[go: up one dir, main page]

The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersiSteve Blog
Hold the Presses!

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

 
Hide 360 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. I wonder if his mom ever thought, before leaving Chicago, if I just take this pain in the ass kid to Mississippi maybe the locals will take care of him.

    Or maybe not, but it seems like she knew taking him down there was a bad idea and she did it anyway.

    • Replies: @Anon
    @Che Blutarsky

    I’d imagine that she knew the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree, what with his father being a rapist murderer and all.

    , @Ebony Obelisk
    @Che Blutarsky

    You are an awful human being

    You should be ashamed if yourself

    People like you are why we cannot have nice things

    One good thing is that demogdarogx Cheney is hapienyhand wgiyres will soon be a minutely

    Replies: @fredyetagain aka superhonky

    , @Alden
    @Che Blutarsky

    Reasons why she sent Emmett to Mississippi for the summer.

    1 It was the custom for blacks. Keep the thugs out of trouble and help on the southern farms. White parents sent kids to summer camp. Most families visit out of town relatives in summer.

    2 Historically, blacks dump their kids on others.

    2 Emmett was hard to handle get rid of him in summer when he wasn’t in school.

  2. Protect them from what? NYT tourists?

  3. Anonymous[377] • Disclaimer says:

    Black people are toxic. If not your black friend, then most certainly many of his/her friends and relatives.

    Overall, they’re just too much trouble. They turn cities into wastelands. They have no leadership, and never will, because even the few who are able to conform to western civilization want nothing to do with their own morass once they can get away from them.

    Take a lesson from well-to-do blacks: Just stay the fuck away from them.

    https://nypost.com/2023/07/22/lowes-worker-gets-black-eye-loses-job-trying-to-stop-thieves/

  4. @Che Blutarsky
    I wonder if his mom ever thought, before leaving Chicago, if I just take this pain in the ass kid to Mississippi maybe the locals will take care of him.

    Or maybe not, but it seems like she knew taking him down there was a bad idea and she did it anyway.

    Replies: @Anon, @Ebony Obelisk, @Alden

    I’d imagine that she knew the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree, what with his father being a rapist murderer and all.

  5. Cue the Vogues!

    Till the moon deserts the sky…
    Till all the seas run dry…
    Till then I’ll worship you…
    Till the tropic sun grows cold…
    Till this young world grows old…

    You are my reason to live…

    Till, the rivers flow upstream…
    Till lovers cease to dream…
    Till then I’m yours…

    Their other big hit was “Turn Around, Look at Me”, a most fitting title for every “fringe” of the coalition.

    • Replies: @Ganderson
    @Reg Cæsar

    I was always partial to “5 o’clock World”- I reminds me of me as a kid riding my bike from St.Paul over to Lake Nokomis on a hot summer day…

  6. Anon[200] • Disclaimer says:

    American and British normies like to talk about conservatives and people living in places like China and Russia being brainwashed, but the fact that unusual white-on-black murders such as those of Emmett Till and Stephen Lawrence play such an outsized role in racial discourse in both countries is truly flabbergasting.

    I suspect more whites are murdered by blacks every year in both countries than blacks who have ever been murdered by whites. Till and Lawrence are the ultimate “man bites dog” news stories.

    • Replies: @Hypnotoad666
    @Anon


    I suspect more whites are murdered by blacks every year in both countries than blacks who have ever been murdered by whites. Till and Lawrence are the ultimate “man bites dog” news stories.
     
    Members of the Till family murdered two white women (that we know of), and two of its members were killed by whites (one judicial, one extra-judicial). So even looking at just the Till family, it's a 2-2, tie.
  7. Beyonce is playing Soldier Field tonight. Its raining. Racism!😣

    • LOL: Kylie
  8. • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
    @Ralph L

    It's pretty bizarre that wild animals are culled more ruthlessly for antagonism with humans than Canis lupus familiaris.

    Replies: @Sollipsist, @Jack D

  9. Louis Till could not be reached for comment….

    • LOL: Nicholas Stix
  10. Anonymous[139] • Disclaimer says:

    The Biden administration is on Till’t.

  11. A young Latino woman that was 21 years old was shot recently by a 15 year old black kid while sitting in the passenger seat of her car in a Nashville Apartment complex. It was an attempted carjacking. Her name was Genesis Garcia. She wanted to be a pharmacist.

    Are there going to be any statues built for Genesis Garcia?

    Jesus pointed out to the Pharisees how they’d pick a gnat out of their brother’s eye and ignore a camel in their own eye. The Biggest Lies I’ve ever seen in my life over the years are actually truths, but they are over emphasized out of all reasonable proportion. A molehill literally made out to be a mountain.

    Joe Biden is damaging the Biden family name to the point that their descendants are going to be ashamed of it. John Allen Muhammad and Boyd Lee Malvo killed 10 innocent people as “The Beltway Snipers”, but white people wisely do not want to build statues of the 10 victims to stir up racial resentment against black folks, but see that justice was done and move on together. I think most blacks probably don’t think this monument is a good idea. The powers-that-be want that psyop narrative badly don’t they? Tell me how that military recruiting is going again?

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    @Robertson


    '...I think most blacks probably don’t think this monument is a good idea...'
     
    I think that I don't care what black people think.
    , @HallParvey
    @Robertson


    Joe Biden is damaging the Biden family name
     
    Impossible.
  12. It will be torn down one day just like they tore down our statues

    • Agree: Ron Mexico
    • Replies: @Evan drince
    @AndrewR

    I hope I live to see that day.

  13. Money, Mississippi is just too far off (to the west) of the Natchez Trace Parkway* to make a good side trip. Perhaps we’ll check it out on the way to the world’s biggest ball of yarn.

    .

    * A really nice drive, but fill up your car in Tupelo or Jackson, depending. Going south, I came into Jackson on fumes.

    • Replies: @Calvin Hobbes
    @Achmed E. Newman


    Money, Mississippi is just too far off (to the west) of the Natchez Trace Parkway* to make a good side trip. Perhaps we’ll check it out on the way to the world’s biggest ball of yarn.
     
    https://www.politico.com/news/2023/07/22/biden-will-establish-a-national-monument-honoring-emmett-till-the-black-teen-lynched-in-mississippi-00107716

    Biden will sign a proclamation on Tuesday to create the Emmett Till and Mamie Till-Mobley National Monument across three sites in Illinois and Mississippi, according to the official.

    The monument will protect places that are central to the story of Till’s life and death at age 14, the acquittal of his white killers and his mother’s activism.
    , @pyrrhus
    @Achmed E. Newman

    And you don't want to be in Jackson, MS for any reason....

    , @AnotherDad
    @Achmed E. Newman


    * A really nice drive, but fill up your car in Tupelo or Jackson, depending. Going south, I came into Jackson on fumes.
     
    Excellent advice.

    I've only done a little of the Natchez Trace 15 or so back and probably won't be doing much more as it does not naturally line up directionally with our Florida-to/from-world driving pattern. We did a day on the Blue Ridge Parkway when we headed north last summer.

    These national parkways are fun. You won't make freeway style speed/progress. But they are very pleasant drives. However, you really do need to fire up gas buddy or google or whatever the night before, find your reasonably priced and accessible gas stations, have a "gas plan" and execute it. There won't be a Buc-ee's or a Costco right off the parkway.
  14. President Trump or DeSantis ought to create a federal monument to the far more numerous (per capita) white victims of black violence. In the racial politics game, Dems are always on offense, so why can’t Republicans do the same?

    • Agree: Pastit
  15. National monument? It’ll become a national religious shrine. Compulsory worship, statements of faith, ex-communication and condemnation of non-believers, etc.

    Get ready for the UniParty to re-brand “Reparations” as “Repentarations”.

    • Agree: bomag
    • Replies: @Forbes
    @Voltarde

    They can put Till next to the George Floyd monument...

  16. Sorry to go all off the ranch OT but i just think everybody could use a bit of cheering up from the old days……

    Remember back when Madonna was fun, and not a pain in the ass?

    Part of the reason I’m putting this here is, even though I share a more bizarre spiritual kinship with La PJ, physically I grew up in the same place and time as Madonna, and i remember just how horrible everything was; so she found a way to do something kooky and pleasant and happy with all of that non-stop monstrosity, and so because she figured that out, and also made a freaking fortune out of doing it, what can I say? except, I dips me lid.

    Sorry everything else later got a bit too ka-razy, but ya gotta admit, at least the 80s were fun. And I can certainly tell you that your 1980s were a LOT more fun than my 1980s.

    • Replies: @Pat Hannagan
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    Ray of Light is easily Madonna's best song.

    Madonna has just left a fat festival of nasal piercings, a thousand bull pseudo cows with their ring pull, I swear to God if my eldest goes and gets a septum piercing I will not only disown her I will see to it I lure her "man" into drinking with me, take him on a road trip to McLaren Vale, attempt to watch some sports with him on TV, try to reason with him (does he even observe pronouns?),.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cVuETI4Pl0

    , @Legba
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    Remember back when Madonna was fun, and not a pain in the ass?

    Not at all. I remember her as the talentless slut that she still is.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @The Germ Theory of Disease

    , @Joe Stalin
    @The Germ Theory of Disease


    Miniature "GS."
     
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S97O_bbRyA0
    , @Richard B
    @The Germ Theory of Disease


    Remember back when Madonna was fun, and not a pain in the ass?
     
    Ah...Nope! Missed that one.

    But I did get a kick out of the fact that her songwriting partner was a big Gentle Giant fan. Didn't see that one coming. He's got good taste. Those guys knew what they were doing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HR5A385gWdE

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon

    , @RadicalCenter
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    As a father blessed with numerous daughters, let me say about the “star” of those videos: she was a slut and an exhibitionist back then, albeit a talented one, and she has remained such. “Madonna” has been a disgrace and a poor example to girls ever since then.

    May she change her ways, in sha Allah.

  17. anonymous[204] • Disclaimer says:

    You talk about blacks at least 10 times more than you talk about Jews. It’s not helping guide us out of the mess the country is in.

    • Agree: Colin Wright
    • Troll: Guest007
    • Replies: @Mike Tre
    @anonymous

    The MSM has their narrative, and Steve has his.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease

    , @J.Ross
    @anonymous

    This isn't blacks, this is Bai Dien speaking for the blacks to distract from his own party effectively saying they regret lying and election-interfering to get him up that long staircase. I would bet money that no normal black person wanted an Emmett Till monument.

    , @njguy73
    @anonymous

    Blacks are 13 percent of the population, Jews are 2.4 percent. Makes sense to me.

  18. This “Biden” administration is great!

    No seriously. The minoritarians when doing politics have usually lathered up their toxic ideology with all sorts “American” this or “working people” that. Now we have flat out 200 proof minoritarian administration–well except for senile old man on the bottle’s label–it’s just so much more openly “F U whitey!”

    Seriously, can we just separate already? I am so ready to get these blood sucking parasites off of my–and America’s–body.

    • Replies: @Ennui
    @AnotherDad

    What were the Puritans if not Minoritarians? The English and Dutch colonies were populated by minoritarian snowflakes. Victimization was pioneered by Irish Catholics and assorted Protestant groups in this country.


    If you want people with a healthy sense of collective, corporate identity, you'd need to settle in the French or Spanish colonies.

    Replies: @Prester John

  19. Sounds like this monument is only for Emmett Till. That seems disrespectful to all the other rapists in training who were violently denied the opportunity to perfect their craft.

    • Agree: Bardon Kaldian
    • Replies: @Ralph L
    @AnotherDad

    The Daily Mail says it also includes sites in Illinois honoring his mother.
    They only show pre-pubescent photos of Till, just like Trayvon.

    , @Jim Don Bob
    @AnotherDad

    Eldridge Cleaver is next.

    , @Kylie
    @AnotherDad

    "Sounds like this monument is only for Emmett Till. That seems disrespectful to all the other rapists in training who were violently denied the opportunity to perfect their craft."

    What about a monument to those who committed some truly monumental crimes?

    Letalvis D. Cobbins
    Lemaricus D. Davidson
    George Thomas
    Eric Boyd
    Vanessa Coleman

    , @Barnard
    @AnotherDad

    How many years away are we from forcing the Italians to put up a memorial to his father. The Army will make a payment to any remaining Till descendents.

  20. Politico:

    Biden will establish a national monument honoring Emmett Till, the Black teen lynched in Mississippi

    A complete monument should include a life-size gallows recreation of Louis Till hanging around. Call it “Till, we meet again”.

  21. This offers a fine opportunity for some Republican presidential hopeful to step up, and say he will rescind this monument upon taking office.

    That that Till is sad personal story of rude and crude teenager and a hotheaded husband and his brother taking murderous revenge, but 70 years after the fact is being used by minoritarian ideologues and Parasite Party hacks to spread this lie that blacks are oppressed and their problems are the fault of white people, rather than of their own making; basically in service of a bunch of racial lying designed to inflame racial tensions in order to keep blacks as a reliable Parasite Party vote bank. Disgusting stuff.

    • Agree: J.Ross, Bardon Kaldian, bomag
    • Replies: @CalCooledge
    @AnotherDad

    "rescind this monument upon taking office." I'll see ya and raise ya. Rescind the Holy Till Shrine, then MLK Day, then Juneteenth.

    It's past time for a counter-revolution on all the black worship. In world history, has any such destructive demographic received so much unwarranted praise and special privilege? I wish the Republicans wouldn't be so passive on this issue, and go on the offense for once (like the Left is, constantly).

    , @Jack D
    @AnotherDad

    Not a chance. This is a one way ratchet - Dems put stuff like this in place and then GOP maintains it. The chances of a rollback are zero. Are you some kind of racist or sumthin?

    And no your national separation is not happening. Stop fantasizing. Whiteland has as much chance of materializing as Wakanda.

    Goodness knows that for 100 years there were monuments throughout the South for traitorous generals (some still stand) who did not deserve them. Those generals got a lot of Americans killed for an unjust cause (the right to own other human beings). A Martian would say that it's nuts that we put up statues of those guys. Who won the Civil War? Do they have statues of Nazis in Germany?

    Till did not live long enough to kill anyone. He really was murdered for racist reasons and it's not wrong to have a monument to him. Yes, his character and what he did was questionable but he did not deserve death.

    Replies: @bomag, @Reg Cæsar, @res, @Wilkey, @Art Deco, @Reg Cæsar, @AceDeuce, @pyrrhus, @Alden, @AnotherDad, @AnotherDad, @Hypnotoad666, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @James N. Kennett

    , @Alden
    @AnotherDad

    Weren’t the actual physical killers two black employees of the Bryants??? Who cares, the death prevented him from producing more black rapists and murderers.

  22. Just a national monument? Why not a full-blown national park?

    • Replies: @Redneck Farmer
    @International Jew

    Too much green space frightens urban blacks.

    Replies: @Loyalty Over IQ Worship

    , @Herbert R. Tarlek, Jr.
    @International Jew

    Why not a full-blown national park?

    That takes an act of Congress. However, many of our national parks did start out as national monuments, including the world-famous Grand Canyon.

    I think that, in the unlikely event that this country doesn't completely fall apart within the next couple of decades, you will definitely see Congress act on this pressing issue of giving the young master Till his proper honors.

    Replies: @Mike Conrad

  23. @International Jew
    Just a national monument? Why not a full-blown national park?

    Replies: @Redneck Farmer, @Herbert R. Tarlek, Jr.

    Too much green space frightens urban blacks.

    • Agree: p38ace
    • Replies: @Loyalty Over IQ Worship
    @Redneck Farmer

    So, it's not wigger to make snide ethnic slurs against a group, yet simply being on the side of your own people is bad (if you're white)?

    It's the same old game: white people, don't you dare be on your own side.

  24. Joementia should send “Doctor Jill” to go down there for the grand opening and let nigro males rub up on her and talk sexual smack the enttire days as penance.

    Hey, and North America wasn’t the only continent enriched by Tills. Europe should pay tribute to rapey-killy Daddy Louis Till, who enriched Italy with his presence. A special section could be set up for fellow nigro rapey-killy GI Fred McMurray, who was with Till and was tried and hanged for the same offenses (one murder and two rapes).

    BTW LOL: Here’s how Cuckipedia leads off the article about Louis Till:

    Louis Till (February 7, 1922 – July 2, 1945) was an African American GI during World War II.

    LOL. Yeah, and Jeffrey Dahmer (1860-1994) was a “White candy factory worker and aspiring amateur chef.”

    Fun Fact: Louis Till was born in Cape Girardeau, Mo. which means that he and Rush Limbaugh were from the same hometown.

  25. Dragoslav [AKA "Lady Strange"] says:

    I wonder if it will be a monumental fiasco like the ridiculous statue for Martin Luther King and his spouse .

    • Replies: @anti_black_lib
    @Dragoslav

    Hopefully! It will be if they let a black design it. Which they will.

  26. Enough about lynching already. As everyone ought to know, lynching involves removal of an accused criminal from proper authorities by civilians. Till wasn’t accused of breaking any laws and he wasn’t in custody. Yeah, he was murdered. So were a lot of blacks who aren’t getting any recognition. The three civil rights workers murdered in Mississippi in 1964 (Cheney, Goodman, and Schwerner) were killed with the collusion of law enforcement. That was a lynching.

    • Replies: @Mike Tre
    @Dan Smith

    "The three civil rights workers"

    If we're going to speak in correct terms, then let's call these three what they really were: Invasive communist seditious provocateurs.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    , @Observator
    @Dan Smith

    “Tried in the Court of Judge Lynch” was a headline often used over reports in early newspapers of extra-judicial killings of criminal suspects. And there were many in the antebellum era which go unnoticed by 20th century racialists because the victims were virtually all white. Mormon founder Jo Smith was perhaps the most prominent, gunned down in 1844 by a vigilante mob as he tried to break out of jail.

    , @Achmed E. Newman
    @Dan Smith


    So were a lot of blacks who aren’t getting any recognition.
     
    So ARE a lot of Whites, multiple dozens monthly - see Daily Kenn posts. What were once lynchings are now random muggings-gone-wrong (with all apologies to The Doobies).
    , @AceDeuce
    @Dan Smith


    As everyone ought to know, lynching involves removal of an accused criminal from proper authorities by civilians
     
    Uh, no. Not necessarily. Not usually, in fact.

    There are many versions of lynch laws that vary in terms of technicalities, but the original gist of things is something like this, as found in Dictionary.com. Most seminal legal works have similar definitions.

    the administration of summary punishment, especially death, upon a suspected, accused, or convicted person by a mob acting without legal process or authority.
     
    https://www.dictionary.com/browse/lynch-law
    , @NotAnonymousHere
    @Dan Smith

    #15 @Dan Smith:


    As everyone ought to know, lynching involves removal of an accused criminal from proper authorities by civilians.
     
    No one knows that because it's not true. You suck.

    Replies: @Dan Smith, @Art Deco

    , @G. Poulin
    @Dan Smith

    Good riddance to the three communist "civil rights workers". Too bad they didn't get them all.

  27. I propose a national holiday. How about “Till Tuesday”?

    • Replies: @tyrone
    @Peter Frankfurter


    I propose a national holiday. How about “Till Tuesday”?
     
    ...Pipe down , voices carry.
    , @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Peter Frankfurter


    I propose a national holiday. How about “Till Tuesday”?
     
    Good day for aim-y Mannlichers.

    https://gundigest.com/wp-content/uploads/Steyr-Scout-Rifle-6.5-Creedmoor-10.jpg

    https://www.pewpewtactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Mannlicher-Scout.jpg

    Replies: @Herbert R. Tarlek, Jr., @The Alarmist

    , @Wilkey
    @Peter Frankfurter


    I propose a national holiday. How about “Till Tuesday”?
     
    Which Congress will immediately designate be celebrated on Monday, as they do, so that federal employees can have yet another three day weekend.

    Replies: @kaganovitch

    , @Dr. Krieger
    @Peter Frankfurter

    He wants me
    But only part of the time

    He wants me
    If he can keep me in line

  28. Great, more statues of Asians

    • Agree: p38ace
  29. @anonymous
    You talk about blacks at least 10 times more than you talk about Jews. It's not helping guide us out of the mess the country is in.

    Replies: @Mike Tre, @J.Ross, @njguy73

    The MSM has their narrative, and Steve has his.

    • Agree: Forbes, mark green
    • Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Mike Tre

    Well, as David Mamet once famously said at his Loeb lecture, when confronted by an audience member with a little-bit-too-sticky of a question...

    "Hey, you work your side of the street, lady, and I'll work mine."

    Didn't answer or solve the problem, but on the other hand it did get a good laugh, and sometimes that turns out to be the best solution.

    I was always sort of a teensy bit steamed at Brustein that he never invited Elizabeth LeComte or Ron Vawter to come say a few baffling things. He seemed oblivious to the giant influence that the Wooster Group was having on the rest of us, much more so than Mamet or Sam Shepard.

  30. @Peter Frankfurter
    I propose a national holiday. How about "Till Tuesday"?

    Replies: @tyrone, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Wilkey, @Dr. Krieger

    I propose a national holiday. How about “Till Tuesday”?

    …Pipe down , voices carry.

    • LOL: Ron Mexico
  31. @Dan Smith
    Enough about lynching already. As everyone ought to know, lynching involves removal of an accused criminal from proper authorities by civilians. Till wasn't accused of breaking any laws and he wasn't in custody. Yeah, he was murdered. So were a lot of blacks who aren't getting any recognition. The three civil rights workers murdered in Mississippi in 1964 (Cheney, Goodman, and Schwerner) were killed with the collusion of law enforcement. That was a lynching.

    Replies: @Mike Tre, @Observator, @Achmed E. Newman, @AceDeuce, @NotAnonymousHere, @G. Poulin

    “The three civil rights workers”

    If we’re going to speak in correct terms, then let’s call these three what they really were: Invasive communist seditious provocateurs.

    • Agree: Gordo, p38ace
    • Troll: Corvinus
    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @Mike Tre


    If we’re going to speak in correct terms, then let’s call these three what they really were: Invasive communist seditious provocateurs.
     
    Like Rachel Corrie?

    Replies: @Pixo

  32. @International Jew
    Just a national monument? Why not a full-blown national park?

    Replies: @Redneck Farmer, @Herbert R. Tarlek, Jr.

    Why not a full-blown national park?

    That takes an act of Congress. However, many of our national parks did start out as national monuments, including the world-famous Grand Canyon.

    I think that, in the unlikely event that this country doesn’t completely fall apart within the next couple of decades, you will definitely see Congress act on this pressing issue of giving the young master Till his proper honors.

    • Replies: @Mike Conrad
    @Herbert R. Tarlek, Jr.


    I think that, in the unlikely event that this country doesn’t completely fall apart within the next couple of decades, you will definitely see Congress act on this pressing issue of giving the young master Till his proper honors.
     
    Long before that, they'll rain millions down upon his extended family. If St.George (pbuh) was worth $23 million, how much would Till be worth?
  33. @AnotherDad
    Sounds like this monument is only for Emmett Till. That seems disrespectful to all the other rapists in training who were violently denied the opportunity to perfect their craft.

    Replies: @Ralph L, @Jim Don Bob, @Kylie, @Barnard

    The Daily Mail says it also includes sites in Illinois honoring his mother.
    They only show pre-pubescent photos of Till, just like Trayvon.

  34. If only someone was interested in what Cities with soaring crime rates have in common they might look at Oakland

  35. @anonymous
    You talk about blacks at least 10 times more than you talk about Jews. It's not helping guide us out of the mess the country is in.

    Replies: @Mike Tre, @J.Ross, @njguy73

    This isn’t blacks, this is Bai Dien speaking for the blacks to distract from his own party effectively saying they regret lying and election-interfering to get him up that long staircase. I would bet money that no normal black person wanted an Emmett Till monument.

  36. “the monument will protect places”……….Politico actually said that ?how pray tell do monuments do that?…….voodoo?

  37. @Peter Frankfurter
    I propose a national holiday. How about "Till Tuesday"?

    Replies: @tyrone, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Wilkey, @Dr. Krieger

    I propose a national holiday. How about “Till Tuesday”?

    Good day for aim-y Mannlichers.

    [MORE]

    • Thanks: Redneck Farmer
    • Replies: @Herbert R. Tarlek, Jr.
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Good day for aim-y Mannlichers.

    "Microwave some more pizza rolls and bring 'em down to the basement, mom! Talkin' guns and gear with the guys on Unz is hungry work!"

    https://i.ibb.co/NV8dFpr/images.jpg

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Jenner Ickham Errican

    , @The Alarmist
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Hush hush .... don’t give them any ideas....


    https://youtu.be/uejh-bHa4To

  38. @Redneck Farmer
    @International Jew

    Too much green space frightens urban blacks.

    Replies: @Loyalty Over IQ Worship

    So, it’s not wigger to make snide ethnic slurs against a group, yet simply being on the side of your own people is bad (if you’re white)?

    It’s the same old game: white people, don’t you dare be on your own side.

  39. @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Peter Frankfurter


    I propose a national holiday. How about “Till Tuesday”?
     
    Good day for aim-y Mannlichers.

    https://gundigest.com/wp-content/uploads/Steyr-Scout-Rifle-6.5-Creedmoor-10.jpg

    https://www.pewpewtactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Mannlicher-Scout.jpg

    Replies: @Herbert R. Tarlek, Jr., @The Alarmist

    Good day for aim-y Mannlichers.

    “Microwave some more pizza rolls and bring ’em down to the basement, mom! Talkin’ guns and gear with the guys on Unz is hungry work!”

    • Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Herbert R. Tarlek, Jr.



    Good day for aim-y Mannlichers.
     
    Talkin’ guns and gear with the guys on Unz is hungry work!
     
    Poor Oyb, probably didn’t get the pun. :(

    fat_guy.jpg
     
    Obviously, my comments aren’t that of a fat person. You, however, are tellingly food-obsessed:

    “Microwave some more pizza rolls and bring ’em down to the basement, mom!
     
    That’s some compelling original content, Oyb. Have you finally acquired gainful employment or are you still a self-described “starving peasant”? (The hunger is real!) Sounds like you want to move into your “mom’s basement” rather than live whatever melodrama is happening with you out in the desert:

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/a-compromise-between-affordable-housing-and-nimbyism/#comment-5909046 (#105, etc.)


    I merely think that private developers should be allowed to build housing on their own property that people like me can afford to rent so that I won’t be sleeping on a fucking park bench. It’s pretty clear that you are the Antoinette, here, and I the starving peasant. [e.a.]
     
    So which is it? Am I as rich as Marie Antoinette, or living in my “mom’s basement”? (Or… both??) You’re just a confused envious lefty, crying poormouth and fantasizing about left-wing revolution in the most cringe way possible:

    As a downscale white (or more likely, "fellow white" YIMBY?) who has really been hurt by the housing crisis, I think NIMBY homeowners need to be told to sit down and shut up. This country is headed for a second French Revolution [e.a.] if we don’t do something about this housing crisis soon.
     

    That attitude worked well for the Bourbons–until it didn’t.
     

    You will allow housing to be built for people like me or you will eventually face the guillotines.

    ‘Simple as.

    Enjoy your ill-gotten appreciation on your single-family home while you can, Marie Antoinette.
     

    LOL, who’s the tough-guy revolutionary now?

    Oyb: “DOWN WITH SINGLE-FAMILY ZONING! KILL HOMEOWNERS! RAWR!”

    This you?

    Twitter’s Woke Left Sans-Culotte LARPers


    https://tac.imgix.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/0c79890cf40e6947fea3701103dc1e62-1.jpg

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican

    , @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Herbert R. Tarlek, Jr.

    For the edification of the iSteve community, a rundown on schizo left-wing ‘anarchist’ commenter “Herbert R. Tarlek, Jr.” (henceforth referred to as “Oyb”) who has recently decided to awkwardly project some of his, er, shortcomings onto yours truly. Examples from his first year of commenting (starting 2021) are below.


    caption: OBSESSED WITH PREPARING FOR APOCALYPSE
     
    Oyb, who is (pretending to be?) triggered by my occasional gun/combat references, earlier agreed with another commenter’s “survivalist” take:

    https://www.unz.com/aanglin/qanon-shaman-sentenced-to-41-months-for-trespassing/#comment-5012372

    Get out of the cities. Find a hidey-hole in a red rural area. Stock up on dried goods and water. Become proficient with at least one firearm. Network with your new neighbors. Avoid government agents and snitches; you’ll know who they are because they’ll be the clowns pushing “violent insurrection.”
     
    OTOH, Oyb on civilians fighting the US government:

    https://www.unz.com/estriker/gay-activist-us-army-staff-sergeant-fantasizes-about-oppressing-right-wing-americans-in-viral-video/#comment-4870221

    Understand that if active duty military actually get deployed within the United States, you’ll be outnumbered by armed, pissed-off citizens about a thousand to one. You couldn’t hold Afghanistan, what makes you think you’re going to hold Arizona or Texas or Montana, you delusional, dyke-bitten bitch?
     
    Oyb going all ACAB about “pigs” like a leftist / anarchist / edgy “F.U. dad!” teen:

    https://www.unz.com/audio/jtaylor_already-a-record-year-for-police-ambushes/#comment-4845485

    Agreed. Antifa vermin just burned down half the country and the best we could hope for was that these pigs [e.a.] just stand there playing with themselves instead of arresting Antifa’s victims merely for defending themselves. They are, at best, useless.

    Any conservative/WN who still supports the police is so stupid he shouldn’t be let out of bed in the morning without a helmet on. This is not your country any longer and it’s police are not your police.
     

    https://www.unz.com/estriker/georgia-republican-attorney-general-indicts-prosecutor-for-not-charging-white-men-who-shot-black-criminal-in-self-defense-fast-enough/#comment-4882244

    One of then was a pig and no doubt would have obeyed orders to arrest Rittenhouse or steal the McCloskeys’ guns if he were the one who received those orders. He also would have arrested any of us on any trumped-up charge he was ordered to.

    This is another nig vs. pig conflict, a fight that we have no dog in. Screw these two. It’s time they were time they were devoured by the justice [sic] system and reaped what they’ve sown, just like Chauvin.
     
    Here, strangely, Oyb makes a lengthy deviation from his anti-“pig” hate in the example of the Black cop shooting and killing Ashley Babbit, of which he approves:

    https://www.unz.com/pbuchanan/who-and-what-is-tearing-the-us-apart/#comment-4902446 (#39, etc.)

    I have no great love of the current system, nor am I being hypocritical–I think lots and lots of antifa should have been shot dead by pigs over the last year–but I gotta agree here. The woman was a member of a mob that was trying to crawl through a window that another member of the mob had broken just moments before, headed toward the House chamber where congressmaggots were cowering under their chairs.
     
    Oyb back on his regular edgy anarchist anti-(White) cop hate:

    https://www.unz.com/jderbyshire/the-arbery-show-trial-begins-more-human-sacrifices-to-appease-the-blm-gods/?showcomments#comment-4968610

    McMichael being a retired pig, I got no dog in this fight. I hate, loathe and despise pigs every bit as much as niggers. They’re not our friends, and if you think they are, you’re so stupid you shouldn’t be let out of bed in the morning without a helmet on.
     
    Oyb thinks if he writes “niggers” he’ll fool us into thinking he’s right-wing and pro-White, but he likes it when Black cops shoot unarmed Whites. Interesting. A pattern emerges with his comments…

    Oyb with derivative anti-American edgelord takes:

    https://www.unz.com/aanglin/so-are-we-doing-this-war-with-china-or-what/?showcomments#comment-4920857

    The U.S. would get its ass kicked in a war with China, which is precisely why I support one.
     

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/americans-are-getting-lazier/#comment-5000732

    Until then, as far as I am concerned, it’s nothing but a form of ritual humiliation of the working class that Ameritards [e.a.] are stupid to put up with.
     
    Oyb hates White cops and “Ameritards” and homeowners, but (surprise!) thinks Jews unfairly get a bad rap:

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/is-systemic-racism-particularly-non-systemic/#comment-5141988

    Jews have been at the forefront of many things, both good and bad. One might argue, plausibly, that this is simply a function of thier higher intelligence.

    When they talk about Jews, white gentiles who are hard-core anti-semites sound a lot like Al Sharpton talking about white gentiles, only their arguments at least rise to the level of speciousness.

    I have never really been a true believer in anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.
     
    Oddly, in an exchange between Oyb, Corvinus, and an “anon”, Oyb takes theatrical umbrage at being identified as a Jew, even though no one had done so…

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/super-bowl-commercials/#comment-5177647 (#101)

    Corvinus says:

    “Whites are no longer prestigious but reviled.”

    It’s more that us whites see things in a new way by our own accord, much to your chagrin. Out with the old. It can be quite a shock to the system; thankfully, COVID has done wonders for taking your kind out to the woodshed.
     

    anon[122] says:

    It’s more that us whites

    “my fellow Whites…”
     

    Herbert R. Tarlek, Jr. says:

    Well isn’t this special. For the first time I’ve been misidentified as a Jew by the Jew-obsessed morons around here. [e.a.] I suppose it was bound to happen sooner or later. As any Unz thread approaches infinity, the possibility of some poster being falsely accused of being a Jew approaches 1. Call It Tarlek’s law.
     
    Heh. Oyb seems to have been expecting the “fellow white” suspicion from the start (and responded as if he is the accused Corvinus!). Hmmm.

    Based on all of the above, my guess is that Oyb is a Jew or mischling, instinctively hostile to White social and government power (single-family zoning, police authority, etc.) and is trying to ingratiate himself here by making basic-bitch noises about Blacks and antifa as cover to push an anti-White, anti-American agenda. Ladies and gentlemen, mock this snake at every turn from here on out.
  40. @AnotherDad
    Sounds like this monument is only for Emmett Till. That seems disrespectful to all the other rapists in training who were violently denied the opportunity to perfect their craft.

    Replies: @Ralph L, @Jim Don Bob, @Kylie, @Barnard

    Eldridge Cleaver is next.

  41. @The Germ Theory of Disease
    Sorry to go all off the ranch OT but i just think everybody could use a bit of cheering up from the old days......


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIcb7MnCkLs


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3ov9USxVxY

    Remember back when Madonna was fun, and not a pain in the ass?


    Part of the reason I'm putting this here is, even though I share a more bizarre spiritual kinship with La PJ, physically I grew up in the same place and time as Madonna, and i remember just how horrible everything was; so she found a way to do something kooky and pleasant and happy with all of that non-stop monstrosity, and so because she figured that out, and also made a freaking fortune out of doing it, what can I say? except, I dips me lid.

    Sorry everything else later got a bit too ka-razy, but ya gotta admit, at least the 80s were fun. And I can certainly tell you that your 1980s were a LOT more fun than my 1980s.

    Replies: @Pat Hannagan, @Legba, @Joe Stalin, @Richard B, @RadicalCenter

    Ray of Light is easily Madonna’s best song.

    Madonna has just left a fat festival of nasal piercings, a thousand bull pseudo cows with their ring pull, I swear to God if my eldest goes and gets a septum piercing I will not only disown her I will see to it I lure her “man” into drinking with me, take him on a road trip to McLaren Vale, attempt to watch some sports with him on TV, try to reason with him (does he even observe pronouns?),.

  42. If Emmet Till hadn’t sexually harassed that woman, none of this would have happened.;)

    • Agree: AceDeuce
    • Replies: @Mike Conrad
    @anti_black_lib

    Believe All Women ...but only when they accuse white men.

  43. @Dan Smith
    Enough about lynching already. As everyone ought to know, lynching involves removal of an accused criminal from proper authorities by civilians. Till wasn't accused of breaking any laws and he wasn't in custody. Yeah, he was murdered. So were a lot of blacks who aren't getting any recognition. The three civil rights workers murdered in Mississippi in 1964 (Cheney, Goodman, and Schwerner) were killed with the collusion of law enforcement. That was a lynching.

    Replies: @Mike Tre, @Observator, @Achmed E. Newman, @AceDeuce, @NotAnonymousHere, @G. Poulin

    “Tried in the Court of Judge Lynch” was a headline often used over reports in early newspapers of extra-judicial killings of criminal suspects. And there were many in the antebellum era which go unnoticed by 20th century racialists because the victims were virtually all white. Mormon founder Jo Smith was perhaps the most prominent, gunned down in 1844 by a vigilante mob as he tried to break out of jail.

  44. @Dragoslav
    I wonder if it will be a monumental fiasco like the ridiculous statue for Martin Luther King and his spouse .

    Replies: @anti_black_lib

    Hopefully! It will be if they let a black design it. Which they will.

    • Agree: Dragoslav
  45. Oh, and by the way, MLK was a rapist, just like Till’s father, who was hanged for it in WWII. And probably, just like Till would’ve become if he’d been allowed to live. I guess the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree!

    • Agree: Pastit
  46. Statues can be removed, all it takes is a little organisation and a little willpower.

    If the blue haired unwashed tattooed spiteful mutants of the left can manage it so can we.

  47. @Achmed E. Newman
    Money, Mississippi is just too far off (to the west) of the Natchez Trace Parkway* to make a good side trip. Perhaps we'll check it out on the way to the world's biggest ball of yarn.

    .

    * A really nice drive, but fill up your car in Tupelo or Jackson, depending. Going south, I came into Jackson on fumes.

    Replies: @Calvin Hobbes, @pyrrhus, @AnotherDad

    Money, Mississippi is just too far off (to the west) of the Natchez Trace Parkway* to make a good side trip. Perhaps we’ll check it out on the way to the world’s biggest ball of yarn.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2023/07/22/biden-will-establish-a-national-monument-honoring-emmett-till-the-black-teen-lynched-in-mississippi-00107716

    Biden will sign a proclamation on Tuesday to create the Emmett Till and Mamie Till-Mobley National Monument across three sites in Illinois and Mississippi, according to the official.

    The monument will protect places that are central to the story of Till’s life and death at age 14, the acquittal of his white killers and his mother’s activism.

  48. It’s interesting how doing something symbolic for blacks has been a sure-fire way to rally the base for Democrats for decades. The left’s relationship with this demographic can truly be described as religious in nature.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Arclight

    This is part and parcel of politics in an ethnically or racially divided country. Big city politics in America has operated this way since the 19th century. Biden owes his office to the blacks of the South and of course he wants to repay them politically. He makes no secret of this. Biden being Biden he sometimes says the quiet part out loud.


    Republicans only WISH that they had a solid base of 90+% R voters that they could pander to. As pandering goes, this is gonna be cheap.

    Replies: @bomag, @Arclight, @Mr. Anon

  49. The Ancient Greeks had the Oracle at Delphi, we get the Oracle at Till.

    Tragedy first, then farce.

  50. He was crime victim. Very unfortunate for him and his family, but there’s nothing to honor in that. Let his friends and relations put flowers on his grave. It doesn’t involve the rest of us.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Art Deco

    This was not some random crime - a robbery gone wrong, a drunken bar brawl. The crime was only possible in the context of the Jim Crow system. His crime fundamentally was that he did not "know his place". The killing was not just personal to Till and his family but was part and parcel of a system designed to keep blacks in their place at the bottom of a racial hierarchy. His killers were not punished for their crime because of this hierarchy. So to pretend that this had nothing to do with anyone or anything else is just false.

    Replies: @Forbes, @Art Deco, @Colin Wright, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Anonymous Jew, @The Anti-Gnostic

  51. @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Peter Frankfurter


    I propose a national holiday. How about “Till Tuesday”?
     
    Good day for aim-y Mannlichers.

    https://gundigest.com/wp-content/uploads/Steyr-Scout-Rifle-6.5-Creedmoor-10.jpg

    https://www.pewpewtactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Mannlicher-Scout.jpg

    Replies: @Herbert R. Tarlek, Jr., @The Alarmist

    Hush hush …. don’t give them any ideas….

  52. @Reg Cæsar
    Cue the Vogues!


    Till the moon deserts the sky...
    Till all the seas run dry...
    Till then I'll worship you...
    Till the tropic sun grows cold...
    Till this young world grows old...


    You are my reason to live...


    Till, the rivers flow upstream...
    Till lovers cease to dream...
    Till then I'm yours...


    Their other big hit was "Turn Around, Look at Me", a most fitting title for every "fringe" of the coalition.



    https://youtu.be/fvK5ebF1VH4

    Replies: @Ganderson

    I was always partial to “5 o’clock World”- I reminds me of me as a kid riding my bike from St.Paul over to Lake Nokomis on a hot summer day…

  53. @Peter Frankfurter
    I propose a national holiday. How about "Till Tuesday"?

    Replies: @tyrone, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Wilkey, @Dr. Krieger

    I propose a national holiday. How about “Till Tuesday”?

    Which Congress will immediately designate be celebrated on Monday, as they do, so that federal employees can have yet another three day weekend.

    • Replies: @kaganovitch
    @Wilkey


    Which Congress will immediately designate be celebrated on Monday, as they do, so that federal employees can have yet another three day weekend.
     
    Maybe that's not such a bad thing. The more they're off perhaps the better. As the Talmud has it, "Sleep for the wicked is a benefit to them and a benefit to the World."

    Replies: @Wilkey

  54. @AnotherDad
    This offers a fine opportunity for some Republican presidential hopeful to step up, and say he will rescind this monument upon taking office.

    That that Till is sad personal story of rude and crude teenager and a hotheaded husband and his brother taking murderous revenge, but 70 years after the fact is being used by minoritarian ideologues and Parasite Party hacks to spread this lie that blacks are oppressed and their problems are the fault of white people, rather than of their own making; basically in service of a bunch of racial lying designed to inflame racial tensions in order to keep blacks as a reliable Parasite Party vote bank. Disgusting stuff.

    Replies: @CalCooledge, @Jack D, @Alden

    “rescind this monument upon taking office.” I’ll see ya and raise ya. Rescind the Holy Till Shrine, then MLK Day, then Juneteenth.

    It’s past time for a counter-revolution on all the black worship. In world history, has any such destructive demographic received so much unwarranted praise and special privilege? I wish the Republicans wouldn’t be so passive on this issue, and go on the offense for once (like the Left is, constantly).

  55. @Dan Smith
    Enough about lynching already. As everyone ought to know, lynching involves removal of an accused criminal from proper authorities by civilians. Till wasn't accused of breaking any laws and he wasn't in custody. Yeah, he was murdered. So were a lot of blacks who aren't getting any recognition. The three civil rights workers murdered in Mississippi in 1964 (Cheney, Goodman, and Schwerner) were killed with the collusion of law enforcement. That was a lynching.

    Replies: @Mike Tre, @Observator, @Achmed E. Newman, @AceDeuce, @NotAnonymousHere, @G. Poulin

    So were a lot of blacks who aren’t getting any recognition.

    So ARE a lot of Whites, multiple dozens monthly – see Daily Kenn posts. What were once lynchings are now random muggings-gone-wrong (with all apologies to The Doobies).

  56. @Wilkey
    @Peter Frankfurter


    I propose a national holiday. How about “Till Tuesday”?
     
    Which Congress will immediately designate be celebrated on Monday, as they do, so that federal employees can have yet another three day weekend.

    Replies: @kaganovitch

    Which Congress will immediately designate be celebrated on Monday, as they do, so that federal employees can have yet another three day weekend.

    Maybe that’s not such a bad thing. The more they’re off perhaps the better. As the Talmud has it, “Sleep for the wicked is a benefit to them and a benefit to the World.”

    • Replies: @Wilkey
    @kaganovitch

    Sounds great in theory, but increasing the number of paid federal holidays doesn’t seem to be decreasing the damage being done.

    We’ve added two new paid federal holidays in my lifetime - both celebrating America’s most thoughtful and productive demographic - yet this country is now nearly broke.

    Replies: @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY)

  57. @Dan Smith
    Enough about lynching already. As everyone ought to know, lynching involves removal of an accused criminal from proper authorities by civilians. Till wasn't accused of breaking any laws and he wasn't in custody. Yeah, he was murdered. So were a lot of blacks who aren't getting any recognition. The three civil rights workers murdered in Mississippi in 1964 (Cheney, Goodman, and Schwerner) were killed with the collusion of law enforcement. That was a lynching.

    Replies: @Mike Tre, @Observator, @Achmed E. Newman, @AceDeuce, @NotAnonymousHere, @G. Poulin

    As everyone ought to know, lynching involves removal of an accused criminal from proper authorities by civilians

    Uh, no. Not necessarily. Not usually, in fact.

    There are many versions of lynch laws that vary in terms of technicalities, but the original gist of things is something like this, as found in Dictionary.com. Most seminal legal works have similar definitions.

    the administration of summary punishment, especially death, upon a suspected, accused, or convicted person by a mob acting without legal process or authority.

    https://www.dictionary.com/browse/lynch-law

  58. Joementia should send “Doctor Jill” to go down there for the grand opening and she can let negro males rub up on her and talk sexual smack, a la young Emmett, to her for the entire day as penance.

    Hey, and North America wasn’t the only continent enriched by the Till family. Europe should pay tribute to rapey-killy Daddy Louis Till, who enriched Italy with his presence. A special section could be set up for fellow negro rapey-killy GI Fred McMurray, who was with Till and was tried and hanged for the same offenses (one murder and two rapes).

    BTW LOL: Here’s how Cuckipedia leads off the article about Louis Till:

    Louis Till (February 7, 1922 – July 2, 1945) was an African American GI during World War II.

    LOL. Yeah, and Jeffrey Dahmer (1960-1994) was a “White candy factory worker and aspiring amateur chef.”

    Fun Fact: Louis Till was born in Cape Girardeau, Mo. which means that he and Rush Limbaugh were from the same hometown.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @AceDeuce

    He was born in New Madrid, Mo, about 50 miles from Cape Girardeau.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @AceDeuce

  59. In Washington, DC, the town that Franklin, Earl and Lyndon built, a local theater company announced a few years ago that it would present, not a play about Emmett Till, but an entire trilogy of plays about Till. Apparently Till had ascended to the firmament, joining the protagonists of Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides.

    • LOL: Liza
  60. @AnotherDad
    This offers a fine opportunity for some Republican presidential hopeful to step up, and say he will rescind this monument upon taking office.

    That that Till is sad personal story of rude and crude teenager and a hotheaded husband and his brother taking murderous revenge, but 70 years after the fact is being used by minoritarian ideologues and Parasite Party hacks to spread this lie that blacks are oppressed and their problems are the fault of white people, rather than of their own making; basically in service of a bunch of racial lying designed to inflame racial tensions in order to keep blacks as a reliable Parasite Party vote bank. Disgusting stuff.

    Replies: @CalCooledge, @Jack D, @Alden

    Not a chance. This is a one way ratchet – Dems put stuff like this in place and then GOP maintains it. The chances of a rollback are zero. Are you some kind of racist or sumthin?

    And no your national separation is not happening. Stop fantasizing. Whiteland has as much chance of materializing as Wakanda.

    Goodness knows that for 100 years there were monuments throughout the South for traitorous generals (some still stand) who did not deserve them. Those generals got a lot of Americans killed for an unjust cause (the right to own other human beings). A Martian would say that it’s nuts that we put up statues of those guys. Who won the Civil War? Do they have statues of Nazis in Germany?

    Till did not live long enough to kill anyone. He really was murdered for racist reasons and it’s not wrong to have a monument to him. Yes, his character and what he did was questionable but he did not deserve death.

    • Disagree: Colin Wright
    • Troll: AndrewR
    • Replies: @bomag
    @Jack D


    He really was murdered for racist reasons and it’s not wrong to have a monument to him.
     
    Then there is a line of people waiting for a monument; plenty of them White.
    , @Reg Cæsar
    @Jack D


    Who won the Civil War?
     
    A walking tour of the north half of your city will quickly answer that question!

    Goodness knows that for 100 years there were monuments throughout the South for traitorous generals...
     
    Such as Benjamin Lincoln? Careful with that broad brush...



    https://www.hmdb.org/Photos1/118/Photo118358.jpg?11252005
    , @res
    @Jack D


    He really was murdered for racist reasons and it’s not wrong to have a monument to him.
     
    If that is the standard there will be many monuments. In history how many people have been murdered because they were part of an outgroup and behaving badly? As you note the scandalous part is more that his killers got off scot-free.

    How do you feel about the (double?) standard that monuments to Robert E Lee (etc.) are beyond the pale? (rereading your comment I guess you answered that in the earlier part, interesting how many of those traitors served the US honorably in the Mexican War and years leading up to the Civil War)

    Replies: @Wilkey, @Dmon, @Mike Tre

    , @Wilkey
    @Jack D


    Goodness knows that for 100 years there were monuments throughout the South for traitorous generals (some still stand) who did not deserve them.
     
    Those generals weren’t traitorous. They were generals who were from a part of the country that wanted to leave the United States but was kept in at gunpoint, and at great loss of life.

    I’m no fan of the “Lost Cause,” and think the war was a horrible waste in defense of a really bad system. But calling Confederate generals traitors is just obnoxiously stupid.

    The war ended 158 years ago. Let people have their heroes and make peace with the past and move on.

    Replies: @pyrrhus

    , @Art Deco
    @Jack D

    who did not deserve them.
    ==
    You don't understand what ordinary people value.

    Replies: @Jack D

    , @Reg Cæsar
    @Jack D


    He really was murdered for racist reasons...
     
    We don't know that, and we can't. Had this been the local sheriff's son, they would have acted differently. But what if a mouthy white Chicago kid had done the same? Would he have been killed as well? Maybe, maybe not. (Depends on their view of "Yankees".) We don't know.

    But we can be sure that in such a case, the jury would have "deliberated" a bit longer. We forget (or aren't told) that the real scandal to mid-1950s Americans wasn't the crime itself, but the offhand exoneration.

    Similar to how the draft-card burners a decade later weren't protesting the draft itself, but the war. (They weren't being cowards, they were being politicians.) What looks like a minor detail can alter one's view of the entire situation.

    Replies: @CBart, @Jack D, @Anonymous

    , @AceDeuce
    @Jack D


    Till did not live long enough to kill anyone. He really was murdered for racist reasons and it’s not wrong to have a monument to him. Yes, his character and what he did was questionable but he did not deserve death.
     
    Tell you what, Cuck Wuck-if the same thing happened-the EXACT same thing happened-except that a White teen sexually assaulted a married negro female, and her negro husband took care of business the same way, I bet you'd be just fine with it.

    "Little punk found out! You don't mess with A BLACK MAN'S woman!!!" you'd say, as your Vienna sausage got tumescent in your pleated Dockers.

    , @pyrrhus
    @Jack D

    Well, since every sovereign State had the right to secede, which was conceded at the time of ratification and afterward, Generals defending that right against a Lincoln dictatorship were anythibg except treasonous...

    , @Alden
    @Jack D

    The killing of Emmett Till was eugenic. How many rapist sons grandsons and great grandsons would he have left as his criminal rapist legacy had he lived.

    Back in the 1930s a study began to discover if rape was a genetic thing. Rape victims who got pregnant with boys who kept and raised the sons of the rapists were contacted. The mothers promised to allow the researchers to follow their sons for life.

    1930s 40s when all the intellectuals and not really experts believed in nurture may nature. The researchers obtained a variety of mothers and sons from different regions economic status ethnicities religion etc to obtain a large number of subjects.

    The results of the study was amazing. By age 25, 40 percent of the sons of rapists had been convicted not just accused of rape. By 30 even more had been convicted of rape.

    Genetics and DNA rule. It’s a good thing the inherited Till rapist gene was removed from the gene pool.

    Replies: @res

    , @AnotherDad
    @Jack D

    Oh boy, you're in fine minoritarian narrative spinning this morning there Jack. Whitey be racist oppressors. You should write for the NYT.

    --


    traitorous generals
     
    I'm a republican. I'm for a nation of free high wage/high productivity people governing themselves. I've got zero use for slavery, serfdom, nor the "must have immigration!" cheap labor shills--any of their sleazy ideologies or systems. That goes for the Confederacy.

    But these generals were following along with what their states had decided--to leave the Union. I think their system is vile and backward and secession was stupid, but they were loyal to the people in their states and communities who had voted in secession. And fighting a Union army seeking to overthrow that decision by invading their states.

    Compare to our "elite" of "must have immigration!" shills, intentionally selling out and trashing the future of the American people and their posterity. Those scum are actually disloyal and truly "traitorous" to the people and nation they owe loyalty to.

    --


    He really was murdered for racist reasons
     
    Till was not murdered randomly. He was murdered for putting his hands on another man's wife--or at least scaring the bejesus out of her so she went running to car for her gun. This sort of stuff has led to plenty of beatings and murders down through the ages. The he was black--and a apparently stubbornly unrepentant--along with the low character of Roy Bryant and his half brother were what juiced this to murder. And yes, the racial context of Jim Crow--not wanting to tell blacks that Till's behavior would be tolerated--was what got Bryant and Milam off.

    But this was hardly, like "these black guys have taken our jobs" or "we don't like these people and are going to run them out of town" murder. It was a husband's very personal beef with Till's crude behavior toward his wife.

    --


    and it’s not wrong to have a monument to him.

     

    Wow. The Asians are going to claim a whole bunch of these "racist reasons murder" national monuments. But I think I'll stick with my gal Kylie and drag the grandkids to The Channon Christian and Christopher Newsome Racist Murder National Monument (the CCCNRMNM). I look forward to the "Biden" administration announcing that.

    Replies: @Hypnotoad666, @Ed Case, @Pirate King of Arkansas

    , @AnotherDad
    @Jack D


    And no your national separation is not happening. Stop fantasizing. Whiteland has as much chance of materializing as Wakanda.
     
    It's not "whiteland" but "America"--a nation for normal productive non-nutty Americans ... who are loyal to America. But otherwise, yeah. On this one, sadly, here you are most likely right.

    But it is still something to worth wishing for, working for--and if it comes to it--fighting for. Ordinary Americans deserve to have a nation of normal productive self-governing Americans who value the old sane stuff like "borders" and "rule of law" and are loyal to each other and "to ourselves our posterity".

    (And while the minoritarians don not deserve a nation ... to achieve separation, they need to get one. And I would be happy to see it ... just to enjoy the shit show! Parasites without a host. LOL.)


    But yeah, our likely future is "slumping toward Brazil". We'll have Holocaust Memorials and Emmett Till National Monuments and Stonewall Memorials and Lea Thomas Statues and kindergarten tranny story hour and "Reparations" as Africans swarm across our "nation of immigrants" memorial political boundary line ("border" being racist) ... while the Chinese do eugenic genetic engineering and engineer race targeted bioweapons.

    My grandkids will sure as hell wish they could live in my fantasy.

    Replies: @Pixo, @Legba, @Jim Don Bob, @Ennui

    , @Hypnotoad666
    @Jack D


    A Martian would say that it’s nuts that we put up statues of those guys. Who won the Civil War? Do they have statues of Nazis in Germany?
     
    So your point is that blacks have won their civil war against white people, so it's only right they get their statues now? I guess that has internal logic from your point of view.

    George Washington was a traitorous general, but I guess it's only treason if you lose. For example, the traitorous Jews who rebelled against Rome in 69 A.D. I hope nobody is celebrating their treachery.

    Replies: @kaganovitch

    , @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Jack D


    He really was murdered for racist reasons and it’s not wrong to have a monument to him.
     
    No, he was murdered for his threatening actions and alleged post hoc defiance. Whether or not “racist reasons” are wrong is a separate argument.

    Yes, his character and what he did was questionable but he did not deserve death.
     
    He certainly deserved death in a ‘Darwin awards’ sense: play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Emmett Till deserves zero sympathy. You may whine, ‘he was just a kid’, but do you think he would be any wiser at his dad’s age as when his father was dispatched? LOL
    , @James N. Kennett
    @Jack D


    Goodness knows that for 100 years there were monuments throughout the South for traitorous generals (some still stand) who did not deserve them.
     
    Southerners put up those statues in the early 20th Century, to remind people who was boss. The proposed statue of Emmett Till serves the same purpose.

    General Lee opposed statues because he believed they got in the way of reconciliation. He was correct.

    Replies: @res, @AceDeuce

  61. @Art Deco
    He was crime victim. Very unfortunate for him and his family, but there's nothing to honor in that. Let his friends and relations put flowers on his grave. It doesn't involve the rest of us.

    Replies: @Jack D

    This was not some random crime – a robbery gone wrong, a drunken bar brawl. The crime was only possible in the context of the Jim Crow system. His crime fundamentally was that he did not “know his place”. The killing was not just personal to Till and his family but was part and parcel of a system designed to keep blacks in their place at the bottom of a racial hierarchy. His killers were not punished for their crime because of this hierarchy. So to pretend that this had nothing to do with anyone or anything else is just false.

    • Replies: @Forbes
    @Jack D

    Are most crimes random? Out of the blue? Or by those lacking mental competency to comprehend consequences and culpability?

    Or is the crime, in fact, the result of a choice of action to violate another for their own advantage?

    , @Art Deco
    @Jack D

    You're offering an explanation of some of the perpetrators' motives, and the jury's. That is irrelevant. He was an ordinary youth and, as ordinary youths are, of interest to his friends and relations.
    ==
    My grandfather had a cousin in the Army Air Corps who died in a plane crash during the war. (He was the pilot and sole occupant). He left a wife and daughter. Being in uniform, being married, and fathering a daughter made his life of more significance than Emmett Till's (which is different than saying it was of greater value). His monument is a gravestone in a cemetery in the small town where he grew up.

    Replies: @Pirate King of Arkansas

    , @Colin Wright
    @Jack D


    'This was not some random crime – a robbery gone wrong, a drunken bar brawl. The crime was only possible in the context of the Jim Crow system. His crime fundamentally was that he did not “know his place”. The killing was not just personal to Till and his family but was part and parcel of a system designed to keep blacks in their place at the bottom of a racial hierarchy. His killers were not punished for their crime because of this hierarchy. So to pretend that this had nothing to do with anyone or anything else is just false.'
     
    One wonders how you would handle living and working in a majority black area. How, for example, would you go about making sure your young wife could mind the store by herself?

    Emmitt Till's murder was definitely a beating that went sideways. But I can see how it happened. Read the Look Magazine article.

    Replies: @Corvinus, @nonentity

    , @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Jack D


    His crime fundamentally was that he did not “know his place”.
     
    Notably, as fundamentally expressed by being a demonstrable physical threat (and allegedly unrepentant under subsequent duress) to members of the community. Looks like his killers nipped that ongoing individual threat in the bud. You seem sad about that.

    Replies: @Jack D

    , @Anonymous Jew
    @Jack D


    The crime was only possible in the context of the Jim Crow system. His crime fundamentally was that he did not “know his place”.
     
    What’s the total excess Black-on-White murders caused by integration? I would like to see a comparison of Black murderers % of White victims both before and after Jim Crow. Maybe Jim Crow wasn’t entirely good; but maybe it wasn’t entirely bad either.

    Southern Whites knew Blacks more intimately than, say, Northern Jews. Ideally, you want to treat people as individuals. But when the Bell Curves are too far apart that isn’t always pragmatic.

    Replies: @Jack D, @Corvinus

    , @The Anti-Gnostic
    @Jack D

    Getting a beat-down or killing for not knowing your place wasn't invented by early 20th century Southerners. You can be as blue-blooded and wealthy as a Rockefeller but you are still going to end up dead if you show your arrogant ass around the wrong part of town.

    There is a striking modern example: wealthy, influential, WASPy Bob Lee had his entrails handed to him when he ended up on the wrong side of California's Kardashian-American honor culture. And I bet you Nima Momeni, defender of his family's honor, gets sprung by a jury of his peers or gets a generous plea bargain.

    Replies: @Pixo, @Ed Case, @Jack D, @Corvinus

  62. @Arclight
    It's interesting how doing something symbolic for blacks has been a sure-fire way to rally the base for Democrats for decades. The left's relationship with this demographic can truly be described as religious in nature.

    Replies: @Jack D

    This is part and parcel of politics in an ethnically or racially divided country. Big city politics in America has operated this way since the 19th century. Biden owes his office to the blacks of the South and of course he wants to repay them politically. He makes no secret of this. Biden being Biden he sometimes says the quiet part out loud.

    Republicans only WISH that they had a solid base of 90+% R voters that they could pander to. As pandering goes, this is gonna be cheap.

    • Replies: @bomag
    @Jack D

    Yeah, but one expects leadership not to be in-your-face and rude about the pandering.

    Not sure how one spins Till as a sympathetic figure. As with George Floyd, can come across as a criticism of Black life where the lauded figures are plenty undesirable.

    , @Arclight
    @Jack D

    True - politically, blacks are incredibly cheap dates. I always laugh when people insist we ought to listen to them more on national issues, as though following the lead of the most dog-loyal partisans in the nation is a bright idea.

    , @Mr. Anon
    @Jack D


    Republicans only WISH that they had a solid base of 90+% R voters that they could pander to. As pandering goes, this is gonna be cheap.
     
    A monument for Mary Phagan would be cheap too.

    Care to ante up with your tax dollars, Councilor?
  63. @The Germ Theory of Disease
    Sorry to go all off the ranch OT but i just think everybody could use a bit of cheering up from the old days......


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIcb7MnCkLs


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3ov9USxVxY

    Remember back when Madonna was fun, and not a pain in the ass?


    Part of the reason I'm putting this here is, even though I share a more bizarre spiritual kinship with La PJ, physically I grew up in the same place and time as Madonna, and i remember just how horrible everything was; so she found a way to do something kooky and pleasant and happy with all of that non-stop monstrosity, and so because she figured that out, and also made a freaking fortune out of doing it, what can I say? except, I dips me lid.

    Sorry everything else later got a bit too ka-razy, but ya gotta admit, at least the 80s were fun. And I can certainly tell you that your 1980s were a LOT more fun than my 1980s.

    Replies: @Pat Hannagan, @Legba, @Joe Stalin, @Richard B, @RadicalCenter

    Remember back when Madonna was fun, and not a pain in the ass?

    Not at all. I remember her as the talentless slut that she still is.

    • Agree: Jim Don Bob
    • Thanks: RadicalCenter
    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @Legba

    Desperately Seeking Susan was pretty entertaining.

    , @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Legba

    "I remember her [Madonna] as the talentless slut that she still is."


    You have your terms confused.

    If you are chasing after everybody else, then you are a slut.

    But if everybody else is chasing after you, then you are a rock star.

    Since you seem to have never been either one of these, you are thus excused from the rest of this discussion.

    Replies: @Legba, @vinnyvette

  64. @Voltarde
    National monument? It'll become a national religious shrine. Compulsory worship, statements of faith, ex-communication and condemnation of non-believers, etc.

    Get ready for the UniParty to re-brand "Reparations" as "Repentarations".

    Replies: @Forbes

    They can put Till next to the George Floyd monument…

  65. @Dan Smith
    Enough about lynching already. As everyone ought to know, lynching involves removal of an accused criminal from proper authorities by civilians. Till wasn't accused of breaking any laws and he wasn't in custody. Yeah, he was murdered. So were a lot of blacks who aren't getting any recognition. The three civil rights workers murdered in Mississippi in 1964 (Cheney, Goodman, and Schwerner) were killed with the collusion of law enforcement. That was a lynching.

    Replies: @Mike Tre, @Observator, @Achmed E. Newman, @AceDeuce, @NotAnonymousHere, @G. Poulin

    #15 :

    As everyone ought to know, lynching involves removal of an accused criminal from proper authorities by civilians.

    No one knows that because it’s not true. You suck.

    • Replies: @Dan Smith
    @NotAnonymousHere

    Thanks for showing off your ignorance. Schoolyard taunts have zero effect.

    , @Art Deco
    @NotAnonymousHere

    It's precisely true.

  66. @Jack D
    @Art Deco

    This was not some random crime - a robbery gone wrong, a drunken bar brawl. The crime was only possible in the context of the Jim Crow system. His crime fundamentally was that he did not "know his place". The killing was not just personal to Till and his family but was part and parcel of a system designed to keep blacks in their place at the bottom of a racial hierarchy. His killers were not punished for their crime because of this hierarchy. So to pretend that this had nothing to do with anyone or anything else is just false.

    Replies: @Forbes, @Art Deco, @Colin Wright, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Anonymous Jew, @The Anti-Gnostic

    Are most crimes random? Out of the blue? Or by those lacking mental competency to comprehend consequences and culpability?

    Or is the crime, in fact, the result of a choice of action to violate another for their own advantage?

  67. @Jack D
    @AnotherDad

    Not a chance. This is a one way ratchet - Dems put stuff like this in place and then GOP maintains it. The chances of a rollback are zero. Are you some kind of racist or sumthin?

    And no your national separation is not happening. Stop fantasizing. Whiteland has as much chance of materializing as Wakanda.

    Goodness knows that for 100 years there were monuments throughout the South for traitorous generals (some still stand) who did not deserve them. Those generals got a lot of Americans killed for an unjust cause (the right to own other human beings). A Martian would say that it's nuts that we put up statues of those guys. Who won the Civil War? Do they have statues of Nazis in Germany?

    Till did not live long enough to kill anyone. He really was murdered for racist reasons and it's not wrong to have a monument to him. Yes, his character and what he did was questionable but he did not deserve death.

    Replies: @bomag, @Reg Cæsar, @res, @Wilkey, @Art Deco, @Reg Cæsar, @AceDeuce, @pyrrhus, @Alden, @AnotherDad, @AnotherDad, @Hypnotoad666, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @James N. Kennett

    He really was murdered for racist reasons and it’s not wrong to have a monument to him.

    Then there is a line of people waiting for a monument; plenty of them White.

    • Agree: mark green
    • Thanks: Legba
  68. @Jack D
    @Arclight

    This is part and parcel of politics in an ethnically or racially divided country. Big city politics in America has operated this way since the 19th century. Biden owes his office to the blacks of the South and of course he wants to repay them politically. He makes no secret of this. Biden being Biden he sometimes says the quiet part out loud.


    Republicans only WISH that they had a solid base of 90+% R voters that they could pander to. As pandering goes, this is gonna be cheap.

    Replies: @bomag, @Arclight, @Mr. Anon

    Yeah, but one expects leadership not to be in-your-face and rude about the pandering.

    Not sure how one spins Till as a sympathetic figure. As with George Floyd, can come across as a criticism of Black life where the lauded figures are plenty undesirable.

  69. For the sake of equity, it would be apropo to have a Museum of Interacial Crime in Washington, DC for the rest of us to visit.

    A true celebration of Diversity!

  70. @Jack D
    @AnotherDad

    Not a chance. This is a one way ratchet - Dems put stuff like this in place and then GOP maintains it. The chances of a rollback are zero. Are you some kind of racist or sumthin?

    And no your national separation is not happening. Stop fantasizing. Whiteland has as much chance of materializing as Wakanda.

    Goodness knows that for 100 years there were monuments throughout the South for traitorous generals (some still stand) who did not deserve them. Those generals got a lot of Americans killed for an unjust cause (the right to own other human beings). A Martian would say that it's nuts that we put up statues of those guys. Who won the Civil War? Do they have statues of Nazis in Germany?

    Till did not live long enough to kill anyone. He really was murdered for racist reasons and it's not wrong to have a monument to him. Yes, his character and what he did was questionable but he did not deserve death.

    Replies: @bomag, @Reg Cæsar, @res, @Wilkey, @Art Deco, @Reg Cæsar, @AceDeuce, @pyrrhus, @Alden, @AnotherDad, @AnotherDad, @Hypnotoad666, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @James N. Kennett

    Who won the Civil War?

    A walking tour of the north half of your city will quickly answer that question!

    Goodness knows that for 100 years there were monuments throughout the South for traitorous generals…

    Such as Benjamin Lincoln? Careful with that broad brush…

  71. Sorry to go off topic, but a few posts back (“The Victim Sweepstakes”), the comment thread touched on emotional support animals. Do you think the airlines would let her travel for free if she sat on my lap?
    https://nypost.com/2023/07/22/influencer-works-as-emotional-support-stripper-in-ukraine/

  72. Who says there’s never any good news?

    Lockheed Martin believes global instability is driving demand and sees an increase in annual profits. Washington’s proxy war in Ukraine has caused an increase in arms spending among NATO members, boosting weapons makers’ stock prices.

    On Tuesday, Lockheed raised its annual profit and sales outlook on strong demand for military equipment.

    Who’da Thunk it?

    • Thanks: Mark G.
    • Replies: @Joe Stalin
    @Bill Jones


    What's on their mind?
     
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXZw_YGzxCc
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5eUh3_eo9E
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BHnijL9xYc
  73. @Mike Tre
    @Dan Smith

    "The three civil rights workers"

    If we're going to speak in correct terms, then let's call these three what they really were: Invasive communist seditious provocateurs.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    If we’re going to speak in correct terms, then let’s call these three what they really were: Invasive communist seditious provocateurs.

    Like Rachel Corrie?

    • Troll: Corvinus
    • Replies: @Pixo
    @Reg Cæsar

    Beep beep! Beep beep!

    https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/b/construction-worker-bulldozer-vector-cartoon-driver-kids-small-funny-cute-car-man-children-illustration-machinery-211571963.jpg

    Replies: @Corvinus

  74. res says:
    @Jack D
    @AnotherDad

    Not a chance. This is a one way ratchet - Dems put stuff like this in place and then GOP maintains it. The chances of a rollback are zero. Are you some kind of racist or sumthin?

    And no your national separation is not happening. Stop fantasizing. Whiteland has as much chance of materializing as Wakanda.

    Goodness knows that for 100 years there were monuments throughout the South for traitorous generals (some still stand) who did not deserve them. Those generals got a lot of Americans killed for an unjust cause (the right to own other human beings). A Martian would say that it's nuts that we put up statues of those guys. Who won the Civil War? Do they have statues of Nazis in Germany?

    Till did not live long enough to kill anyone. He really was murdered for racist reasons and it's not wrong to have a monument to him. Yes, his character and what he did was questionable but he did not deserve death.

    Replies: @bomag, @Reg Cæsar, @res, @Wilkey, @Art Deco, @Reg Cæsar, @AceDeuce, @pyrrhus, @Alden, @AnotherDad, @AnotherDad, @Hypnotoad666, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @James N. Kennett

    He really was murdered for racist reasons and it’s not wrong to have a monument to him.

    If that is the standard there will be many monuments. In history how many people have been murdered because they were part of an outgroup and behaving badly? As you note the scandalous part is more that his killers got off scot-free.

    How do you feel about the (double?) standard that monuments to Robert E Lee (etc.) are beyond the pale? (rereading your comment I guess you answered that in the earlier part, interesting how many of those traitors served the US honorably in the Mexican War and years leading up to the Civil War)

    • Replies: @Wilkey
    @res


    He really was murdered for racist reasons and it’s not wrong to have a monument to him.
     
    He was murdered for being a horny teen asshole who groped another man’s wife. Sure, the guys who murdered him were assholes, too, as were the jurors who let them off.

    In a very large percentage of crimes both the victims and the perps are complete assholes. That doesn’t justify erecting monuments to the victims.

    But sure, I’ll go with a monument for Emmett Till. Let’s start erecting monuments to all of the white people murdered by black thugs, also. Make sure you point out the race of the murderers on the monuments, because you know it will be mentioned on Till’s.

    In fact, let’s erect a monument to every black murder victim. Make sure to mention the race of the murderers on those monuments, too.
    , @Dmon
    @res

    Only the winners get to have statues. It's why you can have a statue of David Yulee but not Robert E. Lee, or Anne Frank (in Idaho!) but not Mary Phagan.

    , @Mike Tre
    @res

    "He really was murdered for racist reasons and it’s not wrong to have a monument to him. "

    So was Mary Phagan, but hey hey, we don't go there here.

    And I've read one of Till's killers was in fact a negro.

    Replies: @res

  75. @kaganovitch
    @Wilkey


    Which Congress will immediately designate be celebrated on Monday, as they do, so that federal employees can have yet another three day weekend.
     
    Maybe that's not such a bad thing. The more they're off perhaps the better. As the Talmud has it, "Sleep for the wicked is a benefit to them and a benefit to the World."

    Replies: @Wilkey

    Sounds great in theory, but increasing the number of paid federal holidays doesn’t seem to be decreasing the damage being done.

    We’ve added two new paid federal holidays in my lifetime – both celebrating America’s most thoughtful and productive demographic – yet this country is now nearly broke.

    • Replies: @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY)
    @Wilkey

    Wilkey writes, "We’ve added two new paid federal holidays in my lifetime – both celebrating America’s most thoughtful and productive demographic".

    Please pardon my ignorance, but what are these two holidays, and what is this demographic?

    Replies: @Wilkey

  76. @Jack D
    @Arclight

    This is part and parcel of politics in an ethnically or racially divided country. Big city politics in America has operated this way since the 19th century. Biden owes his office to the blacks of the South and of course he wants to repay them politically. He makes no secret of this. Biden being Biden he sometimes says the quiet part out loud.


    Republicans only WISH that they had a solid base of 90+% R voters that they could pander to. As pandering goes, this is gonna be cheap.

    Replies: @bomag, @Arclight, @Mr. Anon

    True – politically, blacks are incredibly cheap dates. I always laugh when people insist we ought to listen to them more on national issues, as though following the lead of the most dog-loyal partisans in the nation is a bright idea.

  77. @res
    @Jack D


    He really was murdered for racist reasons and it’s not wrong to have a monument to him.
     
    If that is the standard there will be many monuments. In history how many people have been murdered because they were part of an outgroup and behaving badly? As you note the scandalous part is more that his killers got off scot-free.

    How do you feel about the (double?) standard that monuments to Robert E Lee (etc.) are beyond the pale? (rereading your comment I guess you answered that in the earlier part, interesting how many of those traitors served the US honorably in the Mexican War and years leading up to the Civil War)

    Replies: @Wilkey, @Dmon, @Mike Tre

    He really was murdered for racist reasons and it’s not wrong to have a monument to him.

    He was murdered for being a horny teen asshole who groped another man’s wife. Sure, the guys who murdered him were assholes, too, as were the jurors who let them off.

    In a very large percentage of crimes both the victims and the perps are complete assholes. That doesn’t justify erecting monuments to the victims.

    But sure, I’ll go with a monument for Emmett Till. Let’s start erecting monuments to all of the white people murdered by black thugs, also. Make sure you point out the race of the murderers on the monuments, because you know it will be mentioned on Till’s.

    In fact, let’s erect a monument to every black murder victim. Make sure to mention the race of the murderers on those monuments, too.

  78. @Jack D
    @AnotherDad

    Not a chance. This is a one way ratchet - Dems put stuff like this in place and then GOP maintains it. The chances of a rollback are zero. Are you some kind of racist or sumthin?

    And no your national separation is not happening. Stop fantasizing. Whiteland has as much chance of materializing as Wakanda.

    Goodness knows that for 100 years there were monuments throughout the South for traitorous generals (some still stand) who did not deserve them. Those generals got a lot of Americans killed for an unjust cause (the right to own other human beings). A Martian would say that it's nuts that we put up statues of those guys. Who won the Civil War? Do they have statues of Nazis in Germany?

    Till did not live long enough to kill anyone. He really was murdered for racist reasons and it's not wrong to have a monument to him. Yes, his character and what he did was questionable but he did not deserve death.

    Replies: @bomag, @Reg Cæsar, @res, @Wilkey, @Art Deco, @Reg Cæsar, @AceDeuce, @pyrrhus, @Alden, @AnotherDad, @AnotherDad, @Hypnotoad666, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @James N. Kennett

    Goodness knows that for 100 years there were monuments throughout the South for traitorous generals (some still stand) who did not deserve them.

    Those generals weren’t traitorous. They were generals who were from a part of the country that wanted to leave the United States but was kept in at gunpoint, and at great loss of life.

    I’m no fan of the “Lost Cause,” and think the war was a horrible waste in defense of a really bad system. But calling Confederate generals traitors is just obnoxiously stupid.

    The war ended 158 years ago. Let people have their heroes and make peace with the past and move on.

    • Replies: @pyrrhus
    @Wilkey

    The War was fought over the Morrill Tariff, not slavery....Lincoln was a tool of the Northern industrialists who wanted the South to be a captive market, and also to tax and control its cotton exports to England...

  79. You have to admit that a public monument to sexual harassment is pretty funny, when you stop to think about it. I’m sure France and Italy are studded with them, but this is Feminist America.

    Where are the harridans when you need them?

  80. @Jack D
    @AnotherDad

    Not a chance. This is a one way ratchet - Dems put stuff like this in place and then GOP maintains it. The chances of a rollback are zero. Are you some kind of racist or sumthin?

    And no your national separation is not happening. Stop fantasizing. Whiteland has as much chance of materializing as Wakanda.

    Goodness knows that for 100 years there were monuments throughout the South for traitorous generals (some still stand) who did not deserve them. Those generals got a lot of Americans killed for an unjust cause (the right to own other human beings). A Martian would say that it's nuts that we put up statues of those guys. Who won the Civil War? Do they have statues of Nazis in Germany?

    Till did not live long enough to kill anyone. He really was murdered for racist reasons and it's not wrong to have a monument to him. Yes, his character and what he did was questionable but he did not deserve death.

    Replies: @bomag, @Reg Cæsar, @res, @Wilkey, @Art Deco, @Reg Cæsar, @AceDeuce, @pyrrhus, @Alden, @AnotherDad, @AnotherDad, @Hypnotoad666, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @James N. Kennett

    who did not deserve them.
    ==
    You don’t understand what ordinary people value.

    • Agree: RadicalCenter
    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Art Deco

    All over the former E. Bloc there were thousands of statues of Lenin (and for a while, Stalin). Were they there because the locals valued them? To the extent that Civil War generals were popular in the South, part of that was a massive, organized propaganda campaign that was quite successful in brainwashing people. In some places in the E. Bloc, Lenin and Stalin also enjoyed a lot of popularity among ordinary people. For that matter, the ordinary people of German admired Hitler for a while.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Wilkey, @rebel yell, @Hypnotoad666, @Art Deco, @mc23

  81. @AnotherDad
    This "Biden" administration is great!

    No seriously. The minoritarians when doing politics have usually lathered up their toxic ideology with all sorts "American" this or "working people" that. Now we have flat out 200 proof minoritarian administration--well except for senile old man on the bottle's label--it's just so much more openly "F U whitey!"

    Seriously, can we just separate already? I am so ready to get these blood sucking parasites off of my--and America's--body.

    Replies: @Ennui

    What were the Puritans if not Minoritarians? The English and Dutch colonies were populated by minoritarian snowflakes. Victimization was pioneered by Irish Catholics and assorted Protestant groups in this country.

    If you want people with a healthy sense of collective, corporate identity, you’d need to settle in the French or Spanish colonies.

    • Replies: @Prester John
    @Ennui

    Read a piece a few weeks ago somewhere, I don't remember where, in which the author traced modern progressivism and its inevitable byproduct, the woke phenomenon, back to the Calvinism embraced by our friends who were on board the Mayflower and Speedwell. I have always thought that over the centuries, the old Genevan Reformer has had a greater influence upon American society (in matters religious or otherwise) than I think he gets credit for.

  82. Where are the harridans when you need them?

    They know their place on the pole…

  83. @Jack D
    @Art Deco

    This was not some random crime - a robbery gone wrong, a drunken bar brawl. The crime was only possible in the context of the Jim Crow system. His crime fundamentally was that he did not "know his place". The killing was not just personal to Till and his family but was part and parcel of a system designed to keep blacks in their place at the bottom of a racial hierarchy. His killers were not punished for their crime because of this hierarchy. So to pretend that this had nothing to do with anyone or anything else is just false.

    Replies: @Forbes, @Art Deco, @Colin Wright, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Anonymous Jew, @The Anti-Gnostic

    You’re offering an explanation of some of the perpetrators’ motives, and the jury’s. That is irrelevant. He was an ordinary youth and, as ordinary youths are, of interest to his friends and relations.
    ==
    My grandfather had a cousin in the Army Air Corps who died in a plane crash during the war. (He was the pilot and sole occupant). He left a wife and daughter. Being in uniform, being married, and fathering a daughter made his life of more significance than Emmett Till’s (which is different than saying it was of greater value). His monument is a gravestone in a cemetery in the small town where he grew up.

    • Replies: @Pirate King of Arkansas
    @Art Deco

    Well said, Good Sir.

    I appreciated your comment regarding your WWII Veteran ancestor.

    Spot on. Indicative & symbolic of the Clown World the US has become. Thank you for your comment.

  84. If all goes right — ritual, alchemical — fully-reanimated Emmett will shake hands with partially-reanimated Biden at the monument unveiling.

  85. @AnotherDad
    Sounds like this monument is only for Emmett Till. That seems disrespectful to all the other rapists in training who were violently denied the opportunity to perfect their craft.

    Replies: @Ralph L, @Jim Don Bob, @Kylie, @Barnard

    “Sounds like this monument is only for Emmett Till. That seems disrespectful to all the other rapists in training who were violently denied the opportunity to perfect their craft.”

    What about a monument to those who committed some truly monumental crimes?

    Letalvis D. Cobbins
    Lemaricus D. Davidson
    George Thomas
    Eric Boyd
    Vanessa Coleman

  86. @Wilkey
    @kaganovitch

    Sounds great in theory, but increasing the number of paid federal holidays doesn’t seem to be decreasing the damage being done.

    We’ve added two new paid federal holidays in my lifetime - both celebrating America’s most thoughtful and productive demographic - yet this country is now nearly broke.

    Replies: @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY)

    Wilkey writes, “We’ve added two new paid federal holidays in my lifetime – both celebrating America’s most thoughtful and productive demographic”.

    Please pardon my ignorance, but what are these two holidays, and what is this demographic?

    • Replies: @Wilkey
    @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY)

    Martin Luther King Day (1983) and Juneteenth (2021).

    Incidentally, Memorial Day and Columbus Day only became federal holidays in 1968. That's still nearly a decade before I was born, but I never would have guessed they were that recent.

    Replies: @AnotherDad, @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY), @Ralph L, @RadicalCenter

  87. @The Germ Theory of Disease
    Sorry to go all off the ranch OT but i just think everybody could use a bit of cheering up from the old days......


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIcb7MnCkLs


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3ov9USxVxY

    Remember back when Madonna was fun, and not a pain in the ass?


    Part of the reason I'm putting this here is, even though I share a more bizarre spiritual kinship with La PJ, physically I grew up in the same place and time as Madonna, and i remember just how horrible everything was; so she found a way to do something kooky and pleasant and happy with all of that non-stop monstrosity, and so because she figured that out, and also made a freaking fortune out of doing it, what can I say? except, I dips me lid.

    Sorry everything else later got a bit too ka-razy, but ya gotta admit, at least the 80s were fun. And I can certainly tell you that your 1980s were a LOT more fun than my 1980s.

    Replies: @Pat Hannagan, @Legba, @Joe Stalin, @Richard B, @RadicalCenter

    Miniature “GS.”

  88. @Jack D
    @AnotherDad

    Not a chance. This is a one way ratchet - Dems put stuff like this in place and then GOP maintains it. The chances of a rollback are zero. Are you some kind of racist or sumthin?

    And no your national separation is not happening. Stop fantasizing. Whiteland has as much chance of materializing as Wakanda.

    Goodness knows that for 100 years there were monuments throughout the South for traitorous generals (some still stand) who did not deserve them. Those generals got a lot of Americans killed for an unjust cause (the right to own other human beings). A Martian would say that it's nuts that we put up statues of those guys. Who won the Civil War? Do they have statues of Nazis in Germany?

    Till did not live long enough to kill anyone. He really was murdered for racist reasons and it's not wrong to have a monument to him. Yes, his character and what he did was questionable but he did not deserve death.

    Replies: @bomag, @Reg Cæsar, @res, @Wilkey, @Art Deco, @Reg Cæsar, @AceDeuce, @pyrrhus, @Alden, @AnotherDad, @AnotherDad, @Hypnotoad666, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @James N. Kennett

    He really was murdered for racist reasons…

    We don’t know that, and we can’t. Had this been the local sheriff’s son, they would have acted differently. But what if a mouthy white Chicago kid had done the same? Would he have been killed as well? Maybe, maybe not. (Depends on their view of “Yankees”.) We don’t know.

    But we can be sure that in such a case, the jury would have “deliberated” a bit longer. We forget (or aren’t told) that the real scandal to mid-1950s Americans wasn’t the crime itself, but the offhand exoneration.

    Similar to how the draft-card burners a decade later weren’t protesting the draft itself, but the war. (They weren’t being cowards, they were being politicians.) What looks like a minor detail can alter one’s view of the entire situation.

    • Replies: @CBart
    @Reg Cæsar

    If it were true that they were protesting the war and not the draft then why did all the protests stop after the draft was stopped while the war continued?

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    , @Jack D
    @Reg Cæsar

    As I said before, Till stands not just for his own death at the hands of white trash, but for the whole system that existed to deprive blacks of the promises of legal equality made in the 14th Amendment and which permeated Southern society and government.

    Personally I doubt that if Till had been a white kid from Chicago that he would have been killed. A white teenager did not threaten the social order in the way that Till did. Carolyn Bryant was able to stay alone in an isolated store in an all black community because of the regime of fear created by Mississippi whites. Killing a white teen would not have served to maintain the regime of fear.

    Even under the unwritten code of the South, Till deserved no more than a thorough beating. Although the code of the South did not permit his killers to be convicted, neither were they hailed as local heroes - in fact they were shunned by the locals and had to move away because they had also broken the local social order (and indeed helped immeasurably to bring about the end of that order). The fact that Till was black and seen as less than human (also that he continued to mouth off to them) is what caused his killers to escalate from a mere beating to murder. In fact, THEY are the ones who should be getting monuments for that reason. Till would have probably end up dead or in prison in Chicago anyway but for their intervention. But nobody puts up statues of Pontius Pilate either.

    For whatever reason, just or unjust, sometimes random dufuses become symbolic heroes. Blacks being blacks, they have more random dufuses than most - Rodney King, George Floyd, etc. Rosa Parks was not a random dufus and neither was Homer Plessy because they were both carefully chosen in advance to be test defendants.

    Replies: @Alden

    , @Anonymous
    @Reg Cæsar


    Similar to how the draft-card burners a decade later weren’t protesting the draft itself, but the war. (They weren’t being cowards, they were being politicians.)
     
    Except that, as was noted at the time, "anti-war" protests as a mass crowd phenomenon cratered the moment Nixon all but rendered the draft toothless two years before it was actually abolished outright. (The '71 and '72 call ups got less than 100K and 50K inductees respectively, the '73 one only 646.)

    They were anti-draft, not anti-war--personal not principled.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

  89. Anon[159] • Disclaimer says:

    This is just Bribe ’em thinking it’s a simple way of holding onto the black vote. The economy’s been going downhill, and Bribe ’em thinks blacks will easily fall in line if he gives them a Till monument.

    Well guess what? A long time ago, Democrats figured out that to blacks, pride is more important than money. Because most blacks are on welfare, food stamps, and Section 8, their basic financial needs are covered. They don’t have to worry about starving or not having shelter. They don’t even have to work. Therefore, what rouses blacks is their pride. A display like a Till monument, (along with a Democrat promise to keep those freebies coming) will always keep blacks voting Democratic.

    The only think that worries Democrats is if blacks become too apathetic to vote. Therefore, Democrats feel they need to keep reminding blacks of past wrongs to get them to the polls, much the way Democrats keep reminding Jews of the Holocaust to keep them going to the polls. Democrats are terrified that the minute voting blocs stop being reminded of ancient wrongs, they’ll become apathetic about politics and stop voting Democrat.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @Anon

    Because most blacks are on welfare, food stamps, and Section 8, their basic financial needs are covered.
    ==
    They're not. About 2% are collecting TANF, about 25% are enrolled in SNAP, and about 10% are receiving some sort of subsidized housing.

  90. @Jack D
    @AnotherDad

    Not a chance. This is a one way ratchet - Dems put stuff like this in place and then GOP maintains it. The chances of a rollback are zero. Are you some kind of racist or sumthin?

    And no your national separation is not happening. Stop fantasizing. Whiteland has as much chance of materializing as Wakanda.

    Goodness knows that for 100 years there were monuments throughout the South for traitorous generals (some still stand) who did not deserve them. Those generals got a lot of Americans killed for an unjust cause (the right to own other human beings). A Martian would say that it's nuts that we put up statues of those guys. Who won the Civil War? Do they have statues of Nazis in Germany?

    Till did not live long enough to kill anyone. He really was murdered for racist reasons and it's not wrong to have a monument to him. Yes, his character and what he did was questionable but he did not deserve death.

    Replies: @bomag, @Reg Cæsar, @res, @Wilkey, @Art Deco, @Reg Cæsar, @AceDeuce, @pyrrhus, @Alden, @AnotherDad, @AnotherDad, @Hypnotoad666, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @James N. Kennett

    Till did not live long enough to kill anyone. He really was murdered for racist reasons and it’s not wrong to have a monument to him. Yes, his character and what he did was questionable but he did not deserve death.

    Tell you what, Cuck Wuck-if the same thing happened-the EXACT same thing happened-except that a White teen sexually assaulted a married negro female, and her negro husband took care of business the same way, I bet you’d be just fine with it.

    “Little punk found out! You don’t mess with A BLACK MAN’S woman!!!” you’d say, as your Vienna sausage got tumescent in your pleated Dockers.

  91. Can a national monument dedicated to George Floyd be far behind?

  92. @Achmed E. Newman
    Money, Mississippi is just too far off (to the west) of the Natchez Trace Parkway* to make a good side trip. Perhaps we'll check it out on the way to the world's biggest ball of yarn.

    .

    * A really nice drive, but fill up your car in Tupelo or Jackson, depending. Going south, I came into Jackson on fumes.

    Replies: @Calvin Hobbes, @pyrrhus, @AnotherDad

    And you don’t want to be in Jackson, MS for any reason….

  93. @Jack D
    @AnotherDad

    Not a chance. This is a one way ratchet - Dems put stuff like this in place and then GOP maintains it. The chances of a rollback are zero. Are you some kind of racist or sumthin?

    And no your national separation is not happening. Stop fantasizing. Whiteland has as much chance of materializing as Wakanda.

    Goodness knows that for 100 years there were monuments throughout the South for traitorous generals (some still stand) who did not deserve them. Those generals got a lot of Americans killed for an unjust cause (the right to own other human beings). A Martian would say that it's nuts that we put up statues of those guys. Who won the Civil War? Do they have statues of Nazis in Germany?

    Till did not live long enough to kill anyone. He really was murdered for racist reasons and it's not wrong to have a monument to him. Yes, his character and what he did was questionable but he did not deserve death.

    Replies: @bomag, @Reg Cæsar, @res, @Wilkey, @Art Deco, @Reg Cæsar, @AceDeuce, @pyrrhus, @Alden, @AnotherDad, @AnotherDad, @Hypnotoad666, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @James N. Kennett

    Well, since every sovereign State had the right to secede, which was conceded at the time of ratification and afterward, Generals defending that right against a Lincoln dictatorship were anythibg except treasonous…

  94. @Jack D
    @Arclight

    This is part and parcel of politics in an ethnically or racially divided country. Big city politics in America has operated this way since the 19th century. Biden owes his office to the blacks of the South and of course he wants to repay them politically. He makes no secret of this. Biden being Biden he sometimes says the quiet part out loud.


    Republicans only WISH that they had a solid base of 90+% R voters that they could pander to. As pandering goes, this is gonna be cheap.

    Replies: @bomag, @Arclight, @Mr. Anon

    Republicans only WISH that they had a solid base of 90+% R voters that they could pander to. As pandering goes, this is gonna be cheap.

    A monument for Mary Phagan would be cheap too.

    Care to ante up with your tax dollars, Councilor?

  95. @Wilkey
    @Jack D


    Goodness knows that for 100 years there were monuments throughout the South for traitorous generals (some still stand) who did not deserve them.
     
    Those generals weren’t traitorous. They were generals who were from a part of the country that wanted to leave the United States but was kept in at gunpoint, and at great loss of life.

    I’m no fan of the “Lost Cause,” and think the war was a horrible waste in defense of a really bad system. But calling Confederate generals traitors is just obnoxiously stupid.

    The war ended 158 years ago. Let people have their heroes and make peace with the past and move on.

    Replies: @pyrrhus

    The War was fought over the Morrill Tariff, not slavery….Lincoln was a tool of the Northern industrialists who wanted the South to be a captive market, and also to tax and control its cotton exports to England…

  96. OT:

    ‘This Is a Really Big Deal’: How College Towns Are Decimating the GOP Growing population in America’s highly educated enclaves has led to huge gains for the Democratic Party. And Republicans are scrambling for answers.

    https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/07/21/gop-college-towns-00106974

    Defund the Professoriate!

    Red States need to start defunding public universities. Downsize them: eliminate departments and force them to fire their armies of administrators.

  97. @Jack D
    @Art Deco

    This was not some random crime - a robbery gone wrong, a drunken bar brawl. The crime was only possible in the context of the Jim Crow system. His crime fundamentally was that he did not "know his place". The killing was not just personal to Till and his family but was part and parcel of a system designed to keep blacks in their place at the bottom of a racial hierarchy. His killers were not punished for their crime because of this hierarchy. So to pretend that this had nothing to do with anyone or anything else is just false.

    Replies: @Forbes, @Art Deco, @Colin Wright, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Anonymous Jew, @The Anti-Gnostic

    ‘This was not some random crime – a robbery gone wrong, a drunken bar brawl. The crime was only possible in the context of the Jim Crow system. His crime fundamentally was that he did not “know his place”. The killing was not just personal to Till and his family but was part and parcel of a system designed to keep blacks in their place at the bottom of a racial hierarchy. His killers were not punished for their crime because of this hierarchy. So to pretend that this had nothing to do with anyone or anything else is just false.’

    One wonders how you would handle living and working in a majority black area. How, for example, would you go about making sure your young wife could mind the store by herself?

    Emmitt Till’s murder was definitely a beating that went sideways. But I can see how it happened. Read the Look Magazine article.

    • Thanks: Achmed E. Newman
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    @Colin Wright

    “Emmitt Till’s murder was definitely a beating that went sideways”

    JFC, the beating never should have taken place at all!

    , @nonentity
    @Colin Wright

    Till committed a sexual assault effectively opening the way for further mayhem against the women who ran the isolated store. The only choice for the owners was to cut and run or to deal a blow that would be remembered. The planned beating certainly went sideways as anything like that could have, but to have done nothing would have been to sentence the women to much worse. What would you have done?

  98. @Reg Cæsar
    @Jack D


    He really was murdered for racist reasons...
     
    We don't know that, and we can't. Had this been the local sheriff's son, they would have acted differently. But what if a mouthy white Chicago kid had done the same? Would he have been killed as well? Maybe, maybe not. (Depends on their view of "Yankees".) We don't know.

    But we can be sure that in such a case, the jury would have "deliberated" a bit longer. We forget (or aren't told) that the real scandal to mid-1950s Americans wasn't the crime itself, but the offhand exoneration.

    Similar to how the draft-card burners a decade later weren't protesting the draft itself, but the war. (They weren't being cowards, they were being politicians.) What looks like a minor detail can alter one's view of the entire situation.

    Replies: @CBart, @Jack D, @Anonymous

    If it were true that they were protesting the war and not the draft then why did all the protests stop after the draft was stopped while the war continued?

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @CBart


    If it were true that they were protesting the war and not the draft then why did all the protests stop after the draft was stopped while the war continued?
     
    Huh? The burning protests were in the mid-1960s. The draft ended in 1973.


    https://image.pbs.org/video-assets/pbs/stories-service/170456/images/mezzanine_179.jpg


    The protests didn't stop, they just took different forms. E.g., putting women, who did not have cards to burn, out front, as at Kent State. More effective.

    There were plenty of avenues around the draft-- student deferment, conscientious objection, medical excuses from a sympathetic doctor, a one-way trip to Montréal or Malmö... Why commit a public felony in front of cameras?


    Besides, many, perhaps most, of the protestors came right out and said they'd be willing to go had the war been "just". That's pretty stupid if it's the draft itself you're protesting. It undercuts the whole point.

    Conscription laws in the US-- and presumably elsewhere-- don't allow you to pick and choose your battles. That's what enlistment is for.

  99. @Reg Cæsar
    @Jack D


    He really was murdered for racist reasons...
     
    We don't know that, and we can't. Had this been the local sheriff's son, they would have acted differently. But what if a mouthy white Chicago kid had done the same? Would he have been killed as well? Maybe, maybe not. (Depends on their view of "Yankees".) We don't know.

    But we can be sure that in such a case, the jury would have "deliberated" a bit longer. We forget (or aren't told) that the real scandal to mid-1950s Americans wasn't the crime itself, but the offhand exoneration.

    Similar to how the draft-card burners a decade later weren't protesting the draft itself, but the war. (They weren't being cowards, they were being politicians.) What looks like a minor detail can alter one's view of the entire situation.

    Replies: @CBart, @Jack D, @Anonymous

    As I said before, Till stands not just for his own death at the hands of white trash, but for the whole system that existed to deprive blacks of the promises of legal equality made in the 14th Amendment and which permeated Southern society and government.

    Personally I doubt that if Till had been a white kid from Chicago that he would have been killed. A white teenager did not threaten the social order in the way that Till did. Carolyn Bryant was able to stay alone in an isolated store in an all black community because of the regime of fear created by Mississippi whites. Killing a white teen would not have served to maintain the regime of fear.

    Even under the unwritten code of the South, Till deserved no more than a thorough beating. Although the code of the South did not permit his killers to be convicted, neither were they hailed as local heroes – in fact they were shunned by the locals and had to move away because they had also broken the local social order (and indeed helped immeasurably to bring about the end of that order). The fact that Till was black and seen as less than human (also that he continued to mouth off to them) is what caused his killers to escalate from a mere beating to murder. In fact, THEY are the ones who should be getting monuments for that reason. Till would have probably end up dead or in prison in Chicago anyway but for their intervention. But nobody puts up statues of Pontius Pilate either.

    For whatever reason, just or unjust, sometimes random dufuses become symbolic heroes. Blacks being blacks, they have more random dufuses than most – Rodney King, George Floyd, etc. Rosa Parks was not a random dufus and neither was Homer Plessy because they were both carefully chosen in advance to be test defendants.

    • Replies: @Alden
    @Jack D

    The Bryant’s weren’t trash. They were prosperous business owners and farmers. The store was just a side business. They owned a couple farms, maybe 3. Land ownership the farms and the store.

    Were all the thousands of Jews who owned small stores in the 1950s alps White trash? By your definition running a small store is trash then allthise Jewish small store owners were White trash too. Chicken farm in New Jersey cotton farm in the south. What’s the difference?

    Replies: @nebulafox, @Art Deco

  100. @Art Deco
    @Jack D

    who did not deserve them.
    ==
    You don't understand what ordinary people value.

    Replies: @Jack D

    All over the former E. Bloc there were thousands of statues of Lenin (and for a while, Stalin). Were they there because the locals valued them? To the extent that Civil War generals were popular in the South, part of that was a massive, organized propaganda campaign that was quite successful in brainwashing people. In some places in the E. Bloc, Lenin and Stalin also enjoyed a lot of popularity among ordinary people. For that matter, the ordinary people of German admired Hitler for a while.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Jack D

    Hitler enjoyed massive overwhelming support nearly unto his death. In stark contrast to Roosevelt who was despised by maybe half the Us population and Churchill who was voted out of office within weeks of the allied victory in Europe.

    Replies: @Ralph L

    , @Wilkey
    @Jack D


    To the extent that Civil War generals were popular in the South, part of that was a massive, organized propaganda campaign that was quite successful in brainwashing people.
     
    The Confederate States of America was not the result of a military coup. Secession was decided by vote of the democratically-elected state legislatures in all eleven states that joined the CSA. Granted those legislatures weren't elected by blacks or women, but whaddaya whaddaya? Women didn't vote in the North, either. That was democracy of the time. Three states - Texas, Tennessee, and Virginia - even held referendums, which was not the usual way to decide such things back then.

    In other words, the generals leading the Confederate armies were not traitors. They were leading armies established by the duly elected leaders of their newly established country. Those generals didn't even invade the North. They weren't trying to destroy their old nation, but simply fighting to defend - defend - their new one.

    Nations don't survive forever. It is quite natural for nations to grow, shrink, change, break apart, and reform. Would you call responses to all those changes, by people who no longer feel their region/state/whatever belongs in their current country, "traitorous"? Were the voters in the UK who voted for Brexit traitors? Are Basques, Catalans or Scotsmen who want to leave their respective countries traitors?

    You might as well ban divorce. Why not just call any woman who wants to leave her abusive husband a traitorous, no-good bitch as well, yes?

    Again, I don't have much truck with the "Lost Cause." I don't have any love for slavery and think that, overall, it was better for the South that they remained in the Union. Were some of them brainwashed into supporting an institution that was not only bad for the slaves but for the rest of the South, as well? Sure, maybe. It was the economy they had at the time, and it was tough for them to imagine anything different.

    The South's economic struggles in the century following the end of slavery, and their eternal struggle to successfully integrate the descendants of those slaves, with their insanely high crime rates and overall low human capital, suggests the Southerners fearing the end of slavery were absolutely correct to do so.

    But the men who commanded the Southern armies weren't traitors, and Southerners have every right and reason to still hold their generals in some esteem. Our heroes aren't perfect. There is a lot of myth surrounding most of them, or maybe even all of them. But we need them. And to tell a people that they aren't allowed to have them, that they are evil for having them, is just - as I said before - obnoxiously stupid.

    Now maybe we can leave a pointless argument over statues and parks and schools and military bases alone and fight a political battle worth fighting, like the invasion currently happening across our southern border?

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    , @rebel yell
    @Jack D

    In this and past posts you've repeatedly called Confederates traitors and compared them to Nazis and Stalinists. Others have pointed out that loyalty to your state, then or now, is not treasonous. And fighting for your right to self-government is not a bad cause. The real issue in 1860 was not slavery or tariffs, but whether white southerners or white northerners would decide those issues for the South. Nothing wrong with insisting on home rule.
    As for Nazis and Stalinists, I'll say again you can as easily accuse Jewish Israelis of Nazi behavior. Jewish Israelis kill Arabs to steal their land, no? Jews were terrorists, blowing up hotels, no? Robert E Lee never blew up a hotel full of civilians. Israelis who did that were later Prime Ministers.


    To the extent that Civil War generals were popular in the South, part of that was a massive, organized propaganda campaign that was quite successful in brainwashing people
     
    Another of your smears, that there is something phony about Confederate statues and memorials. Southern people revered their soldiers from day one. Your description of a propaganda campaign to create astroturf memorials more aptly describes Holocaust memorials in the US.
    In past posts you pointed to the fact that Confederate statues were not finally built until many years after the war as proof that the sentiments were fake. Does that same reasoning apply to Holocaust memorials built 70 years after WWII? Does that reasoning apply to memorials to Northern Generals that were built in the same era the Southern statues went up, or the Lincoln Memorial which was not built until 1922?

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Peter Akuleyev

    , @Hypnotoad666
    @Jack D


    To the extent that Civil War generals were popular in the South, part of that was a massive, organized propaganda campaign that was quite successful in brainwashing people.
     
    To the extent Emmitt Till is popular it's because of a massive, organized propaganda campaign that was quite successful in brainwashing people. But that's different because . . . you agree with the modern brainwashing?

    There is nothing heroic or inspirational about Till. He was just a little punk who ended up dead for sexually harassing the wrong guy's woman. That's not a good thing, but it's happened to thousands of black guys over the years. You can condemn Till's killers if you want. But "Honoring" Till is preposterous. The only point is to buttress the anti-white narrative of collective shame that is considered so politically useful.

    If being the victim of an interracial crime is cause for honor, then they need to put up monuments to the two Italian women raped and murdered by Till Sr. In fact, the whole country would be thick with monuments to black murder victims. (Kitty Genovese springs immediately to mind as a good candidate for her own "shame on black people" monument.)

    Actually, since the cost of real estate would be prohibitive for thousands of individual monuments to blacks' victims, we would have to do something like the Vietnam Memorial: A grim list carved in stone of the thousands of white victims raped and murdered by blacks. It would be a place where victims' relatives could gather and light candles and reflect on "never again" policies.

    Since you believe that promoting memory of interracial crime is a good thing, you must agree with this proposal. Let the national healing begin!

    , @Art Deco
    @Jack D

    The East bloc regimes were satrapies of Soviet Russia, bar Yugoslavia, Albania, and, to a degree, Roumania. All of the regimes did great violence to civil society and vernacular culture (and none more so than the Albanian and Roumanian regimes). I'm not seeing the analogy, here. And you don't seem to be able to distinguish between popular culture and state media.
    ==
    People are loyal to their relatives, loyal to their ancestors, loyal to the places where they grew up. They are loyal to certain ideals manifest in people's daily lives. The statues are coming down because callow people want to piss on those ancestors, those places, those ideals. This isn't that difficult.

    , @mc23
    @Jack D

    Almost ten percent of Confederate men died serving in the Civil War. The damage to the towns and countryside was immense causing widespread civilian suffering.

    They didn't need a propaganda campaign to memorialize their dead and suffering. The war was mythologized as the pernicious Noble Lost Cause by the South but that's a different story

    Replies: @Anon

  101. @Reg Cæsar
    @Mike Tre


    If we’re going to speak in correct terms, then let’s call these three what they really were: Invasive communist seditious provocateurs.
     
    Like Rachel Corrie?

    Replies: @Pixo

    Beep beep! Beep beep!

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    @Pixo

    Great to see that you relish the death of a young white woman. Fits your character to a T.

    Replies: @Pixo

  102. @res
    @Jack D


    He really was murdered for racist reasons and it’s not wrong to have a monument to him.
     
    If that is the standard there will be many monuments. In history how many people have been murdered because they were part of an outgroup and behaving badly? As you note the scandalous part is more that his killers got off scot-free.

    How do you feel about the (double?) standard that monuments to Robert E Lee (etc.) are beyond the pale? (rereading your comment I guess you answered that in the earlier part, interesting how many of those traitors served the US honorably in the Mexican War and years leading up to the Civil War)

    Replies: @Wilkey, @Dmon, @Mike Tre

    Only the winners get to have statues. It’s why you can have a statue of David Yulee but not Robert E. Lee, or Anne Frank (in Idaho!) but not Mary Phagan.

  103. Anonymous[356] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jack D
    @Art Deco

    All over the former E. Bloc there were thousands of statues of Lenin (and for a while, Stalin). Were they there because the locals valued them? To the extent that Civil War generals were popular in the South, part of that was a massive, organized propaganda campaign that was quite successful in brainwashing people. In some places in the E. Bloc, Lenin and Stalin also enjoyed a lot of popularity among ordinary people. For that matter, the ordinary people of German admired Hitler for a while.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Wilkey, @rebel yell, @Hypnotoad666, @Art Deco, @mc23

    Hitler enjoyed massive overwhelming support nearly unto his death. In stark contrast to Roosevelt who was despised by maybe half the Us population and Churchill who was voted out of office within weeks of the allied victory in Europe.

    • Replies: @Ralph L
    @Anonymous

    For obvious reasons, Eleanor was widely hated by white Southerners who voted automatically for her husband. I found a pamphlet about her in my great aunt's stuff. Kinda wish I'd saved it.

  104. @AnotherDad
    Sounds like this monument is only for Emmett Till. That seems disrespectful to all the other rapists in training who were violently denied the opportunity to perfect their craft.

    Replies: @Ralph L, @Jim Don Bob, @Kylie, @Barnard

    How many years away are we from forcing the Italians to put up a memorial to his father. The Army will make a payment to any remaining Till descendents.

  105. @Jack D
    @AnotherDad

    Not a chance. This is a one way ratchet - Dems put stuff like this in place and then GOP maintains it. The chances of a rollback are zero. Are you some kind of racist or sumthin?

    And no your national separation is not happening. Stop fantasizing. Whiteland has as much chance of materializing as Wakanda.

    Goodness knows that for 100 years there were monuments throughout the South for traitorous generals (some still stand) who did not deserve them. Those generals got a lot of Americans killed for an unjust cause (the right to own other human beings). A Martian would say that it's nuts that we put up statues of those guys. Who won the Civil War? Do they have statues of Nazis in Germany?

    Till did not live long enough to kill anyone. He really was murdered for racist reasons and it's not wrong to have a monument to him. Yes, his character and what he did was questionable but he did not deserve death.

    Replies: @bomag, @Reg Cæsar, @res, @Wilkey, @Art Deco, @Reg Cæsar, @AceDeuce, @pyrrhus, @Alden, @AnotherDad, @AnotherDad, @Hypnotoad666, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @James N. Kennett

    The killing of Emmett Till was eugenic. How many rapist sons grandsons and great grandsons would he have left as his criminal rapist legacy had he lived.

    Back in the 1930s a study began to discover if rape was a genetic thing. Rape victims who got pregnant with boys who kept and raised the sons of the rapists were contacted. The mothers promised to allow the researchers to follow their sons for life.

    1930s 40s when all the intellectuals and not really experts believed in nurture may nature. The researchers obtained a variety of mothers and sons from different regions economic status ethnicities religion etc to obtain a large number of subjects.

    The results of the study was amazing. By age 25, 40 percent of the sons of rapists had been convicted not just accused of rape. By 30 even more had been convicted of rape.

    Genetics and DNA rule. It’s a good thing the inherited Till rapist gene was removed from the gene pool.

    • Agree: Adam Smith
    • Replies: @res
    @Alden


    Back in the 1930s a study began to discover if rape was a genetic thing. Rape victims who got pregnant with boys who kept and raised the sons of the rapists were contacted. The mothers promised to allow the researchers to follow their sons for life.

    1930s 40s when all the intellectuals and not really experts believed in nurture may nature. The researchers obtained a variety of mothers and sons from different regions economic status ethnicities religion etc to obtain a large number of subjects.

    The results of the study was amazing. By age 25, 40 percent of the sons of rapists had been convicted not just accused of rape. By 30 even more had been convicted of rape.
     

    That sounds believable, but I have not been able to find the study. Based on your comment it sounds like the study would have been done in the 1960s or later (at least 30 years old after birth in the 1930s?). Can you offer any information (e.g. authors, publication date, keywords, notable aspects like location which might help a search) to help me look?

    Some links I ran across while looking. First, to tie this into the current victim culture (from the UK).

    Daisy’s Law’: New Research Commissioned By Centre For Women’s Justice Demonstrates Why Children Born From Rape Should Be Recognised As ‘Victims’ In Law

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pregnancy_from_rape

    https://trauma.blog.yorku.ca/2016/01/children-born-of-rape-face-a-painful-legacy/

    Growing Up Under a Shadow: Key Issues in Research on and Treatment of Children Born of Rape
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237268738_Growing_Up_Under_a_Shadow_Key_Issues_in_Research_on_and_Treatment_of_Children_Born_of_Rape

    Edit: finally realized "heritability rape" was a good search.

    Sexual offending runs in families: A 37-year nationwide study (Sweden)
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4469797


    genetic effects tended to be weaker for rape of an adult (19%) than for child molestation (46%).
     
    https://archive.nytimes.com/kristof.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/23/do-we-have-a-rape-gene/

    https://www.newsweek.com/can-we-blame-our-bad-behavior-stone-age-genes-80349

    Replies: @Alden

  106. @res
    @Jack D


    He really was murdered for racist reasons and it’s not wrong to have a monument to him.
     
    If that is the standard there will be many monuments. In history how many people have been murdered because they were part of an outgroup and behaving badly? As you note the scandalous part is more that his killers got off scot-free.

    How do you feel about the (double?) standard that monuments to Robert E Lee (etc.) are beyond the pale? (rereading your comment I guess you answered that in the earlier part, interesting how many of those traitors served the US honorably in the Mexican War and years leading up to the Civil War)

    Replies: @Wilkey, @Dmon, @Mike Tre

    “He really was murdered for racist reasons and it’s not wrong to have a monument to him. ”

    So was Mary Phagan, but hey hey, we don’t go there here.

    And I’ve read one of Till’s killers was in fact a negro.

    • Replies: @res
    @Mike Tre


    And I’ve read one of Till’s killers was in fact a negro.
     
    There were three black men involved. From what I can tell one was involved all the way through (Levi “Too Tight” Collins ).

    This comment has quotes and references.
    https://www.unz.com/isteve/nyt-questions-swirl-after-yet-another-emmett-till-sign-comes-down/#comment-4886406

    Also see this comment.
    https://www.unz.com/isteve/emmett-tills-victim-dies-before-she-can-by-lynched/#comment-5937485
  107. @Jack D
    @AnotherDad

    Not a chance. This is a one way ratchet - Dems put stuff like this in place and then GOP maintains it. The chances of a rollback are zero. Are you some kind of racist or sumthin?

    And no your national separation is not happening. Stop fantasizing. Whiteland has as much chance of materializing as Wakanda.

    Goodness knows that for 100 years there were monuments throughout the South for traitorous generals (some still stand) who did not deserve them. Those generals got a lot of Americans killed for an unjust cause (the right to own other human beings). A Martian would say that it's nuts that we put up statues of those guys. Who won the Civil War? Do they have statues of Nazis in Germany?

    Till did not live long enough to kill anyone. He really was murdered for racist reasons and it's not wrong to have a monument to him. Yes, his character and what he did was questionable but he did not deserve death.

    Replies: @bomag, @Reg Cæsar, @res, @Wilkey, @Art Deco, @Reg Cæsar, @AceDeuce, @pyrrhus, @Alden, @AnotherDad, @AnotherDad, @Hypnotoad666, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @James N. Kennett

    Oh boy, you’re in fine minoritarian narrative spinning this morning there Jack. Whitey be racist oppressors. You should write for the NYT.

    traitorous generals

    I’m a republican. I’m for a nation of free high wage/high productivity people governing themselves. I’ve got zero use for slavery, serfdom, nor the “must have immigration!” cheap labor shills–any of their sleazy ideologies or systems. That goes for the Confederacy.

    But these generals were following along with what their states had decided–to leave the Union. I think their system is vile and backward and secession was stupid, but they were loyal to the people in their states and communities who had voted in secession. And fighting a Union army seeking to overthrow that decision by invading their states.

    Compare to our “elite” of “must have immigration!” shills, intentionally selling out and trashing the future of the American people and their posterity. Those scum are actually disloyal and truly “traitorous” to the people and nation they owe loyalty to.

    He really was murdered for racist reasons

    Till was not murdered randomly. He was murdered for putting his hands on another man’s wife–or at least scaring the bejesus out of her so she went running to car for her gun. This sort of stuff has led to plenty of beatings and murders down through the ages. The he was black–and a apparently stubbornly unrepentant–along with the low character of Roy Bryant and his half brother were what juiced this to murder. And yes, the racial context of Jim Crow–not wanting to tell blacks that Till’s behavior would be tolerated–was what got Bryant and Milam off.

    But this was hardly, like “these black guys have taken our jobs” or “we don’t like these people and are going to run them out of town” murder. It was a husband’s very personal beef with Till’s crude behavior toward his wife.

    and it’s not wrong to have a monument to him.

    Wow. The Asians are going to claim a whole bunch of these “racist reasons murder” national monuments. But I think I’ll stick with my gal Kylie and drag the grandkids to The Channon Christian and Christopher Newsome Racist Murder National Monument (the CCCNRMNM). I look forward to the “Biden” administration announcing that.

    • Thanks: Kylie
    • Replies: @Hypnotoad666
    @AnotherDad

    Robert E. Lee was not a traitor to his country, because his country was Virginia.

    (If Jack D had a gun to his head and had to choose, I strongly suspect he'd choose his tribe over the Goverment of the United States on any day of the week.)

    Replies: @Corvinus

    , @Ed Case
    @AnotherDad

    And yes, the racial context of Jim Crow–not wanting to tell blacks that Till’s behavior would be tolerated–was what got Bryant and Milam off.

    That's not right at all.
    2 of Milam's Black contractors did the beating, by the time Till's eye was hanging out, the decision was made that it was too late to let him go, and one of the Blacks put a bullet in his brain.

    Once Till's body was found, local Law Enforcement took the 2 to Alabama and locked them up there under false names until the Trial had concluded.
    Had investigators found them, they woulda been States Witnesses and, being eyewitnesses, Bryant and Milam woulda been Executed.

    , @Pirate King of Arkansas
    @AnotherDad

    Thank You for your comment regarding Channon Christian & Christopher Newsome.

    I had the exact same thought immediately after reading this abomination of an announcement that defies all logic, rationale, & reason.

    Beyond appalling. Beyond sickening.

  108. @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY)
    @Wilkey

    Wilkey writes, "We’ve added two new paid federal holidays in my lifetime – both celebrating America’s most thoughtful and productive demographic".

    Please pardon my ignorance, but what are these two holidays, and what is this demographic?

    Replies: @Wilkey

    Martin Luther King Day (1983) and Juneteenth (2021).

    Incidentally, Memorial Day and Columbus Day only became federal holidays in 1968. That’s still nearly a decade before I was born, but I never would have guessed they were that recent.

    • Replies: @AnotherDad
    @Wilkey


    Incidentally, Memorial Day and Columbus Day only became federal holidays in 1968.
     
    No we've celebrated Memorial Day my entire life. I believe since after the Civil War. It was however on May 30th until I was a teenager then flopped over to be a Monday holiday matching Labor Day.

    Columbus Day was also around--just as a day. But only became a federal holiday about the same time as the Memorial Day switch to Monday.


    Ok gone and looked it up:
    Indeed the same piece of legislation--signed in '68, into use in '71:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Monday_Holiday_Act
    , @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY)
    @Wilkey

    Thanks.

    Replies: @Anon

    , @Ralph L
    @Wilkey

    Some states were still officially celebrating Confederate Memorial Day, usually around April 26. Civil rights and the centennial caused renewed interest, which may have led the Feds to make theirs official.

    , @RadicalCenter
    @Wilkey

    We should add two more federal holidays. A popular political compromise would be Irish Heritage Day on “Saint” Patrick’s Day plus a Mexican Heritage Day on Cinco de Mayo. That covers two of the largest ethno-cultural groups/influences in the country. Perhaps the two largest, at this point.

    This wouldn’t directly benefit only government employees, but also employees of banks and most corporations.

    Let tens of millions of people spend more time with their families, resting, exercising, and in our case learning — less time polluting the air and water with stressful commutes. We can still get done what needs to be done.

    Some small businesses that choose to remain open would be busier, especially restaurants.

    Replies: @Wilkey

  109. @Achmed E. Newman
    Money, Mississippi is just too far off (to the west) of the Natchez Trace Parkway* to make a good side trip. Perhaps we'll check it out on the way to the world's biggest ball of yarn.

    .

    * A really nice drive, but fill up your car in Tupelo or Jackson, depending. Going south, I came into Jackson on fumes.

    Replies: @Calvin Hobbes, @pyrrhus, @AnotherDad

    * A really nice drive, but fill up your car in Tupelo or Jackson, depending. Going south, I came into Jackson on fumes.

    Excellent advice.

    I’ve only done a little of the Natchez Trace 15 or so back and probably won’t be doing much more as it does not naturally line up directionally with our Florida-to/from-world driving pattern. We did a day on the Blue Ridge Parkway when we headed north last summer.

    These national parkways are fun. You won’t make freeway style speed/progress. But they are very pleasant drives. However, you really do need to fire up gas buddy or google or whatever the night before, find your reasonably priced and accessible gas stations, have a “gas plan” and execute it. There won’t be a Buc-ee’s or a Costco right off the parkway.

  110. @Anon
    American and British normies like to talk about conservatives and people living in places like China and Russia being brainwashed, but the fact that unusual white-on-black murders such as those of Emmett Till and Stephen Lawrence play such an outsized role in racial discourse in both countries is truly flabbergasting.

    I suspect more whites are murdered by blacks every year in both countries than blacks who have ever been murdered by whites. Till and Lawrence are the ultimate “man bites dog” news stories.

    Replies: @Hypnotoad666

    I suspect more whites are murdered by blacks every year in both countries than blacks who have ever been murdered by whites. Till and Lawrence are the ultimate “man bites dog” news stories.

    Members of the Till family murdered two white women (that we know of), and two of its members were killed by whites (one judicial, one extra-judicial). So even looking at just the Till family, it’s a 2-2, tie.

  111. @Jack D
    @Art Deco

    All over the former E. Bloc there were thousands of statues of Lenin (and for a while, Stalin). Were they there because the locals valued them? To the extent that Civil War generals were popular in the South, part of that was a massive, organized propaganda campaign that was quite successful in brainwashing people. In some places in the E. Bloc, Lenin and Stalin also enjoyed a lot of popularity among ordinary people. For that matter, the ordinary people of German admired Hitler for a while.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Wilkey, @rebel yell, @Hypnotoad666, @Art Deco, @mc23

    To the extent that Civil War generals were popular in the South, part of that was a massive, organized propaganda campaign that was quite successful in brainwashing people.

    The Confederate States of America was not the result of a military coup. Secession was decided by vote of the democratically-elected state legislatures in all eleven states that joined the CSA. Granted those legislatures weren’t elected by blacks or women, but whaddaya whaddaya? Women didn’t vote in the North, either. That was democracy of the time. Three states – Texas, Tennessee, and Virginia – even held referendums, which was not the usual way to decide such things back then.

    In other words, the generals leading the Confederate armies were not traitors. They were leading armies established by the duly elected leaders of their newly established country. Those generals didn’t even invade the North. They weren’t trying to destroy their old nation, but simply fighting to defend – defend – their new one.

    Nations don’t survive forever. It is quite natural for nations to grow, shrink, change, break apart, and reform. Would you call responses to all those changes, by people who no longer feel their region/state/whatever belongs in their current country, “traitorous”? Were the voters in the UK who voted for Brexit traitors? Are Basques, Catalans or Scotsmen who want to leave their respective countries traitors?

    You might as well ban divorce. Why not just call any woman who wants to leave her abusive husband a traitorous, no-good bitch as well, yes?

    Again, I don’t have much truck with the “Lost Cause.” I don’t have any love for slavery and think that, overall, it was better for the South that they remained in the Union. Were some of them brainwashed into supporting an institution that was not only bad for the slaves but for the rest of the South, as well? Sure, maybe. It was the economy they had at the time, and it was tough for them to imagine anything different.

    The South’s economic struggles in the century following the end of slavery, and their eternal struggle to successfully integrate the descendants of those slaves, with their insanely high crime rates and overall low human capital, suggests the Southerners fearing the end of slavery were absolutely correct to do so.

    But the men who commanded the Southern armies weren’t traitors, and Southerners have every right and reason to still hold their generals in some esteem. Our heroes aren’t perfect. There is a lot of myth surrounding most of them, or maybe even all of them. But we need them. And to tell a people that they aren’t allowed to have them, that they are evil for having them, is just – as I said before – obnoxiously stupid.

    Now maybe we can leave a pointless argument over statues and parks and schools and military bases alone and fight a political battle worth fighting, like the invasion currently happening across our southern border?

    • Thanks: AndrewR, Achmed E. Newman
    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @Wilkey


    overall low human capital
     
    But, strangely, not low enough to remove altogether.

    suggests the Southerners fearing the end of slavery were absolutely correct to do so.
     
    Had the slaves been freed in Panama, as a certain railroad lawyer proposed, what would there have been to fear?
  112. @NotAnonymousHere
    @Dan Smith

    #15 @Dan Smith:


    As everyone ought to know, lynching involves removal of an accused criminal from proper authorities by civilians.
     
    No one knows that because it's not true. You suck.

    Replies: @Dan Smith, @Art Deco

    Thanks for showing off your ignorance. Schoolyard taunts have zero effect.

  113. @Jack D
    @AnotherDad

    Not a chance. This is a one way ratchet - Dems put stuff like this in place and then GOP maintains it. The chances of a rollback are zero. Are you some kind of racist or sumthin?

    And no your national separation is not happening. Stop fantasizing. Whiteland has as much chance of materializing as Wakanda.

    Goodness knows that for 100 years there were monuments throughout the South for traitorous generals (some still stand) who did not deserve them. Those generals got a lot of Americans killed for an unjust cause (the right to own other human beings). A Martian would say that it's nuts that we put up statues of those guys. Who won the Civil War? Do they have statues of Nazis in Germany?

    Till did not live long enough to kill anyone. He really was murdered for racist reasons and it's not wrong to have a monument to him. Yes, his character and what he did was questionable but he did not deserve death.

    Replies: @bomag, @Reg Cæsar, @res, @Wilkey, @Art Deco, @Reg Cæsar, @AceDeuce, @pyrrhus, @Alden, @AnotherDad, @AnotherDad, @Hypnotoad666, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @James N. Kennett

    And no your national separation is not happening. Stop fantasizing. Whiteland has as much chance of materializing as Wakanda.

    It’s not “whiteland” but “America”–a nation for normal productive non-nutty Americans … who are loyal to America. But otherwise, yeah. On this one, sadly, here you are most likely right.

    But it is still something to worth wishing for, working for–and if it comes to it–fighting for. Ordinary Americans deserve to have a nation of normal productive self-governing Americans who value the old sane stuff like “borders” and “rule of law” and are loyal to each other and “to ourselves our posterity”.

    (And while the minoritarians don not deserve a nation … to achieve separation, they need to get one. And I would be happy to see it … just to enjoy the shit show! Parasites without a host. LOL.)

    But yeah, our likely future is “slumping toward Brazil”. We’ll have Holocaust Memorials and Emmett Till National Monuments and Stonewall Memorials and Lea Thomas Statues and kindergarten tranny story hour and “Reparations” as Africans swarm across our “nation of immigrants” memorial political boundary line (“border” being racist) … while the Chinese do eugenic genetic engineering and engineer race targeted bioweapons.

    My grandkids will sure as hell wish they could live in my fantasy.

    • Thanks: bomag
    • Replies: @Pixo
    @AnotherDad

    “ while the Chinese do eugenic genetic engineering and engineer race targeted bioweapons.”

    Chinese show more opposition to human genetic engineering than Americans in one poll I saw. They also jailed one IVF guy for cloning a human being.

    I think California’s combo of very high incomes, lots of nerds who wait until they are 38-45 to plan for kids, and aspie transhumanism means we’ll take the lead.

    I find race targeted bioweapons implausible. What are they going to do, target wet earwax and chest hair?

    Replies: @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    , @Legba
    @AnotherDad

    My grandkids will sure as hell wish they could live in my fantasy.

    So do I.

    , @Jim Don Bob
    @AnotherDad

    The always excellent Micheal Anton: https://compactmag.com/article/the-pessimistic-case-for-the-future

    Replies: @res

    , @Ennui
    @AnotherDad

    Normal Americans invaded the world in their arrogance. The world came back. Everywhere we have large numbers of new arrivals from are places our military went adventuring. There were plenty of examples from recent and ancient history of empires following soldiers back home, but I guess normal Americans or the people they voted for didn't think history applied to their exceptional nation.

    They got what they asked for. They had their chances going back to William Jennings Bryan, Lindbergh, and Bob Taft. They had a more recent chance with Buchanan and Ron Paul. But normies don't like pessimism, they like retired serious daddies like Ike, or charmers like JFK and Reagan, they love fairy tales with soaring eagles. So no complaints, they got what they asked for.

    Same with the Brits, they had their Enoch Powells, but decided instead to go Thatcher and Blair.

  114. @Jack D
    @AnotherDad

    Not a chance. This is a one way ratchet - Dems put stuff like this in place and then GOP maintains it. The chances of a rollback are zero. Are you some kind of racist or sumthin?

    And no your national separation is not happening. Stop fantasizing. Whiteland has as much chance of materializing as Wakanda.

    Goodness knows that for 100 years there were monuments throughout the South for traitorous generals (some still stand) who did not deserve them. Those generals got a lot of Americans killed for an unjust cause (the right to own other human beings). A Martian would say that it's nuts that we put up statues of those guys. Who won the Civil War? Do they have statues of Nazis in Germany?

    Till did not live long enough to kill anyone. He really was murdered for racist reasons and it's not wrong to have a monument to him. Yes, his character and what he did was questionable but he did not deserve death.

    Replies: @bomag, @Reg Cæsar, @res, @Wilkey, @Art Deco, @Reg Cæsar, @AceDeuce, @pyrrhus, @Alden, @AnotherDad, @AnotherDad, @Hypnotoad666, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @James N. Kennett

    A Martian would say that it’s nuts that we put up statues of those guys. Who won the Civil War? Do they have statues of Nazis in Germany?

    So your point is that blacks have won their civil war against white people, so it’s only right they get their statues now? I guess that has internal logic from your point of view.

    George Washington was a traitorous general, but I guess it’s only treason if you lose. For example, the traitorous Jews who rebelled against Rome in 69 A.D. I hope nobody is celebrating their treachery.

    • Replies: @kaganovitch
    @Hypnotoad666

    For example, the traitorous Jews who rebelled against Rome in 69 A.D. I hope nobody is celebrating their treachery.

    Traditionally, it was, indeed, not celebrated by Jews. The Talmud viewed it as an infamy forced on the population by the zealot party. It was only with the advent of modern Zionism and its valorization of martial virtues that the revolt was romanticised. In any case the Roman revolt was against an occupying force not a national divorce like the Civil War, so not entirely analogous. I do agree though that the North's insistence on enforcing union was not legit.

  115. @AceDeuce
    Joementia should send “Doctor Jill” to go down there for the grand opening and she can let negro males rub up on her and talk sexual smack, a la young Emmett, to her for the entire day as penance.

    Hey, and North America wasn’t the only continent enriched by the Till family. Europe should pay tribute to rapey-killy Daddy Louis Till, who enriched Italy with his presence. A special section could be set up for fellow negro rapey-killy GI Fred McMurray, who was with Till and was tried and hanged for the same offenses (one murder and two rapes).

    BTW LOL: Here’s how Cuckipedia leads off the article about Louis Till:

    Louis Till (February 7, 1922 – July 2, 1945) was an African American GI during World War II.
     
    LOL. Yeah, and Jeffrey Dahmer (1960-1994) was a “White candy factory worker and aspiring amateur chef.”

    Fun Fact: Louis Till was born in Cape Girardeau, Mo. which means that he and Rush Limbaugh were from the same hometown.

    Replies: @Art Deco

    He was born in New Madrid, Mo, about 50 miles from Cape Girardeau.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @Art Deco


    He was born in New Madrid, Mo, about 50 miles from Cape Girardeau.
     
    Site of the worst earthquake in US history, in 1811. Take that, Californians!

    https://www.purdue.edu/uns/images/+2009/earthquake-damage.jpg

    I stopped by their town museum just weeks before the SF-Oakland Series, and had quakes on the mind. Damn, had I only placed a bet! Imagine the payout!

    By the way, the accent is on the "mad-". Just as in Helsinki, it's on the "hell-"

    , @AceDeuce
    @Art Deco

    He may have been raised in New Madrid, Cliff Clavin, but he was born in Cape Girardeau.

    Replies: @Art Deco

  116. @Legba
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    Remember back when Madonna was fun, and not a pain in the ass?

    Not at all. I remember her as the talentless slut that she still is.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @The Germ Theory of Disease

    Desperately Seeking Susan was pretty entertaining.

  117. @NotAnonymousHere
    @Dan Smith

    #15 @Dan Smith:


    As everyone ought to know, lynching involves removal of an accused criminal from proper authorities by civilians.
     
    No one knows that because it's not true. You suck.

    Replies: @Dan Smith, @Art Deco

    It’s precisely true.

    • Troll: AceDeuce
  118. @Wilkey
    @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY)

    Martin Luther King Day (1983) and Juneteenth (2021).

    Incidentally, Memorial Day and Columbus Day only became federal holidays in 1968. That's still nearly a decade before I was born, but I never would have guessed they were that recent.

    Replies: @AnotherDad, @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY), @Ralph L, @RadicalCenter

    Incidentally, Memorial Day and Columbus Day only became federal holidays in 1968.

    No we’ve celebrated Memorial Day my entire life. I believe since after the Civil War. It was however on May 30th until I was a teenager then flopped over to be a Monday holiday matching Labor Day.

    Columbus Day was also around–just as a day. But only became a federal holiday about the same time as the Memorial Day switch to Monday.

    Ok gone and looked it up:
    Indeed the same piece of legislation–signed in ’68, into use in ’71:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Monday_Holiday_Act

  119. @AnotherDad
    @Jack D


    And no your national separation is not happening. Stop fantasizing. Whiteland has as much chance of materializing as Wakanda.
     
    It's not "whiteland" but "America"--a nation for normal productive non-nutty Americans ... who are loyal to America. But otherwise, yeah. On this one, sadly, here you are most likely right.

    But it is still something to worth wishing for, working for--and if it comes to it--fighting for. Ordinary Americans deserve to have a nation of normal productive self-governing Americans who value the old sane stuff like "borders" and "rule of law" and are loyal to each other and "to ourselves our posterity".

    (And while the minoritarians don not deserve a nation ... to achieve separation, they need to get one. And I would be happy to see it ... just to enjoy the shit show! Parasites without a host. LOL.)


    But yeah, our likely future is "slumping toward Brazil". We'll have Holocaust Memorials and Emmett Till National Monuments and Stonewall Memorials and Lea Thomas Statues and kindergarten tranny story hour and "Reparations" as Africans swarm across our "nation of immigrants" memorial political boundary line ("border" being racist) ... while the Chinese do eugenic genetic engineering and engineer race targeted bioweapons.

    My grandkids will sure as hell wish they could live in my fantasy.

    Replies: @Pixo, @Legba, @Jim Don Bob, @Ennui

    “ while the Chinese do eugenic genetic engineering and engineer race targeted bioweapons.”

    Chinese show more opposition to human genetic engineering than Americans in one poll I saw. They also jailed one IVF guy for cloning a human being.

    I think California’s combo of very high incomes, lots of nerds who wait until they are 38-45 to plan for kids, and aspie transhumanism means we’ll take the lead.

    I find race targeted bioweapons implausible. What are they going to do, target wet earwax and chest hair?

    • Replies: @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @Pixo

    East Asians have more scant facial/chest hair, but coarser/thicker, which can have dramatic effects:

    Japanese general 長岡 外史 Nagaoka Gaishi and some his Chinese acolytes

    https://i.postimg.cc/WbKGhfH4/906.jpg

    https://i.postimg.cc/g0b3KLdF/907.jpg

    https://i.postimg.cc/ry9cVBzS/905.jpg

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease

  120. @Jack D
    @Art Deco

    All over the former E. Bloc there were thousands of statues of Lenin (and for a while, Stalin). Were they there because the locals valued them? To the extent that Civil War generals were popular in the South, part of that was a massive, organized propaganda campaign that was quite successful in brainwashing people. In some places in the E. Bloc, Lenin and Stalin also enjoyed a lot of popularity among ordinary people. For that matter, the ordinary people of German admired Hitler for a while.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Wilkey, @rebel yell, @Hypnotoad666, @Art Deco, @mc23

    In this and past posts you’ve repeatedly called Confederates traitors and compared them to Nazis and Stalinists. Others have pointed out that loyalty to your state, then or now, is not treasonous. And fighting for your right to self-government is not a bad cause. The real issue in 1860 was not slavery or tariffs, but whether white southerners or white northerners would decide those issues for the South. Nothing wrong with insisting on home rule.
    As for Nazis and Stalinists, I’ll say again you can as easily accuse Jewish Israelis of Nazi behavior. Jewish Israelis kill Arabs to steal their land, no? Jews were terrorists, blowing up hotels, no? Robert E Lee never blew up a hotel full of civilians. Israelis who did that were later Prime Ministers.

    To the extent that Civil War generals were popular in the South, part of that was a massive, organized propaganda campaign that was quite successful in brainwashing people

    Another of your smears, that there is something phony about Confederate statues and memorials. Southern people revered their soldiers from day one. Your description of a propaganda campaign to create astroturf memorials more aptly describes Holocaust memorials in the US.
    In past posts you pointed to the fact that Confederate statues were not finally built until many years after the war as proof that the sentiments were fake. Does that same reasoning apply to Holocaust memorials built 70 years after WWII? Does that reasoning apply to memorials to Northern Generals that were built in the same era the Southern statues went up, or the Lincoln Memorial which was not built until 1922?

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @rebel yell


    Robert E Lee never blew up a hotel full of civilians.
     
    Nor did William T Sherman.

    Israelis who did that were later Prime Ministers.
     
    I'm sure there were "hotels full of civilians" in Hamburg, Berlin, and Dresden, as well.


    https://images.fineartamerica.com/images/artworkimages/mediumlarge/2/eisenhower-and-churchill-at-airport-bettmann.jpg
    , @Peter Akuleyev
    @rebel yell

    Fair enough that the Confederate Generals were not “traitors”. Nonetheless they were mostly a contemptible group of elites who dragged hundreds of thousands of young Southern white men to their deaths in a war to protect the property rights of a small minority (and not just any property rights, we are talking about the right to import and breed Africans in the US, a property right that has done tremendous long term damage to the US). Anyone who waves a Confederate flag has no right to complain about elites trying to replace white
    people. That was the core value of the CSA.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @Colin Wright

  121. Suppose we could have a serious conversation on the subject of what is the best deal we could give the blacks without running the country into the ground. Something symbolic like this, yeah, I would throw that into the deal.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    @SF


    'Suppose we could have a serious conversation on the subject of what is the best deal we could give the blacks without running the country into the ground. Something symbolic like this, yeah, I would throw that into the deal.'
     
    Whatever 'deal' you offer blacks. they will (and do) just demand more. Offer them civil rights, and they demand reparations.

    I say we should give them what is convenient for us, what they can handle, and what will work: Jim Crow.

    For those who don't like it, we'll offer a free one-way plane ticket to the African nation of their choice.

    Replies: @Big P, @nebulafox

  122. @Jack D
    @Art Deco

    All over the former E. Bloc there were thousands of statues of Lenin (and for a while, Stalin). Were they there because the locals valued them? To the extent that Civil War generals were popular in the South, part of that was a massive, organized propaganda campaign that was quite successful in brainwashing people. In some places in the E. Bloc, Lenin and Stalin also enjoyed a lot of popularity among ordinary people. For that matter, the ordinary people of German admired Hitler for a while.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Wilkey, @rebel yell, @Hypnotoad666, @Art Deco, @mc23

    To the extent that Civil War generals were popular in the South, part of that was a massive, organized propaganda campaign that was quite successful in brainwashing people.

    To the extent Emmitt Till is popular it’s because of a massive, organized propaganda campaign that was quite successful in brainwashing people. But that’s different because . . . you agree with the modern brainwashing?

    There is nothing heroic or inspirational about Till. He was just a little punk who ended up dead for sexually harassing the wrong guy’s woman. That’s not a good thing, but it’s happened to thousands of black guys over the years. You can condemn Till’s killers if you want. But “Honoring” Till is preposterous. The only point is to buttress the anti-white narrative of collective shame that is considered so politically useful.

    If being the victim of an interracial crime is cause for honor, then they need to put up monuments to the two Italian women raped and murdered by Till Sr. In fact, the whole country would be thick with monuments to black murder victims. (Kitty Genovese springs immediately to mind as a good candidate for her own “shame on black people” monument.)

    Actually, since the cost of real estate would be prohibitive for thousands of individual monuments to blacks’ victims, we would have to do something like the Vietnam Memorial: A grim list carved in stone of the thousands of white victims raped and murdered by blacks. It would be a place where victims’ relatives could gather and light candles and reflect on “never again” policies.

    Since you believe that promoting memory of interracial crime is a good thing, you must agree with this proposal. Let the national healing begin!

  123. @CBart
    @Reg Cæsar

    If it were true that they were protesting the war and not the draft then why did all the protests stop after the draft was stopped while the war continued?

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    If it were true that they were protesting the war and not the draft then why did all the protests stop after the draft was stopped while the war continued?

    Huh? The burning protests were in the mid-1960s. The draft ended in 1973.

    The protests didn’t stop, they just took different forms. E.g., putting women, who did not have cards to burn, out front, as at Kent State. More effective.

    There were plenty of avenues around the draft– student deferment, conscientious objection, medical excuses from a sympathetic doctor, a one-way trip to Montréal or Malmö… Why commit a public felony in front of cameras?

    Besides, many, perhaps most, of the protestors came right out and said they’d be willing to go had the war been “just”. That’s pretty stupid if it’s the draft itself you’re protesting. It undercuts the whole point.

    Conscription laws in the US– and presumably elsewhere– don’t allow you to pick and choose your battles. That’s what enlistment is for.

  124. @AnotherDad
    @Jack D

    Oh boy, you're in fine minoritarian narrative spinning this morning there Jack. Whitey be racist oppressors. You should write for the NYT.

    --


    traitorous generals
     
    I'm a republican. I'm for a nation of free high wage/high productivity people governing themselves. I've got zero use for slavery, serfdom, nor the "must have immigration!" cheap labor shills--any of their sleazy ideologies or systems. That goes for the Confederacy.

    But these generals were following along with what their states had decided--to leave the Union. I think their system is vile and backward and secession was stupid, but they were loyal to the people in their states and communities who had voted in secession. And fighting a Union army seeking to overthrow that decision by invading their states.

    Compare to our "elite" of "must have immigration!" shills, intentionally selling out and trashing the future of the American people and their posterity. Those scum are actually disloyal and truly "traitorous" to the people and nation they owe loyalty to.

    --


    He really was murdered for racist reasons
     
    Till was not murdered randomly. He was murdered for putting his hands on another man's wife--or at least scaring the bejesus out of her so she went running to car for her gun. This sort of stuff has led to plenty of beatings and murders down through the ages. The he was black--and a apparently stubbornly unrepentant--along with the low character of Roy Bryant and his half brother were what juiced this to murder. And yes, the racial context of Jim Crow--not wanting to tell blacks that Till's behavior would be tolerated--was what got Bryant and Milam off.

    But this was hardly, like "these black guys have taken our jobs" or "we don't like these people and are going to run them out of town" murder. It was a husband's very personal beef with Till's crude behavior toward his wife.

    --


    and it’s not wrong to have a monument to him.

     

    Wow. The Asians are going to claim a whole bunch of these "racist reasons murder" national monuments. But I think I'll stick with my gal Kylie and drag the grandkids to The Channon Christian and Christopher Newsome Racist Murder National Monument (the CCCNRMNM). I look forward to the "Biden" administration announcing that.

    Replies: @Hypnotoad666, @Ed Case, @Pirate King of Arkansas

    Robert E. Lee was not a traitor to his country, because his country was Virginia.

    (If Jack D had a gun to his head and had to choose, I strongly suspect he’d choose his tribe over the Goverment of the United States on any day of the week.)

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    @Hypnotoad666

    At the time, Lee's love was for his state. Moreover, Lee wrote in September 1865 that the issues between the North and South had been decided and he believed “it to be the duty of every one to unite in the restoration of the country, and the reestablishment of peace & harmony.”

    "(If Jack D had a gun to his head and had to choose, I strongly suspect he’d choose his tribe over the Goverment of the United States on any day of the week.)"

    He would choose to remain with those Jewish-Americans who support the government of the United States.

    Replies: @kaganovitch

  125. @Art Deco
    @AceDeuce

    He was born in New Madrid, Mo, about 50 miles from Cape Girardeau.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @AceDeuce

    He was born in New Madrid, Mo, about 50 miles from Cape Girardeau.

    Site of the worst earthquake in US history, in 1811. Take that, Californians!

    I stopped by their town museum just weeks before the SF-Oakland Series, and had quakes on the mind. Damn, had I only placed a bet! Imagine the payout!

    By the way, the accent is on the “mad-“. Just as in Helsinki, it’s on the “hell-”

  126. Chinese show more opposition to human genetic engineering than Americans in one poll I saw. They also jailed one IVF guy for cloning a human being.

    I think California’s combo of very high incomes, lots of nerds who wait until they are 38-45 to plan for kids, and aspie transhumanism means we’ll take the lead.

    You’re giving me polls again. BGI kept sending me emails to sign up to give them my DNA. I assume they are actively working the issues over there. Could be wrong.

    But here Jewish “Science” has declared that “race doesn’t exist” and all those Waspy genetics and “discredited theory of eugenics” guys are a bunch of Nazis. Now maybe the Silly Valley folks will work around this retail–that could be, capitalist competition is powerful.

    But to matter a lot a society has to generally decide to do eugenics. That sounds more like something the Chicoms at least could do–though, of course, in fits and starts with lots of confusion and corruption. But a few Silly Valley dudes having his one or two genetically engineered super-kids, while the inner city thug knocks up three different women, Mexican momma pops out her three babies and Africans discover they can fly to Monterey and walk across the border to collect reparations …

    • Replies: @Pixo
    @AnotherDad

    I don’t know what you infer from BGI having an email listserv that begs for free data. The big advances in GWAS/IQ are still mostly among whites.

    Enhancement of IQ beyond what you’d expect from the parents turns out to be harder than we might have expected 15 years ago. I don’t think it will be common anywhere in the world even 20 years from now. But for the reason I stated it will be most common in CA.

    Race realist intellectuals on genetics and IQ topics are heavily Jewish. But you want to keep complaining about Gould, keep barking at the moon.

    https://twitter.com/UBERSOY1/status/1676458973174591489

    Replies: @res

  127. @anonymous
    You talk about blacks at least 10 times more than you talk about Jews. It's not helping guide us out of the mess the country is in.

    Replies: @Mike Tre, @J.Ross, @njguy73

    Blacks are 13 percent of the population, Jews are 2.4 percent. Makes sense to me.

  128. @anti_black_lib
    If Emmet Till hadn't sexually harassed that woman, none of this would have happened.;)

    Replies: @Mike Conrad

    Believe All Women …but only when they accuse white men.

  129. @Herbert R. Tarlek, Jr.
    @International Jew

    Why not a full-blown national park?

    That takes an act of Congress. However, many of our national parks did start out as national monuments, including the world-famous Grand Canyon.

    I think that, in the unlikely event that this country doesn't completely fall apart within the next couple of decades, you will definitely see Congress act on this pressing issue of giving the young master Till his proper honors.

    Replies: @Mike Conrad

    I think that, in the unlikely event that this country doesn’t completely fall apart within the next couple of decades, you will definitely see Congress act on this pressing issue of giving the young master Till his proper honors.

    Long before that, they’ll rain millions down upon his extended family. If St.George (pbuh) was worth $23 million, how much would Till be worth?

  130. @Art Deco
    @AceDeuce

    He was born in New Madrid, Mo, about 50 miles from Cape Girardeau.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @AceDeuce

    He may have been raised in New Madrid, Cliff Clavin, but he was born in Cape Girardeau.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @AceDeuce

    His draft card says 'Madrid'.
    ==
    There was a marriage license issued to Pomp Till and Clarissa Green, both of Leforge, Mo. The license was issued in New Madrid, Mo. on 1 January 1921. Louis Till was born on 22 February 1922. Pomp Till was shot to death in New Madrid on 19 June 1927. His wife had died some time earlier.

    Replies: @AceDeuce, @res

  131. @AnotherDad
    @Jack D


    And no your national separation is not happening. Stop fantasizing. Whiteland has as much chance of materializing as Wakanda.
     
    It's not "whiteland" but "America"--a nation for normal productive non-nutty Americans ... who are loyal to America. But otherwise, yeah. On this one, sadly, here you are most likely right.

    But it is still something to worth wishing for, working for--and if it comes to it--fighting for. Ordinary Americans deserve to have a nation of normal productive self-governing Americans who value the old sane stuff like "borders" and "rule of law" and are loyal to each other and "to ourselves our posterity".

    (And while the minoritarians don not deserve a nation ... to achieve separation, they need to get one. And I would be happy to see it ... just to enjoy the shit show! Parasites without a host. LOL.)


    But yeah, our likely future is "slumping toward Brazil". We'll have Holocaust Memorials and Emmett Till National Monuments and Stonewall Memorials and Lea Thomas Statues and kindergarten tranny story hour and "Reparations" as Africans swarm across our "nation of immigrants" memorial political boundary line ("border" being racist) ... while the Chinese do eugenic genetic engineering and engineer race targeted bioweapons.

    My grandkids will sure as hell wish they could live in my fantasy.

    Replies: @Pixo, @Legba, @Jim Don Bob, @Ennui

    My grandkids will sure as hell wish they could live in my fantasy.

    So do I.

  132. @Wilkey
    @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY)

    Martin Luther King Day (1983) and Juneteenth (2021).

    Incidentally, Memorial Day and Columbus Day only became federal holidays in 1968. That's still nearly a decade before I was born, but I never would have guessed they were that recent.

    Replies: @AnotherDad, @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY), @Ralph L, @RadicalCenter

    Thanks.

    • Replies: @Anon
    @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY)

    Pakistani accents aren't like Indian accents
    Pakistani accents sound like the foreign minister of Pakistan who addressed at the Canadian parliament about the situation in Palestine. Imran Khan, the prime minister of Pakistan has a Pakistani accent. It sounds very relaxed in the general sense. Also another fact is Pakistan doesn't have remotely as much English fluency as India. Pakistan adopted Urdu as the link language. India adopted English.

  133. @Pixo
    @Reg Cæsar

    Beep beep! Beep beep!

    https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/b/construction-worker-bulldozer-vector-cartoon-driver-kids-small-funny-cute-car-man-children-illustration-machinery-211571963.jpg

    Replies: @Corvinus

    Great to see that you relish the death of a young white woman. Fits your character to a T.

    • Replies: @Pixo
    @Corvinus

    She devoted her life to the Islamification of a foreign land. Not surprised you’re a fan. Be careful…

    https://thejewishvoice.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Parsha-Parshas-Pinchas-Baruch-article-1.jpg

    Replies: @Corvinus

  134. @Robertson
    A young Latino woman that was 21 years old was shot recently by a 15 year old black kid while sitting in the passenger seat of her car in a Nashville Apartment complex. It was an attempted carjacking. Her name was Genesis Garcia. She wanted to be a pharmacist.

    Are there going to be any statues built for Genesis Garcia?

    Jesus pointed out to the Pharisees how they'd pick a gnat out of their brother's eye and ignore a camel in their own eye. The Biggest Lies I've ever seen in my life over the years are actually truths, but they are over emphasized out of all reasonable proportion. A molehill literally made out to be a mountain.

    Joe Biden is damaging the Biden family name to the point that their descendants are going to be ashamed of it. John Allen Muhammad and Boyd Lee Malvo killed 10 innocent people as "The Beltway Snipers", but white people wisely do not want to build statues of the 10 victims to stir up racial resentment against black folks, but see that justice was done and move on together. I think most blacks probably don't think this monument is a good idea. The powers-that-be want that psyop narrative badly don't they? Tell me how that military recruiting is going again?

    Replies: @Colin Wright, @HallParvey

    ‘…I think most blacks probably don’t think this monument is a good idea…’

    I think that I don’t care what black people think.

    • Agree: Richard B
  135. @Hypnotoad666
    @AnotherDad

    Robert E. Lee was not a traitor to his country, because his country was Virginia.

    (If Jack D had a gun to his head and had to choose, I strongly suspect he'd choose his tribe over the Goverment of the United States on any day of the week.)

    Replies: @Corvinus

    At the time, Lee’s love was for his state. Moreover, Lee wrote in September 1865 that the issues between the North and South had been decided and he believed “it to be the duty of every one to unite in the restoration of the country, and the reestablishment of peace & harmony.”

    “(If Jack D had a gun to his head and had to choose, I strongly suspect he’d choose his tribe over the Goverment of the United States on any day of the week.)”

    He would choose to remain with those Jewish-Americans who support the government of the United States.

    • Replies: @kaganovitch
    @Corvinus


    He would choose to remain with those Jewish-Americans who support the government of the United States.
     
    I dunno Corvy. By your own account they're not a very trustworthy bunch. Turn your back to them and the next thing you know , dem Dolchstoss! https://www.unz.com/isteve/blacks-vs-hispanics-part-298/#comment-6017108

    Replies: @Corvinus

  136. @Wilkey
    @Jack D


    To the extent that Civil War generals were popular in the South, part of that was a massive, organized propaganda campaign that was quite successful in brainwashing people.
     
    The Confederate States of America was not the result of a military coup. Secession was decided by vote of the democratically-elected state legislatures in all eleven states that joined the CSA. Granted those legislatures weren't elected by blacks or women, but whaddaya whaddaya? Women didn't vote in the North, either. That was democracy of the time. Three states - Texas, Tennessee, and Virginia - even held referendums, which was not the usual way to decide such things back then.

    In other words, the generals leading the Confederate armies were not traitors. They were leading armies established by the duly elected leaders of their newly established country. Those generals didn't even invade the North. They weren't trying to destroy their old nation, but simply fighting to defend - defend - their new one.

    Nations don't survive forever. It is quite natural for nations to grow, shrink, change, break apart, and reform. Would you call responses to all those changes, by people who no longer feel their region/state/whatever belongs in their current country, "traitorous"? Were the voters in the UK who voted for Brexit traitors? Are Basques, Catalans or Scotsmen who want to leave their respective countries traitors?

    You might as well ban divorce. Why not just call any woman who wants to leave her abusive husband a traitorous, no-good bitch as well, yes?

    Again, I don't have much truck with the "Lost Cause." I don't have any love for slavery and think that, overall, it was better for the South that they remained in the Union. Were some of them brainwashed into supporting an institution that was not only bad for the slaves but for the rest of the South, as well? Sure, maybe. It was the economy they had at the time, and it was tough for them to imagine anything different.

    The South's economic struggles in the century following the end of slavery, and their eternal struggle to successfully integrate the descendants of those slaves, with their insanely high crime rates and overall low human capital, suggests the Southerners fearing the end of slavery were absolutely correct to do so.

    But the men who commanded the Southern armies weren't traitors, and Southerners have every right and reason to still hold their generals in some esteem. Our heroes aren't perfect. There is a lot of myth surrounding most of them, or maybe even all of them. But we need them. And to tell a people that they aren't allowed to have them, that they are evil for having them, is just - as I said before - obnoxiously stupid.

    Now maybe we can leave a pointless argument over statues and parks and schools and military bases alone and fight a political battle worth fighting, like the invasion currently happening across our southern border?

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    overall low human capital

    But, strangely, not low enough to remove altogether.

    suggests the Southerners fearing the end of slavery were absolutely correct to do so.

    Had the slaves been freed in Panama, as a certain railroad lawyer proposed, what would there have been to fear?

  137. @Herbert R. Tarlek, Jr.
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Good day for aim-y Mannlichers.

    "Microwave some more pizza rolls and bring 'em down to the basement, mom! Talkin' guns and gear with the guys on Unz is hungry work!"

    https://i.ibb.co/NV8dFpr/images.jpg

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Good day for aim-y Mannlichers.

    Talkin’ guns and gear with the guys on Unz is hungry work!

    Poor Oyb, probably didn’t get the pun. 🙁

    fat_guy.jpg

    Obviously, my comments aren’t that of a fat person. You, however, are tellingly food-obsessed:

    “Microwave some more pizza rolls and bring ’em down to the basement, mom!

    That’s some compelling original content, Oyb. Have you finally acquired gainful employment or are you still a self-described “starving peasant”? (The hunger is real!) Sounds like you want to move into your “mom’s basement” rather than live whatever melodrama is happening with you out in the desert:

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/a-compromise-between-affordable-housing-and-nimbyism/#comment-5909046 (#105, etc.)

    I merely think that private developers should be allowed to build housing on their own property that people like me can afford to rent so that I won’t be sleeping on a fucking park bench. It’s pretty clear that you are the Antoinette, here, and I the starving peasant. [e.a.]

    So which is it? Am I as rich as Marie Antoinette, or living in my “mom’s basement”? (Or… both??) You’re just a confused envious lefty, crying poormouth and fantasizing about left-wing revolution in the most cringe way possible:

    As a downscale white (or more likely, “fellow white” YIMBY?) who has really been hurt by the housing crisis, I think NIMBY homeowners need to be told to sit down and shut up. This country is headed for a second French Revolution [e.a.] if we don’t do something about this housing crisis soon.

    That attitude worked well for the Bourbons–until it didn’t.

    You will allow housing to be built for people like me or you will eventually face the guillotines.

    ‘Simple as.

    Enjoy your ill-gotten appreciation on your single-family home while you can, Marie Antoinette.

    LOL, who’s the tough-guy revolutionary now?

    Oyb: “DOWN WITH SINGLE-FAMILY ZONING! KILL HOMEOWNERS! RAWR!”

    This you?

    Twitter’s Woke Left Sans-Culotte LARPers

    • Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Correction: My blockquote of you ...


    As a downscale white (or more likely, “fellow white” YIMBY?) who has really been hurt by the housing crisis ...
     
    ... was meant to be split thus:

    As a downscale white
     
    Or more likely, "fellow white" YIMBY?

    who has really been hurt by the housing crisis ...
     
  138. @Corvinus
    @Pixo

    Great to see that you relish the death of a young white woman. Fits your character to a T.

    Replies: @Pixo

    She devoted her life to the Islamification of a foreign land. Not surprised you’re a fan. Be careful…

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    @Pixo

    She fought against the outright oppression of a group of people, according to the tenets of the Bible. You bitch and moan about being enslaved, so what is your excuse for not rising up yourself?

    Furthermore, I thought you were against Jews and their machinations. Now you're siding with them?

  139. @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Herbert R. Tarlek, Jr.



    Good day for aim-y Mannlichers.
     
    Talkin’ guns and gear with the guys on Unz is hungry work!
     
    Poor Oyb, probably didn’t get the pun. :(

    fat_guy.jpg
     
    Obviously, my comments aren’t that of a fat person. You, however, are tellingly food-obsessed:

    “Microwave some more pizza rolls and bring ’em down to the basement, mom!
     
    That’s some compelling original content, Oyb. Have you finally acquired gainful employment or are you still a self-described “starving peasant”? (The hunger is real!) Sounds like you want to move into your “mom’s basement” rather than live whatever melodrama is happening with you out in the desert:

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/a-compromise-between-affordable-housing-and-nimbyism/#comment-5909046 (#105, etc.)


    I merely think that private developers should be allowed to build housing on their own property that people like me can afford to rent so that I won’t be sleeping on a fucking park bench. It’s pretty clear that you are the Antoinette, here, and I the starving peasant. [e.a.]
     
    So which is it? Am I as rich as Marie Antoinette, or living in my “mom’s basement”? (Or… both??) You’re just a confused envious lefty, crying poormouth and fantasizing about left-wing revolution in the most cringe way possible:

    As a downscale white (or more likely, "fellow white" YIMBY?) who has really been hurt by the housing crisis, I think NIMBY homeowners need to be told to sit down and shut up. This country is headed for a second French Revolution [e.a.] if we don’t do something about this housing crisis soon.
     

    That attitude worked well for the Bourbons–until it didn’t.
     

    You will allow housing to be built for people like me or you will eventually face the guillotines.

    ‘Simple as.

    Enjoy your ill-gotten appreciation on your single-family home while you can, Marie Antoinette.
     

    LOL, who’s the tough-guy revolutionary now?

    Oyb: “DOWN WITH SINGLE-FAMILY ZONING! KILL HOMEOWNERS! RAWR!”

    This you?

    Twitter’s Woke Left Sans-Culotte LARPers


    https://tac.imgix.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/0c79890cf40e6947fea3701103dc1e62-1.jpg

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Correction: My blockquote of you …

    As a downscale white (or more likely, “fellow white” YIMBY?) who has really been hurt by the housing crisis …

    … was meant to be split thus:

    As a downscale white

    Or more likely, “fellow white” YIMBY?

    who has really been hurt by the housing crisis …

  140. @AceDeuce
    @Art Deco

    He may have been raised in New Madrid, Cliff Clavin, but he was born in Cape Girardeau.

    Replies: @Art Deco

    His draft card says ‘Madrid’.
    ==
    There was a marriage license issued to Pomp Till and Clarissa Green, both of Leforge, Mo. The license was issued in New Madrid, Mo. on 1 January 1921. Louis Till was born on 22 February 1922. Pomp Till was shot to death in New Madrid on 19 June 1927. His wife had died some time earlier.

    • Replies: @AceDeuce
    @Art Deco

    Wikipedia and one other account online reference Cape Girardeau as his birthplace.

    Replies: @Ralph L

    , @res
    @Art Deco


    His draft card says ‘Madrid’.
     
    Where do you see that? His 9 Jul 1942 enlistment record on FamilySearch just says MISSOURI with no image.
    https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:K8Y5-XSW

    Pomp Till's marriage certificate is available at
    https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QSQ-G989-36K6

    Both FamilySearch and FindaGrave give Louis Till's birth as 7 Feb 1922, but neither has a source. Do you?
    https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/9VQG-FDY
    https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/10967775/louis-till

    Pomp Till was shot to death in New Madrid on 19 June 1927. His wife had died some time earlier.
     
    Do you have sources for either of those?

    Any idea why Wikipedia claims he was born in Cape Girardeau? For reference, Cape Girardeau is about 50 miles away from New Madrid.

    This 2022 article has a number of sourced photos which I had not seen elsewhere.
    https://murderousroots.com/episodes/summersode-8-a-tragic-murder-in-mississippi

    P.S. Did you ever find the autopsy report putting "his height at 5’0″ and his weight at 118#" (referring to Emmett Till)?
    https://www.unz.com/isteve/emmett-tills-victim-dies-before-she-can-by-lynched/#comment-5940533

    Replies: @Art Deco

  141. A Chinese century is what the doctor ordered for all this civilizational sickness.

    • Replies: @Joe Stalin
    @Ennui


    A Chinese century is what the doctor ordered for all this civilizational sickness.
     
    No. Again. NO.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZZGPJjioII
  142. @Jack D
    @AnotherDad

    Not a chance. This is a one way ratchet - Dems put stuff like this in place and then GOP maintains it. The chances of a rollback are zero. Are you some kind of racist or sumthin?

    And no your national separation is not happening. Stop fantasizing. Whiteland has as much chance of materializing as Wakanda.

    Goodness knows that for 100 years there were monuments throughout the South for traitorous generals (some still stand) who did not deserve them. Those generals got a lot of Americans killed for an unjust cause (the right to own other human beings). A Martian would say that it's nuts that we put up statues of those guys. Who won the Civil War? Do they have statues of Nazis in Germany?

    Till did not live long enough to kill anyone. He really was murdered for racist reasons and it's not wrong to have a monument to him. Yes, his character and what he did was questionable but he did not deserve death.

    Replies: @bomag, @Reg Cæsar, @res, @Wilkey, @Art Deco, @Reg Cæsar, @AceDeuce, @pyrrhus, @Alden, @AnotherDad, @AnotherDad, @Hypnotoad666, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @James N. Kennett

    He really was murdered for racist reasons and it’s not wrong to have a monument to him.

    No, he was murdered for his threatening actions and alleged post hoc defiance. Whether or not “racist reasons” are wrong is a separate argument.

    Yes, his character and what he did was questionable but he did not deserve death.

    He certainly deserved death in a ‘Darwin awards’ sense: play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Emmett Till deserves zero sympathy. You may whine, ‘he was just a kid’, but do you think he would be any wiser at his dad’s age as when his father was dispatched? LOL

  143. @Pixo
    @AnotherDad

    “ while the Chinese do eugenic genetic engineering and engineer race targeted bioweapons.”

    Chinese show more opposition to human genetic engineering than Americans in one poll I saw. They also jailed one IVF guy for cloning a human being.

    I think California’s combo of very high incomes, lots of nerds who wait until they are 38-45 to plan for kids, and aspie transhumanism means we’ll take the lead.

    I find race targeted bioweapons implausible. What are they going to do, target wet earwax and chest hair?

    Replies: @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    East Asians have more scant facial/chest hair, but coarser/thicker, which can have dramatic effects:

    Japanese general 長岡 外史 Nagaoka Gaishi and some his Chinese acolytes

    • Thanks: Pixo
    • Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    I'unno, first guy looks sort of Ainu to me.

  144. @AnotherDad

    Chinese show more opposition to human genetic engineering than Americans in one poll I saw. They also jailed one IVF guy for cloning a human being.

    I think California’s combo of very high incomes, lots of nerds who wait until they are 38-45 to plan for kids, and aspie transhumanism means we’ll take the lead.
     

    You're giving me polls again. BGI kept sending me emails to sign up to give them my DNA. I assume they are actively working the issues over there. Could be wrong.

    But here Jewish "Science" has declared that "race doesn't exist" and all those Waspy genetics and "discredited theory of eugenics" guys are a bunch of Nazis. Now maybe the Silly Valley folks will work around this retail--that could be, capitalist competition is powerful.

    But to matter a lot a society has to generally decide to do eugenics. That sounds more like something the Chicoms at least could do--though, of course, in fits and starts with lots of confusion and corruption. But a few Silly Valley dudes having his one or two genetically engineered super-kids, while the inner city thug knocks up three different women, Mexican momma pops out her three babies and Africans discover they can fly to Monterey and walk across the border to collect reparations ...

    Replies: @Pixo

    I don’t know what you infer from BGI having an email listserv that begs for free data. The big advances in GWAS/IQ are still mostly among whites.

    Enhancement of IQ beyond what you’d expect from the parents turns out to be harder than we might have expected 15 years ago. I don’t think it will be common anywhere in the world even 20 years from now. But for the reason I stated it will be most common in CA.

    Race realist intellectuals on genetics and IQ topics are heavily Jewish. But you want to keep complaining about Gould, keep barking at the moon.

    • Replies: @res
    @Pixo


    Enhancement of IQ beyond what you’d expect from the parents turns out to be harder than we might have expected 15 years ago. I don’t think it will be common anywhere in the world even 20 years from now.
     
    How can you say that given the ability to select among multiple embryos? Gwern gives a comprehensive overview here.
    https://gwern.net/embryo-selection

    Thanks for that Twitter link. Emil's original blog post from June is quite interesting (and I had missed it).
    https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/2023/06/what-are-the-most-important-human-biodiversity-books/

    I think this plot of rating vs. "popularity" (# ratings) is informative. Perhaps worth giving the books above the regression line some extra attention?
    https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/number-of-ratings-vs.-mean-rating.png

    Also worth looking at the plot of the correlation (only 0.48 ; ) of survey ratings with Emil's ratings.

    Replies: @Pixo

  145. @Ralph L
    Speaking of unruly animals:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12327943/80-jump-surgery-dog-bites-30-000-treatment-year-nearly-3-500-having-reconstructive-operations.html

    Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic

    It’s pretty bizarre that wild animals are culled more ruthlessly for antagonism with humans than Canis lupus familiaris.

    • Agree: res
    • Replies: @Sollipsist
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    Not even close. At my shelter, one shelter in a country with more than 3500 shelters, we euthanize around a dozen dogs each day for exhibiting behavior that even just suggests aggression. And there are plenty of shelters quicker to make the call than we are, and less humane in their methods.

    Pretty sure that amounts to several orders of magnitude more than the number of wild animals killed for antagonism toward humans. The number of people who even got treated for animal bites last year was less than 50k, and half of those were by birds and rodents -- not generally targets for mass revenge killing.

    So I guess just be happy that the world is actually a tiny bit less bizarre than you think it is.

    Replies: @Colin Wright

    , @Jack D
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    It's not bizarre at all. Wild animals are expected to generally stay away from humans and densely populated area so if any are so aggressive as to actually attack humans except for the most compelling reasons (your are molesting their cubs) they are usually culled or at least moved from populated areas.

    Domestic dogs OTOH are by their nature (dogs did not exist before humans in effect created them) and by definition in daily and intimate contact with humans. These things literally live in our house in most cases. In some cases even in people's beds. We therefore tolerate (within limits) a certain amount of aggression from them.

    For example, if the fox that I sometimes see in my yard ran up to me and bit me, I would not tolerate having it in my yard (especially with unknown rabies status) and would see to it that it was removed immediately. OTOH, my late labradoodle, as gentle as she was (as gentle as a dog can be) would sometimes bare her teeth and growl (which was in itself amusing because she looked like a stuffed animal with big floppy ears) and even snap at you (without really seriously biting) if you tried to take some food item from her mouth or if you touched some sore spot on her body. But this was only because we were in much closer proximity to each other than any wild animal would ever be. I wouldn't dream of trying to take a bone from the mouth of a wolf.

  146. @Jack D
    @Art Deco

    This was not some random crime - a robbery gone wrong, a drunken bar brawl. The crime was only possible in the context of the Jim Crow system. His crime fundamentally was that he did not "know his place". The killing was not just personal to Till and his family but was part and parcel of a system designed to keep blacks in their place at the bottom of a racial hierarchy. His killers were not punished for their crime because of this hierarchy. So to pretend that this had nothing to do with anyone or anything else is just false.

    Replies: @Forbes, @Art Deco, @Colin Wright, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Anonymous Jew, @The Anti-Gnostic

    His crime fundamentally was that he did not “know his place”.

    Notably, as fundamentally expressed by being a demonstrable physical threat (and allegedly unrepentant under subsequent duress) to members of the community. Looks like his killers nipped that ongoing individual threat in the bud. You seem sad about that.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    And you seem quite unsad that Till received an extrajudicial death penalty for mouthing off.

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican

  147. @Ennui
    A Chinese century is what the doctor ordered for all this civilizational sickness.

    Replies: @Joe Stalin

    A Chinese century is what the doctor ordered for all this civilizational sickness.

    No. Again. NO.

  148. @Jack D
    @Art Deco

    This was not some random crime - a robbery gone wrong, a drunken bar brawl. The crime was only possible in the context of the Jim Crow system. His crime fundamentally was that he did not "know his place". The killing was not just personal to Till and his family but was part and parcel of a system designed to keep blacks in their place at the bottom of a racial hierarchy. His killers were not punished for their crime because of this hierarchy. So to pretend that this had nothing to do with anyone or anything else is just false.

    Replies: @Forbes, @Art Deco, @Colin Wright, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Anonymous Jew, @The Anti-Gnostic

    The crime was only possible in the context of the Jim Crow system. His crime fundamentally was that he did not “know his place”.

    What’s the total excess Black-on-White murders caused by integration? I would like to see a comparison of Black murderers % of White victims both before and after Jim Crow. Maybe Jim Crow wasn’t entirely good; but maybe it wasn’t entirely bad either.

    Southern Whites knew Blacks more intimately than, say, Northern Jews. Ideally, you want to treat people as individuals. But when the Bell Curves are too far apart that isn’t always pragmatic.

    • Thanks: bomag, Kylie
    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Anonymous Jew

    Murders of whites in S. Africa are also way up, but maintaining a system of minority rule by terror is unsustainable in the long run. Whites in the American South drew the wrong lesson after Haiti - they should have put their Africans back on a boat instead of doubling down on permanent rule by terror. Anything short of that was just kicking the can down the road .

    Replies: @Prester John, @Ennui, @Art Deco, @fredyetagain aka superhonky

    , @Corvinus
    @Anonymous Jew

    “Ideally, you want to treat people as individuals. But when the Bell Curves are too far apart that isn’t always pragmatic.”

    So you’re siding with science rather than the Torah. Kindness isn't optional in Judaism.

    Replies: @Ennui, @RadicalCenter

  149. Under oath to federal agents she admitted he penetrated her. They interviewed her twice.her story never changed.they had to let her go. Good luck finding the transcript.

  150. @rebel yell
    @Jack D

    In this and past posts you've repeatedly called Confederates traitors and compared them to Nazis and Stalinists. Others have pointed out that loyalty to your state, then or now, is not treasonous. And fighting for your right to self-government is not a bad cause. The real issue in 1860 was not slavery or tariffs, but whether white southerners or white northerners would decide those issues for the South. Nothing wrong with insisting on home rule.
    As for Nazis and Stalinists, I'll say again you can as easily accuse Jewish Israelis of Nazi behavior. Jewish Israelis kill Arabs to steal their land, no? Jews were terrorists, blowing up hotels, no? Robert E Lee never blew up a hotel full of civilians. Israelis who did that were later Prime Ministers.


    To the extent that Civil War generals were popular in the South, part of that was a massive, organized propaganda campaign that was quite successful in brainwashing people
     
    Another of your smears, that there is something phony about Confederate statues and memorials. Southern people revered their soldiers from day one. Your description of a propaganda campaign to create astroturf memorials more aptly describes Holocaust memorials in the US.
    In past posts you pointed to the fact that Confederate statues were not finally built until many years after the war as proof that the sentiments were fake. Does that same reasoning apply to Holocaust memorials built 70 years after WWII? Does that reasoning apply to memorials to Northern Generals that were built in the same era the Southern statues went up, or the Lincoln Memorial which was not built until 1922?

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Peter Akuleyev

    Robert E Lee never blew up a hotel full of civilians.

    Nor did William T Sherman.

    Israelis who did that were later Prime Ministers.

    I’m sure there were “hotels full of civilians” in Hamburg, Berlin, and Dresden, as well.

  151. @Jack D
    @Art Deco

    This was not some random crime - a robbery gone wrong, a drunken bar brawl. The crime was only possible in the context of the Jim Crow system. His crime fundamentally was that he did not "know his place". The killing was not just personal to Till and his family but was part and parcel of a system designed to keep blacks in their place at the bottom of a racial hierarchy. His killers were not punished for their crime because of this hierarchy. So to pretend that this had nothing to do with anyone or anything else is just false.

    Replies: @Forbes, @Art Deco, @Colin Wright, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Anonymous Jew, @The Anti-Gnostic

    Getting a beat-down or killing for not knowing your place wasn’t invented by early 20th century Southerners. You can be as blue-blooded and wealthy as a Rockefeller but you are still going to end up dead if you show your arrogant ass around the wrong part of town.

    There is a striking modern example: wealthy, influential, WASPy Bob Lee had his entrails handed to him when he ended up on the wrong side of California’s Kardashian-American honor culture. And I bet you Nima Momeni, defender of his family’s honor, gets sprung by a jury of his peers or gets a generous plea bargain.

    • Replies: @Pixo
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    “ California’s Kardashian-American honor culture”

    The killer was actually a Zoroastrian.

    Thus stabbed Zarathustra!

    , @Ed Case
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    It happened to a Rockefeller in Melbourne about 15 years ago.
    He turned up at some swappers house to do some wife swappin' minus his wife.
    Later found in pieces inside a 44 gallon drum in the water at Hastings.

    , @Jack D
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    Something tells me that even in Beverly Hills you don't get an all Persian jury. We'll see - I'm betting that Momeni is NOT going to walk and is looking at a really long sentence. He is being held without bail, which is not a good sign.

    , @Corvinus
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    “Getting a beat-down or killing for not knowing your place wasn’t invented by early 20th century Southerners”

    No, but it was practiced religiously there. Which ended up to be illegal and immoral.

    Replies: @Prester John

  152. OT: classic sailersphere stuff.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/07/wealthy-liberal-suburbs-economic-segregation-scarsdale/674792/

    “Watch what they do, not what they say.”

    Window signs are cheap. I laugh when I see the BLM signs in front of $2m homes in my neighborhood. A couple of miles away and you could be surrounded by all the black lives you wanted and your house would literally cost 1/10th of what it does in this neighborhood.

    Rich liberals are the worst people on earth.

  153. @The Anti-Gnostic
    @Jack D

    Getting a beat-down or killing for not knowing your place wasn't invented by early 20th century Southerners. You can be as blue-blooded and wealthy as a Rockefeller but you are still going to end up dead if you show your arrogant ass around the wrong part of town.

    There is a striking modern example: wealthy, influential, WASPy Bob Lee had his entrails handed to him when he ended up on the wrong side of California's Kardashian-American honor culture. And I bet you Nima Momeni, defender of his family's honor, gets sprung by a jury of his peers or gets a generous plea bargain.

    Replies: @Pixo, @Ed Case, @Jack D, @Corvinus

    “ California’s Kardashian-American honor culture”

    The killer was actually a Zoroastrian.

    Thus stabbed Zarathustra!

    • Thanks: Bill Jones
  154. Emmett Till? Never heard of him.

  155. @AnotherDad
    @Jack D


    And no your national separation is not happening. Stop fantasizing. Whiteland has as much chance of materializing as Wakanda.
     
    It's not "whiteland" but "America"--a nation for normal productive non-nutty Americans ... who are loyal to America. But otherwise, yeah. On this one, sadly, here you are most likely right.

    But it is still something to worth wishing for, working for--and if it comes to it--fighting for. Ordinary Americans deserve to have a nation of normal productive self-governing Americans who value the old sane stuff like "borders" and "rule of law" and are loyal to each other and "to ourselves our posterity".

    (And while the minoritarians don not deserve a nation ... to achieve separation, they need to get one. And I would be happy to see it ... just to enjoy the shit show! Parasites without a host. LOL.)


    But yeah, our likely future is "slumping toward Brazil". We'll have Holocaust Memorials and Emmett Till National Monuments and Stonewall Memorials and Lea Thomas Statues and kindergarten tranny story hour and "Reparations" as Africans swarm across our "nation of immigrants" memorial political boundary line ("border" being racist) ... while the Chinese do eugenic genetic engineering and engineer race targeted bioweapons.

    My grandkids will sure as hell wish they could live in my fantasy.

    Replies: @Pixo, @Legba, @Jim Don Bob, @Ennui

    • Thanks: res, Calvin Hobbes
    • Replies: @res
    @Jim Don Bob

    Excellent piece. Thanks!

  156. Biden will establish a national monument

    It’s funny to imagine Biden’s concern over the necessity of building ET monuments (he’s likely more concerned about his future Jello flavors and diaper change schedule). His gig now is essentially to read the prepared statements his handlers push to the teleprompters. What a way to end one’s life…

    We’re supposed to believe that grandpa Biden just can’t stop thinking about the need we have for more Till (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVsQLlk-T0s).

    • Replies: @Kylie
    @From Beer to Paternity

    "His[Poopy's] gig now is essentially to read the prepared statements his handlers push to the teleprompters. What a way to end one’s life…"

    It's an infinitely better end than he deserves. He's a thoroughly loathsome creature, quite aside from his slimy political career.

  157. @Jack D
    @AnotherDad

    Not a chance. This is a one way ratchet - Dems put stuff like this in place and then GOP maintains it. The chances of a rollback are zero. Are you some kind of racist or sumthin?

    And no your national separation is not happening. Stop fantasizing. Whiteland has as much chance of materializing as Wakanda.

    Goodness knows that for 100 years there were monuments throughout the South for traitorous generals (some still stand) who did not deserve them. Those generals got a lot of Americans killed for an unjust cause (the right to own other human beings). A Martian would say that it's nuts that we put up statues of those guys. Who won the Civil War? Do they have statues of Nazis in Germany?

    Till did not live long enough to kill anyone. He really was murdered for racist reasons and it's not wrong to have a monument to him. Yes, his character and what he did was questionable but he did not deserve death.

    Replies: @bomag, @Reg Cæsar, @res, @Wilkey, @Art Deco, @Reg Cæsar, @AceDeuce, @pyrrhus, @Alden, @AnotherDad, @AnotherDad, @Hypnotoad666, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @James N. Kennett

    Goodness knows that for 100 years there were monuments throughout the South for traitorous generals (some still stand) who did not deserve them.

    Southerners put up those statues in the early 20th Century, to remind people who was boss. The proposed statue of Emmett Till serves the same purpose.

    General Lee opposed statues because he believed they got in the way of reconciliation. He was correct.

    • Replies: @res
    @James N. Kennett


    General Lee opposed statues because he believed they got in the way of reconciliation. He was correct.
     
    Snopes actually has what reads to me like a reasonable piece on this. Much more there.
    https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/robert-e-lee-confederate-monuments/

    What's True
    On several occasions before he died, former Confederate General Robert E. Lee expressed opposition to proposals to erect Civil War monuments and memorials, including some devoted specifically to the Confederacy.

    What's Undetermined
    It's unclear whether, or to what degree, Lee's antipathy toward Confederate monuments was more pronounced than his antipathy toward building Civil War monuments in general.
     
    One thing I think should be emphasized more is that Lee offered a qualification. The usual quote follows (emphasis mine though).

    As regards the erection of such a monument as is contemplated,” Lee wrote of an 1866 proposal, “my conviction is, that however grateful it would be to the feelings of the South, the attempt in the present condition of the Country, would have the effect of retarding, instead of accelerating its accomplishment; [and] of continuing, if not adding to, the difficulties under which the Southern people labour.
     
    The full letter is here.
    http://leefamilyarchive.org/papers/letters/transcripts-UVA/v076.html

    I think the immediately following sentence also lessens the force of the quote above.

    All I think that can now be done, is to aid our noble & generous women in their efforts to protect the graves & mark the last resting places of those who have fallen, & wait for better times.
     
    , @AceDeuce
    @James N. Kennett


    Southerners put up those statues in the early 20th Century, to remind people who was boss. The proposed statue of Emmett Till serves the same purpose.

    General Lee opposed statues because he believed they got in the way of reconciliation. He was correct.
     

    Bullcrap about the Confederate statues. You're right about the negro molester Till statue.

    FYI: In "the early 20th Century", there were still thousands upon thousands of Union vets still alive, including a sizable number of wounded/maimed. Many of the vets were prominent in federal government. After Andrew Johnson and through McKinley, 30 years or so, Presidents were all Yankees and nearly every one was a Union Vet-several saw combat.

    There were thousands upon thousands of Northerners still mourning husbands, fathers, friends, brothers, and even sons.

    Evidently, those people, as well as the U.S. government, did not seriously try and prevent Southern states from putting up these monuments, made of marble and bronze--permanent ones.

    Those people, IMHO, had a say-so in the matter. They allowed it. Case closed. People like you and these other 2023 revisionist cucks can go whistle. Go drown yourself if you don't like them.

    Replies: @Jack D

  158. @Bill Jones
    Who says there's never any good news?


    Lockheed Martin believes global instability is driving demand and sees an increase in annual profits. Washington’s proxy war in Ukraine has caused an increase in arms spending among NATO members, boosting weapons makers’ stock prices.

    On Tuesday, Lockheed raised its annual profit and sales outlook on strong demand for military equipment.
     
    Who'da Thunk it?

    Replies: @Joe Stalin

    What’s on their mind?

  159. @Legba
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    Remember back when Madonna was fun, and not a pain in the ass?

    Not at all. I remember her as the talentless slut that she still is.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @The Germ Theory of Disease

    “I remember her [Madonna] as the talentless slut that she still is.”

    You have your terms confused.

    If you are chasing after everybody else, then you are a slut.

    But if everybody else is chasing after you, then you are a rock star.

    Since you seem to have never been either one of these, you are thus excused from the rest of this discussion.

    • Replies: @Legba
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    If you are chasing after everybody else, then you are a slut.

    But if everybody else is chasing after you, then you are a rock star.


    So which rock band is your mother in?

    , @vinnyvette
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    “I remember her [Madonna] as the talentless slut that she still is.”

    You have your terms confused.

    If you are chasing after everybody else, then you are a slut.

    But if everybody else is chasing after you, then you are a rock star.

    Since you seem to have never been either one of these, you are thus excused from the rest of this discussion.

    Wrong! A slut is a loose woman, has nothing to do with being the chaser or the chased.

    Madonna is, and always has been a talentless slut! She’s responsible for casting the die of future generations of talentless sluts like Lady Gaga and Katy Perry, and Miley Cirus. Who are all at least partly responsible for the “slut centric” society we now live in.

  160. @Hypnotoad666
    @Jack D


    A Martian would say that it’s nuts that we put up statues of those guys. Who won the Civil War? Do they have statues of Nazis in Germany?
     
    So your point is that blacks have won their civil war against white people, so it's only right they get their statues now? I guess that has internal logic from your point of view.

    George Washington was a traitorous general, but I guess it's only treason if you lose. For example, the traitorous Jews who rebelled against Rome in 69 A.D. I hope nobody is celebrating their treachery.

    Replies: @kaganovitch

    For example, the traitorous Jews who rebelled against Rome in 69 A.D. I hope nobody is celebrating their treachery.

    Traditionally, it was, indeed, not celebrated by Jews. The Talmud viewed it as an infamy forced on the population by the zealot party. It was only with the advent of modern Zionism and its valorization of martial virtues that the revolt was romanticised. In any case the Roman revolt was against an occupying force not a national divorce like the Civil War, so not entirely analogous. I do agree though that the North’s insistence on enforcing union was not legit.

  161. @Herbert R. Tarlek, Jr.
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Good day for aim-y Mannlichers.

    "Microwave some more pizza rolls and bring 'em down to the basement, mom! Talkin' guns and gear with the guys on Unz is hungry work!"

    https://i.ibb.co/NV8dFpr/images.jpg

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Jenner Ickham Errican

    For the edification of the iSteve community, a rundown on schizo left-wing ‘anarchist’ commenter “Herbert R. Tarlek, Jr.” (henceforth referred to as “Oyb”) who has recently decided to awkwardly project some of his, er, shortcomings onto yours truly. Examples from his first year of commenting (starting 2021) are below.

    [MORE]

    caption: OBSESSED WITH PREPARING FOR APOCALYPSE

    Oyb, who is (pretending to be?) triggered by my occasional gun/combat references, earlier agreed with another commenter’s “survivalist” take:

    https://www.unz.com/aanglin/qanon-shaman-sentenced-to-41-months-for-trespassing/#comment-5012372

    Get out of the cities. Find a hidey-hole in a red rural area. Stock up on dried goods and water. Become proficient with at least one firearm. Network with your new neighbors. Avoid government agents and snitches; you’ll know who they are because they’ll be the clowns pushing “violent insurrection.”

    OTOH, Oyb on civilians fighting the US government:

    https://www.unz.com/estriker/gay-activist-us-army-staff-sergeant-fantasizes-about-oppressing-right-wing-americans-in-viral-video/#comment-4870221

    Understand that if active duty military actually get deployed within the United States, you’ll be outnumbered by armed, pissed-off citizens about a thousand to one. You couldn’t hold Afghanistan, what makes you think you’re going to hold Arizona or Texas or Montana, you delusional, dyke-bitten bitch?

    Oyb going all ACAB about “pigs” like a leftist / anarchist / edgy “F.U. dad!” teen:

    https://www.unz.com/audio/jtaylor_already-a-record-year-for-police-ambushes/#comment-4845485

    Agreed. Antifa vermin just burned down half the country and the best we could hope for was that these pigs [e.a.] just stand there playing with themselves instead of arresting Antifa’s victims merely for defending themselves. They are, at best, useless.

    Any conservative/WN who still supports the police is so stupid he shouldn’t be let out of bed in the morning without a helmet on. This is not your country any longer and it’s police are not your police.

    https://www.unz.com/estriker/georgia-republican-attorney-general-indicts-prosecutor-for-not-charging-white-men-who-shot-black-criminal-in-self-defense-fast-enough/#comment-4882244

    One of then was a pig and no doubt would have obeyed orders to arrest Rittenhouse or steal the McCloskeys’ guns if he were the one who received those orders. He also would have arrested any of us on any trumped-up charge he was ordered to.

    This is another nig vs. pig conflict, a fight that we have no dog in. Screw these two. It’s time they were time they were devoured by the justice [sic] system and reaped what they’ve sown, just like Chauvin.

    Here, strangely, Oyb makes a lengthy deviation from his anti-“pig” hate in the example of the Black cop shooting and killing Ashley Babbit, of which he approves:

    https://www.unz.com/pbuchanan/who-and-what-is-tearing-the-us-apart/#comment-4902446 (#39, etc.)

    I have no great love of the current system, nor am I being hypocritical–I think lots and lots of antifa should have been shot dead by pigs over the last year–but I gotta agree here. The woman was a member of a mob that was trying to crawl through a window that another member of the mob had broken just moments before, headed toward the House chamber where congressmaggots were cowering under their chairs.

    Oyb back on his regular edgy anarchist anti-(White) cop hate:

    https://www.unz.com/jderbyshire/the-arbery-show-trial-begins-more-human-sacrifices-to-appease-the-blm-gods/?showcomments#comment-4968610

    McMichael being a retired pig, I got no dog in this fight. I hate, loathe and despise pigs every bit as much as niggers. They’re not our friends, and if you think they are, you’re so stupid you shouldn’t be let out of bed in the morning without a helmet on.

    Oyb thinks if he writes “niggers” he’ll fool us into thinking he’s right-wing and pro-White, but he likes it when Black cops shoot unarmed Whites. Interesting. A pattern emerges with his comments…

    Oyb with derivative anti-American edgelord takes:

    https://www.unz.com/aanglin/so-are-we-doing-this-war-with-china-or-what/?showcomments#comment-4920857

    The U.S. would get its ass kicked in a war with China, which is precisely why I support one.

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/americans-are-getting-lazier/#comment-5000732

    Until then, as far as I am concerned, it’s nothing but a form of ritual humiliation of the working class that Ameritards [e.a.] are stupid to put up with.

    Oyb hates White cops and “Ameritards” and homeowners, but (surprise!) thinks Jews unfairly get a bad rap:

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/is-systemic-racism-particularly-non-systemic/#comment-5141988

    Jews have been at the forefront of many things, both good and bad. One might argue, plausibly, that this is simply a function of thier higher intelligence.

    When they talk about Jews, white gentiles who are hard-core anti-semites sound a lot like Al Sharpton talking about white gentiles, only their arguments at least rise to the level of speciousness.

    I have never really been a true believer in anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.

    Oddly, in an exchange between Oyb, Corvinus, and an “anon”, Oyb takes theatrical umbrage at being identified as a Jew, even though no one had done so…

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/super-bowl-commercials/#comment-5177647 (#101)

    Corvinus says:

    “Whites are no longer prestigious but reviled.”

    It’s more that us whites see things in a new way by our own accord, much to your chagrin. Out with the old. It can be quite a shock to the system; thankfully, COVID has done wonders for taking your kind out to the woodshed.

    anon[122] says:

    It’s more that us whites

    “my fellow Whites…”

    Herbert R. Tarlek, Jr. says:

    Well isn’t this special. For the first time I’ve been misidentified as a Jew by the Jew-obsessed morons around here. [e.a.] I suppose it was bound to happen sooner or later. As any Unz thread approaches infinity, the possibility of some poster being falsely accused of being a Jew approaches 1. Call It Tarlek’s law.

    Heh. Oyb seems to have been expecting the “fellow white” suspicion from the start (and responded as if he is the accused Corvinus!). Hmmm.

    Based on all of the above, my guess is that Oyb is a Jew or mischling, instinctively hostile to White social and government power (single-family zoning, police authority, etc.) and is trying to ingratiate himself here by making basic-bitch noises about Blacks and antifa as cover to push an anti-White, anti-American agenda. Ladies and gentlemen, mock this snake at every turn from here on out.

  162. • Replies: @Wilkey
    @JohnnyWalker123


    The pandemic really is over — US death rate has returned to normal.
     
    Since COVID killed off hundreds of thousands of people mostly in their last few years of life, a true end to the pandemic would be death rates below normal, as there were people dying in 2020 who would otherwise have died in 2021-2023. There are people who aren't around to die at age 84 this year because they died of COVID at age 82.

    But death rates haven't gone below normal, which means people still dying of COVID and/or increases in other causes of death, like all of the new social ills we have to thank as a result of lockdowns, increased violence due to depolicing, or increased OD deaths thanks to all the drugs coming in across our unsecured border.

    Replies: @RadicalCenter

  163. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @Pixo

    East Asians have more scant facial/chest hair, but coarser/thicker, which can have dramatic effects:

    Japanese general 長岡 外史 Nagaoka Gaishi and some his Chinese acolytes

    https://i.postimg.cc/WbKGhfH4/906.jpg

    https://i.postimg.cc/g0b3KLdF/907.jpg

    https://i.postimg.cc/ry9cVBzS/905.jpg

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease

    I’unno, first guy looks sort of Ainu to me.

  164. @Corvinus
    @Hypnotoad666

    At the time, Lee's love was for his state. Moreover, Lee wrote in September 1865 that the issues between the North and South had been decided and he believed “it to be the duty of every one to unite in the restoration of the country, and the reestablishment of peace & harmony.”

    "(If Jack D had a gun to his head and had to choose, I strongly suspect he’d choose his tribe over the Goverment of the United States on any day of the week.)"

    He would choose to remain with those Jewish-Americans who support the government of the United States.

    Replies: @kaganovitch

    He would choose to remain with those Jewish-Americans who support the government of the United States.

    I dunno Corvy. By your own account they’re not a very trustworthy bunch. Turn your back to them and the next thing you know , dem Dolchstoss! https://www.unz.com/isteve/blacks-vs-hispanics-part-298/#comment-6017108

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    @kaganovitch

    The group of white people you associate yourself with are far more untrustworthy than Jack's kind. That's not even debatable.

  165. Will there be exhibits replicating the standard HR sexual harassment sideshows, with mandatory quizzes that you must pass to exit the monument?

    Will the exhibits train you to bring up incidents of flirtatiousness, harassment, or groping to the sexual-harassment-contact-person in your department, rather than trying to handle it on your own with baseball bats, castration, or lynching?

    The coalition wants to know.

  166. @The Germ Theory of Disease
    Sorry to go all off the ranch OT but i just think everybody could use a bit of cheering up from the old days......


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIcb7MnCkLs


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3ov9USxVxY

    Remember back when Madonna was fun, and not a pain in the ass?


    Part of the reason I'm putting this here is, even though I share a more bizarre spiritual kinship with La PJ, physically I grew up in the same place and time as Madonna, and i remember just how horrible everything was; so she found a way to do something kooky and pleasant and happy with all of that non-stop monstrosity, and so because she figured that out, and also made a freaking fortune out of doing it, what can I say? except, I dips me lid.

    Sorry everything else later got a bit too ka-razy, but ya gotta admit, at least the 80s were fun. And I can certainly tell you that your 1980s were a LOT more fun than my 1980s.

    Replies: @Pat Hannagan, @Legba, @Joe Stalin, @Richard B, @RadicalCenter

    Remember back when Madonna was fun, and not a pain in the ass?

    Ah…Nope! Missed that one.

    But I did get a kick out of the fact that her songwriting partner was a big Gentle Giant fan. Didn’t see that one coming. He’s got good taste. Those guys knew what they were doing.

    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    @Richard B

    And I never realised that Gentle Giant were Simon Dupree and the Big Sound.

    (who was the songwriting partner?)

  167. This is how a serious country functions.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @JohnnyWalker123


    This is how a serious country functions.
     
    I don't get it. A serious country functions by publishing stories from 6 years ago? A serious country functions by banning free speech? A serious country functions by outlawing LGBT content and then backing off when people object?

    I understand that there is a wish or a desire to hold up some other place (Russia, China) as places that are STRONK and not shit shows like America but those mythical STRONK places don't really exist - they've got their own problems.
  168. Wasnt Saint Emmett lynched for getting fresh with an extremely well endowed white chick? Can we get a sculpture of her too 😈😈😈👺

  169. @Anonymous
    @Jack D

    Hitler enjoyed massive overwhelming support nearly unto his death. In stark contrast to Roosevelt who was despised by maybe half the Us population and Churchill who was voted out of office within weeks of the allied victory in Europe.

    Replies: @Ralph L

    For obvious reasons, Eleanor was widely hated by white Southerners who voted automatically for her husband. I found a pamphlet about her in my great aunt’s stuff. Kinda wish I’d saved it.

  170. @Wilkey
    @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY)

    Martin Luther King Day (1983) and Juneteenth (2021).

    Incidentally, Memorial Day and Columbus Day only became federal holidays in 1968. That's still nearly a decade before I was born, but I never would have guessed they were that recent.

    Replies: @AnotherDad, @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY), @Ralph L, @RadicalCenter

    Some states were still officially celebrating Confederate Memorial Day, usually around April 26. Civil rights and the centennial caused renewed interest, which may have led the Feds to make theirs official.

  171. @rebel yell
    @Jack D

    In this and past posts you've repeatedly called Confederates traitors and compared them to Nazis and Stalinists. Others have pointed out that loyalty to your state, then or now, is not treasonous. And fighting for your right to self-government is not a bad cause. The real issue in 1860 was not slavery or tariffs, but whether white southerners or white northerners would decide those issues for the South. Nothing wrong with insisting on home rule.
    As for Nazis and Stalinists, I'll say again you can as easily accuse Jewish Israelis of Nazi behavior. Jewish Israelis kill Arabs to steal their land, no? Jews were terrorists, blowing up hotels, no? Robert E Lee never blew up a hotel full of civilians. Israelis who did that were later Prime Ministers.


    To the extent that Civil War generals were popular in the South, part of that was a massive, organized propaganda campaign that was quite successful in brainwashing people
     
    Another of your smears, that there is something phony about Confederate statues and memorials. Southern people revered their soldiers from day one. Your description of a propaganda campaign to create astroturf memorials more aptly describes Holocaust memorials in the US.
    In past posts you pointed to the fact that Confederate statues were not finally built until many years after the war as proof that the sentiments were fake. Does that same reasoning apply to Holocaust memorials built 70 years after WWII? Does that reasoning apply to memorials to Northern Generals that were built in the same era the Southern statues went up, or the Lincoln Memorial which was not built until 1922?

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Peter Akuleyev

    Fair enough that the Confederate Generals were not “traitors”. Nonetheless they were mostly a contemptible group of elites who dragged hundreds of thousands of young Southern white men to their deaths in a war to protect the property rights of a small minority (and not just any property rights, we are talking about the right to import and breed Africans in the US, a property right that has done tremendous long term damage to the US). Anyone who waves a Confederate flag has no right to complain about elites trying to replace white
    people. That was the core value of the CSA.

    • Disagree: Colin Wright
    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @Peter Akuleyev

    Importation of slaves was banned in 1808.
    ==
    There was some conscription during the Civil War, but the vast bulk of those on both sides served voluntarily.
    ==
    The states which held referenda had 3-1 majorities in favor of secession. In some state conventions, the opposition was considerable. In others, votes in favor of secession passed by 6, 8, 0r 10-1 margins.

    , @Colin Wright
    @Peter Akuleyev

    '...we are talking about the right to import and breed Africans in the US, a property right that has done tremendous long term damage to the US).'

    You're aware the importation of slaves into the US had been banned for more than fifty years when the Civil War broke out?

  172. @Che Blutarsky
    I wonder if his mom ever thought, before leaving Chicago, if I just take this pain in the ass kid to Mississippi maybe the locals will take care of him.

    Or maybe not, but it seems like she knew taking him down there was a bad idea and she did it anyway.

    Replies: @Anon, @Ebony Obelisk, @Alden

    You are an awful human being

    You should be ashamed if yourself

    People like you are why we cannot have nice things

    One good thing is that demogdarogx Cheney is hapienyhand wgiyres will soon be a minutely

    • Replies: @fredyetagain aka superhonky
    @Ebony Obelisk


    One good thing is that demogdarogx Cheney is hapienyhand wgiyres will soon be a minutely
     
    I think that's the most intelligent thing you've ever written on this site. Congrats.
  173. @Mike Tre
    @anonymous

    The MSM has their narrative, and Steve has his.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease

    Well, as David Mamet once famously said at his Loeb lecture, when confronted by an audience member with a little-bit-too-sticky of a question…

    “Hey, you work your side of the street, lady, and I’ll work mine.”

    Didn’t answer or solve the problem, but on the other hand it did get a good laugh, and sometimes that turns out to be the best solution.

    I was always sort of a teensy bit steamed at Brustein that he never invited Elizabeth LeComte or Ron Vawter to come say a few baffling things. He seemed oblivious to the giant influence that the Wooster Group was having on the rest of us, much more so than Mamet or Sam Shepard.

  174. @Art Deco
    @AceDeuce

    His draft card says 'Madrid'.
    ==
    There was a marriage license issued to Pomp Till and Clarissa Green, both of Leforge, Mo. The license was issued in New Madrid, Mo. on 1 January 1921. Louis Till was born on 22 February 1922. Pomp Till was shot to death in New Madrid on 19 June 1927. His wife had died some time earlier.

    Replies: @AceDeuce, @res

    Wikipedia and one other account online reference Cape Girardeau as his birthplace.

    • Replies: @Ralph L
    @AceDeuce

    When I was waiting to get my first NC driver's license, the trooper had to verify the date of birth of an old black guy who never had a birth certificate or other documentation of it. There's a good chance there's no official record of Till until (!) a Census.

    Replies: @AceDeuce, @Reg Cæsar

  175. @AnotherDad
    @Jack D

    Oh boy, you're in fine minoritarian narrative spinning this morning there Jack. Whitey be racist oppressors. You should write for the NYT.

    --


    traitorous generals
     
    I'm a republican. I'm for a nation of free high wage/high productivity people governing themselves. I've got zero use for slavery, serfdom, nor the "must have immigration!" cheap labor shills--any of their sleazy ideologies or systems. That goes for the Confederacy.

    But these generals were following along with what their states had decided--to leave the Union. I think their system is vile and backward and secession was stupid, but they were loyal to the people in their states and communities who had voted in secession. And fighting a Union army seeking to overthrow that decision by invading their states.

    Compare to our "elite" of "must have immigration!" shills, intentionally selling out and trashing the future of the American people and their posterity. Those scum are actually disloyal and truly "traitorous" to the people and nation they owe loyalty to.

    --


    He really was murdered for racist reasons
     
    Till was not murdered randomly. He was murdered for putting his hands on another man's wife--or at least scaring the bejesus out of her so she went running to car for her gun. This sort of stuff has led to plenty of beatings and murders down through the ages. The he was black--and a apparently stubbornly unrepentant--along with the low character of Roy Bryant and his half brother were what juiced this to murder. And yes, the racial context of Jim Crow--not wanting to tell blacks that Till's behavior would be tolerated--was what got Bryant and Milam off.

    But this was hardly, like "these black guys have taken our jobs" or "we don't like these people and are going to run them out of town" murder. It was a husband's very personal beef with Till's crude behavior toward his wife.

    --


    and it’s not wrong to have a monument to him.

     

    Wow. The Asians are going to claim a whole bunch of these "racist reasons murder" national monuments. But I think I'll stick with my gal Kylie and drag the grandkids to The Channon Christian and Christopher Newsome Racist Murder National Monument (the CCCNRMNM). I look forward to the "Biden" administration announcing that.

    Replies: @Hypnotoad666, @Ed Case, @Pirate King of Arkansas

    And yes, the racial context of Jim Crow–not wanting to tell blacks that Till’s behavior would be tolerated–was what got Bryant and Milam off.

    That’s not right at all.
    2 of Milam’s Black contractors did the beating, by the time Till’s eye was hanging out, the decision was made that it was too late to let him go, and one of the Blacks put a bullet in his brain.

    Once Till’s body was found, local Law Enforcement took the 2 to Alabama and locked them up there under false names until the Trial had concluded.
    Had investigators found them, they woulda been States Witnesses and, being eyewitnesses, Bryant and Milam woulda been Executed.

  176. @AceDeuce
    @Art Deco

    Wikipedia and one other account online reference Cape Girardeau as his birthplace.

    Replies: @Ralph L

    When I was waiting to get my first NC driver’s license, the trooper had to verify the date of birth of an old black guy who never had a birth certificate or other documentation of it. There’s a good chance there’s no official record of Till until (!) a Census.

    • Replies: @AceDeuce
    @Ralph L

    I don't trust negroes saying that stuff. Often a scam. I have a friend who used to work in Social Security. She told me that guys who were claiming to be 40 years old in 2010 (so, claiming to be born in 1970) in NYC or Philly would tell her that the birth state didn't issue blacks BCs back then (1960s/70s) because "racism".

    , @Reg Cæsar
    @Ralph L

    Rand Corp. devised the Soundex system to help the Census and the nascent Social Security system collate various spellings of different surnames. It may be still in use on your driver's license, depending on the state. ("Sailer" is S-460, "Cæsar" C-260, "Deco" D-200.)


    The government decided to start with the states in the South because their records were particularly bad, or so they said.

    Census Bureau page on Soundex

    Still... Missouri, in 1922? Come on... They had pencils by then.

  177. @The Anti-Gnostic
    @Jack D

    Getting a beat-down or killing for not knowing your place wasn't invented by early 20th century Southerners. You can be as blue-blooded and wealthy as a Rockefeller but you are still going to end up dead if you show your arrogant ass around the wrong part of town.

    There is a striking modern example: wealthy, influential, WASPy Bob Lee had his entrails handed to him when he ended up on the wrong side of California's Kardashian-American honor culture. And I bet you Nima Momeni, defender of his family's honor, gets sprung by a jury of his peers or gets a generous plea bargain.

    Replies: @Pixo, @Ed Case, @Jack D, @Corvinus

    It happened to a Rockefeller in Melbourne about 15 years ago.
    He turned up at some swappers house to do some wife swappin’ minus his wife.
    Later found in pieces inside a 44 gallon drum in the water at Hastings.

  178. Anon[304] • Disclaimer says:

    After all the hilarity here about Emmett Till over the years, I was thrown for a bit of a loop a couple of months ago when I read David Halberstam’s The Fifties and discovered that the Till thing was a really, really big deal at the time, in the way that could only happen when the media universe was three television news shows and a half a dozen news and public affairs magazines, and the entire population consumed that media. So in a way the current Till-mania is making up for the Till blackout during my 1960s-70s education.

    • Replies: @Cagey Beast
    @Anon

    People badmouth Boomers too much online but it has to be said that the current political culture is built upon the life experiences and worldview of the ideal Boomer. So the Emmett Till controversy takes on the importance of the fall of the Roman Empire, even for those born decades after he was killed.

    , @res
    @Anon

    How true is that? There were definitely some high profile articles (e.g. Look), but Emmett Till does not show up on Google Books Ngram Viewer until 1965. Increases steadily until the late 70s then muddles along at that level until 2003 when the recent ascent begins.
    https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=emmett+till&year_start=1950&year_end=2019&corpus=en-2019&smoothing=3

    This 1987 paper would be helpful, but I don't see full text. The abstract seems in agreement with Halberstam.
    Racial Coverage of the 1950s Print Media and the Case of Emmett Till.
    https://eric.ed.gov/?q=kidnapping&pg=4&id=ED283167


    The Emmett Till murder case in 1955 marked the turning point in the coverage of blacks by the white American press. Till, a black teenager from Chicago, was murdered in 1955 while visiting relatives in Mississippi. The Till murder was covered extensively in the press, since the two white men charged with killing him were acquitted by an all-white, all-male jury on murder charges and later that year were found innocent by a 20-man all-white grand jury on kidnapping charges. At first, most Southern papers denounced Till's murder, but as the Northern white and black presses began investigating the case, anti-black backlash erupted in Southern publications. Vehement criticism of the South came from "The Crisis," published by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), and other black publications followed suit. Editorials appearing in "Life" magazine and the "New York Times" were extremely wounding to Southern pride, and the Southern press retaliated. This media "civil war" continued for about a year after the Till case, raising the question of how to handle race-related news in the news media. By 1960, observers and the press itself agreed that coverage of blacks had improved in both the Northern and Southern press. The Till case gave America a harsh, inescapable glimpse of racial violence and injustice. Even so, problems in the press coverage of minority groups persist, and the task begun more than 30 years ago remains to be completed. (Sixty-three references are included.)
     
    David Halberstam’s The Fifties came out in 1994. Only two of the thousand Amazon reviews mention Emmett Till. The book is available on Libgen if anyone wants to see the Till bits. One thing I had not realized is Till was murdered just a few weeks after Lamar Smith. The latter's case seems much more outrage worthy to me. (and a few weeks before that was the unexplained murder of the Rev. George Lee)

    A few weeks later in Brookhaven, a black man named Lamar Smith was shot down in cold blood in the middle of the day in front of the county courthouse. Smith was a registered voter who had just voted in the state’s primary election, and he had encouraged others to vote as well. A white farmer was arrested but not indicted. Again the national press did not cover the story. The traditional covenants of Mississippi seemed more powerful than the new law of the land. This was what Mississippi white men had always done, and therefore it was not news. Blacks in Mississippi seemed not only outside the legal protection of the police, but also outside the moral protection of the press.

     

    FWIW here is Wikipedia's take.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamar_Smith_(activist)
    If anyone knows more/different please post.

    It is fascinating how the black community always seems to pick the least worthy "victims" to lionize. (scare quotes to indicate there is a wide range of what constitutes victim, some much less valid than others)

    Replies: @Jack D

  179. @Pixo
    @Corvinus

    She devoted her life to the Islamification of a foreign land. Not surprised you’re a fan. Be careful…

    https://thejewishvoice.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Parsha-Parshas-Pinchas-Baruch-article-1.jpg

    Replies: @Corvinus

    She fought against the outright oppression of a group of people, according to the tenets of the Bible. You bitch and moan about being enslaved, so what is your excuse for not rising up yourself?

    Furthermore, I thought you were against Jews and their machinations. Now you’re siding with them?

    • LOL: Pixo
  180. @kaganovitch
    @Corvinus


    He would choose to remain with those Jewish-Americans who support the government of the United States.
     
    I dunno Corvy. By your own account they're not a very trustworthy bunch. Turn your back to them and the next thing you know , dem Dolchstoss! https://www.unz.com/isteve/blacks-vs-hispanics-part-298/#comment-6017108

    Replies: @Corvinus

    The group of white people you associate yourself with are far more untrustworthy than Jack’s kind. That’s not even debatable.

  181. @Richard B
    @The Germ Theory of Disease


    Remember back when Madonna was fun, and not a pain in the ass?
     
    Ah...Nope! Missed that one.

    But I did get a kick out of the fact that her songwriting partner was a big Gentle Giant fan. Didn't see that one coming. He's got good taste. Those guys knew what they were doing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HR5A385gWdE

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon

    And I never realised that Gentle Giant were Simon Dupree and the Big Sound.

    (who was the songwriting partner?)

  182. @Peter Akuleyev
    @rebel yell

    Fair enough that the Confederate Generals were not “traitors”. Nonetheless they were mostly a contemptible group of elites who dragged hundreds of thousands of young Southern white men to their deaths in a war to protect the property rights of a small minority (and not just any property rights, we are talking about the right to import and breed Africans in the US, a property right that has done tremendous long term damage to the US). Anyone who waves a Confederate flag has no right to complain about elites trying to replace white
    people. That was the core value of the CSA.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @Colin Wright

    Importation of slaves was banned in 1808.
    ==
    There was some conscription during the Civil War, but the vast bulk of those on both sides served voluntarily.
    ==
    The states which held referenda had 3-1 majorities in favor of secession. In some state conventions, the opposition was considerable. In others, votes in favor of secession passed by 6, 8, 0r 10-1 margins.

  183. @The Anti-Gnostic
    @Jack D

    Getting a beat-down or killing for not knowing your place wasn't invented by early 20th century Southerners. You can be as blue-blooded and wealthy as a Rockefeller but you are still going to end up dead if you show your arrogant ass around the wrong part of town.

    There is a striking modern example: wealthy, influential, WASPy Bob Lee had his entrails handed to him when he ended up on the wrong side of California's Kardashian-American honor culture. And I bet you Nima Momeni, defender of his family's honor, gets sprung by a jury of his peers or gets a generous plea bargain.

    Replies: @Pixo, @Ed Case, @Jack D, @Corvinus

    Something tells me that even in Beverly Hills you don’t get an all Persian jury. We’ll see – I’m betting that Momeni is NOT going to walk and is looking at a really long sentence. He is being held without bail, which is not a good sign.

  184. @Anonymous Jew
    @Jack D


    The crime was only possible in the context of the Jim Crow system. His crime fundamentally was that he did not “know his place”.
     
    What’s the total excess Black-on-White murders caused by integration? I would like to see a comparison of Black murderers % of White victims both before and after Jim Crow. Maybe Jim Crow wasn’t entirely good; but maybe it wasn’t entirely bad either.

    Southern Whites knew Blacks more intimately than, say, Northern Jews. Ideally, you want to treat people as individuals. But when the Bell Curves are too far apart that isn’t always pragmatic.

    Replies: @Jack D, @Corvinus

    Murders of whites in S. Africa are also way up, but maintaining a system of minority rule by terror is unsustainable in the long run. Whites in the American South drew the wrong lesson after Haiti – they should have put their Africans back on a boat instead of doubling down on permanent rule by terror. Anything short of that was just kicking the can down the road .

    • Replies: @Prester John
    @Jack D

    They should never have been brought over in the first place, but that's another story. It's all, er, very "complex" you know.

    , @Ennui
    @Jack D

    More complicated than that. Haitian rebellion was initially led by mixed race colonials angry that they didn't get the respect that white French bureaucrats from the metropole got. Many were educated in France, and came from older families even if their mothers were of African descent.

    Once rebellion started, the actual black field hands joined in, to the chagrin of the coloured elites. Said colored elites sowed the whirlwind. The French were "distracted" by events at home. Sans the Revolutionary era, the French could have cracked down on the slaves. Malaria also didn't help.

    Something very similar happened with disgruntled criollos like Simon Bolivar in Latin America. They were descendants of conquistadors but were treated like second class citizens by poor peninsulare bureaucrats.

    In South America, the irony is the slaves and lower classes allied with the Spanish Royal forces against the criollo middle class. The lower class, mixed llaneros from what is now Venezuela allied with the Spanish royals and engaged in a reign of terror against the revolutionary-inclined criollos.

    You can terrorize and kill your way into complete control. Just ask Spartacus and his guys how successfully they ended Roman slavery and latifundia.

    , @Art Deco
    @Jack D

    South African blacks weren't ruled by terror. There was an intricate web of laws and regulations enforced by police officers and civilian inspectors and a regular court system. You did have rioting subject to quite bloody suppression (1960, 1976). The real terror came from rampant street crime (see how the subject is treated in Alan Paton's Cry, the Beloved Country). After 1982, there was a generalized breakdown in public order from political gang violence. The police weren't causing that.
    ==
    If there's a woulda coulda shoulda period in South African history it would be the years running from 1902 to 1910.

    Replies: @J.Ross

    , @fredyetagain aka superhonky
    @Jack D


    Whites in the American South drew the wrong lesson after Haiti – they should have put their Africans back on a boat instead of doubling down on permanent rule by terror. Anything short of that was just kicking the can down the road.
     
    Jack, you've written a lot of truly monumentally stupid things here regarding this emmett till issue, but except for your "rule by terror" histrionics, you've actually made a good point above. Too bad the boat solution you mentioned was never implemented; it would have saved a lot of innocent White suffering at the hands of feral, sadistic blacks.
    Oh and btw, both till and your co-ethnic leo frank got exactly what they deserved.

    Replies: @Jack D, @Art Deco

  185. @Anonymous Jew
    @Jack D


    The crime was only possible in the context of the Jim Crow system. His crime fundamentally was that he did not “know his place”.
     
    What’s the total excess Black-on-White murders caused by integration? I would like to see a comparison of Black murderers % of White victims both before and after Jim Crow. Maybe Jim Crow wasn’t entirely good; but maybe it wasn’t entirely bad either.

    Southern Whites knew Blacks more intimately than, say, Northern Jews. Ideally, you want to treat people as individuals. But when the Bell Curves are too far apart that isn’t always pragmatic.

    Replies: @Jack D, @Corvinus

    “Ideally, you want to treat people as individuals. But when the Bell Curves are too far apart that isn’t always pragmatic.”

    So you’re siding with science rather than the Torah. Kindness isn’t optional in Judaism.

    • Replies: @Ennui
    @Corvinus

    Ah yes, Corvinus, the Torah is noted for its kind, forgiving code.

    Perhaps you meant the Talmud or some of the later writings of Jewish thought leaders?

    , @RadicalCenter
    @Corvinus

    As you well know, the “Old Testament” is chock full of vicious unnecessary cruelty allegedly perpetrated by God, or by the “chosen people” with the approval or command of God. Tells us all we need to know about anyone, Jewish or Christian or Muslim, who believes in those “holy books” as the “word of God.”

    It’s quick and easy to read the “OT” and verify this. Sane non-psychopathic people have no obligation to accord respect to maniacs who say they believe in the OT / “the torah.”

    Shame on you and the rest of your ilk from all three abrahamic “religions” who refuse to condemn and reject the old testament’s vile celebration of sadism, murder and torture.

    Justify these, you sick bastard, and tell us again about “kindness” in Judaism and the Judaism-descended/influenced “religions”:

    https://skepticsannotatedbible.com/dwb/TOC.html

    There are many millions of good hearted, fairminded, kind, peaceful people calling themselves Christians, jews and Muslims — but only because they do not conduct themselves ANYthing like the “God” or ”his chosen people” portrayed and lionized in the OT. Why not come out and explicitly reject the whole vile mess already?

    Replies: @Corvinus

  186. @The Anti-Gnostic
    @Jack D

    Getting a beat-down or killing for not knowing your place wasn't invented by early 20th century Southerners. You can be as blue-blooded and wealthy as a Rockefeller but you are still going to end up dead if you show your arrogant ass around the wrong part of town.

    There is a striking modern example: wealthy, influential, WASPy Bob Lee had his entrails handed to him when he ended up on the wrong side of California's Kardashian-American honor culture. And I bet you Nima Momeni, defender of his family's honor, gets sprung by a jury of his peers or gets a generous plea bargain.

    Replies: @Pixo, @Ed Case, @Jack D, @Corvinus

    “Getting a beat-down or killing for not knowing your place wasn’t invented by early 20th century Southerners”

    No, but it was practiced religiously there. Which ended up to be illegal and immoral.

    • Replies: @Prester John
    @Corvinus

    It ended up illegal.

    It was always immoral.

  187. @Colin Wright
    @Jack D


    'This was not some random crime – a robbery gone wrong, a drunken bar brawl. The crime was only possible in the context of the Jim Crow system. His crime fundamentally was that he did not “know his place”. The killing was not just personal to Till and his family but was part and parcel of a system designed to keep blacks in their place at the bottom of a racial hierarchy. His killers were not punished for their crime because of this hierarchy. So to pretend that this had nothing to do with anyone or anything else is just false.'
     
    One wonders how you would handle living and working in a majority black area. How, for example, would you go about making sure your young wife could mind the store by herself?

    Emmitt Till's murder was definitely a beating that went sideways. But I can see how it happened. Read the Look Magazine article.

    Replies: @Corvinus, @nonentity

    “Emmitt Till’s murder was definitely a beating that went sideways”

    JFC, the beating never should have taken place at all!

    • Disagree: Colin Wright
  188. @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Jack D


    His crime fundamentally was that he did not “know his place”.
     
    Notably, as fundamentally expressed by being a demonstrable physical threat (and allegedly unrepentant under subsequent duress) to members of the community. Looks like his killers nipped that ongoing individual threat in the bud. You seem sad about that.

    Replies: @Jack D

    And you seem quite unsad that Till received an extrajudicial death penalty for mouthing off.

    • Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Jack D


    And you seem quite unsad that Till received an extrajudicial death penalty for mouthing off.
     
    Counselor, you have a problem with stating the whole truth: He mouthed off after being correctly identified and detained as a specific known physical threat to the community. What you melodramatically call a “death penalty” was merely the Law of the Jungle applied to unrepentant jungle behavior. The happy news is young Emmett wouldn’t later get a chance to rape or kill anyone as his dad liked to do. But if you, a termite, would rather have had young (and later, older) Emmett running around free to rape, you deserve the same treatment as him. 💀

    Replies: @Jack D

  189. NYT article on this important development:

    Biden to Name National Monument for Emmett Till and His Mother
    The monument, expected to be established on Tuesday, will consist of three protected sites in Illinois and Mississippi.

    https://archive.li/vKceq

  190. @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Legba

    "I remember her [Madonna] as the talentless slut that she still is."


    You have your terms confused.

    If you are chasing after everybody else, then you are a slut.

    But if everybody else is chasing after you, then you are a rock star.

    Since you seem to have never been either one of these, you are thus excused from the rest of this discussion.

    Replies: @Legba, @vinnyvette

    If you are chasing after everybody else, then you are a slut.

    But if everybody else is chasing after you, then you are a rock star.

    So which rock band is your mother in?

  191. @Corvinus
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    “Getting a beat-down or killing for not knowing your place wasn’t invented by early 20th century Southerners”

    No, but it was practiced religiously there. Which ended up to be illegal and immoral.

    Replies: @Prester John

    It ended up illegal.

    It was always immoral.

  192. @Jack D
    @Anonymous Jew

    Murders of whites in S. Africa are also way up, but maintaining a system of minority rule by terror is unsustainable in the long run. Whites in the American South drew the wrong lesson after Haiti - they should have put their Africans back on a boat instead of doubling down on permanent rule by terror. Anything short of that was just kicking the can down the road .

    Replies: @Prester John, @Ennui, @Art Deco, @fredyetagain aka superhonky

    They should never have been brought over in the first place, but that’s another story. It’s all, er, very “complex” you know.

  193. @Ennui
    @AnotherDad

    What were the Puritans if not Minoritarians? The English and Dutch colonies were populated by minoritarian snowflakes. Victimization was pioneered by Irish Catholics and assorted Protestant groups in this country.


    If you want people with a healthy sense of collective, corporate identity, you'd need to settle in the French or Spanish colonies.

    Replies: @Prester John

    Read a piece a few weeks ago somewhere, I don’t remember where, in which the author traced modern progressivism and its inevitable byproduct, the woke phenomenon, back to the Calvinism embraced by our friends who were on board the Mayflower and Speedwell. I have always thought that over the centuries, the old Genevan Reformer has had a greater influence upon American society (in matters religious or otherwise) than I think he gets credit for.

  194. @Jack D
    @Anonymous Jew

    Murders of whites in S. Africa are also way up, but maintaining a system of minority rule by terror is unsustainable in the long run. Whites in the American South drew the wrong lesson after Haiti - they should have put their Africans back on a boat instead of doubling down on permanent rule by terror. Anything short of that was just kicking the can down the road .

    Replies: @Prester John, @Ennui, @Art Deco, @fredyetagain aka superhonky

    More complicated than that. Haitian rebellion was initially led by mixed race colonials angry that they didn’t get the respect that white French bureaucrats from the metropole got. Many were educated in France, and came from older families even if their mothers were of African descent.

    Once rebellion started, the actual black field hands joined in, to the chagrin of the coloured elites. Said colored elites sowed the whirlwind. The French were “distracted” by events at home. Sans the Revolutionary era, the French could have cracked down on the slaves. Malaria also didn’t help.

    Something very similar happened with disgruntled criollos like Simon Bolivar in Latin America. They were descendants of conquistadors but were treated like second class citizens by poor peninsulare bureaucrats.

    In South America, the irony is the slaves and lower classes allied with the Spanish Royal forces against the criollo middle class. The lower class, mixed llaneros from what is now Venezuela allied with the Spanish royals and engaged in a reign of terror against the revolutionary-inclined criollos.

    You can terrorize and kill your way into complete control. Just ask Spartacus and his guys how successfully they ended Roman slavery and latifundia.

  195. @Jack D
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    And you seem quite unsad that Till received an extrajudicial death penalty for mouthing off.

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican

    And you seem quite unsad that Till received an extrajudicial death penalty for mouthing off.

    Counselor, you have a problem with stating the whole truth: He mouthed off after being correctly identified and detained as a specific known physical threat to the community. What you melodramatically call a “death penalty” was merely the Law of the Jungle applied to unrepentant jungle behavior. The happy news is young Emmett wouldn’t later get a chance to rape or kill anyone as his dad liked to do. But if you, a termite, would rather have had young (and later, older) Emmett running around free to rape, you deserve the same treatment as him. 💀

    • Agree: Alden, Adam Smith
    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Jenner Ickham Errican


    the Law of the Jungle applied to unrepentant jungle behavior.
     
    I understand that Blacks have no agency but I thought that white people are supposed to be better than that.

    I would have liked for young Emmett to be tried and convicted according to law for his crimes if any. There was some accusation that he groped or touched Bryant and didn't just make suggestive remarks. If this could have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt then as a teenage 1st offender the proper sentence would have probably been probation and counseling. If he was just mouthing off to her, that's not a crime at all. We don't executed people for "pre-crime" like in some science fiction movie. We don't live in a jungle.

    Taking jungle people and putting them in a civilized environment is problematic, which is why it shouldn't have been done in the 1st place. But once it is done, if you operate according to jungle principles that means that you have lost the battle. The idea is to bring blacks up to our level, not to descend to theirs.

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Art Deco, @Kylie, @Alden

  196. res says:
    @Mike Tre
    @res

    "He really was murdered for racist reasons and it’s not wrong to have a monument to him. "

    So was Mary Phagan, but hey hey, we don't go there here.

    And I've read one of Till's killers was in fact a negro.

    Replies: @res

    And I’ve read one of Till’s killers was in fact a negro.

    There were three black men involved. From what I can tell one was involved all the way through (Levi “Too Tight” Collins ).

    This comment has quotes and references.
    https://www.unz.com/isteve/nyt-questions-swirl-after-yet-another-emmett-till-sign-comes-down/#comment-4886406

    Also see this comment.
    https://www.unz.com/isteve/emmett-tills-victim-dies-before-she-can-by-lynched/#comment-5937485

    • Thanks: Mike Tre
  197. @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Legba

    "I remember her [Madonna] as the talentless slut that she still is."


    You have your terms confused.

    If you are chasing after everybody else, then you are a slut.

    But if everybody else is chasing after you, then you are a rock star.

    Since you seem to have never been either one of these, you are thus excused from the rest of this discussion.

    Replies: @Legba, @vinnyvette

    “I remember her [Madonna] as the talentless slut that she still is.”

    You have your terms confused.

    If you are chasing after everybody else, then you are a slut.

    But if everybody else is chasing after you, then you are a rock star.

    Since you seem to have never been either one of these, you are thus excused from the rest of this discussion.

    Wrong! A slut is a loose woman, has nothing to do with being the chaser or the chased.

    Madonna is, and always has been a talentless slut! She’s responsible for casting the die of future generations of talentless sluts like Lady Gaga and Katy Perry, and Miley Cirus. Who are all at least partly responsible for the “slut centric” society we now live in.

  198. Only a mere monument for brother Tlll?
    I thought you hadn’t made the big time until you were honored with a U.S. postal stamp?
    How many are going to travel to east bumb fuck Egypt to see the monument? But every time you open your mail, you’d be forced to look at his ugly, black mug on the envelope.

    Most white people have never heard of Emmitt Till, but we all have to purchase stamps and open our mail. If you want to piss white nationalists off, the best way is to shove it down their throats on a daily basis. And the entire point of this exercise is to piss off white nationalists.

  199. res says:
    @Alden
    @Jack D

    The killing of Emmett Till was eugenic. How many rapist sons grandsons and great grandsons would he have left as his criminal rapist legacy had he lived.

    Back in the 1930s a study began to discover if rape was a genetic thing. Rape victims who got pregnant with boys who kept and raised the sons of the rapists were contacted. The mothers promised to allow the researchers to follow their sons for life.

    1930s 40s when all the intellectuals and not really experts believed in nurture may nature. The researchers obtained a variety of mothers and sons from different regions economic status ethnicities religion etc to obtain a large number of subjects.

    The results of the study was amazing. By age 25, 40 percent of the sons of rapists had been convicted not just accused of rape. By 30 even more had been convicted of rape.

    Genetics and DNA rule. It’s a good thing the inherited Till rapist gene was removed from the gene pool.

    Replies: @res

    Back in the 1930s a study began to discover if rape was a genetic thing. Rape victims who got pregnant with boys who kept and raised the sons of the rapists were contacted. The mothers promised to allow the researchers to follow their sons for life.

    1930s 40s when all the intellectuals and not really experts believed in nurture may nature. The researchers obtained a variety of mothers and sons from different regions economic status ethnicities religion etc to obtain a large number of subjects.

    The results of the study was amazing. By age 25, 40 percent of the sons of rapists had been convicted not just accused of rape. By 30 even more had been convicted of rape.

    That sounds believable, but I have not been able to find the study. Based on your comment it sounds like the study would have been done in the 1960s or later (at least 30 years old after birth in the 1930s?). Can you offer any information (e.g. authors, publication date, keywords, notable aspects like location which might help a search) to help me look?

    Some links I ran across while looking. First, to tie this into the current victim culture (from the UK).

    Daisy’s Law’: New Research Commissioned By Centre For Women’s Justice Demonstrates Why Children Born From Rape Should Be Recognised As ‘Victims’ In Law

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pregnancy_from_rape

    https://trauma.blog.yorku.ca/2016/01/children-born-of-rape-face-a-painful-legacy/

    Growing Up Under a Shadow: Key Issues in Research on and Treatment of Children Born of Rape
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237268738_Growing_Up_Under_a_Shadow_Key_Issues_in_Research_on_and_Treatment_of_Children_Born_of_Rape

    Edit: finally realized “heritability rape” was a good search.

    Sexual offending runs in families: A 37-year nationwide study (Sweden)
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4469797

    genetic effects tended to be weaker for rape of an adult (19%) than for child molestation (46%).

    https://archive.nytimes.com/kristof.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/23/do-we-have-a-rape-gene/

    https://www.newsweek.com/can-we-blame-our-bad-behavior-stone-age-genes-80349

    • Replies: @Alden
    @res

    The study began in the mid 1930s with babies and boys under age 6. Continued until the mid 1980s when the oldest boys would have been 50.

    Made into a book. The book was lent to me around 1990 by a psychiatrist who was exec director of one of the many NGOs that parasite on the criminal justice system pretending to rehabilitate criminals. Read it and gave it back to him.

    Most criminals only serve half their sentences. Get paroled conditions of parole they have to refrain from some things like possessing a gun and do some things like going to counseling. Where nerdy White men psychiatrists tried to convince testosterone overload black men that rape is bad. It’s difficult for blacks to understand. “ gouhs muh nees “

    One of mine; on trial for rape out on bail. Court recessed at noon. Judge specifically ordered him to go back to work and stay there till 5/PM.*

    Instead he went downtown and picked up a 15 year old Australian girl in town for a spring break school trip. Drove to the beach raped her. Threw her out of the car. She managed to memorize most of his license plate. He was caught within a few hours. Plead guilty to both rapes the next week. Tourist board and Aussie consulate outraged. Even though the rapist creature was black. And blacks were sacred in San Francisco then as now.

    I had the great joy of sending him off to maximum term at Pelican Bay. Not Quentin or Folsom where his friends could easily visit.

    An even greater joy was the fact that the rapist worked in the jail. Not as a civil servant but for one of the gazillions of mostly Jewish red diaper baby retired weather underground terrorists non profits dedicated to freeing every black criminal to destroy SF.

    It was that Jew non profit organization that raised the maximum amount bail for him. The reason he was out on bail to rape the 15 year old tourist. And they went to court to support him and testify that he was a good man innocent if the first rape. Long criminal record of course. And worked inside the jail counseling criminals for that commie Jew non profit.

    Conservatives complain about the cost of real government employees. They should complain about the endless tax deductible donation non profits pretending to duplicate government services. At one time we counted up all the non profit commie scum rehabilitating and counseling criminals in the county. Exactly what we suspected. More non profit commie scum counseling criminals than there were criminals in the county.

    Then of course there’s the police investigators criminal attorneys victim’s medical care and compensation probation and parole city and county jails state and federal prisons half way houses.

    All this money spent on people who never should have been born.

    Replies: @res

  200. @Jack D
    @Anonymous Jew

    Murders of whites in S. Africa are also way up, but maintaining a system of minority rule by terror is unsustainable in the long run. Whites in the American South drew the wrong lesson after Haiti - they should have put their Africans back on a boat instead of doubling down on permanent rule by terror. Anything short of that was just kicking the can down the road .

    Replies: @Prester John, @Ennui, @Art Deco, @fredyetagain aka superhonky

    South African blacks weren’t ruled by terror. There was an intricate web of laws and regulations enforced by police officers and civilian inspectors and a regular court system. You did have rioting subject to quite bloody suppression (1960, 1976). The real terror came from rampant street crime (see how the subject is treated in Alan Paton’s Cry, the Beloved Country). After 1982, there was a generalized breakdown in public order from political gang violence. The police weren’t causing that.
    ==
    If there’s a woulda coulda shoulda period in South African history it would be the years running from 1902 to 1910.

    • Replies: @J.Ross
    @Art Deco

    Thank you. They oppressed Nelson ["]I Would Die To Kill White Children["] so much that they allowed him to become a lawyer with a law office.

  201. @Dan Smith
    Enough about lynching already. As everyone ought to know, lynching involves removal of an accused criminal from proper authorities by civilians. Till wasn't accused of breaking any laws and he wasn't in custody. Yeah, he was murdered. So were a lot of blacks who aren't getting any recognition. The three civil rights workers murdered in Mississippi in 1964 (Cheney, Goodman, and Schwerner) were killed with the collusion of law enforcement. That was a lynching.

    Replies: @Mike Tre, @Observator, @Achmed E. Newman, @AceDeuce, @NotAnonymousHere, @G. Poulin

    Good riddance to the three communist “civil rights workers”. Too bad they didn’t get them all.

  202. 6072686

    This is a reply to a comment still in moderation. The truth hurts, Steve-o.

  203. res says:
    @Art Deco
    @AceDeuce

    His draft card says 'Madrid'.
    ==
    There was a marriage license issued to Pomp Till and Clarissa Green, both of Leforge, Mo. The license was issued in New Madrid, Mo. on 1 January 1921. Louis Till was born on 22 February 1922. Pomp Till was shot to death in New Madrid on 19 June 1927. His wife had died some time earlier.

    Replies: @AceDeuce, @res

    His draft card says ‘Madrid’.

    Where do you see that? His 9 Jul 1942 enlistment record on FamilySearch just says MISSOURI with no image.
    https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:K8Y5-XSW

    Pomp Till’s marriage certificate is available at
    https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QSQ-G989-36K6

    Both FamilySearch and FindaGrave give Louis Till’s birth as 7 Feb 1922, but neither has a source. Do you?
    https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/9VQG-FDY
    https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/10967775/louis-till

    Pomp Till was shot to death in New Madrid on 19 June 1927. His wife had died some time earlier.

    Do you have sources for either of those?

    Any idea why Wikipedia claims he was born in Cape Girardeau? For reference, Cape Girardeau is about 50 miles away from New Madrid.

    This 2022 article has a number of sourced photos which I had not seen elsewhere.
    https://murderousroots.com/episodes/summersode-8-a-tragic-murder-in-mississippi

    P.S. Did you ever find the autopsy report putting “his height at 5’0″ and his weight at 118#” (referring to Emmett Till)?
    https://www.unz.com/isteve/emmett-tills-victim-dies-before-she-can-by-lynched/#comment-5940533

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @res

    The digitized image of his draft card is available via Ancestry.com.

    Replies: @res

  204. res says:
    @Pixo
    @AnotherDad

    I don’t know what you infer from BGI having an email listserv that begs for free data. The big advances in GWAS/IQ are still mostly among whites.

    Enhancement of IQ beyond what you’d expect from the parents turns out to be harder than we might have expected 15 years ago. I don’t think it will be common anywhere in the world even 20 years from now. But for the reason I stated it will be most common in CA.

    Race realist intellectuals on genetics and IQ topics are heavily Jewish. But you want to keep complaining about Gould, keep barking at the moon.

    https://twitter.com/UBERSOY1/status/1676458973174591489

    Replies: @res

    Enhancement of IQ beyond what you’d expect from the parents turns out to be harder than we might have expected 15 years ago. I don’t think it will be common anywhere in the world even 20 years from now.

    How can you say that given the ability to select among multiple embryos? Gwern gives a comprehensive overview here.
    https://gwern.net/embryo-selection

    Thanks for that Twitter link. Emil’s original blog post from June is quite interesting (and I had missed it).
    https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/2023/06/what-are-the-most-important-human-biodiversity-books/

    I think this plot of rating vs. “popularity” (# ratings) is informative. Perhaps worth giving the books above the regression line some extra attention?

    Also worth looking at the plot of the correlation (only 0.48 ; ) of survey ratings with Emil’s ratings.

    • Replies: @Pixo
    @res

    Ubersoy also had a more detailed substack post on Jewish contributions to race/IQ debates.

    I like Gwern’s writeup of embryo selection for intelligence and basically agree with it. And in theory, I would do it myself. And I even looked into it seriously and got as far as talking to the leading US company. However, couples that actively want more children tend not to be careful with birth control so… no embryo selection for me. Maybe on Number 4 in a few more years. Thus, as someone with both the awareness of, desire for, and means for embryo selection, I still didn’t. 95% of 1st world potential parents won’t even meet these three thresholds in 15-20 years IMO.

    What sold me the most on the idea wasn’t so much as maxxing my children’s IQ, but avoiding a lower IQ child who doesn’t have any special defects, but just happens to be at the bottom of the expected range.

    Replies: @res

  205. @Jim Don Bob
    @AnotherDad

    The always excellent Micheal Anton: https://compactmag.com/article/the-pessimistic-case-for-the-future

    Replies: @res

    Excellent piece. Thanks!

  206. Anonymous[213] • Disclaimer says:
    @Reg Cæsar
    @Jack D


    He really was murdered for racist reasons...
     
    We don't know that, and we can't. Had this been the local sheriff's son, they would have acted differently. But what if a mouthy white Chicago kid had done the same? Would he have been killed as well? Maybe, maybe not. (Depends on their view of "Yankees".) We don't know.

    But we can be sure that in such a case, the jury would have "deliberated" a bit longer. We forget (or aren't told) that the real scandal to mid-1950s Americans wasn't the crime itself, but the offhand exoneration.

    Similar to how the draft-card burners a decade later weren't protesting the draft itself, but the war. (They weren't being cowards, they were being politicians.) What looks like a minor detail can alter one's view of the entire situation.

    Replies: @CBart, @Jack D, @Anonymous

    Similar to how the draft-card burners a decade later weren’t protesting the draft itself, but the war. (They weren’t being cowards, they were being politicians.)

    Except that, as was noted at the time, “anti-war” protests as a mass crowd phenomenon cratered the moment Nixon all but rendered the draft toothless two years before it was actually abolished outright. (The ’71 and ’72 call ups got less than 100K and 50K inductees respectively, the ’73 one only 646.)

    They were anti-draft, not anti-war–personal not principled.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @Anonymous


    They were anti-draft, not anti-war–personal not principled.
     
    Then why were women involved? They had the ultimate deferment!


    https://vietnamwar.govt.nz/sites/default/files/images/auckl_antiwar2_1972.jpg


    (Yes, that's a trick photo. But it makes the point.)


    As I said, the unprincipled had had much better ways out of the draft: college, conscience, and Canada. Unless you're suggesting the burnings were merely an attempt to get a felony on record.


    “anti-war” protests as a mass crowd phenomenon cratered the moment Nixon all but rendered the draft toothless
     
    Ask the Soviets. They were behind much of it!

    The protests didn't "crater", they petered out-- because our involvement in the war had also. American military deaths in Vietnam:


    1956 - 1959 4
    1960 5
    1961 16
    1962 53
    1963 122
    1964 216
    1965 1,928
    1966 6,350
    1967 11,363
    1968 16,899
    1969 11,780
    1970 6,173
    1971 2,414
    1972 759
    1973 68
    1974 1

    https://www.archives.gov/research/military/vietnam-war/casualty-statistics

     

    This was so easy to look up, one has to question why you didn't.
  207. @From Beer to Paternity
    Biden will establish a national monument...

    It's funny to imagine Biden's concern over the necessity of building ET monuments (he's likely more concerned about his future Jello flavors and diaper change schedule). His gig now is essentially to read the prepared statements his handlers push to the teleprompters. What a way to end one's life...

    We're supposed to believe that grandpa Biden just can't stop thinking about the need we have for more Till (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVsQLlk-T0s).

    Replies: @Kylie

    “His[Poopy’s] gig now is essentially to read the prepared statements his handlers push to the teleprompters. What a way to end one’s life…”

    It’s an infinitely better end than he deserves. He’s a thoroughly loathsome creature, quite aside from his slimy political career.

  208. @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Jack D


    And you seem quite unsad that Till received an extrajudicial death penalty for mouthing off.
     
    Counselor, you have a problem with stating the whole truth: He mouthed off after being correctly identified and detained as a specific known physical threat to the community. What you melodramatically call a “death penalty” was merely the Law of the Jungle applied to unrepentant jungle behavior. The happy news is young Emmett wouldn’t later get a chance to rape or kill anyone as his dad liked to do. But if you, a termite, would rather have had young (and later, older) Emmett running around free to rape, you deserve the same treatment as him. 💀

    Replies: @Jack D

    the Law of the Jungle applied to unrepentant jungle behavior.

    I understand that Blacks have no agency but I thought that white people are supposed to be better than that.

    I would have liked for young Emmett to be tried and convicted according to law for his crimes if any. There was some accusation that he groped or touched Bryant and didn’t just make suggestive remarks. If this could have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt then as a teenage 1st offender the proper sentence would have probably been probation and counseling. If he was just mouthing off to her, that’s not a crime at all. We don’t executed people for “pre-crime” like in some science fiction movie. We don’t live in a jungle.

    Taking jungle people and putting them in a civilized environment is problematic, which is why it shouldn’t have been done in the 1st place. But once it is done, if you operate according to jungle principles that means that you have lost the battle. The idea is to bring blacks up to our level, not to descend to theirs.

    • Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Jack D


    The idea is to bring blacks up to our level
     
    Literally impossible in the aggregate (barring pending artificial eugenic genetic modification tech). Therefore, in the current ‘safari society’, or open-air human zoo, jungle rules reasonably apply from time to time. No reason to get mopey about it.

    Here, this may cheer you up:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9M9Phvor3dg

    Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic

    , @Art Deco
    @Jack D

    Black Americans were imported from West Africa, which has some tropical rain forest but is for the most part savannah. The African countryside is devoted to agriculture and animal husbandry. The Mbuti and the Bushmen may have fascinated anthropologists, but there are only about 200,000 of them.
    ==
    All irrelevant, of course. There are troublesome lumpenproletarians in the black population, but the bulk of them function adequately as service employees, are literate and numerate at a basic level, have bank accounts, drive cars, &c.

    , @Kylie
    @Jack D

    "Taking jungle people and putting them in a civilized environment is problematic, which is why it shouldn’t have been done in the 1st place. But once it is done, if you operate according to jungle principles that means that you have lost the battle. The idea is to bring blacks up to our level, not to descend to theirs."

    I think I understand where you're coming from on this...maybe.

    My take is that Till was murdered. Whatever he did or said to Bryant did not constitute a capital crime. I suspect his words and actions were considered highly provocative in that time and place but the response to the provocation was disproportionate in the extreme.

    My own experience as a rather plain woman 35 years later after moving to a mixed race neighborhood is that yes, black males verbally badger white women in public with mild sexual innuendos, whether or not they know them. It's unpleasant but I never found it threatening and don't recall any other white women saying they felt threatened by it, either. But it is indeed a thing. Of course some white men do this, too, but it does seem more prevalent among blacks.

    But no, the idea is not to bring blacks up to our level and I'm surprised to see you even mention that as a possibility. Blacks certainly can be taught a moral framework but honestly, in my experience it has usually seemed more tenuous and less substantial than we'd like. Just one example, black people can be genuinely friendly and helpful toward others, black or white, and still steal from them or cheat them. They don't seem to experience any cognitive dissonance over this.

    I don't understand why you're gone to bat for Till the way you have without mentioning a far more sympathetic murder victim, James Byrd, Jr. That crime was so horrific that I longed to execute his subhuman murderers myself.

    Replies: @Jack D

    , @Alden
    @Jack D

    Americans have been trying to bring blacks up to semi civilized for 400 years. Hasn’t worked. I remember when the liberal idiot cure for black violence and retardation in public schools was to hire illiterate blacks as teachers administrators superintendents if huge systems like NYC Atlanta Los Angeles Chicago. Didn’t work the blacks are even more wild and violent than they were in 1960s when the stupid idea of illiterate blacks running the public schools began under that race traitor President Kennedy and his attorney general brother another race traitor.

    It hasn’t worked. Your idea that Whites are required to civilize the blacks sounds like a missionary catholic nun. Saint Jacqueline martyred in the Congo by blacks as she clutched a rosary in her hands. Forgiving them for killing her. And begging God to forgive them too.

    If you love blacks do much why didn’t you and your family live in a mixed race “ changing” neighborhood in Philadelphia ?

    750 thousand White men killed each other. Another 50 to 60 thousand civilians White and black died of malnutrition and other effects of war; especially in the border states. The south east plunged into 100 years of poverty and malnutrition.

    That did accomplish something. The black slaves became freemen.

    From about 1920 to the present, the great and good oh so virtuous Whites communists Quakers jews WASPs Irish like the Kennedys and other race traitors turned the nation upside down and inside out to civilize the violent retards.

    The result was the Saint Fentanyl Floyd riots the lives of the police who arrested him ruined and 18 months of riots billions of dollars worth of damage and our great cities destroyed.

  209. res says:
    @James N. Kennett
    @Jack D


    Goodness knows that for 100 years there were monuments throughout the South for traitorous generals (some still stand) who did not deserve them.
     
    Southerners put up those statues in the early 20th Century, to remind people who was boss. The proposed statue of Emmett Till serves the same purpose.

    General Lee opposed statues because he believed they got in the way of reconciliation. He was correct.

    Replies: @res, @AceDeuce

    General Lee opposed statues because he believed they got in the way of reconciliation. He was correct.

    Snopes actually has what reads to me like a reasonable piece on this. Much more there.
    https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/robert-e-lee-confederate-monuments/

    What’s True
    On several occasions before he died, former Confederate General Robert E. Lee expressed opposition to proposals to erect Civil War monuments and memorials, including some devoted specifically to the Confederacy.

    What’s Undetermined
    It’s unclear whether, or to what degree, Lee’s antipathy toward Confederate monuments was more pronounced than his antipathy toward building Civil War monuments in general.

    One thing I think should be emphasized more is that Lee offered a qualification. The usual quote follows (emphasis mine though).

    As regards the erection of such a monument as is contemplated,” Lee wrote of an 1866 proposal, “my conviction is, that however grateful it would be to the feelings of the South, the attempt in the present condition of the Country, would have the effect of retarding, instead of accelerating its accomplishment; [and] of continuing, if not adding to, the difficulties under which the Southern people labour.

    The full letter is here.
    http://leefamilyarchive.org/papers/letters/transcripts-UVA/v076.html

    I think the immediately following sentence also lessens the force of the quote above.

    All I think that can now be done, is to aid our noble & generous women in their efforts to protect the graves & mark the last resting places of those who have fallen, & wait for better times.

  210. @Jack D
    @Jenner Ickham Errican


    the Law of the Jungle applied to unrepentant jungle behavior.
     
    I understand that Blacks have no agency but I thought that white people are supposed to be better than that.

    I would have liked for young Emmett to be tried and convicted according to law for his crimes if any. There was some accusation that he groped or touched Bryant and didn't just make suggestive remarks. If this could have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt then as a teenage 1st offender the proper sentence would have probably been probation and counseling. If he was just mouthing off to her, that's not a crime at all. We don't executed people for "pre-crime" like in some science fiction movie. We don't live in a jungle.

    Taking jungle people and putting them in a civilized environment is problematic, which is why it shouldn't have been done in the 1st place. But once it is done, if you operate according to jungle principles that means that you have lost the battle. The idea is to bring blacks up to our level, not to descend to theirs.

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Art Deco, @Kylie, @Alden

    The idea is to bring blacks up to our level

    Literally impossible in the aggregate (barring pending artificial eugenic genetic modification tech). Therefore, in the current ‘safari society’, or open-air human zoo, jungle rules reasonably apply from time to time. No reason to get mopey about it.

    Here, this may cheer you up:

    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Ironically, the Last White Decade.

  211. @res
    @Art Deco


    His draft card says ‘Madrid’.
     
    Where do you see that? His 9 Jul 1942 enlistment record on FamilySearch just says MISSOURI with no image.
    https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:K8Y5-XSW

    Pomp Till's marriage certificate is available at
    https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QSQ-G989-36K6

    Both FamilySearch and FindaGrave give Louis Till's birth as 7 Feb 1922, but neither has a source. Do you?
    https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/9VQG-FDY
    https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/10967775/louis-till

    Pomp Till was shot to death in New Madrid on 19 June 1927. His wife had died some time earlier.
     
    Do you have sources for either of those?

    Any idea why Wikipedia claims he was born in Cape Girardeau? For reference, Cape Girardeau is about 50 miles away from New Madrid.

    This 2022 article has a number of sourced photos which I had not seen elsewhere.
    https://murderousroots.com/episodes/summersode-8-a-tragic-murder-in-mississippi

    P.S. Did you ever find the autopsy report putting "his height at 5’0″ and his weight at 118#" (referring to Emmett Till)?
    https://www.unz.com/isteve/emmett-tills-victim-dies-before-she-can-by-lynched/#comment-5940533

    Replies: @Art Deco

    The digitized image of his draft card is available via Ancestry.com.

    • Replies: @res
    @Art Deco

    Thanks. Have to wait until next time I make it to a library to look that up. Any other good references that are Ancestry only?

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

  212. @Art Deco
    @Jack D

    South African blacks weren't ruled by terror. There was an intricate web of laws and regulations enforced by police officers and civilian inspectors and a regular court system. You did have rioting subject to quite bloody suppression (1960, 1976). The real terror came from rampant street crime (see how the subject is treated in Alan Paton's Cry, the Beloved Country). After 1982, there was a generalized breakdown in public order from political gang violence. The police weren't causing that.
    ==
    If there's a woulda coulda shoulda period in South African history it would be the years running from 1902 to 1910.

    Replies: @J.Ross

    Thank you. They oppressed Nelson [“]I Would Die To Kill White Children[“] so much that they allowed him to become a lawyer with a law office.

  213. @Jack D
    @Jenner Ickham Errican


    the Law of the Jungle applied to unrepentant jungle behavior.
     
    I understand that Blacks have no agency but I thought that white people are supposed to be better than that.

    I would have liked for young Emmett to be tried and convicted according to law for his crimes if any. There was some accusation that he groped or touched Bryant and didn't just make suggestive remarks. If this could have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt then as a teenage 1st offender the proper sentence would have probably been probation and counseling. If he was just mouthing off to her, that's not a crime at all. We don't executed people for "pre-crime" like in some science fiction movie. We don't live in a jungle.

    Taking jungle people and putting them in a civilized environment is problematic, which is why it shouldn't have been done in the 1st place. But once it is done, if you operate according to jungle principles that means that you have lost the battle. The idea is to bring blacks up to our level, not to descend to theirs.

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Art Deco, @Kylie, @Alden

    Black Americans were imported from West Africa, which has some tropical rain forest but is for the most part savannah. The African countryside is devoted to agriculture and animal husbandry. The Mbuti and the Bushmen may have fascinated anthropologists, but there are only about 200,000 of them.
    ==
    All irrelevant, of course. There are troublesome lumpenproletarians in the black population, but the bulk of them function adequately as service employees, are literate and numerate at a basic level, have bank accounts, drive cars, &c.

  214. @Jack D
    @Jenner Ickham Errican


    the Law of the Jungle applied to unrepentant jungle behavior.
     
    I understand that Blacks have no agency but I thought that white people are supposed to be better than that.

    I would have liked for young Emmett to be tried and convicted according to law for his crimes if any. There was some accusation that he groped or touched Bryant and didn't just make suggestive remarks. If this could have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt then as a teenage 1st offender the proper sentence would have probably been probation and counseling. If he was just mouthing off to her, that's not a crime at all. We don't executed people for "pre-crime" like in some science fiction movie. We don't live in a jungle.

    Taking jungle people and putting them in a civilized environment is problematic, which is why it shouldn't have been done in the 1st place. But once it is done, if you operate according to jungle principles that means that you have lost the battle. The idea is to bring blacks up to our level, not to descend to theirs.

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Art Deco, @Kylie, @Alden

    “Taking jungle people and putting them in a civilized environment is problematic, which is why it shouldn’t have been done in the 1st place. But once it is done, if you operate according to jungle principles that means that you have lost the battle. The idea is to bring blacks up to our level, not to descend to theirs.”

    I think I understand where you’re coming from on this…maybe.

    My take is that Till was murdered. Whatever he did or said to Bryant did not constitute a capital crime. I suspect his words and actions were considered highly provocative in that time and place but the response to the provocation was disproportionate in the extreme.

    My own experience as a rather plain woman 35 years later after moving to a mixed race neighborhood is that yes, black males verbally badger white women in public with mild sexual innuendos, whether or not they know them. It’s unpleasant but I never found it threatening and don’t recall any other white women saying they felt threatened by it, either. But it is indeed a thing. Of course some white men do this, too, but it does seem more prevalent among blacks.

    But no, the idea is not to bring blacks up to our level and I’m surprised to see you even mention that as a possibility. Blacks certainly can be taught a moral framework but honestly, in my experience it has usually seemed more tenuous and less substantial than we’d like. Just one example, black people can be genuinely friendly and helpful toward others, black or white, and still steal from them or cheat them. They don’t seem to experience any cognitive dissonance over this.

    I don’t understand why you’re gone to bat for Till the way you have without mentioning a far more sympathetic murder victim, James Byrd, Jr. That crime was so horrific that I longed to execute his subhuman murderers myself.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Kylie

    The reason I've gone to bat for him is some people here seem to have the notion that executing Till for whistling at a while woman was fitting punishment. To me this sounds insane. If that was the culture of the South (at it wasn't) then that culture would have been insane also.

    Replies: @William Badwhite

  215. @James N. Kennett
    @Jack D


    Goodness knows that for 100 years there were monuments throughout the South for traitorous generals (some still stand) who did not deserve them.
     
    Southerners put up those statues in the early 20th Century, to remind people who was boss. The proposed statue of Emmett Till serves the same purpose.

    General Lee opposed statues because he believed they got in the way of reconciliation. He was correct.

    Replies: @res, @AceDeuce

    Southerners put up those statues in the early 20th Century, to remind people who was boss. The proposed statue of Emmett Till serves the same purpose.

    General Lee opposed statues because he believed they got in the way of reconciliation. He was correct.

    Bullcrap about the Confederate statues. You’re right about the negro molester Till statue.

    FYI: In “the early 20th Century”, there were still thousands upon thousands of Union vets still alive, including a sizable number of wounded/maimed. Many of the vets were prominent in federal government. After Andrew Johnson and through McKinley, 30 years or so, Presidents were all Yankees and nearly every one was a Union Vet-several saw combat.

    There were thousands upon thousands of Northerners still mourning husbands, fathers, friends, brothers, and even sons.

    Evidently, those people, as well as the U.S. government, did not seriously try and prevent Southern states from putting up these monuments, made of marble and bronze–permanent ones.

    Those people, IMHO, had a say-so in the matter. They allowed it. Case closed. People like you and these other 2023 revisionist cucks can go whistle. Go drown yourself if you don’t like them.

    • Agree: Achmed E. Newman
    • Replies: @Jack D
    @AceDeuce

    First of all, peak Confederate monument was many decades after the war. Maybe the 1920s IIRC? The United Daughters of the Confederacy was not formed until 1894, almost 30 years after the war was over. The UDC had a political agenda, not just to commemorate the war dead but to support the KKK and Jim Crow in the (then) present and the monuments served that agenda.

    2nd, it is an interesting question on why the North threw in the towel on Reconstruction. Immediately after the war they did all the right things - passed Constitutional Amendments, saw to it that blacks could vote, etc. and then at some point they just got tired of running an occupation and let the Taliban take over again. It would be interesting to think of an alternative history where the North did not just throw in the towel on Reconstruction. If Lincoln had lived it might have been different.

    Reconciliation was appropriate - Americans are reconciled with Japanese veterans of WWII but what was not appropriate was rolling back the promises made in the 14th Amendment.

    Replies: @G. Poulin, @Art Deco, @rebel yell, @res

  216. @Ralph L
    @AceDeuce

    When I was waiting to get my first NC driver's license, the trooper had to verify the date of birth of an old black guy who never had a birth certificate or other documentation of it. There's a good chance there's no official record of Till until (!) a Census.

    Replies: @AceDeuce, @Reg Cæsar

    I don’t trust negroes saying that stuff. Often a scam. I have a friend who used to work in Social Security. She told me that guys who were claiming to be 40 years old in 2010 (so, claiming to be born in 1970) in NYC or Philly would tell her that the birth state didn’t issue blacks BCs back then (1960s/70s) because “racism”.

  217. @Art Deco
    @res

    The digitized image of his draft card is available via Ancestry.com.

    Replies: @res

    Thanks. Have to wait until next time I make it to a library to look that up. Any other good references that are Ancestry only?

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @res

    I'm at the library now. I don't see him in the draft record, not under "Louis" or "Emmett", which one family source says was his first name. From Ancestry's "World War II Army Enlistment Records, 1938-1946":



    Name Louis Till
    Race Negro (Black)
    Marital Status Separated, with dependents (Separated)
    Rank Private
    Birth Year 1922
    Nativity State or Country Missouri
    Citizenship Citizen
    Residence Cook, Illinois
    Education Grammar school
    Enlistment Date 9 Jul 1942
    Enlistment Place Chicago, Illinois
    Service Number 36392273
    Branch Branch Immaterial - Warrant Officers, USA
    Component Selectees (Enlisted Men)
    Source Civil Life
    Height 70
    Weight 178
     

    Replies: @res, @Art Deco, @Cagey Beast

  218. @Anon
    After all the hilarity here about Emmett Till over the years, I was thrown for a bit of a loop a couple of months ago when I read David Halberstam’s The Fifties and discovered that the Till thing was a really, really big deal at the time, in the way that could only happen when the media universe was three television news shows and a half a dozen news and public affairs magazines, and the entire population consumed that media. So in a way the current Till-mania is making up for the Till blackout during my 1960s-70s education.

    Replies: @Cagey Beast, @res

    People badmouth Boomers too much online but it has to be said that the current political culture is built upon the life experiences and worldview of the ideal Boomer. So the Emmett Till controversy takes on the importance of the fall of the Roman Empire, even for those born decades after he was killed.

  219. @Ebony Obelisk
    @Che Blutarsky

    You are an awful human being

    You should be ashamed if yourself

    People like you are why we cannot have nice things

    One good thing is that demogdarogx Cheney is hapienyhand wgiyres will soon be a minutely

    Replies: @fredyetagain aka superhonky

    One good thing is that demogdarogx Cheney is hapienyhand wgiyres will soon be a minutely

    I think that’s the most intelligent thing you’ve ever written on this site. Congrats.

    • Agree: Adam Smith
    • LOL: William Badwhite
  220. @Anonymous
    @Reg Cæsar


    Similar to how the draft-card burners a decade later weren’t protesting the draft itself, but the war. (They weren’t being cowards, they were being politicians.)
     
    Except that, as was noted at the time, "anti-war" protests as a mass crowd phenomenon cratered the moment Nixon all but rendered the draft toothless two years before it was actually abolished outright. (The '71 and '72 call ups got less than 100K and 50K inductees respectively, the '73 one only 646.)

    They were anti-draft, not anti-war--personal not principled.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    They were anti-draft, not anti-war–personal not principled.

    Then why were women involved? They had the ultimate deferment!

    (Yes, that’s a trick photo. But it makes the point.)

    As I said, the unprincipled had had much better ways out of the draft: college, conscience, and Canada. Unless you’re suggesting the burnings were merely an attempt to get a felony on record.

    “anti-war” protests as a mass crowd phenomenon cratered the moment Nixon all but rendered the draft toothless

    Ask the Soviets. They were behind much of it!

    The protests didn’t “crater”, they petered out– because our involvement in the war had also. American military deaths in Vietnam:

    1956 – 1959 4
    1960 5
    1961 16
    1962 53
    1963 122
    1964 216
    1965 1,928
    1966 6,350
    1967 11,363
    1968 16,899
    1969 11,780
    1970 6,173
    1971 2,414
    1972 759
    1973 68
    1974 1

    https://www.archives.gov/research/military/vietnam-war/casualty-statistics

    This was so easy to look up, one has to question why you didn’t.

  221. @res
    @Art Deco

    Thanks. Have to wait until next time I make it to a library to look that up. Any other good references that are Ancestry only?

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    I’m at the library now. I don’t see him in the draft record, not under “Louis” or “Emmett”, which one family source says was his first name. From Ancestry’s “World War II Army Enlistment Records, 1938-1946”:

    Name Louis Till
    Race Negro (Black)
    Marital Status Separated, with dependents (Separated)
    Rank Private
    Birth Year 1922
    Nativity State or Country Missouri
    Citizenship Citizen
    Residence Cook, Illinois
    Education Grammar school
    Enlistment Date 9 Jul 1942
    Enlistment Place Chicago, Illinois
    Service Number 36392273
    Branch Branch Immaterial – Warrant Officers, USA
    Component Selectees (Enlisted Men)
    Source Civil Life
    Height 70
    Weight 178

    • Replies: @res
    @Reg Cæsar

    Thanks. That looks like the record I linked from FamilySearch. Did yours have an image?

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    , @Art Deco
    @Reg Cæsar

    The database is "U.S., World War II Draft Cards Young Men, 1940-1947" and they have an image of the card itself, filled out on 8 April 1942. The obverse of the card you can look at too.
    ==
    You'll note he is listed as separated from his wife on the card. They'd been married in October 1940.

    Replies: @res

    , @Cagey Beast
    @Reg Cæsar

    Funny that a soldier's religion is not listed.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @fredyetagain aka superhonky

  222. res says:
    @Anon
    After all the hilarity here about Emmett Till over the years, I was thrown for a bit of a loop a couple of months ago when I read David Halberstam’s The Fifties and discovered that the Till thing was a really, really big deal at the time, in the way that could only happen when the media universe was three television news shows and a half a dozen news and public affairs magazines, and the entire population consumed that media. So in a way the current Till-mania is making up for the Till blackout during my 1960s-70s education.

    Replies: @Cagey Beast, @res

    How true is that? There were definitely some high profile articles (e.g. Look), but Emmett Till does not show up on Google Books Ngram Viewer until 1965. Increases steadily until the late 70s then muddles along at that level until 2003 when the recent ascent begins.
    https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=emmett+till&year_start=1950&year_end=2019&corpus=en-2019&smoothing=3

    This 1987 paper would be helpful, but I don’t see full text. The abstract seems in agreement with Halberstam.
    Racial Coverage of the 1950s Print Media and the Case of Emmett Till.
    https://eric.ed.gov/?q=kidnapping&pg=4&id=ED283167

    The Emmett Till murder case in 1955 marked the turning point in the coverage of blacks by the white American press. Till, a black teenager from Chicago, was murdered in 1955 while visiting relatives in Mississippi. The Till murder was covered extensively in the press, since the two white men charged with killing him were acquitted by an all-white, all-male jury on murder charges and later that year were found innocent by a 20-man all-white grand jury on kidnapping charges. At first, most Southern papers denounced Till’s murder, but as the Northern white and black presses began investigating the case, anti-black backlash erupted in Southern publications. Vehement criticism of the South came from “The Crisis,” published by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), and other black publications followed suit. Editorials appearing in “Life” magazine and the “New York Times” were extremely wounding to Southern pride, and the Southern press retaliated. This media “civil war” continued for about a year after the Till case, raising the question of how to handle race-related news in the news media. By 1960, observers and the press itself agreed that coverage of blacks had improved in both the Northern and Southern press. The Till case gave America a harsh, inescapable glimpse of racial violence and injustice. Even so, problems in the press coverage of minority groups persist, and the task begun more than 30 years ago remains to be completed. (Sixty-three references are included.)

    David Halberstam’s The Fifties came out in 1994. Only two of the thousand Amazon reviews mention Emmett Till. The book is available on Libgen if anyone wants to see the Till bits. One thing I had not realized is Till was murdered just a few weeks after Lamar Smith. The latter’s case seems much more outrage worthy to me. (and a few weeks before that was the unexplained murder of the Rev. George Lee)

    A few weeks later in Brookhaven, a black man named Lamar Smith was shot down in cold blood in the middle of the day in front of the county courthouse. Smith was a registered voter who had just voted in the state’s primary election, and he had encouraged others to vote as well. A white farmer was arrested but not indicted. Again the national press did not cover the story. The traditional covenants of Mississippi seemed more powerful than the new law of the land. This was what Mississippi white men had always done, and therefore it was not news. Blacks in Mississippi seemed not only outside the legal protection of the police, but also outside the moral protection of the press.

    FWIW here is Wikipedia’s take.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamar_Smith_(activist)
    If anyone knows more/different please post.

    It is fascinating how the black community always seems to pick the least worthy “victims” to lionize. (scare quotes to indicate there is a wide range of what constitutes victim, some much less valid than others)

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @res

    Political violence makes some sense on a certain level. If your goal is to prevent the blacks of MI from voting then killing a political organizer makes a certain amount of sense (and someone who does political organizing under a terror regime knows the risk that he is taking). If blacks were free to register to vote with impunity in MI then the people in power would have lost power (as indeed they did when the system broke down).

    Murdering a teenager for wolf whistling at your wife does NOT make any sense. Nor does it make any sense that the community shielded the bozos who did it just because they were white. The senselessness of the crime and the community response makes it more memorable. I don't think anyone here (especially those who are claiming that Till deserved it) would be happy with what happened if the races had been reversed. Basically the reverse situation was OJ killing Ron Goldman and no white person I know was happy about OJ's acquittal or thought that Ron deserved to be killed (well maybe the anti-Semites did).

    Ideally you want a system where justice is blind. Once you depart from the principle that justice should be administered regardless of race then it's only a matter of time before it comes back to bite you because you are never going to be able to hold the reins of power forever.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @res, @David In TN

  223. @Ralph L
    @AceDeuce

    When I was waiting to get my first NC driver's license, the trooper had to verify the date of birth of an old black guy who never had a birth certificate or other documentation of it. There's a good chance there's no official record of Till until (!) a Census.

    Replies: @AceDeuce, @Reg Cæsar

    Rand Corp. devised the Soundex system to help the Census and the nascent Social Security system collate various spellings of different surnames. It may be still in use on your driver’s license, depending on the state. (“Sailer” is S-460, “Cæsar” C-260, “Deco” D-200.)

    The government decided to start with the states in the South because their records were particularly bad, or so they said.

    Census Bureau page on Soundex

    Still… Missouri, in 1922? Come on… They had pencils by then.

  224. @Reg Cæsar
    @res

    I'm at the library now. I don't see him in the draft record, not under "Louis" or "Emmett", which one family source says was his first name. From Ancestry's "World War II Army Enlistment Records, 1938-1946":



    Name Louis Till
    Race Negro (Black)
    Marital Status Separated, with dependents (Separated)
    Rank Private
    Birth Year 1922
    Nativity State or Country Missouri
    Citizenship Citizen
    Residence Cook, Illinois
    Education Grammar school
    Enlistment Date 9 Jul 1942
    Enlistment Place Chicago, Illinois
    Service Number 36392273
    Branch Branch Immaterial - Warrant Officers, USA
    Component Selectees (Enlisted Men)
    Source Civil Life
    Height 70
    Weight 178
     

    Replies: @res, @Art Deco, @Cagey Beast

    Thanks. That looks like the record I linked from FamilySearch. Did yours have an image?

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @res

    Wait... a draft card does show up. Their search system isn't consistent. Here's a link, with an image, if you can use it:


    This is fascinating-- the first (or second; it's unclear) American soldier to die in Vietnam was born a few years before Louis Till:

    The first American killed in the Vietnam War was born in Minnesota and died watching a movie

    Replies: @res

  225. @Kylie
    @Jack D

    "Taking jungle people and putting them in a civilized environment is problematic, which is why it shouldn’t have been done in the 1st place. But once it is done, if you operate according to jungle principles that means that you have lost the battle. The idea is to bring blacks up to our level, not to descend to theirs."

    I think I understand where you're coming from on this...maybe.

    My take is that Till was murdered. Whatever he did or said to Bryant did not constitute a capital crime. I suspect his words and actions were considered highly provocative in that time and place but the response to the provocation was disproportionate in the extreme.

    My own experience as a rather plain woman 35 years later after moving to a mixed race neighborhood is that yes, black males verbally badger white women in public with mild sexual innuendos, whether or not they know them. It's unpleasant but I never found it threatening and don't recall any other white women saying they felt threatened by it, either. But it is indeed a thing. Of course some white men do this, too, but it does seem more prevalent among blacks.

    But no, the idea is not to bring blacks up to our level and I'm surprised to see you even mention that as a possibility. Blacks certainly can be taught a moral framework but honestly, in my experience it has usually seemed more tenuous and less substantial than we'd like. Just one example, black people can be genuinely friendly and helpful toward others, black or white, and still steal from them or cheat them. They don't seem to experience any cognitive dissonance over this.

    I don't understand why you're gone to bat for Till the way you have without mentioning a far more sympathetic murder victim, James Byrd, Jr. That crime was so horrific that I longed to execute his subhuman murderers myself.

    Replies: @Jack D

    The reason I’ve gone to bat for him is some people here seem to have the notion that executing Till for whistling at a while woman was fitting punishment. To me this sounds insane. If that was the culture of the South (at it wasn’t) then that culture would have been insane also.

    • Thanks: Kylie
    • Replies: @William Badwhite
    @Jack D


    The reason I’ve gone to bat for him is some people here seem to have the notion that executing Till for whistling at a while woman was fitting punishment.
     



    Again with the half-truths Jack. Jenner got on you for this earlier in the thread, yet you persist with your pervasive dishonesty. He wasn't "executed" for "whistling". You know this of course, which makes you a liar, not merely wrong.

    Now onto your usual form of lying - restate something that someone wrote ("so what you are saying is...") while leaving out some things, sneaking in other things, then arguing with that straw man instead of what the other person actually wrote:

    Provide at least two citations to support your assertion that "some people here seem to have the notion that executing Till for whistling at a while woman was fitting punishment".

    Just kidding, we all know nobody wrote that and this was just another lie.
     

     

    Replies: @Jack D

  226. @Art Deco
    @Jack D

    You're offering an explanation of some of the perpetrators' motives, and the jury's. That is irrelevant. He was an ordinary youth and, as ordinary youths are, of interest to his friends and relations.
    ==
    My grandfather had a cousin in the Army Air Corps who died in a plane crash during the war. (He was the pilot and sole occupant). He left a wife and daughter. Being in uniform, being married, and fathering a daughter made his life of more significance than Emmett Till's (which is different than saying it was of greater value). His monument is a gravestone in a cemetery in the small town where he grew up.

    Replies: @Pirate King of Arkansas

    Well said, Good Sir.

    I appreciated your comment regarding your WWII Veteran ancestor.

    Spot on. Indicative & symbolic of the Clown World the US has become. Thank you for your comment.

  227. @AnotherDad
    @Jack D

    Oh boy, you're in fine minoritarian narrative spinning this morning there Jack. Whitey be racist oppressors. You should write for the NYT.

    --


    traitorous generals
     
    I'm a republican. I'm for a nation of free high wage/high productivity people governing themselves. I've got zero use for slavery, serfdom, nor the "must have immigration!" cheap labor shills--any of their sleazy ideologies or systems. That goes for the Confederacy.

    But these generals were following along with what their states had decided--to leave the Union. I think their system is vile and backward and secession was stupid, but they were loyal to the people in their states and communities who had voted in secession. And fighting a Union army seeking to overthrow that decision by invading their states.

    Compare to our "elite" of "must have immigration!" shills, intentionally selling out and trashing the future of the American people and their posterity. Those scum are actually disloyal and truly "traitorous" to the people and nation they owe loyalty to.

    --


    He really was murdered for racist reasons
     
    Till was not murdered randomly. He was murdered for putting his hands on another man's wife--or at least scaring the bejesus out of her so she went running to car for her gun. This sort of stuff has led to plenty of beatings and murders down through the ages. The he was black--and a apparently stubbornly unrepentant--along with the low character of Roy Bryant and his half brother were what juiced this to murder. And yes, the racial context of Jim Crow--not wanting to tell blacks that Till's behavior would be tolerated--was what got Bryant and Milam off.

    But this was hardly, like "these black guys have taken our jobs" or "we don't like these people and are going to run them out of town" murder. It was a husband's very personal beef with Till's crude behavior toward his wife.

    --


    and it’s not wrong to have a monument to him.

     

    Wow. The Asians are going to claim a whole bunch of these "racist reasons murder" national monuments. But I think I'll stick with my gal Kylie and drag the grandkids to The Channon Christian and Christopher Newsome Racist Murder National Monument (the CCCNRMNM). I look forward to the "Biden" administration announcing that.

    Replies: @Hypnotoad666, @Ed Case, @Pirate King of Arkansas

    Thank You for your comment regarding Channon Christian & Christopher Newsome.

    I had the exact same thought immediately after reading this abomination of an announcement that defies all logic, rationale, & reason.

    Beyond appalling. Beyond sickening.

  228. @res
    @Reg Cæsar

    Thanks. That looks like the record I linked from FamilySearch. Did yours have an image?

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    Wait… a draft card does show up. Their search system isn’t consistent. Here’s a link, with an image, if you can use it:

    This is fascinating– the first (or second; it’s unclear) American soldier to die in Vietnam was born a few years before Louis Till:

    The first American killed in the Vietnam War was born in Minnesota and died watching a movie

    • Replies: @res
    @Reg Cæsar

    I can't use that link right now, but it is helpful. Thanks. Either need to be at the library or if someone has an active Ancestry account should be able to just remove library from the site name and use it.

  229. @res
    @Pixo


    Enhancement of IQ beyond what you’d expect from the parents turns out to be harder than we might have expected 15 years ago. I don’t think it will be common anywhere in the world even 20 years from now.
     
    How can you say that given the ability to select among multiple embryos? Gwern gives a comprehensive overview here.
    https://gwern.net/embryo-selection

    Thanks for that Twitter link. Emil's original blog post from June is quite interesting (and I had missed it).
    https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/2023/06/what-are-the-most-important-human-biodiversity-books/

    I think this plot of rating vs. "popularity" (# ratings) is informative. Perhaps worth giving the books above the regression line some extra attention?
    https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/number-of-ratings-vs.-mean-rating.png

    Also worth looking at the plot of the correlation (only 0.48 ; ) of survey ratings with Emil's ratings.

    Replies: @Pixo

    Ubersoy also had a more detailed substack post on Jewish contributions to race/IQ debates.

    I like Gwern’s writeup of embryo selection for intelligence and basically agree with it. And in theory, I would do it myself. And I even looked into it seriously and got as far as talking to the leading US company. However, couples that actively want more children tend not to be careful with birth control so… no embryo selection for me. Maybe on Number 4 in a few more years. Thus, as someone with both the awareness of, desire for, and means for embryo selection, I still didn’t. 95% of 1st world potential parents won’t even meet these three thresholds in 15-20 years IMO.

    What sold me the most on the idea wasn’t so much as maxxing my children’s IQ, but avoiding a lower IQ child who doesn’t have any special defects, but just happens to be at the bottom of the expected range.

    • Replies: @res
    @Pixo

    Thanks. Link to that post.
    https://ubersoy.substack.com/p/jewish-involvement-in-racial-hereditarianism

    I did not go through his list in detail, but both Jensen and Eysenck are marginal cases.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Jensen#Early_life
    https://theconversation.com/why-did-britains-most-prominent-psychologist-deny-his-jewish-heritage-84875


    What sold me the most on the idea wasn’t so much as maxxing my children’s IQ, but avoiding a lower IQ child who doesn’t have any special defects, but just happens to be at the bottom of the expected range.
     
    Seems reasonable to me. I would be much more concerned with avoiding major negatives than attempting to max anything. Worth noting that Steve Hsu's company LifeView (formerly Genomic Prediction) specifically does not look for IQ or non-health phenotypic traits (e.g. height, eye/hair color, etc.). Their PGT-P test is closest to what we are discussing.
    https://lifeview.com/our_tests.html

    Article about PGT-P.
    https://www.timesofisrael.com/designer-babies-hi-tech-preimplantation-genetic-testing-may-soon-come-to-israel/

    Replies: @Pixo, @Pixo

  230. @Reg Cæsar
    @res

    I'm at the library now. I don't see him in the draft record, not under "Louis" or "Emmett", which one family source says was his first name. From Ancestry's "World War II Army Enlistment Records, 1938-1946":



    Name Louis Till
    Race Negro (Black)
    Marital Status Separated, with dependents (Separated)
    Rank Private
    Birth Year 1922
    Nativity State or Country Missouri
    Citizenship Citizen
    Residence Cook, Illinois
    Education Grammar school
    Enlistment Date 9 Jul 1942
    Enlistment Place Chicago, Illinois
    Service Number 36392273
    Branch Branch Immaterial - Warrant Officers, USA
    Component Selectees (Enlisted Men)
    Source Civil Life
    Height 70
    Weight 178
     

    Replies: @res, @Art Deco, @Cagey Beast

    The database is “U.S., World War II Draft Cards Young Men, 1940-1947” and they have an image of the card itself, filled out on 8 April 1942. The obverse of the card you can look at too.
    ==
    You’ll note he is listed as separated from his wife on the card. They’d been married in October 1940.

    • Replies: @res
    @Art Deco

    That helps. Here is a search. I assume he is the first hit. Can't see details unless you have an Ancestry account.
    https://www.ancestry.com/search/collections/2238/?name=louis_till&birth=1922&count=50&name_x=_1

  231. @Reg Cæsar
    @res

    Wait... a draft card does show up. Their search system isn't consistent. Here's a link, with an image, if you can use it:


    This is fascinating-- the first (or second; it's unclear) American soldier to die in Vietnam was born a few years before Louis Till:

    The first American killed in the Vietnam War was born in Minnesota and died watching a movie

    Replies: @res

    I can’t use that link right now, but it is helpful. Thanks. Either need to be at the library or if someone has an active Ancestry account should be able to just remove library from the site name and use it.

  232. res says:
    @Pixo
    @res

    Ubersoy also had a more detailed substack post on Jewish contributions to race/IQ debates.

    I like Gwern’s writeup of embryo selection for intelligence and basically agree with it. And in theory, I would do it myself. And I even looked into it seriously and got as far as talking to the leading US company. However, couples that actively want more children tend not to be careful with birth control so… no embryo selection for me. Maybe on Number 4 in a few more years. Thus, as someone with both the awareness of, desire for, and means for embryo selection, I still didn’t. 95% of 1st world potential parents won’t even meet these three thresholds in 15-20 years IMO.

    What sold me the most on the idea wasn’t so much as maxxing my children’s IQ, but avoiding a lower IQ child who doesn’t have any special defects, but just happens to be at the bottom of the expected range.

    Replies: @res

    Thanks. Link to that post.
    https://ubersoy.substack.com/p/jewish-involvement-in-racial-hereditarianism

    I did not go through his list in detail, but both Jensen and Eysenck are marginal cases.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Jensen#Early_life
    https://theconversation.com/why-did-britains-most-prominent-psychologist-deny-his-jewish-heritage-84875

    What sold me the most on the idea wasn’t so much as maxxing my children’s IQ, but avoiding a lower IQ child who doesn’t have any special defects, but just happens to be at the bottom of the expected range.

    Seems reasonable to me. I would be much more concerned with avoiding major negatives than attempting to max anything. Worth noting that Steve Hsu’s company LifeView (formerly Genomic Prediction) specifically does not look for IQ or non-health phenotypic traits (e.g. height, eye/hair color, etc.). Their PGT-P test is closest to what we are discussing.
    https://lifeview.com/our_tests.html

    Article about PGT-P.
    https://www.timesofisrael.com/designer-babies-hi-tech-preimplantation-genetic-testing-may-soon-come-to-israel/

    • Replies: @Pixo
    @res

    Lifeview has become a lot more cagey than when they were in initial startup mode. Probably for the best.

    The service you mention looks at known and spontaneous mutations in important parts of the genome, and probably is nearly at good at selecting for IQ as a pure IQ selection. And superior to pure IQ since eugenic selection has other components.

    I encouraged a friend with a 42yo wife who wanted one more kid to use lifeview under the assumption they’d need to do IVF, when their service is in my view a no-brainer. He ended up bypassing them the natural way too despite his wife’s age.

    , @Pixo
    @res

    “ LifeView (formerly Genomic Prediction) specifically does not look for IQ or non-health phenotypic traits (e.g. height, eye/hair color, etc.).”

    There’s at least two free websites that predict eye and hair color for free from genomes. It isn’t hard to get close to correct, especially eye color. There’s no need for LifeView to tell you this if you want a blond kid, the hard part is having a bunch of viable embryos sequenced.

    Their value-add is they are more currant than free sites on known SNPs and supposedly effectively use AI to predict the effect of unstudied mutations.

    Replies: @res

  233. @Art Deco
    @Reg Cæsar

    The database is "U.S., World War II Draft Cards Young Men, 1940-1947" and they have an image of the card itself, filled out on 8 April 1942. The obverse of the card you can look at too.
    ==
    You'll note he is listed as separated from his wife on the card. They'd been married in October 1940.

    Replies: @res

    That helps. Here is a search. I assume he is the first hit. Can’t see details unless you have an Ancestry account.
    https://www.ancestry.com/search/collections/2238/?name=louis_till&birth=1922&count=50&name_x=_1

  234. The report is incomplete. For instance, is he still dead?

  235. @Reg Cæsar
    @res

    I'm at the library now. I don't see him in the draft record, not under "Louis" or "Emmett", which one family source says was his first name. From Ancestry's "World War II Army Enlistment Records, 1938-1946":



    Name Louis Till
    Race Negro (Black)
    Marital Status Separated, with dependents (Separated)
    Rank Private
    Birth Year 1922
    Nativity State or Country Missouri
    Citizenship Citizen
    Residence Cook, Illinois
    Education Grammar school
    Enlistment Date 9 Jul 1942
    Enlistment Place Chicago, Illinois
    Service Number 36392273
    Branch Branch Immaterial - Warrant Officers, USA
    Component Selectees (Enlisted Men)
    Source Civil Life
    Height 70
    Weight 178
     

    Replies: @res, @Art Deco, @Cagey Beast

    Funny that a soldier’s religion is not listed.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @Cagey Beast


    Funny that a soldier’s religion is not listed.
     
    It's on one's dog tags. Evidently it only matters when he's dead. Or needs a transfusion, or last rites.



    https://www.mydogtag.com/images/photo/thumbs/army-dogtags-cwds-flipside.jpg
    , @fredyetagain aka superhonky
    @Cagey Beast


    Funny that a soldier’s religion is not listed
     
    Can't seem to find mine (probably gave them to a GF back in the day and never got them back), but yes a serviceman's religion is listed on his dog tags. Or at least it was in my day.
  236. @AnotherDad
    @Jack D


    And no your national separation is not happening. Stop fantasizing. Whiteland has as much chance of materializing as Wakanda.
     
    It's not "whiteland" but "America"--a nation for normal productive non-nutty Americans ... who are loyal to America. But otherwise, yeah. On this one, sadly, here you are most likely right.

    But it is still something to worth wishing for, working for--and if it comes to it--fighting for. Ordinary Americans deserve to have a nation of normal productive self-governing Americans who value the old sane stuff like "borders" and "rule of law" and are loyal to each other and "to ourselves our posterity".

    (And while the minoritarians don not deserve a nation ... to achieve separation, they need to get one. And I would be happy to see it ... just to enjoy the shit show! Parasites without a host. LOL.)


    But yeah, our likely future is "slumping toward Brazil". We'll have Holocaust Memorials and Emmett Till National Monuments and Stonewall Memorials and Lea Thomas Statues and kindergarten tranny story hour and "Reparations" as Africans swarm across our "nation of immigrants" memorial political boundary line ("border" being racist) ... while the Chinese do eugenic genetic engineering and engineer race targeted bioweapons.

    My grandkids will sure as hell wish they could live in my fantasy.

    Replies: @Pixo, @Legba, @Jim Don Bob, @Ennui

    Normal Americans invaded the world in their arrogance. The world came back. Everywhere we have large numbers of new arrivals from are places our military went adventuring. There were plenty of examples from recent and ancient history of empires following soldiers back home, but I guess normal Americans or the people they voted for didn’t think history applied to their exceptional nation.

    They got what they asked for. They had their chances going back to William Jennings Bryan, Lindbergh, and Bob Taft. They had a more recent chance with Buchanan and Ron Paul. But normies don’t like pessimism, they like retired serious daddies like Ike, or charmers like JFK and Reagan, they love fairy tales with soaring eagles. So no complaints, they got what they asked for.

    Same with the Brits, they had their Enoch Powells, but decided instead to go Thatcher and Blair.

  237. @Jack D
    @Art Deco

    All over the former E. Bloc there were thousands of statues of Lenin (and for a while, Stalin). Were they there because the locals valued them? To the extent that Civil War generals were popular in the South, part of that was a massive, organized propaganda campaign that was quite successful in brainwashing people. In some places in the E. Bloc, Lenin and Stalin also enjoyed a lot of popularity among ordinary people. For that matter, the ordinary people of German admired Hitler for a while.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Wilkey, @rebel yell, @Hypnotoad666, @Art Deco, @mc23

    The East bloc regimes were satrapies of Soviet Russia, bar Yugoslavia, Albania, and, to a degree, Roumania. All of the regimes did great violence to civil society and vernacular culture (and none more so than the Albanian and Roumanian regimes). I’m not seeing the analogy, here. And you don’t seem to be able to distinguish between popular culture and state media.
    ==
    People are loyal to their relatives, loyal to their ancestors, loyal to the places where they grew up. They are loyal to certain ideals manifest in people’s daily lives. The statues are coming down because callow people want to piss on those ancestors, those places, those ideals. This isn’t that difficult.

    • Thanks: William Badwhite
  238. @res
    @Anon

    How true is that? There were definitely some high profile articles (e.g. Look), but Emmett Till does not show up on Google Books Ngram Viewer until 1965. Increases steadily until the late 70s then muddles along at that level until 2003 when the recent ascent begins.
    https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=emmett+till&year_start=1950&year_end=2019&corpus=en-2019&smoothing=3

    This 1987 paper would be helpful, but I don't see full text. The abstract seems in agreement with Halberstam.
    Racial Coverage of the 1950s Print Media and the Case of Emmett Till.
    https://eric.ed.gov/?q=kidnapping&pg=4&id=ED283167


    The Emmett Till murder case in 1955 marked the turning point in the coverage of blacks by the white American press. Till, a black teenager from Chicago, was murdered in 1955 while visiting relatives in Mississippi. The Till murder was covered extensively in the press, since the two white men charged with killing him were acquitted by an all-white, all-male jury on murder charges and later that year were found innocent by a 20-man all-white grand jury on kidnapping charges. At first, most Southern papers denounced Till's murder, but as the Northern white and black presses began investigating the case, anti-black backlash erupted in Southern publications. Vehement criticism of the South came from "The Crisis," published by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), and other black publications followed suit. Editorials appearing in "Life" magazine and the "New York Times" were extremely wounding to Southern pride, and the Southern press retaliated. This media "civil war" continued for about a year after the Till case, raising the question of how to handle race-related news in the news media. By 1960, observers and the press itself agreed that coverage of blacks had improved in both the Northern and Southern press. The Till case gave America a harsh, inescapable glimpse of racial violence and injustice. Even so, problems in the press coverage of minority groups persist, and the task begun more than 30 years ago remains to be completed. (Sixty-three references are included.)
     
    David Halberstam’s The Fifties came out in 1994. Only two of the thousand Amazon reviews mention Emmett Till. The book is available on Libgen if anyone wants to see the Till bits. One thing I had not realized is Till was murdered just a few weeks after Lamar Smith. The latter's case seems much more outrage worthy to me. (and a few weeks before that was the unexplained murder of the Rev. George Lee)

    A few weeks later in Brookhaven, a black man named Lamar Smith was shot down in cold blood in the middle of the day in front of the county courthouse. Smith was a registered voter who had just voted in the state’s primary election, and he had encouraged others to vote as well. A white farmer was arrested but not indicted. Again the national press did not cover the story. The traditional covenants of Mississippi seemed more powerful than the new law of the land. This was what Mississippi white men had always done, and therefore it was not news. Blacks in Mississippi seemed not only outside the legal protection of the police, but also outside the moral protection of the press.

     

    FWIW here is Wikipedia's take.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamar_Smith_(activist)
    If anyone knows more/different please post.

    It is fascinating how the black community always seems to pick the least worthy "victims" to lionize. (scare quotes to indicate there is a wide range of what constitutes victim, some much less valid than others)

    Replies: @Jack D

    Political violence makes some sense on a certain level. If your goal is to prevent the blacks of MI from voting then killing a political organizer makes a certain amount of sense (and someone who does political organizing under a terror regime knows the risk that he is taking). If blacks were free to register to vote with impunity in MI then the people in power would have lost power (as indeed they did when the system broke down).

    Murdering a teenager for wolf whistling at your wife does NOT make any sense. Nor does it make any sense that the community shielded the bozos who did it just because they were white. The senselessness of the crime and the community response makes it more memorable. I don’t think anyone here (especially those who are claiming that Till deserved it) would be happy with what happened if the races had been reversed. Basically the reverse situation was OJ killing Ron Goldman and no white person I know was happy about OJ’s acquittal or thought that Ron deserved to be killed (well maybe the anti-Semites did).

    Ideally you want a system where justice is blind. Once you depart from the principle that justice should be administered regardless of race then it’s only a matter of time before it comes back to bite you because you are never going to be able to hold the reins of power forever.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @Jack D

    Murdering a teenager for wolf whistling at your wife does NOT make any sense. Nor does it make any sense that the community shielded the bozos who did it just because they were white.
    ==
    Bryant and Milam were put on trial and then acquitted. When the Look article came out, everyone on both sides of the color bar shunned them. They had to close their store within six months, no one would hire them, and no one would rent land to them. They had to leave town. The jury shielded them from a criminal penalty, but no one wanted them around. Harper Lee's narrator in Too Kill a Mockingbird discusses this facially contradictory behavior in her fictional town.

    , @res
    @Jack D


    Political violence makes some sense on a certain level.
     
    Understood. For whatever reason I have less sympathy for it than for an "honor killing" in the heat of the moment. Perhaps because political violence tends to be systematic and done with forethought.

    Murdering a teenager for wolf whistling at your wife does NOT make any sense.
     
    I think it is clear more than wolf whistling was involved. In particular doing it in private inside the store which would have made her watching the store untenable in the future.

    Does not make it right, but let's at least be honest about what seems to have happened.
    , @David In TN
    @Jack D

    Regarding the black exultation at the Not Guilty verdict for the obviously guilty O.J. Simpson, Nicholas Stix wrote that black support for Simpson was not due to doubt about his guilt, but the certainty of it.

    During the Simpson trial I worked at a place with a lot of black employees. Every one I talked to knew he was guilty but approved the verdict.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @Jack D, @Anon

  239. @AceDeuce
    @James N. Kennett


    Southerners put up those statues in the early 20th Century, to remind people who was boss. The proposed statue of Emmett Till serves the same purpose.

    General Lee opposed statues because he believed they got in the way of reconciliation. He was correct.
     

    Bullcrap about the Confederate statues. You're right about the negro molester Till statue.

    FYI: In "the early 20th Century", there were still thousands upon thousands of Union vets still alive, including a sizable number of wounded/maimed. Many of the vets were prominent in federal government. After Andrew Johnson and through McKinley, 30 years or so, Presidents were all Yankees and nearly every one was a Union Vet-several saw combat.

    There were thousands upon thousands of Northerners still mourning husbands, fathers, friends, brothers, and even sons.

    Evidently, those people, as well as the U.S. government, did not seriously try and prevent Southern states from putting up these monuments, made of marble and bronze--permanent ones.

    Those people, IMHO, had a say-so in the matter. They allowed it. Case closed. People like you and these other 2023 revisionist cucks can go whistle. Go drown yourself if you don't like them.

    Replies: @Jack D

    First of all, peak Confederate monument was many decades after the war. Maybe the 1920s IIRC? The United Daughters of the Confederacy was not formed until 1894, almost 30 years after the war was over. The UDC had a political agenda, not just to commemorate the war dead but to support the KKK and Jim Crow in the (then) present and the monuments served that agenda.

    2nd, it is an interesting question on why the North threw in the towel on Reconstruction. Immediately after the war they did all the right things – passed Constitutional Amendments, saw to it that blacks could vote, etc. and then at some point they just got tired of running an occupation and let the Taliban take over again. It would be interesting to think of an alternative history where the North did not just throw in the towel on Reconstruction. If Lincoln had lived it might have been different.

    Reconciliation was appropriate – Americans are reconciled with Japanese veterans of WWII but what was not appropriate was rolling back the promises made in the 14th Amendment.

    • Replies: @G. Poulin
    @Jack D

    Promises extracted at gunpoint in violation of settled principles of law. The 14th is unworthy of respect, has been a source of national ruin, and needs desperately to be flushed.

    , @Art Deco
    @Jack D

    First of all, peak Confederate monument was many decades after the war.
    ==
    The Civil War was passing from the realm of current affairs into history and the people who fought it were dying off.
    ==
    2nd, it is an interesting question on why the North threw in the towel on Reconstruction. Immediately after the war they did all the right things – passed Constitutional Amendments, saw to it that blacks could vote, etc. and then at some point they just got tired of running an occupation and let the Taliban take over again.
    ==
    Because making a thorough job of it would have required a lot of expense, and a great deal of institutional revision especially in regard to the relationship between the central government and more particular units. Compare the emancipation of the slaves in 1865 with the agrarian reconstruction in the Hapsburg dominions (1848-59). In the revision of the agrarian systems in Europe (1789-1906), the title to rustical lands went to the tiller. (Prussia was an exception). Now imagine what it would have taken funds and manpower to confiscate a portion of plantation holdings, to resettle some of the freedmen in the Plains, and to survey lands in both regions and write out proper titles. Imagine erecting a set of federal day schools, boarding schools, and agricultural extension programs for freedmen, financed in part by a special tax on the Southern states. Imagine establishing trusteeships over courts, prosecutors' offices, sheriff's departments.
    ==
    You realize in 1877, only about 2o% of the adult black population qualified as literate and many of them lived in the quondam free states. Generalized suffrage for freedman was never a capital idea. You needed to build conduits to improving black human capital first.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    , @rebel yell
    @Jack D


    First of all, peak Confederate monument was many decades after the war. Maybe the 1920s IIRC? The United Daughters of the Confederacy was not formed until 1894, almost 30 years after the war was over. The UDC had a political agenda, not just to commemorate the war dead but to support the KKK and Jim Crow in the (then) present and the monuments served that agenda.
     
    The Lincoln Memorial was built many decades after the war, in 1922. The sponsors had a political agenda - to unite the country, stir up patriotism during and after WW1, etc.

    Holocaust memorials have been built many decades after the war. The sponsors have a political agenda - to fortify support for Israel, etc.

    It's all so suspicious! Monuments being built decades too late! People organizing to build them! Implications for current politics! Oh my! Oh my!

    Replies: @Jack D

    , @res
    @Jack D


    it is an interesting question on why the North threw in the towel on Reconstruction.
     
    This simple explanation matches what I have read elsewhere.
    https://quizlet.com/23761939/chapter-17-18-flash-cards/

    Reconstruction ended in 1877 because of an event known as the Great Betrayal (res: less biased sources refer to it as the Compromise of 1877), wherein the government pulled federal troops out of state politics in the South, and ended the Reconstruction Era. "Through the Compromise, Republican Rutherford B. Hayes was awarded the White House over Democrat Samuel J. Tilden on the understanding that Hayes would remove the federal troops whose support was essential for the survival of Republican state governments in South Carolina, Florida and Louisiana. The compromise involved Democrats who controlled the House of Representatives allowing the decision of the Electoral Commission to take effect. The outgoing president, Republican Ulysses S. Grant, removed the soldiers from Florida. As president, Hayes removed the remaining troops in South Carolina and Louisiana. As soon as the troops left, many white Republicans also left and the "Redeemer" Democrats took control.
     
    Even shorter explanation: "politics."

    More on the 1876 election. 82.6% turnout!
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1876_United_States_presidential_election

    Interesting that Hayes was the means of Reconstruction ending given he seemed to mean well for blacks in general.
    https://www.battlefields.org/learn/biographies/rutherford-b-hayes

    Replies: @Wilkey, @G. Poulin

  240. @Jack D
    @res

    Political violence makes some sense on a certain level. If your goal is to prevent the blacks of MI from voting then killing a political organizer makes a certain amount of sense (and someone who does political organizing under a terror regime knows the risk that he is taking). If blacks were free to register to vote with impunity in MI then the people in power would have lost power (as indeed they did when the system broke down).

    Murdering a teenager for wolf whistling at your wife does NOT make any sense. Nor does it make any sense that the community shielded the bozos who did it just because they were white. The senselessness of the crime and the community response makes it more memorable. I don't think anyone here (especially those who are claiming that Till deserved it) would be happy with what happened if the races had been reversed. Basically the reverse situation was OJ killing Ron Goldman and no white person I know was happy about OJ's acquittal or thought that Ron deserved to be killed (well maybe the anti-Semites did).

    Ideally you want a system where justice is blind. Once you depart from the principle that justice should be administered regardless of race then it's only a matter of time before it comes back to bite you because you are never going to be able to hold the reins of power forever.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @res, @David In TN

    Murdering a teenager for wolf whistling at your wife does NOT make any sense. Nor does it make any sense that the community shielded the bozos who did it just because they were white.
    ==
    Bryant and Milam were put on trial and then acquitted. When the Look article came out, everyone on both sides of the color bar shunned them. They had to close their store within six months, no one would hire them, and no one would rent land to them. They had to leave town. The jury shielded them from a criminal penalty, but no one wanted them around. Harper Lee’s narrator in Too Kill a Mockingbird discusses this facially contradictory behavior in her fictional town.

    • Thanks: Pixo
  241. @Jack D
    @AceDeuce

    First of all, peak Confederate monument was many decades after the war. Maybe the 1920s IIRC? The United Daughters of the Confederacy was not formed until 1894, almost 30 years after the war was over. The UDC had a political agenda, not just to commemorate the war dead but to support the KKK and Jim Crow in the (then) present and the monuments served that agenda.

    2nd, it is an interesting question on why the North threw in the towel on Reconstruction. Immediately after the war they did all the right things - passed Constitutional Amendments, saw to it that blacks could vote, etc. and then at some point they just got tired of running an occupation and let the Taliban take over again. It would be interesting to think of an alternative history where the North did not just throw in the towel on Reconstruction. If Lincoln had lived it might have been different.

    Reconciliation was appropriate - Americans are reconciled with Japanese veterans of WWII but what was not appropriate was rolling back the promises made in the 14th Amendment.

    Replies: @G. Poulin, @Art Deco, @rebel yell, @res

    Promises extracted at gunpoint in violation of settled principles of law. The 14th is unworthy of respect, has been a source of national ruin, and needs desperately to be flushed.

  242. @res
    @Pixo

    Thanks. Link to that post.
    https://ubersoy.substack.com/p/jewish-involvement-in-racial-hereditarianism

    I did not go through his list in detail, but both Jensen and Eysenck are marginal cases.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Jensen#Early_life
    https://theconversation.com/why-did-britains-most-prominent-psychologist-deny-his-jewish-heritage-84875


    What sold me the most on the idea wasn’t so much as maxxing my children’s IQ, but avoiding a lower IQ child who doesn’t have any special defects, but just happens to be at the bottom of the expected range.
     
    Seems reasonable to me. I would be much more concerned with avoiding major negatives than attempting to max anything. Worth noting that Steve Hsu's company LifeView (formerly Genomic Prediction) specifically does not look for IQ or non-health phenotypic traits (e.g. height, eye/hair color, etc.). Their PGT-P test is closest to what we are discussing.
    https://lifeview.com/our_tests.html

    Article about PGT-P.
    https://www.timesofisrael.com/designer-babies-hi-tech-preimplantation-genetic-testing-may-soon-come-to-israel/

    Replies: @Pixo, @Pixo

    Lifeview has become a lot more cagey than when they were in initial startup mode. Probably for the best.

    The service you mention looks at known and spontaneous mutations in important parts of the genome, and probably is nearly at good at selecting for IQ as a pure IQ selection. And superior to pure IQ since eugenic selection has other components.

    I encouraged a friend with a 42yo wife who wanted one more kid to use lifeview under the assumption they’d need to do IVF, when their service is in my view a no-brainer. He ended up bypassing them the natural way too despite his wife’s age.

  243. @res
    @Pixo

    Thanks. Link to that post.
    https://ubersoy.substack.com/p/jewish-involvement-in-racial-hereditarianism

    I did not go through his list in detail, but both Jensen and Eysenck are marginal cases.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Jensen#Early_life
    https://theconversation.com/why-did-britains-most-prominent-psychologist-deny-his-jewish-heritage-84875


    What sold me the most on the idea wasn’t so much as maxxing my children’s IQ, but avoiding a lower IQ child who doesn’t have any special defects, but just happens to be at the bottom of the expected range.
     
    Seems reasonable to me. I would be much more concerned with avoiding major negatives than attempting to max anything. Worth noting that Steve Hsu's company LifeView (formerly Genomic Prediction) specifically does not look for IQ or non-health phenotypic traits (e.g. height, eye/hair color, etc.). Their PGT-P test is closest to what we are discussing.
    https://lifeview.com/our_tests.html

    Article about PGT-P.
    https://www.timesofisrael.com/designer-babies-hi-tech-preimplantation-genetic-testing-may-soon-come-to-israel/

    Replies: @Pixo, @Pixo

    “ LifeView (formerly Genomic Prediction) specifically does not look for IQ or non-health phenotypic traits (e.g. height, eye/hair color, etc.).”

    There’s at least two free websites that predict eye and hair color for free from genomes. It isn’t hard to get close to correct, especially eye color. There’s no need for LifeView to tell you this if you want a blond kid, the hard part is having a bunch of viable embryos sequenced.

    Their value-add is they are more currant than free sites on known SNPs and supposedly effectively use AI to predict the effect of unstudied mutations.

    • Replies: @res
    @Pixo

    I have used websites like that. So so accuracy for me. Do you know if LifeView provides SNP results to its clients?

    Replies: @Pixo

  244. @Jack D
    @AceDeuce

    First of all, peak Confederate monument was many decades after the war. Maybe the 1920s IIRC? The United Daughters of the Confederacy was not formed until 1894, almost 30 years after the war was over. The UDC had a political agenda, not just to commemorate the war dead but to support the KKK and Jim Crow in the (then) present and the monuments served that agenda.

    2nd, it is an interesting question on why the North threw in the towel on Reconstruction. Immediately after the war they did all the right things - passed Constitutional Amendments, saw to it that blacks could vote, etc. and then at some point they just got tired of running an occupation and let the Taliban take over again. It would be interesting to think of an alternative history where the North did not just throw in the towel on Reconstruction. If Lincoln had lived it might have been different.

    Reconciliation was appropriate - Americans are reconciled with Japanese veterans of WWII but what was not appropriate was rolling back the promises made in the 14th Amendment.

    Replies: @G. Poulin, @Art Deco, @rebel yell, @res

    First of all, peak Confederate monument was many decades after the war.
    ==
    The Civil War was passing from the realm of current affairs into history and the people who fought it were dying off.
    ==
    2nd, it is an interesting question on why the North threw in the towel on Reconstruction. Immediately after the war they did all the right things – passed Constitutional Amendments, saw to it that blacks could vote, etc. and then at some point they just got tired of running an occupation and let the Taliban take over again.
    ==
    Because making a thorough job of it would have required a lot of expense, and a great deal of institutional revision especially in regard to the relationship between the central government and more particular units. Compare the emancipation of the slaves in 1865 with the agrarian reconstruction in the Hapsburg dominions (1848-59). In the revision of the agrarian systems in Europe (1789-1906), the title to rustical lands went to the tiller. (Prussia was an exception). Now imagine what it would have taken funds and manpower to confiscate a portion of plantation holdings, to resettle some of the freedmen in the Plains, and to survey lands in both regions and write out proper titles. Imagine erecting a set of federal day schools, boarding schools, and agricultural extension programs for freedmen, financed in part by a special tax on the Southern states. Imagine establishing trusteeships over courts, prosecutors’ offices, sheriff’s departments.
    ==
    You realize in 1877, only about 2o% of the adult black population qualified as literate and many of them lived in the quondam free states. Generalized suffrage for freedman was never a capital idea. You needed to build conduits to improving black human capital first.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Art Deco


    You realize in 1877, only about 2o% of the adult black population qualified as literate and many of them lived in the quondam free states.
     
    Do you realize that Jack D does not consider being uninformed an obstacle to opining on historical matters?
  245. @Colin Wright
    @Jack D


    'This was not some random crime – a robbery gone wrong, a drunken bar brawl. The crime was only possible in the context of the Jim Crow system. His crime fundamentally was that he did not “know his place”. The killing was not just personal to Till and his family but was part and parcel of a system designed to keep blacks in their place at the bottom of a racial hierarchy. His killers were not punished for their crime because of this hierarchy. So to pretend that this had nothing to do with anyone or anything else is just false.'
     
    One wonders how you would handle living and working in a majority black area. How, for example, would you go about making sure your young wife could mind the store by herself?

    Emmitt Till's murder was definitely a beating that went sideways. But I can see how it happened. Read the Look Magazine article.

    Replies: @Corvinus, @nonentity

    Till committed a sexual assault effectively opening the way for further mayhem against the women who ran the isolated store. The only choice for the owners was to cut and run or to deal a blow that would be remembered. The planned beating certainly went sideways as anything like that could have, but to have done nothing would have been to sentence the women to much worse. What would you have done?

    • Agree: Colin Wright
  246. @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Jack D


    The idea is to bring blacks up to our level
     
    Literally impossible in the aggregate (barring pending artificial eugenic genetic modification tech). Therefore, in the current ‘safari society’, or open-air human zoo, jungle rules reasonably apply from time to time. No reason to get mopey about it.

    Here, this may cheer you up:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9M9Phvor3dg

    Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic

    Ironically, the Last White Decade.

  247. @Cagey Beast
    @Reg Cæsar

    Funny that a soldier's religion is not listed.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @fredyetagain aka superhonky

    Funny that a soldier’s religion is not listed.

    It’s on one’s dog tags. Evidently it only matters when he’s dead. Or needs a transfusion, or last rites.

  248. @Jack D
    @AceDeuce

    First of all, peak Confederate monument was many decades after the war. Maybe the 1920s IIRC? The United Daughters of the Confederacy was not formed until 1894, almost 30 years after the war was over. The UDC had a political agenda, not just to commemorate the war dead but to support the KKK and Jim Crow in the (then) present and the monuments served that agenda.

    2nd, it is an interesting question on why the North threw in the towel on Reconstruction. Immediately after the war they did all the right things - passed Constitutional Amendments, saw to it that blacks could vote, etc. and then at some point they just got tired of running an occupation and let the Taliban take over again. It would be interesting to think of an alternative history where the North did not just throw in the towel on Reconstruction. If Lincoln had lived it might have been different.

    Reconciliation was appropriate - Americans are reconciled with Japanese veterans of WWII but what was not appropriate was rolling back the promises made in the 14th Amendment.

    Replies: @G. Poulin, @Art Deco, @rebel yell, @res

    First of all, peak Confederate monument was many decades after the war. Maybe the 1920s IIRC? The United Daughters of the Confederacy was not formed until 1894, almost 30 years after the war was over. The UDC had a political agenda, not just to commemorate the war dead but to support the KKK and Jim Crow in the (then) present and the monuments served that agenda.

    The Lincoln Memorial was built many decades after the war, in 1922. The sponsors had a political agenda – to unite the country, stir up patriotism during and after WW1, etc.

    Holocaust memorials have been built many decades after the war. The sponsors have a political agenda – to fortify support for Israel, etc.

    It’s all so suspicious! Monuments being built decades too late! People organizing to build them! Implications for current politics! Oh my! Oh my!

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @rebel yell

    But some here have it that the Till "National Monument" (there won't be an actual statue - a "National Monument" is like a mini-National Park) is a cynical political gesture by Biden but the Confederate Statues were a pure expression of grief by the mourning widows of the South.

    Ultimately monuments are like dogs pissing on fire hydrants - a way of marking territory. This is why the Russians erected Lenins all over Eastern Europe. People love it when THEIR heroes are being commemorated and THEIR dead are remembered and not so much when it is someone else's.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @Kylie

  249. res says:
    @Jack D
    @res

    Political violence makes some sense on a certain level. If your goal is to prevent the blacks of MI from voting then killing a political organizer makes a certain amount of sense (and someone who does political organizing under a terror regime knows the risk that he is taking). If blacks were free to register to vote with impunity in MI then the people in power would have lost power (as indeed they did when the system broke down).

    Murdering a teenager for wolf whistling at your wife does NOT make any sense. Nor does it make any sense that the community shielded the bozos who did it just because they were white. The senselessness of the crime and the community response makes it more memorable. I don't think anyone here (especially those who are claiming that Till deserved it) would be happy with what happened if the races had been reversed. Basically the reverse situation was OJ killing Ron Goldman and no white person I know was happy about OJ's acquittal or thought that Ron deserved to be killed (well maybe the anti-Semites did).

    Ideally you want a system where justice is blind. Once you depart from the principle that justice should be administered regardless of race then it's only a matter of time before it comes back to bite you because you are never going to be able to hold the reins of power forever.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @res, @David In TN

    Political violence makes some sense on a certain level.

    Understood. For whatever reason I have less sympathy for it than for an “honor killing” in the heat of the moment. Perhaps because political violence tends to be systematic and done with forethought.

    Murdering a teenager for wolf whistling at your wife does NOT make any sense.

    I think it is clear more than wolf whistling was involved. In particular doing it in private inside the store which would have made her watching the store untenable in the future.

    Does not make it right, but let’s at least be honest about what seems to have happened.

    • Agree: Pastit
  250. res says:
    @Jack D
    @AceDeuce

    First of all, peak Confederate monument was many decades after the war. Maybe the 1920s IIRC? The United Daughters of the Confederacy was not formed until 1894, almost 30 years after the war was over. The UDC had a political agenda, not just to commemorate the war dead but to support the KKK and Jim Crow in the (then) present and the monuments served that agenda.

    2nd, it is an interesting question on why the North threw in the towel on Reconstruction. Immediately after the war they did all the right things - passed Constitutional Amendments, saw to it that blacks could vote, etc. and then at some point they just got tired of running an occupation and let the Taliban take over again. It would be interesting to think of an alternative history where the North did not just throw in the towel on Reconstruction. If Lincoln had lived it might have been different.

    Reconciliation was appropriate - Americans are reconciled with Japanese veterans of WWII but what was not appropriate was rolling back the promises made in the 14th Amendment.

    Replies: @G. Poulin, @Art Deco, @rebel yell, @res

    it is an interesting question on why the North threw in the towel on Reconstruction.

    This simple explanation matches what I have read elsewhere.
    https://quizlet.com/23761939/chapter-17-18-flash-cards/

    Reconstruction ended in 1877 because of an event known as the Great Betrayal (res: less biased sources refer to it as the Compromise of 1877), wherein the government pulled federal troops out of state politics in the South, and ended the Reconstruction Era. “Through the Compromise, Republican Rutherford B. Hayes was awarded the White House over Democrat Samuel J. Tilden on the understanding that Hayes would remove the federal troops whose support was essential for the survival of Republican state governments in South Carolina, Florida and Louisiana. The compromise involved Democrats who controlled the House of Representatives allowing the decision of the Electoral Commission to take effect. The outgoing president, Republican Ulysses S. Grant, removed the soldiers from Florida. As president, Hayes removed the remaining troops in South Carolina and Louisiana. As soon as the troops left, many white Republicans also left and the “Redeemer” Democrats took control.

    Even shorter explanation: “politics.”

    More on the 1876 election. 82.6% turnout!
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1876_United_States_presidential_election

    Interesting that Hayes was the means of Reconstruction ending given he seemed to mean well for blacks in general.
    https://www.battlefields.org/learn/biographies/rutherford-b-hayes

    • Replies: @Wilkey
    @res


    Interesting that Hayes was the means of Reconstruction ending given he seemed to mean well for blacks in general.
     
    Why would you assume that black political control would improve black welfare in the South in the 1870s when it does nothing for black welfare today - neither in the South, nor the rest of America, nor anywhere else in the world?

    Replies: @res

    , @G. Poulin
    @res

    Hayes was not your typical fanatic Yankee oppressor, willing to do anything and everything to remake society according to their fever dreams. He was, by all accounts, a good man and a decent President in spite of having been appointed rather than elected. Would that we could have had more Presidents like him.

  251. @Pixo
    @res

    “ LifeView (formerly Genomic Prediction) specifically does not look for IQ or non-health phenotypic traits (e.g. height, eye/hair color, etc.).”

    There’s at least two free websites that predict eye and hair color for free from genomes. It isn’t hard to get close to correct, especially eye color. There’s no need for LifeView to tell you this if you want a blond kid, the hard part is having a bunch of viable embryos sequenced.

    Their value-add is they are more currant than free sites on known SNPs and supposedly effectively use AI to predict the effect of unstudied mutations.

    Replies: @res

    I have used websites like that. So so accuracy for me. Do you know if LifeView provides SNP results to its clients?

    • Replies: @Pixo
    @res

    I think they just analyze results and partner with clinics to do the wet work and sequencing.

  252. @JohnnyWalker123
    https://twitter.com/AlecStapp/status/1682892275536343041

    Replies: @Wilkey

    The pandemic really is over — US death rate has returned to normal.

    Since COVID killed off hundreds of thousands of people mostly in their last few years of life, a true end to the pandemic would be death rates below normal, as there were people dying in 2020 who would otherwise have died in 2021-2023. There are people who aren’t around to die at age 84 this year because they died of COVID at age 82.

    But death rates haven’t gone below normal, which means people still dying of COVID and/or increases in other causes of death, like all of the new social ills we have to thank as a result of lockdowns, increased violence due to depolicing, or increased OD deaths thanks to all the drugs coming in across our unsecured border.

    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
    @Wilkey

    The excess deaths appear more likely the result of the injections (which arguably do not even qualify as “vaccines” under the definition used until 2021) than covid-19 and variants.

    No surprise if people continue to die prematurely — not just old infirm people — from the injections in 2023, 2024, and onward. This is especially true if the sheeple keep trooping out to “get boosted.” The injections make you more likely to become infected and more likely to be seriously unnecessarily impaired or die.

    For starters:

    https://kirschsubstack.com/p/is-the-cdc-totally-blind-to-all-the?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

    https://kirschsubstack.com/p/breaking-vaers-data-clearly-shows?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

    https://kirschsubstack.com/p/will-the-anti-anti-vaxxers-ever-acknowledge?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

    Love to see Unz debate Kirsch, in person or in a lengthy written exchange.

  253. @res
    @Jack D


    it is an interesting question on why the North threw in the towel on Reconstruction.
     
    This simple explanation matches what I have read elsewhere.
    https://quizlet.com/23761939/chapter-17-18-flash-cards/

    Reconstruction ended in 1877 because of an event known as the Great Betrayal (res: less biased sources refer to it as the Compromise of 1877), wherein the government pulled federal troops out of state politics in the South, and ended the Reconstruction Era. "Through the Compromise, Republican Rutherford B. Hayes was awarded the White House over Democrat Samuel J. Tilden on the understanding that Hayes would remove the federal troops whose support was essential for the survival of Republican state governments in South Carolina, Florida and Louisiana. The compromise involved Democrats who controlled the House of Representatives allowing the decision of the Electoral Commission to take effect. The outgoing president, Republican Ulysses S. Grant, removed the soldiers from Florida. As president, Hayes removed the remaining troops in South Carolina and Louisiana. As soon as the troops left, many white Republicans also left and the "Redeemer" Democrats took control.
     
    Even shorter explanation: "politics."

    More on the 1876 election. 82.6% turnout!
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1876_United_States_presidential_election

    Interesting that Hayes was the means of Reconstruction ending given he seemed to mean well for blacks in general.
    https://www.battlefields.org/learn/biographies/rutherford-b-hayes

    Replies: @Wilkey, @G. Poulin

    Interesting that Hayes was the means of Reconstruction ending given he seemed to mean well for blacks in general.

    Why would you assume that black political control would improve black welfare in the South in the 1870s when it does nothing for black welfare today – neither in the South, nor the rest of America, nor anywhere else in the world?

    • Replies: @res
    @Wilkey

    Interesting point. Whether or not I would think that I would expect an 1876 era northern Republican to think that. Do you know otherwise?

  254. Anonymous[320] • Disclaimer says:

    “One good thing is that demogdarogx Cheney is hapienyhand wgyires will soon be a minutely”

    That looks like Old English-are you Beowulf?

  255. Didn’t Till try to stab his step-father or something? Which led to him being sent to Mississippi? I’m sure that was a one time thing and totally not a violent pattern.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @Midnights

    His mother married a man named Pink Bradley in 1951. A Newsweek article indicates they separated in 1953, a couple of years before her son was killed.
    ==
    Her 3d marriage (in 1957) was to a man named Gene Mobley. It lasted 40-odd years, of which she was of child-bearing age for the first six. She never produced any children by Bradley or Mobley.

    , @res
    @Midnights

    Chapter 1 from EMMETT TILL The Murder That Shocked the World and Propelled the Civil Rights Movement by Dewey Anderson has something which is likely what you mean. Pages 16-17.
    https://www.upress.state.ms.us/content/download/120825/1469632/version/1/file/Emmett+Till+Ch.+1.pdf


    Pink came by the house soon after separating from Mamie, and Emmett, sick with the flu, heard Pink’s voice as he approached his room. Emmett, holding a butcher knife, met Pink at the doorway and threatened to stab him unless he left. Mamie stepped in, escorted Pink out of the house, and scolded Emmett for the dangerous thing he had just done. She saw some significance to the episode, however, as she and Emmett grew closer as a result. They even developed a partnership in running the household.
     
    , @Jack D
    @Midnights

    This is what BLM is ultimately all about and which apparently some white people don't get. Let's say that what you said was true (it isn't but less say that your wish to soil Till's name came true and he really was a true juvenile delinquent, a future criminal in training). Does this entitle whites, in advance of any capital crime, to discard him in the nearest pond like an abandoned washing machine? Does this mean that it was right to kill him?

    The answer is no. Even the most vile black filth deserves only to be tried in a court of law and punished for their actual deeds according to the law, up to and including execution if necessary (as Till's daddy was). The power of life and death is not granted to anyone except the State (except in rare circumstances such as self defense). Not to cops, not to vigilantes. Not in advance of any actual capital crime.

    The whole point of the elevation to sainthood of people who are otherwise worthless like George Floyd is that no human is truly worthless and that we are all equal in dignity before our Creator and before the law. IN SPITE of his overall worthlessness he was still a human being who did not deserve to die.

    Replies: @Pixo, @Art Deco

  256. @Anon
    This is just Bribe 'em thinking it's a simple way of holding onto the black vote. The economy's been going downhill, and Bribe 'em thinks blacks will easily fall in line if he gives them a Till monument.

    Well guess what? A long time ago, Democrats figured out that to blacks, pride is more important than money. Because most blacks are on welfare, food stamps, and Section 8, their basic financial needs are covered. They don't have to worry about starving or not having shelter. They don't even have to work. Therefore, what rouses blacks is their pride. A display like a Till monument, (along with a Democrat promise to keep those freebies coming) will always keep blacks voting Democratic.

    The only think that worries Democrats is if blacks become too apathetic to vote. Therefore, Democrats feel they need to keep reminding blacks of past wrongs to get them to the polls, much the way Democrats keep reminding Jews of the Holocaust to keep them going to the polls. Democrats are terrified that the minute voting blocs stop being reminded of ancient wrongs, they'll become apathetic about politics and stop voting Democrat.

    Replies: @Art Deco

    Because most blacks are on welfare, food stamps, and Section 8, their basic financial needs are covered.
    ==
    They’re not. About 2% are collecting TANF, about 25% are enrolled in SNAP, and about 10% are receiving some sort of subsidized housing.

  257. @Midnights
    Didn't Till try to stab his step-father or something? Which led to him being sent to Mississippi? I'm sure that was a one time thing and totally not a violent pattern.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @res, @Jack D

    His mother married a man named Pink Bradley in 1951. A Newsweek article indicates they separated in 1953, a couple of years before her son was killed.
    ==
    Her 3d marriage (in 1957) was to a man named Gene Mobley. It lasted 40-odd years, of which she was of child-bearing age for the first six. She never produced any children by Bradley or Mobley.

  258. @rebel yell
    @Jack D


    First of all, peak Confederate monument was many decades after the war. Maybe the 1920s IIRC? The United Daughters of the Confederacy was not formed until 1894, almost 30 years after the war was over. The UDC had a political agenda, not just to commemorate the war dead but to support the KKK and Jim Crow in the (then) present and the monuments served that agenda.
     
    The Lincoln Memorial was built many decades after the war, in 1922. The sponsors had a political agenda - to unite the country, stir up patriotism during and after WW1, etc.

    Holocaust memorials have been built many decades after the war. The sponsors have a political agenda - to fortify support for Israel, etc.

    It's all so suspicious! Monuments being built decades too late! People organizing to build them! Implications for current politics! Oh my! Oh my!

    Replies: @Jack D

    But some here have it that the Till “National Monument” (there won’t be an actual statue – a “National Monument” is like a mini-National Park) is a cynical political gesture by Biden but the Confederate Statues were a pure expression of grief by the mourning widows of the South.

    Ultimately monuments are like dogs pissing on fire hydrants – a way of marking territory. This is why the Russians erected Lenins all over Eastern Europe. People love it when THEIR heroes are being commemorated and THEIR dead are remembered and not so much when it is someone else’s.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @Jack D

    but the Confederate Statues were a pure expression of grief by the mourning widows of the South.
    ==
    Thanks for the caricature. We're all educated.
    ==

    Ultimately monuments are like dogs pissing on fire hydrants – a way of marking territory.
    ==
    Every once in a while you cannot help yourself and say something unintentionally revealing.

    , @Kylie
    @Jack D

    "But some here have it that the Till 'National Monument' (there won’t be an actual statue – a 'National Monument' is like a mini-National Park) is a cynical political gesture by Biden but the Confederate Statues were a pure expression of grief by the mourning widows of the South."

    Going by Biden's own words and actions back when he was capable of what passed with him
    as coherent thought, it's reasonable to conclude that the Till monument is [yet another] cynical political gesture by him.

    A James Byrd, Jr. monument would have genuine moral and national significance. But that's not what the left wants.

    Replies: @Art Deco

  259. @JohnnyWalker123
    This is how a serious country functions.

    https://twitter.com/dom_lucre/status/1683331585850867712

    Replies: @Jack D

    This is how a serious country functions.

    I don’t get it. A serious country functions by publishing stories from 6 years ago? A serious country functions by banning free speech? A serious country functions by outlawing LGBT content and then backing off when people object?

    I understand that there is a wish or a desire to hold up some other place (Russia, China) as places that are STRONK and not shit shows like America but those mythical STRONK places don’t really exist – they’ve got their own problems.

  260. @Jack D
    @rebel yell

    But some here have it that the Till "National Monument" (there won't be an actual statue - a "National Monument" is like a mini-National Park) is a cynical political gesture by Biden but the Confederate Statues were a pure expression of grief by the mourning widows of the South.

    Ultimately monuments are like dogs pissing on fire hydrants - a way of marking territory. This is why the Russians erected Lenins all over Eastern Europe. People love it when THEIR heroes are being commemorated and THEIR dead are remembered and not so much when it is someone else's.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @Kylie

    but the Confederate Statues were a pure expression of grief by the mourning widows of the South.
    ==
    Thanks for the caricature. We’re all educated.
    ==

    Ultimately monuments are like dogs pissing on fire hydrants – a way of marking territory.
    ==
    Every once in a while you cannot help yourself and say something unintentionally revealing.

  261. @AndrewR
    It will be torn down one day just like they tore down our statues

    Replies: @Evan drince

    I hope I live to see that day.

  262. @Wilkey
    @res


    Interesting that Hayes was the means of Reconstruction ending given he seemed to mean well for blacks in general.
     
    Why would you assume that black political control would improve black welfare in the South in the 1870s when it does nothing for black welfare today - neither in the South, nor the rest of America, nor anywhere else in the world?

    Replies: @res

    Interesting point. Whether or not I would think that I would expect an 1876 era northern Republican to think that. Do you know otherwise?

  263. res says:
    @Midnights
    Didn't Till try to stab his step-father or something? Which led to him being sent to Mississippi? I'm sure that was a one time thing and totally not a violent pattern.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @res, @Jack D

    Chapter 1 from EMMETT TILL The Murder That Shocked the World and Propelled the Civil Rights Movement by Dewey Anderson has something which is likely what you mean. Pages 16-17.
    https://www.upress.state.ms.us/content/download/120825/1469632/version/1/file/Emmett+Till+Ch.+1.pdf

    Pink came by the house soon after separating from Mamie, and Emmett, sick with the flu, heard Pink’s voice as he approached his room. Emmett, holding a butcher knife, met Pink at the doorway and threatened to stab him unless he left. Mamie stepped in, escorted Pink out of the house, and scolded Emmett for the dangerous thing he had just done. She saw some significance to the episode, however, as she and Emmett grew closer as a result. They even developed a partnership in running the household.

  264. @Jack D
    @Jenner Ickham Errican


    the Law of the Jungle applied to unrepentant jungle behavior.
     
    I understand that Blacks have no agency but I thought that white people are supposed to be better than that.

    I would have liked for young Emmett to be tried and convicted according to law for his crimes if any. There was some accusation that he groped or touched Bryant and didn't just make suggestive remarks. If this could have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt then as a teenage 1st offender the proper sentence would have probably been probation and counseling. If he was just mouthing off to her, that's not a crime at all. We don't executed people for "pre-crime" like in some science fiction movie. We don't live in a jungle.

    Taking jungle people and putting them in a civilized environment is problematic, which is why it shouldn't have been done in the 1st place. But once it is done, if you operate according to jungle principles that means that you have lost the battle. The idea is to bring blacks up to our level, not to descend to theirs.

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Art Deco, @Kylie, @Alden

    Americans have been trying to bring blacks up to semi civilized for 400 years. Hasn’t worked. I remember when the liberal idiot cure for black violence and retardation in public schools was to hire illiterate blacks as teachers administrators superintendents if huge systems like NYC Atlanta Los Angeles Chicago. Didn’t work the blacks are even more wild and violent than they were in 1960s when the stupid idea of illiterate blacks running the public schools began under that race traitor President Kennedy and his attorney general brother another race traitor.

    It hasn’t worked. Your idea that Whites are required to civilize the blacks sounds like a missionary catholic nun. Saint Jacqueline martyred in the Congo by blacks as she clutched a rosary in her hands. Forgiving them for killing her. And begging God to forgive them too.

    If you love blacks do much why didn’t you and your family live in a mixed race “ changing” neighborhood in Philadelphia ?

    750 thousand White men killed each other. Another 50 to 60 thousand civilians White and black died of malnutrition and other effects of war; especially in the border states. The south east plunged into 100 years of poverty and malnutrition.

    That did accomplish something. The black slaves became freemen.

    From about 1920 to the present, the great and good oh so virtuous Whites communists Quakers jews WASPs Irish like the Kennedys and other race traitors turned the nation upside down and inside out to civilize the violent retards.

    The result was the Saint Fentanyl Floyd riots the lives of the police who arrested him ruined and 18 months of riots billions of dollars worth of damage and our great cities destroyed.

    • Agree: AceDeuce
  265. @Midnights
    Didn't Till try to stab his step-father or something? Which led to him being sent to Mississippi? I'm sure that was a one time thing and totally not a violent pattern.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @res, @Jack D

    This is what BLM is ultimately all about and which apparently some white people don’t get. Let’s say that what you said was true (it isn’t but less say that your wish to soil Till’s name came true and he really was a true juvenile delinquent, a future criminal in training). Does this entitle whites, in advance of any capital crime, to discard him in the nearest pond like an abandoned washing machine? Does this mean that it was right to kill him?

    The answer is no. Even the most vile black filth deserves only to be tried in a court of law and punished for their actual deeds according to the law, up to and including execution if necessary (as Till’s daddy was). The power of life and death is not granted to anyone except the State (except in rare circumstances such as self defense). Not to cops, not to vigilantes. Not in advance of any actual capital crime.

    The whole point of the elevation to sainthood of people who are otherwise worthless like George Floyd is that no human is truly worthless and that we are all equal in dignity before our Creator and before the law. IN SPITE of his overall worthlessness he was still a human being who did not deserve to die.

    • Replies: @Pixo
    @Jack D

    This happy universalism is touching, but will and is causing the destruction of civilization and degradation of the human race.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @Jack D

    , @Art Deco
    @Jack D

    Actually, BLM trades on the objection of people who fancy themselves high status being compelled to submit to the authority of people they regard as low status. Floyd died of an overdose of fentanyl, btw.

    Replies: @Jack D

  266. @res
    @Pixo

    I have used websites like that. So so accuracy for me. Do you know if LifeView provides SNP results to its clients?

    Replies: @Pixo

    I think they just analyze results and partner with clinics to do the wet work and sequencing.

  267. @Jack D
    @Midnights

    This is what BLM is ultimately all about and which apparently some white people don't get. Let's say that what you said was true (it isn't but less say that your wish to soil Till's name came true and he really was a true juvenile delinquent, a future criminal in training). Does this entitle whites, in advance of any capital crime, to discard him in the nearest pond like an abandoned washing machine? Does this mean that it was right to kill him?

    The answer is no. Even the most vile black filth deserves only to be tried in a court of law and punished for their actual deeds according to the law, up to and including execution if necessary (as Till's daddy was). The power of life and death is not granted to anyone except the State (except in rare circumstances such as self defense). Not to cops, not to vigilantes. Not in advance of any actual capital crime.

    The whole point of the elevation to sainthood of people who are otherwise worthless like George Floyd is that no human is truly worthless and that we are all equal in dignity before our Creator and before the law. IN SPITE of his overall worthlessness he was still a human being who did not deserve to die.

    Replies: @Pixo, @Art Deco

    This happy universalism is touching, but will and is causing the destruction of civilization and degradation of the human race.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @Pixo

    It will do nothing of the kind. The problem in re Floyd is the willingness to send scapegoats to prison (in a half dozen other cases as well, starting with the McMichaels).
    ==
    (The Till defendants deserved to rot in a Mississippi prison for 20+ years before being considered for a parole hearing. Till himself might or might not have merited a common assault the next time Bryant and Milam caught sight of him).

    , @Jack D
    @Pixo

    America bought itself a permanent problem when it imported people from the Dark Continent for forced labor. Africa is much closer to Europe and yet there was never such a practice. The Romans would import lions and other beasts to Rome for entertainment but they knew not to bring blacks as cheap labor.

    This is the circle that will never be squared. OTOH, blacks are fully human and yet OTOH their behavior and intelligence are a notch lower than whites on average (with considerable overlap but enough offset in the lower tail to make them permanent problems). Shoulda picked your own cotton. America (whether or not we declare formal "reparations") will be paying for this until the end of time.

    Replies: @Pixo, @Jenner Ickham Errican

  268. @Jack D
    @Midnights

    This is what BLM is ultimately all about and which apparently some white people don't get. Let's say that what you said was true (it isn't but less say that your wish to soil Till's name came true and he really was a true juvenile delinquent, a future criminal in training). Does this entitle whites, in advance of any capital crime, to discard him in the nearest pond like an abandoned washing machine? Does this mean that it was right to kill him?

    The answer is no. Even the most vile black filth deserves only to be tried in a court of law and punished for their actual deeds according to the law, up to and including execution if necessary (as Till's daddy was). The power of life and death is not granted to anyone except the State (except in rare circumstances such as self defense). Not to cops, not to vigilantes. Not in advance of any actual capital crime.

    The whole point of the elevation to sainthood of people who are otherwise worthless like George Floyd is that no human is truly worthless and that we are all equal in dignity before our Creator and before the law. IN SPITE of his overall worthlessness he was still a human being who did not deserve to die.

    Replies: @Pixo, @Art Deco

    Actually, BLM trades on the objection of people who fancy themselves high status being compelled to submit to the authority of people they regard as low status. Floyd died of an overdose of fentanyl, btw.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Art Deco

    There are two things going on here. Floyd HIMSELF refused to submit to lawful authority and this (plus the fentanyl) had a hand in his own death.

    This is separate from the meaning of BLM. Yes, those who end up dead at the hands of the police are mostly POSs and part of being a black POS is apparently considering the police not to have lawful authority (to the extent that what they are doing involves "consideration" at all - sometime my dog did not want to go into its crate but I wouldn't have called such refusal "consideration"). In fact if you consider folks like Floyd as if they were uncomprehending animals, they are STILL deserving of humane treatment. When my dog refused to be crated, I did not go after her with a tire iron.

    Obviously Chauvin and his fellow officers were scapegoats as you say, but this does not make them innocents either. Just as Till did not deserve death for what he did, neither did Chauvin deserve a life sentence. But they both deserved some sort of punishment. Gladly, Chauvin is still alive and one can hope (or at least pray) that someday America will regain its senses and his sentence will be reduced to a more reasonable term in light of his crime.

    And yes there was a crime. Chauvin's restraint at some point became unreasonable when it became clear that Floyd was no longer breathing. It may have started as a reasonable restraint but at some point it became unreasonable. Certainly the fentanyl contributed but if Floyd had not been restrained in that fashion he probably would not have died. A few years for negligent homicide would have been fair. Mohammed Noor, the Somali cop who shot the white woman who called 911, got 57 months which I assume will be less with time off for good behavior.

    Replies: @Art Deco

  269. @Jack D
    @rebel yell

    But some here have it that the Till "National Monument" (there won't be an actual statue - a "National Monument" is like a mini-National Park) is a cynical political gesture by Biden but the Confederate Statues were a pure expression of grief by the mourning widows of the South.

    Ultimately monuments are like dogs pissing on fire hydrants - a way of marking territory. This is why the Russians erected Lenins all over Eastern Europe. People love it when THEIR heroes are being commemorated and THEIR dead are remembered and not so much when it is someone else's.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @Kylie

    “But some here have it that the Till ‘National Monument’ (there won’t be an actual statue – a ‘National Monument’ is like a mini-National Park) is a cynical political gesture by Biden but the Confederate Statues were a pure expression of grief by the mourning widows of the South.”

    Going by Biden’s own words and actions back when he was capable of what passed with him
    as coherent thought, it’s reasonable to conclude that the Till monument is [yet another] cynical political gesture by him.

    A James Byrd, Jr. monument would have genuine moral and national significance. But that’s not what the left wants.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @Kylie

    Mr. Byrd was a crime victim. His assailants killed him in an unbelievably gruesome manner. However, he was, like the rest of us, a private citizen. His monument should be in the cemetery, there for his family.

  270. @Pixo
    @Jack D

    This happy universalism is touching, but will and is causing the destruction of civilization and degradation of the human race.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @Jack D

    It will do nothing of the kind. The problem in re Floyd is the willingness to send scapegoats to prison (in a half dozen other cases as well, starting with the McMichaels).
    ==
    (The Till defendants deserved to rot in a Mississippi prison for 20+ years before being considered for a parole hearing. Till himself might or might not have merited a common assault the next time Bryant and Milam caught sight of him).

  271. @Peter Frankfurter
    I propose a national holiday. How about "Till Tuesday"?

    Replies: @tyrone, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Wilkey, @Dr. Krieger

    He wants me
    But only part of the time

    He wants me
    If he can keep me in line

  272. @res
    @Jack D


    it is an interesting question on why the North threw in the towel on Reconstruction.
     
    This simple explanation matches what I have read elsewhere.
    https://quizlet.com/23761939/chapter-17-18-flash-cards/

    Reconstruction ended in 1877 because of an event known as the Great Betrayal (res: less biased sources refer to it as the Compromise of 1877), wherein the government pulled federal troops out of state politics in the South, and ended the Reconstruction Era. "Through the Compromise, Republican Rutherford B. Hayes was awarded the White House over Democrat Samuel J. Tilden on the understanding that Hayes would remove the federal troops whose support was essential for the survival of Republican state governments in South Carolina, Florida and Louisiana. The compromise involved Democrats who controlled the House of Representatives allowing the decision of the Electoral Commission to take effect. The outgoing president, Republican Ulysses S. Grant, removed the soldiers from Florida. As president, Hayes removed the remaining troops in South Carolina and Louisiana. As soon as the troops left, many white Republicans also left and the "Redeemer" Democrats took control.
     
    Even shorter explanation: "politics."

    More on the 1876 election. 82.6% turnout!
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1876_United_States_presidential_election

    Interesting that Hayes was the means of Reconstruction ending given he seemed to mean well for blacks in general.
    https://www.battlefields.org/learn/biographies/rutherford-b-hayes

    Replies: @Wilkey, @G. Poulin

    Hayes was not your typical fanatic Yankee oppressor, willing to do anything and everything to remake society according to their fever dreams. He was, by all accounts, a good man and a decent President in spite of having been appointed rather than elected. Would that we could have had more Presidents like him.

  273. @Robertson
    A young Latino woman that was 21 years old was shot recently by a 15 year old black kid while sitting in the passenger seat of her car in a Nashville Apartment complex. It was an attempted carjacking. Her name was Genesis Garcia. She wanted to be a pharmacist.

    Are there going to be any statues built for Genesis Garcia?

    Jesus pointed out to the Pharisees how they'd pick a gnat out of their brother's eye and ignore a camel in their own eye. The Biggest Lies I've ever seen in my life over the years are actually truths, but they are over emphasized out of all reasonable proportion. A molehill literally made out to be a mountain.

    Joe Biden is damaging the Biden family name to the point that their descendants are going to be ashamed of it. John Allen Muhammad and Boyd Lee Malvo killed 10 innocent people as "The Beltway Snipers", but white people wisely do not want to build statues of the 10 victims to stir up racial resentment against black folks, but see that justice was done and move on together. I think most blacks probably don't think this monument is a good idea. The powers-that-be want that psyop narrative badly don't they? Tell me how that military recruiting is going again?

    Replies: @Colin Wright, @HallParvey

    Joe Biden is damaging the Biden family name

    Impossible.

  274. @Kylie
    @Jack D

    "But some here have it that the Till 'National Monument' (there won’t be an actual statue – a 'National Monument' is like a mini-National Park) is a cynical political gesture by Biden but the Confederate Statues were a pure expression of grief by the mourning widows of the South."

    Going by Biden's own words and actions back when he was capable of what passed with him
    as coherent thought, it's reasonable to conclude that the Till monument is [yet another] cynical political gesture by him.

    A James Byrd, Jr. monument would have genuine moral and national significance. But that's not what the left wants.

    Replies: @Art Deco

    Mr. Byrd was a crime victim. His assailants killed him in an unbelievably gruesome manner. However, he was, like the rest of us, a private citizen. His monument should be in the cemetery, there for his family.

  275. @Art Deco
    @Jack D

    Actually, BLM trades on the objection of people who fancy themselves high status being compelled to submit to the authority of people they regard as low status. Floyd died of an overdose of fentanyl, btw.

    Replies: @Jack D

    There are two things going on here. Floyd HIMSELF refused to submit to lawful authority and this (plus the fentanyl) had a hand in his own death.

    This is separate from the meaning of BLM. Yes, those who end up dead at the hands of the police are mostly POSs and part of being a black POS is apparently considering the police not to have lawful authority (to the extent that what they are doing involves “consideration” at all – sometime my dog did not want to go into its crate but I wouldn’t have called such refusal “consideration”). In fact if you consider folks like Floyd as if they were uncomprehending animals, they are STILL deserving of humane treatment. When my dog refused to be crated, I did not go after her with a tire iron.

    Obviously Chauvin and his fellow officers were scapegoats as you say, but this does not make them innocents either. Just as Till did not deserve death for what he did, neither did Chauvin deserve a life sentence. But they both deserved some sort of punishment. Gladly, Chauvin is still alive and one can hope (or at least pray) that someday America will regain its senses and his sentence will be reduced to a more reasonable term in light of his crime.

    And yes there was a crime. Chauvin’s restraint at some point became unreasonable when it became clear that Floyd was no longer breathing. It may have started as a reasonable restraint but at some point it became unreasonable. Certainly the fentanyl contributed but if Floyd had not been restrained in that fashion he probably would not have died. A few years for negligent homicide would have been fair. Mohammed Noor, the Somali cop who shot the white woman who called 911, got 57 months which I assume will be less with time off for good behavior.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @Jack D

    This is separate from the meaning of BLM.
    ==
    It isn't. The objection was that Floyd was detained in a humiliating position. He was in that position because he'd been bouncing off the walls in the vehicle.
    ==
    Chauvin’s restraint at some point became unreasonable when it became clear that Floyd was no longer breathing
    ==
    It didn't. Floyd stopped breathing because he'd taken an overdose of fentanyl. He was 'restrained' by being laid on the ground. Chauvin's knee kept him from moving but did not depress his trachea. Chauvin and the other officers had called the ambulance, which arrived late because the driver had gone to the wrong address. Neither Chauvin nor the other officers had any narcan which might have functioned to revive Floyd.
    ==
    Note, the facial supposition of BLM is that blacks are treated violently by whites. This is nonsense. There are about 800 homicides in this country which feature a black victim and a non-black perpetrator, out of the 16,000 homicides a year with which the country was graced prior to 2020. An abnormally high number of them are justifiable. The objection is that police and private citizens can use lethal force against threatening blacks.

  276. @Pixo
    @Jack D

    This happy universalism is touching, but will and is causing the destruction of civilization and degradation of the human race.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @Jack D

    America bought itself a permanent problem when it imported people from the Dark Continent for forced labor. Africa is much closer to Europe and yet there was never such a practice. The Romans would import lions and other beasts to Rome for entertainment but they knew not to bring blacks as cheap labor.

    This is the circle that will never be squared. OTOH, blacks are fully human and yet OTOH their behavior and intelligence are a notch lower than whites on average (with considerable overlap but enough offset in the lower tail to make them permanent problems). Shoulda picked your own cotton. America (whether or not we declare formal “reparations”) will be paying for this until the end of time.

    • Replies: @Pixo
    @Jack D

    That’s not a defense of your Till white-knighting.

    , @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Jack D


    Shoulda picked your own cotton. America (whether or not we declare formal “reparations”) will be paying for this until the end of time.
     
    Like your ancestors who were ironically blindsided (shmart Ashkenazim! lol) by Hitler and friends, you lack imagination. Must be genetic. Don’t be so glib about what you think the future holds; your Shoah’d relatives made the same mistake. Mr. Sailer has a prudent watchword: The Future Is Unwritten.

    Replies: @Jack D

  277. @Jack D
    @Art Deco

    There are two things going on here. Floyd HIMSELF refused to submit to lawful authority and this (plus the fentanyl) had a hand in his own death.

    This is separate from the meaning of BLM. Yes, those who end up dead at the hands of the police are mostly POSs and part of being a black POS is apparently considering the police not to have lawful authority (to the extent that what they are doing involves "consideration" at all - sometime my dog did not want to go into its crate but I wouldn't have called such refusal "consideration"). In fact if you consider folks like Floyd as if they were uncomprehending animals, they are STILL deserving of humane treatment. When my dog refused to be crated, I did not go after her with a tire iron.

    Obviously Chauvin and his fellow officers were scapegoats as you say, but this does not make them innocents either. Just as Till did not deserve death for what he did, neither did Chauvin deserve a life sentence. But they both deserved some sort of punishment. Gladly, Chauvin is still alive and one can hope (or at least pray) that someday America will regain its senses and his sentence will be reduced to a more reasonable term in light of his crime.

    And yes there was a crime. Chauvin's restraint at some point became unreasonable when it became clear that Floyd was no longer breathing. It may have started as a reasonable restraint but at some point it became unreasonable. Certainly the fentanyl contributed but if Floyd had not been restrained in that fashion he probably would not have died. A few years for negligent homicide would have been fair. Mohammed Noor, the Somali cop who shot the white woman who called 911, got 57 months which I assume will be less with time off for good behavior.

    Replies: @Art Deco

    This is separate from the meaning of BLM.
    ==
    It isn’t. The objection was that Floyd was detained in a humiliating position. He was in that position because he’d been bouncing off the walls in the vehicle.
    ==
    Chauvin’s restraint at some point became unreasonable when it became clear that Floyd was no longer breathing
    ==
    It didn’t. Floyd stopped breathing because he’d taken an overdose of fentanyl. He was ‘restrained’ by being laid on the ground. Chauvin’s knee kept him from moving but did not depress his trachea. Chauvin and the other officers had called the ambulance, which arrived late because the driver had gone to the wrong address. Neither Chauvin nor the other officers had any narcan which might have functioned to revive Floyd.
    ==
    Note, the facial supposition of BLM is that blacks are treated violently by whites. This is nonsense. There are about 800 homicides in this country which feature a black victim and a non-black perpetrator, out of the 16,000 homicides a year with which the country was graced prior to 2020. An abnormally high number of them are justifiable. The objection is that police and private citizens can use lethal force against threatening blacks.

    • Agree: Pixo
  278. @Jack D
    @Anonymous Jew

    Murders of whites in S. Africa are also way up, but maintaining a system of minority rule by terror is unsustainable in the long run. Whites in the American South drew the wrong lesson after Haiti - they should have put their Africans back on a boat instead of doubling down on permanent rule by terror. Anything short of that was just kicking the can down the road .

    Replies: @Prester John, @Ennui, @Art Deco, @fredyetagain aka superhonky

    Whites in the American South drew the wrong lesson after Haiti – they should have put their Africans back on a boat instead of doubling down on permanent rule by terror. Anything short of that was just kicking the can down the road.

    Jack, you’ve written a lot of truly monumentally stupid things here regarding this emmett till issue, but except for your “rule by terror” histrionics, you’ve actually made a good point above. Too bad the boat solution you mentioned was never implemented; it would have saved a lot of innocent White suffering at the hands of feral, sadistic blacks.
    Oh and btw, both till and your co-ethnic leo frank got exactly what they deserved.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @fredyetagain aka superhonky


    Oh and btw, both till and your co-ethnic leo frank got exactly what they deserved.
     
    I disagree but what is really important is not that they got what they deserved but the process. Our legal system is carefully calibrated to protect the rights of the innocent. Benjamin Franklin phrased it thusly:

    "it is better 100 guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer"

    This is especially true in case of capital punishment where there is no going back.

    Mob justice does not operate by this principle. Sometimes the mob gets it right and sometimes it gets it wrong. Even when it gets it right, it is purely by luck because there is no real process to determine guilt, just mob sentiment. And if it get it wrong? Oops. Sorry.

    Frank's guilt is still debated but at least you could say that the punishment fit the crime IF he was guilty. In Till's case, even assuming the worst version of what he allegedly did, death was not the appropriate penalty and it's ridiculous that you think that it is. If Till had been a 14 year old white boy there's no way on earth you would think that he "got what he deserved".

    Replies: @David In TN, @fredyetagain aka superhonky, @Colin Wright

    , @Art Deco
    @fredyetagain aka superhonky

    About 400,000 blacks were imported from west Africa over a period of shy of 200 years. No, it was never a practical idea to load 4,000,000 English-speaking blacks onto boats and dump them on the west African coast where they were strangers to every aspect of African life.
    ==
    Note, prior to 1865, non-negroid populations were confined to the temperate and subtropical zones in Africa, except for some coastal trading posts. The disease environment of the interior made it a death sentence to venture there.

  279. @Jack D
    @Pixo

    America bought itself a permanent problem when it imported people from the Dark Continent for forced labor. Africa is much closer to Europe and yet there was never such a practice. The Romans would import lions and other beasts to Rome for entertainment but they knew not to bring blacks as cheap labor.

    This is the circle that will never be squared. OTOH, blacks are fully human and yet OTOH their behavior and intelligence are a notch lower than whites on average (with considerable overlap but enough offset in the lower tail to make them permanent problems). Shoulda picked your own cotton. America (whether or not we declare formal "reparations") will be paying for this until the end of time.

    Replies: @Pixo, @Jenner Ickham Errican

    That’s not a defense of your Till white-knighting.

  280. @Jack D
    @Kylie

    The reason I've gone to bat for him is some people here seem to have the notion that executing Till for whistling at a while woman was fitting punishment. To me this sounds insane. If that was the culture of the South (at it wasn't) then that culture would have been insane also.

    Replies: @William Badwhite

    The reason I’ve gone to bat for him is some people here seem to have the notion that executing Till for whistling at a while woman was fitting punishment.

    Again with the half-truths Jack. Jenner got on you for this earlier in the thread, yet you persist with your pervasive dishonesty. He wasn’t “executed” for “whistling”. You know this of course, which makes you a liar, not merely wrong.

    Now onto your usual form of lying – restate something that someone wrote (“so what you are saying is…”) while leaving out some things, sneaking in other things, then arguing with that straw man instead of what the other person actually wrote:

    Provide at least two citations to support your assertion that “some people here seem to have the notion that executing Till for whistling at a while woman was fitting punishment”.

    Just kidding, we all know nobody wrote that and this was just another lie.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @William Badwhite

    In #143, Jenner said:


    He certainly deserved death in a ‘Darwin awards’ sense: play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Emmett Till deserves zero sympathy.
     
    I would take that to mean exactly what I said.

    Replies: @res

  281. @Jack D
    @res

    Political violence makes some sense on a certain level. If your goal is to prevent the blacks of MI from voting then killing a political organizer makes a certain amount of sense (and someone who does political organizing under a terror regime knows the risk that he is taking). If blacks were free to register to vote with impunity in MI then the people in power would have lost power (as indeed they did when the system broke down).

    Murdering a teenager for wolf whistling at your wife does NOT make any sense. Nor does it make any sense that the community shielded the bozos who did it just because they were white. The senselessness of the crime and the community response makes it more memorable. I don't think anyone here (especially those who are claiming that Till deserved it) would be happy with what happened if the races had been reversed. Basically the reverse situation was OJ killing Ron Goldman and no white person I know was happy about OJ's acquittal or thought that Ron deserved to be killed (well maybe the anti-Semites did).

    Ideally you want a system where justice is blind. Once you depart from the principle that justice should be administered regardless of race then it's only a matter of time before it comes back to bite you because you are never going to be able to hold the reins of power forever.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @res, @David In TN

    Regarding the black exultation at the Not Guilty verdict for the obviously guilty O.J. Simpson, Nicholas Stix wrote that black support for Simpson was not due to doubt about his guilt, but the certainty of it.

    During the Simpson trial I worked at a place with a lot of black employees. Every one I talked to knew he was guilty but approved the verdict.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @David In TN

    I think there were some people like Stanley Crouch who thought Mark Fuhrman's recorded remarks had discredited the chain-of-custody.
    ==
    I'll wager there were others who thought the behavior of Nicole Brown (poaching a high income black man, then separating from him with considerable eclat), Ronald Goldman (being in the company of OJ's estranged wife and also defending himself), and Mark Fuhrman (uttering insults and slurs on a journalist's cassette) were 'disrespectful' and thus he authorities needed to be taught a lesson.

    Replies: @David In TN

    , @Jack D
    @David In TN

    Yes, when it comes to matters of race a lot of things that are seemingly paradoxical are not once you analyze them thru the racial lens. Simpson's acquittal was cheered BECAUSE he was guilty. Floyd was lionized BECAUSE he was a POS. Chauvin was imprisoned BECAUSE he was innocent. It's all seen as evening the score after 400 years of being on the short end of the stick.

    Blacks figure that there's a long way to go before the score will be even. On one level, $5 million a head or whatever they are asking for reparations is insane but OTOH, the amount (and the rampant looting at any opportunity) is a clue to how badly they feel cheated. Now you may say that this too is insane, that their ancestors being put on that boat is the luckiest thing that ever happened to American blacks. But the heart has its own calculus.

    Replies: @David In TN, @res

    , @Anon
    @David In TN


    During the Simpson trial I worked at a place with a lot of black employees. Every one I talked to knew he was guilty but approved the verdict.
     
    Why? Why did they approve the verdict?

    Replies: @David In TN, @Big P

  282. Anonymous[143] • Disclaimer says:
    @Art Deco
    @Jack D

    First of all, peak Confederate monument was many decades after the war.
    ==
    The Civil War was passing from the realm of current affairs into history and the people who fought it were dying off.
    ==
    2nd, it is an interesting question on why the North threw in the towel on Reconstruction. Immediately after the war they did all the right things – passed Constitutional Amendments, saw to it that blacks could vote, etc. and then at some point they just got tired of running an occupation and let the Taliban take over again.
    ==
    Because making a thorough job of it would have required a lot of expense, and a great deal of institutional revision especially in regard to the relationship between the central government and more particular units. Compare the emancipation of the slaves in 1865 with the agrarian reconstruction in the Hapsburg dominions (1848-59). In the revision of the agrarian systems in Europe (1789-1906), the title to rustical lands went to the tiller. (Prussia was an exception). Now imagine what it would have taken funds and manpower to confiscate a portion of plantation holdings, to resettle some of the freedmen in the Plains, and to survey lands in both regions and write out proper titles. Imagine erecting a set of federal day schools, boarding schools, and agricultural extension programs for freedmen, financed in part by a special tax on the Southern states. Imagine establishing trusteeships over courts, prosecutors' offices, sheriff's departments.
    ==
    You realize in 1877, only about 2o% of the adult black population qualified as literate and many of them lived in the quondam free states. Generalized suffrage for freedman was never a capital idea. You needed to build conduits to improving black human capital first.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    You realize in 1877, only about 2o% of the adult black population qualified as literate and many of them lived in the quondam free states.

    Do you realize that Jack D does not consider being uninformed an obstacle to opining on historical matters?

  283. @David In TN
    @Jack D

    Regarding the black exultation at the Not Guilty verdict for the obviously guilty O.J. Simpson, Nicholas Stix wrote that black support for Simpson was not due to doubt about his guilt, but the certainty of it.

    During the Simpson trial I worked at a place with a lot of black employees. Every one I talked to knew he was guilty but approved the verdict.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @Jack D, @Anon

    I think there were some people like Stanley Crouch who thought Mark Fuhrman’s recorded remarks had discredited the chain-of-custody.
    ==
    I’ll wager there were others who thought the behavior of Nicole Brown (poaching a high income black man, then separating from him with considerable eclat), Ronald Goldman (being in the company of OJ’s estranged wife and also defending himself), and Mark Fuhrman (uttering insults and slurs on a journalist’s cassette) were ‘disrespectful’ and thus he authorities needed to be taught a lesson.

    • Replies: @David In TN
    @Art Deco

    Just excuses. What did Mark Fuhrman's "recorded remarks" have to do with Simpson's blood being at the murder scene? Or Ron Goldman's blood being in Simpson's Ford Bronco? This means even Stanley Crouch, who was sensible other times, joined in with wanting a guilty murderer to get away with it.

    This WAS an untypical murder trial. Most black murder suspects in a place like LA are unsympathetic figures. O.J. Simpson was different, shall we say.

    And with a jury of mostly black females, Nicole Brown was the most unsympathetic victim imaginable. She was what middle class black women hated.

    As has been said, Marcia Clark was totally inept. She didn't have to call Fuhrman anyway.

    Replies: @Art Deco

  284. @Cagey Beast
    @Reg Cæsar

    Funny that a soldier's religion is not listed.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @fredyetagain aka superhonky

    Funny that a soldier’s religion is not listed

    Can’t seem to find mine (probably gave them to a GF back in the day and never got them back), but yes a serviceman’s religion is listed on his dog tags. Or at least it was in my day.

  285. @Jack D
    @Pixo

    America bought itself a permanent problem when it imported people from the Dark Continent for forced labor. Africa is much closer to Europe and yet there was never such a practice. The Romans would import lions and other beasts to Rome for entertainment but they knew not to bring blacks as cheap labor.

    This is the circle that will never be squared. OTOH, blacks are fully human and yet OTOH their behavior and intelligence are a notch lower than whites on average (with considerable overlap but enough offset in the lower tail to make them permanent problems). Shoulda picked your own cotton. America (whether or not we declare formal "reparations") will be paying for this until the end of time.

    Replies: @Pixo, @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Shoulda picked your own cotton. America (whether or not we declare formal “reparations”) will be paying for this until the end of time.

    Like your ancestors who were ironically blindsided (shmart Ashkenazim! lol) by Hitler and friends, you lack imagination. Must be genetic. Don’t be so glib about what you think the future holds; your Shoah’d relatives made the same mistake. Mr. Sailer has a prudent watchword: The Future Is Unwritten.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    OK, Mr. Nostradamus, y0u tell me what the Final Solution to the Negro Question will be.

    You have no idea how vile and foul and insulting it is (or maybe you do) for you to taunt my ancestors my parents of being stupid and lacking in foresight because they did not see the Holocaust coming, when almost no one did (and even if they had, there was nowhere on earth that was going to take 6 million Jews in in the midst of a worldwide Depression). You have positioned yourself on a perch of omniscient wisdom when in reality you don't know shit.

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Jenner Ickham Errican

  286. @David In TN
    @Jack D

    Regarding the black exultation at the Not Guilty verdict for the obviously guilty O.J. Simpson, Nicholas Stix wrote that black support for Simpson was not due to doubt about his guilt, but the certainty of it.

    During the Simpson trial I worked at a place with a lot of black employees. Every one I talked to knew he was guilty but approved the verdict.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @Jack D, @Anon

    Yes, when it comes to matters of race a lot of things that are seemingly paradoxical are not once you analyze them thru the racial lens. Simpson’s acquittal was cheered BECAUSE he was guilty. Floyd was lionized BECAUSE he was a POS. Chauvin was imprisoned BECAUSE he was innocent. It’s all seen as evening the score after 400 years of being on the short end of the stick.

    Blacks figure that there’s a long way to go before the score will be even. On one level, $5 million a head or whatever they are asking for reparations is insane but OTOH, the amount (and the rampant looting at any opportunity) is a clue to how badly they feel cheated. Now you may say that this too is insane, that their ancestors being put on that boat is the luckiest thing that ever happened to American blacks. But the heart has its own calculus.

    • Replies: @David In TN
    @Jack D

    How long will it take "for the score to be even" regarding the (far more numerous) black on white murders?

    To pick one of the excuses for black crime. Some say "Look at Manson." Exactly. White perpetrators of heinous crimes are usually psychos, drunks, druggies, career criminal types. Blacks who do so are sometimes garden variety people.

    The above comes from a former big time prosecutor with around 30 years experience. He had seen mind boggling examples.

    , @res
    @Jack D


    Blacks figure that there’s a long way to go before the score will be even.
     
    That would be much more tolerable if their calculation was even close to reasonable. The inability to recognize how much they have been given (e.g. affirmative action, disproportionate use of benefits, simply being able to live in a first world country vs. Africa) and taken (e.g. disproportionate crime) makes any discussion of this impossible.

    Instead we get demands for millions of dollars per person for "reparations" (including for some who immigrated since slavery, and some of those who might be descendants of those who sold them in the first place). And we all know that still would not be enough. The only question is how many years (months, weeks, days?) would it take for the next set of demands?

    Replies: @Jack D, @Art Deco, @nebulafox

  287. @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Jack D


    Shoulda picked your own cotton. America (whether or not we declare formal “reparations”) will be paying for this until the end of time.
     
    Like your ancestors who were ironically blindsided (shmart Ashkenazim! lol) by Hitler and friends, you lack imagination. Must be genetic. Don’t be so glib about what you think the future holds; your Shoah’d relatives made the same mistake. Mr. Sailer has a prudent watchword: The Future Is Unwritten.

    Replies: @Jack D

    OK, Mr. Nostradamus, y0u tell me what the Final Solution to the Negro Question will be.

    You have no idea how vile and foul and insulting it is (or maybe you do) for you to taunt my ancestors my parents of being stupid and lacking in foresight because they did not see the Holocaust coming, when almost no one did (and even if they had, there was nowhere on earth that was going to take 6 million Jews in in the midst of a worldwide Depression). You have positioned yourself on a perch of omniscient wisdom when in reality you don’t know shit.

    • Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Jack D


    You have no idea how vile and foul and insulting it is (or maybe you do) for you to taunt my ancestors my parents of being stupid and lacking in foresight because they did not see the Holocaust coming
     
    I taunt YOU for being even more ignorant than your stupid parents, e.g. YOU saying stupid shit in the here and now (no “lack of foresight” excuse) like “governments should have a monopoly of force”, etc. You’ve learned nothing from the Holocaust. Your parents were dumb, you are even dumber.

    there was nowhere on earth that was going to take 6 million Jews in in the midst of a worldwide Depression
     
    If you (collectively) have to run, y’all have already fucked up. Either you’re in the wrong neighborhood (Europe), or unarmed, or both. Centuries of crusades, expulsions, inquisitions, and pogroms might have been a clue to the wise. Zionists, unlike your stupid parents, understood.

    You have positioned yourself on a perch of omniscient wisdom when in reality you don’t know shit.
     
    I’m smarter than you, and certainly out-argue you, which I concede isn’t hard because you lie and contradict yourself constantly.

    Replies: @Jack D

    , @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Jack D


    OK, Mr. Nostradamus, y0u tell me what the Final Solution to the Negro Question will be.
     
    You’re in luck, Michael Corleone has an offer on the table:

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/the-coalition-of-the-fringes-2/#comment-6071657

  288. @William Badwhite
    @Jack D


    The reason I’ve gone to bat for him is some people here seem to have the notion that executing Till for whistling at a while woman was fitting punishment.
     



    Again with the half-truths Jack. Jenner got on you for this earlier in the thread, yet you persist with your pervasive dishonesty. He wasn't "executed" for "whistling". You know this of course, which makes you a liar, not merely wrong.

    Now onto your usual form of lying - restate something that someone wrote ("so what you are saying is...") while leaving out some things, sneaking in other things, then arguing with that straw man instead of what the other person actually wrote:

    Provide at least two citations to support your assertion that "some people here seem to have the notion that executing Till for whistling at a while woman was fitting punishment".

    Just kidding, we all know nobody wrote that and this was just another lie.
     

     

    Replies: @Jack D

    In #143, Jenner said:

    He certainly deserved death in a ‘Darwin awards’ sense: play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Emmett Till deserves zero sympathy.

    I would take that to mean exactly what I said.

    • Replies: @res
    @Jack D

    Jack, one of your less endearing habits is selective quoting (in ways which ignore what you were responding to). Here is the rest of comment 143 which I think was what WB meant.


    No, he was murdered for his threatening actions and alleged post hoc defiance. Whether or not “racist reasons” are wrong is a separate argument.
     

    Replies: @Jack D

  289. @Art Deco
    @David In TN

    I think there were some people like Stanley Crouch who thought Mark Fuhrman's recorded remarks had discredited the chain-of-custody.
    ==
    I'll wager there were others who thought the behavior of Nicole Brown (poaching a high income black man, then separating from him with considerable eclat), Ronald Goldman (being in the company of OJ's estranged wife and also defending himself), and Mark Fuhrman (uttering insults and slurs on a journalist's cassette) were 'disrespectful' and thus he authorities needed to be taught a lesson.

    Replies: @David In TN

    Just excuses. What did Mark Fuhrman’s “recorded remarks” have to do with Simpson’s blood being at the murder scene? Or Ron Goldman’s blood being in Simpson’s Ford Bronco? This means even Stanley Crouch, who was sensible other times, joined in with wanting a guilty murderer to get away with it.

    This WAS an untypical murder trial. Most black murder suspects in a place like LA are unsympathetic figures. O.J. Simpson was different, shall we say.

    And with a jury of mostly black females, Nicole Brown was the most unsympathetic victim imaginable. She was what middle class black women hated.

    As has been said, Marcia Clark was totally inept. She didn’t have to call Fuhrman anyway.

    • Replies: @Art Deco
    @David In TN

    I'm not agreeing with Crouch's reasoning. I think Crouch was on the level if wrong.
    ==
    Steven Brill's judgment was that Marcia Clark was a wretched trial prosecutor ("She spent days questioning witnesses on whom she should have spent an hour"). If I understand correctly, she could have called Fuhrman's partner Brad Roberts, whom, Furhman maintained, was present on the scene for each piece of evidence he (Fuhrman) collected. Fuhrman offered a reason why Roberts was not called, and it supposedly reflected badly on Clark. I cannot recall what the reason was. Another reason not to call Fuhrman was that Capt. Margaret York (Judge Ito's wife) had been in his chain of command and her office had been at the station at which he'd had his home base. I believe Mrs. Ito maintained (in some setting) that she did not recall anything notable about him (she was his boss's boss or his boss's boss's boss). Furhman despised her and said so on tape.
    ==
    You'll recall that Marcia Clark had told her husband around the Christmas holidays in 1993 that she wanted a divorce. During the course of the Simpson proceedings, she went to court to petition for more child-support from him, maintaining the Simpson trial had (among other things) amped up the expense of her wardrobe. (At the time, her pre-tax cash salary was 2.6x his). His response was to ask for temporary full custody of the children. You'll also recall that a scatter of Barbara Ehrenreich types who had platforms on op-ed pages and such denounced him for that. M. Clark was a rather self-centered woman and she had her enablers.

    Replies: @David In TN

  290. @Jack D
    @David In TN

    Yes, when it comes to matters of race a lot of things that are seemingly paradoxical are not once you analyze them thru the racial lens. Simpson's acquittal was cheered BECAUSE he was guilty. Floyd was lionized BECAUSE he was a POS. Chauvin was imprisoned BECAUSE he was innocent. It's all seen as evening the score after 400 years of being on the short end of the stick.

    Blacks figure that there's a long way to go before the score will be even. On one level, $5 million a head or whatever they are asking for reparations is insane but OTOH, the amount (and the rampant looting at any opportunity) is a clue to how badly they feel cheated. Now you may say that this too is insane, that their ancestors being put on that boat is the luckiest thing that ever happened to American blacks. But the heart has its own calculus.

    Replies: @David In TN, @res

    How long will it take “for the score to be even” regarding the (far more numerous) black on white murders?

    To pick one of the excuses for black crime. Some say “Look at Manson.” Exactly. White perpetrators of heinous crimes are usually psychos, drunks, druggies, career criminal types. Blacks who do so are sometimes garden variety people.

    The above comes from a former big time prosecutor with around 30 years experience. He had seen mind boggling examples.

  291. @Corvinus
    @Anonymous Jew

    “Ideally, you want to treat people as individuals. But when the Bell Curves are too far apart that isn’t always pragmatic.”

    So you’re siding with science rather than the Torah. Kindness isn't optional in Judaism.

    Replies: @Ennui, @RadicalCenter

    Ah yes, Corvinus, the Torah is noted for its kind, forgiving code.

    Perhaps you meant the Talmud or some of the later writings of Jewish thought leaders?

  292. @Jack D
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    OK, Mr. Nostradamus, y0u tell me what the Final Solution to the Negro Question will be.

    You have no idea how vile and foul and insulting it is (or maybe you do) for you to taunt my ancestors my parents of being stupid and lacking in foresight because they did not see the Holocaust coming, when almost no one did (and even if they had, there was nowhere on earth that was going to take 6 million Jews in in the midst of a worldwide Depression). You have positioned yourself on a perch of omniscient wisdom when in reality you don't know shit.

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Jenner Ickham Errican

    You have no idea how vile and foul and insulting it is (or maybe you do) for you to taunt my ancestors my parents of being stupid and lacking in foresight because they did not see the Holocaust coming

    I taunt YOU for being even more ignorant than your stupid parents, e.g. YOU saying stupid shit in the here and now (no “lack of foresight” excuse) like “governments should have a monopoly of force”, etc. You’ve learned nothing from the Holocaust. Your parents were dumb, you are even dumber.

    there was nowhere on earth that was going to take 6 million Jews in in the midst of a worldwide Depression

    If you (collectively) have to run, y’all have already fucked up. Either you’re in the wrong neighborhood (Europe), or unarmed, or both. Centuries of crusades, expulsions, inquisitions, and pogroms might have been a clue to the wise. Zionists, unlike your stupid parents, understood.

    You have positioned yourself on a perch of omniscient wisdom when in reality you don’t know shit.

    I’m smarter than you, and certainly out-argue you, which I concede isn’t hard because you lie and contradict yourself constantly.

    • Thanks: RadicalCenter
    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    On the internet no one knows if you are a dog. Based on your consistent overestimation of yourself I am beginning to suspect that you are black.

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican

  293. @Jack D
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    OK, Mr. Nostradamus, y0u tell me what the Final Solution to the Negro Question will be.

    You have no idea how vile and foul and insulting it is (or maybe you do) for you to taunt my ancestors my parents of being stupid and lacking in foresight because they did not see the Holocaust coming, when almost no one did (and even if they had, there was nowhere on earth that was going to take 6 million Jews in in the midst of a worldwide Depression). You have positioned yourself on a perch of omniscient wisdom when in reality you don't know shit.

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Jenner Ickham Errican

    OK, Mr. Nostradamus, y0u tell me what the Final Solution to the Negro Question will be.

    You’re in luck, Michael Corleone has an offer on the table:

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/the-coalition-of-the-fringes-2/#comment-6071657

  294. @David In TN
    @Art Deco

    Just excuses. What did Mark Fuhrman's "recorded remarks" have to do with Simpson's blood being at the murder scene? Or Ron Goldman's blood being in Simpson's Ford Bronco? This means even Stanley Crouch, who was sensible other times, joined in with wanting a guilty murderer to get away with it.

    This WAS an untypical murder trial. Most black murder suspects in a place like LA are unsympathetic figures. O.J. Simpson was different, shall we say.

    And with a jury of mostly black females, Nicole Brown was the most unsympathetic victim imaginable. She was what middle class black women hated.

    As has been said, Marcia Clark was totally inept. She didn't have to call Fuhrman anyway.

    Replies: @Art Deco

    I’m not agreeing with Crouch’s reasoning. I think Crouch was on the level if wrong.
    ==
    Steven Brill’s judgment was that Marcia Clark was a wretched trial prosecutor (“She spent days questioning witnesses on whom she should have spent an hour”). If I understand correctly, she could have called Fuhrman’s partner Brad Roberts, whom, Furhman maintained, was present on the scene for each piece of evidence he (Fuhrman) collected. Fuhrman offered a reason why Roberts was not called, and it supposedly reflected badly on Clark. I cannot recall what the reason was. Another reason not to call Fuhrman was that Capt. Margaret York (Judge Ito’s wife) had been in his chain of command and her office had been at the station at which he’d had his home base. I believe Mrs. Ito maintained (in some setting) that she did not recall anything notable about him (she was his boss’s boss or his boss’s boss’s boss). Furhman despised her and said so on tape.
    ==
    You’ll recall that Marcia Clark had told her husband around the Christmas holidays in 1993 that she wanted a divorce. During the course of the Simpson proceedings, she went to court to petition for more child-support from him, maintaining the Simpson trial had (among other things) amped up the expense of her wardrobe. (At the time, her pre-tax cash salary was 2.6x his). His response was to ask for temporary full custody of the children. You’ll also recall that a scatter of Barbara Ehrenreich types who had platforms on op-ed pages and such denounced him for that. M. Clark was a rather self-centered woman and she had her enablers.

    • Replies: @David In TN
    @Art Deco

    Yes, I remember how Clark manipulated her "child custody" issues, knowing how the media would spin them. And she should have called Brad Roberts.

    Another point never mentioned. There were several black officers and detectives at the crime scenes. The news videos at Simpson's house waiting for him to come back from Chicago showed them. Daniel Petrocelli, in his book, was perplexed why Clark didn't call them as he did in the civil trial.

    A black officer named Donald Thompson for the civil trial plaintiffs testified by pointing at photos of the blood left by Simpson at the crime scene. Clark never called him or black detective Bert Luper. Johnnie Cochran called them for the defense.

    Sheer imbecility by Marcia Clark.

    Replies: @Jack D

  295. @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Jack D


    You have no idea how vile and foul and insulting it is (or maybe you do) for you to taunt my ancestors my parents of being stupid and lacking in foresight because they did not see the Holocaust coming
     
    I taunt YOU for being even more ignorant than your stupid parents, e.g. YOU saying stupid shit in the here and now (no “lack of foresight” excuse) like “governments should have a monopoly of force”, etc. You’ve learned nothing from the Holocaust. Your parents were dumb, you are even dumber.

    there was nowhere on earth that was going to take 6 million Jews in in the midst of a worldwide Depression
     
    If you (collectively) have to run, y’all have already fucked up. Either you’re in the wrong neighborhood (Europe), or unarmed, or both. Centuries of crusades, expulsions, inquisitions, and pogroms might have been a clue to the wise. Zionists, unlike your stupid parents, understood.

    You have positioned yourself on a perch of omniscient wisdom when in reality you don’t know shit.
     
    I’m smarter than you, and certainly out-argue you, which I concede isn’t hard because you lie and contradict yourself constantly.

    Replies: @Jack D

    On the internet no one knows if you are a dog. Based on your consistent overestimation of yourself I am beginning to suspect that you are black.

    • Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Jack D


    Based on your consistent overestimation of yourself ...
     
    Any examples, or are you just gonna point and sputter? None of our comments here require any “estimation”; either they stand up or they don’t. I’m not the only one here in this thread pointing out your dishonesty and stupidity. E.g., if you’ve lost the level-headed and reasonable commenter res, you may be fucking up.

    ... I am beginning to suspect that you are black.
     
    Sheeeeiiiitttt, that would mean that you are getting out-argued by a Black every time we disagree. BOOM shaka laka laka

    Replies: @Jack D

  296. @Jack D
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    On the internet no one knows if you are a dog. Based on your consistent overestimation of yourself I am beginning to suspect that you are black.

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Based on your consistent overestimation of yourself …

    Any examples, or are you just gonna point and sputter? None of our comments here require any “estimation”; either they stand up or they don’t. I’m not the only one here in this thread pointing out your dishonesty and stupidity. E.g., if you’ve lost the level-headed and reasonable commenter res, you may be fucking up.

    … I am beginning to suspect that you are black.

    Sheeeeiiiitttt, that would mean that you are getting out-argued by a Black every time we disagree. BOOM shaka laka laka

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Any examples [of overestimation]?

    "I’m smarter than you, and certainly out-argue you"

    Declaring yourself the self proclaimed victor in an argument is a very black thang. Total lack of self awareness that that is what you are doing is also a black thang. A sure sign of Dunning–Kruger.

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican

  297. @Jack D
    @Art Deco

    All over the former E. Bloc there were thousands of statues of Lenin (and for a while, Stalin). Were they there because the locals valued them? To the extent that Civil War generals were popular in the South, part of that was a massive, organized propaganda campaign that was quite successful in brainwashing people. In some places in the E. Bloc, Lenin and Stalin also enjoyed a lot of popularity among ordinary people. For that matter, the ordinary people of German admired Hitler for a while.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Wilkey, @rebel yell, @Hypnotoad666, @Art Deco, @mc23

    Almost ten percent of Confederate men died serving in the Civil War. The damage to the towns and countryside was immense causing widespread civilian suffering.

    They didn’t need a propaganda campaign to memorialize their dead and suffering. The war was mythologized as the pernicious Noble Lost Cause by the South but that’s a different story

    • Replies: @Anon
    @mc23


    The war was mythologized as the pernicious Noble Lost Cause by the South but that’s a different story
     
    It was in fact a Noble Cause. Independence, White sovereignty are noble causes.
  298. @David In TN
    @Jack D

    Regarding the black exultation at the Not Guilty verdict for the obviously guilty O.J. Simpson, Nicholas Stix wrote that black support for Simpson was not due to doubt about his guilt, but the certainty of it.

    During the Simpson trial I worked at a place with a lot of black employees. Every one I talked to knew he was guilty but approved the verdict.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @Jack D, @Anon

    During the Simpson trial I worked at a place with a lot of black employees. Every one I talked to knew he was guilty but approved the verdict.

    Why? Why did they approve the verdict?

    • Replies: @David In TN
    @Anon

    They were glad Simpson got away with it.

    Replies: @Anon

    , @Big P
    @Anon

    They are no-good 3/5 vermin

    (actually, my math is off; it's more like 1/5)

    The fact we are paying dearly for slavery to this day draws extreme ire.

  299. @mc23
    @Jack D

    Almost ten percent of Confederate men died serving in the Civil War. The damage to the towns and countryside was immense causing widespread civilian suffering.

    They didn't need a propaganda campaign to memorialize their dead and suffering. The war was mythologized as the pernicious Noble Lost Cause by the South but that's a different story

    Replies: @Anon

    The war was mythologized as the pernicious Noble Lost Cause by the South but that’s a different story

    It was in fact a Noble Cause. Independence, White sovereignty are noble causes.

  300. @Art Deco
    @David In TN

    I'm not agreeing with Crouch's reasoning. I think Crouch was on the level if wrong.
    ==
    Steven Brill's judgment was that Marcia Clark was a wretched trial prosecutor ("She spent days questioning witnesses on whom she should have spent an hour"). If I understand correctly, she could have called Fuhrman's partner Brad Roberts, whom, Furhman maintained, was present on the scene for each piece of evidence he (Fuhrman) collected. Fuhrman offered a reason why Roberts was not called, and it supposedly reflected badly on Clark. I cannot recall what the reason was. Another reason not to call Fuhrman was that Capt. Margaret York (Judge Ito's wife) had been in his chain of command and her office had been at the station at which he'd had his home base. I believe Mrs. Ito maintained (in some setting) that she did not recall anything notable about him (she was his boss's boss or his boss's boss's boss). Furhman despised her and said so on tape.
    ==
    You'll recall that Marcia Clark had told her husband around the Christmas holidays in 1993 that she wanted a divorce. During the course of the Simpson proceedings, she went to court to petition for more child-support from him, maintaining the Simpson trial had (among other things) amped up the expense of her wardrobe. (At the time, her pre-tax cash salary was 2.6x his). His response was to ask for temporary full custody of the children. You'll also recall that a scatter of Barbara Ehrenreich types who had platforms on op-ed pages and such denounced him for that. M. Clark was a rather self-centered woman and she had her enablers.

    Replies: @David In TN

    Yes, I remember how Clark manipulated her “child custody” issues, knowing how the media would spin them. And she should have called Brad Roberts.

    Another point never mentioned. There were several black officers and detectives at the crime scenes. The news videos at Simpson’s house waiting for him to come back from Chicago showed them. Daniel Petrocelli, in his book, was perplexed why Clark didn’t call them as he did in the civil trial.

    A black officer named Donald Thompson for the civil trial plaintiffs testified by pointing at photos of the blood left by Simpson at the crime scene. Clark never called him or black detective Bert Luper. Johnnie Cochran called them for the defense.

    Sheer imbecility by Marcia Clark.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @David In TN

    At some point in the trial, the goal of making Marcia Clark a nationally famous celebrity overtook the goal of doing her job for the State. She succeeded in the former task, which was her main goal. Classic principal-agent problem.

    Televising the trial was the stupidest decision ever. Turning a courtroom into the set of a Reality TV show is a sure way to thwart justice.

  301. @The Germ Theory of Disease
    Sorry to go all off the ranch OT but i just think everybody could use a bit of cheering up from the old days......


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIcb7MnCkLs


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3ov9USxVxY

    Remember back when Madonna was fun, and not a pain in the ass?


    Part of the reason I'm putting this here is, even though I share a more bizarre spiritual kinship with La PJ, physically I grew up in the same place and time as Madonna, and i remember just how horrible everything was; so she found a way to do something kooky and pleasant and happy with all of that non-stop monstrosity, and so because she figured that out, and also made a freaking fortune out of doing it, what can I say? except, I dips me lid.

    Sorry everything else later got a bit too ka-razy, but ya gotta admit, at least the 80s were fun. And I can certainly tell you that your 1980s were a LOT more fun than my 1980s.

    Replies: @Pat Hannagan, @Legba, @Joe Stalin, @Richard B, @RadicalCenter

    As a father blessed with numerous daughters, let me say about the “star” of those videos: she was a slut and an exhibitionist back then, albeit a talented one, and she has remained such. “Madonna” has been a disgrace and a poor example to girls ever since then.

    May she change her ways, in sha Allah.

  302. Yes, we all must bow our heads in shame because a Chicago wiseass punk pissed off a pair of southern-fried retards nearly three-quarters of a century ago.

    Imagine the fun future generations will have pulling down the strange new crop of monuments from our time.

  303. @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Jack D


    Based on your consistent overestimation of yourself ...
     
    Any examples, or are you just gonna point and sputter? None of our comments here require any “estimation”; either they stand up or they don’t. I’m not the only one here in this thread pointing out your dishonesty and stupidity. E.g., if you’ve lost the level-headed and reasonable commenter res, you may be fucking up.

    ... I am beginning to suspect that you are black.
     
    Sheeeeiiiitttt, that would mean that you are getting out-argued by a Black every time we disagree. BOOM shaka laka laka

    Replies: @Jack D

    Any examples [of overestimation]?

    “I’m smarter than you, and certainly out-argue you”

    Declaring yourself the self proclaimed victor in an argument is a very black thang. Total lack of self awareness that that is what you are doing is also a black thang. A sure sign of Dunning–Kruger.

    • Troll: RadicalCenter
    • Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Jack D


    Declaring yourself the self proclaimed victor in an argument
     
    Your redumbdancy aside, once again you lie (by omission): It’s not just “self-proclaimed”, liar, most others in this thread (on Till) clearly agree with me on this subject rather than with you. I am the objective winner of the argument—you’ve only offered repeated lies about Till’s conduct in service of your melodramatic opinion about his killing. You lost the argument, and you’re just being stubborn.

    Replies: @Jack D

  304. @David In TN
    @Art Deco

    Yes, I remember how Clark manipulated her "child custody" issues, knowing how the media would spin them. And she should have called Brad Roberts.

    Another point never mentioned. There were several black officers and detectives at the crime scenes. The news videos at Simpson's house waiting for him to come back from Chicago showed them. Daniel Petrocelli, in his book, was perplexed why Clark didn't call them as he did in the civil trial.

    A black officer named Donald Thompson for the civil trial plaintiffs testified by pointing at photos of the blood left by Simpson at the crime scene. Clark never called him or black detective Bert Luper. Johnnie Cochran called them for the defense.

    Sheer imbecility by Marcia Clark.

    Replies: @Jack D

    At some point in the trial, the goal of making Marcia Clark a nationally famous celebrity overtook the goal of doing her job for the State. She succeeded in the former task, which was her main goal. Classic principal-agent problem.

    Televising the trial was the stupidest decision ever. Turning a courtroom into the set of a Reality TV show is a sure way to thwart justice.

    • Thanks: bomag
  305. @Wilkey
    @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY)

    Martin Luther King Day (1983) and Juneteenth (2021).

    Incidentally, Memorial Day and Columbus Day only became federal holidays in 1968. That's still nearly a decade before I was born, but I never would have guessed they were that recent.

    Replies: @AnotherDad, @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY), @Ralph L, @RadicalCenter

    We should add two more federal holidays. A popular political compromise would be Irish Heritage Day on “Saint” Patrick’s Day plus a Mexican Heritage Day on Cinco de Mayo. That covers two of the largest ethno-cultural groups/influences in the country. Perhaps the two largest, at this point.

    This wouldn’t directly benefit only government employees, but also employees of banks and most corporations.

    Let tens of millions of people spend more time with their families, resting, exercising, and in our case learning — less time polluting the air and water with stressful commutes. We can still get done what needs to be done.

    Some small businesses that choose to remain open would be busier, especially restaurants.

    • Replies: @Wilkey
    @RadicalCenter


    We should add two more federal holidays.
     
    Yes, of course: two more federal holidays that the vast majority of people working in the private sector won't have off. Because who gives a shit about those of us who work in the private sector?
  306. @Wilkey
    @JohnnyWalker123


    The pandemic really is over — US death rate has returned to normal.
     
    Since COVID killed off hundreds of thousands of people mostly in their last few years of life, a true end to the pandemic would be death rates below normal, as there were people dying in 2020 who would otherwise have died in 2021-2023. There are people who aren't around to die at age 84 this year because they died of COVID at age 82.

    But death rates haven't gone below normal, which means people still dying of COVID and/or increases in other causes of death, like all of the new social ills we have to thank as a result of lockdowns, increased violence due to depolicing, or increased OD deaths thanks to all the drugs coming in across our unsecured border.

    Replies: @RadicalCenter

    The excess deaths appear more likely the result of the injections (which arguably do not even qualify as “vaccines” under the definition used until 2021) than covid-19 and variants.

    No surprise if people continue to die prematurely — not just old infirm people — from the injections in 2023, 2024, and onward. This is especially true if the sheeple keep trooping out to “get boosted.” The injections make you more likely to become infected and more likely to be seriously unnecessarily impaired or die.

    For starters:

    https://kirschsubstack.com/p/is-the-cdc-totally-blind-to-all-the?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

    https://kirschsubstack.com/p/breaking-vaers-data-clearly-shows?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

    https://kirschsubstack.com/p/will-the-anti-anti-vaxxers-ever-acknowledge?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

    Love to see Unz debate Kirsch, in person or in a lengthy written exchange.

  307. @fredyetagain aka superhonky
    @Jack D


    Whites in the American South drew the wrong lesson after Haiti – they should have put their Africans back on a boat instead of doubling down on permanent rule by terror. Anything short of that was just kicking the can down the road.
     
    Jack, you've written a lot of truly monumentally stupid things here regarding this emmett till issue, but except for your "rule by terror" histrionics, you've actually made a good point above. Too bad the boat solution you mentioned was never implemented; it would have saved a lot of innocent White suffering at the hands of feral, sadistic blacks.
    Oh and btw, both till and your co-ethnic leo frank got exactly what they deserved.

    Replies: @Jack D, @Art Deco

    Oh and btw, both till and your co-ethnic leo frank got exactly what they deserved.

    I disagree but what is really important is not that they got what they deserved but the process. Our legal system is carefully calibrated to protect the rights of the innocent. Benjamin Franklin phrased it thusly:

    “it is better 100 guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer”

    This is especially true in case of capital punishment where there is no going back.

    Mob justice does not operate by this principle. Sometimes the mob gets it right and sometimes it gets it wrong. Even when it gets it right, it is purely by luck because there is no real process to determine guilt, just mob sentiment. And if it get it wrong? Oops. Sorry.

    Frank’s guilt is still debated but at least you could say that the punishment fit the crime IF he was guilty. In Till’s case, even assuming the worst version of what he allegedly did, death was not the appropriate penalty and it’s ridiculous that you think that it is. If Till had been a 14 year old white boy there’s no way on earth you would think that he “got what he deserved”.

    • Replies: @David In TN
    @Jack D

    Speaking of the murder of Mary Phagan, the Georgia law enforcement authorities believed Leo Frank was guilty when they arrested him and tried him for the murder. And the black janitor, Jim Conley, was the main prosecution witness. Later it developed that Conley was likely the killer.

    The Atlanta cops thought a black who killed a White girl would have run off. Instead, Conley stayed and implicated his boss. White men in early 20th century Georgia would NEVER knowingly have allowed a black to rape-murder a White girl and get away with it.

    Unfortunately DNA did not exist at the time.

    Replies: @Jack D

    , @fredyetagain aka superhonky
    @Jack D

    Thank you Jack for at least addressing the issues, instead of just screeching "eeek, anti-semitism!! racism!!" That said:


    Frank’s guilt is still debated but at least you could say that the punishment fit the crime IF he was guilty.
     
    There is no debate. The rapist frank got what he deserved. The only reason there's any so-called "debate" going on is because the anti-White ADL (created btw to defend this scumbag rapist/murderer) still needs to shake a few shekels out of the pockets of geriatric jews in Miami Beach. Besides that, only the descendants of Mary Anne Phagan have felt the need to engage in this debate, because the l'chaimstream media have (for decades now) been telling us that poor little frank was nothing but a sweet innocent and a poor victim of "eeek, anti-semitism!!' You would recognize frank's guilt yourself, Jack, if you could view the facts dispassionately instead of (as you always seem to do) trying to let your co-ethnics off the hook.

    If Till had been a 14 year old white boy there’s no way on earth you would think that he “got what he deserved”.
     
    Now I'm not saying that there are no 14-year old White boys who would have sexually assaulted a woman the way the negro till did, but once again the concept of per capita must be taken into consideration. On a per capita basis, nagger bucks and pre-bucks (like till) are so much more dangerous than any other demographic (something like 7% of the population committing something like 50% of the murders in this country!), it's not even funny. But that's speaking broadly. Going back to the specifics of this particular case, of course till needed to be dealt with in the manner he was. When a sub-population within the general population proves itself (by its actions) to be only sub-human, then at times DECISIVE action must be taken to keep the sub-humans in line.

    In the words of Metallica, "sad but true".
    , @Colin Wright
    @Jack D


    '...If Till had been a 14 year old white boy there’s no way on earth you would think that he “got what he deserved”...'
     
    Actually -- had Till been white -- I would be inclined to shrug. Nice if he could have learned the lesson more cheaply, but...

    But then -- had Till been white -- we wouldn't even be discussing the killing now, let alone finding in it some kind of unique and unfathomable horror.

    That, we do because the precious little angel was black. Should I even bother to recount the truly savage and unprovoked murder of a Chinese retard at the hands of a black mob that I read about in 1976 or so? How'd you like to hear about how the retard's sister showed up and desperately tried to break through the ring of onlookers again and again as the killer methodically kicked in the skull of her brother?

    That made it to page eighteen of the local paper. But then, the victim wasn't black. Barely local news. Devoid of significance.
  308. @Corvinus
    @Anonymous Jew

    “Ideally, you want to treat people as individuals. But when the Bell Curves are too far apart that isn’t always pragmatic.”

    So you’re siding with science rather than the Torah. Kindness isn't optional in Judaism.

    Replies: @Ennui, @RadicalCenter

    As you well know, the “Old Testament” is chock full of vicious unnecessary cruelty allegedly perpetrated by God, or by the “chosen people” with the approval or command of God. Tells us all we need to know about anyone, Jewish or Christian or Muslim, who believes in those “holy books” as the “word of God.”

    It’s quick and easy to read the “OT” and verify this. Sane non-psychopathic people have no obligation to accord respect to maniacs who say they believe in the OT / “the torah.”

    Shame on you and the rest of your ilk from all three abrahamic “religions” who refuse to condemn and reject the old testament’s vile celebration of sadism, murder and torture.

    Justify these, you sick bastard, and tell us again about “kindness” in Judaism and the Judaism-descended/influenced “religions”:

    https://skepticsannotatedbible.com/dwb/TOC.html

    There are many millions of good hearted, fairminded, kind, peaceful people calling themselves Christians, jews and Muslims — but only because they do not conduct themselves ANYthing like the “God” or ”his chosen people” portrayed and lionized in the OT. Why not come out and explicitly reject the whole vile mess already?

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    @RadicalCenter

    “Tells us all we need to know about anyone, Jewish or Christian or Muslim, who believes in those “holy books” as the “word of God.”

    True defenders of white society and Western Civilization embrace the Bible and the word of God.

    “Sane non-psychopathic people have no obligation to accord respect to maniacs who say they believe in the OT / “the torah.”

    Equating believers of Christianity and Judaism as being “maniacs” is self-serving.

    “Shame on you and the rest of your ilk from all three abrahamic “religions””

    This is what a man possessed by evil says.

  309. I am waiting for Miles Mathis to declare that Emmit faked his death. Or has he done it already?

  310. @Jack D
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Any examples [of overestimation]?

    "I’m smarter than you, and certainly out-argue you"

    Declaring yourself the self proclaimed victor in an argument is a very black thang. Total lack of self awareness that that is what you are doing is also a black thang. A sure sign of Dunning–Kruger.

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Declaring yourself the self proclaimed victor in an argument

    Your redumbdancy aside, once again you lie (by omission): It’s not just “self-proclaimed”, liar, most others in this thread (on Till) clearly agree with me on this subject rather than with you. I am the objective winner of the argument—you’ve only offered repeated lies about Till’s conduct in service of your melodramatic opinion about his killing. You lost the argument, and you’re just being stubborn.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    You're still keeping your own score. Remind me never to play golf with you.

    Unz is a somewhat unique group. Most Americans don't consider The Protocols of the Elders of Zion to be required reading. What about on the national level? The President of the United States has just declared Till to be an National Hero. It's only a matter of time before we celebrate Till's Birthday as a national holiday instead of Slave Owner Washington's Birthday. So who has REALLY won this argument?

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Reg Cæsar

  311. res says:
    @Jack D
    @David In TN

    Yes, when it comes to matters of race a lot of things that are seemingly paradoxical are not once you analyze them thru the racial lens. Simpson's acquittal was cheered BECAUSE he was guilty. Floyd was lionized BECAUSE he was a POS. Chauvin was imprisoned BECAUSE he was innocent. It's all seen as evening the score after 400 years of being on the short end of the stick.

    Blacks figure that there's a long way to go before the score will be even. On one level, $5 million a head or whatever they are asking for reparations is insane but OTOH, the amount (and the rampant looting at any opportunity) is a clue to how badly they feel cheated. Now you may say that this too is insane, that their ancestors being put on that boat is the luckiest thing that ever happened to American blacks. But the heart has its own calculus.

    Replies: @David In TN, @res

    Blacks figure that there’s a long way to go before the score will be even.

    That would be much more tolerable if their calculation was even close to reasonable. The inability to recognize how much they have been given (e.g. affirmative action, disproportionate use of benefits, simply being able to live in a first world country vs. Africa) and taken (e.g. disproportionate crime) makes any discussion of this impossible.

    Instead we get demands for millions of dollars per person for “reparations” (including for some who immigrated since slavery, and some of those who might be descendants of those who sold them in the first place). And we all know that still would not be enough. The only question is how many years (months, weeks, days?) would it take for the next set of demands?

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @res

    As someone else said, blacks are a cheap date for Democrats (who in any case spend taxpayer money and not their own money). So far at least, all that has been given is lip service ABOUT reparations rather than any actual money. The outrageous (from the white and fiscally sound POV - for blacks no amount would be too much) demands only make it LESS likely that they will get anything at all. If there was some reasonable demand then at least in cities with a small black population it would have been possible to give each black a few thousand $ without breaking the budget, but at $5 million a head it becomes completely impossible almost everywhere. Even is a city like SF with a small black % the amounts demanded are several times the entire annual budget of the city.

    One almost wonders if these demands were DESIGNED to be refused so that blacks could keep nursing their grievances and never have to hear "that claim was settled so don't go asking for more $".

    , @Art Deco
    @res

    It's a reasonable counter-factual that the problems to which you refer we have because white leftists have invited them.
    ==
    Imagine the policy had been to distribute public sector positions by timely written examinations; end segregation in public parks, buildings, and conveyances; end mandated segregation in commercial service provision, stop enforcing restrictive covenants on property deeds; end government intervention in the real estate sector bar building codes, land-use planning, and property tax assessment and levies; scrap parallel school systems, rejigger funding formulae for primary and secondary schooling, debar jim crow provisions in collective bargaining agreements, mandate impartial service in utilities and in certain services for travelers, establish public defender's offices and Miranda rights, reapportion the legislatures, and institute impartial procedures for assembling voter rolls. IOW, put an end to all the shitty little contrivances but otherwise eschew institutionalized social work and leave people to cope with life with their wits and with the bits of common provision provided the whole populace.
    ==
    Chronic dissatisfaction and recrimination is a function of it being encouraged and rewarded.

    , @nebulafox
    @res

    Just force them to put a concrete number on it and legal documentation giving up any further claims. They never will. They can’t. Blacks are already losing political power as it is, not least ironically thanks to immigration.

    (Have you seen the political affiliations for men under 35? The whole woke project is being rejected: and this is happening across different racial demographics. That’s the real fulcrum that the GOP should exploit. Simply by making it OK for men and women to accept their natural desires and differences again, they’ll attract both in the long run.)

  312. res says:
    @Jack D
    @William Badwhite

    In #143, Jenner said:


    He certainly deserved death in a ‘Darwin awards’ sense: play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Emmett Till deserves zero sympathy.
     
    I would take that to mean exactly what I said.

    Replies: @res

    Jack, one of your less endearing habits is selective quoting (in ways which ignore what you were responding to). Here is the rest of comment 143 which I think was what WB meant.

    No, he was murdered for his threatening actions and alleged post hoc defiance. Whether or not “racist reasons” are wrong is a separate argument.

    • Replies: @Jack D
    @res

    It's hard to call his actions "threatening" unless you are a partisan. As a female commenter mentioned here, outrageously bold approaches of white (and black) females by urban black men (in this case a teenager) are common (if wildly out of place in rural Mississippi). I gather that black men are not really picky about whom they mate with as long as it is female and that they operate on the "if you don't ask you don't get" principle. Maybe if you ask 100 females and 1 says yes, that's better than being an incel and batting 0 for 0.

    I gather that his remarks were more of the "C'mon baby, you know that you want it!" variety than actual threats. He also had apparently been egged on by a dare from his local "friends" to whom he had boasted of prior experience with white girls in Chicago.

    As for post hoc defiance, Till cannot speak for himself so we have only the word of his murderers and their accomplices.

    Replies: @Colin Wright

  313. @SF
    Suppose we could have a serious conversation on the subject of what is the best deal we could give the blacks without running the country into the ground. Something symbolic like this, yeah, I would throw that into the deal.

    Replies: @Colin Wright

    ‘Suppose we could have a serious conversation on the subject of what is the best deal we could give the blacks without running the country into the ground. Something symbolic like this, yeah, I would throw that into the deal.’

    Whatever ‘deal’ you offer blacks. they will (and do) just demand more. Offer them civil rights, and they demand reparations.

    I say we should give them what is convenient for us, what they can handle, and what will work: Jim Crow.

    For those who don’t like it, we’ll offer a free one-way plane ticket to the African nation of their choice.

    • Replies: @Big P
    @Colin Wright

    The real issue is once reparations are made, things will be repaired, right?

    Of course we know that'll never happen. All of the other redundant points against reparations neednt be recapitulated; we already understand not a dirty cent be owed to any damn person.

    Replies: @Colin Wright

    , @nebulafox
    @Colin Wright

    > For those who don’t like it, we’ll offer a free one-way plane ticket to the African nation of their choice.

    Have you ever interacted with actual African-born Africans? Why would they want or accept them?

    As early as the 1800s, it was pretty clear that black Americans were their own, throughly New World cultural construct. Only Americans (white or black) seem to believe they have anything more in common with Africans than white Americans have with Europeans.

    Replies: @Colin Wright

  314. @Anon
    @David In TN


    During the Simpson trial I worked at a place with a lot of black employees. Every one I talked to knew he was guilty but approved the verdict.
     
    Why? Why did they approve the verdict?

    Replies: @David In TN, @Big P

    They were glad Simpson got away with it.

    • Replies: @Anon
    @David In TN


    They were glad Simpson got away with it.
     
    Okay, but why? Why were they glad that Simpson got away with it?

    Replies: @Jim Don Bob

  315. Interesting (while awful) sidelight on genetic/familial propensity, like-father-like-son and all that.

    A nice couple in Scotland adopted a brother and sister, aged 5 and 3.

    Aged 19, the brother stripped, sexually assaulted and killed his 16 year old sister. Both children were no longer living with their foster parents.

    He left her body where he killed her. The next person to arrive on the scene a day or two later, a total stranger of 45, didn’t call the police in horror. He masturbated over her body.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12336945/Man-Amber-Gibsons-naked-body-woodland-violated-instead-telling-police-Pervert-45-told-faces-lengthy-jail-term-horrific-crimes-against-tragic-16-year-old.html

    And as it transpired, there was already another young man of 19 awaiting trial for raping poor Amber Gibson.

    They’d originally been taken into care because their biological father was beating up their mother.

    That father was jailed in April this year for raping and beating a woman. First offence? What are the odds?

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12336559/Biological-father-teenager-murdered-sexually-assaulted-16-year-old-sister-jailed-raping-woman-grabbed-neck-strangled-chilling-echo-son-did.html

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12336903/Amber-Gibson-life-misery.html?ico=related-replace

    PS – just heard Sinead O’Connor is dead. God rest her troubled soul. Her son by Donal Lunny (another great Irish musician) killed himself aged 17 just 18 months ago.

    • Thanks: Alden
  316. @res
    @Jack D

    Jack, one of your less endearing habits is selective quoting (in ways which ignore what you were responding to). Here is the rest of comment 143 which I think was what WB meant.


    No, he was murdered for his threatening actions and alleged post hoc defiance. Whether or not “racist reasons” are wrong is a separate argument.
     

    Replies: @Jack D

    It’s hard to call his actions “threatening” unless you are a partisan. As a female commenter mentioned here, outrageously bold approaches of white (and black) females by urban black men (in this case a teenager) are common (if wildly out of place in rural Mississippi). I gather that black men are not really picky about whom they mate with as long as it is female and that they operate on the “if you don’t ask you don’t get” principle. Maybe if you ask 100 females and 1 says yes, that’s better than being an incel and batting 0 for 0.

    I gather that his remarks were more of the “C’mon baby, you know that you want it!” variety than actual threats. He also had apparently been egged on by a dare from his local “friends” to whom he had boasted of prior experience with white girls in Chicago.

    As for post hoc defiance, Till cannot speak for himself so we have only the word of his murderers and their accomplices.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    @Jack D


    '...As for post hoc defiance, Till cannot speak for himself so we have only the word of his murderers and their accomplices.'
     
    The point really is that it wasn't a particularly outrageous killing -- as killings go. I'd compare it to a murder occurring in the course of a holdup -- as opposed to say, one of those dreary horrors I'd rather not detail. A man losing his temper in a domestic quarrel...one of those petty, tragic but rather meaningless conjunctions of fate. It's all actually a bit like an incident recounted in a chronicle of traditional Indian village life I once read: Behind Mud Walls. A lower-caste villager had been impudent to an upper-caste villager. The upper-caste men jawed about it for a while, then all went and got sticks and gave dude a thorough thrashing.

    Wrong? Okay. A memorable event in a nation's history?

    Please. Emmitt Till was an obnoxious punk who managed to get himself killed; this is a relatively common fate for obnoxious punks; it's not the murder of Thomas Becket. Outside of the immediate time and place, and the immediate participants, it's a non-event. Tell me about the equivalent happening in 1957 Slovenia -- actually, please don't. I don't care.

    So why is it noteworthy seventy years after the fact -- the subject of a film, no less? It's as demented as that outbreak of foot washing after the death of Saint Floyd.

    Till's death is a footnote; the original Look magazine article gave it ample attention. It is significant that we genuflect about it now, alright -- but not in the way you imply.
  317. @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Jack D


    Declaring yourself the self proclaimed victor in an argument
     
    Your redumbdancy aside, once again you lie (by omission): It’s not just “self-proclaimed”, liar, most others in this thread (on Till) clearly agree with me on this subject rather than with you. I am the objective winner of the argument—you’ve only offered repeated lies about Till’s conduct in service of your melodramatic opinion about his killing. You lost the argument, and you’re just being stubborn.

    Replies: @Jack D

    You’re still keeping your own score. Remind me never to play golf with you.

    Unz is a somewhat unique group. Most Americans don’t consider The Protocols of the Elders of Zion to be required reading. What about on the national level? The President of the United States has just declared Till to be an National Hero. It’s only a matter of time before we celebrate Till’s Birthday as a national holiday instead of Slave Owner Washington’s Birthday. So who has REALLY won this argument?

    • Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Jack D


    You’re still keeping your own score.
     
    LOL, no. You’re the only one who has disagreed (to me) on my Emmett Till opinion, while lots of regulars have disagreed with you, including a bunch who have agreed with me directly or cited my comments favorable against yours. It looks like at least 10:1 ratio consensus in my favor on this. Your arguments (i.e., lies) fail not just with me, but most of the commentariat. The ‘gameplay’ and 'scoring' is entirely in public view; you lost.

    Most Americans don’t consider The Protocols of the Elders of Zion to be required reading.
     
    Are you saying it’s because most Americans are anti-Semitic already? The President of the United States, whose opinion you seem to respect, sure seems worried:

    https://twitter.com/POTUS/status/1661756508273606656


    What about on the national level? The President of the United States has just declared Till to be an National Hero.
     
    What types of people do you think would find Emmett Till to be a hero? Rapist sympathizers? Anti-Whites? Pervert Biden is demonstrably anti-White; I can see why (((you))) would cite him favorably as a moral authority:

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/the-white-scare/#comment-5549169 (#34)

    , @Reg Cæsar
    @Jack D


    Remind me never to play golf with you.
     
    Better yet, mash him with your mashie!


    https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/mWkAAOSwEOhft1uw/s-l1200.webp


    Arguments can wallow in the pigsty here, but there are only two commenters who aim for the all-out Dalrymple-style humiliation of others. One of them is Corvinus. The other, even worse, is Jenner.


    https://imageproxy.ifunny.co/crop:x-20,resize:640x,quality:90x75/images/43e0ffc79eb356706fb25f8f64c9fd5a9e3f9335db80bd8f1f53609ca21ad482_1.jpg

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican

  318. @res
    @Jack D


    Blacks figure that there’s a long way to go before the score will be even.
     
    That would be much more tolerable if their calculation was even close to reasonable. The inability to recognize how much they have been given (e.g. affirmative action, disproportionate use of benefits, simply being able to live in a first world country vs. Africa) and taken (e.g. disproportionate crime) makes any discussion of this impossible.

    Instead we get demands for millions of dollars per person for "reparations" (including for some who immigrated since slavery, and some of those who might be descendants of those who sold them in the first place). And we all know that still would not be enough. The only question is how many years (months, weeks, days?) would it take for the next set of demands?

    Replies: @Jack D, @Art Deco, @nebulafox

    As someone else said, blacks are a cheap date for Democrats (who in any case spend taxpayer money and not their own money). So far at least, all that has been given is lip service ABOUT reparations rather than any actual money. The outrageous (from the white and fiscally sound POV – for blacks no amount would be too much) demands only make it LESS likely that they will get anything at all. If there was some reasonable demand then at least in cities with a small black population it would have been possible to give each black a few thousand $ without breaking the budget, but at $5 million a head it becomes completely impossible almost everywhere. Even is a city like SF with a small black % the amounts demanded are several times the entire annual budget of the city.

    One almost wonders if these demands were DESIGNED to be refused so that blacks could keep nursing their grievances and never have to hear “that claim was settled so don’t go asking for more $”.

  319. @fredyetagain aka superhonky
    @Jack D


    Whites in the American South drew the wrong lesson after Haiti – they should have put their Africans back on a boat instead of doubling down on permanent rule by terror. Anything short of that was just kicking the can down the road.
     
    Jack, you've written a lot of truly monumentally stupid things here regarding this emmett till issue, but except for your "rule by terror" histrionics, you've actually made a good point above. Too bad the boat solution you mentioned was never implemented; it would have saved a lot of innocent White suffering at the hands of feral, sadistic blacks.
    Oh and btw, both till and your co-ethnic leo frank got exactly what they deserved.

    Replies: @Jack D, @Art Deco

    About 400,000 blacks were imported from west Africa over a period of shy of 200 years. No, it was never a practical idea to load 4,000,000 English-speaking blacks onto boats and dump them on the west African coast where they were strangers to every aspect of African life.
    ==
    Note, prior to 1865, non-negroid populations were confined to the temperate and subtropical zones in Africa, except for some coastal trading posts. The disease environment of the interior made it a death sentence to venture there.

  320. @res
    @Jack D


    Blacks figure that there’s a long way to go before the score will be even.
     
    That would be much more tolerable if their calculation was even close to reasonable. The inability to recognize how much they have been given (e.g. affirmative action, disproportionate use of benefits, simply being able to live in a first world country vs. Africa) and taken (e.g. disproportionate crime) makes any discussion of this impossible.

    Instead we get demands for millions of dollars per person for "reparations" (including for some who immigrated since slavery, and some of those who might be descendants of those who sold them in the first place). And we all know that still would not be enough. The only question is how many years (months, weeks, days?) would it take for the next set of demands?

    Replies: @Jack D, @Art Deco, @nebulafox

    It’s a reasonable counter-factual that the problems to which you refer we have because white leftists have invited them.
    ==
    Imagine the policy had been to distribute public sector positions by timely written examinations; end segregation in public parks, buildings, and conveyances; end mandated segregation in commercial service provision, stop enforcing restrictive covenants on property deeds; end government intervention in the real estate sector bar building codes, land-use planning, and property tax assessment and levies; scrap parallel school systems, rejigger funding formulae for primary and secondary schooling, debar jim crow provisions in collective bargaining agreements, mandate impartial service in utilities and in certain services for travelers, establish public defender’s offices and Miranda rights, reapportion the legislatures, and institute impartial procedures for assembling voter rolls. IOW, put an end to all the shitty little contrivances but otherwise eschew institutionalized social work and leave people to cope with life with their wits and with the bits of common provision provided the whole populace.
    ==
    Chronic dissatisfaction and recrimination is a function of it being encouraged and rewarded.

  321. @Jack D
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    You're still keeping your own score. Remind me never to play golf with you.

    Unz is a somewhat unique group. Most Americans don't consider The Protocols of the Elders of Zion to be required reading. What about on the national level? The President of the United States has just declared Till to be an National Hero. It's only a matter of time before we celebrate Till's Birthday as a national holiday instead of Slave Owner Washington's Birthday. So who has REALLY won this argument?

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Reg Cæsar

    You’re still keeping your own score.

    LOL, no. You’re the only one who has disagreed (to me) on my Emmett Till opinion, while lots of regulars have disagreed with you, including a bunch who have agreed with me directly or cited my comments favorable against yours. It looks like at least 10:1 ratio consensus in my favor on this. Your arguments (i.e., lies) fail not just with me, but most of the commentariat. The ‘gameplay’ and ‘scoring’ is entirely in public view; you lost.

    Most Americans don’t consider The Protocols of the Elders of Zion to be required reading.

    Are you saying it’s because most Americans are anti-Semitic already? The President of the United States, whose opinion you seem to respect, sure seems worried:

    What about on the national level? The President of the United States has just declared Till to be an National Hero.

    What types of people do you think would find Emmett Till to be a hero? Rapist sympathizers? Anti-Whites? Pervert Biden is demonstrably anti-White; I can see why (((you))) would cite him favorably as a moral authority:

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/the-white-scare/#comment-5549169 (#34)

  322. @RadicalCenter
    @Corvinus

    As you well know, the “Old Testament” is chock full of vicious unnecessary cruelty allegedly perpetrated by God, or by the “chosen people” with the approval or command of God. Tells us all we need to know about anyone, Jewish or Christian or Muslim, who believes in those “holy books” as the “word of God.”

    It’s quick and easy to read the “OT” and verify this. Sane non-psychopathic people have no obligation to accord respect to maniacs who say they believe in the OT / “the torah.”

    Shame on you and the rest of your ilk from all three abrahamic “religions” who refuse to condemn and reject the old testament’s vile celebration of sadism, murder and torture.

    Justify these, you sick bastard, and tell us again about “kindness” in Judaism and the Judaism-descended/influenced “religions”:

    https://skepticsannotatedbible.com/dwb/TOC.html

    There are many millions of good hearted, fairminded, kind, peaceful people calling themselves Christians, jews and Muslims — but only because they do not conduct themselves ANYthing like the “God” or ”his chosen people” portrayed and lionized in the OT. Why not come out and explicitly reject the whole vile mess already?

    Replies: @Corvinus

    “Tells us all we need to know about anyone, Jewish or Christian or Muslim, who believes in those “holy books” as the “word of God.”

    True defenders of white society and Western Civilization embrace the Bible and the word of God.

    “Sane non-psychopathic people have no obligation to accord respect to maniacs who say they believe in the OT / “the torah.”

    Equating believers of Christianity and Judaism as being “maniacs” is self-serving.

    “Shame on you and the rest of your ilk from all three abrahamic “religions””

    This is what a man possessed by evil says.

  323. @Jack D
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    You're still keeping your own score. Remind me never to play golf with you.

    Unz is a somewhat unique group. Most Americans don't consider The Protocols of the Elders of Zion to be required reading. What about on the national level? The President of the United States has just declared Till to be an National Hero. It's only a matter of time before we celebrate Till's Birthday as a national holiday instead of Slave Owner Washington's Birthday. So who has REALLY won this argument?

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @Reg Cæsar

    Remind me never to play golf with you.

    Better yet, mash him with your mashie!

    Arguments can wallow in the pigsty here, but there are only two commenters who aim for the all-out Dalrymple-style humiliation of others. One of them is Corvinus. The other, even worse, is Jenner.

    • Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Reg Cæsar


    the all-out Dalrymple-style humiliation of others
     
    Your Dalrymple reference is wack-o. Are you calling the iSteve comments section some sort of “communist society” and me a would-be commissar or something? Does that make Steve Sailer… Stalin? (And does he also comment as “Joe Stalin”??) A prayer for all the poor comments still in gulags, moderated at whim!
  324. @Reg Cæsar
    @Jack D


    Remind me never to play golf with you.
     
    Better yet, mash him with your mashie!


    https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/mWkAAOSwEOhft1uw/s-l1200.webp


    Arguments can wallow in the pigsty here, but there are only two commenters who aim for the all-out Dalrymple-style humiliation of others. One of them is Corvinus. The other, even worse, is Jenner.


    https://imageproxy.ifunny.co/crop:x-20,resize:640x,quality:90x75/images/43e0ffc79eb356706fb25f8f64c9fd5a9e3f9335db80bd8f1f53609ca21ad482_1.jpg

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican

    the all-out Dalrymple-style humiliation of others

    Your Dalrymple reference is wack-o. Are you calling the iSteve comments section some sort of “communist society” and me a would-be commissar or something? Does that make Steve Sailer… Stalin? (And does he also comment as “Joe Stalin”??) A prayer for all the poor comments still in gulags, moderated at whim!

  325. @RadicalCenter
    @Wilkey

    We should add two more federal holidays. A popular political compromise would be Irish Heritage Day on “Saint” Patrick’s Day plus a Mexican Heritage Day on Cinco de Mayo. That covers two of the largest ethno-cultural groups/influences in the country. Perhaps the two largest, at this point.

    This wouldn’t directly benefit only government employees, but also employees of banks and most corporations.

    Let tens of millions of people spend more time with their families, resting, exercising, and in our case learning — less time polluting the air and water with stressful commutes. We can still get done what needs to be done.

    Some small businesses that choose to remain open would be busier, especially restaurants.

    Replies: @Wilkey

    We should add two more federal holidays.

    Yes, of course: two more federal holidays that the vast majority of people working in the private sector won’t have off. Because who gives a shit about those of us who work in the private sector?

  326. @Peter Akuleyev
    @rebel yell

    Fair enough that the Confederate Generals were not “traitors”. Nonetheless they were mostly a contemptible group of elites who dragged hundreds of thousands of young Southern white men to their deaths in a war to protect the property rights of a small minority (and not just any property rights, we are talking about the right to import and breed Africans in the US, a property right that has done tremendous long term damage to the US). Anyone who waves a Confederate flag has no right to complain about elites trying to replace white
    people. That was the core value of the CSA.

    Replies: @Art Deco, @Colin Wright

    ‘…we are talking about the right to import and breed Africans in the US, a property right that has done tremendous long term damage to the US).’

    You’re aware the importation of slaves into the US had been banned for more than fifty years when the Civil War broke out?

  327. @The Anti-Gnostic
    @Ralph L

    It's pretty bizarre that wild animals are culled more ruthlessly for antagonism with humans than Canis lupus familiaris.

    Replies: @Sollipsist, @Jack D

    Not even close. At my shelter, one shelter in a country with more than 3500 shelters, we euthanize around a dozen dogs each day for exhibiting behavior that even just suggests aggression. And there are plenty of shelters quicker to make the call than we are, and less humane in their methods.

    Pretty sure that amounts to several orders of magnitude more than the number of wild animals killed for antagonism toward humans. The number of people who even got treated for animal bites last year was less than 50k, and half of those were by birds and rodents — not generally targets for mass revenge killing.

    So I guess just be happy that the world is actually a tiny bit less bizarre than you think it is.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    @Sollipsist


    '...and half of those were by birds and rodents — not generally targets for mass revenge killing...'
     
    Obviously, you've never grown blueberries.

    Replies: @Sollipsist

  328. @David In TN
    @Anon

    They were glad Simpson got away with it.

    Replies: @Anon

    They were glad Simpson got away with it.

    Okay, but why? Why were they glad that Simpson got away with it?

    • Replies: @Jim Don Bob
    @Anon


    Okay, but why? Why were they glad that Simpson got away with it?
     
    Maybe they thought the white bitch deserved it for taking a black man away from them.

    I remember being quite surprised at quickly the jury decided. It's almost as if they had their minds made up before hand.
  329. @Anon
    @David In TN


    They were glad Simpson got away with it.
     
    Okay, but why? Why were they glad that Simpson got away with it?

    Replies: @Jim Don Bob

    Okay, but why? Why were they glad that Simpson got away with it?

    Maybe they thought the white bitch deserved it for taking a black man away from them.

    I remember being quite surprised at quickly the jury decided. It’s almost as if they had their minds made up before hand.

  330. @The Anti-Gnostic
    @Ralph L

    It's pretty bizarre that wild animals are culled more ruthlessly for antagonism with humans than Canis lupus familiaris.

    Replies: @Sollipsist, @Jack D

    It’s not bizarre at all. Wild animals are expected to generally stay away from humans and densely populated area so if any are so aggressive as to actually attack humans except for the most compelling reasons (your are molesting their cubs) they are usually culled or at least moved from populated areas.

    Domestic dogs OTOH are by their nature (dogs did not exist before humans in effect created them) and by definition in daily and intimate contact with humans. These things literally live in our house in most cases. In some cases even in people’s beds. We therefore tolerate (within limits) a certain amount of aggression from them.

    For example, if the fox that I sometimes see in my yard ran up to me and bit me, I would not tolerate having it in my yard (especially with unknown rabies status) and would see to it that it was removed immediately. OTOH, my late labradoodle, as gentle as she was (as gentle as a dog can be) would sometimes bare her teeth and growl (which was in itself amusing because she looked like a stuffed animal with big floppy ears) and even snap at you (without really seriously biting) if you tried to take some food item from her mouth or if you touched some sore spot on her body. But this was only because we were in much closer proximity to each other than any wild animal would ever be. I wouldn’t dream of trying to take a bone from the mouth of a wolf.

  331. @Jack D
    @fredyetagain aka superhonky


    Oh and btw, both till and your co-ethnic leo frank got exactly what they deserved.
     
    I disagree but what is really important is not that they got what they deserved but the process. Our legal system is carefully calibrated to protect the rights of the innocent. Benjamin Franklin phrased it thusly:

    "it is better 100 guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer"

    This is especially true in case of capital punishment where there is no going back.

    Mob justice does not operate by this principle. Sometimes the mob gets it right and sometimes it gets it wrong. Even when it gets it right, it is purely by luck because there is no real process to determine guilt, just mob sentiment. And if it get it wrong? Oops. Sorry.

    Frank's guilt is still debated but at least you could say that the punishment fit the crime IF he was guilty. In Till's case, even assuming the worst version of what he allegedly did, death was not the appropriate penalty and it's ridiculous that you think that it is. If Till had been a 14 year old white boy there's no way on earth you would think that he "got what he deserved".

    Replies: @David In TN, @fredyetagain aka superhonky, @Colin Wright

    Speaking of the murder of Mary Phagan, the Georgia law enforcement authorities believed Leo Frank was guilty when they arrested him and tried him for the murder. And the black janitor, Jim Conley, was the main prosecution witness. Later it developed that Conley was likely the killer.

    The Atlanta cops thought a black who killed a White girl would have run off. Instead, Conley stayed and implicated his boss. White men in early 20th century Georgia would NEVER knowingly have allowed a black to rape-murder a White girl and get away with it.

    Unfortunately DNA did not exist at the time.

    • Disagree: Colin Wright
    • Replies: @Jack D
    @David In TN

    I agree that Conley was most likely the killer but the anti-Semites of Unz feel strongly that it was Frank and that he got what he deserved. This all happened a century ago and everyone involved would have died of old age by now anyway so I don't really have strong feelings about it but the anti-Semites of Unz seem to relish the thought of Frank's guilt and take pleasure in his lynching and will give you all sorts of ( phony) details that "prove" his guilt. (Frank had an eye for the young factory girls which is not unheard for some Jewish men, but he was not a murderer- murder is a black thang).

    However, the anti-Semites miss the point (or maybe not since to them the "point" is that Jews are always evil) which is that lynching is inherently unjust even IF they target the correct victim. Due process is an extricable part of justice and lynching by definition lacks due process.

    Replies: @David In TN, @Johann Ricke, @Art Deco

  332. @David In TN
    @Jack D

    Speaking of the murder of Mary Phagan, the Georgia law enforcement authorities believed Leo Frank was guilty when they arrested him and tried him for the murder. And the black janitor, Jim Conley, was the main prosecution witness. Later it developed that Conley was likely the killer.

    The Atlanta cops thought a black who killed a White girl would have run off. Instead, Conley stayed and implicated his boss. White men in early 20th century Georgia would NEVER knowingly have allowed a black to rape-murder a White girl and get away with it.

    Unfortunately DNA did not exist at the time.

    Replies: @Jack D

    I agree that Conley was most likely the killer but the anti-Semites of Unz feel strongly that it was Frank and that he got what he deserved. This all happened a century ago and everyone involved would have died of old age by now anyway so I don’t really have strong feelings about it but the anti-Semites of Unz seem to relish the thought of Frank’s guilt and take pleasure in his lynching and will give you all sorts of ( phony) details that “prove” his guilt. (Frank had an eye for the young factory girls which is not unheard for some Jewish men, but he was not a murderer- murder is a black thang).

    However, the anti-Semites miss the point (or maybe not since to them the “point” is that Jews are always evil) which is that lynching is inherently unjust even IF they target the correct victim. Due process is an extricable part of justice and lynching by definition lacks due process.

    • Disagree: Colin Wright
    • Replies: @David In TN
    @Jack D

    Have you seen David Cole's latest (https://takimag.com/article/the-rights-ideological-dysgenics/) at TakiMag? He rips Ron Unz and the "anti-Semites of Unz."

    Replies: @res

    , @Johann Ricke
    @Jack D


    Frank had an eye for the young factory girls which is not unheard for some Jewish men
     
    I wouldn't qualify that segment with the word "Jewish". Having the equivalent of a wandering eye is practically an evolutionary trait among living things, flora and fauna alike.
    , @Art Deco
    @Jack D

    IIRC, the testimony in regard to Frank's eye for the young ladies was mostly an account of fairly inconsequential things. Appended to that was a dubious account by a local madam.
    ==
    The factory was shut down due to a lapse in the delivery of supplies. In the building that day were some office employees, the janitor, and the nightwatchman. Mary Phagan's corpse was found in the basement by the nightwatchman in the wee hours of the morning. They had oral testimony from her family as to her plans for the day and the time she left home, oral testimony placing her on a streetcar on the way to the plant, testimony that she arrived at the plant and was told by the cashier that the plant manager would be distributing payroll that day, testimony that she went up the stairs, and an entry in the plant manager's pay book noting he'd disbursed wages to her. (He told the police visiting his home the next day that he'd have to check his pay book to see if a 'Mary Phagan' had collected her wages the previous day). No testimony that anyone had seen her anywhere in town after she'd arrived at the plant. The nightwatchman did not arrive at work until 4:00 pm and the plant manager tells him his services are not yet needed, return at 6:00 pm, which he does. Not many men in the building that day and one of them did not arrive at work until five hours after the deceased was last seen. That put Frank on the suspect list, as did Frank's nervous reaction when told a corpse had been found in the factory basement.

    Replies: @res

  333. @Jack D
    @David In TN

    I agree that Conley was most likely the killer but the anti-Semites of Unz feel strongly that it was Frank and that he got what he deserved. This all happened a century ago and everyone involved would have died of old age by now anyway so I don't really have strong feelings about it but the anti-Semites of Unz seem to relish the thought of Frank's guilt and take pleasure in his lynching and will give you all sorts of ( phony) details that "prove" his guilt. (Frank had an eye for the young factory girls which is not unheard for some Jewish men, but he was not a murderer- murder is a black thang).

    However, the anti-Semites miss the point (or maybe not since to them the "point" is that Jews are always evil) which is that lynching is inherently unjust even IF they target the correct victim. Due process is an extricable part of justice and lynching by definition lacks due process.

    Replies: @David In TN, @Johann Ricke, @Art Deco

    Have you seen David Cole’s latest (https://takimag.com/article/the-rights-ideological-dysgenics/) at TakiMag? He rips Ron Unz and the “anti-Semites of Unz.”

    • Replies: @res
    @David In TN

    Interesting that the silent treatment for Ron seems to have ended.

    Regarding Cole's article. Worth pondering how much of the non-liability of the loopy leftists is due to the 24x7x365 media tailwind they enjoy.

  334. Should’ve kept those dirty mitts to himself. Why in the hell is he being revived and remembered when there’s many white Tills being brutalized every fcking month?!?!?!

  335. @Colin Wright
    @SF


    'Suppose we could have a serious conversation on the subject of what is the best deal we could give the blacks without running the country into the ground. Something symbolic like this, yeah, I would throw that into the deal.'
     
    Whatever 'deal' you offer blacks. they will (and do) just demand more. Offer them civil rights, and they demand reparations.

    I say we should give them what is convenient for us, what they can handle, and what will work: Jim Crow.

    For those who don't like it, we'll offer a free one-way plane ticket to the African nation of their choice.

    Replies: @Big P, @nebulafox

    The real issue is once reparations are made, things will be repaired, right?

    Of course we know that’ll never happen. All of the other redundant points against reparations neednt be recapitulated; we already understand not a dirty cent be owed to any damn person.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    @Big P


    '...Of course we know that’ll never happen. All of the other redundant points against reparations neednt be recapitulated; we already understand not a dirty cent be owed to any damn person...'
     
    Meh. Blacks owe me quite a bit. I never agreed to let them off the hook.
  336. @Anon
    @David In TN


    During the Simpson trial I worked at a place with a lot of black employees. Every one I talked to knew he was guilty but approved the verdict.
     
    Why? Why did they approve the verdict?

    Replies: @David In TN, @Big P

    They are no-good 3/5 vermin

    (actually, my math is off; it’s more like 1/5)

    The fact we are paying dearly for slavery to this day draws extreme ire.

  337. @David In TN
    @Jack D

    Have you seen David Cole's latest (https://takimag.com/article/the-rights-ideological-dysgenics/) at TakiMag? He rips Ron Unz and the "anti-Semites of Unz."

    Replies: @res

    Interesting that the silent treatment for Ron seems to have ended.

    Regarding Cole’s article. Worth pondering how much of the non-liability of the loopy leftists is due to the 24x7x365 media tailwind they enjoy.

  338. @Jack D
    @David In TN

    I agree that Conley was most likely the killer but the anti-Semites of Unz feel strongly that it was Frank and that he got what he deserved. This all happened a century ago and everyone involved would have died of old age by now anyway so I don't really have strong feelings about it but the anti-Semites of Unz seem to relish the thought of Frank's guilt and take pleasure in his lynching and will give you all sorts of ( phony) details that "prove" his guilt. (Frank had an eye for the young factory girls which is not unheard for some Jewish men, but he was not a murderer- murder is a black thang).

    However, the anti-Semites miss the point (or maybe not since to them the "point" is that Jews are always evil) which is that lynching is inherently unjust even IF they target the correct victim. Due process is an extricable part of justice and lynching by definition lacks due process.

    Replies: @David In TN, @Johann Ricke, @Art Deco

    Frank had an eye for the young factory girls which is not unheard for some Jewish men

    I wouldn’t qualify that segment with the word “Jewish”. Having the equivalent of a wandering eye is practically an evolutionary trait among living things, flora and fauna alike.

  339. @Jack D
    @David In TN

    I agree that Conley was most likely the killer but the anti-Semites of Unz feel strongly that it was Frank and that he got what he deserved. This all happened a century ago and everyone involved would have died of old age by now anyway so I don't really have strong feelings about it but the anti-Semites of Unz seem to relish the thought of Frank's guilt and take pleasure in his lynching and will give you all sorts of ( phony) details that "prove" his guilt. (Frank had an eye for the young factory girls which is not unheard for some Jewish men, but he was not a murderer- murder is a black thang).

    However, the anti-Semites miss the point (or maybe not since to them the "point" is that Jews are always evil) which is that lynching is inherently unjust even IF they target the correct victim. Due process is an extricable part of justice and lynching by definition lacks due process.

    Replies: @David In TN, @Johann Ricke, @Art Deco

    IIRC, the testimony in regard to Frank’s eye for the young ladies was mostly an account of fairly inconsequential things. Appended to that was a dubious account by a local madam.
    ==
    The factory was shut down due to a lapse in the delivery of supplies. In the building that day were some office employees, the janitor, and the nightwatchman. Mary Phagan’s corpse was found in the basement by the nightwatchman in the wee hours of the morning. They had oral testimony from her family as to her plans for the day and the time she left home, oral testimony placing her on a streetcar on the way to the plant, testimony that she arrived at the plant and was told by the cashier that the plant manager would be distributing payroll that day, testimony that she went up the stairs, and an entry in the plant manager’s pay book noting he’d disbursed wages to her. (He told the police visiting his home the next day that he’d have to check his pay book to see if a ‘Mary Phagan’ had collected her wages the previous day). No testimony that anyone had seen her anywhere in town after she’d arrived at the plant. The nightwatchman did not arrive at work until 4:00 pm and the plant manager tells him his services are not yet needed, return at 6:00 pm, which he does. Not many men in the building that day and one of them did not arrive at work until five hours after the deceased was last seen. That put Frank on the suspect list, as did Frank’s nervous reaction when told a corpse had been found in the factory basement.

    • Replies: @res
    @Art Deco


    IIRC, the testimony in regard to Frank’s eye for the young ladies was mostly an account of fairly inconsequential things. Appended to that was a dubious account by a local madam.
     
    For one thing the court testimony on that topic was limited by the judge. More about Frank's behavior in this comment, Ron's post it's under, and the other comments there.
    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-leo-frank-case-and-the-origins-of-the-adl/?showcomments#comment-5886453
  340. @AnotherDad
    This offers a fine opportunity for some Republican presidential hopeful to step up, and say he will rescind this monument upon taking office.

    That that Till is sad personal story of rude and crude teenager and a hotheaded husband and his brother taking murderous revenge, but 70 years after the fact is being used by minoritarian ideologues and Parasite Party hacks to spread this lie that blacks are oppressed and their problems are the fault of white people, rather than of their own making; basically in service of a bunch of racial lying designed to inflame racial tensions in order to keep blacks as a reliable Parasite Party vote bank. Disgusting stuff.

    Replies: @CalCooledge, @Jack D, @Alden

    Weren’t the actual physical killers two black employees of the Bryants??? Who cares, the death prevented him from producing more black rapists and murderers.

  341. @Jack D
    @Reg Cæsar

    As I said before, Till stands not just for his own death at the hands of white trash, but for the whole system that existed to deprive blacks of the promises of legal equality made in the 14th Amendment and which permeated Southern society and government.

    Personally I doubt that if Till had been a white kid from Chicago that he would have been killed. A white teenager did not threaten the social order in the way that Till did. Carolyn Bryant was able to stay alone in an isolated store in an all black community because of the regime of fear created by Mississippi whites. Killing a white teen would not have served to maintain the regime of fear.

    Even under the unwritten code of the South, Till deserved no more than a thorough beating. Although the code of the South did not permit his killers to be convicted, neither were they hailed as local heroes - in fact they were shunned by the locals and had to move away because they had also broken the local social order (and indeed helped immeasurably to bring about the end of that order). The fact that Till was black and seen as less than human (also that he continued to mouth off to them) is what caused his killers to escalate from a mere beating to murder. In fact, THEY are the ones who should be getting monuments for that reason. Till would have probably end up dead or in prison in Chicago anyway but for their intervention. But nobody puts up statues of Pontius Pilate either.

    For whatever reason, just or unjust, sometimes random dufuses become symbolic heroes. Blacks being blacks, they have more random dufuses than most - Rodney King, George Floyd, etc. Rosa Parks was not a random dufus and neither was Homer Plessy because they were both carefully chosen in advance to be test defendants.

    Replies: @Alden

    The Bryant’s weren’t trash. They were prosperous business owners and farmers. The store was just a side business. They owned a couple farms, maybe 3. Land ownership the farms and the store.

    Were all the thousands of Jews who owned small stores in the 1950s alps White trash? By your definition running a small store is trash then allthise Jewish small store owners were White trash too. Chicken farm in New Jersey cotton farm in the south. What’s the difference?

    • Replies: @nebulafox
    @Alden

    Extrajudicially torturing and executing a 14 year old so brutally (and for what?) that even those gearing up for Jim Crow’s last stand were appalled before it inevitably became about the wider defence of the social system strikes me as “trash” human being territory.

    If Mississippi had just done what they initially were going to do and convicted Bryant and Milam, then they could have made the argument that they had the right to go about the changing times (part of the reason why the Till murder shocked everyone apart from TV showing everybody the unrecognisable corpse in front of the mother was because lynching was nearly extinct by 1955, let alone being the sort of thing you sent postcards about as in the 1910s) as they saw fit. That’s what “state’s rights” was all about, right? It would have also sent an effective message to the rest of the world refuting the Communist propaganda that Mississippi so theoretically abhorred. Instead, by showing they couldn’t be trusted with carrying out the most basic justice imaginable back in an era where most Americans actually took such notions seriously, they gave credence to every argument that the NAACP had about the necessity for federal intervention in the eyes of the rest of the US for the next decade. They brought about the very scenario they feared in their quest to show independence instead of doing the simple, honest thing, which might have given them more control over how the next decade or two unfolded.

    There is a lot of room between denying the historical reality of what happened for what it was, and buying into geriatric pushed cults that want so desperately for America’s problems to be those of the past, not those that their generation of politicians helped create. The people doing the former are going to be what the latter cling onto use as justification as they pass into the next world and leave the rest of us to deal with the mess, no matter how irrelevant it is.

    , @Art Deco
    @Alden

    The Bryant’s weren’t trash. They were prosperous business owners and farmers.
    ==
    They weren't farmers and the business was their primary source of income. The women ran the store and the men did wage work. Functionally middle-class but actually fairly impecunious, as people in their 20s commonly are.
    ==
    People who would abduct a 14 year old youth and beat him to death are not an asset to the community. If the community had any doubts about that, the doubts disappeared when the pair were so brazen to Wm. Bradford Huie.

  342. @res
    @Alden


    Back in the 1930s a study began to discover if rape was a genetic thing. Rape victims who got pregnant with boys who kept and raised the sons of the rapists were contacted. The mothers promised to allow the researchers to follow their sons for life.

    1930s 40s when all the intellectuals and not really experts believed in nurture may nature. The researchers obtained a variety of mothers and sons from different regions economic status ethnicities religion etc to obtain a large number of subjects.

    The results of the study was amazing. By age 25, 40 percent of the sons of rapists had been convicted not just accused of rape. By 30 even more had been convicted of rape.
     

    That sounds believable, but I have not been able to find the study. Based on your comment it sounds like the study would have been done in the 1960s or later (at least 30 years old after birth in the 1930s?). Can you offer any information (e.g. authors, publication date, keywords, notable aspects like location which might help a search) to help me look?

    Some links I ran across while looking. First, to tie this into the current victim culture (from the UK).

    Daisy’s Law’: New Research Commissioned By Centre For Women’s Justice Demonstrates Why Children Born From Rape Should Be Recognised As ‘Victims’ In Law

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pregnancy_from_rape

    https://trauma.blog.yorku.ca/2016/01/children-born-of-rape-face-a-painful-legacy/

    Growing Up Under a Shadow: Key Issues in Research on and Treatment of Children Born of Rape
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237268738_Growing_Up_Under_a_Shadow_Key_Issues_in_Research_on_and_Treatment_of_Children_Born_of_Rape

    Edit: finally realized "heritability rape" was a good search.

    Sexual offending runs in families: A 37-year nationwide study (Sweden)
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4469797


    genetic effects tended to be weaker for rape of an adult (19%) than for child molestation (46%).
     
    https://archive.nytimes.com/kristof.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/23/do-we-have-a-rape-gene/

    https://www.newsweek.com/can-we-blame-our-bad-behavior-stone-age-genes-80349

    Replies: @Alden

    The study began in the mid 1930s with babies and boys under age 6. Continued until the mid 1980s when the oldest boys would have been 50.

    Made into a book. The book was lent to me around 1990 by a psychiatrist who was exec director of one of the many NGOs that parasite on the criminal justice system pretending to rehabilitate criminals. Read it and gave it back to him.

    [MORE]

    Most criminals only serve half their sentences. Get paroled conditions of parole they have to refrain from some things like possessing a gun and do some things like going to counseling. Where nerdy White men psychiatrists tried to convince testosterone overload black men that rape is bad. It’s difficult for blacks to understand. “ gouhs muh nees “

    One of mine; on trial for rape out on bail. Court recessed at noon. Judge specifically ordered him to go back to work and stay there till 5/PM.*

    Instead he went downtown and picked up a 15 year old Australian girl in town for a spring break school trip. Drove to the beach raped her. Threw her out of the car. She managed to memorize most of his license plate. He was caught within a few hours. Plead guilty to both rapes the next week. Tourist board and Aussie consulate outraged. Even though the rapist creature was black. And blacks were sacred in San Francisco then as now.

    I had the great joy of sending him off to maximum term at Pelican Bay. Not Quentin or Folsom where his friends could easily visit.

    An even greater joy was the fact that the rapist worked in the jail. Not as a civil servant but for one of the gazillions of mostly Jewish red diaper baby retired weather underground terrorists non profits dedicated to freeing every black criminal to destroy SF.

    It was that Jew non profit organization that raised the maximum amount bail for him. The reason he was out on bail to rape the 15 year old tourist. And they went to court to support him and testify that he was a good man innocent if the first rape. Long criminal record of course. And worked inside the jail counseling criminals for that commie Jew non profit.

    Conservatives complain about the cost of real government employees. They should complain about the endless tax deductible donation non profits pretending to duplicate government services. At one time we counted up all the non profit commie scum rehabilitating and counseling criminals in the county. Exactly what we suspected. More non profit commie scum counseling criminals than there were criminals in the county.

    Then of course there’s the police investigators criminal attorneys victim’s medical care and compensation probation and parole city and county jails state and federal prisons half way houses.

    All this money spent on people who never should have been born.

    • Replies: @res
    @Alden

    Thanks for your reply. I still have not been able to find the study or book.

  343. @Alden
    @Jack D

    The Bryant’s weren’t trash. They were prosperous business owners and farmers. The store was just a side business. They owned a couple farms, maybe 3. Land ownership the farms and the store.

    Were all the thousands of Jews who owned small stores in the 1950s alps White trash? By your definition running a small store is trash then allthise Jewish small store owners were White trash too. Chicken farm in New Jersey cotton farm in the south. What’s the difference?

    Replies: @nebulafox, @Art Deco

    Extrajudicially torturing and executing a 14 year old so brutally (and for what?) that even those gearing up for Jim Crow’s last stand were appalled before it inevitably became about the wider defence of the social system strikes me as “trash” human being territory.

    If Mississippi had just done what they initially were going to do and convicted Bryant and Milam, then they could have made the argument that they had the right to go about the changing times (part of the reason why the Till murder shocked everyone apart from TV showing everybody the unrecognisable corpse in front of the mother was because lynching was nearly extinct by 1955, let alone being the sort of thing you sent postcards about as in the 1910s) as they saw fit. That’s what “state’s rights” was all about, right? It would have also sent an effective message to the rest of the world refuting the Communist propaganda that Mississippi so theoretically abhorred. Instead, by showing they couldn’t be trusted with carrying out the most basic justice imaginable back in an era where most Americans actually took such notions seriously, they gave credence to every argument that the NAACP had about the necessity for federal intervention in the eyes of the rest of the US for the next decade. They brought about the very scenario they feared in their quest to show independence instead of doing the simple, honest thing, which might have given them more control over how the next decade or two unfolded.

    There is a lot of room between denying the historical reality of what happened for what it was, and buying into geriatric pushed cults that want so desperately for America’s problems to be those of the past, not those that their generation of politicians helped create. The people doing the former are going to be what the latter cling onto use as justification as they pass into the next world and leave the rest of us to deal with the mess, no matter how irrelevant it is.

  344. @Colin Wright
    @SF


    'Suppose we could have a serious conversation on the subject of what is the best deal we could give the blacks without running the country into the ground. Something symbolic like this, yeah, I would throw that into the deal.'
     
    Whatever 'deal' you offer blacks. they will (and do) just demand more. Offer them civil rights, and they demand reparations.

    I say we should give them what is convenient for us, what they can handle, and what will work: Jim Crow.

    For those who don't like it, we'll offer a free one-way plane ticket to the African nation of their choice.

    Replies: @Big P, @nebulafox

    > For those who don’t like it, we’ll offer a free one-way plane ticket to the African nation of their choice.

    Have you ever interacted with actual African-born Africans? Why would they want or accept them?

    As early as the 1800s, it was pretty clear that black Americans were their own, throughly New World cultural construct. Only Americans (white or black) seem to believe they have anything more in common with Africans than white Americans have with Europeans.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    @nebulafox


    '> For those who don’t like it, we’ll offer a free one-way plane ticket to the African nation of their choice...'
     
    I didn't say it was a good idea, or even that many blacks would be stupid enough to take the offer.

    ...it's just what I would be prepared to offer those who didn't want to accept a return to Jim Crow.
  345. @res
    @Jack D


    Blacks figure that there’s a long way to go before the score will be even.
     
    That would be much more tolerable if their calculation was even close to reasonable. The inability to recognize how much they have been given (e.g. affirmative action, disproportionate use of benefits, simply being able to live in a first world country vs. Africa) and taken (e.g. disproportionate crime) makes any discussion of this impossible.

    Instead we get demands for millions of dollars per person for "reparations" (including for some who immigrated since slavery, and some of those who might be descendants of those who sold them in the first place). And we all know that still would not be enough. The only question is how many years (months, weeks, days?) would it take for the next set of demands?

    Replies: @Jack D, @Art Deco, @nebulafox

    Just force them to put a concrete number on it and legal documentation giving up any further claims. They never will. They can’t. Blacks are already losing political power as it is, not least ironically thanks to immigration.

    (Have you seen the political affiliations for men under 35? The whole woke project is being rejected: and this is happening across different racial demographics. That’s the real fulcrum that the GOP should exploit. Simply by making it OK for men and women to accept their natural desires and differences again, they’ll attract both in the long run.)

  346. @nebulafox
    @Colin Wright

    > For those who don’t like it, we’ll offer a free one-way plane ticket to the African nation of their choice.

    Have you ever interacted with actual African-born Africans? Why would they want or accept them?

    As early as the 1800s, it was pretty clear that black Americans were their own, throughly New World cultural construct. Only Americans (white or black) seem to believe they have anything more in common with Africans than white Americans have with Europeans.

    Replies: @Colin Wright

    ‘> For those who don’t like it, we’ll offer a free one-way plane ticket to the African nation of their choice…’

    I didn’t say it was a good idea, or even that many blacks would be stupid enough to take the offer.

    …it’s just what I would be prepared to offer those who didn’t want to accept a return to Jim Crow.

  347. @Big P
    @Colin Wright

    The real issue is once reparations are made, things will be repaired, right?

    Of course we know that'll never happen. All of the other redundant points against reparations neednt be recapitulated; we already understand not a dirty cent be owed to any damn person.

    Replies: @Colin Wright

    ‘…Of course we know that’ll never happen. All of the other redundant points against reparations neednt be recapitulated; we already understand not a dirty cent be owed to any damn person…’

    Meh. Blacks owe me quite a bit. I never agreed to let them off the hook.

  348. @Alden
    @Jack D

    The Bryant’s weren’t trash. They were prosperous business owners and farmers. The store was just a side business. They owned a couple farms, maybe 3. Land ownership the farms and the store.

    Were all the thousands of Jews who owned small stores in the 1950s alps White trash? By your definition running a small store is trash then allthise Jewish small store owners were White trash too. Chicken farm in New Jersey cotton farm in the south. What’s the difference?

    Replies: @nebulafox, @Art Deco

    The Bryant’s weren’t trash. They were prosperous business owners and farmers.
    ==
    They weren’t farmers and the business was their primary source of income. The women ran the store and the men did wage work. Functionally middle-class but actually fairly impecunious, as people in their 20s commonly are.
    ==
    People who would abduct a 14 year old youth and beat him to death are not an asset to the community. If the community had any doubts about that, the doubts disappeared when the pair were so brazen to Wm. Bradford Huie.

  349. res says:
    @Art Deco
    @Jack D

    IIRC, the testimony in regard to Frank's eye for the young ladies was mostly an account of fairly inconsequential things. Appended to that was a dubious account by a local madam.
    ==
    The factory was shut down due to a lapse in the delivery of supplies. In the building that day were some office employees, the janitor, and the nightwatchman. Mary Phagan's corpse was found in the basement by the nightwatchman in the wee hours of the morning. They had oral testimony from her family as to her plans for the day and the time she left home, oral testimony placing her on a streetcar on the way to the plant, testimony that she arrived at the plant and was told by the cashier that the plant manager would be distributing payroll that day, testimony that she went up the stairs, and an entry in the plant manager's pay book noting he'd disbursed wages to her. (He told the police visiting his home the next day that he'd have to check his pay book to see if a 'Mary Phagan' had collected her wages the previous day). No testimony that anyone had seen her anywhere in town after she'd arrived at the plant. The nightwatchman did not arrive at work until 4:00 pm and the plant manager tells him his services are not yet needed, return at 6:00 pm, which he does. Not many men in the building that day and one of them did not arrive at work until five hours after the deceased was last seen. That put Frank on the suspect list, as did Frank's nervous reaction when told a corpse had been found in the factory basement.

    Replies: @res

    IIRC, the testimony in regard to Frank’s eye for the young ladies was mostly an account of fairly inconsequential things. Appended to that was a dubious account by a local madam.

    For one thing the court testimony on that topic was limited by the judge. More about Frank’s behavior in this comment, Ron’s post it’s under, and the other comments there.
    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-leo-frank-case-and-the-origins-of-the-adl/?showcomments#comment-5886453

  350. @Che Blutarsky
    I wonder if his mom ever thought, before leaving Chicago, if I just take this pain in the ass kid to Mississippi maybe the locals will take care of him.

    Or maybe not, but it seems like she knew taking him down there was a bad idea and she did it anyway.

    Replies: @Anon, @Ebony Obelisk, @Alden

    Reasons why she sent Emmett to Mississippi for the summer.

    1 It was the custom for blacks. Keep the thugs out of trouble and help on the southern farms. White parents sent kids to summer camp. Most families visit out of town relatives in summer.

    2 Historically, blacks dump their kids on others.

    2 Emmett was hard to handle get rid of him in summer when he wasn’t in school.

  351. @Jack D
    @fredyetagain aka superhonky


    Oh and btw, both till and your co-ethnic leo frank got exactly what they deserved.
     
    I disagree but what is really important is not that they got what they deserved but the process. Our legal system is carefully calibrated to protect the rights of the innocent. Benjamin Franklin phrased it thusly:

    "it is better 100 guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer"

    This is especially true in case of capital punishment where there is no going back.

    Mob justice does not operate by this principle. Sometimes the mob gets it right and sometimes it gets it wrong. Even when it gets it right, it is purely by luck because there is no real process to determine guilt, just mob sentiment. And if it get it wrong? Oops. Sorry.

    Frank's guilt is still debated but at least you could say that the punishment fit the crime IF he was guilty. In Till's case, even assuming the worst version of what he allegedly did, death was not the appropriate penalty and it's ridiculous that you think that it is. If Till had been a 14 year old white boy there's no way on earth you would think that he "got what he deserved".

    Replies: @David In TN, @fredyetagain aka superhonky, @Colin Wright

    Thank you Jack for at least addressing the issues, instead of just screeching “eeek, anti-semitism!! racism!!” That said:

    Frank’s guilt is still debated but at least you could say that the punishment fit the crime IF he was guilty.

    There is no debate. The rapist frank got what he deserved. The only reason there’s any so-called “debate” going on is because the anti-White ADL (created btw to defend this scumbag rapist/murderer) still needs to shake a few shekels out of the pockets of geriatric jews in Miami Beach. Besides that, only the descendants of Mary Anne Phagan have felt the need to engage in this debate, because the l’chaimstream media have (for decades now) been telling us that poor little frank was nothing but a sweet innocent and a poor victim of “eeek, anti-semitism!!’ You would recognize frank’s guilt yourself, Jack, if you could view the facts dispassionately instead of (as you always seem to do) trying to let your co-ethnics off the hook.

    If Till had been a 14 year old white boy there’s no way on earth you would think that he “got what he deserved”.

    Now I’m not saying that there are no 14-year old White boys who would have sexually assaulted a woman the way the negro till did, but once again the concept of per capita must be taken into consideration. On a per capita basis, nagger bucks and pre-bucks (like till) are so much more dangerous than any other demographic (something like 7% of the population committing something like 50% of the murders in this country!), it’s not even funny. But that’s speaking broadly. Going back to the specifics of this particular case, of course till needed to be dealt with in the manner he was. When a sub-population within the general population proves itself (by its actions) to be only sub-human, then at times DECISIVE action must be taken to keep the sub-humans in line.

    In the words of Metallica, “sad but true”.

  352. @Sollipsist
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    Not even close. At my shelter, one shelter in a country with more than 3500 shelters, we euthanize around a dozen dogs each day for exhibiting behavior that even just suggests aggression. And there are plenty of shelters quicker to make the call than we are, and less humane in their methods.

    Pretty sure that amounts to several orders of magnitude more than the number of wild animals killed for antagonism toward humans. The number of people who even got treated for animal bites last year was less than 50k, and half of those were by birds and rodents -- not generally targets for mass revenge killing.

    So I guess just be happy that the world is actually a tiny bit less bizarre than you think it is.

    Replies: @Colin Wright

    ‘…and half of those were by birds and rodents — not generally targets for mass revenge killing…’

    Obviously, you’ve never grown blueberries.

    • LOL: Sollipsist
    • Replies: @Sollipsist
    @Colin Wright

    I've got a vendetta against Japanese beetles, myself.

  353. @Colin Wright
    @Sollipsist


    '...and half of those were by birds and rodents — not generally targets for mass revenge killing...'
     
    Obviously, you've never grown blueberries.

    Replies: @Sollipsist

    I’ve got a vendetta against Japanese beetles, myself.

  354. @Alden
    @res

    The study began in the mid 1930s with babies and boys under age 6. Continued until the mid 1980s when the oldest boys would have been 50.

    Made into a book. The book was lent to me around 1990 by a psychiatrist who was exec director of one of the many NGOs that parasite on the criminal justice system pretending to rehabilitate criminals. Read it and gave it back to him.

    Most criminals only serve half their sentences. Get paroled conditions of parole they have to refrain from some things like possessing a gun and do some things like going to counseling. Where nerdy White men psychiatrists tried to convince testosterone overload black men that rape is bad. It’s difficult for blacks to understand. “ gouhs muh nees “

    One of mine; on trial for rape out on bail. Court recessed at noon. Judge specifically ordered him to go back to work and stay there till 5/PM.*

    Instead he went downtown and picked up a 15 year old Australian girl in town for a spring break school trip. Drove to the beach raped her. Threw her out of the car. She managed to memorize most of his license plate. He was caught within a few hours. Plead guilty to both rapes the next week. Tourist board and Aussie consulate outraged. Even though the rapist creature was black. And blacks were sacred in San Francisco then as now.

    I had the great joy of sending him off to maximum term at Pelican Bay. Not Quentin or Folsom where his friends could easily visit.

    An even greater joy was the fact that the rapist worked in the jail. Not as a civil servant but for one of the gazillions of mostly Jewish red diaper baby retired weather underground terrorists non profits dedicated to freeing every black criminal to destroy SF.

    It was that Jew non profit organization that raised the maximum amount bail for him. The reason he was out on bail to rape the 15 year old tourist. And they went to court to support him and testify that he was a good man innocent if the first rape. Long criminal record of course. And worked inside the jail counseling criminals for that commie Jew non profit.

    Conservatives complain about the cost of real government employees. They should complain about the endless tax deductible donation non profits pretending to duplicate government services. At one time we counted up all the non profit commie scum rehabilitating and counseling criminals in the county. Exactly what we suspected. More non profit commie scum counseling criminals than there were criminals in the county.

    Then of course there’s the police investigators criminal attorneys victim’s medical care and compensation probation and parole city and county jails state and federal prisons half way houses.

    All this money spent on people who never should have been born.

    Replies: @res

    Thanks for your reply. I still have not been able to find the study or book.

  355. @Jack D
    @res

    It's hard to call his actions "threatening" unless you are a partisan. As a female commenter mentioned here, outrageously bold approaches of white (and black) females by urban black men (in this case a teenager) are common (if wildly out of place in rural Mississippi). I gather that black men are not really picky about whom they mate with as long as it is female and that they operate on the "if you don't ask you don't get" principle. Maybe if you ask 100 females and 1 says yes, that's better than being an incel and batting 0 for 0.

    I gather that his remarks were more of the "C'mon baby, you know that you want it!" variety than actual threats. He also had apparently been egged on by a dare from his local "friends" to whom he had boasted of prior experience with white girls in Chicago.

    As for post hoc defiance, Till cannot speak for himself so we have only the word of his murderers and their accomplices.

    Replies: @Colin Wright

    ‘…As for post hoc defiance, Till cannot speak for himself so we have only the word of his murderers and their accomplices.’

    The point really is that it wasn’t a particularly outrageous killing — as killings go. I’d compare it to a murder occurring in the course of a holdup — as opposed to say, one of those dreary horrors I’d rather not detail. A man losing his temper in a domestic quarrel…one of those petty, tragic but rather meaningless conjunctions of fate. It’s all actually a bit like an incident recounted in a chronicle of traditional Indian village life I once read: Behind Mud Walls. A lower-caste villager had been impudent to an upper-caste villager. The upper-caste men jawed about it for a while, then all went and got sticks and gave dude a thorough thrashing.

    Wrong? Okay. A memorable event in a nation’s history?

    Please. Emmitt Till was an obnoxious punk who managed to get himself killed; this is a relatively common fate for obnoxious punks; it’s not the murder of Thomas Becket. Outside of the immediate time and place, and the immediate participants, it’s a non-event. Tell me about the equivalent happening in 1957 Slovenia — actually, please don’t. I don’t care.

    So why is it noteworthy seventy years after the fact — the subject of a film, no less? It’s as demented as that outbreak of foot washing after the death of Saint Floyd.

    Till’s death is a footnote; the original Look magazine article gave it ample attention. It is significant that we genuflect about it now, alright — but not in the way you imply.

  356. @Jack D
    @fredyetagain aka superhonky


    Oh and btw, both till and your co-ethnic leo frank got exactly what they deserved.
     
    I disagree but what is really important is not that they got what they deserved but the process. Our legal system is carefully calibrated to protect the rights of the innocent. Benjamin Franklin phrased it thusly:

    "it is better 100 guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer"

    This is especially true in case of capital punishment where there is no going back.

    Mob justice does not operate by this principle. Sometimes the mob gets it right and sometimes it gets it wrong. Even when it gets it right, it is purely by luck because there is no real process to determine guilt, just mob sentiment. And if it get it wrong? Oops. Sorry.

    Frank's guilt is still debated but at least you could say that the punishment fit the crime IF he was guilty. In Till's case, even assuming the worst version of what he allegedly did, death was not the appropriate penalty and it's ridiculous that you think that it is. If Till had been a 14 year old white boy there's no way on earth you would think that he "got what he deserved".

    Replies: @David In TN, @fredyetagain aka superhonky, @Colin Wright

    ‘…If Till had been a 14 year old white boy there’s no way on earth you would think that he “got what he deserved”…’

    Actually — had Till been white — I would be inclined to shrug. Nice if he could have learned the lesson more cheaply, but…

    But then — had Till been white — we wouldn’t even be discussing the killing now, let alone finding in it some kind of unique and unfathomable horror.

    That, we do because the precious little angel was black. Should I even bother to recount the truly savage and unprovoked murder of a Chinese retard at the hands of a black mob that I read about in 1976 or so? How’d you like to hear about how the retard’s sister showed up and desperately tried to break through the ring of onlookers again and again as the killer methodically kicked in the skull of her brother?

    That made it to page eighteen of the local paper. But then, the victim wasn’t black. Barely local news. Devoid of significance.

  357. Anon[434] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY)
    @Wilkey

    Thanks.

    Replies: @Anon

    Pakistani accents aren’t like Indian accents
    Pakistani accents sound like the foreign minister of Pakistan who addressed at the Canadian parliament about the situation in Palestine. Imran Khan, the prime minister of Pakistan has a Pakistani accent. It sounds very relaxed in the general sense. Also another fact is Pakistan doesn’t have remotely as much English fluency as India. Pakistan adopted Urdu as the link language. India adopted English.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?