Sometimes the little words are the most important:

No idea? I have an idea. You have an idea. Genes will show that Jews are smart, East Asians have good impulse control, Amerindians get diabetes, and Africans – well, they behave like Africans.

The self-styled “race realists” who increasingly dominate this website haven’t much to say about Big War, Tech, Sick, Finance, Squelch, or other institutionalized [mis]behavior.

Is none of that genetically determinable?

Farmers are cannibals. That’s why brain volume have decrease from Neanderthals and Cro Magnon.
A Genocide of the most sensitive and intelligent, to form a cattle. Witch burning.
A cattle, that cant control their blood thirst, and that’s why Newtons laws are not valid in North America.

Farmers ARE con-men. They have produce the feed working slave cast.
Agriculture was a catastrophe in worse conditions, and made humans a cattle.
It have make the countryside a hostile environment, made the opportunity for the parasite state, for parasite church with no connection whatsoever to reality, parasite bureaucracy.
School ! People which cant do anything of value stay long in school, and become parasites.
Opportunity for a death cult. Psychopaths ARE smart. Beyond your imagination.

Egypt’s obsession with cadaver are replaced by a obsession to produce cadavers, plenty of raw material for the death cult.

You can see it in the living dead, ruling the island of death and destruction.
Or in the Genocide organization “UN”, mass murdering in the hospitals.
You have get “progress” backwards.
The black men which sent samples of a goat and a Papya to test for “Covid” was progress,because of that they had to die.

David Reich wrote his book to pre-empt accusations that his findings are racist: above all he does not want to lose funding for his research.

Big War, Tech, Sick, Finance

These topics are frequently covered on this site. If you can give us a genetic angle on these subjects, please do.

You’re either some kind of AI bot or a real psycho.

First, Jared Taylor does not mention the very relevant fact that David Reich is jewish – why?

Second, this is absurd – early farmers’ “diet changed from mostly meat to grain crops”. All the evidence we have says that for at least millions of years and up until the last century or so, the human diet has been mostly whole plant food.

The bro-science that follows from JT’s wrong assumption is equally absurd – that a high-carb diet is unhealthy. The exact opposite is true: because we evolved as foragers, mostly eating whole plant foods, whole plant foods are the healthiest for us, i.e., potatoes, grains, beans, vegetables and fruit.

In fact, because of our modern food abundance and our choice to mostly eat the tastiest food (animal and highly processed food) rather than the healthiest food (whole plant food), about 80% of all deaths in the West are caused by our food.

If you’re in any doubt about what is our healthiest food, see probably the best nutritional science reporting in the world at nutritionfacts.org, or watch the film Forks Over Knives at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZGs0XsS_lI.
Video Link

There are tons and tons of anti-war arguments.
…A “race realist” one would be: War is dysgenic, say ‘No!’ to War!

Big War, Tech, Sick, Finance

Did you intend to leave off Squelch? That takes self-censorship to a new level.

If you can give us a genetic angle on these subjects, please do.

Let’s await an expert’s explanation of why the Diffident Right only punches down.

Do you not see that stoking & soothing disaffected whites while giving a big, fat pass to an Establishment that survives by keeping people distracted, divided & conquered complements identity politics like BLM, making HBD, in effect, the other blade of the scissors?

Among Reich´s somewhat counterintuitive findings was that selection for
intelligence markers really kicked of with the Neolithic Revolution
i.e. monogamy (!!!).

One has to almost have pity – it´s like watching an intelligent apologist
having to defend the immaculate conception 😁

Sorry, apparently used the wrong REPLY button.

Please see #8.

I’m in no doubt that 12,000 years isn’t long enough to change omnivores into herbivores.

As a former fatass who was at risk of diabetes, I can safely assert that there isn’t a single fatass out there who wouldn’t benefit from a significant and consistent reduction in their carbohydrate intake.

Thanks to “bro science,” I’m in better shape in my 50s than most Americans in their 20s.

As a rule of thumb a 0.1% selective advantage becomes prevalent in 200 generations
(3-4ka in this case); lactose tolerance and alcohol dehydrogenase are much more
advantageous (of course becoming true – i.e. not panda – herbivore would require
major changes in teeth and digestive tract; zero chance).

giving a big, fat pass to Establishment

Who is doing that? It is a natural extrapolation of the core argument of Taylor’s work (viz. “HBD is important and ignored at the West’s peril”) that the institutions of the West become corrupt and are degraded in direct relation to the extent to which HBD is ignored. Taylor would argue that the means of confronting the corruption you’re indicating would be a widespread acceptance of HBD and a cultural exploration of race-realism with a view toward adapting or reconstituting the institutions in favor of the needs of Westerners (whites).

It’s a lot tougher to explain the rapid spread of blue eyes, which didn’t exist 15,000 years ago…They don’t confer any significant health benefit, so I would guess that they increase sexual attraction in a major way…..

That

the institutions of the West become corrupt and are degraded in direct relation to the extent to which HBD is ignored

sounds like it was written by someone looking through the other end of Ta-Nahesi Coates’ telescope — anything wrong with institutional America is due to the suppression of whites.

AFAIK, none of the HBD writers on this website has ever spoken out substantially against

• Uncle Sam’s destruction of MENA or Ukraine/Russia

• the corporate consolidation of internet and other media

• the COVID dempanic and its exploitation by government and the pharmaceutical industry

• the financialization of our economy

• the persecution of dissidents as purported “antisemites” or “agents of foreign powers”

Can you cite some specific examples?

Please stick to writing in your native language, then have it translated to English. Your English isn’t intelligible.

Have DNA for all humans which lived 15000 years ago be searched for the genes for blue eyes ?
Humans have the biggest gen pole for no health benefits, sickness, of all mammals.
It should not be there at all, if it was not something fishy with her DNA…
As I remember, Horses, whales, elephants, moles and hyenas all have their sexual attraction spiced with a hymen…

Darwin is wrong. There exist no transforming of species to other species, no defined direction of “progress”, and no absolute use and meaning of every organ and special function.

There existed maybe a “Ewe” from which all mitochondrial DNA have come.
Its highly suspect 😉
“Blue eyed” have two meanings.

Lloyd Pye was absolutely on track to something.

You are a Philistin.

I doubt you understand the meaning ( and nuance ) of this term, as you’re obviously not Western.
You are intrusive, disruptive, although the MAJORITY of authors on this site share your views.
Why do you invade the few spaces where you’re not welcome? I personally see a genetic reason ( non European)

After many years of ignoring and following incorrect theories, for example, about the non-existent ‘Indo-Europeans’ (who were neither Indo nor Europeans), Reich’s laboratory began to investigate the roots of civilization and culture in the right place, not because it established new facts, but because someone else would took that place and destroyed their credibility.

I have written more than once that the cornerstone of world historical falsifications, the so-called mainstream (Vatican-Zio-panzer) theory, is about the arrival of some so-called Slavs, who came from nowhere to Europe (the Balkans).

In the end, they established that (at least some) were natives of Europe after all, although it will be a long way to spill that into the mainstream and school textbooks. The text is about the existence of races. Has anyone perhaps deduced from the text where the white race originated?

Or maybe someone guessed indirectly where the cradle of the oldest civilization, culture and language was, which is absolutely unknown fact, not only to the general population but also to the vast majority of unz readers.

How is it possible for (white) civilization to survive if it still does not know where its roots or the beginnings of culture are.

Gerry, btw and unrelated to the above comment, do you know who the real Philistines were? For example, Goliath and Dalila? There are not many people who know this and you will be the second one on the unz who does.

Wrong. In addition to the ad hominem, is that an inverted bandwagon fallacy you’ve deployed there, Gerald?

It looks like you may have arrived only recently. My contributions here go back to 2015, before the gradual replacement of TUR’s worthwhile, wide ranging content with a racebait outlet mall began. You’re apparently unable to refute those who want to argue how that not only degrades the website, but actually serves the Establishment. (If you feel that your “space” is being violated, put me on your IGNORE list.)

Lowering my carb intake to almost zero cured me of a life-long battle with several severe skin conditions. I’ve no idea what humans were eating in the stone age but going Keto has given me a life I didn’t think was possible.

Also, I found it ironic that you described meat and highly processed food as being the most tasty. I took much more enjoyment from eating a plant-carb diet but my body just can’t take it. I eat tons of meat because it makes me better.

What a laugh.

“For at least millions of years the human diet blah blah…”

But “humans”, as Homo sapiens,

“began exhibiting behavioral modernity about 160,000–60,000 years ago. For most of their history, humans were nomadic hunter-gatherers. The Neolithic Revolution, which began in Southwest Asia around 13,000 years ago…” Wikipedia

so we haven’t even been around anything like a million years.

and then this howler:

“whole plant foods are the healthiest for us, i.e., potatoes, grains, beans, vegetables and fruit.”

Until those were domesticated they were tiny, insignificant things. And, both beans and grains need to be cooked to be digestible.

“the human diet has been mostly whole plant food…”

So, you believe that people ate the “whole plant” of a potato?

“Irish potato leaves are not edible as they can be toxic….”

“about 80% of all deaths in the West are caused by our food…”

Where in the world did you find this statistic?

Typical liberal comment. Nonsensical, illogical assumptions which will be used as the basis for condemning those who disagree or who lead different lifestyles. And militantly voting for policies which fall in line with these conceits.

Are you Indian?

“Ewe” = even in Indian English = the female of the sheep, and therefrom comes all our mitochondrial DNA ???

Translated to English :
gen pole = gene pool ? among the most understandable 2 words here

“Something fishy with her DNA” ?!??❓❓❓‼️‼️

“Darwin was wrong”-
WRONG, DARWIN WAS RIGHT

… the “sexual attraction is spiced (?) with the hymen” ?!? +and not blue eyes ?

Unintelligible gibberish! Learn to talk/write American English.

His/her/its awkward fractured error-filled English may be because he/she/it is low caste Pajeet Indian.

Or he/she/it may have “the dementia”, as the Indians will say it.

Of course human evolution is fast and deep…as I’ve mentioned to my sons on more than one occasion,

“…200 years from now, every human alive will have ancestors that did not succumb to “glowing rectangle addiction” in the 21st century”😂

Humans have always been herbivores. We can eat animal food (and highly-processed food), just as deer can eat birds (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQOQdBLHrLk), but it isn’t good for us.

You sound like a keto nut, in which case you’re in increasingly terrible shape and you’ll find that out soon enough.

Going keto can have partially positive effects to begin with – for most people losing weight is beneficial, and for a tiny percentage of people (such as yourself, maybe) who have allergies to some plant foods it can improve/remove their allergic reactions.

But keto, apart from being extremely difficult to stick to, is usually a death sentence in the medium- to long-term – you’ll probably die on keto from heart problems and suchlike much earlier than if you’d just kept to the typical, very crappy Western diet.

I’m not against using a keto diet in the short term to lose weight, but if want a healthy life and a long life, it’s vital to get off keto and preferably onto whole plant foods. If you’re allergic to some plant foods, then it’s best to test which plant foods you’re allergic to by gradually re-introducing them to your diet.

Okay, I’ll rephrase the sentence you had a problem with: “For at least millions of years, our ancestors’ diet has been mostly plant food”.

You’re wrong about whole plant food not being in sufficient quantity and not being edible to us until after the relevant plant varieties were domesticated. Realise that there used to be only thousands of hominins in the past in the whole world. Also, learn that we’ve used fire for about a million years.

And before we started using fire we also had, as I said, a mostly plant food diet, e.g., see the article at https://www.cmnh.org/pnas2015 which talks about recent scientific research:

“The study involved an analysis of fossil teeth of early human ancestors found in the Woranso-Mille study area of Ethiopia. The results show that in early hominins the shift from a diet based on trees and shrubs to one that included grass-based foods took place about 3.8 million years ago.”

So, we added grasses to our mostly trees-and-shrubs diet nearly 4 million years ago – sounds like a whole plant food diet to me! 😀

In fact, if you look at the figures, humans STILL eat a largely plant food diet – more than 3/4 of our calories come from plant food even today, see the excellent National Geographic magazine pie charts at: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/what-the-world-eats/.

Unfortunately, that largely plant food diet is increasingly highly-processed plant food, especially in the richer, Western countries, which isn’t healthy.

And sadly, all Western countries and all European countries have an average BMI of over 25 (fat), and America is moving towards an average BMI of over 30 by around 2040 (obese), none of which is healthy. Apart from being inherently healthiest, whole plant foods have the other great advantage that they are low-calorie/high-volume; thus, eating only whole plant foods usually guarantees a healthy weight even when you eat as much as you want to.

You exhibited some (fake?) confusion over what “whole plant food” means. Whole plant food is plant food which is unprocessed or minimally processed, e.g., wholemeal rice is whole plant food but not the usual white rice, olives are whole plant food but not cold-pressed, virgin olive oil. For further details, see https://www.forksoverknives.com/what-to-eat/ or https://www.forksoverknives.com/how-tos/plant-based-primer-beginners-guide-starting-plant-based-diet/.

The statistic about 80% of deaths in the West being caused by our food seems to be about right to me. It comes from Professor T. Colin Campbell, coiner of the term, “plant-based diet” in 1980, and author of the world’s biggest-ever nutritional-science study, The China Study (1980s-90s). In 1990, the New York Times called The China Study “the Grand Prix of epidemiology”. I saw Campbell’s 80%-of-deaths-caused-by-our-food estimate in a video he was in, but it’s fairly likely he elaborates on it in his excellent website, which is at https://nutritionstudies.org/.

Finally, it was foolish of you to assume I’m a “liberal”, I’m far from being what the self-described “high-Tory”, Professor Edward Dutton, who writes for this website, calls a “spiteful mutant”.

Well, it’s been over 4 years now, but granted I do have to take some months off every so often because the weight loss is almost too effective. In the meantime I’ve only become stronger and healthier, so the ‘terrible shape’ is certainly procrastinating.

I’m growing my own greens and herbs, getting plenty of good sunlight, cultivating my own kefir, taking apple cider vinegar in my water each day, and most importantly air-frying delicious seafood on a regular basis… does that really sound unhealthy or ‘nutty’ to any reasonable person?

There’s less than zero reason to believe that I would have been better off staying overweight and sedentary and eating carby foods all the time. Even your bestselling doctor/salesman would have to agree with that much.

I recall having read many years ago that Japanese soldiers during WW2 were capable of sustaining themselves on Pacific Islands in a way that American GIs were not because while the GI was tied to the supply chain going back to Kansas, the Japanese soldier had been taught to follow monkeys around in the jungle and observe what they ate; if a monkey could digest it, then, most likely a human could as well. So, Japanese soldiers could possibly be more self-sufficient and live and fight as guerrillas.

Your ‘fellow Americans’.

Why do usual suspects always beat up old people, women and disabled people? pic.twitter.com/fL7rbnKoXe

— RadioGenoa (@RadioGenoa) September 30, 2024

Yes, in any war the bravest and best die first – perhaps sometimes also the most naive.

So we know that the last five thousand years we can stipulate, but beyond that it’s a gimmick.
So ladies and gentlemen, please go back to the Bible and learn the truth about mankind, where do we come from and where we are going.

His/her/its awkward fractured error-filled English may be because he/she/it is low caste Pajeet Indian.

Or he/she/it may have “the dementia”, as the Indians will say it.

Or, alarmed by the increasing attention to TUR, TPTB may be unleashing an arsenal of AI gibberish generators to gum up the comments.

Given Ron’s notoriously generous moderation standards (i.e. effectively nil) this would be an easy target indeed.

You tell ’em bro! You are right. Ditch the phones.

Video Link

I read Who We Are and How We got Here several months ago. Must read.

Just as Taylor is allergic to Naming the Jew, Reich did not mention Africa in his book. That would haven been over the top.

Joe Webb

Ancient DNA study now can go back hundreds of thousands of years.

You are an idiot .

Joe Webb

Every Jewish “scientist” from Einstein to David Reich proved to be a fraud and a bigoted racist. No one knows or dares to mention that Einstein was one of a few violent Satans who were advocating a nuclear holocaust.

You should write in Arogornish and let Google translate do the rest.

As for genetics, you don’t need to be a geneticist to see that there are mental and physical behavioral differences between humans and sub human mutations. They walk among us and are in our face, they burn, loot, murder and rape with impunity. Western nation states are the only ones that allow this sub human behavior to manifest itself within the general population.

Jared Taylor will probably never admit who is Jewish; he knows better. Furthermore, David Reich has never mentioned (that I can find) that Ashkenazi Jews are almost all converts of the 8th and 9th century and have little credibility in pontificating that they are related to the Hebrews of the bible.

Your analysis of the food types for humans is incorrect. This can be seen with respect to Native Americans when the settlers arrived. Many Native Americans of North America (USA and Canada) of the East Coast with colder climates were quite tall and large people often in the 5’10” range or above. This is due to much of their diets being meat (deer, moose etc.). This is one of the reasons they were constantly fighting over hunting and fishing areas. Most of the Europeans were smaller, many slightly over 5’1”.

This is easily seen in the size of Native Americans in the South West and in different areas of South America who were primarily farmers. The Irish were fairly short due to their diets which were mostly vegetables. Eating meat and fat increase your size. Just look at Asians who are second and third generations are usually much taller than the parents.

One other point about the accuracy of these genetic studies and that is they are not as accurate as some of these people believe because what cause genes to turn on and off is much more complex than they think.

Genes will show that Jews are smart, …

Lol. Stopped reading there. Taylor pretends to be ‘scientific’ yet ignores the data: (1) jews of Israel have an average IQ of 92 AND (2) young jews of Israel have low scores in PISA tests of educational achievement.

Perhaps Taylor is a crypto jewphile composing an entire ‘essay’ just to write the quoted sentence and then repeat a common jew slogan.

Adam has never heard of Anti nutrients. Lots of vegetables and fruits are either mildly toxic or have a detrimental effect on stomach metabolism and overall metabolism. Spinach should not be eaten at all – or overcook it to the max to knock out the anti nutrients.
If kidney stones are your thing – eat raw spinach.
Adam sounds like yet another vegan propagandist. l have nothing against vegans per se – but they never do actual diet research. Want to have low protein and amino acid counts? – go vegan.
Yes one can make up the dietary shortfalls with supplementation – but vegans are too busy denying their diet has any issues

I have seen accounts of research which purportedly have shown that how many calories are consumed is the key factor both in obesity and in the levels of various physiological indicator, not what categories of food are eaten.

What I think is the great problem is that people do not realize that when they eat multiple courses in one meal, they are eating multiple meals. Consider a meal consisting of soup, a salad possibly with cheese in it covered with only an oil and vinegar dressing, a big fat potato with butter or some other goop on it, a good sized serving of dead farm animal with a sauce on it, some kind of cooked vegetable and some form of bread. Then dessert.

The soup, salad and potato is a whole meal. Or start with the dead farm animal, go on to the vegetable, have a little bread and then the dessert.

You get a dinner like that, just eat half of it and save the other half for breakfast. You’ll still be overeating a little.

We’re trying to eat a diet which might have been necessary for people who did farm work or heavy work all day. We don’t need it.

As someone who has lost as much as 60 pounds and has a permanent weight loss of 40 pounds, I think I have an opinion of some value and some level of informedness. The way you lose weight is to eat less. Human beings are omnivores. A human being can live on many different types of diets. Someone can live on a high carb diet but they have to not eat other high-calorie foods in quantity. A human being can live on mostly meat, but then they have to stay away from carbs. If you want to eat a food pyramid diet, you have to eat small portions because you are eating a lot of types of food.

I have found out lately, because I want to hang on to my cash for as long as possible, that keeping very little food in the house is a good way to cut down on food consumption. I think seeing less food just leads to eating smaller portions and eating less things together. But there is something else too. People just naturally get tired of eating the same thing all the time. Less food also means a lesser variety of foods available. With a lesser variety, you’re just less motivated to want to eat a lot. That’s my experience anyway.

White War I, White War II, Slav (white) against Slav leading to a possible WWIII, and the Russian Slavs got slants fighting for them!!! Yeah Mr. Whitey sho is a smart rascal!

δ¹³C(SMOW) is not really diagnostic (at least not solid enough to build an
argument for rabbit feed upon) in this case; the only sure signs for grass diet are
actinomycosis of the dentale (e.g. in cave bears) and specific kinds of wear
(“polished” enamel).
– C4 plants (“grasses”) evolved and spread in the Tertiary because the CO2 fell
below the optimum for leafy (“C3”) plants; their metabolism is more efficient,
giving a different isotope signature.
So if our ancestors simply got fed up with all the stinking nuts and berries and got
off the trees for some aromatic ruminant carrion, the isotopes would say “grass”-
a bit like the missionary regarding it as “kinda” success that his flock now eat only
fishermen on fridays 😜
Alternatively it is just a new date for climate change (= savanna formation by early
ice age) which is not exactly new (why else would baboons have the same idea at
the same time?)

Still, it´s an interesting result – like the discovery a few years ago of human
endosymbionts capable of digesting cellulose; keep the faith 😁

Good quote.
As for the conncetion between genes and politics – – – this is a very big one (very big question).

Can you point me to where Reich mentions this? I don’t recall him saying anything about monogamy, a trait that is hard to deduce from genetics.

Anthropologically, AFAIK, monogamy seems to have originated in Europe before Christianity, but well after the Neolithic Revolution.

He did not mention monogamy per se (my implication, sorry 🥴),
only surprise as The Law would be expected to be dysgenic.

“Race realist” Jared Taylor keeps peddling disinformation about Jews being smart. They are not.

https://open.substack.com/pub/forbiddentexts/p/the-myth-of-jewish-high-iq

Taylor says Jews, he didn’t say (specifically) Jews in Israel — he’s probably thinking of, or referring to, Ashkenazi Jews, who per most data do have an average IQ higher than Whites (there was some discussion of this in another comment thread).

Generally, all students participate in PISA assessment, this means not just ‘young jews of Israel’ — non-Jews are more than 25% of Israel’s population.

Israel — Student performance (PISA 2022)

Per 2022 data for Israel: math, 458 vs an OECD average of 472 (-3%) — reading, 474 vs 476 (-0.4%) — science, 465 vs 485 (-4%) — while lower, the differences do not seem particularly significant to me — calling the scores in Israel (which includes those of non-Jews) ‘low’ is subjective, but I’m not sure it’s justified.

Average national IQ scores are somewhat controversial, the reliability of the data is often questioned.

National IQs calculated and validated for 108 nations

The above survey by Richard Lynn et al reports an average of 95 for Israel, which is 5% below the normed value of 100 for Whites — I don’t know if there is data for just Jews in Israel.

There’s also the question of the size of the ‘smart fraction’ in Israel — it appears to be at least comparable to the West, as Israel is a first world, technologically advanced society.

Your comment oozes the kind of belligerent stupidity one sees a lot of in comments here.

There existed maybe a “Ewe” from which all mitochondrial DNA have come.

Wow, you betray a definite taste for caprine bestiality. Do you prefer sheep, goats, or one of the more exotic varieties?

I read Mr. Taylor’s article… with near zero interest.

1. American institutions, universities above all, are enemy territory. They’ve all been ‘marched through’ by liars and deceivers and destroyers.

2. David Reich belongs to a group which should be barred from occupying any position of authority whatsoever. Why? Because they are the liars and deceivers and destroyers who ‘marched through’ the institutions.

Those are the two reasons I read this short article with near zero interest.

Also there’s this. ‘Science’ lies.

Scientists lie. I name only one, Ashley Montagu (AKA Israel Ehrenberg) whose epochal (LOL) Man’s Most Dangerous Myth I read when it first appeared.

I’ve had it with ‘Science.’ Engineers and inventors I respect. Scientists, not so much.

As far as I’m concerned, when it comes to race and intelligence ‘Science’ is de trop. I don’t need it. I’ve got my lying eyes, and the lying eyes of my forebears. That’s enough.

Finally there’s this:

…did [Nathan Cofnas] ever see a “gene”? Or see a mitochondria? According to eminent biologist Harold Hillman all we have ever been able to see is clumps of cells…

Wayne Lusvardi, Unz comment, 10/24/24.

Me thinks this Jared Taylor did it on purpose.

I just checked the latest PISA tests results, from 2022.

The Jews of Israel are significantly below the OECD average in Science and in Mathematics (two different tests) and are in the middle (not significantly different from the mean) in Reading. In the latter test, there are 20 countries that have significantly higher scores that the OECD mean and they are all European or Asian. So the minor claim that Jews have higher verbal IQ is also false, Europeans and Asians demonstrate higher verbal capacity in PISA tests.

Taylor says Jews, he didn’t say (specifically) Jews in Israel — he’s probably thinking of, or referring to, Ashkenazi Jews

I was expecting some moron poiting out to ashkenazi jews. That was fast.

This stupid trick is the same as selecting the smartest Guatemalans and when mentioning the poor intellectual performance of the average Guatemalan replying but hey look at these special Guatemalans.

Deal with it, low average IQ of Israeli jews and low performance of young jews of Israel in standardized tests of educational achievement (PISA) mean Jews are dumb on average. Those are facts in hard data.

Per 2022 data for Israel: math, 458 vs an OECD average of 472 (-3%) — reading, 474 vs 476 (-0.4%) — science, 465 vs 485 (-4%) — while lower, the differences do not seem particularly significant to me …

To you because you are ignorant. The PISA 2022 report writes in its tables I.2.1, I.2.2. and I.2.3 that Israel is significantly below the OECD average in two tests, Mathematics and Science.

Now, do you know what “significantly below” means in statistical jargon? Because Israel is right there with all other poor-performers, those significantly below the OECD average.

You’re another of the maliciously dumb people commenting here — you take one phrase (‘genes will show that Jews are smart’), and use it to criticize Taylor for ‘peddling disinformation’, when Taylor has publicly done more to promote white identity and awareness of racial differences than you could do if allowed to live your life many times over.

Attempts to determine and compare the average intelligence of racial and ethnic groups are generally controversial — and there is some controversy about the average intelligence of Jews — most of the data showing Jews have higher average intelligence seems to concentrate on Ashkenazi Jews — whether one believes Jews as a group are on average more intelligent than Whites (no one really cares about other comparisons) appears to be related to confirmation bias more than anything else.

In addition to (somewhat controversial) IQ studies, attainment in science and academia (perhaps more so than in business) seems to provide some evidence that Jews, particularly Ashkenazi Jews, have high intelligence — this alone makes use of the phrase ‘genes will show that Jews are smart’ understandable, meaning it’s not a good reason to accuse Taylor of ‘peddling disinformation.’

David Reich is a Jew. He, therefore, is political before being scientific. End of story on David Reich.

As I pointed out, Israel is more than 25% non-Jewish — is the PISA data regularly broken down between Jews and non-Jews?

Jewish educational attainment

Above (from 2016) it says ‘differences in educational attainment between Jews and Muslims in Israel are substantial’, which is probably still mostly true today — so it’s likely non-Jews pull down overall PISA scores for Israel (it’s similar in the US, where Blacks and mestizos decrease PISA scores).

Is ‘significantly below’ defined? — ultimately, describing the differences as ‘significantly below’ the OECD average is subjective — per the state of Israeli society, i.e. it’s a first world technologically advanced nation, it appears any difference in average intelligence and the size of the ‘smart fraction’ between Israel and other OECD countries has little or no practical significance (it’s the same for Whites and Asians).

The Jews always think several steps ahead and this is why they block any deviant scientist who wants to study race. If the study of race gets any traction, the Jews reason, then people will find out that race really exists; and if people find out race exists, then people will realize the Jews are a race; if people figure out that Jews are a race, then… Hitler. It always boils down to Hitler. Reductio ad Hitlerum. And they may have a point.

Here is what Heidegger wrote in his Black Notebooks:

GA 96: 56-57 (Überlegungen XII, 38) (1939?)
The Jews, with their marked gift for calculation, have already been “living” for the longest time according to the principle of race, which is why they also defend themselves as vigorously as they can against its unrestricted application.

What Heidegger is saying is that Jews are one bunch of conniving scum, the most dangerous peddlers of lies that have ever walked the earth. Well, ok — maybe I’m saying that. But Heidegger did say that the Jews have an incredible talent for strategic thinking (“calculation”) and organization of their tribe: the Jews are deeply aware of their own race and that’s how they have been living since time immemorial, under the “principle of race”. The Jews are, in fact, the first “racists”.

What the Jews most fear is that other races — especially the White race — will catch on to this key understanding, so this is why they will do everything in their power to prevent the White race from becoming racially aware. If Whites start applying the same “principle of race” as the Jews have been applying for millennia, the Jews are fucked. And the Jews know this. So this explains why even Jew scientists like David Reich are prohibited from publicizing their studies on the reality of race.

Spoken like a true hunter-gatherer!

There was a harsh self-selection of Jewish people moving to Israel and this seems to have created a weird population mixture. On average, the smart ones were immigrants from the former USSR and many of them kept moving. The dumb ones are immigrants from everywhere else. I wonder if the Russian-speaking Israeli people are more secular than the others?

You’re another of the maliciously dumb people commenting here — you take one phrase (‘genes will show that Jews are smart’), and use it to criticize Taylor for ‘peddling disinformation’, when Taylor has publicly done more to promote white identity and awareness of racial differences than you could do if allowed to live your life many times over.

This is completely irrelevant. If Taylor started repeatedly talking about how the Earth is flat, he would be peddling disinformation, no matter how you look at it, and no matter how much Taylor has publicly done to promote white identity and awareness of racial differences. The “Jews control everything because they are just that smart” meme is false and is not good for solving the problems White countries face, given that step 1 would be to remove Jews from power.

Attempts to determine and compare the average intelligence of racial and ethnic groups are generally controversial — and there is some controversy about the average intelligence of Jews — most of the data showing Jews have higher average intelligence seems to concentrate on Ashkenazi Jews

Oh, sure. As one person on the Internet commented:

Jews have very IQs. The evidence is clear – studies by Rosenberg, Levinsky, Feingold, Leibovitz, Goldstein, Brodsky & Cohen.

What more do you need, already?

attainment in science and academia

You’re not at all familiar with counter-arguments to that and with alternative hypotheses, are you? Go read up, son.

Much of this website is very much aware and openly talking about how Jews aren’t just genetically “smart”.
That may be true to an extent, but it is very, very far from being the whole story.
All your questions about War and Finance are answered once you understand there are other, less flattering traits that are very much genetic and very peculiar to this singular group — cursed or blessed but for better or worse “chosen” to “dwell alone” and pursue an evolutionary strategy that has painted a trail of blood across the centuries.

That is the bottom line here which Mr. Taylor will not admit. Jews and their hatred of Whites and Christian culture have destroyed academia and other institutions in their pursuit of destroying us. Every narrative is anti-White and anti-Christian. Neo-Marxism is the agenda. Let’s see it for what it is. Satan’s children are behaving just as you would expect Satan’s children to behave.

“David Reich is clearly a smart guy, and from what I can tell, a good scientist.
But what a life he must lead, worrying how to twist his findings in ways that will please people who vote for Kamala Harris.”

Idiotic (or shamelessly dishonest) conclusion that what makes Jew David Reich twist his findings is what his identifying affiliation is: he is a Democrat! Yes, sure it’s that party affiliation that moves him…
Jews like him have to thread a needle whose eye is getting smaller all the time.
On the one hand they will pretend that the whole “there are no races, we are all equal” ideology was not pushed by them to introduce multi-culti, and DEI.
At the same time they will subtly accommodate the view that not only we are not all equally “endowed by the Creator,” but some may indeed be.. superior, and before you know it, Jews can be recognized as superior to all…

Smart people who could plan ahead ended up with more stuff than stupid, shiftless people.

The above could be argued as an advantage up until the modern age.

However, in today’s world which is really the wiser: The schmuck who hustles 24/7 to accumulate unto himself in order to impress himself, his neighbors and friends, who most likely envy and resent his “wealth”, and who then promptly drops dead from a heart attack or stroke and leaves his kin to fight over all the stuff – or – the guy who sits under a tree and is content to be more in harmony with his natural environment?
And of the two, who would be more likely to survive a major disaster.

Our issues today are more related to “behavior” than inherited ” smarts”, we ain’t going to unscramble this egg.

“I have a meme…”

This kind of meme of Hitler’s words keep spreading.
It may sound ‘better in German’ but is more catchy in English.

“Acting like a sewage pump, they were spewing their filth directly in the face of humanity. Is this really what it means to be chosen by God?”

~Austrian Painter@bigmadlad pic.twitter.com/us5wNsFsc6

— Stew Peters (@realstewpeters) October 23, 2024

Thanks for the interesting article Mr. Taylor, but there is no information on what this means for the future. So, kids, lets all face the front and try fit this info into current paradigms in the Zeitgeist.

Gene editing is already, A THING.

https://theweek.com/news/science-health/959606/pros-and-cons-of-gene-editing-babies

40 years ago, when my kids were young, the wife and her three sisters had kids and there were emotional, serious, vitriolic tete-a-tetes re: “My kid is walking (Talking, eating, doing math, driving a car etc. etc. etc.) and your kid is not, my kid is way, way ahead of everyone else’s kid!”

Parents, especially with money, are going to pony up major cash to make sure their kid/embryo is injected with Disney, Einstein, Musk, super cells, no doubt provided by the aforementioned by the estates of same (“Break into the crypt and get some fuck’n bone marrow Margaret, that shit is worth millions!”) and the families of those still living.

Broke nigger athletes, way past their prime and living under bridges will suddenly have goldmines in their nuts, just waiting to be prospected for one more big payday to finance even more crack cocaine binges and “Freak Offs” wid da hoes.

The government, run by Jews will “Affirmative Action” the shit out of the whole thing and there will be “No Justice and No Peace” unless ghetto street niggas can inject millions of “Baby Mommas” with the DNA from John Stuart Mill (Jewish PR Firms will have pictures of Mill, on T-Shirts, bags of Skittles, in Barber Shop movies, rap songs and Charlemagne the God will promote the ice cream on his podcast with Al Sharpton.).

The lion’s share of available retail DNA for muthafikkin “Gene Editing” will go to “The Vulnerable” and “People of Color” while white boys will have access to Congressman Hank Johnson’s (Who thinks Guam will sink if there are too many soldiers on it.) and Leon “Wrong Way” Lett’s leftovers.

Larry Fink will be on film in Jew York City, in St. Patrick’s Cathedral, on live TV, kneeling down and taking his First Communion before the Jews/FDA/CDC/NIH/WHO let a new batch of cream rise to the top in a paroxysm of egalitarian “equality”.

Rich Jews and their white dhimmi status “Allies” will get the first and ONLY shot at IQ enhancement and “The Vulnerable-POCs” will get the watered down second wave version so that white boys are finally and irrevocably sown under the earth with salt at a metaphorical new American Carthage.

The future looks great!

Be sure and vote!

Agree.
Re the Ashkenazi: They are Japhephites, not Semites. The second major group of Jews is Edom/Edomites who are Semites but not Hebrews (Israelites: of the Twelve Tribes); in fact the Jewish Encyclopedia declares Jewry to be Edom; the Twelve Tribes left Palestine when they were removed by the Assyrians and Babylonians. Edom/Esau wasn’t “Chosen” for anything but evenual destruction.
Lame Cherry has a good image showing the original and still maintained Khazarian (Ashkenazi) religion: they worshipped the snake ,i.e, Serpent.
https://lamecherry.blogspot.com/2024/10/an-inside-peak.html

The Snake:
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjTp_F5ryJ6iTysZU2JeJ-qYWvzieCrXt5o9ZTX9Rx3D7ZRVsv3ITIQ4V1jNe1Y4AyxDaElAsQ3eZ79NJ91HllNe3CB6OOcsxY-Tj3gNQSpZSFxwkinIU1OXgJKETGw4_2iifDirHFJObmnBf6O5-WGFD7pq2yPpxX0UuOvkaz-_7ADMWz0G6iujtpxb0U

I understand three of the five terms you used.

Would guess that by ‘Sick’ you mean big ‘health’ and big ‘pharma’. Please inform me if I am wrong in that.

Don’t understand ‘Squelch’ at all, the only meaning I know of that word is a noise-reduction technique for short-wave radio.

JT breaks out into hives every time he attempts to say the J word.

I wonder if the Russian-speaking Israeli people are more secular than the others?

Well the Russian speaking are going to be Ashkenazi and from Eastern Europe. So yes they would be more likely to be secular. The biggest waves of immigrants were from the USSR which means they went to schools where secularism was the norm.

There is a video where some Orthodox are scolding what look like Ashkenazi for working on the Sabbath……as security guards. You can definitely see two sides in conflict.

It’s amazing what a fear of “losing funding” will do to some people.

Saying that people ARE their DNA is analogous to saying people are their cars. Some actually believe it, and spend quite a bit of money on them. Cars, like bodies, do make it easier to get around, pick up the phone, or send an email. But some people make better drivers with Jalopies than others that get drunk and crash their Lamborghinis, or kill kids on the highway.

One things for sure, before we start mass greenlighting a bunch of GMO or cloned humans we better get a better grasp of the relationship between the body, mind and spirit, AND CONSEQUENCES, before we all end up in the junkyard.

Most people are living in the stone ages regarding an understanding of the human mind and don’t even know the difference between the mind and the brain (obviously part of the body), in a large part due to the influence of the failed pseudo-sciences of psychiatry and psychology.

Funny, but unfortunately way too close to the hard nasty truthful reality.

Jared Taylor worships the “higher IQ Jew” and is, therefore, anti-White. Nothing else he says or does is relevant.

The Law would be expected to be dysgenic.

Superficially, it seems monogamy ought to be dysgenic and polygamy ought to be eugenic, but like a lot of things that superficially ought to be eugenic, the data keep coming in the other way.

It might be that the polygamous eugenic advantage of overbreeding elite men is offset by the disadvantage of non-elite men breeding further down the scale.

Or it might be more complex…

https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/the-western-european-marriage-pattern

https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/review-of-j-d-unwins-sex-and-culture

Crypto Joo Jared Taylor’s article here is nothing but a Jooish Supremacist script. “Jews are smart”, ‘they are genetically superior’. This is the new self Chosenite angle they are driving.

As for the conncetion between genes and politics – – – this is a very big one (very big question).

ah yes, the old nature vs. nurture thingy

what is the degree of our behavior that is determined by our DNA?

do blacks tend to be more violently criminal due to something in their DNA, or are their foibles all a result of the persecutions of a racist society?

I just posted a photo of Ukraine’s current Defense Minister on another thread.

If this man moved in next door, and spoke your language perfectly, with all the manners of a dignified country gentleman, would you still hesitate to have him invest your lifesaving’s? Or drop off your kids to his daycare?

As an American, I was raised to believe that any hesitancy to trust and accept a person because of their ethnicity, was the worst offense there is; racism.

But, is there any merit to a certain reluctance to embrace and trust some people, just because of the way some of them look?

If I tell my teenage daughter to avoid men who look like Lemaricus Davidson, am I being the worst kind of person there is.. a racist? And far, far worse, infecting and poisoning my innocent daughter with an evil mindset? Nay, thee most evil mindset of all !

?

This form of ‘science denialism’ is the biggest flaw of the left and should be exploited at every opportunity. Believing that two subspecies of humans can be separated by ~80k years of evolution, with distinct physiological differences, and yet have the *exact same* cognitive profile is balderdash. And these same people mock Christians for believing Moses parted the Red Sea.

Having read Cochran, Plomin et al, I do have a few additional points and nits:

-Important to note that if you apply dna fixation index measurements to humans – using the same standards applied to other animals – you get (IIRC) *at minimum* 5 different human subspecies.

-You need to include Vincent Sarich’s book. It’s a little dated but includes loads of scientific evidence and insights.

-Hunter gatherers eating their native diet are neither fat nor starving. They just didn’t adapt to high glycemic foods. Whites and other Eurasians are only partly adapted. Because refined flower was only recently made widely available – never mind sugary breakfast cereal – even Germans and Chinese can get fat on Western junk food. Also notable that Europeans during the Paleolithic were 5-9 and only shrank when they switched to eating bread (low protein). It was really the advent of cheap meat that finally made us taller again (and disease control). When Europeans first encountered the Plains Indians that were living off buffalo, the Indians were significantly taller than the Whites.

-People all over Eurasia really became lighter when agriculture was introduced. That’s why many Iranians Greeks et al have ‘white’ skin and northern hunter gatherers (see eg Pacific Northwest Indians) have brown skin. Most Europeans outside of Scandinavia had darker skin for tens of thousands of years. Skin color is a combination of both latitude but also experience with agriculture. (Theory is that the poor agricultural diet necessitated getting vitamin D from sun year round when previously it could be obtained in sufficient quantities during the winter from fresh meat).

You can figure out that Jews are smart and East Asians have good impulse control from DNA?

Oh, come now.

https://unherd.com/newsroom/screening-embryos-for-iq-the-latest-frontier-of-baby-engineering/

With all due respect, Mr. Taylor may have shortened that quote. What he meant to write was –

”Genes will show that Jews are smart criminals, liars and cheats. “

You don’t control governments, banking, tech and pharmaceuticals etc. by being deaf, dumb and blind.

You make others deaf, dumb and blind by censoring and brainwashing since before biblical times with useless academic studies and fake media that blind you from reality.

It’s worked for a few thousand years, why fix it?

Darwin is wrong. There exist no transforming of species to other species, no defined direction of “progress”, and no absolute use and meaning of every organ and special function.

Would you like to explain why whales can’t breathe underwater and have finger bones?

Progress is a relative term but there were clearly mammals that not only went back to the ocean but evolved to live there.

Whales are adapted to the ocean and Whites are adapted to colder climates. Both groups transitioned from a different environment. Making this observation offends both Christians and liberals. Everyone wants to believe in a starting point for race. Liberals accept that whales evolved from a land based animal but enforce egalitarian doctrine that states the same rules do not apply to humans. If you ask how that makes any sense then they will accuse you of not following True Science. The Science hath spoken. Race doth not exist.

So there you have it.

Jared is bought by a certain cabal of Js sadly.

He continues: “I am worried that well-meaning people who deny the possibility of substantial biological differences among human populations are digging themselves into an indefensible position, one that will not survive the onslaught of science.”

Well there is no reason to worry.

The establishment knows full well that race exists and will simply ignore anything you say.

Another naive biologist that seems to think he is on the forefront of a great revelation.

GREAT SCOTT I CRUNCHED THE NUMBERS AND IT TURNS OUT THAT RACE EXISTS AFTER ALL

I ONLY HOPE THE ESTABLISHMENT WILL BE ABLE TO ACCEPT THE RESULTS

I SENT THEM MY FINDINGS AND THEY HAVENT RESPONDED. THATS WEIRD.

that’s werner herzog btw.

jared is like 73 years old and he has the mind of a child. there’s so much gayness in this article it would take a way too long time to straighten out.

sad.

always remember. others may hate you. but those who hate you don’t win unless you hate them. and then you become jared.

i remember the hmong cop saying: this is what happens when you do drugs.

i remember myself saying: jared is what happens when jews give you money. sad.

No idea? I have an idea. You have an idea. Genes will show that Jews are smart, East Asians have good impulse control, Amerindians get diabetes, and Africans – well, they behave like Africans.

Jews aren’t smart — they are what classical composer genius, Richard Wagner , called them : plastic demons of decay. The average ashkenazi Jew has an IQ of 112 or 115 abouts. This profile is not equally distributable between verbal IQ and visual-spatial (mathematical IQ); rather, it is highly loaded on the verbal IQ axis and lackluster on the mathematical IQ axis :

Afraid of your own data…?

How about this data:

“Provision of the requested assistance may include the use of force likely to result in lethal consequences, including death or serious bodily injury. It also includes all support to civilian law enforcement officers in situations where confrontation between law enforcement officers and civilians or groups may reasonably be expected.” – Pentagon Directive №5240.01.

or ‘When the gubberment really <3 you!'

I once brought this same exact point up to Jared before and he responded with the non-sequitur (paraphrase) : “then why have so many scientists been Jewish or why are there so mant Jewish scientists?”. Meanwhile, mathematical p-hacking and data-dredging makes most scientific studies’ results false :

Video Link

I wonder if intelligence directly correlates with predilection towards psychopathy?

As for the guy in the image … if we would put down that pen and rub those hands together, he would be the meme.

But the fittest survive. The best soldiers, the ones who know how to hide, how to kill, how to avoid bullets and how to have a little luck, survive. What is bravery? Running into a hail of bullets? Not so smart, not a good, long-term way to soldier. Being too naive? Believing too much in the cause? Maybe that’s not a good thing for a combat soldier? Part of being the best soldier is coming home when the war is over.

Lynne guessed 108* because the only Jews he ever met were doctors, dentists and professors. Had he come to Queens, NY or Brooklyn, he’d have met Jewish cops, garbagemen, subway cleaners, hs dropouts drug dealers and users. There is no definitive, repeatable test showing Ashkenazi IQ. That test doesn’t exist because IQ results aren’t separated by religion, only race.

*Read Lynne’s study where he admits “108” is an estimate based on his experiences with Jews. Because there is no verifiable, repeatable test.

Their celebrated Jews of history are all Ashkenazi. Which means part Slavic.

A sort of middle class group of Slav hybrids.

Fox/Brietbart/Dopey Con Inc websites celebrate Jewish achievements as due to their religion and hard work. But that doesn’t explain how their scientists are practically all Ashkenazi. In fact the famous of Jews of influence (Marx, Rand, Friedman, etc) are mostly secular and Ashkenazi. Dutifully religious Sephardic don’t seem as interested in creating television shows or bullshit ideologies like libertarianism. This divergence warrants a discussion.

There was also very little from Israel in terms of scientific and technological production until the Ashkenazi moved there after WW2.

I wouldn’t put too much emphasis on tests of any group. You could play a similar game if you only tested Nordics of Minnesota and compared them to the American average. They would of course be higher than average but they aren’t considered a separate group.

The discussion should focus on undermining liberal fiction and not obsessing over outcomes compared to Jews.

Your post reminded me about a study that came out a while back. Amusingly the shitlibs are starting to apply their ideology to the animal kingdom, there was a research paper, I think last year, that was moaning about so called systemic privilege in the world of insects.

It showed that successful bees or yellow jackets, can’t remember which, gave their offspring more resources & thus perpetuated inequality.

I’m counting down the days till they start arguing that we should do a marxist revolution in the animal kingdom to artificially induce equity.

I tried looking this study up & I see now that’s not the only one, there’s apparently several of them. The WEF of all things has an article about it, though I really don’t understand what they were going for by mentioning animal inequality. Regardless its a bit ironic for them to be wringing their hands about inequality given they’re quite open about the fact they want the whole world to be reduced to bug eating serfs living in pods ruled by a tiny minority. Then again pretty much everything about modernity is ironic when examined with a critical eye so its thematically fitting at least.

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/01/inequality-animals/

It’s probably all determined by genetics, and modified by nature.

It’s called “white people”

Soviet institutions would have departments to study “bourgeois economics” whose experts, on examining the evidence, would of course discover facts crushing Communist ideology. Their papers would often lay out convincing, even devastating cases for free-market economics, preceded with a fig leaf such as “The following is the propaganda put out by the capitalist class funded economists” and followed by “The preceding of course is mere plutocrat propaganda meant to justify oppressing the workers, and has long ago been refuted by socialist science.” Such is how the facts got out there

They’re already doing this by hysterically denying that pit bulls are more dangerous than other dog breeds. If you cite statistics showing the drastically disproportionate share of maulings, deaths, etc caused by pit bulls vs other breeds, they’ll respond with anecdotes about good pit bulls and bad dogs from other breeds, and even with accusations of bigotry.

Still repeating the “jews are intelligent” hoax, huh? Guess there’s genuinely no hope for you.

I think of all the shit/lie books about race that gained popularity over the last 30 years or so, and, no surprise, the “racial egalitarian” crap nonsense was almost all written by jews.

For example, the jew jared diamond’s book “guns, germs, and steel” is poppycock, unprovable nonsense. It likely only gained popularity because of the jewish nytimes book reviews, etc, where hypocritical jewish racial “egalitarians” (not truly egalitarian, the jews think Whites are biologically geared to be evil, and Palestinians are biologically mandated to be terrorists you know) promoted the jew diamond and his unsupportable theorizing about race and geography. More jewish ethnic nepotism.

Similarly, when Harvard scientist EO Wilson wrote “Sociobiology” explaining that all animals, including humans, tend to look after their own genetic interests, the jews gould and lewontin lost their minds and consistently vilified and slandered Wilson and other Sociobiologists.

Great book: https://a.co/d/irrQ9We

If you want to read what hucksters, liars, and frauds the jews gould and lewontin were regarding Sociobiology, and their relentless attacks against the true scientist EO Wilson, read “Defenders of the Truth” by Segerstrale.

Another great book comparing legitimate gentile scientists, vs jewish lying hucksters posing as impartial reporters:
https://a.co/d/3vKCCQr

jews just constantly promote lies….whatever lies they think are “good for the jews” are what they push. They are a people without integrity, without honesty, and without truth. They are anti truth, and any gentile that follows their lead (ie, western lefttards) will thus be anti truth as well. Clearly “david reich” is either a tribe member, or a gentile duped by the tribe.

That jared taylor can have any respect for this group is unbelievable.

Iranian Greeks? When did the Scandinavians move to Scandinavia and from where?When did the (future) Greeks come to Europe and from where?

You’re right, they even have organizations dedicated to running PR campaigns to shill for pit bulls. I kind of have wildlife mentally separated from “domestic” pets (even though that particular breed is anything but domesticated) why I didn’t even think about that, but its definitely within that same ideological wheelhouse.

You seem to have gotten everything mixed up and confused. Are Ashkenazis – Khazars? Whose language is Yiddish? Why are the ‘Khazars’ in the picture wearing Serbian Phrygian caps like the Dacians (Goths) also wore?

Furthermore, David Reich has never mentioned (that I can find) that Ashkenazi Jews are almost all converts of the 8th and 9th century and have little credibility in pontificating that they are related to the Hebrews of the bible.

I read Who We Are and How We Got Here when it was published and if I remember correctly, Mr. Reich went out of his way to say that Ashkenazi Jews like him and his ancestors should be exempt from ancient DNA research because “they have already been studied enough.” This seems like an odd position for a scientist, but perhaps he is afraid of spotlighting the sort of issue you bring up.

The biggest waves of immigrants were from the USSR which means they went to schools where secularism was the norm.

So, you will certainly agree with me that the definition of derogatory kike on the AJC website (which supposedly comes from kikel=circle, in Yiddish, since allegedly illiterate Jews from the USSR did not want to sign with a X, because it resembled a cross, but a circle) is not only wrong but also ridiculous.

Maybe you happen to know (fingers crossed) the real meaning while almost 8000 of us are waiting to find out:

https://www.unz.com/article/israels-ideology-of-genocide-must-be-confronted-and-stopped/#comment-6792389

Regardless its a bit ironic for them to be wringing their hands about inequality given they’re quite open about the fact they want the whole world to be reduced to bug eating serfs living in pods ruled by a tiny minority.

They are perfectly fine with Whites and especially White men being on the unequal side of anything.

I’ve pointed out to liberals that an equalized third world America would lead to the global dominance of China.

They all said that would be fine. Not a single one took issue with that possible outcome.

It’s amusing as to how quickly they will forget their own beliefs. If race doesn’t exist then global equality should be achievable. Why would you be fine with Asians dominating the global? Answer: They are really just anti-White and don’t actually believe what they preach. They would happily take Brazil the continent with Asians in charge. I’ve even had liberals admit that there would be less technological progression. Again they were fine with that and forgot to take objection. If race doesn’t exist then according to liberal theory there should actually be more technological progression once White barriers are removed. There are actually very few liberals that can remember all their beliefs and apply them consistently. They too easily forget that they are supposed to believe in equality for all areas.

I agree, obsessing over test outcomes is wrong. But facts is facts and there are zero verifiable, repeatable tests that show high Ashkenazi IQ scores. Simply correcting a fable isn’t obsessive. I also agree that undermining the liberal fiction is a good thing.

“Smart”
Oh please, give me a break. This is the most weaseliest word in the English language.

They are really just anti-White

For the elites this is true but for a certain segment of the more batshit crazy leftists I think they’re just hostile to anything & anyone successful & adaptive. When it comes to humans that naturally means they hate White people & men in particular. But its also why there’s idiot out there wringing their hands about insect inequality of all things.

Obviously this is a mostly pointless distinction for our purposes & there’s plenty more sub varieties of this sort but ultimately in the end they’re all united in hostility towards White interests as you point out.

Those leftists you described are the most interesting to me. It’s very rare but I’ve encountered extremely anti White liberals who are like that who suddenly had their bubbles popped when I casually pointed out that, at rate things are going, White people won’t exist in a century. For some of these people they’re just parroting the moral dogma that’s been fed to them without thinking about the actual long term consequences.

Thats the minority though, the most common ones, like what you described, are so comically evil its mind boggling to me. Every single virtuous talking point is not only a lie but happily sacrificed at the altar of ethnically cleansing Whites.

On a side note that’s why I cannot view people of European descent who are like that as the same race as the rest. Race & ethnicity is really just a collection of genetics & those people are so fundamentally alien that if they were brown or jewish no one would argue they were simply brainwashed. Its like an anti social archetype whose personality traits are all anti natural, even bantu when viewed in the environmental context which they evolved make sense but these people do not.

Its like they’re jews without the ethnocentrism, at least with the jews I can understand their relentless pursuit of wealth at the cost of everything & why they’re so destructive. Glorifying ugliness & degenerating society has a purpose for them, they’ll leave when the destruction is complete but not these people. They want to see the world burn even when it means they themselves will perish for no practical reason, in fact they seem to enjoy getting toll collected by savages, its like they view themselves as martyrs for the cause of destruction & nothing else.

Źzzźzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz…

No one cares about your stupid f@@#ing science you goddamn dolt.

At all.

AT ALL.

What matters – 50 million blacks and growing.

canada 2 million and growing

UK 1 million growing

France 2 million and growing

Germany 1 million growing

Belgium same

Netherlands same

Etc.

Genes will show that Jews are smart….

And mentally ill: psychopathic, pathological liars…

Jews taken the Western world just to destroy it/their own nest… It’s not smart, it’s insane at the highest levels…

TLDR: the genes for lighter skin spread relatively recently, and coinciding with agriculture. In addition, those genes never spread in hunter gatherers outside of extreme northern latitudes. Does that make sense? There were several genetic populations that mixed to create modern Europeans, but universal light skin came much later. The trigger for light skin across Eurasia was agriculture.

That’s why a German person can get sunburned relatively easily in their native Munich during the summer solstice, which doesn’t make much sense from an evolutionary perspective until you understand the effect of agriculture.

I know the idea broadly have “good impulse control” is horseshit based on the existence of Liveleak with China alone. It’s good to see Taylor and others are still stuck on the “oriental superman” shtick pioneered by autistic charlatans like Rushton and Lynn as a way to deflect white supremacist accusations while sanitizing one of the most corrupt and soulless countries on the planet.

You didn’t answer my questions.
Other –

the genes for lighter skin spread relatively recently, and coinciding with agriculture.

I don’t deny that. What does that mean? It is in accordance with what science says – the white race was created in the collision of primitive nomads (so-called ‘Indo-Europeans’) who came from the Russian steppes in 2800BC and the natives of Europe.

The natives knew about agriculture thousands of years before the arrival of the nomads (also metal smelting, gold processing, house building, astronomy, calendar, mathematics, script, etc.). Only those who knew about agriculture had a calendar.

The nomads did not know any of the above and they did not know about agriculture either. So the conclusion is – the white race arose in Europe from the natives. The Scandinavians were the natives of Europe, but the Germans were not. They came from Asia and there is no ‘native Munich’. The Germans entered today’s Germany only after Charlemagne and took the land from the natives. Perhaps you happen to know the meaning of the name German, which did not exist before coming to Europe, just as the name ‘Greeks‘ did not.

I’m not convinced about evolution at all. To me that takes more “faith” than believing in a creator. I’m agnostic on this point.

liberals

Are you referring to socialists, as in socialism and egalitarian doctrine?

Is ‘significantly below’ defined? — ultimately, describing the differences as ‘significantly below’ the OECD average is subjective —

YES, ‘significantly below’ is well defined mathematically and there is nothing subjective about it. Do a search for “statistically significant”.

Even after discounting the non-Jewish population of Israel, the avereage IQ is well below 100 (93-95) and Israel still is significantly below the OECD mean in Maths and Science and in the middle in Reading. Nothing changes.

Accept reality as shown to you by numbers and standardized tests: Jews are dumb on average, nothing special about them in the department of intellectual endowment, they are mediocre to laggards on average. THOSE ARE FACTS, easily confirmed by doing some little research about their own nation.

… Or it might be that the instantiations of polygamy are overbreeding the wrong ‘elites’.

You get more of what you breed for!

Do we want wolves and gibbons or hyenas and bonobos?

Or maybe we don’t really get a choice: it is bio-determined for us?

https://www.nature.com/articles/nn.3420

Or maybe it’s in that weird in-between “epigenetic” space?

So define it for me, mathematically.

Contrary to what you seem to believe, I don’t think there’s a fixed ‘mathematical’ definition of ‘statistically significant’ — and changing terms is a sign you’re dealing with a dishonest person who’s trying to salvage an argument — originally you did not say ‘statistically significant’, you said ‘significantly below.’

And show me the evidence for the claim that ‘after discounting the non-Jewish population of Israel, the average IQ is well below 100 (93-95)’ — otherwise I’ll have to conclude it’s what you believe due to your confirmation bias.

Then answer the question about whether PISA scores for Israel are available separately for Jews and non-Jews (I don’t know, maybe they are) — to compare them in order to get an idea of how they affect the scores of students in Israel generally.

>That test doesn’t exist because IQ results aren’t separated by religion, only race.

The situation is definitely a little complicated, but in general it does not seem unfair to say that Jews are an ethnic group, or a collection of closely related ethnic groups, and Judaism is a religion — and national IQ data seems to effectively separate Whites by ethnicity (national origin) — so since Ashkenazi Jews appear to form an identifiable genetic cluster, in principal IQ tests for them would be just as valid (‘repeatable’) as for other racial and ethnic groups.

I’m not aware of any study, estimate, or comments by Lynn specifically about Ashkenazi Jews.

racism? Imagine a world with only one language among the species and its Hebrew?

You people need to make up your minds: either Taylor ‘worships’ Jews, or he ignores them — which is it?

The usual complaint is that Taylor ignores Jews, meaning he doesn’t talk about the role of Jews in undermining white society — in fact it goes further: if you mention Jews in a comment on AmRen, even in a circumspect way, it will be deleted — that did annoy me when it happened.

But now I accept that for whatever reason, Taylor does not feel comfortable talking about Jews — as I suggested before, maybe it was a strategic decision — in any case, there are many others who talk about Jews in a more than adequate way.

Most important is that Taylor is pro-white (it’s absurd to suggest otherwise) — in addition to spreading awareness of the reality of irremediable biological racial differences and their consequences, he has spent decades promoting white identity and the interests of white people — his book Paved With Good Intentions is still one of the best of its kind — I don’t feel the need to impose a kind of infantile ideological purity test on him.

You cite Lynn as a source proving high Ashkenazi IQ, yet you’re unfamiliar with his work? Interesting. You actually quoted his number of 108 for Jews, but haven’t read how he got the number? Incredible. And, yes, it would be possible to separate Ashkenazi and give tests to different groups of them over several years and in different parts of the country to come up with a reasonable number, but it’s never been done. It may be true that Ashkenazi have high IQs, or it may be false. We don’t have any actual proof and the fact that we don’t, probably indicates it’s false.

Contrary to what you seem to believe, I don’t think there’s a fixed ‘mathematical’ definition of ‘statistically significant’ […] originally you did not say ‘statistically significant’, you said ‘significantly below.’

Lol, I’m talking to a completely illiterate (perhaps it should be innumerate, as in lacking numeracy) jew here. You’re a good example of the run-of-the-mill dumb jew that comprises the vast majority of jewry, having an average IQ of 92 and low scores in PISA tests.

Far greater is the possibility that Jew David Reich will stay true to form as a lying Jew, much like his lying ANTHROPOLOGY JEW relatives such as Jay Gould who bullshit book was MANDATORY reading. “Evolutionary biology” sounds like a Jew rebranding of “Physical Anthropology” before lying Jew Boas and his tribe took it over and LIED about everything INVENTING whole cloth the bull shit notion that EVERYTHING was cultural and thus SUBJECTIVE with the specific intent of undermining whites and paving the way for cultural pluralism (read: divide and conquer using mass immigration.) using this PSEUDOSCIENCE in our universities to brainwash Americans over 100 years ago just as the Protocols of Zion said they would.


Video Link
This Jew gives himself away if you look carefully claiming:

“to a claim with no scientific evidence*S that they know what those differences are and also that the differences correspond to long-standing popular stereotypes a
conviction that is essentially guaranteed to be wrong.”

Then claims in the very next sentence:
“We truly have no idea right now what the nature or direction of genetically encoded differences among populations will be.”

So this slithering Jew is “essentially guaranteeing” that stereotypes are not true, then admits/claims they have “no idea” what the differences will be?
All we need him to say now is that he is CERTAIN ALL Palestinians are terrorists! LMFAO!

And if those stereotypes that he is certain are wrong turn out to be true? It will be “Goyim I….I made a MISTAKE!”

Just answer my questions:

Define ‘significantly below’ mathematically — you said it was ‘well defined mathematically’, so what exactly is the mathematical definition?

(As an aside, also give me a fixed, generally agreed mathematical definition of ‘statistically significant’, since you also used that term.)

And answer my question about whether PISA results for Jews and non-Jews in Israel are available.

Once you’ve got a hard mathematical definition of ‘significantly below’, and the PISA scores for Jews in Israel, you can check to see if the PISA results for Jews in Israel meet the mathematical criterion for being ‘significantly below’ the OECD average.

See how simple that is?

>attainment in science and academia

In another comment elsewhere I mention a paper by Lynn et al about Jews in the UK:

On the high intelligence and cognitive achievements of Jews in Britain

This passage from the abstract is why I mention attainment:

Data are presented for the numbers of Jewish Fellows of the Royal Society in relation to their proportion in the population. It is found that Jews were over-represented by a factor of 3.7 in the years 1901 through 1940 and by a factor of 7.6 in the years 1950 through 2003. Data are also presented for the numbers of Jewish Nobel prize-winners in Britain and the United States for 1901 through 2003. It is shown that Jews are over-represented among Nobel prize-winners by a factor of 8.0 in Britain and 12.3 in the United States.

While data for average Jewish IQ (in Israel and generally) might be controversial, this data on Jewish achievement seems fairly uncontroversial, and it is not unreasonable to say it suggests higher intelligence among Jews (at least in the Jewish ‘smart fraction’).

it suggests higher intelligence among Jews [Guatemalans] (at least in the Jewish [Guatemalan] ‘smart fraction’).

Lol, look up tautology, it’s the silly fallacy a dumb jew would fall for while trying to appear ‘smart’ and failing. I left some crumbs as in-quotes above to help you undestand.

Yes, they have chosen their survival strategy.

Just like the chameleons.

Those who don’t go along with the chosen strategy try to get out, exercising free will.

To get off the evolutionary track they were born into.

This can be challenging.

“cultivating my own kefir” – Aiiee! (makes sign of the cross)

“air-frying delicious seafood” – it must be said that the air fryer is a boon and a blessing to men – we only use the oven now if cooking for half a dozen.

I am seeing some comments about this so here goes:
Regarding the origins of Europeans.
This is a summary of a lecture by Johannes Krause a scientist at the prestigious Max Planck institute in Germany, explaining the broad results of impressive genetic studies and findings in few recent years. I find his presentation both impressive and credible, watch the video below the ‘MORE’ tag and judge for your self. The ‘beef’ starts about 40 minutes into the video.

15.000 years ago we have dark skinned hunter gatherers in Europe, their skin color genetically indistinguishable from sub Saharan Africans. Blue eyes start emerging and spread relatively fast. Several thousands years later they ALL had (light colored) blue eyes, about 8-10.000 years ago, but still had dark skin and were still hunter gatherers.

Around this time (8,000 years ago) a major migration event happened, early farmers dispersed from Anatolia (the Levant) and brought agriculture and domestic animals to Europe. They were quite successful to say the least so about 7500 years ago ‘Europeans’ looked just like Anatolian’s with 99% of the genetic makeup coming from there. However the existing hunter gatherers were still present (likely in the north) and in the following millennia these groups mixed, increasing H.G. genes in heartland Europe. (possible the attraction of blue eyes?). The infamous ‘Iceman’ Ötzi is from this genepool, and the closest current group are the Sardinians.

Second major migration event happened around 5000 years ago when groups from the Eastern European pontic steppe, north of the black sea, entered the heartland of Europe. This group had very different genetic makeup from the then existing Europeans. (Think Europe vs East Asians today) The newcomers were herders, practiced pastoralism and were highly mobile. Besides introducing new cultural practices, they brought Indo-European languages. Substantial part of their genome is from Iran and from there comes the language and their agricultural practices. This group had the wheel and wagons, cows and sheep.

Oddly this was mainly male migration and the newcomers were incredibly successful in spreading their genes extremely fast. They almost totally replaced the existing male gene-pool in central Europe in just 200 years or so. So about 4800 years ago the major components of the current European genetic makeup are already there – consisting of these three groups. Northern Hunter gatherers, farmers from Anatolia and farmers from the ‘east’.

Let’s see what the data says in additional context and then theorize what the explanation might be.

Data are presented for the numbers of Jewish Fellows of the Royal Society in relation to their proportion in the population. It is found that Jews were over-represented. Data are also presented for the numbers of Jewish Nobel prize-winners in Britain and the United States for 1901 through 2003. It is shown that Jews are over-represented among Nobel prize-winners in Britain and 12.3 in the United States.

It is also shown that Jews are over-represented among those who control finance, academia, the media, Hollywood and the music industry. It is also shown that Jews are over-represented among Biden’s presidential administration. It is also shown that Jews are over-represented among spouses of children of American presidents. It is also shown that Jews are over-represented among LGBTQ+ and mass immigration advocacy groups. It is also shown that Jews are over-represented among other influential institutions and positions of power.

In this context, are the Jews over-represented among Nobel prize-winners and Fellows of the Royal Society because they are that smart, or is it because they are tribalistic and nepotistic and they happen to control most of Western institutions, including those that decide who will be Nobel prize-winners and Fellows of the Royal Society?

Why not test these two hypotheses by looking at countries that have Jewish diaspora but that are not ZOG-ruled countries where Jews control everything?

The comment confirms my observation that Europeans often do not know the origins of their civilization. The reader has clearly made a commendable effort to search for available information and has found a source that seems credible. If I have the opportunity, I will review it in detail and share my perspective. For now, I will rely only on the quoted sections. While there are some correct points, there are also many inaccuracies—making a half-truth far from the truth. A single logical error is enough to dismantle this confused theory.

Previously, there were two main theories about the origin of the so-called ‘Indo-European’ (a term I consider meaningless) language: the Anatolian theory, which claimed that both the IE language and agriculture originated in Anatolia, and the Kurgan theory, which suggested that the IE language was brought by primitive nomads from the Russian steppes. In the meantime, the author of the Anatolian theory has abandoned his claim because it was untenable. Now, it seems they are attempting to merge the remnants of these two discredited theories into a confusing new narrative.

Curiously, references to the oldest European civilization, culture, mythology, and its creators are deliberately omitted. It’s no wonder that many Europeans know so little about their own civilization, culture, or language. The claim that newcomers from Anatolia made up 99% of the population before the arrival of primitive nomads from the Russian steppes is a glaring falsehood that easily discredits this ‘theory.’ If this were true, why does this population no longer exist? The indigenous people of Europe—against whom these nomads committed genocide—are now referred to as ‘hunter gatherers.’

Even the so-called primitive nomads are inaccurately referred to as farmers, despite the fact that they were unfamiliar with agriculture until they arrived in Europe around 4800 BC. It’s conveniently ignored that the indigenous population knew about agriculture, metallurgy, goldsmithing, house building, mathematics, calendars, astronomy, and literacy thousands of years before the arrival of these Stone Age nomads, who certainly were not farmers.

The theory of the so-called Indo-European language is not only flawed and illogical, but also absurd, and it is easy to prove this. Clearly, these nomads were not Aryans, yet Sanskrit is considered an ‘Indo-European’ language. So who brought that language to Asia, and how could it have developed from a proto-language in a process that would have taken at least 4,000 years of prior history? Even mainstream scholars, such as Anthony, admit that nothing is known about these nomads before 3100 BC, leaving the mystery of where they were and how they developed this ‘Indo-European’ language, which they supposedly imposed on a civilization several thousand years older.

Further confusion surrounds the origin of the so-called white race, as no clear explanation is given of where and how it originated. Were the primitive nomads white? Even mainstream scholars suggest that the white race emerged from a mix between the native Europeans and nomads from the Russian steppes, leaving the question: who passed the ‘whiteness’ to whom?

A few days ago, another text appeared that confirms my views and denies the theories about the arrival of agriculture from Anatolia.

https://www.labrujulaverde.com/en/2024/10/a-house-from-8000-years-ago-found-in-serbia-belonged-to-the-first-sedentary-farmers-of-europe/

Thus, my assertion remains valid—Europeans do not truly understand their origins and may well disappear before they uncover the truth.

What a surprise, you want to quibble with the over-representation of Jews among the most distinguished academics, scientists, etc.

Why not? — for one, because I’m not that interested in the question, I have no need (as you apparently do) to believe or to show that Jews just aren’t that smart — also, I’m familiar with the development of atomic and quantum physics in the early 20th century, and Jews are well represented there too — so this data didn’t really surprise me.

Lastly, I don’t see it as particularly significant — as I said before, while most data indicates some Asian ethnic groups have a higher average IQ than Whites, it is of no practical importance, e.g. in the technical quality of civilizations they create (migrant flows indicate many Asians prefer white civilization) — it’s the same for Whites and Jews: any difference, if it exists and whatever its magnitude, is not significant — other issues with Jews (finance, societal influence, e.g. the media, political activism, etc) are much more important.

Idiot.

Lies, damned lies and statistics. The Jews of Israel are two different peoples. European Jews and Non-European Jews. The former make Israel into a significant scientific and technical nation. The latter, mostly of MENA (Middle Eastern and North African) origin resemble the population they came from.

Long ago, I heard about Israeli efforts to have social workers teach non-European Jewish immigrants Western child-rearing practices. I know little about this but I am sure the results have been studied.

By the way, the demographic future of Israel is that it is going to become a nation of Jews of non-European descent within several more generations. Exactly how the Muslim Arabs are going to respond then is a good question. They can’t tell the people to go back to Europe, because they aren’t European.

I suspect the efforts in Israel to get the non-European Jews to achieve up to Western standards in education have yielded the same results as similar efforts with different non-European peoples in the West. Some success stories and a lot of people who stay as always have been.

Saying that people ARE their DNA is analogous to saying people are their cars.

Gearheads know, cars are their DNA. There is a reason why, in the bad old days, GM made the worst new cars and the best used cars. It was in GM’s corporate and engineering DNA. Okay, DNA is a metapjhor in this case, but every institution has its DNA.

Hi Any Mike, I think yoi’re kinda getting my point. People are individuals and they like what they like and do whay they do. But if someone murders someone they can’t go up to the Judge and say “Your Honor, my DNA made me do it”. Not any more than they could say: “the devil made me do it”. Although it is true that murderers and their sponsors WILL try to get away with ANYTHING, AND get peoples agreement to help them do just that.

We are SO MUCH MORE thsn our bodies, or our DNA or our cars, gearheads or not.

I thought I was saying, cars are like people.

Well…..some bodies are prettier than others. But sometimes the prettiest or nicest looking are the ugliest inside. So…ok. some people just want to stay in their car all day. Some people recognize it’s main feature is to help get them from point A to point B.

You’re correct about Big Sick.

Big Squelch is shorthand for the ongoing curtailment of dissident speech:

• legislation like the Antisemitism Awareness Act and anti-BDS conditions in government contracts

• website and social media comment moderation or outright elimination

• erosion of tenure protections in academia

• corporate employment policies

• etc

• the criminal lawfare waged under auspices of the Foreign Agents Registration Act against people who can be connected, however tenuously, to non-domestic sources of income or even sources of information

This last example is relatively recent, but has really taken off in the past few years. The Establishment is increasingly reliant on cultivating foreign enemies not only to sustain Big War, but blame others for its failures of the American people.

The Diffident Right has had practically nothing to say about it, either.

. But if someone murders someone they can’t go up to the Judge and say “Your Honor, my DNA made me do it”. Not any more than they could say: “the devil made me do it”.

Sure but we aren’t far from liberals using that as an excuse. They already use the “developing brain” excuse for 18-24 year olds.

When criminality is eventually linked to DNA we will see liberals change tactics and use it as an excuse for crime tolerance…..well for certain criminals anyways. It will be “the science” that requires them to give early parole to anyone with the vulnerability. The science compels you!

Right! It’s already happening in this upside down, backwards world, where war equals peace, and liberal equals restrictive, and justice equals injustice, and freedom of speech equals “shut up or go to prison, or worse- your grave”. A lot of it starts with the thievery of words by criminals who are not opposed to stealing ANYTHING. They sow chaos and confusion.

Ah, david the 3rd Reich. What a pathetic jew to steal the name of the Germans empires. The 1st Reich, the 2nd Reich, the 3rd Reich. Jews and parasite nigs are truly shit…

It’s also a surname
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reich_(surname)

Kefir is kind of an embarrassment, I agree. But those gut bacteria are nice guys to have on your side.