[go: up one dir, main page]

The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
What's the New Current Thing?

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

From my new column in Taki’s Magazine:

What’s the New Current Thing?
Steve Sailer

February 28, 2024

I’m not much in the business of making predictions about the future, because it’s hard enough to understand what’s happening in the present. I don’t forecast the next big thing so much as try to notice the current thing. My goal is to be a historian of the present.

Back in May 2013, I discerned that The New York Times was promoting as the successor to gay marriage—as that triumphant campaign entered its shooting-the-wounded phase—transgenderism. This seemed bizarre at the time, but transgenderism indeed proved to be the New Current Thing, with catastrophic consequences for impressionable and moody young girls.

What’s next? Many on the right argued that it had to be pedophilia, mostly because that grossed them out the most. But all the trends point in the opposite direction: For example, the woke are increasingly disgusted by the thought of a 35-year-old man marrying a 25-year-old woman (presumably, a trend driven by all the single 35-year-old women fearing being permanently left on the shelf by single 35-year-old men).

Read the whole thing there.

 
Hide 410 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. No, polyamory can’t be a thing.

    I’ve been sniffing new prudishness coming on fast. The whole feeling of ick for the 40-year-old guy hitting on a twenty-something female itself doesn’t gross anyone out. It’s an opportunity to register disgust for complicated sexual situations.

    In the 1970s for a brief time and thanks to the Jesus Freaks, a New Chastity was going around. They call it something different every time… this time it’s starting in odd places like Men Going Their Own Way. In the seventies, it was Joyce Maynard calling all men pigs. But the same tune all the same.

    • Replies: @Jonathan Mason
    @Franz

    The whole idea that couples must be very close together in age, preferably so that they would have been higschoolers or college students at the same time seems to be very American (US) and is much less common in other nations.

    More common in other countries is that a man establishes himself econonomically either by having a successful career or inheriting through a family business or deceased parents, and then looks for a wife who is young, energetic, and fertile to have his children.

    Men, even at the age of 70 are capable of fathering children, but women not so much so.

    Replies: @Bill Jones, @BB753, @Thea, @ben tillman, @oliver elkington

    , @Ebony Obelisk
    @Franz

    If you’re a 30 year old cos bet white male and you’re it harried have multiple children age height six fighters then you are a lowers

    Replies: @kaganovitch, @Je Suis Omar Mateen

  2. What’s the New Current Thing?

    Thanks to Boomers, a gerontocracy and dementia.

    • Replies: @ic1000
    @Voltarde

    > What’s the New Current Thing? Thanks to Boomers, a gerontocracy and dementia.

    As Trotsky quipped, "You may not be interested in Unfunded Liabilities and Currency Collapse, but they are interested in you."

    1. Since the U.S. is still in the gradually phase, this won't be the next New Current Thing.

    2. Given the NYT's exquisite aversion to offending the amour propre of its paying subscribers, the acticle count will be a lagging rather than leading indicator of this exciting trend.

    Replies: @slumber_j

    , @Reg Cæsar
    @Voltarde


    What’s the New Current Thing?

    Thanks to Boomers...
     

    I was going to say fools and morons pushing tenuous "generation" labels, but that's been a Thing for a while now, hasn't it?

    Replies: @duncsbaby

    , @mc23
    @Voltarde

    Hey, the oldest Boomer is only 78. Our political leadership is older. But are they really running things or is the hand that rocks the wheelchair?

  3. What’s the New Current Thing?

    I don’t know, but I know who’ll be supporting it.

  4. A lot of polygamous men from the developing world have 2nd or 3rd wives who are much younger.
    Will that be accepted by New York Times readers ? (and no, not asking for a friend).

  5. Pedophilia is only “taboo” when older straight non-alpha men go for younger but legal women.

    Pedophilia is just fine when older women teachers go for their students — many of them don’t see jail, or only have light sentences. And homosexuals are very strongly pushing to lower or remove the ages of consent or reduce penalties for violating it, as they already have in your California. Jean Paul-Sarte and Ruth Bader Ginsburg live again!

    No, the future is that straight men who aren’t Chads will be legally restricted from dating any woman not approved by the hens. Likely, it will require a local Coven of Women to vote on such matters.

    Meanwhile, 8 year olds will be raped by gay 50 year olds and it will be celebrated.

    • Agree: Almost Missouri, AndrewR
    • Replies: @Peter Akuleyev
    @R.G. Camara

    Pedophilia is just fine when older women teachers go for their students

    The left wing anti-pedophilia movement is so strong that a 40 year old woman in New Hampshire has just been indicted for having sex with an 18 year old man. She may receive a 3 year jail sentence.

    https://eu.seacoastonline.com/story/news/local/2024/02/14/teacher-accused-of-sex-with-18-year-old-student-to-plead-guilty/72578966007/

    Even 10 years ago I think that would have seemed prima facie ridiculous to 99% of the population.

    Replies: @Almost Missouri

    , @Rich
    @R.G. Camara

    Well, it is different. A grown man can physically force a 15 or 16 year old girl to have sex with him, a grown woman can't physically force a teenage boy to have sex with her. Biologically impossible. And where I grew up, a teenaged boy is going to be overjoyed at having an older woman coming onto him. It should be treated differently because it is different.

    True pedophilia, which is sex with a pre-pubescent child, should of course be punished severely, male or female. I favor the death penalty, but life in prison is probably the best we can hope for in this effeminate society.

    Replies: @SomeGuy852

  6. The New Thing among the masses of Americans is the growing disenchantment about the USA Thingie. Nobody can even define what the USA is anymore.

    Young White men are less likely to be suckered into defending it. There is also a growing disenchantment over the concept of universal rights. In practice, this belief was just a way to cuck White men into working for and dying for others who would never return the favor.

    Look for young White men to stop recognizing and enforcing the “rights” of others.

    • Replies: @mc23
    @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality

    When invade the world has degenerated into massively inviting the world there is nothing left to defend. With open borders there is no nation. As for our armed forces perhaps, nothing has changed but the mask has dropped with the internet. Smedley Butler a Marine Corp General, wrote a book War is a Racket.

    Based on his career military experience, Butler discussed how business interests were behind US interests in foreign interventions. Now it seems Zionist neocons have replaced banana companies.

    White young men hardest hit.

    https://twitter.com/Crypto_Futurist/status/1762592693283102898?s=20

    , @Joe Stalin
    @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality


    In practice, this belief was just a way to cuck White men into working for and dying for others who would never return the favor.
     
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_okL0QwKRo
  7. I’m a younger millennial and I notice that a lot of 30 something’s moving back into their aging boomer parents homes. Economy isn’t good obviously. The next big thing is millennials inheriting their boomer parents empty McMansions?

    • Replies: @Anon7
    @Gruesome Newsom

    I don't know if it will be the "New Thing" but the current thing is leftist state governors trying to convince people to take migrants into their homes.

    So, combining the trend of millennial children moving back into their parent's McMansions, there are still empty rooms. So, fill them with migrants, who can help take care of the aging parents, and since these migrants will collect our tax dollars, they can also contribute some money.

    New business model.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @David Davenport, @Colin Wright

  8. anonymous[393] • Disclaimer says:

    In Los Angeles, it’s idiot negroes leading high speed car chases… every… fucking… day.

    These happened quite recently…

    https://www.youtube.com/live/1cVjjmLFmyo?si=Acm3qUkCMTJxuGJi

    In the vid below, the idiot negro survived, but six others did not. She had multiple reckless driving charges prior to this doozy.

    Question: Are there any stats available delineating the race of the leaders of So. Cal car chases and resulting deaths? I’m doubting it, since the stats would very likely lean absurdly towards negro offenders, enough so that would appear to be “a new thing.”

    • Replies: @Pop Warner
    @anonymous

    I catch a lot of these chases live because they're shared on /pol/ a lot, especially the LA ones because the police procedure is to lay back and local news choppers always need something to do.

    A lot of the suspects are Hispanic, which isn't a surprise considering how Hispanic LA County is. There are some black subjects, and the occasional white suspect (though they're probably Hispanic too).

    , @TWS
    @anonymous

    It's the current and the future. Maybe when they ban all internal combustion vehicles it'll end.

    , @Servenet
    @anonymous

    It's impossible to imagine an America, say, 60 years ago in which the 90% White population could glimpse the future of the utter destructiveness of blacks and not panic to the point of sending them OUT, somewhere, ANYWHERE but in the midst of themselves. A space alien would never believe a species this awful would not only be tolerated among the civilized but its invasiveness would not be checked before a freaking apocalypse overtook it.

  9. Miscegenation for Whites.

    Not new but always a constant massive push by the hostile ruling ‘elite’.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    @Gordo

    "Miscegenation for Whites. Not new but always a constant massive push by the hostile ruling ‘elite’. "

    More like a personal decision by normal people. Well within their liberty. Just ask John Derbyshire.

  10. https://www.moviemaker.com/drive-away-dolls-ethan-coen-tricia-cooke/

    Drive-Away Dolls: How Ethan Coen and Tricia Cooke’s Long Marriage Shaped Their Lesbian Road-Trip Movie

    [MORE]

    […]
    I let Ethan and Joel know that I really wanted to work as an editor, and asked if they had any positions available in New York as an apprentice,” says Cooke. “Apparently they already had an apprentice, but they made room for me too, so that was kind.”

    Cooke hit it off with Ethan Coen almost immediately. But they wanted different things.

    “Ethan asked me on a date and we went to see Drugstore Cowboy,” she says. “I told him, ‘I’m a lesbian, I’m not interested.’”

    So they became friends for a while. But the relationship evolved. They married in 1993, and had two kids.

    They also made amazing films together: Cooke, now very much a fan of the Coens’ work, was the assistant editor of their 1991 film Barton Fink and 1994 follow-up The Hudsucker Proxy. And Cooke became the editor of their 1998 The Big Lebowski, 2000’s O Brother, Where Art Thou?, and 2001’s The Man Who Wasn’t There. She edited the latter with the brothers, who used their editing pseudonym, Roderick Jaynes.

    So they became friends for a while. But the relationship evolved. They married in 1993, and had two kids.

    But sometime after that, Joel and Ethan Coen started using Final Cut to edit. And Cooke came to a personal decision involving her kids.

    “As they got a little older, I realized they were going to grow up and I wasn’t going to be able to spend any time with them if I was in the cutting room 10 to 12 hours a day, which is often the case,” says Cooke. “So I decided to slow down and start writing more.”

    She co-directed a documentary with her friend Jennifer Arnold called Where the Girls Are, a comedic short about the history, parties and conflicts of the Dinah Shore Weekend, a giant lesbian pool party in Palm Springs. It won the Outstanding Narrative Short Film at Outfest in 2003.

    She also co-directed the 2008 short “Don’t Mess With Texas” with Carrie Schrader. Cooke co-wrote the film, about two young lesbians who run into trouble at a diner, with Coen.

    “Being married to Ethan and being queer there’s always a little disconnect sometimes,” she laughs. “I wanted to be able to make queer films as well.”

    Coen and Cooke decided in the aughts that they should write a feature screenplay, which they originally called Drive-Away Dykes.

    “We wrote Drive-Away Dykes together many, many years ago as a way for us to spend time together,” says Cooke.

    By then, the couple were no longer in a traditional partnership.

    “We have a very non-traditional marriage and relationship where there’s a bigger unit,” says Cooke. “I have a partner and Ethan has another partner.”

    She adds: “It’s not easy sometimes and it can be very difficult for even our friends and family to understand. You navigate it one day at a time. We’ve been in this kind of dynamic for over 20 years, and we still take it one day at a time.”

    “It’s funny because our whole relationship is like, “What, me worry?” says Coen, quoting Mad Magazine poster boy Alfred E. Newman. “And that’s also the movie.”

    So that’s the backstory of Drive-Away Dolls. Or Drive-Away Dykes. Whichever you prefer.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drive-Away_Dolls

    https://screenrant.com/drive-away-dolls-movie-box-office-opening-weekend/

    Ethan Coen’s New Movie Has Disastrous Box Office Opening, Misses Top 5 In First Weekend
    The new Ethan Coen movie Drive-Away Dolls barely makes it into the Top 10 in its domestic opening weekend, landing at No. 8 with a paltry debut.

    https://www.slashfilm.com/1526800/ethan-coen-drive-away-dolls-box-office-disappointment/

    Ethan Coen’s Drive-Away Dolls Is A Big Box Office Disappointment

    DRIVE-AWAY DOLLS – Official Trailer [HD] – Only In Theaters February 23

    Jun 23, 2023

    Written by Ethan Coen and Tricia Cooke, this comedy caper follows Jamie, an uninhibited free spirit bemoaning yet another breakup with a girlfriend, and her demure friend Marian who desperately needs to loosen up. In search of a fresh start, the two embark on an impromptu road trip to Tallahassee, but things quickly go awry when they cross paths with a group of inept criminals along the way. Directed by Ethan Coen.

    DRIVE-AWAY DOLLS – Official Trailer 2 [HD] – Only In Theaters February 23

    Feb 6, 2024

    • Replies: @Redneck Farmer
    @MEH 0910

    So apparently bisexuality is lower than queerdom on the intersectionality chart?

    , @BB753
    @MEH 0910

    Is that the next thing? Beta males marrying ugly lesbians?

    Replies: @LG5, @Dutch Boy

    , @SFG
    @MEH 0910

    I can't figure out whether to envy or pity Mr. Coen (is she forcing him to look on while she sleeps around? are they enjoying four-person orgies?), but I'm definitely thinking: don't try this at home.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Barnard, @Reg Cæsar

    , @Muggles
    @MEH 0910

    As if we needed further evidence that many Hollywood films are created by mentally ill moral degenerates.

    Tolerance is one thing; celebration of sickness is quite another.

    Of course some of the latest buzz about American youth suggests that males are afraid of females and females are claiming to be "bisexual" in record numbers.

    I suspect that beneath all of the media hype things are not much different than before.

    "Fear of sex" due to AIDS and mentally ill females can certainly cool the male ardor. As for women, the mad feminist "rage" doesn't just happen once a month. It now becomes a political stance by hating on Jews who for some reason don't like their misogynist, anti gay patriarchal terrorist loving neighbors. But if you have common sense and ignore Woke media, you will be okay.

    Meanwhile rape loving migrants flood into Dem big city strongholds in Europe and the US/Canada.

    What is a boy/girl going to do?

    Many are moving back into mama and daddy's homestead to play video games and stream inane Coen brothers dreck about lesbians.

    I think things are better in Kansas, Dorothy...

    , @anonymous
    @MEH 0910

    Have the Coen brothers split-up professionally ?

    Replies: @MEH 0910

    , @AnotherDad
    @MEH 0910


    Ethan Coen’s New Movie Has Disastrous Box Office Opening, Misses Top 5 In First Weekend
    The new Ethan Coen movie Drive-Away Dolls barely makes it into the Top 10 in its domestic opening weekend, landing at No. 8 with a paltry debut.
     
    LOL.

    Amazing these people can not figure out the obvious. Queers--I mean male queers, the word apparently has been repurposed to something or another--are viscerally disgusting, but lesbians are just boring.

    Women and their stories are interesting because of sex--their capability to make babies with a man. Therefore man-woman coupling, "who will match with and make babies with whom?"--which speaks to lineage and the future--is of some dramatic interest.

    Men can be of interest beyond that. Men make war and ergo decide the fate of nations and empires. Men break the law and other men hunt down and suppress the lawbreakers. Men sail around the world and discover new lands. Men come up with new ideas and inventions and make things that fly and go boom. Some drama.

    Women, strip away sex--the "who will she make babies with"--are rather boring. They ... talk.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Mike Tre, @Twinkie, @Looger, @Jack D, @New Dealer, @R.G. Camara, @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Corvinus

  11. anonymous[242] • Disclaimer says:

    I believe that because Google is an established reservoir of existential evil, and because nobody knows how to even begin to regulate them, they and others of the same evil ilk, like Microsoft and Meta, will vigorously and single-mindedly manipulate their A.I. algorithms to successfully influence the next presidential election in ways we cannot currently imagine.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ai-chatbots-inaccurate-election-information-proof-news/?ref=biztoc.com

  12. @MEH 0910
    https://www.moviemaker.com/drive-away-dolls-ethan-coen-tricia-cooke/

    Drive-Away Dolls: How Ethan Coen and Tricia Cooke’s Long Marriage Shaped Their Lesbian Road-Trip Movie
     

    [...]
    I let Ethan and Joel know that I really wanted to work as an editor, and asked if they had any positions available in New York as an apprentice,” says Cooke. “Apparently they already had an apprentice, but they made room for me too, so that was kind.”

    Cooke hit it off with Ethan Coen almost immediately. But they wanted different things.

    “Ethan asked me on a date and we went to see Drugstore Cowboy,” she says. “I told him, ‘I’m a lesbian, I’m not interested.’”

    So they became friends for a while. But the relationship evolved. They married in 1993, and had two kids.

    They also made amazing films together: Cooke, now very much a fan of the Coens’ work, was the assistant editor of their 1991 film Barton Fink and 1994 follow-up The Hudsucker Proxy. And Cooke became the editor of their 1998 The Big Lebowski, 2000’s O Brother, Where Art Thou?, and 2001’s The Man Who Wasn’t There. She edited the latter with the brothers, who used their editing pseudonym, Roderick Jaynes.

    So they became friends for a while. But the relationship evolved. They married in 1993, and had two kids.

    But sometime after that, Joel and Ethan Coen started using Final Cut to edit. And Cooke came to a personal decision involving her kids.

    “As they got a little older, I realized they were going to grow up and I wasn’t going to be able to spend any time with them if I was in the cutting room 10 to 12 hours a day, which is often the case,” says Cooke. “So I decided to slow down and start writing more.”

    She co-directed a documentary with her friend Jennifer Arnold called Where the Girls Are, a comedic short about the history, parties and conflicts of the Dinah Shore Weekend, a giant lesbian pool party in Palm Springs. It won the Outstanding Narrative Short Film at Outfest in 2003.

    She also co-directed the 2008 short “Don’t Mess With Texas” with Carrie Schrader. Cooke co-wrote the film, about two young lesbians who run into trouble at a diner, with Coen.

    “Being married to Ethan and being queer there’s always a little disconnect sometimes,” she laughs. “I wanted to be able to make queer films as well.”

    Coen and Cooke decided in the aughts that they should write a feature screenplay, which they originally called Drive-Away Dykes.

    “We wrote Drive-Away Dykes together many, many years ago as a way for us to spend time together,” says Cooke.

    By then, the couple were no longer in a traditional partnership.

    “We have a very non-traditional marriage and relationship where there’s a bigger unit,” says Cooke. “I have a partner and Ethan has another partner.”

    She adds: “It’s not easy sometimes and it can be very difficult for even our friends and family to understand. You navigate it one day at a time. We’ve been in this kind of dynamic for over 20 years, and we still take it one day at a time.”

    “It’s funny because our whole relationship is like, “What, me worry?” says Coen, quoting Mad Magazine poster boy Alfred E. Newman. “And that’s also the movie.”

    So that’s the backstory of Drive-Away Dolls. Or Drive-Away Dykes. Whichever you prefer.
     

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drive-Away_Dolls

    https://screenrant.com/drive-away-dolls-movie-box-office-opening-weekend/


    Ethan Coen's New Movie Has Disastrous Box Office Opening, Misses Top 5 In First Weekend
    The new Ethan Coen movie Drive-Away Dolls barely makes it into the Top 10 in its domestic opening weekend, landing at No. 8 with a paltry debut.
     
    https://www.slashfilm.com/1526800/ethan-coen-drive-away-dolls-box-office-disappointment/

    Ethan Coen's Drive-Away Dolls Is A Big Box Office Disappointment
     
    DRIVE-AWAY DOLLS - Official Trailer [HD] - Only In Theaters February 23
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oy0RYiQRWUk
    Jun 23, 2023

    Written by Ethan Coen and Tricia Cooke, this comedy caper follows Jamie, an uninhibited free spirit bemoaning yet another breakup with a girlfriend, and her demure friend Marian who desperately needs to loosen up. In search of a fresh start, the two embark on an impromptu road trip to Tallahassee, but things quickly go awry when they cross paths with a group of inept criminals along the way. Directed by Ethan Coen.
     
    DRIVE-AWAY DOLLS - Official Trailer 2 [HD] - Only In Theaters February 23
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vy_7UGICJU
    Feb 6, 2024

    Replies: @Redneck Farmer, @BB753, @SFG, @Muggles, @anonymous, @AnotherDad

    So apparently bisexuality is lower than queerdom on the intersectionality chart?

  13. ‘Ethan Coen’s New Movie Has Disastrous Box Office Opening, Misses Top 5 In First Weekend’

    You know, lesbians and adult nerds just aren’t all that interesting.

    • Agree: Old Prude
    • Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Unintended Consequence

    More like, the Coen brothers belonged to a now-gone past era when people actually liked movies, implicitly understood the basics of film language, and knew how to parse a particular work. Nobody takes the trouble now to parse a Current Year propaganda cut-your-son's-dick-off clip.

    All dead now. Sort of like opera.

  14. Anonymous[223] • Disclaimer says:

    Interesting, Steve that in the context of traditional Yemeni polygamy you put the words ‘bastard’ and ‘saddle’ together – I don’t know if this was intentional or not.

    Etymologically, we are told, the English word ‘bastard’ is derived from the Norman French ‘fils de bast’ which means ‘son of the pack saddle’, the notion being a man on the road, so to speak, left off illegitimate offspring with some women of easy virtue he met along the way.
    Incidentally, that ancient English army term ‘batman’ meaning a private soldier being assigned as an officer’s body servant is also derived from ‘bast’, meaning saddle in that a big duty of a batman was preparing his master’s pack saddle every morning.

    • Thanks: Almost Missouri
  15. Anonymous[223] • Disclaimer says:

    Shades of that famous Orwell passage in which he lumps together ‘nudists, pacifists, vegetarians and lunatics’.
    That passage always raises a smile with me, with that masterly juxtaposition of ‘nudist’ and ‘lunatic’ with the rest of the soy boys.
    One can almost imagine the straightlaced chain smoking Edwardian gent, Orwell, in his bemused contempt.

    • Thanks: Almost Missouri
    • Replies: @Bill Jones
    @Anonymous

    Thanks for that quote I'd forgotten it.

    As for:


    straightlaced chain smoking Edwardian gent, Orwell
     
    We are talking about the Eric Blair who fought for the communists in the late 1930's?

    Replies: @Anonymous

  16. I’m down for cannibalism, bestiality, necrophilia, pederasty, and coprophilia. Those are all things that trigger extreme disgust, and the Left seems to have this need to cause offense in normal people while calling it a ‘phobia’. The trick is introducing these horrors gradually enough to make them acceptable to their own kind first. First, they’ll have to make the extreme perverts in their ranks appear to be sympathetic victims rather than sick fetishists and lunatics.

    • Replies: @Almost Missouri
    @personfellowindividual


    I’m down for cannibalism
     
    Well, they are putting cannibalism on deck:

    https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg26134783-600-is-it-time-for-a-more-subtle-view-on-the-ultimate-taboo-cannibalism/

    Is it time for a more subtle view on the ultimate taboo: cannibalism?
    New archaeological evidence shows that ancient humans ate each other surprisingly often - sometimes for compassionate reasons. The finds give us an opportunity to reassess our views on the practice

    14 February 2024 .
     
    Valentine's Day!

    Ethically, cannibalism poses fewer issues than you might imagine. If a body can be bequeathed with consent to medical science, why can’t it be left to feed the hungry? Our aversion has been explained in various ways. Perhaps it is down to the fact that, in Western religious traditions, bodies are seen as the seat of the soul and have a whiff of the sacred. Or maybe it is culturally ingrained, with roots in early modern colonialism, when racist stereotypes of the cannibal were concocted to justify subjugation. These came to represent the “other” to Western societies – and revulsion towards cannibalism became a tenet of their moral conscience.

     

    Cannibalismphobia is racism!

    A slew of recent archaeological discoveries is now further complicating how we think about human cannibalism. Researchers have unearthed evidence suggesting that our hominin ancestors ate each other surprisingly often. What’s more, it seems that they weren’t always doing so for the reasons you might expect – for sustenance or to compete against and intimidate rivals – but often as funerary rituals to honour their dead.

    Like it or not, then, cannibalism is an important part of our story. This isn’t to say that we should change our attitudes towards it. But understanding its deep roots might shift our perspective on the few cultures that still practise cannibalism today, albeit only occasionally, such as the Aghori, a Hindu ascetic sect in India that does it in pursuit of transcendence. Above all, these discoveries invite us to reconsider our revulsion to cannibalism in the context of our evolutionary past
     
    "You vill liv in ze pod. You vill eat ze kadavers!"

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Wielgus

  17. The “Next Thing” by definition has to be the most abhorrent thing to the current Orthodoxy. Sexual deviancy just doesn’t have the same kick any more.

    Looking at the demographic trend in the US my guess is serious anti-Semitism. Not “Opposition to full on Zionism is anti-Semitism,” anti-Semitism or “casting a Gentile in a Jewish role is hate,” anti-Semitism, but some serious violence.

    Sincerely hope I’m wrong.

    • Replies: @Anon
    @Nj Transit Commuter

    Some Jew wrote a book about white rural hate blah blah...you should read the x comments! Talk about an awakening, of course he’s crying out in pain.

    Replies: @New Dealer

    , @AndrewR
    @Nj Transit Commuter

    Why do you hope you're wrong?

  18. Immigrants are destroying the standard of living in Western nations.

  19. This makes polygamy expensive for the provider, so it’s fairly rare in the Arab world.

    well it’s not because they don’t want to, it’s because they can’t (see “countries that restrict polygyny”)
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygyny_in_Islam

  20. @MEH 0910
    https://www.moviemaker.com/drive-away-dolls-ethan-coen-tricia-cooke/

    Drive-Away Dolls: How Ethan Coen and Tricia Cooke’s Long Marriage Shaped Their Lesbian Road-Trip Movie
     

    [...]
    I let Ethan and Joel know that I really wanted to work as an editor, and asked if they had any positions available in New York as an apprentice,” says Cooke. “Apparently they already had an apprentice, but they made room for me too, so that was kind.”

    Cooke hit it off with Ethan Coen almost immediately. But they wanted different things.

    “Ethan asked me on a date and we went to see Drugstore Cowboy,” she says. “I told him, ‘I’m a lesbian, I’m not interested.’”

    So they became friends for a while. But the relationship evolved. They married in 1993, and had two kids.

    They also made amazing films together: Cooke, now very much a fan of the Coens’ work, was the assistant editor of their 1991 film Barton Fink and 1994 follow-up The Hudsucker Proxy. And Cooke became the editor of their 1998 The Big Lebowski, 2000’s O Brother, Where Art Thou?, and 2001’s The Man Who Wasn’t There. She edited the latter with the brothers, who used their editing pseudonym, Roderick Jaynes.

    So they became friends for a while. But the relationship evolved. They married in 1993, and had two kids.

    But sometime after that, Joel and Ethan Coen started using Final Cut to edit. And Cooke came to a personal decision involving her kids.

    “As they got a little older, I realized they were going to grow up and I wasn’t going to be able to spend any time with them if I was in the cutting room 10 to 12 hours a day, which is often the case,” says Cooke. “So I decided to slow down and start writing more.”

    She co-directed a documentary with her friend Jennifer Arnold called Where the Girls Are, a comedic short about the history, parties and conflicts of the Dinah Shore Weekend, a giant lesbian pool party in Palm Springs. It won the Outstanding Narrative Short Film at Outfest in 2003.

    She also co-directed the 2008 short “Don’t Mess With Texas” with Carrie Schrader. Cooke co-wrote the film, about two young lesbians who run into trouble at a diner, with Coen.

    “Being married to Ethan and being queer there’s always a little disconnect sometimes,” she laughs. “I wanted to be able to make queer films as well.”

    Coen and Cooke decided in the aughts that they should write a feature screenplay, which they originally called Drive-Away Dykes.

    “We wrote Drive-Away Dykes together many, many years ago as a way for us to spend time together,” says Cooke.

    By then, the couple were no longer in a traditional partnership.

    “We have a very non-traditional marriage and relationship where there’s a bigger unit,” says Cooke. “I have a partner and Ethan has another partner.”

    She adds: “It’s not easy sometimes and it can be very difficult for even our friends and family to understand. You navigate it one day at a time. We’ve been in this kind of dynamic for over 20 years, and we still take it one day at a time.”

    “It’s funny because our whole relationship is like, “What, me worry?” says Coen, quoting Mad Magazine poster boy Alfred E. Newman. “And that’s also the movie.”

    So that’s the backstory of Drive-Away Dolls. Or Drive-Away Dykes. Whichever you prefer.
     

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drive-Away_Dolls

    https://screenrant.com/drive-away-dolls-movie-box-office-opening-weekend/


    Ethan Coen's New Movie Has Disastrous Box Office Opening, Misses Top 5 In First Weekend
    The new Ethan Coen movie Drive-Away Dolls barely makes it into the Top 10 in its domestic opening weekend, landing at No. 8 with a paltry debut.
     
    https://www.slashfilm.com/1526800/ethan-coen-drive-away-dolls-box-office-disappointment/

    Ethan Coen's Drive-Away Dolls Is A Big Box Office Disappointment
     
    DRIVE-AWAY DOLLS - Official Trailer [HD] - Only In Theaters February 23
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oy0RYiQRWUk
    Jun 23, 2023

    Written by Ethan Coen and Tricia Cooke, this comedy caper follows Jamie, an uninhibited free spirit bemoaning yet another breakup with a girlfriend, and her demure friend Marian who desperately needs to loosen up. In search of a fresh start, the two embark on an impromptu road trip to Tallahassee, but things quickly go awry when they cross paths with a group of inept criminals along the way. Directed by Ethan Coen.
     
    DRIVE-AWAY DOLLS - Official Trailer 2 [HD] - Only In Theaters February 23
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vy_7UGICJU
    Feb 6, 2024

    Replies: @Redneck Farmer, @BB753, @SFG, @Muggles, @anonymous, @AnotherDad

    Is that the next thing? Beta males marrying ugly lesbians?

    • Replies: @LG5
    @BB753


    Is that the next thing? Beta males marrying ugly lesbians?
     
    Would that make them a beard and a mustache?

    Instead of a Boston Marriage, how about a San Francisco Marriage? A Cape Cod Peace?
    , @Dutch Boy
    @BB753

    Here in California, they marry non-white women. My brother's first wife had a Mexican mother, who told him she would never marry a Mexican man because they liked to get drunk and beat their wives. Ironically, her white husband was an alcoholic college professor but a non-wife beater. So there is a plentiful non-white female market here for white Betas, considering the competition.

    Replies: @BB753

  21. Look “self sabotage”.

    “O’vhey” are investing on divide and control to make “anti woke” troupe, generally cuck, more and more “anti woke” (but never anti jew).

  22. Are you a person with a three-digit IQ who likes writing down rules and then rewriting them when they don’t work, who likes to tell yourself that you aren’t a slave to your sexual passions like all those underclass rednecks with their “random families”? You are instead an ethical polyamorist.

    For what it’s worth, I briefly shared an apartment with a three-digit IQ guy who prominently displayed The Ethical Polyamorist or some such title on the coffee table. (It was the first time I saw the phrase, and my initial thought was, “Dude, if you want to step out on your girlfriend, then step out on your girlfriend. You don’t need to make a pseudo-philosophical movement out of it!”) As it emerged, this ethical polyamory business extended not only beyond plain old monogamy, but beyond gender, race, and perhaps species. The “Ethical Polyamory” title was just lying there as a slightly subtle announcement that you might share his intimacy tonight but tomorrow he’d be sharing his intimacy with _______ [fill in the blank, just don’t tell me how you did it, please].

    Now that Steve mentions it, “ethical polyamory” may also have served as a class status marker, sort of like “Effective Altruism” before that FTX weirdo nuked the brand: “I’m not some flyover lowbrow doing random stuff to please my amygdala, there is a method here, people!” A method of cobbled-together hippie vagaries in mutual contradiction, perhaps, but a “method” nonetheless.

    Speaking of new turns of phrase, this is the first I’m seeing this “random families” phrase, though I’ve seen plenty enough of the actuality, but I didn’t know there was a book called that, and from 20 years ago no less, back when the FBI still investigated criminals rather than political opponents, quaint as that sounds now. The book comes with an endorsement from Alex “There Are No Children Here” Kotlowitz, a book I actually have read and can tell you is badly observed and badly written, so if that’s the authority on which one reads Random Families, no thanks, but I guess there was (is?) a cultural moment where very white people retail the supposed travails of dusky nobodies for publishing credit.

    And speaking of very white people…

    the polyamorists—who tend to be extremely white, Scott Alexander-level white

    “Scott Alexander-level white”, lol. Oh wait, is “Scott Alexander-level white” a dog whistle for Ashk mischling

    • Replies: @SFG
    @Almost Missouri

    He is pretty pale.

    There is a sense in which he is very typical of the sort of San Francisco/Brooklyn lefty upper middle class that has very few black or Latino people (though a fair number of Asians), i.e. fitting minority stereotypes of white people as responsible, studious, unwilling to get into fights and generally wimpy, etc.

    Scott Alexander's kind of a funny case as his politics are more libertarian anti-SJW from what I can tell. (He doesn't talk about Israel or immigration much and he probably has more fans on the right than left at this point.)

    So he's not white in the 50s 'red-blooded American' sense most of you mean here, but he is white in the 'Stuff White People Like' sense.


    OK, but are the polyamorists Jewish? From my experience it's pretty typical of the woke UMC, i.e. more than 2% but way less than 100. I'd probably estimate 25 or 33%--less than a majority but a significantly overrepresented minority.

    Replies: @puttheforkdown

    , @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Almost Missouri

    https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/highlights-from-the-comments-on-polyamory

    This all makes a lot more sense if you can remember his old internet posts where he discusses being on SSRI meds non-stop since before puberty and he has no sex drive. Scott may have been the only 22 year old male in the history of the universe with no sex drive. His wife probably has a sex urge for about a half hour once a month but of course that isn't any of our business.

    , @Bill Jones
    @Almost Missouri


    back when the FBI still investigated criminals rather than political opponents
     
    Thanks for the laugh. The FBI was investigating political opponents fr5om day one.

    Replies: @res

  23. The next big thing for the left will be a four year long acute case of Trump Derangement Syndrome after Trump becomes president again. Biden’s approval ratings have sunk so low that not even vote fraud in the big Democrat run cities will push him across the finish line.

    Things like the recent survey of political science academics saying Biden is the 14th best president of all time while Trump comes in last aren’t going to help Biden either. Intelligent people know now that the higher education system is woke through and through so a bunch of leftist college professors giving Trump a flunking grade as president is just something they laugh at.

    • Replies: @International Jew
    @Mark G.

    Nah, they can win this one too if they want. They'll let Trump win if they think there's a financial crisis coming (and there is; the national debt is unsustainable). In that case, they'll want the GOP to take the blame.

  24. Years ago I noticed Howard Stern had started doing fewer bits with lesbians (who obviously had quickly become extremely passe) and more with incestuous-y themed stuff (see, e.g., “That’s Just Wrong”). On the belief Stern had the best instincts on the direction of Western Degeneracy of anyone, I assumed incest would be the Next Current Thing. Obviously didn’t happen–I suppose it smacked too much of Appalachian hillbillies for the elites and their attendant pop culture to ever latch onto.

    Anywho, perhaps is correct, and we’ll see something totally different such as a rise in hard-core antisemitism. And maybe in no small part due to our importing of 3rd world hordes with all their backwardness and lack of sophisticated self-delusion. Perhaps the relentless protests against Israel, miraculously persisting in the face of massive establishment pushback, are an indicator. Maybe Aaron Bushnell will be the Current Thing’s patron saint. Who knows. The future might actually be written, but we aren’t on that page yet even if so.

    • Replies: @Bugg
    @Matthew Kelly

    Polyamory invariably is going to be a Muslim disaster of a family gaming the system for benefits and contributing nothing while barely raising their kids. Or ugly urban weirdos in cities. Nobody thinks some aging Jewish Park Slope whore pretending to be cutting edge is a trend to follow spare a few moron overeducated Times readers. She's a whore. It will not be Bill Paxton owning a string of hardware stores raising his prosperous productive family with multiple hot wives. It's bad public policy. Arab countries have been a mess forever in part because excess unmarried young men.

    They thought trans was gonna fly. Alas now Bud Light has Kid Rock, the UFC and Dana White to make amends. Nobody wants to lose money. Well except Hollywood, apparently. Every movie must now feature black girl magic, or Jeffrey Wright or Mashereyechart Ali (nee Hershal Gilmore, quite boring and ordinary and or likely to attract much notice of casting directors, but black AND Muslim, hot damn! ) overacting and saying how evil those white devils are to be considered Oscar-worthy.

    Replies: @Truth, @Anon

  25. anonymous[244] • Disclaimer says:

    Could be something financial, as suppressed economic fragility menacingly bubbles up … like maybe the implementation of the long-standing Wall Street legend of ‘red money’ as a sudden forced replacement of existing US physical cash

    In the world there is maybe 1 to 2 trillion in physical cash that is mostly stored and not used, the majority of this in USA ‘green’ dollars … this includes global ultra-rich, drug dealers, and political actors with millions in US cash

    The idea here, is that a final great ‘financial stimulus’ can be done, by a sudden USA announcement, that the ‘green’ US dollars valid for 150+ years, will shortly be invalid in a few months, replaced by new notes of ‘red money’ … according to Wall Street lore, ‘red money’ dollars are already printed up in US gov warehouses and are ready to go
    https://seekingalpha.com/article/213546-conspiracy-theory-11-red-money

    The trillion or two in cash suddenly flooding in to the real economy, buying many goods and services as global actors are forced to launder their old ‘green money’, would keep things going a little longer … society’s submissives will express fawning loyalty to the new ‘red money’ regime

    A movie was planned about this ‘Red Money’ that began production in 2019-2020, but it was cut short by ‘covid’

  26. What’s next? Many on the right argued that it had to be pedophilia, mostly because that grossed them out the most.

    About 4 1/2 years ago, Audacious Epigone predicted pedophilia indeed, but I thought it’d be polygamy: https://www.unz.com/anepigone/voluntarily-acting-on-involuntary-feelings/#comment-3575522

    [Audacious Epigone] the next outpost of traditional morality to fall in the culture war will be the taboo on pedophilia.

    I think polygamy (esp. polyandry) is more likely. I see it – ever so slowly – being pushed in mass media.

    I also wrote at the time:

    [RSDB] Interesting. Could you give some examples of the kind of thing you were thinking of?

    There was a series of articles in either the NYT or WaPo about “polyamory” couples in the last couple of years, which portrays the latter positively and “empowering” for women in particular.

    I just watched an episode of “Silicon Valley,” in which a character admits to cuckolding another, and the latter happily replies, “That’s okay – we’re poly” and merrily goes on to support funding the former. I’ve seen this insertion of “polyamory,” especially that of women with multiple partners outside marriage here and there recently (though I admit, I don’t watch a whole lot of TV shows).

    My speculation is that “polyamory” (which generally favors female promiscuity if the females in question are married*) is a Trojan Horse (no pun intended) for polygamy/polyandry.

    *It seems to me that when a married couple has an “open marriage,” the typical outcome is that the woman has lots of sexual partners while the man has few (usually one or two at most). At that point, the man becomes either disgruntled or falls in love with another woman and seeks dissolution of the marriage. He then marries the other woman. Meanwhile, the divorced wife may have lots of sexual partners, but has trouble getting married again, especially if she has children from the first marriage.

    World War P, huh?

    • Replies: @Almost Missouri
    @Twinkie


    World War P, huh?
     
    But not the Pedo- P . . . yet.

    The advantage for the Left in Poly-amory/gamy/andry/whatevery is that it allows them to lasso together a bunch of otherwise mutually hostile groups in their Coalition of Fringes.

    Pederasty, Bestiality, and other such abominations do naturally appeal to the Left, and are still on their list for future normalization ("Minor Attracted Person" and "Zoophilia"—the euphemisms are ready and waiting), but neither offers the immediate political advantage of uniting white betaboy polyamorists with "proud African Muslim polygamists" with lesbian serial predators with empowered wahmen with whatever other polymorphous perversity is out there.

    Steve observes that these natural aversions could be a "sticking point", but that is the whole purpose of Coalition-(of the Fringes)-building, or as Obama's handlers called it, Community Organizing: you get the higher-IQ leaders of the various mutually antagonistic groups to overlook their immediate antagonism and to focus their animosity instead on the Real Enemy: heritage America, i.e., you.

    If you want to see an easily visible instance of this in action, watch Friend-Of-Barack Henry Louis Gates's Finding Your Roots TV show. The guests are selected for having some kind of Dem Coalition-of-the-Fringes marker: homosexual, colored, Jewish, children of immigrants, whatever. Then at some point in the show, typically when the guest is emotionally vulnerable from the revelation of an ancestor's hardship, Gates will close in and elicit a pledge of allegiance to the Woke World Order: "I'll never forget how my people were mistreated just as others are being mistreated right now!", "I'll never again question the lived experience of a migrant!", etc., etc. Such often tearful oaths are extracted by the host, recorded by the cameras, and then broadcast to the world with state (i.e. your) subsidy.

    World War P and the Coalition of the Fringes will be making beautiful music together.


    My guess is that some form of polygamy will instead be next, with computer nerds who lack the gene for sexual jealousy demanding “polyamory” and NGOs servicing African refugees insisting that Mr. Nguma and all four Ms. Ngumas and their nineteen children be let in because “love is love,” and if you don’t approve of polygamy you’re racist.
     
    Indeed, it's like a clown world Marvel Justice League Meme All Star Team-Up!

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease

  27. None Of The Above.

    Although polyamory does seem like a recipe for split families and fatherless children, which seems to be what our betters want for us.

    Over in Europe there’s definitely a mutter of distant drums. That could be the next big thing. The place seems to be full of young women politicos who think Something Must Be Done (by Someone Else) about Ukraine. Maybe white feathers will make a comeback.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/28/estonia-youngest-mp-hanah-lahe-interview

    My generation’s heart aches for Ukraine, not because we lived through a war, but because we have the negative imprint of Russian invasion from our heritage. It matters to everyone who is Estonian how things are going in Ukraine,” says Lahe. She is clear: Ukrainian victory is the only path to securing Europe: “There really isn’t any other option.

    OK, US Army recruitment is down (again), but who’s to say that the Emotional Engineers who transformed Occupy Wall Street into Black Lives Matter can’t do it all again?

    The whole world is starting to look like Idiocracy:

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/28/birth-rate-japan-record-low-2023-data-details

    The number of babies born in Japan last year fell for an eighth straight year to a new low, government data has shown, and a top official says it is critical for the country to reverse the trend in the coming half-dozen years. The 758,631 babies born in Japan in 2023 were a 5.1% decline from the previous year, according to the Health and Welfare Ministry on Tuesday. It was the lowest number of births since Japan started compiling the statistics in 1899. The number of marriages fell by 5.9% to 489,281 couples, falling below a half million for the first time in 90 years – one of the key reasons for the declining births.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/28/south-korea-fertility-rate-2023-fall-record-low-incentives

    The average number of children a South Korean woman has during her lifetime fell to 0.72, from 0.78 in 2022 – a decline of nearly 8% – according to preliminary data from Statistics Korea, a government-affiliated body. The rate is well below the average of 2.1 children the country needs to maintain its current population of 51 million. Since 2018, South Korea has been the only member of the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) to have a rate below 1. In addition, South Korean women give birth for the first time at the average age of 33.6 – the highest among OECD members. If the low fertility rate persists, the population of Asia’s fifth-biggest economy is projected to almost halve to 26.8 million by 2100, according to the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington in Seattle.

    North Korea’s fertility per female is 1.91, if this is correct:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_North_Korea

    • Replies: @AndrewR
    @YetAnotherAnon

    Macron openly fantasizes about using NATO troops in Ukraine. A general strike in all NATO countries is necessary.

    Replies: @tyrone

    , @bomag
    @YetAnotherAnon

    Thanks.

    The South Korea stats were on the BBC radio just now. Some remarks were on the adversity between men and women in that country. Looks like they absorbed the message from modern tastemakers a little too eagerly.

    , @Muggles
    @YetAnotherAnon

    Has this Estonian babe politician ever hoisted a rifle?

    Talked to anyone with actual combat experience?

    Tallied the number of heroic female Ukrainian combat soldiers facing death?

    (That tally is probably in the low double digits).

    Like war loving neocons everywhere, bleating for "victory" is best done in warm safe surroundings secure in the knowledge that you and yours are not going to be at risk.

    Ukraine is a crazy event. In 30 years everyone will wonder why this happened. Like the 1850s Crimean War.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Jack D

  28. None Of The Above.

    Although polyamory does seem like a recipe for split families and fatherless children, which seems to be what our betters want for us.

    Over in Europe there’s definitely a mutter of distant drums. That could be the next big thing. The place seems to be full of young women politicos who think Something Must Be Done (by Someone Else) about Ukraine. Maybe white feathers will make a comeback.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/28/estonia-youngest-mp-hanah-lahe-interview

    My generation’s heart aches for Ukraine, not because we lived through a war, but because we have the negative imprint of Russian invasion from our heritage. It matters to everyone who is Estonian how things are going in Ukraine,” says Lahe. She is clear: Ukrainian victory is the only path to securing Europe: “There really isn’t any other option.

    OK, US Army recruitment is down (again), but who’s to say that the Emotional Engineers who transformed Occupy Wall Street into Black Lives Matter can’t do it all again?

    The whole world is starting to look like Idiocracy:

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/28/birth-rate-japan-record-low-2023-data-details

    The number of babies born in Japan last year fell for an eighth straight year to a new low, government data has shown, and a top official says it is critical for the country to reverse the trend in the coming half-dozen years. The 758,631 babies born in Japan in 2023 were a 5.1% decline from the previous year, according to the Health and Welfare Ministry on Tuesday. It was the lowest number of births since Japan started compiling the statistics in 1899. The number of marriages fell by 5.9% to 489,281 couples, falling below a half million for the first time in 90 years – one of the key reasons for the declining births.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/28/south-korea-fertility-rate-2023-fall-record-low-incentives

    The average number of children a South Korean woman has during her lifetime fell to 0.72, from 0.78 in 2022 – a decline of nearly 8% – according to preliminary data from Statistics Korea, a government-affiliated body. The rate is well below the average of 2.1 children the country needs to maintain its current population of 51 million. Since 2018, South Korea has been the only member of the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) to have a rate below 1. In addition, South Korean women give birth for the first time at the average age of 33.6 – the highest among OECD members. If the low fertility rate persists, the population of Asia’s fifth-biggest economy is projected to almost halve to 26.8 million by 2100, according to the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington in Seattle.

    North Korea’s fertility per female is 1.91, if this is correct:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_North_Korea

    • Replies: @Altai4
    @YetAnotherAnon

    Crucially too North Korea also has a more balanced age demography too, they didn't have a big baby boom and now bust. They have a more steady state demography. This too, will be what replaces the current weird demography of the industrial world (And much of the third world too) once the baby boom passes through the system.

    Which is why using immigration to "solve" it is inherently stupid. It will solve itself. People are adapting to the new economy and way of life. The baby boom was just an aberration caused by massively lowered infant death rates, low use of contraception and women still not working as much combined with big post-war booms in opportunity.

    In North Korea they have a command economy under massive US sanctions, there have been no "booms" but also no "busts" in the same way there for many decades. And women were encouraged to have 2 children and no more for many decades too.

    Though unlike North Korea the West will continue for the foreseeable future have too big a financialised economy and big booms and busts which will have demographic impacts, they won't be as intense as that which caused by the baby boom.

    , @Anonymous
    @YetAnotherAnon

    The post 1991 expansion of the EU into central and eastern Europe was a monumental, colossal mistake.
    Many are starting to realise this.

  29. If the NY Times has any success convincing young people that polyamory is a good idea we can expect future articles about a “perplexing” rise in family-annihilation murders.

    Utopians have been trying polyamory pretty much forever. It has never worked out, but that doesn’t stop people from trying it over and over again.

    • Agree: OldJewishGuy, Frau Katze
    • Thanks: kaganovitch
    • Replies: @TWS
    @Bill P

    Poly or celibate for cults of one kind or another. It's something Steve noticed I think.

  30. @MEH 0910
    https://www.moviemaker.com/drive-away-dolls-ethan-coen-tricia-cooke/

    Drive-Away Dolls: How Ethan Coen and Tricia Cooke’s Long Marriage Shaped Their Lesbian Road-Trip Movie
     

    [...]
    I let Ethan and Joel know that I really wanted to work as an editor, and asked if they had any positions available in New York as an apprentice,” says Cooke. “Apparently they already had an apprentice, but they made room for me too, so that was kind.”

    Cooke hit it off with Ethan Coen almost immediately. But they wanted different things.

    “Ethan asked me on a date and we went to see Drugstore Cowboy,” she says. “I told him, ‘I’m a lesbian, I’m not interested.’”

    So they became friends for a while. But the relationship evolved. They married in 1993, and had two kids.

    They also made amazing films together: Cooke, now very much a fan of the Coens’ work, was the assistant editor of their 1991 film Barton Fink and 1994 follow-up The Hudsucker Proxy. And Cooke became the editor of their 1998 The Big Lebowski, 2000’s O Brother, Where Art Thou?, and 2001’s The Man Who Wasn’t There. She edited the latter with the brothers, who used their editing pseudonym, Roderick Jaynes.

    So they became friends for a while. But the relationship evolved. They married in 1993, and had two kids.

    But sometime after that, Joel and Ethan Coen started using Final Cut to edit. And Cooke came to a personal decision involving her kids.

    “As they got a little older, I realized they were going to grow up and I wasn’t going to be able to spend any time with them if I was in the cutting room 10 to 12 hours a day, which is often the case,” says Cooke. “So I decided to slow down and start writing more.”

    She co-directed a documentary with her friend Jennifer Arnold called Where the Girls Are, a comedic short about the history, parties and conflicts of the Dinah Shore Weekend, a giant lesbian pool party in Palm Springs. It won the Outstanding Narrative Short Film at Outfest in 2003.

    She also co-directed the 2008 short “Don’t Mess With Texas” with Carrie Schrader. Cooke co-wrote the film, about two young lesbians who run into trouble at a diner, with Coen.

    “Being married to Ethan and being queer there’s always a little disconnect sometimes,” she laughs. “I wanted to be able to make queer films as well.”

    Coen and Cooke decided in the aughts that they should write a feature screenplay, which they originally called Drive-Away Dykes.

    “We wrote Drive-Away Dykes together many, many years ago as a way for us to spend time together,” says Cooke.

    By then, the couple were no longer in a traditional partnership.

    “We have a very non-traditional marriage and relationship where there’s a bigger unit,” says Cooke. “I have a partner and Ethan has another partner.”

    She adds: “It’s not easy sometimes and it can be very difficult for even our friends and family to understand. You navigate it one day at a time. We’ve been in this kind of dynamic for over 20 years, and we still take it one day at a time.”

    “It’s funny because our whole relationship is like, “What, me worry?” says Coen, quoting Mad Magazine poster boy Alfred E. Newman. “And that’s also the movie.”

    So that’s the backstory of Drive-Away Dolls. Or Drive-Away Dykes. Whichever you prefer.
     

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drive-Away_Dolls

    https://screenrant.com/drive-away-dolls-movie-box-office-opening-weekend/


    Ethan Coen's New Movie Has Disastrous Box Office Opening, Misses Top 5 In First Weekend
    The new Ethan Coen movie Drive-Away Dolls barely makes it into the Top 10 in its domestic opening weekend, landing at No. 8 with a paltry debut.
     
    https://www.slashfilm.com/1526800/ethan-coen-drive-away-dolls-box-office-disappointment/

    Ethan Coen's Drive-Away Dolls Is A Big Box Office Disappointment
     
    DRIVE-AWAY DOLLS - Official Trailer [HD] - Only In Theaters February 23
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oy0RYiQRWUk
    Jun 23, 2023

    Written by Ethan Coen and Tricia Cooke, this comedy caper follows Jamie, an uninhibited free spirit bemoaning yet another breakup with a girlfriend, and her demure friend Marian who desperately needs to loosen up. In search of a fresh start, the two embark on an impromptu road trip to Tallahassee, but things quickly go awry when they cross paths with a group of inept criminals along the way. Directed by Ethan Coen.
     
    DRIVE-AWAY DOLLS - Official Trailer 2 [HD] - Only In Theaters February 23
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vy_7UGICJU
    Feb 6, 2024

    Replies: @Redneck Farmer, @BB753, @SFG, @Muggles, @anonymous, @AnotherDad

    I can’t figure out whether to envy or pity Mr. Coen (is she forcing him to look on while she sleeps around? are they enjoying four-person orgies?), but I’m definitely thinking: don’t try this at home.

    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    @SFG

    I don't know, if your wife is bringing other women home you might be able to come to some accommodation ("only if I can watch"), but it's probably not sustainable - are the Coens still married and how are their kids turning out?

    The only long-term sustainable polyamory is probably the oldest one, the Big Man with multiple wives/significant others. Women would probably rather have Alpha one day a week than Omega 24/7.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8JcZZWPzQQ

    Replies: @James J. O'Meara, @SFG

    , @Barnard
    @SFG

    I don't pity him at all, this is an intentional choice. I do have to wonder who is supposed to be the audience for a movie like this. Is a movie like this made with the understanding that it is just the cost of showing you support the regime? There is no way it could ever make money.

    , @Reg Cæsar
    @SFG


    I can’t figure out whether to envy or pity Mr. Coen (is she forcing him to look on while she sleeps around? are they enjoying four-person orgies?)
     
    To quote Ethan's slightly older childhood neighbor Al Franken in One More Saturday Night, he's a lesbian trapped in the body of a man.
  31. @Almost Missouri

    Are you a person with a three-digit IQ who likes writing down rules and then rewriting them when they don’t work, who likes to tell yourself that you aren’t a slave to your sexual passions like all those underclass rednecks with their “random families”? You are instead an ethical polyamorist.
     
    For what it's worth, I briefly shared an apartment with a three-digit IQ guy who prominently displayed The Ethical Polyamorist or some such title on the coffee table. (It was the first time I saw the phrase, and my initial thought was, "Dude, if you want to step out on your girlfriend, then step out on your girlfriend. You don't need to make a pseudo-philosophical movement out of it!") As it emerged, this ethical polyamory business extended not only beyond plain old monogamy, but beyond gender, race, and perhaps species. The "Ethical Polyamory" title was just lying there as a slightly subtle announcement that you might share his intimacy tonight but tomorrow he'd be sharing his intimacy with _______ [fill in the blank, just don't tell me how you did it, please].

    Now that Steve mentions it, "ethical polyamory" may also have served as a class status marker, sort of like "Effective Altruism" before that FTX weirdo nuked the brand: "I'm not some flyover lowbrow doing random stuff to please my amygdala, there is a method here, people!" A method of cobbled-together hippie vagaries in mutual contradiction, perhaps, but a "method" nonetheless.

    Speaking of new turns of phrase, this is the first I'm seeing this "random families" phrase, though I've seen plenty enough of the actuality, but I didn't know there was a book called that, and from 20 years ago no less, back when the FBI still investigated criminals rather than political opponents, quaint as that sounds now. The book comes with an endorsement from Alex "There Are No Children Here" Kotlowitz, a book I actually have read and can tell you is badly observed and badly written, so if that's the authority on which one reads Random Families, no thanks, but I guess there was (is?) a cultural moment where very white people retail the supposed travails of dusky nobodies for publishing credit.

    And speaking of very white people...


    the polyamorists—who tend to be extremely white, Scott Alexander-level white
     
    "Scott Alexander-level white", lol. Oh wait, is "Scott Alexander-level white" a dog whistle for Ashk mischling...

    Replies: @SFG, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Bill Jones

    He is pretty pale.

    There is a sense in which he is very typical of the sort of San Francisco/Brooklyn lefty upper middle class that has very few black or Latino people (though a fair number of Asians), i.e. fitting minority stereotypes of white people as responsible, studious, unwilling to get into fights and generally wimpy, etc.

    Scott Alexander’s kind of a funny case as his politics are more libertarian anti-SJW from what I can tell. (He doesn’t talk about Israel or immigration much and he probably has more fans on the right than left at this point.)

    So he’s not white in the 50s ‘red-blooded American’ sense most of you mean here, but he is white in the ‘Stuff White People Like’ sense.

    OK, but are the polyamorists Jewish? From my experience it’s pretty typical of the woke UMC, i.e. more than 2% but way less than 100. I’d probably estimate 25 or 33%–less than a majority but a significantly overrepresented minority.

    • Replies: @puttheforkdown
    @SFG

    Scott Alexander is the most Jewish guy. He's an early 20th century Viennese degenerate semite on steroids. An unrepentant materialist atheist, transhumanist glorified government drug dealer (read: psychiatrist) who passionately argues for women being promiscuous and for men to be happy cucks while being asexual himself. After all, the worst case scenario for polyamory is a child being abused, and that happens sometimes in monogamous marriages, so...eh, right?

    Just recently he gave out one of his grants worth tens of thousands of dollars to a trans person arguing for giving children more rights so that they can pursue underage transitioning regardless of the parents wishes.

    The lightness of his skin is irrelevant. Dude is a piece of shit and his articles have never had meaningful positive real world impact - their sole masturbatory value is in showing off his classically Jewish verbal IQ tilt while making the reader feel special for following along. I hope he disappears.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Anonymous

  32. @SFG
    @MEH 0910

    I can't figure out whether to envy or pity Mr. Coen (is she forcing him to look on while she sleeps around? are they enjoying four-person orgies?), but I'm definitely thinking: don't try this at home.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Barnard, @Reg Cæsar

    I don’t know, if your wife is bringing other women home you might be able to come to some accommodation (“only if I can watch”), but it’s probably not sustainable – are the Coens still married and how are their kids turning out?

    The only long-term sustainable polyamory is probably the oldest one, the Big Man with multiple wives/significant others. Women would probably rather have Alpha one day a week than Omega 24/7.

    • Replies: @James J. O'Meara
    @YetAnotherAnon

    Indeed. One of several reasons European women, when kidnapped and finding themselves in Islamic lands, thought it was paradise compared to marriage to some filthy medieval peasant and often refused to be ransomed back.

    , @SFG
    @YetAnotherAnon

    I think he probably isn't enjoying himself too much domestically, but he gets to keep making movies, which is important for those sorts of artsy people. So I guess it's kind of a win.

  33. Steve,

    If you are going to keep writing about trans issues, then one should look up who wrote a book “Troubled” about growing up poor and from a broken family but ending up at Yale and Cambridge.

    https://www.robkhenderson.com/

    https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Troubled/Rob-Henderson/9781982168537

    Dr Henderson is trying to coin the term “luxury belief” to describe who the elite like the idea of trans or polyamory but only for others.

    • Thanks: ic1000
    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
    @Guest007

    "Luxury belief" is a good term. Steve has actually talked about this. E.g. single motherhood is fine if mom is a stable multimillionaire lesbian like Jody Foster. But lower class Shaniqua or Cheyenne need to try and get married and stay married. Charles Murray refers to it as getting the elites to preach what they practice.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Guest007, @Stan Adams, @Jack D

  34. I knew a bunch of these a while back, and posted an entirely too-long comment (before discovering the MORE tag) about a month ago.

    Basically the wokies took it from the geeks, who took it from the hippies, though there was a history before that with the Bloomsbury circle and the Oneida community, etc. They’ll go after you for trying to be a couple looking for a woman or a guy who’ll let his wife/girlfriend date other women but not other men (which I thus assume are fairly popular arrangements.) However, if you open your relationship, the woman will get much more sex, as you have many more men willing to sleep with a married woman than vice versa. (Thus the popularity among feminists.)

    Throuples are actually fairly rare–you either have a person who stays uncommitted (‘solo poly’ or ‘playing the field’ as they used to call it) or multiple unconnected relationships (a ‘Z’ or ‘W’, etc.).

    Lots of LGBTQ people, lots of ugly people, lots of people into BDSM.

    Terrible for childrearing–you might think having more responsible adults around would be good, but these people are rarely responsible.

    • Agree: Bill Jones
    • Replies: @AnotherDad
    @SFG


    Terrible for childrearing–you might think having more responsible adults around would be good, but these people are rarely responsible.
     
    Agreed.

    But I think it's even worse than that. What kids really need/want is some sort of stability--people who love them, who put their needs first, like breakfast in the morning, a packed lunch box and some dinner at 6.

    But people sleeping around flat out means instability, as new passions flare or old ones--perhaps the ones between the parents wane. This is especially true for women sleeping around, as women get these big hormone doses that encourage them to bond with a man they sleep with.

    If you want high quality parental provision, then you really want the traditional--ideally with dad on mom 3 times a week keeping everything humming and the bond strong.

    Replies: @New Dealer

  35. What’s next? Many on the right argued that it had to be pedophilia, mostly because that grossed them out the most. But all the trends point in the opposite direction: For example, the woke are increasingly disgusted by the thought of a 35-year-old man marrying a 25-year-old woman (presumably, a trend driven by all the single 35-year-old women fearing being permanently left on the shelf by single 35-year-old men).

    While various types of sexual behavior has been normalized in recent decades, I’ve noticed an increasingly strong societal taboo emerging around “older” men dating “younger” women.

    For example, if you were in your mid 30s and married a girl in her mid 20s, you’d be viewed as a “sexual predator.”

    In today’s world, homosexuals and transgenders are more “normal” than 35 year-old guys who want a wife in her 20s.

    Who could’ve seen this coming?

    • Replies: @Guest007
    @JohnnyWalker123

    Trophy wives are out of style. That is one of the reasons why college educated whites do not support Trump compared to blue collar whites.

    Replies: @JohnnyWalker123

    , @Wade Hampton
    @JohnnyWalker123


    In today’s world, homosexuals and transgenders are more “normal” than 35 year-old guys who want a wife in her 20s.
     
    Protip: They're not.
  36. In related World War T news, Virginia Lt. Governor Winsome Sears (R) has found herself in a bit of hot water for accidentally referring to senator Danica Rhome (D) as “sir” when recognizing “her” to speak. Sears turns 60 next month and is black.

    I wonder if the percentage of TG individuals in the black community is lower than it is in the general population. I bet it is, as black people, despite their various exploits, tend to be more conservative than white Democrats in certain areas. Someone like RuPaul is more of a drag queen than a transwoman per se. Wikipedia, which has an autistic army protecting its articles, refers to RuPaul with male pronouns. RuPaul is married to a man and is a cousin of bachelor U.S. Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ).

    • Replies: @James J. O'Meara
    @ScarletNumber

    TG is redundant among bleks, as their women are already high-T; e.g. Michael Obama and most female rappers, who tend to look like linebackers.

    , @ChrisZ
    @ScarletNumber

    Your description of the protectors of Wikipedia is terrific, Scarlet. Maybe we should call them the Grand Army of the Autistic?

    Regarding the relation between Rupaul and Sen. Booker, has anyone ever seen them together, in the same place at the same time?

    , @The Anti-Gnostic
    @ScarletNumber

    I think the incidence might be higher. Recall that at one point the top three 400M runners in the world were all African men pretending to be women. Then there's the hulking Brittney Griner, who genuinely comes across as a California surfer dude who posts at iSteve.

    We also could be talking about different phenomena. Anecdotally, androgen uptake issues seem more prevalent among blacks with more RuPauls with definite gay voice and mannerisms versus the typical former athlete/PhD /Navy SEAL white tranny. (Caitlyn Jenner walks, talks and plays golf exactly like the elderly retired decathlete he is.)

    Replies: @Guest007, @ScarletNumber

  37. @YetAnotherAnon
    @SFG

    I don't know, if your wife is bringing other women home you might be able to come to some accommodation ("only if I can watch"), but it's probably not sustainable - are the Coens still married and how are their kids turning out?

    The only long-term sustainable polyamory is probably the oldest one, the Big Man with multiple wives/significant others. Women would probably rather have Alpha one day a week than Omega 24/7.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8JcZZWPzQQ

    Replies: @James J. O'Meara, @SFG

    Indeed. One of several reasons European women, when kidnapped and finding themselves in Islamic lands, thought it was paradise compared to marriage to some filthy medieval peasant and often refused to be ransomed back.

  38. @JohnnyWalker123

    What’s next? Many on the right argued that it had to be pedophilia, mostly because that grossed them out the most. But all the trends point in the opposite direction: For example, the woke are increasingly disgusted by the thought of a 35-year-old man marrying a 25-year-old woman (presumably, a trend driven by all the single 35-year-old women fearing being permanently left on the shelf by single 35-year-old men).

     

    While various types of sexual behavior has been normalized in recent decades, I've noticed an increasingly strong societal taboo emerging around "older" men dating "younger" women.

    For example, if you were in your mid 30s and married a girl in her mid 20s, you'd be viewed as a "sexual predator."

    In today's world, homosexuals and transgenders are more "normal" than 35 year-old guys who want a wife in her 20s.

    Who could've seen this coming?

    Replies: @Guest007, @Wade Hampton

    Trophy wives are out of style. That is one of the reasons why college educated whites do not support Trump compared to blue collar whites.

    • Replies: @JohnnyWalker123
    @Guest007


    Trophy wives are out of style.
     
    Definitely. In today's world, there's an increasing emphasis on finding a wife/girlfriend who's an "equal partner." Equal in age, income, educational credentials, ambitions, etc.

    The "power couple" is very much in style now, especially in the affluent class.

    Getting a beautiful young woman, by leveraging your wealth/success, is now viewed as vulgar.
  39. @ScarletNumber
    In related World War T news, Virginia Lt. Governor Winsome Sears (R) has found herself in a bit of hot water for accidentally referring to senator Danica Rhome (D) as "sir" when recognizing "her" to speak. Sears turns 60 next month and is black.

    I wonder if the percentage of TG individuals in the black community is lower than it is in the general population. I bet it is, as black people, despite their various exploits, tend to be more conservative than white Democrats in certain areas. Someone like RuPaul is more of a drag queen than a transwoman per se. Wikipedia, which has an autistic army protecting its articles, refers to RuPaul with male pronouns. RuPaul is married to a man and is a cousin of bachelor U.S. Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ).

    Replies: @James J. O'Meara, @ChrisZ, @The Anti-Gnostic

    TG is redundant among bleks, as their women are already high-T; e.g. Michael Obama and most female rappers, who tend to look like linebackers.

  40. @YetAnotherAnon
    @SFG

    I don't know, if your wife is bringing other women home you might be able to come to some accommodation ("only if I can watch"), but it's probably not sustainable - are the Coens still married and how are their kids turning out?

    The only long-term sustainable polyamory is probably the oldest one, the Big Man with multiple wives/significant others. Women would probably rather have Alpha one day a week than Omega 24/7.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8JcZZWPzQQ

    Replies: @James J. O'Meara, @SFG

    I think he probably isn’t enjoying himself too much domestically, but he gets to keep making movies, which is important for those sorts of artsy people. So I guess it’s kind of a win.

  41. The next big thing will be animal rights.

    Your cheeseburger will be taxed or legislated out of existence–probably in the name of climate change.

    • Agree: BB753, Poirot, Chrisnonymous
    • Replies: @Chrisnonymous
    @Spud Boy

    Right. The next big thing requires a victim to rally around. Polyamory and pedophilia don't have plausible victims, especially polyamory. But animals can be victims. Combined with save the planet by eating plants ideology, it could be a winner.

  42. @Voltarde
    What's the New Current Thing?

    Thanks to Boomers, a gerontocracy and dementia.

    Replies: @ic1000, @Reg Cæsar, @mc23

    > What’s the New Current Thing? Thanks to Boomers, a gerontocracy and dementia.

    As Trotsky quipped, “You may not be interested in Unfunded Liabilities and Currency Collapse, but they are interested in you.”

    1. Since the U.S. is still in the gradually phase, this won’t be the next New Current Thing.

    2. Given the NYT’s exquisite aversion to offending the amour propre of its paying subscribers, the acticle count will be a lagging rather than leading indicator of this exciting trend.

    • Replies: @slumber_j
    @ic1000

    Having just returned from nine nights in Buenos Aires, I have to say I tend to agree. The Argentine peso is now trades at around 15 percent of where it traded two years ago against the USD, so people walk around with huge wads of 1,000 peso notes (the largest denomination they print) and count out stacks of them to pay for a restaurant dinner. How can we not be headed there in the near future? Beats me.

  43. @Twinkie

    What’s next? Many on the right argued that it had to be pedophilia, mostly because that grossed them out the most.
     
    About 4 1/2 years ago, Audacious Epigone predicted pedophilia indeed, but I thought it'd be polygamy: https://www.unz.com/anepigone/voluntarily-acting-on-involuntary-feelings/#comment-3575522


    [Audacious Epigone] the next outpost of traditional morality to fall in the culture war will be the taboo on pedophilia.
     
    I think polygamy (esp. polyandry) is more likely. I see it – ever so slowly – being pushed in mass media.
     
    I also wrote at the time:


    [RSDB] Interesting. Could you give some examples of the kind of thing you were thinking of?
     
    There was a series of articles in either the NYT or WaPo about “polyamory” couples in the last couple of years, which portrays the latter positively and “empowering” for women in particular.

    I just watched an episode of “Silicon Valley,” in which a character admits to cuckolding another, and the latter happily replies, “That’s okay – we’re poly” and merrily goes on to support funding the former. I’ve seen this insertion of “polyamory,” especially that of women with multiple partners outside marriage here and there recently (though I admit, I don’t watch a whole lot of TV shows).

    My speculation is that “polyamory” (which generally favors female promiscuity if the females in question are married*) is a Trojan Horse (no pun intended) for polygamy/polyandry.

    *It seems to me that when a married couple has an “open marriage,” the typical outcome is that the woman has lots of sexual partners while the man has few (usually one or two at most). At that point, the man becomes either disgruntled or falls in love with another woman and seeks dissolution of the marriage. He then marries the other woman. Meanwhile, the divorced wife may have lots of sexual partners, but has trouble getting married again, especially if she has children from the first marriage.
     

    World War P, huh?

    Replies: @Almost Missouri

    World War P, huh?

    But not the Pedo– P . . . yet.

    The advantage for the Left in Poly-amory/gamy/andry/whatevery is that it allows them to lasso together a bunch of otherwise mutually hostile groups in their Coalition of Fringes.

    Pederasty, Bestiality, and other such abominations do naturally appeal to the Left, and are still on their list for future normalization (“Minor Attracted Person” and “Zoophilia”—the euphemisms are ready and waiting), but neither offers the immediate political advantage of uniting white betaboy polyamorists with “proud African Muslim polygamists” with lesbian serial predators with empowered wahmen with whatever other polymorphous perversity is out there.

    Steve observes that these natural aversions could be a “sticking point”, but that is the whole purpose of Coalition-(of the Fringes)-building, or as Obama’s handlers called it, Community Organizing: you get the higher-IQ leaders of the various mutually antagonistic groups to overlook their immediate antagonism and to focus their animosity instead on the Real Enemy: heritage America, i.e., you.

    If you want to see an easily visible instance of this in action, watch Friend-Of-Barack Henry Louis Gates’s Finding Your Roots TV show. The guests are selected for having some kind of Dem Coalition-of-the-Fringes marker: homosexual, colored, Jewish, children of immigrants, whatever. Then at some point in the show, typically when the guest is emotionally vulnerable from the revelation of an ancestor’s hardship, Gates will close in and elicit a pledge of allegiance to the Woke World Order: “I’ll never forget how my people were mistreated just as others are being mistreated right now!”, “I’ll never again question the lived experience of a migrant!”, etc., etc. Such often tearful oaths are extracted by the host, recorded by the cameras, and then broadcast to the world with state (i.e. your) subsidy.

    World War P and the Coalition of the Fringes will be making beautiful music together.

    My guess is that some form of polygamy will instead be next, with computer nerds who lack the gene for sexual jealousy demanding “polyamory” and NGOs servicing African refugees insisting that Mr. Nguma and all four Ms. Ngumas and their nineteen children be let in because “love is love,” and if you don’t approve of polygamy you’re racist.

    Indeed, it’s like a clown world Marvel Justice League Meme All Star Team-Up!

    • Agree: Twinkie
    • Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Almost Missouri

    Hi, I'm a Leftist. I like living in a house, and I like bricks, but I don't like mortar or cement.

    So my choices are: live in a big loose pile of bricks, or go and squat in somebody else's house.

    Either one is fine, so long as it makes white people miserable

  44. @R.G. Camara
    Pedophilia is only "taboo" when older straight non-alpha men go for younger but legal women.

    Pedophilia is just fine when older women teachers go for their students -- many of them don't see jail, or only have light sentences. And homosexuals are very strongly pushing to lower or remove the ages of consent or reduce penalties for violating it, as they already have in your California. Jean Paul-Sarte and Ruth Bader Ginsburg live again!

    No, the future is that straight men who aren't Chads will be legally restricted from dating any woman not approved by the hens. Likely, it will require a local Coven of Women to vote on such matters.

    Meanwhile, 8 year olds will be raped by gay 50 year olds and it will be celebrated.

    Replies: @Peter Akuleyev, @Rich

    Pedophilia is just fine when older women teachers go for their students

    The left wing anti-pedophilia movement is so strong that a 40 year old woman in New Hampshire has just been indicted for having sex with an 18 year old man. She may receive a 3 year jail sentence.

    https://eu.seacoastonline.com/story/news/local/2024/02/14/teacher-accused-of-sex-with-18-year-old-student-to-plead-guilty/72578966007/

    Even 10 years ago I think that would have seemed prima facie ridiculous to 99% of the population.

    • Replies: @Almost Missouri
    @Peter Akuleyev


    a 40 year old woman in New Hampshire has just been indicted for having sex with an 18 year old man. She may receive a 3 year jail sentence.
     
    She won't.

    In general, men are prosecuted more, imprisoned more, and receive more prison time for these.

    https://www.nj.com/news/2013/04/a_look_at_teacher-student_sex.html

    I actually don't think that is necessarily wrong, but this is one of those cases where two leftist shibboleths (feminism, equalism) collide with each other, resulting in chaotic outcomes. But don't worry, leftist social scientists are still hard at work on ways to have their cake and eat it too.
  45. I think the next goal of the gay lobby will be to persuade prosecutors to stop bringing charges against homosexual men who seduce adolescent males. That’s not really what you mean by ‘the new current thing’. The ‘transgender’ craze is helpful to the gay lobby because it legitimates perversion generally and because social workers, lawyers, and mental health types have been demonstrably willing to strip parents of their authority over their children to advance the interests of deviants.

    • Replies: @Bill P
    @Art Deco


    I think the next goal of the gay lobby will be to persuade prosecutors to stop bringing charges against homosexual men who seduce adolescent males.
     
    They're already practically immune to prosecution for that. Even in the old days nobody wanted to get involved, usually because they assumed the kid was gay.

    How often do you hear about gay men getting arrested for that? And yet if you go to the gay district there are always teenage junkies hanging around the clubs getting picked up by guys cruising around.

    Part of the problem is that it's really hard to find a law-enforcement officer willing or able to play the part of adolescent gay prostitute.

    Replies: @Jack D

    , @Reg Cæsar
    @Art Deco


    ...because social workers, lawyers, and mental health types have been demonstrably willing to strip parents of their authority over their children to advance the interests of deviants.
     
    And themselves.


    The one great principle of the English law is to make business for itself. There is no other principle distinctly, certainly, and consistently maintained through all its narrow turnings. Viewed by this light it becomes a coherent scheme and not the monstrous maze the laity are apt to think it. Let them but once clearly perceive that its grand principle is to make business for itself at their expense and surely they will cease to grumble.”

    --Dickens, Bleak House
  46. Many on the right argued that it had to be pedophilia, mostly because that grossed them out the most.

    There is a consensus on the left, and even mainstream America, that pedophiles are by nature right wing. And indeed, pretty much every case of man on boy pedophilia that gets publicity tends to be conservative male authority figures (priests, evangelicals, Boy Scout leaders, football coaches, politicians). This plays into the left wing narrative that man-on-boy pedophilia is the product of closeting homosexuals and making them ashamed of their true urges. The fact that conservatives unvariably come out in droves to defend creeps like Sandusky, Frank Houston or the Catholic Church just further associates pedophilia with the right-wing in the minds of most Americans.

    The stereotypical lefty pedophile is usually a creepy loser who uses his authority to pick up and “groom” young women. Biden certainly seems like someone who could be in that box. Mike Pence is the kind of weirdo conservative who would surprise no one if it turned out he liked diddling 9 year old boys in the shower.

    • LOL: AndrewR
    • Replies: @LG5
    @Peter Akuleyev

    Apply a prison test to each new movement. How are they tolerated, or not, as inmates. Pedos, read Chomos, are met with instant revulsion in that environment. Other sub-groups might last a little while longer.

    , @Anonymous
    @Peter Akuleyev

    Priests, pedophilic or otherwise, aren't necessarily conservative. This was especially true in the past when the notorious scandals happened. I had a pedophile priest growing up (busted for porn: hopefully he never did anything in person.) His homilies were fairly left-coded, at least by 2000s standards: lots about helping the global poor, anti-consumerism, nonviolence, etc.

    And regarding Sandusky:

    https://www.framingpaterno.com/jerry-sanduskys-request-john-ziegler-summarizes-why-he-became-convinced-alleged-child-abusers-innoce

  47. “with catastrophic consequences for impressionable and moody young girls.”

    Males are 2-4 times more likely to “transition” than females.

    “Many on the right argued that it had to be pedophilia, mostly because that grossed them out the most…. ”

    Huh? Can you provide an example for this claim (I know you won’t actually)? Many people have argued that the next big thing, meaning the nest big victory for homosexual degeneracy, is the decriminalization of adult homosexual men grooming and buggering pubescent aged boys. That isn’t pedophilia. You continue:

    “…But all the trends point in the opposite direction: For example, the woke are increasingly disgusted by the thought of a 35-year-old man marrying a 25-year-old woman”

    Your comparison is flawed. You first reference “the right” when dismissing the incorrect classification of pedophilia, but then point to the “woke” (strangely, not the “left”) when validating their supposed beliefs. So half the population’s (the right) beliefs don’t constitute a trend, but the other half’s (the woke) beliefs do?

    Further, the unspoken reason the woke dislike older men and younger women is because it is 1. perfectly natural, 2. a normal occurrence throughout history, and 3. it facilities people (namely, whites) having more children (whether they actually do is another matter) and that by itself is what the woke is disgusted by.

    This is validated by the plausible assumption that most of those woke people who disapprove of older men and younger women would absolutely celebrate older men grooming younger males for homosexual relations.

    Further still, if polyamory is the next thing, are the woke on board? I mean, if they don’t like an older man marrying a single younger woman, how are they going to feel about an older man marrying 2 or 3 or 4 younger women? Because that is likely the most probable outcome.

    • Replies: @Frau Katze
    @Mike Tre


    “with catastrophic consequences for impressionable and moody young girls.”

    Males are 2-4 times more likely to “transition” than females.
     
    It does seem that among adults, M > F is the most popular.

    But there’s a fad going around young teen girls about being trans.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Reg Cæsar

  48. I think as Steve alludes that Poly won’t work. Gay and Trans people were groups of people who were marginalised outgroups whom mainstream people could be persuaded to treat with sympathy and enforce new moral standards which treat them, like physically disabled or disfigured people as out of bounds of abuse. People who are low status or who have insufficient social connections or insufficiently high status social connections tend to be abused by people who have more high status of these things or who are just generally psychos.

    [MORE]

    See, for instance, how the libertarian spergs who write South Park depicted homeless people in their famous episode. Yes you could read it as a metaphor on how people treat homeless people as less than human but you really get the sense is that that’s how the South Park creators feel too, it’s funny to them. You can very successfully get most people who aren’t psychos to feel bad and organise them to ostracise those who attack those of groups like this who are just living their lives. Of course, trans people are mostly people with various cluster B personality disorders themselves, those who, when given high status make excellent and lifelong bullies. The rest consist of highly eccentric autistic people who are usually their prime victims.

    Poly is inherently low status since it makes clear you’re taking quantity over quality and women are much more selective by nature and make a virtue out of it (Or rather a vice out of not being selective, “slut” is a powerful generic insult women throw at each other.) no matter how much they’re told to be “empowered” and have lots of relationships, they are naturally serial monogamists. That’s just nature. But it’s hard to make poly people into a coherent group oppressed by society or to normalise them as “just like us”. They just seem like people engaged in a hobby and I have yet to see a successful civil rights campaign based on that.

    Plus unlike gays or trans who can be for 99% of women (The tiny number of women inconvenienced by Sailer-type trans dudes in sports or bathrooms really is tiny, though it’s also true that they are disproportionately coming from more influential high income homes) seen to be of no impact on most women’s lives, the idea of promoting what Steve also alludes to as not polygamy but really “open relationships” with the very loose and vague language being issued as well as the drive not to exclude any kind of non-monogamy while we’re at it is really threatening to the most influential, high status women. (The wealthy pretty ones) Who have everything to lose and little to gain from such arrangements. See the only high profile celebrity arrangements being “trouples” of two women and a higher status male. This all sounds like a way not for people to live their “normal” selves that society stopped them from doing but just for people to make passes at high status (Either by money, looks or both) people in relationships. What’s in it for the women in relationships with those men already? And, protip, those are the women who have more social cache than any NYT columnist obliquely complaining that she could have done better than her current man by talking enthusiastically about “poly” (Read: Open) relationships.

    And young 15 year old girls so powerfully influential on social media (I stand by the notion that young girls discovering the biggest multiplayer video game of all time, social media, led the US to it’s insane war with Russia in Ukraine, the sheer madness, hysteria and naive gullibility to believe any anti-Trump narratives of 15 year olds with BPD, the powerusers of social media was staggering and with the Ukraine war, the current situation in Gaza and soon the greater Middle East) have all the time in the world not to be forced to settle (Let alone settle down) and ideal love with young men they deeply love, there is nothing in it for them either except a higher chance of their boyfriends cheating on them. Just look at young people, they are innately always the most fervent against cheating since they haven’t run out of time and options and settled or run out of love for their crushes or girlfriends/boyfriends.

    Similarly all attempts at making Furries anything but the butt of jokes and deep deep stigma have failed. The mainstream media has countless articles on furries that all tend to be in the last 13 years full of sympathetic attempts to “debunk” public perceptions of furries. It has all failed because nobody can accept them due to their weird and sometimes disgusting acts being insufficiently contextualised as the result of any innate characteristics. It’s really hard to justify dressing up as a furry as being anything natural or innate it just looks like something weird and modern. They can’t be contextualised as a coherent “thing” which is just living it’s life. Of course, almost nobody has ever had to encounter or deal with furries, the hate for them comes from them flooding the internet with horrific (Often in overall quality as much as subject matter) digital art of their fetishes and generally forming toxic communities online that bleed into other parts of the internet. Similarly “poly” people are defined not by who they are but what they are choosing to do for a myriad of reasons.

    And more importantly, these kinds of projects only work when there is nothing else to cover, during peacetime. Well, real soon we’re about to see, one way or another, the biggest news event to occur in the 21st century with the attempted Israeli expulsion of the 2 million Palestinians from Gaza after killing over 1% of them in bombing. And then we’ll see if the Israelis and neocons get their war like they did in Ukraine, this time between the US and Syria and or Iran. As we can see in Ukraine, it apparently doesn’t matter if there is a big void in-between 1. Start War and 3. Profit. The likelihood of victory doesn’t matter, this is their last chance to do this, they have nothing to lose. Two birds (Ethnically cleanse, Gaza, provoke war regional war with said action and thus get the US to fight Iran) with one stone is simply too attractive. We’ve already passed the point of no return.

  49. • Thanks: tyrone
  50. What’s the New Current Thing?

    Hm, where have “the current things” arisen in the past?

    That is, what are the test markets for moral panics? (I am of the opinion that Hanlon’s Razor is what powerful and malicious people want the peasants to believe)

    Candidates for moral panic test markets that come to my rather provincial mind are Cambridge and Somerville, Massachusetts and the administration of Boston’s current mayor Michelle Wu.

    I suspect a Cambridge association with the usage of “African American” (now apparently falling out of favor) as Barak Obama’s star was rising there, while he attended Harvard Law, contemporaneously with Jesse Jackson’s promotion of the epithet. https://www.nytimes.com/1989/01/31/us/african-american-favored-by-many-of-america-s-blacks.html

  51. @YetAnotherAnon
    None Of The Above.

    Although polyamory does seem like a recipe for split families and fatherless children, which seems to be what our betters want for us.

    Over in Europe there's definitely a mutter of distant drums. That could be the next big thing. The place seems to be full of young women politicos who think Something Must Be Done (by Someone Else) about Ukraine. Maybe white feathers will make a comeback.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/28/estonia-youngest-mp-hanah-lahe-interview

    My generation’s heart aches for Ukraine, not because we lived through a war, but because we have the negative imprint of Russian invasion from our heritage. It matters to everyone who is Estonian how things are going in Ukraine,” says Lahe. She is clear: Ukrainian victory is the only path to securing Europe: “There really isn’t any other option.
     
    OK, US Army recruitment is down (again), but who's to say that the Emotional Engineers who transformed Occupy Wall Street into Black Lives Matter can't do it all again?



    The whole world is starting to look like Idiocracy:

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/28/birth-rate-japan-record-low-2023-data-details

    The number of babies born in Japan last year fell for an eighth straight year to a new low, government data has shown, and a top official says it is critical for the country to reverse the trend in the coming half-dozen years. The 758,631 babies born in Japan in 2023 were a 5.1% decline from the previous year, according to the Health and Welfare Ministry on Tuesday. It was the lowest number of births since Japan started compiling the statistics in 1899. The number of marriages fell by 5.9% to 489,281 couples, falling below a half million for the first time in 90 years – one of the key reasons for the declining births.
     
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/28/south-korea-fertility-rate-2023-fall-record-low-incentives

    The average number of children a South Korean woman has during her lifetime fell to 0.72, from 0.78 in 2022 – a decline of nearly 8% – according to preliminary data from Statistics Korea, a government-affiliated body. The rate is well below the average of 2.1 children the country needs to maintain its current population of 51 million. Since 2018, South Korea has been the only member of the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) to have a rate below 1. In addition, South Korean women give birth for the first time at the average age of 33.6 – the highest among OECD members. If the low fertility rate persists, the population of Asia’s fifth-biggest economy is projected to almost halve to 26.8 million by 2100, according to the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington in Seattle.
     
    North Korea's fertility per female is 1.91, if this is correct:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_North_Korea

    Replies: @Altai4, @Anonymous

    Crucially too North Korea also has a more balanced age demography too, they didn’t have a big baby boom and now bust. They have a more steady state demography. This too, will be what replaces the current weird demography of the industrial world (And much of the third world too) once the baby boom passes through the system.

    Which is why using immigration to “solve” it is inherently stupid. It will solve itself. People are adapting to the new economy and way of life. The baby boom was just an aberration caused by massively lowered infant death rates, low use of contraception and women still not working as much combined with big post-war booms in opportunity.

    In North Korea they have a command economy under massive US sanctions, there have been no “booms” but also no “busts” in the same way there for many decades. And women were encouraged to have 2 children and no more for many decades too.

    Though unlike North Korea the West will continue for the foreseeable future have too big a financialised economy and big booms and busts which will have demographic impacts, they won’t be as intense as that which caused by the baby boom.

  52. @Nj Transit Commuter
    The “Next Thing” by definition has to be the most abhorrent thing to the current Orthodoxy. Sexual deviancy just doesn’t have the same kick any more.

    Looking at the demographic trend in the US my guess is serious anti-Semitism. Not “Opposition to full on Zionism is anti-Semitism,” anti-Semitism or “casting a Gentile in a Jewish role is hate,” anti-Semitism, but some serious violence.

    Sincerely hope I’m wrong.

    Replies: @Anon, @AndrewR

    Some Jew wrote a book about white rural hate blah blah…you should read the x comments! Talk about an awakening, of course he’s crying out in pain.

    • Replies: @New Dealer
    @Anon

    Wow!!! Now I understand what ratioed means (I hope). The post on X about the White Rural Rage book got 47oo replies and 568 likes. 8.3 ratio.

    I scrolled through first hundred replies, all negative. 4600 to go.

    ISteve, get on this.

    Hint to ethnic minority advocates: Study Dale Carnegie's How to Win Friends and Influence People.

    Replies: @New Dealer, @ScarletNumber

  53. But, so far, the polyamorists—who tend to be extremely white, Scott Alexander-level white—have signally failed to make an alliance with their seeming natural allies, the masses of the Sahel.

    Perhaps the most depressing of all the depressing current things is that there are “masses from the Sahel” here for weirdos to make alliances with.

  54. @Unintended Consequence
    'Ethan Coen’s New Movie Has Disastrous Box Office Opening, Misses Top 5 In First Weekend'

    You know, lesbians and adult nerds just aren't all that interesting.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease

    More like, the Coen brothers belonged to a now-gone past era when people actually liked movies, implicitly understood the basics of film language, and knew how to parse a particular work. Nobody takes the trouble now to parse a Current Year propaganda cut-your-son’s-dick-off clip.

    All dead now. Sort of like opera.

  55. It’s a good way for straight white libs to get in on the whole sexual identity smorgasbord without cutting any body parts off.

  56. Oh, Steve. The 25-year-old men are just as likely to be grossed out that a woman hid age would go with an elderly competitor.

    Like, sure he’s got more money but can he even get it up anymore? She must have Daddy Issues, man.

    • Replies: @Truth
    @Carol


    Like, sure he’s got more money but can he even get it up anymore?
     
    At 40?
  57. @SFG
    I knew a bunch of these a while back, and posted an entirely too-long comment (before discovering the MORE tag) about a month ago.

    Basically the wokies took it from the geeks, who took it from the hippies, though there was a history before that with the Bloomsbury circle and the Oneida community, etc. They'll go after you for trying to be a couple looking for a woman or a guy who'll let his wife/girlfriend date other women but not other men (which I thus assume are fairly popular arrangements.) However, if you open your relationship, the woman will get much more sex, as you have many more men willing to sleep with a married woman than vice versa. (Thus the popularity among feminists.)

    Throuples are actually fairly rare--you either have a person who stays uncommitted ('solo poly' or 'playing the field' as they used to call it) or multiple unconnected relationships (a 'Z' or 'W', etc.).

    Lots of LGBTQ people, lots of ugly people, lots of people into BDSM.

    Terrible for childrearing--you might think having more responsible adults around would be good, but these people are rarely responsible.

    Replies: @AnotherDad

    Terrible for childrearing–you might think having more responsible adults around would be good, but these people are rarely responsible.

    Agreed.

    But I think it’s even worse than that. What kids really need/want is some sort of stability–people who love them, who put their needs first, like breakfast in the morning, a packed lunch box and some dinner at 6.

    But people sleeping around flat out means instability, as new passions flare or old ones–perhaps the ones between the parents wane. This is especially true for women sleeping around, as women get these big hormone doses that encourage them to bond with a man they sleep with.

    If you want high quality parental provision, then you really want the traditional–ideally with dad on mom 3 times a week keeping everything humming and the bond strong.

    • Replies: @New Dealer
    @AnotherDad

    Yes, polyamory would be terrible for children.

    There is another huge drawback. In a normal household of man, woman, couple of kids, you can never find a damned thing. Somebody didn't put the can opener back, you find it a few days later under the sink. Or one of the grownups decides to reorganize the kitchen cupboards again. You find your razor in the toilet tank and your shaving cream in the backyard. Your best sweater is missing for some reason. Your socket set is no longer with your tools, but somehow ended up with the pots and pans.

    All that would be exponentially worse in a polyamorous household.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Muggles, @DenverGregg, @hhsiii, @Colin Wright


  58. I read that some schools in Japan were prohibiting girls from wearing pigtails or ponytails because boys were being driven insane by the sight of the nape of the neck. And then, curious about this, I did some research and read that nape-o-philia, while more pronounced in Japan, was making inroads in the US. So, I will nominate nape-o-philia as the next big – – okay, small-sized big – – thing.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @SafeNow

    She's old enough to have tats, so that isn't statutory nape.

  59. @BB753
    @MEH 0910

    Is that the next thing? Beta males marrying ugly lesbians?

    Replies: @LG5, @Dutch Boy

    Is that the next thing? Beta males marrying ugly lesbians?

    Would that make them a beard and a mustache?

    Instead of a Boston Marriage, how about a San Francisco Marriage? A Cape Cod Peace?

  60. @ScarletNumber
    In related World War T news, Virginia Lt. Governor Winsome Sears (R) has found herself in a bit of hot water for accidentally referring to senator Danica Rhome (D) as "sir" when recognizing "her" to speak. Sears turns 60 next month and is black.

    I wonder if the percentage of TG individuals in the black community is lower than it is in the general population. I bet it is, as black people, despite their various exploits, tend to be more conservative than white Democrats in certain areas. Someone like RuPaul is more of a drag queen than a transwoman per se. Wikipedia, which has an autistic army protecting its articles, refers to RuPaul with male pronouns. RuPaul is married to a man and is a cousin of bachelor U.S. Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ).

    Replies: @James J. O'Meara, @ChrisZ, @The Anti-Gnostic

    Your description of the protectors of Wikipedia is terrific, Scarlet. Maybe we should call them the Grand Army of the Autistic?

    Regarding the relation between Rupaul and Sen. Booker, has anyone ever seen them together, in the same place at the same time?

    • Thanks: ScarletNumber
  61. Rick Santorum brought up polygamy (and bestiality and incest) as the next legal “right” over a decade ago and was ridiculed.

  62. @Peter Akuleyev

    Many on the right argued that it had to be pedophilia, mostly because that grossed them out the most.
     
    There is a consensus on the left, and even mainstream America, that pedophiles are by nature right wing. And indeed, pretty much every case of man on boy pedophilia that gets publicity tends to be conservative male authority figures (priests, evangelicals, Boy Scout leaders, football coaches, politicians). This plays into the left wing narrative that man-on-boy pedophilia is the product of closeting homosexuals and making them ashamed of their true urges. The fact that conservatives unvariably come out in droves to defend creeps like Sandusky, Frank Houston or the Catholic Church just further associates pedophilia with the right-wing in the minds of most Americans.

    The stereotypical lefty pedophile is usually a creepy loser who uses his authority to pick up and "groom" young women. Biden certainly seems like someone who could be in that box. Mike Pence is the kind of weirdo conservative who would surprise no one if it turned out he liked diddling 9 year old boys in the shower.

    Replies: @LG5, @Anonymous

    Apply a prison test to each new movement. How are they tolerated, or not, as inmates. Pedos, read Chomos, are met with instant revulsion in that environment. Other sub-groups might last a little while longer.

  63. @ScarletNumber
    In related World War T news, Virginia Lt. Governor Winsome Sears (R) has found herself in a bit of hot water for accidentally referring to senator Danica Rhome (D) as "sir" when recognizing "her" to speak. Sears turns 60 next month and is black.

    I wonder if the percentage of TG individuals in the black community is lower than it is in the general population. I bet it is, as black people, despite their various exploits, tend to be more conservative than white Democrats in certain areas. Someone like RuPaul is more of a drag queen than a transwoman per se. Wikipedia, which has an autistic army protecting its articles, refers to RuPaul with male pronouns. RuPaul is married to a man and is a cousin of bachelor U.S. Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ).

    Replies: @James J. O'Meara, @ChrisZ, @The Anti-Gnostic

    I think the incidence might be higher. Recall that at one point the top three 400M runners in the world were all African men pretending to be women. Then there’s the hulking Brittney Griner, who genuinely comes across as a California surfer dude who posts at iSteve.

    We also could be talking about different phenomena. Anecdotally, androgen uptake issues seem more prevalent among blacks with more RuPauls with definite gay voice and mannerisms versus the typical former athlete/PhD /Navy SEAL white tranny. (Caitlyn Jenner walks, talks and plays golf exactly like the elderly retired decathlete he is.)

    • Replies: @Guest007
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    One should probably provide a cite on the top three 400 meter runners and when.

    Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic

    , @ScarletNumber
    @The Anti-Gnostic


    We also could be talking about different phenomena
     
    We are. The examples you cite are natural-born women who happen to have an abnormally large amount of testosterone. As stated by Peter D. Bredon, black women in their natural state already have a lot of masculine qualities so a formal transition would be superfluous. I wouldn't want to take on Brittney Griner in a fight, but that doesn't mean she was born with a penis.

    Shaunae Miller, a Jamaican who is the current Olympic 400m champion*, displays a lack of traditional femininity but is married to an Estonian man and she had his son in April, so I would say she qualifies as a natural born woman.

    Anyway, I stand by my original point that formal transitioning happens less among blacks than it does in any other race. I don't know if statistics are kept on the subject, but I would also think that formal transitioning happens less in Africa than it does in any other continent.

    * In another iSteve topic, the current record holder in this event is an East German who set the record in 1985.
  64. @Voltarde
    What's the New Current Thing?

    Thanks to Boomers, a gerontocracy and dementia.

    Replies: @ic1000, @Reg Cæsar, @mc23

    What’s the New Current Thing?

    Thanks to Boomers…

    I was going to say fools and morons pushing tenuous “generation” labels, but that’s been a Thing for a while now, hasn’t it?

    • Replies: @duncsbaby
    @Reg Cæsar

    The guy who said, "Don't trust anyone over 30," will be 84 on 4-4-24. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Weinberg

  65. @SafeNow
    https://www.attractiondiary.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/pexels-ibraim-leonardo-5032808.jpg

    I read that some schools in Japan were prohibiting girls from wearing pigtails or ponytails because boys were being driven insane by the sight of the nape of the neck. And then, curious about this, I did some research and read that nape-o-philia, while more pronounced in Japan, was making inroads in the US. So, I will nominate nape-o-philia as the next big - - okay, small-sized big - - thing.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    She’s old enough to have tats, so that isn’t statutory nape.

    • LOL: SafeNow, Frau Katze
  66. For 2024, I suspect that there will be more discussions and product announcements in both nootropics/neuroenhancements (psychedelics) and weight management (GLP-1 receptor agonists, etc). Long live the global industrial complex.

  67. @Peter Akuleyev
    @R.G. Camara

    Pedophilia is just fine when older women teachers go for their students

    The left wing anti-pedophilia movement is so strong that a 40 year old woman in New Hampshire has just been indicted for having sex with an 18 year old man. She may receive a 3 year jail sentence.

    https://eu.seacoastonline.com/story/news/local/2024/02/14/teacher-accused-of-sex-with-18-year-old-student-to-plead-guilty/72578966007/

    Even 10 years ago I think that would have seemed prima facie ridiculous to 99% of the population.

    Replies: @Almost Missouri

    a 40 year old woman in New Hampshire has just been indicted for having sex with an 18 year old man. She may receive a 3 year jail sentence.

    She won’t.

    In general, men are prosecuted more, imprisoned more, and receive more prison time for these.

    https://www.nj.com/news/2013/04/a_look_at_teacher-student_sex.html

    I actually don’t think that is necessarily wrong, but this is one of those cases where two leftist shibboleths (feminism, equalism) collide with each other, resulting in chaotic outcomes. But don’t worry, leftist social scientists are still hard at work on ways to have their cake and eat it too.

  68. If 35 yo women had sense, they’d toss hypergamy aside and start pursuing 18 yo boys/men while they (the cougars) can still conceive. Let the old dudes have their trophy wives.

    • Agree: Adam Smith
  69. A lot of this novelty-hunting in sexual relations and behavior springs from the no-fault divorce revolution of about a half century ago. Before this revolution a word association test for “marriage” would produce words like “duty” and “responsibility.” After the revolution, the same association test would produce “rights,” or “privileges” or “benefits.”

    Before no-fault divorce, marriage was basically a state in which the government stood ready to coerce both spouses to fulfill duties to one another, like support, sexual relations and help in child-raising. After no-fault, the government is mostly coercing the rest of society, employers and taxpayers, to confer benefits and subsidies and privileges on whatever parties were supposed to be “married.”

    • Agree: Poirot, ben tillman
    • Replies: @Prester John
    @Henry Canaday

    "After the revolution, the same association test would produce 'rights,' or 'privileges' or 'benefits.' ”

    Substitute the word "and" for "or" and you have the entire "Progressive" agenda in a nutshell.

    , @Ralph L
    @Henry Canaday


    the government is mostly coercing the rest of society, employers and taxpayers, to confer benefits and subsidies and privileges on whatever parties were supposed to be “married."
     
    No, 90% went to unmarried or divorced mothers and some non-mothers, the bedrocks of the Party.
    , @Thea
    @Henry Canaday

    I agree but cannot select that,

    World War T wasn’t ever the next new thing. Transsexuals melted into the general sexual decadence of social decline.

    After sexual morality no longer derived from marriage and the role of parenthood , it’s been a free-for-all.

    If you can get divorced and remarried, then why can’t you have sex before marriage? If you can have sex before marriage, why can’t it be with either a male or a female as you choose? If you don’t want to be a parent, why can’t you do what you want with your baby? If you don’t want to be a man, why can’t you be a woman?
    If you weren’t born in the USA but want to live in America , why can’t you?

    Without marriage and strong sexual taboos, no civilization can prosper.

    The is no “next thing” when you are just rolling g around in the sewer already.

    , @New Dealer
    @Henry Canaday

    The Chicago economists, don't recall the cite, argued that no-fault divorce worsens the bargaining position of the wife. The party with more resources (can try harder, can wait longer, can more afford to walk away) has a bargaining advantage over the party with fewer resources . On average, wives are at a bargaining disadvantage in a separation, because their time spent with children in the household makes them less trained and less senior in the labor market compared to the husband, and wives are more emotionally attached to the children.

    In a fault regime, both parties have to consent to dissolution, which equalizes their bargaining power.

    And, according to my forgotten source, data support the prediction: when a non-fault regime is imposed women receive worse divorce settlements.

    And, if I remember correctly, the source shows that women started to delay marriage and invest more in college tightly in response to the advent of no-fault divorce regimes (measurable because no-fault started in different states in different years).

    If I have it wrong, correct me kindly.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon

  70. @Nj Transit Commuter
    The “Next Thing” by definition has to be the most abhorrent thing to the current Orthodoxy. Sexual deviancy just doesn’t have the same kick any more.

    Looking at the demographic trend in the US my guess is serious anti-Semitism. Not “Opposition to full on Zionism is anti-Semitism,” anti-Semitism or “casting a Gentile in a Jewish role is hate,” anti-Semitism, but some serious violence.

    Sincerely hope I’m wrong.

    Replies: @Anon, @AndrewR

    Why do you hope you’re wrong?

  71. @YetAnotherAnon
    None Of The Above.

    Although polyamory does seem like a recipe for split families and fatherless children, which seems to be what our betters want for us.

    Over in Europe there's definitely a mutter of distant drums. That could be the next big thing. The place seems to be full of young women politicos who think Something Must Be Done (by Someone Else) about Ukraine. Maybe white feathers will make a comeback.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/28/estonia-youngest-mp-hanah-lahe-interview

    My generation’s heart aches for Ukraine, not because we lived through a war, but because we have the negative imprint of Russian invasion from our heritage. It matters to everyone who is Estonian how things are going in Ukraine,” says Lahe. She is clear: Ukrainian victory is the only path to securing Europe: “There really isn’t any other option.
     
    OK, US Army recruitment is down (again), but who's to say that the Emotional Engineers who transformed Occupy Wall Street into Black Lives Matter can't do it all again?



    The whole world is starting to look like Idiocracy:

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/28/birth-rate-japan-record-low-2023-data-details

    The number of babies born in Japan last year fell for an eighth straight year to a new low, government data has shown, and a top official says it is critical for the country to reverse the trend in the coming half-dozen years. The 758,631 babies born in Japan in 2023 were a 5.1% decline from the previous year, according to the Health and Welfare Ministry on Tuesday. It was the lowest number of births since Japan started compiling the statistics in 1899. The number of marriages fell by 5.9% to 489,281 couples, falling below a half million for the first time in 90 years – one of the key reasons for the declining births.
     
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/28/south-korea-fertility-rate-2023-fall-record-low-incentives

    The average number of children a South Korean woman has during her lifetime fell to 0.72, from 0.78 in 2022 – a decline of nearly 8% – according to preliminary data from Statistics Korea, a government-affiliated body. The rate is well below the average of 2.1 children the country needs to maintain its current population of 51 million. Since 2018, South Korea has been the only member of the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) to have a rate below 1. In addition, South Korean women give birth for the first time at the average age of 33.6 – the highest among OECD members. If the low fertility rate persists, the population of Asia’s fifth-biggest economy is projected to almost halve to 26.8 million by 2100, according to the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington in Seattle.
     
    North Korea's fertility per female is 1.91, if this is correct:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_North_Korea

    Replies: @AndrewR, @bomag, @Muggles

    Macron openly fantasizes about using NATO troops in Ukraine. A general strike in all NATO countries is necessary.

    • Replies: @tyrone
    @AndrewR


    Macron openly fantasizes about using NATO troops in Ukraine
     
    Right, FAFO, of course one has to wonder who is operating the patriot missiles and HMARS right now.
  72. @Guest007
    Steve,

    If you are going to keep writing about trans issues, then one should look up who wrote a book "Troubled" about growing up poor and from a broken family but ending up at Yale and Cambridge.


    https://www.robkhenderson.com/

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J193004ScAU

    https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Troubled/Rob-Henderson/9781982168537

    Dr Henderson is trying to coin the term "luxury belief" to describe who the elite like the idea of trans or polyamory but only for others.

    Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic

    “Luxury belief” is a good term. Steve has actually talked about this. E.g. single motherhood is fine if mom is a stable multimillionaire lesbian like Jody Foster. But lower class Shaniqua or Cheyenne need to try and get married and stay married. Charles Murray refers to it as getting the elites to preach what they practice.

    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    "getting the elites to preach what they practice"

    Or "talk 60s and live 50s".

    Take Ursula von der Leyen, the unelected plagiarist leader of the EU. While campaigning for all things fake and gay, she has seven children.

    , @Guest007
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    As has been pointed out many times, the men in the same economic position as blue collar and pink collar black women act more like another child than as a marriable male who has any prospects for the future. Marriage for those poor black women is more risk with much less reward. Then the question is whether they give up having children or be a single mother.

    , @Stan Adams
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    Back in 1992 Dan Quayle made a speech criticizing Hollywood for producing movies and TV shows that portrayed single motherhood in a positive light. In particular he criticized the sitcom Murphy Brown.

    This became what Biden would call "a big f**king deal" - it was discussed endlessly in the media. Newspaper columnists spilled oceans of ink in their zeal to denounce Quayle as a clueless moron and to venerate Murphy Brown as a veritable goddess of fertility.

    When the show returned from summer hiatus, the presidential campaign was in full swing. The season premiere was an hourlong Very Special Episode devoted to ripping Dan Quayle a new one. The critics heaped praise on it.

    But then a few days later Ross Perot rejoined the race, and nobody gave a crap about Quayle anymore because they knew that Bush was finished.

    And then about twenty years later Candice Bergen admitted that Quayle had been right.

    Replies: @res

    , @Jack D
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    These are two contradictory things - the people who could BEST afford single parenthood are the ones who least engage in it and the ones who can least afford it do it the most. The rich used to preach "middle class values" to the poor but that's so judgmental. Can't be judgmental anymore.

    Musk is an exception. He has babies all over the place like some ghetto baby daddy. 11 IIRC. He has custody of one of them and brings him everywhere, accompanied by the kid's nanny and bodyguard. Musk believes that smart, rich people having a lot of children is eugenic. Nazi!

    https://twitter.com/Iam_StephenMusk/status/1761553781135725015

    I believe this kid's name is X Æ A-12 Musk.

    Replies: @Dutch Boy, @deep anonymous, @Frau Katze

  73. Anonymous[127] • Disclaimer says:

    After the tumult of Paris 1968, from which date, maybe coincidentally or not, governments across the west more or less refused to prosecute the purveyors of hard core pornography – that is the photographic depiction of actual sexual intercourse, (the left of that time counter this amongst their victories, ironically, given how the woke left of today hates porn), Daniel Bendit-Cohn, (Dirty Bandit-Pervert, more like), waxed lyrically about the joys of pedophilia. This made pedophilia trendy amongst hard left leaders of the time, who thought cooties were to be made by parroting the lines of a lefty demi god like Cohn-Bendit.
    The Labour Party MP, Harriett Harman, who was briefly and totally forgettable Labour Party leader openly advocated for pedophiles in the 1970s UK.

  74. @YetAnotherAnon
    None Of The Above.

    Although polyamory does seem like a recipe for split families and fatherless children, which seems to be what our betters want for us.

    Over in Europe there's definitely a mutter of distant drums. That could be the next big thing. The place seems to be full of young women politicos who think Something Must Be Done (by Someone Else) about Ukraine. Maybe white feathers will make a comeback.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/28/estonia-youngest-mp-hanah-lahe-interview

    My generation’s heart aches for Ukraine, not because we lived through a war, but because we have the negative imprint of Russian invasion from our heritage. It matters to everyone who is Estonian how things are going in Ukraine,” says Lahe. She is clear: Ukrainian victory is the only path to securing Europe: “There really isn’t any other option.
     
    OK, US Army recruitment is down (again), but who's to say that the Emotional Engineers who transformed Occupy Wall Street into Black Lives Matter can't do it all again?



    The whole world is starting to look like Idiocracy:

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/28/birth-rate-japan-record-low-2023-data-details

    The number of babies born in Japan last year fell for an eighth straight year to a new low, government data has shown, and a top official says it is critical for the country to reverse the trend in the coming half-dozen years. The 758,631 babies born in Japan in 2023 were a 5.1% decline from the previous year, according to the Health and Welfare Ministry on Tuesday. It was the lowest number of births since Japan started compiling the statistics in 1899. The number of marriages fell by 5.9% to 489,281 couples, falling below a half million for the first time in 90 years – one of the key reasons for the declining births.
     
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/28/south-korea-fertility-rate-2023-fall-record-low-incentives

    The average number of children a South Korean woman has during her lifetime fell to 0.72, from 0.78 in 2022 – a decline of nearly 8% – according to preliminary data from Statistics Korea, a government-affiliated body. The rate is well below the average of 2.1 children the country needs to maintain its current population of 51 million. Since 2018, South Korea has been the only member of the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) to have a rate below 1. In addition, South Korean women give birth for the first time at the average age of 33.6 – the highest among OECD members. If the low fertility rate persists, the population of Asia’s fifth-biggest economy is projected to almost halve to 26.8 million by 2100, according to the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington in Seattle.
     
    North Korea's fertility per female is 1.91, if this is correct:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_North_Korea

    Replies: @AndrewR, @bomag, @Muggles

    Thanks.

    The South Korea stats were on the BBC radio just now. Some remarks were on the adversity between men and women in that country. Looks like they absorbed the message from modern tastemakers a little too eagerly.

  75. @YetAnotherAnon
    None Of The Above.

    Although polyamory does seem like a recipe for split families and fatherless children, which seems to be what our betters want for us.

    Over in Europe there's definitely a mutter of distant drums. That could be the next big thing. The place seems to be full of young women politicos who think Something Must Be Done (by Someone Else) about Ukraine. Maybe white feathers will make a comeback.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/28/estonia-youngest-mp-hanah-lahe-interview

    My generation’s heart aches for Ukraine, not because we lived through a war, but because we have the negative imprint of Russian invasion from our heritage. It matters to everyone who is Estonian how things are going in Ukraine,” says Lahe. She is clear: Ukrainian victory is the only path to securing Europe: “There really isn’t any other option.
     
    OK, US Army recruitment is down (again), but who's to say that the Emotional Engineers who transformed Occupy Wall Street into Black Lives Matter can't do it all again?



    The whole world is starting to look like Idiocracy:

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/28/birth-rate-japan-record-low-2023-data-details

    The number of babies born in Japan last year fell for an eighth straight year to a new low, government data has shown, and a top official says it is critical for the country to reverse the trend in the coming half-dozen years. The 758,631 babies born in Japan in 2023 were a 5.1% decline from the previous year, according to the Health and Welfare Ministry on Tuesday. It was the lowest number of births since Japan started compiling the statistics in 1899. The number of marriages fell by 5.9% to 489,281 couples, falling below a half million for the first time in 90 years – one of the key reasons for the declining births.
     
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/28/south-korea-fertility-rate-2023-fall-record-low-incentives

    The average number of children a South Korean woman has during her lifetime fell to 0.72, from 0.78 in 2022 – a decline of nearly 8% – according to preliminary data from Statistics Korea, a government-affiliated body. The rate is well below the average of 2.1 children the country needs to maintain its current population of 51 million. Since 2018, South Korea has been the only member of the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) to have a rate below 1. In addition, South Korean women give birth for the first time at the average age of 33.6 – the highest among OECD members. If the low fertility rate persists, the population of Asia’s fifth-biggest economy is projected to almost halve to 26.8 million by 2100, according to the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington in Seattle.
     
    North Korea's fertility per female is 1.91, if this is correct:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_North_Korea

    Replies: @Altai4, @Anonymous

    The post 1991 expansion of the EU into central and eastern Europe was a monumental, colossal mistake.
    Many are starting to realise this.

  76. …now have a transgender identity, which makes them sacred and entitled to abuse anybody lower on the pyramid of identity-politics privilege.

    EXCLUSIVE: Female Inmate Forced to Bunk with Masturbating Transgender Prisoner Who Raped Daughter, Messages Claim

    Where is the Eighth Amendment when you need it? Oh, yeah… that’s what put this guy in a cell with her. Anarcho-tyranny in practice.

    “Some of the female prisoner’s graphic descriptions of Campbell’s masturbation habits indicate that Campbell may have undergone a vaginoplasty, wherein surgeons remove the penis, testicles, and scrotum…”

    Taycheedah = Detach? Yeah!

    • Replies: @BB753
    @Reg Cæsar

    If the guy has a fake vagina, his masturbations must be faked as well as his orgasms... I understand he's a freak but what's the difference with bunking with a female prisoner who masturbates?

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

  77. • Replies: @tyrone
    @J.Ross

    Thank you!...........by the way, that's the "talented tenth" being represented there.......being ruled by these monsters will be hell on earth.

  78. @Henry Canaday
    A lot of this novelty-hunting in sexual relations and behavior springs from the no-fault divorce revolution of about a half century ago. Before this revolution a word association test for “marriage” would produce words like “duty” and “responsibility.” After the revolution, the same association test would produce “rights,” or “privileges” or “benefits.”

    Before no-fault divorce, marriage was basically a state in which the government stood ready to coerce both spouses to fulfill duties to one another, like support, sexual relations and help in child-raising. After no-fault, the government is mostly coercing the rest of society, employers and taxpayers, to confer benefits and subsidies and privileges on whatever parties were supposed to be “married.”

    Replies: @Prester John, @Ralph L, @Thea, @New Dealer

    “After the revolution, the same association test would produce ‘rights,’ or ‘privileges’ or ‘benefits.’ ”

    Substitute the word “and” for “or” and you have the entire “Progressive” agenda in a nutshell.

  79. H. L. Hunt (b. 1889) American oil tycoon and bigamist.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._L._Hunt

    And then there is mathematician https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ari_Nagel

  80. @Henry Canaday
    A lot of this novelty-hunting in sexual relations and behavior springs from the no-fault divorce revolution of about a half century ago. Before this revolution a word association test for “marriage” would produce words like “duty” and “responsibility.” After the revolution, the same association test would produce “rights,” or “privileges” or “benefits.”

    Before no-fault divorce, marriage was basically a state in which the government stood ready to coerce both spouses to fulfill duties to one another, like support, sexual relations and help in child-raising. After no-fault, the government is mostly coercing the rest of society, employers and taxpayers, to confer benefits and subsidies and privileges on whatever parties were supposed to be “married.”

    Replies: @Prester John, @Ralph L, @Thea, @New Dealer

    the government is mostly coercing the rest of society, employers and taxpayers, to confer benefits and subsidies and privileges on whatever parties were supposed to be “married.”

    No, 90% went to unmarried or divorced mothers and some non-mothers, the bedrocks of the Party.

  81. @Reg Cæsar

    ...now have a transgender identity, which makes them sacred and entitled to abuse anybody lower on the pyramid of identity-politics privilege.
     
    EXCLUSIVE: Female Inmate Forced to Bunk with Masturbating Transgender Prisoner Who Raped Daughter, Messages Claim

    Where is the Eighth Amendment when you need it? Oh, yeah... that's what put this guy in a cell with her. Anarcho-tyranny in practice.

    "Some of the female prisoner’s graphic descriptions of Campbell’s masturbation habits indicate that Campbell may have undergone a vaginoplasty, wherein surgeons remove the penis, testicles, and scrotum..."


    Taycheedah = Detach? Yeah!

    Replies: @BB753

    If the guy has a fake vagina, his masturbations must be faked as well as his orgasms… I understand he’s a freak but what’s the difference with bunking with a female prisoner who masturbates?

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @BB753

    Level of aggression?

    I'm with Selective Service and Dr David Reuben on this one: there is no such thing as a "sex change". Ever. Stuck in the Seventies!

  82. @anonymous
    In Los Angeles, it’s idiot negroes leading high speed car chases… every… fucking… day.

    These happened quite recently…

    https://www.youtube.com/live/1cVjjmLFmyo?si=Acm3qUkCMTJxuGJi

    https://youtu.be/CXUgZ6rvzB4

    In the vid below, the idiot negro survived, but six others did not. She had multiple reckless driving charges prior to this doozy.

    Question: Are there any stats available delineating the race of the leaders of So. Cal car chases and resulting deaths? I'm doubting it, since the stats would very likely lean absurdly towards negro offenders, enough so that would appear to be "a new thing."

    https://youtu.be/2YyXAD6p4tc

    Replies: @Pop Warner, @TWS, @Servenet

    I catch a lot of these chases live because they’re shared on /pol/ a lot, especially the LA ones because the police procedure is to lay back and local news choppers always need something to do.

    A lot of the suspects are Hispanic, which isn’t a surprise considering how Hispanic LA County is. There are some black subjects, and the occasional white suspect (though they’re probably Hispanic too).

  83. @The Anti-Gnostic
    @Guest007

    "Luxury belief" is a good term. Steve has actually talked about this. E.g. single motherhood is fine if mom is a stable multimillionaire lesbian like Jody Foster. But lower class Shaniqua or Cheyenne need to try and get married and stay married. Charles Murray refers to it as getting the elites to preach what they practice.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Guest007, @Stan Adams, @Jack D

    “getting the elites to preach what they practice”

    Or “talk 60s and live 50s”.

    Take Ursula von der Leyen, the unelected plagiarist leader of the EU. While campaigning for all things fake and gay, she has seven children.

  84. @ic1000
    @Voltarde

    > What’s the New Current Thing? Thanks to Boomers, a gerontocracy and dementia.

    As Trotsky quipped, "You may not be interested in Unfunded Liabilities and Currency Collapse, but they are interested in you."

    1. Since the U.S. is still in the gradually phase, this won't be the next New Current Thing.

    2. Given the NYT's exquisite aversion to offending the amour propre of its paying subscribers, the acticle count will be a lagging rather than leading indicator of this exciting trend.

    Replies: @slumber_j

    Having just returned from nine nights in Buenos Aires, I have to say I tend to agree. The Argentine peso is now trades at around 15 percent of where it traded two years ago against the USD, so people walk around with huge wads of 1,000 peso notes (the largest denomination they print) and count out stacks of them to pay for a restaurant dinner. How can we not be headed there in the near future? Beats me.

  85. @Franz
    No, polyamory can't be a thing.

    I've been sniffing new prudishness coming on fast. The whole feeling of ick for the 40-year-old guy hitting on a twenty-something female itself doesn't gross anyone out. It's an opportunity to register disgust for complicated sexual situations.

    In the 1970s for a brief time and thanks to the Jesus Freaks, a New Chastity was going around. They call it something different every time... this time it's starting in odd places like Men Going Their Own Way. In the seventies, it was Joyce Maynard calling all men pigs. But the same tune all the same.

    Replies: @Jonathan Mason, @Ebony Obelisk

    The whole idea that couples must be very close together in age, preferably so that they would have been higschoolers or college students at the same time seems to be very American (US) and is much less common in other nations.

    More common in other countries is that a man establishes himself econonomically either by having a successful career or inheriting through a family business or deceased parents, and then looks for a wife who is young, energetic, and fertile to have his children.

    Men, even at the age of 70 are capable of fathering children, but women not so much so.

    • Agree: Franz
    • Replies: @Bill Jones
    @Jonathan Mason

    Part of the definition of the Hajnal line delineation is the later age of marriage of both sexes: later marriage, fewer kids, higher survival rate, more invested in each kid, esp education = more successful society.
    And while I'm here, Like Oscar I can resist anything but temptation;


    Men, even at the age of 70 are capable of fathering children, but women not so much so.
     
    Demands this.
    I believe women's inability to father children is not age related.

    Sorry.

    , @BB753
    @Jonathan Mason

    In the Middle Ages, in Europe, even princesses would marry between the ages of 11-16, to much older men.

    Replies: @Frau Katze

    , @Thea
    @Jonathan Mason

    It’s got nothing to do with America. The Hajnal line predates us by centuries.

    , @ben tillman
    @Jonathan Mason


    The whole idea that couples must be very close together in age, preferably so that they would have been higschoolers or college students at the same time seems to be very American (US) and is much less common in other nations.
     
    It's not even common in the US.
    , @oliver elkington
    @Jonathan Mason

    I know in other cultures the age gaps still generally are not that big, most Muslim men marry in their early or mid twenties to women in their late teens or early 20s, in China men usually go with women or girls of a similar age, i know that in Japan it is very popular for much older men to pay large sums of money to take teenage girls to restaurants, i have heard that the government is trying to clamp down on that practice though.

  86. @Art Deco
    I think the next goal of the gay lobby will be to persuade prosecutors to stop bringing charges against homosexual men who seduce adolescent males. That's not really what you mean by 'the new current thing'. The 'transgender' craze is helpful to the gay lobby because it legitimates perversion generally and because social workers, lawyers, and mental health types have been demonstrably willing to strip parents of their authority over their children to advance the interests of deviants.

    Replies: @Bill P, @Reg Cæsar

    I think the next goal of the gay lobby will be to persuade prosecutors to stop bringing charges against homosexual men who seduce adolescent males.

    They’re already practically immune to prosecution for that. Even in the old days nobody wanted to get involved, usually because they assumed the kid was gay.

    How often do you hear about gay men getting arrested for that? And yet if you go to the gay district there are always teenage junkies hanging around the clubs getting picked up by guys cruising around.

    Part of the problem is that it’s really hard to find a law-enforcement officer willing or able to play the part of adolescent gay prostitute.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Bill P

    Generally speaking, especially in the past, laws against sex (gay or straight) with teens who are close to (but slightly under) the age of consent are only rarely enforced (or else our prisons would be full) and usually only when it involves someone in a position of authority or is connected with some other incident.

    Right now there is a case involving Don Henley of the Eagles and (in order to discredit his character - I really don't understand why the judge allowed this because it is so irrelevant to the case at hand) he is being cross examined about a 16-year-old prostitute who overdosed at his home in 1980 (at the time he was given probation and a $2,500 fine). And the only reason this came to the attention of the authorities at all was because she overdosed.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13131833/The-Eagles-Don-Henley-court-prostitute-overdose.html

    Replies: @deep anonymous

  87. “I’m not much in the business of making predictions about the future, because it’s hard enough to understand what’s happening in the present. I don’t forecast the next big thing so much as try to notice the current thing. My goal is to be a historian of the present.”

    Well then, first polyamory, and then it’ll be pedophilia. After all, NAMBLA has been around for nearly half a century, so eventually they’ll persuade the LGBTQ etc to allow them into their community, under “N” or “P”.
    After all, if Mary Kay Laturneau and Jeffrey Epstein can have all the fun, then why can’t ordinary folks as well?

    Would suppose then after that, the final frontier would be…bestiality. Not much left after those two.

  88. @Anonymous
    Shades of that famous Orwell passage in which he lumps together 'nudists, pacifists, vegetarians and lunatics'.
    That passage always raises a smile with me, with that masterly juxtaposition of 'nudist' and 'lunatic' with the rest of the soy boys.
    One can almost imagine the straightlaced chain smoking Edwardian gent, Orwell, in his bemused contempt.

    Replies: @Bill Jones

    Thanks for that quote I’d forgotten it.

    As for:

    straightlaced chain smoking Edwardian gent, Orwell

    We are talking about the Eric Blair who fought for the communists in the late 1930’s?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Bill Jones

    He was an old Etonian born at the height of Edwardian pomp.

    Replies: @Bill Jones

  89. @The Anti-Gnostic
    @ScarletNumber

    I think the incidence might be higher. Recall that at one point the top three 400M runners in the world were all African men pretending to be women. Then there's the hulking Brittney Griner, who genuinely comes across as a California surfer dude who posts at iSteve.

    We also could be talking about different phenomena. Anecdotally, androgen uptake issues seem more prevalent among blacks with more RuPauls with definite gay voice and mannerisms versus the typical former athlete/PhD /Navy SEAL white tranny. (Caitlyn Jenner walks, talks and plays golf exactly like the elderly retired decathlete he is.)

    Replies: @Guest007, @ScarletNumber

    One should probably provide a cite on the top three 400 meter runners and when.

    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
    @Guest007

    Correction. 800M.

    https://i.imgur.com/7umGfQs.jpg

    Replies: @Guest007

  90. @The Anti-Gnostic
    @Guest007

    "Luxury belief" is a good term. Steve has actually talked about this. E.g. single motherhood is fine if mom is a stable multimillionaire lesbian like Jody Foster. But lower class Shaniqua or Cheyenne need to try and get married and stay married. Charles Murray refers to it as getting the elites to preach what they practice.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Guest007, @Stan Adams, @Jack D

    As has been pointed out many times, the men in the same economic position as blue collar and pink collar black women act more like another child than as a marriable male who has any prospects for the future. Marriage for those poor black women is more risk with much less reward. Then the question is whether they give up having children or be a single mother.

  91. @Jonathan Mason
    @Franz

    The whole idea that couples must be very close together in age, preferably so that they would have been higschoolers or college students at the same time seems to be very American (US) and is much less common in other nations.

    More common in other countries is that a man establishes himself econonomically either by having a successful career or inheriting through a family business or deceased parents, and then looks for a wife who is young, energetic, and fertile to have his children.

    Men, even at the age of 70 are capable of fathering children, but women not so much so.

    Replies: @Bill Jones, @BB753, @Thea, @ben tillman, @oliver elkington

    Part of the definition of the Hajnal line delineation is the later age of marriage of both sexes: later marriage, fewer kids, higher survival rate, more invested in each kid, esp education = more successful society.
    And while I’m here, Like Oscar I can resist anything but temptation;

    Men, even at the age of 70 are capable of fathering children, but women not so much so.

    Demands this.
    I believe women’s inability to father children is not age related.

    Sorry.

    • LOL: kaganovitch
  92. @Jonathan Mason
    @Franz

    The whole idea that couples must be very close together in age, preferably so that they would have been higschoolers or college students at the same time seems to be very American (US) and is much less common in other nations.

    More common in other countries is that a man establishes himself econonomically either by having a successful career or inheriting through a family business or deceased parents, and then looks for a wife who is young, energetic, and fertile to have his children.

    Men, even at the age of 70 are capable of fathering children, but women not so much so.

    Replies: @Bill Jones, @BB753, @Thea, @ben tillman, @oliver elkington

    In the Middle Ages, in Europe, even princesses would marry between the ages of 11-16, to much older men.

    • Replies: @Frau Katze
    @BB753


    In the Middle Ages, in Europe, even princesses would marry between the ages of 11-16, to much older men.
     
    Especially princesses. Marriages were arranged for political purposes.

    Replies: @BB753

  93. @anonymous
    In Los Angeles, it’s idiot negroes leading high speed car chases… every… fucking… day.

    These happened quite recently…

    https://www.youtube.com/live/1cVjjmLFmyo?si=Acm3qUkCMTJxuGJi

    https://youtu.be/CXUgZ6rvzB4

    In the vid below, the idiot negro survived, but six others did not. She had multiple reckless driving charges prior to this doozy.

    Question: Are there any stats available delineating the race of the leaders of So. Cal car chases and resulting deaths? I'm doubting it, since the stats would very likely lean absurdly towards negro offenders, enough so that would appear to be "a new thing."

    https://youtu.be/2YyXAD6p4tc

    Replies: @Pop Warner, @TWS, @Servenet

    It’s the current and the future. Maybe when they ban all internal combustion vehicles it’ll end.

  94. @R.G. Camara
    Pedophilia is only "taboo" when older straight non-alpha men go for younger but legal women.

    Pedophilia is just fine when older women teachers go for their students -- many of them don't see jail, or only have light sentences. And homosexuals are very strongly pushing to lower or remove the ages of consent or reduce penalties for violating it, as they already have in your California. Jean Paul-Sarte and Ruth Bader Ginsburg live again!

    No, the future is that straight men who aren't Chads will be legally restricted from dating any woman not approved by the hens. Likely, it will require a local Coven of Women to vote on such matters.

    Meanwhile, 8 year olds will be raped by gay 50 year olds and it will be celebrated.

    Replies: @Peter Akuleyev, @Rich

    Well, it is different. A grown man can physically force a 15 or 16 year old girl to have sex with him, a grown woman can’t physically force a teenage boy to have sex with her. Biologically impossible. And where I grew up, a teenaged boy is going to be overjoyed at having an older woman coming onto him. It should be treated differently because it is different.

    True pedophilia, which is sex with a pre-pubescent child, should of course be punished severely, male or female. I favor the death penalty, but life in prison is probably the best we can hope for in this effeminate society.

    • Replies: @SomeGuy852
    @Rich

    That's not different unless it's forced which isn't often. Teenaged girls will likely like the attention of the older man as well. That's the more natural scenario.

  95. Hmmm, when I was 25 I thought women 35-40 were sexier ( at least if they took care of themelves.) At 35? Same thing. At 35 you are too old to for the nightclub scene ( that was what we did back then) so a woman your age is more suitable than a girl in her early 20’s.

  96. @Bill P
    If the NY Times has any success convincing young people that polyamory is a good idea we can expect future articles about a "perplexing" rise in family-annihilation murders.

    Utopians have been trying polyamory pretty much forever. It has never worked out, but that doesn't stop people from trying it over and over again.

    Replies: @TWS

    Poly or celibate for cults of one kind or another. It’s something Steve noticed I think.

  97. @SFG
    @Almost Missouri

    He is pretty pale.

    There is a sense in which he is very typical of the sort of San Francisco/Brooklyn lefty upper middle class that has very few black or Latino people (though a fair number of Asians), i.e. fitting minority stereotypes of white people as responsible, studious, unwilling to get into fights and generally wimpy, etc.

    Scott Alexander's kind of a funny case as his politics are more libertarian anti-SJW from what I can tell. (He doesn't talk about Israel or immigration much and he probably has more fans on the right than left at this point.)

    So he's not white in the 50s 'red-blooded American' sense most of you mean here, but he is white in the 'Stuff White People Like' sense.


    OK, but are the polyamorists Jewish? From my experience it's pretty typical of the woke UMC, i.e. more than 2% but way less than 100. I'd probably estimate 25 or 33%--less than a majority but a significantly overrepresented minority.

    Replies: @puttheforkdown

    Scott Alexander is the most Jewish guy. He’s an early 20th century Viennese degenerate semite on steroids. An unrepentant materialist atheist, transhumanist glorified government drug dealer (read: psychiatrist) who passionately argues for women being promiscuous and for men to be happy cucks while being asexual himself. After all, the worst case scenario for polyamory is a child being abused, and that happens sometimes in monogamous marriages, so…eh, right?

    Just recently he gave out one of his grants worth tens of thousands of dollars to a trans person arguing for giving children more rights so that they can pursue underage transitioning regardless of the parents wishes.

    The lightness of his skin is irrelevant. Dude is a piece of shit and his articles have never had meaningful positive real world impact – their sole masturbatory value is in showing off his classically Jewish verbal IQ tilt while making the reader feel special for following along. I hope he disappears.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @puttheforkdown


    An unrepentant materialist atheist
     
    Atheism is just the correct intellectual position. People don't rise from the dead.

    Just recently he gave out one of his grants worth tens of thousands of dollars to a trans person arguing for giving children more rights so that they can pursue underage transitioning regardless of the parents wishes.
     
    I wish he didn't do that. The fact that you know about it shows you read him or at least keep track of news in the community, so you must find *something* interesting in him/them. The fundamental fact is that people like him run the country, not clowns like Majorie Taylor Greene. He suffered a lot of social and professional sanction for condemning feminism, calling him names because he won't go full skinhead is unwise. Even Nick Fuentes gets it now:

    https://twitter.com/ReactiveMay/status/1761222605057528223
    , @Anonymous
    @puttheforkdown


    An unrepentant materialist atheist
     
    Atheism is just the correct intellectual position. People don't rise from the dead.

    Just recently he gave out one of his grants worth tens of thousands of dollars to a trans person arguing for giving children more rights so that they can pursue underage transitioning regardless of the parents wishes.
     
    I wish he didn't do that. The fact that you know about it shows you read him or at least keep track of news in the community, so you must find *something* interesting there. The fundamental fact is that people like him run the country, not clowns like Majorie Taylor Greene. He suffered a lot of social and professional sanction for condemning feminism, calling him names because he won't go full skinhead is unwise. Even Nick Fuentes gets it now:

    https://twitter.com/ReactiveMay/status/1761222605057528223

    Replies: @SFG

  98. @Gruesome Newsom
    I’m a younger millennial and I notice that a lot of 30 something’s moving back into their aging boomer parents homes. Economy isn’t good obviously. The next big thing is millennials inheriting their boomer parents empty McMansions?

    Replies: @Anon7

    I don’t know if it will be the “New Thing” but the current thing is leftist state governors trying to convince people to take migrants into their homes.

    So, combining the trend of millennial children moving back into their parent’s McMansions, there are still empty rooms. So, fill them with migrants, who can help take care of the aging parents, and since these migrants will collect our tax dollars, they can also contribute some money.

    New business model.

    • Disagree: Colin Wright
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Anon7

    Yep, and they will incentivize this policy by encouraging the 'migrants' to work as domestic servants in lieu of paying rent, and what do you know, big fat dumb stupid whitey is cast way back in the 18th century when he was the big fat evil oppressor of people of color, importing them and forcing them to do his shit work for no pay.

    , @David Davenport
    @Anon7

    So, combining the trend of millennial children moving back into their parent’s McMansions, there are still empty rooms. So, fill them with migrants, who can help take care of the aging parents, and since these migrants will collect our tax dollars, they can also contribute some money.

    Migrants are a net drain on American tax dollars. That's a CommieCrat idea.

    Better business model: Encourage old American stock children or grandchildren to have more babies, and maybe live with the old folks. This was a common practice in the old days.

    , @Colin Wright
    @Anon7


    ...New business model.
     
    No it's not. It's ultimately the idea that you can spend more than you make.

    Just keep borrowing more money. In your case, you would just keep importing more people.
  99. @Henry Canaday
    A lot of this novelty-hunting in sexual relations and behavior springs from the no-fault divorce revolution of about a half century ago. Before this revolution a word association test for “marriage” would produce words like “duty” and “responsibility.” After the revolution, the same association test would produce “rights,” or “privileges” or “benefits.”

    Before no-fault divorce, marriage was basically a state in which the government stood ready to coerce both spouses to fulfill duties to one another, like support, sexual relations and help in child-raising. After no-fault, the government is mostly coercing the rest of society, employers and taxpayers, to confer benefits and subsidies and privileges on whatever parties were supposed to be “married.”

    Replies: @Prester John, @Ralph L, @Thea, @New Dealer

    I agree but cannot select that,

    World War T wasn’t ever the next new thing. Transsexuals melted into the general sexual decadence of social decline.

    After sexual morality no longer derived from marriage and the role of parenthood , it’s been a free-for-all.

    If you can get divorced and remarried, then why can’t you have sex before marriage? If you can have sex before marriage, why can’t it be with either a male or a female as you choose? If you don’t want to be a parent, why can’t you do what you want with your baby? If you don’t want to be a man, why can’t you be a woman?
    If you weren’t born in the USA but want to live in America , why can’t you?

    Without marriage and strong sexual taboos, no civilization can prosper.

    The is no “next thing” when you are just rolling g around in the sewer already.

    • Agree: DenverGregg
  100. The ladies who write these articles are inches from going face-first into The Wall and they imagine that some polyamorous arrangements will involve smart, stylish, together women with careers (like them) who are so quirky and irresistable that any number of interesting, variously talented men will be into it.

    ‘Along Came Poly.’ Not.

    This stuff is strictly for nerds and spergs. We already have ‘polyamory.’ You just have to make sure the girls don’t find out about each other.

    • LOL: ben tillman
    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Ghost of Bull Moose

    Not just the girls. I have in my career come across several instances where men had two complete families in different cities. They (especially family #1 - the wife to which he is legally married, sometimes the other one knows) only found out about each other only after the man dies. This leads to lawsuits quite often. I am talking about successful white men, not ghetto baby daddies. Lindbergh being a famous example.

    Christianity is unusual for requiring monogamy. This was not true of Judaism or of Islam or many Eastern religions. It appears that they inherited this from the Romans. Christianity was a Middle Eastern religion that was taken up by Greeks and Romans and so it has aspects of both cultures. For example they also followed the food customs of the Romans and not the Jews. It may be that certain aspects of culture are deeper than any new religion so that the new religion yields to the deeper practice. Of course this will be given a religious rationalization just as the Christian rationalization as to why the Biblical dietary restrictions no longer apply to them. Or sometimes it is the other way around. Mormons are notoriously white bread American in their culture but certain aspects of their new religion (polygamy) took precedence. When new religion clashes with existing culture it doesn't always go the same way.

    As the West becomes post-Christian/non-Western, it may be that monogamy is a Roman/Christian practice that will fall away.

    Replies: @ben tillman, @Ghost of Bull Moose

  101. @Jonathan Mason
    @Franz

    The whole idea that couples must be very close together in age, preferably so that they would have been higschoolers or college students at the same time seems to be very American (US) and is much less common in other nations.

    More common in other countries is that a man establishes himself econonomically either by having a successful career or inheriting through a family business or deceased parents, and then looks for a wife who is young, energetic, and fertile to have his children.

    Men, even at the age of 70 are capable of fathering children, but women not so much so.

    Replies: @Bill Jones, @BB753, @Thea, @ben tillman, @oliver elkington

    It’s got nothing to do with America. The Hajnal line predates us by centuries.

  102. @The Anti-Gnostic
    @Guest007

    "Luxury belief" is a good term. Steve has actually talked about this. E.g. single motherhood is fine if mom is a stable multimillionaire lesbian like Jody Foster. But lower class Shaniqua or Cheyenne need to try and get married and stay married. Charles Murray refers to it as getting the elites to preach what they practice.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Guest007, @Stan Adams, @Jack D

    Back in 1992 Dan Quayle made a speech criticizing Hollywood for producing movies and TV shows that portrayed single motherhood in a positive light. In particular he criticized the sitcom Murphy Brown.

    This became what Biden would call “a big f**king deal” – it was discussed endlessly in the media. Newspaper columnists spilled oceans of ink in their zeal to denounce Quayle as a clueless moron and to venerate Murphy Brown as a veritable goddess of fertility.

    When the show returned from summer hiatus, the presidential campaign was in full swing. The season premiere was an hourlong Very Special Episode devoted to ripping Dan Quayle a new one. The critics heaped praise on it.

    But then a few days later Ross Perot rejoined the race, and nobody gave a crap about Quayle anymore because they knew that Bush was finished.

    And then about twenty years later Candice Bergen admitted that Quayle had been right.

    • Agree: DenverGregg
    • Replies: @res
    @Stan Adams

    Some followup on your last sentence. It is interesting to see the time progression.

    1992 the original controversy.
    https://www.deseret.com/1992/9/14/19004537/bergen-was-amused-then-offended-by-quayle/

    But note her first sentence here.


    Bergen says a lot of thought went into the decision to have Murphy become a single mother. "I myself, as a parent, believe the ideal is you have a two-parent family. I'm the last person to think fathers are obsolete," she said. But, "I think it was absolutely the right decision to have the baby. Absolutely. For Murphy and the show."
     
    6/23/1998 CB doubles down.
    https://www.nytimes.com/1998/06/23/opinion/l-murphy-brown-s-values-543110.html

    Though a bit hard to reconcile that with this from 7/27/98.
    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/magazine/1727756/murphy-brown-redux/

    2002 CB more conciliatory.
    https://www.sun-sentinel.com/2002/07/12/quayles-ok-bergen-admits/

    5/25/2012 The WaPo (of all places) says Quayle was right.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/20-years-later-it-turns-out-dan-quayle-was-right-about-murphy-brown-and-unmarried-moms/2012/05/25/gJQAsNCJqU_story.html

    This 2018 article recaptures the history including a 2012 quote from CB.
    https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/uh-oh-immigration-hawks-are-underwhelmed-white-houses-proposal/

    By 2012, Bergen declared, “I never have really said much about the whole episode, which was endless. But his speech was a perfectly intelligent speech about fathers not being dispensable and nobody agreed with that more than I did.”
     

    Replies: @Stan Adams, @ScarletNumber

  103. Meanwhile:

    • Agree: deep anonymous
    • Thanks: J.Ross
  104. @Almost Missouri

    Are you a person with a three-digit IQ who likes writing down rules and then rewriting them when they don’t work, who likes to tell yourself that you aren’t a slave to your sexual passions like all those underclass rednecks with their “random families”? You are instead an ethical polyamorist.
     
    For what it's worth, I briefly shared an apartment with a three-digit IQ guy who prominently displayed The Ethical Polyamorist or some such title on the coffee table. (It was the first time I saw the phrase, and my initial thought was, "Dude, if you want to step out on your girlfriend, then step out on your girlfriend. You don't need to make a pseudo-philosophical movement out of it!") As it emerged, this ethical polyamory business extended not only beyond plain old monogamy, but beyond gender, race, and perhaps species. The "Ethical Polyamory" title was just lying there as a slightly subtle announcement that you might share his intimacy tonight but tomorrow he'd be sharing his intimacy with _______ [fill in the blank, just don't tell me how you did it, please].

    Now that Steve mentions it, "ethical polyamory" may also have served as a class status marker, sort of like "Effective Altruism" before that FTX weirdo nuked the brand: "I'm not some flyover lowbrow doing random stuff to please my amygdala, there is a method here, people!" A method of cobbled-together hippie vagaries in mutual contradiction, perhaps, but a "method" nonetheless.

    Speaking of new turns of phrase, this is the first I'm seeing this "random families" phrase, though I've seen plenty enough of the actuality, but I didn't know there was a book called that, and from 20 years ago no less, back when the FBI still investigated criminals rather than political opponents, quaint as that sounds now. The book comes with an endorsement from Alex "There Are No Children Here" Kotlowitz, a book I actually have read and can tell you is badly observed and badly written, so if that's the authority on which one reads Random Families, no thanks, but I guess there was (is?) a cultural moment where very white people retail the supposed travails of dusky nobodies for publishing credit.

    And speaking of very white people...


    the polyamorists—who tend to be extremely white, Scott Alexander-level white
     
    "Scott Alexander-level white", lol. Oh wait, is "Scott Alexander-level white" a dog whistle for Ashk mischling...

    Replies: @SFG, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Bill Jones

    https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/highlights-from-the-comments-on-polyamory

    This all makes a lot more sense if you can remember his old internet posts where he discusses being on SSRI meds non-stop since before puberty and he has no sex drive. Scott may have been the only 22 year old male in the history of the universe with no sex drive. His wife probably has a sex urge for about a half hour once a month but of course that isn’t any of our business.

  105. @The Anti-Gnostic
    @Guest007

    "Luxury belief" is a good term. Steve has actually talked about this. E.g. single motherhood is fine if mom is a stable multimillionaire lesbian like Jody Foster. But lower class Shaniqua or Cheyenne need to try and get married and stay married. Charles Murray refers to it as getting the elites to preach what they practice.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Guest007, @Stan Adams, @Jack D

    These are two contradictory things – the people who could BEST afford single parenthood are the ones who least engage in it and the ones who can least afford it do it the most. The rich used to preach “middle class values” to the poor but that’s so judgmental. Can’t be judgmental anymore.

    Musk is an exception. He has babies all over the place like some ghetto baby daddy. 11 IIRC. He has custody of one of them and brings him everywhere, accompanied by the kid’s nanny and bodyguard. Musk believes that smart, rich people having a lot of children is eugenic. Nazi!

    I believe this kid’s name is X Æ A-12 Musk.

    • Troll: R.G. Camara
    • Replies: @Dutch Boy
    @Jack D

    He could have easily followed my grandfathers' path if he wanted a lot of offspring. They did it the old-fashioned way, with ten and eleven children respectively. What he actually owes his children is a normal,happy family life.

    , @deep anonymous
    @Jack D


    "I believe this kid’s name is X Æ A-12 Musk."
     
    I wasn't sure whether you were being serious or were being sarcastic, so I looked it up. Only a billionaire could do something so bizarre and not completely screw up his kid. Remarkable.

    Elon Musk changed son’s name from X Æ A-12 to comply with law
    , @Frau Katze
    @Jack D


    I believe this kid’s name is X Æ A-12 Musk.
     
    I’m a Musk fan but I think his taste in names (for kids and companies) leaves something to be desired.
  106. @BB753
    @MEH 0910

    Is that the next thing? Beta males marrying ugly lesbians?

    Replies: @LG5, @Dutch Boy

    Here in California, they marry non-white women. My brother’s first wife had a Mexican mother, who told him she would never marry a Mexican man because they liked to get drunk and beat their wives. Ironically, her white husband was an alcoholic college professor but a non-wife beater. So there is a plentiful non-white female market here for white Betas, considering the competition.

    • Replies: @BB753
    @Dutch Boy

    Well, I'd rather marry a straight Mexican or Asian woman than an ugly white lesbian. Maybe Cohen thought marrying any shiksa, even a lesbian one, was better than celibacy or marrying a Jewish woman.

    Replies: @SFG, @R.G. Camara

  107. @Jack D
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    These are two contradictory things - the people who could BEST afford single parenthood are the ones who least engage in it and the ones who can least afford it do it the most. The rich used to preach "middle class values" to the poor but that's so judgmental. Can't be judgmental anymore.

    Musk is an exception. He has babies all over the place like some ghetto baby daddy. 11 IIRC. He has custody of one of them and brings him everywhere, accompanied by the kid's nanny and bodyguard. Musk believes that smart, rich people having a lot of children is eugenic. Nazi!

    https://twitter.com/Iam_StephenMusk/status/1761553781135725015

    I believe this kid's name is X Æ A-12 Musk.

    Replies: @Dutch Boy, @deep anonymous, @Frau Katze

    He could have easily followed my grandfathers’ path if he wanted a lot of offspring. They did it the old-fashioned way, with ten and eleven children respectively. What he actually owes his children is a normal,happy family life.

  108. I’ve noticed the femail-centric Daily Mail seems to be pushing the Ultra-Processed-Food trope as being what could be ailing you.

    • Replies: @Muggles
    @Joe Stalin

    Agree, that is now being pushed by Those Who Know More About Your Health Than You Do.

    Not sure if there is some published schedule for these Mantras From On High or not, or we just see or read them as they roll them out.

    In this case, as sometimes is the case, there is merit to the idea, though as usual, very vague as to details.

    What is "Ultra Processed" as opposed to just processed for shelf life or taste?

    Now some of that is just junk food with a lot of added sugar (carbs) or fats. Also easy to prepare and store for long periods. Or added salt and flavors. Because humans like that.

    Like most of these food fads, promoted by health Nazis (who push things you don't like or won't eat) there is some merit and a lot of generalities. "Pure food" is often superior but with long supply chains, not practical or cheap enough for most people to afford. Raw foods are slow to cook and often hard to prepare. Turnips anyone?

    I'm sure that the upcoming Soros-Gates Insect Paste will qualify, once it is demanded by the Save the Planet Crowd for our own good. That will require some "ultra processing" but by then, that fad will be old hat.

    Of course killing natural insects to eat will engender "danger! danger!" cries as they often pollinate plants and aerate the soil, and provide food for other animals. So the Soros-Gates V. 2.0 Paste will be made from DNA modified lab grown insects, not real ones.

    And Soylent Green will be eco friendly too. A Wuhan-Fauci Product! You Can Recycle YOU!

    "Made Of, By and For People Just Like You!"

    Replies: @Jack D

  109. @Ghost of Bull Moose
    The ladies who write these articles are inches from going face-first into The Wall and they imagine that some polyamorous arrangements will involve smart, stylish, together women with careers (like them) who are so quirky and irresistable that any number of interesting, variously talented men will be into it.

    'Along Came Poly.' Not.

    This stuff is strictly for nerds and spergs. We already have 'polyamory.' You just have to make sure the girls don't find out about each other.

    Replies: @Jack D

    Not just the girls. I have in my career come across several instances where men had two complete families in different cities. They (especially family #1 – the wife to which he is legally married, sometimes the other one knows) only found out about each other only after the man dies. This leads to lawsuits quite often. I am talking about successful white men, not ghetto baby daddies. Lindbergh being a famous example.

    Christianity is unusual for requiring monogamy. This was not true of Judaism or of Islam or many Eastern religions. It appears that they inherited this from the Romans. Christianity was a Middle Eastern religion that was taken up by Greeks and Romans and so it has aspects of both cultures. For example they also followed the food customs of the Romans and not the Jews. It may be that certain aspects of culture are deeper than any new religion so that the new religion yields to the deeper practice. Of course this will be given a religious rationalization just as the Christian rationalization as to why the Biblical dietary restrictions no longer apply to them. Or sometimes it is the other way around. Mormons are notoriously white bread American in their culture but certain aspects of their new religion (polygamy) took precedence. When new religion clashes with existing culture it doesn’t always go the same way.

    As the West becomes post-Christian/non-Western, it may be that monogamy is a Roman/Christian practice that will fall away.

    • Thanks: deep anonymous, ic1000
    • Replies: @ben tillman
    @Jack D


    Not just the girls. I have in my career come across several instances where men had two complete families in different cities. They (especially family #1 – the wife to which he is legally married, sometimes the other one knows) only found out about each other only after the man dies. This leads to lawsuits quite often. I am talking about successful white men, not ghetto baby daddies. Lindbergh being a famous example.
     
    Like H.L. Hunt and his three families.

    Christianity is unusual for requiring monogamy. This was not true of Judaism or of Islam or many Eastern religions. It appears that they inherited this from the Romans. Christianity was a Middle Eastern religion that was taken up by Greeks and Romans and so it has aspects of both cultures. For example they also followed the food customs of the Romans and not the Jews. It may be that certain aspects of culture are deeper than any new religion so that the new religion yields to the deeper practice.
     
    See:

    The Germanization of Early Medieval Christianity: A Sociohistorical Approach to Religious Transformation

    --James C. Russell

    Replies: @Jack D

    , @Ghost of Bull Moose
    @Jack D

    Yes. Louis Kahn had three such families IIRC. I'm not sure it's so unheard of.

  110. @Jack D
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    These are two contradictory things - the people who could BEST afford single parenthood are the ones who least engage in it and the ones who can least afford it do it the most. The rich used to preach "middle class values" to the poor but that's so judgmental. Can't be judgmental anymore.

    Musk is an exception. He has babies all over the place like some ghetto baby daddy. 11 IIRC. He has custody of one of them and brings him everywhere, accompanied by the kid's nanny and bodyguard. Musk believes that smart, rich people having a lot of children is eugenic. Nazi!

    https://twitter.com/Iam_StephenMusk/status/1761553781135725015

    I believe this kid's name is X Æ A-12 Musk.

    Replies: @Dutch Boy, @deep anonymous, @Frau Katze

    “I believe this kid’s name is X Æ A-12 Musk.”

    I wasn’t sure whether you were being serious or were being sarcastic, so I looked it up. Only a billionaire could do something so bizarre and not completely screw up his kid. Remarkable.

    Elon Musk changed son’s name from X Æ A-12 to comply with law

  111. @Bill P
    @Art Deco


    I think the next goal of the gay lobby will be to persuade prosecutors to stop bringing charges against homosexual men who seduce adolescent males.
     
    They're already practically immune to prosecution for that. Even in the old days nobody wanted to get involved, usually because they assumed the kid was gay.

    How often do you hear about gay men getting arrested for that? And yet if you go to the gay district there are always teenage junkies hanging around the clubs getting picked up by guys cruising around.

    Part of the problem is that it's really hard to find a law-enforcement officer willing or able to play the part of adolescent gay prostitute.

    Replies: @Jack D

    Generally speaking, especially in the past, laws against sex (gay or straight) with teens who are close to (but slightly under) the age of consent are only rarely enforced (or else our prisons would be full) and usually only when it involves someone in a position of authority or is connected with some other incident.

    Right now there is a case involving Don Henley of the Eagles and (in order to discredit his character – I really don’t understand why the judge allowed this because it is so irrelevant to the case at hand) he is being cross examined about a 16-year-old prostitute who overdosed at his home in 1980 (at the time he was given probation and a $2,500 fine). And the only reason this came to the attention of the authorities at all was because she overdosed.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13131833/The-Eagles-Don-Henley-court-prostitute-overdose.html

    • Replies: @deep anonymous
    @Jack D


    "Right now there is a case involving Don Henley of the Eagles and (in order to discredit his character – I really don’t understand why the judge allowed this because it is so irrelevant to the case at hand) he is being cross examined about a 16-year-old prostitute who overdosed at his home in 1980 (at the time he was given probation and a $2,500 fine)."
     
    I think the trend has been to relax Rule 404(b) in rape/sexual assault cases. In Maryland, for instance, a statute was enacted doing exactly that because the General Assembly was unhappy with a Court of Appeals decision reversing a rapist's conviction for that reason.

    (For the non-lawyers, Rule 404(b) is the evidentiary rule restricting the admissibility of propensity evidence. In a criminal trial, the defendant's guilt of prior or non-charged conduct is presumptively out of bounds except for supposedly narrow exceptions, turning on things like motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, absence of mistake, or lack of accident. MIMIC Rule)

    Replies: @Jack D

  112. The new thing is that academics (and eventualy, judges) will say BIPOCs cannot be guilty of crimes against whites:

    “Being guilty of a crime against someone means you have power over that person. Since non-whites have no powers, they cannot be guilty of any crimes against a white person.”

    Forget “The Future Is Female.” It’s gonna be replaced by “The Future Is Fani.”

  113. In 1917, Church canon law raised the age of the bride to 14, while the groom had to be 16.

    I guess marriages that early were quite uncommon in many parts of Europe, But I still find it a remarkable transformation of views, how many men now claim that any attraction to a girl even slightly under 18 is pedophilia.

    • Replies: @Muggles
    @songbird

    Prior to effective modern birth control (circa 1960) there were a lot of "underage" girls who became pregnant, usually by older males.

    Still common in Third World places and in poorer, mainly non White communities elsewhere.

    Prior to birth control, most of these births were farmed out to orphanages or adopted by relatives. Or the young couple got married, whatever the local custom allowed.

    One suspects that in Paleo and ancient times, most of our ancestors were born "under age of consent" since biology and sex drives start pretty early. One reason why "the patriarchy" was the predominant form of family organization.

    Young females were locked up by family members and older females in clan arrangements to keep from being impregnated. Also, as a consequence, could be bartered as "brides" to outsiders for goods, livestock, cash or clan affiliate benefits. Still a common practice in places like Muslim or African, Indian societies.

    Of course when average lifespans were under 40, this was not only common but probably necessary.

    Those fairy tale "princess brides" and literary ones like Juliet were often "under age" by modern standards. Mortality by childbirth also very high. A different world.

    Replies: @Jack D, @Reg Cæsar

  114. @Jonathan Mason
    @Franz

    The whole idea that couples must be very close together in age, preferably so that they would have been higschoolers or college students at the same time seems to be very American (US) and is much less common in other nations.

    More common in other countries is that a man establishes himself econonomically either by having a successful career or inheriting through a family business or deceased parents, and then looks for a wife who is young, energetic, and fertile to have his children.

    Men, even at the age of 70 are capable of fathering children, but women not so much so.

    Replies: @Bill Jones, @BB753, @Thea, @ben tillman, @oliver elkington

    The whole idea that couples must be very close together in age, preferably so that they would have been higschoolers or college students at the same time seems to be very American (US) and is much less common in other nations.

    It’s not even common in the US.

  115. @Mark G.
    The next big thing for the left will be a four year long acute case of Trump Derangement Syndrome after Trump becomes president again. Biden's approval ratings have sunk so low that not even vote fraud in the big Democrat run cities will push him across the finish line.

    Things like the recent survey of political science academics saying Biden is the 14th best president of all time while Trump comes in last aren't going to help Biden either. Intelligent people know now that the higher education system is woke through and through so a bunch of leftist college professors giving Trump a flunking grade as president is just something they laugh at.

    Replies: @International Jew

    Nah, they can win this one too if they want. They’ll let Trump win if they think there’s a financial crisis coming (and there is; the national debt is unsustainable). In that case, they’ll want the GOP to take the blame.

    • Agree: deep anonymous
  116. @AnotherDad
    @SFG


    Terrible for childrearing–you might think having more responsible adults around would be good, but these people are rarely responsible.
     
    Agreed.

    But I think it's even worse than that. What kids really need/want is some sort of stability--people who love them, who put their needs first, like breakfast in the morning, a packed lunch box and some dinner at 6.

    But people sleeping around flat out means instability, as new passions flare or old ones--perhaps the ones between the parents wane. This is especially true for women sleeping around, as women get these big hormone doses that encourage them to bond with a man they sleep with.

    If you want high quality parental provision, then you really want the traditional--ideally with dad on mom 3 times a week keeping everything humming and the bond strong.

    Replies: @New Dealer

    Yes, polyamory would be terrible for children.

    There is another huge drawback. In a normal household of man, woman, couple of kids, you can never find a damned thing. Somebody didn’t put the can opener back, you find it a few days later under the sink. Or one of the grownups decides to reorganize the kitchen cupboards again. You find your razor in the toilet tank and your shaving cream in the backyard. Your best sweater is missing for some reason. Your socket set is no longer with your tools, but somehow ended up with the pots and pans.

    All that would be exponentially worse in a polyamorous household.

    • LOL: ben tillman, ChrisZ
    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @New Dealer

    Heinlein proposed a system of polyamory which would exploit specialization: one person's great with kids, one person's a great cook, one person ensures that the can opener doesn't go walkies, one person's good with money and does everyone's taxes.

    Replies: @njguy73

    , @Muggles
    @New Dealer


    All that would be exponentially worse in a polyamorous household.
     
    And there is the well known fact that women all get along very well when living together in close quarters.

    Daughters love moms, sisters love sisters. grandma loves all her girls, and those sharing the same guys enjoy the sweet benefits of female solidarity.

    What can go wrong?
    , @DenverGregg
    @New Dealer

    a poly group that appears to include three girls and two boys moved in near me a couple years ago. it is now by far the worst kept house on the block. all their vehicles are barely-functioning and replete with dents and scratches.

    , @hhsiii
    @New Dealer

    My wife and daughter complained that we were out of sour cream. I said no I bought some. They said nope, couldn’t find it in the fridge. It was found on the floor under a book shelf in the living room a week later. I have two boys age 7 and 9. One of them must have put it there but no idea why.

    , @Colin Wright
    @New Dealer


    '...You find your razor in the toilet tank and your shaving cream in the backyard. Your best sweater is missing for some reason. Your socket set is no longer with your tools, but somehow ended up with the pots and pans...'
     
    You exaggerate, but this is a true story.

    Take my wife...please.

    So after a move she unpacks, then is out of town for a few weeks a little later.

    I can't find anything. She says she put it all away logically. I eventually find the butter dish.

    It's in the upstairs bathroom.
  117. @Henry Canaday
    A lot of this novelty-hunting in sexual relations and behavior springs from the no-fault divorce revolution of about a half century ago. Before this revolution a word association test for “marriage” would produce words like “duty” and “responsibility.” After the revolution, the same association test would produce “rights,” or “privileges” or “benefits.”

    Before no-fault divorce, marriage was basically a state in which the government stood ready to coerce both spouses to fulfill duties to one another, like support, sexual relations and help in child-raising. After no-fault, the government is mostly coercing the rest of society, employers and taxpayers, to confer benefits and subsidies and privileges on whatever parties were supposed to be “married.”

    Replies: @Prester John, @Ralph L, @Thea, @New Dealer

    The Chicago economists, don’t recall the cite, argued that no-fault divorce worsens the bargaining position of the wife. The party with more resources (can try harder, can wait longer, can more afford to walk away) has a bargaining advantage over the party with fewer resources . On average, wives are at a bargaining disadvantage in a separation, because their time spent with children in the household makes them less trained and less senior in the labor market compared to the husband, and wives are more emotionally attached to the children.

    In a fault regime, both parties have to consent to dissolution, which equalizes their bargaining power.

    And, according to my forgotten source, data support the prediction: when a non-fault regime is imposed women receive worse divorce settlements.

    And, if I remember correctly, the source shows that women started to delay marriage and invest more in college tightly in response to the advent of no-fault divorce regimes (measurable because no-fault started in different states in different years).

    If I have it wrong, correct me kindly.

    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    @New Dealer

    But... afaik (certainly in the UK) no fault divorce where wife gets the kids (nearly all cases) means

    a) wife keeps the house (even if she needs to up the mortgage)
    b) she gets cash support from hubby "because of the kids".

    Hubby ends up in a bedsit and sees the kids on weekends.

    And yet and yet ... of our little group of young middle class parents, the men whose wives binned them out are all partnered again, some with children by Wife #2. All the women who did the binning are single.

    Replies: @Bill Jones

  118. @MEH 0910
    https://www.moviemaker.com/drive-away-dolls-ethan-coen-tricia-cooke/

    Drive-Away Dolls: How Ethan Coen and Tricia Cooke’s Long Marriage Shaped Their Lesbian Road-Trip Movie
     

    [...]
    I let Ethan and Joel know that I really wanted to work as an editor, and asked if they had any positions available in New York as an apprentice,” says Cooke. “Apparently they already had an apprentice, but they made room for me too, so that was kind.”

    Cooke hit it off with Ethan Coen almost immediately. But they wanted different things.

    “Ethan asked me on a date and we went to see Drugstore Cowboy,” she says. “I told him, ‘I’m a lesbian, I’m not interested.’”

    So they became friends for a while. But the relationship evolved. They married in 1993, and had two kids.

    They also made amazing films together: Cooke, now very much a fan of the Coens’ work, was the assistant editor of their 1991 film Barton Fink and 1994 follow-up The Hudsucker Proxy. And Cooke became the editor of their 1998 The Big Lebowski, 2000’s O Brother, Where Art Thou?, and 2001’s The Man Who Wasn’t There. She edited the latter with the brothers, who used their editing pseudonym, Roderick Jaynes.

    So they became friends for a while. But the relationship evolved. They married in 1993, and had two kids.

    But sometime after that, Joel and Ethan Coen started using Final Cut to edit. And Cooke came to a personal decision involving her kids.

    “As they got a little older, I realized they were going to grow up and I wasn’t going to be able to spend any time with them if I was in the cutting room 10 to 12 hours a day, which is often the case,” says Cooke. “So I decided to slow down and start writing more.”

    She co-directed a documentary with her friend Jennifer Arnold called Where the Girls Are, a comedic short about the history, parties and conflicts of the Dinah Shore Weekend, a giant lesbian pool party in Palm Springs. It won the Outstanding Narrative Short Film at Outfest in 2003.

    She also co-directed the 2008 short “Don’t Mess With Texas” with Carrie Schrader. Cooke co-wrote the film, about two young lesbians who run into trouble at a diner, with Coen.

    “Being married to Ethan and being queer there’s always a little disconnect sometimes,” she laughs. “I wanted to be able to make queer films as well.”

    Coen and Cooke decided in the aughts that they should write a feature screenplay, which they originally called Drive-Away Dykes.

    “We wrote Drive-Away Dykes together many, many years ago as a way for us to spend time together,” says Cooke.

    By then, the couple were no longer in a traditional partnership.

    “We have a very non-traditional marriage and relationship where there’s a bigger unit,” says Cooke. “I have a partner and Ethan has another partner.”

    She adds: “It’s not easy sometimes and it can be very difficult for even our friends and family to understand. You navigate it one day at a time. We’ve been in this kind of dynamic for over 20 years, and we still take it one day at a time.”

    “It’s funny because our whole relationship is like, “What, me worry?” says Coen, quoting Mad Magazine poster boy Alfred E. Newman. “And that’s also the movie.”

    So that’s the backstory of Drive-Away Dolls. Or Drive-Away Dykes. Whichever you prefer.
     

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drive-Away_Dolls

    https://screenrant.com/drive-away-dolls-movie-box-office-opening-weekend/


    Ethan Coen's New Movie Has Disastrous Box Office Opening, Misses Top 5 In First Weekend
    The new Ethan Coen movie Drive-Away Dolls barely makes it into the Top 10 in its domestic opening weekend, landing at No. 8 with a paltry debut.
     
    https://www.slashfilm.com/1526800/ethan-coen-drive-away-dolls-box-office-disappointment/

    Ethan Coen's Drive-Away Dolls Is A Big Box Office Disappointment
     
    DRIVE-AWAY DOLLS - Official Trailer [HD] - Only In Theaters February 23
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oy0RYiQRWUk
    Jun 23, 2023

    Written by Ethan Coen and Tricia Cooke, this comedy caper follows Jamie, an uninhibited free spirit bemoaning yet another breakup with a girlfriend, and her demure friend Marian who desperately needs to loosen up. In search of a fresh start, the two embark on an impromptu road trip to Tallahassee, but things quickly go awry when they cross paths with a group of inept criminals along the way. Directed by Ethan Coen.
     
    DRIVE-AWAY DOLLS - Official Trailer 2 [HD] - Only In Theaters February 23
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vy_7UGICJU
    Feb 6, 2024

    Replies: @Redneck Farmer, @BB753, @SFG, @Muggles, @anonymous, @AnotherDad

    As if we needed further evidence that many Hollywood films are created by mentally ill moral degenerates.

    Tolerance is one thing; celebration of sickness is quite another.

    Of course some of the latest buzz about American youth suggests that males are afraid of females and females are claiming to be “bisexual” in record numbers.

    I suspect that beneath all of the media hype things are not much different than before.

    “Fear of sex” due to AIDS and mentally ill females can certainly cool the male ardor. As for women, the mad feminist “rage” doesn’t just happen once a month. It now becomes a political stance by hating on Jews who for some reason don’t like their misogynist, anti gay patriarchal terrorist loving neighbors. But if you have common sense and ignore Woke media, you will be okay.

    Meanwhile rape loving migrants flood into Dem big city strongholds in Europe and the US/Canada.

    What is a boy/girl going to do?

    Many are moving back into mama and daddy’s homestead to play video games and stream inane Coen brothers dreck about lesbians.

    I think things are better in Kansas, Dorothy…

  119. https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/14/us/fertility-fraud-accidental-incest-invs/index.html

    ‘I slept with my half-sibling’: Woman’s horror story reflects loosely regulated nature of US fertility industry

    [MORE]

    (CNN) – Victoria Hill never quite understood how she could be so different from her father – in looks and in temperament. The 39-year-old licensed clinical social worker from suburban Connecticut used to joke that perhaps she was the mailman’s child.

    Her joke eventually became no laughing matter. Worried about a health issue, and puzzled because neither of her parents had suffered any of the symptoms, Hill purchased a DNA testing kit from 23andMe a few years ago and sent her DNA to the genomics company.

    What should have been a routine quest to learn more about herself turned into a shocking revelation that she had many more siblings than just the brother she grew up with – the count now stands at 22. Some of them reached out to her and dropped more bombshells: Hill’s biological father was not the man she grew up with but a fertility doctor who had been helping her mother conceive using donated sperm. That doctor, Burton Caldwell, a sibling told her, had used his own sperm to inseminate her mother, allegedly without her consent.

    But the most devastating revelation came this summer, when Hill found out that one of her newly discovered siblings had been her high school boyfriend – one she says she easily could have married.

    “I was traumatized by this,” Hill told CNN in an exclusive interview. “Now I’m looking at pictures of people thinking, well, if he could be my sibling, anybody could be my sibling.”

    Hill’s story appears to represent one of the most extreme cases to date of fertility fraud in which fertility doctors have misled their female patients and their families by secretly using their own sperm instead of that of a donor. It also illustrates how the huge groups of siblings made possible in part by a lack of regulation can lead to a worst-case scenario coming to pass: accidental incest.

    Fertility nightmare | Woman learns doctor used own sperm for inseminations, is her biological dad

    Feb 15, 2024

    Video via CNN Newsource & Reporter Kyung Lah.

    A woman discovered a fertility doctor used his own sperm in inseminations, resulting in her having numerous siblings — including a boy she dated in high school. The horror story reflects the loosely regulated nature of the U.S. fertility industry.

    • Replies: @Ralph L
    @MEH 0910

    That was a (ripped from the headlines) Law & Order episode back in the 90s.

  120. @Jack D
    @Ghost of Bull Moose

    Not just the girls. I have in my career come across several instances where men had two complete families in different cities. They (especially family #1 - the wife to which he is legally married, sometimes the other one knows) only found out about each other only after the man dies. This leads to lawsuits quite often. I am talking about successful white men, not ghetto baby daddies. Lindbergh being a famous example.

    Christianity is unusual for requiring monogamy. This was not true of Judaism or of Islam or many Eastern religions. It appears that they inherited this from the Romans. Christianity was a Middle Eastern religion that was taken up by Greeks and Romans and so it has aspects of both cultures. For example they also followed the food customs of the Romans and not the Jews. It may be that certain aspects of culture are deeper than any new religion so that the new religion yields to the deeper practice. Of course this will be given a religious rationalization just as the Christian rationalization as to why the Biblical dietary restrictions no longer apply to them. Or sometimes it is the other way around. Mormons are notoriously white bread American in their culture but certain aspects of their new religion (polygamy) took precedence. When new religion clashes with existing culture it doesn't always go the same way.

    As the West becomes post-Christian/non-Western, it may be that monogamy is a Roman/Christian practice that will fall away.

    Replies: @ben tillman, @Ghost of Bull Moose

    Not just the girls. I have in my career come across several instances where men had two complete families in different cities. They (especially family #1 – the wife to which he is legally married, sometimes the other one knows) only found out about each other only after the man dies. This leads to lawsuits quite often. I am talking about successful white men, not ghetto baby daddies. Lindbergh being a famous example.

    Like H.L. Hunt and his three families.

    Christianity is unusual for requiring monogamy. This was not true of Judaism or of Islam or many Eastern religions. It appears that they inherited this from the Romans. Christianity was a Middle Eastern religion that was taken up by Greeks and Romans and so it has aspects of both cultures. For example they also followed the food customs of the Romans and not the Jews. It may be that certain aspects of culture are deeper than any new religion so that the new religion yields to the deeper practice.

    See:

    The Germanization of Early Medieval Christianity: A Sociohistorical Approach to Religious Transformation

    –James C. Russell

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @ben tillman

    You end up with all sorts of weird hybrids. If I say that today is Wednesday ([W]Odin's day), February 28, 2024 then the day of the week is Norse (Germanic) , the month is Roman and the year is referenced to Christianity but is written in Arabic numbers.

    Odin stands in for Mercury (or vice versa) just as the Virgin Mary stand in for the Corn Maiden in the US SW and San Lázaro stands in for Babalú Ayé in Santeria. This way when the invaders show up you can keep worshipping your old gods, you just call them by new names.

    As for German influence, of course the entire Protestant movement can be seen a result of the uneasy fit between Catholic (Greco-Roman) and Germanic thinking and character.

  121. @Matthew Kelly
    Years ago I noticed Howard Stern had started doing fewer bits with lesbians (who obviously had quickly become extremely passe) and more with incestuous-y themed stuff (see, e.g., "That's Just Wrong"). On the belief Stern had the best instincts on the direction of Western Degeneracy of anyone, I assumed incest would be the Next Current Thing. Obviously didn't happen--I suppose it smacked too much of Appalachian hillbillies for the elites and their attendant pop culture to ever latch onto.

    Anywho, perhaps @Nj Transit Commuter is correct, and we'll see something totally different such as a rise in hard-core antisemitism. And maybe in no small part due to our importing of 3rd world hordes with all their backwardness and lack of sophisticated self-delusion. Perhaps the relentless protests against Israel, miraculously persisting in the face of massive establishment pushback, are an indicator. Maybe Aaron Bushnell will be the Current Thing's patron saint. Who knows. The future might actually be written, but we aren't on that page yet even if so.

    Replies: @Bugg

    Polyamory invariably is going to be a Muslim disaster of a family gaming the system for benefits and contributing nothing while barely raising their kids. Or ugly urban weirdos in cities. Nobody thinks some aging Jewish Park Slope whore pretending to be cutting edge is a trend to follow spare a few moron overeducated Times readers. She’s a whore. It will not be Bill Paxton owning a string of hardware stores raising his prosperous productive family with multiple hot wives. It’s bad public policy. Arab countries have been a mess forever in part because excess unmarried young men.

    They thought trans was gonna fly. Alas now Bud Light has Kid Rock, the UFC and Dana White to make amends. Nobody wants to lose money. Well except Hollywood, apparently. Every movie must now feature black girl magic, or Jeffrey Wright or Mashereyechart Ali (nee Hershal Gilmore, quite boring and ordinary and or likely to attract much notice of casting directors, but black AND Muslim, hot damn! ) overacting and saying how evil those white devils are to be considered Oscar-worthy.

    • Replies: @Truth
    @Bugg


    They thought trans was gonna fly. Alas now Bud Light has Kid Rock, the UFC and Dana White to make amends. Nobody wants to lose money.
     
    It's not about money when your owners PRINT the money.
    , @Anon
    @Bugg

    Muslims in the current Western arrangement already have 4 single moms on benefits with their own apartments etc. Baby daddy comes around from time to time, he's probably on benefits too. Anything marriage related is handled by their religion, not by the infidel government. It's good to be a refugee, don't mess things up.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease

  122. @YetAnotherAnon
    None Of The Above.

    Although polyamory does seem like a recipe for split families and fatherless children, which seems to be what our betters want for us.

    Over in Europe there's definitely a mutter of distant drums. That could be the next big thing. The place seems to be full of young women politicos who think Something Must Be Done (by Someone Else) about Ukraine. Maybe white feathers will make a comeback.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/28/estonia-youngest-mp-hanah-lahe-interview

    My generation’s heart aches for Ukraine, not because we lived through a war, but because we have the negative imprint of Russian invasion from our heritage. It matters to everyone who is Estonian how things are going in Ukraine,” says Lahe. She is clear: Ukrainian victory is the only path to securing Europe: “There really isn’t any other option.
     
    OK, US Army recruitment is down (again), but who's to say that the Emotional Engineers who transformed Occupy Wall Street into Black Lives Matter can't do it all again?



    The whole world is starting to look like Idiocracy:

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/28/birth-rate-japan-record-low-2023-data-details

    The number of babies born in Japan last year fell for an eighth straight year to a new low, government data has shown, and a top official says it is critical for the country to reverse the trend in the coming half-dozen years. The 758,631 babies born in Japan in 2023 were a 5.1% decline from the previous year, according to the Health and Welfare Ministry on Tuesday. It was the lowest number of births since Japan started compiling the statistics in 1899. The number of marriages fell by 5.9% to 489,281 couples, falling below a half million for the first time in 90 years – one of the key reasons for the declining births.
     
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/28/south-korea-fertility-rate-2023-fall-record-low-incentives

    The average number of children a South Korean woman has during her lifetime fell to 0.72, from 0.78 in 2022 – a decline of nearly 8% – according to preliminary data from Statistics Korea, a government-affiliated body. The rate is well below the average of 2.1 children the country needs to maintain its current population of 51 million. Since 2018, South Korea has been the only member of the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) to have a rate below 1. In addition, South Korean women give birth for the first time at the average age of 33.6 – the highest among OECD members. If the low fertility rate persists, the population of Asia’s fifth-biggest economy is projected to almost halve to 26.8 million by 2100, according to the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington in Seattle.
     
    North Korea's fertility per female is 1.91, if this is correct:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_North_Korea

    Replies: @AndrewR, @bomag, @Muggles

    Has this Estonian babe politician ever hoisted a rifle?

    Talked to anyone with actual combat experience?

    Tallied the number of heroic female Ukrainian combat soldiers facing death?

    (That tally is probably in the low double digits).

    Like war loving neocons everywhere, bleating for “victory” is best done in warm safe surroundings secure in the knowledge that you and yours are not going to be at risk.

    Ukraine is a crazy event. In 30 years everyone will wonder why this happened. Like the 1850s Crimean War.

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @Muggles

    No one will wonder, the background is not only straightforward but partially repeated, but it is a shocking tragedy that it was allowed to happen, that, after the other debacles the neocons foisted upon us, we did not cut them up and scatter them to the winds.

    , @Jack D
    @Muggles

    Of course most people don't know the Crimean War from a hole in the ground and probably 30 years from now the same will be true of Ukraine, but for those who do know, there are a lot of parallels.

    You have an aggressive expansionist Russia opportunistically trying to take advantage of what it perceives as a weaker neighbor (the Ottoman Empire) under trumped up (similar) grounds - allegedly the protection of Orthodox Christians living in the neighbor's country. Fearing the growth of influence of the Russian Empire, the British and French (and later the Italians) intervene on the side of the weaker neighbor.

    Let's hope that the aftermath follows similar lines as well (from the Wiki):


    The Crimean War marked a turning point for the Russian Empire. The war weakened the Imperial Russian Army, drained the treasury and undermined Russia's influence in Europe. The empire would take decades to recover. Russia's humiliation forced its educated elites to identify its problems and recognise the need for fundamental reforms. They saw rapid modernisation as the sole way to recover the empire's status as a European power. The war thus became a catalyst for reforms of Russia's social institutions, including the abolition of serfdom and overhauls in the justice system, local self-government, education and military service.
     

    Replies: @Hypnotoad666, @Bardon Kaldian

  123. @Muggles
    @YetAnotherAnon

    Has this Estonian babe politician ever hoisted a rifle?

    Talked to anyone with actual combat experience?

    Tallied the number of heroic female Ukrainian combat soldiers facing death?

    (That tally is probably in the low double digits).

    Like war loving neocons everywhere, bleating for "victory" is best done in warm safe surroundings secure in the knowledge that you and yours are not going to be at risk.

    Ukraine is a crazy event. In 30 years everyone will wonder why this happened. Like the 1850s Crimean War.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Jack D

    No one will wonder, the background is not only straightforward but partially repeated, but it is a shocking tragedy that it was allowed to happen, that, after the other debacles the neocons foisted upon us, we did not cut them up and scatter them to the winds.

    • Agree: Mark G.
  124. @Stan Adams
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    Back in 1992 Dan Quayle made a speech criticizing Hollywood for producing movies and TV shows that portrayed single motherhood in a positive light. In particular he criticized the sitcom Murphy Brown.

    This became what Biden would call "a big f**king deal" - it was discussed endlessly in the media. Newspaper columnists spilled oceans of ink in their zeal to denounce Quayle as a clueless moron and to venerate Murphy Brown as a veritable goddess of fertility.

    When the show returned from summer hiatus, the presidential campaign was in full swing. The season premiere was an hourlong Very Special Episode devoted to ripping Dan Quayle a new one. The critics heaped praise on it.

    But then a few days later Ross Perot rejoined the race, and nobody gave a crap about Quayle anymore because they knew that Bush was finished.

    And then about twenty years later Candice Bergen admitted that Quayle had been right.

    Replies: @res

    Some followup on your last sentence. It is interesting to see the time progression.

    1992 the original controversy.
    https://www.deseret.com/1992/9/14/19004537/bergen-was-amused-then-offended-by-quayle/

    But note her first sentence here.

    Bergen says a lot of thought went into the decision to have Murphy become a single mother. “I myself, as a parent, believe the ideal is you have a two-parent family. I’m the last person to think fathers are obsolete,” she said. But, “I think it was absolutely the right decision to have the baby. Absolutely. For Murphy and the show.”

    6/23/1998 CB doubles down.
    https://www.nytimes.com/1998/06/23/opinion/l-murphy-brown-s-values-543110.html

    Though a bit hard to reconcile that with this from 7/27/98.
    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/magazine/1727756/murphy-brown-redux/

    2002 CB more conciliatory.
    https://www.sun-sentinel.com/2002/07/12/quayles-ok-bergen-admits/

    5/25/2012 The WaPo (of all places) says Quayle was right.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/20-years-later-it-turns-out-dan-quayle-was-right-about-murphy-brown-and-unmarried-moms/2012/05/25/gJQAsNCJqU_story.html

    This 2018 article recaptures the history including a 2012 quote from CB.
    https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/uh-oh-immigration-hawks-are-underwhelmed-white-houses-proposal/

    By 2012, Bergen declared, “I never have really said much about the whole episode, which was endless. But his speech was a perfectly intelligent speech about fathers not being dispensable and nobody agreed with that more than I did.”

    • Thanks: YetAnotherAnon
    • Replies: @Stan Adams
    @res

    May 2012 was the month that Obama reversed his public stance on gay marriage and came out in favor of LOVE!(TM).

    At the time some alleged conservatives were arguing that marriage would "civilize" gays. The idea was that if John Q. Homo and Jack D. Queer were allowed to put a ring on it, buy a house with a white picket fence, and hire a surrogate to produce a couple of designer kids - one with John's sperm and one with Jack's sperm - they'd be too busy changing diapers and planning fabulous vacations to Disney World to go carousing at the local bathhouse.

    I would imagine that the Washington Post ran a number of pro-marriage op-eds around this time - "Marriage is wonderful, so let's make it available to everyone!"

    Fast-forward ten years or so and it turns out that Disney World *is* the local bathhouse.

    , @ScarletNumber
    @res


    But his speech was a perfectly intelligent speech about fathers not being dispensable and nobody agreed with that more than I did
     
    The unstated irony of this statement is that Bergen had a very famous father. Edgar and Candice were once the most famous father/daughter pairing in Hollywood, although I do think they were eventually surpassed by Jon Voight and his daughter Angelina.

    A greater overarching point is that Democrats have the habit of demonizing Republicans during the election then many years later when it doesn't matter will praise the same individual Republicans as being model statesmen, e.g. Dan Quayle (as well as Bush 41), John McCain, Mitt Romney
  125. @New Dealer
    @AnotherDad

    Yes, polyamory would be terrible for children.

    There is another huge drawback. In a normal household of man, woman, couple of kids, you can never find a damned thing. Somebody didn't put the can opener back, you find it a few days later under the sink. Or one of the grownups decides to reorganize the kitchen cupboards again. You find your razor in the toilet tank and your shaving cream in the backyard. Your best sweater is missing for some reason. Your socket set is no longer with your tools, but somehow ended up with the pots and pans.

    All that would be exponentially worse in a polyamorous household.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Muggles, @DenverGregg, @hhsiii, @Colin Wright

    Heinlein proposed a system of polyamory which would exploit specialization: one person’s great with kids, one person’s a great cook, one person ensures that the can opener doesn’t go walkies, one person’s good with money and does everyone’s taxes.

    • Replies: @njguy73
    @J.Ross


    Heinlein proposed a system of polyamory which would exploit specialization: one person’s great with kids, one person’s a great cook, one person ensures that the can opener doesn’t go walkies, one person’s good with money and does everyone’s taxes.

     

    In a short, a spouse-by-committee.

    And didn't some Heinlein character say that specializtion was for insects? That a human should be able to butcher a hog, design a ship, cook a tasty meal, fight courageously, and die gallantly?

    Replies: @SFG

  126. “Ukraine is a crazy event. In 30 years everyone will wonder why this happened. “

    Not in the Chinese history books. It’ll be held up as an example of imperial overstretch, maybe the one that did most damage (though perhaps not, “a deal of ruin in a nation” and all that.

    “And that, children, is why today China dominates the globe!”

    (in the North Korean age/sex profile you can see the damage of the Korean War, just as WW1 left a huge sex gap in the UK and WW2 did in Russia. Ukraine is busy creating its very own right now.)

  127. You seem to assume that polyamory will involve at least some degree of hetero/bisexuality, but I assume that only the face of polyamory will involve both sexes, while the majority of any benefits of recognition will go to gay sex clubs.

    Furthermore polyamory and the pedophile push are by no means mutually exclusive. Pedos need access to kids. Loose intimate relationships can create access.

    If the “polyamorous” are a protected class, that means another parent or the state will have trouble getting kids away from monsters like these:

    https://www.wcvb.com/article/police-dispute-reports-kids-drugs-sex-toys/44319427

    BOSTON —
    Boston police are trying to set the record straight about some of the sordid details of an investigation in a South Boston apartment that involved one death and resulted in four children being referred to the Department of Children and Families.

    The incident in question occurred inside a unit at the Mary Ellen McCormack complex Saturday night. Original reports indicated the children — all under the age of 10 — were found in an apartment with sex toys, drugs, alcohol and six cross-dressing men. (Watch WCVB’s original report

    An incident report filed through the Boston Fire Department states the kids were discovered by first responders after one of the adults in the apartment was found dead. Several adults in that apartment were also accused of hiding those children in a back room.

    According to the Fire Department’s incident report, the apartment was in “extreme unsanitary conditions,” and all adults in the unit were being uncooperative and denied having children inside.

    Boston police, however, described the adults as “fully cooperative.”

    “There were four children on site who all had a parent present in the residence,” police said. “The parents and the officers who responded felt it was best for the children to stay in another room with one of the parents and took steps to avoid having the children see the deceased.”

    Police also disputed the description of the conditions in the apartment.

  128. @res
    @Stan Adams

    Some followup on your last sentence. It is interesting to see the time progression.

    1992 the original controversy.
    https://www.deseret.com/1992/9/14/19004537/bergen-was-amused-then-offended-by-quayle/

    But note her first sentence here.


    Bergen says a lot of thought went into the decision to have Murphy become a single mother. "I myself, as a parent, believe the ideal is you have a two-parent family. I'm the last person to think fathers are obsolete," she said. But, "I think it was absolutely the right decision to have the baby. Absolutely. For Murphy and the show."
     
    6/23/1998 CB doubles down.
    https://www.nytimes.com/1998/06/23/opinion/l-murphy-brown-s-values-543110.html

    Though a bit hard to reconcile that with this from 7/27/98.
    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/magazine/1727756/murphy-brown-redux/

    2002 CB more conciliatory.
    https://www.sun-sentinel.com/2002/07/12/quayles-ok-bergen-admits/

    5/25/2012 The WaPo (of all places) says Quayle was right.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/20-years-later-it-turns-out-dan-quayle-was-right-about-murphy-brown-and-unmarried-moms/2012/05/25/gJQAsNCJqU_story.html

    This 2018 article recaptures the history including a 2012 quote from CB.
    https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/uh-oh-immigration-hawks-are-underwhelmed-white-houses-proposal/

    By 2012, Bergen declared, “I never have really said much about the whole episode, which was endless. But his speech was a perfectly intelligent speech about fathers not being dispensable and nobody agreed with that more than I did.”
     

    Replies: @Stan Adams, @ScarletNumber

    May 2012 was the month that Obama reversed his public stance on gay marriage and came out in favor of LOVE!(TM).

    At the time some alleged conservatives were arguing that marriage would “civilize” gays. The idea was that if John Q. Homo and Jack D. Queer were allowed to put a ring on it, buy a house with a white picket fence, and hire a surrogate to produce a couple of designer kids – one with John’s sperm and one with Jack’s sperm – they’d be too busy changing diapers and planning fabulous vacations to Disney World to go carousing at the local bathhouse.

    I would imagine that the Washington Post ran a number of pro-marriage op-eds around this time – “Marriage is wonderful, so let’s make it available to everyone!”

    Fast-forward ten years or so and it turns out that Disney World *is* the local bathhouse.

    • LOL: deep anonymous
  129. @J.Ross
    https://i.postimg.cc/4yXNCzZS/1709130281085705.png

    Replies: @tyrone

    Thank you!………..by the way, that’s the “talented tenth” being represented there…….being ruled by these monsters will be hell on earth.

  130. @Dutch Boy
    @BB753

    Here in California, they marry non-white women. My brother's first wife had a Mexican mother, who told him she would never marry a Mexican man because they liked to get drunk and beat their wives. Ironically, her white husband was an alcoholic college professor but a non-wife beater. So there is a plentiful non-white female market here for white Betas, considering the competition.

    Replies: @BB753

    Well, I’d rather marry a straight Mexican or Asian woman than an ugly white lesbian. Maybe Cohen thought marrying any shiksa, even a lesbian one, was better than celibacy or marrying a Jewish woman.

    • Replies: @SFG
    @BB753

    I think somebody said here there was sort of a hierarchy with white guys marrying ethnic women, the rich and UMC guys married Asians, the middle class married Hispanics, the lower class married blacks.

    Replies: @Twinkie

    , @R.G. Camara
    @BB753


    Maybe Cohen thought marrying any shiksa, even a lesbian one, was better than celibacy or marrying a Jewish woman.
     
    He didn't want his kids to be inbred anymore, so married out.
  131. @Guest007
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    One should probably provide a cite on the top three 400 meter runners and when.

    Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic

    Correction. 800M.

    • Replies: @Guest007
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    Not three men:

    Not a picture from when Caster Semenya won gold at the World Championships.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_World_Championships_in_Athletics_%E2%80%93_Women%27s_800_metres

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caster_Semenya

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janeth_Jepkosgei

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jenny_Meadows

    I might have the wrong race bud I could not find another world championship for Semenya.

    Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic

  132. @Jack D
    @Bill P

    Generally speaking, especially in the past, laws against sex (gay or straight) with teens who are close to (but slightly under) the age of consent are only rarely enforced (or else our prisons would be full) and usually only when it involves someone in a position of authority or is connected with some other incident.

    Right now there is a case involving Don Henley of the Eagles and (in order to discredit his character - I really don't understand why the judge allowed this because it is so irrelevant to the case at hand) he is being cross examined about a 16-year-old prostitute who overdosed at his home in 1980 (at the time he was given probation and a $2,500 fine). And the only reason this came to the attention of the authorities at all was because she overdosed.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13131833/The-Eagles-Don-Henley-court-prostitute-overdose.html

    Replies: @deep anonymous

    “Right now there is a case involving Don Henley of the Eagles and (in order to discredit his character – I really don’t understand why the judge allowed this because it is so irrelevant to the case at hand) he is being cross examined about a 16-year-old prostitute who overdosed at his home in 1980 (at the time he was given probation and a $2,500 fine).”

    I think the trend has been to relax Rule 404(b) in rape/sexual assault cases. In Maryland, for instance, a statute was enacted doing exactly that because the General Assembly was unhappy with a Court of Appeals decision reversing a rapist’s conviction for that reason.

    (For the non-lawyers, Rule 404(b) is the evidentiary rule restricting the admissibility of propensity evidence. In a criminal trial, the defendant’s guilt of prior or non-charged conduct is presumptively out of bounds except for supposedly narrow exceptions, turning on things like motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, absence of mistake, or lack of accident. MIMIC Rule)

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @deep anonymous

    The case at hand is a state criminal prosecution of 3rd parties who (allegedly) stole and sold song manuscripts belonging to Henley. Henley's propensity to have sex with underage whores (she LOOKED like she was over 18!) has zippo to do with the case at hand. Completely irrelevant. The defense counsel just wants to make Henley unsympathetic to the jury. I really don't know why the judge allowed it. There are some really crap judges out there. As our society has declined so too has the quality of some judges.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @deep anonymous

  133. @AndrewR
    @YetAnotherAnon

    Macron openly fantasizes about using NATO troops in Ukraine. A general strike in all NATO countries is necessary.

    Replies: @tyrone

    Macron openly fantasizes about using NATO troops in Ukraine

    Right, FAFO, of course one has to wonder who is operating the patriot missiles and HMARS right now.

  134. @MEH 0910
    https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/14/us/fertility-fraud-accidental-incest-invs/index.html

    ‘I slept with my half-sibling’: Woman’s horror story reflects loosely regulated nature of US fertility industry
     

    (CNN) - Victoria Hill never quite understood how she could be so different from her father – in looks and in temperament. The 39-year-old licensed clinical social worker from suburban Connecticut used to joke that perhaps she was the mailman’s child.

    Her joke eventually became no laughing matter. Worried about a health issue, and puzzled because neither of her parents had suffered any of the symptoms, Hill purchased a DNA testing kit from 23andMe a few years ago and sent her DNA to the genomics company.

    What should have been a routine quest to learn more about herself turned into a shocking revelation that she had many more siblings than just the brother she grew up with – the count now stands at 22. Some of them reached out to her and dropped more bombshells: Hill’s biological father was not the man she grew up with but a fertility doctor who had been helping her mother conceive using donated sperm. That doctor, Burton Caldwell, a sibling told her, had used his own sperm to inseminate her mother, allegedly without her consent.

    But the most devastating revelation came this summer, when Hill found out that one of her newly discovered siblings had been her high school boyfriend – one she says she easily could have married.

    “I was traumatized by this,” Hill told CNN in an exclusive interview. “Now I’m looking at pictures of people thinking, well, if he could be my sibling, anybody could be my sibling.”

    Hill’s story appears to represent one of the most extreme cases to date of fertility fraud in which fertility doctors have misled their female patients and their families by secretly using their own sperm instead of that of a donor. It also illustrates how the huge groups of siblings made possible in part by a lack of regulation can lead to a worst-case scenario coming to pass: accidental incest.
     
    Fertility nightmare | Woman learns doctor used own sperm for inseminations, is her biological dad
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3h5YfFMFjzc
    Feb 15, 2024

    Video via CNN Newsource & Reporter Kyung Lah.

    A woman discovered a fertility doctor used his own sperm in inseminations, resulting in her having numerous siblings -- including a boy she dated in high school. The horror story reflects the loosely regulated nature of the U.S. fertility industry.
     

    Replies: @Ralph L

    That was a (ripped from the headlines) Law & Order episode back in the 90s.

  135. More food and sexual neuroticism, less humanity.

    The same individual geese on which we conducted these experiments, first aroused my interest in the process of domestication. They were F1 hybrids of wild Greylags and domestic geese and they showed surprising deviations from the normal social and sexual behaviour of the wild birds. I realised that an overpowering increase in the drives of feeding as well as of copulation and a waning of more differentiated social instincts is characteristic of very many domestic animals. I was frightened – as I still am – by the thought that analogous genetical processes of deterioration may be at work with civilized humanity.

    Konrad Lorenz

    • Replies: @Anon
    @TelfoedJohn


    analogous genetical processes of deterioration may be at work with civilized humanity.

     

    Increased drive to feed and copulate, check. Also, just like geese, street shitting.
  136. @SFG
    @MEH 0910

    I can't figure out whether to envy or pity Mr. Coen (is she forcing him to look on while she sleeps around? are they enjoying four-person orgies?), but I'm definitely thinking: don't try this at home.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Barnard, @Reg Cæsar

    I don’t pity him at all, this is an intentional choice. I do have to wonder who is supposed to be the audience for a movie like this. Is a movie like this made with the understanding that it is just the cost of showing you support the regime? There is no way it could ever make money.

  137. “What’s next? Many on the right argued that it had to be pedophilia”

    there’s a lot more movement in this direction from leftists than for polygamy. so yeah, i’d say that’s one of their priorities.

    for now i’m not gonna rehash the deep dive math argument i’ve posted several times for why leftist thought leaders have considered, but nixed, a push for polygamy. the calculus has changed though with an open border.

    with a (mostly) closed border, polygamy math says that it helps Republicans more. so they didn’t go for it. with an open border, and likely a permanently open border, polygamy math might make sense for Democrat politics. they can bring in a few million Democrat voting third world polygamists who will cancel out, then overwhelm, Republican voting American polygamists.

  138. @ben tillman
    @Jack D


    Not just the girls. I have in my career come across several instances where men had two complete families in different cities. They (especially family #1 – the wife to which he is legally married, sometimes the other one knows) only found out about each other only after the man dies. This leads to lawsuits quite often. I am talking about successful white men, not ghetto baby daddies. Lindbergh being a famous example.
     
    Like H.L. Hunt and his three families.

    Christianity is unusual for requiring monogamy. This was not true of Judaism or of Islam or many Eastern religions. It appears that they inherited this from the Romans. Christianity was a Middle Eastern religion that was taken up by Greeks and Romans and so it has aspects of both cultures. For example they also followed the food customs of the Romans and not the Jews. It may be that certain aspects of culture are deeper than any new religion so that the new religion yields to the deeper practice.
     
    See:

    The Germanization of Early Medieval Christianity: A Sociohistorical Approach to Religious Transformation

    --James C. Russell

    Replies: @Jack D

    You end up with all sorts of weird hybrids. If I say that today is Wednesday ([W]Odin’s day), February 28, 2024 then the day of the week is Norse (Germanic) , the month is Roman and the year is referenced to Christianity but is written in Arabic numbers.

    Odin stands in for Mercury (or vice versa) just as the Virgin Mary stand in for the Corn Maiden in the US SW and San Lázaro stands in for Babalú Ayé in Santeria. This way when the invaders show up you can keep worshipping your old gods, you just call them by new names.

    As for German influence, of course the entire Protestant movement can be seen a result of the uneasy fit between Catholic (Greco-Roman) and Germanic thinking and character.

    • Agree: The Anti-Gnostic
  139. @The Anti-Gnostic
    @Guest007

    Correction. 800M.

    https://i.imgur.com/7umGfQs.jpg

    Replies: @Guest007

    Not three men:

    Not a picture from when Caster Semenya won gold at the World Championships.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_World_Championships_in_Athletics_%E2%80%93_Women%27s_800_metres

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caster_Semenya

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janeth_Jepkosgei

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jenny_Meadows

    I might have the wrong race bud I could not find another world championship for Semenya.

    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
    @Guest007

    You really are tripping over mouse poop.

    Replies: @Guest007

  140. Come to think of it, I think it most plausible that the next current thing will be socially and legally enforced veganism. Trendiness, social pressure, city bans, state initiative petitions. Easier to cut off supply than punish demand. Brought to us by pretty much the same people who have imposed the recent Things.

    Fun facts: sea sponges, dust mites, and protozoa are animals. Some personal hygiene measures would need to be outlawed too.

    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    @New Dealer

    Veganism would go well with the current "animals burp methane and their effluent pollutes waterways" stuff, which is presumably aimed at putting the peasants back in their rightful place.

    So that's a pretty neat prediction.

    Maybe our one or two grandchildren (if we're lucky) will listen to our tales of eating meat every day the way our children listen to tales of buying our houses aged 24.

    , @Jack D
    @New Dealer

    An interesting speculation (and one that for once does not center around sexual perversion) but one that I think is not going to happen for a number of economic and technological reasons (as well as many people's unwillingness to fundamentally change their diet - you could get HALF the population to go along with this and the other half are going to say NFW, along the predictable red/blue lines).

    A year or two ago it looked like things were headed in this direction but the bubble has largely collapsed (a similar bubble collapse is happening with self driving cars and with electric cars). You can get out ahead of consumer sentiment (and technology) a little bit but not a lot. If you get too far ahead of the gang, when you look over your shoulder you will realize that you are out there all by yourself and you have left the crowd behind.

    , @TWS
    @New Dealer

    Plenty of fish in the creeks and deer in the fields.

    , @Emil Nikola Richard
    @New Dealer

    String instrument strings and drum heads are made from animals. Also you must quit listening to music.

    Replies: @Anonymous

  141. 125 comments and nobody’s mentioned abortion. That’s a far bigger deal than polyamory right now.

  142. @Muggles
    @YetAnotherAnon

    Has this Estonian babe politician ever hoisted a rifle?

    Talked to anyone with actual combat experience?

    Tallied the number of heroic female Ukrainian combat soldiers facing death?

    (That tally is probably in the low double digits).

    Like war loving neocons everywhere, bleating for "victory" is best done in warm safe surroundings secure in the knowledge that you and yours are not going to be at risk.

    Ukraine is a crazy event. In 30 years everyone will wonder why this happened. Like the 1850s Crimean War.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Jack D

    Of course most people don’t know the Crimean War from a hole in the ground and probably 30 years from now the same will be true of Ukraine, but for those who do know, there are a lot of parallels.

    You have an aggressive expansionist Russia opportunistically trying to take advantage of what it perceives as a weaker neighbor (the Ottoman Empire) under trumped up (similar) grounds – allegedly the protection of Orthodox Christians living in the neighbor’s country. Fearing the growth of influence of the Russian Empire, the British and French (and later the Italians) intervene on the side of the weaker neighbor.

    Let’s hope that the aftermath follows similar lines as well (from the Wiki):

    The Crimean War marked a turning point for the Russian Empire. The war weakened the Imperial Russian Army, drained the treasury and undermined Russia’s influence in Europe. The empire would take decades to recover. Russia’s humiliation forced its educated elites to identify its problems and recognise the need for fundamental reforms. They saw rapid modernisation as the sole way to recover the empire’s status as a European power. The war thus became a catalyst for reforms of Russia’s social institutions, including the abolition of serfdom and overhauls in the justice system, local self-government, education and military service.

    • LOL: YetAnotherAnon
    • Replies: @Hypnotoad666
    @Jack D


    Let’s hope that the aftermath follows similar lines as well (from the Wiki)
     
    The West spent a lot of blood and treasure to help prop up the Ottoman Empire. Yeah, that sounds like another winner for Democracy and Western values. But at least they got to "harm" Russia, by making them spend blood and treasure, also. I guess I can see the parallels now that you mention it.

    Irrational and emotional hatred of any country or people is not a sound basis for foreign policy. But the morons that run our foreign policy are motivated by irrational hatred of Russia and irrational love of Israel. It's pathetic.

    Replies: @Jack D, @Twinkie

    , @Bardon Kaldian
    @Jack D

    I would recommend to all non-idiots to read columns & watch Dan Schueftan videos:

    https://www.israelhayom.com/writer/dan-schueftan/page/2/

    For instance: https://www.israelhayom.com/opinions/ukraine-invasion-is-putins-gift-to-the-western-world/

    https://www.israelhayom.com/opinions/is-ukraine-headed-for-a-rude-awakening/

    https://www.israelhayom.com/opinions/crying-racism-while-denying-reality/

    To sum it:

    * Americans are force for the good, but they are frequently disastrous in their parochialism & "operational mind". Strategic mind is dealing with situations where there are no solutions. See under Eisenhower 1956 & Nasser, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan,..

    * Israel is the only developed country where non-zombified secular women want children

    * gifted peoples ruled by barbarians are the real danger (Germany, now Iran)

    * the only Middle Eastern gifted peoples are Israelis and Iranians

    * nationalism is good & the bad thing is extreme nationalism, so post-1945 fight against nationalism in the Western world was a grave mistake

    * the Western world is the pinnacle of everything, but you cannot force its values on the rest

    * with Arabs- better enlightened absolutism than democracy leading to Islamism

    * anti-waxxers should be isolated from the normal world

    * Harvard professors live in la-la-land, similar to most American foreign policy makers

    * Obama and Carter were suckers & Nixon was the man

    * Palestinians are incurable

    * Israelis tend to fall asleep politically every 10 or 20 years

    * Putin already lost the war


    Also, two videos from 1 year & 2 months ago (hosts are annoying with their interruptions)


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIDB_lY23Hs

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xl9vLBDTJkg

    Replies: @Muggles

  143. I have no specific Next Thing predictions, only a screening criteria you might consider: Will it work as a “very special” made-for-TV movie, and then as a popular sitcom?

  144. @Almost Missouri
    @Twinkie


    World War P, huh?
     
    But not the Pedo- P . . . yet.

    The advantage for the Left in Poly-amory/gamy/andry/whatevery is that it allows them to lasso together a bunch of otherwise mutually hostile groups in their Coalition of Fringes.

    Pederasty, Bestiality, and other such abominations do naturally appeal to the Left, and are still on their list for future normalization ("Minor Attracted Person" and "Zoophilia"—the euphemisms are ready and waiting), but neither offers the immediate political advantage of uniting white betaboy polyamorists with "proud African Muslim polygamists" with lesbian serial predators with empowered wahmen with whatever other polymorphous perversity is out there.

    Steve observes that these natural aversions could be a "sticking point", but that is the whole purpose of Coalition-(of the Fringes)-building, or as Obama's handlers called it, Community Organizing: you get the higher-IQ leaders of the various mutually antagonistic groups to overlook their immediate antagonism and to focus their animosity instead on the Real Enemy: heritage America, i.e., you.

    If you want to see an easily visible instance of this in action, watch Friend-Of-Barack Henry Louis Gates's Finding Your Roots TV show. The guests are selected for having some kind of Dem Coalition-of-the-Fringes marker: homosexual, colored, Jewish, children of immigrants, whatever. Then at some point in the show, typically when the guest is emotionally vulnerable from the revelation of an ancestor's hardship, Gates will close in and elicit a pledge of allegiance to the Woke World Order: "I'll never forget how my people were mistreated just as others are being mistreated right now!", "I'll never again question the lived experience of a migrant!", etc., etc. Such often tearful oaths are extracted by the host, recorded by the cameras, and then broadcast to the world with state (i.e. your) subsidy.

    World War P and the Coalition of the Fringes will be making beautiful music together.


    My guess is that some form of polygamy will instead be next, with computer nerds who lack the gene for sexual jealousy demanding “polyamory” and NGOs servicing African refugees insisting that Mr. Nguma and all four Ms. Ngumas and their nineteen children be let in because “love is love,” and if you don’t approve of polygamy you’re racist.
     
    Indeed, it's like a clown world Marvel Justice League Meme All Star Team-Up!

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease

    Hi, I’m a Leftist. I like living in a house, and I like bricks, but I don’t like mortar or cement.

    So my choices are: live in a big loose pile of bricks, or go and squat in somebody else’s house.

    Either one is fine, so long as it makes white people miserable

  145. @Art Deco
    I think the next goal of the gay lobby will be to persuade prosecutors to stop bringing charges against homosexual men who seduce adolescent males. That's not really what you mean by 'the new current thing'. The 'transgender' craze is helpful to the gay lobby because it legitimates perversion generally and because social workers, lawyers, and mental health types have been demonstrably willing to strip parents of their authority over their children to advance the interests of deviants.

    Replies: @Bill P, @Reg Cæsar

    …because social workers, lawyers, and mental health types have been demonstrably willing to strip parents of their authority over their children to advance the interests of deviants.

    And themselves.

    The one great principle of the English law is to make business for itself. There is no other principle distinctly, certainly, and consistently maintained through all its narrow turnings. Viewed by this light it becomes a coherent scheme and not the monstrous maze the laity are apt to think it. Let them but once clearly perceive that its grand principle is to make business for itself at their expense and surely they will cease to grumble.”

    –Dickens, Bleak House

    • Thanks: kaganovitch
  146. @Carol
    Oh, Steve. The 25-year-old men are just as likely to be grossed out that a woman hid age would go with an elderly competitor.

    Like, sure he's got more money but can he even get it up anymore? She must have Daddy Issues, man.

    Replies: @Truth

    Like, sure he’s got more money but can he even get it up anymore?

    At 40?

  147. Polyamory: 2025
    Pederasty: 2027
    Bestiality: 2029

    There, I’ve laid out the rest of your Next Big Thing decade for you.

  148. @New Dealer
    Come to think of it, I think it most plausible that the next current thing will be socially and legally enforced veganism. Trendiness, social pressure, city bans, state initiative petitions. Easier to cut off supply than punish demand. Brought to us by pretty much the same people who have imposed the recent Things.

    https://cloudfront-eu-central-1.images.arcpublishing.com/irishtimes/7MA4AEULQC5VNNQZ7HHCDK62Q4.jpg

    https://plantbasednews.org/app/uploads/2023/09/plant-based-news-vegan-billboard-ww2.jpg

    https://stories.isu.pub/98111896/images/64_original_file_I0.jpg

    Fun facts: sea sponges, dust mites, and protozoa are animals. Some personal hygiene measures would need to be outlawed too.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Jack D, @TWS, @Emil Nikola Richard

    Veganism would go well with the current “animals burp methane and their effluent pollutes waterways” stuff, which is presumably aimed at putting the peasants back in their rightful place.

    So that’s a pretty neat prediction.

    Maybe our one or two grandchildren (if we’re lucky) will listen to our tales of eating meat every day the way our children listen to tales of buying our houses aged 24.

  149. @Joe Stalin
    I've noticed the femail-centric Daily Mail seems to be pushing the Ultra-Processed-Food trope as being what could be ailing you.

    Replies: @Muggles

    Agree, that is now being pushed by Those Who Know More About Your Health Than You Do.

    Not sure if there is some published schedule for these Mantras From On High or not, or we just see or read them as they roll them out.

    In this case, as sometimes is the case, there is merit to the idea, though as usual, very vague as to details.

    What is “Ultra Processed” as opposed to just processed for shelf life or taste?

    Now some of that is just junk food with a lot of added sugar (carbs) or fats. Also easy to prepare and store for long periods. Or added salt and flavors. Because humans like that.

    Like most of these food fads, promoted by health Nazis (who push things you don’t like or won’t eat) there is some merit and a lot of generalities. “Pure food” is often superior but with long supply chains, not practical or cheap enough for most people to afford. Raw foods are slow to cook and often hard to prepare. Turnips anyone?

    I’m sure that the upcoming Soros-Gates Insect Paste will qualify, once it is demanded by the Save the Planet Crowd for our own good. That will require some “ultra processing” but by then, that fad will be old hat.

    Of course killing natural insects to eat will engender “danger! danger!” cries as they often pollinate plants and aerate the soil, and provide food for other animals. So the Soros-Gates V. 2.0 Paste will be made from DNA modified lab grown insects, not real ones.

    And Soylent Green will be eco friendly too. A Wuhan-Fauci Product! You Can Recycle YOU!

    “Made Of, By and For People Just Like You!”

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Muggles

    The "natural foods/anti-Ultra processed" gang and the "vegan" gang are not the same gang. Vegans are most concerned with animal cruelty. The meat substitutes such as Impossible Burger are HIGHLY ultra-processed. They sound like something from a chemistry lab:

    Plant Protein (21%) (Soy), Coconut Oil, Thickener (INS 461), Glutamic Acid, Cultured Dextrose, Modified Starch, Yeast Extract, Soy Leghemoglobin (genetically modified), Antioxidant (INS 307b), Vitamins and Minerals (Zinc Gluconate, Niacin (Vitamin B3), Thiamine ...

    Real meat OTOH is the polar opposite. The only ingredient in a package of hamburger is meat. One ingredient - ground up cow.

    No one has been able to perfect it and produce it at a reasonable cost, but lab grown meat really seemed to offer the perfect alternative. If you are going to culture cells in a lab, there's no need to culture DNA modified insect cells. You can culture the cells of a plain old genetically unmodified cow. Take one little biopsy of Bessie in the field and reproduce it a billion times. This had the potential to unite the vegan crowd (no need to kill animals) and the all natural crowd (one ingredient - meat) and the I want my meat crowd (it's just cow meat grown in a new way). But no one has been able to economically scale this up to a mass production level.

    Replies: @J.Ross

  150. @MEH 0910
    https://www.moviemaker.com/drive-away-dolls-ethan-coen-tricia-cooke/

    Drive-Away Dolls: How Ethan Coen and Tricia Cooke’s Long Marriage Shaped Their Lesbian Road-Trip Movie
     

    [...]
    I let Ethan and Joel know that I really wanted to work as an editor, and asked if they had any positions available in New York as an apprentice,” says Cooke. “Apparently they already had an apprentice, but they made room for me too, so that was kind.”

    Cooke hit it off with Ethan Coen almost immediately. But they wanted different things.

    “Ethan asked me on a date and we went to see Drugstore Cowboy,” she says. “I told him, ‘I’m a lesbian, I’m not interested.’”

    So they became friends for a while. But the relationship evolved. They married in 1993, and had two kids.

    They also made amazing films together: Cooke, now very much a fan of the Coens’ work, was the assistant editor of their 1991 film Barton Fink and 1994 follow-up The Hudsucker Proxy. And Cooke became the editor of their 1998 The Big Lebowski, 2000’s O Brother, Where Art Thou?, and 2001’s The Man Who Wasn’t There. She edited the latter with the brothers, who used their editing pseudonym, Roderick Jaynes.

    So they became friends for a while. But the relationship evolved. They married in 1993, and had two kids.

    But sometime after that, Joel and Ethan Coen started using Final Cut to edit. And Cooke came to a personal decision involving her kids.

    “As they got a little older, I realized they were going to grow up and I wasn’t going to be able to spend any time with them if I was in the cutting room 10 to 12 hours a day, which is often the case,” says Cooke. “So I decided to slow down and start writing more.”

    She co-directed a documentary with her friend Jennifer Arnold called Where the Girls Are, a comedic short about the history, parties and conflicts of the Dinah Shore Weekend, a giant lesbian pool party in Palm Springs. It won the Outstanding Narrative Short Film at Outfest in 2003.

    She also co-directed the 2008 short “Don’t Mess With Texas” with Carrie Schrader. Cooke co-wrote the film, about two young lesbians who run into trouble at a diner, with Coen.

    “Being married to Ethan and being queer there’s always a little disconnect sometimes,” she laughs. “I wanted to be able to make queer films as well.”

    Coen and Cooke decided in the aughts that they should write a feature screenplay, which they originally called Drive-Away Dykes.

    “We wrote Drive-Away Dykes together many, many years ago as a way for us to spend time together,” says Cooke.

    By then, the couple were no longer in a traditional partnership.

    “We have a very non-traditional marriage and relationship where there’s a bigger unit,” says Cooke. “I have a partner and Ethan has another partner.”

    She adds: “It’s not easy sometimes and it can be very difficult for even our friends and family to understand. You navigate it one day at a time. We’ve been in this kind of dynamic for over 20 years, and we still take it one day at a time.”

    “It’s funny because our whole relationship is like, “What, me worry?” says Coen, quoting Mad Magazine poster boy Alfred E. Newman. “And that’s also the movie.”

    So that’s the backstory of Drive-Away Dolls. Or Drive-Away Dykes. Whichever you prefer.
     

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drive-Away_Dolls

    https://screenrant.com/drive-away-dolls-movie-box-office-opening-weekend/


    Ethan Coen's New Movie Has Disastrous Box Office Opening, Misses Top 5 In First Weekend
    The new Ethan Coen movie Drive-Away Dolls barely makes it into the Top 10 in its domestic opening weekend, landing at No. 8 with a paltry debut.
     
    https://www.slashfilm.com/1526800/ethan-coen-drive-away-dolls-box-office-disappointment/

    Ethan Coen's Drive-Away Dolls Is A Big Box Office Disappointment
     
    DRIVE-AWAY DOLLS - Official Trailer [HD] - Only In Theaters February 23
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oy0RYiQRWUk
    Jun 23, 2023

    Written by Ethan Coen and Tricia Cooke, this comedy caper follows Jamie, an uninhibited free spirit bemoaning yet another breakup with a girlfriend, and her demure friend Marian who desperately needs to loosen up. In search of a fresh start, the two embark on an impromptu road trip to Tallahassee, but things quickly go awry when they cross paths with a group of inept criminals along the way. Directed by Ethan Coen.
     
    DRIVE-AWAY DOLLS - Official Trailer 2 [HD] - Only In Theaters February 23
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vy_7UGICJU
    Feb 6, 2024

    Replies: @Redneck Farmer, @BB753, @SFG, @Muggles, @anonymous, @AnotherDad

    Have the Coen brothers split-up professionally ?

    • Replies: @MEH 0910
    @anonymous

    https://www.fangoria.com/original/the-coen-brothers-reportedly-making-a-very-bloody-horror-movie/


    The Coen Brothers Reportedly Making A Very Bloody Horror Movie
    Joel and Ethan Coen have been working separately for several years but horror is bringing them back together.
    BY RYAN SCOTT · JANUARY 29, 2024
     

    The Coen Brothers have not directed a film together since 2018’s The Ballad of Buster Scruggs for Netflix. Since then, the legendary duo of Joel and Ethan have been making films separately. But fear not! The brothers are soon going to reunite behind the camera and, what’s more, it’s a horror movie that will be getting them back together. Details are currently slim, but the news comes directly from Ethan Coen.

    As reported by World of Reel, Ethan Coen and his Drive Away Dolls collaborator/co-writer Tricia Cooke recently held a Master Class conversation put on by the Tromso International Film Festival in Norway. During that conversation, Ethan confirmed that he and Joel have written a new script together, and they apparently intend to direct it in the near future. Here’s what he had to say about it:

    “It's a pure horror film, and it gets very bloody. If you like Blood Simple, I think you'll enjoy it.”
     
    [...]
    As for what the movie might be about? That, for now, remains wholly mysterious. Though Cooke did say that the script is “horribly funny.” So a dark, bloody horror/comedy directed by the Coen Brothers? That sounds pretty enticing. The only downside is that both Joel and Ethan Coen may have other projects to wrap up first before they can truly get this one off the ground.

    The report notes that Joel might have to finish another project first, but that project was not named. Joel most recently directed 2021’s The Tragedy of MacBeth. Ethan, meanwhile, has Drive Away Dolls coming out later this year, and he is also attached to direct a comedy titled Honey Don’t! that appears to be coming together quickly. So, worst-case scenario, this mysterious horror film would have to wait until those projects are in the books. Stay tuned as we’ll surely be learning more sooner rather than later.
     

    Replies: @anonymous

  151. An extreme version of “animal rights”-and non-judgmentalism or even celebration regarding bestiality- seems likely.

    Regarding bestiality and polygamy in the broader setting of the politics of tolerance and bigotry, see PTT:

    One moves swiftly and imperceptibly from a world in which you’re a bigot if you compare gay marriage to something as unsavory as polygamy to a world in which you’re a bigot for suggesting that there is something wrong with polygamy.

    The following conversation actually took place. I’m going to capriciously refer to the interlocutor as Kai, no relation.

    Me: If you accept a marriage between two men, you must also accept a marriage between a man and —
    Kai, interrupting: A goat!
    Me: I was actually going to say “multiple women”. But since you bring it up, what are your arguments against a man marrying a goat?
    Kai, taken aback but only very slightly: Hmm, it’s just not a very common issue right now. If and when it becomes relevant we can discuss it. In principle, ruling out animal cruelty, I have no objection.

    Actually, Kai’s jiu-jitsu is several levels above a plain vanilla Caldwellian pivot. In the course of a single conversation, I managed to become a bigot twice: first, for having the offensive gay-marriage/bestiality suggestion forcibly imposed on me, and second for suggesting that there is anything wrong with the latter!

  152. Anonymous[101] • Disclaimer says:
    @puttheforkdown
    @SFG

    Scott Alexander is the most Jewish guy. He's an early 20th century Viennese degenerate semite on steroids. An unrepentant materialist atheist, transhumanist glorified government drug dealer (read: psychiatrist) who passionately argues for women being promiscuous and for men to be happy cucks while being asexual himself. After all, the worst case scenario for polyamory is a child being abused, and that happens sometimes in monogamous marriages, so...eh, right?

    Just recently he gave out one of his grants worth tens of thousands of dollars to a trans person arguing for giving children more rights so that they can pursue underage transitioning regardless of the parents wishes.

    The lightness of his skin is irrelevant. Dude is a piece of shit and his articles have never had meaningful positive real world impact - their sole masturbatory value is in showing off his classically Jewish verbal IQ tilt while making the reader feel special for following along. I hope he disappears.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Anonymous

    An unrepentant materialist atheist

    Atheism is just the correct intellectual position. People don’t rise from the dead.

    Just recently he gave out one of his grants worth tens of thousands of dollars to a trans person arguing for giving children more rights so that they can pursue underage transitioning regardless of the parents wishes.

    I wish he didn’t do that. The fact that you know about it shows you read him or at least keep track of news in the community, so you must find *something* interesting in him/them. The fundamental fact is that people like him run the country, not clowns like Majorie Taylor Greene. He suffered a lot of social and professional sanction for condemning feminism, calling him names because he won’t go full skinhead is unwise. Even Nick Fuentes gets it now:

  153. @New Dealer
    Come to think of it, I think it most plausible that the next current thing will be socially and legally enforced veganism. Trendiness, social pressure, city bans, state initiative petitions. Easier to cut off supply than punish demand. Brought to us by pretty much the same people who have imposed the recent Things.

    https://cloudfront-eu-central-1.images.arcpublishing.com/irishtimes/7MA4AEULQC5VNNQZ7HHCDK62Q4.jpg

    https://plantbasednews.org/app/uploads/2023/09/plant-based-news-vegan-billboard-ww2.jpg

    https://stories.isu.pub/98111896/images/64_original_file_I0.jpg

    Fun facts: sea sponges, dust mites, and protozoa are animals. Some personal hygiene measures would need to be outlawed too.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Jack D, @TWS, @Emil Nikola Richard

    An interesting speculation (and one that for once does not center around sexual perversion) but one that I think is not going to happen for a number of economic and technological reasons (as well as many people’s unwillingness to fundamentally change their diet – you could get HALF the population to go along with this and the other half are going to say NFW, along the predictable red/blue lines).

    A year or two ago it looked like things were headed in this direction but the bubble has largely collapsed (a similar bubble collapse is happening with self driving cars and with electric cars). You can get out ahead of consumer sentiment (and technology) a little bit but not a lot. If you get too far ahead of the gang, when you look over your shoulder you will realize that you are out there all by yourself and you have left the crowd behind.

    • Thanks: Inquiring Mind
  154. Anonymous[448] • Disclaimer says:
    @puttheforkdown
    @SFG

    Scott Alexander is the most Jewish guy. He's an early 20th century Viennese degenerate semite on steroids. An unrepentant materialist atheist, transhumanist glorified government drug dealer (read: psychiatrist) who passionately argues for women being promiscuous and for men to be happy cucks while being asexual himself. After all, the worst case scenario for polyamory is a child being abused, and that happens sometimes in monogamous marriages, so...eh, right?

    Just recently he gave out one of his grants worth tens of thousands of dollars to a trans person arguing for giving children more rights so that they can pursue underage transitioning regardless of the parents wishes.

    The lightness of his skin is irrelevant. Dude is a piece of shit and his articles have never had meaningful positive real world impact - their sole masturbatory value is in showing off his classically Jewish verbal IQ tilt while making the reader feel special for following along. I hope he disappears.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Anonymous

    An unrepentant materialist atheist

    Atheism is just the correct intellectual position. People don’t rise from the dead.

    Just recently he gave out one of his grants worth tens of thousands of dollars to a trans person arguing for giving children more rights so that they can pursue underage transitioning regardless of the parents wishes.

    I wish he didn’t do that. The fact that you know about it shows you read him or at least keep track of news in the community, so you must find *something* interesting there. The fundamental fact is that people like him run the country, not clowns like Majorie Taylor Greene. He suffered a lot of social and professional sanction for condemning feminism, calling him names because he won’t go full skinhead is unwise. Even Nick Fuentes gets it now:

    • Replies: @SFG
    @Anonymous

    The thing about SA is he’s an off-ramp for liberalism. Lots of people who will never read Sailer or watch Tucker but are uncomfortable with wokery will read a Berkeley psychiatrist’s blog, and start drifting right. Everyone likes to quote Schmitt on the friend-enemy distinction but outside of a war politics is more about making unaffiliated people drift into your camp; do you think most Trump voters were dissident-right?

    Also a lot of Silicon Valley people read the blog, I have the impression.

  155. @songbird
    In 1917, Church canon law raised the age of the bride to 14, while the groom had to be 16.

    I guess marriages that early were quite uncommon in many parts of Europe, But I still find it a remarkable transformation of views, how many men now claim that any attraction to a girl even slightly under 18 is pedophilia.

    Replies: @Muggles

    Prior to effective modern birth control (circa 1960) there were a lot of “underage” girls who became pregnant, usually by older males.

    Still common in Third World places and in poorer, mainly non White communities elsewhere.

    Prior to birth control, most of these births were farmed out to orphanages or adopted by relatives. Or the young couple got married, whatever the local custom allowed.

    One suspects that in Paleo and ancient times, most of our ancestors were born “under age of consent” since biology and sex drives start pretty early. One reason why “the patriarchy” was the predominant form of family organization.

    Young females were locked up by family members and older females in clan arrangements to keep from being impregnated. Also, as a consequence, could be bartered as “brides” to outsiders for goods, livestock, cash or clan affiliate benefits. Still a common practice in places like Muslim or African, Indian societies.

    Of course when average lifespans were under 40, this was not only common but probably necessary.

    Those fairy tale “princess brides” and literary ones like Juliet were often “under age” by modern standards. Mortality by childbirth also very high. A different world.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Muggles

    In premodern times it was not uncommon for a child to find out later in life that their "mother" was really their grandmother and their "sister" or their "aunt" was actually their mother. Aside from adoption, this was one way of dealing with teen pregnancies.

    The combination ploy was Loretta Young who became pregnant by Clark Gable. She then disappeared for a few months during her pregnancy and when she reemerged it was announced that she had "adopted" a baby (she adopted her own baby). Apparently the child bore a striking resemblance to her father (without the mustache) and everyone in Hollywood knew what was up, except for the poor child herself who did not find out until she was a newlywed and her husband explained to her why she was the spitting image of Clark Gable in a dress.

    https://waytofamous.com/images/judy-lewis-03.jpg

    , @Reg Cæsar
    @Muggles


    Of course when average lifespans were under 40, this was not only common but probably necessary.
     
    Yes, epidemics would take out people of parenting age, but most of the average-lifespan difference between then and now is a result of conditions in infancy and early childhood. A least since the onset of civilization. Results may vary for nomadic and hunter-gatherer societies.


    There were plenty of grandparents around.
  156. @New Dealer
    @AnotherDad

    Yes, polyamory would be terrible for children.

    There is another huge drawback. In a normal household of man, woman, couple of kids, you can never find a damned thing. Somebody didn't put the can opener back, you find it a few days later under the sink. Or one of the grownups decides to reorganize the kitchen cupboards again. You find your razor in the toilet tank and your shaving cream in the backyard. Your best sweater is missing for some reason. Your socket set is no longer with your tools, but somehow ended up with the pots and pans.

    All that would be exponentially worse in a polyamorous household.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Muggles, @DenverGregg, @hhsiii, @Colin Wright

    All that would be exponentially worse in a polyamorous household.

    And there is the well known fact that women all get along very well when living together in close quarters.

    Daughters love moms, sisters love sisters. grandma loves all her girls, and those sharing the same guys enjoy the sweet benefits of female solidarity.

    What can go wrong?

  157. @Muggles
    @Joe Stalin

    Agree, that is now being pushed by Those Who Know More About Your Health Than You Do.

    Not sure if there is some published schedule for these Mantras From On High or not, or we just see or read them as they roll them out.

    In this case, as sometimes is the case, there is merit to the idea, though as usual, very vague as to details.

    What is "Ultra Processed" as opposed to just processed for shelf life or taste?

    Now some of that is just junk food with a lot of added sugar (carbs) or fats. Also easy to prepare and store for long periods. Or added salt and flavors. Because humans like that.

    Like most of these food fads, promoted by health Nazis (who push things you don't like or won't eat) there is some merit and a lot of generalities. "Pure food" is often superior but with long supply chains, not practical or cheap enough for most people to afford. Raw foods are slow to cook and often hard to prepare. Turnips anyone?

    I'm sure that the upcoming Soros-Gates Insect Paste will qualify, once it is demanded by the Save the Planet Crowd for our own good. That will require some "ultra processing" but by then, that fad will be old hat.

    Of course killing natural insects to eat will engender "danger! danger!" cries as they often pollinate plants and aerate the soil, and provide food for other animals. So the Soros-Gates V. 2.0 Paste will be made from DNA modified lab grown insects, not real ones.

    And Soylent Green will be eco friendly too. A Wuhan-Fauci Product! You Can Recycle YOU!

    "Made Of, By and For People Just Like You!"

    Replies: @Jack D

    The “natural foods/anti-Ultra processed” gang and the “vegan” gang are not the same gang. Vegans are most concerned with animal cruelty. The meat substitutes such as Impossible Burger are HIGHLY ultra-processed. They sound like something from a chemistry lab:

    Plant Protein (21%) (Soy), Coconut Oil, Thickener (INS 461), Glutamic Acid, Cultured Dextrose, Modified Starch, Yeast Extract, Soy Leghemoglobin (genetically modified), Antioxidant (INS 307b), Vitamins and Minerals (Zinc Gluconate, Niacin (Vitamin B3), Thiamine …

    Real meat OTOH is the polar opposite. The only ingredient in a package of hamburger is meat. One ingredient – ground up cow.

    No one has been able to perfect it and produce it at a reasonable cost, but lab grown meat really seemed to offer the perfect alternative. If you are going to culture cells in a lab, there’s no need to culture DNA modified insect cells. You can culture the cells of a plain old genetically unmodified cow. Take one little biopsy of Bessie in the field and reproduce it a billion times. This had the potential to unite the vegan crowd (no need to kill animals) and the all natural crowd (one ingredient – meat) and the I want my meat crowd (it’s just cow meat grown in a new way). But no one has been able to economically scale this up to a mass production level.

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @Jack D

    https://ifunny.co/picture/vegans-combining-5-carcinogens-and-10-industrial-chemicals-to-make-MijbgyfpA

  158. The new current thing is whatever Jews want.

  159. @New Dealer
    @Henry Canaday

    The Chicago economists, don't recall the cite, argued that no-fault divorce worsens the bargaining position of the wife. The party with more resources (can try harder, can wait longer, can more afford to walk away) has a bargaining advantage over the party with fewer resources . On average, wives are at a bargaining disadvantage in a separation, because their time spent with children in the household makes them less trained and less senior in the labor market compared to the husband, and wives are more emotionally attached to the children.

    In a fault regime, both parties have to consent to dissolution, which equalizes their bargaining power.

    And, according to my forgotten source, data support the prediction: when a non-fault regime is imposed women receive worse divorce settlements.

    And, if I remember correctly, the source shows that women started to delay marriage and invest more in college tightly in response to the advent of no-fault divorce regimes (measurable because no-fault started in different states in different years).

    If I have it wrong, correct me kindly.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon

    But… afaik (certainly in the UK) no fault divorce where wife gets the kids (nearly all cases) means

    a) wife keeps the house (even if she needs to up the mortgage)
    b) she gets cash support from hubby “because of the kids”.

    Hubby ends up in a bedsit and sees the kids on weekends.

    And yet and yet … of our little group of young middle class parents, the men whose wives binned them out are all partnered again, some with children by Wife #2. All the women who did the binning are single.

    • Replies: @Bill Jones
    @YetAnotherAnon

    So the binning women got kids, a house and an income stream from hubby One.
    Why remarry?

  160. @Muggles
    @songbird

    Prior to effective modern birth control (circa 1960) there were a lot of "underage" girls who became pregnant, usually by older males.

    Still common in Third World places and in poorer, mainly non White communities elsewhere.

    Prior to birth control, most of these births were farmed out to orphanages or adopted by relatives. Or the young couple got married, whatever the local custom allowed.

    One suspects that in Paleo and ancient times, most of our ancestors were born "under age of consent" since biology and sex drives start pretty early. One reason why "the patriarchy" was the predominant form of family organization.

    Young females were locked up by family members and older females in clan arrangements to keep from being impregnated. Also, as a consequence, could be bartered as "brides" to outsiders for goods, livestock, cash or clan affiliate benefits. Still a common practice in places like Muslim or African, Indian societies.

    Of course when average lifespans were under 40, this was not only common but probably necessary.

    Those fairy tale "princess brides" and literary ones like Juliet were often "under age" by modern standards. Mortality by childbirth also very high. A different world.

    Replies: @Jack D, @Reg Cæsar

    In premodern times it was not uncommon for a child to find out later in life that their “mother” was really their grandmother and their “sister” or their “aunt” was actually their mother. Aside from adoption, this was one way of dealing with teen pregnancies.

    The combination ploy was Loretta Young who became pregnant by Clark Gable. She then disappeared for a few months during her pregnancy and when she reemerged it was announced that she had “adopted” a baby (she adopted her own baby). Apparently the child bore a striking resemblance to her father (without the mustache) and everyone in Hollywood knew what was up, except for the poor child herself who did not find out until she was a newlywed and her husband explained to her why she was the spitting image of Clark Gable in a dress.

  161. @Bill Jones
    @Anonymous

    Thanks for that quote I'd forgotten it.

    As for:


    straightlaced chain smoking Edwardian gent, Orwell
     
    We are talking about the Eric Blair who fought for the communists in the late 1930's?

    Replies: @Anonymous

    He was an old Etonian born at the height of Edwardian pomp.

    • Replies: @Bill Jones
    @Anonymous

    Straightlaced?

  162. Anonymous[205] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon7
    @Gruesome Newsom

    I don't know if it will be the "New Thing" but the current thing is leftist state governors trying to convince people to take migrants into their homes.

    So, combining the trend of millennial children moving back into their parent's McMansions, there are still empty rooms. So, fill them with migrants, who can help take care of the aging parents, and since these migrants will collect our tax dollars, they can also contribute some money.

    New business model.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @David Davenport, @Colin Wright

    Yep, and they will incentivize this policy by encouraging the ‘migrants’ to work as domestic servants in lieu of paying rent, and what do you know, big fat dumb stupid whitey is cast way back in the 18th century when he was the big fat evil oppressor of people of color, importing them and forcing them to do his shit work for no pay.

  163. @Jack D
    @Muggles

    Of course most people don't know the Crimean War from a hole in the ground and probably 30 years from now the same will be true of Ukraine, but for those who do know, there are a lot of parallels.

    You have an aggressive expansionist Russia opportunistically trying to take advantage of what it perceives as a weaker neighbor (the Ottoman Empire) under trumped up (similar) grounds - allegedly the protection of Orthodox Christians living in the neighbor's country. Fearing the growth of influence of the Russian Empire, the British and French (and later the Italians) intervene on the side of the weaker neighbor.

    Let's hope that the aftermath follows similar lines as well (from the Wiki):


    The Crimean War marked a turning point for the Russian Empire. The war weakened the Imperial Russian Army, drained the treasury and undermined Russia's influence in Europe. The empire would take decades to recover. Russia's humiliation forced its educated elites to identify its problems and recognise the need for fundamental reforms. They saw rapid modernisation as the sole way to recover the empire's status as a European power. The war thus became a catalyst for reforms of Russia's social institutions, including the abolition of serfdom and overhauls in the justice system, local self-government, education and military service.
     

    Replies: @Hypnotoad666, @Bardon Kaldian

    Let’s hope that the aftermath follows similar lines as well (from the Wiki)

    The West spent a lot of blood and treasure to help prop up the Ottoman Empire. Yeah, that sounds like another winner for Democracy and Western values. But at least they got to “harm” Russia, by making them spend blood and treasure, also. I guess I can see the parallels now that you mention it.

    Irrational and emotional hatred of any country or people is not a sound basis for foreign policy. But the morons that run our foreign policy are motivated by irrational hatred of Russia and irrational love of Israel. It’s pathetic.

    • Agree: J.Ross
    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Hypnotoad666

    Yeah, you're probably right that it won't follow similar lines. Russia is a hopeless case now. A revolution, two world wars, 70 years of Communism and 20 years of dictatorship destroyed their human capital. Anyone with brains has either left or is dead.


    Russia’s humiliation forced its educated elites to identify its problems and recognise the need for fundamental reforms.

     

    NOPE, won't happen again.

    They saw rapid modernisation as the sole way to recover the empire’s status as a European power.

     

    NOPE, won't happen again.

    The war thus became a catalyst for reforms of Russia’s social institutions, including the abolition of serfdom and overhauls in the justice system, local self-government, education and military service.

     

    NOPE, won't happen again, either. It will just be Putin and his buddies robbing the Russian people blind for the foreseeable future. I don't see a way out of this, sadly. It's difficult for the tree of democracy to grow in a place where the soil has been so deeply soaked in blood. The Russian people are given crumbs by their masters and they are grateful that it's not a bullet to the head like before.

    Replies: @TWS, @Joe Stalin, @Hypnotoad666

    , @Twinkie
    @Hypnotoad666


    Irrational and emotional hatred of any country or people is not a sound basis for foreign policy. But the morons that run our foreign policy are motivated by irrational hatred of Russia and irrational love of Israel. It’s pathetic.
     
    Neither of those is irrational in context of American domestic politics (powerful Israeli lobby, et al.).

    But they are both contrary to realism in foreign policy. As Lord Palmerston said, "nations have no permanent friends or allies, only permanent interests." From the inception, the U.S. has had three "permanent" foreign policy interests, namely:

    1. No other (at the time European) great power interference in the Western Hemisphere.
    2. Preventing the rise of another continental-scale hegemon.
    3. Freedom of the seas/unfettered international commerce.
  164. @Mike Tre
    "with catastrophic consequences for impressionable and moody young girls."

    Males are 2-4 times more likely to "transition" than females.

    "Many on the right argued that it had to be pedophilia, mostly because that grossed them out the most.... "

    Huh? Can you provide an example for this claim (I know you won't actually)? Many people have argued that the next big thing, meaning the nest big victory for homosexual degeneracy, is the decriminalization of adult homosexual men grooming and buggering pubescent aged boys. That isn't pedophilia. You continue:

    "...But all the trends point in the opposite direction: For example, the woke are increasingly disgusted by the thought of a 35-year-old man marrying a 25-year-old woman"

    Your comparison is flawed. You first reference "the right" when dismissing the incorrect classification of pedophilia, but then point to the "woke" (strangely, not the "left") when validating their supposed beliefs. So half the population's (the right) beliefs don't constitute a trend, but the other half's (the woke) beliefs do?

    Further, the unspoken reason the woke dislike older men and younger women is because it is 1. perfectly natural, 2. a normal occurrence throughout history, and 3. it facilities people (namely, whites) having more children (whether they actually do is another matter) and that by itself is what the woke is disgusted by.

    This is validated by the plausible assumption that most of those woke people who disapprove of older men and younger women would absolutely celebrate older men grooming younger males for homosexual relations.

    Further still, if polyamory is the next thing, are the woke on board? I mean, if they don't like an older man marrying a single younger woman, how are they going to feel about an older man marrying 2 or 3 or 4 younger women? Because that is likely the most probable outcome.

    Replies: @Frau Katze

    “with catastrophic consequences for impressionable and moody young girls.”

    Males are 2-4 times more likely to “transition” than females.

    It does seem that among adults, M > F is the most popular.

    But there’s a fad going around young teen girls about being trans.

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @Frau Katze

    Steve has focused on this. In a nutshell, becoming a woman really, really sucks in many ways, to include simple unexplained body pain, but also learning about your own relative vulnerabity, and the tranny thing offers girls an escape from unpleasantness.

    Replies: @Frau Katze, @prosa123

    , @Reg Cæsar
    @Frau Katze


    But there’s a fad going around young teen girls about being trans.
     
    Faddism [that was just "autocorrected" to "fascism"!] is just being conformist in the short term. But this is extreme, young women's desire for conformity overrides their natural female desire for caution. This used to be expressed in boyfriends that shocked mother. But mother, and more so father, still had a chance to correct this. Tattoos, let alone more extreme mutilations, are irreversible.

    In a way, it's elder abuse. Carrie Gress compares it to chapucismo, the intentional destruction of great art works, and links it to adolescent fashion:

    It’s human nature that, as women, we’re susceptible to trends. It’s seen as a virtue to be breezily trendy or to look as if you stepped out of a fashion magazine. But trends aren’t limited to fabric colors and hairstyles. They extend deeply into patterns of thought and behavior.


    One well-documented current trend – a sort of social contagion among high-school and college women – is to venture into the world of testosterone injections and gender-fluidity.


    https://www.thecatholicthing.org/2021/03/09/time-for-a-restoration-of-womens-glory/

     

  165. @Muggles
    @songbird

    Prior to effective modern birth control (circa 1960) there were a lot of "underage" girls who became pregnant, usually by older males.

    Still common in Third World places and in poorer, mainly non White communities elsewhere.

    Prior to birth control, most of these births were farmed out to orphanages or adopted by relatives. Or the young couple got married, whatever the local custom allowed.

    One suspects that in Paleo and ancient times, most of our ancestors were born "under age of consent" since biology and sex drives start pretty early. One reason why "the patriarchy" was the predominant form of family organization.

    Young females were locked up by family members and older females in clan arrangements to keep from being impregnated. Also, as a consequence, could be bartered as "brides" to outsiders for goods, livestock, cash or clan affiliate benefits. Still a common practice in places like Muslim or African, Indian societies.

    Of course when average lifespans were under 40, this was not only common but probably necessary.

    Those fairy tale "princess brides" and literary ones like Juliet were often "under age" by modern standards. Mortality by childbirth also very high. A different world.

    Replies: @Jack D, @Reg Cæsar

    Of course when average lifespans were under 40, this was not only common but probably necessary.

    Yes, epidemics would take out people of parenting age, but most of the average-lifespan difference between then and now is a result of conditions in infancy and early childhood. A least since the onset of civilization. Results may vary for nomadic and hunter-gatherer societies.

    There were plenty of grandparents around.

  166. OT:

    US Senate Republican leader says he will retire
    Mitch McConnell of Kentucky intends to remain in his seat through 2027, however

    […]
    “One of life’s most underappreciated talents is to know when it’s time to move on to life’s next chapter,” the 82-year-old said in a speech on the Senate floor. “So I stand before you today … to say that this will be my last term as Republican leader of the Senate.”
    [….]
    “That said, I believe more strongly than ever that America’s global leadership is essential to preserving the shining city on a hill that Ronald Reagan discussed. For as long as I am drawing breath on this earth I will defend American exceptionalism.”

    https://www.rt.com/news/593337-us-senate-republican-leader-retires/

    Good old American exceptionalism.

    • Replies: @CalCooledge
    @Cagey Beast

    American exceptionalism.
    Exceptionally morally twisted and weird, and accepting of criminality by holy POC s.
    People should stop cheerleading for AE.

  167. @BB753
    @Reg Cæsar

    If the guy has a fake vagina, his masturbations must be faked as well as his orgasms... I understand he's a freak but what's the difference with bunking with a female prisoner who masturbates?

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    Level of aggression?

    I’m with Selective Service and Dr David Reuben on this one: there is no such thing as a “sex change”. Ever. Stuck in the Seventies!

    • Agree: BB753
  168. @Frau Katze
    @Mike Tre


    “with catastrophic consequences for impressionable and moody young girls.”

    Males are 2-4 times more likely to “transition” than females.
     
    It does seem that among adults, M > F is the most popular.

    But there’s a fad going around young teen girls about being trans.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Reg Cæsar

    Steve has focused on this. In a nutshell, becoming a woman really, really sucks in many ways, to include simple unexplained body pain, but also learning about your own relative vulnerabity, and the tranny thing offers girls an escape from unpleasantness.

    • Replies: @Frau Katze
    @J.Ross

    That sounds about right.

    , @prosa123
    @J.Ross

    In a nutshell, becoming a woman really, really sucks in many ways, to include simple unexplained body pain, but also learning about your own relative vulnerabity, and the tranny thing offers girls an escape from unpleasantness.

    I don't get the vulnerability part. Men are much more likely to become victims of violent crime.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Frau Katze

  169. @Jack D
    @Muggles

    The "natural foods/anti-Ultra processed" gang and the "vegan" gang are not the same gang. Vegans are most concerned with animal cruelty. The meat substitutes such as Impossible Burger are HIGHLY ultra-processed. They sound like something from a chemistry lab:

    Plant Protein (21%) (Soy), Coconut Oil, Thickener (INS 461), Glutamic Acid, Cultured Dextrose, Modified Starch, Yeast Extract, Soy Leghemoglobin (genetically modified), Antioxidant (INS 307b), Vitamins and Minerals (Zinc Gluconate, Niacin (Vitamin B3), Thiamine ...

    Real meat OTOH is the polar opposite. The only ingredient in a package of hamburger is meat. One ingredient - ground up cow.

    No one has been able to perfect it and produce it at a reasonable cost, but lab grown meat really seemed to offer the perfect alternative. If you are going to culture cells in a lab, there's no need to culture DNA modified insect cells. You can culture the cells of a plain old genetically unmodified cow. Take one little biopsy of Bessie in the field and reproduce it a billion times. This had the potential to unite the vegan crowd (no need to kill animals) and the all natural crowd (one ingredient - meat) and the I want my meat crowd (it's just cow meat grown in a new way). But no one has been able to economically scale this up to a mass production level.

    Replies: @J.Ross

  170. @BB753
    @Jonathan Mason

    In the Middle Ages, in Europe, even princesses would marry between the ages of 11-16, to much older men.

    Replies: @Frau Katze

    In the Middle Ages, in Europe, even princesses would marry between the ages of 11-16, to much older men.

    Especially princesses. Marriages were arranged for political purposes.

    • Agree: BB753, kaganovitch
    • Replies: @BB753
    @Frau Katze

    Agreed, but they still had to do the deed and wives were expected to produce heirs as soon as possible.

  171. The next big thing is taking away parents’ rights. Children will belong to the State. That way everyone is happy: the gay pedophiles, the childfree harpies, the slave masters, the progressive educators, the organ traffickers and those simply envious of “a man, a woman, their children”.

  172. @Jack D
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    These are two contradictory things - the people who could BEST afford single parenthood are the ones who least engage in it and the ones who can least afford it do it the most. The rich used to preach "middle class values" to the poor but that's so judgmental. Can't be judgmental anymore.

    Musk is an exception. He has babies all over the place like some ghetto baby daddy. 11 IIRC. He has custody of one of them and brings him everywhere, accompanied by the kid's nanny and bodyguard. Musk believes that smart, rich people having a lot of children is eugenic. Nazi!

    https://twitter.com/Iam_StephenMusk/status/1761553781135725015

    I believe this kid's name is X Æ A-12 Musk.

    Replies: @Dutch Boy, @deep anonymous, @Frau Katze

    I believe this kid’s name is X Æ A-12 Musk.

    I’m a Musk fan but I think his taste in names (for kids and companies) leaves something to be desired.

  173. @New Dealer
    @AnotherDad

    Yes, polyamory would be terrible for children.

    There is another huge drawback. In a normal household of man, woman, couple of kids, you can never find a damned thing. Somebody didn't put the can opener back, you find it a few days later under the sink. Or one of the grownups decides to reorganize the kitchen cupboards again. You find your razor in the toilet tank and your shaving cream in the backyard. Your best sweater is missing for some reason. Your socket set is no longer with your tools, but somehow ended up with the pots and pans.

    All that would be exponentially worse in a polyamorous household.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Muggles, @DenverGregg, @hhsiii, @Colin Wright

    a poly group that appears to include three girls and two boys moved in near me a couple years ago. it is now by far the worst kept house on the block. all their vehicles are barely-functioning and replete with dents and scratches.

  174. Will Britain’s Conservative Party live long enough to have the first openly polyamorous Prime Minister? Fingers crossed!!

  175. Polyamory as a thing has always existed and making it a status with a name won’t change anything. What difference has gay marriage made? “Minor celeb Mike Smith and his husband…”, that’s what. At most the normalisation of something that is far from new.

    Something I have noticed recently, in connection with Covid vaccination and transitioning, is the principle that the interests of the child are paramount. The vaccines were administered in schools with a great deal of encouragement to take them, and there have been many cases of school policies on pronouns and transitioning overriding parental wishes. In other words, the interests of the school (and for school, read state) are paramount. There is huge potential here. For starters, how about schools with targets for carbon-neutral students and powers to enforce them in the home? Indirectly of course. “The city council has determined that you are an educationally carbon-neutral household…”

  176. @Bugg
    @Matthew Kelly

    Polyamory invariably is going to be a Muslim disaster of a family gaming the system for benefits and contributing nothing while barely raising their kids. Or ugly urban weirdos in cities. Nobody thinks some aging Jewish Park Slope whore pretending to be cutting edge is a trend to follow spare a few moron overeducated Times readers. She's a whore. It will not be Bill Paxton owning a string of hardware stores raising his prosperous productive family with multiple hot wives. It's bad public policy. Arab countries have been a mess forever in part because excess unmarried young men.

    They thought trans was gonna fly. Alas now Bud Light has Kid Rock, the UFC and Dana White to make amends. Nobody wants to lose money. Well except Hollywood, apparently. Every movie must now feature black girl magic, or Jeffrey Wright or Mashereyechart Ali (nee Hershal Gilmore, quite boring and ordinary and or likely to attract much notice of casting directors, but black AND Muslim, hot damn! ) overacting and saying how evil those white devils are to be considered Oscar-worthy.

    Replies: @Truth, @Anon

    They thought trans was gonna fly. Alas now Bud Light has Kid Rock, the UFC and Dana White to make amends. Nobody wants to lose money.

    It’s not about money when your owners PRINT the money.

  177. @J.Ross
    @Frau Katze

    Steve has focused on this. In a nutshell, becoming a woman really, really sucks in many ways, to include simple unexplained body pain, but also learning about your own relative vulnerabity, and the tranny thing offers girls an escape from unpleasantness.

    Replies: @Frau Katze, @prosa123

    That sounds about right.

  178. @Gordo
    Miscegenation for Whites.

    Not new but always a constant massive push by the hostile ruling ‘elite’.

    Replies: @Corvinus

    “Miscegenation for Whites. Not new but always a constant massive push by the hostile ruling ‘elite’. ”

    More like a personal decision by normal people. Well within their liberty. Just ask John Derbyshire.

    • LOL: Truth
  179. … the woke are increasingly disgusted by the thought of a 35-year-old man marrying a 25-year-old woman …

    Oh, come on! Is this serious?

    I was a 41-year-old man who married a 31-year-old woman, in the year 2001.

    She likes to tell me that when I am 100 and she is only 90 she will drive me around in the Mercedes-Benz convertible I bought for her.

    Ohh! I married a younger chick!

    Okay, having previously dated younger women, I note certain things. The funniest one is that she, like every other younger woman I dated, likes Guns N’ Roses. They all do, ten years younger than me. I’ll take that.

    Men, take it from me: Marry a girl ten years younger. That is the ideal number!

    Now, this comment might take some time before y’all get to read it.

  180. @Hypnotoad666
    @Jack D


    Let’s hope that the aftermath follows similar lines as well (from the Wiki)
     
    The West spent a lot of blood and treasure to help prop up the Ottoman Empire. Yeah, that sounds like another winner for Democracy and Western values. But at least they got to "harm" Russia, by making them spend blood and treasure, also. I guess I can see the parallels now that you mention it.

    Irrational and emotional hatred of any country or people is not a sound basis for foreign policy. But the morons that run our foreign policy are motivated by irrational hatred of Russia and irrational love of Israel. It's pathetic.

    Replies: @Jack D, @Twinkie

    Yeah, you’re probably right that it won’t follow similar lines. Russia is a hopeless case now. A revolution, two world wars, 70 years of Communism and 20 years of dictatorship destroyed their human capital. Anyone with brains has either left or is dead.

    Russia’s humiliation forced its educated elites to identify its problems and recognise the need for fundamental reforms.

    NOPE, won’t happen again.

    They saw rapid modernisation as the sole way to recover the empire’s status as a European power.

    NOPE, won’t happen again.

    The war thus became a catalyst for reforms of Russia’s social institutions, including the abolition of serfdom and overhauls in the justice system, local self-government, education and military service.

    NOPE, won’t happen again, either. It will just be Putin and his buddies robbing the Russian people blind for the foreseeable future. I don’t see a way out of this, sadly. It’s difficult for the tree of democracy to grow in a place where the soil has been so deeply soaked in blood. The Russian people are given crumbs by their masters and they are grateful that it’s not a bullet to the head like before.

    • Agree: Frau Katze
    • LOL: Gallatin, TWS
    • Replies: @TWS
    @Jack D

    This has got to be a joke account. It's pure monomania like The Duck but the humor is more selective.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    , @Joe Stalin
    @Jack D

    https://twitter.com/Gerashchenko_en/status/1762870629454295053
    https://twitter.com/Beefeater_Fella/status/1730350790760443944

    , @Hypnotoad666
    @Jack D


    NOPE, won’t happen again, either.
     
    Your hatred of Russia is bizarre. But in case you hadn't noticed they are on the rise. They are the fastest growing economy in Europe while the EU stagnates year after year. They have diversified their economy in response to sanctions and are leading the BRICs in a global resistance to idiot U.S. foreign policy.

    I have no idea why people like you and Victoria Nuland want to make Russia the enemy, but your efforts to "weaken" it have backfired spectaculary.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Colin Wright, @Anonymous, @Peter Akuleyev

  181. @Jack D
    @Ghost of Bull Moose

    Not just the girls. I have in my career come across several instances where men had two complete families in different cities. They (especially family #1 - the wife to which he is legally married, sometimes the other one knows) only found out about each other only after the man dies. This leads to lawsuits quite often. I am talking about successful white men, not ghetto baby daddies. Lindbergh being a famous example.

    Christianity is unusual for requiring monogamy. This was not true of Judaism or of Islam or many Eastern religions. It appears that they inherited this from the Romans. Christianity was a Middle Eastern religion that was taken up by Greeks and Romans and so it has aspects of both cultures. For example they also followed the food customs of the Romans and not the Jews. It may be that certain aspects of culture are deeper than any new religion so that the new religion yields to the deeper practice. Of course this will be given a religious rationalization just as the Christian rationalization as to why the Biblical dietary restrictions no longer apply to them. Or sometimes it is the other way around. Mormons are notoriously white bread American in their culture but certain aspects of their new religion (polygamy) took precedence. When new religion clashes with existing culture it doesn't always go the same way.

    As the West becomes post-Christian/non-Western, it may be that monogamy is a Roman/Christian practice that will fall away.

    Replies: @ben tillman, @Ghost of Bull Moose

    Yes. Louis Kahn had three such families IIRC. I’m not sure it’s so unheard of.

  182. @anonymous
    @MEH 0910

    Have the Coen brothers split-up professionally ?

    Replies: @MEH 0910

    https://www.fangoria.com/original/the-coen-brothers-reportedly-making-a-very-bloody-horror-movie/

    The Coen Brothers Reportedly Making A Very Bloody Horror Movie
    Joel and Ethan Coen have been working separately for several years but horror is bringing them back together.
    BY RYAN SCOTT · JANUARY 29, 2024

    [MORE]

    The Coen Brothers have not directed a film together since 2018’s The Ballad of Buster Scruggs for Netflix. Since then, the legendary duo of Joel and Ethan have been making films separately. But fear not! The brothers are soon going to reunite behind the camera and, what’s more, it’s a horror movie that will be getting them back together. Details are currently slim, but the news comes directly from Ethan Coen.

    As reported by World of Reel, Ethan Coen and his Drive Away Dolls collaborator/co-writer Tricia Cooke recently held a Master Class conversation put on by the Tromso International Film Festival in Norway. During that conversation, Ethan confirmed that he and Joel have written a new script together, and they apparently intend to direct it in the near future. Here’s what he had to say about it:

    “It’s a pure horror film, and it gets very bloody. If you like Blood Simple, I think you’ll enjoy it.”

    […]
    As for what the movie might be about? That, for now, remains wholly mysterious. Though Cooke did say that the script is “horribly funny.” So a dark, bloody horror/comedy directed by the Coen Brothers? That sounds pretty enticing. The only downside is that both Joel and Ethan Coen may have other projects to wrap up first before they can truly get this one off the ground.

    The report notes that Joel might have to finish another project first, but that project was not named. Joel most recently directed 2021’s The Tragedy of MacBeth. Ethan, meanwhile, has Drive Away Dolls coming out later this year, and he is also attached to direct a comedy titled Honey Don’t! that appears to be coming together quickly. So, worst-case scenario, this mysterious horror film would have to wait until those projects are in the books. Stay tuned as we’ll surely be learning more sooner rather than later.

    • Replies: @anonymous
    @MEH 0910

    Thanks. That's great to hear.

  183. @Guest007
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    Not three men:

    Not a picture from when Caster Semenya won gold at the World Championships.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_World_Championships_in_Athletics_%E2%80%93_Women%27s_800_metres

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caster_Semenya

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janeth_Jepkosgei

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jenny_Meadows

    I might have the wrong race bud I could not find another world championship for Semenya.

    Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic

    You really are tripping over mouse poop.

    • Replies: @Guest007
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    Why make a reply without answer a simple question of who is in that picture and what was the vent. The one time that Semanya won a gold metal in an international even, the third place finisher was white.

  184. The poly phenomenon will grow but I doubt it will get out of control like the trans issue.

    There do not seem to be many long-term poly ‘families’, let alone some sort of push to sanction them getting married as 3 or more. Figuring out how to split assets in divorces would get even crazier.

    Much of the phenomenon is driven by behavioral economics. With the cost of divorce high, men are slower to commit to a woman who earns much less. But they still like them if the look nice.

    The internet and dating sites lead both genders, but especially women, to want to hold out for the best possible partner. Some of the ‘polys’ are stuck waiting to be the last one standing, or frittering away time instead of looking for a stable partnership.

    Men still have a higher sex drive than women, so an older man with younger woman evens that out some. I suspect poly triads can support similar age partners with differing sex drives due to the surplus. It funny that whenever a TV show or movie brings up sex drive, they always show the male as the one not wanting it. It’s the equivalent of always making the white guy the baddie despite the stats.

  185. with computer nerds who lack the gene for sexual jealousy demanding “polyamory”

    There is not a gene for sexual jealousy. That is a very simplistic and erroneous conception of what genetics is about, even by modern biology’s own lights. I expect as much from HBDers, but this is truly “Lance Welton” levels of scientific illiteracy. I will be very telling of the characters of the others on this board if nobody else objects to this, so let’s wait and see what happens.

    • Replies: @kaganovitch
    @Intelligent Dasein


    I will be very telling of the characters of the others on this board if nobody else objects to this, so let’s wait and see what happens.

     

    Who will you be telling?
  186. @deep anonymous
    @Jack D


    "Right now there is a case involving Don Henley of the Eagles and (in order to discredit his character – I really don’t understand why the judge allowed this because it is so irrelevant to the case at hand) he is being cross examined about a 16-year-old prostitute who overdosed at his home in 1980 (at the time he was given probation and a $2,500 fine)."
     
    I think the trend has been to relax Rule 404(b) in rape/sexual assault cases. In Maryland, for instance, a statute was enacted doing exactly that because the General Assembly was unhappy with a Court of Appeals decision reversing a rapist's conviction for that reason.

    (For the non-lawyers, Rule 404(b) is the evidentiary rule restricting the admissibility of propensity evidence. In a criminal trial, the defendant's guilt of prior or non-charged conduct is presumptively out of bounds except for supposedly narrow exceptions, turning on things like motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, absence of mistake, or lack of accident. MIMIC Rule)

    Replies: @Jack D

    The case at hand is a state criminal prosecution of 3rd parties who (allegedly) stole and sold song manuscripts belonging to Henley. Henley’s propensity to have sex with underage whores (she LOOKED like she was over 18!) has zippo to do with the case at hand. Completely irrelevant. The defense counsel just wants to make Henley unsympathetic to the jury. I really don’t know why the judge allowed it. There are some really crap judges out there. As our society has declined so too has the quality of some judges.

    • Agree: deep anonymous
    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @Jack D

    ALL OF MY "AGREE."
    Are you following the trials of Fanny?
    I think the Trump lawfare is desperate performative BS whoch will all be thrown out later on appeal, they just need to "do sonething" like Michael Obama once demanded. SCOTUS has given cert to Trump's immunity claim and the only one going forward is the least politically damaging one.

    , @deep anonymous
    @Jack D

    Thanks for the explanation. So Henley isn't a defendant, and as you say, his sexual picadilloes are entirely irrelevant to the case.

    I can vouch for your comment about the declining quality of some judges. I'd better not say more because of my obligation of confidentiality, but I have some war stories.

  187. @Jack D
    @Muggles

    Of course most people don't know the Crimean War from a hole in the ground and probably 30 years from now the same will be true of Ukraine, but for those who do know, there are a lot of parallels.

    You have an aggressive expansionist Russia opportunistically trying to take advantage of what it perceives as a weaker neighbor (the Ottoman Empire) under trumped up (similar) grounds - allegedly the protection of Orthodox Christians living in the neighbor's country. Fearing the growth of influence of the Russian Empire, the British and French (and later the Italians) intervene on the side of the weaker neighbor.

    Let's hope that the aftermath follows similar lines as well (from the Wiki):


    The Crimean War marked a turning point for the Russian Empire. The war weakened the Imperial Russian Army, drained the treasury and undermined Russia's influence in Europe. The empire would take decades to recover. Russia's humiliation forced its educated elites to identify its problems and recognise the need for fundamental reforms. They saw rapid modernisation as the sole way to recover the empire's status as a European power. The war thus became a catalyst for reforms of Russia's social institutions, including the abolition of serfdom and overhauls in the justice system, local self-government, education and military service.
     

    Replies: @Hypnotoad666, @Bardon Kaldian

    I would recommend to all non-idiots to read columns & watch Dan Schueftan videos:

    https://www.israelhayom.com/writer/dan-schueftan/page/2/

    For instance: https://www.israelhayom.com/opinions/ukraine-invasion-is-putins-gift-to-the-western-world/

    https://www.israelhayom.com/opinions/is-ukraine-headed-for-a-rude-awakening/

    https://www.israelhayom.com/opinions/crying-racism-while-denying-reality/

    To sum it:

    * Americans are force for the good, but they are frequently disastrous in their parochialism & “operational mind”. Strategic mind is dealing with situations where there are no solutions. See under Eisenhower 1956 & Nasser, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan,..

    * Israel is the only developed country where non-zombified secular women want children

    * gifted peoples ruled by barbarians are the real danger (Germany, now Iran)

    * the only Middle Eastern gifted peoples are Israelis and Iranians

    * nationalism is good & the bad thing is extreme nationalism, so post-1945 fight against nationalism in the Western world was a grave mistake

    * the Western world is the pinnacle of everything, but you cannot force its values on the rest

    * with Arabs- better enlightened absolutism than democracy leading to Islamism

    * anti-waxxers should be isolated from the normal world

    * Harvard professors live in la-la-land, similar to most American foreign policy makers

    * Obama and Carter were suckers & Nixon was the man

    * Palestinians are incurable

    * Israelis tend to fall asleep politically every 10 or 20 years

    * Putin already lost the war

    Also, two videos from 1 year & 2 months ago (hosts are annoying with their interruptions)

    • Replies: @Muggles
    @Bardon Kaldian


    * anti-waxxers should be isolated from the normal world
     
    You throw out a lot of stuff here, but this one seemed outside of the norm

    Why do you care about this now? (I hate to bring this up since this whole vax/COVID thing is old news and not very interesting).

    Do you care if others had polio vax or measles vax?

    While I was vaxed, mainly for travel purposes (Canada was fussy/fascist) as it turned out the multiple vaxed DC Beltway elites were all vaxed often more than once. And practically all of the pooh-bahs got COVID multiple times. Didn't harm them much either.

    My older friend who was very anti vax never got it either. Nor did I.

    So the pseudo RNA "vaccine" didn't work that well, though maybe did some good. Oh, and these same COVID bullies also wore masks all the time (except at their private parties...)

    People who didn't go for that (took their own risk) should be locked up? You are dangerously stupid on that.

    The continuing "mask wearers" are just letting us know who is a Fauci Democrat worshiper, Asian, or scared old person who thinks this is going to protect them. Better to wear a St. Christopher medallion.

    You think COVIDians are "normal" and those who aren't believers should be locked up?

    Ruining your credibility here.

    (Please, let's avoid this subject entirely as much as possible...)

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Bardon Kaldian

  188. @MEH 0910
    https://www.moviemaker.com/drive-away-dolls-ethan-coen-tricia-cooke/

    Drive-Away Dolls: How Ethan Coen and Tricia Cooke’s Long Marriage Shaped Their Lesbian Road-Trip Movie
     

    [...]
    I let Ethan and Joel know that I really wanted to work as an editor, and asked if they had any positions available in New York as an apprentice,” says Cooke. “Apparently they already had an apprentice, but they made room for me too, so that was kind.”

    Cooke hit it off with Ethan Coen almost immediately. But they wanted different things.

    “Ethan asked me on a date and we went to see Drugstore Cowboy,” she says. “I told him, ‘I’m a lesbian, I’m not interested.’”

    So they became friends for a while. But the relationship evolved. They married in 1993, and had two kids.

    They also made amazing films together: Cooke, now very much a fan of the Coens’ work, was the assistant editor of their 1991 film Barton Fink and 1994 follow-up The Hudsucker Proxy. And Cooke became the editor of their 1998 The Big Lebowski, 2000’s O Brother, Where Art Thou?, and 2001’s The Man Who Wasn’t There. She edited the latter with the brothers, who used their editing pseudonym, Roderick Jaynes.

    So they became friends for a while. But the relationship evolved. They married in 1993, and had two kids.

    But sometime after that, Joel and Ethan Coen started using Final Cut to edit. And Cooke came to a personal decision involving her kids.

    “As they got a little older, I realized they were going to grow up and I wasn’t going to be able to spend any time with them if I was in the cutting room 10 to 12 hours a day, which is often the case,” says Cooke. “So I decided to slow down and start writing more.”

    She co-directed a documentary with her friend Jennifer Arnold called Where the Girls Are, a comedic short about the history, parties and conflicts of the Dinah Shore Weekend, a giant lesbian pool party in Palm Springs. It won the Outstanding Narrative Short Film at Outfest in 2003.

    She also co-directed the 2008 short “Don’t Mess With Texas” with Carrie Schrader. Cooke co-wrote the film, about two young lesbians who run into trouble at a diner, with Coen.

    “Being married to Ethan and being queer there’s always a little disconnect sometimes,” she laughs. “I wanted to be able to make queer films as well.”

    Coen and Cooke decided in the aughts that they should write a feature screenplay, which they originally called Drive-Away Dykes.

    “We wrote Drive-Away Dykes together many, many years ago as a way for us to spend time together,” says Cooke.

    By then, the couple were no longer in a traditional partnership.

    “We have a very non-traditional marriage and relationship where there’s a bigger unit,” says Cooke. “I have a partner and Ethan has another partner.”

    She adds: “It’s not easy sometimes and it can be very difficult for even our friends and family to understand. You navigate it one day at a time. We’ve been in this kind of dynamic for over 20 years, and we still take it one day at a time.”

    “It’s funny because our whole relationship is like, “What, me worry?” says Coen, quoting Mad Magazine poster boy Alfred E. Newman. “And that’s also the movie.”

    So that’s the backstory of Drive-Away Dolls. Or Drive-Away Dykes. Whichever you prefer.
     

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drive-Away_Dolls

    https://screenrant.com/drive-away-dolls-movie-box-office-opening-weekend/


    Ethan Coen's New Movie Has Disastrous Box Office Opening, Misses Top 5 In First Weekend
    The new Ethan Coen movie Drive-Away Dolls barely makes it into the Top 10 in its domestic opening weekend, landing at No. 8 with a paltry debut.
     
    https://www.slashfilm.com/1526800/ethan-coen-drive-away-dolls-box-office-disappointment/

    Ethan Coen's Drive-Away Dolls Is A Big Box Office Disappointment
     
    DRIVE-AWAY DOLLS - Official Trailer [HD] - Only In Theaters February 23
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oy0RYiQRWUk
    Jun 23, 2023

    Written by Ethan Coen and Tricia Cooke, this comedy caper follows Jamie, an uninhibited free spirit bemoaning yet another breakup with a girlfriend, and her demure friend Marian who desperately needs to loosen up. In search of a fresh start, the two embark on an impromptu road trip to Tallahassee, but things quickly go awry when they cross paths with a group of inept criminals along the way. Directed by Ethan Coen.
     
    DRIVE-AWAY DOLLS - Official Trailer 2 [HD] - Only In Theaters February 23
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vy_7UGICJU
    Feb 6, 2024

    Replies: @Redneck Farmer, @BB753, @SFG, @Muggles, @anonymous, @AnotherDad

    Ethan Coen’s New Movie Has Disastrous Box Office Opening, Misses Top 5 In First Weekend
    The new Ethan Coen movie Drive-Away Dolls barely makes it into the Top 10 in its domestic opening weekend, landing at No. 8 with a paltry debut.

    LOL.

    Amazing these people can not figure out the obvious. Queers–I mean male queers, the word apparently has been repurposed to something or another–are viscerally disgusting, but lesbians are just boring.

    Women and their stories are interesting because of sex–their capability to make babies with a man. Therefore man-woman coupling, “who will match with and make babies with whom?”–which speaks to lineage and the future–is of some dramatic interest.

    Men can be of interest beyond that. Men make war and ergo decide the fate of nations and empires. Men break the law and other men hunt down and suppress the lawbreakers. Men sail around the world and discover new lands. Men come up with new ideas and inventions and make things that fly and go boom. Some drama.

    Women, strip away sex–the “who will she make babies with”–are rather boring. They … talk.

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @AnotherDad

    I had advised tbe Coens to make CAS's The Door To Saturn and here we are. This premise doesn't seem useless, though; had this movie been made in the late 70s it would probably rock.

    , @Mike Tre
    @AnotherDad

    Related to the hollywood gay craze:

    No Netflix, Alexander the Great was NOT GAY

    https://youtu.be/9G5pDs40iiU?si=2dgrYzu7NuVDeXB5

    , @Twinkie
    @AnotherDad


    Amazing these people can not figure out the obvious. Queers–I mean male queers, the word apparently has been repurposed to something or another–are viscerally disgusting, but lesbians are just boring.
     
    I read a survey some years ago, which showed that heterosexual males and females and homosexual females all found visual depictions of male homosexuality repellent, with only the homosexual males responding to it positively. But the visual depiction of female homosexuality was found to be more universally (if mildly) appealing in the survey, except by homosexual males. So, my takeaway from the survey was that homosexual males were the weirdos, the odd men out, if you will.

    Women, strip away sex–the “who will she make babies with”–are rather boring.
     
    I find women fascinating even without sex. First of all, I find women to be very beautiful creatures (and I'm not just talking about sexually appealing in that lustful sense). Were I an artist, I'd want to draw and paint them.

    I used to watch my girls play with dolls and animals and found their engagement with the latter utterly captivating. I guess a part of it is that I am a man, so there is much to the female nature that I find "exotic" and often baffling (sometimes frustratingly so, but other times intriguingly so too). That which I do not understand or comprehend fully I find both challenging and interesting. To me, many of my fellow men are quite predictable.
    , @Looger
    @AnotherDad


    Ethan Coen’s New Movie Has Disastrous Box Office Opening
     
    I heard these guys retired from movies after "Buster Scruggs" but obviously one kept going. I guess we know now who's the talented one (Joel, the quiet one in interviews).

    Though most of their comedies bomb, even the good ones ("The Big Lebowski" theater was empty in 1998 when I went).

    As to AnotherDad's point, I've noticed also that mens' stories seem to grab all audiences more that's for sure.

    There are a couple "womens' stories" movies I've liked but without car chases, explosions etc. it's an uphill battle.

    Ghost World
    Bound
    The Tao of Steve (follows my accidental 'formula' for picking up women)
    Jawbreaker
    Jackie Brown
    Safety Not Guaranteed
    Colossal
    , @Jack D
    @AnotherDad


    sex–their capability to make babies with a man.
     
    Sex and having babies are two different things, especially in the modern world where they are quite divorced from each other. It is said that some primitive tribes don't even make the connection between the two. Although it is said that the characteristics that men find attractive (youth, symmetry, etc.) are signals of fertility, men don't see an attractive woman in the street and assess her child bearing capacity as if they were buying a breeding sow. If someone whispered to you that a certain beautiful woman was unable to bear children, would you be any less attracted to her? You might not want to marry her if you were interested in having a family (not everyone is) but it wouldn't change her attractiveness.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    , @New Dealer
    @AnotherDad

    I started liking girls a lot in the first grade, for instance, elusive Alice. Definitely not because I wanted to be a girl. And as a man I like women a lot.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    , @R.G. Camara
    @AnotherDad

    Lesbian stories are always some kind of boring psychodrama, fee-fees, and long monologues with any sex being subdued or not shown, as per Lesbian Bed Death. Straight males, if not titillated, find them either mind-numbing or hilariously awful. Perhaps the best of the lot was Fried Green Tomatoes, which smartly took out explicit lesbianism of the book and emphasized the older straight woman's story (Kathy Bates at her best) and only had the lesbianism implied through a weird food fight.

    For a while, Showtime tried to "correct" this lesbian-story-stereotype with the hilariously bad but long-lasting lesbian show The L Word, which made a point of showing the females (who were all name actresses, putting in their dues for the Lavender mafia normalization movement) constantly having sex with one another. It was pretty hilariously awful, especially since the rest of the show was...boring psychodrama, fee-fees, and long monologues. See also the current entry into this lesbian-correction genre, Orange is the New Black.

    Straight males intuitively understand that lesbianism is just a female cope when they are too ugly/too broken/too old to get a man or else can't find a strong enough man around and some aggressive ugly butch pushes themselves on them. As the expression goes, there aren't any lesbians, there're are just women who haven't met the right man yet.

    , @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @AnotherDad

    Wrong, wrong, wrong, extra sausage points for being... well, wrong.

    Speaking as the "I lived with 23 topless lesbians in a commune and survived to tell about it" expert, I can tell you that topless lesbians swaggering around pretending to be sailors are really quite fetching, even when they don't mean to do that. At least the college-age ones. You can ask my then-gf, who used to get beet-red with envy.

    As for this horse-swaggle...


    "Women, strip away sex–the “who will she make babies with”–are rather boring. They … talk."

    Most of the lesbians I know -- and I still kn0w quite a few -- transfer their maternal instincts into societal issues like homelessness. Some of them get it wrong, crusading for nonsense issues, but hey... a lot of 'em make a heck of a lot better difference in life than random internet bozos.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjrvXvGM-PI


    Well she sings a song
    So sad and high,
    And the Tulsa Queen
    Don't ever lie.


    -- La Godess Emmyou Harris, Queen of Reality

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease

    , @Corvinus
    @AnotherDad

    “Women, strip away sex–the “who will she make babies with”–are rather boring. They … talk.”

    Spoken like a man who talks tough on the Internet but in reality has his ball sack firmly in the vice grip of his wife.

    Replies: @Chris D

  189. @Jack D
    @deep anonymous

    The case at hand is a state criminal prosecution of 3rd parties who (allegedly) stole and sold song manuscripts belonging to Henley. Henley's propensity to have sex with underage whores (she LOOKED like she was over 18!) has zippo to do with the case at hand. Completely irrelevant. The defense counsel just wants to make Henley unsympathetic to the jury. I really don't know why the judge allowed it. There are some really crap judges out there. As our society has declined so too has the quality of some judges.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @deep anonymous

    ALL OF MY “AGREE.”
    Are you following the trials of Fanny?
    I think the Trump lawfare is desperate performative BS whoch will all be thrown out later on appeal, they just need to “do sonething” like Michael Obama once demanded. SCOTUS has given cert to Trump’s immunity claim and the only one going forward is the least politically damaging one.

  190. @JohnnyWalker123

    What’s next? Many on the right argued that it had to be pedophilia, mostly because that grossed them out the most. But all the trends point in the opposite direction: For example, the woke are increasingly disgusted by the thought of a 35-year-old man marrying a 25-year-old woman (presumably, a trend driven by all the single 35-year-old women fearing being permanently left on the shelf by single 35-year-old men).

     

    While various types of sexual behavior has been normalized in recent decades, I've noticed an increasingly strong societal taboo emerging around "older" men dating "younger" women.

    For example, if you were in your mid 30s and married a girl in her mid 20s, you'd be viewed as a "sexual predator."

    In today's world, homosexuals and transgenders are more "normal" than 35 year-old guys who want a wife in her 20s.

    Who could've seen this coming?

    Replies: @Guest007, @Wade Hampton

    In today’s world, homosexuals and transgenders are more “normal” than 35 year-old guys who want a wife in her 20s.

    Protip: They’re not.

  191. @AnotherDad
    @MEH 0910


    Ethan Coen’s New Movie Has Disastrous Box Office Opening, Misses Top 5 In First Weekend
    The new Ethan Coen movie Drive-Away Dolls barely makes it into the Top 10 in its domestic opening weekend, landing at No. 8 with a paltry debut.
     
    LOL.

    Amazing these people can not figure out the obvious. Queers--I mean male queers, the word apparently has been repurposed to something or another--are viscerally disgusting, but lesbians are just boring.

    Women and their stories are interesting because of sex--their capability to make babies with a man. Therefore man-woman coupling, "who will match with and make babies with whom?"--which speaks to lineage and the future--is of some dramatic interest.

    Men can be of interest beyond that. Men make war and ergo decide the fate of nations and empires. Men break the law and other men hunt down and suppress the lawbreakers. Men sail around the world and discover new lands. Men come up with new ideas and inventions and make things that fly and go boom. Some drama.

    Women, strip away sex--the "who will she make babies with"--are rather boring. They ... talk.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Mike Tre, @Twinkie, @Looger, @Jack D, @New Dealer, @R.G. Camara, @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Corvinus

    I had advised tbe Coens to make CAS’s The Door To Saturn and here we are. This premise doesn’t seem useless, though; had this movie been made in the late 70s it would probably rock.

  192. @AnotherDad
    @MEH 0910


    Ethan Coen’s New Movie Has Disastrous Box Office Opening, Misses Top 5 In First Weekend
    The new Ethan Coen movie Drive-Away Dolls barely makes it into the Top 10 in its domestic opening weekend, landing at No. 8 with a paltry debut.
     
    LOL.

    Amazing these people can not figure out the obvious. Queers--I mean male queers, the word apparently has been repurposed to something or another--are viscerally disgusting, but lesbians are just boring.

    Women and their stories are interesting because of sex--their capability to make babies with a man. Therefore man-woman coupling, "who will match with and make babies with whom?"--which speaks to lineage and the future--is of some dramatic interest.

    Men can be of interest beyond that. Men make war and ergo decide the fate of nations and empires. Men break the law and other men hunt down and suppress the lawbreakers. Men sail around the world and discover new lands. Men come up with new ideas and inventions and make things that fly and go boom. Some drama.

    Women, strip away sex--the "who will she make babies with"--are rather boring. They ... talk.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Mike Tre, @Twinkie, @Looger, @Jack D, @New Dealer, @R.G. Camara, @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Corvinus

    Related to the hollywood gay craze:

    No Netflix, Alexander the Great was NOT GAY

  193. @BB753
    @Dutch Boy

    Well, I'd rather marry a straight Mexican or Asian woman than an ugly white lesbian. Maybe Cohen thought marrying any shiksa, even a lesbian one, was better than celibacy or marrying a Jewish woman.

    Replies: @SFG, @R.G. Camara

    I think somebody said here there was sort of a hierarchy with white guys marrying ethnic women, the rich and UMC guys married Asians, the middle class married Hispanics, the lower class married blacks.

    • Replies: @Twinkie
    @SFG


    think somebody said here there was sort of a hierarchy with white guys marrying ethnic women, the rich and UMC guys married Asians, the middle class married Hispanics, the lower class married blacks.
     
    Actually, all males in America who marry out of their ethno-racial group are up-selected economically (meaning, they form a higher income couple than males who marry their ethno-racial kin). Meaning, white males who marry Asian, Hispanic, and black women all have higher average couple income than white males who marry white females. However, the level of selectivity varies:

    https://static01.nyt.com/images/2012/02/16/business/economy/economix-17interracial/economix-17interracial-blog480.jpg

    Replies: @SFG

  194. OT — Pretty funny humor thread on 4chan’s polilitics board right now.

    • LOL: Frau Katze
  195. I figured non-monogamous arrangements were in the near future 10-20 years after Gay Marriage in 2013 and sure enough things have ramped up. Who knows what other alternate relationships that Heinlein predicted are in our near future? We can safely say they are all on the table.

    The Trans-revolution floored me as I couldn’t believe so many intelligent people could re-wire their brains to deny reality in such short order. Kudos to Steve on that. I read it here but couldn’t credit it. Would have thought such a change would take generations.

    Gay marriage has turned out to have been uniquely destructive. I intuited it and for that reason always thought there should be a separate codified relationship for Gays. I recently saw a video with Alan Keyes on the topic. Always thought he was a strange fish but he’s on target here.

  196. @SFG
    @BB753

    I think somebody said here there was sort of a hierarchy with white guys marrying ethnic women, the rich and UMC guys married Asians, the middle class married Hispanics, the lower class married blacks.

    Replies: @Twinkie

    think somebody said here there was sort of a hierarchy with white guys marrying ethnic women, the rich and UMC guys married Asians, the middle class married Hispanics, the lower class married blacks.

    Actually, all males in America who marry out of their ethno-racial group are up-selected economically (meaning, they form a higher income couple than males who marry their ethno-racial kin). Meaning, white males who marry Asian, Hispanic, and black women all have higher average couple income than white males who marry white females. However, the level of selectivity varies:

    • Replies: @SFG
    @Twinkie

    Dang, over 2.5x as many WMAF as AMWF? No wonder the Asian guys are upset. (Same for the black women.)

    Anyway, looks like the difference between white guys who marry Hispanic, black, and white women is pretty minuscule as far as total household income goes. The only real outlier is the emergent Wasian master race.

    Conversely, the white women who marry out seem to be marrying down...unless it's an Asian guy.

    My guess is what's going on is the Asian-white couples (either direction) are selected for being in the UMC that's not supposed to care about race. Homogeneous black and Hispanic couples are blue-collar or recent immigrants. The rest, I guess white guys still make a little more money.

    Replies: @Twinkie

  197. @Voltarde
    What's the New Current Thing?

    Thanks to Boomers, a gerontocracy and dementia.

    Replies: @ic1000, @Reg Cæsar, @mc23

    Hey, the oldest Boomer is only 78. Our political leadership is older. But are they really running things or is the hand that rocks the wheelchair?

  198. @New Dealer
    Come to think of it, I think it most plausible that the next current thing will be socially and legally enforced veganism. Trendiness, social pressure, city bans, state initiative petitions. Easier to cut off supply than punish demand. Brought to us by pretty much the same people who have imposed the recent Things.

    https://cloudfront-eu-central-1.images.arcpublishing.com/irishtimes/7MA4AEULQC5VNNQZ7HHCDK62Q4.jpg

    https://plantbasednews.org/app/uploads/2023/09/plant-based-news-vegan-billboard-ww2.jpg

    https://stories.isu.pub/98111896/images/64_original_file_I0.jpg

    Fun facts: sea sponges, dust mites, and protozoa are animals. Some personal hygiene measures would need to be outlawed too.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Jack D, @TWS, @Emil Nikola Richard

    Plenty of fish in the creeks and deer in the fields.

  199. @AnotherDad
    @MEH 0910


    Ethan Coen’s New Movie Has Disastrous Box Office Opening, Misses Top 5 In First Weekend
    The new Ethan Coen movie Drive-Away Dolls barely makes it into the Top 10 in its domestic opening weekend, landing at No. 8 with a paltry debut.
     
    LOL.

    Amazing these people can not figure out the obvious. Queers--I mean male queers, the word apparently has been repurposed to something or another--are viscerally disgusting, but lesbians are just boring.

    Women and their stories are interesting because of sex--their capability to make babies with a man. Therefore man-woman coupling, "who will match with and make babies with whom?"--which speaks to lineage and the future--is of some dramatic interest.

    Men can be of interest beyond that. Men make war and ergo decide the fate of nations and empires. Men break the law and other men hunt down and suppress the lawbreakers. Men sail around the world and discover new lands. Men come up with new ideas and inventions and make things that fly and go boom. Some drama.

    Women, strip away sex--the "who will she make babies with"--are rather boring. They ... talk.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Mike Tre, @Twinkie, @Looger, @Jack D, @New Dealer, @R.G. Camara, @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Corvinus

    Amazing these people can not figure out the obvious. Queers–I mean male queers, the word apparently has been repurposed to something or another–are viscerally disgusting, but lesbians are just boring.

    I read a survey some years ago, which showed that heterosexual males and females and homosexual females all found visual depictions of male homosexuality repellent, with only the homosexual males responding to it positively. But the visual depiction of female homosexuality was found to be more universally (if mildly) appealing in the survey, except by homosexual males. So, my takeaway from the survey was that homosexual males were the weirdos, the odd men out, if you will.

    Women, strip away sex–the “who will she make babies with”–are rather boring.

    I find women fascinating even without sex. First of all, I find women to be very beautiful creatures (and I’m not just talking about sexually appealing in that lustful sense). Were I an artist, I’d want to draw and paint them.

    I used to watch my girls play with dolls and animals and found their engagement with the latter utterly captivating. I guess a part of it is that I am a man, so there is much to the female nature that I find “exotic” and often baffling (sometimes frustratingly so, but other times intriguingly so too). That which I do not understand or comprehend fully I find both challenging and interesting. To me, many of my fellow men are quite predictable.

  200. @Guest007
    @JohnnyWalker123

    Trophy wives are out of style. That is one of the reasons why college educated whites do not support Trump compared to blue collar whites.

    Replies: @JohnnyWalker123

    Trophy wives are out of style.

    Definitely. In today’s world, there’s an increasing emphasis on finding a wife/girlfriend who’s an “equal partner.” Equal in age, income, educational credentials, ambitions, etc.

    The “power couple” is very much in style now, especially in the affluent class.

    Getting a beautiful young woman, by leveraging your wealth/success, is now viewed as vulgar.

  201. @Jack D
    @Hypnotoad666

    Yeah, you're probably right that it won't follow similar lines. Russia is a hopeless case now. A revolution, two world wars, 70 years of Communism and 20 years of dictatorship destroyed their human capital. Anyone with brains has either left or is dead.


    Russia’s humiliation forced its educated elites to identify its problems and recognise the need for fundamental reforms.

     

    NOPE, won't happen again.

    They saw rapid modernisation as the sole way to recover the empire’s status as a European power.

     

    NOPE, won't happen again.

    The war thus became a catalyst for reforms of Russia’s social institutions, including the abolition of serfdom and overhauls in the justice system, local self-government, education and military service.

     

    NOPE, won't happen again, either. It will just be Putin and his buddies robbing the Russian people blind for the foreseeable future. I don't see a way out of this, sadly. It's difficult for the tree of democracy to grow in a place where the soil has been so deeply soaked in blood. The Russian people are given crumbs by their masters and they are grateful that it's not a bullet to the head like before.

    Replies: @TWS, @Joe Stalin, @Hypnotoad666

    This has got to be a joke account. It’s pure monomania like The Duck but the humor is more selective.

    • Agree: BB753
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @TWS

    Jack D probably covers a wider breadth of subject matter than any other single commenter on this blog.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @TWS, @anonymous, @J.Ross, @BB753

  202. @New Dealer
    Come to think of it, I think it most plausible that the next current thing will be socially and legally enforced veganism. Trendiness, social pressure, city bans, state initiative petitions. Easier to cut off supply than punish demand. Brought to us by pretty much the same people who have imposed the recent Things.

    https://cloudfront-eu-central-1.images.arcpublishing.com/irishtimes/7MA4AEULQC5VNNQZ7HHCDK62Q4.jpg

    https://plantbasednews.org/app/uploads/2023/09/plant-based-news-vegan-billboard-ww2.jpg

    https://stories.isu.pub/98111896/images/64_original_file_I0.jpg

    Fun facts: sea sponges, dust mites, and protozoa are animals. Some personal hygiene measures would need to be outlawed too.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Jack D, @TWS, @Emil Nikola Richard

    String instrument strings and drum heads are made from animals. Also you must quit listening to music.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Emil Nikola Richard


    String instrument strings and drum heads are made from animals
     
    For the record, this is mostly not true nowadays. They're made out of metals/polymers and polymers respectively, not because modern materials necessarily sound better, but because they are more consistent, durable, weather-stable, and frequently louder. (A lot of music tech innovation is motivated by the quest for loudness.)
  203. @Hypnotoad666
    @Jack D


    Let’s hope that the aftermath follows similar lines as well (from the Wiki)
     
    The West spent a lot of blood and treasure to help prop up the Ottoman Empire. Yeah, that sounds like another winner for Democracy and Western values. But at least they got to "harm" Russia, by making them spend blood and treasure, also. I guess I can see the parallels now that you mention it.

    Irrational and emotional hatred of any country or people is not a sound basis for foreign policy. But the morons that run our foreign policy are motivated by irrational hatred of Russia and irrational love of Israel. It's pathetic.

    Replies: @Jack D, @Twinkie

    Irrational and emotional hatred of any country or people is not a sound basis for foreign policy. But the morons that run our foreign policy are motivated by irrational hatred of Russia and irrational love of Israel. It’s pathetic.

    Neither of those is irrational in context of American domestic politics (powerful Israeli lobby, et al.).

    But they are both contrary to realism in foreign policy. As Lord Palmerston said, “nations have no permanent friends or allies, only permanent interests.” From the inception, the U.S. has had three “permanent” foreign policy interests, namely:

    1. No other (at the time European) great power interference in the Western Hemisphere.
    2. Preventing the rise of another continental-scale hegemon.
    3. Freedom of the seas/unfettered international commerce.

  204. Current New Thing:

    Major Media Stylebook amendment anllows identifying a violent negro teen committing ultra-violent acts on elderly white people as a “man child,” as long as it’s a descriptive issued by the battered victim.

    https://nypost.com/2024/02/28/us-news/indiana-teacher-bob-gooding-says-school-refused-to-arrest-student-who-hit-him/

  205. @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality
    The New Thing among the masses of Americans is the growing disenchantment about the USA Thingie. Nobody can even define what the USA is anymore.

    Young White men are less likely to be suckered into defending it. There is also a growing disenchantment over the concept of universal rights. In practice, this belief was just a way to cuck White men into working for and dying for others who would never return the favor.

    Look for young White men to stop recognizing and enforcing the "rights" of others.

    Replies: @mc23, @Joe Stalin

    When invade the world has degenerated into massively inviting the world there is nothing left to defend. With open borders there is no nation. As for our armed forces perhaps, nothing has changed but the mask has dropped with the internet. Smedley Butler a Marine Corp General, wrote a book War is a Racket.

    Based on his career military experience, Butler discussed how business interests were behind US interests in foreign interventions. Now it seems Zionist neocons have replaced banana companies.

    White young men hardest hit.

    • Thanks: J.Ross
  206. @AnotherDad
    @MEH 0910


    Ethan Coen’s New Movie Has Disastrous Box Office Opening, Misses Top 5 In First Weekend
    The new Ethan Coen movie Drive-Away Dolls barely makes it into the Top 10 in its domestic opening weekend, landing at No. 8 with a paltry debut.
     
    LOL.

    Amazing these people can not figure out the obvious. Queers--I mean male queers, the word apparently has been repurposed to something or another--are viscerally disgusting, but lesbians are just boring.

    Women and their stories are interesting because of sex--their capability to make babies with a man. Therefore man-woman coupling, "who will match with and make babies with whom?"--which speaks to lineage and the future--is of some dramatic interest.

    Men can be of interest beyond that. Men make war and ergo decide the fate of nations and empires. Men break the law and other men hunt down and suppress the lawbreakers. Men sail around the world and discover new lands. Men come up with new ideas and inventions and make things that fly and go boom. Some drama.

    Women, strip away sex--the "who will she make babies with"--are rather boring. They ... talk.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Mike Tre, @Twinkie, @Looger, @Jack D, @New Dealer, @R.G. Camara, @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Corvinus

    Ethan Coen’s New Movie Has Disastrous Box Office Opening

    I heard these guys retired from movies after “Buster Scruggs” but obviously one kept going. I guess we know now who’s the talented one (Joel, the quiet one in interviews).

    Though most of their comedies bomb, even the good ones (“The Big Lebowski” theater was empty in 1998 when I went).

    As to AnotherDad’s point, I’ve noticed also that mens’ stories seem to grab all audiences more that’s for sure.

    There are a couple “womens’ stories” movies I’ve liked but without car chases, explosions etc. it’s an uphill battle.

    [MORE]

    Ghost World
    Bound
    The Tao of Steve (follows my accidental ‘formula’ for picking up women)
    Jawbreaker
    Jackie Brown
    Safety Not Guaranteed
    Colossal

  207. OT: Here’s an interesting study:

    Self-signaling in voting
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0047272724000069

    “This paper presents a two-wave survey experiment to examine the impact of self-image concerns on voting behavior. We elicit votes on a ballot initiative on animal welfare in Switzerland that spurred campaigns involving widely shared normative values. We send a message to voters about scientific evidence supporting the claim that “good-hearted people tend to be good to animals.” We interpret this message as a factor that may alter the self-signaling value linked to voting in favor of the initiative. We investigate how this message affects selection and processing of information, as well as reported voting behavior. We find that the message is effective in several ways: voters agree more with arguments in favor of the initiative, are more likely to anticipate voting in favor, and do report having voted in favor of the initiative more often.”

  208. @MEH 0910
    @anonymous

    https://www.fangoria.com/original/the-coen-brothers-reportedly-making-a-very-bloody-horror-movie/


    The Coen Brothers Reportedly Making A Very Bloody Horror Movie
    Joel and Ethan Coen have been working separately for several years but horror is bringing them back together.
    BY RYAN SCOTT · JANUARY 29, 2024
     

    The Coen Brothers have not directed a film together since 2018’s The Ballad of Buster Scruggs for Netflix. Since then, the legendary duo of Joel and Ethan have been making films separately. But fear not! The brothers are soon going to reunite behind the camera and, what’s more, it’s a horror movie that will be getting them back together. Details are currently slim, but the news comes directly from Ethan Coen.

    As reported by World of Reel, Ethan Coen and his Drive Away Dolls collaborator/co-writer Tricia Cooke recently held a Master Class conversation put on by the Tromso International Film Festival in Norway. During that conversation, Ethan confirmed that he and Joel have written a new script together, and they apparently intend to direct it in the near future. Here’s what he had to say about it:

    “It's a pure horror film, and it gets very bloody. If you like Blood Simple, I think you'll enjoy it.”
     
    [...]
    As for what the movie might be about? That, for now, remains wholly mysterious. Though Cooke did say that the script is “horribly funny.” So a dark, bloody horror/comedy directed by the Coen Brothers? That sounds pretty enticing. The only downside is that both Joel and Ethan Coen may have other projects to wrap up first before they can truly get this one off the ground.

    The report notes that Joel might have to finish another project first, but that project was not named. Joel most recently directed 2021’s The Tragedy of MacBeth. Ethan, meanwhile, has Drive Away Dolls coming out later this year, and he is also attached to direct a comedy titled Honey Don’t! that appears to be coming together quickly. So, worst-case scenario, this mysterious horror film would have to wait until those projects are in the books. Stay tuned as we’ll surely be learning more sooner rather than later.
     

    Replies: @anonymous

    Thanks. That’s great to hear.

  209. OT — Are you ready for Kazakh cinema?

    • Replies: @BB753
    @J.Ross

    At this point, anything is better than Hollywood crap.

  210. @Jack D
    @Hypnotoad666

    Yeah, you're probably right that it won't follow similar lines. Russia is a hopeless case now. A revolution, two world wars, 70 years of Communism and 20 years of dictatorship destroyed their human capital. Anyone with brains has either left or is dead.


    Russia’s humiliation forced its educated elites to identify its problems and recognise the need for fundamental reforms.

     

    NOPE, won't happen again.

    They saw rapid modernisation as the sole way to recover the empire’s status as a European power.

     

    NOPE, won't happen again.

    The war thus became a catalyst for reforms of Russia’s social institutions, including the abolition of serfdom and overhauls in the justice system, local self-government, education and military service.

     

    NOPE, won't happen again, either. It will just be Putin and his buddies robbing the Russian people blind for the foreseeable future. I don't see a way out of this, sadly. It's difficult for the tree of democracy to grow in a place where the soil has been so deeply soaked in blood. The Russian people are given crumbs by their masters and they are grateful that it's not a bullet to the head like before.

    Replies: @TWS, @Joe Stalin, @Hypnotoad666

  211. @Spud Boy
    The next big thing will be animal rights.

    Your cheeseburger will be taxed or legislated out of existence--probably in the name of climate change.

    Replies: @Chrisnonymous

    Right. The next big thing requires a victim to rally around. Polyamory and pedophilia don’t have plausible victims, especially polyamory. But animals can be victims. Combined with save the planet by eating plants ideology, it could be a winner.

  212. @J.Ross
    @Frau Katze

    Steve has focused on this. In a nutshell, becoming a woman really, really sucks in many ways, to include simple unexplained body pain, but also learning about your own relative vulnerabity, and the tranny thing offers girls an escape from unpleasantness.

    Replies: @Frau Katze, @prosa123

    In a nutshell, becoming a woman really, really sucks in many ways, to include simple unexplained body pain, but also learning about your own relative vulnerabity, and the tranny thing offers girls an escape from unpleasantness.

    I don’t get the vulnerability part. Men are much more likely to become victims of violent crime.

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @prosa123

    Girls and boys are pretty much equals (girls beating up or physically dominating boys is a thing that happens; women beating up men is either fake or fun, not a thing that really happens), so overnight you go from being pretty much the same thing as that guy over there to realizing he could rape or kill you with his bare hands and there's nothing you could do to stop him without help. This is a source of enormous resentment in women and there are many jokes about it.

    , @Frau Katze
    @prosa123


    I don’t get the vulnerability part. Men are much more likely to become victims of violent crime.
     
    Woman are physically weaker than men. If a woman ends up at the mercy of a psychopath she’s doomed.

    As a female you must try to avoid that scenario your entire life. True, most women won’t end up murdered by a psycho but the possibility is always there.

    In Canada, where handguns are uncommon, men are safer than in the US. But female disadvantage is the same.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Twinkie, @Colin Wright, @Looger

  213. @AnotherDad
    @MEH 0910


    Ethan Coen’s New Movie Has Disastrous Box Office Opening, Misses Top 5 In First Weekend
    The new Ethan Coen movie Drive-Away Dolls barely makes it into the Top 10 in its domestic opening weekend, landing at No. 8 with a paltry debut.
     
    LOL.

    Amazing these people can not figure out the obvious. Queers--I mean male queers, the word apparently has been repurposed to something or another--are viscerally disgusting, but lesbians are just boring.

    Women and their stories are interesting because of sex--their capability to make babies with a man. Therefore man-woman coupling, "who will match with and make babies with whom?"--which speaks to lineage and the future--is of some dramatic interest.

    Men can be of interest beyond that. Men make war and ergo decide the fate of nations and empires. Men break the law and other men hunt down and suppress the lawbreakers. Men sail around the world and discover new lands. Men come up with new ideas and inventions and make things that fly and go boom. Some drama.

    Women, strip away sex--the "who will she make babies with"--are rather boring. They ... talk.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Mike Tre, @Twinkie, @Looger, @Jack D, @New Dealer, @R.G. Camara, @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Corvinus

    sex–their capability to make babies with a man.

    Sex and having babies are two different things, especially in the modern world where they are quite divorced from each other. It is said that some primitive tribes don’t even make the connection between the two. Although it is said that the characteristics that men find attractive (youth, symmetry, etc.) are signals of fertility, men don’t see an attractive woman in the street and assess her child bearing capacity as if they were buying a breeding sow. If someone whispered to you that a certain beautiful woman was unable to bear children, would you be any less attracted to her? You might not want to marry her if you were interested in having a family (not everyone is) but it wouldn’t change her attractiveness.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Jack D

    An important biological reason for this disconnect is the oddly low fecundability of humans. Not only is conception only possible for a fraction of a menstrual cycle, it fails even then most of the time, even in young healthy couples. Thus, most sex does not result in pregnancy even without contraception. (One useful consequence: bastards much rarer than affairs.)

    That said, I think some men do consciously think about fertility when judging a woman's attractiveness: ever heard the expression "child-bearing hips"? It certainly wouldn't surprise me if AD is one of them.

  214. @prosa123
    @J.Ross

    In a nutshell, becoming a woman really, really sucks in many ways, to include simple unexplained body pain, but also learning about your own relative vulnerabity, and the tranny thing offers girls an escape from unpleasantness.

    I don't get the vulnerability part. Men are much more likely to become victims of violent crime.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Frau Katze

    Girls and boys are pretty much equals (girls beating up or physically dominating boys is a thing that happens; women beating up men is either fake or fun, not a thing that really happens), so overnight you go from being pretty much the same thing as that guy over there to realizing he could rape or kill you with his bare hands and there’s nothing you could do to stop him without help. This is a source of enormous resentment in women and there are many jokes about it.

  215. @prosa123
    @J.Ross

    In a nutshell, becoming a woman really, really sucks in many ways, to include simple unexplained body pain, but also learning about your own relative vulnerabity, and the tranny thing offers girls an escape from unpleasantness.

    I don't get the vulnerability part. Men are much more likely to become victims of violent crime.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Frau Katze

    I don’t get the vulnerability part. Men are much more likely to become victims of violent crime.

    Woman are physically weaker than men. If a woman ends up at the mercy of a psychopath she’s doomed.

    As a female you must try to avoid that scenario your entire life. True, most women won’t end up murdered by a psycho but the possibility is always there.

    In Canada, where handguns are uncommon, men are safer than in the US. But female disadvantage is the same.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @Frau Katze


    In Canada, where handguns are uncommon, men are safer than in the US.
     
    "In Canada, where [fill in the blank] are uncommon, men are safer than in the US."


    Handguns were far less common in the city I left than they are among my new small-town neighbors, many of whom own one or two. But somehow I feel safer out here. What's scary is all the Silverados-- if one of those hits you, you're toast. (City buses are deadly, too, but those are operated by professionals, who are sober as well.)

    Canada ranks #7 in gun ownership, while Mexico is way down at #60. Tell me you'd feel safer in Tijuana than in Victoria!


    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estimated_number_of_civilian_guns_per_capita_by_country

    Replies: @Frau Katze

    , @Twinkie
    @Frau Katze


    In Canada, where handguns are uncommon, men are safer than in the US.
     
    I can't even...
    , @Colin Wright
    @Frau Katze


    In Canada, where handguns are uncommon, men are safer than in the US. But female disadvantage is the same.
     
    If you examine the numbers, I think you'll find the difference has more to do with a paucity of blacks than with a paucity of handguns.

    We're awash in guns around here; I suspect the average male citizen must have about four -- two of which would be pistols. Seriously: it's absurd. I think Ian and Gary both have guns. My daughter has three: a Glock in 9mm, an AR-15 clone, and a pump shotgun. I have four. Frank has at least eight. I mentioned this to the guy at the gun store. He said that's nothing; he has customers with twenty. People have pistols for the car, and pistols for the house. They've got their gun, and one that's light enough for the little woman to use. There's a deer rifle, an assault rifle, and a shotgun. What do we want with all these guns?

    And yet, murder is virtually unheard of. Very few blacks, you see.

    Replies: @Frau Katze

    , @Looger
    @Frau Katze


    Woman are physically weaker than men. If a woman ends up at the mercy of a psychopath she’s doomed.

    As a female you must try to avoid that scenario your entire life. True, most women won’t end up murdered by a psycho but the possibility is always there.

    In Canada, where handguns are uncommon, men are safer than in the US. But female disadvantage is the same.
     
    And yet, in Canada, women have voted more immigrant men into the country, who then rape and murder them.

    Curious.

    I didn't understand the dynamic until my ex-wife, immigration consultant, got very angry with me because a woman was raped and murdered at Franklin Station in Calgary. As she harangued me about this I began to wonder how many of the men in the gang were from countries that she brought people in from.

    Women with political power is the scariest thing imaginable. I thought marrying a "smart woman" was a good idea - it ended up making me realize that they were given political power in order to destroy the west.

    You say women fear being killed by a psycho, ok fine I can understand that. Traditionally that meant women had chaparones. But now women want to have their cake and eat it too, they want to feel independent but still they are scared. So they vote for more "male attention" subconciously and they end up with more "psychos" (uncivilized men with zero restraint).

    It's quite the mental prisons you women have there, it'd be a shame if you got voting power and externalized your internal contradictions into a hellscape society.

    A real shame that would be.

    Replies: @Frau Katze

  216. @Anon
    @Nj Transit Commuter

    Some Jew wrote a book about white rural hate blah blah...you should read the x comments! Talk about an awakening, of course he’s crying out in pain.

    Replies: @New Dealer

    Wow!!! Now I understand what ratioed means (I hope). The post on X about the White Rural Rage book got 47oo replies and 568 likes. 8.3 ratio.

    I scrolled through first hundred replies, all negative. 4600 to go.

    ISteve, get on this.

    Hint to ethnic minority advocates: Study Dale Carnegie’s How to Win Friends and Influence People.

    • Replies: @New Dealer
    @New Dealer

    The steaming White Rural Rage post on X.

    Another metric. The original post by the author of the new Protocols of the Elders of Albion got 468 likes. The most liked negative reply (by Christopher Rufo) got 3900 likes.

    It's frightening to remember that but for Musk none of those almost 4700 replies opposing antiwhite hatred would have appeared.

    Replies: @New Dealer, @Frau Katze

    , @ScarletNumber
    @New Dealer


    Now I understand what ratioed means (I hope). The post on X about the White Rural Rage book got 47oo replies and 568 likes. 8.3 ratio.
     
    Yes, that's exactly what ratioed means, although it normally isn't that extreme, as the term is used when the number of replies merely matches the sum of likes and retweets.
  217. @Jonathan Mason
    @Franz

    The whole idea that couples must be very close together in age, preferably so that they would have been higschoolers or college students at the same time seems to be very American (US) and is much less common in other nations.

    More common in other countries is that a man establishes himself econonomically either by having a successful career or inheriting through a family business or deceased parents, and then looks for a wife who is young, energetic, and fertile to have his children.

    Men, even at the age of 70 are capable of fathering children, but women not so much so.

    Replies: @Bill Jones, @BB753, @Thea, @ben tillman, @oliver elkington

    I know in other cultures the age gaps still generally are not that big, most Muslim men marry in their early or mid twenties to women in their late teens or early 20s, in China men usually go with women or girls of a similar age, i know that in Japan it is very popular for much older men to pay large sums of money to take teenage girls to restaurants, i have heard that the government is trying to clamp down on that practice though.

  218. @Jack D
    @Hypnotoad666

    Yeah, you're probably right that it won't follow similar lines. Russia is a hopeless case now. A revolution, two world wars, 70 years of Communism and 20 years of dictatorship destroyed their human capital. Anyone with brains has either left or is dead.


    Russia’s humiliation forced its educated elites to identify its problems and recognise the need for fundamental reforms.

     

    NOPE, won't happen again.

    They saw rapid modernisation as the sole way to recover the empire’s status as a European power.

     

    NOPE, won't happen again.

    The war thus became a catalyst for reforms of Russia’s social institutions, including the abolition of serfdom and overhauls in the justice system, local self-government, education and military service.

     

    NOPE, won't happen again, either. It will just be Putin and his buddies robbing the Russian people blind for the foreseeable future. I don't see a way out of this, sadly. It's difficult for the tree of democracy to grow in a place where the soil has been so deeply soaked in blood. The Russian people are given crumbs by their masters and they are grateful that it's not a bullet to the head like before.

    Replies: @TWS, @Joe Stalin, @Hypnotoad666

    NOPE, won’t happen again, either.

    Your hatred of Russia is bizarre. But in case you hadn’t noticed they are on the rise. They are the fastest growing economy in Europe while the EU stagnates year after year. They have diversified their economy in response to sanctions and are leading the BRICs in a global resistance to idiot U.S. foreign policy.

    I have no idea why people like you and Victoria Nuland want to make Russia the enemy, but your efforts to “weaken” it have backfired spectaculary.

    • Agree: Mark G.
    • LOL: Peter Akuleyev
    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @Hypnotoad666

    Really? You don't know?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGBG8mCt59s

    , @Colin Wright
    @Hypnotoad666


    Your hatred of Russia is bizarre...
     
    Notice that Frau Katze signs off on it as well.

    And yet, truth be told, while the Russians have done horrible things to many groups, Jews have never been among their especial victims. So what's up?

    Replies: @SFG

    , @Anonymous
    @Hypnotoad666

    A couple of years ago, he used to spit out verbatim bile and venom at Ukrainians, for deeply personal reasons, do doubt.
    Now, in a very odd damascene conversion, spinning on a sixpence, Ukrainians are now the sanctified good guys, and the bile, invective and foul smelling spittle is thrown at the Russians.

    A truly odd case.

    Replies: @res

    , @Peter Akuleyev
    @Hypnotoad666

    It's simply insane to say Russia is "on the rise". Yes, the economy is overheating due to military spending but nothing productive is happening there and the second the war ends that economy will collapse into hyperinflation. We've seen this story many times in many countries.

    The main, cynical, reason for Europeans to attack Russia now is that Russia is extraordinarily weak at the moment and now is the time to take advantage of that before China can. Much like European powers raced to carve up the dying Ottoman Empire, there is a battle between the West, China and increasingly India to dominate Russia. Putin is fighting a rearguard action but destroying the Russian military and the Russian economy in the process.

    Replies: @Jack D, @Anonymous

  219. @Hypnotoad666
    @Jack D


    NOPE, won’t happen again, either.
     
    Your hatred of Russia is bizarre. But in case you hadn't noticed they are on the rise. They are the fastest growing economy in Europe while the EU stagnates year after year. They have diversified their economy in response to sanctions and are leading the BRICs in a global resistance to idiot U.S. foreign policy.

    I have no idea why people like you and Victoria Nuland want to make Russia the enemy, but your efforts to "weaken" it have backfired spectaculary.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Colin Wright, @Anonymous, @Peter Akuleyev

    Really? You don’t know?

  220. @AnotherDad
    @MEH 0910


    Ethan Coen’s New Movie Has Disastrous Box Office Opening, Misses Top 5 In First Weekend
    The new Ethan Coen movie Drive-Away Dolls barely makes it into the Top 10 in its domestic opening weekend, landing at No. 8 with a paltry debut.
     
    LOL.

    Amazing these people can not figure out the obvious. Queers--I mean male queers, the word apparently has been repurposed to something or another--are viscerally disgusting, but lesbians are just boring.

    Women and their stories are interesting because of sex--their capability to make babies with a man. Therefore man-woman coupling, "who will match with and make babies with whom?"--which speaks to lineage and the future--is of some dramatic interest.

    Men can be of interest beyond that. Men make war and ergo decide the fate of nations and empires. Men break the law and other men hunt down and suppress the lawbreakers. Men sail around the world and discover new lands. Men come up with new ideas and inventions and make things that fly and go boom. Some drama.

    Women, strip away sex--the "who will she make babies with"--are rather boring. They ... talk.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Mike Tre, @Twinkie, @Looger, @Jack D, @New Dealer, @R.G. Camara, @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Corvinus

    I started liking girls a lot in the first grade, for instance, elusive Alice. Definitely not because I wanted to be a girl. And as a man I like women a lot.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @New Dealer


    I started liking girls a lot in the first grade
     
    Kindergarten for me. The "latency period" may be common, but not universal. I saw girls as like Carpenters or Barry Manilow records, mostly annoying, but with some wonderful exceptions that should be embraced.

    Even Dennis the Menace and friends Joey, Tommy, and Dewey had their Gina.

    (Note to any Brits reading: our Dennis, not yours. Yours is irredeemable.)


    https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/menace/images/1/17/IMG_20211203_045119.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20211203113659
  221. Anonymous[115] • Disclaimer says:
    @Peter Akuleyev

    Many on the right argued that it had to be pedophilia, mostly because that grossed them out the most.
     
    There is a consensus on the left, and even mainstream America, that pedophiles are by nature right wing. And indeed, pretty much every case of man on boy pedophilia that gets publicity tends to be conservative male authority figures (priests, evangelicals, Boy Scout leaders, football coaches, politicians). This plays into the left wing narrative that man-on-boy pedophilia is the product of closeting homosexuals and making them ashamed of their true urges. The fact that conservatives unvariably come out in droves to defend creeps like Sandusky, Frank Houston or the Catholic Church just further associates pedophilia with the right-wing in the minds of most Americans.

    The stereotypical lefty pedophile is usually a creepy loser who uses his authority to pick up and "groom" young women. Biden certainly seems like someone who could be in that box. Mike Pence is the kind of weirdo conservative who would surprise no one if it turned out he liked diddling 9 year old boys in the shower.

    Replies: @LG5, @Anonymous

    Priests, pedophilic or otherwise, aren’t necessarily conservative. This was especially true in the past when the notorious scandals happened. I had a pedophile priest growing up (busted for porn: hopefully he never did anything in person.) His homilies were fairly left-coded, at least by 2000s standards: lots about helping the global poor, anti-consumerism, nonviolence, etc.

    And regarding Sandusky:

    https://www.framingpaterno.com/jerry-sanduskys-request-john-ziegler-summarizes-why-he-became-convinced-alleged-child-abusers-innoce

  222. @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality
    The New Thing among the masses of Americans is the growing disenchantment about the USA Thingie. Nobody can even define what the USA is anymore.

    Young White men are less likely to be suckered into defending it. There is also a growing disenchantment over the concept of universal rights. In practice, this belief was just a way to cuck White men into working for and dying for others who would never return the favor.

    Look for young White men to stop recognizing and enforcing the "rights" of others.

    Replies: @mc23, @Joe Stalin

    In practice, this belief was just a way to cuck White men into working for and dying for others who would never return the favor.

  223. @Frau Katze
    @Mike Tre


    “with catastrophic consequences for impressionable and moody young girls.”

    Males are 2-4 times more likely to “transition” than females.
     
    It does seem that among adults, M > F is the most popular.

    But there’s a fad going around young teen girls about being trans.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Reg Cæsar

    But there’s a fad going around young teen girls about being trans.

    Faddism [that was just “autocorrected” to “fascism”!] is just being conformist in the short term. But this is extreme, young women’s desire for conformity overrides their natural female desire for caution. This used to be expressed in boyfriends that shocked mother. But mother, and more so father, still had a chance to correct this. Tattoos, let alone more extreme mutilations, are irreversible.

    In a way, it’s elder abuse. Carrie Gress compares it to chapucismo, the intentional destruction of great art works, and links it to adolescent fashion:

    It’s human nature that, as women, we’re susceptible to trends. It’s seen as a virtue to be breezily trendy or to look as if you stepped out of a fashion magazine. But trends aren’t limited to fabric colors and hairstyles. They extend deeply into patterns of thought and behavior.

    One well-documented current trend – a sort of social contagion among high-school and college women – is to venture into the world of testosterone injections and gender-fluidity.

    https://www.thecatholicthing.org/2021/03/09/time-for-a-restoration-of-womens-glory/

    • Thanks: Frau Katze
  224. As once again we are seemingly knocking on the door of nuclear annihilation, perhaps digging that shelter deep and following Dr. Strangelove’s advice.

  225. @Jack D
    @deep anonymous

    The case at hand is a state criminal prosecution of 3rd parties who (allegedly) stole and sold song manuscripts belonging to Henley. Henley's propensity to have sex with underage whores (she LOOKED like she was over 18!) has zippo to do with the case at hand. Completely irrelevant. The defense counsel just wants to make Henley unsympathetic to the jury. I really don't know why the judge allowed it. There are some really crap judges out there. As our society has declined so too has the quality of some judges.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @deep anonymous

    Thanks for the explanation. So Henley isn’t a defendant, and as you say, his sexual picadilloes are entirely irrelevant to the case.

    I can vouch for your comment about the declining quality of some judges. I’d better not say more because of my obligation of confidentiality, but I have some war stories.

  226. Anonymous[256] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jack D
    @AnotherDad


    sex–their capability to make babies with a man.
     
    Sex and having babies are two different things, especially in the modern world where they are quite divorced from each other. It is said that some primitive tribes don't even make the connection between the two. Although it is said that the characteristics that men find attractive (youth, symmetry, etc.) are signals of fertility, men don't see an attractive woman in the street and assess her child bearing capacity as if they were buying a breeding sow. If someone whispered to you that a certain beautiful woman was unable to bear children, would you be any less attracted to her? You might not want to marry her if you were interested in having a family (not everyone is) but it wouldn't change her attractiveness.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    An important biological reason for this disconnect is the oddly low fecundability of humans. Not only is conception only possible for a fraction of a menstrual cycle, it fails even then most of the time, even in young healthy couples. Thus, most sex does not result in pregnancy even without contraception. (One useful consequence: bastards much rarer than affairs.)

    That said, I think some men do consciously think about fertility when judging a woman’s attractiveness: ever heard the expression “child-bearing hips”? It certainly wouldn’t surprise me if AD is one of them.

  227. @New Dealer
    @AnotherDad

    I started liking girls a lot in the first grade, for instance, elusive Alice. Definitely not because I wanted to be a girl. And as a man I like women a lot.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    I started liking girls a lot in the first grade

    Kindergarten for me. The “latency period” may be common, but not universal. I saw girls as like Carpenters or Barry Manilow records, mostly annoying, but with some wonderful exceptions that should be embraced.

    Even Dennis the Menace and friends Joey, Tommy, and Dewey had their Gina.

    (Note to any Brits reading: our Dennis, not yours. Yours is irredeemable.)

    https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/menace/images/1/17/IMG_20211203_045119.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20211203113659

  228. @res
    @Stan Adams

    Some followup on your last sentence. It is interesting to see the time progression.

    1992 the original controversy.
    https://www.deseret.com/1992/9/14/19004537/bergen-was-amused-then-offended-by-quayle/

    But note her first sentence here.


    Bergen says a lot of thought went into the decision to have Murphy become a single mother. "I myself, as a parent, believe the ideal is you have a two-parent family. I'm the last person to think fathers are obsolete," she said. But, "I think it was absolutely the right decision to have the baby. Absolutely. For Murphy and the show."
     
    6/23/1998 CB doubles down.
    https://www.nytimes.com/1998/06/23/opinion/l-murphy-brown-s-values-543110.html

    Though a bit hard to reconcile that with this from 7/27/98.
    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/magazine/1727756/murphy-brown-redux/

    2002 CB more conciliatory.
    https://www.sun-sentinel.com/2002/07/12/quayles-ok-bergen-admits/

    5/25/2012 The WaPo (of all places) says Quayle was right.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/20-years-later-it-turns-out-dan-quayle-was-right-about-murphy-brown-and-unmarried-moms/2012/05/25/gJQAsNCJqU_story.html

    This 2018 article recaptures the history including a 2012 quote from CB.
    https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/uh-oh-immigration-hawks-are-underwhelmed-white-houses-proposal/

    By 2012, Bergen declared, “I never have really said much about the whole episode, which was endless. But his speech was a perfectly intelligent speech about fathers not being dispensable and nobody agreed with that more than I did.”
     

    Replies: @Stan Adams, @ScarletNumber

    But his speech was a perfectly intelligent speech about fathers not being dispensable and nobody agreed with that more than I did

    The unstated irony of this statement is that Bergen had a very famous father. Edgar and Candice were once the most famous father/daughter pairing in Hollywood, although I do think they were eventually surpassed by Jon Voight and his daughter Angelina.

    A greater overarching point is that Democrats have the habit of demonizing Republicans during the election then many years later when it doesn’t matter will praise the same individual Republicans as being model statesmen, e.g. Dan Quayle (as well as Bush 41), John McCain, Mitt Romney

  229. @New Dealer
    @Anon

    Wow!!! Now I understand what ratioed means (I hope). The post on X about the White Rural Rage book got 47oo replies and 568 likes. 8.3 ratio.

    I scrolled through first hundred replies, all negative. 4600 to go.

    ISteve, get on this.

    Hint to ethnic minority advocates: Study Dale Carnegie's How to Win Friends and Influence People.

    Replies: @New Dealer, @ScarletNumber

    The steaming White Rural Rage post on X.

    Another metric. The original post by the author of the new Protocols of the Elders of Albion got 468 likes. The most liked negative reply (by Christopher Rufo) got 3900 likes.

    It’s frightening to remember that but for Musk none of those almost 4700 replies opposing antiwhite hatred would have appeared.

    • Replies: @New Dealer
    @New Dealer

    I misread it. The most liked negative reply to the Protocols of the Elders of Albion got 5700 likes compared to 468 for the original post. 12 ratio.

    I was unable to quickly find a source listing highest ratios in twitter history. Anyone?

    , @Frau Katze
    @New Dealer


    Protocols of the Elders of Albion
     
    Hilarious!

    Replies: @res

  230. @Frau Katze
    @prosa123


    I don’t get the vulnerability part. Men are much more likely to become victims of violent crime.
     
    Woman are physically weaker than men. If a woman ends up at the mercy of a psychopath she’s doomed.

    As a female you must try to avoid that scenario your entire life. True, most women won’t end up murdered by a psycho but the possibility is always there.

    In Canada, where handguns are uncommon, men are safer than in the US. But female disadvantage is the same.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Twinkie, @Colin Wright, @Looger

    In Canada, where handguns are uncommon, men are safer than in the US.

    “In Canada, where [fill in the blank] are uncommon, men are safer than in the US.”

    Handguns were far less common in the city I left than they are among my new small-town neighbors, many of whom own one or two. But somehow I feel safer out here. What’s scary is all the Silverados– if one of those hits you, you’re toast. (City buses are deadly, too, but those are operated by professionals, who are sober as well.)

    Canada ranks #7 in gun ownership, while Mexico is way down at #60. Tell me you’d feel safer in Tijuana than in Victoria!

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estimated_number_of_civilian_guns_per_capita_by_country

    • Replies: @Frau Katze
    @Reg Cæsar

    Hunting rifles are very common in Canada. Handguns, much less.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

  231. @New Dealer
    @New Dealer

    The steaming White Rural Rage post on X.

    Another metric. The original post by the author of the new Protocols of the Elders of Albion got 468 likes. The most liked negative reply (by Christopher Rufo) got 3900 likes.

    It's frightening to remember that but for Musk none of those almost 4700 replies opposing antiwhite hatred would have appeared.

    Replies: @New Dealer, @Frau Katze

    I misread it. The most liked negative reply to the Protocols of the Elders of Albion got 5700 likes compared to 468 for the original post. 12 ratio.

    I was unable to quickly find a source listing highest ratios in twitter history. Anyone?

  232. @The Anti-Gnostic
    @ScarletNumber

    I think the incidence might be higher. Recall that at one point the top three 400M runners in the world were all African men pretending to be women. Then there's the hulking Brittney Griner, who genuinely comes across as a California surfer dude who posts at iSteve.

    We also could be talking about different phenomena. Anecdotally, androgen uptake issues seem more prevalent among blacks with more RuPauls with definite gay voice and mannerisms versus the typical former athlete/PhD /Navy SEAL white tranny. (Caitlyn Jenner walks, talks and plays golf exactly like the elderly retired decathlete he is.)

    Replies: @Guest007, @ScarletNumber

    We also could be talking about different phenomena

    We are. The examples you cite are natural-born women who happen to have an abnormally large amount of testosterone. As stated by Peter D. Bredon, black women in their natural state already have a lot of masculine qualities so a formal transition would be superfluous. I wouldn’t want to take on Brittney Griner in a fight, but that doesn’t mean she was born with a penis.

    Shaunae Miller, a Jamaican who is the current Olympic 400m champion*, displays a lack of traditional femininity but is married to an Estonian man and she had his son in April, so I would say she qualifies as a natural born woman.

    Anyway, I stand by my original point that formal transitioning happens less among blacks than it does in any other race. I don’t know if statistics are kept on the subject, but I would also think that formal transitioning happens less in Africa than it does in any other continent.

    * In another iSteve topic, the current record holder in this event is an East German who set the record in 1985.

  233. As Thomas Friedman says today in his NY Times column, Israel is losing
    its greatest asset: acceptance. The fact that the Israeli Jews (with U.S.
    complicity) have turned Gaza into a slaughterhouse of women and
    children will be remembered for hundreds of years, and will have
    worldwide repercussions. Fewer Americans will vote for Jewish
    politicians. Fewer will watch Hollywood movies and TV shows
    (viewership levels are already in massive decline). At universities
    Jews are already being replaced by East Asians. As a result, Jews
    will find it harder to get the kind of jobs they’ve been used to, and more
    will hide their identity (fewer will be willing to go through life with
    names like Shapiro or Epstein).

    Fewer people will take the Old Testament seriously. After all, Netanyahu
    was quoting the Book of Deuteronomy to justify his savage strategy in
    Gaza. As a result, fewer people will become Evangelicals, and the U.S.
    will no longer have televangelists like Billy Graham, Pat Robertson,
    or John Hagee. Since the Evangelicals are the only Americans (in
    addition to Jews) who are passionate about Israel, fewer Americans
    will be willing to die in Middle-Eastern wars. Mainline Protestants
    have been in free fall since the ‘60s but the Catholics will be less
    affected since they depend on Tradition as much as the Bible.

    • Replies: @Locutor
    @Anon 2


    Mainline Protestants have been in freefall since the ’60s...
     
    So are Catholics. They blew up their church in the '60s, Vatican II, and weird Pope Francis is trying to finish the job.

    Replies: @Anon 2

  234. @Franz
    No, polyamory can't be a thing.

    I've been sniffing new prudishness coming on fast. The whole feeling of ick for the 40-year-old guy hitting on a twenty-something female itself doesn't gross anyone out. It's an opportunity to register disgust for complicated sexual situations.

    In the 1970s for a brief time and thanks to the Jesus Freaks, a New Chastity was going around. They call it something different every time... this time it's starting in odd places like Men Going Their Own Way. In the seventies, it was Joyce Maynard calling all men pigs. But the same tune all the same.

    Replies: @Jonathan Mason, @Ebony Obelisk

    If you’re a 30 year old cos bet white male and you’re it harried have multiple children age height six fighters then you are a lowers

    • Agree: Adam Smith
    • Replies: @kaganovitch
    @Ebony Obelisk


    If you’re a 30 year old cos bet white male and you’re it harried have multiple children age height six fighters then you are a lowers
     
    Well said!

    Replies: @res

    , @Je Suis Omar Mateen
    @Ebony Obelisk

    "If you’re a 30 year old cos bet white male and you’re it harried have multiple children age height six fighters then you are a lowers"

    I've been telling my mother this exact same thing for many decades.

  235. @SFG
    @MEH 0910

    I can't figure out whether to envy or pity Mr. Coen (is she forcing him to look on while she sleeps around? are they enjoying four-person orgies?), but I'm definitely thinking: don't try this at home.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Barnard, @Reg Cæsar

    I can’t figure out whether to envy or pity Mr. Coen (is she forcing him to look on while she sleeps around? are they enjoying four-person orgies?)

    To quote Ethan’s slightly older childhood neighbor Al Franken in One More Saturday Night, he’s a lesbian trapped in the body of a man.

  236. @Frau Katze
    @prosa123


    I don’t get the vulnerability part. Men are much more likely to become victims of violent crime.
     
    Woman are physically weaker than men. If a woman ends up at the mercy of a psychopath she’s doomed.

    As a female you must try to avoid that scenario your entire life. True, most women won’t end up murdered by a psycho but the possibility is always there.

    In Canada, where handguns are uncommon, men are safer than in the US. But female disadvantage is the same.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Twinkie, @Colin Wright, @Looger

    In Canada, where handguns are uncommon, men are safer than in the US.

    I can’t even…

  237. @J.Ross
    @New Dealer

    Heinlein proposed a system of polyamory which would exploit specialization: one person's great with kids, one person's a great cook, one person ensures that the can opener doesn't go walkies, one person's good with money and does everyone's taxes.

    Replies: @njguy73

    Heinlein proposed a system of polyamory which would exploit specialization: one person’s great with kids, one person’s a great cook, one person ensures that the can opener doesn’t go walkies, one person’s good with money and does everyone’s taxes.

    In a short, a spouse-by-committee.

    And didn’t some Heinlein character say that specializtion was for insects? That a human should be able to butcher a hog, design a ship, cook a tasty meal, fight courageously, and die gallantly?

    • Replies: @SFG
    @njguy73

    Heinlein doesn’t really fit into our modern culture war left and right, and he didn’t in his own era either. As a libertarian militarist macho geek polyamorist, well, he wasn’t really anyone’s bag. His wife was apparently a WAC and engineer who turned him right on economics.

    Probably as a successful sci-fi writer he was able to get one of these libertarian horny nerd chicks all the geeks fantasize about (IRL most of them are insufferably woke). You can kind of see the same thing with Geoffrey Miller and Diana Fleischman. I genuinely can’t think of any other examples, and there’s a reason-it’s rare.

  238. For example, the woke are increasingly disgusted by the thought of a 35-year-old man marrying a 25-year-old woman (presumably, a trend driven by all the single 35-year-old women fearing being permanently left on the shelf by single 35-year-old men).

    This is an emerging division between the woke and those of us who haven’t kept up. In Chile, my wife was disconcerted that the infant a sixty-something year old man was holding was his son. Around here, I’ve heard recent arrivals reporting with horror examples of middle-aged or even elderly men with young wives.

    And yet, in most times and most places, it’s been fairly usual for a man to be ten or twenty years older than his wife. Not mandatory — but not cause for concern either. For an extreme example, look up Ferdinand de Lesseps. More ordinarily, consider Grover Cleveland and his wife. Grover Cleveland was 49 when he married Frances Folsom, 21. The wedding was held in the White House.

    The Romans (at some point in their long history) held that a man should wait until his early thirties to wed; the wife should be eleven.

    Perhaps that’s a bit extreme.

    • Replies: @William Badwhite
    @Colin Wright


    More ordinarily, consider Grover Cleveland and his wife. Grover Cleveland was 49 when he married Frances Folsom, 21. The wedding was held in the White House.
     
    Robert E. Lee's corps commander James Longstreet married his 2nd wife when he was 76 and she was 34. She lived long enough to work at a B29 plant near Atlanta during WW2.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_Dortch_Longstreet

    Agree: Johann Ricke
  239. https://www.businessinsider.com/stephen-miller-racist-hysteria-blocked-help-afghans-ex-pence-adviser-2021-8

    A former national security official blamed the Trump administration and former Trump adviser Stephen Miller’s “racist hysteria” for impeding the visa application process for Afghans who worked with the US.

    Olivia Troye worked as the homeland security and counterterrorism adviser to Vice President Mike Pence. In a Twitter thread Friday, she blasted the Trump administration for its handling of the Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) programs that provide a path to US residency for locals who worked with the US government in Afghanistan.

    “There were cabinet mtgs about this during the Trump Admin where Stephen Miller would peddle his racist hysteria about Iraq & Afghanistan. He & his enablers across gov’t would undermine anyone who worked on solving the SIV issue by devastating the system at DHS & State,” Troye wrote.

  240. @Frau Katze
    @prosa123


    I don’t get the vulnerability part. Men are much more likely to become victims of violent crime.
     
    Woman are physically weaker than men. If a woman ends up at the mercy of a psychopath she’s doomed.

    As a female you must try to avoid that scenario your entire life. True, most women won’t end up murdered by a psycho but the possibility is always there.

    In Canada, where handguns are uncommon, men are safer than in the US. But female disadvantage is the same.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Twinkie, @Colin Wright, @Looger

    In Canada, where handguns are uncommon, men are safer than in the US. But female disadvantage is the same.

    If you examine the numbers, I think you’ll find the difference has more to do with a paucity of blacks than with a paucity of handguns.

    We’re awash in guns around here; I suspect the average male citizen must have about four — two of which would be pistols. Seriously: it’s absurd. I think Ian and Gary both have guns. My daughter has three: a Glock in 9mm, an AR-15 clone, and a pump shotgun. I have four. Frank has at least eight. I mentioned this to the guy at the gun store. He said that’s nothing; he has customers with twenty. People have pistols for the car, and pistols for the house. They’ve got their gun, and one that’s light enough for the little woman to use. There’s a deer rifle, an assault rifle, and a shotgun. What do we want with all these guns?

    And yet, murder is virtually unheard of. Very few blacks, you see.

    • Replies: @Frau Katze
    @Colin Wright


    If you examine the numbers, I think you’ll find the difference has more to do with a paucity of blacks than with a paucity of handguns.
     
    OK. Fortunately I have no experience living around blacks.
  241. @BB753
    @Dutch Boy

    Well, I'd rather marry a straight Mexican or Asian woman than an ugly white lesbian. Maybe Cohen thought marrying any shiksa, even a lesbian one, was better than celibacy or marrying a Jewish woman.

    Replies: @SFG, @R.G. Camara

    Maybe Cohen thought marrying any shiksa, even a lesbian one, was better than celibacy or marrying a Jewish woman.

    He didn’t want his kids to be inbred anymore, so married out.

    • Agree: BB753
  242. @New Dealer
    @Anon

    Wow!!! Now I understand what ratioed means (I hope). The post on X about the White Rural Rage book got 47oo replies and 568 likes. 8.3 ratio.

    I scrolled through first hundred replies, all negative. 4600 to go.

    ISteve, get on this.

    Hint to ethnic minority advocates: Study Dale Carnegie's How to Win Friends and Influence People.

    Replies: @New Dealer, @ScarletNumber

    Now I understand what ratioed means (I hope). The post on X about the White Rural Rage book got 47oo replies and 568 likes. 8.3 ratio.

    Yes, that’s exactly what ratioed means, although it normally isn’t that extreme, as the term is used when the number of replies merely matches the sum of likes and retweets.

  243. Vasectomy, self sterilization and the “child free” lifestyle is the most promoted bullshit I have seen in recent years.

    • Agree: R.G. Camara
  244. @Hypnotoad666
    @Jack D


    NOPE, won’t happen again, either.
     
    Your hatred of Russia is bizarre. But in case you hadn't noticed they are on the rise. They are the fastest growing economy in Europe while the EU stagnates year after year. They have diversified their economy in response to sanctions and are leading the BRICs in a global resistance to idiot U.S. foreign policy.

    I have no idea why people like you and Victoria Nuland want to make Russia the enemy, but your efforts to "weaken" it have backfired spectaculary.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Colin Wright, @Anonymous, @Peter Akuleyev

    Your hatred of Russia is bizarre…

    Notice that Frau Katze signs off on it as well.

    And yet, truth be told, while the Russians have done horrible things to many groups, Jews have never been among their especial victims. So what’s up?

    • Agree: Gordo
    • Troll: R.G. Camara
    • Replies: @SFG
    @Colin Wright

    Nah, there were plenty of pogroms jn Czarist Russia. It’s been adduced here as a cause of Jewish Russophobia, which I guess I could buy, mostly on account of seeing Fiddler on the Riof as a kid.

    I sided with Ukraine initially but at this point think they’ve probably fought hard enough to keep most of their country and should probably let Putin have the eastern strip full of Russians. Enough dead Ukrainians and Russians already, this has turned into a WW1-style war of attrition where nothing is happening except lots of dead white boys. End it already.

    I have been quiet on this issue mostly because I don’t have that strong sympathies for either side; I think Putin is at fault for starting the war (and yes, I agree we pushed him to this point), but I am not particularly eager to see him humiliated-indeed, it is counterproductive. Always better to give your enemy a way to save face. Putin tells everyone he regathered the Russian people, the Ukrainians repelled the Russian invasion, everyone goes home to their borscht.

    Our leaders really ought to invest in an XBox and play Crusader Kings 2 or Three Kingdoms 15 or something instead of doing it with real people.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Colin Wright, @HA

  245. @AnotherDad
    @MEH 0910


    Ethan Coen’s New Movie Has Disastrous Box Office Opening, Misses Top 5 In First Weekend
    The new Ethan Coen movie Drive-Away Dolls barely makes it into the Top 10 in its domestic opening weekend, landing at No. 8 with a paltry debut.
     
    LOL.

    Amazing these people can not figure out the obvious. Queers--I mean male queers, the word apparently has been repurposed to something or another--are viscerally disgusting, but lesbians are just boring.

    Women and their stories are interesting because of sex--their capability to make babies with a man. Therefore man-woman coupling, "who will match with and make babies with whom?"--which speaks to lineage and the future--is of some dramatic interest.

    Men can be of interest beyond that. Men make war and ergo decide the fate of nations and empires. Men break the law and other men hunt down and suppress the lawbreakers. Men sail around the world and discover new lands. Men come up with new ideas and inventions and make things that fly and go boom. Some drama.

    Women, strip away sex--the "who will she make babies with"--are rather boring. They ... talk.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Mike Tre, @Twinkie, @Looger, @Jack D, @New Dealer, @R.G. Camara, @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Corvinus

    Lesbian stories are always some kind of boring psychodrama, fee-fees, and long monologues with any sex being subdued or not shown, as per Lesbian Bed Death. Straight males, if not titillated, find them either mind-numbing or hilariously awful. Perhaps the best of the lot was Fried Green Tomatoes, which smartly took out explicit lesbianism of the book and emphasized the older straight woman’s story (Kathy Bates at her best) and only had the lesbianism implied through a weird food fight.

    For a while, Showtime tried to “correct” this lesbian-story-stereotype with the hilariously bad but long-lasting lesbian show The L Word, which made a point of showing the females (who were all name actresses, putting in their dues for the Lavender mafia normalization movement) constantly having sex with one another. It was pretty hilariously awful, especially since the rest of the show was…boring psychodrama, fee-fees, and long monologues. See also the current entry into this lesbian-correction genre, Orange is the New Black.

    Straight males intuitively understand that lesbianism is just a female cope when they are too ugly/too broken/too old to get a man or else can’t find a strong enough man around and some aggressive ugly butch pushes themselves on them. As the expression goes, there aren’t any lesbians, there’re are just women who haven’t met the right man yet.

  246. @Intelligent Dasein

    with computer nerds who lack the gene for sexual jealousy demanding “polyamory”
     
    There is not a gene for sexual jealousy. That is a very simplistic and erroneous conception of what genetics is about, even by modern biology's own lights. I expect as much from HBDers, but this is truly "Lance Welton" levels of scientific illiteracy. I will be very telling of the characters of the others on this board if nobody else objects to this, so let's wait and see what happens.

    Replies: @kaganovitch

    I will be very telling of the characters of the others on this board if nobody else objects to this, so let’s wait and see what happens.

    Who will you be telling?

    • LOL: Chrisnonymous
  247. @personfellowindividual
    I'm down for cannibalism, bestiality, necrophilia, pederasty, and coprophilia. Those are all things that trigger extreme disgust, and the Left seems to have this need to cause offense in normal people while calling it a 'phobia'. The trick is introducing these horrors gradually enough to make them acceptable to their own kind first. First, they'll have to make the extreme perverts in their ranks appear to be sympathetic victims rather than sick fetishists and lunatics.

    Replies: @Almost Missouri

    I’m down for cannibalism

    Well, they are putting cannibalism on deck:

    https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg26134783-600-is-it-time-for-a-more-subtle-view-on-the-ultimate-taboo-cannibalism/

    Is it time for a more subtle view on the ultimate taboo: cannibalism?
    New archaeological evidence shows that ancient humans ate each other surprisingly often – sometimes for compassionate reasons. The finds give us an opportunity to reassess our views on the practice

    14 February 2024 .

    Valentine’s Day!

    Ethically, cannibalism poses fewer issues than you might imagine. If a body can be bequeathed with consent to medical science, why can’t it be left to feed the hungry? Our aversion has been explained in various ways. Perhaps it is down to the fact that, in Western religious traditions, bodies are seen as the seat of the soul and have a whiff of the sacred. Or maybe it is culturally ingrained, with roots in early modern colonialism, when racist stereotypes of the cannibal were concocted to justify subjugation. These came to represent the “other” to Western societies – and revulsion towards cannibalism became a tenet of their moral conscience.

    Cannibalismphobia is racism!

    A slew of recent archaeological discoveries is now further complicating how we think about human cannibalism. Researchers have unearthed evidence suggesting that our hominin ancestors ate each other surprisingly often. What’s more, it seems that they weren’t always doing so for the reasons you might expect – for sustenance or to compete against and intimidate rivals – but often as funerary rituals to honour their dead.

    Like it or not, then, cannibalism is an important part of our story. This isn’t to say that we should change our attitudes towards it. But understanding its deep roots might shift our perspective on the few cultures that still practise cannibalism today, albeit only occasionally, such as the Aghori, a Hindu ascetic sect in India that does it in pursuit of transcendence. Above all, these discoveries invite us to reconsider our revulsion to cannibalism in the context of our evolutionary past

    “You vill liv in ze pod. You vill eat ze kadavers!”

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Almost Missouri

    Wow, what a terrible "article," devoid of content. Who reads this garbage and feels like they actually learned anything about the world?

    Replies: @Almost Missouri

    , @Wielgus
    @Almost Missouri

    I guess normalising LGBT is not transgressive enough. It's "long pig" time...

    Replies: @deep anonymous

  248. Anonymous[256] • Disclaimer says:
    @Emil Nikola Richard
    @New Dealer

    String instrument strings and drum heads are made from animals. Also you must quit listening to music.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    String instrument strings and drum heads are made from animals

    For the record, this is mostly not true nowadays. They’re made out of metals/polymers and polymers respectively, not because modern materials necessarily sound better, but because they are more consistent, durable, weather-stable, and frequently louder. (A lot of music tech innovation is motivated by the quest for loudness.)

  249. @Ebony Obelisk
    @Franz

    If you’re a 30 year old cos bet white male and you’re it harried have multiple children age height six fighters then you are a lowers

    Replies: @kaganovitch, @Je Suis Omar Mateen

    If you’re a 30 year old cos bet white male and you’re it harried have multiple children age height six fighters then you are a lowers

    Well said!

    • Replies: @res
    @kaganovitch

    EO is at zir best when unintelligible.

  250. @TWS
    @Jack D

    This has got to be a joke account. It's pure monomania like The Duck but the humor is more selective.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    Jack D probably covers a wider breadth of subject matter than any other single commenter on this blog.

    • Agree: bomag, Frau Katze
    • Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Anonymous

    "Jack D probably covers a wider breadth of subject matter than any other single commenter on this blog."

    In all likelihood, Jack D is actually a team of 16 Jewish grad students sitting on the internet all day long, doing their IDF military service as a psy-ops team in an underground bunker in Haifa.

    Replies: @deep anonymous

    , @TWS
    @Anonymous

    But there's always and only one question on his plate, "Is it good for the neocons?"*


    *You thought I was going to say, "Jews" didn't you?😂

    Replies: @Mike Tre

    , @anonymous
    @Anonymous


    Jack D probably covers a wider breadth of subject matter than any other single commenter on this blog.
     
    He is a greater content lifter than any other single commenter on this blog. Not only does he copy from wikipedia but from various publications without attribution. For example, when the US began supplying the Javelin to Ukraine, the Financial Times published an article explaining how it works. Jack D spent a lot of effort rewriting that article and posting it here as his own comment. About that time, when an Su-25 was shot down and video of the pilot ejecting was posted on Twitter, Jack D scraped the comment thread and rewrote it as a comment he posted here.
    About then I began ignoring hist posts but I'm sure he has continued to do that as he has always done. He has even scraped and rewrote content I've published elsewhere about my own profession and presented it as his own. Why he would expend so much effort just to make comments on Sailer's blog I can't imagine.
    He must have extreme self-esteem issues, or perhaps have a gigantic ego that makes him so annoying in life that no one wants to associate with him, so he comes to this blog because his comments don't get blocked and he can strut and preen to his heart's desire.
    Enjoy his posts if you like, but keep in mind that when he writes -- or rewrites -- he often misunderstands or gets things wrong. So whether he is posting about pot-bellied stoves, Iraqi air defenses in the Iraq War, movie studios in Hollywood or learning foreign languages, he doesn't know what he is talking about and is just another time-wasting blowhard.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @New Dealer, @Mike Tre, @J.Ross, @Bernard

    , @J.Ross
    @Anonymous

    That's not purely an advantage. He is good on subjects he understands, but predictable and wildly wrong on certain personal bugbears. Dr Zaius is very similar, but they disagree heatedly sometimes.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    , @BB753
    @Anonymous

    That's Wikipedia for you!

  251. @Almost Missouri
    @personfellowindividual


    I’m down for cannibalism
     
    Well, they are putting cannibalism on deck:

    https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg26134783-600-is-it-time-for-a-more-subtle-view-on-the-ultimate-taboo-cannibalism/

    Is it time for a more subtle view on the ultimate taboo: cannibalism?
    New archaeological evidence shows that ancient humans ate each other surprisingly often - sometimes for compassionate reasons. The finds give us an opportunity to reassess our views on the practice

    14 February 2024 .
     
    Valentine's Day!

    Ethically, cannibalism poses fewer issues than you might imagine. If a body can be bequeathed with consent to medical science, why can’t it be left to feed the hungry? Our aversion has been explained in various ways. Perhaps it is down to the fact that, in Western religious traditions, bodies are seen as the seat of the soul and have a whiff of the sacred. Or maybe it is culturally ingrained, with roots in early modern colonialism, when racist stereotypes of the cannibal were concocted to justify subjugation. These came to represent the “other” to Western societies – and revulsion towards cannibalism became a tenet of their moral conscience.

     

    Cannibalismphobia is racism!

    A slew of recent archaeological discoveries is now further complicating how we think about human cannibalism. Researchers have unearthed evidence suggesting that our hominin ancestors ate each other surprisingly often. What’s more, it seems that they weren’t always doing so for the reasons you might expect – for sustenance or to compete against and intimidate rivals – but often as funerary rituals to honour their dead.

    Like it or not, then, cannibalism is an important part of our story. This isn’t to say that we should change our attitudes towards it. But understanding its deep roots might shift our perspective on the few cultures that still practise cannibalism today, albeit only occasionally, such as the Aghori, a Hindu ascetic sect in India that does it in pursuit of transcendence. Above all, these discoveries invite us to reconsider our revulsion to cannibalism in the context of our evolutionary past
     
    "You vill liv in ze pod. You vill eat ze kadavers!"

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Wielgus

    Wow, what a terrible “article,” devoid of content. Who reads this garbage and feels like they actually learned anything about the world?

    • Replies: @Almost Missouri
    @Anonymous


    Who reads this garbage and feels like they actually learned anything about the world?
     
    It's The Science, man! The New Science!

    Ours not to make reply,
    Ours not to reason why,
    Ours but to hear the Sci!


    —Tennyson, maybe


    Wow, what a terrible “article,” devoid of content.
     
    The formerly respectable National Geographic says approximately the same thing in more words, if you have a subscription.

    https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/article/cannibalism-common-natural-history-bill-schutt

    Almost as if there is a coordinated psy-op.

    Replies: @Anonymous

  252. Anon[394] • Disclaimer says:
    @Bugg
    @Matthew Kelly

    Polyamory invariably is going to be a Muslim disaster of a family gaming the system for benefits and contributing nothing while barely raising their kids. Or ugly urban weirdos in cities. Nobody thinks some aging Jewish Park Slope whore pretending to be cutting edge is a trend to follow spare a few moron overeducated Times readers. She's a whore. It will not be Bill Paxton owning a string of hardware stores raising his prosperous productive family with multiple hot wives. It's bad public policy. Arab countries have been a mess forever in part because excess unmarried young men.

    They thought trans was gonna fly. Alas now Bud Light has Kid Rock, the UFC and Dana White to make amends. Nobody wants to lose money. Well except Hollywood, apparently. Every movie must now feature black girl magic, or Jeffrey Wright or Mashereyechart Ali (nee Hershal Gilmore, quite boring and ordinary and or likely to attract much notice of casting directors, but black AND Muslim, hot damn! ) overacting and saying how evil those white devils are to be considered Oscar-worthy.

    Replies: @Truth, @Anon

    Muslims in the current Western arrangement already have 4 single moms on benefits with their own apartments etc. Baby daddy comes around from time to time, he’s probably on benefits too. Anything marriage related is handled by their religion, not by the infidel government. It’s good to be a refugee, don’t mess things up.

    • Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Anon

    Also, they don't view it as being "welfare scum" -- they view it as "jizya", the rightful tribute paid to the Believers by the infidel vermin.

    Nobody in charge of Western policy actually understands what Islam really is -- what does "waqf" mean, Hillary? -- and they don't seem to intend to study it any time soon.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon

  253. @Cagey Beast
    OT:

    US Senate Republican leader says he will retire
    Mitch McConnell of Kentucky intends to remain in his seat through 2027, however

    [...]
    “One of life’s most underappreciated talents is to know when it’s time to move on to life’s next chapter,” the 82-year-old said in a speech on the Senate floor. “So I stand before you today ... to say that this will be my last term as Republican leader of the Senate.”
    [....]
    “That said, I believe more strongly than ever that America’s global leadership is essential to preserving the shining city on a hill that Ronald Reagan discussed. For as long as I am drawing breath on this earth I will defend American exceptionalism.”
     
    https://www.rt.com/news/593337-us-senate-republican-leader-retires/

    Good old American exceptionalism.

    Replies: @CalCooledge

    American exceptionalism.
    Exceptionally morally twisted and weird, and accepting of criminality by holy POC s.
    People should stop cheerleading for AE.

  254. Anonymous[420] • Disclaimer says:
    @Hypnotoad666
    @Jack D


    NOPE, won’t happen again, either.
     
    Your hatred of Russia is bizarre. But in case you hadn't noticed they are on the rise. They are the fastest growing economy in Europe while the EU stagnates year after year. They have diversified their economy in response to sanctions and are leading the BRICs in a global resistance to idiot U.S. foreign policy.

    I have no idea why people like you and Victoria Nuland want to make Russia the enemy, but your efforts to "weaken" it have backfired spectaculary.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Colin Wright, @Anonymous, @Peter Akuleyev

    A couple of years ago, he used to spit out verbatim bile and venom at Ukrainians, for deeply personal reasons, do doubt.
    Now, in a very odd damascene conversion, spinning on a sixpence, Ukrainians are now the sanctified good guys, and the bile, invective and foul smelling spittle is thrown at the Russians.

    A truly odd case.

    • Replies: @res
    @Anonymous

    It makes more sense once you realize Ukraine changed governments.

    Replies: @Jack D

  255. @TelfoedJohn
    More food and sexual neuroticism, less humanity.

    The same individual geese on which we conducted these experiments, first aroused my interest in the process of domestication. They were F1 hybrids of wild Greylags and domestic geese and they showed surprising deviations from the normal social and sexual behaviour of the wild birds. I realised that an overpowering increase in the drives of feeding as well as of copulation and a waning of more differentiated social instincts is characteristic of very many domestic animals. I was frightened – as I still am – by the thought that analogous genetical processes of deterioration may be at work with civilized humanity.
     
    Konrad Lorenz

    Replies: @Anon

    analogous genetical processes of deterioration may be at work with civilized humanity.

    Increased drive to feed and copulate, check. Also, just like geese, street shitting.

  256. Well said!

    Yup. I just clogged up google’s translator with it. Worth it.

  257. @New Dealer
    @AnotherDad

    Yes, polyamory would be terrible for children.

    There is another huge drawback. In a normal household of man, woman, couple of kids, you can never find a damned thing. Somebody didn't put the can opener back, you find it a few days later under the sink. Or one of the grownups decides to reorganize the kitchen cupboards again. You find your razor in the toilet tank and your shaving cream in the backyard. Your best sweater is missing for some reason. Your socket set is no longer with your tools, but somehow ended up with the pots and pans.

    All that would be exponentially worse in a polyamorous household.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Muggles, @DenverGregg, @hhsiii, @Colin Wright

    My wife and daughter complained that we were out of sour cream. I said no I bought some. They said nope, couldn’t find it in the fridge. It was found on the floor under a book shelf in the living room a week later. I have two boys age 7 and 9. One of them must have put it there but no idea why.

    • LOL: New Dealer
  258. @Hypnotoad666
    @Jack D


    NOPE, won’t happen again, either.
     
    Your hatred of Russia is bizarre. But in case you hadn't noticed they are on the rise. They are the fastest growing economy in Europe while the EU stagnates year after year. They have diversified their economy in response to sanctions and are leading the BRICs in a global resistance to idiot U.S. foreign policy.

    I have no idea why people like you and Victoria Nuland want to make Russia the enemy, but your efforts to "weaken" it have backfired spectaculary.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Colin Wright, @Anonymous, @Peter Akuleyev

    It’s simply insane to say Russia is “on the rise”. Yes, the economy is overheating due to military spending but nothing productive is happening there and the second the war ends that economy will collapse into hyperinflation. We’ve seen this story many times in many countries.

    The main, cynical, reason for Europeans to attack Russia now is that Russia is extraordinarily weak at the moment and now is the time to take advantage of that before China can. Much like European powers raced to carve up the dying Ottoman Empire, there is a battle between the West, China and increasingly India to dominate Russia. Putin is fighting a rearguard action but destroying the Russian military and the Russian economy in the process.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Peter Akuleyev

    The sad thing is that this is completely an own goal. Putin could have turned his attention to reinforcing the border with China and addressing Russia's demographic crisis. He didn't need this conflict with Ukraine. Yes, Ukraine was kind of a bad example to the Russian people (like Hong Kong was for the Chinese) - a place with a large # of Russian speakers that was democratic and had a free press. But the same is true to some extent in the Baltics. It wouldn't have been the end of the world to tolerate Ukraine.

    In the meantime he could have maintained his trade relationships with the West. Billions were coming in from the Nord Streams and other raw material exports that he was selling at full world market prices and not at cut rates like today.

    This money, even after paying for all of Putin's palaces and those of his oligarchs, could have paid for a modernization of his army so they wouldn't have to ride around in obsolete Soviet tanks. Instead he has done the opposite - he has lost most of his T-72s and now they are fielding ancient, beyond obsolete T-55s taken from dead storage. Hundreds of thousands of badly needed young Russian men are dead or disabled and hundreds of thousands more have fled overseas. And for what? So Putin could place himself among the great Czars? “Après moi, le déluge.”

    , @Anonymous
    @Peter Akuleyev

    'India dominate Russia.'

    Utterly ridiculous that anyone can believe this. Russia will forever be the hard man from the cold north west who put the 'Kush' in 'Hindu Kush'.

    On the other hand, India dominating the UK, Australia and Canada is, more or less, a racing certainty.
    India dominating the USA is moot at this point.

    Replies: @Looger, @Jack D

  259. @Anon 2
    As Thomas Friedman says today in his NY Times column, Israel is losing
    its greatest asset: acceptance. The fact that the Israeli Jews (with U.S.
    complicity) have turned Gaza into a slaughterhouse of women and
    children will be remembered for hundreds of years, and will have
    worldwide repercussions. Fewer Americans will vote for Jewish
    politicians. Fewer will watch Hollywood movies and TV shows
    (viewership levels are already in massive decline). At universities
    Jews are already being replaced by East Asians. As a result, Jews
    will find it harder to get the kind of jobs they’ve been used to, and more
    will hide their identity (fewer will be willing to go through life with
    names like Shapiro or Epstein).

    Fewer people will take the Old Testament seriously. After all, Netanyahu
    was quoting the Book of Deuteronomy to justify his savage strategy in
    Gaza. As a result, fewer people will become Evangelicals, and the U.S.
    will no longer have televangelists like Billy Graham, Pat Robertson,
    or John Hagee. Since the Evangelicals are the only Americans (in
    addition to Jews) who are passionate about Israel, fewer Americans
    will be willing to die in Middle-Eastern wars. Mainline Protestants
    have been in free fall since the ‘60s but the Catholics will be less
    affected since they depend on Tradition as much as the Bible.

    Replies: @Locutor

    Mainline Protestants have been in freefall since the ’60s…

    So are Catholics. They blew up their church in the ’60s, Vatican II, and weird Pope Francis is trying to finish the job.

    • Agree: deep anonymous
    • Replies: @Anon 2
    @Locutor

    I meant numerically - U.S. Catholics are holding their own at 20-23%.
    I agree that Vatican II was a disaster in so many ways. But Catholicism
    still attracts many converts. For example, Jordan Peterson’s wife
    converted to Catholicism last year, so maybe he will be next.

    Replies: @Locutor

  260. @Colin Wright
    @Hypnotoad666


    Your hatred of Russia is bizarre...
     
    Notice that Frau Katze signs off on it as well.

    And yet, truth be told, while the Russians have done horrible things to many groups, Jews have never been among their especial victims. So what's up?

    Replies: @SFG

    Nah, there were plenty of pogroms jn Czarist Russia. It’s been adduced here as a cause of Jewish Russophobia, which I guess I could buy, mostly on account of seeing Fiddler on the Riof as a kid.

    I sided with Ukraine initially but at this point think they’ve probably fought hard enough to keep most of their country and should probably let Putin have the eastern strip full of Russians. Enough dead Ukrainians and Russians already, this has turned into a WW1-style war of attrition where nothing is happening except lots of dead white boys. End it already.

    I have been quiet on this issue mostly because I don’t have that strong sympathies for either side; I think Putin is at fault for starting the war (and yes, I agree we pushed him to this point), but I am not particularly eager to see him humiliated-indeed, it is counterproductive. Always better to give your enemy a way to save face. Putin tells everyone he regathered the Russian people, the Ukrainians repelled the Russian invasion, everyone goes home to their borscht.

    Our leaders really ought to invest in an XBox and play Crusader Kings 2 or Three Kingdoms 15 or something instead of doing it with real people.

    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    @SFG

    "there were plenty of pogroms in Czarist Russia"

    Interestingly, Morgan Jones argues at this site that the pogrom narrative was greatly embellished.

    https://www.unz.com/article/great-variance/


    Reports of Russian persecution of Jews by Joseph Jacobs in The Times were credited as sparking the pogrom controversy in January 1882. They prompted meetings at Mansion House and the Guildhall, at which at least £200,000 was donated; these donations were collected into the Mansion House Fund, which the Board of Guardians and other organisations drew upon to help Jews settle in London or travel on to the USA. A Mansion House Committee was formed and was soon renamed the Russo-Jewish Committee, with Julian Goldsmid as chairman and Jacobs as secretary. Fellow journalist and Jewish activist Lucien Wolf amplified Jacobs’ efforts in the press and worked to co-ordinate the efforts of the AJA and the Board of Deputies of British Jews. Bishops, cardinals, authors and celebrities of the day were won to the cause by the atrocity reports.[4]

    Benjamin Disraeli as Prime Minister had narrowly been prevented from starting a war against Russia in 1877-8, and anti-Russian propaganda was already commonplace in parts of the British press.[5]

    According to John Klier the Times “habitually described it as ‘a backward country, which has not yet worked its way to the level of European life’. The paper had begun a low-level campaign against Russian mistreatment of the Jews even before the outbreak of the pogroms.”[6] The Times was at pains to condemn the Russian government at least as early as 1880. The Telegraph, owned by Harry Levy-Lawson, began to promote the same line with even greater fervour. The Jewish World then, between July and October 1881, published reports from an unnamed Special Correspondent which “portrayed the pogroms dramatically, as great in scale and inhuman in their brutality”, including rape and murder of Jews on a large scale across many locations. According to Klier, “[M]any of his claims, such as the enormous number of rapes, are unconfirmed or flatly contradicted by the archival record… His account most resembles a compilation of hearsay evidence, very little of it collected from first-hand observers. His atrocity reports, in particular, must be viewed with extreme caution.”[7]
     
    As a young student I met a Jew from Kiev (who'd left the USSR as was) who said you could be attacked in the street there for being Jewish - but then as a child I was attacked in the street in Wales (by other children) for having an English accent. I've not held it against the entire Welsh nation.

    Replies: @Jack D, @Ben tillman

    , @Colin Wright
    @SFG


    'Nah, there were plenty of pogroms jn Czarist Russia. It’s been adduced here as a cause of Jewish Russophobia, which I guess I could buy, mostly on account of seeing Fiddler on the Riof as a kid...'
     
    Yeah, but (a) it's a fantasy that the Tsarist government incited those pogroms, (b) the actual death tolls ranged from none to a few score (Kishinev, which wasn't even inhabited by Russians).

    What was the total over half a century? A hundred? Blacks kill three times that many whites in America every year.

    Compare and contrast to the fate the Russian state visited upon the Eastern Germans, the Crimean Tatars, the Circassians. Up to half of these peoples died. Did the Tsars kill two million Jews? Were there vast convoys of Jews, being led off to slavery and often eventual death in Siberia?

    And there are others who suffered worse than the Jews as well. Consider the repeated (and materially very bloody) suppressions of gentile Polish nationalism over the course of the Nineteenth Century. The fates Stalin visited upon gentile Ukrainians and the peoples of the Baltic.

    And yet, it's the Jews who hate Russia. It's curious -- and I don't think it reflects well on the Jews.
    , @HA
    @SFG

    "and should probably let Putin have the eastern strip full of Russians."

    Maybe it'll come to that at some point, but for now, why would Putin agree to only that? As I noted earlier:


    Right now, even if Zelensky agrees to negotiate, there is no evidence that Putin wants to negotiate, that he wants to stop fighting, or that he has ever wanted to stop fighting. And yes, according to Western officials who have periodic conversations with their Russian counterparts, attempts have been made to find out.

    Nor is there any evidence that Putin wants to partition Ukraine, keeping only the territories he currently occupies and allowing the rest to prosper like South Korea. His goal remains the destruction of Ukraine—all of Ukraine—and his allies and propagandists are still talking about how, once they achieve this goal, they will expand their empire further… calling Poland Russia’s “historical enemy” and threatening Poles with the loss of their state too.
     

    That was written in November -- has anything really changed to the extent that Putin would agree to something even before seeing whether Trump will win next November?
  261. https://www.ft.com/content/653bbb26-8a22-4db3-b43d-c34a0b774303

    https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/ftcms%3Ae6d0f828-b717-4a8e-8275-89cccd5a9ac2?source=next-article&fit=scale-down&quality=highest&width=700&dpr=2

    https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/ftcms%3Acf2515c9-6708-4717-a30a-cebb0bef01d3?source=next-article&fit=scale-down&quality=highest&width=700&dpr=2

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @JohnnyWalker123

    NEVER SPEAK TO ME OR MY SON AGAIN

  262. @Frau Katze
    @BB753


    In the Middle Ages, in Europe, even princesses would marry between the ages of 11-16, to much older men.
     
    Especially princesses. Marriages were arranged for political purposes.

    Replies: @BB753

    Agreed, but they still had to do the deed and wives were expected to produce heirs as soon as possible.

    • Agree: Frau Katze
  263. @SFG
    @Colin Wright

    Nah, there were plenty of pogroms jn Czarist Russia. It’s been adduced here as a cause of Jewish Russophobia, which I guess I could buy, mostly on account of seeing Fiddler on the Riof as a kid.

    I sided with Ukraine initially but at this point think they’ve probably fought hard enough to keep most of their country and should probably let Putin have the eastern strip full of Russians. Enough dead Ukrainians and Russians already, this has turned into a WW1-style war of attrition where nothing is happening except lots of dead white boys. End it already.

    I have been quiet on this issue mostly because I don’t have that strong sympathies for either side; I think Putin is at fault for starting the war (and yes, I agree we pushed him to this point), but I am not particularly eager to see him humiliated-indeed, it is counterproductive. Always better to give your enemy a way to save face. Putin tells everyone he regathered the Russian people, the Ukrainians repelled the Russian invasion, everyone goes home to their borscht.

    Our leaders really ought to invest in an XBox and play Crusader Kings 2 or Three Kingdoms 15 or something instead of doing it with real people.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Colin Wright, @HA

    “there were plenty of pogroms in Czarist Russia”

    Interestingly, Morgan Jones argues at this site that the pogrom narrative was greatly embellished.

    https://www.unz.com/article/great-variance/

    Reports of Russian persecution of Jews by Joseph Jacobs in The Times were credited as sparking the pogrom controversy in January 1882. They prompted meetings at Mansion House and the Guildhall, at which at least £200,000 was donated; these donations were collected into the Mansion House Fund, which the Board of Guardians and other organisations drew upon to help Jews settle in London or travel on to the USA. A Mansion House Committee was formed and was soon renamed the Russo-Jewish Committee, with Julian Goldsmid as chairman and Jacobs as secretary. Fellow journalist and Jewish activist Lucien Wolf amplified Jacobs’ efforts in the press and worked to co-ordinate the efforts of the AJA and the Board of Deputies of British Jews. Bishops, cardinals, authors and celebrities of the day were won to the cause by the atrocity reports.[4]

    Benjamin Disraeli as Prime Minister had narrowly been prevented from starting a war against Russia in 1877-8, and anti-Russian propaganda was already commonplace in parts of the British press.[5]

    According to John Klier the Times “habitually described it as ‘a backward country, which has not yet worked its way to the level of European life’. The paper had begun a low-level campaign against Russian mistreatment of the Jews even before the outbreak of the pogroms.”[6] The Times was at pains to condemn the Russian government at least as early as 1880. The Telegraph, owned by Harry Levy-Lawson, began to promote the same line with even greater fervour. The Jewish World then, between July and October 1881, published reports from an unnamed Special Correspondent which “portrayed the pogroms dramatically, as great in scale and inhuman in their brutality”, including rape and murder of Jews on a large scale across many locations. According to Klier, “[M]any of his claims, such as the enormous number of rapes, are unconfirmed or flatly contradicted by the archival record… His account most resembles a compilation of hearsay evidence, very little of it collected from first-hand observers. His atrocity reports, in particular, must be viewed with extreme caution.”[7]

    As a young student I met a Jew from Kiev (who’d left the USSR as was) who said you could be attacked in the street there for being Jewish – but then as a child I was attacked in the street in Wales (by other children) for having an English accent. I’ve not held it against the entire Welsh nation.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @YetAnotherAnon

    You have to understand that pre-WWI Europe had been a mostly peaceful place for a century after Napoleon - the world was not yet inured to genocide or mass death of civilians. The Kishinev Pogrom of 1903 attracted world wide publicity but the casualties were as follows: 49 Jews were killed, 92 seriously injured, and 500 lightly injured. 40 years later that would have been considered a blessing if that's all that had happened in one day. But by the peaceful standards of 1903, that was a very big deal.

    But the Men of Unz contrarian narrative (American slaves had it great, Jews had it great, etc.) is a bunch of shit. Millions of Jews didn't leave Russia because it was great.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Colin Wright

    , @Ben tillman
    @YetAnotherAnon

    Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.

  264. @Anon
    @Bugg

    Muslims in the current Western arrangement already have 4 single moms on benefits with their own apartments etc. Baby daddy comes around from time to time, he's probably on benefits too. Anything marriage related is handled by their religion, not by the infidel government. It's good to be a refugee, don't mess things up.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease

    Also, they don’t view it as being “welfare scum” — they view it as “jizya”, the rightful tribute paid to the Believers by the infidel vermin.

    Nobody in charge of Western policy actually understands what Islam really is — what does “waqf” mean, Hillary? — and they don’t seem to intend to study it any time soon.

    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    @The Germ Theory of Disease


    "Nobody in charge of Western policy actually understands what Islam really is — what does “waqf” mean, Hillary? — and they don’t seem to intend to study it any time soon."
     
    To be fair I don't think they plan to study the Talmud soon, either.
  265. @njguy73
    @J.Ross


    Heinlein proposed a system of polyamory which would exploit specialization: one person’s great with kids, one person’s a great cook, one person ensures that the can opener doesn’t go walkies, one person’s good with money and does everyone’s taxes.

     

    In a short, a spouse-by-committee.

    And didn't some Heinlein character say that specializtion was for insects? That a human should be able to butcher a hog, design a ship, cook a tasty meal, fight courageously, and die gallantly?

    Replies: @SFG

    Heinlein doesn’t really fit into our modern culture war left and right, and he didn’t in his own era either. As a libertarian militarist macho geek polyamorist, well, he wasn’t really anyone’s bag. His wife was apparently a WAC and engineer who turned him right on economics.

    Probably as a successful sci-fi writer he was able to get one of these libertarian horny nerd chicks all the geeks fantasize about (IRL most of them are insufferably woke). You can kind of see the same thing with Geoffrey Miller and Diana Fleischman. I genuinely can’t think of any other examples, and there’s a reason-it’s rare.

  266. @Reg Cæsar
    @Voltarde


    What’s the New Current Thing?

    Thanks to Boomers...
     

    I was going to say fools and morons pushing tenuous "generation" labels, but that's been a Thing for a while now, hasn't it?

    Replies: @duncsbaby

    The guy who said, “Don’t trust anyone over 30,” will be 84 on 4-4-24. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Weinberg

  267. @Locutor
    @Anon 2


    Mainline Protestants have been in freefall since the ’60s...
     
    So are Catholics. They blew up their church in the '60s, Vatican II, and weird Pope Francis is trying to finish the job.

    Replies: @Anon 2

    I meant numerically – U.S. Catholics are holding their own at 20-23%.
    I agree that Vatican II was a disaster in so many ways. But Catholicism
    still attracts many converts. For example, Jordan Peterson’s wife
    converted to Catholicism last year, so maybe he will be next.

    • Replies: @Locutor
    @Anon 2


    I meant numerically – U.S. Catholics are holding their own at 20-23%.
     
    The Catholics in America keep their numbers artificially high by encouraging - it looks charitable - and counting Mexican immigrants even if they hardly if ever show up at church let alone give money.

    But Catholicism still attracts many converts. For example, Jordan Peterson’s wife converted to Catholicism last year, so maybe he will be next.
     
    For every Mrs. Peterson convert they get something like five people leave.

    P.S. President Biden is Catholic. Big deal.
  268. @J.Ross
    OT -- Are you ready for Kazakh cinema?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNNBuJGZ6CQ

    Replies: @BB753

    At this point, anything is better than Hollywood crap.

  269. @AnotherDad
    @MEH 0910


    Ethan Coen’s New Movie Has Disastrous Box Office Opening, Misses Top 5 In First Weekend
    The new Ethan Coen movie Drive-Away Dolls barely makes it into the Top 10 in its domestic opening weekend, landing at No. 8 with a paltry debut.
     
    LOL.

    Amazing these people can not figure out the obvious. Queers--I mean male queers, the word apparently has been repurposed to something or another--are viscerally disgusting, but lesbians are just boring.

    Women and their stories are interesting because of sex--their capability to make babies with a man. Therefore man-woman coupling, "who will match with and make babies with whom?"--which speaks to lineage and the future--is of some dramatic interest.

    Men can be of interest beyond that. Men make war and ergo decide the fate of nations and empires. Men break the law and other men hunt down and suppress the lawbreakers. Men sail around the world and discover new lands. Men come up with new ideas and inventions and make things that fly and go boom. Some drama.

    Women, strip away sex--the "who will she make babies with"--are rather boring. They ... talk.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Mike Tre, @Twinkie, @Looger, @Jack D, @New Dealer, @R.G. Camara, @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Corvinus

    Wrong, wrong, wrong, extra sausage points for being… well, wrong.

    Speaking as the “I lived with 23 topless lesbians in a commune and survived to tell about it” expert, I can tell you that topless lesbians swaggering around pretending to be sailors are really quite fetching, even when they don’t mean to do that. At least the college-age ones. You can ask my then-gf, who used to get beet-red with envy.

    As for this horse-swaggle…

    “Women, strip away sex–the “who will she make babies with”–are rather boring. They … talk.”

    Most of the lesbians I know — and I still kn0w quite a few — transfer their maternal instincts into societal issues like homelessness. Some of them get it wrong, crusading for nonsense issues, but hey… a lot of ’em make a heck of a lot better difference in life than random internet bozos.

    Well she sings a song
    So sad and high,
    And the Tulsa Queen
    Don’t ever lie.

    — La Godess Emmyou Harris, Queen of Reality

    • Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    In an old haunt in Cambridge,
    Well-dusted with mops,
    Lived 23 lesbians
    Who didn't wear tops.

    At four kooky tables
    They broke their bread,
    Supped vegan vichysoisse,
    And went to bed.

    They knew in their hearts
    One plus one is three.
    The weirdest one
    Was GToD.

    (apologies to the creator of the sublime mural in Bemelmans Bar at the Carlyle.)

  270. @Anonymous
    @TWS

    Jack D probably covers a wider breadth of subject matter than any other single commenter on this blog.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @TWS, @anonymous, @J.Ross, @BB753

    “Jack D probably covers a wider breadth of subject matter than any other single commenter on this blog.”

    In all likelihood, Jack D is actually a team of 16 Jewish grad students sitting on the internet all day long, doing their IDF military service as a psy-ops team in an underground bunker in Haifa.

    • Replies: @deep anonymous
    @The Germ Theory of Disease


    "In all likelihood, Jack D is actually a team of 16 Jewish grad students sitting on the internet all day long, doing their IDF military service as a psy-ops team in an underground bunker in Haifa."
     
    The reason I doubt that is because pretty much all his posts seem to exhibit the same writing style. OTOH, Unit 8200 probably has advanced AI capabilities, so who knows? But in any event, Jack D. is amazingly prolific. I wonder how he finds time to work.
  271. @JohnnyWalker123
    https://twitter.com/StatisticUrban/status/1763064005541962064

    https://twitter.com/StatisticUrban/status/1763074143585780139

    https://www.ft.com/content/653bbb26-8a22-4db3-b43d-c34a0b774303

    https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/ftcms%3Ae6d0f828-b717-4a8e-8275-89cccd5a9ac2?source=next-article&fit=scale-down&quality=highest&width=700&dpr=2

    https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/ftcms%3Acf2515c9-6708-4717-a30a-cebb0bef01d3?source=next-article&fit=scale-down&quality=highest&width=700&dpr=2

    Replies: @J.Ross

    NEVER SPEAK TO ME OR MY SON AGAIN

  272. @The Anti-Gnostic
    @Guest007

    You really are tripping over mouse poop.

    Replies: @Guest007

    Why make a reply without answer a simple question of who is in that picture and what was the vent. The one time that Semanya won a gold metal in an international even, the third place finisher was white.

  273. @YetAnotherAnon
    @New Dealer

    But... afaik (certainly in the UK) no fault divorce where wife gets the kids (nearly all cases) means

    a) wife keeps the house (even if she needs to up the mortgage)
    b) she gets cash support from hubby "because of the kids".

    Hubby ends up in a bedsit and sees the kids on weekends.

    And yet and yet ... of our little group of young middle class parents, the men whose wives binned them out are all partnered again, some with children by Wife #2. All the women who did the binning are single.

    Replies: @Bill Jones

    So the binning women got kids, a house and an income stream from hubby One.
    Why remarry?

  274. @Anonymous
    @Bill Jones

    He was an old Etonian born at the height of Edwardian pomp.

    Replies: @Bill Jones

    Straightlaced?

  275. @Almost Missouri
    @personfellowindividual


    I’m down for cannibalism
     
    Well, they are putting cannibalism on deck:

    https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg26134783-600-is-it-time-for-a-more-subtle-view-on-the-ultimate-taboo-cannibalism/

    Is it time for a more subtle view on the ultimate taboo: cannibalism?
    New archaeological evidence shows that ancient humans ate each other surprisingly often - sometimes for compassionate reasons. The finds give us an opportunity to reassess our views on the practice

    14 February 2024 .
     
    Valentine's Day!

    Ethically, cannibalism poses fewer issues than you might imagine. If a body can be bequeathed with consent to medical science, why can’t it be left to feed the hungry? Our aversion has been explained in various ways. Perhaps it is down to the fact that, in Western religious traditions, bodies are seen as the seat of the soul and have a whiff of the sacred. Or maybe it is culturally ingrained, with roots in early modern colonialism, when racist stereotypes of the cannibal were concocted to justify subjugation. These came to represent the “other” to Western societies – and revulsion towards cannibalism became a tenet of their moral conscience.

     

    Cannibalismphobia is racism!

    A slew of recent archaeological discoveries is now further complicating how we think about human cannibalism. Researchers have unearthed evidence suggesting that our hominin ancestors ate each other surprisingly often. What’s more, it seems that they weren’t always doing so for the reasons you might expect – for sustenance or to compete against and intimidate rivals – but often as funerary rituals to honour their dead.

    Like it or not, then, cannibalism is an important part of our story. This isn’t to say that we should change our attitudes towards it. But understanding its deep roots might shift our perspective on the few cultures that still practise cannibalism today, albeit only occasionally, such as the Aghori, a Hindu ascetic sect in India that does it in pursuit of transcendence. Above all, these discoveries invite us to reconsider our revulsion to cannibalism in the context of our evolutionary past
     
    "You vill liv in ze pod. You vill eat ze kadavers!"

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Wielgus

    I guess normalising LGBT is not transgressive enough. It’s “long pig” time…

    • Replies: @deep anonymous
    @Wielgus


    "I guess normalising LGBT is not transgressive enough."
     
    I don't remember where I read this (and so I can't give proper attribution), but I suspect there is a ratcheting effect at work here. The Left is nothing if not relentless. Each time, the Left proposes some new, ridiculous cause, the Right (the Left's shadow, as Dabney said) retreats and tries to bargain with them, and, after the latest victory in the Culture War, the Left has to come up with a new, even more ridiculous Cause of the Day/Most Important Issue Yet!
  276. @anonymous
    In Los Angeles, it’s idiot negroes leading high speed car chases… every… fucking… day.

    These happened quite recently…

    https://www.youtube.com/live/1cVjjmLFmyo?si=Acm3qUkCMTJxuGJi

    https://youtu.be/CXUgZ6rvzB4

    In the vid below, the idiot negro survived, but six others did not. She had multiple reckless driving charges prior to this doozy.

    Question: Are there any stats available delineating the race of the leaders of So. Cal car chases and resulting deaths? I'm doubting it, since the stats would very likely lean absurdly towards negro offenders, enough so that would appear to be "a new thing."

    https://youtu.be/2YyXAD6p4tc

    Replies: @Pop Warner, @TWS, @Servenet

    It’s impossible to imagine an America, say, 60 years ago in which the 90% White population could glimpse the future of the utter destructiveness of blacks and not panic to the point of sending them OUT, somewhere, ANYWHERE but in the midst of themselves. A space alien would never believe a species this awful would not only be tolerated among the civilized but its invasiveness would not be checked before a freaking apocalypse overtook it.

  277. @Frau Katze
    @prosa123


    I don’t get the vulnerability part. Men are much more likely to become victims of violent crime.
     
    Woman are physically weaker than men. If a woman ends up at the mercy of a psychopath she’s doomed.

    As a female you must try to avoid that scenario your entire life. True, most women won’t end up murdered by a psycho but the possibility is always there.

    In Canada, where handguns are uncommon, men are safer than in the US. But female disadvantage is the same.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Twinkie, @Colin Wright, @Looger

    Woman are physically weaker than men. If a woman ends up at the mercy of a psychopath she’s doomed.

    As a female you must try to avoid that scenario your entire life. True, most women won’t end up murdered by a psycho but the possibility is always there.

    In Canada, where handguns are uncommon, men are safer than in the US. But female disadvantage is the same.

    And yet, in Canada, women have voted more immigrant men into the country, who then rape and murder them.

    Curious.

    I didn’t understand the dynamic until my ex-wife, immigration consultant, got very angry with me because a woman was raped and murdered at Franklin Station in Calgary. As she harangued me about this I began to wonder how many of the men in the gang were from countries that she brought people in from.

    Women with political power is the scariest thing imaginable. I thought marrying a “smart woman” was a good idea – it ended up making me realize that they were given political power in order to destroy the west.

    You say women fear being killed by a psycho, ok fine I can understand that. Traditionally that meant women had chaparones. But now women want to have their cake and eat it too, they want to feel independent but still they are scared. So they vote for more “male attention” subconciously and they end up with more “psychos” (uncivilized men with zero restraint).

    It’s quite the mental prisons you women have there, it’d be a shame if you got voting power and externalized your internal contradictions into a hellscape society.

    A real shame that would be.

    • Replies: @Frau Katze
    @Looger

    I think you are correct that women trend more liberal than men. But not this woman.

  278. @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Anon

    Also, they don't view it as being "welfare scum" -- they view it as "jizya", the rightful tribute paid to the Believers by the infidel vermin.

    Nobody in charge of Western policy actually understands what Islam really is -- what does "waqf" mean, Hillary? -- and they don't seem to intend to study it any time soon.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon

    “Nobody in charge of Western policy actually understands what Islam really is — what does “waqf” mean, Hillary? — and they don’t seem to intend to study it any time soon.”

    To be fair I don’t think they plan to study the Talmud soon, either.

  279. @Bardon Kaldian
    @Jack D

    I would recommend to all non-idiots to read columns & watch Dan Schueftan videos:

    https://www.israelhayom.com/writer/dan-schueftan/page/2/

    For instance: https://www.israelhayom.com/opinions/ukraine-invasion-is-putins-gift-to-the-western-world/

    https://www.israelhayom.com/opinions/is-ukraine-headed-for-a-rude-awakening/

    https://www.israelhayom.com/opinions/crying-racism-while-denying-reality/

    To sum it:

    * Americans are force for the good, but they are frequently disastrous in their parochialism & "operational mind". Strategic mind is dealing with situations where there are no solutions. See under Eisenhower 1956 & Nasser, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan,..

    * Israel is the only developed country where non-zombified secular women want children

    * gifted peoples ruled by barbarians are the real danger (Germany, now Iran)

    * the only Middle Eastern gifted peoples are Israelis and Iranians

    * nationalism is good & the bad thing is extreme nationalism, so post-1945 fight against nationalism in the Western world was a grave mistake

    * the Western world is the pinnacle of everything, but you cannot force its values on the rest

    * with Arabs- better enlightened absolutism than democracy leading to Islamism

    * anti-waxxers should be isolated from the normal world

    * Harvard professors live in la-la-land, similar to most American foreign policy makers

    * Obama and Carter were suckers & Nixon was the man

    * Palestinians are incurable

    * Israelis tend to fall asleep politically every 10 or 20 years

    * Putin already lost the war


    Also, two videos from 1 year & 2 months ago (hosts are annoying with their interruptions)


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIDB_lY23Hs

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xl9vLBDTJkg

    Replies: @Muggles

    * anti-waxxers should be isolated from the normal world

    You throw out a lot of stuff here, but this one seemed outside of the norm

    Why do you care about this now? (I hate to bring this up since this whole vax/COVID thing is old news and not very interesting).

    Do you care if others had polio vax or measles vax?

    While I was vaxed, mainly for travel purposes (Canada was fussy/fascist) as it turned out the multiple vaxed DC Beltway elites were all vaxed often more than once. And practically all of the pooh-bahs got COVID multiple times. Didn’t harm them much either.

    My older friend who was very anti vax never got it either. Nor did I.

    So the pseudo RNA “vaccine” didn’t work that well, though maybe did some good. Oh, and these same COVID bullies also wore masks all the time (except at their private parties…)

    People who didn’t go for that (took their own risk) should be locked up? You are dangerously stupid on that.

    The continuing “mask wearers” are just letting us know who is a Fauci Democrat worshiper, Asian, or scared old person who thinks this is going to protect them. Better to wear a St. Christopher medallion.

    You think COVIDians are “normal” and those who aren’t believers should be locked up?

    Ruining your credibility here.

    (Please, let’s avoid this subject entirely as much as possible…)

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @Muggles

    The leaders get different drugs, and in some cases it has come out that they were actually not vaccinated, plus there have been lower level leaders who got the vax gen pop and had issues afterward. It is clear that equality and democracy are lies, and our leadership have moved to a big caste-divide system. Photograph of Colin Powell holding up a bottle of Ambien, 2003, colorized.

    , @Bardon Kaldian
    @Muggles

    I just say what he says:

    https://www.israelhayom.com/opinions/its-time-to-isolate-anti-vaxxers-from-the-rest-of-society/

    It's time to isolate anti-vaxxers from the rest of society

    Replies: @HA, @Muggles

  280. @Anonymous
    @Almost Missouri

    Wow, what a terrible "article," devoid of content. Who reads this garbage and feels like they actually learned anything about the world?

    Replies: @Almost Missouri

    Who reads this garbage and feels like they actually learned anything about the world?

    It’s The Science, man! The New Science!

    Ours not to make reply,
    Ours not to reason why,
    Ours but to hear the Sci!

    —Tennyson, maybe

    [MORE]

    Wow, what a terrible “article,” devoid of content.

    The formerly respectable National Geographic says approximately the same thing in more words, if you have a subscription.

    https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/article/cannibalism-common-natural-history-bill-schutt

    Almost as if there is a coordinated psy-op.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Almost Missouri

    Ah, that article is much better. Of course, it's still full of dubious assertions (climate change will cause mass cannibalism? Taking communion is cannibalism? Native Caribbean populations died out because cannibal-hating Spaniards slaughtered them, not because of disease?) But it at least has the decency to mention prion diseases--a great reason to "don't try this at home."

  281. \
    Small groups are definitely the mainstream for “these kids today”. See YouTube. Also, as you can see, even nice girls from good families love it, at least for a while, and they do a lot of other things that before now were rare in the solidly lower-middle-class America. Many if not most of them have no problem with millions of viewsful of people watching them with almost clinical attention. This is beyond good in my opinion, as long as we take care of the many lurking reefs — the downsides, especially, of course, for women. I do think, though, that it may really take off in the context of online VR, which I have some experience with.
    Also, and I think I’ve mentioned it before, having sex in groups is a behavior of aristocrats everywhere, and this the good clean recreation is now seeping down to the other social strata the way the others did.

  282. @Anonymous
    @TWS

    Jack D probably covers a wider breadth of subject matter than any other single commenter on this blog.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @TWS, @anonymous, @J.Ross, @BB753

    But there’s always and only one question on his plate, “Is it good for the neocons?”*

    *You thought I was going to say, “Jews” didn’t you?😂

    • Replies: @Mike Tre
    @TWS

    You did.

  283. @Muggles
    @Bardon Kaldian


    * anti-waxxers should be isolated from the normal world
     
    You throw out a lot of stuff here, but this one seemed outside of the norm

    Why do you care about this now? (I hate to bring this up since this whole vax/COVID thing is old news and not very interesting).

    Do you care if others had polio vax or measles vax?

    While I was vaxed, mainly for travel purposes (Canada was fussy/fascist) as it turned out the multiple vaxed DC Beltway elites were all vaxed often more than once. And practically all of the pooh-bahs got COVID multiple times. Didn't harm them much either.

    My older friend who was very anti vax never got it either. Nor did I.

    So the pseudo RNA "vaccine" didn't work that well, though maybe did some good. Oh, and these same COVID bullies also wore masks all the time (except at their private parties...)

    People who didn't go for that (took their own risk) should be locked up? You are dangerously stupid on that.

    The continuing "mask wearers" are just letting us know who is a Fauci Democrat worshiper, Asian, or scared old person who thinks this is going to protect them. Better to wear a St. Christopher medallion.

    You think COVIDians are "normal" and those who aren't believers should be locked up?

    Ruining your credibility here.

    (Please, let's avoid this subject entirely as much as possible...)

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Bardon Kaldian

    The leaders get different drugs, and in some cases it has come out that they were actually not vaccinated, plus there have been lower level leaders who got the vax gen pop and had issues afterward. It is clear that equality and democracy are lies, and our leadership have moved to a big caste-divide system. Photograph of Colin Powell holding up a bottle of Ambien, 2003, colorized.

  284. @Muggles
    @Bardon Kaldian


    * anti-waxxers should be isolated from the normal world
     
    You throw out a lot of stuff here, but this one seemed outside of the norm

    Why do you care about this now? (I hate to bring this up since this whole vax/COVID thing is old news and not very interesting).

    Do you care if others had polio vax or measles vax?

    While I was vaxed, mainly for travel purposes (Canada was fussy/fascist) as it turned out the multiple vaxed DC Beltway elites were all vaxed often more than once. And practically all of the pooh-bahs got COVID multiple times. Didn't harm them much either.

    My older friend who was very anti vax never got it either. Nor did I.

    So the pseudo RNA "vaccine" didn't work that well, though maybe did some good. Oh, and these same COVID bullies also wore masks all the time (except at their private parties...)

    People who didn't go for that (took their own risk) should be locked up? You are dangerously stupid on that.

    The continuing "mask wearers" are just letting us know who is a Fauci Democrat worshiper, Asian, or scared old person who thinks this is going to protect them. Better to wear a St. Christopher medallion.

    You think COVIDians are "normal" and those who aren't believers should be locked up?

    Ruining your credibility here.

    (Please, let's avoid this subject entirely as much as possible...)

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Bardon Kaldian

    I just say what he says:

    https://www.israelhayom.com/opinions/its-time-to-isolate-anti-vaxxers-from-the-rest-of-society/

    It’s time to isolate anti-vaxxers from the rest of society

    • Replies: @HA
    @Bardon Kaldian


    https://www.israelhayom.com/opinions/its-time-to-isolate-anti-vaxxers-from-the-rest-of-society/
     
    He's from Haifa. The Haredi anti-vaxx movement is poised to hit Israel especially hard.
    , @Muggles
    @Bardon Kaldian

    What he says, and you you echo, is fascist.

    The feeble logic is based on nothing but fantasy.

    Evidence is now pretty conclusive on the facts of vax vs. non vax. The vax wasn't magic.

    Of course Jews as a group (many, not all) seem pretty paranoid about any social "risks" and thus those Jews are quite ready to become some sick version of Hitler.

    I won't clog up the comments here on this.

    But if you think bullying or imposing crazed fear based authoritarian measures is any solution to anything, you are part of the problem. Hitler (to use a tired trope) used the same warped logic for his "final solution" for European "genetic health."

    Oh, but he was wrong about that...

    You and your Israeli buddy are of course infallible truth knowers.

  285. Anonymous[265] • Disclaimer says:
    @Almost Missouri
    @Anonymous


    Who reads this garbage and feels like they actually learned anything about the world?
     
    It's The Science, man! The New Science!

    Ours not to make reply,
    Ours not to reason why,
    Ours but to hear the Sci!


    —Tennyson, maybe


    Wow, what a terrible “article,” devoid of content.
     
    The formerly respectable National Geographic says approximately the same thing in more words, if you have a subscription.

    https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/article/cannibalism-common-natural-history-bill-schutt

    Almost as if there is a coordinated psy-op.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    Ah, that article is much better. Of course, it’s still full of dubious assertions (climate change will cause mass cannibalism? Taking communion is cannibalism? Native Caribbean populations died out because cannibal-hating Spaniards slaughtered them, not because of disease?) But it at least has the decency to mention prion diseases–a great reason to “don’t try this at home.”

  286. @kaganovitch
    @Ebony Obelisk


    If you’re a 30 year old cos bet white male and you’re it harried have multiple children age height six fighters then you are a lowers
     
    Well said!

    Replies: @res

    EO is at zir best when unintelligible.

  287. @Anonymous
    @Hypnotoad666

    A couple of years ago, he used to spit out verbatim bile and venom at Ukrainians, for deeply personal reasons, do doubt.
    Now, in a very odd damascene conversion, spinning on a sixpence, Ukrainians are now the sanctified good guys, and the bile, invective and foul smelling spittle is thrown at the Russians.

    A truly odd case.

    Replies: @res

    It makes more sense once you realize Ukraine changed governments.

    • Agree: J.Ross
    • Replies: @Jack D
    @res

    It really didn't have much to do with that. There are a lot of places in E. Europe that have kind of shitty, nationalist, semi-corrupt governments that I don't really like much. Poland until recently. Hungary, Bosnia, Moldova, etc. The Nazis and Soviets really did a thorough job of destroying civil society in those places - a real double whammy (and in some cases they were really not such hot places to begin with). It's going to take them decades (if ever) until they recover fully. Ukraine was high up on that list. But all of them (to some extent and including Ukraine) were working on joining the modern Western world. In fits and starts and with differing levels of success but they were working on it. None of these places deserved to be invaded by the Russians (again).

    What some Ukrainians did during the Nazi occupation was shameful and despicable and I will never forget or forgive them for that.

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b0/%D0%9F%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B4_%D0%B2_%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B5_%28%D0%98%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE-%D0%A4%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA%29_%D0%B2_%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C_%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B0_%D0%B3%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BB-%D0%B3%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B0_%D0%9F%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%88%D0%B8_%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B9%D1%85%D1%81%D0%BB%D1%8F%D0%B9%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0_%D0%93%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%B0_%D0%A4%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_2.jpeg

    But that was 80 years ago. Today's Ukraine is really different. Yes they have a few Neo-Nazis but so do the Russians. Putin was good pals with Utkin, the "Wagner" in Wagner , at least until he killed him (being Putin's pal is almost as dangerous as being his enemy).

    https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-06c5bbf34be54348efcf4e41a192bf96-lq

    If Putin was looking for Nazis he should have started in the Kremlin.

    When I visited Ukraine nothing untoward happened to us. I was warned that there would be phony speed traps and that the cops would solicit bribes (American dollars preferred!) but no, not even that. No one even added up a restaurant check incorrectly. It was clearly a poor country and a work in progress but they were trying (at least in the big cities) to join the modern world.

    Replies: @Colin Wright

  288. @Peter Akuleyev
    @Hypnotoad666

    It's simply insane to say Russia is "on the rise". Yes, the economy is overheating due to military spending but nothing productive is happening there and the second the war ends that economy will collapse into hyperinflation. We've seen this story many times in many countries.

    The main, cynical, reason for Europeans to attack Russia now is that Russia is extraordinarily weak at the moment and now is the time to take advantage of that before China can. Much like European powers raced to carve up the dying Ottoman Empire, there is a battle between the West, China and increasingly India to dominate Russia. Putin is fighting a rearguard action but destroying the Russian military and the Russian economy in the process.

    Replies: @Jack D, @Anonymous

    The sad thing is that this is completely an own goal. Putin could have turned his attention to reinforcing the border with China and addressing Russia’s demographic crisis. He didn’t need this conflict with Ukraine. Yes, Ukraine was kind of a bad example to the Russian people (like Hong Kong was for the Chinese) – a place with a large # of Russian speakers that was democratic and had a free press. But the same is true to some extent in the Baltics. It wouldn’t have been the end of the world to tolerate Ukraine.

    In the meantime he could have maintained his trade relationships with the West. Billions were coming in from the Nord Streams and other raw material exports that he was selling at full world market prices and not at cut rates like today.

    This money, even after paying for all of Putin’s palaces and those of his oligarchs, could have paid for a modernization of his army so they wouldn’t have to ride around in obsolete Soviet tanks. Instead he has done the opposite – he has lost most of his T-72s and now they are fielding ancient, beyond obsolete T-55s taken from dead storage. Hundreds of thousands of badly needed young Russian men are dead or disabled and hundreds of thousands more have fled overseas. And for what? So Putin could place himself among the great Czars? “Après moi, le déluge.”

    • Disagree: Colin Wright
  289. @YetAnotherAnon
    @SFG

    "there were plenty of pogroms in Czarist Russia"

    Interestingly, Morgan Jones argues at this site that the pogrom narrative was greatly embellished.

    https://www.unz.com/article/great-variance/


    Reports of Russian persecution of Jews by Joseph Jacobs in The Times were credited as sparking the pogrom controversy in January 1882. They prompted meetings at Mansion House and the Guildhall, at which at least £200,000 was donated; these donations were collected into the Mansion House Fund, which the Board of Guardians and other organisations drew upon to help Jews settle in London or travel on to the USA. A Mansion House Committee was formed and was soon renamed the Russo-Jewish Committee, with Julian Goldsmid as chairman and Jacobs as secretary. Fellow journalist and Jewish activist Lucien Wolf amplified Jacobs’ efforts in the press and worked to co-ordinate the efforts of the AJA and the Board of Deputies of British Jews. Bishops, cardinals, authors and celebrities of the day were won to the cause by the atrocity reports.[4]

    Benjamin Disraeli as Prime Minister had narrowly been prevented from starting a war against Russia in 1877-8, and anti-Russian propaganda was already commonplace in parts of the British press.[5]

    According to John Klier the Times “habitually described it as ‘a backward country, which has not yet worked its way to the level of European life’. The paper had begun a low-level campaign against Russian mistreatment of the Jews even before the outbreak of the pogroms.”[6] The Times was at pains to condemn the Russian government at least as early as 1880. The Telegraph, owned by Harry Levy-Lawson, began to promote the same line with even greater fervour. The Jewish World then, between July and October 1881, published reports from an unnamed Special Correspondent which “portrayed the pogroms dramatically, as great in scale and inhuman in their brutality”, including rape and murder of Jews on a large scale across many locations. According to Klier, “[M]any of his claims, such as the enormous number of rapes, are unconfirmed or flatly contradicted by the archival record… His account most resembles a compilation of hearsay evidence, very little of it collected from first-hand observers. His atrocity reports, in particular, must be viewed with extreme caution.”[7]
     
    As a young student I met a Jew from Kiev (who'd left the USSR as was) who said you could be attacked in the street there for being Jewish - but then as a child I was attacked in the street in Wales (by other children) for having an English accent. I've not held it against the entire Welsh nation.

    Replies: @Jack D, @Ben tillman

    You have to understand that pre-WWI Europe had been a mostly peaceful place for a century after Napoleon – the world was not yet inured to genocide or mass death of civilians. The Kishinev Pogrom of 1903 attracted world wide publicity but the casualties were as follows: 49 Jews were killed, 92 seriously injured, and 500 lightly injured. 40 years later that would have been considered a blessing if that’s all that had happened in one day. But by the peaceful standards of 1903, that was a very big deal.

    But the Men of Unz contrarian narrative (American slaves had it great, Jews had it great, etc.) is a bunch of shit. Millions of Jews didn’t leave Russia because it was great.

    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    @Jack D

    Isn't that just the bog-standard "move where the money is?".

    The Tory minister who stopped what in the 90s seemed ever increasing crime (by sending more people to jail), Michael Howard (ne Hecht), was born and raised in what was then a prosperous tin-plate manufacturing area in Wales. In the early to mid-20th century a lot of Jews moved to the coal and steel towns when they were booming. Nearly all gone now along with the synagogues, mostly derelict or repurposed.

    "How Greenbaum Was My Valley"

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_Green_Was_My_Valley_(film)

    Replies: @Jack D

    , @Colin Wright
    @Jack D


    You have to understand that pre-WWI Europe had been a mostly peaceful place for a century after Napoleon – the world was not yet inured to genocide or mass death of civilians. The Kishinev Pogrom of 1903 attracted world wide publicity but the casualties were as follows: 49 Jews were killed, 92 seriously injured, and 500 lightly injured. 40 years later that would have been considered a blessing if that’s all that had happened in one day. But by the peaceful standards of 1903, that was a very big deal...
     
    You're aware Kishinev isn't populated by Russians, right? It's in Moldavia.

    One could blame the Tsars for not properly policing their peoples, I suppose.

    Note also that in the same era, the Tsars were exterminating and expelling the Circassians, attempting to Russify Poland, and presumably doing unspeakable things to the Muslims of Central Asia.

    So why should Jews complain? What's with the unique hatred for Russia?

    Replies: @Jack D

  290. “Demented People of the World Wander Off Alone!!”

  291. It will be pedophilia, just wait and see.

  292. @Almost Missouri

    Are you a person with a three-digit IQ who likes writing down rules and then rewriting them when they don’t work, who likes to tell yourself that you aren’t a slave to your sexual passions like all those underclass rednecks with their “random families”? You are instead an ethical polyamorist.
     
    For what it's worth, I briefly shared an apartment with a three-digit IQ guy who prominently displayed The Ethical Polyamorist or some such title on the coffee table. (It was the first time I saw the phrase, and my initial thought was, "Dude, if you want to step out on your girlfriend, then step out on your girlfriend. You don't need to make a pseudo-philosophical movement out of it!") As it emerged, this ethical polyamory business extended not only beyond plain old monogamy, but beyond gender, race, and perhaps species. The "Ethical Polyamory" title was just lying there as a slightly subtle announcement that you might share his intimacy tonight but tomorrow he'd be sharing his intimacy with _______ [fill in the blank, just don't tell me how you did it, please].

    Now that Steve mentions it, "ethical polyamory" may also have served as a class status marker, sort of like "Effective Altruism" before that FTX weirdo nuked the brand: "I'm not some flyover lowbrow doing random stuff to please my amygdala, there is a method here, people!" A method of cobbled-together hippie vagaries in mutual contradiction, perhaps, but a "method" nonetheless.

    Speaking of new turns of phrase, this is the first I'm seeing this "random families" phrase, though I've seen plenty enough of the actuality, but I didn't know there was a book called that, and from 20 years ago no less, back when the FBI still investigated criminals rather than political opponents, quaint as that sounds now. The book comes with an endorsement from Alex "There Are No Children Here" Kotlowitz, a book I actually have read and can tell you is badly observed and badly written, so if that's the authority on which one reads Random Families, no thanks, but I guess there was (is?) a cultural moment where very white people retail the supposed travails of dusky nobodies for publishing credit.

    And speaking of very white people...


    the polyamorists—who tend to be extremely white, Scott Alexander-level white
     
    "Scott Alexander-level white", lol. Oh wait, is "Scott Alexander-level white" a dog whistle for Ashk mischling...

    Replies: @SFG, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Bill Jones

    back when the FBI still investigated criminals rather than political opponents

    Thanks for the laugh. The FBI was investigating political opponents fr5om day one.

    • Replies: @res
    @Bill Jones

    How about changing it to something like: "back when the FBI still took time out from investigating political opponents to investigate criminals."

  293. @SFG
    @Colin Wright

    Nah, there were plenty of pogroms jn Czarist Russia. It’s been adduced here as a cause of Jewish Russophobia, which I guess I could buy, mostly on account of seeing Fiddler on the Riof as a kid.

    I sided with Ukraine initially but at this point think they’ve probably fought hard enough to keep most of their country and should probably let Putin have the eastern strip full of Russians. Enough dead Ukrainians and Russians already, this has turned into a WW1-style war of attrition where nothing is happening except lots of dead white boys. End it already.

    I have been quiet on this issue mostly because I don’t have that strong sympathies for either side; I think Putin is at fault for starting the war (and yes, I agree we pushed him to this point), but I am not particularly eager to see him humiliated-indeed, it is counterproductive. Always better to give your enemy a way to save face. Putin tells everyone he regathered the Russian people, the Ukrainians repelled the Russian invasion, everyone goes home to their borscht.

    Our leaders really ought to invest in an XBox and play Crusader Kings 2 or Three Kingdoms 15 or something instead of doing it with real people.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Colin Wright, @HA

    ‘Nah, there were plenty of pogroms jn Czarist Russia. It’s been adduced here as a cause of Jewish Russophobia, which I guess I could buy, mostly on account of seeing Fiddler on the Riof as a kid…’

    Yeah, but (a) it’s a fantasy that the Tsarist government incited those pogroms, (b) the actual death tolls ranged from none to a few score (Kishinev, which wasn’t even inhabited by Russians).

    What was the total over half a century? A hundred? Blacks kill three times that many whites in America every year.

    Compare and contrast to the fate the Russian state visited upon the Eastern Germans, the Crimean Tatars, the Circassians. Up to half of these peoples died. Did the Tsars kill two million Jews? Were there vast convoys of Jews, being led off to slavery and often eventual death in Siberia?

    And there are others who suffered worse than the Jews as well. Consider the repeated (and materially very bloody) suppressions of gentile Polish nationalism over the course of the Nineteenth Century. The fates Stalin visited upon gentile Ukrainians and the peoples of the Baltic.

    And yet, it’s the Jews who hate Russia. It’s curious — and I don’t think it reflects well on the Jews.

  294. @res
    @Anonymous

    It makes more sense once you realize Ukraine changed governments.

    Replies: @Jack D

    It really didn’t have much to do with that. There are a lot of places in E. Europe that have kind of shitty, nationalist, semi-corrupt governments that I don’t really like much. Poland until recently. Hungary, Bosnia, Moldova, etc. The Nazis and Soviets really did a thorough job of destroying civil society in those places – a real double whammy (and in some cases they were really not such hot places to begin with). It’s going to take them decades (if ever) until they recover fully. Ukraine was high up on that list. But all of them (to some extent and including Ukraine) were working on joining the modern Western world. In fits and starts and with differing levels of success but they were working on it. None of these places deserved to be invaded by the Russians (again).

    What some Ukrainians did during the Nazi occupation was shameful and despicable and I will never forget or forgive them for that.

    But that was 80 years ago. Today’s Ukraine is really different. Yes they have a few Neo-Nazis but so do the Russians. Putin was good pals with Utkin, the “Wagner” in Wagner , at least until he killed him (being Putin’s pal is almost as dangerous as being his enemy).

    https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-06c5bbf34be54348efcf4e41a192bf96-lq

    If Putin was looking for Nazis he should have started in the Kremlin.

    When I visited Ukraine nothing untoward happened to us. I was warned that there would be phony speed traps and that the cops would solicit bribes (American dollars preferred!) but no, not even that. No one even added up a restaurant check incorrectly. It was clearly a poor country and a work in progress but they were trying (at least in the big cities) to join the modern world.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    @Jack D


    'What some Ukrainians did during the Nazi occupation was shameful and despicable and I will never forget or forgive them for that.'
     
    I find it interesting to parse this.

    First, you obviously are referring to the participation (often with the alternative of death by starvation in a POW camp) of some Ukrainians in the Holocaust.

    So you would adopt an identity as a Jew, a member of that corporate body, and feel aggrieved. On account of the suffering of other Jews.

    Do you feel guilt over the crimes committed by other Jews against the Ukrainians? After all, a good third (a wildly disproportionate number) of the commissars who carried out the grain confiscations that led to the Ukrainian famine were Jews. What about what other Jews are doing to America right now?

    Do you feel any responsibility for this at all? Or is corporate identity a solely one-way street? Like a favorite shirt, you need only put it on when you feel like it?

    Replies: @Jack D, @J.Ross

  295. @Colin Wright

    For example, the woke are increasingly disgusted by the thought of a 35-year-old man marrying a 25-year-old woman (presumably, a trend driven by all the single 35-year-old women fearing being permanently left on the shelf by single 35-year-old men).
     
    This is an emerging division between the woke and those of us who haven't kept up. In Chile, my wife was disconcerted that the infant a sixty-something year old man was holding was his son. Around here, I've heard recent arrivals reporting with horror examples of middle-aged or even elderly men with young wives.

    And yet, in most times and most places, it's been fairly usual for a man to be ten or twenty years older than his wife. Not mandatory -- but not cause for concern either. For an extreme example, look up Ferdinand de Lesseps. More ordinarily, consider Grover Cleveland and his wife. Grover Cleveland was 49 when he married Frances Folsom, 21. The wedding was held in the White House.

    The Romans (at some point in their long history) held that a man should wait until his early thirties to wed; the wife should be eleven.

    Perhaps that's a bit extreme.

    Replies: @William Badwhite

    More ordinarily, consider Grover Cleveland and his wife. Grover Cleveland was 49 when he married Frances Folsom, 21. The wedding was held in the White House.

    Robert E. Lee’s corps commander James Longstreet married his 2nd wife when he was 76 and she was 34. She lived long enough to work at a B29 plant near Atlanta during WW2.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_Dortch_Longstreet

    Agree: Johann Ricke

    • Thanks: Colin Wright
  296. @Jack D
    @YetAnotherAnon

    You have to understand that pre-WWI Europe had been a mostly peaceful place for a century after Napoleon - the world was not yet inured to genocide or mass death of civilians. The Kishinev Pogrom of 1903 attracted world wide publicity but the casualties were as follows: 49 Jews were killed, 92 seriously injured, and 500 lightly injured. 40 years later that would have been considered a blessing if that's all that had happened in one day. But by the peaceful standards of 1903, that was a very big deal.

    But the Men of Unz contrarian narrative (American slaves had it great, Jews had it great, etc.) is a bunch of shit. Millions of Jews didn't leave Russia because it was great.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Colin Wright

    Isn’t that just the bog-standard “move where the money is?”.

    The Tory minister who stopped what in the 90s seemed ever increasing crime (by sending more people to jail), Michael Howard (ne Hecht), was born and raised in what was then a prosperous tin-plate manufacturing area in Wales. In the early to mid-20th century a lot of Jews moved to the coal and steel towns when they were booming. Nearly all gone now along with the synagogues, mostly derelict or repurposed.

    “How Greenbaum Was My Valley”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_Green_Was_My_Valley_(film)

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @YetAnotherAnon


    Isn’t that just the bog-standard “move where the money is?”.
     
    No. It's just like the desperate people today who risk their life on leaky boats to cross the Mediterranean. People are not doing this to get a slightly better paying job but because their lives are hopeless and they feel as if they have nothing to lose.

    Maybe you move from Birmingham to Swansea because it's a booming area and then move to London when the area declines but you don't sell everything you own and get on a boat with only a suitcase and go to a country where you don't know anyone and can't speak the language unless things are pretty bad (most of the time).

    This was not true 100% of the time but it was most often true. In one branch of my wife's family, they actually came with money and they combined their trip to leave the Pale with a tour of Egypt on the way but this was by far the exception - out of all the Jews that I know this is the only story that I have heard that was anything like that. Most people with money stayed and died later in the Holocaust.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @YetAnotherAnon

  297. anonymous[823] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous
    @TWS

    Jack D probably covers a wider breadth of subject matter than any other single commenter on this blog.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @TWS, @anonymous, @J.Ross, @BB753

    Jack D probably covers a wider breadth of subject matter than any other single commenter on this blog.

    He is a greater content lifter than any other single commenter on this blog. Not only does he copy from wikipedia but from various publications without attribution. For example, when the US began supplying the Javelin to Ukraine, the Financial Times published an article explaining how it works. Jack D spent a lot of effort rewriting that article and posting it here as his own comment. About that time, when an Su-25 was shot down and video of the pilot ejecting was posted on Twitter, Jack D scraped the comment thread and rewrote it as a comment he posted here.
    About then I began ignoring hist posts but I’m sure he has continued to do that as he has always done. He has even scraped and rewrote content I’ve published elsewhere about my own profession and presented it as his own. Why he would expend so much effort just to make comments on Sailer’s blog I can’t imagine.
    He must have extreme self-esteem issues, or perhaps have a gigantic ego that makes him so annoying in life that no one wants to associate with him, so he comes to this blog because his comments don’t get blocked and he can strut and preen to his heart’s desire.
    Enjoy his posts if you like, but keep in mind that when he writes — or rewrites — he often misunderstands or gets things wrong. So whether he is posting about pot-bellied stoves, Iraqi air defenses in the Iraq War, movie studios in Hollywood or learning foreign languages, he doesn’t know what he is talking about and is just another time-wasting blowhard.

    • Thanks: William Badwhite, J.Ross, TWS
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @anonymous

    Yes, I'm well aware Jack isn't actually an expert on everything and frequently paraphrases. I've also noticed his not infrequent errors (some due to his biases, some due to the absurdly high rate at which he churns out text, some due to it not actually being possible to be an expert on everything.) Still, he clearly does know a lot (if not everything), writes very well, and greatly contributes to keeping the discussion here thought-provoking and entertaining.

    That said, I hope he is better at admitting fault in real life than he is here!

    , @New Dealer
    @anonymous

    That explains much. I scanned past him for a time. His comments on my few posts were not incorrect but were off or uninteresting. When he posted on how to choose the best non-stick frying pan, I marked him in my mind. Next, I noticed that he posted a lot of comments on a lot of topics, tending towards the tendentious or irrelevant. Now, I'll resume scanning past.

    , @Mike Tre
    @anonymous

    There was a commenter that went by Paperback Writer who was very good at exposing Jack D's scam a couple years back, but has himself stopped commenting for at least a year now.

    It's been obvious for years and years that Jack D is a disingenuous fraud, but the "in crowd" here step on each other's necks to be first to engage with him. It's bizarre.

    Replies: @SFG, @res

    , @J.Ross
    @anonymous

    I plant lie in ground, watch grow into truth

    , @Bernard
    @anonymous


    So whether he is posting about pot-bellied stoves, Iraqi air defenses in the Iraq War, movie studios in Hollywood or learning foreign languages, he doesn’t know what he is talking about and is just another time-wasting blowhard.
     
    I think you’re being a little harsh, though I acknowledge Jack is a know it all. He’s a great resource if you don’t want to do the research on non political subjects. I’ve enjoyed some of his insights on practical matters.

    I like the banter he creates. Responses to his posts are often quite educating and thoughtful.

    Replies: @Cagey Beast

  298. @Jack D
    @YetAnotherAnon

    You have to understand that pre-WWI Europe had been a mostly peaceful place for a century after Napoleon - the world was not yet inured to genocide or mass death of civilians. The Kishinev Pogrom of 1903 attracted world wide publicity but the casualties were as follows: 49 Jews were killed, 92 seriously injured, and 500 lightly injured. 40 years later that would have been considered a blessing if that's all that had happened in one day. But by the peaceful standards of 1903, that was a very big deal.

    But the Men of Unz contrarian narrative (American slaves had it great, Jews had it great, etc.) is a bunch of shit. Millions of Jews didn't leave Russia because it was great.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Colin Wright

    You have to understand that pre-WWI Europe had been a mostly peaceful place for a century after Napoleon – the world was not yet inured to genocide or mass death of civilians. The Kishinev Pogrom of 1903 attracted world wide publicity but the casualties were as follows: 49 Jews were killed, 92 seriously injured, and 500 lightly injured. 40 years later that would have been considered a blessing if that’s all that had happened in one day. But by the peaceful standards of 1903, that was a very big deal…

    You’re aware Kishinev isn’t populated by Russians, right? It’s in Moldavia.

    One could blame the Tsars for not properly policing their peoples, I suppose.

    Note also that in the same era, the Tsars were exterminating and expelling the Circassians, attempting to Russify Poland, and presumably doing unspeakable things to the Muslims of Central Asia.

    So why should Jews complain? What’s with the unique hatred for Russia?

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Colin Wright

    In 1903 Kishinev was the territory of the Russian Empire. There were other pogroms in Ukrainian cities and throughout the Pale of Settlement.

    Not so much in Russia proper because there were very few Jews in Russia proper (depending on whether you consider Russian speaking cities like Odessa Russia proper or not) since they were legally forbidden to live outside the Pale without a special permit which was not easy to get.

  299. @Ebony Obelisk
    @Franz

    If you’re a 30 year old cos bet white male and you’re it harried have multiple children age height six fighters then you are a lowers

    Replies: @kaganovitch, @Je Suis Omar Mateen

    “If you’re a 30 year old cos bet white male and you’re it harried have multiple children age height six fighters then you are a lowers”

    I’ve been telling my mother this exact same thing for many decades.

    • Agree: Colin Wright
  300. @Jack D
    @res

    It really didn't have much to do with that. There are a lot of places in E. Europe that have kind of shitty, nationalist, semi-corrupt governments that I don't really like much. Poland until recently. Hungary, Bosnia, Moldova, etc. The Nazis and Soviets really did a thorough job of destroying civil society in those places - a real double whammy (and in some cases they were really not such hot places to begin with). It's going to take them decades (if ever) until they recover fully. Ukraine was high up on that list. But all of them (to some extent and including Ukraine) were working on joining the modern Western world. In fits and starts and with differing levels of success but they were working on it. None of these places deserved to be invaded by the Russians (again).

    What some Ukrainians did during the Nazi occupation was shameful and despicable and I will never forget or forgive them for that.

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b0/%D0%9F%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B4_%D0%B2_%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B5_%28%D0%98%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE-%D0%A4%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA%29_%D0%B2_%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C_%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B0_%D0%B3%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BB-%D0%B3%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B0_%D0%9F%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%88%D0%B8_%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B9%D1%85%D1%81%D0%BB%D1%8F%D0%B9%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0_%D0%93%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%B0_%D0%A4%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_2.jpeg

    But that was 80 years ago. Today's Ukraine is really different. Yes they have a few Neo-Nazis but so do the Russians. Putin was good pals with Utkin, the "Wagner" in Wagner , at least until he killed him (being Putin's pal is almost as dangerous as being his enemy).

    https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-06c5bbf34be54348efcf4e41a192bf96-lq

    If Putin was looking for Nazis he should have started in the Kremlin.

    When I visited Ukraine nothing untoward happened to us. I was warned that there would be phony speed traps and that the cops would solicit bribes (American dollars preferred!) but no, not even that. No one even added up a restaurant check incorrectly. It was clearly a poor country and a work in progress but they were trying (at least in the big cities) to join the modern world.

    Replies: @Colin Wright

    ‘What some Ukrainians did during the Nazi occupation was shameful and despicable and I will never forget or forgive them for that.’

    I find it interesting to parse this.

    First, you obviously are referring to the participation (often with the alternative of death by starvation in a POW camp) of some Ukrainians in the Holocaust.

    So you would adopt an identity as a Jew, a member of that corporate body, and feel aggrieved. On account of the suffering of other Jews.

    Do you feel guilt over the crimes committed by other Jews against the Ukrainians? After all, a good third (a wildly disproportionate number) of the commissars who carried out the grain confiscations that led to the Ukrainian famine were Jews. What about what other Jews are doing to America right now?

    Do you feel any responsibility for this at all? Or is corporate identity a solely one-way street? Like a favorite shirt, you need only put it on when you feel like it?

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Colin Wright


    First, you obviously are referring to the participation (often with the alternative of death by starvation in a POW camp) of some Ukrainians in the Holocaust.
     
    Do the marchers in this photo look like they are starving and being forced to march in this parade?

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b0/%D0%9F%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B4_%D0%B2_%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B5_%28%D0%98%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE-%D0%A4%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA%29_%D0%B2_%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C_%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B0_%D0%B3%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BB-%D0%B3%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B0_%D0%9F%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%88%D0%B8_%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B9%D1%85%D1%81%D0%BB%D1%8F%D0%B9%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0_%D0%93%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%B0_%D0%A4%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_2.jpeg

    They look pretty well fed to me. And they were marking specifically under the banner of Ukrainian nationalism.

    My father was in a situation where he really was starving and in a camp and he could have collaborated with the Germans as a kapo and he didn't. He would have rather died. When he was on his deathbed one of the last things he said to me (in Yiddish) was " I want you to know that I did not do wrong to anyone." He meant specifically this.

    The "Jewish" commissars were no longer Jewish at all. They were converts to the new religion of Communism. The did not act as Jews but as Communists. They denounced Judaism along with all other religions as the opiate of the masses and they closed synagogues and imprisoned rabbis. I feel no more responsible for their actions as a Jew than I would if they had take vows as Catholic priests and participated in the Inquisition (that happened too).

    Replies: @Colin Wright, @Colin Wright

    , @J.Ross
    @Colin Wright

    Ukrainian Nazism, which is doubted only by people who don't know anything about the Ukraine, had as its greatest argument the immediately foregoing and soon reinstated alternative totalitarian regime, which among other things used mass starvation as a punishment. See also the Estonians semi-recently dedicating a statue of a soldier wearing a certain pattern of helmet.

  301. @Anonymous
    @TWS

    Jack D probably covers a wider breadth of subject matter than any other single commenter on this blog.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @TWS, @anonymous, @J.Ross, @BB753

    That’s not purely an advantage. He is good on subjects he understands, but predictable and wildly wrong on certain personal bugbears. Dr Zaius is very similar, but they disagree heatedly sometimes.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @J.Ross

    Lol, who is Dr Zaius in this analogy?

    Replies: @J.Ross

  302. @New Dealer
    @AnotherDad

    Yes, polyamory would be terrible for children.

    There is another huge drawback. In a normal household of man, woman, couple of kids, you can never find a damned thing. Somebody didn't put the can opener back, you find it a few days later under the sink. Or one of the grownups decides to reorganize the kitchen cupboards again. You find your razor in the toilet tank and your shaving cream in the backyard. Your best sweater is missing for some reason. Your socket set is no longer with your tools, but somehow ended up with the pots and pans.

    All that would be exponentially worse in a polyamorous household.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Muggles, @DenverGregg, @hhsiii, @Colin Wright

    ‘…You find your razor in the toilet tank and your shaving cream in the backyard. Your best sweater is missing for some reason. Your socket set is no longer with your tools, but somehow ended up with the pots and pans…’

    You exaggerate, but this is a true story.

    Take my wife…please.

    So after a move she unpacks, then is out of town for a few weeks a little later.

    I can’t find anything. She says she put it all away logically. I eventually find the butter dish.

    It’s in the upstairs bathroom.

    • LOL: New Dealer
  303. @Anon7
    @Gruesome Newsom

    I don't know if it will be the "New Thing" but the current thing is leftist state governors trying to convince people to take migrants into their homes.

    So, combining the trend of millennial children moving back into their parent's McMansions, there are still empty rooms. So, fill them with migrants, who can help take care of the aging parents, and since these migrants will collect our tax dollars, they can also contribute some money.

    New business model.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @David Davenport, @Colin Wright

    So, combining the trend of millennial children moving back into their parent’s McMansions, there are still empty rooms. So, fill them with migrants, who can help take care of the aging parents, and since these migrants will collect our tax dollars, they can also contribute some money.

    Migrants are a net drain on American tax dollars. That’s a CommieCrat idea.

    Better business model: Encourage old American stock children or grandchildren to have more babies, and maybe live with the old folks. This was a common practice in the old days.

  304. @New Dealer
    @New Dealer

    The steaming White Rural Rage post on X.

    Another metric. The original post by the author of the new Protocols of the Elders of Albion got 468 likes. The most liked negative reply (by Christopher Rufo) got 3900 likes.

    It's frightening to remember that but for Musk none of those almost 4700 replies opposing antiwhite hatred would have appeared.

    Replies: @New Dealer, @Frau Katze

    Protocols of the Elders of Albion

    Hilarious!

    • Replies: @res
    @Frau Katze

    An earlier usage (2019).
    https://www.unz.com/isteve/genuine-historians-denounce-nyts-1619-project/#comment-3622857

    Unsurprisingly, the Amazon reviews of the book are bimodal at one and five stars. Interesting to see the different "helpful" votes. I think the most helpful review wins that thread though with this title: "Loxism at its finest."

    https://www.amazon.com/White-Rural-Rage-American-Democracy/dp/0593729145

    P.S. Anyone want to bet on whether the review from "pinkvock" is sincere (accurately representing the reviewer) or not?

    Replies: @New Dealer, @MEH 0910, @Frau Katze

  305. @Reg Cæsar
    @Frau Katze


    In Canada, where handguns are uncommon, men are safer than in the US.
     
    "In Canada, where [fill in the blank] are uncommon, men are safer than in the US."


    Handguns were far less common in the city I left than they are among my new small-town neighbors, many of whom own one or two. But somehow I feel safer out here. What's scary is all the Silverados-- if one of those hits you, you're toast. (City buses are deadly, too, but those are operated by professionals, who are sober as well.)

    Canada ranks #7 in gun ownership, while Mexico is way down at #60. Tell me you'd feel safer in Tijuana than in Victoria!


    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estimated_number_of_civilian_guns_per_capita_by_country

    Replies: @Frau Katze

    Hunting rifles are very common in Canada. Handguns, much less.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @Frau Katze


    Hunting rifles are very common in Canada. Handguns, much less.
     
    The difference is not in the guns. It's in the hands.
  306. @Colin Wright
    @Frau Katze


    In Canada, where handguns are uncommon, men are safer than in the US. But female disadvantage is the same.
     
    If you examine the numbers, I think you'll find the difference has more to do with a paucity of blacks than with a paucity of handguns.

    We're awash in guns around here; I suspect the average male citizen must have about four -- two of which would be pistols. Seriously: it's absurd. I think Ian and Gary both have guns. My daughter has three: a Glock in 9mm, an AR-15 clone, and a pump shotgun. I have four. Frank has at least eight. I mentioned this to the guy at the gun store. He said that's nothing; he has customers with twenty. People have pistols for the car, and pistols for the house. They've got their gun, and one that's light enough for the little woman to use. There's a deer rifle, an assault rifle, and a shotgun. What do we want with all these guns?

    And yet, murder is virtually unheard of. Very few blacks, you see.

    Replies: @Frau Katze

    If you examine the numbers, I think you’ll find the difference has more to do with a paucity of blacks than with a paucity of handguns.

    OK. Fortunately I have no experience living around blacks.

  307. Anonymous[418] • Disclaimer says:
    @Peter Akuleyev
    @Hypnotoad666

    It's simply insane to say Russia is "on the rise". Yes, the economy is overheating due to military spending but nothing productive is happening there and the second the war ends that economy will collapse into hyperinflation. We've seen this story many times in many countries.

    The main, cynical, reason for Europeans to attack Russia now is that Russia is extraordinarily weak at the moment and now is the time to take advantage of that before China can. Much like European powers raced to carve up the dying Ottoman Empire, there is a battle between the West, China and increasingly India to dominate Russia. Putin is fighting a rearguard action but destroying the Russian military and the Russian economy in the process.

    Replies: @Jack D, @Anonymous

    ‘India dominate Russia.’

    Utterly ridiculous that anyone can believe this. Russia will forever be the hard man from the cold north west who put the ‘Kush’ in ‘Hindu Kush’.

    On the other hand, India dominating the UK, Australia and Canada is, more or less, a racing certainty.
    India dominating the USA is moot at this point.

    • Replies: @Looger
    @Anonymous


    On the other hand, India dominating the UK, Australia and Canada is, more or less, a racing certainty.
     
    How are they going to "dominate" anyone when they are here as a hammer used by 30% libtards and Jews against the other 70% of the white population?

    When the free money from White people runs out they will be living in squalor conditions in a transplanted India.

    When there isn't a white government taking money from us and giving it to them, they will simply revert to what they were before they got here - India.

    Once this 70% of people wakes up, as in when real privation and shortages, when they lose their houses / mortgages, the "nonstop" supply of resources towards Indians here will cease - if only because the rotten government structure itself will collapse.

    Canada's banking system, which uses the charter "private" banks to djinn up all the mortgage debt and new currency, almost went out of business during covid when old people withdrew their money in droves.

    The biggest difference between Trudeau Senior's use of the War Measures Act and his stepson, is that Pierre relied on the army. Justin was advised smartly and he COULD NOT TRUST CANADA'S ARMY to even secure Parliament Hill.

    No currency and no army do not make a country - if you think the Indian "domination" of whites here in the west can survive without the anti-white governments in place, then don't get too attached to those governments. They are houses of cards and the wind is blowing.

    I started two Amazon buildings, the first one took two years to become Indian-dominated, the second one started that way. Neither are in any way functional. Indians cannot dominate their way out of a wet paper bag unless there's a white government program showing them how.

    , @Jack D
    @Anonymous


    Russia will forever be the hard man from the cold north west who put the ‘Kush’ in ‘Hindu Kush’.
     
    You've been reading to much Putinist propaganda. Russia wins every war, except for the ones that end in humiliating defeat which they conveniently forget about. Russians thought that they were hard men from the cold north west when they went to Afghanistan. That didn't work out. Russians thought that they were hard men from the cold north west when they took on the Japanese Navy in the Russo-Japanese War and that didn't work out either.

    Mountains are really non-discriminatory - they will kill anyone and don't have a special animus toward Hindus.

    Replies: @Anonymous

  308. @Anonymous
    @TWS

    Jack D probably covers a wider breadth of subject matter than any other single commenter on this blog.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @TWS, @anonymous, @J.Ross, @BB753

    That’s Wikipedia for you!

  309. @Colin Wright
    @Jack D


    You have to understand that pre-WWI Europe had been a mostly peaceful place for a century after Napoleon – the world was not yet inured to genocide or mass death of civilians. The Kishinev Pogrom of 1903 attracted world wide publicity but the casualties were as follows: 49 Jews were killed, 92 seriously injured, and 500 lightly injured. 40 years later that would have been considered a blessing if that’s all that had happened in one day. But by the peaceful standards of 1903, that was a very big deal...
     
    You're aware Kishinev isn't populated by Russians, right? It's in Moldavia.

    One could blame the Tsars for not properly policing their peoples, I suppose.

    Note also that in the same era, the Tsars were exterminating and expelling the Circassians, attempting to Russify Poland, and presumably doing unspeakable things to the Muslims of Central Asia.

    So why should Jews complain? What's with the unique hatred for Russia?

    Replies: @Jack D

    In 1903 Kishinev was the territory of the Russian Empire. There were other pogroms in Ukrainian cities and throughout the Pale of Settlement.

    Not so much in Russia proper because there were very few Jews in Russia proper (depending on whether you consider Russian speaking cities like Odessa Russia proper or not) since they were legally forbidden to live outside the Pale without a special permit which was not easy to get.

  310. @Colin Wright
    @Jack D


    'What some Ukrainians did during the Nazi occupation was shameful and despicable and I will never forget or forgive them for that.'
     
    I find it interesting to parse this.

    First, you obviously are referring to the participation (often with the alternative of death by starvation in a POW camp) of some Ukrainians in the Holocaust.

    So you would adopt an identity as a Jew, a member of that corporate body, and feel aggrieved. On account of the suffering of other Jews.

    Do you feel guilt over the crimes committed by other Jews against the Ukrainians? After all, a good third (a wildly disproportionate number) of the commissars who carried out the grain confiscations that led to the Ukrainian famine were Jews. What about what other Jews are doing to America right now?

    Do you feel any responsibility for this at all? Or is corporate identity a solely one-way street? Like a favorite shirt, you need only put it on when you feel like it?

    Replies: @Jack D, @J.Ross

    First, you obviously are referring to the participation (often with the alternative of death by starvation in a POW camp) of some Ukrainians in the Holocaust.

    Do the marchers in this photo look like they are starving and being forced to march in this parade?

    They look pretty well fed to me. And they were marking specifically under the banner of Ukrainian nationalism.

    My father was in a situation where he really was starving and in a camp and he could have collaborated with the Germans as a kapo and he didn’t. He would have rather died. When he was on his deathbed one of the last things he said to me (in Yiddish) was ” I want you to know that I did not do wrong to anyone.” He meant specifically this.

    The “Jewish” commissars were no longer Jewish at all. They were converts to the new religion of Communism. The did not act as Jews but as Communists. They denounced Judaism along with all other religions as the opiate of the masses and they closed synagogues and imprisoned rabbis. I feel no more responsible for their actions as a Jew than I would if they had take vows as Catholic priests and participated in the Inquisition (that happened too).

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    @Jack D

    I think you're evading the issue. You cheerfully join in a sense of collective grievance if Jews are victimized or you imagine them to have been victimized. If Jews sin, you feel no guilt. They were no longer part of the collective.

    We could go through it all -- but we both know the outcome. In every case, either the Jews weren't acting as Jews, or they at least meant well, or it didn't happen.

    How can you expect anyone to respect you? It's all the most shameless mendacity. It's not even flattering to other Jews. I'm fully aware you're not an especially fair example. Others may not be.

    Replies: @Jack D

    , @Colin Wright
    @Jack D


    Do the marchers in this photo look like they are starving and being forced to march in this parade?

     

    Those? I feel sorry for them. They don't particularly want to return to a Galicia lorded over by Poles, and they know they don't want the Communists back. They're hoping the Germans will let them have a decent life.

    They would have been disappointed -- but I don't condemn them.

    Replies: @Jack D

  311. Anonymous[239] • Disclaimer says:
    @anonymous
    @Anonymous


    Jack D probably covers a wider breadth of subject matter than any other single commenter on this blog.
     
    He is a greater content lifter than any other single commenter on this blog. Not only does he copy from wikipedia but from various publications without attribution. For example, when the US began supplying the Javelin to Ukraine, the Financial Times published an article explaining how it works. Jack D spent a lot of effort rewriting that article and posting it here as his own comment. About that time, when an Su-25 was shot down and video of the pilot ejecting was posted on Twitter, Jack D scraped the comment thread and rewrote it as a comment he posted here.
    About then I began ignoring hist posts but I'm sure he has continued to do that as he has always done. He has even scraped and rewrote content I've published elsewhere about my own profession and presented it as his own. Why he would expend so much effort just to make comments on Sailer's blog I can't imagine.
    He must have extreme self-esteem issues, or perhaps have a gigantic ego that makes him so annoying in life that no one wants to associate with him, so he comes to this blog because his comments don't get blocked and he can strut and preen to his heart's desire.
    Enjoy his posts if you like, but keep in mind that when he writes -- or rewrites -- he often misunderstands or gets things wrong. So whether he is posting about pot-bellied stoves, Iraqi air defenses in the Iraq War, movie studios in Hollywood or learning foreign languages, he doesn't know what he is talking about and is just another time-wasting blowhard.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @New Dealer, @Mike Tre, @J.Ross, @Bernard

    Yes, I’m well aware Jack isn’t actually an expert on everything and frequently paraphrases. I’ve also noticed his not infrequent errors (some due to his biases, some due to the absurdly high rate at which he churns out text, some due to it not actually being possible to be an expert on everything.) Still, he clearly does know a lot (if not everything), writes very well, and greatly contributes to keeping the discussion here thought-provoking and entertaining.

    That said, I hope he is better at admitting fault in real life than he is here!

  312. @J.Ross
    @Anonymous

    That's not purely an advantage. He is good on subjects he understands, but predictable and wildly wrong on certain personal bugbears. Dr Zaius is very similar, but they disagree heatedly sometimes.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    Lol, who is Dr Zaius in this analogy?

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @Anonymous

    Art Deco. Refers to a recent and very good iSteve comment.
    https://www.unz.com/isteve/st-louis-post-dispatch-st-louis-deadly-traffic-crisis-isnt-that-complicated-enforce-the-law/#comment-6440140

  313. @YetAnotherAnon
    @Jack D

    Isn't that just the bog-standard "move where the money is?".

    The Tory minister who stopped what in the 90s seemed ever increasing crime (by sending more people to jail), Michael Howard (ne Hecht), was born and raised in what was then a prosperous tin-plate manufacturing area in Wales. In the early to mid-20th century a lot of Jews moved to the coal and steel towns when they were booming. Nearly all gone now along with the synagogues, mostly derelict or repurposed.

    "How Greenbaum Was My Valley"

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_Green_Was_My_Valley_(film)

    Replies: @Jack D

    Isn’t that just the bog-standard “move where the money is?”.

    No. It’s just like the desperate people today who risk their life on leaky boats to cross the Mediterranean. People are not doing this to get a slightly better paying job but because their lives are hopeless and they feel as if they have nothing to lose.

    Maybe you move from Birmingham to Swansea because it’s a booming area and then move to London when the area declines but you don’t sell everything you own and get on a boat with only a suitcase and go to a country where you don’t know anyone and can’t speak the language unless things are pretty bad (most of the time).

    This was not true 100% of the time but it was most often true. In one branch of my wife’s family, they actually came with money and they combined their trip to leave the Pale with a tour of Egypt on the way but this was by far the exception – out of all the Jews that I know this is the only story that I have heard that was anything like that. Most people with money stayed and died later in the Holocaust.

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @Jack D


    People are not doing this to get a slightly better paying job but because their lives are hopeless and they feel as if they have nothing to lose.
     
    Debunked, they're rich, and both pay human traffickers respectable sums and go into lifelong debt to drug smugglers.
    , @YetAnotherAnon
    @Jack D

    Depends what's in the suitcase of course.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bearer_bond


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haavara_Agreement

    How many left Germany under this arrangement? Wiki is schtum, though we have this:


    Jewish population (174,610 in 1931, rising to 384,078 in 1936)
     
  314. @Anonymous
    @Peter Akuleyev

    'India dominate Russia.'

    Utterly ridiculous that anyone can believe this. Russia will forever be the hard man from the cold north west who put the 'Kush' in 'Hindu Kush'.

    On the other hand, India dominating the UK, Australia and Canada is, more or less, a racing certainty.
    India dominating the USA is moot at this point.

    Replies: @Looger, @Jack D

    On the other hand, India dominating the UK, Australia and Canada is, more or less, a racing certainty.

    How are they going to “dominate” anyone when they are here as a hammer used by 30% libtards and Jews against the other 70% of the white population?

    When the free money from White people runs out they will be living in squalor conditions in a transplanted India.

    When there isn’t a white government taking money from us and giving it to them, they will simply revert to what they were before they got here – India.

    Once this 70% of people wakes up, as in when real privation and shortages, when they lose their houses / mortgages, the “nonstop” supply of resources towards Indians here will cease – if only because the rotten government structure itself will collapse.

    Canada’s banking system, which uses the charter “private” banks to djinn up all the mortgage debt and new currency, almost went out of business during covid when old people withdrew their money in droves.

    The biggest difference between Trudeau Senior’s use of the War Measures Act and his stepson, is that Pierre relied on the army. Justin was advised smartly and he COULD NOT TRUST CANADA’S ARMY to even secure Parliament Hill.

    No currency and no army do not make a country – if you think the Indian “domination” of whites here in the west can survive without the anti-white governments in place, then don’t get too attached to those governments. They are houses of cards and the wind is blowing.

    I started two Amazon buildings, the first one took two years to become Indian-dominated, the second one started that way. Neither are in any way functional. Indians cannot dominate their way out of a wet paper bag unless there’s a white government program showing them how.

  315. @Jack D
    @YetAnotherAnon


    Isn’t that just the bog-standard “move where the money is?”.
     
    No. It's just like the desperate people today who risk their life on leaky boats to cross the Mediterranean. People are not doing this to get a slightly better paying job but because their lives are hopeless and they feel as if they have nothing to lose.

    Maybe you move from Birmingham to Swansea because it's a booming area and then move to London when the area declines but you don't sell everything you own and get on a boat with only a suitcase and go to a country where you don't know anyone and can't speak the language unless things are pretty bad (most of the time).

    This was not true 100% of the time but it was most often true. In one branch of my wife's family, they actually came with money and they combined their trip to leave the Pale with a tour of Egypt on the way but this was by far the exception - out of all the Jews that I know this is the only story that I have heard that was anything like that. Most people with money stayed and died later in the Holocaust.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @YetAnotherAnon

    People are not doing this to get a slightly better paying job but because their lives are hopeless and they feel as if they have nothing to lose.

    Debunked, they’re rich, and both pay human traffickers respectable sums and go into lifelong debt to drug smugglers.

  316. @Colin Wright
    @Jack D


    'What some Ukrainians did during the Nazi occupation was shameful and despicable and I will never forget or forgive them for that.'
     
    I find it interesting to parse this.

    First, you obviously are referring to the participation (often with the alternative of death by starvation in a POW camp) of some Ukrainians in the Holocaust.

    So you would adopt an identity as a Jew, a member of that corporate body, and feel aggrieved. On account of the suffering of other Jews.

    Do you feel guilt over the crimes committed by other Jews against the Ukrainians? After all, a good third (a wildly disproportionate number) of the commissars who carried out the grain confiscations that led to the Ukrainian famine were Jews. What about what other Jews are doing to America right now?

    Do you feel any responsibility for this at all? Or is corporate identity a solely one-way street? Like a favorite shirt, you need only put it on when you feel like it?

    Replies: @Jack D, @J.Ross

    Ukrainian Nazism, which is doubted only by people who don’t know anything about the Ukraine, had as its greatest argument the immediately foregoing and soon reinstated alternative totalitarian regime, which among other things used mass starvation as a punishment. See also the Estonians semi-recently dedicating a statue of a soldier wearing a certain pattern of helmet.

  317. @Looger
    @Frau Katze


    Woman are physically weaker than men. If a woman ends up at the mercy of a psychopath she’s doomed.

    As a female you must try to avoid that scenario your entire life. True, most women won’t end up murdered by a psycho but the possibility is always there.

    In Canada, where handguns are uncommon, men are safer than in the US. But female disadvantage is the same.
     
    And yet, in Canada, women have voted more immigrant men into the country, who then rape and murder them.

    Curious.

    I didn't understand the dynamic until my ex-wife, immigration consultant, got very angry with me because a woman was raped and murdered at Franklin Station in Calgary. As she harangued me about this I began to wonder how many of the men in the gang were from countries that she brought people in from.

    Women with political power is the scariest thing imaginable. I thought marrying a "smart woman" was a good idea - it ended up making me realize that they were given political power in order to destroy the west.

    You say women fear being killed by a psycho, ok fine I can understand that. Traditionally that meant women had chaparones. But now women want to have their cake and eat it too, they want to feel independent but still they are scared. So they vote for more "male attention" subconciously and they end up with more "psychos" (uncivilized men with zero restraint).

    It's quite the mental prisons you women have there, it'd be a shame if you got voting power and externalized your internal contradictions into a hellscape society.

    A real shame that would be.

    Replies: @Frau Katze

    I think you are correct that women trend more liberal than men. But not this woman.

  318. HA says:
    @SFG
    @Colin Wright

    Nah, there were plenty of pogroms jn Czarist Russia. It’s been adduced here as a cause of Jewish Russophobia, which I guess I could buy, mostly on account of seeing Fiddler on the Riof as a kid.

    I sided with Ukraine initially but at this point think they’ve probably fought hard enough to keep most of their country and should probably let Putin have the eastern strip full of Russians. Enough dead Ukrainians and Russians already, this has turned into a WW1-style war of attrition where nothing is happening except lots of dead white boys. End it already.

    I have been quiet on this issue mostly because I don’t have that strong sympathies for either side; I think Putin is at fault for starting the war (and yes, I agree we pushed him to this point), but I am not particularly eager to see him humiliated-indeed, it is counterproductive. Always better to give your enemy a way to save face. Putin tells everyone he regathered the Russian people, the Ukrainians repelled the Russian invasion, everyone goes home to their borscht.

    Our leaders really ought to invest in an XBox and play Crusader Kings 2 or Three Kingdoms 15 or something instead of doing it with real people.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Colin Wright, @HA

    “and should probably let Putin have the eastern strip full of Russians.”

    Maybe it’ll come to that at some point, but for now, why would Putin agree to only that? As I noted earlier:

    Right now, even if Zelensky agrees to negotiate, there is no evidence that Putin wants to negotiate, that he wants to stop fighting, or that he has ever wanted to stop fighting. And yes, according to Western officials who have periodic conversations with their Russian counterparts, attempts have been made to find out.

    Nor is there any evidence that Putin wants to partition Ukraine, keeping only the territories he currently occupies and allowing the rest to prosper like South Korea. His goal remains the destruction of Ukraine—all of Ukraine—and his allies and propagandists are still talking about how, once they achieve this goal, they will expand their empire further… calling Poland Russia’s “historical enemy” and threatening Poles with the loss of their state too.

    That was written in November — has anything really changed to the extent that Putin would agree to something even before seeing whether Trump will win next November?

  319. @Rich
    @R.G. Camara

    Well, it is different. A grown man can physically force a 15 or 16 year old girl to have sex with him, a grown woman can't physically force a teenage boy to have sex with her. Biologically impossible. And where I grew up, a teenaged boy is going to be overjoyed at having an older woman coming onto him. It should be treated differently because it is different.

    True pedophilia, which is sex with a pre-pubescent child, should of course be punished severely, male or female. I favor the death penalty, but life in prison is probably the best we can hope for in this effeminate society.

    Replies: @SomeGuy852

    That’s not different unless it’s forced which isn’t often. Teenaged girls will likely like the attention of the older man as well. That’s the more natural scenario.

  320. It’s funny how girls/women have to be singled out when it’s something that definitely effects boys as well.

  321. @Frau Katze
    @New Dealer


    Protocols of the Elders of Albion
     
    Hilarious!

    Replies: @res

    An earlier usage (2019).
    https://www.unz.com/isteve/genuine-historians-denounce-nyts-1619-project/#comment-3622857

    Unsurprisingly, the Amazon reviews of the book are bimodal at one and five stars. Interesting to see the different “helpful” votes. I think the most helpful review wins that thread though with this title: “Loxism at its finest.”

    P.S. Anyone want to bet on whether the review from “pinkvock” is sincere (accurately representing the reviewer) or not?

    • Replies: @New Dealer
    @res

    I went to Amazon. No review by "pinkvock." Comments are being ethnically cleansed:


    Amazon has noticed unusual reviewing activity on this product. Due to this activity, we have limited this product to verified purchase reviews.
     

    Replies: @Frau Katze, @res

    , @MEH 0910
    @res

    NYT:
    https://archive.ph/CkZmW


    The Mystery of White Rural Rage
    By Paul Krugman
    Feb. 26, 2024
    [...]
    This process and its effects are laid out in devastating, terrifying and baffling detail in “White Rural Rage: The Threat to American Democracy,” a new book by Tom Schaller and Paul Waldman. I say “devastating” because the hardship of rural Americans is real, “terrifying” because the political backlash to this hardship poses a clear and present danger to our democracy and “baffling” because at some level I still don’t get the politics.
     
    https://twitter.com/whstancil/status/1762327623143686315

    Replies: @J.Ross

    , @Frau Katze
    @res

    I don’t like the description on Amazon of “White Rural Rage”


    In White Rural Rage, Tom Schaller and Paul Waldman explore why rural Whites have failed to reap the benefits from their outsize political power and why, as a result, they are the most likely group to abandon democratic norms and traditions. Their rage—stoked daily by Republican politicians and the conservative media—now poses an existential threat to the United States.

    Schaller and Waldman show how vulnerable U.S. democracy has become to rural Whites who, despite legitimate grievances, are increasingly inclined to hold racist and xenophobic beliefs, to believe in conspiracy theories, to accept violence as a legitimate course of political action, and to exhibit antidemocratic tendencies.
     
    They’re racist because they don’t like getting passed over for promotion because they’re white men. And I guess if they don’t like a totally open border they’re xenophobic.

    Replies: @Colin Wright, @deep anonymous

  322. @Bill Jones
    @Almost Missouri


    back when the FBI still investigated criminals rather than political opponents
     
    Thanks for the laugh. The FBI was investigating political opponents fr5om day one.

    Replies: @res

    How about changing it to something like: “back when the FBI still took time out from investigating political opponents to investigate criminals.”

  323. @Bardon Kaldian
    @Muggles

    I just say what he says:

    https://www.israelhayom.com/opinions/its-time-to-isolate-anti-vaxxers-from-the-rest-of-society/

    It's time to isolate anti-vaxxers from the rest of society

    Replies: @HA, @Muggles

    https://www.israelhayom.com/opinions/its-time-to-isolate-anti-vaxxers-from-the-rest-of-society/

    He’s from Haifa. The Haredi anti-vaxx movement is poised to hit Israel especially hard.

  324. @anonymous
    @Anonymous


    Jack D probably covers a wider breadth of subject matter than any other single commenter on this blog.
     
    He is a greater content lifter than any other single commenter on this blog. Not only does he copy from wikipedia but from various publications without attribution. For example, when the US began supplying the Javelin to Ukraine, the Financial Times published an article explaining how it works. Jack D spent a lot of effort rewriting that article and posting it here as his own comment. About that time, when an Su-25 was shot down and video of the pilot ejecting was posted on Twitter, Jack D scraped the comment thread and rewrote it as a comment he posted here.
    About then I began ignoring hist posts but I'm sure he has continued to do that as he has always done. He has even scraped and rewrote content I've published elsewhere about my own profession and presented it as his own. Why he would expend so much effort just to make comments on Sailer's blog I can't imagine.
    He must have extreme self-esteem issues, or perhaps have a gigantic ego that makes him so annoying in life that no one wants to associate with him, so he comes to this blog because his comments don't get blocked and he can strut and preen to his heart's desire.
    Enjoy his posts if you like, but keep in mind that when he writes -- or rewrites -- he often misunderstands or gets things wrong. So whether he is posting about pot-bellied stoves, Iraqi air defenses in the Iraq War, movie studios in Hollywood or learning foreign languages, he doesn't know what he is talking about and is just another time-wasting blowhard.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @New Dealer, @Mike Tre, @J.Ross, @Bernard

    That explains much. I scanned past him for a time. His comments on my few posts were not incorrect but were off or uninteresting. When he posted on how to choose the best non-stick frying pan, I marked him in my mind. Next, I noticed that he posted a lot of comments on a lot of topics, tending towards the tendentious or irrelevant. Now, I’ll resume scanning past.

  325. @Frau Katze
    @Reg Cæsar

    Hunting rifles are very common in Canada. Handguns, much less.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    Hunting rifles are very common in Canada. Handguns, much less.

    The difference is not in the guns. It’s in the hands.

  326. @Anonymous
    @Peter Akuleyev

    'India dominate Russia.'

    Utterly ridiculous that anyone can believe this. Russia will forever be the hard man from the cold north west who put the 'Kush' in 'Hindu Kush'.

    On the other hand, India dominating the UK, Australia and Canada is, more or less, a racing certainty.
    India dominating the USA is moot at this point.

    Replies: @Looger, @Jack D

    Russia will forever be the hard man from the cold north west who put the ‘Kush’ in ‘Hindu Kush’.

    You’ve been reading to much Putinist propaganda. Russia wins every war, except for the ones that end in humiliating defeat which they conveniently forget about. Russians thought that they were hard men from the cold north west when they went to Afghanistan. That didn’t work out. Russians thought that they were hard men from the cold north west when they took on the Japanese Navy in the Russo-Japanese War and that didn’t work out either.

    Mountains are really non-discriminatory – they will kill anyone and don’t have a special animus toward Hindus.

    • Thanks: Johann Ricke
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Jack D

    My point is that Hindus are a race of attenuated physical weaklings, so rendered by millennia of evolution in a life sapping torrid climate, mass overpopulation and perpetual starvation.
    Traditionally, Hindus have been dominated by invaders from central Asia emanating from the north west frontier. People harder, tougher, stronger and more ruthless. There has never been movement in the other direction, unless you count the Gypsies - and they were originally slaves taken over the mountains by invaders.
    In fact, in more forthright times, back in the 19th century, a criticism made of the British by some rather cruel people was that they were fostering the mass population growth of this vitiated race, which in the normal course of events would have been arrested by hard nosed, bigger stronger people from central Asia.

    Nevertheless, what Indians lack in brawn they make up with in guile and cunning, so as it is a given that the west will be run by Economist-whipped fools, expect a total managerial and political takeover of the west by Indians, followed by a hefty general population takeover.

    Replies: @J.Ross

  327. @res
    @Frau Katze

    An earlier usage (2019).
    https://www.unz.com/isteve/genuine-historians-denounce-nyts-1619-project/#comment-3622857

    Unsurprisingly, the Amazon reviews of the book are bimodal at one and five stars. Interesting to see the different "helpful" votes. I think the most helpful review wins that thread though with this title: "Loxism at its finest."

    https://www.amazon.com/White-Rural-Rage-American-Democracy/dp/0593729145

    P.S. Anyone want to bet on whether the review from "pinkvock" is sincere (accurately representing the reviewer) or not?

    Replies: @New Dealer, @MEH 0910, @Frau Katze

    I went to Amazon. No review by “pinkvock.” Comments are being ethnically cleansed:

    Amazon has noticed unusual reviewing activity on this product. Due to this activity, we have limited this product to verified purchase reviews.

    • Replies: @Frau Katze
    @New Dealer

    Re: “White Rural Rage” at Amazon

    There’s 10 reader reviews there now and half of them are 1-star. I’ve never seen that distribution before and I’ve looked at a lot of reader reviews there (albeit less controversial content).

    Replies: @res

    , @res
    @New Dealer

    I see it under all reviews now. See if this works.
    https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-reviews/R2DAN9BF7Z2CY5/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B0CKVJ66JR

    Here is the review text.


    As a lifelong rural resident and a former conservative they were able to accurately express the phenomenon I’ve seen occur here. I was falling prey to the right wing propagandists myself but over time I saw them moving away from ideas of freedom and democracy. I’ve seen where my fellow rural Americans have gone and it’s been astonishing to watch them wholeheartedly swallow everything. Very tribal in the thinking. Being a part of the community means accepting crazy conspiracies and thinking city ppl are coming to do something to you. It’s not very constructive. Thank you for writing this book, you got it right, I’m a witness.
     

    Replies: @Anonymous, @New Dealer

  328. @anonymous
    @Anonymous


    Jack D probably covers a wider breadth of subject matter than any other single commenter on this blog.
     
    He is a greater content lifter than any other single commenter on this blog. Not only does he copy from wikipedia but from various publications without attribution. For example, when the US began supplying the Javelin to Ukraine, the Financial Times published an article explaining how it works. Jack D spent a lot of effort rewriting that article and posting it here as his own comment. About that time, when an Su-25 was shot down and video of the pilot ejecting was posted on Twitter, Jack D scraped the comment thread and rewrote it as a comment he posted here.
    About then I began ignoring hist posts but I'm sure he has continued to do that as he has always done. He has even scraped and rewrote content I've published elsewhere about my own profession and presented it as his own. Why he would expend so much effort just to make comments on Sailer's blog I can't imagine.
    He must have extreme self-esteem issues, or perhaps have a gigantic ego that makes him so annoying in life that no one wants to associate with him, so he comes to this blog because his comments don't get blocked and he can strut and preen to his heart's desire.
    Enjoy his posts if you like, but keep in mind that when he writes -- or rewrites -- he often misunderstands or gets things wrong. So whether he is posting about pot-bellied stoves, Iraqi air defenses in the Iraq War, movie studios in Hollywood or learning foreign languages, he doesn't know what he is talking about and is just another time-wasting blowhard.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @New Dealer, @Mike Tre, @J.Ross, @Bernard

    There was a commenter that went by Paperback Writer who was very good at exposing Jack D’s scam a couple years back, but has himself stopped commenting for at least a year now.

    It’s been obvious for years and years that Jack D is a disingenuous fraud, but the “in crowd” here step on each other’s necks to be first to engage with him. It’s bizarre.

    • Replies: @SFG
    @Mike Tre

    You think people who post on largely-anonymous internet sites regarding taboo topics are more, or less argumentative than the average person?

    Replies: @Mike Tre

    , @res
    @Mike Tre

    https://www.unz.com/comments/all/?commenterfilter=Paperback+Writer

    Replies: @Anonymous

  329. @res
    @Frau Katze

    An earlier usage (2019).
    https://www.unz.com/isteve/genuine-historians-denounce-nyts-1619-project/#comment-3622857

    Unsurprisingly, the Amazon reviews of the book are bimodal at one and five stars. Interesting to see the different "helpful" votes. I think the most helpful review wins that thread though with this title: "Loxism at its finest."

    https://www.amazon.com/White-Rural-Rage-American-Democracy/dp/0593729145

    P.S. Anyone want to bet on whether the review from "pinkvock" is sincere (accurately representing the reviewer) or not?

    Replies: @New Dealer, @MEH 0910, @Frau Katze

    NYT:
    https://archive.ph/CkZmW

    The Mystery of White Rural Rage
    By Paul Krugman
    Feb. 26, 2024
    […]
    This process and its effects are laid out in devastating, terrifying and baffling detail in “White Rural Rage: The Threat to American Democracy,” a new book by Tom Schaller and Paul Waldman. I say “devastating” because the hardship of rural Americans is real, “terrifying” because the political backlash to this hardship poses a clear and present danger to our democracy and “baffling” because at some level I still don’t get the politics.

    • Thanks: res
    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @MEH 0910

    Question: during the lockdown was Stancil one of those "Then I hope you die" stasi assholes anywhere on social media?

  330. @res
    @Frau Katze

    An earlier usage (2019).
    https://www.unz.com/isteve/genuine-historians-denounce-nyts-1619-project/#comment-3622857

    Unsurprisingly, the Amazon reviews of the book are bimodal at one and five stars. Interesting to see the different "helpful" votes. I think the most helpful review wins that thread though with this title: "Loxism at its finest."

    https://www.amazon.com/White-Rural-Rage-American-Democracy/dp/0593729145

    P.S. Anyone want to bet on whether the review from "pinkvock" is sincere (accurately representing the reviewer) or not?

    Replies: @New Dealer, @MEH 0910, @Frau Katze

    I don’t like the description on Amazon of “White Rural Rage”

    In White Rural Rage, Tom Schaller and Paul Waldman explore why rural Whites have failed to reap the benefits from their outsize political power and why, as a result, they are the most likely group to abandon democratic norms and traditions. Their rage—stoked daily by Republican politicians and the conservative media—now poses an existential threat to the United States.

    Schaller and Waldman show how vulnerable U.S. democracy has become to rural Whites who, despite legitimate grievances, are increasingly inclined to hold racist and xenophobic beliefs, to believe in conspiracy theories, to accept violence as a legitimate course of political action, and to exhibit antidemocratic tendencies.

    They’re racist because they don’t like getting passed over for promotion because they’re white men. And I guess if they don’t like a totally open border they’re xenophobic.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    @Frau Katze


    'Schaller and Waldman show how vulnerable U.S. democracy has become to rural Whites who, despite legitimate grievances, are increasingly inclined to hold racist and xenophobic beliefs, to believe in conspiracy theories, to accept violence as a legitimate course of political action, and to exhibit antidemocratic tendencies.'

    They’re racist because they don’t like getting passed over for promotion because they’re white men. And I guess if they don’t like a totally open border they’re xenophobic.
     
    The unpleasant part of this is by 'U.S. democracy' they don't mean democracy at all. They mean continued domination and manipulation of the political process by a coterie of elites and their puppets.

    'Democracy' is what scares them, not what they're trying to preserve. Actual rule by the actual people? The blood runs cold.
    , @deep anonymous
    @Frau Katze


    "In White Rural Rage, Tom Schaller and Paul Waldman explore why rural Whites have failed to reap the benefits from their outsize political power . . ."
     
    (quoted from the review)

    In what universe do rural Whites have ANY political power, let alone "outsize[d]" power? This is just more gaslighting 101 (aka bullsh-t) from our (((verbalist overclass))).

    Just a few years ago, Angus Deaton and his wife, whose name I don't recall (don't mean to denigrate her, she was a co-author) explained the impact of the opioid epidemic on White rural communities. "Deaths of despair" is what they called them. Despair caused by loss of any meaningful employment opportunities, loss of communities, loss of self---in a word, total, absolute loss of political, social, and economic power.

    Replies: @Jack D

  331. @Jack D
    @Colin Wright


    First, you obviously are referring to the participation (often with the alternative of death by starvation in a POW camp) of some Ukrainians in the Holocaust.
     
    Do the marchers in this photo look like they are starving and being forced to march in this parade?

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b0/%D0%9F%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B4_%D0%B2_%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B5_%28%D0%98%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE-%D0%A4%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA%29_%D0%B2_%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C_%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B0_%D0%B3%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BB-%D0%B3%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B0_%D0%9F%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%88%D0%B8_%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B9%D1%85%D1%81%D0%BB%D1%8F%D0%B9%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0_%D0%93%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%B0_%D0%A4%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_2.jpeg

    They look pretty well fed to me. And they were marking specifically under the banner of Ukrainian nationalism.

    My father was in a situation where he really was starving and in a camp and he could have collaborated with the Germans as a kapo and he didn't. He would have rather died. When he was on his deathbed one of the last things he said to me (in Yiddish) was " I want you to know that I did not do wrong to anyone." He meant specifically this.

    The "Jewish" commissars were no longer Jewish at all. They were converts to the new religion of Communism. The did not act as Jews but as Communists. They denounced Judaism along with all other religions as the opiate of the masses and they closed synagogues and imprisoned rabbis. I feel no more responsible for their actions as a Jew than I would if they had take vows as Catholic priests and participated in the Inquisition (that happened too).

    Replies: @Colin Wright, @Colin Wright

    I think you’re evading the issue. You cheerfully join in a sense of collective grievance if Jews are victimized or you imagine them to have been victimized. If Jews sin, you feel no guilt. They were no longer part of the collective.

    We could go through it all — but we both know the outcome. In every case, either the Jews weren’t acting as Jews, or they at least meant well, or it didn’t happen.

    How can you expect anyone to respect you? It’s all the most shameless mendacity. It’s not even flattering to other Jews. I’m fully aware you’re not an especially fair example. Others may not be.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Colin Wright

    This is not true. You can be a Jew and do despicable things and remain a Jew and I will despise you. Kapos come to mind. The only mendacity here is yours when you try to tar all Jews with the sins of the Stalinist apostates - a classic antisemitic lie straight out of the Nazi playbook.
    ,

    Replies: @Colin Wright

  332. @Anon7
    @Gruesome Newsom

    I don't know if it will be the "New Thing" but the current thing is leftist state governors trying to convince people to take migrants into their homes.

    So, combining the trend of millennial children moving back into their parent's McMansions, there are still empty rooms. So, fill them with migrants, who can help take care of the aging parents, and since these migrants will collect our tax dollars, they can also contribute some money.

    New business model.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @David Davenport, @Colin Wright

    …New business model.

    No it’s not. It’s ultimately the idea that you can spend more than you make.

    Just keep borrowing more money. In your case, you would just keep importing more people.

  333. @New Dealer
    @res

    I went to Amazon. No review by "pinkvock." Comments are being ethnically cleansed:


    Amazon has noticed unusual reviewing activity on this product. Due to this activity, we have limited this product to verified purchase reviews.
     

    Replies: @Frau Katze, @res

    Re: “White Rural Rage” at Amazon

    There’s 10 reader reviews there now and half of them are 1-star. I’ve never seen that distribution before and I’ve looked at a lot of reader reviews there (albeit less controversial content).

    • Replies: @res
    @Frau Katze

    That is extreme, but something of the sort is not that rare for something both controversial and obscure. For more popular things the combination of the woke masses and comment censorship tends to limit it.

    Right now there are 12 ratings (10 reviews) and the distribution is a near-perfect anti-Bell curve. 39/11/0/11/39%

    Note that the 5 negative reviews are being underweighted in the average.

    Replies: @Frau Katze

  334. @Frau Katze
    @res

    I don’t like the description on Amazon of “White Rural Rage”


    In White Rural Rage, Tom Schaller and Paul Waldman explore why rural Whites have failed to reap the benefits from their outsize political power and why, as a result, they are the most likely group to abandon democratic norms and traditions. Their rage—stoked daily by Republican politicians and the conservative media—now poses an existential threat to the United States.

    Schaller and Waldman show how vulnerable U.S. democracy has become to rural Whites who, despite legitimate grievances, are increasingly inclined to hold racist and xenophobic beliefs, to believe in conspiracy theories, to accept violence as a legitimate course of political action, and to exhibit antidemocratic tendencies.
     
    They’re racist because they don’t like getting passed over for promotion because they’re white men. And I guess if they don’t like a totally open border they’re xenophobic.

    Replies: @Colin Wright, @deep anonymous

    ‘Schaller and Waldman show how vulnerable U.S. democracy has become to rural Whites who, despite legitimate grievances, are increasingly inclined to hold racist and xenophobic beliefs, to believe in conspiracy theories, to accept violence as a legitimate course of political action, and to exhibit antidemocratic tendencies.’

    They’re racist because they don’t like getting passed over for promotion because they’re white men. And I guess if they don’t like a totally open border they’re xenophobic.

    The unpleasant part of this is by ‘U.S. democracy’ they don’t mean democracy at all. They mean continued domination and manipulation of the political process by a coterie of elites and their puppets.

    ‘Democracy’ is what scares them, not what they’re trying to preserve. Actual rule by the actual people? The blood runs cold.

    • Agree: Ben tillman
  335. res says:
    @New Dealer
    @res

    I went to Amazon. No review by "pinkvock." Comments are being ethnically cleansed:


    Amazon has noticed unusual reviewing activity on this product. Due to this activity, we have limited this product to verified purchase reviews.
     

    Replies: @Frau Katze, @res

    I see it under all reviews now. See if this works.
    https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-reviews/R2DAN9BF7Z2CY5/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B0CKVJ66JR

    Here is the review text.

    As a lifelong rural resident and a former conservative they were able to accurately express the phenomenon I’ve seen occur here. I was falling prey to the right wing propagandists myself but over time I saw them moving away from ideas of freedom and democracy. I’ve seen where my fellow rural Americans have gone and it’s been astonishing to watch them wholeheartedly swallow everything. Very tribal in the thinking. Being a part of the community means accepting crazy conspiracies and thinking city ppl are coming to do something to you. It’s not very constructive. Thank you for writing this book, you got it right, I’m a witness.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @res

    I can believe it is sincere. My wife's family are the most bonafide rural Americans I've ever met and have expressed similar thoughts (though without the full pendulum swing to embracing the other side: they are too decent and sensible for that.) The American right-wing really has become very emotional/conspiratorial in their thinking (OBVIOUSLY so has the left), and the culture of rural America really has declined.

    Of course, it's also exactly the sort of thing that the presumable target audience of above-average-but-not-too-high-IQ, validation-craving, wannabe snobs would find relatable, so it could also easily be a planted review. Who would know?

    , @New Dealer
    @res

    Yup, my mistake maybe.

  336. @Mike Tre
    @anonymous

    There was a commenter that went by Paperback Writer who was very good at exposing Jack D's scam a couple years back, but has himself stopped commenting for at least a year now.

    It's been obvious for years and years that Jack D is a disingenuous fraud, but the "in crowd" here step on each other's necks to be first to engage with him. It's bizarre.

    Replies: @SFG, @res

    You think people who post on largely-anonymous internet sites regarding taboo topics are more, or less argumentative than the average person?

    • Replies: @Mike Tre
    @SFG

    Are you really justifying Jack D's shtick? There are plenty of honest, argumentative people.

  337. @Mike Tre
    @anonymous

    There was a commenter that went by Paperback Writer who was very good at exposing Jack D's scam a couple years back, but has himself stopped commenting for at least a year now.

    It's been obvious for years and years that Jack D is a disingenuous fraud, but the "in crowd" here step on each other's necks to be first to engage with him. It's bizarre.

    Replies: @SFG, @res

    • Thanks: Mike Tre
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @res

    I appreciate when people engage honestly and logically with Jack D (and anyone else) when he is wrong, citing sources. You yourself have done this this and I am grateful. That said...
    A lot of commenters here simply must believe that they are smarter, wiser, and/or gooder than anyone who disagrees with them on anything. Thus when confronted by Jack D, they self-servingly and in my opinion obnoxiously magnify his flaws. He sometimes gets things wrong and garbles details in his voluminous output? Fraud! He writes things he read somewhere else? Cheater! He's ethnocentric and thinks highly of Jews? Wicked enemy of White civilization! These people really do themselves a disservice because Jack writes a lot of great comments--even the ones with logical lapses or factual inaccuracies are generally thought-provoking. (I guess a lot of people don't come here to think, they come to circlejerk, or whine about Steve not being Anglin or Zerohedge, but anyway...) And he's obviously not a parrot (or a committee LOL): he has a consistent personal voice in his writing regardless of however much of his knowledge stays in his head at once. (Which is a lot more than others are implying: if you want to pad your comments with relevant info from Wikipedia or wherever else, you have to know something already to even know what's worth looking up. Especially at Jack's pace.)

    Replies: @res, @William Badwhite, @Stripes Duncan

  338. res says:
    @Frau Katze
    @New Dealer

    Re: “White Rural Rage” at Amazon

    There’s 10 reader reviews there now and half of them are 1-star. I’ve never seen that distribution before and I’ve looked at a lot of reader reviews there (albeit less controversial content).

    Replies: @res

    That is extreme, but something of the sort is not that rare for something both controversial and obscure. For more popular things the combination of the woke masses and comment censorship tends to limit it.

    Right now there are 12 ratings (10 reviews) and the distribution is a near-perfect anti-Bell curve. 39/11/0/11/39%

    Note that the 5 negative reviews are being underweighted in the average.

    • Replies: @Frau Katze
    @res

    Re: White Rural Rage

    Sounds like it would make a good book review for Steve. It would likely generate lots of comments.

  339. @Anonymous
    @J.Ross

    Lol, who is Dr Zaius in this analogy?

    Replies: @J.Ross

  340. @MEH 0910
    @res

    NYT:
    https://archive.ph/CkZmW


    The Mystery of White Rural Rage
    By Paul Krugman
    Feb. 26, 2024
    [...]
    This process and its effects are laid out in devastating, terrifying and baffling detail in “White Rural Rage: The Threat to American Democracy,” a new book by Tom Schaller and Paul Waldman. I say “devastating” because the hardship of rural Americans is real, “terrifying” because the political backlash to this hardship poses a clear and present danger to our democracy and “baffling” because at some level I still don’t get the politics.
     
    https://twitter.com/whstancil/status/1762327623143686315

    Replies: @J.Ross

    Question: during the lockdown was Stancil one of those “Then I hope you die” stasi assholes anywhere on social media?

  341. @anonymous
    @Anonymous


    Jack D probably covers a wider breadth of subject matter than any other single commenter on this blog.
     
    He is a greater content lifter than any other single commenter on this blog. Not only does he copy from wikipedia but from various publications without attribution. For example, when the US began supplying the Javelin to Ukraine, the Financial Times published an article explaining how it works. Jack D spent a lot of effort rewriting that article and posting it here as his own comment. About that time, when an Su-25 was shot down and video of the pilot ejecting was posted on Twitter, Jack D scraped the comment thread and rewrote it as a comment he posted here.
    About then I began ignoring hist posts but I'm sure he has continued to do that as he has always done. He has even scraped and rewrote content I've published elsewhere about my own profession and presented it as his own. Why he would expend so much effort just to make comments on Sailer's blog I can't imagine.
    He must have extreme self-esteem issues, or perhaps have a gigantic ego that makes him so annoying in life that no one wants to associate with him, so he comes to this blog because his comments don't get blocked and he can strut and preen to his heart's desire.
    Enjoy his posts if you like, but keep in mind that when he writes -- or rewrites -- he often misunderstands or gets things wrong. So whether he is posting about pot-bellied stoves, Iraqi air defenses in the Iraq War, movie studios in Hollywood or learning foreign languages, he doesn't know what he is talking about and is just another time-wasting blowhard.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @New Dealer, @Mike Tre, @J.Ross, @Bernard

    I plant lie in ground, watch grow into truth

  342. @YetAnotherAnon
    @SFG

    "there were plenty of pogroms in Czarist Russia"

    Interestingly, Morgan Jones argues at this site that the pogrom narrative was greatly embellished.

    https://www.unz.com/article/great-variance/


    Reports of Russian persecution of Jews by Joseph Jacobs in The Times were credited as sparking the pogrom controversy in January 1882. They prompted meetings at Mansion House and the Guildhall, at which at least £200,000 was donated; these donations were collected into the Mansion House Fund, which the Board of Guardians and other organisations drew upon to help Jews settle in London or travel on to the USA. A Mansion House Committee was formed and was soon renamed the Russo-Jewish Committee, with Julian Goldsmid as chairman and Jacobs as secretary. Fellow journalist and Jewish activist Lucien Wolf amplified Jacobs’ efforts in the press and worked to co-ordinate the efforts of the AJA and the Board of Deputies of British Jews. Bishops, cardinals, authors and celebrities of the day were won to the cause by the atrocity reports.[4]

    Benjamin Disraeli as Prime Minister had narrowly been prevented from starting a war against Russia in 1877-8, and anti-Russian propaganda was already commonplace in parts of the British press.[5]

    According to John Klier the Times “habitually described it as ‘a backward country, which has not yet worked its way to the level of European life’. The paper had begun a low-level campaign against Russian mistreatment of the Jews even before the outbreak of the pogroms.”[6] The Times was at pains to condemn the Russian government at least as early as 1880. The Telegraph, owned by Harry Levy-Lawson, began to promote the same line with even greater fervour. The Jewish World then, between July and October 1881, published reports from an unnamed Special Correspondent which “portrayed the pogroms dramatically, as great in scale and inhuman in their brutality”, including rape and murder of Jews on a large scale across many locations. According to Klier, “[M]any of his claims, such as the enormous number of rapes, are unconfirmed or flatly contradicted by the archival record… His account most resembles a compilation of hearsay evidence, very little of it collected from first-hand observers. His atrocity reports, in particular, must be viewed with extreme caution.”[7]
     
    As a young student I met a Jew from Kiev (who'd left the USSR as was) who said you could be attacked in the street there for being Jewish - but then as a child I was attacked in the street in Wales (by other children) for having an English accent. I've not held it against the entire Welsh nation.

    Replies: @Jack D, @Ben tillman

    Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.

  343. @Colin Wright
    @Jack D

    I think you're evading the issue. You cheerfully join in a sense of collective grievance if Jews are victimized or you imagine them to have been victimized. If Jews sin, you feel no guilt. They were no longer part of the collective.

    We could go through it all -- but we both know the outcome. In every case, either the Jews weren't acting as Jews, or they at least meant well, or it didn't happen.

    How can you expect anyone to respect you? It's all the most shameless mendacity. It's not even flattering to other Jews. I'm fully aware you're not an especially fair example. Others may not be.

    Replies: @Jack D

    This is not true. You can be a Jew and do despicable things and remain a Jew and I will despise you. Kapos come to mind. The only mendacity here is yours when you try to tar all Jews with the sins of the Stalinist apostates – a classic antisemitic lie straight out of the Nazi playbook.
    ,

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    @Jack D


    'This is not true. You can be a Jew and do despicable things and remain a Jew and I will despise you. Kapos come to mind. The only mendacity here is yours when you try to tar all Jews with the sins of the Stalinist apostates – a classic antisemitic lie straight out of the Nazi playbook'
     
    Significantly, Kapos would be Jews who do bad things to other Jews. Let's hear you condemn Bolshevik Jews, or the Jews of Israel, or for that matter, the Jews of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society.

    ...but you're still evading the issue. My original point is that it's a one-way street with you; if Jews are victims, or collectively have some positive aspect, you're part of the community. If it's the reverse, nothing to do with you. I'm me and they're them.

    Replies: @Wielgus, @Jack D

  344. anonymous[361] • Disclaimer says:

    Current New Thing:

    America regularly losing due to DEI hires and the resulting erosion of our collective IQ required to manage complex tasks.

    Conclusion: Diversity for its own sake is societal poison for generations.

    https://nypost.com/2024/03/01/us-news/first-us-moon-lander-in-half-a-century-stops-working-a-week-after-tipping-over-at-touchdown/

    • Replies: @Joe Stalin
    @anonymous

    The US moon lander did pretty good considering that one of the primary landing instruments failed and they resorted to an on-board instrument not ment to be used for landing.

    They landed the thing intact.

    It's hard to get to the moon intact with everything working, as JPL can attest to.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UupndWl0G_I

  345. Anonymous[230] • Disclaimer says:
    @res
    @New Dealer

    I see it under all reviews now. See if this works.
    https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-reviews/R2DAN9BF7Z2CY5/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B0CKVJ66JR

    Here is the review text.


    As a lifelong rural resident and a former conservative they were able to accurately express the phenomenon I’ve seen occur here. I was falling prey to the right wing propagandists myself but over time I saw them moving away from ideas of freedom and democracy. I’ve seen where my fellow rural Americans have gone and it’s been astonishing to watch them wholeheartedly swallow everything. Very tribal in the thinking. Being a part of the community means accepting crazy conspiracies and thinking city ppl are coming to do something to you. It’s not very constructive. Thank you for writing this book, you got it right, I’m a witness.
     

    Replies: @Anonymous, @New Dealer

    I can believe it is sincere. My wife’s family are the most bonafide rural Americans I’ve ever met and have expressed similar thoughts (though without the full pendulum swing to embracing the other side: they are too decent and sensible for that.) The American right-wing really has become very emotional/conspiratorial in their thinking (OBVIOUSLY so has the left), and the culture of rural America really has declined.

    Of course, it’s also exactly the sort of thing that the presumable target audience of above-average-but-not-too-high-IQ, validation-craving, wannabe snobs would find relatable, so it could also easily be a planted review. Who would know?

  346. Anonymous[256] • Disclaimer says:
    @res
    @Mike Tre

    https://www.unz.com/comments/all/?commenterfilter=Paperback+Writer

    Replies: @Anonymous

    I appreciate when people engage honestly and logically with Jack D (and anyone else) when he is wrong, citing sources. You yourself have done this this and I am grateful. That said…

    [MORE]
    A lot of commenters here simply must believe that they are smarter, wiser, and/or gooder than anyone who disagrees with them on anything. Thus when confronted by Jack D, they self-servingly and in my opinion obnoxiously magnify his flaws. He sometimes gets things wrong and garbles details in his voluminous output? Fraud! He writes things he read somewhere else? Cheater! He’s ethnocentric and thinks highly of Jews? Wicked enemy of White civilization! These people really do themselves a disservice because Jack writes a lot of great comments–even the ones with logical lapses or factual inaccuracies are generally thought-provoking. (I guess a lot of people don’t come here to think, they come to circlejerk, or whine about Steve not being Anglin or Zerohedge, but anyway…) And he’s obviously not a parrot (or a committee LOL): he has a consistent personal voice in his writing regardless of however much of his knowledge stays in his head at once. (Which is a lot more than others are implying: if you want to pad your comments with relevant info from Wikipedia or wherever else, you have to know something already to even know what’s worth looking up. Especially at Jack’s pace.)

    • LOL: Mike Tre
    • Replies: @res
    @Anonymous

    A lot to that. I strongly agree with this in particular.


    he has a consistent personal voice in his writing regardless of however much of his knowledge stays in his head at once. (Which is a lot more than others are implying: if you want to pad your comments with relevant info from Wikipedia or wherever else, you have to know something already to even know what’s worth looking up. Especially at Jack’s pace.)
     
    I tend to do something like that frequently. I find giving sources (and Wikipedia tends to be a decent start as long as you take care around controversial topics) helpful to save time, provide a summary better than I could do without significant effort, avoid simple mistakes (e.g. refresh my own knowledge first when it is partial), and provide further references.

    One big fault line here is how much different people value statistics and analysis vs. lived experience and deeply held opinions.

    Replies: @David Davenport

    , @William Badwhite
    @Anonymous

    Thanks Jack!

    obnoxiously magnify his flaws. He sometimes gets things wrong and garbles details in his voluminous output? Fraud! He writes things he read somewhere else? Cheater! He’s ethnocentric and thinks highly of Jews? Wicked enemy of White civilization!
     

    People object to Jack because of his pervasive dishonesty. And to the "voluminous output" which you reference. But mainly to the dishonesty. And the ethnocentrism for me but not for thee. But mainly the dishonesty.

    Replies: @Colin Wright

    , @Stripes Duncan
    @Anonymous


    A lot of commenters here simply must believe that they are smarter, wiser, and/or gooder than anyone who disagrees with them on anything.
     
    This has been my experience with the entirety of the online dissident right for as long as I've dabbled in it. In my opinion it's our biggest flaw.
  347. Anonymous[203] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jack D
    @Anonymous


    Russia will forever be the hard man from the cold north west who put the ‘Kush’ in ‘Hindu Kush’.
     
    You've been reading to much Putinist propaganda. Russia wins every war, except for the ones that end in humiliating defeat which they conveniently forget about. Russians thought that they were hard men from the cold north west when they went to Afghanistan. That didn't work out. Russians thought that they were hard men from the cold north west when they took on the Japanese Navy in the Russo-Japanese War and that didn't work out either.

    Mountains are really non-discriminatory - they will kill anyone and don't have a special animus toward Hindus.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    My point is that Hindus are a race of attenuated physical weaklings, so rendered by millennia of evolution in a life sapping torrid climate, mass overpopulation and perpetual starvation.
    Traditionally, Hindus have been dominated by invaders from central Asia emanating from the north west frontier. People harder, tougher, stronger and more ruthless. There has never been movement in the other direction, unless you count the Gypsies – and they were originally slaves taken over the mountains by invaders.
    In fact, in more forthright times, back in the 19th century, a criticism made of the British by some rather cruel people was that they were fostering the mass population growth of this vitiated race, which in the normal course of events would have been arrested by hard nosed, bigger stronger people from central Asia.

    Nevertheless, what Indians lack in brawn they make up with in guile and cunning, so as it is a given that the west will be run by Economist-whipped fools, expect a total managerial and political takeover of the west by Indians, followed by a hefty general population takeover.

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @Anonymous

    There was just a thread on 4chan commenting on how truly bizarre and nonhuman my Congressional representative, Shri Thanedar, looks. They posted his official picture, and you look at the thing and think, that's got to be wrong.

  348. @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @AnotherDad

    Wrong, wrong, wrong, extra sausage points for being... well, wrong.

    Speaking as the "I lived with 23 topless lesbians in a commune and survived to tell about it" expert, I can tell you that topless lesbians swaggering around pretending to be sailors are really quite fetching, even when they don't mean to do that. At least the college-age ones. You can ask my then-gf, who used to get beet-red with envy.

    As for this horse-swaggle...


    "Women, strip away sex–the “who will she make babies with”–are rather boring. They … talk."

    Most of the lesbians I know -- and I still kn0w quite a few -- transfer their maternal instincts into societal issues like homelessness. Some of them get it wrong, crusading for nonsense issues, but hey... a lot of 'em make a heck of a lot better difference in life than random internet bozos.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjrvXvGM-PI


    Well she sings a song
    So sad and high,
    And the Tulsa Queen
    Don't ever lie.


    -- La Godess Emmyou Harris, Queen of Reality

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease

    In an old haunt in Cambridge,
    Well-dusted with mops,
    Lived 23 lesbians
    Who didn’t wear tops.

    At four kooky tables
    They broke their bread,
    Supped vegan vichysoisse,
    And went to bed.

    They knew in their hearts
    One plus one is three.
    The weirdest one
    Was GToD.

    (apologies to the creator of the sublime mural in Bemelmans Bar at the Carlyle.)

  349. anon[209] • Disclaimer says:

    “What’s next? Many on the right argued that it had to be pedophilia, mostly because that grossed them out the most. But all the trends point in the opposite direction: For example, the woke are increasingly disgusted by the thought of a 35-year-old man marrying a 25-year-old woman (presumably, a trend driven by all the single 35-year-old women fearing being permanently left on the shelf by single 35-year-old men).”

    Steve you don’t get it, or you do and I have to wonder if you’re deliberately misconstruing the culture trendlines because you want your loxbrow goobercon base to stay emotionally inert against the utter degradation of society occurring all around them.

    25-year-old women aren’t even close to children. Have you stepped out of the closet lately? The “woke” disgust for older man-younger woman pairings is a completely separate triggering event than the normie disgust for homosexual and parasexual-adjacent sexualization of children. The “woke”….ie jews, shabbos lackey libwhites, and Wall impact designees….are shifting into pedo-lite acceptance and away from tolerance of older man-younger woman couples, and the reasoning and psychological motivation are EXACTLY THE SAME.

    They hate traditional and socially benevolent White male patriarchy, and want to see normal White man and White woman desires pathologized while abhorrent, heinous sexual deviancies are elevated to the sacred.

    The pedo-acceptance or pedo-destigmatization agenda is happening in school libraries where elementary school kids are being exposed to perverted books indoctrinating them in the love is love lifestyle of trannies and homos. It is happening on shows like Toddlers and Tiaras. It is happening at school board meetings where Merrick Garfinkel’s thugs have shown up to intimidate concerned parents who aren’t down with the child grooming crossdresser she-male reading lists. It is evident in the ruling trash’s aesthetic preferences, notably exposed by WikiLeaks when we all got to see the Podesta Bros.’ homes decked out in sadopedophilic artwork (another one of those major behind the curtain peaks which mysteriously you had nothing to say about). It is evident at gay pride parades where small children are routinely mocked up in campy queer fashion and subjected to Loveislovecraftian horrors. It is evident in the APA’s since retracted softening of the definition of pedophilia to a “sexual orientation”. It is evident in the media’s ludicrous refusal to report on Biden’s strange and routine compulsion to sniff and touch kids inappropriately, and its refusal to even mention the part in Ashley Biden’s diary where she describes how uncomfortable she felt when daddy biden jumped into the shower with her. (Regime media elites may think the rubes are grossed out by child sexploitation, which the elites themselves don’t think is a big deal, so they sit on those stories, patently unbothered by it all.)

    And most conspicuously and invidiously, it is evident in the full court press to normalize the idea of child “gender identity” and to legalize and fund sex change operations and hormone poisoning for minors.

    Point of reference: Gay marriage was inconceivable for all of human history, until it wasn’t. The creepazoids and social fabric frayers kept pushing their wicked agenda, and here we are, riding the same slippery slope to the decriminalization of “minor attracted persons”.

    The danger, of course, is that what the elites want, the elites usually get, and often against the wishes of the plebian masses. And what the elites and their degenerate urbanoid apparatchiks want is a transformative view of sexuality that expands the zone of liberation to adult-child sexual exploration.

    Why can’t you see this obvious truth? What are you afraid of Noticing?

    This degeneracy spiral you are so dead set on ignoring or downplaying or remixing into a comforting Boomer tier scope of engagement is the acid that corrodes normalcy.

    Degeneracy opens avenues to pathologize normalcy.

    The sexualization and homosexualization of children, and the justified and rational public reactions against it, have emboldened a lot of unscrupulous feminists and Wall Impacters to muddy the deviancy waters by lumping visibly post-pubescent, fertile young women into the child category, with the express purpose of vilifying and stigmatizing the normal and natural male desire for younger women in the full bloom of peak fertility.

    The agenda is clear: to pollute and distort the normal functioning of the sexual market with groundless accusations of pedophilia until men are dissuaded from pursuing younger women and, so goes the hope of the spinster brigade, are forced by social pressure and desperation to switch to courting older women on the tail end of their tail years.

    This is how pedophilia destigmatization and straight male sexuality stigmatization work hand in tiny hand, as a combined front waged by spiteful mutants, shambling freakshows, and ethnosubversives against all that is Good, True, and Beautiful in White societies.

  350. @Anon 2
    @Locutor

    I meant numerically - U.S. Catholics are holding their own at 20-23%.
    I agree that Vatican II was a disaster in so many ways. But Catholicism
    still attracts many converts. For example, Jordan Peterson’s wife
    converted to Catholicism last year, so maybe he will be next.

    Replies: @Locutor

    I meant numerically – U.S. Catholics are holding their own at 20-23%.

    The Catholics in America keep their numbers artificially high by encouraging – it looks charitable – and counting Mexican immigrants even if they hardly if ever show up at church let alone give money.

    But Catholicism still attracts many converts. For example, Jordan Peterson’s wife converted to Catholicism last year, so maybe he will be next.

    For every Mrs. Peterson convert they get something like five people leave.

    P.S. President Biden is Catholic. Big deal.

  351. @Jack D
    @YetAnotherAnon


    Isn’t that just the bog-standard “move where the money is?”.
     
    No. It's just like the desperate people today who risk their life on leaky boats to cross the Mediterranean. People are not doing this to get a slightly better paying job but because their lives are hopeless and they feel as if they have nothing to lose.

    Maybe you move from Birmingham to Swansea because it's a booming area and then move to London when the area declines but you don't sell everything you own and get on a boat with only a suitcase and go to a country where you don't know anyone and can't speak the language unless things are pretty bad (most of the time).

    This was not true 100% of the time but it was most often true. In one branch of my wife's family, they actually came with money and they combined their trip to leave the Pale with a tour of Egypt on the way but this was by far the exception - out of all the Jews that I know this is the only story that I have heard that was anything like that. Most people with money stayed and died later in the Holocaust.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @YetAnotherAnon

    Depends what’s in the suitcase of course.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bearer_bond

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haavara_Agreement

    How many left Germany under this arrangement? Wiki is schtum, though we have this:

    Jewish population (174,610 in 1931, rising to 384,078 in 1936)

  352. @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Anonymous

    "Jack D probably covers a wider breadth of subject matter than any other single commenter on this blog."

    In all likelihood, Jack D is actually a team of 16 Jewish grad students sitting on the internet all day long, doing their IDF military service as a psy-ops team in an underground bunker in Haifa.

    Replies: @deep anonymous

    “In all likelihood, Jack D is actually a team of 16 Jewish grad students sitting on the internet all day long, doing their IDF military service as a psy-ops team in an underground bunker in Haifa.”

    The reason I doubt that is because pretty much all his posts seem to exhibit the same writing style. OTOH, Unit 8200 probably has advanced AI capabilities, so who knows? But in any event, Jack D. is amazingly prolific. I wonder how he finds time to work.

  353. @Wielgus
    @Almost Missouri

    I guess normalising LGBT is not transgressive enough. It's "long pig" time...

    Replies: @deep anonymous

    “I guess normalising LGBT is not transgressive enough.”

    I don’t remember where I read this (and so I can’t give proper attribution), but I suspect there is a ratcheting effect at work here. The Left is nothing if not relentless. Each time, the Left proposes some new, ridiculous cause, the Right (the Left’s shadow, as Dabney said) retreats and tries to bargain with them, and, after the latest victory in the Culture War, the Left has to come up with a new, even more ridiculous Cause of the Day/Most Important Issue Yet!

  354. @Anonymous
    @Jack D

    My point is that Hindus are a race of attenuated physical weaklings, so rendered by millennia of evolution in a life sapping torrid climate, mass overpopulation and perpetual starvation.
    Traditionally, Hindus have been dominated by invaders from central Asia emanating from the north west frontier. People harder, tougher, stronger and more ruthless. There has never been movement in the other direction, unless you count the Gypsies - and they were originally slaves taken over the mountains by invaders.
    In fact, in more forthright times, back in the 19th century, a criticism made of the British by some rather cruel people was that they were fostering the mass population growth of this vitiated race, which in the normal course of events would have been arrested by hard nosed, bigger stronger people from central Asia.

    Nevertheless, what Indians lack in brawn they make up with in guile and cunning, so as it is a given that the west will be run by Economist-whipped fools, expect a total managerial and political takeover of the west by Indians, followed by a hefty general population takeover.

    Replies: @J.Ross

    There was just a thread on 4chan commenting on how truly bizarre and nonhuman my Congressional representative, Shri Thanedar, looks. They posted his official picture, and you look at the thing and think, that’s got to be wrong.

  355. SFG says:
    @Anonymous
    @puttheforkdown


    An unrepentant materialist atheist
     
    Atheism is just the correct intellectual position. People don't rise from the dead.

    Just recently he gave out one of his grants worth tens of thousands of dollars to a trans person arguing for giving children more rights so that they can pursue underage transitioning regardless of the parents wishes.
     
    I wish he didn't do that. The fact that you know about it shows you read him or at least keep track of news in the community, so you must find *something* interesting there. The fundamental fact is that people like him run the country, not clowns like Majorie Taylor Greene. He suffered a lot of social and professional sanction for condemning feminism, calling him names because he won't go full skinhead is unwise. Even Nick Fuentes gets it now:

    https://twitter.com/ReactiveMay/status/1761222605057528223

    Replies: @SFG

    The thing about SA is he’s an off-ramp for liberalism. Lots of people who will never read Sailer or watch Tucker but are uncomfortable with wokery will read a Berkeley psychiatrist’s blog, and start drifting right. Everyone likes to quote Schmitt on the friend-enemy distinction but outside of a war politics is more about making unaffiliated people drift into your camp; do you think most Trump voters were dissident-right?

    Also a lot of Silicon Valley people read the blog, I have the impression.

  356. res says:
    @Anonymous
    @res

    I appreciate when people engage honestly and logically with Jack D (and anyone else) when he is wrong, citing sources. You yourself have done this this and I am grateful. That said...
    A lot of commenters here simply must believe that they are smarter, wiser, and/or gooder than anyone who disagrees with them on anything. Thus when confronted by Jack D, they self-servingly and in my opinion obnoxiously magnify his flaws. He sometimes gets things wrong and garbles details in his voluminous output? Fraud! He writes things he read somewhere else? Cheater! He's ethnocentric and thinks highly of Jews? Wicked enemy of White civilization! These people really do themselves a disservice because Jack writes a lot of great comments--even the ones with logical lapses or factual inaccuracies are generally thought-provoking. (I guess a lot of people don't come here to think, they come to circlejerk, or whine about Steve not being Anglin or Zerohedge, but anyway...) And he's obviously not a parrot (or a committee LOL): he has a consistent personal voice in his writing regardless of however much of his knowledge stays in his head at once. (Which is a lot more than others are implying: if you want to pad your comments with relevant info from Wikipedia or wherever else, you have to know something already to even know what's worth looking up. Especially at Jack's pace.)

    Replies: @res, @William Badwhite, @Stripes Duncan

    A lot to that. I strongly agree with this in particular.

    he has a consistent personal voice in his writing regardless of however much of his knowledge stays in his head at once. (Which is a lot more than others are implying: if you want to pad your comments with relevant info from Wikipedia or wherever else, you have to know something already to even know what’s worth looking up. Especially at Jack’s pace.)

    I tend to do something like that frequently. I find giving sources (and Wikipedia tends to be a decent start as long as you take care around controversial topics) helpful to save time, provide a summary better than I could do without significant effort, avoid simple mistakes (e.g. refresh my own knowledge first when it is partial), and provide further references.

    One big fault line here is how much different people value statistics and analysis vs. lived experience and deeply held opinions.

    • Replies: @David Davenport
    @res

    One big fault line here is how much different people value statistics and analysis vs. lived experience and deeply held opinions.

    "Lived experience"-- Everybody who's lived a while has some of that. So what? Some are right, and some are wrong.

    "Deeply held opinions" -- are still just opinions.

  357. @Jack D
    @Colin Wright

    This is not true. You can be a Jew and do despicable things and remain a Jew and I will despise you. Kapos come to mind. The only mendacity here is yours when you try to tar all Jews with the sins of the Stalinist apostates - a classic antisemitic lie straight out of the Nazi playbook.
    ,

    Replies: @Colin Wright

    ‘This is not true. You can be a Jew and do despicable things and remain a Jew and I will despise you. Kapos come to mind. The only mendacity here is yours when you try to tar all Jews with the sins of the Stalinist apostates – a classic antisemitic lie straight out of the Nazi playbook’

    Significantly, Kapos would be Jews who do bad things to other Jews. Let’s hear you condemn Bolshevik Jews, or the Jews of Israel, or for that matter, the Jews of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society.

    …but you’re still evading the issue. My original point is that it’s a one-way street with you; if Jews are victims, or collectively have some positive aspect, you’re part of the community. If it’s the reverse, nothing to do with you. I’m me and they’re them.

    • Thanks: deep anonymous
    • Replies: @Wielgus
    @Colin Wright

    A related issue is the tendency - not necessarily limited to Jews - to find some other identity for Jews who do bad things.
    The London slum landlord Peter Rachman is an example. In references to him he is often described as a "Pole" and he was born in pre-WW2 Poland, but though he became wealthy in Britain he never acquired British citizenship. The fact that he was a Jew - his last name possibly and ironically derived from Yiddish rachmones or "compassion" -is often slipped down the memory hole.

    , @Jack D
    @Colin Wright

    Thank God that the Men of Unz never do this. Whenever HIAS is condemned, they are always careful to also condemn Lutheran Charities and Catholic Charities. When a book that they don't like is authored by a Jew and a Christian they equally condemn "our Jewish verbalist overlords" and "our Christian verbalist overlords".

    Oh no, wait, they don't. The comments here are filled with blood libels against Jews that would make Goebbels blush and assign Jews 100% blame for everything that they think is wrong with our society. Did you know that Jews really DO use the blood of Christian children to make matzo? I would gladly accept that Jews (as a disproportionately elite high IQ minority) deserve 20 or 25% blame for some of our societal ills just like they deserve 20 or 25% credit for postwar American scientific accomplishments, but the Men of Unz blame them 100%.

    I don't think you need any extra condemnation of Jews from me - I think others are handling that POV more than adequately here, including you. But I guess having the Unz antisemitism meter at 10 is not good enough for you. You want it turned up to 11.

    Replies: @Colin Wright, @Colin Wright, @Colin Wright

  358. @Anonymous
    @res

    I appreciate when people engage honestly and logically with Jack D (and anyone else) when he is wrong, citing sources. You yourself have done this this and I am grateful. That said...
    A lot of commenters here simply must believe that they are smarter, wiser, and/or gooder than anyone who disagrees with them on anything. Thus when confronted by Jack D, they self-servingly and in my opinion obnoxiously magnify his flaws. He sometimes gets things wrong and garbles details in his voluminous output? Fraud! He writes things he read somewhere else? Cheater! He's ethnocentric and thinks highly of Jews? Wicked enemy of White civilization! These people really do themselves a disservice because Jack writes a lot of great comments--even the ones with logical lapses or factual inaccuracies are generally thought-provoking. (I guess a lot of people don't come here to think, they come to circlejerk, or whine about Steve not being Anglin or Zerohedge, but anyway...) And he's obviously not a parrot (or a committee LOL): he has a consistent personal voice in his writing regardless of however much of his knowledge stays in his head at once. (Which is a lot more than others are implying: if you want to pad your comments with relevant info from Wikipedia or wherever else, you have to know something already to even know what's worth looking up. Especially at Jack's pace.)

    Replies: @res, @William Badwhite, @Stripes Duncan

    Thanks Jack!

    obnoxiously magnify his flaws. He sometimes gets things wrong and garbles details in his voluminous output? Fraud! He writes things he read somewhere else? Cheater! He’s ethnocentric and thinks highly of Jews? Wicked enemy of White civilization!

    People object to Jack because of his pervasive dishonesty. And to the “voluminous output” which you reference. But mainly to the dishonesty. And the ethnocentrism for me but not for thee. But mainly the dishonesty.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    @William Badwhite


    '...People object to Jack because of his pervasive dishonesty...'
     
    The exasperating thing is that he's only noticeably dishonest when it comes to Jews and Israel.

    Keep him away from that, and he's okay...not great, but okay.

    The inference is that Jack would be alright -- if only he forgot about being a Jew. It's his Judaism that is the problem.

    We know that there is good within you, Jack...

    Replies: @William Badwhite

  359. @anonymous
    @Anonymous


    Jack D probably covers a wider breadth of subject matter than any other single commenter on this blog.
     
    He is a greater content lifter than any other single commenter on this blog. Not only does he copy from wikipedia but from various publications without attribution. For example, when the US began supplying the Javelin to Ukraine, the Financial Times published an article explaining how it works. Jack D spent a lot of effort rewriting that article and posting it here as his own comment. About that time, when an Su-25 was shot down and video of the pilot ejecting was posted on Twitter, Jack D scraped the comment thread and rewrote it as a comment he posted here.
    About then I began ignoring hist posts but I'm sure he has continued to do that as he has always done. He has even scraped and rewrote content I've published elsewhere about my own profession and presented it as his own. Why he would expend so much effort just to make comments on Sailer's blog I can't imagine.
    He must have extreme self-esteem issues, or perhaps have a gigantic ego that makes him so annoying in life that no one wants to associate with him, so he comes to this blog because his comments don't get blocked and he can strut and preen to his heart's desire.
    Enjoy his posts if you like, but keep in mind that when he writes -- or rewrites -- he often misunderstands or gets things wrong. So whether he is posting about pot-bellied stoves, Iraqi air defenses in the Iraq War, movie studios in Hollywood or learning foreign languages, he doesn't know what he is talking about and is just another time-wasting blowhard.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @New Dealer, @Mike Tre, @J.Ross, @Bernard

    So whether he is posting about pot-bellied stoves, Iraqi air defenses in the Iraq War, movie studios in Hollywood or learning foreign languages, he doesn’t know what he is talking about and is just another time-wasting blowhard.

    I think you’re being a little harsh, though I acknowledge Jack is a know it all. He’s a great resource if you don’t want to do the research on non political subjects. I’ve enjoyed some of his insights on practical matters.

    I like the banter he creates. Responses to his posts are often quite educating and thoughtful.

    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
    @Bernard

    On Jack D:


    I like the banter he creates. Responses to his posts are often quite educating and thoughtful.
     
    In other words casting pearls before swine is not always a waste. Sometimes people come by to pick the pearls out of the muck after the pig has turned up its nose.
  360. @anonymous
    Current New Thing:

    America regularly losing due to DEI hires and the resulting erosion of our collective IQ required to manage complex tasks.

    Conclusion: Diversity for its own sake is societal poison for generations.

    https://nypost.com/2024/03/01/us-news/first-us-moon-lander-in-half-a-century-stops-working-a-week-after-tipping-over-at-touchdown/

    Replies: @Joe Stalin

    The US moon lander did pretty good considering that one of the primary landing instruments failed and they resorted to an on-board instrument not ment to be used for landing.

    They landed the thing intact.

    It’s hard to get to the moon intact with everything working, as JPL can attest to.

  361. @Anonymous
    @res

    I appreciate when people engage honestly and logically with Jack D (and anyone else) when he is wrong, citing sources. You yourself have done this this and I am grateful. That said...
    A lot of commenters here simply must believe that they are smarter, wiser, and/or gooder than anyone who disagrees with them on anything. Thus when confronted by Jack D, they self-servingly and in my opinion obnoxiously magnify his flaws. He sometimes gets things wrong and garbles details in his voluminous output? Fraud! He writes things he read somewhere else? Cheater! He's ethnocentric and thinks highly of Jews? Wicked enemy of White civilization! These people really do themselves a disservice because Jack writes a lot of great comments--even the ones with logical lapses or factual inaccuracies are generally thought-provoking. (I guess a lot of people don't come here to think, they come to circlejerk, or whine about Steve not being Anglin or Zerohedge, but anyway...) And he's obviously not a parrot (or a committee LOL): he has a consistent personal voice in his writing regardless of however much of his knowledge stays in his head at once. (Which is a lot more than others are implying: if you want to pad your comments with relevant info from Wikipedia or wherever else, you have to know something already to even know what's worth looking up. Especially at Jack's pace.)

    Replies: @res, @William Badwhite, @Stripes Duncan

    A lot of commenters here simply must believe that they are smarter, wiser, and/or gooder than anyone who disagrees with them on anything.

    This has been my experience with the entirety of the online dissident right for as long as I’ve dabbled in it. In my opinion it’s our biggest flaw.

  362. @res
    @New Dealer

    I see it under all reviews now. See if this works.
    https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-reviews/R2DAN9BF7Z2CY5/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B0CKVJ66JR

    Here is the review text.


    As a lifelong rural resident and a former conservative they were able to accurately express the phenomenon I’ve seen occur here. I was falling prey to the right wing propagandists myself but over time I saw them moving away from ideas of freedom and democracy. I’ve seen where my fellow rural Americans have gone and it’s been astonishing to watch them wholeheartedly swallow everything. Very tribal in the thinking. Being a part of the community means accepting crazy conspiracies and thinking city ppl are coming to do something to you. It’s not very constructive. Thank you for writing this book, you got it right, I’m a witness.
     

    Replies: @Anonymous, @New Dealer

    Yup, my mistake maybe.

  363. @Bardon Kaldian
    @Muggles

    I just say what he says:

    https://www.israelhayom.com/opinions/its-time-to-isolate-anti-vaxxers-from-the-rest-of-society/

    It's time to isolate anti-vaxxers from the rest of society

    Replies: @HA, @Muggles

    What he says, and you you echo, is fascist.

    The feeble logic is based on nothing but fantasy.

    Evidence is now pretty conclusive on the facts of vax vs. non vax. The vax wasn’t magic.

    Of course Jews as a group (many, not all) seem pretty paranoid about any social “risks” and thus those Jews are quite ready to become some sick version of Hitler.

    I won’t clog up the comments here on this.

    But if you think bullying or imposing crazed fear based authoritarian measures is any solution to anything, you are part of the problem. Hitler (to use a tired trope) used the same warped logic for his “final solution” for European “genetic health.”

    Oh, but he was wrong about that…

    You and your Israeli buddy are of course infallible truth knowers.

  364. @res
    @Frau Katze

    That is extreme, but something of the sort is not that rare for something both controversial and obscure. For more popular things the combination of the woke masses and comment censorship tends to limit it.

    Right now there are 12 ratings (10 reviews) and the distribution is a near-perfect anti-Bell curve. 39/11/0/11/39%

    Note that the 5 negative reviews are being underweighted in the average.

    Replies: @Frau Katze

    Re: White Rural Rage

    Sounds like it would make a good book review for Steve. It would likely generate lots of comments.

  365. anonymous[406] • Disclaimer says:

    Current New Thing: Wee Slovenly Fat Chicks in Law Enforcement

    Thoughts: We need more plumbers. Plumbers rates are through the roof. Why don’t America’s slovenly fat chicks get into the plumbing trade? They’d make more money than this silly shit. They’d also be able to show their ass crack without harsh judgement.

    It’s a job made in heaven for surly, yet conscientious lesbians.

    Why do women, especially the fat ugly ones, reject learning trades? Theres nothing to stop them but their competence.

    https://www.newsweek.com/fbi-arresting-reporter-sparks-maga-outrage-1875173#slideshow/2356338

  366. @Bernard
    @anonymous


    So whether he is posting about pot-bellied stoves, Iraqi air defenses in the Iraq War, movie studios in Hollywood or learning foreign languages, he doesn’t know what he is talking about and is just another time-wasting blowhard.
     
    I think you’re being a little harsh, though I acknowledge Jack is a know it all. He’s a great resource if you don’t want to do the research on non political subjects. I’ve enjoyed some of his insights on practical matters.

    I like the banter he creates. Responses to his posts are often quite educating and thoughtful.

    Replies: @Cagey Beast

    On Jack D:

    I like the banter he creates. Responses to his posts are often quite educating and thoughtful.

    In other words casting pearls before swine is not always a waste. Sometimes people come by to pick the pearls out of the muck after the pig has turned up its nose.

  367. Hopefully the new current thing is for antifa nerds to light themselves on fire and leave behind a small scorch mark on the pavement.

    Oh well, at least no one got hurt.

  368. @SFG
    @Mike Tre

    You think people who post on largely-anonymous internet sites regarding taboo topics are more, or less argumentative than the average person?

    Replies: @Mike Tre

    Are you really justifying Jack D’s shtick? There are plenty of honest, argumentative people.

  369. @Jack D
    @Colin Wright


    First, you obviously are referring to the participation (often with the alternative of death by starvation in a POW camp) of some Ukrainians in the Holocaust.
     
    Do the marchers in this photo look like they are starving and being forced to march in this parade?

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b0/%D0%9F%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B4_%D0%B2_%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B5_%28%D0%98%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE-%D0%A4%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA%29_%D0%B2_%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C_%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B0_%D0%B3%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BB-%D0%B3%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B0_%D0%9F%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%88%D0%B8_%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B9%D1%85%D1%81%D0%BB%D1%8F%D0%B9%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0_%D0%93%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%B0_%D0%A4%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_2.jpeg

    They look pretty well fed to me. And they were marking specifically under the banner of Ukrainian nationalism.

    My father was in a situation where he really was starving and in a camp and he could have collaborated with the Germans as a kapo and he didn't. He would have rather died. When he was on his deathbed one of the last things he said to me (in Yiddish) was " I want you to know that I did not do wrong to anyone." He meant specifically this.

    The "Jewish" commissars were no longer Jewish at all. They were converts to the new religion of Communism. The did not act as Jews but as Communists. They denounced Judaism along with all other religions as the opiate of the masses and they closed synagogues and imprisoned rabbis. I feel no more responsible for their actions as a Jew than I would if they had take vows as Catholic priests and participated in the Inquisition (that happened too).

    Replies: @Colin Wright, @Colin Wright

    Do the marchers in this photo look like they are starving and being forced to march in this parade?

    Those? I feel sorry for them. They don’t particularly want to return to a Galicia lorded over by Poles, and they know they don’t want the Communists back. They’re hoping the Germans will let them have a decent life.

    They would have been disappointed — but I don’t condemn them.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Colin Wright


    I don’t condemn them.
     
    I'll bet you don't. Jew killing is always good. The Nazi aligned Ukrainians were equal opportunity killers - they also massacred the local Polish population as well as the local Jews:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lviv_pogroms_(1941)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massacres_of_Poles_in_Volhynia_and_Eastern_Galicia

    They did this stuff on their own - it was too much even for the Nazis, who told them to tone it down a bit. When Himmler tells you to tone it down, you know that it's over the top.

    Sure the Ukrainians were caught between a rock and a hard place (look, even today 80 years later their national existence is still up for grabs) but genocide is never the answer.

    “For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?”

    Replies: @Frau Katze, @Colin Wright

  370. @res
    @Anonymous

    A lot to that. I strongly agree with this in particular.


    he has a consistent personal voice in his writing regardless of however much of his knowledge stays in his head at once. (Which is a lot more than others are implying: if you want to pad your comments with relevant info from Wikipedia or wherever else, you have to know something already to even know what’s worth looking up. Especially at Jack’s pace.)
     
    I tend to do something like that frequently. I find giving sources (and Wikipedia tends to be a decent start as long as you take care around controversial topics) helpful to save time, provide a summary better than I could do without significant effort, avoid simple mistakes (e.g. refresh my own knowledge first when it is partial), and provide further references.

    One big fault line here is how much different people value statistics and analysis vs. lived experience and deeply held opinions.

    Replies: @David Davenport

    One big fault line here is how much different people value statistics and analysis vs. lived experience and deeply held opinions.

    “Lived experience”– Everybody who’s lived a while has some of that. So what? Some are right, and some are wrong.

    “Deeply held opinions” — are still just opinions.

  371. @Colin Wright
    @Jack D


    'This is not true. You can be a Jew and do despicable things and remain a Jew and I will despise you. Kapos come to mind. The only mendacity here is yours when you try to tar all Jews with the sins of the Stalinist apostates – a classic antisemitic lie straight out of the Nazi playbook'
     
    Significantly, Kapos would be Jews who do bad things to other Jews. Let's hear you condemn Bolshevik Jews, or the Jews of Israel, or for that matter, the Jews of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society.

    ...but you're still evading the issue. My original point is that it's a one-way street with you; if Jews are victims, or collectively have some positive aspect, you're part of the community. If it's the reverse, nothing to do with you. I'm me and they're them.

    Replies: @Wielgus, @Jack D

    A related issue is the tendency – not necessarily limited to Jews – to find some other identity for Jews who do bad things.
    The London slum landlord Peter Rachman is an example. In references to him he is often described as a “Pole” and he was born in pre-WW2 Poland, but though he became wealthy in Britain he never acquired British citizenship. The fact that he was a Jew – his last name possibly and ironically derived from Yiddish rachmones or “compassion” -is often slipped down the memory hole.

    • Agree: Colin Wright
  372. @Frau Katze
    @res

    I don’t like the description on Amazon of “White Rural Rage”


    In White Rural Rage, Tom Schaller and Paul Waldman explore why rural Whites have failed to reap the benefits from their outsize political power and why, as a result, they are the most likely group to abandon democratic norms and traditions. Their rage—stoked daily by Republican politicians and the conservative media—now poses an existential threat to the United States.

    Schaller and Waldman show how vulnerable U.S. democracy has become to rural Whites who, despite legitimate grievances, are increasingly inclined to hold racist and xenophobic beliefs, to believe in conspiracy theories, to accept violence as a legitimate course of political action, and to exhibit antidemocratic tendencies.
     
    They’re racist because they don’t like getting passed over for promotion because they’re white men. And I guess if they don’t like a totally open border they’re xenophobic.

    Replies: @Colin Wright, @deep anonymous

    “In White Rural Rage, Tom Schaller and Paul Waldman explore why rural Whites have failed to reap the benefits from their outsize political power . . .”

    (quoted from the review)

    In what universe do rural Whites have ANY political power, let alone “outsize[d]” power? This is just more gaslighting 101 (aka bullsh-t) from our (((verbalist overclass))).

    Just a few years ago, Angus Deaton and his wife, whose name I don’t recall (don’t mean to denigrate her, she was a co-author) explained the impact of the opioid epidemic on White rural communities. “Deaths of despair” is what they called them. Despair caused by loss of any meaningful employment opportunities, loss of communities, loss of self—in a word, total, absolute loss of political, social, and economic power.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @deep anonymous


    our (((verbalist overclass))).
     
    Tom Schaller is of German and Italian descent. Not a drop of Jewish blood in him.

    The Men of Unz have special glasses - when a Jew and a Gentile write or do something that they don't like, they see (and condemn) only the Jew. Waldman somehow implicates all Jews but Schaller speaks only for himself and does not implicate Germans or Christians or anybody.

    Replies: @Colin Wright

  373. @Twinkie
    @SFG


    think somebody said here there was sort of a hierarchy with white guys marrying ethnic women, the rich and UMC guys married Asians, the middle class married Hispanics, the lower class married blacks.
     
    Actually, all males in America who marry out of their ethno-racial group are up-selected economically (meaning, they form a higher income couple than males who marry their ethno-racial kin). Meaning, white males who marry Asian, Hispanic, and black women all have higher average couple income than white males who marry white females. However, the level of selectivity varies:

    https://static01.nyt.com/images/2012/02/16/business/economy/economix-17interracial/economix-17interracial-blog480.jpg

    Replies: @SFG

    Dang, over 2.5x as many WMAF as AMWF? No wonder the Asian guys are upset. (Same for the black women.)

    Anyway, looks like the difference between white guys who marry Hispanic, black, and white women is pretty minuscule as far as total household income goes. The only real outlier is the emergent Wasian master race.

    Conversely, the white women who marry out seem to be marrying down…unless it’s an Asian guy.

    My guess is what’s going on is the Asian-white couples (either direction) are selected for being in the UMC that’s not supposed to care about race. Homogeneous black and Hispanic couples are blue-collar or recent immigrants. The rest, I guess white guys still make a little more money.

    • Replies: @Twinkie
    @SFG


    Dang, over 2.5x as many WMAF as AMWF? No wonder the Asian guys are upset.
     
    Why should they be? There are more than twice as many Asian women who married Asian men as those who married white men, despite there being something like 20 times as many white men as Asian men in the U.S.

    (Same for the black women.)
     
    Black women are upset, because they can't get any men, black or otherwise. They literally have the lowest marriage rate among all people in the U.S. Meanwhile, Asian males have the highest marriage rate among all men in the U.S. So, no, not the same as black women.

    Something like over 60% of all Asian adult males are married in the U.S. There just aren't enough Asian single men to go around for the ladies, I am afraid. ;)

    Anyway, looks like the difference between white guys who marry Hispanic, black, and white women is pretty minuscule as far as total household income goes. The only real outlier is the emergent Wasian master race.
     
    Yup, when you account for geography (probably more white-Hispanic and white-black marriages in urban areas where the nominal incomes are higher), my guess is that the white men who marry Hispanic or black women are probably not up-selected and may even be slightly down-selected. But we need more granular data for making that determination with greater certainty.

    Conversely, the white women who marry out seem to be marrying down…unless it’s an Asian guy.

    My guess is what’s going on is the Asian-white couples (either direction) are selected for being in the UMC that’s not supposed to care about race.
     
    What's going on is assortative marriage, in terms of income, education attainment, and social status. I met my wife in college, for example.
  374. @AnotherDad
    @MEH 0910


    Ethan Coen’s New Movie Has Disastrous Box Office Opening, Misses Top 5 In First Weekend
    The new Ethan Coen movie Drive-Away Dolls barely makes it into the Top 10 in its domestic opening weekend, landing at No. 8 with a paltry debut.
     
    LOL.

    Amazing these people can not figure out the obvious. Queers--I mean male queers, the word apparently has been repurposed to something or another--are viscerally disgusting, but lesbians are just boring.

    Women and their stories are interesting because of sex--their capability to make babies with a man. Therefore man-woman coupling, "who will match with and make babies with whom?"--which speaks to lineage and the future--is of some dramatic interest.

    Men can be of interest beyond that. Men make war and ergo decide the fate of nations and empires. Men break the law and other men hunt down and suppress the lawbreakers. Men sail around the world and discover new lands. Men come up with new ideas and inventions and make things that fly and go boom. Some drama.

    Women, strip away sex--the "who will she make babies with"--are rather boring. They ... talk.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Mike Tre, @Twinkie, @Looger, @Jack D, @New Dealer, @R.G. Camara, @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Corvinus

    “Women, strip away sex–the “who will she make babies with”–are rather boring. They … talk.”

    Spoken like a man who talks tough on the Internet but in reality has his ball sack firmly in the vice grip of his wife.

    • Replies: @Chris D
    @Corvinus

    Greetings, I need some emotional help.

    I discovered the Red Pill, specifically Heartiste. I found that you commented on his stuff.

    I came across this article of his.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20170224001854/http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2010/03/10/why-do-conservatives-sanctify-women/

    The way he describes what women can do, what they have done to him, enthusiastically. Is this all women? Is it all in the end a matter of power, status and sex? Is there no higher virtue?

    This whole thing scares me. I know I shouldn’t pedestalize women, but are we all so mmoral and capable of sin? I feel like I am in an abyss of meaning. Is this Heartiste guy right about the world?

    I’d like to hear your thoughts.

    Replies: @Corvinus

  375. @Corvinus
    @AnotherDad

    “Women, strip away sex–the “who will she make babies with”–are rather boring. They … talk.”

    Spoken like a man who talks tough on the Internet but in reality has his ball sack firmly in the vice grip of his wife.

    Replies: @Chris D

    Greetings, I need some emotional help.

    I discovered the Red Pill, specifically Heartiste. I found that you commented on his stuff.

    I came across this article of his.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20170224001854/http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2010/03/10/why-do-conservatives-sanctify-women/

    The way he describes what women can do, what they have done to him, enthusiastically. Is this all women? Is it all in the end a matter of power, status and sex? Is there no higher virtue?

    This whole thing scares me. I know I shouldn’t pedestalize women, but are we all so mmoral and capable of sin? I feel like I am in an abyss of meaning. Is this Heartiste guy right about the world?

    I’d like to hear your thoughts.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    @Chris D

    “I discovered the Red Pill, specifically Heartiste”

    You’re 14 years too late. That era is long gone.

    “The way he describes what women can do, what they have done to him, enthusiastically”

    You do realize that there it is only HIS version of what happened. How are we certain that these conquests are real? Furthermore, he admits that he plundered women who had boyfriends or were married. That speaks more to his lack of character. He was willing to use his charms to get whatever he wanted sexually. Is that someone who you want to base your life around?

    “I know I shouldn’t pedestalize women”

    Then don’t. Quite easy, actually. Steer clear of women who early on in the relationship are vain or jealous or who chastise you. Assert yourself when needed. Don’t be scared of her breaking up with you merely because you don’t jump through her hoops that end up making you feel miserable. As George Castanza once quipped, “I got hand”. And as Kramer stated, “Engage the pre-emptive
    breakup”.

    Finally, have options. Nothing wrong with dating two or more women in the first six weeks or so to find out for yourself whom you are most compatible with. Women are doing the same thing.

    Your homework? Should you tell either one of them of what you are doing? One paragraph with justification. Go….

  376. @Colin Wright
    @Jack D


    Do the marchers in this photo look like they are starving and being forced to march in this parade?

     

    Those? I feel sorry for them. They don't particularly want to return to a Galicia lorded over by Poles, and they know they don't want the Communists back. They're hoping the Germans will let them have a decent life.

    They would have been disappointed -- but I don't condemn them.

    Replies: @Jack D

    I don’t condemn them.

    I’ll bet you don’t. Jew killing is always good. The Nazi aligned Ukrainians were equal opportunity killers – they also massacred the local Polish population as well as the local Jews:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lviv_pogroms_(1941)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massacres_of_Poles_in_Volhynia_and_Eastern_Galicia

    They did this stuff on their own – it was too much even for the Nazis, who told them to tone it down a bit. When Himmler tells you to tone it down, you know that it’s over the top.

    Sure the Ukrainians were caught between a rock and a hard place (look, even today 80 years later their national existence is still up for grabs) but genocide is never the answer.

    “For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?”

    • Replies: @Frau Katze
    @Jack D

    The whole Communist vs Nazi thing is definitely complicated.

    I was just reading about a Lithuanian Jewish man who fought for the Communists in WW2 and is now regarded by some present day Lithuanians as trash.

    One statement I noticed: Stalin killed off the (non-Jewish) Lithuanian intelligentsia.

    In this case, has the intelligentsia ever recovered? Given that IQ is strongly inherited, it might not have.

    Replies: @Jack D

    , @Colin Wright
    @Jack D


    'I’ll bet you don’t. Jew killing is always good...'
     
    Perhaps you'd care to document your implication there -- or will it be like your claim that I have expressed an especial solicitude for Jews?

    When all else fails, just make something up and refuse to support it? Why not just write my posts for me? Then I'll say exactly what you need me to say.
  377. @deep anonymous
    @Frau Katze


    "In White Rural Rage, Tom Schaller and Paul Waldman explore why rural Whites have failed to reap the benefits from their outsize political power . . ."
     
    (quoted from the review)

    In what universe do rural Whites have ANY political power, let alone "outsize[d]" power? This is just more gaslighting 101 (aka bullsh-t) from our (((verbalist overclass))).

    Just a few years ago, Angus Deaton and his wife, whose name I don't recall (don't mean to denigrate her, she was a co-author) explained the impact of the opioid epidemic on White rural communities. "Deaths of despair" is what they called them. Despair caused by loss of any meaningful employment opportunities, loss of communities, loss of self---in a word, total, absolute loss of political, social, and economic power.

    Replies: @Jack D

    our (((verbalist overclass))).

    Tom Schaller is of German and Italian descent. Not a drop of Jewish blood in him.

    The Men of Unz have special glasses – when a Jew and a Gentile write or do something that they don’t like, they see (and condemn) only the Jew. Waldman somehow implicates all Jews but Schaller speaks only for himself and does not implicate Germans or Christians or anybody.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    @Jack D


    '...The Men of Unz have special glasses – when a Jew and a Gentile write or do something that they don’t like, they see (and condemn) only the Jew...'
     
    I'm afraid the truth is almost tediously the reverse. Often, I read something discussing some modern horror: gender 'affirmation' for minors, the subversion of the 2020 election, Black Bullshit matters.

    Sometimes, I have the energy to look up the names mentioned in the article as advocating whatever. Conservatively, three out of every four will turn out to be Jews. One out of every four could be explained away -- more energy, a higher IQ, tilted towards verbal skills, blah blah blah. I wouldn't read too much into one out of four. Even if that would be over-representation by an entire order of magnitude...

    But three out of four? We can't pretend everything's just fine. It's not.

    I would like to not be antisemitic. I would like to be twenty five. However, reality keeps frustrating these preferences.

    It's not me, Jack. It's you.
  378. @Jack D
    @Colin Wright


    I don’t condemn them.
     
    I'll bet you don't. Jew killing is always good. The Nazi aligned Ukrainians were equal opportunity killers - they also massacred the local Polish population as well as the local Jews:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lviv_pogroms_(1941)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massacres_of_Poles_in_Volhynia_and_Eastern_Galicia

    They did this stuff on their own - it was too much even for the Nazis, who told them to tone it down a bit. When Himmler tells you to tone it down, you know that it's over the top.

    Sure the Ukrainians were caught between a rock and a hard place (look, even today 80 years later their national existence is still up for grabs) but genocide is never the answer.

    “For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?”

    Replies: @Frau Katze, @Colin Wright

    The whole Communist vs Nazi thing is definitely complicated.

    I was just reading about a Lithuanian Jewish man who fought for the Communists in WW2 and is now regarded by some present day Lithuanians as trash.

    One statement I noticed: Stalin killed off the (non-Jewish) Lithuanian intelligentsia.

    In this case, has the intelligentsia ever recovered? Given that IQ is strongly inherited, it might not have.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Frau Katze

    All of Eastern Europe had a very rough and dysgenic 20th century. These were newly independent baby countries that emerged from WWI and did not have a big local elite or intelligentsia to begin with - they had been ruled from afar for centuries. The closest thing the Ukrainians had to an intelligentsia was their clergy - the priest was often the only Ukrainian guy in town who could read and write in their language. The ethnicity of the local peasants was often different from that of the rulers and now the peasants were in charge - sort of like the situation in the Reconstruction South.

    Then in 1939-40, the Soviets came and killed or arrested what little local elites they had. Then in '41, the Germans came back and killed or arrested anyone who had collaborated with the Soviets. Then in '44, the Soviets came back again and killed or arrested anyone who had collaborated with the Germans. When it was all done, it was a miracle that ANYONE was left, especially anyone with two brain cells to rub together. (And this is putting aside the loss of their high IQ Jewish population - for example in Hungary when people speak about the great Hungarian scientific geniuses like von Neumann and Teller, they are really talking about Jewish geniuses.)

    Has this had a durable effect on the IQ of those who were still alive when the dust settled? I can't say for sure but it sure didn't help.

    Replies: @Frau Katze, @Colin Wright

  379. @Colin Wright
    @Jack D


    'This is not true. You can be a Jew and do despicable things and remain a Jew and I will despise you. Kapos come to mind. The only mendacity here is yours when you try to tar all Jews with the sins of the Stalinist apostates – a classic antisemitic lie straight out of the Nazi playbook'
     
    Significantly, Kapos would be Jews who do bad things to other Jews. Let's hear you condemn Bolshevik Jews, or the Jews of Israel, or for that matter, the Jews of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society.

    ...but you're still evading the issue. My original point is that it's a one-way street with you; if Jews are victims, or collectively have some positive aspect, you're part of the community. If it's the reverse, nothing to do with you. I'm me and they're them.

    Replies: @Wielgus, @Jack D

    Thank God that the Men of Unz never do this. Whenever HIAS is condemned, they are always careful to also condemn Lutheran Charities and Catholic Charities. When a book that they don’t like is authored by a Jew and a Christian they equally condemn “our Jewish verbalist overlords” and “our Christian verbalist overlords”.

    Oh no, wait, they don’t. The comments here are filled with blood libels against Jews that would make Goebbels blush and assign Jews 100% blame for everything that they think is wrong with our society. Did you know that Jews really DO use the blood of Christian children to make matzo? I would gladly accept that Jews (as a disproportionately elite high IQ minority) deserve 20 or 25% blame for some of our societal ills just like they deserve 20 or 25% credit for postwar American scientific accomplishments, but the Men of Unz blame them 100%.

    I don’t think you need any extra condemnation of Jews from me – I think others are handling that POV more than adequately here, including you. But I guess having the Unz antisemitism meter at 10 is not good enough for you. You want it turned up to 11.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    @Jack D


    '...But I guess having the Unz antisemitism meter at 10 is not good enough for you. You want it turned up to 11.'
     
    But however did that meter get turned up?

    I think you're reversing cause and effect here. I was genuinely, impeccably non-antisemitic for the first forty years of my life -- really. Depending on how one counted, a good twenty to thirty percent of the people I grew up with were Jewish -- but Jewishness just wasn't a significant aspect of someone's identity. I'm not really sure, since I wasn't counting at the time. Looking back, I can see that he was Jewish, and she was Jewish, and halachically, he would have been Jewish, but back then, it just didn't matter much. At most, it was like being a vegetarian, or a Lutheran -- or having detached earlobes. 'Oh. Gee -- that's dull. What were we talking about?'

    Then I started noticing Israel's crimes -- and well, things expanded from there. As of about 2010, it was already 'Jews would be alright, if only I could forget about Israel.' But that isn't the case, is it? There's so much more...

    And here we are. But it wasn't my idea. Nor were they my actions that led us to this point.

    So why don't you account for our anti-semitism? You began it. After all, I'm not anti-Mormon, or anti-Pole, or anti-Chinese, or anti-Hispanic. So why am I anti-semitic?

    Replies: @Wielgus, @William Badwhite

    , @Colin Wright
    @Jack D


    'Thank God that the Men of Unz never do this...'
     
    ...and I note that you still evade the issue. Why is that, Jack? What is so awkward about the point I originally raised?
    , @Colin Wright
    @Jack D


    'Thank God that the Men of Unz never do this. Whenever HIAS is condemned, they are always careful to also condemn Lutheran Charities and Catholic Charities...'
     
    Give credit where credit is due. I think you actually have a point here.

    For a while there, when they seemed to be making a serious effort to dump Africans into our nice, white town, you would see these little convoys of obviously fresh-off-the-plane Africans (look for no socks and pajama bottoms for trousers) being shepherded around the local supermarket by virtuous-looking white women. 'This is how we get food in America...'

    Anyway, I'll bet on the women being Christians from some progressive denomination, being all virtuous and shit, not Jews.

    ...but as I've argued with others, Jack, it's a matter of proportion. There's a balance: the urge to sympathize versus the need to preserve a functioning society. That's always been there: we regulated railroads all by ourselves, without your help. Teddy Roosevelt had Booker T. Washington to dinner in the White House. We started actually trying to help the Indians.

    No one -- or at least not I -- says that we would or even should have some pre-modern, hierarchical paradise absent Jews. But perhaps we would have stopped somewhere short of open borders and mutilating children and encouraging blacks to run amok and...

    If it weren't for Jews. Look at where you all push down on the scale, and to what effect.

    Indeed, picture society as a giant balance scale, with all of us scattered along the beam at various points. There's me, pushing down here, and that benighted Corvinus pushing down there, and some of our real loonies, all the way over there...

    And here comes Jack, weighing four hundred pounds, and sits down right at one end. The scale tilts, and he says 'who, me? You're just being antisemitic.'

    I don't even deny you your right to plop yourself down wherever you like. The Mormons do. Poles presumably do. It's their prerogative.

    And it would be yours -- if only you didn't push the beam down so far. You're having it all your own way -- and it's killing us.

  380. @Chris D
    @Corvinus

    Greetings, I need some emotional help.

    I discovered the Red Pill, specifically Heartiste. I found that you commented on his stuff.

    I came across this article of his.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20170224001854/http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2010/03/10/why-do-conservatives-sanctify-women/

    The way he describes what women can do, what they have done to him, enthusiastically. Is this all women? Is it all in the end a matter of power, status and sex? Is there no higher virtue?

    This whole thing scares me. I know I shouldn’t pedestalize women, but are we all so mmoral and capable of sin? I feel like I am in an abyss of meaning. Is this Heartiste guy right about the world?

    I’d like to hear your thoughts.

    Replies: @Corvinus

    “I discovered the Red Pill, specifically Heartiste”

    You’re 14 years too late. That era is long gone.

    “The way he describes what women can do, what they have done to him, enthusiastically”

    You do realize that there it is only HIS version of what happened. How are we certain that these conquests are real? Furthermore, he admits that he plundered women who had boyfriends or were married. That speaks more to his lack of character. He was willing to use his charms to get whatever he wanted sexually. Is that someone who you want to base your life around?

    “I know I shouldn’t pedestalize women”

    Then don’t. Quite easy, actually. Steer clear of women who early on in the relationship are vain or jealous or who chastise you. Assert yourself when needed. Don’t be scared of her breaking up with you merely because you don’t jump through her hoops that end up making you feel miserable. As George Castanza once quipped, “I got hand”. And as Kramer stated, “Engage the pre-emptive
    breakup”.

    Finally, have options. Nothing wrong with dating two or more women in the first six weeks or so to find out for yourself whom you are most compatible with. Women are doing the same thing.

    Your homework? Should you tell either one of them of what you are doing? One paragraph with justification. Go….

  381. @Frau Katze
    @Jack D

    The whole Communist vs Nazi thing is definitely complicated.

    I was just reading about a Lithuanian Jewish man who fought for the Communists in WW2 and is now regarded by some present day Lithuanians as trash.

    One statement I noticed: Stalin killed off the (non-Jewish) Lithuanian intelligentsia.

    In this case, has the intelligentsia ever recovered? Given that IQ is strongly inherited, it might not have.

    Replies: @Jack D

    All of Eastern Europe had a very rough and dysgenic 20th century. These were newly independent baby countries that emerged from WWI and did not have a big local elite or intelligentsia to begin with – they had been ruled from afar for centuries. The closest thing the Ukrainians had to an intelligentsia was their clergy – the priest was often the only Ukrainian guy in town who could read and write in their language. The ethnicity of the local peasants was often different from that of the rulers and now the peasants were in charge – sort of like the situation in the Reconstruction South.

    Then in 1939-40, the Soviets came and killed or arrested what little local elites they had. Then in ’41, the Germans came back and killed or arrested anyone who had collaborated with the Soviets. Then in ’44, the Soviets came back again and killed or arrested anyone who had collaborated with the Germans. When it was all done, it was a miracle that ANYONE was left, especially anyone with two brain cells to rub together. (And this is putting aside the loss of their high IQ Jewish population – for example in Hungary when people speak about the great Hungarian scientific geniuses like von Neumann and Teller, they are really talking about Jewish geniuses.)

    Has this had a durable effect on the IQ of those who were still alive when the dust settled? I can’t say for sure but it sure didn’t help.

    • Replies: @Frau Katze
    @Jack D

    We have a sizeable Ukrainian diaspora here in Canada. The prairies resemble parts of Ukraine and many settled there. Most came before WW 1.

    My nephew in Alberta is married to a woman of Ukrainian descent. An old friend married a Ukrainian years ago.

    Our current Minister of Finance, Chrystia Freeland has a Ukrainian grandfather who, it turns out, was a Nazi in WW2. She didn’t volunteer the information and when the news came out she said it was Russian disinformation, but in this case it wasn’t.

    So the fate of Ukraine is a bigger deal in Canada than in the US.

    , @Colin Wright
    @Jack D


    '(And this is putting aside the loss of their high IQ Jewish population...'
     
    ...and look at how Ukrainian civilization flowered under the Jews.

    Replies: @Wielgus

  382. @Jack D
    @Colin Wright


    I don’t condemn them.
     
    I'll bet you don't. Jew killing is always good. The Nazi aligned Ukrainians were equal opportunity killers - they also massacred the local Polish population as well as the local Jews:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lviv_pogroms_(1941)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massacres_of_Poles_in_Volhynia_and_Eastern_Galicia

    They did this stuff on their own - it was too much even for the Nazis, who told them to tone it down a bit. When Himmler tells you to tone it down, you know that it's over the top.

    Sure the Ukrainians were caught between a rock and a hard place (look, even today 80 years later their national existence is still up for grabs) but genocide is never the answer.

    “For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?”

    Replies: @Frau Katze, @Colin Wright

    ‘I’ll bet you don’t. Jew killing is always good…’

    Perhaps you’d care to document your implication there — or will it be like your claim that I have expressed an especial solicitude for Jews?

    When all else fails, just make something up and refuse to support it? Why not just write my posts for me? Then I’ll say exactly what you need me to say.

  383. @William Badwhite
    @Anonymous

    Thanks Jack!

    obnoxiously magnify his flaws. He sometimes gets things wrong and garbles details in his voluminous output? Fraud! He writes things he read somewhere else? Cheater! He’s ethnocentric and thinks highly of Jews? Wicked enemy of White civilization!
     

    People object to Jack because of his pervasive dishonesty. And to the "voluminous output" which you reference. But mainly to the dishonesty. And the ethnocentrism for me but not for thee. But mainly the dishonesty.

    Replies: @Colin Wright

    ‘…People object to Jack because of his pervasive dishonesty…’

    The exasperating thing is that he’s only noticeably dishonest when it comes to Jews and Israel.

    Keep him away from that, and he’s okay…not great, but okay.

    The inference is that Jack would be alright — if only he forgot about being a Jew. It’s his Judaism that is the problem.

    We know that there is good within you, Jack…

    • Replies: @William Badwhite
    @Colin Wright


    The exasperating thing is that he’s only noticeably dishonest when it comes to Jews and Israel.
     
    And Russia. His thousands and thousands of Russia/Ukraine posts show the same pervasive dishonesty. I'd guess Jack thinks of himself as highly intelligent, however his "argument" style is highly emotional and based on a number of set views that no amount of evidence will move him off of. He is not really arguing, so much as just spewing his views.

    Keep him away from that, and he’s okay…not great, but okay.
     
    Even that is mostly non-attributed regurgitation of stuff from elsewhere.

    We know that there is good within you, Jack…
     

    Maybe in other walks of life, but not here. If the purpose of the comments section is to advance arguments and generally improve the quality of the site, he is a zero. To start, Yack D does not read and digest what other commenters write. He scans it, rephrases it into something wildly different from what the commenter wrote, then argues with what he came up with. That is, as Twinkie and Res and you and myself have pointed out many times, a form of LYING. But he keeps doing it. See the comment above the one I'm replying to, where you object to Jack's "I bet you don't. Jew killing is always good". Nobody wrote that "Jew killing is always good…" except him. Jack the liar.

    So what is the purpose of arguing with someone that 1) won't listen, 2) is incapable of self-reflection or admitting he's wrong, 3) takes it for granted he can read people’s minds, and 4) lies as easily as he breaths? It’s like a dog chasing its tail.

    Those who comment here frequently have "tells". Some consistently advance arguments and improve things (Alec Leamas , Arclight, yourself, Harry Baldwin, Mike Tre, SFG, Ben Tillman, and many others) and some advance arguments and improve things while at other times waste space (me, Twinkie :) ) , while others have made it clear that they are here for some other purpose - HA to make sure nobody dissents from Approved Orthodoxy and to call people names, Corvirus to be an ankle-biting pest, Johnny Walker to change the subject, etc.

    Jack has made it abundantly clear that he can not or will not contribute. So add him to "Commenters to Ignore" and move on. I agree it is a tad annoying to look at a thread for new comments, see there are say, 12. Then go to the thread and see 12 grayed out "Jack D says, Jack D says, HA says, HA says, HA says, Jack D says (Johann Ricke agrees, Frau Katze agrees)", Jack D says, HA says".

    Some other commenter suggested Steve limit the number of posts an individual can have in a given thread. It is tiresome to see a Ukraine thread with 350 comments, and 170 are from Yack and Ha, saying the same thing over and over.

  384. @Jack D
    @Colin Wright

    Thank God that the Men of Unz never do this. Whenever HIAS is condemned, they are always careful to also condemn Lutheran Charities and Catholic Charities. When a book that they don't like is authored by a Jew and a Christian they equally condemn "our Jewish verbalist overlords" and "our Christian verbalist overlords".

    Oh no, wait, they don't. The comments here are filled with blood libels against Jews that would make Goebbels blush and assign Jews 100% blame for everything that they think is wrong with our society. Did you know that Jews really DO use the blood of Christian children to make matzo? I would gladly accept that Jews (as a disproportionately elite high IQ minority) deserve 20 or 25% blame for some of our societal ills just like they deserve 20 or 25% credit for postwar American scientific accomplishments, but the Men of Unz blame them 100%.

    I don't think you need any extra condemnation of Jews from me - I think others are handling that POV more than adequately here, including you. But I guess having the Unz antisemitism meter at 10 is not good enough for you. You want it turned up to 11.

    Replies: @Colin Wright, @Colin Wright, @Colin Wright

    ‘…But I guess having the Unz antisemitism meter at 10 is not good enough for you. You want it turned up to 11.’

    But however did that meter get turned up?

    I think you’re reversing cause and effect here. I was genuinely, impeccably non-antisemitic for the first forty years of my life — really. Depending on how one counted, a good twenty to thirty percent of the people I grew up with were Jewish — but Jewishness just wasn’t a significant aspect of someone’s identity. I’m not really sure, since I wasn’t counting at the time. Looking back, I can see that he was Jewish, and she was Jewish, and halachically, he would have been Jewish, but back then, it just didn’t matter much. At most, it was like being a vegetarian, or a Lutheran — or having detached earlobes. ‘Oh. Gee — that’s dull. What were we talking about?’

    Then I started noticing Israel’s crimes — and well, things expanded from there. As of about 2010, it was already ‘Jews would be alright, if only I could forget about Israel.’ But that isn’t the case, is it? There’s so much more…

    And here we are. But it wasn’t my idea. Nor were they my actions that led us to this point.

    So why don’t you account for our anti-semitism? You began it. After all, I’m not anti-Mormon, or anti-Pole, or anti-Chinese, or anti-Hispanic. So why am I anti-semitic?

    • Replies: @Wielgus
    @Colin Wright

    As I have mentioned before, I was pro-Israeli, even vocally so, until Sabra and Chatila in 1982. The methodology was a little too familiar...

    Replies: @Colin Wright

    , @William Badwhite
    @Colin Wright


    So why don’t you account for our anti-semitism? You began it. After all, I’m not anti-Mormon, or anti-Pole, or anti-Chinese, or anti-Hispanic.
     
    Yack D is under the impression he can convince people to not be antisemitic (by which he means counter-semitic) through sheer volume of words. He doesn't understand that what matters is what people perceive, not what Jack thinks. If people think someone is an asshole, it doesn't really matter if he is or is not. Normal people would think "what am I doing that makes people think I'm an asshole"? Jack writes 1,000 words saying "here is why you're wrong about me being an exceedingly wordy asshole".

    Jews have a perception problem. People that "hate" Jews (by "hate" Jews mean "criticize") have their reasons. Jews seem to believe that they can talk people out of criticizing hating them while not changing any aspect of their behavior. They share this trait with another demographic found at the other end of the socioeconomic spectrum. For an intelligent people, its a bizarre trait.

    Replies: @Colin Wright

  385. @Jack D
    @Frau Katze

    All of Eastern Europe had a very rough and dysgenic 20th century. These were newly independent baby countries that emerged from WWI and did not have a big local elite or intelligentsia to begin with - they had been ruled from afar for centuries. The closest thing the Ukrainians had to an intelligentsia was their clergy - the priest was often the only Ukrainian guy in town who could read and write in their language. The ethnicity of the local peasants was often different from that of the rulers and now the peasants were in charge - sort of like the situation in the Reconstruction South.

    Then in 1939-40, the Soviets came and killed or arrested what little local elites they had. Then in '41, the Germans came back and killed or arrested anyone who had collaborated with the Soviets. Then in '44, the Soviets came back again and killed or arrested anyone who had collaborated with the Germans. When it was all done, it was a miracle that ANYONE was left, especially anyone with two brain cells to rub together. (And this is putting aside the loss of their high IQ Jewish population - for example in Hungary when people speak about the great Hungarian scientific geniuses like von Neumann and Teller, they are really talking about Jewish geniuses.)

    Has this had a durable effect on the IQ of those who were still alive when the dust settled? I can't say for sure but it sure didn't help.

    Replies: @Frau Katze, @Colin Wright

    We have a sizeable Ukrainian diaspora here in Canada. The prairies resemble parts of Ukraine and many settled there. Most came before WW 1.

    My nephew in Alberta is married to a woman of Ukrainian descent. An old friend married a Ukrainian years ago.

    Our current Minister of Finance, Chrystia Freeland has a Ukrainian grandfather who, it turns out, was a Nazi in WW2. She didn’t volunteer the information and when the news came out she said it was Russian disinformation, but in this case it wasn’t.

    So the fate of Ukraine is a bigger deal in Canada than in the US.

  386. @Jack D
    @Frau Katze

    All of Eastern Europe had a very rough and dysgenic 20th century. These were newly independent baby countries that emerged from WWI and did not have a big local elite or intelligentsia to begin with - they had been ruled from afar for centuries. The closest thing the Ukrainians had to an intelligentsia was their clergy - the priest was often the only Ukrainian guy in town who could read and write in their language. The ethnicity of the local peasants was often different from that of the rulers and now the peasants were in charge - sort of like the situation in the Reconstruction South.

    Then in 1939-40, the Soviets came and killed or arrested what little local elites they had. Then in '41, the Germans came back and killed or arrested anyone who had collaborated with the Soviets. Then in '44, the Soviets came back again and killed or arrested anyone who had collaborated with the Germans. When it was all done, it was a miracle that ANYONE was left, especially anyone with two brain cells to rub together. (And this is putting aside the loss of their high IQ Jewish population - for example in Hungary when people speak about the great Hungarian scientific geniuses like von Neumann and Teller, they are really talking about Jewish geniuses.)

    Has this had a durable effect on the IQ of those who were still alive when the dust settled? I can't say for sure but it sure didn't help.

    Replies: @Frau Katze, @Colin Wright

    ‘(And this is putting aside the loss of their high IQ Jewish population…’

    …and look at how Ukrainian civilization flowered under the Jews.

    • Replies: @Wielgus
    @Colin Wright

    Also note the barely-concealed assumption that Slavic Gentiles are stupid. Of course the Nazis too thought in terms of the Slavic Untermensch...

  387. @TWS
    @Anonymous

    But there's always and only one question on his plate, "Is it good for the neocons?"*


    *You thought I was going to say, "Jews" didn't you?😂

    Replies: @Mike Tre

    You did.

  388. @SFG
    @Twinkie

    Dang, over 2.5x as many WMAF as AMWF? No wonder the Asian guys are upset. (Same for the black women.)

    Anyway, looks like the difference between white guys who marry Hispanic, black, and white women is pretty minuscule as far as total household income goes. The only real outlier is the emergent Wasian master race.

    Conversely, the white women who marry out seem to be marrying down...unless it's an Asian guy.

    My guess is what's going on is the Asian-white couples (either direction) are selected for being in the UMC that's not supposed to care about race. Homogeneous black and Hispanic couples are blue-collar or recent immigrants. The rest, I guess white guys still make a little more money.

    Replies: @Twinkie

    Dang, over 2.5x as many WMAF as AMWF? No wonder the Asian guys are upset.

    Why should they be? There are more than twice as many Asian women who married Asian men as those who married white men, despite there being something like 20 times as many white men as Asian men in the U.S.

    (Same for the black women.)

    Black women are upset, because they can’t get any men, black or otherwise. They literally have the lowest marriage rate among all people in the U.S. Meanwhile, Asian males have the highest marriage rate among all men in the U.S. So, no, not the same as black women.

    Something like over 60% of all Asian adult males are married in the U.S. There just aren’t enough Asian single men to go around for the ladies, I am afraid. 😉

    Anyway, looks like the difference between white guys who marry Hispanic, black, and white women is pretty minuscule as far as total household income goes. The only real outlier is the emergent Wasian master race.

    Yup, when you account for geography (probably more white-Hispanic and white-black marriages in urban areas where the nominal incomes are higher), my guess is that the white men who marry Hispanic or black women are probably not up-selected and may even be slightly down-selected. But we need more granular data for making that determination with greater certainty.

    Conversely, the white women who marry out seem to be marrying down…unless it’s an Asian guy.

    My guess is what’s going on is the Asian-white couples (either direction) are selected for being in the UMC that’s not supposed to care about race.

    What’s going on is assortative marriage, in terms of income, education attainment, and social status. I met my wife in college, for example.

  389. @Jack D
    @Colin Wright

    Thank God that the Men of Unz never do this. Whenever HIAS is condemned, they are always careful to also condemn Lutheran Charities and Catholic Charities. When a book that they don't like is authored by a Jew and a Christian they equally condemn "our Jewish verbalist overlords" and "our Christian verbalist overlords".

    Oh no, wait, they don't. The comments here are filled with blood libels against Jews that would make Goebbels blush and assign Jews 100% blame for everything that they think is wrong with our society. Did you know that Jews really DO use the blood of Christian children to make matzo? I would gladly accept that Jews (as a disproportionately elite high IQ minority) deserve 20 or 25% blame for some of our societal ills just like they deserve 20 or 25% credit for postwar American scientific accomplishments, but the Men of Unz blame them 100%.

    I don't think you need any extra condemnation of Jews from me - I think others are handling that POV more than adequately here, including you. But I guess having the Unz antisemitism meter at 10 is not good enough for you. You want it turned up to 11.

    Replies: @Colin Wright, @Colin Wright, @Colin Wright

    ‘Thank God that the Men of Unz never do this…’

    …and I note that you still evade the issue. Why is that, Jack? What is so awkward about the point I originally raised?

  390. @Colin Wright
    @Jack D


    '...But I guess having the Unz antisemitism meter at 10 is not good enough for you. You want it turned up to 11.'
     
    But however did that meter get turned up?

    I think you're reversing cause and effect here. I was genuinely, impeccably non-antisemitic for the first forty years of my life -- really. Depending on how one counted, a good twenty to thirty percent of the people I grew up with were Jewish -- but Jewishness just wasn't a significant aspect of someone's identity. I'm not really sure, since I wasn't counting at the time. Looking back, I can see that he was Jewish, and she was Jewish, and halachically, he would have been Jewish, but back then, it just didn't matter much. At most, it was like being a vegetarian, or a Lutheran -- or having detached earlobes. 'Oh. Gee -- that's dull. What were we talking about?'

    Then I started noticing Israel's crimes -- and well, things expanded from there. As of about 2010, it was already 'Jews would be alright, if only I could forget about Israel.' But that isn't the case, is it? There's so much more...

    And here we are. But it wasn't my idea. Nor were they my actions that led us to this point.

    So why don't you account for our anti-semitism? You began it. After all, I'm not anti-Mormon, or anti-Pole, or anti-Chinese, or anti-Hispanic. So why am I anti-semitic?

    Replies: @Wielgus, @William Badwhite

    As I have mentioned before, I was pro-Israeli, even vocally so, until Sabra and Chatila in 1982. The methodology was a little too familiar…

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    @Wielgus


    As I have mentioned before, I was pro-Israeli, even vocally so, until Sabra and Chatila in 1982. The methodology was a little too familiar…
     
    Both parties even recruited fellow travelers to do the actual killing for them. The Germans had their Trawniki men, the Jews their Lebanese Phalangists.
  391. @Colin Wright
    @Jack D


    '(And this is putting aside the loss of their high IQ Jewish population...'
     
    ...and look at how Ukrainian civilization flowered under the Jews.

    Replies: @Wielgus

    Also note the barely-concealed assumption that Slavic Gentiles are stupid. Of course the Nazis too thought in terms of the Slavic Untermensch

    • Agree: Colin Wright
  392. @Colin Wright
    @William Badwhite


    '...People object to Jack because of his pervasive dishonesty...'
     
    The exasperating thing is that he's only noticeably dishonest when it comes to Jews and Israel.

    Keep him away from that, and he's okay...not great, but okay.

    The inference is that Jack would be alright -- if only he forgot about being a Jew. It's his Judaism that is the problem.

    We know that there is good within you, Jack...

    Replies: @William Badwhite

    The exasperating thing is that he’s only noticeably dishonest when it comes to Jews and Israel.

    And Russia. His thousands and thousands of Russia/Ukraine posts show the same pervasive dishonesty. I’d guess Jack thinks of himself as highly intelligent, however his “argument” style is highly emotional and based on a number of set views that no amount of evidence will move him off of. He is not really arguing, so much as just spewing his views.

    Keep him away from that, and he’s okay…not great, but okay.

    Even that is mostly non-attributed regurgitation of stuff from elsewhere.

    We know that there is good within you, Jack…

    Maybe in other walks of life, but not here. If the purpose of the comments section is to advance arguments and generally improve the quality of the site, he is a zero. To start, Yack D does not read and digest what other commenters write. He scans it, rephrases it into something wildly different from what the commenter wrote, then argues with what he came up with. That is, as Twinkie and Res and you and myself have pointed out many times, a form of LYING. But he keeps doing it. See the comment above the one I’m replying to, where you object to Jack’s “I bet you don’t. Jew killing is always good”. Nobody wrote that “Jew killing is always good…” except him. Jack the liar.

    So what is the purpose of arguing with someone that 1) won’t listen, 2) is incapable of self-reflection or admitting he’s wrong, 3) takes it for granted he can read people’s minds, and 4) lies as easily as he breaths? It’s like a dog chasing its tail.

    Those who comment here frequently have “tells”. Some consistently advance arguments and improve things (Alec Leamas , Arclight, yourself, Harry Baldwin, Mike Tre, SFG, Ben Tillman, and many others) and some advance arguments and improve things while at other times waste space (me, Twinkie 🙂 ) , while others have made it clear that they are here for some other purpose – HA to make sure nobody dissents from Approved Orthodoxy and to call people names, Corvirus to be an ankle-biting pest, Johnny Walker to change the subject, etc.

    Jack has made it abundantly clear that he can not or will not contribute. So add him to “Commenters to Ignore” and move on. I agree it is a tad annoying to look at a thread for new comments, see there are say, 12. Then go to the thread and see 12 grayed out “Jack D says, Jack D says, HA says, HA says, HA says, Jack D says (Johann Ricke agrees, Frau Katze agrees)”, Jack D says, HA says”.

    Some other commenter suggested Steve limit the number of posts an individual can have in a given thread. It is tiresome to see a Ukraine thread with 350 comments, and 170 are from Yack and Ha, saying the same thing over and over.

  393. @Colin Wright
    @Jack D


    '...But I guess having the Unz antisemitism meter at 10 is not good enough for you. You want it turned up to 11.'
     
    But however did that meter get turned up?

    I think you're reversing cause and effect here. I was genuinely, impeccably non-antisemitic for the first forty years of my life -- really. Depending on how one counted, a good twenty to thirty percent of the people I grew up with were Jewish -- but Jewishness just wasn't a significant aspect of someone's identity. I'm not really sure, since I wasn't counting at the time. Looking back, I can see that he was Jewish, and she was Jewish, and halachically, he would have been Jewish, but back then, it just didn't matter much. At most, it was like being a vegetarian, or a Lutheran -- or having detached earlobes. 'Oh. Gee -- that's dull. What were we talking about?'

    Then I started noticing Israel's crimes -- and well, things expanded from there. As of about 2010, it was already 'Jews would be alright, if only I could forget about Israel.' But that isn't the case, is it? There's so much more...

    And here we are. But it wasn't my idea. Nor were they my actions that led us to this point.

    So why don't you account for our anti-semitism? You began it. After all, I'm not anti-Mormon, or anti-Pole, or anti-Chinese, or anti-Hispanic. So why am I anti-semitic?

    Replies: @Wielgus, @William Badwhite

    So why don’t you account for our anti-semitism? You began it. After all, I’m not anti-Mormon, or anti-Pole, or anti-Chinese, or anti-Hispanic.

    Yack D is under the impression he can convince people to not be antisemitic (by which he means counter-semitic) through sheer volume of words. He doesn’t understand that what matters is what people perceive, not what Jack thinks. If people think someone is an asshole, it doesn’t really matter if he is or is not. Normal people would think “what am I doing that makes people think I’m an asshole”? Jack writes 1,000 words saying “here is why you’re wrong about me being an exceedingly wordy asshole”.

    Jews have a perception problem. People that “hate” Jews (by “hate” Jews mean “criticize”) have their reasons. Jews seem to believe that they can talk people out of criticizing hating them while not changing any aspect of their behavior. They share this trait with another demographic found at the other end of the socioeconomic spectrum. For an intelligent people, its a bizarre trait.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    @William Badwhite


    'Jews have a perception problem. People that “hate” Jews (by “hate” Jews mean “criticize”) have their reasons. Jews seem to believe that they can talk people out of criticizing hating them while not changing any aspect of their behavior. They share this trait with another demographic found at the other end of the socioeconomic spectrum. For an intelligent people, its a bizarre trait...'
     
    One strand here may be that Jews hate themselves. Witness the founding ideology of Israel; it was to create the anti-Jew: the physically strong, brave soldier-peasant, as opposed to the exploitive tavern keeper, the cowering Yeshiva student. The contempt and revulsion for traditional Jewishness among the early Zionists was very marked.

    ...and the best of the Jews either ignore their ethnicity as much as possible or criticize it: see the Coen Brothers' A Serious Man here.

    How many Jews actually want to be Jews? I mean, sure it's nice to feel intellectually superior and all -- but wouldn't most rather take that and dump the Jewishness? In fact, don't many try to do just that? Witness this Cofnas figure that just came up in one of Sailer's posts. Nice enough guy -- but his schtick is definitely 'I'm brilliant' rather than 'I'm Jewish.'

    This is of course intangible, but it differs from, say, your average German Lutheran farmer, who was perfectly happy to move to South Dakota and keep on being a Lutheran farmer, or your average second- third-generation Mexican, who picks up an interest in American football and becomes more comfortable in English rather than Spanish -- but isn't really bothered by the fact that he's still Mexican.

    So if Jews do hate themselves, if the shetl is a source of shame for them rather than pride, how can they ever expect us to admire them? They don't admire themselves.

    Maybe the problem with Jews is that they are Jewish, and no one wants to be a Jew.

    Replies: @Jack D, @Wielgus

  394. And Russia. His thousands and thousands of Russia/Ukraine posts show the same pervasive dishonesty…

    Yeah — but that seems to tie back into his Jewish identity. The sheer malevolence is hard to explain otherwise.

  395. @William Badwhite
    @Colin Wright


    So why don’t you account for our anti-semitism? You began it. After all, I’m not anti-Mormon, or anti-Pole, or anti-Chinese, or anti-Hispanic.
     
    Yack D is under the impression he can convince people to not be antisemitic (by which he means counter-semitic) through sheer volume of words. He doesn't understand that what matters is what people perceive, not what Jack thinks. If people think someone is an asshole, it doesn't really matter if he is or is not. Normal people would think "what am I doing that makes people think I'm an asshole"? Jack writes 1,000 words saying "here is why you're wrong about me being an exceedingly wordy asshole".

    Jews have a perception problem. People that "hate" Jews (by "hate" Jews mean "criticize") have their reasons. Jews seem to believe that they can talk people out of criticizing hating them while not changing any aspect of their behavior. They share this trait with another demographic found at the other end of the socioeconomic spectrum. For an intelligent people, its a bizarre trait.

    Replies: @Colin Wright

    ‘Jews have a perception problem. People that “hate” Jews (by “hate” Jews mean “criticize”) have their reasons. Jews seem to believe that they can talk people out of criticizing hating them while not changing any aspect of their behavior. They share this trait with another demographic found at the other end of the socioeconomic spectrum. For an intelligent people, its a bizarre trait…’

    One strand here may be that Jews hate themselves. Witness the founding ideology of Israel; it was to create the anti-Jew: the physically strong, brave soldier-peasant, as opposed to the exploitive tavern keeper, the cowering Yeshiva student. The contempt and revulsion for traditional Jewishness among the early Zionists was very marked.

    …and the best of the Jews either ignore their ethnicity as much as possible or criticize it: see the Coen Brothers’ A Serious Man here.

    How many Jews actually want to be Jews? I mean, sure it’s nice to feel intellectually superior and all — but wouldn’t most rather take that and dump the Jewishness? In fact, don’t many try to do just that? Witness this Cofnas figure that just came up in one of Sailer’s posts. Nice enough guy — but his schtick is definitely ‘I’m brilliant’ rather than ‘I’m Jewish.’

    This is of course intangible, but it differs from, say, your average German Lutheran farmer, who was perfectly happy to move to South Dakota and keep on being a Lutheran farmer, or your average second- third-generation Mexican, who picks up an interest in American football and becomes more comfortable in English rather than Spanish — but isn’t really bothered by the fact that he’s still Mexican.

    So if Jews do hate themselves, if the shetl is a source of shame for them rather than pride, how can they ever expect us to admire them? They don’t admire themselves.

    Maybe the problem with Jews is that they are Jewish, and no one wants to be a Jew.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Colin Wright

    Spare us the psychoanalysis . If anyone needs psychoanalysis it is antisemites like you. Which is more likely - that every single Jew hates himself or that you hate Jews?

    Replies: @Colin Wright

    , @Wielgus
    @Colin Wright

    Ernst Pawel's biography of Kafka, The Nightmare Of Reason, assumes that Kafka was conflicted about being a Jew and suffered from a good deal of self-loathing. He notes his interest in Zionism but doubts that he would have overcome his neuroses even if he had made it to Palestine. At one point Pawel comments on something Kafka wrote, perhaps a letter rather than his published short stories and unfinished novels, and describes it as a Jew's inescapable need to destroy himself as well as his victim. Since Pawel was quite the Zionist (he was a German Jew, born in Breslau, who joined the OSS during WW2 and settled in the USA after the war) it was quite a startling admission. He could have just said, "Well, that's Kafka" but he obviously thought the neurosis went much wider.

  396. @Wielgus
    @Colin Wright

    As I have mentioned before, I was pro-Israeli, even vocally so, until Sabra and Chatila in 1982. The methodology was a little too familiar...

    Replies: @Colin Wright

    As I have mentioned before, I was pro-Israeli, even vocally so, until Sabra and Chatila in 1982. The methodology was a little too familiar…

    Both parties even recruited fellow travelers to do the actual killing for them. The Germans had their Trawniki men, the Jews their Lebanese Phalangists.

  397. @Colin Wright
    @William Badwhite


    'Jews have a perception problem. People that “hate” Jews (by “hate” Jews mean “criticize”) have their reasons. Jews seem to believe that they can talk people out of criticizing hating them while not changing any aspect of their behavior. They share this trait with another demographic found at the other end of the socioeconomic spectrum. For an intelligent people, its a bizarre trait...'
     
    One strand here may be that Jews hate themselves. Witness the founding ideology of Israel; it was to create the anti-Jew: the physically strong, brave soldier-peasant, as opposed to the exploitive tavern keeper, the cowering Yeshiva student. The contempt and revulsion for traditional Jewishness among the early Zionists was very marked.

    ...and the best of the Jews either ignore their ethnicity as much as possible or criticize it: see the Coen Brothers' A Serious Man here.

    How many Jews actually want to be Jews? I mean, sure it's nice to feel intellectually superior and all -- but wouldn't most rather take that and dump the Jewishness? In fact, don't many try to do just that? Witness this Cofnas figure that just came up in one of Sailer's posts. Nice enough guy -- but his schtick is definitely 'I'm brilliant' rather than 'I'm Jewish.'

    This is of course intangible, but it differs from, say, your average German Lutheran farmer, who was perfectly happy to move to South Dakota and keep on being a Lutheran farmer, or your average second- third-generation Mexican, who picks up an interest in American football and becomes more comfortable in English rather than Spanish -- but isn't really bothered by the fact that he's still Mexican.

    So if Jews do hate themselves, if the shetl is a source of shame for them rather than pride, how can they ever expect us to admire them? They don't admire themselves.

    Maybe the problem with Jews is that they are Jewish, and no one wants to be a Jew.

    Replies: @Jack D, @Wielgus

    Spare us the psychoanalysis . If anyone needs psychoanalysis it is antisemites like you. Which is more likely – that every single Jew hates himself or that you hate Jews?

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    @Jack D


    Which is more likely – that every single Jew hates himself or that you hate Jews?
     
    This isn't even an argument. It's merely a false choice. Either could be true; neither could be true. Both could be true.

    It's like if I challenged you: which is more likely? That you have an air fryer or that I have a leaf blower?

    As it happens, I don't have a leaf blower. Does that improve the chances that you have an air fryer?

  398. ‘Spare us the psychoanalysis . If anyone needs psychoanalysis it is antisemites like you. Which is more likely – that every single Jew hates himself or that you hate Jews?’

    I could tell you the answer to that — but you wouldn’t like it.

  399. @Colin Wright
    @William Badwhite


    'Jews have a perception problem. People that “hate” Jews (by “hate” Jews mean “criticize”) have their reasons. Jews seem to believe that they can talk people out of criticizing hating them while not changing any aspect of their behavior. They share this trait with another demographic found at the other end of the socioeconomic spectrum. For an intelligent people, its a bizarre trait...'
     
    One strand here may be that Jews hate themselves. Witness the founding ideology of Israel; it was to create the anti-Jew: the physically strong, brave soldier-peasant, as opposed to the exploitive tavern keeper, the cowering Yeshiva student. The contempt and revulsion for traditional Jewishness among the early Zionists was very marked.

    ...and the best of the Jews either ignore their ethnicity as much as possible or criticize it: see the Coen Brothers' A Serious Man here.

    How many Jews actually want to be Jews? I mean, sure it's nice to feel intellectually superior and all -- but wouldn't most rather take that and dump the Jewishness? In fact, don't many try to do just that? Witness this Cofnas figure that just came up in one of Sailer's posts. Nice enough guy -- but his schtick is definitely 'I'm brilliant' rather than 'I'm Jewish.'

    This is of course intangible, but it differs from, say, your average German Lutheran farmer, who was perfectly happy to move to South Dakota and keep on being a Lutheran farmer, or your average second- third-generation Mexican, who picks up an interest in American football and becomes more comfortable in English rather than Spanish -- but isn't really bothered by the fact that he's still Mexican.

    So if Jews do hate themselves, if the shetl is a source of shame for them rather than pride, how can they ever expect us to admire them? They don't admire themselves.

    Maybe the problem with Jews is that they are Jewish, and no one wants to be a Jew.

    Replies: @Jack D, @Wielgus

    Ernst Pawel’s biography of Kafka, The Nightmare Of Reason, assumes that Kafka was conflicted about being a Jew and suffered from a good deal of self-loathing. He notes his interest in Zionism but doubts that he would have overcome his neuroses even if he had made it to Palestine. At one point Pawel comments on something Kafka wrote, perhaps a letter rather than his published short stories and unfinished novels, and describes it as a Jew’s inescapable need to destroy himself as well as his victim. Since Pawel was quite the Zionist (he was a German Jew, born in Breslau, who joined the OSS during WW2 and settled in the USA after the war) it was quite a startling admission. He could have just said, “Well, that’s Kafka” but he obviously thought the neurosis went much wider.

    • Thanks: Colin Wright
  400. @Jack D
    @deep anonymous


    our (((verbalist overclass))).
     
    Tom Schaller is of German and Italian descent. Not a drop of Jewish blood in him.

    The Men of Unz have special glasses - when a Jew and a Gentile write or do something that they don't like, they see (and condemn) only the Jew. Waldman somehow implicates all Jews but Schaller speaks only for himself and does not implicate Germans or Christians or anybody.

    Replies: @Colin Wright

    ‘…The Men of Unz have special glasses – when a Jew and a Gentile write or do something that they don’t like, they see (and condemn) only the Jew…’

    I’m afraid the truth is almost tediously the reverse. Often, I read something discussing some modern horror: gender ‘affirmation’ for minors, the subversion of the 2020 election, Black Bullshit matters.

    Sometimes, I have the energy to look up the names mentioned in the article as advocating whatever. Conservatively, three out of every four will turn out to be Jews. One out of every four could be explained away — more energy, a higher IQ, tilted towards verbal skills, blah blah blah. I wouldn’t read too much into one out of four. Even if that would be over-representation by an entire order of magnitude…

    But three out of four? We can’t pretend everything’s just fine. It’s not.

    I would like to not be antisemitic. I would like to be twenty five. However, reality keeps frustrating these preferences.

    It’s not me, Jack. It’s you.

  401. @Jack D
    @Colin Wright

    Thank God that the Men of Unz never do this. Whenever HIAS is condemned, they are always careful to also condemn Lutheran Charities and Catholic Charities. When a book that they don't like is authored by a Jew and a Christian they equally condemn "our Jewish verbalist overlords" and "our Christian verbalist overlords".

    Oh no, wait, they don't. The comments here are filled with blood libels against Jews that would make Goebbels blush and assign Jews 100% blame for everything that they think is wrong with our society. Did you know that Jews really DO use the blood of Christian children to make matzo? I would gladly accept that Jews (as a disproportionately elite high IQ minority) deserve 20 or 25% blame for some of our societal ills just like they deserve 20 or 25% credit for postwar American scientific accomplishments, but the Men of Unz blame them 100%.

    I don't think you need any extra condemnation of Jews from me - I think others are handling that POV more than adequately here, including you. But I guess having the Unz antisemitism meter at 10 is not good enough for you. You want it turned up to 11.

    Replies: @Colin Wright, @Colin Wright, @Colin Wright

    ‘Thank God that the Men of Unz never do this. Whenever HIAS is condemned, they are always careful to also condemn Lutheran Charities and Catholic Charities…’

    Give credit where credit is due. I think you actually have a point here.

    For a while there, when they seemed to be making a serious effort to dump Africans into our nice, white town, you would see these little convoys of obviously fresh-off-the-plane Africans (look for no socks and pajama bottoms for trousers) being shepherded around the local supermarket by virtuous-looking white women. ‘This is how we get food in America…’

    Anyway, I’ll bet on the women being Christians from some progressive denomination, being all virtuous and shit, not Jews.

    …but as I’ve argued with others, Jack, it’s a matter of proportion. There’s a balance: the urge to sympathize versus the need to preserve a functioning society. That’s always been there: we regulated railroads all by ourselves, without your help. Teddy Roosevelt had Booker T. Washington to dinner in the White House. We started actually trying to help the Indians.

    No one — or at least not I — says that we would or even should have some pre-modern, hierarchical paradise absent Jews. But perhaps we would have stopped somewhere short of open borders and mutilating children and encouraging blacks to run amok and…

    If it weren’t for Jews. Look at where you all push down on the scale, and to what effect.

    Indeed, picture society as a giant balance scale, with all of us scattered along the beam at various points. There’s me, pushing down here, and that benighted Corvinus pushing down there, and some of our real loonies, all the way over there…

    And here comes Jack, weighing four hundred pounds, and sits down right at one end. The scale tilts, and he says ‘who, me? You’re just being antisemitic.’

    I don’t even deny you your right to plop yourself down wherever you like. The Mormons do. Poles presumably do. It’s their prerogative.

    And it would be yours — if only you didn’t push the beam down so far. You’re having it all your own way — and it’s killing us.

  402. @Jack D
    @Colin Wright

    Spare us the psychoanalysis . If anyone needs psychoanalysis it is antisemites like you. Which is more likely - that every single Jew hates himself or that you hate Jews?

    Replies: @Colin Wright

    Which is more likely – that every single Jew hates himself or that you hate Jews?

    This isn’t even an argument. It’s merely a false choice. Either could be true; neither could be true. Both could be true.

    It’s like if I challenged you: which is more likely? That you have an air fryer or that I have a leaf blower?

    As it happens, I don’t have a leaf blower. Does that improve the chances that you have an air fryer?

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?