Here are the 2 poses we see and feel in the animation. They are holds. They are drawn with perfectly clear negative spaces, contrasts and lines of action. The action happening between them is visually obvious. Buzz stretches Woody up. The action is clear in just the still poses.

I have this new theory that roughly around 1942 the top directors began to consciously really experiment with new ideas and techniques.http://johnkstuff.blogspot.com/2007/12/clampett-structure-clever-and.html

Even Norm McCabe did some experimenting in this period. I included the 1943 "Confusions Of A Nutsy Spy" because it is one of the first WB cartoons to really try modern things with composition and layout.





By 1946, they were still experimental to an extent but it was less conscious. By this time the directors and animators were so in-synch with each other that they just intuitively and confidently knocked out masterpieces. Here's Jones in top form at his most confident and least conscious of trying to be clever or experimental:
Friz and McKimson were never really too experimental, they basically did their jobs and followed along with the what the trendsetters did but added their own personalities to the cartoons.
Tashlin may have tried many conscious experiments, but he never really got into a flow where everything worked smoothly together. Maybe because his mind was always on his next career and he didn't stay anywhere long enough.

http://www.davemackey.com/animation/wb/1942.html

http://www.davemackey.com/animation/wb/1946.html

In the meantime, here's another great scene from "Mouse Wreckers".
These are all great frames to draw from.
1948 was a year when Chuck was drawing extra solidly. He combined human anatomy with pears and sphere style with animal anatomy.
I just love how solid and menacing this bulldog looks.
The lip is beautiful!

This dog is very McKimson like - the way McKimson drew 8 years earlier. Solid with great hierarchy!


This is a clever gag, showing the scene turn red to indicate the Bulldog's growing rage.

Even cloud scuffles had construction!







Here it is:
http://www.cartoonthrills.org/blog/Jones/48mousewreckers/ClaudeCatTitEyes3.mov

Great timing! Listen to the music again - it's sfx music - no melody.

The situation and the resulting reactions from Claude are funnier than some of the gags that prompt them.
This is a stock kind of cartoon gag. It's drawn and animated beautifully though.
The gag itself is just there to get to the real point of the cartoon - that the mice are trying to convince Claude that he is going crazy so they can take over the house. Claude's reactions to all the things that happen to him are the real point of the cartoon, and where a lot of the humor comes from.
This reminds me of when we were writing Stimpy's Invention - we needed to prompt Ren to get furious and then crazy to prompt Stimpy to create a Happy Helmet for him. Some of the gags that did the prompting weren't that funny on their own, a couple were. Sometimes when you have a pre-ordained structure that all your story details have to fit into, some of the details that connect the structure end up contrived and thus, less spontaneous. This is the difference between just letting your characters take the story wherever the gags lead. Both story approaches have their plusses and minuses. No one approach is the correct one.



Flying around like a balloon is funny when you see it for the first time, but it's a cartoon staple.


This is the part that's funny.
It's pure Chuck Jones. He can create expressions that are impossible to make in real life, but tell you exactly and specifically the complex emotion a character is feeling.

It took Jones a long time to get comfortable making pure entertainment cartoons - almost 10 years.If you look at his first year of cartoons, not a single one is a WB style comedy (maybe the Daffy Duck one was an attempt to please Leon, but it doesn't come off as sincerely wacky). They are all meant to be sweet and cute and precious - very strange for a Warner Bros. director - a risky road to take at the funniest cartoon studio. The next year is even slower and sweeter! Except for 1 important ground-breaking cartoon.From 1940 to 1945 he began doing more funny style cartoons on purpose, but little by little each year.
Here's something odd: the first 3 cartoons of 1942 are all comedies, then the rest of the year is filled with slow conceptual cartoons. Maybe he got yelled at just at the start of the year; who knows?
He got over his cutesy thing after a while and exchanged it for more experimental stylistic cartoons. I really like these cartoons from around 1946, even though they aren't super funny. Chuck seemed consciously intent on creating his own style and personality and was searching for ways to distinguish himself from the other directors. Clampett and Avery on the other hand just made cartoons in their own confident personalities. They didn't have to find themselves. Their natural personalities fit and established the Warner Bros. style.These mid 40s Jones cartoons are full of great ideas in staging, design, stories based on high concepts or influenced by other mediums like radio. His timing is still kinda plodding for the most part.

The animation in them is more full than what he did a short time later - it coincides with Bob Cannon's tenure in Jones' unit. After Cannon left, Jones started doing funnier cartoons - but more pose to pose and less fully animated. I don't know if that's a coincidence or not.
Hair-Raising Hare is the most typical Warner Bros. style cartoon of that year.

In 1947, right after Clampett left, he tried making a couple Clampett style cartoons:
Little Orphan Airedale is actually a remake of Clampett's "Porky's Pooch" from 1941. In fact, right after Clampett left, the whole studio started making Clampett-style cartoons and this lasted for a couple years. His creative momentum and energy inspired the rest of the studio for years after.

By 1948 Jones seems to have decided to make the complete leap to comedy cartoons. Every one of the cartoons on this list is funny and many of them are true classics - some of the best cartoons ever made. They also have a great combination of straight-ahead and pose-to-pose animation.
One thing that confuses matters is that these dates don't match the dates on the films on the DVDs. But you could safely say, Jones did his purest WB comedy cartoons in the late forties.

By 1949, you can start to see a radical change in approach in his cartoons. They become more talky. (Excluding the Roadrunner which has no dialogue at all!) There is less animation and more reliance on the key poses. There are great cartoons in here, but in my opinion it's not quite as powerful a year as the one that came before.

http://www.cartoonthrills.org/blog/Jones/48mousewreckers/ClaudeCatTitEyes2.mov