“When alleged white nationalist Jared Taylor took to the podium, . . . before him sat nearly 40 attendees . . . . Also sitting before Taylor were nearly 40 empty seats.” So begins the article in the Grand Junction Daily Sentinel about a talk I gave on March 27. Perhaps the author didn’t know that the event had been elbowed into a room with only 80 seats, that the tickets had been quickly snapped up, and that many people had deliberately taken tickets they would not use to make the attendance look meager.
The Sentinel went on: While I spoke, a campus-wide outdoor party “in response to Taylor’s rhetoric” was in full swing, with “three food trucks . . . a mechanical bull, volleyball and football activities on the grass, students cooking burgers on the grill, and a stage with a DJ set loudly blasting songs like Green Day’s ‘American Idiot’.” The Sentinel forgot to mention the moon bounce — yes, a moon bounce — along with the beanbag toss, with which students eloquently refuted my arguments. Nor did it mention that the food and rides were free, and that the “unity party” was deliberately timed to draw students away from my talk.
After I spoke — full video here — local television interviewed a young man from the audience who said he had wanted to ask a question but that men had threatened to kick him out of the room “as soon as I opened my mouth.” In fact, I answered three of his questions, but he bobbed up and down, hogged the mic, and was such an ass, campus security threatened to eject him.
I have spoken at many colleges, but never have I sent an entire campus into hysterics.
It was in January that I heard from Max Applebaugh, president of the Western Culture Club at Colorado Mesa University. He asked me to come speak, and we set the date for March 27. The first students heard about it was on March 7, when university president John Marshall sent an 800-word statement to the entire campus. He agonized over “the most difficult and important test CMU has faced when it comes to free speech,” but explained that the First Amendment is “sacred,” adding that “our task is to empower you to pursue truth.” He called my views “vile” and “abhorrent,” but told students, “[I]t’s the opportunity of your life . . . to carefully deconstruct his dehumanizing ideas.”
Just three days later, 200 outraged students met in a campus ballroom to plan how to counter the menace of “white supremacy” about to invade the campus. “People were super emotional about it,” explained one of the planners. The CMU vice president for student services began the meeting by saying that if there was a plan for a reaction of some kind, the priority should be physical safety. She was booed, and people left the room. Students were reportedly very angry I was allowed on campus at all, and reportedly thought she wasn’t concerned enough about student mental health and safety.
Two days later, on March 12, the student-body president sent a message to the campus to say that the thought of my coming “makes many of us if not all of us feel unsafe, unheard, and unwelcome.” She urged students to join in the plan to fight off my “hateful ideas.”
There followed “many long days, hours-long meetings,” and the result was the festival of beanbags and burgers. As organizer Alex Austin explained, “When something so ridiculous and egregious happens, it’s on you as people who view themselves in the morally right position to respond in the correct way.”
President Marshall gave an interview to the Denver ABC affiliate and claimed my ideas are “easy to defeat . . . with just a little bit of discussion,” so I emailed him an invitation to take the stage after my talk and explain why I am wrong. I reminded him that he lists courage as one of the defining virtues of the “human scale university” he says he is building. I copied several people on the email, including the student-body president, who wrote back to say Mr. Marshall could not join me because he would be with the moon-bouncers. She said he had “accepted a better invitation to attend a better event focused on love, dignity, and TRUE courage.”
I made a video ridiculing Mr. Marshall’s climbdown. Instead of encouraging students to expand their minds by grappling with unfamiliar ideas, he was joining the show meant to draw students away from my talk and keep them ignorant. I suggested that the campus retire its campus mascot, the maverick — a maverick is a rebel or a dissenter — and switch to the “herd-animal moo-cow.”
Meanwhile, flyers were going up around campus denouncing me, denouncing the club that invited me, and advertising the “campus unity party.”
Mr. Applebaugh, the student who invited me, got a front-page dox in the school paper, and had to face down a hostile takeover of the Western Culture Club. Twenty new members tried to join, but failed in their plan to vote him out, dissolve the club, and cancel my talk. The group’s faculty advisor faced widespread scorn.
A student set up a Change.org petition to pressure President Marshall to cancel my speech. It accused me of white supremacy and fascism, and said I made “many of our students feel unsafe and threatened.” It got 1,221 signatures, and comments such as: “Fuck white supremacists.” “President John Marshall should be removed from his position, immediately.” “When has history ever been on the side of people who just rolled over to nazi fucks?” “Fuck Nazis.”
A CMU student published an open letter to President Marshall, accusing him of “spineless cowardice,” first, for letting me speak and, second, for refusing personally to “demonstrate the virtues of meeting hate speech with better speech.”
Another student wrote that allowing me to speak was not a free-speech issue because: “Taylor is a fascist. He edits a fascist publication, he is friends with fascists, he has hosted fascist conferences and events, and he regularly uses fascist talking points. The only sensible conclusion to come to is that Taylor is a fascist.”
On March 17, 10 days before my talk, the campus was vandalized with graffiti, which the police initially said were “anti-government and racist.” Eight days later, they conceded that “upon further investigation it was determined that” “No Nazis @ CMU,” “CMU Loves everyone Mashall Loves Nazis,” and “Fuck ICE Elon Trump” were “not racially motivated.”
Police arrested the vandals, a white woman, and a white man with a bun.
I flew into Grand Junction the day before my talk and found the downtown festooned with stickers announcing a Democratic Socialists of America demonstration.
The next day, I visited the campus and ran into someone who had flown all the way from Florida to hear my talk. We were sitting at an outdoor table — the one in the right foreground — when a young white man on a bicycle rode by and shouted, “Fuck you. You’re a piece of shit.”
The unity festival started before my talk, and I wanted to eat tacos and ride the mechanical bull, but campus security implored me not to. Officers escorted me into the speaking venue, checked IDs of everyone attending my talk, and put everyone though a metal detector. Five uniformed policemen stood guard while I spoke, and officers ensured a safe and unobtrusive exit. They could not have been more courteous, professional, and efficient.
The next day, I gave a video interview to the CMU teacher who runs the campus television station.
The local paper made much of the campus lovefest, but dismissed my talk in a few sentences.
The school’s event was deliberately non-political, but the Democratic Socialists of America were pure politics: “Silence is complicity,” “Eugenics is quack ‘science’,” “Fuck off, Nazi,” “Campus is safer for Nazis than minorities,” “Nazis need therapy, not microphones,” “Hate speech costs lives,” “Make racism wrong again,” and my favorite, “dump your white supremacist boyfriend.”
As you will see from press photos, the students and demonstrations were overwhelmingly white. Grand Junction is 81 percent white, 16 percent Hispanic, 1 percent Asian, with hardly any blacks. Only 4.3 percent of its 65,560 people are foreign-born, far less than the national figure of 15.8 percent. The city has good weather, a pleasant downtown, and bicycling is so popular, there are several sculptures of riders.
It is surrounded by natural beauty; Colorado National Monument is just outside the city limits. It would not be an exaggeration to call the city a whiteopia.
My reception in Grand Junction reminded me of the only time I was ever violently prevented from giving a talk — in Halifax, Canada in 2007. Halifax is still nearly 90 percent white, with a sprinkling of blacks and Asians. Whites who live with very little diversity and know the least about it are the ones who claim to love it most. So many fail to appreciate what they have until they lose it.
Colorado Mesa University TV Interviews Jared Taylor
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
English
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Same old story: White people are their own worst enemies. Of course, what do you expect in an overwhelmingly white college town? Too bad Joe Biden didn’t send planeloads and busloads of migrants to Grand Junction so they wouldn’t be so burdened by their lily whiteness.
Jared Taylor is not a “self-proclaimed white supremacist” as that flyer claims, he obviously denies such label.
However, as I’ve pointed out BEFORE, indeed (some of) his views can be RIGHTLY regarded as a form of “racial supremacism”: For instance, the inclination to “criminality” of Blacks and Mestizos – just to cite one.
D’oh! Obviously, Blacks and Mestizos are going to be more criminal when they’re enmeshed in a White Habitat – there’s a mismatch.
So,
Funnily enough,
In that sense, I should, in theory, be more “acceptable” than even Taylor himself – who’s often called names by the “Jewish Question” crowd…
Sadly, I don’t have Taylor’s rhetoric and oratory skills. But, especially, I lack his COURAGE.
Finally, point is:
I wouldn’t be treated differently by these “anti-racists” and their fellow-travellers.
Using words more carefully than Taylor does wouldn’t “give me a break” from The Left.
Why? I think Whites (and every race, in fact) deserves to be preserved.
How to do that? The most efficacious way is through Ethnic Nationalism.
(In short, I reject Multi-Racialism – naturally, for those who love it and want multi-racialism and/or multi-culturalism amidst them, BE MY GUEST.)
Taylor’s pretty mild, I’d like to give those fools a REAL right-wing tongue-lashing.
The white impulse to virtue signal is both deep-seated and ineradicable. It would be interesting if someone compiled a history showing when this plague first broke out, and tracing it up to the present. Unknown among whites before Christ, certainly there’s a tie-in with the rise of Christianity. Without a doubt it goes back a long way. The abolitionists in nineteenth century America responsible for all the bloodshed of the Civil War were intensely Christian and motivated by their mad religious fanaticism to free the niggers and then give them citizenship and equal rights. These days, their ideological descendants don’t necessarily call themselves Christians, but they are everywhere, especially on college campuses.
Love and racial brotherhood, no matter the cost! It’s what Jeebus wants, for anyone who still cares about that.
Max Applebaum? That would be strange … No. Applebaugh. That makes sense. Doubtful to be one of … eh hem, them.
Take these Democratic Socialists throw them in the exercise yard at Pelican Bay and in five minutes they’ll be begging to join the Aryan Brotherhood.
Dr. Robert Morgan wrote:
“white impulse to virtue signal is both deep-seated and ineradicable. It would be interesting if someone compiled a history showing when this plague first broke out”
It’s not a change in degree but kind. White Americans used to virtue signal about things like purity, chastity, faith, modesty, discretion – i.e, Puritan values – and those who transgressed these values were burned at the stake or, at least, shunned. (You can still find these values in somewhat mellower form among the Amish.)
But now whites virtue signal their anti-racist credentials their opposition to “racism,” “sexism,” “antisemitism,” “fascism” and “homophobia.” Should you transgress they may not literally burn you at the stake but they’ll deplatform you and destroy your career.
Why did whites’ sacred values change? It’s pretty simple: The television and the ascent of Jews as the creators of our culture. That’s what changed.
Jews don’t much care for traditional Christian values (at least when found in Christians) hence the unmitigated proliferation of trash by the likes of Jerry Springer and Howard Stern.
What Jews do care about (and fear), however, is that they may be discovered as a (pernicious) outsider and thereby forcibly detached from their host (as they’ve been many times before). This is why Jews preach “tolerance” for the “outsider” and make this into their host societies’ most sacred value with their control over the television and the prestige press. The Jews suppress their hosts’ immune system – their natural healthy defense mechanisms (which they pathologize as “xenophobia” and “nativism”) against parasites like Jews and the sundry other invasive parasites (“immigrants”) which Jews invite in on the action.
Jews, in other words, are civilizational AIDS. Jews are directly analogous to the HIV virus and the West is presently succumbing to the civilizational AIDS which the Jews have induced on it.
You’ll notice, however, that “tolerance” for the outsider is not Israel’s most sacred value (quite the opposite). Jews don’t practice what they preach when it comes to their own actual country, which tells you something about how sincere they are.
Many young men and women follow the herd because popularity is everything to them.
With the advantages of age, some will remember “that time Jared Taylor came to speak”, and find themselves critical of their youthful lack of courage to think different.
The seed has been planted. In time, it will bear fruit.
A book was published a few years ago (whose title escapes me at the moment) documenting that the extreme New England Yankee radical Abolitionists were acting predictably as descendants of the first settlers, the Puritans, who remain rather legendary for their smug self-righteousness. Considering themselves the moral conscience of the nation, they were horrified that they had become irrelevant in a rapidly growing country advancing into “the mighty age of steam,” and increasingly populated by the very servants of the Devil, Roman Catholic immigrants. They hit upon the antislavery movement that was so popular in England as the moral cause that could return them to their lost position of preeminence; but the truth is they were all but universally despised in their time. The relatively few Americans who had an opinion on slavery were primarily concerned about its corrosive effect on white men’s morals and wages, seeing the pervasive poverty, illiteracy, and high crime rate of the south as a national disgrace. Throughout his long political career, Abraham Lincoln proposed gradual compensated emancipation with repatriation to Africa as the only just solution to the problem. Smearing him as an Abolitionist fanatic is one of the worst crimes of the southern oligarchy’s fake news apparatus, which is sadly still switched full on in some circles.
It should now be apparent to you
Why Taylor avoids the “J.Q.”.
As a man filled with “hate”,
There’s enough on his plate.
He’d prefer not to bring in the Jew.
They have spent their entire lives, just as their parents did, in a Jew-run country and culture where Jew-run institutions like media, academia, entertainment, and government infuse them with self hate and tell them other races are virtuous, while White people, especially White Christians, are bad. They are no different than conditioned monkeys and while a few might be deprogrammed, most will continue down their path of self destruction and be happy doing so. Until the evil that has done this to us is removed, it will control the game.
If what you are saying is true, and it may well be, then saying and doing only what organized jewry allows you to say and do, is not likely to result in success for white advocacy other than as a permanent fringe movement.
Jared Taylor is a national treasure. I am surprised he hasn’t been conveniently murdered in a home invasion.
Speaking of, I notice that Kevin Givden hasn’t published a black-on-white murder report since September 2024. I am guessing he got the that’s-a-nice-family-you-got-there-it’d-be-a-shame-if-something-happened-to-them treatment.
Observator: “Throughout his long political career, Abraham Lincoln proposed gradual compensated emancipation with repatriation to Africa as the only just solution to the problem. ”
On the contrary, Lincoln claimed to be going in that direction when he endorsed the idea of giving citizenship and the vote to negroes.
Some historians (and I mean actual historians, not the likes of PCR or Thomas DiLorenzo, who as far as I know have never even mentioned this speech) report that John Wilkes Booth was in attendance and vowed on the spot to kill Lincoln because of it, saying “That means nigger citizenship. … That is the last speech he will ever give.”
John Wilkes Booth was a great racial patriot, and he gave Lincoln the reward he so richly deserved. A bullet in the head!
Observator: “… [T]he truth is [abolitionists] were all but universally despised in their time.”
No, abolitionist Christian religious fanatics such as Harriet Beecher Stowe, the author of Uncle Tom’s Cabin, and her brother, Rev. Henry Ward Beecher, were very popular. Uncle Tom’s Cabin was a best seller, second only to the Bible. The anti-slavery movement in N. America grew out of America’s first and second Great Awakenings, the Christian mass insanity wholly responsible for giving niggers “equal rights”.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_awakening
Without such religious fanaticism, it’s hard to see how the Civil War would ever have happened.
The loathing young whites–and the rest of humanity–feel for white American Christians is the fault of white American Christians. There are more Zionists in Texas than there are Jews in the world.
Your sentence structure is a bit choppy but I think I know what you are trying to say. That’s fine if you want to blame the brainwashed, especially those who since childhood have never known much other than brainwashing, instead of the people doing the brainwashing, but having grown up in that environment, it took me awhile to overcome it and see reality. Those of us who did overcome it, are definitely a clear minority of the White population.
That or they could go to Compton, East St. Louis, South Chicago, Baltimore and see if they’ll still enjoy that vision of “diversity”.
That’s terrible Jed. Those Honkees Jewed you.
No you wouldn’t, or that’s what you’d be doing.
I lived in Canada for 16 years. Canada does not have one single truly conservative politician. The “Conservative” Party of Canada is well to the left of the Democratic Party in America. There is not one genuinely conservative media outlet in all of Canada. As with all other Western nations, Canada is under the stinking foot of the Jew. That means that Canadians are globalists, Zionists, socialists, multiculturalists, pro-abortion, pro-LGBTQ, Godless and anti-free speech. Therefore, it is no surprise that Jared Taylor — an ardent admirer of Jews, ironically — is not welcome in that so-called country.
In a TV interview, Jared said his solution was to have absolute freedom of association in the US. But you can’t have that without absolute freedom of exclusion.
The question is: How do you exclude without running afoul of the law? The only way you can do it is to live in such a way that nonwhites would not want to live with you.
The Amish are a good example of that. Most nonwhites would not want to live like the Amish. But then again, most whites wouldn’t either.
Ironically, another example would be lily white Grand Junction Colorado and Colorado Mesa University. The whites there are into things nonwhites aren’t particularly interested in, such as mountain biking and skiing. White virtue signaling is precisely proportional to the extent to which the virtue signaling whites are able to legally exclude nonwhites.
Grand Junction, CO: Asian 0.12%; American Indian or Alaska Native 0.18%; black 0.83%; Hispanic 19.73% (almost half of that is “white Hispanic”); “other” 2.02%; white (non-Hispanic) 77%.
Colorado Mesa University students: Asian 1.52%; American Indian or Alaska Native 0.54%; black 1.76%, Hispanic (including “white Hispanic”) 20.7%; two or more races 4.32%; Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islanders 0.4%; white (non-Hispanic) 66%.
Want white? Aim for smaller towns, rural, “great outdoors” type places, particularly in the mountains where there’s plenty of snow in the winter and lots of “white” recreational opportunities: snow shoeing, ice fishing, fly fishing, mountain biking, motocross, skiing, snowboarding, hiking, waterskiing, horseback riding, camping, hunting, windsurfing, bungee jumping, kayaking, rock climbing, backpacking, skydiving, etc.
Look for lots of brewpubs, sushi restaurants, “farm to table” restaurants, wineries, farmers markets, organic food, crystal shops, New Age spirituality, drumming circles, yoga studios, Pilates studios, indie film festivals, dude ranches, etc. (of course, keep in mind that most of the whites will be antiracist virtue-signaling libtards).
Or you can “turn back the clock” by moving to a place mirroring the demographics of the USA circa 1950 such as The Villages in Florida. Even though you might be too young to live there, I believe anyone can hang out and eat and shop there.
Some Whiteopias: Bishop, California; Truckee, California; San Luis Obispo, California; Lake Tahoe, California; Marin County, California; Northern California (far north); The Villages, Florida; Grand Junction, Colorado; almost anywhere in Montana, Idaho, Oregon (not Portland or Eugene), Utah, Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Alaska, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma, Indiana, Michigan (Upper Peninsula); Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine.
anon[417]: “Why did whites’ sacred values change? It’s pretty simple: The television and the ascent of Jews as the creators of our culture. That’s what changed.”
See my reply at #14, above.
There were barely any Jews in America at the time of the Civil War, when white Christian Americans in the North virtue signaled so strongly their opposition to racism that they were willing to kill tens of thousands of their Christian brothers in the South over that question. Then, in a fit of mass religious insanity, they very calmly and deliberately made the niggers into citizens equal to themselves, and gave them the vote.
Also, note: They did it without television, internet, or mass “education” — save perhaps for the Bible.
Taylor never speaks up for the Palestinians who are targeted for destruction by Jewish Power just like the white race is.
All said and done, Taylor is a white cuck to Jews.
He’s still holding out for the grand deal with Jews: “We whites will support the total erasure of the Palestinians and total Zionist control over Palestine and the Middle East, and in return, we pray and hope and you awesome Jews will look upon us whites more kindly and spare us from your wrath.”
As such, despite Taylor’s courageous stance on many matters, he is ultimately a cuck who will not confront the biggest threat to the white race.
Much of non-white hostility toward whites owes to Jewish control of media and academia. Jews fan anti-white flames, just like they fan anti-Palestinian flames.
But cuck dog Taylor still won’t connect the dots.
While diversity is problematic, it’s especially problematic cuz Jews direct diversity against whites.
You are a cuck too, the only difference is that you complain about it constantly like a leper exhibiting his sores to passersby on a pavement. I can’t imagine a more powerless loudmouth than you.
University students have always been sheep. They don’t even know who Taylor is.
Keep in mind these brats will be working for the agencies as soon as they graduate.
Why not? They’re already following orders from agents. This has been going on since FDR communize colleges in the 1930s.
We got no power, true.
The only power we got is to speak the truth.
And Taylor won’t even do that.
Very interesting point of view.
Importing slaves was a brillant Idea only for some.
Fair enough. I get culturally triggered about respect to elders sometimes, usually with regard to Mr Taylor and Mr Unz on TUR. Afrikaners are supposed to call older people uncle or aunt as a sign of respect where I grew up. Old habits. I do sympathise with the Palestinians.
I may as well add something about white and black, old and new.
For the old, an interview with Jan Breytenbach, who was a founder member of the old South African special forces and a legend:
Video Link
For the new, after about two months of being held hostage in their base, permission for SA soldiers to leave the Democratic Republic of the Congo has been negotiated with their captors:
Video Link
“Is the enemy weak? Attack him.
Is the enemy strong? Avoid him.”
— “The Art of War” by Sun Tzu
Three simple words.
Pathological xenophilic altruism.
Lincoln never settled on repatriation, just the opposite. He was off and on about repatriation before ultimately deciding against it after being convinced by Frederick Douglass that blacks deserved to stay in America. There was also a test colony in Panama that failed miserably, half the blacks starved to death and Lincoln sent the Navy to bring the survivors BACK to the US.
You very often see northerners in right-wing circles with this weird bone to pick with the South try to rehabilitate Lincoln as a political figure with this idea that he was on the verge of deporting all the slaves back to Africa, if only he hadn’t been assassinated. It is completely ahistorical, but it doesn’t stop them from fanatically repeating the lie every chance they get.
Christian zionism is a tiny slice of Christianity. Maybe 5-10 percent of the Christians in the US. They get a lot of press for obvious reasons. The overwhelming majority of Americans, whether religious or not, support Israel. The Moslems in Congress have stated they support Israel. There are no nationally elected politicians in the US who haven’t stated they support the state of Israel, making them zionists. Young Whites don’t hate themselves because they’re Christian, when this country was more devoutly Christian we had segregation and law and order. They hate themselves because they’ve abandoned their grandparents Faith.
Bravo! Best joke I’ve heard on Unz.com. Succint, true, funny. More of this, please! Never mind any whinging begrudger comments.
Ah. That explains rampaging Japanese-American street thugs. I knew there was an explanation.
Races are different;
So, they behave differently;
Nature doesn’t make “equal” – in Nature, if something happens to be equal, it is by chance.
(Maybe Blacks, in some sense, will always be “more criminal”, due to, according to Psychology, for instance, being uncooperative and defiant, just to cite a few, are markers that predict criminality – however, on the other hand, they also predict genius! It’s multi-faceted.)
Point is:
I just think it’s unfair to say, “Blacks are more criminal than Whites”, to the Blacks who live in America or Europe, whose Laws are designed to the White Race. In fact, even Blacks in Africa, to some degree, have had their minds colonised! I can only hope that the real anti-colonialists in such countries win and Africanise everything to the core! (But that’s up to the Blacks, not me, to decide what they’ll do in their countries.)
In sum,
Actions deemed infractions or misdemeanours, let’s say, “jaywalking” or what-not, came from the White mind – would the Black mind (in pristine state, not under any external influences) handle that differently? Possibly.
See?
That’s what I meant with: “Gotta be more nuanced when talking about Race and Criminality”; surely, murder will always be a crime, it’s universal – but, much of what’s “criminal” is a Social Construct. Of course, many (most?) components of Culture come from Biology – let’s hope what governs a Culture (Black or White; Red, Yellow or Brown) comes from its very Biology, not someone else’s.
Conservatives say,
Racialists respond,
Likewise…
For example,
Could what’s deemed “truancy” or “delinquency” in Japan or Eton just be in the range of “average Black behaviour”?
I don’t think it’s fair to punish a Black over that, at all – when s/he can’t even grasp how s/he’s a “delinquent” as s/he merely acted as s/he normally would.
See?
That’s mismatch I referred to!
.
.
.
Side-note:
Regarding my 1st comment in this thread: might seem I tone down my beliefs to appear “acceptable” – to reiterate: I do not do that; rather, I speak what I believe it’s true.
Amusingly, this used to be known as the ‘but he’s just a crazy nigger’ defense in Southern courts. It was a potentially effective plea for leniency.
I’d agree that it’s valid — but the converse is that we can hardly extend to blacks the same liberties we grant to others. Should blacks, for example, be permitted to possess firearms? Would we want them going to school with our daughters? Would it be reasonable for cops to stop black adolescents in non-black neighborhoods?
That’s changing. I don’t think that it’s ‘overwhelming’ any more.
…
In fact, a majority of US adults now have a negative view of Israel.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/04/08/how-americans-view-israel-and-the-israel-hamas-war-at-the-start-of-trumps-second-term/sr_25-04-08_us-views-of-israel_4/
This kind of polling often reveals how stupid and inconsistent people are. You can present questions in a poll where 80% of the responders say or imply they disagree with Democrat policies yet Democrats still get half the vote and win elections. When we decide to let Israel function on their own without our assistance and protection then I will be encouraged. Right now we have the America First President whose top priority it seems is still Israel and the Zionists seem to have as much control over our politicians as ever even if some people are starting to see the situation for what it is.
That’s why, I think, Segregation (Jim Crow, Apartheid) is utterly bad; Separation is the way to go.
So,
While that doesn’t happen, what to do?
(We’re talking about: “Integration of differents”, basically.)
I deal with “ideal” issues (someone has got to), down-to-earth ones aren’t my Department.
Similarly,
The question of actual Superiority (I don’t think there is): But, anyway, that’s up to philosophers.
But – let’s be real – sadly, they won’t investigate that. Cowards!
BTW,
Dealing philosophically with “Integration of differents” is much harder than dealing with deviancy.
If a White American is a deviant – say, his IQ is 80 or whatever. We can ethically approach this in manner X; but “manner X” wouldn’t be ethical for a US Black, as this IQ range for him, is not deviant at all, but rather, totally normal.
I fail to see how this can be applauded.
Either by ‘separation’ you mean Jim Crow but labelled differently — which is of course meaningless hypocrisy — or you mean blacks should be left to their own devices –which is to condemn them to Haiti minus the foreign aid.
That’s no better than abandoning your pug in the woods and telling yourself that you’re setting him ‘free.’ Most of them will just die. The rest will live lives of fear and impoverishment. At least have the honesty to just gas them yourself.
I think Jim Crow is the most practicable, humane solution that doesn’t require us to cast ourselves as martyrs. We’ll keep an eye on blacks — but separate schools, please.
Nothing is more “white supremacist” than the pro-tranny cult, which is particularly strong in Colorado. Note that the recent big march in Ottawa protesting teaching this crap in the schools was a hell of a lot browner than the government they were protesting, even given obvious Uncle Toms such as Jagmeet Singh.
The pro-gay cult which preceded it– damn it, you will shut up and bake that cake, or lose your Colorado license!– was also white supremacist. The “same-sex ‘marriage’” map of the world is essentially a racial map.
As long as organized jewry exists, Whites will never be allowed to segregate. In fact, most Whites will not want separation because they have been conditioned to believe racism and apartheid/segregation is much worse than having their society destroyed by savages. Therefore segregation must first be from organized jewry because until that is accomplished and their power over the culture is destroyed, there will be no segregation from the Negro.
I won’t say I’m inclined to agree — actually, I’d rather not agree.
But I’m forced to agree; blacks as an intolerable problem are ultimately a symptom rather than the disease itself. Indeed, as I’ve pointed out, those black leaders who have been more or less independent of Jewish influence — Booker T. Washington, Marcus Garvey, Malcolm X — have all been at best only secondarily interested in integration, etc. Their thing was always black economic development — and I don’t think anyone could really object to that.
It has been the Jewish-sponsored movements that have pushed the integration/’civil rights’ schtick: the NAACP, Martin Luther King, Black Bullshit Matters. If you don’t want blacks in your child’s school, your problem is more with Jews than with blacks themselves.
“Intensely Christian”? Unitarianism isn’t intensely Christian, but its Abolitionist demonstrators tried to use Christian themes to support their drives toward socialist revolution.
Twodees Partain: ““Intensely Christian”? Unitarianism isn’t intensely Christian, but its Abolitionist demonstrators tried to use Christian themes to support their drives toward socialist revolution.”
They weren’t intensely Christian but used Christian themes? You’re not making any sense. Why would they use Christian themes if they weren’t Christians? What do you think they were? Buddhists? LOL
Unitarians may not drink your particular brand of Jeebus juice, but they’re Christians nonetheless. And not only that, they managed to convince all the rest of the Christians to fight a ruinous, fratricidal war that freed the niggers. Then, in a fit of Christ-inspired madness, Christian American white men made them citizens equal to whites, and gave them the vote.