'Citizen Vigilante'
Search Text Case Sensitive Exact Words Include Comments
List of Bookmarks
A new film explicitly dedicated to the victims of the migrant invasion of Europe is all over social media. Variety and other publications are calling it immoral, but it’s finding an audience that is furious with what’s being done to the Continent. Is this the beginning of a new wave of right-wing cultural creation?
Subscribe to View From the Right on Bitchute here.
Find this podcast on X here.
Download this episode here.
(Republished from Renaissance Radio by permission of author or representative)
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
English
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Kevin DeAnna is the truth-teller par excellence.
There’s no truth too uncomfortable for him to divulge
No topic too hot to handle
No subject too taboo to broach
No reality to unpleasant for him to confront
A modern-day prophet whose words will resonate throughout the ages
The Solution to The Problem is not only applicable to Third World migrant invader criminals and cultural poisoners; domestic demon beasts, mostly Blacks, that stab up Whites…like the dreadlocked monster in Charlotte, NC and former Snakehead Karmelo, and its vile spawners in Texas.
The subject film, CITIZEN VIGILANTE, dealing with miscreant judges and bureaucrats is…
refreshing.
Unless its jews…
your a flaming idiot
People are starving for any movie depicting the current problems with multiculturalism in a way sympathetic to the victims and not the invaders–since the culture has been devoid of them. This is the only way a freaking Uwe Boll movie is becoming such a hit.
Speaking of idiots, while using only seven words you managed to misspell two of them, both very simple:
it’s, not its
You’re, not your
If you’re going to pretend to be a white man you’ll need to be able to use the white man’s English language correctly. Leave the gibberish to those who emerged from the jungle.
“👉 you’re 👈 a flaming idiot”
This is 4th grade stuff. I’m not calling you a “flaming idiot”, but if we want to hand our 🌿 Exquisite White Culture 🌿 down to “our posterity”, we must “mind our P’s and Q’s”.
People are starving for a media and Hollywood that doesn’t vilify them for being White and that doesn’t portray non-Whites, even illegals and other criminals, as innocent victims. However, considering Jews control the media and Hollywood, I would not hold my breath. And since most Whites are now conditioned to be punching bags, they are pretty much in acceptance mode.
That being said, there are many downsides to the film.
In fact, the protagonist is portrayed as a hypocritical anti-hero (drawing on classic vigilante tropes like those found in Taxi Driver) who visits prostitutes (the one he has sex with seems to be non-White), callously fires his staff of older personnel, and is basically a penny-pinching cold-hearted landlord with no compassion for renters or employees. He’s not charitable at all towards the local people except to avenge the raped girls.
It’s even his very own property that he allows to be used as a brothel.
He’s not a White nationalist but some kind of anti-government and anti-elitist anarchist. I guess that’s okay as long as he’s going after the right targets.
At one point, he even kills an innocent driver (most likely a European native) by driving in their lane and accelerating towards them at high speed in order to make them wreck out and just make a point, which is to demonstrate how people are rule-following conformists.
He also mows down an elite SWAT team in an over-the-top blood-and-gore scene (those are hardly the tactics that any competent SWAT team would use when approaching a barricaded suspect, especially one that is heavily armed, but that’s beside the point). I would agree with DeAnna that soldiers are really not the enemy and the protagonist does warn them that he doesn’t want to kill them but the scene is still disturbing.
The movie also shows European men attempting to drug some girls at a bar in order to rape them – the protagonist switches the drink so that the guys get drugged instead and warns the girls to leave. It portrays a mixed-race group of adolescents refusing to pay their bus fare and beating on an innocent kid.
While the ending scene is indeed epic (and probably the saving grace of the film), there’s much left to be desired. There was a lot of politically-correct nonsense that the director included just to be able to cover his ass and create a false moral equivalence among natives and migrants and thereby justify his final scene without coming across as a naked “bigot” or “far-right” extremist.
Honestly, I prefer Liam Neeson’s character in Taken over the protagonist in Citizen Vigilante. At least Liam Neeson’s character was bad-ass without having questionable morals. He was someone you could support and admire, and he was trying to save his daughter back as opposed to acting in the name of a vaguely anarchist ideology. The film also touched upon many of the same issues: organized migrant crime, sex trafficking, corrupt and treacherous government officials, etc.
We shouldn’t have to tolerate such demoralizing anti-hero type films to get our point across when the Left can brazenly create films that are simplistic black-and-white morality tales that portray Whites as unambiguously bad and the “coloreds” as down-to-earth goodie goodies.
Shouldn’t that be Ps and Qs?
P and Q are plural, not possessive, so apostrophes are not needed.
All the best
I watched Citizen Vigilante last night on BitChute.
As cinematic art, or even craftsmanship, it’s pretty much a dud. But no more so than most low-budget action films. However, that’s obviously not the point. Whether intended as a big time moneymaker or a sneer at migrant-welcoming governments and the movie industry (most likely both), it portrays the central character called Sanders as a rich American in an unnamed eastern European city (it was filmed in Zagreb, Croatia). He owns apartment buildings but his paramount interest is exacting revenge on migrants who commit violent crimes on the native-born population.
Inevitably, everybody is comparing Citizen Vigilante to the 1970s Death Wish movies. Judges and cops are soft on crime, this time committed by hoodlum invaders. Sanders, who owns an armory of varied pistols and automatic weapons, dishes out his idea of justice on the perps in various spectacular ways. An Interpol inspector who apparently borrows a SWAT legion from the local police is hot on his trail, but Sanders teaches them a lesson.
The plot ranges from unconvincing to nonsensical, with a numbingly crude soundtrack. However, as Sanders, Armie Hammer (whom I’ve never seen before) really inhabits his character. He has screen presence and possibly against your will he draws you in. Unfortunately, the only other major role, the Interpol dude, is played by a dull actor. Uwe Boll, both director and writer, flubs as the former. But as the latter he does infuse some shadings: a couple of scenes show Sanders to be an unlikeable fanatic under his avenging angel persona.
Citizen Vigilante has reportedly already been banned in Germany, and I expect 90 percent of reviewers will trash it similarly to Paulene Kael about Dirty Harry — “obviously just a genre movie, but this action genre has always had a fascist potential, and it has finally surfaced.” But public, if not critical, values have changed a lot since then. Tolerance for migrant crime is at rock bottom. It will be interesting to see whether Citizen Vigilante becomes a new causal factor, or just a symptom, of changing attitudes.
A good movie that many people overlook is “Law Abiding Citizen” where Gerard Butler (Clyde Shelton) whose family was murdered and was then abused by the system by a lazy “winner take all” vindictive prosecutor, Jamie Fox (Nick Rice) who came after Butler with a vengeance while cutting the main criminal a break and executing his accomplice.
I was rooting for Butler’s character, while at the same time decrying the innocents who perished in the movie as a result of his actions.
If I were the prosecutor, I would have refused to prosecute Shelton for the dismembered body found in his warehouse…
This movie effectively pointed out that an innocent man is the easiest person in the world to prosecute. Since the “system” didn’t work, Butler took true justice in to his own hands, not a bad thing.
My favorite phrase that Butler espoused was that he was going to “bring the whole diseased temple down” on prosecutor Nick Rice’s head.
The “whole diseased temple” that we are living under today is Washington D.C., Congress, the federal executive department, israel, zionism and judaism itself.
The “whole diseased temple” NEEDS to be brought down.
I don’t know why the libs are so upset about this film. It appears to have more than the requisite numbers of minorities in the cast to qualify for Oscar nominations!
What’s a Muslim’s favorite garden?
A kindergarten!
Armie Hammer (Jew) stars in more goyslop from Ewe Boll, regarded as the worst director now working. However, he does have his uses:
I’m sure we can expect nothing from him other than a cinematic equalent of Triumph of the Will, right?
Not more misdirection from the real causes, which are … Jews.
Comsume product, goy! Await new product!
Hello Eustace Tilley (not)
The online Merriam-Webster Dictionary seems willing to “sometimes” accept your use of the apostrophe as with the plural of letters like P’s and Q’s.
However, I hold my ground, and believe the use of the apostrophe in your application is unnecessary, and only serves to clutter simplicity.
Apostrophe, noun: a mark ‘ used to indicate the omission of letters or numerals, the possessive case (as in “John’s book”), or sometimes the plural of letters or numerals (as in “the 1960’s”).
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/apostrophe
All the best
On a global scale, there are very few people who are more censored and less sovereign than Germans and Austrians.
https://twitter.com/MartinSellner_/status/2069299581897015498
There are many good things that could be said about Kevin DeAnna, but “truth-teller par excellence” is not one of them.
You can rely on him to tell the truth about what the Pakistani rape gangs did to English girls, but not the truth about who let them in to England in the first place.
>Shouldn’t that be Ps and Qs?
No.
It’s a long-held convention that you use an apostrophe to form the plural of a single letter:
Apostrophes in Plurals
They give a specific example of why this rule/convention is useful:
There are two i’s in iridescent.
The plural “i’s” would read as the word “is” without the apostrophe.
The Merriam-Webster online dictionary has an entry for p’s and q’s.
In other cases, e.g. for numbers and acronyms, it’s generally agreed that there is more flexibility: SSN’s or SSNs, 1970’s or 1970s — it’s a matter of style or personal choice, sometimes of formal versus informal (colloquial) — to me both forms are acceptable.
Plurals of acronyms, letters, numbers — use an apostrophe or not?
I like the part where Hammer tells the lying father that he is most likely one of the wealthy evil people who made his country a hellhole and has merely escaped the dystopia he helped create, that actual refugees are still stuck in that hellhole, too poor to emigrate to a safe country. He exposed that the father and his family brought evil with them and are spreading it in the new country where they are preying on the civilized inhabitants and living quite comfortably.
What’s incongruous is that Hammer is cast as a (1) a multimillionaire, (2) a very capable ex-US Army soldier who actually learned weapons and fighting in the US Army – which is a stretch – and (3) capable of preparing to operate as a vigilante anticipating the actions of local police and Interpol. Soldiers today seldom even see their weapons which are kept locked away except during live fire exercises at the range.
The message is axiomatic but definitely suppressed in the Jew-owned and -controlled mass media.
Thanks for your comment! It gives me the opportunity to once more don my (self-awarded) robe as H.L Mencken Professor Emeritus of American Language, George Floyd International Memorial University.
Yes! It is 👉ALMOST ALWAYS THE CASE👈 that “apostrophe s” shall be used to indicate the possessive (Romans would have said the “genitive”) case: “John’s house”, “America’s birthday”, etc. or, colloquially, the shorthand form for “is”: “He’s [“He is”] a jolly good fellow”.
Catch-22: It seems to be agreed upon that, to prevent confusion, “apostrophe s” for a plural is helpful in such cases as this: “King Charles has a new Court Calligrapher who is still struggling to perfect his U’s”; “George Floyd International Memorial University only gives A’s to Black students so they won’t appear racist.”
🌿 I opened my Spaghetti-O’s®,
But ‘midst the sauce, I found no O’s.
I’d give my last apostrophe
For just one O in sauce to see.
And Tic-Tac-Toe I cannot play
Sans O’s or X’s: Woe the day!
Without an X, what use is life?
An Ex I’ll choose before a wife.🌿
Well said
The point of the film might just be for White People to finally wake-up, take-up arms and start to kill the invaders, rapists, murderers, bloodsuckers that the Jews use to flood our nations to destroy us.
Read that and see what is going on in Europe, it’s about time White People react and that the fear change sides.
I put the traitors who help the invaders and the politicians behind the invasion in the same bag as the vermin who terrorize our nations.
IT IS AN ORGANIZED AND PLANNED GENOCIDE, THEY ARE FLOODING OUR LANDS WITH ARMIES OF CRIMINALS, FEMALE BREEDERS AND SETTLERS TO REPLACE US AND EXTERMINATE US.
IT IS A WAR AND YOUR GOVERNMENT IS WAGING THIS WAR AGAINST YOU.
Brutal killing of French teen by migrant gang sparks national outrage (GRAPHIC FOOTAGE)
https://www.rt.com/news/642116-france-teenager-deadly-beating
The 21st Century is the Last Era of White People
https://paulcraigroberts.org/the-21st-century-is-the-last-era-of-white-people/
Even more than the hyphen, whose usage rules can drive even seasoned editors to fits of madness, the apostrophe is a banana peel on which most writers slip from time to time.
Let’s probe the Merriam-Webster explanation.
1. Omission: Fairly straightforward and easy to follow, except that word processing software can throw a kink in the line when the apostrophe for omission comes at the beginning of a word. If, for instance, you abbreviate the 1960s as the ’60s, the app thinks it’s a single quotation mark (mostly used in British style and US headlines). Where quotation marks are “curled,” they come out facing the wrong way, e.g., the ‘60s rather than the ’60s.
2. Possessive: Simple for singular possessive, but can be confusing for a plural possessive where the apostrophe comes a the end of a word. Thus, “voters’ will” (or is it voter’s will?), the “birds’ flight” (or “bird’s flight”)? And there’s disagreement even among the literate about what to do when a possessive word ends in s. Some think the form s-apostrophe-s (Jones’s) is awkward and reduce it to a simple s-apostrophe (Jones’), but others think the first version is clearer. I’m in the second camp.
3. Plurals: I have no explanation why, but some writers use an apostrophe to indicate a plural. P’s and Q’s, question’s and answer’s, etc.
Reader, if you have stuck with me this long, you are either a champion language tamer or trying to postpone something tougher. Either way, thanks.
A valid point, but that’s a special case where the apostrophe avoids reader misunderstanding. There’s nothing ambiguous about Ps and Qs and similar constructions.
Sorry to be a troublemaker, but the sentence above, while grammatical, is not ambiguity-proof.
Does the university only give A’s (no other grade) to black students, who are thus guaranteed always to receive an A?
Does the university only give A’s to black students, and no A’s to white students?
The antecedent of “they” is unclear. Who won’t appear racist, the university or the blacks?
I don’t see George Floyd International Memorial University as a collective noun, so “they” should be “its.” You wouldn’t write, “The Poison Ivy League are first among equals in discrimination against whites.”
Summing up, I would recast the sentence given as an example this way: “To avoid being seen as racist, George Floyd International Memorial University grades the work of black students only as A.”
Since it’s almost guaranteed that another commenter will accuse me (and probably you) of being a “grammar Nazi,” I offer in my defense that I’ve always had trouble with grammatical terminology. To use the correct word, I tried to remember what part of speech “they” is, and couldn’t. I’m usually pretty good at knowing how to construct a sentence, but not necessarily at explaining why.
Thou hast bested me, Sir, in grammatical fisticuffery. Kudos.
I plead “nolo contendere” to the grammatical misdemeanor of employing a plural pronoun (to wit: “they”) when a singular pronoun (to wit: “it”) would have been preferred.
I pray that none of the Board of Directors of G.F.I.M.U. reads TUR. If so, I am undone. My sole consolation, as always, is poetry:
🌿What we need is a Nuremberg II
To give all Grammar Nazis the screw.
To the Hangman of Doom
Send all those who say “whom”
Or write “thee” when they shoulda wrote “you”.🌿
Uwe Boll has mined the news for movies before.
After the 2008 crash, he made Assault on Wall Street, a cheapie about how Private Equity is running the country into the ground.
From what I hear, the Wall Street movie is better than this one. And Boll made it back in 2013, before Luigi popped the insurance mogul, making it more fun to watch than before. Because the main point the movie makes is: A security man’s wife is dying of cancer, exceeds her policy limit, and dies. So the security man, not illogically, shoots up the street. And kills the prick who makes policy limits like that possible.
Boll may be a hack. But he’s an honest hack. The end of Assault on Wall Street is a master class in making a memorable, utterly satisfying ending you honestly don’t see coming.
Billy Bob says, check it out.
Uhm …. no.
It portrays some adolescent scum who refused to pay the bus fare. He “preaches” to them about the consequences of their actions and one of them starts to pull a knife. That same white kid brandished the knife openly while getting off the bus.
I’ve only got about 20+ minutes into the film so far but it seems to be entertaining. It is definitely making the annals of history as one form of push back to the government insanity of importing the dregs of the turd-world.
CITIZEN AVENGER is now posted on X/Twitter for free.
Elon Musk wants it there for the places that are banning it. I’m beginning to like this trillionaire.
https://twitter.com/search?q=elon%20musk&src=recent_search_click
Just finished the movie. I thought it carried a lot of redeeming social value. Recommend that you watch it — it will become a part of the historical record in this very turbulent social and political period.
Paul Craig Roberts has great articles on the subject and usually well documented. The only problem is that he doesn’t allow comment son his articles.
Why?
https://paulcraigroberts.org/scandinavian-rapes-rival-britains-and-the-governments-also-cover-up-the-rapes-so-not-to-threaten-the-multicultural-policy/
There is a lot to add and to comment about what he exposes since years.
The main observation is that white people have brought and keep bringing their own genocide by their meek and compliant attitude, their guilt and lack of cojones (lack of balls).
The immigrant invaders must go, either on their two feet or in lying in planks.
Northern Irish have shown what to do and how to treat the scum who think white people are just defenseless easy prey.
In France, nobody moves when this happens, while thousands of immigrant invaders should be lynched in retaliation
https://paulcraigroberts.org/immigrant-invaders-continue-to-assert-power-through-violence-over-the-ethnic-french-people/
Burn the “asylum” centers, beat them, stab them, shoot them, destroy everything they own until they have no choice but to run for their lives back to their shitholes!
How do you do the plural of the letter s?
Apply the same treatment to our parasitic jews and those pulling the strings behind the scenes and we are in full agreement.
I find that those that can’t tolerate comments are simply not secure in their positions.
For example, Zerohedge allows comments most of the time and I frequently find the comments of more value than the article. On BS stories, many ZH commenters call out the truth. Sometimes tho, Zerohedge is clearly selling placement of garbage or propaganda stories. In those instances, they will not let the readers comment because the readers would call them out on the BS. ZH is not the source it once was.
If Roberts can’t deal with feedback, his work is something I don’t need to bother with.
Peak Stupidity‘s review of Citizen Vigilante has been posted.
The most timely movie EVER – Citizen Vigilante. You can watch the whole movie there, if you’d like.
I saw a short where the coward butchers an entire family because the son is a rapist. It was insanely racist, brutal and murderous-like an IDF training video. The only question is which Judeosatanist or Zionazi group paid for it. And the vicious approval of such hate-crazed barbarism just shows how thoroughly Judaised the West has become.
Thank you for this. Back a dozen years ago, I used to read all the ZH posts and comments. That commenting set was one of the very best. It’s not quite as good nowadays, but there are still plenty of real “gems”. The certain type of sarcasm they use is my favorite.
Anyway, regarding Paul Craig Roberts, I also see him as a great Constitutionalist Conservative. I can tell you what happened wrt the time he asked to have his comment section removed.
PCR had written 2 columns in favor of the Climate Calamity™ “Biggest con-job ever perpetrated on the World”. (Thank you, President Trump!). The comments underneath both eviscerated him for this stupidity, and I feel proud to have been a part of that. There was a little bit more involved with some commenter spoofing Mr. Roberts in the comments too. Either way, he’d had enough. That was when I quit reading his articles here.
My apology. Meant to strike LOL, as I thought your poetry amusing.
All the best
I read a review. I’ve only seen one clip, of the JEW Hammer shooting up an Arab Muslim family. This is jewish agitprop, throwing bones to their STUPID, gullible goy audience. I won’t waste time on the rest of it.
I am no fan of Muslims OR Arabs but this is a (badly) designed pressure valve. Whites are SICK of the Darkies and jews need Whites to fight their wars. Meanwhile the actor Hammer, who is White presenting, has a big old Hebrew Aleph on his tummy. So it’s A-OK to slaughter the perceived enemies of the jew, but if Whites do this for our own benefit, the ((( law)) will come down like a ton of bricks.
Roberts is OK, but he seems to always be playing “catch up” in his articles.
No thanks. I wouldn’t waste a second on that jewish TRASH. No wonder jews think the goyim are MORONS. It’s so EASY to trick them
Haven’t watched the film but it calls to mind the sordid tale of the dystopian movie Grey State about the establishment of a martial-law police state, but it’s production was disrupted permanently by the ‘murder-suicide’ of the filmmaker David Crowley, his wife Komel, and their 5 year old daughter Rani.
Curiously neither the film nor Mr. Crowley has a Wiki page despite the intense interest in this story by the conspiracy-minded, although a documentary about this story (A Grey State) by Werner Herzog, does. Haven’t watched that either although it’s curious why a towering legend such as Herzog would find the subject worthy of his time.
It’s also curious that Mr. Crowley who shares a famous surname we all know, is alleged to have
It’s always important for intelligence to leave behind explicit messaging on weapons & magazines used in alleged mass-casualty events, or fantastical blood-wall writing especially as the population becomes progressively less intelligent. There must be a special course on blood-wall messaging at Langley. Lesson one is likely “Don’t write in cursive.”
Demoralization.
The director, Uwe Boll, is a notorious hackmeister, on the Ed Wood-level. Several of his movies are considered amongst the worst ever made. He stopped making films for a while when the criticism got so bad his name became a punchline (Boll, a pugnacious sort, challenged various critics to actual MMA fights, none of whom took him up on the offers). A German national, Boll made his bones directing 2000s video game adaptations which were poorly received. His films are watched ironically.
So I have no doubt, not having seen it yet, that this is a badly-made film.
Interestingly, Boll is quite intelligent. He allegedly holds a PhD in literature, and when took a break from making films became a successful restaurateur in Canada. And he has bragged that he basically became a director of many films despite bad reviews and bad box office returns because he shrewdly exploited a loophole in the German tax code that had the German government paying for half of every film he made, thus halving the costs normally associated with film making.
So its interesting that he returns to filmmaking with something so bold as this. He clearly wanted to prick the zeitgest and has done so so well he has half of the world’s right-wingers cheering him on. Imagine if Ed Wood had directed Death Wish and it had suddenly revived his name and career among the Silent Majority and you can see what’s happening to Boll. Let’s see if he sustains it, and if others pick up the trail.
The film showed dealing with corrupt judges in a novel way. I note that it did not show dealing with the corrupt politicians. Shame that.
In that scene, the son and four other pieces-of-shit, pulled a woman into the bushes and raped her. The daughter witnessed it and not only failed to stop it, she went on her social media page and essentially said the victim deserved it because of the way she dressed. So, the avenger whacked the gang rapers and the daughter. The parents he wacked because they instilled these values into these children and were essentially garbage (the wrong people came here in your case).
Horror stories have been popping up at regular intervals since the start of replacement migration with the third world. This film gives voice to to the indigenous harmed during this government crime spree. Although others have been shining a light on this immigration disaster, this vid is the first organized resistance that just might gain traction. It’s long overdue. It’s way past time for the sheep to wake up and take karate lessons. If this film is part of the awakening process — so be it. Yes, it difficult to watch. Film of the original rapes and murders would be equally difficult to watch. Get over it.
I’ve heard that one of his films, Tunnel Rats, about the Vietnam War, is apparently good. I haven’t checked it out myself.
Paul Craig Roberts attracts an unwarranted level of vitriol and defamation and I believe he stopped allowing comments when the COVID cult were pushing their lies and pushing the poisonous COVID DEATH VAX.
In this genre, “Flawless”, with Demi Moore and Michel Caine, is a superbly done and well acted film. You won’t even recognize Moore.
In any event, Michael Caine plays a long term employee of a major British bank in which he is a night-shift janitor.
Demi Moore plays a disillusioned manger who sees her future going to others who clearly only get it because they are men.
Caine and Moore ream up to destroy the bank, which allowed the former’ wife to die of cancer because the company insurance would no longer pay for treatment, while the latter wants revenge for mistreatment.
I believe this movie is based on a true a story (similar to Jason Statham’s, “The Bank Job”).
Wonderfully done, this is a revenge movie for the ages where one doesn’t need garbage like “Citizen Vigilante” to feel any sense of justice…
A comment from one of Youtube vids showing part of the movie:
As for
I am sure that’s an analogy.
For anyone trying to do the movie stuff in real world a DIFFERENT skillset is required. Starting with counter-surveillance…etc..etc….
Plenty of that within the native victim population, of course. No will to act at the moment, though.
Interesting times.
It is now on my list, thanks!
If the wealthy keep on their current path, there’s going to be a lot more. Not just on screens either.
You are correct.
This video was not only an honest critique of immigrants themselves (who attempt to import their social and cultural mores, good and bad) but was also an indictment of government which not only enables criminal behavior by immigrants giving them lenient sentences while going full force against native citizens who protest these government actions much more harshly.
The entire family attempted to justify and make excuses for the rape of the woman on religious and cultural grounds. Even the female members of the family went along with and attempted to justify the rape as well.
The principle actor in the video clarified his position stating that just maybe the “wrong” (criminally disposed) refugees were admitted.
Although it was difficult to watch the demise of the whole family, one can easily see where the director was going with it.
My solution: Stop all of israel’s wars in the middle east and “encourage” (by removing all government social welfare programs directed at immigrants) and assisting the immigrants in returning to their homelands.
Best regards,
That’s about 3 or 4 of you all who trashed the movie without watching it. It’s free, you know. You don’t have to spend $25 at the theater. I can’t say whether it was well acted, well cast, well directed or any of that – not my thing. – but, with a few exceptions of serious unbelievability, it was pretty good.
It’s banned in Germany. What should that tell you – they are afraid of it riling up the masses. Why? Because the movie is very timely, almost coincidentally.
What was a step too far for the movie makers, as I wrote in my review, is that these “migrants” (the Moslem family in that scene described) are seen to be “the bad ones” or whatever the vigilante character said. Very much like Trump’s “They’re not sending their best”, that point steers people away from the real problem that, even if these people were as polite, civil, and law-abiding as the average European, they don’t belong there!
.
[5 minute window EDIT:] I see that Anarchyst mentioned that last point of mine just above.
When I returned to add “LOL”, my original mistaken “TROLL” was automatically replaced.
Ron Unz has thought of nearly everything.
All the best
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/HCkVGJY_gG8
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/israel-politics/2026-03-26/ty-article/.premium/no-innocent-children-israeli-lawmaker-defends-killing-of-palestinian-family/0000019d-2976-d8a3-abff-39764b2e0000
The film isn’t banned in Germany, but nobody wants to screen it.
I preferred the simpler times , when the Hammer clan were selling Faberge Eggs , and were making money for relatives in Russia . The ‘burning ‘ Bush mob were Hitler’s bankers at the time , so all was evened out in the ledgers of the farce called ‘ show biz ‘ .
In a perverse sort of way…never being able to trust the jews…or their motives.
The video “Citizen Vigilante” was released by “X” (thanks Elon Musk) at the behest of the jews. Normally such a video would be seen as a “fringe” creation available for paying customers only.
The ending of the movie was an attempt to justify the wholesale genocide taking place in Gaza, the West Bank and Lebanon as we speak. This video was disseminated for free in order for the jews to justify their wholesale genocides taking place.
Just my two-cents on the subject…it makes one wonder…
P. S: I got a lot out of the video…
If you had watched the movie, the entire immigrant family was OK with and tried to justify the rape of the woman. Even the women in the Muslim family made excuses for their relative’s behavior.
Watch the video before you pass judgement on it…
Reader, I trust you will permit me to briefly extend my earlier remarks (comment no. 10) on the instantly famous, or infamous, Citizen Vigilante. I am several days older, though probably not wiser, but at least I’ve had time to ponder it.*
I’ll stick by some observations I made. If anything, the generally slapdash character of the film looms even larger in my recall. As director, Uwe Boll is remarkably untalented as he hauls us through mostly derivative and shapeless scenes. The story doesn’t build the way a good script does, it just winds its way through a series of angry incidents.
There’s not much connective tissue between the blood-soaked moments, only distractions, and those can be puzzlingly irrelevant. In theory the phony character development is meant to show us another, unpleasant side of our protagonist Sanders’s personality (if shooting and stomping on people or killing them in a deliberate car crash isn’t unpleasant enough). But firing the entire personnel team at his real estate management office in one go is dead stupid — who’s going to keep the business running? And his coitus interruptus at the brothel he owns when his attention is captured by a leak in the wall suggests sex isn’t, you know, his thing.
But enough piling on. The reason I came back here for another round is that my original comment failed to note a key point: a last, climactic scene is devastatingly powerful and even — wait for it — tightly and professionally directed.
I suppose I should insert a SPOILER ALERT here, although if you’ve read through the comments on this piece or a number of reviews elsewhere, you know what scene I’m talking about.
Sanders tracks down the whole migrant family of a juvenile criminal and deals retribution suspensefully and shockingly. Not a moment is wasted or seems contrived while you watch it. As Sanders, Armie Hammer reaches the apex of his convincing performance throughout the picture.
How could a movie otherwise borderline retarded pull itself together successfully in its denouement? Did Boll sneak in a talented director and editor for this sequence? Did he actually have a stash of creativity and professionalism in his mental attic and called on it when the spirit moved him, while hardly bothering with the rest of Citizen Vigilante? When filming this scene, unlike the others, did he genuinely feel something like Sanders’s outrage at police and judicial failure to curb third world migrant crime? Did that concentrate his mind for a change?
I wish the rest of the movie were as focused. As it is, there’s too much the woke media can legitimately clamp on for negative criticism, even if just a lack of filmmaking craftsmanship. But that will spill over into discussions of the social and political issues it raises.
*Something like Wordsworth’s “emotion recollected in tranquility,” except the movie ain’t hardly poetic.
Yep. Except it wasn’t a woman. It was 14 years old girl. 14. And it was a gang rape, judging from the number of those bodies in the apartment.
The conversation with the family. ALL of them had quite…..interesting…..replies to the shooter. Quick, well rehearsed.
Almost as they had these well memorized from somewhere else.
Which points to two directions.
Let’s skip the obvious. Focus on the second. That judge speech as an example.
It’s pity that the scene with the judge wasn’t done as with the family. Having the shooter and the judge have a chat before the termination.
Movie didn’t go there. Pity.
Felt short. Too ambitious, perhaps, for the start. Too complicated for the target audience. Let’s keep the message as simple as possible.
In the sequel/remake perhaps ?
“The media” is shrinking and dying.
There are lots of movies and content / news outside of their control and it grows every day. Same with music, art, comedy, which are all marketed direct online skipping the middle men.
Only the boomers stuck in the rut of thinking they need to consume more from the same crap factories they always have, long after the product quality has diminished. Ever see “blue ruin?” Not a Hollyweird studio movie. People still watched it. It was on Netflix etc.
Even the middle aged man babies don’t watch marvel movies. Gamers don’t subscribe to games made by people who hate them, this is evidenced by the massive layoffs in the wokest developers / publishers. And yet you can go on Kickstarter and find basically anything you want from the dev shops you remember like “Sierra on line”.
Science fiction book sales by the big publishers are in the toilet now that they all push this crap. Meanwhile arkhaven for example is growing and growing.
This movie we’re talking about here is a new example of a constant recent phenomenon, even if you haven’t noticed at all.
A food for thought, perhaps. You don’t need to reply.
I’ll keep it short.
I guess you’ve seen “The Wild Bunch”. A lot has been written, spoken etc. about the movie.
A smart critic can dissect the movie in million small pieces and toss it in garbage….Contemporary in particular.
A gun nut can point to the machinegun ammo load, rackings of the charging handle…..
An average viewer can point to multiple wounds and the guys still working…..
Etc..etc..etc…Plenty of …ahm….wrong stuff….in the movie.
The scene starting when Pike swipes the blanket aside and looks at those two. “Let’s go”. Completing when they line up to start walking.
That’s the movie.
For some people, anyway.
To hell with Variety and other publications are calling it immoral. Let’s wipe these leftist communistic maggots off the face of our Western Culture and Civilization. And I want all these 3rd world alien maggots purged out of our Western Culture. That’s it. Also Sean Hannity was still talking about 3rd world shit like the Butanese, Napalese, and the vile sub-saharan east african nigger somali maggots stealing medicare and medicaid money in the tens of billions or hundreds of billions of dollars. Our money that we pay to our Federal government is being stolen by 3rd world shit! Also the scumbag politicians on both sides like that goon Mike Dewine of Ohio and the AG who does nothing about this massive criminal fraud being perpetrated by 3rd world shit on me and my fellow American Nationals. These aliens need to be punished severly with any politicians who are helping them out or looking the other way. After these low-life scumbags serve their harsh prison terms then they need to be marked biometrically and sent back to where their filthy alien asses came from and never be let back into any Western country. And that includes their shit offsring…
You are correct on both counts. The victim was a 14-year old girl and it was a gang rape.
The whole family was complicit in making excuses…both religious, cultural and feigning ignorance.
Best regards,
Pigslam sand-nigger arabs need to be exterminated completely out of Europe, America, Canada and Australia, period. That’s how lame these sand-nigger arabs and niggers are that they always seek out the European-Western man no matter where he is. This also applies to the far-eastern chicomms who are now a major enemy of us. Now here’s another point. Take for example that wet-back maggot who killed that Georgia girl. Now why, why are we allowing this maggot to still remain alive? Are you telling me that we are going to house this maggot in a prison and we are going to have to pay at our taxpayer expense to keep this orc alive for say the next 50 years? What are you fuck’in kidding me? It well past due to start executing these alien low-lifes now…
Somali immigrant detained after car plows into London shoppers (VIDEOS)
Five people were injured after a vehicle struck pedestrians, police said
Published 27 Jun, 2026 22:00 | Updated 28 Jun, 2026 06:22
Somali immigrant detained after car plows into London shoppers (VIDEOS)
Screenshot from a video showing a car striking pedestrians in London on June 28, 2026. © Social media
A Somali-born British man has been detained on suspicion of attempted murder after a car plowed into pedestrians in London.
Get a load of this filthy language calling a sub-saharan east african nigger somali a ‘British man.’ How vile and disgusting. He’s about as British (Anglo-Saxon) as kunta kinte! I mean just the pure prostitution and perversion of the natiral law of identity is sickening today. Now hang that maggot.
Also: Immigrant behind deadly German Christmas market attack gets life sentence
Saudi national Taleb al-Abdulmohsen rammed a car into a crowd in Magdeburg in 2024, killing six people, including a child. Execute this maggot. Why should the German people pay to house this scum in prison for the rest of his wretched life?
Elements of fedgov have known about the Somali fraud of “Learing Center” fame since 2020 (Walz & company). Note that this obvious criminal syndicate has not been charged….. with anything.
Who has to be steering this whole mess for this to occur? Washington has to be disassembled brick by brick until nothing is left.
Good thoughts, peterAUS. Sam Peckinpah, director of The Wild Bunch, was a brilliant filmmaker who seemed to operate on instinct as much as technique. Very troubled, but brilliant, a true auteur. One of my favorite movies, The Wild Bunch does not in my view exploit violence, but uses it thematically.
I wish Citizen Vigilante had been made by someone as capable as Peckinpah, but that’s wishing for the moon. At least what’s good about it makes up somewhat for its deficits. We can be thankful it will set off many a conversation about the West’s suicidal population replacement.
A most excellent movie! Certainly, watching all those cops get shot to pieces, their body parts flying everywhere, was epic! I haven’t seen such a wonderful cinematic depiction since that scene in The Terminator when Arnold liquidates all the cops in the Hollywood police station. That’s exactly what needs to be done and would be nice to see in the real world, but of course, the likelihood of its happening is vanishingly small. As a commenter pointed out above, it’s ridiculous to think the cops would just stand there and oblige the man in the fortified box by letting him kill them. If they were like the cops at Waco, Whidbey Island, and the ones that exchanged fire with the SLA in 1974 in Los Angeles, they would have followed standard procedure and taken cover, then burned the building down on top of “citizen vigilante”. Also the cold-blooded murder of the whole family of hadjis was beautiful, the stuff of dreams.
It’s obvious why Elon Musk likes the film. He identifies with the hero! Of course, there are very good reasons why rich people like Elon don’t ever behave like that in real life. Because in this way it holds out a false hope, but is still very entertaining, I give the film four out of five stars. A cult classic in the making!
It’s Inglorious Basterds 2. This time the Jew fights the anti-Jewish Muslims.
I think I better watch Taken. Same story, but the hero is not a Jew.
Well…………….
If, say, Michael Mann had directed the movie, with those two advisors he had with “Heat”, the first (entry) team would’ve been moved down in a plausible way. With hardware seen available to the shooter there would’ve been a couple of options I am not, for obvious reasons, going to write here.
After that, correct, the second team would’ve retreated and the police, with military assistance (movie was shot in Croatia, and it would’ve worked the same in any East European country), would’ve burned/brought down the house. Fallujah style.
To put the things in perspective: “Saving Private Ryan” is seen as excellent war movie. Realistic to the hilt.
The opening sequence, true.
The rest downhill.
That attack on MG nest was act of lunacy and it wouldn’t have worked, actually. Try to argue that with 99.99 % people who’ve seen the movie.
Let’s hope so.
More importantly, the first of many to come. Soon.
I live in northern VA where there is a German military liaison building eight miles east of Dulles IAP. Every year the organization has held a German Christmas festival with lots of German foods to eat, gluehwein, German Christmas music, etc. It’s very popular and always a good time, but last year it was canceled. The official reason was the lack of a budget to cover it but I suspect the real reason was they couldn’t afford the cost to provide the necessary level of security, the same reason such festivals get canceled in Germany. I’m sure the Germans are aware there’s no shortage of Mideasterners and Muslims in the region and I suspect they didn’t want to risk something very unpleasant taking place here, just like back home.
peterAUS: “More importantly, the first of many to come. Soon. ”
Could be. But it’s hard to tell. In one sense the movie’s a good effort at agitprop, and it would be nice if it spawned a whole genre of similar films, but I found it ideologically confused, and that will work against such an outcome. Specifically, its anti-rape message comes across as feminist. The hero is the white knight that Western men have been trained to be by their Christianity-derived culture of “human rights”. In effect, he defends women no matter what they do. I was left with the impression they could walk around naked in a rough part of town, get drunk and pass out on the street with their legs splayed, and he’d defend their right to do that and not be “raped” too. This makes our brave psychopath a total doormat to women and a douche bag, which is an incongruous look at best. Objecting to the Mudslime invasion because Hadji’s not feminist enough is inherently a weak position, it seems to me, and one unlikely to lead anywhere good. It’s not even a revolutionary position. Insofar as it supports feminism, it supports the status quo.
I can but reiterate a criticism I made on another thread that the only way for “remigration” to succeed is to jettison the idea of “human rights” completely, forcibly round the aliens up, and expel them, either horizontally or vertically, into the ground. Making the departure voluntary is the same approach used by Abraham Lincoln back in the nineteenth century with respect to America’s nigger problem. He was respectful of their “human rights” too. It didn’t work then, and I don’t see it working now. Do white men in modern technological society value their race enough to do what’s required? Or do they value the smooth operation of that society more than their racial life? I think there’s little doubt that doing what’s required would result in bloodshed, and probably a lot of it; even civil wars. My prediction is it won’t happen.
The scene in the park: the vigilante went hard on the boys; the girl, quite active member of the crew, simply disappeared from the scene. One moment she was there….next moment she simply isn’t in the scene anymore. Vanished in the thin air.
The vigilante let her go.
“Men on Fire”. “I’ll kill them all”. “You kill them all”.
And he didn’t even hurt the woman who was willing part of the abduction crew.
Of course.
Worked with Germans at the end of WW2. White colonists later on. Ethnic groups in recent Balkans wars.
Interestingly enough, and related to “Hadjis”, that’s exactly how they got their countries from the carcass of Yugoslavia. In Bosnia, an Islamic state in all by name, by cleansing Serbs and Croats. In Kosovo by cleansing Serbs.
Nope.
Former, of course.
Yep.
90 % probability, IMHO.
Miracles do happen, though. Dum spiro, spero, a?
peterAUS: “… the girl, quite active member of the crew, simply disappeared from the scene. One moment she was there….next moment she simply isn’t in the scene anymore. Vanished in the thin air.
The vigilante let her go. ”
Yes, that was a big hole in the story line. Of course, the white knight’s hitting or in any way punishing the girl would have conflicted with the movie’s overall feminist message, which is that women ought to be able to do anything they want and suffer no consequences. Here someone might object that Sanders does in fact deal harshly with the Hadji women, and that’s true. But notice, he does so only because they opposed feminism! Their native patriarchal culture views male power over women as normal, and that can’t be allowed in modern Western society. So the problem wasn’t just that these people were non-white. In fact, our hero states or at least implies that there are “good” non-whites who should be allowed to stay. Not being feminist enough was their real crime. That was the reason he had to murder them.
Great discussion here, yours, PeterAUS, and others. I’m not much of a reviewer. I am pretty good at suspending disbelief, so I missed some of these things in my review.
Of course, the elimination of the whole Moslem clan kept this a “feel-good movie”, haha, but I remember thinking that the girl in the family was bringing up one Moslem value that I don’t half disagree with.
I note too that, yes, girls being assaulted and raped is terrible, but men too have been killed, and it is men who will be killed and maimed if it comes down to that to set things right. (It looks like it may have to – the UK is a good example. The Globalists there will never back down until some of them are scared for their lives.)
The Feminism aspect of this movie is one that I hadn’t put enough though into until you guys wrote here. Thanks.
An idea: a GOOD writer, from the Right of the political spectrum, could write a novelization of the movie.
Change some parts, of course. Hehe….those mentioned in this thread.
Shouldn’t be hard to do for somebody who’s good and it shouldn’t take much time either.
Put it on the Internet.
One small step at the time, a?
Some could also make a “fan edit”. Put it on the Internet, of course.
Re not hurting women in this, and related movies, of course there is feminist agenda.
I guess it also has…say…”esthetics” and, more importantly, practical reason.
Former, well, giving a girl the same punching/kicking treatment as one gives a man in a street fight….doesn’t LOOK good. For the target audience males. Keyword “target audience”.
Later, more important, it’s about native (potential victim) women watching the movie. Women thing. Knights and such. A knight can cut bloody path through a bunch of men…but, well, can’t really punch a woman.
Imagine Jeremiah Johnston getting Crow women and kids. Which is exactly what they did to him.
And it was in the era of “Wild Bunch”. At least Pike’s crew had no problem with “equal opportunity” shooting. Try to make a remake today………………………………..I shudder at the thought.
A suggestion, perhaps: when watching similar movies one can skip the scenes he/she doesn’t like. And, in those he/she can he/she can fill in the gaps.
Say, this below.
I stop when the shooter fires for the first time in the building (at 05:11 here). And, from the very beginning I imagine he has sniper cover; snipers, say…3 of them on different overwatch locations… will fire only if the shooter is in DIRE straits.
And, it’s happening in a town where local SWAT got distracted somewhere else.
Video Link