesne who strongly oppose ruination of the West.
There are Jews galore who behave absolutely unacceptably re. immvasion & barely 2-3 voices against.
Such things irritate people who notice what's happening. And the same type of behavior in Italy, too. https://www.unz.com/runz/did-the-neocons-save-the-world-from-the-thucydides-trap/?showcomments#comment-5922414
This one purported to explain the Gospels differently, using a bunch of interesting Roman and Judaean history, and the crux (no pun intended) was Pontius Pilate's* personality. Their alternate explanation just sucked. It was from PBS. You watch PBS, don't you. You seem like a PBS viewer somehow...
.
* Plus, you're confusing a Roman official from 2,000 years ago with a Swiss made turboprop airplane.
Musk saved Tesla and SpaceX from the brink of disaster. This latest little drama with Twitter (X) has to be familiar territory for him. He can't stand still. He moves on to the next drama with unshakeable ideas in his Aspergery head.
He is often unpleasant for partners, in both romance and business, to be involved with, but he keeps on going and winning.
He sets crazy goals, fires people along the way, and miraculously reaches those goals. His plans for X involve much more than the twitverse. If it survives this Jewish attack, it may surprise you with what it becomes...Replies: @Buzz Mohawk, @Jack D
It's painful and they should stop. What we need are strong voices in the Jewish community to condemn the ADL, the SPLC and many others for their anti-Whitism. In the long run that is the path to living peacefully.
Jews were afraid that their anti-white rhetoric might be too over the top and backfire, making us hate blacks. That’s not how it works 😂
https://www.standard.co.uk/comment/david-baddiel-whoopi-goldberg-antisemitism-holocaust-the-view-b980696.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruthie_Blum
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Podhoretz
John Podhoretz has a nephew Noam Blum.
https://www.tabletmag.com/contributors/noam-blum
Blue eyes = white in my book.Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Graham, @Jay Fink, @anon
I have known one Creole woman in New Orleans with blue eyes. She appeared as white as Ann Coulter until she started talking. Straight (dyed) blonde hair. I never asked her if she used hair relaxer. 50-50 possibility on that.
It seems their purpose is saying things like “We whites are evil” and “I’m proud of being Jewish”, as I paraphrase some well known Jew
Regardless of what some Italian-Americans may or may not have felt, the Jewish writers of the Sopranos are using Italian-Americans as their sock puppets. The Sopranos is a work of fiction after all, and should be looked at no differently than any other product of Jewish controlled Hollywood/mass media.
I read what Musk agreed with & he’s right. ADL is in reality an anti-white organization; also, many public Jews are vocal in support of immigration inundation & they don’t even hide it.
Anti-white, in this context, means defaming the historical American nation consisting mostly of Euro-Americans with various specifically American traditions.
True, not many white Gentile Americans are publicly against this suicidal policy; also; Musk is also to blame- as far as I know, Jared Taylor still does not have his account back at Twitter/X. But there are public figures, some of them even “mixed blood”, but European at heart like Ricardo Duchesne who strongly oppose ruination of the West.
There are Jews galore who behave absolutely unacceptably re. immvasion & barely 2-3 voices against.
Such things irritate people who notice what’s happening. And the same type of behavior in Italy, too. https://www.unz.com/runz/did-the-neocons-save-the-world-from-the-thucydides-trap/?showcomments#comment-5922414
It’s kind of coincidental that you put in your 3rd paragraph here, Jonathan, as I just reviewed the documentary Last Days of Jesus.
This one purported to explain the Gospels differently, using a bunch of interesting Roman and Judaean history, and the crux (no pun intended) was Pontius Pilate’s* personality. Their alternate explanation just sucked. It was from PBS. You watch PBS, don’t you. You seem like a PBS viewer somehow…
.
* Plus, you’re confusing a Roman official from 2,000 years ago with a Swiss made turboprop airplane.
It’s an immeasurably great thing that Musk took over Twitter. Elon’s tweets are icing on the cake. Are you not enjoying the show? Censorship is for slaves. Are you another brick in the wall, Mr. Masonry?
That is the fly in the ointment of the Jewish slave trader narrative. Even if Jews ran the slave trade (they didn't) today's Jews are as responsible for what they did as white Americans are responsible for Pizzaro.Replies: @Dmon, @James J. O'Meara, @Pop Warner, @Corpse Tooth, @Bill P, @mc23, @Buzz Mohawk, @Pastit, @Stan Adams, @Wj
https://www.unz.com/isteve/is-it-safer-to-visit-a-coffee-shop-or-a-gym/#comment-3888811 (#122, etc.)Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
Ugghhhh…. Not the both of your screenplays – they were pretty good, but, that post and comments brings up bad memories. I’d quit commenting for a while, I was so sick of
Covide-19that shit – I noticed none from me. That post was from May 8th ’20, with comments going on through May 12th.I see there was some good common sense coming in from some of the crowd already. Travis had one about obesity that about nailed it. However, my favorite was this one from “Paul”:
Kind of prescient too…
Camouflage strategy ressemble the majority superficially.
Likewise, nobody is going to mistake John Podhoretz, with his substantial R1b admixture, for a J1 or J2 Middle Easterner.
It doesn’t matter what JPod says, or what the Feds say, or even what whites say: It is non-whites, specifically black and browns, who decide who is white.
They have decided that Jews are not only white, but the most privileged whites of all. Uber Whites, as it were. And that’s what matters.
The ‘apartheid’ rhetoric, the South Africa playbook for banishing Israel from the global community (while ignoring the behavior of pretty much every non-white country on earth), this is no accident. Israel is not ruled by a minority population like South Africa, but you can bet that on that fateful day the US is majority non-white, the apartheid talk demonizing American whites will escalate. They’re already making threatening noises (“who will look after you in your old age, hmm whitey?”) and I trust them for one thing, and that’s to carry out their threats.
NATO membership would be a step down for Israel. As is, they get all the defense they need from it (that is, from US, which is all that matters), and none of the obligation or risk
To me, the topic discussed here seems to be crystal clear. “Race” is not just a phenotype or genotype; nor some “social construct”. It is in the Americas & other Europe- derived societies a sense of being a part of the European civilization with roots in Athens and Rome. This state of being comes naturally to Europeans who move to other Western societies. For a big part of highly assimilated Jews, it still remains a sort of double consciousness, a feeling of unease, a friction – from holidays to iconography to many other everyday issues. I guess Heinrich Heine felt that way: To say that being a Jew is just a religion is the same as proclaiming that being a hunchback is a religion.
All things considered, I’d say that, as time goes by, immigrants from Hungary, Germany, Poland, Finland, France,…or even Greece and Russia, after they move to the US, Argentine or Australia..feel “at home”; and with Jews there remains a sense of alienation, being “other”.
In short, an average European seamlessly morphs into other types of Europe-derived people; the average assimilated Jew remains a fellow traveler, not stable in his identity until it, hopefully, finally resolves one way or another.
https://unherd.com/2021/02/jewish-privilege-is-a-myth/
And died in World War II, his plane probably shot down by the Luftwaffe .Replies: @Anonymous, @Steve Sailer
Yes it was the Luftwaffe. They thought Churchill was on the plane.
In 1942, Churchill had flown across the Atlantic, returning from America, and British propaganda had mocked the Luftwaffe for failing to intercept him.
At the time this BOAC airliner was shot down, Churchill was in North Africa, and it was suspected he would try to fly home again under the noses of the Germans.
British intelligence also spread rumors that an important person was on this plane, and one of the passengers had a physical resemblance to Churchill. The Germans had spies in Lisbon so were aware of this.
a) (ostensible) - "that's what the Nazis did, how could you be so hateful, it'll be camps and trains next"
b) (actual) - "we'll be seen as the wealthiest and most privileged group"Replies: @Reg Cæsar
Well, there is that First Amendment thing, too.
Except for “Hispanic”, which was added somewhat cynically in 1970, ethnicity wasn’t asked about until 1980, and even then not that granularly at first.
Before that, there was just race, birthplace, and parents’ birthplaces to go by. Jews would have been ” Russian”, “Polish”, ” Austrian”, “Roumanian”, or what have you. They could have used “Ashkenazi”, ” Sephardi”, etc as an ethnic marker– e.g., Catholic Bernard Nathanson and Episcopalian Lawrence Auster, yes, Jews Sammy Davis Jr and Robert Putnam and Jewesses Ivanka Trump and Sara Blakely, no.
Nathanson & Auster (who, by the way, became Catholic, too) were ethnically Jewish. But here- things become complicated.
I think we can accept "Jewish" as an ethnicity, meaning some kind of proto-national, ethnic identity. Race, as is the case with Sammy Davis jr., is another thing. This is race, not an ethnicity.
Ivanka Trump's ethnicity is not clear. It is not Jewish; but it is not "white" either, because "white" is a race. She, I think, could check Czech, German & Scottish for ethnicity.
Confucian rectification of names- words should correspond to reality.
Thanks to the one-drop rule,”white” doesn’t tell you what you are, only what you aren’t. This is why “Caucasian”, “Anglo-Saxon”, or almost anything else is preferable.
Are Derb’s children white? No. Are they Anglo-Saxon? More than I am, and I bet I am more than a large number of regular commenters here.
Few Americans are of all-English ancestry, but a majority have some. Genealogist and novelist Jeane Weston claimed as much as 82% of us. (Certainly virtually all native blacks and Indians will have some.)
Lots of good charts and maps at that link.
The existence of White subgroups like Anglo-Saxons doesn’t disprove the existence of the larger racial category. You and the likes of joker Ta-Nehisi Coates (“those who believe they are white”) have a weird hangup about recognizing there’s a race called Whites, aka Europeans. White, in America, is just a shorter synonym of “European-American”. Now you know what White is. You’re welcome.
https://twitter.com/breakingbaht/status/1724892505647296620Accusing Jews of pushing dialectical hatred is not neutral. It is a serious and false accusation, as is accusing the Jews of flooding the country with hordes of minorities.
Of course I see the Jews accused of these two things (and worse) on Unz every day so around here these blood libels seem commonplace and not shocking. But out in the real world these are serious, anti-Semitic accusations and Musk is (rightly) going to get punched back hard for trying to bring these fringe views out from under their rock and into mainstream discourse in America.Replies: @Cagey Beast, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Technite78, @Alec Leamas (working from home), @New Dealer, @SFG, @clifford brown, @PhysicistDave, @Alec Leamas (working from home)
It’s an antisemitic canard that Jews have lots of power and influence and can discipline even the most powerful (non-Jewish) Billionaires for criticizing them.
I hope I don’t see anymore of this kind of scribbling around here from now on.
The UK is very different though because about 80% of Jews vote conservative. Baddiel isn’t necessarily one of them, but he’d know that’s how it works. Labour, by contrast, is de facto the Muslims party. The proportion of British Jews still caring whether they’re progressive enough, or on the underdogs side of history etc must be shrinking fast. They’re probably feeling whiter over time.
as late as 1966, there were 38 Jewish Labor MP 's~ 12% of the Parliamentary party whereas only a few Jewish Tory MPs eg Keith Joseph
But Jews are flexible strategists and moved right as sociialims was no more working in UK than in USSR. Plus Tories rated doughty as useful in Cold War 1. By Thatcher era , the ratios had flipped.Replies: @Art Deco, @Houston 1992
https://twitter.com/breakingbaht/status/1724892505647296620Accusing Jews of pushing dialectical hatred is not neutral. It is a serious and false accusation, as is accusing the Jews of flooding the country with hordes of minorities.
Of course I see the Jews accused of these two things (and worse) on Unz every day so around here these blood libels seem commonplace and not shocking. But out in the real world these are serious, anti-Semitic accusations and Musk is (rightly) going to get punched back hard for trying to bring these fringe views out from under their rock and into mainstream discourse in America.Replies: @Cagey Beast, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Technite78, @Alec Leamas (working from home), @New Dealer, @SFG, @clifford brown, @PhysicistDave, @Alec Leamas (working from home)
Jack D, stop defaming Elon Musk. He did not attack “the Jews.” He criticized the ADL by name for its gross hypocrisies.
I recited some odious positions of the ADL to you recently and you rightly replied that not all Jews agree with ADL. Just as I do not have the same views as George W Bush. I respect that position. But now we’re back to the tired old emotional reaction that any negative remark about a Jewish organization is antisemitic! I hope you retract with the honorable excuse of being too hurried to understand the whole context.
Ben Shapiro said Musk’s criticisms of ADL are apt. Is Ben Shapiro antisemitic now?
He is deeply offended by racism of any kind.
He seems to be on the verge of banning demands for decolonization, deeming them genocidal against Jews (and any other population the demand can be aimed at).
ADL thanked him! https://twitter.com/JGreenblattADL/status/1725652667119092100
Finally, https://twitter.com/stclairashley/status/1725592241459138686
Addendum: he engages in multiple political topics, not just the ADL. see my https://www.unz.com/isteve/hispanic-paradox-why-do-mestizos-live-so-long/#comment-6265344
https://en.gajabmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/cropped-Elon-Musks-transgender-child-18-files-court-documents-to-change.jpgReplies: @Not Raul, @Anonymous
Interesting that Podhead agrees with the Ku Klux Klan.
Few Americans are of all-English ancestry, but a majority have some. Genealogist and novelist Jeane Weston claimed as much as 82% of us. (Certainly virtually all native blacks and Indians will have some.)Lots of good charts and maps at that link.Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
LOL. It literally says what it is: White. It’s synonymous with European racial ancestry.
The existence of White subgroups like Anglo-Saxons doesn’t disprove the existence of the larger racial category. You and the likes of joker Ta-Nehisi Coates (“those who believe they are white”) have a weird hangup about recognizing there’s a race called Whites, aka Europeans. White, in America, is just a shorter synonym of “European-American”. Now you know what White is. You’re welcome.
Jews say they are not white. They sure look white to people who REALLY ARE not white. What Jews mean is they do not naturally belong to Europe and see its peoples their as goyim. Jews see themselves as a separate group.
https://twitter.com/breakingbaht/status/1724892505647296620Accusing Jews of pushing dialectical hatred is not neutral. It is a serious and false accusation, as is accusing the Jews of flooding the country with hordes of minorities.
Of course I see the Jews accused of these two things (and worse) on Unz every day so around here these blood libels seem commonplace and not shocking. But out in the real world these are serious, anti-Semitic accusations and Musk is (rightly) going to get punched back hard for trying to bring these fringe views out from under their rock and into mainstream discourse in America.Replies: @Cagey Beast, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Technite78, @Alec Leamas (working from home), @New Dealer, @SFG, @clifford brown, @PhysicistDave, @Alec Leamas (working from home)
The Baht guy’s a little over the top…but after years of reading this place, and looking at the NYT and WaPo, I hate to say it, but he’s right.
It’s a lot more complicated than the Anglin brigade wants to pretend–it’s not like there’s a united front from the Likud to the DSA trying to destroy white America and convince them to become gay so they don’t have kids while they breed like bunnies themselves. A lot of these types hate each other. Stephen Miller exists, even if he got insulted by his own uncle. Netanyahu’s not in cahoots with Schumer to flood America with nonwhites; Bibi probably wants a more right-wing America that will back him up. Podhoretz neocon types are much more afraid of neo-Nazis than they are genuinely hateful of whites; Commentary ran a full special issue on how bad wokeness is. The sort of Michelle Goldberg types who exult over replacement aren’t hugely into breeding themselves. The DSA types usually want to ‘decolonize’ Israel along with the rest of the Western world.
But the truth is *conservative* Jews tend to stop short of being pro-White, if only because pro-White types really, really don’t like Jews (look at the remainder of this site). The best you get is an Edward Blum type who knocks down discrimination against everyone (for this regard much thanks), or Breitbart types who like Trump and want the USA to stay the USA; if not explicitly white, they have some appreciation for either classical Western culture or the American cowboy variety. They tended to be pretty pro-immigration (look at Commentary), though I do get the sense this is changing. Maybe there’s hope?
*Liberal and libertarian* Jews are, well, liberals (modern or classical), and even if they’re against cancel culture tend to be pro-immigration–look at Bryan ‘Open Borders’ Caplan or Matt ‘One Billion Americans’ Yglesias. (Can you think of anything more horrifying?) You can find guys like Yascha Mounk and Stephen Pinker who realize identity politics is horrible for them (and for the country), but they’re all for LGBTQED, and have 1d2-1 kids (not that I’m in any position to criticize) unless they’re super rich.
As for *leftists*, well, everything is part of white supremacy, which must be torn down, to allow us to create The Great Socialist State (That Has Never Been *Tried*!) They want to wreck Israel too, but that’s cold comfort. Their being Jewish is kind of peripheral at this point, except in the historical sense. They’re leftists, what else is there to say? I have to admit some things like a national healthcare system like, oh, *every other rich country in the world* might not be so bad, but the doofuses want to turn this country into the USSR. Or China, before it became capitalist and stopped running up death tolls that put Stalin to shame. Or CHAZ/CHOP. We need to defund the cops, unless they’re putting people in jail for being racist!
Technically I should differentiate between anarchists and communists, but they’re both open-borders, so who cares?
Oh, and if anyone tries to tell you the Great Replacement is fake, remind them it was actually in a book called ‘The Emerging Democratic Majority’, written by a pair of Democratic consultants (one of whom has gone apostate–not the Jewish one, of course).
Now excuse me while I go puke.
Right, I read Tablet and it is generally more relevant and contemporary. I tried reading Commentary’s takes after October 7th and it just felt dated. Like trying on your pants from high school. Tablet usually has some nuance and plays to liberals at least in theory, but it has become pretty hardcore since the Hamas attack.
John’s mother, Midge Decter, wrote Liberal Parents, Radical Children. What might Neoconservative Parents… be followed by? She was also a staunch critic of “women’s lib”.
I found the modest house she lived in in 1930, thanks to that year’s census, and checked it out. (IRL, though you can do it via Google Maps and Earth now, too.) Mr Rosenthal* had a small business in sporting goods, perhaps equipping the “Scots” of Macalester College a short walk away. There were a plethora of “white ethnic groups” around– two Catholic (and one Presbyterian!) colleges nearby, and Jews “covenanted” out of the city next door. German-Norwegian Charles M Schulz’s family barber shop was about a mile away. (Though 1930 was the one year they spent in Needles, Calif., so you won’t find them on Midge’s page.)
* Here’s a 1982 interview with him.
https://twitter.com/breakingbaht/status/1724892505647296620Accusing Jews of pushing dialectical hatred is not neutral. It is a serious and false accusation, as is accusing the Jews of flooding the country with hordes of minorities.
Of course I see the Jews accused of these two things (and worse) on Unz every day so around here these blood libels seem commonplace and not shocking. But out in the real world these are serious, anti-Semitic accusations and Musk is (rightly) going to get punched back hard for trying to bring these fringe views out from under their rock and into mainstream discourse in America.Replies: @Cagey Beast, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Technite78, @Alec Leamas (working from home), @New Dealer, @SFG, @clifford brown, @PhysicistDave, @Alec Leamas (working from home)
Separate from the Musk quote, I do not think the commercial is effective propaganda. The target and protagonist is The Boomer in the Pick-up Truck, not the son. Boomers in Pick-up Trucks already support Israel. How to reach the younger generation is the conundrum that needs to be addressed. The recent ADL audio leak reflects this.
How is this not an indictment of Greenblatt and how he has run the ADL?
Jews are white, but they are not White, and that is incredibly important to understand.
“white” a person of light skin colour, who is non-Asian.
White, a non-Jewish person of European descent without large or obvious non-White &/or Jewish admixture.
Jews and Whites have different cultures, ancestries, histories, genetics, orientations and phenotypical traits, i.e. they are different people.
So lumping in Jews with Whites, is always an error, and usually occurs only when an anti-White outcome can be delivered. E.g. *Actual* Whites can be a tiny proportion of an Ivy league university with a Jewish administrator, well below their share of high performing students, but with Jews included as “white” that can make it appear that Whites are not underrepresented at all, when they are.
The genetic data show a large European, probably Italian, background.
Yiddish is a dialect of German.
Their culture is as European as Russian or Romanian or Bulgarian. Yeah, not quite English or French, but European.
The Leftist protesters are correct in labeling Zionism as the last gasp of European colonialism.
Mizrahim, on the other hand, are certainly not Europeans. The Jews are not "one people," any more than Christians from Sweden and Ethiopia or Buddhists from Sri Lanka and Japan constitute "one people."
It's all a con game by the Ashkenazim: before the October 7 attacks, the conflict between Mizrahim and Ashkenazim was tearing Israel apart. Hamas put a pause to that.
Arabs are not very smart.Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Anonymous
Because if a person is of significant Jewish ancestry, she is white if she looks "white" & is culturally European, meaning not having an emotional connection with Jewish historical culture and identity. If, on the other hand, such a person has primarily non-European identity, then we have Jews (or some other historical-cultural non-Europeans).
Phenotypically, European Jews are less a "breed" than, say, Slovaks or Swedes- Slavic and Germanic ethnicities having a more uniform generic look.
So, in this case, it is more about culture & personal identity.
Muslims think it’s theirs, because they once ruled it, and according to Allah, anything they once ruled is always theirs.
Replies: @John Pepple
Literally the first international war fought by the United States was against Spain’s long-term enemies, the Barbery states.
https://www.city-journal.org/article/jefferson-versus-the-muslim-pirates
I replied to Jack D about 10 hours ago, but I didn't get past the bouncer. Can someone who has an X account talk to Elon and see if he can negotiate with the ADL to let me through?
How is this not an indictment of Greenblatt and how he has run the ADL?
https://twitter.com/snarwani/status/1725138601996853424Replies: @Anonymous
Needs to be addressed?
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1724908287471272299
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1724934935943979269
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1724896736412660188
I recited some odious positions of the ADL to you recently and you rightly replied that not all Jews agree with ADL. Just as I do not have the same views as George W Bush. I respect that position. But now we're back to the tired old emotional reaction that any negative remark about a Jewish organization is antisemitic! I hope you retract with the honorable excuse of being too hurried to understand the whole context.
Ben Shapiro said Musk’s criticisms of ADL are apt. Is Ben Shapiro antisemitic now?
https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1725224334070071524
https://twitter.com/stevenmackeyman/status/1724994565294432316
He is deeply offended by racism of any kind.
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1724933980276084909
He seems to be on the verge of banning demands for decolonization, deeming them genocidal against Jews (and any other population the demand can be aimed at).
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1724936047489167852
ADL thanked him! https://twitter.com/JGreenblattADL/status/1725652667119092100
Finally, https://twitter.com/stclairashley/status/1725592241459138686
Addendum: he engages in multiple political topics, not just the ADL. see my https://www.unz.com/isteve/hispanic-paradox-why-do-mestizos-live-so-long/#comment-6265344Replies: @Pixo, @Rick P
Elon’s off-leash frolic lasted like 1.5 days. Back to Zion’s warm cozy embrace.
Buzz Mohawk wrote to Jack D:
It is worth reading this interview from a few days ago (see here) with one of the leaders of the “settlement” movement on the West Bank, from The New Yorker of all places!
These are not nice people.
And see here for a compilation of what Israelis are saying right now supprting genocide of the Palestinians: “Amalek,” for those unfamiliar with Jewish culture, is one of the many, many examples of genocide praised in the Hebrew Bible — see 1 Samuel 15:
And now Bibi is open that this is what he has planned for the innocents among the Palestinians.
And, no, not all Israelis and not all Jews feel this way: note that the video compilation comes from a Jewish woman, “Katie Halper A Jew For #CeasefireNow.” There really are decent Jews and Israelis.
But a lot of them aren’t.
So, will Jack D repudiate what Bibi said?
Isabella of Spain by William Thomas Walsh (London: Sheed & Ward, 1935):
Wherever they went, the Jews threw open to them the gates of the principal cities, so that in an incredibly short time the Africans were masters of all Spain save the little kingdom of the Asturias in the northern mountains, where the Christian survivors who were unwilling to accept Islam reassembled and prepared to win back their heritage… (p.17)
Everywhere the Spanish Jews opened the gates of cities to the conquerors, and the Moslems rewarded them by turning over to them the government of Granada, Seville and Cordoba. “Without any love for the soil where they lived, without any of those affections that ennoble a people, and finally without sentiments of generosity,” says Amador de los Rios, “they aspired only to feed their avarice and to accomplish the ruin of the Goths; taking the opportunity to manifest their rancour, and boasting of the hatreds that they had hoarded up so many centuries.”
…In the new Moslem state the Jews found themselves highly esteemed. It was under the caliphs that they attained the height of their prosperity… (p. 259)
https://twitter.com/breakingbaht/status/1724892505647296620Accusing Jews of pushing dialectical hatred is not neutral. It is a serious and false accusation, as is accusing the Jews of flooding the country with hordes of minorities.
Of course I see the Jews accused of these two things (and worse) on Unz every day so around here these blood libels seem commonplace and not shocking. But out in the real world these are serious, anti-Semitic accusations and Musk is (rightly) going to get punched back hard for trying to bring these fringe views out from under their rock and into mainstream discourse in America.Replies: @Cagey Beast, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Technite78, @Alec Leamas (working from home), @New Dealer, @SFG, @clifford brown, @PhysicistDave, @Alec Leamas (working from home)
Jack D wrote to Hypnotoad666:
Why on earth do we have a special word — anti-Semitic — for speech that criticizes Jews but not for speech that criticizes any other group of people at all?
No special term for criticism of Russians or Chinese or Arabs (who actually are Semites, unlike most Jews!) or, for that matter, Germans or French or Englishmen.
Why?
Jack, a while back I pointed out some of the really nasty aspects of Judaism — e.g., the slaughter of the three thousand in Exodus 32 because they held the wrong religious views or YHWH’s command for genocide against Amalek (1 Samuel 15) — and you just went ballistic.
Why?
I’ve said many critical things about Christians, Ukrainians, Koreans, etc., all of which is permitted.
But not, it seems, the Jews.
Why?
Again: I have said many, many times that of course there are many decent, ethical Jews as well as many slimy contemptible Jews, just as the same can be said for Poles and Brazilians and any other ethnic group.
But offer a factually true criticism of (some) Jews or (some aspects of) Judaism, and that is “anti-Semitic.”
Why?
Tell us why, Jack.
At the time of writing genocide was not considered morally wrong, and it was somewhat equivalent to the myths about King Arthur and Robin Hood which boosted the morale of medieval Brits living through the Black Death and hoping to see a Merrie England again.
Unfortunately what the Jews never planned for was that these national foundation myths would be incorporated into the Christian Bible and spread across the world by missionaries who claimed that every word of the Bible was true.
Talk about being hoist by your own petard.Replies: @PhysicistDave, @YetAnotherAnon
The people who made the commercial need to reach the younger generation not the older generation. The commercial does not do that task. I am not sure they can pull it off. I am not saying this is my task or your task. As propaganda, I think this commercial fails.
https://en.gajabmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/cropped-Elon-Musks-transgender-child-18-files-court-documents-to-change.jpgReplies: @Not Raul, @Anonymous
What does the poor woman have to do with Zion?
https://people.com/parents/everything-to-know-about-elon-musks-family-kids/
"white" a person of light skin colour, who is non-Asian.
White, a non-Jewish person of European descent without large or obvious non-White &/or Jewish admixture.
Jews and Whites have different cultures, ancestries, histories, genetics, orientations and phenotypical traits, i.e. they are different people.
So lumping in Jews with Whites, is always an error, and usually occurs only when an anti-White outcome can be delivered. E.g. *Actual* Whites can be a tiny proportion of an Ivy league university with a Jewish administrator, well below their share of high performing students, but with Jews included as "white" that can make it appear that Whites are not underrepresented at all, when they are.Replies: @PhysicistDave, @SFG, @Bardon Kaldian
LGTH wrote:
Ashkenazi Jews are Europeans.
The genetic data show a large European, probably Italian, background.
Yiddish is a dialect of German.
Their culture is as European as Russian or Romanian or Bulgarian. Yeah, not quite English or French, but European.
The Leftist protesters are correct in labeling Zionism as the last gasp of European colonialism.
Mizrahim, on the other hand, are certainly not Europeans. The Jews are not “one people,” any more than Christians from Sweden and Ethiopia or Buddhists from Sri Lanka and Japan constitute “one people.”
It’s all a con game by the Ashkenazim: before the October 7 attacks, the conflict between Mizrahim and Ashkenazim was tearing Israel apart. Hamas put a pause to that.
Arabs are not very smart.
“Europeans”:
https://image.pbs.org/video-assets/cxQLgXB-asset-mezzanine-16x9-R6TlJe6.jpg
https://cdn.theatlantic.com/thumbor/d5_F0LDlebmEP7NtEui4qkOA_ys=/0x259:3236x2079/960x540/media/img/mt/2018/12/AP_18300046311571/original.jpgReplies: @YetAnotherAnon, @PhysicistDave
But what does language have to do with it anyway? Are black Americans white? Are Hungarians not?Yes, there's internal tension, but it was hardly about to tear Israel apart, and none of it was ever going to help the Palestinians any.
Arabs might not be very smart, or able to stop acting in ways that are almost unbelievably pointless and self-destructive, but even they know better than to expect some kind of win just from waiting for Israel to tear itself apart somehow.
And whether Jews are one people or not, keeping Israel strong is no less in the Mizrahim's interest than it is the Ashkenazim's, so who really cares whether it's a con? If it is, it's a mutually beneficial one for all Israeli Jews, and no amount of outsider online pointing and sputtering of the kind seen over the past month will ever change that.Replies: @PhysicistDave
https://www.city-journal.org/article/jefferson-versus-the-muslim-piratesReplies: @Dmon
Yeah, but unfortunately, the carrier was back at Norfolk in drydock, so they had to send Stephen Decatur and a couple dozen marines to do the job. They got the ships seaworthy by 1898, but evidently Dewey screwed up and didn’t realize that the perpetual standing mission of the US Navy was to act as an enforcer for Spain (Israel was only a gleam in Theodore Herzl’s eye at the time), so he sunk the Spanish ships instead.
I replied to Jack D about 10 hours ago, but I didn’t get past the bouncer. Can someone who has an X account talk to Elon and see if he can negotiate with the ADL to let me through?
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1724908287471272299
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1724934935943979269
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1724896736412660188
I recited some odious positions of the ADL to you recently and you rightly replied that not all Jews agree with ADL. Just as I do not have the same views as George W Bush. I respect that position. But now we're back to the tired old emotional reaction that any negative remark about a Jewish organization is antisemitic! I hope you retract with the honorable excuse of being too hurried to understand the whole context.
Ben Shapiro said Musk’s criticisms of ADL are apt. Is Ben Shapiro antisemitic now?
https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1725224334070071524
https://twitter.com/stevenmackeyman/status/1724994565294432316
He is deeply offended by racism of any kind.
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1724933980276084909
He seems to be on the verge of banning demands for decolonization, deeming them genocidal against Jews (and any other population the demand can be aimed at).
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1724936047489167852
ADL thanked him! https://twitter.com/JGreenblattADL/status/1725652667119092100
Finally, https://twitter.com/stclairashley/status/1725592241459138686
Addendum: he engages in multiple political topics, not just the ADL. see my https://www.unz.com/isteve/hispanic-paradox-why-do-mestizos-live-so-long/#comment-6265344Replies: @Pixo, @Rick P
I can’t imagine anyone can have much of a problem with what Ben says here.
Whether Jews are white or not, the issue is that most of those marching to “free Palestine” are doing so largely to oppose “colonization” by white people. And there is little doubt that the vast majority are anti-white in general, even when Jews are not specifically the issue.
Right. I don’t see much on the left of specifically anti-Semitic rather than anti-white attitudes.
Note that "anti-Semitic" is poorly defined and always overbroad so as to include within it even anodyne, neutral observations about Jews. Related to this is a parallax in which Jews can celebrate the fruits of their power, such as claiming in triumph to have been the prime movers for the legal recognition of "gay marriage," while a non-Jew's less than celebratory view of Jews' cultural and legal activism to force "gay marriage" is "an anti-Semitic trope."
Note that “anti-white” is poorly defined and always overbroad so as to include within it even anodyne, neutral observations by the majority white community. The Coalition of the Right Fringe that YOU belong to—Alt Right, Alt Lite, Neo Nazi, white nationalist—have competing views. Is it “anti-white” for a white man to marry an Asian woman? Is it “anti-white” for a white couple who sells their house to a black family in an all-white neighborhood? And then you have the Milo’s and Jack Donovan’s of the world—gay men—who claim to be part of the Alt Right movement. Are not their lifestyle choices “anti-white”?
Perhaps you ought to carefully ponder these important questions.
These are not nice people.
And see here for a compilation of what Israelis are saying right now supprting genocide of the Palestinians: "Amalek," for those unfamiliar with Jewish culture, is one of the many, many examples of genocide praised in the Hebrew Bible -- see 1 Samuel 15:And now Bibi is open that this is what he has planned for the innocents among the Palestinians.
And, no, not all Israelis and not all Jews feel this way: note that the video compilation comes from a Jewish woman, "Katie Halper A Jew For #CeasefireNow." There really are decent Jews and Israelis.
But a lot of them aren't.
So, will Jack D repudiate what Bibi said?Replies: @clifford brown
Thanks for this. I have known Katie Halper for years through my anti-war activities in New York. I have harbored minor reservations over time if she might be controlled opposition. She has really impressed me over the Gaza issue. I obviously disagree with her on likely most issues, but she has always been a stand up person when it comes to militarism. Very impressed by her continued commitment and she has a wonderful sense of humor and always struck me as good natured.
It really is fair to say that ‘antisemitic’ has come to mean ‘hostile to Israel.’ It can also still be used in its original sense, of course.
What a fundamentally ridiculous age we’ve got on our hands.
The genetic data show a large European, probably Italian, background.
Yiddish is a dialect of German.
Their culture is as European as Russian or Romanian or Bulgarian. Yeah, not quite English or French, but European.
The Leftist protesters are correct in labeling Zionism as the last gasp of European colonialism.
Mizrahim, on the other hand, are certainly not Europeans. The Jews are not "one people," any more than Christians from Sweden and Ethiopia or Buddhists from Sri Lanka and Japan constitute "one people."
It's all a con game by the Ashkenazim: before the October 7 attacks, the conflict between Mizrahim and Ashkenazim was tearing Israel apart. Hamas put a pause to that.
Arabs are not very smart.Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Anonymous
Same as Henry Louis Gates and Barack Obama are Europeans?
“Europeans”:
They even look European.
Neither is true for African-Americans.
You may dislike Ashkenazi Jews, but they were as European as Ukrainians or Bulgarians.Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
And died in World War II, his plane probably shot down by the Luftwaffe .Replies: @Anonymous, @Steve Sailer
Right, the Brits were probably using the great actor Leslie Howard as a diplomat. He was likely visiting Iberia in 1943 on behalf of His Majesty’s Government, when he was shot down by the Nazis
Israel has already suffered a strategic defeat, possibly catastrophic, at the hands of the Palestinian resistance. I doubt another (D) candidate can run on the Israel slave platform. It torpedoed any chance for the Big Guy and the (R) party is under pressure from their own far right flank. American support for Israel is now a coin flip at the executive (IE the only relevant) level. Much to be learned from this war, although it’s a very old lesson, written in blood…
“We often give the enemy the means of our own destruction” — Aesop
The genetic data show a large European, probably Italian, background.
Yiddish is a dialect of German.
Their culture is as European as Russian or Romanian or Bulgarian. Yeah, not quite English or French, but European.
The Leftist protesters are correct in labeling Zionism as the last gasp of European colonialism.
Mizrahim, on the other hand, are certainly not Europeans. The Jews are not "one people," any more than Christians from Sweden and Ethiopia or Buddhists from Sri Lanka and Japan constitute "one people."
It's all a con game by the Ashkenazim: before the October 7 attacks, the conflict between Mizrahim and Ashkenazim was tearing Israel apart. Hamas put a pause to that.
Arabs are not very smart.Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Anonymous
Not saying Jews aren’t white, but going by your lax criteria, plenty of Gypsies would qualify as well. Some groups are majority white in ancestry these days, and plenty of them don’t speak their original languages anymore.
But what does language have to do with it anyway? Are black Americans white? Are Hungarians not?
Yes, there’s internal tension, but it was hardly about to tear Israel apart, and none of it was ever going to help the Palestinians any.
Arabs might not be very smart, or able to stop acting in ways that are almost unbelievably pointless and self-destructive, but even they know better than to expect some kind of win just from waiting for Israel to tear itself apart somehow.
And whether Jews are one people or not, keeping Israel strong is no less in the Mizrahim’s interest than it is the Ashkenazim’s, so who really cares whether it’s a con? If it is, it’s a mutually beneficial one for all Israeli Jews, and no amount of outsider online pointing and sputtering of the kind seen over the past month will ever change that.
We could argue about whether language is more important than DNA or whether residence for over a thousand years trumps culture. but all of it points to Ashkenazim being Europeans.
And, yes, a case could be made that they are more European than Hungarians: I had a classmate in high school who was of Hungarian descent -- looked a bit central Asian, perhaps because of the origins of the Magyars.
But of course it would be perverse to claim that the Hungarians nowadays are not Europeans. And it is equally perverse to deny that Ashkenazim were.
Such things are indeed a bit fuzzy around the edges, but that is not the case for either Hungarians or Ashkenazim. Europeans all.Replies: @res
That pic came up for Elon’s michling IVF-twins-mama, but I think that might be the wrong one due to a NY Post mislabel. Pics of most of them here:
https://people.com/parents/everything-to-know-about-elon-musks-family-kids/
https://en.gajabmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/cropped-Elon-Musks-transgender-child-18-files-court-documents-to-change.jpgReplies: @Not Raul, @Anonymous
Did Musk walk back his comments?
From reading his biography,
Musk saved Tesla and SpaceX from the brink of disaster. This latest little drama with Twitter (X) has to be familiar territory for him. He can’t stand still. He moves on to the next drama with unshakeable ideas in his Aspergery head.
He is often unpleasant for partners, in both romance and business, to be involved with, but he keeps on going and winning.
He sets crazy goals, fires people along the way, and miraculously reaches those goals. His plans for X involve much more than the twitverse. If it survives this Jewish attack, it may surprise you with what it becomes…
https://twitter.com/SpaceXReplies: @Anonymous
Ford also had an anti-Semitism problem, even more so than Musk. Musk only said a few words but Ford wrote volumes. Like Musk is about to find out, being a racist or an anti-Semite in America is really bad for business. Ford eventually dropped the Dearborn Independent like a hot potato. But not before causing a lot of damage (Ford's business survived the damage but the Jews of Europe did not). Hitler viewed Ford as an inspiration and Ford can be seen as one of the men whose action lead directly to the Holocaust.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/11/henry-ford-anti-semitism/675911/
Viewed in this context, (again) allowing anti-Semitism to enter mainstream respectability is literally a matter of life and death for the Jews. This is what the Men of Unz don't get. Antisemitism isn't a matter of being allowed to join certain country clubs or the free expression of opinion.
Rather it is this: once you accept the premise that the Jews are undermining and destroying your country, it's a logical conclusion that you should kill them all, every last one of them, like Hamas. The old and the young. Robert Bowers (the Pittsburgh synagogue shooter) was not insane. If he was correct in his beliefs that Jew want "to bring invaders in that kill our people" then he was right to kill 97 year old Rose Mallinger and 10 other elderly Jews.
This is why it's not OK for opinions like those held by Bowers cannot be given mainstream respectability. Musk can have whatever outspoken opinions he wants, but no one is obligated to advertise on his platform as he is about to find out.Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality, @Anonymous, @YetAnotherAnon, @Travis, @Anon, @Thea, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Buzz Mohawk, @Buzz Mohawk
That is unfortunate, isn’t it? Jews need more criticism. Criticism is healthy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GeixtYS-P3s
Wallace demurred and said "Well, I'm Jewish."
I was more innocent then - I was shocked. It's like all of the Jewish people I knew (and I know many) have been hiding out.Replies: @American Citizen, @Mr. Anon, @Prester John
No Black ever called me “Goy”.
He wasn’t doing that. He was pointing out that a lot of the political community in that population strip up hatred against Whites.
It’s painful and they should stop. What we need are strong voices in the Jewish community to condemn the ADL, the SPLC and many others for their anti-Whitism. In the long run that is the path to living peacefully.
They’re very much like the historical English ruling class: often just acting really sh**ty, but getting away with it and gaslighting everyone because they hold the megaphone.
==
They're not 'constantly at war' nor are they 'evil' to anyone without a poisonous imagination. Israel hasn't been in a shooting war with an Arab state since 1973, bar a scatter dogfights with the Syrian air force and a couple of raids on distant points. Other than signing on to the Suez campaign in 1956-57, none of Israel's wars with Arab states were voluntary.
==
Israel's enemies have been paramilitary forces - Al Fatah, Hamas, the Hezbollah, miscellaneous minor allies of Al Fatah, miscellaneous Lebanese outfits. All of these have been financed by Arab governments, by Iran, and by other parties. The Arab governments also buffalo'd the Lebanese government in 1967 into harboring the P.L.O. wings. NB, prudent Arab governments don't want these characters around, either. The Jordanian government expelled Al Fatah, et al from its territory in 1970. It allowed some to return in 1982, but confiscated their weapons on arrival. Egypt places strict controls on movement across the Gaza-Egyptian border for a reason.
==
Again, for the 1,000th time, the Arab bosses on the West Bank and Gaza have on five different occasions since 1971 been offered different situations than the one they have now. They spurned all the offers. What they have is for what they've opted.Replies: @Mr. Anon
Sure, Jack, Sure.
It’s interesting how much of the everything in this world is basically just BS.
Almost every Jew, Gypsy, Negro, and Homosexual who died in the holocaust would by now be dead anyway of old age.
https://www.thejc.com/news/news/once-banned-from-politics-jews-went-on-to-help-forge-the-britain-we-know-today-2NN9nuOCvvrkFO6AljtInt
as late as 1966, there were 38 Jewish Labor MP ‘s~ 12% of the Parliamentary party whereas only a few Jewish Tory MPs eg Keith Joseph
But Jews are flexible strategists and moved right as sociialims was no more working in UK than in USSR. Plus Tories rated doughty as useful in Cold War 1. By Thatcher era , the ratios had flipped.
After the war, the association between the Tory Party and prewar appeasement, indifference verging on hostility to the birth of the state of Israel, and occasional manifestations of anti-Semitism among its grassroots membership meant that many Jews continued to shun it. There were only two Jews on the Tory benches in the House of Commons in the 25 years between 1945 and 1970—as against, at its peak, 38 Jewish Labour MPs in 1966. During the 1970s, this began to shift: Further demographic changes within the Jewish community, Labour’s drift toward anti-Zionism, and the more meritocratic bent of the Conservative Party, begun under Prime Minister Ted Heath (1970–74) and accelerated by Thatcher, dramatically increased the number of Jews voting Tory and sitting on the party’s benches in parliament.
https://www.commentary.org/articles/robert-philpot/thatchers-jewish-brain-trust/
Wherever they went, the Jews threw open to them the gates of the principal cities, so that in an incredibly short time the Africans were masters of all Spain save the little kingdom of the Asturias in the northern mountains, where the Christian survivors who were unwilling to accept Islam reassembled and prepared to win back their heritage… (p.17)
Everywhere the Spanish Jews opened the gates of cities to the conquerors, and the Moslems rewarded them by turning over to them the government of Granada, Seville and Cordoba. “Without any love for the soil where they lived, without any of those affections that ennoble a people, and finally without sentiments of generosity,” says Amador de los Rios, “they aspired only to feed their avarice and to accomplish the ruin of the Goths; taking the opportunity to manifest their rancour, and boasting of the hatreds that they had hoarded up so many centuries.”
…In the new Moslem state the Jews found themselves highly esteemed. It was under the caliphs that they attained the height of their prosperity… (p. 259)Replies: @Jack D
Walsh was a classical pre-Vatican II Catholic anti-Semite.
In the Dublin Review he wrote about the Jews that, “all their miseries, for which I could weep, are not the result, fundamentally, of the hatred and misunderstanding of others, but the consequence of their own stubborn rejection of Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ who predicted in unmistakable language exactly what has befallen them”. In Characters of the Inquisition he wrote, “Finally, let us be realistic about the matter – there is a quality in the Jews which does not exist in any other race…is it not possible, is it not indeed obvious, that the elusive difference is spiritual?…how could such a people, cast off once more by a just God whose divine Majesty they had affronted, fail to experience an inner dislocation of the spirit, which, as the core and animating principle of their whole being, must inevitably extend disharmony, discontent, and futility to their outward acts, bodily and mental?”
(From his wiki)
It’s hilarious that the Men of Unz are constantly citing these ancient anti-Semites because no one respectable has written garbage like this for 70 or 80 years now.
2. Your people made darned sure to make these once very common Christian views unwelcome in society, haven’t you?
3. Aren’t you tired of all this supposed anti-Semitism from us goyim? You’ve been vociferously defending Israel’s actions these few weeks like it’s your true country. Why don’t you make Aliyah so that you can be free of of all this goyisch prejudice and actually defend your country while at it? Put some skin in the game, so to speak.Replies: @Jack D
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn won the Nobel Prize in literature, yet in later years couldn't get English translations of his books published. You'd think someone in America would publish a Nobel Prize winner, but..............nope, nada, bupkis.Replies: @Art Deco
...and why shouldn't it be true? Can you explain why the Jews of Spain would have felt any especial loyalty to the Visigothic kingdom, or preferred its rule to that of the Muslims?
Let's face at least one fact: through at least about 1700, Jews were generally on Team Islam, not that of the Christians. This isn't bad or good; it's just the way it was.Replies: @mc23
Almost all Jews in the US are quite obviously white by any reasonable standard.
That a leftist who claims otherwise isn’t mocked as an absolute buffoon simply reveals the utter cowardice of most.
And when “based far rightists” embrace the most idiotic leftist ideas…
…actually some people can’t draw conclusions so I am insinuating that they should be mocked as the ridiculous tools that they actually are.
No special term for criticism of Russians or Chinese or Arabs (who actually are Semites, unlike most Jews!) or, for that matter, Germans or French or Englishmen.
Why?
Jack, a while back I pointed out some of the really nasty aspects of Judaism -- e.g., the slaughter of the three thousand in Exodus 32 because they held the wrong religious views or YHWH's command for genocide against Amalek (1 Samuel 15) -- and you just went ballistic.
Why?
I've said many critical things about Christians, Ukrainians, Koreans, etc., all of which is permitted.
But not, it seems, the Jews.
Why?
Again: I have said many, many times that of course there are many decent, ethical Jews as well as many slimy contemptible Jews, just as the same can be said for Poles and Brazilians and any other ethnic group.
But offer a factually true criticism of (some) Jews or (some aspects of) Judaism, and that is "anti-Semitic."
Why?
Tell us why, Jack.Replies: @Jonathan Mason, @Hibernian
Yes, the Bible holds up genocide as a best practice for enforcing the promise of land by a deity but this is very unfortunate, because the view of most historians is that the events depicted in Exodus and Joshua never happened and were invented as mythical fiction somewhere around the reign of King Hezekiah to boost the religion and morale of the people at that time.
At the time of writing genocide was not considered morally wrong, and it was somewhat equivalent to the myths about King Arthur and Robin Hood which boosted the morale of medieval Brits living through the Black Death and hoping to see a Merrie England again.
Unfortunately what the Jews never planned for was that these national foundation myths would be incorporated into the Christian Bible and spread across the world by missionaries who claimed that every word of the Bible was true.
Talk about being hoist by your own petard.
Blue eyes = white in my book.Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Graham, @Jay Fink, @anon
True that. I have a Jewish sounding surname but am not actually Jewish; when I once arrived in Israel on business the man who came to pick me up at Ben Gurion Airport, who was holding up a sign with my name on, took one look at me and said, “But you’re not Jewish!” The only visible evidence of that, since I was fully clothed, was my blue eyes.
Dude, you’re becoming the Jewish version of the Unz commenter Truth.
Musk saved Tesla and SpaceX from the brink of disaster. This latest little drama with Twitter (X) has to be familiar territory for him. He can't stand still. He moves on to the next drama with unshakeable ideas in his Aspergery head.
He is often unpleasant for partners, in both romance and business, to be involved with, but he keeps on going and winning.
He sets crazy goals, fires people along the way, and miraculously reaches those goals. His plans for X involve much more than the twitverse. If it survives this Jewish attack, it may surprise you with what it becomes...Replies: @Buzz Mohawk, @Jack D
Today is the second test of SpaceX’s very large rocket…
Tweets by SpaceX
"white" a person of light skin colour, who is non-Asian.
White, a non-Jewish person of European descent without large or obvious non-White &/or Jewish admixture.
Jews and Whites have different cultures, ancestries, histories, genetics, orientations and phenotypical traits, i.e. they are different people.
So lumping in Jews with Whites, is always an error, and usually occurs only when an anti-White outcome can be delivered. E.g. *Actual* Whites can be a tiny proportion of an Ivy league university with a Jewish administrator, well below their share of high performing students, but with Jews included as "white" that can make it appear that Whites are not underrepresented at all, when they are.Replies: @PhysicistDave, @SFG, @Bardon Kaldian
I’d say the difference is mostly political. Nobody would get this worked up over the whiteness of Turks, because they haven’t been hugely influential in every left-wing movement in two hundred years.
Eye-ties aren’t white silly.
I hope I don't see anymore of this kind of scribbling around here from now on.Replies: @Twinkie
Half of my ancestors came from southern Italy. We often joked about “the white people” out in the suburbs, with their bizarre customs and uptight WASPy ways. Supposedly the term “spic” came from us, coz when the white folks wanted our people to do something they didn’t want to do they replied, ay, no spick-a da english.
My grandmother spoke of an incident when the rich white ladies came from the settlement house to see how the rabble lived, and were surprised that they were so civilized that they had real curtains in their windows. Remembering her Caesar, she quipped that while their ancestors had been painting themselves blue and living in caves, ours were busy conquering the world.
In 1923-24, back in the good old days of eugenics, Congress passed laws excluding the importation of members of inferior races (primarily Asians) which included strict quotas on the number of southern European subhumans. Gotta preserve the purity of the good old white race after all – fooled them, though, didn’t we. Along with the Irish, we turned their brave republic into the sewer of corruption and self-interest that passes for normal now.
That is the fly in the ointment of the Jewish slave trader narrative. Even if Jews ran the slave trade (they didn't) today's Jews are as responsible for what they did as white Americans are responsible for Pizzaro.Replies: @Dmon, @James J. O'Meara, @Pop Warner, @Corpse Tooth, @Bill P, @mc23, @Buzz Mohawk, @Pastit, @Stan Adams, @Wj
Just stop please. Jews are white, jews are black and even Asian. Jew is not a race no matter how much they want to flight from white.
Before that, there was just race, birthplace, and parents' birthplaces to go by. Jews would have been " Russian", "Polish", " Austrian", "Roumanian", or what have you. They could have used "Ashkenazi", " Sephardi", etc as an ethnic marker-- e.g., Catholic Bernard Nathanson and Episcopalian Lawrence Auster, yes, Jews Sammy Davis Jr and Robert Putnam and Jewesses Ivanka Trump and Sara Blakely, no.Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
That’s OK, but let’s not mix these things.
Nathanson & Auster (who, by the way, became Catholic, too) were ethnically Jewish. But here- things become complicated.
I think we can accept “Jewish” as an ethnicity, meaning some kind of proto-national, ethnic identity. Race, as is the case with Sammy Davis jr., is another thing. This is race, not an ethnicity.
Ivanka Trump’s ethnicity is not clear. It is not Jewish; but it is not “white” either, because “white” is a race. She, I think, could check Czech, German & Scottish for ethnicity.
Confucian rectification of names- words should correspond to reality.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GeixtYS-P3s
Wallace demurred and said "Well, I'm Jewish."
I was more innocent then - I was shocked. It's like all of the Jewish people I knew (and I know many) have been hiding out.Replies: @American Citizen, @Mr. Anon, @Prester John
Kudos to Freeman; shame on Wallace.
There appear to be three corners of the American left with specifically anti-Semitic views: 1) NOI and affiliated groups; 2) American orthodox Muslims from MENA and the Subcontinent; 3) a smattering of quite peculiar Jewish intellectuals who have gone so far as to recognize oppressive Jewish power, albeit only when manifested against brown people (i.e. Norman Finkelstein).
Note that “anti-Semitic” is poorly defined and always overbroad so as to include within it even anodyne, neutral observations about Jews. Related to this is a parallax in which Jews can celebrate the fruits of their power, such as claiming in triumph to have been the prime movers for the legal recognition of “gay marriage,” while a non-Jew’s less than celebratory view of Jews’ cultural and legal activism to force “gay marriage” is “an anti-Semitic trope.”
Replies: @John Pepple
I am not Christian, so this doesn’t mean anything to me, but let me point out that I’ve heard there are people in Morocco who have keys to houses in Spain that their ancestors owned hundreds of years ago and which they hope to re-occupy someday. I’ve never heard of Christians, or anyone else, doing such a thing.
Wasn't there some people who spent two thousand years claiming Jerusalem was their home and that some day they would return?
'The next beer in Jerusalem', wasn't it? Something like that.
Using Ockham’s razor, I simply propose that for people like Podhoretz the relative disadvantages of being classified as white (losing contact to Blacks and Hispanics and losing their position in the coalition of fringes) are now bigger than the relative disadvantages of being classified as Jewish (Jews have now so much other means to avoid the reproach of “inequity”). Of course, Podhoretz might be wrong.
1. “Men of Unz”? When did you start using this Alden lingo? Have you transitioned and are you a Jewess now?
2. Your people made darned sure to make these once very common Christian views unwelcome in society, haven’t you?
3. Aren’t you tired of all this supposed anti-Semitism from us goyim? You’ve been vociferously defending Israel’s actions these few weeks like it’s your true country. Why don’t you make Aliyah so that you can be free of of all this goyisch prejudice and actually defend your country while at it? Put some skin in the game, so to speak.
That, and it was a dreadful preachy movie, right up there with To Kill a Mockingbird.
A Raisin in the Sun and Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner also blew dead dogs.
"white" a person of light skin colour, who is non-Asian.
White, a non-Jewish person of European descent without large or obvious non-White &/or Jewish admixture.
Jews and Whites have different cultures, ancestries, histories, genetics, orientations and phenotypical traits, i.e. they are different people.
So lumping in Jews with Whites, is always an error, and usually occurs only when an anti-White outcome can be delivered. E.g. *Actual* Whites can be a tiny proportion of an Ivy league university with a Jewish administrator, well below their share of high performing students, but with Jews included as "white" that can make it appear that Whites are not underrepresented at all, when they are.Replies: @PhysicistDave, @SFG, @Bardon Kaldian
I wouldn’t agree.
Because if a person is of significant Jewish ancestry, she is white if she looks “white” & is culturally European, meaning not having an emotional connection with Jewish historical culture and identity. If, on the other hand, such a person has primarily non-European identity, then we have Jews (or some other historical-cultural non-Europeans).
Phenotypically, European Jews are less a “breed” than, say, Slovaks or Swedes- Slavic and Germanic ethnicities having a more uniform generic look.
So, in this case, it is more about culture & personal identity.
“Elon has been saying some things recently that indicate he understands our problems.”
I agree. And I also believe that Trump “gets it” too. The prob that I have with both of these men is that they manifest the same (often fatal) characteristic of all politicians and wannabee politicians: they spend too much time staring at the mirror.
Musk saved Tesla and SpaceX from the brink of disaster. This latest little drama with Twitter (X) has to be familiar territory for him. He can't stand still. He moves on to the next drama with unshakeable ideas in his Aspergery head.
He is often unpleasant for partners, in both romance and business, to be involved with, but he keeps on going and winning.
He sets crazy goals, fires people along the way, and miraculously reaches those goals. His plans for X involve much more than the twitverse. If it survives this Jewish attack, it may surprise you with what it becomes...Replies: @Buzz Mohawk, @Jack D
Musk reminds me a lot of Henry Ford, who was also one of the few men to found a successful car company. To succeed greatly you also sometimes have to fail greatly. Some of Ford’s ideas were big turkeys.
Ford also had an anti-Semitism problem, even more so than Musk. Musk only said a few words but Ford wrote volumes. Like Musk is about to find out, being a racist or an anti-Semite in America is really bad for business. Ford eventually dropped the Dearborn Independent like a hot potato. But not before causing a lot of damage (Ford’s business survived the damage but the Jews of Europe did not). Hitler viewed Ford as an inspiration and Ford can be seen as one of the men whose action lead directly to the Holocaust.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/11/henry-ford-anti-semitism/675911/
Viewed in this context, (again) allowing anti-Semitism to enter mainstream respectability is literally a matter of life and death for the Jews. This is what the Men of Unz don’t get. Antisemitism isn’t a matter of being allowed to join certain country clubs or the free expression of opinion.
Rather it is this: once you accept the premise that the Jews are undermining and destroying your country, it’s a logical conclusion that you should kill them all, every last one of them, like Hamas. The old and the young. Robert Bowers (the Pittsburgh synagogue shooter) was not insane. If he was correct in his beliefs that Jew want “to bring invaders in that kill our people” then he was right to kill 97 year old Rose Mallinger and 10 other elderly Jews.
This is why it’s not OK for opinions like those held by Bowers cannot be given mainstream respectability. Musk can have whatever outspoken opinions he wants, but no one is obligated to advertise on his platform as he is about to find out.
But thanks for clarifying that the United States hasn’t had free speech in a very long time.
Why would any young white person fight to defend system that hates his guts?Replies: @Corvinus
* you'll probably find it impossible to resist, but try not to quote medieval York or Little Hugh of Lincoln at me.Replies: @Buzz Mohawk
Many people here believe that Blacks are destroying our nation, with their high rates of crime and low intelligence. Does this mean you would advocate for a final solution to the Black problem? If not, why do you constantly attack Blacks for their high criminality and lower intelligence? Is this not a call to exterminate Blacks? Since any attack on Jews may result in another holocaust , could the same logic apply to any critique of Blacks? Any attack on Blacks may result in a return of lynchings and Jim Crow laws so being critical of blacks should also result in being cancelled , black listed and shunned from society.
Thus your opinion on Blacks should not be given mainstream respectability. Since, according to your opinion, blacks should be exterminated since they cause most of the homicides.
Thanks for articulating your animating logical fallacy so clearly. That therefore this.
Kind of sad you can't see it and waste so much time.Replies: @Buzz Mohawk, @res, @Jack D
Of course, every time you use the whip, more dumb goys notice their slavery. Bit of a conundrum for the tribe. Best to hit and hit hard so you don't have to use the whip too often.
That said, you might consider the fragility of your weapons. Jews, of course, are small in number. You use your money to control politicians and the media. You also use blackmail.
In essence, you act like the mob. But your success in the West is mainly due to you having almost no competition. It wouldn't be hard for other groups to adopt your tactics. Indeed, some are.
Again, the fact that no Indians or Asians outside of Twinkie even care enough to read Steve or reply to your bizarre posts should tell you something.
Also, like any parasite, you're only a danger if your allowed to attach yourself to a host. If you think Asians don't know who runs the West and whom they should keep out, you're fooling yourself.
But don't worry Jack. Jews are still on top in the West. But the world is moving in a direction that isn't "good for the Jews."Replies: @Anon, @Twinkie
"How dare he say anything bad about my people!"
"My people will make sure he pays!"
"My people are victims who must beware...
... but somehow we have so much power and influence that we can crush anybody who dares accuse us of having power and influence!"
I'm ignorant, so I don't know where the saying comes from, but here it goes again, in my low-class, ignorant verbiage:
If you want to know who rules you, who lords over you, who fucking owns you, all you have to do is ask yourself, "Who am I not allowed to criticize?Replies: @Jack D
2. Your people made darned sure to make these once very common Christian views unwelcome in society, haven’t you?
3. Aren’t you tired of all this supposed anti-Semitism from us goyim? You’ve been vociferously defending Israel’s actions these few weeks like it’s your true country. Why don’t you make Aliyah so that you can be free of of all this goyisch prejudice and actually defend your country while at it? Put some skin in the game, so to speak.Replies: @Jack D
I am an American, just like you are. I’m sure that you would be offended if I told you to move to Korea but somehow you feel ok spouting off like an old white bigot. All I want is for America to be the America that George Washington imagined in his letter to the Jews of America, one where:
“no more that toleration is spoken of, as if it was by the indulgence of one class of people, that another enjoyed the exercise of their inherent natural rights. For happily the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens, in giving it on all occasions their effectual support.”
In other words you can be Jewish and still be an American. The people (like you) who say you can’t are the ones who are REALLY un-American. America is not like Hungary where to be fully “Hungarian” you have to be a white Catholic with a certain ancestry. Americans can be any race or religion or color.
(And notice that Washington doesn’t say anything about the Jews killing his Lord and Savior).
BTW, giving “effectual support” doesn’t mean that you have to be anti-immigration in order to be a “good citizen”. In fact, being pro-immigration is more in line with the policies of the current Government of the United States, so if anyone is not a “good citizen”, it’s the Men of Unz (sorry but I love that label).
While the idea that Americans can be “any race or religion” isn’t entirely inaccurate, up until 1965 we were about 85-90% white, and probably >90% Christian - if not Christian in actual practice then at least we were mostly descended from Christians.
Mass immigration from anywhere and everywhere is an irreversible experiment on the one and only country we have. Given the current results it doesn’t seem to be working out very well. Virtually every social metric is headed downwards, from test scores to birthrates to life expectancy to the budget deficit to the quality of politicians we elect. But we’re all expected to continue parroting the belief that “diversity” can’t be anything but a blessing, even as the establishment turns up the heat to boil the frog even faster. In Canada they are literally importing far more immigrants than they have actual births. The UK isn’t far behind, and - given the undisclosed rate of illegal immigration into the US - neither are we.Replies: @Jack D
However were you in Israel, you would no doubt be loyal to both.
We are tired of people like you defining what it is to be a "good citizen". We are tired of being told by people who barely hide their contempt for us "what America is" and "who we are".Replies: @Jack D
On that score, though, do you see me crying about "anti-Koreanism" or "anti-Asianism" among "the Men of Unz" like you do about "anti-Semitism"? (or advocating that South Korea should "periodically mow the lawn" of North Korea and kill North Korean women and children as you say about the Israelis in Gaza)? No, my preponderant sentiment toward America and Americans is one of gratitude. When there was a false hysteria about "anti-Asian hate/violence," I am the one who refuted it statistically, showing that, in actuality, Asians suffered the smallest growth in criminal victimization during the period in question. I am also not the one who belongs to the most sacralized and dominant ethnic group in the country, but constantly harps about being The Victimest People EvahTM here.Are you suggesting only "old white bigot[s]" express criticism about Jews evincing self-serving clannishness and hostility toward the majorities/host populations? Have you read the history of your people recently (or ever)? American goyish whites have been the most benevolent and philosemitic people in the history of your people, yet you just can't refrain from your reflexive anti-(goyish) whitism, can you?Your usual strawman. I am happy that Stephen Miller is a fellow American. You know, the guy who told the traitorous buffoon who showed up with his IDF uniform in Congress to take it off?
I am critical of Jews like you and wish those who are similarly ungrateful and hostile to the majority population to vote with their feet and go where they feel welcome and bask in the warmth of their own ethnocentrism - in your case, that'd be Israel. So, why don't you go where you clearly feel at home?Written like a good little Hofjude, parroting the elites. I am pretty sure that George Washington meant "effectual support" for your fellow countrymen and, indeed, the country as a whole, not the material interests of the elites in power among whom your ethnic kinsmen are preponderant.
Keep at it - you are surely winning friends and allies to your cause.
She is what they call "Református," which is what we here call Protestant.
The closest analogy would be Calvinist, at least from what I understand. Probably half the Hungarians we know, here or there, are Református, even though Catholics are the majority. Wikipedia says there are 1.6 million of them over there, second only to Catholics.
God is real,
But all of this religion stuff is human-laid bullshit, including your particular, Jewish cult and the whole tepestry of churches, synogogues, mosques and temples across Europe and around the globe -- plus all the books and lies and fables that go along with them.
Get over it.Replies: @AceDeuce
I would compare it to past situations -- but there's really nothing to compare it to. Somebody who endorsed the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, or Imperial Japan would have been relatively harmless in comparison. After all, the influence of American Jews on behalf of Israel is effective.Replies: @Art Deco, @Buroaker
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/05-06-02-0135Replies: @Jack D
Notably, those Jews were in Rhode Island likely because that colony's founder broke from Massachusetts which, common in colonial America and in the early Republic, had an established State Church.
Do you think that President Washington would have written the same thing to American Ashkenazis in the 2020s that he had written to the Sephardim of Rhode Island then?
That’s literally one of only 2 events mentioned in the entire gospel that has independent verification from a third party as having occurred as written by the evangelists. There are only 2 things that can be assumed as fact from the entire narrative due to their confirmation by unbiased sources. And that’s one of the two.
Gosh maybe they will have to wear a star of David on their clothing since most look pretty pasty white. Then everyone will know, and act accordingly. What a stupid mess they have woven in their eternal twin state desired victimhood and genocidal lust.
Ford also had an anti-Semitism problem, even more so than Musk. Musk only said a few words but Ford wrote volumes. Like Musk is about to find out, being a racist or an anti-Semite in America is really bad for business. Ford eventually dropped the Dearborn Independent like a hot potato. But not before causing a lot of damage (Ford's business survived the damage but the Jews of Europe did not). Hitler viewed Ford as an inspiration and Ford can be seen as one of the men whose action lead directly to the Holocaust.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/11/henry-ford-anti-semitism/675911/
Viewed in this context, (again) allowing anti-Semitism to enter mainstream respectability is literally a matter of life and death for the Jews. This is what the Men of Unz don't get. Antisemitism isn't a matter of being allowed to join certain country clubs or the free expression of opinion.
Rather it is this: once you accept the premise that the Jews are undermining and destroying your country, it's a logical conclusion that you should kill them all, every last one of them, like Hamas. The old and the young. Robert Bowers (the Pittsburgh synagogue shooter) was not insane. If he was correct in his beliefs that Jew want "to bring invaders in that kill our people" then he was right to kill 97 year old Rose Mallinger and 10 other elderly Jews.
This is why it's not OK for opinions like those held by Bowers cannot be given mainstream respectability. Musk can have whatever outspoken opinions he wants, but no one is obligated to advertise on his platform as he is about to find out.Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality, @Anonymous, @YetAnotherAnon, @Travis, @Anon, @Thea, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Buzz Mohawk, @Buzz Mohawk
Jack,
How did the ADL react when you told them to knock off their Anti-Whitism? I was thinking you and others could share your experiences about how you told them they don’t speak for you.
Please let us know.
Derb came up with a turn of phrase I rather enjoy “The hippo bellowings of John Podhoritz…”
The US has given $260 billion in direct aid to Israel since 1945. Lately we’ve been sending them about $4 billion/year. How much direct aid have we given to Spain?
Israel may not be a de jure member of NATO, but it might as well be, at least as far as its own defense is concerned. But of course it is not at all on the hook if some country attacks an actual NATO member.
Are they human?
WTF is wrong with Hungary? Why cite Hungary’s attitudes? Why not cite Israel’s attitudes towards who makes a genuine Israeli? Hungary won’t take in Syrian refugees, and some people got really pissed. Nevermind that Israel, right next door to Syria, didn’t take in any Syrian refugees. But let’s deflect to a country that no one almost ever thinks about.
While the idea that Americans can be “any race or religion” isn’t entirely inaccurate, up until 1965 we were about 85-90% white, and probably >90% Christian – if not Christian in actual practice then at least we were mostly descended from Christians.
Mass immigration from anywhere and everywhere is an irreversible experiment on the one and only country we have. Given the current results it doesn’t seem to be working out very well. Virtually every social metric is headed downwards, from test scores to birthrates to life expectancy to the budget deficit to the quality of politicians we elect. But we’re all expected to continue parroting the belief that “diversity” can’t be anything but a blessing, even as the establishment turns up the heat to boil the frog even faster. In Canada they are literally importing far more immigrants than they have actual births. The UK isn’t far behind, and – given the undisclosed rate of illegal immigration into the US – neither are we.
Ford also had an anti-Semitism problem, even more so than Musk. Musk only said a few words but Ford wrote volumes. Like Musk is about to find out, being a racist or an anti-Semite in America is really bad for business. Ford eventually dropped the Dearborn Independent like a hot potato. But not before causing a lot of damage (Ford's business survived the damage but the Jews of Europe did not). Hitler viewed Ford as an inspiration and Ford can be seen as one of the men whose action lead directly to the Holocaust.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/11/henry-ford-anti-semitism/675911/
Viewed in this context, (again) allowing anti-Semitism to enter mainstream respectability is literally a matter of life and death for the Jews. This is what the Men of Unz don't get. Antisemitism isn't a matter of being allowed to join certain country clubs or the free expression of opinion.
Rather it is this: once you accept the premise that the Jews are undermining and destroying your country, it's a logical conclusion that you should kill them all, every last one of them, like Hamas. The old and the young. Robert Bowers (the Pittsburgh synagogue shooter) was not insane. If he was correct in his beliefs that Jew want "to bring invaders in that kill our people" then he was right to kill 97 year old Rose Mallinger and 10 other elderly Jews.
This is why it's not OK for opinions like those held by Bowers cannot be given mainstream respectability. Musk can have whatever outspoken opinions he wants, but no one is obligated to advertise on his platform as he is about to find out.Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality, @Anonymous, @YetAnotherAnon, @Travis, @Anon, @Thea, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Buzz Mohawk, @Buzz Mohawk
It wasn’t the people who had a problem with Henry Ford speaking his mind. It was organized attack on him.
But thanks for clarifying that the United States hasn’t had free speech in a very long time.
Why would any young white person fight to defend system that hates his guts?
Of course the U.S. has free speech. It doesn’t have absolute free speech, nor speech without consequences.
“Why would any young white person fight to defend system that hates his guts?”
So if you are hated so much, and your way of life is allegedly threatened, then why aren’t you directly intervening to save you and your children?Replies: @Colin Wright
You apparently haven’t heard of Catalan separatists, or the 2017 Barcelona subway attacks.
John Podhoretz’s “Jews Are Not White” clears things up for me. Perhaps it explains how so many in news media and academia and politics could join in the anti-white crusades of the past few years and still somehow expect our sympathy for their present travails. And I do have sympathy! But they make it so hard to be their allies.
I tried replying to this 20 or so hours ago, but apparently the water pipe over Steve’s closet burst, and by the time moderating resumed, my reply came out as 278 comments of yours. Let’s try again:
So Spain is obligated by treaty to come to the defense of the US. I don’t see any mutual defense treaty with Israel.
Bottom line is this: Jews want group benefits, but not group responsibility. If you are going to qualify for special treatment exclusively on the basis of your membership in a group, then don’t be surprised when people blame you for the stuff about your group that they don’t like. It’s the flip side of affirmative action. Same with blacks. Every one of them is a victim of slavery and deserves eternal reparations, but when it comes to violent crime, then it’s only a small percentage who are to blame and it’s racist to treat them all like potential criminals.
…White Christians are being demonized and marginalized in the country we founded and built, what more punishment do you want.
https://twitter.com/SpaceXReplies: @Anonymous
In 1952 Wernher von Braun— the guy behind the Saturn V rocket to the moon— wrote a science fiction novel called Project Mars where he described a man named “Elon” who ruled over the Red Planet (aka Mars).
I don’t know if it was intentional, but the Gaza thing has really been a godsend to the neocons in terms of extricating themselves from the Ukraine without looking too much like they’d lost their mojo. Now they have an excuse. “We were totally kicking russkie ass, but we had to shift priorities to prevent another holocaust. So don’t any of you sh!thole countries get any ideas about joining BRICS”.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giles_Fraser
Fraser is the voice of The Guardianista on the BBC.
“Europeans”:
https://image.pbs.org/video-assets/cxQLgXB-asset-mezzanine-16x9-R6TlJe6.jpg
https://cdn.theatlantic.com/thumbor/d5_F0LDlebmEP7NtEui4qkOA_ys=/0x259:3236x2079/960x540/media/img/mt/2018/12/AP_18300046311571/original.jpgReplies: @YetAnotherAnon, @PhysicistDave
I’m watching Wales play Armenia at soccer, and unbelievable as it may seem, there are as many Africans (two) in the Armenian side as in the Welsh one.
While the idea that Americans can be “any race or religion” isn’t entirely inaccurate, up until 1965 we were about 85-90% white, and probably >90% Christian - if not Christian in actual practice then at least we were mostly descended from Christians.
Mass immigration from anywhere and everywhere is an irreversible experiment on the one and only country we have. Given the current results it doesn’t seem to be working out very well. Virtually every social metric is headed downwards, from test scores to birthrates to life expectancy to the budget deficit to the quality of politicians we elect. But we’re all expected to continue parroting the belief that “diversity” can’t be anything but a blessing, even as the establishment turns up the heat to boil the frog even faster. In Canada they are literally importing far more immigrants than they have actual births. The UK isn’t far behind, and - given the undisclosed rate of illegal immigration into the US - neither are we.Replies: @Jack D
The only reason the US remained 90% white is because it had mass immigration of whites like Italians and Jews in the Ellis Island period. Otherwise it would have ended up 40% black overall like Mississippi (and Mississippi would have ended up looking like Jamaica). Nevertheless, the racists of the time resisted immigration by these “inferior” people.
BTW, I'm pretty sure that descendants of most Ellis Island whites such as the Irish and the Italians now vote for the Republican Party (as a NYT article once described, "from Tammany Hall to Build the Wall"). Except one group. Can you guess which one?Replies: @mc23
==
Yes it would have, had the black population increased 5.7-fold since 1890 while the white population increased by 16% (presuming no immigration).
==
Should note that in 1930, the number of people who listed their father as having been born in one of a menu of eastern and southern European countries was about 15 million (and that includes Germanophones in the Hapsburg dominions). Those listing their father as having been born in Canada, the British Isles, Scandinavia, Germany, the Low Countries, France, and Switzerland numbered about 18 million.Replies: @mc23
Based on the Commentary 990, Podhoretz is still able to raise money from people who think its output justifies paying him over $400k. I think he will keep it going as long as he is able to. He isn’t giving up that salary for the amount of work he does.
Ford also had an anti-Semitism problem, even more so than Musk. Musk only said a few words but Ford wrote volumes. Like Musk is about to find out, being a racist or an anti-Semite in America is really bad for business. Ford eventually dropped the Dearborn Independent like a hot potato. But not before causing a lot of damage (Ford's business survived the damage but the Jews of Europe did not). Hitler viewed Ford as an inspiration and Ford can be seen as one of the men whose action lead directly to the Holocaust.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/11/henry-ford-anti-semitism/675911/
Viewed in this context, (again) allowing anti-Semitism to enter mainstream respectability is literally a matter of life and death for the Jews. This is what the Men of Unz don't get. Antisemitism isn't a matter of being allowed to join certain country clubs or the free expression of opinion.
Rather it is this: once you accept the premise that the Jews are undermining and destroying your country, it's a logical conclusion that you should kill them all, every last one of them, like Hamas. The old and the young. Robert Bowers (the Pittsburgh synagogue shooter) was not insane. If he was correct in his beliefs that Jew want "to bring invaders in that kill our people" then he was right to kill 97 year old Rose Mallinger and 10 other elderly Jews.
This is why it's not OK for opinions like those held by Bowers cannot be given mainstream respectability. Musk can have whatever outspoken opinions he wants, but no one is obligated to advertise on his platform as he is about to find out.Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality, @Anonymous, @YetAnotherAnon, @Travis, @Anon, @Thea, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Buzz Mohawk, @Buzz Mohawk
“once you accept the premise that the Jews are undermining and destroying your country, it’s a logical conclusion that you should kill them all, every last one of them”
I think you’ve put your finger on the big difference between your people and say medieval Brits or even Spaniards, who thought that Jews were dangerous but didn’t think like that, and expelled them rather than killing them all*.
What you describe is what Israel is doing to the Palestinians. It makes sense, if you have the mindset that “underminers should all be killed, even the suckling and the mother”.
* you’ll probably find it impossible to resist, but try not to quote medieval York or Little Hugh of Lincoln at me.
Jim Don Bob, you are too kind about JPod.
Less charitably, the road apple doesn’t fall far from the horse’s ass. That tends to happen among the public intellectual offspring.
Ford also had an anti-Semitism problem, even more so than Musk. Musk only said a few words but Ford wrote volumes. Like Musk is about to find out, being a racist or an anti-Semite in America is really bad for business. Ford eventually dropped the Dearborn Independent like a hot potato. But not before causing a lot of damage (Ford's business survived the damage but the Jews of Europe did not). Hitler viewed Ford as an inspiration and Ford can be seen as one of the men whose action lead directly to the Holocaust.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/11/henry-ford-anti-semitism/675911/
Viewed in this context, (again) allowing anti-Semitism to enter mainstream respectability is literally a matter of life and death for the Jews. This is what the Men of Unz don't get. Antisemitism isn't a matter of being allowed to join certain country clubs or the free expression of opinion.
Rather it is this: once you accept the premise that the Jews are undermining and destroying your country, it's a logical conclusion that you should kill them all, every last one of them, like Hamas. The old and the young. Robert Bowers (the Pittsburgh synagogue shooter) was not insane. If he was correct in his beliefs that Jew want "to bring invaders in that kill our people" then he was right to kill 97 year old Rose Mallinger and 10 other elderly Jews.
This is why it's not OK for opinions like those held by Bowers cannot be given mainstream respectability. Musk can have whatever outspoken opinions he wants, but no one is obligated to advertise on his platform as he is about to find out.Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality, @Anonymous, @YetAnotherAnon, @Travis, @Anon, @Thea, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Buzz Mohawk, @Buzz Mohawk
This is logic seems to state that any criticism of Jews is equivalent to what the National Socialists did and will result in the extermination of Jews.
Many people here believe that Blacks are destroying our nation, with their high rates of crime and low intelligence. Does this mean you would advocate for a final solution to the Black problem? If not, why do you constantly attack Blacks for their high criminality and lower intelligence? Is this not a call to exterminate Blacks? Since any attack on Jews may result in another holocaust , could the same logic apply to any critique of Blacks? Any attack on Blacks may result in a return of lynchings and Jim Crow laws so being critical of blacks should also result in being cancelled , black listed and shunned from society.
Thus your opinion on Blacks should not be given mainstream respectability. Since, according to your opinion, blacks should be exterminated since they cause most of the homicides.
Ford also had an anti-Semitism problem, even more so than Musk. Musk only said a few words but Ford wrote volumes. Like Musk is about to find out, being a racist or an anti-Semite in America is really bad for business. Ford eventually dropped the Dearborn Independent like a hot potato. But not before causing a lot of damage (Ford's business survived the damage but the Jews of Europe did not). Hitler viewed Ford as an inspiration and Ford can be seen as one of the men whose action lead directly to the Holocaust.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/11/henry-ford-anti-semitism/675911/
Viewed in this context, (again) allowing anti-Semitism to enter mainstream respectability is literally a matter of life and death for the Jews. This is what the Men of Unz don't get. Antisemitism isn't a matter of being allowed to join certain country clubs or the free expression of opinion.
Rather it is this: once you accept the premise that the Jews are undermining and destroying your country, it's a logical conclusion that you should kill them all, every last one of them, like Hamas. The old and the young. Robert Bowers (the Pittsburgh synagogue shooter) was not insane. If he was correct in his beliefs that Jew want "to bring invaders in that kill our people" then he was right to kill 97 year old Rose Mallinger and 10 other elderly Jews.
This is why it's not OK for opinions like those held by Bowers cannot be given mainstream respectability. Musk can have whatever outspoken opinions he wants, but no one is obligated to advertise on his platform as he is about to find out.Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality, @Anonymous, @YetAnotherAnon, @Travis, @Anon, @Thea, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Buzz Mohawk, @Buzz Mohawk
“once you accept the premise that the Jews are undermining and destroying your country, it’s a logical conclusion that you should kill them all, every last one of them, like Hamas”
Thanks for articulating your animating logical fallacy so clearly. That therefore this.
Kind of sad you can’t see it and waste so much time.
“Conservative “ Jews in the UK wreaked a lot of havoc. What is they are conserving? Not any traditional English ( oh, they will use the term “British”)manner of life or moral public values.
Ford also had an anti-Semitism problem, even more so than Musk. Musk only said a few words but Ford wrote volumes. Like Musk is about to find out, being a racist or an anti-Semite in America is really bad for business. Ford eventually dropped the Dearborn Independent like a hot potato. But not before causing a lot of damage (Ford's business survived the damage but the Jews of Europe did not). Hitler viewed Ford as an inspiration and Ford can be seen as one of the men whose action lead directly to the Holocaust.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/11/henry-ford-anti-semitism/675911/
Viewed in this context, (again) allowing anti-Semitism to enter mainstream respectability is literally a matter of life and death for the Jews. This is what the Men of Unz don't get. Antisemitism isn't a matter of being allowed to join certain country clubs or the free expression of opinion.
Rather it is this: once you accept the premise that the Jews are undermining and destroying your country, it's a logical conclusion that you should kill them all, every last one of them, like Hamas. The old and the young. Robert Bowers (the Pittsburgh synagogue shooter) was not insane. If he was correct in his beliefs that Jew want "to bring invaders in that kill our people" then he was right to kill 97 year old Rose Mallinger and 10 other elderly Jews.
This is why it's not OK for opinions like those held by Bowers cannot be given mainstream respectability. Musk can have whatever outspoken opinions he wants, but no one is obligated to advertise on his platform as he is about to find out.Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality, @Anonymous, @YetAnotherAnon, @Travis, @Anon, @Thea, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Buzz Mohawk, @Buzz Mohawk
You will be happy to know your people got revenge via the Ford Foundation.
Ford also had an anti-Semitism problem, even more so than Musk. Musk only said a few words but Ford wrote volumes. Like Musk is about to find out, being a racist or an anti-Semite in America is really bad for business. Ford eventually dropped the Dearborn Independent like a hot potato. But not before causing a lot of damage (Ford's business survived the damage but the Jews of Europe did not). Hitler viewed Ford as an inspiration and Ford can be seen as one of the men whose action lead directly to the Holocaust.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/11/henry-ford-anti-semitism/675911/
Viewed in this context, (again) allowing anti-Semitism to enter mainstream respectability is literally a matter of life and death for the Jews. This is what the Men of Unz don't get. Antisemitism isn't a matter of being allowed to join certain country clubs or the free expression of opinion.
Rather it is this: once you accept the premise that the Jews are undermining and destroying your country, it's a logical conclusion that you should kill them all, every last one of them, like Hamas. The old and the young. Robert Bowers (the Pittsburgh synagogue shooter) was not insane. If he was correct in his beliefs that Jew want "to bring invaders in that kill our people" then he was right to kill 97 year old Rose Mallinger and 10 other elderly Jews.
This is why it's not OK for opinions like those held by Bowers cannot be given mainstream respectability. Musk can have whatever outspoken opinions he wants, but no one is obligated to advertise on his platform as he is about to find out.Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality, @Anonymous, @YetAnotherAnon, @Travis, @Anon, @Thea, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Buzz Mohawk, @Buzz Mohawk
Sounds pretty totalitarian. But hey, you hold the whip, so why not.
Of course, every time you use the whip, more dumb goys notice their slavery. Bit of a conundrum for the tribe. Best to hit and hit hard so you don’t have to use the whip too often.
That said, you might consider the fragility of your weapons. Jews, of course, are small in number. You use your money to control politicians and the media. You also use blackmail.
In essence, you act like the mob. But your success in the West is mainly due to you having almost no competition. It wouldn’t be hard for other groups to adopt your tactics. Indeed, some are.
Again, the fact that no Indians or Asians outside of Twinkie even care enough to read Steve or reply to your bizarre posts should tell you something.
Also, like any parasite, you’re only a danger if your allowed to attach yourself to a host. If you think Asians don’t know who runs the West and whom they should keep out, you’re fooling yourself.
But don’t worry Jack. Jews are still on top in the West. But the world is moving in a direction that isn’t “good for the Jews.”
I wonder if that was the point. Civil War ends, around martinis at the country club they’re like “well, the South’s part of us now for good, how do we make sure we don’t get swamped, better an Italian than a…”
If we still encouraged assimilation it wouldn’t be as big a deal. The Chinese, for example, are more than capable of maintaining a civilization, and a future where the average American is 1/4 German, 1/4 English, 1/4 Mexican, and 1/4 Chinese doesn’t sound *that* bad. But we don’t.
HR Black Lady: "Ashkewhatzis? I just aksed you if the dude was white, I don't wanna know none of your nerd stuff about no 31 flavors of Joos, they all be just a bunch of white guys with little hats as far as I care." [Cue: Laugh Track].Replies: @Achmed E. Newman, @Gunnar von Cowtown
I would watch the hell out of that.
I think it was more like “we need folks willing to work in our coal mine/railroad/mill for $1/day and lately the Irish have been getting uppity and asking $1.50 so maybe we could bring in some of them I-talians instead.”
Every old protestant griping about uppity Catholics and Jews in the 1950's and 60's should have blamed Gilded Age Industrialists. But, oh no, can't do that. Entrepeneurs, men of enterprise, etc are the demigods of Protestant mythology. The cognitive dissonance required to be an Anglophone (particularly American) Protestant with larpy conservative affectations continues to amuse. You can have a coherent, conservative, communal world view or you can have adoration for the Founders and JP Morgan et al, you can't have both.
"We often give the enemy the means of our own destruction" -- AesopReplies: @Art Deco
Go with that if it helps you feel better.
“Right. I don’t see much on the left of specifically anti-Semitic rather than anti-white attitudes.”
Note that “anti-white” is poorly defined and always overbroad so as to include within it even anodyne, neutral observations by the majority white community. The Coalition of the Right Fringe that YOU belong to—Alt Right, Alt Lite, Neo Nazi, white nationalist—have competing views. Is it “anti-white” for a white man to marry an Asian woman? Is it “anti-white” for a white couple who sells their house to a black family in an all-white neighborhood? And then you have the Milo’s and Jack Donovan’s of the world—gay men—who claim to be part of the Alt Right movement. Are not their lifestyle choices “anti-white”?
Perhaps you ought to carefully ponder these important questions.
as late as 1966, there were 38 Jewish Labor MP 's~ 12% of the Parliamentary party whereas only a few Jewish Tory MPs eg Keith Joseph
But Jews are flexible strategists and moved right as sociialims was no more working in UK than in USSR. Plus Tories rated doughty as useful in Cold War 1. By Thatcher era , the ratios had flipped.Replies: @Art Deco, @Houston 1992
I think I’d audit your data source.
What aspect seems erroneous ?Replies: @Art Deco
I have many interests and won’t repost Musk again in the near future. It’s just that he’s been quite entertaining the last few days. Here is the culmination of the current affair.
He adds:
Ordinarily, I’d dismiss such talk as useless bluster. But this is the richest man in the world, who has repeatedly done the impossible. Also, he is running a business, and can at least threaten a claim of tortious interference (lawyers, correct me if I’m wrong). I predict that in the next 8 weeks Media Matters will issue a “clarification” and sign a secret codicil pledging, with penalties, to leave X alone.
And his choking of the Media Matters chicken will scare a bunch of the monkeys.
Could you please define clearly and concisely what is Anti-Whitism? Specific examples would be a bonus. Thank you.
Wallace, Podhoretz, and Jews in general need to pick a fucking side and stick with it. Either quit hiding amongst the whites to obscure your over-representation in everything or stop trying to smother whites due to their "privilege."
Here's a little bit of info for the Jews to consider and no doubt ignore: to non-whites, Jews are seen as even more white than whitey, as everything white cranked up to another level. Whitey may not love you the way you want him to, but he'll love you more than the darker peoples of the Earth ever will.Replies: @Art Deco
At the time of his birth in 1918, he was registered under the name ‘Myron Leon Wallace’. That was his legal name throughout his life. His father arrived in the United States in 1898 (at age 17) and was using the name ‘Frank Wallace’ as early as 1900. “Mike Wallace” was his billing as a radio announcer, one he carried over when he moved to television.
I’m pretty sure that in Podhoretz’s mind, “not white” means “not Archie Bunker” and “not Thurston Howell III.” Which is partly true and partly not true, but is ultimately pointless when arguing with the Left or when talking about “privilege”. They don’t care, and they’re not completely wrong not to.
By the way, the article he links to first, makes the same point Podhoretz’s father made a half-century ago, namely, that black people are pretty darn privileged via a via whites, and, second, was written about three years ago. Its author, Liebovitz, has had a big change of heart on these matters now and would see the argument of “we’re not white because we’re not privileged” as pathetic and pointless today.
Almost twenty years ago, Podhoretz attacked me pretty strongly- personally- when I suggested that Israel pulling out of Gaza might not be a good idea. I await his retraction on that, probably in vain.
But thanks for clarifying that the United States hasn’t had free speech in a very long time.
Why would any young white person fight to defend system that hates his guts?Replies: @Corvinus
“But thanks for clarifying that the United States hasn’t had free speech in a very long time.”
Of course the U.S. has free speech. It doesn’t have absolute free speech, nor speech without consequences.
“Why would any young white person fight to defend system that hates his guts?”
So if you are hated so much, and your way of life is allegedly threatened, then why aren’t you directly intervening to save you and your children?
The story runs that when he got his job at the Washington Times, he was introduced as “John Podhoretz, Norman’s son,” and accordingly his name around the office was “John P. Normanson.”
By the way, the article he links to first, makes the same point Podhoretz's father made a half-century ago, namely, that black people are pretty darn privileged via a via whites, and, second, was written about three years ago. Its author, Liebovitz, has had a big change of heart on these matters now and would see the argument of "we're not white because we're not privileged" as pathetic and pointless today.
Almost twenty years ago, Podhoretz attacked me pretty strongly- personally- when I suggested that Israel pulling out of Gaza might not be a good idea. I await his retraction on that, probably in vain.Replies: @Nachum
Let me just add that that’s *right* leaning Jews. When left leaning Jews say they’re not white, it’s because they don’t like white people, period.
It’s been written, just not published. And why is that, exactly? Could that have anything to do with the demographics of the publishing industry?
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn won the Nobel Prize in literature, yet in later years couldn’t get English translations of his books published. You’d think someone in America would publish a Nobel Prize winner, but…………..nope, nada, bupkis.
That shows you are loyal to the Government. Not loyal to the nation. Not the same thing.
However were you in Israel, you would no doubt be loyal to both.
We are tired of people like you defining what it is to be a “good citizen”. We are tired of being told by people who barely hide their contempt for us “what America is” and “who we are”.
Here, you contemptible jack-ass:
https://www.newyorker.com/news/postscript/noel-ignatievs-long-fight-against-whiteness
“Related to this is a parallax in which Jews can celebrate the fruits of their power, such as claiming in triumph to have been the prime movers for the legal recognition of ‘gay marriage,’ while a non-Jew’s less than celebratory view of Jews’ cultural and legal activism to force ‘gay marriage’ is ‘an anti-Semitic trope.’”
There was a hilarious example of this phenomenon in the past few years when Biden was talking to some Jewish group (probably to beg for money, isn’t that what all politicians do?) and he said all the things Jews have inflicted on us under tikkun olam, e.g., gay marriage, Blacks! paired with White women in television ads, etc., etc. Although he hastened to add what a great thing it all was, it was hilarious to see them squirm when a shabbas goy pointed it out. Even pre-dementia, Biden never had much of a filter.
“Wallace” is a fairly common Jewish name, a straightforward Anglicization of the also-common name Wallach, indicating an origin in Wallachia, in Romania, a place that shares an etymology with Wales (and many other words), which is the origin of “Wallace.”
What? You've never heard of Włochy?
https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/A1MUOpvLLjL._AC_UF1000,1000_QL80_.jpg
https://api.culture.pl/sites/default/files/styles/1920_auto/public/images/imported/_a%20culture%20english/language/Name_of_your_country/20170126-italy_in_european_languages770.jpg?itok=fJcLNttxReplies: @Nachum
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlachs_in_the_history_of_Croatia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlachs
Anyway- they didn't care to form a nation in any meaningful sense.
Thanks for articulating your animating logical fallacy so clearly. That therefore this.
Kind of sad you can't see it and waste so much time.Replies: @Buzz Mohawk, @res, @Jack D
Precisely. It is always that same logical fallacy, therefore even the slightest hint of criticism equals genocide — and therefore genocide in return is the only option. For a people so collectively expected to be smart, they sure are dumb collectively.*
*It’s the outliers, far up on the curve, whom we rightfully celebrate. The extremes can be great, and good for them. Individuals in any grouping have, in my Deist opinion, the inalienable right to respect. Here we discuss mostly groupings and statistical averages, and we express internet snark at individual commenters, but this activity should never be conflated with tribal hatred or intent toward violence. (Jack, of course, by breeding or upbringing, can’t possibly grok what I just wrote.)
Sitting by the fire here, after a homemade pizza made by my wife and cooked on the grill outside by me, her assistant chef, I am enjoying a sublime glass of cinnamon-spiced bourbon from a nearby, local micro-distrillery.
… And did you know that Elon Musk’s brother, Kimball, lives in Boulder, Colorado and that he has his flagship restaurant there on Pearl Street? I found out by reading the biography. I’ve been to that restaurant a bunch of times (and I’m pretty sure I met the owner in passing.) It’s funny, because I have always been pissed off that the particular restaurant occupies the space where my favorite, Mexican dive was. I played pool in the back by the bar and enjoyed dates and dinners up front in the booths. Now it belongs to Elon’s brother.
I watched the test today, and there was brother Kimball in his cowboy hat, in the control room with Elon. You may like them or not, but these people are fucking cool.
There’s a funny story about Jewison: He was hired to direct the film adaptation of Ben Hecht’s memoir of his Chicago days, Gaily, Gaily. (Hecht was dead by then.) But the producer was worried that nice WASPy Canadian Jewison didn’t “get” Chicago. So they flew him out there to see the place, meet with all sorts of prominent people, etc.
They get to their last meeting, Mayor Daley (Sr.), and his secretary says, “Sorry, the Mayor’s left town. Gone fishing in Florida.” Nice trusting Jewison says, “Well, I guess that’s it. Let’s go back to L.A.” But the producer says, “No, something’s wrong here. Let’s stay one more day.”
So they do, and the next morning the newspaper headlines are blaring about a huge scandal, half the City Council arrested, Mayor Daley mysteriously nowhere to be found. And Jewison says to the producer, “You SOB, you set this up so I’d understand Chicago better!”
* you'll probably find it impossible to resist, but try not to quote medieval York or Little Hugh of Lincoln at me.Replies: @Buzz Mohawk
Jack’ed (oof!) sez:
and then YetAnotherAnon sez:
What Jack has done is put his finger on the difference between his inbred, hostile, victimist thinking and how we other White folks see things.
Jack is White. He is Ashkenazi, which is European.
But Jack, like so many of the “elites” who control so many things now and are threatening to make Elon Musk, of all people, pay for expressing his opinion — sees things in that way.
He and they express themselves and act together like a mafia, a mob against anyone who dares open “his big mouth,” as Jack himself wrote it.
You nailed it. People born and bred to see the world a certain way will do so, and here we see the result.
There is nothing about Musk’s tweets or our comments here or anything else going on in our United States that even hints at the kind of catastrophe that Jack implies. He, and too many other American Jews, have that way of thinking, that paranoia, seared into their brains.
But hey, even if your brain is the finest filet mignon, it can still have grill marks on it. In fact, if the cooking (nurture) was any good at all, it has great marks!
It was true, just like the sci fi movies, purposely erased from future “ignorisms”
The recent unexpected IMO rise of the ills of the left wing and right wing ME lovers division— reflects the average Joejosejoa sense of unfairness, South Africa also fell to a basic assumption of unfairness it became acccepted cuz it was unfair. which has now morphed into the disaster it is..
Economist Magazine has provided similar data
What aspect seems erroneous ?
A lot of commenters here love to argue that Jews aren’t White people and Don’t you dare believe your lying eyes. Jews are obviously and observably partly non-European Caucasian pointy-skulled big-domed brethren of pale. That they are non-Christian seems less important than it used to since a good chunk of the European diaspora currently are non-religious. Didn’t White people originally wander in from Turkeyyyy, anyway? Or Mars? I can’t remember.
Ask yourself if a Black interviewer (or even an Asian one) could have gotten Mike Wallace’s job when he got it, or if a Black actor could have played Ashley in GWTW, and you have your answer.
Certainly Jews were excluded from mainstream medieval Western European society, but that society was so hierarchical and caste-bound that it’s hard to say just who was included and who was excluded. Viking raiders? Irish tribesmen? Slavic peasants? Even into the 19th century, French peasants could be as much ouside the Western “mainstream” as one could imagine. “Whiteness” was not a central concern in medieval days. Later, when it was, the position of Jews had changed in much of Europe. Not wholly insiders, but not as much on the outside as non-Whites.
Ford also had an anti-Semitism problem, even more so than Musk. Musk only said a few words but Ford wrote volumes. Like Musk is about to find out, being a racist or an anti-Semite in America is really bad for business. Ford eventually dropped the Dearborn Independent like a hot potato. But not before causing a lot of damage (Ford's business survived the damage but the Jews of Europe did not). Hitler viewed Ford as an inspiration and Ford can be seen as one of the men whose action lead directly to the Holocaust.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/11/henry-ford-anti-semitism/675911/
Viewed in this context, (again) allowing anti-Semitism to enter mainstream respectability is literally a matter of life and death for the Jews. This is what the Men of Unz don't get. Antisemitism isn't a matter of being allowed to join certain country clubs or the free expression of opinion.
Rather it is this: once you accept the premise that the Jews are undermining and destroying your country, it's a logical conclusion that you should kill them all, every last one of them, like Hamas. The old and the young. Robert Bowers (the Pittsburgh synagogue shooter) was not insane. If he was correct in his beliefs that Jew want "to bring invaders in that kill our people" then he was right to kill 97 year old Rose Mallinger and 10 other elderly Jews.
This is why it's not OK for opinions like those held by Bowers cannot be given mainstream respectability. Musk can have whatever outspoken opinions he wants, but no one is obligated to advertise on his platform as he is about to find out.Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality, @Anonymous, @YetAnotherAnon, @Travis, @Anon, @Thea, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Buzz Mohawk, @Buzz Mohawk
And isn’t it interesting that you can feel so confident as to forward a threat like that?
Isn’t it interesting that anyone, anywhere in my United States of America can threaten so much power, such a boot on the face of speech?
You don’t realize how much your very own writing here just adds to the stereotype and “conspiracy theories” and such that you pretend to disagree with. You seem not to see that your boasts of such a powerful, mafia-like, response simply confirm the very theories you don’t want anyone to repeat!
Me thinks thou doth protest too much.
I have an in-law who is an Ashkenazi Jew and she looks kinda white (except for the very curly hair) but definitely doesn't act white. She's a living, breathing stereotype of a female Jew- neurotic, uber liberal, domineering, ball busting and every single one of my wifes extremely WASPY family members is scared spitless of her. It's kind of funny watching the dynamic of a Jew amongst WASPS play out at family gatherings. I'm not a wimpy, guilt ridden, ritually polite WASP so she doesn't intimidate me in the least and doesn't fuck with me as a result.
Exactly when did world conquering WASPS become so gutless and easily intimidated?Replies: @Farenheit
When that upper case “P” became a lower case “p”, then they abandoned that “p” totally.
Elon, Kimbal, and a lady, on one of my old trails, in my old neighborhood, literally four blocks from my old townhouse:

Some days after work I would go hike this very trail at sundown.
being settler-colonialists who are constantly at war with everyone around them and generally as evil as they can get away with.
==
They’re not ‘constantly at war’ nor are they ‘evil’ to anyone without a poisonous imagination. Israel hasn’t been in a shooting war with an Arab state since 1973, bar a scatter dogfights with the Syrian air force and a couple of raids on distant points. Other than signing on to the Suez campaign in 1956-57, none of Israel’s wars with Arab states were voluntary.
==
Israel’s enemies have been paramilitary forces – Al Fatah, Hamas, the Hezbollah, miscellaneous minor allies of Al Fatah, miscellaneous Lebanese outfits. All of these have been financed by Arab governments, by Iran, and by other parties. The Arab governments also buffalo’d the Lebanese government in 1967 into harboring the P.L.O. wings. NB, prudent Arab governments don’t want these characters around, either. The Jordanian government expelled Al Fatah, et al from its territory in 1970. It allowed some to return in 1982, but confiscated their weapons on arrival. Egypt places strict controls on movement across the Gaza-Egyptian border for a reason.
==
Again, for the 1,000th time, the Arab bosses on the West Bank and Gaza have on five different occasions since 1971 been offered different situations than the one they have now. They spurned all the offers. What they have is for what they’ve opted.
And - you know - no matter how much water you carry for their tribe, they are never going to reward you.Replies: @Art Deco
We will be on our way back to Mars, if Elon Musk succeeds.
-For Jews, group identity is based in terms of particular political/religious tribes. Their identity is special clothing, education system, songs, national festival, religion, politics, rules of the romantic life and magical thinking in cult groups. If you want to know the identity there, you look more at their clothes and behavior, different festivals and the different kind of veneration. For example, religious nationalists are different races, but you can always them because they have different clothing. The women are not allowed to wear trousers. Women and men are separated to different areas. They have special festivals. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CaZBLruSVXo Secular Jewish culture is based in worship of the state, army and patriotism. They also have behaviors from the kibbutz culture. But the racial groups are diverging and they absorb different immigrants' groups from the second and third world. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7_O4kPux8EThere are also Haredim inbreeding cults which each small group has different clothes and hats to signify between each other their group and their status. They don't believe in rational worldview, but in supernatural categories, magical thinking, effects of inbreeding. If you asked those people if they are white or brown? It's like discussing with religious 18th century people,.They have such strange categories and views, they will be sometimes only controllable for a modern state because they follow an internal principle of non-violence beyond spitting. For example, they call the Israeli police Nazis and non-Jews. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikSZ-5GKlZsReplies: @Bardon Kaldian
Of course you are right.
I would just generalize: race is a relatively novel concept. Putting aside leftist blather, it is true that it came into being through more frequent contacts with other human collectives who look significantly different & who are alien in their beliefs and customs.
Herodotus describes Hellenes as a group defined by their ancestry, language, way of life, religion and customs. I would say that for traditional peoples those two signifiers were central- ancestry & beliefs/way of life/religion. That’s why some old Hebrews’ religious chiefs, Hellenized, were negotiating with rulers of the post-Alexander Hellenic empire about local privileges, invoking (mythic) common ancestry with Spartans. This was not just a trick- they truly believed in this imaginary common bond with Spartans’ ancestors.
Also, the Bible frequently talks about genealogy. Is this a proto-racial thing, then? When Ezra came from the Babylonian captivity, he urged local Jews to get rid of their non-Jewish wives. Was it a “racial” thing? I wouldn’t say so. It was very likely a period of national crystallization through matrilineal descent, so it was nothing particularly racial, but essentially a form of religious nationalism in statu nascendi.
We can see this now in the stubbornness of many Jews in their refusal to acknowledge Jewish identity to individuals who have Jewish father & not Jewish mother. So, if a man has a Jewish mother & doesn’t give a hoot about Judaism, he is, in their eyes, a Jew; on the other hand, a person with just a Jewish father who may be truly emotionally connected to Jewish identity is not considered to be a Jew, even if he goes through some non-Orthodox conversion practices. So, it is, fundamentally, about religious dogmas codified many centuries ago.
But- does it work?
I guess in theory yes, but in practice I think that even hard-core religionists can’t seriously claim that someone born to Jewish mother, raised & living as a practicing Christian is a Jew. They do claim such things, but in reality it doesn’t work. And such a person doesn’t consider himself to be Jewish, except in some extraordinary, extremely marginal cases.
Hitler killed many people who he decreed to be Jewish, but, who actually were not.
In other cases, in the US, many, perhaps most Jewish communities accept those born to Jewish mothers, but with black fathers- and it is not some kind of liberal humanitarian magnanimity, but a diluted version of ancient religious practice.
To sum it- Jews are defined, even in secular societies, by religious prescripts which may be slightly modified, but their roots are safely anchored in that religious culture’s history. That is why some white advocates like Jared Taylor are wrong when they accuse Jews like Yoram Hazony – I think I remember his name correctly- of hypocrisy of “betraying” their supposedly common principles- Jews view the social-cultural-national world differently & their position is not compatible with the dominant modern, post 18th C, European perspective. Simply, these are different world-views. There is a “naturally racialist” perspective even among non-extremist Europeans. Modern Europeans are truly secular & they don’t view the world through Christian lens- unlike American Christian fundamentalists. For some of them- not all- Christianity comes first & they would put black Christians before white American atheists belonging to the Western civilization & American nation- which is, essentially, a throwback to the medieval mentality.
Other cultures & races have their own criteria, but they also evolved through history.
Chinese, aware of their huge numbers, swallowed Caucasians- mostly Iranians & Turks- who came with Mongols & stayed after the expulsion of Mongol ruling elites. They did it through intermarriage, so these Caucasians disappeared in the Chinese sea. Just, the Chinese are highly suspicious of intermarriage with whites- now, when their perception of the world is wider. Japanese are even more racially conscious. Generally, with very few exceptions, east Asians abhor the very idea of mixing with blacks. Their race consciousness is much higher than that of an average Klansman.
With Hindus, the primary collective identity is that of caste.
At the end, I would say that, for whites/Europeans, things differ by sex. A significant number of white women would be OK with their child belonging to a different race. With men-not so. Most white men, secular Europeans, if they somehow impregnated a woman of a different race, would accept a daughter visually belonging to another race. With sons- very rarely.
Men want their sons to be mirror images of themselves, at least when it comes to race. That is the reality.
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn won the Nobel Prize in literature, yet in later years couldn't get English translations of his books published. You'd think someone in America would publish a Nobel Prize winner, but..............nope, nada, bupkis.Replies: @Art Deco
No clue how you got the idea that Jews have monopolized publishing in the English-speaking world. I doubt you’ll find much of that in Sheed & Ward’s backlist and that sort of thing is not a feature of latter-day Catholic publishing because matters of controversy and concern don’t involve the Jews.
https://www.jewishbookcouncil.org/pb-daily/jews-in-american-publishing
Anyway, who said "monopolize". I didn't. Disproportionate influence, on the other hand............
What aspect seems erroneous ?Replies: @Art Deco
Can’t imagine.
Ford also had an anti-Semitism problem, even more so than Musk. Musk only said a few words but Ford wrote volumes. Like Musk is about to find out, being a racist or an anti-Semite in America is really bad for business. Ford eventually dropped the Dearborn Independent like a hot potato. But not before causing a lot of damage (Ford's business survived the damage but the Jews of Europe did not). Hitler viewed Ford as an inspiration and Ford can be seen as one of the men whose action lead directly to the Holocaust.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/11/henry-ford-anti-semitism/675911/
Viewed in this context, (again) allowing anti-Semitism to enter mainstream respectability is literally a matter of life and death for the Jews. This is what the Men of Unz don't get. Antisemitism isn't a matter of being allowed to join certain country clubs or the free expression of opinion.
Rather it is this: once you accept the premise that the Jews are undermining and destroying your country, it's a logical conclusion that you should kill them all, every last one of them, like Hamas. The old and the young. Robert Bowers (the Pittsburgh synagogue shooter) was not insane. If he was correct in his beliefs that Jew want "to bring invaders in that kill our people" then he was right to kill 97 year old Rose Mallinger and 10 other elderly Jews.
This is why it's not OK for opinions like those held by Bowers cannot be given mainstream respectability. Musk can have whatever outspoken opinions he wants, but no one is obligated to advertise on his platform as he is about to find out.Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality, @Anonymous, @YetAnotherAnon, @Travis, @Anon, @Thea, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Buzz Mohawk, @Buzz Mohawk
Isn’t it interesting how you can make such an implied threat — a threat of the destruction of an entire business! (Gaza anyone?) — with such confidence? What does this tell us? It tells us that you are confirming the very fact that makes people increasingly angry with you.
“How dare he say anything bad about my people!”
“My people will make sure he pays!”
“My people are victims who must beware…
… but somehow we have so much power and influence that we can crush anybody who dares accuse us of having power and influence!”
I’m ignorant, so I don’t know where the saying comes from, but here it goes again, in my low-class, ignorant verbiage:
If you want to know who rules you, who lords over you, who fucking owns you, all you have to do is ask yourself, “Who am I not allowed to criticize?
John Hay thought that it was hilarious that his good friend Henry Adams believed that every thing bad was the Jews' fault (he said that when Adams saw Vesuvius smoking, he looked for the Jew that was stoking the fire). It was a harmless sort of eccentricity in an otherwise fine gentleman, like not liking baseball or being a vegetarian or collecting erotic Japanese art. English gentlemen always had these weird little eccentricities and upper class Americans patterned themselves after the English. Even Henry Ford could be thought of a sort of harmless crank, because in America his nonsense never really led to pogroms.But after Auschwitz, this kind of stuff cannot be tolerated and Jews will fight it every which way they can, using whatever levers they can and are not going to apologize for doing so and are not going to wait until this horseshit becomes mainstream discourse. Frankfurter was afraid that if he confronted FDR over the Holocaust that Franklin would not longer invite him to the WH for cocktails ("that Felix is such a downer"). Now we know the consequences of not speaking up.Replies: @Buzz Mohawk, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Jenner Ickham Errican
Mister Tibbs would be disappointed you thought so. You know that ITHOTN was based on a novel, right? It’s a complete work of fiction. The Hurricane, on the other hand, was based on a true story, so the whitewashing that occurs within is blatant propaganda.
ATLANTIC: Is Literature 'the Most Important Weapon of Propaganda'?
Stalin thought so. So, apparently, did the CIA, according to a new account of how the U.S. secretly distributed Doctor Zhivago in the Soviet Union.
Really? I thought you were an Israeli, going by what you’ve been writing here, especially in the recent weeks.
Nah. I wouldn’t care. In fact, I might prefer it, so I know where you stand instead of this shiftiness (at once “fellow white,” “fellow immigrant-stock,” “fellow persecuted minority” cards you pull as your convenience dictates).
On that score, though, do you see me crying about “anti-Koreanism” or “anti-Asianism” among “the Men of Unz” like you do about “anti-Semitism”? (or advocating that South Korea should “periodically mow the lawn” of North Korea and kill North Korean women and children as you say about the Israelis in Gaza)? No, my preponderant sentiment toward America and Americans is one of gratitude. When there was a false hysteria about “anti-Asian hate/violence,” I am the one who refuted it statistically, showing that, in actuality, Asians suffered the smallest growth in criminal victimization during the period in question. I am also not the one who belongs to the most sacralized and dominant ethnic group in the country, but constantly harps about being The Victimest People EvahTM here.
Are you suggesting only “old white bigot[s]” express criticism about Jews evincing self-serving clannishness and hostility toward the majorities/host populations? Have you read the history of your people recently (or ever)? American goyish whites have been the most benevolent and philosemitic people in the history of your people, yet you just can’t refrain from your reflexive anti-(goyish) whitism, can you?
Your usual strawman. I am happy that Stephen Miller is a fellow American. You know, the guy who told the traitorous buffoon who showed up with his IDF uniform in Congress to take it off?
I am critical of Jews like you and wish those who are similarly ungrateful and hostile to the majority population to vote with their feet and go where they feel welcome and bask in the warmth of their own ethnocentrism – in your case, that’d be Israel. So, why don’t you go where you clearly feel at home?
Written like a good little Hofjude, parroting the elites. I am pretty sure that George Washington meant “effectual support” for your fellow countrymen and, indeed, the country as a whole, not the material interests of the elites in power among whom your ethnic kinsmen are preponderant.
Keep at it – you are surely winning friends and allies to your cause.
Anyone who has been to Israel knows that Jews are not a race or even an ethnic group. Even in Europe, the different groups of Jews don’t seem to be closely related. Jews are not a race or an ethnicity, and I wouldn’t really call Jews a religious group, either. Jews seem to be something of a cross between a mafia and a cult with religious overtones.
“whites like… Jews,” LOL. Jews are what? 2% of the country at most? Ellis Island Jews aren’t the reason the country is still white. Try Catholic Irish and Italians (and Germans, too, for that matter, especially from the Catholic parts in the west and the south of the country).
BTW, I’m pretty sure that descendants of most Ellis Island whites such as the Irish and the Italians now vote for the Republican Party (as a NYT article once described, “from Tammany Hall to Build the Wall”). Except one group. Can you guess which one?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Stock_Americans#/media/File:National_Origins_of_the_White_Population_of_the_USA,_1920.png
Why? Wallace was just being loyal to his people. How is that wrong?
https://twitter.com/breakingbaht/status/1724892505647296620Accusing Jews of pushing dialectical hatred is not neutral. It is a serious and false accusation, as is accusing the Jews of flooding the country with hordes of minorities.
Of course I see the Jews accused of these two things (and worse) on Unz every day so around here these blood libels seem commonplace and not shocking. But out in the real world these are serious, anti-Semitic accusations and Musk is (rightly) going to get punched back hard for trying to bring these fringe views out from under their rock and into mainstream discourse in America.Replies: @Cagey Beast, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Technite78, @Alec Leamas (working from home), @New Dealer, @SFG, @clifford brown, @PhysicistDave, @Alec Leamas (working from home)
Jack, would the message be more palatable if delivered by a fellow Jew?:
This is reasoned, measured, and well supported.
For some mysterious reason, way back in the '60's, the conventional view of the holocaust shifted from blaming it on those crazy neo-pagan Nietzsche-reading & Wagner-listening German Nationalists...to blaming it on white Christians.
Solzhenitsyn’s Two Hundred Years Together most likely can’t be published in English because someone owns the English language rights to it. There would be no need to control the entire publishing industry.
https://i.ibb.co/GTC2LgC/jeantel2.png
https://i.ibb.co/Gsj0pC3/jeantel3.png
https://i.ibb.co/vjDDbfY/jeantel4.png
https://i.ibb.co/XXfWSfR/jeantel5r.pngReplies: @anonymouseperson
The truth is always said in jest. Jews are the ultimate con artists.
Otherwise it would have ended up 40% black overall like Mississippi .
==
Yes it would have, had the black population increased 5.7-fold since 1890 while the white population increased by 16% (presuming no immigration).
==
Should note that in 1930, the number of people who listed their father as having been born in one of a menu of eastern and southern European countries was about 15 million (and that includes Germanophones in the Hapsburg dominions). Those listing their father as having been born in Canada, the British Isles, Scandinavia, Germany, the Low Countries, France, and Switzerland numbered about 18 million.
Without immigration Blacks would have numbered about 24% of the population. In 1860 Blacks made up about 17% of the population. That numbers includes White immigrants so the ratio would always have been been higher versus founding stock. There's reason to believe the ratio would always have hoovered around 4 to 1.
In 1920 those of immigrant stock numbered 53,000,000. Of those 16 million were from Ireland or Great Britain and 12 million from Germany. America was overwhelmingly a Northern European nation.
What’s hilarious is these same elites or their upper middle class lackeys for the next 2-3 generations wring their hands over the loss of WASP supremacy.
Every old protestant griping about uppity Catholics and Jews in the 1950’s and 60’s should have blamed Gilded Age Industrialists. But, oh no, can’t do that. Entrepeneurs, men of enterprise, etc are the demigods of Protestant mythology.
The cognitive dissonance required to be an Anglophone (particularly American) Protestant with larpy conservative affectations continues to amuse. You can have a coherent, conservative, communal world view or you can have adoration for the Founders and JP Morgan et al, you can’t have both.
Uh, Jack, you wrote:
Umm… My dear wife is a Hungarian citizen, voted for Orban. She is not Catholic.
She is what they call “Református,” which is what we here call Protestant.
The closest analogy would be Calvinist, at least from what I understand. Probably half the Hungarians we know, here or there, are Református, even though Catholics are the majority. Wikipedia says there are 1.6 million of them over there, second only to Catholics.
God is real,
But all of this religion stuff is human-laid bullshit, including your particular, Jewish cult and the whole tepestry of churches, synogogues, mosques and temples across Europe and around the globe — plus all the books and lies and fables that go along with them.
Get over it.
No clue what the right career for JP would have been – English teacher, perhaps.
Wouldn’t an English teacher know how to spell “repellent”?
If only it was. He'd be much less harmful.Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
See Steve’s John Podhoretz problem—and ours. https://vdare.com/articles/podhoretz-junior-vs-steve-sailer
Par for the course.Replies: @Wokechoke
Just goes to show that this conflict isn’t even about Gaza
Sailer is making up this conversation.
On the hiring/enrollment forms Jews are…white. This suits everyone apart from white people. It’s done so whites don’t get hired and placed, but Jews do.
They can also say “I’m a Jew” and the queer or Shaniqua will go silent in terror.
This script never happens. Steve is imagining such interactions.
"How dare he say anything bad about my people!"
"My people will make sure he pays!"
"My people are victims who must beware...
... but somehow we have so much power and influence that we can crush anybody who dares accuse us of having power and influence!"
I'm ignorant, so I don't know where the saying comes from, but here it goes again, in my low-class, ignorant verbiage:
If you want to know who rules you, who lords over you, who fucking owns you, all you have to do is ask yourself, "Who am I not allowed to criticize?Replies: @Jack D
This was not a threat. I have no power to make Sony and Warner Brothers and IBM and Apple and so on do anything. I am just telling you what is going to happen and what has already happened. Even a dog knows not to bite the hand that feeds it. Do you think Jews will keep giving their money to people who are literally putting their lives in danger, after all that has happened in the last century? Sorry, not happening.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/18/technology/elon-musk-twitter-x-advertisers.html#:~:text=More%20major%20advertisers%20have%20paused,halting%20their%20spending%20on%20X.
John Hay thought that it was hilarious that his good friend Henry Adams believed that every thing bad was the Jews’ fault (he said that when Adams saw Vesuvius smoking, he looked for the Jew that was stoking the fire). It was a harmless sort of eccentricity in an otherwise fine gentleman, like not liking baseball or being a vegetarian or collecting erotic Japanese art. English gentlemen always had these weird little eccentricities and upper class Americans patterned themselves after the English. Even Henry Ford could be thought of a sort of harmless crank, because in America his nonsense never really led to pogroms.
But after Auschwitz, this kind of stuff cannot be tolerated and Jews will fight it every which way they can, using whatever levers they can and are not going to apologize for doing so and are not going to wait until this horseshit becomes mainstream discourse. Frankfurter was afraid that if he confronted FDR over the Holocaust that Franklin would not longer invite him to the WH for cocktails (“that Felix is such a downer”). Now we know the consequences of not speaking up.
Look, I've known for a very long time that whites are the house ni$$ers of Jews, but most whites have no clue. People like you are doing a great job letting them know their place.
But here's the thing, Jack. If you turn this into a caged death match between Jews and whites, don't be surprised if the other side accepts the challenge.
The heathen not living up to Enlightenment ideals, while not great, is understandable in Steve's mind. They are heathen, after all. But whites misbehaving by, say, wanting to think of themselves as a group, is unforgivable.
Steve would have made a great pastor or small college professor in 19th century New England. He's definitely not made for the 21st century.
The Ideological Age is ending. The Demographic Age has begun. Steve laments that.Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality
This may identify what is so infuriating about a certain kind of Missionary Mentality; they impose burdens on their own people in order to virtue signal for private gain. They are callous to the suffering of their own people.
However, if Steve feels that way about the Jewish community, is that de facto anti-Semitism? Since it implies that he views them as some lower alien group that gets a pass for less than White behavior.
John Hay thought that it was hilarious that his good friend Henry Adams believed that every thing bad was the Jews' fault (he said that when Adams saw Vesuvius smoking, he looked for the Jew that was stoking the fire). It was a harmless sort of eccentricity in an otherwise fine gentleman, like not liking baseball or being a vegetarian or collecting erotic Japanese art. English gentlemen always had these weird little eccentricities and upper class Americans patterned themselves after the English. Even Henry Ford could be thought of a sort of harmless crank, because in America his nonsense never really led to pogroms.But after Auschwitz, this kind of stuff cannot be tolerated and Jews will fight it every which way they can, using whatever levers they can and are not going to apologize for doing so and are not going to wait until this horseshit becomes mainstream discourse. Frankfurter was afraid that if he confronted FDR over the Holocaust that Franklin would not longer invite him to the WH for cocktails ("that Felix is such a downer"). Now we know the consequences of not speaking up.Replies: @Buzz Mohawk, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Jenner Ickham Errican
Ahh, once again, and a trillion times over, the Holocaust™ serves as the excuse for bad behavior.
You sound just like a Black! criminal making excuses for his gang members because, muh, slavery.
You say, pithily:
So, goyim like Musk are dogs, and their food comes from Jews. We get it, Jack.
How is it that so much of that dog food comes from your mob that even a gazillionaire like Musk hypothetically should worry about losing it and his business starving?
Say one bad thing about the hand that feeds you, and you get bit. I see…
… I see a frigging self-fulfilling prophesy wrapped in a feedback loop inside a sociopathic mentality.
However were you in Israel, you would no doubt be loyal to both.
We are tired of people like you defining what it is to be a "good citizen". We are tired of being told by people who barely hide their contempt for us "what America is" and "who we are".Replies: @Jack D
I’m not the one who defined good citizenship as being loyal to the elected government. That would be George Washington.
The Jews of America didn’t steal their wealth. They earned it by providing popular goods and services like movies and broadcast entertainment. If you are a billionaire like Shari Redstone, you are never going to spend all your billions. If you don’t use it to save your people from potential genocide (or at least withhold it from those who do), what good is all that money? Is she somehow obligated to ignore what she rightly perceives as a threat to her very life (and yes it is a threat for the reasons I have already explained) and keep writing checks to a man who is promoting poison?
You might want to reflect in an age of SBF, Bernie Madoff, and Michael Milken.
But maybe you're talking about the virtuous people of hollywood?
https://youtu.be/EbWCFWw5rH4?si=lB8kQAVsH21hxk10Replies: @Jack D, @Colin Wright
No, you’re an American who vociferously and uncritically supports a foreign country that is committing horrific warcrimes, has repeatedly and murderously attacked us, spies on us incessantly, and exerts a catastrophic influence on our political process.
I would compare it to past situations — but there’s really nothing to compare it to. Somebody who endorsed the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, or Imperial Japan would have been relatively harmless in comparison. After all, the influence of American Jews on behalf of Israel is effective.
==
The 'war crimes' do not exist outside your imagination.Replies: @lavoisier
With all the focus on “mental health” funding, and the arrival of PTSD as bona fide eligible avenue for financial assistance…. It must be a real thing ..
Cultural PTSD, the gift that keeps on giving
Everyone gets to suffer,
Be that as it may. It would also appear that Walsh was a careful, respected historian, familiar with Spanish history. If he claimed Jews opened the the gates of Visigothic cities to the Moors and acted as their allies and agents, it’s probably true.
…and why shouldn’t it be true? Can you explain why the Jews of Spain would have felt any especial loyalty to the Visigothic kingdom, or preferred its rule to that of the Muslims?
Let’s face at least one fact: through at least about 1700, Jews were generally on Team Islam, not that of the Christians. This isn’t bad or good; it’s just the way it was.
China, Russia, Sudan , Morocco, Nigeria, Somalia, Turkey, Syria , Iraq , Iran , Pakistan, Indonesia are all accused of occupying other people’s land. Do you get worked up about these countries too ? I know the answer.
Sumner Redstone made his ill-gotten gain off MTV, which spent 30 years destroying the fabric of this country. Is that your example of a hero Jewish businessman?
You might want to reflect in an age of SBF, Bernie Madoff, and Michael Milken.
But maybe you’re talking about the virtuous people of hollywood?
Wouldn't an English teacher know how to spell "repellent"?
https://twitter.com/jpodhoretz/status/903440382494728192Replies: @Colin Wright, @Poirot
Be fair. That was just a typo. Illiteracy is not one of Podhoretz’ flaws as a human being.
If only it was. He’d be much less harmful.
John Hay thought that it was hilarious that his good friend Henry Adams believed that every thing bad was the Jews' fault (he said that when Adams saw Vesuvius smoking, he looked for the Jew that was stoking the fire). It was a harmless sort of eccentricity in an otherwise fine gentleman, like not liking baseball or being a vegetarian or collecting erotic Japanese art. English gentlemen always had these weird little eccentricities and upper class Americans patterned themselves after the English. Even Henry Ford could be thought of a sort of harmless crank, because in America his nonsense never really led to pogroms.But after Auschwitz, this kind of stuff cannot be tolerated and Jews will fight it every which way they can, using whatever levers they can and are not going to apologize for doing so and are not going to wait until this horseshit becomes mainstream discourse. Frankfurter was afraid that if he confronted FDR over the Holocaust that Franklin would not longer invite him to the WH for cocktails ("that Felix is such a downer"). Now we know the consequences of not speaking up.Replies: @Buzz Mohawk, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Jenner Ickham Errican
It’s fun to watch the mask drop, not that you ever hid your disdain for the goys but other Jews were more controlled.
Look, I’ve known for a very long time that whites are the house ni$$ers of Jews, but most whites have no clue. People like you are doing a great job letting them know their place.
But here’s the thing, Jack. If you turn this into a caged death match between Jews and whites, don’t be surprised if the other side accepts the challenge.
Of course, every time you use the whip, more dumb goys notice their slavery. Bit of a conundrum for the tribe. Best to hit and hit hard so you don't have to use the whip too often.
That said, you might consider the fragility of your weapons. Jews, of course, are small in number. You use your money to control politicians and the media. You also use blackmail.
In essence, you act like the mob. But your success in the West is mainly due to you having almost no competition. It wouldn't be hard for other groups to adopt your tactics. Indeed, some are.
Again, the fact that no Indians or Asians outside of Twinkie even care enough to read Steve or reply to your bizarre posts should tell you something.
Also, like any parasite, you're only a danger if your allowed to attach yourself to a host. If you think Asians don't know who runs the West and whom they should keep out, you're fooling yourself.
But don't worry Jack. Jews are still on top in the West. But the world is moving in a direction that isn't "good for the Jews."Replies: @Anon, @Twinkie
By ” Asians” I presume you mean Chinese ??
Who’s not White now?
You like that George Washington quote, but for some reason never include the following paragraph. Emphasis mine.
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/05-06-02-0135
Thanks for articulating your animating logical fallacy so clearly. That therefore this.
Kind of sad you can't see it and waste so much time.Replies: @Buzz Mohawk, @res, @Jack D
It also serves as a window into people’s thinking. Projection is real.
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/05-06-02-0135Replies: @Jack D
According to Buzz, that’s a threat, but I don’t read it that way. The Jews of America have contributed immeasurably to American society and more than merit the good will of their fellow citizens. And despite the Men of Unz, the good people of America, from the White House on down, continue to extend such good will. The backlash against Musk has not just come from Jews.
Of course, every time you use the whip, more dumb goys notice their slavery. Bit of a conundrum for the tribe. Best to hit and hit hard so you don't have to use the whip too often.
That said, you might consider the fragility of your weapons. Jews, of course, are small in number. You use your money to control politicians and the media. You also use blackmail.
In essence, you act like the mob. But your success in the West is mainly due to you having almost no competition. It wouldn't be hard for other groups to adopt your tactics. Indeed, some are.
Again, the fact that no Indians or Asians outside of Twinkie even care enough to read Steve or reply to your bizarre posts should tell you something.
Also, like any parasite, you're only a danger if your allowed to attach yourself to a host. If you think Asians don't know who runs the West and whom they should keep out, you're fooling yourself.
But don't worry Jack. Jews are still on top in the West. But the world is moving in a direction that isn't "good for the Jews."Replies: @Anon, @Twinkie
Several commenters on Unz are Asian (some even Indian), for whatever that’s worth. And I am pretty sure even more are (anonymous) readers.
I am pretty certain some of the commenters/readers are Jews as well. But only Jack is stupid enough to play “Fellow whites/Hasbara” shtick on the same thread.
The way you "talk" to Jack is different from whites. It's subtle, but it's there.
Jews' mind tricks fall on deaf ears when used against non-whites. There's an indifference with your comments to Jack that isn't there with whites.
It's fun to watch because Jack can't see it. Jews are a remarkably talented people, but self-awareness isn't exactly their strong suit.Replies: @Twinkie
You might want to reflect in an age of SBF, Bernie Madoff, and Michael Milken.
But maybe you're talking about the virtuous people of hollywood?
https://youtu.be/EbWCFWw5rH4?si=lB8kQAVsH21hxk10Replies: @Jack D, @Colin Wright
Whut? MTV destroyed America? You folks are even more off the deep end than I imagined. What else destroyed America? Archie comics? Bubble gum?
MTV promoted Gansta Rap - I can hardly imagine a more baleful cultural influence. And of course the music business is - surprise, surprise - one of those businesses that is heavily influenced by members of a particular group that Art Deco and you will deny have such an influence (you because you stand up for your people and Art Deco because he's a Boomer who has been culturally programmed to stand up for your people). Oh, and Johann Ricke too - I almost forgot your shadow.
Do tell, how the Jews of America have merited the good will of their fellow citizens who are not Jews.
JFC, grow up. There is a certain subset in the American population who hate Jews, at worst, or are not fans of them, at best, so they project that attitude onto the rest of normie population. As if we whites are in the same page with them when it’s likely we do not harbor those same feelings.
But the remarkable thing is that you and Jack are so sensitive to the point that you each play the victim card when it both suits you. How about you both go back?Replies: @Colin Wright
Thanks for articulating your animating logical fallacy so clearly. That therefore this.
Kind of sad you can't see it and waste so much time.Replies: @Buzz Mohawk, @res, @Jack D
How is that a fallacy? If some group is really destroying your country, isn’t it proper and necessary to eliminate them as a matter of self defense?
Whoa, that statement seems way too close to the edge Jack… it might be suggested that “group” be limited to a narrowed select. I’m all for an 👁️ for an 👁️, but not at the price of total loss of all.
Lex Fridman’s just released discussion with John Mearsheimer:
https://youtu.be/KDjEj2gOlN0?si=GLQtQfo8IEcAcZSB
Do you really want them to follow your logic? Or is your sole objection that they are factually mistaken? So that if they make a good case, then they are indeed entitled to "eliminate [you] as a matter of self defense"?
Be careful what you wish for, Jack!
What group were you thinking of? Was this in reference to the United States?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYPAvT-3Fvs
This is reasoned, measured, and well supported.Replies: @Twinkie, @vinteuil
Of course not. Jack D would consider such an honest Jew a “self-loathing Jew,” just as he accused me of hating myself (or something), because I am a pro-American assimilationist.
People like him are poison to the cohesion and good of the country, because they are constantly angling and being shifty to benefit themselves and their own kin, the rest of us be damned.
I don’t take “whiteness” seriously. But in the countries that have (South Africa, the Confederacy), Jews have enjoyed all the privileges that come with white skin.
“If some group is really destroying your country, isn’t it proper and necessary to eliminate them as a matter of self defense?”
Whoa, that statement seems way too close to the edge Jack… it might be suggested that “group” be limited to a narrowed select. I’m all for an 👁️ for an 👁️, but not at the price of total loss of all.
Lex Fridman’s just released discussion with John Mearsheimer:
This interminable Israel-Palestine conflict is turning into the Vietnam War of the Jews, with the October 7 events as their Tet Offensive.
No other single issue did more to discredit the old WASP ruling elite than Vietnam, a war they started but proved unable to win or extricate themselves from. (Yes I know the war was started by an Irishman, escalated by a Texan, and ended by a Quaker, but the broader point stands.)
Of course Tet was a major defeat for the communists, and the U.S. and its local allies inflicted heavy losses on them, but the fact that such a thing could even happen after seven years of fighting was itself a huge propaganda victory for the communists.
We can say something similar about this recent Hamas offensive. It’s significance isn’t that it was defeated, but that it ever happened at all.
Of course the U.S. has free speech. It doesn’t have absolute free speech, nor speech without consequences.
“Why would any young white person fight to defend system that hates his guts?”
So if you are hated so much, and your way of life is allegedly threatened, then why aren’t you directly intervening to save you and your children?Replies: @Colin Wright
Possibly he doesn’t say because we don’t have free speech.
Jack didn’t say the Jewish contribution had been positive.
==
They're not 'constantly at war' nor are they 'evil' to anyone without a poisonous imagination. Israel hasn't been in a shooting war with an Arab state since 1973, bar a scatter dogfights with the Syrian air force and a couple of raids on distant points. Other than signing on to the Suez campaign in 1956-57, none of Israel's wars with Arab states were voluntary.
==
Israel's enemies have been paramilitary forces - Al Fatah, Hamas, the Hezbollah, miscellaneous minor allies of Al Fatah, miscellaneous Lebanese outfits. All of these have been financed by Arab governments, by Iran, and by other parties. The Arab governments also buffalo'd the Lebanese government in 1967 into harboring the P.L.O. wings. NB, prudent Arab governments don't want these characters around, either. The Jordanian government expelled Al Fatah, et al from its territory in 1970. It allowed some to return in 1982, but confiscated their weapons on arrival. Egypt places strict controls on movement across the Gaza-Egyptian border for a reason.
==
Again, for the 1,000th time, the Arab bosses on the West Bank and Gaza have on five different occasions since 1971 been offered different situations than the one they have now. They spurned all the offers. What they have is for what they've opted.Replies: @Mr. Anon
Why are you replying to me? I didn’t write that.
And – you know – no matter how much water you carry for their tribe, they are never going to reward you.
==
You quoted it and endorsed it.Replies: @Mr. Anon
She is what they call "Református," which is what we here call Protestant.
The closest analogy would be Calvinist, at least from what I understand. Probably half the Hungarians we know, here or there, are Református, even though Catholics are the majority. Wikipedia says there are 1.6 million of them over there, second only to Catholics.
God is real,
But all of this religion stuff is human-laid bullshit, including your particular, Jewish cult and the whole tepestry of churches, synogogues, mosques and temples across Europe and around the globe -- plus all the books and lies and fables that go along with them.
Get over it.Replies: @AceDeuce
My Hungarian grandfather was Hungarian Reformed–I think that at least a third of Hungarians are. Plus many of the Hungarian “Catholics” are “Greek Catholics”, not Roman–somewhat closer to Orthodox than the Vatican-based kind.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hungarian_Greek_Catholic_Church
You might want to reflect in an age of SBF, Bernie Madoff, and Michael Milken.
But maybe you're talking about the virtuous people of hollywood?
https://youtu.be/EbWCFWw5rH4?si=lB8kQAVsH21hxk10Replies: @Jack D, @Colin Wright
Could be worse. There’s Paul Singer. George Soros. Bernie Madoff. I suppose I could go on.
Gosh, I don’t know, by listening to them:
https://www.jewishbookcouncil.org/pb-daily/jews-in-american-publishing
Anyway, who said “monopolize”. I didn’t. Disproportionate influence, on the other hand…………
That isn’t what that quote said. That is how you construed it.
“Europeans”:
https://image.pbs.org/video-assets/cxQLgXB-asset-mezzanine-16x9-R6TlJe6.jpg
https://cdn.theatlantic.com/thumbor/d5_F0LDlebmEP7NtEui4qkOA_ys=/0x259:3236x2079/960x540/media/img/mt/2018/12/AP_18300046311571/original.jpgReplies: @YetAnotherAnon, @PhysicistDave
Jenner Ickham Errican wrote to me:
Ashkenazim are a European ethnic group going back for over a thousand years.
They even look European.
Neither is true for African-Americans.
You may dislike Ashkenazi Jews, but they were as European as Ukrainians or Bulgarians.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/john-podhoretz-jews-are-not-white/#comment-6270497Replies: @Anonymous, @PhysicistDave
It struck me the other day out in a pasture burning dead cedar and post oaks, felled by lightning or disease or drought, …. Even tho about every 5-7 yrs Kanye West says or does something outrageous, the last time he was announced as ghosted and forever beyond the pale, I sensed a substantial minor portion of the “citizenry” felt it unfair.
It was true, just like the sci fi movies, purposely erased from future “ignorisms”
The recent unexpected IMO rise of the ills of the left wing and right wing ME lovers division— reflects the average Joejosejoa sense of unfairness, South Africa also fell to a basic assumption of unfairness it became acccepted cuz it was unfair. which has now morphed into the disaster it is..
Jack D wrote to Anon:
A number of posters here sincerely believe that you and other American Jews are “really destroying [our] country.”
Do you really want them to follow your logic? Or is your sole objection that they are factually mistaken? So that if they make a good case, then they are indeed entitled to “eliminate [you] as a matter of self defense”?
Be careful what you wish for, Jack!
My past impression was that Jack D was fair and made some useful points, but I never studied him closely.
His posts in this thread are deluded. He’s chasing imaginary phantoms, his priors of ANTISEMITES ATTACKING JEWS so high, that he can’t see what’s going on in reality. I laid out the details at posts 148 and especially 241. I noticed that he responded to more abstractly inclined critics, but failed to acknowledge my more empirical reports about the controversy at X.
First, Musk is not an antisemite. The claim crumples quickly when the entirety of evidence is surveyed. He is a consistent antiracist. He has criticized ADL and those like ADL for their racism, clarifying that he should not be understood to be criticizing all Jews (which would be racist).
Second, the righteous are not slaughtering the Amalekites at Musk’s X. The advertising boycott was not based on true facts about X and was not spontaneous moral outrage . Musk says (and I believe him) that Media Matters generated fraudulent materials purporting to show a prestige ad next to a poisonous post, claiming it was typical of X, and in an organized fashion shared it with major advertisers urging them to drop X . That is why Musk is gleeful about showing up in court on Monday morning, ready to harvest many millions of dollars with claims of tortious interference.
I’m guessing that Media Matters was habituated to ruining the lives of little people, and didn’t stop to think what would happen if they tried to ruin someone who has the the power and right to destroy them.
Here’s the thought of super-genius Jewish guy at the end of his life (in exile in Iceland). A guy who had a superhuman ability to intuitively game out 10^40 combinations.
But what does language have to do with it anyway? Are black Americans white? Are Hungarians not?Yes, there's internal tension, but it was hardly about to tear Israel apart, and none of it was ever going to help the Palestinians any.
Arabs might not be very smart, or able to stop acting in ways that are almost unbelievably pointless and self-destructive, but even they know better than to expect some kind of win just from waiting for Israel to tear itself apart somehow.
And whether Jews are one people or not, keeping Israel strong is no less in the Mizrahim's interest than it is the Ashkenazim's, so who really cares whether it's a con? If it is, it's a mutually beneficial one for all Israeli Jews, and no amount of outsider online pointing and sputtering of the kind seen over the past month will ever change that.Replies: @PhysicistDave
Anonymous[144] wrote to me:
When actual residence in Europe for over a thousand years, a substantial fraction of their DNA, their language, their culture, etc., all says they are Europeans, it is simply perverse to deny that Ashkenazim are Europeans.
We could argue about whether language is more important than DNA or whether residence for over a thousand years trumps culture. but all of it points to Ashkenazim being Europeans.
And, yes, a case could be made that they are more European than Hungarians: I had a classmate in high school who was of Hungarian descent — looked a bit central Asian, perhaps because of the origins of the Magyars.
But of course it would be perverse to claim that the Hungarians nowadays are not Europeans. And it is equally perverse to deny that Ashkenazim were.
Such things are indeed a bit fuzzy around the edges, but that is not the case for either Hungarians or Ashkenazim. Europeans all.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/confused-anti-semitic-muslim-terrorist-attacks-black-hebrew-israelite-facility/#comment-6250212Replies: @PhysicistDave
We could argue about whether language is more important than DNA or whether residence for over a thousand years trumps culture. but all of it points to Ashkenazim being Europeans.
And, yes, a case could be made that they are more European than Hungarians: I had a classmate in high school who was of Hungarian descent -- looked a bit central Asian, perhaps because of the origins of the Magyars.
But of course it would be perverse to claim that the Hungarians nowadays are not Europeans. And it is equally perverse to deny that Ashkenazim were.
Such things are indeed a bit fuzzy around the edges, but that is not the case for either Hungarians or Ashkenazim. Europeans all.Replies: @res
I tend to agree with your point (all Europeans), but one can make an argument that Hungarians are more European than Ashkenazim. See PCA plots here.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/confused-anti-semitic-muslim-terrorist-attacks-black-hebrew-israelite-facility/#comment-6250212
Palestinians do: Muslim and Christian.
Wasn’t there some people who spent two thousand years claiming Jerusalem was their home and that some day they would return?
‘The next beer in Jerusalem’, wasn’t it? Something like that.
I have the impression Hitler said something along those lines.
What group were you thinking of? Was this in reference to the United States?
Really? Are you really that much of an antisemite that you don’t know? We could start with the 22% of Nobel prizes that have been awarded to Jews.
A long time ago, I suggested that absent Jews, we might be ten years behind where we are technologically -- but in immeasurably better shape in innumerable other ways.
Do I want to be in 2023 America with all its problems -- or in an America with two hundred million mostly white people, no such thing as 'transgender' individuals, a rational legal system, homosexuals confined to merely being tolerated, no Israeli ball 'n chain, and blacks as no more than a somewhat unedifying minority -- but saddled with 2013 technology?
Oh, that's a toughie, Jack. Youall have done so much for us...Replies: @Wokechoke, @Twinkie
What’s bizarre is you would’ve thought Jewish people, being a minority, would want to garner friendly relations with the larger population of white people.
But it was just the opposite!
The Muslims and Poles had this experience long before us. Remember 'Judeo-Christian values'?
Ah yes -- but that was then. This is now.Replies: @Anonymous
Good posts–a breath of fresh air. As you note, a lot of people here put much more energy into dutifully rehashing the same old ideological arguments than they do into considering empirical information.
They should have the courage of their convictions like Robert Bowers (currently on death row). Otherwise they are just windbags who don’t really believe their own bullshit. Or else they are trying to get others to be their patsies.
At the time of writing genocide was not considered morally wrong, and it was somewhat equivalent to the myths about King Arthur and Robin Hood which boosted the morale of medieval Brits living through the Black Death and hoping to see a Merrie England again.
Unfortunately what the Jews never planned for was that these national foundation myths would be incorporated into the Christian Bible and spread across the world by missionaries who claimed that every word of the Bible was true.
Talk about being hoist by your own petard.Replies: @PhysicistDave, @YetAnotherAnon
Jonathan Mason wrote to me:
You are of course correct, and if you look back carefully through all my comments, you will see me making the same point many times.
But the problem is not that Moses really massacred three thousand innocents — Moses almost certainly did not exist — or that Saul committed genocide against the Amalekites, which probably did not happen.
The problem is that many Jews today, especially in Israel, are raised on such stories and encouraged to think this is praiseworthy behavior, whether or not it really did happen.
And that is illustrated all too clearly in the video Katie Halper put together with Bibi appealing to the Biblical command to annihilate Amalek.
No, that never happened. But Bibi wants to make it happen today.
And that is horrifying.
This is not an aberration.
Read Israel Shahak’s Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years or read the various books by Israeli historian Shlomo Sand.
The views of many current Zionists are truly genocidal.
Again, as I keep emphasizing, this is most assuredly not true of all Jews or of all Israelis of Jewish descent. It is just as wrong to lump all Jews together with the genocidal Jews as to lump all Palestinians in with Hamas.
Jon also wrote:
It is true that Jews have tended to interpret the Hebrew Bible (the “Old Testament”) in a more flexible, allegorical manner than fundamentalist Christians do.
But, just as Americans take the apocryphal story of George Washington and the cherry tree as a tale encouraging honest behavior, whether that story is actually historically true or not, so also way too many Jews take the horrific stories of genocide as guides to proper behavior, even if they are not historically true.
And that is shown by the video put together by Katie Halper, by the books of Sand and Shahak, and many other sources.
And, indeed, if you talk to lots of Jews, the “God gave this land to me” and “We are the Chosen People of God” myths come shining through, even (maybe especially) among those who do not believe in the literal truth of the Hebrew Bible.
Again: not all Jews.
But, unfortunately, a substantial number.
And, although I have had various negative things to say about Christianity, I do not think this is the fault of Christian missionaries.
Most people "know" that Moses led the Jews out of Egypt after a series of plagues and the parting of the Red Sea, that Joshua "fit the battle of Jericho", that David killed Goliath with a stone, Samson brought the house down on the Philistines, Solomon ruled over a mighty empire, and that wicked Jewish (not actually Jewish) King Herod (or was it King Wenceslas?) killed all the Jewish boys under the age of 2 so as to kill off the Messiah who escaped the pogrom by being born in a stable where there was no registration of births (and who must have been the top student in his year at school due to lack of competition).
However ALL of these "known facts" are probably pure fiction.
Now that is just on the Western side of the religous curtain. God knows what the average person believes is true history on the Muslim side., or the Jewish side.Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @PhysicistDave
Historically, Christians were the ones who allegorized the Bible, not Jews (with a few exceptions like Philo Judaeus).
I don't know much about how Jews interpreted those morally repellent passages throughout history. But, it remains a thorny issue. And one should also add that Christians adopted those stories & I am not aware they were morally outraged by those genocidal passages about Amalekites & other sanctified killings. Perhaps Gnostic Marcion was, post festum, morally right when he wanted all Christians to dump the entire Hebrew Bible.
Something can be gleaned from Paul's attitude towards these stories. He is always talking about the Law & theological-spiritual topics, but never addresses "unpleasant", genocidal parts. It could be - and I may be wrong here - that Jewish rabbis were selective readers, cherry-picking parts that could be justified by more or less universal conscience & skipping over the genocidal porn. And, on the other hand, they could have swallowed it all, hook, line & sinker, thus making historical Judaism a culture possessing a strong pathological, murderous exclusivity & genocidal hysterical lineaments.
This is a serious issue, because Dostoevsky had been justifying his anti-judaism by explicitly addressing those passages & rhetorically asking: what if Jews were numerically superior to Russians & had the upper hand- would they systematically murder them as they did all those peoples enumerated in the Hebrew Bible?
Being chosen is not such a big deal. I think Zoroastrians have this element, too. But their scriptures do not contain explicit proto- Hitlerian passages.Replies: @Hibernian
I condemn this abhorrent promotion of antisemitic and racist hate in the strongest terms, which runs against our core values as Americans.
Wait, I didn’t say this. The President of the United States did.
I really don’t give a damn about Musk’s kerfuffle with the ADL but his unambiguous endorsement of a vile blood libel crossed the line.
What criticisms would be permitted? After all, the above crossed 'the line.' What is that line?
That wasn't a blood libel, it was a canard. Or maybe a trope. I can't remember, you guys have so many different flavors and categories of lies, how is a dumb goy supposed to keep up?
https://www.unz.com/isteve/confused-anti-semitic-muslim-terrorist-attacks-black-hebrew-israelite-facility/#comment-6250212Replies: @PhysicistDave
res wrote to me:
Well, I was not trying to really play off Hungarians vs. Ashkenazim, but merely make the point that of course they are both Europeans: everyone did consider my Hungarian-American classmate to be “White.”
I’ve actually seen conflicting reports on Ashkenazim DNA: I don’t think the science is really solid yet.
But I do have several friends from the Mideast: an Iranian neighbor, a Lebanese Christian restauranteur, etc.
And the Ashkenazi Jews I have known certainly look more similar to Europeans than to my Mideastern friends. Indeed, the Ashkenazim I have known look more similar to Western and Northern Europeans than the Greeks I have known. And, I hope that everyone agrees that the Greeks are Europeans!
In any case, the language, the culture, and the more than a millennium of residence do count, too.
I never thought that. Have you met Jews?
Nope.
Maybe, but I still stand by my statement. Indeed, you prove my point, even if you don’t realize it. Your replies to Jack and the Jew crew are simply different from whites.
The way you “talk” to Jack is different from whites. It’s subtle, but it’s there.
Jews’ mind tricks fall on deaf ears when used against non-whites. There’s an indifference with your comments to Jack that isn’t there with whites.
It’s fun to watch because Jack can’t see it. Jews are a remarkably talented people, but self-awareness isn’t exactly their strong suit.
Aren't you glad I am here? I am doing the anti-"Jew's mind tricks" job that (goyish white) Americans won't do! ;)
Note that you’re the one who wants to go at this this way. Jews: good and bad. Okay, we can start with the 22% of the Nobels…then go on to the negative contributions.
A long time ago, I suggested that absent Jews, we might be ten years behind where we are technologically — but in immeasurably better shape in innumerable other ways.
Do I want to be in 2023 America with all its problems — or in an America with two hundred million mostly white people, no such thing as ‘transgender’ individuals, a rational legal system, homosexuals confined to merely being tolerated, no Israeli ball ‘n chain, and blacks as no more than a somewhat unedifying minority — but saddled with 2013 technology?
Oh, that’s a toughie, Jack. Youall have done so much for us…
I tell ya, it's like he's trying very hard to live up to the stereotype of the shifty Jew who talks out of both sides of his mouth.
They did want friendly relations with white gentiles — until they decided our day was done, and it was time for another horse.
The Muslims and Poles had this experience long before us. Remember ‘Judeo-Christian values’?
Ah yes — but that was then. This is now.
Damn, Jack. Every single part of that is pure projection.
Anyway, the author, whoever it was, was recounting as a kid when he was talking with his little brother, who had asked (or "axed" LOL) the difference between Whites and jews. Older brother said
White people is all mean and stingy. If they more mean than stingy, they White. If they more stingy than mean, they jews.Replies: @Anonymous
It isn’t true though. Jews are more mean than Whites. Witness the jews’ murderous rampage in Palestine, or the nature of the myths they celebrate.
Wouldn't an English teacher know how to spell "repellent"?
https://twitter.com/jpodhoretz/status/903440382494728192Replies: @Colin Wright, @Poirot
Not the first time.
See Steve’s John Podhoretz problem—and ours. https://vdare.com/articles/podhoretz-junior-vs-steve-sailer
To further embrace diversity lets move to a millet system and cap social representation by race. Limit Whites to 58%, Blacks 13% etc.Replies: @Anonymous
What is a millet system?
It worked, sort of, from the viewpoint of the ruling elite.
But it did not lead to an open society that was free to make much progress. You want scientific/technological/economic/industrial progress, you really need freedom of association and equality before the law.
I think mc23's point is that we are losing all that.
https://rpl.hds.harvard.edu/faq/millet-systemMore at Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millet_(Ottoman_Empire)I don't associate the millet system with hard ethnic quotas though. Though the separate institutions might result in that to some degree. Anyone have evidence otherwise??P.S. An interesting modern example of a millet system.
The Israeli Millet System: Examining Legal Pluralism through Lenses of Nation-Building and Human Rights
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1731404Replies: @mc23
Wasn’t Fischer a mischling? Most of the great ones are.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobby_Fischer#Paul_Nem%C3%A9nyi_as_Fischer's_father
Tribal jews cannot tolerate friendly relations with White populations. Friendly relations lead to intermarriage, which some tribal jews have described as a holocaust.
It’s actually the more liberal cosmopolitan Jews who have the most venom for whites.
Ah, okay, so you want collective credit to the American Jews as a whole for the merits of the tiny, miniscule fraction of American Jews with scientific accomplishments?
Yes, let’s play that game.
Can we, then, assign collective demerits to the American Jews at large for the much larger fraction of American Jews who have been involved – nay, have been at the forefront – in socially destructive and deviant endeavors and movements such as homosexual “marriage,” secularization, radical feminism, disintegration of the nuclear family, socialism/communism, anarchism, pornography, degenerate popular culture/entertainment/art, financial malfeasance/fraud, rapacious corporatist regulatory capture, “multiculturalism,” mass-migration of Third World migrants with inability to assimilate, destruction of the European-Christian religious and social consensus, corruption of the legal system, elevation of victimhood (real or imagined), etc. etc. etc.?
No kidding. Jack D is apparently very eliminationist in his mindset. Hence his constant hectoring about “anti-Semites” and how they should be rendered penniless and driven from society and perhaps even massacred (in the case of Gazan women and children), you know, “to mow the lawn” once in a while.
His contempt and hatred of the gentile is just palpable.
So, of course, he projects this murderous hatred onto others and constantly refer to anyone who is critical of Jews as “anti-Semites” who are purportedly looking to launch another Holocaust.
But it’s very simple. I want Jews – like any other minority or immigrant group – to be grateful for the host country, be patriotic, think of their fellow citizens at large (and not just fellow Jews) and eventually assimilate into the general population and become indistinct from other citizens. Because, ultimately, that’s what’s good for everyone and the whole country.
But, no, that’s not what Jack D wants. He wants Jews to remain a distinct group, different from everyone else, and sit atop the political-economic hierarchy and lord over the rest of us, all the while evincing contempt and hatred toward us as being “unclean” and “inferior.” That’s why he plays variously “fellow whites,” “fellow immigrant-stock,” and “fellow persecuted minority” as convenience dictates and tries to split the normalist majority into contending sub-groups, because such fractured peoples are easier to control and dominate.
I don’t agree with AnotherDad on everything, but he is absolutely right to frame this shtick as minoritarianism, and Jews are at the vanguard of this destructive ideology. The sad thing is, I don’t think it will be good for ordinary Jews in the long run either.
Commenter Zelo said that MTV destroyed the fabric of America. It’s not exclusive. There can be other things that were also destructive.
MTV promoted Gansta Rap – I can hardly imagine a more baleful cultural influence. And of course the music business is – surprise, surprise – one of those businesses that is heavily influenced by members of a particular group that Art Deco and you will deny have such an influence (you because you stand up for your people and Art Deco because he’s a Boomer who has been culturally programmed to stand up for your people). Oh, and Johann Ricke too – I almost forgot your shadow.
They even look European.
Neither is true for African-Americans.
You may dislike Ashkenazi Jews, but they were as European as Ukrainians or Bulgarians.Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
European only in a geographic sense. Genetically, they are an inbred hybrid of Semite and European. So not “European” any more than an inbred tribe of mulattoes. The time factor is irrelevant due to endogamy.
“European” looking relative to Blacks, perhaps, but usually different enough to be visually distinct from actual Europeans of all nationalities. E.g. David Baddiel referenced above does not look European. He’s “99% Ashkenazi” and looks it. Perhaps you have “Mr. Magoo” visual perception.
The analogy stands. Genetically, both Baddiel and Gates both meet your above definition of European [bracket text mine] :
Skip Gates, whom you reject as racially European, or White, is as European as David Baddiel. You may argue that Semites are genetically closer to Europeans than Blacks, but they still ain’t European, even if hybridized in the endogamous group known as Ashkenazim.
I have my criticisms, but Knowledge Is Good is my point in this specific line of inquiry. Perhaps you don’t want to ‘believe’ genetics is real, and prefer obfuscation for personal/political reasons. But reality doesn’t care what you want to believe.
False. res corrects you on that:
https://www.unz.com/isteve/john-podhoretz-jews-are-not-white/#comment-6270497
Wait, I didn't say this. The President of the United States did.
I really don't give a damn about Musk's kerfuffle with the ADL but his unambiguous endorsement of a vile blood libel crossed the line.Replies: @Colin Wright, @The Germ Theory of Disease
Really? Said ‘vile blood libel’ consisted of the following remark:
Are we to take it that even the most valid criticism of some ‘Jewish communities’ constitutes a ‘vile blood libel’? After all, some Jews do positively wallow in anti-white gentile bigotry. Are we permitted to notice it when they do?
What criticisms would be permitted? After all, the above crossed ‘the line.’ What is that line?
https://www.unz.com/isteve/john-podhoretz-jews-are-not-white/#comment-6270497Replies: @Anonymous, @PhysicistDave
Are they really European in a geographic sense? They claim that Palestine is their geographic origin and regularly proclaim that they will reside in Jerusalem “next year.” Are they really rooted in Europe geographically?
Yes, or they were. Same as “BAME” in Britain are “British” in a geographic sense, without being Britons.
They were, until they were mostly uprooted in WWII. Current worldwide diaspora physical ‘rooted’ status is still stable, but looking increasingly shaky.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/john-podhoretz-jews-are-not-white/#comment-6270497Replies: @Anonymous, @PhysicistDave
Our silly little Jew-hater Jenner Ickham Errican wrote to me:
Most Europeans are “mulattoes” who are a racial mixture of steppe people (the proto-Indo-Europeans) and earlier Europeans. Maybe not the Basques.
So, unless you are pure Basque, you are a “mulatto,” just like the Ashkenazim.
And Semites are not a racial group. “Semitic” refers to a language group.
The Jew-hating goofball also wrote:
Notoriously, Jewish actors have often played Gentile characters and vice versa. Most people are often surprised when they learn that a particular public figure is of Jewish descent if they had not previously heard that or if the name is not a giveaway.
Yeah, yeah, I know: you can smell a Jew from a continent away! Right?
The Jew-hater also wrote:
Neither European nor Semite is a racial or biological term: the first is geographic, the second linguistic.
As I pointed out in my reply to res above, the Greeks I have known looked much, much more similar to the Mideasterners I have known than the Ashkenazi Jews I have known do. But I trust you agree that Greeks are Europeans. The Mizrahi Jews I have known of course looked Mideastern.
The goofball also wrote:
You seem to have lost your ability to read: what res actually wrote was:
He agreed with me, not you, and said so explicitly.
The Jew-hater also wrote:
Were Stalin and Hitler and Mao and Pol Pot all monsters because of genetic factors shared among all Georgians, Germans, Chinese, and Cambodians? Or just maybe were they evil individuals who had horrible beliefs and engaged in monstrously evil actions?
There is indeed a problem with (some) Jews and some aspects of Jewish culture, just as is true with some WASPs and some Arabs and some Russians, and on and on and on.
But those problems have to do with bad behavior and bad beliefs of (some) Jews (and some WASPs and some Arabs and so on), not with their racial composition.
Genetics does not work the way you think it does.
Does it ever occur to you that you and Jack D are mirror images of each other? That you are playing the same game but just on opposing teams?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_Jews#Genetic_origins :The above studies are genetic studies, not language studies.Citation needed. “People say”, or “everybody knows” is not an argument. Maybe you are friends with stupid people.Either Jews physically exist, or not. If they do, it stands to reason they are often identifiable on sight. The very concept of visual I.D. seems to make you nervous. Same as Jack D.That’s cute, but you’ve already implied you’re visually impaired. As such, your vague testimony on appearances is moot.He dismissed (with citation) your silly comparison with Hungarians, which is the point.Of course not: I always beat him in debate. If we were “mirror images”, according to your analogy, we would always end in a draw. Similarly, you and I are not mirror images because I’m whupping you right now as per standard practice.The above is some primo undergrad-level late night toke-smoke random philosophizin’ (exhale, Prof!), but irrelevant to the question if the Ashkenazi are biologically European or not.For a presumably ‘logical’ physicist, you are oddly dramatic. What “hate” are you ranting about? Are you simply projecting your own incoherent rage onto the rest of us? Chillax, bruh. If you calm down you might learn a thing or two. I'm here to help. :)Replies: @PhysicistDave
Pol Pot I don't know about, but Stalin and Hitler and Mao can all be seen to reflect cultural tendencies prevalent in the culture of their ancestors. Perhaps in unusually destructive ways, but...
For example, with Hitler, we get that typically Germanic absolute intellectual certainty and willingness to put a theoretical idea into practice without hesitation or qualification. In other contexts, that can be fine and noble; it didn't work out so well in 1933-45.
Perhaps Stalin wasn't such an oddity in Georgia; there's a positively evil Georgian Jewish politician in Israel who seems to share Stalin's belief that any problem can be solved with enough killing. Conversely, while Mao certainly managed to run up the body count, his style of leadership seems to have owed more to the East Asian tendency to govern through consensus and less to Stalin's brand of rule through sheer terror.
Most successful rulers seem to exemplify something in the national character. Has there ever been a more American president than Theodore Roosevelt? Kemal Ataturk strikes me as having been very, very Turkish. Wasn't Mussolini above all Italian?
...and when we contemplate Netanyahu's endless lying and clumsy attempts at manipulation, continuing without evidence of remorse or even greater refinement, what do we see?
Sure, one can cite exceptions, examples from other cultures: Not all mans be de same. I've had a Chinese lunatic pull a knife on me. Still, people do seem to conform to cultural, if not necessarily genetic, templates.
...and in regards to that last, I'll point you to Robert Plomin's Blueprint. Preferences in TV watching are genetically heritable.Replies: @Thea, @PhysicistDave
Anonymous[185] asked mc23:
It was the apartheid system for separate religious groups under the Ottoman Empire.
It worked, sort of, from the viewpoint of the ruling elite.
But it did not lead to an open society that was free to make much progress. You want scientific/technological/economic/industrial progress, you really need freedom of association and equality before the law.
I think mc23’s point is that we are losing all that.
Your incoherence is amusing. You’re describing three different groups of people. The only relevant one is which one was in Europe when the Ashkenazim manifested.
Not in the topic being discussed. Focus, please:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_Jews#Genetic_origins :
The above studies are genetic studies, not language studies.
Citation needed. “People say”, or “everybody knows” is not an argument. Maybe you are friends with stupid people.
Either Jews physically exist, or not. If they do, it stands to reason they are often identifiable on sight. The very concept of visual I.D. seems to make you nervous. Same as Jack D.
That’s cute, but you’ve already implied you’re visually impaired. As such, your vague testimony on appearances is moot.
He dismissed (with citation) your silly comparison with Hungarians, which is the point.
Of course not: I always beat him in debate. If we were “mirror images”, according to your analogy, we would always end in a draw. Similarly, you and I are not mirror images because I’m whupping you right now as per standard practice.
The above is some primo undergrad-level late night toke-smoke random philosophizin’ (exhale, Prof!), but irrelevant to the question if the Ashkenazi are biologically European or not.
For a presumably ‘logical’ physicist, you are oddly dramatic. What “hate” are you ranting about? Are you simply projecting your own incoherent rage onto the rest of us? Chillax, bruh. If you calm down you might learn a thing or two. I’m here to help. 🙂
Etc.
You are just being silly.
Jews are not an ethnic group. They are a religious group.
Have you ever seen pictures of Ethiopian Jews?
They are not members of the same biological racial group as Ashkenazim.
Read Shlomo Sand's The Invention of the Jewish People: Jews no more exist as a biological unity than Sri Lankan Buddhists and Japanese Buddhists are part of the same biological race.
Yes, you can distinguish Ashkenazim Jews genetically from Estonians, just as you can distinguish Irishmen from Englishmen genetically or Germans from French.
And Germans and French are probably more closely related to each other than either are to Great Russians.
But you want a natural dividing line between Jews and Europeans... because you hate Jews.
And that dividing line simply does not exist.
Ashkenazim are, quite obviously, more closely related to Germans or Italians than any of those groups are to Ethiopian Jews.
In any case, why draw the dividing line between Ashkenazim and other Europeans as opposed to Northern vs. Southern Europeans or Slavs vs. Germanic groups?
Because you hate the Jews and want a dividing line between you and them.
And that is pseudo-science and is really stupid.
It also evades the fact that the annoying or despicable aspects of (some) Jews and some aspects of Jewish culture and religion are behavioral and cultural, not genetic.
Your pseudo-scientific nonsense impedes honest discussion of those very real issues.
Our racist nutjob also wrote to me:Nobody is "biologically European."
The Sámi people are Europeans. The Turks who live in Istanbul are Europeans.
I trust you will agree they are not part of the same biological group as French and Germans?
The racist nutjob also wrote:Oh, did Jack D concede all those debates? Or which outside debate judge adjudged you the winner?
Let me guess: the judge was... Jenner Ickham Errican!
Do you see why I am laughing at you?
You and Jack D are two sides of the same coin because you both insist on viewing Jews as some collective whole. I have never seen Jack criticize a single action by a Jew or a single aspect of Jewish culture or religion: for Jack, Jews are one unified ball of goodness.
You, too, want to lump all Jews together: hence, your insistence that Ashkenazi Jews are not Europeans, that, to use your words, "Either Jews physically exist, or not." Jews do physically exist, just as pigs, mushrooms, and stalactites all physically exist.
But Jews are not all part of one identifiable biological group. Ashkenazim, Mizrahim, and Ethiopian Jews differ more from each other than Ashkenazim do from many other Europeans.
Ashkenazim are most assuredly a European ethnic group, for the very simple reason that they lived for a very, very long time in the geographical area known as Europe, share substantial DNA with other Europeans, and had a language and a culture closely related to other Europeans.
Those are just facts, but you will not face those facts because you are one sick racist who hates the Jews as a collective.
Which really is pretty damn sick.Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @MEH 0910
It’s somewhat more complicated than that.
Yes, Europeans are mixed and not that uniform themselves, but your claims are a bit too simplistic.
I agree that plenty of Greeks look Middle Eastern, and indeed plenty of them are Middle Eastern genetically (Anatolian Greeks, Cypriots), and all have significant Middle Eastern admixture.
However, plenty of Mizrahi Jews pass just fine as (Southern) European, and plenty of Ashkenazi ones (just like plenty of Southern Italians and Greeks and even other Southern Europeans) pass just fine as ordinary Levantines.
Ultimately, if Greeks and Finns are both white, but all Levantines and MENA Jews, as a whole, are not, it seems obvious that whiteness is in fact a social category. One that would look very different had the Middle East not become overwhelmingly Muslim. Indeed, Middle Eastern Christians weren’t treated differently in American society from Southern Europeans, though of course many are now attempting to retcon that out of American history.
So, the question is more about whether Jews (or whatever group is being discussed) are socially white than it is about physical appearance or genetic distances.
And then there are two parts to that: are they seen and treated as white by others, and do they see themselves as white and identify with other white people. You have to admit answering those questions isn’t really that simple.
Just to be clear, I’m not a white nationalist (if anything, I’m more likely to be accused of “trying to deconstruct whiteness”), nor do I think there’s anything wrong with not being white or not identifying with whiteness. The one thing I dislike is the hypocrisy and shameless retconning of actual history that is sometimes involved (not referring here to any ethnic group in particular, it’s basically anyone who feels they can get away with claiming some victimhood and benefitting from it).
So, Jews are indeed historically a Middle Eastern people- mostly. And Greeks are a European people- mostly. They tend to overlap in some areas, but the "genetic center of gravity" is different.
Of course, this is not about looks/phenotype.Replies: @Anonymous
If JIE and others just want to say, "I hate the Jews, so they are not Whites or Europeans! So there!"... well, whatever.
But, from a historical viewpoint, Ashkenazi Jews are factually a European ethnic group, in terms of their long residency in that geographic area, their DNA, their language, and their culture. European history without the Ashkenazim has a hole torn out of it, just as would be the case if you try to deny that the Swedes or Danes were Europeans.
Curiously, if you want to tear Icelanders out of European history, not much would change, though it seems pretty obvious that Icelanders are indeed European.
Anon also wrote:Yeah. If who is White or who is European is in the sames category as "So's youyr Mama!", well, who cares?
But if we are serious about European history, the Ashkenazim just are, in historical terms, a European ethnic group.
Which is why the claim that Zionism is a form of European colonialism is most certainly correct.
Facts do matter.
If only it was. He'd be much less harmful.Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
What’s hilarious is not Podhoretz’s typo, but the picture Steve posted.
Fair enough, but most of the population at large in Christian countries who are not specialist historians get the bulk of their ideas about middle eastern history from the Bible or from Hollywood.
Most people “know” that Moses led the Jews out of Egypt after a series of plagues and the parting of the Red Sea, that Joshua “fit the battle of Jericho”, that David killed Goliath with a stone, Samson brought the house down on the Philistines, Solomon ruled over a mighty empire, and that wicked Jewish (not actually Jewish) King Herod (or was it King Wenceslas?) killed all the Jewish boys under the age of 2 so as to kill off the Messiah who escaped the pogrom by being born in a stable where there was no registration of births (and who must have been the top student in his year at school due to lack of competition).
However ALL of these “known facts” are probably pure fiction.
Now that is just on the Western side of the religous curtain. God knows what the average person believes is true history on the Muslim side., or the Jewish side.
It is much like "Iliad".
And it would be a very good thing indeed if Christians learned the truth about all those matters.
By the way, I am not arguing for dogmatic atheism: I doubt that God exists, but it would not surprise me if it turned out I was wrong.
I just think, and I take it you agree, that we should simply start telling the truth about specific religious beliefs that are mistaken.
What I do find especially bizarre about the current situation is that many Jews who are themselves secular and often either agnostics or atheists are still imbued with the "We are the Chosen People of God!" and "God gave this land to me!" memes.
Jack D seems to be one such person, for example. Childhood indoctrination seems to be very hard to shake.
And a lot of people are dying because of those memes -- they really need to be exposed and ridiculed.
As to the Muslims... I'll just be polite and say that it looks to me as if their best days are behind them.
My old Israeli friend from grad school now lives and works in Silicon Valley and has become a US citizen.
A wise decision, I think.Replies: @Mr. Anon
But you didn’t see Jews as having both merits and demerits (like all groups and individuals). You scoffed that Jews had made ANY contribution. Seeing Jews as a unique group that has ONLY bad qualities is the sure mark of the antisemite.
I've written on Unz in the past that, since the Jewish Emancipation (before which Jews contributed little to the European civilization), Jews have had both outsized social influence and scientific accomplishments, but that, on the whole, their political, economic, and cultural influence - dominance in the case of the U.S. in the recent decades - has been damaging and negative.
By the way, keep using "antisemite" repeatedly. A word so wantonly and cheaply used is going to run out of its meaning and power rather quickly.Replies: @Jack D
I would compare it to past situations -- but there's really nothing to compare it to. Somebody who endorsed the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, or Imperial Japan would have been relatively harmless in comparison. After all, the influence of American Jews on behalf of Israel is effective.Replies: @Art Deco, @Buroaker
No, you’re an American who vociferously and uncritically supports a foreign country that is committing horrific warcrimes
==
The ‘war crimes’ do not exist outside your imagination.
Here is a short definition.
https://rpl.hds.harvard.edu/faq/millet-system
More at Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millet_(Ottoman_Empire)
I don’t associate the millet system with hard ethnic quotas though. Though the separate institutions might result in that to some degree. Anyone have evidence otherwise??
P.S. An interesting modern example of a millet system.
The Israeli Millet System: Examining Legal Pluralism through Lenses of Nation-Building and Human Rights
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1731404
Thanks for the link.
Jews have contributed to American society and are seldom problem neighbors. However, the political culture of secular Jews is something which one might critique and certain economic sectors with a large Jewish presence have been troublesome (the legal profession, casino banking, and Hollywood).
What makes Jews "troublesome" as a group is that they have a shifted IQ mean which, as an artifact of how normal distributions work, means that a very disproportionate % (maybe 10x their overall % of the population) of high IQ people are Jewish ( maybe 20% vs. 2% of the general population). This naturally concentrates them at the cutting edge of progress (such as AI) and the cutting edge is also the bleeding edge. There are a lot of people who know where their cheese is located in the existing maze and who are not happy when you rearrange the maze and move their cheese.Replies: @Art Deco
I acknowledge the contribution of both Jews and gentiles, of course.
And - you know - no matter how much water you carry for their tribe, they are never going to reward you.Replies: @Art Deco
Why are you replying to me? I didn’t write that.
==
You quoted it and endorsed it.
You’re probably right; but at least at the moment, if we do regard regard Jews as a collective and give you all credit for those Nobels won by a few, aren’t your negative contributions more striking than your positive ones?
The precise date could be debated, but let’s decide that Jews started having a significant influence on America about ninety years ago; with the Roosevelt administration. Over those ninety years, have Jews done more for America, or more to it? Okay, okay: sans Jews, we might have had to mount a conventional invasion of Japan, but does getting Facebook a few years sooner really make up for the transgender child, blacks running amok, come one come all immigration, the conversion of our legal system into an unusable monstrosity, etc?
I can see a US without Polish-Americans; better, worse? I dunno; without abusing or praising them, they’re alright. I can also see an America without Jews; I’m afraid it looks a hell of a lot better.
John Hay thought that it was hilarious that his good friend Henry Adams believed that every thing bad was the Jews' fault (he said that when Adams saw Vesuvius smoking, he looked for the Jew that was stoking the fire). It was a harmless sort of eccentricity in an otherwise fine gentleman, like not liking baseball or being a vegetarian or collecting erotic Japanese art. English gentlemen always had these weird little eccentricities and upper class Americans patterned themselves after the English. Even Henry Ford could be thought of a sort of harmless crank, because in America his nonsense never really led to pogroms.But after Auschwitz, this kind of stuff cannot be tolerated and Jews will fight it every which way they can, using whatever levers they can and are not going to apologize for doing so and are not going to wait until this horseshit becomes mainstream discourse. Frankfurter was afraid that if he confronted FDR over the Holocaust that Franklin would not longer invite him to the WH for cocktails ("that Felix is such a downer"). Now we know the consequences of not speaking up.Replies: @Buzz Mohawk, @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Jenner Ickham Errican
Your description of Jewish reaction is correct, but the funny thing is that no matter what they do they are not collectively smart enough to fix their public relations problem, which is growing by the hour.
It’s been mainstream discourse on Twitter and other social media for years. Now “the Jews” are a mainstream topic on all media. They’re losing their coveted elite campuses. It’s too late, Weimar Jack.
In addition to redlining the Negroes, FDR also Hol’accosted the Jews? Busy man!
Have Jews ever stopped speaking up? Maybe that’s what keeps drawing negative attention.
So far, though, the lesson doesn't seem to have sunk in. A few Jews express shame over Israel -- Einstein, among others -- but very few.
More likely you and others are overestimating white American hatred for Jews and the alleged “exposure” to the public of their apparent machinations of globalism and race replacement.
Certainly Gen Z is appalled at Israel’s recent conduct in Gaza. Doesn’t make them based or anti Semitic.Replies: @Art Deco, @Wokechoke, @Rick P
If something is really troublesome (e.g. selling crystal meth) then society should make it illegal. Until then, making movies or representing people with legal problems is not “troublesome”.
What makes Jews “troublesome” as a group is that they have a shifted IQ mean which, as an artifact of how normal distributions work, means that a very disproportionate % (maybe 10x their overall % of the population) of high IQ people are Jewish ( maybe 20% vs. 2% of the general population). This naturally concentrates them at the cutting edge of progress (such as AI) and the cutting edge is also the bleeding edge. There are a lot of people who know where their cheese is located in the existing maze and who are not happy when you rearrange the maze and move their cheese.
==
It's very peculiar to fancy that moral norms, manners, and the penal code should be coterminous.
==
Most lawyers do represent people with legal problems. Others are active participants in the invasion of public policy making by the courts. Others are abusers and scam artists. Still others benefit from rent-seeking, big time. There are lawyers and then there are lawyers.
==
Generating entertainment products can be a benign activity. Often it is not, and the culture surrounding their generation can as well be deeply corrupt. (See some of Michael Medved's critique of Hollywood's output, then ponder Harvey Weinstein).
==
We can say in a general way that the trajectory of American society since 1890 has been different than what it otherwise would have been and we can say that as well in re the trajectory of American society since 1965. What you cannot say with much assurance is that the trajectory has led to a more admirable and agreeable society. You don't want to be discourteous to anyone and say 'you damaged this place', but at the same time it is unwarranted to claim American society has been redeemed by 'diversity'. All we can do is negotiate our present and make the best decisions we can about the future.
==
It is grossly amusing that one of the world's more accomplished societies is on these boards the subject of fantasy-laden revulsion. Unz is a collecting pool of people who are kind of...unwell.Replies: @Jack D, @Mr. Anon
I would compare it to past situations -- but there's really nothing to compare it to. Somebody who endorsed the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, or Imperial Japan would have been relatively harmless in comparison. After all, the influence of American Jews on behalf of Israel is effective.Replies: @Art Deco, @Buroaker
Cultural PTSD may drive the meddling …
With all the focus on “mental health” funding, and the arrival of PTSD as bona fide eligible avenue for financial assistance…. It must be a real thing ..
Cultural PTSD, the gift that keeps on giving
Everyone gets to suffer,
“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”
Weren’t the Jews being addressed here Sephardim originally from the Iberian peninsula by way of the Caribbean, who have essentially all intermarried and assimilated into the United States? Those Sephardim in America seem to have kept up their end of the bargain by becoming in fact indistinguishable from other Americans over time. The was a negligible Ashkenazi presence in the U.S. at the time, correct? Did the Sephardim have outsized influence in Harvard, Yale, and Brown then and own a bulk of the newspapers then?
Notably, those Jews were in Rhode Island likely because that colony’s founder broke from Massachusetts which, common in colonial America and in the early Republic, had an established State Church.
Do you think that President Washington would have written the same thing to American Ashkenazis in the 2020s that he had written to the Sephardim of Rhode Island then?
https://rpl.hds.harvard.edu/faq/millet-systemMore at Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millet_(Ottoman_Empire)I don't associate the millet system with hard ethnic quotas though. Though the separate institutions might result in that to some degree. Anyone have evidence otherwise??P.S. An interesting modern example of a millet system.
The Israeli Millet System: Examining Legal Pluralism through Lenses of Nation-Building and Human Rights
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1731404Replies: @mc23
The Ottoman Empire abounded in nepotism but they didn’t have affirmative Action. That’ll be an American feature.
Thanks for the link.
One could argue that God allowed the Jews to create the abomination they have christened ‘Israel’ to chastise and humble them.
So far, though, the lesson doesn’t seem to have sunk in. A few Jews express shame over Israel — Einstein, among others — but very few.
“Do tell, how the Jews of America have merited the good will of their fellow citizens who are not Jews.”
JFC, grow up. There is a certain subset in the American population who hate Jews, at worst, or are not fans of them, at best, so they project that attitude onto the rest of normie population. As if we whites are in the same page with them when it’s likely we do not harbor those same feelings.
But the remarkable thing is that you and Jack are so sensitive to the point that you each play the victim card when it both suits you. How about you both go back?
Really. No foolin.' But that changed -- and now here I am. Moreover, although I live in Oregon, which you will agree is hardly likely to be a leading hotbed of antisemitism, whenever I voice my thoughts -- and of late, I have -- I encounter a surprising amount of agreement.
People know they're not supposed to be antisemitic; they don't wear little lapel pins to that effect. But they've noticed what I have noticed.Replies: @Twinkie
...and why shouldn't it be true? Can you explain why the Jews of Spain would have felt any especial loyalty to the Visigothic kingdom, or preferred its rule to that of the Muslims?
Let's face at least one fact: through at least about 1700, Jews were generally on Team Islam, not that of the Christians. This isn't bad or good; it's just the way it was.Replies: @mc23
Jews were allowed, under their own custom, to enter a mosque but forbidden to enter a Church.
They were enjoined to spit on or defile a cross. “In Prague’s Charles Bridge, there’s great crucifix surrounded by huge gilded Hebrew letters that spell the traditional Hebrew sanctification Kadosh Kadosh Kadosh Adonai Tzvaot, “Holy, Holy, Holy is the Lord of Hosts.”
It was done to keeps Jews from spitting on the cross. A Jew was accused of desecrating the crucifix. He could have been executed but instead the Jewish community was forced to pay for putting up the Hebrew words in gold letters.
In Israel Jews are still spitting on crosses. The Israeli government recently condemmed this but bad blood goes way back.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/oct/03/video-of-ultra-orthodox-jews-spitting-by-christians-in-jerusalem-sparks-outrage
“Now “the Jews” are a mainstream topic on all media. They’re losing their coveted elite campuses. It’s too late, Weimar Jack”
More likely you and others are overestimating white American hatred for Jews and the alleged “exposure” to the public of their apparent machinations of globalism and race replacement.
Certainly Gen Z is appalled at Israel’s recent conduct in Gaza. Doesn’t make them based or anti Semitic.
==
Your handlers should have told you not to use stupid constructions like this. (And it would be no defense of people born after 1996 even if it were true).Replies: @Corvinus
Also remember, these young anti-Israel communists do not hate Israel because it's pro-LGBT or whatever. They hate Israel because they are anti-white, and they consider Israel white.Replies: @Corvinus, @Colin Wright
The Muslims and Poles had this experience long before us. Remember 'Judeo-Christian values'?
Ah yes -- but that was then. This is now.Replies: @Anonymous
Many years ago I had a Greek friend in college and we would talk about things like this.
One day he said something that has stuck in my mind ever since: “Americans have never seen the Jew with his teeth bared.”
That may have been true 30+ years ago, but it sure isn’t anymore. Wherever you go on social media you see Jews verbally abusing Americans in the worst ways. Clearly they’ve decided that Americans are a dying people and have begun treating them with the same open contempt they’ve always treated weaker European nationalities.
Most people "know" that Moses led the Jews out of Egypt after a series of plagues and the parting of the Red Sea, that Joshua "fit the battle of Jericho", that David killed Goliath with a stone, Samson brought the house down on the Philistines, Solomon ruled over a mighty empire, and that wicked Jewish (not actually Jewish) King Herod (or was it King Wenceslas?) killed all the Jewish boys under the age of 2 so as to kill off the Messiah who escaped the pogrom by being born in a stable where there was no registration of births (and who must have been the top student in his year at school due to lack of competition).
However ALL of these "known facts" are probably pure fiction.
Now that is just on the Western side of the religous curtain. God knows what the average person believes is true history on the Muslim side., or the Jewish side.Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @PhysicistDave
These stories could contain a grain of truth, but we actually don’t know how much. David and Solomon almost certainly existed & were rulers of some small polities; even Moses could have existed- it is perhaps 50/50 chance for that. What is highly unlikely is that virtually all older characters, from Abraham to Joseph & others had been anything more than literary fictions.
It is much like “Iliad”.
“You scoffed that Jews had made ANY contribution. Seeing Jews as a unique group that has ONLY bad qualities is the sure mark of the antisemite.”
JFC, grow up. You act the same way! You scoff that blacks and non-whites have made ANY contribution to the American society. Seeing those groups as unique in that they ONLY have bad qualities is the sure mark of a “racist”.
See how that works, Jack?
My vague impression is that you are NOT a lawyer, only someone who claims to be in this fine opinion webzine. So, am I wholly “antisemitic” for merely offering up my opinion?
Israel is a long narrow country on the ocean with its long axis parallel to the ocean. Naval power hasn’t been much used in Israeli wars so far, but it’s good insurance against catastrophe. It also allows major American support with few American boots on the ground.
We’re much too pink faced not to be white.
This is a great approach if you 12 and are deciding who can come in your treehouse that will only fit 3 kids but the stupidest possible approach in a democracy where you want to get as many people as possible onto your side. Even if Hibernian's views are sympathetic to yours, he can't be in your little club anyway because he's not white enough. Then you will complain that too many (Catholics, Jews, etc.) vote Democrat - geez I wonder why?Replies: @Colin Wright, @Johann Ricke
What makes Jews "troublesome" as a group is that they have a shifted IQ mean which, as an artifact of how normal distributions work, means that a very disproportionate % (maybe 10x their overall % of the population) of high IQ people are Jewish ( maybe 20% vs. 2% of the general population). This naturally concentrates them at the cutting edge of progress (such as AI) and the cutting edge is also the bleeding edge. There are a lot of people who know where their cheese is located in the existing maze and who are not happy when you rearrange the maze and move their cheese.Replies: @Art Deco
If something is really troublesome (e.g. selling crystal meth) then society should make it illegal. Until then, making movies or representing people with legal problems is not “troublesome”.
==
It’s very peculiar to fancy that moral norms, manners, and the penal code should be coterminous.
==
Most lawyers do represent people with legal problems. Others are active participants in the invasion of public policy making by the courts. Others are abusers and scam artists. Still others benefit from rent-seeking, big time. There are lawyers and then there are lawyers.
==
Generating entertainment products can be a benign activity. Often it is not, and the culture surrounding their generation can as well be deeply corrupt. (See some of Michael Medved’s critique of Hollywood’s output, then ponder Harvey Weinstein).
==
We can say in a general way that the trajectory of American society since 1890 has been different than what it otherwise would have been and we can say that as well in re the trajectory of American society since 1965. What you cannot say with much assurance is that the trajectory has led to a more admirable and agreeable society. You don’t want to be discourteous to anyone and say ‘you damaged this place’, but at the same time it is unwarranted to claim American society has been redeemed by ‘diversity’. All we can do is negotiate our present and make the best decisions we can about the future.
==
It is grossly amusing that one of the world’s more accomplished societies is on these boards the subject of fantasy-laden revulsion. Unz is a collecting pool of people who are kind of…unwell.
And yes, for example the Civil Rights movement was redemption. Jim Crow was fundamentally unjust and a betrayal of the 14th Amendment and brought shame upon America in they eyes of history and the rest of the world. Fixing the racist quota system in the pre-1964 immigration laws was redemption. But again, Jews don't deserve either sole credit or sole blame for either of these things.
Immigration from the 3rd world has occurred in all Western countries since WWII (just ask Rishi Sunak) including ones that have few if any Jews and the Jews didn't create this situation. If you want to blame someone, blame Hitler and the Kaiser, who ground whole generations of white men into ashes and left a hole in Western Civilization that will never be filled.Replies: @Colin Wright, @Colin Wright, @Mr. Anon, @Art Deco, @The Anti-Gnostic
Oh, that's right - it's cucking for a people who hold you in contempt.
More likely you and others are overestimating white American hatred for Jews and the alleged “exposure” to the public of their apparent machinations of globalism and race replacement.
Certainly Gen Z is appalled at Israel’s recent conduct in Gaza. Doesn’t make them based or anti Semitic.Replies: @Art Deco, @Wokechoke, @Rick P
Certainly Gen Z is appalled at Israel’s recent conduct in Gaza. Doesn’t make them based or anti Semitic.
==
Your handlers should have told you not to use stupid constructions like this. (And it would be no defense of people born after 1996 even if it were true).
What I said is decidedly true.
Tell me, why do you seemingly carry Bibi’s water? Don’t you think for yourself, or is the Tribe too powerful for you to think independently for yourself? So, am I now an anti-Semite for daring to challenge you?
What ‘catastrophe’? You fancy King Abdullah will be sending the Jordanian Army over the river?
https://www.19fortyfive.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Aircraft-Carrier-1.jpg
(BTW, sink one, and you will have committed an act of war on the United States.)Replies: @Wokechoke, @Jack D, @Art Deco
No…but at the same time…
Pol Pot I don’t know about, but Stalin and Hitler and Mao can all be seen to reflect cultural tendencies prevalent in the culture of their ancestors. Perhaps in unusually destructive ways, but…
For example, with Hitler, we get that typically Germanic absolute intellectual certainty and willingness to put a theoretical idea into practice without hesitation or qualification. In other contexts, that can be fine and noble; it didn’t work out so well in 1933-45.
Perhaps Stalin wasn’t such an oddity in Georgia; there’s a positively evil Georgian Jewish politician in Israel who seems to share Stalin’s belief that any problem can be solved with enough killing. Conversely, while Mao certainly managed to run up the body count, his style of leadership seems to have owed more to the East Asian tendency to govern through consensus and less to Stalin’s brand of rule through sheer terror.
Most successful rulers seem to exemplify something in the national character. Has there ever been a more American president than Theodore Roosevelt? Kemal Ataturk strikes me as having been very, very Turkish. Wasn’t Mussolini above all Italian?
…and when we contemplate Netanyahu’s endless lying and clumsy attempts at manipulation, continuing without evidence of remorse or even greater refinement, what do we see?
Sure, one can cite exceptions, examples from other cultures: Not all mans be de same. I’ve had a Chinese lunatic pull a knife on me. Still, people do seem to conform to cultural, if not necessarily genetic, templates.
…and in regards to that last, I’ll point you to Robert Plomin’s Blueprint. Preferences in TV watching are genetically heritable.
And, yet, contemporary Scandinavians really are descended from the Vikings. Everyone knows that variations in behavior and character within a single ethnic group are huge. This is even (partially) understood from an evolutionary and game-theoretic framework: e.g., "evolutionarily stable strategies" -- "hawks and doves," and all that.
So, trying to reduce dangerous or immoral behavior by some country or ethnic group to genetic factors is just a scientific error. Culture, tradition, and ideologies are almost always the basis for truly horrific crimes by large groups of people, even if those may be slightly modulated in some ways by biology.
==
Yes it would have, had the black population increased 5.7-fold since 1890 while the white population increased by 16% (presuming no immigration).
==
Should note that in 1930, the number of people who listed their father as having been born in one of a menu of eastern and southern European countries was about 15 million (and that includes Germanophones in the Hapsburg dominions). Those listing their father as having been born in Canada, the British Isles, Scandinavia, Germany, the Low Countries, France, and Switzerland numbered about 18 million.Replies: @mc23
In the 1920 census they break out White Americans by Colonial stock versus immigrants and go so far as to list citzens as grandchildren of immigrants or later. Colonial stock was only around 45% of the Whites in the country at the time. (40.3 million)
Without immigration Blacks would have numbered about 24% of the population. In 1860 Blacks made up about 17% of the population. That numbers includes White immigrants so the ratio would always have been been higher versus founding stock. There’s reason to believe the ratio would always have hoovered around 4 to 1.
In 1920 those of immigrant stock numbered 53,000,000. Of those 16 million were from Ireland or Great Britain and 12 million from Germany. America was overwhelmingly a Northern European nation.
I will insist on objecting to the equation between Zionism and Hamas.
Hamas is — at worst — a movement of religious extremists who in a just world would be a problem to no one but the Palestinians themselves. At any rate, there’s no reason to think otherwise.
One can hardly say the same for Zionism.
BTW, I'm pretty sure that descendants of most Ellis Island whites such as the Irish and the Italians now vote for the Republican Party (as a NYT article once described, "from Tammany Hall to Build the Wall"). Except one group. Can you guess which one?Replies: @mc23
See my comments on the 1920 census in this thread. With no immigration at all the US would have been 76% White. With immigration the Black drops to around 10% and that’s close to the number of Italians and Poles.
No special term for criticism of Russians or Chinese or Arabs (who actually are Semites, unlike most Jews!) or, for that matter, Germans or French or Englishmen.
Why?
Jack, a while back I pointed out some of the really nasty aspects of Judaism -- e.g., the slaughter of the three thousand in Exodus 32 because they held the wrong religious views or YHWH's command for genocide against Amalek (1 Samuel 15) -- and you just went ballistic.
Why?
I've said many critical things about Christians, Ukrainians, Koreans, etc., all of which is permitted.
But not, it seems, the Jews.
Why?
Again: I have said many, many times that of course there are many decent, ethical Jews as well as many slimy contemptible Jews, just as the same can be said for Poles and Brazilians and any other ethnic group.
But offer a factually true criticism of (some) Jews or (some aspects of) Judaism, and that is "anti-Semitic."
Why?
Tell us why, Jack.Replies: @Jonathan Mason, @Hibernian
Racist of ten means a White person criticizing a Black person.
==
It's very peculiar to fancy that moral norms, manners, and the penal code should be coterminous.
==
Most lawyers do represent people with legal problems. Others are active participants in the invasion of public policy making by the courts. Others are abusers and scam artists. Still others benefit from rent-seeking, big time. There are lawyers and then there are lawyers.
==
Generating entertainment products can be a benign activity. Often it is not, and the culture surrounding their generation can as well be deeply corrupt. (See some of Michael Medved's critique of Hollywood's output, then ponder Harvey Weinstein).
==
We can say in a general way that the trajectory of American society since 1890 has been different than what it otherwise would have been and we can say that as well in re the trajectory of American society since 1965. What you cannot say with much assurance is that the trajectory has led to a more admirable and agreeable society. You don't want to be discourteous to anyone and say 'you damaged this place', but at the same time it is unwarranted to claim American society has been redeemed by 'diversity'. All we can do is negotiate our present and make the best decisions we can about the future.
==
It is grossly amusing that one of the world's more accomplished societies is on these boards the subject of fantasy-laden revulsion. Unz is a collecting pool of people who are kind of...unwell.Replies: @Jack D, @Mr. Anon
I would give the Jews maybe 20% credit for each, which leaves another 80% for everyone else. But to hear some people around here, the score is that Jews caused 100% of the damage and get zero credit for “redemption”.
And yes, for example the Civil Rights movement was redemption. Jim Crow was fundamentally unjust and a betrayal of the 14th Amendment and brought shame upon America in they eyes of history and the rest of the world. Fixing the racist quota system in the pre-1964 immigration laws was redemption. But again, Jews don’t deserve either sole credit or sole blame for either of these things.
Immigration from the 3rd world has occurred in all Western countries since WWII (just ask Rishi Sunak) including ones that have few if any Jews and the Jews didn’t create this situation. If you want to blame someone, blame Hitler and the Kaiser, who ground whole generations of white men into ashes and left a hole in Western Civilization that will never be filled.
Thanks for the blacks shooting holes in each other and terrorizing the rest of us. Thanks for the acres of urban ruin that were once the greatest cities in the Western World. Thanks for the lazy and incompetent doctors, clerks, and teachers. Thanks for the intellectual deadweight every corporation and university now has to drag around behind it. Thanks for all the jurors who will always vote to acquit if the defendant is black. Thanks for all the foolish young white girls seduced and then abandoned with a little mulatto monster. Thanks for all the unlivable communities, the useless functionaries, and the vast tax bills to care for it all.
Thanks, Jack. You really helped out. Another Nobel? Would that be suitable?
==
The quota system derived from the notion that people and peoples are not interchangeable. It's not condemnable per se unless having a nation is condemnable. (The quota system in question may have been inspired by mistaken premises, but that's a different issue). European countries and Canada have been getting a lesson in the last six weeks about what happens when your screens and your reception system is ill-considered.
==
As for Jim Crow laws, they were contrived, served no defensible purpose, and were insulting to boot. That having been said, the whole effort to remove them made use of tools and methods which have had disagreeable downstream consequences. Ditto the culture which attended their removal. Our professonal-managerial element keeps doubling down on stupid. No clue where the bottom is.Replies: @Cagey Beast, @Bardon Kaldian
Jim Crow was arguably unjust and, at least as importantly, unworkable. Title VII and related legislation, on the other hand, is completely repugnant to a free republic of self-ruling citizens.
More likely you and others are overestimating white American hatred for Jews and the alleged “exposure” to the public of their apparent machinations of globalism and race replacement.
Certainly Gen Z is appalled at Israel’s recent conduct in Gaza. Doesn’t make them based or anti Semitic.Replies: @Art Deco, @Wokechoke, @Rick P
Hating Israel and resenting Jewish special pleading in the US doesn’t make darkies the friend of whites. Basically the average darkie can hate on jews by pretending jews are White. So it’s mostly just resentment of Whites.
Iran, anyone? Hey, the major reason my country destroyed and fucked up several countries in that region is because they had grown and become potential threats to sacred Israel.
You are not qualified to pontificate about why my country positions its floating air-power bases anywhere.
No one but We can do this, and We now are doing it for Israel. I don’t think you know the power of an American aircraft carrier.
(BTW, sink one, and you will have committed an act of war on the United States.)
The Men of Unz seem to like appointing themselves to imaginary positions of super-citizenship that don't actually exist. The Vietnamese guy who just got sworn in as an American citizen last week is just as much an American citizen as you are.Replies: @Buzz Mohawk
==
Iran's going to run its troops clean across Iraq and Jordan? Or has it suddenly developed a bodacious air force?
=
Hey, the major reason my country destroyed and fucked up several countries in that region is because they had grown and become potential threats to sacred Israel.
==
We did not destroy any place, nor was any policy followed specifically (much less exclusively) to address Israel's security problems. (Israel remonstrated with the Bush Administration in 2001-02 to give priority to containing Iran, which is not what they did).
==
You are not qualified to pontificate about why my country positions its floating air-power bases anywhere.
==
You don't apply these rebukes to yourself, I see.Replies: @deep anonymous
A long time ago, I suggested that absent Jews, we might be ten years behind where we are technologically -- but in immeasurably better shape in innumerable other ways.
Do I want to be in 2023 America with all its problems -- or in an America with two hundred million mostly white people, no such thing as 'transgender' individuals, a rational legal system, homosexuals confined to merely being tolerated, no Israeli ball 'n chain, and blacks as no more than a somewhat unedifying minority -- but saddled with 2013 technology?
Oh, that's a toughie, Jack. Youall have done so much for us...Replies: @Wokechoke, @Twinkie
If Germany had simply been treated to a victory in 1940 and a settlement, they’d have landed on Mars by 1969. Von Braun would have been Moon Governor
https://www.19fortyfive.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Aircraft-Carrier-1.jpg
(BTW, sink one, and you will have committed an act of war on the United States.)Replies: @Wokechoke, @Jack D, @Art Deco
Although it’s also liable to be sunk. The retaliation for a sinking most likely a tactical nuke.
The real question is whether the genocidal parts of the Hebrew Bible are read by Jewish believers as something central or marginal. And this is a serious question, because NT -whatever one may think of it – is not a list of genocidal horror stories, unlike OT & Quran.
Historically, Christians were the ones who allegorized the Bible, not Jews (with a few exceptions like Philo Judaeus).
I don’t know much about how Jews interpreted those morally repellent passages throughout history. But, it remains a thorny issue. And one should also add that Christians adopted those stories & I am not aware they were morally outraged by those genocidal passages about Amalekites & other sanctified killings. Perhaps Gnostic Marcion was, post festum, morally right when he wanted all Christians to dump the entire Hebrew Bible.
Something can be gleaned from Paul’s attitude towards these stories. He is always talking about the Law & theological-spiritual topics, but never addresses “unpleasant”, genocidal parts. It could be – and I may be wrong here – that Jewish rabbis were selective readers, cherry-picking parts that could be justified by more or less universal conscience & skipping over the genocidal porn. And, on the other hand, they could have swallowed it all, hook, line & sinker, thus making historical Judaism a culture possessing a strong pathological, murderous exclusivity & genocidal hysterical lineaments.
This is a serious issue, because Dostoevsky had been justifying his anti-judaism by explicitly addressing those passages & rhetorically asking: what if Jews were numerically superior to Russians & had the upper hand- would they systematically murder them as they did all those peoples enumerated in the Hebrew Bible?
Being chosen is not such a big deal. I think Zoroastrians have this element, too. But their scriptures do not contain explicit proto- Hitlerian passages.
And yes, for example the Civil Rights movement was redemption. Jim Crow was fundamentally unjust and a betrayal of the 14th Amendment and brought shame upon America in they eyes of history and the rest of the world. Fixing the racist quota system in the pre-1964 immigration laws was redemption. But again, Jews don't deserve either sole credit or sole blame for either of these things.
Immigration from the 3rd world has occurred in all Western countries since WWII (just ask Rishi Sunak) including ones that have few if any Jews and the Jews didn't create this situation. If you want to blame someone, blame Hitler and the Kaiser, who ground whole generations of white men into ashes and left a hole in Western Civilization that will never be filled.Replies: @Colin Wright, @Colin Wright, @Mr. Anon, @Art Deco, @The Anti-Gnostic
There you go. Jim Crow, in principle, is probably the most humane yet practicable solution to the problem of what to do with a population that simply cannot be expected to live up to the same standards as the rest of us and cannot be accorded the same rights and liberties.
That’s the way it is. It’s unpleasant, but the truth of it doesn’t go away on that account.
So no, you didn’t do us a favor there. None of us. We had a working system, and you ‘fixed’ it.
And now you want us to thank you.
And yes, for example the Civil Rights movement was redemption. Jim Crow was fundamentally unjust and a betrayal of the 14th Amendment and brought shame upon America in they eyes of history and the rest of the world. Fixing the racist quota system in the pre-1964 immigration laws was redemption. But again, Jews don't deserve either sole credit or sole blame for either of these things.
Immigration from the 3rd world has occurred in all Western countries since WWII (just ask Rishi Sunak) including ones that have few if any Jews and the Jews didn't create this situation. If you want to blame someone, blame Hitler and the Kaiser, who ground whole generations of white men into ashes and left a hole in Western Civilization that will never be filled.Replies: @Colin Wright, @Colin Wright, @Mr. Anon, @Art Deco, @The Anti-Gnostic
Okay. We’ll thank you.
Thanks for the blacks shooting holes in each other and terrorizing the rest of us. Thanks for the acres of urban ruin that were once the greatest cities in the Western World. Thanks for the lazy and incompetent doctors, clerks, and teachers. Thanks for the intellectual deadweight every corporation and university now has to drag around behind it. Thanks for all the jurors who will always vote to acquit if the defendant is black. Thanks for all the foolish young white girls seduced and then abandoned with a little mulatto monster. Thanks for all the unlivable communities, the useless functionaries, and the vast tax bills to care for it all.
Thanks, Jack. You really helped out. Another Nobel? Would that be suitable?
At the time of writing genocide was not considered morally wrong, and it was somewhat equivalent to the myths about King Arthur and Robin Hood which boosted the morale of medieval Brits living through the Black Death and hoping to see a Merrie England again.
Unfortunately what the Jews never planned for was that these national foundation myths would be incorporated into the Christian Bible and spread across the world by missionaries who claimed that every word of the Bible was true.
Talk about being hoist by your own petard.Replies: @PhysicistDave, @YetAnotherAnon
“Jonathan Mason” – “what the Jews never planned for was that these national foundation myths would be incorporated into the Christian Bible and spread across the world by missionaries” – aka “when they wrote about genocide, the stupid Christians took them literally!”
Jack D – “once you accept the premise that [group X] are undermining and destroying your country, it’s a logical conclusion that you should kill them all, every last one of them”
==
You quoted it and endorsed it.Replies: @Mr. Anon
And he was right, and you are wrong.
==
It's very peculiar to fancy that moral norms, manners, and the penal code should be coterminous.
==
Most lawyers do represent people with legal problems. Others are active participants in the invasion of public policy making by the courts. Others are abusers and scam artists. Still others benefit from rent-seeking, big time. There are lawyers and then there are lawyers.
==
Generating entertainment products can be a benign activity. Often it is not, and the culture surrounding their generation can as well be deeply corrupt. (See some of Michael Medved's critique of Hollywood's output, then ponder Harvey Weinstein).
==
We can say in a general way that the trajectory of American society since 1890 has been different than what it otherwise would have been and we can say that as well in re the trajectory of American society since 1965. What you cannot say with much assurance is that the trajectory has led to a more admirable and agreeable society. You don't want to be discourteous to anyone and say 'you damaged this place', but at the same time it is unwarranted to claim American society has been redeemed by 'diversity'. All we can do is negotiate our present and make the best decisions we can about the future.
==
It is grossly amusing that one of the world's more accomplished societies is on these boards the subject of fantasy-laden revulsion. Unz is a collecting pool of people who are kind of...unwell.Replies: @Jack D, @Mr. Anon
You’re on here an awful lot. What is your “unwellness”?
Oh, that’s right – it’s cucking for a people who hold you in contempt.
https://www.19fortyfive.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Aircraft-Carrier-1.jpg
(BTW, sink one, and you will have committed an act of war on the United States.)Replies: @Wokechoke, @Jack D, @Art Deco
Sorry, am I missing something? Is AD not an American? Is he less American than you are?
The Men of Unz seem to like appointing themselves to imaginary positions of super-citizenship that don’t actually exist. The Vietnamese guy who just got sworn in as an American citizen last week is just as much an American citizen as you are.
And yes, for example the Civil Rights movement was redemption. Jim Crow was fundamentally unjust and a betrayal of the 14th Amendment and brought shame upon America in they eyes of history and the rest of the world. Fixing the racist quota system in the pre-1964 immigration laws was redemption. But again, Jews don't deserve either sole credit or sole blame for either of these things.
Immigration from the 3rd world has occurred in all Western countries since WWII (just ask Rishi Sunak) including ones that have few if any Jews and the Jews didn't create this situation. If you want to blame someone, blame Hitler and the Kaiser, who ground whole generations of white men into ashes and left a hole in Western Civilization that will never be filled.Replies: @Colin Wright, @Colin Wright, @Mr. Anon, @Art Deco, @The Anti-Gnostic
What a complete load of crap. The 1924 quota system was put in place by the founding stock of this nation to preserve, at least in some form, it’s ethnic makeup. Any people have a right to this.
YOUR people have done this in their own nation, you shameless hypocrite.
Emmanuel Cellar labored for 40 years to overturn the 1924 immigration law. It is why he ran for Congress and why he stayed in it for so long. And behind the scenes, in the Truman through Kennedy administrations there were Julius Edelson, Harry Rosenfield, Maxwell Rabb, Myer Feldman, Abba Schwartz, and Norbert Schlei. And then of course there was pressure from various organizations such as the ADL, the AJC, etc. It was largely a Jewish project, despite the handful of dumb Irishmen they got to front it.
The mainstream Jewish attitude was perfectly captured in 2018 by the NYT journofa Michelle Goldberg when she declared, "We Will Replace Them." Pure unadulterated evil. Kind of funny in a sick way when you'll recall that when the Unite the Right marchers chanted, just a year earlier, "We will not be replaced," all right-thinking people, Jew and Jewntile alike, scoffed that this was just a "conspiracy theory."
Only the words are American. So when they play it at the Olympics, there is no American content. Thanks again, Manny.Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic, @Mr. Anon
https://www.19fortyfive.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Aircraft-Carrier-1.jpg
(BTW, sink one, and you will have committed an act of war on the United States.)Replies: @Wokechoke, @Jack D, @Art Deco
Iran, anyone?
==
Iran’s going to run its troops clean across Iraq and Jordan? Or has it suddenly developed a bodacious air force?
=
Hey, the major reason my country destroyed and fucked up several countries in that region is because they had grown and become potential threats to sacred Israel.
==
We did not destroy any place, nor was any policy followed specifically (much less exclusively) to address Israel’s security problems. (Israel remonstrated with the Bush Administration in 2001-02 to give priority to containing Iran, which is not what they did).
==
You are not qualified to pontificate about why my country positions its floating air-power bases anywhere.
==
You don’t apply these rebukes to yourself, I see.
What are you talking about? The U.S. destroyed Iraq, and the Project for a New American Century (Jewish neocon personified) demanded that it be done a few years in advance of when it was perpetrated. IIRC they predicted that the Iraqi people would welcome the Americans as liberators. Didn't work out that way, did it?Replies: @Art Deco
By the time the Men of Unz are done deciding who is not white (Catholics are not white, Jews are not white, etc.) there are about 3 white people left in America and half the Men of Unz probably don’t even qualify to be in their little club (and if they do, their hapa kids, if any, don’t).
This is a great approach if you 12 and are deciding who can come in your treehouse that will only fit 3 kids but the stupidest possible approach in a democracy where you want to get as many people as possible onto your side. Even if Hibernian’s views are sympathetic to yours, he can’t be in your little club anyway because he’s not white enough. Then you will complain that too many (Catholics, Jews, etc.) vote Democrat – geez I wonder why?
The problem this idea ran into? All leadership cliques are coalitions of individuals - almost like athletic teams. They don't want people with the same backgrounds so much as they want people who can get it done and people they have come to trust. The reality is that in dynastic politics as in business, fathers will shiv sons and vice versa, siblings will shiv each other. So in the end, you had mixed coalitions of Arabs, Persians, Turks, Armenians and Kurds squaring off against each other.
Thank you, and that is exactly the kind of shit that goes on. Anyone pretending it doesn’t is ignorant or dishonest, or both.
And yes, for example the Civil Rights movement was redemption. Jim Crow was fundamentally unjust and a betrayal of the 14th Amendment and brought shame upon America in they eyes of history and the rest of the world. Fixing the racist quota system in the pre-1964 immigration laws was redemption. But again, Jews don't deserve either sole credit or sole blame for either of these things.
Immigration from the 3rd world has occurred in all Western countries since WWII (just ask Rishi Sunak) including ones that have few if any Jews and the Jews didn't create this situation. If you want to blame someone, blame Hitler and the Kaiser, who ground whole generations of white men into ashes and left a hole in Western Civilization that will never be filled.Replies: @Colin Wright, @Colin Wright, @Mr. Anon, @Art Deco, @The Anti-Gnostic
And yes, for example the Civil Rights movement was redemption. Jim Crow was fundamentally unjust and a betrayal of the 14th Amendment and brought shame upon America in they eyes of history and the rest of the world. Fixing the racist quota system in the pre-1964 immigration laws was redemption. But again, Jews don’t deserve either sole credit or sole blame for either of these things.
==
The quota system derived from the notion that people and peoples are not interchangeable. It’s not condemnable per se unless having a nation is condemnable. (The quota system in question may have been inspired by mistaken premises, but that’s a different issue). European countries and Canada have been getting a lesson in the last six weeks about what happens when your screens and your reception system is ill-considered.
==
As for Jim Crow laws, they were contrived, served no defensible purpose, and were insulting to boot. That having been said, the whole effort to remove them made use of tools and methods which have had disagreeable downstream consequences. Ditto the culture which attended their removal. Our professonal-managerial element keeps doubling down on stupid. No clue where the bottom is.
There are much more insulting laws in the world, as I write, especially in Islamic countries, but...?
==
The quota system derived from the notion that people and peoples are not interchangeable. It's not condemnable per se unless having a nation is condemnable. (The quota system in question may have been inspired by mistaken premises, but that's a different issue). European countries and Canada have been getting a lesson in the last six weeks about what happens when your screens and your reception system is ill-considered.
==
As for Jim Crow laws, they were contrived, served no defensible purpose, and were insulting to boot. That having been said, the whole effort to remove them made use of tools and methods which have had disagreeable downstream consequences. Ditto the culture which attended their removal. Our professonal-managerial element keeps doubling down on stupid. No clue where the bottom is.Replies: @Cagey Beast, @Bardon Kaldian
But the US has not? I really have to admire your American chauvinism.
Art Deco has quite a strange perspective on the US and the world. At least for someone who hangs around these parts. In 2023, no less.
More frequent commenters will know him better and probably have decided what his deal is (malevolent? just weirdly naive?), but I remain confused.Replies: @deep anonymous
“White,” according to almost all nonwhites, has three criteria: whitish or lightish skin (which Ashkenazi Jews objectively have, thanks to them like literally coming from Europe), connection to Western civilization (Jews by their own claims as well as plenty of objective cases have been civilizational belwethers for two centuries — according to them, they’re whiter than white), and some sort of arguable powerful or oppressor role (the criteria for this one being sufficiently fudgeable that there is no point in trying to rebut it no matter how perversely it is applied). In other words, this whole argument is a waste of time, and the only nonwhite who views Jews as not white is a paid employee who has been told what to say.
What’s more interesting is the Jews creating their own problem by legitimizing race grievance (as a weapon against “whites”) and never realizing it could easily be turned against them, and the Jews pushing race hate talk through woke oppressor/oppressed reasoning, and not seeing how that could blow up in their faces. That’s not Streisand effect, that’s Rube Goldberg effect.
According to Woke theory, only White Men have agency, but according to Men of Unz theory, only Jews have agency. Isn’t this insult to white Christians? White American men were the people who conquered the frontier and beat the Japs and the Germans and sent a man to the moon but somehow after 1964, Joos, a 2% minority in America, were able to lead them around by the nose and get them to do things against their own interest. Did they pay the Irishmen with whiskey? Get them drunk and pushed the voting button for them? How condescending can you be?
Deep State American citizens intertwined with glohoshlo interests
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/11/14/253026/
Possibly — had Hitler been another Bismarck and the Germany of 1940 that of 1870.
It’s unclear if either was the case. I’ll also point out that a clash between Germany and the Soviet Union in Eastern Europe may have proved unavoidable, in which case much if not necessarily all of the historical horrors would have ensued,
Finally, there’s the assumption that a humiliated France would have just gone quietly into that good night. After all, Germany reacted badly to Versailles 1919 — why would France have treated Versailles 1941 as a salutary lesson?
…and Hitler most definitely wanted a punitive peace with France.
Then — perhaps least tangibly but not thereby least importantly — Nazism was a dynamic, revolutionary movement. That’s both good and bad. It’s bad in the sense that revolutions don’t typically lead to calm and moderation. Wouldn’t Nazi Germany — having channeled all that energy into national endeavor — have kept endeavoring?
We can see the various negative consequences of not making peace in 1940. What we can’t see are whatever the negative consequences of making it might have been.
You’re basically correct, but I think I read somewhere that Norbert Schlei was not a Jew. But in any event, Prof. Kevin MacDonald thoroughly documented (The Culture of Critique) the decisive Jewish role in torpedoing U.S. immigration law in favor of Jewish interests and against those of native-born Whites.
The mainstream Jewish attitude was perfectly captured in 2018 by the NYT journofa Michelle Goldberg when she declared, “We Will Replace Them.” Pure unadulterated evil. Kind of funny in a sick way when you’ll recall that when the Unite the Right marchers chanted, just a year earlier, “We will not be replaced,” all right-thinking people, Jew and Jewntile alike, scoffed that this was just a “conspiracy theory.”
Including Wallonia and Włochy.
What? You’ve never heard of Włochy?
Also walnuts.
There's even a medieval gothic-type Hebrew font called "Vellish."
==
Iran's going to run its troops clean across Iraq and Jordan? Or has it suddenly developed a bodacious air force?
=
Hey, the major reason my country destroyed and fucked up several countries in that region is because they had grown and become potential threats to sacred Israel.
==
We did not destroy any place, nor was any policy followed specifically (much less exclusively) to address Israel's security problems. (Israel remonstrated with the Bush Administration in 2001-02 to give priority to containing Iran, which is not what they did).
==
You are not qualified to pontificate about why my country positions its floating air-power bases anywhere.
==
You don't apply these rebukes to yourself, I see.Replies: @deep anonymous
“We did not destroy any place, nor was any policy followed specifically (much less exclusively) to address Israel’s security problems.”
What are you talking about? The U.S. destroyed Iraq, and the Project for a New American Century (Jewish neocon personified) demanded that it be done a few years in advance of when it was perpetrated. IIRC they predicted that the Iraqi people would welcome the Americans as liberators. Didn’t work out that way, did it?
==
It did not. Iraq has been in parlous condition since 1958, with a short sane interval in 1964-68. If you fancy Iraq was in handsome condition in 2003, you know nothing. As for the death toll since then, if I'm not mistaken, the Iraq Body Count has estimated that about 15% is attributable to coalition forces and Iraqi state forces. There have been people working at making a wreck of Iraq, but it isn't us. The violence in Iraq has declined to a small fraction of what it was in 2017, so the place is now suffering security problems on the order of Ulster, ca. 1988, not an insurgency.
as late as 1966, there were 38 Jewish Labor MP 's~ 12% of the Parliamentary party whereas only a few Jewish Tory MPs eg Keith Joseph
But Jews are flexible strategists and moved right as sociialims was no more working in UK than in USSR. Plus Tories rated doughty as useful in Cold War 1. By Thatcher era , the ratios had flipped.Replies: @Art Deco, @Houston 1992
Commentary Magazine
After the war, the association between the Tory Party and prewar appeasement, indifference verging on hostility to the birth of the state of Israel, and occasional manifestations of anti-Semitism among its grassroots membership meant that many Jews continued to shun it. There were only two Jews on the Tory benches in the House of Commons in the 25 years between 1945 and 1970—as against, at its peak, 38 Jewish Labour MPs in 1966. During the 1970s, this began to shift: Further demographic changes within the Jewish community, Labour’s drift toward anti-Zionism, and the more meritocratic bent of the Conservative Party, begun under Prime Minister Ted Heath (1970–74) and accelerated by Thatcher, dramatically increased the number of Jews voting Tory and sitting on the party’s benches in parliament.
https://www.commentary.org/articles/robert-philpot/thatchers-jewish-brain-trust/
https://www.commentary.org/articles/robert-philpot/thatchers-jewish-brain-trust/
JFC, grow up. There is a certain subset in the American population who hate Jews, at worst, or are not fans of them, at best, so they project that attitude onto the rest of normie population. As if we whites are in the same page with them when it’s likely we do not harbor those same feelings.
But the remarkable thing is that you and Jack are so sensitive to the point that you each play the victim card when it both suits you. How about you both go back?Replies: @Colin Wright
You’d be surprised. Twenty five years ago I could have stated with perfect honesty that I was not antisemitic; I no more attached significance to Jewishness than I would have attached significance to detached earlobes.
Really. No foolin.’ But that changed — and now here I am. Moreover, although I live in Oregon, which you will agree is hardly likely to be a leading hotbed of antisemitism, whenever I voice my thoughts — and of late, I have — I encounter a surprising amount of agreement.
People know they’re not supposed to be antisemitic; they don’t wear little lapel pins to that effect. But they’ve noticed what I have noticed.
I was a philosemite when I was younger, largely because I bought into the media-constructed image of a persecuted, but plucky minority that made extraordinary accomplishments. But that image did not survive the repeated contacts with reality. Today, Jews are absolutely the most powerful, rich, and dominant minority in this country, but they still can't restrain themselves from elevating themselves as victims and libelously attacking the majority non-Jewish whites as oppressive racists all the while engaging in minoritarian tactics ("Let's go get the Christians, fellow non-Christian Hindus!").
As a recent example, I wrote of the following: https://www.unz.com/isteve/wapo-the-next-normal-states-will-recognize-multiparent-families/#comment-5150857And I am not the only ones to note this. I've discussed this change with my "normie" neighbors and friends, and, while they were not openly critical, they - almost to a person - rolled their eyes and evinced visible disapproval about what transpired.
I suspect there is a similar dynamic here to what's been happening with blacks. It's pretty obvious to many people that the black political salience is going to decline in the coming years as Hispanics and Asians have divergent and often opposing interests. So, I see the mass-hysteria about black "victimization" of late as a desperate attempt to codify black sacralization as much as possible while the political salience is still powerful. I suspect something similar is going on with the Jews. People are increasingly becoming aware of the confluence of negative elite dominance and Jewish preponderance in it, and Jews seems to be - hysterically - trying to whip up Jewish victimhood-elevation and sacralization while there is little coalesced opposition to them.Replies: @Rick P, @Corvinus
Because Micks are morons. Including Sen. Hart. Or so you say. Ever thought that they, too, might have a beef or two with the Anglo-Saxon? Even more so than the Jew?
You know what else he did? Outside of a Marylander or two (for hometown reasons), he did more than anyone else in Congress to have “The Star-Spangled Banner” imposed on us as the “official” national anthem. As if there was something wrong with the dozen or so unofficial, and much better, anthems we’d been using up until 1931.
Only the words are American. So when they play it at the Olympics, there is no American content. Thanks again, Manny.
Not going into the “whiteness” topic- from what I’ve read, Greeks are mostly European in genetic make-up, basically a continuation of Minoans & Mycenaeans. Jews, on the other hand, are mostly Middle Eastern, with some European ancestry added (“European” meaning those genes prevalent in what is now southern Europe).
So, Jews are indeed historically a Middle Eastern people- mostly. And Greeks are a European people- mostly. They tend to overlap in some areas, but the “genetic center of gravity” is different.
Of course, this is not about looks/phenotype.
Vlachs are an interesting phenomenon- or phenomena. I was interested in them, and it looks like this appellation may signify many things.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlachs_in_the_history_of_Croatia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlachs
Anyway- they didn’t care to form a nation in any meaningful sense.
==
The quota system derived from the notion that people and peoples are not interchangeable. It's not condemnable per se unless having a nation is condemnable. (The quota system in question may have been inspired by mistaken premises, but that's a different issue). European countries and Canada have been getting a lesson in the last six weeks about what happens when your screens and your reception system is ill-considered.
==
As for Jim Crow laws, they were contrived, served no defensible purpose, and were insulting to boot. That having been said, the whole effort to remove them made use of tools and methods which have had disagreeable downstream consequences. Ditto the culture which attended their removal. Our professonal-managerial element keeps doubling down on stupid. No clue where the bottom is.Replies: @Cagey Beast, @Bardon Kaldian
Jim Crow was insulting, but- what else to do? This was, in my opinion, one of those things in life where you choose between injustice & disaster. This was similar to the apartheid, and to legal nuances in Israel which are quasi-apartheid & which I do not object to. Through legal sophistry one frequently marginalizes one group, but one can’t do otherwise. It’s a matter of survival.
There are much more insulting laws in the world, as I write, especially in Islamic countries, but…?
==
Your handlers should have told you not to use stupid constructions like this. (And it would be no defense of people born after 1996 even if it were true).Replies: @Corvinus
“Your handlers should have told you not to use stupid constructions like this. (And it would be no defense of people born after 1996 even if it were true).”
What I said is decidedly true.
Tell me, why do you seemingly carry Bibi’s water? Don’t you think for yourself, or is the Tribe too powerful for you to think independently for yourself? So, am I now an anti-Semite for daring to challenge you?
That’s right Sailer, no attention can be brought to the nauseating hypocrisy of the “protected class” of commenters you coddle here. Jack and his sock puppets get to spew non stop anti white gaslighting day in and day out with instant moderation, but most attempts to throw it back in their face might hurt your legacy! Can’t have that!
So, Jews are indeed historically a Middle Eastern people- mostly. And Greeks are a European people- mostly. They tend to overlap in some areas, but the "genetic center of gravity" is different.
Of course, this is not about looks/phenotype.Replies: @Anonymous
Kind of. Mainlanders are also 20-25% Slavic, much as they hate to admit it. Even on a lot of the islands there’s a bit of Slavic ancestry (which arrived there in later migrations of Mainland Greeks to the islands).
And all of Southeastern Europe has some Anatolian admixture from the Roman era. Greece is no exception. I don’t know if you’ve ever tried a genetic calculator of some kind, but even in Croatia it’s something like 5-10% of people’s genetic makeup (so it was far more than that back in Croats’ Balkan ancestors before the Slavs – who are some 60% of the modern population’s genetic makeup – diluted it). You can apparently detect small traces of it all the way into Southern Germany.
Of course, Minoan & Mycenaean remains plot very far south themselves. It’s the later, Slavic admixture that pulls most modern Greeks so far away from the Middle East despite much of their other ancestry. The islanders (especially those from the least Slavic islands) are more relevant for the comparison. Of course, the Anatolian and Cypriot Greeks, too, but those groups are just straight up Middle Eastern, both genetically and geographically. Across the sea, Southern Italians are relevant as well.
https://www.science.org/content/article/greeks-really-do-have-near-mythical-origins-ancient-dna-reveals
The Greeks really do have near-mythical origins, ancient DNA reveals
Analysis connects Greeks to the famed Mycenaeans and Minoans
The Men of Unz seem to like appointing themselves to imaginary positions of super-citizenship that don't actually exist. The Vietnamese guy who just got sworn in as an American citizen last week is just as much an American citizen as you are.Replies: @Buzz Mohawk
You have a hair trigger, Jack. I did not say that Mr. Deco is not a citizen, only that he is not qualified on the subject of carrier placement. In his reply, he correctly intimated that I am not qualified either. All I really wanted to do was post a cool picture of an aircraft carrier.
Your reply, on the other hand, cleverly, as usual, draws a distracting, skew line away from the meat of my comment, which is that all of this American activity is for your favorite country.
As for American citizens, an increasing number of them are growing tired of listening to the likes of you. Even replying to you now feels like a waste of time. Maybe it’s time for the rest of us to ignore fellow citizens like you.
I should clarify, I’m referring to them being pulled far away from pre-Turkic Anatolia. Modern Turks aren’t good representatives of that Anatolia, due to their Turkic admixture.
“America is not like Hungary where to be fully “Hungarian” you have to be a white Catholic with a certain ancestry. Americans can be any race or religion or color.”
Orbán himself is not Catholic — he’s a member of Hungary’s Protestant minority (though his wife and I believe his children are Catholic).
There is really no way an Anglo-European or Slav can pass for African, East Asian, Amerindian, Subcontinental Asian, Pacific Islander, or Oz Aboriginal.
Likewise, nobody is going to mistake John Podhoretz, with his substantial R1b admixture, for a J1 or J2 Middle Easterner.
Mueller Weissman Rosenstein Schiff Nuland Elias …et al …ad nauseum …
Deep State American citizens intertwined with glohoshlo interests
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/11/14/253026/
The US is doing just great!
Art Deco has quite a strange perspective on the US and the world. At least for someone who hangs around these parts. In 2023, no less.
More frequent commenters will know him better and probably have decided what his deal is (malevolent? just weirdly naive?), but I remain confused.
You're not alone. He appears for some unknown reason to be a gentile who is rabidly pro-Israel and philo-Semitic. I don't care to speculate why, that is just my possibly flawed observation.
And yes, for example the Civil Rights movement was redemption. Jim Crow was fundamentally unjust and a betrayal of the 14th Amendment and brought shame upon America in they eyes of history and the rest of the world. Fixing the racist quota system in the pre-1964 immigration laws was redemption. But again, Jews don't deserve either sole credit or sole blame for either of these things.
Immigration from the 3rd world has occurred in all Western countries since WWII (just ask Rishi Sunak) including ones that have few if any Jews and the Jews didn't create this situation. If you want to blame someone, blame Hitler and the Kaiser, who ground whole generations of white men into ashes and left a hole in Western Civilization that will never be filled.Replies: @Colin Wright, @Colin Wright, @Mr. Anon, @Art Deco, @The Anti-Gnostic
Open Borders for Ukraine and Israel! Let me know how that works out. It should go without saying that the Anglo-Americans had the absolute and sovereign right to heavily bias immigration and naturalization in favor of ancestral northwestern Europeans. Ask the Southrons how importing cheaper, browner people to do menial labor worked out.
Jim Crow was arguably unjust and, at least as importantly, unworkable. Title VII and related legislation, on the other hand, is completely repugnant to a free republic of self-ruling citizens.
It’s remarkable to witness an instance of ethnocentric stupor. Sight, sound, all senses blocked; shut off entirely from reality.
Only the words are American. So when they play it at the Olympics, there is no American content. Thanks again, Manny.Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic, @Mr. Anon
Don’t even get me started on the absurd, incoherent, fascistic Pledge of Allegiance (from Anglo/Norman and socialist ideologue Francis Bellamy).
As for anthems, it's typical of the Anglosphere-- and perhaps much of the rest of the word-- that the official one is lame and other patriotic songs more popular. Can anyone north of the Equator begin to hum "Advance Australia Fair?" But everyone knows "Waltzing Matilda". " God Save the King" is okay, but pales before "Jerusalem" or "Rule Brittania".
"O Canada" is the best of the official lot, and only has "Alouette" for competition. However, that anthem was composed by a frog, and they know how to do it. (Ironically, he left for Boston.)
New Zealand? "Don't Dream, It's Over"?Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
Without getting into the broader question of your exchange, white Christians (and white non-believers from a Christian background) obviously are incredibly stupid. There really is no question about that. Whatever the provenance of the project, who else would willingly sign their own death warrant?
I’m sure you, of all people, are fully aware of that, Jack. You remark on white Christians’ shortcomings often enough.
Speaking as someone white and of Christian descent myself, there really is no insult contemptuous and condescending enough for the sorry lot that we are.
Just resort to outright lying, why don’t you? There is not even a pretense to your strawmen anymore. You’ve become increasingly hysterical of late, like some Zampolit who is losing ideological control of his unit.
I’ve written on Unz in the past that, since the Jewish Emancipation (before which Jews contributed little to the European civilization), Jews have had both outsized social influence and scientific accomplishments, but that, on the whole, their political, economic, and cultural influence – dominance in the case of the U.S. in the recent decades – has been damaging and negative.
By the way, keep using “antisemite” repeatedly. A word so wantonly and cheaply used is going to run out of its meaning and power rather quickly.
People here love to kvetch about the relatively modest aid that the US provides to Israel, but I don't think I've ever heard a word of complaint about our massive troop presence in Korea or the tens of thousands of American boys that died there. Why does Israel get all the attention?Replies: @Twinkie
Happens to people who have been coddled and sacralized and are thusly protected from criticism and self-reflection.
Really. No foolin.' But that changed -- and now here I am. Moreover, although I live in Oregon, which you will agree is hardly likely to be a leading hotbed of antisemitism, whenever I voice my thoughts -- and of late, I have -- I encounter a surprising amount of agreement.
People know they're not supposed to be antisemitic; they don't wear little lapel pins to that effect. But they've noticed what I have noticed.Replies: @Twinkie
100% agree.
I was a philosemite when I was younger, largely because I bought into the media-constructed image of a persecuted, but plucky minority that made extraordinary accomplishments. But that image did not survive the repeated contacts with reality. Today, Jews are absolutely the most powerful, rich, and dominant minority in this country, but they still can’t restrain themselves from elevating themselves as victims and libelously attacking the majority non-Jewish whites as oppressive racists all the while engaging in minoritarian tactics (“Let’s go get the Christians, fellow non-Christian Hindus!”).
As a recent example, I wrote of the following: https://www.unz.com/isteve/wapo-the-next-normal-states-will-recognize-multiparent-families/#comment-5150857
And I am not the only ones to note this. I’ve discussed this change with my “normie” neighbors and friends, and, while they were not openly critical, they – almost to a person – rolled their eyes and evinced visible disapproval about what transpired.
I suspect there is a similar dynamic here to what’s been happening with blacks. It’s pretty obvious to many people that the black political salience is going to decline in the coming years as Hispanics and Asians have divergent and often opposing interests. So, I see the mass-hysteria about black “victimization” of late as a desperate attempt to codify black sacralization as much as possible while the political salience is still powerful. I suspect something similar is going on with the Jews. People are increasingly becoming aware of the confluence of negative elite dominance and Jewish preponderance in it, and Jews seems to be – hysterically – trying to whip up Jewish victimhood-elevation and sacralization while there is little coalesced opposition to them.
So you buy into the media-constructed image of a devious group who by hook or by crook is fomenting anti-white hatred.
"Today, Jews are absolutely the most powerful, rich, and dominant minority in this country, but they still can’t restrain themselves from elevating themselves as victims and libelously attacking the majority non-Jewish whites as oppressive racists all the while engaging in minoritarian tactics"
The Alt Right can't restrain itself from elevating itself as victims and libelously attacking whites who have allegedly been hoodwinked by Jews into supporting the destruction of their own kind. See how that works, Twinks?
"And I am not the only ones to note this. I’ve discussed this change with my “normie” neighbors and friends, and, while they were not openly critical, they – almost to a person – rolled their eyes and evinced visible disapproval about what transpired."
Absolutely. Because you and they are of a similar mindset and experiences. It wasn't necessarily an epiphany on their part, that they realized that Jews purposely underminded them with propaganda, it is more like their (and your) confirmation bias coming into the fold.
I see the mass-hysteria about white “victimization” of late as a desperate attempt to codify whiteness as the end all and be all. That is, if whites do NOT subscribe to being 100 percent "pro-white", then they are deemed "enemies" and traitors by the Alt Right, who seem to be – hysterically – trying to whip up European victimhood-elevation and Anglo sacralization.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYPAvT-3Fvs
This is reasoned, measured, and well supported.Replies: @Twinkie, @vinteuil
Thanks for the link to this excellent talk by Prof. Gottfried. What he has to say about “the change in the view of the holocaust” beginning at 17:30 is just brilliant.
For some mysterious reason, way back in the ’60’s, the conventional view of the holocaust shifted from blaming it on those crazy neo-pagan Nietzsche-reading & Wagner-listening German Nationalists…to blaming it on white Christians.
I’ve known many Ashkenazi Jews with blue eyes.
Oh, come on now, Jack, you know what they did. They used money, their influence in the media, and played the “woe is us” card for the umpteenth time. The same card you routinely use here, whenever you’re doing your special pleading for your own tribe.
When I have to recite it– Scout meetings, KofC, school assemblies– I always say “to the republics…”– and have Article IV, Section 4 to back me up. “One nation” is harder to finesse. It was part of the Great Reconciliation, so the public embraced it, but it was never really true. But to any true American, that is a feature, not a bug.
As for anthems, it’s typical of the Anglosphere– and perhaps much of the rest of the word– that the official one is lame and other patriotic songs more popular. Can anyone north of the Equator begin to hum “Advance Australia Fair?” But everyone knows “Waltzing Matilda”. ” God Save the King” is okay, but pales before “Jerusalem” or “Rule Brittania”.
“O Canada” is the best of the official lot, and only has “Alouette” for competition. However, that anthem was composed by a frog, and they know how to do it. (Ironically, he left for Boston.)
New Zealand? “Don’t Dream, It’s Over”?
To the Gadsden Flag
Of the Thirteen States of America.
And to the Confederation for which it stands:
One Anglo-American Nation,
Under God,
With Liberty and Justice for all.Replies: @Corvinus
A long time ago, I suggested that absent Jews, we might be ten years behind where we are technologically -- but in immeasurably better shape in innumerable other ways.
Do I want to be in 2023 America with all its problems -- or in an America with two hundred million mostly white people, no such thing as 'transgender' individuals, a rational legal system, homosexuals confined to merely being tolerated, no Israeli ball 'n chain, and blacks as no more than a somewhat unedifying minority -- but saddled with 2013 technology?
Oh, that's a toughie, Jack. Youall have done so much for us...Replies: @Wokechoke, @Twinkie
Incorrect! Jack D is on record as stating that Jews who have had negative influences on the country are just individuals who happen to be Jews. But he’ll take credit for the Jewry for the scientific accomplishments. He is a hypocrite, pure and simple. He’ll make whatever arguments that suits his purposes, principles or consistency be damned. See how he treats Russian attacks on Ukrainian civilians vs. Israeli attacks on Gazan civilians.
I tell ya, it’s like he’s trying very hard to live up to the stereotype of the shifty Jew who talks out of both sides of his mouth.
Pol Pot I don't know about, but Stalin and Hitler and Mao can all be seen to reflect cultural tendencies prevalent in the culture of their ancestors. Perhaps in unusually destructive ways, but...
For example, with Hitler, we get that typically Germanic absolute intellectual certainty and willingness to put a theoretical idea into practice without hesitation or qualification. In other contexts, that can be fine and noble; it didn't work out so well in 1933-45.
Perhaps Stalin wasn't such an oddity in Georgia; there's a positively evil Georgian Jewish politician in Israel who seems to share Stalin's belief that any problem can be solved with enough killing. Conversely, while Mao certainly managed to run up the body count, his style of leadership seems to have owed more to the East Asian tendency to govern through consensus and less to Stalin's brand of rule through sheer terror.
Most successful rulers seem to exemplify something in the national character. Has there ever been a more American president than Theodore Roosevelt? Kemal Ataturk strikes me as having been very, very Turkish. Wasn't Mussolini above all Italian?
...and when we contemplate Netanyahu's endless lying and clumsy attempts at manipulation, continuing without evidence of remorse or even greater refinement, what do we see?
Sure, one can cite exceptions, examples from other cultures: Not all mans be de same. I've had a Chinese lunatic pull a knife on me. Still, people do seem to conform to cultural, if not necessarily genetic, templates.
...and in regards to that last, I'll point you to Robert Plomin's Blueprint. Preferences in TV watching are genetically heritable.Replies: @Thea, @PhysicistDave
Pol Pot was of Chinese descent as were many of the upper echelons of the Khmer Rouge. They used the term Khmer to deliberately obfuscate people into believing they were just your average Cambodians.
The Chinese were the middlemen minority of Kampuchea.
Maybe, maybe not.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobby_Fischer#Paul_Nem%C3%A9nyi_as_Fischer’s_father
As for anthems, it's typical of the Anglosphere-- and perhaps much of the rest of the word-- that the official one is lame and other patriotic songs more popular. Can anyone north of the Equator begin to hum "Advance Australia Fair?" But everyone knows "Waltzing Matilda". " God Save the King" is okay, but pales before "Jerusalem" or "Rule Brittania".
"O Canada" is the best of the official lot, and only has "Alouette" for competition. However, that anthem was composed by a frog, and they know how to do it. (Ironically, he left for Boston.)
New Zealand? "Don't Dream, It's Over"?Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
I pledge allegiance
To the Gadsden Flag
Of the Thirteen States of America.
And to the Confederation for which it stands:
One Anglo-American Nation,
Under God,
With Liberty and Justice for all.
“This, then, is where I am; it is not exactly where I think all other white liberals are, but it cannot be so very far away either. And it is because I am convinced that we white Americans are—for whatever reason, it no longer matters—so twisted and sick in our feelings about Negroes that I despair of the present push toward integration
https://www.commentary.org/articles/norman-podhoretz/my-negro-problem-and-ours/
Norman Podohoretz
This is a great approach if you 12 and are deciding who can come in your treehouse that will only fit 3 kids but the stupidest possible approach in a democracy where you want to get as many people as possible onto your side. Even if Hibernian's views are sympathetic to yours, he can't be in your little club anyway because he's not white enough. Then you will complain that too many (Catholics, Jews, etc.) vote Democrat - geez I wonder why?Replies: @Colin Wright, @Johann Ricke
What’s a straw man on acid, Jack?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_Jews#Genetic_origins :The above studies are genetic studies, not language studies.Citation needed. “People say”, or “everybody knows” is not an argument. Maybe you are friends with stupid people.Either Jews physically exist, or not. If they do, it stands to reason they are often identifiable on sight. The very concept of visual I.D. seems to make you nervous. Same as Jack D.That’s cute, but you’ve already implied you’re visually impaired. As such, your vague testimony on appearances is moot.He dismissed (with citation) your silly comparison with Hungarians, which is the point.Of course not: I always beat him in debate. If we were “mirror images”, according to your analogy, we would always end in a draw. Similarly, you and I are not mirror images because I’m whupping you right now as per standard practice.The above is some primo undergrad-level late night toke-smoke random philosophizin’ (exhale, Prof!), but irrelevant to the question if the Ashkenazi are biologically European or not.For a presumably ‘logical’ physicist, you are oddly dramatic. What “hate” are you ranting about? Are you simply projecting your own incoherent rage onto the rest of us? Chillax, bruh. If you calm down you might learn a thing or two. I'm here to help. :)Replies: @PhysicistDave
Our racist nutjob wrote to me:
Either guys whose last names are “Errican” exist or they do not. Either guys with six fingers exist or they do not.
Etc.
You are just being silly.
Jews are not an ethnic group. They are a religious group.
Have you ever seen pictures of Ethiopian Jews?
They are not members of the same biological racial group as Ashkenazim.
Read Shlomo Sand’s The Invention of the Jewish People: Jews no more exist as a biological unity than Sri Lankan Buddhists and Japanese Buddhists are part of the same biological race.
Yes, you can distinguish Ashkenazim Jews genetically from Estonians, just as you can distinguish Irishmen from Englishmen genetically or Germans from French.
And Germans and French are probably more closely related to each other than either are to Great Russians.
But you want a natural dividing line between Jews and Europeans… because you hate Jews.
And that dividing line simply does not exist.
Ashkenazim are, quite obviously, more closely related to Germans or Italians than any of those groups are to Ethiopian Jews.
In any case, why draw the dividing line between Ashkenazim and other Europeans as opposed to Northern vs. Southern Europeans or Slavs vs. Germanic groups?
Because you hate the Jews and want a dividing line between you and them.
And that is pseudo-science and is really stupid.
It also evades the fact that the annoying or despicable aspects of (some) Jews and some aspects of Jewish culture and religion are behavioral and cultural, not genetic.
Your pseudo-scientific nonsense impedes honest discussion of those very real issues.
Our racist nutjob also wrote to me:
Nobody is “biologically European.”
The Sámi people are Europeans. The Turks who live in Istanbul are Europeans.
I trust you will agree they are not part of the same biological group as French and Germans?
The racist nutjob also wrote:
Oh, did Jack D concede all those debates? Or which outside debate judge adjudged you the winner?
Let me guess: the judge was… Jenner Ickham Errican!
Do you see why I am laughing at you?
You and Jack D are two sides of the same coin because you both insist on viewing Jews as some collective whole. I have never seen Jack criticize a single action by a Jew or a single aspect of Jewish culture or religion: for Jack, Jews are one unified ball of goodness.
You, too, want to lump all Jews together: hence, your insistence that Ashkenazi Jews are not Europeans, that, to use your words, “Either Jews physically exist, or not.” Jews do physically exist, just as pigs, mushrooms, and stalactites all physically exist.
But Jews are not all part of one identifiable biological group. Ashkenazim, Mizrahim, and Ethiopian Jews differ more from each other than Ashkenazim do from many other Europeans.
Ashkenazim are most assuredly a European ethnic group, for the very simple reason that they lived for a very, very long time in the geographical area known as Europe, share substantial DNA with other Europeans, and had a language and a culture closely related to other Europeans.
Those are just facts, but you will not face those facts because you are one sick racist who hates the Jews as a collective.
Which really is pretty damn sick.
Dude, stick to science. You don't sound like a ninny when you talk about science.Replies: @PhysicistDave
Beyond that, is that Ashkenazi genetic difference due in part to their substantial Levantine/Semitic (i.e. non-European) biological inheritance? If so, they are, by definition, only part-European hybrids, genetically, like Skip Gates is a similar hybrid. Whom you don't accept as European-American. You complain a lot about racism, but it seems you're racist against mulattoes in America. What gives, prof?Replies: @Mike Tre
Speaking of humor, here is a pretty funny hypothetical conversation between George W. Bush and Condoleezza Rice back when Bush was still US President:
We take you now to the Oval Office, as Condoleeza Rice enters …
George: Condi! Nice to see you. What’s happening?
Condi: Sir, I have the report here about the new leader of China.
George: Great. Lay it on me.
Condi: Hu is the new leader of China.
George: That’s what I want to know.
Condi: That’s what I’m telling you.
George: That’s what I’m asking you. Who is the new leader of China?
Condi: Yes.
George: I mean the fellow’s name.
Condi: Hu.
George: The guy in China.
Condi: Hu.
George: The new leader of China.
Condi: Hu.
George: The Chinaman!
Condi: Hu is leading China.
George: Now whaddya’ asking me for?
Condi: I’m telling you Hu is leading China.
George: Well, I’m asking you. Who is leading China?
Condi: That’s the man’s name.
George: That’s who’s name?
Condi: Yes.
George: Will you or will you not tell me the name of the new leader of China?
Condi: Yes, sir.
George: Yassir? Yassir Arafat is in China? I thought he was in the Middle East.
Condi: That’s correct.
George: Then who is in China?
Condi: Yes, sir.
George: Yassir is in China?
Condi: No, sir.
George: Then who is?
Condi: Yes, sir.
George: Yassir?
Condi: No, sir.
George: Look, Condi. I need to know the name of the new leader of China. Get me the Secretary General of the U.N. on the phone.
Condi: Kofi?
George: No, thanks.
Condi: You want Kofi?
George: No.
Condi: You don’t want Kofi.
George: No. But now that you mention it, I could use a glass of milk. And then get me the U.N.
Condi: Yes, sir.
George: Not Yassir! The guy at the U.N.
Condi: Kofi?
George: Milk! Will you please make the call?
Condi: And call who?
George: Who is the guy at the U.N.?
Condi: Hu is the guy in China.
George: Will you stay out of China?!
Condi: Yes, sir.
George: And stay out of the Middle East! Just get me the guy at the U.N.
Condi: Kofi.
George: All right! With cream and two sugars. Now get on the phone.
Condi: (picking up the phone) Rice, here.
George: Rice? Good idea. And a couple of egg rolls, too. Maybe we should send some to the guy in China. And the Middle East. Can you get Chinese food in the Middle East?
Anonymous[290] wrote to me:
Well, I suppose that you can argue that who counts as “White” and who counts as “European” is just like who counts as “yucky” vs. who counts as “cool” — it’s just a matter of who can impose his views on others.
If JIE and others just want to say, “I hate the Jews, so they are not Whites or Europeans! So there!”… well, whatever.
But, from a historical viewpoint, Ashkenazi Jews are factually a European ethnic group, in terms of their long residency in that geographic area, their DNA, their language, and their culture. European history without the Ashkenazim has a hole torn out of it, just as would be the case if you try to deny that the Swedes or Danes were Europeans.
Curiously, if you want to tear Icelanders out of European history, not much would change, though it seems pretty obvious that Icelanders are indeed European.
Anon also wrote:
Yeah. If who is White or who is European is in the sames category as “So’s youyr Mama!”, well, who cares?
But if we are serious about European history, the Ashkenazim just are, in historical terms, a European ethnic group.
Which is why the claim that Zionism is a form of European colonialism is most certainly correct.
Facts do matter.
Wait, I didn't say this. The President of the United States did.
I really don't give a damn about Musk's kerfuffle with the ADL but his unambiguous endorsement of a vile blood libel crossed the line.Replies: @Colin Wright, @The Germ Theory of Disease
“I really don’t give a damn about Musk’s kerfuffle with the ADL but his unambiguous endorsement of a vile blood libel crossed the line.”
That wasn’t a blood libel, it was a canard. Or maybe a trope. I can’t remember, you guys have so many different flavors and categories of lies, how is a dumb goy supposed to keep up?
Yet the most tribal Jews tend to be more conservative. They may not want friendly relationships with whites, but they don’t seem particularly anti-white.
It’s actually the more liberal cosmopolitan Jews who have the most venom for whites.
Most people "know" that Moses led the Jews out of Egypt after a series of plagues and the parting of the Red Sea, that Joshua "fit the battle of Jericho", that David killed Goliath with a stone, Samson brought the house down on the Philistines, Solomon ruled over a mighty empire, and that wicked Jewish (not actually Jewish) King Herod (or was it King Wenceslas?) killed all the Jewish boys under the age of 2 so as to kill off the Messiah who escaped the pogrom by being born in a stable where there was no registration of births (and who must have been the top student in his year at school due to lack of competition).
However ALL of these "known facts" are probably pure fiction.
Now that is just on the Western side of the religous curtain. God knows what the average person believes is true history on the Muslim side., or the Jewish side.Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @PhysicistDave
Jonathan Mason wrote to me:
Indeed.
And it would be a very good thing indeed if Christians learned the truth about all those matters.
By the way, I am not arguing for dogmatic atheism: I doubt that God exists, but it would not surprise me if it turned out I was wrong.
I just think, and I take it you agree, that we should simply start telling the truth about specific religious beliefs that are mistaken.
What I do find especially bizarre about the current situation is that many Jews who are themselves secular and often either agnostics or atheists are still imbued with the “We are the Chosen People of God!” and “God gave this land to me!” memes.
Jack D seems to be one such person, for example. Childhood indoctrination seems to be very hard to shake.
And a lot of people are dying because of those memes — they really need to be exposed and ridiculed.
As to the Muslims… I’ll just be polite and say that it looks to me as if their best days are behind them.
My old Israeli friend from grad school now lives and works in Silicon Valley and has become a US citizen.
A wise decision, I think.
Says a guy who never served, and has no idea how integrated military forces operate.
Etc.
You are just being silly.
Jews are not an ethnic group. They are a religious group.
Have you ever seen pictures of Ethiopian Jews?
They are not members of the same biological racial group as Ashkenazim.
Read Shlomo Sand's The Invention of the Jewish People: Jews no more exist as a biological unity than Sri Lankan Buddhists and Japanese Buddhists are part of the same biological race.
Yes, you can distinguish Ashkenazim Jews genetically from Estonians, just as you can distinguish Irishmen from Englishmen genetically or Germans from French.
And Germans and French are probably more closely related to each other than either are to Great Russians.
But you want a natural dividing line between Jews and Europeans... because you hate Jews.
And that dividing line simply does not exist.
Ashkenazim are, quite obviously, more closely related to Germans or Italians than any of those groups are to Ethiopian Jews.
In any case, why draw the dividing line between Ashkenazim and other Europeans as opposed to Northern vs. Southern Europeans or Slavs vs. Germanic groups?
Because you hate the Jews and want a dividing line between you and them.
And that is pseudo-science and is really stupid.
It also evades the fact that the annoying or despicable aspects of (some) Jews and some aspects of Jewish culture and religion are behavioral and cultural, not genetic.
Your pseudo-scientific nonsense impedes honest discussion of those very real issues.
Our racist nutjob also wrote to me:Nobody is "biologically European."
The Sámi people are Europeans. The Turks who live in Istanbul are Europeans.
I trust you will agree they are not part of the same biological group as French and Germans?
The racist nutjob also wrote:Oh, did Jack D concede all those debates? Or which outside debate judge adjudged you the winner?
Let me guess: the judge was... Jenner Ickham Errican!
Do you see why I am laughing at you?
You and Jack D are two sides of the same coin because you both insist on viewing Jews as some collective whole. I have never seen Jack criticize a single action by a Jew or a single aspect of Jewish culture or religion: for Jack, Jews are one unified ball of goodness.
You, too, want to lump all Jews together: hence, your insistence that Ashkenazi Jews are not Europeans, that, to use your words, "Either Jews physically exist, or not." Jews do physically exist, just as pigs, mushrooms, and stalactites all physically exist.
But Jews are not all part of one identifiable biological group. Ashkenazim, Mizrahim, and Ethiopian Jews differ more from each other than Ashkenazim do from many other Europeans.
Ashkenazim are most assuredly a European ethnic group, for the very simple reason that they lived for a very, very long time in the geographical area known as Europe, share substantial DNA with other Europeans, and had a language and a culture closely related to other Europeans.
Those are just facts, but you will not face those facts because you are one sick racist who hates the Jews as a collective.
Which really is pretty damn sick.Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @MEH 0910
“The Sámi people are Europeans. The Turks who live in Istanbul are Europeans.”
Dude, stick to science. You don’t sound like a ninny when you talk about science.
The point is that there is no biological, scientific sense of "Europeans." It is a geographical term, and the Sámi people and the Turks who live in Istanbul are indeed, geographically, European.
It is reasonable to interpret the term "European" in a non-geographic sense to mean people whose language, culture, etc. are related to other Europeans. And then the Ashkenazi are indeed Europeans.
What I am objecting to is the pseudo-science peddled by JIE that, in some biological sense, the Ashkenazim are not Europeans but certain privileged groups JIE likes (not, I imagine, the Sámi people and the Turks who live in Istanbul!) are biological Europeans.
That is pseudo-scientific nonsense, and, speaking as a scientist, I have standing to point that out.
I take it that you too embrace that pseudo-scientific nonsense?
If so, give it up -- it's embarrassing.
Don’t indulge Jack D with the whole “Magical Jews” narrative. They weren’t necessary to creating the atomic bomb anymore than Germans were necessary for creating rockets or Scotsmen were for creating the steam engine.
Inventing something requires clever, capable people. They can be Jews, or Germans, or Scotsmen, or Russians, or Frenchmen, or Italians, or Hungarians (the cleverest of all clever people).
Physics is physics. It doesn’t respect ethnicity.
Reportedly, they all attended the same high school in Budapest.
So, figure out how to replicate that milieu and do you get a genius factory?
And it would be a very good thing indeed if Christians learned the truth about all those matters.
By the way, I am not arguing for dogmatic atheism: I doubt that God exists, but it would not surprise me if it turned out I was wrong.
I just think, and I take it you agree, that we should simply start telling the truth about specific religious beliefs that are mistaken.
What I do find especially bizarre about the current situation is that many Jews who are themselves secular and often either agnostics or atheists are still imbued with the "We are the Chosen People of God!" and "God gave this land to me!" memes.
Jack D seems to be one such person, for example. Childhood indoctrination seems to be very hard to shake.
And a lot of people are dying because of those memes -- they really need to be exposed and ridiculed.
As to the Muslims... I'll just be polite and say that it looks to me as if their best days are behind them.
My old Israeli friend from grad school now lives and works in Silicon Valley and has become a US citizen.
A wise decision, I think.Replies: @Mr. Anon
As Wolfgang Pauli said about Paul Dirac: “There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.”
Only the words are American. So when they play it at the Olympics, there is no American content. Thanks again, Manny.Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic, @Mr. Anon
has to be the all-time worst national anthem in the World, ever.
America’s national anthem should be, either:
America the Beautiful
or
Living in America
Nah, the Germans could have had the atomic and nuclear bombs first if they hadn’t thrown out their Jewish scientists.
After some trolls in Madison (where else?) published the recipe, anyone could do it, provided his grocer had all the right ingredients.
United States v. Progressive Inc. (W.D. Wis.) (1979)
https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/06/h_bomb_secret_0.gif
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_heavy_water_sabotage
One of the biggest advantages the US had in WWII was the ability to do all of its work (research, manufacturing, etc.) with relative immunity from interference. Of course that also came with the need to transport people and materials long distances to the war fronts.
Going beyond that, it seems highly unlikely Germany would have been able to devote the resources required by the Manhattan Project.Replies: @Jack D
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Bernhard
Putting captive scientists to work on the atom bomb should have been possible.
Dude, stick to science. You don't sound like a ninny when you talk about science.Replies: @PhysicistDave
The Germ Theory of Disease wrote to me:
I am talking about science.
The point is that there is no biological, scientific sense of “Europeans.” It is a geographical term, and the Sámi people and the Turks who live in Istanbul are indeed, geographically, European.
It is reasonable to interpret the term “European” in a non-geographic sense to mean people whose language, culture, etc. are related to other Europeans. And then the Ashkenazi are indeed Europeans.
What I am objecting to is the pseudo-science peddled by JIE that, in some biological sense, the Ashkenazim are not Europeans but certain privileged groups JIE likes (not, I imagine, the Sámi people and the Turks who live in Istanbul!) are biological Europeans.
That is pseudo-scientific nonsense, and, speaking as a scientist, I have standing to point that out.
I take it that you too embrace that pseudo-scientific nonsense?
If so, give it up — it’s embarrassing.
I would just generalize: race is a relatively novel concept. Putting aside leftist blather, it is true that it came into being through more frequent contacts with other human collectives who look significantly different & who are alien in their beliefs and customs.
Herodotus describes Hellenes as a group defined by their ancestry, language, way of life, religion and customs. I would say that for traditional peoples those two signifiers were central- ancestry & beliefs/way of life/religion. That's why some old Hebrews' religious chiefs, Hellenized, were negotiating with rulers of the post-Alexander Hellenic empire about local privileges, invoking (mythic) common ancestry with Spartans. This was not just a trick- they truly believed in this imaginary common bond with Spartans' ancestors.
Also, the Bible frequently talks about genealogy. Is this a proto-racial thing, then? When Ezra came from the Babylonian captivity, he urged local Jews to get rid of their non-Jewish wives. Was it a "racial" thing? I wouldn't say so. It was very likely a period of national crystallization through matrilineal descent, so it was nothing particularly racial, but essentially a form of religious nationalism in statu nascendi.
We can see this now in the stubbornness of many Jews in their refusal to acknowledge Jewish identity to individuals who have Jewish father & not Jewish mother. So, if a man has a Jewish mother & doesn't give a hoot about Judaism, he is, in their eyes, a Jew; on the other hand, a person with just a Jewish father who may be truly emotionally connected to Jewish identity is not considered to be a Jew, even if he goes through some non-Orthodox conversion practices. So, it is, fundamentally, about religious dogmas codified many centuries ago.
But- does it work?
I guess in theory yes, but in practice I think that even hard-core religionists can't seriously claim that someone born to Jewish mother, raised & living as a practicing Christian is a Jew. They do claim such things, but in reality it doesn't work. And such a person doesn't consider himself to be Jewish, except in some extraordinary, extremely marginal cases.
Hitler killed many people who he decreed to be Jewish, but, who actually were not.
In other cases, in the US, many, perhaps most Jewish communities accept those born to Jewish mothers, but with black fathers- and it is not some kind of liberal humanitarian magnanimity, but a diluted version of ancient religious practice.
To sum it- Jews are defined, even in secular societies, by religious prescripts which may be slightly modified, but their roots are safely anchored in that religious culture's history. That is why some white advocates like Jared Taylor are wrong when they accuse Jews like Yoram Hazony - I think I remember his name correctly- of hypocrisy of "betraying" their supposedly common principles- Jews view the social-cultural-national world differently & their position is not compatible with the dominant modern, post 18th C, European perspective. Simply, these are different world-views. There is a "naturally racialist" perspective even among non-extremist Europeans. Modern Europeans are truly secular & they don't view the world through Christian lens- unlike American Christian fundamentalists. For some of them- not all- Christianity comes first & they would put black Christians before white American atheists belonging to the Western civilization & American nation- which is, essentially, a throwback to the medieval mentality.
Other cultures & races have their own criteria, but they also evolved through history.
Chinese, aware of their huge numbers, swallowed Caucasians- mostly Iranians & Turks- who came with Mongols & stayed after the expulsion of Mongol ruling elites. They did it through intermarriage, so these Caucasians disappeared in the Chinese sea. Just, the Chinese are highly suspicious of intermarriage with whites- now, when their perception of the world is wider. Japanese are even more racially conscious. Generally, with very few exceptions, east Asians abhor the very idea of mixing with blacks. Their race consciousness is much higher than that of an average Klansman.
With Hindus, the primary collective identity is that of caste.
At the end, I would say that, for whites/Europeans, things differ by sex. A significant number of white women would be OK with their child belonging to a different race. With men-not so. Most white men, secular Europeans, if they somehow impregnated a woman of a different race, would accept a daughter visually belonging to another race. With sons- very rarely.
Men want their sons to be mirror images of themselves, at least when it comes to race. That is the reality. Replies: @Dmitry
While the different Greek tribes and cities were often in war against each other, their larger category would be Greek vs non-Greek. There were discussions about blood, this was viewed mainly as Greek vs barbarian. This is – civilization vs non-civilization.
Also the same person can be Jewish or not Jewish depending on different times or even the date of death. I wrote a comment about the cause célèbre in the Israeli media about this topic at the moment as one of the victims of October 7th was not allowed in the Jewish cemetery because of the date of death, but the moderator hasn’t approved it until now. Maybe it will be available soon.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/john-podhoretz-jews-are-not-white/#comment-6268024
So, to be Jewish or not, can also have the temporal component, which in this aspect is like gym membership, instead of fixed racial categorization (although there are examples like Michael Jackson).
It’s also because, if you refer to the religious Jews, they don’t have a materialist view. Their view is related to the supernatural concepts like the soul.
It’s probably functional as well, as they inherit a racially diversified community.
Even if you look at Orthodox Jews in the West Bank, it’s diverse ethnic origins there, with some people who could be related to 50 Cent, other maybe to Greta Thunberg.
Also for the ruling classes, caste has been the more important regulator or identity in parts of Europe.
For example, Queen Victoria could have a banquets each month with a royal family from Africa or Asia, invite them to the weddings. One of the favorite young people and god-daughter of Queen Victoria was an African princess.
But differences between Queen Victoria and a coal miner, would be too distant for Queen Victoria to invite coal miners to their banquets and weddings. So, barriers of caste would be more important than continents in those social circles.
https://time.com/6336614/tesla-and-x-face-advertiser-and-investor-fallout-over-elon-musks-controversial-post/
Steve, if you and other conservative social media stars don't support Elon Musk, then he is going to get cancelled and no one will dare to challenge Jewish power again. They will feel enboldened to end democracy through vote rigging. We must support Elon to save democracy in America.Replies: @Charles Erwin Wilson, @duncsbaby
As much as I admire our gracious host, I highly doubt that Sailer throwing his unbridled support behind Elon Musk will have any effect in Elon’s battle w/the Control-Left.
WTF?! Norman Jewison was not Jewish?! Oh boy, we actually had a goy heavy weight in Hollywood but everyone (including me) thought he was Jewish.
Pol Pot I don't know about, but Stalin and Hitler and Mao can all be seen to reflect cultural tendencies prevalent in the culture of their ancestors. Perhaps in unusually destructive ways, but...
For example, with Hitler, we get that typically Germanic absolute intellectual certainty and willingness to put a theoretical idea into practice without hesitation or qualification. In other contexts, that can be fine and noble; it didn't work out so well in 1933-45.
Perhaps Stalin wasn't such an oddity in Georgia; there's a positively evil Georgian Jewish politician in Israel who seems to share Stalin's belief that any problem can be solved with enough killing. Conversely, while Mao certainly managed to run up the body count, his style of leadership seems to have owed more to the East Asian tendency to govern through consensus and less to Stalin's brand of rule through sheer terror.
Most successful rulers seem to exemplify something in the national character. Has there ever been a more American president than Theodore Roosevelt? Kemal Ataturk strikes me as having been very, very Turkish. Wasn't Mussolini above all Italian?
...and when we contemplate Netanyahu's endless lying and clumsy attempts at manipulation, continuing without evidence of remorse or even greater refinement, what do we see?
Sure, one can cite exceptions, examples from other cultures: Not all mans be de same. I've had a Chinese lunatic pull a knife on me. Still, people do seem to conform to cultural, if not necessarily genetic, templates.
...and in regards to that last, I'll point you to Robert Plomin's Blueprint. Preferences in TV watching are genetically heritable.Replies: @Thea, @PhysicistDave
Colin Wright wrote to me:
Indeed, and we know there is such a thing as culture-genetic co-evolution: the classic example is lactose tolerance, and it is going to turn out that there are examples having to do with behavior and character. Pretty much a sure thing from basic principles of population genetics.
And, yet, contemporary Scandinavians really are descended from the Vikings. Everyone knows that variations in behavior and character within a single ethnic group are huge. This is even (partially) understood from an evolutionary and game-theoretic framework: e.g., “evolutionarily stable strategies” — “hawks and doves,” and all that.
So, trying to reduce dangerous or immoral behavior by some country or ethnic group to genetic factors is just a scientific error. Culture, tradition, and ideologies are almost always the basis for truly horrific crimes by large groups of people, even if those may be slightly modulated in some ways by biology.
Nah, the Germans would have developed the nuclear bomb first if the idiotic British and Americans hadn’t stupidly decided to wage war against them. The world would be a better place. You might still have a country, Steve.
Mankind would have come up with nuclear weapons eventually but in a war eventually is too late if by then you have already lost the war, as the Germans did.Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Twinkie
If I recall correctly, the Islamist terrorists also planned to blow up Gaudi’s amazing La Familia Sagrada cathedral in Barcelona, but didn’t get around to it.
I can recall Norman Jewison making clear in interviews over 50 years ago that, despite directing Fiddler on the Roof, he wasn’t Jewish. It’s like how a guy named “Tex” probably doesn’t live in Texas.
Quite so. Actually, Jews have run the slave trade in pretty much every time and place that slaves were ever traded, whenever/wherever they could get their claws into it. Including the Caribbean and North America. Jack D is pretty much the most hilarious liar on all Unz.
And then they sit down to their Seder supper, and sing funny songs celebrating the mass killing of African babies, and talk about the “bitterness” of slavery in Egypt, when they were only all too happy to start the practice themselves, fifteen minutes later. Jewish values, don’t ya know.
There are two moralities:
1. Slavery Is Categorically Bad, and
2. It Is Bad To Be A Slave, But If You’re Lucky Enough To Own Slaves, Then Cool.
ALL blacks and Jews subscribe to (2). Blacks whinge and whine about de turrrrble slabery, but if they had the opportunity to own Whites as slaves (and they have, and often), they’d all do it in a heartbeat. And not just for revenge, but for the sheer pleasure of it. As to Jews, the question is not even hypothetical: they own plenty of White slaves already, and have no intention of changing course.
Today on Unz, I learned that all slave traders were Jewish, all child molesting priests were Jewish, etc. The Men of Unz truly live in an alternate universe.Replies: @Curle, @res
It’s kinda funny that the Germans’ plan was to exterminate all the jews but for some reason let the smartest ones leave (and go on to work against them) instead of killing them.
The original Nazi plan before WWII was to press the Jews in German controlled territory to leave. As long as all the Jews were out of Germany, they were not Germany's problem. Before the war started, very few German Jews were murdered. Even the infamous Kristallnacht pogrom of November 1938 (initiated with the goal of convincing any German Jews who had not left yet to leave) only resulted in 91 Jewish deaths.
Einstein left Germany forever within months of Hitler ascending to power in 1933. On April 7, 1933, the German government passed the Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service, excluding Jews from all civil service positions, including those in public universities. Among those forced to flee Germany were fourteen Nobel laureates and twenty-six of the sixty professors of theoretical physics in the country.
Once the war began and Poland and later parts of the USSR were occupied, the Nazis realized that it was not going to be possible to exile the Jews so they decided to murder them all instead. At the Wannsee conference of January 1942, Nazi Party and German government officials gathered to coordinate implementation of the “Final Solution" (the extermination of the Jews of Europe). By that point, most of the German Jewish physicists had been gone for almost a decade.
This is all well known and documented history but I wouldn't expect an ignoramus like you to know this.Replies: @res
Poor Steve, he thinks he is talking to rational humans when in fact he is talking to crazy Nazis. You’ll never win an argument with someone who thinks that Hitler was right.
Mankind would have come up with nuclear weapons eventually but in a war eventually is too late if by then you have already lost the war, as the Germans did.
Etc.
You are just being silly.
Jews are not an ethnic group. They are a religious group.
Have you ever seen pictures of Ethiopian Jews?
They are not members of the same biological racial group as Ashkenazim.
Read Shlomo Sand's The Invention of the Jewish People: Jews no more exist as a biological unity than Sri Lankan Buddhists and Japanese Buddhists are part of the same biological race.
Yes, you can distinguish Ashkenazim Jews genetically from Estonians, just as you can distinguish Irishmen from Englishmen genetically or Germans from French.
And Germans and French are probably more closely related to each other than either are to Great Russians.
But you want a natural dividing line between Jews and Europeans... because you hate Jews.
And that dividing line simply does not exist.
Ashkenazim are, quite obviously, more closely related to Germans or Italians than any of those groups are to Ethiopian Jews.
In any case, why draw the dividing line between Ashkenazim and other Europeans as opposed to Northern vs. Southern Europeans or Slavs vs. Germanic groups?
Because you hate the Jews and want a dividing line between you and them.
And that is pseudo-science and is really stupid.
It also evades the fact that the annoying or despicable aspects of (some) Jews and some aspects of Jewish culture and religion are behavioral and cultural, not genetic.
Your pseudo-scientific nonsense impedes honest discussion of those very real issues.
Our racist nutjob also wrote to me:Nobody is "biologically European."
The Sámi people are Europeans. The Turks who live in Istanbul are Europeans.
I trust you will agree they are not part of the same biological group as French and Germans?
The racist nutjob also wrote:Oh, did Jack D concede all those debates? Or which outside debate judge adjudged you the winner?
Let me guess: the judge was... Jenner Ickham Errican!
Do you see why I am laughing at you?
You and Jack D are two sides of the same coin because you both insist on viewing Jews as some collective whole. I have never seen Jack criticize a single action by a Jew or a single aspect of Jewish culture or religion: for Jack, Jews are one unified ball of goodness.
You, too, want to lump all Jews together: hence, your insistence that Ashkenazi Jews are not Europeans, that, to use your words, "Either Jews physically exist, or not." Jews do physically exist, just as pigs, mushrooms, and stalactites all physically exist.
But Jews are not all part of one identifiable biological group. Ashkenazim, Mizrahim, and Ethiopian Jews differ more from each other than Ashkenazim do from many other Europeans.
Ashkenazim are most assuredly a European ethnic group, for the very simple reason that they lived for a very, very long time in the geographical area known as Europe, share substantial DNA with other Europeans, and had a language and a culture closely related to other Europeans.
Those are just facts, but you will not face those facts because you are one sick racist who hates the Jews as a collective.
Which really is pretty damn sick.Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @MEH 0910
Instead of your usual sputtering, maybe you can link to a debate I’ve lost? I’ve been in dozens and dozens, surely you can find at least one…
LOL! You contradict yourself by not accepting Skip Gates as a member of a (diaspora) “European ethnic group” (You call him “African-American” rather than European-American.) His biological and cultural heritage matches (or exceeds, culturally) the same qualifications you write above, in an American context. Yet you don’t accept him as European-American or White American. By analogy, you should. But you don’t. Weird.
Ah. You do agree that one can “distinguish Ashkenazi Jews genetically from Estonians”. Logically, then, one can also distinguish Ashkenazim genetically from all other European ethnicities.
Beyond that, is that Ashkenazi genetic difference due in part to their substantial Levantine/Semitic (i.e. non-European) biological inheritance? If so, they are, by definition, only part-European hybrids, genetically, like Skip Gates is a similar hybrid. Whom you don’t accept as European-American. You complain a lot about racism, but it seems you’re racist against mulattoes in America. What gives, prof?
They are not, simply based on the primitive practice of genital mutilation that they have carried with them throughout their history. No other European ethnicity practiced genital mutilation to the extent or for the same reasons as ethnic jews. No other European ethnicity fosters nearly as much intertwined sexual degeneracy with themselves or their children as jews.
The entirety of Europe for 1000 years and until very recently practiced some variation of Christianity, except for its jewish populations. Ethnicity is in part defined by a group's religious practices.
Yiddish is a language created as a specific effort to not assimilate to the local culture.
The Chinese have had a non assimilated community in San Fransisco (Chinatown) for 175 years. Are we to consider them "ethnically American?" No, while words on paper grant them citizenship, they have for the most part maintained a mostly unassimilated ethnic Chinese identity since their arrival in the 1850's.Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
Celler had so much money and influence that it only took him 40 years to get the law changed.
It took so long because America had more sense then and a population that was willing to take its own side in an argument and look out for its own interests.
First you argue that Cellar wasn't laboring for 40 years to change the law then you admit that he was.
Anything to win a case, eh counsellor?
More likely you and others are overestimating white American hatred for Jews and the alleged “exposure” to the public of their apparent machinations of globalism and race replacement.
Certainly Gen Z is appalled at Israel’s recent conduct in Gaza. Doesn’t make them based or anti Semitic.Replies: @Art Deco, @Wokechoke, @Rick P
It does make many of them anti-semitic. When you call for the annihilation of the state of Israel, I’d say that’s anti-semitic. Though many of the Gen Z protestors are more communist than anything else – going off the oppressed/oppressor matrix they’ve been taught.
Also remember, these young anti-Israel communists do not hate Israel because it’s pro-LGBT or whatever. They hate Israel because they are anti-white, and they consider Israel white.
What Gen Z folks made those statements? Specific citations would be helpful rather than empty rhetoric.
“Though many of the Gen Z protestors are more communist than anything else – going off the oppressed/oppressor matrix they’ve been taught.”
So we take it you’re Jewish. Nothing wrong with that, but your confirmation bias is clouding your judgement.Replies: @PhysicistDave
I was a philosemite when I was younger, largely because I bought into the media-constructed image of a persecuted, but plucky minority that made extraordinary accomplishments. But that image did not survive the repeated contacts with reality. Today, Jews are absolutely the most powerful, rich, and dominant minority in this country, but they still can't restrain themselves from elevating themselves as victims and libelously attacking the majority non-Jewish whites as oppressive racists all the while engaging in minoritarian tactics ("Let's go get the Christians, fellow non-Christian Hindus!").
As a recent example, I wrote of the following: https://www.unz.com/isteve/wapo-the-next-normal-states-will-recognize-multiparent-families/#comment-5150857And I am not the only ones to note this. I've discussed this change with my "normie" neighbors and friends, and, while they were not openly critical, they - almost to a person - rolled their eyes and evinced visible disapproval about what transpired.
I suspect there is a similar dynamic here to what's been happening with blacks. It's pretty obvious to many people that the black political salience is going to decline in the coming years as Hispanics and Asians have divergent and often opposing interests. So, I see the mass-hysteria about black "victimization" of late as a desperate attempt to codify black sacralization as much as possible while the political salience is still powerful. I suspect something similar is going on with the Jews. People are increasingly becoming aware of the confluence of negative elite dominance and Jewish preponderance in it, and Jews seems to be - hysterically - trying to whip up Jewish victimhood-elevation and sacralization while there is little coalesced opposition to them.Replies: @Rick P, @Corvinus
You’re upset because your kids got a couple of extra holidays? It’s not like they’re making them go to school on Christmas.
This isn't about my kids or my preferences. It's about a powerful minority group sacralizing itself as the "marginalized non-Christian community" and trying to disintegrate the core America. It's exactly what commenter AnotherDad correctly calls minoritarianism.
Do you see me agitating for a lunar new year holiday in America?
I've written on Unz in the past that, since the Jewish Emancipation (before which Jews contributed little to the European civilization), Jews have had both outsized social influence and scientific accomplishments, but that, on the whole, their political, economic, and cultural influence - dominance in the case of the U.S. in the recent decades - has been damaging and negative.
By the way, keep using "antisemite" repeatedly. A word so wantonly and cheaply used is going to run out of its meaning and power rather quickly.Replies: @Jack D
Taking into account both Koreas, the Kim family, the 36,000 American dead in the Korean War, the ongoing billions that we spend each year keeping 30,000 American troops there protecting the Koreans, and the threat that Korea will someday lob a nuclear missile at us, would you say that, on the whole, the contribution of the Korean people has been damaging and negative?
People here love to kvetch about the relatively modest aid that the US provides to Israel, but I don’t think I’ve ever heard a word of complaint about our massive troop presence in Korea or the tens of thousands of American boys that died there. Why does Israel get all the attention?
But I don't recall a powerful Korean minority in America agitating for this side or the other in 1950 or did I not read enough American history? I have this crazy notion that America went to war in Korea in 1950 for its own strategic, anti-communist reasons, not because of a strong pressure from the pro-South Korea lobby (like AIPAC) in the U.S.South Koreans are, by and large, quite grateful for that. Indeed, something like 400,000 South Korean soldiers died fighting alongside those American troops. As hundreds of thousands more South Korean soldiers and marines later fought in Vietnam. There is a history of alliance and shedding blood together between the two countries.I think we should withdraw our troops from South Korea, for sure. I'm on record as stating that we should withdraw all our troops abroad, except perhaps the U.K. and Japan (as insurance against future global conflicts).Well, I assume this is meant to be a comparison to Jewish-Americans, not Israelis since we are talking about meriting a place as a fellow American in America... in which case it's hard to assess the net contribution of Korean-Americans since their size and influence have been small at best and, crucially, they evince a high degree of assimilation. Koreans in America, like the Japanese before them, just melt into the majority population. But whatever the merits of their case, I certainly would argue that America needs no more immigrants from South Korea (which, also like Japan, obligingly is sending an ever-declining number of them each year in any case).When was the last time you saw South Korea use American billions in aid and free weaponry to bomb and kill neighboring civilians by the thousands?
When was the last time a rabidly partisan South Korean diaspora in America agitated for American support for South Korean military action beyond its borders?
When was the last time powerful Korean oligarchs and elites in America threatened the job prospects of young and idiotic anti-South Korea college protesters and otherwise engaged in attempts to silence their critics and curtail the freedom of speech?
Do you want me to keep going?
Now you answer my question: why is it wherever Jews go, they are mysteriously afflicted by "anti-Semitism" while, wherever Koreans go, there seems to be, equally mysteriously, no "anti-Koreanism" (excepting, of course, black ghettoes c. 1992) and, if anything, there are frequent appraisals as patriotic, model-minorities?
Do you really want a vote and find out?Replies: @Corvinus
Mankind would have come up with nuclear weapons eventually but in a war eventually is too late if by then you have already lost the war, as the Germans did.Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Twinkie
Or straight.
It is noteworthy that, until gigantic (and apparently equally intelligent) China in the mid-1960s, every nation that developed nuclear weaponry had an established Jewish minority. Even South Africa, who had help from Israel. (Okay, not a minority in that case.)
After some trolls in Madison (where else?) published the recipe, anyone could do it, provided his grocer had all the right ingredients.
United States v. Progressive Inc. (W.D. Wis.) (1979)
Beyond that, is that Ashkenazi genetic difference due in part to their substantial Levantine/Semitic (i.e. non-European) biological inheritance? If so, they are, by definition, only part-European hybrids, genetically, like Skip Gates is a similar hybrid. Whom you don't accept as European-American. You complain a lot about racism, but it seems you're racist against mulattoes in America. What gives, prof?Replies: @Mike Tre
“Ashkenazim are most assuredly a European ethnic group, ”
They are not, simply based on the primitive practice of genital mutilation that they have carried with them throughout their history. No other European ethnicity practiced genital mutilation to the extent or for the same reasons as ethnic jews. No other European ethnicity fosters nearly as much intertwined sexual degeneracy with themselves or their children as jews.
The entirety of Europe for 1000 years and until very recently practiced some variation of Christianity, except for its jewish populations. Ethnicity is in part defined by a group’s religious practices.
Yiddish is a language created as a specific effort to not assimilate to the local culture.
The Chinese have had a non assimilated community in San Fransisco (Chinatown) for 175 years. Are we to consider them “ethnically American?” No, while words on paper grant them citizenship, they have for the most part maintained a mostly unassimilated ethnic Chinese identity since their arrival in the 1850’s.
I think you underestimate what allied bombing raids (etc.) would have done to those efforts if known. Consider
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_heavy_water_sabotage
One of the biggest advantages the US had in WWII was the ability to do all of its work (research, manufacturing, etc.) with relative immunity from interference. Of course that also came with the need to transport people and materials long distances to the war fronts.
Going beyond that, it seems highly unlikely Germany would have been able to devote the resources required by the Manhattan Project.
Nope. Jewison is some sort of Anglo-Norman name – son of Jouet , pronounced “Jew way”. Jew way son. Back in the day the English were not shy about Anglicizing French spellings and making them more phonetic.
So (possibly) the Italian “giupesce” became the jewfish, etc. Often later on there were folk etymologies attached where some connection was made between Jews and the jewfish even though the origin was purely phonetic.
As has been noted, Anglo-Norman names are a good proxy for the richer, smarter, upper class sort of Englishmen. Anglo-Normans play in the same league as Jews when it comes to smarts and wealth but they get lumped in with the British in general so they are not as easily recognized as a separate highly accomplished group.
You see, traditional elites might lord over their social inferiors, but when their country is attacked, they stand in front of the bullets first as leaders. It's the price for lording over.
Do Jewish elites do that (excepting in Israel)? Or the fact that they live "convenient lives" (benefitting as coddled and sacralized elites, but avoiding leadership in the face of danger for their country) just a dastardly anti-Semitic blood libel?
https://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/WATCH-Deputy-Foreign-Minister-US-Jews-lead-convenient-lives-dont-serve-in-military-515028
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Martians_(scientists)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_heavy_water_sabotage
One of the biggest advantages the US had in WWII was the ability to do all of its work (research, manufacturing, etc.) with relative immunity from interference. Of course that also came with the need to transport people and materials long distances to the war fronts.
Going beyond that, it seems highly unlikely Germany would have been able to devote the resources required by the Manhattan Project.Replies: @Jack D
The work could have been done underground as was done by them for the construction of Messerschmitt Me-262 plane and as Iran is doing now. Of course this would require more effort, but luckily the Germans had lots of slave labor:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaihingen_an_der_Enz_concentration_camp
In fact, Heisenberg himself worked in a cave laboratory under a castle.
The German scientists informed the Nazis that it would take them at least 5 years (and maybe up to 20) to isolate enough isotopes to make a bomb and the Nazis understood that this would be too late to help in the war and they gave the project low priority. (This number doesn’t sound crazy given how long the Iranians have been working on their bomb). Heisenberg was incredulous when he found out that the Americans had done it in 3 years.
https://www.dw.com/en/why-didnt-the-nazis-beat-oppenheimer-to-the-nuclear-bomb/a-66540463
Just as much as the Jewish nuclear scientists, America’s industrial power helped make the bomb possible. The facilities at Oak Ridge and Hanford were on a massive (and costly) scale and would have been difficult for the Germans to duplicate, with or without Allied bombing. However, the Germans (perhaps for want of the necessary brain power) were unable to get even one reactor to achieve criticality. Apparently they had done their math wrong and their experimental reactor contained 50% less uranium than was necessary to achieve a chain reaction.
https://pubs.aip.org/physicstoday/article/72/5/36/926174/Tracking-the-journey-of-a-uranium-cubeA-mysterious
Nor was this for lack of materials – the Germans ran two reactor experiments and had the stock of uranium been combined into one they would have had enough. Note that this was just for a reactor, not for a bomb.
Etc.
You are just being silly.
Jews are not an ethnic group. They are a religious group.
Have you ever seen pictures of Ethiopian Jews?
They are not members of the same biological racial group as Ashkenazim.
Read Shlomo Sand's The Invention of the Jewish People: Jews no more exist as a biological unity than Sri Lankan Buddhists and Japanese Buddhists are part of the same biological race.
Yes, you can distinguish Ashkenazim Jews genetically from Estonians, just as you can distinguish Irishmen from Englishmen genetically or Germans from French.
And Germans and French are probably more closely related to each other than either are to Great Russians.
But you want a natural dividing line between Jews and Europeans... because you hate Jews.
And that dividing line simply does not exist.
Ashkenazim are, quite obviously, more closely related to Germans or Italians than any of those groups are to Ethiopian Jews.
In any case, why draw the dividing line between Ashkenazim and other Europeans as opposed to Northern vs. Southern Europeans or Slavs vs. Germanic groups?
Because you hate the Jews and want a dividing line between you and them.
And that is pseudo-science and is really stupid.
It also evades the fact that the annoying or despicable aspects of (some) Jews and some aspects of Jewish culture and religion are behavioral and cultural, not genetic.
Your pseudo-scientific nonsense impedes honest discussion of those very real issues.
Our racist nutjob also wrote to me:Nobody is "biologically European."
The Sámi people are Europeans. The Turks who live in Istanbul are Europeans.
I trust you will agree they are not part of the same biological group as French and Germans?
The racist nutjob also wrote:Oh, did Jack D concede all those debates? Or which outside debate judge adjudged you the winner?
Let me guess: the judge was... Jenner Ickham Errican!
Do you see why I am laughing at you?
You and Jack D are two sides of the same coin because you both insist on viewing Jews as some collective whole. I have never seen Jack criticize a single action by a Jew or a single aspect of Jewish culture or religion: for Jack, Jews are one unified ball of goodness.
You, too, want to lump all Jews together: hence, your insistence that Ashkenazi Jews are not Europeans, that, to use your words, "Either Jews physically exist, or not." Jews do physically exist, just as pigs, mushrooms, and stalactites all physically exist.
But Jews are not all part of one identifiable biological group. Ashkenazim, Mizrahim, and Ethiopian Jews differ more from each other than Ashkenazim do from many other Europeans.
Ashkenazim are most assuredly a European ethnic group, for the very simple reason that they lived for a very, very long time in the geographical area known as Europe, share substantial DNA with other Europeans, and had a language and a culture closely related to other Europeans.
Those are just facts, but you will not face those facts because you are one sick racist who hates the Jews as a collective.
Which really is pretty damn sick.Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @MEH 0910
https://www.unz.com/jman/the-behavioral-genetics-page/
But we are talking here about inherited traits across a whole ethnic group. And there ae two basic facts here:
A) There is a huge range of variation in character traits within any particular ethnic group.
Have I known any Jewish guys who were obnoxiously loud and aggressive? Sure, but I also had a Jewish-American friend who was very smart but also reserved and self-deprecating. And my Israeli friend from grad school was around the American median in terms of most of his behavioral traits (though much smarter than most people in any ethnic group).
And we know why this is: google "evolutionarily stable strategy." Any large human population tends to have some bullies and some wimps, some extroverts and some introverts, and so on.
B) And history and culture tend to trump genetics for the large-scale behavioral and character traits within large groups.
How do I know this?
Look at the historical record: German behavior in the early 1940s was radically different from German behavior in the 1960s. Why? Because defeat in WW II and the Occupation significantly changed German culture over a very short time period, even though the gene pool was not significantly different.
There are countless other examples of this sort: history and culture can change very, very fast, in less than a decade. The gene pool can change, but much more slowly.
Point 3 that you quoted is relevant here:Yes.
Many of the comments here, as is of course typical of the Web, come from people who have acquired a small amount of knowledge of some subject and, based on that very limited knowledge, form a completely new, and quite unfounded world-view.
As I said above, sure, everyone has always known that some behavioral tendencies are (partially) heritable. Behavioral genetics is filling in details on that very basic, age-old "folk knowledge."
But behavioral genetics does not, cannot, and never will refute what we all also know: there is dramatic variation within any ethnic group, and average behavior within any ethnic group is seriously malleable by culture and history.
Again, some people who have learned a small amount of science let their simple-minded understanding distort and blow away what is clearly true and what they themselves know, if only they think about it.
Which is not wise.
A bit like the poor fools who claim that Einstein proved that "everything is relative." Which of course he did not (and he never claimed to).Replies: @deep anonymous
What are you talking about? The U.S. destroyed Iraq, and the Project for a New American Century (Jewish neocon personified) demanded that it be done a few years in advance of when it was perpetrated. IIRC they predicted that the Iraqi people would welcome the Americans as liberators. Didn't work out that way, did it?Replies: @Art Deco
What are you talking about? The U.S. destroyed Iraq
==
It did not. Iraq has been in parlous condition since 1958, with a short sane interval in 1964-68. If you fancy Iraq was in handsome condition in 2003, you know nothing. As for the death toll since then, if I’m not mistaken, the Iraq Body Count has estimated that about 15% is attributable to coalition forces and Iraqi state forces. There have been people working at making a wreck of Iraq, but it isn’t us. The violence in Iraq has declined to a small fraction of what it was in 2017, so the place is now suffering security problems on the order of Ulster, ca. 1988, not an insurgency.
It’s very strange that a stray remark by an opinion journalist has provoked nearly 500 comments, many of them weirdly vitriolic.
They are not, simply based on the primitive practice of genital mutilation that they have carried with them throughout their history. No other European ethnicity practiced genital mutilation to the extent or for the same reasons as ethnic jews. No other European ethnicity fosters nearly as much intertwined sexual degeneracy with themselves or their children as jews.
The entirety of Europe for 1000 years and until very recently practiced some variation of Christianity, except for its jewish populations. Ethnicity is in part defined by a group's religious practices.
Yiddish is a language created as a specific effort to not assimilate to the local culture.
The Chinese have had a non assimilated community in San Fransisco (Chinatown) for 175 years. Are we to consider them "ethnically American?" No, while words on paper grant them citizenship, they have for the most part maintained a mostly unassimilated ethnic Chinese identity since their arrival in the 1850's.Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
Thanks Mike, but you might want to repost your comment in reply to PhysicistDave, whose quote you are responding to. Caveat: You have some okay points, but I can see him or others possibly taking them apart with counter-examples.
The easily proven thing Dave (and others here) are wrong on (likely willfully) regarding the Ashkenazim is genetics. He has taken the ridiculous position that Ashkenazim are of 100% European biological origin and not Levantine/Semitic mixed with European (i.e. hybrids, i.e., not European). Skip Gates, whom he doesn’t accept as racially/ethnically European-American, has the same amount of European blood as an Ashkenazim. Dave has yet to explain his double standard.
Sailer satirically wrote this recent headline:
It seems more than a few here (not you, of course) unironically agree with Steve’s mocking headline. On an HBD blog, that’s gonna be a tough row to hoe.
Not so much strange as a matter of that stray remark highlighting a common (and I would argue important) phenomenon in the Current Year.
If you mean this stray remark:
Then you shouldn’t be baffled. iSteve is known as an HBD blog, is it not? Either JPod is correct or not. Whether Jews are White or not, and whether that matters, is of great ongoing historical consequence, apparently.
Don’t be an idiot. The clever Hungarians weren’t ethnic Hungarians. They were almost all Jewish. This is like saying that American blacks are the the cleverest of all clever people based on all the Nobel prizes that white Americans have won.
Exactly. This is why there are many famous black physicists, Australian aborigine physicists, Palestinian physicists, etc.
Even goyische Hungarians have a reputation for cleverness.
And I was speaking of European ethnicities (including Ashkenazi).
We know you are a Jewish supremecist, Jack, who believes that your tribe is some kind of master race (despite the fact that it largely just turns out lawyers like you). I guess you were taught that while still in the cradle. But the rest of us aren't required to believe it.
My dad was intelligent but not intelligent enough to know what the inner city black students knew, that most of them would not be able get through physics. In that particular area, they were smarter than he was.
Is Greta Thunberg white? Hell no! She is an albinos autistic girl. Anyway The Swedish palefaces have contributed (though benefitted more than all others bar Israel) for so little of the artistic, scientific and political benefits that characterize the White world, except for the mysterious methods of evaluating the sizes of Nobel Prizes and measuring carbon footprints (Svante Arrhenius), that we should no longer consider them as Whites but as more akin to Lapps and other polar bears. The Vikings used to be Whites but the modern Swedes are not their descendants but their thralls’.
What? You've never heard of Włochy?
https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/A1MUOpvLLjL._AC_UF1000,1000_QL80_.jpg
https://api.culture.pl/sites/default/files/styles/1920_auto/public/images/imported/_a%20culture%20english/language/Name_of_your_country/20170126-italy_in_european_languages770.jpg?itok=fJcLNttxReplies: @Nachum
Ha!
Also walnuts.
There’s even a medieval gothic-type Hebrew font called “Vellish.”
And then they sit down to their Seder supper, and sing funny songs celebrating the mass killing of African babies, and talk about the "bitterness" of slavery in Egypt, when they were only all too happy to start the practice themselves, fifteen minutes later. Jewish values, don't ya know.
There are two moralities:
1. Slavery Is Categorically Bad, and
2. It Is Bad To Be A Slave, But If You're Lucky Enough To Own Slaves, Then Cool.
ALL blacks and Jews subscribe to (2). Blacks whinge and whine about de turrrrble slabery, but if they had the opportunity to own Whites as slaves (and they have, and often), they'd all do it in a heartbeat. And not just for revenge, but for the sheer pleasure of it. As to Jews, the question is not even hypothetical: they own plenty of White slaves already, and have no intention of changing course.Replies: @Jack D
In 1800, which was the last decade of slave importation, the US Jewish population was around 2,500 (0.04% of the population) so maybe 800 were working age Jewish men. Even if every last one of them was a slave trader then there wouldn’t have been enough Jews in America to run the slave trade.
Today on Unz, I learned that all slave traders were Jewish, all child molesting priests were Jewish, etc. The Men of Unz truly live in an alternate universe.
https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/jews-and-the-african-slave-trade/Here is a description of the scope of Aaron Lopez's operation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Lopez#Merchant_and_slave_traderSo not all, but definitely punching above that 0.04% population weight.
P.S. This page has a partial list of slave ships owned by Jews and additional references.
https://cdn.preterhuman.net/texts/unsorted/Who%20Brought%20the%20Slaves%20to%20America%20--%20part%20II%20of%20II.htm
Part 1 here.
https://cdn.preterhuman.net/texts/unsorted/Who%20Brought%20the%20Slaves%20to%20America%20--%20part%20I%20of%20II.htmReplies: @Jack D, @Corvinus
Today on Unz, I learned that all slave traders were Jewish, all child molesting priests were Jewish, etc. The Men of Unz truly live in an alternate universe.Replies: @Curle, @res
Because most sea trading of the era was between domestic sellers and buyers, right? Take the totality of the main slave trade era (for US colonies) 1713 – pick your date. Jews were part of the mix, as were Yankees.
He is clearly attempting to absolve Christians - if Jews ran the slave trade, then Christians bear no guilt, just as Christians bear no guilt for child molester priests because it turns out that all the child molester priests are actually Jewish too. Can't you see that this is just a mentally deranged form of denial?
What does "part of the mix" mean? If there was one Jewish slave trader, does that mean that Jews were "part of the mix"? Can you tell us exactly what % of the slave trade was conducted by Jews and provide a source. Weren't the Portuguese the big players in Africa and hadn't they expelled all their Jews in 1496?Replies: @Curle
It’s not the least bit funny. There’s nothing funny about genocide.
The original Nazi plan before WWII was to press the Jews in German controlled territory to leave. As long as all the Jews were out of Germany, they were not Germany’s problem. Before the war started, very few German Jews were murdered. Even the infamous Kristallnacht pogrom of November 1938 (initiated with the goal of convincing any German Jews who had not left yet to leave) only resulted in 91 Jewish deaths.
Einstein left Germany forever within months of Hitler ascending to power in 1933. On April 7, 1933, the German government passed the Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service, excluding Jews from all civil service positions, including those in public universities. Among those forced to flee Germany were fourteen Nobel laureates and twenty-six of the sixty professors of theoretical physics in the country.
Once the war began and Poland and later parts of the USSR were occupied, the Nazis realized that it was not going to be possible to exile the Jews so they decided to murder them all instead. At the Wannsee conference of January 1942, Nazi Party and German government officials gathered to coordinate implementation of the “Final Solution” (the extermination of the Jews of Europe). By that point, most of the German Jewish physicists had been gone for almost a decade.
This is all well known and documented history but I wouldn’t expect an ignoramus like you to know this.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/race-does-not-exist/#comment-6271698Replies: @Mike Tre, @Twinkie
You’re moving goal posts. He didn’t say that Jews were “part of the mix”. He said that Jews RAN the slave trade. That’s a totally different thing.
He is clearly attempting to absolve Christians – if Jews ran the slave trade, then Christians bear no guilt, just as Christians bear no guilt for child molester priests because it turns out that all the child molester priests are actually Jewish too. Can’t you see that this is just a mentally deranged form of denial?
What does “part of the mix” mean? If there was one Jewish slave trader, does that mean that Jews were “part of the mix”? Can you tell us exactly what % of the slave trade was conducted by Jews and provide a source. Weren’t the Portuguese the big players in Africa and hadn’t they expelled all their Jews in 1496?
You are overthinking it.
He is clearly attempting to absolve Christians - if Jews ran the slave trade, then Christians bear no guilt, just as Christians bear no guilt for child molester priests because it turns out that all the child molester priests are actually Jewish too. Can't you see that this is just a mentally deranged form of denial?
What does "part of the mix" mean? If there was one Jewish slave trader, does that mean that Jews were "part of the mix"? Can you tell us exactly what % of the slave trade was conducted by Jews and provide a source. Weren't the Portuguese the big players in Africa and hadn't they expelled all their Jews in 1496?Replies: @Curle
Read that Nation of Islam book. They lifted it from Jewish authors after all, or so they say. Whatever they lifted caused quite a ruckus back in the day. Or maybe the old Atlantic (?) magazine piece describing the ruckus and the book can still be located. I recall the piece was not a full throated support or condemnation of the NOI claims. If memory serves the claim is Jews were very involved for awhile then less so. At some point the Yankees became very involved. I don’t recall the distinction made between Jewish financiers and Portuguese or Spanish sailers/ships if any.
The economics of Slavery mean that you will get a few money lenders at the top of the heap. Insurers, bankrolls for entrepreneurs, silent investors all that good stuff. If that quantity of easy legally made money off the back, providing cheap labor did not attract Jews throughout history I’d be amazed. Slavery was a perfectly respectable way to make fortunes.
The Jewish sponsorship of contemporary mass migration is fundamentally no different from the administration of slave trading in several respects. Cheap labor and high rents come with the practice. Nevertheless, with various lawyers and administrators managing the lucre, the Middle Eastern Slave Trade, and the ugly enslavement of White Christians by Brown Jews & Muslims found in Spain before 1492 was very real and very big. The story is well catalogued.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_the_Ottoman_Empire
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gracia_Mendes_Nasi
In 1558, Doña Gracia was granted a long-term lease on the Tiberias region in Galilee (part of Ottoman Syria at the time), from Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent, in exchange for guaranteeing a substantial increase in the yearly tax revenues. The Ottoman Empire, under the Sultan, had conquered that part of the Holy Land some years earlier, but it was largely a desolate place. As a result, she obtained ruling authority over the Tiberias area. With the help of the Sultan, she then began to rebuild the area’s abandoned towns to make them available to refugees so they could settle there if they wished. Her aim was to make Tiberias into a major new center of Jewish settlement, trade and learning. A Jewish traveler who visited Tiberias around this time mentions how she had lent support to the Jewish community there, and how after her death they were compelled to ask for Jewish donations elsewhere. This venture has often been called one of the earliest attempts at a modern Zionist movement. Doña Gracia (Mendes) Nasi died in Istanbul in early 1569
1 in 5 people in the Ottoman empire were slaves. Jews were never enslaved in the Ottoman system.
Here’s a primer on the tax collectors of the Ottoman empire. It’s very hard to separate out the Jewish tax collectors efficiency with the military expansion of the Ottomans from a warband to an Empire.
one note, Jewish women more or less ran the Imperial Harem.
The economics of Slavery mean that you will get a few money lenders at the top of the heap. Insurers, bankrolls for entrepreneurs, silent investors all that good stuff. If that quantity of easy legally made money off the back, providing cheap labor did not attract Jews throughout history I’d be amazed. Slavery was a perfectly respectable way to make fortunes.
The Jewish sponsorship of contemporary mass migration is fundamentally no different from the administration of slave trading in several respects. Cheap labor and high rents come with the practice. Nevertheless, with various lawyers and administrators managing the lucre, the Middle Eastern Slave Trade, and the ugly enslavement of White Christians by Brown Jews & Muslims found in Spain before 1492 was very real and very big. The story is well catalogued.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_the_Ottoman_Empire
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gracia_Mendes_Nasi
In 1558, Doña Gracia was granted a long-term lease on the Tiberias region in Galilee (part of Ottoman Syria at the time), from Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent, in exchange for guaranteeing a substantial increase in the yearly tax revenues. The Ottoman Empire, under the Sultan, had conquered that part of the Holy Land some years earlier, but it was largely a desolate place. As a result, she obtained ruling authority over the Tiberias area. With the help of the Sultan, she then began to rebuild the area’s abandoned towns to make them available to refugees so they could settle there if they wished. Her aim was to make Tiberias into a major new center of Jewish settlement, trade and learning. A Jewish traveler who visited Tiberias around this time mentions how she had lent support to the Jewish community there, and how after her death they were compelled to ask for Jewish donations elsewhere. This venture has often been called one of the earliest attempts at a modern Zionist movement. Doña Gracia (Mendes) Nasi died in Istanbul in early 1569
1 in 5 people in the Ottoman empire were slaves. Jews were never enslaved in the Ottoman system.
Here’s a primer on the tax collectors and military contractors of the Ottoman empire. It’s very hard to separate out the Jewish tax collectors efficiency with the military expansion of the Ottomans from mere warband to Empire.
one note, Jewish women more or less ran the Imperial Harem.
Well, they are a mix. No doubt of that. Any notion of exclusive “purity” is silly. But, I find it interesting that a significant chunk of them are genetically oldies:
https://www.science.org/content/article/greeks-really-do-have-near-mythical-origins-ancient-dna-reveals
The Greeks really do have near-mythical origins, ancient DNA reveals
Analysis connects Greeks to the famed Mycenaeans and Minoans
Just research the topic of Jews in the Ottoman Empire.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gracia_Mendes_Nasi
In 1558, Doña Gracia was granted a long-term lease on the Tiberias region in Galilee (part of Ottoman Syria at the time), from Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent, in exchange for guaranteeing a substantial increase in the yearly tax revenues. The Ottoman Empire, under the Sultan, had conquered that part of the Holy Land some years earlier, but it was largely a desolate place. As a result, she obtained ruling authority over the Tiberias area. With the help of the Sultan, she then began to rebuild the area’s abandoned towns to make them available to refugees so they could settle there if they wished. Her aim was to make Tiberias into a major new center of Jewish settlement, trade and learning. A Jewish traveler who visited Tiberias around this time mentions how she had lent support to the Jewish community there, and how after her death they were compelled to ask for Jewish donations elsewhere. This venture has often been called one of the earliest attempts at a modern Zionist movement. Doña Gracia (Mendes) Nasi died in Istanbul in early 1569…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raid_of_the_Balearic_islands_(1558)
Look what she funded.
On 9 July 1558, the Ottomans under Piyale Pasha and Turgut Reis put the town under siege for eight days, then entered and decimated the town. After the fall of the citadel, the city was ravaged and the population enslaved. All of Ciutadella’s 3,099 inhabitants who survived the siege were sold into slavery in the Ottoman Empire, along with people from surrounding villages. In total, 3,452 locals were sold at the slave markets of Constantinople. The Balearic islands were ravaged, and 4,000 people were taken as prisoners
==
The 'war crimes' do not exist outside your imagination.Replies: @lavoisier
This is quite dishonest. Bombing hospitals and refugee camps are horrific war crimes.
==
The appellation 'war crime' is one of convenience for those who have other motives. You're not fooling anyone.Replies: @res
Hitler was a chaotic individual. Indeed he was proud of this. This was his ‘artistic temperament’, which he contrasted favorably with the staid, predictable, rules-obeying character of his generals and other Germans. His unpredictability is what made him such a dangerous antagonist. (In this regard he was a very un-German German.)
These aren’t good qualities for a peacetime leader however, and it’s hard to see Germany remaining at peace for long with Hitler in charge.
OTOH, if we imagine that Hitler had died or retired after defeating France and making peace with Britain, then what?
There would probably still have been a German-Soviet war, but it would likely have been limited to border clashes. The all-or-nothing attempt to destroy Russia and reduce it to a German colony – this was Hitler’s project. With him gone, I don’t see Germany trying to do such a thing.
(No I don’t buy the idea that Stalin was about to attack Germany and that Barbarossa was a pre-emptive strike. If Stalin was going to do this he would have done it while the Germans were engaged in France. Attacking Germany after the defeat of France would be extremely reckless.)
They engage in military operations in densely settled urban areas. You don’t want that, don’t start a war and put your troops and equipment in densely settled urban areas.
==
The appellation ‘war crime’ is one of convenience for those who have other motives. You’re not fooling anyone.
Today on Unz, I learned that all slave traders were Jewish, all child molesting priests were Jewish, etc. The Men of Unz truly live in an alternate universe.Replies: @Curle, @res
Here is a Jewish article on the slave trade which notes the following.
https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/jews-and-the-african-slave-trade/
Here is a description of the scope of Aaron Lopez’s operation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Lopez#Merchant_and_slave_trader
So not all, but definitely punching above that 0.04% population weight.
P.S. This page has a partial list of slave ships owned by Jews and additional references.
https://cdn.preterhuman.net/texts/unsorted/Who%20Brought%20the%20Slaves%20to%20America%20--%20part%20II%20of%20II.htm
Part 1 here.
https://cdn.preterhuman.net/texts/unsorted/Who%20Brought%20the%20Slaves%20to%20America%20--%20part%20I%20of%20II.htm
From the same page:Do you agree with this statement from the same source?Replies: @lavoisier, @res
According to Bertram W. Korn’s research (Jews and Negro Slavery in the Old South, 1789-1865), census records and slave purchasing documents show that southern Jews “who owned slaves were concentrated in cities, not in the plantation districts containing ninety percent of the enslaved population. For example, there were only four Jews – less than one-tenth of one percent – among the 11,000 Southerners who in 1830 owned fifty or more slaves.”
According to David Brion Davis, Professor of History Emeritus at Yale University, he writes “To keep matters in perspective, we should note that in the American South, in 1830, there were only 120 Jews among the 45,000 slaveholders owning twenty or more slaves and only twenty Jews among the 12,000 slaveholders owning fifty or more slaves. Even if each member of this Jewish slaveholding elite had owned 714 slaves—a ridiculously high figure in the American South—the total number would only equal the 100,000 slaves owned by black and colored planters in St. Domingue in 1789, on the eve of the Haitian Revolution…Of course, some Jews were involved in the slave trade. Every European Western nation was. There were also some regions in which the slave trade was more accessible to Jews—Rhode Island, Newport, Holland, to name a few striking examples. The Dutch Jews weren’t persecuted, so there were quite a few who were involved.”
From 1709-1807, there are 934 recorded voyages in which Rhode Island merchants were responsible for procuring 106,000 slaves. Now, Jews arrived in Newport as early as 1658. On the eve of the Revolution, they were estimated to be around thirty families. According to historical records used (e.g. naval office shipping lists, censuses, tax records) that identified merchants and planters as Jewish, there were 347 slave ships sent to Africa by Rhode Island slave traders from 1761-1774, with 21 being funded by Aaron Lopez, a Portuguese Jew. That means 326 voyages were underwritten by non-Jews during this time frame.
Of course, Jews played a role in the peddling of human flesh. The extent would appear to pale in comparison to other European ethnic groups.Replies: @Curle, @Colin Wright
The original Nazi plan before WWII was to press the Jews in German controlled territory to leave. As long as all the Jews were out of Germany, they were not Germany's problem. Before the war started, very few German Jews were murdered. Even the infamous Kristallnacht pogrom of November 1938 (initiated with the goal of convincing any German Jews who had not left yet to leave) only resulted in 91 Jewish deaths.
Einstein left Germany forever within months of Hitler ascending to power in 1933. On April 7, 1933, the German government passed the Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service, excluding Jews from all civil service positions, including those in public universities. Among those forced to flee Germany were fourteen Nobel laureates and twenty-six of the sixty professors of theoretical physics in the country.
Once the war began and Poland and later parts of the USSR were occupied, the Nazis realized that it was not going to be possible to exile the Jews so they decided to murder them all instead. At the Wannsee conference of January 1942, Nazi Party and German government officials gathered to coordinate implementation of the “Final Solution" (the extermination of the Jews of Europe). By that point, most of the German Jewish physicists had been gone for almost a decade.
This is all well known and documented history but I wouldn't expect an ignoramus like you to know this.Replies: @res
Here is an example of what Jack considers a joke.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/race-does-not-exist/#comment-6271698
Steve Sailer is OK with jew Nicholas Stix (a stupid and childish alias) calling anyone here who doesn't worship jews a nazi.
But he deletes attempts to call them both out.
I used to think Sailer had integrity, but he does not.
That you don't find his "joke" about the goyish whites needing to be lorded over by Jewish elites, because they were eeeeeevil racist enslavers just proves the fact that you don't get jokes and therefore have an inferior sense of humor to Jews, including Jack D.
==
The appellation 'war crime' is one of convenience for those who have other motives. You're not fooling anyone.Replies: @res
Seems to me that was far more true in Ukraine than Gaza. Were you speaking up about it then?
==
Which 'then' and in what discussion?Replies: @res
To the Gadsden Flag
Of the Thirteen States of America.
And to the Confederation for which it stands:
One Anglo-American Nation,
Under God,
With Liberty and Justice for all.Replies: @Corvinus
Unless you are willing to die to protect blood and soil, your “anthem” rings hollow.
Also remember, these young anti-Israel communists do not hate Israel because it's pro-LGBT or whatever. They hate Israel because they are anti-white, and they consider Israel white.Replies: @Corvinus, @Colin Wright
“It does make many of them anti-semitic. When you call for the annihilation of the state of Israel, I’d say that’s anti-semitic.”
What Gen Z folks made those statements? Specific citations would be helpful rather than empty rhetoric.
“Though many of the Gen Z protestors are more communist than anything else – going off the oppressed/oppressor matrix they’ve been taught.”
So we take it you’re Jewish. Nothing wrong with that, but your confirmation bias is clouding your judgement.
I have endorsed the phrase in that sense myself: ideally, I think the Zionists should leave and just let the Palestinians have their country back.
Of course, I know this will not happen. The best that can be hoped for is a secular, democratic state that treats Jews and Arabs equally.
The confusion here is, I think, more subtle than you may realize. The "annihilation" of the state of Israel or "wiping Israel off the map" need not mean killing any Israeli Jews at all.
After all, Czechoslovakia was "wiped off the map" with no bloodshed at all that I recall.
And the Soviet state was indeed "annihilated" with minimal bloodshed.
Uncritical defenders of the actions of the government of Israel are acting as if those of us who criticize those actions want to kill all of the Israeli Jews.
But I, and many critics of Israel, including, I am sure, you, do not want to kill any Israeli Jews at all.
I want an end to the killing as soon as possible.
But I do think that a lasting peace will require serious changes in the governance structure in the Southern Levant. Yes, "from the river to the sea."
Do you notice, by the way, that you, Jack,D, and I are partially on the same side in the debate in this thread? Our Jew-hating friends are making such outrageous claims that they are bringing us all together, just because we are pointing out obvious facts.Replies: @Mr. Anon
I was a philosemite when I was younger, largely because I bought into the media-constructed image of a persecuted, but plucky minority that made extraordinary accomplishments. But that image did not survive the repeated contacts with reality. Today, Jews are absolutely the most powerful, rich, and dominant minority in this country, but they still can't restrain themselves from elevating themselves as victims and libelously attacking the majority non-Jewish whites as oppressive racists all the while engaging in minoritarian tactics ("Let's go get the Christians, fellow non-Christian Hindus!").
As a recent example, I wrote of the following: https://www.unz.com/isteve/wapo-the-next-normal-states-will-recognize-multiparent-families/#comment-5150857And I am not the only ones to note this. I've discussed this change with my "normie" neighbors and friends, and, while they were not openly critical, they - almost to a person - rolled their eyes and evinced visible disapproval about what transpired.
I suspect there is a similar dynamic here to what's been happening with blacks. It's pretty obvious to many people that the black political salience is going to decline in the coming years as Hispanics and Asians have divergent and often opposing interests. So, I see the mass-hysteria about black "victimization" of late as a desperate attempt to codify black sacralization as much as possible while the political salience is still powerful. I suspect something similar is going on with the Jews. People are increasingly becoming aware of the confluence of negative elite dominance and Jewish preponderance in it, and Jews seems to be - hysterically - trying to whip up Jewish victimhood-elevation and sacralization while there is little coalesced opposition to them.Replies: @Rick P, @Corvinus
“I was a philosemite when I was younger, largely because I bought into the media-constructed image of a persecuted, but plucky minority that made extraordinary accomplishments.”
So you buy into the media-constructed image of a devious group who by hook or by crook is fomenting anti-white hatred.
“Today, Jews are absolutely the most powerful, rich, and dominant minority in this country, but they still can’t restrain themselves from elevating themselves as victims and libelously attacking the majority non-Jewish whites as oppressive racists all the while engaging in minoritarian tactics”
The Alt Right can’t restrain itself from elevating itself as victims and libelously attacking whites who have allegedly been hoodwinked by Jews into supporting the destruction of their own kind. See how that works, Twinks?
“And I am not the only ones to note this. I’ve discussed this change with my “normie” neighbors and friends, and, while they were not openly critical, they – almost to a person – rolled their eyes and evinced visible disapproval about what transpired.”
Absolutely. Because you and they are of a similar mindset and experiences. It wasn’t necessarily an epiphany on their part, that they realized that Jews purposely underminded them with propaganda, it is more like their (and your) confirmation bias coming into the fold.
I see the mass-hysteria about white “victimization” of late as a desperate attempt to codify whiteness as the end all and be all. That is, if whites do NOT subscribe to being 100 percent “pro-white”, then they are deemed “enemies” and traitors by the Alt Right, who seem to be – hysterically – trying to whip up European victimhood-elevation and Anglo sacralization.
Yeah, if I want to learn about history, NOI is the first source I would turn to. Is the story about the Jewish slave traders in the same book as the story of Yaqub?
https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/jews-and-the-african-slave-trade/Here is a description of the scope of Aaron Lopez's operation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Lopez#Merchant_and_slave_traderSo not all, but definitely punching above that 0.04% population weight.
P.S. This page has a partial list of slave ships owned by Jews and additional references.
https://cdn.preterhuman.net/texts/unsorted/Who%20Brought%20the%20Slaves%20to%20America%20--%20part%20II%20of%20II.htm
Part 1 here.
https://cdn.preterhuman.net/texts/unsorted/Who%20Brought%20the%20Slaves%20to%20America%20--%20part%20I%20of%20II.htmReplies: @Jack D, @Corvinus
The ‘Who Brought the Slaves to America” text seem to come from some kind of far right -Holocaust denial site. It’s just a bunch of hate filled garbage maybe with a few actual facts mixed in by accident. Using this kind of crap as a source is self-refuting.
From the same page:
Do you agree with this statement from the same source?
So many lies have been told about the holocaust and so many laws have been constructed to force one to believe in one specific narrative that what one believes becomes irrelevant. In many jurisdictions in the so called freedom loving West doubting the holocaust narrative is a crime.
I remain agnostic on the matter as I have no way of determining what is true or false about the subject given the constraints that have been placed on all of us about this one historical event. If one cannot determine the truth or the falsity of a subject and explore it in all different aspects one is blind. I suspect that the few individuals who have gotten closest to the truth are the historians who have access to the historical records and have done their research and have been free to publish their findings. Does such a situation exist in the West today? To ask the question is to answer it.
What is impossible to deny is that man's inhumanity to his fellow man appears to have no boundaries-.Replies: @Steve Sailer
Using "that kind of crap" as a source of further references can be helpful. Especially since much of that information seems to be scrubbed from more reputable sources. But is there if one looks hard enough in older (e.g. contemporary/primary) references.Not sure. Much depends on how literally "6 million" is taken. But any critical discussion of that number seems to be forbidden so I guess the distinction does not matter to you.
Here is one take Ron Unz offered on that number.
https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/P.S. No response to the Aaron Lopez part of my comment?
https://www.unz.com/isteve/race-does-not-exist/#comment-6271698Replies: @Mike Tre, @Twinkie
Sailer flushed my reply to Jag D because Steve Sailer endorses the lies that Jag D pushes here on a daily basis.
Steve Sailer is OK with jew Nicholas Stix (a stupid and childish alias) calling anyone here who doesn’t worship jews a nazi.
But he deletes attempts to call them both out.
I used to think Sailer had integrity, but he does not.
That is a common misconception, but it is simply not true. The Germans weren’t even working on a nuclear weapon. They concluded early on that it would be a vast effort that they couldn’t pull off in wartime, assuming it could be done at all (which, nobody was sure of at the time). They were alreadly stretched thin just maintaining the war effort and their occupation of Europe.
I’m not being an idiot.
Even goyische Hungarians have a reputation for cleverness.
And I was speaking of European ethnicities (including Ashkenazi).
We know you are a Jewish supremecist, Jack, who believes that your tribe is some kind of master race (despite the fact that it largely just turns out lawyers like you). I guess you were taught that while still in the cradle. But the rest of us aren’t required to believe it.
You are being disingenuous. Of course Cellar didn’t need money himself. There were plenty of like minded organizations of his co-ethnics with deep pockets to prepare the way.
It took so long because America had more sense then and a population that was willing to take its own side in an argument and look out for its own interests.
First you argue that Cellar wasn’t laboring for 40 years to change the law then you admit that he was.
Anything to win a case, eh counsellor?
https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/jews-and-the-african-slave-trade/Here is a description of the scope of Aaron Lopez's operation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Lopez#Merchant_and_slave_traderSo not all, but definitely punching above that 0.04% population weight.
P.S. This page has a partial list of slave ships owned by Jews and additional references.
https://cdn.preterhuman.net/texts/unsorted/Who%20Brought%20the%20Slaves%20to%20America%20--%20part%20II%20of%20II.htm
Part 1 here.
https://cdn.preterhuman.net/texts/unsorted/Who%20Brought%20the%20Slaves%20to%20America%20--%20part%20I%20of%20II.htmReplies: @Jack D, @Corvinus
Slave ownership was much more common in southern urban areas than in the southern countryside. The relatively high proportion of Jewish slaveholding was a function of the concentration of Jews in cities and towns, not of their descent or religion. It is also the case that urban slaveholders of whatever background owned fewer slaves on average than rural slaveholders, including those on large plantations. Thus the proportion of slaveholders has never been an accurate measure of the social or economic importance of slaveholding, unless it is assessed on a broadly regional or state-by-state basis. In this instance, as in so many others, the statistical data do not stand up and cry out their own true significance.
According to Bertram W. Korn’s research (Jews and Negro Slavery in the Old South, 1789-1865), census records and slave purchasing documents show that southern Jews “who owned slaves were concentrated in cities, not in the plantation districts containing ninety percent of the enslaved population. For example, there were only four Jews – less than one-tenth of one percent – among the 11,000 Southerners who in 1830 owned fifty or more slaves.”
According to David Brion Davis, Professor of History Emeritus at Yale University, he writes “To keep matters in perspective, we should note that in the American South, in 1830, there were only 120 Jews among the 45,000 slaveholders owning twenty or more slaves and only twenty Jews among the 12,000 slaveholders owning fifty or more slaves. Even if each member of this Jewish slaveholding elite had owned 714 slaves—a ridiculously high figure in the American South—the total number would only equal the 100,000 slaves owned by black and colored planters in St. Domingue in 1789, on the eve of the Haitian Revolution…Of course, some Jews were involved in the slave trade. Every European Western nation was. There were also some regions in which the slave trade was more accessible to Jews—Rhode Island, Newport, Holland, to name a few striking examples. The Dutch Jews weren’t persecuted, so there were quite a few who were involved.”
From 1709-1807, there are 934 recorded voyages in which Rhode Island merchants were responsible for procuring 106,000 slaves. Now, Jews arrived in Newport as early as 1658. On the eve of the Revolution, they were estimated to be around thirty families. According to historical records used (e.g. naval office shipping lists, censuses, tax records) that identified merchants and planters as Jewish, there were 347 slave ships sent to Africa by Rhode Island slave traders from 1761-1774, with 21 being funded by Aaron Lopez, a Portuguese Jew. That means 326 voyages were underwritten by non-Jews during this time frame.
Of course, Jews played a role in the peddling of human flesh. The extent would appear to pale in comparison to other European ethnic groups.
Your factoid ignores the slave trade period from 1713 - 1761. Second, you name a single confidently identified Portuguese Jew. Have you ever tried to identify Iberian Jews by surname? I have, it’s tougher than for Northern European Jews, at least for me and Iberian Jews were thicker on the ground in North and South America in the early years than is commonly imagined. This occurred for several reasons, first and foremost the policies of the Spanish Crown incentivized it and second many converted to Christianity over time.
Jack’s snark aside, the NOI book from several years ago was given serious treatment by at least one influential publication because it relied on Jewish sources to get around the problem of identification by name. For whatever reason, Jews weren’t as circumspect about their role in the slave trade in the past nor did they inflate it. The summary of their involvement from these Jewish sources was very involved in initial years to less involved in later years, years that corresponded with a rise in Yankee traders. Also, bear in mind that domestic and Caribbean slave breeding was a going concern by the mid 18th century diverting much of the market in slaves away from continental trading.Replies: @res, @Corvinus
MEH wrote to me:
No one seriously doubts that some behavioral traits are heritable. Since time immemorial, people have been saying things like “She inherited her mother’s sweet disposition” or “He inherited his father’s tendency towards drunkenness.”
But we are talking here about inherited traits across a whole ethnic group. And there ae two basic facts here:
A) There is a huge range of variation in character traits within any particular ethnic group.
Have I known any Jewish guys who were obnoxiously loud and aggressive? Sure, but I also had a Jewish-American friend who was very smart but also reserved and self-deprecating. And my Israeli friend from grad school was around the American median in terms of most of his behavioral traits (though much smarter than most people in any ethnic group).
And we know why this is: google “evolutionarily stable strategy.” Any large human population tends to have some bullies and some wimps, some extroverts and some introverts, and so on.
B) And history and culture tend to trump genetics for the large-scale behavioral and character traits within large groups.
How do I know this?
Look at the historical record: German behavior in the early 1940s was radically different from German behavior in the 1960s. Why? Because defeat in WW II and the Occupation significantly changed German culture over a very short time period, even though the gene pool was not significantly different.
There are countless other examples of this sort: history and culture can change very, very fast, in less than a decade. The gene pool can change, but much more slowly.
Point 3 that you quoted is relevant here:
Yes.
Many of the comments here, as is of course typical of the Web, come from people who have acquired a small amount of knowledge of some subject and, based on that very limited knowledge, form a completely new, and quite unfounded world-view.
As I said above, sure, everyone has always known that some behavioral tendencies are (partially) heritable. Behavioral genetics is filling in details on that very basic, age-old “folk knowledge.”
But behavioral genetics does not, cannot, and never will refute what we all also know: there is dramatic variation within any ethnic group, and average behavior within any ethnic group is seriously malleable by culture and history.
Again, some people who have learned a small amount of science let their simple-minded understanding distort and blow away what is clearly true and what they themselves know, if only they think about it.
Which is not wise.
A bit like the poor fools who claim that Einstein proved that “everything is relative.” Which of course he did not (and he never claimed to).
The German gene pool was not significantly different after millions of their most capable young men were killed in the war and the aftermath? Count me skeptical.
On the other hand, I concur that psychological techniques/propaganda/brainwashing can sway large numbers of people within a relatively short time (that is, a few decades). Witness what has happened in U.S. schools and universities just within my lifetime. Or compare polling regarding "same-sex marriage" from, say, 1995 to today.Replies: @PhysicistDave
What Gen Z folks made those statements? Specific citations would be helpful rather than empty rhetoric.
“Though many of the Gen Z protestors are more communist than anything else – going off the oppressed/oppressor matrix they’ve been taught.”
So we take it you’re Jewish. Nothing wrong with that, but your confirmation bias is clouding your judgement.Replies: @PhysicistDave
Corvinus wrote to Rick P:
The slgoan “from the river to the sea” is generally taken to mean that all of historical Palestine will be a Palestinian state, and, hence, that there will no longer be a state of Israel.
I have endorsed the phrase in that sense myself: ideally, I think the Zionists should leave and just let the Palestinians have their country back.
Of course, I know this will not happen. The best that can be hoped for is a secular, democratic state that treats Jews and Arabs equally.
The confusion here is, I think, more subtle than you may realize. The “annihilation” of the state of Israel or “wiping Israel off the map” need not mean killing any Israeli Jews at all.
After all, Czechoslovakia was “wiped off the map” with no bloodshed at all that I recall.
And the Soviet state was indeed “annihilated” with minimal bloodshed.
Uncritical defenders of the actions of the government of Israel are acting as if those of us who criticize those actions want to kill all of the Israeli Jews.
But I, and many critics of Israel, including, I am sure, you, do not want to kill any Israeli Jews at all.
I want an end to the killing as soon as possible.
But I do think that a lasting peace will require serious changes in the governance structure in the Southern Levant. Yes, “from the river to the sea.”
Do you notice, by the way, that you, Jack,D, and I are partially on the same side in the debate in this thread? Our Jew-hating friends are making such outrageous claims that they are bringing us all together, just because we are pointing out obvious facts.
Why shouldn't Jews have their own state? And exclusive use of that state?
The best that could be hoped for is a nation state for each group, Jews and Arabs, where neither is under the control of the other. That's probably not going to happen either.
In any event, I don't see that any of it is my concern, and I don't see why the government of my country should make it my concern.Replies: @HammerJack, @PhysicistDave
The way you "talk" to Jack is different from whites. It's subtle, but it's there.
Jews' mind tricks fall on deaf ears when used against non-whites. There's an indifference with your comments to Jack that isn't there with whites.
It's fun to watch because Jack can't see it. Jews are a remarkably talented people, but self-awareness isn't exactly their strong suit.Replies: @Twinkie
Amazing! You can sniff out my Asianness (or non-whiteness) over the keyboard!
Aren’t you glad I am here? I am doing the anti-“Jew’s mind tricks” job that (goyish white) Americans won’t do! 😉
Mr. Anon wrote to Colin Wright:
As a physicist who actually knew some people who worked on the Manhattan Project, I want to note that Jack D is correct about the Hungarians: Wigner, Teller, Szilard, and Johnny von Neumann — the so-called “Martians” — were all of Jewish descent.
Reportedly, they all attended the same high school in Budapest.
So, figure out how to replicate that milieu and do you get a genius factory?
https://www.unz.com/isteve/race-does-not-exist/#comment-6271698Replies: @Mike Tre, @Twinkie
But, as Jack D assures us, Jews have a superior sense of humor!
That you don’t find his “joke” about the goyish whites needing to be lorded over by Jewish elites, because they were eeeeeevil racist enslavers just proves the fact that you don’t get jokes and therefore have an inferior sense of humor to Jews, including Jack D.
People here love to kvetch about the relatively modest aid that the US provides to Israel, but I don't think I've ever heard a word of complaint about our massive troop presence in Korea or the tens of thousands of American boys that died there. Why does Israel get all the attention?Replies: @Twinkie
Yes, that is very “funny.” Half of my mother’s family was murdered by North Korean communists led by Kim Il-Sung. If you (or Israel) wanna nuke those guys, go ahead. I won’t shed a tear.
But I don’t recall a powerful Korean minority in America agitating for this side or the other in 1950 or did I not read enough American history? I have this crazy notion that America went to war in Korea in 1950 for its own strategic, anti-communist reasons, not because of a strong pressure from the pro-South Korea lobby (like AIPAC) in the U.S.
South Koreans are, by and large, quite grateful for that. Indeed, something like 400,000 South Korean soldiers died fighting alongside those American troops. As hundreds of thousands more South Korean soldiers and marines later fought in Vietnam. There is a history of alliance and shedding blood together between the two countries.
I think we should withdraw our troops from South Korea, for sure. I’m on record as stating that we should withdraw all our troops abroad, except perhaps the U.K. and Japan (as insurance against future global conflicts).
Well, I assume this is meant to be a comparison to Jewish-Americans, not Israelis since we are talking about meriting a place as a fellow American in America… in which case it’s hard to assess the net contribution of Korean-Americans since their size and influence have been small at best and, crucially, they evince a high degree of assimilation. Koreans in America, like the Japanese before them, just melt into the majority population. But whatever the merits of their case, I certainly would argue that America needs no more immigrants from South Korea (which, also like Japan, obligingly is sending an ever-declining number of them each year in any case).
When was the last time you saw South Korea use American billions in aid and free weaponry to bomb and kill neighboring civilians by the thousands?
When was the last time a rabidly partisan South Korean diaspora in America agitated for American support for South Korean military action beyond its borders?
When was the last time powerful Korean oligarchs and elites in America threatened the job prospects of young and idiotic anti-South Korea college protesters and otherwise engaged in attempts to silence their critics and curtail the freedom of speech?
Do you want me to keep going?
Now you answer my question: why is it wherever Jews go, they are mysteriously afflicted by “anti-Semitism” while, wherever Koreans go, there seems to be, equally mysteriously, no “anti-Koreanism” (excepting, of course, black ghettoes c. 1992) and, if anything, there are frequent appraisals as patriotic, model-minorities?
Do you really want a vote and find out?
JFC, you are neck deep in false equivalence here.
“they evince a high degree of assimilation. Koreans in America, like the Japanese before them, just melt into the majority population.”
Not according to WASPs. Not according to “Heritage Americans”. Allegedly, right? A good deal of members from this group you desperately want to be included HATES you, especially since you race mixed. I thought race mixing is “anti-white”. I haven’t NOTICED if Mr. Sailer has come out and denounced mixed marriages and the during of offspring. Perhaps YOU can enlighten us regarding his position.
Remember, Asians who came to our great land were looked by these patriots as being unfit to be an American. Apparently, the Immigration Law of 1790 was designed only to entice white Europeans of good moral standing to emigrate. So, what changed, magic dirt?Replies: @HammerJack
My kids are homeschooled or attend parochial schools.
This isn’t about my kids or my preferences. It’s about a powerful minority group sacralizing itself as the “marginalized non-Christian community” and trying to disintegrate the core America. It’s exactly what commenter AnotherDad correctly calls minoritarianism.
Do you see me agitating for a lunar new year holiday in America?
So (possibly) the Italian "giupesce" became the jewfish, etc. Often later on there were folk etymologies attached where some connection was made between Jews and the jewfish even though the origin was purely phonetic.
As has been noted, Anglo-Norman names are a good proxy for the richer, smarter, upper class sort of Englishmen. Anglo-Normans play in the same league as Jews when it comes to smarts and wealth but they get lumped in with the British in general so they are not as easily recognized as a separate highly accomplished group.Replies: @Twinkie
There is another reason they blend. Those “Anglo-Normans” not only shared the same religion as their social inferiors, but also led the latter, with their Webley revolvers in hand (“Follow me, men!”), and went over the trenches first and were mowed down by enemy machine guns in disproportionately higher numbers than the ordinary Brits. It’s a part of their tradition – it’s called noblesse oblige. Even Prince Harry deployed to the combat zone.
You see, traditional elites might lord over their social inferiors, but when their country is attacked, they stand in front of the bullets first as leaders. It’s the price for lording over.
Do Jewish elites do that (excepting in Israel)? Or the fact that they live “convenient lives” (benefitting as coddled and sacralized elites, but avoiding leadership in the face of danger for their country) just a dastardly anti-Semitic blood libel?
https://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/WATCH-Deputy-Foreign-Minister-US-Jews-lead-convenient-lives-dont-serve-in-military-515028
Mankind would have come up with nuclear weapons eventually but in a war eventually is too late if by then you have already lost the war, as the Germans did.Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Twinkie
You are just like these “Nazis,” only your god is Likudnik Israel instead of Hitler. And in its service, you attack your supposed fellow citizens libelously, obfuscate, lie, etc.
My father taught high school physics in Indianapolis in the sixties. A surge in crime led to white flight and his school turning mostly black. He spent a lot of time and effort trying to talk the black kids into taking his physics course but failed and ended up moving out to a suburban school because there was no longer any demand for his course in his old high school.
My dad was intelligent but not intelligent enough to know what the inner city black students knew, that most of them would not be able get through physics. In that particular area, they were smarter than he was.
Like I said, NOI compiled previous work by Jewish authors.
According to Bertram W. Korn’s research (Jews and Negro Slavery in the Old South, 1789-1865), census records and slave purchasing documents show that southern Jews “who owned slaves were concentrated in cities, not in the plantation districts containing ninety percent of the enslaved population. For example, there were only four Jews – less than one-tenth of one percent – among the 11,000 Southerners who in 1830 owned fifty or more slaves.”
According to David Brion Davis, Professor of History Emeritus at Yale University, he writes “To keep matters in perspective, we should note that in the American South, in 1830, there were only 120 Jews among the 45,000 slaveholders owning twenty or more slaves and only twenty Jews among the 12,000 slaveholders owning fifty or more slaves. Even if each member of this Jewish slaveholding elite had owned 714 slaves—a ridiculously high figure in the American South—the total number would only equal the 100,000 slaves owned by black and colored planters in St. Domingue in 1789, on the eve of the Haitian Revolution…Of course, some Jews were involved in the slave trade. Every European Western nation was. There were also some regions in which the slave trade was more accessible to Jews—Rhode Island, Newport, Holland, to name a few striking examples. The Dutch Jews weren’t persecuted, so there were quite a few who were involved.”
From 1709-1807, there are 934 recorded voyages in which Rhode Island merchants were responsible for procuring 106,000 slaves. Now, Jews arrived in Newport as early as 1658. On the eve of the Revolution, they were estimated to be around thirty families. According to historical records used (e.g. naval office shipping lists, censuses, tax records) that identified merchants and planters as Jewish, there were 347 slave ships sent to Africa by Rhode Island slave traders from 1761-1774, with 21 being funded by Aaron Lopez, a Portuguese Jew. That means 326 voyages were underwritten by non-Jews during this time frame.
Of course, Jews played a role in the peddling of human flesh. The extent would appear to pale in comparison to other European ethnic groups.Replies: @Curle, @Colin Wright
“there were 347 slave ships sent to Africa by Rhode Island slave traders from 1761-1774, with 21 being funded by Aaron Lopez, a Portuguese Jew. That means 326 voyages were underwritten by non-Jews during this time frame.”
Your factoid ignores the slave trade period from 1713 – 1761. Second, you name a single confidently identified Portuguese Jew. Have you ever tried to identify Iberian Jews by surname? I have, it’s tougher than for Northern European Jews, at least for me and Iberian Jews were thicker on the ground in North and South America in the early years than is commonly imagined. This occurred for several reasons, first and foremost the policies of the Spanish Crown incentivized it and second many converted to Christianity over time.
Jack’s snark aside, the NOI book from several years ago was given serious treatment by at least one influential publication because it relied on Jewish sources to get around the problem of identification by name. For whatever reason, Jews weren’t as circumspect about their role in the slave trade in the past nor did they inflate it. The summary of their involvement from these Jewish sources was very involved in initial years to less involved in later years, years that corresponded with a rise in Yankee traders. Also, bear in mind that domestic and Caribbean slave breeding was a going concern by the mid 18th century diverting much of the market in slaves away from continental trading.
https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-oddities-of-the-jewish-religion/I thought Ron wrote more on this topic, but am not finding anything. Anyone have a link?
This recent NOI article on unz.com has more on the slave trade.
https://www.unz.com/article/jewish-scholarship-exterminated-by-new-anti-semitism-definition/
Here is a 2019 article from when Amazon banned The Secret Relationship series.
https://www.unz.com/article/amazon-bans-the-secret-relationship-between-blacks-jews/
That may be, but the fact remains that non-Jews figured much more prominently in the American slave trade than Jews. Perhaps YOU have a source for that time period to support YOUR contention that Jews were much more important?
"Have you ever tried to identify Iberian Jews by surname? I have, it’s tougher than for Northern European Jews, at least for me and Iberian Jews were thicker on the ground in North and South America in the early years than is commonly imagined."
I assume that you have sources showing that Iberian Jews played a vital role in the American slave trade? Seems to me you are diverting attention to the facts I offered.
"Jack’s snark aside, the NOI book from several years ago was given serious treatment by at least one influential publication because it relied on Jewish sources to get around the problem of identification by name."
Citations required on your part here to justify your contention.
"The summary of their involvement from these Jewish sources was very involved in initial years to less involved in later years, years that corresponded with a rise in Yankee traders."
Again, you are making a charge here. Support it with evidence.
From the same page:Do you agree with this statement from the same source?Replies: @lavoisier, @res
Belief in the holocaust has become an act of faith.
So many lies have been told about the holocaust and so many laws have been constructed to force one to believe in one specific narrative that what one believes becomes irrelevant. In many jurisdictions in the so called freedom loving West doubting the holocaust narrative is a crime.
I remain agnostic on the matter as I have no way of determining what is true or false about the subject given the constraints that have been placed on all of us about this one historical event. If one cannot determine the truth or the falsity of a subject and explore it in all different aspects one is blind. I suspect that the few individuals who have gotten closest to the truth are the historians who have access to the historical records and have done their research and have been free to publish their findings. Does such a situation exist in the West today? To ask the question is to answer it.
What is impossible to deny is that man’s inhumanity to his fellow man appears to have no boundaries-.
Blue eyes = white in my book.Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Graham, @Jay Fink, @anon
I have blue eyes. I don’t look stereotypically Jewish. Anyone who sees me thinks white guy, Jewish doesn’t enter their mind. Because of this I expected my DNA results to show I was not fully Jewish, even if I know all my relatives are Jewish. I was actually surprised to see I am 99.6% Jewish (and 0.4% Eastern European). Apparently I’m not all that unusual. Many Jewish people could easily pass as gentiles. My (unpopular here) opinion is Jews are white…not Anglo-Saxons but somewhere under the white umbrella.
Art Deco has quite a strange perspective on the US and the world. At least for someone who hangs around these parts. In 2023, no less.
More frequent commenters will know him better and probably have decided what his deal is (malevolent? just weirdly naive?), but I remain confused.Replies: @deep anonymous
“More frequent commenters will know him better and probably have decided what his deal is (malevolent? just weirdly naive?), but I remain confused.”
You’re not alone. He appears for some unknown reason to be a gentile who is rabidly pro-Israel and philo-Semitic. I don’t care to speculate why, that is just my possibly flawed observation.
But we are talking here about inherited traits across a whole ethnic group. And there ae two basic facts here:
A) There is a huge range of variation in character traits within any particular ethnic group.
Have I known any Jewish guys who were obnoxiously loud and aggressive? Sure, but I also had a Jewish-American friend who was very smart but also reserved and self-deprecating. And my Israeli friend from grad school was around the American median in terms of most of his behavioral traits (though much smarter than most people in any ethnic group).
And we know why this is: google "evolutionarily stable strategy." Any large human population tends to have some bullies and some wimps, some extroverts and some introverts, and so on.
B) And history and culture tend to trump genetics for the large-scale behavioral and character traits within large groups.
How do I know this?
Look at the historical record: German behavior in the early 1940s was radically different from German behavior in the 1960s. Why? Because defeat in WW II and the Occupation significantly changed German culture over a very short time period, even though the gene pool was not significantly different.
There are countless other examples of this sort: history and culture can change very, very fast, in less than a decade. The gene pool can change, but much more slowly.
Point 3 that you quoted is relevant here:Yes.
Many of the comments here, as is of course typical of the Web, come from people who have acquired a small amount of knowledge of some subject and, based on that very limited knowledge, form a completely new, and quite unfounded world-view.
As I said above, sure, everyone has always known that some behavioral tendencies are (partially) heritable. Behavioral genetics is filling in details on that very basic, age-old "folk knowledge."
But behavioral genetics does not, cannot, and never will refute what we all also know: there is dramatic variation within any ethnic group, and average behavior within any ethnic group is seriously malleable by culture and history.
Again, some people who have learned a small amount of science let their simple-minded understanding distort and blow away what is clearly true and what they themselves know, if only they think about it.
Which is not wise.
A bit like the poor fools who claim that Einstein proved that "everything is relative." Which of course he did not (and he never claimed to).Replies: @deep anonymous
“Look at the historical record: German behavior in the early 1940s was radically different from German behavior in the 1960s. Why? Because defeat in WW II and the Occupation significantly changed German culture over a very short time period, even though the gene pool was not significantly different.”
The German gene pool was not significantly different after millions of their most capable young men were killed in the war and the aftermath? Count me skeptical.
On the other hand, I concur that psychological techniques/propaganda/brainwashing can sway large numbers of people within a relatively short time (that is, a few decades). Witness what has happened in U.S. schools and universities just within my lifetime. Or compare polling regarding “same-sex marriage” from, say, 1995 to today.
Anyway, the Nazis drafted young men: it seems unlikely that those who died differed all that much in genetic behavioral tendencies from those who survived. But, in any case, it was irrelevant to the cohorts who were adults in 1960.
da also wrote:Right.
There almost certainly are some genetic difference in average behavioral tendencies among different human populations. But the evidence is that, at the population level, they are swamped by culture and history.
The one exception is probably IQ: even there, one culture can emphasize learning and analytical thinking more than another and thereby have a big collective impact.
But, in the end, a moron is still a moron.
In fact, Israel is the principal example today of a national socialist state. National socialism for me, not for thee.
I wonder about that, as during the war the Germans were quite capable of using captive Jewish talent, notably in Operation Bernhard. Jewish inmates who ranged from former bank officials to professional currency forgers created counterfeit Allied currency.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Bernhard
Putting captive scientists to work on the atom bomb should have been possible.
Blue eyes = white in my book.Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Graham, @Jay Fink, @anon
There are black-as-night African women in some Caribbean Islands with emerald green eyes. They have been living there for hundreds of years, likely brought over during the slave trade, and the belief among anthropologists is that they picked up their striking green eyes from French admixture.
Seems to me that was far more true in Ukraine than Gaza. Were you speaking up about it then?
==
Which ‘then’ and in what discussion?
From the same page:Do you agree with this statement from the same source?Replies: @lavoisier, @res
Note how I introduced that link: “This page has a partial list of slave ships owned by Jews and additional references.” I included Part I for completeness because the original link was broken.
Using “that kind of crap” as a source of further references can be helpful. Especially since much of that information seems to be scrubbed from more reputable sources. But is there if one looks hard enough in older (e.g. contemporary/primary) references.
Not sure. Much depends on how literally “6 million” is taken. But any critical discussion of that number seems to be forbidden so I guess the distinction does not matter to you.
Here is one take Ron Unz offered on that number.
https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/
P.S. No response to the Aaron Lopez part of my comment?
Your factoid ignores the slave trade period from 1713 - 1761. Second, you name a single confidently identified Portuguese Jew. Have you ever tried to identify Iberian Jews by surname? I have, it’s tougher than for Northern European Jews, at least for me and Iberian Jews were thicker on the ground in North and South America in the early years than is commonly imagined. This occurred for several reasons, first and foremost the policies of the Spanish Crown incentivized it and second many converted to Christianity over time.
Jack’s snark aside, the NOI book from several years ago was given serious treatment by at least one influential publication because it relied on Jewish sources to get around the problem of identification by name. For whatever reason, Jews weren’t as circumspect about their role in the slave trade in the past nor did they inflate it. The summary of their involvement from these Jewish sources was very involved in initial years to less involved in later years, years that corresponded with a rise in Yankee traders. Also, bear in mind that domestic and Caribbean slave breeding was a going concern by the mid 18th century diverting much of the market in slaves away from continental trading.Replies: @res, @Corvinus
Ron Unz on the NOI book.
https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-oddities-of-the-jewish-religion/
I thought Ron wrote more on this topic, but am not finding anything. Anyone have a link?
This recent NOI article on unz.com has more on the slave trade.
https://www.unz.com/article/jewish-scholarship-exterminated-by-new-anti-semitism-definition/
Here is a 2019 article from when Amazon banned The Secret Relationship series.
https://www.unz.com/article/amazon-bans-the-secret-relationship-between-blacks-jews/
==
Which 'then' and in what discussion?Replies: @res
“Then” meaning any time since the 2022 Russian invasion of the Ukraine. “In what discussion”? Any discussion on unz.com here since then. There have been many. Both as post topics and off topic comment digressions.
For completeness, speaking up about “it” meaning statements of Russia committing war crimes in the Ukraine. And in the same dismissive fashion you did in this thread about the statements of Israel committing war crimes in Gaza.
The terrorist plan to blow up La Familia Sagrada was nipped in the bud. George Orwell, not a fan of Gaudi’s work, would have been disappointed. From his Homage to Catalonia:
“John Podhoretz: “Jews Are Not White” ”
So what the hell have you guys been doing for 2,000+ yrs? Trying to pass? You certainly aren’t black, Hispanic, or (East/South) Asian. So what’s going on, and why have you been trying to pass?
Because most of you certainly, uh, what’s the word looking for…you certainly LOOK white, you know…
Also remember, these young anti-Israel communists do not hate Israel because it's pro-LGBT or whatever. They hate Israel because they are anti-white, and they consider Israel white.Replies: @Corvinus, @Colin Wright
Does the same reasoning apply to, say, the annihilation of the Third Reich, or the Soviet Union? After all, they too were ideological constructs.
You would argue that to oppose them was evidence of bigotry aimed at Germans or Russians.
It’s perfectly possible to not mind Jews at all — and yet to insist that there shouldn’t be a Jewish supremacist state in Palestine.
I didn’t notice anyone doing that.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/some-technical-details-on-how-the-ukrainians-pulled-off-their-strategic-feint/#comment-5540329
Jack D has a rather different sensitivity to war crimes when they are committed against Ukrainians than when they are committed against Gazans.Replies: @Twinkie, @Art Deco
Here is an example.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/some-technical-details-on-how-the-ukrainians-pulled-off-their-strategic-feint/#comment-5540329
Jack D has a rather different sensitivity to war crimes when they are committed against Ukrainians than when they are committed against Gazans.
The German gene pool was not significantly different after millions of their most capable young men were killed in the war and the aftermath? Count me skeptical.
On the other hand, I concur that psychological techniques/propaganda/brainwashing can sway large numbers of people within a relatively short time (that is, a few decades). Witness what has happened in U.S. schools and universities just within my lifetime. Or compare polling regarding "same-sex marriage" from, say, 1995 to today.Replies: @PhysicistDave
deep anonymous wrote to me:
Germans who were adults in 1960 had already been born before WW II. So, the war did not change their gene pool.
Anyway, the Nazis drafted young men: it seems unlikely that those who died differed all that much in genetic behavioral tendencies from those who survived. But, in any case, it was irrelevant to the cohorts who were adults in 1960.
da also wrote:
Right.
There almost certainly are some genetic difference in average behavioral tendencies among different human populations. But the evidence is that, at the population level, they are swamped by culture and history.
The one exception is probably IQ: even there, one culture can emphasize learning and analytical thinking more than another and thereby have a big collective impact.
But, in the end, a moron is still a moron.
Jay Fink wrote to Robertson:
You need to be pretty careful with those DNA results.
The DNA evidence seems to show that Ashkenazi Jews have a substantial Italian ancestry: the place that analyzed your DNA probably noticed that was typical of American Jews, and so jut lumped that in with “Jewish” DNA.
And then there are Ethiopian Jews who probably share very little DNA with you! Mizrahim are no doubt in between. “Jews” in general do not really comprise a biological group. But Ashkenazim are indeed an ethnic group.
Jay also wrote:
Which, not long ago, everyone took for granted.
In the last few decades, there has been a big influx of Russian Jews into the US: Max Boot, just to name one couple. Boot is, of course, a pompous jerk, but no one has worried about the ability of people like him to assimilate to America on the grounds that they are not White Europeans.
They clearly are.
I have endorsed the phrase in that sense myself: ideally, I think the Zionists should leave and just let the Palestinians have their country back.
Of course, I know this will not happen. The best that can be hoped for is a secular, democratic state that treats Jews and Arabs equally.
The confusion here is, I think, more subtle than you may realize. The "annihilation" of the state of Israel or "wiping Israel off the map" need not mean killing any Israeli Jews at all.
After all, Czechoslovakia was "wiped off the map" with no bloodshed at all that I recall.
And the Soviet state was indeed "annihilated" with minimal bloodshed.
Uncritical defenders of the actions of the government of Israel are acting as if those of us who criticize those actions want to kill all of the Israeli Jews.
But I, and many critics of Israel, including, I am sure, you, do not want to kill any Israeli Jews at all.
I want an end to the killing as soon as possible.
But I do think that a lasting peace will require serious changes in the governance structure in the Southern Levant. Yes, "from the river to the sea."
Do you notice, by the way, that you, Jack,D, and I are partially on the same side in the debate in this thread? Our Jew-hating friends are making such outrageous claims that they are bringing us all together, just because we are pointing out obvious facts.Replies: @Mr. Anon
And who would administer such a state? Vulcans? It would take a purely fictional people with no interest at stake to do it.
Why shouldn’t Jews have their own state? And exclusive use of that state?
The best that could be hoped for is a nation state for each group, Jews and Arabs, where neither is under the control of the other. That’s probably not going to happen either.
In any event, I don’t see that any of it is my concern, and I don’t see why the government of my country should make it my concern.
Woudd it be a mess? Yep. There would be fights over the equivalent of Affirmative Action and reparations for the Palestinians.
In the end, I think most Jews would choose, over a few decades, to emigrate, probably to the US.
Which would be for the best -- Ashkenazi Jews never belonged there. They were Europeans.
As the protesters keep insisting, the "Jewish State" is indeed the last hurrah of European colonialism.
Mr. Anon also wrote:You mean, aside from the fact that they literally stole the actual physical homes of Palestinians? And that that is a crime?
Why shouldn't atheists raised in a Southern Baptist family like me have our own state? Why shouldn't the Baha'is have their own state? Or the Scientologists?
The whole idea is sick and bizarre -- it is in fact the same reasoning Hitler used to argue that Germans deserved their own state that was "Judenfrei ." Lots and lots of innocent people have died because of this crackpot idea.
Mr. Anon also wrote:A true "two-state solution" means the Palestinians can get real weapons and we get ongoing warfare with a vengeance!
Again, ballots are better than bullets.
Mr. Anon also wrote:Unfortunately, the US government has been in this mess up to its neck since 1948. And so you and I are involved whether we like it or not.Replies: @Mr. Anon
This is a great approach if you 12 and are deciding who can come in your treehouse that will only fit 3 kids but the stupidest possible approach in a democracy where you want to get as many people as possible onto your side. Even if Hibernian's views are sympathetic to yours, he can't be in your little club anyway because he's not white enough. Then you will complain that too many (Catholics, Jews, etc.) vote Democrat - geez I wonder why?Replies: @Colin Wright, @Johann Ricke
This kind of thing isn’t unique. When the Arabs who joined up early on with Muhammad built their empire, they wanted to limit all the important jobs not just to Arabs, but to their circle of Muhammad cronies. As time went on, apart from lip service, not only did this circle become less important, the idea of this aristocratic caste fell by the wayside altogether.
The problem this idea ran into? All leadership cliques are coalitions of individuals – almost like athletic teams. They don’t want people with the same backgrounds so much as they want people who can get it done and people they have come to trust. The reality is that in dynastic politics as in business, fathers will shiv sons and vice versa, siblings will shiv each other. So in the end, you had mixed coalitions of Arabs, Persians, Turks, Armenians and Kurds squaring off against each other.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/some-technical-details-on-how-the-ukrainians-pulled-off-their-strategic-feint/#comment-5540329
Jack D has a rather different sensitivity to war crimes when they are committed against Ukrainians than when they are committed against Gazans.Replies: @Twinkie, @Art Deco
100% agreed.
https://www.unz.com/isteve/some-technical-details-on-how-the-ukrainians-pulled-off-their-strategic-feint/#comment-5540329
Jack D has a rather different sensitivity to war crimes when they are committed against Ukrainians than when they are committed against Gazans.Replies: @Twinkie, @Art Deco
I don’t remember the post and did not participate in that comment thread.
Your factoid ignores the slave trade period from 1713 - 1761. Second, you name a single confidently identified Portuguese Jew. Have you ever tried to identify Iberian Jews by surname? I have, it’s tougher than for Northern European Jews, at least for me and Iberian Jews were thicker on the ground in North and South America in the early years than is commonly imagined. This occurred for several reasons, first and foremost the policies of the Spanish Crown incentivized it and second many converted to Christianity over time.
Jack’s snark aside, the NOI book from several years ago was given serious treatment by at least one influential publication because it relied on Jewish sources to get around the problem of identification by name. For whatever reason, Jews weren’t as circumspect about their role in the slave trade in the past nor did they inflate it. The summary of their involvement from these Jewish sources was very involved in initial years to less involved in later years, years that corresponded with a rise in Yankee traders. Also, bear in mind that domestic and Caribbean slave breeding was a going concern by the mid 18th century diverting much of the market in slaves away from continental trading.Replies: @res, @Corvinus
“Your factoid ignores the slave trade period from 1713 – 1761…Second, you name a single confidently identified Portuguese Jew.”
That may be, but the fact remains that non-Jews figured much more prominently in the American slave trade than Jews. Perhaps YOU have a source for that time period to support YOUR contention that Jews were much more important?
“Have you ever tried to identify Iberian Jews by surname? I have, it’s tougher than for Northern European Jews, at least for me and Iberian Jews were thicker on the ground in North and South America in the early years than is commonly imagined.”
I assume that you have sources showing that Iberian Jews played a vital role in the American slave trade? Seems to me you are diverting attention to the facts I offered.
“Jack’s snark aside, the NOI book from several years ago was given serious treatment by at least one influential publication because it relied on Jewish sources to get around the problem of identification by name.”
Citations required on your part here to justify your contention.
“The summary of their involvement from these Jewish sources was very involved in initial years to less involved in later years, years that corresponded with a rise in Yankee traders.”
Again, you are making a charge here. Support it with evidence.
But I don't recall a powerful Korean minority in America agitating for this side or the other in 1950 or did I not read enough American history? I have this crazy notion that America went to war in Korea in 1950 for its own strategic, anti-communist reasons, not because of a strong pressure from the pro-South Korea lobby (like AIPAC) in the U.S.South Koreans are, by and large, quite grateful for that. Indeed, something like 400,000 South Korean soldiers died fighting alongside those American troops. As hundreds of thousands more South Korean soldiers and marines later fought in Vietnam. There is a history of alliance and shedding blood together between the two countries.I think we should withdraw our troops from South Korea, for sure. I'm on record as stating that we should withdraw all our troops abroad, except perhaps the U.K. and Japan (as insurance against future global conflicts).Well, I assume this is meant to be a comparison to Jewish-Americans, not Israelis since we are talking about meriting a place as a fellow American in America... in which case it's hard to assess the net contribution of Korean-Americans since their size and influence have been small at best and, crucially, they evince a high degree of assimilation. Koreans in America, like the Japanese before them, just melt into the majority population. But whatever the merits of their case, I certainly would argue that America needs no more immigrants from South Korea (which, also like Japan, obligingly is sending an ever-declining number of them each year in any case).When was the last time you saw South Korea use American billions in aid and free weaponry to bomb and kill neighboring civilians by the thousands?
When was the last time a rabidly partisan South Korean diaspora in America agitated for American support for South Korean military action beyond its borders?
When was the last time powerful Korean oligarchs and elites in America threatened the job prospects of young and idiotic anti-South Korea college protesters and otherwise engaged in attempts to silence their critics and curtail the freedom of speech?
Do you want me to keep going?
Now you answer my question: why is it wherever Jews go, they are mysteriously afflicted by "anti-Semitism" while, wherever Koreans go, there seems to be, equally mysteriously, no "anti-Koreanism" (excepting, of course, black ghettoes c. 1992) and, if anything, there are frequent appraisals as patriotic, model-minorities?
Do you really want a vote and find out?Replies: @Corvinus
“Now you answer my question: why is it wherever Jews go, they are mysteriously afflicted by “anti-Semitism” while, wherever Koreans go, there seems to be, equally mysteriously, no “anti-Koreanism” (excepting, of course, black ghettoes c. 1992) and, if anything, there are frequent appraisals as patriotic, model-minorities?”
JFC, you are neck deep in false equivalence here.
“they evince a high degree of assimilation. Koreans in America, like the Japanese before them, just melt into the majority population.”
Not according to WASPs. Not according to “Heritage Americans”. Allegedly, right? A good deal of members from this group you desperately want to be included HATES you, especially since you race mixed. I thought race mixing is “anti-white”. I haven’t NOTICED if Mr. Sailer has come out and denounced mixed marriages and the during of offspring. Perhaps YOU can enlighten us regarding his position.
Remember, Asians who came to our great land were looked by these patriots as being unfit to be an American. Apparently, the Immigration Law of 1790 was designed only to entice white Europeans of good moral standing to emigrate. So, what changed, magic dirt?
Yeah. I know that. And? A work of fiction can’t be propaganda?
ATLANTIC: Is Literature ‘the Most Important Weapon of Propaganda’?
Stalin thought so. So, apparently, did the CIA, according to a new account of how the U.S. secretly distributed Doctor Zhivago in the Soviet Union.
Why shouldn't Jews have their own state? And exclusive use of that state?
The best that could be hoped for is a nation state for each group, Jews and Arabs, where neither is under the control of the other. That's probably not going to happen either.
In any event, I don't see that any of it is my concern, and I don't see why the government of my country should make it my concern.Replies: @HammerJack, @PhysicistDave
Who knows? Maybe they should! Only, there are a few complicating factors. For example, they hijack the political process in other countries in order to sponsor their theft of land for this purpose, and then the dispossession and genocide of the people who happened to live in the place they chose.
And—once their goal is attained— they intensify rather than relinquish their stranglehold upon the nations they hijacked. Then, they focus on the destruction of those nations. Just for starters. What’s not to like?
JFC, you are neck deep in false equivalence here.
“they evince a high degree of assimilation. Koreans in America, like the Japanese before them, just melt into the majority population.”
Not according to WASPs. Not according to “Heritage Americans”. Allegedly, right? A good deal of members from this group you desperately want to be included HATES you, especially since you race mixed. I thought race mixing is “anti-white”. I haven’t NOTICED if Mr. Sailer has come out and denounced mixed marriages and the during of offspring. Perhaps YOU can enlighten us regarding his position.
Remember, Asians who came to our great land were looked by these patriots as being unfit to be an American. Apparently, the Immigration Law of 1790 was designed only to entice white Europeans of good moral standing to emigrate. So, what changed, magic dirt?Replies: @HammerJack
I believe a celebration is in order? This appears to be the 10,000th occurrence of Corvy whispering in the ears of anyone who’ll listen: “Pssst, those white people over there? They really hate you! You should hate them too!”
When challenged, he follows up with “I found a hundred year old quote from Madison Grant that proves everything!
Why shouldn't Jews have their own state? And exclusive use of that state?
The best that could be hoped for is a nation state for each group, Jews and Arabs, where neither is under the control of the other. That's probably not going to happen either.
In any event, I don't see that any of it is my concern, and I don't see why the government of my country should make it my concern.Replies: @HammerJack, @PhysicistDave
Mr. Anon asked me:
Politics. Compromise. Ballots are better than bullets.
Woudd it be a mess? Yep. There would be fights over the equivalent of Affirmative Action and reparations for the Palestinians.
In the end, I think most Jews would choose, over a few decades, to emigrate, probably to the US.
Which would be for the best — Ashkenazi Jews never belonged there. They were Europeans.
As the protesters keep insisting, the “Jewish State” is indeed the last hurrah of European colonialism.
Mr. Anon also wrote:
You mean, aside from the fact that they literally stole the actual physical homes of Palestinians? And that that is a crime?
Why shouldn’t atheists raised in a Southern Baptist family like me have our own state? Why shouldn’t the Baha’is have their own state? Or the Scientologists?
The whole idea is sick and bizarre — it is in fact the same reasoning Hitler used to argue that Germans deserved their own state that was “Judenfrei .” Lots and lots of innocent people have died because of this crackpot idea.
Mr. Anon also wrote:
A true “two-state solution” means the Palestinians can get real weapons and we get ongoing warfare with a vengeance!
Again, ballots are better than bullets.
Mr. Anon also wrote:
Unfortunately, the US government has been in this mess up to its neck since 1948. And so you and I are involved whether we like it or not.
Rodney King's plea - "Can't we all just get along" - just doesn't work. No, often times we can't all just get along.Actually, lots of innocent people have died from imperial governments forcing disparate peoples to live amongst each other.Ballots are often rigged, and what they achieve is illusory. Bullets are real.Yes, that's true. But the way to stop it is to..............stop it. If we actually had a government that represented us (we don't), we could just say "Under new management. We no longer care about your millenia-old squabbles. We're outta here!"
It’s always bizarre and a bit amusing-perplexing when commenters such as Corvinus or PhysicistDave write that “white people” are talking badly about me behind my back or something.
I am married to a white lady. I am pretty much an adopted son in her family (I literally farmed some of her ancestral lands alongside her folks for a while, and, delightfully I might add, one of her cousins – a Navy helo pilot – literally flew me in one of my overseas assignments and I gave him my handgun, which he carried for the rest of his tour). These are my people and I am theirs. My kids are treasured grand kids and nephews/nieces and cousins to them. They would all die to a person to defend me and my children, as my children and I would do for them.
I guess these commenters don’t really have people of their own and don’t know what it’s like to belong to a real, organic community and that’s why they write stuff like this.
So many lies have been told about the holocaust and so many laws have been constructed to force one to believe in one specific narrative that what one believes becomes irrelevant. In many jurisdictions in the so called freedom loving West doubting the holocaust narrative is a crime.
I remain agnostic on the matter as I have no way of determining what is true or false about the subject given the constraints that have been placed on all of us about this one historical event. If one cannot determine the truth or the falsity of a subject and explore it in all different aspects one is blind. I suspect that the few individuals who have gotten closest to the truth are the historians who have access to the historical records and have done their research and have been free to publish their findings. Does such a situation exist in the West today? To ask the question is to answer it.
What is impossible to deny is that man's inhumanity to his fellow man appears to have no boundaries-.Replies: @Steve Sailer
Where’d they go? And why didn’t they ever write?
Historically, Christians were the ones who allegorized the Bible, not Jews (with a few exceptions like Philo Judaeus).
I don't know much about how Jews interpreted those morally repellent passages throughout history. But, it remains a thorny issue. And one should also add that Christians adopted those stories & I am not aware they were morally outraged by those genocidal passages about Amalekites & other sanctified killings. Perhaps Gnostic Marcion was, post festum, morally right when he wanted all Christians to dump the entire Hebrew Bible.
Something can be gleaned from Paul's attitude towards these stories. He is always talking about the Law & theological-spiritual topics, but never addresses "unpleasant", genocidal parts. It could be - and I may be wrong here - that Jewish rabbis were selective readers, cherry-picking parts that could be justified by more or less universal conscience & skipping over the genocidal porn. And, on the other hand, they could have swallowed it all, hook, line & sinker, thus making historical Judaism a culture possessing a strong pathological, murderous exclusivity & genocidal hysterical lineaments.
This is a serious issue, because Dostoevsky had been justifying his anti-judaism by explicitly addressing those passages & rhetorically asking: what if Jews were numerically superior to Russians & had the upper hand- would they systematically murder them as they did all those peoples enumerated in the Hebrew Bible?
Being chosen is not such a big deal. I think Zoroastrians have this element, too. But their scriptures do not contain explicit proto- Hitlerian passages.Replies: @Hibernian
The answer given to me and others by a priest in an OT class at a Catholic college in 1972 was that it was an early stage of development. That makes sense to me. That behavior is concentrated in the earlier books of the OT. The massacre of the Holy Innocents was ordered by a Roman puppet.
Another counterpoint to the notion that there’s no Anti-Catholicism on this site.
I'm not saying that all Irishmen are dumb. I'm just saying that the ones they got to front Hart-Cellar were. Ted Kennedy was not exactly the sharpest arrow in the Kennedy quill.
1929-1945, 16 of those years, we were preoccupied with a Depression and World War. 1945-1956, another 9 years, we were preoccupied with the fallout from that War, especially the rise of Communism.
That’s wonderful you, like I, disavow white nationalism and are willing to bring Twinkie into the white American fold on Thanksgiving.
Woudd it be a mess? Yep. There would be fights over the equivalent of Affirmative Action and reparations for the Palestinians.
In the end, I think most Jews would choose, over a few decades, to emigrate, probably to the US.
Which would be for the best -- Ashkenazi Jews never belonged there. They were Europeans.
As the protesters keep insisting, the "Jewish State" is indeed the last hurrah of European colonialism.
Mr. Anon also wrote:You mean, aside from the fact that they literally stole the actual physical homes of Palestinians? And that that is a crime?
Why shouldn't atheists raised in a Southern Baptist family like me have our own state? Why shouldn't the Baha'is have their own state? Or the Scientologists?
The whole idea is sick and bizarre -- it is in fact the same reasoning Hitler used to argue that Germans deserved their own state that was "Judenfrei ." Lots and lots of innocent people have died because of this crackpot idea.
Mr. Anon also wrote:A true "two-state solution" means the Palestinians can get real weapons and we get ongoing warfare with a vengeance!
Again, ballots are better than bullets.
Mr. Anon also wrote:Unfortunately, the US government has been in this mess up to its neck since 1948. And so you and I are involved whether we like it or not.Replies: @Mr. Anon
No, PD, yours is the crackpot idea.
Different peoples are different. And those differences are real. That is a contingent fact of nature.
Rodney King’s plea – “Can’t we all just get along” – just doesn’t work. No, often times we can’t all just get along.
Actually, lots of innocent people have died from imperial governments forcing disparate peoples to live amongst each other.
Ballots are often rigged, and what they achieve is illusory. Bullets are real.
Yes, that’s true. But the way to stop it is to…………..stop it. If we actually had a government that represented us (we don’t), we could just say “Under new management. We no longer care about your millenia-old squabbles. We’re outta here!”
That isn’t anti-Catholic. It’s not even anti-Irish.
I’m not saying that all Irishmen are dumb. I’m just saying that the ones they got to front Hart-Cellar were. Ted Kennedy was not exactly the sharpest arrow in the Kennedy quill.
https://slatestarcodex.com/2016/03/16/non-shared-environment-doesnt-just-mean-schools-and-peers/
Then Scarlett JOhansson and Natalie Portman are blacks or Redskins or Chinese (yellow) or brown?
According to Bertram W. Korn’s research (Jews and Negro Slavery in the Old South, 1789-1865), census records and slave purchasing documents show that southern Jews “who owned slaves were concentrated in cities, not in the plantation districts containing ninety percent of the enslaved population. For example, there were only four Jews – less than one-tenth of one percent – among the 11,000 Southerners who in 1830 owned fifty or more slaves.”
According to David Brion Davis, Professor of History Emeritus at Yale University, he writes “To keep matters in perspective, we should note that in the American South, in 1830, there were only 120 Jews among the 45,000 slaveholders owning twenty or more slaves and only twenty Jews among the 12,000 slaveholders owning fifty or more slaves. Even if each member of this Jewish slaveholding elite had owned 714 slaves—a ridiculously high figure in the American South—the total number would only equal the 100,000 slaves owned by black and colored planters in St. Domingue in 1789, on the eve of the Haitian Revolution…Of course, some Jews were involved in the slave trade. Every European Western nation was. There were also some regions in which the slave trade was more accessible to Jews—Rhode Island, Newport, Holland, to name a few striking examples. The Dutch Jews weren’t persecuted, so there were quite a few who were involved.”
From 1709-1807, there are 934 recorded voyages in which Rhode Island merchants were responsible for procuring 106,000 slaves. Now, Jews arrived in Newport as early as 1658. On the eve of the Revolution, they were estimated to be around thirty families. According to historical records used (e.g. naval office shipping lists, censuses, tax records) that identified merchants and planters as Jewish, there were 347 slave ships sent to Africa by Rhode Island slave traders from 1761-1774, with 21 being funded by Aaron Lopez, a Portuguese Jew. That means 326 voyages were underwritten by non-Jews during this time frame.
Of course, Jews played a role in the peddling of human flesh. The extent would appear to pale in comparison to other European ethnic groups.Replies: @Curle, @Colin Wright
This is only convincing if we assume that Aaron Lopez was the only Jew in Rhode Island.
Hollywood? Are you serious? Hollywood was a glorious jewel in mankind’s crown. One of the greatest collective accomplishments of the 20th century. It’s over, but all things must pass, and anyway we will never run out of old movies to watch, so it does not really matter.
I acknowledge the contribution of both Jews and gentiles, of course.
John Podhoretz, it should be noted, is one of the all-time Regressions to the Mean, up there with the Rockefellers, the Kennedys, and the Cuomos. Rotten luck for Midge and Norman.