You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(259) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(361) |
Feb
(71) |
Mar
(270) |
Apr
(164) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(218) |
Jul
(203) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(105) |
Oct
(70) |
Nov
(156) |
Dec
(223) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(229) |
Feb
(126) |
Mar
(461) |
Apr
(288) |
May
(203) |
Jun
(64) |
Jul
(97) |
Aug
(228) |
Sep
(384) |
Oct
(208) |
Nov
(88) |
Dec
(291) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(425) |
Feb
(382) |
Mar
(457) |
Apr
(300) |
May
(323) |
Jun
(326) |
Jul
(487) |
Aug
(458) |
Sep
(636) |
Oct
(429) |
Nov
(174) |
Dec
(288) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(242) |
Feb
(148) |
Mar
(146) |
Apr
(148) |
May
(200) |
Jun
(134) |
Jul
(120) |
Aug
(183) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(253) |
Nov
(248) |
Dec
(63) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(96) |
Feb
(65) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(172) |
May
(122) |
Jun
(111) |
Jul
(83) |
Aug
(210) |
Sep
(102) |
Oct
(37) |
Nov
(28) |
Dec
(41) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(82) |
Feb
(84) |
Mar
(218) |
Apr
(61) |
May
(66) |
Jun
(35) |
Jul
(55) |
Aug
(64) |
Sep
(20) |
Oct
(92) |
Nov
(420) |
Dec
(399) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(149) |
Feb
(72) |
Mar
(209) |
Apr
(155) |
May
(77) |
Jun
(150) |
Jul
(142) |
Aug
(99) |
Sep
(78) |
Oct
(98) |
Nov
(82) |
Dec
(25) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(38) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(129) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(106) |
Jun
(121) |
Jul
(149) |
Aug
(110) |
Sep
(74) |
Oct
(98) |
Nov
(83) |
Dec
(46) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(53) |
Feb
(43) |
Mar
(86) |
Apr
(185) |
May
(44) |
Jun
(58) |
Jul
(41) |
Aug
(47) |
Sep
(52) |
Oct
(49) |
Nov
(47) |
Dec
(66) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(58) |
Feb
(33) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(28) |
Sep
(75) |
Oct
(46) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(61) |
Feb
(32) |
Mar
(20) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(11) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(16) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(12) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(21) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(18) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(13) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(33) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(44) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(12) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
1
(2) |
2
(3) |
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
(1) |
7
(4) |
8
|
9
|
10
(2) |
11
|
|
12
|
13
(1) |
14
|
15
(1) |
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
(5) |
20
(1) |
21
|
22
(2) |
23
|
24
(3) |
25
(1) |
|
26
|
27
|
28
(1) |
29
(1) |
30
|
|
|
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-11-29 23:43:38
|
Feature Requests item #1605711, was opened at 2006-11-30 00:43 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428519&aid=1605711&group_id=40604 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Paulussie (holthp) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Support for Realtek rtl8110sc NIC Initial Comment: I am not sure this is the right place and right way to put this but let me try: I would like to see default support for the Realtek rtl8110sc NIC chipset. This chipset is now (1.4.11) seen as rtl8169 when probing for interfaces but that leads to a non-working system. I found someone who compiled the linux driver from Realtek for IPCop use. After installing this driver I can confirm that it does work. The rtl8110sc is found in the 3xGigaLan daugtherboard that makes a nice, small and relatively cheap 4-segment router together with a Jetway Mini-ITX motherboard. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428519&aid=1605711&group_id=40604 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-11-28 16:36:16
|
Feature Requests item #1604573, was opened at 2006-11-28 17:36 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428519&aid=1604573&group_id=40604 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: Next release Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Dr. Uwe Meyer-Gruhl (meyergru) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Support for OpenDNS,com dynamic IP update Initial Comment: OpenDNS.com now has the ability to manage DNS settings based on the IP that the DNS request originates from. For example, one can disable the wildcard matching, which can break some things, but still benefit from the other features of OpenDNS name resolution. They use the same protocol as DynDNS.org for IP updates, sans the parameters (i.e. only basic authentication is needed). However, they use SSL with this URL: https://updates.opendns.com/account/ddns.php? There are only two files that need modification: 1. /home/httpd/cgi-bin/ddns.cgi for the form to support opendns.com (not even hostnames or other fields are needed). 2. /usr/local/bin/setddns.pl to trigger the url (much like the section for "dynu", only with "get_https()" and base64-encoded authentication, some error reporting is needed, though, see: http://www.opendns.com/account/dynamic_dns.php) Should be very easy to do. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428519&aid=1604573&group_id=40604 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-11-25 13:46:15
|
Feature Requests item #1602698, was opened at 2006-11-25 15:46 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428519&aid=1602698&group_id=40604 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: mousi (mousi) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Can use it with zerina Initial Comment: I use Zerina 0.9.7a10 and I read somewhere that tap protocol is not available because ipcop's kernel doesn't support it... I use IPCop 1.4.11! If it supports it then I guess I have to talk to zerina Developers ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428519&aid=1602698&group_id=40604 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-11-24 23:13:55
|
Feature Requests item #1602516, was opened at 2006-11-25 01:13 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428519&aid=1602516&group_id=40604 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: mousi (mousi) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Tap Support Initial Comment: I'd like to see tap support in ipcop's kernel... Are you planning on doing this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428519&aid=1602516&group_id=40604 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-11-24 17:39:24
|
Bugs item #1602393, was opened at 2006-11-24 18:39 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428516&aid=1602393&group_id=40604 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: tralalo (tralalo) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Mylex / Raid 1 Initial Comment: Hi, after installing Ipcop 1.4.11 from CD. WhenI reboot the system now I always get a kernel panic as it cannot find my root partition. In my case: /dev/rd/c0d0p4. I am using Mylex Controler configured to Raid 1. My problem looks very similar to bug 1587368, but I am not sure if this is the same bug. I had the same sympthons on a gentoo machine when gentoo switched from devfs to udev. The udev-version at that time was too low, but with the next update of udev the problem was fixed. Well, this is only an idea where the solution might be... Ciao ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428516&aid=1602393&group_id=40604 |
|
From: Gilles E. <g....@fr...> - 2006-11-24 13:20:41
|
I find some simple ideas how to fight simple spam script kiddies on postn= uke forum. I will not describe here the details at it is not that hard to mak= e the fix ineffective. Not yet implemented, I should try that this week-end. Gilles |
|
From: Franck B. <fbo...@ch...> - 2006-11-22 23:10:49
|
Le mercredi 22 novembre 2006 10:01, Eric Oberlander a =E9crit=A0: > I've noticed that some of the News pages on www.ipcop.org are being > spammed by some automated system, vis: > http://www.ipcop.org/modules.php?op=3Dmodload&name=3DNews&file=3Dar= ticle&sid=3D29&m >ode=3Dthread&order=3D0&thold=3D0 > > There are 15 useless comments on that page, and more on some of the > earlier stories, such as 'IPCop 1.4.5 released. > > Who do we contact to alert them to the problem, and to get them rem= oved? > > Eric > > -------------------------------------------------------------------= ------ > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to s= hare > your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and e= arn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&= CID=3DDEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > IPCop-devel mailing list > IPC...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipcop-devel phpnuke=3D beurk; The site will be submerged with spams if we don't immediately remove all newly created accounts. A human create accounts; few weeks latters, robots come to actions. With more and more stupidities. Next step is accept manually new accounts. No other way. I have no rigth to do manage; Franck |
|
From: Eric O. <eri...@gm...> - 2006-11-22 09:01:10
|
I've noticed that some of the News pages on www.ipcop.org are being spammed by some automated system, vis: http://www.ipcop.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=29&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0 There are 15 useless comments on that page, and more on some of the earlier stories, such as 'IPCop 1.4.5 released. Who do we contact to alert them to the problem, and to get them removed? Eric |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-11-20 16:17:25
|
Feature Requests item #1599811, was opened at 2006-11-20 11:17 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428519&aid=1599811&group_id=40604 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Jack Doyle (jfrayzier) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Traffic shaping by IP Initial Comment: I would like to have the ability to shape traffic by IP address rather than just port. i.e. I have a Packet8 (VOIP) box on my network. It uses port 80, so I can't shape by port and distinguish from web traffic. If I could shape by IP that would be awesome. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428519&aid=1599811&group_id=40604 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-11-19 16:20:04
|
Feature Requests item #1599257, was opened at 2006-11-19 17:20 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428519&aid=1599257&group_id=40604 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Olaf Westrik (owes) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Update iptstate Initial Comment: Please update iptstate from 1.4 to actual version 2.1 Info http://www.phildev.net/iptstate/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428519&aid=1599257&group_id=40604 |
|
From: <ipc...@pr...> - 2006-11-19 15:08:35
|
Hi, all, How many of you have seen the Extra Interfaces addon at =20 www.ban-solms.de (http://www.ban-solms.de/t/IPCop-xtiface.html) It allows declaring two additional interfaces (which are imaginatively =20 called gray1 and gray2), upping IPCop to a max of 6 interfaces. The addon allows grays 1 & 2 to give out DHCP addresses, allows some =20 modification of firewall rules, etc. I haven't delved completely into it or the files that it modifies, but =20 what are our thoughts on bringing it into the main game? That way we =20 can log activity, stats and the dreaded graphs (not done now), =20 provide better security (no snort options on the new interfaces), and =20 allow better routing. The extra subnets are attractive to me. Or maybe we need to liaise better with the addons developers to ensure =20 that some things are included, such as the snort options. In this =20 case, we could suggest what additions need to be made, and where they =20 need to be made. Personally, I like the addon as presented as a good starting point, =20 and would like to see it incorporated in some way so that we can cover =20 the security and logging aspects. I would like an extra wired and =20 wireless interface at my site- one for my staff, and one for my =20 visitors, but with the same options as for blue at the moment but with =20 different levels...) I'm happy to take over any liaising/approaches to the addon developer. Any thoughts? Cheers, David. |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-11-19 12:59:26
|
Feature Requests item #1599190, was opened at 2006-11-19 13:59 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428519&aid=1599190&group_id=40604 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Olaf Westrik (owes) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Use uptodate terminfo database Initial Comment: Please include actual terminfo database from http://catb.org/esr/terminfo/ This makes using ncurses based tools on console and in PuTTy sessions much more colorfull by default. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428519&aid=1599190&group_id=40604 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-11-19 12:53:17
|
Feature Requests item #1599188, was opened at 2006-11-19 13:53 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428519&aid=1599188&group_id=40604 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: Next release Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Olaf Westrik (owes) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Update ncurses Initial Comment: Please update ncurses to the actual version (v5.5). As you can see here (http://www.gnu.org/software/ncurses/ncurses.html) the list of changes and modifications is loooong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428519&aid=1599188&group_id=40604 |
|
From: Andrew M. <and...@af...> - 2006-11-19 05:07:55
|
Hi Guys, Don't know if this site could help with language translations, but I think it could. http://www.translingo.org It's primary goal is: "Create a website that makes translations for other websites and applications a walk in the park!" Kind Regards AndrewM Andrew McGlashan Broadband Solutions now including VoIP 1300 85 3804 Mobile: 04 2574 1827 Fax: 03 8790 1224 Affinity Vision Australia Pty Ltd www.affinityvision.com.au www.affinityvision.net/adsl/ In Case of Emergency -- http://www.affinityvision.com.au/ice.html |
|
From: Dale S. \(I. Plymouth\) <DS...@it...> - 2006-11-15 13:13:35
|
=20 Is=20there=20a=20plan=20to=20configure=20IPCop=20or=20modify=20it=20with=20= 'balance'=20or similar=20tools=20to=20enable=20it=20to=20load=20balance=20or=20forward=20= incoming=20traffic to=20different=20servers=20on=20ORANGE=20based=20on=20the=20load=20on=20th= e=20servers? For=20example=20I=20want=20to=20have=202=20webservers=20behind=20IPCOP=20a= nd=20inbound=20port=2080 traffic=20to=20be=20intelligently=20forwarded=20to=20the=20servers=20depen= ding=20on=20if=20the servers=20are=20available=20or=20busy. An=20existing=20linux=20tool=20to=20do=20this=20is=20Ultra=20Monkey http://www.ultramonkey.org/,=20but=20it=20would=20be=20nice=20to=20do=20it= =20from=20an=20IPCop box. This=20would=20be=20a=20good=20feature=20to=20add.=20=20Is=20there=20curre= ntly=20any=20development in=20this=20area? =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 Thanks,=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20 Dale=20 ______________________________________________________________________ This=20email=20has=20been=20scanned=20by=20the=20MessageLabs=20Email=20Sec= urity=20System. For=20more=20information=20visit=20http://www.virtual-email.net/messagelab= s.htm |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-11-13 16:32:00
|
Bugs item #1595722, was opened at 2006-11-13 17:31 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428516&aid=1595722&group_id=40604 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Installation Group: 1.4.11 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Marino (ilnebbioso) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Reboots after accepting SSL certificate to login WebAdmin Initial Comment: I'm using a quite old pc with an unknown mainboard (there's no mobo name on it :shock: and Post doesn't give any useful information) with a PIII 800Mhz EB. This box has also got integrated: VGA, Ethernet, USB and so on. Unfortunally I'm not able to disable Ethernet from BIOS (that's another strange thing: there's no option related!), but the IpCop installer seems it doesn't find it. So, I installed two identical Ethernet adapter into two of three PCI slots, who IpCop installer recognize fine. The install gone fine (I tryed it three times), and I'm able to login on console without any problem. I can also ping from green the box. Once I try to connect by browser (IE, Firefox or Netscape on Windows) at https://192.168.1.254:445/ or http://192.168.1.254:81/, the browser asks me for the Certificate. When I accept it, nothing happens. Having a continuous ping (ping -t 192.168.1.254) and looking at console monitor once I accept the certificate from the browser, IpCop simply reboots. Following the screen dump: divide error: 0000 CPU: 0 EIP: 0010:[<c0106c27>] EFLAGS: 00000246 eax: 00000000 ebx: c0106c04 ecx: 00000032 edx: 00000019 esi: c028a000 edi: c028a000 ebp: ffffe000 esp: c028bfe0 ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss:0018 Process swapper (pid: 0, stackpage = c028b0000) Stack: c0106c92 (00000002 00099800 c0105000 0008e000 c028c6771 c02a4880 c0......) Call trace: [<c0106c92>] [<c0105000>] Code: c3 fb 8d 76 00 c3 8d 76 00 fb b8 ff ff ff ff ba 00 e0 ff ff <0>Kernel panic: Attempted to kill the idle task! In idle task - not syncing <0>Rebooting in 10 seconds.... Please consider I'm a newbie with Linux trying to help me: I didn't change nothing regarding configuration but from the installer. What can I do? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428516&aid=1595722&group_id=40604 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-11-10 22:56:36
|
Bugs item #1594463, was opened at 2006-11-10 14:56 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428516&aid=1594463&group_id=40604 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: User Interface Group: 1.4.11 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: mtinman (mtinman) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Graphs not working Initial Comment: The graphs in my installation of IPCop are not working after I reset the time on the IPCop interface. I tried the commands that were listed in the admin manual (fcrontab -z, and makegraphs), but it still doesn't work. When I tried the makegraphs command as root, I got some error messages regarding an Error in RRD: Illegal attempt to update time values for CPU, Disk, Green, and Red when last time is more than 1 second different from the original time settings. What do I do? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428516&aid=1594463&group_id=40604 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-11-10 21:18:18
|
Feature Requests item #1594428, was opened at 2006-11-10 15:18 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428519&aid=1594428&group_id=40604 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Mike Eggleston (edwyr) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Sort traffic shapping rules Initial Comment: Currently the traffic shapping rules are displayed in the order of entry of those rules. Please add either as a default or as a configuration setting some way so those can stay sorted from High->Low. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428519&aid=1594428&group_id=40604 |
|
From: Mike <mi...@mi...> - 2006-11-07 17:47:19
|
Please add an 'All' or 'Raw' to the options in the Section drop down. This selection should return all sections orderd by time (or reverse time) and 'Raw' should return the raw logs. Mike |
|
From: Mike <mi...@mi...> - 2006-11-07 13:30:18
|
I like the DMZ Pinhole screen for what it does. I would like the ability of this screen expanded such that it shows all zones and allows the creation of routing or blocking rules. Rather than adding custom rules to /etc/rc.d/rc.firewall.local I would like to create those rules directly on this screen. Mike |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-11-07 07:21:52
|
Feature Requests item #1591837, was opened at 2006-11-07 08:21 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428519&aid=1591837&group_id=40604 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: phulstaert (phulstaert) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Total Reset Initial Comment: Ipcop is great, but it is even better with it's add-ons. Unfortunately sometimes those add-ons create errors, or a better version comes along, and we want to uninstall the add-on. Sometimes this goes terribly wrong and you are stuck with an interface still with half of the add-ons options. It would be great if there was an option or command that enabled us to reset all information and replace all altered files. (maybe an option to retain certain data like everything needed for VPN so we can do this remotely) This way we can create a clean system from a remote location and correct otherwise uncorrectable errors. The downside is we will have to reinstall and reconfigure all installed add-ons. But on the other hand, this was kind of the point. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=428519&aid=1591837&group_id=40604 |
|
From: Jiang L. <liu...@gm...> - 2006-11-07 03:14:48
|
Hi all, I am wondering if anyone has experience at adding the bridge function to the IPCOP. Currently I am using IPCOP 1.4.11 and want to upgrade the kernel to 2.6 and the bridge function. However, I have problems modifying the ./lfs/linux makfile to make the compilation work. Can anyone give me some advice on this? Thanks a lot. Jiang |
|
From: Jiang L. <lj...@mo...> - 2006-11-06 13:21:27
|
Hi all, I am wondering if anyone has experience at adding the bridge function to the IPCOP. Currently I am using IPCOP 1.4.11 and want to upgrade the kernel to 2.6 and the bridge function. However, I have problems modifying the ./lfs/linux makfile to make the compilation work. Can anyone give me some advice on this? Thanks a lot. Jiang |
|
From: Mohamed H. <mh...@em...> - 2006-11-02 23:38:40
|
we have just got this new server with an Intel PRO 1000PT Cu, Dual Port PCI nic; ipcop could not recognize it automaticlly; on using the manual select we keep getting the message "unable to load module", teh same is true when using modprobe. so my question is do anybody know that there is a problem with the e1000 PT dual port on IPCop? and if so what would be the solution for that. thanks; |
|
From: Eric O. <eri...@gm...> - 2006-11-02 16:57:22
|
On 11/2/06, Mike <mi...@mi...> wrote: > There is a backup-to-floppy that stores the current configurat > (does it get copfilter or other add-on settings?). Should there > also be a load-from-floppy? > > Mike It's on Gilles Espinasse To Do List. It was mentioned in the recent discussions regarding the modifications to backup for v1.4.11. Eric |