You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(31) |
May
(248) |
Jun
(151) |
Jul
(59) |
Aug
(67) |
Sep
(49) |
Oct
(151) |
Nov
(58) |
Dec
(112) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 |
Jan
(78) |
Feb
(77) |
Mar
(120) |
Apr
(172) |
May
(208) |
Jun
(88) |
Jul
(86) |
Aug
(171) |
Sep
(129) |
Oct
(40) |
Nov
(60) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(82) |
Feb
(47) |
Mar
(21) |
Apr
(29) |
May
(177) |
Jun
(90) |
Jul
(56) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(137) |
Oct
(302) |
Nov
(322) |
Dec
(24) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(142) |
Mar
(310) |
Apr
(475) |
May
(54) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(61) |
Aug
(159) |
Sep
(75) |
Oct
(97) |
Nov
(63) |
Dec
(97) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(72) |
Feb
(98) |
Mar
(61) |
Apr
(24) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(54) |
Jul
(143) |
Aug
(120) |
Sep
(147) |
Oct
(172) |
Nov
(108) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(55) |
Feb
(80) |
Mar
(84) |
Apr
(99) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(22) |
Jul
(37) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(61) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(29) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(30) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(63) |
Oct
(62) |
Nov
(14) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(29) |
Sep
(188) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(12) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(36) |
Apr
(42) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(21) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(33) |
Sep
(22) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
(1) |
2
|
|
3
(3) |
4
(2) |
5
(1) |
6
(3) |
7
|
8
(2) |
9
|
|
10
(12) |
11
(6) |
12
(3) |
13
(3) |
14
(2) |
15
(5) |
16
|
|
17
(1) |
18
(5) |
19
(2) |
20
(16) |
21
(4) |
22
(6) |
23
(8) |
|
24
(1) |
25
(8) |
26
(18) |
27
(10) |
28
(7) |
29
|
30
(8) |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-09-30 17:03:36
|
Bugs item #1568397, was opened at 2006-09-30 10:03 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1568397&group_id=41586 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Core - Core Group: XOOPS 2.0.10 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: <Default> Initial Comment: You have a very nice site <a href="http://linkook.com/6v">buy phentermine</a> http://linkook.com/6v [url=http://linkook.com/6v]buy phentermine[/url] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1568397&group_id=41586 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-09-28 02:20:15
|
Bugs item #1560015, was opened at 2006-09-16 22:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sf-robot You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1560015&group_id=41586 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Core - Core Group: XOOPS 2.0.x >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Editor adds html tags even when disable html is selected Initial Comment: Editor adds html tags around hyperlinks when disable html is selected. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: SourceForge Robot (sf-robot) Date: 2006-09-27 19:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1312539 This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter did not respond within 7 days (the time period specified by the administrator of this Tracker). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skalpa Keo (skalpa) Date: 2006-09-20 12:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=882380 Please Read the Bug Reporting Procedures before of post. Check/Search the XOOPS Forums, FAQ and Wiki for your problem or similar reported bug Make sure the problem IS reproduce-able (try to make it happen at least three times) Report bugs ONLY, no feature requests. Use the forums for this Be very clear in your report as to what the symptom is, the error code reported and module(s) affected and how to reproduce the error Chose the proper "Category" and "Group" when adding a report to the Tracker Please report your PHP environment (i.e. Apache/PHP versions, whether register_globals is ON or OFF, OS, etc...) Please use English when reporting ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1560015&group_id=41586 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-09-27 08:38:38
|
Feature Requests item #1566211, was opened at 2006-09-27 10:38 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430843&aid=1566211&group_id=41586 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Core Group: XOOPS 2.x Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Xoops_Gold (xoops_gold) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: NO ACCESS in regards to directories Initial Comment: Hallo! Currently there are many index.html with zero bytes. Fine. How about having a Forbidd routine with respect to system directories generating straight from the system known directories? This would therefore: create gerater security. allow admins to stop uploads into module directories. backups would be sensible, like one does not need to backup module/xcgal/albums/userpics but only uploads, etc. changing user permissions would be easy to maintain. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430843&aid=1566211&group_id=41586 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-09-27 08:25:01
|
Feature Requests item #1566207, was opened at 2006-09-27 10:24 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by xoops_gold You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430843&aid=1566207&group_id=41586 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. >Category: Core >Group: XOOPS 2.x Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Xoops_Gold (xoops_gold) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: USERID and APACHEID Conflicts Initial Comment: Hallo Skalpa! I address to you as I know that you are on the final versions before release. During the uploads with xcGal in to user albums, I noticed that when a user creates an album the first time, the directory is created under the general ApacheID of the server. However, all the Xoops php scripts have the AccountID ownership. The directories created also has the AccountID ownership. The data or files, gif/jpg stored in those directories have the ApacheID ownership! This is really a conflict. The scripts are owned by the account, they create apacheID in ownerships! This is also a chaos!!! Hence if there is a general class that the Xoops main CORE calls for thos functions and does not allow any other module to do other than this, would be the best solution. I suggest that: The scripts should check the Ownership of the scripts itself and then create the respective ownerships of sub-directores if possible. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430843&aid=1566207&group_id=41586 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-09-27 08:24:27
|
Feature Requests item #1566207, was opened at 2006-09-27 10:24 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430843&aid=1566207&group_id=41586 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Xoops_Gold (xoops_gold) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: USERID and APACHEID Conflicts Initial Comment: Hallo Skalpa! I address to you as I know that you are on the final versions before release. During the uploads with xcGal in to user albums, I noticed that when a user creates an album the first time, the directory is created under the general ApacheID of the server. However, all the Xoops php scripts have the AccountID ownership. The directories created also has the AccountID ownership. The data or files, gif/jpg stored in those directories have the ApacheID ownership! This is really a conflict. The scripts are owned by the account, they create apacheID in ownerships! This is also a chaos!!! Hence if there is a general class that the Xoops main CORE calls for thos functions and does not allow any other module to do other than this, would be the best solution. I suggest that: The scripts should check the Ownership of the scripts itself and then create the respective ownerships of sub-directores if possible. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430843&aid=1566207&group_id=41586 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-09-27 08:10:12
|
Feature Requests item #1565723, was opened at 2006-09-26 15:16 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xoops_gold You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430843&aid=1565723&group_id=41586 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Administration Group: XOOPS 2.0.x Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: wf-david (davidledbury2) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Search by group - findusers Initial Comment: We could do with expanding "findusers" to allow searching by user rank as well.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Xoops_Gold (xoops_gold) Date: 2006-09-27 10:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1329834 I find this area to be totally restrictive. The best is to have switches in each respective fields. Those switches could create a dynamic forms and allow sreaches. Hence the search function could be clubbed with general classes like, if a fieldset is text, then the possible search function to be applied are like Begining, Contains, End, etc. Hence the quality of fields and erspectible searches could be called from the classes. I myself had to do some extra php Programming to generate forms for searching other field values. By having a default form for search function of "find users" it restricts the seraches drastically. If a user or admin needs to require custom fields, then there should be also a way to search exactly those fields. Hence having a default search routines does not help admins thos require custom fields. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430843&aid=1565723&group_id=41586 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-09-27 08:05:13
|
Feature Requests item #1566197, was opened at 2006-09-27 10:05 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430843&aid=1566197&group_id=41586 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Core Group: XOOPS 2.x Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Xoops_Gold (xoops_gold) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: UPLOAD Hook for modules from the CORE Initial Comment: Hallo! I find it terrible that module developers use different methods of saving files in different directories other than Uploads directory, for instance xcGal and other modules. It would be the best to have restrictions through the core for modules to forbib or prohibit uploading in any other directory other than system allowed directories like uploads. This can only be done through the Core. This may also help developing a unified system of protecting uploads directory with .htaccess, if needed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430843&aid=1566197&group_id=41586 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-09-26 22:40:52
|
Patches item #1566040, was opened at 2006-09-27 06:40 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430842&aid=1566040&group_id=41586 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: XOOPS 2.0.x Group: Patches Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: plabosiris (plabosiris) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Counter Initial Comment: Working copy of Counter for XOOPS 2.0.15 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430842&aid=1566040&group_id=41586 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-09-26 14:51:19
|
Bugs item #1556674, was opened at 2006-09-11 23:50 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by skalpa You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1556674&group_id=41586 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: allnewtome (allnewtome) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: After ’ ‘ “ ” - or … all further characters ignored Initial Comment: When I input text with one of the 'problem' characters (see below), all characters after (and including) the first 'problem' character are ignored completely. When I go to edit the inputted text, it is as if I had only entered the characters up to the first 'problem' character. This affects the following modules (at least): smartsection 2.1 RC 2 cbb 3.05 The problem characters are (at least): ’ ‘ i.e. single curly quotation marks “ ” i.e. double curly quotation marks - i.e. long dash £ i.e. pound sign, obviously! … i.e. the ... (elipsis?) I have no problems when I replace these characters with ' ' " " - £ ... respectively. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skalpa Keo (skalpa) Date: 2006-09-26 16:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=882380 Please Read the Bug Reporting Procedures before of post. Check/Search the XOOPS Forums, FAQ and Wiki for your problem or similar reported bug Make sure the problem IS reproduce-able (try to make it happen at least three times) Report bugs ONLY, no feature requests. Use the forums for this Be very clear in your report as to what the symptom is, the error code reported and module(s) affected and how to reproduce the error Chose the proper "Category" and "Group" when adding a report to the Tracker Please report your PHP environment (i.e. Apache/PHP versions, whether register_globals is ON or OFF, OS, etc...) Please use English when reporting ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1556674&group_id=41586 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-09-26 13:49:42
|
Bugs item #1565746, was opened at 2006-09-26 06:49 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1565746&group_id=41586 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Core - install/upgrade Group: XOOPS 2.0.x Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Does not accept mysql passwords with $ in them Initial Comment: When entering a password with a $ for the mysql-server, the password gets cut before the $. So in the end, in mainfile.php the constant XOOPS_DB_PASS gets mangeled. For example, I did enter "xoops$8" (without quotes), at a later stage it wrote "written XOOPS_DB_PASS" but when settung up the database it could not connect. Inside mainfile.php I found define('XOOPS_DB_PASS', 'xoops'); ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1565746&group_id=41586 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-09-26 13:16:43
|
Feature Requests item #1565723, was opened at 2006-09-26 13:16 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430843&aid=1565723&group_id=41586 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Administration Group: XOOPS 2.0.x Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: wf-david (davidledbury2) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Search by group - findusers Initial Comment: We could do with expanding "findusers" to allow searching by user rank as well.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430843&aid=1565723&group_id=41586 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-09-26 04:30:58
|
Patches item #1565494, was opened at 2006-09-26 12:30 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430842&aid=1565494&group_id=41586 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: XOOPS 2.0.x Group: Patches Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: plabosiris (plabosiris) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Quizz 2.0 Initial Comment: I have managed to modify the files so that it is working properly in XOOPS 2.0.15, PHP 5.16, MySQL 5.0 Please let me know if it works well. I will amend it again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430842&aid=1565494&group_id=41586 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-09-26 01:51:01
|
Bugs item #1538291, was opened at 2006-08-10 22:05 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by skalpa You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1538291&group_id=41586 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Core - Core Group: XOOPS 2.0.x Status: Pending Resolution: Accepted Priority: 7 Submitted By: AlienHand (alienhand77) Assigned to: Skalpa Keo (skalpa) >Summary: Mailer Return-Path header is not set correctly Initial Comment: Hi. Using xoops 2.0.14 and up to date modules. I'm having trouble getting email notifications when adding something in different modules. All the users are set to recive email notification and they all checked the global/category/whatever notification inside every module. But, the users ain't getting any email notification no matter witch module I add something in. They do get PM if notification is set to PM - but it's set to recive email but not getting any. Anyone with this problem? Regards! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skalpa Keo (skalpa) Date: 2006-09-26 03:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=882380 K, it seems that phpmailer uses the content of its "Sender" property to set the Return-Path header, and as the XOOPS mailer/multimailer never assigns anything to this property, the header will be set to the default defined in php.ini. I made a fix for you to try... please tell me if that fixes your problems (if headers get set correctly, and if the mails go through). I tried by purposely misconfiguring my local sendmail config and the patch worked in that case, but I'd like to get more feedback, just to be sure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Daigoro (fsteffdaigoro) Date: 2006-09-03 13:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1588857 Hi skalpa & phppp, I added this bug https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1550834&group_id=41586&atid=430840 to the tracker the other day. The reason I made a new bug-description, is that - as far as I can see - the problem isn't limited to notifications, but actually affects the entire email system. -- Daigoro ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: AlienHand (alienhand77) Date: 2006-08-29 00:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1573146 I've been doing some further testing of the problems with sending notification (and other) emails expierenced by Alienhand and many others of later versions of Xoops. I've tested four systems: xoops 2.0.? : xoops.org xoops 2.0.6 : djvf.dk xoops 2.0.14: tegneserielogen.dk xoops 2.0.14: mathecon.dk Both xoops.org and djvf.dk uses phpmailer 1.65, and the others uses phpmailer 1.73. (As stated in the X-Mailer: mail header). The error I've noticed has to do with the headers of the send email. (More details further down). I found that the error isn't present on neither xoops.org nor djvf.dk, but the other two sites are both showing signs of the error. And one is seriously affected by it. Since djvf.dk and tegneserielogen.dk is both running on the same server, I've concentrated on that one to try to do some crude debugging. I simply tried to exchange the 1.65 and the 1.73 version of phpmailer to see if the error would move. Nothing happend. Then I also tried to exchange the xoopsmultimailer, but again the error persisted. So now I'm wondering where else the difference can be hidden. Perhaps the notification system, but it's harder for me to trace. Well, it's time to go into some more details about the error, and why it's working for some and not for others. To help, I've extracted some header information from notification emails send from the four systems: (Slightly edited, to prevent spam) Quote: djvf.dk: Delivered-To: fs...@gx... Return-Path: <fs...@gx...> To: fs...@gx... From: =?iso-8859-1?B<blahblah>?W2RaF0=?= <fs...@gx...> X-Mailer: phpmailer [version 1.65] X-Mailer: PHP/4.4.2 xoops.org Delivered-To: fs...@gx... Return-Path: <ap...@ww...> To: fs...@gx... From: no...@xo... X-Mailer: phpmailer [version 1.65] X-Mailer: PHP/4.4.2 tegneserielogen.dk: Delivered-To: fs...@gx... Return-Path: <pos...@te...> X-Authentication-Warning: webserv18.cliche.dk: nobody set sender to pos...@te... using -f From: fs...@gx... X-Mailer: PHPMailer [version 1.73] X-Mailer: PHP/4.4.2 Mathecon.dk Delivered-To: 329...@al... Return-Path: <pos...@ma...> To: sp...@al... From: ke...@ax... X-Mailer: PHPMailer [version 1.73] X-Mailer: PHP/4.4.4 Quote end: The important part to notice here, is the Return-Path. The general rule is that it should be equal to the sender, but as you can see, it's not the case in three out of four of the above. I won't try to explain the contents for xoops.org, but it appears to be working so never mind. tegneserielogen.dk and mathecon.dk on the other hand are quiet interesting. Where did the postmaster@ come from? I checked all files in the xoops instalation and the database, but it's not there. Then I started searching the web, only to find out that php's mail() function (in combination with sendmail) sometimes will insert this address if the return-path isn't allready filled by the script. Bummer. Why isn't the return-path allready set? (I still haven't found out.) The header problems in turn, gives some more serious problems. Of the two affected sites above, one is very lightly affected, and the other is very heavy affected. tegneserielogen.dk is very lightly affected. The only real proof that it's affected is the warning thats inserted into the emails headers. Mathecon.dk, on the other hand, is very heavy affected. Only one email every five (5) minutes is send. It turns out the web-provider has a very sensitive smap-filter active. If it senses a mail that appears like spam, it will disable/disrupt the scripts (in this case phpmailer) access to send emails for 5 minutes. One of the spam-triggers is if the return-path isn't filled with a vaild email-address, and since pos...@ma... does not exists, it's not valid. Well. Now we "just" need to find a fix for this. Please help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: AlienHand (alienhand77) Date: 2006-08-26 02:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1573146 I don't even have xoopsmailerlocal.php ... not in english nor danish folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Emmanuel Meunier (vetofish) Date: 2006-08-25 21:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1066987 Hi Sakalpa, It's me who speak in french, I have the same problem in french. I'am up to date (xoops 2.0.15) I'll test with english default language as soon as possible. Thx for your work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skalpa Keo (skalpa) Date: 2006-08-24 22:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=882380 Right now I can't reproduce the problem, so I don't think it's a general bug in the notifications system. There's one thing that comes to my mind anyway: it seems that you use a danish lang pack, and some lang packs contain a XoopsMailerLocal class that is used in some cases. However, due to an update of PHPMailer in 2.0.14 old versions of this class may not work anymore, and need to be updated too. So: - Does your install contain such a class (it should be in language/danish/xoopsmailerlocal.php) - If it does, could you please try to check if the problem persists after temporarily switching to "english" as your site language. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: AlienHand (alienhand77) Date: 2006-08-23 11:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1573146 In this forum we talk about the problem and try to fix it - but no luck http://www.xoops.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=52262&start=0#forumpost232505 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: AlienHand (alienhand77) Date: 2006-08-19 16:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1573146 Is it possible for you to write in english? Don't understand what you are writing at all... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2006-08-19 16:16 Message: Logged In: NO Bonjour, j'ai le même problème sur Xoops 2.0.14. La table notification est bien mise à jour dès qu'un utilisateur veut recevoir une notification, mais aucun email n'est envoyé (quand l'option email est sélectionné). La fonction email sur mon serveur est fonctionnelle. Je cherche tourjours d'où cela peut venir ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: AlienHand (alienhand77) Date: 2006-08-16 01:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1573146 Well - It doesn't work on 3 different serveres with different systems ... The xoops is configured to phpmail - could this be the problem? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: D.J. (phppp) Date: 2006-08-16 00:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1001493 Is email function set and working properly with your server? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1538291&group_id=41586 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-09-26 01:49:37
|
Bugs item #1538291, was opened at 2006-08-10 22:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by skalpa You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1538291&group_id=41586 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Core - Core Group: XOOPS 2.0.x >Status: Pending >Resolution: Accepted >Priority: 7 Submitted By: AlienHand (alienhand77) >Assigned to: Skalpa Keo (skalpa) Summary: no email notification Initial Comment: Hi. Using xoops 2.0.14 and up to date modules. I'm having trouble getting email notifications when adding something in different modules. All the users are set to recive email notification and they all checked the global/category/whatever notification inside every module. But, the users ain't getting any email notification no matter witch module I add something in. They do get PM if notification is set to PM - but it's set to recive email but not getting any. Anyone with this problem? Regards! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Skalpa Keo (skalpa) Date: 2006-09-26 03:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=882380 K, it seems that phpmailer uses the content of its "Sender" property to set the Return-Path header, and as the XOOPS mailer/multimailer never assigns anything to this property, the header will be set to the default defined in php.ini. I made a fix for you to try... please tell me if that fixes your problems (if headers get set correctly, and if the mails go through). I tried by purposely misconfiguring my local sendmail config and the patch worked in that case, but I'd like to get more feedback, just to be sure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Daigoro (fsteffdaigoro) Date: 2006-09-03 13:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1588857 Hi skalpa & phppp, I added this bug https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1550834&group_id=41586&atid=430840 to the tracker the other day. The reason I made a new bug-description, is that - as far as I can see - the problem isn't limited to notifications, but actually affects the entire email system. -- Daigoro ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: AlienHand (alienhand77) Date: 2006-08-29 00:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1573146 I've been doing some further testing of the problems with sending notification (and other) emails expierenced by Alienhand and many others of later versions of Xoops. I've tested four systems: xoops 2.0.? : xoops.org xoops 2.0.6 : djvf.dk xoops 2.0.14: tegneserielogen.dk xoops 2.0.14: mathecon.dk Both xoops.org and djvf.dk uses phpmailer 1.65, and the others uses phpmailer 1.73. (As stated in the X-Mailer: mail header). The error I've noticed has to do with the headers of the send email. (More details further down). I found that the error isn't present on neither xoops.org nor djvf.dk, but the other two sites are both showing signs of the error. And one is seriously affected by it. Since djvf.dk and tegneserielogen.dk is both running on the same server, I've concentrated on that one to try to do some crude debugging. I simply tried to exchange the 1.65 and the 1.73 version of phpmailer to see if the error would move. Nothing happend. Then I also tried to exchange the xoopsmultimailer, but again the error persisted. So now I'm wondering where else the difference can be hidden. Perhaps the notification system, but it's harder for me to trace. Well, it's time to go into some more details about the error, and why it's working for some and not for others. To help, I've extracted some header information from notification emails send from the four systems: (Slightly edited, to prevent spam) Quote: djvf.dk: Delivered-To: fs...@gx... Return-Path: <fs...@gx...> To: fs...@gx... From: =?iso-8859-1?B<blahblah>?W2RaF0=?= <fs...@gx...> X-Mailer: phpmailer [version 1.65] X-Mailer: PHP/4.4.2 xoops.org Delivered-To: fs...@gx... Return-Path: <ap...@ww...> To: fs...@gx... From: no...@xo... X-Mailer: phpmailer [version 1.65] X-Mailer: PHP/4.4.2 tegneserielogen.dk: Delivered-To: fs...@gx... Return-Path: <pos...@te...> X-Authentication-Warning: webserv18.cliche.dk: nobody set sender to pos...@te... using -f From: fs...@gx... X-Mailer: PHPMailer [version 1.73] X-Mailer: PHP/4.4.2 Mathecon.dk Delivered-To: 329...@al... Return-Path: <pos...@ma...> To: sp...@al... From: ke...@ax... X-Mailer: PHPMailer [version 1.73] X-Mailer: PHP/4.4.4 Quote end: The important part to notice here, is the Return-Path. The general rule is that it should be equal to the sender, but as you can see, it's not the case in three out of four of the above. I won't try to explain the contents for xoops.org, but it appears to be working so never mind. tegneserielogen.dk and mathecon.dk on the other hand are quiet interesting. Where did the postmaster@ come from? I checked all files in the xoops instalation and the database, but it's not there. Then I started searching the web, only to find out that php's mail() function (in combination with sendmail) sometimes will insert this address if the return-path isn't allready filled by the script. Bummer. Why isn't the return-path allready set? (I still haven't found out.) The header problems in turn, gives some more serious problems. Of the two affected sites above, one is very lightly affected, and the other is very heavy affected. tegneserielogen.dk is very lightly affected. The only real proof that it's affected is the warning thats inserted into the emails headers. Mathecon.dk, on the other hand, is very heavy affected. Only one email every five (5) minutes is send. It turns out the web-provider has a very sensitive smap-filter active. If it senses a mail that appears like spam, it will disable/disrupt the scripts (in this case phpmailer) access to send emails for 5 minutes. One of the spam-triggers is if the return-path isn't filled with a vaild email-address, and since pos...@ma... does not exists, it's not valid. Well. Now we "just" need to find a fix for this. Please help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: AlienHand (alienhand77) Date: 2006-08-26 02:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1573146 I don't even have xoopsmailerlocal.php ... not in english nor danish folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Emmanuel Meunier (vetofish) Date: 2006-08-25 21:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1066987 Hi Sakalpa, It's me who speak in french, I have the same problem in french. I'am up to date (xoops 2.0.15) I'll test with english default language as soon as possible. Thx for your work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skalpa Keo (skalpa) Date: 2006-08-24 22:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=882380 Right now I can't reproduce the problem, so I don't think it's a general bug in the notifications system. There's one thing that comes to my mind anyway: it seems that you use a danish lang pack, and some lang packs contain a XoopsMailerLocal class that is used in some cases. However, due to an update of PHPMailer in 2.0.14 old versions of this class may not work anymore, and need to be updated too. So: - Does your install contain such a class (it should be in language/danish/xoopsmailerlocal.php) - If it does, could you please try to check if the problem persists after temporarily switching to "english" as your site language. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: AlienHand (alienhand77) Date: 2006-08-23 11:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1573146 In this forum we talk about the problem and try to fix it - but no luck http://www.xoops.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=52262&start=0#forumpost232505 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: AlienHand (alienhand77) Date: 2006-08-19 16:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1573146 Is it possible for you to write in english? Don't understand what you are writing at all... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2006-08-19 16:16 Message: Logged In: NO Bonjour, j'ai le même problème sur Xoops 2.0.14. La table notification est bien mise à jour dès qu'un utilisateur veut recevoir une notification, mais aucun email n'est envoyé (quand l'option email est sélectionné). La fonction email sur mon serveur est fonctionnelle. Je cherche tourjours d'où cela peut venir ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: AlienHand (alienhand77) Date: 2006-08-16 01:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1573146 Well - It doesn't work on 3 different serveres with different systems ... The xoops is configured to phpmail - could this be the problem? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: D.J. (phppp) Date: 2006-08-16 00:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1001493 Is email function set and working properly with your server? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1538291&group_id=41586 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-09-26 01:32:41
|
Bugs item #1550834, was opened at 2006-09-02 01:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by skalpa You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1550834&group_id=41586 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Core - Core Group: XOOPS 2.0.x >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Daigoro (fsteffdaigoro) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Xoops 2.0.14+ mail problem. Initial Comment: Since installing 2.0.14, I and others have had some problems with sending mails and notifications. It seems different systems and different modules suffers different problems, and worst for people using PHP's mail(). In order to try to track it down, I've modified /class/mail/phpmailer/class.phpmailer.php to dump the calling arguments to mail() to the screen, instead of actually sending the mail. (The modified file is attached here, for you to use.) I first tried to send an email with piCal, and immediately found a duplicated "Return-Path:" entry in the header. The rest of the header is fine. The first "Return-Path" contained the correct return path, the second only an empty string. The empty string turned out to come from /class/xoopsmailer.php, and was fixed by commenting out line 257: // $this->headers[] = "Return-Path: ".$this->fromEmail; I've not been able to identify any side effects by removing that line. This also fixes the problem with many sendmails that automatically adds a Return-Path, with pos...@si... if a valid Return-Path is not already present. Then I continued my testing on both my site and a friends site and was soon overwhelmed by the many different omissions and errors that I found. Here's a quick start list: Sending "To users" from the xoops administration panel seems always to be encoded in utf-8, regardless of the encoding used by the site. The "From:" address is utf-8 encoded - it should be in standard text (8859-1). Also there's no "To:" address. (This naturally makes mail() fail - as reported by others) Sending notification when adding an event to ExtCal, the "From:" is correct, but again there's no "To:" at all, and the "Message-ID:" is empty. I tested several other modules, and there were always something that wasn't correct. It seems to me the xoopsmailer / xoopsmultimailer must be messed up somehow - but I lack an overview of the whole mailer system to be able to fully figure out whats wrong. Please let me know if I can help tracking this one down. -- Daigoro ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Skalpa Keo (skalpa) Date: 2006-09-26 03:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=882380 Please don't open another item for an already reported issue, and try to keep things organized (1 specific problem -> 1 report). The return-path issue is exactly the one discussed previously... and for the encoding: if your site is configured to use UTF-8 internally, then mails will be sent in UTF-8, that's not a bug. Now, if the encoding is really different from the one your site uses, then you may have spotted something but the first thing you can do to help is read the "bug reporting procedure" paragraph that is displayed in red letters before you post ;-). Thanks for helping us making xoops better. Marked as duplicate of #1538291 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1550834&group_id=41586 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-09-25 19:29:18
|
Bugs item #1446191, was opened at 2006-03-09 08:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rowd You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1446191&group_id=41586 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Core - install/upgrade Group: XOOPS 2.0.x >Status: Closed >Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: $xoops_iscommentadmin OR $xoops_isadmin Initial Comment: >From "2.0.13.2 full package", \modules\system\templates\system_comment.html at line 25, it wrote <{if $xoops_iscommentadmin == true}> However, I trace back from "upgrade patch" - xoops-2.0.7.x_to_2.0.9.2 - xoops-2.0.9.2-to-2.0.10 - xoops-2.0.10-to-2.0.12a - xoops-2.0.12a-to-2.0.13 - xoops-2.0.13-to-2.0.13.1 - xoops-2.0.13.1-to-2.0.13.2, there is no change on this file, but my site's old file wrote <{if $xoops_isadmin == true}> Should I missed something before, which one ($xoops_isadmin or $xoops_iscommentadmin ) is correct?? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: rowd (rowd) Date: 2006-09-25 21:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1095348 Please upgrade to the latest version (XOOPS 2.0.15). Use the files integrity script as documented in the release notes to check that the files are correct. Thanks for the report. :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1446191&group_id=41586 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-09-25 19:07:27
|
Bugs item #1565022, was opened at 2006-09-25 13:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rowd You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1565022&group_id=41586 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: wf-david (davidledbury2) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Backend.php problem Initial Comment: (Sorry I don't understand the actual problem, but the person reporting requested it to be submitted on his behalf) http://www.xoops.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=53378&post_id=237106#forumpost237106 Please read for more info... something to do with UTF8 encoding? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: rowd (rowd) Date: 2006-09-25 21:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1095348 Duplicate - see bug report #1193857. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: D.J. (phppp) Date: 2006-09-25 14:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1001493 Thanks It is not solely (if dependent on) DB collation or character set problem. I would suggest to re-consider the way of hanlding XOOPS rss/atom creation. It is too limited with no extensibility. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1565022&group_id=41586 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-09-25 12:42:45
|
Bugs item #1565022, was opened at 2006-09-25 07:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by phppp You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1565022&group_id=41586 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: wf-david (davidledbury2) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Backend.php problem Initial Comment: (Sorry I don't understand the actual problem, but the person reporting requested it to be submitted on his behalf) http://www.xoops.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=53378&post_id=237106#forumpost237106 Please read for more info... something to do with UTF8 encoding? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: D.J. (phppp) Date: 2006-09-25 08:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1001493 Thanks It is not solely (if dependent on) DB collation or character set problem. I would suggest to re-consider the way of hanlding XOOPS rss/atom creation. It is too limited with no extensibility. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1565022&group_id=41586 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-09-25 11:45:51
|
Bugs item #1565022, was opened at 2006-09-25 11:45 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1565022&group_id=41586 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: wf-david (davidledbury2) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Backend.php problem Initial Comment: (Sorry I don't understand the actual problem, but the person reporting requested it to be submitted on his behalf) http://www.xoops.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=53378&post_id=237106#forumpost237106 Please read for more info... something to do with UTF8 encoding? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1565022&group_id=41586 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-09-25 04:03:22
|
Bugs item #1564825, was opened at 2006-09-25 00:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by valcilon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1564825&group_id=41586 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Core - Core Group: XOOPS 2.0.x >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 9 Submitted By: Valcilon Silva (valcilon) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Users cannot register in xoops 2.0.15 Initial Comment: Forum topic: http://www.xoops.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=53677&forum=7&post_id=237076#forumpost237076 The username field is blocked in register.php forum. I try form.php from 2.0.15 branch without sucess. Valcilon AKA Valker ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Valcilon Silva (valcilon) Date: 2006-09-25 01:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583594 The problem was a max username size. I believe what this config was changed when i use downgrade script with 2.2.4 database. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Valcilon Silva (valcilon) Date: 2006-09-25 00:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583594 I try register.php from 2.0.16 cvs branch, what also do not solve this problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1564825&group_id=41586 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-09-25 03:39:48
|
Bugs item #1564825, was opened at 2006-09-25 00:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by valcilon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1564825&group_id=41586 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Core - Core Group: XOOPS 2.0.x Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 9 Submitted By: Valcilon Silva (valcilon) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Users cannot register in xoops 2.0.15 Initial Comment: Forum topic: http://www.xoops.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=53677&forum=7&post_id=237076#forumpost237076 The username field is blocked in register.php forum. I try form.php from 2.0.15 branch without sucess. Valcilon AKA Valker ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Valcilon Silva (valcilon) Date: 2006-09-25 00:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583594 I try register.php from 2.0.16 cvs branch, what also do not solve this problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1564825&group_id=41586 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-09-25 03:34:36
|
Bugs item #1564825, was opened at 2006-09-25 00:34 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1564825&group_id=41586 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Core - Core Group: XOOPS 2.0.x Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Valcilon Silva (valcilon) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Users cannot register in xoops 2.0.15 Initial Comment: Forum topic: http://www.xoops.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=53677&forum=7&post_id=237076#forumpost237076 The username field is blocked in register.php forum. I try form.php from 2.0.15 branch without sucess. Valcilon AKA Valker ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1564825&group_id=41586 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-09-23 17:06:43
|
Bugs item #1564058, was opened at 2006-09-23 15:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by skalpa You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1564058&group_id=41586 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Modules - Sections Group: XOOPS 2.0.10 >Status: Deleted Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: hgh Initial Comment: Site - very comprehensive and meticulous from all points of view, its good! Just excellent website, I'm sure! <a href='http://www.freepages.at/pizdecdance/fioricet.html' >fioricet</a> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Skalpa Keo (skalpa) Date: 2006-09-23 19:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=882380 spam ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1564058&group_id=41586 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-09-23 14:00:52
|
Feature Requests item #1563608, was opened at 2006-09-22 13:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gibaphp You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430843&aid=1563608&group_id=41586 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Core Group: XOOPS 2.0.x >Status: Open Resolution: Accepted Priority: 7 Submitted By: GibaPhp (gibaphp) Assigned to: Skalpa Keo (skalpa) Summary: Validations All Forms Xoops for Devs Initial Comment: All Forms xoops consistence and validations roles (javaScript and php) field in field. folder class/xoopsform This is implementation consistence for all forms xoops and liberty for developers chekin field in field for various validations javascript and formulary too :-) I very happy for one greate analysing code. Thanks my Friend, good Work for you. This is Work TheRpLima and implements GibaPhp :-) Giba :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: GibaPhp (gibaphp) Date: 2006-09-23 11:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1129857 I am ready your orientation abou duplicate code, yes, i agree and thanks for explanation. :-) About customization roles javascript and validations back-end php, i am review all implements and tests for no comprometed my forms with this new enfoque. I really example for include in unique class and herance, is good form, i agree and go to view it :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: GibaPhp (gibaphp) Date: 2006-09-23 11:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1129857 OK, I'll take care of this one personally. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skalpa Keo (skalpa) Date: 2006-09-22 22:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=882380 K Giba... I did it, you can have a look here: http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/xoops/XoopsCore/branches/2.0.x/2.0.16/htdocs/class/xoopsform/formelement.php?annotate=751 and tell me what you think. A few details for you: - The function I added has been put in XoopsFormElement, which is the base class used everywhere in XoopsForm. Because of this, you can use it in text,textarea,select, always :-) - The property I put is an array, so you can add several validation rules easily. Here is an example of use, to make a form element that can only contain letters and be at least 6 characters: $elt = new XoopsFormText( "Enter value", 'checkme' ); $elt->customValidationCode[] = "if (myform.elements.checkme.length < 6 ) return false;"; $elt->customValidationCode[] = "if ( !myform.elements.checkme.match(/^[a-z]*$/) ) return false;"; $form->addElement( $elt ); ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skalpa Keo (skalpa) Date: 2006-09-22 21:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=882380 You missed a point... The change I did in 2.0.15 does *exactly* this. The only difference is that you called the function for custom validation "getEspecValid", while I decided to call it "renderValidationJS". So there is no need to add the same thing 2 times. Now, the 2.0.15 code requires that people make a custom class, so I may make it a little easier, to allow people to do things like this: $elt = new XoopsFormText( "caption", "title", 50 ); $elt->customValidationCode = "<put JS code here>"; $form->addElement( $elt ); I'll do it and tell you... Just 2 comments anyway: - If you add something to a base class (here: XoopsFormElement) there is no need to put it again in all children classes (XoopsFormText, XoopsFormTextarea, etc...). This is actually what Object-Oriented programming and classes is about: you put "common" functionality in base classes, so you don't have to duplicate the same code everywhere. - When you need to add a property to an object (in your code: "especvalid") you don't have to make get/set functions (like getEspecValid/setEspecValid). You can let people access the property directly by doing: $elt->especvalid = "value". I know XOOPS is full of these ugly things everywhere, but this is very bad habits... The fact mistakes were done in the past does not mean we have to make them again and again. So please do not use this in your code, unless you really need to: your code will be easier to understand, and faster. :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430843&aid=1563608&group_id=41586 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-09-23 13:37:12
|
Bugs item #1564058, was opened at 2006-09-23 06:37 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1564058&group_id=41586 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Modules - Sections Group: XOOPS 2.0.10 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: hgh Initial Comment: Site - very comprehensive and meticulous from all points of view, its good! Just excellent website, I'm sure! <a href='http://www.freepages.at/pizdecdance/fioricet.html' >fioricet</a> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=430840&aid=1564058&group_id=41586 |